alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# SUBCHAPTER A - GENERAL

- PART 1500 [RESERVED] 
- PART 1501 - GENERAL 
- PART 1502 - DEFINITION OF WORDS AND TERMS 
- PART 1503 - IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST 
- PART 1504 - ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS 

- PART 1500 [RESERVED]   
- PART 1501 - GENERAL    - 1501.000   Scope of part.
  - Subpart 1501.1 - Purpose, Authority, Issuance     - 1501.101   Purpose.
    - 1501.104   Applicability.
    - 1501.105   Issuance.
    - 1501.105-1   Publication and code arrangement.
    - 1501.105-2   Arrangement of regulations.
    - 1501.105-3   Copies.
  - Subpart 1501.3 - Agency Acquisition Regulations     - 1501.301   Policy.
    - 1501.370   OMB approvals under the Paperwork Reduction Act.
  - Subpart 1501.4 - Deviations     - 1501.401   Definition.
    - 1501.403   Individual deviations.
    - 1501.404   Class deviations.
  - Subpart 1501.6 - Contracting Authority and Responsibilities     - 1501.602-3   Ratification of unauthorized commitments.
    - 1501.603   Selection, appointment, and termination of appointment.
    - 1501.603-1   General.
- PART 1502 - DEFINITION OF WORDS AND TERMS    - Subpart 1502.1 - Definitions     - 1502.100   Definitions.
- PART 1503 - IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST    - 1503.000   Scope of part.
  - Subpart 1503.1 - Safeguards     - 1503.101-370   Financial conflicts of interest and loss of impartiality.
    - 1503.104-4   Disclosure, protection, and marking of contractor bid or proposal information and source selection information.
  - Subpart 1503.6 - Contracts With Government Employees or Organizations Owned or Controlled by Them     - 1503.600-70   Scope of subpart.
    - 1503.600-71   Definitions.
    - 1503.601   Policy.
    - 1503.602   Exceptions.
    - 1503.670   Disclosure provision.
  - Subpart 1503.9 - Whistleblower Protections for Contractor Employees     - 1503.905   Procedures for investigating complaints.
  - Subpart 1503.10 - Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct     - 1503.1002   Policy.
    - 1503.1003   Requirements.
    - 1503.1004   Contract clause.
    - 1503.1070   Scientific integrity.
    - 1503.1071   Contract clause.
- PART 1504 - ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS    - Subpart 1504.6 - Contract Reporting     - 1504.670   [Reserved]
  - Subpart 1504.8 - Contract Files     - 1504.804   Closeout of contract files.
    - 1504.804-5   Detailed procedures for closing out contract files.
1601.301 Policy.       (a) Procedures, contract clauses, and other aspects of the acquisition process for contracts in the FEHBP shall be consistent with the principles of the FAR. Changes to the FAR that are otherwise authorized by statute or applicable regulation, dictated by the practical realities associated with the unique nature of health care procurements, or necessary to satisfy specific needs of the Office of Personnel Management shall be implemented as amendments to the FEHBAR and published in the Federal Register, or as deviations to the FAR in accordance with FAR subpart 1.4.          (b) Internal procedures, instructions, and guides that are necessary to clarify or implement the FEHBAR *within* OPM may be issued by agency officials specifically designated by the Director, OPM. Normally, such designations will be specified in the OPM Administrative Manual, which is routinely available to agency employees and will be made available to interested outside parties upon request. Clarifying or implementing procedures, instructions, and guides issued pursuant to this section of the FEHBAR must—          (1) Be consistent with the policies and procedures contained in this regulation as implemented and supplemented from time to time; and          (2) Follow the format, arrangement, and numbering system of this regulation to the extent practicable.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1601.3—Agency Acquisition Regulation (FEHBAR)
#### § 915.67 Duration of immunities.

The benefits, privileges, and immunities conferred upon any person by virtue of this part shall cease upon its termination, except with respect to acts done under and during the existence of this part.
###### Editorial Note on Part 100

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 100 appear at 81 FR 86910, Dec. 2, 2016.

#### § 100.2 Scope.

The siting requirements contained in this part apply to applications for site approval for the purpose of constructing and operating stationary power and testing reactors pursuant to the provisions of part 50 or part 52 of this chapter.

[61 FR 65175, Dec. 11, 1996]
410.002 Procedures.       Market research must include obtaining information on the commercial quality assurance practices as an alternative for Government inspection and testing prior to tender for acceptance.    **Parent topic:** PART 410 - MARKET RESEARCH
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Barrow Shaver Resources Company

, LLC, Kathryn M. Dawson, and Michael Ray Hill, Appellant s

No. 06

- 19

- 00105

- CV v.

NETX Acquisitions, LLC

, and Thomas C. Merritt, Trustee, Appellee s Appeal from the 5th District Court of Cass County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 19C090 ).

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Burgess and Justice Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed

for want of jurisdiction . Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We further order that the appellant s , Barrow Shaver Resources Company

, LLC, Kathryn

M. Dawson, and Michae l Ray Hill, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED JANUARY 29, 2020

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Exhibit
4.24


 


List
of Subsidiaries


 


		1.	Intec
                                         Pharma Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware.



 






144
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Raymond A. Pepitone, Appellant. Philip Ross, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 25, 1979, which modified a decision of the Administrative Law Judge disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits because of misconduct, and found the claimant disqualified because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. The original notice to claimant indicated a hearing was to be held to determine whether claimant lost his employment because of misconduct. The ultimate determination found claimant lost his employment because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Accordingly, claimant was deprived of the opportunity to prepare a defense because of lack of adequate notice of the purpose of the hearing *(Matter of Lynch [Ross],*67 AD2d 1046). Decision reversed, with costs, and matter remitted to the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. Greenblott, J. P., Sweeney, Kane, Main and Mikoll, JJ., concur.
2930.201-5 Waiver.

(a) The HCA is authorized to waive CAS requirements as provided in FAR 30.201-5.

(b) Requests for waivers under paragraph (a) of this subsection must be prepared by the contracting

officer as prescribed in FAR 30.201-5(e) and submitted to the HCA.

Parent topic: Subpart 2930.2 - CAS Program Requirements
img72182635_0.jpg

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

RE: PF4 – SEQUOIA 2012-6

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as Servicer, pursuant to the Agreement, does hereby certify that:

(1) A review of the activities of the Servicer between May 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023 and of the performance of the Servicer under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and


(2) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review for purposes of Regulation AB, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such year, except as otherwise provided in the Servicer’sapplicable Form 1122 filing.


JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Date: 2/28/2024

By:/s/ Michelle Silwonuk

Name: Michelle Silwonuk

Title: Managing Director






---
1629.402 Foreign contracts.       The clause set forth in section 1652.229–70 shall be inserted in all FEHBP contracts performed outside the United States, its possessions, and Puerto Rico.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1629.4—Contract Clauses
713.106-370 Partner vetting.       If an acquisition is identified as subject to vetting, see (48 CFR) AIDAR 704.70 for the applicable procedures and requirements.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 713.1—Procedures.
1622.103-70 Contract clause.

The clause at 1652.222–70 shall be inserted in all FEHBP contracts.

Parent topic: Subpart 1622.1—Basic Labor Policies
1028.311-2 Agency solicitation provisions and contract clauses.       Insert a clause substantially similar to 1052.228-70, Insurance requirements, in all solicitations and contracts that contain the clause at FAR 52.228-7.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1028.3 - Insurance
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

DONNA L. EARLY, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

vs. ) CASE NO.: 2:06cv727 

 ) 

RHEEM MANUFACTURING ) 

COMPANY, a corporation and CAL ) 

MEARS, an individual, ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

 COME NOW the Defendants Rheem Manufacturing Company (hereinafter “Rheem”) 

and Cal Mears (hereinafter “Mears”) and respectfully move the Court for a two-week extension 

of the current deadline to respond to the Complaint filed in this Court on August 13, 2006, by 

Donna L. Early. In support of its motion, Defendants show the following: 

1. Plaintiff Early filed her Complaint against Defendants Rheem and Mears on or 

about August 13, 2006. 

2. Defendants’ responses to the Complaint would otherwise be due on Thursday, 

September 14, 2006. 

3. Rheem is currently moving its corporate headquarters from New York, New York 

to Atlanta, Georgia and, as a result, the undersigned counsel will not have reliable access to 

Barbara Ann Cook, Esq., Rheem’s Assistant General Counsel, who is well familiar with the 

complicated factual background of this case and who will take an active role in Rheem’s defense. 

4. A two-week extension will enable Ms. Cook to move her files and records to 

Atlanta and to actively participate in the preparation of Defendants’ responses to the Complaint. 

Case 2:06-cv-00727-WKW-CSC Document 5 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 1 of 3
5. The undersigned has conferred with Plaintiff’s counsel, Trina S. Williams, Esq., 

who states that Plaintiff has no objection to the requested extension. 

WHEREFORE THE PREMISES CONSIDERED, Defendants Rheem and Mears 

respectfully request the Court to grant an extension of the deadline to file their responses to the

Complaint to and including September 28, 2006. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

s/Henry C. Barnett, Jr. 

HENRY C. BARNETT, JR. (BAR037) 

ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS 

OF COUNSEL: 

CAPELL & HOWARD, P. C. 

150 South Perry Street 

Post Office Box 2069 

Montgomery, Alabama 36104 

(334) 241-8000 

(334) 323-8888 

2

Case 2:06-cv-00727-WKW-CSC Document 5 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 7th day of September 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing 

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing 

to the following: 

Trina S. Williams 

Vicky U. Toles 

TOLES & WILLIAMS, LLP 

1015 South McDonough Street 

Montgomery, Alabama 36104 

s/Henry C. Barnett, Jr. 

OF COUNSEL 

Case 2:06-cv-00727-WKW-CSC Document 5 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 3 of 3
§ 1010.203 Procedures for review and approval of requests. ( a ) Any former employee of the executive branch subject to the constraints of the post-employment restrictions of 18 U.S.C. 207(a), (c), and (d) who wishes to communicate scientific or technological information to DOE must contact the DOE office with which the former employee wishes to communicate and request authorization to make such communication. This request must be in writing and address, in detail, information regarding each of the factors set forth in paragraphs (c)(1) through (c)(6) and (c)(8) of this section.
( b ) In consultation with the Designated Agency Ethics Official (DAEO), the agency designee in the office with cognizance over the matter must advise the former employee in writing whether the proposed communication is an authorized communication. This authority cannot be delegated, except to another individual serving in a position in DOE requiring appointment by the President of the United States with the advice and consent of the Senate.
( c ) In deciding whether a proposed communication is an authorized communication, the agency designee receiving the request and the DAEO must consider the following factors: ( 1 ) Whether the former employee has relevant scientific or technical qualifications;
( 2 ) Whether the former employee has qualifications that are otherwise unavailable to both the former employee's current employer and DOE;
( 3 ) The nature of the scientific or technological information to be conveyed;
( 4 ) The former employee's position prior to termination;
( 5 ) The extent of the former employee's involvement in the matter at issue during his or her employment, including: ( i ) The former employee's involvement in the same particular matter involving specific parties;
( ii ) The time elapsed since the former employee's participation in such matter; and
( iii ) The offices within the Federal department or agency involved in the matter both during the former employee's period of employment in the executive branch and at the time the request is being made;
( 6 ) The existence of pending or anticipated matters before the Federal government from which the former employee or his or her current employer may financially benefit, including contract modifications, grant applications, and proposals; and
( 7 ) Whether DOE's interests would be served by allowing the proposed communication; and
( 8 ) Any other relevant information.
Case 3:06-cr-00207-WKW-CSC Document 39 Filed 07/05/07 Page 1 of 7
Case 3:06-cr-00207-WKW-CSC Document 39 Filed 07/05/07 Page 2 of 7
Case 3:06-cr-00207-WKW-CSC Document 39 Filed 07/05/07 Page 3 of 7
Case 3:06-cr-00207-WKW-CSC Document 39 Filed 07/05/07 Page 4 of 7
Case 3:06-cr-00207-WKW-CSC Document 39 Filed 07/05/07 Page 5 of 7
Case 3:06-cr-00207-WKW-CSC Document 39 Filed 07/05/07 Page 6 of 7
Case 3:06-cr-00207-WKW-CSC Document 39 Filed 07/05/07 Page 7 of 7
PART 747—TRANSPORTATION

Authority: Sec. 621, Pub. L. 98–195, 75 Stat. 445 (22 U.S.C. 2381), as amended; E.O. 12163, Sept.

29, 1979, 44 FR 56673; 3 CFR 1979 Comp., p. 435.

Subpart 747.5—Ocean Transportation by U.S.-Flag Vessels

747.507 Contract clauses.

Parent topic: SUBCHAPTER G—CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

Subpart 747.5—Ocean Transportation by U.S.-Flag Vessels

747.507 Contract clauses.

Contracting officer must insert the clause at 752.247–70 in solicitations and contracts solely for

ocean transportation services, and in solicitations and contracts for goods and ocean transportation

services when the ocean transportation will be fixed at the time the contract is awarded. Contracting

officer must use (48 CFR) FAR 52.247–64 as prescribed in (48 CFR) FAR 47.507(a) in other

situations.
SUBCHAPTER C—CONTRACTING METHODS

AND CONTRACT TYPES

PART 613—SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES

PART 614—SEALED BIDDING

PART 615—CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION

PART 616—TYPES OF CONTRACTS

PART 617—SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS

PART 613—SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES

Subpart 613.2—Actions At or Below the Micro-Purchase Threshold

613.201 General.

Subpart 613.3—Simplified Acquisition Methods

613.302 Purchase orders.

613.302-1 General.

613.302-5 Clauses.

613.302-5-70 DOSAR clauses.

613.303 Blanket purchase agreements (BPAs).

613.303-1 General.

613.303-5 Purchases under BPAs.

613.303-6 Review procedures.

613.305 Imprest funds and third party drafts.

613.305-3 Conditions for use.

613.307 Forms.

613.307-70 File folders for purchase orders, delivery orders, blanket purchase

agreements, and purchase card transactions.

PART 614—SEALED BIDDING

Subpart 614.2—Solicitation of Bids

614.201 Preparation of Invitation for Bids (IFB).

614.201-70 Use of English language.

Subpart 614.4—Opening of Bids and Award of Contract

614.402 Opening of bids.

614.402-1 Unclassified bids.

614.402-70 Waiver of public opening of bids.

614.404 Rejection of bids.

614.404-1 Cancellation of invitations after opening.

614.407 Mistakes in bids.

614.407-3 Other mistakes disclosed before award.

614.407-4 Mistakes after award.

PART 615—CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION

Subpart 615.2—Solicitation and Receipt of Proposals and Information

615.204 Contract format.

615.205 Issuing solicitations.

615.205-70 Use of English language.

615.209-70 Examination of records.

Subpart 615.3—Source Selection

615.303 Responsibilities.

Subpart 615.4—Contract Pricing
615.404 Proposal analysis.

615.404-4 Profit.

Subpart 615.6—Unsolicited Proposals

615.604 Agency points of contact.

PART 616—TYPES OF CONTRACTS

616.000 Scope of part.

Subpart 616.1—Selecting Contract Types

616.102 Policies.

616.102-70 Overseas posts.

616.103 Negotiating contract type.

Subpart 616.2—Fixed-Price Contracts

616.203 Fixed-Price contracts with economic price adjustment.

616.203-4 Contract clauses.

616.207 Firm-fixed-price, level-of-effort term contracts.

616.207-3 Limitations.

Subpart 616.5—Indefinite-Delivery Contracts

616.504 Indefinite-quantity contracts.

616.505 Ordering.

616.506 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.

616.506-70 DOSAR contract clause.

PART 617—SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS

Subpart 617.1—Multiyear Contracting

617.104 General.

617.105 Policy.

617.105-1 Uses.

617.108 Congressional notification.

Subpart 617.2—Options

617.204 Contracts.

Subpart 617.5—Interagency Acquisitions Under the Economy Act

617.503 Determination and findings requirements.

617.504-70 Ordering procedures.

Subpart 617.6—Management and Operating Contracts

617.602 Policy.
#### § 1021.103 Adoption of CEQ NEPA regulations.

DOE adopts the regulations for implementing NEPA published by CEQ at 40 CFR parts 1500 through 1508.
# Subpart 314.1 - Use of Sealed Bidding

**Parent topic:**PART 314 - SEALED BIDDING

## 314.103 Policy.

Electronic and information technology (EIT) supplies and services acquired using sealed-bid procedures shall comply with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended. See part 339.
§ 1013.14 Separation of functions. ( a ) The investigating official, the reviewing official, and any employee or agent of the authority who takes part in investigating, preparing, or presenting a particular case may not, in such case or a factually related case— ( 1 ) Participate in the hearing as the ALJ;
( 2 ) Participate or advise in the initial decision or the review of the initial decision by the authority head, except as a witness or a representative in public proceedings; or
( 3 ) Make the collection of penalties and assessments under 31 U.S.C. 3806.
( b ) The ALJ shall not be responsible to, or subject to the supervision or direction of, the investigating official or the reviewing official.
( c ) Except as provided in paragraph (a) of this section, the representative for the Government may be employed anywhere in the authority, including in the offices of either the investigating official or the reviewing official.
§ 1013.38 Reconsideration of initial decision. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, any party may file a motion for reconsideration of the initial decision within 20 days of receipt of the initial decision. If service was made by mail, receipt will be presumed to be five days from the date of mailing in the absence of contrary proof.
( b ) Every such motion must set forth the matters claimed to have been erroneously decided and the nature of the alleged errors. Such motion shall be accompanied by a supporting brief.
( c ) Responses to such motions shall be allowed only upon request of the ALJ.
( d ) No party may file a motion for reconsideration of an initial decision that has been revised in response to a previous motion for reconsideration.
( e ) The ALJ may dispose of a motion for reconsideration by denying it or by issuing a revised initial decision.
( f ) If the ALJ denies a motion for reconsideration, the initial decision shall constitute the final decision of the authority head and shall be final and binding on the parties 30 days after the ALJ denies the motion, unless the initial decision is timely appealed to the authority head in accordance with § 1013.39.
( g ) If the ALJ issues a revised initial decision, that decision shall constitute the final decision of the authority head and shall be final and binding on the parties 30 days after it is issued, unless it is timely appealed to the authority head in accordance with § 1013.39 of this part.
1506.303-2 Content.

The documentation requirements in this section apply only to acquisitions processed using other

than small purchase procedures. (Refer to 1513.170 for documentation for small purchase

acquisitions).

(a) The initiating office shall prepare a written justification for other than full and open competition

(JOFOC) that documents the facts and circumstances substantiating the infeasibility of full and open

competition for each recommended limited sources or sole source acquisition when required by FAR

6.302.

(b) The recommendation shall be entitled “Justification for Other Than Full and Open Competition”

and shall be signed at the programmatic Division Director or comparable office level prior to

submission with the procurement request. The JOFOC shall contain the information prescribed in

FAR 6.303-2 (a) and (b).

(c) If unusual and compelling urgency (see FAR 6.303-2) is a basis for the JOFOC, then the following

applies. Explain the circumstances that led to the need for an urgent contractual action. Explain why

the requirement could not have been processed in sufficient time to permit full and open

competition. It should be noted that the existence of legislation, court order, or Presidential mandate

is not, of itself, a sufficient basis for a JOFOC. However, the circumstances necessitating legislation,

court order, or Presidential mandate may justify contractual action on an other than full and open

competition basis.

(d) If the proposed acquisition has been synopsized in accordance with the applicable requirements

in FAR subpart 5.2, the Contracting Officer must incorporate the evaluation of responses to the

synopsis in the JOFOC. (See 1506.371(d) for contents of the evaluation document).

Parent topic: Subpart 1506.3 - Other Than Full and Open Competition