+(,121/,1(

Citation: 72 Fed. Reg. 26718 2007 

Content downloaded/printed from 

HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org)

Fri Jul 30 17:51:26 2010

-- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance

 of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license

 agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License

-- The search text of this PDF is generated from 

 uncorrected OCR text.
Federal Register/Vol. 72, No. 91 / Friday, May 11, 2007/Rules and Regulations

Affected ADs

(b) None.

Applicability

(c) This AD applies to Model 750XL

airplanes, serial numbers 125, 126, and 127,

certificated in any category.

Subject

(d) Air Transport Association of America

(ATA) Code 22: Autopilot.

Reason

(e) The mandatory continuing

airworthiness information (MCAI) states:

* * * failure of the Autopilot System

Computer resulting in the possibility of an

out of trim condition, which may lead to loss

of aircraft control* * *

Actions and Compliance

(f) Unless already done, do the following

actions before further flight.

(1) Modify the autopilot pitch trim circuit

with additional protective features following

Pacific Aerospace Limited Mandatory ServicE

Bulletin PACSB/XL/025, dated March 5,

2007.

(2) Inspect the Pitch Servo to confirm part

number (P/N) 108-15-Pl is installed

following Pacific Aerospace Limited

Mandatory Service Bulletin PACSB/XL/025,

dated March 5, 2007.

(i) If Pitch Servo P/N 108-15-Pi is

installed, no further action is necessary.

(ii) If Pitch Servo P/N 108-15-Pl is not

installed, replace the Pitch Servo with P/N

108-15-P1 following Pacific Aerospace

Limited Mandatory Service Bulletin PACSB/

XL/025, dated March 5, 2007.

FAA AD Differences

Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/

or service information as follows:

(1) The MCAI requires an interim action of

disconnecting the autopilot following Pacific

Aerospace Limited Alert Service Bulletin

PACSB/XL/001, dated February 16, 2007.

Since there are no products of this type

currently registered in the United States, and

Pacific Aerospace Limited Mandatory Servici

Bulletin PACSB/XL/025, dated March 5,

2007, supersedes Pacific Aerospace Limited

Alert Service Bulletin PACSB/XL001, dated

February 16, 2007, we are not requiring

disconnection of the autopilot. Instead we

require the autopilot comply with the

terminating actions in Pacific Aerospace

Limited Mandatory Service Bulletin PACSB/

XL/025, dated March 5, 2007.

(2) The MCAI allows modification of the

pitch trim circuit within 150 hours time-inservice. Since there are no products of this

type currently registered in the United States

we are requiring modification of the pitch

trim circuit before a domestic airworthiness

certificate can be issued,

Other FAA AD Provisions

(g) The following provisions also apply to

this AD:

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance

(AMOCs): The Manager, Small Airplane

Directorate, FAA, has the authority to

approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested

using the pr6cedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.

Send information to ATTN: Karl

Schletzbaum, Aerospace Engineer, 901

Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri

64106; telephone: (816) 329-4146; fax: (816)

329-4090. Before using any approved AMOC

on any airplane to which the AMOC applies,

notify your appropriate principal inspector

(PI) in the FAA Fliglht Standards District

Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local

FSDO.

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement

in this AD to obtain corrective actions from

a manufacturer or other source, use these

actions if they are FAA-appro;ed. Corrective

actions are considered FAA-approved if they

are approved by the State of Design Authority

(or their delegated agent). You are required

to assure the product is airworthy before it

is returned to service.

(3) Reporting Requirements: For any

reporting requirement in this AD, under the

provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act

(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of

Management and Budget (OMB) has

approved the information collection

requirements and has assigned OMB Control

Number 2120-0056.

Related Information

(h) Refer to MCAI Civil Aviation Authority

of New Zealand AD DCA/750XL/12A,

drafted: March 27, 2007, effective date:

March 29, 2007' and Pacific Aerospace

Limited Mandatory Service Bulletin PACSB/

XL/025, dated March 5, 2007, for related

information.

Material Incorporated by Reference

(i) You must use Pacific Aerospace Limited

Mandatory Service Bulletin PACSB/XL/025,

dated March 5, 2007, to do the actions

required by this AD, unless the AD.specifies

otherwise.

(1) The.Director of the Federal Register

approved the incorporation by reference of

this service information under 5 U.S.C.

e 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.

1 (2) For service information identified in

this AD, contact Pacific Aerospace Limited,

Hamilton Airport, Private Bag HN3027,

Hamilton, New Zealand; telephone: (64) 7-

843-6144; fax: (64) 7-843-6134.

(3) You may review copies at the FAA,

Central Region, Office of the Regional

Counsel, 901 Locust, Room 506, Kansas City,

Missouri 64106; or at the National Archives

and Records Administration (NARA). For

information on the availability of this

material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go

to: http://www.archives.gov/federaLregister/

code of-federalregulations/

ibrlocations.html.

Issued in Kansas City, Missouri on May 4,

2007.

Charles L. Smalley,

Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,

Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. E7-8993 Filed 5-10-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P

ENVIONMETAL ROTETIO

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 52 and 81

[EPA-R09-OAA-2007-0101; FRL-8308-4]

Approval and Promulgation of

Implementation Plans and Designation

of Areas for Air Quality Planning

Purposes: California

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: EPA is granting a request

submitted by the State to redesignate the

South Coast from nonattainment to

attainment for the CO National Ambient

Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). EPA is

also approving a state implementation

plan (SIP) revision for the South Coast

nonattainment area in California as

meeting the Clean Air Act (CAA)

requirements for maintenance plans for

carbon monoxide (CO). EPA is finding

adequate and approving motor vehicle

emission budgets, which are included in

the maintenance plan. Finally, EPA is

approving the California motor vehicle

inspection and maintenance

(I/M) program as meeting the low

enhanced I/M requirements for CO in

the South Coast.

DATES: Effective Date: This rule is

effective on June 11, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the documents

relevant to this action are available for

public inspection during normal

business hours at EPA Region 9's Air

Planning Office (AIR-2), 75 Hawthorne

Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901.

Due to increased security, we suggest

that you call at least 24 hours prior to

visiting the Regional Office so that we

can make arrangements to have

someone meet you.

Electronic Availability

This document and our proposed

rule, which was published on February

14, 2007, are also available at

www.regulations.gov for docket number

EPA-R09-OAR-2 007-0101.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

David Jesson, U.S. EPA Region 9, 415-

972-3961, david.jesson@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Throughout this document, the terms

"we," "us," and "our" mean U.S. EPA.

Table of Contents

I. Proposed Action

I. Public Comments

. 1. Final Action

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

26718

HeinOnline -- 72 Fed. Reg. 26718 2007
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 91 / Friday, May 11, 2007/ Rules and Regulations

I. Proposed Action

On February 14, 2007 (72 FR 6986),

we proposed to approve the 2005

Carbon Monoxide Redesignation

Request and Carbon Monoxide

Maintenance Plan for the South Coast

Air Basin (Maintenance Plan) as

meeting the requirements of CAA

sections 107(d)(3)(E) and 175A. We also

proposed to approve and find adequate

the motor vehicle emissions budgets

(MVEBs) submitted with the

Maintenance Plan.

We proposed to approve the requbst

by the State of California to redesignate

the area to attainment for CO under the

provisions of CAA section 107(d)(3)(E).

Section 107(d)(3)(E) authorizes the EPA

Administrator to redesignate areas to

attainment if the area has attained the

NAAQS due to permanent and

enforceable emission reductions, and

the approved SIP for the area meets all

of the applicable requirements of CAA

section 110 (basic requirements

applicable to SIPs generally), Part D

(special SIP requirements applicable to

nonattainment areas), and 175A (SIP

requirements for maintenance areas).

As part of our proposed determination

that California has met applicable Part

D provisions, -we proposed to adapt to

CO nonattainment areas the provisions

of our Clean Data Policy, which was

initially established for ozone (see

discussion at 72 FR 6989). Under the

Clean Data Policy, certain CAA Part D

requirements-including the

requirements for developing attainment

demonstrations, reasonable further

progress (RFP) plans, reasonably

available control measures (RACM) and

contingency measures-no longer apply

because the area has already attained

the NAAQS.

Finally, because our interim approval

of California's I/M program for CO in

the South Coast expired on August 7,

1998, California submitted a

demonstration that the I/M program

meets the low-enhanced requirements

applicable to the South Coast CO

nonattainment area (see discussion in

section III.B.4. We proposed to approve

that demonstration.

U. Public Comments

. Our February 14, 2007 proposed rule

provided a 30-day public comment

period, which closed on March 16,

2007. We received no comments on our

proposal during this period.

III. Final Action

We are taking final action to

redesignate the South Coast from

nonattainment to attainment for the CO,

National Ambient Air Quality Standards;

(NAAQS) under CAA section

107(d)(3)(E).

We are approving the following SIP

revision as meeting the Clean Air Act

(CAA) requirements for maintenance

plans for carbon monoxide (CO) under

CAA section 175A: 2005 Carbon

Monoxide Redesignation Request and

Carbon Monoxide Maintenance Plan for

the South Coast Air Basin, adopted by

the SCAQMD on March 4, 2005, and

adopted and submitted by the CARB on

February 24, 2006.1

We are approving Appendix V, page

V-5-4, Table 5-2-"Carbon Monoxide

Emissions (tons/day) Projected from

1993 through 2000 for the South Coast

Air Basin," in the 1997 CO Plan for the

Sou'th Coast, adopted by SCAQMD on

November 15, 1996, and adopted and

submitted by CARB on February 5,

1997, as meeting the requirements of

CAA section 187(b)(2) relating to

transportation control measures to offset

emissions associated with growth in

vehicle miles traveled and vehicle trips.

We are finding adequate and

approving under CAA section 176(c) the

following motor vehicle emission

budgets included in the maintenance

plan: 2888 tons per day of CO for 2005,

and 2137 tons per day of CO for 2010,

2015, and 2020.

We are approving the State's

demonstration that the California motor

vehicle inspection and maintenance

(I/M) program meets the low enhanced

I/M requirements for CO in the South

Coast under CAA section 187(a)(6). The

State's I/M program submittal of January

22, 1996, remains an approved part of

the SIP, following its approval on

January 8, 1997 (62 FR 1150).

IV. Statutory and Executive Order

Reviews

Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR

51735, October 4, 1993), this action is

not a "significant regulatory action" and

therefore is not subject to review by the

Office of Management and Budget. For

this reason, this action is also not

subject to Executive Order 13211,

(Actions Concerning Regulations That

Significantly Affect Energy Supply,

Distribution, or Use" (66 FR 28355, May

22, 2001). This action merely approves

changes to state law as meeting Federal

requirements, and imposes no

additional requirements beyond those

imposed by state law. Accordingly, the

Administrator certifies that this rule

will not have a significant economic

impact on a substantial number of small

' A letter from CARB dated August 11, 2006,

contained information related to the enhanced I/M

progrhni, but we &e hot inc6rporating thig letter in

the.approved SIP. -, "', , . .. !,,,

entities under the Regulatory Flexibility

Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this

rule approves pre-existing requirements

under state law and does not impose

any additional enforceable duty beyond

that required by state law, it does not

contain any unfunded mandate or

significantly or uniquely affect small

governments, as described in the

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

(Pub. L. 104-4).

This rule also does not have tribal

implications because it will not have a

substantial direct effect on one or more

Indian tribes, on the relationship

between the Federal Government and

Indian tribes, or on the distribution of

power and responsilfilities between the

Federal Government and Indian tribes,

as specified by Executive Order 13175

(65 FR 97249, November 9, 2000), nor

will it have substantial direct effects on

the States, on the relationship between

the national government and the States,

or on the distribution of power and

responsibilities among the various

levels of government, as specified in

Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,

August 10, 1999), because it merely

approves a State rule implementing a

Federal standard, and does not alter the

relationship or the distribution of power

and responsibilities established in the

CAA. This rule also is not subject to

Executive Order 13045 "Protection of

Children from Environmental Health

Risks and Safety Risks" (62 FR 19885,

April 23, 1997), because it approves a

state plan implementing a Federal

Standard.

In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's

role is to approve state choices,

provided that they meet the criteria of

the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the

absence of a prior existing requirement

for the state to use voluntary consensus

standards (VCS), EPA has no authority

to disapprove a SIP submission for

failure to use VCS. It would thus be

inconsistent with applicable law for

EPA, when it reviews a SIP, to use VCS

in place of a SIP submission that

otherwise satisfies the provisions of the

Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements of

section 12(d) of the National

Technology Transfer and Advancement

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not

apply.

The Congressional Review Act, 5

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as.added by the Small

Business Regulatory Enforcement

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides

that before a rule may take effect, the

agency promulgating the rule must

submit a rule report, which includes a

copy of the rule, to each House of the

Congress and to the Comptroller General

of the United States. EPA will submit a

report containing this rule and other

26719

HeinOnline -- 72 Fed. Reg. 26719 2007
Federal Register/Vol. 72, No. 91/Friday, May 11, 2007/Rules and Regulations

required information to the U.S. Senate,

the U.S. House of Representatives, and

the Comptroller General of the United

States prior to publication of the rule in

the Federal Register. A major rule

cannot take effect until 60 days after it

is published in the Federal Register.

This action is not a major rule as

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of

this action must be filed in the United

States Court of Appeals for the

appropriate circuit by July 10, 2007.

Filing a petition for reconsideration by

the Administrator of this final rule does

not affect the finality of this rule for the

purposes of judicial review nor does it

extend the time within which a petition

for judicial review may be filed, and

shall not postpone the effectiveness of

such rule or action. This action may not

be challenged later in proceedings to

enforce its requirements. (See section

307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects

40 CFR Part 52

Environmental protection, Air

pollution control, Carbon monoxide,

Intergovernmental relations, Reporting

and recordkeeping requirements.

40 CFR Part 81

Environmental protection, Air

pollution control, National parks,

Wilderness areas.

Dated: April 24, 2007.

Wayne Nastri,

Regional Administrator; Region 9.

0 40 CFR parts 52 and 81 are amended

as follows:

PART 52-[AMENDED]

m 1. The authority citation for part 52

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart F-California

* 2. Section 52.220 is amended by

adding subparagraph (c)(247)(i)(A)(6)

and adding paragraph (c)(346) to read as

follows:

§ 52.220 Identification of plan.

(c) * * *

(247) * * * (i) * * *

(A) * * *

(6) Appendix V, page V-5-4, Table 5-

2-"Carbon Monoxide Emissions (tons/

day) Projected from 1993 through 2000

for the South Coast Air Basin." * * * * *

(346) New and amended plans for the

following AQMD were submitted on

February 24, 2006, by the Governor's

designee.

(i) Incorporation by reference.

(A) South Coast Air Quality

Management District (SCAQMD).

(1) 2005 Carbon Monoxide

Redesignation Request and Maintenance

Plan for the South Coast Air Basin, as

adopted by SCAQMD on March 4, 2005,

and by California Air Resources Board

on February 24, 2006.

PART 81-[AMENDED]

m 1, The authority citation for part 81

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart C-[Amended]

0 2. In § 81.305, the table "CaliforniaCarbon Monoxide" is amended by

revising the entry for "Los AngelesSouth Coast Air Basin Area" to read as

follows:

§81.305 California. * * * * *

CALIFORNIA-CARBON MONOXIDE

Designation Classification

Designated area Date Type Date Type

Los Angeles-South Coast Air Basin Area ...............................

Los Angeles County (part)-that portion of Los Angeles

County which lies South and west of a line described as

follows:

1. Beginning at the Los Angeles-San Bernardino County

boundary and running west along the township line

common to Township 3 North and Township 2 North,

San Bernardino Baseand Meridian;

2. Then north along the range line common to Range 8

West and Range 9 West;

3. Then west along the township line common to Township 4 North and Township 3 North;

4. Then north along the range line common to Range

12 West and Range 13 West to the southeast corner

of Section 12, Township 5 North and Range 13 West;

5. Then west along the south boundaries of Sections

12, 11, 10, 9, 8, and 7, Township 5 North and Range

13 West to the boundary of the Angeles National Forest which is collinear with the range line common to

Range 13 West and Range 14 West;

6. Then north and west along the Angeles National Forest boundary to the point of intersection with the

township line common to Township 7 North and

Township 6 North (point is at the northwest corner of

Section 4 in Township 6 North and Range 14 West);

7. Tthen west along the township line common to Township 7 North and Township 6 North;

8. Then north along the range line common to Range

15 West and Range 16 West to the southeast corner

of Section 13, Township 7 North and Range 16 West;

6/11/07 Attainment.

26720

HeinOnline -- 72 Fed. Reg. 26720 2007
Federal Register/Vol. 72, No. 91/Friday, May 11, 2007'/Rules and Regulations

CALIFORNIA-CARBON MONOXIDE-Continued.

Designation Classification Designated area

Date1 Type Date Type

9. Then along the south boundaries of Sections 13, 14,

15, 16, 17, and 18, Township 7 North and Range 16

West;

10. Then north along the range line common to Range

16 West and Range 17 West to the north boundary of

the Angeles National Forest (collinear with the township line common to Township 8 North and Township

7 North);

11. Then west along the Angeles National Forest

boundary to the point of intersection with the south

boundary of the Rancho La Liebre Land Grant;

12. Then west and north along this land grant boundary

to the Los Angeles-Kern County boundary.

Orange County:

Riverside County (part)-that portion of Riverside .County

which lies to the west of a line described as follows:

1. Beginning at the Riverside-San Diego County

boundary and running north along the range line common to Range 4 East and Range 3 East, San

Bernardino Base and Meridian;

2. Then east along the township line common to Township 8 South and Township 7 South;

3. Then north along the range line common to Range 5

East and Range 4 East;

4. Then west along the township line common to Township 6 South and Township 7 South to the southwest

corner of Section 34, Township 6 South, Range 4

East;

5. Then north along the west boundaries of Sections 34,

27, 22, 15, 10, and 3, Township 6 South, Range 4

East;

6. Then west along the township line common to Township 5 South and Township 6 South;

7. Then north along the range line common to Range 4

East and Range 3 East;

8. Then west along the south boundaries of Sections

13, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18, Township 5 South, Range

3 East;

9. Then north along the range line common to Range 2

East and Range 3 East to the Riverside-San

Bernardino county line.

San Bernardino County-that portion of San Bernardino

County Which lies south and west of a line described as

follows:

1. Beginning at the San Bemardino-Riverside County

boundary and running north along the range line common to Range 3 East and Range 2 East, San

Bernardino Base and Meridian;

2. Then west along the township line common to Township 3 North and Township 2 North to the San

Bemardino-Los Angeles County boundary.

This date is November 15, 1990, unless otherwise noted.

[FR Doc. E7-8673 Filed 5-10-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

26721

HeinOnline -- 72 Fed. Reg. 26721 2007