alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1052 Reported in House (RH)]







                                                 House Calendar No. 241
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1052

                          [Report No. 109-696]

   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5825) to update the 
             Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 28, 2006

    Mr. Putnam, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5825) to update the 
             Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order without intervention of any point of order to consider in the 
House the bill (H.R. 5825) to update the Foreign Intelligence 
Surveillance Act of 1978. In lieu of the amendments recommended by the 
Committee on the Judiciary and the Permanent Select Committee on 
Intelligence now printed in the bill, the amendment in the nature of a 
substitute printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying 
this resolution shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, 
shall be considered as read. The previous question shall be considered 
as ordered on the bill, as amended, to final passage without 
intervening motion except: (1) 90 minutes of debate, with 60 minutes 
equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on the Judiciary and 30 minutes equally divided 
and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence; and (2) one motion to 
recommit with or without instructions.
    Sec. 2. During consideration of H.R. 5825 pursuant to this 
resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the 
Chair may postpone further consideration of the bill to a time 
designated by the Speaker.
                                                 House Calendar No. 241

109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 1052

                          [Report No. 109-696]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5825) to update the 
             Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 28, 2006

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
Exhibit 15.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8
No. 333-190918; Form S-8 No. 333-212441) of securities to be offered to employees in employee benefit plans of Qiwi plc
of our report dated March 22, 2017, relating to the financial statements of QIWI plc and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of QIWI plc, included in this Annual Report on Form
20-F of QIWI plc for the year ended December 31, 2016.



|                     
|---------------------
|/s/ Ernst & Young LLC

Moscow, Russia

March 22,
2017
§ 13.21 Discovery. ( a ) The following types of discovery are authorized: ( 1 ) Requests for production of documents for inspection and copying;
( 2 ) Requests for admissions of the authenticity of any relevant document or of the truth of any relevant fact;
( 3 ) Written interrogatories; and
( 4 ) Depositions.
( b ) For the purpose of this section and §§ 13.22 and 13.23, the term “documents” includes information, documents, reports, answers, records, accounts, papers, and other data and documentary evidence. Nothing contained herein shall be interpreted to require the creation of a document.
( c ) Unless mutually agreed to by the parties, discovery is available only as ordered by the ALJ. The ALJ shall regulate the timing of discovery.
( d ) *Motions for discovery.* ( 1 ) A party seeking discovery may file a motion with the ALJ. Such a motion shall be accompanied by a copy of the requested discovery, or in the case of depositions, a summary of the scope of the proposed deposition.
( 2 ) Within ten days of service, a party may file an opposition to the motion and/or a motion for protective order as provided in § 13.24.
( 3 ) The ALJ may grant a motion for discovery only if he or she finds that the discovery sought— ( i ) Is necessary for the expeditious, fair, and reasonable consideration of the issues;
( ii ) Is not unduly costly or burdensome;
( iii ) Will not unduly delay the proceeding; and
( iv ) Does not seek privileged information.
( 4 ) The burden of showing that discovery should be allowed is on the party seeking discovery.
( 5 ) The ALJ may grant discovery subject to a protective order under § 13.24.
( e ) *Depositions.* ( 1 ) If a motion for deposition is granted, the ALJ shall issue a subpoena for the deponent, which may require the deponent to produce documents. The subpoena shall specify the time and place at which the deposition will be held.
( 2 ) The party seeking to depose shall serve the subpoena in the manner prescribed in § 13.8.
( 3 ) The deponent may file with the ALJ a motion to quash the subpoena or a motion for a protective order within ten days of service.
( 4 ) The party seeking to depose shall provide for the taking of a verbatim transcript of the deposition, which it shall make available to all other parties for inspection and copying.
( f ) Each party shall bear its own costs of discovery.
#### Esther Rolnick, as Administratrix of the Estate of Julius Rolnick, Deceased, Appellant, v. 25th Avenue Building Corp., Respondent.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered November 23, 1965, in favor of defendant upon a jury verdict, reversed, on the law, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. The questions of fact have not been considered. The plaintiff’s decedent, a locksmith, sustained personal injuries when he fell from the first floor into the cellar while installing a lock on a door in a house under construction by defendant as owner and general contractor. It is claimed that his death several years later was due to the injuries he thus received. The door opened out from the stairwell, into which, it appears, a stairway and landings had not yet been installed. The work the decedent was doing required that the door be open and there was no railing or other barrier across the doorway to the stairwell, which was fully enclosed on its other sides. The charge of the court left it to the jury to decide whether this stairwell was the kind of opening with respect to which defendant owed plaintiff any legal duty, without- making reference to applicable statutes (Labor Law, §§ 240, 241-a) and rules (§§ 23-3.9 and 23-3.24 of the State Industrial Code adopted by the State Board of Standards and Appeals; *84512 NYCRR 23.3 [i]; [x]; and certain analogous rules adopted by the New York City Board of Standards and Appeals) and refusing a request by plaintiff to charge with respect thereto. This was prejudicial error, inasmuch as defendant was under a nondelegable duty to exercise reasonable care to provide the deceased with a safe place to work *(Wohlfron*v. *Brooklyn Edison Co.,*238 App. Div. 463, affd. 263 N. Y. 547; *Hess*v. *Bernheimer & Schwartz Pilsener Brewing Co.,*219 N. Y. 415; *Employers Mut. Liab. Ins. Co.*v. *Di Cesare & Monaco Concrete Constr. Corp.,*9 A D 2d 379); and a violation of the stated rules, if found, would constitute some evidence of negligence, which plaintiff was entitled to have submitted to the jury to consider *(Conte*v. *Large Scale Development Corp.,*10 N Y 2d 20, 29; *Vallina*v. *Wright & Kremers,*7 A D 2d 101, 108-109). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Rabin, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.
§ 990.22 USDA hemp producer license approval. ( a ) A license shall not be issued unless: ( 1 ) The application submitted for USDA review and approval is complete and accurate.
( 2 ) The criminal history report(s) submitted with the license application confirms that all key participants to be covered by the license have not been convicted of a felony, under State or Federal law, relating to a controlled substance within the past ten (10) years unless the exception in § 990.20(b) applies.
( 3 ) The applicant, if the applicant was previously or is currently licensed, submitted all reports required as a participant in the hemp production program by this part.
( 4 ) The application contains no materially false statements or misrepresentations and the applicant has not previously submitted an application with any materially false statements or misrepresentations.
( 5 ) The applicant's license is not currently suspended, if the applicant is currently licensed.
( 6 ) The applicant is not applying for a license as a stand-in for someone whose license has been suspended, revoked, or is otherwise ineligible to participate.
( 7 ) The State or territory of the Indian Tribe where the person produces or intends to produce hemp does not have a USDA-approved plan or has not submitted a plan to USDA for approval and is awaiting USDA's decision.
( 8 ) The State or territory of the Indian Tribe where the person produces or intends to produce hemp does not prohibit the production of hemp.
( b ) USDA shall provide written notification to applicants whether the application has been approved or denied. USDA shall provide written notification to applicants in a State or territory of an Indian Tribe that has submitted a plan to USDA and is awaiting USDA approval that their application is being returned. ( 1 ) If an application is approved, a license will be issued.
( 2 ) Licenses will be valid until December 31 of the year three after the year in which the license was issued.
( 3 ) Licenses may not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged, or otherwise disposed of, alienated or encumbered.
( 4 ) If a license application is denied, the notification from USDA will explain the reason for denial. Applicants may appeal the denial in accordance with subpart D of this part.
( c ) If the applicant is producing in more than one State or territory of an Indian Tribe, the applicant may have more than one license to grow hemp. If the applicant has operations in a location covered under a State or Tribal plan, that operation must be licensed under the State or Tribal plan, not the USDA plan.
§ 1710.101 Scope. ( a ) This part provides procedures for the collection by administrative offset of a federal employee's salary without his/her consent to satisfy certain debts owed to the federal government. This part applies to all federal employees who owe debts to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (Board) and to current employees of the Board who owe debts to other federal agencies. This part does not apply when the employee consents to recovery from his/her current pay account.
( b ) These procedures do not apply to debts or claims arising under: ( 1 ) The Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, 26 U.S.C. 1 *et seq.;*
( 2 ) The tariff laws of the United States; or
( 3 ) Any case where a collection of a debt is explicitly provided for or prohibited by another statute.
( c ) These procedures do not preclude the compromise, suspension, or termination of collection action where appropriate under the standards implementing the revised Federal Claims Collection Standards (FCCS), 31 U.S.C. 3711 *et seq.,* 31 CFR chapter IX, parts 900 through 904.
( d ) This part does not preclude an employee from requesting waiver of an overpayment under 5 U.S.C. 5584 or in any way questioning the amount or validity of the debt by submitting a subsequent claim to the Board. This part does not preclude an employee from requesting a waiver pursuant to other statutory provisions applicable to the particular debt being collected.
( e ) The Board is not limited to collection remedies contained in the revised FCCS. The FCCS is not intended to impair common law remedies.
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 30 Filed 12/20/2006 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 30 Filed 12/20/2006 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 30 Filed 12/20/2006 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 30 Filed 12/20/2006 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 30 Filed 12/20/2006 Page 5 of 5
#### § 110.101 Filing and service.

Filing and service of hearing documents shall be pursuant to § 110.89.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 USC, SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  quarterly  report of Beicang Iron & Steel,  Inc.,
f/k/a Alpha  Spacecom,  Inc.  (the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the nine month
period ended  September  30,  2006,  as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission  on November  20, 2006 (the  "Report"),  I, the  undersigned,  in the
capacity  and on the date  indicated  below,  certify,  pursuant  to 18  U.S.C./
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: November 20, 2006                s/Hou Beicang
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Hou Beicang, Chief Financial Officer/CFO
Case 2:06-cr-00205-WHA-CSC Document 17 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 1 of 1
228 So.2d 482

#### Paul H. JAMESON v. ST. TAMMANY PARISH POLICE JURY.

No. 50142.

Dec. 11, 1969.

In re: Paul H. Jameson applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of St. Tammany. 225 So.2d 720.

Writ refused. The judgment is correct.

McCALEB, J., is of the opinion that the application should be granted.
§ 958.52 Issuance of regulations. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in this part, the Secretary shall limit the shipment of onions by any one or more of the methods hereinafter set forth whenever he finds from the recommendations and information submitted by the committee, or from other available information, that such regulation would tend to effectuate the declared policy of the act. Such limitation may: ( 1 ) Regulate in any or all portions of the production area, the handling of particular grades, sizes, or qualities of any or all varieties of onions, or combinations thereof, during any period or periods;
( 2 ) Regulate the handling of particular grades, sizes, or qualities, of onions differently, for different varieties, for different portions of the production area, for different packs, or for any combination of the foregoing, during any period or periods;
( 3 ) Provide a method, through rules and regulations issued pursuant to this part, for fixing the size, capacity, weight, dimensions, or pack of the container, or containers, which may be used in the packaging or handling of onions, including appropriate container markings to identify the contents thereof;
( 4 ) Regulate the handling of onions by establishing, in terms of grades, sizes, or both, minimum standards of quality and maturity; or
( 5 ) Limit the shipment of the total quantity of onions by prohibiting the handling thereof during a specified period or periods. No regulation issued pursuant to this subparagraph shall be effective for more than 96 consecutive hours: *Provided,* That not less than 72 consecutive hours shall elapse between the termination of any such period of prohibition and the beginning of the next such period.
( 6 ) Regulate the handling of onions by establishing, in terms of total weight or total number of layers of containers of onions, the maximum load in railcars, taking into account types of containers and sizes of railcars used, potential resulting damage, and other relevant factors.
( b ) In the event the handling of onions is regulated pursuant to paragraph (a)(5) of this section, no handler shall handle any onions which were prepared for market or loaded during the effective period of such regulation. However, during any such period, no such regulation shall be deemed to limit the right of any person to sell or contract to sell onions for future shipment or delivery.
( c ) The Secretary may amend any regulation issued under this part whenever he finds that such amendment would tend to effectuate the declared policy of the act. The Secretary may also terminate or suspend any regulation or amendment thereof whenever he finds that such regulation or amendment obstructs or no longer tends to effectuate the declared policy of the act.
[22 FR 26, Jan. 3, 1957. Redesignated at 26 FR 12751, Dec. 30, 1961, as amended at 32 FR 11262, Aug. 3, 1967; 47 FR 8000, Feb. 24, 1982]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - [Report No. 2923]

                    A Petition for Reconsideration has been filed in the Commission's Rulemaking proceeding listed in this document and published pursuant to 47 CFR 1.429(e). The full text of this document is available for viewing and copying in Room CY-B402, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC, or may be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI) (1-800-378-3160). Oppositions to this petition must be filed by December 29, 2010.                     *See*                     Section 1.4(b)(1) of the Commission's rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition must be filed within 10 days after the time for filing oppositions has expired.                

