alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed June 

18, 2019.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-19-00424-CV

IN RE MEREDITH JOHNSON, Relator 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING 

WRIT OF MANDAMUS 

 309th District Court 

Harris County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 2017-62105 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

On May 21, 2019, relator Meredith Johnson filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (Supp.); see also Tex. 

R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Linda 

Dunston, presiding judge of the 309th District Court of Harris County, to vacate the 
2 

portion of her May 9, 2019 order denying Meredith’s motion to decline jurisdiction 

under section 152.207 of the Texas Family Code. 

To obtain mandamus relief, a relator must show that the trial court clearly 

abused its discretion. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) 

(orig. proceeding); In re Garza, 544 S.W.3d 836, 840 (Tex. 2018) (orig. proceeding) 

(per curiam). Relator has not shown that the trial court clearly abused its discretion. 

We therefore deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Hassan.
#### State Commission for Human Rights, Appellant, v. Sary Lieber et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding by the State Commission for Human Rights pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to enforce an order of said commission dated September 23, 1966, the commission appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 26, 1967 and made on reargument, as (1) denied the commission’s application to enforce its order in its entirety and (2) vacated said order of the commission and remitted the matter to the commission for a new public hearing after notice to the respondents. The appeal is now being decided on the merits, the proceeding having been remitted to this court for that purpose by the Court of Appeals *(Matter of State Comm. for Human Rights*v. *Lieber,*23 N Y 2d 253, revg. 29 A D 2d 663). Order affirmed, without costs. In our opinion it was not an improvident exercise of discretion for Special Term to have ordered the matter remitted to the commission. However, we again point out, as we did in our previous decision *(Matter of State Comm. for Human Rights*v. *Lieber,*29 A D 2d 663, *supra),*that it would not be improper for the court to enforce an order directing that respondent Lieber notify the complainant of the *831first available three-room vacancy even though similar relief was granted to the complainant in another proceeding involving a different landlord. Brennan, Acting P. J., Hopkins,. Benjamin, Munder and Martuseello, JJ., concur.
#### Tamara Vid et al., Appellants, v Glenn J. Kaufman et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Submitted October 15, 2007;

decided November 20, 2007

Reported below, 39 AD3d 740.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS  IN  RENT-A-WRECK  OF AMERICA,  INC.'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE  QUARTERLY
PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FORM 10-QSB.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,647,738
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,524,101
<ALLOWANCES>                                   726,722
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,735,290
<PP&E>                                         605,195
<DEPRECIATION>                                 294,499
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,258,302
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,203,418
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           13,660
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        41,288
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,999,936
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,258,302
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,285,609
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  592,061
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               434,707
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                48,955
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,166
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                226,006
<INCOME-TAX>                                    59,342
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            166,664
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   166,664
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 34.5


[LOGO]

                          KPMG LLP
                          1601 Market Street
                          Philadelphia, PA 19103-2499

             Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Members
Regulus Group LLC:

We have examined management's assessment for those customers that management has
informed us have requested confirmation of compliance, included in the
accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing
Criteria, that Regulus Group LLC complied with the servicing criteria set forth
in Item 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) of the Securities and Exchange
Commission's Regulation AB for remittance processing services to those issuers
of asset backed securities and servicers of loan and/or receivables portfolios
that include pool assets for asset backed securities transactions (the Platform)
as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006. Regulus Group LLC has determined
that the remainder of the servicing criteria are not applicable to the
activities it performs with respect to the Platform as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2006. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with
those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
management's assessment about the Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of
less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that
comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities
related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those
selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with
the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected
transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period
covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether
errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may
have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company
during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any
other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the
Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assessment that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006
is fairly stated, in all material respects.

                                          /s/ KPMG LLP

Philadelphia, PA
February 22, 2007

          KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, is the U.S.
             member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) Criminal Case No. 2:06-mj-069-DRB

)

ROSA E. RINCON )

MOTION FOR FUNDS TO EMPLOY INTERPRETER

COMES NOW Defendant, by and through counsel, and prays that this Court will

authorize him to employ Ms. Beverly M. Childress, 24178 Antioch Rd., Andalusia, AL 36420, as

a translator in this case at the expense of the government. As grounds Defendant would show as

follows:

1. Ms. Rincon does not speak English.

2. Ms. Rincon’s attorney’s facility with Spanish is inadequate to assure accurate

communications and, thus, competent representation.

3. The absence of a federally certified interpreter would prejudice the right of Defendant to a

fair trial.

4. Ms. Rincon is incarcerated, is indigent, and is without funds with which to employ an

interpreter.

5. Ms. Childress is a federally certified interpreter who is well known to this Court. Ms.

Childress has agreed to accept appointment.

WHEREFORE, the premises considered, Defendant prays that the Court will appoint,

and/or permit counsel to employ at the expense of the government, Ms. Beverly Childress as

interpreter for Defendant.

Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 25 Filed 07/24/2006 Page 1 of 2
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, this __24th__ day of July, 2006.

/s/ JAY LEWIS

Law Offices of Jay Lewis, L.L.C.

P.O. Box 5059

Montgomery, Alabama 36103

(334) 263-7733 (Voice)

(334) 832-4390 (Fax)

J-Lewis@JayLewisLaw.com

ASB-2014-E66J

Attorney for Defendant

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the _24_ day of July, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing

to the following parties or counsel:

Terry Moorer

Office of the United States Attorney

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, AL 36104

/s/ JAY LEWIS

Law Offices of Jay Lewis, L.L.C.

P.O. Box 5059

Montgomery, Alabama 36103

(334) 263-7733 (Voice)

(334) 832-4390 (Fax)

J-Lewis@JayLewisLaw.com

ASB-2014-E66J

Attorney for Defendant

Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 25 Filed 07/24/2006 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

M IDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABA M A

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

February 28, 2008

NOTICE OF CORRECTION

From: Clerk’s Office

Case Style: Great American Insurance Company v. Stephens et al

Case Number: 2:06-mc-03334-MHT

This Notice of Correction was filed in the referenced case this date to attach the correct PDF

document previously attached to include a certificate of service. 

The correct PDF document is attached to this notice for your review. Reference is made to

document # 13 filed on February 27, 2008.

Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 14 Filed 02/28/2008 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

GREAT AMERICAN INS. CO., § 

 § 

 Plaintiff, § 

 § 

v. § Case No. 2:06mc-03334-MHT 

 § 

CHARLES H. STEPHENS, et al., § 

 § 

 Defendants. § 

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT 

Great American Insurance Company hereby notifies this Court and all other 

affected persons, entities and parties, that the judgment in the amount of 

$761,615.81 entered in favor of Great American Insurance Company and against 

the Defendants, Charles H. Stephens, Floy Stephens, Gary L. Bennett, and Kay 

Bennett, entered by the United States District Court of the Eastern District of 

Pennsylvania on August 9, 2006, and subsequently registered in this Court on 

August 23, 2006, has been paid and satisfied in full effective this the 26th day of 

February, 2008. 

 /s/ R. Cooper Shattuck 

R. Cooper Shattuck (SHATR-5109) 

Attorney for Plaintiff, Great American 

Insurance Company 

Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 14-2 Filed 02/28/2008 Page 1 of 3
OF COUNSEL: 

ROSEN HARWOOD, P.A. 

2117 Jack Warner Parkway 

Post Office Box 2727 

Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35403 

Telephone: (205) 344-5000 

Facsimile: (205) 758-8358 

\\server2k3\vol1\frances\shattuck\gaic\bennett - stephens\collection on judgment\pleadings\word pleading drafts\satisfaction of judgment middle district.doc 

Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 14-2 Filed 02/28/2008 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have served a copy of the foregoing on the following 

parties in this proceeding by mailing same by United States mail, properly 

addressed and first class postage prepaid, and/or sent electronically via the 

CM/ECF system on this 27th day of February, 2008. 

Armen Shahinian 

Robert T. Carlton, Jr. 

Wolff & Samson PC 

One Boland Drive 

West Orange, NJ 07052 

Travis Kreiser 

Ewing & Kreiser PC 

500 Fayette Street #201 

Conshohocken, PA 19428 

Henry J. Costa, Jr. 

