alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Miocene cooling in the southwestern Powder River basin, Wyoming: Preliminary evidence from apatite fission-track analysis

By: Nancy D. Naeser

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1917O

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
-                                 Larger Work: This publication is Chapter                                O of                                                                              Evolution of sedimentary basins: Powder River Basin                                                                    
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### CURRO, Respondent, v. NEW YORK, O. & W. R. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

May 29, 1914.)

Action by Onofrio Curro against the New York, Ontario & Western Railroad Company.

No opinion. Motion for leave to appeal to Court of Appeals denied, with $10 costs. For former decisions, see 147 N. Y. Supp. 1105, 1106.
# Subpart 2828.1 - Bonds and Other Financial Protections

**Parent topic:**PART 2828 - BONDS AND INSURANCE

## 2828.101 Bid guarantees.

## 2828.101-1 Policy on use.

The HCA or designee is the agency head for the purposes of authorizing class waivers in accordance with FAR 28.101-1(c).     

## 2828.106 Administration.

## 2828.106-6 Furnishing information.

In accordance with FAR 28.106-6(c), the HCA, or designee at a level at or above the BPC, is the agency official authorized to furnish the certified copy of the bond and the contract.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 29, 2023

NO. 03-23-00227-CV

Monica Ramirez Leyva, Appellant

v.

Aguado Stone, Inc., Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 368TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES KELLY AND THEOFANIS

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on March 16, 2023. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. The 

appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
§ 1041.170 Compliance procedures. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, this section applies to all allegations of discrimination on the basis of handicap in programs or activities conducted by the agency.
( b ) The agency shall process complaints alleging violations of section 504 with respect to employment according to the procedures established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 29 CFR part 1613 pursuant to section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791).
( c ) The Manager of Federally Assisted Programs shall be responsible for coordinating implementing of this section. Complaints may be sent to Director of Equal Opportunity, U.S. Department of Energy, Room 4B-112, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585, (202) 586-2218.
( d ) The agency shall accept and investigate all complete complaints for which it has jurisdiction. All complete complaints must be filed within 180 days of the alleged act of discrimination. The agency may extend this time period for good cause.
( e ) If the agency receives a complaint over which it does not have jurisdiction, it shall promptly notify the complainant and shall make reasonable efforts to refer the complaint to the appropriate government entity.
( f ) The agency shall notify the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board upon receipt of any complaint alleging that a building or facility that is subject to the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4151-4157), or section 502 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. 792), is not readily accessible to and usable by handicapped persons.
( g ) Within 180 days of the receipt of a complete complaint for which it has jurisdiction, the agency shall notify the complainant of the results of the investigation in a letter containing— ( 1 ) Findings of fact and conclusions of law;
( 2 ) A description of a remedy for each violation found;
( 3 ) A notice of the right to appeal.
( h ) Appeals of the findings of fact and conclusions of law or remedies must be filed by the complainant within 90 days of receipt from the agency of the letter required by § 1041.170(g). The agency may extend this time for good cause.
( i ) Timely appeals shall be accepted and processed by the head of the agency.
( j ) The head of the agency shall notify the complainant of the results of the appeal within 60 days of the receipt of the request. If the head of the agency determines that additional information is needed from the complainant, he or she shall have 60 days from the date of receipt of the additional information to make his or her determination on the appeal.
( k ) The time limits cited in paragraphs (g) and (j) of this section may be extended with the permission of the Assistant Attorney General.
( l ) The agency may delegate its authority for conducting complaint investigations to other Federal agencies, except that the authority for making the final determination may not be delegated to another agency.
[51 FR 4574, Feb. 5, 1986. Redesignated and amended at 52 FR 1902, Jan. 16, 1987]
Subpart 3012.3—Solicitation Provisions and

Contract Clauses for the Acquisition of

Commercial Items

Parent topic: PART 3012—ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL ITEMS

3012.301 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses for the

acquisition of commercial items.

