alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                        722,927
<SECURITIES>                  0                         <F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                 83,706
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              0
<PP&E>                        12,155,434                <F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                3,154,770
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                10,201,549
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         262,740
<BONDS>                       6,251,189                 <F3>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      2,719,639                 <F4>
<OTHER-SE>                    0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  10,201,549  
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              833,621                   <F5>
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 414,947                   <F6>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              734,127                   <F7>
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0           
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            274,636
<INCOME-PRETAX>               0
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           0
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0       
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (590,089)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 0
<EPS-DILUTED>                 0


<FN>
<F1>   "SECURITIES" REPRESENTS INVESTMENT IN JOINT VENTURE
<F2>   "PP&E" REPRESENTS INVESTMENT IN REAL ESTATE [LAND AND
BUILDING]
<F3>   "BONDS" REPRESENTS MORTGAGES PAYABLE
<F4>   "COMMON" REPRESENTS TOTAL PARTNERS CAPITAL
<F5>   "TOTAL REVENUES" REPRESENTS RENTAL, INTEREST, AND OTHER
INCOME
<F6>   "TOTAL COSTS" REPRESENTS TOTAL EXPENSES LESS INTEREST
EXPENSE
<F7>   "OTHER EXPENSES" REPRESENTS INTEREST IN JOINT VENTURES' NET
INCOME/LOSS
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

PROGRESSIVE AM. INS. CO., )

 )

Plaintiff, )

 ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv717-ID

v. )

 )

CAROL THORN, et al., )

 )

Defendants. )

ORDER

Upon CONSIDERATION of Plaintiff Progressive American Insurance Co.’s

motion to extend time for service upon Defendants, filed March 9, 2007 (Doc. No. 25),

and for good cause shown, it is ORDERED that said motion be and the same is hereby

GRANTED and that the time for Plaintiff to perfect service on the remaining Defendants

be and the same is hereby EXTENDED to and including April 20, 2007.

DONE this 9th day of March, 2007.

 /s/ Ira DeMent 

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 26 Filed 03/09/2007 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.2
THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE
GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, INC. 
STOCK OPTION PLAN
GWR Global Water Resources Corp., a British Columbia corporation (“GWRC”), previously established the GWR Global Water Resources Corp. Stock Option Plan approved as of January 9, 2012 (as amended, the “Prior Plan”).  GWRC was restructured and merged with and into Global Water Resources, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”).  Effective as of May 3, 2016, the name of the Prior Plan was changed to the Global Water Resources, Inc. Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”).
1.This Third Amendment shall be effective as of the date on which it is executed.
2.Section 7 (Exercise of Options) is hereby amended by the addition of a new Section 7.4 to read as follows:
7.4    As determined by the Committee and to the extent permitted by applicable statutes and regulations, the Option Price for any Option, including those outstanding and unexercised as of the effective date of this Third Amendment, may be paid by any net-issuance or cashless exercise arrangement (including any broker-assisted “cashless” exercise arrangement).
3.This Third Amendment shall supersede the provisions of the Plan to the extent those provisions are inconsistent with the provisions and intent of this Third Amendment.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Third Amendment to be executed as of this 7th day of March, 2018.
Global Water Resources, Inc.
/s/ Ron L. Fleming        
By:Ron L. Fleming                    
Its: CEO and President    










4811-7623-5870.1
#### § 990.2 State and Tribal plans; General authority.

States or Indian Tribes desiring to have primary regulatory authority over the production of hemp in the State or territory of the Indian Tribe shall submit to the Secretary for approval, through the State department of agriculture (in consultation with the Governor and chief law enforcement officer of the State) or the Tribal government, as applicable, a plan under which the State or Indian Tribe monitors and regulates that production.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1071 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1071

  Recognizing the 25th anniversary of the independence of Belize and 
    extending best wishes to Belize for peace and further progress, 
                      development, and prosperity.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 29, 2006

 Ms. Lee (for herself, Mr. Rangel, Mrs. Christensen, Mr. Meeks of New 
 York, Mr. Berman, Mr. Cummings, Mr. Payne, and Ms. Carson) submitted 
   the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                        International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Recognizing the 25th anniversary of the independence of Belize and 
    extending best wishes to Belize for peace and further progress, 
                      development, and prosperity.

Whereas Belize gained full independence from the United Kingdom on September 21, 
        1981, and was established as a sovereign and independent country;
Whereas since Belize became an independent country, the interests of Belize and 
        the United States have been closely aligned;
Whereas the people of Belize have established a unique, pluralistic 
        parliamentary democracy which includes freedoms cherished by the people 
        of the United States, including freedom of speech, freedom of religion, 
        freedom of association, and freedom of the press;
Whereas Belize continues to serve as a model of democratic values by regularly 
        holding free and fair elections, and promoting a free exchange of ideas;
Whereas the bonds of association and friendship between the peoples of the two 
        countries have been strengthened by the number of Belizeans who have 
        migrated to the United States, where they make significant contributions 
        to both the United States and Belize; and
Whereas Belize is an integral member of both the Central American and Caribbean 
        regions, and is a constructive partner of the United States in 
        fulfilling the agenda of the Western Hemisphere: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the 25th anniversary of the independence of 
        Belize;
            (2) extends warm congratulations and best wishes to Belize 
        for peace, prosperity, and further progress; and
            (3) extends best wishes to Belizeans and Belizean-Americans 
        residing in the United States as they celebrate the 25th 
        anniversary of Belize's independence.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 13.1

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F (the Report) of QIWI plc (the Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2015 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, Sergey Solonin, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Alexander Karavaev, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.



|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Sergey Solonin    
|Name:                  |  | Sergey Solonin         
|Title:                 |  | Chief Executive Officer
|Date:                  |  | March 15, 2016         
|                      
|/s/ Alexander Karavaev
|Name:                  |  | Alexander Karavaev     
|Title:                 |  | Chief Financial Officer
|Date:                  |  | March 15, 2016         

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
§ 1008.13 Fees. ( a ) The only fees to be charged to or collected from an individual under the provisions of this part are for copying records at the request of the individual. The fee charged shall be consistent with the fee schedule set forth in paragraph (b) of this section. ( 1 ) No fees shall be charged or collected for the following: Search for and retrieval of records; review of records; copying by the DOE incident to granting access; copying at the initiative of the DOE without a request from the individual; copying when the aggregate of fees for copying is $25 or less; time spent providing copies; transportation of records and personnel; and first class postage.
( 2 ) It is the policy of the DOE to provide an individual with one copy of each record corrected or amended pursuant to request without charge.
( 3 ) As required by the Office of Personnel Management in its published regulations implementing the Act, the DOE will charge no fee for a single copy of a personnel record covered by that Commission's Government-wide published notice of systems of records.
( b ) The schedule of fees is as follows: ( 1 ) $.10 per copy of each page.
( 2 ) For other forms of copying and other forms of materials (e.g., cassettes, computer materials), the direct cost of the materials, personnel, and equipment shall be charged, but only with prior specific approval of the person making the request, when such charges would be in excess of $25.
( c ) The Privacy Act Officer may, upon application by an individual, furnish any records without charge or at a reduced rate, if the Privacy Act Officer determines that such waiver or reduction of fees is in the public interest.
( d ) Payment shall be made by check or money order payable to the United States Department of Energy.
( e ) Advance payment of all or part of the fees may be required at the discretion of the Privacy Act Officer. Unless the individual requesting the copies specifically states that he is willing to pay whatever fees are assessed for meeting the request or, alternatively, specifies an amount in excess of $25 that he is willing to pay and which in fact covers the anticipated fees for meeting the request, a request that is expected to involve assessed fees in excess of $25 shall not be deemed to have been received, for purposes of the time periods specified in §§ 1008.7 and 1008.10 until the individual making the request is notified of the anticipated cost, agrees to bear it, and makes any advance deposit required. Such notification shall be made by the Privacy Act Officer as promptly as possible after receipt of the request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                            1453
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   275000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (275000)
<INVENTORY>                                       7506
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 82269
<PP&E>                                           25462
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (10964)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   96767
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           540155
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         83
<COMMON>                                         70995
<OTHER-SE>                                    12197355
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     96767
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                808329
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   9
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (947838)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (800)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (948638)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (948638)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>
162 So.2d 572

#### Blanchard RALEY v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY et al. NEW YORK UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. Ezelle P. HUCKABAY et al.

No. 47182.

April 17, 1964.

In re: Hartford Accident & Indemnity ■Company and New York Underwriters Insurance Company applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, •Second Circuit, Parish of Red River. 160 •So.2d 267.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, we find no error of law ■in its judgment.
302.101 Definitions.       (a) *Agency head or head of the agency,* unless otherwise stated, means the Secretary of Health and Human Services or specified designee.          (b) *Contracting Officer's Representative (COR)* is a Federal employee designated in writing by a contracting officer to act as the contracting officer's representative in monitoring and administering specified aspects of contractor performance *after* award of a contract or order. In accordance with local procedures, operating divisions (OPDIVs) or staff divisions (STAFFDIVs) may designate CORs for firm fixed-price contracts or orders. COR's responsibilities may include verifying that:          (1) The contractor's performance meets the standards set forth in the contract or order;          (2) The contractor meets the contract or order's technical requirements by the specified delivery date(s) or within the period of performance; and          (3) The contractor performs within cost ceiling stated in the contract or order. CORs must meet the training and certification requirements specified in PGI 301.604.          (c) *Head of the Contracting Activity (HCA)* is an official having overall responsibility for managing a contracting activity, *i.e.* the organization within an OPDIV or STAFFDIV or other HHS organization which has been delegated broad authority regarding the conduct of acquisition functions.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 302.1 - Definitions
1427.306 Licensing background patent rights

to third parties.

Any proposed determination to be made to require third party licensing shall be submitted by the

HCA through the Assistant Solicitor for Acquisitions and Intellectual Property for signature of the

AS/PMB. The contractor may request a public hearing on the record prior to the above

determination. In such cases, the proposed determination and the contractor's request for a hearing

shall be referred to OHA. OHA shall conduct public hearings as set forth in 1427.304-1(a)(4) and

shall forward its findings and recommendations to the AS/PMB for a final determination. The final

determination shall inform the contractor of the right to judicial review within sixty (60) days of the

AS/PMB determination.

Parent topic: Subpart 1427.3 - Patent Rights Under Government Contracts.
#### § 984.76 Other reports.

Upon request of the Board made with the approval of the Secretary each handler shall furnish such other reports and information as are needed to enable the Board to perform its duties and exercise its powers under this subpart.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          13,372
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,972
<PP&E>                                      20,703,908
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,718,880
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,950
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,095
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,716,813
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,718,880
<SALES>                                         17,221
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,221
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,019
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,592
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,390)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,390)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,390)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.00)
        

</TABLE>
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-22-00217-CR

Richard Shane Knight

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

36th District Court of Aransas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. A-22-5033-CR

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 20, 2023
#### Vincent Mennuto, Appellant, v. John M. Ludgey et al., Respondents.

Greenblott, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered May 16, 1968 in Ulster County, which denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. In this negligence case, arising out of an accident on the New York State Thruway, appellant was traveling north in the center lane of the three northbound lanes. In the right lane, a truck, pulling a a boat on a trailer owned by respondent Hummel’s Marine Supply Company, Inc., and driven by its employee, respondent Ganter, was proceeding in the same direction. In the far left or mall lane, respondent Ludgey was operating a car rented from respondent Hertz Corporation. Appellant contends that while the Hummel truck was swaying to and fro, causing appellant’s vehicle, as well as others, to slow down, the Ludgey car suddenly applied its brakes and without warning, crossed over into appellant’s lane of travel and struck the left rear of appellant’s vehicle, causing the damages sued for. Special Term properly held that issues of fact are presented on the question of respondents' negligence as well as appellant’s freedom from contributory negligence. The affidavit of respondent Ganter discloses that he did not know of the accident at all until he had been sued, never having been stopped at the time. Furthermore, he denies the charge of excessive speed. Denial of summary judgment against respondents Ganter and Hummel’s Marine Supply Company, Inc., was proper under the rule of *Terranova*v. *Emil*(20 N Y 2d 493, 497), which precludes such determination in the ease where knowledge of the facts is exclusively with the movant and a material portion of the defense might be expected to be conducted by cross-examination. Respondent Ludgey disputes whether an accident actually happened, and whether appellant suffered any damage inasmuch as he contends that no damage was apparent on his own car. In any event, there is sufficient here to present questions as to respondents’ negligence and if established, the further issue of proximate cause, as well as appellant’s contributory negligence, all of which must be reserved for the triers of the facts. Order affirmed, with costs. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., Greenblott and Sweeney, JJ., concur in memorandum by Greenblott, J.