alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

MEYLIN CASTRO, INDIVIDUALLY, NO. 2022 CW 0284

AND ON BEHALF OF HER MINOR

CHILDREN, MONICA GISSELL

CASTANEDA- GASTRO, DAVID

MEDIA- CASTRO, AND DYLAN

SNEIJDER MEDIA -GASTRO, AND

MEYLIN P. CASTRO

VERSUS

CHURCH MUTUAL INSURANCE

COMPANY, FIRST UNITED

METHODIST CHURCH OF DENHAM

SPRINGS, ABC INSURANCE

COMPANY, SUNBELT RENTALS

SCAFFOLD SERVICES, LLC, XYZ

INSURANCE COMPANY, AND 1

PRIORITY ENVIRONMENTAL MARCH 30, 2022

SERVICES, INC. 

In Re: 1 Priority Environmental Services, Inc. and Sunbelt

Rentals Scaffold Services, LLC, applying for

supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District Court, 

Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 669, 445. 

BEFORE: GUIDRY, MCCLENDON, WELCH, THERIOT, AND WOLFE, JJ. 

WRIT GRANTED. The portion of the district court' s ruling

which allows the video recording of the additional medical

examination of plaintiff, Meylin Castro, by Jose Lafosse, Ph. D., 

ABPP, is reversed. In reviewing the writ application before us, 

we do not find that the plaintiff has made the required showing

of special circumstances to warrant the imposed condition of

recording the additional medical examination. Accordingly, the

writ is granted and the additional medical examination of

plaintiff with Dr. Lafosse is to proceed without video

recording. 

JMG

PMc

MRT

Welch and Wolfe, JJ., dissent and would deny the writ. The

criteria set forth in Herlitz Construction Co., Inc. v. Hotel

Investors of New Iberia, Inc., 396 So. 2d 878 ( La. 1981) ( per

curiam) are not met. 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

P CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
Subpart 3033.1—Protests

Source: 77 FR 50635, Aug. 22, 2012, unless otherwise noted.

Parent topic: PART 3033—PROTESTS, DISPUTES, AND APPEALS

3033.102 General.

3033.102-90 Protests on classified solicitations (OSA).

To ensure that classified information is protected and appropriate security measures are coordinated

as required, protests involving classified solicitations issued by the Office of Selective Acquisitions

(OSA) shall be submitted directly to the contracting officer for further transmission to the GAO, the

United States Court of Federal Claims, or for internal resolution in the case of agency protests.

Specific instructions will be provided in Section L of the solicitation.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

GERALD PENN, )

 )

PLAINTIFF, )

 )

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06cv738-MEF-WC

 )

VERIZON WIRELESS, INC. )

 )

DEFENDANT. )

FINAL JUDGMENT

On December 13, 2006, Plaintiff filed a Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice (Doc.

# 5) requesting that this action be dismissed with prejudice because the underlying lawsuit

has been resolved. Defendant has not filed served an answer or a motion for summary

judgment. Accordingly, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), it is hereby

ORDERED as follows:

(1) This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

(2) Each party to bear his or its own costs and expenses.

(3) The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter this document on the civil docket as a

Final Judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and close this

file.

DONE this 28th day of March, 2007.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00738-MEF-WC Document 7 Filed 03/28/2007 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Terence Sein, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Alpha Spacecom, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. I am responsible for  establishing  and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures  (as defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and  15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



a) Designed such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure controls and  procedures  to be designed  under my  supervision,  to ensure that material  information  relating  to the small  business  issuer,  including  its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Omitted;



c)  Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  small  business  issuer's  disclosure controls and procedures  and presented in this report my  conclusions  about the effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business  issuer's  internal control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the small  business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has  materially  affected,  or is reasonably  likely to materially  affect,  the small business  issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial  reporting,  to the small  business  issuer's  auditors  and the audit committee  of the  small  business  issuer's  board  of  directors  (or  persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably likely to  adversely  affect  the small  business  issuer's  ability  to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other employees who have a significant  role in the small business  issuer's  internal control over financial reporting.

May 21, 2004

/s/ Terence Sein

Name:  Terence Sein

Title:  Chief Financial Officer
#### § 97.102 Amendments after allowance.

Amendments to the application, after the notice of allowance is issued, may be made, if the certificate has not been issued.
��[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Airport activity statistics ofcertificated air carriers. Summary tables [electronic resource].**
 
1999 | 2000
 
SuDoc Number:TD 12.15/4:
Item Number:0982-N-14 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000550638
 
February 4, 2020
Subpart 649.1—General Principles

Parent topic: PART 649—TERMINATION OF CONTRACTS

649.101 Authorities and responsibilities.

649.101-70 Termination action decisions after debarment.

(a) Prior to making a decision to terminate, based on the consideration listed below, the contracting

officer shall have the proposed action reviewed and approved by:

(1) The Office of the Legal Adviser;

(2) An individual one level above the contracting officer; and

(3) For overseas posts, A/OPE.

