alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 236 (Thursday, December 9, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 76742]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30961]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Member Conflict: NIH Exploratory Developmental Research Grant 
Program In Urology.
    Date: December 22, 2010.
    Time: 11 a.m. to 1 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Mushtaq A. Khan, DVM, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 2176, MSC 7818, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-435-1778, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ff94979e9192bf9c8c8dd1919697d1989089"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="462d2e27282b0625353468282f2e68212930">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 3, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-30961 Filed 12-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 959.101 Terms.

The terms used in this subpart shall have the same meaning as when used in the order.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6217

RICK STEARNSMILLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus P. DOUGLAS TAYLOR; DORIS MIXON; JOHN DOE, 1- 20; WILLIE EAGLETON; GEORGIA YEARWOOD; MICHAEL W. MOORE; DOUG CATOE; FRANCES L. STROKER;SAMUEL LATTA; GEORGE BEST, Captain; EICHENBURGER, Captain; BOARD OF CORRECTIONS; CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICE; REX M. DEVINE; MICHAEL LOCKE; JAMES FELDER; R. NAJJAR, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Falcon B. Hawkins, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-2195-3-11-BC) Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: October 6, 1999 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rick Stearnsmiller, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Rick Stearnsmiller noted an appeal from the district court’s order denying his appeal of a non-dispositive order entered by the magistrate judge in his underlying civil action. We dismiss theappeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 35.1



|                       | Commercial Mortgage Servicing
|---------------------- | -----------------------------
|D1086-120, 12th Floor 
|550 South Tryon Street
|Charlotte, NC 28202   
|1-800-326-1334        







ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE



Reference is hereby
made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1,
2012, by and among GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master
Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer,  Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor and U.S. Bank
National Assocation as Certificate Administrator and Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
Series 2015-GCJ9 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings
assigned in the Agreement.



Pursuant to Section 10.08
of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master
                                                                                                                    Servicer during the period from  January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its
                                                                                                                    performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review,
the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting
Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------









IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.







|/s/Daniel Bober         
|------------------------
|Daniel Bober            
|Executive Vice President
|Wells Fargo Bank        









|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | 
|---------------------- |
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

V. ) CR. No.: 2:06cr209-WKW

)

BRIDGET Y. TAYLOR )

MOTION TO VACATE MOTION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING (Doc. No. 24)

COMES NOW the Defendant, Bridget Taylor, by and through undersigned counsel, Kevin

L. Butler, and submits the following:

1. On Wednesday, December 27, 2006, undersigned counsel filed an Unopposed Motion

to Continue Sentencing (Doc. No. 24). After speaking with the defendant regarding the necessity

and the basis for the continuance, undersigned counsel was informed by Ms. Taylor that she would

prefer to go forward with sentencing on January 22, 2007, even if all information is not available to

defense.

WHEREFORE for these reasons, undersigned counsel moves to vacate the pleading (Doc.

No. 24) however, undersigned counsel would still request ten (10) additional days to file objections

to the PSI Report.

Dated this 28 day of December 2006. th

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Kevin L. Butler

KEVIN L. BUTLER

First Assistant Federal Defender

201 Monroe Street, Suite 407

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Phone: (334) 834-2099

Fax: (334) 834-0353

E-mail: kevin_butler@fd.org

AZ Bar Code: 014138

Case 2:06-cr-00209-MHT-CSC Document 26 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 1 of 2
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

V. ) CR. No.: 2:06cr209-WKW

)

BRIDGET Y. TAYLOR )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on December 28, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk

of Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following: 

Verne Speirs, Esquire

Assistant United States Attorney

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Kevin L. Butler

KEVIN L. BUTLER

First Assistant Federal Defender

201 Monroe Street, Suite 407

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Phone: (334) 834-2099

Fax: (334) 834-0353

E-mail: kevin_butler@fd.org

AZ Bar Code: 014138

Case 2:06-cr-00209-MHT-CSC Document 26 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 2 of 2
#### DREW, Appellant, v. COLEMAN, Respondent, et al.

(No. 6675.)

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

December 31, 1914.)

Appeal from Special Term, New York County. Action by John A. Drew against Charles Philip Coleman, impleaded, etc. From an order granting motion to make complaint more definite and certain, plaintiff appeals. Modified and affirmed.

W. Bourke Cockran, of New York City, for appellant.

David Leventritt, of New York City, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The order appealed from should be modified as follows, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs: Subdivision 1: Stricken out. Subdivision 2: Amended, so as to read as follows: “Whether or not it is intended to be alleged that this defendant or the board of directors of which he was a member received any part of the amount referred to in paragraph twenty-fifth of the complaint as ‘various sums aggregating five and a half million dollars.’ ” Subdivision 3: Strike out the last 9 words thereof: “And, if a part, what amount was so received.” Subdivision 4: Strike out the last 26 words thereof: “And, if a part of said sum, what amount is alleged to have so disappeared, and, if so, of what said wrongful acts or negligence consisted.” Subdivision 5: Strike out the words: “And in what transaction or transactions.” Subdivision 6: Strike out the words: “And, if a part what part.”
Exhibit 10.25


AMENDMENT
TO THE 
PITTWAY CORPORATION SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT
PLAN


	
  

 	
  

 	
  

 	
  

 
	
  

 	
            Pursuant
 to the authority granted to proper officers of Honeywell International Inc.
 (the “Company”) by the Management Development and Compensation Committee of
 the Board of Directors on December 11, 2009, the Pittway Corporation
 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan shall be amended effective January 1,
 2010 to include as eligible pay for an eligible participant (defined below)
 the greater of (a) the incentive compensation received under the terms of the
 Honeywell International Inc. Incentive Compensation Plan for Executive
 Employees (“ICP”) in 2009 (earned in 2008), or (b) the incentive compensation
 received under the terms of the ICP in 2010 (earned for 2009); provided,
 however, that if incentive compensation is included under clause (a), the
 value of the incentive compensation received in 2009 (earned in 2008) shall
 be reduced by the actual incentive compensation received and credited to
 Honeywell’s qualified pension plans and/or non-qualified pension plans in
 2010 (earned for 2009) to avoid double counting. If incentive compensation is
 included under clause (a), such incentive compensation shall be treated under
 the applicable pension formula as eligible pay earned in 2009 and paid in
 2010.

 
	
  

 	
  

 
	
  

 	
            This
 amendment shall be subject to the following conditions:

 
	
  

 	
  

 
	
  

 	
  

 	
 (a)

 	
 an eligible
 participant is a participant who, on March 15, 2010, is earning a pension
 benefit under the Honeywell Retirement Earnings Plan and is employed by the
 Company in Band 5, 6 or 7, other than a participant who receives zero
 incentive compensation in 2010 (earned for 2009) and is coded in the
 Company’s records as having a performance planning reason for such (e.g.,
 “performance issue” (PI) or “performance termination” (PT)); and

 
	
  

 	
  

 	
 (b)

 	
 the amounts
 required to be included in eligible pay shall not be included more than one
 time.

 






	
  

 	
  

 	
  

 
	
  

 	
 HONEYWELL
 INTERNATIONAL INC.

 
	
  

 	
  

 
	
  

 	
 /s/ Mark James

 	
  

 
	
  

 	
 Mark James

 Senior Vice President – Human Resources and Communications

 



Dated: January 12, 2010
2829.303 Application of State and local taxes

to Government contractors and

subcontractors.

(a) It is DOJ policy that DOJ contracts shall not contain clauses expressly designating prime

contractors as agents of the Government for the purpose of avoiding State and local taxes.

(b) A DOJ contracting activity may request to the CAO, through the HCA, that a contractor be

considered an agent of the Government for the purpose of claiming immunity from State and local

sales and use taxes. The CAO will review such requests to ensure compliance with DOJ policy and

applicable law. Each case forwarded will be reviewed by the HCA or designee for approval before

referral to the CAO.

Parent topic: Subpart 2829.3 - State and Local Taxes
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 212 

Honoring military children during ‘‘National Month of the Military Child’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 13, 2005 

Mr. MORAN of Virginia (for himself, Mr. MEEHAN, Mr. ISSA, Mr. GRIJALVA, 

Mrs. DAVIS of California, Mr. LARSEN of Washington, Mr. RYAN of Ohio, 

Mr. SMITH of Washington, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr. REYES, Mr. 

MCINTYRE, Mr. JONES of North Carolina, Mrs. JONES of Ohio, Mr. 

ABERCROMBIE, Mr. SKELTON, Mr. SNYDER, Mr. SPRATT, Mr. SHIMKUS, 

Mrs. MCCARTHY, Mr. HAYES, Mrs. DRAKE, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. TAYLOR

of Mississippi, and Mr. NEUGEBAUER) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring military children during ‘‘National Month of the 

Military Child’’. 

Whereas more than a million Americans are demonstrating 

their courage and commitment to freedom by serving in 

the Armed Forces of the United States; 

Whereas nearly 40 percent of the members of the Armed 

Forces, when deployed away from their permanent duty 

stations, have left families with children behind; 

Whereas no one feels the effect of those deployments more 

than the children of deployed service members; 
2 

•HRES 212 IH 

Whereas as of March 31, 2005, approximately 1,000 of these 

children have lost a parent serving in the Armed Forces 

during the preceding five years; 

Whereas the daily struggles and personal sacrifices of children of members of the Armed Forces too often go unnoticed; 

Whereas the children of members of the Armed Forces are 

a source of pride and honor to all Americans and it is 

fitting that the Nation recognize their contributions and 

celebrate their spirit; 

Whereas the ‘‘National Month of the Military Child’’, observed in April each year, recognizes military children for 

their sacrifices and contributes to demonstrating the Nation’s unconditional support to members of the Armed 

Forces; 

Whereas in addition to Department of Defense programs to 

support military families and military children, a variety 

of programs and campaigns have been established in the 

private sector to honor, support, and thank military children by fostering awareness and appreciation for the sacrifices and the challenges they face; and 

Whereas a month-long salute to military children will encourage support for those organizations and campaigns established to provide direct support for military children and 

families: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) joins the Secretary of Defense in honoring 

3 the children of members of the Armed Forces and 

4 recognizes that they too share in the burden of pro5 tecting the Nation, 
3 

•HRES 212 IH 

1 (2) urges Americans to join with the military 

2 community in observing the ‘‘National Month of the 

3 Military Child’’ with appropriate ceremonies and ac4 tivities that honor, support, and thank military chil5 dren; and 

6 (3) recognizes with great appreciation the con7 tributions made by private-sector organizations that 

8 provide resources and assistance to military families 

9 and the communities that support them. 

Æ
ATLANTIC OCEAN

BATHYMETRIC MAP” . a . MANTEO |

30" ‘sgo000m.E,

ie ATS SANS
ON LE Aap AG Ses J) )1\

'3930000m.N),

i hj
pH
} mes F

‘08
ene

Boe.

|
i >)
1047
r a5 / 3

CN As dS woh

Sage uae

i By } Cane
igen

Base map information including bathymetry was compiled by the National Ocean Survey
(NOS). Bathymetry was compiled for the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) from NOS
hydrographic surveys supplemented by hydrographic information from other sources (see
index). NOS hydrographic survey data complies with International Hydrographic Organiza-
tion (IHO) Publication 44 accuracy standards or those used at the date of the surveys. This is a
reproduction of a facsmile of the bathymetric manuscript and does not necessarily represent
the final publication. This information ‘is not intended for navigational purposes.

Bathymetric Contour Intervals: 10 meters to 200 meter depth, supplemented by 2 meter inter-
vals, thence 50-meters to maximum depth, supplemented by 10 meter intervals.

Datum: Mean Low Water (MLW).

Universal Transverse Mercator Grid, Zone 18, 10,000 meter ticks (---) are shown inside the
neatline.

Protraction Diagrom data shown in a subdued (screened) black was compiled by the Bureau of
Land Management (BLM).

THIS MAP IS NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT for Federal leasing purposes; for such purposes
use the BLM Outer Continental Shelf Official Protraction Diagrams.

Heavy line(s} indicate limits of these protraction diagrams.

OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF RESOURCE MANAGEMENT MAP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL OCEAN SURVEY

1980
_

Produced at Washington, D.C.
for

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT

TRANSVERSE MERCATOR PROJECTION
Scale 1:250,000
5

5 ° 10 15 20 Statute Miles
5 0 5 10 15 20 25 “30 Kilometers
et

o 5 10 15. Nautical Miles
J

NATIONAL OCEAN SURVEY
HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEY INDEX

ve ~ MANTEO

NOS NI 18- 2 (OCS)

jg: INDEX TO ADJOINING SHEETS |

37°

z
fe
fo)
&
=
xs
a
x

of the above and prior surveys may be obtained, at the cost of reproduction, by
 (C-353), National Ocean Survey, National

reproduction,
ctor ‘Oceanic and Atmospheric
Rockville, Maryland 20852.

er

34°
72°
also for sate by

if
é

e@G'ese :f

i]
#### § 14.17 A claim must be presented to the appropriate agency.

A claimant shall present the claim to the Federal agency whose activities gave rise to the claim. If a claim is erroneously presented to the NRC, the NRC shall transfer it to the appropriate agency, if the proper agency can be identified from the claim, and shall advise the claimant of the transfer. If transfer is not feasible, the NRC shall return the claim to the claimant. The fact of transfer does not, in itself, preclude further transfer, return of the claim to the claimant, or other appropriate disposition of the claim. A claim shall be presented, as required by 28 U.S.C. 2401(b), as of the date it is received by the appropriate agency.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The following schedule contains summarized financial information extracted
from the Questar Pipeline Company Consolidated Statements of Income and
Balance Sheets for the period ended March 31, 1999, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such unaudited financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,893
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,890
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,355
<PP&E>                                         671,908
<DEPRECIATION>                                 219,630
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 529,370
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           61,826
<BONDS>                                        203,007
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,551
<OTHER-SE>                                     192,239
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   529,370
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,166
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,389
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,713
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,177
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,187
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,225
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,962
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,962
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
2146.270-1 Contract clause.

The clause at 2152.246-70 shall be inserted in all FEGLI Program contracts.

Parent topic: Subpart 2146.2 - Contract Quality Requirements
§ 799.11 Actions during NEPA reviews. ( a ) Except as specified in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, FSA or a program participant must not take any action, implement any component of a proposed action, or make any final decision during FSA's NEPA and environmental compliance review process that could have an adverse environmental impact or limit the range of alternatives until FSA completes its environmental review by doing one of the following: ( 1 ) Determines that the proposed action is categorically excluded under NEPA under subpart D of this part and does not trigger any extraordinary circumstances; or
( 2 ) Issues a FONSI or ROD under subpart E or F of this part.
( b ) FSA may approve interim actions related to proposed actions provided the: ( 1 ) Interim actions will not have an adverse environmental impact;
( 2 ) Expenditure is necessary to maintain a schedule for the proposed action;
( 3 ) Interim actions and expenditures will not compromise FSA's environmental compliance review and decision making process for the larger action;
( 4 ) Interim actions and expenditures will not segment otherwise connected actions; and
( 5 ) NEPA and associated environmental compliance review has been completed for the interim action or expenditure.
( c ) FSA and program participants may develop preliminary plans or designs, or perform work necessary to support an application for Federal, State, or local permits or assistance, during the NEPA review process, provided all requirements in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section are met.