alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 78 FR 34247, June 7, 2013.

§ 1.29 Office of International Programs. The Office of International Programs— ( a ) Advises the Chairman, the Commission, and NRC staff on international issues;
( b ) Recommends policies concerning nuclear exports and imports, international safeguards, international physical security, nonproliferation matters, and international cooperation and assistance in nuclear safety and radiation protection;
( c ) Plans, develops, and manages international nuclear safety information exchange programs and coordinates international research agreements;
( d ) Obtains, evaluates, and uses pertinent information from other NRC and U.S. Government offices in processing nuclear export and import license applications;
( e ) Establishes and maintains working relationships with individual countries and international nuclear organizations, as well as other involved U.S. Government agencies; and
( f ) Assures that all international activities carried out by the Commission and staff are well coordinated internally and Government-wide and are consistent with NRC and U.S. policies.
[57 FR 1639, Jan. 15, 1992]
2448.102 Policies.

(a) The authority of the agency head to exempt contracts from including Value Engineering (VE)

procedures and processes under 48 CFR 48.102(a) is delegated to the HCA for individual (case-bycase) exemptions and to the Senior Procurement Executive for class exemptions.

(b) The Senior Procurement Executive is responsible for managing and monitoring HUD's VE efforts.

Parent topic: PART 2448 - VALUE ENGINEERING
###### Editorial Note on Part 1045

#### Editorial Notes:Nomenclature changes to part 1045 appear at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023, and 88 FR 82238, Nov. 24, 2023.

§ 1045.20 How does an agency request an exemption or equivalency to meet a provision in this part?

Editorial Notes:

Nomenclature changes to part 1045 appear at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023, and 88 FR 82238, Nov. 24, 2023.

The agency must submit a request for an exemption or an equivalency to the procedural provisions under this part in writing to the Director, Office of Classification, EHSS-60/Germantown Building, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20585. The request must provide all relevant facts, to include any applicable citations, describing the procedure and why the exemption or equivalency is required. If the request is for an equivalency, it must include a proposed alternate procedure to meet the intent of the procedure for which the equivalency is being requested.

[83 FR 66007, Dec. 21, 2018, as amended at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023]
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3212 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Ethene, tetrafluoro-oxidized, polymerized 

reduced, methyl esters, reduced. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. LAUTENBERG introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Ethene, tetrafluorooxidized, polymerized reduced, methyl esters, reduced. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ETHENE, TETRAFLUORO-OXIDIZED, POLYM4 ERIZED REDUCED, METHYL ESTERS, RE5 DUCED. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 3212 IS 

‘‘ 9902.39.17 Ethene, tetrafluoro-oxidized, polymerized 

reduced, methyl esters, reduced (CAS 

No. 88645–29–8) (provided for in subheading 3907.20) ..................................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         12
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               13
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 13
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     13
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   13
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
3047.305-70 Solicitation provisions.       The contracting officer shall insert the following provisions in solicitations, as applicable:          (a) (HSAR) 48 CFR 3052.247–70, F.o.b. Origin Information, with Alternates I or II, as applicable, shall be inserted in accordance with (FAR) 48 CFR 47.305–3(b);          (b) (HSAR) 48 CFR 3052.247–71, F.o.b. Origin Only, shall be inserted in accordance with (FAR) 48 CFR 47.305–3(e); and          (c) (HSAR) 48 CFR 3052.247–72, F.o.b. Destination Only, shall be inserted in accordance with (FAR) 48 CFR 47.305–4(b).    **Parent topic:** Subpart 3047.3—Transportation in Supply Contracts
[881 NE2d 1194, 852 NYS2d 8]

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Hector Frazier, Appellant.

Decided January 15, 2008

*1022APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Appellate Advocates,*New York City *(Lynn W.L. Fahey*and *Reyna E. Marder*of counsel), for appellant.

*Richard A. Brown, District Attorney,*Kew Gardens *(Karen Wigle Weiss*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed. Defendant was informed at the time of sentencing that his sentence would include a mandatory term of postrelease supervision.

