alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1003.5 Extension of time.

When a document is required to be filed within a prescribed time, an extension of time to file may be granted by the OHA upon good cause shown.
LINO |

3
Or ART
AARP UMN * Se

a
(ea

SRSA OSE he
AIS SUN CS

oat : x os NAO OF OS WS LA eS lo
eA Ne ON
CARR eS Aa Ae ia 4 SCE TSU AON
: STAT UBD aR ig oe N

REC AR AIS eR
NTA ESS leas daseiae

PEO ere CAN Ibe

RN Se

NON BB a

ns 8 :
Dao ‘" ‘ : aN 4 x ( Se \\
mF Me - ru |S | N i
tA : ~~) aN =o ne F OC p NI YF RE
PC Og SETAE | a tp ages
= a\ a : “ya 2 2 SOL Vie :
: ant PORE, aes owl SEAS eh :
aN es US: oe | . rae mS |
« mi <4 {> .
Subpart 1946.7 - Warranties

Parent topic: PART 1946 - QUALITY ASSURANCE

1946.704 Authority for use of warranties.

(a) The procurement request initiator is responsible for preparing a written recommendation for

those purchases deemed to be appropriate for application of warranty provisions. The

recommendation shall state why a warranty is appropriate by specifically addressing the criteria set

forth in FAR 46.703. The recommendation shall also identify the specific parts, subassemblies,

assemblies, systems, or contract line items to which a warranty should apply.

(b) Prior to solicitation of the requirement, the contracting officer shall make a written

determination when a warranty provision is to be included.
SUBCHAPTER H - CLAUSES AND FORMS

PART 1952 - SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES

PART 1953 - FORMS

PARTS 1954-1999 [RESERVED]

List of IAAR Forms

PART 1952 - SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES

1952.000 Scope of part.

Subpart 1952.1 - Instructions for Using Provisions and Clauses

1952.102-2 Incorporation in full text.

1952.104 Procedures for modifying and completing provisions and clauses.

Subpart 1952.2 - Texts of Provisions and Clauses

1952.215-70 Key personnel and facilities.

1952.227-76 Government rights (unlimited).

1952.227-77 Rights in shop drawings.

1952.227-78 Disposition of prints and videotape recordings.

PART 1953 - FORMS

Subpart 1953.3 - Illustrations of Forms

1953.300 Scope of subpart.

1953.370 The Broadcasting Board of Governors forms.

PARTS 1954-1999 [RESERVED]

List of IAAR Forms
#### Margaret Uvick et al., Respondents, v. Evans F. Sealand, Appellant.

—In a malpractice action, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated September 8, 1966, which (1) granted plaintiffs’ motion to vacate the automatic dismissal of their action for failure to file a statement of readiness (CPLR 3404; Rules of App. Div., 2d Dept., part 7, rule VIII), (2) granted leave to file the statement of readiness annexed to the moving papers, and (3) restored the action to the foot of the calendar. Order reversed, without costs, and motion denied, with leave to renew upon papers making a factual showing of merit. In our opinion, there are not enough facts presented to show that the method used in the operation was improper or contrary to custom and usage, or to show that there was negligence in its performance, or to substantiate the other allegations of negligence (see *Dembicer*v. *Rosenthal,*53 Misc 2d 777, affd. 20 A D 2d 758, lv. to app. den. 16 N Y 2d 483; *957
      *Mintzer*v. *Loeb, Rhoades & Co.,*10 A D 2d 27). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small Business Administration by the Final Order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division, dated October 22, 2007, the United States Small Business Administration hereby revokes the license of SBIC Partners II, L.P., a Delaware Limited Partnership, to function as a small business investment company under the Small Business Investment Company License No. 06/76-0316 issued to SBIC Partners II, L.P. on June 16, 1998 and said license is hereby declared null and void as of July 28, 2010.

U.S. Small Business Administration.

Sean J. Greene, 

Associate Administrator for Investment.

[FR Doc. 2010-31153 Filed 12-10-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
ex10_21.htm



    
      

    

     

    CAMBREX
CORPORATION

    Annual
Report on Form 10-K

    


    EXHIBIT
10.21

    


    REVISED
SCHEDULE OF PARTIES

    


    
      	
              NAME

            	 
      	
              TITLE

            	 
      	
              DATE OF AGREEMENT

            
	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
              Steven
      M. Klosk

            	 
      	
              President
      & Chief Executive Officer

            	 
      	
              02/06/06

            
	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
              Paolo
      Russolo

            	 
      	
              President,
      Profarmaco Milano

            	 
      	
              02/06/07

            
	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
              Gregory
      P. Sargen

            	 
      	
              Vice
      President & Chief Financial Officer

            	 
      	
              02/06/07
#### White House Manor, Ltd., Plaintiff, v Rose Ellen Benjamin et al., Respondents. Korean Presbyterian Church, Nonparty Appellant.

Submitted October 9, 2007;

decided January 10, 2008

Reported below, 42 AD3d 450.

On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. Motion for leave to appeal granted.
#### BLOSSOM, Appellant, v. CHISHOLM et al., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 19, 1914.)

Action by James B. Blossom against Mary R. Chisholm and another.

Gustav Lange, Jr., of New York City, for appellant.

J. H. Choate, Jr., of New York City, for respondents.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Order filed.
#### HART, Respondent, v. WICKERT, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

December 4, 1914.)

Action by Isabella Hart against Joseph H. Wickert. J. B. Henney, of New York City, for appellant. H. W. Unger, of New York City, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Order filed.
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Techdyne, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
L. Watts, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

               (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

               (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                                    /s/ David L. Watts
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    David L. Watts
                                                    Chief Financial Officer

August 14, 2002
(September 25, 1980)

#### In the Matter of the Claim of Antionette Abrams, Appellant. Philip Ross, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 9, 1979. Claimant, a secretary with Manufacturers Hanover, left that employment in May of 1977 when the travel involved became too burdensome for her to cope with. She was disqualified from receiving benefits upon a finding that her termination was without good cause. On or about August 1, 1979 claimant contends she went to work for the M & M Drug Store in Brooklyn at a salary of $125 a week. At the end of three weeks claimant was terminated and again applied for benefits. The local office, apparently acting on the theory that this employment with M & M broke the prior disqualification (Labor Law, § 593, subd 1, par [a]), paid claimant benefits amounting to $2,397 for the period from September 12, 1977 through March 26, 1978. At some point, the Industrial Commissioner concluded that the original disqualification was not terminated by the employment at M & M because, in fact, there was no legitimate employment relationship. The Administrative Law Judge concluded otherwise, but the board reversed his decision and sustained the determination of the Industrial Commissioner, holding the payment of $2,397 to be an overpayment and recoverable because there was no bona fide employment and because claimant had made willful false statements in order to obtain benefits. The factual situation presented and the *570issue raised are almost identical to those found in *Matter of Di Maria (Ross)*(72 AD2d 620). There, as here, we find uncontradicted evidence that the claimant worked three weeks for the new employer. The board, however, chose to conclude, as in *Di Maria (supra),*that the claimant’s testimony and that of the other witnesses was "not worthy of belief’. To support its conclusion the board disregarded the clear and uncontradicted evidence that claimant was employed by M & M and seized upon minor inconsequential errors or discrepancies in claimant’s testimony which she fully explained. Even if the claimant’s testimony was rendered questionable, her lack of credibility could in no way affect the unrebutted testimony of the employer and an associate *(Di Maria, supra).*While the board’s decision as to the facts is conclusive if supported by substantial evidence, we find no such evidence here. Substantial evidence is something more than speculation or conjecture which has no basis in the record, but arises from the visceral feelings of the board *(300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights,*45 NY2d 176, 180; *Di Maria, supra,*p 621). Since the board’s determination is not supported by substantial evidence, we must reverse. Decision reversed, with costs, and matter remitted to the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Main and Mikoll, JJ., concur; Herlihy, J., dissents and votes to affirm.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

December 20, 2007

NOTICE OF CORRECTION

From: Clerk’s Office

Case Style: Jeffers et al v. Russell County Board of Education et al 

Case Number: 3:06-cv-00685-WKW

This Notice of Correction was filed in the referenced case this date to correct the erroneous

PDF document previously attached by E-Filer. 

The correct PDF document is attached to this notice for your review. Reference is made to

document # 44 filed on December 20, 2007.

Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 45 Filed 12/20/2007 Page 1 of 1
BARBARA JEFFERS and

JOAN CRAIG,

Plaintiffs,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

v.

RUSSELL COUNTY BOARD OF

EDUCATION, et al.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 3:06-cv-685-WKW

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND

TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

COMES NOW Plaintiff, through counsel, and makes this Motion to Extend Time For

Plaintiff To Respond to Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment and would show

unto the Court:

1. Defendant Russell County Board of Education filed a Motion for Summary

Judgment, with accompanying brief, on December 14, 2007.

2 The Court gave Plaintiff until January 4, 2008 to respond to the motion.

3 Defendant Charles Nacrelli filed a Motion for Summary Judgment, with

accompanying brief, on December 17, 2007.

4. Together the motions, briefs and exhibits total a few hundred pages and cite

numerous cases.

5. Plaintiffs’ counsel’s office will be closed at least three days, in addition to

weekends, during the holiday period between the present and January 4, 2007.

6. Plaintiffs’ counsel needs just one additional week to adequately respond to the

motions for summary judgment.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs’ counsel moves the Court to grant a one-week extension for

filing the responses so that the deadline to have the responses to the Court and

Defendants’ attorneys would be up to and including January 11, 2008.

Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 45-2 Filed 12/20/2007 Page 1 of 2
Respectfully,

/s/W. Don Eddins (ASB-1424-S65W)

Attorney for Plaintiffs

337 E. Magnolia Avenue

Auburn, AL 36830

(334) 821-9981

Facsimile (334) 826-7700

doneddins@charter.net

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, W. Don Eddins, counsel for Plaintiffs, hereby certify that on the 20th day of

December, 2007, I have electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of Court using

the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following:

Sydney S. Smith, Esq.

Smith and Smith

Attorney for Russell Co. Bd. of Education

1503 Broad Street

Phenix City, AL 36830

ssmith4843@aol.com

Matthew C. Williams, Esq.

Estes, Sanders & Williams, LLC

Attorney from Mr. Nacrelli

3800 Colonnade Parkway, Ste. 330

Birmingham, AL 35243

matt@asw-law.com

/s/W. Don Eddins (ASB-1424-S65W)

Attorney for Plaintiffs

Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 45-2 Filed 12/20/2007 Page 2 of 2
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM 

PART I. TRANSCRIPT ORDER INFORMATION 

Appellant to complete and file with the District Court Clerk within 10 days of the filing of the notice of appeal in all cases, including 

those in which there was no hearing or for which no transcript is ordered.

Short Case Style: vs 

District Court No.: Date Notice of Appeal Filed: Court of Appeals No.: 

(If Available)

CHOOSE ONE: 9 No hearing 9 No transcript is required for appeal purposes 9 All necessary transcript(s) on file

9 I AM ORDERING A TRANSCRIPT OF THE FOLLOWING PROCEEDINGS:

Check appropriate box(es) and provide all information requested:

 HEARING DATE(S) JUDGE/MAGISTRATE COURT REPORTER NAME(S) 

9 Pre-Trial Proceedings 

9 Trial 

9 Sentence 

9 Other 

 

METHOD OF PAYMENT:

9 I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE CONTACTED THE COURT REPORTER(S) AND HAVE MADE SATISFACTORY

 ARRANGEMENTS WITH THE COURT REPORTER(S) FOR PAYING THE COST OF THE TRANSCRIPT.

9 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT. Attached for submission to District Judge/Magistrate is my completed CJA Form 24 requesting authorization

for government payment of transcript. [A transcript of the following proceedings will be provided ONLY IF SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED

in Item 13 on CJA Form 24: Voir Dire; Opening and Closing Statements of Prosecution and Defense; Prosecution Rebuttal; Jury Instructions.]

Ordering Counsel/Party: 

Name of Firm: 

Street Address/P.O. Box: 

City/State/Zip Code: Phone No. : 

I certify that I have completed and filed PART I with the District Court Clerk, sent a copy to the appropriate Court Reporter(s) if ordering a

transcript, mailed a filed copy to the Court of Appeals Clerk, and served all parties.

DATE: SIGNED: Attorney for: 

 

PART II. COURT REPORTER ACKNOWLEDGMENT 

Court Reporter to complete and file with the District Court Clerk within 10 days of receipt. The Court Reporter shall send

a copy to the Court of Appeals Clerk and to all parties.

Date Transcript Order received: 

9 Satisfactory arrangements for paying the cost of the transcript were completed on: 

9 Satisfactory arrangements for paying the cost of the transcript have not been made.

No. of hearing days: Estimated no. of transcript pages: Estimated filing date: 

DATE: SIGNED: Phone No. : 

NOTE: The transcript is due to be filed within 30 days of the date satisfactory arrangements for paying the cost of the

transcript were completed unless the Court Reporter obtains an extension of time to file the transcript.

 

PART III. NOTIFICATION THAT TRANSCRIPT HAS BEEN FILED IN DISTRICT COURT 

Court Reporter to complete and file with the District Court Clerk on date of filing transcript in District Court. The Court

Reporter shall send a copy to the Court of Appeals Clerk on the same date.

This is to certify that the transcript has been completed and filed with the district court on (date): 

Actual No. of Volumes and Hearing Dates: 

Date: Signature of Court Reporter: 

Rev. 2/06

Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 162 Filed 01/04/2008 Page 1 of 1
§ 140.5 Communications. Except where otherwise specified, all communications and reports concerning the regulations in this part and applications filed under them should be sent by mail addressed to: ATTN: Document Control Desk, Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, or Director, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, as appropriate, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; by hand delivery to the NRC's offices at 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland; or, where practicable, by electronic submission, for example, via Electronic Information Exchange, or CD-ROM. Electronic submissions must be made in a manner that enables the NRC to receive, read, authenticate, distribute, and archive the submission, and process and retrieve it a single page at a time. Detailed guidance on making electronic submissions can be obtained by visiting the NRC's Web site at *http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html ;* by e-mail to *MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov ;* or by writing the Office of the Chief Information Officer, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. The guidance discusses, among other topics, the formats the NRC can accept, the use of electronic signatures, and the treatment of nonpublic information. [73 FR 5726, Jan. 31, 2008, as amended at 74 FR 62686, Dec. 1, 2009; 79 FR 75742, Dec. 19, 2014; 80 FR 74982, Dec. 1, 2015; 84 FR 65646, Nov. 29, 2019]
§ 1042.510 Recruitment. ( a ) *Nondiscriminatory recruitment and hiring.* A recipient shall not discriminate on the basis of sex in the recruitment and hiring of employees. Where a recipient has been found to be presently discriminating on the basis of sex in the recruitment or hiring of employees, or has been found to have so discriminated in the past, the recipient shall recruit members of the sex so discriminated against so as to overcome the effects of such past or present discrimination.
( b ) *Recruitment patterns.* A recipient shall not recruit primarily or exclusively at entities that furnish as applicants only or predominantly members of one sex if such actions have the effect of discriminating on the basis of sex in violation of §§ 1042.500 through 1042.550.
Part 5632 - CONTRACT FINANCING       Subpart 5632.4 - ADVANCE PAYMENTS FOR NONCOMMERCIAL ITEMS                                                         5632.409-1 Recommendation for Approval.                                                                             Subpart 5632.7 - CONTRACT FUNDING (Removed August 2017)                                          Subpart 5632.9 - PROMPT PAYMENT (Removed June 2018)                                          Subpart 5632.70 - ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION AND PROCESSING OF PAYMENT REQUESTS AND RECEIVING REPORTS    Subpart 5632.4 - ADVANCE PAYMENTS FOR NONCOMMERCIAL ITEMS    *(Added June 2018)* 5632.409-1 Recommendation for Approval.    The approving authority for advanced payments is the Director of Procurement.Subpart 5632.7 - CONTRACT FUNDING (Removed August 2017)Subpart 5632.9 - PROMPT PAYMENT (Removed June 2018)Subpart 5632.70 - ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION AND PROCESSING OF PAYMENT REQUESTS AND RECEIVING REPORTS    *(Updated June 2018)*       See DCG for WAWF Alternate Payment Instructions.              HQ, United States Special Operations Command       Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L-K)       SOFARS 5632       February 2007
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 43-4 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 43-4 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:06-cr-00170-WHA-CSC Document 198 Filed 10/06/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### § 1016.22 Authority to reproduce Restricted Data.

