alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Subpart 2802.1 - Definitions    **Parent topic:** PART 2802 - DEFINITIONS OF WORDS AND TERMS2802.101 Definitions.       Throughout this chapter, the following words and terms are used as defined in this subpart unless the context in which they appear clearly requires a different meaning, or a different definition is prescribed for a particular part or portion of a part.          (a) *Agency* means the Department of Justice.          (b) *Bureau* means contracting activity. (See “contracting activity” in this subpart.)          (c) *Bureau Procurement Chief* or *BPC* means the supervisory official who is directly responsible for supervising, managing, and directing all contracting offices of the bureau.          (d) *Cardholder* means an individual entrusted with a Government Purchase Card.          (e) *Chief Acquisition Officer* or *CAO* means the official appointed to assist the head of the agency and other agency officials to ensure the mission of the agency is achieved through the management of the agency's acquisition activities.          (f) *Chief of the Contracting Office* means that supervisory official who is directly responsible for supervising, managing and directing a contracting office.          (g) *Contracting activity* means a component within the Department which has been delegated procurement authority to manage contracting functions associated with its mission (see 2801.601(a)).          (h) *Department* or *DOJ* means the Department of Justice.          (i) *Head of the Contracting Activity* or *HCA* means those officials identified in 2801.601(a) having responsibility for supervising, managing, and directing the operations of the contracting activity.          (j) *JAR* means the Department of Justice Acquisition Regulation in this chapter.          (k) *JMD* means the Justice Management Division.          (l) *OIG* means DOJ's Office of the Inspector General.          (m) *Suspension and Debarment Official* or *SDO* means the employee designated to impose suspension and debarment for the Department of Justice.          (n) *Senior Procurement Executive* or *SPE* means the official designated to be responsible for management direction of the Department of Justice procurement system, including implementation of unique procurement policies, regulations, and standards of the Department of Justice.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Integra Bank Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Michael T. Vea
-------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
May 10, 2004

/s/ Charles A. Caswell
-------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
May 10, 2004

                                       31
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of Cavico Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ha Quang Bui, Chief Executive
Officer and Financial Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
that:





(1) This
report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      June KimJune
      Kim
                      Chief
      Financial OfficerDate:  December
      14, 2009
120 STAT. 1758 PUBLIC LAW 109–324—OCT. 11, 2006

Public Law 109–324

109th Congress

An Act

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey certain Federal land to Rio Arriba

County, New Mexico.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rio Arriba County Land Conveyance Act’’.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

In this Act:

(1) COUNTY.—The term ‘‘County’’ means the County of Rio

Arriba, New Mexico.

(2) MAP.—The term ‘‘map’’ means the map entitled ‘‘Alcalde

Proposed Land Transfer’’ and dated September 23, 2004.

(3) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means the Secretary

of the Interior.

SEC. 3. CONVEYANCE OF LAND TO RIO ARRIBA COUNTY, NEW MEXICO.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to valid existing rights, the Secretary

shall convey to the County, without consideration, all right, title,

and interest of the United States in and to the land (including

any improvements to the land) described in subsection (b).

(b) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The land referred to in subsection

(a) consists of approximately 171 acres of land located on the

Sebastian Martin Land Grant in the vicinity of Alcalde, Rio Arriba

County, New Mexico, as depicted on the map.

(c) REVERSION.—If any portion of the land conveyed under

subsection (a) ceases to be used for public purposes the land shall,

at the option of the Secretary, revert to the United States.

(d) CONDITIONS ON SALES.—If the County sells any portion

of the land conveyed to the County under subsection (a)—

(1) the amount of consideration for the sale shall reflect

fair market value, as determined by an appraisal; and

(2) the County shall pay to the Secretary an amount equal

to the gross proceeds of the sale, for use by the Director of

the Bureau of Land Management in the State of New Mexico,

without further appropriation.

Rio Arriba

County Land

Conveyance Act.

Oct. 11, 2006

[S. 213]

PUBLIC LAW 109–324—OCT. 11, 2006 120 STAT. 1759

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 213:

SENATE REPORTS: No. 109–166 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:

Vol. 151 (2005): Nov. 16, considered and passed Senate.

Vol. 152 (2006): Sept. 27, considered and passed House.

Æ

(e) COSTS.—The County shall pay any costs associated with

the conveyance of land under subsection (a).

Approved October 11, 2006.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation
by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-186503) pertaining to the Health Insurance Innovations, Inc. Long Term Incentive Plan of our report dated April 1, 2013, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Health Plan Intermediaries, LLC and subsidiaries d/b/a Health Insurance Innovations, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Health Insurance Innovations, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2012.



/s/ Ernst & Young LLPCertified Public Accountants


Tampa, Florida

April 1, 2013
# Subpart 1032.1 - Non-Commercial Item Purchase Financing

**Parent topic:**PART 1032 - CONTRACT FINANCING

## 1032.113 Customary contract financing.

The specified arrangements are considered customary within Treasury.
# Subpart 2446.5 - Acceptance

**Parent topic:**PART 2446 - QUALITY ASSURANCE

## 2446.502 Responsibility for acceptance.

## 2446.502-70 Contract clause.

The Contracting Officer shall insert the clause at 2452.246-70, Inspection and Acceptance, in all solicitations and contracts.
1552.332-39 Unenforceability of unauthorized obligations (far deviation).       As prescribed in 1513.507(b) and 1532.1070, use clause 1552.332-39 (FAR DEVIATION) instead of the nondeviated version for purchase orders, modifications and contracts that include commercial supplier agreements.                                  Unenforceability of Unauthorized Obligations (FAR Deviation) (OCT 2021)                                  (a) Except as stated in paragraph (b) of this clause, when any supply or service acquired under this contract is subject to any commercial supplier agreement (as defined in 1502.100) that includes any language, provision, or clause requiring the Government to pay any future fees, penalties, interest, legal costs or to indemnify the Contractor or any person or entity for damages, costs, fees, or any other loss or liability that would create an *Anti-Deficiency Act* violation (31 U.S.C. 1341), the following shall govern:                                  (1) Any such language, provision, or clause is unenforceable against the Government.                                  (2) Neither the Government nor any Government authorized end user shall be deemed to have agreed to such language, provision, or clause by virtue of it appearing in the commercial supplier agreement. If the commercial supplier agreement is invoked through an “I agree” click box or other comparable mechanism (*e.g.,* “click-wrap” or “browse-wrap” agreements), execution does not bind the Government or any Government authorized end user to such clause.                                  (3) Any such language, provision, or clause is deemed to be stricken from the commercial supplier agreement.                                  (b) Paragraph (a) of this clause does not apply to indemnification or any other payment by the Government that is expressly authorized by statute and specifically authorized under applicable agency regulations and procedures.                               (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1552.3 - FAR and EPAAR Class Deviations
2401.603-3 Appointment.       (a) Appointments to officials not expressly delegated procurement authority by a published departmental delegation of authority shall be made in writing by the Head of the Contracting Activity. The Certificate of Appointment (SF 1402) shall constitute the appointing official's determination that the appointee meets the selection requirements set forth at 2401.603-2.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2401.6 - Career Development, Contracting Authority, and Responsibilities
#### ROSENZWEIG, Appellant, v. MANES, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 8, 1906.)

Action by Benjamin Rosenzweig against Max Manes.

No opinion. Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed, and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event; on the ground that the plaintiff had made out a case which required the trial to proceed.
2437.204 Guidelines for determining availability of personnel.       (a) The Senior Procurement Executive is the agency head for the purpose of FAR 37.204.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2437.2 - Advisory and Assistance Services
2103.571 Contract clause.

The clause at 2152.203-70 shall be inserted in FEGLI Program contracts and in subcontracts.

