alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
690000m.

BATHYMETRIC MAP

ATLANTIC OCEAN
LANIER

79000m.E,

ff i 970
va

TGOOOIRN.

‘3660000m.N

a

60000m.E,

Bathymetry compiled by the National Ocean Service (NOS) from Bathymetric Data other than
NOS hydrographic surveys. This is a facsimile reproduction of the bathymetric manuscript
and does not necessarily represent its final published form. This information is not intended
for navigational purposes.

Bathymetric Contour Interval: 50 meters to maximum depth.

Universal Transverse Mercator Grid. Zone 18; 10,000 meter ticks (--) are shown inside the

neatline.
Protraction Diagram data shown in subdued (screened) black was compiled by the Minerals

Management Service (MMS).
THIS MAP IS NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT for Federal leasing purposes; for such purposes
use the MMS Outer Continental Shelf Official Protraction Diagrams.

Heavy line(s) indicate limits of these protraction diagrams.

EVALUATION OF BATHYMETRIC DATA

Bathymetry compiled by the National Ocean Service from
Random Tracklines and Bathymetric Surveys dated 1959 to 1974,
The Bathymetric Data ranges in scale from 1:500,000 to
1:1,000,000 with 2 minimum line spacing of 5.0 and 2 maximum
line spacing of 11.0 nautical miles.

Date corrected for sound velocity

according to Matthews’ Tables, 1939.

OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF RESOURCE MANAGEMENT MAP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE

1984

Produced at Washington, D.C.
for

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE

TRANSVERSE MERCATOR PROJECTION
Scale 1:250,000

5 io} 5 10 15 20 Statute Miles

5 ° 5 10 15 20. 25 30 Kilometers

J} 5 10 15 Nautical Miles
7

BATHYMETRIC DATA INDEX

33°

Bathymetric data from sources other than
NOS hydrographic surveys.

33°

74°

728

76°

770000.

E.

LANIER
NOS NI 18-9 (OCS)

INDEX TO ADJOINING SHEETS

RUSSELL
NIie-S

HATTERAS.
RIDGE
ND 18-6

MARMER
NI 1e8

LANIER
Nt 1g-9

WITTMaN
NEqe-lD

Tigger
NI 1e12

-

4 NO LNIe 40 3963 NOUISOE

z@
¢
fs}
is}

]

°
a

eee@'ese

S20 BRBWY
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*November 15, 2007*

[Cite as *11/1512007 Case Announcements,*2007-Ohio-6058.]

MEDIATION REFERRALS

The following case has been referred to mediation pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XPV(6):

2007-1694.

#### State ex rel. Toledo Blade Co. v. Seneca Cty. Bd. of Commrs.

In Mandamus.
#### Perkins *v.*The State.

November 11, 1913.

Indictment for murder. Before Judge Rawlings. Jenkins superior court. June 11, 1913.

*Frank G. Babb*and *G. 0. Dekle,*for plaintiff in error.

*T. 8. Felder, attorney-general,*and *B. Lee Moore, solicitor-general,*contra.

Fish, C. J.

No complaint was made that any error was committed on the trial. There was evidence sufficient to authorize the verdict. The court did not abuse its discretion in refusing a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Entity
    
    JurisdictionCoffeyville Refining & Marketing Holdings, Inc.
    
    DelawareCoffeyville Refining & Marketing, Inc.
    
    DelawareCoffeyville Nitrogen Fertilizers, Inc.
    
    DelawareCoffeyville Crude Transportation, Inc.
    
    DelawareCoffeyville Terminal, Inc.
    
    DelawareCoffeyville Pipeline, Inc.
    
    DelawareCL JV Holdings, LLC
    
    DelawareCoffeyville Resources, LLC
    
    DelawareCoffeyville Resources Refining & Marketing, LLC
    
    DelawareCoffeyville Resources Crude Transportation, LLC
    
    DelawareCoffeyville Resources Terminal, LLC
    
    DelawareCoffeyville Resources Pipeline, LLC
    
    DelawareCVR Special GP, LLC
    
    DelawareCVR Partners, LP
    
    DelawareCoffeyville Resources Nitrogen Fertilizers, LLC
    
    DelawareCoffeyville Finance Inc.
    
    Delaware
Subpart 442.1 - Interagency Contract

Administration and Audit Services

Parent topic: PART 442 - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION

442.102 Procedures.

(a) The Office of Inspector General (OIG), Audit Division, has established a cross-servicing

arrangement with the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) to provide contract audit services

required by the FAR.

(b) All contract audit services required by contracting officers, except those which can be

accomplished in-house, shall be coordinated through the cognizant OIG Regional Inspector General -

Auditing (RIG-A). Cognizance is determined on the basis of the contractor's location. There is no

charge for DCAA audit services coordinated through OIG.

(c) In order to ensure compliance with this requirement and to evaluate the results of audits,

contracting officers shall forward to the RIG-A copies of all price negotiation memoranda prepared

for contracts and contract modifications in excess of $500,000.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

** **

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MAI Systems Corporation (the Company) forthe period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James D. Dolan, Chief Financialand Operating Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1.               TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.               Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: September 23,  2005 | By:    | /s/ James W. Dolan                     |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                           |   | James  W. Dolan                        |
|                           |   | Chief  Financial and Operating Officer |

 

----
252.223-7001 Hazard Warning Labels.       As prescribed in                 223.303             , use the following clause:          HAZARD WARNING LABELS (DEC 1991)          (a)  “Hazardous material,” as used in this clause, is defined in the Hazardous Material Identification and Material Safety Data clause of this contract.          (b)  The Contractor shall label the item package (unit container) of any hazardous material to be delivered under this contract in accordance with the Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200 et seq).  The Standard requires that the hazard warning label conform to the requirements of the standard unless the material is otherwise subject to the labelling requirements of one of the following statutes:          (1)  Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act;          (2)  Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act;          (3)  Consumer Product Safety Act;          (4)  Federal Hazardous Substances Act; or          (5)  Federal Alcohol Administration Act.          (c)  The Offeror shall list which hazardous material listed in the Hazardous Material Identification and Material Safety Data clause of this contract will be labelled in accordance with one of the Acts in paragraphs (b)(1) through (5) of this clause instead of the Hazard Communication Standard.  Any hazardous material not listed will be interpreted to mean that a label is required in accordance with the Hazard Communication Standard.                    MATERIAL (If None, Insert “None.”)                                                                  ACT          (d)  The apparently successful Offeror agrees to submit, before award, a copy of the hazard warning label for all hazardous materials not listed in paragraph (c) of this clause.  The Offeror shall submit the label with the Material Safety Data Sheet being furnished under the Hazardous Material Identification and Material Safety Data clause of this contract.          (e)  The Contractor shall also comply with MIL-STD-129, Marking for Shipment and Storage (including revisions adopted during the term of this contract).          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 252.223 RESERVED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) Criminal Case No. 2:06-cr-200-CSC

)

ROSA E. RINCON )

MOTION TO CONTINUE

COMES NOW Defendant, by and through counsel, and prays that the Court will continue

the hearing set in this case for November 28, 2006, and as grounds would show as follows:

1. Counsel for Defendant Rincon is scheduled to be in trial in Gadsden, Alabama, in the

case of Lacy v. Heard, 4:05-cv-2154, presently pending in the U.S. District Court for the

Northern District of Alabama, which trial is set to begin on November 28th.

2. Counsel anticipates that the trial will consume the remainder of that week.

3. Plaintiff notes that the government has also filed a motion to continue, with which motion

Defendant Rincon hereby joins.

WHEREFORE, the premises considered, Defendant Rincon prays that the Court will

continue the subject hearing until the week of December 4, 2006.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, this __21st__ day of November, 2006.

/s/ JAY LEWIS

Jay Lewis

Law Offices of Jay Lewis, L.L.C.

P.O. Box 5059

Montgomery, Alabama 36103

(334) 263-7733 (Voice)

(334) 832-4390 (Fax)

J-Lewis@JayLewisLaw.com

ASB-2014-E66J

Attorney for Defendant

Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 74 Filed 11/21/2006 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the _21st_ day of November, 2006, I electronically filed the

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of

such filing to the following parties or counsel:

Terry Moorer

Christopher Snyder

Office of the United States Attorney

Matthew Patrick Teague

Attorney for Silva

/s/ JAY LEWIS

Jay Lewis

Law Offices of Jay Lewis, L.L.C.

P.O. Box 5059

Montgomery, Alabama 36103

(334) 263-7733 (Voice)

(334) 832-4390 (Fax)

J-Lewis@JayLewisLaw.com

ASB-2014-E66J

Attorney for Defendant

Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 74 Filed 11/21/2006 Page 2 of 2
Sanitized – Attachment 012 Page 1 of 6Sanitized – Attachment 012 Page 2 of 6Sanitized – Attachment 012 Page 3 of 6Sanitized – Attachment 012 Page 4 of 6Sanitized – Attachment 012 Page 5 of 6Sanitized – Attachment 012 Page 6 of 6
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 107 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 107

 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on International 
              Relations in the One Hundred Ninth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 16, 2005

Mr. Hyde submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on International 
              Relations in the One Hundred Ninth Congress.

    Resolved, 

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on International Relations 
(hereafter in this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), 
including the expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out 
of the applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for 
committee salaries and expenses, not more than $18,869,785 for the One 
Hundred Ninth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $9,092,015 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2005, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2006; and
            (2) not more than $9,777,770 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2006, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2007.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
# Subpart 3011.6 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**PART 3011—DESCRIBING AGENCY NEEDS
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of KINGDOM KONCRETE, INC. on Form 10-K/A for the   year ended December 31, December
31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities
and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
of the Company.




/s/ EDWARD STEVENS

Edward Stevens
CEO

Dated:
April 28, 2014



/s/ EDWARD STEVENS

Edward Stevens

CFO

Dated:
 April 28, 2014




This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent
required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended.
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 2.1407 Appeal and Commission review of initial decision. ( a ) ( 1 ) Within 25 days after service of a written initial decision, a party may file a written appeal seeking the Commission's review on the grounds specified in paragraph (b) of this section. Unless otherwise authorized by law, a party must file an appeal with the Commission before seeking judicial review.
( 2 ) An appeal under this section may not be longer than twenty (20) pages and must contain the following: ( i ) A concise statement of the specific rulings and decisions that are being appealed;
( ii ) A concise statement (including record citations) where the matters of fact or law raised in the appeal were previously raised before the presiding officer and, if they were not, why they could not have been raised;
( iii ) A concise statement why, in the appellant's view, the decision or action is erroneous; and
( iv ) A concise statement why the Commission should review the decision or action, with particular reference to the grounds specified in paragraph (b) of this section.
( 3 ) Any other party to the proceeding may, within 25 days after service of the appeal, file an answer supporting or opposing the appeal. The answer may not be longer than 20 pages and should concisely address the matters specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section. The appellant does not have a right to reply. Unless it directs additional filings or oral arguments, the Commission will decide the appeal on the basis of the filings permitted by this paragraph.
( b ) In considering the appeal, the Commission will give due weight to the existence of a substantial question with respect to the following considerations: ( 1 ) A finding of material fact is clearly erroneous or in conflict with a finding as to the same fact in a different proceeding;
( 2 ) A necessary legal conclusion is without governing precedent or is a departure from, or contrary to, established law;
( 3 ) A substantial and important question of law, policy or discretion has been raised by the appeal;
( 4 ) The conduct of the proceeding involved a prejudicial procedural error; or
( 5 ) Any other consideration which the Commission may deem to be in the public interest.
( c ) Once a decision becomes final agency action, the Secretary shall transmit the decision to the NRC staff for action in accordance with the decision.
[69 FR 2271, Jan. 14, 2004, as amended at 77 FR 46599, Aug. 3, 2012]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 138 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 138

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Intelligence in 
                    the One Hundred Ninth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 2005

Mr. Hoekstra submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                 the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Intelligence in 
                    the One Hundred Ninth Congress.

    Resolved, 

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on Intelligence (hereafter in 
this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including the 
expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the 
applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for committee 
salaries and expenses, not more than $9,875,428.82 for the One Hundred 
Ninth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $4,438,939.16 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2005, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2006; and
            (2) not more than $5,436,489.66 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2006, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2007.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3100 

To suspend temporarily the duty on fabric covered aerodynamic seals. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. BROWNBACK introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on fabric covered 

aerodynamic seals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FABRIC COVERED AERODYNAMIC SEALS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.59.11 Fabric covered aerodynamic seals (provided for in subheading 5911.90.00) ....... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 3100 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
               RULE 13a-14(b)


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gallery of History, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Todd Axelrod, Chief Executive Office of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

1.	 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Todd Axelrod
----------------
Todd Axelrod
Chief Executive Officer

May 15, 2007
1915.106-70 Key personnel and facilities.

Whenever contractor selection has been substantially predicated on the contractor's possession of

special capabilities (i.e., personnel and/or facilities) the contracting officer shall include the clause at

1952.215-70 in the awarded contract.

Parent topic: Subpart 1915.1 - General Requirements for Negotiation
#### Edward A. Gormel, Respondent, v. Pfuntner Sales & Service, Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: No adequate special circumstances have been set forth in the moving papers to authorize pretrial examinations of nonparty witnesses to be preserved for the trial. *(McElligott*v. *Harper Vending,*24 A D 2d 850.) (Appeal from order of Livingston Special Term granting plaintiff’s motion to take depositions before trial.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Henry, Del Vecchio and Marsh, JJ.
Case 2:06-cv-00720-WHA-SRW Document 6 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 1 of 1
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CRIMINAL ACTION NO.

) 1:06cr206-MHT

ALETHIA ADRIANNE SCOTT )

ORDER

It is ORDERED as follows:

(1) Counsel for defendant Alethia Adrianne Scott

having orally informed the court that she has no

objection, the government’s motion to continue sentencing

(doc. no. 56) is granted.

(2) Sentencing for defendant Scott, now set for

January 31, 2007, is reset for February 16, 2007, at 8:30

a.m. at the Frank M. Johnson, Jr. United States

Courthouse Complex, Courtroom 2FMJ, One Church Street,

Montgomery, Alabama.

DONE, this the 5th day of December, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00206-MHT-CSC Document 57 Filed 12/05/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### § 900.400 General.

Referenda for the purpose of ascertaining whether the issuance by the Secretary of Agriculture of a marketing order to regulate the handling of any fruit, vegetable, or nut, or product thereof, or the continuance or termination of such an order, is approved or favored by producers or processors shall, unless supplemented or modified by the Secretary, be conducted in accordance with this subpart.
Exhibit 31.4

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

CERTIFICATION

I, Venugopal Rathi,
certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of NF Investment Corp.;
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 1, 2017



|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Venugopal Rathi                                                  
|Venugopal
Rathi Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
#### § 993.19b Undersized prunes.

*Undersized prunes* means prunes which pass freely through a round opening of a specified diameter.

[37 FR 861, Jan. 20, 1972]