alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of CST Brands, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Clayton E. Killinger, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|   |                                                                                                                      
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










/s/ Clayton E. Killinger


Clayton E. Killinger


Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


June 8, 2015








This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1964, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3426 

To extend temporarily the duty on carbamic acid. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 6, 2006 

Mr. DURBIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the duty on carbamic acid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CARBAMIC ACID. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.33.61 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 ((3-((Dimethylamino)carbonyl)–2-pyridinyl)sulfonyl) car7 bamic acid, phenyl ester) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/ 

8 2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•S 3426 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
#### § 900.38 Pre-hearing information sessions.

A pre-hearing information session concerning a proposal to amend a fruit, vegetable or nut marketing agreement or order may be held either prior or subsequent to submission of a proposal under § 900.3 of this part. Such sessions may be held by a marketing agreement or order committee or board or by the Secretary.
742.1503 Procedures.       (a) [Reserved]          (b) Personal services contractors shall be recognized as Government personnel for the purposes of the restriction on access to contractor performance information in (48 CFR) FAR 42.1503.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 742.15—Contractor Performance Information
#### § 1016.21 Accountability for Secret Restricted Data.

Each permittee possessing classified matter (including classified matter in electronic format) containing Secret Restricted Data shall establish accountability procedures and shall maintain logs to document access to and record comprehensive disposition information for all such classified matter that has been in his custody at any time.

[82 FR 41507, Sept. 1, 2017]
§ 13.1 Basis and purpose. ( a ) *Basis.* This part implements the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986, Public Law No. 99-509, §§ 6101-6104, 100 Stat. 1874 (October 21, 1986) (31 U.S.C. 3801-3812). 31 U.S.C. 3809 requires each authority head to promulgate regulations necessary to implement the provisions of that Act.
( b ) *Purpose.* This part ( 1 ) establishes administrative procedures for imposing civil penalties and assessments against persons who make, submit, or present, or cause to be made, submitted, or presented, false, fictitious, or fraudulent claims or written statements to authorities or to their agents, and
( 2 ) specifies the hearing and appeal rights of persons subject to allegations of liability for such penalties and assessments.
226 So.2d 525

#### Robert E. PIPER v. John R. NEYREY.

No. 49965.

Oct. 1, 1969.

In re: John R. Neyrey applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal we find no error of law in the judgment.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CRIMINAL ACTION NO.

) 2:06cr203-MHT

JOSEPH LEE STRINGER )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the government’s motion for a

final order of forfeiture (Doc. No. 34) is set for

submission, without oral argument, on June 1, 2007, with

any responses due by said date.

DONE, this the 24th day of May, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00203-MHT-CSC Document 35 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

 _______________________________

ARTHUR JAMES TIGNER, #152 184 *

Plaintiff, *

 v. * 3:06-CV-713-MHT

 

OFFICER SELLER, et al., *

Defendants. *

 _______________________________

ORDER ON MOTION

Pending before the court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Discovery. Plaintiff’s motion has

been read, considered and shall be denied. The material requested in Plaintiff’s motion is

either cumulative of information already provided by Defendants or irrelevant to a

determination of the issue pending before this court. Plaintiff’s request, however, may be

reconsidered by the court if warranted by further developments in this case.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Motion for Discovery (Doc. No. 19) be and is

hereby DENIED.

DONE, this 10th day of January 2007.

 /s/Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00713-MHT-SRW Document 23 Filed 01/10/2007 Page 1 of 1
227 So.2d 144

#### Fred B. KING et ux. v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 50043.

Oct. 23, 1969.

In re: Fred B. King and Merle N. King applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit', Parish of East Baton Rouge. 224 So.2d 42.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal we find no error of law in its judgment.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

DERON L. BARNETT, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv725-MHT

) (WO)

REGIONS BANK, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

On August 11, 2006, pro se plaintiff Deron Barnett filed this action against defendant

Regions Bank. According to Barnett, Regions Bank wrongfully allowed someone to take

$15,000.00 from his safety deposit box in December 2002.

Because federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, it is a basic premise of federal

court practice that the court must have jurisdiction over the subject matter of the action

before it can act. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994);

Burns v. Windsor Ins. Co., 31 F.3d 1092, 1095 (11 Cir. 1994). Thus, federal courts only th

have the power to hear cases as authorized by the Constitution or the laws of the United

States, see Kokkonen, 511 U.S. at 377, and are required to inquire into their jurisdiction at

the earliest possible point in the proceeding. Univ. of S. Ala. v. Am. Tobacco Co., 168 F.3d

405, 410 (11 Cir. 1999). In addition, FED R. CIV. P. 12(h)(3) requires that “[w]herever it th

appears . . . that the court lacks jurisdiction, the court shall dismiss the action.” This court

operates under an independent obligation to examine its own jurisdiction continues at each

stage of the proceedings, even if no party raises the jurisdictional issues and both parties are

Case 2:06-cv-00725-MHT-CSC Document 6 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 1 of 2
prepared to concede it. FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of Dallas, 493 U.S. 215 (1990). “It is axiomatic

that a district court may inquire into the basis of its subject matter jurisdiction at any stage

of the proceedings.” See 13 C. Wright, A. Miller & E. Cooper, Federal Practice & Procedure

3522 (1975).

It does not appear from a review of the complaint that the plaintiff presents a federal

question to invoke this court’s federal question jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1331. In

addition, it appears that the amount in controversy does not exceed $75,000. Thus, there

does not appear to be diversity jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Consequently, on the face

of the complaint, it does not appear that this court has jurisdiction over this matter.

Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED that on or before August 31, 2006, the plaintiff shall show cause why this

case should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The plaintiff is advised

that if he fails to respond to respond to this order with specificity, the court will treat

his failure to respond as an abandonment of the claims set forth in his complaint. The

plaintiff is further cautioned that if he fails to file a response in accordance with the

directives of this order, the court will recommend that this case be dismissed. 

Done this 17th day of August, 2006.

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00725-MHT-CSC Document 6 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 2 of 2
#### § 631.23 State conservationist's authority.

The state conservationist may take the initiative to revise or require revision of any determination made by the contracting officer or the district conservationist in connection with the program, except that the state conservationist may not revise any executed contract other than as may specifically be authorized herein.
Subpart 639.1—General

Parent topic: PART 639—ACQUISITION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

639.107 Contract clause.

639.107-70 DOSAR solicitation provision and contract

clause.

(a) The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 652.239–70, Information Technology Security

Plan and Accreditation, in solicitations that include information technology resources or services in

which the contractor will have physical or electronic access to Department information that directly

supports the mission of the Department.

(b) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 652.239–71, Security Requirements for

Unclassified Information Technology Resources, in solicitations and contracts containing the

provision at 652.239–70. The provision and clause shall not be inserted in solicitations and contracts

for personal services with individuals.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 238 (Monday, December 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 77680]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31393]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, 
December 16, 2010 at 2 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), (8), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of 
the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Walter, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, 
December 16, 2010 will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
Regulatory matters regarding financial institutions; and
Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: The Office of the 
Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: December 9, 2010.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-31393 Filed 12-9-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 32 (Thursday, February 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 7283]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3141]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Strengthening Global Human-Animal Interface 
Activities for Avian Influenza and Other Zoonotic Diseases, Funding 
Opportunity Announcement (FOA) CK10-001, Initial Review

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting:

    Time and Date: 12 p.m.-2 p.m., April 7, 2010 (Closed).
    Place: Teleconference.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting will include the initial 
review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in 
response to ``Strengthening Global Human-Animal Interface Activities 
for Avian Influenza and other Zoonotic Diseases, FOA CK10-001.''

    Contact Person for More Information: Gregory Anderson, M.S., 
M.P.H., Scientific Review Officer, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., 
Mailstop E60, Atlanta, GA 30333, Telephone: (404) 498-2293.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and 
Disease Registry.

    Dated: February 11, 2010.
Andre Tyler,
Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2010-3141 Filed 2-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
# 5114.409-2 Award of classified contracts.

The contracting officer shall advise unsuccessful bidders to dispose of classified information in accordance with Army Regulation 380-5.

**Parent topic:**5114.409 Information to bidders.
#### In re GIBBS.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

September 26, 1906.)

