alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 15.2 Definitions.

*Administrative offset* means withholding money payable by the United States Government to, or held by the Government for, a person to satisfy a debt the person owes the United States Government.

*Administrative wage garnishment* is the process of withholding amounts from an employee's disposable pay and the paying of those amounts to a creditor in satisfaction of a withholding order.

*Claim* and *debt* are used synonymously to refer to an amount of money, funds, or property that has been determined by an agency official to be owed to the United States from any person, organization, or entity, except another Federal agency. For the purposes of administrative offset under 31 U.S.C. 3716, the terms *claim* and *debt* include an amount of money, funds, or property owed by a person to a State (including past-due support being enforced by a State), the District of Columbia, American Samoa, Guam, the United States Virgin Islands, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

*Cross-servicing* means that the Treasury or another debt collection center is taking appropriate debt collection action on behalf of one or more Federal agencies or a unit or subagency thereof.

*Delinquent.* A debt is considered delinquent if it has not been paid by the date specified in the initial written demand for payment or applicable contractual agreement with the NRC unless other satisfactory payment arrangements have been made by that date. If the debtor fails to satisfy obligations under a payment agreement with the NRC after other payment arrangements have been made, the debt becomes a delinquent debt.

*Federal agencies* include agencies of the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of the Government, including Government corporations.

*License* means any license, permit, or other approval issued by the Commission.

*Payment in full* means payment of the total debt due the United States, including any interest, penalty, and administrative costs of collection assessed against the debtor.

*Recoupment* is a special method for adjusting debts arising under the same transaction or occurrence. For example, obligations arising under the same contract generally are subject to recoupment.

*Salary offset* means an administrative offset to collect a debt under 5 U.S.C. 5514 by deduction(s) at one or more officially established pay intervals from the current pay account of an employee without his/her consent.

*Tax refund offset* means withholding or reducing a tax refund payment by an amount necessary to satisfy a debt owed by the payee(s) of a tax refund payment.

*Treasury* as used in 10 CFR part 15 means the Department of the Treasury.

*Withholding order* means any order for withholding or garnishment of pay issued by an agency, or judicial or administrative body.

[55 FR 32377, Aug. 9, 1990, as amended at 56 FR 51830, Oct. 16, 1991; 67 FR 30318, May 6, 2002]
#### § 993.105 Size count.

*Size count* means the count or number of prunes per pound.

[26 FR 8278, Sept. 2, 1961. Redesignated at 35 FR 11380, July 16, 1970, and further redesignated at 37 FR 15980, Aug. 9, 1972]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) CR. NO. 3:06cr204-MEF

)

HENRY ERIK YAPIAS )

ORDER

Pursuant to the defendant’s Notice of Intent to Change Plea (Doc. #23) filed on

November 29, 2006, it is hereby

ORDERED that the defendant’s change of plea hearing be and is hereby set for

December 1, 2006, at 9:30 a.m., in Courtroom 4B, United States Courthouse Complex,

One Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a court reporter for this proceeding. If the defendant

is in custody, the United States Marshal or the person having custody of the defendant shall

produce the defendant for the proceeding.

Done this 29 day of November, 2006. th

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cr-00204-MEF-CSC Document 24 Filed 11/29/2006 Page 1 of 1
§ 170.5 Communications. All communications concerning the regulations in this part should be addressed to the NRC's Chief Financial Officer, either by mail to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; by hand delivery to the NRC's offices at 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland; or, where practicable, by electronic submission, for example, via Electronic Information Exchange, or CD-ROM. Electronic submissions must be made in a manner that enables the NRC to receive, read, authenticate, distribute, and archive the submission, and process and retrieve it a single page at a time. Detailed guidance on making electronic submissions can be obtained by visiting the NRC's Web site at *http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html ;* by e-mail to *MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov ;* or by writing the Office of the Chief Information Officer, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. The guidance discusses, among other topics, the formats the NRC can accept, the use of electronic signatures, and the treatment of nonpublic information. [68 FR 58825, Oct. 10, 2003, as amended at 74 FR 62686, Dec. 1, 2009; 80 FR 74982, Dec. 1, 2015]
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 33 (Friday, February 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 7441]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3168]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Hearing on the Department of Justice's Actions Related to the New 
Black Panther Party Litigation and Its Enforcement of Section 11(b) of 
the Voting Rights Act

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Date and Time: Friday, March 19, 2010; 9:30 a.m. EST.
    Place: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 624 Ninth Street, NW., Room 
540, Washington, DC 20425.
    Summary: Notice is hereby given pursuant to the provisions of the 
Civil Rights Commission Amendments Act of 1994, 42 U.S.C. 1975a, and 45 
CFR 702.3., that public hearings before the U.S. Commission on Civil 
Rights will commence on Friday, March 19, 2010, beginning at 9:30 a.m. 
EST in Washington, DC at the Commission's offices located at 624 Ninth 
Street, NW., Room 540, Washington, DC 20425. An executive session not 
open to the public may be convened at any appropriate time before or 
during the hearing.
    The purpose of this hearing is to collect information within the 
jurisdiction of the Commission, under 42 U.S.C. 1975a, related 
particularly to the Department of Justice's actions in the New Black 
Panther Party Litigation and enforcement of Section 11(b) of the Voting 
Rights Act.
    The Commission is authorized to hold hearings and to issue 
subpoenas for the production of documents and the attendance of 
witnesses pursuant to 45 CFR 701.2. The Commission is an independent 
bipartisan, fact finding agency authorized to study, collect, and 
disseminate information, and to appraise the laws and policies of the 
Federal Government, and to study and collect information with respect 
to discrimination or denials of equal protection of the laws under the 
Constitution because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or 
national origin, or in the administration of justice. The Commission 
has broad authority to investigate allegations of voting irregularities 
even when alleged abuses do not involve discrimination.
    Contact Person for Further Information: Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting 
Chief, Public Affairs Unit (202) 376-8591. TDD: (202) 376-8116.
    Persons with a disability requiring special services, such as an 
interpreter for the hearing impaired, should contact Pamela Dunston at 
least seven days prior to the scheduled date of the hearing at 202-376-
8105. TDD: (202) 376-8116.

    Dated: February 12, 2010.
David Blackwood,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010-3168 Filed 2-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
H. Res. 1096

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 7, 2006.

Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule 

XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to the House 

is waived with respect to any resolution reported on the legislative day of December 7, 2006. 

SEC. 2. It shall be in order at any time on the legislative 

day of December 7, 2006, for the Speaker to entertain motions that the House suspend the rules. The Speaker or his 

designee shall consult with the Minority Leader or her designee on the designation of any matter for consideration pursuant to this resolution. 

SEC. 3. House Resolutions 810, 939, 951, and 1047 are 

laid upon the table. 

Attest:

Clerk.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

 v. )

)

HENRY ERIK YAPIAS ) CR. NO. 3:06CR204-MEF

O R D E R

The defendant by consent has appeared before a United States Magistrate Judge and has entered

a plea of guilty. The Magistrate Judge has accepted the plea of guilty and has adjudicated the defendant

guilty. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. That sentencing of the defendant be, and the same is, hereby set on February 15, 2007, at 9:00

a.m. in the Frank M.Johnson,Jr. United States Courthouse Complex, One Church Street, Montgomery,

Alabama.

2. That in accordance with Rule 32(f)(1), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, on or before

January 25, 2007, counsel for the defendant and the Government shall communicate in writing to the

probation officer, and to each other, any objections they have as to any material information, sentencing

classifications, sentencing guideline ranges, and policy statements contained in or omitted from the

presentence report.

3. That, unless excused in writing by the Chief U.S. Probation Officer of this district, counsel

for the parties shall be available for a conference with the probation officer on January 26, 2007, at 10:00

a.m., to discuss and resolve, if possible, factual and legal issues contained in the presentence report. If

the probation officer determines or if any of the parties request that a personal meeting be held to resolve

the issues, such meeting shall be at the U.S. Probation Office, One Church Street, Montgomery, AL,

on the above date and time. Such request for a personal conference shall be made to the probation officer

within five (5) calendar days after receipt of the presentence report. Otherwise, the conference shall be

held telephonically. Any motion for downward departure shall be filed on or before the conference date

with the probation officer, unless based on unknown and unforseen circumstances arising after that date,

in which case the motion must be filed promptly upon discovery of such circumstances.

Nothing contained in this Order shall be construed as impairing the rights of any party as

established in the Constitution or laws of the United States.

DONE this the 12 day of December, 2006. th

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cr-00204-MEF-CSC Document 29 Filed 12/12/2006 Page 1 of 1
SUBPART 37.1 –– SERVICE

CONTRACTS––GENERAL

Parent topic: PART 37 –– SERVICE CONTRACTING

237.104 Personal services contracts.

(b)(i) The approval authority is the HCA. Legal counsel, CoCO, and HCO coordination is required.

237.170 Approval of contracts and task orders for services.

237.170-2 Approval requirements

(a) Acquisition of services through a contract or task order that is not performance based.

