alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### VALENTINE, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

July 24, 1906.)

Action by Catharine L. Valentine against the city of New York.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
§ 1022.5 Applicability. ( a ) This part applies to all organizational units of DOE, including the National Nuclear Security Administration, except that it shall not apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
( b ) This part applies to all proposed floodplain or wetland actions, including those sponsored jointly with other agencies.
( c ) This part does not apply to the issuance by DOE of permits, licenses, or allocations to private parties for activities involving a wetland that are located on non-Federal property.
( d ) Subject to paragraph (e) of this section, subpart B of this part does not apply to: ( 1 ) Routine maintenance of existing facilities and structures on DOE property in a floodplain or wetland. Maintenance is routine when it is needed to maintain and preserve the facility or structure for its designated purpose (*e.g.,* activities such as reroofing, plumbing repair, door and window replacement);
( 2 ) Site characterization, environmental monitoring, or environmental research activities (*e.g.,* sampling and surveying water and air quality, flora and fauna abundance, and soil properties) in a floodplain or wetland, unless these activities would involve building any structure; involve draining, dredging, channelizing, filling, diking, impounding, or related activities; or result in long-term change to the ecosystem; and
( 3 ) Minor modification (*e.g.,* upgrading lighting, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems; installing or improving alarm and surveillance systems; and adding environmental monitoring or control systems) of an existing facility or structure in a floodplain or wetland to improve safety or environmental conditions unless the modification would result in a significant change in the expected useful life of the facility or structure, or involve building any structure or involve draining, dredging, channelizing, filling, diking, impounding, or related activities.
( e ) Although the actions listed in paragraphs (d)(1), (d)(2), and (d)(3) of this section normally have very small or no adverse impact on a floodplain or wetland, where unusual circumstances indicate the possibility of adverse impact on a floodplain or wetland, DOE shall determine the need for a floodplain or wetland assessment.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 (the Report) of The Peoples BancTrust Company, Inc.
(the Company), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby each certify that to the best of our knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered
in the Report.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Elam P. Holley, Jr.                             
|Elam P. Holley, Jr.                                 
|President and Chief Executive Officer               
|                                                    
|/s/ Andrew C. Bearden, Jr.                          
|Andrew C. Bearden, Jr.                              
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                                                    
|May 9, 2005                                         
|(Date)                                              



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The information furnished herein shall not be
deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.
615.604 Agency points of contact.       (a)(4) The contact points for unsolicited proposals are the heads of the contracting activities.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 615.6—Unsolicited Proposals
#### § 984.84 Personal liability.

No member or alternate of the Board, nor any employee or agent thereof shall be held personally responsible either individually or jointly with others, in any way whatsoever, to any handler or any person for errors in judgment, mistakes, or other acts either of commission or omission, as such member, alternate employee or agent, except for acts of dishonesty.

[39 FR 35332, Oct. 1, 1974, as amended at 41 FR 31545, July 29, 1976]
S. 264

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the fourth day of January, two thousand and five

An Act

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities

Act to authorize certain projects in the State of Hawaii.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hawaii Water Resources Act

of 2005’’.

SEC. 2. HAWAII RECLAMATION PROJECTS.

(a) IN GENERAL.—The Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities Act (43 U.S.C. 390h et seq.) is amended—

(1) by redesignating the second section 1636 (as added

by section 1(b) of Public Law 108–316 (118 Stat. 1202)) as

section 1637; and

(2) by adding at the end the following:

‘‘SEC. 1638. HAWAII RECLAMATION PROJECTS.

‘‘(a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary may—

‘‘(1) in cooperation with the Board of Water Supply, City

and County of Honolulu, Hawaii, participate in the design,

planning, and construction of a project in Kalaeloa, Hawaii,

to desalinate and distribute seawater for direct potable use

within the service area of the Board;

‘‘(2) in cooperation with the County of Hawaii Department

of Environmental Management, Hawaii, participate in the

design, planning, and construction of facilities in Kealakehe,

Hawaii, for the treatment and distribution of recycled water

and for environmental purposes within the County; and

‘‘(3) in cooperation with the County of Maui Wastewater

Reclamation Division, Hawaii, participate in the design, planning, and construction of, and acquire land for, facilities in

Lahaina, Hawaii, for the distribution of recycled water from

the Lahaina Wastewater Reclamation Facility for non-potable

uses within the County.

