alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 981.59 Adjustment upon increase of salable percentage. ( a ) Upon any increase in the salable percentage and corresponding decrease in the reserve percentage, the reserve obligation of each handler for the entire crop year to the effective date of such action shall be computed in accordance with such revised salable and reserve percentages. From the reserve almonds that may have been withheld by him and not yet disposed of, any handler authorized to act and acting as agent of the Board in disposing of reserve pursuant to § 981.66 shall be permitted to select, under the supervision and direction of the Board, the particular reserve almonds to be restored to his salable percentage, and such restoration shall be deemed to fulfill the obligation of the Board with respect to such increase.
( b ) In the case of handlers who have not been authorized to dispose of their own reserves, and handlers who have terminated their agencies to dispose of their own reserves, prior to an increase in the salable percentage, insofar as practicable each such handler shall be permitted to select almonds from his own reserve to be restored to his salable quantity. In the event there are not sufficient reserve almonds held by the Board at the time the salable percentage is increased, to make full restoration, as represented by the increase in the salable percentage, to all such handlers, the restoration to the salable quantities of the respective handlers shall be pro rata on the basis of certified kernel weight poundage of reserve contributed by said handlers during the crop year to the date of increase of the salable percentage: *Provided,* That restoration shall be made in a manner that will result, to the extent practicable, in a comparable percentage of reserve disposition for each such handler and that no handler shall receive almonds in excess of his contribution. Such restoration to the salable quantity shall be deemed to fulfill the obligation of the Board with respect to the increase in the salable percentage.
[35 FR 11372, July 16, 1970, as amended at 89 FR 37968, May 7, 2024]
Case 3:06-cv-00740-MHT-SRW Document 14 Filed 10/06/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### Yaakov Kanovsky, Appellant, v Montefiore Medical Center et al., Respondents.

Submitted December 3, 2007;

decided January 10, 2008

Reported below, 40 AD3d 938.

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied [see 9 NY3d 940 (2007)].
§ 15.38 Use of credit reports. The NRC may institute a credit investigation of the debtor at any time following receipt of knowledge of the debt in order to aid NRC in making appropriate determinations as to: ( a ) The collection and compromise of a debt;
( b ) The collection of interest, penalties, and administrative costs;
( c ) The use of administrative offset;
( d ) The use of other collection methods; and
( e ) The likelihood of collecting the debt.
[55 FR 32380, Aug. 9, 1990]
Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 21 Filed 11/16/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 21 Filed 11/16/2006 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 21-2 Filed 11/16/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 21-3 Filed 11/16/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 21-3 Filed 11/16/2006 Page 2 of 2
Subpart 319.2 - Policies

Parent topic: PART 319 - SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS

319.201 General policy.

(d) The functional management responsibilities for the Department of Health and Human Services'

(HHS) small business program are delegated to the Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business

Utilization (OSDBU) Director.

(e)

(1) The HHS OSDBU Director shall exercise full management authority over the small business

program. The small business specialist (SBS) shall review and make recommendations for all

acquisitions, unless exempted by statute, that are not being set aside for small business in

accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 19.502. The review must take place prior to

issuing the solicitation.

(2) Within the Indian Health Service (IHS), the primary SBSs are responsible for IHS' overall

implementation of the HHS small business program; however, each IHS contracting office will

assign a small business technical advisor (SBTA) to perform those functions and responsibilities

necessary to implement the small business program. The primary IHS SBS shall assist and provide

guidance to respective SBTAs.

319.270-1 Mentor Protégé Program Solicitation provision

and contract clause.

(a) The contacting officer shall insert the provision at 352.219-70, Mentor-Protégé Program, in

solicitations that include the clause at FAR 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan. The

provision requires offerors to provide the contracting officer a copy of their HHS Office of OSDBUapproved mentor-protégé agreement in response to a solicitation.

(b) The contacting officer shall insert the clause at 352.219-71, Mentor-Protégé Program Reporting

Requirements, in contracts that include the clause at FAR 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting

Plan, and which are awarded to a contractor with an HHS OSDBU-approved mentor-protégé

agreement.
§ 1049.5 Exercise of arrest authority—General guidelines. ( a ) In making an arrest, and before taking a person into custody, the Protective Force Officer should: ( 1 ) Announce the Protective Force Officer's authority (*e.g.,* by identifying himself as an SPR Protective Force Officer);
( 2 ) State that the suspect is under arrest; and
( 3 ) Inform the suspect of the crime for which the suspect is being arrested. If the circumstances are such that making these announcements would be useless or dangerous to the Officer or to another person, the Protective Force Officer may dispense with these announcements.
( b ) At the time and place of arrest, the Protective Force Officer may search the person arrested for weapons and criminal evidence, and may search the area into which the person arrested might reach to obtain a weapon to destroy evidence.
( c ) After the arrest is effected, the person arrested shall be advised of his constitutional right against self-incrimination (“*Miranda* warnings”). If the circumstances are such that immediately advising the person arrested of this right would result in imminent danger to the Officer or other persons, the Protective Force Officer may postpone this requirement. The person arrested shall be advised of this right as soon as practicable after the imminent danger has passed.
( d ) As soon as practicable after the arrest is effected, custody of the person arrested should be transferred to other Federal law enforcement personnel (*e.g.,* U.S. Marshals or FBI agents) or to local law enforcement personnel, as appropriate, in order to ensure that the person is brought before a magistrate without unnecessary delay.
( e ) Ordinarily, the person arrested shall not be questioned or required to sign written statements unless such questioning is: ( 1 ) Necessary to establish the identity of the person arrested and the purpose for which such person is within or upon the SPR;
( 2 ) Necessary to avert an immediate threat to security or safety (*e.g.,* to locate a bomb); or
( 3 ) Authorized by other Federal law enforcement personnel or local law enforcement personnel responsible for investigating the alleged crime.
Note Regarding this
Exhibit:  This document provides a written description of an oral
contract entered into between OneUp Innovations, Inc. and
Louis S. Friedman on January 1, 2005.

    


    Parties:

    


    Louis S.
Friedman (“Lender”)

    CEO

    OneUp
Innovations, Inc.

    2745
Bankers Industrial Drive

    Atlanta,
GA 30360

    


    OneUp
Innovations, Inc. (the “Company”)

    2745
Bankers Industrial Drive

    Atlanta,
GA 30360

    


    Date:

    


    January
1, 2005

    


    Material
Terms:

    


    This oral
contract was for a subordinated note payable.  The Lender agreed to
provide the Company with loans from time to time to supplement the working
capital of the Company. These loans are unsecured and are subordinated to any
and all other loans that the Company may have.

    


    Interest
on the loans accrue at the Prime Lending rate. The loans have no specific
maturity and are payable upon demand, if the Company has the ability (and the
right) to repay them.
5122.1704 Violations and remedies.

(c) The Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology) shall ensure that the

contracting officer is provided with the report as described in FAR 22.1704(c). See Appendix GG for

further delegation.

Parent topic: Subpart 5122.17 - Combating Trafficking in Persons
1502.100 Definitions.

Chief of the Contracting Office (CCO) means the Office of Acquisition Management Division

Directors at Headquarters, Research Triangle Park and Cincinnati. For purposes of ratification

authority only, CCO also includes Regional Acquisition Managers. (See 1501.602-3(b)(3) for the

criteria for this ratification authority).

Commercial supplier agreements (CSAs) mean terms and conditions customarily offered to the

public by vendors of supplies or services that meet the definition of “commercial item” set forth in

FAR 2.101 and intended to create a binding legal obligation on the end user. CSAs are common in

information technology acquisitions, including acquisitions of commercial computer software and

commercial technical data, and they may apply to any supply or service. CSAs may apply regardless

of the format or style of the document (for example, a CSA may be styled as standard terms of sale

or lease, Terms of Service (TOS), End User License Agreement (EULA), or another similar legal

instrument or agreement, and may be presented as part of a proposal or quotation responding to a

solicitation for a contract or order). CSAs may also apply regardless of the media or delivery

mechanism used (for example, a CSA may be presented as one or more paper documents, or may

appear on a computer or other electronic device screen during a purchase, software installation,

product delivery, registration for a service, or other transaction).