(1) For acquisitions at or below $50 million, obtain the review and approval of the CoCO.

(2) For acquisitions over $50 million up to $100 million, obtain the review and approval of the HCO.

(3) For acquisitions exceeding $100 million, obtain the review and approval of the Senior

Procurement Executive (SPE).

(S-90) For each acquisition that is non-performance based, the contracting officer shall prepare a

D&F for approval in accordance with paragraph 237.170-2(a). The D&F must be approved prior to

release of the solicitation.

(S-91) The review and approval thresholds are based upon the total estimated cost of the acquisition.

(S-92) Technical and requirements personnel are responsible for providing accurate and complete

data to the contracting officer to support their recommendation for other than a performance based

acquisition.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3357 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Acetoacetyl-2,5-Dimethoxy-4- 

Chloroanilide. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 5, 2006 

Mr. KENNEDY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Acetoacetyl-2,5- 

Dimethoxy-4-Chloroanilide. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ACETOACETYL-2,5-DIMETHOXY-4- 

4 CHLOROANILIDE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.31.22 Acetoacetyl-2,5-Dimethoxy-4- 

Chloroanilide (CAS No. 4433–79–8) 

(provided for in subheading 2924.29.76) Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 3357 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
§ 1047.7 Use of deadly force. ( a ) Deadly force means that force which a reasonable person would consider likely to cause death or serious bodily harm. Its use may be justified only under conditions of extreme necessity, when all lesser means have failed or cannot reasonably be employed. A protective force officer is authorized to use deadly force only when one or more of the following circumstances exists: ( 1 ) *Self-Defense.* When deadly force reasonably appears to be necessary to protect a protective force officer who reasonably believes himself or herself to be in imminent danger of death or serious bodily harm.
( 2 ) *Serious offenses against persons.* When deadly force reasonably appears to be necessary to prevent the commission of a serious offense against a person(s) in circumstances presenting an imminent danger of death or serious bodily harm (e.g. sabotage of an occupied facility by explosives).
( 3 ) *Nuclear weapons or nuclear explosive devices.* When deadly force reasonably appears to be necessary to prevent the theft, sabotage, or unauthorized control of a nuclear weapon or nuclear explosive device.
( 4 ) *Special nuclear material.* When deadly force reasonably appears to be necessary to prevent the theft, sabotage, or unauthorized control of special nuclear material from an area of a fixed site or from a shipment where Category II or greater quantities are known or reasonably believed to be present.
( 5 ) *Apprehension.* When deadly force reasonably appears to be necessary to apprehend or prevent the escape of a person reasonably believed to: ( i ) have committed an offense of the nature specified in paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(4)[1] of this section; or
( ii ) be escaping by use of a weapon or explosive or who otherwise indicates that he or she poses a significant threat of death or serious bodily harm to the protective force officer or others unless apprehended without delay.
( b ) *Additional Considerations Involving Firearms.* If it becomes necessary to use a firearm, the following precautions shall be observed: ( 1 ) A warning, e.g. an order to halt, shall be given, if feasible, before a shot is fired.
( 2 ) Warning shots shall not be fired.
Footnotes -
1047.7
[1] These offenses are considered by the Department of Energy to pose a significant threat of death or serious bodily harm.
3006.9000 Applicability (USCG).

Contracts awarded by the U.S. Coast Guard using the procedures in (HSAR) 48 CFR 3037.104–91

are expressly authorized under Section 1091 of Title 10 U.S.C. as amended, for the Coast Guard and

are exempt from the competition requirements of (FAR) 48 CFR part 6.

Parent topic: Subpart 3006.90—Competition Requirements For Personal Services Contracting
February 10, 2012 

Mr. Greg Crum 

Director of Operations 

Southwest Airlines Co. 

Love Field 

P.O. Box 36611 

Dallas, TX 75235-1611 

Dear Mr. Crum: 

This is in response to your December 16, 2011 letter sent to the public docket (No. FAA2011-1390) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration on behalf of Southwest Airlines 

Co. (Southwest) for an exemption from § 121.291(d) of Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Southwest to defer the date 

by which the simulated ditching demonstration must be completed for the Boeing 737-700 

aircraft acquired as a result of the merger with AirTran Airways. 

This project is being combined with the petition submitted by Southwest on November 22, 

2011, requesting an exemption from § 121.291(b) of 14 CFR. That exemption, if granted, 

would allow Southwest to defer the date by which the demonstration of emergency 

evacuation procedures for the Boeing 717 aircraft acquired as a result of the merger with 

AirTran Airways. 

