49–010 

Calendar No. 617 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! SENATE 2d Session 109–337 

ELDER JUSTICE ACT 

SEPTEMBER 19, 2006.—Ordered to be printed 

Mr. GRASSLEY, from the Committee on Finance, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany S. 2010] 

The Committee on Finance, to which was referred the bill (S. 

2010) to amend the Social Security Act to enhance the Social Security of the Nation by ensuring adequate public-private infrastructure and to resolve to prevent, detect, treat, intervene in, and prosecute elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation, and for other purposes, 

reports favorably thereon with an amendment in the nature of a 

substitute and recommends the bill, as amended, do pass. 

I. BACKGROUND 

More than a quarter of a century has passed since the first Congressional hearings on elder abuse declared it to be a national disgrace. Throughout this period, Congressional action has remained 

limited. From a policy perspective, elder justice means assuring 

that adequate public-private infrastructure and resources exist to 

prevent, detect, treat, understand, intervene in and, where appropriate, prosecute elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation. From an individual perspective, elder justice is the right of every older individual to be free of abuse, neglect, and exploitation. 

There are between 500,000 and 5 million older individuals who 

are abused in this country every year. Despite the dearth of data 

to quantify precisely the number of seniors subjected to abuse, experts agree that we have only seen the tip of the iceberg. In fact, 

according to the National Elder Abuse Incidence Study conducted 

by the National Center on Elder Abuse, 84 percent of all cases of 

elder abuse are never reported. It is clear that abuse and neglect 

shorten the victim’s life, often triggering a downward spiral, ‘‘tipping over’’ an otherwise productive, self-sufficient older individual. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
2 

There are three main types of elder abuse: abuse and neglect in 

homes and domestic settings; abuse and neglect in institutions and 

other types of residential care; and financial fraud and exploitation. 

Studying the results of efforts to respond to other family violence 

issues, such as domestic violence and child abuse, has resulted in 

the conclusion that abuse, neglect, and exploitation require a multifaceted solution, including public health, social service, and law enforcement approaches. While these other types of abuse have been 

recognized and receive sizable Federal funding, elder abuse remains under-researched, under-reported, and under-funded. The 

Elder Justice Act provides Federal leadership to those on the front 

lines who are fighting elder abuse with scarce resources and fragmented systems. 

Highlights of the Elder Justice Act include the following: 

Elevating elder justice issues to national attention. The bill will 

establish within the Department of Health and Human Services 

programmatic, grant-making, policy and technical assistance functions relating to elder justice; creation of a public-private Coordinating Council to coordinate activities of all relevant Federal agencies, States, communities, and private and not-for-profit entities; 

and provide a consistent funding stream and national coordination 

for Adult Protective Services (APS). 

Improving the quality, quantity, and accessibility of information. 

An elder justice national data repository will be developed to increase the knowledge base and collect data about elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation. 

Increasing knowledge and supporting promising projects. To help 

overcome the lack of research on elder abuse and related issues, 

the Elder Justice Act will enhance research, clinical practice, training, and dissemination of information relating to these issues. Priorities include jump-starting intervention research, developing community strategies to make elders safer, and enhancing multi-disciplinary efforts. 

Developing forensic capacity. There is scant data to assist in the 

detection of elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation. Creating new forensic expertise (similar to that in child abuse) will promote detection and increase expertise. New programs will train health professionals in both forensic pathology and geriatrics. 

Increasing prosecution. The Elder Justice Act establishes new 

penalties for failure to promptly report crimes in residential care 

facilities and to provide notice of nursing home closings. 

Training. The Act supports training to combat elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation both within individual disciplines and in 

multi-disciplinary (such as public health-social service-law enforcement) settings. 

Model State Laws and Practices. A study will review State practices and laws relating to elder justice. 

Increasing Security, Collaboration, and Consumer Information in 

Long-Term Care. The bill will: 

• Improve prompt reporting of crimes in long-term care settings, 

• Enhance long-term care staffing, 

• Enhance the long-term care ombudsman program, 

• Require a study on establishment of a national nurse aide 

registry to enable background checks on nurse’s aids, 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
3 

• Provide information about long-term care for consumers 

through a Consumer Clearinghouse, • Require new reporting of crimes in nursing homes on the 

official Federal website, and • Require establishment of consumer information on nursing 

homes on the official Federal website. 

Evaluations/Accountability. The bill contains provisions to determine what works and assure funds are properly spent. 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY

After dozens of hearings in various Senate and House committees from 1979 to the present, the Elder Justice Act, S. 2933, was 

first introduced by Senator John Breaux (D–LA) and Senator Orrin 

G. Hatch (R–UT) on September 12, 2002, and referred to the Senate Finance Committee. Under the Chairmanship of Senator Max 

Baucus (D–MT), the Senate Finance Committee held a hearing on 

June 18, 2002, entitled Elder Justice: Protecting Seniors from 

Abuse and Neglect. Five experts on elder abuse testified, including 

Robert Blancato, President, National Committee for Prevention of 

Elder Abuse; Catherine Hawes, Ph.D., Professor, Department of 

Health Policy and Management, School of Rural Public Health, 

Texas A&M University; Joanne Otto, M.S.W., Executive Director, 

National Association of Adult Protective Services Administrators; 

Carmel Dyer, M.D., Associate Professor of Medicine, Baylor College 

of Medicine; Randolph Thomas, M.A., Law Enforcement Instructor, 

South Carolina Department of Public Safety, Criminal Justice 

Academy; and Richard Bonnie, J.D., Chair, Panel to Review Risk 

and Prevalence of Elder Abuse and Neglect, Committee on National 

Statistics of the National Research Council. Prominent in the discussion were the findings of the National Research Council publication entitled Elder Mistreatment: Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation 

in an Aging America. The National Research Council was directed 

by Congress to assess the current state of knowledge in the area 

of elder mistreatment and to formulate a set of recommendations 

for a research agenda in the field. The National Research Council 

reported that it was unable to formulate a research agenda for several reasons, including unclear and inconsistent definitions; unclear 

and inadequate measures; incomplete professional accounts; lack of 

population-based data; lack of prospective data; lack of control 

group; and lack of systematic evaluation studies. No legislative action was taken during the 107th Congress. 

Senators Breaux and Hatch introduced the Elder Justice Act, S. 

333, again during the 108th Congress on February 10, 2003, and 

the bill was referred to the Senate Finance Committee. 

On September 28, 2004, under the leadership of Chairman 

Charles E. Grassley (R–IA), the Senate Finance Committee considered the bill in Executive Session and reported it unanimously. It 

was placed on the Legislative Calendar, but the Senate failed to act 

on the bill. 

Senator Orrin G. Hatch and Senator Blanche L. Lincoln (D–AR) 

introduced the Elder Justice Act, S. 2010, again during the 109th 

Congress on November 15, 2005, and the bill was referred to the 

Senate Finance Committee. Under the leadership of Chairman 

Charles E. Grassley, the Senate Finance Committee considered the 

bill in Executive Session on August 4, 2006 and, for the second 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
4 

time, unanimously reported it as an amendment in the nature of 

a substitute. 

II. SECTION-BY-SECTION ANALYSIS 

Short Title; Table of Contents; Definitions 

PRESENT LAW

No provision. 

COMMITTEE BILL

The bill sets forth the title of the Act as the Elder Justice Act 

and outlines the table of contents. It also specifies that any term 

defined in new amendment to title XX of the Social Security Act 

has the meaning set forth by the Committee Bill. 

Findings 

PRESENT LAW

No provision. 

COMMITTEE BILL

The Committee Bill describes the following findings of Congress: 

1. The proportion of the United States population age 60 

years or older will drastically increase in the next 30 years as 

more than 76,000,000 baby boomers approach retirement and 

old age. 

2. Each year, anywhere between 500,000 and 5,000,000 elders in the United States are abused, neglected, or exploited. 

3. Elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation have no boundaries 

and cross all racial, social class, gender, and geographic lines. 

4. Victims of elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation are not 

only subject to injury from mistreatment and neglect, they are 

also 3.1 times more likely than elders who were not victims of 

elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation to die at an earlier age 

than expected. 

5. There is a general dearth of data as to the nature and 

scope of elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation. 

6. Despite the dearth of data in the field, experts agree that 

most cases of elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation are never 

reported and that abuse, neglect, and exploitation shorten a 

victim’s life, often triggering a downward spiral of an otherwise 

productive, self-sufficient elder’s life. Programs addressing 

other difficult issues such as domestic violence and child abuse 

and neglect have demonstrated the need for a multi-faceted 

law, combining public health, social service, and law enforcement approaches. 

7. For over 20 years, Congress has been presented with facts 

and testimony calling for a coordinated Federal effort to combat elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation. 

8. The Federal Government has been slow to respond to the 

needs of victims of elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation or to 

undertake prevention efforts. 

9. No Federal law has been enacted that adequately and 

comprehensively addresses the issues of abuse, neglect, and exVerDate Aug 31 2005 21:37 Sep 22, 2006 Jkt 004910 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\SR337.XXX SR337

hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
5 

ploitation, and there are very limited resources available to 

those in the field who directly deal with the issues. 

10. Differences in State laws and practices in the areas of 

elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation lead to significant disparities in prevention, protective and social services, treatment 

systems, and law enforcement and lead to other inequities. 

11. The Federal Government has played an important role in 

promoting research, training, public safety, data collection, the 

identification, development, and dissemination of promising 

health care, social, and protective services, and law enforcement practices relating to child abuse and neglect, domestic violence, and violence against women. The Federal Government 

should promote similar efforts and protections relating to elder 

abuse, neglect, and exploitation. 

12. The Federal Government should provide leadership and 

assist States and communities in their efforts to protect elders 

in the United States by—

(A) promoting coordinated planning among all levels of government; 

(B) generating and sharing knowledge relevant to protecting 

elders; 

(C) providing leadership to combat the abuse, neglect, and 

exploitation of the Nation’s elders; and 

(D) providing resources to States and communities to promote elder justice. 

13. The problem of elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation requires a comprehensive approach that—

(A) integrates the work of health, legal, and social services 

agencies and organizations; 

(B) emphasizes the need for prevention, reporting, investigation, assessment, treatment, and prosecution of elder abuse, 

neglect, and exploitation at all levels of government; 

(C) ensures that sufficient numbers of properly trained personnel with specialized knowledge are in place to—

(i) treat, assess, and provide services relating to elder abuse, 

neglect, and exploitation; and 

(ii) carry out elder protection duties; 

(D) is sensitive to ethnic and cultural diversity; 

(E) recognizes the role of mental health, disability, dementia, 

substance abuse, medication mismanagement, and family dysfunction problems in increasing and exacerbating elder abuse, 

neglect, and exploitation; and 

(F) balances elders’ right to self-determination with society’s 

responsibility to protect elders. 

14. The human, social, and economic cost of abuse, neglect, 

and exploitation is high and includes unnecessary expenditures 

of funds from many public programs. 

15. The failure to coordinate activities relating to, and comprehensively prevent and treat, elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation threatens the future and well-being of millions of elders in the United States. 

16. All elements of society in the United States have a 

shared responsibility in responding to a national problem of 

elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
6 

Purposes 

PRESENT LAW

No provision. 

COMMITTEE BILL

The Committee Bill defines the purposes of the Elder Justice Act, 

as follows: 

1. To enhance the social security of the Nation by ensuring adequate public-private infrastructure and resolve to prevent, detect, 

treat, understand, and intervene in, and where appropriate, aid in 

the prosecution of, elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation. 

2. To bring a comprehensive approach to preventing and combating elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation, a long invisible problem that afflicts the most vulnerable among the aging population 

of the United States. 

3. To raise the issue of elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation to 

national attention, and to create the infrastructure at the Federal, 

State and local levels to ensure that individuals and organizations 

on the front lines, who are fighting elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation with scarce resources and fragmented systems, have the resources and information needed to carry out their fight. 

4. To bring a comprehensive multidisciplinary approach to elder 

justice. 

5. To set in motion research and data collection to fill gaps in 

knowledge about elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation. 

6. To supplement activities of service providers and programs, to 

enhance training, and to leverage scarce resources efficiently, in 

order to ensure that elder justice receives the attention it deserves 

as the Nation’s population ages. 

7. To recognize and address the role of mental health, disability, 

dementia, substance abuse, medication mismanagement, and family dysfunction problems in increasing and exacerbating elder 

abuse, neglect, and exploitation. 

8. To create short- and long-term strategic plans for the development and coordination of elder justice research, programs, studies, 

training, and other efforts nationwide. 

9. To promote collaborative efforts and diminish overlap and 

gaps in efforts in developing the important field of elder justice. 

10. To honor and respect the right of all persons with diminished 

capacity to decision making, autonomy, self-determination, and dignity of choice. 

11. To respect the wishes of individuals with diminished capacity 

and their family members in providing supportive services and care 

plans intended to protect elders from abuse, neglect (including selfneglect), and exploitation. 

Definitions 

PRESENT LAW

No provision. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
7 

COMMITTEE BILL

Section 4 adopts the meaning of any term used in Section 2011 

of the Social Security Act, unless specifically provided otherwise in 

the Committee Bill. 

Elder justice 

PRESENT LAW

No provision. 

COMMITTEE BILL

Section 5 of the Committee Bill would amend the Social Security 

Act by adding ‘‘Elder Justice’’ to an amended title XX, entitled 

‘‘Block Grants to States for Social Services and Elder Justice’’ and 

adding a new ‘‘Subtitle 2—Elder Justice’’. 

Definitions 

PRESENT LAW

Under current law, ‘‘abuse,’’ ‘‘exploitation,’’ ‘‘long term care facility,’’ and ‘‘neglect’’ are defined in the ‘‘Older Americans Act.’’

COMMITTEE BILL

For data collection and other purposes of the bill, the Committee 

Bill defines the following terms: adult protective services, caregiver, direct care, elder, elder justice, eligible entity, exploitation, 

fiduciary, grant, guardianship, Indian tribe, law enforcement, longterm care, long-term care facility, neglect, self-neglect, serious bodily injury, criminal sexual abuse, social, State, State legal assistance developer, and State long-term care ombudsman. 

Definitions related to some of the purposes of the amended title 

XX are defined in other related statutes. Related statutes are as 

follows: 

PRESENT LAW AND COMMITTEE BILL: DEFINITIONS 

Term Present law Committee Bill 

Abuse ........................... Section 102(13) of the Older Americans Act: 

‘‘Abuse’’ of an older person is defined as 

the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable 

confinement, intimidation, or cruel punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or 

mental anguish, or deprivation by a person, 

including a caregiver, of goods or services 

that are necessary to avoid physical harm, 

mental anguish or mental illness.

‘‘Abuse’’ is defined as the knowing infliction of 

physical or psychological harm or the knowing deprivation of goods or services that are 

necessary to meet essential needs or to 

avoid physical or psychological harm. 

Exploitation .................. Section 102(24) of the Older Americans Act: 

‘‘Exploitation’’ of an older person is defined 

as the illegal or improper act or process of 

an individual, including a caregiver, using 

the resources of an older individual for 

monetary or personal benefit, profit, or gain.

‘‘Exploitation’’ is defined as the fraudulent or 

otherwise illegal, unauthorized, or improper 

act or process of an individual, including a 

caregiver or fiduciary, that uses the resources of an elder for monetary or personal 

benefit, profit, or gain, or that results in depriving an elder of rightful access to, or use 

of, benefits, resources, belongings, or assets. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
8 

PRESENT LAW AND COMMITTEE BILL: DEFINITIONS—Continued 

Term Present law Committee Bill 

Long-term care facility Section 102(32) of the Older Americans Act: 

‘‘Long term care facility’’ is defined as a 

skilled nursing facility as defined in Section 

1819(a) of the Social Security Act; any nursing facility as defined in Section 1919(a) of 

the Social Security Act; and for purposes of 

the title III and title VII provisions for elder 

abuse prevention, a board and care facility.

‘‘Long-term care facility’’ is defined as a residential care provider that arranges for, or 

directly provides, long-term care. 

Neglect ......................... Section 102(34) of the Older Americans Act: 

‘‘Neglect’’ is defined as the failure to provide for oneself the goods or services that 

are necessary to avoid physical harm, mental anguish, or mental illness; or the failure 

of a caregiver to provide the goods or services.

‘‘Neglect’’ is defined as the failure of a caregiver or fiduciary to provide the goods or 

services that are necessary to maintain the 

health or safety of an elder, or self-neglect. 

Criminal sexual abuse Title XVII of the Violent Crime Control and Enforcement Act: A ‘‘sexually violent offense’’

is defined as any criminal offense that consists of aggravated sexual abuse or sexual 

abuse (as defined by 18 U.S.C. Section 2241 

and 2242 or as defined by State law) or an 

offense that has as its elements engaging 

in physical contact with another person with 

intent to commit aggravated sexual abuse 

or sexual abuse.

‘‘Criminal sexual abuse’’ is defined as serious 

bodily injury that shall be considered to 

have occurred if the conduct causing the injury is conduct constituting aggravated sexual abuse under Section 2241, or sexual 

abuse under 18 U.S.C. or any similar offense under State law. 

General provisions 

(a) Protection of privacy 

PRESENT LAW

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 

(HIPAA), Section 264 governs the protection of individual health 

privacy. 

COMMITTEE BILL

The activities that would be carried out under this Part must ensure the protection of individual health privacy consistent with the 

regulations under Section 264(c) of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) and any State and 

local privacy regulations. 

(b) Rule of construction 

PRESENT LAW

No provision. 

COMMITTEE BILL

Includes a provision to accommodate religious beliefs in health 

care when determining whether there is abuse for data collection 

purposes. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
9 

PART A—NATIONAL COORDINATION OF ELDER JUSTICE ACTIVITIES

AND RESEARCH

Elder Justice Coordinating Council 

PRESENT LAW

No provision. 

COMMITTEE BILL

The bill would establish an Elder Justice Coordinating Council in 

the Office of the Secretary of HHS. 

Membership. The Council would be composed of the following 

members: the Secretary of HHS (or designee) who will chair the 

Council and the Attorney General (or designee). Membership would 

also include the head of each Federal department or agency having 

administrative responsibility for administering programs related to 

elder abuse, neglect, or exploitation. Members must be officers or 

employees of the Federal Government. 

Meetings. The Council is to meet at least twice a year. 

Duties and Reports. The Council would be required to make recommendations to the Secretary for the coordination of activities of 

the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of 

Justice, and other relevant Federal, State, local, and private agencies and entities, relating to elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation 

and other crimes against elders. The Council would be required to 

submit a report to Congress that describes its activities and challenges and make recommendations for legislation, model laws, and 

other actions deemed appropriate. The report is to be submitted to 

Congress within 2 years of enactment of the Elder Justice Act and 

every 2 years thereafter. 

Other Requirements. The Committee Bill also sets forth requirements for powers of the Council, vacancies in membership, travel 

expenses, and detail of Federal Government employees to the 

Council. 

Advisory Board on Elder Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation 

PRESENT LAW

No provision. 

COMMITTEE BILL

The bill would establish the Advisory Board on Elder Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation. 

Solicitation of Nominations, Membership, and Terms. The Secretary of HHS would be required to publish a notice in the Federal 

Register soliciting nominations for Advisory Board membership. 

The Board would be composed of 27 members appointed by the Secretary and must have experience and expertise in prevention of 

elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation. Each member would be appointed for a 3–year term, except for the first members of the 

Board whose terms would be staggered. 

Duties and Reports. The Board would be required to create a 

short and long-term multidisciplinary plan for development of the 

field of elder justice. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
10 

Within 18 months of the Committee Bill’s enactment and annually thereafter, the Advisory Board would be required to prepare 

and submit to the Elder Justice Coordinating Council and the appropriate committees of Congress, a report containing information 

on Federal, State, and local public and private elder justice activities. The report is also to contain recommendations on programs, 

research, services, practice, enforcement, and coordination among 

entities that carry out elder justice and other related activities; 

modifications needed in Federal and State laws, research, training, 

and national data collection; and on a multidisciplinary strategic 

plan to guide the field of elder justice. 

Other Requirements. The Committee Bill sets forth requirements 

relating to powers of the Board, vacancies, expired terms, election 

of officers, travel expenses, and detail of government employees to 

the Board. 

Research protections 

PRESENT LAW

Definition of Legally Authorized Representative. Subpart A of 

part 46 of title 45, Code of Federal Regulations, known as the Common Rule, that governs most federally-funded human subjects research, currently defines the term ‘‘legally authorized representative’’ as ‘‘an individual or judicial or other body authorized under 

applicable law to consent on behalf of a prospective subject to the 

subject’s participation in the procedure(s) involved in the research.’’

Researcher Guidelines. No guidelines are currently in place to assist researchers who work in the areas of elder abuse, neglect, and 

exploitation with issues relating to human subjects research. 

COMMITTEE BILL

The Bill would define ‘‘legally authorized representative,’’ for purposes of research under the proposed title XX, to mean, unless otherwise provided by law, the individual, or judicial or other body authorized under the applicable law to consent to medical treatment 

on behalf of another person.’’

It would also require the Secretary, acting through the Director 

of the National Institute on Aging (NIA), to promulgate guidelines 

to assist researchers working in the areas of elder abuse, neglect, 

and exploitation, with issues relating to human subjects research. 

Authorization of appropriations 

PRESENT LAW

No provision. 

COMMITTEE BILL

To carry out the functions under subtitle A (the Federal Elder 

Justice System), the Committee Bill authorizes $6.5 million for FY 

2007, and $7 million for each of FYs 2008–2010. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
11 

Subpart 2—Elder Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Forensic 

Centers 

Establishment and support of Elder Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Forensic Centers 

PRESENT LAW

No provision. 

COMMITTEE BILL

The Bill would require the Secretary, in consultation with the Attorney General, to award grants to eligible entities to establish and 

operate both stationary and mobile forensic centers and to develop 

forensic expertise pertaining to elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation. With respect to the stationary forensic centers, the Committee Bill would require the Secretary to make four grants to 

higher education institutions with demonstrated expertise in 

forensics or commitment to preventing or treating elder abuse, neglect, or exploitation; and with respect to mobile forensic centers, 

the Committee Bill would require the Secretary to make six grants 

to appropriate entities. 

Funding would be authorized for the centers to: (1) develop forensic markers that would determine whether abuse or neglect occurred and whether a crime was committed, and determine methodologies for how and when intervention should occur; (2) develop 

forensic expertise with respect to elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation in order to provide relevant evaluation, intervention, support 

and advocacy, case review and tracking; and (3) in coordination 

with the Attorney General, use data made available by grant recipients under this section to develop the capacity of geriatric 

health care professionals and law enforcement to collect forensic 

evidence, including forensic evidence relating to a potential determination of elder abuse, neglect, or exploitation. The Committee 

Bill would also require the Secretary, in consultation with the Attorney General, to use data to develop the capacity to collect forensic evidence. 

The Committee Bill would authorize $4 million in funding for FY 

2007, $6 million for FY 2008, and $8 million for each of FYs 2009–

2010. 

PART B—PROGRAMS TO PROMOTE ELDER JUSTICE

Enhancement of long-term care 

PRESENT LAW

Nursing homes that receive Federal funds are required to meet 

certain Federal laws and standards to receive funding. These laws 

require nursing aides, who work on a full-time basis for more than 

4 months, to complete a training and/or competency evaluation program and be competent to provide care. Nursing homes must also 

provide regular performance reviews and in-service education (including training for individuals providing nursing and nursing-related services to residents with cognitive impairments) to assure 

that nursing aides are competent to perform services. Regulations 

also require nursing aides to complete a training program lasting 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
12 

no less than 75 clock hours of training, at least 16 of which must 

be supervised practical training, in order to be certified. 

A number of States have also used enhanced Medicaid funding 

to improve recruitment and retention of nursing aides working in 

nursing homes. For these States, some portion of an increase in 

State Medicaid payments (and other public funding sources) to 

long-term care providers must be (or intended to be) used to increase wages and or benefits for nursing aides. Typically, this 

‘‘wage pass-though’’ legislation has either designated some specified dollar amount (e.g., $.50 or $1.00) or a certain percentage of increased State payments to be used for wages and or benefits. 

Nursing Home Compare is a website hosted by the Department 

of Health and Human Services that allows consumers to search for 

data on certain quality indicators for nursing homes certified to 

participate in Medicare and/or Medicaid across the country. The information reported on this site includes selected findings of the 

Survey and Certification surveys conducted by State Survey agencies during the three most recent inspections and complaint investigations. Specifically, the website contains data on the Federal 

regulatory requirements that the nursing home failed to meet as 

reported on form HCFA–2567. There is currently no requirement 

that information about the adjudication of criminal violations be reported on this website. 

COMMITTEE BILL

The Bill would require the Secretary of HHS to carry out activities that provide incentives for individuals to train for, seek, and 

maintain employment providing direct care in long-term care facilities. 

Coordination of Federal Agencies to Train Long-Term Care Staff. 

The Secretary of HHS would be required to coordinate activities 

with the Secretary of Labor and the Assistant Secretary of ACF to 

provide incentives to welfare-to-work and TANF recipients to train 

for and seek employment as direct care providers in long-term care 

facilities. 

Career Ladders, Wage and Benefit Grants. The Secretary of HHS 

would be required to award grants to long-term care facilities to 

conduct programs that offer direct care employees continuing training and varying levels of certification. Grants would also be used 

to provide for or make arrangements with employers to pay bonuses, or other increased compensation or benefits, to employees 

who obtain certification. To receive grant funds, long-term care facilities would submit applications directly to the Secretary. 

Management Improvement. The Secretary of HHS would be required to award grants to long-term care facilities for training and 

technical assistance. Eligible recipients could include administrators, directors of nursing, staff developers, charge nurses, and others who establish or implement management practices for direct 

care employees. Training and technical assistance would be intended to promote retention and could include: (1) the establishment of human resource policies rewarding high performance, including policies that provide for improved wages and benefits on 

the basis of job reviews; (2) the establishment of motivational organizational practices; (3) the creation of a workplace culture that respects and values caregivers and their needs; (4) the promotion of 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
13 

a workplace culture that respects the rights of residents and results in improvements in their care; and (5) the establishment of 

other programs that promote high quality care, such as continuing 

education for certified nursing aide employees. Long-term care facilities would submit applications to the Administrator to qualify 

for grant funds. The Secretary would be required to develop accountability measures to ensure that funded activities under this 

title benefit eligible employees and increase the stability of the 

long-term care workforce. 

Informatics Systems Grant Program. The Secretary is authorized 

to make grants to long-term care facilities for the purpose of assisting such entities in off-setting the costs related to purchasing, leasing, developing, and implementing standardized clinical health care 

informatics systems designed to improve patient safety and reduce 

adverse events and health care complications resulting from medication errors. 

Inclusion of Certain Crimes on Nursing Home Compare Website. 

The Secretary is required to ensure that information relating to the 

number of criminal convictions by nursing facilities or by an employee of a nursing facility are part of the information provided for 

comparison of nursing facilities on the official Internet website of 

the Federal Government for medicare beneficiaries. 

Consumer Rights Information Page on Nursing Home Compare 

Website. The Secretary shall ensure that the Nursing Home Compare Medicare website develops and includes a consumer rights information page that includes documentation on available nursing 

facilities, consumer rights, the survey process, and services available through the State long-term care ombudsman. 

Standards Involving Clinical Data by Long-Term Care Facilities. 

The Secretary shall develop and adopt uniform open electronic 

standards for transactions involving clinical data by long-term care 

facilities. 

The Committee bill would authorize $20 million for FY 2007, 

$17.5 million for FY 2008, and $15 million for FY 2009 and FY 

2010. 

Adult protective services functions and grant programs 

Adult protective services—Functions 

PRESENT LAW

Provisions related to some functions of adult protective services 

are found in title XX of the Social Security Act (Social Services 

Block Grant) (administered by the Administration on Children and 

Families (ACF)) and the Older Americans Act (administered by 

AoA), both in DHHS, as follows. 

Title XX of the Social Security Act. Title XX provides funds to 

States to carry out a wide range of social services on behalf of various groups. The statute sets out a number of goals for the use of 

these funds, including the goal of ‘‘preventing or remedying neglect, 

abuse, or exploitation of children and adults unable to protect their 

own interests. . . .’’

Funds are generally administered by State social services or 

human services agencies (for this purpose, sometimes referred to as 

adult protective services offices), and/or State agencies on aging. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
14 

1 A percentage of expenditures differs from a percentage of the title XX appropriation. Title 

XX expenditures include spending from funds transferred from the Temporary Assistance for 

Needy Families (TANF) program to title XX. 

No match is required for Federal title XX funds, and Federal law 

does not specify a sub-State allocation formula. In other words, 

States have complete discretion for the distribution of funds within 

their borders. Based on the 2002 Annual Report for the Social 

Services Block Grant, 34 States used some portion of title XX funds 

for adult protective services, and approximately 425,000 adults received adult protective services that were funded in whole or in 

part with title XX funds. Of all State expenditures under title XX 

for 2002, 5.8 percent were for protective services for adults.1

Older Americans Act. Title II of the Older Americans Act requires the Assistant Secretary on Aging in DHHS to establish a 

National Center on Elder Abuse. The Center is required to, among 

other things, compile, publish and disseminate research and training materials on prevention of elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation; maintain a clearinghouse on programs showing promise in 

preventing elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation; conduct research 

and demonstration projects that identify causes, prevention, and 

treatment; and provide technical assistance to State agencies and 

other organizations in planning and improving prevention programs. AoA awards funds to six organizations that share the funds: 

the National Association of State Units on Aging, which administers the Center, in cooperation with the National Protective Services Association; the National Committee for the Prevention of 

Elder Abuse; the American Bar Association; and the Clearinghouse 

on Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation. Funding history for the Center is as follows: FY 1998, $250,000; FY 1999, $200,000; FY 2000, $815,250; FY 2001, $815,000; FY 

2002, $815,000, and FY 2003, $815,000. The 2000 amendments to 

the Act required that the Center receive at least the same amount 

of funds as it received in FY 2000. 

Title III of the Older Americans Act authorizes, but does not require, State agencies on aging to conduct various activities related 

to prevention of elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation. No Federal 

funds are separately allotted for this purpose under title III, and 

States decide how much of their title III allotments are to be used 

for prevention activities. In many States, State agencies on aging 

administer funds for adult protective services funded under title 

XX of the Social Security Act (described below). 

Title VII of the Older Americans Act authorizes a program of 

grants to States to carry out activities related to prevention of elder 

abuse, neglect, and exploitation. Funds are administered by State 

agencies on aging. In FY 2006, the appropriation level for this program under title VII is $5.2 million. 

Section 1128E of the Social Security Act requires the Secretary 

to maintain a national health care fraud and abuse data collection 

program for the reporting of final adverse actions (not including 

settlements in which no findings of liability have been made), including health care related civil judgments and criminal convictions of health care practitioners, providers, and suppliers. The 

database is directed by HHS, acting through the office of the Attorney General, and is named the Healthcare Integrity and Protection 

Data Bank (HIPDB). 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
15 

For the purposes of this database, Medicaid regulation 42 CFR 

§ 455.12 requires that State agencies report the number of complaints of fraud and abuse made to the agency that warrant preliminary investigation. For each case, reports should include the 

provider’s name and number; the source of the complaint; the type 

of provider; the nature of the complaint; the approximate range of 

dollars involved; and the legal and administrative disposition of the 

case, including actions taken by law enforcement officials to whom 

the case has been referred. Section 1128E requires the Secretary 

to include procedures assuring that the privacy of individuals receiving health care services is appropriately protected. 

The Secretary makes available the information in the database 

to government agencies and health plans and, upon request, to 

health care providers, suppliers, and practitioners who wish to selfquery. The Secretary may establish or approve fees sufficient to recover the full costs of the databases’ operation. 

According to Section 1128E(g)(1)(A) of the Social Security Act, a 

final adverse action includes: (1) civil judgments related to the delivery of a health care item or service that are against a health 

care provider or practitioner in Federal or State court; (2) Federal 

or State criminal convictions related to the delivery of health care; 

(3) certain actions by Federal or State agencies responsible for the 

licensing and certification of providers and licensed practitioners; 

(4) prohibition against participating in Federal or State health care 

programs; or (5) any other adjudicated actions or decisions established by the Secretary under regulation. Medicaid regulation 42 

CFR § 483.374 also requires facilities to report each serious occurrence to both the State Medicaid agency and, unless prohibited by 

State law, the State-designated protection and advocacy system. 

COMMITTEE BILL

The Bill would establish certain functions with respect to Adult 

Protective Services (APS) to be administered by the Secretary. 

Adult Protective Services—Functions. Functions include providing 

funding and support to State and local adult protective services offices that investigate reports of abuse, neglect and exploitation of 

elders and vulnerable adults; collecting and disseminating information on abuse in coordination with the Department of Justice; developing and disseminating information on best practices; conducting research and providing technical assistance to States that 

provide or fund protective services; and reporting crimes on the 

Nursing Home Compare website. 

To carry out these functions, the Committee Bill authorizes $3 

million for FY 2007 and $4 million for each of FYs 2008–2010. 

Adult protective service grant program (State formula grants) 

PRESENT LAW

No provision in current law for State formula grants that are 

solely and specifically targeted at providing adult protective services and carrying out projects to employ workers having caseloads 

of elders alone. 

Some other legislation is related to adult protective services, as 

follows. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
16 

Title XX of the Social Security Act. Title XX provides funds to 

States to carry out a wide range of social services on behalf of various groups. The statute sets out a number of goals for the use of 

these funds, including the goal of ‘‘preventing or remedying neglect, 

abuse, or exploitation of children and adults unable to protect their 

own interests....’’ Funds are generally administered by State social 

services or human services agencies (for this purpose, sometimes 

referred to as adult protective services offices), and/or State agencies on aging. 

Title III of the Older Americans Act authorizes, but does not require, State agencies on aging to conduct various activities related 

to prevention of elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation, which may 

include adult protective services. No Federal funds are separately 

appropriated for this purpose under title III, and States decide how 

much of their title III allotments are to be used for these activities. 

