alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-35.3
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Commercial Mortgage Servicing
D1086-120, 12th Floor
550 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334


ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated
as of December 1, 2012, by and among Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities,
Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer,
Certificate Administrator, Tax Administrator and Custodian, Midland Loan
Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer,
Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Trust Advisor and U.S. Bank National Association,
as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates WFRBS
2012-C10 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined
shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice
President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

1. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from January 1,
   2013 through December 31, 2013, and of its performance per the Agreement
   during such period has been made under my supervision, and

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer, has
   fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material
   respects throughout the period January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 13th
day of March 2014.


/s/ Daniel Bober
Daniel Bober
Executive Vice President
Wells Fargo Bank


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

(logo) Together we'll go far
G)VEOLIA 

December 17, 2014 

VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL 

United States Environmental Protection Agency 

George T. Czerniak 

Region 5 

77 W. Jackson Boulevard (A-18J) 

Chicago, Illinois 60604-3509 

-DEC 1 9 2014 

Re: Comments ofVeolia ES Technical Solutions, L.L.C. on Draft Air Pollution Control Title 

V Permit 

Dear Mr. Czerniak: 

Enclosed please find the Comments ofVeolia ES Technical Solutions, L.L.C. (Veolia) on the 

United States Environmental Protection Agency's Draft Air Pollution Control Title V Permit to 

Operate Issued to Veolia ("Draft Permit"). 

Veolia appreciates USEPA's willingness to consider Veolia's views and comments with regard 

to the Draft Permit. 

As we have stated to your colleagues on several occasions, V eolia continues to believe the most 

effective way to reduce air emissions is not through the changes contained in the Draft Permit, 

but rather through the installation of additional pollution control equipment. V eolia is committed 

to spending significant resources on enhanced pollution control equipment going well beyond 

that which is required under current regulations, provided the correct approvals are in place and 

we are able to resolve the various open issues concerning our Draft Permit. We would 

appreciate an opportunity to meet with you to further explain and discuss this proposal. 

Veolia believes that, by partnering with the Agency, solutions can be achieved that will allow 

Veolia to continue to provide its vital service to society through the efficient, effective and safe 

incineration of hazardous waste (incineration which is mandated for many forms of hazardous 

waste by USEP A regulations) while also providing assurances that human health and the 

environment are protected. Implementing this proposal would be extremely expensive and would 

represent a heavy financial burden to V eolia. Veolia is willing to incur this fmancial burden in 

order to finalize its Title V permit. 
George T. Czerniak 

December 17, 2014 

Page 2 

DEC 1 9 2014 

V eolia believes that the above proposal is the single best way to reduce emissions still further 

and provide even better protection of human health and the environment, while allowing V eolia 

to remain an active, vibrant and employment-providing participant in the Southern Illinois 

economy. 

Please let me know if such a meeting would be of interest to you; if so, I will call you to arrange 

a meeting with our respective staffs. 

Thank you. 

Very truly yours, 

»,fl-~ Doug Harris 

General Manager 

Veolia ES Technical Solutions, L.L.C.
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 2.1322 Participation and schedule for submissions in an oral hearing. ( a ) Unless otherwise limited by this subpart or by the Commission, participants in an oral hearing may submit and sponsor in the hearings: ( 1 ) Initial written statements of position and written testimony with supporting affidavits on the issues. These materials must be filed on the date set by the Commission or the presiding officer.
( 2 ) ( i ) Written responses and rebuttal testimony with supporting affidavits directed to the initial statements and testimony of other participants;
( ii ) Proposed questions for the Presiding Officer to consider for propounding to persons sponsoring testimony.
( 3 ) These materials must be filed within 20 days of the filing of the materials submitted under paragraph (a)(1) of this section, unless the Commission or Presiding Officer directs otherwise.
( 4 ) Proposed questions directed to rebuttal testimony for the Presiding Officer to consider for propounding to persons offering such testimony shall be filed within 7 days of the filing of the rebuttal testimony.
( b ) The oral hearing should commence within 65 days of the date of the Commission's notice granting a hearing unless the Commission or Presiding Officer directs otherwise. Ordinarily, questioning in the oral hearing will be conducted by the Presiding Officer, using either the Presiding Officer's questions or questions submitted by the participants or a combination of both.
( c ) Written post-hearing statements of position on the issues addressed in the oral hearing may be submitted within 20 days of the close of the oral hearing.
( d ) The Commission, on its own motion, or in response to a request from a Presiding Officer other than the Commission, may use additional procedures, such as direct and cross-examination, or may convene a formal hearing under subpart G of this part on specific and substantial disputes of fact, necessary for the Commission's decision, that cannot be resolved with sufficient accuracy except in a formal hearing. The staff will be a party in any such formal hearing. Neither the Commission nor the Presiding Officer will entertain motions from the parties that request such special procedures or formal hearings.
[63 FR 66730, Dec. 3, 1998, as amended at 69 FR 2271, Jan. 14, 2004]
EXHIBIT 32.3


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 10 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2017 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “report”), I, Jeffrey W. Eckel, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





|   |                                                                                                                      
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.





