alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) 2:06-mj-0069-DRB

) wo

ROSA E. RINCON )

DETENTION ORDER ON MOTION 

At the scheduled detention hearing on the Government’s Motion for Detention Hearing (Doc.

5), Assistant United States Attorney reported his notice of a detainer pending against Defendant

Rosa E. Rincon by the Department of Immigration and Customs Enforcement . Without concurring

in the United States’ description of Defendant Rincon as an illegal alien, defense counsel of record

agreed with the United Statesthat the filed detainer moots the scheduled detention hearing. For this

good cause, it is, therefore 

ORDERED that the United States’ Motion for Detention (Doc. 5) is DENIED AS MOOT

with respect to the reasons stated therein for detention, and the Motion is GRANTED to the extent

of its oral amendment requesting detention pursuant to the detainer pending against this

Defendant. 

It is further ORDERED that the defendant, Roaa E. Rincon, is committed to the

custody of the Attorney General or his designated representative for confinement in a

corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving

sentences or being held in custody pending appeal. The defendant shall be afforded a

reasonable opportunity for private consultation with defense counsel. On order of a court

of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, the person in charge

Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 23 Filed 07/21/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

of the corrections facility shall deliver the defendant to the United States Marshal for the

purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.

DONE this 21 day of July, 2006. st

/s/ Delores R. Boyd

DELORES R. BOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 23 Filed 07/21/2006 Page 2 of 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Crumble, Appellant.

Submitted December 3, 2007;

decided December 13, 2007

Reported below, 43 AD3d 953.

*997Motion for an extension of the time within which to apply for permission to appeal pursuant to CPL 460.20 granted and motion papers treated as a timely CPL 460.20 application.
<page>

EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Detection Technology (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jacques Tizabi, Principal Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial
Officer and Principle Accounting Officer of the Registrant, certify to the best
of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.



Dated:  August 14, 2008

                                               /s/ Jacques Tizabi
                                               --------------------------------
                                               Jacques Tizabi
                                               Principal Executive Officer and
                                               Acting Principal Financial
                                               Officer and Principal Accounting
                                               Officer
Case 1:06-cr-00186-DRB Document 1 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cr-00186-DRB Document 1 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 242 (Friday, December 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 79064]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31677]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>12409 and <greek-i>12410]


Mississippi Disaster <greek-i>MS-00042

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the State of Mississippi dated 12/07/2010.
    Incident: Severe storms and tornadoes.
    Incident Period: 11/29/2010 through 11/30/2010.
    Effective Date: 12/07/2010.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 02/07/2011.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 09/07/2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster 
loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally 
announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:
Primary Counties:
Monroe, Oktibbeha.
Contiguous Counties:
Mississippi: Chickasaw, Choctaw, Clay, Itawamba, Lee, Lowndes, Noxubee, 
Webster, Winston.
Alabama: Lamar, Marion.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere.................      4.500
  Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      2.250
  Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere.................      6.000
  Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      4.000
  Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere...      3.250
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      3.000
For Economic Injury:                                               4,000
  Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit      4.000
   Available Elsewhere.......................................
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      3.000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 12409 C 
and for economic injury is 12410 0.
    The States which received an EIDL Declaration <greek-i> are 
Mississippi, Alabama.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

    Dated: December 7, 2010.
Karen G. Mills,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2010-31677 Filed 12-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
# Subpart 2144.1 - General

**Parent topic:**PART 2144 - SUBCONTRACTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

## 2144.102 Policy.

For all FEGLI Program contracts, the Contracting Officer's advance approval will be required on subcontracts or modifications to subcontracts when the cost of that portion of the subcontract that is charged the FEGLI Program contract exceeds $550,000 and is at least 25 percent of the total cost of the subcontract.
#### Roberts *v.*Taylor.

*Appeal from Order granting Appeal.*

1. *When appeal lies.*— An appeal does not lie, at the instance of a register in chancery, from an order of the chancellor, granting an appeal to a married woman without security for costs (Code, § 3930), and directing the register to prepare and send up the transcript.

Appeal from the Chancery Court of Pike.

Heard before the Hon. H. Austill.

*550The transcript in this case shows that, on the 19th July, 1877, a petition was presented to the chancellor by Mrs. Harriet Taylor and Mrs. Sarah E. Thurman, alleging that they, with others, were defendants in a suit pending in said Chancery Court, at the suit of W. W. Tate, the object of which was the foreclosure of a mortgage ; that a decree was rendered in said suit, during the June term, 1877, in favor of the complainant in the bill ; that they, the petitioners, were married women, and were shown to be so by the record in said cause ; that the lands involved in the suit constituted a part of their statutory separate estates, they being children of the mortgagor; that they desired to appeal from said decree, but were unable to give security for the costs; that they made affidavit of that fact before the register, and that he refused to grant them an appeal; and they therefore prayed “ an order to said register, to compel him to grant said appeal, and to make out a transcript of the entire record and proceedings in said cause, so that the decree there rendered may be reviewed by the Supreme Court.” An answer to the petition was filed by the register, denying that the petitioners had any interest in the property, and alleging that the other defendants in the decree refused to give security for the costs of an appeal. Thereupon, the chancellor made an. order, which, after reciting the facts, thus proceeds : *“*It is therefore ordered that said petitioners, as such married women, are entitled to an appeal to the Supreme Court from the said decree ; and the register of this court is ordered to grant said appeal, and to send up to the Supreme Court a transcript of the record and proceedings in said cause, duly certified as the law requires. It is further ordered that this appeal is not granted in the name of the other respondents, who are adults, and are not married women, and have not given security for costs, or bond for appeal, but the same is granted to the petitioners, and to none others. But it is further ordered, that the other respondents may join in such appeal, by giving security for the costs, as the statute requires.” The register appeals from this order, and here assigns it as error ; and there is a joinder in error on the part of the appellees.

*W.*D. Eoberts, for appellant.

J. E. P. Elournoy, *contra.*

Per Curiam.

The order of the chancellor in this case, being simply a direction to the register to grant an appeal, and to prepare a transcript for this court, cannot be the subject of an appeal by the register. The appeal is dismissed,
Case 2:06-cr-00205-WHA-CSC Document 50 Filed 02/07/2007 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00205-WHA-CSC Document 50 Filed 02/07/2007 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00205-WHA-CSC Document 50 Filed 02/07/2007 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00205-WHA-CSC Document 50 Filed 02/07/2007 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00205-WHA-CSC Document 50 Filed 02/07/2007 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00205-WHA-CSC Document 50 Filed 02/07/2007 Page 6 of 6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

LINDA WILLIAMS SHELTON, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-719-WKW

)

ALL STATE FREIGHTWAYS, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

RULE 26(f) ORDER

The parties are hereby reminded of the obligation, imposed by Rule 26(f) of the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure, to confer and to develop a proposed discovery plan. The Rule 26(f)

report containing the discovery plan shall be filed as soon as practicable but not later than

September 28, 2006.

The longstanding practice in this district is that dispositive motions shall be filed no later

than 90 days prior to the pretrial date. If the parties seek to vary from that schedule, they should

present, in the plan, specific case related reasons for the requested variance.

This case will be set for trial before the undersigned judge during one of that judge's

regularly scheduled civil trial terms. The pretrial date is normally set within four to six weeks of

a scheduled trial term. The dates of each judge's civil trial terms are available on the court's

website located at http://almd.uscourts.gov in the civil case information section.

This court may or may not hold a scheduling conference before issuing a scheduling

order. If the court holds a scheduling conference, counsel may participate in the scheduling

conference by conference call.

The scheduling order entered by the court will follow the form of the Uniform Scheduling

Case 2:06-cv-00719-WKW-WC Document 5 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 1 of 2
Order adopted by the judges of this court. The Uniform Scheduling Order is also available on the

court's website.

The report of the parties should comply with Form 35 of the Appendix of Forms to the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

DONE this 7th day of September, 2006.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00719-WKW-WC Document 5 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

M IDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABA M A

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

September 21, 2006

NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY

From: Clerk’s Office

Case Style: USA vs. Eugene L. Cleckler

Case Number: 2:06cr202-001-WKW

 

Referenced Pleading: Document #35 - Motion to Continue trial filed 9/11/06

 Document #36 - Motion for Extension of Time filed 9/19/06

This Notice of Deficiency filed in the above referenced case to reflect that these documents

were filed without proper signatures. Please contact the Clerk’s office

regarding this matter. 

Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 39 Filed 09/21/2006 Page 1 of 1
Amendment No. 1 to Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 4.3 
 Amendment No. 1 to 
 Affiliated Computer
Services, Inc. 
 1997 Stock Incentive Plan 
 This Amendment No. 1 to the Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is
made to be effective as of the 28th day of October, 2004
(“Amendment”). 
 RECITALS: 
 WHEREAS, the Plan was originally adopted by the Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. (the “Company”) Board of Directors on August 5, 1997 and approved by the shareholders of the Company on
December 16, 1997; and 
 WHEREAS, Section 3 of the Plan provides a formula that permits the Company’s Board of
Directors to periodically increase the number of shares available for issuance pursuant to the Plan; and 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to
the new corporate governance standards of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) contained in Section 303A of the NYSE’s Listed Company Manual, any equity compensation plan that contains a formula for automatic increases in the
number of shares available is a “formula plan” and each increase in shares available under a “formula plan” will be considered a material revision requiring shareholder approval unless the plan has a term of not more than ten
years; and 
 WHEREAS, Section 303A.08 states that an amendment to limit a current plan to a term of no more than 10 years,
whether made prior to or after the effective date of the listing standard, would not be a “material revision” requiring shareholder approval; and 
 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has on this date approved an amendment to the Plan such that the Plan will terminate no later than December 1, 2007. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the Company hereby amends the Plan as follows: 
 Section 1. Amendment to Section 6 of the Plan. Section 6 is hereby replaced in its entirety with the following:

 “6. TERM OF PLAN. Subject to any applicable law and the provisions of Section 19 hereof, the Plan
shall terminate no later than December 1, 2007.” 
 Section 2. No Effect on Consistent Terms. All terms of
the Plan not inconsistent with this Amendment shall remain in place and in full force and effect and shall be unaffected by this Amendment. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Amendment as of the date first written above. 
  

