T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T E L ME R C OT T ON , P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. CI TY O F LA S V EG A S; CLA RK CO U N TY TREA SU RER, D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 10- 16742 D. C . No . 2 : 1 0 - c v - 0 0 4 9 2 - R L HP AL ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

N e va da R oge rL . H unt , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d J a nua ry17, 2012 ** B efo re: L E A V Y , T A L L M A N , an d C A L L A H A N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. E lm e rC o tto n ap p e a ls p r o s e f r o m th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s s u m m a ryju d g m e n t in h is 4 2 U .S .C . § 1 9 8 3 a c tio n c o n c e rn in g th e C ity ’s d e m o litio n o f s tru c tu r e s o n h is pr ope rty . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291. W e r e vi e w de novo the 

# FI LED JAN 25 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 16742 2 d is tr ic t c o u rt’s s u m m a ry ju d g m e n t a n d s ta tu te o f lim ita tio n s d e te rm in a tio n . H erna ndezv. Sp acelab s Med. , Inc. , 3 4 3 F .3 d 1 1 0 7 , 1 1 1 2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 3 ) . W e a f f i rm . T he di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l y di s m i s s e d a s unt i m e l yC ott on’ s c l a i m s c onc e rni ng the C i ty ’ s a l l e ge d f

a i l ur e t o pr ovi de pr ope rnot i c e r e ga r di ng the de m ol i t i on of s truc tur e s on hi s pr ope rty a nd the a s s e s s m e ntof aba t e m e ntf

e e s be c aus e C ott on f ile d th is a c tio n m o r e th a n tw o y e a r s a f te rh is c la im s a c c ru e d . See Fi nk v. Sh edler , 19 2 F . 3d 91 1, 91 4 (9th C i r. 19 99 ) ( fe dera l court s app l y the forum st at e’ s per sonal in ju ry s ta tu te o f

lim ita tio n s f

o r§ 1 9 8 3 c la im s ) ; P erez v. Seevers , 869 F . 2d 425, 426 (9th C i r. 19 89 ) ( per c uri am ) ( N evada’ s s t atut e of l i m i t at i on s f or pers on al i nj ury c l a i m s i s tw o y e a r s ) ( c i t i ng N e v. R e v. S t a t . § 11. 190( 4) ( e ) ) . F urthe rm or e , C ott on f a ile d to e s tab lis h ab a s is f o re q u itab le to llin g , se e N e v. R e v. S t a t . § 11. 250 ( N e v a d a ’s to llin g s ta tu te ) , o re q u itab le e s to p p e l, see Ch eq er, In c. v. P a i n ters & D ec orators J

oi ntC om m . , Inc. , 6 5 5 P .2 d 9 9 6 , 9 9 8 - 9 9 ( N e v . 1 9 8 2 ) ( lis tin g e le m e n ts of equi t abl e e st op pel ). T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt d id n o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n b yd e n y in g C o tto n ’s m o tio n to c o n d u c t d is c o v e ry . Se e H al le t t v . Mor gan , 29 6 F . 3d 73 2, 75 1 (9th C i r. 20 02 ) ( tri al c ourt ’ s br oa d di s c r e t i on t o de ny di s c ove ry“ w i l l notbe di s turbe d e xc e ptupon the cl eare stshow i ng that[the] deni al of di sc ov ery r es ul t [e d] i n actual and sub st ant i al10- 16742 3 pr e j udi c e t o the c om pl a i ni ng l i t i ga nt ” ( c i t a t i on and i nt e rna l quot a t i on m a rks om i tt ed)) . C ott on ’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. AF F I RME D.