alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

OWEN J. ROGAL, D.D.S., P.C., )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06cv728-VPM

)

SKILSTAF, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER ON MOTION

Upon consideration of the Plaintiff’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission (Doc. #17) along

with the attached affidavit, filed on 1 September 2006, and it appearing that ROBERT E. COLE,

ESQ., is a member in good standing of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of

Pennsylvania, it is 

ORDERED that the motion be and the same is hereby GRANTED. 

DONE this7 day of September, 2006. th

/s/ Vanzetta Penn McPherson

VANZETTA PENN MCPHERSON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 18 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 18 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DIONA NICHOLS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 173 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 12th day of October, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
# Subpart 1353.1 - General

**Parent topic:**PART 1353 - FORMS

## 1353.100 Scope of subpart.

This subpart prescribes DOC forms that are supplemental to those provided in FAR Part 53.   

## 1353.107 Obtaining forms.

The DOC forms may be obtained from any DOC contracting office.
Subpart 337.1 - Service Contracts - General    **Parent topic:** PART 337 - SERVICE CONTRACTING - GENERAL337.103 Contracting officer responsibility.       (d)          (1)  			The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 352.237-70, Pro-Children Act, in solicitations, contracts, and orders that involve:          (i) Kindergarten, elementary, or secondary education or library services; or          (ii) Health or daycare services that are provided to children under the age of 18 on a routine or regular basis pursuant to the Pro-Children Act of 1994 (20 U.S.C. 6081-6084).          (2) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 352.237-71, Crime Control Act - Reporting of Child Abuse, in solicitations, contracts, and orders that require performance on Federal land or in a federally operated (or contracted) facility and involve the professions/activities performed by persons specified in the Crime Control Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 13031) including, but not limited to, teachers, social workers, physicians, nurses, dentists, health care practitioners, optometrists, psychologists, emergency medical technicians, alcohol or drug treatment personnel, child care workers and administrators, emergency medical technicians and ambulance drivers.          (3) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 352.237-72, Crime Control Act - Requirement for Background Checks, in solicitations, contracts, and orders that involve providing child care services to children under the age of 18, including social services, health and mental health care, child- (day) care, education (whether or not directly involved in teaching), and rehabilitative programs covered under the Crime Control Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 13041).          (4) Contracting officers supporting the Indian Health Service shall insert the clause at 352.237-73, Indian Child Protection and Family Violence Act in all solicitations, contracts, and orders when performance of the contract may involve regular contact with or control over Indian children. The required declaration shall also be included in Section J of the solicitation and contract.          (e) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 352.237-74, Non-Discrimination in Service Delivery, in solicitations, contracts, and orders to deliver services under HHS' programs directly to the public.          (f) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 352.237-75, Key Personnel, in solicitations and contracts when the contracting officer will require the contractor to designate contractor key personnel.
1425.003 Definitions.

Impracticable, as used in this subpart, includes reasons other than cost, and availability.

Manufacture, as used in this subpart, means completion of an end product in the form required to

meet specifications. It includes only direct incorporation of components into the end products to

alter the original material and establish the identity/character of the end product, and excludes

other supplies, materials, and requirements such as testing, manuals, related equipment, etc.

Parent topic: PART 1425 - FOREIGN ACQUISITION
#### § 987.27 Alternates.

An alternate for a member of the Committee shall act in the place and stead of such member during his absence or in the event of his removal, resignation, disqualification, or death, until a successor for such member's unexpired term has been selected and has qualified. In the event a member and his alternate are unable to attend a meeting of the Committee, such member or alternate, in that order, may designate an alternate from the group he represents to act in his place. If neither a member nor his alternate has designated an alternate as his replacement, or such designated alternate is unable to serve as the replacement, the chairman may, with the concurrence of a majority of the members including alternates acting as members, representing such group, designate an alternate from such group who is present at the meeting and is not acting as a member to act in the place and stead of the absent member.

[27 FR 6818, July 19, 1962, as amended at 36 FR 15038, Aug. 12, 1971; 43 FR 4251, Feb. 1, 1978]
309.470-1 Situations where reports are required.       The contracting officer shall report to the HCA and the Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary - Acquisition whenever the contracting officer -          (a) Knows or suspects that a contractor is committing or has committed any of the acts described in FAR 9.406-2 or 9.407-2; or          (b) Suspects a contractor is attempting to evade the prohibitions of debarment or suspension imposed under FAR 9.405, or any other comparable regulation, by changes of address, multiple addresses, formation of new companies, or by other devices.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 309.4 - Debarment, Suspension, and Ineligibility
#### § 993.83 Rights of the Secretary.

The members of the committee (including successors or alternates) and any agent or employee appointed or employed by the committee, shall be subject to the removal or suspension by the Secretary, in his discretion, at any time. Each and every decision, determination, or other acts of the committee shall be subject to the continuing right of the Secretary to disapprove of the same at any time, and upon such disapproval, shall be deemed null and void.
# Subpart 1427.2 - Patents and Copyrights

**Parent topic:**PART 1427 - PATENTS, DATA, AND COPYRIGHTS

## 1427.201 Patent and copyright infringement liability.

## 1427.201-2 Contract clauses.

Approval to exempt specific United States patents from the patent indemnity clause shall be obtained from the CCO with legal review and concurrence.   

## 1427.202 Royalties.

## 1427.202-3 Adjustment of royalties.

The CO shall report to the Assistant Solicitor for Acquisitions and Intellectual Property the results of any action taken in compliance with FAR 27.202-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                            1453
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   275000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (275000)
<INVENTORY>                                       7506
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                423394
<PP&E>                                           25462
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (10316)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  438540
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            91277
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         83
<COMMON>                                         67995
<OTHER-SE>                                    12030854
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    438540
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                389832
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (389841)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (800)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (390641)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (390641)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>
Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 2 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 3 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 4 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 5 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 6 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 7 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 8 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 9 of 9
**Exhibit 99.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350****AS ADDED BY****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of First Community Financial Corporation, (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the“Report”), I, James R. McLaughlin, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of theoperations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.

 

|               |   |      |
|--------------------|--------|-----------|
| Date: May 14, 2003 |   | By:  | /s/ JAMES R. MCLAUGLIN |
|               |   |      |  |
|               |   |      | **James R. McLaughlin, President & CEO** |
#### § 948.1 Secretary.

*Secretary* means the Secretary of Agriculture of the United States, or any officer or employee of the Department of Agriculture to whom authority has heretofore been delegated, or to whom authority hereafter may be delegated, to act in his stead.
#### § 993.106 In-line inspection.

*In-line inspection* means inspection of prunes where samples are drawn from a flow of prunes prior to packaging.
157 So.2d 230

#### CITY OF SHREVEPORT v. Tommy SANDERS.

No. 46932.

Nov. 12, 1963.

In re: City of Shreveport applying for writ of certiorari.

Writ refused. We find no error of law in the judgment complained of.
204-1 RULE 204 Applications - Adopted 4/28/72, Amended 5/2/96

Every application for a permit required under Rule 201 shall be filed in the manner and form prescribed by the Control Officer, and shall give all the information necessary to enable the
Control Officer to make the determ ination required by Rule 208 hereof.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) CASE NUMBER: 2:06-CR-00202-WKW

)

EUGENE L. CLECKLER )

DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF APPEAL

COMES NOW the defendant, Eugene L. Cleckler, and hereby provides

notice of appeal to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

1291 and 18 U.S.C. 3742, from his June 29, 2007, sentencing. 

Respectfully submitted this the 5 day of July, 2007. th

 

s/ Ronald R, Brunson 

RONALD R. BRUNSON 1696

ATTORNEY FOR EUGENE L. CLECKLER

4379 Boulder Lake Circle

Birmingham, Alabama 35242

(205) 967-6242

Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 111 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on July 5th, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing with

the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of

such filing to the following:

Andrew O. Schiff, Esq., Assistant U.S. Attorney

201 One Court Square

Post Office Box 197

Montgomery, AL 36101-0197

Andrew.schiff@usdoj.gov, Debbie.shaw@usdoj.gov

s/ Ronald R, Brunson 

 RONALD R. BRUNSON

Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 111 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 2 of 2
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**492 CA 15-01234** 
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, DEJOSEPH, CURRAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

CITIMORTGAGE, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KIP C. CARTER, SALLY ANN CARTER, ALSO KNOWN AS SALLY ANN M. CARTER, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

DAVIDSON FINK LLP, ROCHESTER (LARRY T. POWELL OF COUNSEL), FOR
PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

Appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (James P. Murphy, J.), entered June 18, 2014. The order and judgment dismissed the complaint.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order and judgment so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the complaint is reinstated.

Memorandum: In this mortgage foreclosure action, plaintiff appeals from an order and judgment, issued sua sponte, dismissing the complaint without prejudice based on plaintiff’s failure to meet a single court-ordered deadline for filing a motion for a judgment of foreclosure. We reverse. Supreme Court erred in dismissing the complaint sua sponte “inasmuch as ‘[u]se of the [sua sponte] power of dismissal must be restricted to the most extraordinary circumstances’ ” ( BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP v Maestri , 134 AD3d 1593, 1593), such as “a pattern of willful noncompliance with court-ordered deadlines,” and no such extraordinary circumstances are reflected in the record before us ( Bank of Am., N.A. v Bah , 95 AD3d 1150, 1152; see NYCTL 2008-A Trust v Estate of Locksley Holas , 93 AD3d 650, 651; U.S. Bank, N.A. v Guichardo , 90 AD3d 1032, 1033). “Although ‘a litigant cannot ignore court orders with impunity’ . . . , we conclude that missing a single deadline by one week does not ‘warrant the court’s exercise of its power to dismiss a complaint sua sponte’ ” ( Citimortgage, Inc. v Petragnani , 137 AD3d 1688, ___).

Entered: June 10, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
#### In the Matter of Liquidation of American Druggists’ Insurance Company. Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York, Respondent, v Denis D. Kenny, Appellant.

Submitted March 12, 2007;

decided July 2, 2007

Reported below, 15 AD3d 268.

Motion for leave to appeal from the February 5, 2007 “Stipulation of Discontinuance with Prejudice,” dismissed upon the ground that that paper does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; the December 6, 2006 judgment of Supreme Court is the final paper in this action and a motion for leave to appeal from that judgment , would be untimely *(see*CPLR 5513 [b]).
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 9-2 Filed 09/26/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 9-2 Filed 09/26/2006 Page 2 of 2
§ 981.473 Redetermination reports. Each handler shall furnish for use by the Board in redetermination of the kernel weight of almonds received for his own account and for marketing policy considerations, the information listed and described in this section. Such information shall be reported within the applicable times specified in § 981.73 on forms provided by the Board. ( a ) *Handler carryover.* Report the weight of all almonds, whether unshelled or shelled, wherever located, held by the handler for the handler's own account, whether or not sold.
( b ) *Delivered sales.* Report the weight of salable almonds sold and delivered (shipments), showing the weight, and whether unshelled or shelled, including those disposed of pursuant to the requirements for reserve disposition, or used in almond products.
( c ) *Transfers.* A report of almonds transferred to another handler showing the weight of each lot transferred, whether unshelled or shelled.
( d ) *Remaining inedible obligation.* Report the quantity of almonds the handler intends to deliver to Board approved outlets to meet the disposition obligation pursuant to § 981.42(a).
[42 FR 19322, Apr. 13, 1977, as amended at 42 FR 56488, Oct. 26, 1977; 58 FR 34696, June 29, 1993]
622.1503 Procedures for acquiring end products on the List of Products Requiring Contractor Certification as to Forced or Indentured Child Labor.       (e) The contracting officer shall refer to the DOS Inspector General for Investigation any instances where the contracting officer has reason to believe that forced or indentured child labor was used to mine, produce, or manufacture an end product furnished pursuant to a contract awarded subject to the certification required in FAR 22.1503(c).    **Parent topic:** Subpart 622.15—Prohibition of Acquisition of Products Produced by Forced or Indentured Child Labor
#### Souveran Fabrics Corp., Respondent, v. Virginia Fibre Corporation, Appellant.

Order entered August 1, 1968, reversed on the law and in the exercise of discretion, with $30 costs and disbursements- to the appellant, and motion to vacate the demand for .bill of -particulars granted. Defendant should not .be required to detail in a bill of particulars the statutes and decisional law upon which it relies. (See *Gevinson*v. *Kirkeby-Natus Corp.,*26 A D 2d 71) Since the court is required to take judicial notice of ¡the law of New York without evidence to establish it (Richardson, Evidence [9th ed.], § 7) the defendant need not particularize the provisions of such law. Concur—Capozzoli, J. P., Tilzer, ■Markewich,.Nunez and McNally, JJ.
#### § 986.49 Acceptance.

Each person to be selected by the Secretary as a member or as an alternate member of the Council shall, prior to such selection, qualify by advising the Secretary that if selected, such person agrees to serve in the position for which that nomination has been made.
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

36 38 40 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 06/01 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 01 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 30411

DAVID WEDGE,

Plaintiff

- Appellant

v. CAJUN DEEP FOUNDATIONS, L.L.C.,

Defendant

- Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:13

- CV

- 1257

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, and BARKSDALE, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: * Cajun Deep Foundations, L.L.C. , was awarded summary judgment on David Wedge’s Jones Act claim under 46 U.S.C § 30104 et seq

. Wedge claim s he showed he is entitled to seaman status

. Chandris, Inc. v. Latsis , 515 U.S. 347, 354 (1995); see also 46 U.S.C § 30104

. Having reviewed the briefs, the record, and the applicable law, and essentially for the reasons stated by the district court,

* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 10, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-30411 Document: 00512864207 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/10/2014No. 14

- 30411 Wedge v. Cajun Deep Foundations, L.L.C. , No. 13

- 1257, 2014 WL 1329830 (E.D.
La. 2014 ), the judgment is AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 14-30411 Document: 00512864207 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/10/2014
1436.603 Collecting data on and appraising

firms' qualifications.

HCAs who require architect-engineer services shall use their established procedures to collect data

on and appraising firms' qualifications.

Parent topic: Subpart 1436.6 - Architect-Engineer Services
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 4356

_____________________________
T IMOTHY T HOMAS , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for D uval County

. Linda F. McCallum , Judge

. December 19, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
R OWE , B ILBREY , and W INSOR , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Timothy Thomas, pro se
, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
1642.7001 Management agreement.       When it is in the best interest of FEHBP enrollees to continue a contract for an interim period after the carrier discontinues its operations and has entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement (or other descriptive term), but before a successor in interest has been recognized by OPM, the carrier may submit for OPM approval a Management Agreement that enables it to continue a contract through an agreement with a third party to administer the day-to-day performance of the contract. Examples of situations in which a Management Agreement may be accepted by OPM are:          (a) When a transfer of assets does not meet the criteria for a novation;          (b) While a request for a novation is pending;          (c) While awaiting a decision on a request for a novation;          (d) As an interim measure, when the timing of a transfer of assets or the timing of a carrier's withdrawal make administration of the contract inconvenient;          (e) When it is not in the interests of the Government to either recognize a successor in interest or to immediately terminate the existing FEHBP contract.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1642.70—Management Agreement (in Lieu of Novation Agreement)