alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Subpart 917.6 - Management and Operating Contracts    **Parent topic:** PART 917 - SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS917.600 Scope of subpart.       (a) This subpart implements 48 CFR subpart 17.6, Management and Operating Contracts. Departmental policies, procedures, provisions and clauses to be used in the award and administration of management and operating contracts that either implement or supplement the Federal Acquisition Regulation and parts 901 through 952 of this chapter are contained in part 970.          (b) The requirements of this subpart apply to any Department of Energy management and operating contract, including performance-based management contracts as defined in 917.601. References in this subpart to “management and operating contracts” include performance-based management contracts.917.601 Definitions.       *Performance-based contracting* has the meaning contained in 48 CFR 37.101.          *Performance-based management contract* means a management and operating contract that employs, to the maximum extent practicable, performance-based contracting concepts and methodologies through the application of results-oriented statements of work; clear objective performance standards and measurement tools; and incentives to encourage superior contractor performance.917.602 Policy.       (a) The use of a management and operating contract must be authorized by the Secretary.          (b) It is the policy of the Department of Energy to provide for full and open competition in the award of management and operating contracts, including performance-based management contracts.          (c) A management and operating contract may be awarded or extended at the completion of its term without providing for full and open competition only when such award or extension is justified under one of the statutory authorities identified in 48 CFR 6.302 and only when authorized by the Secretary. Documentation and processing requirements for justifications for the use of other than full and open competition shall be accomplished in accordance with internal agency procedures
#### § 1040.113 Deferral.

DOE may defer action on pending applications for assistance in such a case during pendency of administrative proceedings under § 1040.114 of this subpart.
Subpart 3042.15—Contractor Performance

Information

Parent topic: PART 3042—CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT SERVICES

3042.1502 Policy.

(a) Components shall use the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) or

other performance reporting system as designated by the DHS Chief Procurement Officer for

evaluating contractor performance in accordance with (FAR) 48 CFR sections 42.1502 and 42.1503.

(e) Components shall use the Construction Contractor Appraisal Support System (CCASS) module of

CPARS, or other performance reporting system as designated by the DHS Chief Procurement Officer

for evaluating construction contractor performance in accordance with (FAR) 48 CFR sections

42.1502 and 42.1503.

(f) Components shall use the Architect-Engineer Contract Administration Support System (ACASS)

module of CPARS or other performance reporting system as designated by the DHS Chief

Procurement Officer for evaluating architect-engineer contractor performance in accordance with

(FAR) 48 CFR sections 42.1502 and 42.1503.
From:

Sent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:

IFCCadmin <admin@islandfamily.o.rg>

Wednesday, October 30, 2013 3:37 PM

EAS(OST)

EAS(OST); admin@islandfamily.org

Makani Kai

Faulk. Scott (OSn

To Whom It May Concern:

We are writing with regards to Makani Kai. They have been our airline of choice for the

past 2 years. They are a very good company, our group flies to Kalaupapa several times a

year, and their prices and service have been affordable for the local people. Other airlines

have higher prices to fly into Kalaupapa and the service is not as good .. We hope they will

be the carrier of choice for those flying into Kalaupapa, as they are our number one airline.

We support Makani Kai and all agree that this is a needed and necessary service provider.

Mahalo KeAkua! Imua

Pamela M. Garza

Dr. Armando K. Garza

Elroy N. Kaniho

Dr. Mitchell C. Eli

Eleanor A. Eli

Janet B. Eli

Desiree D.N. Eli

Pastor Ken Humphries

William Akiona

Marjorie K. Garza

Lael K. Garza

Armando I. Garza

1
Tiffany L.Garza

Juanita K. Mayeda

Glenn D. Mayeda

2
To: Department of Transportation 

From: Robert Geesey 

Date: lith November 2013 

Re: Comment for Rulemaking FAA-2013-0902 1 '."-:'.~i ~ C1 . . ' ~ 

I'm am a private citizen who feels that-airline travel already being a cramped and 

Geesey 

hellish experience--matters ought not become worse by potentially allowing 300 people to crash 

due to a lack of Airbus certification simply so manufacturers can expedite novelties. 

