alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT
               TO RULE 13a-14(b)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gallery of History, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Todd Axelrod, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

1.	 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Todd Axelrod
Todd Axelrod
Chief Executive Officer

May 15, 2009
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3229 

To clarify the classification of certain high-density fiberboard and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. LOTT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To clarify the classification of certain high-density fiberboard 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HIGH DENSITY FIBERBOARD. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 44 of the Harmonized 

5 Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by insert6 ing in numerical sequence the following new subheading 

7 with the article description for subheading 4411.19.35 

8 having the same degree of indentation as the article de9 scription for subheading 4411.19.30: 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•S 3229 IS 

‘‘ 4411.19.35 Laminate boards, bonded in whole or 

in part, or impregnated with synthetic resins of a density exceeding 

0.8g/cm. ............................................. 1.9¢/kg + 

1.5% 

Free (A, AU, 

CA, CL, E, IL, 

J, JO, MA, 

MX, SG) 

33¢/kg + 25% 

’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

V. ) CR. No.: 2:06cr206-MHT

)

ALETHIA ADRIANNE SCOTT )

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PRETRIAL MOTIONS

COMES NOW the Defendant, Alethia Adrianne Scotty, by and through undersigned counsel,

Kevin L. Butler, and requests an extension of time of one day to file pretrial motions. In support of

this motion undersigned counsel states: 

1. Pursuant to court order, Ms. Scott was to file pretrial motions on or before September 21,

2006.

2. Ms. Scott is charged with fraud and the discovery provided to defense includes

approximately 300 documents. Undersigned counsel needs an additional day to review

discovery and file any necessary pretrial motions.

3. It is in the interest of justice to allow undersigned counsel until September 22, 2006, to

prepare and file any necessary pretrial motions in this matter.

WHEREFORE, the defendant prays that he be allowed until Friday, September 22, 2006

to file any pretrial motion in this matter.

 Dated this 21 day of September 2006. st

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Kevin L. Butler

KEVIN L. BUTLER

First Assistant Federal Defender

201 Monroe Street, Suite 407

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Phone: (334) 834-2099; Fax: (334) 834-0353

E-mail: kevin_butler@fd.org

AZ Bar Code: 014138

Case 2:06-cr-00206-MHT-CSC Document 30 Filed 09/21/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

V. ) CR. No.: 2:06cr206-MHT

)

ALETHIA ADRIANNE SCOTT )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on September 21, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk

of Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following: 

Chris Snyder, Esquire

Assistant United States Attorney

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Kevin L. Butler

KEVIN L. BUTLER

First Assistant Federal Defender

201 Monroe Street, Suite 407

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Phone: (334) 834-2099

Fax: (334) 834-0353

E-mail: kevin_butler@fd.org

AZ Bar Code: 014138

Case 2:06-cr-00206-MHT-CSC Document 30 Filed 09/21/2006 Page 2 of 2
*The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d) (2000). UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6664
DAVID AMBERGER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections; JOHN JABE, Deputy Director of Operations Virginia Department of Corrections; LARRY HUFFMAN, Regional Director of Virginia Department of Corrections; LARRY W. JARVIS, Warden of Bland Correctional Center; VIRGINIA BANDY, Institutional Operations Administrator of Bland Correctional Center; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER DOE, Bland Correctional Center; JANE DOE, Correctional Officer Bland Correctional Center, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:06-cv-00162-jlk) Submitted: October 31, 2006 Decided: November 3, 2006 Before WILLIAMS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. * Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.- 2 - David Amberger, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 3 - PER CURIAM: David Amberger appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Amberger’s motion to file supplemental pleadings and documents, deny Amberger’s motion for the appointment of counsel, deny his motion for a temporary restraining order, and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Amberger v. Johnson , No. 7:06-cv-00162-jlk (W.D. Va. Apr. 3, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
COURTROOM DEPUTY MINUTES DATE : OCTOBER 13, 2006

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA DIGITAL RECORDED: 1:09 p. m. to 1:11 p.m.

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE 

PRESIDING MAG. JUDGE: CHARLES S. COODY DEPUTY CLERK: WANDA STINSON 

CASE NUMBER: 1:06CR197-MEF-CSC DEFENDANT NAME: RODERICK C. MELVIN

 

APPEARANCES

GOVERNMENT DEFENDANT

ATTY. TOMMIE HARDWICK ATTY. KEVIN BUTLER

/ DISCOVERY STATUS: Complete.

_________________________________________________________________________________________

 _________________________________________________________________________________________

/ PENDING MOTION STATUS: Deft’s Motion to Suppress. 

 PLEA STATUS:

__________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________

/ TRIAL STATUS: Will take 1 day to try case if goes to trial.

_________________________________________________________________________________________

/ REMARKS: Will set Suppression hrg. near the end of the month.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

Case 1:06-cr-00197-MEF-CSC Document 14 Filed 10/13/2006 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 33 (Friday, February 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 7542]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3170]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Tax Forms and 
Publications/MLI Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Tax Forms and 
Publications/MLI Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer 
Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, March 11, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marisa Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or 
718-488-3557

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Tax Forms and 
Publications/MLI Project Committee will be held Thursday, March 11, 
2010, at 1 p.m. Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is 
invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for 
consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent 
to participate must be made with Marisa Knispel. For more information, 
please contact Ms. Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3557, or write 
TAP Office, 10 MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, 
or post comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.
    Reason for Late Notice: Due to inclement weather and federal office 
closings in the District of Columbia, key TAP staff was unavailable to 
prepare and submit notice in time to meet the 15-day notice 
requirement. Scheduling conflicts with other meetings prevent 
rescheduling this meeting.

    Dated: February 12, 2010.
Linda Rivera,
Senior Program Analyst, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2010-3170 Filed 2-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 70 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                            2521
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      152
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2800
<PP&E>                                           63278
<DEPRECIATION>                                   22759
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   43319
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1241
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       42078
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     43319
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  7890
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2433
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  2258
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   3199
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               3199
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      3199
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    11.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    11.44
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

DELOISE PRICE, | 

 | 

 PLAINTIFF | 

 | 

VS. | CASE NO. 2:06-CV-721 

 | 

WAL-MART STORES, INC., | 

et al., | 

 | 

 DEFENDANTS | 

DEFENDANTS’ EXHIBIT LIST

 Come now the Defendants and submit the following list of exhibits which 

may be used at trial: 

1. Price deposition comparison; 

2. Dr. Tai Chung report; 

3. Dr. Tai Chung CV; 

4. Owner’s Manual; 

5. Medical Records from Pine Apple Health Center; 

6. Price vs. Bill’s Dollar Store docket sheet; 

7. Photographs of machine; 

8. Photographs of scene of accident; 

9. Videos taken at scene of accident; 

10. Cancelled check; 

Case 2:06-cv-00721-MHT-TFM Document 31 Filed 10/17/2007 Page 1 of 3
2

11. Pri-Med records; 

12. Baptist x-rays; 

13. Dr. Mattox’s records; 

14. Neurosurgery Associates evaluation; 

15. HealthSouth notes; 

16. Montgomery Imaging Center MRI report; 

17. Center for Pain records; 

18. Montclair imaging reports; 

19. Initial office consultation; 

20. Transaction detail dated December 19, 2003. 

 /s/ Dennis R. Bailey

 Dennis R. Bailey 

 Attorney for Defendants 

Of counsel: 

RUSHTON, STAKELY, JOHNSTON & GARRETT, P.A. 

184 Commerce Street 

Post Office Box 270 

Montgomery, Alabama 36101-0270 

(334) 206-3234 (phone) 

(334) 481-0031 (fax) 

drb@rsjg.com (e-mail) 

Case 2:06-cv-00721-MHT-TFM Document 31 Filed 10/17/2007 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that I have served a copy of the foregoing document upon 

the following counsel of record by placing a copy of same in the United States 

Mail, first class postage prepaid, on this the 17th day of October, 2007. 

 Jock M. Smith 

 Brian P. Strength 

 Valerie Rucker Russell 

 Cochran, Cherry, Givens, Smith, Lane & Taylor 

 Post Office Box 830419 

 Tuskegee, Alabama 36083 

 /s/ Dennis R. Bailey

 Of counsel 

Case 2:06-cv-00721-MHT-TFM Document 31 Filed 10/17/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 3 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 3 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 3 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 3 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 4 of 4
Good evening, and thank you for the opportunity to speak today. My name

is David Smedick and I'm with the Sierra Club. My last name is spelled

First and foremost, I want to thank the EPA for its commitment to Carbon reductions through the Clean Power Plan. This is the critical issue of my generation and we need to act now. I am a Maryland native, an active member of the youth climate movement, and an advocate for clean energy and conservation. I was inspired to act on climate change in my teens because of my love of our natural environment. Growing up I spent my summers and winters enjoying the outdoors and visiting national parks; something 1 still enjoy whenever I get the chance. But my love of the natural world is just one of the many reasons why I am so engaged on this global problem. I am a part of this movement because climate disruption will have a deep impact on our natural environment, our economy, our health, and most importantly, our future generations. I am a part of this movement because, someday, I hope to be a father.The choices that we make today around energy and pollution will have a

lasting impact. My generation, your children's generation, and generations to come will be the ones facing the implications of these decisions and bear the true cost of our inaction on this issue. I've been listening to the many passionate speakers today, and I know you've heard the plan's impacts stated over and over. You are well aware that the Clean Power Plan has the potential to improve public health. Up to 150,000 asthma attacks prevented. More than 6,000 premature deaths avoided each year. We cannot overstate the improvements in health and quality of life that this plan would bring. Personally, I am not willing to accept a weakened version of this plan that could threaten my health and the health of future generations. Those opposed to carbon emission regulations argue that our economy and our energy system isn't ready for this. But I would implore them, and I implore you: Ask my generation. Ask the future leaders of this nation. We are ready. We are ready to take responsibility and tackle this issue. We are ready to invent , to innovate

. We are ready to work tirelessly to move beyond a system and a society that revolves around carbon emissions. Because we know what is at stake, and we have no other choice.The Clean Power Plan is a critical first step for this country to show its

commitment to action in the face of climate disruption. We have an expectation and an obligation to set the gold standard, and this plan is a step in that direction. On behalf of my own generation, the kids I hope to raise to appreciate the world around them, and the grandchildren I hope to see grow up in a place where they can breathe clean air and swim in clean water, I thank you for your dedication to a strong Clean Power Plan. And I challenge you to continue to push the envelope, to lead the way and advance these issues, even in the face of opposition.

The time is now. Thank you.
#### § 1014.5 Authority to adjust, determine, compromise, and settle.

The General Counsel, the Deputy General Counsel, the Deputy General Counsel for Legal Services, the Assistant General Counsel for Legal Counsel, and any employees of the Department designated by the General Counsel to receive and act on tort claims at Headquarters and field locations are authorized to act on claims.
§ 983.43 Procedure. ( a ) *Quorum.* A quorum of the committee shall be any seven voting committee members. The vote of a majority of members present at a meeting at which there is a quorum shall constitute the act of the committee: *Provided,* That: ( 1 ) Actions of the committee with respect to the following issues shall require twelve (12) concurring votes of the voting members regarding any recommendation to the Secretary for adoption or change in: ( i ) Quality regulation;
( ii ) Aflatoxin regulation;
( iii ) Research under § 983.46; and
( 2 ) Actions of the committee with respect to the following issues shall require eight (8) concurring votes of the voting members regarding recommendation to the Secretary for adoption or change in: ( i ) Inspection programs;
( ii ) The establishment of the committee.
( b ) *Voting.* Members of the committee may participate in a meeting by attendance in person or through the use of a conference telephone or similar communication equipment, as long as all members participating in such a meeting can communicate with one another. An action required or permitted to be taken by the committee may be taken without a meeting, if all members of the committee shall consent in writing to that action.
( c ) *Compensation.* The members of the committee and their alternates shall serve without compensation, but members and alternates acting as members shall be allowed their necessary expenses: *Provided,* That the committee may request the attendance of one or more alternates not acting as members at any meeting of the committee, and such alternates may be allowed their necessary expenses; and, *Provided further,* That the public member and the alternate for the public member may be paid reasonable compensation in addition to necessary expenses.
[69 FR 17850, Apr. 4, 2004. Redesignated and amended at 74 FR 56541, Nov. 2, 2009]
EX-35.7
(logo)WELLS FARGO

Wells Fargo Bank, NA


CMBS Department
MAC N9401-011
1055 10th Avenue S.E.
Minneapolis, MN 55414

Wells Fargo Bank, NA
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

RE: Annual Statement as to Compliance

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells
Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows for the calendar year 2012:

(a) a review of Wells Fargo's activities as Custodian under the servicing
agreement(s) listed on Schedule A hereto (the "Servicing Agreement(s)") has
been made under my supervision; and

(b) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review Wells Fargo has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material
respects throughout the reporting period.


March 19, 2013

/s/Kathleen Marshall
Kathleen Marshall
Vice President


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

(page)

To: Wells Fargo Bank, NA

Schedule A

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series

1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for COMM 2012-CCRE5 Commercial Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Custodian.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

RICHARD MARSHALL, ) 

)

Plaintiff, )

 ) CIV. ACT. NO. 2:06cv701-ID

v. )

)

CHRIS WEST, in his individual capacity, )

et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

On May 29, 2007, the court entered an order directing the parties to file a Rule

26(f) report containing the discovery plan no later than June 12, 2007, but the parties

failed to do so. (Doc. No. 15.) The parties are DIRECTED to comply with the court’s

May 29 order on or before July 26, 2007, or risk imposition of sanctions.

DONE this 18 day of July, 2007. th

 /s/ Ira DeMent 

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00701-ID-CSC Document 20 Filed 07/18/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### § 959.28 Failure to nominate.

If nominations are not made within the time and in the manner specified in § 959.27, the Secretary may, without regard to nominations, select the committee members and alternates, which selection shall be on the basis of the representation provided for in §§ 959.22 through 959.26.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 211 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        April 14, 2005.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (S. 256) to amend title 11 of the United States 
Code, and for other purposes. All points of order against the bill and against 
its consideration are waived. The bill shall be considered as read. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the bill to final passage without 
intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill equally divided 
and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
the Judiciary; and (2) one motion to recommit.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
2914.408-1 General.

(a) When only one bid is received in response to an invitation for bids, such bid may be considered

and accepted if the contracting officer makes a written determination that:

(1) The specifications used in the invitation were not unduly restrictive;

(2) Adequate competition was solicited and it could have been reasonably assumed that more than

one bid would have been submitted;

(3) The price is reasonable; and

(4) The bid is otherwise in accordance with the invitation for bids.

(b) Such a determination must be placed in the contract file.

Parent topic: Subpart 2914.4 - Opening of Bids and Award of Contract
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: John William Palmer v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-18-00367-CR

Trial court case number: 1584989

Trial court: 263rd District Court of Harris County

Appellant, John William Palmer, has filed a motion for an extension of time to file 

his brief. Because we have issued an opinion dismissing the appeal for lack of 

jurisdiction, we construe the motion as a motion seeking an extension of time to file a 

motion for rehearing. See Palmer v. State, No. 01-18-00367-CR, 2018 WL 2925712 

(Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] June 12, 2018, no pet. h.) (mem. op., not designated for 

publication). The motion is granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1, 49.8.

Appellant’s motion for rehearing, if any, is due to be filed no later than July 

12, 2018.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s /Terry Jennings

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: June 26, 2018