alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1048 

Honoring the courageous actions of Minnie Vautrin during the Rape of 

Nanking during World War II. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2006 

Mr. HONDA (for himself, Mr. EVANS, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. 

HYDE, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. JACKSON of Illinois, Ms. ZOE LOFGREN

of California, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania, Mr. CONYERS, 

Mr. GONZALEZ, Mr. WYNN, Mr. SCHIFF, and Ms. MATSUI) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government 

Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the courageous actions of Minnie Vautrin during 

the Rape of Nanking during World War II. 

Whereas the Japanese Army’s invasion and occupation of 

Nanking, China, in 1937 is historically known as the 

‘‘Rape of Nanking’’; 

Whereas during that tragic atrocity, an estimated 300,000 

innocent Chinese civilians were killed by the Japanese 

army and over 20,000 were raped, with some estimates 

as high as 80,000; 

Whereas Minnie Vautrin was born on September 27, 1886 in 

Secor, Illinois; 


CColeman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1048 IH 

Whereas in 1912, Miss Vautrin went to China as a missionary and educator and while there served on the faculty of Ginling College in Nanking for more than 20 

years; 

Whereas when the Japanese army invaded Nanking on December 13, 1937, Miss Vautrin, and the other few nonChinese people in the city who refused to evacuate, 

worked to protect the civilians who were mostly women 

and children; 

Whereas by using the American flag and obtaining proclamations from the American Embassy in China maintaining 

Ginling College as a sanctuary, Miss Vautrin repelled incursions into the campus; 

Whereas Miss Vautrin risked her own life and valiantly protected over 10,000 women and children in Ginling from 

the Japanese army; and 

Whereas survivors of the Rape of Nanking were so grateful 

to Miss Vautrin that they gave her the names ‘‘Living 

Goddess’’ and ‘‘Goddess of Mercy’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That Congress honors— 

2 (1) Minnie Vautrin’s commitment to education 

3 and humanitarianism and to saving thousands of 

4 lives; and 

5 (2) Miss Vautrin’s sacrifice, courage, humanity, 

6 and commitment to peace, mercy, hope, and justice 

7 during the violent Rape of Nanking. 

Æ 


CColeman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
#### § 915.68 Agents.

The Secretary may, by designation in writing, name any officer or employee of the United States, or name any agency or division in the United States Department of Agriculture, to act as his agent or representative in connection with any of the provisions of this part.
1519.705-70 Synopsis of contracts containing

Pub. L. 95-507 subcontracting plans and

goals.

The synopsis of contract award, where applicable, shall include a statement identifying the contract

as one containing Public Law 95-507 subcontracting plans and goals.

Parent topic: Subpart 1519.7 - The Small Business Subcontracting Program
#### § 1048.6 Posting.

Notices stating the pertinent prohibitions of §§ 1048.3 and 1048.4 and the penalties of § 1048.5 will be conspicuously posted at all entrances of each facility or parcel of real property subject to the regulations in this part, and at such intervals along the perimeters thereof as will provide reasonable assurance of notice to persons about to enter.
#### In the Matter of John Orloff, Respondent, v. City of Gloversville et al., Appellants.

Reynolds, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered in Fulton County, in a proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, annulling a determination by appellants reclassifying respondent from lieutenant to patrolman, and directing his reinstatement to the rank of lieutenant. Special Term correctly held that since respondent was performing the duties of a lieutenant and receiving the salary thereof until his reclassification on April 16, 1969, he was not aggrieved until such time, and that accordingly since his petition for reinstatement of June 3, 1969 and his bringing of the instant proceeding on July 8, 1969 were within the four-month period following such reclassification, the Statute of Limitations under article 78, and the doctrine of laches did not preclude his bringing the instant proceeding. We also concur in Special Term’s conclusion that despite the fact that respondent’s promotion to lieutenant was denominated “ probationary ”, it was in fact permanent *(Matter of Rasmussen*v. *Board of Supervisors of County of Erie,*175 Mise. 838, affd. 262 App. Div. 815; *Matter of Spindel*v. *New York City Sousing Auth.,*41 Mise 2d 363; *Kass*v. *Gross,*76 N. Y. S. 2d 309). Section 63 of the Civil Service Law does not mandate a probationary period where as here the promotion is intradepartmental and appellant’s rule XIV does not even provide for one. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., Greenblott and Cooke, JJ., concur in memorandum by Reynolds, J.
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 78 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 1 of 1
2813.70-2 Procedures.

(a) The certified invoice procedure for purchases may be used only under FAR part 13 and this part,

subject to the following:

(1) The individual transaction amount does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold;

(2) Availability of sufficient funds is verified;

(3) A purchase order is not required by either the supplier or the Government;

(4) The vendor submits approved and appropriate invoices; and,

(5) The items purchased are domestic source end products, except as provided in FAR subpart 25.1.

(b) Using the certified invoice procedures does not eliminate the requirements in FAR part 13 that

apply to purchases at or below the micro-purchase threshold.

(c) The chief of the contracting office, as defined in JAR 2802.101, may delegate the authority to use

the certified invoice procedure. Each delegation must specify any limitations placed on the

individual's use of these procedures, such as limits on the amount of each purchase, or limits on the

commodities, or services being procured.

(d) Individuals using this purchasing technique shall require the supplier to immediately submit

properly prepared invoices that itemize property or services furnished. Upon receiving the invoice,

the individual making the purchase shall annotate the invoice with the date of receipt, verify the

accuracy of the invoiced amount and verify on the invoice that the supplies and/or services have

been received and accepted. If the invoice is valid and correct, the individual making the purchase

shall sign the invoice indicating acceptance and immediately forward it to the appropriate

administrative office.

(e) The administrative office must approve the invoice and, if approved, forward it to the Finance

Office for payment. Before forwarding the invoice to the Finance Office, the administrative office

shall place the following statement on the invoice, along with the accounting and appropriation data:

Parent topic: Subpart 2813.70 - Certified Invoice Procedure
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>6
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED 
FROM THE FORM 10-Q AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS 
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>1
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>           8,224,123
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>          5,719,020
<RECEIVABLES>                           0
<ASSETS-OTHER>                     29,315
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>            1,213,799
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  6,962,134
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>         496,366
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>               496,366
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                         0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>        8,970,869
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>             149,863
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>             155,671
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>               0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                  0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                 0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>       (2,505,101)
<NET-ASSETS>                    6,465,768
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                       0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                  76,432
<OTHER-INCOME>                     25,023
<EXPENSES-NET>                    714,563
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>          (613,108)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>           21,824
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>         506,588
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>             (84,696)
<EQUALIZATION>                          0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>               0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                   0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                 0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>         5,808
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                     0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>           (334,980)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                 0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>               0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                 0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>              0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>              99,249
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                   718,763
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>            6,633,258
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                  64
<PER-SHARE-NII>                        (3)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                 0 <F1>
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                    0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>               0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                    0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                    61
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                      10.8
<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING>                  0
<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE>                    0
<FN>
<F1>
A zero value is used since the change in net unrealized fair value is not 
allocated to General Partners and Limited Partners as it is not taxable.  
Only taxable gains or losses are allocated in accordance with the 
Partnership Agreement.
</FN>

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CHRISTINE BENNETT, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACT. NO. 1:06-CV-723-MHT

)

ARMY FLEET SUPPORT )

SERVICES, LLC, )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

Upon consideration of the unopposed motion to extend the deadline for expert

witness reports (doc. # 28), it is

ORDERED that the motion be and is hereby GRANTED. No other deadline

established in the court’s scheduling order is modified.

Done this 21st day of March, 2007.

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 29 Filed 03/21/2007 Page 1 of 1
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR NO. 1:06cr197-MEF

 ) 

RODERICK CHARLES MELVIN )

MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT

Comes now the United States of America, by and through Leura G. Canary, United States

Attorney for the Middle District of Alabama, and moves the Court to Dismiss the Indictment,

heretofore filed, in the above-styled cause to Roderick Charles Melvin, on the following

grounds, to wit: Insufficient evidence. 

Respectfully submitted this the 7th day of February, 2007.

LEURA G. CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/Tommie Brown Hardwick

TOMMIE BROWN HARDWICK

Assistant United States Attorney

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334) 223-7280

FAX: (334) 223-7135

E-mail: tommie.hardwick@usdoj.gov

Case 1:06-cr-00197-MEF-CSC Document 40 Filed 02/07/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR NO. 1:06cr197-MEF

 )

RODERICK CHARLES MELVIN )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on February 7, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing with the

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the

following: Kevin L. Butler, Esq.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/Tommie Brown Hardwick

TOMMIE BROWN HARDWICK

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334) 223-7280

FAX: (334) 223-7135

E-mail: tommie.hardwick@usdoj.gov

Case 1:06-cr-00197-MEF-CSC Document 40 Filed 02/07/2007 Page 2 of 2
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR NO. 1:06cr197-MEF

 )

RODERICK CHARLES MELVIN )

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Motion for Leave to Dismiss the Indictment as to Roderick

Charles Melvin, heretofore filed in the above-styled cause, and for good cause shown, the Court

is of the opinion that the motion should be and the same hereby is granted. It is, therefore,

CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED by the Court that said motion be

and the same is hereby granted.

DONE this _____ day of February, 2007.

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cr-00197-MEF-CSC Document 40-2 Filed 02/07/2007 Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

EARL DOUGLAS WALKER, JR.,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 300 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 29th day of November, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

BRIAN BONNER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 3:06cv715-MHT

) 

NORINCO a/k/a CHINA NORTH )

INDUSTRIES CORP., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion for leave to amend

answer (Doc. No. 62) is set for submission, without oral

argument, on November 28, 2007, with all briefs due by

said date. 

DONE, this the 16th day of November, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 63 Filed 11/16/2007 Page 1 of 1
3023.9000 Contract clause (USCG).

For the U.S. Coast Guard, where all or part of a contract will be performed on Government-owned or

leased property, the contracting officer shall insert the clause at (HSAR) 48 CFR 3052.223–90,

Accident and Fire Reporting.

Parent topic: Subpart 3023.90—Safety Requirements for USCG Contracts
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****U.S. Armyjournal of installation management**** 
SuDocNumber:D101.142/2:
ItemNumber:0307-A-55(online)
CGPsystem Number:000598163
 
 
2006- spring2006.pdf
 
2007- summer2007.pdfwinter2007.pdf
 
2008- summer2008.pdfwinter2008.pdf
 
2009- summer2009.pdf
 
2010- fall2010-special.ed.pdfsummer2010.pdf
 
2011- fall2011.pdfspring2011.pdfsummer2011.pdfwinter2011.pdf
 
 **
Exhibit 10.26

 

SUMMARY OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

 

We pay our non-employee directors, who consist of all our directors other than our chief executive officer, an annual fee of $75,000 for their services as directors. We pay an annual fee of $25,000 to the chair of our audit committee, $20,000 to the chair of our compensation committee, $10,000 to the chairs of our executive committee and our nominating and corporate governance committee, and $5,000 to each non-employee director who serves as a member, but not the chair, of any committee for service on each committee above one. Our chairman also receives an annual fee of $150,000, as well as office space, support services and healthcare benefits, for his services as chairman of our board of directors. Directors who are employees do not receive separate fees for their services as directors. All of the payments described in this paragraph are made in cash.

 

Under the terms of our 2006 equity incentive plan, each director who is not employed by, and does not provide independent contractor services as a consultant or advisor to, us or our subsidiaries receives automatic restricted stock awards. We refer to these directors as our “outside directors.” Currently, our outside directors are Dr. Rowland Moriarty, Prof. Robert Holthausen, Messrs. William Concannon, Thomas Avery and Robert Whitman and Mme. Nancy Hawthorne. Each outside director who is re-elected as one of our directors at, or whose term continues after, our annual meeting of shareholders will, on the date of the meeting, receive a restricted stock award, vesting in four equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant, valued at $75,000, based on the closing price of our common stock as of that date. Each person who is first elected an outside director at our annual meeting of shareholders will receive, on the date of his or her election, a restricted stock award, vesting in four equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant, in an amount to be determined by our board of directors.
Exhibit 35.3 REDWOOD RESIDENTIAL ACQUISITION CORPORATION One Belvedere Place, Suite 300 Mill Valley, CA 94941 February 27, 2019 TO ALL PARTIES LISTED
ON SCHEDULE A ATTACHED HERETO:  Re:
Annual Statement of Compliance by the Servicing Administrator; Item 1123 Certificate; Sequoia Mortgage Trusts (SEMT) 2012-1,
2012-2, 2012-3, 2012-4, 2012-5 and 2012-6; and
SEMT 2013-1, 2013-2, 2013-3, 2013-4, 2013-6, 2013-7, 2013-8 The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Redwood
Residential Acquisition Corporation (the Servicing Administrator), hereby certifies as follows for the reporting period from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the Reporting Period):  (A)
a review of the Servicing Administrators activities during the Reporting Period, and its performance under the
Flow Mortgage Loan Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2011, between the Servicing Administrator and Cenlar FSB, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to the Flow Mortgage Loan Servicing Agreement, dated November 3, 2011 and Amendment
No. 2 to the Flow Mortgage Loan Servicing Agreement, dated August 13, 2014, and as modified by the related Acknowledgement (the Cenlar FSB Flow Servicing Agreement) and the respective Pooling and Servicing Agreements, has been
made under such officers supervision; and  (B)
to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicing Administrator has fulfilled all its obligations under
the Cenlar FSB Flow Servicing Agreement and the respective Pooling and Servicing Agreements, in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.  Very truly yours,REDWOOD RESIDENTIAL ACQUISITION
CORPORATION, Servicing AdministratorLOGOName:  Garnet W. KanouseTitle:     President




---

SCHEDULE A Sequoia Residential Funding, Inc. One Belvedere
Place Suite 330 Mill Valley, CA 94941 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 9062 Old Annapolis Road Columbia, MD 21045-1951 As Master Servicer for: SEMT 2012-1, 2012-2,
2012-3, 2012-4, 2012-5, 2012-6; and SEMT 2013-1, 2013-2,
2013-3, 2013-4, 2013-6 and 2013-7 CitiMortgage, Inc. 4050 Regent Blvd. Irving, TX 75063 As Master Servicer for SEMT 2013-8 Citibank, N.A. 388 Greenwich St., 14th Floor New York, NY 10013 As Securities Administrator for: SEMT 2012-1, 2012-2,
2012-3, 2012-4, 2012-5, 2012-6; and SEMT 2013-1, 2013-2,
2013-3, 2013-4, 2013-6 2013-7, 2013-8 U.S. Bank National Association EP-MN-WS3D 60 Livingston Avenue St. Paul, MN 55107 Attn: Structured Finance 
Sequoia As Trustee for SEMT 2012-1 and 2012-2 Christiana Trust, a division of Wilmington Savings Fund Society FSB 500 Delaware Avenue, 11th Floor Wilmington, DE 19801 Attention: Corporate Trust As Trustee for: SEMT 2012-3, 2012-4, 2012-5, 2012-6; and SEMT 2013-1, 2013-2,
2013-3, 2013-4, 2013-6 Wilmington Trust, National Association 1100 North
Market Street Wilmington, DE 19890 As Trustee
for SEMT 2013-7 and 2013-8
Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 9 Filed 10/13/2006 Page 1 of 1
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-14-00477- CR

Clem ente Suarez , Appellan t

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TO M GREEN CO UNTY, 51ST JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. CR92- 0713 -A, H ONO RAB LE B ARB ARA L. WALTH ER, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Appellant Clemente Suarez, appea ring pro se, seeks to a

ppeal from the trial court’s d enial of his motion for judgme nt nunc pro tunc. I n criminal case s, unless expressly aut h o ri z ed 1 by statute, appellate courts only have jurisdiction to revie w final judgmen t s . A p olinar v. State , 820 S.W .2d 792, 794 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); see Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 44.02 (“A defe ndant in any criminal action has the rig ht of appea l under the rules here inafter presc ribed

. . . .”). An order deny ing a m otion for judgment nunc pr o tunc is not a final, appe alable or der. See A bbott v. State , 271 S.W .3d 694, 697 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (no jurisdiction over appea l of post-judg ment order deny ing time-cre dit mo t ion); Deshotel v. State , No. 14-13-01093- CR, 2014 WL 51438, at *2

Suarez was convicted of murder in 1993, and this Court aff irmed that conviction on direc t 1 appe al

. See Suarez v. State , No. 03-93-00545- CR (Tex. App.—Austin Oct. 19, 1994, pet. ref ’d) (mem. op.) available at http:// www.se arc h.tx courts.g ov/Case.aspx? cn=03- 93-00545-CR.( T e x. A

p p . — H o u s to n [1 4 th D is t. ] Ja

n . 7 , 2 0 1 4 , n o p e t. ) ( me m. o p . , n o t desi g n a te d f o r p u b li c a ti o n ) (no appellate jurisdiction over denial of motion for judgme nt nu n c p ro t u n c); Castor v. State , 205 S.W .3d 666, 667 (Tex. App.—Waco 2006, no pet.) (same)

. Nor does the denial cre ate a rig ht
to an interlocutory appea l. Castor , 205 S.W .3d at 667

. Acc ording ly , we dismiss this appea l for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P . 43.2(f)

.

__________________________________________ Scott K. Field, Just ice
Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Pemberton, and F ield Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: September

25, 2014 Do Not Publish

2