alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### SHONTS, Respondent, v. THOMAS et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 8, 1906.)

Action by Theodore P. Shonts against Edward R. Thomas and others.

No opinion. Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs, with leave to defendants to answer within 20 days from the entry of the order herein, upon payment of costs of action to date.
#### Henry *v.*Roberts.

August 12, 1913.

Complaint for land. Before Judge Jones. Habersham superior court. March 8, 1912.

I. *H. Sutton,*for plaintiff. *J. G. Edwards,*for defendant.

Fish, C. J.

1. While the plaintiff in an action for land must recover on the strength of his own title, yet, in passing on a motion, for nonsuit upon the conclusion of the evidence submitted in behalf of the plaintiff, such evidence should be construed most favorably to him, and if, so construed, a prima facie case for the plaintiff is made out, a nonsuit should be refused.

2. Construing the evidence for the plaintiff upon the trial most favorably in his behalf, the jury would have been authorized to find, that he and those under whom he claimed had actual and adverse possession of the land for which the action was brought, for more than twenty years prior to the date when the defendant entered into possession thereof. It follows that the court erred in granting a nonsuit.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Subpart 641.2—Acquiring Utility Services

Parent topic: PART 641—ACQUISITION OF UTILITY SERVICES

641.201 Policy.

(d) The Procurement Executive is the agency head for the purposes of FAR 41.201(d)(2)(i) and FAR

41.201(d)(3).
---

---

Exhibit 13.1

# CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF
TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of RRsat Global
Communications Network Ltd., a company organized under the laws of the State of Israel
(the Company), does hereby certify that, to his knowledge:

| | 1. | the
Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the                Form
20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of                Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | the
information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date: March 23, 2009 |  | By: /s/ David Rivel
David Rivel Chief Executive Officer
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
§ 15.1 Application. ( a ) This part applies to claims for the payment of debts owed to the United States Government in the form of money or property and; unless a different procedure is specified in a statute, regulation, or contract; prescribes procedures by which the NRC— ( 1 ) Collects, compromises, suspends, offsets, and terminates collection action for claims;
( 2 ) Determines and collects interest and other charges on these claims; and
( 3 ) Refers unpaid claims over 180 days delinquent to Treasury for offset and collection and to the DOJ for litigation.
( b ) The following are examples of kinds of debts to which special statutory and administrative procedures apply: ( 1 ) A claim against an employee for erroneous payment of pay and allowances subject to waiver under 5 U.S.C. 5584 are covered by the provisions of 10 CFR part 16.
( 2 ) A claim against an applicant for, or a holder or former holder of, an NRC license involving the payment of civil penalties imposed by the NRC under 10 CFR 2.205.
( 3 ) A claim involved in a case pending before any Federal Contract Appeals Board or Grant Appeals Board. However, nothing in this part prevents negotiation and settlement of a claim pending before a Board.
( c ) The NRC is not limited to collection remedies contained in the revised Federal Claims Collection Standards (FCCS). The FCCS is not intended to impair common law remedies.
[47 FR 7616, Feb. 22, 1982, as amended at 55 FR 32377, Aug. 9, 1990; 56 FR 51830, Oct. 16, 1991; 67 FR 30318, May 6, 2002]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

CINCINNATI INSURANCE )

COMPANY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) 3:06-CV-733-MHT-DRB

)

JOSEPH DONALD PRATHER, )

)

Defendant. )

Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel

Michael L. Jackson of the firm of Wallace, Jordan, Ratliff & Brandt, L.L.C.

hereby withdraws as counsel for Plaintiff, Cincinnati Insurance Company, in the

above-captioned case. Attorney Jennifer T. Dewees will continue to represent

Cincinnati Insurance Company.

Respectfully submitted this the 20th day of November, 2006.

 s/Michael L. Jackson 

Michael L. Jackson 

SJIS No. JAC026

E-mail: mlj@wallacejordan.com

Of Counsel:

Wallace, Jordan, Ratliff & Brandt, L.L.C.

