alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 996.2 Conditional release.

*Conditional release* means release from U.S. Customs Service custody to the importer for purposes of handling and USDA required sampling, inspection and chemical analysis.

[68 FR 1157, Jan. 9, 2003]
Subpart 1451.1 - Contractor Use of

Government Supply Sources

Parent topic: PART 1451 - USES OF GOVERNMENT SOURCES BY CONTRACTORS

1451.102 Authorization to use Government supply sources.

If the CO decides to authorize a contractor to use Government supply sources under the conditions

prescribed in FAR 51.102, a written request for a FEDSTRIP activity address code (See FPMR

101-26.203) shall be made through the acquisition office FEDSTRIP point of contact.
Exhibit 3.1
 BY-LAWS
OF
INTEGRA BANK CORPORATION
  Offices
 Principal Office.
 Other Offices.
  Meetings of Shareholders
 Annual Meeting.
 Special Meetings.
 Place of Meetings.
 Notice of Meetings.




---



##### 



Waiver of Notice.
 Quorum
   Proxies.
  Voting.
  -2-




---



##### 



Business of Shareholder Meetings
  Directors
 Number of Directors; Vote Required; Term of Office.
  -3-




---



##### 



Vacancies.
 Meetings of the Board.
    Quorum.
  -4-




---



##### 



Action Without Meeting.
 Compensation.
 Retirement.
 Nominations.
  -5-




---



##### 



Committees
 Joint Committees
 Nominating and Governance Committee
 ALCO and Finance Committee
 Credit and Risk Management Committee
  -6-




---



##### 



Compensation Committee
 Audit Committee
 Other Committees
          -7-




---



##### 



Committee Vacancies
  Officers
 General Provisions.
 Term of Office.
   Compulsory Retirement of Executive Officers.
  Duties of Officers
 Chairman of the Board.
  -8-




---



##### 



President.
 Executive Vice President.
 Senior Vice President
 Vice President
 Secretary.
 Treasurer.
  -9-




---



##### 



Assistant and Subordinate Officers.
  Duties of Officers may be Delegated.
  Capital Stock
 Certificates for Shares
  -10-




---



##### 



Transfer of Shares
 Addresses of Shareholders
 Lost, Destroyed and Mutilated Certificates
 Regulations
  -11-




---



##### 



Fixing Date for Determination of Shareholders of Record
  Fiscal Year
   Seal
   Amendments
   -12-




---



##### 



Indemnification of Officers, Directors, and Other Eligible Persons
 Mandatory Indemnification
 Definitions
      -13-




---



##### 



Procedure for Claiming Indemnification
  -14-




---



##### 



Alternative Procedures
 Advancement
 Additional Rights
  -15-




---



##### 



Contract Right
 Application
 Enforcement
  Other Provisions
 Control Share Acquisition Provision
 Mandatory Classified Board Structure
  -16-
# SUBCHAPTER H - CLAUSES AND FORMS

- PART 2152 - PRECONTRACT PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES 
- PARTS 2153-2199 [RESERVED] 

- PART 2152 - PRECONTRACT PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES    - 2152.070   Applicable clauses.
  - Subpart 2152.2 - Text of Provisions and Clauses     - 2152.203-70   Misleading, deceptive, or unfair advertising.
    - 2152.204-70   Taxpayer Identification Number.
    - 2152.209-70   Certification regarding debarment, suspension, proposed debarment and other responsibility matters during negotiations.
    - 2152.209-71   Certification regarding debarment, suspension, proposed debarment, and other responsibility matters.
    - 2152.210-70   Investment income.
    - 2152.210-71   Notice of significant events.
    - 2152.215-70   Contractor records retention.
    - 2152.216-70   Fixed price with limited cost redetermination - risk charge.
    - 2152.216-71   Fixed price with limited cost redetermination - service charge.
    - 2152.224-70   Confidentiality of records.
    - 2152.231-70   Accounting and allowable cost.
    - 2152.232-70   Payments.
    - 2152.232-71   Non-commingling of FEGLI Program funds.
    - 2152.232-72   Approval for assignment of claims.
    - 2152.237-70   Continuity of services.
    - 2152.243-70   Changes.
    - 2152.244-70   Subcontracts.
    - 2152.246-70   Quality assurance requirements.
    - 2152.249-70   Renewal and termination.
  - Subpart 2152.3 - Provision and Clause Matrix     - 2152.370   Use of the matrix.
- PARTS 2153-2199 [RESERVED]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk December 26, 2012

s1217 

# Order

December 26, 2012

146039

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146039

COA: 311281

Kent CC: 11

- 010690

- FH;

12

- 001120

- FH

GERMAINE NELSON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 6, 2012

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Editorial Note on Part 982
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 61 FR 17559, Apr. 22, 1996.

§ 982.452 Disposition of restricted hazelnuts. ( a ) *Shelling.* ( 1 ) Any person desiring to shell restricted hazelnuts during a fiscal year may do so upon being designated by the Board as an authorized sheller for such year. Application for such designation shall be made in duplicate on F/H Form B and include, in addition to the conditions specified in § 982.52(a), the following: ( i ) The location of the applicant's shelling operation;
( ii ) the number of years such person has operated a hazelnut shelling plant; and
( iii ) the daily (8-hour) shelling capacity of the plant. Designation of an authorized sheller shall be effected by the board manager signing the application form and returning a signed copy of the form to the applicant. Each such designation shall continue in effect during the particular fiscal year so long as the authorized sheller is in compliance with the requirements and conditions pursuant to § 982.52 applicable to authorized shellers.
( 2 ) When an authorized sheller completes the shelling of a lot of restricted hazelnuts, the sheller shall submit a report thereon to the Board on F/H Form 7 showing: ( i ) The date shelling was completed;
( ii ) The inspection certificate or lot number;
( iii ) The quantity shelled;
( iv ) The weight of the kernels produced; and
( v ) The location where restricted hazelnuts were held immediately prior to shelling.
( b ) *Exports.* Any handler who desires to act as agent of the Board in negotiating export sales of certified merchantable restricted hazelnuts may do so upon the execution of an “Export Agreement”, F/H Form A, wherein the handler agrees, among other things, to negotiate such export sales at not less than such price as the Board may prescribe, and in conformity to and compliance with the other terms and conditions of the Export Agreement including those set forth in § 982.52(b).
( c ) *Other authorized outlets.* Under the direction or supervision of the Board, a handler may dispose of restricted hazelnuts for charitable purposes and for promoting the consumption of hazelnuts on behalf of the hazelnut industry in general. The report required under § 982.67(b) following each such disposition shall be accompanied by a certification by the person receiving such hazelnuts from the handler that they will be used for charitable or promotional purposes, as authorized.
[26 FR 4191, May 16, 1961. Redesignated at 26 FR 12751, Dec. 30, 1960, as amended at 54 FR 46721, Nov. 7, 1989]
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

JAMES KUCZMASKI, etc., )

et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv731-MHT

) 

US FOODSERVICE, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

By oral agreement of the parties, it is ORDERED that

the joint motion for approval of settlement agreement

(Doc. No. 43) is set for hearing on October 11, 2007, at

9:00 a.m. Counsel for defendant is to arrange for the

hearing to be conducted by telephone. Plaintiffs are to

be available by telephone so that they can give

testimony.

DONE, this the 25th day of September, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 44 Filed 09/25/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### Dale *v.*Christian.

November 12, 1913.

Attachment. Before Judge Thomas. Brooks superior court. November 8, 1912.

Christian sued out an attachment against Dale upon the grounds that he was absconding and that he was actually removing without the limits of Brooks county. The defendant traversed the grounds *791of the attachment; and upon the trial of the issue thus made'the jury found for the plaintiff. A motion for a new trial was overruled, and the defendant excepted.

*790Beck, J.

1. The court erred in permitting the plaintiff to testify that he signed a note at the Bank of Quitman for the amount for which the attachment was issued, as security for the defendant; this evidence having been admitted over timely objection upon the ground that the note was the best evidence to show the amount for which it was given, and who signed it. However, if upon the production of the note it does not appear on the face of it whether the plaintiff signed as surety or not, it would be competent to establish that fact by his testimony.

2. The ruling of the court admitting other evidence of the same character as above, over substantially the same objection, is open to the same criticism.

3. The fact that other creditors of the- defendant had sued out attachments against him was irrelevant to the issue in this case, and should have been excluded.

*4.*The affidavit upon which the attachment was issued in this ease and the attachment issued thereon' had no evidentiary value relatively to the issues involved. They would be before the jury as pleadings, but should not have been introduced as evidence.

5. Where an attorney at law had testified in favor of the defendant, it was not irrelevant to show by the same witness that he represented .other creditors of the defendant who would gain an advantage in case the traverse was sustained. Objection to the testimony on the ground that it was incompetent is too general, where it does not state for what reasons it was incompetent.

6. No opinion is expressed as to the sufficiency of the evidence, as the case is remanded for a new trial.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*791*Baum & Johnson,*for plaintiff in error.

*Branch & Snow,*contra.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                          47,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               230,000
<PP&E>                                      10,072,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  47,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,302,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          184,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    12,737,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (8,339,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,302,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               197,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   92,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               164,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             130,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (89,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (89,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (89,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)
        

</TABLE>
Case 2:06-cv-00719-WKW-WC Document 2 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 1 of 1
2936.604 Performance evaluation.       (a) The HCA must establish procedures to evaluate architect-engineer contractor performance as required in FAR 36.604. Normally, the performance report must be prepared by the contracting officer's authorized representative or other official who was responsible for monitoring contract performance and who is qualified to evaluate overall performance. DOL Agency/Office procedures must prescribe instructions for review of the report, before distribution, as prescribed in FAR 36.604(b).          (b) Performance reports must be made using Standard Form 1421, Performance Evaluation (Architect-Engineer) as prescribed in FAR 36.702(c). Details covering unsatisfactory performance, including Government notification to the contractor and written comments by the contractor, must also be attached to the report.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2936.6 - Architect-Engineer Services
REMOTE ONE R1ghr Conrrol IMBAUCAMERA SIGN
#### § 993.37 Research and development.

The committee, with the approval of the Secretary, may establish or provide for the establishment of marketing research and development projects designed to assist, improve, or promote the marketing, distribution, and consumption of prunes. The expense of such projects shall be paid from funds collected pursuant to § 993.81.
# SUBCHAPTER A - GENERAL

- PART 800 [RESERVED] 
- PART 801 - DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS ACQUISITION REGULATION SYSTEM 
- PART 802 - DEFINITIONS OF WORDS AND TERMS 
- PART 803 - IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST 
- PART 804 - ADMINISTRATIVE AND INFORMATION MATTERS 

- PART 800 [RESERVED]   
- PART 801 - DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS ACQUISITION REGULATION SYSTEM       - 801.000   Scope of part.
  - Subpart 801.1 - Purpose, Authority, Issuance     - 801.101   Purpose.
    - 801.103   Authority.
    - 801.104   Applicability.
    - 801.104-70   Exclusions.
    - 801.106   OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act.
  - Subpart 801.3 - Agency Acquisition Regulations     - 801.301   Policy.
    - 801.304   Agency control and compliance procedures.
  - Subpart 801.4 - Deviations From the FAR     - 801.403   Individual deviations.
    - 801.404   Class deviations.
  - Subpart 801.6 - Career Development, Contracting Authority, and Responsibilities     - 801.601   General.
    - 801.602-3   Ratification of unauthorized commitments.
    - 801.604   Contracting Officer`s Representative (COR).
- PART 802 - DEFINITIONS OF WORDS AND TERMS     - Subpart 802.1 - Definitions     - 802.101   Definitions.
- PART 803 - IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST     - Subpart 803.1 [Reserved]
  - Subpart 803.2 - Contractor Gratuities to Government Personnel     - 803.203   Reporting suspected violations of the Gratuities clause.
    - 803.204   Treatment of violations.
  - Subparts 803.3 - 803.4 [Reserved]
  - Subpart 803.5 - Other Improper Business Practices     - 803.570   Commercial advertising.
    - 803.570-1   Policy.
    - 803.570-2   Contract clause.
  - Subparts 803.6 - 803.8 [Reserved]
  - Subpart 803.11 - Preventing Personal Conflicts of Interest for Contractor Employees Performing Acquisition Functions     - 803.1103   Procedures.
  - Subpart 803.70 [Reserved]
- PART 804 - ADMINISTRATIVE AND INFORMATION MATTERS      - Subpart 804.1 [Reserved]
  - Subpart 804.13 - Personal Identity Verification     - 804.1303   Contract clause.
  - Subpart 804.19 - Basic Safeguarding of Covered Contractor Information Systems     - 804.1900-70   Scope of this subpart.
    - 804.1902   Applicability.
    - 804.1970   Information security policy - contractor general responsibilities.
    - 804.1903   Contract clause.
#### § 1040.89-10 Hearings, decisions, post-termination proceedings.

DOE procedural provisions applicable to title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 apply to DOE enforcement of these regulations. They are 10 CFR subpart H §§ 1040.121 through 1040.124.
#### § 1707.204 Service of subpoenas or requests.

Subpoenas or requests for official records or information or testimony must be served on the General Counsel, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, 625 Indiana Avenue, NW., Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004-2901.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-1998
<CASH>                                             300
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,948,769
<ALLOWANCES>                                    68,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,605,832
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,998,446
<PP&E>                                       1,564,560
<DEPRECIATION>                                 717,696
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,802,159
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,559,142
<BONDS>                                        324,003
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,359,201
<OTHER-SE>                                     469,180
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,873,270
<SALES>                                      3,537,314
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,537,314
<CGS>                                        1,992,464
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,436,347
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,024
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,857
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 61,622
<INCOME-TAX>                                    24,650
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             36,972
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    36,972
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
727.409 Solicitation provisions and contract

clauses.

(a) When the contracting officer inserts (48 CFR) FAR 52.227–14, and if the release or publication of

data first produced in the performance of the contract may be sensitive to U.S. Government relations

with the cooperating country, the contracting officer must use the clause at (48 CFR) AIDAR

752.227–14.

(b) through (m) [Reserved]

(n) The prescriptions for provisions and clauses in (48 CFR) FAR 27.409 apply to all USAID contracts

regardless of place of performance.

Parent topic: Subpart 727.4—Rights in Data and Copyrights
# SUBCHAPTERS I-L [RESERVED]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

M IDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABA M A

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

September 18, 2006

NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE

To: ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD

Case Style: D E Enterprises, LLC v. Zurich North America

Case Number: #3:06-cv-00692-VPM

Referenced Pleading: Notice of Filing

Docket Entry Number: #4 and #5

The referenced pleadings were electronically filed on 9/15/2006 in this case and are not in

compliance with the local rules and/or administrative procedures of this court. 

******These pleadings are discovery and are not allowed pursuant to Local Rule 5.1 NONFILING OF CIVIL DISCOVERY.

The pleadings are hereby STRICKEN from the record and the parties are instructed to

disregard the entry of these pleadings on the court’s docket. Parties should be aware that the

striking of these entries does not affect their responsibilities as to the discovery process.

Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 6 Filed 09/18/2006 Page 1 of 1
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 2.1008 [Reserved]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

)

vs. ) CR. NO.: 2:06CR200-WHA

)

ROSA E. RINCON )

)

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Motion to Produce Client for Motion Hearing (doc.

#69) filed by Defendant it is

ORDERED that the motion be and is hereby GRANTED. The United States

Marshal or the person having custody of the defendant shall produce the defendant for the

evidentiary hearing set for November 28, 2006 at 2:00 p..m., in courtroom 4B, United

States Courthouse Complex, One Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama. The Clerk is

DIRECTED to provide an interpreter for the hearing.

Done this 14th day of November, 2006.

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 70 Filed 11/14/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### Mollie McNeil, as Administratrix of the Estate of Willie McNeil, Deceased, Appellant, v. Town of Hempstead et al., Respondents.

Order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered September 17, 1969, affirmed insofar as it applies to defendant the Village of Hempstead, without costs. No opinion. By order of this court, dated January 6, 1970, the appeal as to defendant the Town of Hempstead was deemed withdrawn and discontinued. Munder, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Kleinfeld and Benjamin, JJ., concur. [60 Misc 2d 797.]
#### § 958.89 Counterparts.

This agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts and when one counterpart is signed by the Secretary, all such counterparts shall constitute, when taken together, one and the same instrument as if all signatures were contained in one original.

[41 FR 29135, July 15, 1976]
§ 20.2005 Disposal of specific wastes. ( a ) A licensee may dispose of the following licensed material as if it were not radioactive: ( 1 ) 0.05 microcurie (1.85 kBq), or less, of hydrogen-3 or carbon-14 per gram of medium used for liquid scintillation counting; and
( 2 ) 0.05 microcurie (1.85 kBq), or less, of hydrogen-3 or carbon-14 per gram of animal tissue, averaged over the weight of the entire animal.
( b ) A licensee may not dispose of tissue under paragraph (a)(2) of this section in a manner that would permit its use either as food for humans or as animal feed.
( c ) The licensee shall maintain records in accordance with § 20.2108.
#### § 1022.23 Applicant responsibilities.

DOE may require applicants for any use of real property (*e.g.,* license, easement, lease, transfer, or disposal), permits, certificates, loans, grants, contract awards, allocations, or other forms of assistance or other entitlement related to activities in a floodplain or wetland to provide information necessary for DOE to comply with this part.
To: Department ofTransportation From: Robert Geesey Date: lith November 2013 Re: 

### Comment for Rulemaking FAA-2013-0902 1**'."-:'.~i ~**  C1

. . '**~** I'm am a private citizen who feels that-airline travel already being a cramped andGeesey

hellish experience--matters ought not become worse bypotentially allowing 300 people to crash due to a lack ofAirbus certification simply so manufacturers can expedite novelties. Certification for anyAirbus seems appropriate inregards to a common carrier, but especially so when a model is trying something new and untested while harboring so many souls. Thus I support this rulemaking and hope the agency implements FAA-2013-0902 it in its entirety.