alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Attention Deficit DisordersBehavior ProblemsClassroom EnvironmentClassroom TechniquesElementary Secondary EducationInclusive SchoolsIndividualized InstructionLearning DisabilitiesNeurological ImpairmentsSpecial Health ProblemsStudent CharacteristicsStudent Needs

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3268 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3268

 To suspend temporarily the duty on Butanedioic acid, dimethyl ester, 
    polymer with 4-hydroxy-2,2,6,6,-tetramethyl-1-piperidineethanol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 26, 2006

Mr. Frist (for Mrs. Dole) introduced the following bill; which was read 
             twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on Butanedioic acid, dimethyl ester, 
    polymer with 4-hydroxy-2,2,6,6,-tetramethyl-1-piperidineethanol.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BUTANEDIOIC ACID, DIMETHYL ESTER, POLYMER WITH 4-HYDROXY-
              2,2,6,6,-TETRAMETHYL-1-PIPERIDINEETHANOL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.10.47      Butanedioic acid,   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         dimethyl ester,                                                    31/2009
                         polymer with 4-
                         hydroxy-2,2,6,6,-
                         tetramethyl-1-
                         piperidineethanol
                         (CAS No. 65447-77-
                         0) (provided for
                         in subheading
                         3907.99.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-5375-N-49]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Juanita Perry, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 7262, Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 800-927-7588.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with the December 12, 1988 court order in                     *National Coalition for the Homeless*                     v.                     *Veterans Administration,*                     No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been determined suitable or unsuitable this week.                

Dated: December 9, 2010.

Mark R. Johnston,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.

[FR Doc. 2010-31365 Filed 12-16-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
rcar_ex1022.htm

EXHIBIT 10.22

 

 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE

 

This FIRST AMENDMENT DATED JANUARY 29, 2018 (this “Amendment”) to the Convertible Promissory Note dated February 23, 2017 (the “Promissory Note”). 

 

WHEREAS, the Borrower and the Payee are parties to a Loan Agreement dated February 23, 2017 (the “Loan Agreement”); 

 

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Loan Agreement the Borrower delivered the Promissory Note which is due and payable on February 28, 2018 (the “Maturity Date”); and

 

WHEREAS, the Loan Agreement was amended by Agreement dated January 29, 2018 (the “First Loan Agreement Amendment”) so as to extend the maturity date to December 31, 2019 and pursuant to which the Borrower agreed to deliver this Amendment. 

 

TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS AMENDMENT

 

1. AMENDMENT. The Promissory Note is hereby amended as follows: 

 

The third paragraph of the Promissory Note is deleted in its entirety and the following substituted in lieu thereof:

 

“The entire balance, interest and principal, will be payable on December 31, 2019 (the “Maturity Date”).”

 

2. CONSTRUCTION. Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms shall have the meanings set forth in the Loan Agreement and the Promissory Note, as the case may be. The terms of this Amendment amend and modify the Promissory Note. If there is any conflict between the terms, conditions and obligations of this Amendment and the Promissory Notes, this Amendment’s terms, conditions and obligations shall control. All other provisions of the Promissory Note not specifically modified by this Amendment are preserved and remain full force and effect.

 


	
RenovaCare, Inc. 
	
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Thomas Bold	
	
Name:
	Thomas Bold	 
	Title: 	President and Chief Executive Officer 	 



 

 


	
1
#### § 915.8 Grower.

*Grower* is synonymous with producer and means any person who produces avocados for market and who has a proprietary interest therein: *Provided,* That as used in § 915.22 the term grower shall include only those who have a proprietary interest in the production of 10 or more bearing avocado trees.

[19 FR 3439, June 11, 1954, as amended at 22 FR 3513, May 21, 1957. Redesignated at 26 FR 12751, Dec. 30, 1961]
#### § 989.129 Voting at nomination meetings.

Any person (defined in § 989.3 as an individual, partnership, corporation, association, or any other business unit) who is engaged, in a proprietary capacity, in the production of grapes which are sun-dried or dehydrated by artificial means to produce raisins and who qualifies under the provisions of § 989.29(b)(2) shall be eligible to cast one ballot for a nominee for each producer member position and one ballot for a nominee for each producer alternate member position on the committee which is to be filled for his district. Such person must be the one who or which: Owns and farms land resulting in his or its ownership of such grapes produced thereon; rents and farms land, resulting in his or its ownership of all or a portion of such grapes produced thereon; or owns land which he or it does not farm and, as rental for such land, obtains the ownership of a portion of such grapes or the raisins. In this connection, a partnership shall be deemed to include two or more persons (including a husband and wife) with respect to land the title to which, or leasehold interest in which, is vested in them as tenants in common, joint tenants, or under community property laws, as community property. In a landlord-tenant relationship, wherein each of the parties is a producer, each such producer shall be entitled to one vote for a nominee for each producer member position and one vote for each producer alternate member position. Hence, where two persons operate land as landlord and tenant on a share-crop basis, each person is entitled to one vote for each such position to be filled. Where land is leased on a cash rental basis, only the person who is the tenant or cash renter (producer) is entitled to vote. A partnership or corporation, when eligible, is entitled to cast only one vote for a nominee for each producer position to be filled in its district.

[83 FR 53972, Oct. 26, 2018]
§ 1002.12 Use of replicas, reproductions, and embossing seals. ( a ) The Secretary and his designees are authorized to affix replicas, reproductions, and embossing seals to appropriate documents, certifications, and other material for all purposes as authorized by this section.
( b ) Replicas may be used only for: ( 1 ) Display in or adjacent to DOE facilities, in Department auditoriums, presentation rooms, hearing rooms, lobbies, and public document rooms.
( 2 ) Offices of senior officials.
( 3 ) Official DOE distinguishing flags, adopted and utilized pursuant to subpart C.
( 4 ) Official awards, certificates, medals, and plaques.
( 5 ) Motion picture film, video tape and other audiovisual media prepared by or for DOE and attributed thereto.
( 6 ) Official prestige publications which represent the achievements or mission of DOE.
( 7 ) Non-DOE facilities in connection with events and displays sponsored by DOE, and public appearances of the Secretary or other designated senior DOE Officials.
( 8 ) For other such purposes as determined by the Director of the Office of Administrative Services.
( c ) Reproductions may be used only on: ( 1 ) DOE letterhead stationery.
( 2 ) Official DOE identification cards and security credentials.
( 3 ) Business cards for DOE employees.
( 4 ) Official DOE signs.
( 5 ) Official publications or graphics issued by and attributed to DOE, or joint statements of DOE with one or more Federal agencies, State or local governments, or foreign governments.
( 6 ) Official awards, certificates, and medals.
( 7 ) Motion picture film, video tape, and other audiovisual media prepared by or for DOE and attributed thereto.
( 8 ) For other such purposes as determined by the Director of the Office of Administrative Services.
( d ) Embossing seals may be used only on: ( 1 ) DOE legal documents, including interagency or intergovernmental agreements, agreements with States, foreign patent applications, and similar documents.
( 2 ) For other such purposes as determined by the General Counsel or the Director of Administration.
( e ) Any person who uses the official seal, replicas, reproductions, or embossing seals in a manner inconsistent with this part shall be subject to the provisions of 18 U.S.C. 1017, providing penalties for the wrongful use of an official seal, and to other provisions of law as applicable.
( f ) The official seal is being registered with the World Intellectual Property Organization through the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-41398

Summary Calendar

 

JAY TODD NEESE,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF

CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:95-CV-6

- - - - - - - - - -

January 27, 1999

Before KING, Chief Judge, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The respondent moves to supplement the state court record

with certified copies of the state habeas petition and its

supplement. IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED.

Jay Todd Neese, Texas inmate #349086, appeals the denial of

his federal habeas petition. He argues that the prosecution

breached the plea agreement in cause no. A-11,404 and that the

district court erred in according a presumption of correctness to

the state court findings of fact in denying his breached-plea-
No. 97-41398

-2-

agreement claim. The state trial court’s findings are supported

by the record. See Self v. Collins, 973 F.2d 1198, 1214 (5th

Cir. 1992). Neese fails to identify anything in the record which

indicates that the hearing was either unfair or failed to comply

with due process. The district court’s determination of the

breached-plea-agreement issue, based upon the presumption of

correctness accorded the state-court findings, was not erroneous. 

See Self v. Blackburn, 751 F.2d 789, 792-93 (5th Cir. 1985).

Neese argues that counsel rendered ineffective assistance on

appeal and that the district court erred in applying a procedural

bar to one aspect of his ineffective-assistance claim. Even

assuming that the district court erred in applying the procedural

bar, Neese cannot show that counsel’s performance was beyond the

broad range of reasonable performance. See Bryant v. Scott, 28

F.3d 1411, 1414 (5th Cir. 1994).

MOTION GRANTED. AFFIRMED.
Subpart 2944.1 - General

Parent topic: PART 2944 - SUBCONTRACTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

2944.101 Waiver.

The waiver of consent must be in writing, signed by the contracting officer, and included in the

contract file. The waiver must include all supporting facts, including the rationale for waiving the

consent to subcontract requirements.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DONNA BROWN, an individual; 

TIMOTHY BROWN, an individual, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

 v. 

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., FKA 

Wachovia Mortgage, FSB, FKA World 

Savings Bank, FSB, a corporation; 

Successor Wells Fargo Bank Southwest, 

N.A.,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 19-55064

D.C. No. 2:16-cv-00642-DMG-AGR

 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Dolly M. Gee, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 3, 2020**

Pasadena, California

Before: W. FLETCHER and LEE, Circuit Judges, and AMON,

*** District Judge.

Donna and Timothy Brown appeal the district court’s denial of leave to amend 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Carol B. Amon, United States District Judge for the 

Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.

FILED

JUN 26 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 

their complaint. We review the denial of a motion to amend for abuse of discretion. 

See Chodos v. W. Publ’g Co., 292 F.3d 992, 1003 (9th Cir. 2002). We affirm.

1. The Browns argue for the first time on appeal that Wells Fargo Bank, 

N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) acted as a “debt collector” under the Fair Debt Collection 

Practices Act (“FDCPA”) because it serviced the Browns’ mortgage loan on behalf 

of a securitized trust. Because this argument was not raised below, it has been 

waived on appeal. See In re Mercury Interactive Corp. Sec. Litig., 618 F.3d 988, 

992 (9th Cir. 2010) (“[A]n issue will generally be deemed waived on appeal if the 

argument was not raised sufficiently for the trial court to rule on it.”) (citations and 

internal quotation marks omitted).1

2. The Browns also now seek to add a state Rosenthal Act claim. But if a 

“party does not ask the district court for leave to amend, ‘the request on appeal to 

remand with instructions to permit amendment comes too late.’” Alaska v. United 

States, 201 F.3d 1154, 1163–64 (9th Cir. 2000) (quoting Jackson v. Am. Bar 

Ass’n, 538 F.2d 829, 833 (9th Cir. 1976)). Because the Browns did not seek leave 

1

 In any event, the FDCPA exempts activity that “concerns a debt which was not in 

default at the time it was obtained . . . .” 15 U.S.C. § 1692a(6)(F). It is undisputed 

that Wells Fargo obtained servicing rights to the Browns’ mortgage loan prior to any 

default. As a result, the Browns likely cannot pursue a FDCPA claim based on Wells 

Fargo’s reporting on the mortgage loan. See De Dios v. Int’l Realty & Invs., 641 

F.3d 1071, 1074–76 (9th Cir. 2011) (15 U.S.C. § 1692a(6)(F) precluded FDCPA 

claim against property management company retained before default to collect 

monthly payments). 
3 

of the district court to assert a Rosenthal Act claim, they cannot do so for the first 

time on appeal.

AFFIRMED.
Case 1:06-cv-00637-MHT-SRW Document 2 Filed 07/21/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00637-MHT-SRW Document 2 Filed 07/21/2006 Page 2 of 2
52.247-27 Contract Not Affected by Oral

Agreement.

