alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of First Community Financial Corporation, (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), I, Jody D. Graybill, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of the operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                                      
|------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 13, 2011 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Jody D. Graybill                 
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Jody D. Graybill,                    
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)        



39
Case 2:06-cr-00198-WKW-CSC Document 45 Filed 01/18/2007 Page 1 of 1
313.003 Policy.       Electronic and information technology (EIT) supplies and services acquired pursuant to Federal Acquisition Regulation part 13 shall comply with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended. See part 339.    **Parent topic:** PART 313 - SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES
§ 12.104 Eligibility of applicants. ( a ) To be eligible for an award of attorney fees and other expenses under the EAJA, the applicant must be a party to the adversary adjudication for which it seeks an award. The term “party” is defined in 5 U.S.C. 551(3). The applicant must show that it meets all conditions of eligibility set out in this subpart and in subpart B.
( b ) The types of eligible applicants are as follows: ( 1 ) An individual with a net worth of not more than $2 million;
( 2 ) The sole owner of an unincorporated business who has a net worth of not more than $7 million, including both personal and business interests, and not more than 500 employees;
( 3 ) A charitable or other tax-exempt organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3)) with not more than 500 employees;
( 4 ) A cooperative association as defined in section 15(a) of the Agricultural Marketing Act (12 U.S.C. 1141j(a)) with not more than 500 employees; and
( 5 ) Any other partnership, corporation, association, unit of local government, or organization with a net worth of not more than $7 million and not more than 500 employees.
( c ) For the purpose of eligibility, the net worth and number of employees of an applicant shall be determined as of the date the proceeding was initiated.
( d ) An applicant who owns an unincorporated business will be considered as an “individual” rather than a “sole owner of an unincorporated business” if the issues on which the applicant prevails are related primarily to personal interests rather than to business interests.
( e ) The employees of an applicant include all persons who regularly perform services for remuneration for the applicant, under the applicant's direction and control. Part-time employees shall be included on a proportional basis.
( f ) The net worth and number of employees of the applicant and all of its affiliates shall be aggregated to determine eligibility. Any individual, corporation, or other entity that directly or indirectly controls or owns a majority of the voting shares or other interests of the applicant, or any corporation or other entity of which the applicant directly or indirectly owns or controls a majority of the voting shares or other interest, will be considered an affiliate for purposes of this part, unless the adjudicative officer determines that such treatment would be unjust and contrary to the purposes of the Act in light of the actual relationship between the affiliated entities. In addition, the adjudicative officer may determine that financial relationships of the applicant other than those described in this paragraph constitute special circumstances that would make an award unjust.
( g ) An applicant that participates in a proceeding primarily on behalf of one or more other persons or entities that would be ineligible is not itself eligible for an award.
UN PU BLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 7343

DARRELL L. GOSS
,
Plaintiff

- Appellant
,
and

SASHA GASKINS
,
Plaintiff
,

v.
SHONTATE MORLEY; MARY BRUMEUCCHI; CHRISTINE LONG; S.C. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; BRYAN P. STIRLING,

Defendants

- Appellees
,

a nd

PATTY BRITT

- POOSER
,
Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina
, at Charleston

. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. ( 2:19

- cv

- 02469

- BHH )

Submitted : July 29, 2022 Decided: August 9, 2022

Before GREGORY
, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

. USCA4 Appeal: 21-7343 Doc: 11 Filed: 08/09/2022 Pg: 1 of 32 Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Darrell L. Goss , Appellant Pro Se. Gordon Wade Cooper
, BUYCK LAW FIRM, LLC
, Mt. Pleasant , South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 21-7343 Doc: 11 Filed: 08/09/2022 Pg: 2 of 33 PER CURIAM:
Darrell L. Goss appeals the district court’s order adopting in part and modifying in
part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to
Defendants in his civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Goss v. Morley
,

No. 2:19

- cv

- 02469

- BHH (D.S.C. Sept. 9, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials b efore this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 21-7343 Doc: 11 Filed: 08/09/2022 Pg: 3 of 3
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

CAMELLIA THERAPEUTIC )

FOSTER AGENCY, LLC, etc., )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv735-MHT

)

THE ALABAMA DEPARTMENT )

OF HUMAN RESOURCES, )

)

Defendant. ) 

 RULE 26(F) ORDER

The parties are reminded of the obligation, imposed

by Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to

confer and to develop a proposed discovery plan.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Rule 26(f) report

containing the discovery plan shall be filed as soon as

practicable but not later than October 16, 2006.

The longstanding practice in this district is that

dispositive motions shall be filed no later than 90 days

prior to the pretrial date. If the parties seek to vary

from that schedule, they should present, in the plan,

Case 2:06-cv-00735-MHT-CSC Document 12 Filed 09/26/2006 Page 1 of 3
2

specific case-related reasons for the requested variance.

