alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
608.7003 Acquisitions on behalf of other

Federal agencies.

(a) Acquisition of U.S. manufactured vehicles.

(1) GSA is the mandatory source for official vehicles purchased in the United States for all Federal

agencies. Non-DOS agencies must have a waiver from GSA that allows them to acquire official

vehicles from sources in the United States other than GSA, in accordance with the Federal Property

Management Regulation, 41 CFR 101–38.104.

(2) DOS overseas contracting activities shall not obtain GSA waivers or acquire vehicles through

GSA or directly from sources in the United States on behalf of other agencies. Requests to acquire

vehicles in this manner shall be returned to the requesting agency without action, and the agency

instructed to use its own contracting personnel or GSA for this purpose.

(b) Acquisition from non-U.S. sources. No GSA waiver is required for official vehicles purchased

outside the United States from non-U.S. sources. Normal acquisition procedures shall be followed.

However, contracting officers should be aware that statutory ceilings apply to the acquisition of

passenger vehicles (i.e., sedans and station wagons) (see P.L. 103–329), so other agencies shall not

request that posts acquire vehicles without providing an analysis of how the price compares with

this ceiling.

Parent topic: Subpart 608.70—Acquisition of Official Vehicles by Overseas Contracting Activities
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from unaudited
financial statements for the nine month period ending September 30, 1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
<CIK>  0000763399
<NAME> SPRINGHILL LAKE INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY>                              U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                1
<CASH>                                                 2,484,553
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            479,335
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               0
<PP&E>                                                98,384,022
<DEPRECIATION>                                       (44,317,746)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        63,138,082
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          0
<BONDS>                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                            (1,334,245)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          63,138,082
<SALES>                                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      19,711,745      
<CGS>                                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      18,821,250 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     4,137,669
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          428,960
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      428,960
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                             428,960
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                627
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                627
        


</TABLE>
Case 2:06-cr-00193-MEF-CSC Document 23 Filed 08/31/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cr-00193-MEF-CSC Document 23 Filed 08/31/2006 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

BELINDA GAIL BROWN, )

)

PLAINTIFF, )

)

VS. ) CIVIL ACTION: 3:06cv00710-MHT

)

LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE )

COMPANY, et al., )

)

DEFENDANTS. )

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR

RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

COMES NOW Plaintiff in the above styled cause and moves this Court for an extension of

fourteen (14) days for response to the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant. Plaintiff

shows unto the Court that Defendant has not yet produced documents requested from the files of

Plaintiff. Plaintiff has been assured that these documents are on their way. These documents are

essential for a response to this Motion and counsel for the Defendant has consented to the extension.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays that the Court will give a fourteen (14) day extension for

response to this Motion.

s/Stephen D. Heninger 

Stephen D. Heninger

Attorney for: Plaintiff

Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC

P. O. Box 11310

Birmingham, Alabama 35202

Telephone: 205.326.3336

Facsimile: 205.326.3332

E-mail: Steve@hgdlawfirm.com

[ASB5227E68S]

Case 3:06-cv-00710-MHT-TFM Document 12 Filed 05/15/2007 Page 1 of 2
-2-

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on May 15, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of

the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following:

Richard B. Garrett, Esq.

RUSHTON, STAKELY, JOHNSTON

 & GARRETT, P.A.

P. O. Box 270

Montgomery, Alabama 36101-0270

Telephone: 334.206.3100

Facsimile: 334.263.4157

E-Mail: rbg@rsjg.com

s/Stephen D. Heninger 

Stephen D. Heninger [ASB5227E68S]

Case 3:06-cv-00710-MHT-TFM Document 12 Filed 05/15/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### § 945.112 Terms.

Terms used in this subpart shall have the same meaning as when used in the marketing agreement and order, both as amended.
#### § 987.64 Reports on disposition of restricted, other marketable, utility, and cull dates.

Each handler disposing of any dates pursuant to §§ 987.55 and 987.56 shall promptly thereafter report such disposition to the Committee in such form as the Committee may prescribe.

[43 FR 4253, Feb. 1, 1978]
#### § 959.54 Safeguards.

The committee, with the approval of the Secretary, may establish through rules such requirements as may be necessary to establish that shipments made pursuant to § 959.53 were handled and used for the purpose stated.
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

07/14

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 14 Jul 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7370

STEPHEN LOUIS MOORE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GARY T. DIXON; J. B. FRENCH; ROBEY LEE; KEN

HARRIS; R. D. BRITTON; BENNIE MACK; CARLTON

JOYNER; FRANKLIN E. FREEMAN, JR.; LYNN

PHILLIPS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge.

(CA-93-644-5-CT-BR)

Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 4, 1996

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen Louis Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Jacob Leonard Safron,

Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate

judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Moore v. Dixon,

No. CA-93-644-5-CT-BR (E.D.N.C. Aug. 23, 1995). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### PEOPLE v. STRAUSS.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

December 18, 1914.)

1. Criminal Law (§ 627%*)—Inspection op Grand Jury Minutes—Right to Inspect.

Where accused delayed nearly a year after indictment and arraignment, before moving for leave to inspect the minutes of the grand jury, for the purpose of moving to dismiss the indictment because the facts before that body were not sufficient to warrant it, his motion must be denied on account of laches.

[Ed. Note.—Por other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 1431, 1434, 1435; Dee. Dig. § 627%.*]

2. Criminal Law (§ 1023*)—Appeal—Orders Appealable.

A motion for leave to inspect the minutes of the grand jury, so as to move to dismiss on the ground the evidence did not warrant the indictment, is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and a denial is not appealable.

[Ed. Note.—Por other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2583-2598; Dec. Dig. § 1023.*]

Appeal from Nassau County Court.

Samuel Strauss was indicted. From an order denying his motion for leave to inspect the minutes of the grand jury, for the purpose of making a motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground the facts did not warrant it, he appeals. Affirmed. \

Argued before JENKS, P. J., and BURR, THOMAS, RICH, and PUTNAM, JJ.

Charles Pope Caldwell, of New York City, for appellant.

Charles R. Weeks, Asst. Dist. Atty., of Mineola, for the People.

*

For other eases see same topic *&*§ number in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep’r Indexes

RICH, J.

This appeal is from an order of the County Court of Nassau County, denying defendant’s motion for leave to inspect the minutes of the grand jury for the purpose of making a motion to dismiss such indictment upon the ground that the facts before that body were not sufficient to warrant the findings of the indictment. The in*992dictment is for seduction under promise of marriage; it was found on October 24, 1913; the defendant was arraigned on the 29th of that month, and after pleading not guilty was released, pending trial, on bail.

[1, 2] The motion was properly denied on the ground of laches, and the order must be affirmed; but'there is another reason for the affirmance. The motion was addressed to the sound discretion of the court, the order is not appealable, and we are therefore without power to review it. Matter of Montgomery, 126 App. Div. 72, 110 N. Y. Supp. 793; People v. Wendel, 128 App. Div. 437, 438, 112 N. Y. Supp. 837; People v. Zerillo, 140 App. Div.. 902, 125 N. Y. Supp. 1137.

The order of the County Court of Nassau County must be affirmed. All concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM RENT-A-WRECK
OF AMERICA,  INC.'S 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTERLY  PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-QSB.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,978,862
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,634,090
<ALLOWANCES>                                   809,361
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,182,746
<PP&E>                                         688,222
<DEPRECIATION>                                 351,851
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,726,823
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,339,767
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           13,660
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        40,358
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,333,038
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,726,823
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,296,303
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,944,709
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,356,488
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                67,797
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,339
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                979,745
<INCOME-TAX>                                   302,224
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            677,521
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   677,521
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12
        

</TABLE>
§ 984.480 Books and other records. Each handler shall maintain true and complete records of all inshell and shelled walnuts and walnut material, by categories, received, held, or disposed of by him. The records shall be maintained in such form as to permit verification of all transactions involved and shall be made available during normal business hours to authorized representatives of the Board or the Secretary of Agriculture. These records shall include the following: ( a ) The names and addresses of the persons from whom received, and the quantities received from each such person;
( b ) The names and addresses of the persons to whom disposal is made, and the quantities disposed of to each such person;
( c ) The quantities used by the handler for such purposes as manufacturing, production of oil, and livestock feeding; and
( d ) The quantities held on September 1, January 1, and April 1 of each marketing year.
[40 FR 22268, May 22, 1975, as amended at 74 FR 56697, Nov. 3, 2009]
## Recovering from Identity Theft

Is someone using your personal information to open accounts, file taxes, or make purchases? Visit IdentityTheft.gov, the federal government’s one-stop resource to help you report and recover from identity theft.

##  Data Breach? Lost Info?

Did you get a notice that says a company lost your personal information in a data breach? Did you lose your wallet? Or learn that an online account was hacked? Here are steps you can take to help protect yourself from identity theft.

 

## Protecting Your Identity

What can you do to keep your personal info secure? Are identity protection services worth the cost? What about credit freezes? Check out the FTC’s identity theft articles to find out.

 

## Free Resources for Your Community

You can help people learn about identity theft — whether you’re chatting with friends and family, sharing info on a social networking site, or taking resources to a religious group or PTA meeting. It’s easy to use and share these free resources from the FTC.
                                - Free Identity Theft Resources  Free booklets — in English and Spanish — can help people in your community protect their identity and recover if an identity thief strikes.
                                - Identity theft videos   Post our videos on your blog or site. Use the “share” button in the upper right corner of the videos. 

**5 Ways to Help Protect Your Identity**

Share this video using the links in the player above or use the YouTube version.

 

**IdentityTheft.gov Helps You Report and Recover from Identity Theft**

Share this video using the links in the player above or use the YouTube version.

 

## For Law Enforcement

Local police can help identity theft victims by:
                                - encouraging them to create an Identity Theft Report and get a personal recovery plan at  IdentityTheft.gov
                                - sharing  free identity theft resources from the FTC
                                - taking a police report if asked. Some businesses require a police report to remove fraudulent debts from a victim's account.

## For Attorneys and Advocates

The FTC’s IdentityTheft.gov can assist attorneys who counsel identity theft victims. The site provides victims with a personal recovery plan, walking through each step to take. It also provides pre-filed letters and forms to send to credit bureaus, businesses, and debt collectors.

 

## For Businesses

Many companies keep sensitive information about customers or employees in their files or on their network. The FTC hasfree data security resources to help businesses of any size protect their customers and meet their legal obligations, and free resources especially designed to help small businesses protect against cyber attacks.

 

**Return to top
Subpart 931.1 - Applicability

Parent topic: PART 931 - CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES

931.102 Fixed-price contracts.

The intent of the first sentence of 48 CFR 31.102 is that applicable subparts of 48 CFR part 31 shall

be used by the Government in -

(a) Pricing fixed-price prime contracts and modifications,

(b) Evaluating the reasonableness of a prime contractor's (or prospective prime contractor's)

proposed subcontract (or subcontract modification) prices, and

(c) Determining the allowability of contractor payments to subcontractors in accordance with the

provisions of 48 CFR 31.204(b).
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 23, 2024

NO. 03-22-00464-CV

Daniel James Caldwell, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas for the Protection of Jennifer Zimmerman, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, KELLY, AND SMITH

AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART -- OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH

This is an appeal from the order signed by the trial court on July 15, 2022. We dismiss 

Caldwell’s original habeas application for want of jurisdiction. Having otherwise reviewed the 

record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the trial 

court’s order. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s order in all other respects. The 

appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
#### LLOYD, Respondent, v. SILVERTHORNE, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 27, 1914.)

Action by Demarest Lloyd against William E. Silverthorne. C. U. Carruth, of New York City, for appellant. II. J. Roig, of New York City, for respondent.

No opinion. Order modified, by limiting requirement for bill of particulars to matter called for in second paragraph of demand, and, as modified, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to appellant. Order filed.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1045

#### Editorial Notes:Nomenclature changes to part 1045 appear at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023, and 88 FR 82238, Nov. 24, 2023.

§ 1045.95 What are the criteria used to assign levels to RD, FRD, or TFNI?

Editorial Notes:

Nomenclature changes to part 1045 appear at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023, and 88 FR 82238, Nov. 24, 2023.

(a) When the Director, Office of Classification, makes the initial determination that information is RD, he or she determines the appropriate level of the information based on the damage that would occur if there was an unauthorized disclosure of the information. The Director, Office of Classification, also determines the level for TFNI, and, jointly with the appropriate DoD official (as specified in DoD Instruction 5210.02 or successor instructions) determines the level for FRD information.

(b) The three classification levels of RD, FRD, and TFNI are:

(1) *Top Secret.* Top Secret is applied to information that is vital to the national security the unauthorized disclosure of which could reasonably be expected to cause exceptionally grave damage to the national security that the appropriate official is able to identify or describe.

(2) *Secret.* Secret is applied to information, the unauthorized disclosure of which could reasonably be expected to cause serious damage to the national security that the appropriate official is able to identify or describe.

(3) *Confidential.* Confidential is applied to information, the unauthorized disclosure of which could reasonably be expected to cause undue risk to the common defense and security that the appropriate official is able to identify or describe.
#### In re HUNT’S ESTATE.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

November 18, 1914.)

In the matter of the estate of Charlotte L. Hunt, deceased.

No opinen. Motion granted to amend order of affirmance entered October 21, 1914, *so*as to award a bill of costs to each of the successful parties appearing on this appeal by separate attorneys, and one 'bill of costs to C. Stuart Myers, an infant, all payable out of the estate. See, also, 82 Misc. Rep. 211, 143 N. Y. Supp. 997.
52.232-24 Prohibition of Assignment of

Claims.

As prescribed in 32.806(b), insert the following clause:

Prohibition of Assignment of Claims (May 2014)

The assignment of claims under the Assignment of Claims Act of 1940 "(31 U.S.C.3727, 41

U.S.C.6305)" is prohibited for this contract.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.232 [Reserved]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

CAMELLIA THERAPEUTIC FOSTER )

AGENCY, LLC, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv735-MHT

)

ALABAMA DEPT. OF HUMAN )

HUMAN, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

This case was originally filed pro se in the Circuit Court of Montgomery County,

Alabama on June 27, 2006. On August 15, 2006, the defendants removed the case to this

court on the basis of federal question jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1446. On September 5,

2006, attorney Dwayne Brown entered an appearance for the plaintiff limited liability

corporation. See Doc. # 5. On September 26, 2006, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint

naming the Camellia Therapeutic Foster Agency, LLC, as the sole plaintiff and the Alabama

Department of Human Resources as the lone defendant. (Doc. # 13).

On February 1, 2007, counsel for the plaintiff corporation filed a motion to withdraw.

(Doc. # 20). On February 6, 2007, the court granted attorney Brown’s motion to withdraw.

(Doc. # 21). Consequently, the plaintiff limited liability corporation is no longer represented

by counsel. The corporation cannot represent itself. The chairperson of the limited liability

corporation, Joseph Appiah, does not appear to be a lawyer and, as a non-lawyer, cannot

Case 2:06-cv-00735-MHT-CSC Document 27 Filed 02/23/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

represent the corporation. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that, on or before March 12, 2007, the plaintiff shall secure representation

by a licensed attorney authorized to practice in this court. Counsel shall file a notice of

appearance on or before March 12, 2007. 

Done this 23rd day of February, 2007.

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00735-MHT-CSC Document 27 Filed 02/23/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### § 986.1 Accumulator.

*Accumulator* means a person who compiles inshell pecans from other persons for the purpose of resale or transfer.
#### Harry Mitchell, Respondent, v. Leland Badler et al., Appellants.

Order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered November 15, 1968, affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. (See *Koroleski*v. *Badler,*32 A D 2d 810.) Beldock, P. J., Brennan, Benjamin, Mun-der and Martuscello, JJ., concur.