alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
336.570 Contract clause.       (a) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 352.236-70, Design-Build Contracts, in all solicitations and contracts for all design-build requirements.          (b) The contracting officer shall use Alternate I to the clause at 352.236-70, Design-Build Contracts, in all solicitations and contracts for construction when Fast-Track procedures are being used.          (c) Due to the importance of maintaining consistency in the contractor's personnel during design-build construction, the contracting officer should consider including the clause at 352.237-75, Key personnel.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 336.5 - Contract Clause
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rasool Salaam, Appellant.

Submitted July 30, 2007;

decided September 6, 2007

Reported below, 36 AD3d 969.

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Susan T. Aron, Esq., PO Box 113, Voorheesville, New York 12186 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
# Subpart 2817.1 - Multiyear Contracting

**Parent topic:**PART 2817 - SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS

## 2817.104 General.

The SPE is the agency head for the purposes of FAR 17.104(b).
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 22

- 00491

- CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding 97th District Court of Montague County, Texas Trial Court No. 2021

- 0355M

- CV

Before Bassel, Birdwell, and Walker, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### I N RE 

### W ALLACE 

### W AYNE 

### B OWMAN 

### , J R



### . , Relator2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of ma ndamus and is of the
opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus is denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered : December 14, 2022
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           50270
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            1749
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    64
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     338076
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        1343051
<ALLOWANCE>                                      13201
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1833636
<DEPOSITS>                                     1398818
<SHORT-TERM>                                     63483
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              23968
<LONG-TERM>                                     155997
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         13528
<OTHER-SE>                                      177842
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 1833636
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  87984
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                15535
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   507
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                104026
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               39399
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               10089
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            54538
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     2571
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                1130
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  39143
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  24289
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       24289
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     16889
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.27
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

)

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-CR-00202-WKW

)

EUGENE CLECKLER )

ORDER

The case is before the court on Defendant’s Request for Bond Pending Appeal (Doc. # 112).

Mr. Cleckler argues that he is not likely to flee, that he does not pose a danger to the community, that

his appeal is not for the purpose of delay, and that his issues on appeal “raise substantial issues of

fact and law.” Mr. Cleckler’s request fails because the issues he intends to argue on appeal, as stated

in his request, are not “likely to result in--(i) reversal, (ii) an order for a new trial, (iii) a sentence that

does not include a term of imprisonment, or (iv) a reduced sentence . . . .” 18 U.S.C.

§ 3143(b)(1)(B). Accordingly, the request (Doc. # 112) is DENIED.

DONE this 10th day of August, 2007.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 117 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 1 of 1
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 2.1002 [Reserved]
§ 110.7b Deliberate misconduct. ( a ) Any licensee, applicant for a license, employee of a licensee or applicant; or any contractor (including a supplier or consultant), subcontractor, employee of a contractor or subcontractor of any licensee or applicant for a license, who knowingly provides to any licensee, applicant, contractor, or subcontractor, any components, equipment, materials, or other goods or services that relate to a licensee's or applicant's activities in this part, may not: ( 1 ) Engage in deliberate misconduct that causes or would have caused, if not detected, a licensee or applicant to be in violation of any rule, regulation, or order; or any term, condition, or limitation of any license issued by the Commission; or
( 2 ) Deliberately submit to the NRC, a licensee, an applicant, or a licensee's or applicant's contractor or subcontractor, information that the person submitting the information knows to be incomplete or inaccurate in some respect material to the NRC.
( b ) A person who violates paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this section may be subject to enforcement action in accordance with the procedures in 10 CFR part 2, subpart B.
( c ) For the purposes of paragraph (a)(1) of this section, deliberate misconduct by a person means an intentional act or omission that the person knows: ( 1 ) Would cause a licensee or applicant to be in violation of any rule, regulation, or order; or any term, condition, or limitation, of any license issued by the Commission; or
( 2 ) Constitutes a violation of a requirement, procedure, instruction, contract, purchase order, or policy of a licensee, applicant, contractor, or subcontractor.
[63 FR 1900, Jan. 13, 1998]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

 

 

ROGAL : CIVIL ACTION

 :

 :

 v. :

:

 : 

SKILSTAF, INC. : NO. 05-6073

 

ROGAL : CIVIL ACTION

 :

 :

 v. :

:

 : 

SKILSTAF, INC. : NO. 05-6074

 

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 12 day of April, 2006, in accordance with the court's th

procedure for random reassignment of cases, it is hereby

ORDERED that the above-captioned cases are reassigned from the calendar

of the Honorable Herbert J. Hutton to the calendar of the Honorable J. Curtis Joyner.

 FOR THE COURT:

 HARVEY BARTLE III 

 Chief Judge

 ATTEST:

 s / Michael E. Kunz 

 MICHAEL E. KUNZ

 Clerk of Court

Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 11 Filed 04/12/2006 Page 1 of 1 Case 2:05-cv-06073-JCJ Document 11 Filed 04/12/2006 Page 1 of 1
EPA and Port of Portland Meeting

April 2, 2013

Attendees

EPA –Liz McDermott, Tim Smith

Port of Portland – David Ashton, Joshua Cleaver, Stan Jones

EPA and Port of Portland met to discuss a number of issues from the proposed revisions to the 

UST regulations. The discussion was primarily about previously deferred airport hydrant 

systems.
#### § 948.7 Handler.

*Handler* is synonymous with *shipper* and means any person, except a common or contract carrier of potatoes owned by another person, who handles potatoes.
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 2.1022 Second prehearing conference. ( a ) The Commission or the presiding officer in a proceeding on either an application for construction authorization for a high-level radioactive waste repository at a geologic repository operations area under parts 60 or 63 of this chapter, or an application for a license to receive and possess high-level radioactive waste at a geologic repository operations area under parts 60 or 63 of this chapter, shall direct the parties, interested governmental participants, or their counsel to appear at a specified time and place not later than thirty days after the Safety Evaluation Report is issued by the NRC staff for a conference to consider: ( 1 ) Any amended contentions submitted, which must be reviewed under the criteria in § 2.309(c) of this part;
( 2 ) Simplification, clarification, and specification of the issues;
( 3 ) The obtaining of stipulations and admissions of fact and of the contents and authenticity of documents to avoid unnecessary proof;
( 4 ) Identification of witnesses and the limitation of the number of expert witnesses, and other steps to expedite the presentation of evidence;
( 5 ) The setting of a hearing schedule;
( 6 ) Establishing a discovery schedule for the proceeding taking into account the objective of meeting the three year time schedule specified in section 114(d) of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 10134(d); and
( 7 ) Such other matters as may aid in the orderly disposition of the proceeding.
( b ) A prehearing conference held pursuant to this section shall be stenographically reported.
( c ) The Presiding Officer shall enter an order which recites the action taken at the conference and the agreements by the parties, limits the issues or defines the matters in controversy to be determined in the proceeding, sets a discovery schedule, and sets the hearing schedule.
[54 FR 14944, Apr. 14, 1989, as amended at 56 FR 7797, Feb. 26, 1991; 69 FR 2266, Jan. 14, 2004]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Thomas H. Foreman, Appellant.

Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 29,1968, affirmed, on the opinion at the Criminal Term by Mr. Justice McDonald. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 2.311 Interlocutory review of rulings on requests for hearings/petitions to intervene, selection of hearing procedures, and requests by potential parties for access to sensitive unclassified non-safeguards information and safeguards information. ( a ) An order of the presiding officer, or if a presiding officer has not been designated, of the Chief Administrative Judge, or if he or she is unavailable, of another administrative judge, or of an administrative law judge with jurisdiction under § 2.318(a), may be appealed to the Commission with respect to: ( 1 ) A request for hearing;
( 2 ) A petition to intervene; or
( 3 ) A request for access to sensitive unclassified non-safeguards information (SUNSI), including, but not limited to, proprietary, confidential commercial, and security-related information, and Safeguards Information (SGI). An appeal to the Commission may also be taken from an order of an officer designated to rule on information access issues.
( b ) These appeals must be made as specified by the provisions of this section, within 25 days after the service of the order. The appeal must be initiated by the filing of a notice of appeal and accompanying supporting brief. Any party who opposes the appeal may file a brief in opposition to the appeal within 25 days after service of the appeal. The supporting brief and any answer must conform to the requirements of § 2.341(c)(3). No other appeals from rulings on requests for hearing are allowed.
( c ) An order denying a petition to intervene, and/or request for hearing, or a request for access to the information described in paragraph (a) of this section, is appealable by the requestor/petitioner on the question as to whether the request and/or petition should have been granted.
( d ) An order granting a petition to intervene, and/or request for hearing, or granting a request for access to the information described in paragraph (a) of this section, is appealable by a party other than the requestor/petitioner on the question as to: ( 1 ) Whether the request for hearing or petition to intervene should have been wholly denied; or
( 2 ) Whether the request for access to the information described in paragraph (a)(3) of this section should have been denied in whole or in part. However, such a question with respect to SGI may only be appealed by the NRC staff, and such a question with respect to SUNSI may be appealed only by the NRC staff or by a party whose interest independent of the proceeding would be harmed by the release of the information.
( e ) An order selecting a hearing procedure may be appealed by any party on the question as to whether the selection of the particular hearing procedures was in clear contravention of the criteria set forth in § 2.310. The appeal must be filed with the Commission no later than ten (10) days after issuance of the order selecting a hearing procedure.
[73 FR 12631, Mar. 10, 2008, as amended at 77 FR 46592, Aug. 3, 2012; 78 FR 34247, June 7, 2013]
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:Annual performance budget**** 
2007| 2008
 
SuDocNumber:FHF1.1/2:
ItemNumber:0595-C-01(online)
CGPsystem Number:000595055
 
September 16, 2019**
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 17 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 1 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 17 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 2 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 17 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 3 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 17 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 4 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 17 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 5 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 17 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 6 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 17 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 7 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 17 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 8 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 17 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 9 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 17 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 10 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 17 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 11 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 17 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 12 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 17 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 13 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 17 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 14 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 17 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 15 of 15
|WELLS
    FARGO(logo) | Commercial
    Mortgage ServicingD1050-084, 8th Floor
401 South Tryon St.
Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334
|--------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE



Reference is hereby made to that
certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2012, by and among Citigroup Commercial Mortgages Securities Inc.,
as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National
Association, as Special Servicer, Situs Holdings, LLC, as Operating Advisor, Citibank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator and U.S.
Bank National Association, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series CGCMT 2012-GC8 (the
“Agreement”). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.



Pursuant to Section 10.08 of this Agreement, I, Daniel
Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the
Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its
performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based
on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout
the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate
as of the 28th day of February 2018.



/s/ Daniel Bober



---

Daniel Bober

Executive
Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank







Together we’ll
go far

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
#### § 981.52 Holding requirement and delivery.

Each handler shall, at all times, hold in his possession or under his control, in proper storage for the account of the Board, the quantity of almonds necessary to meet his reserve obligation less: (a) Any quantity which was disposed of by him pursuant to § 981.67; and (b) any quantity for which he is otherwise relieved by the Board of responsibility to so hold almonds. Upon demand of the Board reserve almonds shall be delivered to the Board f.o.b. handler's warehouse or point of storage, except that the Board shall not make such demand upon a handler with respect to reserve almonds for which he has agreed to undertake disposition pursuant to § 981.67. Any handler who does not act as agent for the Board in the disposition of reserve almonds shall be subject to the applicable inspection and certification requirements prescribed by the Board pursuant to § 981.67.

[41 FR 26853, June 30, 1976]
Exhibit 31.1 

 

**Citizens Financial Corp.**

**Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Robert J. Schoonover, President and Chief Executive Officer of Citizens Financial Corp., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Citizens Financial Corp; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results in operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 13, 2003
#### § 993.27 Eligibility.

Producer members of the Committee shall be at the time of their selection, and during their term of office, producers in the group, for which selected and if to represent a district also producers in the district for which selected, and, except for producer members representing cooperative producers, shall not be engaged in the handling of prunes either in a proprietary capacity or as a director, officer, or employee. Handler members of the Committee shall be handlers in the group they represent or directors, officers, or employees of such handlers. These eligibility requirements shall not apply to the public member and alternate member.

[46 FR 61636, Dec. 30, 1981]
§ 1050.201 Policy against accepting foreign gifts or decorations. ( a ) The Constitution of the United States, Article I, section 9, clause 8, provides that “* * * no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under * * * [the United States], shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any * * * foreign State.” In the Foreign Gifts and Decorations Act the Congress consented to the acceptance by Federal employees of gifts and decorations with certain constraints and under certain procedures. Acceptance of any gift or decoration not consistent with this Act, the Department of Energy Organization Act, or the regulations in this part is prohibited.
( b ) No employee shall request or otherwise encourage the tender of a gift or decoration from a foreign government. No employee shall accept a gift or decoration from a foreign government except as provided in §§ 1050.202 or 1050.203 of this part and in accordance with the additional procedures set forth in §§ 1050.204 and 1050.301 of this part.