alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1005.9 How does the Secretary receive and respond to comments? ( a ) The Secretary follows the procedures in § 1005.10 if: ( 1 ) A state office or official is designated to act as a single point of contact between a state process and all federal agencies, and
( 2 ) That office or official transmits a state process recommendation for a program selected under § 1005.6.
( b ) ( 1 ) The single point of contact is not obligated to transmit comments from state, areawide, regional or local officials and entities where there is no state process recommendation.
( 2 ) If a state process recommendation is transmitted by a single point of contact, all comments from, state, areawide, regional, and local officials and entities that differ from it must also be transmitted.
( c ) If a state has not established a process, or is unable to submit a state process recommendation, state, areawide, regional and local officials and entities may submit comments either to the applicant or to the Department.
( d ) If a program or activity is not selected for a state process, state, areawide, regional and local officials and entities may submit comments either to the applicant or to the Department. In addition, if a state process recommendation for a nonselected program or activity is transmitted to the Department by the single point of contact, the Secretary follows the procedures of § 1005.10 of this part.
( e ) The Secretary considers comments which do not constitute a state process recommendation submitted under these regulations and for which the Secretary is not required to apply the procedures of § 1005.10 of this part, when such comments are provided by a single point of contact, by the applicant, or directly to the Department by a commenting party.
Docket No: FAA-2014-1046 Dir ID: 2014-NM-021-AD
# Subpart 2942.1 - Contract Audit Services

**Parent topic:**PART 2942 - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT SERVICES

## 2942.101 Policy.

The OASAM Division of Cost Determination is responsible for establishing billing rates and indirect cost rates as prescribed in FAR 42.7 for the Department of Labor.
Case 2:06-cv-00719-WKW-WC Document 20 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00719-WKW-WC Document 20 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00719-WKW-WC Document 20 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00719-WKW-WC Document 20 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 4 of 4
Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/03/2006 Page 1 of 21
Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/03/2006 Page 2 of 21
Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/03/2006 Page 3 of 21
Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/03/2006 Page 4 of 21
Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/03/2006 Page 5 of 21
Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/03/2006 Page 6 of 21
Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/03/2006 Page 7 of 21
Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/03/2006 Page 8 of 21
Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/03/2006 Page 9 of 21
Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/03/2006 Page 10 of 21
Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/03/2006 Page 11 of 21
Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/03/2006 Page 12 of 21
Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/03/2006 Page 13 of 21
Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/03/2006 Page 14 of 21
Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/03/2006 Page 15 of 21
Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/03/2006 Page 16 of 21
Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/03/2006 Page 17 of 21
Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/03/2006 Page 18 of 21
Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/03/2006 Page 19 of 21
Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/03/2006 Page 20 of 21
Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/03/2006 Page 21 of 21
Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 1-2 Filed 08/03/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 1-3 Filed 08/03/2006 Page 1 of 1
1 John T. Boyd, Chi ef Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Ap peals, sitting by

assignment
. NO. 07-02-0470 -CV IN THE COU RT OF APP EALS FOR THE SEVENT H DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMA RILLO PANE L E NOVEM BER 19, 2002

______________________________ INDYM AC MO RTGAGE H OLDINGS, INC., F/K/A INDEPENDENT NATIONAL M ORTGAGE CORPORATION, APPELLANT V. BESSIE BOCKMAN AND CARL RAY SCHRAM, APPELLEES

_________________________________ FROM THE 221 ST DISTRICT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNT Y; NO. 00-05-03161-CV; HONORAB LE SUZA NNE STOV ALL, JUDG E

_______________________________ Before REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ. and BOYD, S.J. 1 Appellant Indymac Mortgage Holdings, Inc . f/k/a Independent National Mortgage Corporation filed an unopposed Motion to D ismiss on N ovem ber 13, 2002, averring that it nolong er w ishe d topro sec utethis app eal.2

W ithout passing on the merits of the case, the appel lant’s mo tion for dism iss al is granted and the appeal is hereby dism issed. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2. A ll costs having been paid, no o rde r pe rta ining to t he costs ism ade . H avin g dismisse d the appeal at the appell ant’s request, no m otion for rehearing will be entertained and our mand ate will issue forthwith.

Phil Johnson Justice

Do not publish.
§ 1003.2 Definitions. ( a ) As used in this part: *Action* means an affirmative act by DOE that carries the force of law.
*Aggrieved,* with respect to a person, means adversely affected by an action of the DOE.
*Alternative Dispute Resolution* means any technique for resolving disputes and managing conflict without resorting to litigation in either an administrative or judicial forum. Alternative Dispute Resolution techniques include, but are not limited to, mediation, facilitation, and shuttle diplomacy.
*Decision and Order* means the OHA's final decision on a petition brought under this part.
*Director* means the Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals or duly authorized delegate.
*DOE* means the Department of Energy, created by the Department of Energy Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7101 *et seq.*), and the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA).
*Duly authorized representative* means a person who has been designated to appear before the Office of Hearings and Appeals in connection with a proceeding on behalf of a person interested in or aggrieved by an action of the DOE. Such appearance may consist of the submission of a written document, a personal appearance, verbal communication, or any other participation in the proceeding.
*Federal legal holiday* means any calendar day designated as a federal holiday by federal statute or Executive order.
*Final disposition of DOE* means a DOE rule, order, or other action in any matter other than: ( i ) A rulemaking;
( ii ) An internal DOE order or directive issued by the Secretary of Energy or his delegate in the management and administration of departmental elements and functions; or
( iii ) Any decision or order issued under 41 U.S.C. 4712 or under part 708, part 710, part 712, or part 1004 of this title.
*OHA* means the Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Department of Energy.
*Participant* means a non-party entity that submits a comment, briefing, or other filing in a proceeding.
*Party* means the petitioner and any adverse entity, which may include the DOE, which assumes the role of defendant or respondent in the proceeding.
*Person* means any individual, firm, estate, trust, sole proprietorship, partnership, association, company, joint-venture, corporation, governmental unit or instrumentality thereof, or a charitable, educational or other institution, and includes any officer, director, owner or duly authorized representative thereof.
*Petition* means a written submission to the OHA requesting that the OHA grant the petitioner relief.
*Petitioner* means any person filing a petition with the OHA.
*Proceeding* means the process and activity, and any part thereof, instituted by the OHA—either on its own initiative or in response to a petition submitted by a person—that may lead to an action by the OHA.
*Verified email address* means an email address that is publicly published or available upon request, or, if no such address exists, an email address through which the sender has communicated with the recipient in the previous 12 months.
( b ) Throughout this part the use of a word or term in the singular includes the plural, and the use of the male pronoun is gender neutral.
NO ONE ATTENDED THE PUBLIC HEARING AND NO COMMENTS WERE RECEIVED DURINGTHE 30-DA Y COMMENT PERIOD
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-40405

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Josias Reyes, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:19-CR-276-6

Before Smith, Stewart, and Graves, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Josias Reyes has moved for leave 

to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 

U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Reyes has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 23, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-40405 Document: 00516105394 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/23/2021
No. 21-40405

2

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate 

review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 21-40405 Document: 00516105394 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/23/2021
§ 1013.39 Appeal to authority head. ( a ) Any defendant who has filed a timely answer and who is determined in an initial decision to be liable for a civil penalty or assessment may appeal such decision to the authority head by filing a notice of appeal with the authority head in accordance with this section.
( b ) ( 1 ) A notice of appeal may be filed at any time within 30 days after the ALJ issues an initial decision. However, if any party files a motion for reconsideration under § 1013.38 of this part, consideration of the appeal shall be stayed automatically pending resolution of the motion for reconsideration.
( 2 ) If a motion for reconsideration is timely filed, a notice of appeal may be filed within 30 days after the ALJ denies the motion or issues a revised initial decision, whichever applies.
( 3 ) The authority head may extend the initial 30-day period for an additional 30 days if the defendant files with the authority head a request for an extension within the initial 30-day period and shows good cause.
( c ) If the defendant files a timely notice of appeal with the authority head and the time for filing motions for reconsideration under § 1013.38 of this part has expired, the ALJ shall forward the record of the proceeding to the authority head.
( d ) A notice of appeal shall be accompanied by a written brief specifying exceptions to the initial decision and reasons supporting the exceptions.
( e ) The representative for the Government may file a brief in opposition to exceptions within 30 days of receiving the notice of appeal and accompanying brief.
( f ) There is no right to appear personally before the authority head.
( g ) There is no right to appeal any interlocutory ruling by the ALJ.
( h ) In reviewing the initial decision, the authority head shall not consider any objection that was not raised before the ALJ unless a demonstration is made of extraordinary circumstances causing the failure to raise the objection.
( i ) If any party demonstrates to the satisfaction of the authority head that additional evidence not presented at such hearing is material and that there were reasonable grounds for the failure to present such evidence at such hearing, the authority head shall remand the matter to the ALJ for consideration of such additional evidence.
( j ) The authority head may affirm, reduce, reverse, compromise, remand, or settle any penalty or assessment determined by the ALJ in any initial decision.
( k ) The authority head shall promptly serve each party to the appeal with a copy of the decision of the authority head and a statement describing the right of any person determined to be liable for a penalty or an assessment to seek judicial review.
( l ) Unless a petition for review is filed as provided in 31 U.S.C. 3805 after a defendant has exhausted all administrative remedies under this part and within 60 days after the date on which the authority head serves the defendant with a copy of the authority head's decision, a determination that a defendant is liable under § 1013.3 of this part is final and is not subject to judicial review.
Case 2:06-cr-00206-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 10/23/2006 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                         MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                        12
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              13
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                13
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                    13
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  13
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-2257

VIVA GODDARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JO ANNE BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Elizabeth V. Hallanan, Senior District Judge. (CA-00-491-2) Submitted: April 16, 2002 Decided: April 29, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Carter Zerbe, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. James A. Winn, Regional Chief Counsel, Region III, Victor J. Pane, Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Kasey Warner, United States Attorney, Kelly R. Curry, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Viva Goddard appeals from the district court’s order granting the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s motion for judgment on the pleadings on her claims for disability insurance benefits. We have reviewed the record, the briefs, and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Goddard v. Barnhart , No. CA00-491-2 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 7, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Subpart 3023.3—Hazardous Material

Identification and Material Safety Data

Parent topic: PART 3023—ENVIRONMENT, ENERGY AND WATER EFFICIENCY, RENEWABLE

ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY, AND DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE

3023.303 Contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at (HSAR) 48 CFR 3052.223–70, Removal or Disposal

of Hazardous Substances—Applicable Licenses and Permits, in solicitations and contracts involving

the removal or disposal of hazardous waste material.
#### § 959.7 Handle.

*Handle* or *ship* means to package, load, sell, transport, or in any way to place onions in the current of the commerce within the production area or between the production area and any point outside thereof. Such term shall not include the transportation, sale, or delivery of field-run onions to a person in the production area who is a registered handler.

[27 FR 227, Mar. 9, 1962, as amended at 34 FR 6440, Apr. 12, 1969]
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Mineralresources of the Medicine Lodge, Alkali Creek, and Trapper Creek Wildernessstudy areas, Big Horn County, Wyoming.**** 
SuDocNumber: I 19.3:1756-A
ItemNumber: 0620
CGPsystem Number:000594817
 
Report
Plate
 
 **
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 40437 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
VICTOR MANUEL ARENAS

- CRUZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:18

- CR

- 20

- 1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Victor Manuel Arenas

- Cruz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Arenas

- Cruz h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 28, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-40437 Document: 00514739415 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/28/2018No. 18

- 40437

2 presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 18-40437 Document: 00514739415 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/28/2018
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

________________________ DIVISION

_________________________________, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. __________________

)

_________________________________, )

)

Defendants, )

CONFLICT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

COMES NOW ___________________, a in the above-captioned

matter, and in accordance with the order of this Court, making the following disclosure

concerning parent companies, subsidiaries, partners, limited liability entity members and

managers, trustees (but not trust beneficiaries), affiliates, or similar entities reportable under

the provisions of the Middle District of Alabama’s General Order No. 3047:

This party is an individual, or

This party is a governmental entity, or

There are no entities to be reported, or

The following entities and their relationship to the party are hereby reported:

Reportable Entity Relationship to Party

________________________________ _________________________________

________________________________ _________________________________

________________________________ _________________________________

________________________________ _________________________________

 

Date (Signature)

 

(Counsel’s Name)

 

Counsel for (print names of all parties)

 

Address, City, State Zip Code

 

Telephone Number

Case 2:06-cv-00735-MHT-CSC Document 42 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

________________________ DIVISION

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I,____________________________________, do hereby Certify that a true and correct copy

of the foregoing has been furnished by ___________________________(manner of service,

i.e., U.S. Mail, electronic mail, etc.) on this _______day of ____________ 20__, to:

 

 

 

Date Signature

Case 2:06-cv-00735-MHT-CSC Document 42 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Solely
      for the purposes of complying with, and the extent required by 18 U.S.C. 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
      undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
      Financial Officer of Beicang Iron & Steel, Inc., that, to his knowledge, the
      Quarterly Report of the company on Form 10-Q for the period ended September
      30,
      2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the company’s financial condition and
      results of operations.




November
      26, 2007




/s/
                Beicang HouBeicang
                HouChief
                Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)Chief
                Financial Officer (Principal Accounting and Financial
                Officer)