alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

WILLIE MCNAIR, ) 

 ) 

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, ) 

) 

v. ) Case No. 2:06-cv-695-WKW 

 ) 

RICHARD ALLEN, et al., ) 

) 

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. ) 

___________________________________ 

 ) 

JAMES CALLAHAN, ) 

 ) 

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Case No. 2:06-cv-919-WKW 

 ) 

RICHARD ALLEN, et al., ) 

) 

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. ) 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of this court and all parties of record: 

 Enter the undersigned’s appearance as counsel in this case for Plaintiff James Callahan. 

The undersigned is admitted pro hac vice in this action, previously representing only Plaintiff 

McNair. 

Date: November 8, 2007 /s/ Stephanie Cohen

STEPHANIE COHEN 

Bar Number (SDNY): SM7006 

Counsel for Plaintiffs 

White & Case LLP 

1155 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, NY 10036 

Telephone: (212) 819-8200 

Facsimile: (212) 354-8113 

stephcohen@whitecase.com

Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 139-2 Filed 11/08/2007 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on November 8, 2007, a copy of the foregoing was filed electronically with 

the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to 

the following: J. Clayton Crenshaw, James W. Davis, Corey Maze and Jasper Roberts. 

/s/ Peter B. Patterson, Jr. 

Peter B. Patterson, Jr. 

White & Case LLP 

1155 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, NY 10036 

Telephone: (212) 819-8200 

Facsimile: (212) 354-8113 

 ppatterson@whitecase.com

Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 139-2 Filed 11/08/2007 Page 2 of 2
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3575 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain women’s footwear valued over 

$20 a pair with coated or laminated textile fabrics. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 27, 2006 

Mr. CARPER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain women’s footwear valued over $20 a pair with coated or laminated 

textile fabrics. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN WOMEN’S FOOTWEAR VALUED OVER 

4 $20 A PAIR WITH COATED OR LAMINATED 

5 TEXTILE FABRICS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


wwhite on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
2 

•S 3575 IS 

‘‘ 9902.64.07 Women’s footwear, except 

vulcanized footwear and 

footwear with waterproof 

molded bottoms, including 

bottoms comprising an outer 

sole and all or part of the 

upper, valued over $20/pair, 

designed to be worn in lieu 

of, but not over, other footwear as a protection against 

water, oil, grease or chemicals or cold or inclement 

weather where such protection includes protection 

against water that is imparted by the use of a coated or laminated textile fabric 

(provided in subheading 

6402.99.20) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwhite on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
Case 2:06-cr-00193-MEF-CSC Document 43 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 1 of 1
Second Department,

March, 1970

(March 2, 1970)

#### Janet Craft, Appellant, v. George Craft, Respondent.

In an action in which plaintiff was granted a judgment of separation which, *inter alia,*provided that the marital residence owned by the parties as tenants by the entirety be sold *“*at the earliest practical time ”, plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated June 23, 1969, as (1) granted defendant’s motion to compel plaintiff to execute a certain conditional contract of sale that had been signed by defendant and the prospective purchaser and (2) contained other provisions with respect to the contract, constituting in all the first, second, third and sixth decretal paragraphs of the order. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and defendant’s motion denied. In view of the fact that the judgment had awarded custody of the parties’ five children to plaintiff, it was an improvident exercise of discretion for the Special Term to direct that the contract of sale he signed by her *(Zahler*v. *Zahler,*28 A D 2d 925). Under these circumstances, there can be no doubt that now is not the earliest practical time when the premises can be sold. If the trial court had indeed anticipated an immediate sale of the premises, in computing the alimony award, then the court has the power, upon proper application, to modify the alimony award upon the basis of the change in circumstances in the parties’ financial condition which this decision will bring about. We do not reach the question as to whether the court has the power to direct sale of the house. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Munder, Martuscello and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit      31.3**

**RULE      13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)**

**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

| 1)   | I                have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to quarterly report on Form 10-Q                of                Greene County Bancshares, Inc.; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2)   | Based                on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement                of a                material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make                the                statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements                were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this                report. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                     |                                                                                  |                                    |
|------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                                     |                                                                                  |
|                                |                                                                             |                               |
| Date: August                1, 2005 |                                                                                  | /s/ R.                Stan Puckett |
|                                     | R.                Stan Puckett                                                        |
|                                     | Chairman                of the Board and Chief Executive                Officer  |

----
50.102-2 Contract adjustment boards.    The DISA Contract Adjustment Board shall be composed of the following members:       SPE                   ChairpersonHCA                   Vice Chairperson and MemberGeneral Counsel                   MemberThe Board considers and evaluates requests for contract adjustments and recommends appropriate action to the Director. The findings of the Board are advisory. The HCA shall assume staff and administrative cognizance of contract adjustment matters and supply secretarial and recorder services for the operation of the Board.       A majority constitutes a quorum for any purpose and the concurring vote of a majority of the total board membership constitutes an action of the board. Alternates may be appointed to act in the absence of any member. **Parent topic:** SUBPART 50.1 EXTRAORDINARY CONTRACTUAL ACTIONS
#### MANDELSTAMM v. ABE BRILL CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

December 31, 1914.)

