alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# SUBCHAPTER B—ACQUISITION PLANNING   

- PART 3405—PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONS 
- PART 3406—COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS 
- PART 3407—ACQUISITION PLANNING 
- PART 3408—REQUIRED SOURCES OF SUPPLIES AND SERVICES 
- PART 3409—CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS 
- PART 3412—ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES 

- PART 3405—PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONS    - Subpart 3405.2—Synopses of Proposed Contract Actions     - 3405.202   Exceptions.
    - 3405.203   Publicizing and response time.
    - 3405.205   Special situations.
    - 3405.207   Preparation and transmittal of synopses.
    - 3405.270   Notices to perform market surveys.
  - Subpart 3405.5—Paid Advertisements     - 3405.502   Authority.
- PART 3406—COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS    - 3406.001   Applicability.
  - Subpart 3406.3—Other Than Full and Open Competition     - 3406.302-2   Unusual and compelling urgency.
    - 3406.302-5   Authorized or required by statute.
  - Subpart 3406.5—Advocates for Competition     - 3406.501   Requirement.
- PART 3407—ACQUISITION PLANNING    - Subpart 3407.1—Acquisition Plans     - 3407.103   Agency-head responsibilities.
- PART 3408—REQUIRED SOURCES OF SUPPLIES AND SERVICES    - Subpart 3408.8—Acquisition of Printing and Related Supplies     - 3408.871   Paperwork reduction.
- PART 3409—CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS    - Subpart 3409.4—Debarment, Suspension, and Ineligibility     - 3409.400   Scope of subpart.
    - 3409.401   Applicability.
    - 3409.403   Definitions.
    - 3409.406   Debarment.
    - 3409.406-3   Procedures.
    - 3409.407   Suspension.
    - 3409.407-3   Procedures.
  - Subpart 3409.5—Organizational and Consultant Conflicts of Interest     - 3409.502   Applicability.
    - 3409.503   Waiver.
    - 3409.506   Procedures.
    - 3409.507   Solicitation provision and contract clause.
    - 3409.507-1   Solicitation provision.
    - 3409.507-2   Contract clause.
- PART 3412—ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES    - Subpart 3412.2—Special Requirements for the Acquisition of Commercial Products and Commercial Services     - 3412.203   Procedures for solicitation, evaluation, and award.
  - Subpart 3412.3—Solicitation Provisions and Contract Clauses for the Acquisition of Commercial Products and Commercial Services     - 3412.301   Solicitation provisions and contract clauses for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services.
    - 3412.302   Tailoring of provisions and clauses for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

July 20, 2007

NOTICE OF CORRECTION

From: Clerk’s Office

Case Style: Progressive American vs. Carol Thorn, et al

Case Number: 2:06cv717-ID

Pleading : #62 - Answer

Notice of Correction is being filed this date to advise that the referenced pleading that was

e-filed on 7/16/2007 listed the incorrect party in the title of the pleading.

 The corrected pdf document is attached to this notice.

Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 65 Filed 07/20/2007 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN )

INSURANCE COMPANY, )

)

PLAINTIFFS-STAKEHOLDERS, )

)

V. ) Civil Action No.: CV-06-717.ID

)

CAROL THORN, et al., )

)

DEFENDANTS-CLAIMANTS. )

ANSWER OF DEFENDANT LV STABLER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL

TO AMENDED COMPLAINT

Comes now the Defendant sued as LV Stabler Memorial Hospital (correctly identified as

Greenville Hospital Corporation d/b/a LV Stabler Memorial Hospital) , and for Answer to Plaintiff’s

Amended Complaint says as follows:

 1. Without sufficient information to admit or deny, therefore denied.

 2. Without sufficient information to admit or deny, therefore denied.

 3. Without sufficient information to admit or deny, therefore denied.

 4. Without sufficient information to admit or deny, therefore denied.

 5. Without sufficient information to admit or deny, therefore denied.

 6. Without sufficient information to admit or deny, therefore denied.

 7. Without sufficient information to admit or deny, therefore denied.

 8. Without sufficient information to admit or deny, therefore denied.

 9. Without sufficient information to admit or deny, therefore denied.

Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 65-2 Filed 07/20/2007 Page 1 of 3
10. Admitted.

11. Admitted.

In addition , Defendant Hospital claims that it is entitled to an amount of the insurance

proceeds equal to the amount of benefits and services provided by it to the patients treated at its

facility.

/s/ Greer B. Mallette 

Richard E. Smith

Greer B. Mallette

Attorneys for defendant Greenville Hospital

Corporation d/b/a L.V. Stabler Memorial Hospital

OF COUNSEL:

CHRISTIAN & SMALL LLP

ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS

505 20TH STREET NORTH - SUITE 1800

BIRMINGHAM AL 35203-2696

(205) 795-6588

(205) 328-7234 Facsimile

Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 65-2 Filed 07/20/2007 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have this date served a copy of the foregoing pleading upon all counsel

of record in this cause by placing a copy of same in the United States mail, postage prepaid,

addressed as follows on this the 16th day of July , 2007:

Mathew Richardson

Sidney W. Jackson, III

Jackson, Foster & Graham

P.O. Box 2225

R. Larry Bradford

Bradford & Sears, P.C.

2020 Canyon Road, Suite 100

Birmingham, AL 35216

Jimmie R. Ippolito, Jr.

1409 Coliseum Boulevard

Montgomery, AL 36130

/s/ Greer B. Mallette 

OF COUNSEL

Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 65-2 Filed 07/20/2007 Page 3 of 3
Subpart 1414.2 - Solicitation of Bids    **Parent topic:** PART 1414 - SEALED BIDDING1414.201 Preparation of invitation for bids.1414.201-70 Alternate bids.       (a) Solicitations for supplies or services (other than construction) shall specify whether alternate bids are permitted, provide instructions for submitting alternate bids and clearly indicate how alternate bids will be evaluated.          (b) The clause set forth in 1452.236-71 may be used in non-construction contracts where additive and deductive alternate bids will be permitted.
#### St. Joseph Hospital of Cheektowaga et al., Appellants, v Antonia C. Novello, as New York State Health Commissioner, et al., Respondents.

Submitted November 5, 2007;

decided November 27, 2007

Reported below, 43 AD3d 139.

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Peter Ignizio, Appellant, v Eber Bros. & Co., Inc., et al., Respondents. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed May 22, 1979, which found that claimant did not sustain a causally related disability on April 18, 1977. The board found: "The medica],' evidence, particularly the testimony of Dr. Currie and Dr. Cristo, indicates that the claimant had an underlying pre-existing diabetes and arteriosclerotic heart disease and as a result of work effort on April 18, 1977 did not sustain a myocardial infarction but his work effort that day produced an episode of angina pectoris, further claimant’s testimony indicates he has stopped work because of his condition and not because he had a causally related disability.” Substantial evidence in the record supports the determination of the board. Decision affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Kane, Main and Mikoll, JJ., concur.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF 

JOSE LIDIO ROMO,

 

 Appellants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-16-00034-CV

Appeal from the

Probate Court No. 1

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2009-P00624)

O R D E R

The Court has considered the Appellant’s motion to file the clerk’s record and reporter’s 

record previously filed in cause number 08-13-00271-CV and concludes that the motion should 

be GRANTED in part. Appellant’s request to file the Appellant’s brief previously filed in cause 

number 08-13-00271-CV is DENIED. The clerk’s record filed on September 26, 2013, the 

supplemental clerk’s record filed on December 17, 2013, and the reporter’s record filed on 

October 31, 2013 in cause number 08-13-00271-CV will be filed in the above styled and 

numbered cause. The Clerk’s record does not contain a final judgment. Consequently, 

Appellant shall request and make financial arrangements to pay for a supplemental clerk’s record 

containing the final judgment and any other documents necessary for this appeal. The 

supplemental clerk’s record is due to be filed in this Court no later than May 14, 2016. 

Appellant’s brief shall be due thirty days from the date the supplemental clerk’s record is filed.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 14

th day of April, 2016.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Hughes, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
               RULE 13a-14(b)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gallery of History, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Todd Axelrod, Chief Executive Office of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

1.	 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Todd Axelrod
Todd Axelrod
Chief Executive Officer

February 14, 2006



A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intervoice, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Rob-Roy
J. Graham, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     3.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     4.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




Date: January 14, 2003
                                     /s/ Rob-Roy J. Graham
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Rob-Roy J. Graham
                                     Executive Vice President and Chief
                                     Financial Officer
# Subpart 1349.1 - General Principles

**Parent topic:**PART 1349 - TERMINATION OF CONTRACTS

## 1349.106 Fraud or other criminal conduct.

If the terminating contracting officer (TCO) suspects fraud or other criminal conduct related to the settlement of a terminated contract, the TCO shall immediately discontinue negotiations and prepare a written report concerning the matter. The report shall be submitted to the Bureau Procurement Official, the Office of Inspector General, and the DOC suspension and debarring official. An informational copy shall be provided to Procurement Counsel.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION 

CINCINNATI INSURANCE ) 

COMPANY ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

v. ) CV-3:06-CV-733-MHT

 ) 

JOSEPH DONALD PRATHER and ) 

LINDA PRATHER ) 

 Defendants. ) 

 ) 

PLAINTIFF’S FIRST SET OF REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS

 COMES NOW, both Plaintiff in the referenced matter and pursuant to Rule 33, FED. R.

CIV. P., and propounds this its First Set of Request for Admissions to Linda Prather: 

1. Admit that neither your daughter, Tracy Swader, nor your son-in-law, Jason 

Swader, were resident members of your household during the time period of 

March 26, 2005 to March 26, 2006. 

2. Admit that neither Jason Swader nor Tracey Swader were listed as additional 

insureds on the policy of insurance bearing number A010134532 with effective 

dates of March 26, 2005 to March 26, 2006. 

3. Admit that you did not bargain for either Tracy Swader or Jason Swader to be 

insureds on the referenced policy of insurance. 

4. Admit that you and/or your husband made endorsements to the referenced policy 

of insurance to add vehicles. 

Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 20 Filed 04/11/2007 Page 1 of 4
2

5. Admit that when additional vehicles were added to the policy that neither you nor 

Mr. Prather added Tracy Swader nor Jason Swader as named insureds on the 

policy. 

 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, 

 /s/ Jennifer T. Dewees

 Jennifer T. Dewees (ASB1265S35J) 

 Attorney for Plaintiff, Cincinnati Insurance 

 Company 

 2001 Park Place Tower, Suite 911 

 Birmingham, AL 35203 

 205-251-9958 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that a copy of the above and foregoing has been electronically filed with the 

Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following 

on this the 9th day of April, 2007: 

Timothy L. Dillard 

Dillard and Associates, LLC 

The Berry Building, Suite 400 

2015 Second Avenue North 

Birmingham, Alabama 35203 

205-251-2823 

dillard&horn@aol.com 

Stephen D. Heninger 

Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC 

P.O. Box 11310 

Birmingham, AL 35202 

205-326-3336 

steph@hgdlawfirm.com 

Steven Bullard 

1405 16th Place 

Valley, AL 36854 

Service by Mail 

Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 20 Filed 04/11/2007 Page 2 of 4
3

 Respectfully Submitted, 

 

/s/Jennifer T. Dewees_____________

 Jennifer T. Dewees, #ASB1265S35J 

 2001 Park Place North 

 Suite 911 

 Birmingham, Alabama 35203 

 (205) 251-9958 

 Jennifer_Dewees@staffdefense.com

Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 20 Filed 04/11/2007 Page 3 of 4
4

 

Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 20 Filed 04/11/2007 Page 4 of 4
#### 206 E. 63rd St. Corp., Appellant, v Lorin E. Price, Respondent.

*599In an action to recover payment of a loan, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered February 22, 1979, which, *inter alia,*granted defendant’s motion to vacate a default judgment and ordered that the summons with notice be deemed served personally on the defendant on February 13, 1979. Order modified by striking from the third decretal paragraph thereof the date "February 13, 1979” and substituting therefor the date "April 25, 1978”. As so modified, order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to appellant. The order of substituted service dated March 31, 1978 required that service be made "by personally serving a person of suitable age and discretion at the Defendant’s place of business”. On April 25, 1978 the process server knocked on the frosted glass door of defendant’s office and a man inside asked what he had. The server stated he had some legal documents for the defendant. The door opened approximately six inches whereupon the man saw that the process server had a summons; he immediately closed the door. Thereupon the process server inserted the summons with notice in the mail chute and observed the individual behind the frosted glass door remove and take the papers. This act on the part of the person occupying defendant’s place of business, together with the mailing as directed, constituted sufficient service to comply with the order (cf. *Chernick v Rodriquez,*2 Misc 2d 891). Hopkins, J. P., Lazer, Gibbons and Rabin, JJ., concur.
#### § 927.29 Vacancies.

To fill any vacancy occasioned by the failure of any person selected as a member or as an alternate for a member of the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee to qualify, or in the event of death, removal, resignation, or disqualification of any qualified member or qualified alternate for a member, a successor for his or her unexpired term shall be nominated and selected in the manner set forth in §§ 927.20 to 927.35. If nominations to fill any such vacancy are not made within 20 days after such vacancy occurs, the Secretary may fill such vacancy without regard to nominations.
936.7101 Construction contracts.       (a) Inspection services may be performed by the architect-engineer responsible for the design. Inspection services may not be procured from a construction contractor with respect to its own work.          (b) When one contractor is to inspect the work of another, the inspection contractor will be given written instructions defining its responsibilities and stating that it is not authorized to modify the terms and conditions of the contract, to direct additional work, to waive any requirements of the contract, or to settle any claim or dispute. Copies of the instructions will be given to the contractor who is to be inspected, with a request to acknowledge receipt on a copy to be returned to the contracting officer. In this manner, both contractors are on express notice of the authority and limitations of the authority of the inspecting contractor.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 936.71 - Inspection and Acceptance
Subpart 2905.1 - Dissemination of

Information

Parent topic: PART 2905 - PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONS

2905.101 Methods of disseminating information.

Contracting officers may only use the Government Point of Entry (GPE) for synopsis and

dissemination of information concerning procurement actions. The Division of Acquisition

Management Services manages the DOL account.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3294 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3294

 To suspend temporarily the duty on electric juice extractors greater 
                than 300 watts but less than 400 watts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 26, 2006

   Mr. Allen introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on electric juice extractors greater 
                than 300 watts but less than 400 watts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELECTRIC JUICE EXTRACTORS GREATER THAN 300 WATTS BUT LESS 
              THAN 400 WATTS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.85.16        Electric juice          Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           extractors greater                                                31/2009          ''
                           than 300 watts but                                                                  .
                           less than 400 watts
                           (provided for in
                           subheading
                           8509.40.00)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Village of Pomona, Appellant, v Town of Ramapo et al., Respondents.

Submitted August 27, 2007;

decided November 20, 2007

Reported below, 41 AD3d 837.

*982Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
National Property Investors 8 1998 First Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified 
in its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000763701
<NAME> NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS 8
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998   
<CASH>                                           2,140
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          30,070
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,380   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,013   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         10,908     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0     
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,381    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,013    
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,229    
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,076    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 232    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       153     
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.36<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1


Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company
    for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the
    Report) fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
|
| | (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                    



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ WILLIAM J. GERVAIS 
| |                        
| | William J. Gervais     
| | Chief Executive Officer