alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov]

Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2014 10:53 AM

To: Wayland, Robertj
Subject: RE: Continuing Discussion from Yesterday

Thanks!

From: Wayland, Robertj [mailto:Wayland.Robertj@epa.gov]

Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2014 10:52 AM

To: Higgins, Cortney
Subject: RE: Continuing Discussion from Yesterday

Cortney –

Since Kevin’s out on leave next week, I scheduled this for tomorrow from noon-1 pm. Discussing the BBs always benefits from Kevin’s perspectives as he has been in most of the meetings with EPA senior management.

thanx!

bob

Robert J. Wayland, Ph.D. Leader, Energy Strategies Group U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Sector Policies and Programs Division
Mail Code D243-01 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 Office: (919) 541-1045 Cell: (919) 306-2290 Fax: (919) 541-5450

Email: wayland.robertj@epa.gov

************************************* DRAFT/Deliberative Document - FOIA Exempt

*************************************From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov]

Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2014 10:00 AM

To: Wayland, Robertj

Cc: Elman, Barry
Subject: RE: Continuing Discussion from Yesterday

Hi Bob,

The following times work for us on a conversation about the remaining building blocks – if one of these times works on your end, can you send an Outlook invite?
4/18: noon-1 4/21: 10-11, 5-6
4/22: 1-2

Thanks, Cortney
IV 

House Calendar No. 20

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 202

[Report No. 109–35] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8) to make the repeal of the 

estate tax permanent. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 12, 2005

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered 

to be printed 

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8) to make 

the repeal of the estate tax permanent.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

3 8) to make the repeal of the estate tax permanent. The 

4 bill shall be considered as read. The previous question 

5 shall be considered as ordered on the bill and on any 

6 amendment thereto to final passage without intervening 

7 motion except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill equally 
2

HRES 202 RH 

1 divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking mi2 nority member of the Committee on Ways and Means; (2) 

3 the amendment in nature of a substitute printed in the 

4 report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this reso5 lution, if offered by Representative Pomeroy of North Da6 kota or his designee, which shall be in order without inter7 vention of any point of order, shall be considered as read, 

8 and shall be separately debatable for one hour equally di9 vided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent; 

10 and (3) one motion to recommit with or without instruc11 tions. 

House Calendar No. 20

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 202

[Report No. 109–35] 

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8) to 

make the repeal of the estate tax permanent. 

APRIL 12, 2005

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
SUBCHAPTER D - SOCIOECONOMIC

PROGRAMS

PART 319 - SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS

PART 322 - APPLICATION OF LABOR LAWS TO GOVERNMENT ACQUISITIONS

PART 323 - ENVIRONMENT, ENERGY AND WATER EFFICIENCY, RENEWABLE

ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY, AND DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE

PART 324 - PROTECTION OF PRIVACY AND FREEDOM OF INFORMATION

PART 326 - OTHER SOCIOECONOMIC PROGRAMS

PART 319 - SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS

Subpart 319.2 - Policies

319.201 General policy.

319.270-1 Mentor Protégé Program Solicitation provision and contract clause.

PART 322 - APPLICATION OF LABOR LAWS TO GOVERNMENT ACQUISITIONS

Subpart 322.8 - Equal Employment Opportunity

322.810 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.

PART 323 - ENVIRONMENT, ENERGY AND WATER EFFICIENCY, RENEWABLE ENERGY

TECHNOLOGIES, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY, AND DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE

323.7000 Scope of subpart.

323.7001 Policy.

323.7002 Actions required.

Subpart 323.71 - Sustainable Acquisition Requirements

323.7100 Policy.

323.7101 Applicability.

323.7102 Procedures.

323.7103 Solicitation Provision.

PART 324 - PROTECTION OF PRIVACY AND FREEDOM OF INFORMATION

Subpart 324.1 - Protection of Individual Privacy

324.103 Procedures for the Privacy Act.

324.104 Restrictions on Contractor Access to Government or Third Party

Information.

