alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) Case No.: 3:06cr208-MEF

 )

JASON EDWARD COFIELD )

MOTION TO CONTINUE DETENTION HEARING

COMES NOW the Defendant, Jason Edward Cofield, by and through undersigned

counsel, Donnie W. Bethel, and respectfully moves this Court to continue the detention hearing

scheduled for today, Wednesday, September 6, 2006 at 2:00 p.m. for the following reasons:

1. Today at approximately 12:00 p.m., undersigned counsel was informed there is a

conflict of interest in the Office of the Federal Defender representing Mr. Cofield.

2. In order to eliminate any potential issues regarding this conflict, undersigned

counsel will withdraw as counsel and CJA panel counsel will be appointed to represent Mr.

Cofield.

3. This withdrawal and subsequent appointment of new counsel will not be

completed before the time of the detention hearing. 

WHEREFORE, undersigned counsel asks that the detention hearing be continued.

Respectfully submitted, 

s/ Donnie W. Bethel

DONNIE W. BETHEL

Assistant Federal Defender

201 Monroe Street, Suite 407

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Phone: (334) 834-2099

Fax: (334) 834-0353

E-mail:don_bethel@fd.org

IN Bar Code: 14773-49

Case 3:06-cr-00208-MEF-CSC Document 8 Filed 09/06/2006 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) Case No.: 3:06cr208-MEF

 )

JASON EDWARD COFIELD )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on September 6, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk

of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following:

Verne H. Speirs, Esq., Assistant U. S. Attorney, One Court Square, Suite 201, Montgomery,

Alabama 36104. 

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Donnie W. Bethel

DONNIE W. BETHEL

Assistant Federal Defender

201 Monroe Street, Suite 407

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Phone: (334) 834-2099

Fax: (334) 834-0353

E-mail:don_bethel@fd.org

IN Bar Code: 14773-49

Case 3:06-cr-00208-MEF-CSC Document 8 Filed 09/06/2006 Page 2 of 2
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

AUGUST 15, 2011

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 ________________________

 No. 10-11820 

Non-Argument Calendar

 ________________________

 D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cr-00534-RAL-AEP-2

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SHIRLEY DANIELS, 

a.k.a. Miss Shelly

llllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

 Appeal from the United States District Court

 for the Middle District of Florida

 ________________________

(August 15, 2011)

Before EDMONDSON, HULL and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
R. Scott Andringa, appointed counsel for Shirley Daniels, in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.

1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Daniels’s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.

2
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

JAMES KUCZMASKI, etc., et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, ) CIVIL ACTION NUMBER:

) 2:06-cv-731-MHT-SRW

vs. ) JURY DEMAND

) UNOPPOSED

US FOODSERVICE, )

)

Defendant. )

)

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO CONTINUE THE TELEPHONE HEARING

CURRENTLY SCHEDULED FOR OCTOBER 11, 2007 AT 9:00 A.M

COME NOW the plaintiffs, by and through the undersigned counsel, and request this

Honorable Court to continue the fairness hearing currently scheduled for October 11, 2007 at 9:00

a.m. As grounds for this Motion, the plaintiffs state the following:

1. Plaintiffs’ counsel, Gregory O. Wiggins and Kevin W. Jent, are scheduled to be in

a trial beginning Tuesday, October 9, 2007 in the case Joey Battles vs. Mitchell

GroceryCorporation, 2:05-cv-1570-VEH. The case is expected to last the remainder

of the week.

2. Therefore, counsel is not available for the scheduled telephone hearing on October

11, 2007 at 9:00 a.m.

3. Plaintiffs’ counsel hasspoken with defendant’s counsel and both parties are available

to reschedule the telephone hearing for the afternoon of October 16, 2007 (after

11:00 a.m.) or all day either October 17

th

or October 18

th

, 2007.

Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 45 Filed 09/26/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the plaintiffs respectfully request

this HonorableCourt continue the telephone hearing currently scheduled for October

11, 2007 at 9:00 a.m. until either the afternoon or October 16

th

or any time October

17

th

or 18

th

, 2007.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/  	 



Gregory O. Wiggins

Counsel for the Plaintiff

OF COUNSEL:

WIGGINS, CHILDS, QUINN & PANTAZIS, LLC

The Kress Building

301 19

th Street North

Birmingham, Alabama 35203

205/314-0500

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I do hereby certify that I have filed the above and foregoing by CM/ECF today, September

26, 2007, with copies being served on:

Tammy L. Baker

Jackson Lewis, LLP

2001 Park Place North

Suite 650

Birmingham, Alabama 35203

/s/  	 



Gregory O. Wiggins

Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 45 Filed 09/26/2007 Page 2 of 2
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) Case No.: 3:06cr204-MEF

)

HENRY ERIK YAPIAS )

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

COMES NOW the undersigned counsel, Jennifer A. Hart, and enters her appearance on

behalf of the Defendant, HENRY ERIK YAPIAS, in the above-styled case.

