alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
215.404-4 Profit.       (b)  *Policy.*          (1)  Contracting officers shall use a structured approach for developing a prenegotiation profit or fee objective on any negotiated contract action when certified cost or pricing data is obtained, except for cost-plus-award-fee contracts (see                 215.404-74             ,                 216.405-2             , and FAR 16.405-2) or contracts with Federally Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDCs) (see                 215.404-75             ).  There are three structured approaches—          (A)  The weighted guidelines method;          (B)  The modified weighted guidelines method; and          (C)  An alternate structured approach.          (c)  *Contracting officer responsibilities.*          (1)  Also, do not perform a profit analysis when assessing cost realism in competitive acquisitions.          (2)  When using a structured approach, the contracting officer—          (A)  Shall use the weighted guidelines method (see                 215.404-71             ), except as provided in paragraphs (c)(2)(B) and (c)(2)(C) of this subsection.          (B)  Shall use the modified weighted guidelines method (see                 215.404-72             ) on contract actions with nonprofit organizations other than FFRDCs.          (C)  May use an alternate structured approach (see                 215.404-73             ) when—          *(1)*  The contract action is—          *(i)*  At or below the certified cost or pricing data threshold (see FAR 15.403-4(a)(1));          *(ii)*  For architect-engineer or construction work;          *(iii)*  Primarily for delivery of material from subcontractors; or          *(iv)*  A termination settlement; or          *(2)*  The weighted guidelines method does not produce a reasonable overall profit objective and the head of the contracting activity approves use of the alternate approach in writing.          (D)  Shall use the weighted guidelines method to establish a basic profit rate under a formula-type pricing agreement, and may then use the basic rate on all actions under the agreement, provided that conditions affecting profit do not change.          (E)  Shall document the profit analysis in the contract file.          (5)  Although specific agreement on the applied weights or values for individual profit factors shall not be attempted, the contracting officer may encourage the contractor to—          (A)  Present the details of its proposed profit amounts in the weighted guidelines format or similar structured approach; and          (B)  Use the weighted guidelines method in developing profit objectives for negotiated subcontracts.          (6)  The contracting officer must also verify that relevant variables have not materially changed (e.g., performance risk, interest rates, progress payment rates, distribution of facilities capital).          (d)  *Profit-analysis factors.*          (1)  *Common factors.*  The common factors are embodied in the DoD structured approaches and need not be further considered by the contracting officer.    **Parent topic:** 215.404 Proposal analysis.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 106 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 106

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Rules in the One 
                        Hundred Ninth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 16, 2005

  Mr. Dreier (for himself and Ms. Slaughter) submitted the following 
resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Rules in the One 
                        Hundred Ninth Congress.

    Resolved, 

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on Rules (hereafter in this 
resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including the expenses of 
all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts 
of the House of Representatives for committee salaries and expenses, 
not more than $6,365,600 for the One Hundred Ninth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $3,176,144 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2005, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2006; and
            (2) not more than $3,189,456 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2006, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2007.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
#### DORN, Respondent, v. ERIE R. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

July 7, 1914.)

Action by Ellen B. Dorn against the Erie Railroad Company.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
# .. 17S. 8th, P.O. Box 91.0

Miles City, MT 59301 August 22, 2013 

## CITY OF 

## MIDESEitH;TV

.,"ll,'Ut 

### 'R' II (If H-.j t, -,

_••••

' •••• I " •• ' ••••• ' •



### .~~CKET OPERATIONS ZCIJ AUG30 A ~: 

### I 0 Telephone: (406) 234-3462

( Mr. Dennis DeVany 

### U. S. DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPORATION Office ofthe Secretary Washington, D. C. RE: ESSENTIAL Am SERVICE FOREASTERN MONTANAj WITHDRAWAL OFPETITION FORREGONSIDERATION '" , Dear Mr. DeVany: The purpose ofthis letter is to formally withdraw the City ofMiles City 's Petition for Reconsideration, dated July 2, 2013, regarding Order 2013-6-13. Subsequent to our submission of such Petition, the matter has been more fully discussed and revi~ed with the Department ofTransportation, with the office of Senator Max Baucus and with other" communities in situations similar to ours, We have come to the conclusion that even more investigation is warranted; hence the withdrawal, which we believe is for the good ofour community atthis time. Our community is still very interested inpreserving essential air service for eastern Montana, and may petition the Department ofTransportation at a later date. The City ofMiles City thanks you for your consideration ofthis matter and willingness to work.with this community
.