Parent topic: Subpart 2103.5 - Other Improper Business Practices
Exhibit 23.2


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS


Board of Directors


New Source Energy Partners Limited Partnership
 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma


We hereby consent to the references to Ralph E. Davis Associates, Inc., to the inclusion of our estimates of reserves contained in our report entitled “New Source Energy Partners Limited Partnership Estimated Reserves and Income as of December 31, 2012” and to the specific references to Ralph E. Davis Associates, Inc. as the independent petroleum engineering firm which appears in the annual report on Form 10-K of New Source Energy Partners Limited Partnership to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on or about March 28, 2013. We hereby further consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-186673) of such information.
 Yours truly,





RALPH E. DAVIS ASSOCIATES, INC.By:
/s/ Allen C. BarronAllen C. Barron, P.E.

President


Houston, Texas


March 26, 2013
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1109 

Honoring Physicians for Peace for its efforts to foster peace and diplomacy 

throughout the world, and paying tribute to the life and achievements 

of its founder, Dr. Charles E. Horton, on the occasion of his death. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 8, 2006 

Mr. BURTON of Indiana submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on International Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring Physicians for Peace for its efforts to foster peace 

and diplomacy throughout the world, and paying tribute 

to the life and achievements of its founder, Dr. Charles 

E. Horton, on the occasion of his death. 

Whereas Physicians for Peace was founded in 1989 as a private, volunteer, non-political, non-sectarian organization 

by Dr. Charles E. Horton; 

Whereas Physicians for Peace is an international, humanitarian, non-profit, medical education organization dedicated to building peace and international friendships in 

developing nations with unmet medical needs and scarce 

resources, through medical education and training, clinical care, and donated medical supplies; 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1109 IH 

Whereas Physicians for Peace has practiced medical diplomacy worldwide by sending teams of qualified volunteers, 

including physicians, dentists, and nurses on medical 

education missions to places where medical care is scarce, 

including Africa, Asia, the Caribbean, Central America, 

Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and beyond; 

Whereas doctors from across the world from have been united 

and given the opportunity to better understand promising 

new medical techniques, as well as different cultures, 

thanks to the efforts of Physicians for Peace; 

Whereas countless numbers of lives have been saved in areas 

where medical care is mediocre at best, and thousands of 

physicians have been trained in the art of medicine, and 

thus are able to help thousands more, thanks to the efforts of Physicians for Peace; and 

Whereas the founder of Physicians for Peace, Dr. Charles E. 

Horton, died on Monday, October 23, 2006: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) honors Physicians for Peace for the impor3 tant work it has performed on behalf of humanity; 

4 (2) thanks Physicians for Peace for its invalu5 able help in fostering peace and diplomacy across 

6 the world; 

7 (3) pays tribute to the life and achievements of 

8 the founder of Physicians for Peace, Dr. Charles E. 

9 Horton; and 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1109 IH 

1 (4) commends Physicians for Peace for carrying 

2 on its efforts in the wake of the death of its founder. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

M IDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABA M A

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

August 22, 2008

NOTICE OF CORRECTION

From: Clerk’s Office

Case Style: Green v. Roberts et al

Case Number: 2:06cv00667-WKW

This Notice of Correction was filed in the referenced case this date to attach a legible copy of

the Exhibit A PDF document . 

The correct PDF document is attached to this notice for your review. Reference is made to

Exhibit A of document # 16 filed on October 25, 2006.

Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 69 Filed 08/22/2008 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 69-2 Filed 08/22/2008 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 69-2 Filed 08/22/2008 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 69-2 Filed 08/22/2008 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 69-2 Filed 08/22/2008 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 69-2 Filed 08/22/2008 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 69-2 Filed 08/22/2008 Page 6 of 6
403.806 Processing suspected violations.

Suspected violations of the requirements of 31 U.S.C. 1352 shall be referred to the Office of

Inspector General in accordance with procedures in Departmental Regulations (1700 series).

Parent topic: Subpart 403.8 - Limitation on the Payment of Funds To Influence Federal

Transactions
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 3 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Monday, March 8, 2010.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sallie Chavez at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7979.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Area 3 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Monday, March 8, 2010, at 2:30 p.m. Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Sallie Chavez. For more information please contact Ms. Chavez at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7979, or write TAP Office, 1000 South Pine Island Road, Suite 340, Plantation, FL 33324, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: February 4, 2010.

Linda Rivera,

Senior Program Analyst, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2010-3171 Filed 2-18-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### Elbert Wilson, Respondent, v International Ocean Transport Corp. et al., Appellants.

Order Supreme Court, New York County, entered on January 9, 1980, unanimously reversed, in the exercise of discretion, and the motion of defendants-appellants for dismissal on the ground of *forum non conveniens*granted, with costs, on condition that, within 20 days after service of the order entered hereon, defendants-appellants shall stipulate to the acceptance of service of process in an action in the State of Texas seeking the same relief as in the instant action and shall waive any defense in the State of Texas based on limitation of . time which may have accrued subsequent to commencement of this action; if not so stipulated, the order appealed from is affirmed, with costs. Plaintiff, a resident of the State of Texas, was injured on a vessel owned and managed by defendants while the vessel was docked in a Texas port. Plaintiff underwent substantial medical treatment, including surgery, in Texas. None of the proposed key witnesses for either party is a resident of the forum State. Additionally, defendants are neither incorporated in New York nor have their principal places of business here. The only alleged nexus between this action and New York is that defendants have an office and place of business here, and are licensed to do business in New York. In analyzing the competing interests of all the parties to this action, it is abundantly clear that there is no substantial nexus with New York, thus rendering it an inconvenient forum. It also matters little that the vessel’s records, which plaintiff-respondent alleges are necessary to prosecute this action, are located in a city closer to New York than to Texas. Plaintiff will be little inconvenienced by relegating this matter to the courts of his home State, the site of the accident. Concur— Murphy, P. J., Sandler, Ross, Silverman and Carro, JJ.
§ 13.33 Witnesses. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, testimony at the hearing shall be given orally by witnesses under oath or affirmation.
( b ) At the discretion of the ALJ, testimony may be admitted in the form of a written statement or deposition. Any such written statement must be provided to all other parties along with the last known address of such witness, in a manner which allows sufficient time for other parties to subpoena such witness for cross-examination at the hearing. Prior written statements of witnesses proposed to testify at the hearing and deposition transcripts shall be exchanged as provided in § 13.22(a).
( c ) The ALJ shall exercise reasonable control over the mode and order of interrogating witnesses and presenting evidence so as to— ( 1 ) Make the interrogation and presentation effective for the ascertainment of the truth;
( 2 ) Avoid needless consumption of time; and
( 3 ) Protect witnesses from harassment or undue embarrassment.
( d ) The ALJ shall permit the parties to conduct such cross-examination as may be required for a full and true disclosure of the facts.
( e ) At the discretion of the ALJ, a witness may be cross-examined on matters relevant to the proceeding without regard to the scope of his or her direct examination. To the extent permitted by the ALJ, cross-examination on matters outside the scope of direct examination shall be conducted in the manner of direct examination and may proceed by leading questions only if the witness is a hostile witness, an adverse party, or a witness identified with an adverse party.
( f ) Upon motion of any party, the ALJ shall order witnesses excluded so that they cannot hear the testimony of other witnesses. This rule does not authorize exclusion of— ( 1 ) A party who is an individual;
( 2 ) In the case of a party that is not an individual, an officer or employee of the party appearing for the entity pro se or designated by the party's representative; or
( 3 ) An individual whose presence is shown by a party to be essential to the presentation of its case, including an individual employed by the Government engaged in assisting the representative for the Government.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

ANDREA T. WILSON, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06cv741-CSC

) (WO)

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL )

SECURITY, )

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

On February 2, 2007, the defendant filed a motion to remand pursuant to sentence four

of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). See Docs. # 13-14. The plaintiff does not object to remand. In addition,

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) and M.D. Ala. LR 73.1, the parties have consented to the

United States Magistrate Judge conducting all proceedings in this case and ordering the entry

of final judgment. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the defendant’s motion to remand (doc. # 13) be and is hereby

GRANTED. It is further

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner be and is hereby

REVERSED and this case be and is hereby REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to

sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings.

Done this 2 day of February 2007. nd

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00741-CSC Document 15 Filed 02/02/07 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cv-00727-WKW-CSC Document 4 Filed 08/28/2006 Page 1 of 1