alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 98.4 Analytical methods. ( a ) The majority of analytical methods used by the USDA laboratories to perform analyses of meat, meat food products and MREs are listed as follows: ( 1 ) Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL, Suite 500, 481 North Frederick Avenue, Gaithersburg, MD 20877-2417.
( 2 ) U.S. Army Individual Protection Directorate's Military Specifications, approved analytical test methods noted therein, U.S. Army Natick Research, Development and Engineering Center, Kansas Street, Natick, MA 01760-5017.
( b ) Additional analytical methods for these foods will be used, from time to time, as approved by the Director.
[58 FR 42445, Aug. 9, 1993, as amended at 61 FR 51353, Oct. 2, 1996]
§ 3430.202 Definitions. ( a ) The definitions applicable to the program under this subpart include: *Integrated project* means a project that incorporates the research and extension components of the agricultural knowledge system around a problem area or activity.
*Specialty crop* means fruits and vegetables, tree nuts, dried fruits, and horticulture and nursery crops (including floriculture).
*Trans-disciplinary* means a multi-discipline approach that brings biological and physical scientists together with economists and social scientists to address challenges in a holistic manner.
( b ) The following definitions apply to § 3430.209: *Citrus* means edible fruit of the family Rutaceae, including any hybrid of such fruits and products of such hybrids that are produced for commercial purposes in the United States.
*Citrus producer* means any person that is engaged in the domestic production and commercial sale of citrus in the United States.
[74 FR 45740, Sept. 4, 2009, as amended at 81 FR 6414, Feb. 8, 2016]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

RANDY A. HART,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 5:20cv281-TKW-MJF

SCOTT PAYNE and GULF

CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,

Defendants.

______________________________/

ORDER

This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 2). No objections were filed. Upon due consideration of 

the Report and Recommendation and the case file, I agree with the magistrate 

judge’s determination that this case should be dismissed pursuant to the “three 

strikes” statute, 28 U.S.C. §1915(g). Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by 

reference in this Order.

2. This case is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(g), and the 

Clerk shall close the file.

Case 5:20-cv-00281-TKW-MJF Document 3 Filed 12/02/20 Page 1 of 2
2

DONE and ORDERED this 2nd day of December, 2020.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:20-cv-00281-TKW-MJF Document 3 Filed 12/02/20 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3439 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3439

  To suspend temporarily the duty on 50/50 mixture of 1,3,5-Triazine-
   2,4,6(1H,3H,5H)-trione, 1,3,5-tris[(2R)-oxiranylmethyl]-(9Cl) and 
        1,3,5,-Triazine-2,4,6(1H,3H,5H)-trione, 1,3,5-tris[(2S)-
                         oxiranylmethyl]-(9Cl).

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 6, 2006

   Mr. Reid introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on 50/50 mixture of 1,3,5-Triazine-
   2,4,6(1H,3H,5H)-trione, 1,3,5-tris[(2R)-oxiranylmethyl]-(9Cl) and 
        1,3,5,-Triazine-2,4,6(1H,3H,5H)-trione, 1,3,5-tris[(2S)-
                         oxiranylmethyl]-(9Cl).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 50/50 MIXTURE OF 1,3,5-TRIAZINE-2,4,6(1H,3H,5H)-TRIONE, 
              1,3,5-TRIS[(2R)-OXIRANYLMETHYL]-(9CL) AND 1,3,5,-
              TRIAZINE-2,4,6(1H,3H,5H)-TRIONE, 1,3,5-TRIS[(2S)-
              OXIRANYLMETHYL]-(9CL).

