alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 165 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Standards of Official 

Conduct in the One Hundred Ninth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 16, 2005 

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

Standards of Official Conduct in the One Hundred Ninth 

Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Standards of 

4 Official Conduct (hereafter in this resolution referred to 

5 as the ‘‘Committee’’), including the expenses of all staff 

6 salaries, there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts 

7 of the House of Representatives for committee salaries 

8 and expenses, not more than $4,768,734 for the One Hun9 dred Ninth Congress. 
2 

•HRES 165 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $2,300,779 shall be available 

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

5 noon on January 3, 2005, and ending immediately 

6 before noon on January 3, 2006; and 

7 (2) not more than $2,467,955 shall be available 

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

9 noon on January 3, 2006, and ending immediately 

10 before noon on January 3, 2007. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ
Subpart 2953.1 - General

Parent topic: PART 2953 - FORMS

2953.100 Request for Recommendation by Procurement

Review Board DL 1-490.

The following form must be used by the requisitioning office to submit a request for review by the

Procurement Review Board as specified in DOLAR 2901 and 2943. This form must be submitted

through the Assistant Secretary for the program office to the Director, Division of Acquisition

Management Services, for scheduling before the Procurement Review Board.








2953.101 Simplified Acquisition Documentation Checklist

DL 1-2216.

The following checklist must be used to document all simplified acquisitions at or below the

simplified acquisition threshold.
2953.102 Quotation for Simplified Acquisitions DL 1-2078.

The following form must be used to document all simplified acquisitions above the micro-purchase

threshold and below the simplified acquisition threshold. This form may also be used to document

commercial acquisitions on a fixed price basis up to $5 million.
2953.103 Acquisition Screening and Review - over $100,000

DL 1-2004.

The requiring organization must complete the following form for all acquisitions above the simplified

acquisition threshold. This form will then be submitted through the contracting officer to the Office

of Small Business Programs for review.
1622.103-70 Contract clause.       The clause at 1652.222–70 shall be inserted in all FEHBP contracts.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1622.1—Basic Labor Policies
Case 2:06-cr-00196-MHT-CSC Document 6 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Lt3RA P. HACf(ETT. CLr

US DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT 4:LA

Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ' '

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA V V L,

NORTHERN DIVISION

2009 AUG III A fØ: JI

-vs. - CR 4fi4cOW4 rOUOI

EUGENE L. CLECKLER

Defendant

REPLY TO THE UNITED STATES'S RESPONSE TO

DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUSPEND EXECUTION OF FORFEITURE

Comes now the Defendant, Eugene L. Cleckler, pro Se, and respectfully submits his reply

to the United States's letter response to his motion to suspend execution of forfeiture.

Specifically, Defendant states the following:

I. On July 18, 2008, the United States agreed by letter to suspend execution of

forfeiture for six (6) months providing that the Defendant increase his BOP

payments to $1,000.00 each month.

2. Respectfully, such a payment is impossible for the Defendant while he is

incarcerated and, in fact, would require a new Judgment to be entered.

3. As such, the Defendant asks the Court to grant his motion for the reasons

previously presented, and to hold the matter in abeyance for six (6) months, or

Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 131 Filed 08/14/2008 Page 1 of 2
until he can sell his property, whichever comes first.

Respectfully Submitted on this, the I / day of August, 2008.

c4, ,71

Eugene L. Cleckler

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Eugene L. Cleckler, hereby certify under the penalty of perjury that a true and accurate

copy of the foregoing has been sent, via 1St Class U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, to the Office of the

U.S. Attorney; 131 Clayton Street; P.O. Box 197; Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3429, by

depositing the same in the institutional mailing system at LSCI Butner, NC on this, the ____ day

of August, 2008.

Eugene L. Cleckler

# 12009-002

LSCI Butner

P.O. Box 999

Butner, NC 27509

2

Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 131 Filed 08/14/2008 Page 2 of 2
#### Imelda REYES-SALAZAR, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-75991.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 13, 2007.*

Filed Aug. 22, 2007.

Hiram W. Kwan, Esq., Law Office of Hiram W. Kwan, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

*431CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Richard M. Evans, Esq., Marion E. Guy-ton, Esq., DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: KLEINFELD, SILVERMAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Imelda Reyes-Salazar, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the denial of motions to reopen for abuse of discretion and we review due process challenges de novo. *Rodriguez-Lariz v. INS,*282 F.3d 1218, 1222 (9th Cir.2002). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not violate Reyes-Salazar’s due process rights or abuse its discretion when it denied her motion to reopen. The BIA correctly determined that Reyes-Salazar was not eligible for repapering because she was served with a Notice to Appear on November 4, 1997, and thus, already in removal proceedings. *See, e.g., Alcaraz v. INS,*384 F.3d 1150, 1154 n. 1 (9th Cir.2004) (“eligibility for repapering is conditioned on aliens being disadvantaged by the retroactive stop-time rule.”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### § 140.8 Specific exemptions.

The Commission may, upon application of any interested person or upon its own initiative, grant such exemptions from the requirements of the regulations in this part as it determines are authorized by law and are otherwise in the public interest.

[34 FR 19546, Dec. 11, 1969]
#### KELLOGG v. WILNER CONST. CO. et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

May 29, 1914.)

Action by Rawdon W. Kellogg against the Wilner Construclion Company and others.

PER CURIAM.

Order of the County Court of Queens County affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. See Colwell Lead Co. v. Home Title Ins. Co., 154 App. Div. 83, 138 N. Y. Supp. 738, affirmed 208 N. Y. 591, 102 N. E. 1100; Astor Mortgage Co. v. Milton Construction Co., 151 App. Div. 557, 136 N. Y. Supp. 82; Barwin Realty Co. v. Union Stove Works, 146 App. Div. 319, 130 N. Y. Supp. 781; Herzog v. Mark, 202 N. Y. 1, 94 N. E. 1063, 35 L. R. A. (N. S.) 976. Rehearing denied, 148 N. Y. Supp. 1124. See, also, 147 N. Y. Supp. 1120.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

OWEN J. ROGAL, D.D.S., P.C., 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

SKILSTAF, INC., 

 Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CIVIL ACTION NO. 

3:06-cv-00711-MHT

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, Skilstaf, Inc. 

(“Skilstaf”) identifies SkilStaf International, Inc. as its parent company. 

Respectfully Submitted, 

 s/Charles A. Stewart III 

Charles A. Stewart III (STE067) 

Bradley Arant Rose & White LLP

The Alabama Center for Commerce 

401 Adams Avenue, Suite 780 

Montgomery, AL 36104 

Telephone: (334) 956-7700 

Facsimile: (334) 956-7701 

cstewart@bradleyarant.com

Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 25 Filed 10/10/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

 s/Amelia T. Driscoll 

Amelia T. Driscoll (DRI016) 

Bradley Arant Rose & White LLP

1819 Fifth Avenue North 

Birmingham, AL 35203-2104 

Telephone: (205) 521-8000 

Facsimile: (205) 521-8800 

adriscoll@bradleyarant.com

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 Skilstaf, Inc. 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on October 10th, 2006, I electronically filed the 

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will 

send notification of such filing to the following: 

Robert E. Cole 

437 Chestnut Street, Suite 218 

Philadelphia, PA 19109 

Beth A. Friel 

Jeanne L. Bakker 

Mongtomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads 

123 South Broad Street 

Philadelphia, PA 19109 

and I hereby certify that I have mailed by U. S. Postal Service the document 

to the following non-CM/ECF participants: None. 

/s/ Amelia T. Driscoll 

Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 25 Filed 10/10/2006 Page 2 of 2
1615.070 Negotiation authority.

The authority to negotiate FEHB contracts is conferred by 5 U.S.C. 8902.

Parent topic: PART 1615—CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the NCI Special Emphasis Panel, Experimental Therapeutics Program (NExT), January 6, 2011, 8:30 a.m.-4:30 p.m., Doubletree Hotel Bethesda, 8120 Wisconsin Avenue, Rockville, MD 20852 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on November 24, 2010, 75 FR 71712.                

                    This notice is amending the location of the meeting from the Doubletree Hotel Bethesda, 8120 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814 to the                           ( print page 79010)                        Marriott North Conference Center, 5701 Marinelli Road, Rockville, MD 20852. The meeting is closed to the public.                

Dated: December 13, 2010.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-31739 Filed 12-16-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 2.405 Initial decisions in consolidated hearings.

At the conclusion of a hearing held under this subpart, the presiding officer will render a partial initial decision on the common design. The partial initial decision on the common design may be appealed under § 2.341. If the proceedings have also been consolidated with respect to matters other than the common design under § 2.317(b), the presiding officer may issue a consolidated partial initial decision for those proceedings. No construction permit, full-power operating license, or combined license under part 52 of this chapter will be issued until an initial decision has been issued on all phases of the hearing and all issues under the Act and the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 appropriate to the proceeding have been resolved.
§ 966.130 Application. Any person applying for exemption from regulations issued pursuant to § 966.52 shall file such application with the committee, or its duly authorized agent for such purpose, on forms to be furnished by such committee. Each application shall state the name and address of the applicant, the grade, size, and quality regulations from which exemption is requested; and facts demonstrating that the tomatoes, for which exemption is requested, were adversely affected by acts beyond his control or by acts beyond the applicant's reasonable expectation. Applications shall set forth such additional information as the committee may find necessary in making determinations with respect thereto, including, without limitation thereto, the information required on producers' applications by paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section. ( a ) The location and acreage of the farm on which tomatoes for which exemption is requested, the location where such tomatoes are to be prepared for market, and the loading point from which such tomatoes are to be shipped if exemption is granted;
( b ) Quantity (by grade, size, quality, and variety) of tomatoes harvested during the current season or any specific portion thereof prior to the date of application and to be harvested, subsequent to such date, during the remainder of the current season or any specific portion thereof (as may be determined pursuant to this part); an estimate of the portion of such tomatoes which can be handled under regulation issued pursuant to § 966.52, during the remainder of the season; and the reasons why all of such tomatoes cannot be handled under such regulations.
[22 FR 9132, Nov. 16, 1957. Redesignated at 26 FR 12751, Dec. 30, 1961]
```

[House Document 109-130]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

 
 
109th Congress, 2d Session - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 109-130

    CONTINUATION OF A NATIONAL EMERGENCY WITH RESPECT TO THE EXPORT 
                       ADMINISTRATION ACT OF 1979

                               __________

                             COMMUNICATION

                                  from

                   THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

                              transmitting

 A NOTICE OF CONTINUATION OF NATIONAL EMERGENCY BEYOND AUGUST 17, 2006 
DECLARED BY EXECUTIVE ORDER 13222 OF AUGUST 17, 2001, TO DEAL WITH THE 
  THREAT TO THE NATIONAL SECURITY, FOREIGN POLICY, AND ECONOMY OF THE 
 UNITED STATES CAUSED BY THE LAPSE OF THE EXPORT ADMINISTRATION ACT OF 
                  1979, PURSUANT TO 50 U.S.C. 1622(d).

    September 6, 2006.--Referred to the Committee on International 
                  Relations and ordered to be printed
                                           The White House,
                                        Washington, August 3, 2006.
Hon. J. Dennis Hastert,
Speaker of the House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.
    Dear Mr. Speaker: Section 202(d) of the National 
Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), provides for the automatic 
termination of a national emergency unless, prior to the 
anniversary date of its declaration, the President publishes in 
the Federal Register and transmits to the Congress a notice 
stating that the emergency is to continue in effect beyond the 
anniversary date. In accordance with this provision, I have 
sent the enclosed notice, stating that the emergency caused by 
the lapse of the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended, 
is to continue in effect for 1 year beyond August 17, 2006, to 
the Federal Register for publication.
            Sincerely,
                                                    George W. Bush.
                                 Notice

                              ----------                              

     Continuation of Emergency Regarding Export Control Regulations

    On August 17, 2001, consistent with the authority provided 
me under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), I issued Executive Order 13222. In that 
order, I declared a national emergency with respect to the 
unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, 
foreign policy, and economy of the United States in light of 
the expiration of the Export Administration Act of 1979, as 
amended (50 U.S.C. App. 2401 et seq.). Because the Export 
Administration Act has not been renewed by the Congress, the 
national emergency declared on August 17, 2001, must continue 
in effect beyond August 17, 2006. Therefore, in accordance with 
section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 
1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency 
declared in Executive Order 13222.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and 
transmitted to the Congress.

                                                    George W. Bush.
    The White House, August 3, 2006.

                                  

```
###### Editorial Note on Part 1045

#### Editorial Notes:Nomenclature changes to part 1045 appear at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023, and 88 FR 82238, Nov. 24, 2023.

§ 1045.150 Can anyone remove the RD, FRD, or TFNI portions and markings to produce an NSI or unclassified version of the matter?

Editorial Notes:

Nomenclature changes to part 1045 appear at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023, and 88 FR 82238, Nov. 24, 2023.

(a) *Removal of RD, FRD, or TFNI portions from matter containing RD, FRD, or TFNI.* Specific authority is required to remove RD, FRD, or TFNI portions from matter. The authority required depends on whether the matter is intended for public release, the category of information in the matter, and whether the matter is portion marked.

(b) *If the resulting or new matter is intended for public release.* An RD Derivative Classifier or a person trained to classify matter containing TFNI does not have the authority to remove the RD, FRD, or TFNI portions or markings for matter intended for public release. The matter must be submitted in accordance with § 1045.125 to the appropriate agency who will review the matter and remove the RD, FRD, or TFNI portions and markings.

(c) *If the resulting matter is not intended for public release.*

(1) An RD Derivative Classifier may remove the portions marked as containing RD or FRD and remove the RD or FRD markings.

(2) A person trained in accordance with § 1045.120(e) may remove the portions containing TFNI and the TFNI markings.

(3) In all cases under § 1045.150(b) this may be done only if the matter is originated by the authorized person's agency and the matter is portion marked, and the resulting matter is reviewed to ensure it does not contain RD, FRD, or TFNI by a person authorized to review the matter.
SUBCHAPTER C - CONTRACTING METHODS

AND CONTRACT TYPES

PART 413 - SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES

PART 414 - SEALED BIDDING

PART 415 - CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION

PART 416 - TYPES OF CONTRACTS

PART 417 - SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS

PART 418 [RESERVED]

PART 413 - SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES

Subpart 413.3 - Simplified Acquisition Methods

413.301 Governmentwide commercial purchase card.

413.306 SF 44, Purchase Order-Invoice-Voucher.

413.307 Forms.

PART 414 - SEALED BIDDING

Subpart 414.2 - Solicitation of Bids

414.201 Preparation of invitations for bids.

414.201-6 Solicitation provision.

Subpart 414.4 - Opening of Bids and Award of Contract

414.404 Rejection of bids.

414.404-1 Cancellation of invitations after opening.

414.407 Mistakes in bids.

414.407-3 Other mistakes disclosed before award.

414.407-4 Mistakes after award.

414.409 Information to bidders.

414.409-2 Award of classified contracts.

PART 415 - CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION

Subpart 415.2 - Solicitation and Receipt of Proposals and Information

415.204 Contract format.

415.207 Handling proposals and information.

415.209 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.

Subpart 415.3 - Source Selection

415.303 Responsibilities.

415.305 Proposal evaluation.

Subpart 415.4 - Contract Pricing

415.404-4 Profit.

Subpart 415.5 - Preaward, Award, and Postaward Notifications, Protests and Mistakes

415.570 Post-award conference.

Subpart 415.6 - Unsolicited Proposals

415.604 Agency points of contact.

415.606 Agency procedures.

PART 416 - TYPES OF CONTRACTS

416.000 Scope of part.

Subpart 416.2 - Fixed-Price Contracts

416.203 Fixed-price contracts with economic price adjustment.

416.203-4 Contract clauses.

Subpart 416.4 - Incentive Contracts
416.405 Cost-reimbursement incentive contracts.

416.405-2 Cost-plus-award-fee contracts.

416.406 Contract clauses.

416.470 Solicitation provision.

Subpart 416.5 - Indefinite-Delivery Contracts

416.505 Ordering.

416.506 Solicitation provision and contract clauses.

Subpart 416.6 - Time-and-Materials, Labor-Hour, and Letter Contracts

416.603 Letter contracts.

416.603-2 Application.

416.603-4 Contract clauses.

416.670 Contract clauses.

Subpart 416.7 - Agreements

416.702 Basic agreements.

PART 417 - SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS

Subpart 417.2 - Options

417.204 Contracts.

PART 418 [RESERVED]
Case 1:06-cr-00197-MEF-CSC Document 37 Filed 01/10/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cr-00197-MEF-CSC Document 37 Filed 01/10/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Phyllis Cavalera, Appellant.

Judgment of conviction rendered December 11, 1968 on defendant’s plea of guilty of unlawfully possessing a depressant and stimulant drug as a misdemeanor, and certifying defendant on her admission of addiction to the Narcotic Addiction Control Commission for a period not to exceed 36 months,K unanimously reversed on the law, and on the consent of the District Attorney, and the defendant remanded for resentenee. The defendant was sentenced under section 208 of the Mental Hygiene Law providing for an examination under section 207 thereof, which by its provision is applicable to violations committed after April 1, 1967. It appears that defendant’s violation was committed prior thereto. Accordingly, the certification of defendant to Narcotic Addiction Control Commission was unauthorized. Concur — Capozzoli, J. P., Nunez, McNally, Steuer and Tilzer, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Bryan Miller, Appellant.

[813 NYS2d 662]

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Orange County (Rosenwasser, J.), imposed February 20, 2003, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed. No opinion. Prudenti, P.J., Florio, Santucci, Skelos and Dillon, JJ., concur.
#### § 1015.400 Scope.

The subpart sets forth the standards for terminating collection activity. This subpart corresponds to 31 CFR part 903 of the Treasury Federal Claims Collection Standards.
157 So.2d 234

#### Succession of Thomas Charles MULQUEENY.

No. 46992.

Nov. 12, 1963.

In re: Miss Dorothy Blackmar et al. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 156 So.2d 317.

The application is denied. There appears no error of law in the judgment complained of.