alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

OWEN J. ROGAL, D.D.S., P.C., )

d/b/a THE PAIN CENTER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06cv711-VPM

) [WO]

SKILSTAF, INC., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER ON MOTION

This case was transferred to this district from the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on

9 August 2006 (Doc. # 13). On 29 November 2005 (while the case was still pending in

Pennsylvania), the defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint (Doc. # 3).

The grounds asserted for the motion were FED. R. CIV. PRO. 12(b)(2) (lack of personal

jurisdiction), 12(b)(3) (improper venue), and 12(b)(6) (failure to exhaust administrative

remedies). Approximately one week later, the defendant filed a Motion to Withdraw Certain

Arguments in its motion, specifically lack of personal jurisdiction and improper venue. The

defendant expressed its desire to premise its motion exclusively on the assertion that the

plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies.

The court notes that, in addition to the defendant’s request to withdraw the first two

premises of its motion, those premises have been rendered moot by the transfer of the case

to this district.

Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 17 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 1 of 2
Accordingly, for good cause, it is

ORDERED that the motion to withdraw is GRANTED. The motion to dismiss will

proceed on the sole ground of failure to exhaust administrative remedies.

DONE this 7 day of September, 2006. th

/s/ Vanzetta Penn McPherson

VANZETTA PENN MCPHERSON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 17 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 2 of 2
# Subpart 5614.2 - SOLICITATION OF BIDS

**Parent topic:**Part 5614 - SEALED BIDDING

## 5614-201 Preparation of Invitations for Bid.

### 5614.201-6 Solicitation Provisions.

*(Revised June 2021)*

(bb) The Contracting officer may include a provision substantially the same as clause 5652.214-9003, Price History, in solicitations where the item(s) being purchased have been previously acquired and the Contracting Officer wants to include the price history in the solicitation. 

## 5614.207 PreBid Conference.

Contracting officers may insert a provision substantially the same as clause 5652.214-9002, Notice of Pre-bid Conference, in solicitations where a pre-bid conference is contemplated.
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 69 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 1 of 1
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 2012

- NM

- 060

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-10-00824-CR

IN RE Jason MIEARS

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: November 24, 2010

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND PETITION FOR WRIT OF INJUNCTION 

DENIED

On November 10, 2010, relator Jason Miears filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a 

petition for writ of injunction. The court has considered relator’s petitions and is of the opinion 

that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petitions are DENIED. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause Nos. 2009-CR-6566 and 2009-CR-6569, styled State of Texas v. 

Jason Miears, pending in the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Ron Rangel

presiding.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

WILLIE McNAIR, ) 

 ) 

Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

v. ) 

 ) No. 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-SRW

RICHARD ALLEN, Commissioner, ) 

Alabama Department of Corrections, ) 

And GRANTT CULLIVER, Warden, ) 

Holman Correctional Facility ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

 The undersigned Counsel, James W. Davis, files this Notice of Appearance as additional 

counsel for the Defendants / Counter-plaintiffs, Richard Allen, in his official capacity as 

Commissioner of the Alabama Department of Corrections, and Grantt Culliver, in his official 

capacity as Warden of the Holman Correctional Facility. 

Respectfully submitted, 

TROY KING (KIN047) 

ATTORNEY GENERAL 

BY: 

s/ James W. Davis 

James W. Davis (DAV103)

Assistant Attorney General 

OF COUNSEL: 

Office of the Attorney General 

11 South Union Street 

Montgomery, AL 36130 

(334) 242-7300 

(334) 353-8440 Fax 

Email: jimdavis@ago.state.al.us 

 

Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 10 Filed 10/02/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on the 2nd day of October, 2006, a copy of the foregoing has been 

electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will 

electronically send a copy of the same to the following: 

Cathleen I. Price 

Equal Justice Initiative of Alabama 

122 Commerce Street 

Montgomery, AL 36104 

cprice@eji.org

Randall S. Susskind 

Equal Justice Initiative of Alabama 

122 Commerce Street 

Montgomery, AL 36104 

rsusskind@eji.org

s/ James W. Davis 

James W. Davis (DAV103)

Assistant Attorney General 

office of the Attorney General 

11 South Union Street 

Montgomery, AL 36130 

(334) 242-7300 

(334) 353-8440 Fax 

Email: jimdavis@ago.state.al.us 

Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 10 Filed 10/02/2006 Page 2 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-00713-MHT-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-00713-MHT-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 2 of 2
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 78 FR 34247, June 7, 2013.

