alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 132 (Wednesday, July 10, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 41290]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-16442]

[[Page 41290]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2012-1334; Airspace Docket No. 12-ASO-18]

Establishment of Class E Airspace; Sanibel, FL

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule: correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action corrects the geographic coordinates in the 
airspace description of a final rule, published in the Federal Register 
on June 10, 2013, establishing controlled airspace at Sanibel Island 
Heliport, Sanibel, FL.

DATES: Effective date: 0901 UTC. August 22, 2013. The Director of the 
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under 
title 1, Code of Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to the annual 
revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and publication of conforming amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Fornito, Operations Support 
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P. O. 
Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404) 305-6364.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

History

    On June 10, 2013, the FAA published a final rule, in the Federal 
Register establishing Class E airspace at Sanibel Island Heliport, 
Sanibel, FL. (78 FR 34557). After publication, the FAA found 
typographical errors in the airspace designation and regulatory text 
for both the heliport and point in space coordinates. This action makes 
the corrections and is rewritten for clarity.
    The Class E airspace designations are published in Paragraphs 6005 
of FAA order 7400.9V, dated August 8, 2012, and effective September 15, 
2012, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E 
airspace designations listed in this document will be published 
subsequently in the Order.

Correction to Final Rule

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, on page 
34558, beginning at line 50, the description of the Class E airspace 
for Sanibel Island Heliport, Sanibel, FL, as published in the Federal 
Register of June 10, 2013 (78 FR 34557), FR Doc. 2013-13107, is 
corrected to read:
* * * * *

ASO FL E5 Sanibel, FL [Corrected]

Sanibel Island Heliport, FL
(Lat. 26[deg]27'46'' N., long. 82[deg]09'18'' W.) Point in Space 
Coordinates
(Lat. 26[deg]27'52'' N., long. 82[deg]08'35'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface 
within a 6-mile radius of the point in space coordinates (lat. 
26[deg]27'52'' N., long. 82[deg]08'35'' W) serving Sanibel Island 
Heliport.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on June 28, 2013.
Barry A. Knight,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic 
Organization.
[FR Doc. 2013-16442 Filed 7-9-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
Exhibit 35.4



|     |  |                                                                                                                        
|---- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | Corporate Trust Services 
MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045 
Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410
715 2380
|    
|    
|    
|    

Citibank, National Association

388 Greenwich Street

14th Floor

New York, New York 10013



|Re: | Annual Statement of Compliance for Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2012-6 Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2012-6
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Per the Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing dated as of January 1, 2014 (the Agreement), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Master Servicer (Wells Fargo), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the Reporting Period):

(a)    A review of Wells Fargos activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has
been made under such officers supervision; and

(b)    To the best of such officers knowledge, based on
such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

March 1,
2017



|              
|--------------
|LOGO          
|Kristen Cronin
|Vice President



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
1402.170 Acronyms.

A&E Architect & Engineering

ACMIS Acquisition Career Management Information System

AMP Acquisition Manager's Partnership

AMR Acquisition Management Review

AS/PMB Assistant Secretary - Policy, Management and Budget

BPA Blanket Purchase Agreement

BPC Bureau Procurement Chief

CA Competition Advocate

CAAC Civilian Agency Acquisition Council

CAS Cost Accounting Standards

CASB Cost Accounting Standards Board

CBCA Civilian Board of Contract Appeals

CCO Chief of the Contracting Office

CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act

CFR Code of Federal Regulations

CIO Chief Information Officer

CO Contracting Officer

COA Certificate of Appointment

COI Conflicts of Interest

COR Contracting Officer's Representative

COTR Contracting Officer's Technical Representative

DISP Defense Industrial Security Program

DM Departmental Manual

DOI Department of the Interior

DOL Department of Labor

EC Electronic Commerce
FAR Federal Acquisition Regulation

FBMS Financial Business Management System

FPDS - NG Federal Procurement Data System - Next Generation

GAO Government Accountability Office

GIDEP Government-Industry Data Exchange Program

GPE Government Point of Entry

GPO Government Printing Office

GSA General Services Administration

GSBCA General Services Board of Contract Appeals

HCA Head of the Contracting Activity

IT Information Technology

IPMD Interior Property Management Directives

MBDA Minority Business Development Agency

OCIO Office of Chief Information Officer

OIG/IG Office of Inspector General/Inspector General

OFPP Office of Federal Procurement Policy

OHA Office of Hearings and Appeals

OMB Office of Management and Budget

OS Office of the Secretary

OSDBU Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization

PAM Office of Acquisition and Property Management

PMO Property Management Officer

PNM Procurement Negotiation Memorandum

SAT Simplified Acquisition Threshold

SBA Small Business Administration

SBS Small Business Specialist

SOL Office of the Solicitor

TFM Treasury Financial Manual
U.S.C. United States Code

VECP Value Engineering Change Proposal

Parent topic: Subpart 1402.1 - Definitions
gss_ex10-10.htm


    
      
         

        U.S.
smoothie market more than doubles

         

        FoodProcessing.com

         

        02/22/2007

         

         

        With
on-the-go dining and snacking moving to the American meal forefront, the U.S.
smoothie market has been flooded with consumers looking for a quick portable
meal alternative.

         

        According
to market research firm Mintel, smoothie makers raked in more than $2 billion
from made-to-order and packaged smoothies in 2006, up more than 80 percent in
the last five years.

         

        The
market for health-conscious products continues to grow rapidly. Smoothies have
quickly become part of the American landscape, with more than 4,000 retail
locations reported in the U.S. last year. According to Mintel research, more
than half of respondents in the 18 to 34 year-old range said that they had a
smoothie in the last month.

         

        “Consumers
are attracted to smoothies because they are seen as a healthier option to most
sweets and on-the-go meals,” said David Lockwood, director of Mintel Reports.
“Now that the smoothie market is a proven success, companies are being pushed to
the next level — extreme differentiation. Similar to the coffee market,
smoothie companies need to continue developing innovative flavors and additives
to keep consumers engaged in the market, but also should consider expanding the
menu as some chains have done with sandwiches or coffee.”

         

        The
smoothie industry’s new offerings are using emerging flavors, such as açaí and
green tea, and hybrids of smoothies with other drink types. New nutrient
“boosts” feed consumer need for evolving offerings as well. Smoothie companies
have also remained on track with current food trends, utilizing “all-natural,”
low-calorie and other key buzz properties to build sales.

         

        “The
flavor combinations and possibilities are endless with the smoothie market,”
said Lockwood. “With functional foods and beverages having a strong marketplace
advantage, smoothies are in position to dominate the healthy beverages category.
Smoothies are seen as a pleasant health treat, and this will continue to take
the category far.”

         

        In
contrast with yogurt drinks, 39 percent of Mintel respondents agreed or strongly
agreed that “smoothies are healthier than drinks made with yogurt.” Similarly,
more than half of consumers agreed or strongly agreed that “smoothies taste
better than yogurt drinks,” with yogurts getting only 15 percent.
Subpart 3003.1—Safeguards

Parent topic: PART 3003—IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF

INTEREST

3003.101 Standards of conduct.

3003.101-3 Agency regulations.

The United States Office of Government Ethics has promulgated regulations applicable to the entire

Executive Branch that address the conduct matters referenced in (FAR) 48 CFR 3.101–3. See 5 CFR

vol. 3, ch. XVI, subch. B. The Department of Homeland Security has also issued a supplemental

ethics regulation at 5 CFR part 4601 and Management Directive 0480.1, Ethics/Standards of

Conduct.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1045

#### Editorial Notes:Nomenclature changes to part 1045 appear at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023, and 88 FR 82238, Nov. 24, 2023.

§ 1045.40 Is there an official in each agency with access to RD, FRD, or TFNI who manages the agency's RD, FRD, or TFNI program to ensure the requirements in this part are met?

Editorial Notes:

Nomenclature changes to part 1045 appear at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023, and 88 FR 82238, Nov. 24, 2023.

Yes. The head of each agency with access to RD, FRD, or TFNI:

(a) Must appoint at least one Federal official to serve as an RDMO who ensures the proper implementation of this part within his or her agency and serves as the primary point of contact for coordination with the Director, Office of Classification, for classification and declassification issues involving RD, FRD, and TFNI. Within DoD, a minimum of at least one RDMO must be appointed in each military department.

(b) May appoint or authorize the RDMO to appoint one or more Associate RDMOs if there is more than one organization that has access to RD, FRD, or TFNI. In such cases, the RDMO is the lead official and the primary point of contact with the Director, Office of Classification.

(c) Must ensure contact information for each RDMO and ARDMO is sent to the Director, Office of Classification, within 30 days of the appointment.
160 So.2d 229

#### Jim GARRISON, District Attorney, v. Leo MENENDEZ and Harry C. Mendoza.

No. 47110.

Feb. 14, 1964.

In re: Leo Menendez and Harry C. Mendoza applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 158 So.2d 856.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal there appears no error of law in its judgment.
#### In the Matter of Foreclosure of Tax Liens. County of Rockland, Respondent; Piermont Commercial Corp, Appel*792lant.

[816 NYS2d 506]

In a proceeding pursuant to Real Property Tax Law article 11 to foreclose certain tax liens, Piermont Commercial Corp. appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Nelson, J.), entered January 11, 2005, which, upon an order of the same court dated December 17, 2004, granting the petitioner’s motion, inter alia, to vacate an earlier judgment of the same court (Meehan, J.), dated August 24, 1999, which, upon the default of Piermont Commercial Corp., among other things, awarded the possession of certain real property to the petitioner, inter alia, vacated the judgment dated August 24, 1999, permitted the petitioner to withdraw the subject real property from the foreclosure proceeding, and directed the execution of a cancellation deed reinstating title to the subject real property to Piermont Commercial Corp.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petitioner’s motion is denied, the order dated December 17, 2004 is vacated, and the judgment dated August 24, 1999 is reinstated.

As the appellant correctly contends, the petitioner’s motion to vacate, brought nearly five years after the deed was conveyed to the petitioner and recorded, was time-barred by the two-year statute of limitations contained in RPTL 1137 *(see CDS Recoveries v Davis,*277 AD2d 567 [2000]; *see also Matter of ISCA Enters. v City of New York,*77 NY2d 688 [1991]; *Weber v Suffolk County Div. of Real Estate,*1 AD3d 590 [2003]). Therefore, the Supreme Court erred in granting the motion *(see McCoy v Feinman,*99 NY2d 295, 300 [2002]; *Matter of Magat v County of Rockland,*265 AD2d 483 [1999]).

In light of our determination, the parties’ remaining contentions need not be reached. Florio, J.P., Miller, Adams and Skelos, JJ., concur.
# Subpart 1346.4 - Government Contract Quality Assurance

**Parent topic:**PART 1346 - QUALITY ASSURANCE

## 1346.401 General.

Agency procedures for documenting government inspection are set forth under Subpart 1346.6.
Special Report of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Aff airs

United States Senate • Washington, D.C. • 2006

Hurricane Katrina

A Nation Still Unprepared

Hurricane Katrina: A Nation Still Unprepared

This book summarizes the results of a comprehensive and bipartisan investigation of the many failures at all levels of government in preparing for and 

responding to the Hurricane Katrina disaster of late summer 2005.

The U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

conducted 22 hearings over eight months, heard testimony or collected interviews from more than 400 people, and examined more than 838,000 pages 

of documents to compile its Report.

It is more than a study of the Katrina catastrophe. It is a guidebook for 

improving the full spectrum of our preparedness, mitigation, response, and 

recovery mechanisms to protect Americans from future disasters, whether 

natural or man-made.

“We knew Katrina was coming. How much worse would 

the nightmare have been if the disaster had been unannounced – an earthquake in San Francisco, a burst levee 

near St. Louis or Sacramento, a biological weapon smuggled 

into Boston Harbor, or a chemical-weapon terror attack in 

Chicago?

“Hurricane Katrina found us – still – a nation unprepared 

for catastrophe.

“The United States Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs has prepared this bipartisan 

report to acknowledge what was done well, to identify what 

was done poorly or not at all, and to recommend changes 

in our national system for emergency response that will 

put local, state, federal, and private responders in a better 

position to provide prompt and effective relief when disaster 

strikes again.”

– From the Note to Readers by Senator Susan M. Collins, Chairman,

and Senator Joseph I. Lieberman, Ranking Member, of the

U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

 A Nation Still Unprepared

Hurricane Katrina

U.S. Senate

S. Rept. 109-322

2006 9 780160 767494

90000

ISBN 0-16-076749-0
EXHIBIT
10.1

      


      Mascot
Ventures Inc.

      1802
North Carson Street, Suite 108

      Carson
City, Nevada 89701

      


      November
19, 2009

      


      


      Wendy
Wildmen

      President

      Mascot
Ventures Inc.

      1802
North Carson Street, Suite 108

      Carson
City, Nevada 89701

      


      This letter agreement, dated November
19, 2009, memorializes the terms and conditions of that certain agreement of
compensation by and between Wendy Wildmen (“Wildmen”) and Mascot Ventures Inc.,
a Nevada corporation (the “Company”).

      


      1.  Compensation.  The
Company agrees to pay Wildmen, for a term of two (2) years, $1,000 per month, on
the last day of each month, as consideration for Wildmen serving and performing
his duties as a non-employee President of the Company.  Wildmen shall
have such executive responsibilities and duties as are assigned by the Board of
Directors of the Company and are consistent with the position of
President.  Wildmen shall assign his right to such compensation of
$1,000 per month to the Company, until such time as the Company closes on an
equity or debt financing of not less than $100,000.

      


      2.  Acknowledgement.  The Company and Wildmen acknowledge that
between September 25, 2007 and November 18, 2009, the Company and Wildmen had
and performed on an oral agreement pursuant to which (i) the Company was
obligated to pay Mr. Wildmen $1,000 per month as consideration for Wildmen
serving and performing his duties as a non-employee President of the Company,
and (ii) Mr. Wildmen assigned the right to receive all such compensation payable
between September 25, 2007 and November 18, 2009, back to the
Company.

      


      3.  Assignment.  This
letter agreement may not be assigned unless the Company and Wildmen consent in
writing to such assignment.

      


      Very truly yours,

      


      MASCOT VENTURES, INC.

      


      


      


      By:  ___________________________________

      Name:  Clive
Hope

      Title:  Secretary

      


      Agreed
and Accepted this 19th day of
November:

      


      


      


      By:  ___________________________________

              Name:  Wendy
Wildmen (individually)
<PAGE>   1
PART II, ITEM 6, EXHIBIT 11.



                               EGAN SYSTEMS, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  Three Months Ended

                                                             1997                     1996
                                                             ----                     ----


<S>                                                    <C>                        <C>
Net income applicable to common stock                  $       22,342             $       47,180
                                                       ==============             ==============


Outstanding shares - common stock at January 1,            10,185,000                 10,185,000


Dilutive effect of stock options and warrants               8,449,443                     -


Weighted average shares issued during period                  564,000                     -     
                                                       --------------             --------------


Weighted average common shares outstanding -
 primary and fully diluted - March 31,                     19,198,443                 10,185,000
                                                       ==============             ==============


Net income per common share -
 primary and fully diluted - March 31,                 $         0.00             $         0.01
                                                       ==============             ==============
</TABLE>





                                       10
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 82 (Friday, April 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25155-25156]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10233]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

State Energy Advisory Board (STEAB)

AGENCY: Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open teleconference.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a teleconference call of the State 
Energy Advisory Board (STEAB). The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. 
L. 92-463; 86 Stat. 770) requires that public notice of these meetings 
be announced in the Federal Register.

[[Page 25156]]

DATES: Thursday, May 17, 2012, from 3:30 p.m.-4 p.m. (EST). To receive 
the call-in number and passcode, please contact the Board's Designated 
Federal Officer (DFO) at the address or phone number listed below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gil Sperling, STEAB Designated Federal 
Officer, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and 
Renewable Energy, 1000 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20585. 
Phone number is (202) 287-1644.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Purpose of the Board: To make recommendations to the Assistant 
Secretary for the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy 
regarding goals and objectives, programmatic and administrative 
policies, and to otherwise carry out the Board's responsibilities as 
designated in the State Energy Efficiency Programs Improvement Act of 
1990 (Pub. L. 101-440).
    Tentative Agenda: Plan for the upcoming June 26-28, 2012, live 
Board meeting; update the Board on the activities of the STEAB's Task 
Forces; review of EECBG recommendations to DOE; and provide an update 
to the Board on routine business matters and other topics of interest.
    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. Written 
statements may be filed with the Board either before or after the 
meeting. Members of the public who wish to make oral statements 
pertaining to agenda items should contact Gil Sperling at the address 
or telephone number listed above. Requests to make oral comments must 
be received five days prior to the meeting; reasonable provision will 
be made to include requested topic(s) on the agenda. The Chair of the 
Board is empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will 
facilitate the orderly conduct of business.
    Minutes: The minutes of the meeting will be available for public 
review and copying within 60 days on the STEAB Web site, www.steab.org.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on April 23, 2012.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Acting Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-10233 Filed 4-26-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
§ 1040.61 Purpose and application. ( a ) The purpose of this subpart is to implement sec. 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which is designed to eliminate discrimination on the basis of handicap in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.
( b ) This subpart applies to each recipient or subrecipient of Federal financial assistance from DOE and to each program or activity that receives assistance.
[45 FR 40515, June 13, 1980, as amended at 68 FR 51347, Aug. 26, 2003]
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear at 70 FR 30897, May 31, 2005; 77 FR 39904, July 6, 2012; 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

#### § 10.4 Policy.

It is the policy of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to carry out its responsibility for the security of the nuclear energy program in a manner consistent with traditional American concepts of justice. To this end, the Commission has established criteria for determining eligibility for access authorization and/or employment clearance and will afford those individuals described in § 10.2 the opportunity for administrative review of questions concerning their eligibility for access authorization and/or employment clearance.