alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_____________________________________

Page ______ is not included in this copy.

Pages 12 through 13 are not included in this copy.

_______________________________________________________________

The material not included contains the following type of
information: _____ Identity of product inert ingredients.

_____ Identity of product impurities.

_____ Description of the product manufacturing process.

_____ Description of quality control procedures.

_____ Identity of the source of product ingredients.

_____ Sales or other commercial/financial information.

_____ A draft product label.

__X__ The product confidential statement of formula.

_____ Information about a pending registration action.

_____ FIFRA registration data.

____ The document is a duplicate of page(s) ____ &____.

_____ The document is not responsive to the request.

_____ Proprietary information pertaining to the chemical composition of an inert ingredient provided by the source of the ingredient.

_____ Attorney-Client Privilege.

____ Claimed Confidential by submitter upon submission to the
Agency.

_____ Internal Deliberative Information.

______ Blank page

* The information not included is generally considered confidential by product registrants. If you have any questions, please contact the individual who prepared the response to your request.

_________________________________________________________________
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 2.1331 Commission action. ( a ) Upon completion of a hearing, the Commission will issue a written opinion including its decision on the license transfer application and the reasons for the decision.
( b ) The decision on issues designated for hearing under § 2.309 will be based on the record developed at hearing.
[63 FR 66730, Dec. 3, 1998, as amended at 69 FR 2271, Jan. 14, 2004]
1819.7302 NASA contract clauses.       (a) Contracting officers shall insert the clause at 1852.219–80, Limitation on Subcontracting—SBIR Phase I Program, in all Phase I contracts awarded under the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program established pursuant to Public Law 97–219 (the Small Business Innovation Development Act of 1982).          (b) Contracting officers shall insert the clause at 1852.219–81, Limitation on Subcontracting—SBIR Phase II Program, in all Phase II contracts awarded under the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program established pursuant to Public Law 97–219 (the Small Business Innovation Development Act of 1982).          (c) Contracting officers shall insert the clause at 1852.219–82, Limitation on Subcontracting—STTR Program, in all contracts awarded under the Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) Program established pursuant to Public Law 97–219 (the Small Business Innovation Development Act of 1982). Occasionally, deviations from this requirement may be approved. Any deviations from this requirement shall be approved in writing by the contracting officer after coordination with the Agency SBIR Program Manager/Coordinator.          (d) Contracting officers shall insert the clause at 1852.219–83, Limitation of the Principal Investigator—SBIR Program, in all contracts awarded under the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program established pursuant to Public Law 97–219 (the Small Business Innovation Development Act of 1982). Occasionally, deviations from this requirement may be approved. Any deviations from this requirement shall be approved in writing by the contracting officer after coordination with the Agency SBIR Program Manager/Coordinator.          (e) Contracting officers shall insert the clause at 1852.219–84, Limitation of the Principal Investigator—STTR Program, in all contracts awarded under the Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) Program established pursuant to Public Law 97–219 (the Small Business Innovation Development Act of 1982). Occasionally, deviations from this requirement may be approved. Any deviations from this requirement shall be approved in writing by the contracting officer after coordination with the Agency SBIR Program Manager/Coordinator.          (f) Contracting officers shall insert the clause at 1852.219–85, Conditions for Final Payment—SBIR and STTR Contracts, in all Phase I and Phase II contract awarded under the Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) Program and the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program established pursuant to Public Law 97–219 (The Small Business Innovation Development Act of 1982.)    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1819.73—Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) Programs
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

ANGELA PRICE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 3:06-cv-742-MEF

)

ROANOKE CITY BOARD OF )

EDUCATION, )

)

Defendant. )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #17) filed

on August 6, 2007, it is hereby

ORDERED that the motion be submitted without oral argument on August 29, 2007.

It is further ORDERED that the plaintiff file a response which shall include a brief

and any evidentiary materials on or before August 22, 2007. The defendant may file a reply

brief on or before August 29, 2007.

The parties are advised that if they electronically file exhibits in support of or in

opposition to this motion and those exhibits total more than twenty-five (25) pages, they

are required to submit a paper courtesy copy of the exhibits to the Chambers of the

undersigned.

DONE this the 8th day of August, 2007.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00742-MEF-WC Document 23 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Credit Union Administration

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board, Telephone: 703-518-6304. 

Mary Rupp, 

Board Secretary.

 [FR Doc. 2010-31495 Filed 12-10-10; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE P
#### Bertha W. Meister, Respondent, v. Eugene B. McAuliffe et al., as Preliminary Executors of Anton Meister, Deceased, Appellants.

Order dated December 23, 1966, to the extent appealed from, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the second amended complaint dismissed, without costs or disbursements. In our opinion the charges of fraud, duress and breach of confidential relationship are not of the kind sufficient to bring plaintiff’s ease within the doctrine of *Averbuck*v. *Averbuch*(270 App. Div. 116). Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Steuer, Tilzer and McGivern, JJ.
#### § 958.2 Act.

*Act* means Public Act No. 10, 73d Congress, as amended and as reenacted and amended by the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (48 Stat. 31, as amended; 7 U.S.C. 601 *et seq.;* 68 Stat. 906, 1047).
2829.303 Application of State and local taxes to Government contractors and subcontractors.       (a) It is DOJ policy that DOJ contracts shall not contain clauses expressly designating prime contractors as agents of the Government for the purpose of avoiding State and local taxes.          (b) A DOJ contracting activity may request to the CAO, through the HCA, that a contractor be considered an agent of the Government for the purpose of claiming immunity from State and local sales and use taxes. The CAO will review such requests to ensure compliance with DOJ policy and applicable law. Each case forwarded will be reviewed by the HCA or designee for approval before referral to the CAO.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2829.3 - State and Local Taxes
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           43720
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            2386
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  6942
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     310677
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         913084
<ALLOWANCE>                                       7830
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1332194
<DEPOSITS>                                     1021930
<SHORT-TERM>                                     67585
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              14662
<LONG-TERM>                                      88819
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         11062
<OTHER-SE>                                      128136
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 1332194
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  39552
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 9299
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   299
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 49150
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               18563
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                3427
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            27160
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      684
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 624
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  17125
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  14445
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       14445
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     10046
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       .9
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .89
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Part 5151 - Use of Government Sources by

Contractors
159 So.2d 289

#### Mrs. Dora SONNIER v. UNITED STATES CASUALTY COMPANY et al.

No. 47025.

Jan. 20, 1964.

Court of Appeal, Third Circuit.

157 So.2d 911.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue ; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified..
#### § 1017.2 Applicability.

This part applies to any person who is or was authorized access to UCNI, requires authorized access to UCNI, or attempts to gain or gains unauthorized access to UCNI.
**Docket:** ED -2014 -ICCD -0105

Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study 2015 (TIMSS:2015) Main Study **Comment On:** ED -2014 -ICCD - 0105 -0001 **Document:** ED -2014 -ICCD - 0105 -0004 Comment on FR Doc # 2014 - 17415 **Name:** Randi Weingarten **Submitter's Representativ e:**  Serette Kaminski **Organization:** American Federation of Teachers

August 7, 2014 Ms. Kate Mullan Acting Director of the Information Collection Clearance Divi sion U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Ave . S.W., LBJ Mailstop L -OM -2 -2E319, Room 2E103 Washington, DC 20202 (Submitted electronically via: www.regulations.gov) Dear Ms. Mullan: This letter is in response to the request for comments on the proposed participation of the United States in the 2015 Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) and TIMSS Advanced main study; published July 24, 2014, docket number ED -2014 -ICCD - 0105. The American Federation of Teachers supports the Department of Education's participation in the global2015 TIMSS and TIMSS Advanced and believe s this data collection is necessary and within the proper functions of the department. TIMSS does not hold undue burden because the testing process is a random sam

pling done once every four years, rather than a yearly test for all 12th- grade students. The United States last participated in the TIMSS Advanced in 1995, but did not participate in the 2008 study; we have not had a significant global study that includes U.S. student progress in advanced mathematics and science in almost 20 years. The results f rom the TIMSS Advanced study would be an important step in assessing progress at the advanced level and informing the direction of our advanced programs that prepare students for careers in science, technology, engineering and mathematics. We look forward to a responsible analysis of TIMSS and TIMSS Advanced that will help educators and the public understand the conditions and system characteristics that contribute to excellence. Sincerely, Randi Weingarten President RW: mc opeiu#2 afl - cio

### NCES **RESPO NSE** 

We are very

pleased that the American Federation of Teachers supports the United State's participation in TIMSS and TIMSS Advanced in 2015. We agree that these studies are extremely important in understanding U.S. student performance in an international context and the global competitiveness of our nation's students. Your support of TIMSS Advanced, in particular, is greatly appreciated. We will work hard to ensure that our selected students, teachers, and schools also understand the value of participation so that our results are valid. Thank you for your support of TIMSS and TIMSS Advanced. With regards, Stephen Provasnik, Ph.D. TIMSS National Research Coordinator International Activities Program National Center for Education Statistics
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Detection Technology (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jacques Tizabi, Principal Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial
Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Registrant, certify to the best
of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.



                                                    /s/ Jacques Tizabi
                                                    ------------------
Dated: August 14, 2009                              Jacques Tizabi

Principal Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) CASE NUMBER: 2:06-CR-00202-WKW 

)

EUGENE L. CLECKLER )

DEFENDANT’S SENTENCING BRIEF

COMES NOW defendant Eugene Cleckler and provides the following for

the Court’s consideration at sentencing:

BACKGROUND

Eugene Cleckler was found guilty by jury trial on January 12, 2007.

Sentencing is set for April 10, 2007. 

OBJECTIONS

1. Mr. Cleckler testified at trial in his own behalf. The defendant opposes

the obstruction application based on the defendant’s testimony at trial. 

