alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       3,159,959
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  470,753
<ALLOWANCES>                                    73,193
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      89,219,977
<DEPRECIATION>                              57,948,176
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              36,815,017
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,764,027
<BONDS>                                     21,135,652
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,915,338
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                36,815,017
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,985,317
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,831,408
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               368,087
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             819,814
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,966,008
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,966,008
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    18.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    18.71
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

Donna Dorsey Davis, ) 

as an individual and derivatively upon behalf ) 

of I-65 Properties, Inc. ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

vs., ) CIVIL ACTION NO: 

2:06cv766 

 ) 

Richard M. Dorsey, as an individual, ) 

and CD& O, LLC, as a necessary party, ) 

 ) 

 Defendant. ) 

Plaintiff’s Witness List 

 COMES NOW the Plaintiff, by and through the undersigned counsel, pursuant to 

this Honorable Court’s Scheduling Order and submits the following witnesses who may 

be used at the trial of this case: 

1. Richard M. Dorsey, 625 East Main Street, Prattville, Alabama 36068; 

2. Donna Dorsey Davis, 202 Wescott Drive, Clemson, South Carolina 

29631; 

3. Alan Taunton, P.O. Box 780248, Tallassee, Alabama 36078; 

4. Jack Davis, 202 Wescott Drive, Clemson, South Carolina 29631; 

5. Any person identified on any other parties’ witness list; 

6. Any person necessary to impeach the testimony of any witness called in 

this action; 

Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 17 Filed 03/01/2007 Page 1 of 2
7. Any person whose identity is not currently known but is learned through 

discovery; 

8. Discovery is ongoing in this matter. Plaintiff reserves the right to amend 

this witness list at any time to add witnesses who may be brought to light 

through continued discovery or to add the name(s) of any witness(es) 

whose name(s) may have been accidentally omitted from this list. 

By: _s/Lindsay B. Erwin_______ 

 Lindsay B. Erwin (ERW005) 

Lindsay B. Erwin 

Attorney at Law 

5704 Veterans Parkway 

Columbus, Georgia 31904 

(705) 576-4064 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that on this 13th day of October, 2006, I electronically filed the 

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system and have served a copy 

of same electronically and placing a copy of same in the Unites States Mail, postage 

prepaid and properly addressed to: 

Clifford W. Cleveland James E. Roberts 

Post Office Box 680689 4908 Cahaba River Road 

Prattville, Alabama 36068 Birmingham, Alabama 35243 

 s/ Lindsay B. Erwin__________

 Of Counsel 

Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 17 Filed 03/01/2007 Page 2 of 2
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-30796

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GEORGE DALE MCCOMBS,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 96-CR-20026

- - - - - - - - - -

February 21, 1997

Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for George Dale McCombs has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

and we have independently reviewed counsel's brief, the points

raised by McCombs in response to that brief, and the record, and

found no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused

from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. McCombs’ motion for the

appointment of additional appellate counsel is DENIED.
Case 2:06-cv-00745-WKW-CSC Document 2 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 1 of 1
M A N D A T E

TO THE 299TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, GREETINGS: 

Before our Court of Appeals for the Eighth District of Texas, on June 11, 2021, the cause upon 

appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

ALEXANDER HOLLAND, Appellant,

No. 08-19-00249-CR and

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee,

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no reversible 

error in the judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be 

certified below for observance. 

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of 

Appeals for the Eighth District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things have it duly recognized, 

obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Clerk of the Court of Appeals, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of 

El Paso, this October 29, 2021.

Elizabeth G. Flores, Clerk

Trial Court No. D-1-DC-19-904012

FILE COPY
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theaccompanying Quarterly Report of Greene County Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the “Report”),I, James E. Adams, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and AssistantSecretary of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)                                  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(1)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                                                                                  /s/    James E. Adams                                                                    JamesE. Adams                                                           SeniorVice President, Chief Financial                                                           Officerand Assistant Secretary

Date:  May 9, 2006

 

----
SUBCHAPTER H—CLAUSES AND FORMS

PART 1652—CONTRACT CLAUSES

PART 1653—FORMS

PART 1699—COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

PART 1652—CONTRACT CLAUSES

1652.000 Applicable clauses.

Subpart 1652.2—Texts of FEHBP Clauses

1652.203-70 Misleading, deceptive, or unfair advertising.

1652.204-70 Contractor records retention.

1652.204-71 Coordination of Benefits.

