alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 2 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 1 of 11
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 2 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 2 of 11
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 2 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 3 of 11
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 2 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 4 of 11
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 2 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 5 of 11
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 2 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 6 of 11
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 2 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 7 of 11
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 2 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 8 of 11
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 2 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 9 of 11
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 2 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 10 of 11
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 2 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 11 of 11
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 2-2 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 1 of 30
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 2-2 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 2 of 30
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 2-2 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 3 of 30
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 2-2 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 4 of 30
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 2-2 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 5 of 30
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 2-2 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 6 of 30
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 2-2 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 7 of 30
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 2-2 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 8 of 30
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 2-2 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 9 of 30
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 2-2 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 10 of 30
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 2-2 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 11 of 30
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 2-2 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 12 of 30
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 2-2 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 13 of 30
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 2-2 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 14 of 30
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 2-2 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 15 of 30
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 2-2 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 16 of 30
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 2-2 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 17 of 30
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 2-2 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 18 of 30
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 2-2 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 19 of 30
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 2-2 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 20 of 30
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 2-2 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 21 of 30
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 2-2 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 22 of 30
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 2-2 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 23 of 30
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 2-2 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 24 of 30
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 2-2 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 25 of 30
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 2-2 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 26 of 30
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 2-2 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 27 of 30
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 2-2 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 28 of 30
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 2-2 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 29 of 30
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 2-2 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 30 of 30
#### Stuart G. Ballin, Appellant, v. Margaret S. Ballin, Respondent.

Order entered on July 28, 1969, unanimously affirmed, with $30 costs and disbursements to the respondent, without prejudice to the making of an application by respondent’s attorney on proper affidavits at Special Term for an allowance of a counsel fee for defending this appeal. All of the essential and operas tive facts concerning the principal controversy pertaining to the custody of the infant daughter of the parties were before this court on the prior appeal disposed of by the order of this court entered October 31, 1968 (30 A D 2d 961). The *530basic facts in support of plaintiff’s present application (the pendency of which this court was apprised by the parties at the time of the prior appeal) are identical to those before this court on the prior appeal, without any demonstration of changes in circumstances warranting the modification of the previous order of this court. Timely and orderly administration of the law requires the rejection of a duplicative application to the Supreme Court with the same objective in respect of the custody of an infant in the absence of an affirmative showing of a change in circumstances relating to that infant since the prior order of this court. (See *Matter of Brock,*245 App. Div. 5.) We regard this appeal as superfluous. Concur—Capozzoli, J. P., McGivern, Markewich and Tilzer, JJ.
Exhibit 35.1


                                                       IMPAC FUNDING CORPORATION
                                        19500 JAMBOREE ROAD | IRVINE, CA | 92612
                                         WWW.IMPACCOMPANIES.COM | 1-800-597-4101

                    ITEM 1123 ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

                            Impac Funding Corporation

                        Impac Secured Assets Corp, 2006-3

            I, Mario Fegan, a duly authorized officer of Impac Funding
      Corporation, as master servicer (the "Master Servicer") pursuant to the
      Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement"), hereby certify that:

            1. A review of the Master Servicer's activities during the period
      from and including January 1, 2006 through and including December 31, 2006
      (the "Reporting Period") and of the Master Servicer's performance under
      the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

            2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master
      Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all
      material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this
      Certificate this 20th day of March 2007.


[LOGO] IMPAC(R)

                                                  By: /s/ Mario Fegan
                                                      --------------------------
                                                  Name: Mario Fegan
                                                  Title: V.P., Master Servicing
SUBCHAPTER A - GENERAL

PART 2801 - DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ACQUISITION REGULATION SYSTEM

PART 2802 - DEFINITIONS OF WORDS AND TERMS

PART 2803 - IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF

INTEREST

PART 2804 - ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS

PART 2801 - DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ACQUISITION REGULATION SYSTEM

Subpart 2801.1 - Purpose, Authority, Issuance

2801.101 Purpose.

2801.105 Issuance.

2801.105-2 Arrangement of regulation.

2801.106 OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act.

Subpart 2801.3 - Agency Acquisition Regulations

2801.304 Agency control and compliance procedures.

Subpart 2801.4 - Deviations From the FAR and JAR

2801.403 Individual deviations.

2801.404 Class deviations.

2801.404-70 Requests for class deviations.

Subpart 2801.6 - Career Development, Contracting Authority, and Responsibilities

2801.601 General.

2801.604 Contracting Officer's Representative (COR).

PART 2802 - DEFINITIONS OF WORDS AND TERMS

Subpart 2802.1 - Definitions

2802.101 Definitions.

PART 2803 - IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Subpart 2803.1 - Safeguards

2803.101 Standards of conduct.

2803.101-3 Agency regulations.

2803.104 Procurement integrity.

2803.104-7 Violations or possible violations.

Subpart 2803.2 - Contractor Gratuities to Government Personnel

2803.203 Reporting suspected violations of the Gratuities clause.

2803.204 Treatment of violations.

Subpart 2803.3 - Reports of Suspected Antitrust Violations

2803.301 General.

Subpart 2803.4 - Contingent Fees

2803.405 Misrepresentations or violations of the Covenant Against Contingent

Fees.

Subpart 2803.8 - Limitations on the Payment of Funds to Influence Federal Transactions

2803.806 Processing suspected violations.

Subpart 2803.9 - Whistleblower Protections for Contractor Employees

2803.901 Definitions.

2803.905 Procedures for investigating complaints.

2803.906 Remedies.

2803.908 Enhancement of contractor employee whistleblower protections.

2803.908-9 Contract clauses.

2803.908-70 Whistleblower Protection in General Non-Disclosure Agreement.
2803.908-71 Whistleblower Protection in Intelligence-Related Non-Disclosure

Agreement.

Subpart 2803.10 - Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct

2803.1004 Contract clauses.

PART 2804 - ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS

Subpart 2804.4 - Safeguarding Classified Information Within Industry

2804.402 General.

2804.402-70 Contractor personnel security program.

Subpart 2804.9 - Taxpayer Identification Number Information

2804.901 Definitions.

2804.903 Reporting contract information to IRS.

2804.903-70 Reporting contract information.

2804.903-71 Special reporting exceptions.
#### § 993.87 Duration of immunities.

The benefits, privileges, and immunities conferred upon any person by virtue of this subpart shall cease upon the termination of this subpart, except with respect to acts done under and during the existence of this subpart.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6241

ANTONIO BURTS, Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. SULLIVAN’S BODY SHOP, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (6:06-cv-02500-HMH) Submitted: May 30, 2008 Decided: June 10, 2008 Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Antonio Burts, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.* To the extent that Burts’ notice of appeal could be construed as pertaining to the district court’s September 10, 2007 order finding several of Burts’ post-judgment motions to be moot, we note that the notice of appeal also is untimely as to that order. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Antonio Burts seeks to file an appeal in his action against Sullivan’s Body Shop. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr. , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court’s final order was entered on the docket on October 23, 2006. The notice of appeal was filed more than a year later. Because Burts failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. *We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 35.3

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

American Express Centurion Bank

American Express Issuance Trust II

Reporting Period January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016

The undersigned, a duly
authorized officer of American Express Centurion Bank (AECB), a wholly-owned subsidiary of American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. (TRS), pursuant to the Amended and Restated Supplemental Servicing Agreement,
dated as of March 12, 2013, among TRS, AECB, American Express Bank, FSB, and American Express Receivables Financing Corporation VIII LLC (as amended from time to time, the Agreement), does hereby certify
that:

1. AECB performs certain servicing procedures on behalf of TRS under the Agreement.

2. The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Certificate.

3. A review of AECBs activities during the reporting period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

4. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, AECB has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this
9thday of March, 2017.



|                                |  |                                         
|------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|AMERICAN EXPRESS CENTURION BANK
|                                | 
|By:                             |  | /s/ Denise D. Roberts                   
|Name:                           |  | Denise D. Roberts                       
|Title:                          |  | Chief Financial Officer                 
|                                | 
|By:                             |  | /s/ Brady P. Bagley                     
|Name:                           |  | Brady P. Bagley                         
|Title:                          |  | Vice President  Controller, U S Banking
# Subpart 2837.1 - Service Contracts - General

**Parent topic:**PART 2837 - SERVICE CONTRACTING

## 2837.106 Funding and term of service contracts.

The HCA or designee is the agency head for purposes of FAR 37.106(b).
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 36 Filed 03/20/2007 Page 1 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 36 Filed 03/20/2007 Page 2 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 36 Filed 03/20/2007 Page 3 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 36 Filed 03/20/2007 Page 4 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 36 Filed 03/20/2007 Page 5 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 36 Filed 03/20/2007 Page 6 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 36 Filed 03/20/2007 Page 7 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 36 Filed 03/20/2007 Page 8 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 36 Filed 03/20/2007 Page 9 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 36 Filed 03/20/2007 Page 10 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 36 Filed 03/20/2007 Page 11 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 36 Filed 03/20/2007 Page 12 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 36 Filed 03/20/2007 Page 13 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 36 Filed 03/20/2007 Page 14 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 36 Filed 03/20/2007 Page 15 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 36 Filed 03/20/2007 Page 16 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 36 Filed 03/20/2007 Page 17 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 36 Filed 03/20/2007 Page 18 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 36 Filed 03/20/2007 Page 19 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 36 Filed 03/20/2007 Page 20 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 36 Filed 03/20/2007 Page 21 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 36 Filed 03/20/2007 Page 22 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 36 Filed 03/20/2007 Page 23 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 36 Filed 03/20/2007 Page 24 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 36-2 Filed 03/20/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 36-2 Filed 03/20/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 36-3 Filed 03/20/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 36-3 Filed 03/20/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 36-4 Filed 03/20/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 36-4 Filed 03/20/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 36-5 Filed 03/20/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 36-6 Filed 03/20/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 36-7 Filed 03/20/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 36-8 Filed 03/20/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 36-8 Filed 03/20/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 36-9 Filed 03/20/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 36-9 Filed 03/20/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 36-9 Filed 03/20/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 36-9 Filed 03/20/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 36-9 Filed 03/20/2007 Page 5 of 5
223 So.2d 409

#### Mrs. Cynthia Sue MARY, wife of Thomas Mattingly PUISSEGUR v. Thomas Mattingly PUISSEGUR.

No. 49849.

June 13, 1969.

In re: Thomas Mattingly Puissegur applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 220 So.2d 547.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.
Exhibit 35.5



LOGO

1123 Servicer Compliance Statement

Transactions Listed With SEC

I, Michael
C. Koster, Executive Vice President of EverBank, certify that:



| | (a) | A review of EverBank (the Servicer) activities during the period ending December 31, 2015, (Reporting Period) and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement as identified on
Schedule A has been made under my supervision.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

February 29, 2016



|       |  |                         
|------ |  | ------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Michael C. Koster   
|Name:  |  | Michael C. Koster       
|Title: |  | Executive Vice President



---

Schedule A

Transactions Listed with the SEC 2015

Deals in full compliance



|                  |  |                               |  |                                                                                                                                                   
|----------------- |  | ----------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Security or Deal  |  | Full Deal Name                |  | Master Servicer of Trustee or Investor                                                                                                            
|SEMT Trust 2013-1 |  | Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2013-1 |  | Master Servicer - Wells Fargo Bank
Trustee - Christina Trust
Securities Administrator - Citibank
Depositor - Redwood Residential Acquisition
Corp.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Greene County Bancshares,
      Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the
“Report”), I, James E. Adams, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
      Assistant Secretary of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The information contained in the Report
              fairly
              presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
              of
              operations of the Company.






/s/ James
      E.
      Adams


James
      E.
      Adams


Senior
      Vice
      President, Chief Financial


Officer
      and Assistant
      Secretary





Date:
      May
      9, 2007
1.9002 Contract document approval

signature routing procedures.

Procedures are located in DARS PGI 1.9002.

Parent topic: SUBPART 1.90 — PROCUREMENT OVERSIGHT
5216.506 Solicitation provisions and contract

clauses.

(j) The Navy task and delivery order ombudsman is Ms. Cindy Shaver, Deputy Assistant Secretary of

the Navy (Procurement), 1000 Navy Pentagon, Washington, DC 20350, phone (703) 614-9600, fax

(703) 614-9394, and email NCAG@navy.mil.

Parent topic: Subpart 5216.5 - INDEFINITE-DELIVERY CONTRACTS
PUBLIC LAW 107–265—OCT. 30, 2002 116 STAT. 1749

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3739:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 148 (2002):

June 11, considered and passed House.

Oct. 17, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 107–265

107th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 6150 North

Broad Street in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Rev. Leon Sullivan Post

Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

6150 North Broad Street in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, shall be

known and designated as the ‘‘Rev. Leon Sullivan Post Office

Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Rev. Leon

Sullivan Post Office Building’’.

Approved October 30, 2002.

Oct. 30, 2002

[H.R. 3739]
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 2.1012 Compliance. ( a ) If the Department of Energy fails to make its initial certification at least six months prior to tendering the application, upon receipt of the tendered application, notwithstanding the provisions of § 2.101(f)(3), the Director of the NRC's Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards will not docket the application until at least six months have elapsed from the time of the certification. The Director may determine that the tendered application is not acceptable for docketing under this subpart if the application is not accompanied by an updated certification pursuant to § 2.1009(b), or if the Secretary of the Commission determines that the application is not submitted on optical storage media in a format consistent with NRC regulations and guidance, or for non-compliance with any other requirements identified in this subpart.
( b ) ( 1 ) A person, including a potential party given access to the Licensing Support Network under this subpart, may not be granted party status under § 2.309, or status as an interested governmental participant under § 2.315, if it cannot demonstrate substantial and timely compliance with the requirements of § 2.1003 at the time it requests participation in the HLW licensing proceeding under § 2.309 or § 2.315.
( 2 ) A person denied party status or interested governmental participant status under paragraph (b)(1) of this section may request party status or interested governmental participant status upon a showing of subsequent compliance with the requirements of § 2.1003. Admission of such a party or interested governmental participant under §§ 2.309 or 2.315, respectively, is conditioned on accepting the status of the proceeding at the time of admission.
( c ) The Presiding Officer shall not make a finding of substantial and timely compliance pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section for any person who is not in compliance with all applicable orders of the Pre-License Application Presiding Officer designated pursuant to § 2.1010.
[54 FR 14944, Apr. 14, 1989, as amended at 56 FR 7796, Feb. 26, 1991; 63 FR 71739, Dec. 30, 1998; 66 FR 29466, May 31, 2001; 69 FR 2265, Jan. 14, 2004; 69 FR 32848, June 14, 2004]