alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.2





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm








We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:


|    |                                                                                                                                 
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-219970) and the related prospectus of Pattern Energy Group Inc. (the “Company”), and

|    |                                                                                                                                 
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-191641), pertaining to Pattern Energy Group Inc.’s 2013 Equity Incentive Award Plan.

of (i) our report dated March 1, 2018, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Pattern Energy Group Inc., (ii) our report dated February 28, 2018, with respect to the financial statements of K2 Wind Ontario Limited Partnership, and (iii) our report dated March 28, 2019 with respect to the financial statements of Pattern Energy Group Holdings 2 LP, all included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) of Pattern Energy Group Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2018.





/s/ Ernst & Young LLP





San Francisco, California


March 28, 2019
Exhibit 10.4


 


Fiscal 2010 Variable Compensation Plan Scale for Named Executive
Officers


 


	
  First Half FY 2010 VCP Scale

  	
   

  	
  Second Half FY 2010 VCP Scale

  	
   

  
	
  Pro Forma EBITDA %

  	
   

  	
  Payout

  	
   

  	
  Pro Forma EBITDA %

  	
   

  	
  Payout

  	
   

  
	
  [*]

  	
   

  	
  0

  	
  %

  	
  [*]

  	
   

  	
  0

  	
  %

  
	
  [*]

  	
   

  	
  [*]

  	
  %

  	
  [*]

  	
   

  	
  [*]

  	
  %

  
	
  [*]

  	
   

  	
  [*]

  	
  %

  	
  [*]

  	
   

  	
  [*]

  	
  %

  
	
  [*]

  	
   

  	
  [*]

  	
  %

  	
  [*]

  	
   

  	
  [*]

  	
  %

  
	
  [*]

  	
   

  	
  100

  	
  %

  	
  [*]

  	
   

  	
  200

  	
  %

  
	
  Revenue Threshold $[*]

  	
   

  	
  Revenue Threshold $[*]

  	
   

  
	
  Pre-tax Profit Threshold
  $[*]

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  



 






[*]  CERTAIN INFORMATION ON THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN
OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.  CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT HAS BEEN REQUESTED
WITH RESPECT TO THE OMITTED PORTIONS.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

 _______________________________

HOWARD GLENN TOOLE, #C 917683 *

Petitioner, *

 v. * 2:06-CV-714-MHT

JAMES MCDONOUGH, et al., * 

Respondents. *

 _______________________________

ORDER ON MOTION

Upon consideration of Petitioner’s motion for extension of time, and for good cause,

it is ORDERED that

1. Petitioner’s motion (Doc. No. 4) be and is hereby GRANTED;

2. Petitioner is GRANTED an extension from August 28, 2006 to September 21, 2006

to comply with the court’s August 14, 2006 order. 

Done this 7th day of September 2006.

/s/ Vanzetta Penn McPherson

VANZETTA PENN MCPHERSON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00714-MHT-WC Document 5 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

M IDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABA M A

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

February 14, 2007

NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE

To: ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD

Case Style: Alston v. Askew et al

Case Number: 3:06cv00722-WKW

Referenced Pleading: RESPONSES to Discovery Request

Docket Entry Number: 13 & 14

The referenced pleadings were electronically filed on ***February 13, 2007*** in this case and

are not in compliance with the local rules and/or administrative procedures of this court. 

******These pleadings are discovery and are not allowed pursuant to Local Rule 5.1 NONFILING OF CIVIL DISCOVERY.

The pleadings are hereby STRICKEN from the record and the parties are instructed to

disregard the entry of these pleadings on the court’s docket. Parties should be aware that the

striking of these entries does not affect their responsibilities as to the discovery process.

Case 3:06-cv-00722-WKW-TFM Document 15 Filed 02/14/2007 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

ANGELA PRICE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) Civil Action No.

vs. )

 ) 3:06-cv-742-MEF

ROANOKE CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION, )

Defendant.

______________________________________________________________________________

NOTICE CONCERNING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND MEDIATION

Pursuant to the Court’s Scheduling Order, the undersigned and counsel for defendant met

face to face on August 8, 2007 and engaged in a good faith settlement discussion. No settlement was

reached and the parties do not believe that mediation would assist in resolving the case.

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Adam M. Porter 

 Adam M. Porter 

Attorney for Plaintiff

 2301 Morris Avenue, Suite 102

Birmingham, Alabama 35203

Voice- (205) 322-8999

Facsimile- (205) 322-8915

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 10, 2007 I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk

of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to Donald B.

