alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

EASTERN DIVISION (OPELIKA) 

ELIZABETH LYNNE HUTCHINSON ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 

3:06-cv-00700-WHA 

THE PHENIX CITY BOARD OF ) 

EDUCATION and LARRY E. DiCHIARA ) 

 ) 

 Defendants ) 

 SECOND REVISED DEFENDANTS’ WITNESS LIST

 Come now the Defendants, Phenix City Board of Education and Larry E. DiChiara and 

submit the following SECOND REVISED DEFENDANTS’ LIST in compliance with Rule 

26(a)(3)(A) and (B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

A. The following are additional witnesses that are to be added to the Revised Defendants’ 

Witness List as witnesses expected to be called at the trial of this cause. 

1. Dorothea McKissic, 134 Highway 165 Lot #2, Phenix City, AL, work phone – 334-

298-0884. 

2. Laura Sewell, P.O. Box 3313, Phenix City, AL 36868; work phone – 334-298-8744. 

Both of these ladies may also be reached through the undersigned counsel. 

 This the 19th day of December, 2007. 

 

Respectfully Submitted, 

/s/Sydney S. Smith 

Smith & Smith, P.C. 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Phenix City Board of Education 

Larry E. DiChiara 

1503 Broad Street 

Phenix City, AL 36867 

334-298-2679 

ASB-4248-T82S 

Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 66 Filed 12/19/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have filed the Second Revised Defendants’ Witness List by 

CM/ECF on this 19th day of December, 2007, and it will be served upon Plaintiff’s 

counsel. 

 Joshua D. Wilson, Esq. 

 Rocco Calamusa, Jr., Esq. 

 Wiggins, Childs, Quinn & Pantazis, LLC. 

 The Kress Building 

 301 19th Street North 

 Birmingham, Alabama 35203 

jwilson@wcqp.com

rcalamusa@wcqp.com

 

 /s/ Sydney S. Smith 

Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 66 Filed 12/19/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### § 1040.81 Purpose.

The purpose of these regulations is to implement the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as Amended, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of age in programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance. In accordance with the Age Discrimination Act, federally assisted programs or activities and recipients of Federal funds may continue to use age distinctions and factors other than age which meet the requirements of the Act and these regulations.

[50 FR 8089, Feb. 27, 1985, as amended at 68 FR 51348, Aug. 26, 2003]
§ 110.109 Motions and requests. ( a ) Motions and requests shall be addressed to the presiding officer, and, if written, also filed with the Secretary and served on other participants.
( b ) Other participants may respond to the motion or request. Responses to written motions or requests shall be filed within 5 days after service.
( c ) When the Commission does not preside, in response to a motion or request, the presiding officer may refer a ruling or certify a question to the Commission for decision and notify the participants.
( d ) Unless otherwise ordered by the Commission, a motion or request, or the certification of a question or referral of a ruling, shall not stay or extend any aspect of the hearing.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 237 (Friday, December 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76952-76953]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31109]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1724]


Grant of Authority for Subzone Status; Lam Research Corporation 
(Wafer Fabrication Equipment) Fremont, Newark, and Livermore, CA

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 
(the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zones Act provides for ``* * * the 
establishment * * * of foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of the 
United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, and for 
other purposes,'' and authorizes the Foreign-Trade Zones Board to grant 
to qualified corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade 
zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs and Border Protection ports of 
entry;
    Whereas, the Board's regulations (15 CFR Part 400) provide for the 
establishment of special-purpose subzones when existing zone facilities 
cannot serve the specific use involved, and when the activity results 
in a significant public benefit and is in the public interest;
    Whereas, the City of San Jose, California, grantee of Foreign-Trade 
Zone 18, has made application to the Board for authority to establish a 
special-purpose subzone at the wafer fabrication equipment 
manufacturing and distribution facilities of Lam Research Corporation, 
located in Fremont, Newark, and Livermore, California, (FTZ Docket 36-
2010, filed 5/18/2010);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment has been given in the 
Federal Register (75 FR 29722-29723, 5/27/2010) and the application has 
been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; 
and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the 
public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby grants authority for subzone 
status for activity related to the manufacturing and distribution of 
wafer fabrication equipment at the facilities of Lam Research 
Corporation, located in Fremont, Newark, and Livermore, California 
(Subzone 18F), as described in the application and Federal Register 
notice, subject to the FTZ Act and the

[[Page 76953]]

Board's regulations, including Section 400.28.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 26th day of November 2010.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-31109 Filed 12-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
Exhibit 24

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below
constitutes and appoints Scott A. Caldwell his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name and/or his behalf, to do any and all acts and things and to execute any and all
instruments which said attorney-in-fact and agent may deem necessary or advisable to enable Allied Nevada Gold Corp. to comply with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and any rules, regulations or requirements of the Securities and
Exchange Commission in respect thereof, including, without limitation, the power and authority to sign his name in any and all capacities (including his capacity as a Director and/or Officer of Allied Nevada Gold Corp.) to the Annual Report on Form
10-K of Allied Nevada Gold Corp. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 and the undersigned hereby ratifies and confirms all that said attorney-in-fact and agent or any substitute or substitutes for, shall lawfully do or cause to be done
by virtue hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have subscribed these presents on the dates stated.



|                                               |  |                                 |  |              
|---------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------- |  | -------------
|Signature                                      |  | Title                           |  | Date         
|/s/    ROBERT M.
BUCHAN Robert M. Buchan       |  | Executive Chairman and Director |  | March 6, 2008
|                                               |  |                                
|/s/    W. DURAND
EPPLER W. Durand Eppler       |  | Director                        |  | March 6, 2008
|                                               |  |                                
|/s/    JOHN W.
IVANY John W. Ivany             |  | Director                        |  | March 6, 2008
|                                               |  |                                
|/s/    CAMERON A.
MINGAY Cameron A. Mingay     |  | Director                        |  | March 6, 2008
|                                               |  |                                
|/s/    TERRY M.
PALMER Terry M. Palmer         |  | Director                        |  | March 6, 2008
|                                               |  |                                
|/s/    CARL
PESCIO Carl Pescio                 |  | Director                        |  | March 6, 2008
|                                               |  |                                
|/s/    MICHAEL B.
RICHINGS Michael B. Richings |  | Director                        |  | March 6, 2008
|                                               |  |                                
|/s/    D. BRUCE
SINCLAIR D. Bruce Sinclair     |  | Director                        |  | March 6, 2008
|                                               |  |                                
|/s/    ROBERT G.
WARDELL Robert G. Wardell     |  | Director                        |  | March 6, 2008
Editorial Note on Part 982
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 61 FR 17559, Apr. 22, 1996.

§ 982.45 Establishment of grade, size, and quality regulations. ( a ) *Minimum standards.* No handler shall handle any inshell or shelled hazelnuts unless such inshell hazelnuts meet requirements of Oregon No. 1 grade and medium size (as defined in the Oregon Grade Standards Hazelnuts In Shell), and such shelled hazelnuts meet such requirements as are established by the Secretary on the basis of a recommendation of the Board, except as may be otherwise provided in § 982.57. These minimum standards may be modified by the Secretary on the basis of a recommendation of the Board or other information whenever he finds that such modification would tend to effectuate the declared policy of the act. Such minimum standards and the provisions of this part relating to the administration thereof shall continue in effect irrespective of whether the season average price of hazelnuts is above the parity level specified in section 2(1) of the act.
( b ) *Additional grade and size regulations.* When the season average price of hazelnuts is not determined to be above parity, the Secretary may establish additional grade and size regulations for inshell hazelnuts in the form of a more restrictive minimum standard than that specified in paragraph (a) of this section, or pack specifications as to grades and sizes that may be handled, if he finds, on the basis of a recommendation of the Board or other information, that such regulations would tend to effectuate the declared policy of the act.
( c ) *Quality regulations.* For any marketing year, the Board may establish, with the approval of the Secretary, such minimum quality and inspection requirements applicable to hazelnuts to facilitate the reduction of pathogens as will contribute to orderly marketing or will be in the public interest. In such marketing year, no handler shall handle hazelnuts unless they meet applicable minimum quality and inspection requirements as evidenced by certification acceptable to the Board.
( d ) *Different regulations for different markets.* The Board may, with the approval of the Secretary, recommend different outgoing quality requirements for different markets. The Board, with the approval of the Secretary, may establish rules and regulations necessary and incidental to the administration of this provision.
[24 FR 6185, Aug. 1, 1959. Redesignated at 26 FR 12751, Dec. 30, 1961, as amended at 37 FR 589, Jan. 14, 1972; 83 FR 52949, Oct. 19, 2018]
Bob Bevilaqua