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 18

- 00386

- CR

___________________________

On Appeal from the 396th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 1451976 R
Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Birdwell 

### M ICHAEL 

### O SHEA 

### W HITE 

### , Appellant

V



### . T HE 

### S TATE OF 

### T EXAS2 MEMORANDUM OPINION Michael Oshea White, proceeding pro se, filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s alleged denial of his “Motion for Court Records for [Habeas] Corp us Proceedings.” 1 We sent White a letter expressing our concern that we do not have jurisdiction because the trial court has not entered any appealable orders. We informed him that unless he filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal, we wo uld dismiss it. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3. Although we granted several extensions of time for White to respond to our letter, he did not.
In a criminal appeal , w e generally have jurisdiction only upon a final judgment
of conviction. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc . Ann. art. 44.02; McKown v. State , 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth 1996, no pet.). The trial court has not signed a final judgment of conviction or an other order from which White may appeal. We therefore dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdict ion. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f); McKown , 915
S.W.2d at 161.

/s/ Wade Birdwell Wade Birdwell Justice

1 In this motion, White asked the trial court to permit him to review transcripts
re lating to a conviction from which he was seeking postconviction relief. In 2017, we affirmed White’s convictions for t wo counts of aggravated sexual assault and for one count of aggravated assault on a family member

. White v. State , No. 02

- 16

- 00207

- CR, 201 7 WL 2289096, at *5 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth May 25, 2017, pet. ref’d) (mem. op., not designated for publication). We have not received an order denying White’s motion to review the transcripts

.3

Do Not Publish Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
Delivered: February 1 4 , 2019
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 169 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 169

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                          June 7, 2005.
Whereas Americans of all ages cherish the pleasures of outdoor activities, and 
        too few recognize that overexposure to the sun and its ultraviolet 
        radiation, classified by the Department of Health and Human Services as 
        a known carcinogen, is the leading cause of skin cancer;
Whereas it is critically important to be safe in the sun because skin cancer is 
        the fastest growing cancer in our country today, affecting 1 in 5 
        Americans during their lifetimes and killing 1 person every hour of 
        every day;
Whereas more than 1,000,000 new cases of skin cancer will be diagnosed in the 
        United States this year, accounting for nearly half of all new cases of 
        cancer and exceeding the incidence of breast, prostate, lung, and colon 
        cancer combined;
Whereas most people receive approximately 80 percent of their lifetime sun 
        exposure by age 18, setting the stage for skin cancer later in life;
Whereas skin cancer is highly preventable by taking simple precautions when 
        engaged in outdoor activities;
Whereas research demonstrates that practicing good sun safety has the potential 
        to significantly reduce the risk of skin cancer;
Whereas the Sun Safety Alliance and its members have dedicated themselves to 
        promoting sun safety, eliminating skin cancer from excessive sun 
        exposure, and encouraging sun protection practices, especially among 
        children; and
Whereas the Sun Safety Alliance has designated the week of June 5, 2005, to June 
        11, 2005, as National Sun Safety Week: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the importance of sun safety;
            (2) encourages all Americans to protect themselves and their 
        children from the dangers of excessive sun exposure;
            (3) congratulates organizations like the Sun Safety Alliance for 
        their efforts to promote sun safety and prevent skin cancer; and
            (4) supports the goals and ideals of National Sun Safety Week.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

OSVALDO MIGUEL PEREZ,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-13-00024-CR

Appeal from the

Criminal District Court No. 1

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC#20120D01211)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 19TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2014.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Barajas, C.J. (Senior Judge), Chew, C.J. (Senior Judge)

Barajas, C.J. (Senior Judge), sitting by assignment

Chew, C.J. (Senior Judge), sitting by assignment
**EXHIBIT 32.2**
  **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**
 **18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  In connection with the Quarterly Report of IMCOR Pharmaceutical Co. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Taffy J. Williams, Ph.D., acting principal financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
   (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
   ****/s/ Taffy J. WilliamsTaffy J. Williams, Ph.D.
Acting Principal Financial OfficerDate: December 21, 2004
#### Auther W. CALLICUT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Nathaniel QUARTERMAN, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 03-11201

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

July 19, 2007.

*248Auther W. Callicut, Tennessee Colony, TX, pro se.

S. Michael Bozarth, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Texas, Austin, TX, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Auther Callicut, Texas prisoner # 1028523, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 application challenging his conviction for murder. The district court dismissed Callicut’s application as time-barred. This court granted Callicut a certificate of appealability (COA) concerning the timeliness of the § 2254 application because Callicut had provided the district court with a document showing that he had filed his state habeas application no later than January 23, 2003, rather than on April 15, 2003, as the district court had determined.

Callicut argues on appeal that he timely filed his § 2254 application because he filed his state habeas application on January 10, 2003, rather than on April 15, 2003.

The respondent argues that this court does not have jurisdiction to consider Callicut’s appeal because Callicut did not specifically argue in his COA motion to the district court that the district court’s finding concerning the date that his state habeas application was filed was incorrect. However, this court has jurisdiction over this appeal because the district court implicitly considered the issue when it denied Callicut’s COA motion. *See Whitehead v. Johnson,*157 F.3d 384, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1998).

Although Callicut did not challenge the magistrate judge’s determination of his state habeas filing date in his objections to the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, we review the district court’s factual findings for clear error and its legal rulings de novo because the district court conducted an independent review of the record before denying Callicut’s appeal as time-barred. *See Henderson v. Quarterman,*460 F.3d 654, 659 (5th Cir.2006), *cert. denied,*— U.S. —, 127 S.Ct. 1383, 167 L.Ed.2d 160 (2007); *Meister v. Texas Adjutant General’s Dep’t,*233 F.3d 332, 336 (5th Cir.2000).

Because Callicut provided the district court with a document indicating that his state habeas application had been received by the Dallas County District Clerk on January 23, 2003, the district court clearly erred in determining that Callicut filed the application on April 15, 2003. *See Henderson,*460 F.3d at 659. Using January 23, 2003, as the state habeas filing date, Callieut’s § 2254 application was *249timely filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is VACATED and this case is REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court, has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### § 987.84 Amendments.

Amendments hereto may be proposed, from time to time by any person or by the Committee.
# SUBCHAPTER D - SOCIOECONOMIC PROGRAMS

- PART 2419 - SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS 
- PART 2420 [RESERVED] 
- PART 2422 - APPLICATION OF LABOR LAWS TO GOVERNMENT ACQUISITIONS 
- PART 2424 - PROTECTION OF PRIVACY AND FREEDOM OF INFORMATION 
- PART 2425 - TRADE AGREEMENTS ACT 
- PART 2426 - OTHER SOCIOECONOMIC PROGRAMS 
- PART 2427 - PATENTS, DATA, AND COPYRIGHTS 

- PART 2419 - SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS     - Subpart 2419.2 - Policies     - 2419.201   General policy.
  - Subpart 2419.5 - Set-Asides for Small Business     - 2419.503   [Reserved]
  - Subpart 2419.7 - The Small Business Subcontracting Program     - 2419.708   Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.
  - Subpart 2419.8 - Small Business Administration Section (8)(a) Program     - 2419.800   General.
    - 2419.803   Selecting acquisitions for the 8(a) Program.
    - 2419.803-70   Procedures for simplified acquisitions under the partnership agreement.
    - 2419.804   Evaluation, offering, and acceptance.
    - 2419.804-2   Agency offering.
    - 2419.804-3   SBA acceptance.
    - 2419.804-370   SBA acceptance under partnership agreements for acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold.
    - 2419.805   Competitive 8(a).
    - 2419.805-2   Procedures.
    - 2419.806   Pricing the 8(a) contract.
    - 2419.808   Contract negotiation.
    - 2419.808-1   Sole source.
    - 2419.811   Preparing the contracts.
    - 2419.811-1   Sole source.
    - 2419.811-2   Competitive.
    - 2419.811-3   Contract clauses.
    - 2419.812   Contract administration.
- PART 2420 [RESERVED]   
- PART 2422 - APPLICATION OF LABOR LAWS TO GOVERNMENT ACQUISITIONS    - Subpart 2422.14 - Employment of the Handicapped     - 2422.1408   Contract clause.
- PART 2424 - PROTECTION OF PRIVACY AND FREEDOM OF INFORMATION    - Subpart 2424.1 - Protection of Individual Privacy     - 2424.103   Procedures.
  - Subpart 2424.2 - Freedom of Information Act     - 2424.203   Policy.
- PART 2425 - TRADE AGREEMENTS ACT    - 2425.402   Policy.
- PART 2426 - OTHER SOCIOECONOMIC PROGRAMS    - Subpart 2426.70 - Minority Business Enterprises     - 2426.7001-2426.7002   [Reserved]
- PART 2427 - PATENTS, DATA, AND COPYRIGHTS     - Subpart 2427.3 - Patent Rights Under Government Contracts     - 2427.305   Administration of patent rights clauses.
    - 2427.305-2   Administration by the Government.
  - Subpart 2427.4 - Rights in Data and Copyrights     - 2427.470   Contract clause.
EXHIBIT 32








Certification Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Detection Technology (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jacques Tizabi, Principal Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Registrant, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.








Dated:
November 19, 2012
By:
/s/ Jacques TizabiJacques TizabiPrincipal Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
Martin , Michae l (OST )
From : Sent : To : Subject : Devany , Denni s (OST ) Monday , February06 , 201 2 3:4 4 P M Martin , Michae l (OST ) FW : DO TOrde r201 1 -1 1 -2 8 •11 1 iV l 

### ^^l-'RPORTATiO N ../::TOPr:RATiO^^ S
I fE 8 - 8 P :2 : 5 0

From : Bo b Karn s rmailto:bob@sovereiqnairinc.com 1 Sent : Monday , Februar y06 , 201 2 2:2 0 PM To : Devany , Denni s (OST) ; Chri s Fogg ; Dan a J

. Reed ; Garr yDouglas ; Lyn n Parker ; M s Rut h Eveland ; Scot t Wardwell ; Theres a Fowle ran d Valeri e Lunn ; Jame s Bennett ; Chri s Krei g Subject : DOTOrde r2011-11-2 8


### Mr / DeVany , Sovereig nAi r

woul da t thi s tim e like t o withdrawin g it s proposal s t o provid e EA S servic e a t - Ba r Harbor , Main e ( Docke t

DOT-OST-2011-018 5 ) - Presqu e Isle , Main e ( Docke t DOT-OST-2000-801 2 ) - Plattsburgh , New Yor

k ( Docke t DOT-OST-2003-14783 )

. Thank You Robert Kam s V PSovereig nAi r

Inc

.
2007-2128.

#### Walsh v. Thomas.

In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Thomas P. Walsh. Sua sponte, cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3025 

To suspend temporarily the duty on woven fabric of vicuna hair. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 24, 2006 

Mr. LIEBERMAN (for himself and Mr. DODD) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on woven fabric of vicuna 

hair. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. WOVEN FABRIC OF VICUNA HAIR. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.12.23 Woven fabrics containing 85 

percent or more by weight of 

vicuna hair (provided for in 

subheading 5111.11.70, 

5111.19.60, 5112.11.60, or 

5112.19.95) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•S 3025 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

IN THE MATTER OF: LAUREN MICHELLE 

ZITSCH MOTION FOR EXTENSION 

PURSUANT TO RULE 311

:

:

:

No. 56 WM 2020

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of June, 2020, the Request for Extension Pursuant to 

Pa.B.A.R. 311 is GRANTED, IN PART. In order to afford Lauren Michelle Zitsch time to 

seek full admission to the Pennsylvania bar, her temporary admission is extended until 

January 1, 2021.