alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Unassociated Document


    
      Joint Filing
Agreement

      


      Pursuant
to Rule 13d-1(k)(1) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, the undersigned agree that the Statement on Schedule 13D/A to which
this exhibit is attached is filed on behalf of each of them in the capacities
set forth below.

      


       

      
        Dated:  February
4, 2010

      

      


      
        	
                ARCH
      DIGITAL HOLDINGS LIMITED

              
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
                B
      y:

              	
                /s/ Clement Kwong

              	 
      
	
                Name:

              	
                Clement
      Kwong

              
	
                Title:

              	
                Director

              
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
                ARC
      CAPITAL HOLDINGS LIMITED

              
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
                By:

              	
                /s/ Allan Liu

              	 
      
	
                Name:

              	
                Allan
      Liu

              
	
                Title:

              	
                Director

              
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
                ARC
      CAPITAL PARTNERS LIMITED

              
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
                By:

              	
                /s/ Allan Liu

              	 
      
	
                Name:

              	
                Allan
      Liu

              
	
                Title:

              	
                Authorized
      Signatory
# Subpart 606.2—Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources

**Parent topic:**PART 606—COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS

## 606.202 Establishing or maintaining alternative sources.

The Procurement Executive is the agency head for the purposes of FAR 6.202.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

OWEN J. ROGAL, D.D.S., )

P.C., )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 3:06cv711-MHT

) 

SKILSTAF, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion for leave to reply

(Doc. No. 71) is granted.

DONE, this the 22nd day of August, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 73 Filed 08/22/2007 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) 1:06-CR-000185-DRB

)

BOBBY R. HARDRICK, II )

ORDER

Pursuant to Defendant’s Notice of Intent to Change Plea (Doc. 10, filed October 5,

2006), it is

ORDERED that this case is hereby set for a change of plea hearing at 10:00 a.m.

on November 7, 2006, in the Magistrate Judge Courtroom at Ft. Rucker, Alabama. 

Done this 12 day of October, 2006. th

/s/ Delores R. Boyd

DELORES R. BOYD 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cr-00185-CSC Document 11 Filed 10/12/2006 Page 1 of 1
1313.305-1 General.       (a) *Third-party drafts.* Third-party drafts are not authorized for use by Department of Commerce agencies.          (b) *Imprest Funds.* The *Imprest Fund Policy Directive,* issued November 9, 1999, by the Department of Treasury, required that all Federal agencies eliminate agency use of imprest funds by October 1, 2001, except where provided under the *Imprest Fund Policy Directive.* Requests for exceptions to the requirements of the Imprest Fund Policy Directive should be addressed to DOC's Director of Financial Management. In the case of an approved exception, DOC's procedures for using imprest funds can be found in the Cash Management Policies and Procedures Handbook, available at the Department of Commerce, Office of Financial Management Web site. A copy of all approved exceptions shall be submitted to the Senior Bureau Procurement Official.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1313.3 - Simplified Acquisitions Methods
Subpart 1622.1—Basic Labor Policies

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 8913; 40 U.S.C. 486(c); 48 CFR 1.301.

Parent topic: PART 1622—APPLICATION OF LABOR LAWS TO GOVERNMENT ACQUISITIONS

1622.103-70 Contract clause.

The clause at 1652.222–70 shall be inserted in all FEHBP contracts.
****Bulletin No. 99-07, Supplement 1****
****OMB Home****

October 21, 1999

BULLETIN NO. 99-07, Supplement No. 1

TO THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND ESTABLISHMENTS

SUBJECT:  Apportionment Under the Extension of the Continuing Resolution for Fiscal Year 2000

1. **Purpose and background**.  H. J. Res. 71 extends the continuing resolution through October 29, 1999.   

2. **Apportionment**.  I am extending the automatic apportionment specified in section 2 of OMB Bulletin No. 99-07 to October 29, 1999.  The portion of the year covered is now 7.9 percent.

The continuing resolution extension includes a provision clarifying the authority of agencies to both do the work necessary to issue mandatory payments due on or about November 1st and to make the payments.

