alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.1

                              ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                        TO THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                             INTERVOICE-BRITE, INC.

                           (TO EFFECT NAME CHANGE TO
                               "INTERVOICE, INC.")

         Pursuant to the provisions of Article 4.01 to Article 4.06 of the Texas
Business Corporation Act, the undersigned corporation adopts the following
Articles of Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation:

                                    ARTICLE I

         The name of the corporation is InterVoice-Brite, Inc.

                                   ARTICLE II

         Article I of the Articles of Incorporation of the corporation is
amended to read in its entirety as follows:

                                   "ARTICLE I
                                      NAME

         The name of the corporation is Intervoice, Inc. (the "Corporation")."

                                   ARTICLE III

         These Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation were
adopted by the shareholders of the corporation on August 28, 2002:

                                   ARTICLE IV

         The number of shares of common stock, no par value per share ("Common
Stock") of the Corporation outstanding, and the numbers of shares entitled to
vote on the amendment, is 34,106,944.

                                    ARTICLE V

         The number of shares of Common Stock voted for such amendment was
30,696,678. The number of shares of Common Stock voted against such amendment
was 103,058.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the corporation has executed these Articles of
Amendment as of the 28th day of August, 2002.


                                       INTERVOICE-BRITE, INC.

                                       By: /s/ DEAN C. HOWELL
                                          --------------------------------------
                                       Dean C. Howell,
                                       Executive Vice President and General
                                       Counsel
#### David Merrick, Respondent, v. News Syndicate Co. Inc., Appellant.

— Order entered September 25, 1969, denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously reversed on the law, the motion granted, and the complaint dismissed, with $50 costs and disbursements to appellant. The cartoon claimed to be libelous is not, not even when explained in the strained manner plaintiff has employed, and defendant’s demurrer should have been sustained. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Eager, Capozzoli and Markewich, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 78 FR 34247, June 7, 2013.

§ 1.34 Office of Administration. The Office of Administration— ( a ) Develops and implements agencywide contracting policies and procedures;
( b ) Develops policies and procedures and manages the operation and maintenance of NRC offices, facilities, and equipment;
( c ) Plans, develops, establishes, and administers policies, standards, and procedures for the overall NRC security program; and
( d ) Manages the NRC Management Directives Program and provides translation services.
[63 FR 15741, Apr. 1, 1998, as amended at 70 FR 69422, Nov. 16, 2005; 83 FR 30287, June 28, 2018]
#### § 14.15 Where to present a claim to NRC.

A claimant shall mail or deliver the claim to the office of employment of the NRC employee whose negligent or wrongful act or omission is alleged to have caused the loss or injury. If the office of employment is not known, the claimant shall file the claim with the Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555.

[47 FR 8983, Mar. 3, 1982, as amended at 51 FR 35999, Oct. 8, 1986]
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theaccompanying Quarterly Report of Greene County Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the “Report”),I, R. Stan Puckett, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|                              | /s/ R. Stan  Puckett |                                       |
|-----------------------------------|----------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|                              |                 | R. Stan Puckett                            |
|                              |                 | Chairman of the  Board and Chief Executive |
|                              |                 | Officer                                    |
|                              |                 |                                       |
|                              |                 |                                       |
| Date:  November 7, 2005 |                 |                                       |
|                                   |                      |                                            |  |

 

----
Case 2:06-cv-00712-MEF-CSC Document 4 Filed 08/30/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00712-MEF-CSC Document 4 Filed 08/30/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00712-MEF-CSC Document 4 Filed 08/30/2006 Page 3 of 3
SUBPART 50.1 EXTRAORDINARY CONTRACTUAL ACTIONS     **Parent topic:** PART 50 –– EXTRAORDINARY CONTRACTUAL ACTIONS AND THE SAFETY ACT50.102 Delegation of and limitations on exercise of authority.50.102-2 Contract adjustment boards.    The DISA Contract Adjustment Board shall be composed of the following members:       SPE                   ChairpersonHCA                   Vice Chairperson and MemberGeneral Counsel                   MemberThe Board considers and evaluates requests for contract adjustments and recommends appropriate action to the Director. The findings of the Board are advisory. The HCA shall assume staff and administrative cognizance of contract adjustment matters and supply secretarial and recorder services for the operation of the Board.       A majority constitutes a quorum for any purpose and the concurring vote of a majority of the total board membership constitutes an action of the board. Alternates may be appointed to act in the absence of any member.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION

WILLIE MCNAIR, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, ) 

 ) 

v. ) No. 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC 

 ) 

RICHARD ALLEN, Commissioner, ) 

Alabama Deparment of ) 

Corrections, et al., ) 

 ) 

 Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. ) 

__________________________________ 

JAMES CALLAHAN, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, ) 

 ) 

v. ) No. 2:06-cv-00919-WKW-CSC 

 ) 

RICHARD ALLEN, et al., ) 

 ) 

 Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. ) 

DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO COURT’S ORDER 

ENTERED ON APRIL 30, 2007 

 In response to this Court’s order, see Doc. 55, the State of Alabama has not 

requested execution dates for Willie McNair or James Callahan. However, it is the 

Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 57 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

State of Alabama’s present intention to file such motions by May 15, 2007. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 TROY KING 

 ALABAMA ATTORNEY GENERAL 

 /s/ J. CLAYTON CRENSHAW 

J. CLAYTON CRENSHAW 

 ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

This is to certify that on the 2nd day of May, 2007, a copy of the foregoing 

has been electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, 

which will electronically send a copy of the same to the following: Stephanie L. 

Cohen, Vincent R. Fitzpatrick, Jr., and Heather K. McDevitt.

/s/ J. CLAYTON CRENSHAW 

J. CLAYTON CRENSHAW 

ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL 

OF COUNSEL: 

Office of the Attorney General 

11 South Union Street 

Montgomery, AL 36130 

(334) 242-7423 Office 

(334) 353-3637 Fax 

ccrenshaw@ago.state.al.us 

Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 57 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 2 of 2
Subpart 342.7 - Indirect Cost Rates    **Parent topic:** PART 342 - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION342.705 Final indirect cost rates.       Contract actions for which the Department of Health and Human Services is the cognizant Federal agency:          (a) The Financial Management Services, Division of Cost Allocation, Program Support Center, shall establish facilities and administration costs, also known as indirect cost rates, research patient care rates, and, as necessary, fringe benefits, computer, and other special costing rates for use in contracts awarded to State and local governments, colleges and universities, hospitals, and other nonprofit organizations.          (b) The National Institute of Health, Division of Financial Advisory Services, shall establish indirect cost rates and similar rates for use in contracts awarded to for profit organizations.
1511.000 Scope of part.       This part implements FAR part 11 and provides policy and procedures for describing Agency needs.    **Parent topic:** PART 1511 - DESCRIBING AGENCY NEEDS
#### Mae I. Robinson et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. State of New York, Appellant-Respondent.

(Claim No. 40495.)

—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and facts in accordance with the Memorandum, and as modified affirmed, without costs. Certain findings of fact disapproved and reversed and new findings made. Memorandum: The court’s adoption of claimants’ appraisers’ valuation of $50 a front foot for the undeveloped low lying lakefront property is not sustainable. The highest value on a comparable sale in the record is $28 a front foot paid in 1957 on filled lots served by private access roads constructed by the developer. None of the essential site preparation, development, and road construction has been undertaken here. There is nothing about the Bartell Road frontage which is unique so it must be valued by reference to comparable sales. Giving consideration to such sales a fair valuation of the property fronting on the road would not exceed $10 a front foot. The award should be computed as follows: Bartell Road frontage of 1,675 feet, 200 feet depth, at $10 foot — $16,750; Lake frontage of 346 feet, 250 feet depth, at $20 foot — $6,920; Interior land of 10.786 acres at $1,000 an acre — $10,786; Total Award for direct taking of 20.686 acres — $34,456.' (Appeal and cross appeal from judgment of the Court of Claims for claimants, in an action .for permanent appropriation of realty and temporary easement.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Henry, Del Vecchio and Marsh, JJ.
#### § 945.9 Ship or handle.

*Ship* or *handle* means to pack, sell, consign, transport or in any other way to place potatoes grown in the production area, or cause such potatoes to be placed, in the current of commerce within the production area or between the production area and any point outside thereof, so as to directly burden, obstruct, or affect any such commerce: *Provided,* That the definition of *ship* or *handle* shall not include the transportation of ungraded potatoes within the production area for the purpose of having such potatoes stored or prepared for market, except that the committee may impose safeguards pursuant to § 945.53 with respect to such potatoes.

[60 FR 29726, June 5, 1995]
#### DALLAS CONSOL. ELECTRIC ST. RY. CO. v. GARRISON.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

November 27, 1912.)

No. 2,308.

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Texas; Edward R. Meek, Judge.

W. R. Harris and T. B, McCormick, both of Dallas, Tex., for plaintiffs in error.

Lewis M. Dabney and Murphey W. Townsend, both of Dallas, Tex., for defendant in error.

Before PARDEE and SHELBY, Circuit Judges, and FOSTER, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

A majority of the judges find no reversible error in the rulings on the pleadings and in regard to the admission of evidence. The plea of contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff was properly submitted to the jury, and we find no error in the instructions of the court. *988Whether the damages allowed by the jury were excessive is beyond our province. Erie Railroad Co. v. Winter, 143 U. S. 60-75, 12 Sup. Ct. 356, 36 L. Ed. 71. Judgment affirmed.
#### § 1047.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to set forth Department of Energy (hereinafter “DOE”) policy and procedures on the exercise of arrest authority and use of force by protective force personnel.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 242 (Friday, December 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 79013]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31365]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5375-N-49]


Federal Property Suitable as Facilities To Assist the Homeless

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible 
use to assist the homeless.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Juanita Perry, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 7262, Washington, 
DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and 
speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-
free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 800-927-7588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the December 12, 1988 
court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans 
Administration, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a 
weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus 
Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for 
suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the 
purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been 
determined suitable or unsuitable this week.

    Dated: December 9, 2010.
Mark R. Johnston,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.
[FR Doc. 2010-31365 Filed 12-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
#### § 1022.22 Requests for authorizations or appropriations.

It is DOE policy to indicate in any requests for new authorizations or appropriations transmitted to the Office of Management and Budget, if a proposed action is located in a floodplain or wetland and whether the proposed action is in accord with the requirements of E.O. 11988 and E.O. 11990 and this part.
**EXHIBIT
32.2**
  **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Greene County Bancshares,
Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the
“Report”), I, William F. Richmond, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Assistant Secretary of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:
  (1)
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 ****/s/ William F.
    RichmondWilliam F. RichmondSenior Vice President, Chief
      Financial Officer
      and Assistant SecretaryDate:
      May 5, 2005
#### § 993.21a Proper storage.

*Proper storage* means storage of such character as will maintain prunes in the same condition as when received by a handler, except for normal and natural deterioration and shrinkage.

[30 FR 9798, Aug. 6, 1965]
# Subpart 3007.1—Acquisition Plans

**Parent topic:**PART 3007—ACQUISITION PLANNING

## 3007.106 Additional Requirements for Major Systems.

## 3007.106-70 Limitations on Lead System Integrators.

See (HSAR) 48 CFR 3009.570 for policy applicable to acquisition strategies that consider the use of lead system integrators.
#### § 1704.10 Severability.

If any provision of this part or the application of such provision to any person or circumstances, is held invalid, the remainder of this part or the application of such provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid, shall not be affected thereby.
Exhibit 1060 Malmhagen Amendment to Employment Agreement


		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			February 27, 2018
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Pär O. H. Malmhagen
		

		
			17672 Laurel Park Drive N.
		

		
			Livonia, MI 48152
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Re:  Amendment to Employment Agreement With Respect to Vesting of LTI Awards 
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Dear Pelle,
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Reference is made to the Employment Agreement, dated as of January 19, 2017, between you and Tower Automotive Operations USA I, LLC (the “Employment Agreement”).
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			This is to confirm that, effective the date hereof, Section 4.7 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety, to read as follows:
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			“4.7Accelerated Vesting of Equity and LTI Awards.  Notwithstanding anything in the 2010 Plan or any award agreement issued thereunder to the contrary, all then outstanding awards granted to the Employee pursuant to the 2010 Plan, including equity-based awards, performance awards (payable in cash and/or stock) and awards granted prior to the Effective Date (the “2010 Plan Awards”), shall immediately become fully vested upon the consummation of a Change in Control (as defined below) (assuming, in the case of each performance award, target level performance for the entire performance period (without proration of the amount payable thereto). For purposes of this Agreement, “Change in Control” shall be defined as set forth in Section 2.6 of the 2010 Plan on the Effective Date of this Agreement.”
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Except as provided by this letter, the provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Please acknowledge your agreement with the foregoing by countersigning this letter below and returning it to me.
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Regards,
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			/s/ James C. Gouin
		

		
			James C. Gouin
		

		
			Chief Executive Officer
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Acknowledged and agreed:
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			/s/ Pär O. H. Malmhagen
		

		
			Pär O. H. Malmhagen
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Date: February 27, 2018
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Harvey Richardson, Respondent, v. John T. Deegan, as Warden of Sing Sing Prison, Appellant.

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated October 1, 1969, which directed that the Department of Correction *“*compute good behavior time allowances against the remaining portion of petitioner’s maximum term”, etc. Judgment affirmed, *836without costs. In our opinion, the law in effect at the time of relator’s release and the declaration of his delinquency should control the consequences of his violation of parole *(People ex rel. Kurzynski*v. *Hunt,*250 App. Div. 378, 380). As a general rule, statutes and amendments thereto are accorded prospective effect only, unless a clear expression of a contrary legislative intent is found (cf. *Matter of Mulligan*v. *Murphy,*14 N Y 2d 223, 226; *Kaplan*v. *Kaplan,*31 A D 2d 247). If the purpose of the forfeiture provision added to subdivision 5 of section 803 of the Correction Law is to deter parole violations, it makes no sense to impose that penalty provision for a violation which occurred prior to the amendment (McKinney’s Cons. Laws of N. Y., Book 1, Statutes, § 96). Such retroactive application would expose the amendment to attack as an ex post facto law by exacting a penalty which did not exist at the time of the parole violation and inflicting a greater punishment for the violation than the law affixed to it when it was committed *(People ex rel. Lonschein*[Mencher] v. *Warden of Queens House of Detention for Men,*43 Misc 2d 109, 112-113, affd. 15 N Y 2d 663; *People ex rel. Pincus*v. *Adams,*274 N. Y. 447, 454). Christ, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Munder and Brennan, JJ., concur.
2452.201-70 Coordination of data collection activities.       As prescribed in 2401.106-70, insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts where the contractor is required to collect identical information from ten or more public respondents:                               Coordination of Data Collection Activities (APR 1984)                               If it is established at award or subsequently becomes a contractual requirement to collect identical information from ten or more public respondents, the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520) applies. In that event, the Contractor shall not take any action to solicit information from any of the public respondents until notified in writing by the Contracting Officer that the required Office of Management and Budget (OMB) final clearance was received.                            (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** PART 2452 - SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
1331.205-70 Duplication of effort.

The Department will not pay any costs for work that is duplicative of costs charged against any other

contract, subcontract or Government source. Insert clause 1352.231-71, Duplication of Effort, in all

cost-reimbursement, time and materials, and labor hour solicitations and contracts when applicable.

Parent topic: Subpart 1331.2 - Contracts With Commercial Organizations
#### § 985.73 Proceedings after termination.

Upon termination of the provisions of this part, the Committee shall, for the purpose of liquidating the affairs of the Committee, continue as trustees of all the funds and property then in its possession or under its control, including claims for any funds unpaid or property not delivered at the time of such termination. The said trustees shall (a) continue in such capacity until discharged by the Secretary; (b) from time to time account for all receipts and disbursements and deliver all property on hand, together with all books and records of the Committee and of the trustees, to such persons as the Secretary may direct; and (c) upon the request of the Secretary execute such assignments or other instruments necessary or appropriate to vest in such person full title and right to all of the funds, property, and claims vested in the Committee or the trustees pursuant thereto. Any person to whom funds, property, or claims have been transferred or delivered, pursuant to this section, shall be subject to the same obligation imposed upon the Committee and upon trustees.