In many States, State agencies on aging administer funds for adult 

protective services funded under title XX of the Social Security Act 

(described below). 

Title VII of the Older Americans Act authorizes a program of 

grants to States to carry out activities related to prevention of elder 

abuse, neglect, and exploitation. Funds are administered by State 

agencies on aging. In FY 2006, the appropriation level for this program under title VII is $5.2 million. 

COMMITTEE BILL

The Bill provides for grants to improve Adult Protective Services. 

Grants to Improve Worker Caseloads for Adult Protective Services. The Secretary would be required to award annual grants to 

enhance adult protective service programs provided by States and 

local governments. 

Formula for Distribution of Funds. Distribution of funds to 

States would be based on a formula that takes into account the 

number of elders (people age 60 or older) residing in a State relative to the total U.S. population of elders. States would receive no 

less than 0.75 percent of the grant program’s annual appropriation. 

The District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, 

Guam, and American Samoa would receive no less than 0.1 percent 

of the annual appropriation. In order to comply with these minimum amount requirements, the Secretary is required to make pro 

rata reductions in amounts to be allotted. 

Use of Funds. Funds may be used only by States and local governments to provide adult protective services. States receiving 

funds would be required to provide these funds to the agency or 

unit of State government having legal responsibility for providing 

adult protective services in the State. Each State would be required 

to use these funds to supplement and not supplant other Federal, 

State, and local public funds expended to provide adult protective 

services. 

Reports. Each State would be required to submit a report to the 

Secretary on the number of elders served by the grants. The Secretary would be required to submit to the appropriate congressional 

committees a report compiling, summarizing, and analyzing the 

State reports. 

The Committee Bill would authorize $100 million for each of FYs 

2007–2010. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
17 

State adult protective service grants (Demonstration program) 

PRESENT LAW

No provision in current law specifically authorizes a dedicated 

amount of funds for State adult protective service demonstration 

programs. However, the Older American Act authorizes a related 

demonstration program (as follows), but no specific authorization is 

specified by law. 

Section 413 of the Older Americans Act, Older Individuals’ Protection from Violence Projects, requires the Assistant Secretary to 

award funds to States’ area agencies on aging, and nonprofit organizations, or tribal organizations, to carry out a wide range of 

projects related to protection of older persons from violence. Funds 

are to be used to: support local communities to coordinate activities 

regarding intervention in and prevention of abuse, neglect, and exploitation; develop outreach to assist victims; expand access to family violence and sexual assault programs (including shelters, rape 

crisis centers, and support groups) as well as mental health services, safety planning and other services; and promote research on 

legal organization and training impediments to providing services 

through shelters and other programs. 

COMMITTEE BILL

The Bill would require the Secretary to establish grants to States 

for adult protective service demonstration programs. Funds may be 

used by State and local units of government to conduct demonstration programs that test: training modules developed for the purpose 

of detecting or preventing elder abuse; methods to detect or prevent 

financial exploitation and elder abuse; whether training on elder 

abuse forensics enhances the detection of abuse by employees of 

State or local government; and other related matters. States would 

be required to submit applications to the Secretary. 

Each State receiving funds would be required to submit a report 

on the demonstration to the Secretary. The Secretary would be required to submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report compiling, summarizing, and analyzing the State reports, as 

well making recommendations for appropriate legislative or administrative action. 

The Committee Bill would authorize $25 million for each of FYs 

2007–2010. 

Long-Term Care Ombudsman program grants and training 

PRESENT LAW

Title II of the Older Americans Act requires the Assistant Secretary on Aging to establish the National Ombudsman Resource 

Center under the Director of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman program. The Center is required to, through grants and contracts, conduct research and provide training, technical assistance, and information to State long-term care ombudsmen; and to assist State 

long-term care ombudsmen in the implementation of the State 

long-term care ombudsman program. Funds awarded to the Center 

are not separately authorized, but are not to be less than the 

amount made available to the Center for FY 2000. Funds for the 

Center are awarded through title IV of the Older Americans Act 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
18 

(Research, Training, and Demonstration Projects and Programs). 

The State long-term care ombudsman program is authorized by 

title VII of the Act (Allotments for Vulnerable Elder Rights Protection Activities). 

COMMITTEE BILL

The Committee Bill requires the Secretary to provide grants to 

improve the capacity of ombudsman programs to respond to and resolve complaints about abuse and neglect; conduct pilot programs; 

provide support for the resource center; and improve training. This 

provision is authorized at $5 million for FY 2007, $7.5 million for 

FY 2008, and $10 million for FY 2009 and FY 2010. 

The Secretary shall establish programs to provide and improve 

ombudsman training with respect to elder abuse, neglect and exploitation for national organizations and State long-term care ombudsman programs. These programs are authorized at $10 million 

for each of the fiscal years FY 2007 through FY 2010. 

PART C—COLLECTION OF DATA, DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION

AND STUDIES

Collection of uniform national data on elder abuse, neglect and exploitation 

PRESENT LAW

No provision that establishes an ongoing, uniform national data 

collection process or provides grants to States to assist with data 

collection. 

A related law, the Family Violence Prevention and Services Act 

of 1992 (P.L. 102–295), required HHS to conduct a study of the national incidence of abuse, neglect, and exploitation of elderly persons. This study, referred to as ‘‘the National Elder Abuse Incidence Study,’’ used a nationally-representative sample of 20 counties in 15 States and combined local Adult Protective Services 

(APS) reports with reports from other community service agencies 

to estimate the number of new elder abuse and neglect cases over 

a given period. The final report for this study was released by HHS 

in 1998. 

In addition to the study described above, the Federal Government has periodically surveyed State APS units over the last 20 

years on the prevalence of elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation. In 

these surveys, there was significant variation among the States in 

the definitions used and the comprehensiveness of data collected. 

This variation has created challenges in establishing a national 

data set and identifying trends in abuse, neglect, and exploitation. 

COMMITTEE BILL

The Bill would establish as the purpose of the section the improvement, streamlining, and promotion of uniform collection, 

maintenance, and dissemination of national data regarding elder 

abuse, neglect, and exploitation. The activities of the Secretary 

would be carried out in three phases. 

The Secretary would be required to develop, under Phase I, a 

method for collecting national data regarding elder abuse, neglect, 

and exploitation and uniform national data reporting forms adaptVerDate Aug 31 2005 21:37 Sep 22, 2006 Jkt 004910 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\SR337.XXX SR337

hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
19 

ed to each relevant entity or discipline (e.g., health, public safety, 

social and protective services, and law enforcement). The Secretary 

would be required to consult with the Attorney General to develop 

this method for national data collection. The national data reporting forms must include the definitions of title XX for determining 

whether an event will be reportable. Finally, the activities that 

would be carried out under this section must ensure the protection 

of individual health privacy consistent with the regulations under 

Section 264 of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability 

Act of 1996 (HIPAA) and any State and local privacy regulations. 

Phase I must occur no later than 1 year after the date of enactment. 

Phase II would require the Secretary to ensure that the national 

data reporting forms and data collection methods (developed under 

Phase I) would be pilot tested in six States selected by the Secretary. After pilot testing the data collection efforts, the Secretary 

must review the findings, consult with the Attorney General and 

other relevant experts, and adjust the national data reporting 

forms and data collection methods as necessary. Phase II must 

occur no later than 1 year following the completion of activities 

under Phase I. 

Phase III would require the Secretary to submit the national 

data reporting forms and instructions to: (1) the heads of the relevant Federal entities as may be appropriate, and (2) the Governor’s office of each State for collection from all relevant State entities of data including health care, social services, and law enforcement data. 

In Phase III, the Secretary would be authorized to award grants 

to States to improve data collection activities relating to elder 

abuse, neglect, and exploitation. Each State that wants to apply for 

a grant must submit an application to the Administrator following 

the prescribed requirements. Each State receiving a grant in a fiscal year would be required to submit data for the calendar year 

that begins during that year using the national data forms. 

The amount of each grant to a State must be distributed using 

the following method: For the first fiscal year in which a State receives grant funds, the Secretary would be required to initially distribute 50 percent of those funds. The remaining funds are to be 

distributed at the end of the calendar year that begins during that 

fiscal year if the Secretary determines that the State has properly 

reported data required under this section for the calendar year. For 

subsequent years, the Secretary would be required to distribute 

grant funds to a State for a fiscal year if the State properly reported required data for the calendar year that ends during that 

fiscal year. The reports submitted by States must indicate the 

State and year in which the event occurred and identify the total 

number of events that occurred in each State during the year and 

the type of event. 

The Secretary would be required to submit a report no later than 

1 year after the enactment date regarding the activities required 

by this section to Congress, including the Senate Committee on Finance and the House Committee on Ways and Means, and the 

House Committee on Energy and Commerce. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
20 

To carry out the activities of this section, the Committee Bill 

would authorize $10 million for FY 2007, $30 million for FY 2008, 

and $100 million for each of FYs 2009 and 2010. 

Long-term care consumer clearinghouse 

PRESENT LAW

No provision requiring establishment of a long-term care consumer clearinghouse. 

In related activities, DHHS has funded some States to establish 

State-based consumer-friendly access to information about longterm care services. In FY 2003 through FY 2006, the Centers for 

Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and AoA awarded approximately $18 million in grants to States for the purpose of assisting 

States in their efforts to create a single, coordinated system of information and access for all persons seeking long-term care to minimize confusion, enhance individual choice, and support informed 

decision-making. A total of 24 States have received grants for this 

purpose. Some of the common activities under this grant program 

include information and referral, outreach, counseling about public 

benefits and long-term care options, and case management. States’

methods for implementing the grant may vary; some States have 

established an actual physical location, and other States have established a State-wide clearinghouse through a toll-free number or 

a web-based information site. 

In addition, CMS has made available to the public, via its 

website, a comparison of Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing 

homes and home health agencies. The information provides detailed facility and agency information and characteristics, and contains several measures of quality (e.g., improvement in mobility). 

This website does not cover assisted living facilities, group homes 

and other residential facilities that are not nursing facilities; nor 

does it cover non-medical, non-certified, home- and communitybased long-term care services. 

COMMITTEE BILL

The Bill would require the Secretary to establish a long-term 

care consumer clearinghouse which must provide comprehensive 

detailed information, in a consumer-friendly form, to consumers 

about choices relating to long-term care providers. 

The clearinghouse is to include information about obtaining the 

services of, and employing, caregivers; options for residential longterm care (e.g., the type of care provided by nursing facilities, and 

the type of care provided by group homes and other residential facilities); benefits available through the Federal health care programs; and links to Federal and State websites that describe the 

care available through specific long-term care facilities including 

information about the satisfaction of those residents and their families with the care provided. The clearinghouse must also provide 

information (from States and other sources) on long-term care providers, including assisted living facilities, board and care facilities, 

congregate care facilities, home health care providers, and other 

long-term care providers. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
21 

To carry out the activities of this section, the Committee Bill 

would authorize $2 million for FY 2007, $3 million for FY 2008, 

and $4 million for each of FYs 2009 and 2010. 

Consumer information about the continuum of residential long-term 

care facilities 

PRESENT LAW

No provision. 

COMMITTEE BILL

The Bill would require the Secretary, in consultation with the Attorney General, to conduct a study on consumer concerns relating 

to residential long-term care facilities other than nursing facilities. 

The study may be carried out either directly or through a grant. 

The organization conducting the study must develop definitions for 

classes of residential long-term care facilities and collect information on the following features of these facilities: prices, level of 

services, oversight and enforcement provisions, and admission and 

discharge criteria. 

The Secretary would be required to prepare a report containing 

the results of the study and submit the report to the appropriate 

committees. 

To carry out the study, the Committee Bill would authorize $3 

million for each of FYs 2007–2010. 

Evaluations of elder justice programs 

PRESENT LAW

No provision. 

COMMITTEE BILL

The Bill would require the Secretary of HHS to reserve a portion 

of the funds appropriated in each program under title XX to be 

used to provide assistance to eligible entities to conduct validated 

evaluations of the effectiveness of the activities funded under each 

program under title XX. To be eligible to receive these funds, an 

eligible entity must submit an application to the Secretary following the timing and requirements prescribed by the Secretary, 

including a proposal for the evaluation. 

Entities would be required to submit to the Secretary and appropriate congressional committees a report containing the results of 

the evaluation together with any recommendations deemed appropriate. The report would be due by the date specified by the Secretary. 

Report 

PRESENT LAW

Currently, no provision exists concerning Federal agency coordination to encourage the employment of welfare recipients or recipients of Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) in longterm care facilities. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
22 

COMMITTEE BILL

The Committee Bill requires, not later than October 1, 2011, a 

report from the Secretary to the Elder Justice Coordinating Council 

and appropriate committees, summarizing: (1) State reports submitted under section 2042; (2) results of the study under section 

2053; (3) recommendations for legislative or administrative action; 

and (4) a requirement for State plans under the program for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families. 

Amendments to Part A, Title XI of the Social Security Act—Longterm care facilities 

PRESENT LAW

No Federal provisions for mandatory reporting of crimes in federally funded long-term care facilities. There are some Federal laws 

and regulations under Medicare and Medicaid in the event that a 

facility participating in either of those programs closes. 

Reporting. Based on a 2000 survey of State Adult Protective 

Services systems, all States had elder/adult abuse reporting laws. 

State laws varied in who was a mandated reporter and who was 

encouraged to report incidents of elder/adult abuse. Many States 

and territories named health care professionals, such as nurses, 

physicians and nursing aides, as mandated reporters of elder/adult 

abuse. Five States did not list anyone as a mandated reporter. 

Eleven States reported that there were no statutory consequences for failure of mandated reporters to report abuse; the remaining States and the District of Columbia and Guam had a specified consequence. The most common consequence for failing to report was a misdemeanor with a possible fine and/or jail sentence. 

State law also varied with regard to specifying a time frame within 

which reporters were required to report suspicion of abuse. Nineteen States had no time frame. Of those that specified a time 

frame, the requirements varied from immediately to more than 4 

days. 

Notification of Facility Closure. If a long-term care facility that 

receives Federal funds through participation in Medicare or Medicaid closes, current Federal laws and regulations provide some 

guidance on the parties that need to be notified and the process for 

relocating residents. If a facility wants to terminate its status as 

a Medicare provider (for example, due to facility closure), the facility must notify both CMS and the public no later than 15 days in 

advance of the proposed termination date. If a facility wants to terminate its status as a Medicaid provider, Federal regulations do 

not specify a timeframe for notifying Federal or State agencies; 

however, the facility is required to notify Medicaid residents at 

least 30 days before transferring or discharging him or her. Facility 

closure is one circumstance in which a resident would need to be 

transferred. 

The State Medicaid agency has the primary responsibility for relocating Medicaid patients and for ensuring their safe and orderly 

transfer from a facility that no longer participates in Medicaid to 

a participating facility that meets acceptable standards. CMS has 

provided guidance to States concerning relocating patients. Each 

State is expected to have a plan that describes the relocation of patients. Additionally, the notice to residents is to include informaVerDate Aug 31 2005 21:37 Sep 22, 2006 Jkt 004910 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\SR337.XXX SR337

hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
23 

tion as to how to contact the ombudsman established by the Older 

Americans Act. 

COMMITTEE BILL

Reporting of Crimes in Federally Funded Facilities. The Committee Bill would require reporting to law enforcement of crimes 

occurring in federally funded long-term care facilities that receive 

at least $10,000 in Federal funds during the preceding year. The 

owner or operator of these facilities would be required to annually 

notify each individual who is an owner, operator, employee, manager, agent, or contractor of a long-term care facility that they are 

required to report any reasonable suspicion of a crime against any 

person who is a resident of or receiving care from the facility. 

These individuals are referred to in this section as ‘‘covered individuals.’’ Suspected crimes must be reported to the Secretary and one 

or more law enforcement entities for the political subdivision in 

which the facility is located. 

Timing of Reporting. If the events that cause the suspicion of a 

crime result in serious bodily injury, the covered individual must 

report the suspicion immediately, but not later than 2 hours after 

forming the suspicion. If the events that cause the suspicion do not 

result in serious bodily injury, the individual must report the suspicion not later than 24 hours after forming the suspicion. 

Penalties for Non-Reporting. If a covered individual does not report suspicion of a crime within the timeframe described above, the 

individual will be subject to a civil money penalty of up to 

$200,000, or the Secretary shall classify the individual as an ‘‘excluded individual’’ (i.e., any employer of the individual is unable to 

receive Federal funds) for a period of not more than 3 years. If a 

covered individual does not report suspicion of a crime within the 

timeframe described above and this violation exacerbates the harm 

to the victim, or results in harm to another person, the individual 

will be subject to a civil money penalty of up to $300,000, and the 

Secretary shall classify the individual as an ‘‘excluded individual’’ (i.e., any employer of the individual is unable to receive Federal 

funds) for a period of not more than 3 years. 

If an individual is classified as an ‘‘excluded individual,’’ any entity that employs that individual will not be eligible to receive Federal funds. The Secretary may take into account the financial burden on providers with underserved populations in determining any 

penalty to be imposed under this section. Underserved populations 

are defined as the population of an area designated by the Secretary as an area or population group with a shortage of elder justice programs. These may include those that are geographically isolated, racial and ethnic minority populations, and populations underserved because of special needs (such as language barriers, disabilities, alien status, or age). 

