alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

**Citizens Financial Corp.**

**Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002**

I, Robert J. Schoonover, President and Chief Executive Officer of Citizens Financial Corp., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Citizens Financial Corp; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results in operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: 5/10/06 

 

 

42
OFFICE OFTHE ATTORNEY GENERALOFTEXAS AUSTIN u c. MAW" omne.*- I @ ,

i\ ofyour letter of plnlon al0 follow-

-t of tale Oxa8# has about one glalon tin earl@, The Frlacn ?3pItenL aOe heed to exchange prooeseed for t&me ofme. ontrol baye the authority

of Control is given 

### avery g0nercbl ous (Lopartments,boards, institutions offices of the state with respect to fisea1 ati econanic nattexw. Se0 drt. 603 Rev. C&y. Stat.

The Board fe especiallg mt&orizsCt *to make eontracts aft& t&e State Prison Board for the gxrchaee of supplios,r * * 3.IlclWng;food.,* * 0 and all otiep supi>llOS01'clfricultural0X'mUUifaCt~sd pSOduOti, * * l Per ~60 af tha"Statt2io any of Its dcpnrtliumts,Con~~aeions, b~arils,0ffioos or ~lesmosynary or odwatlonal institutioas.~ Rey.CI~.St~t.,Ve~Onte CO&.,&t. 834 l/a. 

### 684

## 685

Honorable Tm DollfWrg- Page S

Article 666 of the Ravfmed Civil Btatutes de

### claros I ~Tho State Iloardof Control ahall haye charge and control,of sll prbllo buildings, grounds and property of the atate, and is the ouotodian of all publiO persOnal prOperty, erdfis ahaqed with the reeponsibillt~ to properly 

### oar0forand**potfmt au** * **pqer +%**  

### from**damage, instrueion**  **or improper**  **uerge. In**  **sur opi!dou**  **BO. o-z376**  **we**

### aoIlotrllea **this** statute, 'to suthorise the Board of Control to oooept from any State deprtmsat Or inst~tUti6n Under its 00~ trol supplicseand equ%pImnt no louger usable or lsbeded for **uere**

by **such**departwant **or inetitutfon,**  **and to**  plsse the 6wut3In the hamU of any 

### other department or in&itution 

### haying need 

### of the saw (at least temporarily, If not permanently) vhere such axahanga is oltually satiefaotory to the two departments or InstitutiOns concerned, as an act of 

### oomemticm under the gepsral pouer above oonferred on the Board,*

upon these oonalderations you are reepwtfully ad~ised~~tis the opbion 

### of th&nde~tmentthatths mard of Goutrol do06 brve the aUtfiO&ty to 8p~OYe the -hang9 suggested in your 1Ilttr of in*.
52.234-2 Notice of Earned Value

Management System-Preaward Integrated

Baseline Review.

As prescribed in 34.203 (a) use the following provision:

Notice of Earned Value Management System-Preaward Integrated Baseline Review. (Nov 2016)

(a) The offeror shall provide documentation that the Cognizant Federal Agency has determined that

the proposed earned value management system (EVMS) complies with the EVMS guidelines in

Electronic Industries Alliance Standard 748(EIA-748) (current version at time of solicitation).

(b) If the offeror proposes to use a system that has not been determined to be in compliance with the

requirements of paragraph (a) of this provision, the offeror shall submit a comprehensive plan for

compliance with the EVMS guidelines.

(1) The plan shall-

(i) (i) Describe the EVMS the offeror intends to use in performance of the contracts;

(ii) Distinguish between the offeror’s existing management system and modifications proposed to

meet the guidelines;

(iii) (iii) Describe the management system and its application in terms of the EVMS guidelines;

(iv) (iv) Describe the proposed procedure for administration of the guidelines, as applied to

subcontractors; and

(v) (v) Provide documentation describing the process and results of any third-party or self-evaluation

of the system’s compliance with the EVMS guidelines.

(2) The offeror shall provide information and assistance as required by the Contracting Officer to

support review of the plan.

(3) The Government will review and approve the offeror’s plan for an EVMS before contract award.

(4) The offeror’s EVMS plan must provide milestones that indicate when the offeror anticipates that

the EVM system will be compliant with the EIA-748 guidelines.

(c) Offerors shall identify the major subcontractors, or major subcontracted effort if major

subcontractors have not been selected subject to the guidelines. The prime Contractor and the

Government shall agree to subcontractors selected for application of the EVMS guidelines.

(d) The Government will conduct an Integrated Baseline Review (IBR), as designated by the agency,

prior to contract award. The objective of the IBR is for the Government and the Contractor to jointly

assess technical areas, such as the Contractor’s planning, to ensure complete coverage of the

contract requirements, logical scheduling of the work activities, adequate resources, methodologies

for earned value (budgeted cost for work performed (BCWP)), and identification of inherent risks.
(End of provision)

Parent topic: 52.234 [Reserved]
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 2.1301 Public notice of receipt of a license transfer application. ( a ) The Commission will notice the receipt of each application for direct or indirect transfer of a specific NRC license by placing a copy of the application at the NRC Web site, *http://www.nrc.gov .*
( b ) The Commission will also publish in the Federal Register a notice of receipt of an application for approval of a license transfer involving 10 CFR part 50 and part 52 licenses, major fuel cycle facility licenses issued under part 70, or part 72 licenses. This notice constitutes the notice required by § 2.105 with respect to all matters related to the application requiring NRC approval.
( c ) Periodic lists of applications received may be obtained upon request addressed to the NRC Public Document Room, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.
[63 FR 66730, Dec. 3, 1998, as amended at 64 FR 48949, Sept. 9, 1999]
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 50 Filed 02/28/2007 Page 1 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 50 Filed 02/28/2007 Page 2 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 50 Filed 02/28/2007 Page 3 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 50 Filed 02/28/2007 Page 4 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 50 Filed 02/28/2007 Page 5 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 50 Filed 02/28/2007 Page 6 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 50 Filed 02/28/2007 Page 7 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 50 Filed 02/28/2007 Page 8 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 50 Filed 02/28/2007 Page 9 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 50 Filed 02/28/2007 Page 10 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 50 Filed 02/28/2007 Page 11 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 50 Filed 02/28/2007 Page 12 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 50 Filed 02/28/2007 Page 13 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 50 Filed 02/28/2007 Page 14 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 50 Filed 02/28/2007 Page 15 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 50 Filed 02/28/2007 Page 16 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 50 Filed 02/28/2007 Page 17 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 50 Filed 02/28/2007 Page 18 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 50 Filed 02/28/2007 Page 19 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 50 Filed 02/28/2007 Page 20 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 50 Filed 02/28/2007 Page 21 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 50 Filed 02/28/2007 Page 22 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 50 Filed 02/28/2007 Page 23 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 50 Filed 02/28/2007 Page 24 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 50 Filed 02/28/2007 Page 25 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 50 Filed 02/28/2007 Page 26 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 50 Filed 02/28/2007 Page 27 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 50 Filed 02/28/2007 Page 28 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 50 Filed 02/28/2007 Page 29 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 50 Filed 02/28/2007 Page 30 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 50 Filed 02/28/2007 Page 31 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 50 Filed 02/28/2007 Page 32 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 50 Filed 02/28/2007 Page 33 of 34
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 50 Filed 02/28/2007 Page 34 of 34
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) Case No. 3:06CR208-MEF

)

JASON EDWARD COFIELD )

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER

A pretrial conference was held on October 13, 2006 before the undersigned

Magistrate Judge. Present at this conference was the Honorable C. Pate DeBardeleben,

counsel for the defendant, and Assistant United States Attorney Verne Speirs, counsel for the

government. As a result of the conference, it is

ORDERED as follows:

1. Jury selection is set for November 27, 2006. The trial of this case is set for the

trial term commencing on November 27, 2006 before Chief United States District Judge

Mark E. Fuller and is expected to last one trial day.

2. The following motion is pending: Defendant’s Motion to Suppress. An

evidentiary hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Suppress is set for October 27, 2006 at 9:00

a.m.

3. Proposed voir dire questions shall be filed on or before November 20, 2006.

Counsel should not include questions seeking information which is provided in the jury

questionnaire.

Case 3:06-cr-00208-MEF-CSC Document 24 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 1 of 2
4. All Motions in Limine shall be filed on or before November 20, 2006. Motions

in Limine must be accompanied by a brief. Failure to file a brief will result in denial of the

motion.

5. Proposed jury instructions shall be filed on or before November 20, 2006.

6. The court will not consider a plea pursuant to Rule 11(c) (1)(A) or (C) unless

notice is filed on or before noon on November 15, 2006. The government and defendant

are informed that if a defendant waits until the last minute to enter a plea, and if that plea, for

whatever reason, is not accepted by the court, the defendant and the government will be

expected to be prepared to go to trial on November 27, 2006. The court will not continue

the trial of this case as to any defendant because a defendant’s plea was not accepted. In

other words, the defendant and the government should not wait until the last minute for a

defendant to enter a guilty plea, and both the defendant and the government should all be

ready to go to trial on November 27, 2006, as to all defendants, even though a particular

guilty plea was not accepted by the court.

Done this 16 day of October, 2006. th

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cr-00208-MEF-CSC Document 24 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 2 of 2
1503.1071 Contract clause.       Contracting Officers, with advisement from the program office, must insert the contract clause at 1552.203-72 - *Scientific Integrity,* in solicitations and contracts when the Contractor may be required to perform, communicate, or supervise scientific activities, or use scientific information to perform advisory and assistance services. Examples of such scientific activities include, but are not limited to, computer modeling, economic analysis, field sampling, laboratory experimentation, demonstrating new technology, statistical analysis, and writing a review article on a scientific issue.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1503.10 - Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct
Atrazine Monitoring Program 

Mattoon, Illinois 

PWSID: IL0290250

 

Atrazine Concentration

Sample Date

Raw 

Water 

Atrazine

(ppb)

Raw Water 

Method of 

Analysis

Finished 

Water 

Atrazine

(ppb)

Finished 

Water 

Method of 

Analysis

10-Apr-07 0.03 LCMS-2* 0.03 LCMS-2* 

16-Apr-07 0.14 LCMS-2 0.16 LCMS-2 

23-Apr-07 0.32 LCMS-2 0.07 LCMS-2 

30-Apr-07 0.33 LCMS-2 0.10 LCMS-2 

7-May-07 0.31 LCMS-2 0.17 LCMS-2 

14-May-07 0.25 LCMS-2 0.27 LCMS-2 

21-May-07 0.43 LCMS-2 0.31 LCMS-2 

29-May-07 0.31 LCMS-2 0.31 LCMS-2 

4-Jun-07 0.47 LCMS-2 0.03 LCMS-2* 

13-Jun-07 0.49 LCMS-2 0.12 LCMS-2 

18-Jun-07 0.38 LCMS-2 0.15 LCMS-2 

25-Jun-07 0.34 LCMS-2 0.25 LCMS-2 

2-Jul-07 0.34 LCMS-2 0.03 LCMS-2* 

9-Jul-07 0.36 LCMS-2 0.03 LCMS-2* 

23-Jul-07 0.34 LCMS-2 0.37 LCMS-2 

30-Jul-07 0.43 LCMS-2 0.03 LCMS-2* 

13-Aug-07 0.36 LCMS-2 0.03 LCMS-2* 

30-Aug-07 0.35 LCMS-2 0.32 LCMS-2 

10-Sep-07 0.32 LCMS-2 0.32 LCMS-2 

24-Sep-07 0.33 LCMS-2 0.09 LCMS-2 

10-Oct-07 0.31 LCMS-2 0.03 LCMS-2* 

22-Oct-07 0.29 LCMS-2 0.03 LCMS-2* 

5-Nov-07 0.25 LCMS-2 0.20 LCMS-2 

26-Nov-07 0.32 LCMS-2 0.03 LCMS-2* 

3-Dec-07 0.20 LCMS-2 0.11 LCMS-2 

Avg. of Qtrly 

Means 0.31 0.13 

*Indicates a non-detection or residue below the method's Limit of Quantitation (LOQ). For purposes of charting and calculation,

1/2 the method LOQ was used. The Immunoassay (IA) atrazine LOQ was 0.10 ppb. The Gas Chromatographic/Mass Selective 

Detection method (GC/MS) LOQ was 0.1 ppb.The Liquid Chromatography / Mass Spectrometry / Mass Spectrometry (LC/MS) 

LOQ was typically 0.05-0.10 ppb. 

The time-weighted (TW) period mean is an average of quarterly averages. 

Printed: 1/14/2009
Case 2:06-cr-00193-MEF-CSC Document 2 Filed 07/24/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### § 207.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this subpart is to set forth the manner in which energy information which the Administrator is authorized to obtain by sections 11 (a) and (b) of ESECA will be collected.
Subpart 2002.1 - Definitions    **Parent topic:** PART 2002 - DEFINITIONS2002.100 Definitions.       *Agency* means the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).          *Agency Head* or *Head of the Agency* means the NRC Executive Director for Operations, for the purposes specified in the regulations in this chapter and the FAR. This delegation does not extend to internal NRC requirements such as clearance levels and Commission papers which specify higher levels of authority.          *Commission* means the NRC Commission of five members, or a quorum thereof, sitting as a body, as provided by Section 201 of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5841).          *Competition Advocate* means the individual appointed as such by the Agency Head as required by Public Law 98-369. The Director, Division of Contracts and Property Management, has been appointed the Competition Advocate for the NRC.          *Head of the Contracting Activity* means the Director, Division of Contracts and Property Management.          *Senior Procurement Executive* means the individual appointed as such by the Agency Head pursuant to Executive Order 12352. The Deputy Executive Director for Management Services, has been appointed the NRC Senior Procurement Executive.          *Simplified acquisitions* means those acquisitions conducted using the methods, policies, and procedures of FAR part 13 for making purchases of supplies or services.          *Task and Delivery Order Ombudsman* means the Director, Division of Contracts and Property Management, or designee pursuant to section 1004(a) of Pub. L. 103-355, the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act.
#### COLTON, Respondent, v. POTTER, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

July 1, 1914.)

Action by Claude Colton against Fred B. Potter.

No opinion. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. See, also, 156 App. Div. 880, 140 N. Y. Supp. 1114.
Case 1:06-cr-00170-WHA-CSC Document 214 Filed 10/12/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 3:06-cr-00210-MEF-CSC Document 20 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 1 of 9
Case 3:06-cr-00210-MEF-CSC Document 20 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 2 of 9
Case 3:06-cr-00210-MEF-CSC Document 20 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 3 of 9
Case 3:06-cr-00210-MEF-CSC Document 20 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 4 of 9
Case 3:06-cr-00210-MEF-CSC Document 20 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 5 of 9
Case 3:06-cr-00210-MEF-CSC Document 20 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 6 of 9
Case 3:06-cr-00210-MEF-CSC Document 20 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 7 of 9
Case 3:06-cr-00210-MEF-CSC Document 20 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 8 of 9
Case 3:06-cr-00210-MEF-CSC Document 20 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 9 of 9
2827.303 Contract clauses.       The SPE is the agency head for the purposes of FAR 27.303(e)(4).    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2827.3 - Patent Rights Under Government Contracts
2032.402 General.

(a) The contracting officer has the responsibility and authority for making findings and

determinations and for approval of contract terms concerning advance payments.

(b) Before authorizing any advance payment agreements, except for subscriptions to publications,

the contracting officer shall coordinate with the Office of the Chief Financial Officer, Division of

Accounting and Finance, to ensure completeness of contractor submitted documentation.

Parent topic: Subpart 2032.4 - Advance Payments for Non-Commercial Items
# SUBCHAPTER D - SOCIOECONOMIC PROGRAMS

- PART 2918 [RESERVED] 
- PART 2919 - SMALL BUSINESS AND SMALL DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS CONCERNS 
- PARTS 2920-2921 [RESERVED] 
- PART 2922 - APPLICATION OF LABOR LAWS TO GOVERNMENT ACQUISITIONS 
- PART 2923 - ENVIRONMENT, ENERGY AND WATER EFFICIENCY, RENEWABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY, AND DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE 
- PARTS 2924-2927 [RESERVED] 

- PART 2918 [RESERVED]   
- PART 2919 - SMALL BUSINESS AND SMALL DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS CONCERNS    - 2919.000   Scope of part.
  - Subpart 2919.2 - Policies     - 2919.201   General policy.
    - 2919.202   Specific policies.
    - 2919.202-1   Encouraging small business participation in acquisitions.
    - 2919.202-2   Locating small business sources.
  - Subpart 2919.5 - Set-Asides for Small Business     - 2919.502   Setting aside acquisitions.
    - 2919.505   Rejecting Small Business Administration recommendations.
  - Subpart 2919.7 - The Small Business Subcontracting Program     - 2919.704   Subcontracting plan requirements.
    - 2919.705-1   General support for the program.
    - 2919.705-5   Awards involving subcontracting plans.
    - 2919.705-6   Post-award responsibilities of the contracting officer.
    - 2919.706   Responsibilities of the cognizant administrative contracting officer.
  - Subpart 2919.8 - Contracting with the Small Business Administration (The 8(a) Program)     - 2919.812   Contract administration.
- PARTS 2920-2921 [RESERVED]    
- PART 2922 - APPLICATION OF LABOR LAWS TO GOVERNMENT ACQUISITIONS     - Subpart 2922.1 - Basic Labor Policies     - 2922.101-3   Reporting labor disputes.
    - 2922.101-4   Removal of items from contractor facilities affected by work stoppages.
    - 2922.103-4   Approvals.
  - Subpart 2922.8 - Equal Employment Opportunity     - 2922.802   General.
- PART 2923 - ENVIRONMENT, ENERGY AND WATER EFFICIENCY, RENEWABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY, AND DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE     - Subpart 2923.2 - Energy And Water Efficiency and Renewable Energy     - 2923.271   Purchase and use of environmentally sound and energy efficient products and services.
- PARTS 2924-2927 [RESERVED]
§ 799.16 Scoping. ( a ) FSA will determine the appropriate scoping process for the environmental review of a proposed action based on the nature, complexity, potential significance of effects, and level of controversy of the proposed action.
( b ) As part of its scoping process, FSA will: ( 1 ) Invite appropriate Federal, State, and Tribal governments, and other interested parties to participate in the process, if determined necessary by FSA;
( 2 ) Identify the significant issues to be analyzed;
( 3 ) Identify and eliminate from further review issues that were determined not significant or have been adequately addressed in any prior environmental reviews;
( 4 ) Determine the roles of lead and cooperating agencies, if appropriate;
( 5 ) Identify any related EAs or EISs;
( 6 ) Identify other environmental reviews and consultation requirements, including NHPA requirements and State, local, regional, and Tribal requirements, so they are integrated into the NEPA process;
( 7 ) Identify the relationship between the timing of the environmental review process and FSA's decision making process;
( 8 ) Determine points of contact within FSA; and
( 9 ) Establish time limits for the environmental review process.
( c ) FSA may hold public meetings as part of the scoping process, if appropriate and as time permits. The process that FSA will use to determine if a public scoping meeting is needed, and how such meetings will be announced, is specified in § 799.17.
Case 2:06-cr-00209-MHT-CSC Document 20 Filed 10/10/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cr-00196-MHT-CSC Document 26 Filed 12/22/2006 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00196-MHT-CSC Document 26 Filed 12/22/2006 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00196-MHT-CSC Document 26 Filed 12/22/2006 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00196-MHT-CSC Document 26 Filed 12/22/2006 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00196-MHT-CSC Document 26 Filed 12/22/2006 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00196-MHT-CSC Document 26 Filed 12/22/2006 Page 6 of 6
#### § 905.81 Compliance.

Except as provided in this part, no person shall ship fruit the shipment of which has been prohibited by the Secretary in accordance with the provisions of this part.