1652.204-72 Filing health benefit claims/court review of disputed claims.

1652.204-73 Taxpayer Identification Number.

1652.204-74 Large provider agreements.

1652.215-70 Rate Reduction for Defective Pricing or Defective Cost or Pricing

Data.

1652.215-71 Investment Income.

1652.216-70 Accounting and price adjustment.

1652.216-71 Accounting and Allowable Cost.

1652.222-70 Notice of significant events.

1652.224-70 Confidentiality of records.

1652.229-70 Taxes—Foreign Negotiated benefits contracts.

1652.232-70 Payments—community-rated contracts.

1652.232-71 Payments—experience-rated contracts.

1652.232-72 Non-commingling of FEHBP funds.

1652.232-73 Approval for the Assignment of Claims.

1652.243-70 Changes—Negotiated benefits contracts.

1652.244-70 Subcontracts.

1652.245-70 Government property (negotiated benefits contracts).

1652.246-70 FEHB Inspection.

1652.249-70 Renewal and withdrawal of approval.

1652.249-71 FEHBP termination for convenience of the government—negotiated

benefits contracts.

1652.249-72 FEHBP termination for default—negotiated benefits contracts.

Subpart 1652.3—FEHBP Clause Matrix

1652.370 Use of the matrix.

PART 1653—FORMS

1653.000 FEHBP forms.

PART 1699—COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

Subpart 1699.7—Cost Accounting Standards

1699.70 Cost accounting standards.
2837.503 Agency-head responsibilities.       The HCA or designee or designee is the agency head for purposes of FAR 37.503.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2837.5 - Management Oversight of Service Contracts
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

 ______________________________

HOWARD GLENN TOOLE, *

#C 917683

Petitioner, *

 v. * 1:06-CV-696-MHT

 

JAMES MCDONOUGH, et al., * 

Respondents. *

 ______________________________

ORDER ON MOTION

Upon consideration of Respondents’ Motion for Extension of Time, and for good

cause, it is ORDERED that:

1. Respondents’ motion (Doc. No. 28) is GRANTED; and

2. Respondents are GRANTED an extension from December 27, 2006 to January 10,

2007 to file their supplemental answer as directed by order filed December 7, 2006.

Done, this 5th day of January 2007.

 /s/Wallace Capel, Jr. 

WALLACE CAPEL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 29 Filed 01/05/2007 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.2


              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly annual report on Form 10-QSB (the "Form
10-QSB") for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, of Universal Detection
Technology (f/k/a/ Pollution Research and Control Corp.) (the "Issuer").

I, Michael Collins, the Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer certify that to
the best of my knowledge:

(i)  the Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
     section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or
     78o(d)); and

(ii) the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Issuer.

Dated: November 18, 2003.



                                   /s/ MICHAEL COLLINS
                                   ----------------------------
                                   NAME: MICHAEL COLLINS


                                       27
§ 1708.103 Request to conduct safety investigations. ( a ) Any person may request that the Board perform a preliminary safety inquiry or conduct a formal safety investigation concerning a matter within the Board's jurisdiction.
( b ) Actions the Board may take regarding safety investigation requests are discretionary.
( c ) The Board will offer to protect the identity of a person requesting a safety investigation to the maximum extent permitted by law.
( d ) Board safety investigations are wholly administrative and investigatory in nature and do not involve a determination of criminal culpability, adjudication of rights and duties, or other quasi-judicial determinations.
Subpart 1837.1—Service Contracts—General    **Parent topic:** PART 1837—SERVICE CONTRACTING1837.101 Definitions.       *Pension portability* means the recognition and continuation in a successor service contract of the predecessor service contract employees' pension rights and benefits.1837.104 Personal services contracts. (NASA supplements paragraph (b))       (b) Section 203(c)(9) of the National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958 (42 U.S.C. 2473(c)(9)) authorizes NASA “to obtain services as authorized by Section 3109 of Title 5, United States Code.” It is NASA policy to obtain the personal services of experts and consultants by appointment rather than by contract. The policies, responsibilities, and procedures pertaining to the appointment of experts and consultants are in NPR 3300.1, Appointment of Personnel To/From NASA, Chapter 4, Employment of Experts and Consultants.1837.110 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.1837.110-70 NASA solicitation provision and contract clauses.       (a) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 1852.237–70, Emergency Evacuation Procedures, in solicitations and contracts for on-site support services where emergency evacuations of the NASA installation may occur, e.g., snow, hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, or other emergencies.          (b) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 1852.237–71, Pension Portability, in solicitations, contracts or negotiated contract modifications for additional work when the procurement officer makes the determination in 1837.170(a)(2).1837.170 Pension portability.       (a) It is NASA's policy not to require pension portability in service contracts. However, pension portability requirements may be included in solicitations, contracts, or contract modifications for additional work under the following conditions:          (1)          (i)  			There is a continuing need for the same or similar services for a minimum of five years (inclusive of options), and, if the contractor changes, a high percentage of the predecessor contractor's employees are expected to remain with the program; or          (ii) The employees under a predecessor contract were covered by a portable pension plan, a follow-on contract or a contract consolidating existing services is awarded, and the total contract period covered by the plan covers a minimum of five years (including both the predecessor and successor contracts); and          (2) The procurement officer determines in writing, with full supporting rationale, that such a requirement is in the Government's best interest. The procurement officer shall maintain a record of all such determinations.          (b) When pension portability is required, the plan shall comply with the requirements of the clause at 1852.237–71, Pension Portability, (see 1837.110–70(b)), and the contract shall also include a clear description of the plan, including service, pay, liabilities, vesting, termination, and benefits from prior contracts.
Subpart 2406.2 - Full and Open Competition