Town of Harrietstown Supervisor

39 Main Street

Saranac Lake, NY 12983

"., ...-';'{: ~-I; !'

\.! i t-/

: - ,,~.

: ,.•.•. .-- -,

Re: Essential Air Service

Dear Bob,

Iam writing on behalf of the Saranac Lake Area Chamber of Commerce to provide our strong

support for the expansion of the BASfrom the Adirondack Regional Airport to Westchester

County.

Representing over 300 area businesses in the Saranac Lake region we recognize the increased

ridership over the last year and the strong economic impact affecting our local businesses. With

the February 2014 expiration of the current EAS quickly approaching we are requesting that the

Department of Transportation and the Town of Harrietstown explicitly solicit proposals for a

summer season increase in capacity to reflect the summer influx of passengers in the

forthcoming EAS RFP.

Anew flight path to New York City will bring an entirely new market of tourists to our area with

the ease of daily flights. Currently, the options for travel to the city involve a two and a half hour

car ride to Albany, NY followed by an additional two and a half hour train ride; a two and a half

hour drive to Burlington International Airport; or a 6 hour car ride (one way travel), The current

situation simply complicates travel for business cliental and tourists wishing to travel to and

from NYC and is leaving a large gap for potential growth our area.

In conversations with several business owners and community leaders ~ the consensus is clear

that the success of the Saranac Lake - Boston daily flight schedule would be replicated with a

Saranac Lake - New York City Schedule. Increased, reliable and efficient transportation

between Saranac Lake and two major population centers will prove to be a significant economic

development advantage to our region.

Sincerely,

;(~1 ~v1(}v[,{1JA--

Katy Vah Anden

Executive Director, Saranac Lake Area Chamber of Commerce

193 River Street. Saranac Lake, NY 12983

Phone: (518) 891-1990 or (800) 347-1992

Fax: (5 j 8) 891-7042

www.saranaclake.comjnfo@saranac1ake.com

Saranac Lake bO•.,

AIHlmel1ca CItY

~( I.'

DOZEN DISTINCTIVE

DESTINATIONS 2006

1998
Granite Construction Company 

1900 Glendale Avenue 

Sparks, NV 89431 

January 14, 2016 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Amendment to Exemption 12541 issued pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 

Part II of the Federal Aviation Regulations in Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-1644. 

Dear Madam, Sir, 

Granite Construction Company currently holds an Exemption numbered 12541 (hereinafter the 

Exemption) issued for the purpose of performing aerial imaging and data collection. Granite 

Construction Company herby requests an amendment to that Exemption to include additional 

small unmanned aircraft systems (sUAS) that fully complies with the conditions of the Exemption 

to support client requests (public interest). 

The requested system (to be used under the same terms and conditions contained in the original 

Exemption) to be added to our existing Exemption is cited below. 

• 3DR – Iris Plus 

• 3DR – Solo 

• DJI – Inspire 1 

• DJI – Phantom 3 

• DJI – Phantom 2 

• DJI – S1000 

• Trimble – ZX5 

• Typhoon – Q500 

The FAA previously determined the airworthiness of the 3DR IRIS in Exemption No. 12368 

(Dark Technologies, LLC). The FAA previously determined the airworthiness of the 3DR Solo in 

Exemption No. 11832 (AUV, LLC). The FAA previously determined the airworthiness of the DJI 

Inspire 1 in Exemption No. 11295 (RoboFlight Systems LLC). The FAA previously determined 

the airworthiness of the DJI Phantom 3 in Exemption No. 12997 (New England Studio LLC). The 

FAA previously determined the airworthiness of the DJI Phantom 2 in Exemption No. 11260 

(First Flight Photography, LLC). The FAA previously determined the airworthiness of the DJI 

S1000 in Exemption No. 11881 (Empire Unmanned LLC). The FAA previously determined the 

airworthiness of the Trimble ZX5 in Exemption No. 11110B (Trimble navigation LTD.). The 

FAA previously determined the airworthiness of the Typhoon Q500 in Exemption No. 11696 

(Midwest UAV Imaging). 
Granite Construction Company states that no conditions or limitation from our original request 

have changed and all operations of the additional UAS will be in full compliance with the terms 

and condition of the Exemption. 

Please contact Sergio Callegari, Construction Technologies Engineer, 775-352-5417, 

Sergio.callegari@gcinc.com should you have any questions concerning this request for an 

amendment to the Exemption. 

Sergio Callegari 

Construction Technologies Engineer
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3121 

To limit the reduction in the number of personnel of the Air Force Space 

Command, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. ALLARD (for himself and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To limit the reduction in the number of personnel of the 

Air Force Space Command, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON REDUCTION IN PERSONNEL OF 

4 AIR FORCE SPACE COMMAND. 

5 (a) LIMITATION.—The Secretary of the Air Force 

6 may not reduce the number of military personnel, civilian 

7 employees, or contractor support personnel assigned to the 

8 Air Force Space Command, or any component of the Air 

9 Force Space Command, from the number of such per10 sonnel or employees assigned to the Air Force Space ComVerDate Aug 31 2005 04:33 Jun 01, 2006 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3121.IS S3121

ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 3121 IS

1 mand as of January 1, 2006, until the Secretary submits 

2 to the appropriate committees of Congress the report de3 scribed in subsection (b). 

4 (b) REPORT.—The report described in this subsection 

5 is a report that includes the following: 

6 (1) A description of the proposed reduction in 

7 the number of military personnel, civilian employees, 

8 or contractor support personnel, as the case may be, 

9 assigned to the Air Force Space Command. 

10 (2) A justification for the proposed reduction. 

11 (3) An assessment of the effect of the proposed 

12 reduction on the capacity of the Air Force Space 

13 command to conduct its mission in support of oper14 ational commanders. 

15 (4) An assessment whether or not the effect of 

16 the proposed reduction could be mitigated by grant17 ing the commander of the Air Forces Space Com18 mand, or the appropriate program executive officers, 

19 enhanced authority to make personnel and resource 

20 decisions in implementing the proposed reduction. 

21 (5) A certification that the proposed reduction 

22 will not impede, disrupt, or otherwise diminish or 

23 interfere with the national security space acquisition 

24 programs of the United States, national security 

25 space operations of the United States, or national 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

•S 3121 IS

1 security space technology development by the United 

2 States. 

3 (c) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS DE4 FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘appropriate commit5 tees of Congress’’ means— 

6 (1) the Committees on Armed Services and Ap7 propriations and the Select Committee on Intel8 ligence of the Senate; and 

9 (2) the Committees on Armed Services and Ap10 propriations and the Permanent Select Committee 

11 on Intelligence of the House of Representatives. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
#### § 1042.120 Transfers of property.

If a recipient sells or otherwise transfers property financed in whole or in part with Federal financial assistance to a transferee that operates any education program or activity, and the Federal share of the fair market value of the property is not upon such sale or transfer properly accounted for to the Federal Government, both the transferor and the transferee shall be deemed to be recipients, subject to the provisions of §§ 1042.205 through 1042.235(a).
§ 1017.20 Routine access. ( a ) *Authorized Individual.* The Reviewing Official who determines that a document or material contains UCNI is the initial Authorized Individual for that document or material. An Authorized Individual, for UCNI in his or her possession or control, may determine that another person is an Authorized Individual who may be granted access to the UCNI, subject to limitations in paragraph (b) of this section, and who may further disseminate the UCNI under the provisions of this section.
( b ) *Requirements for routine access.* To be eligible for routine access to UCNI, the person must have a need to know the UCNI in order to perform official duties or other Government-authorized activities and must be: ( 1 ) A U.S. citizen who is: ( i ) An employee of any branch of the Federal Government, including the U.S. Armed Forces;
( ii ) An employee or representative of a State, local, or Indian tribal government;
( iii ) A member of an emergency response organization;
( iv ) An employee of a Government contractor or a consultant, including those contractors or consultants who need access to bid on a Government contract;
( v ) A member of Congress or a staff member of a congressional committee or of an individual member of Congress;
( vi ) A Governor of a State, his or her designated representative, or a State government official;
( vii ) A member of a DOE advisory committee; or,
( viii ) A member of an entity that has entered into a formal agreement with the Government, such as a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement or similar arrangement; or,
( 2 ) A person who is not a U.S. citizen but who is: ( i ) A Federal Government employee or a member of the U.S. Armed Forces;
( ii ) An employee of a Federal Government contractor or subcontractor;
( iii ) A Federal Government consultant;
( iv ) A member of a DOE advisory committee;
( v ) A member of an entity that has entered into a formal agreement with the Government, such as a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement or similar arrangement;
( vi ) An employee or representative of a State, local, or Indian tribal government; or,
( vii ) A member of an emergency response organization when responding to an emergency; or,
( 3 ) A person who is not a U.S. citizen but who needs to know the UCNI in conjunction with an activity approved by the DOE Program Secretarial Officer or NNSA Deputy or Associate Administrator with cognizance over the UCNI.
## IN THE COU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS N O S. A P - 76, 109, A P - 76, 110, & A P - 76, 111

EX PA R TE N O R M A N K Y LE TE R R Y , A ppl i c ant
ON AP P LI CAT I ONS F OR A W RI T OF HABE AS CORP US CAUS E N OS . 0 0 7 - 1 1 0 8 - 0 7 - A, 0 0 7 - 1 1 0 9 - 0 7 - A, 0 0 7 - 1 2 4 9 - 0 7 - A

I N T HE 7 t h DI S TR I CT COURT FROM S M I TH CO UNTY

P er cur i am . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Ar t i cl e 1 1 .07 of the Te x as Code of Criminal Proce dure, the cler k of the trial c ourt transmitted to this C ourt these a pplications for a

writ of habe as corp us. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant wa s convicted of two char g es of e va din garr e st, and

fa ilure to s top and

re nd e r a id. He was sen ten ced to e ig hte e n y e ars ’ imprisonment in each c ause. Ap p li c an t c o n te n d s, in ter a lia , th a t his c ouns e l r e nd e re d in e ff e c tiv e a ssi sta

nc e be c a us e counsel he failed to timely file a notice of appe al.2

The trial c ourt has dete rmined, base d upon the re cord, that Applicant is entitled to an out-oftim e a pp e a l. We fi nd , the re fo re , that Ap pli c ant is e nti tle d to the op po rt un ity to f ile an o ut- of

-t ime appea l of the judg ments of conviction in Cause Nos. 007-1108-07- A, 007-1109-07- A, 007-1249-07- A fr om the 7th Judic ia l Distri c t Cour t of Smit h County . App lic ant i s o rd e re d r e tur ne d to that ti me at w hic h he may

g ive wr itt e n n oti c e of

a pp e a l so that he may

the n, wi th t

he a id o f c ouns e l, o bta in
a mea ningf ul appea l. All tim e limits shall be calculate d as if the sentenc e had be en imposed on the date on wh ic h the mand ate of

thi s Co ur t is su e s. We h old

that, s ho uld

Ap pli c ant d e sir e to p ro se c ute an appe al, he must take aff irmative steps to file a written notice of appea l in the tr ial court within 30 da y s a ft e r t he mand ate of

thi s Co ur t is su e s.

Deliver ed: MARCH 11, 2009 Do No t Pu

bli sh