UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   Form 10-QSB
(Mark One)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
    ACT OF 1934

                    For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003


[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
    ACT OF 1934


                For the transition period from _________to _________

                         Commission file number 0-14248


                              ANGELES PARTNERS XIV
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)



         California                                             95-3959771
(State or other jurisdiction of                              (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                             Identification No.)

                         55 Beattie Place, P.O. Box 1089
                        Greenville, South Carolina 29602
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

                                 (864) 239-1000
                           (Issuer's telephone number)


                         PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION


ITEM 1.     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



                              ANGELES PARTNERS XIV

              CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF NET LIABILITIES IN LIQUIDATION
                                   (Unaudited)
                                 (in thousands)

                                  June 30, 2003



Assets
  Cash and cash equivalents                               $   507
  Receivables and deposits                                     67
                                                              574
Liabilities
  Other liabilities                                            48
  Notes payable, in default                                 6,541
  Accrued interest, in default                              2,766
  Estimated costs during the period of liquidation             38
                                                            9,393

Net liabilities in liquidation                            $(8,819)


            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


<PAGE>






                              ANGELES PARTNERS XIV

        CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET LIABILITIES IN LIQUIDATION
                                   (Unaudited)
                                 (in thousands)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                  For the Six Months
                                                                     Ended June 30,
                                                                            2003

<S>                                                                 <C>
Net liabilities in liquidation at beginning of period               $  (8,182)

Changes in net liabilities in liquidation attributed to:
   Decrease in cash and cash equivalents                                 (563)
   Decrease in receivables and deposits                                  (194)
   Decrease in restricted escrows                                        (206)
   Decrease in other assets                                               (77)
   Decrease in investment properties                                  (32,654)
   Decrease in accounts payable                                            36
   Decrease in tenant security deposits                                   123
   Decrease in accrued property taxes                                     327
   Decrease in other liabilities                                          150
   Decrease in notes payable                                           22,022
   Decrease in accrued interest payable                                 7,578
   Decrease in due to affiliates                                        2,538
   Decrease in estimated costs during the period of
      liquidation                                                         283

Net liabilities in liquidation at end of period                      $ (8,819)


            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>

                              ANGELES PARTNERS XIV
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                                   (Unaudited)
                      (in thousands, except per unit data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
                                                   June 30, 2002       June 30, 2002
Revenues:
<S>                                                   <C>                 <C>
   Rental income                                      $ 1,271             $ 2,549
   Other income                                            66                 132
      Total revenues                                    1,337               2,681

Expenses:
   Operating                                              435                 893
   General and administrative                              62                 145
   Depreciation                                           360                 715
   Interest                                             1,035               1,863
   Property taxes                                         106                 210
      Total expenses                                    1,998               3,826

Net loss                                              $ (661)             $(1,145)

Net loss allocated to general partners (1%)            $ (7)               $ (11)

Net loss allocated to limited partners (99%)             (654)             (1,134)

                                                      $ (661)             $(1,145)

Net loss per limited partnership unit                 $(15.07)            $(26.12)



            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>


                              ANGELES PARTNERS XIV
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
                                   (Unaudited)
                                 (in thousands)

                                                                Six Months Ended
                                                                   June 30, 2002
Cash flows from operating activities:
  Net loss                                                          $(1,145)
  Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided
   by operating activities:
     Depreciation                                                       715
     Amortization of loan costs                                          11
     Change in accounts:
      Receivables and deposits                                         (264)
      Other assets                                                       27
      Accounts payable                                                  (40)
      Tenant security deposit liabilities                                (6)
      Accrued property taxes                                            210
      Accrued interest                                                  126
      Due to affiliates                                                 310
      Other liabilities                                                 114

        Net cash provided by operating activities                        58

Cash flows from investing activities:
  Property improvements and replacements                               (210)
  Net deposits to restricted escrows                                    (54)

        Net cash used in investing activities                          (264)

Cash flows from financing activities:
  Principal payments on notes payable                                  (177)
  Distribution to partners                                               (6)
        Net cash used in financing activities                          (183)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents                              (389)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period                      1,177
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                           $ 788

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
  Cash paid for interest                                            $ 1,488

At June 30,  2002 and  December  31,  2001,  approximately  $79,000 of  property
improvements and replacements were included in due to affiliates.


            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

                              ANGELES PARTNERS XIV
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                                   (Unaudited)


Note A - Basis of Presentation

As  of  December  31,  2002,   Angeles   Partners  XIV  (the   "Partnership"  or
"Registrant")  adopted the  liquidation  basis of accounting due to the imminent
loss of its two remaining investment properties.  Consequently, assets have been
valued at estimated net realizable  value and liabilities are presented at their
estimated settlement amounts, including estimated costs associated with carrying
out the liquidation of the Partnership.  The valuation of assets and liabilities
necessarily  requires many estimates and  assumptions  and there are substantial
uncertainties in carrying out the liquidation.  The actual realization of assets
and  settlement of liabilities  could be higher or lower than amounts  indicated
and is based upon the Managing General Partner's estimates as of the date of the
consolidated financial statements.

The Managing  General  Partner  estimates that the  liquidation  process will be
completed by September 30, 2003.  Because the success in  realization  of assets
and the  settlement of liabilities  is based on the Managing  General  Partner's
best estimates,  the liquidation  period may be shorter than projected or it may
be extended beyond the projected period.

The  Partnership   has  unsecured   working  capital  loans  in  the  amount  of
approximately   $4,576,000  plus  related  accrued   interest  of  approximately
$2,745,000  at June  30,  2003.  These  loans  are in  default  as a  result  of
non-payment  of interest and  principal  upon their  maturity in November  1997.
These loans were originally  payable to Angeles  Acceptance Pool, L.P.  ("AAP").
During the year ended December 31, 2000, AAP transferred  ownership of the loans
to Saticoy Investments  Company,  LLC ("Saticoy"),  a wholly owned entity of The
PNL  Companies.  During the year ended  December 31, 2002,  Saticoy  transferred
ownership of the loans to AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate of Angeles Realty
Corporation II ("ARC II" or the "Managing General  Partner").  This indebtedness
is recourse to the Partnership.

During the year ended December 31, 2001, the Managing  General  Partner signed a
forebearance  agreement  with Saticoy.  The Managing  General  Partner agreed to
market Waterford Square Apartments for sale. The forebearance  period began June
1, 2001 and was to end the earlier of March 1, 2002 or the date Waterford Square
Apartments  was sold.  The  Managing  General  Partner  and  Saticoy  negotiated
extensions of the  forebearance  agreement  until July 1, 2002, at which time it
expired.  The Partnership  sold Waterford  Square  Apartments on March 31, 2003.
After  deducting for closing  costs, a portion of the sale proceeds were used to
repay the first lien mortgage debt on the property.

In addition the Partnership had two additional  notes which were recourse to the
Partnership and were owed to Angeles  Mortgage  Investment  Trust  ("AMIT"),  an
affiliate of the Managing General Partner. One of the two notes with a principal
balance  of  approximately  $2,405,000  originally  matured in March  1998.  The
Managing  General Partner  negotiated with the holder of the note to extend this
indebtedness  through  March 2002.  As a result of the sale of Waterford  Square
Apartments,  this  indebtedness,  including  accrued  interest of  approximately
$592,000, was fully repaid during the six months ended June 30, 2003.

The remaining  AMIT note with a principal  balance of  approximately  $4,765,000
matured on March 1, 2003 and was in default due to non-payment. Accrued interest
on this note was approximately $5,792,000 at March 25, 2003. An affiliate of the
Managing General Partner obtained a judgment against the Partnership in December
2002.  An  affiliate  of  the  Managing   General  Partner  had  also  initiated
foreclosure  proceedings  against Fox Crest Apartments,  the Partnership's other
investment property, and on March 25, 2003, the judgment against the Partnership
became final, and AIMCO became the owner of all beneficial interest in Fox Crest
Apartments. As a result, approximately $4,970,000 of accrued interest related to
the remaining AMIT note and approximately $1,592,000 of accrued interest related
to the unsecured  working capital loans was  extinguished  during the six months
ended June 30,  2003.  As a result of the sale of Waterford  Square  Apartments,
approximately  $2,800,000  of principal  and  approximately  $873,000 of accrued
interest  related to the  remaining  AMIT debt,  and  approximately  $100,000 of
accrued  interest  related to the  unsecured  working  capital  loans was repaid
during the six months  ended June 30, 2003.  As of June 30, 2003,  approximately
$1,965,000  of  principal  and  approximately  $21,000 of accrued  interest  was
outstanding  on the  remaining  AMIT  note.  Subsequent  to June  30,  2003,  an
additional $350,000 of principal and accrued interest on the remaining AMIT note
was repaid with proceeds from the sale of Waterford Square Apartments.

Note B - Disposition of Investment Property

On March 31, 2003,  the  Partnership  sold  Waterford  Square  Apartments  to an
unrelated third party for a gross sales price of  $18,200,000.  The net proceeds
realized by the  Partnership  were  approximately  $6,395,000  after  payment of
closing costs and the first lien  mortgage debt on the property.  During the six
months ended June 30, 2003,  these proceeds were used to repay certain AMIT debt
and a portion of the unsecured working capital loans, see Note A.

Note C - Transactions with Affiliated Parties

The  Partnership  has no employees  and is  dependent  on the  Managing  General
Partner  and  its  affiliates  for  the  management  and  administration  of all
Partnership  activities.  The  Partnership  Agreement  provides  for (i) certain
payments to affiliates for services and (ii)  reimbursement  of certain expenses
incurred by affiliates on behalf of the Partnership.

As compensation for providing property  management  services,  affiliates of the
Managing  General  Partner were  entitled to receive 5% of gross  receipts  from
Foxcrest Apartments and 7.82% of gross receipts from Waterford Square Apartments
during the three  months  ended March 31, 2003 and the six months ended June 30,
2002. The Registrant paid to such affiliates  approximately $85,000 and $177,000
for the three  months  ended March 31, 2003 and six months  ended June 30, 2002,
respectively.

Affiliates   of  the  Managing   General   Partner  were   eligible  to  receive
reimbursements of accountable administrative expenses amounting to approximately
$49,000 and  $101,000  for the three  months ended March 31, 2003 and six months
ended June 30, 2002,  respectively.  As a result of the foreclosure on Fox Crest
Apartments,  approximately $2,342,000 in liabilities representing reimbursements
due to affiliates were extinguished.

The  Partnership  insured its properties up to certain  limits through  coverage
provided by AIMCO which is  generally  self-insured  for a portion of losses and
liabilities  related to workers  compensation,  property  casualty  and  vehicle
liability. The Partnership insured its properties above the AIMCO limits through
insurance  policies  obtained  by  AIMCO  from  insurers  unaffiliated  with the
Managing General Partner.  During 2002, the Partnership was charged by AIMCO and
its affiliates approximately $100,000 for insurance coverage and fees associated
with policy claims administration.

Note D - Legal Proceedings

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the  Partnership,  its Managing  General Partner and
several of their  affiliated  partnerships  and corporate  entities.  The action
purported  to  assert  claims  on  behalf  of a class of  limited  partners  and
derivatively  on behalf  of a number  of  limited  partnerships  (including  the
Partnership)  that are named as nominal  defendants,  challenging,  among  other
things,  the  acquisition  of  interests  in certain  Managing  General  Partner
entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc.  ("Insignia") and entities that were,
at one  time,  affiliates  of  Insignia;  past  tender  offers  by the  Insignia
affiliates to acquire limited partnership units;  management of the partnerships
by the  Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of  transactions  which  closed on
October 1, 1998 and February 26, 1999 whereby  Insignia and Insignia  Properties
Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.  The plaintiffs  sought  monetary
damages and equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the Partnership.
On June 25, 1998, the Managing General Partner filed a motion seeking  dismissal
of the action.  In lieu of responding  to the motion,  the  plaintiffs  filed an
amended  complaint.  The Managing General Partner filed demurrers to the amended
complaint which were heard February 1999.

Pending the ruling on such  demurrers,  settlement  negotiations  commenced.  On
November 2, 1999,  the parties  executed and filed a Stipulation  of Settlement,
settling claims, subject to court approval, on behalf of the Partnership and all
limited partners who owned units as of November 3, 1999. Preliminary approval of
the  settlement  was obtained on November 3, 1999 from the Court,  at which time
the Court set a final  approval  hearing for  December  10,  1999.  Prior to the
December  10,  1999  hearing,  the  Court  received  various  objections  to the
settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary approval based upon
the alleged lack of authority of prior lead counsel to enter the settlement.  On
December 14, 1999, the Managing  General  Partner and its affiliates  terminated
the  proposed  settlement.  In  February  2000,  counsel  for some of the  named
plaintiffs filed a motion to disqualify plaintiff's lead and liaison counsel who
negotiated  the  settlement.  On June  27,  2000,  the  Court  entered  an order
disqualifying  them  from the case and an  appeal  was  taken  from the order on
October 5, 2000. On December 4, 2000, the Court  appointed the law firm of Lieff
Cabraser  Heimann & Bernstein  LLP as new lead  counsel for  plaintiffs  and the
putative class.  Plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint on January 19, 2001.
On March 2, 2001,  the  Managing  General  Partner  and its  affiliates  filed a
demurrer to the third amended  complaint.  On May 14, 2001,  the Court heard the
demurrer to the third amended  complaint.  On July 10, 2001, the Court issued an
order  sustaining  defendants'  demurrer on certain  grounds.  On July 20, 2001,
Plaintiffs filed a motion for reconsideration of the Court's July 10, 2001 order
granting in part and denying in part defendants' demurrer. On September 7, 2001,
Plaintiffs  filed a fourth amended class and  derivative  action  complaint.  On
September 12, 2001, the Court denied Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration.  On
October 5, 2001, the Managing General Partner and affiliated  defendants filed a
demurrer to the fourth amended complaint,  which was heard on December 11, 2001.
On February 2, 2002,  the Court served its order  granting in part the demurrer.
The Court dismissed without leave to amend certain of the plaintiffs' claims. On
February 11, 2002, plaintiffs filed a motion seeking to certify a putative class
comprised  of all  non-affiliated  persons  who own or have  owned  units in the
partnerships. The Managing General Partner and affiliated defendants opposed the
motion.  On April 29, 2002, the Court held a hearing on  plaintiffs'  motion for
class certification and took the matter under submission after further briefing,
as ordered by the court,  was  submitted by the parties.  On July 10, 2002,  the
Court  entered an order  vacating the trial date of January 13, 2003 (as well as
the pre-trial and discovery  cut-off  dates) and stayed the case in its entirety
through  November  7, 2002 so that the  parties  could  have an  opportunity  to
discuss  settlement.  On October 30, 2002, the court entered an order  extending
the stay in effect through January 10, 2003.

During the third  quarter of 2001, a complaint  (the "Heller  action") was filed
against  the same  defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action,  captioned
Heller v. Insignia Financial Group. On or about August 6, 2001, plaintiffs filed
a first  amended  complaint.  The  Heller  action  was  brought  as a  purported
derivative  action,  and  asserted  claims  for,  among other  things  breach of
fiduciary duty, unfair competition,  conversion, unjust enrichment, and judicial
dissolution.  Plaintiffs in the Nuanes action filed a motion to consolidate  the
Heller action with the Nuanes action and stated that the Heller action was filed
in order to preserve the derivative  claims that were dismissed without leave to
amend in the Nuanes action by the Court order dated July 10, 2001. On October 5,
2001, the Managing General Partner and affiliated defendants moved to strike the
first amended  complaint in its entirety for violating the Court's July 10, 2001
order  granting in part and denying in part  defendants'  demurrer in the Nuanes
action, or  alternatively,  to strike certain portions of the complaint based on
the  statute of  limitations.  Other  defendants  in the action  demurred to the
fourth amended complaint, and, alternatively,  moved to strike the complaint. On
December 11, 2001,  the court heard argument on the motions and took the matters
under  submission.  On February 4, 2002,  the Court  served  notice of its order
granting defendants' motion to strike the Heller complaint as a violation of its
July 10, 2001 order in the Nuanes  action.  On March 27,  2002,  the  plaintiffs
filed a notice  appealing the order  striking the complaint.  Before  completing
briefing on the appeal, the parties stayed further  proceedings in the appeal in
light of a settlement.

On January 8, 2003,  the parties filed a  Stipulation  of Settlement in proposed
settlement of the Nuanes action and the Heller action.

On June 13, 2003, the Court granted final approval of the settlement and entered
judgment  in both the  Nuanes and  Heller  actions.  While the Nuanes and Heller
actions have been dismissed the settlement only benefits  limited partners as of
December 20, 2002 in those limited  partnerships named in the complaint that are
not in the process of being liquidated or that have already been liquidated. The
Partnership's  limited  partners  will not be entitled to any proceeds  from the
settlement since the Partnership is in the process of being liquidated, but have
not  compromised  any  potential  claims  as a  result  of  the  settlement  and
dismissal.  The Partnership's  limited partners should have received a Notice to
Non-Settling  Persons during April 2003 which describes this information in more
detail.

The  Managing  General  Partner  does  not  anticipate  that  any  costs  to the
Partnership, whether legal or settlement costs, associated with these cases will
be material to the Partnership's overall operations.

The  Partnership is unaware of any other pending or outstanding  litigation that
is not of a routine nature arising in the ordinary course of business.

ITEM 2.     MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

The matters discussed in this report contain certain forward-looking statements,
including, without limitation, statements regarding future financial performance
and the effect of government  regulations.  Actual results may differ materially
from those described in the forward-looking statements and will be affected by a
variety of risks and factors including,  without limitation:  national and local
economic  conditions;  the terms of  governmental  regulations  that  affect the
Registrant and interpretations of those regulations; the competitive environment
in which the Registrant operates;  financing risks, including the risk that cash
flows from operations may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal
and interest;  real estate risks, including variations of real estate values and
the general  economic  climate in local markets and  competition  for tenants in
such markets;  litigation,  including  costs  associated  with  prosecuting  and
defending  claims  and  any  adverse   outcomes,   and  possible   environmental
liabilities.   Readers  should  carefully  review  the  Registrant's   financial
statements and the notes thereto,  as well as the risk factors  described in the
documents  the  Registrant  files  from  time to time  with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission.

Results from Operations

On March 31, 2003,  the  Partnership  sold  Waterford  Square  Apartments  to an
unrelated third party for a gross sales price of  $18,200,000.  The net proceeds
realized by the  Partnership  were  approximately  $6,395,000  after  payment of
closing costs and the first lien  mortgage debt on the property.  During the six
months ended June 30, 2003,  these  proceeds were used to repay certain  Angeles
Mortgage  Investment  Trust  ("AMIT"),  an  affiliate  of the  Managing  General
Partner, debt and a portion of the unsecured working capital loans.

At  December  31,  2002,  the  Partnership  adopted  the  liquidation  basis  of
accounting due to the imminent loss of its two remaining investment  properties.
The Partnership  was also in default on two unsecured  working capital loans and
related accrued  interest,  in a default  position with respect to one note with
recourse  to the  Partnership  and  also  had a lack of  liquidity  to meet  the
recourse  note that  matured on March 1, 2003.  Consequently,  assets  have been
valued at estimated net realizable  value and liabilities are presented at their
estimated settlement amounts, including estimated costs associated with carrying
out the liquidation of the Partnership.  The valuation of assets and liabilities
necessarily  requires many estimates and  assumptions  and there are substantial
uncertainties in carrying out the liquidation.  The actual realization of assets
and  settlement of liabilities  could be higher or lower than amounts  indicated
and is based upon the Managing General Partner's estimates as of the date of the
consolidated financial statements.

The  Partnership   has  unsecured   working  capital  loans  in  the  amount  of
approximately   $4,576,000  plus  related  accrued   interest  of  approximately
$2,745,000  at June  30,  2003.  These  loans  are in  default  as a  result  of
non-payment  of interest and  principal  upon their  maturity in November  1997.
These loans were originally  payable to Angeles  Acceptance Pool, L.P.  ("AAP").
During the year ended December 31, 2000, AAP transferred  ownership of the loans
to Saticoy Investments  Company,  LLC ("Saticoy"),  a wholly owned entity of The
PNL  Companies.  During the year ended  December 31, 2002,  Saticoy  transferred
ownership of the loans to AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate of Angeles Realty
Corporation II ("ARC II" or the "Managing General  Partner").  This indebtedness
is recourse to the Partnership.

During the year ended December 31, 2001, the Managing  General  Partner signed a
forebearance  agreement  with Saticoy.  The Managing  General  Partner agreed to
market Waterford Square Apartments for sale. The forebearance  period began June
1, 2001 and was to end the earlier of March 1, 2002 or the date Waterford Square
Apartments  was sold.  The  Managing  General  Partner  and  Saticoy  negotiated
extensions of the  forebearance  agreement  until July 1, 2002, at which time it
expired.  The Partnership  sold Waterford  Square  Apartments on March 31, 2003.
After  deducting for closing  costs, a portion of the sale proceeds were used to
repay the first lien mortgage debt on the property.

In addition the Partnership had two additional  notes which were recourse to the
Partnership and were owed to AMIT. One of the two notes with a principal balance
of  approximately  $2,405,000  originally  matured in March 1998.  The  Managing
General  Partner  negotiated  with  the  holder  of  the  note  to  extend  this
indebtedness  through  March 2002.  As a result of the sale of Waterford  Square
Apartments,  this  indebtedness,  including  accrued  interest of  approximately
$592,000, was fully repaid during the six months ended June 30, 2003.

The remaining  AMIT note with a principal  balance of  approximately  $4,765,000
matured on March 1, 2003 and was in default due to non-payment. Accrued interest
on this note was approximately $5,792,000 at March 25, 2003. An affiliate of the
Managing General Partner obtained a judgment against the Partnership in December
2002.  An  affiliate  of  the  Managing   General  Partner  had  also  initiated
foreclosure  proceedings  against Fox Crest Apartments,  the Partnership's other
investment property, and on March 25, 2003, the judgment against the Partnership
became final, and AIMCO became the owner of all beneficial interest in Fox Crest
Apartments. As a result, approximately $4,970,000 of accrued interest related to
the remaining AMIT note and approximately $1,592,000 of accrued interest related
to the unsecured  working capital loans was  extinguished  during the six months
ended June 30,  2003.  As a result of the sale of Waterford  Square  Apartments,
approximately  $2,800,000  of principal  and  approximately  $873,000 of accrued
interest  related to the  remaining  AMIT debt,  and  approximately  $100,000 of
accrued  interest  related to the  unsecured  working  capital  loans was repaid
during the six months  ended June 30,  2003.As of June 30,  2003,  approximately
$1,965,000 of principal and approximately $21,000 of accrued interest related to
the  remaining  AMIT note were  outstanding.  Subsequent  to June 30,  2003,  an
additional $350,000 of principal and accrued interest on the remaining AMIT debt
was repaid with proceeds from the sale of Waterford Square Apartments.

During the six months  ended  June 30,  2003,  net  liabilities  in  liquidation
increased by approximately $637,000. This increase is primarily due to decreases
in  investment  properties  and cash and cash  equivalents  partially  offset by
decreases  in  notes  payable,  accrued  interest,  due to  affiliates,  and the
estimated costs during the period of liquidation.  The decrease in the estimated
costs during the period of liquidation is primarily due to the reduced number of
months until the Partnership's  expected  liquidation.  The decrease in cash and
cash  equivalents  is a result of the  payments  made on  Partnership  debt,  as
discussed above. The decreases in investment properties,  notes payable, accrued
interest,  and due to  affiliates  are a result of the sale of Waterford  Square
Apartments and the foreclosure on Fox Crest Apartments as discussed above.

The statement of net  liabilities  in  liquidation  as of June 30, 2003 includes
approximately $38,000 of costs, that the Managing General Partner estimates will
be incurred during the period of  liquidation,  based on the assumption that the
liquidation process will be completed by September 30, 2003. Because the success
in  realization  of assets and the  settlement  of  liabilities  is based on the
Managing General Partner's best estimates, the liquidation period may be shorter
or extended beyond the projected period.

Other

In addition to its  indirect  ownership of the general  partner  interest in the
Partnership,  AIMCO and its affiliates  owned 10,825 limited  partnership  units
(the "Units") in the Partnership representing 24.94% of the outstanding Units at
June 30, 2003. These Units were acquired pursuant to tender offers made by AIMCO
or its affiliates. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement,  unitholders holding a
majority of the units are  entitled to take action with  respect to a variety of
matters that include,  but are not limited to,  voting on certain  amendments to
the  Partnership  Agreement and voting to remove the Managing  General  Partner.
Although  the Managing  General  Partner  owes  fiduciary  duties to the limited
partners of the  Partnership,  the Managing  General Partner also owes fiduciary
duties to AIMCO as its sole stockholder. As a result, the duties of the Managing
General Partner, as managing general partner, to the Partnership and its limited
partners may come into conflict with the duties of the Managing  General Partner
to AIMCO, as its sole stockholder.

Item 3.     Controls and Procedures

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures.  The Partnership's management,  with the
participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer
of the Managing  General  Partner,  who are the equivalent of the  Partnership's
principal executive officer and principal financial officer,  respectively,  has
evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  Partnership's  disclosure  controls  and
procedures (as such term is defined in Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)  under the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")) as of the end
of the period covered by this report.  Based on such  evaluation,  the principal
executive  officer  and  principal  financial  officer of the  Managing  General
Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership's principal executive officer
and principal  financial officer,  respectively,  have concluded that, as of the
end of such period,  the  Partnership's  disclosure  controls and procedures are
effective.

(b) Internal Control Over Financial  Reporting.  There have not been any changes
in the Partnership's  internal control over financial reporting (as such term is
defined in Rules  13a-15(f)  and  15d-15(f)  under the Exchange  Act) during the
fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have  materially  affected,  or
are reasonably likely to materially affect,  the Partnership's  internal control
over financial reporting.

                           PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the  Partnership,  its Managing  General Partner and
several of their  affiliated  partnerships  and corporate  entities.  The action
purported  to  assert  claims  on  behalf  of a class of  limited  partners  and
derivatively  on behalf  of a number  of  limited  partnerships  (including  the
Partnership)  that are named as nominal  defendants,  challenging,  among  other
things,  the  acquisition  of  interests  in certain  Managing  General  Partner
entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc.  ("Insignia") and entities that were,
at one  time,  affiliates  of  Insignia;  past  tender  offers  by the  Insignia
affiliates to acquire limited partnership units;  management of the partnerships
by the  Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of  transactions  which  closed on
October 1, 1998 and February 26, 1999 whereby  Insignia and Insignia  Properties
Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.  The plaintiffs  sought  monetary
damages and equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the Partnership.
On June 25, 1998, the Managing General Partner filed a motion seeking  dismissal
of the action.  In lieu of responding  to the motion,  the  plaintiffs  filed an
amended  complaint.  The Managing General Partner filed demurrers to the amended
complaint which were heard February 1999.

Pending the ruling on such  demurrers,  settlement  negotiations  commenced.  On
November 2, 1999,  the parties  executed and filed a Stipulation  of Settlement,
settling claims, subject to court approval, on behalf of the Partnership and all
limited partners who owned units as of November 3, 1999. Preliminary approval of
the  settlement  was obtained on November 3, 1999 from the Court,  at which time
the Court set a final  approval  hearing for  December  10,  1999.  Prior to the
December  10,  1999  hearing,  the  Court  received  various  objections  to the
settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary approval based upon
the alleged lack of authority of prior lead counsel to enter the settlement.  On
December 14, 1999, the Managing  General  Partner and its affiliates  terminated
the  proposed  settlement.  In  February  2000,  counsel  for some of the  named
plaintiffs filed a motion to disqualify plaintiff's lead and liaison counsel who
negotiated  the  settlement.  On June  27,  2000,  the  Court  entered  an order
disqualifying  them  from the case and an  appeal  was  taken  from the order on
October 5, 2000. On December 4, 2000, the Court  appointed the law firm of Lieff
Cabraser  Heimann & Bernstein  LLP as new lead  counsel for  plaintiffs  and the
putative class.  Plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint on January 19, 2001.
On March 2, 2001,  the  Managing  General  Partner  and its  affiliates  filed a
demurrer to the third amended  complaint.  On May 14, 2001,  the Court heard the
demurrer to the third amended  complaint.  On July 10, 2001, the Court issued an
order  sustaining  defendants'  demurrer on certain  grounds.  On July 20, 2001,
Plaintiffs filed a motion for reconsideration of the Court's July 10, 2001 order
granting in part and denying in part defendants' demurrer. On September 7, 2001,
Plaintiffs  filed a fourth amended class and  derivative  action  complaint.  On
September 12, 2001, the Court denied Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration.  On
October 5, 2001, the Managing General Partner and affiliated  defendants filed a
demurrer to the fourth amended complaint,  which was heard on December 11, 2001.
On February 2, 2002,  the Court served its order  granting in part the demurrer.
The Court dismissed without leave to amend certain of the plaintiffs' claims. On
February 11, 2002, plaintiffs filed a motion seeking to certify a putative class
comprised  of all  non-affiliated  persons  who own or have  owned  units in the
partnerships. The Managing General Partner and affiliated defendants opposed the
motion.  On April 29, 2002, the Court held a hearing on  plaintiffs'  motion for
class certification and took the matter under submission after further briefing,
as ordered by the court,  was  submitted by the parties.  On July 10, 2002,  the
Court  entered an order  vacating the trial date of January 13, 2003 (as well as
the pre-trial and discovery  cut-off  dates) and stayed the case in its entirety
through  November  7, 2002 so that the  parties  could  have an  opportunity  to
discuss  settlement.  On October 30, 2002, the court entered an order  extending
the stay in effect through January 10, 2003.

During the third  quarter of 2001, a complaint  (the "Heller  action") was filed
against  the same  defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action,  captioned
Heller v. Insignia Financial Group. On or about August 6, 2001, plaintiffs filed
a first  amended  complaint.  The  Heller  action  was  brought  as a  purported
derivative  action,  and  asserted  claims  for,  among other  things  breach of
fiduciary duty, unfair competition,  conversion, unjust enrichment, and judicial
dissolution.  Plaintiffs in the Nuanes action filed a motion to consolidate  the
Heller action with the Nuanes action and stated that the Heller action was filed
in order to preserve the derivative  claims that were dismissed without leave to
amend in the Nuanes action by the Court order dated July 10, 2001. On October 5,
2001, the Managing General Partner and affiliated defendants moved to strike the
first amended  complaint in its entirety for violating the Court's July 10, 2001
order  granting in part and denying in part  defendants'  demurrer in the Nuanes
action, or  alternatively,  to strike certain portions of the complaint based on
the  statute of  limitations.  Other  defendants  in the action  demurred to the
fourth amended complaint, and, alternatively,  moved to strike the complaint. On
December 11, 2001,  the court heard argument on the motions and took the matters
under  submission.  On February 4, 2002,  the Court  served  notice of its order
granting defendants' motion to strike the Heller complaint as a violation of its
July 10, 2001 order in the Nuanes  action.  On March 27,  2002,  the  plaintiffs
filed a notice  appealing the order  striking the complaint.  Before  completing
briefing on the appeal, the parties stayed further  proceedings in the appeal in
light of a settlement.

On January 8, 2003,  the parties filed a  Stipulation  of Settlement in proposed
settlement of the Nuanes action and the Heller action.

On June 13, 2003, the Court granted final approval of the settlement and entered
judgment  in both the  Nuanes and  Heller  actions.  While the Nuanes and Heller
actions have been dismissed the settlement only benefits  limited partners as of
December 20, 2002 in those limited  partnerships named in the complaint that are
not in the process of being liquidated or that have already been liquidated. The
Partnership's  limited  partners  will not be entitled to any proceeds  from the
settlement since the Partnership is in the process of being liquidated, but have
not  compromised  any  potential  claims  as a  result  of  the  settlement  and
dismissal.  The Partnership's  limited partners should have received a Notice to
Non-Settling  Persons during April 2003 which describes this information in more
detail.

The  Managing  General  Partner  does  not  anticipate  that  any  costs  to the
Partnership, whether legal or settlement costs, associated with these cases will
be material to the Partnership's overall operations.


<PAGE>



ITEM 6.     EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

      (a)   Exhibits:

            3.1   Amended Certificate and Agreement of Limited Partnership filed
                  in Form S-11 dated  December 24, 1984  incorporated  herein by
                  reference.

            31.1  Certification   of  equivalent  of  Chief  Executive   Officer
                  pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a),
                  as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act
                  of 2002.

            31.2  Certification   of  equivalent  of  Chief  Financial   Officer
                  pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a),
                  as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act
                  of 2002.

            32.1  Certification  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as Adopted
                  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

      (b) Reports on Form 8-K filed during the quarter ended June 30, 2003:

            Current  Report on Form 8-K dated  March 31, 2003 and filed on April
            14, 2003 disclosing the sale of Waterford Square Apartments on March
            31, 2003.

                                   SIGNATURES

In accordance  with the  requirements  of the Exchange Act, the  Registrant  has
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.


                                    ANGELES PARTNERS XIV

                                    By:   Angeles Realty Corporation II
                                          Managing General Partner


                                    By:   /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                          Patrick J. Foye
                                          Executive Vice President

                                    By:   /s/Thomas C. Novosel
                                          Thomas C. Novosel
                                          Senior Vice President and
                                          Chief Accounting Officer

                                    Date: August 13, 2003

Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Patrick J. Foye, certify that:


1.    I have reviewed this quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Angeles  Partners
      XIV;

2.    Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the period  covered by this
      report;

3.    Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other  financial
      information  included  in this  report,  fairly  present  in all  material
      respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
      the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s) and I are responsible for
      establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and have:

      (a)   Designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
            disclosure   controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed  under  our
            supervision,  to ensure that  material  information  relating to the
            registrant,  including its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known
            to us by others  within  those  entities,  particularly  during  the
            period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
            and  procedures and presented in this report our  conclusions  about
            the effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of
            the  end  of the  period  covered  by  this  report  based  on  such
            evaluation; and

      (c)   Disclosed  in this  report any change in the  registrant's  internal
            control  over   financial   reporting   that  occurred   during  the
            registrant's  most recent fiscal  quarter (the  registrant's  fourth
            fiscal  quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
            affected,   or  is  reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,  the
            registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The registrant's other certifying  officer(s) and I have disclosed,  based
      on  our  most  recent   evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial
      reporting,  to the  registrant's  auditors and the audit  committee of the
      registrant's  board of directors  (or persons  performing  the  equivalent
      functions):

      (a)   All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal control over financial  reporting which are
            reasonably  likely to adversely affect the  registrant's  ability to
            record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


      (b)   Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
            other  employees  who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's
            internal control over financial reporting.


Date: August 13, 2003

                                    /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                    Patrick J. Foye
                                    Executive  Vice  President of Angeles Realty
                                    Corporation  II,  equivalent  of  the  chief
                                    executive officer of the Partnership

Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Paul J. McAuliffe, certify that:


1.    I have reviewed this quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Angeles  Partners
      XIV;

2.    Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the period  covered by this
      report;

3.    Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other  financial
      information  included  in this  report,  fairly  present  in all  material
      respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
      the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s) and I are responsible for
      establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and have:

      (a)   Designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
            disclosure   controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed  under  our
            supervision,  to ensure that  material  information  relating to the
            registrant,  including its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known
            to us by others  within  those  entities,  particularly  during  the
            period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
            and  procedures and presented in this report our  conclusions  about
            the effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of
            the  end  of the  period  covered  by  this  report  based  on  such
            evaluation; and

      (c)   Disclosed  in this  report any change in the  registrant's  internal
            control  over   financial   reporting   that  occurred   during  the
            registrant's  most recent fiscal  quarter (the  registrant's  fourth
            fiscal  quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
            affected,   or  is  reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,  the
            registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The registrant's other certifying  officer(s) and I have disclosed,  based
      on  our  most  recent   evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial
      reporting,  to the  registrant's  auditors and the audit  committee of the
      registrant's  board of directors  (or persons  performing  the  equivalent
      functions):

      (a)   All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal control over financial  reporting which are
            reasonably  likely to adversely affect the  registrant's  ability to
            record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b)   Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
            other  employees  who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's
            internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 13, 2003

                                        /s/Paul J. McAuliffe
                                        Paul J. McAuliffe
                                        Executive   Vice   President  and  Chief
                                        Financial   Officer  of  Angeles  Realty
                                        Corporation II,  equivalent of the chief
                                        financial officer of the Partnership

Exhibit 32.1


                          Certification of CEO and CFO
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                   Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Angeles  Partners XIV
(the "Partnership"),  for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof  (the  "Report"),
Patrick  J.  Foye,  as the  equivalent  of the chief  executive  officer  of the
Partnership,  and Paul J.  McAuliffe,  as the equivalent of the chief  financial
officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Partnership.


                                           /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                    Name:  Patrick J. Foye
                                    Date:  August 13, 2003

                                           /s/Paul J. McAuliffe
                                    Name:  Paul J. McAuliffe
                                    Date:  August 13, 2003


This  certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.