alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Greene County
Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2004 (the "Report"), I, R. Stan Puckett, Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                  /s/ R. Stan Puckett
                                  --------------------------
                                      R. Stan Puckett
                                      Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
                                      Officer


Date:  May 7, 2004
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. MARTHA FENCHAK BELL, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 396 WAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 16th day of December, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 43 Filed 04/25/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 43 Filed 04/25/2007 Page 2 of 2
Press Office 

 U.S. Department of Homeland Security 

Fact Sheet June 30, 2006 (revised) 

USCIS ISSUES CITIZENSHIP AND NATURALIZATION FACTS 

Highlights July 4th Week “Celebrate Citizenship, Celebrate America” Naturalization Ceremonies

• United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) will welcome 18,000 new citizens 

during July 4th week (June 27-July 7). On the Fourth of July alone, the agency will welcome more 

than 1,500 new United States citizens at ceremonies across the country. 

• Since President George W. Bush signed the Expedited Naturalization Executive Order on July 3, 

2002, USCIS has naturalized more than 24,000 service members. In all, more than 35,000 service 

members have filed for expedited naturalization. 

• During fiscal years 2004 and 2005, more than 7,500 and 6,000 service members became United 

States Citizens, respectively. 

• In October 2004, USCIS began hosting the first overseas military naturalization ceremonies since the 

Korean War. During fiscal year 2005, 1,006 service members became Citizens while serving on 

active duty outside of the United States. 

• There are currently more than 40,000 members of the U.S. military who are eligible to apply for 

naturalization.

• Approximately 11.3 million naturalized citizens live in the United States. 

• Nearly eight million immigrants living in the United States are eligible for naturalization. 

• During fiscal year 2005, USCIS welcomed more than 600,000 new citizens. 

• Sixty-five percent of all new citizens naturalized during FY 2004 (537,151) call California, New 

York, Florida, Texas, Illinois, or New Jersey home. 

• More than half (fifty-four percent) of all new citizens naturalized during FY 2004 were women. 

• Asia is the leading region of birth among persons naturalizing. Forty percent of new citizens 

naturalized during FY 2004 were born in Asian countries. 

• Home to more than 63,830 new citizens, Mexico is the leading country of birth among persons who 

naturalized during FY 2004. 

www.uscis.gov 
• USCIS’ Office of Citizenship recently introduced a New Immigrant Orientation Guide, Civics Flash 

Cards and other free tools to help applicants prepare for citizenship. These materials are available at 

http://uscis.gov/graphics/citizenship. 

• USCIS has also created a web page entitled “Faces of America” which highlights the stories of newly 

naturalized U.S. citizens at http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/publicaffairs/faces.htm

– USCIS –

 www.uscis.gov
Case 2:06-cr-00209-MHT-CSC Document 6 Filed 09/05/2006 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) Cr. No. 3:06cr210-MEF

)

MELISSA WARD )

DEFENDANT WARD’S NOTICE OF INTENT TO CHANGE PLEA

Defendant Ward hereby notifies the Court and Counsel that she intends to accept

the Plea Bargain agreement proferred by the United States Attorney, and gives notice that

she intends to change her plea to guilty. 

Respectfully submitted this the 16 day of November, 2006. th

/s/ C.E. Vercelli, Jr. 

Charles E. Vercelli, Jr. (ASB-6085-V82C)

Attorney for Defendant Ward

OF COUNSEL:

Charles E. Vercelli, Jr. 

VERCELLI & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

1019 S. Perry Street

Montgomery, AL 36104-5049

Tel: (334) 834-8805

Fax: (334) 834-8807

cvercelli@vercelli-law.com

Case 3:06-cr-00210-MEF-CSC Document 17 Filed 11/16/2006 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on November 16, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing

motion with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification

of the filing of this Motion to the following:

Chris Snyder

Assistant United States Attorney

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, AL 36104

/s/ C.E. Vercelli, Jr. 

