alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-35 (d)
(logo)SUN TRUST'
MORTGAGE
CitiMortgage, Inc.
4000 Regent Blvd., 3rd Floor
Irving, TX 75063
Attention: Master Servicing Division


Re: Annual Compliance Statement for BAFC 2006-6

In connection with the loans serviced by SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. (the
"Company") pursuant to the Company's Servicing Agreement(s)/Purchase
and Sale Agreement(s) with Bank of America, National Association and
any applicable Reconstitution Agreement(s) (together, the "Transaction
Agreements"), I, the undersigned offioer, hereby certify the following
as of December 31, 2006:

(i)     The Company conducted a review of its activities during the
immediately preceding calendar year (or applicable portion thereof)
and of its performance under the Transaction Agreements during such
period has been made under my supervision; and

(ii)    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Transaction Agreements
in all material respects throughout such calendar year (or applicable
portion thereof), except that as of January 1, 2006, the Company did
not have procedures for monitoring compliance with requirements as s
pecified in the applicable transaction agreements governing SEC
Regulation AB transactions. To address the absence of such procedures,
 the Company's management has undertaken and completed the following
actions: (a) completed a review of each Transaction Agreement and
identified if there was specific language affecting any of the Servicing
Criteria outlined in Section 1122; (b) to the degree that the
Transaction Agreements required specific procedures related to the
servicing criteria, the Company's Reference Point Library (where all
policies and procedures are maintained) was updated to this effect;
(c) for each pool, a Control Matrix was completed (and is maintained on
a current basis) identifying which Transaction Agreements control each
pool; and (d) established a monthly review process where the Company's
managers review key factors of performance under Transaction Agreements
and respond to a questionnaire indicating compliance with such factors.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I do hereby certify the foregoing as of the date hereof,

/s/John R. Purcell, Jr
John R. Purcell, Jr.
Senior Vice President - Manager, Servicing Division
Date: February 27, 2007

SunTrust Mortgage, Inc, Post Office Box 26149
Richmond, VA 23260-6149 Toll Free 1.800.634.7928 www.suntrustmodgage. com
PART 717—SPECIAL CONTRACTING

METHODS

Authority: Sec. 621, Pub. L. 87–195, 75 Stat. 445, (22 U.S.C. 2381) as amended; E.O. 12163, Sept.

29, 1979, 44 FR 56673; 3 CFR, 1979 Comp., p. 435.

Subpart 717.70—Pharmaceutical Products

717.770 General.

Parent topic: SUBCHAPTER C—CONTRACTING METHODS AND CONTRACT TYPES

Subpart 717.70—Pharmaceutical Products

717.770 General.

Section 606(c) of the Foreign Assistance Act bars procurement by the Government of drug and

pharmaceutical products manufactured outside the United States if their manufacture involves the

use of or is covered by an unexpired U.S. patent which has not been held invalid by an unappealed

or unappealable court decision unless the manufacture is expressly authorized by the patent owner.

Applicable policies and procedures are set forth in USAID Automated Directive System Chapter 312.
March 10, 2015 

Mr. Richard Devine 

401 Clayton Avenue 

Vestal, NY 13850 

Dear Mr. Devine: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Cannot Process Your Request 

We entered your February 17, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA2015-0379), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent 

does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the 

request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of 

the relief you seek. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Nia Daniels 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1064 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1064

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                    September 29, 2006.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 4954) to improve 
maritime and cargo security through enhanced layered defenses, and for other 
purposes. All points of order against the conference report and against its 
consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered as read.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
### Atrazine Monitoring Program Mattoon, Illinois PWSID: IL0290250

Atrazine Concentration

Sample Date Raw Water Atrazine

(ppb) Raw Water Method of Analysis Finished Water Atrazine

(ppb) Finished Water Method of Analysis 10-Apr-07 0.03 LCMS-2* 0.03 LCMS-2* 16-Apr-07 0.14 LCMS-2 0.16 LCMS-2 23-Apr-07 0.32 LCMS-2 0.07 LCMS-2 30-Apr-07 0.33 LCMS-2 0.10 LCMS-2 7-May-07 0.31 LCMS-2 0.17 LCMS-2 14-May-07 0.25 LCMS-2 0.27 LCMS-2 21-May-07 0.43 LCMS-2 0.31 LCMS-2 29-May-07 0.31 LCMS-2 0.31 LCMS-2 4-Jun-07 0.47 LCMS-2 0.03 LCMS-2* 13-Jun-07 0.49 LCMS-2 0.12 LCMS-2 18-Jun-07 0.38 LCMS-2 0.15 LCMS-2 25-Jun-07 0.34 LCMS-2 0.25 LCMS-2

2-Jul-07 0.34 LCMS-2 0.03 LCMS-2* 9-Jul-07 0.36 LCMS-2 0.03 LCMS-2* 23-Jul-07 0.34 LCMS-2 0.37 LCMS-2 30-Jul-07 0.43 LCMS-2 0.03 LCMS-2* 13-Aug-07 0.36 LCMS-2 0.03 LCMS-2* 30-Aug-07 0.35 LCMS-2 0.32 LCMS-2 10-Sep-07 0.32 LCMS-2 0.32 LCMS-2 24-Sep-07 0.33 LCMS-2 0.09 LCMS-2 10-Oct-07 0.31 LCMS-2 0.03 LCMS-2* 22-Oct-07 0.29 LCMS-2 0.03 LCMS-2* 5-Nov-07 0.25 LCMS-2 0.20 LCMS-2 26-Nov-07 0.32 LCMS-2 0.03 LCMS-2* 3-Dec-07 0.20 LCMS-2 0.11 LCMS-2 Avg. of Qtrly Means 0.31 0.13

*Indicates a non-detection or residue below the method's Limit of Quantitation (LOQ). For purposes of charting and calculation, 1/2 the method LOQ was used. The Immunoassay (IA) atrazine LOQ was 0.10 ppb. The Gas Chromatographic/Mass Selective Detection method (GC/MS) LOQ was 0.1 ppb.The Liquid Chroma tography / Mass Spectrometry / Mass Spectrometry (LC/MS) LOQ was typically 0.05-0.10 ppb. The time-weighted (TW) period mean is an average of quarterly averages.

Printed: 1/14/2009
#### CONDE, Appellant, v. CONDE, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 5, 1914.)

Action by Leon Conde against Mary M. Conde.

R. G. Perry, of New York City, for appellant.

W. S. Evans, of New York City, for respondent.

No opinion. Order modified, as stated in order, and as modified, affirmed, without costs. Order filed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

DELOISE PRICE, | 

 | 

 PLAINTIFF | 

 | 

VS. | CASE NO. 2:06-CV-721 

 | 

WAL-MART STORES, INC., | 

et al., | 

 | 

 DEFENDANTS | 

DEFENDANT EXTREME PERFORMANCE, INC.’S 

MOTION TO SEAL EXHIBIT

 Comes now the Defendant identified as Extreme Performance, Inc. and 

moves this Honorable Court to seal the original Exhibit F to its Motion to Dismiss 

[Doc. 24] and substitute the attached Exhibit F to said Motion. As grounds 

therefor, Defendant would state as follows: 

1. On August 3, 2007, this Defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss 

[Doc. 24]. Attached to said Motion to Dismiss was Exhibit F, a report 

from Dr. Tai Chung. 

2. Said Exhibit F contains personal information relating to Plaintiff, i.e., 

Plaintiff’s date of birth and Social Security number. 

3. The attached replacement Exhibit F has such personal information 

redacted. 

Case 2:06-cv-00721-MHT-TFM Document 35 Filed 10/19/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

 WHEREFORE, this Defendant would request that the attached Exhibit F be 

substituted for the original Exhibit F and that the original Exhibit F be sealed in 

order to protect the Plaintiff’s personal information. 

 /s/ Dennis R. Bailey

 Dennis R. Bailey 

 Attorney for Defendant 

Of counsel: 

RUSHTON, STAKELY, JOHNSTON & GARRETT, P.A. 

184 Commerce Street 

Post Office Box 270 

Montgomery, Alabama 36101-0270 

(334) 206-3234 (phone) 

(334) 481-0031 (fax) 

drb@rsjg.com (e-mail) 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that I have served a copy of the foregoing document upon 

the following counsel of record by placing a copy of same in the United States 

Mail, first class postage prepaid, on this the 19th day of October, 2007. 

 Jock M. Smith 

 Brian P. Strength 

 Valerie Rucker Russell 

 Cochran, Cherry, Givens, Smith, Lane & Taylor 

 Post Office Box 830419 

 Tuskegee, Alabama 36083 

 /s/ Dennis R. Bailey

 Of counsel 

Case 2:06-cv-00721-MHT-TFM Document 35 Filed 10/19/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00721-MHT-TFM Document 35-2 Filed 10/19/2007 Page 1 of 4 Case 2:06-cv-00721-MHT-TFM Document 24 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 1 of 4

Case 2:06-cv-00721-MHT-TFM Document 35-2 Filed 10/19/2007 Page 2 of 4 Case 2:06-cv-00721-MHT-TFM Document 24 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 2 of 4

Case 2:06-cv-00721-MHT-TFM Document 35-2 Filed 10/19/2007 Page 3 of 4 Case 2:06-cv-00721-MHT-TFM Document 24 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 3 of 4

Case 2:06-cv-00721-MHT-TFM Document 35-2 Filed 10/19/2007 Page 4 of 4 Case 2:06-cv-00721-MHT-TFM Document 24 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 4 of 4
Case 2:06-cr-00203-MHT-CSC Document 30 Filed 02/20/2007 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00203-MHT-CSC Document 30 Filed 02/20/2007 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00203-MHT-CSC Document 30 Filed 02/20/2007 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00203-MHT-CSC Document 30 Filed 02/20/2007 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00203-MHT-CSC Document 30 Filed 02/20/2007 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00203-MHT-CSC Document 30 Filed 02/20/2007 Page 6 of 6
§ 701.204 Participant eligibility. ( a ) To be eligible to participate in EFRP, a person or legal entity must be an owner of nonindustrial private forest land affected by a natural disaster, and must be liable for or have the expense that is the subject of the financial assistance. The owner must be a person or legal entity (including an Indian tribe) with full decision-making authority over the land, as determined by FSA, or with such waivers as may be needed from lenders or others as may be required, to undertake program commitments.
( b ) Federal agencies and States, including all agencies and political subdivisions of a State, are ineligible for EFRP.
( c ) An application may be denied for any reason.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

M IDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABA M A

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

September 18, 2006

 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT

To: All Counsel of Record

 

Re: Owen J. Rogal, D.D.S., P.C. v. Skilstaf, Inc. 

Civil Action No. 3:06-cv-00728-VPM

The above-styled case has been reassigned to Judge Myron H. Thompson.

Please note that the case number is now 3:06-cv-00728-(MHT). This new case number should be

used on all future correspondence and pleadings in this action.

 

Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 20 Filed 09/18/2006 Page 1 of 1
§ 1042.310 Recruitment. ( a ) *Nondiscriminatory recruitment.* A recipient to which §§ 1042.300 through 1042.310 apply shall not discriminate on the basis of sex in the recruitment and admission of students. A recipient may be required to undertake additional recruitment efforts for one sex as remedial action pursuant to § 1042.110(a), and may choose to undertake such efforts as affirmative action pursuant to § 1042.110(b).
( b ) *Recruitment at certain institutions.* A recipient to which §§ 1042.300 through 1042.310 apply shall not recruit primarily or exclusively at educational institutions, schools, or entities that admit as students only or predominantly members of one sex, if such actions have the effect of discriminating on the basis of sex in violation of §§ 1042.300 through 1042.310.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3197 

To modify the provisions of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 

States relating to returned property. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mrs. MURRAY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To modify the provisions of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule 

of the United States relating to returned property. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF PROVISIONS RELATING TO 

4 RETURNED PROPERTY. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The article description for sub6 heading 9801.00.10 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 

7 the United States is amended by inserting ‘‘, or products 

8 previously exported from the United States,’’ after 

9 ‘‘United States’’. 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 3197 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
§ 1021.331 Mitigation action plans. ( a ) Following completion of each EIS and its associated ROD, DOE shall prepare a Mitigation Action Plan that addresses mitigation commitments expressed in the ROD. The Mitigation Action Plan shall explain how the corresponding mitigation measures, designed to mitigate adverse environmental impacts associated with the course of action directed by the ROD, will be planned and implemented. The Mitigation Action Plan shall be prepared before DOE takes any action directed by the ROD that is the subject of a mitigation commitment.
( b ) In certain circumstances, as specified in § 1021.322(b)(1), DOE shall also prepare a Mitigation Action Plan for commitments to mitigations that are essential to render the impacts of the proposed action not significant. The Mitigation Action Plan shall address all commitments to such necessary mitigations and explain how mitigation will be planned and implemented. The Mitigation Action Plan shall be prepared before the FONSI is issued and shall be referenced therein.
( c ) Each Mitigation Action Plan shall be as complete as possible, commensurate with the information available regarding the course of action either directed by the ROD or the action to be covered by the FONSI, as appropriate. DOE may revise the Plan as more specific and detailed information becomes available.
( d ) DOE shall make copies of the Mitigation Action Plans available for inspection in the appropriate DOE public reading room(s) or other appropriate location(s) for a reasonable time. Copies of the Mitigation Action Plans shall also be available upon written request.
[57 FR 15144, Apr. 24, 1992, as amended at 76 FR 63787, Oct. 13, 2011]
#### § 993.34 Expenses.

The members of the committee, and alternates when acting as members, or when alternates' expenses are authorized by the committee, shall serve without compensation but shall be allowed their expenses.

[30 FR 9798, Aug. 6, 1965]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v ) CR. NO. 2:06CR200-WHA

)

HECTOR R. SILVA )

ROSA E. RINCON )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the motions to continue hearing (doc. # 72 & 74) filed by the

United States and defendant Rincon and the motion for leave to file (doc. # 71) filed by Rincon,

it is

ORDERED that the motions to continue (doc. # 72& 74) be and are hereby GRANTED.

The evidentiary hearing on defendant Silva’s motion to suppress presently set for November 28,

2006 at 2:00 p.m. be and is hereby RESET to December 7, 2006 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 4B,

United States Courthouse Complex, One Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama. The court will

also hear oral argument on defendant Rincon’s motion for leave to file at that time. The Clerk

is directed to provide a court reporter and an interpreter for these proceedings. 

The Court has previously ordered that defendant Rincon be produced for the evidentiary

hearing. The United States Marshal or the persons having custody of the defendants shall

produce both defendants for these proceedings. 

Done this 21 day of November, 2006. st

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 75 Filed 11/21/2006 Page 1 of 1
2942.1503 Procedures.       (a) In accordance with FAR 42.1502, the contracting officer will prepare an interim evaluation of a contractor's performance at least annually for submission to the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), and specifically the Contractor Performance System maintained by the National Institutes of Health.          (b) The contracting officer, or designee, must determine who will evaluate a contractor's performance. The contracting officer's technical representative, program manager, contract specialists or administrators, and users are candidates likely to be selected to perform the evaluation.          (c) A contractor's performance evaluation should be obtained from a person who monitored contractor performance when that individual's assignment of duties or employment terminates before physical completion of the contract. The areas of performance to be selected for evaluation should be tailored to the type of supplies or services normally acquired by the contracting activities and the type of contract. HCAs must ensure uniformity of the evaluation criteria within their contracting activities.          (d) Release of contractor performance evaluation information.          (1) Requests for performance evaluation information from the public must be processed in accordance with FOIA, as implemented by DOL under 29 CFR part 70.          (2) Release of a contractor's performance evaluation information to other Federal agencies is subject to FAR 42.1502. When the performance evaluation information is released to other federal agencies, it should be provided with a written statement that it is nonpublic information that must be processed under FOIA principles if a request for its disclosure is received.          (e) Even though the retention period for past performance evaluation information is three years (*see* FAR 42.1503), the contractor's performance evaluation, any contractor rebuttal, and final decision become a part of the contract file. Therefore, disposal of the contractor's evaluation information must be accomplished in accordance with FAR 4.804.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2942.15 - Contractor Performance Information
#### Sterling Factors Corporation, Appellant, v. Max Freeman et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants. Sterling Factors Corporation, Appellant, v. Max Freeman et al., Respondents.

In consolidated actions by a corporate factor against guarantors of a corporate indebtedness on their guaranties and to foreclose a mortgage given by them as collateral security, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated July 13,1966, in favor of respondents and dismissing the complaints, after a nonjury trial. Judgment affirmed, with costs. In our opinion, the auction sale of March 1, 1963 and plaintiff’s conduct thereafter were an effective repudiation of the agreement of February 28, 1963. Since plaintiff prevented performance under that contract, it cannot later seek to avail itself of rights obtained thereunder (cf. *Grad*v. *Roberts,*14 N Y 2d 70, 75; *Dulberg*v. *Equitable Life Assur. Soc.,*277 N. Y. 17, 24; *Homer*v. *Guardian Mut. Life Ins. Co.,*67 N. Y. 478, 481). Nor did plaintiff obtain any better rights from the auction sale. The proof established that the sale to plaintiff lacked good faith *(Matter of Kiamie,*309 N. Y. 325; Lien Law, § 202-b) and did not comply with the statutory requirements (Lien Law, § 202). Further, by entering into the agreement of February 28, 1963, which provided for an “ orderly liquidation ” of the debtor’s inventory for the “ mutual benefit ” of plaintiff and the debtor, plaintiff waived its right to sell the property without notice to the debtor *(Toplitz*v. *Bauer,*161 N. Y. 325). There was no contractual provision which permitted such a sale to be held without notice to the guarantors. We agree with Special Term’s finding that the value of the security (the debtor’s inventory) was far greater than the debt. The guarantors must be exonerated from liability, as the security was impaired to an extent greater than the debtor’s obligation to plaintiff *(Antisdel*v. *Williamson,*165 N. Y. 372, 375-376; *Humphrey*v. *Hayes,*94 N. Y. 594, 604). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur. [50 Misc 2d 715.]
# SUBCHAPTER C—CONTRACT METHODS AND CONTRACT TYPES   

- PART 3013 [RESERVED] 
- PART 3014—SEALED BIDDING [RESERVED] 
- PART 3015—CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION 
- PART 3016—TYPES OF CONTRACTS 
- PART 3017—SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS 
- PART 3018—EMERGENCY ACQUISITIONS 

- PART 3013 [RESERVED]       
- PART 3014—SEALED BIDDING [RESERVED]   
- PART 3015—CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION    - Subpart 3015.2—Solicitation and Receipt of Proposals and Information     - 3015.204-3   Contract clauses.
    - 3015.207-70   Handling proposals and information.
  - Subpart 3015.6—Unsolicited Proposals     - 3015.602   Policy.
    - 3015.603   [Reserved]
    - 3015.604   Agency points of contact.
    - 3015.606   Agency procedures.
    - 3015.606-1   Receipt and initial review.
    - 3015.606-2   Evaluation.
- PART 3016—TYPES OF CONTRACTS    - Subpart 3016.1—Selecting Contract Types     - 3016.170   Contracts with Lead System Integrators.
  - Subpart 3016.2—Fixed-Price Contracts     - 3016.203   Fixed price contracts with economic price adjustments.
    - 3016.203-4   Contract clauses.
    - 3016.203-470   Solicitation provision.
  - Subpart 3016.4—Incentive Contracts     - 3016.406   Contract clauses.
  - Subpart 3016.5—Indefinite-Delivery Contracts     - 3016.505   Ordering.
  - Subpart 3016.6—Time-and-Materials, Labor-Hour, and Letter Contracts     - 3016.603   Letter contracts.
    - 3016.603-4   Contract clauses.
- PART 3017—SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS    - Subpart 3017.2—Options     - 3017.202   Use of options.
    - 3017.204   Contracts.
    - 3017.204-90   Detention Facilities and Services (ICE).
  - Subpart 3017.4—Leader Company Contracting     - 3017.402   Limitations.
  - Subpart 3017.90—Fixed Price Contracts for Vessel Repair, Alteration or Conversion     - 3017.9000   Clauses (USCG).
- PART 3018—EMERGENCY ACQUISITIONS     - Subpart 3018.1—Available Acquisition Flexibilities     - 3018.109   Priorities and allocations.
Case 2:06-cv-00678-WKW-SRW Document 6 Filed 09/19/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00678-WKW-SRW Document 6 Filed 09/19/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00678-WKW-SRW Document 6 Filed 09/19/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00678-WKW-SRW Document 6 Filed 09/19/2006 Page 4 of 4