Secret Restricted Data will not be reproduced without the written permission of the originator, his successor, or high authority. Confidential Restricted Data may be reproduced to the minimum extent necessary consistent with efficient operation without the necessity for permission.

[48 FR 36432, Aug. 10, 1983. Redesiganted at 82 FR 41508, Sept. 1, 2017]
2822.1503 Procedures for acquiring end products on the List of Products Requiring Contractor Certification as to Forced or Indentured Child Labor.       The contracting officer shall refer to the DOJ Inspector General for investigation, under FAR 22.1503(e), any matters relating to that section.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2822.15 - Prohibition of Acquisition of Products Produced by Forced or Indentured Child Labor
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

 UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA

DEBRA P. HACKETT, MAILING ADDRESS: 

 CLERK U. S. DISTRICT COURT ONE CHURCH ST., RM B-110

MONTGOMERY, AL 36104

(334) 954-3610

Thomas K. Kahn, Clerk

United States Court of Appeals

Eleventh Circuit Re: District Court No CV-06-C-708-S

56 Forsyth Street, N.W.

Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Court of Appeals No. 07-14446-B

GREAT SOUTHERN WOOD PRESERVING, INC. VS. AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE CO.

 

Enclosed are documents regarding an appeal in this matter. Please acknowledge receipt on the enclosed copy of this

letter.

9 Certified copy of NOTICE OF APPEAL, docket entries, judgment and opinion/order appealed from. 

9 First Notice of Appeal: Yes 9 No 9 Other notices (dates): 

9 Other: 

: The Judge or Magistrate Judge appealed from is: CHARLES S. COODY

9 The Court Reporter (s) is/are: 

9 A hearing was not held in the case. 9 An audio tape is available for transcription of the court hearing

9 The appellant DOCKET FEE has been paid: Yes 9 No 9 Date paid:

9 Motion for Certificate of Appealability and/or leave to proceed in forma pauperis is pending.

9 Appellant has been Granted 9 or Denied 9 leave to appeal IFP [In Forma Pauperis]

Enclosed: certified copy of Order & an updated docket sheet

9 Appellant has been Granted 9or Denied 9 the issuance of a Certificate of Appealability

Enclosed: certified copy of Order & an updated docket sheet

9 Copy of CJA form / order appointing counsel.

9 Certified record on appeal consisting of : Volume(s) of pleadings; PSI (s); Volume(s) of

 transcript; Folder(s) of exhibits/depositions; Supplemental file(s)

: ORIGINAL PAPERS: 2 Volume(s) of pleadings; 1 Volume(s) of transcript; X folders

9 This is an appeal of a bankruptcy order. Bankruptcy Judge 

9 This is a DEATH PENALTY appeal.

Very truly yours,

YOLANDA WILLIA

Deputy Clerk

Case 1:06-cv-00708-CSC Document 49 Filed 02/05/2008 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cr-00205-WHA-CSC Document 52 Filed 03/29/2007 Page 1 of 1