alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Rialto
CAPITAL(logo)   2017 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance
(Item 1123)  Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Pooling
and Servicing Agreement”) dated as of November 1, 2012 by and among GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, as Depositor,
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Pentalpha Surveillance
LLC as Operating Advisor and U.S. Bank National Association as Certificate Administrator, Custodian and Trustee relating to the
GS Mortgage Securities Trust 2012-GCJ9, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2012-GCJ9 (GSMS 2012-GCJ9)  The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors,
LLC, as special servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:  1.All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.2.A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of
January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”) in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement
has been conducted under my supervision.3.To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of
its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if
there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof
has been specifically identified herein.   Certified by:
    /s/ Adam Singer
    
    Date: March 1,
    2018Adam Singer, Managing Director
EXHIBIT
32.1







CERTIFICATION
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO


SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(b)


OR
RULE 15d-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with Amendment No. 2 to
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Tennessee Valley Authority (the “Company”)
for the year ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Tom D. Kilgore, President and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, for the purposes of complying
with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1) the Report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.














/s/
      Tom D. KilgoreTom
      D. KilgorePresident
      and Chief Executive OfficerDecember
      10,
2008
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2012, byand among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Certificate Administrator,Paying Agent and Custodian, Torchlight Loan Services, LLC, as Special Servicer,U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC,as Operating Advisor, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates Series 2012-CCRE4 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized termsused herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in theAgreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.11 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activitiesof the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 through December31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreementduring such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President 

Wells Fargo Bank 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3562 

To allocate a portion of the revenue derived from lease sales in the 181 

Area to the land and water conservation fund for use by State and 

local governments for conservation purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 23, 2006 

Mr. ALEXANDER (for himself and Mr. SALAZAR) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To allocate a portion of the revenue derived from lease sales 

in the 181 Area to the land and water conservation 

fund for use by State and local governments for conservation purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Land and Water Con5 servation Fund Investment Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 
2 

•S 3562 IS

1 (1) 181 AREA.—The term ‘‘181 Area’’ means 

2 the area identified in map 15, page 58, of the Pro3 posed Final Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas 

4 Leasing Program for 1997–2002 of the Minerals 

5 Management Service. 

6 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

7 the Secretary of the Interior. 

8 (3) SPECIAL ACCOUNT.—The term ‘‘special ac9 count’’ means the special account described in sec10 tion 3(a). 

11 SEC. 3. DISPOSITION AND USE OF 181 AREA RENTAL AND 

12 ROYALTY PAYMENTS. 

13 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 9 of the 

14 Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1338), 50 

15 percent of the bonuses, rentals, royalties, and other sums 

16 due and payable to the United States from leases in the 

17 181 Area shall be deposited into a special account in the 

18 Treasury. 

19 (b) TRANSFER OF FUNDS.—Each fiscal year the Sec20 retary of the Treasury shall transfer to the Secretary— 

21 (1) $450,000,000 from the special account; or 

22 (2) if the balance in the special account is not 

23 sufficient to transfer the full amount specified in 

24 paragraph (1)— 
3 

•S 3562 IS

1 (A) any amounts that are in the special ac2 count; and 

3 (B) from the unobligated balance of the 

4 land and water conservation fund established 

5 under section 2 of the Land and Water Con6 servation Fund Act of 1965 (16 U.S.C. 460l– 

7 5), an amount equal to the difference be8 tween— 

9 (i) $450,000,0000; and 

10 (ii) the amount transferred under sub11 paragraph (A). 

12 (c) USE OF FUNDS.—Amounts transferred to the 

13 Secretary under subsection (b) shall— 

14 (1) be made available, without further appro15 priation, to provide financial assistance to States in 

16 accordance with section 6 of the Land and Water 

17 Conservation Fund Act of 1965 (16 U.S.C. 460l–8); 

18 (2) remain available until expended; and 

19 (3) be in addition to any amounts appropriated 

20 under the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act 

21 of 1965 (16 U.S.C. 460l–4 et seq.). 

Æ
§ 1705.05 Processing of requests. ( a ) *Requests in writing.* The Privacy Act Officer will acknowledge receipt of the request within five working days of its receipt in the Board's offices. The acknowledgment will advise the requester if any additional information is needed to process the request. Within fifteen working days of receipt of the request, the Privacy Act Officer will provide the requested information or will explain to the requester why additional time is needed for response.
( b ) *Requests in person.* Following the initial call from the requester, the Privacy Act Officer will determine ( 1 ) whether the records identified by the requester exist, and
( 2 ) whether they are subject to any exemption under § 1705.11 below. If the records exist and are not subject to exemption, the Privacy Act Officer will call the requester and arrange an appointment at a mutually agreeable time when the records can be examined. The requester may be accompanied by one person of his or her own choosing, and should state during this call whether or not a second individual will be present at the appointment. At the appointment, the requester will be asked to present identification as stated in § 1705.04(a)(2).
( c ) *Excluded information.* If a request is received for information compiled in reasonable anticipation of litigation, the Privacy Act Officer will inform the requester that this information is not subject to release under the Privacy Act (*see* 5 U.S.C. 552a(d)(5)).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v ) CR. NO. 2:06CR200-WHA

)

ROSA E. RICON )

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Motion to Substitute Attorney at Arraignment (doc. #34)

filed by the defendant, it is

ORDERED that the motion be and is hereby GRANTED. 

Done this 25 day of August, 2006. th

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 35 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK , NC 27711


# APR 82

# 201 OFFICE OF AIR QU A L ITY P LANNING AN D STA N DARDS MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: FROM:
TO: Extension of Comment Period for I Oth Conference on Air Quality Modeling George M Bridgers, Model Clearinghouse Director

### d}~~**~** Air Quality Modeling Group , C439-01 Docket#: EPA-HQ

-OAR-2012-0056
In the January 31,2012 Federal Notice publication regarding the l Oth Conference on Air Quality Modeling (Modeling Conference), it was announced that the public comment period on how the Agency determines and app lies air quality models and on material presented at the Modeling Conference would remain open through April 16, 2012
. In consideration ofthe extensive amount ofmaterial provided for review just ahead of and presented at the Modeling Conference , we are extending the comment period by two weeks to allow more time for commenters to assemble and provide their constructive comments, recommendations , and feedback. With the submission oft hi s memorandum to the Docket (EPA

-HQ-OAR-2012-0056) , the comment period for the 1Oth Conference on Air Quality Modeling is herby extended to April 30, 2012. All comments should be submitted to the Docket by the close of business on April30 and per the instructions that were provided in the Federal Register publication. If there are any questions regarding this comment period extension, please contact George Bridgers ofEPA ' s Air Quality Modeling Group at (919) 541-5563 or bridgers.george @ epa. gov.

Recyc led/Recyclable • P rinted wfth Vegetabl e 0 11 Based In ks o n 1 00% Recycled Paper (40% Post consumer)
§ 205.11 Order of precedence. ( a ) If there is any conflict or inconsistency between the provisions of this part and any other provision of this chapter, the provisions of this part shall control with respect to procedure.
( b ) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, subpart I of part 212 of this chapter shall control with respect to prenotification and reporting and subpart J of part 212 of this chapter shall control with respect to accounting and financial reporting requirements.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

DELOISE PRICE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv721-MHT

) 

WAL-MART STORES, INC., and )

EXTREME PERFORMANCE, INC., )

)

Defendants. )

 RULE 26(F) ORDER

The parties are reminded of the obligation, imposed

by Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to

confer and to develop a proposed discovery plan.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Rule 26(f) report

containing the discovery plan shall be filed as soon as

practicable but not later than September 25, 2006.

The longstanding practice in this district is that

dispositive motions shall be filed no later than 90 days

prior to the pretrial date. If the parties seek to vary

from that schedule, they should present, in the plan,

specific case-related reasons for the requested variance.

Case 2:06-cv-00721-MHT-TFM Document 7 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 1 of 3
2

In their Rule 26(f) report, however, the parties should

assume that the 90-day requirement will apply.

This case will be set for trial before the

undersigned judge during one of that judge's regularly

scheduled civil trial terms, within 7 to 10 months of

this order if a term is available and, if not available,

then as soon as possible thereafter. The pretrial date

is normally set within four to six weeks of a scheduled

trial term. The dates of each judge's civil trial terms

are available on the court's website located at

<http://almd.uscourts.gov> in the civil case information

section.

The court may or may not hold a scheduling conference

before issuing a scheduling order. If the court holds a

scheduling conference, counsel may participate in the

scheduling conference by conference call.

The scheduling order entered by the court will follow

the form of the Uniform Scheduling Order adopted by the

Case 2:06-cv-00721-MHT-TFM Document 7 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 2 of 3
judges of this court. The Uniform Scheduling Order is

also available on the court's website.

The report of the parties should comply with Form 35

of the Appendix of Forms to the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

DONE, this the 12th day of September, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00721-MHT-TFM Document 7 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 3 of 3
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

JAMES KUCZMASKI, etc., )

et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv731-MHT

) 

US FOODSERVICE, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the joint motion to stay pending

mediation (doc. no. 34) is denied. The court believes

that the parties should pursue mediation while this case

is still ongoing. 

DONE, this the 14th day of June, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 35 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 1 of 1
747.507 Contract clauses.

Contracting officer must insert the clause at 752.247–70 in solicitations and contracts solely for

ocean transportation services, and in solicitations and contracts for goods and ocean transportation

services when the ocean transportation will be fixed at the time the contract is awarded. Contracting

officer must use (48 CFR) FAR 52.247–64 as prescribed in (48 CFR) FAR 47.507(a) in other

situations.

Parent topic: Subpart 747.5—Ocean Transportation by U.S.-Flag Vessels
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CHRISTINE BENNETT, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.:

v ) 1:06-CV-723-MHT

)

ARMY FLEET SUPPORT )

SERVICES, LLC, )

)

Defendant. )

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

Comes now, Jon C. Goldfarb, of the law firm Wiggins, Childs, Quinn &

Pantazis, L.L.C, The Kress Building, 301 19

th St. N., Birmingham, Alabama 35203,

and hereby appears as counsel for the Plaintiff in the above-styled case.

Respectfully submitted,

s/Jon C. Goldfarb

Jon C. Goldfarb (ASB-5401-F58J)

Ethan R. Dettling (ASB-9067-T68E)

Counsel for Plaintiff

OF COUNSEL:

Wiggins, Childs, Quinn & Pantazis, LLC

The Kress Building

301 19

th Street North

Birmingham, Alabama 35203

Telephone No.: (205) 314-0500

Facsimile No.: (205) 254-1500

Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 11 Filed 09/15/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing

document has been properly filed with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system

which will send electronic notification to the following counsel of record:

Kirk Cordell Shaw

Mary Carol Ladd

Ambrecht Jackson LLP

PO Box 290

Mobile, AL 36601-0290

251-405-1302

Fax: 251-432-6843

Email: kcs@ajlaw.com

Email: mcl@ajlaw.com

on this the 15

th

day of September , 2006.

s/Jon C. Goldfarb

OF COUNSEL

Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 11 Filed 09/15/2006 Page 2 of 2
# 5128.370 Additional clauses.

(a)(2)  The head of the contracting activity makes the decision at DFARS 228.370(a)(2).  See Appendix GG for further delegation.  

