alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex_107774.htm


EXHIBIT 10.24


FIRST US BANCSHARES, INC.


and


FIRST US BANK


 


Board and Committee Fee Schedule


 


 


 


First US Bancshares, Inc. Fees to Non-Employee Directors Monthly:


Non-Employee Directors                                                        $600


Chairperson                                                                             $1,350 ($600 + $750)


            Attendance Fees                                                                     $500 Per Meeting Attended


 


First US Bank Board Fees Monthly:


Non-Employee Directors                                                        $400


 


Committee Fees, Paid Per Meeting Attended:


Non-Employee Directors of All Committees                         $250 Per Meeting Attended


            Chairperson of the following Committees:                             $400 Per Meeting Attended


            Executive, Nominating & Corporate Governance                 


            Audit


            Compensation                                    


            Directors’ Loan


            Retail, Operation, Technology, Compliance


            Directors’ Asset Liability


                        Acceptance Loan Company, Inc. Board


 


Board Fees for Directors of Acceptance Loan Company, Inc. and FUSB Reinsurance, Inc.:


            Non-Employee Directors                                                        $250 Per Meeting Attended


 


Mileage:  


Any non-employee director attending a board, committee, or special meeting outside the county in which he/she resides will be paid mileage at the Bank’s rate.


 


Other Expense:


Any non-employee director that may incur expense for travel, customer entertainment or other such bank-related expense shall complete the Bank’s standard reimbursement claim form and submit it to the CEO.  If approved by the CEO, the non-employee director will be reimbursed for such bank-related expense according to existing Bank policy.


 


Any non-employee director attending a training meeting, or similar meeting, will be compensated as attending a committee meeting ($250).


 


Meetings may be attended in person or via conference call.
IV 

House Calendar No. 236 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1042 

[Report No. 109–688] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6166) to amend title 10, United 

States Code, to authorize trial by military commission for violations 

of the law of war, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 26, 2006 

Mr. COLE of Oklahoma, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 

resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6166) to amend 

title 10, United States Code, to authorize trial by military commission for violations of the law of war, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order without intervention of any point of 

3 order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 6166) to 

4 amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize trial by 

5 military commission for violations of the law of war, and 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

HRES 1042 RH 

1 for other purposes. The amendment printed in the report 

2 of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution 

3 shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall 

4 be considered as read. The previous question shall be con5 sidered as ordered on the bill, as amended, to final passage 

6 without intervening motion except: (1) two hours of de7 bate, with 80 minutes equally divided and controlled by 

8 the chairman and ranking minority member of the Com9 mittee on Armed Services and 40 minutes equally divided 

10 and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority 

11 member of the Committee on the Judiciary; and (2) one 

12 motion to recommit with or without instructions. 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS

hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
House Calendar No. 236 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1042 

[Report No. 109

–688] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6166) 

the law of war, and for other purposes. ize trial by military commission for violations of to amend title 10, United States Code, to authorSEPTEMBER 26, 2006 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on November 2, 2010, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Wireless Industrial Technology Konsortium, Inc. (“WITECK”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Software Technologies Group, Westchester, IL, has withdrawn as a party to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and WITECK intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On August 8, 2008, WITECK filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the                           ( print page 79026)                        Act on September 18, 2008 (73 FR 54170).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on March 12, 2010. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on April 16, 2010 (75 FR 20003).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2010-31592 Filed 12-16-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
2903.602 Exceptions.

(a) In accordance with FAR 3.602, only when there is a most compelling reason to do so, is the

Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management authorized to except a contract from the

policy in FAR 3.601, after the Procurement Review Board and the agency ethics official have

reviewed and recommended approval of the exception. However, when time does not permit, the

Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management may unilaterally approve an exception. The

exception and information supporting the exception must be provided to the contracting officer for

their official records.

(b) When an exception under this subpart is requested, it is submitted through the director of the

cognizant program office to the HCA. In the procurement request, the director must describe the

basis for the exception from the restrictions of FAR 3.601.

(c) Except as allowed in paragraph (a) of this section, the Department of Labor may enter into a

negotiated contract or an amendment to an existing contract with former employees of DOL within

one year of separation (or with firms in which former employees are known to have a substantial

interest) only after review and recommendation for approval by the agency ethics official, the

Procurement Review Board, and written approval by the Assistant Secretary for Administration and

Management.

(d) Approval of a decision to grant an exception as provided in this section must be documented by a

written findings and determination prepared by the requesting official for signature by the Assistant

Secretary for Administration and Management. The determination and findings must document

compliance with FAR 3.603, FAR 9.5 and DOLAR 2909.5; specify the compelling reason(s) for award;

and be placed in the contract files and the files of the Policy Review Board.

Parent topic: Subpart 2903.6 - Contracts With Government Employees or Organizations Owned or

Controlled by Them
§ 1049.4 Arrest authority. ( a ) Under the Act, the authority of a DOE Protective Force Officer to arrest without warrant is to be exercised only in the performance of official duties of protecting the SPR and persons within or upon the SPR.
( b ) A Protective Force Officer is authorized to make an arrest for a felony committed in violation of laws of the United States, or for a misdemeanor committed in violation of laws of the United States if the offense is committed in the officer's presence.
( c ) A Protective Force Officer also is authorized to make an arrest for a felony committed in violation of laws of the United States if the Officer has reasonably grounds to believe that the felony has been committed, or that the suspect is committing the felony, and is in the immediate area of the felony or is fleeing the immediate area of the felony. “Reasonable grounds to believe” means that the facts and circumstances within the knowledge of the Protective Force Officer at the moment of arrest, and of which the Protective Force Officer has reasonably trustworthy information, would be sufficient to cause a prudent person to believe that the suspect had committed or was committing a felony.
Case 2:06-cv-00650-MEF-SRW Document 11 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00650-MEF-SRW Document 11 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00650-MEF-SRW Document 11 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 3 of 3
SUBCHAPTER A - GENERAL

PART 400 [RESERVED]

PART 401 - AGRICULTURE ACQUISITION REGULATION SYSTEM

PART 402 - DEFINITIONS OF WORDS AND TERMS

PART 403 - IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF

INTEREST

PART 404 - ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS

PART 400 [RESERVED]

PART 401 - AGRICULTURE ACQUISITION REGULATION SYSTEM

401.000 Scope of part.

Subpart 401.1 - Purpose, Authority, Issuance

401.101 Purpose.

401.103 Authority.

401.104 Applicability.

401.105 Issuance.

401.105-1 Publication and code arrangement.

401.105-2 Arrangement of regulations.

401.105-3 Copies.

401.106 OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act.

401.170 Electronic access to regulatory information.

Subpart 401.2 - Administration

401.201 Maintenance of the FAR.

401.201-1 The two councils.

Subpart 401.3 - Agency Acquisition Regulations

401.301 Policy.

401.304 Agency control and compliance procedures.

401.370 Exclusions.

401.371 AGAR Advisories.

401.372 Departmental directives.

Subpart 401.4 - Deviations From the FAR and AGAR

401.402 Policy.

401.403 Individual deviations.

401.404 Class deviations.

Subpart 401.6 - Contracting Authority and Responsibilities

401.601 General.

401.602 Contracting officers.

401.602-3 Ratification of unauthorized commitments.

401.603 Selection, appointment, and termination of appointment.

401.603-1 General.

PART 402 - DEFINITIONS OF WORDS AND TERMS

402.000 Scope of part.

Subpart 402.1 - Definitions

402.101 Definitions.

PART 403 - IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Subpart 403.1 - Safeguards

403.101 Standards of conduct.

403.101-3 Agency regulations.
403.104 Procurement integrity.

403.104-5 [Reserved]

403.104-7 Violations or possible violations.

Subpart 403.2 - Contractor Gratuities to Government Personnel

403.203 Reporting suspected violations of the gratuities clause.

403.204 Treatment of violations.

Subpart 403.3 - Reports of Suspected Antitrust Violations

403.303 Reporting suspected antitrust violations.

Subpart 403.4 - Contingent Fees

403.405 Misrepresentations or violations of the Covenant Against Contingent Fees.

Subpart 403.5 - Other Improper Business Practices

403.502 Subcontractor kickbacks.

Subpart 403.6 - Contracts With Government Employees or Organizations Owned or

Controlled by Them

403.602 Exceptions.

403.603 Responsibilities of the contracting officer.

Subpart 403.8 - Limitation on the Payment of Funds To Influence Federal Transactions

403.806 Processing suspected violations.

PART 404 - ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS

Subpart 404.2 - Contract Distribution

404.203 Taxpayer identification information.

Subpart 404.4 - Safeguarding Classified Information Within Industry

404.403 Responsibilities of contracting officers.

Subpart 404.6 - Contract Reporting

404.601 [Reserved]

404.602 Federal Procurement Data System.

Subpart 404.8 - Government Contract Files

404.870 Document numbering system.

Subpart 404.11 - Central Contractor Registration

404.1103 Procedures.

Subpart 404.70 - Precontract Notices

404.7001 Solicitation provision.
IV 

House Calendar No. 252 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1105 

[Report No. 109–727] 

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 102) making 

further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2007, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 8, 2006 

Mr. PUTNAM, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 

102) making further continuing appropriations for the 

fiscal year 2007, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order without intervention of any point of 

3 order to consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. 

4 Res. 102) making further continuing appropriations for 

5 the fiscal year 2007, and for other purposes. The joint 

6 resolution shall be considered as read. The previous ques7 tion shall be considered as ordered on the joint resolution 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1105 RH 

1 to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one 

2 hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair3 man and ranking minority member of the Committee on 

4 Appropriations; and (2) one motion to recommit. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS

rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 252 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1105 

[Report No. 109

–727] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution 

other purposes. propriations for the fiscal year 2007, and for (H.J. Res. 102) making further continuing apDECEMBER 8, 2006 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
226 So.2d 59

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Joseph DIMITRI.

No. 50044.

Sept. 5, 1969.

In re: State of Louisiana applying for writ of certiorari.

Writ refused. On the showing made, the result is correct.

BARHAM, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JUAN JR. CRISTO-MUNOZ,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 73 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 21st day of June, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 12 Filed 08/28/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 12 Filed 08/28/2006 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 12-2 Filed 08/28/2006 Page 1 of 1
323.7103 Solicitation Provision.       The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 352.223-71, Instruction to Offerors - Sustainable Acquisition, in solicitations above the micro-purchase threshold when the acquisition utilizes a product or service code designated by HHS as having sustainable acquisition attributes.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 323.71 - Sustainable Acquisition Requirements
SCWC-19-0000865 (Consolidated with SCWC-22-0000408)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ‘ I

SCWC-19-0000865

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, fka THE BANK OF NEW YORK, AS TRUSTEE (CWALT 2006-32CB), Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

DENNIS DUANE DeSHAW and SUSAN KAY BROER-DeSHAW, Petitioners/Defendants-Appellants.

and

MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, solely as nominee for FIRST MAGNUS FINANCIAL CORPORATION; and VILLAGE PARK COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, Defendants-Appellees.

SCWC-22-0000408

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, fka THE BANK OF NEW YORK, AS TRUSTEE (CWALT 2006-32CB), Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

DENNIS DUANE DeSHAW and SUSAN KAY BROER-DeSHAW, Petitioners/Defendants-Appellants. Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-19-0000865 26-JUN-2024 07:59 AM Dkt. 12 ODAC2 and

MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, solely as nominee for FIRST MAGNUS FINANCIAL CORPORATION; and VILLAGE PARK COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, Defendants-Appellees.

and

SUSAN KAY BROER-DeSHAW, Counterclaim Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, fka THE BANK OF NEW YORK, AS TRUSTEE (CWALT 2006-32CB), Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-19-0000865; CAAP-22-0000408; CASE NO. 1CC161001821)

ORDE R REJECTING APPLICATIONS FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ.)

Petitioners Dennis Duane DeShaw and Susan Kay BroerDeShaw’s Amended Application for Writ of Certiorari in SCWC-19-

0000865, filed on May 3, 2024, and Amended Application for Writ of

Certiorari in SCWC-22-0000408, filed on May 3, 2024, are hereby

rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai  i, June 26, 2024.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

/s/ Vladimir P. Devens
PART 729—TAXES

Authority: Sec. 621, Pub. L. 87–195, 75 Stat. 445, (22 U.S.C. 2381) as amended; E.O. 12163, Sept.

29, 1979, 44 FR 56673; and 3 CFR 1979 Comp., p. 435.

Source: 81 FR 48716, July 26, 2016, unless otherwise noted.

Subpart 729.4—Contract Clauses

729.402-70 Foreign contracts.

Parent topic: SUBCHAPTER E—GENERAL CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS

Subpart 729.4—Contract Clauses

729.402-70 Foreign contracts.

(a) The annual Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act

(SFOAA) requires USAID to take certain steps to prevent countries from imposing taxes, including

value added tax (VAT) and customs duties, on U.S. foreign assistance, or if imposed, requires the

countries to reimburse the assessed taxes or duties. The SFOAA also requires certain reporting to

Congress on host country taxation. Because countries imposing such taxes assess them directly on

contractors, USAID requires contractors to report annually on whether taxes have been imposed

and, if so, whether the foreign government reimbursed the taxes.

(b) The contracting officer must insert the clause at § 752.229–71, Reporting of Foreign Taxes, in

solicitations and resulting contracts when:

(1) A contract is fully or partially funded with funds appropriated under titles III through VI of an

SFOAA making appropriations for the Department of State, foreign operations, and related

programs, and

(2) The contract is to be performed wholly or partly in a foreign country.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Koontz, Bray and Senior Judge Hodges

ALONZO E. MURPHY

v. Record No. 2314-94-2 MEMORANDUM OPINION * PER CURIAM FRANK IX & SONS, INC. MAY 23, 1995 AND LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Edmund R. Michie; Michie, Hamlett, Lowry, Rasmussen & Tweel, on briefs), for appellant. (R. Ferrell Newman; Glenn S. Phelps; Thompson, Smithers, Newman & Wade, on brief), for appellees.

Alonzo E. Murphy contends that the Workers' Compensation Commission erred in finding that (1) it could not award permanent partial disability benefits because Murphy was entitled to and was receiving temporary total disability benefits under an open award; and (2) Murphy failed to establish entitlement to permanent partial disability benefits because he failed to prove that he had reached maximum medical improvement. Upon reviewing the record and the briefs of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the

commission's decision. Rule 5A:27. Code § 65.2-503(F)(1) provides that "[c]ompensation awarded pursuant to this section shall be in addition to all other

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.2 compensation and shall be payable after payments for temporary total incapacity pursuant to § 65.2-500." (Emphasis added.) The commission denied Murphy an award of permanent partial disability benefits, finding that his case for permanency was premature because he was still receiving temporary total disability benefits under an open award. Based upon the language of Code § 65.2-503(F)(1), we cannot say as a matter of law that the commission erred in finding that Murphy's claim for permanent partial disability was premature. Moreover, pursuant to Code § 65.2-708(A), Murphy has "thirty-six months from the last day for which compensation was paid" for filing a claim payable under

§ 65.2-503. Because our holding disposes of this appeal, we will not address the second question presented by Murphy. For the reasons stated, we affirm the commission's decision.

Affirmed.
Subpart 909.1 - Responsible Prospective

Contractors

Parent topic: PART 909 - CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS

909.104 Standards.

909.104-1 General standards.

(h) For solicitations for contract work subject to the provisions of 10 CFR part 707, Workplace

Substance Abuse Programs at DOE sites, the prospective contractor must agree, in accordancewith

970.5223-3., Agreement Regarding Workplace Substance Abuse Programs at DOE Sites, to provide

the contracting officer with its written workplace substance abuse program in order to be

determined responsible and, thus, eligible to receive the contract award.

909.104-3 Application of standards.

(e) Guaranteeing corporate entities. The Department of Energy (DOE) may select an entity which

was newly created to perform the prospective contract, including, but not limited to, a joint venture

or other similarly binding corporate partnership. In such instances when making the determination

of responsibility pursuant to 48 CFR 9.103, the contracting officer may evaluate the financial

resources of other entities only to the extent that those entities are legally bound, jointly and

severally if more than one, by means of a performance guarantee or other equivalent enforceable

commitment to supply the necessary resources to the prospective contractor and to assume all

contractual obligations of the prospective contractor. The guaranteeing corporate entity(ies) must

be found to have sufficient resources in order to satisfy its guarantee.