Post Office 530910

Birmingham, AL 35253

Phone: 205-870-0555

Fax: 205-871-7534

Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 18 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

CINCINNATI INSURANCE )

COMPANY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) 3:06-CV-733-MHT-DRB

)

JOSEPH DONALD PRATHER, )

)

Defendant. )

Certificate of Service

I certify that on this 20th day of November, 2006, I electronically filed the

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send

notification of such filing to the following:

Jennifer T. Dewees Jennifer_Dewees@staffdefense.com

Stephen D. Heninger steve@hgdlawfirm.com

Stewart Sealy Wilbanks dillardandassoc@aol.com

Timothy L. Dillard dillardandhorn@aol.com

 s/ Michael L. Jackson 

Michael L. Jackson

Wallace, Jordan, Ratliff & Brandt, L.L.C.

Post Office Box 530910

Birmingham, Alabama 35253

Voice: (205) 870-0555

Fax: (205) 871-7534

E-mail: mlj@wallacejordan.com

SJIS Attorney No. JAC026

Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 18 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|         |                                                                                          |                                        |
|--------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
|    |                                                                                     |                                        |
|         |                                                                                          | /s/              Jack              DeFranco |
|         |                                                                                               |
|         | Jack              DeFranco(Acting Principal Executive Officer)Date: May 19,              2006 |

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

October 15, 2007

NOTICE OF CORRECTION

From: Clerk’s Office

Case Style: United Stats of America vs. Seventy Four Thousand Seven Hundred Dollars

Case Number:2:06cv736-WKW

Notice of Correction is filed this date to correct the following deficient pleading which was

filed on 10/12/07 in accordance with amended Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 5(e).

 Reference is made to document # 35 filed electronically by counsel which did not contain his

electronic signatures. 

The corrected pdf document is attached to this Notice.

Case 2:06-cv-00736-WKW-SRW Document 37 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

PLAINTIFF, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv736-WKW

)

SEVENTY FOUR THOUSAND SEVEN )

HUNDRED ($74,700) DOLLARS IN )

UNITED STATES CURRENCY, )

)

DEFENDANT. )

JOINT MOTION FOR TRIAL UPON SUBMITTED EVIDENCE AND BRIEFS

The United States of America (United States), by and through

Leura G. Canary, United States Attorney for the Middle District of

Alabama, and John T. Harmon, Assistant United States Attorney,

hereby submits the following:

1. A bench trial in this matter is currently set for October

15, 2007. The parties have reached an agreement to, upon Court

approval, submit all issues to the Court to be decided based upon

the transcript of the suppression hearing conducted on September 6,

2007, drug analysis reports on all drugs seized in this case and

briefs. No other evidence will be submitted. Written stipulations

to this effect have been executed and will be submitted to the

Court next week.

2. Accordingly, the parties would jointly move to continue

the October 15, 2007, trial date. The parties would further move

the Court to allow the United States to submit the aforementioned

transcript, the drug analysis reports and a trial brief on October

Case 2:06-cv-00736-WKW-SRW Document 37-2 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 2
29, 2007, and to allow the Claimant to submit his trial brief on

the same date.

In compliance with CM/ECF Civil Administrative Procedure

II.C.3., the parties hereby certify that they have agreed to have

their names electronically signed to this Joint Motion.

FOR THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

 LEURA G. CANARY

Date: 10-12-07 /s/John T. Harmon 

JOHN T. HARMON

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

United States of America

Date: 10-12-07 /s/Bruce S. Maddox 

BRUCE S. MADDOX

Attorney for Claimant George Edward

Jones, III

Address of Counsel:

For the United States:

Office of the United States Attorney

Middle District of Alabama

131 Clayton Street

Post Office Box 197

Montgomery, Alabama 36101-0197

Telephone: (334) 223-7280

Facsimile: (334) 223-7560

For Claimant:

6728 Taylor Court

Montgomery, Alabama 36117

Telephone: (334) 244-7333

Facsimile: (334) 260-9600

Case 2:06-cv-00736-WKW-SRW Document 37-2 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of First Community Financial Corporation (the Company) for the period ended
September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, James R. McLaughlin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the
operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                            |  |                                                          
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  |  | 
|Date: November 10, 2005 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    JAMES R.
MCLAUGHLIN
|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                            |  | James R. McLaughlin, President andChief Executive Officer



18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

October 3, 2006

NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE

To: ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD

Case Style: David W. Jahn v. Reginald James Washington, et al.

Case Number: 2:06-cv-623-MEF

Referenced Pleading(s): Initial Disclosures filed as Responses to Order

Docket Entry Number(s): 7 & 8

The referenced pleadings were electronically filed on 10/2/2006 in this case and are not in

compliance with the local rules and/or administrative procedures of this court. 

******These pleadings are regarding discovery and are not allowed pursuant to Local Rule

5.1 NON-FILING OF CIVIL DISCOVERY.

The pleadings are hereby STRICKEN from the record and the parties are instructed to

disregard the entry of these pleadings on the court’s docket. Parties should be aware that the

striking of this entry does not affect their responsibilities as to the discovery process.

Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 9 Filed 10/03/2006 Page 1 of 1
1402.170 Acronyms.       A&E Architect & Engineering          ACMIS Acquisition Career Management Information System          AMP Acquisition Manager's Partnership          AMR Acquisition Management Review          AS/PMB Assistant Secretary - Policy, Management and Budget          BPA Blanket Purchase Agreement          BPC Bureau Procurement Chief          CA Competition Advocate          CAAC Civilian Agency Acquisition Council          CAS Cost Accounting Standards          CASB Cost Accounting Standards Board          CBCA Civilian Board of Contract Appeals          CCO Chief of the Contracting Office          CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act          CFR Code of Federal Regulations          CIO Chief Information Officer          CO Contracting Officer          COA Certificate of Appointment          COI Conflicts of Interest          COR Contracting Officer's Representative          COTR Contracting Officer's Technical Representative          DISP Defense Industrial Security Program          DM Departmental Manual          DOI Department of the Interior          DOL Department of Labor          EC Electronic Commerce          FAR Federal Acquisition Regulation          FBMS Financial Business Management System          FPDS - NG Federal Procurement Data System - Next Generation          GAO Government Accountability Office          GIDEP Government-Industry Data Exchange Program          GPE Government Point of Entry          GPO Government Printing Office          GSA General Services Administration          GSBCA General Services Board of Contract Appeals          HCA Head of the Contracting Activity          IT Information Technology          IPMD Interior Property Management Directives          MBDA Minority Business Development Agency          OCIO Office of Chief Information Officer          OIG/IG Office of Inspector General/Inspector General          OFPP Office of Federal Procurement Policy          OHA Office of Hearings and Appeals          OMB Office of Management and Budget          OS Office of the Secretary          OSDBU Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization          PAM Office of Acquisition and Property Management          PMO Property Management Officer          PNM Procurement Negotiation Memorandum          SAT Simplified Acquisition Threshold          SBA Small Business Administration          SBS Small Business Specialist          SOL Office of the Solicitor          TFM Treasury Financial Manual          U.S.C. United States Code          VECP Value Engineering Change Proposal    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1402.1 - Definitions
§ 1040.86 Exceptions to the rules against age discrimination. Normal operation or statutory objective of any program or activity. A recipient is permitted to take an action, otherwise prohibited by § 1040.84, if the action reasonably takes into account age as a factor necessary to the normal operation or the achievement of any statutory objective of a program or activity. An action reasonably takes into account age as a factor necessary to the normal operation of a program or activity if: ( a ) Age is used as a measure or approximation of one or more other characteristics;
( b ) The other characteristic(s) must be measured or approximated in order for the normal operation of the program or activity to continue or to achieve any statutory objective of the program or activity;
( c ) The other characteristic(s) can be reasonably measured or approximated by the use of age; and
( d ) The other characteristic(s) are impractical to measure directly on an individual basis.
# Subpart 642.1—Contract Audit Services

Source:                                82 FR 58351, Dec. 12, 2017, unless otherwise noted.                               

**Parent topic:**PART 642—CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT SERVICES

## 642.101 Contract audit responsibilities.

(b) The Department has an interagency agreement with the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) to perform incurred cost audits on cost-reimbursement contracts. DCAA audits are requested through the A/LM/AQM/BOD/QA Audit Team.
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

No. 11

- 724T

(Filed: August 26, 2014 )

********* *************************** *

*

SEHAT SUTARDJA and WEILI DAI

, *

*

Plaintiffs

, *

*

v. *

*

THE UNITED STATES, *

*

Defendant. *

*

********* *************************** *

ORDER

On J uly 2 , 2014, the Court issued an order e xtend ing discovery ( Dkt. No. 93 )

. As

part of that order, the Court scheduled a telephonic status conference for September 3,

2014 at 2:00 PM. On August 25

, 2014, the parties filed a stipulation wit h respect to

judgment t hat dispose s of the case. Accordingly , the September 3 status conference has

been canceled.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Thomas C. Wheeler

THOMAS C. WHEELER

Judge
Case 2:06-cv-00725-MHT-CSC Document 19 Filed 02/26/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### In the Matter of Herbert Birnbaum, Appellant, v. James M. Power et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, and Gilbert Montano et al., Respondents.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. No opinion. Concur—Stevens P. J., Eager, Tilzer, McNally and Steuer, JJ.
**Exhibit      31.4 **

**CERTIFICATIONS**

| 1)   | I                have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to quarterly report on Form 10-Q                of                Greene County Bancshares, Inc. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2)   | Based                on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement                of a                material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make                the                statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements                were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this                report. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                       |                                                              |                                      |
|--------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                                       |                                                              |
|                                  |                                                         |                                 |
| Date: September              12, 2005 | By:                                                     | /s/ William              F. Richmond |
|                                       | William              F. Richmond                                  |
|                                       | Senior              Vice President, Chief Financial Officer  |
|                                       | and              Assistant Secretary                         |

----
#### Vincent J. Gibney, Respondent, v Geraldine Gibney, Individually and Doing Business as Gerry G. Temp., et al., Appellants.

In an action, *inter alia,*for a divorce, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated May 21, 1980, which denied their motion to dismiss the complaint. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Special Term, the affidavits of the parties at Special Term, and the briefs on *648appeal have treated that part of the motion to dismiss as to the "first”, "second” and "third” causes of action as one for summary judgment; therefore, we will treat that part of the motion as such. (See *Maybrown v Malveme Distrs.,*57 AD2d 548, 549, mot for lv to app den 42 NY2d 804.) We agree with Special Term that the record presents questions of fact concerning the validity of the separation agreement which require a trial. In addition, we find that the allegations in the "fourth” and "fifth” causes of action are legally sufficient. (Cf. *Simonds v Simonds,*45 NY2d 233; *Janke v Janke,*47 AD2d 445, affd 39 NY2d 786, on the opn of Mr. Justice Goldman at the App Div.) Damiani, J. P., Gulotta, Martuscello and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
# 1042.1500 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**PART 1042 - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT SERVICES
# Subpart 648.1—Policies and Procedures

**Parent topic:**PART 648—VALUE ENGINEERING

## 648.102 Policies.

(a) The authority to grant exemptions prescribed in FAR 48.102(a), or to extend future contract savings or sharing pursuant to FAR 48.102(g), is delegated, without power of redelegation, to the head of the contracting activity (see 601.603–70).
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: 12/09/2015

TO: CSAPR Update Proposal Meeting; Docket ID: EPA-HQ-OAR–2015-0500

FROM: Jeremy Mark, EPA

SUBJECT: CSAPR Update Proposal Budget and Allocation Calculations

SUMMARY

A meeting was held between EPA and the below attendees on 12/09/2015 to discuss the 

CSAPR Update Proposal. The proposed CSAPR Updated Proposal was proposed on December 

3, 2015. Meeting materials and sign-in sheets are provided if available.

ATTENDEES

Jeremy Mark, EPA

Mark Janssen, LADCO