alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3297 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3297

      To suspend temporarily the duty on electric coffee grinders.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 26, 2006

   Mr. Allen introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To suspend temporarily the duty on electric coffee grinders.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELECTRIC COFFEE GRINDERS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.85.09        Electric coffee         Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           grinders (provided                                                31/2009          ''
                           for in subheading                                                                   .
                           8509.40.00)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 959.16 Fiscal period.

*Fiscal period* means the annual period beginning and ending on such dates as may be approved by the Secretary pursuant to recommendations of the committee.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended March 31,
2010 of Nexgen Petroleum Corp., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual
Report”), I, Hsien Loong Wong, President, CEO, CFO, Secretary, Treasurer and a
director of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
    and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.





Dated:
      July 12, 2010
            /s/ Hsien Loong WongHsien
      Loong Wong, President, CEO,
              CFO,
      Secretary, Treasurer and Director
              (Principal
      Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of First Community Financial Corporation, (the
Company) for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Jody D. Graybill, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                              
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Jody D. Graybill         
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Jody D. Graybill             
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | President                    
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
Subpart 1448.1 - Policies and Procedures

Parent topic: PART 1448 - VALUE ENGINEERING

1448.102 Policies.

The HCA shall establish procedures for processing and evaluating VECP's as prescribed in FAR

Subpart 48.1 and 369 DM, Value Engineering.
Subpart 1022.70 - Fair inclusion of

minorities and women

Parent topic: PART 1022 - MINORITY AND WOMEN INCLUSION

1022.7000 Contract clause.

Insert the clause at 1052.222-70, Minority and Women Inclusion, in all solicitations and contracts in

support of Departmental Offices for services that exceed the simplified acquisition threshold.
#### § 985.30 Expenses and compensation.

Members of the Committee, their alternates, subcommittees including any special subcommittees, shall serve without compensation but shall receive such allowances for necessary expenses, incurred in performing their duties, as may be approved by the Committee.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATION*

I, Perry T. Massie, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Outdoor Channel
Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this report fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: May 12, 2005                      /s/ Perry T. Massie
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        PERRY T. MASSIE, Chief Executive Officer


                                       49
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6356

MICHAEL LEGRAND-BEY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

LLOYD L. WATERS, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

THE STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.

(CA-97-1651-AW)

Submitted: May 12, 1998 Decided: June 9, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Legrand-Bey, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,

Annabelle Louise Lisic, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND,

Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief

on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Legrand-Bey v. Waters, No. CA-97-1651-AW (D. Md. Feb.

11, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
February 20, 2014

Mr. Grant E. Goetsch Vice President, Flight Operations

Wisconsin Aviation, Inc. Dane County Regional Airport

3606 Corben Court

Madison, WI 53704-2573

Dear Mr. Goetsch:

This is in response to your January 17, 2014 letter sent to the public docket (No. FAA-2010-0456) petitioning the Federal Avia tion Administration (FAA) on behalf of Wisconsin Aviation, Inc. (Wisconsin Aviation) for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Wisconsin Aviation to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program.

On July 15, 2013, the FAA published the Combined Drug and Alcohol Testing Programs final rule (78 FR 41999) relating to air carrier operators and commuter or on-demand operators that also conduct commercial air tour operations to combine the drug and alcohol testing required for each operation into one testing program. A copy of this rule change and guidance from the FAA’s Drug Abatement Division are enclosed for your information.2 Because the relief you seek is now covered under the new rule, we will take no further action on your petition. If you have any questions, please contact the FAA’s Drug Abatement Division at (202) 267-8442 or drugabatement@faa.gov.

Sincerely,

/s/ Thuy H. Cooper Acting Manager, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
###### Editorial Note on Subpart A of Part 989

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 989 appear at 83 FR 53973, Oct. 26, 2018.

