alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 27, 2009 of
Insteel Industries, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
    /s/ Michael C. Gazmarian

     Michael C. GazmarianVice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
§ 20.1302 Compliance with dose limits for individual members of the public. ( a ) The licensee shall make or cause to be made, as appropriate, surveys of radiation levels in unrestricted and controlled areas and radioactive materials in effluents released to unrestricted and controlled areas to demonstrate compliance with the dose limits for individual members of the public in § 20.1301.
( b ) A licensee shall show compliance with the annual dose limit in § 20.1301 by— ( 1 ) Demonstrating by measurement or calculation that the total effective dose equivalent to the individual likely to receive the highest dose from the licensed operation does not exceed the annual dose limit; or
( 2 ) Demonstrating that— ( i ) The annual average concentrations of radioactive material released in gaseous and liquid effluents at the boundary of the unrestricted area do not exceed the values specified in table 2 of appendix B to part 20; and
( ii ) If an individual were continuously present in an unrestricted area, the dose from external sources would not exceed 0.002 rem (0.02 mSv) in an hour and 0.05 rem (0.5 mSv) in a year.
( c ) Upon approval from the Commission, the licensee may adjust the effluent concentration values in appendix B to part 20, table 2, for members of the public, to take into account the actual physical and chemical characteristics of the effluents (e.g., aerosol size distribution, solubility, density, radioactive decay equilibrium, chemical form).
[56 FR 23398, May 21, 1991; 56 FR 61352, Dec. 3, 1991, as amended at 57 FR 57878, Dec. 8, 1992; 60 FR 20185, Apr. 25, 1995]
exv10w3






Exhibit 10.3


February 8, 2010




Mr. Kevin Roach

62 Thompson Mill Road

Newtown, PA 18740




Re: Amendment To Employment Agreement



Dear Kevin,



With respect to that certain Employment Agreement dated September 9, 2008 (“Employment Agreement”)
between you and Activant Solutions Inc. (“Activant”), we hereby agree that the Section entitled
“Relocation” (the “Relocation Section”) is hereby terminated and of no further force or effect. We
further agree that:




     (a) within five (5) business days after the date of your signature below, Activant will pay
you the sum of $200,000, less (i) any amounts previously paid to you or on your behalf by Activant
pursuant to the Relocation Section (other than any “Shipping Costs” as described below), (ii) any
other amounts paid to you or on your behalf by Activant for housing/lodging/rent in or near
Yardley, PA; and (iii) applicable tax withholdings; and



     (b) Activant will reimburse, or pay directly to a moving company, a sum of up to $16,000.00
less the $5,368.17 reimbursed or paid on your behalf to date, for Shipping Costs actually incurred
by you through June 30, 2011, so long as you are still employed by Activant at the time such
Shipping Costs are incurred. Activant will not reimburse or pay for any Shipping Costs incurred
after June 30, 2011. “Shipping Costs” refers to the actual, reasonable cost of shipment of
household items from your home in Cedarsburg, WI to your home in or near Yardley, PA.


If you resign from your employment with Activant for any reason within thirty months following your
Activant employment start date, you agree to reimburse Activant in full for all amounts paid to you
or on your behalf pursuant to this Amendment on your last day of employment with Activant.



Except as modified by this Amendment, the Employment Agreement remains in full force and effect.



Please sign below to confirm your acceptance of the terms of this Amendment.



Sincerely,




	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Pervez Qureshi
	Pervez
Qureshi

President and CEO









I agree to and accept the terms and conditions of this Amendment To Employment Agreement.




	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Kevin
Roach	 	February 8, 2010	 
	Kevin Roach

	 	Date
Exhibit 99.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
OFFICER REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



I, Paul E. Martin, the Principal Financial Officer of Enstar Income Program II-2, L.P. (the "Partnership") in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, the Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission:

- fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/  Paul E. MartinPaul E. MartinChief Financial OfficerNovember 13, 2002
Subpart 2849.1 - General Principles

Parent topic: PART 2849 - TERMINATION OF CONTRACTS

2849.106 Fraud or other criminal conduct.

If the contracting officer has reason to suspect fraud or other criminal conduct related to the

settlement negotiations of a terminated contract, the contracting officer shall discontinue the

negotiations and report the facts supporting the suspicion through the HCA or designee to the OIG.