As prescribed in 47.207-8(b), insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts for

transportation or for transportation-related services:

Contract Not Affected by Oral Agreement (Apr 1984)

No oral statement of any person shall modify or otherwise affect the terms, conditions, or

specifications stated in this contract. All modifications to the contract must be made in writing by

the Contracting Officer or an authorized representative.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.247 [Reserved]
Case 2:06-cv-00727-WKW-CSC Document 7 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00727-WKW-CSC Document 7 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 2 of 2
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 

 FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

 NORTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

) 

 v. ) Case No. 2:06-cr-0169-WHA 

) 

JAMES CALVIN TALLEY, ) 

 ) 

 Defendant. ) 

MOTION FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF COPY EXPENSE

 COMES NOW the defendant, James Calvin Talley, by and through the undersigned 

counsel, Richard K. Keith, and respectfully requests this Honorable Court to allow this 

indigent defendant to be reimbursed for expenses incurred when discovery was obtained in 

this matter. 

 As grounds in support thereof, the following is stated: 

1. Discovery in this sixteen (16) defendant case is voluminous and consists of: 1) 

7,428 paper copies; 2) 10 DVDs; 3) 19 CDs; 4) 1 floppy disc; 5) 6 VHS videos; 

and 6) 23 audio cassette tapes. 

2. The United States Attorney’s Office made discovery in this case available 

through the services of Pro Legal Copies of Montgomery, Inc. at the expense of 

the defendant. 

3. Defendant Talley obtained a complete set of discovery costing the undersigned a 

total of $1,234.35 (EXHIBIT A). 

 WHEREFORE, premises considered, Defendant respectfully requests this Honorable 

Court to issue an Order allowing him reimbursement for such copying expenses. 

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 129 Filed 03/16/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

 Respectfully submitted this 16th day of March, 2007. 

s/ Richard K. Keith 

RICHARD K. KEITH (KEI003)

Attorney for Defendant Talley 

KEITH & DUBIN, P.C.

22 Scott Street 

Montgomery, AL 36104-4012 

Telephone: (334) 264-6776 

Facsimile: (334) 265-5362 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on March 16, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing with the 

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to 

the following: 

A. Clark Morris, AUSA John T. Harmon, AUSA 

Post Office Box 197 Post Office Box 197 

Montgomery, AL 36101-0197 Montgomery, AL 36101-0197 

s/ Richard K. Keith 

OF COUNSEL 

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 129 Filed 03/16/2007 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

BARBARA M. JEFFERS, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) Case No. 3:06-cv-0685-WKW

) 

RUSSELL COUNTY BOARD OF )

EDUCATION, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the plaintiffs shall show cause in writing on or before

December 28, 2007, why Defendant Russell County Board of Education’s Motion to Amend

Answer (Doc. # 28) should not be granted.

DONE this 14th day of December, 2007.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 38 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 1 of 1
Subpart 617.1—Multiyear Contracting

Source: 64 FR 43624, Aug. 11, 1999, unless otherwise noted.

Parent topic: PART 617—SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS

617.104 General.

(b) The Procurement Executive is the agency head for the purpose of FAR 17.104(b).

617.105 Policy.

617.105-1 Uses.

(d) Every multiyear contract shall comply with FAR 17.104(c), unless an exception is approved

through the budget process in coordination with the cognizant financial management

office/comptroller.

617.108 Congressional notification.

(a) The Procurement Executive is the agency head for the purposes of FAR 17.108(a).
# Subpart 2901.0 - Scope of Subpart

**Parent topic:**PART 2901 - DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ACQUISITION REGULATION SYSTEM

## 2901.001 Scope of part.

This chapter may be referred to as the Department of Labor Acquisition Regulation or the DOLAR. This subpart sets forth introductory information about the Department of Labor Acquisition Regulation. This subpart explains the relationship of the DOLAR to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and explains the DOLAR's purpose, authority, applicability, exclusions, and issuance.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         800,596
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  375,350
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,228,402
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,533,987<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        1,273,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,666,895
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,228,402
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            25,817,782
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               25,009,934
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,353,902
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (546,054)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (546,054)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (575,491)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.26)
<FN>
<F1>Unclassified balance sheet
</FN>


</TABLE>