<PAGE>

                                  UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                          ----------------------------

                                    FORM 10-Q


[X]      QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
                                  ACT OF 1934

               For the quarterly period ended: SEPTEMBER 30, 2009

                                       OR

[ ]      TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
                                  ACT OF 1934

                   For the transition period from ___ to ____

                         Commission File Number 0-31012

                         UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY
           (NAME OF SMALL BUSINESS ISSUER AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)

          CALIFORNIA                                     95-2746949
--------------------------------            ------------------------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of             (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 incorporation or organization)


    340 NORTH CAMDEN DRIVE, SUITE 302
        BEVERLY HILLS, CALIFORNIA                        90210
----------------------------------------    ------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices)              (Zip Code)


                    Issuer's telephone number: (310) 248-3655

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. YES [X] NO [_]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and
posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required
to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (ss. 232.405
of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that
the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES [XX_] NO [_]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of "accelerated
filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
one): Large accelerated filer |_| Accelerated filer |_| Non-accelerated filer
|_| Smaller reporting company |X|

Check whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [ X ]

Number of shares outstanding as of November 13, 2009: 959,885,733 common shares.

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format: Yes [ ] No [ X ]


<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S>     <C>

                                              FORM 10-Q

                                                INDEX

                                                                                               PAGE NO.
                                                                                               --------
PART I.     FINANCIAL
            INFORMATION
            Item 1.             Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) :          3
                                Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements               7

            Item 2.             Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
                                and Results of Operations.                                         16

            Item 3.             Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.        24

            Item 4T.            Controls and Procedures.                                           24

PART II.    OTHER INFORMATION
            Item 1.             Legal Proceedings                                                  25

            Item 1A             Risk Factors                                                       25

            Item 2.             Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds        26

            Item 3.             Defaults Upon Senior Securities                                    26

            Item 4.             Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders                27

            Item 5.             Other Information                                                  27

            Item 6.             Exhibits                                                           27

SIGNATURES                                                                                         28

                                                      2

<PAGE>

                                                    PART I
                                             FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


                                UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                          CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
                                AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND DECEMBER 31, 2008
                                                  (UNAUDITED)

                                                    ASSETS
                                                                       SEPTEMBER 30, 2009     DECEMBER 31, 2008
                                                                       ------------------     -----------------
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents                                              $     10,131           $      1,910
Restricted cash                                                                --                   10,477
Accounts Receivable, net                                                      3,626                  1,058
Prepaid expenses                                                              3,044                  3,666
                                                                       ------------           ------------

Total current assets                                                         16,801                 17,111

Deposits                                                                     21,300                 10,226
Equipment, net                                                               17,185                 32,946
Patent, net                                                                  79,939                 84,008
                                                                       ------------           ------------

Total assets                                                           $    135,225           $    144,291
                                                                       ============           ============


                                     LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable, trade                                                $  1,080,641           $  1,030,865
Accrued liabilities                                                         502,020                480,126
Accrued payroll - officers                                                  475,774                809,136
Notes payable - related party                                                64,853                 10,325
Notes payable                                                             1,216,373              1,630,711
Accrued interest expense                                                    631,676                657,110
                                                                       ------------           ------------

Total current liabilities                                                 3,971,337              4,618,273

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 20,000,000 shares
     authorized, -0- issued and outstanding                                    --                     --
Common stock, no par value, 20,000,000,000 shares
     authorized, 870,559,903 shares issued and outstanding as of
     September 30, 2009 and 35,286,671 shares issued and outstanding
     as of December 31, 2008                                             33,040,943             28,823,641
Additional paid-in-capital                                                5,313,089              5,313,089
Accumulated deficit                                                     (42,190,144)           (38,610,712)
                                                                       ------------           ------------

Total stockholders' deficit                                              (3,836,112)            (4,473,982)
                                                                       ------------           ------------

Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit                            $    135,225           $    144,291
                                                                       ============           ============


                    See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

                                                      3

<PAGE>

                           UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                    FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
                                             (UNAUDITED)

                                                                    2009               2008
                                                               -------------       -------------

REVENUE, NET                                                   $      19,897       $     108,830
COST OF GOODS SOLD                                                    11,444              76,560
                                                               -------------       -------------

GROSS PROFIT                                                           8,453              32,270
                                                               -------------       -------------

OPERATING EXPENSES:
Selling, general and administrative                                1,030,087           1,183,822
Consulting                                                           962,293              24,974
Depreciation and amortization                                         19,831              22,599
                                                               -------------       -------------

