alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          16,388
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 3,709
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     79,650
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        203,998
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,359
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 314,655
<DEPOSITS>                                     267,797
<SHORT-TERM>                                     4,676
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,802
<LONG-TERM>                                      6,439
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           178
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,763
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 314,655
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 14,904
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                4,011
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   309
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                19,224
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               7,910
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,432
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           10,792
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,417
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  42
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  8,316
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,823
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,823
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,614
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.04
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.68
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,950
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 11,808
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,005
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,993
<RECOVERIES>                                       930
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,359
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,417
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1903
BARBARA S. MINNICH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHN M. DEUTCH, Director, Central Intelligence Agency, Defendant - Appellee.

No. 96-2152
BARBARA S. MINNICH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHN M. DEUTCH, Director, Central Intelligence Agency, Defendant - Appellee.

No. 96-2153
BARBARA S. MINNICH, Plaintiff - Appellant,23 versus JOHN M. DEUTCH, Director, Central Intelligence Agency, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-96-266-A, CA-96-664-A) Submitted: March 27, 1997 Decided: April 2, 1997 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Barbara S. Minnich, Appellant Pro Se. Rachel Celia Ballow, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).4 PER CURIAM:In these consolidated cases, Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief in her actions against the Central Intelligence Agency. We have reviewed the records and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error.In Appeal No. 96-1903, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Minnich v. Deutch , No. CA-96-266-A (E.D. Va. May 24, 1996). In Appeal Nos. 96-2152 and 96-2153, the district court denied relief for the reasons stated from the bench. Appellant failed to provide a transcript of the hearing at which the district court stated the reasons for denying relief. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b)(2); Powell v. Estelle , 959 F.2d 22, 26 (5th Cir. 1992). Moreover, Appellant has failed to state a substantial claim justifying preparation of a transcript at government expense. 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) (1994). Consequently, in Nos. 96-2152 and 96-2153, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 64 Filed 08/15/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 64 Filed 08/15/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 64 Filed 08/15/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 64 Filed 08/15/2007 Page 4 of 4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

 EASTERN DIVISION

CLIFFORD ALSTON, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 3:06-cv-722-WKW

)

CHRISTOPHER ASKEW, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the parties shall file a report on or before October 12, 2007, informing

the court of the status of mediation. 

DONE this 4th day of October, 2007.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00722-WKW-TFM Document 33 Filed 10/04/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### Sisalcords do Brazil Ltd., Respondent, v. Fiacao Brasileira de Sisal, S. A., Appellant.

Order, entered January 14, 1970, unanimously reversed, on the law, on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, vacated, the motion for renewal of application for vacatur of default judgment granted, and motion to vacate and set aside default judgment granted on condition, however, that the defendant shall pay to plaintiff the sum of $500 costs, to be paid within 20 days of date of entry of order hereon, and pay also the $30 costs and disbursements of this appeal which are awarded to plaintiff, *779such costs to be paid within 20 days from time of taxation thereof; and on further condition that defendant shall serve its answer within 20 days of date of entry of order hereon. In the event of a failure of compliance with the aforesaid conditions, the motion to vacate the default shall be denied and the judgment shall stand. Appeal, insofar as taken from order entered November 24, 1969, unanimously dismissed, without costs and without disbursements, as academic. The record discloses substantial issues involving the merits of plaintiff’s alleged claims and, although we conclude that defendant has failed to satisfactorily explain its failure to timely answer the complaint, the default was of comparatively short duration and the defendant should be given an opportunity to defend upon compliance with the aforesaid terms and conditions. Concur — Eager, J. P., Capozzoli, Markewich and Nunez, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000760386
<NAME> WELLESLEY LEASE INCOME LIMITED PARTNERSHIP III-D

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         283,692
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,461
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               300,882
<PP&E>                                       2,649,680
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,958,575
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 991,987
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           62,645
<BONDS>                                         55,116
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        8,988,039
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (8,113,813)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   991,987
<SALES>                                        437,755
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               469,377
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,305
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               380,006
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (938)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,328
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 52,676
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             52,676
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    52,676
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
§ 1042.515 Compensation. A recipient shall not make or enforce any policy or practice that, on the basis of sex: ( a ) Makes distinctions in rates of pay or other compensation;
( b ) Results in the payment of wages to employees of one sex at a rate less than that paid to employees of the opposite sex for equal work on jobs the performance of which requires equal skill, effort, and responsibility, and that are performed under similar working conditions.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Cleo Williams, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, rendered October 20, 1978, convicting him of rape in the first degree and sodomy in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and sentencing him to two concurrent terms of imprisonment, each having a maximum of 15 years. Judgment modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentences to two concurrent terms of imprisonment, each having a maximum of 10 years. As so modified, judgment affirmed. The sentences were excessive to the extent indicated. We have examined the defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Martuscello and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
Part 5250 - EXTRAORDINARY

CONTRACTUAL ACTIONS AND THE SAFETY

ACT

Subpart 5250.1 - EXTRAORDINARY CONTRACTUAL ACTIONS

5250.101 General.

5250.101-3 Records.

5250.102 Delegation of and limitations on exercise of authority.

5250.102-1-70 Contract adjustment boards.

5250.102-2 Contract adjustment boards.

5250.103 Contract adjustments.

5250.103-5 Processing cases.

5250.103-6 Disposition.

5250.104 Residual powers.

5250.104-3 Special procedures for unusually hazardous or nuclear risks.

Subpart 5250.1 - EXTRAORDINARY CONTRACTUAL

ACTIONS

5250.101 General.

5250.101-3 Records.

(1)(iii) HCAs are the officials responsible for preparation and submission of the required records.

Forward records to DASN(P) by email at usn.pentagon.asstsecnavrdadc.mbx.pabt@us.navy.mil with

the subject “[Activity Name] FAR 50.101-3, Request for Relief.”

5250.102 Delegation of and limitations on exercise of authority.
5250.102-1-70 Contract adjustment boards.

(a) Military Departments. Subject to the restrictions on delegations of authority in DFARS Part 250

and FAR 50.102-1 and 50.102-3, HCAs may exercise without power of redelegation, the authority

contained in the Act and Executive Order for amounts not exceeding the threshold at FAR

50.102-1(b).

(i) HCAs may deny any request, regardless of dollar value.

(ii) ASN(RDA) is the approval authority for requests to obligate the Government in excess of the

threshold at FAR 50.102-1(b). Submit requests for adjudication by the Navy Contract Adjustment

Board by email at usn.pentagon.asstsecnavrdadc.mbx.pabt@us.navy.mil with the subject “[Activity

Name] DFARS 250.102-1-70 - Extraordinary Contractual Relief pursuant to [insert “Public Law

85-804” or “Executive Order 10789”].

5250.102-2 Contract adjustment boards.

Members and alternate members will be appointed by DASN(P).

5250.103 Contract adjustments.

5250.103-5 Processing cases.

(b) The contracting activity responsible for processing a contractor's request for contractual

adjustment under a DON contract is responsible for establishing liaison and joint action with other

Military Departments and other departments and agencies of the Government, until the case is

submitted to the Navy Contract Adjustment Board for disposition.

5250.103-6 Disposition.

When a contractor's request is denied below the Secretarial level, the contracting officer of the

activity that forwarded the case to the board shall furnish a letter to the contractor explaining the

denial.

5250.104 Residual powers.

5250.104-3 Special procedures for unusually hazardous or nuclear risks.

(b) Submit requests for authorization to use the clause prescribed at FAR 50.104-4 with sufficient

justification to SECNAV via DASN(P) by email at
usn.pentagon.asstsecnavrdadc.mbx.pabt@us.navy.mil with the subject “[Activity Name] FAR

50.104-3 – Indemnification Request.”
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3393 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain boys’ water resistant pants. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 6, 2006 

Mr. DEMINT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain boys’ water 

resistant pants. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN BOYS’ WATER RESISTANT PANTS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.— 

5 (1) Chapter 61 of the Harmonized Tariff 

6 Schedule of the United States is amended by insert7 ing in numerical sequence, the following statistical 

8 note: 

9 ‘‘7. For the purposes of subheadings 6103.43.15, 

10 6104.63.20, and 6113.00.90, the term ‘performance out11 erwear pants’ means ankle length pants of water resistant 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•S 3393 IS 

1 synthetic fabrics, containing at least two of the following 

2 characteristics: side openings, sealed seams at the front 

3 (up to the zipper or other means of closure) and the back 

4 rise, insulation for cold weather protection, at least one 

5 pocket with a means of closure (zippered or hook and loop 

6 enclosed pockets or other type of enclosed pockets), scuff 

7 guards, elasticized or drawstring weather closure around 

8 the waist or ankles, articulated knees, or reinforcement 

9 in the seat or knees. The term ‘water resistant’ means 

10 a garment, notwithstanding classification, that would oth11 erwise pass the test for water resistance described in U.S. 

12 note 2 to chapter 62. The term ‘sealed seams’ means a 

13 seam that is sealed by means of taping, gluing, bonding, 

14 cementing, or similar processes for the purpose of water15 proofing the seam.’’. 

16 (2) Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Har17 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

18 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the fol19 lowing new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.61.02 Boys’ performance outerwear pants described in statistical note 7 to chapter 61 

(provided for in subheading 6103.43.15) Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

20 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

21 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
3 

•S 3393 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
935.010 Scientific and technical reports.

(c) All research and development contracts which require reporting of research and development

results conveyed in scientific and technical information (STI) shall include an instruction requiring

the contractor to submit all STI, including reports and notices relating thereto, electronically to the

U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), using the

DOE Energy Link System (E-link) at http://www.osti.gov/elink. The phrase “reports and notices

relating thereto” does not include reports or notices concerning administrative matters such as

contract cost or financial data and information. The DOE Order 241.1B Scientific and Technical

Information Management, or its successor version, sets forth requirements for STI management.

