alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

 v. ) CR. NO. 2:06cr196-MHT

) 

NESTOR AMAIQUEMA-MACIAS )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the motion for writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum filed

August 21, 2006, and for good cause shown, it is

ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. The Clerk of this Court is hereby

DIRECTED to issue a WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD PROSEQUENDUM addressed to

Montgomery County Jail, commanding them to deliver Nestor Amaiquema-Macias, to any

United States Marshal or Deputy United States Marshal, and directing said Marshal or

Deputy to bring said prisoner before this court, to be held at Montgomery, Alabama, on

August 30, 2006, at 10:00 a.m., and to return the prisoner to said official when the court shall

have finished with him.

Done this 22 day of August, 2006. nd

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00196-MHT-CSC Document 5 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 30-5 Filed 11/22/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 30-5 Filed 11/22/2006 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2



Citizens Financial Corp.



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley

Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



I,
Thomas K. Derbyshire, Vice President, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of Citizens Financial Corp. (the company) certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



|1. | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|              |  |                            
|------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date: 5/10/05 |  | /s/ Thomas K. Derbyshire   
|              |  | Thomas K. Derbyshire       
|              |  | Vice President, Treasurer  
|              |  | Principal Financial Officer



27
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eddie Rodriguez, Appellant.

Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered on October 11, 1979, unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Concur—Ross, J. P., Markewich, Silverman, Bloom and Yesawich, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6189

WILLIAM A. FISHER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus L. WHITE, Guard; BERLIN, Guard; HOLLOWOOD, Guard; CARTY, Guard, Defendants - Appellees, and MR. ANGALO, Surgeon, Defendant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-99-199-3) Submitted: June 15, 2000 Decided: June 22, 2000Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 William A. Fisher, Appellant Pro Se. Alexander Leonard Taylor, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: William Fisher appeals the dismissal without prejudice of his pro se 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. Fisher's complaint was dismissed for failure to comply with the districtcourt's orders requiring that he comply with basic filing requirements. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). Because Fisher may be able to save this action by particularizing his complaint in compliance with the district court's orders, the order which Fisher seeks to appeal is not an appealable final order. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064 (1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
|                                      |
|--------------------------------------|
|                                      |  |
| Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas | BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware |
| As Indenture Trustee                 | As Owner Trustee |
| Attn:  Michelle H.Y. Voon  | Attn:  Kristine Gullo |
| 100 Plaza One 6th Floor         | 301 Bellevue Parkway 3rd Floor |
| Jersey City, NY 07311                | Wilmington, DE  19809 |

|                                                 |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                                 |  |
| The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. | Ally Auto Assets LLC |
| Attn:  Robert Castle                  | Ally Financial Inc. |
| 2 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1020              | 200 Renaissance Center |
| Chicago, IL  60602                    | 10th Floor, MC 482-B10-A68 |
|                                            | Detroit, MI |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| Re:    | Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2012-5 |
|   | Annual Statement as to Compliance |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| a. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period of January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013, and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has been under his supervision, and |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| b. | To the best of his knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement throughout such period. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | Very truly yours, |
|   |   |
|   | /s/ David J. DeBrunner |   |
|   | David J. DeBrunner |
|   | Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |
|   | Ally Financial Inc. |
2007-1762.

#### Lager v. Miller-Gonzalez.

Lucas App. No. L-07-1022, 2007-Ohio-4094. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 4 of the court of appeals’ Decision and Judgment Entry filed September 5, 2007:

“Whether, in a claim for statutory wrongful death damages against a claimant’s underinsured motorists coverage, ambiguity exists in the insurance contract when the policy grants coverage for damages sustained ’because of bodily injury,’ yet under an other-owned auto exclusion bars coverage for damages by the less inclusive ’for bodily injury.’ ”

Pfeifer, J., dissents.

Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., not participating.

The conflict case is *Tuohy v. Taylor,*Defiance App. No. 4-06-23, 2007-Ohio-3597.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2007-1760, *Lager v. Miller-Gonzalez,*Lucas App. No. L-07-1022, 2007-Ohio-4094.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 10, 2015

No. 04-14-00858-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF DM,

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-PA-01692

Honorable Peter A. Sakai, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The State’s brief was originally due on March 5, 2015. On March 4, 2015, the State filed 

its first request for an extension of time, requesting an additional twenty days. The State’s 

motion is GRANTED. The State’s brief is due to be filed with this court no later than March 

25, 2015. Absent extenuating circumstances, no further extensions will be given. 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of March, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CR. NO. 2:06cr193-MEF 

 ) 

JOSHUA HESTER )

MOTION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD PROSEQUENDUM

TO THE HONORABLE _________________, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JUDGE:

Comes now the United States of America, by and through its Attorney for the Middle District

of Alabama, and represents and shows unto the Court that there is pending in the United States

District Court for the Middle District of Alabama an Indictment against Joshua Hester, now in

custody of Elmore County Jail, Wetumpka, Alabama, and that said cause is set for change of plea

at Montgomery, Alabama, in this Honorable Court on November 20, 2006, at 2:00 p.m.

WHEREFORE, the United States Attorney prays that your Honor will direct theClerk of this

Court to issue a WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD PROSEQUENDUM addressed to Warden,

Elmore County Jail, Wetumpka, Alabama, commanding him to deliver said prisoner to any United

States Marshal or Deputy United States Marshal and directing said Marshal or Deputy to bring said

prisoner before this Honorable Court to be held at Montgomery, Alabama, on November 20, 2006,

at 2:00 p.m. 

Respectfully submitted this the 13th day of November, 2006.

Respectfully submitted,

LEURA G. CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/K. David Cooke, Jr.

K. DAVID COOKE, JR.

Assistant United States Attorney

 One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334) 223-7280

Fax: (334) 223-7135

E-mail: david.cooke@usdoj.gov

Case 2:06-cr-00193-MEF-CSC Document 34 Filed 11/13/2006 Page 1 of 1
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

 v. ) CR. NO. 2:06cr193-MEF

) 

JOSHUA HESTER )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the motion for writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum filed

November 13, 2006, and for good cause shown, it is

ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. The Clerk of this Court is hereby DIRECTED

to issue a WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD PROSEQUENDUM addressed to Elmore County Jail,

Wetumpka, Alabama, commanding them to deliver Joshua Hester, to any United States Marshal or

Deputy United States Marshal, and directing said Marshal or Deputy to bring said prisoner before

this court, to be held at Montgomery, Alabama, on November 20, 2006, at 2:00 p.m., and to return

the prisoner to said official when the court shall have finished with him.

DONE this _____ day of November, 2006.

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00193-MEF-CSC Document 34-2 Filed 11/13/2006 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**Citizens Financial Corp.**

**Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Robert J. Schoonover, President and Chief Executive Officer of CitizensFinancial Corp., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Citizens Financial Corp; 

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results in operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report. 

 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

 

Date:5/13/04
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 29, 2023

NO. 03

- 23

- 00227

- CV

Monica Ramirez Leyva , Appellant

v.

Aguado Stone, Inc. , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 368TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

, JUSTICES KELLY AND THEOFANIS

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on March 16, 2023

. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error

in the trial court’s judgment

. Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s judgment

. The

appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
# Subpart 615.2—Solicitation and Receipt of Proposals and Information

**Parent topic:**PART 615—CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION

## 615.204 Contract format.

(e) The Procurement Executive is the agency head's designee for the purposes of FAR 15.204(e).   

## 615.205 Issuing solicitations.

(a) Contracting officers shall release copies of solicitation mailing lists in accordance with FAR 14.205–5(a). However, the list of those firms which actually submit proposals is not releasable. Requests for information other than solicitation mailing lists shall be handled under the Freedom of Information Act.   

## 615.205-70 Use of English language.

The requirements of 614.201–70 also apply when contracting by negotiation. 

## 615.209-70 Examination of records.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 652.215–70, Examination of Records, in all solicitations and contracts other than those described in Federal Acquisition Regulation 15.209(b)(1).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRCT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

VS. CASE NUMBER: 3:06CR205-MEF

HENRY ERIK YAPIAS,

Defendant.

CONFIRMATION OF INTENT TO CHANGE PLEA

COMES now the Defendant, HENRY ERIK YAPIAS by and through SYDNEY ALBERT

SMITH, CJA Panel Attorney, and herein confirms his intent to change his plea from Not Guilty to

Guilty, in the above styled cause. 

Respectfully submitted this the 29th day of November, 2006.

S/Sydney Albert Smith

Sydney Albert Smith

ASB-3560-H70S

Attoney at Law

P. O. Drawer 389

Elba, AL 36323

Phone: 334-897-3658 

Fax: 334-897-3658

sydneyalbertsmith@charter.net

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have servede a copy of the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using

the CM/ECF sydtem which will send notifications of such filing to the following:

Chris Snyder, Assistant Unites States Attorney

Jennifer A. Hart, Federal Defenders Middle District of Alabama.

S/Sydney Albert Smith

Sydney Albert Smith

ASB-3560-H70S

Attoney at Law

P. O. Drawer 389

Case 3:06-cr-00204-MEF-CSC Document 23 Filed 11/29/2006 Page 1 of 2
Elba, AL 36323

Phone: 334-897-3658 

Fax: 334-897-3658

sydneyalbertsmith@charter.net

Case 3:06-cr-00204-MEF-CSC Document 23 Filed 11/29/2006 Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHARLES SMITH,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 461 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27th day of December, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
PUBLIC LAW 109–273—AUG. 17, 2006 120 STAT. 773

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4646:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):

Apr. 5, considered and passed House.

Aug. 2, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–273

109th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 7320 Reseda

Boulevard in Reseda, California, as the ‘‘Coach John Wooden Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

7320 Reseda Boulevard in Reseda, California, shall be known and

designated as the ‘‘Coach John Wooden Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Coach

John Wooden Post Office Building’’.

Approved August 17, 2006.

Aug. 17, 2006

[H.R. 4646]
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certainPooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2012, by and amongDeutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor, Wells FargoBank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Certificate Administrator,Paying Agent and Custodian, Torchlight Loan Services, LLC, as Special Servicer,U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC,as Operating Advisor, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates Series 2012-CCRE4 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized termsused herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in theAgreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.11 of thisAgreement, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Services andTimothy S. Ryan, Managing Director of Customer Relationship Management, dohereby certify that:

 

1.       Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.       To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hasexecuted this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton          

ManagingDirector  

WellsFargo Bank   

 

 

/s/Timothy S Ryan

TimothyS. Ryan

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

 ______________________________

MARVIN KURT NATION, #141 669 *

Plaintiff, *

v. * 2:06-CV-693-ID

WILLIE AMBERS, et al., *

Defendants. *

 __________________________________

ORDER

Upon consideration of Plaintiff's October 4, 2006 response, and for good cause, it is

ORDERED that on or before October 30, 2006 the Alabama Department of

Correction furnish Plaintiff with the last known address they have on file for Defendants

Ambers.

The Clerk is DIRECTED to furnish a copy of this order to General Counsel for the

Alabama Department of Corrections.

Done, this 19th day of October 2006.

/s/ Delores R. Boyd

DELORES R. BOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00693-ID-TFM Document 19 Filed 10/19/2006 Page 1 of 1
§ 1041.160 Communications. ( a ) The agency shall take appropriate steps to ensure effective communication with applicants, participants, personnel of other Federal entities, and members of the public. ( 1 ) The agency shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids where necessary to afford a handicapped person an equal opportunity to participate in, and enjoy the benefits of, a program or activity conducted by the agency. ( i ) In determining what type of auxiliary aid is necessary, the agency shall give primary consideration to the requests of the handicapped person.
( ii ) The agency need not provide individually prescribed devices, readers for personal use or study, or other devices of a personal nature.
( 2 ) Where the agency communicates with applicants and beneficiaries by telephone, telecommunication devices for deaf persons (TDD's) or equally effective telecommunication systems shall be used.
( b ) The agency shall ensure that interested persons, including persons with impaired vision or hearing, can obtain information as to the existence and location of accessible services, activities, and facilities.
( c ) The agency shall provide signage at a primary entrance to each of its inaccessible facilities, directing users to a location at which they can obtain information about accessible facilities. The international symbol for accessibility shall be used at each primary entrance of an accessible facility.
( d ) This section does not require the agency to take any action that it can demonstrate would result in a fundamental alteration in the nature of a program or activity or in undue financial and administrative burdens. In those circumstances where agency personnel believe that the proposed action would fundamentally alter the program or activity or would result in undue financial and administrative burdens, the agency has the burden of proving that compliance with § 1041.160 would result in such alteration or burdens. The decision that compliance would result in such alteration or burdens must be made by the agency head or his or her designee after considering all agency resources available for use in the funding and operation of the conducted program or activity, and must be accompanied by a written statement of the reasons for reaching that conclusion. If an action required to comply with this section would result in such an alteration or such burdens, the agency shall take any other action that would not result in such an alteration or such burdens but would nevertheless ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, handicapped persons receive the benefits and services of the program or activity.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CRIMINAL ACTION NO.

) 2:06cr209-MHT

BRIDGET Y. TAYLOR )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion to amend sentence (Doc.

No. 46) is denied.

DONE, this the 18th day of July, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00209-MHT-CSC Document 47 Filed 07/18/2007 Page 1 of 1