./ Yours Truly, THE CITY OF MILES CITY 

# x(24~ C.A. GRENZ, Mayor
§ 981.466 Almond butter. Almond butter as used in § 981.66(c) is hereby defined as a comminuted food product prepared by grinding shelled or blanched almonds into a homogeneous plastic or semiplastic mass or liquid having very few particles larger than 1 ⁄ 16 inch in any dimension. To produce chunky style almond butter, almond chunks or pieces may be added up to a maximum of 25 percent by weight of the finished product. The size of the almond pieces used to make chunky style almond butter may not exceed 5 ⁄ 16 inch in any dimension. [48 FR 11250, Mar. 17, 1983] Effective Date Note
At 88 FR 67627, Oct. 2, 2023, §§981.466 was stayed indefinitely.
# SUBCHAPTER E - GENERAL CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS

- PART 1028 - BONDS AND INSURANCE 
- PART 1032 - CONTRACT FINANCING 
- PART 1033 - PROTESTS, DISPUTES, AND APPEALS 

- PART 1028 - BONDS AND INSURANCE    - Subpart 1028.3 - Insurance     - 1028.307   Insurance under cost-reimbursement contracts.
    - 1028.307-1   Group insurance plans.
    - 1028.310   Contract clause for work on a Government installation.
    - 1028.310-70   Agency contract clause for work on a Government installation.
    - 1028.311   Solicitation provision and contract clause on liability insurance under cost reimbursement contracts.
    - 1028.311-2   Agency solicitation provisions and contract clauses.
- PART 1032 - CONTRACT FINANCING    - Subpart 1032.1 - Non-Commercial Item Purchase Financing     - 1032.113   Customary contract financing.
  - Subpart 1032.2 - Commercial Item Purchase Financing     - 1032.202   General.
    - 1032.202-1   Policy.
  - Subpart 1032.7 - Contract Funding     - 1032.770   Incremental funding during a Continuing Resolution.
    - 1032.770-1   Scope of section.
    - 1032.770-2   Definition.
    - 1032.770-3   General.
    - 1032.770-4   Policy.
    - 1032.770-5   Limitations.
    - 1032.770-6   Procedures.
    - 1032.770-7   Clause.
  - Subpart 1032.70 - Electronic Submission and Processing of Payment Requests     - 1032.7000   Scope of subpart.
    - 1032.7001   Definitions.
    - 1032.7002   Policy.
    - 1032.7003   Contract clause.
- PART 1033 - PROTESTS, DISPUTES, AND APPEALS    - Subpart 1033.2 - Disputes and Appeals     - 1033.201   Definitions.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

GREAT SOUTHERN WOOD )

PRESERVING, INC., )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06cv708-CSC

)

AMERICAN HOME )

ASSURANCE CO. et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

 Upon consideration of the defendants’ motion for a continuance (Doc. No. 30), it is

ORDERED that oral argument on the motion for summary judgment be and is hereby

RESET from August 3, 2007, to August 14, 2007, at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 4B, United

States Courthouse Complex, One Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama.

Done this 27th day of July, 2007.

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00708-CSC Document 31 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 1 of 1
IV 

House Calendar No. 239 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1046 

[Report No. 109–691] 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 

consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2006 

Mr. PUTNAM, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with 

respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported 

from the Committee on Rules. 

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule 

2 XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the 

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to 

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported on the legislative day of September 28, 2006, pro6 viding for consideration or disposition of any of the fol7 lowing measures: 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS
2 

HRES 1046 RH 

1 (1) A bill to authorize trial by military commis2 sion for violations of the law of war, and for other 

3 purposes. 

4 (2) A bill to update the Foreign Intelligence 

5 Surveillance Act of 1978. 

6 (3) A conference report to accompany the bill 

7 (H.R. 5441) making appropriations for the Depart8 ment of Homeland Security for the fiscal year end9 ing September 30, 2007, and for other purposes. 

10 SEC. 2. House Resolutions 654 and 767 are laid upon 

11 the table. 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS

jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 239 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1046 

[Report No. 109

–691] 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII 

tions reported from the Committee on Rules. with respect to consideration of certain resoluSEPTEMBER 27, 2006 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

OWEN J. ROGAL, D.D.S., P.C., 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

SKILSTAF, INC., 

 Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

 CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06-cv-00728-VPM 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

Charles A. Stewart III, Amelia T. Driscoll, and the law firm of Bradley Arant Rose & 

White LLP, hereby give notice of appearance as counsel for Skilstaf, Inc., the Defendant in this 

cause, and ask that the Court and Plaintiff serve them with copies of all pleadings, orders, 

discovery, and other documents at the below address: 

Charles A. Stewart III 

Bradley Arant Rose & White LLP 

The Alabama Center for Commerce 

401 Adams Avenue, Suite 780 

Montgomery, AL 36104 

Amelia Driscoll (DRI016) 

Bradley Arant Rose & White LLP 

One Federal Place 

1819 Fifth Avenue North 

Birmingham, AL 35203 

Dated this the 21st day of August, 2006. 

Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 15 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Amelia T. Driscoll 

Amelia T. Driscoll (DRI016) (asb-0276-a32t) 

Bradley Arant Rose & White LLP 

One Federal Place 

1819 Fifth Avenue North 

Birmingham, AL 35203 

Phone: (205)521-8000 

Fax: (205)521-8800 

Email: adriscoll@bradleyarant.com

Charles A. Stewart, III (STE067) (asb-4955-a56c) 

Bradley Arant Rose & White LLP

The Alabama Center for Commerce 

401 Adams Avenue, Suite 780 

Montgomery, AL 36104 

Telephone: (334) 956-7700 

Facsimile: (334) 956-7701 

Email: cstewart@bradleyarant.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Skilstaf, Inc. 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 21, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with the 

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to the 

following: 

Robert E. Cole 

437 Chestnut Street, Suite 218 

Philadelphia, PA 19109 

Beth A. Friel 

Jeanne L. Bakker 

Mongtomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads 

123 South Broad Street 

Philadelphia, PA 19109 

and I hereby certify that I have mailed by U. S. Postal Service the document to the following 

non-CM/ECF participants: None. 

/s/ Amelia T. Driscoll (DRI016) 

1/1353304.1 

Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 15 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 2 of 2
52.246-11 Higher-Level Contract Quality

Requirement.

As prescribed in 46.311 , insert the following clause:

Higher-Level Contract Quality Requirement (Dec 2014)

(a) The Contractor shall comply with the higher-level quality standard(s) listed below.

______________________________________________________[Contracting Officer insert the title, number (if

any), date, and tailoring (if any) of the higher-level quality standards.]

(b) The Contractor shall include applicable requirements of the higher-level quality standard(s)

listed in paragraph (a) of this clause and the requirement to flow down such standards, as

applicable, to lower-tier subcontracts, in-

(1) Any subcontract for critical and complex items (see 46.203(b) and (c)); or

(2) When the technical requirements of a subcontract require-

(i) Control of such things as design, work operations, in-process control, testing, and inspection; or

(ii) Attention to such factors as organization, planning, work instructions, documentation control,

and advanced metrology.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.246 [Reserved]
Order entered December 13, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00571-CR

LAZARO SANTIAGO VELEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F12-52451-Q

ORDER

After the Court granted two extensions of time, appellant’s brief was due November 28, 

2016. To date, the brief has not been filed and the Court has had no communication with 

appellant counsel.

Therefore, the Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why 

appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings 

and recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether 

appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the 

trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 

(Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is 
ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which 

may include appointment of new counsel.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include 

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this 

order.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The 

appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are 

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
#### Gurdhian Singh, Appellant, v Jon Friedson et al., Respondents.

Submitted June 11, 2007;

decided July 2, 2007

Reported below, 36 AD3d 605.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
### c\o^\- ofAffeAts

___ .f^cf.A/ ftob4iV ^txA5 18*114 ^U^u^il

are. £o\W*$ mc 4» mt1 f)eco tW-fc, ct^ of t^u4 ao«^ X £W4- \aa^~ /n^i /^-ecjAJ j>Aft6a%b. X t^A6 Stvd^ a4~ 4r/WSte*'f "far 

### fir A- 4d of^ IrKre-i J~ Uv^K To**. LU4*J 4^ /fl^k?>(&*5~ 

### 4"t7 -p'^iXx Ho^ Cc^rv #e4 me S^e fn.g^ -Une.4i'« >£ q^f~^


### -fV D *mX. X n^ 4° fi U. tn^ /Vpp^ot( XP c^u o^j key ./V1I7- x ^„D.\ *^» xv..« X^-TM^ 1" -, 'i.',„ _, ... P_/-J-,,/ K^^> X Q-g-gJ Mdrt TV/**- "V0"T«l<-> 1^ Uy^m'ftA^ ^^ /n^f fro/kA^ I 7/JMk Hop,

Z/cu> Jlwvid) <ftRECEIVED IN COURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS JAN 2 0 2015 fltEEHN

— AheTAoosfa, Clerk COURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS JAN 26 2015-AbeUcosterCleikJ.Z)U-
H. Res. 139

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

March 8, 2005.

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and he

is hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the

House of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS: Mr. Burton of Indiana to rank after Mr. Stearns.

Attest:

Clerk.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Public Health Service

USTED

PUEDE

USTED

PUEDE
Prepárese

Obtenga Obtenga 

medicamentos medicamentos

Busque ayuda Busque ayuda

Siga con su Siga con su 

resolución esolución

Llame gratis al: 

1-877-44U-QUIT

Fije una fecha para

dejar de fumar.

Déjelo para siempre.

Hable con su doctor.

FECHA

USTED

PUEDE
SUBCHAPTER F - SPECIAL CATEGORIES OF

CONTRACTING

PART 1034 - MAJOR SYSTEM ACQUISITION

PART 1036 - CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS

PART 1034 - MAJOR SYSTEM ACQUISITION

Subpart 1034.0 - General

1034.001 Definitions.

1034.004 Acquisition strategy.

PART 1036 - CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS

Subpart 1036.6 - Architect-Engineer Services

1036.602-5 Short selection process for contracts not to exceed the simplified

acquisition threshold.
EXHIBIT 32.2 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b)



In connection with the Quarter Report of Gallery of History, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Rod Lynam, Chief Financial Office of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

1.	 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presented, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Rod Lynam
-------------
Rod Lynam
Chief Financial Officer

February 13, 2004




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Federal Register: April 9, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 68)]
[Notices]               
[Page 18252]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr09ap10-141]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6952]

 
U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy; Notice of Meeting

    The U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy will hold a public 
meeting on April 23, 2010, at the University of Southern California 
Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism, Room ASC 207, 
Geoffrey Cowan Forum. Address: 3502 Watt Way, Los Angeles, CA 90089. 
The meeting will begin at 9:30 a.m. and conclude at 11:30 a.m. The 
Commissioners will discuss public diplomacy issues, including 
measurement of U.S. government public diplomacy efforts.
    The Advisory Commission was originally established under Section 
604 of the United States Information and Exchange Act of 1948, as 
amended (22 U.S.C. 1469) and Section 8 of Reorganization Plan Numbered 
2 of 1977. It was reauthorized pursuant to Public Law 111-70 (2009), 22 
U.S.C. 6553.
    The Advisory Commission is a bipartisan panel created by Congress 
to assess public diplomacy policies and programs of the U.S. government 
and publicly funded nongovernmental organizations. The Commission 
reports its findings and recommendations to the President, the Congress 
and the Secretary of State and the American people. Current Commission 
members include William Hybl, who is the Chairman; Jay Snyder of New 
York; Penne Korth Peacock of Texas; Lyndon Olson of Texas; John Osborn 
of Pennsylvania; and Lezlee Westine of Virginia.
    Seating at this meeting is limited. To attend and for more 
information, please contact Carl Chan at (202) 632-2823. E-mail: 
chanck@state.gov.
    This announcement might appear in the Federal Register less than 15 
days prior to the meeting. The Department of State finds that there is 
an exceptional circumstance in that the University of Southern 
California was not able to confirm this meeting until the morning of 
April 5th. This Notice was published as soon as possible after that 
confirmation.

    Dated: April 5, 2010.
Carl Chan,
Executive Director, ACPD.
[FR Doc. 2010-8140 Filed 4-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-45-P
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 982

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 61 FR 17559, Apr. 22, 1996.

#### § 982.82 Separability.

If any provision of this subpart is declared invalid, or the applicability thereof to any person, circumstance, or thing is held invalid, the validity of the remainder of this subpart or the applicability thereof to any other person, circumstance, or thing shall not be affected thereby.
# 916.601 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**Subpart 916.6 - Time and Materials, Labor Hour, and Letter Contracts
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

LUMBERMAN'S UNDERWRITING )

ALLIANCE, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

v. ) CASE NO. 3:06-cv-645-MEF

)

EMORY LEE YOUNG, )

)

Defendant. )

O R D E R

It is hereby ORDERED that a status conference will be held on February 2, 2007 at

8:30 A.M. by conference call arranged by counsel for the plaintiffs.

DONE this the 26th day of January, 2007.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00645-MEF-TFM Document 12 Filed 01/26/2007 Page 1 of 1