§ 1.57 Use of NRC flag. ( a ) The use of the flag is restricted to the following: ( 1 ) On or in front of NRC installations;
( 2 ) At NRC ceremonies;
( 3 ) At conferences involving official NRC participation (including permanent display in NRC conference rooms);
( 4 ) At Governmental or public appearances of NRC executives;
( 5 ) In private offices of senior officials; or
( 6 ) As the Secretary of the Commission otherwise authorizes.
( b ) The NRC flag must only be displayed together with the U.S. flag.
When they are both displayed on a speaker's platform, the U.S. flag must occupy the position of honor and be placed at the speaker's right as he or she faces the audience, and the NRC flag must be placed at the speaker's left.
Exhibit 35
                                  ----------

                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWALT, INC.
                        ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2006-OC8
              MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-OC8


      The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an officer
of Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing
LP (the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant to
Section 3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned
Series (the "Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout such calendar year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                      Dated: March 14, 2007
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
April 2, 2015

Mr. Erik Edgington Agent for Single Wave Media, LLC Single Wave Media, LLC
6929 Mildred Avenue SE Grand Rapids, MI 49508

Dear Mr. Edgington:

This is in response to your December 15, 2014, letter sent to the docket (No. FAA-2014- 1084) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administ ration (FAA) on behalf of Single Wave Media, LLC (Single Wave Media) for an ex emption from part 21; §§ 45.23(b); 61.113(a) and (b); 91.7(a); 91.9(b)(2); 91.103(b); 91.109; 91.119; 91.121; 91.151(a); 91.203(a) and (b); 91.405(a); 91.407(a)(1); 91.409(a)(2); and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Single Wave Media to conduct aerial cinematography for the motion picture, television, and private industry for scripted closed-set filming.

By email dated February 25, 2015, which posted to the docket on the same day, the FAA sent you a request for additional information asking you to:

 Describe the aircraft make and model for the proposed UAS operation.

 Provide description of proximity to airports.

 Describe the process used to determine if the UAS is airworthy and in safe condition for operation in the NAS.

 Describe the process used to document UAS discrepancies and the corrective action
taken in the aircraft record.

 Provide a copy of the following referenced materials:

o Flight Operations Manual

o Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual

o Operating Manual2 The FAA has not received this additional information.

Because your petition lacks sufficient information to proceed, the FAA has closed your exemption request. Should you wish to provide the additional information please resubmit your petition for exemption to the public docket.

Sincerely,

/s/
Lirio Liu Director, Office of Rulemaking
#### Acciaierie E. Ferriere Lombarde Falck S.p.A., Appellant, v Pete Sublett and Company, Respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered January 8, 1980, reversed, on the law and the facts, and the motion of defendant-respondent to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction unanimously denied, with costs and disbursements. Defendant-respondent has sufficiently projected itself into this State in connection with the subject matter of the litigation to have conferred jurisdiction on our courts. In addition, it still has on file a certificate of doing business here, and has designated the Secretary of State its agent to accept service of process in its behalf. (See *Pohlers v Exeter Mfg. Co.,*293 NY 274.) Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sandler, Markewich, Bloom and Yesawich, JJ.
#### § 932.50 Report of marketing policy.

At least 14 days prior to the start of each crop year (except that this period may be shortened by the committee not more than 5 days if warranted), the committee shall hold a meeting for the purpose of formulating a marketing policy for the coming crop year: *Provided,* That with respect to the 1982-83 crop year the committee shall hold a meeting for such purpose as soon as practicable. The committee shall prepare and submit to the Secretary promptly after each such meeting, a report setting forth its recommended marketing policy for the ensuing crop year. In the event it becomes advisable to modify such policy, because of changed supply, demand, or other conditions, the committee shall formulate a new policy and shall submit a report thereon to the Secretary. In developing the marketing policy, the committee shall give consideration to the handler carryover, production, probable quality and composition of olive sizes in the crop, trade demand, probable imports, whether producer prices are likely to exceed parity, the probable assessable tonnage and such other factors as may have a bearing on the marketing of olives or the administration of this part. Notice of the committee's marketing policy, and of any modifications thereof, shall be given promptly by reasonable publicity to producers and handlers.

[30 FR 12629, Oct. 2, 1965, as amended at 47 FR 32908, July 30, 1982]
###### Editorial Note on Subpart A of Part 989

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 989 appear at 83 FR 53973, Oct. 26, 2018.

#### § 989.38 Procedure.

The Committee shall meet at the call of the chairman, or vice-chairman when acting as chairman, or at the call of any three members. All decisions of the Committee reached shall be by majority vote of the members present. All votes shall be cast in person and a quorum must be present. The presence of 25 members shall be required to constitute a quorum. The Committee shall give to the Secretary the same notice of meetings of the Committee as it gives to its members.

[48 FR 32976, July 20, 1983]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial  information  extracted from Springhill
Lake  Investors LP 2000 First Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                               0000763399
<NAME>                              SPRINGHILL LAKE INVESTORS LP
<MULTIPLIER>                                           1,000

<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                 2,464
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              0
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           0 <F1>
<PP&E>                                               109,538
<DEPRECIATION>                                        54,878
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        62,225
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      0 <F1>
<BONDS>                                               55,098
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                                44
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          62,225
<SALES>                                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       5,998
<CGS>                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       5,766
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     1,309
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            0
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                             149
<EPS-BASIC>                                           219.00 <F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0
<FN>
<F1> Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2> Multiplier is 1.
</FN>


</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Subpart A of Part 989

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 989 appear at 83 FR 53973, Oct. 26, 2018.

#### § 989.32 Acceptance.

Each person to be selected by the Secretary as a member or as an alternate member of the Committee shall, prior to such selection, qualify by advising the Secretary that he/she agrees to serve in the position for which nominated for selection.

[48 FR 32975, July 20, 1983]
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Right Aid Medical Supply Corp., as Assignee of Cinquina, Domenica, Appellant,<br><br>against<br><br>ELRAC, Inc., Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell, Esq.), for appellant.Carman, Callahan &amp; Ingham, LLP (Jeffrey P. Saxon, Esq.), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Richard G. Latin, J.), entered July 29, 2014. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is reversed, with $30 costs, and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the action was premature because plaintiff had failed to provide requested verification. </p><p>As plaintiff argues, the affidavit it submitted in opposition to defendant's motion was sufficient to give rise to a presumption that the requested verification had been mailed to, and received by, defendant (<a href="../2008/2008_04072.htm" target="_blank"><i>see St. Vincent's Hosp. of Richmond v Government Empls. Ins. Co.</i>, 50 AD3d 1123</a> [2008]). In light of the foregoing, there is a triable issue of fact as to whether the action is premature (<a href="../2015/2015_51776.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Compas Med., P.C. v Praetorian Ins. Co.</i>, 49 Misc 3d 152</a>[A], 2015 NY <font color="FF0000">[*2]</font>Slip Op 51776[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2015]).</p><p>Accordingly, the order is reversed and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur. </p><br><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: December 08, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
- 1 -

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

GREAT SOUTHERN WOOD ) 

PRESERVING, INC. ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

vs. ) CV: 1:06CV708 

 ) 

 ) 

AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE ) 

COMPANY; AIG; AMERICAN ) 

INTERNATIONAL UNDERWRITERS ) 

CORPORATION; AMERICAN ) 

INTERNATIONAL MARINE AGENCY ) 

 ) 

Defendants ) 

MOTION FOR EXTENTION OF TIME TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING

 COMES NOW, American Home Assurance Company, AIG, American International 

Underwriters Corporation, American International Marine Agency (collectively “Defendants”), 

by and through undersigned counsel, and move for an extension of time to file their responsive 

pleadings in this action, up to and including September 9, 2006. As grounds, Defendants show 

as follows: 

1. This action was filed on August 9, 2006. Court records indicate that Defendants were 

served with a summons and complaint on August 10, 2006. 

2. The undersigned counsel has only recently been retained in this matter and needs 

additional time to obtain file materials and prepare responsive pleadings. 

3. Plaintiff has no opposition to the requested extension. 

Case 1:06-cv-00708-CSC Document 7 Filed 08/30/2006 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

WHEREFORE, the premises considered, defendants move the Court for an extension of 

time to file their responsive pleadings in this action, up to and including September 9, 2006. 

 s/Blane H. Crutchfield 

 BLANE H. CRUTCHFIELD (CRUTB4243) 

 Attorney for Defendants 

 American Home Assurance Company, AIG, 

 American International Underwriters Corporation, 

 American International Marine Agency 

OF COUNSEL: 

HAND ARENDALL, L.L.C. 

P. O. Box 123 

Mobile, AL 36601-0123 

Tel: (251) 432-5511 

Fax: (251) 694-6375 

bcrutchfield@handarendall.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have on this 30th day of August, 2006, electronically filed the 

foregoing pleading with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send 

notification of such filing to the following: 

Kenneth A. Dowdy 

kad@lusklaw.com

Leslie Ann Caldwell 

lac@lusklaw.com

 s/Blane H. Crutchfield 

 BLANE H. CRUTCHFIELD (CRUTB4243) 

Case 1:06-cv-00708-CSC Document 7 Filed 08/30/2006 Page 2 of 2
Subpart 306.2 - Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources    **Parent topic:** PART 306 - COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS306.202 Establishing or maintaining alternative sources.       (a) The Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) shall make the determination required in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 6.202(a).          (b)          (1)  			The contracting officer shall prepare the required determination and findings (D&F), see FAR 6.202(b)(1), based on the data provided by program personnel. The appropriate Competition Advocate (CA) (non-delegable) shall sign the D&F, indicating concurrence. The final determination will be made by the SPE.
Case 3:06-cv-00722-WKW-TFM Document 21 Filed 06/25/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00722-WKW-TFM Document 21 Filed 06/25/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00722-WKW-TFM Document 21 Filed 06/25/2007 Page 3 of 3
# Subpart 927.70 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**PART 927 - PATENTS, DATA, AND COPYRIGHTS
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00022

- CV

Eugene Flores

v.

James Wood Finance LLC §

§

§

§ From County Court at Law No. 2

o f Denton County ( CV

- 2012

- 02382 )

June 20 , 2013

Opinion by Justice Dauphinot



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is aff irmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_________________________________ Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot