alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
10.17


 


OMEGA
FLEX, INC.


Phantom
Stock Agreements


Schedule
of Directors and Officers


As
of December 31, 2017


 


	Director/Officer	 	Type	 	Number	 	 	Grant Date	 	Grant Price	 	 	Maturity Date	 	Vesting Schedule	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Dean W. Rivest	 	Full	 	 	1,800	 	 	02/19/2014	 	$	20.20	 	 	02/19/2018	 	 	3 years	 
	 	 	Full	 	 	1,800	 	 	02/16/2015	 	$	31.26	 	 	02/16/2019	 	 	3 years	 
	 	 	Full	 	 	1,800	 	 	02/16/2016	 	$	33.02	 	 	02/16/2020	 	 	3 years	 
	 	 	Full	 	 	1,200	 	 	02/14/2017	 	$	44.23	 	 	02/14/2021	 	 	3 years	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Paul J. Kane	 	Full	 	 	1,800	 	 	02/19/2014	 	$	20.20	 	 	02/19/2018	 	 	3 years	 
	 	 	Full	 	 	1,800	 	 	02/16/2015	 	$	31.26	 	 	02/16/2019	 	 	3 years	 
	 	 	Full	 	 	1,800	 	 	02/16/2016	 	$	33.02	 	 	02/16/2020	 	 	3 years	 
	 	 	Full	 	 	1,200	 	 	02/14/2017	 	$	44.23	 	 	02/14/2021	 	 	3 years	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Edwin B. Moran	 	Full	 	 	1,800	 	 	02/19/2014	 	$	20.20	 	 	02/19/2018	 	 	3 years	 
	 	 	Full	 	 	1,800	 	 	02/16/2015	 	$	31.26	 	 	02/16/2019	 	 	3 years	 
	 	 	Full	 	 	1,800	 	 	02/16/2016	 	$	33.02	 	 	02/16/2020	 	 	3 years	 
	 	 	Full	 	 	1,200	 	 	02/14/2017	 	$	44.23	 	 	02/14/2021	 	 	3 years	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Steven A. Treichel	 	Full	 	 	2,550	 	 	02/19/2014	 	$	20.20	 	 	02/19/2018	 	 	3 years	 
	 	 	Full	 	 	2,550	 	 	02/16/2015	 	$	31.26	 	 	02/16/2019	 	 	3 years	 
	 	 	Full	 	 	2,550	 	 	02/16/2016	 	$	33.02	 	 	02/16/2020	 	 	3 years	 
	 	 	Full	 	 	2,000	 	 	02/14/2017	 	$	44.23	 	 	02/14/2021	 	 	3 years	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Timothy P. Scanlan	 	Full	 	 	1,800	 	 	02/19/2014	 	$	20.20	 	 	02/19/2018	 	 	3 years	 
	 	 	Full	 	 	1,800	 	 	02/16/2015	 	$	31.26	 	 	02/16/2019	 	 	3 years	 
	 	 	Full	 	 	1,800	 	 	02/16/2016	 	$	33.02	 	 	02/16/2020	 	 	3 years	 
	 	 	Full	 	 	1,200	 	 	02/14/2017	 	$	44.23	 	 	02/14/2021	 	 	3 years	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Steven Hockenberry	 	Full	 	 	710	 	 	02/19/2014	 	$	20.20	 	 	02/19/2018	 	 	3 years	 
	 	 	Full	 	 	710	 	 	02/16/2015	 	$	31.26	 	 	02/16/2019	 	 	3 years	 
	 	 	Full	 	 	710	 	 	02/16/2016	 	$	33.02	 	 	02/16/2020	 	 	3 years	 
	 	 	Full	 	 	475	 	 	02/14/2017	 	$	44.23	 	 	02/14/2021	 	 	3 years	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Robert Haines	 	Full	 	 	475	 	 	02/14/2017	 	$	44.23	 	 	02/14/2021	 	 	3 years
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1542
ULISSES M. BASTOS, Petitioner, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A28-326-230) Submitted: January 25, 2006 Decided: February 13, 2006 Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Antonio M. Zaldana, LAW OFFICE OF ANTONIO M. ZALDANA, Los Angeles, California, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Jeffrey J. Bernstein, Senior Litigation Counsel, John E. Cunningham, III, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Ulisses M. Bastos, a native and citizen of Brazil, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reopen and remand to the immigration judge to apply for asylum based upon changed circumstances. We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion. See INS v. Doherty , 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
#### § 1021.101 Policy.

It is DOE's policy to follow the letter and spirit of NEPA; comply fully with the CEQ Regulations; and apply the NEPA review process early in the planning stages for DOE proposals.
Subpart 417.2 - Options

Parent topic: PART 417 - SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS

417.204 Contracts.

The head of the contracting activity is authorized to approve contracts which exceed the 5 year

limitation in FAR 17.204(e).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

EASTERN DIVISION 

JAMES TYRON EDWARDS, ) 

 #244 859 ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Civil Action No. 3:06-CV-740-MHT-SRW 

 ) 

SGT. MOORE, et al. ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

 COME NOW Sheriff Thomas F. Boswell, Chief Deputy William Alexander, Lt Loetta 

Holland, Sgt Samuel Pierce Moore, and Sgt Danny Bussey, Defendants in the above-styled 

cause, and move this Honorable Court for an extension of time of twenty-one (21) days in which 

to file Defendants’ Special Report. In support of this motion, Defendants show unto the Court 

the following:

1. On October 3, 2006, this Court entered an Order directing the Defendants to file a 

Special Report on or before November 14, 2006. 

 2. As ordered by this Court, the attorney for Defendants has been unsuccessful in 

conferring with the Plaintiff before the filing of the Special Report, as the current location of the 

Plaintiff has not been determined. 

 3. The gathering of information with which to formulate the Special Report has 

taken longer than expected, and due to the federal holiday on November 10, 2006, said attorney 

Case 3:06-cv-00740-MHT-SRW Document 16 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 1 of 3
2

has been unable to obtain the affidavits and evidence from the defendants and witnesses at the 

Russell County Jail to be used in support of the Special Report. 

 4. Defendants are in need of this additional time to respond and to fully comply with 

this Court’s Order in preparing the Special Report. 

 5. Defendants have not previously requested an extension of time in this case. 

6. Plaintiff will not be prejudiced by the requested extension. 

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Defendants respectfully request this 

Honorable Court grant their Motion for Extension of Time to file this Special Report up to and 

including December 5, 2006. 

 Respectfully submitted this 9th day of November, 2006.

 s/Winthrop E. Johnson 

WINTHROP E. JOHNSON, Bar No. JOH086 

Attorney for Defendants 

WEBB & ELEY, P.C. 

7475 Halcyon Pointe Drive (36117) 

Post Office Box 240909 

Montgomery, Alabama 36124 

Telephone: (334) 262-1850 

Fax: (334) 262-1889 

E-mail: ccornelius@webbeley.com 

Case 3:06-cv-00740-MHT-SRW Document 16 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that on this the 9th day of November, 2006, I have electronically filed the 

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, and that I have mailed a true 

and correct copy of the foregoing by United States Mail, postage prepaid, to the following nonCM/ECF participant: 

James Tyrone Edwards, Jr. 

Russell County Jail/# 244 889 

P.O. Box 640 

Phenix City, Alabama 36868-0640 

Please forward to Mr. Edwards’ new address. 

s/Winthrop E. Johnson 

Case 3:06-cv-00740-MHT-SRW Document 16 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                        742,293
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 32,783
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              0
<PP&E>                        8,933,000                       <F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                10,043,021
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         0
<BONDS>                       6,096,326                       <F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      1,250,173                       <F3>
<OTHER-SE>                    0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  0
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              912,752                         <F4>
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 608,149                         <F5>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            314,526
<INCOME-PRETAX>               0
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           0
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (12,175)
<EPS-BASIC>                 0
<EPS-DILUTED>                 0

<FN>
<F1>   "PP&E" REPRESENTS REAL ESTATE HELD FOR SALE
<F2>   "BONDS" REPRESENTS MORTGAGE PAYABLE
<F3>   "COMMON" REPRESENTS NET ASSETS IN LIQUIDATION
<F4>   "TOTAL REVENUES" REPRESENTS RENTAL, INTEREST, AND OTHER
         INCOME
<F5>   "TOTAL COSTS" REPRESENTS TOTAL EXPENSES LESS INTEREST
EXPENSE
</FN>


</TABLE>
Case 2:06-cr-00198-WKW-CSC Document 13 Filed 08/03/2006 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>   1
            THE MANUFACTURERS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


     I, David Libbey, Vice President, Finance of The Manufacturers Life
Insurance Company of North America (the "Company") do hereby constitute and
appoint John D. DesPrez III, James. D. Gallagher, Richard C. Hirtle, Hugh
McHaffie and John G. Vyrsen, or any one of them, my true and lawful attorneys to
sign or execute (i) registration statements and reports and other filings to be
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended (the "1933 Act") and/or the Investment Company Act of
1940, as amended (the "1940 Act") and (ii) reports and other filings to be filed
with the SEC (or any other regulatory entity) pursuant to the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the "1934 Act") and to do any and all acts and things and
to sign or execute any and all instruments for me, in my name, in the capacities
indicated below, which said attorney, may deem necessary or advisable to enable
the Company to comply with the 1933 Act, the 1940 Act and the 1934 Act, and any
rules, regulations and requirements of the SEC, in connection with such
registration statements, reports and filings made under the 1933 Act, the 1940
Act and the 1934 Act, including specifically, but without limitation, power and
authority to sign or execute for me, in my name, and in the capacities indicated
below, (i) any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments) to such
registration statements and (ii) Form 10-Ks and Form 10-Qs filed under the 1934
Act; and I do hereby ratify and confirm all that the said attorneys, or any of
them, shall do or cause to be done by virtue of this power of attorney.


Dated as of this 1st day of September, 1997.


Signature                                Title
---------                                -----


/s/ David Libbey
------------------------            Vice President, Finance
David Libbey                        (Principal Financial Officer)
ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

April 19, 2024

CR-2023-0375

Markeith Dynard Jefferson v. State of Alabama (Appeal from Jefferson Circuit 

Court: CC-20-2129) 

NOTICE 

You are hereby notified that on April 19, 2024, the following action was taken 

in the above-referenced cause by the Court of Criminal Appeals:

Application for Rehearing Overruled.

D. Scott Mitchell, Clerk
Order entered November 8, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-17-01064-CV

SM ARCHITECTS, PLLC AND R OGER STEPHENS, Appellants

V.

AMX VETERAN SPECIALTY SERVICES, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 116th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-11230



### ORDER

Before us is appellee’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdict ion. The same issues and

arguments presented in appellee’s motion were presented in the briefs on appeal and addressed in

this Court’s opinion issued this same date. Because the issues presented in the motion were

resolved in the appeal, appellee’s motion is DENIED AS MOOT

.

/s/ MOLLY FRANCIS JUSTICE
#### In the Matter of Vincent Vitolo, Appellant, v Elaine Vitolo, Respondent.

— In a proceeding pursuant to article 4 of the Family Court Act, the petitioner husband appeals from so much of an order of the Family Court, Rockland County, dated April 18, 1979, as, after a hearing, directed him to pay the sum of $75 per week as alimony to his former wife. Order modified, on the law, by reducing the alimony award to $50 per week. As so modified, order affirmed, insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The Family Court found that the respondent wife requires at least $600 per month to meet her needs, and that her monthly income is $433. In view of these findings, the court’s alimony award of $75 per week was excessive. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Martuscello and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 51 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 1 of 15
Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 51 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 2 of 15
Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 51 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 3 of 15
Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 51 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 4 of 15
Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 51 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 5 of 15
Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 51 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 6 of 15
Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 51 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 7 of 15
Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 51 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 8 of 15
Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 51 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 9 of 15
Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 51 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 10 of 15
Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 51 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 11 of 15
Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 51 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 12 of 15
Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 51 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 13 of 15
Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 51 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 14 of 15
Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 51 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 15 of 15
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Buckingham Exploration Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Dated: September 14, 2010





/s/Christopher Robin Relph


Christopher Robin Relph


Chief Executive Officer and


Chief Financial Officer
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-19-00107-CR 

SCOTTY D. JUSTICE, APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

 

On Appeal from the 137th District Court 

Lubbock County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 2010-427,049 (Counts I, II, & III), 

Honorable John J. “Trey” McClendon III, Presiding 

 

September 11, 2019 

 

ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND 

 

Before CAMPBELL and PIRTLE and PARKER, JJ. 

Appellant Scotty D. Justice appeals his convictions of two counts of aggravated 

sexual assault1 and one count of aggravated assault.

2

 The convictions were enhanced 

by prior felony convictions. The trial court sentenced appellant to seventy-five years’ 

1 TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.021 (West 2019).

2 TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.02 (West 2019).
2

confinement for each count of aggravated sexual assault and to ninety-nine years’

confinement for aggravated assault. The sentences run concurrently.

The appellate record was originally due on May 28, 2019. The clerk’s record was 

filed by this date. However, the court reporter, Ms. Breann Hays, notified the court on 

May 28 that she was unable to complete the reporter’s record by the deadline due to her 

case load. Accordingly, we granted Ms. Hays a thirty-day extension to file the reporter’s 

record. We subsequently granted her two more thirty-day extensions. By letter of July 

31, 2019, we admonished Ms. Hays that no further extensions would be granted and that 

failure to file the reporter’s record by August 28 would result in the appeal being abated 

and the cause remanded to the trial court without further notice. On September 3, 2019, 

Ms. Hays filed a fourth request for a thirty-day extension due to her case load.

We deny the request, abate the appeal, and remand the cause to the trial court for 

further proceedings. TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c), 37.3(a)(2). On remand, the trial court shall 

use whatever means it finds necessary to determine the following:

(1) what tasks remain to complete the filing of the reporter’s record;

(2) why Ms. Hays has not completed the necessary tasks;

(3) what amount of time is reasonably necessary for the completion of those 

tasks; and

(4) whether Ms. Hays can complete the tasks within the time the trial court finds 

reasonable.

Should the trial court determine that Ms. Hays will require more than thirty days to 

complete, certify, and file the reporter’s record, it shall arrange for a substitute reporter to 

do so. We further direct the trial court to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law 
3

addressing the foregoing subjects and any orders it finds necessary. The trial court shall 

cause its findings, conclusions, and any orders to be included in a supplemental clerk’s 

record to be filed with the clerk of this court by October 11, 2019. If, before that date, Ms. 

Hays completes the filing of the reporter’s record, the trial court may report that fact to the 

clerk of this court in lieu of a supplemental clerk’s record.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
#### Geidy Mayorga, Appellant, v Jocarl & Ron Co., Respondent.

Submitted November 26, 2007;

decided December 13, 2007

Reported below, 41 AD3d 132.

Motion to dismiss the appeal herein granted and appeal dismissed, with $400 costs and $100 costs of motion, upon the ground that the two-Justice dissent at the Appellate Division is not on a question of law *(see*CPLR 5601 [a]).
Order entered January 13, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01445-CV

MONTGOMERY J. BENNETT, Appellant

V.

MATTHEW ZUCKER, Appellee

On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-19-17721

ORDER

The notice of appeal recites the final judgment, the order affirming Associate Judge 

Danielle Diaz’s granting of defendant’s plea to the jurisdiction, was signed November 13, 2019.

The clerk’s record, however, does not contain a copy of the judgment. Accordingly, we

ORDER Dallas County District Clerk Felicia Pitre to file, no later than January 23, 2020, either 

a supplemental clerk’s record containing a copy of the judgment or written verification no 

judgment exists or it cannot be located.

We SUSPEND the deadline for filing appellant’s brief on the merits until further order of 

the Court. We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Pitre and the 

parties.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL 

JUSTICE
Subpart 2416.3 - Cost-Reimbursement

Contracts

Parent topic: PART 2416 - TYPES OF CONTRACTS

2416.307 Contract clauses.

(a) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 2452.216-79, Estimated Cost (No Fee), in all

cost-reimbursement (no fee) type solicitations and contracts.

(b) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 2452.216-80, Estimated Cost and Fixed-Fee, in

all cost-plus-fixed fee type solicitations and contracts.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-11005

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Bernice Lee Woodson, Jr., 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:20-CR-32-13

Before Jolly, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Bernice Lee Woodson, Jr., has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 

(5th Cir. 2011). Woodson’s construed motion for leave to file an out-of-time 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 15, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-11005 Document: 00516472950 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/15/2022
No. 21-11005

2

response is GRANTED. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant 

portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Woodson’s response. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to 

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Woodson’s motion for the appointment of new counsel is DENIED as 

untimely. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998). 

Case: 21-11005 Document: 00516472950 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/15/2022
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,391,614
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,173,114
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,347,271
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,708,378<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        3,239,795
<PREFERRED>                                  1,548,000
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,347,271
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            26,216,237
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               25,046,017
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               924,011
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                246,209
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            246,209
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   210,412
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.09)
<FN>
<F1>Unclassified balance sheet
</FN>
        

</TABLE>