alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: West, Jeffrey L

To: Kordzi, Joe

Cc: Metcalf, Dean R

Subject: RE: Tolk Regional Haze

Date: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 12:40:48 PM

Yes.

From: Kordzi, Joe [mailto:Kordzi.Joe@epa.gov] 

Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 11:40 AM

To: West, Jeffrey L

Cc: Metcalf, Dean R

Subject: RE: Tolk Regional Haze

Thanks.  Would you also provide basic information on the type of mercury control that is employed

at Tolk – type of sorbent and how it is injected? 

From: West, Jeffrey L [mailto:jeffrey.l.west@xcelenergy.com]

Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 8:45 AM

To: Kordzi, Joe

Subject: Tolk Regional Haze

Joe:

I am out of the office traveling this morning and received your voice mail.  We will push to gather the

information and get you expeditiously.  I will be in touch.

Jeff West

Xcel Energy | Responsible By Nature

Director, Environmental Services

1800 Larimer Street, Suite 1300, Denver, CO 80202

P: 303-571-2762 C: 806-570-8914 F: 303-294-2859

E: Jeffrey.L.West@xcelenergy.com
EXHIBIT 10.1


                               ASTOR CAPITAL, INC.
                         9595 WILSHIRE BLVD., SUITE 700
                             BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212


As of April 29, 2004


Mr. Jacques Tizabi
Chief Executive Officer
Universal Detection Technologies, Inc.
9595 Wilshire Blvd.
Beverly Hills, CA  90212

      RE:  AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR INVESTMENT BANKING AND ADVISORY
           SERVICES

Reference is made to the certain Agreement for Investment Banking and Advisory
Services, between ASTOR CAPITAL, INC. ("Astor") and UNIVERSAL DETECTION
TECHNOLOGY, INC. ("UDTT"), dated June 1, 2003 (the Agreement").

In consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, as well
as, other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which
is acknowledged, the parties agree to amend the Agreement as follows:

     1.   The parties agree that for the period commencing on May 1, 2004 and
          ending on February 28, 2005, the monthly cash fee payable each month
          to Astor shall be reduced to FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($5,000.00).

     2.   The Term of the Agreement shall be extended until June 30, 2005 and
          shall be automatically extended for successive one (1) year periods
          unless terminated in writing by either party not less than sixty (60)
          days prior the expiration of the proceeding year.

Except as set forth above, all other terms and conditions contained in the
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect unless and until modified in
writing and signed by the parties.

If the aforementioned is accepted and agreed to, please indicate same by
affixing your signature below, and together with ours shall represent the entire
agreement.

Sincerely,
ASTOR CAPITAL, INC.



By: /s/ Ali Moussavi
    -------------------------
Its:  Managing Partner



Accepted, Understood & Agreed:
UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY, INC.



By: /s/ Jacques Tizabi
    -------------------------
Its:  Chief Executive Officer
§ 1015.209 Tax refund offset. ( a ) DOE may authorize the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to offset a tax refund to satisfy delinquent debt in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3720A, Reduction of Tax Refund by Amount of Debt. Treasury has issued regulations implementing the tax refund offset as part of Treasury's mandatory centralized offset at 31 CFR 285.2, Offset of Tax Refund to Collect Past-Due, Legally Enforceable Non-tax Debt. DOE has adopted 31 U.S.C. 3720A and 31 CFR 285.2 in their entirety. The due process requirements of 31 U.S.C. 3720A are contained in §§ 1015.203(b)(4), and 1015.203(e) of this part.
( b ) As described in § 1015.201(e) of this part, under the DCIA (31 U.S.C. 3711(g)), DOE is required to transfer all debts over 180 days delinquent to Treasury for purposes of debt collection (*i.e.,* cross-servicing). As part of its regular debt collection procedures, Treasury may use tax refund offset on behalf of DOE.
§ 948.61 Procedure. ( a ) A majority of all members of a committee shall be necessary to constitute a quorum or to pass and motion or approve any committee action.
( b ) Each committee may provide for the members thereof, including the alternate members when acting as members, to vote by mail, telegraph, telephone, or other means of communication, provided that any such vote cast orally shall be confirmed promptly in writing. If any assembled meeting is held all votes shall be cast in person.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 13, 2023

NO. 03

- 22

- 00785

- CV

Texas Tech University System , Appellant

v.

Dolcefino Communications, LLC d/b/a Dolcefino Consulting and San Angelo
Standard

- Times , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 201ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY
BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND THEOFANIS
DISMISSED AS MOOT

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the orde r entered by the tr i a l court . Having reviewed the record, the Court

agrees that the appeal should be dismissed . Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal as moot

.

T he parties shall bear costs relating to this appeal consist ent with their agreement. If t he parties

did no t reach an agreement regarding costs , the parties sh all bear the costs of appeal that

they incurred.
2426.7001-2426.7002 [Reserved]

Parent topic: Subpart 2426.70 - Minority Business Enterprises
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

LARRY CLARK, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06cv705-CSC

) (WO)

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, )

COMMISSIONER OF )

SOCIAL SECURITY, )

)

Defendant. )

FINAL JUDGMENT

In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered in this case, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner be and is

hereby REVERSED and that this case be REMANDED to the Commissioner for further

proceedings consistent with the memorandum opinion.

Done this 15th day of March, 2007.

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00705-CSC Document 19 Filed 03/15/07 Page 1 of 1
Subpart 642.1—Contract Audit Services

Source: 82 FR 58351, Dec. 12, 2017, unless otherwise noted.

Parent topic: PART 642—CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT SERVICES

642.101 Contract audit responsibilities.

(b) The Department has an interagency agreement with the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA)

to perform incurred cost audits on cost-reimbursement contracts. DCAA audits are requested

through the A/LM/AQM/BOD/QA Audit Team.
#### §§ 984.23-984.26 [Reserved]
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Anthony S. Sadowski, Jr., Deceased. Michele Lippa Gartner, Respondent; Joseph A.F. Sadowski, Appellant.

Submitted October 1, 2007;

decided November 27, 2007

Reported below, 2007 NY Slip Op 71127(U), 76500(U).

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order dismissing an appeal from a decision, dismissed upon the ground that no motion for leave to appeal lies from an Appellate Division order dismissing an appeal from a decision *(see*CPLR 5602; *Matter of Mixon v Clark,*3 NY3d 688 [2004]); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying a motion for reconsideration or, in the alternative, leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the *988proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for a stay dismissed as academic.
COURTROOM DEPUTY MINUTES DATE: 9/27/06 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

DIGITAL RECORDING: 11:10 - 11:16 

/ INITIAL APPEARANCE

 DETENTION HEARING 

 REMOVAL HEARING (R.40) 

/ ARRAIGNMENT 

 ARRAIGNMENT on SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT 

 PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION 

PRESIDING MAG. JUDGE VANZETTA PENN MCPHERSON DEPUTY CLERK: WANDA ROBINSON 

CASE NO. 2:06cr209-WKW DEFT. NAME: Bridget Y. Taylor

USA: Susan Redmond ATTY: Samuel Walker 

Type Counsel: ( ) Retained; ( ) Panel CJA; ( ) Waived; (/ ) CDO ;

USPTSO/ USPO: 

Defendant does / does NOT need an interpreter; NAME 

 Kars. Date of Arrest or G karsr40

/ kia. Deft. First Appearance. Advised of rights/charges. Pro/Sup Rel Violator

 Finaff. Financial Affidavit executed  to be obtained by PTS;  ORAL Motion for Appt. Of Counsel. 

 koappted ORAL ORDER appointing Federal Defender - Notice to be filed.

20appt. Panel Attorney Appointed;  to be appointed - prepare voucher

 Deft. Advises he will retain counsel. Has retained 

 Government’ s ORAL (kgoralm.) Motion for Detention Hrg.  To be followed by written motion;

 Government’ sWRITTEN Motion for Detention Hrg. filed. 

 DETENTION HRG  held;  set for ;  Prelim. Hrg  Set for 

 kotempdtn. ORDER OF TEMPORARY DETENTION PENDING HEARING entered

kodtn. ORDER OF DETENTION PENDING TRIAL entered

 kocondrls. Release order entered.  Deft. advised of conditions of release.

kbnd.  BOND EXECUTED (M/D AL charges) $ Deft released (kloc LR)

 BOND EXECUTED (R.40 charges) - deft to report to originating district as ordered

 Loc.(LC) Bond NOT executed. Deft to remain in Marshal’ s custody

 ko. Deft. ORDERED REMOVED to originating district

 kwvprl. Waiver of  Preliminary hearing;  Kwvr40hrg. (Waiver of R.40 Hearing)

 Court findsPROBABLE CAUSE. Defendant bound over to the Grand Jury.

/ Karr. ARRAIGNMENT SET FOR: / HELD. Plea of NOT GUILTY entered. 

 / Trial Term 10/16/06 * ; / PRETRIAL CONFERENCE DATE: 10/13/06 

/ DISCOVERY DISCLOSURES DATE: 9/27/06 

 Krmknn. NOTICEto retained Criminal Defense Attorney handed to Counsel

 krmvhrg. Identity/Removal Hearing set for _______________________________

 Kwvspt Waiver of Speedy Trial Act Rights Executed. 

*Defendant refused to sign a waiver of speedy trial

Case 2:06-cr-00209-MHT-CSC Document 15 Filed 09/27/2006 Page 1 of 1
2907.300 Availability of inventory.

The Department of Labor's FAIR Act inventory of commercial activities performed by federal

employees and inherently governmental functions may be accessed on the Internet at: www.dol.gov

under “Doing Business with DOL”.

Parent topic: Subpart 2907.3 - Contractor Versus Government Performance
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
  (1)
    
    the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Periodic
Report) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Patriot Coal Corporation.
  /s/ Mark N. SchroederMark N. SchroederChief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0386

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

RYAN MITCHELL TUFF,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including May 8, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 29 2023

03/29/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0386
SUBCHAPTER H—CLAUSES AND FORMS

PART 3452—SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES

PART 3452—SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES

Subpart 3452.2—Text of Provisions and Clauses

3452.201-70 Contracting Officer's Representative (COR).

3452.202-1 Definitions—Department of Education.

3452.204-70 Records management.

3452.204-71 Contractor security vetting requirements.

3452.208-72 Paperwork Reduction Act.

3452.209-70 Conflict of interest certification.

3452.209-71 Conflict of interest.

3452.215-70 Release of restricted data.

3452.216-70 Additional cost principles.

3452.216-71 Award-Term.

3452.224-70 Release of information under the Freedom of Information Act.

3452.224-71 Notice about research activities involving human subjects.

3452.224-72 Research activities involving human subjects.

3452.224-73 Protection of student privacy in compliance with FERPA.

3452.227-70 Publication and publicity.

3452.227-71 Advertising of awards.

3452.227-72 Use and non-disclosure agreement.

3452.227-73 Limitations on the use or disclosure of Government-furnished

information marked with restrictive legends.

3452.228-70 Required insurance.

3452.231-71 Invitational travel costs.

3452.232-70 Limitation of cost or funds.

3452.232-71 Incremental funding.

3452.232-72 Limitation of Government's obligation.

3452.233-70 Agency level protests.

3452.237-70 Services of consultants.

3452.237-71 Observance of administrative closures.

3452.239-70 Internet protocol version 6 (IPv6).

3452.239-71 Department information security and privacy requirements.

3452.242-70 Litigation and claims.

3452.242-71 Notice to the Government of delays.

3452.242-73 Accessibility of meetings, conferences, and seminars to persons with

disabilities.

3452.243-70 Key personnel.

3452.247-70 Foreign travel.
Case 2:06-cr-00196-MHT-CSC Document 8 Filed 08/30/2006 Page 1 of 1
Subpart 3011.1—Selecting and Developing

Requirements Documents

Parent topic: PART 3011—DESCRIBING AGENCY NEEDS

3011.103 Market acceptance.

(a) Contracting officers may act on behalf of the head of the agency in this subpart only. Contracting

officers may, under appropriate circumstances, require offerors to make the required

demonstrations.
2429.101 Resolving tax problems.

In order to have uniformity in HUD's treatment of the tax aspects of contracting and ensure effective

cooperation with other Government agencies on tax matters of mutual interest, the Office of General

Counsel has the responsibility within HUD for handling all those tax problems. Therefore, the

contracting activity will not engage in negotiation with any taxing authority for the purpose of

determining the validity or applicability of, or obtaining exemptions from or refund of, any tax. When

a problem exists, the Contracting Officer shall request, in writing, the assistance of legal counsel.

The request shall detail the problem and be accompanied by appropriate backup data. Counsel shall

report to the Contracting Officer as to the necessary disposition of the tax problem. The Contracting

Officer will notify the contractor of the outcome of the tax problem. Counsel is responsible for

communications with the Department of Justice for representation or intervention in proceedings

concerning taxes.

Parent topic: Subpart 2429.1 - General
H. Res. 258

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

May 5, 2005.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany

the bill (H.R. 1268) making Emergency Supplemental Appropriations for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Tsunami Relief, for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2005,

and for other purposes. All points of order against the conference report and against its consideration are waived. The

conference report shall be considered as read.

SEC. 2. The Chairman of the Committee on the Judiciary is authorized, on behalf of the Committee, to file a supplemental report to accompany H.R. 748.

Attest:

Clerk.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

MAY 10, 2007

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 05-16887

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 04-00043-CR-OC-10-GRJ

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

RANDALL SCOTT KIMBRELL, 

a.k.a. Mystiick, 

a.k.a. Grim9, 

a.k.a. Xeoxan, 

a.k.a. Alphalycaon, 

a.k.a. Shade, 

a.k.a. Lycaonshade, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(May 10, 2007)
2

Before ANDERSON, WILSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Thomas H. Ostrander, Esq., appointed counsel for Randall Scott Kimbrell,

has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our

independent review of the entire record reveals counsel’s assessment of the relative

merit of the appeal is correct. Independent examination of the entire record reveals

no arguable issues of merit, therefore, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Kimbrell’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
IV 

House Calendar No. 238 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1045 

[Report No. 109–690] 

Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2006 

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered 

to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules. 