(d) As prescribed in DOE Order 241.1B, the contracting officer shall ensure that the requirements of

the attendant Contractor Requirements Document are included in applicable contracts.

Parent topic: PART 935 - RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING
#### Carolyn Tuttle, Respondent, v Coach Nail Salon, Inc., Appellant.

[815 NYS2d 476]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Smith, J.), dated January 9, 2006, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff alleged that she contracted the herpes simplex virus during an eyebrow waxing procedure that was performed at the defendant’s premises. She commenced the instant action to recover damages for her alleged injuries. The defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The Supreme Court denied the defendant’s motion.

In support of its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, the defendant failed to make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, tendering sufficient evidence to eliminate any material issues of fact *(see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,*64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]). *982Triable issues of fact exist, inter alia, as to whether the plaintiff became afflicted with the virus during the eyebrow waxing *(cf. Rossoto v Vadher,*220 AD2d 569, 570 [1995]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion. Crane, J.P., Rivera, Skelos and Dillon, JJ., concur.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 

) 2:06cr196-MHT

NESTOR AMAIQUEMA-MACIAS )

ORDER

It is ORDERED as follows:

(1) Defendant Nestor Amaiquema-Macias’s motion for

immediate sentencing (doc. no. 20) is granted.

(2) Defendant Amaiquema-Macias’s sentencing,

currently scheduled for January 18, 2007, is

reset for December 22, 2006 at 9:00 am in

Courtroom 2FMJ of the Frank M. Johnson Jr.

United States Courthouse Complex, One Church

Street, Montgomery, Alabama.

DONE, this the 21st day of December, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:06-cr-00196-MHT-CSC Document 23 Filed 12/21/2006 Page 1 of 1
616.506-70 DOSAR contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 652.216–70, Ordering—Indefinite-Delivery Contract,

whenever the clause at FAR 52.216–20, Definite Quantity, or the clause at FAR 52.216–21,

Requirements, or the clause at FAR 52.216–22, Indefinite Quantity, is used.

Parent topic: Subpart 616.5—Indefinite-Delivery Contracts
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear at 70 FR 30897, May 31, 2005; 77 FR 39904, July 6, 2012; 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

#### § 10.38 Certifications.

Whenever information is made a part of the record under the exceptions authorized by § 10.28 (i), (j), or (l), the record shall contain certificates evidencing that the required determinations have been made.
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Viking Minerals Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles Irizarry,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
4th day of August, 2010.


/s/ Charles Irizarry
------------------------------
Charles Irizarry
Chief Financial Officer
# Subpart 1406.2 - Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources

**Parent topic:**PART 1406 - COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS

## 1406.202 Establishing or maintaining alternative sources.

HCAs are authorized to approve the determinations and findings (D&Fs) to establish or maintain an alternative source or sources for supplies or services.
#### § 1017.13 Report concerning determinations.

The Office of Classification or successor office shall issue a report by the end of each quarter that identifies any new information that has been determined for the first time to be UCNI during the previous quarter, explains how each such determination meets the criteria in § 1017.7, and explains why each such determination protects from disclosure only the minimum amount of information necessary to protect the health and safety of the public or the common defense and security. A copy of the report may be obtained by writing to the Office of Classification, Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20585-1290.

[73 FR 32641, June 10, 2008, as amended at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023]
§ 996.13 Peanuts. *Peanuts* means the seeds of the legume *Arachis hypogaea* and includes both inshell and shelled peanuts produced in the United States or imported from foreign countries and intended for further processing prior to consumption by humans or animals, other than those intended for wildlife or those in green form for consumption as boiled peanuts. ( a ) *Farmers Stock.* “Farmers stock peanuts” means picked and threshed peanuts which have not been shelled, crushed, cleaned or otherwise changed (except for removal of foreign material, loose shelled kernels, and excess moisture) from the form in which customarily marketed by producers.
( b ) *Segregation 1.* “Segregation 1 peanuts” means farmers stock peanuts with not more than 3.49 percent damaged kernels nor more than 1.00 percent concealed damage caused by rancidity, mold, or decay and which are free from visible *Aspergillus flavus*.
( c ) *Segregation 2.* “Segregation 2 peanuts” means farmers stock peanuts with more than 3.49 percent damaged kernels or more than 1.00 percent concealed damage caused by rancidity, mold, or decay and which are free from visible *Aspergillus flavus*.
( d ) *Segregation 3.* “Segregation 3 peanuts” means farmers stock peanuts with visible *Aspergillus flavus.*
[67 FR 57140, Sept. 9, 2002, as amended at 81 FR 50288, Aug. 1, 2016; 82 FR 48758, Oct. 20, 2017]