alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1707.102 Applicability. This part applies to demands and requests to employees for factual, opinion, or expert testimony relating to official information, or for production of official records or information, in legal proceedings in which the United States or the DNFSB is not a named party. However, it does not apply to: ( a ) Demands upon or requests for a DNFSB employee to testify as to facts or events that are unrelated to his or her official duties or that are unrelated to the functions of DNFSB;
( b ) Demands upon or requests for a former DNFSB employee to testify as to matters in which the former employee was not directly or materially involved while at the DNFSB;
( c ) Requests for the release of records under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, or the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a; and
( d ) Congressional demands and requests for testimony or records.
[66 FR 66715, Dec. 27, 2001, as amended at 87 FR 22437, Apr. 15, 2022]
2432.908 Contract clauses.       (c)          (1)  			The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 2452.232-73, Constructive Acceptance Period, in solicitations and contracts when the contracting officer has determined that an acceptance period longer than the 7 days provided for in the FAR clause at 52.232-25, “Prompt Payment,” is needed.          (2) The contracting officer shall insert a clause substantially the same as provided at 2452.232-70, Payment Schedule and Invoice Submission (Fixed-price), in fixed-price contracts other than performance-based contracts under which performance-based payments will be used.          (3) The contracting officer shall insert a clause substantially the same as provided at 2452.232-71, Voucher Submission, in all cost-reimbursement, time-and-materials, and labor-hour type solicitations and contracts. The contracting officer shall insert the billing period agreed upon with the contractor (see also the FAR clause at 52.216-7, “Allowable Cost and Payment”).          (4) The Contracting Officer may substitute appropriate language for the clauses in paragraph (c)(2) and (3) of this clause when payment under the contract will be made on the basis of other than the submission of an invoice or voucher; e.g., directly from proceeds of property sales.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2432.9 - Prompt Payment
#### § 14.13 When is a claim presented to NRC.

For purposes of the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 2672, a claim is presented when NRC receives from a claimant, or the claimant's duly authorized agent or legal representative, an executed Standard Form 95 or other written notification of an incident. An executed Standard Form 95 or written notification must be accompanied by a claim for money damages in a sum certain for damage to or loss of property, personal injury, or death alleged to have occurred by reason of the incident.
#### § 1709.101 Cross-reference to executive branch-wide debt collection regulations.

The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board adopts the regulations at 31 CFR parts 900 through 904 governing the administrative collection, offset, compromise, and the suspension or termination of collection activity for debts or civil claims for money, funds or property owed to the United States government as defined by 31 U.S.C. 3701(b).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

August 31, 2007

NOTICE OF CORRECTION

To: All Counsel of Record

From: Clerk’s Office

Case Style: Progressive American Insurance Company v. Carol Thorn, et al.

Case Number: #2:06-cv-00717-ID

Referenced Document: Document #75 

 Motion to Compel Plaintiff Progressive Insurance Company to

 Respond to Defendant Kirkindoll’s Discovery Requests

This notice has been docketed to enter the corrected pdf of the referenced document into the

record. The original pdf did not contain a proper electronic signature on the certificate of

service as required by the Civil Administrative Procedures II-C. The corrected pdfis attached

to this notice.

Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 77 Filed 08/31/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 77-2 Filed 08/31/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 77-2 Filed 08/31/2007 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,027
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,042
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (1,713)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,360
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,487
<PP&E>                                          14,841
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (11,007)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,586
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,939
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           110 
<OTHER-SE>                                      (3,827)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,586 
<SALES>                                         44,050 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                44,050 
<CGS>                                          (24,662)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  (24,662)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (22,212)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   (80)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (621)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3,525)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3,525)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,525)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.34)
        

</TABLE>
Case 2:06-cr-00198-WKW-CSC Document 61 Filed 09/04/2007 Page 1 of 1
# Subpart 2444.2 - Contract Clauses

