alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1707.203 Filing requirements for demands or requests for documents or testimony. You must comply with the following requirements whenever you issue demands or requests to a DNFSB employee for official records, information, or testimony. ( a ) Your request must be in writing and must be submitted to the General Counsel. If you serve a subpoena on DNFSB or a DNFSB employee before submitting a written request and receiving a final determination, DNFSB will oppose the subpoena on grounds that your request was not submitted in accordance with this subpart.
( b ) Your written request must contain the following information: ( 1 ) The caption of the legal proceeding, docket number, and name and address of the court or other authority involved;
( 2 ) A copy of the complaint or equivalent document setting forth the assertions in the case and any other pleading or document necessary to show relevance of the testimony, records, or information you seek from the DNFSB;
( 3 ) A list of categories of records sought, a detailed description of how the information sought is relevant to the issues in the legal proceeding, and a specific description of the substance of the testimony or records sought;
( 4 ) A statement as to how the need for the information outweighs the need to maintain any confidentiality of the information and outweighs the burden on DNFSB to produce the records or provide testimony;
( 5 ) A statement indicating that the information sought is not available from another source, from other persons or entities, or from the testimony of someone other than a DNFSB employee, such as a retained expert;
( 6 ) If testimony is requested, the intended use of the testimony, a general summary of the desired testimony, and a showing that no document could be provided and used in lieu of testimony;
( 7 ) A description of all prior decisions, orders, or pending motions in the case that bear upon the relevance of the requested records or testimony;
( 8 ) The name, address, and telephone number of counsel to each party in the case; and
( 9 ) An estimate of the amount of time that the requester and other parties will require with each DNFSB employee for time spent by the employee to prepare for testimony, in travel, and for attendance in the legal proceeding.
( c ) The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board reserves the right to require additional information to complete your request where appropriate.
( d ) Your request should be submitted at least 45 days before the date that records or testimony is required. Requests submitted in less than 45 days before records or testimony is required must be accompanied by a written explanation stating the reasons for the late request and the reasons for expedited processing.
( e ) Failure to cooperate in good faith to enable the General Counsel to make an informed decision may serve as the basis for a determination not to comply with your request.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 26, 2016

a0718 

# Order

Clerk July 26, 2016

148841

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148841

COA: 319352

Emmet CC: 12

- 003758

- FH

WALTER JEROME DEMARAY,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________________________/

By order of February 3, 2015, the application for leave to appeal the January 16,

2014 order of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in People

v Lockridge (Docket No. 149073). On order of the Court, the case having been decided

on July 29, 2015, 498 Mich 358 (2015), the application is again considered. Pursuant to

MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appe al, we REMAND this case to the

Emmet Circuit Court to determine whether the court would have imposed a materially

different sentence under the sentencing procedure described in Lockridge . On remand,

the trial court shall follow the procedure described in Part VI of our opinion. If the trial

court determines that it would have imposed the same sentence absent the

unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it may reaffirm the original sentence. If,

however, the trial court determines that it would not have imposed the same sentence

absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it shall resentence the defendant.

On remand, the Emmet Circuit Court shall also consider the defendant’s issue regarding

the assessment of a payment to the “Victims Restitution Fund.” In all other respects,

leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions

presented should be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
Subpart 308.4 - Federal Supply Schedules    **Parent topic:** PART 308 - REQUIRED SOURCES OF SUPPLIES AND SERVICES308.405-6 Limited source justification and approval.       (d)          (1)  			As required by Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 8.405-1 or 8.405-2, the responsible program office must provide a written justification for an acquisition under the Federal Supply Service program that restricts the number of schedule contractors or when procuring an item peculiar to one manufacturer.
SUBCHAPTER A - GENERAL

PART 800 [RESERVED]

PART 801 - DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS ACQUISITION REGULATION

SYSTEM

PART 802 - DEFINITIONS OF WORDS AND TERMS

PART 803 - IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF

INTEREST

PART 804 - ADMINISTRATIVE AND INFORMATION MATTERS

PART 800 [RESERVED]

PART 801 - DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS ACQUISITION REGULATION SYSTEM

801.000 Scope of part.

Subpart 801.1 - Purpose, Authority, Issuance

801.101 Purpose.

801.103 Authority.

801.104 Applicability.

801.104-70 Exclusions.