#### § 989.76 Records.

Each handler shall maintain such records of all raisins received, and of all raisins acquired, by him as prescribed by the Committee. Such records shall include, but not be limited to, the quantity of raisins of each varietal type acquired from each person and the name and address of each such person, total acquisitions, total sales, and total other disposition of each varietal type which he handles, and each handler shall maintain such records for at least two years after the termination of the crop year in which the transactions occurred. The Committee, with the approval of the Secretary, may prescribe rules and regulations to include under this section handler records that detail promotion and advertising activities which the Committee may need to perform its functions under § 989.53.

[25 FR 12813, Dec. 14, 1960, as amended at 48 FR 32978, July 20, 1983]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM STATEMENTS
OF FINANCIAL POSITION STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND UNASSIGNED DEFICIT AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        13,778,692
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                       13,778,692
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                         13,778,692
<EQUITIES>                                  31,344,381
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              45,123,073
<CASH>                                       3,299,929
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           6,678,641,843
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                      0
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                               3,370,005
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                            138,593,399
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,600,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  66,066,827
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             6,678,641,843
<PREMIUMS>                                 320,426,572
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          1,344,502
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                 124,998,402
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,721,091)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,721,091)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,721,091)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Grant of Restricted Stock
 
  Rights of Grantee
  Vesting
  Delivery of Shares




---



##### 



Ceasing to Serve as Director
  Dividend Rights
  Withholding of Shares for Taxes
  Grantee Bound by the Plan
  Modification of Agreement
  Severability
  Governing Law
  Successors in Interest
  2




---



##### 



Resolution of Disputes
  3




---



##### 



CVR ENERGY, INC.
    
    GRANTEEBy:
    
    John J. Lipinski
    
    Print Name:Title:
    
    Chief Executive Officer and President
 [Signature Page to Director Restricted Stock Agreement]
#### § 97.22 Revival of an application abandoned for failure to reply.

An application abandoned for failure on the part of the applicant to advance actively his or her application to its completion, in accordance with the regulations in this part, may be revived as a pending application within 3 months of such abandonment, upon a finding by the Commissioner that the failure was inadvertent or unavoidable and without fraudulent intent. A request to revive an abandoned application shall be accompanied by a written statement showing the cause of the failure to respond, a response to the last request for action, and by the specified fee.
#### Milton Kepeos et al., Co-partners Practicing Under the Name of Kepecs & Frischer, Respondents, v. Mervyn J. Lobel, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Judgment for the plaintiffs against defendant-appellant in the sum of $9,803.80 unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, and a new trial granted, without costs or disbursements to any party. Defendant-appellant’s appeal from the dismissal of the complaint as against the codefendant, his wife, is dismissed because of his failure to serve notice of appeal upon her and because plaintiffs did not appeal from such dismissal. When this case was here on a prior appeal, from an order granting summary judgment, we reversed (23 A D 2d 632) and ordered trial of the issues as to whether the services for which plaintiffs seek compensation (1) were necessary, (2) were necessary and were services for which the defendant-appellant may be responsible, (3) were paid by defendant-appellant, and (4) were rendered in reliance upon defendant-appellant’s obligation to pay or otherwise. Regrettably counsel and the court, in nine days of trial under said order, became bogged down in a morass of trivia and confusion of the objects of the trial, and none of said issues was submitted *524to the jury, except the inherent issue of the value of the services rendered. Moreover, in the course of the trial and the charge the jury were confused hy the conflicting statements of items of services which might properly be considered in the case. The essential issues, therefore, are still unresolved, and must be determined by a new trial. It should also be noted that the efforts expended in securing payment herein have far exceeded the services rendered in the brief period plaintiffs were engaged by defendant wife in 1963; and a majority of the court are of the view that the amount of the verdict was excessive. Concur—■ Breitel, J. P., Stevens, Steuer, Capozzoli and Witmer, JJ.
CHAPTER 3. PERMITS AND P ERMIT REVISIONS

ARTICLE 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS RELA TING TO PERM ITS AND PERMIT REV ISIONS

3-1-103. Annual emissions inventory questi onnaire A. Every source su bject to a pe rmit requ iremen t under th is chapter, o r who o btains an a uthorizatio n to ope rate under this chapter, shall complete and submit to the Control Officer an annual em issions inventory questionnai

re. The quest

ionnaire i

s due by March 31 or nine ty days aft

er the Contr

ol Officer

makes the inventory f

orm availabl

e, whichever occurs lat er, and shal

l include emission i

nformation for

the previous calenda r year. Th ese requir emen ts apply w hether ornot a perm it has been issued and whethe r or not a permit appli

cation has

been file

d. B. The questionna ire shal l be on a form provi

ded by the Control

Officer and shall i

nclude the f

ollowing informati

on: 1. The source's name, description, mailing address, contact person and contact person ph one number, and physical ad dress and location , if different than the ma iling address. 2. Process i

nformation for

the source, includi

ng design capac

ity, oper ations schedule, and e

missions control devices, their de scription and efficienc ies. 3. The actu al annua l quantity o f emission s, including docum entation o f the meth od of m easurem ent, calculation or estimation, of:

a. Any single re

gulated ai

r pollut ant in a quant

ity great er than one t

on. b. Any com bination of regu lated air pollutants in a quan tity greater than 21⁄2 to ns. C. The Control Officer may waive a requirement that specific i

nformation or data be submitted i n the annual emissions inventory quest ionnaire for sources

requiring Class B permit s if the Control

Officer determines that the submission or

data would be unnecessary or unreasonable for a part

icular source or cat

egory of sources and i

nstead may requi

re alte rnative i nformation fr

om which emissions

may be determined. [Adopted effective N

ovember 3, 1993. Amend ed February 22, 1995.]
#### § 97.122 Certified seed only election.

When an owner elects after a certificate is issued to sell the protected variety by variety name only as a class of certified seed, a new certificate may be issued upon return of the original certificate to the Office and payment of the appropriate fee.
# Subpart 2922.1 - Basic Labor Policies

**Parent topic:**PART 2922 - APPLICATION OF LABOR LAWS TO GOVERNMENT ACQUISITIONS

## 2922.101-3 Reporting labor disputes.

Potential or actual labor disputes that may interfere with contract performance must be reported by the contracting activity to the Office of the Solicitor for legal advice or assistance. It may also become necessary to seek advice or assistance from the National Office of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, 2100 K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20006, or other mediation agencies.   

## 2922.101-4 Removal of items from contractor facilities affected by work stoppages.

Before initiating any action under FAR 22.101-4 for removal of items from contractors' facilities, the contracting officer must obtain legal advice from the Office of the Solicitor.   

## 2922.103-4 Approvals.

The “agency approving official” as identified in FAR 22.103-4(a) and (b) is a manager, supervisor, or executive responsible for the contracting officer's technical representative (see 2901.603-71).
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 78 Filed 04/18/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 78 Filed 04/18/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 78 Filed 04/18/2007 Page 3 of 3
From: Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US

To: "O’Hare, Andrew" <AOhare@cement.org> Date: 10/25/2010 02:14 PM Subject: RE: Cement Correction Notice I think I sent the wrong table. Here is the corrected version.

Steve Silverman and I discussed this issue with Hector. (W e called Hector because he was the first person to raise the issue and had already sent information). As a result of that conversation Steve and I believe this can be dealt with as more of an interpretative issue as to the meaning of calibration, and don't believe is would be a good idea to try and address this in the technical correction notice. Keith W . Barnett USEPA/OAQPS/SPPD/MMG Mail Code D243
- 02 Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 919
- 541
- 560 5 barnett.keith@epa.gov
# Subpart 1504.6 - Contract Reporting

**Parent topic:**PART 1504 - ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS

## 1504.670 [Reserved]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

 ______________________________

JEREMIAH W. GREEN *

Plaintiff, *

 v. * 2:06-CV-667-WKW

 

AJA ROBERTS *

Defendant. *

 ______________________________

ORDER ON MOTION

Upon consideration of the Motion to Strike Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiff’s Response

to Defendant’s Special Report, it is 

ORDERED that the motion (Doc. No. 45) be and is hereby DENIED. 

Done, this 7th day of February 2007.

 /s/Wallace Capel, Jr. 

WALLACE CAPEL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 47 Filed 02/07/2007 Page 1 of 1