2849.111 Review of proposed settlements.

The HCA or designee may establish procedures for the review and approval of settlement

agreements at a level above the contracting officer. In addition, all proposed termination settlements

shall be reviewed by legal counsel.
§ 981.31 Membership representation. Membership of the Board will be determined in the following manner: ( a ) Two members and an alternate for each member shall be selected from nominees submitted by each of the following groups designated in paragraphs (a) (1) and (2) of this section, or from among other qualified persons belonging to such groups: ( 1 ) Those growers who market their almonds through cooperative handlers; and
( 2 ) Those growers who market their almonds through other than cooperative handlers.
( b ) Two members and an alternate for each member shall be selected from nominees submitted by each of the following groups designated in paragraphs (b) (1) and (2) of this section, or from among other qualified persons belonging to such groups: ( 1 ) Cooperative handlers; and
( 2 ) All handlers, other than cooperative handlers.
( c ) One member and an alternate shall be selected from nominees submitted by each of the following groups designated in paragraphs (c) (1) and (2) of this section, or from among other qualified persons belonging to such groups: ( 1 ) The group of cooperative handlers or the group of handlers other than cooperative handlers, whichever received for their account more than 50 percent of the almonds delivered by all growers as determined by December 31 of the then current crop year; and
( 2 ) Those growers whose almonds were marketed through the handler group identified in paragraph (c)(1) of this section.
[61 FR 32920, June 26, 1996]
2830.201-5 Waiver.       The SPE is the agency head for the purposes of FAR 30.201-5. Pursuant to FAR 30.201-5, this authority may not be delegated to any official in the agency below the senior contract policymaking level.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2830.2 - CAS Program Requirements
#### In the Matter of F. D. G. Construction Corp., Respondent, v. Jan H. Van Den Hende, as Mayor of the Incorporated Village of Pomona, et al., Appellants.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, made August 16, 1968 in Orange County and entered August 19, 1968 in Rockland County, dismissed as academic, without costs. The judgment was vacated by the order of said court dated November 12, 1968, which granted reargument. Appeal, as limited by appellants’ brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, made November 12, 1968 in Orange County and entered *810November 14, 1968 in Rockland County, as, on reargmnent, adhered to the determination in the judgment entered August 19, 1968. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. No opinion. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 119 Filed 10/26/2007 Page 1 of 13
Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 119 Filed 10/26/2007 Page 2 of 13
Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 119 Filed 10/26/2007 Page 3 of 13
Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 119 Filed 10/26/2007 Page 4 of 13
Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 119 Filed 10/26/2007 Page 5 of 13
Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 119 Filed 10/26/2007 Page 6 of 13
Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 119 Filed 10/26/2007 Page 7 of 13
Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 119 Filed 10/26/2007 Page 8 of 13
Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 119 Filed 10/26/2007 Page 9 of 13
Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 119 Filed 10/26/2007 Page 10 of 13
Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 119 Filed 10/26/2007 Page 11 of 13
Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 119 Filed 10/26/2007 Page 12 of 13
Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 119 Filed 10/26/2007 Page 13 of 13
#### § 983.46 Research.

The committee, with the approval of the Secretary, may establish or provide for the establishment of projects involving research designed to assist or improve the efficient production and postharvest handling of quality pistachios. The committee, with the approval of the Secretary, may also establish or provide for the establishment of projects designed to determine the effects of pistachio consumption on human health and nutrition. Pursuant to § 983.43(a), such research projects may only be established with 12 concurring votes of the voting members of the committee. The expenses of such projects shall be paid from funds collected pursuant to §§ 983.71 and 983.72.

[74 FR 56542, Nov. 2, 2009]
§ 1013.17 Rights of parties. Except as otherwise limited by this part, all parties may— ( a ) Be accompanied, represented, and advised by a representative;
( b ) Participate in any conference held by the ALJ;
( c ) Conduct discovery;
( d ) Agree to stipulations of fact or law, which shall be made part of the record;
( e ) Present evidence relevant to the issues at the hearing;
( f ) Present and cross-examine witnesses;
( g ) Present oral arguments at the hearing as permitted by the ALJ; and
( h ) Submit written briefs and proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law.
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 78 FR 34247, June 7, 2013.

