alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*November 16, 2007*

[Cite as *11/16/2007 Case Announcements,*2007-Ohio-6083.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2005-1316.

#### State v. Frazier.

Lucas C.P. No. CR04-1509. This cause came on for further consideration of appellant’s motion for stay of execution scheduled for January 15, 2008. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted.

It is further ordered that this stay shall remain in effect until exhaustion of all state post-conviction proceedings, including any appeals.

It is further ordered that counsel for appellant and for the appellee shall notify this court when all proceedings for post-conviction relief before the courts of this state have been exhausted.
cr h c 'U' 4, \\.' i\1 C) li"' N f) It\\' ft f) I) 

Commonwealth oj Massachusetts 

OFFICE ADDRESS 

125 Access Road 

Norwood, MA 02062 

Norwood Memorial Airport 

Russ Maguire, A.A.E., ACE, Airport Manager . 

HAND DELIVERED· AND BY ELECTRONIC MAIL 

July 19, 2013 

Boston Executive Helicopters 

Attn: Chris Donovan, President 

125 Access Road 

Norwood, MA 02062 

RE: Boston Executive Helicopters' Fuel Farm 

Dear Chris: 

MAILING ADDRESS 

125 Access Road 

Norwood , MA 02062 

As a matter of record: During its monthly public meeting held Wednesday, July 17, 2013, the 

Norwood Airport Commission (NAC) met with your company, Boston Executive Helicopters 

(BEH), to specifically resolve two outstanding matters. These involved: 

1. FAA's design standard relative to the Norwood Airport's gate 3 taxi-lane object free area 

(TOFA), as it applies to your company's construction and operational plans; 

2. BEH's fueling plans and procedures with respect to the TOFA, and the abutting property 

interests of others 

Regarding the NAC's first concern, as indicated in Wednesday's meeting, the board considers 

this matter resolved. As for the second concern, at Wednesday's meeting, your company 

delivered to the Airport Commission documents that now more comprehensively address BEH's 

fueling plans and procedures, especially with . respect to the TOFA and the abutting property 

interests of others. 

Following your company's presentation Wednesday, the NAC approved the continuation of 

your company's hangar construction and fuel farm installation. 

Phone: (781) 255-5616 I Fax: ( 81 ) 255- 617 I rmaguire@norwoodrna.gov 
/ 

However, as noted in the meeting, BEH still needs to deliver to the NAC additional documents 

and revised plans, which your company has agreed to. These documents would include: 

I. A revised fuel storage drawing(s), which you've indicated has already been approved by 

the Norwood Fire Department and Board of Selectmen; 

2. A foundation plan; 

3. A shoring plan; 

4. A copy of BEH's filing to the Norwood Conservation Commission (Con Com) showing 

the spill containment properties of your fuel fann, which you've indicated as having met 

the approval of the Norwood Con Com; 

5. An updated construction schedule 

Per Wednesday's meeting, BEH has furthermore agreed to an aircraft fueling restriction east of 

its leasehold since this involves abutting leaseholds; and this restriction will remain in place until 

such time that BEH can demonstrate to the Airport Commission that the property rights of others 

will not be violated. 

Finally, on behalf of the board, thanks very much for taking the time at Wednesday's meeting to 

more fully explain BEH's plans. Good luck as your company moves forward with construction. 

Sincerely, 

~~ Russ Maguire, Manager 

Norwood Memorial Airport 

Cc: Norwood Airport Commission,· Norwood Board of Selectmen,· John Carroll, Norwood 

Town Manager,· Chief Tony Greeley, Norwood Fire Department,· A! Goetz, Agent, 

Norwood Conservation Commission
Dismissed and Opinion Filed July 21, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 11

- 01545

- CV
BROYHILL FURNITURE INDUSTRIES , Appellant V. RANDY MURPHY AND DAVE SHAFFER , Appellee s On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 08

- 13276

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Partida

- Kipness, and Garcia Opinion by Justice Partida

- Kipness We reinstate this appeal. In 2013, we abated this case due to Broyhill Furniture

Industries’ bankruptcy. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 8.2. The Court conducted an independent
review of the federal Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) system , which does not show a pending bankruptcy case associated with this appeal

. We notified the parties by letter, requesting they inform the Court of the status
of the bankruptcy and of this appeal. We cautioned that the failure to respond would
result in the appeal being dismissed for want of prosecution. See id . 42.3(b),(c). To
date, neither party has responded.– 2

–

Because we gave the parties an opportunity to show why we should not
dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution and no one resp onded, we dismiss this
appeal. See id . 42.3(b),(c); Brewer v. Admiral Ins. Co ., 2002 WL 313129 90, at *1
(Tex. App.

— Dallas Oct. 16, 2002, no writ) (per curiam) (not designated for
publication).

111545f.p05 /Robbie Partida

- Kipness/ ROBBIE PARTIDA

- KIPNESS JUSTICE– 3

– 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

BROYHILL FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, Appellant

No. 05

- 11

- 01545

- CV V.

RANDY MURPHY AND DAVE SHAFFER, Appellees On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 08

- 13276. Opinion delivered by Justice Partida

Kipness. Justices Myers and Garcia participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

.

Judgment entered this 21 st day of July, 2021.
#### Herbert D. Roistacher, Appellant, v New York City Employees’ Retirement System et al., Respondents.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on March 28, 1980, unanimously affirmed on the opinion of Hughes, J., at Special Term, without costs and without disbursements. Concur—Fein, J. P., Markewich, Lupiano and Bloom, JJ.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

NICHOLAS and JENNIFER * 

STRICKLAND, * 

 * 

 Plaintiffs, * 

 * 

v. * Case No. 06-682-TFM 

 * 

CHAMPION ENTERPRISES, INC. * 

 * 

 Defendant. * 

CONFLICT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

 COMES NOW Jennifer Strickland, Plaintiff in the above-captioned matter, and in 

accordance with the order of this Court, making the following disclosure concerning parent 

companies, subsidiaries, partners, limited liability entity members and managers, trustees (but 

not trust beneficiaries), affiliates, or similar entities reportable under the provisions of the Middle 

District of Alabama’s General Order No. 3047: 

 This party is an individual and is not aware of any reportable relationships. 

 /s/ C. Lance Gould _ 

 C. LANCE GOULD (ASB-0913-G66C) 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

OF COUNSEL: 

BEASLEY, ALLEN, CROW, 

METHVIN, PORTIS & MILES, P.C. 

Attorneys at Law 

Post Office Box 4160 

Montgomery, AL 36103-4160 

(334) 269-2343 

(334) 954-7555 (fax) 

Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 49 Filed 07/18/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have electronically filed the original of the foregoing document in 

this Court and served a copy upon all Defendants of record as listed below by placing a copy of 

same in the United States Mail, first class, postage prepaid on this the day of July, 2007. 

 /s/ C. Lance Gould 

 OF COUNSEL 

Gregory S. Ritchey 

RITCHEY & SIMPSON, PLLC 

3288 Morgan Drive, Suite 100 

Birmingham, Alabama 35216 

Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 49 Filed 07/18/2007 Page 2 of 2
59–008 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 109–724 

WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE 

REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 5682, UNITED STATES 

AND INDIA NUCLEAR COOPERATION PROMOTION ACT 

OF 2006 

DECEMBER 7, 2006.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. BISHOP of Utah, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 1101] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 1101, by a nonrecord vote, reports the same to the 

House with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives all points of order against the conference 

report to accompany H.R. 5682, the United States and India Nuclear Cooperation Promotion Act of 2006, and against its consideration. Finally, the rule provides that the conference report shall be 

considered as read. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The waiver of all points of order is necessary because the conference report was filed with the House on Thursday, December 7, 

2006 and it may be considered by the House as early as Friday, 

December 8, 2006, which would violate clause 8 of rule XXII (requiring a three-day layover of conference reports and the accompanying joint explanatory statement). 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with HEARING
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

Wednesday, December 15, 2010, 10 a.m.-12 Noon.

# PLACE: 

Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland.

# STATUS: 

Commission Meeting—Open to the Public

## Matter To Be Considered

*Decisional Matter:*                     Full-Sized and Non-Full-Sized Cribs—Final Rules.                

                    A live webcast of the Meeting can be viewed at                     *http://www.cpsc.gov/​webcast.*                     For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, call (301) 504-7948.                

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

Dated: December 7, 2010.

Todd A. Stevenson,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-31350 Filed 12-9-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
Subpart 2823.2 - Energy and Water Efficiency

and Renewable Energy

Parent topic: PART 2823 - ENVIRONMENT, ENERGY AND WATER EFFICIENCY, RENEWABLE

ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY, AND DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE

2823.204 Procurement exemptions.

The HCA or designee is the agency head for the purposes of executing the written determination not

to purchase ENERGY STAR® or Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP)-designated

products.
#### COEN, Appellant, v. JAMES, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 19, 1914.)

Action by Mary L. Coen against Peter H. James, individually and as trustee, etc.

No opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal denied, on condition that appellant perfect her appeal, place the case on the next calendar, and be ready for argument when reached; otherwise, motion granted, with costs.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Dolores Naples, Respondent, v. Viandvende Corporation et al., Appellants. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent.

Gibson, P. J.

Appeal from a decision awarding death benefits; appellants contending that the evidence upon which decedent’s fatal automobile accident was found to have been employment-connected is incredible as a matter of law. The board was, however, entirely warranted in accepting the proof adduced by claimant, which was fully sufficient to sustain the claim and which stood without factual contradiction; and the record discloses no basis for interference with the board’s undoubted right to determine its credibility. Decedent was the president and active manager of the “ entire operation” of the employer corporation, which was engaged in the business of supplying meat products to restaurants. He was both an inside worker and an outside worker, in the latter capacity seeking customers, soliciting and delivering orders in New York and New Jersey and using for these and other business purposes a car, for the expense of which he was reimbursed by the employer. There was no limitation upon his hours and in dealing with restaurants he was accustomed to traveling at late hours. Decedent was also an officer of, and had a minority stock interest in a restaurant corporation and the uncontradieted evidence is that on the night of his death he had an appointment to meet at 11:30 p.m. the officer thereof who managed the restaurant to arrange for payment or part payment of a bill overdue to the employer corporation; that the manager did not keep the appointment; and that after a second call at the restaurant decedent started for his home and while on the direct route there sustained fatal injuries when his ear struck a highway construction barricade. Attacking the credibility of the proof, appellants question the purpose of the trip by asserting that decedent could himself have paid the bill by merely writing a check; but this assumes that the restaurant corporation had funds to meet such a check and overlooks the proof that company checks had to be signed or countersigned by the officer with whom decedent had an appointment. The other inferences which appellants suggest as rendering claimant’s proof *“*incredible ” have even less support in the evidence if, indeed, *773they can be regarded as inore than argumentative assumptions and conjectures. Decision affirmed, with • one bill of costs • to respondents filing briefs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur in a memorandum decision by (Hibson, P. J.
H. Res. 216

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

May 3, 2005.

Whereas Arthur Miller was considered a legend during the

vaunted period known as Broadway’s Golden Age, earning him a celebrity status that few playwrights would

ever realize;

Whereas, as noted upon his death by The Michigan Daily, the

student newspaper where Arthur Miller honed his writing, Miller was twice denied admission to the University

of Michigan, and gained admittance only after appealing

directly to the Dean;

Whereas in 1949, at the age of 33, with his play ‘‘The Death

of a Salesman’’, Arthur Miller seized all major drama

awards for the year—the Pulitzer Prize, the Tony, and

the New York Drama Critics Award;

Whereas Arthur Miller’s plays, books, essays, and articles

touched the moral fabric of a nation;

Whereas, according to Robert Falls, Artistic Director of Chicago’s Goodman Theatre, ‘‘Probably not a day goes by

that, somewhere in the world, one of Miller’s plays isn’t

being performed.’’;

Whereas during his extraordinary life and career, Arthur Miller tapped a social conscience that will see his work live

as long as there is an American Theatre;
2

•HRES 216 EH

Whereas his courageous response to the McCarthy era witchhunts of the 1950’s was ‘‘The Crucible’’, where his carefully tailored character John Proctor refused to name

names and ultimately died for his convictions;

Whereas Arthur Miller’s success did not come easy and was

born of hard work and an uncanny ability to translate

the human condition on to the American stage; and

Whereas Arthur Miller’s first plays were written at the University of Michigan and earned him two Avery Hopwood

awards which enabled him to complete his education, that

same University now prepares to honor his memory with

the Arthur Miller Theatre: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) recognizes the extraordinary contributions to

American literature and American theatre of Arthur Miller;

(2) honors Arthur Miller as a great American and

pioneer in the annals of American history; and

(3) commends the University of Michigan for its

commitment to build the Arthur Miller Theatre, a fitting

monument to one of its most distinguished alumnus.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gallery of History, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Rod Lynam, Chief Financial Office of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1359, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

1.	 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presented, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/   Rod Lynam
---------------
Rod Lynam
Chief Financial Officer
February 14, 2003
§ 986.95 Proceedings after termination. ( a ) Upon the termination of this part, the Council members serving shall continue as joint trustees for the purpose of liquidating all funds and property then in the possession or under the control of the Council, including claims for any funds unpaid or property not delivered at the time of such termination.
( b ) The joint trustees shall continue in such capacity until discharged by the Secretary; from time to time accounting for all receipts and disbursements; delivering all funds and property on hand, together with all books and records of the Council and of the joint trustees to such person as the Secretary shall direct; and, upon the request of the Secretary, executing such assignments or other instruments necessary and appropriate to vest in such person full title and right to all of the funds, property, or claims vested in the Council or in said joint trustees.
( c ) Any funds collected pursuant to this part and held by such joint trustees or such person over and above the amounts necessary to meet outstanding obligations and the expenses necessarily incurred by the joint trustees or such other person in the performance of their duties under this subpart, as soon as practicable after the termination hereof, shall be returned to the handlers pro rata in proportion to their contributions thereto.
( d ) Any person to whom funds, property, or claims have been transferred or delivered by the Council, upon direction of the Secretary, as provided in this part, shall be subject to the same obligations and duties with respect to said funds, property, or claims as are imposed upon said joint trustees.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA OF

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 3:06-cr-199-MEF

)

ANTHONY SANFORD )

O R D E R

On June 2, 2009, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. #47) in this

case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file

in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is the

ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that:

1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED.

2. The defendant's motions to suppress (Doc. #15) and (Doc. # 30) are DENIED.

DONE this the 23rd day of July, 2009.

/s/ Mark E. Fuller

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cr-00199-MEF-CSC Document 58 Filed 07/23/09 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cr-00196-MHT-CSC Document 21-2 Filed 12/20/2006 Page 1 of 1
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 20

- 00198

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.J.R., A.R. AND A.J.R., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 438th Judicial District Court of Bexar County , Texas

Trial Cause No. 2014CI13956

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, havin g considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant.
We further order this decision certified below for observ ance. September 17, 2020
H. Res. 236

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

April 27, 2005.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 748) to amend title 18, United States Code,

to prevent the transportation of minors in circumvention of

certain laws relating to abortion, and for other purposes. The

first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of

order against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one

hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and

ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary.

After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under

the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary now

printed in the bill. The committee amendment in the nature
2

•HRES 236 EH

of a substitute shall be considered as read. Notwithstanding

clause 11 of rule XVIII, no amendment to the committee

amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be in order except those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules

accompanying this resolution. Each such amendment may be

offered only in the order printed in the report, may be offered

only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the

report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an

opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not

be subject to a demand for division of the question in the

House or in the Committee of the Whole. All points of order

against such amendments are waived. At the conclusion of

consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall

rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments

as may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the

Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the committee

amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amend-
3

•HRES 236 EH

ments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
# ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

April 19, 2024 CR-2023-0375 Markeith Dynard Jefferson v. State of Alabama (Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court: CC-20-2129) 

## NOTICE You are hereby notified that on April 19, 2024, the following action was taken in the above-referenced cause by the Court of Criminal Appeals: Application for Rehearing Overruled.

D. Scott Mitchell, Clerk
§ 993.88 Agents. ( a ) *Authorization by Secretary.* The Secretary may, by a designation in writing, name any person, including any officer or employee of the United States Government, or name any bureau or division in the United States Department of Agriculture, to act as his agent or representative in connection with any of the provisions of this subpart.
( b ) *Authorization by committee.* The committee may authorize any person or persons or agency to act as its agent or representative in connection with the provisions of this subpart.