alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1304.113 Privacy Act training. ( a ) The Board shall ensure that all persons involved in the design, development, operation, or maintenance of any Board systems are informed of all requirements necessary to protect the privacy of individuals. The Board shall ensure that all employees having access to records receive adequate training in their protection and that records have adequate and proper storage with sufficient security to ensure their privacy.
( b ) All employees shall be informed of the civil remedies provided under 5 U.S.C. 552a(g)(1) and other implications of the Privacy Act and of the fact that the Board may be subject to civil remedies for failure to comply with the provisions of the Privacy Act and the regulations in this part.
Exhibit 32.2



Citizens Financial Corp.



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley

Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



I,
Thomas K. Derbyshire, Vice President, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of Citizens Financial Corp. (the company) certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



|1. | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|      |  |          |  |                            
|----- |  | -------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date: |  | 11/10/04 |  |                            
|      |  |         
|      |  |          |  | /s/ Thomas K. Derbyshire   
|      |  |          |  | Thomas K. Derbyshire       
|      |  |          |  | Vice President, Treasurer  
|      |  |          |  | Principal Financial Officer



31
Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 14 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 1 of 1
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-30330 Conference Calendar

JERRY CARROLL, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus GLOBAL MARINE DRILLING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 96-CV-563

- - - - - - - - - - February 11, 1998 Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jerry Carroll appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Global Marine Drilling that dismissed his suit alleging negligence under the Jones Act, pursuant to 46 U.S.C. § 688, and unseaworthiness. He argues that he had shown genuine issues of material fact concerning whether Global Marine had failed to provide him with a safe work environment and had failed to supervise employees properly. We have reviewed the record and the briefs, and find that asNo. 97-30330 -2- Carroll failed to allege any facts demonstrating that Global Marine had failed to exercise that amount of care that a reasonable, prudent person would in similar circumstances, Global Marine was entitled to judgment as a matter of law with regard to the Jones Act claim. See Gautreaux v. Scurlock Marine, Inc. , 107 F. 3d 331, 335, 338 (5th Cir. 1997)(en banc); Robinson v. Zapata , 664 F.2d 45, 48-49 (5th Cir. 1981). Similarly, as Carroll did not allege any facts showing that unsafe work methods rendered the “High Island II” an unseaworthy vessel or that unseaworthiness played a substantial part in bringing about or actually causing his injury, Global Marine was also entitled to summary judgment with regard to the unseaworthiness claim. See Phillips v. Western Co. of North America , 953 F.2d 923, 928 (5th Cir. 1992).
AFFIRMED.
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/25

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 25 Aug 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.44 N 77.04 W Meters AGL
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

August 6, 2009 

0720 

Order 

 

August 6, 2009 

138825 

IN RE STANLEY BEDNARZ TRUST 

_________________________________________ 

EVA SMIGIELSKI, 

Petitioner-Appellant, 

v SC: 138825 

 COA: 289372 

Macomb CC: 2008-003296-AV 

LUCYNA M. GLANTY, a/k/a LUCYNA M. 

GALANTY, 

Respondent-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 15, 2009 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Case 2:06-mj-00082-SRW Document 3 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### Bricmar Manufacturing Corporation, Respondent, v. National Dynamics Corp., Appellant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 10, 1966, modified, on the facts, by striking out the sum of $24,000 and by substituting therefor the sum of $23,980 and by modifying the other provisions accordingly. Findings of fact inconsistent herewith are reversed and new findings are made as indicated herein. As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs. The implied finding that defendant made no payments is modified since defendant did pay $20 for 10 units. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.
§ 1707.101 Scope and purpose. ( a ) This part sets forth policies and procedures you must follow when you submit a demand or request to an employee of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB) to produce official records and information, or provide testimony relating to official information, in connection with a legal proceeding. You must comply with these requirements when you request the release or disclosure of official records and information.
( b ) The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board intends these provisions to: ( 1 ) Promote economy and efficiency in its programs and operations;
( 2 ) Minimize the possibility of involving DNFSB in controversial issues not related to our functions;
( 3 ) Maintain DNFSB's impartiality among private litigants where DNFSB is not a named party; and
( 4 ) Protect sensitive, confidential information and the deliberative processes of DNFSB.
( c ) In providing for these requirements, DNFSB does not waive the sovereign immunity of the United States.
( d ) This part provides guidance for the internal operations of DNFSB. It does not create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, that a party may rely upon in any legal proceeding against the United States.
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 36-3 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 1 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 36-3 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 2 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 36-3 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 3 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 36-3 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 4 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 36-3 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 5 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 36-3 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 6 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 36-3 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 7 of 7
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Emilio Diaz, Appellant.

by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered September 27, 1978, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of defendant’s motion to suppress physical evidence. Judgment reversed, on the law, motion granted, plea vacated indictment dismissed, and case remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for the *641purpose of entering an order in its discretion pursuant to CPL 160.50. Although the ultimate burden of proof in a suppression hearing lies with the defendant, it is the People who have the burden of coming forward in the first instance and demonstrating the legality of the underlying police conduct (see *People v Wise,*46 NY2d 321, 329; *People v Quinones,*61 AD2d 765). Given the foregoing, it is our view that the People have failed to sustain their initial evidentiary burden of justifying the stop of the automobile in which the defendant was riding as a passenger (see *People v Sobotker,*43 NY2d 559, 563), and it is for this reason that the judgment must be reversed, the motion to suppress granted, the plea vacated and the indictment dismissed. Damiani, J. P., Gibbons, Gulotta and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Julia BB. and Others, Children Alleged to be Severely Abused, Repeatedly Abused, Abused and/or Neglected. Saratoga County Department of Social Services, Appellant; Diana BB., Respondent. In the Matter of Julia BB. and Others, Children Alleged to be Severely Abused, Repeatedly Abused, Abused and/or Neglected. Saratoga County Department of Social Services, Appellant; Francis BB., Respondent.

(Proceeding No. 1.)

Submitted December 31, 2007;

decided January 10, 2008

Reported below, 42 AD3d 208.

*1017Motion by the Cattaraugus County Department of Social Services et al. for leave to appear amici curiae on the motion for leave to appeal herein dismissed as untimely *(see*Rules of Ct of Appeals [22 NYCRR] § 500.23 [a] [3]).
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Maurice Faucette, Appellant.

Judgment Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered on March 7, 1980, unanimously affirmed. The case is remitted to the Supreme Court, Bronx County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). Concur—Birns, J. P., Sullivan, Markewich, Lupiano and Silverman, JJ.
#### In re VANDERPOEL.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

December 11, 1914.)

In the matter of Augustus G. Vanderpoel.

No opinion. Referred to Hon. John J. Freedman, official referee. Settle order on notice.
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 78 FR 34247, June 7, 2013.

§ 1.45 Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research. The Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research— ( a ) Plans, recommends, and implements programs of nuclear regulatory research, standards development, and resolution of generic safety issues for nuclear power plants and other facilities regulated by the NRC;
( b ) Coordinates research activities within and outside the agency including appointment of staff to committees and conferences; and
( c ) Coordinates NRC participation in international standards-related activities and national volunteer standards efforts, including appointment of staff to committees.
[52 FR 31602, Aug. 21, 1987, as amended at 63 FR 69544, Dec. 17, 1998]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM OUR SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         2,484
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         5,410
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                   0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   12,110
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                        26,771
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                          26,782
<LOANS>                                       73,738
<ALLOWANCE>                                      708
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               124,551
<DEPOSITS>                                   110,669
<SHORT-TERM>                                     751
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              588
<LONG-TERM>                                      358
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       3,716
<OTHER-SE>                                     8,469
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               124,551
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                1,697
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                531
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  71
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               2,298
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               980
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               988
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          1,310
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     55
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                23
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  798
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  645
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       645
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                     436
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   1.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   1.14
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                  4.83
<LOANS-NON>                                      105
<LOANS-PAST>                                     219
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 623
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     34
<RECOVERIES>                                       4
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                708
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             708
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            0
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Centenary International Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2013,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carlos Fabian De Sousa, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                     
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Carlos Fabian De Sousa

Carlos Fabian De Sousa

Chief Executive Officer

November 19, 2013



A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certifications are accompanying the
Company's Form 10-Q solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,
chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and are not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
----

**ATP Website**- About the ATP
How to Apply

        Submitting Proposals        Submitting Pre-Proposalshref="/atp/guidei2.htm">        **Submitting Program Ideas**        Resources for Proposal         Writers        Requesting Information
Competitions

Focused Program

Funded Projects
ATP Offices and Staff

R&D Alliances

News, Publications, and Conferences

ATP Successes

Career Opportunities

Site Index

Search Our Website

Return to Main Page.