Of Counsel

519-06\Notice of Intent Change Plea.1.wpd

Case 3:06-cr-00210-MEF-CSC Document 17 Filed 11/16/2006 Page 2 of 2
§ 1022.1 Background. ( a ) Executive Order (E.O.) 11988—Floodplain Management (May 24, 1977) directs each Federal agency to issue or amend existing regulations and procedures to ensure that the potential effects of any action it may take in a floodplain are evaluated and that its planning programs and budget requests reflect consideration of flood hazards and floodplain management. Guidance for implementation of the E.O. is provided in the floodplain management guidelines of the U.S. Water Resources Council (40 FR 6030; February 10, 1978) and in “A Unified National Program for Floodplain Management” prepared by the Federal Interagency Floodplain Management Taskforce (Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA 248, June 1994). E.O. 11990—Protection of Wetlands (May 24, 1977) directs all Federal agencies to issue or amend existing procedures to ensure consideration of wetlands protection in decisionmaking and to ensure the evaluation of the potential impacts of any new construction proposed in a wetland.
( b ) It is the intent of the E.O.s that Federal agencies implement both the floodplain and the wetland provisions through existing procedures such as those established to implement the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 *et seq.*). In those instances where the impacts of the proposed action are not significant enough to require the preparation of an EIS under section 102(2)(C) of NEPA, alternative floodplain or wetland evaluation procedures are to be established. As stated in the E.O.s, Federal agencies are to avoid direct or indirect support of development in a floodplain or new construction in a wetland wherever there is a practicable alternative.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

EASTERN DIVISION 

ANGELA PRICE, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

ROANOKE CITY BOARD OF 

EDUCATION, 

 Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CIVIL ACTION NUMBER: 

3:06-cv-742-MEF 

DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO SHOW CAUSE

TO

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT

Comes now the Defendant to respond to the Order of this Court dated 

March 27, 2007 to show cause why Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend should not be 

granted; and in support thereof states: 

1. While Defendant does not agree with the assertions set forth in 

Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint, Defendant does not assert legal grounds while 

Plaintiff’s motion should not be granted. 

Case 3:06-cv-00742-MEF-WC Document 12 Filed 04/06/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

 s/Donald B. Sweeney, Jr. 

Donald B. Sweeney, Jr. (SWE002) 

OF COUNSEL

Bradley Arant Rose & White LLP

One Federal Place 

1819 Fifth Avenue North 

Birmingham, AL 35203-2104 

Telephone: (205) 521-8000 

Facsimile: (205) 521-8800 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on April 6, 2007, I electronically filed the 

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send 

notification of such filing to the following: 

Adam M. Porter, Esq. 

2301 Morris Avenue, Suite 102 

Birmingham, AL 35203 

and I hereby certify that I have mailed by United States Postal Service the 

document to the following non-CM/ECF participants: 

None 

Respectfully submitted, 

s/ Donald B. Sweeney, Jr. 

Donald B. Sweeney, Jr. (asb-3803-277d)

Bradley Arant Rose & White LLP

One Federal Place 

1819 Fifth Avenue North 

Birmingham, AL 35203-2104 

Telephone: (205) 521-8000 

Facsimile: (205) 521-8800 

E-mail: dsweeney@bradleyarant.com 

Case 3:06-cv-00742-MEF-WC Document 12 Filed 04/06/2007 Page 2 of 2
REMOTE ONE 

R1ghr Conrrol 

IMBAUCAMERA SIGN
2007-2213.

#### Fife v. Greene Cty. Bd. of Revision.

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2006-V-783.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

TOMMY LEE WILSON, #225500, )

)

 Petitioner, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06-CV-751-WKW

)

RALPH HOOKS, et al., )

)

 Respondents. )

ORDER ON MOTION

Upon consideration of the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by

the petitioner (Court Doc. No. 2), and for good cause, it is

ORDERED that this motion be and is hereby GRANTED. 

Done this 25th day of August, 2006. 

