alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1021.300 General requirements. ( a ) DOE shall determine, under the procedures in the CEQ Regulations and this part, whether any DOE proposal: ( 1 ) Requires preparation of an EIS;
( 2 ) Requires preparation of an EA; or
( 3 ) Is categorically excluded from preparation of either an EIS or an EA. DOE shall prepare any pertinent documents as required by NEPA, the CEQ Regulations, or this part.
( b ) Notwithstanding any other provision of these regulations, DOE may prepare a NEPA document for any DOE action at any time in order to further the purposes of NEPA. This may be done to analyze the consequences of ongoing activities, support DOE planning, assess the need for mitigation, fully disclose the potential environmental consequences of DOE actions, or for any other reason. Documents prepared under this paragraph shall be prepared in the same manner as DOE documents prepared under paragraph (a) of this section.
SUBCHAPTER I—AGENCY SUPPLEMENTARY

REGULATIONS

PARTS 1872–1899 [RESERVED]

PARTS 1872–1899 [RESERVED]
#### § 927.73 Separability.

If any provision of this subpart is declared invalid, or the applicability thereof to any person, circumstance, or thing is held invalid, the validity of the remaining provisions and the applicability thereof to any other person, circumstance, or thing shall not be affected thereby.
#### Campbell Coal Company *v.*White.

Hill, J.

1. In an action to recover damages, brought against a municipal corporation and two private corporations, the petition alleged: A certain company was undertaking to construct and had constructed a house at a certain place on one of the public streets of the city, and in so doing had placed in the street a lime-box, a mortar-box, and a pile of sand and brick. The other defendant company furnished the material, the lime-box and the mortar-box, and the sand and brick, and placed them in the street. An ordinance of the municipality authorized any person or persons actually building, or about to build or repair any building, to collect and lay the necessary material therefor in the street adjoining the place of construction, and to have the privilege of using one half of the sidewalk and one half the width of the street adjoining, under certain conditions. One of these was, that “the owner or proprietor of such material” shall cause lights to be placed upon the obstruction at night. This was not done, and all of the defendants knew such fact, and all of them neglected and failed to provide the necessary lights. “All of said defendants were the owners or proprietors of said materia] in said street.” They knew, or ought to have known, that the material was dangerous in the street without having a light or *284lamp placed upon it. By reason of the failure to perform the duty imposed by the ordinance, a person passing along the street in the plaintiff’s automobile, without fault on his part, ran against the obstruction, causing damages to the machine. *Held,*that as against a general demurrer this made a case against the corporation alleged to have furnished and placed the material in the street and to have been one of the owners thereof, and there was no error in refusing to dismiss the petition against such corporation on general demurrer. *Wilson*v. *White,*71 *Ga.*506 (51 Am. R. 269).

July 18, 1913.

Action for damages. Before Judge Bell. Fulton superior court. April 26, 1912.

*Robert C. & Philip H. Alston,*for plaintiff in error.

*Lawton Nalley,*contra.

2. The special grounds of demurrer were properly overruled.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Case 2:06-cr-00198-WKW-CSC Document 60 Filed 09/06/2007 Page 1 of 1
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

J.B., a minor child, by and )

through his next friend, )

Addie Ward, on behalf of )

himself and all others )

similarly situated, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv755-MHT

) 

WALTER WOOD, in his )

individual capacity, )

)

Defendant. )

J.B., a minor child, by and )

through his next friend, )

Addie Ward, on behalf of )

himself and all others )

similarly situated, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv908-MHT

) 

WALTER WOOD, in his )

individual capacity, )

)

Defendant. )

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 74 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 2
ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion to supplement the

record (Doc. No. 72) is granted. 

DONE, this the 26th day of November, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 74 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 2 of 2
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

) 

v. ) 1:06-CR-170-WHA

)

ROY DALE WALLACE )

GOVERNMENT’S MOTION FOR DOWNWARD DEPARTURE

AND CERTIFICATION OF SUBSTANTIAL ASSISTANCE

PURSUANT TO § 5K1.1, UNITED STATES SENTENCING GUIDELINES

COMES NOW the United States of America, by and through Leura G. Canary,

United States Attorney for the Middle District of Alabama, and files the above-captioned

motion, and as reasons therefore, submits the following:

1. Defendant entered a plea of guilty under Rule 11(c)(1)(C) to an indictment

charging violations of Title 21, United States Code, Section 846 pursuant to a plea

agreement.