Flamm Boroff Bacine PC 

925 Harvest Drive, Suite 220 

Blue Bell, PA 19422 

Richard J. Joyce 

Reager & Adler PC 

2331 Market Street 

Camp Hill, PA 17011 

Gary L. Bennett 

3301 Afton Way 

Birmingham, AL 35242 

Kay Bennett 

3301 Afton Way 

Birmingham, AL 35242 

 /s/ R. Cooper Shattuck 

R. Cooper Shattuck (SHATR-5109) 

Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 14-2 Filed 02/28/2008 Page 3 of 3
#### § 12.305 Settlement.

The applicant and the NRC counsel may agree on a proposed settlement of the award before final action on the application, either in connection with a settlement of the underlying proceeding, or after the underlying proceeding has been concluded, in accordance with the NRC's standard settlement procedure. If a prevailing party and the NRC's counsel agree on a proposed settlement of an award before an application has been filed, the application shall be filed with the proposed settlement.
PUBLIC LAW 109–315—OCT. 10, 2006 120 STAT. 1741

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5664:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):

Sept. 20, considered and passed House.

Sept. 29, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–315

109th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 110 Cooper

Street in Babylon, New York, as the ‘‘Jacob Samuel Fletcher Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JACOB SAMUEL FLETCHER POST OFFICE BUILDING.

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal

Service located at 110 Cooper Street in Babylon, New York, shall

be known and designated as the ‘‘Jacob Samuel Fletcher Post Office

Building’’.

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation,

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference

to the ‘‘Jacob Samuel Fletcher Post Office Building’’.

Approved October 10, 2006.

Oct. 10, 2006

[H.R. 5664]
Exhibit
32.2


Certification
of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009 (the “Report”) of United States Natural Gas Fund, LP (the “Registrant”), as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Howard
Mah, the Chief Financial Officer of United States Commodity Funds LLC, General
Partner of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge,
that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.







Date:  March
      1, 2010
                  By:
                  /s/
      Howard
      MahName:
                    Title:
                  Howard
      Mah
                    Chief
      Financial Officer
                    United
      States Commodity Funds LLC,
                    General
      Partner of United States Natural Gas Fund,
LP
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 27 Filed 12/18/2006 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 27 Filed 12/18/2006 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 27 Filed 12/18/2006 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 27 Filed 12/18/2006 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 27 Filed 12/18/2006 Page 5 of 5
SUBCHAPTER E - GENERAL CONTRACTING

REQUIREMENTS

PART 1527 - PATENTS, DATA, AND COPYRIGHTS

PART 1528 - BONDS OF INSURANCE

PART 1529 - TAXES

PART 1530 - COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

PART 1531 - CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES

PART 1532 - CONTRACT FINANCING

PART 1533 - PROTESTS, DISPUTES AND APPEALS

PART 1527 - PATENTS, DATA, AND COPYRIGHTS

Subpart 1527.4 - Rights in Data and Copyrights

1527.404 Basic rights in data clause.

1527.409 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.

PART 1528 - BONDS OF INSURANCE

Subpart 1528.3 - Insurance

1528.301 Insurance liability to third persons.

PART 1529 - TAXES

Subpart 1529.3 - State and Local Taxes

1529.303 Application of State and local taxes to Government contractors and

subcontractors.

Subpart 1529.4 [Reserved]

PART 1530 - COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

Subpart 1530.3 - CAS Contract Requirements [Reserved]

PART 1531 - CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES

Subpart 1531.1 - Applicability [Reserved]

PART 1532 - CONTRACT FINANCING

1532.003 Simplified acquisition procedures financing.

1532.006 Reduction or suspension of contract payments upon finding of fraud.

1532.006-1 General.

1532.006-2 Definitions.

1532.006-3 Responsibilities.

Subpart 1532.1 - General

1532.102 Description of contract financing methods.

1532.111 Contract clauses.

1532.170 Forms.

Subpart 1532.2 - Commercial Item Purchase Financing

1532.201 Statutory authority.

Subpart 1532.4 - Advance Payments [Reserved]

Subpart 1532.8 - Assignment of Claims

1532.805 Procedure.

1532.805-70 Forms.

Subpart 1532.9 - Prompt Payment

1532.908 Contract clauses.

Subpart 1532.10 - Unenforceability of Unauthorized Obligations

1532.1070 Contract Clauses.

PART 1533 - PROTESTS, DISPUTES AND APPEALS
Subpart 1533.1 - Protests

1533.103 Protests to the Agency.

Subpart 1533.2 - Disputes and Appeals

1533.203 Applicability.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1045

#### Editorial Notes:Nomenclature changes to part 1045 appear at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023, and 88 FR 82238, Nov. 24, 2023.

§ 1045.75 Are there prohibitions against information being classified, remaining classified, or prevented from being declassified as RD, FRD, or TFNI?

Editorial Notes:

Nomenclature changes to part 1045 appear at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023, and 88 FR 82238, Nov. 24, 2023.

(a) Yes. Information must not be classified or remain classified as RD, FRD, or TFNI to accomplish the purposes described in paragraphs (b) through (g) of this section. Persons must also not prevent information from being declassified as RD, FRD, or TFNI for the purposes described in paragraphs (b) through (g) of this section.

(b) Conceal violations of law, inefficiency, or administrative error;

(c) Prevent embarrassment to a person, organization, or agency;

(d) Restrain competition;

(e) Prevent or delay the release of information that does not require protection for the national security or nonproliferation reasons;

(f) Unduly restrict dissemination by assigning an improper classification level; or

(g) Prevent or delay the release of information bearing solely on the physical environment or public or worker health and safety.
Exhibit 99(a)





Citizens Financial Corp.





Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley


Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350





I, Robert J. Schoonover, President and Chief Executive Officer of Citizens Financial Corp. (the Company) certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 that:





|1. |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|2. |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




/s/    ROBERT J. SCHOONOVERRobert J. Schoonover President Chief Executive Officer





Date:    11/6/02




25
# Subpart 2429.1 - General

**Parent topic:**PART 2429 - TAXES

## 2429.101 Resolving tax problems.

In order to have uniformity in HUD's treatment of the tax aspects of contracting and ensure effective cooperation with other Government agencies on tax matters of mutual interest, the Office of General Counsel has the responsibility within HUD for handling all those tax problems. Therefore, the contracting activity will not engage in negotiation with any taxing authority for the purpose of determining the validity or applicability of, or obtaining exemptions from or refund of, any tax. When a problem exists, the Contracting Officer shall request, in writing, the assistance of legal counsel. The request shall detail the problem and be accompanied by appropriate backup data. Counsel shall report to the Contracting Officer as to the necessary disposition of the tax problem. The Contracting Officer will notify the contractor of the outcome of the tax problem. Counsel is responsible for communications with the Department of Justice for representation or intervention in proceedings concerning taxes.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jamie Smith, Appellant.

Submitted November 19, 2007;

decided January 10, 2008

Reported below, 44 AD3d 920.

Motion for leave to appeal granted. Motion for poor person relief granted.
1417.605 Award, renewal and extension.       The CO shall review each management and operating contract prior to any extension or exercise of a renewal option. Any extension or renewal of a management and operating contract shall first be authorized as required in 1417.602.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1417.6 - Management and Operating Contracts
§ 110.10 General. ( a ) In response to a request or on its own initiative, the Commission may grant an exemption from the regulations in this part, if it determines that the exemption: ( 1 ) Is authorized by law;
( 2 ) Is not inimical to the common defense and security; and
( 3 ) Does not constitute an unreasonable risk to the public health and safety.
( b ) An exemption from statutory licensing requirements, as authorized by sections 57d, 62, and 81 of the Atomic Energy Act, will be granted only after coordination with the Executive Branch.
( c ) The granting of an exemption does not relieve any person from complying with the regulations of other U.S. Federal and/or State government agencies applicable to exports or imports under their authority.
[49 FR 47198, Dec. 3, 1984, as amended at 58 FR 13003, Mar. 9, 1993; 65 FR 70290, Nov. 22, 2000; 75 FR 44087, July 28, 2010]