alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
** **

United States

Securities and ExchangeCommission

Washington, D.C.  20549

 

Form 10-Q

 

(MarkOne)

[X]   Quarterly Report PURSUANT TO Section 13 or15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010

 

or

 

[]   Transition Report PURSUANTTO Section 13 or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934

 

For the transition period from _________to _________

 

Commission file number 0-14554

 

 

NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS8 

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

55 Beattie Place, P.O. Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina  29602

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(864) 239-1000

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to befiled by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during thepreceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was requiredto file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements forthe past 90 days.  

[X]Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted onits corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to besubmitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of thischapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that theregistrant was required to submit and post such files). [ ] Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, anaccelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reportingcompany.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “acceleratedfiler” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act). [ ] Yes  [X] No
```

[109th Congress Public Law 306]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ306.109]

[[Page 120 STAT. 1777]]

Public Law 109-306
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
    To amend the John F. Kennedy Center Act to authorize additional 
 appropriations for the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts 
      for fiscal year 2007. <<NOTE: Oct. 6, 2006 -  [H.R. 5187]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JOHN F. KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS.

    (a) Maintenance, Repair, and Security.--Section 13(a) of the John F. 
Kennedy Center Act (20 U.S.C. 76r(a)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1) by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (2) by striking ``, 2006, and 2007.'' and 
        inserting ``and 2006; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) $19,100,000 for fiscal year 2007.''.

    (b) Capital Projects.--Section 13(b) of such Act (20 U.S.C. 76r(b)) 
is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1) by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (2) by striking ``, 2006, and 2007.'' and 
        inserting ``and 2006; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2007.''.

    Approved October 6, 2006.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5187:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 109-514 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):
            July 25, considered and passed House.
            Sept. 26, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
3406.501 Requirement.

The Competition Advocate for the Department is the Deputy Director, Contracts and Acquisitions

Management.

Parent topic: Subpart 3406.5—Advocates for Competition
#### § 930.6 District.

*District* means one of the subdivisions of the production area described in § 930.20(c), or such other subdivisions as may be established pursuant to § 930.21, or any subdivision added pursuant to § 930.52.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 18, 2019

a1015

Order 

Clerk

October 18, 2019

159323

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 159323

COA: 339953

FUAD FAROUK SHEENA, Oakland CC: 2011-237051-FC

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 24, 2019 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

BERNSTEIN, J. (dissenting).

I respectfully dissent. I would have granted defendant’s application for leave to 

appeal to determine whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to pursue an insanity 

defense. Two doctors performed psychological evaluations of defendant and concluded 

that defendant was not legally insane. But the doctors disagreed about whether the 

defendant had a “mental illness,” and even the doctor who concluded defendant did not 

was equivocal. Further, both the doctors recognized that defendant had significant 

mental health issues and sometimes could not understand the consequences of his actions. 

Under Michigan’s statute governing the insanity defense, a defendant is 

considered legally insane if, “as a result of mental illness,” he “lacks substantial capacity 

either to appreciate the nature and quality or the wrongfulness of his . . . conduct or to 

conform his . . . conduct to the requirements of the law.” MCL 768.21a(1). In my view, 

the doctors’ conclusions regarding legal insanity were contrary to the plain language of 

MCL 768.21a(1), and defendant presents a reasonable argument that despite these 

conclusions, trial counsel should have further investigated whether an insanity defense 

should have been presented.

MCCORMACK, C.J. and CAVANAGH, J., join the statement of BERNSTEIN, J.
|                           |
|---------------------------|
|                           |
| **Current         Issue** |
#### § 984.8 Walnuts.

*Walnuts* means only walnuts of the “English” (Juglans regia) varieties grown in California.

[41 FR 31542, July 29, 1976]
§ 990.40 General adverse action appeal process. ( a ) Persons who believe they are adversely affected by the denial of a license application under the USDA hemp production program may appeal such decision to the AMS Administrator.
( b ) Persons who believe they are adversely affected by the denial of a license renewal under the USDA hemp production program may appeal such decision to the AMS Administrator.
( c ) Persons who believe they are adversely affected by the revocation or suspension of a USDA hemp production license may appeal such decision to the AMS Administrator.
( d ) States and Indian Tribes that believe they are adversely affected by the denial of a proposed State or Tribal hemp plan may appeal such decision to the AMS Administrator.
5111.703 Contract Clauses    (c)(i)  Insert the provision at AFARS 5152.211-9000, Evaluation of Subline Items, in solicitations when a fixed-price construction contract is contemplated and the clause at AFARS 5152.211-9001 is included in the solicitation.       (ii)  In addition to the clause at FAR 52.211-18, insert the clause at AFARS 5152.211-9001, Variations in Estimated Quantities—Subline Items, in solicitations and contracts when—       (A)  A fixed-price construction contract is contemplated that authorizes a variation in the estimated quantity of unit-priced items; and       (B)  Those unit priced items will be subdivided into subline items and separately priced for payment purposes. **Parent topic:** Subpart 5111.7 - Variation in Quantity
The Honorable Edward L. Filippine, United States District Judge for the Eastern 1

District of Missouri. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-1282

___________

Michael J. Landy, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

* Appeal from the United States

Lisa Colleen Mangogna; Thomas * District Court for the

Mangogna; Barbara Mangogna; * Eastern District of Missouri.

Father Quirk; Associated Catholic *

Charities of the Archdiocese of St. * [UNPUBLISHED]

Louis; Associated Catholic Charities *

of the Archdiocese of Washington, *

D.C., *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: March 5, 1998

 Filed: March 19, 1998

___________

Before FAGG, BEAM, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

In this diversity action alleging fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud, Michael

J. Landy appeals the district court&s orders dismissing without prejudice his second 1
-2-

amended complaint, denying his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) motion, and

denying him leave to file a third amended complaint. After carefully reviewing the

record and the parties& submissions, we affirm the judgment of the district court for the

reasons set forth in its memoranda and orders. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 (the
Report) of The Peoples BancTrust Company, Inc. (the Company), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby each certify that
to the best of our knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered
in the Report.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|                                                     
|/s/ Don J. Giardina                                  
|Don J. Giardina President and Chief Executive
Officer



|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                     
|                                                                     
|/s/ Thomas P. Wilbourne                                              
|Thomas P. Wilbourne Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer

May 09, 2007

(Date)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The information furnished herein shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor
shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.
#### BOND, Respondent, v. WALKER, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 26, 1914.)

Action by Josephine L. Bond against Frederick H. Walker, *1107as executor, etc., of Alva S. Walker, deceased.

No opinion. Order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

			 		

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350) 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Sibanye Gold Limited (the “Company”) for the period ended 31 December 2017  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Neal Froneman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

|  | 1 |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|---|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2 |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--|---|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Date: 30 March 2018 

|                    |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |   |
| /s/ Neal Froneman       |   |
| Neal Froneman           |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - [Report No. 2922]

A Petition for Reconsideration has been filed in the Commission's Rulemaking proceeding listed in this Public Notice and published pursuant to 47 CFR 1.429(e). The full text of this document is available for viewing and copying in Room CY-B402, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC or may be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI) (1-800-378-3160). Oppositions to this petition must be filed by December 29, 2010. See Section 1.4(b)(1) of the Commission's rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition must be filed within 10 days after the time for filing oppositions has expired.

*Subject:*                     In the Matter Amendment of Section 73.202(b), Table of Allotments FM Broadcast Stations (Markham, Ganado and Victoria, Texas) (MB Docket No. 07-163).                

*Number of Petitions Filed:*                     1.                

Marlene H. Dortch,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-31352 Filed 12-13-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
FINANCING STATEMENT                                     Identifying File No.____

ALL INFORMATION MUST BE TYPEWRITTEN OR PRINTED IN INK. 
                                                      SIGNATURES MUST BE IN INK.

If transaction or transactions wholly or partially subject to 
recordation tax indicate amount of taxable debt here. $__________ .

This  financing  statement  dated  6/10/97 is presented to a filing  officer for
filing pursuant to Uniform Commercial Code.

1.   DEBTOR

     Name              Bundy American Corporation
         ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
     Address    11460 Cronridge Drive, Suite 120, Owings Mills, Maryland  21117
              -----------------------------------------------------------------

2.   SECURED PARTY

     Name              The Chase Manhattan Bank
         ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
     Address           200 Jericho Quadrangle, Jericho, NY   11753
             ------------------------------------------------------------------
             Person and Address to whom Statement is to be Returned if Different
             from above.

3.   Maturity date of obligation (if any)      5/31/2002
                                         --------------------------------------
4.   This financing statement covers the following types (or items) of property:
     (List)

     All present and future accounts, contract rights,  instruments,  documents,
     and chattel paper, all returned and repossessed goods relating thereto, all
     proceeds thereof,  and all books,  records,  and other property relating to
     any of the foregoing.



                         CHECK |X| THE LINES WHICH APPLY

5.   |_| (If collateral is crops)  The above described crops are growing or  are
         to be grown on: (describe estate)


     |_| (If collateral is goods which are or are to  become fixtures) The above
         described goods are affixed or to be affixed to: (describe real estate)

     |_| (Proceeds of collateral are also covered)

     |_| (Products of collateral are also covered)


/s/Kenneth L. Blum,Jr. - President
--------------------------------------
(Signature of Debtor)

    Bundy American Corporation
--------------------------------------
Type of Print Above Name on Above Line

                                               Signature Illegible - VP   
--------------------------------------       -----------------------------------
(Signature of Debtor)                           (Signature of Secured Party)


                                                The Chase Manhattan Bank
--------------------------------------       -----------------------------------
Type or Print Above Signature on Above Line     Type or Print Above Signature on
                                                Above Line
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 3 381

_____________________________ C HRISTOPHER D EMETRIUS S IMPKINS J R , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. John L. Miller , Judge

. May 21, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
M AKAR , O STERHAUS , and B ILBREY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)





In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Report”) of Harvest Capital Credit Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Richard P. Buckanavage, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





/s/ Richard P. BuckanavageName:Richard P. BuckanavageDate:March 16, 2015
# SUBCHAPTER C—CONTRACTING METHODS AND CONTRACT TYPES    

- PART 1614—SEALED BIDDING 
- PART 1615—CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION 
- PART 1616—TYPES OF CONTRACTS 

- PART 1614—SEALED BIDDING    - 1614.000   Applicability.
- PART 1615—CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION     - 1615.070   Negotiation authority.
  - Subpart 1615.1—Source Selection Processes and Techniques     - 1615.170   Applicability.
  - Subpart 1615.2—Solicitations and Receipt of Proposals and Information     - 1615.270   Applicability.
  - Subpart 1615.3—Source Selection     - 1615.370   Applicability.
  - Subpart 1615.4—Contract Pricing     - 1615.402   Pricing policy.
    - 1615.404-4   Profit.
    - 1615.404-70   Profit analysis factors.
    - 1615.406-2   Certificates of accurate cost or pricing data for community rated carriers.
    - 1615.407-1   Rate reduction for defective pricing or defective cost or pricing data.
    - 1615.470   Carrier investment of FEHB funds.
    - 1615.470-1   Investment income clause.
  - Subparts 1615.8–1615.9 [Reserved]
  - Subpart 1615.70—Audit and Records—Negotiation     - 1615.7001   Audit and records.
- PART 1616—TYPES OF CONTRACTS     - Subpart 1616.1—Selecting Contract Types     - 1616.102   Policies.
    - 1616.105   Solicitation provision.
  - Subpart 1616.70—Negotiated Benefits Contracts     - 1616.7001   Clause—contracts based on a combination of cost and price analysis (community rated).
    - 1616.7002   Clause—contracts based on cost analysis (experience rated).
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Elbert F. Ross, Appellant

— Motion granted and order of this court [33 A D 2d 659] entered October 23, 1969 amended to state that certain constitutional questions were presented and passed upon. Present — Goldman, P. J., Del Vecchio, Witmer, Gabrielli and Bastow, JJ.