alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

EXHIBIT 31.1

                    SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Michael J. Pankey, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Long Beach Acceptance Corp., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D
required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form
10-K of Long Beach Acceptance Auto Receivables Trust 2006-B (the "Exchange Act
periodic reports");

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole,
do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and
based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the
servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of
Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the
servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreements; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-back securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of
compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be
included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of
noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on
Form 10-K.

Date: March 29, 2006

By: Long Beach Acceptance Corp., as Servicer

/s/ Michael J. Pankey
------------------------------------
        Michael J. Pankey
        Executive Vice President and
        Chief Financial Officer
```
#### Ronald Lowe, III, an Infant, by His Father and Natural Guardian, Ronald Lowe, et al., Plaintiffs, v Dollar Tree Stores, Inc., Also Known as Dollar Tree New York, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Mainkey Toys, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

Submitted June 18, 2007;

decided September 6, 2007

Reported below, 40 AD3d 264.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Case 3:06-cv-00742-MEF-WC Document 1 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 1 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00742-MEF-WC Document 1 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 2 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00742-MEF-WC Document 1 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 3 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00742-MEF-WC Document 1 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 4 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00742-MEF-WC Document 1 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 5 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00742-MEF-WC Document 1 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 6 of 6
§ 1004.7 Responses by authorizing officials: Form and content. ( a ) *Form of grant.* Records requested pursuant to § 1004.4 will be made available promptly, when they are identified and determined to be nonexempt under this Regulation, the FOIA, and where the applicable fees are $15 or less or where it has been determined that the payment of applicable fees should be waived. Where the applicable fees exceed $15, the records may be made available before all charges are paid.
( b ) *Form of denial.* A reply denying a request for a record will be in writing. It will be signed by a FOIA Officer or the Denying Official pursuant to § 1004.5 (b) or
( c ) and will include: ( 1 ) *Reason for denial.* A statement of the reason for denial, containing a reference to the specific exemption under the FOIA authorizing the withholding of the record and a brief explanation of how the exemption applies to the record withheld, and a statement of why a discretionary release is not appropriate. The amount of information deleted and the applicable exemption will be indicated on the released portion of the record, unless the indication would harm an interest protected by the exemption.
( 2 ) *Persons responsible for denial.* A statement setting forth the name and the title or position of each Denying Official and identifying the portion of the denial for which each Denying Official is responsible.
( 3 ) *Segregation of nonexempt material.* A statement or notation addressing the issue of whether there is any segregable nonexempt material in the documents or portions thereof identified as being denied.
( 4 ) *Adequacy of search.* Although a determination that no such record is known to exist is not a denial, the requester will be informed that a challenge may be made to the adequacy of the search by appealing within 90 calendar days to the Office of Hearings and Appeals.
( 5 ) *Administrative appeal.* A statement that the determination to deny documents made within the statutory time period may be appealed within 90 calendar days to the Office of Hearings and Appeals.
[53 FR 15661, May 3, 1988, as amended at 79 FR 22858, Apr. 25, 2014; 81 FR 94920, Dec. 27, 2016]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          40,549
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,560
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   300
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    196,833
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          26,885
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            27,802
<LOANS>                                        634,863
<ALLOWANCE>                                      6,817
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 948,165
<DEPOSITS>                                     675,872
<SHORT-TERM>                                    50,933
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              5,679
<LONG-TERM>                                     96,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,796
<OTHER-SE>                                      99,085
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 948,165
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 26,813
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                6,324
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   646
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                33,783
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              10,622
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,225
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           20,558
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      600
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  41
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 11,489
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,497
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      12,497
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,414
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .69