(b) Termination for default. Termination for default under a contract's default clause is appropriate

when the circumstances giving rise to the debarment or suspension also constitute a default in the

contractor's performance of that contract. Debarment or suspension of the contractor for reasons

unrelated to the performance of that contract may not support a termination for default.

(c) Termination for convenience or cancellation. Termination for convenience or cancellation under

appropriate contract clauses should be considered when the contractor presents a significant risk to

the Government in completing a current contract and when such termination for convenience or

cancellation is determined to be in the Government's best interests. In making this determination,

the contracting officer should consider such factors as the—

(1) Seriousness of the cause for debarment or suspension;

(2) Extent of contract performance;

(3) Potential costs to the Government;

(4) Urgency of the requirement and the impact of the delay; and/or

(5) Availability of other safeguards to protect the Government's interests.

649.106 Fraud or other criminal conduct.

If the Contracting Officer (CO) suspects fraud or other criminal conduct related to the settlement of

a terminated contract, the CO shall discontinue negotiations and report the facts to the Office of the

Inspector General.
649.111 Review of proposed settlements.

All proposed termination settlements shall be reviewed and approved by the Office of the Legal

Adviser for legal sufficiency. In addition,

(a) All proposed termination settlements from domestic contracting activities shall be approved by

the head of the contracting activity, with the exception of termination settlements on simplified

acquisitions and no-cost termination settlements; and,

(b) All proposed termination settlements from overseas contracting activities shall be approved by

the Procurement Executive.
160 So.2d 228

#### Oliver C. TAPP v. GUARANTY FINANCE COMPANY, Inc., and Elmer A. Uffman.

No. 47070.

Feb. 14, 1964.

In re: Elmer A. Uffman applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 158 So.2d 228.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal the result is correct.

FOURNET, C. J.,

is of the opinion that the judgment complained of is wrong and the writ prayed for granted. The judgment sought to have annulled was granted by a court of competent jurisdiction aftér proper service of citation was had on the defendant and after default and proper delays, hence could not be set aside except for the causes provided for such actions in Code of Civil Procedure and subject to the one year prescription therein provided.

McCALEB, J., thinks that a writ should be granted, being in accord with the views of FOURNET, C. J.

SANDERS, J., is of the opinion that a writ should be granted on the ground that the one year prescription of Article 2004, LSA-Code of Civil Procedure, is applicable to the action to annul the deficiency judgment.
Exhibit 31.1A

CERTIFICATIONS



I, Randy Granovetter,
certify that:



| | (1) | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of ComHear, Inc.; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|                        | COMHEAR, INC.
|----------------------- | -------------
|                        |              
|Date: September 5, 2014 | By:          
|                        |
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certainPooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2012, by and amongWells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., as Depositor, Wells FargoBank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Certificate Administrator, TaxAdministrator and Custodian, Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank,National Association, as Special Servicer, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as TrustAdvisor and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, with respect toCommercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates WFRBS 2012-C10 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 of thisAgreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Servicesdo hereby certify that:

 

1.       Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.       Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hasexecuted this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells  Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Lewis J. Jones, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Order entered on March 26, 1970 [34 A D 2d 616], vacated. Concur— Capozzoli, J. P., McGivern, Nunez and Steuer, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3210 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3210

    To suspend temporarily the duty on Ethene tetrafluoro-oxidized, 
       polymerized reduced, methyl esters, reduced, ethoxylated.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

Mr. Lautenberg introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on Ethene tetrafluoro-oxidized, 
       polymerized reduced, methyl esters, reduced, ethoxylated.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ETHENE TETRAFLUORO-OXIDIZED, POLYMERIZED REDUCED, METHYL 
              ESTERS, REDUCED, ETHOXYLATED.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.39.18        Ethene tetrafluoro-     Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           oxidized, polymerized                                             31/2009          ''
                           reduced, methyl                                                                     .
                           esters, reduced,
                           ethoxylated (CAS No.
                           162492-15-1)
                           (provided for in
                           subheading
                           3907.20.00)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1003.18 Decision and Order. ( a ) Upon consideration of the petition and other relevant information received or obtained during the proceeding, the OHA will issue a Decision and Order granting or denying the petition and ordering relief as appropriate. The OHA will serve the Decision and Order on the parties to the proceeding and make it available to the public.
( b ) The Decision and Order will set forth its legal basis and the relevant facts, state whether it is a final agency action of the DOE, and state what further review, if any, is available.
( c ) There is no administrative appeal of a Decision and Order, except as provided by federal statute.
----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  /s/ Richard W. McCullough                    |   | March 30, 2011 |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------|
| Richard W. McCullough                              |   |
| Chief Executive Officer                            |   |
| Petroleum Development Corporation (dba PDC Energy) |   |
| Managing General Partner                           |   |
|                                               |   |
|                                               |   |
|  /s/ Gysle R. Shellum                         |   | March 30, 2011 |
| Gysle R. Shellum                                   |   |
| Chief Financial Officer                            |   |
| Petroleum Development Corporation (dba PDC Energy) |   |
| Managing General Partner                           |   |
|                                               |   |

----
Subpart 3052.1—Instructions for Using

Provisions and Clauses

Parent topic: PART 3052—SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES

3052.101 Using part 3052.

(b) Numbering.

(2)(i) Provisions or clauses that supplement the FAR.

(A) Agency-prescribed provisions and clauses permitted by HSAR and used on a standard basis (i.e.,

normally used in two or more solicitations or contracts regardless of contract type) shall be

prescribed and contained in the HSAR. Component desiring to use a provision or a clause on a

standard basis shall submit a request containing a copy of the clause(s), justification for its use, and

evidence of legal counsel review to the CPO in accordance with (HSAR) 48 CFR 3001.304 for

possible inclusion in the HSAR.

(B) Provisions and clauses used on a one-time basis (i.e., non-standard provisions and clauses) may

be approved by the contracting officer, unless a higher level is designated by the Component. This

authority is subject to:

(1) Evidence of legal counsel review in the contract file;

(2) Inserting these clauses in the appropriate sections of the uniform contract format; and

(3) Ensuring the provisions and clauses do not deviate from the requirements of the FAR and HSAR.

Note to 3052.101:

The solicitation provisions and contract clauses matrix referencing all HSAR provisions and clauses

is available at https://www.dhs.gov/publication/hsar-provision-and-clause-matrix.
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 124 

Congratulating Jewish communities on their seven year completion of the 

11th cycle of the daily study of the Talmud. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 1, 2005 

Mr. WEINER (for himself, Mr. NADLER, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. BEAUPREZ, Ms. 

BERKLEY, Mr. BERMAN, Mr. BISHOP of New York, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. CANNON, Mr. CANTOR, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. COX, Mr. CROWLEY, 

Mrs. DAVIS of California, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Ms. DELAURO, Mr. 

ENGEL, Mr. FERGUSON, Mr. FILNER, Mr. FOSSELLA, Mr. GRIJALVA, 

Ms. HARMAN, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. HOLDEN, Mr. HOLT, Mr. ISRAEL, Ms. 

JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Mr. KINGSTON, Mr. LEACH, Mrs. LOWEY, Mrs. 

MALONEY, Mrs. MCCARTHY, Mr. MCCOTTER, Mr. MCNULTY, Mr. 

MENENDEZ, Mr. MICHAUD, Mr. NEY, Mr. NORWOOD, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. 

PENCE, Mr. PORTMAN, Mr. ROTHMAN, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. SAXTON, Ms. 

SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. SCHIFF, Ms. SCHWARTZ of Pennsylvania, Mr. 

SHIMKUS, Mr. SOUDER, Mr. TERRY, Mr. TOWNS, Ms. WASSERMAN

SCHULTZ, Ms. WATSON, Mr. WAXMAN, Mr. WEXLER, Mr. WOLF, and 

Mr. WYNN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform 

MARCH 1, 2005 

The Committee on Government Reform discharged; considered under 

suspension of the rules and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating Jewish communities on their seven year completion of the 11th cycle of the daily study of the Talmud. 
2

•HRES 124 ATH 

Whereas the 11th cycle of the daily learning of the 2,711 

pages in the Babylonian Talmud, through the Daf 

Hayomi study program will culminate on March 1, 2005, 

the 20th day of Adar I 5765 in the Jewish calendar; 

Whereas this will complete a formidable 71⁄2 year educational 

and daily study cycle introduced in 1923 at Agudath 

Israel’s first International Congress in Vienna by Polish 

Rabbi Meir Shapiro, whose purpose was ‘‘to enhance the 

sense of unity of Jews worldwide’’; 

Whereas Jews throughout the world will be celebrating joyously in honor of the celebration, including 120,000 Jews 

in North America, and more than 50,000 in 3 major locations in the New York area will be technologically and 

spiritually linked to hundreds of similar celebrations 

throughout the world; 

Whereas the 10th Daf Yomi cycle was completed on September 28, 1997 with 26,000 people at Madison Square 

Garden linked by satellite to dozens of communities 

around the world; 

Whereas the teachers and students of the Talmud have displayed the remarkable ability to take individual efforts 

and combine them in striving toward a common vision 

and goal; and 

Whereas this monumental achievement in study, dedication, 

perseverance, and persistence is a lesson for contemporary society and for people of good will everywhere: 

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives con2 gratulates the students and teachers of the Daf Yomi pro3 gram on the occasion of their celebration of the completion 
3

•HRES 124 ATH 

1 of the 11th cycle of the Daf Hayomi, and wishes them 

2 well on beginning the 12th cycle.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small Business Administration under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, under Section 309 of the Act and Section 107.1900 of the Small Business Administration Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.1900) to function as a small business investment company under the Small Business Investment Company License No. 02/72-0616 issued to RockMaple Ventures, L.P., and said license is hereby declared null and void as of August 4, 2010.

U.S. Small Business Administration.

Sean J. Greene,

AA/Investment.

[FR Doc. 2010-31152 Filed 12-10-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P