324.105 Contract clauses.

Subpart 324.70 - Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996

324.7000 Scope of subpart.

324.7001 Policy on Compliance with HIPAA business associate contract

requirements.

PART 326 - OTHER SOCIOECONOMIC PROGRAMS

Subpart 326.5 - Indian Preference in Employment, Training, and Subcontracting

Opportunities

326.501 Statutory requirements.

326.502 Definitions.

326.503 Compliance enforcement.

326.504 Tribal preference requirements.

326.505 Applicability.

Subpart 326.6 - Acquisitions Under the Buy Indian Act

326.600 General.

326.600-1 Scope of part.
326.600-2 Buy Indian Act acquisition regulations.

326.601 Definitions.

326.602 Applicability.

326.602-1 Scope of part.

326.602-2 Restrictions on the use of the Buy Indian Act.

326.603 Policy.

326.603-1 Requirement to give preference to Indian Economic Enterprises.

326.603-2 Delegations and responsibility.

326.603-3 Deviations.

326.604 Procedures.

326.604-1 General.

326.604-2 Procedures for Acquisitions under the Buy Indian Act.

326.604-3 Debarment and suspension.

326.605 Contract Requirements.

326.605-1 Subcontracting limitations.

326.605-2 Performance and payment bonds.

326.606 Representation by an Indian Economic Enterprise Offeror.

326.606-1 General.

326.606-2 Representation provision.

326.606-3 Representation process.

326.607 Challenges to Representation.

326.607-1 Procedure.

326.607-2 Receipt of Challenge.

326.607-3 Award in the Face of Challenge.

326.607-4 Challenge Not Timely.

Subpart 326.7 - Acquisitions Requiring the Native American Graves Protection and

Repatriation Act

326.700 Scope of subpart.

326.701 Applicability.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CR. NO. 3:06cr199-MEF

 ) 

ANTHONY SANFORD )

MOTION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD PROSEQUENDUM

TO THE HONORABLE _________________, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JUDGE:

Comes now the United States of America, by and through its Attorney for the Middle District

of Alabama, and represents and shows unto the Court that there is pending in the United States

District Court for the Middle District of Alabama an Indictment against Anthony Sanford, now in

custody of St. Clair Correctional Facility, Springville, Alabama, and that said cause is set for

arraignment at Montgomery, Alabama, in this Honorable Court on August 13, 2008, at 10:30 a.m.

WHEREFORE, the United States Attorney prays that your Honor will direct theClerk of this

Court to issue a WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD PROSEQUENDUM addressed to Warden, St.

Clair Correctional Facility, Springville, Alabama, commanding him to deliver said prisoner to any

United States Marshal or Deputy United States Marshal and directing said Marshal or Deputy to

bring said prisoner before this Honorable Court to be held at Montgomery, Alabama, on August 13,

2008, at 10:30 a.m. 

Respectfully submitted this the 25th day of June, 2008.

Respectfully submitted,

LEURA G. CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/Kent B. Brunson

KENT B. BRUNSON

Assistant United States Attorney

 131 Clayton Street

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334) 223-7280

Fax: (334) 223-7135

E-mail: kent.brunson@usdoj.gov

Case 3:06-cr-00199-MEF-CSC Document 7 Filed 06/25/2008 Page 1 of 1
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 3:06cr199-MEF

 ) 

ANTHONY SANFORD )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the motion for writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum filed June 25,

2008, and for good cause shown, it is

ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. The Clerk of this Court is hereby DIRECTED

to issue a WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD PROSEQUENDUM addressed to St. Clair Correctional

Facility, Springville, Alabama, commanding them to deliver Anthony Sanford to any United States

Marshal or Deputy United States Marshal, and directing said Marshal or Deputy to bring said

prisoner before this court to be held at Montgomery, Alabama, on August 13, 2008, at 10:30 a.m.

and to return the prisoner to said official when the court shall have finished with him.

DONE this _____ day of June, 2008.