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.95
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,477
<LOANS-PAST>                                     2,077
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   317
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  5,930
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 6,883
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      857
<RECOVERIES>                                       154
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                6,817
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             4,215
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          2,602


</TABLE>
P.1 

OAR Box 1830 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

139) IV-C-105 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 11/13/2008 7:20:58 AM Sheet 139 of 232 
P.2 

P-67-V2-1 

i £% \ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

ANN ARBOR. MICHIGAN 48105 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

-***f 

APR 2 0 I988 

Mr. Gordon E. Allardyce 

Certification & Regulatory Programs 

Chrysler Corporation 

1200 Chrysler Drive 

Highland Park, MI 4828-1118 

Dear Mr. Allardyce: 

As you know, the simplified onboard refueling control 

system which EPA has developed uses a Chrysler ball-in-cage 

valve at the end of the fillpipe for spitback control. In a 

recent review of this system with representative of the 

Department of Transportation, Mr. James Britell of the Office 

of Motor Carrier Safety raised a question concerning the long 

term durability of this device. In particular, he was 

concerned that in-use factors such as road vibrations or 

repeated use of the valve could lead to valve failure. 

Since this valve is already being used by Chrysler, we 

would appreciate your responding to Mr. Britell's concerns. 

Would you please describe your assessment of the durability of 

this valve, including any relevant testing or field experience, 

and address the affects of vibration and usage on the valve. 

Please also describe the specific effects of any known failure 

modes on the valve operation and discuss their safety 

implications. 

Thank you for your assistance in this matter. If you have 

any further questions, please contact Mr. John Anderson of my 

staff at (313) 668-4496. 

Sincerely yours,,. 

Charles L. Gray; dr. 

Director 

Emission Control Technology Division 

ec: Docket A-87-11 
P.3 

r t.w-t-'k-i v i_t_/ 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

MAY - 9 1988 

CENTRAL DOCKET 

SECTION
#### Cyla Stern et al., Respondents, v Paul A. Epstein et al., Appellants.

[817 NYS2d 299]

*779In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (F. Rivera, J.), dated May 17, 2005, as, after a hearing on the issue of residency for purposes of venue, denied the defendants’ motion to change venue from Kings County to Nassau County.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Kings County, is directed to deliver to the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, all papers filed in this action and certified copies of all minutes and entries *(see*CPLR 511 [d]).

The plaintiffs’ use of their medical office in Kings County to sleep over for convenience a couple of nights a week did not render them residents of Kings County for venue purposes *(see Samuel v Green,*276 AD2d 687 [2000]; *Katz v Siroty,*62 AD2d 1011 [1978]; *Hammerman v Louis Watch Co.,*7 AD2d 817 [1958]; *cf. Ellis v Wirshba,*18 AD3d 805 [2005]). Accordingly, the defendants’ motion to change venue from Kings County to Nassau County, where the plaintiffs’ principal residence is located and where all of the defendants reside, should have been granted. Florio, J.P., Santucci, Mastro, Rivera and Covello, JJ., concur.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________ 

No. 1D18-3998 

_____________________________ 

MARK A. MERRILL, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

STATE OF FLORIDA; MARK S.

INCH, Florida Department of 

Corrections, 

Respondents. 

_____________________________ 

Petition for Belated Appeal—Original Jurisdiction. 

March 18, 2019 

PER CURIAM. 

Because this amended petition seeks belated appeal of a 

lower tribunal order in a civil matter, the amended petition is 

denied. See Powell v. Fla. Dep’t of Corrections, 727 So. 2d 1103 

(Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (stating that because the proceedings below 

were civil in nature, the provisions of Florida Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 9.141(c) are not applicable). Petitioner may seek relief 

in the lower tribunal by a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of 

Civil Procedure 1.540. See Welch v. Department of Corrections, 

238 So. 3d 1281 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018). 
2 

BILBREY, WINOKUR, and JAY, JJ., concur. 

_____________________________ 

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331. 

_____________________________ 

Mark A. Merrill, pro se, Petitioner. 

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Daniel Krumbholz, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondents.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

BARRY SNEED

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 1354

[ July 19, 2018 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Bernard I. Bober

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 98

- 4592 CF10A

.

Barry Sneed, Zephyrhills, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER

, C.J., M AY and C IKLIN

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### § 1042.100 Purpose and effective date.

The purpose of these Title IX regulations is to effectuate Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (except sections 904 and 906 of those Amendments) (20 U.S.C. 1681, 1682, 1683, 1685, 1686, 1687, 1688), which is designed to eliminate (with certain exceptions) discrimination on the basis of sex in any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance, whether or not such program or activity is offered or sponsored by an educational institution as defined in these Title IX regulations. The effective date of these Title IX regulations is February 20, 2001.
#### § 985.66 Derogation.

Nothing contained in this part is, or shall be construed to be, in derogation or in modification of the rights of the Secretary or of the United States (a) to exercise any powers granted by the act or otherwise, or (b) in accordance with such powers, to act in the premises whenever such action is deemed advisable.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1107 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1107