In the matter of the application of Milton B. Gibbs for a writ of mandamus against John F. O'Brien, Secretary of State.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with costs.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 2:06-cr-206-MHT 

 ) 

ALETHIA ADRIANNE SCOTT )

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO DISMISS INDICTMENT

Comes now the United States of America by and through its Attorney for the Middle District

of Alabama and moves the Court for leave to dismiss the Indictment filed August 15, 2006, in the

above styled cause to Alethia Adrianne Scott, on the following grounds, to wit: 

Superseding Indictment filed September 7, 2006. 

Respectfully submitted this the 12th day of September, 2006.

Respectfully submitted,

LEURA GARRETT CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/ Christopher A. Snyder

CHRISTOPHER A. SNYDER

One Court Street

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Phone: (334) 223-7280

FAX: (334) 223-7135

christopher.a.snyder@usdoj.gov

Case 2:06-cr-00206-MHT-CSC Document 19 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 1 of 2
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 2:06-cr-206-MHT 

 ) 

ALETHIA ADRIANNE SCOTT )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on September 12, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with the

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the

following: Kevin L. Butler.

LEURA GARRETT CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/ Christopher A. Snyder

CHRISTOPHER A. SNYDER

One Court Street

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Phone: (334) 223-7280

FAX: (334) 223-7135

christopher.a.snyder@usdoj.gov

Case 2:06-cr-00206-MHT-CSC Document 19 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 2 of 2
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 2:06-cr-206-MHT 

 ) 

ALETHIA ADRIANNE SCOTT )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the Motion for Leave to Dismiss the Indictment as to Alethia Adrianne

Scott, heretofore filed in the above styled cause, and for good cause shown, the Court is of the

opinion that the motion should be and the same hereby is granted. It is, therefore, CONSIDERED,

ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED by the Court that said motion be and the same is hereby

granted.

DONE this day of September, 2006.

 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

DISMISSAL OF INDICTMENT

Comes now the United States of America with leave of the Court first had and obtained

and dismisses the Indictment heretofore filed in the above styled cause as to Alethia Adrianne

Scott.

Respectfully submitted,

LEURA GARRETT CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/ Christopher A. Snyder

CHRISTOPHER A. SNYDER

One Court Street

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Phone: (334) 223-7280

FAX: (334) 223-7135

christopher.a.snyder@usdoj.gov

Case 2:06-cr-00206-MHT-CSC Document 19-2 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 1 of 1
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 2:06-mj-79-SRW 

 )

SANTO COLEMAN )

)

GOVERNMENT'S MOTION FOR DETENTION HEARING

Comes now the United States of America, by and through Leura

G. Canary, United States Attorney for the Middle District of

Alabama, and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3142(e) and (f) moves for a

detention hearing for the above-captioned defendant.

1. Eligibility of Cases

This case is eligible for a detention order because this case

involves:

Crime of violence (18 U.S.C. 3156)

Maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death

 X 10 + year drug offense

 Felony, with two prior convictions in the above categories

 X Serious risk the defendant will flee

 X Serious risk of obstruction of justice

2. Reason For Detention

The Court should detain defendant because there are no

conditions of release which will reasonably assure:

 X Defendant's appearance as required

 X Safety of any other person and the community

3. Rebuttable Presumption

The United States will invoke the rebuttable presumption

Case 2:06-mj-00079-SRW Document 19 Filed 08/28/2006 Page 1 of 2
against defendant under Section 3142(e). The presumption applies

because:

X Probable cause to believe defendant committed 10 + year

drug offense or an offense in which a firearm was used or

carried under Section 924(c)

 Previous conviction for "eligible" offense committed while

on pretrial bond

 A period of five years has not elapsed from defendant's

conviction or release from imprisonment for the offense

described above

4. Time For Detention Hearing

The United States requests the Court conduct the detention

hearing:

At the initial appearance

 X After continuance of 3 days

The Government requests leave of Court to file a supplemental

motion with additional grounds or presumption for detention should

this be necessary.

Respectfully submitted this the 28th day of August, 2006.

LEURA G. CANARY 

United States Attorney

s/Terry F. Moorer

TERRY F. MOORER

Assistant United States Attorney

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334)223-7280

Fax: (334)223-7135

E-mail: terry.moorer@usdoj.gov

ASB-1176-O73T

Case 2:06-mj-00079-SRW Document 19 Filed 08/28/2006 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Buckingham Exploration Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|  

Dated: September 15, 2008
     By:/s/ Christopher Robin RelphChristopher Robin RelphChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


---