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cr-00199-MEF-CSC Document 7-2 Filed 06/25/2008 Page 1 of 1
§ 1008.18 Accounting for disclosures. ( a ) For each disclosure of information contained in a system of records under his control, except disclosures to authorized officers and employees of DOE and disclosures required by the Freedom of Information Act, the appropriate System Manager shall keep an accurate accounting of: ( 1 ) The date, nature, and purposes of each disclosure of a record made to any person or to another agency; and
( 2 ) The name and address of the person or agency to which the disclosure was made.
( b ) The accounting shall be retained for at least five years or the life of the record, whichever is longer, after the disclosure for which the accounting is made.
( c ) The accounting described in paragraph (a) of this section shall be made available to the individual named in the record upon written request to the Privacy Act Officer at the appropriate DOE location listed at § 1008.2(c) of this part. However, the accounting shall not be revealed with respect to disclosures made under § 1008.17(b)(7) of this part, pertaining to law enforcement activity; or with respect to disclosures involving system of records for which DOE had claimed an exemption from certain requirements of the Act, as provided in § 1008.12 of this part.
( d ) Whenever an amendment or correction of a record or a notation of dispute concerning the accuracy of records is made by the DOE in accordance with §§ 1008.10(a)(2)(iv) and 1008.11(g) of this part, DOE shall inform any person or other agency to whom the record was previously disclosed if an accounting of the disclosure was made pursuant to the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section, unless the disclosure was made pursuant to § 1008.17(b)(7) of this part; or the disclosure involved a system of records of which DOE has claimed an exemption from certain requirements of the Act, as provided in § 1008.12 of this part.
( e ) The System Manager shall make reasonable efforts to serve notice on an individual when any record containing information about such individual in a DOE system of records is disclosed to any person under compulsory legal process when such process becomes a matter of public record.
( f ) Prior to disclosing any record about an individual to any person other than an agency, unless the disclosure is pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, the System Manager shall make reasonable efforts to assure that each record is accurate, complete, timely, and relevant for DOE's purposes.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CRIMINAL ACTION NO.

) 2:06cr206-MHT

ALETHIA ADRIANNE SCOTT )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the letter-motions to reduce

sentence (Doc. Nos. 70 & 71) are denied.

DONE, this the 27th day of September, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00206-MHT-CSC Document 72 Filed 09/27/2007 Page 1 of 1
EX-34.3
(logo) plante
       moran


Plante & Moran, PLLC
Suite 2700
225 W. Washington St.
Chicago, IL 60606
Tel: 312.899.4460
Fax: 312.726.3262
plantemoran.com

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors
National Tax Search, LLC

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Management's Report on Assessment of Compliance with Securities and Exchange
Commission's Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that National Tax Search, LLC
(the "Company") complied with certain servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d) of the Security and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the
National Tax Search TaxQ system (the "Platform") as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2012. The Company has determined that only certain servicing
criteria, 1122(d)(1)(ii), 1122(d)1(iv), 1122(d)2(ii), 1122(d)2(v),
1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)2(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii), are
applicable to the activities performed by it with respect to the Platform
covered by this report. The Company has determined that the remaining servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable
to the activities performed by it with respect to the Platform covered by this
report.

Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those servicing
criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion
about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our
examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance
with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as
we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included a
selection of a sample of transactions and compliance activities related to the
Platform during the examination period and determining whether the Company
processed those transactions and performed those activities in compliance with
the servicing criteria. Our testing of selected transactions and compliance
activities was limited to calculations, reports, and activities performed by
the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures did not
include determining whether errors may have occurred prior to our tests that
may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company
during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any
other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the
Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31,
2012 for the Platform is fairly stated in all material respects.


/s/Plante & Moran, PLLC


Chicago, IL
February 8, 2013


Praxity
MEMBER
GLOBAL ALLIANCE OF
INDEPENDENT FIRMS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

 Supreme Court No. DA 21-0582 

KIM NORQUAY, JR., 

 

 Petitioner and Appellant, 

 v. 

STATE OF MONTANA, 

 Respondent and Appellee. 

 

GRANT OF EXTENSION

 Counsel for Appellant Kim Norquay, Jr., has filed an unopposed 

motion seeking a 30-day extension of the briefing deadlines in this 

matter. Counsel asserts the continuance is necessary because, upon 

review of the record, he has determined he has a conflict of interest and 

is no longer able to represent the Appellant in this matter. 

Consequently, the Appellate will require new counsel. Once located, 

that counsel will require additional time to review the record and 

prepare the Appellant’s Opening Brief. 

 The State does not object to the Motion. 

03/30/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0582
 THEREFORE, the Motion is Granted. The Opening Brief in this 

Matter, currently due on April 4, 2022, is now due on May 4, 2022. The 

Office of the Appellate Defender is directed to locate new counsel for 

this Appellant. 

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 30 2022
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 241 (Thursday, December 16, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 78705]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31617]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than January 10, 2011.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (E. Ann Worthy, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Connemara Bancorp, Inc., Dallas, Texas; to become a bank holding 
company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of First Amherst 
Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of First 
National Bank, both in Amherst, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 13, 
2010.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-31617 Filed 12-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Exhibit 4.1


  


	NUMBER	 	INNOVATE	 	SHARES
	 	BIOPHARMACEUTICALS	 
	 	 	 	 	CUSIP 45782F 10 5
	 	 	 	 	 
	             	 	 	 	SEE REVERSE FOR
	 	 	 	 	CERTAIN DEFINITIONS





 


INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF DELAWARE


 


AUTHORIZED: 350,000,000 COMMON SHARES,


$0.0001 PAR VALUE PER SHARE


 


THIS CERTIFIES THATSPECIMEN


 


is the owner of 


 


 


Fully Paid and Non-Assessable Common
Stock, $0.0001 Par Value of 


 


INNOVATE BIOPHARMACEUTICALS, INC.


 


transferable on the books of this Corporation
in person or by attorney upon surrender of this Certificate duly endorsed or assigned. This Certificate and the shares represented
hereby are subject to the laws of the State of Delaware, and to the Articles of Incorporation and the Bylaws of the Corporation,
as now or hereafter amended. This Certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation
has caused this Certificate to be signed by the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers and to be sealed with the
facsimile seal of the Corporation.


 


	Dated:	 	 
	/s/ Jay Madan	 	/s/ Kendyle Woodard
	President	 	Secretary


 


[INNOVATE BIOPHARMACEUTICALS, INC., CORPORATE
SEAL OF DELAWARE]


 


COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED:


CORPORATE STOCK TRANSFER, INC.


TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR


 


By


 


Authorized Signature


 


 




     


     


    

 


(REVERSE SIDE)


 


INNOVATE BIOPHARMACEUTICALS, INC.


 


CORPORATE STOCK TRANSFER, INC.


 


TRANSFER FEE: AS REQUIRED


 


The following
abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out
in full according to applicable laws or regulations:


 


TEN COM - as tenants in common


TEN ENT - as tenants by the entireties


JT TEN - as joint tenants with
right of survivorship and not as and not as tenants in common


 


UNIF GIFT MIN ACT _Custodian_______


(Cust) (Minor)


under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act


 


Act__________


(State)


 


 


 


 


Additional abbreviations may
also be used though not in the above list. 


 






 



 


PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY
OR OTHER 


      IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE


  


	 









 


 


	FOR VALUE RECEIVED,	 	 hereby
sell, assign and transfer unto









 


 


 






PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND
ADDRESS INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE


 





 



 

 




 



  





	 	Shares







of the Common Stock represented by the within Certificate and
do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint


 





	 	Attorney to transfer







the said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation,
with full power of substitution in the premises.


 


Dated: _________________20_______


 


 


	 	Signature: X 	 
	Signature(s) Guaranteed:	 
	 	Signature: X 	 


 


THE SIGNATURE(S) TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH
THE NAME(S) AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE