alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SEMT 2012-6

 

EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.

 

I, Jeremy P. Strom, certify that:

 

1.	I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2012-6 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.	Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.	Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.	Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5.	All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: CoreLogic Tax Services, LLC (“CoreLogic”), American Security Insurance Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company and TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc. (collectively, “Assurant”), Cenlar, FSB as Servicer, First Republic Bank as Servicer, PHH Mortgage Corporation as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Custodian and Master Servicer, Computershare Trust Company, N.A. as Custodian and Master Servicer, and Citibank, N.A. as Securities Administrator and Paying Agent.

 

Date: March 30, 2023

 

 

/s/ Jeremy P. Strom

Signature

 

President

(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)

 

----
Case 1:06-mj-00074-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/28/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-mj-00074-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/28/2006 Page 2 of 2
§ 948.200 Accounting and collections. ( a ) Each handler's assessment account with Area No. 2 (San Luis Valley) Committee shall become due and payable upon presentation of a statement thereof to such handler.
( b ) If settlement of such an assessment account is not completed on or before the 20th day following presentation of a statement of such account, each handler failing to so complete settlement of his account may be declared delinquent by said area committee.
( c ) The name of each person who is declared delinquent may be forwarded to the Secretary and, in addition, the names of persons declared delinquent pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section may be publicized by said area committee.
( d ) Terms used in this section shall have the same meaning as when used in Marketing Agreement No. 97 and Order No. 948 (§§ 948.1 to 948.92).
[19 FR 8647, Dec. 17, 1954. Redesignated at 26 FR 12751, Dec. 30, 1961]
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MAI SystemsCorporation (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,William B. Kretzmer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuantto 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that :

 

1.               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | Date:  November 18, 2004 |                     |
|--------|-------------------------------|--------------------------|
|   | By:                           | /s/  William B. Kretzmer |
|   |                          | William B. Kretzmer      |
|   |                          | Chief Executive Officer  |

 

1

----
#### § 930.56 Off-premise inventory reserve.

Any handler may, upon notification to the Board, arrange to hold inventory reserve, of his or her own production or which was purchased, on the premises of another handler or in an approved commercial storage facility in the same manner as though the inventory reserve were on the handler's own premises.
Case 1:06-cv-00708-CSC Document 43 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00708-CSC Document 43 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 2 of 2
§ 996.60 Safeguard procedures for imported peanuts. ( a ) Prior to arrival of a foreign-produced peanut lot at a port-of-entry, the importer, or customs broker acting on behalf of the importer, shall submit information electronically to the United States Customs and Border Protection, which includes the following: The Customs Service entry number; the container number(s) or other identification of the lot(s); the volume of the peanuts in each lot being entered; the inland shipment destination where the lot will be made available for inspection; and a contact name or telephone number at the destination.
( b ) *Additional standards.* ( 1 ) Nothing contained in this section shall preclude any importer from milling or reconditioning, prior to importation, any shipment of peanuts for the purpose of making such lot eligible for importation into the United States. However, all peanuts entered for human consumption use must be certified as meeting the quality standards specified in § 996.31(a) prior to such disposition. Failure to fully comply with quality and handling standards as required under this section, will result enforcement action by USDA.
( 2 ) Imported peanut lots sampled and inspected at the port-of-entry, or at other locations, shall meet the quality standards of this part in effect on the date of inspection.
( 3 ) A foreign-produced peanut lot entered for consumption or for warehouse may be transferred or sold to another person: *Provided,* That the original importer shall be the importer of record unless the new owner applies for bond and files Customs Service documents pursuant to 19 CFR 141.113 and 141.20: *And provided further,* That such peanuts must be certified and reported to USDA pursuant to § 996.71 of this part.
( 4 ) The provisions of this section do not supersede any restrictions or prohibitions on peanuts under the Federal Plant Quarantine Act of 1912, the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, any other applicable laws, or regulations of other Federal agencies, including import regulations and procedures of the Customs Service.
[67 FR 57140, Sept. 9, 2002, as amended at 68 FR 1158, Jan. 9, 2003; 81 FR 50289, Aug. 1, 2016]
#### § 981.16 To handle.

*To handle* means to use almonds commercially of own production or to sell, consign, transport, ship (except as a common carrier of almonds owned by another) or in any other way to put almonds grown in the area of production into any channel of trade for human consumption worldwide, either within the area of production or by transfer from the area of production to points outside or by receipt as first receiver at any point of entry in the United States or Puerto Rico of almonds grown in the area of production, exported therefrom and submitted for reentry or which are reentered free of duty. However, sales or deliveries by a grower to handlers, hullers or other processors within the area of production shall not, in itself, be considered as handling by a grower.

[61 FR 32920, June 26, 1996]
H. Res. 1089

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 6, 2006.

Whereas Milton Friedman earned a degree in economics from 

Rutgers University, and later earned a master’s degree 

from the University of Chicago and a doctorate degree 

from Columbia University; 

Whereas Doctor Milton Friedman is widely regarded as the 

leader of the Chicago School of economics, and the developer of the theory of monetarism that stresses the central 

importance of the quantity of money as an instrument of 

government policy and as a determinant of business cycles and inflation; 

Whereas Doctor Friedman’s writings and ideas have influenced Presidents, other world leaders, entrepreneurs, and 

students of economics, and he gave himself generously to 

public service as an economic adviser to Senator Barry 

Goldwater’s campaign for the presidency in 1964, Richard Nixon’s presidential campaign in 1968, the Nixon 

Administration, Ronald Reagan’s 1980 presidential campaign, and the Reagan Administration as a member of 

President Reagan’s Economic Policy Advisory Board; 

Whereas Doctor Friedman is a 1976 Nobel Laureate economist and received the John Bates Clark Medal in 1951 

honoring the top economists under the age of forty, the 

Grand Cordon of the First Class Order of the Sacred 
2

•HRES 1089 EH 

Treasure by the Japanese government in 1986, the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 1988, the National Medal 

of Science in 1988, and honorary degrees from universities in the United States, Japan, Israel, and Guatemala; 

Whereas Doctor Friedman’s ideas were the model for the free 

market reforms undertaken in eastern European countries as they emerged from communist domination in the 

early 1990s, helping extend the blessings of prosperity to 

millions who had long been denied them; 

Whereas Doctor Friedman was a prolific producer of both 

scholarly and popular articles, essays, books, and broadcast media, including the books Capitalism and Freedom

and Free to Choose, tri-weekly columns for Newsweek, 

commentaries in the Wall Street Journal, and two multipart Public Broadcasting Service television series; 

Whereas Doctor Friedman was one of the world’s foremost 

champions of liberty, not just in economics but in all respects; 

Whereas Doctor Friedman will be remembered both as one of 

the most influential economists in history and as one of 

the twentieth century’s greatest heroes of freedom; and 

Whereas Doctor Milton Friedman died on November 16, 

2006, in San Francisco, California, at the age of 94 of 

heart failure: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives, on the occasion of the death of Doctor Milton Friedman—

(1) mourns Doctor Friedman’s passing and expresses its deepest condolences to his family, including 

his widow Rose Friedman, who is herself an accom-
3

•HRES 1089 EH 

plished economist and was instrumental in co-authoring 

some of his major works; and 

(2) honors Doctor Friedman’s lifetime of achievements and recognizes his outstanding contributions to 

freedom, the study of economics, the United States of 

America, and the world. 

Attest:

Clerk.
#### § 996.8 Incoming inspection.

*Incoming inspection* means the sampling, inspection, and certification of farmers stock peanuts to determine segregation and grade quality.
#### § 920.68 Derogation.

Nothing contained in this part is, or shall be construed to be, in derogation or in modification of the rights of the Secretary or of the United States (a) to exercise any powers granted by the act or otherwise, or (b) in accordance with such powers, to act in the premises whenever such action is deemed advisable.
Editorial Note on Part 57
Editorial Note: 1. At 63 FR 69969, Dec. 17, 1998, part 57 was added by duplicating portions of part 59. At 63 FR 72353, Dec. 31, 1998, part 59 was redesignated as part 590 of 9 CFR. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 57 appear at 63 FR 69971, Dec. 17, 1998.

§ 57.925 Inspection of imported eggs. ( a ) Except as provided in § 57.960, eggs offered for importation from any foreign country shall be subject to inspection in accordance with established inspection procedures, including the examination of the labeling information on the containers, by an inspector before the product shall be admitted into the United States. Importers will be advised of the point where inspection will be made, and in case of small shipments (less than carload lots), the importer may be required to move the product to the location of the nearest inspector.
( b ) Inspectors may take samples, without cost to the United States, of any product offered for importation that is subject to quality determination, except that samples shall not be taken of any products offered for importation under § 57.960, unless there is reason for suspecting the presence therein of a substance in violation of that section.
[63 FR 69968, 69971, Dec. 17, 1998, as amended at 69 FR 57168, Sept. 24, 2004]
#### § 966.29 Acceptance.

Any person selected as a committee member or alternate shall qualify by filing a written acceptance with the Secretary within ten days after being notified of such selection.
Alicia Klepfer- EPA Carbon Hearing Testimony- Chicago, IL- 5/24/12 

My name is Alicia Klepfer and I would like to thank the EPA for holding this hearing and 

giving me the opportunity to testify in favor of the proposed carbon standards for new coal 

plants. 

I am the Director of the University of Chicago Climate Action Network, or UCAN. Earlier this 

year, our group gathered a panel of speakers to discuss solutions for climate change. Over 

100 students attended our event and gathered to listen as a politician, an economist, a solar 

energy company founder, and a Sierra Club organizer told the room that there are ways to 

combat the growing amounts of green house gases in our atmosphere. 

They all identified challenges in that fight, but the one common thread among all4 

speakers was that change is not possible without government regulation to stand behind 

our determination. Currently, there are no regulations or limits on how much carbon can 

be released into the air from coal plants. There are no regulations even though carbon is 

proven to be one of the leading factors of climate change. 

I tried to explain that to one of the 3'd grade students that I tutor here in Chicago. To 

explain that to a 9 year old, I had to tell him that to make electricity the power plants 

needed to burn fossil fuels, but there aren't any restrictions on how much smoke and other 

things is released even though we have the technology to prevent it. Simplified and 

stripped of propaganda from greedy energy companies, this system of profit without 

respect for externalities is illogical and irresponsible. 

Coal plant pollution is unnecessary and should be prevented with green technology and 

energy replacements. Without carbon standards, we prove ourselves to be shortsighted 

and ignorant. If we can't see the carbon and it doesn't cost us any money, why worry about 

it? But temperature fluctuations and ocean acidification prove that carbon pollution is a 

very real and very harmful phenomenon. 

Even within the city of Chicago, carbon is also proving to be more than a climate issue. As 

I'm sure you've heard, carbon pollution makes many other times of air pollution more 

severe, such as mercury and soot. But as a student in Chicago who grew up in Colorado, I 

never had to worry about dirty air. I got to see clear skies and snowy mountain peaks while 

I ran outside and played, never seeing hazy air from smog. It wasn't until I came to Chicago 

and got chronic sinus infections that I realized I was literally allergic to the polluted air 

within the city. 

I will be 20 in july, which means I hopefully have another 70 or 80 years on this planet. I 

must admit, as a nerdy UChicago student, I am a fan of science fiction and fantasy. So a 

world with a dead ocean, rising sea levels, blistering summers, and freezing winters sounds 

like some cool story set-up in a book I'd read. When I think about doing that to my planet, 

though, it makes me feel sick. I don't want to do that to my planet, and I sincerely hope the 

EPA will pass it's proposed carbon standards.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

J uly 1 2 , 2017 

# Order

Clerk July 1 2 , 2017

15 5 588 ( 84 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN

, Plaintiff

- Appell ee

, SC: 15 5 588

v COA: 3 29038, 329101, 329109

Wayne CC : 15

- 001414

- FC

15

- 001416

- FC

1 5

- 001415

- FC

ANDRE HAYNES,

Defendant

- Appell ant

.

