alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 1:06-cr-170-WHA-DRB 

 )

ROY DALE WALLACE )

GOVERNMENT'S MOTION FOR DETENTION HEARING

Comes now the United States of America, by and through Leura G. Canary, United States

Attorney for the Middle District of Alabama, and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3142(e) and (f) moves for

a detention hearing for the above-captioned defendant.

1. Eligibility of Cases

This case is eligible for a detention order because this case involves:

Crime of violence (18 U.S.C. 3156)

 X Maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death

 X 10 + year drug offense

 Felony, with two prior convictions in the above categories

 X Serious risk the defendant will flee

 Serious risk of obstruction of justice

Felony involving a minor victim

Felony involving possession possession or use of a firearm or other destructive

device (as defined by 18 U.S.C. 921) or any other dangerous weapon

Failure to register a sex offender (18 U.S.C 2250)

2. Reason For Detention

The Court should detain defendant because there are no conditions of release which will

reasonably assure:

Case 1:06-cr-00170-WHA-CSC Document 199 Filed 10/10/2006 Page 1 of 2
 X Defendant's appearance as required

 X Safety of any other person and the community

3. Rebuttable Presumption

The United States will invoke the rebuttable presumption against defendant under Section

3142(e). The presumption applies because:

X Probable cause to believe defendant committed 10 + year drug offense or an offense

in which a firearm was used or carried under Section 924(c)

 Previous conviction for "eligible" offense committed while on pretrial bond

 A period of five years has not elapsed from defendant's conviction or release from

imprisonment for the offense described above

4. Time For Detention Hearing

The United States requests the Court conduct the detention hearing:

At the initial appearance

 X After continuance of 3 days

The Government requests leave of Court to file a supplemental motion with additional

grounds or presumption for detention should this be necessary.

Respectfully submitted this the 10th day of August, 2006.

LEURA G. CANARY 

United States Attorney

s/A. Clark Morris

A. CLARK MORRIS

Assistant United States Attorney

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334)223-7280

Fax: (334)223-7135

E-mail: clark. morris@usdoj.gov

ASB-1613-N77A

Case 1:06-cr-00170-WHA-CSC Document 199 Filed 10/10/2006 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit
10.4


 


FIRST
AMENDMENT


TO
PROMISSORY NOTE


 


Reference is made to the
Revolving Promissory Note dated as of August 30, 2006 in the original
principal amount of up to $20,000,000.00 issued by TechTarget, Inc. (the “Borrower”)
to the order of Citizens Bank of Massachusetts (the “Note”).


 


The Borrower and Lender, for
good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, hereby agree to amend the Note as follows:


 


1.                                       All references
in the Note to Lender shall be deemed to mean RBS Citizens, National
Association, as successor by merger to Citizens Bank of Massachusetts, with a
place of business at 28 State Street, Boston, Massachusetts.


 


2.                                       The maximum
principal amount of the Note is hereby limited up to $5,000,000.00 and the
definition of Principal Balance is hereby amended to read as follows:


 


“Principal
Balance:  Up to Five Million Dollars
($5,000,000.00).”


 


(there is no further text on this
page)


 

















 


As amended hereby, the Note
is hereby affirmed and shall continue in full force and effect in accordance
with its terms.


 


Executed this 17th day of
December, 2009


 


	
   

  	
   

  	
  TECHTARGET,
  INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Its:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Accepted as the First Amendment to the foregoing
  Promissory Note:

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  RBS
  CITIZENS, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  successor
  by merger to Citizens Bank of Massachusetts

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  William M. Clossey, Vice President

  	
   

  	
   

  
					



 


2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 234 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 234

 Providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 131) amending 
rule XI of the Rules of the House of Representatives with regard to the 
     procedures of the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2005

Mr. Mollohan submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 131) amending 
rule XI of the Rules of the House of Representatives with regard to the 
     procedures of the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct.

    Resolved, That immediately upon the adoption of this resolution the 
House shall without intervention of any point of order consider in the 
House the resolution (H. Res. 131) amending rule XI of the Rules of the 
House of Representatives with regard to the procedures of the Committee 
on Standards of Official Conduct. The resolution shall be considered as 
read. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
resolution to final adoption without intervening motion except one hour 
of debate on the resolution equally divided and controlled by the 
gentleman from West Virginia, Mr. Mollohan, and an opponent.
                                 <all>
```
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

In the Interest of B.M.W., a Minor Child

No. 06

- 14

- 00028

- CV Appeal from the 6th District Court of Lamar County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 81876 ).

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice

Mosel ey, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice

Carter participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed

. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that the appellant has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal.

Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JULY 24, 2014

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, *

*

*

v. * CASE NO. 2:06MJ75.DRB

*

RONALD MCQUEEN *

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

Comes now the undersigned counsel and enters his appearance in this cause as Counsel for

Ronald McQueen.

Respectfully submitted,

s/Susan G. James

SUSAN G. JAMES

Attorney at Law

600 South McDonough Street

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Phone: (334) 269-3330

Fax: (334) 834-0353

E-mail: sgjamesandassoc@aol.com

Bar No: JAM012

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 3, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk

of Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following: 

United States Attorney

P.O. Box 197

Montgomery, Alabama, 36101

Case 2:06-cr-00198-WKW-CSC Document 10 Filed 08/03/2006 Page 1 of 2
Respectfully submitted,

s/Susan G. James

SUSAN G. JAMES

Attorney at Law

600 South McDonough Street

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Phone: (334) 269-3330

Fax: (334) 834-0353

E-mail: sgjamesandassoc@aol.com

Bar No: JAM012

Case 2:06-cr-00198-WKW-CSC Document 10 Filed 08/03/2006 Page 2 of 2
Subpart 3047.3—Transportation in Supply Contracts    **Parent topic:** PART 3047—TRANSPORTATION3047.305 Solicitation provisions, contract clauses, and transportation factors.3047.305-70 Solicitation provisions.       The contracting officer shall insert the following provisions in solicitations, as applicable:          (a) (HSAR) 48 CFR 3052.247–70, F.o.b. Origin Information, with Alternates I or II, as applicable, shall be inserted in accordance with (FAR) 48 CFR 47.305–3(b);          (b) (HSAR) 48 CFR 3052.247–71, F.o.b. Origin Only, shall be inserted in accordance with (FAR) 48 CFR 47.305–3(e); and          (c) (HSAR) 48 CFR 3052.247–72, F.o.b. Destination Only, shall be inserted in accordance with (FAR) 48 CFR 47.305–4(b).
#### § 948.6 Seed potatoes.

*Seed potatoes* or *seed* means any potatoes which have been certified by the official seed certification agency of the State of Colorado and bear the official tags, seals, or other appropriate identification indicating such certification.
IV 

House Calendar No. 247 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1096 

[Report No. 109–720] 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules and 

providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 6, 2006 

Mrs. CAPITO, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with 

respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported 

from the Committee on Rules and providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule 

2 XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the 

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to 

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported on the legislative day of December 7, 2006. 

2 

HRES 1096 RH 

1 SEC. 2. It shall be in order at any time on the legisla2 tive day of December 7, 2006, for the Speaker to entertain 

3 motions that the House suspend the rules. The Speaker 

4 or his designee shall consult with the Minority Leader or 

5 her designee on the designation of any matter for consid6 eration pursuant to this resolution. 

7 SEC. 3. House Resolutions 810, 939, 951, and 1047 

8 are laid upon the table. 

House Calendar No. 247 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1096 

[Report No. 109–720] 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII 

the rules, and for other purposes. providing for consideration of motions to suspend tions reported from the Committee on Rules and with respect to consideration of certain resoluDECEMBER 6, 2006 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
PART 18 – EMERGENCY ACQUISITIONS
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 2:06-cr-206-MHT 

 ) 

ALETHIA ADRIANNE SCOTT )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the Motion for Leave to Dismiss the Indictment (doc. no. 19)

as to Alethia Adrianne Scott, heretofore filed in the above styled cause, and for good cause

shown, the Court is of the opinion that the motion should be and the same hereby is granted.

