alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2419.812 Contract administration.

(e) Awards under the Partnership Agreement cited in 2419.800 are subject to 15 U.S.C. 637(a)(21).

These contracts contain the clause at 2452.219-71, Section 8(a) Direct Award (Deviation), which

requires the 8(a) contractor to notify the SBA and the HUD contracting officer when ownership of

the firm is being transferred.

Parent topic: Subpart 2419.8 - Small Business Administration Section (8)(a) Program
1828.372 Clause for minimum insurance coverage.       In accordance with FAR 28.306(b) and 28.307, the contracting officer may insert a clause substantially as stated at 1852.228–75, Minimum Insurance Coverage, in fixed-price solicitations and in cost-reimbursement contracts. The contracting officer may modify the clause to require additional coverage, such as vessel liability, and higher limits if appropriate for a particular acquisition.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1828.3—Insurance
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

) 

v. ) 1:06-CR-170-WHA

)

ROY DALE WALLACE )

MOTION TO DECREASE DEFENDANT’S OFFENSE LEVEL

PURSUANT TO § 3E1.1(b), UNITED STATES SENTENCING GUIDELINES

(ACCEPTANCE OF RESPONSIBILITY)

COMES NOW the United States of America, by and through Leura G. Canary,

United States Attorney for the Middle District of Alabama, and files the above-captioned

Motion, and as reasons therefore, submits the following:

1. Defendant qualifies for a reduction in Defendant’s sentence pursuant to U.S.S.G

§ 3E1.1(b) as Defendant assisted authorities in the investigation and prosecution of

Defendant’s own misconduct by timely notifying authorities of Defendant’s intention to

enter a plea of guilty, thereby permitting the United States to avoid preparing for trial and

permitting the Government and this Court to allocate their resources efficiently.

2. Accordingly, pursuant to U.S.S.G § 3E1.1(b), the United States respectfully

moves this Court to reduce the Defendant’s offense level by one level. Combined with the

two-level reduction applied to Defendant’s offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1(a),

a total reduction of three levels should be applied to Defendant’s offense level for

Defendant’s acceptance of responsibility.

Case 1:06-cr-00170-WHA-CSC Document 403 Filed 04/10/2007 Page 1 of 3
Respectfully submitted this the 10 day of April, 2007. th

LEURA G. CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/ A. Clark Morris

A. CLARK MORRIS

Assistant United States Attorney

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334)223-7280

Fax: (334)223-7135

E-mail: clark. morris@usdoj.gov

ASB-1613-N77A

Case 1:06-cr-00170-WHA-CSC Document 403 Filed 04/10/2007 Page 2 of 3
3

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

) 

v. ) 1:06-CR-170-WHA

)

ROY DALE WALLACE )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on April 10, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing with the

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the

following: Jim Cooper, Esquire.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ A. Clark Morris

A. CLARK MORRIS

Assistant United States Attorney

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334)223-7280

Fax: (334)223-7135

E-mail: clark. morris@usdoj.gov

ASB-1613-N77A

Case 1:06-cr-00170-WHA-CSC Document 403 Filed 04/10/2007 Page 3 of 3
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

OWEN J. ROGAL, D.D.S., )

P.C. d/b/a THE PAIN CENTER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 3:06cv728-MHT

) 

SKILSTAF, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion for leave to reply

(Doc. No. 76) is granted.

DONE, this the 22nd day of August, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 78 Filed 08/22/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### PACE et al. v. AMEND et al. (two cases).

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

December 24, 1914.)

Actions by Francis P. Pace and another against Otto P. Amend and others.

No opinion. Motions denied, with $10 costs. Orders filed. See, also, 164 App. Div. 209, 149 N. Y. Supp. 738.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SECTION 906

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael Hart, the President (Principal Executive Officer) of NF Investment Corp. (the Company), hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  |  | the Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: March 11, 2016/s/ Michael HartMichael Hart
President (Principal
Executive Officer)




|* | The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subpart 2929.1 - General

Parent topic: PART 2929 - TAXES

2929.101 Resolving tax problems.

Contract tax problems or questions must be referred by the contracting officer to the Office of the

Solicitor for resolution.
###### Editorial Note on Subpart A of Part 989

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 989 appear at 83 FR 53973, Oct. 26, 2018.

