78968 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 242 / Friday, December 17, 2010 / Notices 

6See Changzhou Wujin Fine Chemical Factory 

Co., Ltd. v. United States, No. 09–00216, Slip Op. 

10–103 (Ct. Int’l Trade Sept. 13, 2010). 

Department calculated a revised 

separate rate of 15.47 percent for Wujin 

Fine and Jiangsu Jianghai relying on a 

second AFA rate that did not require 

corroboration. The CIT sustained the 

Department’s remand redetermination 

on August 5, 2010, and subsequently 

dismissed the case.6

On November 12, 2010, Wujin Fine 

and Jiangsu Jianghai filed an appeal 

with the United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit (‘‘CAFC’’) of the 

CIT’s decision. 

Timken Notice 

In its decision in Timken Co. v. 

United States, 893 F.2d 337, 341 (Fed. 

Cir. 1990) (‘‘Timken’’), the CAFC held 

that, pursuant to section 516A(e) of the 

Act, the Department must publish a 

notice of a court decision that is not ‘‘in 

harmony’’ with a Department 

determination and must suspend 

liquidation of entries pending a 

‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. The CIT’s 

decision of September 13, 2010, 

constitutes a final decision of that court 

that is not in harmony with the 

Department’s Final Determination. This 

notice is published in fulfillment of the 

publication requirements of Timken. In 

the event the CIT’s decision is affirmed 

on appeal, the Department will publish 

an amended final determination 

revising the separate rate assigned to 

Wujin Fine and Jiangsu Jianghai and 

issue revised cash deposit instructions 

to U.S. Customs and Border Protection. 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with section 516A(c)(1) of 

the Act. 

Dated: December 10, 2010. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2010–31756 Filed 12–16–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–821–819] 

Magnesium Metal From the Russian 

Federation: Extension of Time Limit for 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: December 17, 

2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Hermes Pinilla, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 5, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street, and Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–3477. 

Background 

On May 28, 2010, the Department of 

Commerce (the Department) published a 

notice of initiation of an administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on magnesium metal from the Russian 

Federation for the period April 1, 2009, 

through March 31, 2010. See Initiation 

of Antidumping and Countervailing 

Duty Administrative Reviews, 75 FR 

29976 (May 28, 2010). The preliminary 

results of this administrative review are 

currently due no later than December 

31, 2010. 

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary 

Results 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires 

the Department to make a preliminary 

determination within 245 days after the 

last day of the anniversary month of an 

order for which a review is requested 

and a final determination within 120 

days after the date on which the 

preliminary determination is published 

in the Federal Register. If it is not 

practicable to complete the review 

within these time periods, section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the 

Department to extend the time limit for 

the preliminary determination to a 

maximum of 365 days after the last day 

of the anniversary month. 

We determine that it is not practicable 

to complete the preliminary results of 

this review by the current deadline of 

December 31, 2010, because we require 

additional time to analyze a number of 

complex corporate-affiliation issues 

relating to this administrative review. 

Therefore, in accordance with section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.213(h)(2), we are extending the time 

period for issuing the preliminary 

results of this review by 75 days to 

March 16, 2011. 

This notice is published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A) 

and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: December 13, 2010. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2010–31753 Filed 12–16–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–520–803] 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, 

Sheet, and Strip From the United Arab 

Emirates: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the Department) is conducting an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on 

polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, 

and strip (PET Film) from the United 

Arab Emirates (UAE). This review 

covers respondents, JBF RAK LLC (JBF), 

and FLEX Middle East FZE (FLEX), 

producers and exporters of PET Film 

from the UAE. The Department 

preliminarily determines that sales of 

PET Film from the UAE have been made 

below normal value (NV) during the 

November 6, 2008, through October 31, 

2009 period of review. The preliminary 

results are listed below in the section 

titled ‘‘Preliminary Results of Review.’’ 

Interested parties are invited to 

comment on these preliminary results. 

DATES: Effective Date: December 17, 

2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Andrew Huston, or Jun Jack Zhao, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office 6, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–4261 or (202) 482– 

1396, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On November 10, 2008, the 

Department published in the Federal 

Register the antidumping duty order on 

PET Film from the UAE. See 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, 

and Strip From Brazil, the People’s 

Republic of China and the United Arab 

Emirates: Antidumping Duty Orders and 

Amended Final Determination of Sales 

at Less Than Fair Value for the United 

Arab Emirates, 73 FR 66595 (November 

10, 2008) (Order). On November 2, 2009, 

the Department published a notice of 

opportunity to request an administrative 

review of this order. See Antidumping 

or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, 

or Suspended Investigation: 

Opportunity to Request Administrative 

Review, 74 FR 56573 (November 2, 

2009). In response, on November 24, 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES