alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) CR NO. 2:06cr202-WKW

)

EUGENE CLECKLER and )

KIM CLECKLER )

ORDER

The court having continued this case for trial to the January 2007 term, it is

ORDERED that a final pretrial conference be and is hereby set for November 13,

2006 at 1:00 p.m. in Courtroom 4B, United States Courthouse Complex, One Church Street,

Montgomery, Alabama. 

All applicable deadlines contained in the prior arraignment order and pretrial order

are adjusted accordingly, including the deadline for the filing of pretrial, dispositive motions.

It is further

ORDERED that the defendants’ motions for extensions of time to file pretrial motions

(docs. # 36 & 37) be and are hereby DENIED as moot.

Done this the 21 day of September, 2006. st

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 40 Filed 09/21/2006 Page 1 of 1
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 2:06mj69-DRB

 )

HECTOR R. SILVA, )

ROSA E. RINCON )

GOVERNMENT'S MOTION FOR DETENTION HEARING

Comes now the United States of America, by and through Leura

G. Canary, United States Attorney for the Middle District of

Alabama, and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3142(e) and (f) moves for a

detention hearing for the above-captioned defendant.

1. Eligibility of Cases

This case is eligible for a detention order because this case

involves:

Crime of violence (18 U.S.C. 3156)

 X Maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death

 X 10 + year drug offense

Felony, with two prior convictions in the above categories

 X Serious risk the defendant will flee

 X Serious risk of obstruction of justice

2. Reason For Detention

The Court should detain defendant because there are no

conditions of release which will reasonably assure:

 X Defendant's appearance as required

 X Safety of any other person and the community

Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 5 Filed 07/14/2006 Page 1 of 3
3. Rebuttable Presumption

The United States will invoke the rebuttable presumption

against defendant under Section 3142(e). The presumption applies

because:

X Probable cause to believe defendant committed 10 + year

drug offense or an offense in which a firearm was used or

carried under Section 924(c)

Previous conviction for "eligible" offense committed while

on pretrial bond

 A period of five years has not elapsed from defendant's

conviction or release from imprisonment for the offense

described above

4. Time For Detention Hearing

The United States requests the Court conduct the detention

hearing:

At the initial appearance

 X After continuance of 3 days

The Government requests leave of Court to file a supplemental

motion with additional grounds or presumption for detention should

this be necessary.

Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 5 Filed 07/14/2006 Page 2 of 3
Respectfully submitted this the 14th day of July, 2006.

LEURA G. CANARY 

United States Attorney

/s/Terry F. Moorer

TERRY F. MOORER

Assistant United States Attorney

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334)223-7280

Fax: (334)223-7135

E-mail: terry.moorer@usdoj.gov

Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 5 Filed 07/14/2006 Page 3 of 3
§ 1704.6 Procedures for public announcement of meetings. ( a ) For each meeting, the Board shall make public announcement, at least one week before the meeting, of the: ( 1 ) Time of the meeting;
( 2 ) Place of the meeting;
( 3 ) Subject matter of the meeting;
( 4 ) Whether the meeting is to be open or closed; and
( 5 ) The name and business telephone number of the official designated by the Board to respond to requests for information about the meeting.
( b ) The one week advance notice required by paragraph (a) of this section may be reduced only if: ( 1 ) A majority of all Members determines by recorded vote that Board business requires that such meeting be scheduled in less than seven days; and
( 2 ) The public announcement required by paragraph (a) of this section is made at the earliest practicable time.
( c ) Immediately following each public announcement required by this section, or by § 1704.7, the Board shall submit a notice of public announcement for publication in the Federal Register.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6817

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus BOBBIE SUE BARNETT, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (1:04-cr-00117; 1:07-cv-00016) Submitted: July 24, 2007 Decided: August 1, 2007 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bobbie Sue Barnett, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Bobbie Sue Barnett seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Barnett has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
702.270-1 Definitions clause.

Use the appropriate clause in 752.202–1, in addition to the clause in (48 CFR) FAR 52.202–1.

Parent topic: Subpart 702.270—Definitions Clause
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CR. NO. 3:06cr199-MEF

) 

ANTHONY SANFORD )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the motion for writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum filed

June 25, 2008, and for good cause shown, it is

ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. The Clerk of this Court is hereby

DIRECTED to issue a WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD PROSEQUENDUM addressed to

St. Clair Correctional Facility, Springville, Alabama, commanding them to deliver

ANTHONY SANFORD to any United States Marshal or Deputy United States Marshal, and

directing said Marshal or Deputy to bring said prisoner before this court to be held at

Montgomery, Alabama, on August 13, 2008, at 10:30 a.m. and to return the prisoner to said

official when the court shall have finished with him.

Done this 26th day of June, 2008.

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cr-00199-MEF-CSC Document 8 Filed 06/26/2008 Page 1 of 1
2448.102 Policies.       (a) The authority of the agency head to exempt contracts from including Value Engineering (VE) procedures and processes under 48 CFR 48.102(a) is delegated to the HCA for individual (case-by-case) exemptions and to the Senior Procurement Executive for class exemptions.          (b) The Senior Procurement Executive is responsible for managing and monitoring HUD's VE efforts.    **Parent topic:** PART 2448 - VALUE ENGINEERING
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 33 (Friday, February 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7539-7540]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3174]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Assistance 
Center Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer 
Assistance Center Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy 
Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, March 23, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Smiley at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-
231-2360.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Assistance 
Center Committee will be held Tuesday, March 23, 2010, at 1 p.m. 
Central Time

[[Page 7540]]

via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments 
or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited 
conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made 
with Ellen Smiley. For more information please contact Ms. Smiley at 1-
888-912-1227 or 414-231-2360, or write TAP Office Stop 1006MIL, 211 
West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53203-2221, or post comments to 
the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: February 4, 2010.
Shawn F. Collins,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2010-3174 Filed 2-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
# • RCRAREVISION CHECKLIST 59


# . Hazardous Waste Miscellaneous Units; Standards Applicable to Owners and Operators 54

# m615-617 January 9, 1989 (non-HSWA ClusterV) Note: This is a correction andclarification of 52 FR 46946 (December 10, 1987) addressedby Revision Checklist 45. States are encouraged to adopt these corrections at the same time that the requirements for Revision Checklist 45 are

.adopted.

AJune 22, 1989 (54 FR 26198) final rule amended the preamble ofthe December 10, 1987 rule addressedby Revision Checklist 45. Because this was the only change made by this final rule, a checklistwas not developed for it, nor was it incorporated into this present checklist. STATE ANALOG IS: FEDERAL REQUIREMENT FEDERAL RCRA CITATION ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION EQUIVALENT MORE' BRQADSTRIN- ER IN GENT SCQPE' 

# •

• PART 270
- EPAADMINISTERED PERMIT PROGRAMS: THE HAZARDOUS WASTE PERMIT PROGRAM SUBPART B - PERMITAPPLICATION CONTENTS OF PART B: GENERALREQUIREMENTS WAC 173-303 change "264.194" to "264.193(i)"; add "264.195" 270.14(b)(5) -806(4)(a)(v) X add reference to 264.197 270.14(b)(13) -806(4)(a)(xiii) X

January 9, 1989
- Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2

   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
               SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      In connection with the quarterly report of Simclar, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven T. Ker,
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, hereby certify as of the
date hereof, solely for purpose of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the
United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

      This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.


                                     /s/ Steven T. Ker
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Steven T. Ker, Chief Financial Officer and
                                     Secretary
                                     Simclar, Inc.
                                     August 12, 2005
EX-35.1
(logo) MIDLAND    (logo) PNC
       LOAN              REAL ESTATE
       SERVICES

OFFICER CERTIFICATE

J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
Series 2012-LC9

March 1, 2013

Pursuant to the requirements of that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement
(the "Agreement"), it is hereby certified that on behalf of PNC Bank, National
Association d/b/a Midland Loan Services as successor by merger to Midland Loan
Services, Inc. (the "Servicer"),

(i) a review of the Servicer's activities during the calendar year 2012 (the
"Reporting Period") and of its performance under the Agreement has been made
under the undersigned officer's supervision;
(ii) to the best of the undersigned officer's knowledge, based on such review,
the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all
material respects throughout the Reporting Period or, if there has been a
failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, each such
failure known to the undersigned officer and the nature and status thereof are
set forth below; and

Nature and Status of Failures: None.

PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCATION
d/ba MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES


/s/ Steven W. Smith
Steven W. Smith
Executive Vice President

Member of The PNC Financial Services Group

10851 Mastin Boulevard  Overland Park, Kansas 66210
800-327-8083
www.pnc.com/midland
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

V. ) CR. No.: 2:06cr209-WKW

)

BRIDGET Y. TAYLOR )

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING

COMES NOW the Defendant, Bridget Taylor, by and through undersigned counsel,

Kevin L. Butler, and moves for good cause and pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(a) for an order

continuing sentencing for thirty (30) days. In support of this motion, the Defendant would show

the following: 

1. This matter is presently set for sentencing on January 22, 2006, before the

Honorable Keith Watkins. 

2. On October 10, 2006, pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement, Ms. Taylor entered

a plea of guilty to the Indictment filed in this case. 

3. At the time the plea was entered, undersigned counsel was aware that Ms. Taylor

had a prior criminal record.

4. On or about December 19, 2006, undersigned counsel received the preliminary

guideline report in this case. Pursuant to the guideline report, Ms. Taylor has a total criminal

history score of 28 points. This criminal history score is far greater than expected by counsel. 

5. Undersigned counsel is presently conducting a background investigation of Ms.

Taylor’s past and incidents referenced in the PSI. However, it is not anticipated that this criminal

and personal investigation will be complete on or about January 22, 2007.

Case 2:06-cr-00209-MHT-CSC Document 24 Filed 12/27/2006 Page 1 of 3
WHEREFORE, the Defendant prays that sentencing in this matter be continued from

January 22, 2007, for an additional thirty (30) days.

Dated this 27 day of December 2006. TH

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Kevin L. Butler

KEVIN L. BUTLER

First Assistant Federal Defender

201 Monroe Street, Suite 407

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Phone: (334) 834-2099

Fax: (334) 834-0353

E-mail: kevin_butler@fd.org

AZ Bar Code: 014138

Case 2:06-cr-00209-MHT-CSC Document 24 Filed 12/27/2006 Page 2 of 3
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

V. ) CR. No.: 2:06cr209-WKW

)

BRIDGET Y. TAYLOR )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on December 27, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with the

Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the

following: 

Verne Speirs, Esquire

Assistant United States Attorney

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Kevin L. Butler

KEVIN L. BUTLER

First Assistant Federal Defender

201 Monroe Street, Suite 407

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Phone: (334) 834-2099

Fax: (334) 834-0353

E-mail: kevin_butler@fd.org

AZ Bar Code: 014138

Case 2:06-cr-00209-MHT-CSC Document 24 Filed 12/27/2006 Page 3 of 3
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 13

- 00148

- CV

SHA, LLC D/B/A FIRST CARE

, Appellant

v.

FIDELITY BENEFITS & INSURANCE

SERVICES, LLLP

, Appellee

From the 414th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2009

- 891

- 5

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The parties have filed an “Agreed Motion to Remand,” which states that they

have reached a mediated resolution of all issues in this case and have since

implemented their agreement. The parties ask us to set aside the judgment entered in

this case without regard to the merits and remand the case to the trial court for further

proceedings consistent with the parties’ resolution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). The

parties further state that we may tax costs against the party incurring same.SHA, LLC v. Fidelity Benefits & Ins

. Servs

. , LLLP Page 2

The agreed motion is granted. Accordingly, we set aside the trial court’s

judgment without regard to the merits and remand the case to the trial court for further

proceedings in accordance with the parties’ agreement. Costs of this appeal are taxed

against the part y incurring same.

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion granted; judgment set aside; cause remanded

Opinion delivered and filed August 15, 2013

[CV06]
# 1825.003 Definitions.

**Parent topic:**PART 1825—FOREIGN ACQUISITION
No. 89-877.

#### Watkins *v.*Foltz, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Case 2:06-cr-00198-WKW-CSC Document 19 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3426 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3426

            To extend temporarily the duty on carbamic acid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 6, 2006

  Mr. Durbin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To extend temporarily the duty on carbamic acid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CARBAMIC ACID.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.33.61 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to ((3-
((Dimethylamino)carbonyl)-2-pyridinyl)sulfonyl) carbamic acid, phenyl 
ester) is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/
2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 3:06-cr-208-MEF

)

JASON EDWARD COFIELD )

O R D E R

On September 29, 2006, the defendant filed a motion to suppress (Doc. #22) and a

hearing was held on the motion on October 27, 2006. The court has not had sufficient time

to enter a ruling on this dispositive motion. Accordingly, it is hereby 

ORDERED that the trial of this case set for November 27, 2006 is continued to the

March 12, 2007 criminal trial term.

The Magistrate Judge shall conduct a final pretrial conference prior to the March 12,

2007 trial term.

DONE this 13th of November, 2006.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cr-00208-MEF-CSC Document 30 Filed 11/13/2006 Page 1 of 1
1345.604 Disposal of surplus property.

Surplus property shall be disposed of in accordance with procedures outlined in the DOC Personal

Property Management Manual.

Parent topic: Subpart 1345.6 - Reporting, Reutilization, and Disposal
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

May 30, 2007

 

NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE

To: ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD

From: CLERK’S OFFICE

Case Style: Progressive American Insurance vs. Carol Thorn

Case Number: 2:06cv717-ID

Referenced Pleading: Document #45 Notice of Filing Requests for Production

The referenced pleading was electronically filed on ***May 24, 2007*** in this case and is not

in compliance with the local rules and/or administrative procedures of this court.

*****This pleading is discovery and is not allowed pursuant to Local Rule 5.1 Non-Filing of

Civil Discovery.

The pleading is hereby STRICKEN from the record and the parties are instructed to

disregard the entry of this pleading on the court’s docket. Parties should be aware that the

striking of this entry does not affect their responsibilities as to the discovery process.

Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 46 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 1 of 1
APPENDIX D - RESERVED Table Of Contents

Parent topic: Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation
§ 13.41 Stay pending appeal. ( a ) An initial decision is stayed automatically pending disposition of a motion for reconsideration or of an appeal to the authority head.
( b ) No administrative stay is available following a final decision of the authority head.