alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1040.66 Discrimination prohibited. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) No qualified handicapped person shall, on the basis of handicap, be subjected to discrimination employment under any program or activity to which this subpart applies.
( 2 ) A recipient shall make all decisions concerning employment under any program or activity to which this part applies in a manner which ensures that discrimination on the basis of handicap does not occur and may not limit, segregate, or classify applicants or employees in any way that adversely affects their opportunities or status because of handicap.
( 3 ) A recipient may not participate in a contractual or other relationship that has the effect of subjecting qualified handicapped applicants or employees to discrimination prohibited by this subpart. The relationships referred to in this paragraph include relationships with employment and referral agencies, labor unions, organizations providing or administering fringe benefits to employees of the recipient, and organizations providing training and apprenticeships.
( b ) *Specific activities.* The provisions of this subpart apply to: ( 1 ) Recruitment, advertising, and processing of applications for employment;
( 2 ) Hiring, upgrading, promotion, award of tenure, demotion, transfer, layoff, termination, right of return from layoff, and rehiring;
( 3 ) Rates of pay or any other form of compensation and changes in compensation;
( 4 ) Job assignments, job classifications, organizational structures, position descriptions, lines of progression, and seniority lists;
( 5 ) Leaves of absence, sick or otherwise;
( 6 ) Fringe benefits available by virtue of employment, whether administered by the recipient or not;
( 7 ) Selection and provision of financial support for training, including apprenticeship, professional meetings, conferences, and other related activities, and selection for leaves of absence to pursue training;
( 8 ) Employer sponsored activities, including those that are social or recreational; and
( 9 ) Any other term, condition, or privilege of employment.
( c ) A recipient's obligation to comply with this subpart is not affected by any inconsistent term of any collective bargaining agreement to which it is a party.
[45 FR 40515, June 13, 1980, as amended at 68 FR 51347, Aug. 26, 2003]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

DANETTE COLAGRECO,

Petitioner

v.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (VANGUARD GROUP INC.),

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 305 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 3rd day of November, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
NOT RECOMMENDED F OR FUL L -TEXT PUB L I CATI ON File Na me: 13a0131n.06 No. 12-5794 UNI TED STATES COURT OF A PPEAL S FOR THE SI XTH CI RCUI T UNI TED STATES OF AMERI CA, Plaintiff-Appellee ,

v. ERNEST WOODRUFF , Def endant- Appellant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEALFROM THE U NI TED STATES DI STRI CT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DI STRI CT OF TENNESSEE

Be fore : MARTI

N and SUTTON , Circuit J udg es; HOOD , District J udg e. *

PER CUR I AM

. Ernest Woodruff, a pro se fede ral prisoner, appea ls a district court order denying his motion for lea ve to file a

delayed dire ct appe al. Woodruff pleade d g uilty to thr ee counts of aidingand abe tting an a rmed ba nk robber y and two counts of brandishing a firea rm in further ance of a crime of violence. On Februa ry 13, 2006, the district court sentenc ed Woodruff to a total term of 462 months of imprisonment. Woodruff did not file a notice of appea l. On May 18, 2012, Woodruff filed a motion fo r p er mission to file a delay ed direc t appea l, asser ting that his attorney had not filed a notice of appea l even though he had reque sted that counsel do so. The district court denied the motion, noting that the period for filing

a notice of appea l had expired more than six y ear s ag o. On appea l, Woodruff raises arguments perta ining to h i s co n v i ct i o ns and sentenc es. He also contends that his attorney ’s failure to file a notice of a

ppeal de prived him of due pr ocess.

The Honora

ble J oseph M

. Ho od, United States District J udg e for the Easter n District of * Kentucky , sitti ng by

desig nation.No. 12-5794 - 2 - We revie w the denial of an extension of time in which to file a notice of appea l for an abuse of discre tion. United States v. Dotz , 455 F.3d 644, 647 (6th Cir. 2006). The district court did not abuse its di s cretion beca

use t he court is authorized to extend the t ime for filing a notice of appea l for only thirty day s following the expiration of the fourtee n-day period for filing a timely notice of appea l. See Fe d. R. App. P. 4(b)( 1)(A) , (b)( 4). This time had alre ady expired when Woodruff filed his motion. Be cause the district court was not authorized to g rant W oodruff ’s motion under the applicable rules of appellate proce dure, it committed no abuse of discretion in denying the motion. Woodruff’s substantive argument s are not proper ly befor e us beca use Woodruff did not timely appea l his judgment of c onviction. The district cour

t’s order is affirme d.
MINUTES 

 I N T H E U N IT E D S T A T E S D I S T R I C T C O U R T FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

HON. CHARLES S. COODY, MAG JUDGE AT Montgomery, Alabama

DATE COMMENCED: 12/ 1/ 06 AT 9:22 a.m. - 9:25 a.m.

