alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ANNALEI AVANCEÑA

ADVISOR – REGULATORY AFFAIRS

PHONE/FAX: 

E-MAIL: 

(312) 997-8349 

ANNALEI.AVANCENA@UNITED.COM

 

December 29, 2009 

Linda Lundell 

U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Re: United Airlines Application for Streamlined and Consolidated 

U.S.-Mexico Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity, 

 dated December 4, 2009, Docket DOT-OST-2005-22228--CORRECTION

Dear Ms. Lundell: 

 Please note the following correction with respect to the listing of points beyond 

Mexico City on page 3 of the Appendix to United’s above-referenced application. The 

point named as Barranquilla, Brazil should be named as Barranquilla, Colombia. For 

ease of reference, attached is a corrected copy of the Appendix with this change 

highlighted. 

 A copy of this letter and the corrected Appendix will be filed electronically at 

regulations.gov and served on all persons on the attached Service List 

Respectfully submitted, 

Annalei Avanceña 

Advisor—Regulatory Affairs 

cc: Service List 

 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have this date served a copy of the foregoing document on 

all persons named below by causing a copy to be sent via email: 

byerlyjr@state.gov

carl.nelson@aa.com

charters@evergreenaviation.com

donna.kooperstein@usdoj.gov

dvaughan@kelleydrye.com (UPS) 

dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil

hkamen@coair.com

howard_kass@usairways.com

jhill@dowlohnes.com (JetBlue) 

john.allen@faa.gov

kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com

nssparks@fedex.com

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

matwood@sherblackwell.com (Kalitta) 

Annalei Avanceña 

Advisor—Regulatory Affairs 

Dated: December 29, 2009 
Corrected Appendix

United’s U.S.-Mexico Exemption/Certificate Authorities

(Direct Service beyond Mexico City) 

Pursuant to its Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for Route 566 last 

reissued by Order 2000-5-31 in Docket DOT-OST-1999-5856, United is authorized to 

serve certain points beyond Mexico City in conjunction with the company’s Los AngelesMexico City service. By the same Certificate, United is authorized to combine its route 

segment for Washington, D.C.-Mexico City/Toluca with its Los Angeles-Mexico City 

segment to serve these beyond points. 

Los Angeles &/or Washington via Mexico City to/from: 

Barranquilla, Colombia 

Belem, Brazil 

Brasilia, Brazil 

Buenos Aires, Argentina 

Caracas, Venezuela 

Georgetown, Guyana 

Guatemala City, Guatemala 

Managua, Nicaragua 

Maracaibo, Venezuela 

Montevideo, Uruguay 

Panama City, Panama 

Paramaribo, Suriname 

Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago 

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 

San Jose, Costa Rica 

San Salvador, El Salvador 

Sao Paulo, Brazil 

Tegucigalpa, Honduras
#### § 97.600 Administrative provisions.

Any proceedings instituted under section 128 of the Act for false marking shall be conducted in accordance with §§ 202.10 through 202.29 of this chapter (rules of practice under the Federal Seed Act) (7 U.S.C. 1551 *et seq.*), except that all references in those rules and regulations to “Examiner” shall be construed to be an Administrative Law Judge, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and not an “Examiner” as defined in the regulations under the Plant Variety Protection Act.
Case 3:06-cr-00199-MEF-CSC Document 4 Filed 08/15/2006 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>  5


<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                           JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                     839,281
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                            6,368,466
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                              9,318,560
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        17,229,148
<PP&E>                                   9,522,988
<DEPRECIATION>                           4,358,925
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          25,424,411
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   10,228,822
<BONDS>                                  2,723,372
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                    53,001
<OTHER-SE>                               9,153,452
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            25,424,411
<SALES>                                 20,291,787
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        20,330,176
<CGS>                                   18,019,367
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           18,019,367
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         2,052,197
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         342,803
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (84,191)
<INCOME-TAX>                                62,432
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (146,623)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                              (146,623)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.03)
<FN>
<F1>Accounts receivable are net of allowance of $49,000 at June 30, 1999.
<F2>Inventories are net of reserve of $634,000 at June 30, 1999.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit 15.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8
No. 333-190918; Form S-8 No. 333-212441) of securities to be offered to employees in employee benefit plans of Qiwi plc
of our report dated March 28, 2018, relating to the financial statements of QIWI plc and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of QIWI plc, included in this Annual Report on Form
20-F of QIWI plc for the year ended December 31, 2017.



|                     
|---------------------
|/s/ Ernst & Young LLC

Moscow, Russia

March 28,
2018
Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 11 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 1 of 1
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. AP-76,109, AP-76,110, & AP-76,111

EX PARTE NORMAN KYLE TERRY, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. 007-1108-07-A, 007-1109-07-A, 007-1249-07-A

 IN THE 7th DISTRICT COURT

FROM SMITH COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex

parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted oftwo charges

of evading arrest, and failure to stop and render aid. He was sentenced to eighteen years’

imprisonment in each cause. 

Applicant contends, inter alia, that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance because

counsel he failed to timely file a notice of appeal. 
2

The trial court has determined, based upon the record, that Applicant is entitled to an out-oftime appeal. We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time

appeal of the judgments of conviction in Cause Nos. 007-1108-07-A, 007-1109-07-A, 007-1249-07-

A from the 7th Judicial District Court of Smith County. Applicant is ordered returned to that time

at which he may give written notice of appeal so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain

a meaningful appeal. All time limits shall be calculated as if the sentence had been imposed on the

date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosecute

an appeal, he must take affirmative steps to file a written notice of appeal in the trial court within 30

days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Delivered: MARCH 11, 2009

Do Not Publish
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

BARBARA RICH, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. )Civil Action No. 1:06-cv-734-TFM

) [wo]

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, )

Acting Commissioner of Social Security, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered herewith, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner be and is

hereby REVERSED AND REMANDED to the Commissioner for further consideration and

proceedings consistent with the memorandum opinion entered herewith.

Done this 26 day of February, 2007. th

 /s/Terry F. Moorer 

TERRY F. MOORER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00734-TFM Document 21 Filed 02/26/07 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

In the Matter of the Extradition of )

)

)

MARIA del ROSARIO MORENO-VAZQUEZ ) CIV. NO. 3:06cv761-CSC

a/k/a MARIA COONLEY )

CERTIFICATE OF EXTRADITABILITY

and

ORDER FOR COMMITMENT

__________________________________________________

Upon completion of an evidentiary hearing and all other proceedings required by 18

U.S.C. § 3184, and based on the court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law contained

in the memorandum opinion entered herewith, the court concludes that there is sufficient

evidence to sustain the charge of trafficking in minors violation of Article 366-quáter in

relation to Article 366-ter of the Federal Penal Code of Mexico. Therefore, it is hereby

CERTIFIED to the Secretary of State for the United States of America that the

evidence of criminality is sufficient, under the provisions of the Extradition Treaty between

the United States and Mexico, May 4, 1978, T.I.A.S. No. 9656, 31 U.S.T. 5059, to sustain

the charge of trafficking in minors brought by the United Mexican States against Maria del

Rosario Moreno-Vazquez a/k/a Maria Coonley. Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED as follows:

1. That a certified copy of this Certificate of Extraditability, together with a copy

of all testimony and documents taken before this Court, be delivered by the Clerk of the

Court to the United States Attorney for the Middle District of Alabama for transmission to

Case 3:06-cv-00761-CSC Document 49 Filed 08/22/2008 Page 1 of 2
the appropriate government authorities including the Secretary of State of the United States

of America so that a final decision regarding extradition may be made.

2. That, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3184 which requires the court to issue a warrant

for the commitment of Maria del Rosario Moreno-Vazquez to the proper jail:

a. the court’s order setting conditions of release dated December 22, 2005 (doc.#

5, att. # 3) be and is hereby VACATED effective August 26, 2008 at 12:00

noon.

b. Maria del Rosario Moreno-Vazquez shall surrender herself to the United States

Marshal for the Middle District of Alabama on or before 12:00 noon on

August 26, 2008, to be confined in the appropriate facilities and to remain

until she is surrendered to a duly qualified agent of Mexico pursuant to the

applicable provisions of Treaty and law, or until further order of the court or

from the Secretary of State of the United States of America.

Done this 22nd day of August, 2008.

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00761-CSC Document 49 Filed 08/22/2008 Page 2 of 2
Subpart 2819.5 - Set-Asides for Small

Business

Parent topic: PART 2819 - SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS

2819.505 Rejecting Small Business Administration

recommendations.

The SPE is the agency head for the purposes of FAR 19.505.
§ 110.11 Export of IAEA safeguards samples. ( a ) A person is exempt from the requirements for a license to export special nuclear, source, and byproduct material set forth in sections 53, 54d, 64, 81 and 82 of the Atomic Energy Act and from the regulations in this part to the extent that the person exports special nuclear, source, or byproduct material in IAEA safeguards samples. The samples must be exported in accordance with § 75.8 of this chapter, or a comparable U.S. Department of Energy order, and: ( 1 ) For special nuclear material, be in quantities not exceeding a combined total of 100 grams of contained plutonium, uranium-233, and uranium-235 per facility per year;
( 2 ) For source material, be in quantities not exceeding 5 kilograms per facility per year; and
( 3 ) For byproduct material, be in quantities not exceeding the values in § 30.71 of this chapter per shipment.
( b ) This exemption does not relieve any person from complying with parts 71 or 73 of this chapter or any Commission order under section 201(a) of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5841(a)).
[77 FR 27114, May 9, 2012]
#### § 966.112 Terms.

Terms used in this subpart shall have the same meaning as when used in the marketing agreement and order.
Danny Jordan, Third District, President 

Sammy Coffey, Second District, Vice-Pres. 

Dwight Pickens, First District 

Randy Owen, Fourth District 

Benny Rakestraw, Fifth District 

Mr. Dennis DeVany 

Union County 

Board of Supervisors 

POST OFFICE BOX 847 

NEW ALBANY, MISSISSIPPI 38652 

(662) 534-1902 

April 30, 2012 

Chief, EAS & Domestic Analysis Division 

Office of Aviation 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

RE: Tupelo Regional Airport (TUP) 

Docket DOT -OST -2009-0305 

Our File No.: 51.00 

Dear Ms. DeVany: 

Annette M. Hickey, Clerk 

Terry Johnson, Administrator 

Thad J. Mueller, Attorney 

C) 

.C' 

On behalf of the Board of Supe~isors of Union County, Mississippi, 1 write in support p;f Silver 

Airways service option 1 into the Atlanta airport. It is Qur understanding that since the City of 

Tupelo has been a recipient of the Essential Airport Service Program, the Tupelo airport has 

experienced reductions in flight, excessive late flights and cancellations with the current servicer. 

Silver Airways' proposed flights into Atlanta benefits our local businesses, including those in 

Union County, because of increased options available from other carriers who will offer a greater 

number of flights to a wider variety of destinations. 

.·' 

~dditional reduction i.1,1 Tupelo'.s airline service resulting from,smaller aircraft, no baggage ., 

transfer, repeated scre,ening, and difficult boarding pass procedures will senre to discouragt? .us .. and our clients from using Tupelo's airport. . . . . · · . '· ·· · . 

i , I • < 

We ask that you give strong consideration to Silver Airways service option 1 over Air Choice 

One. ~ !"! • , 

ION COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
#### § 140.51 Scope.

This subpart applies only to persons found by the Commission to be Federal agencies, which have applied for or are holders of licenses issued pursuant to [part 50 of this chapter](/on/2024-09-17/title-10/part-50) authorizing operation of nuclear reactors.

Note:

Federal agencies are not required to furnish financial protection.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

Exhibit No. 27
ENCORE COMPUTER CORPORATION
Financial Data Schedule
(in thousands except per share data)
For the three months ended March 30, 1997

 Cash and cash items                                   5,006
 Marketable securities                                     0
 Notes and accounts receivable-trade                  10,997
 Allowances for doubtful accounts                       -759
 Inventory                                            12,100
 Total current assets                                 28,134
 Property, plant and equipment                        82,002
 Accumulated depreciation                            -49,823
 Total assets                                         61,866
 Total current liabilities                            74,334
 Bonds, mortgages and similar debt                       612
 Preferred stock no mandatory redemption                  49
 Common stock                                            373
 Other shrhldrs' eq (Cap'l deficiency)               -14,590
 Total liabilities & equity                           61,866
 Sales of tangible products                            4,183
 Total revenues                                        8,333
 Cost of tangible goods sold                           7,176
 Total costs applicable to revenues                   11,445
 Other costs and expenses                                663
 Provision for doubtful accounts and notes               159
 Interest and amortization of debt discount            1,370
 Loss before taxes                                   -20,052
 Income tax expense                                      -29
 Net loss                                            -20,023
 Earnings per share-primary                            -0.60
 Earnings per share-fully diluted                      -0.10





</TABLE>
1847.7001 Contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 1852.247–71, Protection of the Florida Manatee, in

solicitations and contracts when deliveries or vessel operations, dockside work, or disassembly

functions under the contract will involve use of waterways inhabited by manatees. The clause shall

also be included in applicable subcontracts (including vendor deliveries).

Parent topic: Subpart 1847.70—Protection of the Florida Manatee
Case 2:06-cr-00193-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 07/24/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cr-00193-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 07/24/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cr-00193-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 07/24/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cr-00193-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 07/24/2006 Page 4 of 4
April 

### I@, 2013



### US. Department 

### of Transportation 1200

### New 

## JerseyAvenue, S.E. Washington, D.C 20590

To whom it

### may concern 

### Subject: Tunisair

### is supporting 

### IATA's filing 

### of resolution 

### 787
We are 

### delighted 

### to inform 

### you that 

### Tunisair, the 

### National airline 

### of Tunisia, 

### supports the 

### Resolullon 787 of IATA 

### aiming to 

### allow airline industry to 

### work together to 

### build new distribution capabilities (NDC). We 

### are following closely 

### this issue with IATA and we 

### are 

### confident that, 

### once achieved, 

### the 

### new model will 

### give Tunisair 

### the opportunity to present 

### via the 

### target XML common 

### interface, its 

### offern in a 

### manner in 

### which we 

### want them 

### presented to customers via indirect channels (Travel Agencies, GDSs,

# . .

# .).It wijl 

### also

### result in faster

### time to market with our

### new

### products and

### services 

### and 

### serve also 

### to lower 

### our distrjbutjon costs via the 

### GDSs which are 

### still 

### inmsing more and 

### more. 

### In conclusion, New Distribution Capabilities

### are going to give 

### us the capability to identify 

### our customers, differentiate our 

### tailored products and 

### create jncreased consumer choices. 

# '.
Yours sincerely, 

### Khaled 

### Che Deputy 

### General

## ido or Tun is



### air Adraport Tunis-Carthage-2035 Wed.chellv@tunisair~~tn
173193.1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

JAMES KUCZMASKI, ADAM PIKE, ) 

RYAN PHILLIPS, JOSH STONE, ) 

SUHANE LOWERY, KEVIN BELL, and ) 

HAMP CRUM, III, individually and on ) 

behalf of all other persons similarly ) 

situated, ) 

) 

Plaintiffs, ) Civil Action No. 2:06-cv-731 

) 

v. ) 

) 

US FOODSERVICE, ) 

) 

Defendant. ) 

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, defendant U.S. 

Foodservice, Inc.submitsthe following Disclosure Statement. U.S. Foodservice, Inc. 

is a wholly-owned, indirect subsidiary of Koninklijke Ahold NV (“Ahold”). U.S. 

Foodservice, Inc. is not a publicly traded company. It is an affiliated subsidiary of 

Ahold, a publicly traded company. Ahold’s shares are listed in Amsterdam and as 

ADRs on the New York Stock Exchange ("AHO"). 

Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 29 Filed 03/30/2007 Page 1 of 3
173193.1 2 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 /s/ Tammy L. Baker 

 Tammy L. Baker, ASB-9522-B62T 

 E-Mail: tbaker@constangy.com

 Direct Dial: 205-226-5466 

 Tamula R. Yelling, ASB-9447-E61T 

 E-Mail: tyelling@constangy.com 

 Direct Dial: 205-226-5471 

 CONSTANGY, BROOKS & SMITH, LLC 

 One Federal Place, Suite 900 

 1819 Fifth Avenue North 

 Birmingham, Alabama 35203 

 Facsimile: 205-323-7674 

 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT 

 U.S. FOODSERVICE, INC. 

Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 29 Filed 03/30/2007 Page 2 of 3
173193.1 3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on March 30, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing with 

the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which willsend notification ofsuch 

filing to the following: 

Gregory O. Wiggins, Esq. 

WIGGINS, CHILDS, QUINN & PANTAZIS, LLC 

The Kress Building 

301 19th Street North 

Birmingham, Alabama 35203 

Tucker F. Burge, Esq. 

BURGE & BURGE 

850 Park Place Tower 

2001 Park Place North 

Birmingham, Alabama 35203 

 /s/ Tammy L. Baker 

 Counsel of Record 

Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 29 Filed 03/30/2007 Page 3 of 3
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 2.1119 Applicability of other sections.

In proceedings subject to this part, the provisions of subparts A, C, and L of this part are also applicable, except where inconsistent with the provisions of this subpart.

[69 FR 2267, Jan. 14, 2004]
#### § 986.80 Certification of reports.

All reports submitted to the Council as required in this part shall be certified to the Secretary and the Council as to the completeness and correctness of the information contained therein.
Case 2:06-cv-00725-MHT-CSC Document 11 Filed 08/31/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00725-MHT-CSC Document 11 Filed 08/31/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00725-MHT-CSC Document 11 Filed 08/31/2006 Page 3 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00725-MHT-CSC Document 11-2 Filed 08/31/2006 Page 1 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00725-MHT-CSC Document 11-2 Filed 08/31/2006 Page 2 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00725-MHT-CSC Document 11-2 Filed 08/31/2006 Page 3 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00725-MHT-CSC Document 11-2 Filed 08/31/2006 Page 4 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00725-MHT-CSC Document 11-2 Filed 08/31/2006 Page 5 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00725-MHT-CSC Document 11-2 Filed 08/31/2006 Page 6 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00725-MHT-CSC Document 11-2 Filed 08/31/2006 Page 7 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00725-MHT-CSC Document 11-2 Filed 08/31/2006 Page 8 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00725-MHT-CSC Document 11-2 Filed 08/31/2006 Page 9 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00725-MHT-CSC Document 11-2 Filed 08/31/2006 Page 10 of 10
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) CR. NO. 2:06cr198-WKW

)

RONALD MCQUEEN )

ORDER

Pursuant to the defendant’s Notice of Intent to Change Plea (doc. # 39) filed on

December 21, 2006, and for good cause, it is

ORDERED that the defendant’s change of plea hearing be and is hereby set for

December 28, 2006, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 4B, United States Courthouse Complex,

One Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a court reporter for this proceeding. If the defendant

is in custody, the United States Marshal or the person having custody of the defendant shall

produce the defendant for the proceeding.

Done this 21 day of December, 2006. st

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00198-WKW-CSC Document 40 Filed 12/21/2006 Page 1 of 1