§ 1.32 Office of the Executive Director for Operations. ( a ) The Executive Director for Operations (EDO) reports for all matters to the Chairman, and is subject to the supervision and direction of the Chairman as provided in Reorganization Plan No. 1 of 1980.
( b ) The EDO supervises and coordinates policy development and operational activities in the following offices: The Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, the Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, the Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, the Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response, and the NRC Regional Offices; and the following staff offices: The Office of Enforcement, the Office of Administration, the Office of the Chief Information Officer, the Office of Investigations, the Office of Small Business and Civil Rights, the Office of the Chief Human Capital Officer, and other organizational units as shall be assigned by the Commission. The EDO is also responsible for implementing the Commission's policy directives pertaining to these offices.
( c ) The EDO exercises powers and functions delegated to the EDO under the Reorganization Plan No. 1 of 1980, this chapter, or otherwise by the Commission or Chairman, as appropriate. The EDO has the authority to perform any function that may be performed by an office director reporting to the EDO.
[54 FR 53314, Dec. 28, 1989, as amended at 59 FR 63882, Dec. 12, 1994. Redesignated and amended at 63 FR 15741, Apr. 1, 1998; 67 FR 3585, Jan. 25, 2002; 70 FR 69421, Nov. 16, 2005; 73 FR 5711, Jan. 31, 2008; 78 FR 34247, June 7, 2013; 79 FR 75737, Dec. 19, 2014; 80 FR 74978, Dec. 1, 2015; 84 FR 65643, Nov. 29, 2019]
Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 33 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### § 987.35 Modifications.

In the event the Committee subsequently determines that the marketing policy should be modified due to changing supply or demand conditions, it shall formulate and submit to the Secretary its modified marketing policy along with the data which it considered in connection with such modification.
#### Edwards *et al. v.*Town of Guyton *et al.*

August 14, 1913.

Beck, J.

1. Where a judge of the superior court has rendered judgment confirming and validating the issuance of bonds by a municipality, under the provisions of the Civil Code, §§ 445-447, and no bill of exceptions assigning error upon such judgment is filed within twenty days from the date thereof for the purpose of carrying the questions raised in the proceedings to validate the bonds to the Supreme Court, then, under the provisions of section 448 of the Civil Code, “the judgment ,of the superior court so confirming and validating the issuance of the bonds shall be forever conclusive upon the validity of the bonds against the . . municipality, . . ' and the validity of the bonds shall never be called in question in any court in this State.” Consequently, after the validation of certain municipal bonds, as recited above, no writ of error to the judgment validating the same having been sued out within the time prescribed by law, it was not error for the court below to refuse to enjoin the issuance of said bonds at the suit of certain taxpayers of the town issuing the bonds, upon the ground that the town was not authorized “to establish a system of waterworks in the town, nor a' system of electric lights in the town,” the construction and installation of the system of waterworks and electric lights in the town being the objects to which the proceeds of the bonds were to be applied. *Epping*v. *City of Columbus,*117 *Ga.*263 (43 S. E. 803); *Holton*v. *City of Camilla,*134 *Ga.*560 (68 S. E. 472, 31 L. R. A. (N. S.) 116, 20 Ann. Cas. 199); *Baker*v. *City of Cartersville,*127 *Ga.*221 (56 S. E. 249). Whether the ground set forth in the petition for injunction, that “the levy of a tax to pay the interest and principal of the bonds will require the levy of a tax in excess of the rate of one fourth of one per cent., the limit of the taxing power of the municipality as fixed by its charter,” would be a good ground for injunction, is not decided, as the evidence did not require a finding that a levy of a tax sufficient to pay the interest and principal of the bonds would exceed the charter limit.

2. Questions as to the constitutionality of the code sections cited, relative to the validation of bonds issued by a municipality, which were not raised at the hearing of the petition for injunction and upon which no • ruling was invoked in the court below, will not be considered in this court. . *Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.*

*554Effingham Petition for injunction. Before Judge Sheppard, superior court. June 6, 1913.

*George E. Richter,*for plaintiffs.

*Clarence 8. Guyton,*for defendants.
# 2453.246 Quality Assurance.

**Parent topic:**Subpart 2453.2 - Prescription of Forms
#### PEOPLE v. LEVIN.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October *113512, 1906.)

Proceedings by the people of the state of New York against Louis Levin.

No opinion. Motion denied. Order filed.
Case 2:06-cv-00725-MHT-CSC Document 8 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 1 of 1
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Behavior ChangeBehavior DisordersClassroom EnvironmentClassroom TechniquesDisabilitiesInterventionPositive ReinforcementResearch and DevelopmentTeaching MethodsTeaching ModelsTheory Practice Relationship

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Identifiers - Laws, Policies, & Programs:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
# L_2014291EN.01001901.xml

| 7.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 291/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 291/19

---

Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 906/2014 of 11 March 2014 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to public intervention expenditure

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 255 of 28 August 2014
  )

On page 5, Annex I, part I, point 2, in the last paragraph:

for:

‘...referred to in point (a)...’,

read:

‘...referred to in point 1...’;

On page 5, Annex I, part I, point 3, first paragraph:

for:

‘...the provisions of point (b)...’,

read:

‘...the provisions of point 2...’;

On page 5, Annex I, part I, point 3, first paragraph:

for:

‘...the provisions of point (a).’,

read:

‘...the provisions of point 1.’.

---
Rallroad Carmrlaelc~ of Texae

Auetln,Texae oentlweut 

### oplIllal lo. o-3824 Rer Memberof laglelature holding 8n offloe II&

i&e Rxwntlre mp.staent Of'

the state gorsnuwut, whloh offlaewa8 createdbytie Le@lature of which the Legislatorwae a member. 

### lie have for whunrbQmaent 

### ywr lmtterof 

### Jdy 28, 191, which readB a8 follolmr

"Mayamember of the bgielatum lawfully eoceptand holdenoffioe in theIkeoutireDepar+awntof thestate Covermwt, in 8u admlnietratlve capeclty,wherethemmey to pay the ealmy luoldent to the offloewas appro~iated by a b&datura ofvhiohsaldpereoawae a~ matireend perticipatlng

member, -the offloeharin~beenoreatAdand eetabllehed,

80 fai- ea a creationti estibliehmeiit ever oeme &o&by aald eama Legislature ofvhloh ealdaember w88 8n aotivemd pa-tloipat~ 

### m8mberP
You referne tono partlaalar fecteituat.im,bnt it eeme ae qneetim whioh yun desireto wk may be statedae follower

Way a mwber of the bglelature laufally acceptaud hold m office in ths Exwatlrs Department of the State Comnunent,vhmioh

offloewae ereatedby the Leglelature of whloh eald Legti~lator NW a memberZm 

### Articl8

3, Seotlm 18, of the State Conetltuticm, reads in psrt (LB ~fOu.oml

l~Senat.ororBepreeentatire&all.,during the tea for vhlchhe may be eleoted, be 

### eligible

to w ciriloffloe ofprofltunder tbie State,whloh ehall havebeenmealxd,or the QQlmnanta ofwhlchmc.y havebeen Increased duringauoh telmi

. . ."Ballxoad 0orias1aI of TezM, Pa&l. 2 (0-3i324)

mRovEDAu61,lg41 /a/ Cnwer Sellam APPEovEDoPm~ C- BY /e/.]B.W.B. CRAmNAn ;.,

L
Page 1 of 1 REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE CoreLogic  Commercial  Real  Estate  Services,  Inc.  (the  "Asserting  Party"),  an  indirect subsidiary of CoreLogic, Inc, is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2012,  and  for  the  period  from  January  1,  2012  through  December  31,  2012  (the "Reporting  Period")  with  the  servicing  criteria  set  forth  in  Title  17,  Sections 229.1122(d)(1)(iv), (d)(2)(v), (d)(2)(vi), (d)(2)(vii), (d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii) and (d)(4)(xiii) of  the  Code  of  Federal  Regulations  applicable  to  the  Asserting  Party  (the  "Applicable Servicing Criteria"). The servicing activities covered by this report include all loans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Asserting Party served as the commercial tax service provider (the "Platform"). The  Asserting  Party  has  assessed  its compliance with  the  Applicable  Servicing  Criteria  for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects,  with  the  Applicable  Servicing  Criteria  as  of  December  31,  2012,  and  for  the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform taken as a whole. PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP,  an  independent  registered  public  accounting  firm,  has issued  an  attestation  report  on  the  assessment  of  compliance  with  the  Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2012, and for the Reporting Period. CORELOGIC COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE SERVICES, INC. /s/ Vicki ChenaultVicki Chenault Senior Vice President February 6, 2013
# Subpart 1322.1 - Basic Labor Policies

**Parent topic:**PART 1322 - APPLICATION OF LABOR LAWS TO GOVERNMENT ACQUISITIONS

## 1322.101 Labor relations.

## 1322.101-1 General.

The designee authorized to designate programs or requirements for contractors notifying the Government of actual or potential labor disputes is set forth in CAM 1301.70.   

## 1322.101-3 Reporting labor disputes.

(a) The designee authorized to report any potential or actual labor disputes that may interfere with performing any contracts under its cognizance is designated in CAM 1301.70. 

(b) The contracting officer shall seek legal advice and assistance from Procurement Counsel when a potential or actual labor dispute that may interfere with the contract performance occurs.   

## 1322.101-4 Removal of items from contractors' facilities affected by work stoppages.

The contracting officer shall obtain approval from the head of the contracting office and seek legal advice before initiating any action in accordance with FAR 22.101-4.   

## 1322.103 Overtime.

## 1322.103-4 Approvals.

Approval of use of overtime may be granted by the approving official as set forth in CAM 1301.70.