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      December 8, 2006.
    Resolved, That a revised edition of the Rules and Manual of the House of 
Representatives for the One Hundred Tenth Congress be printed as a House 
document, and that three thousand additional copies shall be printed and bound 
for the use of the House of Representatives, of which nine hundred copies shall 
be bound in leather with thumb index and delivered as may be directed by the 
Parliamentarian of the House.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) 2:06mj72-DRB

)

JOSHUA WAYNE HESTER )

ORDER ON MOTIONS

At the initial appearance today for this defendant on a criminal complaint filed July 24,

2006) (Doc. 1), the court appointed counsel made an oral motion for a preliminary hearing. The

United States filed its Motion for Detention Hearing (Doc. 3, August 1, 2006), it is, therefore, 

ORDERED that defendant’s oral motion for a preliminary hearing is GRANTED, and

the Government’s Motion is GRANTED to the extent of its request for a detention hearing. The

preliminary hearing and detention hearing are consolidated for hearing at 3:00 p.m. on August 2,

2006, in District Courtroom 4A, Frank M. Johnson United States Courthouse Complex, 1 Church

Street, Montgomery, AL 36104.

Pending the hearing, the defendant shall be held in the custody of the U.S. Marshal and

produced for the hearing. 

Done this 1 day of August, 2006. st

/s/ Vanzetta Penn McPherson

VANZETTA PENN MCPHERSON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

FOR 

DELORES R. BOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00193-MEF-CSC Document 5 Filed 08/01/2006 Page 1 of 1
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 169 

Recognizing the importance of sun safety, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2005 

Mr. BILIRAKIS (for himself and Ms. ESHOO) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the importance of sun safety, and for other 

purposes. 

Whereas Americans of all ages cherish the pleasures of outdoor activities, and too few recognize that overexposure 

to the sun and its ultraviolet radiation, classified by the 

Department of Health and Human Services as a known 

carcinogen, is the leading cause of skin cancer; 

Whereas it is critically important to be safe in the sun because skin cancer is the fastest growing cancer in our 

country today, affecting 1 in 5 Americans during their 

lifetimes and killing 1 person every hour of every day; 

Whereas more than 1,000,000 new cases of skin cancer will 

be diagnosed in the United States this year, accounting 

for nearly half of all new cases of cancer and exceeding 
2 

•HRES 169 IH 

the incidence of breast, prostate, lung, and colon cancer 

combined; 

Whereas most people receive approximately 80 percent of 

their lifetime sun exposure by age 18, setting the stage 

for skin cancer later in life; 

Whereas skin cancer is highly preventable by taking simple 

precautions when engaged in outdoor activities; 

Whereas research demonstrates that practicing good sun 

safety has the potential to significantly reduce the risk of 

skin cancer; 

Whereas the Sun Safety Alliance and its members have dedicated themselves to promoting sun safety, eliminating 

skin cancer from excessive sun exposure, and encouraging 

sun protection practices, especially among children; and 

Whereas the Sun Safety Alliance has designated the week of 

June 5, 2005, to June 11, 2005, as National Sun Safety 

Week: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the importance of sun safety; 

3 (2) recognizes the need for school-based sun 

4 safety education programs; 

5 (3) encourages all Americans to protect them6 selves and their children from the dangers of exces7 sive sun exposure; 

8 (4) congratulates the Sun Safety Alliance for 

9 its efforts to promote sun safety and prevent skin 

10 cancer; and 
3 

•HRES 169 IH 

1 (5) supports the goals and ideas of National 

2 Sun Safety Week. 

Æ
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Venture Lending & Leasing V, Inc. (the "Fund") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Maurice C. Werdegar, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Fund, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Fund.





/S/ Maurice C. Werdegar


Maurice C. Werdegar


President and Chief Executive Officer


March 15, 2013
#### Household Finance Realty Corporation of New York, Respondent, v Peter Gonzalez et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Submitted August 20, 2007;

decided September 11, 2007

Reported below, 39 AD3d 1138.

Motion for reconsideration of this Court’s July 2, 2007 dismissal order denied *[see 9*NY3d 859].
exv10w5





Exhibit 10.5




AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




     This amendment (the “Amendment”), effective as of January 1, 2009, amends the
Agreementi between Steven Fredrickson (“Employee”) and the Company, dated November 14,
2008.



     If, during the term of the Agreement, an event that would be considered a Separation from
Service (as that term is defined by the Internal Revenue Service) occurs that makes Employee
eligible to receive a form of termination paymentii, the Company shall not issue such
payment prior to the expiration of six (6) months from the Date of Termination.



     If there is any conflict between this Amendment and the Agreement, the Amendment shall
prevail. Except as provided herein, the terms of the Agreement remain unchanged.



     IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment.



Dated: December 31, 2008




PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, INC.




	 	 	 	 	 
	By: 

Name:

	 	/s/ Judith S. Scott
 

Judith S. Scott
	 	 
	Title:

	 	General Counsel	 	 






EMPLOYEE




Steven Fredrickson




	 	 	 
	/s/ Steve Fredrickson
 


	 	 








 




			
	i	 	Capitalized terms not defined herein shall
have the same meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement.
	 
	ii	 	Such events may include, but are not limited
to termination for disability, constructive termination and or non-renewal of
the Agreement, if applicable.
1405.502 Authority.

(a) The CO shall obtain written authorization of the HCA before placing an advertisement in a

newspaper to advertise a contracting opportunity.

(b) Advertisements placed in media other than newspapers do not require advance authorization.

Parent topic: Subpart 1405.5 - Paid Advertisements