**Parent topic:**Subpart 5128.3 - Insurance
Exhibit 13.1

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F (the Report) of QIWI plc (the Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2014 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, Sergey Solonin, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Alexander Karavaev, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.



|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Sergey Solonin    
|Name:                  |  | Sergey Solonin         
|Title:                 |  | Chief Executive Officer
|Date:                  |  | March 12, 2015         
|                      
|/s/ Alexander Karavaev
|Name:                  |  | Alexander Karavaev     
|Title:                 |  | Chief Financial Officer
|Date:                  |  | March 12, 2015         

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Subpart 1643.2—Changes

Parent topic: PART 1643—CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS

1643.205-70 Contract clause.

The clause set forth in section 1652.243–70 shall be inserted in all FEHB Program contracts.
2409.507-2 Contract clauses.

The Contracting Officer shall insert a clause substantially the same as the clause at 2452.209-71,

Limitation on Future Contracts, in solicitations and contracts for services above the simplified

acquisition threshold whenever the Contracting Officer has reason to believe that the nature of the

proposed contract requirements may present an organizational conflict of interest as defined at FAR

subpart 9.5. The Contracting Officer shall describe in the clause the nature of the potential conflict

and the negotiated terms and duration of the limitation. The Contracting Officer shall insert the

clause at 2452.209-72, Organizational Conflicts of Interest, in all solicitations and contracts.

Parent topic: Subpart 2409.5 - Organizational and Consultant Conflicts of Interest
# Subpart 2848.1 - Policies and Procedures

**Parent topic:**PART 2848 - VALUE ENGINEERING

## 2848.102 Policies.

The HCA is the agency head for purposes of FAR 48.102(a).
#### In the Matter of Patricia D. (Anonymous), Appellant, v. Richard C. (Anonymous) , Respondent.

In a filiation proceeding, petitioner appeals from two orders of the Family Court, Queens County, dated July 18, 1969 and September 17, 1969, respectively, the first granting her counsel fees of $700 for the trial and hearing and $500 for opposing an appeal from an order of filiation, plus printing expenses, and the second denying her motion for counsel fees for opposing -an appeal from a support order. Order dated July 18, 1969 affirmed, without costs, and order dated September 17, 1969 reversed, without costs, and petitioner is granted $500 counsel fees for services rendered for opposing the appeal from the order of support. In our opinion it was an improvident exercise of discretion to decline to allow petitioner counsel fees for services to be rendered in connection with respondent’s appeal from the order of support. Section 438 of the Family Court Act provides, *inter alia,*that *“*In any proceeding * * * by a person on behalf of children only * * * including an appeal under article ten the court may allow counsel fees at any stage of the proceeding, to the attorney representing the * *K*person on behalf of children.” In view of the fact that the Family Court granted petitioner counsel fees for services to be rendered in connection with the appeal from the order of filiation, it should similarly have granted such an allowance in connection with the appeal from the order of support, since it is not alleged that petitioner’s financial condition or ability to pay in any way changed in the interim (cf. *Matter of Jaeger*v. *Scherer,*24 A D 2d 878; *Matter of Giacoman*
      *1010v. *Boer,*23 A D 2d 737). Christ, P. J., Munder, Martuscello, Latham and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
     EXHIBIT 11 - STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                  March 31, 1997     
---------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Fully
                                            Primary          Diluted 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                        <C>              <C>
Net income                                 $4,368,624      $4,368,624
 
Weighted average shares outstanding         9,418,499       9,418,499
Common stock equivalents due to 
  outstanding options                         113,846         116,073  
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Adjusted shares outstanding                 9,532,345       9,534,572

Earnings per share                              $0.46           $0.46  

</TABLE>
[CAPTION]
<TABLE>
                                                  March 31, 1996     
---------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Fully
                                            Primary          Diluted 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                        <C>              <C>
Net income                                 $3,769,514      $3,769,514
 
Weighted average shares outstanding         9,270,598       9,270,598

Earnings per share                              $0.41           $0.41 

</TABLE>

<PAGE>