‘‘(b) COST SHARE.—The Federal share of the cost of a project

described in subsection (a) shall not exceed 25 percent of the total

cost of the project.

‘‘(c) LIMITATION.—Funds provided by the Secretary shall not

be used for the operation and maintenance of a project described

in subsection (a).

‘‘(d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There are authorized

to be appropriated such sums as are necessary to carry out this

section.’’.
S. 264—2

(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of sections in section

2 of the Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act

of 1992 (43 U.S.C. prec. 371) is amended by striking the item

relating to the second section 1636 (as added by section 2 of Public

Law 108–316 (118 Stat. 1202)) and inserting the following:

‘‘Sec. 1637. Williamson County, Texas, Water Recycling and Reuse Project.

‘‘Sec. 1638. Hawaii reclamation projects.’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
----

| 1. | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:    5/12/09    | /s/Thomas K. Derbyshire        |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------|--------|
|                                              | Thomas K. Derbyshire           |
|                                              | Vice President, Treasurer, and |
|                                              | Principal Financial Officer    |

----
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 226

Honoring the life and legacy of Robert ‘‘Fighting Bob’’ La Follette, Sr. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 21, 2005

Ms. BALDWIN (for herself, Mr. OBEY, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. PETRI, Mr. 

KIND, Mr. GREEN of Wisconsin, Ms. MOORE of Wisconsin, and Mr. 

RYAN of Wisconsin) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION

Honoring the life and legacy of Robert ‘‘Fighting Bob’’ La 

Follette, Sr.

Whereas Robert Marion La Follette, Sr., commonly known as 

‘‘Fighting Bob’’ La Follette, was born on June 14, 1855, 

in Primrose, Wisconsin; 

Whereas ‘‘Fighting Bob’’ La Follette served 3 terms in the 

United States House of Representatives, 4 terms in the 

United States Senate, and 3 terms as the Governor of 

Wisconsin; 

Whereas ‘‘Fighting Bob’’ La Follette supported farmers and 

the working person, opposed political machines and corrupt corporations, and believed that a strong democracy 

requires a fair distribution of wealth and power; 
2

•HRES 226 IH 

Whereas ‘‘Fighting Bob’’ La Follette believed that government can bring about social and political progress for the 

greater good; 

Whereas ‘‘Fighting Bob’’ La Follette believed in the ‘‘Wisconsin Idea’’ (the notion that the government should collaborate with the University of Wisconsin to addess serious social and economic problems), and in a government 

infused with the talent of trained professionals, guided by 

the expertise of wise scholars, and answerable to an active and well-educated citizenry; 

Whereas ‘‘Fighting Bob’’ La Follette applied the ‘‘Wisconsin 

Idea’’ to bring about major reforms in banking and railroad regulation, the environment, transportation, civil 

service, and taxation; 

Whereas ‘‘Fighting Bob’’ La Follette promoted populist 

issues, such as public disclosure of campaign contributions, equitable graduated taxes, and direct primary elections, and encouraged the establishment of both the Department of Labor and the Federal Trade Commission; 

Whereas ‘‘Fighting Bob’’ La Follette sought to rid government of corruption at all levels and spearheaded a major 

investigation into the infamous Teapot Dome scandal; 

Whereas ‘‘Fighting Bob’’ La Follette, with his wife Belle 

Case La Follette, whom he regarded as an equal partner 

in life, supported women’s suffrage and advocated civil 

rights legislation for ethnic and racial minorities; 