Date: March 23 , 2018





By:/s/ Jeffrey W. EckelName:  Jeffrey W. EckelTitle:    Chief Executive Officer and President
#### § 20.1801 Security of stored material.

The licensee shall secure from unauthorized removal or access licensed materials that are stored in controlled or unrestricted areas.
Case 1:06-cr-00197-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/15/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:06-cr-00197-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/15/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:06-cr-00197-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/15/2006 Page 3 of 3
§ 1707.103 Definitions. *DNFSB* means the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.
*DNFSB* employee or employee means: ( 1 ) Any current or former officer or employee of DNFSB;
( 2 ) Any contractor or contractor employee working on behalf of the DNFSB or who has performed services for DNFSB; and
( 3 ) Any individual who is serving or has served in any advisory capacity to DNFSB, whether formal or informal.
( 4 ) Provided, that this definition does not include persons who are no longer employed by DNFSB and who are retained or hired as expert witnesses or who agree to testify about general matters, matters available to the public, or matters with which they had no specific involvement or responsibility during their employment with DNFSB.
*Demand* means a subpoena, or an order or other demand of a court or other competent authority, for the production, disclosure, or release of records or for the appearance and testimony of a DNFSB employee that is issued in a legal proceeding.
*General Counsel* means the General Counsel of DNFSB or a person to whom the General Counsel has delegated authority under this part.
*Legal proceeding* means any matter before a court of law, administrative board or tribunal, commission, administrative law judge, hearing officer, or other body that conducts a legal or administrative proceeding. Legal proceeding includes all phases of litigation.
*Records or official records and information mean:* ( 1 ) All documents and materials which are DNFSB agency records under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552;
( 2 ) All other documents and materials contained in DNFSB files; and
( 3 ) All other information or materials acquired by a DNFSB employee in the performance of his or her official duties or because of his or her official status.
*Request* means any formal or informal request, by whatever method, for the production of records and information or for testimony which has not been demanded by a court or other competent authority.
*Testimony* means any written or oral statements, including but not limited to depositions, answers to interrogatories, affidavits, declarations, interviews, and statements made by an individual in connection with a legal proceeding.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600 

 

 NOTICE OF ERROR

To: Counsel of Record

Case Style: Mildred W. Anderson et al v. Pactiv Corporation et al 

Case Number: 2:06-cv-00739-LES

Referenced Docket Entry - ***Proposed Order on Motion - Doc. No.6

The referenced docket entry was filed electronically in ERROR on ***August 17, 2006*** and is

being STRICKEN from the docket. This resulted in an error on the docket sheet because this should

have been filed as an attachment to doc. No. 5.

 

 

 

 

Case 2:06-cv-00739-LES-CSC Document 7 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

 

Case 2:06-cv-00739-LES-CSC Document 7 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 2 of 2
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

CAMELLIA THERAPEUTIC )

FOSTER AGENCY, LLC, etc., )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv735-MHT

) 

THE ALABAMA DEPARTMENT )

OF HUMAN RESOURCES, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

In light of the appearance of counsel for plaintiff,

it is ORDERED that the referral order (doc. no. 22) is

vacated. Counsel are reminded of the deadlines and

obligations in the uniform scheduling order (doc. no.

19), which is still in effect.

DONE, this the 15th day of March, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00735-MHT-CSC Document 31 Filed 03/15/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cv-00746-WHA Document 17 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 34.2 

**Porter Keadle Moore LLC**

CPAs| Advisors| www.pkm.com

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board of Directors 

TransCentra, Inc.: 

We have examined management’s assessment for those customers that management has informed us have requested confirmation of compliance, included inthe accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria (“Management’s Assertion”), that TransCentra, Inc. (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth inItem 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) Regulation AB for services by the Company that are encompassed by contractual obligations to perform Regulation AB reporting (the“Platform”) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013. TransCentra has determined that the remainder of the servicing criteria are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform covered by this report.Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment about the Company’s compliance based on our examination. 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adoptedby the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample basis of theservicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether the Company performed those activities in compliance with the servicing criteria during the specified period and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in thecircumstances. Our procedures were limited to selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backedtransaction in the Platform. Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by theCompany during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for theyear ended December 31, 2013, is fairly stated, in all material respects. 

/s/ Porter Keadle Moore LLC 

February 4, 2014 

235Peachtree Street NE| Suite 1800| Atlanta, Georgia 30303| Phone 404-588-4200| Fax 404-588-4222
EXHIBIT 99.2

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                     OF POLLUTION RESEARCH AND CONTROL CORP.

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and  accompanies  the quarterly  annual report on Form 10-QSB (the "Form
10-QSB") for the quarter ended  September  30, 2002,  of Pollution  Research and
Control Corp. (the "Issuer").

I, Michael  Collins,  the Chief Financial  Officer of the Issuer certify that to
the best of my knowledge:

(i) the Form 10-QSB fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
section  15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 (15  U.S.C.  78m(a)  or
78o(d)); and

(ii) the  information  contained  in the Form  10-QSB  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Issuer.

Dated: November 12, 2002.





/S/ MICHAEL COLLINS
----------------------------
Name: Michael Collins
#### § 15.32 Contracting for collection services.

The NRC may contract for collection services in order to recover delinquent debts only if the debts are not subject to the DCIA requirement to transfer debts to Treasury for debt collection services, e.g. debts that are less than 180 days delinquent. However, the NRC retains the authority to resolve disputes, compromise claims, suspend or terminate collection action, and initiate enforced collection through litigation. When appropriate, the NRC shall contract for collection services in accordance with the guidance and standards contained in 31 CFR chapter IX, parts 900-904.

[67 FR 30320, May 6, 2002]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA OF

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 3:06-cr-204-MEF

)

HENRY ERIK YAPIAS )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the Motion to Continue Sentencing (Doc. #30) and the Motion

for Psychiatric Exam (Doc. #31) filed on January 25, 2007, it is hereby ORDERED:

1. That the motion to continue sentencing is GRANTED. The sentencing hearing set

for February 15, 2007 is continued until further order of the court.

2. That the motion for psychiatric exam is referred to the Magistrate Judge for entry

of any orders or recommendations as may be appropriate.

DONE this the 26 day of January, 2007. th

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cr-00204-MEF-CSC Document 33 Filed 01/26/2007 Page 1 of 1
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 2.1325 Motions and requests. ( a ) Motions and requests shall be addressed to the Presiding Officer, and, if written, also filed with the Secretary and served on other participants.
( b ) Other participants may respond to the motion or request. Responses to written motions or requests shall be filed within 5 days after service unless the Commission or Presiding Officer directs otherwise.
( c ) The Presiding Officer may entertain motions for extension of time and changes in schedule in accordance with paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section.
( d ) When the Commission does not preside, in response to a motion or request, the Presiding Officer may refer a ruling or certify a question to the Commission for decision and notify the participants.
( e ) Unless otherwise ordered by the Commission, a motion or request, or the certification of a question or referral of a ruling, shall not stay or extend any aspect of the hearing.
tdw-ex1011_117.htm



Exhibit 10.11

 

 

Tidewater Inc.

Summary of Director Compensation Arrangements

as of December 31, 2017

 

For service as a non-management director, compensation is as follows:

 


	
 
	
•
	
A base annual retainer of $225,000, 25% of which is paid in cash and 75% of which is paid as time-based restricted stock units (with a 15% decrease in the cash portion effective January 1, 2018);





	
 
	
•
	
An additional annual cash retainer of $50,000 for the chair of the board;





	
 
	
•
	
An additional annual cash retainer of $15,000 for the chair of each of the audit committee and the compensation committee and $5,000 for the chair of the nominating and corporate governance committee;





	
 
	
•
	
Reimbursement of reasonable travel and other out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attendance at meetings of the board of directors and its committees; and





	
 
	
•
	
Participation in the company’s Gift Matching Program under which the company matches a director’s contribution to an educational institution or foundation up to $5,000 per year.




{N1974493.5}
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

Grady Clifford Smith,

Plaintiff,

vs. Civil Action No.:

Hyundai Motor Manufacturing 2:06-cv-745-WKW-CSC

Alabama, LLC,

Defendant.

_____________________________

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE BY T. SCOTT KELLY

COMES NOW T. Scott Kelly and gives notice of his appearance as additional counsel of

record on behalf of Defendant, Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama, LLC (hereinafter “HMMA”

or “Defendant”).

Respectfully submitted,

s/ T. Scott Kelly

T. Scott Kelly (ASB-0345-050K)

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.

One Federal Place, Suite 1000

1819 5

th Avenue North

Birmingham, AL 35203-2118

Telephone: (205) 328-1900

Facsimile: (205) 328-6000

E-mail: Scott.Kelly@odnss.com

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

Case 2:06-cv-00745-WKW-CSC Document 11-2 Filed 11/13/2006 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 13

th

day of November, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing

Notice of Appearance with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send

notification of such filing to the following: Cynthia Forman Wilkinson, Esq.

s/ T. Scott Kelly

T. Scott Kelly (ASB-0345-050K)

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.

One Federal Place, Suite 1000

1819 5

th Avenue North

Birmingham, AL 35203-2118

Telephone: (205) 328-1900

Facsimile: (205) 328-6000

E-mail: Scott.Kelly@odnss.com

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

Case 2:06-cv-00745-WKW-CSC Document 11-2 Filed 11/13/2006 Page 2 of 2
# 632.006 Reduction or suspension of contract payments upon finding of fraud.

**Parent topic:**PART 632—CONTRACT FINANCING