801.106 OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act.

Subpart 801.3 - Agency Acquisition Regulations

801.301 Policy.

801.304 Agency control and compliance procedures.

Subpart 801.4 - Deviations From the FAR

801.403 Individual deviations.

801.404 Class deviations.

Subpart 801.6 - Career Development, Contracting Authority, and Responsibilities

801.601 General.

801.602-3 Ratification of unauthorized commitments.

801.604 Contracting Officer`s Representative (COR).

PART 802 - DEFINITIONS OF WORDS AND TERMS

Subpart 802.1 - Definitions

802.101 Definitions.

PART 803 - IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Subpart 803.1 [Reserved]

Subpart 803.2 - Contractor Gratuities to Government Personnel

803.203 Reporting suspected violations of the Gratuities clause.

803.204 Treatment of violations.

Subparts 803.3 - 803.4 [Reserved]

Subpart 803.5 - Other Improper Business Practices

803.570 Commercial advertising.

803.570-1 Policy.

803.570-2 Contract clause.

Subparts 803.6 - 803.8 [Reserved]

Subpart 803.11 - Preventing Personal Conflicts of Interest for Contractor Employees

Performing Acquisition Functions

803.1103 Procedures.

Subpart 803.70 [Reserved]

PART 804 - ADMINISTRATIVE AND INFORMATION MATTERS

Subpart 804.1 [Reserved]
Subpart 804.13 - Personal Identity Verification

804.1303 Contract clause.

Subpart 804.19 - Basic Safeguarding of Covered Contractor Information Systems

804.1900-70 Scope of this subpart.

804.1902 Applicability.

804.1970 Information security policy - contractor general responsibilities.

804.1903 Contract clause.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gene P. Jones, certify that:

|   
|---
|(1)
|   
|(2)
|   
|(3)
|   
|(4)

|  
|--
|a.
|  
|b.
|  
|c.

|   
|---
|(5)

|  
|--
|a.
|  
|b.

|                     |  |                                                                                   
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 28, 2008 |  | /s/ Gene P. JonesGene P. JonesChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)



---
159 So.2d 287

#### Peter J. CASANO and Maren Ruello v. Rural COOK, Lonnie Cook, Employers’ Liability Assurance Corp., Ltd. and Peerless Insurance Company.

No. 47040.

Jan. 20, 1964.

In re: Peter J. Casano and Maren Ruello applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 157 So.2d 616.

The application is denied. We find no error of law in the judgment complained of.
EXHIBIT 31.1  I, Wenji Song, in my capacity indicated below, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of China Shuangji Cement Ltd. (the Registrant); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusion about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; 5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  Date: April 15, 2008 /s/ Wenji Song Wenji Song, President (as Principal Executive Officer)
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 56 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 56 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 56 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 56 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 56 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 5 of 5
----

**Citizens      Financial Corp.**

**Certification      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley**

**Act      of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

| 1. | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the company for the quarterly period                ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission                on the date hereof (the “report”) fully complies with the requirements of                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | 8/8/07 |   | /s/                Robert J. Schoonover |    |
|--------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------|--------------|
|   |   |   | Robert                J. Schoonover     |
|   |   |   | President                and            |
|   |   |   | Chief                Executive Officer  |

----
Case 2:06-cv-00684-MHT-SRW Document 2 Filed 08/03/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00684-MHT-SRW Document 2 Filed 08/03/2006 Page 2 of 2
§ 15.57 Termination of collection action. ( a ) Before terminating collection activity, the NRC should have pursued all appropriate means of collection and determined, based upon the results of the collection activity, that the debt is uncollectible. Termination of collection activity ceases active collection of the debt. The termination of collection activity does not preclude the NRC from retaining a record of the account for purposes of: ( 1 ) Selling the debt, if the Treasury determines that such sale is in the best interests of the United States;
( 2 ) Pursuing collection at a subsequent date in the event there is a change in the debtor's status or a new collection tool becomes available;
( 3 ) Offsetting against future income or assets not available at the time of termination of collection activity; or
( 4 ) Screening future applicants for prior indebtedness.
( b ) Generally, the NRC will terminate collection activity on a debt that has been discharged in bankruptcy, regardless of the amount. However, the NRC may continue collection activity, subject to the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, for any payments provided under a plan of reorganization.
[67 FR 30323, May 6, 2002]
EXHIBIT 99.2

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                     OF POLLUTION RESEARCH AND CONTROL CORP.

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly annual report on Form 10-QSB (the "Form
10-QSB") for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, of Pollution Research and Control
Corp. (the "Issuer").

I, Michael Collins, the Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer certify that to
the best of my knowledge:

(i) the Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or
78o(d)); and

(ii) the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Issuer.

Dated May 15, 2003.




                              /S/ MICHAEL COLLINS
                              ----------------------------
                              NAME: MICHAEL COLLINS



                                    Page 22
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 28 Filed 01/03/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 28 Filed 01/03/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 28 Filed 01/03/2007 Page 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 1998 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998 
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998 
<CASH>                                             850,706 
<SECURITIES>                                             0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                      263,135 
<ALLOWANCES>                                        16,687 
<INVENTORY>                                         17,008 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,114,307 
<PP&E>                                             137,064 
<DEPRECIATION>                                     148,754 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,873,037 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               38,784 
<BONDS>                                                  0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0 
<PREFERRED>                                              0 
<COMMON>                                           847,083 
<OTHER-SE>                                               0 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,873,037 
<SALES>                                            591,254 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   591,254 
<CGS>                                               29,594 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      974,054 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     625 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (382,800) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (382,800) 
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0 
<CHANGES>                                                0 
<NET-INCOME>                                     (382,800) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (0.02) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.02) 
                                               

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



Citizens Financial Corp.



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley

Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



I,
Robert J. Schoonover, President and Chief Executive Officer of Citizens Financial Corp. (the company) certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



|1. | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|              |  |                         
|------------- |  | ------------------------
|Date: 5/10/05 |  | /s/ Robert J. Schoonover
|              |  | Robert J. Schoonover    
|              |  | President               
|              |  | Chief Executive Officer 



26
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

JAMES KUCZMASKI, etc., )

et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv731-MHT

) (WO) 

US FOODSERVICE, )

)

Defendant. )

JUDGMENT

The court having been informed that this cause is now

settled, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the

court that this lawsuit is dismissed in its entirety with

prejudice, with the parties to bear their own costs and

with leave to the parties, within 45 days, to stipulate

to a different basis for dismissal or to stipulate to the

entry of judgment instead of dismissal, and with leave to

any party to file, within 45 days, a motion to have the

dismissal set aside and the case reinstated or the

Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 38 Filed 07/10/07 Page 1 of 2
settlement enforced, should the settlement not be

consummated.

The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this

document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant

to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

DONE, this the 10th day of July, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 38 Filed 07/10/07 Page 2 of 2
#### ACKERMAN, Respondent, v. STACEY, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

July 7, 1914.)

Action by Schuyler Ackerman, as administrator, etc., against Irving E. Stacey.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. See, also, 157 App. Div. 835, 143 N. Y. Supp. 227.

FOOTE, J., not sitting.
§ 1022.12 Notice of proposed action. ( a ) For a proposed floodplain or wetland action for which an EIS is required, DOE shall use applicable NEPA procedures to provide the opportunity for early public review of the proposed action. A notice of intent to prepare the EIS may be used to satisfy the requirement for DOE to publish a notice of proposed floodplain or wetland action.
( b ) For a proposed floodplain or wetland action for which no EIS is required, DOE shall take appropriate steps to send a notice of proposed floodplain or wetland action to appropriate government agencies (*e.g.,* FEMA regional offices, host and affected States, and tribal and local governments) and to persons or groups known to be interested in or potentially affected by the proposed floodplain or wetland action. DOE also shall distribute the notice in the area where the proposed action is to be located (*e.g.,* by publication in local newspapers, through public service announcements, by posting on- and off-site). In addition, for a proposed floodplain or wetland action that may result in effects of national concern to the floodplain or wetland or both, DOE shall publish the notice in the Federal Register.