Action by Leo Mandelstamm against Abe Brill Company.

No opinion. Application denied, with $10 costs. Order signed.
#### § 993.86 Derogation.

Nothing contained in this subpart is, or shall be construed to be, in derogation or in modification of the rights of the Secretary or of the United States to exercise any powers granted by the act or otherwise, or, in accordance with such powers, to act in the premises whenever such action is deemed advisable.
Case 2:06-cv-00707-ID-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00707-ID-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00707-ID-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00707-ID-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00707-ID-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00707-ID-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 6 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00707-ID-CSC Document 1-2 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 1 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00707-ID-CSC Document 1-2 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 2 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00707-ID-CSC Document 1-2 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 3 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00707-ID-CSC Document 1-2 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 4 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00707-ID-CSC Document 1-2 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 5 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00707-ID-CSC Document 1-2 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 6 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00707-ID-CSC Document 1-2 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 7 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00707-ID-CSC Document 1-2 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 8 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00707-ID-CSC Document 1-2 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 9 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00707-ID-CSC Document 1-2 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 10 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00707-ID-CSC Document 1-2 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 11 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00707-ID-CSC Document 1-2 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 12 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00707-ID-CSC Document 1-2 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 13 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00707-ID-CSC Document 1-2 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 14 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00707-ID-CSC Document 1-2 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 15 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00707-ID-CSC Document 1-3 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00707-ID-CSC Document 1-3 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00707-ID-CSC Document 1-3 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 3 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00707-ID-CSC Document 1-4 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00707-ID-CSC Document 1-4 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00707-ID-CSC Document 1-5 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00707-ID-CSC Document 1-5 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00707-ID-CSC Document 1-5 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 3 of 3
APPENDIX A
Sites

# 1 Gilroy-East, CA

NW: 27.7300, -80.4568 NE: 27.7299, -80.4510

SW: 27.7192, -80.4512 SE: 27.7192, -80.4463
# 2 Gilroy-West, CA

NW: 38.6341, -121.8025 NE: 38.6340, -121.7941

SW: 38.6244, -121.8028 SE: 38.6244, -121.7943
# 3 Woodland, CA

NW: 40.3818, -89.0670 NE: 40.3928, -89.0451

SW: 40.3718, -89.0663 SE: 40.3711, -89.0444
#4 LaSalle, CO

NW: 41.8907, -93.7077 NE: 41.8910, -93.6983

SW: 41.8782, -93.7107 SE: 41.8781, -93.6981
#5 Vero Beach, FL

NW: 40.3339, -104.7300 NE: 40.3342, -104.7176

SW: 40.3303, -104.7301 SE: 40.3276, -104.7252
#6 Slater, IA

NW: 37.0155, -121.5378 NE: 37.0169, -121.5330

SW: 37.0113, -121.5379 SE: 37.0122, -121.5309
#7 Bloomington-H, IL

NW: 37.0118, -121.6191 NE: 37.0115, -121.6033

SW: 37.0086, -121.6190 SE: 37.0076, -121.6033
#8 Clinton, IL

NW: 44.4862, -93.0392 NE: 44.4789, -93.0213

SW: 44.4721, -93.0394 SE: 44.4720, -93.0260
#9 Stanton, MN

NW: 40.4259, -88.9898 NE: 40.4223, -88.9783

SW: 40.4152, -88.9894 SE: 40.4189, -88.9784
#10 Waterloo, NE

NW: 40.2243, -88.9266 NE: 40.2244, -88.9070

SW: 40.2071, -88.9267 SE: 40.2071, -88.9067
Subpart 1632.1—General    **Parent topic:** PART 1632—CONTRACT FINANCING1632.170 Recurring premium payments to carriers.       (a)          (1)  			*Recurring payments to carriers of community-rated plans.* OPM will pay to carriers of community-rated plans the premium payments received for the plan less the amounts credited to the contingency and administrative reserves, amounts assessed under paragraph (a)(2) of this section, and amounts due for other contractual obligations. Premium payments will be due and payable not later than 30 days after receipt by the Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Fund.          (2) The difference between one percent and the performance based percentage of the contract price described at 1615.404–4 will be multiplied by the carrier's subscription income for the year of performance and the resulting amount (performance adjustment) will be withheld from the net-to-carrier premium disbursement during the first quarter of the following contract period unless an alternative payment arrangement is made with the carrier's Contracting Officer. Amounts withheld from a community rated plan's premium disbursement will be deposited into the plan's Contingency Reserve.          (3) Any subsidization penalty levied against a community rated plan as outlined in 48 CFR 1615.402(c)(3)(ii)(B) must be paid within 60 days from notification. If payment is not received within the 60 day period, OPM will withhold from the community rated carriers the periodic premium payment payable until fully recovered. OPM will deposit the withheld funds in the subsidization penalty reserve described in 5 CFR 890.503(c)(6).          (b)          (1)  			*Recurring payments to carriers of experience-rated plans.* OPM will make payments on a letter of credit (LOC) basis. Premium payments received for the plan, less the amounts credited to the contingency and administrative reserves and amounts for other obligations due under the contract, will be made available for carrier drawdown not later than 30 days after receipt by the FEHB Fund.          (2) Withdrawals from the LOC account will be made on a checks-presented basis. Under a checks-presented basis, drawdown on the LOC is delayed until the checks issued for FEHB Program disbursements are presented to the carrier's bank for payment.          (3) OPM may grant a waiver of the restriction of LOC disbursements to a checks-presented basis if the carrier requests the waiver in writing and demonstrates to OPM's satisfaction that the checks-presented basis of LOC disbursements will result in significantly increased liability under the contract, or that the checks-presented basis of LOC disbursements is otherwise clearly and significantly detrimental to the operation of the plan. Payments to carriers that have been granted a waiver may be made by an alternative payment methodology, subject to OPM approval.1632.171 Clause—community-rated contracts.       The clause at 1652.232–70 shall be inserted in all community-rated FEHBP contracts.1632.172 Clause—experience-rated contracts.       The clause at 1652.232–71 shall be inserted in all experience-rated FEHBP contracts.
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

59–011 2006

109th Congress, 2d Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 109–151 

CERTIFICATION FOR AN EXPORT TO THE 

PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA 

COMMUNICATION 

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRANSMITTING

CERTIFICATION THAT THE EXPORT TO THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC 

OF CHINA OF THE SPECIFIED ITEMS IS NOT DETRIMENTAL TO 

THE UNITED STATES SPACE LAUNCH INDUSTRY, AND THAT THE 

MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING ANY INDIRECT TECHNICAL BENEFIT THAT COULD BE DERIVED FROM SUCH EXPORTS, WILL NOT MEASURABLY IMPROVE THE MISSILE OR 

SPACE LAUNCH CAPABILITIES OF THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF 

CHINA, PURSUANT TO PUB. L. 105–261, SEC. 1512 

NOVEMBER 15, 2006.—Referred to the Committee on International 

Relations and ordered to be printed 


CCOLEMAN on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGE:\Seals\Congress.#13

CCOLEMAN on PROD1PC71 with HEARING
(1) 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, November 15, 2006. 

Hon. J. DENNIS HASTERT, 

Speaker of the House of Representatives, 

Washington, DC. 

DEAR MR. SPEAKER: In accordance with the provisions of section 

1512 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

1999 (Public Law 105–261), I hereby certify that the export to the 

People’s Republic of China of the following items is not detrimental 

to the U.S. space launch industry and that the material and equipment, including any indirect technical benefit that could be derived 

from such exports, will not measurably improve the missile or 

space launch capabilities of the People’s Republic of China: 

• Twelve Honeywell model HG1138 inertial measurement 

units to be incorporated into oil pipeline inspection equipment 

by the United Kingdom firm PII Group. 

Sincerely, 

GEORGE W. BUSH. 

Æ 


CCOLEMAN on PROD1PC71 with HEARING
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT

Re: Donna L. Early vs. Rheem Manufacturing Company, et al

 Civil Action No. 2:06cv727-CSC

The above-styled case has been reassigned to District Judge W. Keith

Watkins. 

Please note that the case number is now 2:06cv727-WKW. This new case

number should be used on all future correspondence and pleadings in this

action.

 

Case 2:06-cv-00727-WKW-CSC Document 10 Filed 09/28/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### § 993.503 Size category.

*Size category* means each of the size categories listed in § 993.515 and fixes the range or the limits of the various size counts.
Note Regarding this
Exhibit:  This document provides a written description of an oral
contract entered into between OneUp Innovations, Inc. and
Leslie Vogelman on June 23, 2006.

    


    Parties:

    


    Leslie
Vogelman (“Lender”)

    Treasurer

    OneUp
Innovations, Inc.

