alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 990.41 Appeals under the USDA hemp production plan. ( a ) *Appealing a denied USDA-plan license application.* A license applicant may appeal the denial of a license application. ( 1 ) If the AMS Administrator grants an applicant's appeal of a licensing denial, the applicant will be issued a USDA hemp production license.
( 2 ) If the AMS Administrator denies an appeal, the applicant's license application will be denied. The applicant may request a formal adjudicatory proceeding within 30 days to review the decision. Such proceeding shall be conducted pursuant to the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Rules of Practice Governing Adjudicatory Proceedings, 7 CFR part 1, subpart H.
( b ) *Appealing a denied USDA-plan license renewal.* A producer may appeal the denial of a license renewal. ( 1 ) If the AMS Administrator grants a producer's appeal of a licensing renewal denial, the applicant's USDA hemp production license will be renewed.
( 2 ) If the AMS Administrator denies the appeal, the applicant's license will not be renewed. The denied producer may request a formal adjudicatory proceeding within 30 days to review the decision. Such proceeding shall be conducted pursuant to the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Rules of Practice Governing Formal Adjudicatory Proceedings, 7 CFR part 1, subpart H.
( c ) *Appealing a USDA-plan license termination or suspension.* A USDA hemp plan producer may appeal the revocation or suspension of a license. ( 1 ) If the AMS Administrator grants the appeal of a license termination or suspension, the producer will retain their license.
( 2 ) If the AMS Administrator denies the appeal, the producer's license will be terminated or suspended. The producer may request a formal adjudicatory proceeding within 30 days to review the decision. Such proceeding shall be conducted pursuant to the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Rules of Practice Governing Formal Adjudicatory Proceedings, 7 CFR part 1, subpart H.
( d ) *Filing period.* The appeal of a denied license application, denied license renewal, suspension, or revocation must be filed within the time-period provided in the letter of notification or within 30 business days from receipt of the notification, whichever occurs later. The appeal will be considered “filed” on the date received by the AMS Administrator. The decision to deny an appeal of a license application or renewal, or suspend or terminate a license, is final unless a formal adjudicatory proceeding is requested within 30 days to review the decision. Such proceeding shall be conducted pursuant to the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Rules of Practice Governing Adjudicatory Proceedings, 7 CFR part 1, subpart H.
( e ) *Where to file.* Appeals to the Administrator must be filed in the manner as determined by AMS.
( f ) *What to include.* All appeals must include a copy of the adverse decision and a statement of the appellant's reasons supporting why the decision was not proper or made in accordance with applicable program regulations in this part, policies, or procedures.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Hyman Alpert, Deceased. Jack Alpert, as Executor of William Alpert, Deceased Executor and Trustee of Hyman Alpert, Deceased, et al., Respondents; Gail Alpert Kramer et al., Appellants.

Submitted August 13, 2007;

decided October 23, 2007

Reported below, 37 AD3d 187.

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal as against Joseph and Charles Alpert, dismissed as untimely; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal as against Jack L. Alpert, Lois Katz and Faya Cohen, dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
#### § 110.28 Embargoed destinations.

- Cuba
- Iran
- Iraq
- North Korea
- Syria
- Sudan

[58 FR 13003, Mar. 9, 1993, as amended at 61 FR 35602, July 8, 1996; 65 FR 70291, Nov. 22, 2000; 70 FR 29936, May 25, 2005; 72 FR 1427, Jan. 12, 2007]
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION

CHRISTINE BENNETT, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 1:06cv723-MHT

) 

ARMY FLEET SUPPORT LLC, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the uniform scheduling order is

amended to reflect that the pretrial is reset for

September 14, 2007, with all deadlines in the scheduling

order tied to this date adjusted accordingly.

DONE, this the 21st day of June, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 41 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alvaro Cumberbatch, Appellant.

Submitted November 26, 2007;

decided December 13, 2007

Reported below, 36 AD3d 157.

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Richard M. Greenberg, Esq., Office of the Appellate Defender, 11 Park Place, Suite 1601, New York, NY 10007 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MARCH
31, 1998 FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,709
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   900
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     32,882
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           6,776
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             6,870
<LOANS>                                         85,144
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,080
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 130,970
<DEPOSITS>                                     109,032
<SHORT-TERM>                                     3,847
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,158
<LONG-TERM>                                      1,062
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,500
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,371
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 130,970
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,956
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  582
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    16
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 2,554
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 952
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,017
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,537
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       30
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,033
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    611
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         611
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       410
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .61
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.11
<LOANS-NON>                                         85
<LOANS-PAST>                                        18
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,094
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       52
<RECOVERIES>                                         8
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,080
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,080
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            100
        

