alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                            $320
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  $79,076
<ALLOWANCES>                                    $1,257
<INVENTORY>                                    136,476
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               224,450
<PP&E>                                         347,122
<DEPRECIATION>                                 179,663
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                $398,507
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          120,655
<BONDS>                                        110,847
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        80,392
<OTHER-SE>                                      82,010
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   398,507
<SALES>                                        264,424
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               264,424
<CGS>                                          246,307
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  246,307
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,342
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   550
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,029
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,436)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,081)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,368)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,368)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  $(0.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  $(0.30)
        

</TABLE>
#### SOCIETY FOR RELIEF OF DESTITUTE CHILDREN OF SEAMEN v. McDaniel et al.

(Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.

July 31, 1914.)

1. Receivers (§ 198*)—Allowances—Extra Allowance.

Under Code Civ. Proc. § 3320, providing that, where the commissions oí a receiver shall not amount to $100, the court in its discretion may allow the receiver a sum not exceeding $100 for his commissions, the court has no discretion to make an extra allowance to a receiver, where his commissions exceed $100.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Receivers, Cent. Dig. §§ 392-396; Dec. Dig. § 198.*]

*9522. Receivers (§ 194*)—Attorneys—Allowance.

The attorney of a receiver is not entitled to allowances for services ren- • dered in collecting rents, drawing checks, etc.; such services not being legal services and being those which should be performed by the receiver.

[Ed. Note.—Eor other cases, see Receivers, Cent. Dig. §§ 385, 386; Dec. Dig. § 194.*]

Action by the Society for the Relief of Destitute Children of Seamen against Mary J. McDaniel and others. On motion to settle and pass receivers accounts and for extra allowance to the receiver and for an allowance to bis attorney. Account settled, and allowance to attorneys granted, but extra allowance to receiver denied.

Francis W. Pollock, of New York City, for the motion.

Frederick de Peyster Foster, of New York City, opposed.

*

For other cases see same topic *&*§ number in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep’r Indexes

GIEGERICH, J.

[1] There being no objection to the receiver’s accounts, they are settled and passed, as prayed for. The receiver asks for an allowance, which is opposed by the plaintiff. The receiver’s commissions, computed at the rate of 5 per centum upon the sums received and disbursed, considerably exceed the sum of $100. Section 3320 of the Code of Civil Procedure provides that where the commissions of a temporary or permanent receiver, so computed, shall not amount to $100, the court or judge may, in its or his discretion, allow the said receiver such a sum, not exceeding $100, for his commissions as shall be commensurate with the services rendered by said receiver. The court has therefore no power to grant an extra allowance to a receiver, where his commissions exceed $100. The receiver’s application for an allowance is denied, and the amount of his commissions will be fixed.when the order to be entered hereon is presented for settlement.

[2] Objection is also made by the plaintiff to an allowance to the receiver’s attorney for services rendered other than of a legal character. Some of tbe services mentioned in the affidavit, and upon' which the request for an allowance is made, consist of the receipt of rents and depositing the same in a trust company, the receipt of bills and drawing of checks for the receiver to sign, and other routine matters . which should have been attended to by tbe receiver or by the agent employed by him to collect the rents and manage the property. No allowance can be made for such services. The sum of $200 is allowed for necessary legal services rendered and still to be rendered to procure the discharge of the receiver.
231.703 Requirements.       Under 10 U.S.C. 4652, the costs cited in 231.205-22 (a) are unallowable.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 231.7 - CONTRACTS WITH NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS
#### § 955.209 Assessment rate.

On and after January 1, 2008, an assessment rate of $0.13 per 40-pound carton or equivalent is established for Vidalia onions.

[73 FR 31607, June 3, 2008]
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-10572

Summary Calendar

EMMA MAE MCDONNELL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Texas

(7:94-CV-101)

January 23, 1996

Before GARWOOD, JOLLY and PARKER, Circuit Judges. *

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from the dismissal of appella nt’s claims

brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA). She argues that,

after she filed her workers’ compensa tion claim for employmentrelated physical injury pursuant to the Federal Employees’

Compensation Act (FECA), she was on that account subjected to

retaliatory employment discrimination and discharge and to2

intentional infliction of emotional distress, during her employment

and in relation to her discharge, by the Postal Service, her former

employer. She argues that the district court erred in determining

that FECA’s exclusive remedy provision barred her claims under the

FTCA. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

We agree, generally for the reasons given in this respect by the

district court, that appellant’s FTCA claims are precluded by the

FECA and the Civil Service Reform Act (CSRA) as made applicable to

Postal Service employment by the Postal Reorganization Act. S ee

Benton v. United States , 960 F.2d 19, 21 (5th Cir. 1992); Morales

v. Dept. of the Army

, 947 F.2d 76 6, 768-69 (5th Cir. 1991). S ee

also Pereira v. United States Postal Service

, 964 F.2d 873, 875

(9th Cir. 1992); Saul v. United Sta tes , 928 F.2d 829 (9th Cir.

1991). We note that L ingle v. Norge Div. of Magic Chef, Inc

., 486

U.S. 399 (1988), relied on by appellant, deals with wholly private

employment and does n ot involve the FTCA, the FECA, or the CSRA.

