alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 110.125 Unclassified statements required. ( a ) It is the obligation of hearing participants to introduce information in unclassified form wherever possible, and to declassify, to the maximum extent feasible, any classified information introduced into the hearing. This obligation rests on each participant whether or not any other participant has the required security clearances.
( b ) When classified information is offered for introduction into a hearing: ( 1 ) The participant offering it shall, to the extent consistent with classification requirements, submit to the presiding officer and other participants an unclassified statement describing the substance of the classified information as accurately and completely as possible;
( 2 ) In accordance with procedures agreed upon by the participants or prescribed by the presiding officer, and after notice to all participants and opportunity to be heard on the notice, the presiding officer will determine whether an unclassified statement may be substituted for the classified information in the hearing record without prejudice to the interest of any participant or the public;
( 3 ) If the Commission determines that the unclassified statement (together with such unclassified modifications as it finds are necessary or appropriate to protect the interest of other participants and the public) adequately sets forth information in the classified matter which is relevant and material to the issues in the hearing, it will direct that the classified matter be excluded from the record of the hearing; and
( 4 ) The Commission may postpone any of the procedures in this section until all other evidence has been received. However, a participant shall not postpone service of any unclassified statement required in this section.
#### § 1015.108 No private rights created.

The standards in this part do not create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by a party against the United States, its agencies, its officers, or any other person, nor shall the failure of DOE, Treasury, the DOJ or other agency to comply with any of the provisions of this part be available to any debtor as a defense.
COURTROOM DEPUTY MINUTES DATE: AUGUST 23, 2006 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

DIGITAL RECORDING: 11:04 - 11:13 

/ INITIAL APPEARANCE

 DETENTION HEARING 

 REMOVAL HEARING (Rule 5) 

/ ARRAIGNMENT 

 ARRAIGNMENT on SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT 

 PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION 

PRESIDING MAG. JUDGE CHARLES S. COODY DEPUTY CLERK: WANDA STINSON 

CASE NO. 2:06CR203-MHT-CSC DEFT. NAME: JOSEPH STRINGER

USA: CHRISTOPHER SNYDER ATTY: ROBIN CONRDAD 

Type Counsel: ( ) Retained; ( ) Panel CJA; ( ) Waived; ( / ) CDO ;

USPTSO/ USPO: RON THWEATT/ SANDRA WOODS 

Defendant does / does NOT need an interpreter; NAME: 

/Kars. Date of Arrest 8/23/06 or  Rule 5 Arrest

/kia. Deft. First Appearance. Advised of rights/charges.  Pro/Sup Rel Violator

/ Finaff. Financial Affidavit executed  to be obtained by PTS; / ORAL Motion for Appt. Of Counsel. 

/ koappted ORAL ORDER appointing Federal Defender - Notice to be filed.

20appt. Panel Attorney Appointed;  to be appointed - prepare voucher

 Deft. Advises he will retain counsel. Has retained 

 Government’ s ORAL (kgoralm.) Motion for Detention Hrg.  To be followed by written motion;

 Government’ sWRITTEN Motion for Detention Hrg. filed. 

 DETENTION HRG  held;  Set for ;  Prelim. Hrg  Set for 

 kotempdtn. ORDER OF TEMPORARY DETENTION PENDING HEARING entered

kodtn. ORDER OF DETENTION PENDING TRIAL entered

/ kocondrls. Release order entered.  Deft. advised of conditions of release.

/kbnd. / BOND EXECUTED (M/D AL charges) $ 25,000 Deft released (kloc LR)

 BOND EXECUTED (R.5 charges) - deft to report to originating district as ordered

 Loc.(LC) Bond NOT executed. Deft to remain in Marshal’ s custody

 ko. Deft. ORDERED REMOVED to originating district

 krmvhrg. Identity/Removal Hearing  set for _________;  WAIVER of Rule 5 & 5.1 Hearings

 kwvprl. Waiver of Preliminary hearing; 

 Court findsPROBABLE CAUSE. Defendant bound over to the Grand Jury.

/Karr. ARRAIGNMENT SET FOR: / HELD. Plea of NOT GUILTY entered. 

 / Trial Term 10/30/06 ; / PRETRIAL CONFERENCE DATE: 9/25/06 

/ DISCOVERY DISCLOSURES DATE: 8/23/06 

 Krmknn. NOTICEto retained Criminal Defense Attorney handed to Counsel

 Kwvspt Waiver of Speedy Trial Act Rights Executed. 

Case 2:06-cr-00203-MHT-CSC Document 5 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

________________________ DIVISION

_________________________________, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. __________________

)

_________________________________, )

)

Defendants, )

CONFLICT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

COMES NOW ___________________, a in the above-captioned

matter, and in accordance with the order of this Court, making the following disclosure

concerning parent companies, subsidiaries, partners, limited liability entity members and

managers, trustees (but not trust beneficiaries), affiliates, or similar entities reportable under

the provisions of the Middle District of Alabama’s General Order No. 3047:

This party is an individual, or

This party is a governmental entity, or

There are no entities to be reported, or

The following entities and their relationship to the party are hereby reported:

Reportable Entity Relationship to Party

________________________________ _________________________________

________________________________ _________________________________

________________________________ _________________________________

________________________________ _________________________________

 

Date (Signature)

 

(Counsel’s Name)

 

Counsel for (print names of all parties)

 

Address, City, State Zip Code

 

Telephone Number

Case 1:06-cv-00659-CSC Document 31 Filed 07/11/2007 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

________________________ DIVISION

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I,____________________________________, do hereby Certify that a true and correct copy

of the foregoing has been furnished by ___________________________(manner of service,

i.e., U.S. Mail, electronic mail, etc.) on this _______day of ____________ 20__, to:

 

 

 

Date Signature

Case 1:06-cv-00659-CSC Document 31 Filed 07/11/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### The People of the State of New York; Respondent, v. Joseph Edward Ainsworth, Appellant.

Judgement of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered December 27, 1968 on resentence, affirmed. The Parole *840Board ¡has broad power to decide when a prisoner serving a sentence like the one here imposed is fit for release to the community; and the board may require psychiatric care as a condition of parole if it deems such condition advisable. Christ, Acting P. J., Benjamin, Martuseello and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur; Munder, J., not voting.
#### Irene L. Meyers et al., Appellants, v. New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, Defendant, and Incorporated Village of Rockville Centre, Respondent.

Appeal by plaintiffs from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered November 19, 1968, which granted defendant Incorporated Village of Rockville Centre’s motion to change the place of trial of the action from New York County to Nassau County on the ground that the county designated by plaintiffs was improper. Order reversed, on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, without prejudice to renewal thereof in a proper county. In response to respondent village's demand for a change of venue from New York County to Nassau County, appellants timely served an affidavit alleging New York County to be proper in that defendant New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal *“*has principal offices ” within that county. The village thereafter made the motion in Nassau County for the change of venue. Were appellants proceeding against defendant New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal alone, venue could properly be laid in New York County (CPLR 505, subd. [a]). However, actions against villages are to be brought in the county where the village is situated (CPLR 504, subd. 2; Village Law, § 341-e). As a result of the joinder of parties defendant, there is a conflict in the venue provisions. Under the circumstances, “ the court, upon motion, shall order as the place of trial one proper under this article as to at least one of the parties ” (CPLR 502). Irrespective of the issue as to how this conflict is ultimately to be resolved, the mere service of the affidavit by appellants (which clearly tended to support their choice of venue) was sufficient to preclude respondent village from moving in Nassau County; and the motion herein should properly have been made returnable in New York County (CPLR 511, subd. [b]; *Chuttick*v. *Collins,*20 A D 2d 640; *Ludlow Valve Mfg. Co.*v. *S. S. Silberblatt, Inc.,*14 *819A D 2d 291). In our opinion, *Payne*v. *Civil Serv. Employees Assn.*(15 A D 2d 265) is not to the contrary. Rabin, Acting P. J., Benjamin, Munder, Martuscello and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 22

- 00005

- CV
ELIAZAR COSTILLA, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS THE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF KRISTY RENEE COSTILLA, DECEASED, AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF A.J.C. AND C.K.C, MINORS; MELINDA RODRIGUEZ LEAL AND CAMILO TREVINO v. ATI YA DHALA, M.D.
On Appeal from the 197th District Court of Cameron County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2022

- DCL

- 00053

- C

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed in part and reversed in part, and the case should be remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED IN PART and REVERSED IN PART, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant s

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. November 2, 2023
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 134

Requesting the President to transmit to the House of Representatives certain 

information relating to plan assets and liabilities of single-employer pension plans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 2, 2005

Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California submitted the following resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION

Requesting the President to transmit to the House of Representatives certain information relating to plan assets 

and liabilities of single-employer pension plans.

1 Resolved, That the President is hereby requested to 

2 transmit to the House of Representatives, not later than 

3 14 days after the date of the adoption of this resolution, 

4 copies of all information in his possession relating to the 

5 2 most recent plan years of single-employer pension plans 

6 preceding the date of the adoption of this resolution, con7 sisting of—
2

•HRES 134 IH 

1 (1) information described in paragraphs (1) and 

2 (2) of section 4010.8(a) of title 29, Code of Federal 

3 Regulations, with respect to such plans, and 

4 (2) the identity of the contributing sponsors of 

5 such plans.

Æ
#### § 1304.116 Mailing lists.

The Board shall not sell or rent an individual's name and/or address unless such action is specifically authorized by law. This section shall not be construed to require the withholding of names and addresses otherwise permitted to be made public.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3452 

To modify the provisions of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 

States relating to returned property. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 6, 2006 

Mrs. MURRAY (for herself and Ms. CANTWELL) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To modify the provisions of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule 

of the United States relating to returned property. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF PROVISIONS RELATING TO 

4 RETURNED PROPERTY. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The article description for sub6 heading 9801.00.10 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 

7 the United States is amended by inserting ‘‘, or products 

8 previously exported from the United States if returned 

9 within 3 years of being exported,’’ after ‘‘exported’’. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•S 3452 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

WHITNEY LOSTON

NO. 2023 KW 0905

DECEMBER 4, 2023

In Re: Whitney Loston, applying for supervisory writs, 16th

Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Mary, Nos. 

2009- 181129/ 03- 162554. 

BEFORE: McCLENDON, HESTER, AND MILLER, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED ON THE SHOWING MADE. Relator failed to include

the resentencing minute entries and/ or the transcript, his bill

of information, the uniform commitment order, any pertinent

minute entries, and other portions of the district court record

that might support the claims raised in the writ application. 

Supplementation of this writ application and/ or an application

for rehearing will not be considered. See Uniform Rules of

Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 2- 18. 7 & 4- 9. Any future

filing on this issue should include the entire contents of this

application, the missing items noted above, and a

copy of this

ruling. 

It is noted that as an indigent inmate, relator is entitled

to receive certain court documents, such as the guilty plea

transcript, the bill of information or indictment, the

commitment papers, the court minutes for various portions of the

trial, and the minutes of his sentencing, free of charge without

the necessity of establishing a particularized need. See State

ex rel. Simmons v. State, 93- 0275 ( La. 12/ 16/ 94), 647 So. 2d

1094, 1095 ( per curiam). As to all other documents, an indigent

inmate has the constitutional right to free copies only in those

instances in which he shows that denial of the request will

deprive him of an adequate opportunity to present his claims

fairly. Meeting that constitutional threshold requires a

showing of a particularized need. An inmate therefore cannot

make a

showing of particularized need absent a properly filed

application for postconviction relief, which sets out specific

claims of constitutional errors requiring the requested

documentation for support. See State ex rel. Bernard v. 

Criminal District Court Section " J", 94- 2247 ( La. 4/ 28/ 95), 653

So. 2d 1174, 1175 ( per curiam). 

PMC

CHH

SMM

OURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

PUTY CLERK OF COURT

i FOR THE COURT
162 So.2d 571

#### Marvin W. McKELLAR, Sr., Individually and for Michael McKellar, v. Wallace H. MASON and Lumbermen’s Mutual Casualty Company.

No. 47165.

April 17, 1964.

In re: Marvin W. McKeiiar, Sr., etc., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 159 So.2d 700.

The application is denied. According to the facts of the case, as found to be by the Court of Appeal, the result reached by the Court is correct.

SANDERS and SUMMERS, JJ., are of the opinion the writ should be granted for the reasons assigned in the dissenting opinion of Samuel, J., 159 So.2d 700, 705.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 188 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         April 6, 2005.
Whereas in 1736 Benjamin Franklin founded the Union Fire Company, the first 
        volunteer fire company;
Whereas there are more than 1,100,000 firefighters in the United States;
Whereas approximately 75 percent of all firefighters are volunteers who receive 
        little or no compensation for their heroic work;
Whereas career and combination fire departments protect 3 out of 4 Americans;
Whereas there are more than 30,000 fire departments in the United States;
Whereas approximately 100 firefighters die in the line of duty each year;
Whereas more than 340 firefighters died responding to the terrorist attacks on 
        September 11, 2001;
Whereas firefighters respond to more than 24,000,000 calls during an average 
        year;
Whereas firefighters also provide emergency medical services and life safety 
        education; and
Whereas it is estimated that on April 7, 2005, more than 2,000 firefighters will 
        attend the 17th Annual National Fire and Emergency Services Dinner and 
        Seminars: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors and recognizes the more 
than 1,100,000 firefighters in the United States for their contributions to and 
sacrifice for the Nation.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

OWEN J. ROGAL, D.D.S., P.C., 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

SKILSTAF, INC., 

 Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

 CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06-cv-00728-VPM 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

Charles A. Stewart III, Amelia T. Driscoll, and the law firm of Bradley Arant Rose & 

White LLP, hereby give notice of appearance as counsel for Skilstaf, Inc., the Defendant in this 

cause, and ask that the Court and Plaintiff serve them with copies of all pleadings, orders, 

discovery, and other documents at the below address: 

Charles A. Stewart III 

Bradley Arant Rose & White LLP 

The Alabama Center for Commerce 

401 Adams Avenue, Suite 780 

Montgomery, AL 36104 

Amelia Driscoll (DRI016) 

Bradley Arant Rose & White LLP 

One Federal Place 

1819 Fifth Avenue North 

Birmingham, AL 35203 

Dated this the 18th day of August, 2005. 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Charles A. Stewart, III 

Charles A. Stewart, III (STE067) (asb-4955-a56c) 

Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 14 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

Bradley Arant Rose & White LLP

The Alabama Center for Commerce 

401 Adams Avenue, Suite 780 

Montgomery, AL 36104 

Telephone: (334) 956-7700 

Facsimile: (334) 956-7701 

Email: cstewart@bradleyarant.com 

Amelia T. Driscoll 

Bradley Arant Rose & White LLP 

One Federal Place 

1819 Fifth Avenue North 

Birmingham, AL 35203 

Phone: (205)521-8000 

Fax: (205)521-8800 

Email: adriscoll@bradleyarant.com 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Bama Budweiser, Inc. of Montgomery 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 18, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with the 

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to the 

following: 

Robert E. Cole 

437 Chestnut Street, Suite 218 

Philadelphia, PA 19109 

Beth A. Friel 

Jeanne L. Bakker 

Mongtomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads 

123 South Broad Street 

Philadelphia, PA 19109 

and I hereby certify that I have mailed by U. S. Postal Service the document to the following 

non-CM/ECF participants: None. 

/s/ Charles A. Stewart, III 

1/1353304.1

Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 14 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00739-LES-CSC Document 8 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00739-LES-CSC Document 8 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 356 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 356

To direct the Secretary of the Army to convey to the Geary County Fire 
            Department certain land in the State of Kansas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 10, 2005

 Mr. Brownback (for himself and Mr. Roberts) introduced the following 
   bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of the Army to convey to the Geary County Fire 
            Department certain land in the State of Kansas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Geary County, Kansas, Land 
Conveyance Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Fire department.--The term ``Fire Department'' means 
        the Geary County Fire Department, Milford, Kansas.
            (2) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of the Army.

SEC. 3. CONVEYANCE OF LAND TO GEARY COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT, KANSAS.

    (a) In General.--Subject to subsections (b), (c), and (d), the 
Secretary shall convey to the Fire Department, by quitclaim deed and 
without consideration, all right, title, and interest of the United 
States in and to the parcel of land described in subsection (b)(1).
    (b) Description of Land.--
            (1) In general.--The parcel of land referred to in 
        subsection (a) is the approximately 7.4 acres of land under the 
        jurisdiction of the Secretary located in Geary County, Kansas.
            (2) Survey.--The exact acreage and a legal description of 
        the parcel of land described in paragraph (1) shall be 
        determined by a survey that is satisfactory to the Secretary.
    (c) Use of Land.--The parcel of land conveyed under subsection (a) 
shall be used by the Fire Department for the construction, operation, 
and maintenance of a fire station.
    (d) Reversion.--At the option of the Secretary, all right, title, 
and interest in and to the parcel of land conveyed under subsection (a) 
shall revert to the United States, if the Secretary determines that the 
parcel of land is no longer--
            (1) held in public ownership; or
            (2) used for the purpose described in subsection (c).
                                 <all>
```
H. Res. 169 

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

June 7, 2005. 

Whereas Americans of all ages cherish the pleasures of outdoor activities, and too few recognize that overexposure 

to the sun and its ultraviolet radiation, classified by the 

Department of Health and Human Services as a known 

carcinogen, is the leading cause of skin cancer; 

Whereas it is critically important to be safe in the sun because skin cancer is the fastest growing cancer in our 

country today, affecting 1 in 5 Americans during their 

lifetimes and killing 1 person every hour of every day; 

Whereas more than 1,000,000 new cases of skin cancer will 

be diagnosed in the United States this year, accounting 

for nearly half of all new cases of cancer and exceeding 

the incidence of breast, prostate, lung, and colon cancer 

combined; 

Whereas most people receive approximately 80 percent of 

their lifetime sun exposure by age 18, setting the stage 

for skin cancer later in life; 

Whereas skin cancer is highly preventable by taking simple 

precautions when engaged in outdoor activities; 

Whereas research demonstrates that practicing good sun 

safety has the potential to significantly reduce the risk of 

skin cancer; 
2 

•HRES 169 EH 

Whereas the Sun Safety Alliance and its members have dedicated themselves to promoting sun safety, eliminating 

skin cancer from excessive sun exposure, and encouraging 

sun protection practices, especially among children; and 

Whereas the Sun Safety Alliance has designated the week of 

June 5, 2005, to June 11, 2005, as National Sun Safety 

Week: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) recognizes the importance of sun safety; 

(2) encourages all Americans to protect themselves 

and their children from the dangers of excessive sun exposure; 

(3) congratulates organizations like the Sun Safety 

Alliance for their efforts to promote sun safety and prevent skin cancer; and 

(4) supports the goals and ideals of National Sun 

Safety Week. 

Attest: 

Clerk.