Head of the Contracting Activity (HCA) means the Director, Office of Acquisition Management.

Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) means the Director, Office of Acquisition Management.

Parent topic: Subpart 1502.1 - Definitions
#### In the Matter of Zander Dixon, Petitioner, v Robert M. Morgenthau et al., Respondents.

Application for a writ of prohibition unanimously granted and the indictment dismissed, on consent, without costs and without disbursements, as indicated in the order of this court. No opinion. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Birns, Markewich and Silverman, JJ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

M IDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABA M A

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

November 20, 2006

NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE

To: ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD

Case Style: Price v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al

Case Number: 2:06cv00721-MHT

Referenced Pleading: INTERROGATORIES & REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION

Docket Entry Number: 15 & 16

The referenced pleadings were electronically filed on ***November 20, 2006*** in this case

and is not in compliance with the local rules and/or administrative procedures of this court.

******These pleadings are discovery and are not allowed pursuant to Local Rule 5.1 NONFILING OF CIVIL DISCOVERY.

The pleadings are hereby STRICKEN from the record and the parties are instructed to

disregard the entry of these pleadings on the court’s docket. Parties should be aware that the

striking of these entries does not affect their responsibilities as to the discovery process.

Case 2:06-cv-00721-MHT-TFM Document 17 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 1 of 1
1542.1203 Processing agreements.

(a) The responsible contracting office shall:

(1) Obtain from the Contractor a list of all affected contracts, the names and addresses of the

contracting offices responsible for these contracts, and the required documentary evidence.

(2) Verify the accuracy of the list of contracts through the Contract Information System.

(3) Draft and execute a supplemental agreement to one of the contracts affected but covering all

applicable outstanding and incomplete contracts affected by the transfer of assets or change of

name. A supplemental agreement number need not be obtained for contracts other than for the one

under which the supplemental agreement is written. The supplemental agreement will contain a list

of the contracts affected and, for distribution purposes, the names and addresses of the contracting

offices having contracts subject to the supplemental agreement.

(b) Agreements and supporting documents covering successors in interest shall be reviewed for

legal sufficiency by legal counsel.

(c) After execution of the supplemental agreement, the designated office shall forward an

authenticated copy of the supplemental agreement to the Director, Policy, Training and Oversight

Division, and to each affected contract office.

Parent topic: Subpart 1542.12 - Novation and Change of Name Agreements
#### § 996.19 Shelled peanuts.

*Shelled peanuts* means the kernels or portions of kernels of peanuts in their raw or natural state after the shells are removed.

[81 FR 50288, Aug. 1, 2016]
#### In the Matter of Woodrow Flemming, Appellant, v Charles Tejada, as Justice of the Supreme Court, New York County, et al., Respondents.

Submitted November 5, 2007;

decided December 20, 2007

Reported below, 43 AD3d 809.

On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. Motion for leave to appeal etc. denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

RICHARD MARSHALL, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 2:06-CV-701-ID

)

CHRIS WEST, in his individual )

capacity, and LASHUN HUTSON, ) 

in his individual capacity, )

)

Defendants. )

O R D E R

Upon CONSIDERATION of Carol Gerard’s Motion to Withdraw as co-counsel for

Plaintiff (Doc. No. 24, filed October 2, 2007), and for good cause shown, it is ORDERED

that said Motion be and the same is hereby GRANTED.

DONE this 3 day of October, 2007. rd

/s/ Ira DeMent 

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00701-ID-CSC Document 25 Filed 10/03/2007 Page 1 of 1
From: Riley, Marianne (MJ)

Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 10:37 AM
To: Alexander, Lillian (DEQ)
Subject: ADCOTE 76R36B/9L7 Diisocyanate Information (1

- 9QMS07)
Attachments: ADCOTE(TM) 76R36B MSDS

- US.PDF; COREACTANT 9L7 MSDS

- US.PDF; ADCOTETM 76R36B, rev 2012, CPDS.pdf; COREACTANT 9L7, rev 2012, CPDS.PDF

Subject: ADCOTETM 76R36B/COREACTANT 9L7 Adhesive System

Dear Ms. Alexander,
In response to your question of September 18 2012, copied and pasted here:

Thank you for sending the CPDS for Coreactant 9L7. My interest is not how much Hexamethylene Diisocyanate (H

- D) is in Coreactant 9L7, but how much is emitted to the atmosphere. It is my understanding that the purpose of the H

- D in the coreactant is to facil itate a reaction and that all of the H

- D would not be expected to be emitted to the atmosphere. How much of the H

- D will react or bond in the process and will not be emitted to the atmosphere?
As stated in the MSDS and CPDS (attached), ADCOTETM 76R36B does not contain isocyanates, while COREACTANT 9L7 contains approximately 0.5% Hexamethylene Diisocyanate (HMDI), as supplied in the original unopened container. At the recommended mix ratio of 100 parts ADCOTE 76R36B to 4 parts COREACTANT 9L7, the theoretical HMDI concentration in the wet adhesive blend is estimated to be approximately 0.0192% by weight, or 192 ppm.
The diisocyanate is consumed (reacts with the polyester polymer) during the drying and curing process. The finished laminate struct ure is not expected to contain any residual diisocyanate. Our customers are expected to use our Adhesive Systems in an industrial setting according to the guidelines stated in the Material Safety Data Sheet, including proper ventilation and environmenta l controls.
Our information is based upon the theoretical compositions. We are disclosing this information, to the best of our knowledge, based upon data from our raw material suppliers and knowledge of our manufacturing processes. We believe our information to be accurate and reliable as of this date.

Best Regards,

Marianne

Marianne Rile yProduct Specialist

– Performance Plastics

Customer Information Group

Dow Business Services LLC, Market & Sales Solutions

2007 Austin, Midland, MI 48674

E

- mail: mjcikaloriley@dow.com
This information is considered accurate and reliable as of the date appearing above and is presented in good faith. Because use conditions and applicable laws may differ from one location to another and may change with time, recipient is responsible for determining whether the information in this document is appropriate for recipient's use. Since Dow has no control over how this information may ultimate ly be used, all liability is expressly disclaimed and Dow assumes no obligation or liability therefore. No warranty, expressed or implied, is given nor is freedom from any patent owned by The Dow Chemical Company or others to be inferred.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 6354** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. TERRIAL HARRIS, a/k/a Terry , Defendant

– Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. ( 3:07

- cr - 00419

- RLW

- 1; 3:09

- cv - 00289

- RLW )

Submitted : August 19, 2010 Decided: August 30, 2010

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by u n published per curiam opinion
. Terrial Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Sinclair Duffey, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Terrial Harris seeks to appeal the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2010 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certifica te of appealability will not issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reason able jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed t he record and conclude that Harris has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate rials3 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
653.219-71 DOS form DS–4053, Department

of State Mentor-Protégé Program

Application.

As prescribed in 619.102–70(i), DS–4053 is prescribed for use in applying for an agreement under

the Department of State Mentor-Protégé Program.

Parent topic: Subpart 653.2—Prescription of Forms
Exhibit 31.2 

 

**Citizens Financial Corp.**

**Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Thomas K. Derbyshire, Vice President, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of Citizens Financial Corp., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Citizens Financial Corp; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results in operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 13, 2003
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 25 Filed 02/06/2007 Page 1 of 16
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 25 Filed 02/06/2007 Page 2 of 16
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 25 Filed 02/06/2007 Page 3 of 16
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 25 Filed 02/06/2007 Page 4 of 16
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 25 Filed 02/06/2007 Page 5 of 16
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 25 Filed 02/06/2007 Page 6 of 16
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 25 Filed 02/06/2007 Page 7 of 16
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 25 Filed 02/06/2007 Page 8 of 16
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 25 Filed 02/06/2007 Page 9 of 16
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 25 Filed 02/06/2007 Page 10 of 16
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 25 Filed 02/06/2007 Page 11 of 16
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 25 Filed 02/06/2007 Page 12 of 16
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 25 Filed 02/06/2007 Page 13 of 16
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 25 Filed 02/06/2007 Page 14 of 16
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 25 Filed 02/06/2007 Page 15 of 16
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 25 Filed 02/06/2007 Page 16 of 16