**Parent topic:**PART 2444 - SUBCONTRACTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

## 2444.204 Contract clauses.

(a) Insert HUDAR clause 2452.244-70 Consent to Subcontract, in contracts and task orders with an estimated value exceeding $10,000,000.
Unassociated Document


    TERMINATION
AGREEMENT

    


    This
Termination Agreement (“Termination
Agreement”), dated as of February 9, 2010, by and between Noble Medical
Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Noble”) and GoldSail
Shipping Corporation, a Marshall Islands corporation (the “Company”) terminates
that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of May 5, 2009 (the “Merger Agreement”) by
and among Noble, the Company and Noble Merger Corp., a Delaware corporation and
a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Merger
Sub”).  Capitalized terms used herein and not defined shall
have the meanings ascribed to them in the Merger Agreement.

     

    WHEREAS,
Noble, the Company and Merger Sub have heretofore entered into the Merger
Agreement; and

     

    WHEREAS,
Noble and the Company desire to terminate the Merger Agreement pursuant to
Section 7.1(a) thereunder.

     

    NOW
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained in
this Termination Agreement and the benefit to all of the parties hereto, and for
other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are
hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

     

    1.  Noble and
the Company hereby agree that all of the terms and provisions of the Merger
Agreement are terminated and of no further force or effect as of the date first
set forth above.

     

    2.  This
Termination Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with,
the laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to the conflict of law
principles thereof.

     

    3.  This
Termination Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, and by the
different parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which when executed
shall be deemed to be an original but all of which taken together shall
constitute one and the same agreement.

     

    IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Termination Agreement to be
executed and delivered as of the date first written above.

     

    
      
        	 	NOBLE
      MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.	 
	 	 	 	 
	
                 

              	
                By:
      

              	/s/ George
      Elliott	 
	 	 	Name:
      George Elliott	 
	 	 	Title: Chief Executive
      Officer,	 
	 	 	President,
      Secretary	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	GOLDSAIL
      SHIIPPING CORPORATION	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	

                By:
      

              	/s/
      George Elliott	 
	 	 	Name:
      George Elliott	 
	 	 	Title:
      Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3503 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the financing of 

the Superfund. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 13, 2006 

Mrs. BOXER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

the financing of the Superfund. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Toxic Clean-up Pol5 luter Pays Renewal Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF SUPERFUND TAXES. 

7 (a) EXCISE TAXES.—Section 4611(e) of the Internal 

8 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows: 

9 ‘‘(e) APPLICATION OF HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE

10 SUPERFUND FINANCING RATE.—The Hazardous SubVerDate Aug 31 2005 01:55 Jun 14, 2006 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3503.IS S3503

bajohnson on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
2 

•S 3503 IS

1 stance Superfund financing rate under this section shall 

2 apply after December 31, 1986, and before January 1, 

3 1996, and after the date of the enactment of this sub4 section and before January 1, 2017.’’. 

5 (b) CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTAL INCOME TAX.— 

6 Section 59A(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 

7 amended to read as follows: 

8 ‘‘(e) APPLICATION OF TAX.—The tax imposed by this 

9 section shall apply to taxable years beginning after De10 cember 31, 1986, and before January 1, 1996, and to tax11 able years beginning after the date of the enactment of 

12 this subsection and before January 1, 2017.’’. 

13 (c) TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.— 

14 (1) Section 4611(b) of the Internal Revenue 

15 Code of 1986 is amended— 

16 (A) by striking ‘‘or exported from’’ in 

17 paragraph (1)(A), 

18 (B) by striking ‘‘or exportation’’ in para19 graph (1)(B), and 

20 (C) by striking ‘‘AND EXPORTATION’’ in 

21 the heading. 

22 (2) Section 4611(d)(3) of such Code is amend23 ed— 


bajohnson on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
3 

•S 3503 IS

1 (A) by striking ‘‘or exporting the crude oil, 

2 as the case may be’’ in the text and inserting 

3 ‘‘the crude oil’’, and 

4 (B) by striking ‘‘OR EXPORTS’’ in the 

5 heading. 

6 (d) EFFECTIVE DATES.— 

7 (1) EXCISE TAXES.—The amendments made by 

8 subsections (a) and (c) shall take effect on the date 

9 of the enactment of this Act. 

10 (2) INCOME TAX.—The amendment made by 

11 subsection (b) shall apply to taxable years beginning 

12 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
§ 160.5 Violations and penalties. ( a ) Whoever willfully violates either §§ 160.3 or 160.4 shall, upon conviction, be punishable by a fine of not more than $1,000.
( b ) Whoever willfully violates either §§ 160.3 or 160.4 with respect to any facility, installation or real property enclosed by a fence, wall, floor, roof, or other structural barrier shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be punished by a fine of not to exceed $5,000 or imprisonment for not more than one year, or both.
#### § 1016.16 Special handling of classified material.

When the Restricted Data contained in material is not ascertainable by observation or examination at the place where the material is located and when the material is not readily removable because of size, weight, radioactivity, or similar factors, DOE may authorize the permittee to provide such lesser protection than is otherwise required by §§ 1016.21 to 1016.23 inclusive, as DOE determines to be commensurate with the difficulty of removing the material.

[48 FR 36432, Aug. 10, 1983. Redesignated at 82 FR 41506, Sept. 1, 2017
#### City of Binghamton, Respondent, v. Arlington Hotel, Inc., Appellant.

Aulisi, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered October 25, 1968 in Broome County, which denied appellant’s motion to vacate or modify a notice of discovery and inspection dated June 5, 1968. Petitioner, hereinafter the city, appropriated property of respondent in connection with its Urban Renewal program. Upon referral to Commissioners of Appraisal, respondent moved for discovery and inspection of certain appraisals made on behalf of the City. This was granted and affirmed by this court *(City of Binghamton*v. *Arlington Hotel,*30 A D 2d 585), whereupon the city served notice pursuant to CPLR 3120 (subd. [a]) for the Hotel to produce and permit discovery of “All appraisals of the subject property, except the appraisal to be used on trial.” Respondent’s motion for a protective order (CPLR 3122) was denied and this appeal is taken from that ruling. Respondent’s principal objection to the city’s notice and the basis for the requested protective relief is that the notice fails to designate specifically the documents which the city seeks to examine. Required of every notice pursuant to CPLR 3120 is that the documents sought to 'be examined be specifically identified *(Rios*v. *Donovan,*21 A D 2d 409) and specified with reasonable particularity (see 3 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N. Y. Civ. Prac., par. 3120.17). The disputed notice is deficient in this regard, and as presently broadly phrased, would appear to encompass all appraisals in respondent’s possession even those prepared for litigation, material to which the City is not entitled, absent special circumstances (CPLR 3101, subd. [d]). That the notice make reference to specific documents is essential, for only then can a proper determination be *716made by the party served whether the items sought to be examined constitute, privileged material and an appropriate protective' order be applied for. Order reversed, on the law and ;the facts, with costs, and motion to vacate notice granted. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Cooke, JJ., concur in memorandum by Aulisi, J.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Craig E. Holmes, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Intervoice, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238and 34-47986]; c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: July 1, 2004   /s/ Craig E. Holmes   Craig E. Holmes Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 2:06cr193-MEF

 )

JOSHUA WAYNE HESTER )

UNITED STATES’ NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

Comes now the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney for the Middle District of

Alabama, Andrew O. Schiff, and enters his notice of appearance on behalf of the United States in

the above-styled cause.

Respectfully submitted this the 16th day of November, 2006.