Similarly, in Truman v. United States

, 26 F.3d 592 (5th Cir. 1994),

also relied on by appellant, the plaintiff was not a federal

employee, and t he FECA and the CSRA were not involved. Postal

Service employees are federal employees and a part of the civil

service. 39 U.S.C. § 1001(b). We do not reach the discretionary

function issue.

AFFIRMED
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3146 

To reduce temporarily the duty on formulated product Krovar I DF. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. CHAMBLISS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on formulated product 

Krovar I DF. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FORMULATED PRODUCT KROVAR I DF. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.13.27 Formulations containing 5- 

bromo-3-sec-butyl-6- 

methyluracil (Bromacil) 

(CAS No. 314–40–9), 3- 

(3,4-Dichlorophenyl)–1,1- 

dimethylurea (Diuron) (CAS 

No. 330–54–1), and application adjuvants (provided for 

in subheading 3808.30.15) .. 2.5% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 3146 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
#### § 981.23 Part and subpart.

*Part* means the order regulating the handling of almonds grown in the State of California, and all rules, regulations, and supplementary orders issued thereunder, and the aforesaid order shall be a *subpart* of such part.
252.204-7008 Compliance with Safeguarding Covered Defense Information Controls.       As prescribed in                 204.7304             (a), use the following provision:          COMPLIANCE WITH SAFEGUARDING COVERED DEFENSE INFORMATION CONTROLS (OCT 2016)          (a)  *Definitions*.  As used in this provision—          “Controlled technical information,” “covered contractor information system,” “covered defense information,” “cyber incident,” “information system,” and “technical information” are defined in clause                 252.204-7012             , Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber Incident Reporting.          (b)  The security requirements required by contract clause                 252.204-7012             , shall be implemented for all covered defense information on all covered contractor information systems that support the performance of this contract.          (c)  For covered contractor information systems that are not part of an information technology service or system operated on behalf of the Government (see                 252.204-7012             (b)(2)—          (1)  By submission of this offer, the Offeror represents that it will implement the security requirements specified by National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication (SP) 800-171 “Protecting Controlled Unclassified Information in Nonfederal Information Systems and Organizations” (see http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-171) that are in effect at the time the solicitation is issued or as authorized by the contracting officer not later than December 31, 2017.          (2)(i)  If the Offeror proposes to vary from any of the security requirements specified by NIST SP 800-171 that are in effect at the time the solicitation is issued or as authorized by the Contracting Officer, the Offeror shall submit to the Contracting Officer, for consideration by the DoD Chief Information Officer (CIO), a written explanation of—          (A)  Why a particular security requirement is not applicable; or          (B)  How an alternative but equally effective, security measure is used to compensate for the inability to satisfy a particular requirement and achieve equivalent protection.          (ii)  An authorized representative of the DoD CIO will adjudicate offeror requests to vary from NIST SP 800-171 requirements in writing prior to contract award.  Any accepted variance from NIST SP 800-171 shall be incorporated into the resulting contract.          (End of provision)    **Parent topic:** 252.204 RESERVED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

LINDA WILLIAMS SHELTON, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-719-WKW

) 

ALL STATE FREIGHTWAYS, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Defendant’s Motion for Leave for Rule 26 Supplementation Order

(Doc. #15), it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. The Defendant has leave to supplement

its Rule 26(a)(2) Expert Disclosure until October 30, 2007. 

DONE this 2nd day of October, 2007.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00719-WKW-WC Document 16 Filed 10/02/2007 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,227,475
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,110,852
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,009,120
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       34,359,284<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        1,250,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,087,673
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,009,120
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            37,215,109
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               37,628,445
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,795,250
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,208,586)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,208,586)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,237,178)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.95)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.95)
<FN>
<F1>UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### § 985.74 Effect of termination or amendment.

Unless otherwise expressly provided by the Secretary, the termination of this subpart or of any regulation issued pursuant to this subpart, or the issuance of any amendment to either thereof, shall not (a) affect or waive any right, duty, obligation, or liability which shall have risen or which may thereafter arise in connection with any provision of this subpart or any regulation issued hereunder, or (b) release or extinguish any violation of this subpart or any regulation issued hereunder, or (c) affect or impair any rights or remedies of the Secretary or any other person with respect to any such violation.
Subpart 5246.7 - WARRANTIES     **Parent topic:** Part 5246 - QUALITY ASSURANCE5246.703 Criteria for use of warranties.    Notwithstanding FAR 46.703 and in accordance with             10 U.S.C. 8688, contracts for new construction          shipbuilding, for which funds are expended from the Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy          account, shall require, as a condition of the contract, that the work performed under the          contract is covered by a warranty for a period of at least one year.       (S-90) Waiver. If the contracting officer for a contract covered by the requirement for a new shipbuilding contract warranty determines that a limited liability of warranted work is in the best interest of the Government, the contracting officer may agree to limit the liability of the work performed under the contract to a level that the contracting officer determines is sufficient to protect the interests of the Government and is in keeping with historical levels of warranted work on similar vessels.5246.704 Authority for use of warranties.    (S-90) Notwithstanding DFARS 246.704 (1) and (2)          and in accordance with 10 U.S.C. 8688, chief of          the contracting office approval is not required for the use of a warranty for new          construction shipbuilding for which funds are expended from the Shipbuilding and          Conversion, Navy account and the contract is effective on or after the date of enactment of          the National Defense Authorization for FY2018.5246.706 Warranty terms and conditions.    (b)(2) *Remedies*.       (iv) Acceptable turnaround time(s) for warranty corrective actions taken by the contractor should be specified, and consideration should be given to using liquidated damages or charging the contractor for product replacement costs when specified turnaround times are not met.       (5) *Markings*. Warranted items should be marked with the National Stock Number (NSN) or manufacturer's part number, a serial number or other item identifier (if the warranty applies to uniquely identified items), the contract number, an indication that a warranty applies, the manufacturer or entity (if other than the contractor) providing the warranty, the date or time the warranty expires, and an indication of whether or not attempted on-site repair by DON personnel will void the warranty.
#### § 98.1 General.

Analytical services of meat and meat food products are performed for fat, moisture, salt, protein, and other content specifications.
Part 5612 - ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL ITEMS       Subpart 5612.1 - ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL ITEMS GENERAL                                                         5612.101 Policy.                                                            5612.102 Applicability.                                                                             Subpart 5612.2 - SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL ITEMS                                                         5612.202 Market Research and Description of Agency Need.                                                                           5612.207-90 Contract Type.                                                                                                                            Subpart 5612.3 - SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES FOR THE ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL ITEMS                                                         5612.302 Tailoring of Provisions and Clauses for Acquisition of Commercial Items. (Removed June 2021)    Subpart 5612.1 - ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL ITEMS  GENERAL     5612.101 Policy.    If during the acquisition process new evidence or additional requirements indicate the item no longer falls into the category of a commercial item, the solicitation shall be cancelled and reissued.5612.102 Applicability.    *(Revised June 2018)*       (a)(1) When using FAR Part 12 procedures for acquisitions exceeding $1 million in value, the RAO, APM, or PM is responsible for completing the commerciality determination memorandum template).       (f)(1) The Director of Procurement, USSOCOM, as the head of agency, delegates the authority to determine applicability of FAR 12.102(f) to USSOCOM headquarters contracting divisions and field contracting office chiefs. Determinations are to be in writing and included in each file.Subpart 5612.2 - SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL ITEMS    *(Added July 2008)* 5612.202 Market Research and Description of Agency Need.    (a) For acquisitions in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, the market research report template should be completed. 5612.207-90 Contract Type.    The determination to use a firm-fixed-price with economic price adjustment (FFP/EPA) shall be documented. See FAR 16.203-3 for the required contents of the determination.Subpart 5612.3 - SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES FOR THE ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL ITEMS     5612.302 Tailoring of Provisions and Clauses for Acquisition of Commercial Items. (Removed June 2021)    HQ, United States Special Operations Command       Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L-K)       SOFARS 5612       February 2007
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

LONNIE CAMMON, #236498, )

)

 Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06-CV-674-WKW

)

DOCTOR SEDIET, et al., )

)

 Defendants )

ORDER

Upon consideration of the motion for more definite statement filed by the defendants

on August 11, 2006 (Court Doc. No. 7), and for good cause, it is

ORDERED that:

1. This motion be and is hereby GRANTED. 

2. On or before August 25, 2006, the plaintiff shall file an amendment to his

complaint which (i) specifically describes how the defendants violated his constitutional

rights, and (ii) asserts with clarity those factual allegations material to his claims for relief.

3. The defendants be GRANTED an extension from September 11, 2006 to and

including September 26, 2006 to file their special report and answer. 

In responding to this order, the plaintiff should set forth short and plain statements

setting forth his claims for relief. Each allegation in the amendment must be simple,

concise and direct. See Rule 8, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The plaintiff is

cautioned that failure to respond to this order will result in a recommendation that this case

Case 2:06-cv-00674-WKW-TFM Document 9 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

be dismissed.

Done this 14th day of August, 2006.

/s/ Delores R. Boyd

DELORES R. BOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00674-WKW-TFM Document 9 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 2 of 2
IV 

House Calendar No. 251 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1102 

[Report No. 109–725] 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules and 

providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 7, 2006 

Mrs. CAPITO, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with 

respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported 

from the Committee on Rules and providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules. 

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule 

2 XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the 

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to 

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported on the legislative day of December 8, 2006. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

HRES 1102 RH 

1 SEC. 2. It shall be in order at any time on the legisla2 tive day of December 8, 2006, for the Speaker to entertain 

3 motions that the House suspend the rules. The Speaker 

4 or his designee shall consult with the Minority Leader or 

5 her designee on the designation of any matter for consid6 eration pursuant to this resolution. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS

bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 251 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1102 

[Report No. 109

–725] 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII 

the rules. providing for consideration of motions to suspend tions reported from the Committee on Rules and with respect to consideration of certain resoluDECEMBER 7, 2006 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS