alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Subpart 1417.2 - Options

Parent topic: PART 1417 - SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS

1417.203 Solicitations.

Option quantities in excess of the 50 percent limit may, in unusual circumstances, be approved by

the CCO.

1417.206 Evaluation.

The determination in FAR 17.206(b) shall be approved by the CCO prior to soliciting offers.
Case 1:06-cr-00197-MEF-CSC Document 31 Filed 11/21/2006 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

 _____________________________

ARTHUR JAMES TIGNER, #152 184 *

Plaintiff, *

 v. * 3:06-CV-713-MHT

 (WO)

OFFICER SELLER, et al., *

Defendants. *

 _____________________________

ORDER

On December 28, 2006 Plaintiff filed a demand for trial by jury. (See Doc. No. 18.)

Defendants object to the jury demand as untimely filed. (Doc. No. 25.) Plaintiff filed a

response to the objection. (Doc. No. 26.)

Plaintiff is advised that pursuant to Rule 38(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure, a party is allowed to demand a trial by jury of any issue triable of right by a jury

by serving a demand "not later than ten days after service of the last pleading directed to such

issue." F.R.Civ.P. Rule 38(d) provides that the failure of a party to serve a jury demand as

required by the rule constitutes a waiver by the party of trial by jury. 

Here, Defendants filed their special report and answer to the complaint on November

6, 2006. Plaintiff filed his first demand for a jury trial almost two months later. Hence,

Plaintiff’s jury demand was not filed within ten days after the filing of any pleading setting

forth an issue triable by jury and he has not set forth any reason for the delay in making his

Case 3:06-cv-00713-MHT-SRW Document 28 Filed 08/15/2007 Page 1 of 2
1

Plaintiff is advised that the Seventh Amendment right to a civil jury is not absolute and may be

waived if the jury demand is not timely requested. Burns v. Lawther, 53 F.3d 1237, 1240 (11th Cir. 1995.) 

2

belated jury demand.1 See Parrott v. Wilson, 707 F.2d 1262 (1983). Plaintiff has, therefore,

waived his right to trial by jury. 

Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s December 28, 2006 Demand for Trial by Jury (Doc. No.

18) is DENIED. 

DONE, this 15th day of August 2007.

 /s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00713-MHT-SRW Document 28 Filed 08/15/2007 Page 2 of 2
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

BRIAN BONNER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) CASE NO. 3:06-cv-00715-MHT

)

INTERSTATE ARMS CORP., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DISCOVERY

COMES NOW the plaintiff, BRIAN BONNER, and moves this Honorable Court 

to permit an extension of time in this case for additional discovery set out in this Court’s 

Uniform Scheduling Order filed on July 12, 2007 as specified below and based upon the 

grounds stated:

1. The undersigned is filing this Motion with the agreement of and the concurrence 

of attorneys for the defendants, Qiqihar Hawk Industries Co., Ltd. and China 

North Industries Corporation (“Norinco”).

2. Though the parties acknowledge and recognize the due diligence of each in 

meeting the discovery goals and deadlines of the Uniform Scheduling Order 

entered on July 12, 2007, they also acknowledge that the case demands additional 

discovery efforts which cannot be completed prior to May 26, 2008, the deadline 

stated in the Uniform Scheduling Order entered July 12, 2007. The parties have 

Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 93 Filed 05/20/2008 Page 1 of 3
2

been cooperating with each other and believe that an additional sixty (60) days is 

necessary to complete discovery.

3. The parties respectfully request this Honorable Court to permit an extension of 

time to these dates for said resolutions. The movant’s attorney has been 

authorized by all parties to prepare and file this Motion.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, plaintiff prays that this Court will enter 

an Order extending the discovery deadline in the July 12, 2007 Uniform Scheduling 

Order for sixty (60) days.

/s/ David J. Hodge

DAVID J. HODGE

Of Counsel for Plaintiff

OF COUNSEL:

PITTMAN, DUTTON, KIRBY & HELLUMS, P.C.