Whereas ‘‘Fighting Bob’’ La Follette, as an important leader 

in the Progressive movement, brought about a truer democracy; and 
3

•HRES 226 IH 

Whereas the year 2005 marks the 150th anniversary of the 

birth of ‘‘Fighting Bob’’ La Follette: Now, therefore, be 

it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors 

2 the life and legacy of Robert ‘‘Fighting Bob’’ La Follette, 

3 Sr.

Æ
260 Interstate North Circle, SE

Atlanta, GA 30339

T 770.763-4000

www.assurant.com

 

January 31, 2023

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH §1122 (d)(2)(vi), §1122(d)(4)(xi) and §1122(d)(4)(xii) of REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA FOR THE REPORTING PERIOD JANUARY 1, 2022 TO DECEMBER 31, 2022

American Security Insurance Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company and TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc. (collectively, the "Asserting Party") is responsible for assessing compliance for the period of January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021 (the "Reporting Period") with the servicing criteria set forth in §1122(d)(2)(vi), §1122(d)(4)(xi) and §1122(d)(4)(xii) of Title 17, §229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations, (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria") which the Asserting Party has concluded are applicable to the insurance escrow servicing activities it performs with respect to all mortgage backed securities transactions that were registered after January 1, 2006 with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Platform Transactions"). The Asserting Party used the criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess the compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform Transaction.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Reporting Period.

American Security Insurance Company Standard Guaranty Insurance Company TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc.

 

/s/ Michael Campbell			

By: Michael Campbell

----

 

President of American Security Insurance Company0

And Standard Guaranty Insurance Company, and

Sr. Vice President of TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc.

Date: January 31, 2023					

----
§ 1021.311 Notice of intent and scoping. ( a ) DOE shall publish an NOI in the Federal Register in accordance with 40 CFR 1501.7 and containing the elements specified in 40 CFR 1508.22 as soon as practicable after a decision is made to prepare an EIS. However, if there will be a lengthy period of time between its decision to prepare an EIS and the time of actual preparation, DOE may defer publication of the NOI until a reasonable time before preparing the EIS, provided that DOE allows a reasonable opportunity for interested parties to participate in the EIS process. Through the NOI, DOE shall invite comments and suggestions on the scope of the EIS. DOE shall disseminate the NOI in accordance with 40 CFR 1506.6.
( b ) If there will be a lengthy delay between the time DOE has decided to prepare an EIS and the beginning of the public scoping process, DOE may publish an Advance NOI in the Federal Register to provide an early opportunity to inform interested parties of the pending EIS or to solicit early public comments. This Advance NOI does not serve as a substitute for the NOI provided for in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) Publication of the NOI in the Federal Register shall begin the public scoping process. The public scoping process for a DOE EIS shall allow a minimum of 30 days for the receipt of public comments.
( d ) DOE shall hold at least one public scoping meeting as part of the public scoping process for a DOE EIS. DOE shall announce the location, date, and time of public scoping meetings in the NOI or by other appropriate means, such as additional notices in the Federal Register, news releases to the local media, or letters to affected parties. Public scoping meetings shall not be held until at least 15 days after public notification. Should DOE change the location, date, or time of a public scoping meeting, or schedule additional public scoping meetings, DOE shall publicize these changes in the Federal Register or in other ways as appropriate.
( e ) In determining the scope of the EIS, DOE shall consider all comments received during the announced comment period held as part of the public scoping process. DOE may also consider comments received after the close of the announced comment period.
( f ) A public scoping process is optional for DOE supplemental EISs (40 CFR 1502.9(c)(4)). If DOE initiates a public scoping process for a supplemental EIS, the provisions of paragraphs (a) through (e) of this section shall apply.
[57 FR 15144, Apr. 24, 1992, as amended at 61 FR 36239, July 9, 1996; 76 FR 63787, Oct. 13, 2011]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,311,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,311,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,311,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          330,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    12,737,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (11,756,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,311,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  160,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (158,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (158,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (158,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)
        

</TABLE>
#### Rose Paternostro, Respondent, v. Salvatore Schillaci, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries incurred by .plaintiff while a passenger in a motor vehicle owned and operated by appellant, the appeal is from an order of the ¡Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated October 9, 1968, which (1) granted plaintiff’s motion to set aside a jury verdict in favor of appellant upon a trial of the issues of liability only and to direct a verdict in favor of plaintiff on those issues and (2) set the ease down for an assessment of damages. Order reversed, with costs, plaintiff’s motion demed and jury verdict reinstated. No claim is made that errors of law occurred at the trial or that prejudicial conduct improperly influenced the verdict. Under these circumstances, and .on the proof adduced, which indicated an issue of fact as to the negligence of appellant, it may not be held that the evidence preponderates so greatly in favor of plaintiff as to establish ttiaf the jury's verdict for appellant “could not have .been reached upon any fair interpretation of the evidence” *(Olsen*v. *Chase Manhattan Bank,*10 A D 2d 539, 544; *Herman*v. *Hubert,*12 A D 2d 767). Beldock, P. J., Christ, Rabin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur. •
#### § 983.64 Reports.

Upon the request of the committee, with the approval of the Secretary, each handler shall furnish such reports and information on such forms as are needed to enable the Secretary and the committee to perform their functions and enforce the regulations under this part. The committee shall provide a uniform report format for the handlers.

[69 FR 17850, Apr. 4, 2004. Redesignated at 74 FR 56541, Nov. 2, 2009]
Subpart 309.4 - Debarment, Suspension, and Ineligibility    **Parent topic:** PART 309 - CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS309.403 Definitions.       The following definition applies to this subpart:          *The HHS Suspension and Debarment Official* is the Deputy Assistant Secretary (DAS) for the Office of Grants and Acquisition Policy and Accountability (OGAPA).309.404 System for Award Management (SAM) exclusions.       (c) For actions made by HHS pursuant to FAR 9.406 and 9.407, the Office of Recipient Integrity Coordination shall perform the actions required by FAR 9.404(c).309.405 Effect of listing (compelling reason determinations).       (a) The head of the contracting activity (HCA) (non-delegable) may, with the written concurrence of the Suspension and Debarment Official, make the determinations referenced in FAR 9.405(a) regarding contracts.          (1) If a contracting officer considers it necessary to award a contract, or consent to a subcontract with a debarred or suspended contractor, the contracting officer shall prepare a determination, including all pertinent documentation, and submit it through appropriate acquisition channels to the HCA. The documentation shall include the date by which approval is required and a compelling reason for the proposed action. Compelling reasons for award of a contract or consent to a subcontract with a debarred or suspended contractor include the following:          (i) Only the cited contractor can provide the property or services, and          (ii) The urgency of the requirement dictates that HHS conduct business with the cited contractor.          (2) If the HCA decides to approve the requested action, the HCA shall request the concurrence of the Suspension and Debarment Official and, if given, shall inform the contracting officer in writing of the determination within the required time period.309.406 Debarment.309.406-3 Procedures.       Refer all matters appropriate for consideration by an agency Suspension and Debarment Official as soon as practicable to the appropriate Suspension and Debarment Official identified in 309.403. Any person may refer a matter to the Suspension and Debarment Official.309.407 Suspension.309.407-3 Procedures.       Refer all matters appropriate for consideration by an agency Suspension and Debarment Official as soon as practicable to the appropriate Suspension and Debarment Official identified in 309.403. Any person may refer a matter to the Suspension and Debarment Official.309.470 Reporting of suspected causes for debarment or suspension or the taking of evasive actions.309.470-1 Situations where reports are required.       The contracting officer shall report to the HCA and the Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary - Acquisition whenever the contracting officer -          (a) Knows or suspects that a contractor is committing or has committed any of the acts described in FAR 9.406-2 or 9.407-2; or          (b) Suspects a contractor is attempting to evade the prohibitions of debarment or suspension imposed under FAR 9.405, or any other comparable regulation, by changes of address, multiple addresses, formation of new companies, or by other devices.