alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Subpart 2842.6 - Corporate Administrative

Contracting Officer

Parent topic: PART 2842 - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT SERVICES

2842.602 Assignment and location.

The HCA or designee is the agency head for the purposes of FAR 42.602(a).
Case 1:06-cv-00708-CSC Document 6 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:06-cv-00708-CSC Document 6 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 2 of 8
Case 1:06-cv-00708-CSC Document 6 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 3 of 8
Case 1:06-cv-00708-CSC Document 6 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 4 of 8
Case 1:06-cv-00708-CSC Document 6 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 5 of 8
Case 1:06-cv-00708-CSC Document 6 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 6 of 8
Case 1:06-cv-00708-CSC Document 6 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 7 of 8
Case 1:06-cv-00708-CSC Document 6 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 8 of 8
AO 470 Order of Temporary Detention

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ORDER OF TEMPORARY DETENTION

) PENDING HEARING PURSUANT TO

) BAIL REFORM ACT

v. )

 )

 ) CASE NO. 3:06CR208-MEF

JASON EDWARD COFIELD )

 )

ORDER ON MOTION

Upon consideration of the Government’s Motion for Detention Hearing (Doc. #4),

it is ORDERED that the motion be and is hereby GRANTED, that the detention hearing

in the above-case be and is hereby set for September 6, 2006, at 2:00 p.m. in The Frank

M. Johnson, Jr. Federal Building and United States Courthouse Complex, Montgomery,

Alabama, in the Fourth Floor Courtroom, Room 4-B, before the undersigned Magistrate 

Judge. 

Pending this hearing, the defendant shall be held in custody by the United States

Marshal and produced for the hearing.

Done this 5 day of September, 2006. th

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

*If not held immediately upon defendant's first appearance, the hearing may be continued for up to three

days upon the motion of the Government, or up to five days upon motion of the defendant. 18

U.S.C.§3142(f)(2). A hearing is required whenever the conditions set forth in 18 U.S.C.§3142(f) are

present. Subsection (1) sets forth the grounds that may be asserted only by the attorney for the

Government; subsection (2) states that a hearing is mandated upon the motion of the attorney for the

Government or upon the judicial officer's own motion if there is a serious risk that the defendant (a) will

flee or (b) will obstruct or attempt to obstruct justice, or threaten, injure, or intimidate, or attempt to

threaten, injure, or intimidate a prospective witness or juror.

Case 3:06-cr-00208-MEF-CSC Document 7 Filed 09/05/2006 Page 1 of 1
1532.003 Simplified acquisition procedures financing.       (a) *Scope.* This subpart provides for authorization of advance and interim payments on commercial item orders not exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold. Advance payments are payments that are made prior to performance. Interim payments are payments that are made during the order period according to a payment schedule.          (b) *Procedures for micropurchases.* Contracting officers may authorize advance and interim payments on orders for commercial items only at or below the micropurchase threshold.          (c) *Procedures for purchases exceeding micropurchase threshold.* Contracting officers must secure approval at one level above the contracting officer, on a case-by-case basis, for advance and interim payments on orders for commercial items exceeding the micropurchase threshold and not exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold. The contracting officer shall submit a recommendation for approval of financing terms, along with the supporting rationale for the action, to one level above the contracting officer. Remote simplified acquisition contracting officers (SACO) without one level above contracting officers at their locations shall forward recommendations through their OAM Advisors to secure one level above approval.          (d) *Supporting rationale.* Regardless of dollar value, the contracting officer shall document the file with supporting rationale demonstrating that the purchase meets the conditions of FAR 32.202-1(b)(1), (3) and (4).          (e) *Administration.* Regardless of dollar value, the contracting officer is responsible for ensuring that supplies or services have been delivered. The contracting officer shall document the file with evidence of receipt of supplies or services throughout the order period as appropriate to the acquisition.          (f) *Clause.* The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 1552.232-74, Payments - Simplified Acquisition Procedures Financing, in solicitations and orders that will provide simplified acquisition procedures financing.    **Parent topic:** PART 1532 - CONTRACT FINANCING
628.309-70 DOSAR provisions and clauses.

(a) The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 652.228–70, Defense Base Act—Covered

Contractor Employees, in all solicitations for services and construction to be performed outside of

the United States.