After Exclusion of Sources

Parent topic: PART 2406 - COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS

2406.202 Establishing or maintaining alternative sources.

(b)

(1) The HCA shall sign the Determination and Finding (D&F) required by FAR 6.202(b)(1).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

vs. ) CR. NO. 1:06cr201-WHA

OSCAR MARTINEZ-RAMIREZ )

ORDER

Due to a conflict which has arisen in the court’s schedule, the sentencing of this

Defendant, presently scheduled for May 31, 2007, at 10:00 a.m. is RESCHEDULED for May 31,

2007, at 9:30 a.m. in District Courtroom 2-C, Frank M. Johnson, Jr. United States Courthouse

Complex, One Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama.

DONE this 29th day of May, 2007.

/s/ W. Harold Albritton 

W. HAROLD ALBRITTON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cr-00201-WHA-CSC Document 55 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 10.6



 Exhibit 10.6 
 Translation of Lease Agreement 
 Party A: Beijing De-haier Technology
Co. Ltd. (hereinafter referred as “Party A”) 
 Party B: Beijing Dehaier Medical Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred as
“Party B”) 
 On September 23, 2008, Party A and Party B have achieved mutual agreements on the following items: 
 Party A agrees to lease its land and buildings at 45 Yong An Road, Science Park, Changping District Beijing (102200) to Party B for free. The lease
period is from September 24th, 2008 to September 24th, 2010. Part B will be responsible for and pay all the fees of water, power, etc. 
 Party A agrees to renew the above agreement with Party B for another 2 years to September 24, 2012 on expiration of this lease on terms mutually acceptable to the parties.
Exhibit No. 32.2   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with this report of Questar Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Kevin W. Hadlock, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  QUESTAR CORPORATION   May 6, 2011 /s/Kevin W. Hadlock Kevin W. Hadlock Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

WILLIE MCNAIR, )

)

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2:06-cv-695-WKW

)

RICHARD ALLEN, et al., )

)

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. )

____________________________________

)

JAMES CALLAHAN, )

)

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2:06-cv-919-WKW

)

RICHARD ALLEN, et al., )

)

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that this matter is set for a telephone status conference at 3:00 p.m. (CDT)

on May 14, 2007, to be arranged by counsel for the plaintiffs. One counsel for each party shall be

in attendance. 

Done this 11th day of May, 2007.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 58 Filed 05/11/2007 Page 1 of 1
# Subpart 2427.3 - Patent Rights Under Government Contracts

**Parent topic:**PART 2427 - PATENTS, DATA, AND COPYRIGHTS

## 2427.305 Administration of patent rights clauses.

## 2427.305-2 Administration by the Government.

(b) Contractor reports. Contractors shall complete and submit to the Contracting Officer HUD Form 770, Report of Inventions and Subcontracts, upon receipt of said form. The Contracting Officer shall send the form to those contractors whose contract work may have required the development of inventions upon physical completion of the contract.
2122.170 Contract clauses.       The provisions at FAR sections 52.222-21, 52.222-22, 52-222.25 are implemented by changing the word “offeror” to “Contractor” and the word “solicitation” to “contract” wherever they appear in the text to reflect the FEGLI Program's statutory exemption from competitive bidding (5 U.S.C. 8709), which obviates the issuance of solicitations.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2122.1 - Basic Labor Policies
#### § 205.327 Other information.

The applicant may be required after filing the application to furnish such supplemental information as the ERA may deem pertinent. Such requests shall be written and a prompt response will be expected. Protest regarding the supplying of such information should be directed to the Administrator of the ERA.
Part 5246 - QUALITY ASSURANCE

Subpart 5246.7 - WARRANTIES

5246.703 Criteria for use of warranties.

5246.704 Authority for use of warranties.

5246.706 Warranty terms and conditions.

Subpart 5246.7 - WARRANTIES

5246.703 Criteria for use of warranties.

Notwithstanding FAR 46.703 and in accordance with 10 U.S.C. 8688, contracts for new construction

shipbuilding, for which funds are expended from the Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy account,

shall require, as a condition of the contract, that the work performed under the contract is covered

by a warranty for a period of at least one year.

(S-90) Waiver. If the contracting officer for a contract covered by the requirement for a new

shipbuilding contract warranty determines that a limited liability of warranted work is in the best

interest of the Government, the contracting officer may agree to limit the liability of the work

performed under the contract to a level that the contracting officer determines is sufficient to

protect the interests of the Government and is in keeping with historical levels of warranted work on

similar vessels.

5246.704 Authority for use of warranties.

(S-90) Notwithstanding DFARS 246.704 (1) and (2) and in accordance with 10 U.S.C. 8688, chief of

the contracting office approval is not required for the use of a warranty for new construction

shipbuilding for which funds are expended from the Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy account and

the contract is effective on or after the date of enactment of the National Defense Authorization for

FY2018.

5246.706 Warranty terms and conditions.

(b)(2) Remedies.

(iv) Acceptable turnaround time(s) for warranty corrective actions taken by the contractor should be

specified, and consideration should be given to using liquidated damages or charging the contractor

for product replacement costs when specified turnaround times are not met.

(5) Markings. Warranted items should be marked with the National Stock Number (NSN) or
manufacturer's part number, a serial number or other item identifier (if the warranty applies to

uniquely identified items), the contract number, an indication that a warranty applies, the

manufacturer or entity (if other than the contractor) providing the warranty, the date or time the

warranty expires, and an indication of whether or not attempted on-site repair by DON personnel

will void the warranty.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Janos Farkas, * From the 26th District

 Court of Williamson County,

 Trial Court No. 11-070-C26.

Vs. No. 11-12-00024-CV * January 9, 2014

Mortgage Electronic Registration * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, C.J.

Systems, Inc. et al., (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the 

judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed. The costs incurred by reason of this 

appeal are taxed against Janos Farkas.
z*> rwg cdU^TM fajbf/jfo/-APA&/js

Pj*/)£Xj3£tt1/>/tf/J S'/yi/TZT j, COA a/& ; Ab ~A$15- /£

2a/'Jtibjl/c/jl' /MAAcM' 30j 10/5 j S/z6f?dd£%k &AD-S&

fJeJ -A0 rtz faA/-££?mjaJ-J V/)djjL&j&*M £e/jl/'0j JMegte/* |N /UlJjte £o4£t0t Q/tin4SA/A/ Mfij&/j>0^/£>4/&. 4^ ' ^ N

MoTifijJ JjjJjtiOAf Mm/ted'£xJza/s/0A> £m0m*?-+ *„,~ jtfti/itijMfaJZjfe' 22, 4.0/IT. .MAY 222015

A A / Aj?8' Acosta> Clerk

A) a QcP)t /Mac/i/aJ&j 0/1 /am&Uz/s Ha fa/rfj/VA> Jssts>JJ/m

]Wr/A D&J*/M//V9 ^fft/eP,

MA+$Jtf/h/^-ftA£&AA£ jP/rf&lS Ja/c/ /Mo7J0Ak /OA t/A£

£auJdrtf-iS /s$ja £/* OdjQ/J ^0 jud C.Qj)/£3s

LdA&jJh/u;* j0gfrf?0Ai£/i -Pju&-rtdji/j D0jj*{GmJ ^M^ MfojJ Md JiJsJ/Za/c/ A,/£ 9f$ IA) jtaJ j0/£fc/r0At£r/2X

oounraFijSgL RECEIVED IN

M^yfi """S €OUWTCFCfllMlWAt_ APPEALS

MAY a 0 2015

toita,Ctoik