</TABLE>
§ 1708.111 Sequestration of witnesses. ( a ) Witnesses shall be sequestered during interviews, or during the taking of testimony, unless otherwise permitted by the Investigating Officer(s) or by the Board, as the case may be.
( b ) No witness, or counsel accompanying any such witness, shall be permitted to be present during the examination of any other witness called in such proceeding, unless permitted by the Investigating Officer(s) or the Board, as the case may be.
#### Alfred Avins, Appellant, v Arthur A. Weeks, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on February 8,1980, unanimously modified, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of denying the motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground of *forum non conveniens*as to defendant Liotti, and otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Plaintiff-appellant and respondent Weeks are nonresidents of this State. The material events underlying this cause of action arose in Delaware, the jurisdiction to which this action has been relegated. In balancing the interests and convenience of all parties, as indeed we must, it is apparent that the action against Weeks was properly dismissed since, as to him, there is no real or substantial nexus with New York. However, Special Term erred in dismissing this action against defendant Liotti. This defendant, a New York resident, was served in New York and yet failed to appear in this action. Under these circumstances it was improper to decline jurisdiction. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Ross, Yesawich and Carro, JJ.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

 EASTERN DIVISION

CLIFFORD ALSTON, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 3:06-cv-722-WKW

)

CHRISTOPHER ASKEW, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

RULE 26(f) ORDER

The parties are hereby reminded of the obligation, imposed by Rule 26(f) of the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure, to confer and to develop a proposed discovery plan. The Rule 26(f)

report containing the discovery plan shall be filed as soon as practicable but not later than

November 2, 2006.

The longstanding practice in this district is that dispositive motions shall be filed no later

than 90 days prior to the pretrial date. If the parties seek to vary from that schedule, they should

present, in the plan, specific case related reasons for the requested variance.

This case will be set for trial before the undersigned judge during one of that judge's

regularly scheduled civil trial terms. The pretrial date is normally set within four to six weeks of

a scheduled trial term. The dates of each judge's civil trial terms are available on the court's

website located at http://almd.uscourts.gov in the civil case information section.

This court may or may not hold a scheduling conference before issuing a scheduling

order. If the court holds a scheduling conference, counsel may participate in the scheduling

conference by conference call.

The scheduling order entered by the court will follow the form of the Uniform Scheduling

Case 3:06-cv-00722-WKW-TFM Document 7 Filed 10/12/2006 Page 1 of 2
Order adopted by the judges of this court. The Uniform Scheduling Order is also available on the

court's website.

The report of the parties should comply with Form 35 of the Appendix of Forms to the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

DONE this12th day of October, 2006.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00722-WKW-TFM Document 7 Filed 10/12/2006 Page 2 of 2
Subpart 334.2 - Earned Value Management

System

Parent topic: PART 334 - MAJOR SYSTEM ACQUISITION

334.201 Policy.

The Department of Health and Human Services applies the earned value management system

requirement as follows:

(a) For cost or incentive contracts and subcontracts valued at $20 million or more, the contractor's

earned value management system shall comply with the guidelines in the American National

Standards Institute/Electronic Industries Alliance Standard 748, Earned Value Management Systems

(ANSI/EIA-748).

(b) For cost or incentive contracts and subcontracts valued at $50 million or more, the contractor

shall have an earned value management system that has been determined by the cognizant Federal

agency to be in compliance with the guidelines in ANSI/EIA-748.

(c) For cost or incentive contracts and subcontracts valued at less than $20 million -

(1) The application of earned value management is optional at the discretion of the program/project

manager and is a risk-based decision that must be supported by a cost/benefit analysis; and

(2) A decision to apply earned value management shall be documented in the contract file.

(d) For firm-fixed-price contracts and subcontracts of any dollar value the application of earned

value management is discouraged.

334.202 Integrated Baseline Reviews (IBRs).

(a) An IBR normally should be conducted as a post-award activity. A pre-award IBR may be

conducted only if -

(1) The acquisition plan contains documentation that demonstrates the need and rationale for a preaward IBR, including an assessment of the impact on the source selection schedule and the expected

benefits;

(2) The use of a pre-award IBR is approved in writing by the head of the contracting activity prior to

the issuance of the solicitation;

(3) The source selection plan and solicitation specifically addresses how the results of a pre-award

IBR will be used during source selection, including any weight to be given to it in source evaluation;

and

(4) Specific arrangements are made, and budget authority is provided, to compensate all offerors

who prepare for or participate in a pre-award IBR; and the solicitation informs prospective offerors

of the means for and conditions of such compensation.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF RESPONSE ONCOLOGY, INC. FOR THE 3 MONTHS PERIOD ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,505
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,896
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,777
<INVENTORY>                                      2,506
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,706
<PP&E>                                          12,996
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,269
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 150,142
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,043
<BONDS>                                         43,511
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         27
<COMMON>                                           120
<OTHER-SE>                                      65,123
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   150,142
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,710
<CGS>                                           15,350
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,079
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    19
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   356
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 570
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,686
<INCOME-TAX>                                       641
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,045
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,045
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3148 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3148

