alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

November 22, 2010 

d1115 

Order 

 

November 22, 2010 

140750 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140750 

 COA: 289330 

Eaton CC: 08-000125-AR 

LINDA SUE CORR, 56A DC: 08-000368-FY 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 9, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

B. B., a minor, by and through his mother )

and next friend, OWENA KNOWLES, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) 3:06-CV-00715-MHT-TFM

)

PAWN CITY, INC., INTERSTATE ARMS )

CORPORATION, NORINCO a/k/a CHINA )

NORTH INDUSTRIES CORPORATION, et al )

 )

Defendants. )

ORDER

Upon of review of Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Defendant Norinco’s Discovery

Responses Within Fourteen (14) Days (Doc. 21, filed February 20, 2007), it is 

ORDERED that Defendant Norinco show cause why this motion should not be

granted on or before February 28, 2007.

DONE this 20th day of February, 2007.

/s/Terry F. Moorer 

 TERRY F. MOORER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 22 Filed 02/20/2007 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>   1
PART II, ITEM 6, EXHIBIT 11.


                               EGAN SYSTEMS, INC.
                       COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                   Nine Months Ended
                                                                                                    September 30,
                                                                                                    -------------
                                                                                           1997                       1996
                                                                                           ----                       ----
<S>                                                                                    <C>                        <C>
Net income applicable to common stock                                                  $      13,284              $      14,154
                                                                                       =============              =============
                                                                
                                                                
Outstanding shares - common stock at January 1,                                           10,185,000                 10,185,000
                                                                
                                                                
Dilutive effect of stock options and warrants                                              7,673,630                     -
                                                                
                                                                
Weighted average shares issued during period                                               1,568,570                     -     
                                                                                       -------------               ------------
                                                                
                                                                
Weighted average common shares outstanding -                    
 primary and fully diluted - September 30,                                                19,427,200                 10,185,000
                                                                                       =============              =============
                                                                
                                                                
Net income (loss) per common share -                            
 primary and fully diluted - September 30,                                             $        0.00              $        0.00
                                                                                       =============              =============
</TABLE>





                                       11
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6697

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TREMELL RASHAUD MCKINNEY, a/k/a Truth,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Wilmington. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (7:10-cr-00063-D-1)

Submitted: August 25, 2020 Decided: August 28, 2020

Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tremell Rashaud McKinney, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United 

States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Tremell Rashaud McKinney appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 

motion seeking a sentence reduction pursuant to the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 

115-391, § 404, 132 Stat. 5194, 5222. We have reviewed the record and find that the court 

did not abuse its discretion in declining to reduce McKinney’s sentence. Accordingly, we 

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. McKinney, No. 7:10-cr00063-D-1 (E.D.N.C. May 7, 2020). We deny McKinney’s motion for the appointment of 

counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Subpart 336.1 - General

**Parent topic:**PART 336 - CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS

## 336.104 Policy.

Contracting officers shall follow the policies described in Federal Acquisition Regulation 36.104 and the guidance promulgated by the Department of Health and Human Services Facilities Management.
#### § 993.91 Procedure upon termination.

Upon the termination of this subpart, the members of the committee then functioning shall continue as joint trustees, for the purpose of liquidating the affairs of the committee. Action by such trustee shall require the concurrence of a majority of the said trustees. Such trustees shall continue in such capacity until discharged by the Secretary, and shall, from time to time, account for all receipts and disbursements and deliver all property on hand, together with all books and records of the committee and the joint trustees, to such person as the Secretary may direct; and shall, upon the request of the Secretary, execute such assignments or other instruments necessary or appropriate to vest in such person full title and right to all the funds, properties, and claims vested in the committee or the joint trustees, pursuant to this subpart. Any person to whom funds, property, or claims have been transferred or delivered by the committee or the joint trustees, pursuant to this section, shall be subject to the same obligations imposed upon the members of the said committee and upon said joint trustees.
#### §§ 766.121-766.150 [Reserved]
#### In re GREEN.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

July 31, 1914.)

In the matter of the application of Lemuel B. Green for a writ of mandamus.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
157 So.2d 231

#### Herbert BETTIS v. Audie J. PERRY et al.

No. 46959.

Nov. 12, 1963.

In re: The Travelers Insurance Company and Audie J. Perry applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Beauregard. 155 So.2d 862.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal we find no error of law in the judgment complained of.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

April 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 133200 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, DAVID BARBER, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 133200 

 COA: 262733 

Genesee CC: 04-080417-NZ 

JOHNNIE COLEMAN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 4, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0416 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 24, 2007 

 Clerk
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 2.346 Authority of the Secretary. When briefs, motions or other documents are submitted to the Commission itself, as opposed to officers who have been delegated authority to act for the Commission, the Secretary or the Assistant Secretary is authorized to: ( a ) Prescribe procedures for the filing of briefs, motions, or other pleadings, when the schedules differ from those prescribed by the rules of this part or when the rules of this part do not prescribe a schedule;
( b ) Rule on motions for extensions of time;
( c ) Reject motions, briefs, pleadings, and other documents filed with the Commission later then the time prescribed by the Secretary or the Assistant Secretary or established by an order, rule or regulation of the Commission unless good cause is shown for the late filing;
( d ) Prescribe all procedural arrangements relating to any oral argument to be held before the Commission;
( e ) Extend the time for the Commission to rule on a petition for review under § 2.341;
( f ) Extend the time for the Commission to grant review on its own motion under § 2.341;
( g ) Direct pleadings improperly filed before the Commission to the appropriate presiding officer for action;
( h ) Deny a request for hearings, where the request fails to comply with the Commission's pleading requirements set forth in this part, and fails to set forth an arguable basis for further proceedings;
( i ) Refer to the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel or an Administrative Judge, as appropriate requests for hearing not falling under § 2.104, where the requestor is entitled to further proceedings; and
( j ) Take action on other minor matters.
[69 FR 2236, Jan. 14, 2004, as amended at 72 FR 49152, Aug. 28, 2007; 77 FR 46597, Aug. 3, 2012; 78 FR 34247, June 7, 2013]
###### Editorial Note on Part 1045

#### Editorial Notes:Nomenclature changes to part 1045 appear at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023, and 88 FR 82238, Nov. 24, 2023.

§ 1045.55 When are RD, FRD, and TFNI considered for declassification?

Editorial Notes:

Nomenclature changes to part 1045 appear at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023, and 88 FR 82238, Nov. 24, 2023.

RD, FRD, and TFNI information and matter are considered for declassification during several processes.

(a) DOE reviews all classification guides containing RD, FRD, or TFNI topics at least once every 5 years to determine if information identified as RD, FRD, or TFNI still meets the criteria for classification under § 1045.70. If RD, FRD, and TFNI information contained in a classification guide does not meet the standards for classification, the information is declassified.

(b) TFNI is no longer TFNI when comparable U.S. RD is declassified.

(c) Agencies with holdings containing RD, FRD, or TFNI should periodically review holdings that are likely to have a high degree of public interest and a likelihood of declassification. If any matter containing RD, FRD, or TFNI is identified for declassification, agencies must coordinate the declassification of matter marked as RD, FRD, or TFNI with DOE or DoD, as appropriate.

(d) RD, FRD, or TFNI information or matter containing RD, FRD, or TFNI in particular areas of public interest may be considered for declassification if sufficient interest is demonstrated. Proposals for the systematic review of given collections or subject areas must be addressed to the Director, Office of Classification, EHSS-60/Germantown Building, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20585.

(e) During the FOIA and MDR request process, agencies must refer any responsive matter that is marked as or potentially contains RD, FRD, or TFNI to DOE or DoD, as provided under Subpart F. During this process, the information may be reviewed to determine it still meets the standards for classification.

(f) The public and persons with access to RD, FRD, or TFNI may submit a declassification proposal for RD, FRD, or TFNI under § 1045.105.

[83 FR 66007, Dec. 21, 2018, as amended at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023]
EXHIBIT 3.1   ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION (PURSUANT TO NRS CHAPTER 78)  Filed in the office of the Secretary of State, State of Nevada, Document Number 2006018433.  Filing Date and Time: 03/24/2006 11:52 AM, Entity Number E022281200. Amended and Restated as of July 21, 2016.  1. Name of Corporation:NEXGEN APPLIED SOLUTIONS INC.  2. Registered Agent for Service of Process: Commercial Registered Agent: Frederick C. Bauman, 6228 Dartle Street, Las Vegas, NV 89130.  3. Authorized Stock:  Number of Shares with par value: 400,000,000.  Par value per share: $0.001.  Number of shares without par value: 0  4. Names and Addresses of the Board of Directors / Trustees: Robert Coleridge, 1685 H Street, Suite 676, Blaine, WA 98230  5. Purpose:  any lawful purpose.  6. Name, Address and Signature of Incorporator:  CSC Services of Nevada, Inc. 502 East John Street, Carson City, NV 89706  7. Certificate of Acceptance of Appointment of Registered Agent:  I hereby accept appointment as Registered Agent for the above named corporation: /s/ Frederick C. Bauman.
Case 1:06-cv-00708-CSC Document 18 Filed 03/01/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00708-CSC Document 18 Filed 03/01/2007 Page 2 of 2
52.237-1 Site Visit.

As prescribed in 37.110(a), insert the following provision:

Site Visit (Apr 1984)

Offerors or quoters are urged and expected to inspect the site where services are to be performed

and to satisfy themselves regarding all general and local conditions that may affect the cost of

contract performance, to the extent that the information is reasonably obtainable. In no event shall

failure to inspect the site constitute grounds for a claim after contract award.

(End of provision)

Parent topic: 52.237 [Reserved]
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Attached files include redacted version of withheld confidential 

information.

Withheld document contains privileged and confidential trade secrets and commercial or

financial information which is exempt from disclosure under 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4).
1832.1110 Solicitation provision and contract

clauses. (NASA supplements paragraphs (a),

(b), and (c)).

(a) [Reserved]

(b) In accordance with FAR 32.1106(b), the use of a nondomestic EFT mechanism is authorized.

When a nondomestic EFT mechanism is used, the contracting officer shall replace the paragraph at

FAR 52.232–34(c) with a description of the EFT mechanism that will be used for the contract.

Parent topic: Subpart 1832.11—Electronic Funds Transfer
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23 - 50701 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff
— Appellee **,** versus **Eric Silva -**  **Gomez,** Defendant
— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:21 - CR - 152 - 5

**_______________________ _______**  Before **Jolly, Engelhardt,** and **Douglas,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** The attorney appointed to represent Eric Silva - Gomez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Silva - Gomez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and t he relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir .**  **R .**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 30, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-50701 Document: 48-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/30/2024No. 23 - 50701

2 appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED** . See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2 . Case: 23-50701 Document: 48-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/30/2024
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Harold E. Miller, Jr., the senior officer of Franklin Capital Corporation (the Servicer) in charge of servicing, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Franklin Auto Trust 2006-1 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2.

Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by the report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.

I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the Servicer and based upon my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the Servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5.

The report on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and its related attestation report on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





Date: December 14, 2007

/s/ Harold E. Miller, Jr.

HAROLD E. MILLER, JR.

President & Chief Executive Officer

(Senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>  0000763820
<NAME> MORTGAGE PARTNERS LTD. - III

       
<S>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>     DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>          SEP-30-1996

<CASH>                        8,359,856 
<SECURITIES>                       0    
<RECEIVABLES>                   505,800 
<ALLOWANCES>                       0    
<INVENTORY>                        0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              8,865,656 
<PP&E>                       10,411,449 
<DEPRECIATION>                  983,909 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               51,894,601 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           380,888 
<BONDS>                            0    
<COMMON>                           0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0    
<PREFERRED>                        0    
<OTHER-SE>                   47,772,375 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 51,894,601 
<SALES>                       2,202,259 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              4,703,685 
<CGS>                              0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   999,141 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                510,107 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 0    
<INCOME-PRETAX>               3,194,437 
<INCOME-TAX>                       0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           2,727,629 
<DISCONTINUED>                1,619,622 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0    
<CHANGES>                          0    
<NET-INCOME>                  4,347,251 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                     63.07 
<EPS-DILUTED>                     63.07 

        


</TABLE>
§ 11.8 Information collection requirements: OMB approval. ( a ) The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has submitted the information collection requirements contained in this part to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. *et seq.*). The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has approved the information collection requirements contained in this part under control number 3150-0062.
( b ) The approved information collection requirements contained in this part appear in §§ 11.9, 11.11, 11.13, 11.15, and 11.16.
( c ) In § 11.15, the Standard Form 86 (SF-86), “Electronic Questionnaire for Investigations Processing (e-QIP), SF-86—Questionnaire for National Security Positions,” is approved under control number 3206-0005.
[62 FR 52185, Oct. 6, 1997, as amended at 87 FR 45240, July 28, 2022]
# Subpart 2849.1 - General Principles

**Parent topic:**PART 2849 - TERMINATION OF CONTRACTS

## 2849.106 Fraud or other criminal conduct.

If the contracting officer has reason to suspect fraud or other criminal conduct related to the settlement negotiations of a terminated contract, the contracting officer shall discontinue the negotiations and report the facts supporting the suspicion through the HCA or designee to the OIG.     

## 2849.111 Review of proposed settlements.

The HCA or designee may establish procedures for the review and approval of settlement agreements at a level above the contracting officer. In addition, all proposed termination settlements shall be reviewed by legal counsel.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

BLANCA MARTINEZ,

Appellant, 

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00271-CR

Appeal from the

County Court at Law Number Two

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20190C03399)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 31ST DAY OF MARCH, 2021.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.