alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from National
Property Investors 8 1997 Third Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000763701
<NAME> NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS 8
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,588
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       41
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          29,973
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,790
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,937
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         10,939
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,096
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,937
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,568
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,575
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 739
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (7)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (7)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (7)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.16)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>     DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>          SEP-30-1996

<CASH>                        8,359,856 
<SECURITIES>                       0    
<RECEIVABLES>                   505,800 
<ALLOWANCES>                       0    
<INVENTORY>                        0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              8,865,656 
<PP&E>                       10,411,449 
<DEPRECIATION>                  983,909 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               51,772,538 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           380,888 
<BONDS>                            0    
<COMMON>                           0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0    
<PREFERRED>                        0    
<OTHER-SE>                   47,650,312 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 51,772,538 
<SALES>                       2,202,259 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              4,703,685 
<CGS>                              0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   999,141 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                510,107 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 0    
<INCOME-PRETAX>               3,194,437 
<INCOME-TAX>                       0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           2,605,566 
<DISCONTINUED>                1,619,622 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0    
<CHANGES>                          0    
<NET-INCOME>                  4,225,188 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                     61.21 
<EPS-DILUTED>                     61.21 

        

</TABLE>
# Subpart 816.1 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**PART 816 - TYPES OF CONTRACTS
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Viking Minerals Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K/A for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles Irizarry,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
6th day of August, 2010.


/s/ Charles Irizarry
---------------------------
Charles Irizarry
Chief Executive Officer
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 11

- 171 V

Filed: October 23, 2014

Not for P ublication

*************************************

KAMALI SAMINATHAN

, *

*

Petitioner

, * Attorneys’ fees and costs decision b ased on

* s tipulation of f

act

v. *

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

*

*************************************

Jay A. Bansal

, Tempe, AZ

, for petitioner.

Glenn A. MacLeod , Washington, DC, for respondent.

MILLMAN, Special Master

DECISION AWARDING ATTORNEYS ’ FEES AND COSTS 1

On October 23 , 2014 , the parties filed a stipulation of fact in which they agreed on an

appropriate amount for attorneys’ fees and costs in this case

.

I n accordance with t he General Order #9 r equiremen t, petitioner assert s that s he did not

incur any co sts in pursuit of her petition. Petitioner submitted her request for attorneys’ fees and

costs to respondent. During informal discussions, respondent ra ised objections t o certain items in

petitioner’ s application

. Based on these objections, petitioner a mend s her application for

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation f or the special master’ s action in this

case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal

Claims’ s website, in accordance with the E

- Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107

- 347, 116 Stat. 2899,

2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special master s will be made

available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is

privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly

unwarranted invasion of priva cy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and

move to redact such information prior to the document = s disclosure. If the special master, upon review,

agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall

redact such material from public access.2

attor ne ys’ fees and costs to $1 05 ,6 5 6.2 1

. Respondent does not object to this amount. The

undersigned finds this amount to be reasonable. Accordingly, the court awards $ 1 05 ,6 5 6.2 1

, representing reimbursement for attorneys’ fees and costs. The award shall be in the form of a

chec k payable jointly to petitioner and t he Law Of fice s of Jay A. Bansal in the amount of

$ 1 05 ,6 5 6.2 1

.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the

court is dire cted to enter judgment herewith. 2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 23, 2014 s/ Laura D. Millman

Laura D. Millman

Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party , either separately or

jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
----

**Citizens      Financial Corp.**

**Certification      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley **

**Act      of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

| 1. | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the company for the quarterly period                ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission                on the date hereof (the “report”) fully complies with the requirements of                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | 5/9/07 |   | /s/Thomas                K. Derbyshire                               |   |
|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |   | Thomas                K. Derbyshire                                  |   |
|   |   |   | Vice                President, Treasurer Principal Financial Officer |   |

----
Case 2:06-cv-00746-WHA Document 16 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 1 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00746-WHA Document 16 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 2 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00746-WHA Document 16 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 3 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00746-WHA Document 16 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 4 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00746-WHA Document 16 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 5 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00746-WHA Document 16 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 6 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00746-WHA Document 16 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 7 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00746-WHA Document 16 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 8 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00746-WHA Document 16 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 9 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00746-WHA Document 16 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 10 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00746-WHA Document 16 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 11 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00746-WHA Document 16 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 12 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00746-WHA Document 16 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 13 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00746-WHA Document 16 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 14 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00746-WHA Document 16 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 15 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00746-WHA Document 16 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 16 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00746-WHA Document 16 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 17 of 17
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 2.627 Partial decision on site suitability issues in combined license proceeding. ( a ) The provisions of §§ 2.331, 2.339, 2.340(b), 2.343, 2.712, and 2.713 shall apply to any partial initial decision rendered in accordance with this subpart. Section 2.340(c) shall not apply to any partial initial decision rendered in accordance with this subpart. A limited work authorization may not be issued under 10 CFR 50.10(e) and no construction permit may be issued without completion of the full review required by Section 102(2) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended, and subpart A of part 51 of this chapter. The authority of the Commission to review such a partial initial decision sua sponte, or to raise sua sponte an issue that has not been raised by the parties, will be exercised within the same time period as in the case of a full decision relating to the issuance of a construction permit.
( b ) ( 1 ) A partial decision on one or more site suitability issues pursuant to the applicable provisions of part 50, subpart A of part 51, and part 100 of this chapter issued in accordance with this subpart shall: ( i ) Clearly identify the site to which the partial decision applies; and
( ii ) Indicate to what extent additional information may be needed and additional review may be required to enable the Commission to determine in accordance with the provisions of the Act and the applicable provisions of the regulations in this chapter whether a construction permit for a facility to be located on the site identified in the partial decision should be issued or denied.
( 2 ) Following either the Commission (acting in the function of a presiding officer) issuance of a partial initial decision, or completion of Commission review of the partial initial decision of the presiding officer, after hearing, on the site suitability issues, the partial decision shall remain in effect either for a period of 5 years or, where the applicant for the combined license has made timely submittal of the information required to support the application as provided in § 2.101(a-2), until the proceeding for a combined license on the site identified in the partial decision has been concluded, unless the Commission or presiding officer, upon its own initiative or upon motion by a party to the proceeding, finds that there exists significant new information that substantially affects the earlier conclusions and reopens the hearing record on site suitability issues. Upon good cause shown, the Commission may extend the 5-year period during which a partial decision shall remain in effect for a reasonable period of time not to exceed 1 year.
# Subparts 817.1 - 817.4 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**PART 817 - SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS
#### § 993.48 Regulation.

No handler shall handle prunes except in accordance with the provisions of this part.

[30 FR 9799, Aug. 6, 1965]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA OF

NORTHERN DIVISION

MAY'S DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, )

INC., individually and as class )

representative of all those gasoline )

station owners similarly situated, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-702-MEF

)

TOTAL CONTAINMENT, INC., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File

Response/Reply to Plaintiff's Fourth Amended Complaint (Doc. #45) filed on September

21, 2006, it is hereby

ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED.

DONE this the 25th day of September, 2006.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 48 Filed 09/25/2006 Page 1 of 1
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

J.B., a minor child, by and )

through his next friend, )

Addie Ward, on behalf of )

himself and all others )

similarly situated, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv755-MHT

) 

WALTER WOOD, in his )

individual capacity, )

)

Defendant. )

J.B., a minor child, by and )

through his next friend, )

Addie Ward, on behalf of )

himself and all others )

similarly situated, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv908-MHT

) 

WALTER WOOD, in his )

individual capacity, )

)

Defendant. )

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 53 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 1 of 2
ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion for leave to file under

seal (Doc. No. 50) is granted.

DONE, this the 30th day of July, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 53 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### § 986.68 Authority for research and promotion activities.

