alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

American Express Travel Related Services
Company, Inc.

American Express Issuance Trust II

Reporting Period January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016

The undersigned, a duly
authorized representative of American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. (TRS), as Servicer pursuant to the American Express Issuance Trust II (the Trust) Second Amended and Restated Servicing Agreement, dated as
of July 29, 2016 (as so amended and restated and as otherwise amended from time to time, the Agreement), among American Express Receivables Financing Corporation VIII LLC, as transferor, TRS, as servicer (in such capacity, the
Servicer), and The Bank of New York Mellon, as indenture trustee (the Trustee), does hereby certify that:

1. TRS is
Servicer under the Agreement.

2. The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliver this
Certificate.

3. A review of the Servicers activities during the reporting period and of its performance under the Agreement has been
made under my supervision.

4. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the
Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly
executed this Certificate this 9thday of March, 2017.



|                                                       |  |               
|------------------------------------------------------ |  | --------------
|AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES COMPANY, INC.
|                                                       | 
|By:                                                    |  | /s/ J J Anand 
|Name:                                                  |  | J J Anand     
|Title:                                                 |  | Vice President
§ 1016.19 Review, classification and marking of classified information. ( a ) *Classification.* Restricted Data generated or possessed by an Access Permit holder must be appropriately classified and marked in accordance with 10 CFR part 1045. CG-DAR-2, “Guide to the Declassified Areas of Nuclear Energy Research U 08/98,” will be furnished each permittee. In the event a permittee originates classified information which falls within the definition of Restricted Data or information for which the permittee is not positive that the information is outside of that definition and CG-DAR-2 does not provide positive classification guidance for such information, the permittee shall designate the information as Confidential, Restricted Data and request classification guidance from the DOE through the Classification Officer at the cognizant DOE or NNSA office. If the DOE Classification Officer does not have authority to provide the guidance, he will refer the request to the Director, Office of Classification, EHSS-60/Germantown Building, Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585-1290.
( b ) *Challenges.* If a person receives a document or other classified matter which, in his opinion, is not properly classified, or omits the appropriate classification markings, he is encouraged to challenge the classification and there shall be no retribution for submitting a challenge. Challenges shall be submitted in accordance with 10 CFR part 1045.
( c ) *Classification markings.* Restricted Data generated or possessed by an individual approved for access must be appropriately identified and marked in accordance with 10 CFR part 1045, Nuclear Classification and Declassification. Questions and requests for additional direction or guidance regarding the marking of classified matter may be submitted to the Director, Office of Classification, EHSS-60/Germantown Building, Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585-1290.
[82 FR 41507, Sept. 1, 2017, as amended at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023]
§ 1303.109 Restrictions on charging fees. ( a ) When determining search or review fees: ( 1 ) No search or review fee shall be charged for requests by educational institutions, noncommercial scientific institutions, and representatives of the news media.
( 2 ) The Board shall provide without charge, to all but commercial users. ( i ) The first 100 pages of black and white duplication (or the cost equivalent); and
( ii ) The first two hours of search by a clerical staff member (or the cost equivalent).
( 3 ) When the total fee for a request will be $14.00 or less for any request, no fee shall be charged.
( b ) The Provisions of paragraphs (a)(2) and (a)(3) of this section work together. All requestors seeking records for a non-commercial use shall not be charged unless the total cost for the request exceeds by more than $14.00, the cost of a two hour clerical search, plus the cost of duplication over the 100 page exemption.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-40754 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SERGIO CELADA-AVILA,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-99-CR-1096-3

-------------------- July 11, 2001

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Sergio Celada-Silva (“Celada”) was convicted of conspiracy to

launder monetary instruments, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h),

and aiding and abetting the laundering of monetary instruments, in

violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 1956(a)(1)(A)(i). He argues that

insufficient evidence existed to support his convictions. Celada

also argues that the district court erred by failing to admit

hearsay under Fed. R. Evid. 804(b)(1).

We conclude that suffic ient evidence existed to support

Celada’s convictions. S ee United States v. Garcia Abrego
, 141 F.3dNo. 00-40754 -2-

142, 160-62 (5th Cir. 1998); United States v. Gallo
, 927 F.2d 815,

822 (5th Cir. 1991). We also c onclude that the district court did

n ot abuse its discretion by not admitting hearsay evidence under

Fed. R. Evid. 804(b)(1). S ee United States v. Atki ns , 618 F.2d

366, 373 (5th Cir. 1980). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
planet protectors club

United States 

Environmental Protection 

Agency

EPA530-K-98-001

September 1998 1EPA

www.epa.gov/osw

Solid Waste

and Emergency Response

(5305W)
?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?
energy, and resour

Another way to give back to the Earth is by 

like carrots, apples, or leaves go into a pile, where they rot and

become like soil. Then we put the mix back into the Earth to help

plants grow.Remember to be careful when storing or moving

some things, like paint, bug spray, and cleaners. They can hurt

people, plants, and animals if they enter the water or ground. If

each of these tips, we can all help 

our planet.

HELPFUL HINTS... Here’s some important words to help 

you on your journey:

Resource:

Trees, water, and land are examples of

natural resources from the Earth that

people need to live.

Conser

Conser

ve:

ving means to save, such as

conserving water instead of wasting it.

Recycle:

Old cans, jars, and bottles are some of the

things that can be recycled, or made, into

new products.



The old cans, bottles, and paper you collected for recycling

can be made into new things. Making new things from

recycled ones takes less money, less energy, and less of the

Earth’s resources. Use the code below to uncover how the

driveway, bike, slide, and monkey bar change from old to new!

Write the missing letters inside the shapes.

CODE:

=C

ê=S

3⁄4=A

Ã=O

©=P

¿=R

OLD SÃD3⁄4 C3⁄4NS

OLD SÃU©

C3⁄4Nê

OLD 

©LAêTI

BÃTTLEê

OLD TI¿Eê
Safe Place

save by 

can all save by recycling our can

Making new things from recycled ones takes less money, e

and resources, so look for recyled items at the store. Another

way to give back to the Earth is by composting. Scraps like

carrots, apples, or leaves go into a pile, where they rot and

become like soil. Then we put the mix back into the Earth to help

plants grow. Remember to be careful when storing or moving

some things, like paint , bug , and cleanes. They can hurt

people , plants, and animals if they enter the

or ground. If we follow each of these tips, we can all 

help our planet.
Safe Place

missing letters inside the shapes.

CODE:



ê=S

3⁄4=A

Ã=O

©=P

¿=R

Old Soup

Cans

Old Plastic

Bottles

Old Tires

add your own

— fruits

— vegetables

— leaves

— grass clippings

to this drawing

What’s a

Resource?

Search for Saving

Resources

Answers

Recycling Saves

Resources From Old to New

Handle with Care What’s Compost?

Old Soda Cans

=C
2 Printed on paper that contains at least 20 percent postconsumer fiber.
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Gold Ridge Resources, Inc. a Nevada corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), David Mough, Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ David MoughDavid MoughPrincipal Executive OfficerDate: September 6, 2013





This certification accompanies this report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.





A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-1672

TERESA MILLER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JUDGE PHILLIP DOUGLAS GAUJOT, Monongalia County Circuit Court Judge; 

STEVEN FITZ; EDWARD ROLLO; MICHAEL PENNINGTON; DEANDRA 

BURTON; ASHLEY HUNT; MICHAEL PAMER; ROBERT W. TRUMBLE, 

United States District Court; WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF 

APPEALS; CIRCUIT COURT OF MONONGALIA COUNTY; 

JUDGE SUMMERS; WILLIAM PENNINGTON; UNITED STATES DISTRICT 

COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA; UNITED 

STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 18-6690

TERESA MILLER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

PHILLIP D. GAUJOT; EDMUND ROLLO; STEPHEN FITIZ; 

MS. DECHRISTOPHER; LESA REIDMAN/BARRET; LANCE KURTZA; 

WEST VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD,

Defendants - Appellees.
2

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, 

at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:17-cv-03951; 2:17-cv04130)

Submitted: October 19, 2018 Decided: November 7, 2018

Before RICHARDSON and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Teresa Miller, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Teresa Miller seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order overruling her objections to the magistrate judge’s rulings on her motions to 

transfer, for a change of venue, to amend her complaint, to admit additional evidence, and 

for a jury trial in her civil actions brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).1

 

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and 

certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order 

Miller seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral 

order.2

 Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

 1 Although this court has been named as a defendant-appellee in appeal No. 18-

1672, we exercise our discretion to decide the appeal pursuant to the Rule of Necessity. 

United States v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 211-17 (1980).

2 Insofar as Miller seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s pretrial orders ruling on 

these nondispositive issues, we also lack jurisdiction to consider her appeals of those 

interlocutory orders.
§ 959.85 Proceeding after termination. ( a ) Upon the termination of the provisions of this subpart the then functioning members of the committee shall continue as joint trustees for the purpose of settling the affairs of the committee by liquidating all of the funds and property then in the possession of or under control of the committee, including claims for any funds unpaid or property not delivered at the time of such termination. Action by said trusteeship shall require the concurrence of a majority of the said trustees.
( b ) The said trustees shall continue in such capacity until discharged by the Secretary; shall, from time to time, account for all receipts and disbursements and deliver all property on hand, together with all books and records of the committee and of the trustees, to such person as the Secretary may direct; and shall, upon request of the Secretary, execute such assignments or other instruments necessary or appropriate to vest in such persons full title and right to all of the funds, property, and claims vested in the committee or the trustees pursuant to this subpart.
( c ) Any person to whom funds, property, or claims have been transferred or delivered by the committee or its members, pursuant to this section, shall be subject to the same obligations imposed upon the members of the committee and upon the said trustees.
§ 1013.8 Service of complaint. ( a ) Service of a complaint must be made by certified or registered mail or by delivery in any manner authorized by Rule 4(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Service is complete upon receipt.
( b ) Proof of service, stating the name and address of the person on whom the complaint was served, and the manner and date of service, may be made by— ( 1 ) Affidavit of the individual serving the complaint by delivery;
( 2 ) A United States Postal Service return receipt card acknowledging receipt; or
( 3 ) Written acknowledgment of receipt by the defendant or his or her representative.
#### § 996.15 Positive lot identification.

*Positive lot identification* is a means of identifying those peanuts meeting outgoing quality regulations as defined in § 996.31 and relating the inspection certificate issued by the Inspection Service, as defined in § 996.10, to the lot covered so that there is no doubt that the peanuts in the lot are the same peanuts described on the inspection certificate.

[81 FR 50288, Aug. 1, 2016]
#### § 987.59 Safeguards.

The Committee may prescribe, with the approval of the Secretary, such rules, regulations and safeguards as are necessary to prevent dates covered by §§ 987.55 and 987.56 from interfering with the objectives of this part.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Donnell Davis, Appellant.

Submitted July 23, 2007;

decided September 18, 2007

Reported below, 9 AD3d 468.

Motion for an extension of the time within which to apply for permission to appeal pursuant to CPL 460.20 dismissed as untimely.
#### § 986.23 Hican.

*Hican* means a tree resulting from a cross between a pecan and some other type of hickory (members of the genus *Carya*) or the nut from such a hybrid tree.
Subpart 1841.5 [Reserved]

Parent topic: PART 1841—ACQUISITION OF UTILITY SERVICES
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,040,092
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  429,038
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,687
<INVENTORY>                                     22,250
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,483,571
<PP&E>                                         157,413
<DEPRECIATION>                                 225,129
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,323,843
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,442
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       927,083
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,323,843
<SALES>                                      1,236,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,236,600
<CGS>                                           44,405
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,330,001
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 625
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (93,401)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (93,401)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (93,401)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)
        

</TABLE>
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3556 

To clarify the rules of origin for certain textile and apparel products. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 22, 2006 

Mr. DEMINT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To clarify the rules of origin for certain textile and apparel 

products. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RULES OF ORIGIN FOR CERTAIN TEXTILE AND 

4 APPAREL PRODUCTS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 334(b)(2)(A)(i) of the 

6 Uruguay Round Agreements Act (19 U.S.C. 

7 3592(b)(2)(A)(i)) is amended by inserting ‘‘(except 

8 6303.12.0010 and 6303.92.2030)’’ after ‘‘6303’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies to goods entered or withdrawn from 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•S 3556 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the date that is 

2 15 days after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
Exhibit 31.2

Section 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Michael
D. Grubbs, certify that:



|(1) | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No.1) of TRI Pointe Homes, Inc.; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                                      
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 30, 2014 |  | /s/ Michael D. Grubbs                                
|                     | 
|                     |  | Michael D. Grubbs                                    
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)



1
Editorial Note on Part 91
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 91 appear at 61 FR 51350, Oct. 2 1996.

§ 91.29 Issuance of duplicate certificates or reissuance of an analysis report. ( a ) Upon request by an applicant, a duplicate certificate or an additional report may be issued for a lost, destroyed, or otherwise not obtainable original form.
( b ) The duplicate certificate or the reissuance of an analysis report shall be at the expense of the applicant.
( c ) Requests for duplicate certificates or additional analysis reports shall be filed as follows: ( 1 ) In writing;
( 2 ) By the applicant who requested the service covered by the lost, destroyed, or otherwise not obtainable original form; and
( 3 ) With the office that issued the initial certificate or original laboratory analysis report.
( d ) The duplicate certificates or reissued analysis reports shall show the following: ( 1 ) The terms “Duplicate Original,” and the copies shall show “Duplicate Copy,”
( 2 ) A statement that the certificate or letter report was issued in lieu of a lost or destroyed or otherwise not obtainable certificate or laboratory analysis report; and
( 3 ) The same statements and information, including permissive statements, that were shown on the original certificate or the initial analysis report shall be shown on the duplicate form.
( e ) Duplicate certificates or duplicate analysis reports shall be issued as promptly as possible and distributed as the original certificates or original analysis reports and their copies.
( f ) Duplicate certificates shall not be issued for certificates that have been superseded.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Integra Bank Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael T. Vea, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Michael T. Vea
------------------
Chairman of the Board, President
And Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2002