alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Mineral resources of theBarbours Creek and Shawvers Run wilderness study areas, Craig County, Virginia:an evaluation of the mineral potential of two study areas**
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:1758
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000594813
 
Report | Plate
 
February 26, 2020
Opinion filed January 6, 2022

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-21-00242-CR

__________

PAUL WAYNE PALMER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Taylor County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2-285-20

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant has filed in this court a motion to dismiss his appeal. Appellant 

asserts in his motion that he wishes to withdraw his notice of appeal and dismiss this 

appeal. The motion to dismiss is signed by both Appellant and Appellant’s counsel 

in compliance with Rule 42.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. 

The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. 

January 6, 2022 PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., 

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 238 (Monday, December 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 77662]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31141]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY AND WATER COMMISSION, UNITED STATES AND MEXICO


United States Section; Notice of Availability of a Final 
Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact for 
Arroyo Colorado South Levee Rehabilitation Project in Cameron and 
Hidalgo Counties, TX

AGENCY: United States Section, International Boundary and Water 
Commission, United States and Mexico (USIBWC).

ACTION: Notice of Availability of Final Environmental Assessment (EA) 
and Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental 
Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, the Council on Environmental Quality Final 
Regulations (40 CFR Parts 1500 through 1508), and the United States 
Section`s Operational Procedures for Implementing Section 102 of NEPA, 
published in the Federal Register September 2, 1981, (46 FR 44083); the 
USIBWC hereby gives notice of availability of the Final Environmental 
Assessment and FONSI for Arroyo Colorado South Levee Rehabilitation 
Project located in Cameron and Hidalgo Counties, Texas are available. 
An environmental impact statement will not be prepared.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa Santana, Natural Resources 
Specialist, Environmental Management Division, United States Section, 
International Boundary and Water Commission; 4171 N. Mesa, C-100; El 
Paso, Texas 79902. Telephone: (915) 832-4707; e-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dfb3b6acbef1acbeb1abbeb1be9fb6bda8bcf1b8b0a9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6a0603190b44190b041e0b040b2a03081d09440d051c">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Availability: Single hard copies of the Final Environmental 
Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact are available by 
request at the above address. Electronic copies are available from the 
USIBWC homepage at http://www.ibwc.gov/Organization/Environmental/reports_studies.html.

    Dated: December 6, 2010.
Steven Fitten,
Attorney.
[FR Doc. 2010-31141 Filed 12-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7010-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### R.P.M. Stationery Corp. et al., Respondents, v Fred Colin et al., Individually and Doing Business as Comar Babylon Co. et al., Appellants.

In an action, *inter alia,*for an accounting and to declare that plaintiffs are not obligated under various leases to pay for certain structural repairs, defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated January 23, 1980, as (1) denied their cross motion to dismiss the causes of action asserted in the complaint and (2) removed to the Supreme Court two summary proceedings that had been brought by the defendants in the District Court, Suffolk County. Order modified, on the law, by deleting therefrom the provisions that the cross motion is denied in its entirety, and substituting therefor a provision that the cross motion is granted to the extent that the second and fifth causes of action are dismissed and that the cross motion is otherwise denied. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. Plaintiffs’ second cause of action seeks to enjoin defendants from instituting summary proceedings, although such proceedings already have been instituted and are to be tried jointly with this action. The cause of action is thus moot. The fifth cause of action seeking class action status palpably lacks merit. We are sustaining the first cause of action on the theory that it can be read to state a cause of action for quasi contract or restitution, since an accounting does not seem to lie here. Hopkins, J. P., Lazer, Gibbons and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
| (1)   | Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Global Health Ventures Inc.  |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: August 30, 2010 |   | /s/ Audrey Lew               |   |
|-----------------------|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|                  |   | Audrey Lew                   |   |
|                  |   | Principal Accounting Officer |   |
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3206 

To suspend temporarily the duty on a certain infrared absorbing dye. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. LAUTENBERG introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on a certain infrared 

absorbing dye. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INFRARED ABSORBING DYE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.29.43 1H-Benz[e]indolium, 2-[2-[2-chloro-3- 

[(1,3-dihydro-1,1,3-trimethyl-2Hbenz[e]indol-2-ylidene)ethylidene]-1- 

cyclohexen-1-yl]ethenyl]-1,1,3-trimethyl-, 

salt with 4-methylbenzenesulfonic acid 

(1:1) (CAS No. 134127–48–3) (provided 

for in subheading 2934.99.90) ................ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 3206 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to goods entered, 

3 or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the date that is 15 days after the date of enactment of 

5 this Act. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
Appendixes G–H to Chapter 7 [Reserved]

Parent topic: SUBCHAPTER H—CLAUSES AND FORMS
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 33 Filed 04/18/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 33 Filed 04/18/2007 Page 2 of 2
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**TitleTeamNutrition connections:**** 
SuDocNumber:A98.2:N 95/6/
ItemNumber:0074-A-01(online)
CGPsystem Number:000874384
 
Connections8
Connections9**
#### § 1039.1 Uniform relocation assistance and real property acquisition.

Regulations and procedures for complying with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Pub. L. 91-646, 84 Stat. 1894, 42 U.S.C. 4601), as amended by the Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1987 (Title IV of Pub. L. 100-17, 101 Stat. 246-255, 42 U.S.C. 4601 note) are set forth in 49 CFR part 24.

[52 FR 48017, Dec. 17, 1987; 54 FR 8912, 8913, Mar. 2, 1989]
###### Editorial Note on Part 982

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 61 FR 17559, Apr. 22, 1996.

#### § 982.101 Grade requirements for shelled hazelnuts.

(a) Pursuant to § 982.45(a), no handler shall handle any shelled hazelnuts unless such hazelnuts meet the grade requirements for shelled hazelnuts as contained in exhibit A of this section.

(b) Pursuant to §§ 982.50(a) and 982.51(b), a handler may declare and withhold shelled hazelnuts in lieu of merchantable hazelnuts in satisfaction of the handler's restricted obligation. Shelled hazelnuts so declared and withheld shall, in lieu of the standards prescribed in § 982.50(a)(3), meet the grade requirements contained in exhibit A of this section.

# Exhibit A

## Grade Requirements for Shelled Hazelnuts

Hazelnut kernels or portions of hazelnut kernels shall meet the following requirements:

(1) Well dried and clean;

(2) Free from foreign material, mold, rancidity, decay or insect injury; and

(3) Free from serious damage caused by serious shriveling, or other means.

## Tolerances

In order to allow for variations incident to proper grading and handling the following tolerances, by weight, are permitted as specified:

(1) For Foreign Material: 0.02 of one percent, for foreign material.

(2) For Defects: Five percent for kernels or portions of kernels which are below the requirements of this grade, including not more than the following: Two percent for mold, rancidity, decay or insect injury: *Provided,* That not more than one percent shall be for mold, rancidity, or insect injury.

## Definitions

(1) *Well dried* means that the kernels are firm and crisp, not containing more than 6 percent moisture.

(2) *Clean* means practically free from plainly visible adhering dirt or other foreign material.

(3) *Foreign material* means any substance other than the hazelnut kernels, or portions of kernels. (Loose skins, pellicles or corky tissue which have become separated from the kernels shall not be considered as foreign material, provided that this material does not exceed .02 of one percent by weight.)

(4) *Serious damage* means any specific defect described in this section, or any equally objectionable variation of any one of these defects, or any other defects, or any combination of defects, which seriously detracts from the appearance or the edible or marketing quality of the individual portion of the kernel or of the lot as a whole. The following defects shall be considered as serious damage.

(i) *Serious shriveling* means when the kernel is seriously shrunken, wrinkled and tough.

(ii) *Mold* means that there is a visible growth of mold either on the outside or inside of the kernel.

(iii) *Rancidity* means that the kernel is noticeably rancid to the taste. An oily appearance of the flesh does not necessarily indicate a rancid condition.

(iv) *Decay* means that any portion of the kernel is decomposed.

(v) *Insect injury* means that the insect, frass or web is present, or the kernel or portion of kernel show definite evidence of insect feeding.

[47 FR 12611, Mar. 24, 1982, as amended at 48 FR 34015, July 27, 1983]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,976
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,702
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         32
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,229
<PP&E>                                           5,809
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,176
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,410
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              996
<BONDS>                                            104
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            24
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,519
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,410
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,765
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,489
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   505
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   8
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    688
<INCOME-TAX>                                       252
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                436
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       436
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25


</TABLE>
1436.603 Collecting data on and appraising firms' qualifications.       HCAs who require architect-engineer services shall use their established procedures to collect data on and appraising firms' qualifications.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1436.6 - Architect-Engineer Services
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

OWEN J. ROGAL, D.D.S., P.C., 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

SKILSTAF, INC., 

 Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CIVIL ACTION NO. 

3:06-cv-00711-MHT

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Defendant Skilstaf, Inc. hereby moves the Court to enter summary 

judgment in its favor and against Plaintiff. As grounds for this motion, 

Defendant relies on the pleadings, the evidentiary materials filed under seal 

with this motion, and the supporting brief (including the evidentiary 

materials attached thereto), all of which has been submitted 

contemporaneously herewith. 

WHEREFORE, Defendant respectfully requests this Court to enter 

summary judgment in its favor and against Plaintiff. 

 

Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 36 Filed 04/09/2007 Page 1 of 3
2

Respectfully Submitted, 

 s/Charles A. Stewart III 

Charles A. Stewart III (STE067) 

Bradley Arant Rose & White LLP

The Alabama Center for Commerce 

401 Adams Avenue, Suite 780 

Montgomery, AL 36104 

Telephone: (334) 956-7700 

Facsimile: (334) 956-7701 

cstewart@bradleyarant.com

 s/Amelia T. Driscoll 

Amelia T. Driscoll (DRI016) 

Bradley Arant Rose & White LLP

1819 Fifth Avenue North 

Birmingham, AL 35203-2104 

Telephone: (205) 521-8000 

Facsimile: (205) 521-8800 

adriscoll@bradleyarant.com

Attorneys for Defendant 

Skilstaf, Inc. 

Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 36 Filed 04/09/2007 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on April 9th, 2007, I electronically filed the 

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will 

send notification of such filing to the following: 

Robert E. Cole 

437 Chestnut Street, Suite 218 

Philadelphia, PA 19109 

Beth A. Friel 

Jeanne L. Bakker 

Mongtomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads 

123 South Broad Street 

Philadelphia, PA 19109 

and I hereby certify that I have mailed by U. S. Postal Service the document 

to the following non-CM/ECF participants: None. 

/s/ Amelia T. Driscoll 

Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 36 Filed 04/09/2007 Page 3 of 3
§ 966.120 Application for Certificate of Privilege. ( a ) Whenever handling is regulated pursuant to § 966.54, each handler desiring to make shipments of tomatoes for any of the following purposes shall, prior thereto, apply to the committee for and obtain a Certificate of Privilege permitting such shipment: ( 1 ) For pickling, or
( 2 ) For processing, or
( 3 ) For experimental purposes, or
( 4 ) For relief or charity, or
( 5 ) For export, or
( 6 ) For other purposes which may be specified by the committee, with the approval of the Secretary.
( b ) Applications for Certificates of Privilege shall be made on forms furnished by the committee. Each application shall contain the name and address of the handler, and such other information as such committee may require, such as, but not limited, to the quantity (by grade, size, quality, and variety) of tomatoes to be shipped, the mode of transportation, consignee, destination, and other appropriate information or documents necessary to safeguard against the entry of such tomatoes into trade channels other than those for which the Certificate of Privilege is granted.
[21 FR 353, Jan. 19, 1956. Redesignated at 26 FR 12751, Dec. 30, 1961, as amended at 59 FR 51091, Oct. 7, 1994]
Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 4 Filed 12/06/2005 Page 1 of 3 Case 2:05-cv-06073-JCJ Document 4 Filed 12/06/2005 Page 1 of 3

Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 4 Filed 12/06/2005 Page 2 of 3 Case 2:05-cv-06073-JCJ Document 4 Filed 12/06/2005 Page 2 of 3

Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 4 Filed 12/06/2005 Page 3 of 3 Case 2:05-cv-06073-JCJ Document 4 Filed 12/06/2005 Page 3 of 3
Subpart 941.2 - Acquiring Utility Services

Parent topic: PART 941 - ACQUISITION OF UTILITY SERVICES

941.201-70 DOE Directives.

Utility services (defined at 48 CFR 41.101) shall be acquired in accordance with 48 CFR part 41 and

the Department of Energy (DOE) Order 430.2B, Departmental Energy, Renewable Energy and

Transportation Management, or its successor.

941.201-71 Use of subcontracts.

Utility services for the furnishing of electricity, gas (natural or manufactured), steam, water and/or

sewerage at facilities owned or leased by DOE shall not be acquired under a subcontract

arrangement, except as provided for at 970.4102-1 or if the prime contract is with a utility company.
### MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04

- 11

- 00140

- CV
Michael BASELUOS and Athena Rasmusson, Appellants

v. George SARRAN , Appellee
From the County Court at Law No. 3 , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 343342 Honorable David J. Rodriguez , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Delivered and Filed: May 4, 2011
DISMISSED Appellants filed a notice of appeal on February 18, 2011. The notice did not state the date of the order or judgment from which appellants sought to appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d)(2). This court queried appellants regarding this omission, and appel lants admitted that no appealable order or judgment had yet been signed, but that one was expected shortly. Time passed, and neither the clerk nor the court reporter filed their respective records. When advised by this court that the records were past du e, both the clerk and the court reporter advised this04

- 11

- 00140

- CV

- 2

- court that no final, appealable order had yet been signed, and the case was ongoing in the trial court. This court again contacted appellants, but they again failed to produce or advise us of the
exist ence of any appealable order. Accordingly, on March 28, 2011, we issued a show cause order to appellants, ordering them to file, on or before April 12, 2011, a response showing cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction becaus e of the absence of any appealable order or judgment. Appellants did not file a response. We therefore dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3(a), (c) (permitting appellate court to dismiss appeal for want of jurisdiction or for appellant’s failure to comply with court order within specified time). We order all costs assessed against appellants.
See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.1(d) (absent agreeme nt of parties, costs are taxed against appellant).

PER CURIAM
#### § 966.45 Contributions.

The committee may accept voluntary contributions but these shall only be used for production research, market research and development and marketing and promotion including paid advertising pursuant to § 966.48. Furthermore, such contributions shall be free from any encumbrances by the donor and the committee shall retain complete control of their use. The committee is prohibited from accepting contributions from handlers subject to the order, or any person whose contributions would constitute a conflict of interest.

[51 FR 30474, Aug. 27, 1986]
628.309-70 DOSAR provisions and clauses.       (a) The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 652.228–70, Defense Base Act—Covered Contractor Employees, in all solicitations for services and construction to be performed outside of the United States.          (b) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 652.228–71, Workers' Compensation Insurance (Defense Base Act)—Services, in solicitations and contracts for services to be performed outside of the United States when there is a reasonable expectation that offers will include covered contractor employees, as defined in 628.305(b). If the contracting officer is unsure as to whether offers will include covered contractor employees, the contracting officer shall insert the clause.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 628.3—Insurance
# Subpart 629.1—General

**Parent topic:**PART 629—TAXES

## 629.101 Resolving tax problems.

In certain instances, acquisitions by posts are exempt from various taxes in foreign countries. Contracting officers shall ascertain such exemptions and take maximum advantage of them.
#### § 986.161 Assessment rate.

On and after October 1, 2021, assessment rates of $0.01 per pound for pecans classified as improved, $0.00 per pound for pecans classified as native and seedling, and $0.00 per pound for pecans classified as substandard pecans are established.

[87 FR 22110, Apr. 14, 2022]
2007-1451.

#### In re A.J.S.

Franklin App. No. 06AP-597, 2007-Ohio-3216.

Lanzinger, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I only.

Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

OWEN J. ROGAL, D.D.S., )

P.C. d/b/a THE PAIN CENTER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 3:06cv711-MHT

) 

SKILSTAF, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that plaintiff show cause, if any there

be, in writing by October 27, 2006, as to why defendant’s

motion to consolidate for discovery purposes only (doc.

no. 28) should not be granted.

DONE, this the 18th day of October, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 31 Filed 10/18/2006 Page 1 of 1