Sweeney, Jr., Esq Bradley Arant Rose & White LLP One Federal Place 1819 Fifth Avenue North

Birmingham, AL 35203-2104 and that there are no non-CM/ECF participants in this case.

s/ Adam M. Porter 

Attorney for Plaintiff

Case 3:06-cv-00742-MEF-WC Document 24 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM OUR MARCH
31, 1997 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000
<CURRENCY>                          U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                        MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                           1.000
<CASH>                                    2,058
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                    7,180
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                              0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                              0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>              12,152
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                   20,944
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                     20,870
<LOANS>                                  64,742
<ALLOWANCE>                                 641
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          111,039
<DEPOSITS>                               98,027
<SHORT-TERM>                                655
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         744
<LONG-TERM>                                 363
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                  3,568
<OTHER-SE>                                7,682
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>          111,039
<INTEREST-LOAN>                           1,445
<INTEREST-INVEST>                           508
<INTEREST-OTHER>                             30
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                          1,983
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          839
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          850
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                     1,133
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                30
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                            0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             731
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             505
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                  505
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                362
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              0.97
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0.97
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                             4.71
<LOANS-NON>                                 247
<LOANS-PAST>                                 11
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                              0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                               0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                            623
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                13
<RECOVERIES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                           641
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                        641
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                           0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                       0
        


</TABLE>
DENY; and Opinion Filed April 22, 2014.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-14-00437-CV

IN RE JAMES MCCOY, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 44th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-13955-B

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Moseley, Fillmore, and Evans 

Opinion by Justice Fillmore

Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in which he contends the trial court has 

violated a ministerial duty by failing to rule on his motion to compel service of process on 

William Hill. By order dated April 9, 2014, the Court requested and received a clerk’s record 

from the trial court. The clerk’s record reflects that the trial court issued citation to William Hill 

on January 7, 2014, at the address reflected in the amended petition filed by relator in the trial 

court. The clerk’s record further reflects that the sheriff of Dallas County filed a return of 

service indicating that citation could not be served on William Hill because he no longer worked

at the listed address. Because the trial court has taken the action relator has requested, the issue 

presented in relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is moot. In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 

166 S.W.3d 732, 737 (Tex. 2005) (“A case becomes moot if a controversy ceases to exist 

between the parties at any stage of the legal proceedings.”); State Bar of Tex. v. Gomez, 891 

S.W.2d 243, 245 (Tex. 1994) (stating that, for a controversy to be justiciable, there must be a real 
–2–

controversy between the parties that will be actually resolved by the judicial relief sought); Dow 

Chem. Co. v. Garcia, 909 S.W.2d 503, 505 (Tex. 1995) (court will not issue mandamus if it 

would be useless or unavailing). Accordingly, the Court DENIES the petition for writ of 

mandamus.

140437F.P05

/Robert M. Fillmore/

ROBERT M. FILLMORE

JUSTICE
§ 1304.109 Requests for correction of records. ( a ) *Correction requests.* Any person is entitled to request correction of his or her record(s) covered under the Act. The request must be made in writing and should be addressed to Privacy Act Officer; U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board; 2300 Clarendon Blvd., Suite 1300; Arlington, VA 22201. The letter should clearly identify the corrections desired. In most circumstances, an edited copy of the record will be acceptable for this purpose.
( b ) *Initial response.* Receipt of a correction request will be acknowledged by the Privacy Act Officer in writing within 5 working days. The Privacy Act Officer will endeavor to provide a letter to the requester within 20 working days stating whether the request for correction has been granted or denied. If the Privacy Act Officer denies any part of the correction request, the reasons for the denial will be provided to the requester.
162 So.2d 576

#### Edgar J. SIMON, Sr., Individually and for the Use and Benefit of his Minor Daughter, Verna Simon, v. PLAYLAND AMUSEMENTS et al.

No. 47207.

April 17, 1964.

In re: Edgar J. Simon, Sr., individually and for the use and benefit of his minor daughter, Verna Simon applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 160 So.2d 834.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal we find no error of law in its judgment.

SUMMERS, J., is of the opinion that the writ should be refused, however, I do not agree that the duty of care of a playground operator is the same as a store operator.
H. Res. 161

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

March 16, 2005.

Resolved, That the following named Member be and is

hereby elected to the following standing committee of the

House of Representatives:

(1) COMMITTEE ON RULES.—Ms. Matsui.

Attest:

Clerk.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3362 

To exempt woven fiberglass mesh fabric from certain quotas. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 5, 2006 

Mr. CHAMBLISS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To exempt woven fiberglass mesh fabric from certain quotas. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. WOVEN FIBERGLASS MESH FABRIC. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi5 sion of law, the quota imposed under category 622 estab6 lished pursuant to the Committee for the Implementation 

7 of Textile Agreements (CITA) with respect to certain tex8 tile and apparel articles shall not apply to woven fiberglass 

9 mesh fabric provided for in subheading 7019.40.40 of the 

10 Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The provision in subsection 

12 (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•S 3362 IS

1 for consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date 

2 of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
228 So.2d 481

#### Joseph F. ROCKHOLT et al. v. Thomas S. KEATY.

No. 50157.

Dec. 11, 1969.

In re: Joseph F. Rockholt et al. applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 226 So.2d 76.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
EXHIBIT 32.2 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
               RULE 13a-14(b)


In connection with the Quarter Report of Gallery of History, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Rod Lynam, Chief Financial Office of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

1.	 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Rod Lynam
Rod Lynam
Chief Financial Officer

February 14, 2006




A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 930.27 Vacancies.

To fill any vacancy occasioned by the failure of any person appointed as a member or as an alternate member of the Board to qualify, or in the event of the death, removal, resignation, or disqualification of any member or alternate member of the Board, a successor for the unexpired term of such member or alternate member of the Board shall be appointed by the Secretary from the most recent list of nominations for the Board made by growers and handlers, from nominations made by the Board, or from other qualified individuals. Any nominations made by the Board to fill a vacancy must be received by the Secretary within 90 days of the effective date of the vacancy. Board members wishing to resign from the Board must do so in writing to the Secretary.
H. Res. 133

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

March 8, 2005.

Resolved, That there shall be available from the applicable accounts of the House of Representatives such amounts

as may be necessary for continuing expenses of standing and

select committees of the House for the period beginning on

April 1, 2005, and ending on April 30, 2005, on the same

terms and conditions as amounts were available to such committees for the period beginning at noon on January 3, 2005,

and ending at midnight on March 31, 2005, pursuant to

clause 7 of rule X of the Rules of the House of Representatives (or, in the case of the Committee on Homeland Security, on the same terms and conditions as amounts were

available to such Committee for such period pursuant to

House Resolution 10, agreed to January 4, 2005).

Attest:

Clerk.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 240 (Wednesday, December 15, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 78269]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31486]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Office of Justice Programs

[OJP (NIJ) Docket No. 1538]


Vehicular Digital Multimedia Evidence Recording System (VDMERS) 
Standard for Law Enforcement

AGENCY: National Institute of Justice, Department of Justice.

ACTION: Notice of Draft VDMERS Standard for Law Enforcement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In an effort to obtain comments from interested parties, the 
U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National 
Institute of Justice (NIJ) will make available to the general public 
the draft ``Vehicular Digital Multimedia Evidence Recording System 
Standard for Law Enforcement.'' The opportunity to provide comments on 
this voluntary standard is open to industry technical representatives, 
law enforcement agencies and organizations, research, development and 
scientific communities, and all other stakeholders and interested 
parties. Those individuals wishing to obtain and provide comments on 
the draft standard under consideration are directed to the following 
Web site: http://www.justnet.org.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 31, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Casandra Robinson, by telephone at 
202-305-2596 [Note: this is not a toll-free telephone number], or by e-
mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a8cbc9dbc9c6ccdac986dac7cac1c6dbc7c6e8dddbccc7c286cfc7de"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5e3d3f2d3f303a2c3f702c313c37302d31301e2b2d3a313470393128">[email protected]</span></a>.

John H. Laub,
Director, National Institute of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2010-31486 Filed 12-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, :

:

PLAINTIFF, :

:

v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv736-WKW

:

SEVENTY FOUR THOUSAND SEVEN :

HUNDRED ($74,700) DOLLARS IN :

UNITED STATES CURRENCY, :

:

DEFENDANT. :

NOTICE OF MEDIATION AND SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

The United States of America, by and through Leura G. Canary,

United States Attorney, Middle District of Alabama, and John T.

Harmon, Assistant United States Attorney, states as follows:

The parties have discussed settlement but no resolution has

been reached. Settlement discussions will continue. Mediation

would not assist the parties in reaching settlement.

Respectfully submitted this 6th day of March, 2007.

FOR THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

 LEURA G. CANARY

/s/John T. Harmon 

John T. Harmon

Assistant United States Attorney

Office of the United States Attorney

Middle District of Alabama

Post Office Box 197

Montgomery, Alabama 36101-0197

Telephone:(334) 223-7280

Facsimile:(334) 223-7560

Case 2:06-cv-00736-WKW-SRW Document 16 Filed 03/06/2007 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on March 6, 2007, I electronically filed

the foregoing Notice of Mediation and Settlement Conference with

the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send

notification of such filing to the following: Bruce Maddox.

/s/John T. Harmon 

John T. Harmon

Assistant United States Attorney

Case 2:06-cv-00736-WKW-SRW Document 16 Filed 03/06/2007 Page 2 of 2
|    |                                                                           |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A  of MiMedx Group, Inc.; |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | /s/: Parker H. Petit |   |
|   | Parker H. Petit |   |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |   |
156 So.2d 475

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Chester GREEN (consolidated cases).

No. 46886.

Oct. 2, 1963.

In re: Chester Green applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writs refused. The ruling of the judge as to the question of lack of venue is correct. Applicant’s rights under his plea of unconstitutionality are reserved in the event of conviction.
The State of 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 15, 2014

No. 04-14-00125-CR

Juan MARTINEZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 5481

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On July 14, 2014, the court reporter filed a notification of late record stating that she 

anticipated that the reporter’s record will be completed by August 25, 2014. The notification of 

late record is NOTED. The reporter’s record is due on August 25, 2014.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of July, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Viking Minerals Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles Irizarry,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of
October 5, 2010.


/s/ Charles Irizarry
----------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer