alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014186EN.01000501.xml

| 18.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 186/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 186/5

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 12 June 2014

appointing the members and alternate members of the Governing Board of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work for France

2014/C 186/06

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2062/94 of 18 July 1994 establishing a European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (1), and in particular Article 8 thereof,

1

Having regard to the list of candidates submitted to the Council by the Governments of the Member States and by the employees’ and the employers’ organisations,

Having regard to the lists of members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work,

Whereas:

| (1) | By its Decision of 2 December 2013 (2) the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Governing Board of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work for the period ending on 7 November 2016. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By its Decision of 2 December 2013 (2) the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Governing Board of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work for the period ending on 7 November 2016.

2

| (2) | The employers’ organisation BUSINESSEUROPE has submitted nominations for two posts to be filled, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The employers’ organisation BUSINESSEUROPE has submitted nominations for two posts to be filled,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following shall be appointed members and alternate members of the Governing Board of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work for the period ending on 7 November 2016:

III.   REPRESENTATIVES OF EMPLOYERS’ ORGANISATIONS

| Country | Member | Alternate member |
| --- | --- | --- |
| France | Ms Nathalie BUET | Mr Patrick LÉVY |

Country

Member

Alternate member

France

Ms Nathalie BUET

Mr Patrick LÉVY

Article 2

The Council will appoint the members and alternate members who have not yet been nominated at a later date.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 12 June 2014.

For the Council

The President

Y. MANIATIS

---

(1)  OJ L 216, 20.8.1994, p. 1.

1

(2)  Council Decision 2013/C 360/07 of 2 December 2013 appointing the members and alternate members of the Governing Board of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (OJ C 360, 10.12.2013, p. 8).

2

---
REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION'S REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA For the calendar year ending December 31, 2012, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for **Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.**(the "Servicer")**.**National Tax Search, LLC ("NTS") is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2012 and for the  period  from  January  1,  2012  through  December  31,  2012  (the  "Reporting  Period")  with  the  servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the "CFR"). NTS has used  the  servicing  criteria  communicated  to  NTS  by  the  Servicer  to  assess  compliance  with  the  applicable servicing  criteria.  Only  servicing  criteria  1122  (d)  (l)(ii),  1122  (d)1(iv),  1122  (d)2(ii),  1122  (d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi),  1122  (d)2(vii),  1122(d)(4)(xi),  and  1122(d)(4)(xii)  (the  "Applicable  Servicing  Criteria")  are applicable  to  the  activities  NTS  performs  with  respect  to  the  transactions  covered  by  this  report.  NTS  has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. The transactions covered by this report include all tax payments made on behalf of the Servicer using NTS's TaxQ system (the "Platform Transactions"). NTS, as a vendor, has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the NTS has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2012 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform Transactions taken as a whole. Plante & Moran, PLLC, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2012 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion. National Tax Search, LLC, as Vendor to Servicer /s/ Lori D. Eshoo Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

RAMON MENDEZ,

Petitioner

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND 

JOHN E. WETZEL, ET AL.,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 72 EM 2020

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of December, 2020, the “Application for Leave to File 

Reargument Nunc Pro Tunc” is DENIED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

M.C., who sues by and through her )

mother and next friend, GAIL TATUM, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv83-LES

) (LEAD CASE)

PACTIV CORPORATION, et al, )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

On July 12, 2006, the court ordered the following cases consolidated for all pretrial

proceedings governed by FED. R. CIV. P. 26 through 27. 

2:06cv83-LES, M.C. v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv84-LES, Phillips v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv85-LES, Thompson v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv86-LES, Edwards v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv186-LES, Madden v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv187-LES, Davis v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv188-LES, Douglas v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv189-LES, Thompson v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv190-LES, Kelley v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv191-LES, Cravey v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

See Doc. # 59. 

Since that date, mediation has been unsuccessful and the following additional cases have

been filed. 

2:06cv660-LES, Adams, et al., v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv679-LES, Cassady, et al. v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv680-LES, Brooks, et al. v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv739-LES, Anderson et al., v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv757-LES, Harrison, et al., v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv758-LES, Lawrence, et al., v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

Case 2:06-cv-00739-LES-CSC Document 11 Filed 10/19/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

2:06cv759-LES, Hamilton v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv904-LES, K.C. et al., v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

At this juncture, it appears that all of these cases should be consolidated for all pretrial

proceedings; provided, however, that at a later date, the court may unconsolidate these cases

should it become necessary. Accordingly, for good cause, it is

ORDERED that the afore-referenced cases be and are hereby CONSOLIDATED for all

pretrial proceedings. It is further

ORDERED that the above-styled case be and is hereby DESIGNATED as LEAD case,

and that all pleadings shall be filed only in the lead case.

The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to docket and place a copy of this order in each

case file referenced herein.

Counsel are reminded of M.D. ALA. LR 5.1 which governs the filing of discovery

materials in this district.

Done this 19 day of October, 2006. th

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00739-LES-CSC Document 11 Filed 10/19/2006 Page 2 of 2
5129.303 Application of state and local taxes

to government contractors and

subcontractors.

(a) The Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology) shall perform the

review as set forth in FAR 29.303(a). See Appendix GG for further delegation.

Parent topic: Subpart 5129.3 - State and Local Taxes
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 2.1308 Oral hearings.

Hearings under this subpart will be oral hearings, unless, within 15 days of the service of the notice or order granting the hearing, the parties unanimously agree and file a joint motion requesting a hearing consisting of written comments. No motion to hold a hearing consisting of written comments will be entertained absent consent of all the parties.

[69 FR 2270, Jan. 14, 2004]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 141 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 141

            Honoring the life of Enrique ``Kiki'' Camarena.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 2005

 Mr. Hunter submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
            Honoring the life of Enrique ``Kiki'' Camarena.

Whereas Enrique Camarena, a Special Agent of the Drug Enforcement Administration 
        for 11 years, was abducted and brutally murdered by drug barons in 1985;
Whereas Enrique Camarena dedicated his life to serving the law enforcement 
        community and the nation as a whole and was the devoted husband of 
        Geneva Alvarado and loving father of Enrique, Daniel, and Eric;
Whereas Enrique Camarena received two Sustained Superior Performance Awards and 
        a Special Achievement Award while serving the Drug Enforcement 
        Administration;
Whereas Enrique Camarena's dedication to reducing the scourge of drugs 
        eventually cost him his life;
Whereas ``Camarena Clubs'' to combat drug abuse have been created in high 
        schools across the nation to honor his memory;
Whereas Enrique Camarena is honored each year during National Red Ribbon Week; 
        and
Whereas the 20th Anniversary of Enrique Camarena's death will be specially 
        honored on March 9, 2005, at the Drug Enforcement Administration 
        headquarters: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) mourns the loss of Enrique Camarena;
            (2) recognizes the contributions of Enrique Camarena to our 
        country's efforts to combat drug abuse;
            (3) admires the courage and dedication of Enrique Camarena 
        in his work as a Special Agent of the Drug Enforcement 
        Administration;
            (4) expresses gratitude for the legacy Enrique Camarena 
        left; and
            (5) directs the Clerk of the House of Representatives to 
        transmit an enrolled copy of this resolution to the family of 
        Enrique Camarena.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1040.89-4 Compliance reviews. ( a ) DOE may conduct preaward and postaward compliance reviews of recipients as prescribed in this part or use other similar procedures that will permit it to investigate and correct violations of the Act and these regulations. DOE may conduct these reviews even in the absence of a complaint against a recipient. The review may be as comprehensive as necessary to determine whether a violation of these regulations has occurred.
( b ) If a compliance review indicates a violation of the Act or these regulations, DOE will attempt to achieve voluntary compliance with the Act. If voluntary compliance cannot be achieved, DOE will arrange for enforcement as described in § 1040.89-10.
Order filed May 31 , 2012.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 12

- 00 489

- CV

____________ IN THE INTEREST OF A.A. , a Child

On Appeal from the 315th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011

- 04041J



### ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal from a judgment in a suit in which the termination of the parent

- child relationship is at issue (“parental termination case”). T he notice of appeal was filed May 17 , 2012. Appellant has established indigence or is pres umed to be indigent. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(a). The reporter’s record was due within 10 days after the notice of appeal was filed

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1(b); 28.4(a)(1). The record
has not been filed. Appeals in parental termination cases and child protection cases are to be brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. See Tex. R.Jud. Admin. 6.2(a) (effective May 1, 2012). The trial and appellate courts are jointly

responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). The trial court must direct the court reporter to immediately commence the preparation of the reporter’s record and must arrange for a substitute rep orter, if

necessary. See Tex. R. App. P. 28.4(b)(1). Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely in this accelerated appeal, we issue the following order:

We order Cara Skinner , the substitute court reporter, to file the record in this

appea l on or before June 11, 2012. If Cara Skinner does not timely file the record as ordered, the court will issue an order requiring her to appear at a hearing to show cause why the record has not been timely filed and why she should not be held in contem pt of court for failing to file the record as ordered. Contempt of court is punishable by a fine and/or confinement in jail.

PER CURIAM
H. Res. 119

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

March 9, 2005.

Whereas 2005 marks the 60th anniversary of the Battle of

Iwo Jima, in which the United States Marine Corps and

other units of the United States Armed Forces assaulted

and captured the island of Iwo Jima during World War

II;

Whereas the United States success in capturing Iwo Jima

was a crucial victory that provided a location for necessary airbases to eventually win World War II in the

Pacific theatre;

Whereas, in recognition of the particularly hazardous battlefield conditions experienced by the Marines and other

members of the United States Armed Forces on Iwo

Jima, Commander in Chief of the Pacific Fleet, Fleet

Admiral Chester W. Nimitz stated that ‘‘Among the men

who fought on Iwo Jima, uncommon valor was a common

virtue.’’; and

Whereas more than 70,000 Marines participated in the Battle of Iwo Jima, of whom 17,372 Marines were wounded

and 5,931 Marines made the ultimate sacrifice, giving

their lives to secure the cause of freedom and the United

States victory in the battle: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—
2

•HRES 119 EH

(1) recognizes the 60th anniversary of the Battle of

Iwo Jima; and

(2) recognizes and commends the members of the

United States Marine Corps and all other members of

the United States Armed Forces who participated in the

Battle of Iwo Jima for their sacrifice and contribution,

with particular honor given to those members of the

Armed Forces who gave their lives in defense of freedom

during the Battle of Iwo Jima.

Attest:

Clerk.
Missouri Court of Appeals

Southern District 

NOVEMBER 18, 2014 

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b). 

1. Case No. SD33084 

 Re: MICHAEL EUGENE MCNEAR, 

 Movant-Appellant, 

 vs. 

 STATE OF MISSOURI, 

 Respondent-Respondent.
Note Regarding this
Exhibit:  This document provides a written description of an oral
contract entered into between OneUp Innovations, Inc. and
Don Cohen on July 25, 2008.

    


    Parties:

    


    Don Cohen
(“Lender”)

    Director

    OneUp
Innovations, Inc.

    2745
Bankers Industrial Drive

    Atlanta,
GA 30360

    


    OneUp
Innovations, Inc. (the “Company”)

    2745
Bankers Industrial Drive

    Atlanta,
GA 30360

    


    Date:

    


    July 25,
2008

    


    Material
Terms:

    


    This oral
contract was for a subordinated note payable.  The Lender agreed to
provide the Company with loans from time to time to supplement the working
capital of the Company. These loans are unsecured and are subordinated to any
and all other loans that the Company may have.

    


    Interest
on any loans accrues at the Prime Lending rate. The loans have no specific
maturity and are payable upon demand, if the Company has the ability (and the
right) to repay them.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1045

#### Editorial Notes:Nomenclature changes to part 1045 appear at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023, and 88 FR 82238, Nov. 24, 2023.

§ 1045.25 What actions can be taken against a person who violates the requirements in this part?

Editorial Notes:

Nomenclature changes to part 1045 appear at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023, and 88 FR 82238, Nov. 24, 2023.

Any knowing, willful, or negligent action contrary to the requirements of this part that results in the misclassification of information is subject to appropriate sanctions. Such sanctions may range from administrative sanctions (*e.g.,* reprimand, suspension, termination) to civil or criminal penalties, depending on the nature and severity of the action as determined by the appropriate authority in accordance with applicable laws. Other violations of the policies and procedures in this part may be grounds for administrative sanctions as determined by an appropriate authority.
# SUBCHAPTER E—GENERAL CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS   

- PART 3029—TAXES [RESERVED] 
- PART 3030—COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ADMINISTRATION 
- PART 3031—CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES 
- PART 3032—CONTRACT FINANCING 
- PART 3033—PROTESTS, DISPUTES, AND APPEALS 
- PART 3034—MAJOR SYSTEM ACQUISITION 

- PART 3029—TAXES [RESERVED]   
- PART 3030—COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ADMINISTRATION    - Subpart 3030.2—CAS Program Requirements     - 3030.201   Contract requirements.
    - 3030.201-5   Waiver.
- PART 3031—CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES    - Subpart 3031.2—Contracts with Commercial Organizations     - 3031.205   Selected costs.
    - 3031.205-32   Precontract costs.
- PART 3032—CONTRACT FINANCING    - Subpart 3032.000—Scope of Part     - 3032.003   Simplified acquisition procedures financing.
    - 3032.006   Reduction or suspension of contract payments upon finding of fraud.
    - 3032.006-2   Definition.
    - 3032.006-3   Responsibilities.
  - Subpart 3032.11—Electronic Funds Transfer     - 3032.1110   Solicitation provision and contract clauses.
- PART 3033—PROTESTS, DISPUTES, AND APPEALS    - Subpart 3033.1—Protests     - 3033.102   General.
    - 3033.102-90   Protests on classified solicitations (OSA).
  - Subpart 3033.2—Disputes and Appeals     - 3033.201   Definitions.
    - 3033.211   Contracting officer's decision.
    - 3033.214   Alternative dispute resolution (ADR).
- PART 3034—MAJOR SYSTEM ACQUISITION        - Subpart 3034.0—General     - 3034.0   General
    - 3034.004   Acquisition strategy.
EX-35.2
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Commercial Mortgage Servicing
D1086-120, 12th Floor
550 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement
dated as of December 1, 2012, by and among Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage
Securities, Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as
Master Servicer, Certificate Administrator, Tax Administrator and Custodian,
Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special
Servicer, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Trust Advisor and U.S. Bank National
Association, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates WFRBS 2012-C10 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein
not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive
Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

1. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from December 1,
2012 through December 31, 2012, and of its performance per the Agreement during
such period has been made under my supervision, and

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer, has
fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects
throughout the period December 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the
13th day of March 2013.

/s/Daniel Bober
Daniel Bober
Executive Vice President
Wells Fargo Bank


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

(logo) Together we'll go far
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 20-1530

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Moses Anthon Francisco, also known as Moses Francisco Cruz, also known as Slick

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

 ___________________________

No. 20-1531

___________________________

 United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Moses Anthon Francisco, also known as Moses Francisco Cruz, also known as

Slick, also known as Moses Anthony Francisco

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

 ___________________________

No. 20-1532

___________________________

 United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.

Moses Anthon Francisco

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

 ____________

Appeals from United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Iowa - Western

 ____________

 Submitted: November 23, 2020

Filed: December 7, 2020

[Unpublished]

____________

Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Moses Francisco appeals the above-Guidelines

sentence imposed by the district court1 after he pleaded guilty to immigration and

firearm offenses--instituted by separate indictments--and his supervised release for

a prior offense was revoked. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and has

filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the

sentence is unreasonable.

1The Honorable Leonard T. Strand, Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the Northern District of Iowa.

-2-
Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its

discretion by departing upward from the Guidelines, and did not impose a

substantively unreasonable sentence, as the court properly considered the factors

listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553, and did not err in weighing the relevant factors. See

United States v. Vasquez, 552 F.3d 734, 738 (8th Cir. 2009) (departures from

sentencing Guidelines are reviewed for abuse of discretion; in determining whether

to depart upward, court should consider nature and extent of criminal history); United

States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir. 2009) (sentences are reviewed for

substantive reasonableness under deferential abuse of discretion standard; abuse of

discretion occurs when court fails to consider relevant factor, gives significant weight

to improper or irrelevant factor, or commits clear error of judgment in weighing

appropriate factors; this court must give due deference to district court’s

determination that § 3553(a) factors justify upward variance).

We have also independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488

U.S. 75 (1988), and we find no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we

affirm, and we grant counsel's motions to withdraw.

______________________________

-3-
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

vs. ) CR. NO. 2:06cr205-WHA

COURTNEY D. FLOWERS )

ORDER

Due to a conflict which has arisen in the court’s calendar, the sentencing in this case,

previously set for January 22, 2007, is RESCHEDULED for February 1, 2007, at 10:00 a.m. in

District Courtroom 2-C, Frank M. Johnson, Jr. United States Courthouse Complex, One Church

Street, Montgomery, Alabama.

DONE this 4th day of October, 2006.

/s/ W. Harold Albritton 

W. HAROLD ALBRITTON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00205-WHA-CSC Document 30 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 1 of 1