alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          32,051
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,620
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                15,865
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    185,450
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          27,704
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            25,650
<LOANS>                                        660,842
<ALLOWANCE>                                      6,675
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 971,159
<DEPOSITS>                                     712,481
<SHORT-TERM>                                    40,707
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              7,738
<LONG-TERM>                                     91,765
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,806
<OTHER-SE>                                      98,662
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 971,159
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 14,080
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,385
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   298
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                17,763
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,628
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,450
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           10,313
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      330
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,924
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,171
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,148
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,148
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .34
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.11
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,273
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,697
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   337
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 19,232
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 6,964
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      720
<RECOVERIES>                                       101
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                6,675
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,743
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          2,932


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 240 (Wednesday, December 15, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 78245]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31462]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than January 12, 2011.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Dennis Denney, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Citizens National Corporation, Wisner, Nebraska to acquire up to 
an additional 2 percent for a total of approximately 34 percent of the 
voting shares of Republic Corporation, and thereby indirectly control 
United Republic Bank, both in Omaha, Nebraska

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 10, 
2010.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-31462 Filed 12-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHNSON NAPITULPULU, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

Nos. 13-71873

14-71291

Agency No. A095-634-743 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 26, 2017**

Before: PAEZ, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Johnson Napitulpulu, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review 

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) orders denying his motions to 

reopen removal proceedings based on changed country conditions (No. 13-71873) 

and based on ineffective assistance of counsel (No. 14-71291). We have

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes these cases are suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUL 7 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 14-71291 

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s 

denial of a motion to reopen, Toufighi v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d 988, 992 (9th Cir. 

2008), and we deny the petitions for review.

As to No. 13-71873, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying 

Napitulpulu’s motion to reopen where it was filed more than five years after the 

BIA’s final order, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and Napitulpulu failed to establish 

prima facie eligibility for the relief he sought, see Toufighi, 538 F.3d at 996 (the 

BIA may deny a motion to reopen based on changed country conditions for failure 

to establish a prima case); Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1065 (9th Cir. 2009) 

(even under disfavored group analysis, petitioner must present some evidence of 

individualized risk).

As to No. 14-71291, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying 

Napitulpulu’s motion to reopen based on ineffective assistance of counsel where it 

was filed more than six years after the BIA’s final order and was numericallybarred, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and where Napitupulu failed to demonstrate 

that he acted with the due diligence required to warrant equitable tolling, see 

Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 897 (9th Cir. 2003) (equitable tolling of time and 

numerical limitations on motions to reopen available where petitioner is prevented 

from filing due to deception, fraud or error, and exercises due diligence).

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Case 2:06-cv-00704-WKW-CSC Document 2 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00704-WKW-CSC Document 2 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00704-WKW-CSC Document 2 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 3 of 3
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

Appellate case name: The Board of Trustees of the Houston Firefighters’ Relief and 

Retirement Fund v. The City of Houston, Texas

Appellate case number: 01-12-01167-CV

Trial court case number: 1228760

Trial court: 189th District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: March 13, 2015

Party filing motion: Appellee, The City of Houston, Texas

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is DENIED GRANTED.

Judge’s signature: Harvey Brown

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Justices Jennings and Brown

Date: July 14, 2015
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

JAMES KUCZMASKI, etc., )

et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv731-MHT

) 

US FOODSERVICE, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the joint motion to add Fredrick

S. Kuczmaski as plaintiff (Doc. No. 39) is granted.

DONE, this the 11th day of September, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 41 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 1 of 1
###### Editorial Note on Part 94

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 94 appear at 61 FR 51352, Oct. 2 1996.

#### § 94.1 General.

Microbiological, chemical, and physical analysis of liquid, frozen, and dried egg products is performed under authority of the Egg Products Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 1031-1056).
#### LASSLEY v. BROWNELL.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

October 28, 1912.)

No. 1,995.

Mines and Minerals (§ 38*) — Lands in Alaska — Contest Between Homestead Settler and Mineral Locator — Suit to Quiet Title.

In Act May 14, 1898, c. 299, § 10, 30 Stat. 413 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1469), authorizing persons, associations, or corporations occupying public lands in Alaska for purposes of trade, etc., to purchase the same, not exceeding 80 acres, the provision for the bringing of a suit to quiet title by an adverse claimant does not apply to contests arising between homestead settlers and locators of mineral claims concerning the mineral or nonmineral character of the land claimed by both, which is a matter within the jurisdiction of the Land Department; nor is such provision extended by the amendment of March 3, 1903 (32 Stat. 1028, c. 1002 [U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1911, p. 606]).