    2745
Bankers Industrial Drive

    Atlanta,
GA 30360

    


    OneUp
Innovations, Inc. (the “Company”)

    2745
Bankers Industrial Drive

    Atlanta,
GA 30360

    


    Date:

    


    June 23,
2006

    


    Material
Terms:

    


    This oral
contract was for a subordinated note payable.  The Lender agreed to
provide the Company with loans from time to time to supplement the working
capital of the Company. These loans are unsecured and are subordinated to any
and all other loans that the Company may have.

    


    Interest
on any loans accrues at the Prime Lending rate. The loans have no specific
maturity and are payable upon demand, if the Company has the ability (and the
right) to repay them.
§ 97.18 Applications handled in confidence. ( a ) Pending applications shall be handled in confidence. Except as provided below, no information may be given by the Office respecting the filing of an application, the pendency of any particular application, or the subject matter of any particular application. Also, nor will access be given to or copies furnished of any pending application or papers relating thereto, without written authority of the applicant, or his or her assignee or attorney or agent. Exceptions to the above may be made by the Commissioner in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552 and § 1.4 of this title, and upon a finding that such action is necessary to the proper conduct of the affairs of the Office, or to carry out the provisions of any Act of Congress, or as provided in sections 56 or 57 of the Act and § 97.19.
( b ) Abandoned applications shall not be open to public inspection. However, if an abandoned application is directly referred to in an issued certificate and is available, it may be inspected or copies obtained by any person on written request, and with written authority received from the applicant. Abandoned applications shall not be returned.
( c ) Decisions of the Commissioner on abandoned applications not otherwise open to public inspection (see paragraph (b) of this section) may be published or made available for publication at the Commissioner's discretion. When it is proposed to release such a decision, the applicant shall be notified directly or through the attorney or agent of record, and a time, not less than 30 days, shall be set for presenting objections.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CR. NO. 2:06cr169-WHA

)

CECILLO PACHACHE; )

DEMETRIOUS TERRELL PEGUES; )

CLIFF JOHNSON; )

TERRENCE ANTWAN NEWKIRK, )

a.k.a. Rock and Rocky; )

CHARLES DANIEL CRAIG; )

KOWOSKY TYWAN CHRISTIAN; )

CHRISTOPHER IMAN ULMER; )

DEMETRIA MILLS; )

DARRYL LAMONT BROWN; )

DARNELL MONTREZE BROWN; )

RODRIGUEZ CHILDRES; )

ROGER WALTON; )

JAMES EARL HUBBARD; )

JAMES CALVIN TALLEY, )

a.k.a. Noosie; )

WILMONT TIMOTHY BARNETT; and )

WILLIAM EARL ULMER, )

a.k.a. Michael Ulmer. )

NOTICE OF BILL OF PARTICULARS

FOR FORFEITURE OF PROPERTY REGARDING

CLIFF JOHNSON, DEMETRIA MILLS AND JAMES CALVIN TALLEY

COMES NOW the United States Attorney's Office for the Middle

District of Alabama, by and through the undersigned Assistant

United States Attorney and hereby files the following Bill of

Particulars:

Through the violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) as alleged in

Count 1; and/or violations of 21 U.S.C. § 841 as alleged in Counts

2 through 13; and/or violations of 21 U.S.C. § 843(b) as alleged in

Counts 14 through 32 of the indictment, which is punishable by

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 159 Filed 03/29/2007 Page 1 of 3
imprisonment of more than one year, the United States seeks

forfeiture of the following property pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853:

One 1965 Chevrolet Impala VIN: 1646950D18229

seized October 19, 2005 from Cliff Johnson;

One 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe VIN:

1GNEC13Z52R236758 seized October 19, 2005 from

Demetria Mills;

Thirty Thousand One Hundred Forty One and

84/100 Dollars ($30,141.84) in United States

currency seized from Mutual Savings Credit

Union account in the name of James C. Talley,

Jr. on April 14, 2006.

 

Respectfully submitted this 29 day of March, 2007. th

FOR THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

 LEURA G. CANARY

 /s/John T. Harmon 

John T. Harmon

Assistant United States Attorney

Office of the United States Attorney

Middle District of Alabama

One Court Square, Suite 201 (36104)

Post Office Box 197

Montgomery, Alabama 36101-0197

Telephone:(334) 223-7280

Facsimile:(334) 223-7560

E-mail: John.Harmon@usdoj.gov

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 159 Filed 03/29/2007 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on March 29, 2007, I electronically

filed the foregoing Bill of Particulars with the Clerk of the Court

using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing

to all counsel of record.

 /s/John T. Harmon 

John T. Harmon

Assistant United States Attorney

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 159 Filed 03/29/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00718-MHT-SRW Document 3 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 1 of 1