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.29.12        50/50 mixture of 1,3,5- Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           Triazine-                                                         31/2009          ''
                           2,4,6(1H,3H,5H)-                                                                    .
                           trione, 1,3,5-
                           tris[(2R)-
                           oxiranylmethyl]-(9Cl)
                           and 1,3,5,-Triazine-
                           2,4,6(1H,3H,5H)-
                           trione, 1,3,5-
                           tris[(2S)-
                           oxirianylmethyl]-
                           (9Cl) (provided for
                           in subheading
                           2933.69.6050) (CAS
                           No. 240408-78-0 and
                           240408-81-5).........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR 

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

 NORTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA * 

 * 

 * 

v. * CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv736-WKW 

 * 

SEVENTY-FOUR THOUSAND SEVEN * 

HUNDRED DOLLARS ($74,700) * 

IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, * 

MOTION TO STRIKE FROM CONSIDERATION

ON TRIAL BY STIPULATION

 Comes now the Claimant moves the Court to strike from consideration, upon trial on 

the merits, the affidavit for search warrant and all references thereto, from the hearing on 

Motion to Suppress, and as grounds therefor says as follows: 

 1. That the case is submitted for trial upon the transcript of the hearing of 

Claimant's Motion to Suppress. 

 2. That certain hearsay evidence was admissible for purposes of the suppression 

hearing, but, as to the trial on the merits, is inadmissible. 

Respectfully submitted this the 29th day of October, 2007. 

 s/Bruce Maddox

Bruce Maddox (MAD013) 

Attorney for George Jones 

6728 Taylor Court 

Montgomery, Alabama 36117 

Phone: (334) 244-7333 

Fax: (334) 260-9600 

 

Case 2:06-cv-00736-WKW-SRW Document 39 Filed 10/29/2007 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 29th day of October, 2007, I electronically filed the 

foregoing with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification 

of such filing to appropriate parties. 

s/Bruce Maddox

Of Counsel 

 

Case 2:06-cv-00736-WKW-SRW Document 39 Filed 10/29/2007 Page 2 of 2
§ 1005.8 How does the Secretary provide states an opportunity to comment on proposed Federal financial assistance and direct Federal development? ( a ) Except in unusual circumstances, the Secretary gives state processes or directly affected State, areawide, regional and local officials and entities— ( 1 ) At least 30 days from the date established by the Secretary to comment on proposed Federal financial assistance in the form of noncompeting continuation awards; and
( 2 ) At least 60 days from the date established by the Secretary to comment on proposed direct Federal development or Federal financial assistance other than noncompeting continuation awards.
( b ) This section also applies to comments in cases in which the review, coordination, and communication with the Department have been delegated.
䐀 愀 琀 攀 一 吀 椀 洀 攀 㨀

开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 䰀 漀 挀 愀 琀 椀 漀 渀 㨀

开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 圀 椀 渀 搀 匀 瀀 攀 攀 搀 㨀

开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 洀 瀀 栀 圀 攀 愀 琀 栀 攀 爀 㨀

开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 䄀 椀 爀 挀 爀 愀 昀 琀 吀 礀 瀀 攀 㨀

开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 一 甀 洀 戀 攀 爀 漀 昀 䘀 氀 椀 最 栀 琀 猀 㨀

开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 䐀 甀 爀 愀 琀 椀 漀 渀 漀 昀 䘀 氀 椀 最 栀 琀 ⠀ 猀 ⤀ 㨀

开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 倀 䤀 䌀 㨀

开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 䜀 攀 渀 攀 爀 愀 氀 䌀 漀 渀 搀 椀 琀 椀 漀 渀 漀 昀 䄀 椀 爀 挀 爀 愀 昀 琀 㨀

开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 䴀 愀 砀 椀 洀 甀 洀 䄀 氀 琀 椀 琀 甀 搀 攀 䘀 氀 漀 眀 渀 㨀

开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 开 䜀 攀 渀 攀 爀 愀 氀 一 漀 琀 攀 猀 漀 渀 吀 愀 欀 攀 漀 昀 昀 Ⰰ 䘀 氀 椀 最 栀 琀 愀 渀 搀 䰀 愀 渀 搀 椀 渀 最 㨀
Case 3:06-cv-00698-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 1 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00698-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 2 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00698-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 3 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00698-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 4 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00698-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 5 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00698-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 6 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00698-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 7 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00698-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 8 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00698-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 9 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00698-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 10 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00698-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 11 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00698-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 12 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00698-SRW Document 1-2 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 3:06-cv-00698-SRW Document 1-3 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 1 of 8
Case 3:06-cv-00698-SRW Document 1-3 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 2 of 8
Case 3:06-cv-00698-SRW Document 1-3 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 3 of 8
Case 3:06-cv-00698-SRW Document 1-3 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 4 of 8
Case 3:06-cv-00698-SRW Document 1-3 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 5 of 8
Case 3:06-cv-00698-SRW Document 1-3 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 6 of 8
Case 3:06-cv-00698-SRW Document 1-3 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 7 of 8
Case 3:06-cv-00698-SRW Document 1-3 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 8 of 8
#### § 986.4 Blowouts.

*Blowouts* mean lightweight or underdeveloped inshell pecan nuts that are considered of lesser quality and market value.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-22-00491-CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding

97th District Court of Montague County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021-0355M-CV

Before Bassel, Birdwell, and Walker, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

IN RE WALLACE WAYNE BOWMAN, JR., Relator
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the 

opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus is denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered: December 14, 2022
#### In the Matter of John Paoli, Sr., Appellant, v Jody Paoli, Respondent.

[813 NYS2d 918]

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the petitioner appeals from (1) an order of the Family Court, Orange County (Klein, J.), dated November 24, 2004, which denied, without a hearing, his petition to modify a prior order of visitation, (2) an order of the same court dated November 23, 2004, which denied, without a hearing, his petition to adjudicate the respondent in contempt, and (3) an order of the same court, also dated November 23, 2004, which denied, without a hearing, his second petition to modify a prior order of visitation.

Ordered that the appeals are dismissed as academic, with costs.

Subsequent to the entry of the orders appealed from, the Family Court issued an order dated October 25, 2005, on the consent of the parties, which incorporated their most recent *805agreement resolving their custody and visitation issues. The order expressly stated that it superseded all of the prior orders of the Family Court. Accordingly, the appeals from the orders dated November 23, 2004 and the order dated November 24, 2004, must be dismissed as academic *(see Gillard-Holmes v Persico,*225 AD2d 519 [1996]). Schmidt, J.P., Crane, Krausman, Skelos and Lunn, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet dated March 31, 1998 and its
Consolidated Statement of Operations covering the period from October 1,
1997 to March 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statement and notes thereof.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           13413
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    83650
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    6749331
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         2838015
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1703393
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8829171
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        1273400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          5918
<OTHER-SE>                                     7151047
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   8829171
<SALES>                                        1405121
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1405121
<CGS>                                           535339
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   535339
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                821884
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               68211
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  60916
<INCOME-TAX>                                      3410
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              57506
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     57506
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
*Of the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.

United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 01-2671

IVP PHARMACEUTICAL CARE, INC.,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

TUFTS ASSOCIATED HEALTH PLANS, INC.,

Defendant, Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Morris E. Lasker,* U.S. District Judge]

Before

Boudin, Chief Judge,

Bownes, Senior Circuit Judge,

and Lipez, Circuit Judge.

Geoffrey S. Harper, with whom Lawrence K. Kalodney, Fish &

Richardson P.C. were on brief, for appellant.

James J. Marcellino, with whom Greg A. Friedholm and

McDermott, Will & Emery were on brief, for appellee.