Certification for any Airbus seems appropriate in regards to a common carrier, but especially so 

when a model is trying something new and untested while harboring so many souls. Thus I 

support this rulemaking and hope the agency implements FAA-2013-0902 it in its entirety.
Order entered May 14, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00178-CR

JEFFREY KING, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 9

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 10-13223

ORDER

Appellant’s May 9, 2013 motion for a second extension of time to file appellant’s brief is 

GRANTED. The time to file appellant’s brief is EXTENDED to THIRTY DAYS from the 

date of this order. The Court will not grant any further extensions. If appellant does not file his 

brief within the extended time period, the appeal will be abated for a hearing in the trial court. 

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
IV 

House Calendar No. 17 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 182 

[Report No. 109–28] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 686) for the relief of the parents 

of Theresa Marie Schiavo. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 21 (legislative day of MARCH 20), 2005 

Mr. GINGREY from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 686) for the relief 

of the parents of Theresa Marie Schiavo. 

1 Resolved, That immediately upon the adoption of this 

2 resolution it shall be in order without intervention of any 

3 point of order to consider in the House the bill (S. 686) 

4 for the relief of the parents of Theresa Marie Schiavo. The 

5 bill shall be considered as read. The previous question 

6 shall be considered as ordered on the bill to final passage 

7 without intervening motion except: (1) ten minutes of de8 bate on the bill equally divided and controlled by the chair-
2 

HRES 182 RH 

1 man and ranking minority member of the Committee on 

2 the Judiciary; and (2) one motion to commit. 

House Calendar No. 17 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 182 

[Report No. 109–28] 

RESOLUTION 

the relief of the parents of Theresa Marie Schiavo. 

Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 686) for 

MARCH 21 (legislative day, MARCH 20), 2005 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 242 (Friday, December 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 79024]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31598]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Cooperative Research Group on High-Efficiency 
Dilute Gasoline Engine II

    Notice is hereby given, on November 4, 2010, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Southwest Research Institute--
Cooperative Research Group on High-Efficiency Dilute Gasoline Engine II 
(``HEDGE II'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in 
its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Toyota Motor Corporation, Shizuoka, JAPAN, has been added 
as a party to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and HEDGE II intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On February 19, 2009, HEDGE II filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on April 2, 2009 (74 FR 15003).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on September 1, 
2010. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on October 12, 2010 (75 FR 62569).

Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2010-31598 Filed 12-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### American Express Company v United States Lines, Inc., et al.

Motions, insofar as they seek reargument, denied and, insofar as they seek leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted and the following question certified: "Was the order of this court, which modified the order of the Supreme Court entered October 30, 1978 and reversed an order and judg*619ment of said court entered on October 30, 1978 and November 22, 1978, respectively, properly made?” Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ross, Lupiano, Silver-man and Bloom, JJ.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Integra Bank Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Donald
J. Spring, Senior Vice President and Controller (and in those capacities, acting
as Chief Financial Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




/s/ Donald J. Spring
--------------------
Senior Vice President and Controller
(acting Chief Financial Officer)
August 14, 2002
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Attached files include redacted version of withheld confidential information. Withheld document contains privileged and confidential trade secrets and commercial or financial information which is exempt from disclosure under 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4).
Exhibit No. 32.1
 8888 Acquisition Corp.
 File No. 0-52251
 Form 10-K
 August 31, 2010
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of 8888 Acquisition Corp. (the ACompany@) on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the AReport@), I, Glenn A. Little, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: October 14, 2010
By:
/s/ Glenn A. LittleGlenn A. LittleChief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to 8888 Acquisition Corp. and will be retained by 8888 Acquisition Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 34 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 34 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 34 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 3 of 3
# Subpart 1539.1 - Commercial Supplier Agreements

**Parent topic:**PART 1539 - ACQUISITION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
# Subpart 1311.1 - Selecting and Developing Requirements Documents

**Parent topic:**PART 1311 - DESCRIBING AGENCY NEEDS

## 1311.103 Market acceptance.

The designee authorized as the head of the agency is set forth in CAM 1301.70.
2005.502 Authority.

Before placing paid advertisements in newspapers and trade journals to publicize contract actions,

written authority must be obtained from the Director, Division of Contracts and Property

Management, for Headquarters activities, or the Director, Division of Resource Management and

Administration, within each regional office for a regional procurement.

Parent topic: Subpart 2005.5 - Paid Advertisements
**EXHIBIT
32.1**
  **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Greene County Bancshares,
Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the
“Report”), I, R. Stan Puckett, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
  /s/ R. Stan
  PuckettR. Stan PuckettChairman of the Board and Chief
      Executive OfficerDate: May 5, 2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Air Force

# ACTION:

Notice of Availability (NOA) of a Record of Decision (ROD).

# SUMMARY:

                        On November 18, 2010, the United States Air Force signed the ROD for the 158th Fighter Wing's Proposed Realignment of National Guard Avenue and New Main Gate Construction, Vermont Air National Guard, Burlington International Airport, South Burlington, Vermont. The ROD states the Air Force decision to implement the preferred alternative (Alternative 1—-Realignment                               ( print page 78979)                            of a portion of National Guard Avenue to meet recommended stand-off distance between perimeter fence and mission critical resources and personnel).                    

                        The decision was based on matters discussed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Proposed Realignment of National Guard Avenue and New Main Gate Construction, inputs from the public and regulatory agencies, and other relevant factors. The Final EIS was made available to the public on August 13, 2010 through a NOA in the                         **Federal Register**                         (Volume 75, Number 156, Page 49487) with a wait period that ended on September 14, 2010. The ROD documents only the decision of the Air Force with respect to the proposed Air Force actions analyzed in the Final EIS. Authority: This NOA is published pursuant to the regulations (40 CFR Part 1506.6) implementing the provisions of the NEPA of 1969 (42 USC. 4321,                         *et seq.*) and the Air Force's Environmental Impact Analysis Process (EIAP) (32 CFR Parts 989.21(b) and 989.24(b)(7)).                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mr. Robert Dogan, NGB/A7AM, Conaway Hall, 3500 Fetchet Avenue, JB Andrews, MD 20762-5157                         *e-mail: robert.dogan@ang.af.mil.*

Bao-Anh Trinh,

Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2010-31669 Filed 12-16-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-P
§ 959.26 Selection. The Secretary shall select members and respective alternates from districts established pursuant to § 959.24 or § 959.25. Selections shall be as follows: ( a ) *District No. 1.* Five producer members and alternates; three handler members and alternates.
( b ) *District No. 2.* Three producer members and alternates; two handler members and alternates.
[84 FR 10667, Mar. 22, 2019]
Dismissed and Opinion Filed July 21, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-11-01545-CV

BROYHILL FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, Appellant

V.

RANDY MURPHY AND DAVE SHAFFER, Appellees

On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 08-13276

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Myers, Partida-Kipness, and Garcia

Opinion by Justice Partida-Kipness

We reinstate this appeal. In 2013, we abated this case due to Broyhill Furniture 

Industries’ bankruptcy. See TEX.R. APP. P. 8.2. The Court conducted an independent 

review of the federal Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) system,

which does not show a pending bankruptcy case associated with this appeal.

We notified the parties by letter, requesting they inform the Court of the status 

of the bankruptcy and of this appeal. We cautioned that the failure to respond would 

result in the appeal being dismissed for want of prosecution. See id. 42.3(b),(c). To 

date, neither party has responded.
–2–

Because we gave the parties an opportunity to show why we should not 

dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution and no one responded, we dismiss this 

appeal. See id. 42.3(b),(c); Brewer v. Admiral Ins. Co., 2002 WL 31312990, at *1 

(Tex. App.—Dallas Oct. 16, 2002, no writ) (per curiam) (not designated for 

publication).

111545f.p05

/Robbie Partida-Kipness/

ROBBIE PARTIDA-KIPNESS

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

BROYHILL FURNITURE 

INDUSTRIES, Appellant

No. 05-11-01545-CV V.

RANDY MURPHY AND DAVE 

SHAFFER, Appellees

On Appeal from the 44th Judicial 

District Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 08-13276.

Opinion delivered by Justice PartidaKipness. Justices Myers and Garcia 

participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is 

DISMISSED.

Judgment entered this 21st day of July, 2021.
Case 2:06-cv-00720-WHA-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cr-202-WKW

 ) (WO)

EUGENE CLECKLER )

KIM CLECKLER )

ORDER

After an independent and de novo review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and

DECREE of the court that:

(1) Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the court construes the document

entitled “Appeal of Defendant Eugene Cleckler’s Motion to Dismiss” (Doc. # 55) as

an objection to Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 51);

(2) The objections filed by the defendants (Docs. # 53 & 55) are OVERRULED;

(3) The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge entered on November

20, 2006 (Doc. # 51) is ADOPTED;

(4) The defendants’ motions to dismiss (Docs. # 41 & 43) are DENIED.

DONE this 12th day of December, 2006.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 56 Filed 12/12/2006 Page 1 of 1
3025.7003 Contract clauses.       Unless an exception under (HSAR) 48 CFR 3025.7002–2(a), (b), (e) or (f) applies, insert the clause at (HSAR) 48 CFR 3052.225–70, Requirement for Use of Certain Domestic Commodities, in solicitations, exercising of an option, contract modifications that add new items (or which make a cardinal change) and contracts with a value exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold when procuring any item covered under (HSAR) 48 CFR 3025.7002–1(a) or (b).    **Parent topic:** Subpart 3025.70—American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Restrictions on Foreign Acquisition
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) CR. NO. 2:06cr200-WHA

)

HECTOR R. SILVA )

ORDER

Pursuant to the defendant’s Notice of Intent to Change Plea (Doc. #76) filed on

November 22, 2006, it is hereby

ORDERED that the defendant’s change of plea hearing be and is hereby set for

December 1, 2006, at 9:00 a.m., in Courtroom 4B, United States Courthouse Complex,

One Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a court reporter for this proceeding. If the defendant

is in custody, the United States Marshal or the person having custody of the defendant shall

produce the defendant for the proceeding.

Done this 27 day of November, 2006. th

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 77 Filed 11/27/2006 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

)

vs. ) CASE NO.: 3:06CR208-MEF

)

JASON EDWARD COFIELD )

)

ORDER

For good cause, it is

ORDERED that the pretrial conference previously scheduled for February 16,

2007 be and is hereby RESET for February 20, 2007 at 1:00 p.m., in courtroom 4B,

Frank M. Johnson, Jr United States Courthouse Complex, One Church Street,

Montgomery, Alabama. 

Done this 14th day of November, 2006.

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cr-00208-MEF-CSC Document 33 Filed 11/14/2006 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) 3:06-CV-00733-MHT-TFM

)

JOSEPH DONALD PRATHER, and )

LINDA PRATHER, )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

Upon of review and consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion for Order on Plaintiff’s

Request for Admissions (Doc. 25, filed May 18, 2007) and Defendants’ Response to Order

to Show Cause (Doc. 27, filed May 24, 2007), it is for good cause

ORDERED Plaintiff’s Motion for Order on Plaintiff’s Request for Admissions (Doc.

25) is DENIED as moot. 

DONE this 24th day of May, 2007.

/s/Terry F. Moorer

TERRY F. MOORER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 28 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### § 987.4 Area of production.

*Area of production* means Riverside County, Calif.

[36 FR 15037, Aug. 12, 1971]