If you can justify amounts greater than the amount automatically apportioned, please submit a written request for apportionment.

**Jacob J. Lew***Director*
Privacy Statement
The BudgetLegislative InformationManagement Reform/GPRAGrants ManagementFinancial ManagementProcurement PolicyInformation & Regulatory Policy

Help

T H E   W H I T E   H O U S E
Exhibit 15





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





The Board of Directors


RRsat Global Communications Network Ltd.:





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No. 333-140936) on Form S-8 of RRsat Global Communications Network Ltd. (the "Company") of our report dated March 17, 2010 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2008 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders' equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, which report appears in the December 31, 2009 Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company.





Somekh Chaikin


Certified Public Accountants (Israel)


Member Firm of KPMG International




Tel-Aviv, Israel


March 17, 2010
u"-ä*n

LYJ

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC 27711

t{AR I 5 2007

Mr. Michel Moser

Plant Manager

Flolcim (US), Inc.

I 800 Dove Lane

Midlothian, Texas 76065

Dear Mr. Moser:

OFFICE OF

AIR QUALITY PLANNING

AND STANDARDS

As you are aware, the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) promulgated

amendments to the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for the Portland

Cement Manufacturing Industry on December 20, 2006. See 7l FR 76518. These regulatiorrs

contained new source standards for mercury based on the performance of a wet scrubber.

However, due to the uncertainties concerning the level of scrubber performance in controlling

mercury, we also at the same time published a notice of reconsideration for this new source

mercury standard. See 7l FR 76553.

As part of the reconsideration process, EPA has undertaken a program to acquire

additional information related to emissions of mercury from cement kilns with wet scrubbers

Th'is letter is to confinn that your facility has agreed to perforrn simultaneous mercury testing at

the inlet and outlet of your wet scrubber. As part of this effort, we will require pretest

submission of a testing protocol for EPA approval. EPA will prornptly review and respond to

the draft protocol(s) as they are received. It is also our understanding that you anticipate

submitting the test data to EPA by June 30, 2007. Therefore, these protocols need to be

submitted in a timely manner for rcview and approval to allow the June 30,2007, schedule to be

met. Your cooperation in meeting this schedule is appreciated, and will avoid the need to require

the testing through more formal means.

If any of the information in this letter is incoruect, please notify us within ten ( I 0) days

from the receipt of this letter.

lntemet Address (URL) o htþ:/1rww.epa.gov

Recyoled/Rocyclable.Prlnted wllh Vegetable OllBased lnks on Recycþd Paper (Mlnlmum 25% Posloonsumor)
2

Thank you for your assistance in this effort. '

. Seetor Policiçs and Programs Division

cc: Catryn Wilson,Interim Environmental Manager, Holcim (US), Inc., Midlothian, TX

Meg Garakani, Holcim (US), trnc., Waltham, MA
#### In re KALISKY.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 19, 1914.)

In the matter of Abraham Kalisky.

No opinion. Referred to official referee. Settle order on notice. See, also, 148 N. Y. Supp. 1124.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             666
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2044
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      22859
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                             502
<DEPRECIATION>                                     388
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   31306
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                          17745
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            29
<OTHER-SE>                                        7248
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     31306
<SALES>                                          16198
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 16346
<CGS>                                            14196
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    16097
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    249
<INCOME-TAX>                                       106
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                143
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       143
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
<FN>
<F1>the Company does not present a classified balance sheet
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                      19,948,438
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,156,583
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,587,818
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     568,765
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,156,583
<SALES>                                        614,349
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               694,085
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  363,493
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               175,328
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              78,229
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 77,035
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             77,035
<DISCONTINUED>                              11,103,411
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (382,458)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                10,797,988
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   190.78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   190.78
        

</TABLE>
#### Thomas M. HOWZE et al., Plaintiffs, v. Dale HARTMAN et al., Defendants.

No. CIV-2-79-108.

United States District Court, E. D. Tennessee, Northeastern Division.

May 5, 1980.

Mark D. Slagle, Johnson City, Tenn., for plaintiffs.

Eric D. Christiansen, Greeneville, Tenn., N. R. Coleman, Jr., Greeneville, Tenn., and Jack D. Hodges, Johnson City, Tenn., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

NEESE, District Judge.

The undersigned judge has considered *de novo*those portions of the recommendation of a magistrate herein of April 9, 1980 to which timely written objection was made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The question of the state of the citizenship of the plaintiff Mr. Thomas M. Howze is a close one. He, on June 28,1979, had strong ties with the state of Tennessee as well as with the state of Florida.

Three significant factors, however, tip the scales in favor of his citizenship in Florida: First, it is presumed that Mr. Howze was domiciled in Florida where his wife and family resided. *Broadstone Realty Corp. v. Evans*(D.C.N.Y.1962), 213 F.Supp. 261, 265[4], affirmed (C.A.2d 1966), 367 F.2d 397; *Messick v. Southern Pennsylvania Bus Co.*(D.C.Pa.1945), 59 F.Supp. 799, 800[7], Secondly, the fact that he votes in Florida (when he votes) raises a presumption of citizenship in that state. *Griffin v. Matthews*(D.C.N.C.1969), 310 F.Supp. 341, 343[7], affirmed (C.A.4th 1970), 423 F.2d 272; *Jardine v. Interhar*(D.C.W.Va.1963), 213 F.Supp. 598, 600[4]. And thirdly, Mr. Howze’s established domicile in Florida continued until and unless it was demonstrated

*14that he acquired a new one.*
      *Kaiser v. Loomis*(C.A.6th 1968), 391 F.2d 1007, 1009; *Campbell v. Oliva*(D.C.Tenn.1968), 295 F.Supp. 616, 618[3], reversed on other grounds (C.A.6th 1970), 424 F.2d 1244.

Having considered the record herein as a whole, the Court hereby FINDS that on June 28, 1979 the plaintiff Mr. Thomas M. Howze did not have the intention of remaining in the state of Tennessee permanently or indefinitely despite his possible residency in such state. Accordingly, on such crucial date, Mr. Howze was domiciled in Florida, and hence, he was a citizen of Florida. *See Stifel*v. *Hopkins*(C.A.6th 1973), 477 F.2d 1116, 1120[2],

The recommendation of the magistrate hereby is

ACCEPTED, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and the motion of the defendants for a dismissal of this action for lack of the Court’s jurisdiction of the subject matter hereby is

DENIED.

The burden was on the movants to have proved that the domicile of Mr. Howze in Florida changed. *Kaiser v. Loomis, supra,*391 F.2d at 1010.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>       DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>            SEP-30-1997

<CASH>                          19,182,196 
<SECURITIES>                          0    
<RECEIVABLES>                      229,134 
<ALLOWANCES>                          0    
<INVENTORY>                           0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                19,411,330 
<PP&E>                           9,499,479 
<DEPRECIATION>                        0    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  28,954,620 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              211,063 
<BONDS>                               0    
<COMMON>                              0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0    
<PREFERRED>                           0    
<OTHER-SE>                      25,195,101 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    28,954,620 
<SALES>                          1,222,288 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 2,572,523 
<CGS>                                 0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      417,508 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   322,469 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    0    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  1,832,546 
<INCOME-TAX>                          0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              1,510,392 
<DISCONTINUED>                        0    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0    
<CHANGES>                             0    
<NET-INCOME>                     1,510,392 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        22.06 
<EPS-DILUTED>                        22.06 

        


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, January 18, 2011.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Marisa Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3557.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Tuesday, January 18, 2011, at 10 a.m. Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Marisa Knispel. For more information, please contact Ms. Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3557, or write TAP Office, 10 MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or contact us at the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: December 3, 2010.

Shawn F. Collins,

Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2010-30890 Filed 12-7-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Centenary International Corporation
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carlos
      Fabian De Sousa, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)  the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Carlos Fabian De SousaCarlos
                Fabian De SousaChief
                Financial OfficerAugust
                6, 2008





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing
      certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q solely pursuant to
      section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and are not being
      filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure
      document.