PUBLIC LAW 109–366—OCT. 17, 2006

MILITARY COMMISSIONS ACT OF 2006

120 STAT. 2600 PUBLIC LAW 109–366—OCT. 17, 2006

Public Law 109–366

109th Congress

An Act

To authorize trial by military commission for violations of the law of war, and

for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.

(a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Military

Commissions Act of 2006’’.

(b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents for this Act

is as follows:

Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.

Sec. 2. Construction of Presidential authority to establish military commissions.

Sec. 3. Military commissions.

Sec. 4. Amendments to Uniform Code of Military Justice.

Sec. 5. Treaty obligations not establishing grounds for certain claims.

Sec. 6. Implementation of treaty obligations.

Sec. 7. Habeas corpus matters.

Sec. 8. Revisions to Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 relating to protection of certain

United States Government personnel.

Sec. 9. Review of judgments of military commissions.

Sec. 10. Detention covered by review of decisions of Combatant Status Review Tribunals of propriety of detention.

SEC. 2. CONSTRUCTION OF PRESIDENTIAL AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH

MILITARY COMMISSIONS.

The authority to establish military commissions under chapter

47A of title 10, United States Code, as added by section 3(a),

may not be construed to alter or limit the authority of the President

under the Constitution of the United States and laws of the United

States to establish military commissions for areas declared to be

under martial law or in occupied territories should circumstances

so require.

SEC. 3. MILITARY COMMISSIONS.

(a) MILITARY COMMISSIONS.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Subtitle A of title 10, United States Code,

is amended by inserting after chapter 47 the following new

chapter:

‘‘CHAPTER 47A—MILITARY COMMISSIONS

‘‘Subchapter

‘‘I. General Provisions ............................................................................................ 948a

‘‘II. Composition of Military Commissions ........................................................... 948h

‘‘III. Pre-Trial Procedure ........................................................................................ 948q

‘‘IV. Trial Procedure ............................................................................................... 949a

‘‘V. Sentences .......................................................................................................... 949s

10 USC 948a

note.

10 USC 948a

note.

Military

Commissions Act

of 2006.

Oct. 17, 2006

[S. 3930]

PUBLIC LAW 109–366—OCT. 17, 2006 120 STAT. 2601

‘‘VI. Post-Trial Procedure and Review of Military Commissions ........................ 950a

‘‘VII. Punitive Matters ........................................................................................... 950p

‘‘SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL PROVISIONS

‘‘Sec.

‘‘948a. Definitions.

‘‘948b. Military commissions generally.

‘‘948c. Persons subject to military commissions.

‘‘948d. Jurisdiction of military commissions.

‘‘948e. Annual report to congressional committees.

‘‘§ 948a. Definitions

‘‘In this chapter:

‘‘(1) UNLAWFUL ENEMY COMBATANT.—(A) The term ‘unlawful enemy combatant’ means—

‘‘(i) a person who has engaged in hostilities or who

has purposefully and materially supported hostilities

against the United States or its co-belligerents who is

not a lawful enemy combatant (including a person who

is part of the Taliban, al Qaeda, or associated forces);

or

‘‘(ii) a person who, before, on, or after the date of

the enactment of the Military Commissions Act of 2006,

has been determined to be an unlawful enemy combatant

by a Combatant Status Review Tribunal or another competent tribunal established under the authority of the

President or the Secretary of Defense.

‘‘(B) CO-BELLIGERENT.—In this paragraph, the term ‘cobelligerent’, with respect to the United States, means any State

or armed force joining and directly engaged with the United

States in hostilities or directly supporting hostilities against

a common enemy.

‘‘(2) LAWFUL ENEMY COMBATANT.—The term ‘lawful enemy

combatant’ means a person who is—

‘‘(A) a member of the regular forces of a State party

engaged in hostilities against the United States;

‘‘(B) a member of a militia, volunteer corps, or organized resistance movement belonging to a State party

engaged in such hostilities, which are under responsible

command, wear a fixed distinctive sign recognizable at

a distance, carry their arms openly, and abide by the

law of war; or

‘‘(C) a member of a regular armed force who professes

allegiance to a government engaged in such hostilities,

but not recognized by the United States.

‘‘(3) ALIEN.—The term ‘alien’ means a person who is not

a citizen of the United States.

‘‘(4) CLASSIFIED INFORMATION.—The term ‘classified

information’ means the following:

‘‘(A) Any information or material that has been determined by the United States Government pursuant to

statute, Executive order, or regulation to require protection

against unauthorized disclosure for reasons of national

security.

‘‘(B) Any restricted data, as that term is defined in

section 11 y. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C.

2014(y)).

120 STAT. 2602 PUBLIC LAW 109–366—OCT. 17, 2006

‘‘(5) GENEVA CONVENTIONS.—The term ‘Geneva Conventions’ means the international conventions signed at Geneva

on August 12, 1949.

‘‘§ 948b. Military commissions generally

‘‘(a) PURPOSE.—This chapter establishes procedures governing

the use of military commissions to try alien unlawful enemy combatants engaged in hostilities against the United States for violations

of the law of war and other offenses triable by military commission.

‘‘(b) AUTHORITY FOR MILITARY COMMISSIONS UNDER THIS

CHAPTER.—The President is authorized to establish military

commissions under this chapter for offenses triable by military

commission as provided in this chapter.

‘‘(c) CONSTRUCTION OF PROVISIONS.—The procedures for military commissions set forth in this chapter are based upon the

procedures for trial by general courts-martial under chapter 47

of this title (the Uniform Code of Military Justice). Chapter 47

of this title does not, by its terms, apply to trial by military commission except as specifically provided in this chapter. The judicial

construction and application of that chapter are not binding on

military commissions established under this chapter.

‘‘(d) INAPPLICABILITY OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS.—(1) The following provisions of this title shall not apply to trial by military

commission under this chapter:

‘‘(A) Section 810 (article 10 of the Uniform Code of Military

Justice), relating to speedy trial, including any rule of courtsmartial relating to speedy trial.

‘‘(B) Sections 831(a), (b), and (d) (articles 31(a), (b), and

(d) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), relating to compulsory self-incrimination.

‘‘(C) Section 832 (article 32 of the Uniform Code of Military

Justice), relating to pretrial investigation.

‘‘(2) Other provisions of chapter 47 of this title shall apply

to trial by military commission under this chapter only to the

extent provided by this chapter.

‘‘(e) TREATMENT OF RULINGS AND PRECEDENTS.—The findings,

holdings, interpretations, and other precedents of military commissions under this chapter may not be introduced or considered in

any hearing, trial, or other proceeding of a court-martial convened

under chapter 47 of this title. The findings, holdings, interpretations, and other precedents of military commissions under this

chapter may not form the basis of any holding, decision, or other

determination of a court-martial convened under that chapter.

‘‘(f) STATUS OF COMMISSIONS UNDER COMMON ARTICLE 3.—

A military commission established under this chapter is a regularly

constituted court, affording all the necessary ‘judicial guarantees

which are recognized as indispensable by civilized peoples’ for purposes of common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions.

‘‘(g) GENEVA CONVENTIONS NOT ESTABLISHING SOURCE OF

RIGHTS.—No alien unlawful enemy combatant subject to trial by

military commission under this chapter may invoke the Geneva

Conventions as a source of rights.

‘‘§ 948c. Persons subject to military commissions

‘‘Any alien unlawful enemy combatant is subject to trial by

military commission under this chapter.

Applicability.

President.

PUBLIC LAW 109–366—OCT. 17, 2006 120 STAT. 2603

‘‘§ 948d. Jurisdiction of military commissions

‘‘(a) JURISDICTION.—A military commission under this chapter

shall have jurisdiction to try any offense made punishable by this

chapter or the law of war when committed by an alien unlawful

enemy combatant before, on, or after September 11, 2001.

‘‘(b) LAWFUL ENEMY COMBATANTS.—Military commissions under

this chapter shall not have jurisdiction over lawful enemy combatants. Lawful enemy combatants who violate the law of war are

subject to chapter 47 of this title. Courts-martial established under

that chapter shall have jurisdiction to try a lawful enemy combatant

for any offense made punishable under this chapter.

‘‘(c) DETERMINATION OF UNLAWFUL ENEMY COMBATANT STATUS

DISPOSITIVE.—A finding, whether before, on, or after the date of

the enactment of the Military Commissions Act of 2006, by a

Combatant Status Review Tribunal or another competent tribunal

established under the authority of the President or the Secretary

of Defense that a person is an unlawful enemy combatant is dispositive for purposes of jurisdiction for trial by military commission

under this chapter.

‘‘(d) PUNISHMENTS.—A military commission under this chapter

may, under such limitations as the Secretary of Defense may prescribe, adjudge any punishment not forbidden by this chapter,

including the penalty of death when authorized under this chapter

or the law of war.

‘‘§ 948e. Annual report to congressional committees

‘‘(a) ANNUAL REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than December 31

each year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees

on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives

a report on any trials conducted by military commissions under

this chapter during such year.

‘‘(b) FORM.—Each report under this section shall be submitted

in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

‘‘SUBCHAPTER II—COMPOSITION OF MILITARY

COMMISSIONS

‘‘Sec.

‘‘948h. Who may convene military commissions.

‘‘948i. Who may serve on military commissions.

‘‘948j. Military judge of a military commission.

‘‘948k. Detail of trial counsel and defense counsel.

‘‘948l. Detail or employment of reporters and interpreters.

‘‘948m. Number of members; excuse of members; absent and additional members.

‘‘§ 948h. Who may convene military commissions

‘‘Military commissions under this chapter may be convened

by the Secretary of Defense or by any officer or official of the

United States designated by the Secretary for that purpose.

‘‘§ 948i. Who may serve on military commissions

‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Any commissioned officer of the armed forces

on active duty is eligible to serve on a military commission under

this chapter.

‘‘(b) DETAIL OF MEMBERS.—When convening a military commission under this chapter, the convening authority shall detail as

members of the commission such members of the armed forces

eligible under subsection (a), as in the opinion of the convening

120 STAT. 2604 PUBLIC LAW 109–366—OCT. 17, 2006

authority, are best qualified for the duty by reason of age, education,

training, experience, length of service, and judicial temperament.

No member of an armed force is eligible to serve as a member

of a military commission when such member is the accuser or

a witness for the prosecution or has acted as an investigator or

counsel in the same case.

‘‘(c) EXCUSE OF MEMBERS.—Before a military commission under

this chapter is assembled for the trial of a case, the convening

authority may excuse a member from participating in the case.

‘‘§ 948j. Military judge of a military commission

‘‘(a) DETAIL OF MILITARY JUDGE.—A military judge shall be

detailed to each military commission under this chapter. The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe regulations providing for the

manner in which military judges are so detailed to military commissions. The military judge shall preside over each military commission to which he has been detailed.

‘‘(b) QUALIFICATIONS.—A military judge shall be a commissioned

officer of the armed forces who is a member of the bar of a Federal

court, or a member of the bar of the highest court of a State,

and who is certified to be qualified for duty under section 826

of this title (article 26 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice)

as a military judge in general courts-martial by the Judge Advocate

General of the armed force of which such military judge is a

member.

‘‘(c) INELIGIBILITY OF CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS.—No person is

eligible to act as military judge in a case of a military commission

under this chapter if he is the accuser or a witness or has acted

as investigator or a counsel in the same case.

‘‘(d) CONSULTATION WITH MEMBERS; INELIGIBILITY TO VOTE.—

A military judge detailed to a military commission under this

chapter may not consult with the members of the commission

except in the presence of the accused (except as otherwise provided

in section 949d of this title), trial counsel, and defense counsel,

nor may he vote with the members of the commission.

‘‘(e) OTHER DUTIES.—A commissioned officer who is certified

to be qualified for duty as a military judge of a military commission

under this chapter may perform such other duties as are assigned

to him by or with the approval of the Judge Advocate General

of the armed force of which such officer is a member or the designee

of such Judge Advocate General.

‘‘(f) PROHIBITION ON EVALUATION OF FITNESS BY CONVENING

AUTHORITY.—The convening authority of a military commission

under this chapter shall not prepare or review any report concerning

the effectiveness, fitness, or efficiency of a military judge detailed

to the military commission which relates to his performance of

duty as a military judge on the military commission.

‘‘§ 948k. Detail of trial counsel and defense counsel

‘‘(a) DETAIL OF COUNSEL GENERALLY.—(1) Trial counsel and

military defense counsel shall be detailed for each military commission under this chapter.

‘‘(2) Assistant trial counsel and assistant and associate defense

counsel may be detailed for a military commission under this

chapter.

Regulations.

PUBLIC LAW 109–366—OCT. 17, 2006 120 STAT. 2605

‘‘(3) Military defense counsel for a military commission under

this chapter shall be detailed as soon as practicable after the

swearing of charges against the accused.

‘‘(4) The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe regulations providing for the manner in which trial counsel and military defense

counsel are detailed for military commissions under this chapter

and for the persons who are authorized to detail such counsel

for such commissions.

‘‘(b) TRIAL COUNSEL.—Subject to subsection (e), trial counsel

detailed for a military commission under this chapter must be—

‘‘(1) a judge advocate (as that term is defined in section

801 of this title (article 1 of the Uniform Code of Military

Justice) who—

‘‘(A) is a graduate of an accredited law school or is

a member of the bar of a Federal court or of the highest

court of a State; and

‘‘(B) is certified as competent to perform duties as

trial counsel before general courts-martial by the Judge

Advocate General of the armed force of which he is a

member; or

‘‘(2) a civilian who—

‘‘(A) is a member of the bar of a Federal court or

of the highest court of a State; and

‘‘(B) is otherwise qualified to practice before the military commission pursuant to regulations prescribed by the

Secretary of Defense.

‘‘(c) MILITARY DEFENSE COUNSEL.—Subject to subsection (e),

military defense counsel detailed for a military commission under

this chapter must be a judge advocate (as so defined) who is—

‘‘(1) a graduate of an accredited law school or is a member

of the bar of a Federal court or of the highest court of a

State; and

‘‘(2) certified as competent to perform duties as defense

counsel before general courts-martial by the Judge Advocate

General of the armed force of which he is a member.

‘‘(d) CHIEF PROSECUTOR; CHIEF DEFENSE COUNSEL.—(1) The

Chief Prosecutor in a military commission under this chapter shall

meet the requirements set forth in subsection (b)(1).

‘‘(2) The Chief Defense Counsel in a military commission under

this chapter shall meet the requirements set forth in subsection

(c)(1).

‘‘(e) INELIGIBILITY OF CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS.—No person who

has acted as an investigator, military judge, or member of a military

commission under this chapter in any case may act later as trial

counsel or military defense counsel in the same case. No person

who has acted for the prosecution before a military commission

under this chapter may act later in the same case for the defense,

nor may any person who has acted for the defense before a military

commission under this chapter act later in the same case for the

prosecution.

‘‘§ 948l. Detail or employment of reporters and interpreters

‘‘(a) COURT REPORTERS.—Under such regulations as the Secretary of Defense may prescribe, the convening authority of a military commission under this chapter shall detail to or employ for

the commission qualified court reporters, who shall make a verbatim

Regulations.

120 STAT. 2606 PUBLIC LAW 109–366—OCT. 17, 2006

recording of the proceedings of and testimony taken before the

commission.

‘‘(b) INTERPRETERS.—Under such regulations as the Secretary

of Defense may prescribe, the convening authority of a military

commission under this chapter may detail to or employ for the

military commission interpreters who shall interpret for the

commission and, as necessary, for trial counsel and defense counsel

and for the accused.

‘‘(c) TRANSCRIPT; RECORD.—The transcript of a military commission under this chapter shall be under the control of the convening

authority of the commission, who shall also be responsible for

preparing the record of the proceedings.

‘‘§ 948m. Number of members; excuse of members; absent

and additional members

‘‘(a) NUMBER OF MEMBERS.—(1) A military commission under

this chapter shall, except as provided in paragraph (2), have at

least five members.

‘‘(2) In a case in which the accused before a military commission

under this chapter may be sentenced to a penalty of death, the

military commission shall have the number of members prescribed

by section 949m(c) of this title.

‘‘(b) EXCUSE OF MEMBERS.—No member of a military commission under this chapter may be absent or excused after the military

commission has been assembled for the trial of a case unless

excused—

‘‘(1) as a result of challenge;

‘‘(2) by the military judge for physical disability or other

good cause; or

‘‘(3) by order of the convening authority for good cause.

‘‘(c) ABSENT AND ADDITIONAL MEMBERS.—Whenever a military

commission under this chapter is reduced below the number of

members required by subsection (a), the trial may not proceed

unless the convening authority details new members sufficient to

provide not less than such number. The trial may proceed with

the new members present after the recorded evidence previously

introduced before the members has been read to the military

commission in the presence of the military judge, the accused

(except as provided in section 949d of this title), and counsel for

both sides.

‘‘SUBCHAPTER III—PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURE

‘‘Sec.

‘‘948q. Charges and specifications.

‘‘948r. Compulsory self-incrimination prohibited; treatment of statements obtained

by torture and other statements. ‘‘948s. Service of charges.

‘‘§ 948q. Charges and specifications

‘‘(a) CHARGES AND SPECIFICATIONS.—Charges and specifications

against an accused in a military commission under this chapter

shall be signed by a person subject to chapter 47 of this title

under oath before a commissioned officer of the armed forces authorized to administer oaths and shall state—

‘‘(1) that the signer has personal knowledge of, or reason

to believe, the matters set forth therein; and

‘‘(2) that they are true in fact to the best of the signer’s

knowledge and belief.

PUBLIC LAW 109–366—OCT. 17, 2006 120 STAT. 2607

‘‘(b) NOTICE TO ACCUSED.—Upon the swearing of the charges

and specifications in accordance with subsection (a), the accused

shall be informed of the charges against him as soon as practicable.

‘‘§ 948r. Compulsory self-incrimination prohibited; treatment

of statements obtained by torture and other

statements

‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—No person shall be required to testify against

himself at a proceeding of a military commission under this chapter.

‘‘(b) EXCLUSION OF STATEMENTS OBTAINED BY TORTURE.—A

statement obtained by use of torture shall not be admissible in

a military commission under this chapter, except against a person

accused of torture as evidence that the statement was made.

‘‘(c) STATEMENTS OBTAINED BEFORE ENACTMENT OF DETAINEE

TREATMENT ACT OF 2005.—A statement obtained before December

30, 2005 (the date of the enactment of the Defense Treatment

Act of 2005) in which the degree of coercion is disputed may be

admitted only if the military judge finds that—

‘‘(1) the totality of the circumstances renders the statement

reliable and possessing sufficient probative value; and

‘‘(2) the interests of justice would best be served by admission of the statement into evidence.

‘‘(d) STATEMENTS OBTAINED AFTER ENACTMENT OF DETAINEE

TREATMENT ACT OF 2005.—A statement obtained on or after

December 30, 2005 (the date of the enactment of the Defense

Treatment Act of 2005) in which the degree of coercion is disputed

may be admitted only if the military judge finds that—

‘‘(1) the totality of the circumstances renders the statement

reliable and possessing sufficient probative value;

‘‘(2) the interests of justice would best be served by admission of the statement into evidence; and

‘‘(3) the interrogation methods used to obtain the statement

do not amount to cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment

prohibited by section 1003 of the Detainee Treatment Act of

2005.

‘‘§ 948s. Service of charges

‘‘The trial counsel assigned to a case before a military commission under this chapter shall cause to be served upon the accused

and military defense counsel a copy of the charges upon which

trial is to be had. Such charges shall be served in English and,

if appropriate, in another language that the accused understands.

Such service shall be made sufficiently in advance of trial to prepare

a defense.

‘‘SUBCHAPTER IV—TRIAL PROCEDURE

‘‘Sec.

‘‘949a. Rules.

‘‘949b. Unlawfully influencing action of military commission.

‘‘949c. Duties of trial counsel and defense counsel.

‘‘949d. Sessions.

‘‘949e. Continuances.

‘‘949f. Challenges.

‘‘949g. Oaths.

‘‘949h. Former jeopardy.

‘‘949i. Pleas of the accused.

‘‘949j. Opportunity to obtain witnesses and other evidence.

‘‘949k. Defense of lack of mental responsibility.

‘‘949l. Voting and rulings.

120 STAT. 2608 PUBLIC LAW 109–366—OCT. 17, 2006

‘‘949m. Number of votes required.

‘‘949n. Military commission to announce action.

‘‘949o. Record of trial.

‘‘§ 949a. Rules

‘‘(a) PROCEDURES AND RULES OF EVIDENCE.—Pretrial, trial, and

post-trial procedures, including elements and modes of proof, for

cases triable by military commission under this chapter may be

prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the

Attorney General. Such procedures shall, so far as the Secretary

considers practicable or consistent with military or intelligence

activities, apply the principles of law and the rules of evidence

in trial by general courts-martial. Such procedures and rules of

evidence may not be contrary to or inconsistent with this chapter.

‘‘(b) RULES FOR MILITARY COMMISSION.—(1) Notwithstanding

any departures from the law and the rules of evidence in trial

by general courts-martial authorized by subsection (a), the procedures and rules of evidence in trials by military commission under

this chapter shall include the following:

‘‘(A) The accused shall be permitted to present evidence

in his defense, to cross-examine the witnesses who testify

against him, and to examine and respond to evidence admitted

against him on the issue of guilt or innocence and for sentencing, as provided for by this chapter.

‘‘(B) The accused shall be present at all sessions of the

military commission (other than those for deliberations or

voting), except when excluded under section 949d of this title.

‘‘(C) The accused shall receive the assistance of counsel

as provided for by section 948k.

‘‘(D) The accused shall be permitted to represent himself,

as provided for by paragraph (3).

‘‘(2) In establishing procedures and rules of evidence for military

commission proceedings, the Secretary of Defense may prescribe

the following provisions:

‘‘(A) Evidence shall be admissible if the military judge

determines that the evidence would have probative value to

a reasonable person.

‘‘(B) Evidence shall not be excluded from trial by military

commission on the grounds that the evidence was not seized

pursuant to a search warrant or other authorization.

‘‘(C) A statement of the accused that is otherwise admissible

shall not be excluded from trial by military commission on

grounds of alleged coercion or compulsory self-incrimination

so long as the evidence complies with the provisions of section

948r of this title.

‘‘(D) Evidence shall be admitted as authentic so long as—

‘‘(i) the military judge of the military commission determines that there is sufficient basis to find that the evidence

is what it is claimed to be; and

‘‘(ii) the military judge instructs the members that

they may consider any issue as to authentication or identification of evidence in determining the weight, if any, to

be given to the evidence.

‘‘(E)(i) Except as provided in clause (ii), hearsay evidence

not otherwise admissible under the rules of evidence applicable

in trial by general courts-martial may be admitted in a trial

by military commission if the proponent of the evidence makes

known to the adverse party, sufficiently in advance to provide

Applicability.

PUBLIC LAW 109–366—OCT. 17, 2006 120 STAT. 2609

the adverse party with a fair opportunity to meet the evidence,

the intention of the proponent to offer the evidence, and the

particulars of the evidence (including information on the general circumstances under which the evidence was obtained).

The disclosure of evidence under the preceding sentence is

subject to the requirements and limitations applicable to the

disclosure of classified information in section 949j(c) of this

title.

‘‘(ii) Hearsay evidence not otherwise admissible under the

rules of evidence applicable in trial by general courts-martial

shall not be admitted in a trial by military commission if

the party opposing the admission of the evidence demonstrates

that the evidence is unreliable or lacking in probative value.

‘‘(F) The military judge shall exclude any evidence the

probative value of which is substantially outweighed—

‘‘(i) by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of

the issues, or misleading the commission; or

‘‘(ii) by considerations of undue delay, waste of time,

or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.

‘‘(3)(A) The accused in a military commission under this chapter

who exercises the right to self-representation under paragraph

(1)(D) shall conform his deportment and the conduct of the defense

to the rules of evidence, procedure, and decorum applicable to

trials by military commission.

‘‘(B) Failure of the accused to conform to the rules described

in subparagraph (A) may result in a partial or total revocation

by the military judge of the right of self-representation under paragraph (1)(D). In such case, the detailed defense counsel of the

accused or an appropriately authorized civilian counsel shall perform the functions necessary for the defense.

‘‘(c) DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY TO PRESCRIBE REGULATIONS.—

The Secretary of Defense may delegate the authority of the Secretary to prescribe regulations under this chapter.

‘‘(d) NOTIFICATION TO CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES OF CHANGES

TO PROCEDURES.—Not later than 60 days before the date on which

any proposed modification of the procedures in effect for military

commissions under this chapter goes into effect, the Secretary of

Defense shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the

Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of

Representatives a report describing the modification.

‘‘§ 949b. Unlawfully influencing action of military commission

‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—(1) No authority convening a military

commission under this chapter may censure, reprimand, or

admonish the military commission, or any member, military judge,

or counsel thereof, with respect to the findings or sentence adjudged

by the military commission, or with respect to any other exercises

of its or his functions in the conduct of the proceedings.

‘‘(2) No person may attempt to coerce or, by any unauthorized

means, influence—

‘‘(A) the action of a military commission under this chapter,

or any member thereof, in reaching the findings or sentence

in any case;

‘‘(B) the action of any convening, approving, or reviewing

authority with respect to his judicial acts; or

‘‘(C) the exercise of professional judgment by trial counsel

or defense counsel.

Deadline.

120 STAT. 2610 PUBLIC LAW 109–366—OCT. 17, 2006

‘‘(3) Paragraphs (1) and (2) do not apply with respect to—

‘‘(A) general instructional or informational courses in military justice if such courses are designed solely for the purpose

of instructing members of a command in the substantive and

procedural aspects of military commissions; or

‘‘(B) statements and instructions given in open proceedings

by a military judge or counsel.

‘‘(b) PROHIBITION ON CONSIDERATION OF ACTIONS ON COMMIS- SION IN EVALUATION OF FITNESS.—In the preparation of an effectiveness, fitness, or efficiency report or any other report or document

used in whole or in part for the purpose of determining whether

a commissioned officer of the armed forces is qualified to be

advanced in grade, or in determining the assignment or transfer

of any such officer or whether any such officer should be retained

on active duty, no person may—

‘‘(1) consider or evaluate the performance of duty of any

member of a military commission under this chapter; or

‘‘(2) give a less favorable rating or evaluation to any

commissioned officer because of the zeal with which such officer,

in acting as counsel, represented any accused before a military

commission under this chapter.

‘‘§ 949c. Duties of trial counsel and defense counsel

‘‘(a) TRIAL COUNSEL.—The trial counsel of a military commission under this chapter shall prosecute in the name of the United

States.

‘‘(b) DEFENSE COUNSEL.—(1) The accused shall be represented

in his defense before a military commission under this chapter

as provided in this subsection.

‘‘(2) The accused shall be represented by military counsel

detailed under section 948k of this title.

‘‘(3) The accused may be represented by civilian counsel if

retained by the accused, but only if such civilian counsel—

‘‘(A) is a United States citizen;

‘‘(B) is admitted to the practice of law in a State, district,

or possession of the United States or before a Federal court;

‘‘(C) has not been the subject of any sanction of disciplinary

action by any court, bar, or other competent governmental

authority for relevant misconduct;

‘‘(D) has been determined to be eligible for access to classified information that is classified at the level Secret or higher;

and

‘‘(E) has signed a written agreement to comply with all

applicable regulations or instructions for counsel, including any

rules of court for conduct during the proceedings.

‘‘(4) Civilian defense counsel shall protect any classified

information received during the course of representation of the

accused in accordance with all applicable law governing the protection of classified information and may not divulge such information

to any person not authorized to receive it.

‘‘(5) If the accused is represented by civilian counsel, detailed

military counsel shall act as associate counsel.

‘‘(6) The accused is not entitled to be represented by more

than one military counsel. However, the person authorized under

regulations prescribed under section 948k of this title to detail

counsel, in that person’s sole discretion, may detail additional military counsel to represent the accused.

PUBLIC LAW 109–366—OCT. 17, 2006 120 STAT. 2611

‘‘(7) Defense counsel may cross-examine each witness for the

prosecution who testifies before a military commission under this

chapter.

‘‘§ 949d. Sessions

‘‘(a) SESSIONS WITHOUT PRESENCE OF MEMBERS.—(1) At any

time after the service of charges which have been referred for

trial by military commission under this chapter, the military judge

may call the military commission into session without the presence

of the members for the purpose of—

‘‘(A) hearing and determining motions raising defenses or

objections which are capable of determination without trial

of the issues raised by a plea of not guilty;

‘‘(B) hearing and ruling upon any matter which may be

ruled upon by the military judge under this chapter, whether

or not the matter is appropriate for later consideration or

decision by the members;

‘‘(C) if permitted by regulations prescribed by the Secretary

of Defense, receiving the pleas of the accused; and

‘‘(D) performing any other procedural function which may

be performed by the military judge under this chapter or under

rules prescribed pursuant to section 949a of this title and

which does not require the presence of the members.

‘‘(2) Except as provided in subsections (c) and (e), any proceedings under paragraph (1) shall—

‘‘(A) be conducted in the presence of the accused, defense

counsel, and trial counsel; and

‘‘(B) be made part of the record.

‘‘(b) PROCEEDINGS IN PRESENCE OF ACCUSED.—Except as provided in subsections (c) and (e), all proceedings of a military commission under this chapter, including any consultation of the members

with the military judge or counsel, shall—

‘‘(1) be in the presence of the accused, defense counsel,

and trial counsel; and

‘‘(2) be made a part of the record.

‘‘(c) DELIBERATION OR VOTE OF MEMBERS.—When the members

of a military commission under this chapter deliberate or vote,

only the members may be present.

‘‘(d) CLOSURE OF PROCEEDINGS.—(1) The military judge may

close to the public all or part of the proceedings of a military

commission under this chapter, but only in accordance with this

subsection.

‘‘(2) The military judge may close to the public all or a portion

of the proceedings under paragraph (1) only upon making a specific

finding that such closure is necessary to—

‘‘(A) protect information the disclosure of which could

reasonably be expected to cause damage to the national security, including intelligence or law enforcement sources, methods,

or activities; or

‘‘(B) ensure the physical safety of individuals.

‘‘(3) A finding under paragraph (2) may be based upon a presentation, including a presentation ex parte or in camera, by either

trial counsel or defense counsel.

‘‘(e) EXCLUSION OF ACCUSED FROM CERTAIN PROCEEDINGS.—

The military judge may exclude the accused from any portion of

a proceeding upon a determination that, after being warned by

120 STAT. 2612 PUBLIC LAW 109–366—OCT. 17, 2006

the military judge, the accused persists in conduct that justifies

exclusion from the courtroom—

‘‘(1) to ensure the physical safety of individuals; or

‘‘(2) to prevent disruption of the proceedings by the accused.

‘‘(f) PROTECTION OF CLASSIFIED INFORMATION.— ‘‘(1) NATIONAL SECURITY PRIVILEGE.—(A) Classified

information shall be protected and is privileged from disclosure

if disclosure would be detrimental to the national security.

The rule in the preceding sentence applies to all stages of

the proceedings of military commissions under this chapter.

‘‘(B) The privilege referred to in subparagraph (A) may

be claimed by the head of the executive or military department

or government agency concerned based on a finding by the

head of that department or agency that—

‘‘(i) the information is properly classified; and

‘‘(ii) disclosure of the information would be detrimental

to the national security.

‘‘(C) A person who may claim the privilege referred to

in subparagraph (A) may authorize a representative, witness,

or trial counsel to claim the privilege and make the finding

described in subparagraph (B) on behalf of such person. The

authority of the representative, witness, or trial counsel to

do so is presumed in the absence of evidence to the contrary.

‘‘(2) INTRODUCTION OF CLASSIFIED INFORMATION.—

‘‘(A) ALTERNATIVES TO DISCLOSURE.—To protect classified information from disclosure, the military judge, upon

motion of trial counsel, shall authorize, to the extent

practicable—

‘‘(i) the deletion of specified items of classified

information from documents to be introduced as evidence before the military commission;

‘‘(ii) the substitution of a portion or summary of

the information for such classified documents; or

‘‘(iii) the substitution of a statement of relevant

facts that the classified information would tend to

prove.

‘‘(B) PROTECTION OF SOURCES, METHODS, OR ACTIVITIES.—The military judge, upon motion of trial counsel,

shall permit trial counsel to introduce otherwise admissible

evidence before the military commission, while protecting

from disclosure the sources, methods, or activities by which

the United States acquired the evidence if the military

judge finds that (i) the sources, methods, or activities by

which the United States acquired the evidence are classified, and (ii) the evidence is reliable. The military judge

may require trial counsel to present to the military commission and the defense, to the extent practicable and consistent with national security, an unclassified summary

of the sources, methods, or activities by which the United

States acquired the evidence.

‘‘(C) ASSERTION OF NATIONAL SECURITY PRIVILEGE AT

TRIAL.—During the examination of any witness, trial

counsel may object to any question, line of inquiry, or

motion to admit evidence that would require the disclosure

of classified information. Following such an objection, the

military judge shall take suitable action to safeguard such

classified information. Such action may include the review

PUBLIC LAW 109–366—OCT. 17, 2006 120 STAT. 2613

of trial counsel’s claim of privilege by the military judge

in camera and on an ex parte basis, and the delay of

proceedings to permit trial counsel to consult with the

department or agency concerned as to whether the national

security privilege should be asserted.

‘‘(3) CONSIDERATION OF PRIVILEGE AND RELATED MATE- RIALS.—A claim of privilege under this subsection, and any

materials submitted in support thereof, shall, upon request

of the Government, be considered by the military judge in

camera and shall not be disclosed to the accused.

‘‘(4) ADDITIONAL REGULATIONS.—The Secretary of Defense

may prescribe additional regulations, consistent with this subsection, for the use and protection of classified information

during proceedings of military commissions under this chapter.

A report on any regulations so prescribed, or modified, shall

be submitted to the Committees on Armed Services of the

Senate and the House of Representatives not later than 60

days before the date on which such regulations or modifications,

as the case may be, go into effect.

‘‘§ 949e. Continuances

‘‘The military judge in a military commission under this chapter

may, for reasonable cause, grant a continuance to any party for

such time, and as often, as may appear to be just.

‘‘§ 949f. Challenges

‘‘(a) CHALLENGES AUTHORIZED.—The military judge and members of a military commission under this chapter may be challenged

by the accused or trial counsel for cause stated to the commission.

The military judge shall determine the relevance and validity of

challenges for cause. The military judge may not receive a challenge

to more than one person at a time. Challenges by trial counsel

shall ordinarily be presented and decided before those by the

accused are offered.

‘‘(b) PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES.—Each accused and the trial

counsel are entitled to one peremptory challenge. The military

judge may not be challenged except for cause.

‘‘(c) CHALLENGES AGAINST ADDITIONAL MEMBERS.—Whenever

additional members are detailed to a military commission under

this chapter, and after any challenges for cause against such additional members are presented and decided, each accused and the

trial counsel are entitled to one peremptory challenge against members not previously subject to peremptory challenge.

‘‘§ 949g. Oaths

‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—(1) Before performing their respective duties

in a military commission under this chapter, military judges, members, trial counsel, defense counsel, reporters, and interpreters shall

take an oath to perform their duties faithfully.

‘‘(2) The form of the oath required by paragraph (1), the time

and place of the taking thereof, the manner of recording the same,

and whether the oath shall be taken for all cases in which duties

are to be performed or for a particular case, shall be as prescribed

in regulations of the Secretary of Defense. Those regulations may

provide that—

‘‘(A) an oath to perform faithfully duties as a military

judge, trial counsel, or defense counsel may be taken at any

Regulations.

Reports.

Deadline.

120 STAT. 2614 PUBLIC LAW 109–366—OCT. 17, 2006

time by any judge advocate or other person certified to be

qualified or competent for the duty; and

‘‘(B) if such an oath is taken, such oath need not again

be taken at the time the judge advocate or other person is

detailed to that duty.

‘‘(b) WITNESSES.—Each witness before a military commission

under this chapter shall be examined on oath.

‘‘§ 949h. Former jeopardy

‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—No person may, without his consent, be

tried by a military commission under this chapter a second time

for the same offense.

‘‘(b) SCOPE OF TRIAL.—No proceeding in which the accused

has been found guilty by military commission under this chapter

upon any charge or specification is a trial in the sense of this

section until the finding of guilty has become final after review

of the case has been fully completed.

‘‘§ 949i. Pleas of the accused

‘‘(a) ENTRY OF PLEA OF NOT GUILTY.—If an accused in a military

commission under this chapter after a plea of guilty sets up matter

inconsistent with the plea, or if it appears that the accused has

entered the plea of guilty through lack of understanding of its

meaning and effect, or if the accused fails or refuses to plead,

a plea of not guilty shall be entered in the record, and the military

commission shall proceed as though the accused had pleaded not

guilty.

‘‘(b) FINDING OF GUILT AFTER GUILTY PLEA.—With respect to

any charge or specification to which a plea of guilty has been

made by the accused in a military commission under this chapter

and accepted by the military judge, a finding of guilty of the

charge or specification may be entered immediately without a vote.

The finding shall constitute the finding of the commission unless

the plea of guilty is withdrawn prior to announcement of the sentence, in which event the proceedings shall continue as though

the accused had pleaded not guilty.

‘‘§ 949j. Opportunity to obtain witnesses and other evidence

‘‘(a) RIGHT OF DEFENSE COUNSEL.—Defense counsel in a military commission under this chapter shall have a reasonable opportunity to obtain witnesses and other evidence as provided in regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense.

‘‘(b) PROCESS FOR COMPULSION.—Process issued in a military

commission under this chapter to compel witnesses to appear and

testify and to compel the production of other evidence—

‘‘(1) shall be similar to that which courts of the United

States having criminal jurisdiction may lawfully issue; and

‘‘(2) shall run to any place where the United States shall

have jurisdiction thereof.

‘‘(c) PROTECTION OF CLASSIFIED INFORMATION.—(1) With respect

to the discovery obligations of trial counsel under this section,

the military judge, upon motion of trial counsel, shall authorize,

to the extent practicable—

‘‘(A) the deletion of specified items of classified information

from documents to be made available to the accused;

‘‘(B) the substitution of a portion or summary of the

information for such classified documents; or

Regulations.

PUBLIC LAW 109–366—OCT. 17, 2006 120 STAT. 2615

‘‘(C) the substitution of a statement admitting relevant

facts that the classified information would tend to prove.

‘‘(2) The military judge, upon motion of trial counsel, shall

authorize trial counsel, in the course of complying with discovery

obligations under this section, to protect from disclosure the sources,

methods, or activities by which the United States acquired evidence

if the military judge finds that the sources, methods, or activities

by which the United States acquired such evidence are classified.

The military judge may require trial counsel to provide, to the

extent practicable, an unclassified summary of the sources, methods,

or activities by which the United States acquired such evidence.

‘‘(d) EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE.—(1) As soon as practicable, trial

counsel shall disclose to the defense the existence of any evidence

known to trial counsel that reasonably tends to exculpate the

accused. Where exculpatory evidence is classified, the accused shall

be provided with an adequate substitute in accordance with the

procedures under subsection (c).

‘‘(2) In this subsection, the term ‘evidence known to trial

counsel’, in the case of exculpatory evidence, means exculpatory

evidence that the prosecution would be required to disclose in

a trial by general court-martial under chapter 47 of this title.

‘‘§ 949k. Defense of lack of mental responsibility

‘‘(a) AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE.—It is an affirmative defense in

a trial by military commission under this chapter that, at the

time of the commission of the acts constituting the offense, the

accused, as a result of a severe mental disease or defect, was

unable to appreciate the nature and quality or the wrongfulness

of the acts. Mental disease or defect does not otherwise constitute

a defense.

‘‘(b) BURDEN OF PROOF.—The accused in a military commission

under this chapter has the burden of proving the defense of lack

of mental responsibility by clear and convincing evidence.

‘‘(c) FINDINGS FOLLOWING ASSERTION OF DEFENSE.—Whenever

lack of mental responsibility of the accused with respect to an

offense is properly at issue in a military commission under this

chapter, the military judge shall instruct the members of the

commission as to the defense of lack of mental responsibility under

this section and shall charge them to find the accused—

‘‘(1) guilty;

‘‘(2) not guilty; or

‘‘(3) subject to subsection (d), not guilty by reason of lack

of mental responsibility.

‘‘(d) MAJORITY VOTE REQUIRED FOR FINDING.—The accused shall

be found not guilty by reason of lack of mental responsibility under

subsection (c)(3) only if a majority of the members present at

the time the vote is taken determines that the defense of lack

of mental responsibility has been established.

‘‘§ 949l. Voting and rulings

‘‘(a) VOTE BY SECRET WRITTEN BALLOT.—Voting by members

of a military commission under this chapter on the findings and

on the sentence shall be by secret written ballot.

‘‘(b) RULINGS.—(1) The military judge in a military commission

under this chapter shall rule upon all questions of law, including

the admissibility of evidence and all interlocutory questions arising

during the proceedings.

120 STAT. 2616 PUBLIC LAW 109–366—OCT. 17, 2006

‘‘(2) Any ruling made by the military judge upon a question

of law or an interlocutory question (other than the factual issue

of mental responsibility of the accused) is conclusive and constitutes

the ruling of the military commission. However, a military judge

may change his ruling at any time during the trial.

‘‘(c) INSTRUCTIONS PRIOR TO VOTE.—Before a vote is taken

of the findings of a military commission under this chapter, the

military judge shall, in the presence of the accused and counsel,

instruct the members as to the elements of the offense and charge

the members—

‘‘(1) that the accused must be presumed to be innocent

until his guilt is established by legal and competent evidence

beyond a reasonable doubt;

‘‘(2) that in the case being considered, if there is a reasonable doubt as to the guilt of the accused, the doubt must

be resolved in favor of the accused and he must be acquitted;

‘‘(3) that, if there is reasonable doubt as to the degree

of guilt, the finding must be in a lower degree as to which

there is no reasonable doubt; and

‘‘(4) that the burden of proof to establish the guilt of the

accused beyond a reasonable doubt is upon the United States.

‘‘§ 949m. Number of votes required

‘‘(a) CONVICTION.—No person may be convicted by a military

commission under this chapter of any offense, except as provided

in section 949i(b) of this title or by concurrence of two-thirds of

the members present at the time the vote is taken.

‘‘(b) SENTENCES.—(1) No person may be sentenced by a military

commission to suffer death, except insofar as—

‘‘(A) the penalty of death is expressly authorized under

this chapter or the law of war for an offense of which the

accused has been found guilty;

‘‘(B) trial counsel expressly sought the penalty of death

by filing an appropriate notice in advance of trial;

‘‘(C) the accused is convicted of the offense by the concurrence of all the members present at the time the vote is taken;

and

‘‘(D) all the members present at the time the vote is taken

concur in the sentence of death.

‘‘(2) No person may be sentenced to life imprisonment, or to

confinement for more than 10 years, by a military commission

under this chapter except by the concurrence of three-fourths of

the members present at the time the vote is taken.

‘‘(3) All other sentences shall be determined by a military

commission by the concurrence of two-thirds of the members present

at the time the vote is taken.

‘‘(c) NUMBER OF MEMBERS REQUIRED FOR PENALTY OF DEATH.—

(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), in a case in which the

penalty of death is sought, the number of members of the military

commission under this chapter shall be not less than 12.

‘‘(2) In any case described in paragraph (1) in which 12 members

are not reasonably available because of physical conditions or military exigencies, the convening authority shall specify a lesser

number of members for the military commission (but not fewer

than 9 members), and the military commission may be assembled,

and the trial held, with not fewer than the number of members

so specified. In such a case, the convening authority shall make

PUBLIC LAW 109–366—OCT. 17, 2006 120 STAT. 2617

a detailed written statement, to be appended to the record, stating

why a greater number of members were not reasonably available.

‘‘§ 949n. Military commission to announce action

‘‘A military commission under this chapter shall announce its

findings and sentence to the parties as soon as determined.

‘‘§ 949o. Record of trial

‘‘(a) RECORD; AUTHENTICATION.—Each military commission

under this chapter shall keep a separate, verbatim, record of the

proceedings in each case brought before it, and the record shall

be authenticated by the signature of the military judge. If the

record cannot be authenticated by the military judge by reason

of his death, disability, or absence, it shall be authenticated by

the signature of the trial counsel or by a member of the commission

if the trial counsel is unable to authenticate it by reason of his

death, disability, or absence. Where appropriate, and as provided

in regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, the record

of a military commission under this chapter may contain a classified

annex.

‘‘(b) COMPLETE RECORD REQUIRED.—A complete record of the

proceedings and testimony shall be prepared in every military

commission under this chapter.

‘‘(c) PROVISION OF COPY TO ACCUSED.—A copy of the record

of the proceedings of the military commission under this chapter

shall be given the accused as soon as it is authenticated. If the

record contains classified information, or a classified annex, the

accused shall be given a redacted version of the record consistent

with the requirements of section 949d of this title. Defense counsel

shall have access to the unredacted record, as provided in regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense.

‘‘SUBCHAPTER V—SENTENCES

‘‘Sec.

‘‘949s. Cruel or unusual punishments prohibited.

‘‘949t. Maximum limits.

‘‘949u. Execution of confinement.

‘‘§ 949s. Cruel or unusual punishments prohibited

‘‘Punishment by flogging, or by branding, marking, or tattooing

on the body, or any other cruel or unusual punishment, may not

be adjudged by a military commission under this chapter or inflicted

under this chapter upon any person subject to this chapter. The

use of irons, single or double, except for the purpose of safe custody,

is prohibited under this chapter.

‘‘§ 949t. Maximum limits

‘‘The punishment which a military commission under this

chapter may direct for an offense may not exceed such limits as

the President or Secretary of Defense may prescribe for that offense.

‘‘§ 949u. Execution of confinement

‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Under such regulations as the Secretary

of Defense may prescribe, a sentence of confinement adjudged by

a military commission under this chapter may be carried into

execution by confinement—

‘‘(1) in any place of confinement under the control of any

of the armed forces; or

Regulations.

Regulations.

120 STAT. 2618 PUBLIC LAW 109–366—OCT. 17, 2006

‘‘(2) in any penal or correctional institution under the control of the United States or its allies, or which the United

States may be allowed to use.

‘‘(b) TREATMENT DURING CONFINEMENT BY OTHER THAN THE

ARMED FORCES.—Persons confined under subsection (a)(2) in a

penal or correctional institution not under the control of an armed

force are subject to the same discipline and treatment as persons

confined or committed by the courts of the United States or of

the State, District of Columbia, or place in which the institution

is situated.

‘‘SUBCHAPTER VI—POST-TRIAL PROCEDURE AND REVIEW

OF MILITARY COMMISSIONS

‘‘Sec.

‘‘950a. Error of law; lesser included offense.

‘‘950b. Review by the convening authority.

‘‘950c. Appellate referral; waiver or withdrawal of appeal.

‘‘950d. Appeal by the United States.

‘‘950e. Rehearings.

‘‘950f. Review by Court of Military Commission Review.

‘‘950g. Review by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia

Circuit and the Supreme Court.

‘‘950h. Appellate counsel.

‘‘950i. Execution of sentence; procedures for execution of sentence of death.

‘‘950j. Finality or proceedings, findings, and sentences.

‘‘§ 950a. Error of law; lesser included offense

‘‘(a) ERROR OF LAW.—A finding or sentence of a military

commission under this chapter may not be held incorrect on the

ground of an error of law unless the error materially prejudices

the substantial rights of the accused.

‘‘(b) LESSER INCLUDED OFFENSE.—Any reviewing authority with

the power to approve or affirm a finding of guilty by a military

commission under this chapter may approve or affirm, instead,

so much of the finding as includes a lesser included offense.

‘‘§ 950b. Review by the convening authority

‘‘(a) NOTICE TO CONVENING AUTHORITY OF FINDINGS AND SENTENCE.—The findings and sentence of a military commission under

this chapter shall be reported in writing promptly to the convening

authority after the announcement of the sentence.

‘‘(b) SUBMITTAL OF MATTERS BY ACCUSED TO CONVENING

AUTHORITY.—(1) The accused may submit to the convening

authority matters for consideration by the convening authority with

respect to the findings and the sentence of the military commission

under this chapter.

‘‘(2)(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), a submittal

under paragraph (1) shall be made in writing within 20 days

after the accused has been given an authenticated record of trial

under section 949o(c) of this title.

‘‘(B) If the accused shows that additional time is required

for the accused to make a submittal under paragraph (1), the

convening authority may, for good cause, extend the applicable

period under subparagraph (A) for not more than an additional

20 days.

‘‘(3) The accused may waive his right to make a submittal

to the convening authority under paragraph (1). Such a waiver

shall be made in writing and may not be revoked. For the purposes

of subsection (c)(2), the time within which the accused may make

Deadline.

PUBLIC LAW 109–366—OCT. 17, 2006 120 STAT. 2619

a submittal under this subsection shall be deemed to have expired

upon the submittal of a waiver under this paragraph to the convening authority.

‘‘(c) ACTION BY CONVENING AUTHORITY.—(1) The authority

under this subsection to modify the findings and sentence of a

military commission under this chapter is a matter of the sole

discretion and prerogative of the convening authority.

‘‘(2)(A) The convening authority shall take action on the sentence of a military commission under this chapter.

‘‘(B) Subject to regulations prescribed by the Secretary of

Defense, action on the sentence under this paragraph may be taken

only after consideration of any matters submitted by the accused

under subsection (b) or after the time for submitting such matters

expires, whichever is earlier.

‘‘(C) In taking action under this paragraph, the convening

authority may, in his sole discretion, approve, disapprove, commute,

or suspend the sentence in whole or in part. The convening

authority may not increase a sentence beyond that which is found

by the military commission.

‘‘(3) The convening authority is not required to take action

on the findings of a military commission under this chapter. If

the convening authority takes action on the findings, the convening

authority may, in his sole discretion, may—

‘‘(A) dismiss any charge or specification by setting aside

a finding of guilty thereto; or

‘‘(B) change a finding of guilty to a charge to a finding

of guilty to an offense that is a lesser included offense of

the offense stated in the charge.

‘‘(4) The convening authority shall serve on the accused or

on defense counsel notice of any action taken by the convening

authority under this subsection.

‘‘(d) ORDER OF REVISION OR REHEARING.—(1) Subject to paragraphs (2) and (3), the convening authority of a military commission

under this chapter may, in his sole discretion, order a proceeding

in revision or a rehearing.

‘‘(2)(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), a proceeding

in revision may be ordered by the convening authority if—

‘‘(i) there is an apparent error or omission in the record;

or

‘‘(ii) the record shows improper or inconsistent action by

the military commission with respect to the findings or sentence

that can be rectified without material prejudice to the substantial rights of the accused.

‘‘(B) In no case may a proceeding in revision—

‘‘(i) reconsider a finding of not guilty of a specification

or a ruling which amounts to a finding of not guilty;

‘‘(ii) reconsider a finding of not guilty of any charge, unless

there has been a finding of guilty under a specification laid

under that charge, which sufficiently alleges a violation; or

‘‘(iii) increase the severity of the sentence unless the sentence prescribed for the offense is mandatory.

‘‘(3) A rehearing may be ordered by the convening authority

if the convening authority disapproves the findings and sentence

and states the reasons for disapproval of the findings. If the convening authority disapproves the finding and sentence and does

not order a rehearing, the convening authority shall dismiss the

charges. A rehearing as to the findings may not be ordered by

Regulations.

120 STAT. 2620 PUBLIC LAW 109–366—OCT. 17, 2006

the convening authority when there is a lack of sufficient evidence

in the record to support the findings. A rehearing as to the sentence

may be ordered by the convening authority if the convening

authority disapproves the sentence.

‘‘§ 950c. Appellate referral; waiver or withdrawal of appeal

‘‘(a) AUTOMATIC REFERRAL FOR APPELLATE REVIEW.—Except as

provided under subsection (b), in each case in which the final

decision of a military commission (as approved by the convening

authority) includes a finding of guilty, the convening authority

shall refer the case to the Court of Military Commission Review.

Any such referral shall be made in accordance with procedures

prescribed under regulations of the Secretary.

‘‘(b) WAIVER OF RIGHT OF REVIEW.—(1) In each case subject

to appellate review under section 950f of this title, except a case

in which the sentence as approved under section 950b of this

title extends to death, the accused may file with the convening

authority a statement expressly waiving the right of the accused

to such review.

‘‘(2) A waiver under paragraph (1) shall be signed by both

the accused and a defense counsel.

‘‘(3) A waiver under paragraph (1) must be filed, if at all,

within 10 days after notice on the action is served on the accused

or on defense counsel under section 950b(c)(4) of this title. The

convening authority, for good cause, may extend the period for

such filing by not more than 30 days.

‘‘(c) WITHDRAWAL OF APPEAL.—Except in a case in which the

sentence as approved under section 950b of this title extends to

death, the accused may withdraw an appeal at any time.

‘‘(d) EFFECT OF WAIVER OR WITHDRAWAL.—A waiver of the

right to appellate review or the withdrawal of an appeal under

this section bars review under section 950f of this title.

‘‘§ 950d. Appeal by the United States

‘‘(a) INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL.—(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), in a trial by military commission under this chapter,

the United States may take an interlocutory appeal to the Court

of Military Commission Review of any order or ruling of the military

judge that—

‘‘(A) terminates proceedings of the military commission

with respect to a charge or specification;

‘‘(B) excludes evidence that is substantial proof of a fact

material in the proceeding; or

‘‘(C) relates to a matter under subsection (d), (e), or (f)

of section 949d of this title or section 949j(c) of this title.

‘‘(2) The United States may not appeal under paragraph (1)

an order or ruling that is, or amounts to, a finding of not guilty

by the military commission with respect to a charge or specification.

‘‘(b) NOTICE OF APPEAL.—The United States shall take an

appeal of an order or ruling under subsection (a) by filing a notice

of appeal with the military judge within five days after the date

of such order or ruling.

‘‘(c) APPEAL.—An appeal under this section shall be forwarded,

by means specified in regulations prescribed the Secretary of

Defense, directly to the Court of Military Commission Review. In

ruling on an appeal under this section, the Court may act only

with respect to matters of law.

Deadline.

Regulations.

PUBLIC LAW 109–366—OCT. 17, 2006 120 STAT. 2621

‘‘(d) APPEAL FROM ADVERSE RULING.—The United States may

appeal an adverse ruling on an appeal under subsection (c) to

the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia

Circuit by filing a petition for review in the Court of Appeals

within 10 days after the date of such ruling. Review under this

subsection shall be at the discretion of the Court of Appeals.

‘‘§ 950e. Rehearings

‘‘(a) COMPOSITION OF MILITARY COMMISSION FOR REHEARING.—

Each rehearing under this chapter shall take place before a military

commission under this chapter composed of members who were

not members of the military commission which first heard the

case.

‘‘(b) SCOPE OF REHEARING.—(1) Upon a rehearing—

‘‘(A) the accused may not be tried for any offense of which

he was found not guilty by the first military commission; and

‘‘(B) no sentence in excess of or more than the original

sentence may be imposed unless—

‘‘(i) the sentence is based upon a finding of guilty

of an offense not considered upon the merits in the original

proceedings; or

‘‘(ii) the sentence prescribed for the offense is mandatory.

‘‘(2) Upon a rehearing, if the sentence approved after the first

military commission was in accordance with a pretrial agreement

and the accused at the rehearing changes his plea with respect

to the charges or specifications upon which the pretrial agreement

was based, or otherwise does not comply with pretrial agreement,

the sentence as to those charges or specifications may include

any punishment not in excess of that lawfully adjudged at the

first military commission.

‘‘§ 950f. Review by Court of Military Commission Review

‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish

a Court of Military Commission Review which shall be composed

of one or more panels, and each such panel shall be composed

of not less than three appellate military judges. For the purpose

of reviewing military commission decisions under this chapter, the

court may sit in panels or as a whole in accordance with rules

prescribed by the Secretary.

‘‘(b) APPELLATE MILITARY JUDGES.—The Secretary shall assign

appellate military judges to a Court of Military Commission Review.

Each appellate military judge shall meet the qualifications for military judges prescribed by section 948j(b) of this title or shall be

a civilian with comparable qualifications. No person may be serve

as an appellate military judge in any case in which that person

acted as a military judge, counsel, or reviewing official.

‘‘(c) CASES TO BE REVIEWED.—The Court of Military Commission Review, in accordance with procedures prescribed under regulations of the Secretary, shall review the record in each case that

is referred to the Court by the convening authority under section

950c of this title with respect to any matter of law raised by

the accused.

‘‘(d) SCOPE OF REVIEW.—In a case reviewed by the Court of

Military Commission Review under this section, the Court may

act only with respect to matters of law.

Regulations.

Deadline.

120 STAT. 2622 PUBLIC LAW 109–366—OCT. 17, 2006

‘‘§ 950g. Review by the United States Court of Appeals for

the District of Columbia Circuit and the Supreme

Court

‘‘(a) EXCLUSIVE APPELLATE JURISDICTION.—(1)(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the United States Court of Appeals

for the District of Columbia Circuit shall have exclusive jurisdiction

to determine the validity of a final judgment rendered by a military

commission (as approved by the convening authority) under this

chapter.

‘‘(B) The Court of Appeals may not review the final judgment

until all other appeals under this chapter have been waived or

exhausted.

‘‘(2) A petition for review must be filed by the accused in

the Court of Appeals not later than 20 days after the date on

which—

‘‘(A) written notice of the final decision of the Court of

Military Commission Review is served on the accused or on

defense counsel; or

‘‘(B) the accused submits, in the form prescribed by section

950c of this title, a written notice waiving the right of the

accused to review by the Court of Military Commission Review

under section 950f of this title.

‘‘(b) STANDARD FOR REVIEW.—In a case reviewed by it under

this section, the Court of Appeals may act only with respect to

matters of law.

‘‘(c) SCOPE OF REVIEW.—The jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals

on an appeal under subsection (a) shall be limited to the consideration of—

‘‘(1) whether the final decision was consistent with the

standards and procedures specified in this chapter; and

‘‘(2) to the extent applicable, the Constitution and the laws

of the United States.

‘‘(d) SUPREME COURT.—The Supreme Court may review by writ

of certiorari the final judgment of the Court of Appeals pursuant

to section 1257 of title 28.

‘‘§ 950h. Appellate counsel

‘‘(a) APPOINTMENT.—The Secretary of Defense shall, by regulation, establish procedures for the appointment of appellate counsel

for the United States and for the accused in military commissions

under this chapter. Appellate counsel shall meet the qualifications

for counsel appearing before military commissions under this

chapter.

‘‘(b) REPRESENTATION OF UNITED STATES.—Appellate counsel

appointed under subsection (a)—

‘‘(1) shall represent the United States in any appeal or

review proceeding under this chapter before the Court of Military Commission Review; and

‘‘(2) may, when requested to do so by the Attorney General

in a case arising under this chapter, represent the United

States before the United States Court of Appeals for the District

of Columbia Circuit or the Supreme Court.

‘‘(c) REPRESENTATION OF ACCUSED.—The accused shall be represented by appellate counsel appointed under subsection (a) before

the Court of Military Commission Review, the United States Court

of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, and the Supreme

Court, and by civilian counsel if retained by the accused. Any

Regulations.

Deadline.

Notice.

PUBLIC LAW 109–366—OCT. 17, 2006 120 STAT. 2623

such civilian counsel shall meet the qualifications under paragraph

(3) of section 949c(b) of this title for civilian counsel appearing

before military commissions under this chapter and shall be subject

to the requirements of paragraph (4) of that section.

‘‘§ 950i. Execution of sentence; procedures for execution of

sentence of death

‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense is authorized to

carry out a sentence imposed by a military commission under this

chapter in accordance with such procedures as the Secretary may

prescribe.

‘‘(b) EXECUTION OF SENTENCE OF DEATH ONLY UPON APPROVAL

BY THE PRESIDENT.—If the sentence of a military commission under

this chapter extends to death, that part of the sentence providing

for death may not be executed until approved by the President.

In such a case, the President may commute, remit, or suspend

the sentence, or any part thereof, as he sees fit.

‘‘(c) EXECUTION OF SENTENCE OF DEATH ONLY UPON FINAL

JUDGMENT OF LEGALITY OF PROCEEDINGS.—(1) If the sentence of

a military commission under this chapter extends to death, the

sentence may not be executed until there is a final judgment as

to the legality of the proceedings (and with respect to death,

approval under subsection (b)).

‘‘(2) A judgment as to legality of proceedings is final for purposes

of paragraph (1) when—

‘‘(A) the time for the accused to file a petition for review

by the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

has expired and the accused has not filed a timely petition

for such review and the case is not otherwise under review

by that Court; or

‘‘(B) review is completed in accordance with the judgment

of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of

Columbia Circuit and—

‘‘(i) a petition for a writ of certiorari is not timely

filed;

‘‘(ii) such a petition is denied by the Supreme Court;

or

‘‘(iii) review is otherwise completed in accordance with

the judgment of the Supreme Court.

‘‘(d) SUSPENSION OF SENTENCE.—The Secretary of the Defense,

or the convening authority acting on the case (if other than the

Secretary), may suspend the execution of any sentence or part

thereof in the case, except a sentence of death.

‘‘§ 950j. Finality or proceedings, findings, and sentences

‘‘(a) FINALITY.—The appellate review of records of trial provided

by this chapter, and the proceedings, findings, and sentences of

military commissions as approved, reviewed, or affirmed as required

by this chapter, are final and conclusive. Orders publishing the

proceedings of military commissions under this chapter are binding

upon all departments, courts, agencies, and officers of the United

States, except as otherwise provided by the President.

‘‘(b) PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER SOLE BASIS FOR REVIEW OF MILITARY COMMISSION PROCEDURES AND ACTIONS.—Except as otherwise

provided in this chapter and notwithstanding any other provision

of law (including section 2241 of title 28 or any other habeas

corpus provision), no court, justice, or judge shall have jurisdiction

120 STAT. 2624 PUBLIC LAW 109–366—OCT. 17, 2006

to hear or consider any claim or cause of action whatsoever,

including any action pending on or filed after the date of the

enactment of the Military Commissions Act of 2006, relating to

the prosecution, trial, or judgment of a military commission under

this chapter, including challenges to the lawfulness of procedures

of military commissions under this chapter.

‘‘SUBCHAPTER VII—PUNITIVE MATTERS

‘‘Sec.

‘‘950p. Statement of substantive offenses.

‘‘950q. Principals.

‘‘950r. Accessory after the fact.

‘‘950s. Conviction of lesser included offense.

‘‘950t. Attempts.

‘‘950u. Solicitation.

‘‘950v. Crimes triable by military commissions.

‘‘950w. Perjury and obstruction of justice; contempt.

‘‘§ 950p. Statement of substantive offenses

‘‘(a) PURPOSE.—The provisions of this subchapter codify offenses

that have traditionally been triable by military commissions. This

chapter does not establish new crimes that did not exist before

its enactment, but rather codifies those crimes for trial by military

commission.

‘‘(b) EFFECT.—Because the provisions of this subchapter

(including provisions that incorporate definitions in other provisions

of law) are declarative of existing law, they do not preclude trial

for crimes that occurred before the date of the enactment of this

chapter.

‘‘§ 950q. Principals

‘‘Any person is punishable as a principal under this chapter

who—

‘‘(1) commits an offense punishable by this chapter, or

aids, abets, counsels, commands, or procures its commission;

‘‘(2) causes an act to be done which if directly performed

by him would be punishable by this chapter; or

‘‘(3) is a superior commander who, with regard to acts

punishable under this chapter, knew, had reason to know,

or should have known, that a subordinate was about to commit

such acts or had done so and who failed to take the necessary

and reasonable measures to prevent such acts or to punish

the perpetrators thereof.

‘‘§ 950r. Accessory after the fact

‘‘Any person subject to this chapter who, knowing that an

offense punishable by this chapter has been committed, receives,

comforts, or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent

his apprehension, trial, or punishment shall be punished as a

military commission under this chapter may direct.

‘‘§ 950s. Conviction of lesser included offense

‘‘An accused may be found guilty of an offense necessarily

included in the offense charged or of an attempt to commit either

the offense charged or an attempt to commit either the offense

charged or an offense necessarily included therein.

PUBLIC LAW 109–366—OCT. 17, 2006 120 STAT. 2625

‘‘§ 950t. Attempts

‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Any person subject to this chapter who

attempts to commit any offense punishable by this chapter shall

be punished as a military commission under this chapter may

direct.

‘‘(b) SCOPE OF OFFENSE.—An act, done with specific intent

to commit an offense under this chapter, amounting to more than

mere preparation and tending, even though failing, to effect its

commission, is an attempt to commit that offense.

‘‘(c) EFFECT OF CONSUMMATION.—Any person subject to this

chapter may be convicted of an attempt to commit an offense

although it appears on the trial that the offense was consummated.

‘‘§ 950u. Solicitation

‘‘Any person subject to this chapter who solicits or advises

another or others to commit one or more substantive offenses triable

by military commission under this chapter shall, if the offense

solicited or advised is attempted or committed, be punished with

the punishment provided for the commission of the offense, but,

if the offense solicited or advised is not committed or attempted,

he shall be punished as a military commission under this chapter

may direct.

‘‘§ 950v. Crimes triable by military commissions

‘‘(a) DEFINITIONS AND CONSTRUCTION.—In this section:

‘‘(1) MILITARY OBJECTIVE.—The term ‘military objective’

means—

‘‘(A) combatants; and

‘‘(B) those objects during an armed conflict—

‘‘(i) which, by their nature, location, purpose, or

use, effectively contribute to the opposing force’s warfighting or war-sustaining capability; and

‘‘(ii) the total or partial destruction, capture, or

neutralization of which would constitute a definite military advantage to the attacker under the circumstances

at the time of the attack.

‘‘(2) PROTECTED PERSON.—The term ‘protected person’

means any person entitled to protection under one or more

of the Geneva Conventions, including—

‘‘(A) civilians not taking an active part in hostilities;

‘‘(B) military personnel placed hors de combat by sickness, wounds, or detention; and

‘‘(C) military medical or religious personnel.

‘‘(3) PROTECTED PROPERTY.—The term ‘protected property’

means property specifically protected by the law of war (such

as buildings dedicated to religion, education, art, science or

charitable purposes, historic monuments, hospitals, or places

where the sick and wounded are collected), if such property

is not being used for military purposes or is not otherwise

a military objective. Such term includes objects properly identified by one of the distinctive emblems of the Geneva Conventions, but does not include civilian property that is a military

objective.

‘‘(4) CONSTRUCTION.—The intent specified for an offense

under paragraph (1), (2), (3), (4), or (12) of subsection (b)

precludes the applicability of such offense with regard to—

‘‘(A) collateral damage; or

120 STAT. 2626 PUBLIC LAW 109–366—OCT. 17, 2006

‘‘(B) death, damage, or injury incident to a lawful

attack.

‘‘(b) OFFENSES.—The following offenses shall be triable by military commission under this chapter at any time without limitation:

‘‘(1) MURDER OF PROTECTED PERSONS.—Any person subject

to this chapter who intentionally kills one or more protected

persons shall be punished by death or such other punishment

as a military commission under this chapter may direct.

‘‘(2) ATTACKING CIVILIANS.—Any person subject to this

chapter who intentionally engages in an attack upon a civilian

population as such, or individual civilians not taking active

part in hostilities, shall be punished, if death results to one

or more of the victims, by death or such other punishment

as a military commission under this chapter may direct, and,

if death does not result to any of the victims, by such punishment, other than death, as a military commission under this

chapter may direct.

‘‘(3) ATTACKING CIVILIAN OBJECTS.—Any person subject to

this chapter who intentionally engages in an attack upon a

civilian object that is not a military objective shall be punished

as a military commission under this chapter may direct.

‘‘(4) ATTACKING PROTECTED PROPERTY.—Any person subject

to this chapter who intentionally engages in an attack upon

protected property shall be punished as a military commission

under this chapter may direct.

‘‘(5) PILLAGING.—Any person subject to this chapter who

intentionally and in the absence of military necessity appropriates or seizes property for private or personal use, without

the consent of a person with authority to permit such appropriation or seizure, shall be punished as a military commission

under this chapter may direct.

‘‘(6) DENYING QUARTER.—Any person subject to this chapter

who, with effective command or control over subordinate

groups, declares, orders, or otherwise indicates to those groups

that there shall be no survivors or surrender accepted, with

the intent to threaten an adversary or to conduct hostilities

such that there would be no survivors or surrender accepted,

shall be punished as a military commission under this chapter

may direct.

‘‘(7) TAKING HOSTAGES.—Any person subject to this chapter

who, having knowingly seized or detained one or more persons,

threatens to kill, injure, or continue to detain such person

or persons with the intent of compelling any nation, person

other than the hostage, or group of persons to act or refrain

from acting as an explicit or implicit condition for the safety

or release of such person or persons, shall be punished, if

death results to one or more of the victims, by death or such

other punishment as a military commission under this chapter

may direct, and, if death does not result to any of the victims,

by such punishment, other than death, as a military commission

under this chapter may direct.

‘‘(8) EMPLOYING POISON OR SIMILAR WEAPONS.—Any person

subject to this chapter who intentionally, as a method of warfare, employs a substance or weapon that releases a substance

that causes death or serious and lasting damage to health

in the ordinary course of events, through its asphyxiating,

bacteriological, or toxic properties, shall be punished, if death

PUBLIC LAW 109–366—OCT. 17, 2006 120 STAT. 2627

results to one or more of the victims, by death or such other

punishment as a military commission under this chapter may

direct, and, if death does not result to any of the victims,

by such punishment, other than death, as a military commission

under this chapter may direct.

‘‘(9) USING PROTECTED PERSONS AS A SHIELD.—Any person

subject to this chapter who positions, or otherwise takes advantage of, a protected person with the intent to shield a military

objective from attack, or to shield, favor, or impede military

operations, shall be punished, if death results to one or more

of the victims, by death or such other punishment as a military

commission under this chapter may direct, and, if death does

not result to any of the victims, by such punishment, other

than death, as a military commission under this chapter may

direct.

‘‘(10) USING PROTECTED PROPERTY AS A SHIELD.—Any person subject to this chapter who positions, or otherwise takes

advantage of the location of, protected property with the intent

to shield a military objective from attack, or to shield, favor,

or impede military operations, shall be punished as a military

commission under this chapter may direct.

‘‘(11) TORTURE.—

‘‘(A) OFFENSE.—Any person subject to this chapter who

commits an act specifically intended to inflict severe physical or mental pain or suffering (other than pain or suffering incidental to lawful sanctions) upon another person

within his custody or physical control for the purpose of

obtaining information or a confession, punishment, intimidation, coercion, or any reason based on discrimination

of any kind, shall be punished, if death results to one

or more of the victims, by death or such other punishment

as a military commission under this chapter may direct,

and, if death does not result to any of the victims, by

such punishment, other than death, as a military commission under this chapter may direct.

‘‘(B) SEVERE MENTAL PAIN OR SUFFERING DEFINED.—

In this section, the term ‘severe mental pain or suffering’

has the meaning given that term in section 2340(2) of

title 18.

‘‘(12) CRUEL OR INHUMAN TREATMENT.—

‘‘(A) OFFENSE.—Any person subject to this chapter who

commits an act intended to inflict severe or serious physical

or mental pain or suffering (other than pain or suffering

incidental to lawful sanctions), including serious physical

abuse, upon another within his custody or control shall

be punished, if death results to the victim, by death or

such other punishment as a military commission under

this chapter may direct, and, if death does not result to

the victim, by such punishment, other than death, as a

military commission under this chapter may direct.

‘‘(B) DEFINITIONS.—In this paragraph:

‘‘(i) The term ‘serious physical pain or suffering’

means bodily injury that involves—

‘‘(I) a substantial risk of death;

‘‘(II) extreme physical pain;

120 STAT. 2628 PUBLIC LAW 109–366—OCT. 17, 2006

‘‘(III) a burn or physical disfigurement of a

serious nature (other than cuts, abrasions, or

bruises); or

‘‘(IV) significant loss or impairment of the

function of a bodily member, organ, or mental

faculty.

‘‘(ii) The term ‘severe mental pain or suffering’

has the meaning given that term in section 2340(2)

of title 18.

‘‘(iii) The term ‘serious mental pain or suffering’

has the meaning given the term ‘severe mental pain

or suffering’ in section 2340(2) of title 18, except that—

‘‘(I) the term ‘serious’ shall replace the term

‘severe’ where it appears; and

‘‘(II) as to conduct occurring after the date

of the enactment of the Military Commissions Act

of 2006, the term ‘serious and non-transitory

mental harm (which need not be prolonged)’ shall

replace the term ‘prolonged mental harm’ where

it appears.

‘‘(13) INTENTIONALLY CAUSING SERIOUS BODILY INJURY.—

‘‘(A) OFFENSE.—Any person subject to this chapter who

intentionally causes serious bodily injury to one or more

persons, including lawful combatants, in violation of the

law of war shall be punished, if death results to one or

more of the victims, by death or such other punishment

as a military commission under this chapter may direct,

and, if death does not result to any of the victims, by

such punishment, other than death, as a military commission under this chapter may direct.

‘‘(B) SERIOUS BODILY INJURY DEFINED.—In this paragraph, the term ‘serious bodily injury’ means bodily injury

which involves—

‘‘(i) a substantial risk of death;

‘‘(ii) extreme physical pain;

‘‘(iii) protracted and obvious disfigurement; or

‘‘(iv) protracted loss or impairment of the function

of a bodily member, organ, or mental faculty.

‘‘(14) MUTILATING OR MAIMING.—Any person subject to this

chapter who intentionally injures one or more protected persons

by disfiguring the person or persons by any mutilation of the

person or persons, or by permanently disabling any member,

limb, or organ of the body of the person or persons, without

any legitimate medical or dental purpose, shall be punished,

if death results to one or more of the victims, by death or

such other punishment as a military commission under this

chapter may direct, and, if death does not result to any of

the victims, by such punishment, other than death, as a military

commission under this chapter may direct.

‘‘(15) MURDER IN VIOLATION OF THE LAW OF WAR.—Any

person subject to this chapter who intentionally kills one or

more persons, including lawful combatants, in violation of the

law of war shall be punished by death or such other punishment

as a military commission under this chapter may direct.

‘‘(16) DESTRUCTION OF PROPERTY IN VIOLATION OF THE LAW

OF WAR.—Any person subject to this chapter who intentionally

destroys property belonging to another person in violation of

PUBLIC LAW 109–366—OCT. 17, 2006 120 STAT. 2629

the law of war shall punished as a military commission under

this chapter may direct.

‘‘(17) USING TREACHERY OR PERFIDY.—Any person subject

to this chapter who, after inviting the confidence or belief

of one or more persons that they were entitled to, or obliged

to accord, protection under the law of war, intentionally makes

use of that confidence or belief in killing, injuring, or capturing

such person or persons shall be punished, if death results

to one or more of the victims, by death or such other punishment as a military commission under this chapter may direct,

and, if death does not result to any of the victims, by such

punishment, other than death, as a military commission under

this chapter may direct.

‘‘(18) IMPROPERLY USING A FLAG OF TRUCE.—Any person

subject to this chapter who uses a flag of truce to feign an

intention to negotiate, surrender, or otherwise suspend hostilities when there is no such intention shall be punished as

a military commission under this chapter may direct.

‘‘(19) IMPROPERLY USING A DISTINCTIVE EMBLEM.—Any person subject to this chapter who intentionally uses a distinctive

emblem recognized by the law of war for combatant purposes

in a manner prohibited by the law of war shall be punished

as a military commission under this chapter may direct.

‘‘(20) INTENTIONALLY MISTREATING A DEAD BODY.—Any person subject to this chapter who intentionally mistreats the

body of a dead person, without justification by legitimate military necessity, shall be punished as a military commission

under this chapter may direct.

‘‘(21) RAPE.—Any person subject to this chapter who forcibly or with coercion or threat of force wrongfully invades

the body of a person by penetrating, however slightly, the

anal or genital opening of the victim with any part of the

body of the accused, or with any foreign object, shall be punished as a military commission under this chapter may direct.

‘‘(22) SEXUAL ASSAULT OR ABUSE.—Any person subject to

this chapter who forcibly or with coercion or threat of force

engages in sexual contact with one or more persons, or causes

one or more persons to engage in sexual contact, shall be

punished as a military commission under this chapter may

direct.

‘‘(23) HIJACKING OR HAZARDING A VESSEL OR AIRCRAFT.—

Any person subject to this chapter who intentionally seizes,

exercises unauthorized control over, or endangers the safe

navigation of a vessel or aircraft that is not a legitimate military

objective shall be punished, if death results to one or more

of the victims, by death or such other punishment as a military

commission under this chapter may direct, and, if death does

not result to any of the victims, by such punishment, other

than death, as a military commission under this chapter may

direct.

‘‘(24) TERRORISM.—Any person subject to this chapter who

intentionally kills or inflicts great bodily harm on one or more

protected persons, or intentionally engages in an act that

evinces a wanton disregard for human life, in a manner calculated to influence or affect the conduct of government or

civilian population by intimidation or coercion, or to retaliate

against government conduct, shall be punished, if death results

120 STAT. 2630 PUBLIC LAW 109–366—OCT. 17, 2006

to one or more of the victims, by death or such other punishment as a military commission under this chapter may direct,

and, if death does not result to any of the victims, by such

punishment, other than death, as a military commission under

this chapter may direct.

‘‘(25) PROVIDING MATERIAL SUPPORT FOR TERRORISM.— ‘‘(A) OFFENSE.—Any person subject to this chapter who

provides material support or resources, knowing or

intending that they are to be used in preparation for,

or in carrying out, an act of terrorism (as set forth in

paragraph (24)), or who intentionally provides material

support or resources to an international terrorist organization engaged in hostilities against the United States,

knowing that such organization has engaged or engages

in terrorism (as so set forth), shall be punished as a military

commission under this chapter may direct.

‘‘(B) MATERIAL SUPPORT OR RESOURCES DEFINED.—In

this paragraph, the term ‘material support or resources’

has the meaning given that term in section 2339A(b) of

title 18.

‘‘(26) WRONGFULLY AIDING THE ENEMY.—Any person subject

to this chapter who, in breach of an allegiance or duty to

the United States, knowingly and intentionally aids an enemy

of the United States, or one of the co-belligerents of the enemy,

shall be punished as a military commission under this chapter

may direct.

‘‘(27) SPYING.—Any person subject to this chapter who with

intent or reason to believe that it is to be used to the injury

of the United States or to the advantage of a foreign power,

collects or attempts to collect information by clandestine means

or while acting under false pretenses, for the purpose of conveying such information to an enemy of the United States,

or one of the co-belligerents of the enemy, shall be punished

by death or such other punishment as a military commission

under this chapter may direct.

‘‘(28) CONSPIRACY.—Any person subject to this chapter who

conspires to commit one or more substantive offenses triable

by military commission under this chapter, and who knowingly

does any overt act to effect the object of the conspiracy, shall

be punished, if death results to one or more of the victims,

by death or such other punishment as a military commission

under this chapter may direct, and, if death does not result

to any of the victims, by such punishment, other than death,

as a military commission under this chapter may direct.

‘‘§ 950w. Perjury and obstruction of justice; contempt

‘‘(a) PERJURY AND OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.—A military

commission under this chapter may try offenses and impose such

punishment as the military commission may direct for perjury,

false testimony, or obstruction of justice related to military commissions under this chapter.

‘‘(b) CONTEMPT.—A military commission under this chapter may

punish for contempt any person who uses any menacing word,

sign, or gesture in its presence, or who disturbs its proceedings

by any riot or disorder.’’.

(2) TABLES OF CHAPTERS AMENDMENTS.—The tables of chapters at the beginning of subtitle A, and at the beginning of

PUBLIC LAW 109–366—OCT. 17, 2006 120 STAT. 2631

part II of subtitle A, of title 10, United States Code, are each

amended by inserting after the item relating to chapter 47

the following new item:

‘‘47A. Military Commissions .................................................................................. 948a’’.

(b) SUBMITTAL OF PROCEDURES TO CONGRESS.—Not later than

90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary

of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services

of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report setting

forth the procedures for military commissions prescribed under

chapter 47A of title 10, United States Code (as added by subsection

(a)).

SEC. 4. AMENDMENTS TO UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE.

(a) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Chapter 47 of title 10, United

States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended

as follows:

(1) APPLICABILITY TO LAWFUL ENEMY COMBATANTS.—Section

802(a) (article 2(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

‘‘(13) Lawful enemy combatants (as that term is defined

in section 948a(2) of this title) who violate the law of war.’’.

(2) EXCLUSION OF APPLICABILITY TO CHAPTER 47A COMMIS- SIONS.—Sections 821, 828, 848, 850(a), 904, and 906 (articles

21, 28, 48, 50(a), 104, and 106) are amended by adding at

the end the following new sentence: ‘‘This section does not

apply to a military commission established under chapter 47A

of this title.’’.

(3) INAPPLICABILITY OF REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO REGULATIONS.—Section 836 (article 36) is amended—

(A) in subsection (a), by inserting ‘‘, except as provided

in chapter 47A of this title,’’ after ‘‘but which may not’’;

and

(B) in subsection (b), by inserting before the period

at the end ‘‘, except insofar as applicable to military

commissions established under chapter 47A of this title’’.

(b) PUNITIVE ARTICLE OF CONSPIRACY.—Section 881 of title

10, United States Code (article 81 of the Uniform Code of Military

Justice), is amended—

(1) by inserting ‘‘(a)’’ before ‘‘Any person’’; and

(2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:

‘‘(b) Any person subject to this chapter who conspires with

any other person to commit an offense under the law of war,

and who knowingly does an overt act to effect the object of the

conspiracy, shall be punished, if death results to one or more

of the victims, by death or such other punishment as a courtmartial or military commission may direct, and, if death does not

result to any of the victims, by such punishment, other than death,

as a court-martial or military commission may direct.’’.

SEC. 5. TREATY OBLIGATIONS NOT ESTABLISHING GROUNDS FOR CERTAIN CLAIMS.

(a) IN GENERAL.—No person may invoke the Geneva Conventions or any protocols thereto in any habeas corpus or other civil

action or proceeding to which the United States, or a current

or former officer, employee, member of the Armed Forces, or other

agent of the United States is a party as a source of rights in

any court of the United States or its States or territories.

28 USC 2241

note.

Deadline.

Reports.

10 USC 948a

note.

120 STAT. 2632 PUBLIC LAW 109–366—OCT. 17, 2006

(b) GENEVA CONVENTIONS DEFINED.—In this section, the term

‘‘Geneva Conventions’’ means—

(1) the Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition

of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field, done

at Geneva August 12, 1949 (6 UST 3114);

(2) the Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition

of the Wounded, Sick, and Shipwrecked Members of the Armed

Forces at Sea, done at Geneva August 12, 1949 (6 UST 3217);

(3) the Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners

of War, done at Geneva August 12, 1949 (6 UST 3316); and

(4) the Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian

Persons in Time of War, done at Geneva August 12, 1949

(6 UST 3516).

SEC. 6. IMPLEMENTATION OF TREATY OBLIGATIONS.

(a) IMPLEMENTATION OF TREATY OBLIGATIONS.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—The acts enumerated in subsection (d)

of section 2441 of title 18, United States Code, as added by

subsection (b) of this section, and in subsection (c) of this

section, constitute violations of common Article 3 of the Geneva

Conventions prohibited by United States law.

(2) PROHIBITION ON GRAVE BREACHES.—The provisions of

section 2441 of title 18, United States Code, as amended by

this section, fully satisfy the obligation under Article 129 of

the Third Geneva Convention for the United States to provide

effective penal sanctions for grave breaches which are encompassed in common Article 3 in the context of an armed conflict

not of an international character. No foreign or international

source of law shall supply a basis for a rule of decision in

the courts of the United States in interpreting the prohibitions

enumerated in subsection (d) of such section 2441.

(3) INTERPRETATION BY THE PRESIDENT.—

(A) As provided by the Constitution and by this section,

the President has the authority for the United States to

interpret the meaning and application of the Geneva

Conventions and to promulgate higher standards and

administrative regulations for violations of treaty obligations which are not grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions.

(B) The President shall issue interpretations described

by subparagraph (A) by Executive Order published in the

Federal Register.

(C) Any Executive Order published under this paragraph shall be authoritative (except as to grave breaches

of common Article 3) as a matter of United States law,

in the same manner as other administrative regulations.

(D) Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect

the constitutional functions and responsibilities of Congress

and the judicial branch of the United States.

(4) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection:

(A) GENEVA CONVENTIONS.—The term ‘‘Geneva Conventions’’ means—

(i) the Convention for the Amelioration of the

Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces

in the Field, done at Geneva August 12, 1949 (6 UST

3217);

President.

Federal Register,

publication.

18 USC 2441

note.

PUBLIC LAW 109–366—OCT. 17, 2006 120 STAT. 2633

(ii) the Convention for the Amelioration of the

Condition of the Wounded, Sick, and Shipwrecked

Members of the Armed Forces at Sea, done at Geneva

August 12, 1949 (6 UST 3217);

(iii) the Convention Relative to the Treatment of

Prisoners of War, done at Geneva August 12, 1949

(6 UST 3316); and

(iv) the Convention Relative to the Protection of

Civilian Persons in Time of War, done at Geneva

August 12, 1949 (6 UST 3516).

(B) THIRD GENEVA CONVENTION.—The term ‘‘Third

Geneva Convention’’ means the international convention

referred to in subparagraph (A)(iii).

(b) REVISION TO WAR CRIMES OFFENSE UNDER FEDERAL

CRIMINAL CODE.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 2441 of title 18, United States

Code, is amended—

(A) in subsection (c), by striking paragraph (3) and

inserting the following new paragraph (3):

‘‘(3) which constitutes a grave breach of common Article

3 (as defined in subsection (d)) when committed in the context

of and in association with an armed conflict not of an international character; or’’; and

(B) by adding at the end the following new subsection:

‘‘(d) COMMON ARTICLE 3 VIOLATIONS.—

‘‘(1) PROHIBITED CONDUCT.—In subsection (c)(3), the term

‘grave breach of common Article 3’ means any conduct (such

conduct constituting a grave breach of common Article 3 of

the international conventions done at Geneva August 12, 1949),

as follows:

‘‘(A) TORTURE.—The act of a person who commits, or

conspires or attempts to commit, an act specifically

intended to inflict severe physical or mental pain or suffering (other than pain or suffering incidental to lawful

sanctions) upon another person within his custody or physical control for the purpose of obtaining information or

a confession, punishment, intimidation, coercion, or any

reason based on discrimination of any kind.

‘‘(B) CRUEL OR INHUMAN TREATMENT.—The act of a

person who commits, or conspires or attempts to commit,

an act intended to inflict severe or serious physical or

mental pain or suffering (other than pain or suffering incidental to lawful sanctions), including serious physical

abuse, upon another within his custody or control.

‘‘(C) PERFORMING BIOLOGICAL EXPERIMENTS.—The act

of a person who subjects, or conspires or attempts to subject, one or more persons within his custody or physical

control to biological experiments without a legitimate medical or dental purpose and in so doing endangers the body

or health of such person or persons.

‘‘(D) MURDER.—The act of a person who intentionally

kills, or conspires or attempts to kill, or kills whether

intentionally or unintentionally in the course of committing

any other offense under this subsection, one or more persons taking no active part in the hostilities, including those

placed out of combat by sickness, wounds, detention, or

any other cause.

120 STAT. 2634 PUBLIC LAW 109–366—OCT. 17, 2006

‘‘(E) MUTILATION OR MAIMING.—The act of a person

who intentionally injures, or conspires or attempts to

injure, or injures whether intentionally or unintentionally

in the course of committing any other offense under this

subsection, one or more persons taking no active part in

the hostilities, including those placed out of combat by

sickness, wounds, detention, or any other cause, by disfiguring the person or persons by any mutilation thereof

or by permanently disabling any member, limb, or organ

of his body, without any legitimate medical or dental purpose.

‘‘(F) INTENTIONALLY CAUSING SERIOUS BODILY INJURY.— The act of a person who intentionally causes, or conspires

or attempts to cause, serious bodily injury to one or more

persons, including lawful combatants, in violation of the

law of war.

‘‘(G) RAPE.—The act of a person who forcibly or with

coercion or threat of force wrongfully invades, or conspires

or attempts to invade, the body of a person by penetrating,

however slightly, the anal or genital opening of the victim

with any part of the body of the accused, or with any

foreign object.

‘‘(H) SEXUAL ASSAULT OR ABUSE.—The act of a person

who forcibly or with coercion or threat of force engages,

or conspires or attempts to engage, in sexual contact with

one or more persons, or causes, or conspires or attempts

to cause, one or more persons to engage in sexual contact.

‘‘(I) TAKING HOSTAGES.—The act of a person who,

having knowingly seized or detained one or more persons,

threatens to kill, injure, or continue to detain such person

or persons with the intent of compelling any nation, person

other than the hostage, or group of persons to act or refrain

from acting as an explicit or implicit condition for the

safety or release of such person or persons.

‘‘(2) DEFINITIONS.—In the case of an offense under subsection (a) by reason of subsection (c)(3)—

‘‘(A) the term ‘severe mental pain or suffering’ shall

be applied for purposes of paragraphs (1)(A) and (1)(B)

in accordance with the meaning given that term in section

2340(2) of this title;

‘‘(B) the term ‘serious bodily injury’ shall be applied

for purposes of paragraph (1)(F) in accordance with the

meaning given that term in section 113(b)(2) of this title;

‘‘(C) the term ‘sexual contact’ shall be applied for purposes of paragraph (1)(G) in accordance with the meaning

given that term in section 2246(3) of this title;

‘‘(D) the term ‘serious physical pain or suffering’ shall

be applied for purposes of paragraph (1)(B) as meaning

bodily injury that involves—

‘‘(i) a substantial risk of death;

‘‘(ii) extreme physical pain;

‘‘(iii) a burn or physical disfigurement of a serious

nature (other than cuts, abrasions, or bruises); or

‘‘(iv) significant loss or impairment of the function

of a bodily member, organ, or mental faculty; and

‘‘(E) the term ‘serious mental pain or suffering’ shall

be applied for purposes of paragraph (1)(B) in accordance

PUBLIC LAW 109–366—OCT. 17, 2006 120 STAT. 2635

with the meaning given the term ‘severe mental pain or

suffering’ (as defined in section 2340(2) of this title), except

that—

‘‘(i) the term ‘serious’ shall replace the term ‘severe’

where it appears; and

‘‘(ii) as to conduct occurring after the date of the

enactment of the Military Commissions Act of 2006,

the term ‘serious and non-transitory mental harm

(which need not be prolonged)’ shall replace the term

‘prolonged mental harm’ where it appears.

‘‘(3) INAPPLICABILITY OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS WITH RESPECT

TO COLLATERAL DAMAGE OR INCIDENT OF LAWFUL ATTACK.— The intent specified for the conduct stated in subparagraphs

(D), (E), and (F) or paragraph (1) precludes the applicability

of those subparagraphs to an offense under subsection (a) by

reasons of subsection (c)(3) with respect to—

‘‘(A) collateral damage; or

‘‘(B) death, damage, or injury incident to a lawful

attack.

‘‘(4) INAPPLICABILITY OF TAKING HOSTAGES TO PRISONER

EXCHANGE.—Paragraph (1)(I) does not apply to an offense under

subsection (a) by reason of subsection (c)(3) in the case of

a prisoner exchange during wartime.

‘‘(5) DEFINITION OF GRAVE BREACHES.—The definitions in

this subsection are intended only to define the grave breaches

of common Article 3 and not the full scope of United States

obligations under that Article.’’.

(2) RETROACTIVE APPLICABILITY.—The amendments made

by this subsection, except as specified in subsection (d)(2)(E)

of section 2441 of title 18, United States Code, shall take

effect as of November 26, 1997, as if enacted immediately

after the amendments made by section 583 of Public Law

105–118 (as amended by section 4002(e)(7) of Public Law 107–

273).

(c) ADDITIONAL PROHIBITION ON CRUEL, INHUMAN, OR

DEGRADING TREATMENT OR PUNISHMENT.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—No individual in the custody or under

the physical control of the United States Government, regardless of nationality or physical location, shall be subject to cruel,

inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment.

(2) CRUEL, INHUMAN, OR DEGRADING TREATMENT OR PUNISHMENT DEFINED.—In this subsection, the term ‘‘cruel, inhuman,

or degrading treatment or punishment’’ means cruel, unusual,

and inhumane treatment or punishment prohibited by the Fifth,

Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of

the United States, as defined in the United States Reservations,

Declarations and Understandings to the United Nations

Convention Against Torture and Other Forms of Cruel,

Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment done at New

York, December 10, 1984.

(3) COMPLIANCE.—The President shall take action to ensure

compliance with this subsection, including through the

establishment of administrative rules and procedures.

SEC. 7. HABEAS CORPUS MATTERS.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2241 of title 28, United States Code,

is amended by striking both the subsection (e) added by section

President.

Rules.

Procedures.

42 USC

2000dd–0.

120 STAT. 2636 PUBLIC LAW 109–366—OCT. 17, 2006

1005(e)(1) of Public Law 109–148 (119 Stat. 2742) and the subsection (e) added by added by section 1405(e)(1) of Public Law

109–163 (119 Stat. 3477) and inserting the following new subsection

(e):

‘‘(e)(1) No court, justice, or judge shall have jurisdiction to

hear or consider an application for a writ of habeas corpus filed

by or on behalf of an alien detained by the United States who

has been determined by the United States to have been properly

detained as an enemy combatant or is awaiting such determination.

‘‘(2) Except as provided in paragraphs (2) and (3) of section

1005(e) of the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 (10 U.S.C. 801

note), no court, justice, or judge shall have jurisdiction to hear

or consider any other action against the United States or its agents

relating to any aspect of the detention, transfer, treatment, trial,

or conditions of confinement of an alien who is or was detained

by the United States and has been determined by the United

States to have been properly detained as an enemy combatant

or is awaiting such determination.’’.

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by subsection (a)

shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and

shall apply to all cases, without exception, pending on or after

the date of the enactment of this Act which relate to any aspect

of the detention, transfer, treatment, trial, or conditions of detention

of an alien detained by the United States since September 11,

2001.

SEC. 8. REVISIONS TO DETAINEE TREATMENT ACT OF 2005 RELATING

TO PROTECTION OF CERTAIN UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PERSONNEL.

(a) COUNSEL AND INVESTIGATIONS.—Section 1004(b) of the

Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 2000dd–1(b)) is

amended—

(1) by striking ‘‘may provide’’ and inserting ‘‘shall provide’’;

(2) by inserting ‘‘or investigation’’ after ‘‘criminal prosecution’’; and

(3) by inserting ‘‘whether before United States courts or

agencies, foreign courts or agencies, or international courts

or agencies,’’ after ‘‘described in that subsection’’.

(b) PROTECTION OF PERSONNEL.—Section 1004 of the Detainee

Treatment Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 2000dd–1) shall apply with respect

to any criminal prosecution that—

(1) relates to the detention and interrogation of aliens

described in such section;

(2) is grounded in section 2441(c)(3) of title 18, United

States Code; and

(3) relates to actions occurring between September 11,

2001, and December 30, 2005.

SEC. 9. REVIEW OF JUDGMENTS OF MILITARY COMMISSIONS.

Section 1005(e)(3) of the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 (title

X of Public Law 109–148; 119 Stat. 2740; 10 U.S.C. 801 note)

is amended—

(1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘pursuant to Military

Commission Order No. 1. dated August 31, 2005 (or any successor military order)’’ and inserting ‘‘by a military commission

under chapter 47A of title 10, United States Code’’;

(2) by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the following

new subparagraph (B):

Applicability.

42 USC

2000dd–1 note.

28 USC 2441

note.

PUBLIC LAW 109–366—OCT. 17, 2006 120 STAT. 2637

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 3930 (H.R. 6054):

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 109–664, Pt. 1 (Comm. on Armed Services) and Pt. 2

(Comm. on the Judiciary), both accompanying H.R. 6054.

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):

Sept. 27, 28, considered and passed Senate.

Sept. 29, considered and passed House.

WEEKLY COMPILATION OF PRESIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS, Vol. 42 (2006):

Oct. 17, Presidential remarks.

Æ

‘‘(B) GRANT OF REVIEW.—Review under this paragraph

shall be as of right.’’;

(3) in subparagraph (C)—

(A) in clause (i)—

(i) by striking ‘‘pursuant to the military order’’

and inserting ‘‘by a military commission’’; and

(ii) by striking ‘‘at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba’’; and

(B) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘pursuant to such military

order’’ and inserting ‘‘by the military commission’’; and

(4) in subparagraph (D)(i), by striking ‘‘specified in the

military order’’ and inserting ‘‘specified for a military commission’’.

SEC. 10. DETENTION COVERED BY REVIEW OF DECISIONS OF COMBATANT STATUS REVIEW TRIBUNALS OF PROPRIETY OF

DETENTION.

Section 1005(e)(2)(B)(i) of the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005

(title X of Public Law 109–148; 119 Stat. 2742; 10 U.S.C. 801

note) is amended by striking ‘‘the Department of Defense at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba’’ and inserting ‘‘the United States’’.

Approved October 17, 2006.