alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

ANGELA PRICE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 3:06-cv-742-MEF

)

ROANOKE CITY BOARD OF )

EDUCATION, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

This cause is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Continue Pre-Trial Conference

(Doc. # 33). Based on the representations made by counsel for the Plaintiff, it is hereby

ORDERED that:

(1) Plaintiff’s Motion to Continue (Doc. # 33) is GRANTED IN PART AND

DENIED IN PART. Specifically, it is the order of this Court that:

(a) Plaintiff is relieved of the obligation to file the proposed Pretrial Order.

Instead, the Defendant is ORDERED to file a proposed Pretrial Order by October 31,

2007. The parties will be able to discuss any concerns with the proposed Pretrial

Order at the Pretrial Conference on November 2, 2007.

(b) The request to continue the Pretrial Conference is DENIED with leave to

refile. The Pretrial Conference will still be scheduled for November 2, 2007. If any

further complications arise for Plaintiff’s counsel, he may file a Renewed Motion to

Continue, which this Court will consider.

Case 3:06-cv-00742-MEF-WC Document 35 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

DONE this 31st day of October, 2007.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00742-MEF-WC Document 35 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 2 of 2
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

JAMES KUCZMASKI, etc., )

et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv731-MHT

) 

US FOODSERVICE, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion to extend deadlines

(doc. no. 36) is denied.

DONE, this the 15th day of June, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 37 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Newnon A. Flax, Appellant, v John J. Donelli, as Superintendent of Bare Hill Correctional Facility, Respondent.

Submitted December 31, 2007;

decided January 15, 2008

Reported below, 43 AD3d 1259.

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.
#### § 932.33 Vacancies.

To fill any vacancy occasioned by the failure of any person selected as a member, or as an alternate member of the committee to qualify, or in the event of the removal, resignation, disqualification, or death of any member or alternate member, a successor for such person's unexpired term shall be nominated and selected in the manner set forth in § 932.29 insofar as such provisions are applicable. If nomination to fill any such vacancy is not made within 60 calendar days after such vacancy occurs, the Secretary may fill such vacancy without regard to nominations, but on the basis of the applicable representations and qualifications set forth in §§ 932.25, 932.27, and 932.28.
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Integra Bank Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the
undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)    The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Michael J. AlleyMichael
      J. AlleyChairman
      of the Board andChief
      Executive OfficerJuly
      29, 2010/s/ Michael B. CarrollMichael
      B. CarrollChief
      Financial OfficerJuly
      29, 2010
Case 2:06-cv-00739-LES-CSC Document 3 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 1 of 5Case 2:06-cv-00739-LES-CSC Document 3 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 2 of 5Case 2:06-cv-00739-LES-CSC Document 3 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 3 of 5Case 2:06-cv-00739-LES-CSC Document 3 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 4 of 5Case 2:06-cv-00739-LES-CSC Document 3 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 5 of 5
49–008 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 109–671 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 4830, BORDER TUNNEL PREVENTION ACT OF 2006; FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 6094, COMMUNITY PROTECTION ACT OF 2006; AND FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 6095, IMMIGRATION LAW ENFORCEMENT ACT OF 2006 

SEPTEMBER 20, 2006.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. GINGREY, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 1018] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 1018, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 4830, the 

Border Tunnel Prevention Act of 2006, under a closed rule. The 

rule provides one hour of debate in the House equally divided and 

controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 

Committee on the Judiciary. The rule waives all points of order 

against consideration of the bill. The rule provides one motion to 

recommit H.R. 4830. 

The resolution further provides for the consideration of H.R. 

6094, the Community Protection Act of 2006, under a closed rule. 

The rule provides one hour of debate in the House equally divided 

and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 

the Committee on the Judiciary. The rule waives all points of order 

against consideration of the bill. The rule provides one motion to 

recommit H.R. 6094. 

Finally, the resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 

6095, the Immigration Law Enforcement Act of 2006, under a 

closed rule. The rule provides one hour of debate in the House 

equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary. The rule waives all 

points of order against consideration of the bill. The rule provides 

one motion to recommit H.R. 6095. 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with REPORTS
2 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The Committee on Rules is not aware of any points of order 

against consideration of any of the bills. The waivers of all points 

of order against consideration of the bills are prophylactic in nature. 

COMMITTEE VOTES

Pursuant to clause 3(b) of House rule XIII the results of each 

record vote on an amendment or motion to report, together with 

the names of those voting for and against, are printed below: 

Rules Committee record vote No. 242 

Date: September 20, 2006. 

Measure: H.R. 4830, the Border Tunnel Prevention Act of 2006; 

H.R. 6094, the Community Protection Act of 2006; and H.R. 6095, 

the Immigration Law Enforcement Act of 2006. 

Motion by: Mrs. Slaughter. 

Summary of motion: To allow the consideration of each of the 

bills under an open amendment process. 

Results: Defeated 4 to 8. 