[Ed. *Note.-*— Eor other cases, see Mines and Minerals, Cent. Dig. §§ 871/2-113; Dec. Dig. § 38.*]

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Third Division of the Territory of Alaska; Edward E. Cushman, Judge.

Action at law by H. E. Lassley against Don Carlos Brownell. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

Affirmed.

S. O. Morford, of Seward, Alaska, and Jas. Alva Watt, of San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff in error.

D. V. Ray, of Seward, Alaska, for defendant in error.

Before GILBERT, ROSS, and MORROW, Circuit Judges.

GILBERT, Circuit Judge.

The questions presented in this case are identical with those which were involved in the case of John A. Nelson v. Don Carlos Brownell, 193 Fed. 641, 113 C. C. A. 509, decided at a recent term of this court.

Upon' the considerations and authorities which led to the decision in that case, the iudument of the court below in the present case is affirmed.
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Outdoor Channel Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,William A. Owen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the bestof my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ William A. Owen     |       |       |
|-------------------------|------------|------------|
| **William A. Owen**     | ** ** | ** ** |
| Chief Financial Officer |       |       |
| February 16, 2007       |       |       |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to OutdoorChannel Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Outdoor ChannelHoldings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

----
March 19, 2013

Mr. Todd Watkins

Director of Maintenance

Sierra Pacific Airlines

7700 North Business Park Drive Tucson, AZ 85743

Dear Mr. Watkins:

This is in response to your February 28, 2013 letter sent to the public docket (No. FAA-2013-0226) petitioning the Federal Aviati on Administration on behalf of Sierra Pacific Airlines for an exemption from § 121.803(c)(3) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would provide relief from the requirement to include Dextrose in an Emergency Medical Kit (EMK).

On March 14, 2013, the FAA issued Exemption No. 10721 (copy enclosed) to Airlines for America, National Air Carrier Association, Re gional Airline Association, its members, and similarly situated air carriers.

Because the relief you seek is now covered under Exemption No. 10721, we will take no further action on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/ Ida M. Klepper Manager, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3346 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3346

             To suspend temporarily the duty on ester gums.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 26, 2006

  Mr. Specter introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To suspend temporarily the duty on ester gums.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ESTER GUMS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.38.07        Ester gums (CAS No.     Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           65997-12-8) (provided                                             31/2009          ''
                           for in subheading                                                                   .
                           3806.30.00)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1706.1 Scope; statement of policy. ( a ) *Scope.* This part sets forth the guidelines, requirements, and procedures the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board will follow in determining whether a contractor or offeror has an organizational or consultant conflict of interest (OCI) and in avoiding, neutralizing, or mitigating OCIs.
( b ) *Policy.* It is the policy of the Board to identify and then avoid or mitigate organizational and consultant conflicts of interest. Normally, the Board will not award contracts to offerors who have OCIs and will terminate contracts where OCIs are identified following contract award. In exceptional circumstances, the Board reserves the right to waive conflicts of interest if it determines that such action is in the best interests of the Government, pursuant to § 1706.8, and to take such mitigating measures as it deems appropriate pursuant to such section.
#### § 993.93 Amendments.

Amendments to this subpart may be proposed from time to time, by any person or by the committee, and may be made a part of this subpart by the procedures provided under the act.
Searched for **http://bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cnscj.pdf**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cnscj.pdf**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
PART 714—SEALED BIDDING

Authority: Sec. 621, Pub. L. 87–195, 75 Stat. 445, (22 U.S.C. 2381) as amended; E.O. 12163, Sept.

29, 1979, 44 FR 56673; 3 CFR, 1979 Comp., p. 435.

Subpart 714.4—Opening of Bids and Award of Contract

714.407-3 Other mistakes disclosed before award.

714.407-4 Mistakes after award.

714.408-170 Partner vetting.

Parent topic: SUBCHAPTER C—CONTRACTING METHODS AND CONTRACT TYPES

Subpart 714.4—Opening of Bids and Award of Contract

714.407-3 Other mistakes disclosed before award.

The M/OAA Director is the designated central authority to make the determinations described in (48

CFR) FAR 14.407–3.

714.407-4 Mistakes after award.

The M/OAA Director is the designated central authority to make the determinations described in (48

CFR) FAR 14.407–4.

714.408-170 Partner vetting.

If an acquisition is identified as subject to vetting, see (48 CFR) AIDAR 704.70 for the applicable

procedures and requirements.
#### § 932.38 Expenses.

The committee is authorized to incur such expenses as the Secretary finds are reasonable and likely to be incurred by the committee for its maintenance and functioning and to enable it to exercise its powers and perform its duties in accordance with the provisions of this part. The funds to cover such expenses shall be acquired in the manner prescribed in § 932.39.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. George L. Faulkner, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 27, 1967, convicting defendant of assault in the second degree (two counts) and maiming, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, and indictment dismissed. Under sections 242 and 1400 of the Penal Law of 1909, the element, of “ intent ” is necessary to sustain convictions for assault in the second degree *791and maiming. In our view the People failed to prove the essential element of “intent” beyond a reasonable doubt *(People*v. *La Belle,*18 N Y 2d 405, 412) and, accordingly, the convictions cannot be sustained. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Munder, JJ., concur.
#### § 58.924 Aseptic filling.

A previously ultra pasteurized product shall be filled under conditions which prevent contamination of the product by living organisms or spores. The containers prior to being filled shall be sterilized and maintained, in a sterile condition. The containers shall be sealed in a manner that prevents contamination of the product.
§ 986.53 Powers. The Council shall have the following powers: ( a ) To administer the provisions of this part in accordance with its terms;
( b ) To make bylaws, rules and regulations to effectuate the terms and provisions of this part;
( c ) To receive, investigate, and report to the Secretary complaints of violations of this part; and
( d ) To recommend to the Secretary amendments to this part.
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 55 Filed 03/14/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 55 Filed 03/14/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of the Report of The 1966 October Monroe County Grand Jury Submitted Pursuant to Section 253-a of The Code of Criminal Procedure.

Order of Monroe County Court accepting report dated January 17, 1967 of the October 1966 Monroe County Grand Jury unanimously modified to provide that said report shall be filed as a public record after paragraphs thirteen, fourteen and fifteen have been deleted therefrom and the report as to said paragraphs shall forever be sealed and shall not be filed as a public record, subject to subpoena or otherwise made public.— Memorandum: This is an appeal by a public officer pursuant to section 517-a of the Code of Criminal Procedure to review an order accepting a Grand Jury report purportedly made in accordance with section 253-a of the same code. Paragraph (a) of subdivision 1 of the latter section authorizes a Grand Jury to report “ concerning non-criminal misconduct, nonfeasance or neglect in office by a public officer or employee as the basis for a recommendation of removal or disciplinary action ”. Paragraphs 13, 14 and 15 of the report before us while finding “no criminal responsibility” on the part of appellant charge the official with many specified acts of neglect of duty and other acts of commission and omission that could be characterized as misconduct and nonfeasance. The report, however, fails to state, as required by the statute, that these allegations were set forth as the basis for a further recommendation by the Grand Jury that appellant be removed from office or otherwise disciplined. These statutory provisions were enacted (L. 1964, ch. 350) to permit, with appropriate safeguards, Grand Juries to make presentments as to noncriminal misconduct or neglect by public officers and employees, which right “in the absence of a clear grant of legislative authority ” had been earlier denied such bodies *(Matter of Wood*v. *Hughes,*9 N Y 2d 144, 156). The contention of the District Attorney that he had no power of removal is beside the point. The statute requires allegations of noneriminai misconduct and a recommendation hy the Grand Jury of removal or disciplinary action by the proper authority. In the absence of the latter the stated paragraphs of the report must be suppressed in perpetuity. (Appeal from order of Monroe County Court accepting report of Grand Jury.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Del Vecchio, JJ.
Case 1:06-cr-00170-WHA-CSC Document 443 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:06-cr-00170-WHA-CSC Document 443 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 2 of 6
Case 1:06-cr-00170-WHA-CSC Document 443 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:06-cr-00170-WHA-CSC Document 443 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 4 of 6
Case 1:06-cr-00170-WHA-CSC Document 443 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:06-cr-00170-WHA-CSC Document 443 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 6 of 6
Subpart 1325.1 - Buy American Act - Supplies

Parent topic: PART 1325 - FOREIGN ACQUISITION

1325.103 Exceptions.

(a) The designee authorized to make a determination that domestic preference would be inconsistent

with the public interest in a case where the DOC has an agreement with a foreign government

providing a blanket exception to the Buy America Act is set forth in CAM 1301.70.

(b)

(1) The contracting officer shall submit documentation supporting a nonavailability determination to

the DOC's representative to the Civilian Agency Acquisition Council (CAAC). The DOC representative

shall forward the documentation to the CAAC for possible removal of the product from the product

nonavailablity list at FAR 25.104.

(2) The contracting officer shall submit documentation supporting a determination that

nonavailabilty of an article is likely to affect future acquisitions to the DOC's representative to the

CAAC for possible addition to the product nonavailability list at FAR 25.104.

1325.105 Determining reasonableness of cost.

The designee authorized to make a written determination that the use of higher evaluation factors

than those in FAR 25.105(b) is appropriate is set forth in CAM 1301.70.