			
	AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ WAYNE R. LEWIS

	Name:	 	Wayne R. Lewis
	Title:	 	Senior Vice President & Assistant Secretary
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF

ALABAMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs.

) CASE NUMBER: 2:06-CR-00202-WKW

EUGENE L. CLECKLER

DEFENDANT'S WAIVER OF SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

COMES NOW the Defendant, and hereby waives his right to speedy trial in the case.

As evidenced by his signature below, the Defendant hereby affirmatively, knowingly and

voluntarily waives his right to speedy trial as afforded him by Title 18, United States Code,

Section 3161.

Respectfully submitted, this the / ( day of September, 2006.

RONALD R. BRUNSON

ATTORNEY FOR EUGENE L. CLECKLER

2126 Morris Avenue

Birmingham, Alabama 35203

(205) 252-2100

Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 35-2 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 35-3 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 35-3 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 2 of 2
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 6697

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. TREMELL RASHAUD MCKINNEY, a/k/a Truth , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Wilmington

. James C. Dever III , District Judge. ( 7:10

- cr - 00063

- D

- 1 )

Submitted : August 25, 2020 Decided: August 28, 2020

Before KING and AGEE , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Tremell Rashaud McKinney, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May

- Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North C arolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Tremell Rashaud McKinney appeals the district court’s orde r denying relief on his motion seeking a sentence reduction pursuant to the First Step Act of 20 18, Pub. L. No. 115

- 391, § 404, 132 Stat. 5194, 5222 . We have reviewed the record and find that the court did not abuse its discretion in declining to reduce McKinney’s sentence . Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Unite d States v. McKinney , No. 7:10

- cr 00063

- D

- 1 (E.D.N.C

. May 7, 2020)

. We deny McKinney’s motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this cou rt and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2413.505 Purchase order and related forms.

Parent topic: Subpart 2413.5 - Purchase Orders
#### BANDLER, Appellant, v. HILL et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 26, 1914.)

Action by David Bandler against John R. Hill and another.

No opinion. Judgment (84 Misc. Rep. 359, 146 N. Y. Supp. 98) affirmed, with costs.
Case 2:06-cr-00203-MHT-CSC Document 18 Filed 10/23/2006 Page 1 of 1
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 2.404 Hearings on applications for operating licenses pursuant to appendix N of 10 CFR part 50.

If a request for a hearing and/or petition for leave to intervene is filed within the time prescribed in the notice of proposed action on an application for an operating license pursuant to appendix N of part 50 of this chapter with respect to a specific reactor(s) at a specific site, and the Commission, the Chief Administrative Judge, or a presiding officer has issued a notice of hearing or other appropriate order, then the Commission, the Chief Administrative Judge, or the presiding officer may order separate hearings on particular phases of the proceeding and/or consolidate for hearing two or more proceedings in the manner described in § 2.402.
#### § 1016.6 Specific waivers.

DOE may, upon application of any interested party, grant such waivers from the requirements of this part as it determines are authorized by law and will not constitute an undue risk to the common defense and security.
Form 10-K


BTHC X, Inc.


File No. 000-52237


Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of BTHC X, Inc. (the Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report”), I, George Syllantavos, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date:   March 30, 2010


By:  /s/ George SyllantavosGeorge SyllantavosChief Executive andChief Financial Officer






A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to BTHC X, Inc. and will be retained by BTHC X, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v ) CR. NO. 2:06cr198-WKW

)

RONALD MCQUEEN )

ORDER

Upon consideration of the motion to continue the pretrial conference (doc. # 24)

presently set for September 25, 2006, it is

ORDERED that the motion be and is hereby DENIED.

Done this 22 day of September, 2006. nd

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00198-WKW-CSC Document 25 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 1 of 1
§ 986.54 Duties. The duties of the Council shall be as follows: ( a ) To act as intermediary between the Secretary and any handler or grower;
( b ) To keep minute books and records which will clearly reflect all of its acts and transactions, and such minute books and records shall at any time be subject to the examination of the Secretary;
( c ) To furnish to the Secretary a complete report of all meetings and such other available information as he or she may request;
( d ) To appoint such employees as it may deem necessary and to determine the salaries, define the duties, and fix the bonds of such employees;
( e ) To cause the books of the Council to be audited by one or more certified public accountants at least once for each fiscal year and at such other times as the Council deems necessary or as the Secretary may request, and to file with the Secretary three copies of all audit reports made;
( f ) To investigate the growing, shipping and marketing conditions with respect to pecans and to assemble data in connection therewith;
( g ) To investigate compliance with the provisions of this part; and,
( h ) To recommend by-laws, rules and regulations for the purpose of administering this part.