alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|  |  | [if !supportLineBreakNewLine]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications.
 
Title: Teachers  resource guide [electronic resource] : honoring all  who served : Veterans Day, November 11, 2006.
SuDoc Number: VA 1.10:H 75
Item Number:  0987 (online)
Veterans Day Teachers Resource Guide School Kit (8.8  MB; 38 pages)
Resource Guide Teachers' Section (2.6 MB; 11 pages)
Students Grades 4-7 (3.8 MB; 21 pages)
Students Grades 8-12 (3.3 MB; 13 pages)
 
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  January 27,  2017  Page Name:  https://permanent.fdlp.gov/lps75278/index.htm
  |
|--|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
§ 1003.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) This part establishes the procedures to be utilized in certain proceedings before the Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Department of Energy, where comprehensive procedures are not to be found in another part of DOE's regulations. These procedures provide standard rules of practice in a variety of informal adjudications when jurisdiction is vested in the Office of Hearings and Appeals, including requests for adjustments from DOE rules, regulations, and orders under the authority of 42 U.S.C. 7194 as well as other requests for relief with respect to final dispositions of DOE. Any or all of the procedures contained in this part may be adopted by reference in another DOE program, statute, rule, regulation, guidance, or DOE delegation of authority that invokes the adjudicatory authority of the Office of Hearings and Appeals. These rules do not apply to proceedings governed by a federal statute or DOE regulation that contains comprehensive procedures specifically applicable to proceedings conducted under the authority of that regulation. (*e.g.*, 10 CFR part 708—DOE Contractor Employee Protection Program; 10 CFR part 710—Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear Material; 10 CFR part 1004—Freedom of Information Act (FOIA); 10 CFR part 712—Human Reliability Program.)
( b ) Wherever another DOE program, statute, rule, regulation, guidance, or DOE delegation of authority references or adopts by reference the procedures set forth in a subpart contained in a previous iteration of this part, regardless of the subpart referenced, the procedures set forth in this part shall be deemed to apply.
MINUTES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

HON. MYRON H. THOMPSON, JUDGE AT MONTGOMERY ALABAMA

DATE COMMENCED January 31, 2007 AT 2:55 A.M./P.M.

DATE COMPLETED January 31, 2007 AT 3:22 A.M./P.M.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Criminal Action

2:06cr203-MHT 

VS.

JOSEPH LEE STRINGER

 

PLAINTIFF/GOVERNMENT APPEARANCES DEFENDANT(S)

AUSA Christopher A. Synder X Atty Jennifer A. Hart

X

X

X

 X 

COURT OFFICIALS PRESENT:

Anthony Green, Daniel Korobkin, Mitchell Reisner,

Courtroom Clerk Law Clerk Court Reporter

PROCEEDINGS:

( ) NONJURY TRIAL

(x) OTHER PROCEEDING: SENTENCING HEARING

2:55 p.m. Sentencing hearing commenced. Terms of plea

agreement stated on the record.

3:00 p.m. Break for parties to discuss modification of

sentence.

3:20 p.m. Sentencing hearing continues. Parties agree

to amend sentence as stated on the record.

JOINT ORAL MOTION to continue sentencing.

Order to issue continuing sentencing.

3:22 p.m. Hearing concluded.

Case 2:06-cr-00203-MHT-CSC Document 27 Filed 01/31/2007 Page 1 of 1
!
"#$% 
 !

	
	&  

'
(		)*	
+
 	
 !
"#$% 
 !"

	
	& 

,-.-/012/0.-

3455677648 9/4:-;:68<=5-/6;0>7

3487?5-/7 A
 @!

BCDEFECGHBIJKHLCMHGHNEKHCOPLCDEKHCQRHSLIHTGESULTHCJENEBVUDENHKMNEWGH

 MHGHNEKETGPLCDEKXLYZSEICQ[UJ\LFFCDLRUJ\LFFC

]		^
	!			


	_
			
		`	





!


a
	


	b 
c	!

	

d
`		
	


e

	_


	



!
	
	
 f
g
f
	
	
		
	

	
		

_




h		
	!h			^

	

	
		

		
		



	
 i!	

	jA	
	
		e		

	
k	
	
	
		!
	


	
c


`
fi!
	
	b		
l
	

	fmi!

n	

i	

ofa


	fm	


a

o 

p

		




				





	


d
	 
`
c
a
	

	

					

	
	

		


	

!



		
g	

 p	

		

a
	

	k		

		e
"%
	
 a	!


^
	

	



c

A^

a
			

	


	



d	
			_

^


g	
		


	

	

!	 !

	c
		!			
	



c	
	
		

	_

	

		
			
	j

		 

p		!
	


	

a
	
	b			!
!		k	^
	

d



	 	
^


^
		
		_
			



h	

^

h
!

	c	

	!
			



!		

	
!	

		
^

					

g	
 

a

	
!	j^
	!

!		
	
				
	_
	
		

	_
^
			





	
						c

			c		c	
c
	
d^	

	
		c
				
				 


	
	

g			!

	c		



		





`		


 

		

c
	e	

		_	
!	


d	
	
!	d				
	_


g	
h	q	Ac				
	_!		k	^


			 b





^c
	

	_
	



	
			

	


!	 i!

	


!
	





	
		_ 

p	n_

	
n
m

	'	
no	r
	
i	_

	
	bmb a r







*		!

o			



^




!	j	
	
		





	
	


		
	

	!


j	

	

	

i	
	

	
	
^
q

	


		
	_		_
!



	c^


!		
				
	_

gd

c	
!
	
_


^

	
^
f


	
g

	 f

i^




	_





	
	f f

i^




	q

	
!	 
	c


	

	^


				
		

	

f	f

	


c
!	

	d	
`		
gd


	_ 

]q

	
!	^


	q



_	!						
_

	_		 

s	`



	c	^




q



_	+
+	



	
		_
		
	




				 ic



g
			


g
		
	_
!



	 b




	

	
!		


!q!	 

a


	!	^
	
		
		jA	




c
	

p	n_

	
n
m

	'	
no+"$$+'n+tpm&"+&%$o

@

 
 ! 

a

@
_	
	bmb a 	@
a

o a
		
d		
	d!		k


m	`
Au

o
!A	


_	 

	u

	
			
		
s

s
s
	 

p	
	_





	

d
		e

	

	_
	r
	
i	_

	


	bmb a r





*		!

baivrsa
	
o '
e
$"+$%$+&w'll$"+$+## 

i	

cd
	
	_
A
	


	 	`  ! p	
	_




	



	

d


	

	 		d
	c
a
	


	A
	
	
			

^
	


	_
	
			

 n
	e
(

a
	  ! 

xyz{|}~}{}{z
 	
	



	
	


	
			
	



 	
 !
"#$% 
 !

	
	&  

'	()		*	

	
			

+
,	
	

	
	-
!	.	

	
		




	+					
	

	-



		,	 		

		/
*			


	+

!		

	

0


 !	
	!	1"$$1()12'31"$$1&"1&%$45((61"7717%&1

7 '	()!
		/
*	

		
			

	
!	
	
	
!					


)

	
)389:;<=>?@>:AB:>C4/

D		

	!
	


	



	



	E

F	*
 

GHIJKLMNKOPPO

'	Q

(
	-71R!1"%S(
709.507-2 Contract clause.       (a)–(b) [Reserved]          (c) In order to avoid problems from organizational conflicts of interest that may be discovered after award of a contract, the clause found at 752.209–71 shall be inserted in all contracts whenever the solicitation or resulting contract or both include a provision in accordance with (48 CFR) FAR 9.507–1, or a clause in accordance with (48 CFR) FAR 9.507–2, establishing a restraint on the contractor's eligibility for future contracts.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 709.5—Organizational Conflicts of Interest
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

BRIAN BONNER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 3:06cv715-MHT

) 

NORINCO a/k/a CHINA NORTH )

INDUSTRIES CORP., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

There being no objection, it is ORDERED that the

motion for leave to amend answer (Doc. No. 62) is

granted.

 DONE, this the 4th day of December, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 65 Filed 12/04/2007 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 34.1

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

Cenlar FSB:

We have examined managements assertion, included in the accompanying Management Assessment, that Cenlar FSB (the Company) complied with the servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB for the residential mortgage loans platform as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014 except for 1122 (d)(1)(iii), which the
Company has determined is not applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the servicing platform covered by this report See Appendix A of Managements Assessment for the asset backed transactions covered by this platform
Management is responsible for the Companys compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assertion about the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria based on our
examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such
other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset backed transactions and securities that comprise the platform, testing of less than all of the servicing
activities related to the Platform and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected
transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected
the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements
assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014, for the residential mortgage loans platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.



|                     
|---------------------
|/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
|                     
|February 27, 2015
#### Arlethia Brown, Appellant, v. James S. Brown, Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Additional support for Special Term’s conclusion that costs of publication are not included in the items provided for poor persons or for which they are excused from payment by CPLR article 11 is found in the Second Preliminary Report of the Advisory Committee on Practice and Procedure [1958]. There the committee, which drafted the article substantially as it was enacted, described the article as “a reorganizational and consolidation” of the sections and rules then existing with regard to poor persons, which was “ merely a recodification of present statutes and rules ” (p. 387). Changes which were effected by the new statute are discussed at length in the report and nowhere is there any reference to payment of auxiliary expenses in the form of costs of publication by the county. The note to the section listing the poor person’s right to assigned counsel, a stenographic transcript, appeal on typewritten papers and freedom from liability for costs and fees unless a recovery is had in his favor states that this rule *“*enumerates the privileges which inure to a person who is permitted to proceed as a poor person ” (p. 392). In view of these clear indications that there was no intent to add to the benefits accruing to poor persons by the enactment of article 11 of the CPLR, the argument that this article is statutory authority for payment by the county of appellant’s costs of publication is without merit. We do not reach the constitutional question urged by appellant for the first time on this appeal. It is conceded that the issue of whether denial of access to the courts in a matrimonial action by reason of indigency violates the Equal Protection Clause of the constitution was intentionally not raised or presented at Special Term. Ordinarily constitutional questions are deemed to have been waived on appeal if they were not raised in some manner in the court below. *(People*v. *De Renzzio,*19 N Y 2d 45, 50-51; *People*v. *Friola,*11 N Y 2d 157, 159; *Von Diezleski*v. *Food Fair Stores,*18 A D 2d 724.) (Appeal from order of Onondaga Special Term, denying motion to charge publication cost to county.) Present — Del Vecchio, J. P., Marsh, Gabrielli, Bastow and Henry, JJ.
Subpart 2850.1 - Extraordinary Contractual

Actions

Parent topic: PART 2850 - EXTRAORDINARY CONTRACTUAL ACTIONS AND THE SAFETY ACT

2850.100 Definition.

Approving authority as used in this part means the Attorney General.
1335.017-4 Reviewing FFRDCs.       The designee authorized to approve the continuation or termination of the sponsorship of an FFRDC is set forth in CAM 1301.70.    **Parent topic:** PART 1335 - RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING
#### § 985.7 Handler.

*Handler* means any person who handles oil.
#### § 932.62 Verification of reports.

For the purpose of checking and verifying reports filed by handlers, the committee, through its duly authorized representatives, shall have access to any handler's premises during regular business hours, and shall be permitted at any such time to: (a) Inspect such premises and any olives held by such handler, and any and all records of the handler with respect to such handler's acquisition, sales, uses and shipments of olives; and (b) inspect any and all records of such handler with respect to advertising and promotion activities subject to § 932.45(a) and maintained by the handler pursuant to § 932.61. Each handler shall furnish all labor and equipment necessary to make such inspections.

[47 FR 51094, Nov. 12, 1982]
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 9 Filed 10/03/2006 Page 1 of 1
120 STAT. 1728 PUBLIC LAW 109–310—OCT. 6, 2006

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 3187:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):

July 20, considered and passed Senate.

Sept. 28, considered and passed House.

Æ

Public Law 109–310

109th Congress

An Act

To designate the Post Office located at 5755 Post Road, East Greenwich, Rhode

Island, as the ‘‘Richard L. Cevoli Post Office’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RICHARD L. CEVOLI POST OFFICE.

(a) DESIGNATION.—The post office located at 5755 Post Road,

East Greenwich, Rhode Island, shall be known and designated

as the ‘‘Richard L. Cevoli Post Office’’.

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation,

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the post

office referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference

to the Richard L. Cevoli Post Office.

Approved October 6, 2006.

Oct. 6, 2006

[S. 3187]
#### § 1016.7 Interpretations.

Except as specifically authorized by the Secretary of Energy in writing, no interpretation of the meaning of the regulations in this part by any officer or employee of DOE other than a written interpretation by the General Counsel will be recognized to be binding upon DOE.
SUBCHAPTER F - SPECIAL CATEGORIES OF

CONTRACTING

PART 334 - MAJOR SYSTEM ACQUISITION

PART 335 - RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING

PART 336 - CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS

PART 337 - SERVICE CONTRACTING - GENERAL

PART 339 - ACQUISITION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

PART 334 - MAJOR SYSTEM ACQUISITION

Subpart 334.2 - Earned Value Management System

334.201 Policy.

334.202 Integrated Baseline Reviews (IBRs).

PART 335 - RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING

335.070 Cost-sharing.

335.070-1 Policy.

335.070-2 Amount of cost-sharing.

335.070-3 Method of cost-sharing.

335.071 [Reserved]

335.072 Key personnel.

PART 336 - CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS

Subpart 336.1 - General

336.104 Policy.

Subpart 336.5 - Contract Clause

336.570 Contract clause.

PART 337 - SERVICE CONTRACTING - GENERAL

Subpart 337.1 - Service Contracts - General

337.103 Contracting officer responsibility.

PART 339 - ACQUISITION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

Subpart 339.1 - General

339.101 Policy

Subpart 339.2 - Electronic and Information Technology

339.203 Applicability.

339.203-70 Contract clauses for electronic and information technology (EIT)

acquisitions.

339.204 Exceptions.

339.204-1 Approval of exceptions.

339.205 Section 508 accessibility standards for contracts.
Subpart 5631.2 - CONTRACTS WITH COMMERCIAL ORGANIZATIONS     **Parent topic:** Part 5631 - CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES5631.205 Selected Costs.     5631.205-32 PreContract Costs.    *(Revised August 2017)*       (a) Pre-Contract cost authorization shall be reviewed by legal counsel and approved by the cognizant HCD or FCO before issuance. As a condition precedent to the use of a pre-contract cost agreement, the correct type of funds must be available upon issuance of the pre-contract cost agreement. Authorization must be in writing and shall address the following:       (i) The necessity for the contractor to initiate work prior to contract award       (ii) The start date of such contractor effort       (iii) The total estimated time of the advanced effort       (iv) The cost limitation       (b) Indicate on the Standard Form 26, Award/Contract, Block 15, and in Section G of any resultant contract the date pre-contract costs were approved. This notifies the payment office that the pre-contract costs are allowable and that the contractor may be reimbursed. The effective date of the contract shall be the date parties reach a bilateral agreement.       (c) Pre-contract cost authorization shall not be used to cover a period in excess of 30 days or $100,000, unless a longer period/larger dollar threshold is approved by the HCA via a written determination and findings that such an allowance is reasonable, and shall not be extended or renewed.       (d) *(Removed August 2017)*.5631.205-46 Travel Costs (Removed August 2017).    HQ, United States Special Operations Command       Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L)       SOFARS 5631       February 2007
# STATEOFLOUISIANA



# COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT

MEYLIN CASTRO, 

### INDIVIDUALLY, NO. 

### 2022 CW 0284 AND ON BEHALF OF HER MINOR CHILDREN, MONICA GISSELL CASTANEDA-GASTRO, DAVID 

### MEDIA-CASTRO, 

### AND DYLAN 

### SNEIJDER MEDIA -GASTRO, AND MEYLIN P. CASTRO VERSUS 

### CHURCH MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF DENHAM SPRINGS, 

### ABC INSURANCE COMPANY, 

### SUNBELT RENTALS SCAFFOLD SERVICES, LLC, XYZ 

### INSURANCE COMPANY, AND 1 PRIORITY ENVIRONMENTAL 

## MARCH 30, 2022 SERVICES, INC.

In Re: 

### 1 

## Priority Environmental Services, Inc. and Sunbelt

Rentals 

### Scaffold Services, 

### LLC, applying for 

### supervisory writs, 

### 19th Judicial District 

### Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 

### 669,445.

BEFORE: GUIDRY, MCCLENDON, WELCH, THERIOT, ANDWOLFE, JJ.

WRIT GRANTED. The portion of the 

### district court' s 

### ruling which allows the video recording of the additional medical examination of plaintiff, Meylin Castro, 

## byJose Lafosse, Ph. D., ABPP, 

### is reversed. 

## In reviewingthewritapplication beforeus, we do not find that the plaintiff has made the required showing of special circumstances to warrant the 

### imposed condition of recording the additional medical examination. 

### Accordingly, the writ 

### is granted and the additional medical examination of plaintiff with Dr. Lafosse 

### is to proceed without video 

### recording. JMG 

### PMc MRT Welch and Wolfe, JJ., 

## dissent andwould denythe writ. The criteria set 

### forth in Herlitz Construction Co., Inc. v. Hotel Investors of New Iberia, Inc., 

### 396 

### So.2d 878 ( La. 1981) ( per curiam) are not met.



### COURT OFAPPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

P CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 2.308 Treatment of requests for hearing or petitions for leave to intervene by the Secretary.

Upon receipt of a request for hearing or a petition to intervene, the Secretary will forward the request or petition and/or proffered contentions and any answers and replies either to the Commission for a ruling on the request/petition and/or proffered contentions or to the Chief Administrative Judge of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel for the designation of a presiding officer under § 2.313(a) to rule on the matter.
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

JAMIE JOHN DUPRE, II

NO. 2022 KW 1003

SEPTEMBER 12, 2022

In Re: Jamie John Dupre, II, applying for supervisory writs, 

32nd Judicial District Court, Parish of Terrebonne, 

No. 831966. 

BEFORE: THERIOT, CHUTZ, AND HESTER, JJ. 

WRIT GRANTED. The trial court' s ruling granting a mistrial

sua sponte is vacated, and this matter is remanded to the trial

court to investigate whether the members of the jury overheard

any comment( s) made by juror number 57. If the court finds that

members of the jury overheard the comment( s) made by juror

number 57, the court is instructed to question the jurors

individually to determine whether the comment( s) would have any

influence on his or her deliberation. See State v. Hills, 2019- 

0466 ( La. App. 1st Cir. 7/ 9/ 19), 2019 WL 3024107. 

MRT

WRC

CHH

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

as' -f-0

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
#### § 983.54 Commingling.

Certified lots may be commingled with other certified lots, but the commingling of certified and uncertified lots shall cause the loss of certification for the commingled lots.

[74 FR 56540, Nov. 2, 2009]
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Mineralresources of the Rich Hole Roadless Area, Alleghany and Rockbridge Counties,Virginia**** 
SuDocNumber:I19.3:1667
ItemNumber:0620(online)
CGPsystem Number:000594866
 
Report
Plate
 **
2814.407-4 Mistakes after award.

The authority to make determinations under FAR 14.407-4 is delegated to the HCA. The HCA may

re-delegate this authority at a level at or above the chief of the contracting office. The determination

must be coordinated with the contracting activity's legal counsel.

Parent topic: Subpart 2814.4 - Opening of Bids and Award of Contract