Additional Penalties for Retaliation. A long-term care facility 

may not retaliate against an employee for making a report, causing 

a report to be made, or for taking steps to make a report. Retaliation includes discharge, demotion, suspension, threats, harassment, 

denial of a promotion or other employment-related benefit, or any 

other manner of discrimination against an employee in the terms 

and conditions of employment because of lawful acts done by the 

employee. Long-term care facilities may also not retaliate against 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
24 

a nurse by filing a complaint or report with the appropriate State 

professional disciplinary agency because of lawful acts done by the 

nurse. 

If a long-term care facility does retaliate, it shall be subject to 

a civil money penalty of up to $200,000 or the Secretary may exclude it from participation in any Federal health care program for 

a period of 2 years. 

Notice to Employees. Each long-term care facility must post conspicuously, in an appropriate location, a sign specifying rights of 

employees under this section. The sign shall include a statement 

that an employee may file a complaint against a long-term care facility that violates the provisions of this section with the Secretary. 

The notice must also contain information as to how to file a complaint. 

Notification of Public Agencies and Safety of Residents in the 

Event of Facility Closure. In addition, if a long-term care facility 

(that received at least $10,000 in Federal funds during the previous 

year) is going to close, the owner or operator of the facility must 

submit to the Secretary and the appropriate State regulatory agency written notification of an impending closure within 60 days prior 

to the closure date. In the notice, the owner or operator must include a plan for transfer and adequate relocation of residents, including assurances that residents will be moved to the most appropriate facility in terms of quality, services, and location. Within 10 

days after the facility closes, the owner or operator of the facility 

must submit to the Secretary, and the appropriate State agency, 

information on where the residents were transferred to and when. 

Anyone who owns a skilled nursing facility that fails to comply 

with the notification of closure and reporting requirements shall be 

subject to a civil monetary penalty of up to $1,000,000, exclusion 

from participation in the programs under the Social Security Act, 

and any other civil monetary penalties and assessments. 

A civil monetary penalty or assessment will be imposed in the 

same manner as a civil monetary penalty, assessment or exclusion 

under Section 1128A of the Social Security Act. 

Amendments to Part A, Title XI of the Social Security Act—National nursing aide registry study and report 

PRESENT LAW

Section 1819(b)(5)(F) (Medicare law) and 1919(b)(5)(F) (Medicaid 

law) of the Social Security Act define nursing aides as individuals 

providing nursing or nursing-related services to residents in nursing facilities as well as registered dieticians or persons who volunteer to provide such services without monetary compensation. 

Nursing aides do not include physicians; physician assistants; 

nurse practitioners; physical, speech, or occupational therapists; 

physical or occupational therapy assistants; registered professional 

nurses; licensed practical nurses; or licensed certified social workers. For Medicare-certified facilities, nursing aides also exclude registered respiratory therapists or certified respiratory therapy technicians. 

No present law exists concerning a nursing aide registry study. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
25 

COMMITTEE BILL

The Secretary shall conduct a study on establishing a national 

nursing aide registry that shall include an evaluation of who 

should be included in the registry; how the registry would comply 

with Federal and State privacy laws and regulations; how data 

would be collected for the registry; what entities and individuals 

would have access to the data collected; how the registry would 

provide appropriate information regarding violations of Federal and 

State law by individuals included in the registry; how the functions 

of the registry would be coordinated with the pilot program for national and State background checks on direct care patient access 

employees of long-term care facilities; and how the information in 

State nursing aide registries would be maintained in a national 

registry. 

After receiving the report submitted to Secretary, the Committee 

on Ways and Means and the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Finance of 

the Senate shall, as they deem appropriate, take action based on 

the recommendations contained in the report. 

Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, 

the Secretary shall submit a report to the Elder Justice Coordinating Council, the Committee on Ways and Means and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives 

and the Committee on Finance of the Senate containing the findings and recommendations of the study. Funding for the study 

shall not exceed $500,000. 

III. REGULATORY IMPACT AND OTHER MATTERS 

A. REGULATORY IMPACT

Pursuant to paragraph 11(b) of rule XXVI of the Standing Rules 

of the Senate, the Committee makes the following statement concerning the regulatory impact that might be incurred in carrying 

out the provisions of the bill as amended. 

Impact on individuals and businesses 

The provisions of the bill are not expected to impose additional 

administrative requirements or regulatory burdens on individuals 

or businesses. 

B. UNFUNDED MANDATES STATEMENT

Impact on personal privacy and paperwork 

The provisions of the bill do not reduce personal privacy. 

This information is provided in accordance with section 423 of 

the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (P.L. 104–4). 

The Committee has determined that the provisions of the bill 

contain no Federal private sector mandates. 

The Committee has determined that the provisions of the bill do 

not impose a Federal intergovernmental mandate on State, local, or 

tribal governments. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
26 

IV. COST ESTIMATE 

U.S. CONGRESS, 

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE, 

Washington, DC, September 8, 2006. 

Hon. CHARLES E. GRASSLEY, 

Chairman, Committee on Finance, 

U.S. Senate, Washington, DC. 

DEAR MR. CHAIRMAN: The Congressional Budget Office has prepared the enclosed cost estimate for S. 2010, the Elder Justice Act. 

If you wish further details on this estimate, we will be pleased 

to provide them. The CBO staff contact is Christina Hawley Anthony. 

Sincerely, 

DONALD B. MARRON, 

Acting Director. 

Enclosure. 

S. 2010—Elder Justice Act 

Summary: S. 2010 would amend Title XX of the Social Security 

Act by creating a new subtitle dealing with elder justice issues. The 

bill would authorize appropriations totaling $974 million over the 

2007–2011 period for grants and other activities authorized in the 

new subtitle. Assuming appropriation of the authorized amounts, 

CBO estimates the bill would result in additional outlays of $32 

million in 2007 and $894 million over the 2007–2011 period. Enacting the bill would not affect direct spending. CBO estimates that 

the civil monetary penalties authorized by the bill would have a 

negligible effect on revenues. 

S. 2010 contains no intergovernmental or private-sector mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA). 

The bill would benefit state, local, and tribal governments and any 

costs they incur would result from complying with conditions of federal assistance. 

Estimated cost to the Federal Government: The estimated budgetary impact of is shown in the following table. The costs of this 

legislation fall within budget function 500 (education, employment, 

training, and social services). 

Basis of estimate: The bill would amend Title XX of the Social 

Security Act to create a new subtitle for ‘‘Elder Justice’’ that would 

authorize programs aimed at providing legal protection and services to older individuals. S. 2010 would authorize discretionary appropriations totaling $189 million in 2007 and $974 million over 

the 2007–2011 period for administrative activities and grants. Assuming appropriation of the authorized amounts, CBO estimates 

that enacting the bill would increase outlays by $32 million in 2007 

and by $894 million from 2007 to 2011. For this estimate, CBO assumes the bill will be enacted early in fiscal year 2007, that the 

authorized amounts are appropriated for each year, and that outlays will follow historical spending patterns of similar programs. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
27 

By fiscal year, in millions of dollars—

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 

CHANGES IN SPENDING SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATION 

Part A: National Coordination of Elder Justice Activities and Research 

Coordination of Elder Justice Activities: 

Authorization Level ..................................................................... 7 7 7 7 0 

Estimated Outlays ...................................................................... 4 7 7 7 3 

Forensic Centers: 

Authorization Level ..................................................................... 4 6 8 8 0 

Estimated Outlays ...................................................................... 2 5 7 8 4 

Part B: Programs to Promote Elder Justice 

Grants and Incentives for Long-Term Care: 

Authorization Level ..................................................................... 20 18 15 15 0 

Estimated Outlays ...................................................................... 2 12 16 16 14 

Secretarial Responsibilities: 

Authorization Level ..................................................................... 3 4 4 4 0 

Estimated Outlays ...................................................................... 2 4 4 4 1 

Adult Protective Services Grant Programs: 

Authorization Level ..................................................................... 100 100 100 100 0 

Estimated Outlays ...................................................................... 10 60 90 100 90 

Adult Protective Services Demonstrations: 

Authorization Level ..................................................................... 25 25 25 25 0 

Estimated Outlays ...................................................................... 3 15 23 25 23 

Long-Term Care Ombudsman Grants: 

Authorization Level ..................................................................... 5 8 10 10 0 

Estimated Outlays ...................................................................... 1 3 6 9 9 

Ombudsman Training: 

Authorization Level ..................................................................... 10 10 10 10 0 

Estimated Outlays ...................................................................... 1 6 9 10 9 

Part C: Collection of Data, Dissemination of Information, and Studies 

Data Collection: 

Authorization Level ..................................................................... 10 30 100 100 0 

Estimated Outlays ...................................................................... 5 20 65 100 50 

Long-Term Care Clearinghouse: 

Authorization Level ..................................................................... 2 3 4 4 0 

Estimated Outlays ...................................................................... 1 3 4 4 2 

Consumer Information on Residential Long-Term Care: 

Authorization Level ..................................................................... 3 3 3 3 0 

Estimated Outlays ...................................................................... 2 3 3 3 2 

National Nurses Aid Registry: 

Authorization Level ..................................................................... 1 0 0 0 0 

Estimated Outlays ...................................................................... * * * 0 0 

Total Spending Under S. 2010: 

Authorization Level ............................................................ 189 213 286 286 0 

Estimated Outlays ............................................................. 32 137 234 286 205 

NOTE: * = less than $500,000. 

Spending subject to appropriation 

Part A: National Coordination of Elder Justice Activities and Research. Part A of the new subtitle would establish an Elder Justice 

Coordinating Council and an advisory board on Elder Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation. The bill would authorize the appropriation 

of $6.5 million for fiscal year 2007 and $7 million annually for fiscal years 2008 through 2010 for those activities. 

In addition, Part A would establish stationary and mobile centers 

for the provision of forensic services relating to elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation. For example, such centers would establish 

indicators of crimes related to elder abuse as well as methodologies 

for determining whether and how various service providers should 

intervene if such abuse is indicated. The bill would authorize appropriations of $4 million for fiscal year 2007, $6 million for fiscal 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
28 

year 2008, and $8 million for each of fiscal years 2009 and 2010 

to establish those centers. 

Part B: Programs to Promote Elder Justice. Part B would provide 

grants and incentives to long-term care facilities that would improve management practices, and encourage training, recruitment, 

and retention of employees. In addition, part B would authorize 

grants to long-term care facilities to improve and upgrade computer 

software and hardware that would improve patient safety and reduce health care complications resulting from mediation errors. 

The bill would authorize appropriations of $20 million for fiscal 

year 2007, $18 million for fiscal year 2008, and $15 million for each 

of fiscal years 2009 and 2010 for those purposes. 

Part B also would authorize funding for state and local adult protective service offices that would investigate reports of the abuse, 

neglect, and exploitation of elders, and would require the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to collect and disseminate data related to elder abuse. The bill would authorize appropriations of $3 million for fiscal year 2007 and $4 million for each 

of fiscal years 2008 through 2010 for the administrative responsibilities of HHS, and $100 million for each of fiscal years 2007 

through 2010 for grants to states. In addition, the bill would authorize demonstration programs for states and local governments to 

test methods aimed at detecting and preventing elder abuse. Those 

demonstration programs would be authorized at $25 million per 

year for the 2007–2010 period. 

The bill would authorize grants to support the existing long-term 

care ombudsman program by improving the capacity of state programs to respond to and resolve complaints about abuse and neglect, conducting pilot programs with state or local offices and providing support for those programs through a national resource center. Those grants would be authorized at $5 million for fiscal year 

2007, $7.5 million for fiscal year 2008, and $10 million for each of 

fiscal years 2009 and 2010. 

Finally, Part B would authorize appropriations of $10 million in 

each of fiscal years 2007 through 2010 for ombudsman training 

programs. 

Part C: Collection of Data, Dissemination of Information, and 

Studies. The bill would establish standards for the collection, maintenance and dissemination of data relating to elder abuse, neglect, 

and exploitation under Part C of the new subtitle. In the first year 

after enactment of the bill, HHS would develop methods for collecting national data relating to elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation. In the following year, the data reporting forms and collection methods would be tested in six states, and adjusted as necessary, before being distributed nationally. The bill would authorize HHS to provide grants to states to improve their data collection 

activities relating to elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation. For 

those data collection activities, S. 2010 would authorize appropriations of $10 million for fiscal year 2007, $30 million for fiscal year 

2008, and $100 million for each of fiscal years 2009 and 2010. 

In addition, the bill would establish a consumer clearinghouse on 

long-term care that would provide information about choices relating to long-term care. For that purpose, the bill would authorize 

appropriations of $2 million for fiscal year 2007, $3 million for fisVerDate Aug 31 2005 21:37 Sep 22, 2006 Jkt 004910 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\SR337.XXX SR337

hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
29 

cal year 2008, and $4 million for each of fiscal years 2009 and 

2010. 

The bill also would authorize a study on consumer concerns relating to residential long-term care facilities (other than nursing facilities). funding for that study would be authorized at $3 million 

for each of fiscal years 2007 through 2010. 

Finally, the bill would authorize a national nurses aide registry, but funding for the registry could not exceed $500,000. 

Revenues 

S. 2010 could affect revenues through the creation of several new 

civil penalties for violations relating to non-reporting of crimes 

against residents in long-term care facilities. Collections of such 

penalties are recorded as revenues and deposited in the Treasury; 

however, CBO expects that any increase in revenues related to 

those penalties would be negligible. 

Intergovernmental and private-sector impact: S. 2010 contains no 

intergovernmental or private-sector mandates as defined in UMRA. 

The bill would authorize grants to state, local, and tribal governments for prevention and intervention programs, training, and 

multidisiplinary and collaborative programs tied to elder abuse, neglect, and exploitations. The costs of any requirements tied to these 

grants would be incurred voluntarily. 

Estimate prepared by: Federal Costs: Christina Hawley Anthony; 

Impact on state, local, and tribal governments: Lisa RamirezBranum; Impact on the private sector: Paige Shevlin. 

Estimate approved by: Peter H. Fontaine, Deputy Assistant Director for Budget Analysis. 

V. VOTES OF THE COMMITTEE 

In compliance with paragraph 7(b) of rule XXVI of the Standing 

Rules of the Senate, the following statements are made concerning 

the votes taken on the Committee’s consideration of the bill. 

On August 3, 2006, the bill, as modified, was ordered favorably 

reported by roll call vote—20 ayes, 0 nays. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
30 

VI. CHANGES IN EXISTING LAW 

In compliance with paragraph 12 of Rule XXVI of the Standing 

Rules of the Senate, changes in existing law made by the bill, as 

reported, are shown as follows (existing law proposed to be omitted 

is enclosed in black brackets, new matter is printed in italics, existing law in which no change is proposed is shown in roman): 

SOCIAL SECURITY ACT 

* * * * * * * 

TITLE IV—GRANTS TO STATES FOR AID AND 

SERVICES TO NEEDY FAMILIES WITH CHILDREN AND FOR CHILD-WELFARE SERVICES 

PART A—BLOCK GRANTS TO STATES FOR TEMPORARY 

ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES 

* * * * * * * 

ELIGIBLE STATES; STATE PLAN

SEC. 402. (a) IN GENERAL.—As used in this part, the term ‘‘eligible State’’ means, with respect to a fiscal year, a State that, during 

the 27-month period ending with the close of the 1st quarter of the 

fiscal year, has submitted to the Secretary a plan that the Secretary has found includes the following: 

(1) OUTLINE OF FAMILY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.—

(A) GENERAL PROVISIONS.—A written document that outlines how the State intends to do the following: 

(i) Conduct a program, designed to serve all political 

subdivisions in the State (not necessarily in a uniform 

manner), that provides assistance to needy families 

with (or expecting) children and provides parents with 

job preparation, work and support services to enable 

them to leave the program and become self-sufficient. 

* * * * * * * 

(vii) Coordinate the program with activities carried 

out by the Secretary under section 2041(a) in order to 

facilitate such activities and provide incentives for individuals to train for, seek, and maintain employment 

providing direct care in a long-term care facility (as 

such terms are defined in section 2011). 

* * * * * * * 

USE OF GRANTS

SEC. 404. (a) GENERAL RULES.—Subject to this part, a State to 

which a grant is made under section 403 may use the grant—

* * * * * * * 

(d) AUTHORITY TO USE PORTION OF GRANT FOR OTHER PURPOSES.—


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
31 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), a State may use 

not more than 30 percent of the amount of any grant made to 

the State under section 403(a) for a fiscal year to carry out a 

State program pursuant to any or all of the following provisions of law: 

(A) Subtitle 1 of title XX of this Act. 

(B) The Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 

1990. 

(2) LIMITATION ON AMOUNT TRANSFERABLE TO SUBTITLE 1 OF

TITLE XX PROGRAMS.—

(A) IN GENERAL.—A State may use not more than the 

applicable percent of the amount of any grant made to the 

State under section 403(a) for a fiscal year to carry out 

State programs pursuant to subtitle 1 of title XX. 

(B) APPLICABLE PERCENT.—For purposes of subparagraph (A), the applicable percent is 4.25 percent in the 

case of fiscal year 2001 and each succeeding fiscal year. 

(3) APPLICABLE RULES.—

(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subparagraph 

(B) of this paragraph, any amount paid to a State under 

this part that is used to carry out a State program pursuant to a provision of law specified in paragraph (1) shall 

not be subject to the requirements of this part, but shall 

be subject to the requirements that apply to Federal funds 

provided directly under the provision of law to carry out 

the program, and the expenditure of any amount so used 

shall not be considered to be an expenditure under this 

part. 

(B) EXCEPTION RELATING TO SUBTITLE 1 OF TITLE XX PROGRAMS.—All amounts paid to a State under this part that 

are used to carry out State programs pursuant to subtitle 

1 of title XX shall be used only for programs and services 

to children or their families whose income is less than 200 

percent of the income official poverty line (as defined by 

the Office of Management and Budget, and revised annually in accordance with section 673(2) of the Omnibus 

Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981) applicable to a family 

of the size involved. 

* * * * * * * 

PART B—CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES 

SUBPART 1—CHILD WELFARE SERVICES

APPROPRIATION

SEC. 420. (a) * * * 

* * * * * * * 

STATE PLANS FOR CHILD WELFARE SERVICES

SEC. 422. (a) In order to be eligible for payment under this subpart, a State must have a plan for child welfare services which has 

been developed jointly by the Secretary and the State agency desVerDate Aug 31 2005 21:37 Sep 22, 2006 Jkt 004910 PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 6602 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\SR337.XXX SR337

hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
32 

ignated pursuant to subsection (b)(1), and which meets the requirements of subsection (b). 

(b) Each plan for child welfare services under this subpart 

shall—

(1) provide that (A) the individual or agency that administers 

or supervises the administration of the State’s services program under subtitle 1 of title XX will administer or supervise 

the administration of the plan (except as otherwise provided in 

section 103(d) of the Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare 

Act of 1980), and (B) to the extent that child welfare services 

are furnished by the staff of the State agency or local agency 

administering the plan, a single organizational unit in such 

State or local agency, as the case may be, will be responsible 

for furnishing such child welfare services; 

(2) provide for coordination between the services provided for 

children under the plan and the services and assistance provided under subtitle 1 of title XX, under the State program 

funded under part A, under the State plan approved under 

subpart 2 of this part, under the State plan approved under 

the State plan approved under part E, and under other State 

programs having a relationship to the program under this subpart, with a view to provision of welfare and related services 

which will best promote the welfare of such children and their 

families; 

(3) provide that the standards and requirements imposed 

with respect to child day care under subtitle 1 of title XX shall 

apply with respect to day care services under this subpart, except insofar as eligibility for such services is involved; 

* * * * * * * 

PART E—FEDERAL PAYMENTS FOR FOSTER CARE AND 

ADOPTION ASSISTANCE 

* * * * * * * 

STATE PLAN FOR FOSTER CARE AND ADOPTION ASSISTANCE

SEC. 471. (a) In order for a State to be eligible for payments 

under this part, it shall have a plan approved by the Secretary 

which—

(1) provides for foster care maintenance payments in accordance with section 472 and for adoption assistance in accordance with section 473; 

(2) provides that the State agency responsible for administering the program authorized by subpart 1 of part B of this 

title shall administer, or supervise the administration of, the 

program authorized by this part; 

(3) provides that the plan shall be in effect in all political 

subdivisions of the State, and, if administered by them, be 

mandatory upon them; 

(4) provides that the State shall assure that the programs at 

the local level assisted under this part will be coordinated with 

the programs at the State or local level assisted under parts 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
33 

A and B of this title, under subtitle 1 of title XX of this Act, 

and under any other appropriate provision of Federal law; 

* * * * * * * 

FOSTER CARE MAINTENANCE PAYMENTS PROGRAM

SEC. 472. (a) Each State with a plan approved under this part 

shall make foster care maintenance payments (as defined in section 

475(4)) under this part with respect to a child who would have met 

the requirements of section 406(a) or of section 407 (as such sections were in effect on July 16, 1996) but for his removal from the 

home of a relative (specified in section 406(a) (as so in effect)), if—

* * * * * * * 

(h)(1) For purposes of titles XIX, any child with respect to 

whom foster care maintenance payments are made under this 

section is deemed to be a dependent child as defined in section 

406 (as in effect as of July 16, 1996) and deemed to be a recipient of aid to families with dependent children under part A of 

this title (as so in effect). For purposes of subtitle 1 of title XX, 

any child with respect to whom foster care maintenance payments are made under this section is deemed to be a minor 

child in a needy family under a State program funded under 

part A of this title and is deemed to be a recipient of assistance 

under such part. 

* * * * * * * 

ADOPTION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM

SEC. 473. (a)(1)(A) Each State having a plan approved under this 

part shall enter into adoption assistance agreements (as defined in 

section 475(3)) with the adoptive parents of children with special 

needs. 

* * * * * * * 

(b)(1) For purposes of title XIX, any child who is described in 

paragraph (3) is deemed to be a dependent child as defined in section 406 (as in effect as of July 16, 1996) and deemed to be a recipient of aid to families with dependent children under part A of this 

title (as so in effect) in the State where such child resides. 

(2) For purposes of subtitle 1 of title XX, any child who is described in paragraph (3) is deemed to be a minor child in a 

needy family under a State program funded under part A of 

this title and deemed to be a recipient of assistance under such 

part. 

* * * * * * * 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
34 

TITLE XI—GENERAL PROVISIONS, PEER REVIEW, AND ADMINISTRATIVE SIMPLIFICATION 

PART A—GENERAL PROVISIONS 

DEFINITIONS

SEC. 1101. (a) When used in this Act—

(1) The term ‘‘State’’, except where otherwise provided, includes the District of Columbia and the Commonwealth of 

Puerto Rico, and when used in titles IV, V, VII, XI, XIX, and 

XXI includes the Virgin Islands and Guam. Such term when 

used in titles III, IX, and XII also includes the Virgin Islands. 

Such term when used in title V and in part B of this title also 

includes American Samoa, the Northern Mariana Islands, and 

the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands. Such term when 

used in titles XIX and XXI also includes the Northern Mariana 

Islands and American Samoa. In the case of Puerto Rico, the 

Virgin Islands, and Guam, titles I, X, and XIV, and title XVI 

(as in effect without regard to the amendment made by section 

301 of the Social Security Amendments of 1972) shall continue 

to apply, and the term ‘‘State’’ when used in such titles (but 

not in title XVI as in effect pursuant to such amendment after 

December 31, 1973) includes Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, 

and Guam. Such term when used in title XX also includes the 

Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Northern 

Mariana Islands. Such term when used in title IV also includes 

American Samoa. 

* * * * * * * 

EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS AND ENTITIES FROM

PARTICIPATION IN MEDICARE AND STATE HEALTH CARE PROGRAMS

SEC. 1128. (a) MANDATORY EXCLUSION.—The Secretary shall exclude the following individuals and entities from participation in 

any Federal health care program (as defined in section 1128B(f)): 

* * * * * * * 

(h) DEFINITION OF STATE HEALTH CARE PROGRAM.—For purposes 

of this section and sections 1128A and 1128B, the term ‘‘State 

health care program’’ means—

(1) a State plan approved under title XIX, 

(2) any program receiving funds under title V or from an allotment to a State under such title, 

(3) any program receiving funds under subtitle 1 of title XX 

or from an allotment to a State under øsuch title¿ such subtitle, or 

(4) a State child health plan approved under title XXI. 

* * * * * * * 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
35 

CIVIL MONETARY PENALTIES

SEC. 1128A. (a) Any person (including an organization, agency, 

or other entity, but excluding a beneficiary, as defined in subsection (i)(5)) that—

* * * * * * * 

(i) For the purposes of this section: 

(1) The term ‘‘State agency’’ means the agency established or 

designated to administer or supervise the administration of the 

State plan under title XIX of this Act or designated to administer the State’s program under title V or subtitle 1 of title XX 

of this Act. 

* * * * * * * 

STATE GRANTS FOR WORK INCENTIVES ASSISTANCE TO DISABLED

BENEFICIARIES

SEC. 1150. * * * 

* * * * * * * 

REPORTING TO LAW ENFORCEMENT OF CRIMES OCCURRING IN

FEDERALLY FUNDED LONG-TERM CARE FACILITIES

SEC. 1150A. (a) DETERMINATION AND NOTIFICATION.— (1) DETERMINATION.—The owner or operator of each longterm care facility that receives Federal funds under this Act 

shall annually determine whether the facility received at least 

$10,000 in such Federal funds during the preceding year. 

(2) NOTIFICATION.—If the owner or operator determines under 

paragraph (1) that the facility received at least $10,000 in such 

Federal funds during the preceding year, such owner or operator shall annually notify each covered individual (as defined 

in paragraph (3)) of that individual’s obligation to comply with 

the reporting requirements described in subsection (b). 

(3) COVERED INDIVIDUAL DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘covered individual’’ means each individual who is an owner, 

operator, employee, manager, agent, or contractor of a long-term 

care facility that is the subject of a determination described in 

paragraph (1). 

(b) REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—Each covered individual shall report to the 

Secretary and 1 or more law enforcement entities for the political subdivision in which the facility is located any reasonable 

suspicion of a crime (as defined by the law of the applicable political subdivision) against any individual who is a resident of, 

or is receiving care from, the facility. 

(2) TIMING.—If the events that cause the suspicion—

(A) result in serious bodily injury, the individual shall 

report the suspicion immediately, but not later than 2 

hours after forming the suspicion; and 

(B) do not result in serious bodily injury, the individual 

shall report the suspicion not later than 24 hours after 

forming the suspicion. 

(c) PENALTIES.—


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
36 

(1) IN GENERAL.—If a covered individual violates subsection 

(b)— (A) the covered individual shall be subject to a civil money penalty of not more than $200,000; or 

(B) the Secretary shall classify the covered individual as 

an excluded individual, for a period of not more than 3 

years. 

(2) INCREASED HARM.—If a covered individual violates subsection (b) and the violation exacerbates the harm to the victim 

of the crime or results in harm to another individual— (A) the covered individual shall be subject to a civil money penalty of not more than $300,000; and 

(B) the Secretary shall classify the covered individual as 

an excluded individual, for a period of not more than 3 

years. 

(3) EXCLUDED INDIVIDUAL.—During any period for which a 

covered individual is classified as an excluded individual under 

paragraph (1)(B) or (2)(B), a long-term care facility that employs such individual shall be ineligible to receive Federal 

funds under this Act. 

(4) EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES.— (A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may take into account 

the financial burden on providers with underserved populations in determining any penalty to be imposed under 

this subsection. 

(B) UNDERSERVED POPULATION DEFINED.—In this paragraph, the term ‘‘underserved population’’ means the population of an area designated by the Secretary as an area 

with a shortage of elder justice programs or a population 

group designated by the Secretary as having a shortage of 

such programs. Such areas or groups designated by the 

Secretary may include— (i) areas or groups that are geographically isolated 

(such as isolated in a rural area); 

(ii) racial and ethnic minority populations; and 

(iii) populations underserved because of special needs 

(such as language barriers, disabilities, alien status, or 

age). 

(d) ADDITIONAL PENALTIES FOR RETALIATION.— (1) IN GENERAL.—A long-term care facility may not—

(A) discharge, demote, suspend, threaten, harass, or deny 

a promotion or other employment-related benefit to an employee, or in any other manner discriminate against an employee in the terms and conditions of employment because 

of lawful acts done by the employee; or 

(B) file a complaint or a report against a nurse or other 

employee with the appropriate State professional disciplinary agency because of lawful acts done by the nurse or employee, 

for making a report, causing a report to be made, or for taking 

steps in furtherance of making a report pursuant to subsection 

(b)(1). 

(2) PENALTIES FOR RETALIATION.—If a long-term care facility 

violates subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) the facility 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
37 

shall be subject to a civil money penalty of not more than 

$200,000 or the Secretary may classify the entity as an excluded 

entity for a period of 2 years pursuant to section 1128(b), or 

both. 

(3) REQUIREMENT TO POST NOTICE.—Each long-term care facility shall post conspicuously in an appropriate location a sign 

(in a form specified by the Secretary) specifying the rights of 

employees under this section. Such sign shall include a statement that an employee may file a complaint with the Secretary 

against a long-term care facility that violates the provisions of 

this subsection and information with respect to the manner of 

filing such a complaint. 

(e) PROCEDURE.—The provisions of section 1128A (other than subsections (a) and (b) and the second sentence of subsection (f)) shall 

apply to a civil money penalty under this section in the same manner as such provisions apply to a penalty or proceeding under section 1128A(a). 

(f) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the terms ‘‘elder justice’’, ‘‘longterm care facility’’, and ‘‘law enforcement’’ have the meanings given 

those terms in section 2011. 

ENSURING SAFETY OF RESIDENTS WHEN FEDERALLY FUNDED LONGTERM CARE FACILITIES CLOSE

SEC. 1150B. (a) NOTIFICATION OF FACILITY CLOSURE.—If the 

owner or operator determines under section 1150A(a)(1) that a longterm care facility received at least $10,000 in Federal funds under 

this Act during the preceding year, the owner or operator of the facility shall— (1) submit to the Secretary and the appropriate State regulatory agency written notification of an impending closure not 

later than the date that is 60 days prior to the date of such closure; 

(2) include in the notice a plan for the transfer and adequate 

relocation of the residents of the facility prior to closure, including assurances that the residents will be transferred to the most 

appropriate facility in terms of quality, services, and location; 

and 

(3) not later than 10 days after the facility closure, submit to 

the Secretary and the appropriate State agency information 

identifying where residents of the closed facility were transferred and on what date. 

(b) SANCTIONS.—Any person owning or operating a long-term care 

facility that fails to comply with the requirements of subsection (a) 

shall be subject to—

(1) a civil monetary penalty of up to $1,000,000; 

(2) exclusion from participation in the programs under this 

Act (in accordance with the procedures of section 1128); and 

(3) any other applicable civil monetary penalties and assessments. 

(c) PROCEDURE.—The provisions of section 1128A (other than subsections (a) and (b) and the second sentence of subsection (f)) shall 

apply to a civil money penalty or assessment under this section in 

the same manner as such provisions apply to a penalty or proceeding under section 1128A(a). 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
38 

(d) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘long-term care facility’’ has the meaning given that term in section 2011. 

* * * * * * * 

TITLE XX—BLOCK GRANTS TO STATES FOR 

SOCIAL SERVICES AND ELDER JUSTICE 

Subtitle 1—Block Grants to States for Social 

Services 

PURPOSES OF øTITLE¿ SUBTITLE; AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS

SEC. 2001. For the purposes of consolidating Federal assistance 

to States for social services into a single grant, increasing State 

flexibility in using social service grants, and encouraging each 

State, as far as practicable under the conditions in that State, to 

furnish services directed at the goals of— (1) achieving or maintaining economic self-support to prevent, reduce, or eliminate dependency; 

(2) achieving or maintaining self-sufficiency, including reduction or prevention of dependency; 

(3) preventing or remedying neglect, abuse, or exploitation of 

children and adults unable to protect their own interests, or 

preserving, rehabilitating or reuniting families; 

(4) preventing or reducing inappropriate institutional care by 

providing for community-based care, home-based care, or other 

forms of less intensive care; and 

(5) securing referral or admission for institutional care when 

other forms of care are not appropriate, or providing services 

to individuals in institutions, 

there are authorized to be appropriated for each fiscal year such 

sums as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of øthis title¿ 

this subtitle. 

PAYMENTS TO STATES

SEC. 2002. (a)(1) Each State shall be entitled to payment under 

øthis title¿ this subtitle for each fiscal year in an amount equal to 

its allotment for such fiscal year, to be used by such State for services directed at the goals set forth in section 2001, subject to the 

requirements of øthis title¿ this subtitle. 

(2) For purposes of paragraph (1)—

(A) services which are directed at the goals set forth in 

section 2001 include, but are not limited to, child care 

services, protective services for children and adults, services for children and adults in foster care, services related 

to the management and maintenance of the home, day 

care services for adults, transportation services, family 

planning services, training and related services, employment services, information, referral, and counseling services, the preparation and delivery of meals, health support 

services and appropriate combinations of services designed 

to meet the special needs of children, the aged, the mentally retarded, the blind, the emotionally disturbed, the 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
39 

physically handicapped, and alcoholics and drug addicts; 

and 

(B) expenditures for such services may include expenditures for—(i) administration (including planning and evaluation); 

(ii) personnel training and retraining directly related to the provision of those services (including both 

short- and long-term training at educational institutions through grants to such institutions or by direct 

financial assistance to students enrolled in such institutions); and 

(iii) conferences or workshops, and training or retraining through grants to nonprofit organizations 

within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the Internal 

Revenue Code of 1954 or to individuals with social 

services expertise, or through financial assistance to 

individuals participating in such conferences, workshops, and training or retraining (and this clause shall 

apply with respect to all persons involved in the delivery of such services). 

(b) The Secretary shall make payments in accordance with section 6503 of title 31, United States Code, to each State from its allotment for use under øthis title¿ this subtitle. (c) Payments to a State from its allotment for any fiscal year 

must be expended by the State in such fiscal year or in the succeeding fiscal year. 

(d) A State may transfer up to 10 percent of its allotment under 

section 2003 for any fiscal year for its use for that year under other 

provisions of Federal law providing block grants for support of 

health services, health promotion and disease prevention activities, 

or low-income home energy assistance (or any combination of those 

activities). Amounts allotted to a State under any provisions of 

Federal law referred to in the preceding sentence and transferred 

by a State for use in carrying out the purposes of øthis title¿ this 

subtitle shall be treated as if they were paid to the State under 

øthis title¿ this subtitle but shall not affect the computation of the 

State’s allotment under øthis title¿ this subtitle. The State shall inform the Secretary of any such transfer of funds. 

(e) A State may use a portion of the amounts described in subsection (a) for the purpose of purchasing technical assistance from 

public or private entities if the State determines that such assistance is required in developing, implementing, or administering programs funded under øthis title¿ this subtitle. 

(f) A State may use funds provided under øthis title¿ this subtitle 

to provide vouchers, for services directed at the goals set forth in 

section 2001, to families, including—

(1) families who have become ineligible for assistance under 

a State program funded under part A of title IV by reason of 

a durational limit on the provision of such assistance; and 

(2) families denied cash assistance under the State program 

funded under part A of title IV for a child who is born to a 

member of the family who is—

(A) a recipient of assistance under the program; or 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
40 

(B) a person who received such assistance at any time 

during the 10-month period ending with the birth of the 

child. 

ALLOTMENTS

SEC. 2003. (a) The allotment for any fiscal year to each of the jurisdictions of Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands, and the 

Northern Mariana Islands shall be an amount which bears the 

same ratio to the amount specified in subsection (c) as the amount 

which was specified for allocation to the particular jurisdiction involved for the fiscal year 1981 under section 2002(a)(2)(C) of this 

Act (as in effect prior to the enactment of this section) bore to 

$2,900,000,000. The allotment for fiscal year 1989 and each succeeding fiscal year to American Samoa shall be an amount which 

bears the same ratio to the amount allotted to the Northern Mariana Islands for that fiscal year as the population of American 

Samoa bears to the population of the Northern Mariana Islands determined on the basis of the most recent data available at the time 

such allotment is determined. 

* * * * * * * 

STATE ADMINISTRATION

SEC. 2004. Prior to expenditure by a State of payments made to 

it under section 2002 for any fiscal year, the State shall report on 

the intended use of the payments the State is to receive under 

øthis title¿ this subtitle, including information on the types of activities to be supported and the categories or characteristics of individuals to be served. The report shall be transmitted to the Secretary and made public within the State in such manner as to facilitate comment by any person (including any Federal or other 

public agency) during development of the report and after its completion. The report shall be revised throughout the year as may be 

necessary to reflect substantial changes in the activities assisted 

under øthis title¿ this subtitle, and any revision shall be subject to 

the requirements of the previous sentence. 

LIMITATIONS ON USE OF GRANTS

SEC. 2005. (a) Except as provided in subsection (b), grants made 

under øthis title¿ this subtitle may not be used by the State, or by 

any other person with which the State makes arrangements to 

carry out the purposes of øthis title¿ this subtitle—

(1) for the purchase or improvement of land, or the purchase, 

construction, or permanent improvement (other than minor remodeling) of any building or other facility; 

(2) for the provision of cash payments for costs of subsistence 

or for the provision of room and board (other than costs of subsistence during rehabilitation, room and board provided for a 

short term as an integral but subordinate part of a social service, or temporary emergency shelter provided as a protective 

service); 

(3) for payment of the wages of any individual as a social 

service (other than payment of the wages of welfare recipients 

employed in the provision of child day care services); 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
41 

(4) for the provision of medical care (other than family planning services, rehabilitation services, or initial detoxification of 

an alcoholic or drug dependent individual) unless it is an integral but subordinate part of a social service for which grants 

may be used under øthis title¿ this subtitle; 

(5) for social services (except services to an alcoholic or drug 

dependent individual or rehabilitation services) provided in 

and by employees of any hospital, skilled nursing facility, intermediate care facility, or prison, to any individual living in 

such institution; 

(6) for the provision of any educational service which the 

State makes generally available to its residents without cost 

and without regard to their income; 

(7) for any child day care services unless such services meet 

applicable standards of State and local law; 

(8) for the provision of cash payments as a service (except as 

otherwise provided in this section); 

(9) for payment for any item or service (other than an emergency item or service) furnished— (A) by an individual or entity during the period when 

such individual or entity is excluded under øthis title¿ this 

subtitle or title V, XVIII, or XIX pursuant to section 1128, 

1128A, 1156, or 1842(j)(2), or 

(B) at the medical direction or on the prescription of a 

physician during the period when the physician is excluded under øthis title¿ this subtitle or title V, XVIII, or 

XIX pursuant to section 1128, 1128A, 1156, or 1842(j)(2) 

and when the person furnishing such item or service knew 

or had reason to know of the exclusion (after a reasonable 

time period after reasonable notice has been furnished to 

the person); or 

(10) in a manner inconsistent with the Assisted Suicide 

Funding Restriction Act of 1997. 

(b) The Secretary may waive the limitation contained in subsection (a)(1) and (4) upon the State’s request for such a waiver if 

he finds that the request describes extraordinary circumstances to 

justify the waiver and that permitting the waiver will contribute to 

the State’s ability to carry out the purposes of øthis title¿ this subtitle. 

REPORTS AND AUDITS

SEC. 2006. (a) Each State shall prepare reports on its activities 

carried out with funds made available (or transferred for use) 

under øthis title¿ this subtitle. Reports shall be prepared annually, 

covering the most recently completed fiscal year, and shall be in 

such form and contain such information (including but not limited 

to the information specified in subsection (c)) as the State finds 

necessary to provide an accurate description of such activities, to 

secure a complete record of the purposes for which funds were 

spent, and to determine the extent to which funds were spent in 

a manner consistent with the reports required by section 2004. The 

State shall make copies of the reports required by this section 

available for public inspection within the State and shall transmit 

a copy to the Secretary. Copies shall also be provided, upon reVerDate Aug 31 2005 21:37 Sep 22, 2006 Jkt 004910 PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 6602 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\SR337.XXX SR337

hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
42 

quest, to any interested public agency, and each such agency may 

provide its views on these reports to the Congress. 

(b) Each State shall, not less often than every two years, audit 

its expenditures from amounts received (or transferred for use) 

under øthis title¿ this subtitle. Such State audits shall be conducted by an entity independent of any agency administering activities funded under øthis title¿ this subtitle, in accordance with 

generally accepted auditing principles. Within 30 days following 

the completion of each audit, the State shall submit a copy of that 

audit to the legislature of the State and to the Secretary. Each 

State shall repay to the United States amounts ultimately found 

not to have been expended in accordance with øthis title¿ this subtitle, or the Secretary may offset such amounts against any other 

amount to which the State is or may become entitled under øthis 

title¿ this subtitle. (c) Each report prepared and transmitted by a State under subsection (a) shall set forth (with respect to the fiscal year covered 

by the report)— (1) the number of individuals who received services paid for 

in whole or in part with funds made available under øthis 

title¿ this subtitle, showing separately the number of children 

and the number of adults who received such services, and broken down in each case to reflect the types of services and circumstances involved; 

* * * * * * * 

ADDITIONAL GRANTS

SEC. 2007. (a) ENTITLEMENT.— * * * 

* * * * * * * 

(f) DEFINITIONS.—AS USED IN THIS SECTION: 

(1) QUALIFIED EMPOWERMENT ZONE.— * * * 

* * * * * * * 

(6) URBAN AREA.—The term ‘‘urban area’’ has the meaning 

given such term in section 1393(a)(3) of the Internal Revenue 

Code of 1986. 

* * * * * * * 

Subtitle 2—Elder Justice 

SEC. 2011. DEFINITIONS. 

In this subtitle: 

(1) ABUSE.—The term ‘‘abuse’’ means the knowing infliction 

of physical or psychological harm or the knowing deprivation of 

goods or services that are necessary to meet essential needs or 

to avoid physical or psychological harm. 

(2) ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES.—The term ‘‘adult protective 

services’’ means such services provided to adults as the Secretary may specify and includes services such as—

(A) disseminating reports of adult abuse, neglect, or exploitation; 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
43 

(B) investigating the reports described in subparagraph 

(A); 

(C) case planning, monitoring, evaluation, and other case 

work and services; and 

(D) providing, arranging for, or facilitating the provision 

of medical, social service, economic, legal, housing, law enforcement, or other protective, emergency, or support services. 

(3) CAREGIVER.—The term ‘‘caregiver’’ means an individual 

who has the responsibility for the care of an elder, either voluntarily, by contract, by receipt of payment for care, or as a result 

of the operation of law, and means a family member or other 

individual who provides (on behalf of such individual or of a 

public or private agency, organization, or institution) compensated or uncompensated care to an elder who needs supportive services in any setting. 

(4) DIRECT CARE.—The term ‘‘direct care’’ means care by an 

employee or contractor who provides assistance or long-term 

care services to a recipient. 

(5) ELDER.—The term ‘‘elder’’ means an individual age 60 or 

older. 

(6) ELDER JUSTICE.—The term ‘‘elder justice’’ means— (A) from a societal perspective, efforts to— (i) prevent, detect, treat, intervene in, and prosecute 

elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation; and 

(ii) protect elders with diminished capacity while 

maximizing their autonomy; and 

(B) from an individual perspective, the recognition of an 

elder’s rights, including the right to be free of abuse, neglect, and exploitation. 

(7) ELIGIBLE ENTITY.—The term ‘‘eligible entity’’ means a 

State or local government agency, Indian tribe or tribal organization, or any other public or private entity that is engaged in 

and has expertise in issues relating to elder justice or in a field 

necessary to promote elder justice efforts. 

(8) EXPLOITATION.—The term ‘‘exploitation’’ means the fraudulent or otherwise illegal, unauthorized, or improper act or 

process of an individual, including a caregiver or fiduciary, 

that uses the resources of an elder for monetary or personal benefit, profit, or gain, or that results in depriving an elder of 

rightful access to, or use of, benefits, resources, belongings, or 

assets. 

(9) FIDUCIARY.—The term ‘‘fiduciary’’—

(A) means a person or entity with the legal responsibility—

(i) to make decisions on behalf of and for the benefit 

of another person; and 

(ii) to act in good faith and with fairness; and 

(B) includes a trustee, a guardian, a conservator, an executor, an agent under a financial power of attorney or 

health care power of attorney, or a representative payee. 

(10) GRANT.—The term ‘‘grant’’ includes a contract, cooperative agreement, or other mechanism for providing financial assistance. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
44 

(11) GUARDIANSHIP.—The term ‘‘guardianship’’ means— (A) the process by which a State court determines that an 

adult individual lacks capacity to make decisions about 

self-care and property, and appoints another individual or 

entity known as a guardian, as a conservator, or by a similar term, as a surrogate decisionmaker; 

(B) the manner in which the court-appointed surrogate 

decisionmaker carries out duties to the individual and the 

court; or 

(C) the manner in which the court exercises oversight of 

the surrogate decisionmaker. 

(12) INDIAN TRIBE.—

(A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘‘Indian tribe’’ has the meaning given such term in section 4 of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450b). 

(B) INCLUSION OF PUEBLO AND RANCHERIA.—The term 

‘‘Indian tribe’’ includes any Pueblo or Rancheria. 

(13) LAW ENFORCEMENT.—The term ‘‘law enforcement’’ means 

the full range of potential responders to elder abuse, neglect, 

and exploitation including— (A) police, sheriffs, detectives, public safety officers, and 

corrections personnel; 

(B) prosecutors; 

(C) medical examiners; 

(D) investigators; and 

(E) coroners. 

(14) LONG-TERM CARE.— (A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘‘long-term care’’ means supportive and health services specified by the Secretary for individuals who need assistance because the individuals have 

a loss of capacity for self-care due to illness, disability, or 

vulnerability. 

(B) LOSS OF CAPACITY FOR SELF-CARE.—For purposes of 

subparagraph (A), the term ‘‘loss of capacity for self-care’’ means an inability to engage in 1 or more activities of daily 

living, including eating, dressing, bathing, and management of one’s financial affairs. 

(15) LONG-TERM CARE FACILITY.—The term ‘‘long-term care 

facility’’ means a residential care provider that arranges for, or 

directly provides, long-term care. 

(16) NEGLECT.—The term ‘‘neglect’’ means—

(A) the failure of a caregiver or fiduciary to provide the 

goods or services that are necessary to maintain the health 

or safety of an elder; or 

(B) self-neglect. 

(17) NURSING FACILITY.—

(A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘‘nursing facility’’ has the 

meaning given such term under section 1919(a). 

(B) INCLUSION OF SKILLED NURSING FACILITY.—The term ‘‘nursing facility’’ includes a skilled nursing facility (as defined in section 1819(a)). 

(18) SELF-NEGLECT.—The term ‘‘self-neglect’’ means an adult’s 

inability, due to physical or mental impairment or diminished 

capacity, to perform essential self-care tasks including—


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
45 

(A) obtaining essential food, clothing, shelter, and medical care; 

(B) obtaining goods and services necessary to maintain 

physical health, mental health, or general safety; or 

(C) managing one’s own financial affairs. 

(19) SERIOUS BODILY INJURY.—

(A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘‘serious bodily injury’’ means 

an injury—

(i) involving extreme physical pain; 

(ii) involving substantial risk of death; 

(iii) involving protracted loss or impairment of the 

function of a bodily member, organ, or mental faculty; 

or 

(iv) requiring medical intervention such as surgery, 

hospitalization, or physical rehabilitation. 

(B) CRIMINAL SEXUAL ABUSE.—Serious bodily injury 

shall be considered to have occurred if the conduct causing 

the injury is conduct described in section 2241 (relating to 

aggravated sexual abuse) or 2242 (relating to sexual abuse) 

of title 18, United States Code, or any similar offense under 

State law. 

(20) SOCIAL.—The term ‘‘social’’, when used with respect to a 

service, includes adult protective services. 

(21) STATE LEGAL ASSISTANCE DEVELOPER.—The term ‘‘State 

legal assistance developer’’ means an individual described in 

section 731 of the Older Americans Act of 1965. 

(22) STATE LONG-TERM CARE OMBUDSMAN.—The term ‘‘State 

Long-Term Care Ombudsman’’ means the State Long-Term 

Care Ombudsman described in section 712(a)(2) of the Older 

Americans Act of 1965. 

SEC. 2012. GENERAL PROVISIONS. 

(a) PROTECTION OF PRIVACY.—In pursuing activities under this 

subtitle, the Secretary shall ensure the protection of individual 

health privacy consistent with the regulations promulgated under 

section 264(c) of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 and applicable State and local privacy regulations. 

(b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this subtitle shall be 

construed to interfere with or abridge an elder’s right to practice his 

or her religion through reliance on prayer alone for healing when 

this choice—

(1) is contemporaneously expressed, either orally or in writing, with respect to a specific illness or injury which the elder 

has at the time of the decision by an elder who is competent at 

the time of the decision; 

(2) is previously set forth in a living will, health care proxy, 

or other advance directive document that is validly executed 

and applied under State law; or 

(3) may be unambiguously deduced from the elder’s life history. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
46 

PART A—NATIONAL COORDINATION OF ELDER JUSTICE 

ACTIVITIES AND RESEARCH 

Subpart 1—Elder Justice Coordinating Council and Advisory 

Board on Elder Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation 

SEC. 2021. ELDER JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL. 

(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—There is established within the Office of the 

Secretary an Elder Justice Coordinating Council (in this section referred to as the ‘‘Council’’). 

(b) MEMBERSHIP.— (1) IN GENERAL.—The Council shall be composed of the following members: 

(A) The Secretary (or the Secretary’s designee). 

(B) The Attorney General (or the Attorney General’s designee). 

(C) The head of each Federal department or agency or 

other governmental entity identified by the Chair referred 

to in subsection (d) as having responsibilities, or administering programs, relating to elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation. 

(2) REQUIREMENT.—Each member of the Council shall be an 

officer or employee of the Federal Government. 

(c) VACANCIES.—Any vacancy in the Council shall not affect its 

powers, but shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointment was made. 

(d) CHAIR.—The member described in subsection (b)(1)(A) shall be 

Chair of the Council. 

(e) MEETINGS.—The Council shall meet at least 2 times per year, 

as determined by the Chair. 

(f) DUTIES.— (1) IN GENERAL.—The Council shall make recommendations 

to the Secretary for the coordination of activities of the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Justice, 

and other relevant Federal, State, local, and private agencies 

and entities, relating to elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation 

and other crimes against elders. 

(2) REPORT.—Not later than the date that is 2 years after the 

date of enactment of the Elder Justice Act and every 2 years 

thereafter, the Council shall submit to the Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Committee on Ways and Means 

and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of 

Representatives a report that— (A) describes the activities and accomplishments of, and 

challenges faced by— (i) the Council; and 

(ii) the entities represented on the Council; and 

(B) makes such recommendations for legislation, model 

laws, or other action as the Council determines to be appropriate. 

(g) POWERS OF THE COUNCIL.— (1) INFORMATION FROM FEDERAL AGENCIES.—Subject to the 

requirements of section 2012(a), the Council may secure directly 

from any Federal department or agency such information as the 

Council considers necessary to carry out this section. Upon reVerDate Aug 31 2005 21:37 Sep 22, 2006 Jkt 004910 PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 6602 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\SR337.XXX SR337

hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
47 

quest of the Chair of the Council, the head of such department 

or agency shall furnish such information to the Council. 

(2) POSTAL SERVICES.—The Council may use the United 

States mails in the same manner and under the same conditions as other departments and agencies of the Federal Government. 

(h) TRAVEL EXPENSES.—The members of the Council shall not receive compensation for the performance of services for the Council. 

The members shall be allowed travel expenses, including per diem 

in lieu of subsistence, at rates authorized for employees of agencies 

under subchapter I of chapter 57 of title 5, United States Code, 

while away from their homes or regular places of business in the 

performance of services for the Council. Notwithstanding section 

1342 of title 31, United States Code, the Secretary may accept the 

voluntary and uncompensated services of the members of the Council. 

(i) DETAIL OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES.—Any Federal Government employee may be detailed to the Council without reimbursement, and such detail shall be without interruption or loss of civil 

service status or privilege. 

(j) STATUS AS PERMANENT COUNCIL.—Section 14 of the Federal 

Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) shall not apply to the 

Council. 

SEC. 2022. ADVISORY BOARD ON ELDER ABUSE, NEGLECT, AND EXPLOITATION. 

(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—There is established a board to be known as 

the ‘‘Advisory Board on Elder Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation’’ (in 

this section referred to as the ‘‘Advisory Board’’) to create short- and 

long-term multidisciplinary strategic plans for the development of 

the field of elder justice and to make recommendations to the Elder 

Justice Coordinating Council established under section 2021. 

(b) COMPOSITION.—The Advisory Board shall be composed of 27 

members appointed by the Secretary from among members of the 

general public who are individuals with experience and expertise in 

elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation prevention, detection, treatment, intervention, or prosecution. 

(c) SOLICITATION OF NOMINATIONS.—The Secretary shall publish 

a notice in the Federal Register soliciting nominations for the appointment of members of the Advisory Board under subsection (b). 

(d) TERMS.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—Each member of the Advisory Board shall 

be appointed for a term of 3 years, except that, of the members 

first appointed—

(A) 9 shall be appointed for a term of 3 years; 

(B) 9 shall be appointed for a term of 2 years; and 

(C) 9 shall be appointed for a term of 1 year. 

(2) VACANCIES.—

(A) IN GENERAL.—Any vacancy in the Advisory Board 

shall not affect its powers, but shall be filled in the same 

manner as the original appointment was made. 

(B) FILLING UNEXPIRED TERM.—An individual chosen to 

fill a vacancy shall be appointed for the unexpired term of 

the member replaced. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
48 

(3) EXPIRATION OF TERMS.—The term of any member shall 

not expire before the date on which the member’s successor takes 

office. 

(e) ELECTION OF OFFICERS.—The Advisory Board shall elect a 

Chair and Vice Chair from among its members. The Advisory 

Board shall elect its initial Chair and Vice Chair at its initial meeting. 

(f) DUTIES.—

(1) ENHANCE COMMUNICATION ON PROMOTING QUALITY OF, 

AND PREVENTING ABUSE AND NEGLECT IN, LONG-TERM CARE.—

The Advisory Board shall develop collaborative and innovative 

approaches to improve the quality of, including preventing 

abuse and neglect in, long-term care. 

(2) COLLABORATIVE EFFORTS TO DEVELOP CONSENSUS AROUND

THE MANAGEMENT OF CERTAIN QUALITY-RELATED FACTORS.—

(A) IN GENERAL.—The Advisory Board shall establish 

multidisciplinary panels to address, and develop consensus 

on, subjects relating to improving the quality of long-term 

care. At least 1 such panel shall address, and develop consensus on, methods for managing resident-to-resident abuse 

in long-term care. 

(B) ACTIVITIES CONDUCTED.—The multidisciplinary panels established under subparagraph (A) shall examine relevant research and data, identify best practices with respect 

to the subject of the panel, determine the best way to carry 

out those best practices in a practical and feasible manner, 

and determine an effective manner of distributing information on such subject. 

(3) REPORT.—Not later than the date that is 18 months after 

the date of enactment of the Elder Justice Act, and annually 

thereafter, the Advisory Board shall prepare and submit to the 

Elder Justice Coordinating Council, the Committee on Finance 

of the Senate, and the Committee on Ways and Means and the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives a report containing—

(A) information on the status of Federal, State, and local 

public and private elder justice activities; 

(B) recommendations (including recommended priorities) 

regarding—

(i) elder justice programs, research, training, services, practice, enforcement, and coordination; 

(ii) coordination between entities pursuing elder justice efforts and those involved in related areas that 

may inform or overlap with elder justice efforts, such 

as activities to combat violence against women and 

child abuse and neglect; and 

(iii) activities relating to adult fiduciary systems, including guardianship and other fiduciary arrangements; 

(C) recommendations for specific modifications needed in 

Federal and State laws (including regulations) or for programs, research, and training to enhance prevention, detection, and treatment (including diagnosis) of, intervention in 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
49 

(including investigation of), and prosecution of elder abuse, 

neglect, and exploitation; 

(D) recommendations on methods for the most effective 

coordinated national data collection with respect to elder 

justice, and elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation; and 

(E) recommendations for a multidisciplinary strategic 

plan to guide the effective and efficient development of the 

field of elder justice. 

(g) POWERS OF THE ADVISORY BOARD.—

(1) INFORMATION FROM FEDERAL AGENCIES.—Subject to the 

requirements of section 2012(a), the Advisory Board may secure 

directly from any Federal department or agency such information as the Advisory Board considers necessary to carry out this 

section. Upon request of the Chair of the Advisory Board, the 

head of such department or agency shall furnish such information to the Advisory Board. 

(2) SHARING OF DATA AND REPORTS.—The Advisory Board 

may request from any entity pursuing elder justice activities 

under the Elder Justice Act or an amendment made by that 

Act, any data, reports, or recommendations generated in connection with such activities. 

(3) POSTAL SERVICES.—The Advisory Board may use the 

United States mails in the same manner and under the same 

conditions as other departments and agencies of the Federal 

Government. 

(h) TRAVEL EXPENSES.—The members of the Advisory Board shall 

not receive compensation for the performance of services for the Advisory Board. The members shall be allowed travel expenses for up 

to 4 meetings per year, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, at 

rates authorized for employees of agencies under subchapter I of 

chapter 57 of title 5, United States Code, while away from their 

homes or regular places of business in the performance of services 

for the Advisory Board. Notwithstanding section 1342 of title 31, 

United States Code, the Secretary may accept the voluntary and uncompensated services of the members of the Advisory Board. 

(i) DETAIL OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES.—Any Federal Government employee may be detailed to the Advisory Board without reimbursement, and such detail shall be without interruption or loss of 

civil service status or privilege. 

(j) STATUS AS PERMANENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE.—Section 14 of 

the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) shall not apply 

to the advisory board. 

SEC. 2023. RESEARCH PROTECTIONS. 

(a) GUIDELINES.—The Secretary shall promulgate guidelines to 

assist researchers working in the area of elder abuse, neglect, and 

exploitation, with issues relating to human subject protections. 

(b) DEFINITION OF LEGALLY AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE FOR

APPLICATION OF REGULATIONS.—For purposes of the application of 

subpart A of part 46 of title 45, Code of Federal Regulations, to research conducted under this subpart, the term ‘‘legally authorized 

representative’’ means, unless otherwise provided by law, the individual or judicial or other body authorized under the applicable law 

to consent to medical treatment on behalf of another person. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
50 

SEC. 2024. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this subpart—(1) for fiscal year 2007, $6,500,000; and 

(2) for each of fiscal years 2008 through 2010, $7,000,000. 

Subpart 2—Elder Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Forensic 

Centers 

SEC. 2031. ESTABLISHMENT AND SUPPORT OF ELDER ABUSE, NEGLECT, AND EXPLOITATION FORENSIC CENTERS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary, in consultation with the Attorney General, shall make grants to eligible entities to establish and 

operate stationary and mobile forensic centers, to develop forensic 

expertise regarding, and provide services relating to, elder abuse, 

neglect, and exploitation. 

(b) STATIONARY FORENSIC CENTERS.—The Secretary shall make 4 

of the grants described in subsection (a) to institutions of higher 

education with demonstrated expertise in forensics or commitment 

to preventing or treating elder abuse, neglect, or exploitation, to establish and operate stationary forensic centers. 

(c) MOBILE CENTERS.—The Secretary shall make 6 of the grants 

described in subsection (a) to appropriate entities to establish and 

operate mobile forensic centers. 

(d) AUTHORIZED ACTIVITIES.— (1) DEVELOPMENT OF FORENSIC MARKERS AND METHODOLO- GIES.—An eligible entity that receives a grant under this section 

shall use funds made available through the grant to assist in 

determining whether abuse, neglect, or exploitation occurred 

and whether a crime was committed and to conduct research to 

describe and disseminate information on— (A) forensic markers that indicate a case in which elder 

abuse, neglect, or exploitation may have occurred; and 

(B) methodologies for determining, in such a case, when 

and how health care, emergency service, social and protective services, and legal service providers should intervene 

and when the providers should report the case to law enforcement authorities. 

(2) DEVELOPMENT OF FORENSIC EXPERTISE.—An eligible entity that receives a grant under this section shall use funds made 

available through the grant to develop forensic expertise regarding elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation in order to provide 

medical and forensic evaluation, therapeutic intervention, victim support and advocacy, case review, and case tracking. 

(3) COLLECTION OF EVIDENCE.—The Secretary, in coordination with the Attorney General, shall use data made available 

by grant recipients under this section to develop the capacity of 

geriatric health care professionals and law enforcement to collect forensic evidence, including collecting forensic evidence relating to a potential determination of elder abuse, neglect, or exploitation. 

(e) APPLICATION.—To be eligible to receive a grant under this section, an entity shall submit an application to the Secretary at such 

time, in such manner, and containing such information as the Secretary may require. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
51 

(f) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There are authorized to 

be appropriated to carry out this section—

(1) for fiscal year 2007, $4,000,000; 

(2) for fiscal year 2008, $6,000,000; and 

(3) for each of fiscal years 2009 and 2010, $8,000,000. 

PART B—PROGRAMS TO PROMOTE ELDER JUSTICE 

SEC. 2041. ENHANCEMENT OF LONG-TERM CARE. 

(a) GRANTS AND INCENTIVES FOR LONG-TERM CARE STAFFING.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall carry out activities, including activities described in paragraphs (2) and (3), to provide incentives for individuals to train for, seek, and maintain 

employment providing direct care in a long-term care facility. 

(2) SPECIFIC PROGRAMS TO ENHANCE TRAINING, RECRUITMENT, AND RETENTION OF STAFF.—

(A) COORDINATION WITH OTHER PROGRAMS TO RECRUIT

AND TRAIN LONG-TERM CARE STAFF.—The Secretary shall 

coordinate activities under this subsection with the Secretary of Labor and the Assistant Secretary for the Administration for Children and Families in order to provide incentives to participants in programs carried out under part 

A of title IV to train for and seek employment providing direct care in a long-term care facility. 

(B) CAREER LADDERS AND WAGE OR BENEFIT INCREASES

TO INCREASE STAFFING IN LONG-TERM CARE FACILITIES.—

(i) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall make grants to 

long-term care facilities to carry out programs through 

which the facilities—

(I) offer, to employees who provide direct care to 

residents of a long-term care facility, continuing 

training and varying levels of certification, based 

on observed clinical care practices and the amount 

of time the employees spend providing direct care; 

and 

(II) provide, or make arrangements to provide, 

bonuses or other increased compensation or benefits to employees who achieve certification under 

such a program. 

(ii) APPLICATION.—To be eligible to receive a grant 

under this subparagraph, a long-term care facility 

shall submit an application to the Secretary at such 

time, in such manner, and containing such information as the Secretary may require (which may include 

evidence of consultation with the State in which the 

long-term care facility is located with respect to carrying out activities funded under the grant). 

(iii) AUTHORITY TO LIMIT NUMBER OF APPLICANTS.—

Nothing in this subparagraph shall be construed as 

prohibiting the Secretary from limiting the number of 

applicants for a grant under this subparagraph. 

(3) SPECIFIC PROGRAMS TO IMPROVE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES.—


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
52 

(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall make grants to 

long-term care facilities to enable the facilities to provide 

training and technical assistance to eligible employees. 

(B) AUTHORIZED ACTIVITIES.—A long-term care facility 

that receives a grant under subparagraph (A) shall use 

funds made available through the grant to provide training 

and technical assistance to eligible employees regarding 

management practices using methods that are demonstrated to promote retention of individuals who provide 

direct care to residents of the long-term care facility, such 

as— (i) the establishment of standard human resource 

policies that reward high performance, including policies that provide for improved wages and benefits on 

the basis of job reviews; 

(ii) the establishment of motivational and thoughtful 

work organization practices; 

(iii) the creation of a workplace culture that respects 

and values caregivers and their needs; 

(iv) the promotion of a workplace culture that respects the rights of residents of a long-term care facility 

and results in improved care for the residents; and 

(v) the establishment of other programs that promote 

the provision of high quality care, such as a continuing 

education program that provides additional hours of 

training, including on-the-job training, for employees 

who are certified nurse aides. 

(C) APPLICATION.—To be eligible to receive a grant under 

this paragraph, a long-term care facility shall submit an 

application to the Secretary at such time, in such manner, 

and containing such information as the Secretary may require (which may include evidence of consultation with the 

State in which the long-term care facility is located with respect to carrying out activities funded under the grant). 

(D) AUTHORITY TO LIMIT NUMBER OF APPLICANTS.—Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed as prohibiting the 

Secretary from limiting the number of applicants for a 

grant under this paragraph. 

(E) ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEE DEFINED.—In this paragraph, 

the term ‘‘eligible employee’’ means an individual who establishes or implements management practices applicable 

with respect to individuals who provide direct care to residents of a long-term care facility and includes administrators, directors of nursing, staff developers, and charge 

nurses. 

(4) ACCOUNTABILITY MEASURES.—The Secretary shall develop 

accountability measures to ensure that the activities conducted 

using funds made available under this subsection benefit eligible employees and increase the stability of the long-term care 

workforce. 

(b) INFORMATICS SYSTEMS GRANT PROGRAM.— (1) GRANTS AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary is authorized to 

make grants to long-term care facilities for the purpose of assisting such entities in offsetting the costs related to purchasing, 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
53 

leasing, developing, and implementing standardized clinical 

health care informatics systems designed to improve patient 

safety and reduce adverse events and health care complications 

resulting from medication errors. 

(2) USE OF GRANT FUNDS.—Funds provided under grants 

under this subsection may be used for any of the following: 

(A) Purchasing, leasing, and installing computer software and hardware, including handheld computer technologies. 

(B) Making improvements to existing computer software 

and hardware. 

(C) Making upgrades and other improvements to existing 

computer software and hardware to enable e-prescribing. 

(D) Providing education and training to eligible longterm care facility staff on the use of technology to implement the electronic transmission of prescription and patient 

information. 

(3) APPLICATION.—To be eligible to receive a grant under this 

subsection, a long-term care facility shall submit an application 

to the Secretary at such time, in such manner, and containing 

such information as the Secretary may require (which may include evidence of consultation with the State in which the longterm care facility is located with respect to carrying out activities funded under the grant). 

(4) AUTHORITY TO LIMIT NUMBER OF APPLICANTS.—Nothing in 

this subsection shall be construed as prohibiting the Secretary 

from limiting the number of applicants for a grant under this 

subsection. 

(5) ACCOUNTABILITY MEASURES.—The Secretary shall develop 

accountability measures to ensure that the activities conducted 

using funds made available under this subsection help improve 

patient safety and reduce adverse events and health care complications resulting from medication errors. 

(c) INCLUSION OF ADJUDICATED CRIMES ON NURSING HOME COMPARE WEBSITE.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment 

of the Elder Justice Act, the Secretary shall ensure that the Department of Health and Human Services includes, as part of the information provided for comparison of nursing facilities on the official 

Internet website of the Federal Government for Medicare beneficiaries (commonly referred to as the ‘‘Nursing Home Compare’’ Medicare website), the number of adjudicated instances of criminal 

violations by a nursing facility or crimes committed by an employee 

of a nursing facility— (1) that were committed inside of the facility; and 

(2) with respect to such instances of violations or crimes committed outside of the facility, that were the violations or crimes 

of elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation, criminal sexual abuse 

of an elder, or other violations or crimes that resulted in the serious bodily injury of an elder. 

(d) DEVELOPMENT OF CONSUMER RIGHTS INFORMATION PAGE ON

NURSING HOME COMPARE WEBSITE.—Not later than 1 year after the 

date of enactment of the Elder Justice Act, the Secretary shall ensure that the Department of Health and Human Services, as part 

of the information provided for comparison of nursing facilities on 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
54 

the Nursing Home Compare Medicare website develops and includes 

a consumer rights information page that contains links to descriptions of, and information with respect to, the following: 

(1) The documentation on nursing facilities that is available 

to the public. 

(2) General information and tips on choosing a nursing facility that meets the needs of the individual. 

(3) General information on consumer rights with respect to 

nursing facilities. 

(4) The nursing facility survey process (on a national and 

State-specific basis). 

(5) On a State-specific basis, the services available through 

the State long-term care ombudsman for such State. 

(e) DEVELOPMENT AND ADOPTION OF STANDARDS FOR TRANSACTIONS INVOLVING CLINICAL DATA BY LONG-TERM CARE FACILITIES.—

(1) STANDARDS.—The Secretary shall develop and adopt uniform open electronic standards for transactions involving clinical data by long-term care facilities. Such standards shall include messaging and nomenclature standards. 

(2) COMPATIBILITY WITH OTHER STANDARDS.—The standards 

developed and adopted under paragraph (1) shall be compatible 

with standards established under part C of title XI, standards 

established under subsections (b)(2)(B)(i) and (e)(4) of section 

1860D–4, and with general health information technology 

standards. 

(3) ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION OF DATA TO THE SECRETARY.—

(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 10 years after the date 

of enactment of the Elder Justice Act, the Secretary shall 

have procedures in place to accept the optional electronic 

submission of clinical data by long-term care facilities pursuant to the standards developed and adopted under paragraph (1). 

(B) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this subsection 

shall be construed to require a long-term care facility to 

submit clinical data electronically to the Secretary. 

(f) REGULATIONS.—The Secretary shall promulgate regulations to 

carry out subsections (c), (d), and (e) of this section. Such regulations shall require a State, as a condition of the receipt of funds 

under this part, to conduct such data collection and reporting as the 

Secretary determines are necessary to satisfy the requirements of 

such subsections. 

(g) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There are authorized to 

be appropriated to carry out this section—

(1) for fiscal year 2007, $20,000,000; 

(2) for fiscal year 2008, $17,500,000; and 

(3) for each of fiscal years 2009 and 2010, $15,000,000. 

SEC. 2042. ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES FUNCTIONS AND GRANT 

PROGRAMS. 

(a) SECRETARIAL RESPONSIBILITIES.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall ensure that the Department of Health and Human Services—


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
55 

(A) provides funding authorized by this part to State and 

local adult protective services offices that investigate reports 

of the abuse, neglect, and exploitation of elders; 

(B) collects and disseminates data annually relating to 

the abuse, exploitation, and neglect of elders in coordination with the Department of Justice; 

(C) develops and disseminates information on best practices regarding, and provides training on, carrying out 

adult protective services; 

(D) conducts research related to the provision of adult 

protective services; and 

(E) provides technical assistance to States and other entities that provide or fund the provision of adult protective 

services, including through grants made under subsections 

(b) and (c). 

(2) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this subsection, $3,000,000 

for fiscal year 2007 and $4,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2008 

through 2010. 

(b) GRANTS TO ENHANCE THE PROVISION OF ADULT PROTECTIVE

SERVICES.— (1) ESTABLISHMENT.—There is established an adult protective 

services grant program under which the Secretary shall annually award grants to States in the amounts calculated under 

paragraph (2) for the purposes of enhancing adult protective 

services provided by States and local units of government. 

(2) AMOUNT OF PAYMENT.— (A) IN GENERAL.—Subject to the availability of appropriations and subparagraphs (B) and (C), the amount paid 

to a State for a fiscal year under the program under this 

subsection shall equal the amount appropriated for that 

year to carry out this subsection multiplied by the percentage of the total number of elders who reside in the United 

States who reside in that State. 

(B) GUARANTEED MINIMUM PAYMENT AMOUNT.— (i) 50 STATES.—Subject to clause (ii), if the amount 

determined under subparagraph (A) for a State for a 

fiscal year is less than 0.75 percent of the amount appropriated for such year, the Secretary shall increase 

such determined amount so that the total amount paid 

under this subsection to the State for the year is equal 

to 0.75 percent of the amount so appropriated. 

(ii) TERRITORIES.—In the case of a State other than 

1 of the 50 States, clause (i) shall be applied as if each 

reference to ‘‘0.75’’ were a reference to ‘‘0.1’’. 

(C) PRO RATA REDUCTIONS.—The Secretary shall make 

such pro rata reductions to the amounts described in subparagraph (A) as are necessary to comply with the requirements of subparagraph (B). 

(3) AUTHORIZED ACTIVITIES.— (A) ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES.—Funds made available pursuant to this subsection may only be used by States 

and local units of government to provide adult protective 

services and may not be used for any other purpose. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
56 

(B) USE BY AGENCY.—Each State receiving funds pursuant to this subsection shall provide such funds to the agency or unit of State government having legal responsibility 

for providing adult protective services within the State. 

(C) SUPPLEMENT NOT SUPPLANT.—Each State or local 

unit of government shall use funds made available pursuant to this subsection to supplement and not supplant other 

Federal, State, and local public funds expended to provide 

adult protective services in the State. 

(4) STATE REPORTS.—Each State receiving funds under this 

subsection shall submit to the Secretary, at such time and in 

such manner as the Secretary may require, a report on the 

number of elders served by the grants awarded under this subsection. 

(5) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this subsection, 

$100,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2007 through 2010. 

(c) STATE DEMONSTRATION PROGRAMS.—

(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Secretary shall award grants to 

States for the purposes of conducting demonstration programs 

in accordance with paragraph (2). 

(2) DEMONSTRATION PROGRAMS.—Funds made available pursuant to this subsection may be used by States and local units 

of government to conduct demonstration programs that test—

(A) training modules developed for the purpose of detecting or preventing elder abuse; 

(B) methods to detect or prevent financial exploitation of 

elders; 

(C) methods to detect elder abuse; 

(D) whether training on elder abuse forensics enhances 

the detection of elder abuse by employees of the State or 

local unit of government; or 

(E) other matters relating to the detection or prevention 

of elder abuse. 

(3) APPLICATION.—To be eligible to receive a grant under this 

subsection, a State shall submit an application to the Secretary 

at such time, in such manner, and containing such information 

as the Secretary may require. 

(4) STATE REPORTS.—Each State that receives funds under 

this subsection shall submit a report to the Secretary at such 

time, in such manner, and containing such information as the 

Secretary may require on the results of the demonstration program conducted by the State using funds made available under 

this subsection. 

(5) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this subsection, $25,000,000 

for each of fiscal years 2007 through 2010. 

SEC. 2043. LONG-TERM CARE OMBUDSMAN PROGRAM GRANTS AND 

TRAINING. 

(a) GRANTS TO SUPPORT THE LONG-TERM CARE OMBUDSMAN PROGRAM.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall make grants to eligible 

entities with relevant expertise and experience in abuse and neVerDate Aug 31 2005 21:37 Sep 22, 2006 Jkt 004910 PO 00000 Frm 00056 Fmt 6602 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\SR337.XXX SR337

hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
57 

glect in long-term care facilities or long-term care ombudsman 

programs and responsibilities, for the purpose of— (A) improving the capacity of State long-term care ombudsman programs to respond to and resolve complaints 

about abuse and neglect; 

(B) conducting pilot programs with State long-term care 

ombudsman offices or local ombudsman entities; and 

(C) providing support for such State long-term care ombudsman programs and such pilot programs (such as 

through the establishment of a national long-term care ombudsman resource center). 

(2) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this subsection— (A) for fiscal year 2007, $5,000,000; 

(B) for fiscal year 2008, $7,500,000; and 

(C) for each of fiscal years 2009 and 2010, $10,000,000. 

(b) OMBUDSMAN TRAINING PROGRAMS.— (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall establish programs to 

provide and improve ombudsman training with respect to elder 

abuse, neglect, and exploitation for national organizations and 

State long-term care ombudsman programs. 

(2) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this subsection, for each of 

fiscal years 2007 through 2010, $10,000,000. 

PART C—COLLECTION OF DATA, DISSEMINATION OF 

INFORMATION, AND STUDIES 

SEC. 2051. COLLECTION OF UNIFORM NATIONAL DATA ON ELDER 

ABUSE, NEGLECT, AND EXPLOITATION. 

(a) PURPOSE.—The purpose of this section is to improve, streamline, and promote uniform collection, maintenance, and dissemination of national data relating to the various types of elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation. 

(b) PHASE I—DEVELOPMENT.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than the date that is 1 year after 

the date of enactment of the Elder Justice Act, the Secretary, 

after consultation with the Attorney General, shall develop—

(A) a method for collecting national data regarding elder 

abuse, neglect, and exploitation; and 

(B) uniform national data reporting forms adapted to 

each relevant entity or discipline (such as health, public 

safety, social and protective services, and law enforcement) 

reflecting—

(i) the distinct manner in which each entity or discipline receives and maintains information; and 

(ii) the sequence and history of reports to, or involvement of, different entities or disciplines, independently, 

or the sequence and history of reports from 1 entity or 

discipline to another over time. 

(2) FORMS.—Subject to the requirements of section 2012(a), 

the national data reporting forms described in paragraph (1)(B) 

shall incorporate the definitions of this subtitle for use in determining whether an event is reportable. 

(c) PHASE II—PILOT TESTS.—


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
58 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than the date that is 1 year after 

the date on which the activities described in subsection (b)(1) 

are completed, the Secretary shall ensure that the national data 

reporting forms and data collection methods developed in accordance with such subsection are pilot tested in 6 States selected by the Secretary. 

(2) ADJUSTMENTS TO THE FORM AND METHODS.—The Secretary, after considering the results of the pilot testing described 

in paragraph (1) and consultation with the Attorney General, 

shall adjust the national data reporting forms and data collection methods as necessary. 

(d) PHASE III—NATIONAL DISTRIBUTION.—

(1) DISTRIBUTION OF NATIONAL DATA REPORTING FORMS.—

After completion of the adjustment to the national data reporting forms under subsection (c)(2), the Secretary shall submit the 

national data reporting forms along with instructions to—

(A) the heads of the relevant Federal entities as may be 

appropriate; and 

(B) the appropriate office of each State for collection from 

all relevant State entities of data, including health care, social services, and law enforcement data. 

(2) DATA COLLECTION GRANTS.—

(A) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary is authorized to 

award grants to States to improve data collection activities 

relating to elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation. 

(B) APPLICATION.—To be eligible to receive a grant under 

this paragraph, a State shall submit an application to the 

Secretary at such time, in such manner, and containing 

such information as the Secretary may require. 

(C) REQUIREMENTS.—Each State receiving a grant under 

this paragraph for a fiscal year shall report data for the 

calendar year that begins during that fiscal year, using the 

national data reporting forms described in paragraph (1). 

(D) FUNDING.—

(i) FIRST YEAR.—For the first fiscal year for which a 

State receives grant funds under this paragraph, the 

Secretary shall initially distribute 50 percent of such 

funds to the State. The Secretary shall distribute the 

remaining funds to the State at the end of the calendar 

year that begins during that fiscal year, if the Secretary determines that the State has properly reported 

data required under this paragraph for the calendar 

year. 

(ii) SUBSEQUENT YEARS.—Except as provided in 

clause (i), the Secretary shall distribute grant funds to 

a State under this paragraph for a fiscal year if the 

Secretary determines that the State properly reported 

data required under this paragraph for the calendar 

year that ends during that fiscal year. 

(E) REQUIRED INFORMATION.—Each report submitted 

under this paragraph shall—

(i) indicate the State and year in which each event 

occurred; and 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
59 

(ii) identify the total number of events that occurred 

in each State during the year and the type of each 

event. 

(e) REPORT.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of 

the Elder Justice Act and annually thereafter, the Secretary shall 

prepare and submit to the Committee on Finance of the Senate and 

the Committee on Ways and Means and the Committee on Energy 

and Commerce of the House of Representatives a report regarding 

activities conducted under this section. 

(f) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There are authorized to 

be appropriated to carry out this section—

(1) for fiscal year 2007, $10,000,000; 

(2) for fiscal year 2008, $30,000,000; and 

(3) for each of fiscal years 2009 and 2010, $100,000,000. 

SEC. 2052. LONG-TERM CARE CONSUMER CLEARINGHOUSE. 

(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Secretary shall establish a long-term 

care consumer clearinghouse. 

(b) INFORMATION.—The clearinghouse shall provide comprehensive detailed information, in a consumer-friendly form, to consumers about choices relating to long-term care providers, such as 

information about—

(1) obtaining the services of, and employing, caregivers who 

provide long-term care at an individual’s home; and 

(2) options for residential long-term care, such as—

(A)(i) the type of care provided by nursing facilities; and 

(ii) the type of care provided by group homes and other 

residential long-term care facilities that are not nursing facilities; 

(B) the benefits related to long-term care that are available through the programs carried out under titles XVIII 

and XIX; and 

(C) links to Federal and State Internet websites that describe the care available through specific long-term care facilities, including data on the satisfaction level of residents 

of, and families of residents of, the facilities. 

(c) PROVIDERS.—In providing information on long-term care providers under this section, the clearinghouse shall provide information (from States and other sources) on assisted living facilities, 

board and care facilities, congregate care facilities, home health 

care providers, and other long-term care providers. 

(d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There are authorized to 

be appropriated to carry out this section—

(1) for fiscal year 2007, $2,000,000; 

(2) for fiscal year 2008, $3,000,000; and 

(3) for each of fiscal years 2009 and 2010, $4,000,000. 

SEC. 2053. CONSUMER INFORMATION ABOUT THE CONTINUUM OF RESIDENTIAL LONG-TERM CARE FACILITIES. 

(a) STUDY.— (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary, after consultation with the 

Attorney General, shall, directly or through a grant, conduct a 

study on consumer concerns relating to residential long-term 

care facilities, other than nursing facilities. 

(2) SPECIFIC TOPICS.—The entity conducting the study shall—


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
60 

(A) develop definitions for classes of the residential longterm care facilities described in paragraph (1); and 

(B) collect information on the prices of, level of services 

provided by, oversight and enforcement provisions of, and 

admission and discharge criteria of, the facilities. 

(b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There are authorized to 

be appropriated to carry out this section, for each of fiscal years 

2007 through 2010, $3,000,000. 

SEC. 2054. PROVISION OF INFORMATION REGARDING, AND EVALUATIONS OF, ELDER JUSTICE PROGRAMS. 

(a) PROVISION OF INFORMATION.—To be eligible to receive a grant 

under this part, an applicant shall agree— (1) except as provided in paragraph (2), to provide the eligible 

entity conducting an evaluation under subsection (b) of the activities funded through the grant with such information as the 

eligible entity may require in order to conduct such evaluation; 

or 

(2) in the case of an applicant for a grant under section 

2041(b), to provide the Secretary with such information as the 

Secretary may require to conduct an evaluation or audit under 

subsection (c). 

(b) USE OF ELIGIBLE ENTITIES TO CONDUCT EVALUATIONS.— (1) EVALUATIONS REQUIRED.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), the Secretary shall— (A) reserve a portion (not less than 2 percent) of the funds 

appropriated with respect to each program carried out 

under this part; and 

(B) use the funds reserved under subparagraph (A) to 

provide assistance to eligible entities to conduct evaluations 

of the activities funded under each program carried out 

under this part. 

(2) INFORMATICS SYSTEMS GRANT PROGRAM NOT INCLUDED.— The provisions of this subsection shall not apply to the 

informatics systems grant program under section 2041(b). 

(3) AUTHORIZED ACTIVITIES.—A recipient of assistance described in paragraph (1)(B) shall use the funds made available 

through the assistance to conduct a validated evaluation of the 

effectiveness of the activities funded under a program carried 

out under this part. 

(4) APPLICATIONS.—To be eligible to receive assistance under 

paragraph (1)(B), an entity shall submit an application to the 

Secretary at such time, in such manner, and containing such 

information as the Secretary may require, including a proposal 

for the evaluation. 

(5) REPORTS.—Not later than a date specified by the Secretary, an eligible entity receiving assistance under paragraph 

(1)(B) shall submit to the Secretary, the Committee on Ways 

and Means and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the 

House of Representatives, and the Committee on Finance of the 

Senate a report containing the results of the evaluation conducted using such assistance together with such recommendations as the entity determines to be appropriate. 

(c) EVALUATIONS AND AUDITS OF INFORMATICS SYSTEMS GRANT

PROGRAM BY THE SECRETARY.—


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
61 

(1) EVALUATIONS.—The Secretary shall conduct an evaluation 

of the activities funded under the informatics systems grant 

program under section 2041(b). Such evaluation shall include 

an evaluation of whether the funding provided under the grant 

is expended only for the purposes for which it is made. 

(2) AUDITS.—The Secretary shall conduct appropriate audits 

of grants made under section 2041(b). 

SEC. 2055. REPORT. 

Not later than October 1, 2011, the Secretary shall submit to the 

Elder Justice Coordinating Council, the Committee on Finance of 

the Senate, and the Committee on Ways and Means and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives a 

report—

(1) compiling, summarizing, and analyzing the information 

contained in the State reports submitted under subsections 

(b)(4) and (c)(4) of section 2042; and 

(2) containing—

(A) the results of the study conducted under section 2053; 

and 

(B) such recommendations for legislative or administrative action as the Secretary determines to be appropriate.’’

* * * * * * * 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING