alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1 **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002** In connection with the Quarterly Report of IMCOR Pharmaceutical Co. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Taffy J. Williams, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 
 /s/TAFFY J. WILLIAMS
Taffy J. Williams, Ph.D.Chief Executive OfficerDecember 21, 2004
Jun 16 2010

Mr. Jared Testa

Embry-Riddle

3700 Willow Creek Rd

Prescott, AZ 86301

Dear Mr. Testa:

We have received your June 7, 2010, correspondence withdrawing your March 2010, petition

for an exemption from § 141.5(d) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations.

Your letter has been placed in the public docket (N o. FAA-2010-0362). No further action will

be taken on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/

Ida M. Klepper

Manager, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division
226 So.2d 770

#### Thomas Edward HAIRE v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY et al. AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY v. Gayle SMITH et al.

No. 50006.

Oct. 8, 1969.

In re: Gayle Smith and Allstate Insurance Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Webster. 224 So.2d 531, 224 So.2d 536.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.
COURTROOM DEPUTY MINUTES DATE : SEPTEMBER 25, 2006

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA DIGITAL RECORDED: 1:25 p. m. to 1:25 p.m.

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE 

PRESIDING MAG. JUDGE: CHARLES S. COODY DEPUTY CLERK: WANDA STINSON 

CASE NUMBER: 2:06CR203-MHT-CSC DEFENDANT NAME: JOSEPH STRINGER

 

APPEARANCES

GOVERNMENT DEFENDANT

ATTY. CHRISTOPHER SNYDER ATTY. DONNIE BETHEL

/ DISCOVERY STATUS: Complete.

_________________________________________________________________________________________

 _________________________________________________________________________________________

/ PENDING MOTION STATUS: None.

/ PLEA STATUS: Possible Plea

__________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________

/ TRIAL STATUS: Will take 2 days to try cases, if goes to trial.

_________________________________________________________________________________________

 REMARKS:

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

Case 2:06-cr-00203-MHT-CSC Document 12 Filed 09/25/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### In the Matter of Samuel P. Malone, Respondent, v. Grecian Garden Apartments, Inc., et al., Appellants.

(Appeal No. 2.)

Appeal dismissed as academic, without costs. Same Memorandum as in *Matter of Malone*v. *Dimco Corp.*(32 A D 2d 875) (decided concurrently herewith). (Appeal from order of Monroe Trial Term permitting inspection of books.) Present—Goldman, P. J., Del Veeehio, Marsh, Gabrielli and Moule, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3052 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3052

To suspend temporarily the duty on synthetic staple fiber of polyester 
                 having a scalloped oval cross section.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

  Mr. Carper introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on synthetic staple fiber of polyester 
                 having a scalloped oval cross section.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SYNTHETIC STAPLE FIBER OF POLYESTER HAVING A SCALLOPED OVAL 
              CROSS SECTION.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.55.04        Synthetic staple        Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           fibers of polyester,                                              31/2009          ''
                           from a patented tow                                                                 .
                           comprised of fibers
                           having a scallped
                           oval cross section
                           with four channels,
                           measuring 1.2 to 1.7
                           decitex (provided for
                           in subheading
                           5503.20.00)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 2 Filed 11/29/2005 Page 1 of 5 Case 2:05-cv-06073-JCJ Document 2 Filed 11/29/2005 Page 1 of 4

Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 2 Filed 11/29/2005 Page 2 of 5 Case 2:05-cv-06073-JCJ Document 2 Filed 11/29/2005 Page 2 of 4

Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 2 Filed 11/29/2005 Page 3 of 5 Case 2:05-cv-06073-JCJ Document 2 Filed 11/29/2005 Page 3 of 4

Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 2 Filed 11/29/2005 Page 4 of 5 Case 2:05-cv-06073-JCJ Document 2 Filed 11/29/2005 Page 4 of 4

Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 2 Filed 11/29/2005 Page 5 of 5
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

CAMELLIA THERAPEUTIC )

FOSTER AGENCY, LLC, etc., )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv735-MHT

)

THE ALABAMA DEPARTMENT )

OF HUMAN RESOURCES, )

)

Defendant. ) 

 REISSUED RULE 26(F) ORDER

The parties are reminded of the obligation, imposed

by Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to

confer and to develop a proposed discovery plan.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Rule 26(f) report

containing the discovery plan shall be filed as soon as

practicable but not later than November 13, 2006.

The longstanding practice in this district is that

dispositive motions shall be filed no later than 90 days

prior to the pretrial date. If the parties seek to vary

from that schedule, they should present, in the plan,

Case 2:06-cv-00735-MHT-CSC Document 17 Filed 10/27/2006 Page 1 of 3
2

specific case-related reasons for the requested variance.

In their Rule 26(f) report, however, the parties should

assume that the 90-day requirement will apply.

This case will be set for trial before the

undersigned judge during one of that judge's regularly

scheduled civil trial terms, within 7 to 10 months of

this order if a term is available and, if not available,

then as soon as possible thereafter. The pretrial date

is normally set within four to six weeks of a scheduled

trial term. The dates of each judge's civil trial terms

are available on the court's website located at

<http://almd.uscourts.gov> in the civil case information

section.

The court may or may not hold a scheduling conference

before issuing a scheduling order. If the court holds a

scheduling conference, counsel may participate in the

scheduling conference by conference call.

The scheduling order entered by the court will follow

the form of the Uniform Scheduling Order adopted by the

Case 2:06-cv-00735-MHT-CSC Document 17 Filed 10/27/2006 Page 2 of 3
judges of this court. The Uniform Scheduling Order is

also available on the court's website.

The report of the parties should comply with Form 35

of the Appendix of Forms to the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

DONE, this the 27th day of October, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00735-MHT-CSC Document 17 Filed 10/27/2006 Page 3 of 3
# Subpart 322.8 - Equal Employment Opportunity

**Parent topic:**PART 322 - APPLICATION OF LABOR LAWS TO GOVERNMENT ACQUISITIONS

## 322.810 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.

(h) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 352.222-70, Contractor Cooperation in Equal Employment Opportunity Investigations, in solicitations, contracts, and orders that include the clause at FAR 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity.
|

Lg

‘pay trey ooueyy 4924

e af
ae

a ABS WA
fc

% ROCK

REEF OR LEDGE

7 ‘EASTPORT S.W MAINE. B

ES LOW WATER 1:100,000 S

BATHYMETRIC _CONTOUR a NS

RVAL 10. METERS / ey 5

‘ WITH SUPPLEMENTARY ETER CONTOURS EASTPORT. SW maine \ . at mee seg a
oe DATUM IS MEAN LOW WATER #217 Jo ee

oF

PETE MEME OT
HET
470.000 Scope of part.       This part sets forth the policies, procedures and requirements governing the procurement of agricultural commodities by the Department of Agriculture for use:          (a) Under any domestic feeding and assistance program administered by the Food and Nutrition Service; and          (b) Under Title II of the Food for Peace Act (7 U.S.C. 1721 *et seq.*); the Food for Progress Act of 1985; the McGovern-Dole International Food for Education and Child Nutrition Program; and any other international food assistance program.    **Parent topic:** PART 470 - COMMODITY ACQUISITIONS
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 240 (Wednesday, December 15, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 78271]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31555]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT


Privacy Act of 1974: New System of Records

AGENCY: U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM).

ACTION: Projected date for publishing a revised notice for a new system 
of records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Based on the comments it has received in response to its 
October 5, 2010 and November 15, 2010 notices for this new system of 
records, OPM/Central-15, Health Claims Data Warehouse, OPM has 
determined that it will publish a revised systems notice. The revised 
notice will provide more detailed information regarding OPM authorities 
for maintaining the system, systems security measures that will be 
taken to protect the records, and the circumstances under which records 
will be released from the system. OPM plans to publish the revised 
notice by January 31, 2011. Although the comment period for the initial 
systems notice is closed as of December 15, 2010, the public will be 
provided an opportunity to comment on the revised notice before the 
system becomes operational.

DATES: The comment period for the initial systems notice closed on 
December 15, 2010; OPM plans to publish a revised systems notice by 
January 31, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary A. Lukowski, PhD, Manager, Data 
Analysis, at 202-606-1449.

U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
John Berry,
Director.
[FR Doc. 2010-31555 Filed 12-10-10; 10:11 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-46-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1610

JOHN S. STRITZINGER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS; JWS, minor; LLS, minor; HMS, minor; 

KATHERINE WRIGHT, On Behalf of Minor Children LLS, JWS, HMS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Columbia. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District 

Judge. (3:15-cv-01938-TLW)

Submitted: November 1, 2016 Decided: November 3, 2016

Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John S. Stritzinger, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

John S. Stritzinger seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and dismissing his 

civil action without prejudice. This court may exercise 

jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), 

and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. 

Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). Because the district 

court adopted the magistrate judge’s report concluding that 

Stritzinger’s complaint lacked sufficient factual allegations to 

state a plausible claim pursuant to the Individuals with 

Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 to 1482 (2012), we 

conclude that the order Stritzinger seeks to appeal is neither a 

final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. 

See Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc., 807 F.3d 619, 623-

24, 629-30 (4th Cir. 2015). Accordingly, we deny Stritzinger’s 

motion to appoint counsel and dismiss the appeal for lack of 

jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
# September 2024

Download printable version(508.09 KB)

                        -  Connective Tissue Disorders Recognizing and Treating Structural Defects Your body’s connective tissues, like tendons and ligaments, help your joints move. They also give structure and flexibility to skin, blood vessels, and more. But connective tissues disorders can cause serious health problems.
                        -  Tired, Achy Eyes? Finding Relief for Eye Discomfort Are your eyes tired, dry, or achy? Many factors can contribute to these symptoms. But a big culprit can be intense use of your eyes, like too much screen time. Learn ways to find relief.

                        -  
Health Capsule
How Aura May Trigger Migraine Pain 
                        -  
Health Capsule
Don’t Give In to Gum Disease 
                        -  
Featured Website
Genomics Educational Resources 

Contributors to this issue: 
                    - Vicki Contie
                    - Kristine Duru 
                    - Tianna Hicklin
                    - Sharon Reynolds

### Featured Stories

Is It Flu, COVID-19, Allergies, or a Cold?

Good Sleep for Good Health

Sleep On It

Marvels of Mucus and Phlegm

NIH Office of Communications and Public Liaison				Building 31, Room 5B52				Bethesda, MD 20892-2094nihnewsinhealth@od.nih.gov				Tel: 301-451-8224

**Editor:**				Harrison Wein, Ph.D.**Managing Editor:**				Tianna Hicklin, Ph.D.**Illustrator:**				Alan Defibaugh

**Attention Editors:**				Reprint our articles and illustrations in your own publication. Our material is not copyrighted. Please acknowledge				*NIH News in Health*				as the source and send us a copy.

For more consumer health news and information, visit				health.nih.gov.

For wellness toolkits, visit				www.nih.gov/wellnesstoolkits.

## Footer

- Subscribe
- Find us on Facebook
- RSS

- Home
- Past Issues
- About Us
- Privacy Policy
- Disclaimers
- Accessibility

- Freedom of Information Act
- No Fear Act
- HHS Vulnerability Disclosure
- Office of Inspector General
- USA.gov – Government Made Easy

NIH…Turning Discovery Into Health®

National Institutes of Health    9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland 20892

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Back to Top
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board

# AGENCY:

Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board.

# ACTION:

Notice.

*Board Action:*                     Pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3511(d), the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, and the FASAB Rules of Procedure, as amended in October, 2010, notice is hereby given that the Accounting and Auditing Policy Committee (AAPC) has issued two new Federal Financial Accounting Technical Release exposure drafts entitled                     *Implementation Guidance on the Accounting for the Disposal of G-PP&E and Implementation Guidance for Estimating the Historical Cost of G-PP&E.*

                    The Exposure Drafts are available on the FASAB home page                     *http://www.fasab.gov/​exposure.html.*                     Copies can be obtained by contacting FASAB at (202) 512-7350.                

Respondents are encouraged to comment on any part of the exposure draft. Written comments are requested by February 11, 2011, and should be sent to: Wendy M. Payne, Executive Director, Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board, 441 G Street, NW., Suite 6814, Mail Stop 6K17V, Washington, DC 20548.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Wendy Payne, Executive Director, at (202) 512-7350.

Authority: Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463.

Dated: December 10, 2010.

Charles Jackson,

Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2010-31538 Filed 12-15-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1610-02-P
#### MECUM v. BECKER.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

December 11, 1914

Action by Elizabeth A. O. Mecum against d. Adelbert Becker.

No opinion. Motion, granted, unless appellant complies with terms stated in order. Order filed. See, also, 149 N. Y. Supp. 974; 150 N. Y. Supp. 1096.
Subpart 1001.1 - Purpose, Authority,

Issuance

Parent topic: PART 1001 - DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY ACQUISITION REGULATION

(DTAR) SYSTEM

1001.101 Purpose.

This subpart establishes Chapter 10, the Department of the Treasury Acquisition Regulation (DTAR),

within Title 48 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) System. The DTAR contains policies and

procedures that supplement FAR coverage and directly affect the contractual relationship between

the Department of the Treasury and its business partners (e.g., prospective offerors/bidders and

contractors). When FAR coverage is adequate, there will be no corresponding DTAR coverage.

1001.104 Applicability.

The DTAR applies to all acquisitions of supplies and services, which obligate appropriated funds. For

acquisitions made from non-appropriated funds, the Senior Procurement Executive will determine

the rules and procedures that will apply. The DTAR does not apply to the acquisitions of the U.S.

Mint.

1001.105 Issuance.

1001.105-1 Publication and code arrangement.

The DTAR and its subsequent changes will be published in the Federal Register and codified in the

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). The DTAR will be issued as 48 CFR Chapter 10.

1001.105-2 Arrangement of regulations.

(a) References and citations. The DTAR is divided into the same parts, subparts, sections,

subsections, and paragraphs as the FAR except that 10 or 100 will precede the DTAR citation so that

there are four numbers to the left of the first decimal. Reference to DTAR material must be made in

a manner similar to that prescribed by FAR 1.105-2(c).

1001.105-3 Copies.

Copies of the DTAR in Federal Register or CFR form may be purchased from the Superintendent of

Documents, Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC 20402.
1001.106 OMB Approval under the Paperwork Reduction

Act.

OMB has assigned the following control numbers that must appear on the upper right corner of the

face page of each solicitation, contract, modification, and order: OMB Control No. 1505-0081

(Offeror submissions), OMB Control No. 1505-0080 (Contractor submissions), OMB Control No.

1505-0107 (Protests). OMB regulations and OMB's approval and assignment of control numbers are

conditioned upon Treasury bureaus not requiring more than three copies (including the original) of

any document of information. OMB has granted a waiver to permit the Department to require up to

eight copies of proposal packages, including proprietary data, for solicitations, provided that

contractors who submit only an original and two copies will not be placed at a disadvantage.
§ 1040.89-12 Alternate funds disbursal procedure. ( a ) When DOE withholds funds from a recipient under these regulations, the Secretary or designee may disburse the withheld funds directly to an alternate recipient(s), any public or private organization or agency, or State or political subdivision of the State.
( b ) The Secretary or designee will require any alternate recipient to demonstrate: ( 1 ) The ability to comply with these regulations; and
( 2 ) The ability to achieve the goals of the Federal statute authorizing the Federal financial assistance.
[50 FR 8089, Feb. 27, 1985, as amended at 68 FR 51348, Aug. 26, 2003]