alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### 211 West 56th Street Associates, Appellant, v Department of Housing Preservation and Development of the City of New York et al., Respondents.

—Order and judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered June 29, 1979, granting cross motion of respondents to dismiss the petition as a matter of law, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the cross motion denied, and the matter remanded. This proceeding was instituted to review respondents’ determination, denying in part, petitioner’s application for a certificate of eligibility for partial tax exemption under section 421-a of the Real Property Tax Law. The property for which the tax exemption was sought is *794a 35-story mixed-use building for which construction was completed in 1977. The petition alleged four causes of action. After it was filed, respondents moved pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 7) and CPLR 7804 (subd [f]) to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action. Without notice to the parties Special Term converted the cross motion into one for summary judgment, and dismissed the petition, although the dismissal of the fourth cause of action was without prejudice to any subsequent application by petitioners for a recalculation of the tax exemption upon a showing of arithmetical error. If a motion to dismiss is made pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a]) or 3211 (subd [b]), notice of the court’s intention to convert the motion into one for summary judgment must be given to the parties. (CPLR 3211, subd [c].) On a motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action (CPLR 3211, subd [a], par 7) only the allegations of the petition may be considered *(Rovello v Orofino Realty Co.,*40 NY2d 633, 636), and “affidavits may be received for a limited purpose only, serving normally to remedy defects in the complaint”. The opinion of Special Term indicates that additional documents submitted by respondents were considered, including a declaration drafted five months after the occurrence of the subject of the petition — the partial denial of the tax abatement. Thus, the matter must be remanded, and, if the court wishes to consider the motion as one for summary judgment , it must afford petitioners the opportunity to submit further supporting evidence. Concur — Birns, J. P., Sullivan, Markewich, Silverman and Yesawich, JJ.
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 19

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the President 

should award the Presidential Medal of Freedom posthumously to Rick 

Husband, William McCool, Michael Anderson, Kalpana Chawla, David 

Brown, Laurel Clark, and Ilan Ramon, all of whom died in the destruction of the space shuttle Columbia. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2005

Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

the President should award the Presidential Medal of 

Freedom posthumously to Rick Husband, William 

McCool, Michael Anderson, Kalpana Chawla, David 

Brown, Laurel Clark, and Ilan Ramon, all of whom 

died in the destruction of the space shuttle Columbia.

Whereas Rick Husband, William McCool, Michael Anderson, 

Kalpana Chawla, David Brown, Laurel Clark, and Ilan 

Ramon volunteered for and were chosen to be the crew 

for mission STS–107 on space shuttle Columbia; 

Whereas it is a brave and heroic act to volunteer and be selected for such a mission; 
2

HRES 19 IH 

Whereas the Columbia experienced a failure and was destroyed over the States of Texas and Louisiana as it approached to land on February 1, 2003; 

Whereas the crew members on Columbia risked their lives in 

space exploration for the betterment of mankind; and 

Whereas the selfless dedication and courage demonstrated by 

these astronauts should be honored in the highest manner: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the President should award the Presi3 dential Medal of Freedom posthumously to Rick Husband, 

4 William McCool, Michael Anderson, Kalpana Chawla, 

5 David Brown, Laurel Clark, and Ilan Ramon, all of whom 

6 died in the explosion of the space shuttle Columbia.

Æ
§ 110.131 Petition for rulemaking. ( a ) A petition for rulemaking should be addressed to the Secretary of the Commission, for the attention of the Secretary's Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff. The petition should be sent using an appropriate method listed in § 110.4.
( b ) The petition shall state the basis for the requested amendment.
( c ) The petition may request the Commission to suspend all or part of any licensing proceeding under this part pending disposition of the petition.
( d ) The Secretary will assign a docket number to the petition, place a copy in the Public Document Room and notice its receipt in the Federal Register.
( e ) Publication may be limited by order of the Commission to the extent required by section 181 of the Atomic Energy Act.
[43 FR 21641, May 19, 1978, as amended at 63 FR 15744, Apr. 1, 1998; 68 FR 58824, Oct. 10, 2003]
#### § 110.65 Settlement and compromise.

At any time after issuance of an order for any enforcement action under this subpart, an agreement may be entered into for settlement of the proceeding or compromise of a penalty. Upon approval by the Commission, or presiding officer if a hearing has been requested, the terms of the settlement or compromise will be embodied in the order disposing of the enforcement action.
§ 1704.1 Applicability. ( a ) This part implements the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b). These procedures apply to meetings, as defined herein, of the Members of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (Board). The Board may waive the provisions set forth in this part to the extent authorized by law.
( b ) Requests for all documents other than the transcripts, recordings, and minutes described in § 1704.8 shall be governed by Board regulations pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552).
Subpart 1539.1 - Commercial Supplier

Agreements

Parent topic: PART 1539 - ACQUISITION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
## • Heat content (enthalpies) should all be based on steam tables (steam and condensate)

• Should include heat of make- up water as additional heat into boiler

• Not clear if steam data is gross or net output, or mix – could explain very high efficiency values in data

• Base calculation on most reliable and most available dataBoiler Steam Out 858 F 11 85 Psig 1427 Btu/lb 769,000 lb/hr 1097 MMBtu Heat in 1067 MMBtu Steam to process 858 F 11 85 Psig 1427 Btu/lb 677,000 lb/hr 966.1 MMBtu Pegging steam 92,000 lb/hr 130.9 MMBtu 1 1 2 3

4

DA Feedwater 280 F 249.3 Btu/lb 769,000 lb/hr 191.7 MMBtu Return Condensate 143 F 111 Btu/lb 521,300 lb/hr (77%) 57.8 MMBtu Make up 60 F 28 Btu/lb 155,700 lb/hr 4.4 MMBtu 5

6 7
AZCatalystPaperSnowflakeEf

ficiency 1 = (2 - 7)/1 = (1097 - 191.7)/1067 = 84.8% Ef ficiency 2 = (3 - 5-6)/1 = (966.1 -57.8-4.4)/1067 = 84.7%

Ef ficiency 3 = (2 -5)/1 = (1097 -57.8)/1067 = 97.3%
#### Shuttleworth Artists, Ltd., Respondent, v Karla Hurwitz et al., Appellants.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on July 5, 1979, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The stay presently in effect is continued for a period of 60 days after service of a copy of this court’s order with notice of entry thereof. No opinion. Concur— Kupferman, J. P., Fein, Lupiano, Bloom and Carro, JJ.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CRIMINAL ACTION NO.

) 2:06cr209-MHT

BRIDGET Y. TAYLOR )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that defendant Bridget Y. Taylor’s

motion for reconsideration (doc. no. 40) is denied.

DONE, this the 8th day of February, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00209-MHT-CSC Document 41 Filed 02/08/2007 Page 1 of 1
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CR. NO. 1:06cr197-MEF

)

RODERICK CHARLES MELVIN )

UNITED STATES’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL

 Comes now the United States of America, by and through Leura G. Canary, United States

Attorney for the Middle of Alabama, and requests a continuance of the trial of Roderick Charles

Melvin, and as grounds states the following:

1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate filed on November 14, 2006, (Doc. 18) is

presently pending before this Honorable Court. 

2. On this date, November 20, 2006, the United States has requested an extension of time

in order to acquire a transcript of the evidentiary hearing before filing an objection to the

Recommendation. (Doc.19-1). The transcript has been requested. 

3. The United States has contacted defense counsel Kevin L. Butler regarding the motion

to continue the trial. Counsel Butler verbally informed the undersigned counsel that he must file

a motion to withdraw as counsel for Roderick Charles Melvin because of a conflict. A panel

counsel will have to be appointed to represent Defendant Melvin. 

4. The trial of this case is presently scheduled to commence on November 27, 2006. The

panel attorney is not likely to be appointed before Wednesday, November 22, 2006, and will

unlikely be prepared to proceed to trial on November 27, 2006.

5. Therefore, the United States requests a continuance of this trial to allow the extension

of time in which the government must file its objection of the Recommendation of the Magistrate

Case 1:06-cr-00197-MEF-CSC Document 20 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 1 of 3
2

Judge. In addition, based upon the newly discovered conflict of Kevin L. Butler’s representation

and the need to appoint another counsel to represent Defendant Melvin, it would be in the

interest of justice to continue the trial of this case. Moreover, the defendant will not be

prejudiced by a continuance of this case.

Respectfully submitted on this 20 day of November 2006. th

LEURA G. CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/Tommie Brown Hardwick

TOMMIE BROWN HARDWICK

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334) 223-7280

Fax: (334) 223-7135

E-mail: tommie.hardwick@usdoj.gov

ASB4152 W86T

Case 1:06-cr-00197-MEF-CSC Document 20 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 2 of 3
3

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CR. NO. 1:06cr197-MEF

)

RODERICK CHARLES MELVIN )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on November 20, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with the

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the

following: Kevin L. Butler, Esq.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/Tommie Brown Hardwick

TOMMIE BROWN HARDWICK

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334)223-7280

Fax: (334)223-7135

E-mail: tommie.hardwick@usdoj.gov

ASB4152 W86T

Case 1:06-cr-00197-MEF-CSC Document 20 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 3 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

 v. )

)

OSCAR MARTINEZ -RAMIREZ ) CR. NO. 1:06cr201-WHA

O R D E R

The defendant has been found guilty of a criminal offense in accordance with the

Constitution and laws of the United States. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. That sentencing of the defendant be, and the same is, hereby set on May 31, 2007, at

10:00 a.m. in the Frank M. Johnson, Jr. United States Courthouse Complex, One Church Street,

Montgomery, Alabama.

2. That in accordance with Rule 32(f)(1), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, on or

before April 30, 2007, the defendant and the Government shall communicate in writing to the

probation officer, and to each other, any objections they have as to any material information,

sentencing classifications, sentencing guideline ranges, and policy statements contained in or

omitted from the presentence report.

3. That, unless excused in writing by the Chief U.S. Probation Officer of this district,

counsel for the parties shall be available for a conference with the probation officer on May 3, 2007,

at 10:00 a.m., to discuss and resolve, if possible, factual and legal issues contained in the

presentence report. If the probation officer determines or if any of the parties request that a personal

meeting be held to resolve the issues, such meeting shall be at the U.S. Probation Office, One

Church Street, Montgomery, AL, on the above date and time. Such request for a personal

conference shall be made to the probation officer within five (5) calendar days after receipt of the

presentence report. Otherwise, the conference shall be held telephonically. Any motion for

downward departure shall be filed on or before the conference date with the probation officer, unless

based on unknown and unforseen circumstances arising after that date, in which case the motion

must be filed promptly upon discovery of such circumstances. 

Nothing contained in this Order shall be construed as impairing the rights of any party as

established in the Constitution or laws of the United States.

DONE this 14th day of March , 2006.

 /s/ W. Harold Albritton 

Senior United States District Judge

Case 1:06-cr-00201-WHA-CSC Document 52 Filed 03/14/2007 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Kindred Biosciences, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:


(i)    The annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(ii)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  March 14, 2014By:/s/ Richard ChinName:   Richard Chin, MDTitle:   Chief Executive Officer
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 3:06-cr-210-MEF 

)

MELISSA WARD ) 

RESPONSE TO MOTION TO CONTINUE

OR RESCHEDULE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

COMES NOW the United States of America, by and through Leura Garrett Canary, United

States Attorney for the Middle District of Alabama, and files its response to the Defendant’s Motion

to Continue or Reschedule Pretrial Conference, filed on or about October 26, 2006, as follows:

The Government has no objection to the Defendant’s motion to reschedule the pretrial

continuance and can be available for any of the Defendant’s proposed hearing dates. 

Respectfully submitted this the 26 day of October, 2006. th

LEURA GARRETT CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/ Christopher A. Snyder

CHRISTOPHER A. SNYDER

Assistant United States Attorney

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Telephone: (334) 223-7280

Fax: (334) 223-7135

E-mail: christopher.a.snyder@usdoj.gov

Case 3:06-cr-00210-MEF-CSC Document 12 Filed 10/26/2006 Page 1 of 2
-2-

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 3:06-cr-210-MEF 

)

MELISSA WARD ) 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on October 26, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk

of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following:

Charles Vercelli.

Respectfully submitted,

 LEURA GARRETT CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/ Christopher A. Snyder

CHRISTOPHER A. SNYDER

Assistant United States Attorney

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Telephone: (334) 223-7280

Fax: (334) 223-7135

E-mail: christopher.a.snyder@usdoj.gov

Case 3:06-cr-00210-MEF-CSC Document 12 Filed 10/26/2006 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 196 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 196

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      December 7, 2005.
Whereas on December 6, 1865, the 13th Amendment to the Constitution was 
        ratified, proclaiming that ``neither slavery nor involuntary servitude . 
        . . shall exist within the United States'';
Whereas the ratification of the 13th Amendment began a civil rights movement 
        which would radically change African American existence in the United 
        States;
Whereas the 13th Amendment represented a victory for African Americans across 
        the United States, who had been denied the rights of full citizens;
Whereas the 13th Amendment is a symbol of the Federal Government's commitment to 
        fulfill its promise of equality, liberty, and the American dream for all 
        Americans because it liberated African Americans from the yoke of 
        slavery and launched a new age activism advocating equal rights for all 
        minorities;
Whereas December 6, 2005, marks the 140th anniversary of the ratification of the 
        13th Amendment;
Whereas the observation of the 140th anniversary would put into effect section 2 
        of the Amendment, by reaffirming Congress' ``power to enforce this 
        article by appropriate legislation''; and
Whereas the 13th Amendment Foundation supports the establishment of a national 
        day of recognition commemorating the anniversary of the ratification of 
        the 13th Amendment to renew a national commitment to eradicate racial 
        and ethnic inequalities: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the 140th anniversary of the ratification of the 13th 
        Amendment to the Constitution;
            (2) encourages the American people to educate and instill pride and 
        purpose into their communities about the history of liberation and the 
        civil rights movement in the United States; and
            (3) encourages the American people to observe the anniversary of the 
        ratification of the 13th Amendment each year by honoring its 
        significance in United States history with appropriate programs and 
        activities.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
1019.811-3 Contract clauses.

(d)(3) Insert the clause at 1052.219-18, Notification of Competition Limited to Eligible 8(a) Concerns

- Alternate III (Deviation), for paragraph (c) of FAR 52.219-18, Notification of Competition Limited to

Eligible 8(a) Concerns, in all solicitations and contracts that exceed $100,000 and are processed

under FAR 19.8.

(f) Insert the clause at 1052.219-72, Section 8(a) Direct Awards, in solicitations and contracts that

exceed $100,000 and are processed under FAR 19.8 for paragraph (c) of FAR 52.219-11, Special 8(a)

Contract Conditions; FAR 52.219-12, Special 8(a) Subcontract Conditions; and FAR 52.219-17,

Section 8(a) Award.

Parent topic: Subpart 1019.8 - Contracting With the Small Business Administration (The 8(a)

Program)
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO

  | Commercial Mortgage Servicing

D1086-120, 12th Floor

550 South Tryon Street

Charlotte, NC 28202

1-800-326-1334

  |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2012, by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, Torchlight Loan Services, LLC, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor, with respect  to  Commercial  Mortgage  Pass-Through  Certificates  Series  2012-CCRE4  (the "Agreement").  Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.11 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of

Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.         A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1,

2014 through December 31, 2014 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2.         To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

 

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 6th day of

March 2015.

 

 

 

 /s/ Daniel Bober 

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

 

 
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
Subpart 2831.1 - Applicability

Parent topic: PART 2831 - CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES

2831.101 Objectives.

(a) The SPE is the official authorized to grant individual deviations from the cost principles of FAR

part 31.

(b) Requests for class deviations from the cost principles set forth in FAR part 31 will be forwarded

through the SPE prior to submission to the CAAC.

2831.109 Advance agreements.

(a) DOJ and bureau contracting officers are encouraged to negotiate advance agreements

concerning the treatment of special or unusual costs to avoid possible subsequent disputes or

disallowance of costs based upon unreasonableness or nonallowability. All such agreements shall be

negotiated in accordance with FAR 31.109, prior to the contractor incurring such costs.

(b) All determinations required by this subpart shall be reviewed and approved at a level above the

contracting officer prior to negotiation of the proposed agreement. The approved determination

shall be placed in the contract file.

(c) Advance agreements will be signed by both the contractor and the contracting officer, and made

a part of the contract file. Copies of executed advance agreements will be distributed to the

cognizant audit office, when applicable.