(f) Solicitation provisions and contract clauses. Insert (HSAR) 48 CFR 3052.212–70, Contract Terms

and Conditions Applicable to DHS Acquisition of Commercial Items, in any solicitation or contract

for commercial items when any of the provisions or clauses listed therein applies and where

incorporation by reference of each selected provision or clause is, to the maximum extent

practicable, consistent with customary commercial practice. If necessary, tailor this clause.
Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 88 Filed 01/17/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cv-00701-ID-CSC Document 2 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00701-ID-CSC Document 2 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00701-ID-CSC Document 2 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00701-ID-CSC Document 2 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 4 of 4
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*January 18, 2008*

[Cite as *01/1812008 Case Announcements,*2008-Ohio-144.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2007-0307.

#### Dworning v. Euclid.

Cuyahoga App. No. 87757, 2006-Ohio-6772. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County. Upon consideration of the joint motion of appellee and amicus curiae The Ohio Employment Lawyers Association to allow amicus to participate in oral argument on January 22, 2008,

It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted, and amicus curiae is permitted to argue the entire fifteen minutes allotted to appellee.
Subpart 1524.1 - Protection of Individual

Privacy

Parent topic: PART 1524 - PROTECTION OF PRIVACY AND FREEDOM OF INFORMATION

1524.104 Solicitation provisions.

The Contracting Officer shall insert the provision at 1552.224-70, Social Security Numbers of

Consultants and Certain Sole Proprietors and Privacy Act Statement, in all solicitations.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Herbert B. Grimes, certify that:

|   
|---
|(1)
|   
|(2)
|   
|(3)
|   
|(4)

|  
|--
|a.
|  
|b.
|  
|c.
|  
|d.

|   
|---
|(5)

|  
|--
|a.
|  
|b.

|                     |  |                                                                                                                                 
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 19, 2010 |  | /s/ Herbert B. GrimesHerbert B. GrimesChairman of the Board of Directors andChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)



---
exv4w8






EXHIBIT 4.8




[FORM OF BENEFICIAL OWNER ELECTION FORM]




FORM OF BENEFICIAL OWNER ELECTION



     The undersigned acknowledge(s) receipt of your letter and the enclosed materials referred to
therein relating to the offering (the “Rights Offering”) to purchase Units (the “Units”) consisting
of one share of common stock and a three-year warrant to purchase 0.5 shares of common stock at an
exercise price of $4.00 per share by stockholders of record (“Record Date Stockholders”) as of 5:00
p.m., New York City time, on [     ], 2010 (the “Record Date”).



     With respect to any instructions to exercise (or not to exercise) the Rights, the undersigned
acknowledges that this form must be completed and returned such that it will actually be received
by you by 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on [     ], 2010, the last business day prior to the
scheduled expiration date of the Rights Offering of [     ], 2010 (which may be extended by
the Company in its sole discretion).



     This will instruct you whether to exercise Rights to purchase Units distributed with respect
to the shares of the Company’s common stock, $0.0001 par value, held by you for the account of the
undersigned, pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Prospectus and
the related Subscription Rights Certificates.



     Box 1.  ̈ • Please DO NOT EXERCISE RIGHTS for Units.



     Box 2.  ̈ • Please EXERCISE RIGHTS for Units as set forth below.



     The number of Rights for which the undersigned gives instructions for exercise under the Basic
Subscription Rights should not exceed the number of Rights that the undersigned is entitled to
exercise.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	Per Unit	 	 
	 	 	Number of Units	 	Subscription Price	 	Payment
	 
	Basic Subscription Right
	 	 	[          ]	X	 	$	[          ]	= 	 	$	                    	(Line 1) 
	Over-Subscription Right
	 	 	[          ]	X	 	$	[          ]	= 	 	$	                    	(Line 2) 
	Total Payment Required
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	$	                    	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	(Sum of Lines 1 and 2 must equal total of amounts in Boxes 3 and 4)






     Box 3. o • Payment in the following amount is enclosed $          .



     Box 4. o • Please deduct payment from the following account maintained by you as
follows:



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	Type of Account:	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	Account No.:	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	Amount to be deducted:          $	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	Signature:	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	Name:	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	Title:	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	Date:               , 2010
IV 

House Calendar No. 246 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1093 

[Report No. 109–719] 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 

consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 5, 2006 

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered 

to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with 

respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported 

from the Committee on Rules. 

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule 

2 XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the 

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to 

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported on the legislative day of December 6, 2006, pro6 viding for consideration of a bill to amend the Internal 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

HRES 1093 RH 

1 Revenue Code of 1986 to extend expiring provisions, and 

2 for other purposes. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS

ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 246 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1093 

[Report No. 109

–719] 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII 

tions reported from the Committee on Rules. with respect to consideration of certain resoluDECEMBER 5, 2006 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
160 So.2d 595

#### McKENZIE & MOUK, INC. v. OUACHITA NATIONAL BANK IN MONROE et al.

No. 47124.

Feb. 24, 1964.

In re: McKenzie & Mouk, Inc. applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Ouachita. 159 So.2d 304.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal we find no error of law in its judgment.
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 15 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 1 of 1
Amendment No. 2 to 2006 Variable Compensation Plan dated December 2, 2009



 EXHIBIT 10.58 
 CORNING INCORPORATED 
 2006 VARIABLE COMPENSATION
PLAN 
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 
 Pursuant to Section 9 of the Plan, the Board of Directors hereby amends the Corning Incorporated 2006 Variable Compensation Plan (the “Plan”), effective as of January 1, 2006, as
follows: 
  

	 	1.	The words “Variable Compensation Plan” are deleted each place they appear in the Plan and are replaced with the words “ 

 Variable Compensation Plan, also known as the Performance Incentive Plan.” 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused its duly authorized officer to execute this Amendment No. 2 on its behalf this 2nd day of
December, 2009. 
  

			
	CORNING INCORPORATED
		
	By:	 	 /s/ John P. MacMahon

		 	John P. MacMahon
		 	 Senior Vice President, Global
 Compensation and Benefits
#### § 959.6 Handler.

*Handler* is synonymous with *shipper* and means any person (except a common or contract carrier of onions owned by another person) who handles onions or causes onions to be handled.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<MULTIPLIER>      1
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             3-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              Mar-31-1998
<CASH>                                        163,132
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       4
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              175,994
<PP&E>                                     10,027,644
<DEPRECIATION>                              2,772,057
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              7,436,501
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         111,730
<BONDS>                                             0
<COMMON>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                  7,324,772
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                7,436,502
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              358,970
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 283,614
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                75,356
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            75,356
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   75,356
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    6.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    6.75
<FN>
The  earnings  per share data  noted  above  refers to net  income  per  limited
partnership unit.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

CAMELLIA THERAPEUTIC )

FOSTER AGENCY, LLC, etc., )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv735-MHT

) 

THE ALABAMA DEPARTMENT )

OF HUMAN RESOURCES, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion to dismiss and

alternative motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 35) are

set for submission, without oral argument, on June 20,

2007, with any opposing brief and evidentiary materials

due by said date.

DONE, this the 1st day of June, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00735-MHT-CSC Document 39 Filed 06/01/2007 Page 1 of 1
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

 NORTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

) 

V. ) Case No.2:06-mj-79-SRW 

) 

SANTO COLEMAN )

MOTION TO TRANSCRIBE RECORDING OF DETENTION HEARING

Now comes the defendant, by and through the undersigned and hereby moves this 

honorable court to transcribe the recording of the defendant’s detention hearing, and 

allow the defendant to access such transcription upon completion. The defendant also 

requests for an expeditious transcription as time is of the essence. 

Respectfully Submitted, 

/s/ Joe M. Reed

Joe M. Reed 

Attorney for Defendant 

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that the foregoing was filed with the Clerk of the Court and that notice 

will be sent by the Clerk to the Honorable Terry Moorer, Assistant United States 

Attorney, P.O. Box 197, Montgomery, AL 36101 by electronic mail this 19th day of 

September, 2006. 

__/s/ Joe M. Reed______ 

Joe M. Reed 

Case 2:06-mj-00079-SRW Document 29 Filed 09/19/2006 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

JAMES KUCZMASKI, ADAM

PIKE, RYAN PHILLIPS, JOSH

STONE, SUHANE LOWERY,

KEVIN BELL, and HAMP CRUM,

III, individually and on behalf of

other persons similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

U.S. FOODSERVICE

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CIVIL ACTION NO.

CV-2:06-cv-731

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS

Please be advised that Tammy L. Baker has joined the firm of Jackson

Lewis LLP. Ms. Baker’s new contact information is below.

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Tammy L. Baker

Tammy L. Baker, ASB-9522-B62T

BakerT@jacksonlewis.com

Jackson Lewis LLP

2001 Park Place North

Suite 650

Birmingham, Alabama 35203

Phone – (866) 919-6075

Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 31 Filed 05/22/2007 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on May 22, 2007, the undersigned electronically

filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system

that will send notification of such filing to the following:

Gregory O. Wiggins, Esq.

Wiggins, Childs, Quinn & Pantazis, P.C.

The Kress Building

301 19th Street North

Birmingham, Alabama 35203

Tucker F. Burge, Esq.

Burge & Burge

850 Park Place Tower

2001 Park Place North

Birmingham, Alabama 35203

s/ Tammy L. Baker

Tammy L. Baker

Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 31 Filed 05/22/2007 Page 2 of 2
2402.000 Scope of part.

This part contains definitions of terms used generally throughout the HUDAR, in addition to those

set forth in FAR part 2. Additional definitions will be found in individual subparts of the FAR and

HUDAR covering terms used in those subparts only.

Parent topic: PART 2402 - DEFINITIONS OF WORDS AND TERMS
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

OWEN J. ROGAL, D.D.S., )

P.C., )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 3:06cv711-MHT

) 

SKILSTAF, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion for leave to reply

(Doc. No. 51) is granted.

DONE, this the 30th day of April, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 54 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 1 of 1
(May 28, 1970)

#### In the Matter of Elizabeth Holtzman et al., Appellants, v. James M. Power et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents, and Louis J. Lefkowitz, as Attorney-General, Intervenor-Respondent.

Order entered May 20,1970, dismissing the petition, unanimously reversed, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, without costs and without disbursements, and the proceeding remanded to Special Term, Part I, New York County, for the head of the calendar of June 4, 1970, for further proceedings in accordance herewith. The incumbent candidates for the positions sought by petitioners in the subject primary election, having significant interests in the outcome, are regarded as indispensable parties to the litigation and each is accordingly added as a party defendant. Notice thereof shall be served by petitioners on each such incumbent no later than May 29, 1970, by registered special delivery mail to the address set forth on each such incumbent’s petition filed at the Board of Elections, with return receipts to be filed at Special Term on June 4. The proceeding being, in substance, an action for declaratory judgment of unconstitutionality, is so regarded regardless of form, and the papers submitted and to be submitted by all parties shall serve as pleadings therein. Time being of the essence, the court shall dispose of the action by trial forthwith, to be completed with all possible speed, whether at Special Term or by a Special Referee of the court or, in the discretion of the administrative Judge, by transfer to a trial part. The petitioners are held to have standing to pursue the action inasmuch as, at the time of argument at Special Term, each had actually filed a petition at the Board of Elections, and that undisputed fact was made known to the court. The existing stay is continued in effect, subject to the further order of Special Term. In view of the disposition herein made, no adjudication is arrived at on any point of constitutionality. Concur — Eager, J. P., McGivern, Markewich and Steuer, JJ.