DATE COMPLETED: 12/ 1/ 06 TO Digital Recorded

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA *

 *

*

VS. * CASE NO. 2:06CR-200-WHA

*

ROSA RINCON *

*

Defendant *

GOVERNMENT APPEARANCES: DEFEN DAN T

Atty. Christopher Snyder * Atty. Jay Lewis

*

COURT OFFICIALS PRESENT:

Court Room Deputy: Wanda Stinson Law Clerk: Corrie Long

Court Reporter: Risa Entrekin Interpreter: Beverly Childress

 

( ) NON-JURY TRIAL

(X) OTHER PROCEEDINGS: ORAL ARGUEMENT RE: MOTION TO DISMISS

9:22 a.m. Court convenes; parties present as noted; 

AUSA Snyder addresses the court re; research on the statute; Discovered that there was a Dept of

Justice memorandum issued in 1978 that states that it’s the opinion of the office of legal counsel that

this statute is unconstitutional unless brought in the district the offense occurred because it violates the

venue clause; It’s still the policy of the Dept. of Justice; Pursuant to that policy, Govt. will be

dismissing count 2;

Court response - it’s a trial defense; 

Atty. Snyder - will file something with the court dismissing that charge;

Atty. Lewis addresses the court as to whether statute of limitations must be waived;

Court response ;

9.25 a.m. Court is recessed.

Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 86 Filed 12/01/2006 Page 1 of 1
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

59–011 2006

109th Congress, 2d Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 109–152 

CERTIFICATION FOR AN EXPORT TO THE 

PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA 

COMMUNICATION 

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRANSMITTING

CERTIFICATION THAT THE EXPORT TO THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC 

OF CHINA OF THE SPECIFIED ITEMS IS NOT DETRIMENTAL TO 

THE UNITED STATES SPACE LAUNCH INDUSTRY, AND THAT THE 

MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING ANY INDIRECT TECHNICAL BENEFIT THAT COULD BE DERIVED FROM SUCH EXPORTS, WILL NOT MEASURABLY IMPROVE THE MISSILE OR 

SPACE LAUNCH CAPABILITIES OF THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF 

CHINA, PURSUANT TO PUB. L. 105–261, SEC. 1512 

NOVEMBER 15, 2006.—Referred to the Committee on International 

Relations and ordered to be printed 


hmoore on PROD1PC60 with REPORTSE:\Seals\Congress.#13

hmoore on PROD1PC60 with REPORTS
(1) 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, November 15, 2006. 

Hon. J. DENNIS HASTERT, 

Speaker of the House of Representatives, 

Washington, DC. 

DEAR MR. SPEAKER: In accordance with the provisions of section 

1512 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

1999 (Public Law 105–261), I hereby certify that the export to the 

People’s Republic of China of the following items are not detrimental to the U.S. space launch industry and that the material and 

equipment, including any indirect technical benefit that could be 

derived from such exports, will not measurably improve the missile 

or space launch capabilities of the People’s Republic of China: 

• 110,000 pounds of fine grain bulk graphite to be distributed to seven companies in the People’s Republic of China for 

machining into industrial components; and 

• A motorized mixer with a stainless steel vacuum mixing 

tank to Dow Corning (Shanghai) Company in the People’s Republic of China. 

Sincerely, 

GEORGE W. BUSH. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC60 with REPORTS
§ 985.155 Identification of oil by producer. Following the distillation of oil and prior to delivery either to a handler for handling as salable oil or to the Committee or its designee for storage as excess oil, each producer shall furnish the following information to the Committee: *Provided,* That any class of oil retained by a producer shall be reported to the Committee within 15 days following the completion of its distillation. ( a ) Producer's name and address;
( b ) Date the oil was put into the drum;
( c ) Class of oil in the drum;
( d ) Drum identification number;
( e ) Approximate net weight of the oil;
( f ) Handler's pickup receipt number, when applicable;
( g ) Destination of oil for storage;
( h ) Name of the firm where the oil was distilled; and
( i ) Name of the person submitting the information.
[46 FR 43130, Aug. 27, 1981]
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Clarence Perkins, Appellant, v. Warden, Queens House of Detention for Men, Respondent.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated July 17, 1968, affirmed, without costs. Concededly, an available avenue is open to relator to test the validity of the identification procedures. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                           75067
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   275000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    275000
<INVENTORY>                                       5325
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                146392
<PP&E>                                           17993
<DEPRECIATION>                                    6670
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  157715
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            91277
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         83
<COMMON>                                         45886
<OTHER-SE>                                     8927765
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    157715
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                5
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                119296
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (119296)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (120096)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (120096)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.00)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
  (1)
    
    the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Periodic
Report) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 (2)
    
    information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Patriot Coal Corporation.
 Dated: February 24, 2010
 /s/ Richard M. WhitingRichard M. WhitingChief Executive Officer
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 182 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                  House Calendar No. 17
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 182

                          [Report No. 109-28]

Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 686) for the relief of the 
                   parents of Theresa Marie Schiavo.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

              March 21 (legislative day of March 20), 2005

    Mr. Gingrey from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 686) for the relief of the 
                   parents of Theresa Marie Schiavo.

    Resolved, That immediately upon the adoption of this resolution it 
shall be in order without intervention of any point of order to 
consider in the House the bill (S. 686) for the relief of the parents 
of Theresa Marie Schiavo. The bill shall be considered as read. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill to final 
passage without intervening motion except: (1) ten minutes of debate on 
the bill equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary; and (2) one motion 
to commit.




                                                  House Calendar No. 17

109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 182

                          [Report No. 109-28]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 686) for the relief of the 
                   parents of Theresa Marie Schiavo.

_______________________________________________________________________

               March 21 (legislative day, March 20), 2005

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Springhill
Lkae Investors Limited Partnership 1999 Third Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000763399
<NAME> SPRINGHILL LAKE INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,848
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         105,268
<DEPRECIATION>                                  52,432
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  63,139
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         55,928
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        (53)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    63,139
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,887
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,287
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,034
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,108
<EPS-BASIC>                                      1,622<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>


</TABLE>
FIL ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTHCI RCUI T AUGUST 15, 2011 J OHN L EY CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE U

NITED STATE S COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 0- 11 82 0 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock etNo. 8 :0 9- cr-0 05 34 -RAL-AEP-2 UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll ee, ve rs us SHIRLEY DANIELS, a.k .a. Mi ss Sh el ly ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll Defen da nt -Ap pe ll an t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt forth e Mi dd le Dis tri ctof F lo rid a
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ (Au gu st15 , 20 11 ) Befo re EDMONDSON, HULL andPRYOR, Ci rcu itJu dg es . PER CURI AM:R. Sco ttAndrin ga , app oi nt edco un se l fo r Sh irl ey Dani el s, i n thi s d ire ct cri m in al ap pe al , has m ov edto withd raw fro m furth er re pr es en ta ti onof t he ap pe ll an t an d fi le d abri ef p ur su an t t o And er s v. C al if orni a , 38 6 U.S. 7 38 , 87 S.Ct . 13 96 , 18 L.Ed.2d49 3 (1 96 7) . Our i nd ep en de ntrev ie w of the en ti re re co rdrev eal s th atco un se l’s as se ss m en t o f th e rel at iv e m eri t o f th e ap pe al is co rrec t. Bec au se in de pe nd en t ex am in at io n o f th e en ti re rec or d re ve al s n o a rg uabl e is su es of m eri t, co un se l’s m ot io n t o wi th dr aw is GRANTED , andDani el s’s co nv ic ti onan d se nt en ce ar e AFFIRMED .

2
----

**Citizens        Financial Corp.**

**Certification        Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley **

**Act        of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

| 1. | the                    Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the company for the quarterly                    period                    ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange                    Commission on the date hereof (the “report”) fully complies with the                    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                    Act of                    1934; and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the                  information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  company. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  |                    11/08/06 |   | /s/                  Thomas K. Derbyshire    |
|--------|----------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|   |                             |   | Thomas                  K. Derbyshire        |
|   |                             |   | Vice                  President, Treasurer   |
|   |                             |   | Principal                  Financial Officer |

----
Wachovia
                Securities8739
                Research Drive, URP4Charlotte,
                NC 28288













**1123
        SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE**
 Reference
          is hereby made to that certain Trust and Servicing Agreement dated as of
          October
          1, 2006, by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving
          Corporation, as Depositor, Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Master
          Servicer, Capmark Finance, INC, as Master Servicer, J.E. Robert
          Compancy, INC, as Special Servicer, LaSalle Bank National Association,
          as
          Trustee and Paying Agent, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
          Certificates, CD 2006-CD3 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein
          not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the
          Agreement.
 
 Pursuant
          to Section 10.11 of this Agreement, Timothy Ryan and Marilyn Addison, Managing
          Director of Customer Relationship Management and Director of Compliance
          Third
          Party Oversight, do hereby certify that:
 
 1.
              A
                  review of the activities of the Certifying Servicer during the
                  period from October 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006, and of its performance
                  under the Agreement during such period has been made under our
                  supervision; and 
 2.
              To
                  the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Certifying
                  Servicer
                  has fulfilled all of its material obligations under this Agreement
                  in all
                  material respects throughout the period October 1, 2006 through
                  December
                  31, 2006; and
 IN
        WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certificate as of the
        10th
        day of March 2007.
 
 
 /s/
                  Timothy Ryan
              /s/
                  Marilyn AddisonTimothy
                  Ryan, Managing Director
              Marilyn
                  Addison, DirectorWachovia
                  Bank National Association
              Wachovia
                  Bank National Association
 
 
 O:\Shared/SP/Income/Compliance
                      3rdParty Oversight/Annual Certification/Certification_0307/2006/CGCMT
                      2006-C5