Last Update:  July 27, 2000
Case 3:06-cv-00742-MEF-WC Document 2 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-00742-MEF-WC Document 2 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of Lawrence E. Elovich, Appellant, v. William D. Meisser et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of Nassau County and Morton J. Leben et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding to invalidate petitions designating respondents Leben and Organ as candidates in the Democratic Party Primary Election to be held on June 17, 1969 for the Party position of County Committeeman for the 21st Election District of the 14th Assembly District of the County of Nassau, and for injunctive relief, petitioner appeals from .an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered June 5, 1969, which denied the application and dismissed the petition in the proceeding. Order reversed, on the law, without costs, and proceeding remitted to the Special Term for (1) a hearing of the objections to the designating petitions and (2) a new determination *(Matter of Elovich*v. *Meisser,*32 A D 2d 795). No questions of fact were considered on this appeal. Hopkins, Benjamin and Martuseello, JJ., concur; Beldock, P. J., and Rabin, J., dissent and vote to affirm the order, for the reasons set forth in their dissenting memorandum in *Matter of Elovich*v. *Meisser*(32 A D 2d 795).
```

[109th Congress Public Law 323]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ323.109]

[[Page 120 STAT. 1757]]

Public Law 109-323
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To extend the waiver authority for the Secretary of Education under 
     title IV, section 105, of Public Law 109-148. <<NOTE: Oct. 11, 
                         2006 -  [H.R. 6106]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.

    Section 105 of title IV of division B of Public Law 109-148 (119 
Stat. 2797) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b), by inserting ``and, at the discretion 
        of the Secretary, for fiscal year 2007'' after ``2006''; and
            (2) in subsection (c)(2)--
                    (A) by inserting ``or 2007'' after ``fiscal year 
                2006''; and
                    (B) by striking ``fiscal year 2007'' and inserting 
                ``for the respective succeeding fiscal year''.

    Approved October 11, 2006.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 6106:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):
            Sept. 27, considered and passed House.
            Sept. 29, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
2842.703-2 Certificate of indirect costs.       The HCA or designee is the agency head for the purposes of FAR 42.703-2(b).    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2842.7 - Indirect Cost Rates
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 37 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 37 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 37 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00735-MHT-CSC Document 2 Filed 08/15/2006 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00735-MHT-CSC Document 2 Filed 08/15/2006 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00735-MHT-CSC Document 2 Filed 08/15/2006 Page 3 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00735-MHT-CSC Document 2 Filed 08/15/2006 Page 4 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00735-MHT-CSC Document 2 Filed 08/15/2006 Page 5 of 5
SUBCHAPTER A - GENERAL

PART 2900 [RESERVED]

PART 2901 - DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ACQUISITION REGULATION SYSTEM

PART 2902 - DEFINITIONS OF WORDS AND TERMS

PART 2903 - IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF

INTEREST

PART 2904 - ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS

PART 2900 [RESERVED]

PART 2901 - DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ACQUISITION REGULATION SYSTEM

Subpart 2901.0 - Scope of Subpart

2901.001 Scope of part.

Subpart 2901.1 - Purpose, Authority, Issuance

2901.101 Purpose.

2901.103 Authority.

2901.105-2 Arrangement of regulations.

2901.105-3 Copies.

Subpart 2901.2 - Administration

2901.201-1 Maintenance of the FAR.

Subpart 2901.3 - Agency Acquisition Regulations

2901.302 Limitations.

2901.304 Agency control and compliance procedures.

Subpart 2901.4 - Deviations From the FAR and DOLAR

2901.403 Individual deviations from the FAR.

2901.404 Class deviations.

2901.405 Deviations pertaining to treaties and executive agreements.

Subpart 2901.6 - Career Development, Contracting Authority, and Responsibilities

2901.601 General.

2901.602 Contracting officers.

2901.602-1 Authority.

2901.602-3 Ratification of unauthorized commitments.

2901.603 Selection, appointment, and termination of appointment.

2901.603-1 General.

2901.603-3 Appointment.

2901.603-4 Terminations.

2901.603-70 Responsibility of other government personnel.

2901.603-71 Contracting Officer's Technical Representatives (COTR).

2901.603-72 Administrative procurement management reviews.

Subpart 2901.7 - Determinations and Findings

2901.707 Signatory authority.

PART 2902 - DEFINITIONS OF WORDS AND TERMS

Subpart 2.1 - Definitions

2902.101 Definitions.

PART 2903 - IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Subpart 2903.1 - Safeguards

2903.101 Standards of conduct.

2903.101-1 General.

2903.104 Procurement integrity.
2903.104-3 Definitions.

2903.104-5 Disclosure, protection, and marking of contractor bid or proposal

information and source selection information.

2903.104-7 Violations or possible violations of standards of conduct.

Subpart 2903.2 - Contractor Gratuities to Government Personnel

2903.203 Reporting suspected violations of the Gratuities clause.

2903.204 Treatment of violations.

Subpart 2903.6 - Contracts With Government Employees or Organizations Owned or

Controlled by Them

2903.601 Policy.

2903.602 Exceptions.

PART 2904 - ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS

Subpart 2904.8 - Government Contract Files

2904.800-70 Contents of contract files.
Case 2:06-cr-00205-WHA-CSC Document 23 Filed 09/25/2006 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:06-cr-00205-WHA-CSC Document 23 Filed 09/25/2006 Page 2 of 9
Case 2:06-cr-00205-WHA-CSC Document 23 Filed 09/25/2006 Page 3 of 9
Case 2:06-cr-00205-WHA-CSC Document 23 Filed 09/25/2006 Page 4 of 9
Case 2:06-cr-00205-WHA-CSC Document 23 Filed 09/25/2006 Page 5 of 9
Case 2:06-cr-00205-WHA-CSC Document 23 Filed 09/25/2006 Page 6 of 9
Case 2:06-cr-00205-WHA-CSC Document 23 Filed 09/25/2006 Page 7 of 9
Case 2:06-cr-00205-WHA-CSC Document 23 Filed 09/25/2006 Page 8 of 9
Case 2:06-cr-00205-WHA-CSC Document 23 Filed 09/25/2006 Page 9 of 9
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

OWEN J. ROGAL, D.D.S., )

P.C. d/b/a THE PAIN CENTER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 3:06cv728-MHT

) 

SKILSTAF, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion for summary judgment

(Doc. No. 38) is set for submission, without oral

argument, on June 4, 2007, with any opposing brief and

evidentiary materials due by said date.

DONE, this the 18th day of May, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 42 Filed 05/18/2007 Page 1 of 1