#### § 989.7 Golden Seedless raisins.

*Golden Seedless raisins* means raisins, the production of which includes soda dipping, sulfuring, and artificial dehydration.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-72,493]

                    By application dated October 25, 2010, a worker requested administrative reconsideration of the negative determination regarding workers' eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The determination was issued on October 6, 2010, and the Notice of Determination was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on October 25, 2010 (75 FR 65520-21).                

The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination based on the findings that neither the subject firm nor a client firm shifted to/acquired from a foreign country the supply of services like or directly competitive with the services supplied by the workers, that the subject firm did not import like or directly competitive services during the relevant period, and that the subject workers are not adversely affected secondary workers.

The request for reconsideration states that “Ananke Inc. performed application packaging services for John Hancock * * * In September 2009, John Hancock replaced * * * Ananke Inc. with * * * Cognizant Technology Solutions (an offshoring/outsourcing company)” and included support documentation.

The Department of Labor has carefully reviewed the request for reconsideration and the existing record, and has determined that the Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.

## Conclusion

After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted.

Signed at Washington, DC this 1st day of December, 2010.

Del Min Amy Chen,

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2010-31137 Filed 12-10-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Searched for **http://bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/pdlc00.pdf**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/pdlc00.pdf**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
#### § 984.20 Kernelweight.

*Kernelweight* means the determined weight of the kernels in a quantity of walnuts regardless of their quality.

[39 FR 35328, Oct. 1, 1974]
Subpart 1536.2 - Special Aspects of

Contracting for Construction

Parent topic: PART 1536 - CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS

1536.209 Construction contracts with architect-engineer

firms.

(a) The provisions of FAR 36.209 do not apply to subcontractors performing treatability studies.

(b) The provisions of FAR 36.209 also do not apply to subcontractors whose input during the design

phase does not substantially affect the course of the design work.

(c) Approval under FAR 36.209 is not required for subcontractors under paragraph (a) or (b) of this

section. Approval for all other subcontractors and prime contractors may be granted by the Chief of

the Contracting Office. In reviewing requests for approval, the Chief of the Contracting Office shall

consider factors such as the availability of other firms to perform the necessary construction or

Superfund remedial action work, the estimated cost to the Government, and the policy of the Agency

to promote the use of innovative technology.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0041

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

ERIC D. YEATON,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 22, 2020, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 14 2020

05/14/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0041
NO ONE ATTENDED THE PUBLIC HEARING 

AND 

NO COMMENTS WERE RECEIVED 

DURING THE 30-DA Y COMMENT PERIOD
Case 3:06-cv-00631-MHT-VPM Document 4 Filed 08/07/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### § 987.68 Verification of reports and records.

For the purpose of checking compliance with record keeping requirements and verifying reports filed by handlers, the Secretary and the Committee, through its duly authorized employees, shall have access to any premises where dates are held and, at any time during reasonable business hours, shall be permitted to examine any dates held and any and all records with respect to matters within the purview of this part. Handlers shall furnish labor necessary to facilitate such examinations at no expense to the Committee. All handlers shall maintain complete records establish and which accurately show the quantity of dates handled, disposed of, and withheld. The Committee, with the approval of the Secretary, may establish the type of records to be maintained. Such records shall be retained by handlers for not less than two years subsequent to the termination of each crop year.

[27 FR 6818, July 19, 1962, as amended at 36 FR 15039, Aug. 12, 1971; 43 FR 4253, Feb. 1, 1978]
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

OWEN J. ROGAL, D.D.S., )

P.C. d/b/a THE PAIN CENTER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 3:06cv728-MHT

) 

SKILSTAF, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion to dismiss (doc. no. 3)

is denied without prejudice. The motion appears to raise

factual issues that should be resolved on a summaryjudgment motion after a reasonable opportunity for

discovery.

DONE, this the 26th day of September, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 24 Filed 09/26/2006 Page 1 of 1
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 189 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that a day ought 

to be established to bring awareness to the issue of missing persons. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 5, 2005 

Mr. SWEENEY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

a day ought to be established to bring awareness to 

the issue of missing persons. 

Whereas Wednesday, April 6, 2005, marks the 27th birthday 

of Suzanne Lyall, a University of Albany student, who 

has been missing since March 2, 1998; 

Whereas in 2004, there were 47,890 persons over the age of 

18 reported missing to law enforcement agencies nationwide; 

Whereas regardless of age or circumstances, all missing persons have families who need support and guidance to endure the days, months, or years they may spend searching for their missing loved ones; and 
2 

•HRES 189 IH 

Whereas it is important to applaud the committed efforts of 

families, law enforcement agencies, and concerned citizens who work to locate missing persons and to prevent 

all forms of victimization: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that— 

3 (1) a day ought to be established to bring 

4 awareness to the issue of missing persons; 

5 (2) the people of the United States should ob6 serve such a day with appropriate programs and ac7 tivities; and 

8 (3) the people of the United States should sup9 port worthy initiatives and increased efforts to locate 

10 missing persons. 

Æ
Order entered February 14, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01313-CV

INSURANCE ALLIANCE, Appellant

V.

LAKE TEXOMA HIGHPORT, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 397th Judicial District Court

Grayson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 08-0604-397

ORDER

The Court has before it appellant’s February 12, 2013 second agreed motion to extend 

time to file appellant’s brief. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS appellant to file its 

brief by March 20, 2013. No further extensions will be granted absent a showing of exceptional 

circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
#### In the Matter of Love’M Sheltering, Inc., Appellant, v County of Suffolk et al., Respondents.

Submitted January 7, 2008;

decided January 15, 2008

Reported below, 33 AD3d 923.

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3575 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3575

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain women's footwear valued over 
          $20 a pair with coated or laminated textile fabrics.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 27, 2006

  Mr. Carper introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on certain women's footwear valued over 
          $20 a pair with coated or laminated textile fabrics.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN WOMEN'S FOOTWEAR VALUED OVER $20 A PAIR WITH COATED 
              OR LAMINATED TEXTILE FABRICS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.64.07      Women's footwear,   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         except vulcanized                                                  31/2009
                         footwear and
                         footwear with
                         waterproof molded
                         bottoms,
                         including bottoms
                         comprising an
                         outer sole and
                         all or part of
                         the upper, valued
                         over $20/pair,
                         designed to be
                         worn in lieu of,
                         but not over,
                         other footwear as
                         a protection
                         against water,
                         oil, grease or
                         chemicals or cold
                         or inclement
                         weather where
                         such protection
                         includes
                         protection
                         against water
                         that is imparted
                         by the use of a
                         coated or
                         laminated textile
                         fabric (provided
                         in subheading
                         6402.99.20)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
322.810 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.       (h) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 352.222-70, Contractor Cooperation in Equal Employment Opportunity Investigations, in solicitations, contracts, and orders that include the clause at FAR 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 322.8 - Equal Employment Opportunity
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 125 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 841) to require States to hold 

special elections to fill vacancies in the House of Representatives not 

later than 45 days after the vacancy is announced by the Speaker 

of the House of Representatives in extraordinary circumstances, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 1, 2005 

Mr. COLE of Oklahoma submitted the following resolution; 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 841) to require 

States to hold special elections to fill vacancies in the 

House of Representatives not later than 45 days after 

the vacancy is announced by the Speaker of the House 

of Representatives in extraordinary circumstances, and 

for other purposes.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 242 (Friday, December 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 79025]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31596]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Limo Foundation

    Notice is hereby given that, on November 2, 2010, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), LiMo Foundation (``LiMo'') 
filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General 
and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. 
The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Adobe Systems 
Incorporated, San Jose, CA; Gemalto SA, Meudon, France; and Samsung 
SDS, Suwon, Republic of Korea, have been added as parties.
    Also, Azingo, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA; Casio Hitachi, Tokyo, JAPAN; and 
Motorola, Inc., Libertyville, IL, have withdrawn as parties to this 
venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of this group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and LiMo intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On March 1, 2007, LiMo filed its original notification pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on April 9, 
2007 (72 FR 17583).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on July 1, 
2010. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on September 9, 2010 (75 FR 54914).

Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2010-31596 Filed 12-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M