In their Rule 26(f) report, however, the parties should

assume that the 90-day requirement will apply.

This case will be set for trial before the

undersigned judge during one of that judge's regularly

scheduled civil trial terms, within 7 to 10 months of

this order if a term is available and, if not available,

then as soon as possible thereafter. The pretrial date

is normally set within four to six weeks of a scheduled

trial term. The dates of each judge's civil trial terms

are available on the court's website located at

<http://almd.uscourts.gov> in the civil case information

section.

The court may or may not hold a scheduling conference

before issuing a scheduling order. If the court holds a

scheduling conference, counsel may participate in the

scheduling conference by conference call.

The scheduling order entered by the court will follow

the form of the Uniform Scheduling Order adopted by the

Case 2:06-cv-00735-MHT-CSC Document 12 Filed 09/26/2006 Page 2 of 3
judges of this court. The Uniform Scheduling Order is

also available on the court's website.

The report of the parties should comply with Form 35

of the Appendix of Forms to the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

DONE, this the 26th day of September, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00735-MHT-CSC Document 12 Filed 09/26/2006 Page 3 of 3
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1095 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1095

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                        December 9 (legislative day, December 8), 2006.
Whereas on November 9, 2005, a series of terrorist bombs exploded at the 
        Radisson, Hyatt, and Days Inn hotels in Amman, Jordan, resulting in the 
        deaths of scores of civilians and the injuries of hundreds of others;
Whereas Jordan has been targeted in several terrorist attacks over the past few 
        years and likely remains a target for Islamic extremists;
Whereas Jordan provided unequivocal support to the United States  after the  
        September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks;
Whereas Jordan has arrested suspected terrorists with possible ties to Osama bin 
        Laden's Al Qaeda organization and has provided other critical support to 
        the global war on terrorism; and
Whereas Jordan  remains  a  firm ally of the United States in the global war 
        against terrorism and in helping to achieve a lasting peace in the 
        Middle East: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) notes with sorrow the one-year anniversary of the November 9, 
        2005, terrorist attacks in Amman, Jordan;
            (2) condemns in the strongest possible terms the November 9, 2005, 
        terrorist attacks;
            (3) expresses its ongoing condolences to the families and friends of 
        those individuals who were killed in the attacks and its sympathies to 
        those individuals who were injured;
            (4) reiterates its support of the Jordanian people and its 
        government;
            (5) values the strong and  lasting friendship between Jordan and the 
        United States and  the continuing cooperation of the two nations in 
        political, economic, and humanitarian endeavors; and
            (6) expresses its readiness to support and assist the Jordanian 
        authorities in their efforts to pursue, disrupt, undermine, and 
        dismantle the networks that plan and carry out such terrorist attacks as 
        the November 9, 2005, terrorist attacks in Amman, Jordan.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
1801.000 Scope of part.       This part sets forth general information about the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) Supplement, also referred to as the NFS.    **Parent topic:** PART 1801—FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATIONS SYSTEM
PUBLIC LAW 109–323—OCT. 11, 2006 120 STAT. 1757

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 6106:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):

Sept. 27, considered and passed House.

Sept. 29, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–323

109th Congress

An Act

To extend the waiver authority for the Secretary of Education under title IV,

section 105, of Public Law 109–148.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.

Section 105 of title IV of division B of Public Law 109–148

(119 Stat. 2797) is amended—

(1) in subsection (b), by inserting ‘‘and, at the discretion

of the Secretary, for fiscal year 2007’’ after ‘‘2006’’; and

(2) in subsection (c)(2)—

(A) by inserting ‘‘or 2007’’ after ‘‘fiscal year 2006’’;

and

(B) by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2007’’ and inserting ‘‘for

the respective succeeding fiscal year’’.

Approved October 11, 2006.

Oct. 11, 2006

[H.R. 6106]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

DELOISE PRICE, | 

 | 

 PLAINTIFF | 

 | 

VS. | CASE NO. 2:06-CV-721 

 | 

WAL-MART STORES, INC., | 

et al., | 

 | 

 DEFENDANTS | 

DEFENDANTS’ SECOND AMENDED WITNESS LIST

 Come now the Defendants and submit the following list of witnesses who 

may be used at trial: 

1. Dr. Tai Chung, 6936 Winton Blount Blvd, Montgomery, Alabama. 

2. Wayne Lee, 717 East Artesia Blvd, Carson, California. 

3. Joseph T. Carpenter, 303 Sterling Centre, 4121 Carmichael Road, 

Montgomery, Alabama. 

4. Henry Fuller, Wal-Mart, Montgomery, Alabama. 

5. Any witness necessary for rebuttal and/or impeachment. 

6. Any witness listed by any other party. 

 /s/ Bethany L. Bolger

 Dennis R. Bailey 

 Bethany L. Bolger 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

Case 2:06-cv-00721-MHT-TFM Document 49 Filed 01/23/2008 Page 1 of 2
2

Of counsel: 

RUSHTON, STAKELY, JOHNSTON & GARRETT, P.A. 

184 Commerce Street 

Post Office Box 270 

Montgomery, Alabama 36101-0270 

(334) 206-3234 (phone) 

(334) 481-0031 (fax) 

drb@rsjg.com (e-mail) 

blb@rsjg.com (e-mail) 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that on this the 23rd day of January 2008, I filed the 

foregoing document using the CM/ECF system, which will forward a copy of same 

to the following counsel of record: 

 Jock M. Smith 

 Valerie Rucker Russell 

 Cochran, Cherry, Givens, Smith, Lane & Taylor 

 Post Office Box 830419 

 Tuskegee, Alabama 36083 

 /s/ Bethany L. Bolger

 Of counsel 

Case 2:06-cv-00721-MHT-TFM Document 49 Filed 01/23/2008 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT


PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION
      1350








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Simclar, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Marshall W. Griffin,
      Jr., Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, hereby certify as
      of
      the date hereof, solely for purpose of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of
      the
      United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





This
      Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission.








/s/
      Marshall W. Griffin, Jr.


Marshall
      W. Griffin, Jr.,


Chief
      Financial Officer and Secretary


Simclar,
      Inc.


October
      27, 2006
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

February 23, 2007

NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE

To: ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD

Case Style: D E Enterprises, LLC v. Zurich North America

Case Number: #3:06-cv-00692-WHA

Referenced Pleading: Notice of Service of Defendant Assurance Company of America’s

 First Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents

Docket Entry Number: #15

The referenced pleading was electronically filed on 2/22/2007 in this case and is not in

compliance with the local rules and/or administrative procedures of this court. 

******This pleading is discovery and is not allowed pursuant to Local Rule 5.1 NON-FILING

OF CIVIL DISCOVERY.

The pleading is hereby STRICKEN from the record and the parties are instructed to disregard

the entry of this pleading on the court’s docket. Parties should be aware that the striking of

this entry does not affect their responsibilities as to the discovery process.

Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 16 Filed 02/23/2007 Page 1 of 1
# SUBCHAPTER C—CONTRACTING METHODS AND CONTRACT TYPES   

- PART 713—SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES 
- PART 714—SEALED BIDDING 
- PART 715—CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION 
- PART 716—TYPES OF CONTRACTS 
- PART 717—SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS 

- PART 713—SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES    - 713.000   Scope of part.
  - 713.001   Definitions.
  - Subpart 713.1—Procedures.     - 713.106-370   Partner vetting.
- PART 714—SEALED BIDDING    - Subpart 714.4—Opening of Bids and Award of Contract     - 714.407-3   Other mistakes disclosed before award.
    - 714.407-4   Mistakes after award.
    - 714.408-170   Partner vetting.
- PART 715—CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION    - Subpart 715.3—Source Selection     - 715.303   Responsibilities.
    - 715.303-70   Responsibilities of USAID evaluation committees.
    - 715.305   Proposal evaluation.
    - 715.370   Alternative source selection procedures.
    - 715.370-1   Title XII selection procedure—general.
    - 715.370-2   Title XII selection procedure—collaborative assistance.
  - Subpart 715.70—Partner Vetting     - 715.70   Partner vetting.
  - Subpart 715.6—Unsolicited Proposals     - 715.602   Policy.
    - 715.604   Agency points of contact.
- PART 716—TYPES OF CONTRACTS    - Subpart 716.3—Cost Reimbursement Contracts     - 716.303   Cost-sharing contracts.
    - 716.306   [Reserved]
    - 716.406   Contract clauses.
  - Subpart 716.5—Indefinite-Delivery Contracts     - 716.501-270   Partner vetting—indefinite-delivery contracts.
    - 716.505-70   Partner vetting—orders under indefinite delivery contracts.
    - 716.506   Solicitation provision and contract clause.
- PART 717—SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS    - Subpart 717.70—Pharmaceutical Products     - 717.770   General.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE

DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CR. NO. 3:06CR199-MEF

ANTHONY SANFORD

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD PROSEOUENDUM

TO THE SHERIFF AND/OR KEEPER OF ST. CLAIR CORRECTIONAL FACILITY

SPRNGVILLE , ALABAMA

and

TO THE UNITED STATES MARSHAL FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA OR

ANY OTHER UNITED STATES MARSHAL:

GREETINGS:

We command you, that you have the body of ANTHONY SANFORD

a prisoner in your institution and under your control, as it is said, under safe and secure conduct,

to appear before the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, at the

courtroom of said court, in the city of MONTGOMERY on August 13, 2008, at 10:30 A.M.,

to answer charges pending in said court and for such other proceedings as may appear proper to

the court; and thereafter, that you return the said defendant to the above-named institution under

safe and secure conduct.

BY ORDER OF THE COURT.

DONE, this the 26th day of June, 2008.

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 3:06-cr-00199-MEF-CSC Document 9 Filed 06/26/2008 Page 1 of 1
#### § 993.108 Non-human consumption outlet.

*Non-human consumption outlet* means any livestock feeder or manufacturer of inedible syrup, industrial alcohol, animal feed, or other product for non-human use, who has established, to the satisfaction of the committee, that any prunes or prune waste received for a non-human use will be used only within such outlet.

[26 FR 8278, Sept. 2, 1961; 26 FR 8483, Sept. 9, 1961]
# SUBCHAPTER F - SPECIAL CATEGORIES OF CONTRACTING

- PART 1034 - MAJOR SYSTEM ACQUISITION 
- PART 1036 - CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS 

- PART 1034 - MAJOR SYSTEM ACQUISITION    - Subpart 1034.0 - General     - 1034.001   Definitions.
    - 1034.004   Acquisition strategy.
- PART 1036 - CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS    - Subpart 1036.6 - Architect-Engineer Services     - 1036.602-5   Short selection process for contracts not to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold.
Contact Summary

April 30, 2012

Bob Mastropietro, VP Technology, Lodge Cottrell

Telephone: 908-304-2616

Mr. Mastropietro was contacted for information on the performance of existing ESP at portland 

cement plants. He stated that existing ESP, with any modifications, could probably reduce PM to 

about 0.01 – 0.02 gr/dscf. He thought they could be modified to reach levels as low as 0.002 –

0.004 by adding additional fields, but that it would be costly and may be limited due to the 

additional space requirements.
---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---
Exhibit 10.12


AMENDMENT

TO THE

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC. SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE

RETIREMENT PLAN FOR EXECUTIVES IN CAREER BANDS 6 AND ABOVE


	
  

 	
  

 
	
  

 	
           Pursuant
 to the authority granted to proper officers of Honeywell International Inc.
 (the “Company”) by the Management Development and Compensation Committee of
 the Board of Directors on December 11, 2009, the Honeywell International Inc.
 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan for Executives in Career Bands 6 and
 Above shall be amended effective January 1, 2010 to include as eligible pay
 for an eligible participant (defined below) the greater of (a) the incentive
 compensation received under the terms of the Honeywell International Inc.
 Incentive Compensation Plan for Executive Employees (“ICP”) in 2009 (earned
 in 2008), or (b) the incentive compensation received under the terms of the
 ICP in 2010 (earned for 2009); provided, however, that if incentive
 compensation is included under clause (a), the value of the incentive
 compensation received in 2009 (earned in 2008) shall be reduced by the actual
 incentive compensation received and credited to Honeywell’s qualified pension
 plans and/or non-qualified pension plans in 2010 (earned for 2009) to avoid
 double counting. If incentive compensation is included under clause (a), such
 incentive compensation shall be treated under the applicable pension formula
 as eligible pay earned in 2009 and paid in 2010. 

 
	
  

 	
  

 
	
  

 	
           This
 amendment shall be subject to the following conditions: 

 






	
  

 	
  

 	
  

 	
  

 
	
  

 	
  

 	
 (a)

 	
 an eligible
 participant is a participant who, on March 15, 2010, is earning a pension
 benefit under the Honeywell Retirement Earnings Plan and is employed by the
 Company in Band 5, 6 or 7, other than a participant who receives zero
 incentive compensation in 2010 (earned for 2009) and is coded in the
 Company’s records as having a performance planning reason for such (e.g.,
 “performance issue” (PI) or “performance termination” (PT)); and 

 
	
  

 	
  

 	
 (b)

 	
 the amounts
 required to be included in eligible pay shall not be included more than one
 time. 

 






	
  

 	
  

 
	
  

 	
 HONEYWELL
 INTERNATIONAL INC.

 
	
  

 	
  

 
	
  

 	
  

 
	
  

 	
 /s/ Mark
 James

 
	
  

 	
 Mark James

 
	
  

 	
 Senior Vice
 President – Human Resources and Communications

 
	
  

 	
  

 
	
  

 	
  

 
	
 Dated:
 January 12, 2010