1 Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time 

2 through the legislative day of September 29, 2006, for the 

3 Speaker to entertain motions that the House suspend the 

4 rules. The Speaker or his designee shall consult with the 

5 Minority Leader or her designee on the designation of any 

6 matter for consideration pursuant to this resolution. 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 238 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1045 

[Report No. 109

–690] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of motions to suspend 

the rules. 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2006 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS
H. Res. 15

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

October 6, 2005.

Whereas college and university campuses are subject to criminal threats both from within and outside their borders; 

Whereas under the Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act a total of 

86 homicides, 7,648 sex offenses, 9,649 aggravated assaults, and 3,590 arsons were reported on-campus from 

2000 to 2002; 

Whereas between one fifth and one quarter of female students become the victim of a completed or attempted 

rape, usually by someone they know, during their college 

careers; 

Whereas each year more than 70,000 students between the 

ages of 18 and 24 are victims of alcohol-related sexual 

assault; 

Whereas each year more than 600,000 students between the 

ages of 18 and 24 are assaulted by another student who 

has been drinking; 

Whereas 1,400 college students between the ages of 18 and 

24 die each year from alcohol-related unintentional injuries, including motor vehicle crashes; 

Whereas each year there is approximately $2.8 million worth 

of property damage from fires on-campus; 
2

•HRES 15 EH 

Whereas Security On Campus, Inc., a national group dedicated to promoting safety and security on college and 

university campuses, has designated September as National Campus Safety Awareness Month; and 

Whereas the designation of National Campus Safety Awareness Month provides an opportunity for colleges and universities to inform students about existing campus crime 

trends, campus security policies, crime prevention techniques, fire safety, and alcohol and other drug education, 

prevention, and treatment programs: Now, therefore, be 

it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

the goals and ideals of National Campus Safety Awareness 

Month.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### § 12.101 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to state the regulatory requirements for award of attorney fees to eligible individuals and entities in certain administrative proceedings before the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, in implementation of the Equal Access to Justice Act, 5 U.S.C. 504 (EAJA), which provides for the award of attorney fees and other expenses to parties to “adversary adjudications”, as defined in 5 U.S.C. 504(b)(1)(C). In general, an “adversary adjudication” is an adjudication that is required by statute to be determined on the record after opportunity for hearing before an agency of the United States and in which the position of the agency, or any component of the agency, is presented by an attorney or other representative who enters an appearance and participates in the proceeding. However, some agency adjudications are expressly excluded from coverage by 5 U.S.C. 504 (e.g., an adjudication for the purpose of granting or renewing a license) even though they fall within this general definition, and certain appeals before an agency board of contract appeals and Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act hearings conducted under 31 U.S.C. ch. 38 are expressly covered.

An eligible party may receive an award in an adversary adjudication when the party prevails over the Commission, unless the Commission's position was substantially justified or special circumstances make an award unjust. The regulations in this part describe the parties eligible for awards and the proceedings that are covered. They also explain how to apply for awards, and the procedures and standards that the Commission will use to make them.
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 24 Filed 01/10/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 24 Filed 01/10/2007 Page 2 of 2
IV 

House Calendar No. 248 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1099 

[Report No. 109–722] 

Relating to consideration of the bill (H.R. 6111) to amend the Internal 

Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the Tax Court may review claims 

for equitable innocent spouse relief and to suspend the running on 

the period of limitations while such claims are pending. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 7, 2006 

Mr. GINGREY, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Relating to consideration of the bill (H.R. 6111) to amend 

the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the 

Tax Court may review claims for equitable innocent 

spouse relief and to suspend the running on the period 

of limitations while such claims are pending. 

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order to take from the Speaker’s table the 

3 bill (H.R. 6111) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 

4 1986 to provide that the Tax Court may review claims 

5 for equitable innocent spouse relief and to suspend the 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS
2 

HRES 1099 RH 

1 running on the period of limitations while such claims are 

2 pending, with the Senate amendment thereto, and to con3 sider in the House, without intervention of any point of 

4 order, a motion offered by the chairman of the Committee 

5 on Ways and Means or his designee that the House concur 

6 in the Senate amendment with the amendment printed in 

7 the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this 

8 resolution. The Senate amendment and the motion shall 

9 be considered as read. The motion shall be debatable for 

10 one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman 

11 and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways 

12 and Means. The previous question shall be considered as 

13 ordered on the motion to its adoption without intervening 

14 motion except one motion to amend, which shall be sepa15 rately debatable for five minutes by the proponent and five 

16 minutes by an opponent. 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS

jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 248 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1099 

[Report No. 109

–722] 

RESOLUTION 

Relating to consideration of the bill (H.R. 6111) to 

such claims are pending. the running on the period of limitations while equitable innocent spouse relief and to suspend provide that the Tax Court may review claims for amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 

DECEMBER 7, 2006 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS