alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 40589 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
RAUL ELIAS RANGEL

- REYES, also known as Jose Angel De Leon

- Alcala , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:13

- CR

- 126

- 1

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Raul Elias Rangel

Reyes (Rangel) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rangel h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 21 , 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-40589 Document: 00512540122 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2014No. 13

- 40589

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 13-40589 Document: 00512540122 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/21/2014
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 250 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Hepatitis B Awareness Week. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 28, 2005 

Mr. MURPHY (for himself and Mr. HONDA) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Hepatitis B 

Awareness Week. 

Whereas hepatitis B is the most common serious liver infection in the world; 

Whereas chronic hepatitis B infections cause 80 percent of all 

primary liver cancer cases worldwide; 

Whereas 10,000,000 to 30,000,000 people will be infected 

with the hepatitis B virus worldwide in 2005; 

Whereas approximately 100,000 people in the United States 

will become infected with hepatitis B virus this year 

alone; 

Whereas fewer than 10 percent of diagnosed chronic hepatitis 

B patients in the United States are currently receiving 

treatment for their disease; 
2 

•HRES 250 IH 

Whereas healthcare and work loss costs from liver disease 

and liver cancer-caused hepatitis B infections total more 

than $700,000,000 annually; 

Whereas the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

(‘‘CDC’’) estimates that 1,250,000 Americans are already infected with hepatitis B and nearly 6,000 will die 

of liver complications each year; 

Whereas a person who has become infected with hepatitis B 

may not have symptoms for up to 40 years after the initial infection has occurred, and there is currently no routine screening in place for early detection; 

Whereas the CDC has identified African-Americans, AsianAmericans, and Pacific Islanders, as well as Native 

Americans and Alaskan Natives, as having higher rates 

of hepatitis B infection in the United States; 

Whereas Asian-Americans and Pacific Islanders account for 

more than half of the chronic hepatitis B cases and half 

of the deaths resulting from chronic hepatitis B infection 

in the United States; 

Whereas there is a need for a comprehensive public education 

and awareness campaign designed to help infected patients and their physicians identify and manage the secondary prevention of the disease and to help increase the 

length and quality of life for those diagnosed with chronic 

hepatitis B; and 

Whereas the week of May 9, 2005, would be an appropriate 

week to observe National Hepatitis B Awareness Week: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 
3 

•HRES 250 IH 

1 (1) supports the goals and ideals of National 

2 Hepatitis B Awareness Week; 

3 (2) calls upon the people of the United States 

4 to observe the week with appropriate programs and 

5 activities; and 

6 (3) supports raising awareness of the con7 sequences of untreated chronic hepatitis B and the 

8 urgency to seek appropriate care as a serious public 

9 health issue. 

Æ
Subpart 2417.2 - Options

Parent topic: PART 2417 - SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS

2417.204 Contracts.

(e)

(1) The Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) is authorized to approve contract periods for other than

information technology contracts that exceed the 5-year limit set forth at FAR 17.204(e) that are not

otherwise limited by statute (e.g., the Service Contract Act). Except as provided for in paragraphs

(e)(2) and (4) of this section, the SPE shall approve any contract period that will exceed 5 years,

including all option periods, prior to the award of the basic contract.

(2) With regard to HUD indefinite-delivery contracts, the “contract period” requiring the SPE's prior

approval in paragraph (e)(1) of this section shall mean the ordering period of a contract. Unless

otherwise specified within the contract, the 5-year limit shall not apply to the period that any task or

delivery order issued within the contract's ordering period extends beyond the final end date of the

contract's ordering period, regardless of whether the performance period of the order causes the

total period of the contract to exceed 5 years. The issuance of any such task or delivery order does

not require the SPE's approval. Task or delivery orders with end dates extending beyond the

ordering period of the contract may not exceed the final delivery date that the contracting officer

has stated in the applicable indefinite-delivery FAR clause included in the contract (i.e., 52.216-20,

“Definite Quantity,” paragraph (d); 52.216-21, “Requirements,” paragraph (f); or 52.216-22,

“Indefinite Quantity,” paragraph (d)).

(3) The SPE's authority described in paragraphs (e)(1) and (2) of this section shall not be used as the

basis to retroactively increase or extend the period of any existing contract.

(4) The SPE is not required to approve any option properly exercised pursuant to the FAR clause at

52.217-8, “Option to Extend Services,” that extends the contract period beyond 5 years; provided

that the total length of all options exercised pursuant to FAR clause 52.217-8 may not exceed 6

months; and provided that exercise of any such options shall be in accordance with FAR 37.111. Any

proposed extension of a contract beyond the 6-month maximum permitted by FAR 52.217-8 shall be

considered a new requirement and shall be subject to the competition requirements of FAR part 6.
----

**Citizens      Financial Corp.**

**Certification      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley **

**Act      of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

| 1. | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the company for the quarterly period                ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission                on the date hereof (the “report”) fully complies with the requirements of                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | 5/9/07 |   | /s/Robert                J. Schoonover           |   |
|--------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |   | Robert                J. Schoonover              |   |
|   |   |   | President                Chief Executive Officer |   |

----
Part 5642 - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION

AND AUDIT SERVICES

Subpart 5642.2 - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION SERVICES

5642.202 Assignment of Contract Administration.

Subpart 5642.4 - CORRESPSONDENCE AND VISITS

5642.490 Contract Clauses.

Subpart 5642.15 - CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE INFORMATION

5642.1503 Procedures.

Subpart 5642.2 - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION SERVICES

5642.202 Assignment of Contract Administration.

(Revised June 2021)

(a) USSOCOM Directorate of Procurement policy is to transfer all contract administrative

responsibility to the servicing DCMA on all contracts over $350,000 not purchased in accordance

with FAR Part 12 , except where required by statute or excluded from DCMA responsibility.

Exception may be granted by:

(1) Contracting Officer determination to be in the best interest of the organization to retain ACO

responsibilities at the local office.

(2) Determination that it is most effective to transfer only partial responsibility to the DCMA.

The decision should be based on providing the best service to the customer and the capabilities of

the contracting office. Both determinations should be made in writing and maintained in the

contract file.

(b) The transmittal of the contract shall be accomplished in a manner that will provide

documentation of confirmation of receipt by the DCMA office.

(c) (Removed 2017)

Subpart 5642.4 - CORRESPSONDENCE AND VISITS
5642.490 Contract Clauses.

(Added February 2014)

The contracting officer shall insert the clause substantially the same as 5652.242-9002 , Accounting

for Common Access Cards (CACs) for Contractor Personnel Departing HQ USSOCOM, in

solicitations and contracts and or task orders that require contractor personnel to meet one or both

of the following criteria:

(a) Require logical access to Department of Defense computer networks and systems in either the

unclassified environment or the classified environment where authorized by governing security

directives; and/or

(b) Perform work which requires the use of a CAC for installation entry control or physical access to

facilities and buildings.

Subpart 5642.15 - CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE

INFORMATION

5642.1503 Procedures.

(Revised June 2021)

(d)

(1) USSOCOM HCDs and FCOs shall use the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System

( CPARS ) as the method to record evaluations of contractor performance.

(2) Those contractor performance evaluations involving national security/classified contract actions

shall not be entered into CPARS; however, they must follow CPARS reporting requirements in

conjunction with the individual program security requirements.

HQ, United States Special Operations Command

Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L)

SOFARS 5642

February 2007
# Subpart 2822.1 - Basic Labor Policies

**Parent topic:**PART 2822 - APPLICATION OF LABOR LAWS TO GOVERNMENT ACQUISITIONS

## 2822.101 Labor relations.

## 2822.101-70 Domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking.

Contracting officers shall insert the clause, JAR 2852.222-70 Domestic Violence, Sexual Assault, and Stalking, in every written solicitation when services will be performed in whole or in part on DOJ premises.     

## 2822.103 Overtime.

## 2822.103-4 Approvals.

During contract performance, contractor requests for overtime exceeding the amount authorized in paragraph (a) of the clause at FAR 52.222-2, Payment for Overtime Premiums, must be approved at a level above the contracting officer. Such approval should be reflected by the signature of the approving official on the contracting officer's written determination made in accordance with FAR 22.103-4.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 2:06-mj-72-DRB

 )

JOSHUA WAYNE HESTER )

 

MOTION FOR AN EXPEDITED HEARING

Comes now the United States of America, by and through Leura G. Canary, United States

Attorney for the Middle District of Alabama, and respectfully moves for an expedited hearing on its

appeal of the Magistrate Court’s release order of August 2, 2006. In support of its motion, the

government offers the following: 

The Defendant is under indictment for the rape and sodomy of two different children in the

Circuit Court of Elmore County. He has a pending federal criminal complaint before this district for

the production of child pornography. The Magistrate Court has ordered his release pending trial, and

has allowed him to live in the home of two children, ages 12 and 14. The government has filed its

Notice of Appeal of the Magistrate Court’s Release Order. The review of a release order, when

appealed by either party, “shall be determined promptly”. 18 U.S.C. § 3145. See Also United States

v. Fernandez-Alfonso, 813 F. 2d 1571, 1572-1573 (9 Cir. 1987) holding that a delay of 30 days th

between the time of a party’s appeal and a hearing by the district court violates the “promptly”

standard, and suggesting that a 2-3 day standard is more appropriate for such matters. 

Based on the nature of the charges and the immediate concerns for the safety of any person

and the community brought on by the defendant’s release, the government respectfully requests an

expedited hearing in this matter. 

Case 2:06-cr-00193-MEF-CSC Document 10 Filed 08/03/2006 Page 1 of 3
2

For the above-mentioned reasons, the United States respectfully moves for an expedited

hearing on its appeal of the Magistrate Court’s release order of August 2, 2006. 

Respectfully submitted this the 3 day of August, 2006. rdt

LEURA G. CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/ K. David Cooke, Jr.

K. DAVID COOKE, JR.

Assistant United States Attorney

Suite 201, One Court Square

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334) 223-7280

FAX: (334) 223-7280

E-mail: david.cooke@usdoj.gov

Case 2:06-cr-00193-MEF-CSC Document 10 Filed 08/03/2006 Page 2 of 3
3

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 2:06-mj-72-DRB

 )

JOSHUA WAYNE HESTER

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 3, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk

of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following:

Stephen R. Glassroth.

LEURA G. CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/ K. David Cooke, Jr.

K. DAVID COOKE, JR.

Assistant United States Attorney

Suite 201, One Court Square

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334) 223-7280

FAX: (334) 223-7280

E-mail: david.cooke@usdoj.gov

Case 2:06-cr-00193-MEF-CSC Document 10 Filed 08/03/2006 Page 3 of 3
Page 1of 2 

NSPS Fireplace Applicability/Definition Proposal June 6, 2011 

Prepared for HPBA by Bob Ferguson 

Supporting Data 

As was mentioned in the background information section in the June 3, 2011 proposal, the cut 

points for the various parameters that are included in the proposal are based on data. The data is 

quite limited and must be recognized as such but have provided some confirmation for the 

validity of the proposal. In most cases, available data were gathered and analyzed using the 

proposed criteria. These data are from the round-robin test program conducted during the 

development of ASTM E2558, from testing used for qualification to the EPA fireplace program 

or from exemption testing. In one case, new test runs were conducted for the express purpose of 

evaluating the “challenge test” validity. The fire-viewing area data was collected by directly 

surveying eight of the largest producers of fireplaces and/or large heaters in the industry. 

This chart shows all of the flue gas data that was available. It should be noted that the last 

product was tested using EPA Method 28 fuel. This product, although not a fireplace, had an airfuel ratio above 35-to-1, even with the doors closed. Although it was recognized that the E2558 

fueling protocol could result in different average CO2 and CO concentrations, it was felt that this 

product would still maintain a CO2/CO value below 15 due to poor combustion efficiency and 

would not, therefore, be considered a fireplace by the challenge test requirements. 
Page 2of 2 

This chart shows the results of a survey of eight leading manufacturers that produce fireplaces or 

large fireplace-like built-in heaters or both.
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Referenceis hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as ofFebruary 1, 2013, by and among RBS Commercial Funding Inc., as Depositor, WellsFargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, CertificateAdministrator, Tax Administrator and Custodian, Midland Loan Services, adivision of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, Trimont RealEstate Advisors, Inc., as Trust Advisor and U.S. Bank National Association, asTrustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates WFRBS2013-C11 (the “Agreement”). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuantto Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice Presidentof Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.       Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.       To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28thday of February 2018.

 

 

/s/Daniel Bober

DanielBober

ExecutiveVice President

WellsFargo Bank 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo)  Together we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CRIMINAL ACTION NO.

) 2:06cr179-MHT

JOHN TIERCE )

ORDER

It is ORDERED as follows:

(1) The motion to continue sentencing (doc. no. 15)

is granted.

(2) Sentencing for defendant John Tierce now set for

November 1, 2006, is reset for December 14,

2006, at 10:00 a.m. at the Frank M. Johnson, Jr.

United States Courthouse Complex, Courtroom

2FMJ, One Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama

36104.

DONE, this the 25th day of October, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00179-MHT-CSC Document 16 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 1 of 1
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 25, 2017

t0717

Order 

Clerk

July 25, 2017

154551

JOHN HOLETON and PAULINE HOLETON,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v SC: 154551

COA: 321501 

Wayne CC: 14-000104-CZ

CITY OF LIVONIA, LAURA M. TOY,

MAUREEN MILLER BROSNAN, JOHN R.

PASTOR, BRANDON M. KRITZMAN, 

JAMES C. McCANN, JOE LAURA, and

THOMAS A. ROBINSON,

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 2, 2016 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

February 27, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132596 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 132596 

 COA: 272881 

Kent CC: 05-006579-FC 

DESMOND KEAYON JOSEPH 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 13, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l0220 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

February 27, 2007 

 Clerk
| (logo) WELLS            FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

MAC R1204-010 9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia, MD 21045

 

Tel:  410 884-2000

Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation

60 Wall Street 

New York, NY 10005

 

 

RE:  Annual Statement of Compliance

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator and Paying Agent for the Eastview Mall and Commons Mortgage Loan (in such capacity, “Wells Fargo”), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2014 (the “reporting period”):

 

 

(a)      A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the reporting period and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement(s) listed on Schedule A hereto (the “Servicing Agreement(s)”) has been made under my supervision; and

 

(b)     To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material respects throughout the reporting period, except as noted on Schedule B.

 

 

Date: March 4, 2015

 

 

 

\s\ Brian Smith

 

Brian Smith

Vice President

 

 

 

To:  Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation

 

Schedule A

 

 

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series

 

 

Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2012, by and among DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer TORCHLIGHT LOAN SERVICES, LLC, as Special Servicer, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian relating to the Series COMM 2012-CCRE4 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, relating to the Eastview Mall and Commons Mortgage Loan Combination, a pari passu portion of which is included in the Series COMM 2012-CCRE5 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates transaction.

 

 

 

To:  Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation

 

Schedule B

 

 

**Material Non-Compliance****with Servicing Obligations**

 

Not Applicable
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 2 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 2 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 2 of 2