/s/ Delores R. Boyd

DELORES R. BOYD

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 3:06-cv-00751-WKW-TFM Document 3 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

 

I, Erin M. Rohde, certify that:

 

(a)                       A review of the Servicer’s activities and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement during the period from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 has been made under my supervision.

 

(b)                       To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.

 

 
| Dated March 17, 2015 |                                  |
|---------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                      |                                  |
|                      | /s/  Erin M. Rohde               |
|                      | Erin M. Rohde                         |
|                      | Assistant Treasurer of                |
|                      | Ford Motor Credit Company LLC,        |
|                      | as Servicer of Ford Credit Auto Owner |
|                      | Trust 2012-D                          |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  5
<MULTIPLIER>      1
       
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        6-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                       JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                         JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                               267,082
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        2,789
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     310,767
<PP&E>                                               9,807,181
<DEPRECIATION>                                       2,621,905
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       7,493,083
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                140,601
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           7,368,244
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         7,493,083
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     715,706
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        476,611
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      239,095
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  239,095
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         239,094
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        21.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        21.42
<FN>
The  earnings  per share data  noted  above  refers to net  income  per  limited
partnership unit.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 1 Filed 07/13/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 1 Filed 07/13/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 1 Filed 07/13/2006 Page 3 of 3
#### § 958.45 Accounting of funds upon termination of the order.

Any funds collected as assessments pursuant to this subpart and remaining unexpended in the possession of the committee after termination of this part shall be distributed in such manner as the Secretary may direct: *Provided,* That to the extent practical, such funds shall be returned pro rata to the persons from whom such funds were collected.

[32 FR 11262, Aug. 3, 1967]
89–008

106TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 106–991

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF S. 2796, THE WATER

RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 2000

OCTOBER 18, 2000.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mr. GOSS, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 639]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 639, by nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration in the House of S. 2796,

the Water Resources Development Act of 2000, under a closed rule.

The rule waives all points of order against consideration of the bill.

The rule provides for one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. The rule provides

that the amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in the

Congressional Record and numbered 2 be considered as adopted.

The rule further provides for one motion to recommit with or without instructions. Finally, the rule provides that should the Senate

bill, as amended, pass the House, it shall then be in order to move

that the House insist on its amendment to S. 2796 and request a

conference with the Senate thereon.

SUMMARY OF AMENDMENT CONSIDERED AS ADOPTED UNDER THE

RULE

(Derived from amendment summary provided by amendment sponsor)

Shuster/Oberstar: Amendment in the nature of a substitute,

printed in the Congressional Record and numbered 2. Approves the

Comprehensive Restoration of the Everglades Plan as a concept,

and authorizes the first increment based on the Senate-passed Everglades provision with minor amendments. Authorizes two water

2

resource development projects that have received favorable review

by the Army Corps of Engineers. Authorizes 26 water resources development projects subject to completion of a favorable review by

the Army Corps of Engineers by December 31, 2000. Modifies existing water resources projects to reflect changed conditions. Modifies

existing policies governing the water resources program of the

Army Corps of Engineers. Authorizes feasibility studies for prospective water resources projects. Modifies existing authorities and directives of the Army Corps of Engineers to reform existing policies

and procedures. Provides for an independent peer review pilot program; enhanced public participation in feasibility studies; monitoring of completed projects; and mitigation of environmental impacts. Authorizes and modifies environmental restoration and environmental infrastructure projects and programs for: Calfed Bay

Delta program; Lower Columbia River estuary program; San Gabriel Basin; Illinois River Basin; Ohio River Basin; Puget Sound;

Missouri River; and Mississippi River. The total cost of the amendment in the nature of a substitute (federal+nonfederal) is $6 billion.

Æ
1606.001 Applicability.       FAR part 6 has no practical application to FEHBP contracts in view of the statutory exception provided by 5 U.S.C. 8902.    **Parent topic:** PART 1606—COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS
# Subpart 2812.3 - Solicitation Provisions and Contract Clauses for the Acquisition of Commercial Items

**Parent topic:**PART 2812 - ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL ITEMS

## 2812.301 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses for the acquisition of commercial items.

Contracting officers shall include the provisions and clauses at JAR 2852.212-4 in all solicitations and contracts for the acquisition of commercial items that require FAR 52.212-4, Contract Terms and Conditions - Commercial Items.     

## 2812.302 Tailoring of provisions and clauses for the acquisition of commercial items.

The HCA, or designee at a level at or above the BPC, is authorized to approve the contracting officer's request for waiver for an individual contract action submitted under FAR 12.302(c). The SPE is authorized to approve the contracting officer's request for wavier for a class of contracts submitted under FAR 12.302(c).
#### § 956.27 Failure to nominate.

If nominations are not made within the time and manner prescribed in § 956.22 the Secretary may, without regard to nominations, select the members and alternates on the basis of the representation provided for in § 956.20.
| (logo) plante moran | **Plante & Moran, PLLC**

10 South Riverside Plaza

9th floor

Chicago, IL 60606

Tel: 312.207.1040

Fax: 312.207.1066

plantemoran.com |
|---------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Report of Independent RegisteredPublic Accounting Firm

 

 

To the Board of Directors

National Tax Search, LLC

 

We have examined National TaxSearch, LLC’s (the “Company”) compliance with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, set forth inItem 1122(d) of the Security and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB forthe National Tax Search TaxQ system (the “Platform”) as of and forthe year ended December 31, 2016. The Company has determined that only certainservicing criteria, 1122(d)(l)(ii), 1122(d)1(iv), 1122(d)2(ii), 1122(d)2(v),1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii), are applicable to theactivities performed by it with respect to the Platform covered by this report.The Company has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth inItem 1122(d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activitiesperformed by it with respect to the Platform covered by this report.

 

Management is responsible for theCompany's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is toexpress an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliancewith the servicing criteria based on our examination. Our examination wasconducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in thecircumstances. Our examination included a selection of a sample of transactionsand compliance activities related to the Platform during the examination periodand determining whether the Company processed those transactions and performedthose activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Our testing ofselected transactions and compliance activities was limited to calculations,reports, and activities performed by the Company during the period covered bythis report. Our procedures did not include determining whether errors may haveoccurred prior to our tests that may have affected the balances or amountscalculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this reportfor the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that ourexamination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination doesnot provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with theservicing criteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementionedservicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 for thePlatform is fairly stated in all material respects.

 

 

/s/ Plante & Moran, PLLC

 

Chicago, IL

January 27, 2017

 

 

(logo) Praxity 

MEMBER

GLOBAL ALLIANCE OF 

INDEPENDENT FIRMS
Subpart 2813.2 - Actions at or Below the

Micro-Purchase Threshold

Parent topic: PART 2813 - SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES

2813.201 General.

The SPE is the agency head for the purposes of FAR 13.201(g)(1).
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1101 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                 House Calendar No. 250
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1101

                          [Report No. 109-724]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
  bill (H.R. 5682) to exempt from certain requirements of the Atomic 
 Energy Act of 1954 a proposed nuclear agreement for cooperation with 
                                 India.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 7, 2006

Mr. Bishop of Utah, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION



Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
  bill (H.R. 5682) to exempt from certain requirements of the Atomic 
 Energy Act of 1954 a proposed nuclear agreement for cooperation with 
                                 India.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
5682) to exempt from certain requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 
1954 a proposed nuclear agreement for cooperation with India. All 
points of order against the conference report and against its 
consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered as 
read.
                                                 House Calendar No. 250

109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 1101

                          [Report No. 109-724]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
  bill (H.R. 5682) to exempt from certain requirements of the Atomic 
 Energy Act of 1954 a proposed nuclear agreement for cooperation with 
                                 India.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            December 7, 2006

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`