alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## NO. 12

- 14

- 00329

- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN RE: TARRANT REGIO NAL WATER DISTRICT, A WATER CO NTROL AND IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT , RELATOR §

§

§ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM

Tarrant Regional Water District filed this original mandamus proceeding complaining of the trial court’s October 17, 2014 order declining to appoint special commissioners in the
underlying condemnation proceeding. On February 11, 2015, this Court conditionally g ranted Tarrant’s petition and directed Respondent to vacate his October 17, 2014 order and issue an order appointing three special commissioners. Respondent has now complied with this Court’s
opinion and order, rendering this proceeding moot. Accordingly , we dismiss Tarrant’s petition

for writ of mandamus as moot

. Opinion delivered February 27, 2015. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

( PUBLISH )

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

FEBRUARY 2 7 , 2015

NO. 12

- 14

- 00329

- CV

TARRANT REGIONAL WAT ER DISTRICT, A WATER CONTROL AND IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT , Rela t or V. HON. JOE D. CLAYTON , Respondent

Appeal from the 3rd District Court
of Henderson County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 2014C

- 0144)

ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of mandamus filed by TARRANT

REGIONAL WATER DISTR ICT, A WATER CONTROL AND IMPROVEMENT

DISTRICT ; who is the relator in Cause No. 2014C

- 0144 , pending on the docket of the 3rd

Judicial District Court of Henderson Co unty, Texas. Said petition for writ of mandamus having

been filed herein on November 10, 2014 , and the same having been duly considered, because it
is the opinion of this Court that this original proceeding should be dismissed as moot , it is

therefore CON SIDERED, ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the said petition for writ of
mandamus be, and the same is, hereby dismissed as moot

.

By per curiam opinion

. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

ANDREA T. WILSON, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06cv741-CSC

) (WO)

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL )

SECURITY, )

)

Defendant. )

FINAL JUDGMENT

Upon consideration of the prior proceedings, opinions and orders entered in this case,

it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner be and is hereby

REVERSED and this case be and is hereby REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to

sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings

Done this 2 day of February, 2007. nd

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00741-CSC Document 16 Filed 02/02/07 Page 1 of 1
3027.409 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.       Alternate IV of the (FAR) 48 CFR clause 52.227–14 shall be included in solicitations and contracts containing the basic clause unless the HCA approves an exclusion. Additional non-conflicting alternates may be used.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 3027.4—Rights in Data and Copyrights
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION





Each
      of
      the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of China
      Industrial Waste Management Inc. (the "Company"), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended
      March 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      May 22, 2006








/s/
      Jinqing Dong





Jinqing
      Dong


Chief
      Executive Officer





/s/
      Jinqing Dong


Jinqing
      Dong


Chief
      Financial Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      China Industrial Waste Management Inc. and will be retained by China Industrial
      Waste Management Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or
      its staff upon request.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

April 16, 2014

ERRATA

______________________ 

Appeal Nos. 2013-1160, -1175, -1179

NOVARTIS AG AND

NOVARTIS VACCINES AND DIAGNOSTICS, INC.,

AND

DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE,

v.

MICHELLE K. LEE, Deputy Director, 

United States Patent and Trademark Office,

Decided: January 15, 2014

Precedential Opinion

______________________ 

Please make the following changes: 

Page 2, line 24, change “otherwise-applicable term” to 

--otherwise-applicable terms--. 

Page 12, line 21, change “his own neglect” to --[its] own 

neglect--. 

Page 14, line 26, change “resulting extensions” to 

--resulting extension--.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

B.B., a minor, by and )

through his mother and )

next friend, OWENA KNOWLES, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 3:06cv715-MHT

) 

PAWN CITY, INC., a )

corporation, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED as follows:

(1) The joint motion for scheduling conference (Doc.

No. 26) is granted to the extent that an on-therecord status conference is set for April 3,

2007, at 8:30 a.m.

(2) Counsel for plaintiff is to arrange for the

conference to be conducted by telephone.

DONE, this the 16th day of March, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 30 Filed 03/16/2007 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
               RULE 13a-14(b)


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gallery of History, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Todd Axelrod, Chief Executive Office of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

1.	 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Todd Axelrod
----------------
Todd Axelrod
Chief Executive Officer

August 14, 2008
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________
No. 23

- 10718

Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________

In re: SHIRLEY WHITE

- LETT,

Debtor.

___________________________________________________

SHIRLEY WHITE

- LETT,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

versus FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, a.k.a. Fannie Mae, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM, INCORPORATED, (MERS), USCA11 Case: 23-10718 Document: 44-1 Date Filed: 06/26/2023 Page: 1 of 32 Opinion of the Court 23

- 10718

MERSCORP HOLDINGS, INC., d.b .a. MERS, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,

Defendants

- Appellees,

NEWREZ, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 4:22

- cv

- 00082

- WMR
, Bkcy No. 1:10

- bk

- 61451

- BEM

____________________
Before J ORDAN , N EWSOM , and B RANCH , Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM:
The motion s to dismiss the appeal filed by Bank of America, N.A.; MERSCOPR Holdings, Inc.; Mortgage Electronics Registration Systems, Inc. ; and Federal National Mortgage Association are GRANTED , and this appeal is DISMISSED

. Although the district court’s February 17, 2023 , order resolved the claims against some of the defendants, it did not end the USCA11 Case: 23-10718 Document: 44-1 Date Filed: 06/26/2023 Page: 2 of 323

- 10718 Opinion of the Court 3
litigation on the merits because the matters in the district court rem ain pending as to the Bank of New York Mellon ; the Bank of New York Mellon, Corporation ; RRA CP Opportunity Trust 1 ; Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing ; and NewRez, LLC . Thus, because the district court did not certify the order under Federal Rule of CivilProcedure 54(b), it is not final or otherwise immediately appealable. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291, 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Supreme Fuels Trading FZE v. Sargeant , 689 F.3d 1244, 1246 (11th Cir. 2012) (explaining that an order adjudicating fewer than all th e claims in a suit, or adjudicating the rights and liabilities of fewer than all the parties, is not a final judgment from which an appeal may be taken, unless the district court properly certifies a judgment on fewer than all claims or parties as “final” under Rule 54(b)); CSX Transp., Inc. v. City of Garden City , 235 F.3d 1325, 1327 (11th Cir. 2000) (“A final decision is one which ends the litigation on the merits and leaves nothing for the court to do but execute the judgment .”). Additionally, the February 17, 2023, order is not appealable pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1) because no part y sought injunctive relief in the district court, and the order did not grant or deny such relief. See 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). All pending mot ions other than the motions to dismiss are DENIED as moot. USCA11 Case: 23-10718 Document: 44-1 Date Filed: 06/26/2023 Page: 3 of 3
#### § 1040.112 Noncompliance with assurances.

If an applicant fails or refuses to furnish an assurance required under § 1040.4 of subpart A of this part, or otherwise fails or refuses to comply with a requirement imposed by this part, such as § 1040.102(c), subpart G of this part, action to refuse Federal financial assistance shall be taken in accordance with procedures of § 1040.114 of this subpart.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the amended Annual Report of Buckingham Exploration Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 2) for the year ended May 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:   September 23, 2010
  /s/Christopher Robin Relph





Christopher Robin Relph


Chief Executive Officer and


Chief Financial Officer
COURTROOM DEPUTY MINUTES DATE: AUGUST 24, 2006 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

DIGITAL RECORDING: 3:15 - 3:14 

/ INITIAL APPEARANCE

 DETENTION HEARING 

 REMOVAL HEARING (Rule 5) 

/ ARRAIGNMENT 

 ARRAIGNMENT on SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT 

 PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION 

PRESIDING MAG. JUDGE CHARLES S. COODY DEPUTY CLERK: WANDA STINSON 

CASE NO. 2:06CR205-WHA-CSC DEFT. NAME: COURTNEY D. FLOWERS

USA: CHRISTOPHER SNYDER ATTY: EVERETT M. URECH 

Type Counsel: ( ) Retained; ( / ) Panel CJA; ( ) Waived; ( ) CDO ;

USPTSO/ USPO: RON THWEATT 

Defendant does / does NOT need an interpreter; NAME: 

/Kars. Date of Arrest 8/24/06 or  Rule 5 Arrest

/kia. Deft. First Appearance. Advised of rights/charges.  Pro/Sup Rel Violator

/ Finaff. Financial Affidavit executed  to be obtained by PTS; / ORAL Motion for Appt. Of Counsel. 

 koappted ORAL ORDER appointing Federal Defender - Notice to be filed.