 To suspend temporarily the duty on household one-step, two-step, and 
                       three-step steel ladders.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

 Mr. Chambliss introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on household one-step, two-step, and 
                       three-step steel ladders.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HOUSEHOLD ONE-STEP, TWO-STEP, AND THREE-STEP STEEL LADDERS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.73.26        Household one-step,     Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           two-step, and three-                                              31/2009          ''
                           step steel ladders                                                                  .
                           (provided for in
                           subheading
                           7326.90.85)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# SUBCHAPTER F - SPECIAL CATEGORIES OF CONTRACTING

- PART 334 - MAJOR SYSTEM ACQUISITION 
- PART 335 - RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING 
- PART 336 - CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS 
- PART 337 - SERVICE CONTRACTING - GENERAL 
- PART 339 - ACQUISITION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 

- PART 334 - MAJOR SYSTEM ACQUISITION    - Subpart 334.2 - Earned Value Management System     - 334.201   Policy.
    - 334.202   Integrated Baseline Reviews (IBRs).
- PART 335 - RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING    - 335.070   Cost-sharing.
  - 335.070-1   Policy.
  - 335.070-2   Amount of cost-sharing.
  - 335.070-3   Method of cost-sharing.
  - 335.071   [Reserved]
  - 335.072   Key personnel.
- PART 336 - CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS    - Subpart 336.1 - General     - 336.104   Policy.
  - Subpart 336.5 - Contract Clause     - 336.570   Contract clause.
- PART 337 - SERVICE CONTRACTING - GENERAL    - Subpart 337.1 - Service Contracts - General     - 337.103   Contracting officer responsibility.
- PART 339 - ACQUISITION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY    - Subpart 339.1 - General     - 339.101   Policy
  - Subpart 339.2 - Electronic and Information Technology     - 339.203   Applicability.
    - 339.203-70   Contract clauses for electronic and information technology (EIT) acquisitions.
    - 339.204   Exceptions.
    - 339.204-1   Approval of exceptions.
    - 339.205   Section 508 accessibility standards for contracts.
Case 2:06-cr-00193-MEF-CSC Document 58 Filed 06/01/2007 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00193-MEF-CSC Document 58 Filed 06/01/2007 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00193-MEF-CSC Document 58 Filed 06/01/2007 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00193-MEF-CSC Document 58 Filed 06/01/2007 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00193-MEF-CSC Document 58 Filed 06/01/2007 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00193-MEF-CSC Document 58 Filed 06/01/2007 Page 6 of 6
§ 110.112 Reporter and transcript for an oral hearing. ( a ) A reporter designated by the Commission will record an oral hearing and prepare the official hearing transcript.
( b ) Except for any portions containing classified information, Restricted Data, Safeguards Information, proprietary information, or other sensitive unclassified information, transcripts will be made available at the NRC Web site, *http://www.nrc.gov ,* and/or at the NRC Public Document Room.
( c ) Corrections of the official transcript may be made only as specified by the Secretary.
[43 FR 21641, May 19, 1978, as amended at 64 FR 48955, Sept. 9, 1999; 75 FR 44093, July 28, 2010]
#### MORRIS v. WINDSOR TRUST CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July 10, 1914.)

Action by Robert C. Morris, as trustee, etc., against the Windsor Trust Company.

No opinion. Motion granted. Questions certified. Order filed. For former decision, see 148 N. Y. Supp. 1131.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER, SECTION 906

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Venugopal Rathi, the Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of NF Investment Corp. (the Company), hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  |  | the Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: March 11, 2016/s/ Venugopal RathiVenugopal Rathi
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)




|* | The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Subpart 1449.1 - General Principles

**Parent topic:**PART 1449 - TERMINATION OF CONTRACTS

## 1449.106 Fraud or other criminal conduct.

When fraud or other criminal conduct is suspected, the CO will submit a report documenting the incident to the BPC for transmittal to the OIG. Informational copies will be forwarded to the HCA and the Director, PAM.   

## 1449.107 Audit of prime contract settlement proposals and subcontract settlements.

Requests for audits pursuant to FAR 49.107 shall be sent to the Assistant Inspector General for Auditing, in accordance with the procedures in 360 DM 2.3.   

## 1449.111 Review of proposed settlements.

All proposed settlement agreements shall be reviewed by the SOL and approved at one level above the CO. Settlement agreements of $250,000 or more shall be approved by the BPC.
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 3 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 3 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 2 of 2
2401.000 Scope of part.

This part describes the method by which the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)

implements, supplements and deviates from the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) through the

establishment of the HUD Acquisition Regulation (HUDAR), which prescribes the Department's

procurement policies and procedures under the FAR System.

Parent topic: PART 2401 - FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION SYSTEM