alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                                          1,000

<S>                                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                    SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                                   29
<SECURITIES>                                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                           643
<ALLOWANCES>                                                             46
<INVENTORY>                                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                      1,043
<PP&E>                                                                1,645
<DEPRECIATION>                                                           86
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                        3,504
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                11,272
<BONDS>                                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                                               0
<COMMON>                                                                 12
<OTHER-SE>                                                           (7,982)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                          3,504
<SALES>                                                                 136
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                        136
<CGS>                                                                    82
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         5,334
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    6,998
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                     (12,278)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 (12,278)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       (8,032)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                                        (20,310)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                           (1.77)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                         (1.77)


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Solid Waste Services, Inc., Doing Business as J.P. Mascaro & Sons, Appellant, v New York City Department of Environmental Protection, Respondent.

[814 NYS2d 151]

*319Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael D. Stallman, J.) entered February 8, 2005, which dismissed this proceeding, brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, for failure to join a necessary party, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Necessary parties are those “who ought to be parties if complete relief is to be accorded between the persons who are parties to the action or who might be inequitably affected by a judgment in the action” (CPLR 1001 [a]). In a CPLR article 78 proceeding, the governmental agency that performed the challenged action must be a named party *(see Matter of McNeill v Town Bd. of Town of Ithaca,*260 AD2d 829 [1999], *affd*93 NY2d 812 [1999]).

In seeking vacatur of the decision of the Contract Dispute Resolution Board (CDRB), petitioner named only the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), whose contract it had allegedly breached *(see Matter of Headriver, LLC v Town Bd. of Town of Riverhead,*2 NY3d 766 [2004]). Given this omission, petitioner seeks leave to proceed without CDRB, pursuant to CPLR 1001 (b). While petitioner has no further remedy, and DEP does not claim prejudice, CDRB is still an indispensable party to this proceeding. The failure to join CDRB within the statutory period resulted solely from attorney error, which is not one of the “rare case” factors enumerated in section 1001 (b) militating in favor of allowing this proceeding to continue *(cf. Matter of Red Hook/Gowanus Chamber of Commerce v New York City Bd. of Stds. & Appeals,*5 NY3d 452 [2005]). Concur— Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Friedman, Marlow and Malone, JJ.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-20-00198-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.J.R., A.R. AND A.J.R., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the

438th Judicial District Court of Bexar County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2014CI13956

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

September 17, 2020
637.601 General.       It is the Department's policy that all new service contracts be performance-based, with clearly defined deliverables and performance standards. Any deviations from this policy shall be fully justified in writing and approved by the Departmental Advocate for Competition.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 637.6—Performance-Based Contracting
§ 986.94 Termination. ( a ) The Secretary may at any time terminate this part.
( b ) The Secretary shall terminate or suspend the operation of any or all of the provisions of this part whenever he or she finds that such operation obstructs or does not tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act.
( c ) The Secretary shall terminate the provisions of this part applicable to pecans for market or pecans for handling at the end of any fiscal year whenever the Secretary finds, by referendum or otherwise, that such termination is favored by a majority of growers; *Provided*, That such majority of growers has produced more than 50 percent of the volume of pecans in the production area during such fiscal year. Such termination shall be effective only if announced on or before the last day of the then current fiscal year.
( d ) The Secretary shall conduct a referendum within every five-year period beginning from the implementation of this part, to ascertain whether continuance of the provisions of this part applicable to pecans are favored by two-thirds by number or volume of growers voting in the referendum. The Secretary may terminate the provisions of this part at the end of any fiscal year in which the Secretary has found that continuance of this part is not favored by growers who, during an appropriate period of time determined by the Secretary, have been engaged in the production of pecans in the production area: *Provided*, That termination of this part shall be effective only if announced on or before the last day of the then current fiscal year.
( e ) The provisions of this part shall, in any event, terminate whenever the provisions of the Act authorizing them cease to be in effect.
Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification
 
 I, J. Theodore Borter, certify that:
 
 1.
 
 I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the GS Mortgage Securities Trust 2012-GCJ9 (the "Exchange Act Periodic Reports");
 
 2.
 
 Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.
 
 Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports;
 
 4.
 
 Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and
 
 5.
 
 All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.
 
 In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor, U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 By:
 /s/ J. Theodore Borter
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Name:          J. Theodore Borter
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Title:
 President
 Dated:  July 8, 2013
#### § 993.518 Compliance.

Whenever the season average price to producers for prunes is below the parity level specified in section 2(1) of the act, no handler shall ship consumer packages of prunes unless such prunes are packed and labeled in accordance with the specifications prescribed in this subpart; and whether prices are above or below parity, no handler shall use the nomenclature designations in § 993.515(b) to describe size categories other than those prescribed pursuant to § 993.515(c).
1344.302 Requirements.

The designee authorized to lower or raise the $25 million sales threshold for performing a review to

determine if a contractor purchasing system review is needed is set forth in CAM 1301.70.

Parent topic: Subpart 1344.3 - Contractors' Purchasing Systems Reviews
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 1,
2011 of Insteel Industries, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
    /s/ H. O. Woltz IIIH. O. Woltz IIIPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
|CoreLogic(Logo) | NATIONAL 
TAX SEARCH(Logo) | 130 S. Jefferson
Street
Suite 300
        Chicago, IL 60661
|--------------- | -------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------



REPORT ON ASSESSMENT
OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION’S REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA



For the calendar
year ending December 31, 2019, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for Wells Fargo Bank (the “Servicer”).



National
Tax Search, LLC (“NTS”) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2019 and for the period from January
1, 2019 through December 31, 2019 (the “Reporting Period”) with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section
229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the “CFR”). NTS has used the servicing criteria communicated to NTS by
the Servicer to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Only servicing criteria 1122(d)(l)(ii), 1122(d)(1)(iv),
1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(2)(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”)
are applicable to the activities NTS performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS has determined that
the remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs
with respect to the transactions covered by this report. The transactions covered by this report include all tax payments made
on behalf of the Servicer using NTS’s TaxQ system (the “Platform Transactions”).



NTS,
as a vendor, has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that
NTS has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2019 and for the Reporting
Period with respect to the Platform Transactions taken as a whole.



Plante &
Moran, PLLC, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance
with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2019 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.



National Tax Search, LLC, as Vendor
to Servicer



/s/ Lori D. Eshoo

Lori D. Eshoo

Executive,Operations

January 30, 2020
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

WILLIE MCNAIR, )

)

 Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06-cv-695-WKW

) [wo]

)

RICHARD ALLEN, et al., )

)

 Defendants. )

ORDER

Upon consideration of the plaintiff’s Motion to Reschedule Status Conference Date

(Doc. # 13), it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. The status conference is continued from

November 16, 2006, to November 28, 2006, at 10 a.m.

Done this the 31st day of October, 2006.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 14 Filed 10/31/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Watson, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered March 17, 1978, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, assault in the first degree, and petit larceny, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. The trial court’s instructions with respect to the law relating to identification evidence and the factors to be weighed by the jury in assessing such evidence were adequate. Although the trial court erred in failing to relate these legal principles to the evidence adduced at trial (see *People v Carney,*73 AD2d 972), we are of the view that, under the circumstances of this case, such error was cured when, at the jury’s request during its deliberations, the jury was read all of the testimony of the two witnesses who identified defendant (see *People v Vargas,*74 AD2d 859). We have examined the remaining contentions raised by the defendant and find them to be without merit. Gibbons, J. P., Gulotta, Margett and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1108 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1108

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                        December 9 (legislative day, December 8), 2006.
    Resolved, That a committee of two Members be appointed by the House to join 
a similar committee appointed by the Senate, to wait upon the President of the 
United States and inform him that the two Houses have completed their business 
of the session and are ready to adjourn, unless the President has some other 
communication to make to them.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### LeRoy M. Thomas et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. State of New York, Respondent-Appellant.

(Claim No. 46746.)

—Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: In affirming the judgment we point out that while the State has cross-appealed it has asked that the award be affirmed. With relation to the only issue before us, we find no basis for holding the award to be inadequate. (Appeals from judgment of Court of Claims in claim for damages for permanent appropriation and easements.) Present — Del Vecchio, J. P., Marsh, Moule, Bastow and Henry, JJ.
#### George J. Dippell, Respondent, v Margery Dippell, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated January 8,1980, which denied her motion “to vacate and amend” a stipulation of settlement. The appeal brings up for review so much of a further order of the same court, dated May 6, 1980, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination. Appeal from the order dated January 8, 1980 dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements. That order was superseded by the order granting reargument. Order dated May 6, 1980 affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements. No opinion. Hopkins, J. P., Titone, Mangano and Gibbons, JJ., concur.
COURTROOM DEPUTY’S MINUTES MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/INITIAL APPEARANCE DATE: August 9, 2006

 BOND HEARING

 DETENTION HEARING Digital Recording 4:05 - 4:15

 PRELIMINARY (EXAMINATION)(HEARING)

 REMOVAL HEARING (R.40)

 ARRAIGNMENT

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PRESIDING MAG. JUDGE: Susan Russ Walker DEPUTY CLERK: Joyce Taylor

CASE NO. 2:06mj79-SRW DEFENDANT NAME: Harry Edward Jones, III

AUSA: Christopher Snyder DEFT. ATTY: Russell Duraski

Type Counsel: ( )Retained; (/ ) CJA; ( ) Waived; ( ) FPD

USPO/USPTS: Tamara Martin

Interpreter needed: ( / ) NO; ( )YES Name:

____________________________________________________________________________

/ Date of Arrest August 9, 2006 or  Arrest Rule 40

/ Deft First Appearance. Advised of rights/charges.  Prob/Sup Rel Violator

/ Financial Affidavit executed. ORAL MOTION for appointment of Counsel.

/ ORAL ORDER appointing CJA Panel Attorney Russell Duraski - Notice of

Appearance to be filed

 Panel Attorney Appointed;  to be appointed - prepare voucher

 Deft. Advises he will retain counsel. Has retained _____________________

/  Government’s ORAL Motion for Detention Hrg.  to be followed by written

motion; /Government’s WRITTEN Motion for Detention Hrg. filed

/ Detention Hearing/Preliminary Examination set August 15, 2006 @ 3:00 p.m.

 ORDER OF TEMPORARY DETENTION PENDING HEARING to be entered

 ORDER OF DETENTION HEARING PENDING TRIAL to be entered

 Release order entered. Deft advised of conditions of release

  BOND EXECUTED (M/D AL charges) $. Deft released

 BOND EXECUTED (R. 40) - deft to report to originating district as ordered

 Bond not executed. Defendant to remain in Marshal’s custody

 Deft. ORDERED REMOVED to originating district

 Waiver of  preliminary hearing;  Waiver Rule 40 hearing

 Court finds PROBABLE CAUSE. Defendant bound over to the Grand Jury

 ARRAIGNMENT HELD. Plea of NOT GUILTY entered. Set for

DISCOVERY DISCLOSURE DATE: 

 WAIVER of Speedy Trial. CRIMINAL TERM: 

 NOTICE to retained Criminal Defense Attorney handed to counsel

Case 2:06-mj-00079-SRW Document 7 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                             5
<LEGEND>

This schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted from Angeles
Income  Properties,  LTD. IV 2000 First  Quarter  10-QSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.

</LEGEND>

<CIK>                                 0000763049
<NAME>                                Angeles Income Properties, LTD. IV
<MULTIPLIER>                                              1,000


<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                        JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                    1,351
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              0 <F1>
<PP&E>                                                   20,518
<DEPRECIATION>                                           12,639
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           10,754
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         0 <F1>
<BONDS>                                                  14,814
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                               (4,457)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             10,754
<SALES>                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            938
<CGS>                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          1,092
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          371
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                               (154)
<EPS-BASIC>                                               (1.15)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0
<FN>

<F1> Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet. <F2> Multiplier is 1.

</FN>


</TABLE>
Skip to ContentArchivesSearch NLM Web SiteNLM Home | About the ArchivesHome > **NLM Archives** >     **Document content is not current. Links may be broken.** This document has been moved to the NLM Archives:**Title:**List of Journals Indexed for MEDLINE**Revised URL:**http://www.nlm.nih.gov/archive/20130415/tsd/serials/lji.html**Permanence Level:**Permanent: Dynamic Content**Last Updated:**18 March 2013**First Published:**01 April 1998**Metadata**

----

Copyright, Privacy, Accessibility     U.S. National Library of Medicine, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20894National Institutes of Health, Health & Human Services