U.S.S.G. §3C1.1, app. Note 2, states that such application should not be

“intended to punish a defendant for the exercise of a constitutional right,” such as

denying or refusing to admit guilt. See U.S. v. Urbeanek, 930 F.2d 1512, 1515

(10 Cir. 1991). Mr. Cleckler, in his testimony, simply denied involvement in the

th

crime. Mr. Cleckler did not concoct an alternative factual scenario that arises to

perjury application. 

Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 96 Filed 03/28/2007 Page 1 of 3
A finding of guilt alone is insufficient for the obstruction application. U.S.

v. Lawrence, 972 F.2d 1580, 1583 (11 Cir. 1992). th

2. The defendant opposes the application for aggravating role. Although

Mr. Cleckler was the owner of the business, there was no evidence that he led or

organized the criminal conduct. All of the alleged details were carried out by

conspirator participants who testified that the defendant merely monitored the

progress. Just because the defendant stood to benefit from the crime does not,

without more, qualify him for §3B1.1 enhancement. See U.S. v. Vandeberg, 201

F.3d 805, 811-12 (6 Cir. 2000). th

Respectfully submitted, this the 28 day of March, 2007. th

s/ Ronald R. Brunson 

RONALD R. BRUNSON 1696

ATTORNEY FOR EUGENE L. CLECKLER

2126 Morris Avenue

Birmingham, Alabama 35203

(205) 252-2100

Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 96 Filed 03/28/2007 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on March 28th, 2007, I electronically filed the

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send

notification of such filing to the following:

Andrew O. Schiff, Esq., Assistant U.S. Attorney

201 One Court Square

Post Office Box 197

Montgomery, AL 36101-0197

Andrew.schiff@usdoj.gov, Debbie.shaw@usdoj.gov

s/ Ronald R. Brunson 

 RONALD R. BRUNSON

Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 96 Filed 03/28/2007 Page 3 of 3
2916.000 Scope of part.

This part describes types of contracts that may be used in acquisitions. It further prescribes policies

and procedures for implementing contracts.

Parent topic: PART 2916 - CONTRACT TYPES
No. 89-1301.

#### Safir *v.*United States Lines, Inc., et al. (two cases).

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 110.130 Initiation of rulemaking.

The Commission may initiate action to amend the regulations in this part on its own initiative or in response to a petition.
# Subpart 3016.1—Selecting Contract Types

Source:                                75 FR 41100, July 15, 2010, unless otherwise noted.                               

**Parent topic:**PART 3016—TYPES OF CONTRACTS

## 3016.170 Contracts with Lead System Integrators.

The contracting officer should negotiate the most appropriate contract type and fee structure based on risks inherent in the work to be performed, in accordance with (FAR) 48 CFR 16.103(a). Contract type and fee structure should be commensurate with the work to be performed and the risks assumed. Worthwhile existing guidance on contract type selection, pricing, and fee structures, such as exists in Vol. I, Ch. 4 of the Contract Reference Pricing Guides [*http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/cpf/docs/contract_pricing_finance_guide/vol...*] can be consulted to determine the appropriate contract type and fee structure for use in varied contracts with lead system integrators in the production, fielding and sustainment of complex systems.
§ 110.46 Conduct resulting in termination of nuclear exports. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, no license will be issued to export nuclear equipment or material, other than byproduct material, to any non-nuclear weapon state that is found by the President to have, after March 10, 1978: ( 1 ) Detonated a nuclear explosive device;
( 2 ) Terminated or abrogated IAEA safeguards;
( 3 ) Materially violated an IAEA safeguards agreement; or
( 4 ) Engaged in activities involving source or special nuclear material and having direct significance for the manufacture or acquisition of nuclear explosive devices, and failed to take steps which represent sufficient progress toward terminating such activities.
( b ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, no license will be issued to export nuclear equipment or material, other than byproduct material, to any country or group of countries that is found by the President to have, after March 10, 1978: ( 1 ) Materially violated an agreement for cooperation with the United States or the terms of any other agreement under which nuclear equipment or material has been exported;
( 2 ) Assisted, encouraged or induced any non-nuclear weapon state to engage in activities involving source or special nuclear material and having direct significance for the manufacture or acquistion of nuclear explosive devices, and failed to take steps which represent sufficient progress toward terminating such assistance, encouragement or inducement; or
( 3 ) Entered into an agreement for the transfer of reprocessing equipment, materials or technology to the sovereign control of a non-nuclear weapon state, except in connection with an international fuel cycle evaluation in which the United States is a participant or pursuant to an international agreement or understanding to which the United States subscribes.
( c ) Under section 129 of the Atomic Energy Act, the President may waive the requirement for the termination of exports to a country described in paragraph (a) or (b) of this section after determining in writing that the cessation of exports would seriously prejudice the achievement of United States nonproliferation objectives or otherwise jeopardize the common defense and security. If the President makes this determination, the Commission will issue licenses to export to that country, if other applicable statutory provisions are met.
[43 FR 21641, May 19, 1978, as amended at 49 FR 47202, Dec. 3, 1984. Redesignated at 60 FR 37565, July 21, 1995]