August 12, 2002
-2-

PER CURIAM. We affirm. The district court has written

a comprehensive extensive opinion which correctly states the

relevant contract law of Massachusetts. There is no point in

restating what the district court has already said clearly and

correctly. We, therefore, adopt the district court opinion.
**********ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE********OF********LNR PARTNERS, LLC**********The  undersigned,  Job  Warshaw,  being  the  President  of  LNR  Partners,  LLC  (the  "Special Servicer"),  as  special  servicer  under  the  applicable  Pooling  and  Servicing  Agreement  for  the transactions  listed  on  Schedule  I  hereto,  hereby  certifies,  subject  to  any  limitations  listed  on Schedule I hereto, as of the date hereof, on behalf of the Special Servicer, solely in his capacity as an authorized officer of the Special Servicer and not in his individual capacity, as follows: 1.A  review  of  the  activities  performed  by  the  Special  Servicer  during  the  period commencing on January 1, 2014 and ending on December 31, 2014 (or any other shorter period set forth on Schedule I hereto) (the "Reporting Period"), and of the Special  Servicer's  performance  under  the  Pooling  and  Servicing  Agreement  has been made under my supervision; and 2.To  the  best  of  my  knowledge,  based  on  such  review  and  using  the  applicable servicing  criteria  under  Item  1122  of  Regulation  AB,  the  Special  Servicer  has fulfilled  all  of  its  obligations  under  the  applicable  Pooling  and  Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.   LNR PARTNERS, LLC, a Florida limited liability company By:____/s/ Job Warshaw________       Job Warshaw       President Dated:   February 23, 2015 **************Schedule I******CGCMT 2012-GC8 Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2012- GC8 17G5 Information Provider
<PAGE>   1
PART LL, ITEM 6, EXHIBIT II.

                               EGAN SYSTEMS, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


Computation of per share earnings:

The following data show the amounts used in computing earnings per share and the
effect on income (loss) and the weighted average number of shares of dilutive
potential common stock.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 Six Months Ended
                                                         --------------------------------
                                                             1999                1998
                                                         ------------        ------------
<S>                                                      <C>                 <C>
Income (loss) available to common stockholders
 used in primary EPS                                     $    179,699        $   (382,800)

Interest expense on convertible note payable                       --                 625
                                                         ------------        ------------

Income (loss) available to common stockholders
 after assumed conversions of dilutive securities        $    179,699        $   (382,175)
                                                         ============        ============

Weighted average number of common shares in
 primary EPS                                               18,646,652          16,941,652

Effect of dilutive securities                               5,061,000           4,463,300
                                                         ------------        ------------

Weighted average number of common shares and
 dilutive potential common stock used in
 fully diluted EPS                                         23,707,652          21,404,952
                                                         ============        ============

Net income (loss) per common share:

 Basic                                                   $       0.01        $      (0.02)
                                                         ============        ============

 Fully diluted                                           $       0.01        $      (0.02)
                                                         ============        ============
</TABLE>


For 1998, the effect of dilutive securities were not included in computing fully
diluted EPS because their effects are anti-dilutive.


                                       10
#### § 986.28 Pack.

*Pack* means to clean, grade, or otherwise prepare pecans for market as inshell or shelled pecans.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 335 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 335

              To reauthorize the Congressional Award Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 9, 2005

Mr. Lieberman (for himself, Ms. Collins, and Mr. Craig) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
               Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
              To reauthorize the Congressional Award Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE CONGRESSIONAL AWARD ACT.

    (a) Extension of Requirements Regarding Financial Operations of 
Congressional Award Program; Noncompliance With Requirements.--Section 
104(c)(2)(A) of the Congressional Award Act (2 U.S.C. 804(c)(2)(A)) is 
amended by striking ``and 2004'' and inserting ``2004, 2005, 2006, 
2007, 2008, and 2009''.
    (b) Termination.--
            (1) In general.--Section 108 of the Congressional Award Act 
        (2 U.S.C. 808) is amended by striking ``October 1, 2004'' and 
        inserting ``October 1, 2009''.
            (2) Savings provision.--During the period of October 1, 
        2004, through the date of the enactment of this section, all 
        actions and functions of the Congressional Award Board under 
        the Congressional Award Act (2 U.S.C. 801 et seq.) shall have 
        the same effect as though no lapse or termination of the Board 
        ever occurred.
    (c) Technical Amendments.--The Congressional Award Act is amended--
            (1) in section 103 (2 U.S.C. 803)--
                    (A) in subsection (a)(1) (B) and (C), by striking 
                ``a a local'' and inserting ``a local''; and
                    (B) in subsection (b)(3)(B), by striking 
                ``section'' each place it appears and inserting 
                ``subsection''; and
            (2) in section 104(c)(2)(A) (2 U.S.C. 804(c)(2)(A)), by 
        inserting a comma after ``1993''.
                                 <all>
```