Vote by Members: Diaz-Balart—Nay; Sessions—Nay; Putnam—

Nay; Capito—Nay; Cole—Nay; Bishop—Nay; Gingrey—Nay; 

Slaughter—Yea; McGovern—Yea; Hastings (FL)—Yea; Matsui—

Yea; Dreier—Nay. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with REPORTS
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in theevent that publications are no longer available from the original publishingagency site. (Historical purposes)
| **Title:
STATEMENT OF    DISBURSEMENTS OF THE U.S. CAPITOL POLICE FOR THE PERIOD
 
STATEMENTOF DISBURSEMENTS OF THE U.S. CAPITOL POLICE FOR THE PERIOD OCTOBER 1, 2017THROUGH MARCH 31, 2018 (115-126) 

 
STATEMENTOF DISBURSEMENTS OF THE U.S. CAPITOL POLICE FOR THE PERIOD APRIL 1, 2007THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2007 (110-73)

 
SuDoc Number: Y 1.1/7:

Item Number: 0624-H (online)

CGP System Number: 00626886

11/5/2022

 
Issues are no longer available from GOVINFO as of November4, 2022. Incomplete set of archival issues available here.

 ** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### Sandy Cross Gin Company *v.*Dove.

May 15, 1913.

Action for damages. Before Judge Meadow. Franklin superior court. January 24, 19T2.-

Fish, C. J.

No complaint was made that any error of law was committed upon the trial. There was evidence to authorize the verdict; and the court did not err in refusing a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*66
      *George L. Goode,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. 0. Little*and *W. B. Little,*contra.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Francisco Rodriguez Romero, Appellant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered March 16, 1967, convicting defendant of assault in the second degree (two counts) and felonious possession of dangerous weapons (indictment No. 893/1966), upon a jury verdict, affirmed. No opinion. Judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered March 16, 1967, convicting *972defendant of assault in the second degree (indictment No. 884/1966), upon a jury verdict, reversed, on the law and the facts, and new trial ordered in the interests of justice. It was error to exclude proof that one Cuevas was in a State hospital at the time he was alleged to have been at the scene of the crime. It appears from the record that this evidence would affect the credibility of the only witness to identify defendant as the perpetrator of the crime of which he was convicted. A new trial should be ordered, in the interests of justice, to afford defendant an opportunity to adduce such evidence (cf. *People*v. *Kelly,*12 N Y 2d 248). Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Munder, JJ., concur.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 13, 2023

NO. 03-22-00785-CV

Texas Tech University System, Appellant

v.

Dolcefino Communications, LLC d/b/a Dolcefino Consulting and San Angelo 

Standard-Times, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 201ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND THEOFANIS

DISMISSED AS MOOT-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the order entered by the trial court. Having reviewed the record, the Court 

agrees that the appeal should be dismissed. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal as moot.

The parties shall bear costs relating to this appeal consistent with their agreement. If the parties 

did not reach an agreement regarding costs, the parties shall bear the costs of appeal that 

they incurred.
Exhibit 32.2



Citizens Financial Corp.



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley

Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



I,
Thomas K. Derbyshire, Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of Citizens Financial Corp. (the company) certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



|1. | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the company for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                            
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date: August 10, 2005 |  | /s/ Thomas K. Derbyshire   
|                      |  | Thomas K. Derbyshire       
|                      |  | Vice President, Treasurer  
|                      |  | Principal Financial Officer
439.101 Policy.

(a) In addition to policy and regulatory guidance contained in the FAR and AGAR:

(1) The USDA Information Technology Capital Planning and Investment Control Guide (CPIC)

establishes requirements for the acquisition of information technology.

(2) Specific thresholds at which USDA Office of the Chief Information Officer Information

Technology Acquisition Approval is required have been established.

(3) The procurement authority delegated to USDA Agencies is established in Departmental

Regulations 5000 series.

(4) The CPIC Guide and USDA CIO policy and procedural guidance are available on the USDA OCIO

Web site at http://www.ocio.usda.gov. Notices of changes in the Information Technology Acquisition

Approval Thresholds are also promulgated by AGAR Advisory.

(b) Acquisition of on-line courseware libraries and learning management system services requires

specific approval of the ASA and CIO. Information regarding the specific approval requirements and

processes is promulgated by AGAR Advisory.

Parent topic: Subpart 439.1 - General
2425.402 Policy.       (a)          (1)  			It is the Department's policy to determine whether the Trade Agreements Act applies based on the total estimated dollar value of the proposed acquisition before the solicitation is issued, including all line items and options.    **Parent topic:** PART 2425 - TRADE AGREEMENTS ACT
1910.004-70 Brand name products or equal.

(a) General. Consistent with the policy stated in FAR 10.004(a)(2), the Broadcasting Board of

Governors acquisitions will generally not be based on a specifically identified product or feature(s)

thereof. However, under unusual circumstances such an approach may be used as described below.

(b) Citing brand name products. Brand name or equal purchase descriptions shall cite all brand

name products known to be acceptable and of current manufacture. If the use of a brand name or

equal purchase description results in the purchase of an acceptable brand name product which was

not listed as an “equal” product, a reference to that brand name product should be included in the

purchase description for later acquisitions. If a brand name product is no longer applicable, the

reference thereto shall be deleted from subsequent purchase description.

(c) Specifying essential characteristics.

(1) It is imperative that brand name or equal purchase descriptions specify each physical or

functional characteristic of the product that is essential to the intended use. Failure to do so may

result in a defective solicitation and the necessity to resolicit the requirements. (See 1910.004-73.)

Care must be taken to avoid specifying characteristics that cannot be shown to materially affect the

intended end use and which unnecessarily restrict competition.

(2) When describing essential characteristics, permissible tolerances should be indicated. Avoid

specifying a characteristic (e.g., a specific dimension) of a brand name product unless it is essential

to the Government's need. The contracting officer must be able to justify the requirement.

Parent topic: PART 1910 - SPECIFICATIONS, STANDARDS, AND OTHER PURCHASE

DESCRIPTIONS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6823

JACK MCRAE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PAROLE BOARD; DISTRICT OF

COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; UNITED

STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS; UNITED STATES PAROLE

COMMISSION,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.

(CA-01-283-3)

Submitted: August 29, 2002 Decided: September 23, 2002

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jack McRae, Appellant Pro Se. Joan Elizabeth Evans, Assistant

United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia; Carol Paskin Epstein,

Michael Alan Stern, ASSISTANT CORPORATION COUNSEL, D.C.,

Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Jack McRae seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and conclude on the

reasoning of the district court that McRae has not made a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See

McRae v. D.C. Parole Bd., No. CA-01-283-3 (E.D. Va. May 13, 2002).

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 110.71 Notice of withdrawal of an application.

The Commission will notice the withdrawal of an application by making a copy available at the NRC Web site, *http://www.nrc.gov.*

[64 FR 48955, Sept. 9, 1999]
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

38 39 40 41



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 08/22 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 22 Aug 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.92 N 77.01 WMeters AGL
#### § 110.110 Default.

When a participant fails to act within a specified time, the presiding officer may consider him in default, issue an appropriate ruling and proceed without further notice to the defaulting participant.
§ 110.54 Reporting requirements. ( a ) ( 1 ) Reports of exports of nuclear facilities and equipment, nuclear grade graphite for nuclear end use, and deuterium for nuclear end use shipped during the previous quarter must be submitted by licensees making exports under the general license or specific license of this part by January 15, April 15, July 15, and October 15 of each year on DOC/NRC Forms AP-M or AP-13, and associated forms. The reports must contain information on all nuclear facilities, equipment, and non-nuclear materials (nuclear grade graphite for nuclear end use and deuterium for nuclear end use) listed in Annex II of the Additional Protocol.
( 2 ) These required reports must be sent via facsimile to (202) 482-1731, emailed to *aprp@bis.doc.gov ,* or hand-delivered or submitted by courier to the Bureau of Industry and Security, in hard copy, to the following address: Treaty Compliance Division, Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce, Attn: AP Reports, 14th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Room 4515, Washington, DC 20230. Telephone: (202) 482-1001.
( b ) Persons making exports under the general license established by § 110.23(a) or under a specific license shall submit by February 1 of each year one copy of a report of all americium and neptunium shipments during the previous calendar year. This report shall be submitted to the Deputy Director, Office of International Programs at the address provided in § 110.4 or by electronic submission at *110.23reports@nrc.gov*. The report must include: ( 1 ) A description of the material, including quantity in TBq and gram;
( 2 ) Approximate shipment dates; and
( 3 ) A list of recipient countries, end users, and intended use keyed to the items shipped.
( c ) Persons making exports under the general license established by § 110.26(a) shall submit by February 1 of each year one copy of a report of all components shipped during the previous calendar year. This report shall be submitted to the Deputy Director, Office of International Programs at the address provided in § 110.4 or by electronic submission at *110.26reports@nrc.gov*. This report must include: ( 1 ) A description of the components keyed to the categories listed in appendix A to this part.
( 2 ) Approximate shipment dates.
( 3 ) A list of recipient countries and end users keyed to the items shipped.
[75 FR 44092, July 28, 2010, as amended at 77 FR 27114, May 9, 2012; 86 FR 55479, Oct. 6, 2021; 88 FR 80950, Nov. 21, 2023]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>

This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from NATIONAL
HOUSING  PARTNERSHIP REALTY FUND TWO 2000 Second Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.

</LEGEND>

<CIK>                               0000762859
<NAME>                              NATIONAL HOUSING PARTNERSHIP REALTY FUND TWO
<MULTIPLIER>                                           1,000


<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                      APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                     0
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              0
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           0 <F1>
<PP&E>                                                     0
<DEPRECIATION>                                             0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         4,563
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      0 <F1>
<BONDS>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                           (2,801)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           4,563
<SALES>                                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          63
<CGS>                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            194
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            0
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    (131)
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (131)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (7.00) <F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0
<FN>

<F1> Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet. <F2> Multiplier is 1.

</FN>


</TABLE>
Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 3 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 3 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 2 of 2