LEURA G. CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/Andrew O. Schiff

ANDREW O. SCHIFF

Assistant United States Attorney

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334) 223-7280

Fax: (334) 223-7135

E-mail: andrew.schiff@usdoj.gov

 

Case 2:06-cr-00193-MEF-CSC Document 39 Filed 11/16/2006 Page 1 of 2
-2-

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 2:06cr193-MEF

 )

JOSHUA WAYNE HESTER )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on November 16, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk

of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following:

Stephen Glassroth, Esq.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/Andrew O. Schiff

ANDREW O. SCHIFF

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334)223-7280

Fax: (334)223-7135

E-mail: andrew.schiff@usdoj.gov

Case 2:06-cr-00193-MEF-CSC Document 39 Filed 11/16/2006 Page 2 of 2
§ 1707.207 Restrictions that apply to testimony. ( a ) The General Counsel may impose conditions or restrictions on the testimony of DNFSB employees including, for example, limiting the areas of testimony or requiring the requester and other parties to the legal proceeding to agree that the transcript of the testimony will be kept under seal or will only be used or made available in the particular legal proceeding for which testimony was requested. The General Counsel may also require a copy of the transcript of testimony at the requester's expense.
( b ) The DNFSB may offer the employee's written declaration in lieu of testimony.
( c ) If authorized to testify pursuant to this part, an employee may testify as to facts within his or her personal knowledge, but, unless specifically authorized to do so by the General Counsel, the employee shall not: ( 1 ) Disclose classified, privileged, or otherwise protected information;
( 2 ) Testify as an expert or opinion witness with regard to any matter arising out of the employee's official duties or the functions of DNFSB unless testimony is being given on behalf of the United States (see also 5 CFR 2635.805 for current employees).
#### § 13.36 Post-hearing briefs.

The ALJ may require the parties to file post-hearing briefs. In any event, any party may file a post-hearing brief. The ALJ shall fix the time for filing such briefs, not to exceed 60 days from the date the parties receive the transcript of the hearing or, if applicable, the stipulated record. Such briefs may be accompanied by proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. The ALJ may permit the parties to file reply briefs.
#### § 1013.11 Referral of complaint and answer to the ALJ.

Upon receipt of an answer, the reviewing official shall file the complaint and answer with the ALJ.
#### § 981.47 Method of establishing salable and reserve percentages.

Whenever the Secretary finds, from the recommendations and supporting information supplied by the Board or from any other available information, that to designate the percentages of almonds during any crop year which shall be salable almonds and reserve almonds would tend to effectuate the declared policy of the act, he shall designate such percentages. Except as provided in § 981.50 the salable and reserve percentages shall each be applied to the kernel weight of almonds received by a handler for his own account during the crop year. In establishing such salable and reserve percentages, the Secretary shall give consideration to the ratio of estimated trade demand (domestic plus export, less the handler carryover available to satisfy trade demand plus the desirable handler carryover at the end of the crop year) to the estimated production of marketable almonds (all expressed in terms of kernel weight) or the allocation quantity (marketable production plus almonds diverted to oil or feed when eligible for reserve satisfaction) whichever is applicable; the recommendation submitted to him by the Board; and such other information as he deems appropriate. The total of the salable and reserve percentages established each crop year shall equal 100 percent.

[41 FR 26853, June 30, 1976, as amended at 61 FR 32921, June 26, 1996]
2919.000 Scope of part.

This part implements FAR part 19 and small business programs at the Department of Labor.

Parent topic: PART 2919 - SMALL BUSINESS AND SMALL DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS

CONCERNS
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Herbert Langdon, Appellant, v. Vincent R. Mancusi, as Warden of Attica Prison, Respondent.

Appeal unanimously dismissed as academic. Memorandum: It appears that the issues presented herein have become moot by reason of the expiration of appellant’s maximum sentence and his discharge from custody. Moreover, appellant’s contentions are without merit in the light of *People ex rel. Petite*v. *Follette*(24 N Y 2d 60). (Appeal from judgment of Wyoming County Court, dismissing writ of habeas corpus.) Present - Goldman, P. J., Del Veechio, Marsh, Gabrielli and Bastow, JJ.