alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 223 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 223

  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that a postage 
     stamp should be issued in commemoration of Diwali, a festival 
                 celebrated by people of Indian origin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 20, 2005

 Mr. Pallone submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that a postage 
     stamp should be issued in commemoration of Diwali, a festival 
                 celebrated by people of Indian origin.

    Resolved,  That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that--
            (1) a postage stamp should be issued by the United States 
        Postal Service in commemoration of Diwali, a festival 
        celebrated by people of Indian origin; and
            (2) the Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee of the United 
        States Postal Service should recommend to the Postmaster 
        General that such a stamp be issued.
                                 <all>
```
605.502 Authority.       (a) For paid advertisements in newspapers within the United States, the head of the contracting activity is the agency head's designee for the purposes of FAR 5.502(a). For acquisitions by overseas posts necessitating paid advertisements in newspapers outside the United States, the head of the contracting activity is the agency's head's designee for the purposes of FAR 5.502(a). When the head of the contracting activity is the contracting officer for the acquisition, no further approvals are necessary.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 605.5—Paid Advertisements
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

OWEN J. ROGAL, D.D.S., )

P.C. d/b/a THE PAIN CENTER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 3:06cv711-MHT

) 

SKILSTAF, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

OWEN J. ROGAL, D.D.S., )

P.C. d/b/a THE PAIN CENTER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 3:06cv728-MHT

) 

SKILSTAF, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the above-styled cases are not

consolidated on the merits.

DONE, this the 18th day of October, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 30 Filed 10/18/2006 Page 1 of 1
§ 983.71 Assessments. ( a ) Each handler who receives pistachios for processing in each production year, except as provided in § 983.58, shall pay the committee on demand, an assessment based on the *pro rata* share of the expenses authorized by the Secretary for that year attributable to the assessed weight of pistachios received by that handler in that year.
( b ) The committee, prior to the beginning of each production year, shall recommend and the Secretary shall set the assessment for the following production year, which shall not exceed one-half of one percent of the average price received by producers in the preceding production year. The committee, with the approval of the Secretary, may revise the assessment if it determines, based on information including crop size and value, that the action is necessary, and if the revision does not exceed the assessment limitation specified in this section and is made prior to the final billing of the assessment.
[69 FR 17850, Apr. 4, 2004. Redesignated and amended at 74 FR 56540, Nov. 2, 2009]
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-30917

Conference Calendar

__________________

DONNA ANCAR, wife of/and; TROY ANCAR,

 Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CV-1560

- - - - - - - - - -

April 19, 1996

Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Donna Ancar and Troy Ancar appeal the judgment of the

district court dismissing their action for damages under the

Public Vessels Act pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). They

concede that Supreme Court precedent is adverse to their position

and argue that the prior decisions are flawed in concept and

methodology. The appeal is without arguable merit and is

dismissed as frivolous.

 APPEAL DISMISSED.
Exhibit
23.1








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM











We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement Number
333-159772 on Form S-3 of our report dated February 26, 2010 relating to the
financial statements of United States Natural Gas Fund, LP as of December 31,
2009 and 2008 and for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 and the
effectiveness of United States Natural Gas Fund, LP’s internal control over
financial reporting dated February 26, 2010, appearing in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of United States Natural Gas Fund, LP for the year ended December 31,
2009.








/s/ SPICER JEFFRIES
      LLP





Greenwood
Village, Colorado


March 1,
2010
# Subpart 327.3 - Patent Rights Under Government Contracts

**Parent topic:**PART 327 - PATENTS, DATA, AND COPYRIGHTS

## 327.303 Solicitation provision and contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 352.227-11, Patent Rights - Exceptional Circumstances and any appropriate alternates in lieu of Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 52.227-11 whenever a Determination of Exceptional Circumstances (DEC) involving the provision of materials that has been executed in accordance with Agency policy and procedures calls for its use and the clause at 352.227-11, Patent Rights - Exceptional Circumstances, appropriately covers the circumstances. The contracting officer should reference the DEC in the solicitation and shall attach a copy of the executed DEC to the contract.
PUBLIC LAW 109–297—OCT. 5, 2006 120 STAT. 1471

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 176:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 109–681 (Comm. on Energy and Commerce).

SENATE REPORTS: No. 109–29 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:

Vol. 151 (2005): July 26, considered and passed Senate.

Vol. 152 (2006): Sept. 26, considered and passed House.

Æ

Public Law 109–297

109th Congress

An Act

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a hydroelectric project

in the State of Alaska.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY

COMMISSION PROJECT.

Notwithstanding the time period specified in section 13 of the

Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply

to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project numbered

11480, the Commission may, at the request of the licensee for

the project, and after reasonable notice, in accordance with the

good faith, due diligence, and public interest requirements of that

section and the Commission’s procedures under that section extend

the time period during which the licensee is required to commence

the construction of the project for 3 consecutive 2-year periods

beyond the date that is 4 years after the date of issuance of

the license.

Approved October 5, 2006.

Oct. 5, 2006

[S. 176]
Subpart 3006.1—Full and Open Competition

Parent topic: PART 3006—COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS

3006.101 Policy.

3006.101-70 Definitions.

As used in this part:

Agency competition advocate means an individual designated by the Chief Procurement Officer

(CPO) to perform, at a minimum, the functions under (FAR) 48 CFR 6.502(b) and is synonymous with

“Departmental Competition Advocate” and “Senior Competition Advocate (SCA).”

Competition advocate for the procuring activity means the individual who has been designated by

the Component to approve Justifications and Approvals (J & A) for other than full and open

competition as permitted by the (FAR) 48 CFR 6.304 and to perform the duties and responsibilities

assigned under (FAR) 48 CFR 6.502. This term is synonymous with “procuring activity competition

advocate.”
Subpart 1341.2 - Acquiring Utility Services

Parent topic: PART 1341 - ACQUISITION OF UTILITY SERVICES

1341.201 Policy.

The designee authorized to enter into a contract pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 8287 (regarding shared

energy savings, including cogeneration) is set forth in CAM 1301.70.

1341.202 Procedures.

The designee authorized to approve a determination that a written contract cannot be obtained from

a utility supplier refusing to execute a tendered contract, and that the issuance of a purchase order

is not feasible, is set forth in CAM 1301.70.

1341.204 GSA areawide Contracts.

The designee authorized to determine that the use of an areawide contract is not advantageous to

the Government is set forth in CAM 1301.70.
§ 930.141 Delinquent assessments. ( a ) Pursuant to § 930.41, the Board shall impose an interest charge on any handler whose assessment payment has not been received by October 1 of each crop year. The interest rate shall be a rate of one percent per month and shall be applied to the unpaid assessment balance not paid by the October 1 due date. In addition to the interest charge, the Board shall impose a late payment charge on any handler whose assessment payment has not been received within 90 days from the due date of October 1. The late payment charge shall be 10 percent of the unpaid balance.
( b ) [Reserved]
[62 FR 55150, Oct. 23, 1997, as amended at 63 FR 14024, Mar. 24, 1998]
Exhibit 10.1







Exhibit 10.1




AMENDMENT 2009-1

TO THE

UGI CORPORATION

SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN AND

SUPPLEMENTAL SAVINGS PLAN




The UGI Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and Supplemental Savings Plan, as amended and restated
effective January 1, 2009 (collectively, the “Plans”), are hereby amended as follows:



1. Section 3.01 of the UGI Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan is hereby amended by adding a new
subsection (e) to read as follows:




“(e) Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Employee who is hired or rehired by UGI or an Affiliate on or after
January 1, 2009, or who is transferred on or after January 1, 2009 into Employee status from an Affiliate that
does not participate in this SERP, shall become a Participant in this SERP on or after January 1, 2009.”



2. Section 3.01 of the UGI Corporation Supplemental Savings Plan is hereby amended by adding a new subsection (d) to
read as follows:




“(e) Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Employee who is hired or rehired by UGI or an Affiliate on or after
January 1, 2009, or who is transferred on or after January 1, 2009 into Employee status from an Affiliate that
does not participate in this SSP, shall become a Participant in this SSP on or after January 1, 2009.”



3. This Amendment 2009-1 shall be effective as of January 1, 2009.



4. In all respects not amended, the Plans are ratified and confirmed.
[J

- 98A&B

- 2016]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

,

Appellee

v.

RONALD LEE DOUGALEWICZ, JR.

,

Appellant :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: Nos. 22 & 23 WAP 2015

Appeal from the Order s of the Superior
Court entered March 30, 2015 at No s . 247
& 248 WDA 2014, affirming the j udgment s of sentence of the Court of Common Pleas of Lawrence County entered September 6,
2013 at No s . CP

- 37

- 0000514

- 2009 and CP

- 37

- CR

- 0001129

- 2009

.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of March , 201 7 , this appeal is dismissed as having

been improvidently granted.

Justices Donohue and Wecht dissent.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2966 

To suspend temporarily the duty on AC electric motors of an output exceeding 

74.6 W but not exceeding 85 W. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 23, 2006 

Mr. FRIST (for himself and Mr. ALEXANDER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on AC electric motors of 

an output exceeding 74.6 W but not exceeding 85 W. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AC ELECTRIC MOTORS OF AN OUTPUT EXCEED4 ING 74.6 W BUT NOT EXCEEDING 85 W. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 2966 IS 

‘‘ 9902.85.06 AC electric motors of an output exceeding 74.6 W but not exceeding 85 W, single phase; each equipped with a capacitor, a speed control mechanism, a motor 

mount of plastics and a self-contained 

gear mechanism for oscillation (provided 

for in subheading 8501.40.40) ................ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
# Subpart 3053.1—General

**Parent topic:**PART 3053—FORMS

## 3053.101 Requirements for use of forms.

Unless excepted, forms prescribed in (FAR) 48 CFR part 53 and (HSAR) 48 CFR part 3053 are required for use by all Components. 

## 3053.103 Exceptions.

Requests for exceptions to forms contained in (FAR) 48 CFR part 53 and to DHS forms in (HSAR) 48 CFR part 3053 shall be submitted, as prescribed in (FAR) 48 CFR 53.103, to the CPO.
#### § 1017.19 Access limitations.

A person may only have access to UCNI if he or she has been granted routine access by an Authorized Individual (see § 1017.20) or limited access by the DOE Program Secretarial Officer or NNSA Deputy or Associate Administrator with cognizance over the UCNI (see § 1017.21). The Secretary, or his or her designee, may impose additional administrative controls concerning the granting of routine or limited access to UCNI to a person who is not a U.S. citizen.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 20

- 50460 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,** Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus
**Hector Reyes**

**- Cardona,**  Defendant

— Appellant

**.**
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:19

- CR

- 2829

- 1

Before **Higginbotham, Jones,** and **Costa ,**  Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** * Hector Reyes

- Cardona appeals his sentence of 21 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release, which the district court imposed following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry. He argues that the recidivism enhancement under 8 U.S. C. § 1326(b) is

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5 .4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 22, 2020 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-50460 Document: 00515683046 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/22/2020No. 20

- 50460

2 unconstitutional because it allows a sentence above the otherwise applicable statutory maximum based on facts that are neither alleged in the indictment nor found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. He concedes that the issue is foreclose d by Almendarez

- Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for further review. The Government moves for summary affirmance, asserting that Reyes

- Cardona ’s argument is foreclosed. The parties are correct that Reyes

- Car dona ’s a ssertion is foreclosed by Almendarez

- Torres

. See United States v. Wallace , 759 F.3d 486, 497 (5th Cir. 2014); United States v. Pineda

- Arrellano , 492 F.3d 624, 625

- 26 (5th Cir. 2007 )

. Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is **GRANTED** , see Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969), the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is **DENIED** as moot , and the judgment of the district court is **AFFIRMED**

. Case: 20-50460 Document: 00515683046 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/22/2020
# Subpart 1331.1 - Applicability

**Parent topic:**PART 1331 - CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES

## 1331.101 Objectives.

The designee authorized to approve individual deviations concerning cost principles is set forth in CAM 1301.70.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000763541
<NAME>                                             PS PARTNERS V, LTD.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                         1
<CURRENCY>                                                      U.S. $
       
<S>                                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                              JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                      1
<CASH>                                                         404,000
<SECURITIES>                                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  186,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               590,000
<PP&E>                                                      71,847,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                            (24,945,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              69,939,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          951,000
<BONDS>                                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                                  37,786,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                69,939,000
<SALES>                                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             3,469,000
<CGS>                                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                1,216,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               668,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                703,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            703,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   703,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                     4.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     4.03
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SECTION 906

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael Hart, the President (Principal Executive Officer) of NF Investment Corp. (the Company), hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  |  | the Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: March 27, 2015/s/ Michael HartMichael HartPresident(Principal Executive Officer)




|* | The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Peter Ortiz, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered on April 19,1978, unanimously affirmed. Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Fein, Ross, Bloom and Carro, JJ.
§ 925.64 Proceedings after termination. ( a ) Upon the termination of the provisions of this part, the committee shall, for the purpose of liquidating the affairs of the committee, continue as trustees of all the funds and property then in its possession, or under its control, including claims for any funds unpaid or property not delivered at the time of such termination. Any action by said trustees shall require the concurrence of a majority of the trustees.
( b ) The said trustees shall: ( 1 ) Continue in such capacity until discharged by the Secretary;
( 2 ) From time to time account for all receipts and disbursements and deliver all property on hand, together with all books and records of the committee and of the trustees, to such persons as the Secretary may direct;
( 3 ) Upon the request of the Secretary, execute such assignments or other instruments necessary or appropriate to vest in such person, full title and right to all of the funds, property, and claims vested in the committee or the trustees pursuant thereto.
( c ) Any person to whom funds, property, or claims have been transferred or delivered, pursuant to this section, shall be subject to the same obligation imposed upon the committee and upon the trustees.
Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 30 Filed 08/15/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 30 Filed 08/15/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 30 Filed 08/15/2006 Page 3 of 3