___________________________ __ _______ _ /

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of defendant

- appellant to extend the time

for filing his reply is GRANTED. The reply submitted on May 24 , 2017

, is accepted for

filing

.
#### § 51.753 U.S. No. 1 Golden.

The requirements for this grade are the same as for U.S. No. 1 except that not more than 30 percent, by count, of the fruit shall have more than one-third of their surface, in the aggregate, affected by discoloration. For tolerances see § 51.760.
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 72 Filed 07/26/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### § 915.24 Failure to nominate.

If nominations are not made within the time and in the manner prescribed in § 915.22, the Secretary may, without regard to nominations, select the members and alternate members of the committee on the basis of the representation provided for in § 915.20.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
  (1)
    
    the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Periodic
Report) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Patriot Coal Corporation.
  /s/ Richard M. WhitingRichard M. WhitingChief Executive Officer
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 19 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 19 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 19 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT



|                                         |  |                             
|---------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary                       |  | Jurisdiction of Organization
|Allied VGH Inc.(1)                       |  | Nevada                      
|Allied VNC Inc.(2)                       |  | Nevada                      
|Victory Gold Inc.(2)                     |  | Nevada                      
|Victory Exploration Inc.(3)              |  | Nevada                      
|Hycroft Resources & Development, Inc.(2) |  | Nevada                      
|Hycroft Lewis Mine, Inc.(4)              |  | Nevada                      
|Allied Nevada Gold Holdings LLC(1)       |  | Nevada                      



| | (1) | 100% owned by Allied Nevada Gold Corp.
| | --- | --------------------------------------

| | (2) | 100% owned by Allied VGH Inc.
| | --- | -----------------------------

| | (3) | 100% owned by Victory Gold Inc.
| | --- | -------------------------------

| | (4) | 100% owned by Hycroft Resources & Development, Inc.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------
Case 3:06-cv-00713-MHT-SRW Document 35 Filed 10/02/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Lewis G. Gaines et al., as Executors of Isidor Jaffe, Deceased, Respondents-Appellants. Shirley Kahn et al., Appellants-Respondents; W. Donald Nyland, Special Guardian, Respondent-Appellant.

Decree entered July 3, 1968, from which cross appeals are taken by the respective parties, modified on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion in the following particulars: The executors are personally surcharged for the full amount of the special guardian’s fee, the legacies to the infant wards (children of the object ants) with interest as specified in the decree, and with such amounts as are due to creditors and tax authorities by the executors on behalf of the estate. • The executors could not by agreement divest themselves of their legal responsibilities, particularly to the infant legatees. We also specifically affirm the determination of the learned Surrogate with respect to the agreement dated *753November 28,1958, but modify the decree to reduce the liability of the objeetants to the petitioners by the sum of $2,000, payments previously made on account of attorney’s fees and executors’ commissions, and the additional sum of $600 representing 10% of the fee of the special guardian for work done and effort expended, made necessary solely by reason of certain acts or derelictions of the executors for which they alone are responsible, and which, properly, the objeetants should not be bound to indemnify the executors. As so modified the decree appealed from is otherwise affirmed, with a single bill of costs and disbursements to the special guardian only against the objeetants and the petitioners. Settle order on notice. Concur —Stevens, P. J., Capozzoli, McGivern, Markewich and McNally, JJ.
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-15-00273-CR

____________________

EX PARTE TIMOTHY SCOTT WEEKS

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 15-28805 

________________________________________________________ _____________

ORDER

The appellant, Timothy Scott Weeks, filed an unopposed motion to abate the 

appeal and to remand the case to the trial court for preparation of written findings 

of fact and conclusions of law. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.072, § 7(a) 

(West 2015).

It is, therefore, ORDERED that the appeal is abated and the case is 

remanded to the trial court for entry of findings of fact and conclusions of law. 

The trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law shall be included in a 

supplemental clerk’s record and filed with the Court of Appeals by September 21, 
2

2015. The appeal will be reinstated without further order of the Court when the 

supplemental clerk’s record is filed. The brief of the appellant is due twenty days 

after the supplemental clerk’s record is filed.

ORDER ENTERED August 20, 2015.

 PER CURIAM

 

Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.