*Subject:*                     In the Matter of Amendment of Part 101 of the Commission's Rules to Accommodate 30 Megahertz Channels in the 6525-6875 MHz Band (WT Docket No. 09-114).                

Amendment of Part 101 of the Commission's Rules to Provide for Conditional Authorization on Additional Channels in the 21.8-22.0 GHz and 23.0-23.2 GHz Band.

*Number of Petitions Filed:*                     1.                

Marlene H. Dortch,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-31354 Filed 12-13-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
#### In the Matter of Grantier Neville.

Order entered terminating suspension and reinstating petitioner as an attorney and counselor at law.
Case 1:06-cr-00170-WHA-CSC Document 215 Filed 10/13/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cr-00170-WHA-CSC Document 215-2 Filed 10/13/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### § 1003.9 Method of submission of petitions, documents, and other materials.

Absent exceptional circumstances, all submissions to the OHA, as provided in this part or otherwise, must be filed electronically in accordance with the instructions set forth on the OHA website, found at *https://www.energy.gov/oha/filing-information.* The OHA may grant permission to file via mail or facsimile. Any submissions made in hard copy will not be returned.
#### § 1044.12 What procedures can you invoke if you believe you have been discharged, demoted, or otherwise discriminated against as a reprisal for making a protected disclosure?

If you believe you have been discriminated against as a reprisal for making a protected disclosure, you may submit a complaint to the Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals, HG-1/L'Enfant Plaza Building, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585-1615, or you may send your complaint to the Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals, by facsimile to FAX number (202) 287-1415. In your complaint, you should give your reasons for believing that you have been discriminated against as a reprisal for making a protected disclosure, and include any information you think is relevant to your complaint. The Office of Hearings and Appeals will conduct an investigation of your complaint unless the Director determines your complaint is frivolous. The Director will notify you in writing if your complaint is found to be frivolous. If an investigation is conducted, the Director will submit a report of the investigation to you, to the employer named in your complaint, and to the Secretary of Energy, or the Secretary's designee. The Secretary, or the Secretary's designee, will take appropriate action, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 7239(k), to abate any discriminatory actions taken as reprisal for making a protected disclosure.

[66 FR 4642, Jan. 18, 2001, as amended at 71 FR 68736, Nov. 28, 2006]
The DJI S900 manual is too large for upload to regulations.gov. Therefore, if interested, please 

follow the link below to the assembly and operating manual for the sUAS. 

http://www.dji.com/product/spreading-wings-s900/download
#### § 1044.07 How can you find out if a particular person is authorized to receive a protected disclosure?

You must contact the Department of Energy Inspector General for help in determining whether a particular person is authorized to receive the classified or unclassified controlled nuclear information you wish to disclose. The Inspector General will contact the Office of Personnel Security as necessary to determine the security access authorization of the person to receive the protected disclosure.

[66 FR 4642, Jan. 18, 2001, as amended at 71 FR 68736, Nov. 28, 2006]
§ 1021.213 Rulemaking. ( a ) This section applies to regulations promulgated by DOE.
( b ) DOE shall begin its NEPA review of a proposed rule (if otherwise required by this part) while drafting the proposed regulation, and as soon as environmental effects can be meaningfully evaluated.
( c ) DOE shall include any relevant NEPA documents, public and agency comments (if any) on those documents, and DOE responses to those comments, as part of the administrative record (40 CFR 1505.1(c)).
( d ) If an EIS is required, DOE will normally publish the draft EIS at the time it publishes the proposed rule (40 CFR 1502.5(d)). DOE will normally combine any public hearings required for a proposed rule with the public hearings required on the draft EIS under § 1021.313 of this part. The draft EIS need not accompany notices of inquiry or advance notices of proposed rulemaking that DOE may use to gather information during early stages of regulation development. When engaged in rulemaking for the purpose of protecting the public health and safety, DOE may issue the final rule simultaneously with publication of the EPA Notice of Availability of the final EIS in accordance with 40 CFR 1506.10(b).
( e ) If an EA is required, DOE will normally complete the EA and issue any related FONSI prior to or simultaneously with issuance of the proposed rule; however, if the EA leads to preparation of an EIS, the provisions of paragraph (d) of this section shall apply.