2001 Park Place North

1100 Park Place Tower

Birmingham, Alabama 35203

(205) 322-8880

(205) 328-2711 facsimile

Nick Wooten, Esq.

WOOTEN & CARLTON, P.C.

P.O. Drawer 290

Lafayette, Alabama 36862

Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 93 Filed 05/20/2008 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on 20th day of May, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing 

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such 

filing to the following: 

Todd M. Higey, Esq.

RICHARDSON CLEMENT, P.C.

200 Cahaba Park Circle, Suite 125

Birmingham, AL 35242

Attorney for Interstate Arms and Qiqihar Hawk

James C. Barton, Jr., Esq.

Alan D. Mathis, Esq.

JOHNSTON, BARTON, PROCTOR & POWELL, LLP

2900 Regions/Harbert Plaza

1901 6th Avenue North

Birmingham, AL 35203

Attorney for Norinco

/s/David J. Hodge _____

Of Counsel for Plaintiff

Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 93 Filed 05/20/2008 Page 3 of 3
Subpart 413.3 - Simplified Acquisition

Methods

Parent topic: PART 413 - SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES

413.301 Governmentwide commercial purchase card.

USDA policy and procedures on use of the Governmentwide commercial purchase card are

established in Departmental Regulation Series 5000.

413.306 SF 44, Purchase Order-Invoice-Voucher.

The Standard Form 44 (and the previously prescribed USDA Form AD-744) is not authorized for use

within USDA.

413.307 Forms.

Form AD-838, Purchase Order, is prescribed for use by USDA in lieu of Optional Forms (OFs) 347

and 348 except that use of the OF 347 and OF 348 is authorized when utilizing the USDA Integrated

Acquisition System.
Subpart 322.8 - Equal Employment

Opportunity

Parent topic: PART 322 - APPLICATION OF LABOR LAWS TO GOVERNMENT ACQUISITIONS

322.810 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.

(h) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 352.222-70, Contractor Cooperation in Equal

Employment Opportunity Investigations, in solicitations, contracts, and orders that include the

clause at FAR 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 3:06cr199-MEF

)

ANTHONY SANFORD )

FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE

WHEREAS, on July23, 2009, this Court entered a PreliminaryOrder of Forfeiture (Doc. 60),

forfeiting the following property to the United States: a Davis Industries, model D38, Derringer

pistol, bearing serial number D125554.

WHEREAS, publication of notice was not required pursuant to Rule G(4)(a) of the

Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime and Asset Forfeiture Claims as the property is of de

minimus value and publication would exceed the property’s value; and,

WHEREAS, the Court finds that defendant Anthony Sanford has an interest in the property

that is subject to forfeiture pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 924(d) and Title 28,

United States Code, Section 2461(c). The United States has established the requisite nexus between

such property in the commission of the violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 922(g)(1).

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:

1. The United States of America’s Motion for a Final Order of Forfeiture (Doc. # 72)

is GRANTED and the following property is hereby forfeited to the United States pursuant to Title

18, United States Code, Section 924(d) and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c): a Davis

Industries, model D38, Derringer pistol, bearing serial number D125554.

2. All right, title and interest to the property described above is hereby condemned,

forfeited and vested in the United States and shall be disposed of according to law;

Case 3:06-cr-00199-MEF-CSC Document 73 Filed 02/03/10 Page 1 of 2
3. The United States District Court shall retain jurisdiction in the case for the purpose

of enforcing this Order; and,

4. The Clerk of the Court shall forward two certified copies of this Order to the United

States Attorney’s Office.

SO ORDERED this the 3 day of February, 2010. rd

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 3:06-cr-00199-MEF-CSC Document 73 Filed 02/03/10 Page 2 of 2
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ALEK L. NEWPORT, )

DC #493638, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-1921

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed April 5, 2019.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk

County; Neil A. Roddenbery, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

SILBERMAN, SALARIO, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
###### Editorial Note on Subpart A of Part 989

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 989 appear at 83 FR 53973, Oct. 26, 2018.

#### § 989.5 Raisins.

*Raisins* means grapes of any variety grown in the area, from which a significant part of the natural moisture has been removed by sun-drying or artificial dehydration, either prior to or after such grapes have been removed from the vines. Removal of a significant part of the natural moisture means removal which has progressed to the point where the grape skin develops wrinkles characteristic of wrinkles in fully formed raisins.

[37 FR 19622, Sept. 21, 1972]
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Centenary International Corporation
      (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I,  Hector
      A.
      Patron Costas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)  the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Hector A. Patron Costas


________________________________


Hector
      A.
      Patron Costas


Chief
      Executive Officer


May
      15,
      2007





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing
      certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-QSB solely pursuant to
      section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and are not being
      filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure
      document.
----

**Citizens        Financial Corp.**

**Certification        Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley **

**Act        of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

| 1. | the                    Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the company for the quarterly                    period                    ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange                    Commission                    on the date hereof (the “report”) fully complies with the requirements of                    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                    and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the                    information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material                    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                    the                    company. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | 8/8/06 |   | /s/                    Robert J. Schoonover |
|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   | Robert                    J. Schoonover     |
|   |   |   | President                                   |
|   |   |   | Chief                    Executive Officer  |

----
#### BUSH v. BUSH et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July 10, 1914.)

Action by Pine E. Bush against Marion E. Bush and others.

No opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal denied, without costs. Order filed. See, also, 148 N. Y. Supp. 1108.
Case 3:06-cr-00204-MEF-CSC Document 6 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 1 of 1
252.225-7033 Waiver of United Kingdom Levies.       As prescribed in                 225.1101             (8), use the following clause:          WAIVER OF UNITED KINGDOM LEVIES (APR 2003)          (a)  The U.S. Government may attempt to obtain a waiver of any commercial exploitation levies included in the price of this contract, pursuant to the U.S./United Kingdom (U.K.) reciprocal waiver agreement of July 1987.  If the U.K. grants a waiver of levies included in the price of this contract, the U.S. Government reserves the right to reduce the contract price by the amount of the levy waived plus associated indirect costs and profit or fee.          (b)  If the Contractor contemplates award of a subcontract exceeding $1 million to a U.K. firm, the Contractor shall provide the following information to the Contracting Officer before award of the subcontract:          (1)  Name of the U.K. firm.          (2)  Prime contract number.          (3)  Description of item to which the levy applies.          (4)  Quantity being acquired.          (5)  Amount of levy plus any associated indirect costs and profit or fee.          (c)  In the event of difficulty in identifying levies included in a price from a prospective subcontractor, the Contractor may seek advice through the Director of Procurement, United Kingdom Defence Procurement Office, British Embassy, 3100 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Washington, DC  20006.          (d)  The Contractor shall insert the substance of this clause, including this paragraph (d), in any subcontract for supplies where a lower-tier subcontract exceeding $1 million with a U.K. firm is anticipated.          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 252.225 RESERVED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         $13,009
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,373
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                26,145
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     14,011
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        129,622
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,174
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 189,366
<DEPOSITS>                                     162,919
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,189
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           12,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,961
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,297
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 189,366
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,902
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  259
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   241
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 4,302
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,265
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,506
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,796
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       90
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  25
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,895
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,032
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                          (3)
<NET-INCOME>                                       680
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.20
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   10.18
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,604
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,083
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        3
<RECOVERIES>                                         4
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,174
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,174
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
§ 1040.84 Rules against age discrimination. The rules stated in this section are limited by the exceptions contained in § 1040.86 and of these regulations. ( a ) *General rule.* No person in the United States shall, on the basis of age, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under, any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.
( b ) *Specific rules.* A recipient may not, in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance, directly or through contractual, licensing, or other arrangements use age distinctions or take any other actions which have the effect, on the basis of age, of: ( 1 ) Excluding individuals from, denying them the benefits of, or subjecting them to discrimination under, a program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance; or
( 2 ) Denying or limiting individuals in their opportunity to participate in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.
( 3 ) The specific forms of age discrimination listed in paragraph (b) of this section do not necessarily constitute a complete list.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 20020 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Israel Zenil Covarrubias,**

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:20

- CR

- 225

- 1

Before **Davis, Jones,** and **Elrod,** Circuit Judges

.
**Per Curiam :**  *

Israel Zenil Covarrubias appeals his sentence for illegal reentry. Specifically, he contends that the district court violated his right to be present at sentencing by imposing 14 discretionary conditions of supervised release in the written judgment without orally pr onounc ing them during his

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 6, 2022
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-20020 Document: 00516383586 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/06/2022No. 21

- 20020

2 sentencing hearing. The challenged conditions appear in the judgment as “standard” conditions two through 15.
The conditions were listed in an appendix to the presentence report (PSR) and were listed in or incorporated by reference in a standing order of
the Southern District of Texas

. Because the district court did not reference
the conditions or orally adopt one of the document s listing the conditions during the sentencing hearing , Zenil Covarrubia s did not have an opportunity to object , and we review for abuse of discretion. See United States v. Diggles , 957 F.3d 551, 559

- 6 0 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied , 141 S. Ct. 825 (2020 ) ; United States v. Grogan , 977 F.3d 348, 352 (5th Cir. 2020).

Th e district court did not state the conditions, allude to the m by shorthand reference, or orally adopt the PSR , its appendix, or the standing
order at sentencing

. C f. United States v. Martinez , 15 F.4th 1179, 1180

- 81 (5th Cir. 2021) ; Grogan , 977 F.3d at 351

- 54. Accordingly, the imposition of the conditions in the written judgment violated Zenil Covarrubias’s right to be present at sentencing

. See Diggles , 957 F.3d at 559

- 63 & n.5. We thus
**VACATE** the judgment in part and **REMAND** the case f or the limited purpose of amending the written judgment to conform to the oral pronouncement of sentence. See Diggles , 957 F.3d at 559

- 63; United States v.

M ireles , 471 F.3d 551, 558 (5th Cir. 2006). Case: 21-20020 Document: 00516383586 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/06/2022
#### § 15.51 When collection action may be suspended or terminated.

The NRC may suspend or terminate collection action on a claim not in excess of the monetary limitation of $100,000 or such other amount as the Attorney General may direct, exclusive of interest, penalties, and administrative costs, after deducting the amount of partial payments or collections, if any of the debt has not been referred to the DOJ for litigation. If, after deducting the amount of any partial payments or collections, the principal amount of a debt exceeds $100,000, or such other amount as the Attorney General may direct, exclusive of interest, penalties, and administrative costs, the authority to suspend or terminate rests solely with the DOJ. If the NRC believes that suspension or termination of any debt in excess of $100,000 may be appropriate, the NRC shall refer the debt to the Civil Division or other appropriate litigating division in the DOJ, using the CCLR. The referral should specify the reasons for the NRC's recommendation. If, prior to referral to the DOJ, the NRC determines that a debt is plainly erroneous or clearly without legal merit, the NRC may terminate collection activity, regardless of the amount involved, without obtaining DOJ concurrence.

[67 FR 30323, May 6, 2002]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

MAY’S DISTRIBUTING CO. INC., et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) 2:06-CV-00702-DRB

)

TOTAL CONTAINMENT, INC., et al., )

 )

Defendants. )

ORDER ON MOTION

Upon consideration of the Stipulation Extending Time to Respond to Plaintiff’s Fourth

Amended Complaint (Doc. 6, August 15, 2006), construed and docketed properly as a Joint

Motion for Extension of Time, it is 

ORDERED that the motion is hereby GRANTED to the extent that Defendant

Ticona Polymers, Inc.’s time to answer Plaintiff’s Fourth Amended Complaint is extended

up to and including September 21, 2006.

Done this 16 day of August, 2006. th

/s/ Delores R. Boyd

DELORES R. BOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 7 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 1 of 1