/ 20appt. Panel Attorney Appointed; / to be appointed - prepare voucher

 Deft. Advises he will retain counsel. Has retained 

 Government’ s ORAL (kgoralm.) Motion for Detention Hrg.  To be followed by written motion;

 Government’ sWRITTEN Motion for Detention Hrg. filed. 

 DETENTION HRG  held;  Set for ;  Prelim. Hrg  Set for 

 kotempdtn. ORDER OF TEMPORARY DETENTION PENDING HEARING entered

kodtn. ORDER OF DETENTION PENDING TRIAL entered

/ kocondrls. Release order entered.  Deft. advised of conditions of release.

/kbnd. / BOND EXECUTED (M/D AL charges) $ 25,000 Deft released (kloc LR)

 BOND EXECUTED (R.5 charges) - deft to report to originating district as ordered

 Loc.(LC) Bond NOT executed. Deft to remain in Marshal’ s custody

 ko. Deft. ORDERED REMOVED to originating district

 krmvhrg. Identity/Removal Hearing  set for _________;  WAIVER of Rule 5 & 5.1 Hearings

 kwvprl. Waiver of Preliminary hearing; 

 Court findsPROBABLE CAUSE. Defendant bound over to the Grand Jury.

/Karr. ARRAIGNMENT SET FOR: / HELD. Plea of NOT GUILTY entered. 

 / Trial Term 10/24/06 ; / PRETRIAL CONFERENCE DATE: 9/25/06 

/ DISCOVERY DISCLOSURES DATE: 8/24/06 

 Krmknn. NOTICEto retained Criminal Defense Attorney handed to Counsel

 Kwvspt Waiver of Speedy Trial Act Rights Executed. 

Case 2:06-cr-00205-WHA-CSC Document 8 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 1 of 1
2007-2012.

#### State v. Odavar.

Cuyahoga App. No. 89029, 2007-Ohio-5535. On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied.

Cupp, J., dissents.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Finley, Appellant.

Submitted December 10, 2007;

decided December 13, 2007

Reported below, 42 AD3d 917.

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Timothy Patrick Murphy, Esq., 5528 Main Street, Williamsville, New York 14221 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
#### Doreen Murena, Respondent, v Kenneth Murena, Appellant.

In a matrimonial action in which the plaintiff wife was granted a judgment of divorce, defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated August 20, 1979, which, after a hearing before a Referee, *inter alia,*awarded plaintiff (1) $2,333 in damages, (2) $125 per week as alimony, (3) $50 per week as child support, (4) exclusive possession of the marital residence, with provisions that plaintiff and defendant should share equally the maintenance expenses and that plaintiff should be solely responsible for all utility costs, and (5) a counsel fee of $3,500. Judgment modified, on the law, by (I) deleting from the third decretal paragraph thereof all language beginning with "both plaintiff and defendant are to share equally” and ending with "fuel oil costs”, (2) adding to the second decretal paragraph thereof, which awarded plaintiff alimony of $125 per week, a provision that the award is inclusive of defendant’s obligation to pay the costs and expenses of "maintenance, operation and upkeep” of the marital premises and (3) deleting the sixth decretal paragraph thereof. As so modified, judgment affirmed and case remitted to Special Term for a new determination as to counsel fees after a hearing or, if the parties so stipulate, upon papers specifying in detail the time spent for each particular service. No costs or disbursements are awarded. Section 699.9 of the rules of this court (22 NYCRR 699.9 [f] [6]) provides, in part, that "when the wife is awarded exclusive possession of the marital residence, the sum awarded [as alimony and support] will be inclusive of mortgage interest, amortization and escrow payments” and further that "the judgment should award a specific sum and not direct that he [the husband] pay indeterminate obligations”. The purpose of the foregoing rule is to prevent litigation concerning the amount *641owing as alimony. *(Schwartz v Schwartz,*50 AD2d 877.) In our opinion alimony in the amount of $125 per week, which shall be inclusive of all maintenance, operation and upkeep expenses of the marital premises, is appropriate in light of the financial status of the parties. We note that in determining the counsel fees Special Term erroneously included in its computation services rendered in the Family Court. Lazer, J. P., Gibbons, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
#### § 1022.6 Public inquiries.

Inquiries regarding DOE's floodplain and wetland environmental review requirements may be directed to the Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585-0119, 202-586-4600, or a message may be left at 1-800-472-2756, toll free.
# Subpart 3019.2—Policies

**Parent topic:**PART 3019—SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS

## 3019.201 General policy.

(d) DHS is committed to a unified team approach involving senior management, small business specialists, acquisition personnel and program staff to support both critical homeland security missions and meet public policy objectives concerning small business participation in departmental procurements. The Director, Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization, is responsible for the implementation and execution of programs to assist small businesses, veteran owned small businesses, service-disabled veteran owned small businesses, HUBZone small businesses, small disadvantaged businesses, and women-owned small business concerns as required by the Small Business Act.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-2026

In re: TINDRICK ZEIGLER,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:17-hc-02044-FL)

Submitted: November 19, 2019 Decided: November 21, 2019

Before WILKINSON and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tindrick Zeigler, Petitioner Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Tindrick Zeigler petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has 

unduly delayed acting on his petition for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012). 

He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the 

district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied relief on Zeigler’s petition on 

September 23, 2019. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Zeigler’s 

case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot and deny his motion to expedite. We grant 

leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
```

[109th Congress Public Law 324]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ324.109]

[[Page 120 STAT. 1758]]

Public Law 109-324
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey certain Federal land 
 to Rio Arriba County, New Mexico. <<NOTE: Oct. 11, 2006 -  [S. 213]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress <<NOTE: Rio Arriba County Land 
Conveyance Act.>> assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rio Arriba County Land Conveyance 
Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) County.--The term ``County'' means the County of Rio 
        Arriba, New Mexico.
            (2) Map.--The term ``map'' means the map entitled ``Alcalde 
        Proposed Land Transfer'' and dated September 23, 2004.
            (3) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of the Interior.

SEC. 3. CONVEYANCE OF LAND TO RIO ARRIBA COUNTY, NEW MEXICO.

    (a) In General.--Subject to valid existing rights, the Secretary 
shall convey to the County, without consideration, all right, title, and 
interest of the United States in and to the land (including any 
improvements to the land) described in subsection (b).
    (b) Description of Land.--The land referred to in subsection (a) 
consists of approximately 171 acres of land located on the Sebastian 
Martin Land Grant in the vicinity of Alcalde, Rio Arriba County, New 
Mexico, as depicted on the map.
    (c) Reversion.--If any portion of the land conveyed under subsection 
(a) ceases to be used for public purposes the land shall, at the option 
of the Secretary, revert to the United States.
    (d) Conditions on Sales.--If the County sells any portion of the 
land conveyed to the County under subsection (a)--
            (1) the amount of consideration for the sale shall reflect 
        fair market value, as determined by an appraisal; and
            (2) the County shall pay to the Secretary an amount equal to 
        the gross proceeds of the sale, for use by the Director of the 
        Bureau of Land Management in the State of New Mexico, without 
        further appropriation.

[[Page 120 STAT. 1759]]

    (e) Costs.--The County shall pay any costs associated with the 
conveyance of land under subsection (a).

    Approved October 11, 2006.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 213:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

SENATE REPORTS: No. 109-166 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 151 (2005):
                                    Nov. 16, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.
                                                        Vol. 152 (2006):
                                    Sept. 27, considered and passed 
                                        House.

                                  <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
               RULE 13a-14(b)

In connection with the Quarter Report of Gallery of History, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Rod Lynam, Chief Financial Office of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

1.	 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Rod Lynam
-------------
Rod Lynam
Chief Financial Officer

May 15, 2007
623.506 Suspension of payments, termination of contract, and debarment and suspension actions.       (e) The authority to approve the determination prescribed in FAR 23.506(e) is reserved to the Secretary of State.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 623.5—Drug-Free Workplace
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Leonard Anthony Porter, Jr., Petitioner, v. Paul C. Agnew, as Director of Dannemora State Hospital, et al., Respondents.

Application, pursuant to 'CPLR 7002 (subd. [b], par. 2), for a writ of habeas corpus denied for failure of compliance with article 70 of the CPLR, and more particularly with the provisions of CPLR 7002 (subd. [c], pars. 1, 6) thereof, and as otherwise insufficient on its face. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Greenblott, JJ concur.