Dated this 4 day of October 2006. th

Respectfully submitted, 

s/Jennifer A. Hart

JENNIFER A. HART

FEDERAL DEFENDERS

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

201 Monroe Street, Suite 407

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334) 834-2099

Fax: (334) 834-0353

jennifer_hart@fd.org

AL Bar Code: HAR189

Case 3:06-cr-00204-MEF-CSC Document 11 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on October 4, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk

of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following:

Chris Snyder, Assistant United States Attorney.

Respectfully submitted,

s/Jennifer A. Hart

JENNIFER A. HART

FEDERAL DEFENDERS

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

201 Monroe Street, Suite 407

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334) 834-2099

Fax: (334) 834-0353

jennifer_hart@fd.org

AL Bar Code: HAR189

Case 3:06-cr-00204-MEF-CSC Document 11 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 USC, SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  quarterly  report of Alpha  Spacecom,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the six month period ended June 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
the  undersigned,  in the capacity  and on the date  indicated  below,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C./  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: November 29, 2005                 s/Xuedong Hu
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Xuedong Hu, Chief Executive Officer/CFO
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan
February 8, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 135682 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr.

_____________ _______________ ____________ Stephen J. Markman, Justices IN RE IYANA ELIZABE TH BAKER, Minor.

_____________ _______________ _____________
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Appellee,

v SC: 135682 COA: 277928 Oakland CC

MICHELLE ANN GACH, Respondent-Appellant. Family Division: 06-728394-NA

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 8, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

s0205 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
February 8, 2008
Clerk
# Subpart 3012.3—Solicitation Provisions and Contract Clauses for the Acquisition of Commercial Items

**Parent topic:**PART 3012—ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL ITEMS

## 3012.301 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses for the acquisition of commercial items.

(f) Solicitation provisions and contract clauses. Insert (HSAR) 48 CFR 3052.212–70, Contract Terms and Conditions Applicable to DHS Acquisition of Commercial Items, in any solicitation or contract for commercial items when any of the provisions or clauses listed therein applies and where incorporation by reference of each selected provision or clause is, to the maximum extent practicable, consistent with customary commercial practice. If necessary, tailor this clause.
159 So.2d 287

#### Leo O. SILVIA v. Oliver N. LAURENT.

No. 47042.

Jan. 20, 1964.

In re: Leo O. Silvia applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 157 So.2d 623.

Writ denied. *No*error of law.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

WILLIE MCNAIR, )

)

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv695-WKW

)

RICHARD ALLEN, et al., )

)

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. )

____________________________________

JAMES CALLAHAN, )

)

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv919-WKW

)

RICHARD ALLEN, et al., )

)

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. )

ORDER

Upon consideration of the defendants’ motion to compel responses to

interrogatories (doc. # 78), it is

ORDERED that on or before August 17, 2007, the opposing party shall show

cause why the motion should not be granted.

Done this 6th day of August, 2007.

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 79 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Robert E. Ritchey, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Intervoice, Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)  [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];  c)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  d)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: January 10, 2005              /s/ Robert E. Ritchey   Robert E. Ritchey   President and Chief Executive Officer
§ 1013.20 Disclosure of documents. ( a ) Upon written request to the reviewing official, the defendant may review any relevant and material documents, transcripts, records, and other materials that relate to the allegations set out in the complaint and upon which the findings and conclusions of the investigating official under § 1013.4(b) are based, unless such documents are subject to a privilege under Federal law. Upon payment of fees for duplication, the defendant may obtain copies of such documents.
( b ) Upon written request to the reviewing official, the defendant also may obtain a copy of all exculpatory information in the possession of the reviewing official or investigating official relating to the allegations in the complaint, even if it is contained in a document that would otherwise be privileged. If the document would otherwise be privileged, only that portion containing exculpatory information must be disclosed.
( c ) The notice sent to the Attorney General from the reviewing official as described in § 1013.5 of the part is not discoverable under any circumstances.
( d ) The defendant may file a motion to compel disclosure of the documents subject to the provisions of this section. Such a motion may only be filed with the ALJ following the filing of an answer pursuant to § 1013.9 of this part.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

 ______________________________

JEREMIAH W. GREEN *

Plaintiff, *

 v. * 2:06-CV-667-WKW

 

AJA ROBERTS *

Defendant. *

 ______________________________

ORDER ON MOTION

Upon consideration of Plaintiff's Notice to the Court, which the court construes as also

containing a Motion for Extension of Time, and for good cause, it is ORDERED that: 

1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. No. 38) is GRANTED; and

2. Plaintiff is GRANTED an extension from January 12, 2007 to January 16, 2007 to

file his response to Defendant’s written report, as supplemented.

Done, this 4th day of January 2007.

 /s/Wallace Capel, Jr. 

WALLACE CAPEL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 39 Filed 01/04/2007 Page 1 of 1
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3453 

To provide for duty free treatment for certain United States Government 

property returned to the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 6, 2006 

Mrs. MURRAY (for herself and Ms. CANTWELL) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To provide for duty free treatment for certain United States 

Government property returned to the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DUTY FREE TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN UNITED 

4 STATES GOVERNMENT PROPERTY RETURNED 

5 TO THE UNITED STATES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter I of chapter 98 of the 

7 Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•S 3453 IS 

‘‘ 9801.00.11 United States Government property, returned to the United States 

without having been advanced in 

value or improved in condition by 

any means while abroad, entered 

by the United States or a contractor to the United States Government, and certified by the importer as United States Government property ................................ Free 

’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
MINUTES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

HON. MYRON H. THOMPSON, JUDGE AT MONTGOMERY ALABAMA

DATE COMMENCED February 16, 2007 AT 8:35 A.M./P.M.

DATE COMPLETED February 16, 2007 AT 9:33 A.M./P.M.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Criminal Action

1:06cr206-MHT 

VS.

ALETHIA ADRIANNE SCOTT

 

PLAINTIFF/GOVERNMENT APPEARANCES DEFENDANT(S)

AUSA Christopher A. Synder X Atty Kevin L. Butler

X

X

X

 X 

COURT OFFICIALS PRESENT:

Anthony Green, Tashwanda Pinchback, Mitchell Reisner,

Courtroom Clerk Law Clerk Court Reporter

PROCEEDINGS:

( ) NONJURY TRIAL

(x) OTHER PROCEEDING: SENTENCING HEARING

8:35 a.m. Sentencing hearing commenced. Terms of plea

agreement stated on the record. Probation

concurs with plea agreement. Court accepts

plea agreement. Defendant's ORAL MOTION to

amend (with attachment) PSR as stated on the

record. ORAL ORDER granting ORAL MOTION to

amend PSR as stated on the record.

Defendant's evidence commenced. Defendant's

ORAL MOTION to continue sentencing. ORAL

ORDER granting ORAL MOTION to continue. Order

to issue resetting sentencing date. 

9:33 a.m. Hearing concluded.

Case 2:06-cr-00206-MHT-CSC Document 64 Filed 02/16/2007 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v 1:06cr206-01-MHT

ALETHIA ADRIANNE SCOTT

GOVERNMENT DEFENDANT

WITNESS LIST

 1. DOROTHY COKER 

 

Case 2:06-cr-00206-MHT-CSC Document 64-2 Filed 02/16/2007 Page 1 of 1
 DEFENDANT'S

 EXHIBIT

SENTENCING HEARING 2/16/07 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v

ALETHIA ADRIANNE SCOTT

1:06cr206-MHT

JUDGE MYRON H. THOMPSON

MITCHELL REISNER, COURT REPORTER

 

ADMITTED

 DATE

 OFFERED

 DATE 

IDENTIFIED

 

NO

 

WITNESS OBJ

 

 DESCRIPTION

2/16/07 2/16/07 2/16/07 1 Agreement between Path to Success, Inc. and

Alethia A. Scott

*Exhibit located in envelope with case file

Case 2:06-cr-00206-MHT-CSC Document 64-3 Filed 02/16/2007 Page 1 of 1
Subpart 319.2 - Policies    **Parent topic:** PART 319 - SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS319.201 General policy.       (d) The functional management responsibilities for the Department of Health and Human Services' (HHS) small business program are delegated to the Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization (OSDBU) Director.          (e)          (1)  			The HHS OSDBU Director shall exercise full management authority over the small business program. The small business specialist (SBS) shall review and make recommendations for all acquisitions, unless exempted by statute, that are not being set aside for small business in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 19.502. The review must take place prior to issuing the solicitation.          (2) Within the Indian Health Service (IHS), the primary SBSs are responsible for IHS' overall implementation of the HHS small business program; however, each IHS contracting office will assign a small business technical advisor (SBTA) to perform those functions and responsibilities necessary to implement the small business program. The primary IHS SBS shall assist and provide guidance to respective SBTAs.319.270-1 Mentor Protégé Program Solicitation provision and contract clause.       (a) The contacting officer shall insert the provision at 352.219-70, Mentor-Protégé Program, in solicitations that include the clause at FAR 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan. The provision requires offerors to provide the contracting officer a copy of their HHS Office of OSDBU-approved mentor-protégé agreement in response to a solicitation.          (b) The contacting officer shall insert the clause at 352.219-71, Mentor-Protégé Program Reporting Requirements, in contracts that include the clause at FAR 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan, and which are awarded to a contractor with an HHS OSDBU-approved mentor-protégé agreement.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cr-193-MEF

)

JOSHUA WAYNE HESTER )

O R D E R

It is hereby ORDERED that this case is set for a sentencing hearing on May 31, 2007

at 9:00 A.M. in the United States Courthouse, One Church Street, Courtroom 2A,

Montgomery, Alabama.

It is further ORDERED that a hearing will also be held on May 31, 2007 at 9:00 A.M.

in the United States Courthouse, One Church Street, Courtroom 2A, Montgomery, Alabama,

to address the issue of defense counsel's failure to appear at the April 6, 2007 sentencing

hearing.

DONE this 16th day of April, 2007.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00193-MEF-CSC Document 54 Filed 04/16/2007 Page 1 of 1