alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 1:06-mj-70-DRB

 )

OSCAR MARTINEZ-RAMIREZ )

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD PROSEQUENDUM

TO THE HONORABLE DELORES R. BOYD, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JUDGE:

Comes now the United States of America, by and through its Attorney for the Middle District

of Alabama, and represents and shows unto the Court that there is pending in the United States

District Court for the Middle District of Alabama a Complaint against Oscar Martinez-Ramirez now

in custody of Wakulla County Jail, Crawfordville, Florida, and that said cause is set for arraignment

at Montgomery, Alabama, in this Honorable Court on August 30, 2006, at 10:00 a.m.

WHEREFORE, the United States Attorney prays that your Honor will direct the Clerk of this

Court to issue a WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD PROSEQUENDUM addressed to Wakulla

County Jail, Crawfordville, Florida, commanding them to deliver said prisoner to any United States

Marshal or Deputy United States Marshal and directing said Marshal or Deputy to bring said prisoner

before this Honorable Court to be held at Montgomery, Alabama, on August 30, 2006, at 10:00 a.m.

Respectfully submitted this the 28th of July, 2006.

LEURA GARRETT CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/ A. Clark Morris

A. CLARK MORRIS

Assistant United States Attorney

Post Office Box 197

Montgomery, Alabama 36101-0197

334.223.7280

334.223.7135 fax

clark.morris@usdoj.gov

Case 1:06-mj-00070-DRB Document 4 Filed 07/28/2006 Page 1 of 1
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 1:06-mj-70-DRB

 )

OSCAR MARTINEZ-RAMIREZ )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the foregoing motion, and for good cause shown, the Court is of the

opinion that said motion should be and the same is hereby granted. It is, therefore, ORDERED that

the Clerk of this Court be and is hereby DIRECTED to issue a WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD

PROSEQUENDUM addressed to Wakulla County Jail, Crawfordville, Florida, commanding them

to deliver the said Oscar Martinez-Ramirez to any United States Marshal or Deputy United States

Marshal and directing said Marshal or Deputy to bring said prisoner before this Court to be held at

Montgomery, Alabama, on August 30, 2006, at 10:00 a.m. and to return said prisoner to said official

when the Court shall have finished with him.

DONE this the ______ day of __________________, 2006.

______________________________

DELORES R. BOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-mj-00070-DRB Document 4-2 Filed 07/28/2006 Page 1 of 1
§ 1304.103 Privacy Act inquiries. ( a ) *Requests regarding the contents of record systems.* Any person wanting to know whether the Board's systems of records contains a record pertaining to him or her may file a request in person or in writing, via the internet, or by telephone.
( b ) *Requests in persons* may be submitted at the Board's headquarters located at 2300 Clarendon Blvd., Suite 1300; Arlington, VA. Requests should be marked “Privacy Act Request” on each page of the request and on the front of the envelope and directed to the Privacy Act Officer.
( c ) *Requests in writing* may be sent to: Privacy Act Officer, U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board, 2300 Clarendon Blvd., Suite 1300, Arlington, VA 22201. “Privacy Act Request” should be written on the envelope and each page of the request.
( d ) *Requests via the internet* may be made on the Board's Web site at *www.nwtrb.gov ,* using the “Contact NWTRB” icon on the bottom of the Home page. The words “Privacy Act” should appear on the subject line.
( e ) *Telephone requests* may be made by calling the Board's Privacy Act Officer at 703-235-4473.
Exhibit 10.21


 


	 	January
    16, 2017

     



  


Development Yangtze River


 


41-43 John Street, # 2A 


 


New York, NY 10038 


 


Re: Month-to-Month Extension
of Market/Non-Regulated Lease


 


The owner hereby notifies
you that your lease will expire on 03/31/18


 


Dear tenants:


 


This office serves as the managing agent for the above
referenced premises.


 


Your Current Rent: $7395.00


 


We hereby offer you a one year extension on your
lease effective 04/01/18 through 03/31/19 at the rate $7395.00 per month. (Same Rate)


 


If you have any questions, please call Rose Dass
(212)-206-6036


 


Please indicate your decision below and forward this letter
to our office by return mail. A countersigned copy will be returned to you for your records. Pursuant to your lease you are required
to notify the owner 60 days before lease expiration whether or not you are going to renew the lease.


 


	I accept said offer:	 	I do not accept and will vacate on:	 
	 	 	 	 
		 	 	 
	Signature	 	Signature	 
	 	1/29/18	 	 


 


	TIME EQUITIES, INC. 	 	55
    Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10003-4398 	 
	55 FIFTH AVE. — 15TH FL. 	 	Phone: 212-206-6000
    ♦ Fax: 212-206-6113 	 
	NEW YORK, NY 10003	 	WWW.TIMEEQUITIES.COM
# 1514.406 Mistakes in bids.

**Parent topic:**Subpart 1514.4 - Opening of Bids and Award of Contract
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Simclar, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen P. Donnelly,
      Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Stephen P. DonnellyStephen
                P. Donnelly, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and
                SecretarySimclar,
                Inc.November
                17, 2008
§ 205.270 Off-the-record communications. ( a ) In any proceeding which is subject to this subpart— ( 1 ) No interested person shall make an off-the-record communication or knowingly cause an off-the-record communication to be made to any decisional employee.
( 2 ) No decisional employee shall make an off-the-record communication or knowingly cause an off-the-record communication to be made to any interested person.
( 3 ) A decisional employee who receives, makes, or knowingly causes to be made an oral communication prohibited by this section shall prepare a memorandum stating the substance of the communication and any responses made to it.
( 4 ) With 48 hours of receiving, making or knowingly causing to be made a communication prohibited by this section, a decisional employee shall deliver all written off-the-record communications and all memoranda prepared in compliance with paragraph (a)(3) of this section to the Director of the Coal and Electricity Division, ERA, who will immediately place the materials described above in the public record associated with the adjudication, available for public inspection.
( 5 ) Upon receipt of a communication knowingly made or knowingly caused to be made by a participant in violation of this section, the Administrator or presiding officer may, to the extent consistent with the interests of justice and the applicable statutory policy, require the participant to show cause why his or her claim or interest in the adjudication should not be dismissed, denied, disregarded, or otherwise adversely affected on account of the violation.
( 6 ) The prohibitions of this section shall apply beginning at the time an adjudication is noticed for hearing (or the person responsible for the communication acquires knowledge that it will be noticed), a protest is filed, or a petition or notice to intervene in opposition to the requested Department action is filed, whichever occurs first.
( b ) The prohibition, cited at 18 CFR 1.30(f), against participation in the decision-making process by Department employees who perform investigative or trial functions in an adjudication, shall no longer be applicable to ERA.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 5, 2011

d0928 

# Order

October 5, 2011

143101

RAMCO HARTLAND L.L.C., RAMCO RM HARTLAND SC L.L.C., and RAMCO RM HARTLAND DISPOSITION L.L.C.,Plaintiffs-CounterDefendants-Appellants,

v SC: 143101 COA: 294890 Oakland CC: 2008-093556-CK LANDMARK/MANSOUR DEVELOPMENT L.L.C., Defendant-Appellee,

and

HANI MANSOUR,Defendant-CounterPlaintiff-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 8, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 241 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                  House Calendar No. 30
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 241

                          [Report No. 109-59]

Providing for the adoption of the resolution (H. Res. 240) amending the 
 Rules of the House of Representatives to reinstate certain provisions 
 of the rules relating to procedures of the Committee on Standards of 
 Official Conduct to the form in which those provisions existed at the 
                      close of the 108th Congress.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2005

    Mr. Dreier, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
Providing for the adoption of the resolution (H. Res. 240) amending the 
 Rules of the House of Representatives to reinstate certain provisions 
 of the rules relating to procedures of the Committee on Standards of 
 Official Conduct to the form in which those provisions existed at the 
                      close of the 108th Congress.

    Resolved,  that upon adoption of this resolution, House Resolution 
240 is hereby adopted.




                                                  House Calendar No. 30

109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 241

                          [Report No. 109-59]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Providing for the adoption of the resolution (H. Res. 240) amending the 
 Rules of the House of Representatives to reinstate certain provisions 
 of the rules relating to procedures of the Committee on Standards of 
 Official Conduct to the form in which those provisions existed at the 
                      close of the 108th Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 27, 2005

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
COURTROOM DEPUTY MINUTES DATE: AUGUST 18, 2006 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

DIGITAL RECORDING: 2:13 - 2:18 

/ INITIAL APPEARANCE

 DETENTION HEARING 

 REMOVAL HEARING (Rule 5) 

 ARRAIGNMENT 

 ARRAIGNMENT on SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT 

 PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION 

PRESIDING MAG. JUDGE CHARLES S. COODY DEPUTY CLERK: WANDA STINSON 

CASE NO. 2:06CR206-MHT-CSC DEFT. NAME: ALTHEIA ADRIANNE SCOTT

USA: CHRISTOPHER SNYDER ATTY: PATRICIA KEMP 

Type Counsel: ( ) Retained; ( ) Panel CJA; ( ) Waived; ( / ) CDO ;

USPTSO/ USPO: TAMARA MARTIN 

Defendant does / does NOT need an interpreter; NAME: 

/Kars. Date of Arrest 8/18/06 or  Rule 5 Arrest

/kia. Deft. First Appearance. Advised of rights/charges.  Pro/Sup Rel Violator

/ Finaff. Financial Affidavit executed  to be obtained by PTS; / ORAL Motion for Appt. Of Counsel. 

/ koappted ORAL ORDER appointing Federal Defender - Notice to be filed.

20appt. Panel Attorney Appointed;  to be appointed - prepare voucher

 Deft. Advises he will retain counsel. Has retained 

/ Government’ s ORAL (kgoralm.) Motion for Detention Hrg.  To be followed by written motion;

 Government’ sWRITTEN Motion for Detention Hrg. filed. 

/ DETENTION HRG  held; / Set for 8/22/06 @ 9:00 a.m. ;  Prelim. Hrg  Set for 

 kotempdtn. ORDER OF TEMPORARY DETENTION PENDING HEARING entered

kodtn. ORDER OF DETENTION PENDING TRIAL entered

 kocondrls. Release order entered.  Deft. advised of conditions of release.

kbnd.  BOND EXECUTED (M/D AL charges) $ Deft released (kloc LR)

 BOND EXECUTED (R.5 charges) - deft to report to originating district as ordered

 Loc.(LC) Bond NOT executed. Deft to remain in Marshal’ s custody

 ko. Deft. ORDERED REMOVED to originating district

 krmvhrg. Identity/Removal Hearing  set for _________;  WAIVER of Rule 5 & 5.1 Hearings

 kwvprl. Waiver of Preliminary hearing; 

 Court findsPROBABLE CAUSE. Defendant bound over to the Grand Jury.

Karr. ARRAIGNMENT SET FOR:  HELD. Plea of NOT GUILTY entered. 

  Trial Term ;  PRETRIAL CONFERENCE DATE: 

 DISCOVERY DISCLOSURES DATE: 

 Krmknn. NOTICEto retained Criminal Defense Attorney handed to Counsel

 Kwvspt Waiver of Speedy Trial Act Rights Executed. 

Case 2:06-cr-00206-MHT-CSC Document 5 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cv-00749-ID-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 1 of 1
# Subpart 808.8 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**PART 808 - REQUIRED SOURCES OF SUPPLIES AND SERVICES
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 21

- 00092

- CR

___________________________

On Appeal from Criminal District Court No. 2 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 0780991D

Before Birdwel l, Bassel, and Womack, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### S AMUEL 

### L YN 

### R EAVES A 

### / K 

### / A 

### S AMUEL 

### L. R EAVES 

### , Appellant

V



### . T HE 

### S TATE OF 

### T EXAS2 MEMORANDUM OPINION On July 12 , 2021, Samuel Lyn Reaves attempted to appeal his conviction for felony driving while intoxicated, for which judgment was rendered on October 25,
2001. 1 Because Reaves filed his notice of appeal nearly twenty years after it was due, we notified him of our concern that we lacked jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a). We explained that unless he or another party filed a response showing grounds for

con tinuing the appeal, it could be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3. Reaves filed a response, but it did not relate to the issue of timeliness or anything that would show grounds for continuing the appeal. 2 Our appellate jurisdi ction is triggered through a timely notice of appeal. Pfeiffer
v. State , 363 S.W.3d 594, 599 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012). If a notice of appeal is not timely filed, we do not have jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal and may take no

1 In his notice of appeal, Reaves contends that the punishment assessed exceeded what he and the State agreed to, that the board of pardons and paroles somehow converted his sentence from an offense punishable as a second

- degree felony to one punishable as a first

- degree felony, that no evidence support ed his conviction, that due process was violated, that he received ineffective assistance of counsel, and that he was incompet ent at the time of his plea agreement.

2 In his response, Reaves protests that there was no evidence to support his conviction, that his sentence was unfair because it was at the high end of the punishment range, and that ineffective assistance of counsel r endered his plea involuntary.3 action other t han to dismiss it. Slaton v. State , 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). Because Reaves’s notice of appeal was untimely, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a), 43.2(f).
Per Curiam
Do Not Publish Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
Delivered: August 19, 2021
Exhibit 32.1


                  Certification of Chief Executive Officer and
                   Acting Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
(the "Form 10-QSB") for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 of Universal Detection
Technology (the "Issuer").

     I, Jacques Tizabi, the Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial
Officer of Issuer certify that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge:

     (i)  the Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Issuer.

Date:  May 25, 2005



 /s/ Jacques Tizabi
---------------------------------------------
By:     Jacques Tizabi
Title:  Chief Executive Officer and Acting
        Chief Financial Officer
PART 22 –– APPLICATION OF LABOR LAWS

TO GOVERNMENT ACQUISITIONS

 22.001 Definitions.

 SUBPART 22.1 –– BASIC LABOR POLICIES

 22.101 Labor relations.

 22.101-3 Reporting labor disputes.

22.001 Definitions.

(S-90) Unless there is an associated service being offered with the telecommunications and that

associated service is billed separately, the leasing/provisioning of the telecommunications circuit

(commoditized bandwidth) is not a “service contract.” IAW FAR 22.001, a “service contract means

any Government contract, or subcontract thereunder, the principal purpose of which is to furnish

services in the United States through the use of service employees...”

SUBPART 22.1 –– BASIC LABOR POLICIES

22.101 Labor relations.

22.101-3 Reporting labor disputes.

(S-90) After becoming aware of labor disputes (actual or potential) involving a contractor, the

contracting officer shall take prompt action consistent with the following instructions:

(1) Notify local legal counsel and the HCO by the most expeditious means. When possible, the HCO

should be given an in-depth briefing regarding the actual or potential labor disputes by the

contracting officer.

(2) Notify the affected customers by message or letter of the actual or potential labor disputes that

could delay, or threaten to delay the timely contract performance.

(S-91) Legal counsel, ICW the HCO, will furnish all pertinent information relating to actual or

potential labor disputes promptly to the HCA and the DISA Labor Advisor. The Labor Advisor for

DISA is the Associate General Counsel, Personnel and Employment Law.
1603.7003 Contract clause.

The clause at 1652.203–70 shall be inserted in all FEHBP contracts.

Parent topic: Subpart 1603.70—Misleading, Deceptive, or Unfair Advertising
Case 1:06-cr-00201-WHA-CSC Document 61 Filed 10/10/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### § 764.455 Potential training vendors.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 65042, Aug. 8, 2024.

The Agency will contract for training services with State or private providers of production and financial management training services.
# SUBCHAPTER E—GENERAL CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS    

- PART 1629—TAXES 
- PART 1631—CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES 
- PART 1632—CONTRACT FINANCING 
- PART 1633 [RESERVED] 

- PART 1629—TAXES     - Subpart 1629.4—Contract Clauses     - 1629.402   Foreign contracts.
- PART 1631—CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES     - Subpart 1631.1—Definitions     - 1631.1   Definitions.
  - Subpart 1631.2—Contracts With Commercial Organizations     - 1631.200   Scope of subpart.
    - 1631.201-70   Credits.
    - 1631.203   Indirect costs.
    - 1631.203-70   Allocation techniques.
    - 1631.203-71   Business unit General and Administrative (G&A) expenses.
    - 1631.203-72   Home office expense.
    - 1631.205   Selected costs.
    - 1631.205-10   Cost of money.
    - 1631.205-41   Taxes.
    - 1631.205-70   FEHBP public relations and advertising costs.
    - 1631.205-71   FEHBP bad debts.
    - 1631.205-72   FEHBP compensation for personal services.
    - 1631.205-73   FEHBP interest expense.
    - 1631.205-74   FEHBP losses on other contracts.
    - 1631.205-75   Selling costs.
    - 1631.205-76   Trade, business, technical, and professional activity costs.
    - 1631.205-77   FEHBP start-up and other nonrecurring costs.
    - 1631.205-78   FEHBP printed material costs.
    - 1631.205-79   Mandatory statutory reserves.
    - 1631.205-80   Major subcontractor service charges.
    - 1631.205-81   Inferred reasonableness.
    - 1631.205-82   Audits.
- PART 1632—CONTRACT FINANCING     - Subpart 1632.1—General     - 1632.170   Recurring premium payments to carriers.
    - 1632.171   Clause—community-rated contracts.
    - 1632.172   Clause—experience-rated contracts.
  - Subpart 1632.6—Contract Debts     - 1632.607   Tax credit.
    - 1632.617   Contract clause.
  - Subpart 1632.7—Contract Funding     - 1632.770   Contingency reserve payments.
    - 1632.771   Non-commingling of FEHBP funds.
    - 1632.772   Contract clause.
  - Subpart 1632.8—Assignment of Claims     - 1632.806-70   Contract clause.
- PART 1633 [RESERVED]
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 33 (Friday, February 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 7542]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3171]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 3 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of Florida, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Arkansas, 
and the Territory of Puerto Rico)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 3 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, 
ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Monday, March 8, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sallie Chavez at 1-888-912-1227 or 
954-423-7979.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Area 3 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Monday, March 8, 2010, at 2:30 p.m. Eastern Time via telephone 
conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, 
notification of intent to participate must be made with Sallie Chavez. 
For more information please contact Ms. Chavez at 1-888-912-1227 or 
954-423-7979, or write TAP Office, 1000 South Pine Island Road, Suite 
340, Plantation, FL 33324, or post comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: February 4, 2010.
Linda Rivera,
Senior Program Analyst, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2010-3171 Filed 2-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P