2. Defendant agreed to cooperate with the Government in the instant cause and

in subsequent investigations as necessary, and to waive his rights to appeal or collaterally

attack the guilty plea or sentence.

3. The United States submits the defendant has cooperated with the United States

and has abided by the terms of his plea agreement. The assistance provided by

Defendant should be considered substantial.

4. The Government is satisfied that Defendant is entitled to be considered for a

reduction of sentence under § 5K1.1 U.S.S.G., and moves this Court to reduce the

applicable offense level of Defendant by four levels. 

Case 1:06-cr-00170-WHA-CSC Document 402 Filed 04/10/2007 Page 1 of 3
Respectfully submitted, this the 10th day of April, 2007.

LEURA G. CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/ A. Clark Morris

A. CLARK MORRIS

Assistant United States Attorney

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334)223-7280

Fax: (334)223-7135

E-mail: clark. morris@usdoj.gov

ASB-1613-N77A

Case 1:06-cr-00170-WHA-CSC Document 402 Filed 04/10/2007 Page 2 of 3
3

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

) 

v. ) 1:06-CR-170-WHA

)

ROY DALE WALLACE )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on April 10, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing with the

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to

the following: Jim Cooper, Esquire.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ A. Clark Morris

A. CLARK MORRIS

Assistant United States Attorney

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334)223-7280

Fax: (334)223-7135

E-mail: clark. morris@usdoj.gov

ASB-1613-N77A

Case 1:06-cr-00170-WHA-CSC Document 402 Filed 04/10/2007 Page 3 of 3
3030.201-5 Waiver.       (a) The CPO is authorized to waive the applicability of the Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) under (FAR) 48 CFR 30.201–5(b). This authority may not be redelegated.          (c) Waiver requests must conform to (HSAR) 48 CFR 3001.70.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 3030.2—CAS Program Requirements
AMENDMENT
NO. 1 TO

    2007
EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

    OF

    POINT.360

    FEBRUARY
10, 2010

     

    6.1.2
(iv) is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

     

    6.1.2    Corporate
Transactions.  Except as otherwise provided in the applicable agreement, in the
event of a Corporate Transaction (as defined below), the Administrator shall
notify each holder of an Option or SAR at least thirty (30) days prior thereto
or as soon as may be practicable.  To the extent not then exercised all Options
and SARs shall terminate immediately prior to the consummation of such Corporate
Transaction unless the Administrator determines otherwise in its sole
discretion; provided. however, that the Administrator, in its sole discretion,
may (i) permit exercise of any Options or SARs prior to their termination, even
if such Options or SARs would not otherwise have been exercisable, and/or (ii)
provide that all or certain of the outstanding Options and SARs shall be assumed
or an equivalent Option or SAR substituted by an applicable successor
corporation or entity or any Affiliate of the successor corporation or entity.
A “Corporate Transaction” means (i) a liquidation or dissolution of the Company;
(ii) a merger or consolidation of the Company with or into another corporation
or entity (other than a merger with a wholly-owned subsidiary); (iii) a sale of
all or substantially all of the assets of the Company; or (iv) A purchase or
other acquisition of more than 50% of the outstanding stock of the Company by
one person, other than Haig Bagerdjian, or by more than one person acting in
concert with persons other than Haig Bagerdjian.
Exhibit 10.18





PLEDGE AMENDMENT


This PLEDGE AMENDMENT, dated November 28, 2017, is delivered pursuant to Section 6(d) of the Pledge Agreement referred to below.  All defined terms herein shall have the meanings ascribed thereto or incorporated by reference in the Pledge Agreement.


The undersigned hereby certifies that the representations and warranties in Section 5 of the Pledge Agreement are and continue to be true and correct, as to the shares, membership interests, partnership interests and other equity interests pledged prior to this Pledge Amendment and as to the shares, membership interests, partnership interests and other equity interests pledged pursuant to this Pledge Amendment.


The undersigned further agrees that this Pledge Amendment may be attached to that certain Pledge Agreement, dated August 4, 2016, HARVEST CAPITAL CREDIT CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, in favor of PACIFIC WESTERN BANK, a California state chartered bank (as amended, restated, supplemented, or otherwise modified from time to time, the “ Pledge Agreement ”) and that the Pledged Equity listed on Annex A to this Pledge Amendment shall be and become a part of the Pledged Collateral referred to in said Pledge Agreement and shall secure all Secured Obligations referred to in said Pledge Agreement.


The undersigned (i) acknowledges that any shares, membership interests, partnership interests or other equity interests not included in the Pledged Collateral at the discretion of Agent may not otherwise be pledged by Pledgor to any other Person or otherwise used as security for any obligations other than the Secured Obligations, and (ii) represents and warrants that all representations and warranties set forth in the Pledge Agreement, are true, correct and complete as to the Pledged Equity listed on this Pledge Amendment as if made on the date hereof.





HARVEST CAPITAL CREDIT CORPORATION ,


a Delaware corporation





By: /s/ Richard P. Buckanavage


Name:    Richard P. Buckanavage


Title:      Chief Executive Officer and President











ANNEX A


to Pledge Amendment


PLEDGED EQUITY


Name and Address of PledgorPledged EntityClass of Stock, Membership Interests or Partnership InterestsCertificate Number(s)Number of Shares, Membership Interests or Partnership InterestsHarvest Capital Credit Corporation767 Third Avenue, 25thFloorNew York, New York 10017Attn: Richard P. Buckanavage, President and CEOHCAP ICC, LLC,a Delaware limited liability companyN/AN/A100%


























[Harvest] Pledge Amendment
§ 20.1301 Dose limits for individual members of the public. ( a ) Each licensee shall conduct operations so that— ( 1 ) The total effective dose equivalent to individual members of the public from the licensed operation does not exceed 0.1 rem (1 mSv) in a year, exclusive of the dose contributions from background radiation, from any medical administration the individual has received, from exposure to individuals administered radioactive material and released under § 35.75, from voluntary participation in medical research programs, and from the licensee's disposal of radioactive material into sanitary sewerage in accordance with § 20.2003, and
( 2 ) The dose in any unrestricted area from external sources, exclusive of the dose contributions from patients administered radioactive material and released in accordance with § 35.75, does not exceed 0.002 rem (0.02 millisievert) in any one hour.
( b ) If the licensee permits members of the public to have access to controlled areas, the limits for members of the public continue to apply to those individuals.
( c ) Notwithstanding paragraph (a)(1) of this section, a licensee may permit visitors to an individual who cannot be released, under § 35.75, to receive a radiation dose greater than 0.1 rem (1 mSv) if— ( 1 ) The radiation dose received does not exceed 0.5 rem (5 mSv); and
( 2 ) The authorized user, as defined in 10 CFR Part 35, has determined before the visit that it is appropriate.
( d ) A licensee or license applicant may apply for prior NRC authorization to operate up to an annual dose limit for an individual member of the public of 0.5 rem (5 mSv). The licensee or license applicant shall include the following information in this application: ( 1 ) Demonstration of the need for and the expected duration of operations in excess of the limit in paragraph (a) of this section;
( 2 ) The licensee's program to assess and control dose within the 0.5 rem (5 mSv) annual limit; and
( 3 ) The procedures to be followed to maintain the dose as low as is reasonably achievable.
( e ) In addition to the requirements of this part, a licensee subject to the provisions of EPA's generally applicable environmental radiation standards in 40 CFR part 190 shall comply with those standards.
( f ) The Commission may impose additional restrictions on radiation levels in unrestricted areas and on the total quantity of radionuclides that a licensee may release in effluents in order to restrict the collective dose.
[56 FR 23398, May 21, 1991, as amended at 60 FR 48625, Sept. 20, 1995; 62 FR 4133, Jan. 29, 1997; 67 FR 20370, Apr. 24, 2002; 67 FR 62872, Oct. 9, 2002]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>6
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED 
FROM THE FORM 10-Q AS OF MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY 
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>1
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>             958,253
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>            516,812
<RECEIVABLES>                           0
<ASSETS-OTHER>                      7,207
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>               88,836
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    612,855
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>         195,948
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>               195,948
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                         0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>          858,348
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>             106,990
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>             106,990
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>               0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                  0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                 0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>         (441,441)
<NET-ASSETS>                      416,907
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                       0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                     154
<OTHER-INCOME>                          0
<EXPENSES-NET>                     62,903
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>           (62,749)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>           (6,695)
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>         (26,482)
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>             (95,926)
<EQUALIZATION>                          0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>               0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                   0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                 0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>             0
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                     0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>            (95,926)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                 0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>               0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                 0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>              0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>               2,565
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                    63,153
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>              464,870
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                   9
<PER-SHARE-NII>                        (1)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                 0 <F1>
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                    0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>               0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                    0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                     8
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                      13.5
<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING>                  0
<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE>                    0
<FN>
A zero value is used since the change in net unrealized fair value is not 
allocated to General Partners and Limited Partners as it is not taxable.  
Only taxable gains or losses are allocated in accordance with the 
Partnership Agreement.
</FN>

</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Constellium N.V. (the Company) on Form 20-F
for the year ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jean-Marc Germain, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:
March 21, 2017



|    |  |                       |  |                        
|--- |  | --------------------- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Jean-Marc Germain
|    |  | Name:                 |  | Jean-Marc Germain      
|    |  | Title:                |  | Chief Executive Officer
#### § 983.23 Processing.

*Processing* means hulling and drying pistachios in preparation for market.

[69 FR 17850, Apr. 4, 2004. Redesignated at 74 FR 56539, Nov. 2, 2009]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
-0614 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CHRISTOPHER I TOULOUSE,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including November 21, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 13 2022

10/13/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0614
1301.000 Scope of part.       This part sets out general Department of Commerce Acquisition Regulation (CAR) policies, including information regarding the maintenance and administration of the CAR, acquisition policies and practices, and procedures for deviation from the CAR and the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). This part describes the Commerce Acquisition Regulation in terms of establishment, relationship to the Federal Acquisition Regulation, arrangement, applicability, and deviation procedures.    **Parent topic:** PART 1301 - DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ACQUISITION REGULATIONS SYSTEM
# 2832.006 Reduction or suspension of contract payments upon finding of fraud.

**Parent topic:**PART 2832 - CONTRACT FINANCING
#### § 986.5 To certify.

*To certify* means the issuance of a certification of inspection of pecans by the inspection service.
EXHIBIT 32.2








CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO


SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(b)


OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Tennessee Valley Authority (the “Company”) for the year ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John M. Thomas, III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, for the purposes of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.














/s/ John M. Thomas, IIIJohn M. Thomas, IIIChief Financial OfficerNovember 19, 2010
§ 13.5 Review by the reviewing official. ( a ) If, based on the report of the investigating official under § 13.4(b), the reviewing official determines that there is adequate evidence to believe that a person is liable under § 13.3 of this part, the reviewing official shall transmit to the Attorney General a written notice of the reviewing official's intention to issue a complaint under § 13.7.
( b ) Such notice shall include— ( 1 ) A statement of the reviewing official's reasons for issuing a complaint;
( 2 ) A statement specifying the evidence that supports the allegations of liability;
( 3 ) A description of the claims or statements upon which the allegations of liability are based;
( 4 ) An estimate of the amount of money or the value of property, services, or other benefits requested or demanded in violation of § 13.3 of this part;
( 5 ) A statement of any exculpatory or mitigating circumstances that may relate to the claims or statements known by the reviewing official or the investigating official; and
( 6 ) A statement that there is a reasonable prospect of collecting an appropriate amount of penalties and assessments.