(b) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 652.228–71, Workers' Compensation Insurance

(Defense Base Act)—Services, in solicitations and contracts for services to be performed outside of

the United States when there is a reasonable expectation that offers will include covered contractor

employees, as defined in 628.305(b). If the contracting officer is unsure as to whether offers will

include covered contractor employees, the contracting officer shall insert the clause.

Parent topic: Subpart 628.3—Insurance
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Energy epubsupdate**** 
SuDocNumber:E9.9/2:
ItemNumber:0430-P-13(online)
CGPsystem Number:000611941
 
 - epubs_2002_10-2003_03.pdfepubs_2003_04-09.pdfepubs_2003_10_2004_03.pdfepubs_2004_10-2005_03.pdfepubs_2005_04-06.pdfepubs_2005_07-09.pdfepubs_2005_10-12.pdfepubs_2006_01-06.pdfepubs_2006_07-09.pdfepubs_2006_10-2007_03.pdfepubs_2007_04-09.pdf
 
 **
WELLS
FARGO
Commercial Mortgage Servicing
D1086-120, 12th Floor
550 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334


ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference  is  hereby  made  to  that  certain  Pooling and  Servicing  Agreement  dated
as of September 1, 2012, by and among Citigroup Commercial Mortgages Inc., as Depositor, Wells
Fargo  Bank, National  Association,  as  Master Servicer,  Midland  Loan  Services,  a division of  PNC
Bank,  National  Association,  as  Special  Servicer,  Situs  Holdings,  LLC,  as  Operating  Advisor,
Citibank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, with
respect  to  Commercial  Mortgage  Pass-Through  Certificates  Series  2012-GC8  (the  "Agreement").
Capitalized  terms  used  herein  not  otherwise  defined  shall  have  the  meanings  assigned  in  the
Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 10.08 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of
Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

1.

A  review  of  the  activities  of  the  Master  Servicer  during  the  period  from  January  1,
2014  through  December  31,  2014  (the  "Reporting  Period"),  and  of  its  performance
per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

2.

To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled
all  of  its  obligations  under  the  Agreement  in  all  material  respects  throughout  the
Reporting Period.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 6thday of


March 2015.



/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober
Executive Vice President
Wells Fargo Bank















Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.








Together we'll go far
#### § 19.20 Employee protection.

Employment discrimination by a licensee, a holder of a certificate of compliance issued under part 76 of this chapter or regulated entity subject to the requirements in this part as delineated in § 19.2(a), or a contractor or subcontractor of a licensee, a holder of a certificate of compliance issued under part 76 of this chapter, or regulated entity subject to the requirements in this part as delineated in § 19.2(a), against an employee for engaging in protected activities under this part or parts 30, 40, 50, 52, 54, 60, 61, 63, 70, 72, 76, or 150 of this chapter is prohibited.

[72 FR 49485, Aug. 28, 2007]
(May 18, 2006)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Leroy Cain, Appellant.

[814 NYS2d 417]

Mugglin, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Breslin, J.), rendered November 27, 2002, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted assault in the first degree.

Defendant was charged by indictment with attempted murder in the second degree, attempted assault in the first degree, assault in the second degree, criminal use of a firearm in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree in connection with an incident that occurred in the City of Albany wherein defendant shot another man in the legs. Pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement, defendant pleaded guilty to attempted assault in the first degree in full satisfaction of the indictment, with the understanding that he would be sentenced to eight years in prison followed by five years of postrelease supervision. As part of his guilty plea, defendant agreed to waive his right to appeal. County Court thereafter sentenced defendant as agreed and defendant now appeals.

Initially, defendant argues that his waiver of the right to appeal was not valid because County Court’s inquiry into his understanding of the waiver was deficient. We agree. During the plea colloquy, County Court enumerated several rights that defendant was relinquishing by pleading guilty and concomitantly inquired whether he understood that he also “[gave] up [his] right to appeal this process we’re now going through.” In so doing, the court failed to adequately distinguish defendant’s waiver of the right to appeal from those rights which are automatically forfeited upon a plea of guilty *(see People v Lopez,*6 NY3d 248, 256-257 [2006]).

In light of defendant’s invalid waiver of the right to appeal, we now review his arguments concerning the severity of the sentence imposed and the effectiveness of counsel. Defendant was sentenced, in accordance with the plea agreement, to a term of imprisonment which falls within the permissible statutory range and, given the violent nature of defendant’s underlying conduct, the record does not reveal any abuse of discretion or extraordinary circumstances warranting reduction (see *People*
      *1158
      *v Higgins,*19 AD3d 877, 877 [2005], *lv denied*5 NY3d 828 [2005]; *People v Archangel,*272 AD2d 686, 686 [2000]). Likewise, the record indicates that counsel negotiated an advantageous plea on behalf of defendant and there is nothing in the record which casts doubt upon the apparent effectiveness of counsel *(see People v Ford,*86 NY2d 397, 404 [1995]; *People v Scott,*12 AD3d 716, 717 [2004]). We, therefore, find defendant’s present argument that counsel was ineffective because he “failed to . . . resist” the imposition of an excessive sentence to be meritless.

Mercure, J.P., Peters, Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

March 24, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

135376 Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver & (59) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, KATRINA WASHINGTON, Personal Justices Representative of the Estate of Dave Washington, Jr., Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 135376 COA: 258691 Wayne CC: 03-338177-NH WILLIAM A. JACKSON, M.D., HUGH ROLLOCKS, M.D. and LENARD FOUCHE, M.D., Defendants,

and

COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS, INC., f/k/a UNITED COMMUNITY URGENT CARE CENTER, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion to dism iss for lack of jurisdiction is DENIED. The application for leave to appeal the October 23, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be revi ewed by this Court.

l0317 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 24, 2008

Clerk
3033.214 Alternative dispute resolution

(ADR).

(c) The Administrative Dispute Resolution Act (ADRA) of 1996, as amended, 5 U.S.C. 571, et seq.,

authorizes and encourages agencies to use mediation, conciliation, arbitration, and other techniques

for the prompt and informal resolution of disputes, and for other purposes. CBCA guidance on ADR

may be obtained at http://www.gsbca.gsa.gov/CBCA-17712-v1-CBCA_ADR_INFORMATION.pdf or

from the CBCA upon request. ADR procedures may be used—

(1) When there is mutual consent by the parties to participate in the ADR process (with consent

being obtained either before or after an issue in controversy has arisen);

(2) Prior to the submission of a claim; and

(3) In resolution of a formal claim.

Parent topic: Subpart 3033.2—Disputes and Appeals
Case 2:06-cv-00753-MEF-CSC Document 2 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00753-MEF-CSC Document 2 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00753-MEF-CSC Document 2 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00753-MEF-CSC Document 2 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 4 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00753-MEF-CSC Document 2-2 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 1 of 20
Case 2:06-cv-00753-MEF-CSC Document 2-2 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 2 of 20
Case 2:06-cv-00753-MEF-CSC Document 2-2 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 3 of 20
Case 2:06-cv-00753-MEF-CSC Document 2-2 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 4 of 20
Case 2:06-cv-00753-MEF-CSC Document 2-2 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 5 of 20
Case 2:06-cv-00753-MEF-CSC Document 2-2 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 6 of 20
Case 2:06-cv-00753-MEF-CSC Document 2-2 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 7 of 20
Case 2:06-cv-00753-MEF-CSC Document 2-2 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 8 of 20
Case 2:06-cv-00753-MEF-CSC Document 2-2 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 9 of 20
Case 2:06-cv-00753-MEF-CSC Document 2-2 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 10 of 20
Case 2:06-cv-00753-MEF-CSC Document 2-2 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 11 of 20
Case 2:06-cv-00753-MEF-CSC Document 2-2 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 12 of 20
Case 2:06-cv-00753-MEF-CSC Document 2-2 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 13 of 20
Case 2:06-cv-00753-MEF-CSC Document 2-2 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 14 of 20
Case 2:06-cv-00753-MEF-CSC Document 2-2 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 15 of 20
Case 2:06-cv-00753-MEF-CSC Document 2-2 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 16 of 20
Case 2:06-cv-00753-MEF-CSC Document 2-2 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 17 of 20
Case 2:06-cv-00753-MEF-CSC Document 2-2 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 18 of 20
Case 2:06-cv-00753-MEF-CSC Document 2-2 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 19 of 20
Case 2:06-cv-00753-MEF-CSC Document 2-2 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 20 of 20
*

The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 46(d) (2000).

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6664

DAVID AMBERGER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections; JOHN JABE, Deputy

Director of Operations Virginia Department of

Corrections; LARRY HUFFMAN, Regional Director

of Virginia Department of Corrections; LARRY

W. JARVIS, Warden of Bland Correctional

Center; VIRGINIA BANDY, Institutional

Operations Administrator of Bland Correctional

Center; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER DOE, Bland

Correctional Center; JANE DOE, Correctional

Officer Bland Correctional Center,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior

District Judge. (7:06-cv-00162-jlk)

Submitted: October 31, 2006 Decided: November 3, 2006

Before WILLIAMS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.*

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
- 2 -

David Amberger, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

David Amberger appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant

Amberger’s motion to file supplemental pleadings and documents,

deny Amberger’s motion for the appointment of counsel, deny his

motion for a temporary restraining order, and affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Amberger v. Johnson, No.

7:06-cv-00162-jlk (W.D. Va. Apr. 3, 2006). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
2436.602-5 Short selection processes for

contracts not to exceed the small purchase

limitation.

The short selection process described in FAR 36.602-5(a) is authorized for use for contracts not

expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold.

Parent topic: Subpart 2436.6 - Architect-Engineer Services
BALTIMORE RISE NW.

SCALE 1:100,000

L-155

CORRECTED METERS

SS
ee NN Nn

IN
— \ RS PDRLN
5

gw
Yo Za) eee

7 } J ——— . %
ay ZA S Sy

my, A Lf
fen

oye

»)
5)

[
RN

74° 00!
** **

**EXHIBIT 35.1**

** **

**World Omni Financial Corp.**

**Servicer Compliance Statement**

**Pursuant to Item 1123**

**of Regulation AB**

** **

** **

** **

I, Victor A. De Jesús,do hereby certify that I am the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of World Omni Financial Corp., a Florida corporation,and further certify on behalf of World Omni Financial Corp. in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer”) under theSale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of October 24, 2012 (the “Agreement”), among World Omni Auto Receivables Trust2012-B, as Issuing Entity, World Omni Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor, and the Servicer, as follows:

 

(i)	A review ofthe activities of the Servicer during the period covered by the issuing entity’s Annual Report on form 10-K for the fiscalyear ended December 31, 2014 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance under the Agreement, has been made undermy supervision.

 

(ii)	To the bestof my knowledge, based on the review described above, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement inall material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereuntoset my hand as of March 13, 2015.

 

 

WORLD OMNI FINANCIAL CORP.

 

 

By: /s/ Victor A. De Jesús

Name: Victor A. De Jesús

Title: Vice President, Finance and Administration /

  Chief Financial Officer
Subpart 2845.1 - General

Parent topic: PART 2845 - GOVERNMENT PROPERTY

2845.105 Contractors' property management system

compliance.

The contractor's records for Government-furnished property may be kept as a separate account in

the bureau's internal property management system, in which case the contracting officer or formally

designated property administrator shall serve as custodian of the account.

2845.105-70 Contractor reporting of Government-furnished

property.

(a) In compliance with FAR 45.105, by January 31 of each year, DOJ contractors shall furnish the

cognizant contracting officer an annual report of the DOJ property for which they are accountable as

of the end of the calendar year.

(b) By March 1 of each year, bureaus shall submit to the FASS, JMD, a summary report of agency

property furnished under each contract as of the end of the calendar year. The report shall include a

listing of Government-furnished property for all contracts for which the bureau maintains the official

Government records.
§ 1022.21 Property management. ( a ) If property in a floodplain or wetland is proposed for license, easement, lease, transfer, or disposal to non-Federal public or private parties, DOE shall: ( 1 ) Identify those uses that are restricted under applicable floodplain or wetland regulations and attach other appropriate restrictions to the uses of the property; or
( 2 ) Withhold the property from conveyance.
( b ) Before completing any transaction that DOE guarantees, approves, regulates, or insures that is related to an area located in a floodplain, DOE shall inform any private party participating in the transaction of the hazards associated with locating facilities or structures in the floodplain.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Section
      1350 Certification**





In
      connection with the quarterly report of China Industrial Waste Management,
      Inc.
      (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Dong Jinqing, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




August
              14,
              2008
            
            
            /s/
              Dong
              JinqingDong
              JinqingChief
              Executive
              Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.