The Council, with the approval of the Secretary, may establish or provide for the establishment of production research, marketing research and development projects, and marketing promotion, including paid generic advertising, designed to assist, improve, or promote the marketing, distribution, and consumption or efficient production of pecans including product development, nutritional research, and container development. The expenses of such projects shall be paid from funds collected pursuant to this part.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

In the Matter of the Extradition of )

)

MARIA del ROSARIO MORENO-VAZQUES ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06cv761-MEF

a/k/a MARIA COONLEY )

ORDER

Now pending before court is the United States’ motion to release documents (doc. #

27). The documents have been made available to the United States. Accordingly, upon

consideration of the motion, and for good cause, it is

ORDERED that the motion be and is hereby DENIED as moot.

Done this 6th day of June, 2008.

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00761-CSC Document 30 Filed 06/06/2008 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cr-210-MEF

)

MELISSA WARD )

O R D E R

It is hereby ORDERED that the sentencing hearing set in this case for March 28, 2007

is continued to March 30, 2007 at 10:00 A.M. at the United States Courthouse, One Church

Street, Courtroom 2A, Montgomery, Alabama.

DONE this 23rd of March, 2007. 

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cr-00210-MEF-CSC Document 27 Filed 03/23/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### § 993.55 Application of salable and reserve percentages after end of crop year.

The salable and reserve percentages established for any crop year shall remain in effect after that crop year until salable and reserve percentages are established for another crop year. After such percentages are established, all reserve obligations shall be adjusted to the newly established percentages.

[46 FR 61637, Dec. 18, 1981]
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Integra Bank Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each
of the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Michael T. Vea
-------------------------------------
Chairman of the Board, Chief
Executive Officer, and
President
November 8, 2006


/s/ Martin M. Zorn
-------------------------------------
Executive Vice President, and
Chief Financial Officer
November 8, 2006
**Exhibit 35.1**

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENTCAPITAL ONE PRIME AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 2006-2**

 

Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust 2006-2

Capital One Auto Finance, Inc.

c/o 1680 Capital One Drive

McLean,Virginia 22102

 

In connection with theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust 2006-2 for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006 (the “Report”),the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Capital One Auto Finance, Inc.(the “Servicer”), does hereby certify and represent that:

1.               A review of the activities and performance ofthe Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 12,2006, by and between Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust 2006-2, asIssuer, Capital One Auto Receivables, LLC, as Seller, The Bank of New York, asIndenture Trustee, and the Servicer (the “Agreement”) during the period that isthe subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.

2.            To the best of my knowledge, based on suchreview, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreementin all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of theReport.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has duly executed this Servicer Compliance Statement this 28th day of March, 2007

 

CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE,INC.
| By:                                        |   | /s/ David R. Lawson |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------|--------|
| Name: David R. Lawson                      |   |
| Title:   Chief Executive Officer |   |

** **

----
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 3:06-CR-204-MEF

) 

HENRY ERIK YAPIAS )

)

United States’s Motion for Reduction of Offense

Level for Acceptance of Responsibility

The United States moves this Court to reduce Henry Erik Yapias’s offense level by

one-level based on Yapias’s acceptance of responsibility. As grounds for this Motion, the

United States notes:

1. On or about October 12, 2006–approximately one month and two weeks prior

to trial–Yapias’s counsel indicated that Yapias wanted to cooperate with the Government and

to plead guilty to the charges in this case. 

2. This was sufficiently early to permit the Government to avoid preparing for

trial and to allocate its resources efficiently. 

3. Therefore, under United States Sentencing Guidelines § 3E1.1(b), the United

States makes this formal request for a one-level reduction in Yapias’s offense level for

acceptance of responsibility so that he shall receive a total reduction for acceptance of

responsibility of three-levels.

Respectfully submitted this the 11th day of September, 2007.

Case 3:06-cr-00204-MEF-CSC Document 45 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 1 of 2
-2-

LEURA G. CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/ Christopher Snyder 

CHRISTOPHER A. SNYDER

Assistant United States Attorney

131 Clayton Street

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334) 223-7280

Fax: (334) 223-7135

E-mail: christopher.a.snyder@usdoj.gov 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on September 11, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of

such filing to all attorneys of record.

/s/ Christopher Snyder 

CHRISTOPHER A. SNYDER

Assistant United States Attorney

Case 3:06-cr-00204-MEF-CSC Document 45 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 2 of 2