Please refer to public docket No. FAA-2011-1329 for any status updates or decision 

regarding these petitions. Docket No. FAA-2011-1390 will be closed. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Ida M. Klepper 

Manager, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division
§ 955.72 Proceedings after termination. ( a ) Upon the termination of the provisions of this subpart, the then functioning members of the committee shall continue as joint trustees, for the purpose of liquidating the affairs of the committee, of all funds and property then in the possession, or under control, of the committee, including claims for any funds unpaid or property not delivered at the time of such termination. Action by said trusteeship shall require the concurrence of a majority of the said trustees.
( b ) The said trustees shall continue in such capacity until discharged by the Secretary; shall, from time to time, account for all receipts and disbursements and deliver all property on hand, together with all books and records of said committee and of the trustees, to such person as the Secretary may direct; and shall upon the request of the Secretary, execute such assignments or other instruments necessary or appropriate to vest in such person full title and right to all of the funds, property, and claims vested in said committee or the trustees pursuant to this subpart.
( c ) Any person to whom funds, property, or claims have been transferred or delivered by the committee or its members pursuant to this section shall be subject to the same obligations imposed upon the members of the committee and upon the said trustees.
Exhibit 10.1


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1 

TO AMENDED AND RESTATED

CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENT


 


This
Amendment No. 1 (this “Amendment”),
dated as of February 5, 2010, is entered into by and between PONIARD
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., a Washington corporation (the “Company”),
and RONALD A. MARTELL (the “Executive”).


 


RECITALS


 


A.            The Company and the
Executive are parties to an Amended and Restated Change of Control Agreement,
dated as of February 24, 2009 (the “Agreement”).


 


B.            The Executive has been
promoted to Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the parties desire to
amend the Agreement to provide the Executive additional benefits.


 


AGREEMENT


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:


 


1.                                      Termination
Payments - COBRA.


 


The
phrase “one (1) year” in the first line of Section 8.1(b) shall
be changed to “eighteen (18) months”.


 


2.                                      Termination
Payments - Salary.


 


The
phrase “one (1) times” in the first line of Section 8.1(d) shall
be changed to “two (2) times”.


 


3.                                      Full
Force and Effect.


 


Except
as amended by this Amendment, the Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect in accordance with its terms.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and entered into this Amendment
effective as of the date first above written.


 


 


	
   

  	
  PONIARD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/
  Gerald McMahon

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name:
  Gerald McMahon

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Its:
  Chairman

  



 

















 


	
   

  	
  EXECUTIVE

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  Ronald
  A. Martell

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Name:
  Ronald A. Martell

  



 


2
Opinion issued July 2, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-19-00063-CV

———————————

IN RE SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF INDIANA, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana, filed a petition for a writ of 

mandamus seeking to compel the respondent district judge to rule on its two pending 

motions to compel appraisal and for summary judgment, and real party in interest
2

(“RPI”) J. Douglas Sutter’s pending motion for final summary judgment, in the 

underlying proceeding.

1

 This Court requested and received a response.

This Court’s June 14, 2019 Order granted relator’s emergency motion to stay 

the underlying trial court proceedings and trial setting, pending disposition of this 

petition. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(a). Then on June 27, 2019, RPI Sutter filed a 

motion to reconsider lifting this Court’s stay. RPI Sutter contends that the petition 

is now moot and the stay should be lifted because the respondent signed three orders 

on June 17, 2019, denying relator’s two pending motions and RPI Sutter’s pending 

motion, and he attached copies of those orders.

Because the respondent has since ruled on the pending motions challenged by 

relator’s petition, this Court no longer has jurisdiction to grant relief because the 

petition has been rendered moot. See Tex. A&M Univ.–Kingsville v. Yarbrough, 347 

S.W.3d 289, 290–91 (Tex. 2011); In re Jackson, No. 01–12–00020–CV, 2012 WL 

405707, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Feb. 9, 2012, orig. proceeding) 

(mem. op.) (dismissing mandamus petition as moot after relator received relief 

requested).

Accordingly, we grant RPI’s Sutter’s motion to reconsider lifting the stay, lift 

this Court’s stay, and dismiss the petition as moot.

 

1 The underlying case is J. Douglas Sutter v. Safeco Insurance Company, Cause No. 

2017-54046, pending in the 152nd District Court of Harris County, Texas, the 

Honorable Robert K. Schaffer presiding.
3

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Kelly, and Goodman.
Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 2 Filed 08/01/2006 Page 1 of 1