It is, therefore, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED by the Court

that said motion be and the same is hereby granted.

DONE, this the 12th day of September, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

DISMISSAL OF INDICTMENT

Comes now the United States of America with leave of the Court first had and

obtained and dismisses the Indictment heretofore filed in the above styled cause as to

Alethia Adrianne Scott.

Respectfully submitted,

LEURA GARRETT CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/ Christopher A. Snyder

CHRISTOPHER A. SNYDER

One Court Street

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Phone: (334) 223-7280

FAX: (334) 223-7135

christopher.a.snyder@usdoj.gov

Case 2:06-cr-00206-MHT-CSC Document 20 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 1 of 1
NOTICE OF CORRECTION

From: Clerk’s Office

Case Style: McNair v. Allen et al 

Case Number: 2:06-cv-00695-WKW 

Referenced Pleading: Notice of Appearance - Mcdevitt - Doc. 137

This Notice of Correction was filed in the referenced case this date to correct the PDF

documents attached to this notice. Please see the correct PDF documents to this notice.

Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 141 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 1 of 1
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

WILLIE MCNAIR, ) 

 ) 

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, ) 

) 

v. ) Case No. 2:06-cv-695-WKW 

 ) 

RICHARD ALLEN, et al., ) 

) 

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. ) 

___________________________________ 

 ) 

JAMES CALLAHAN, ) 

 ) 

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Case No. 2:06-cv-919-WKW 

 ) 

RICHARD ALLEN, et al., ) 

) 

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. ) 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of this court and all parties of record: 

 Enter the undersigned’s appearance as counsel in this case for Plaintiff James Callahan. 

The undersigned is admitted pro hac vice in this action, previously representing only Plaintiff 

McNair. 

Date: November 8, 2007 /s/ Heather K. McDevitt 

HEATHER K. MCDEVITT 

Bar Number (SDNY): HM9973 

Counsel for Plaintiffs 

White & Case LLP 

1155 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, NY 10036 

Telephone: (212) 819-8200 

Facsimile: (212) 354-8113 

hmcdevitt@whitecase.com

Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 141-2 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on November 8, 2007, a copy of the foregoing was filed electronically with 

the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to 

the following: J. Clayton Crenshaw, James W. Davis, Corey Maze and Jasper Roberts. 

/s/ Peter B. Patterson, Jr. 

Peter B. Patterson, Jr. 

White & Case LLP 

1155 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, NY 10036 

Telephone: (212) 819-8200 

Facsimile: (212) 354-8113 

 ppatterson@whitecase.com

Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 141-2 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 2 of 2
Subpart 2911.1 - Selecting And Developing

Requirements Documents

Parent topic: PART 2911 - DESCRIBING AGENCY NEEDS

2911.103 Market acceptance.

The authority of the Head of an Agency under FAR 11.103(a), to require offerors to demonstrate that

the items offered have either achieved commercial market acceptance or been satisfactorily supplied

to an agency under current or recent contracts for the same or similar requirements, and otherwise

meet the item description, specifications, or other criteria prescribed in the public notice and

solicitation, is delegated to the HCA.
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 14 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 14 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 14 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 14 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 14 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 14 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 6 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 14-2 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 1 of 1
Subpart 306.2 - Full and Open Competition

After Exclusion of Sources

Parent topic: PART 306 - COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS

306.202 Establishing or maintaining alternative sources.

(a) The Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) shall make the determination required in Federal

Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 6.202(a).

(b)

(1) The contracting officer shall prepare the required determination and findings (D&F), see FAR

6.202(b)(1), based on the data provided by program personnel. The appropriate Competition

Advocate (CA) (non-delegable) shall sign the D&F, indicating concurrence. The final determination

will be made by the SPE.
SUBCHAPTER E - GENERAL CONTRACTING

REQUIREMENTS

PART 2428 - BONDS AND INSURANCE

PART 2429 - TAXES

PART 2432 - CONTRACT FINANCING

PART 2433 - PROTESTS, DISPUTES, AND APPEALS

PART 2434 - MAJOR SYSTEM ACQUISITIONS

PART 2428 - BONDS AND INSURANCE

Subpart 2428.1 - Bonds

2428.106 Administration.

2428.106-6 Furnishing information.

PART 2429 - TAXES

Subpart 2429.1 - General

2429.101 Resolving tax problems.

PART 2432 - CONTRACT FINANCING

2432.006 Reduction or suspension of contract payments upon finding of fraud.

2432.006-1 General.

2432.006-2 Definitions.

2432.006-3 Responsibilities.

2432.006-4 Procedures.

2432.007 Contract financing payments.

Subpart 2432.1 - Non-Commercial Item Purchase Financing

2432.114 Unusual contract financing.

Subpart 2432.2 - Commercial Item Purchase Financing

2432.201 Statutory authority.

Subpart 2432.4 - Advance Payments for Non-Commercial Items

2432.402 General.

2432.407 Interest.

Subpart 2432.7 - Contract Funding

2432.703-1 General.

2432.703-3 Contracts crossing fiscal years.

2432.704 Limitation of cost or funds.

2432.704-70 Incrementally funded fixed-price contracts.

2432.705 Contract clauses.

Subpart 2432.9 - Prompt Payment

2432.903 Policy.

2432.906 Making payments.

2432.908 Contract clauses.

PART 2433 - PROTESTS, DISPUTES, AND APPEALS

2433.000 Scope of part.

Subpart 2433.1 - Protests

2433.102 General.

2433.102-70 Responsibility.

2433.103 Protests to the agency.

2433.104 Protests to GAO.

2433.106 Solicitation provision.
PART 2434 - MAJOR SYSTEM ACQUISITIONS

2434.003 Responsibilities.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-736-WKW

)

SEVENTY FOUR THOUSAND SEVEN )

HUNDRED ($74,700) DOLLARS IN )

UNITED STATES CURRENCY, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

In consideration of the defendant’s Motion to Suppress (Doc. #15) filed on February 26,

2007, it is ORDERED that the plaintiff shall file a RESPONSE on or before May 21, 2007.

DONE this 27th day of April, 2007.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00736-WKW-SRW Document 17 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC 27711 

APR 8 2 201 

OFFICE OF 

AIR QUALITY PLANNING 

AND STANDARDS 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: 

FROM: 

TO: 

Extension of Comment Period for I Oth Conference on Air Quality Modeling 

George 

Air Quality 

M Bridgers, 

Modeling 

Model 

Group

Clearinghouse 

, C439-01 

Director d}~~ ~ 

Docket#: EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0056 

In the January 31,2012 Federal Notice publication regarding the l Oth Conference on Air 

Quality Modeling (Modeling Conference), it was announced that the public comment period on 

how the Agency determines and applies air quality models and on material presented at the 

Modeling Conference would remain open through April 16, 2012. In consideration of the 

extensive amount of material provided for review just ahead of and presented at the Modeling 

Conference, we are extending the comment period by two weeks to allow more time for 

commenters to assemble and provide their constructive comments, recommendations, and 

feedback. 

With the submission ofthis memorandum to the Docket (EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0056), the 

comment period for the 1Oth Conference on Air Quality Modeling is herby extended to April 30, 

2012. All comments should be submitted to the Docket by the close of business on April30 and 

per the instructions that were provided in the Federal Register publication. 

If there are any questions regarding this comment period extension, please contact 

George Bridgers ofEPA's Air Quality Modeling Group at (919) 541-5563 or 

bridgers. george@epa. gov. 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed wfth Vegetable 0 11 Based Inks on 100% Recycled Paper (40% Post consumer)
#### § 1044.05 What is the effect of a disclosure qualifying as a “protected disclosure”?

If a DOE or DOE contractor employee follows the procedures of this part when making a disclosure of classified or unclassified controlled nuclear information, then the employer (DOE or DOE contractor as applicable) may not discharge, demote, or otherwise discriminate against the employee as a reprisal for making the disclosure.
#### In the Matter of John Schmitt, Petitioner, v John Dillon, as County Judge, et al., Respondents.

Application unanimously denied and petition dismissed, without costs. (Art 78.) Present — Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Schnepp, Doerr and Witmer, JJ.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intervoice, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Craig
E. Holmes, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. Date: July 1, 2004/s/ Craig E. HolmesCraig E. HolmesExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
2845.105-70 Contractor reporting of Government-furnished property.       (a) In compliance with FAR 45.105, by January 31 of each year, DOJ contractors shall furnish the cognizant contracting officer an annual report of the DOJ property for which they are accountable as of the end of the calendar year.          (b) By March 1 of each year, bureaus shall submit to the FASS, JMD, a summary report of agency property furnished under each contract as of the end of the calendar year. The report shall include a listing of Government-furnished property for all contracts for which the bureau maintains the official Government records.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2845.1 - General
1952.000 Scope of part.

This part implements and supplements FAR part 52 which sets forth solicitation provisions and

contract clauses for use in the acquisition of personal property and nonpersonal services (including

construction).

Parent topic: PART 1952 - SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JUAN JR. CRISTO

- MUNOZ,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 73 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 21st day of June, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.