Total expenses                                                     2,012,211           1,231,395
                                                               -------------       -------------

LOSS FROM OPERATIONS                                              (2,003,758)         (1,199,125)

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
Interest income                                                           13                 105
Interest expense                                                     (89,557)           (142,367)
Penalties                                                               --                   (10)
Loss on settlement of debt                                        (1,486,130)           (538,370)
                                                               -------------       -------------

Total other expenses                                              (1,575,674)           (680,642)
                                                               -------------       -------------

NET LOSS                                                       $  (3,579,432)      $  (1,879,768)
                                                               =============       =============

NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE - BASIC AND DILUTED:               $       (0.01)      $       (0.17)
                                                               =============       =============

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING             310,572,145          10,808,354
                                                               =============       =============

Weighted average number of dilutive securities has not been calculated as the
effect of dilutive securities would be anti-dilutive

               See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

                                                   4

<PAGE>

                      UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY AND SUBSIDIARIES
                           CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
               FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
                                        (UNAUDITED)

                                                               2009               2008
                                                          -------------       -------------

REVENUE, NET                                              $       4,415       $      45,660
COST OF GOODS SOLD                                                9,576              58,355
                                                          -------------       -------------

GROSS PROFIT                                                     (5,161)            (12,695)
                                                          -------------       -------------

OPERATING EXPENSES:

Selling, general and administrative                             554,895             439,573
Consulting                                                      907,368              17,038
Depreciation and amortization                                     4,764               7,533
                                                          -------------       -------------

Total expenses                                                1,467,027             464,144
                                                          -------------       -------------

LOSS FROM OPERATIONS                                         (1,472,188)           (476,839)

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
Interest income                                                       1                   3
Interest expense                                                (12,276)            (51,730)
Loss on settlement of debt                                   (1,058,889)           (117,795)
                                                          -------------       -------------

Total other expenses                                         (1,071,164)           (169,522)
                                                          -------------       -------------

NET LOSS                                                  $  (2,543,352)      $    (646,361)
                                                          =============       =============

NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE - BASIC AND DILUTED:          $       (0.00)      $       (0.04)
                                                          =============       =============

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING        614,930,050          16,319,224
                                                          =============       =============

Weighted average number of dilutive securities has not been calculated as the
effect of dilutive securities would be anti-dilutive

          See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

                                            5

<PAGE>

                           UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                    FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
                                             (UNAUDITED)

                                                                          2009               2008
                                                                       -----------       -----------

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss                                                               $(3,579,432)      $(1,879,768)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operations:
Stocks issued for services                                               1,692,124           570,274
Loss on settlement of debt                                               1,486,130           538,370
Depreciation and amortization                                               19,831            22,599
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Deposits                                                                   (11,074)             --
Accounts receivable                                                         (2,569)            2,855
Prepaid expenses                                                               622            10,826
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities                                  (172,133)          334,418
                                                                       -----------       -----------

Net cash used in operating activities                                     (566,501)         (400,427)
                                                                       -----------       -----------

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
(Increase)/Decrease in restricted cash                                      10,477               (98)
                                                                       -----------       -----------

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from notes payable-related party                                  103,645            12,350
Proceeds from notes payable                                                509,716           501,500
Payments on notes payable - related party                                  (49,116)          (78,373)
Payments on notes payable                                                     --             (43,009)
                                                                       -----------       -----------

Net cash provided by  financing activities                                 564,245           392,468
                                                                       -----------       -----------


NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS                         8,221            (8,056)

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD                               1,910             9,555
                                                                       -----------       -----------

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD                               $    10,131       $     1,499
                                                                       ===========       ===========

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:

Income tax                                                             $      --         $      --
                                                                       ===========       ===========
Interest Paid                                                          $      --         $     1,516
                                                                       ===========       ===========

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES FOR NON CASH INVESTING AND
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

Shares issued for settlement of debt and accrued interest              $ 2,522,205       $   812,353
                                                                       ===========       ===========

            See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
</TABLE>
                                            6

<PAGE>

                 UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY AND SUBSIDIARIES
              NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                               SEPTEMBER 30, 2009



NOTE 1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared
by Universal Detection Technology and Subsidiaries., pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") Form 10-Q and
Item 310 of Regulation S-K, and generally accepted accounting principles for
interim financial reporting. The information furnished herein reflects all
adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals and adjustments) that are,
in the opinion of management, necessary to fairly present the operating results
for the respective periods. Certain information and footnote disclosures
normally present in annual consolidated financial statements prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America have been omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. These
consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited
consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K. The results of the three and nine months ended September
30, 2009, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the
full year ending December 31, 2009.

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

STOCK SPLIT

On July 25, 2008, the Company affected a reverse stock split of their common
stock. The reverse split was affected on a one-for-two hundred basis, resulting
in 14,211,953 shares outstanding immediately following the stock split. All
common stock numbers in this Current Report on Form 10-Q, have been
retroactively restated for the effect of the reverse split.

GOING CONCERN

As of September 30, 2009, the Company had a working capital deficit of
$3,954,536 and an accumulated deficit of $42,190,144. The Company incurred a net
loss of $3,579,432 for the nine month period ended September 30, 2009. These
conditions raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going
concern. Its ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its
ability to develop additional sources of capital and ultimately achieve
profitable operations. The financial statements do not include any adjustments
that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. The Company's financial
statements have been presented on the basis that it is a going concern, which
contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in
the normal course of business.

During the first nine months of 2009, the Company sold detection kits under
various purchase agreements and had consulting revenue for $19,897. The Company
also entered into various agreements to issue 558,262,972 shares of its common
stock to third parties in order to convert outstanding debt to the respective
parties. The value of the stock issued in consideration for the debt conversion
was $2,522,205.

                                       7

<PAGE>

                 UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY AND SUBSIDIARIES
              NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                               SEPTEMBER 30, 2009


RECLASSIFICATION

Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year balances to conform
to the current year presentation.

REVENUE RECOGNITION

The Company's revenue recognition policies are in compliance with ASC 605
(previously Staff accounting bulletin (SAB) 104). Sales revenue is recognized at
the date of shipment to customers when a formal arrangement exists, the price is
fixed or determinable, the delivery is completed, no other significant
obligations of the Company exist and collectability is reasonably assured.
Payments received before all of the relevant criteria for revenue recognition
are satisfied are recorded as unearned revenue.

USE OF ESTIMATES IN THE PREPARATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make certain estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant
estimates include collectability of accounts receivable, accounts payable, sales
returns and recoverability of long-term assets.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In June 2009, the FASB issued ASC 105 (previously SFAS No. 168, THE FASB
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS CODIFICATION AND THE HIERARCHY OF GENERALLY ACCEPTED
ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES ("GAAP") - A REPLACEMENT OF FASB STATEMENT NO. 162), which
will become the source of authoritative accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States recognized by the FASB to be applied to nongovernmental
entities. The Codification is effective in the third quarter of 2009, and
accordingly, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September
30, 2009 and all subsequent public filings will reference the Codification as
the sole source of authoritative literature. The Company does not believe that
this will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued amended standards for determining whether to
consolidate a variable interest entity. These amended standards eliminate a
mandatory quantitative approach to determine whether a variable interest gives
the entity a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity in
favor of a qualitatively focused analysis, and require an ongoing reassessment
of whether an entity is the primary beneficiary. These amended standards are
effective for us beginning in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 and we are
currently evaluating the impact that adoption will have on our consolidated
financial statements.

                                       8

<PAGE>

                 UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY AND SUBSIDIARIES
              NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                               SEPTEMBER 30, 2009


In June 2009, the FASB issued ASC 855 (previously SFAS No. 165, SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS), which establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosures
of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before the financial
statements are issued or available to be issued. It is effective for interim and
annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. There was no material impact upon the
adoption of this standard on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In August 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2009-05,
which amends ASC Topic 820, MEASURING LIABILITIES AT FAIR VALUE, which provides
additional guidance on the measurement of liabilities at fair value. These
amended standards clarify that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an
active market for the identical liability is not available, we are required to
use the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset, quoted
prices for similar liabilities, or quoted prices for similar liabilities when
traded as assets. If these quoted prices are not available, we are required to
use another valuation technique, such as an income approach or a market
approach. These amended standards are effective for us beginning in the fourth
quarter of fiscal year 2009 and are not expected to have a significant impact on
our consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 3 - PATENTS

As of September 30, 2009, and December 31, 2008, the patent value is as follows:


                                         September 30, 2009    December 31, 2008
                                         ------------------    -----------------
Patent Costs                                     $ 117,341            $ 117,341
Accumulated Amortization                           (37,402)             (33,333)
                                                 ---------            ---------
Patent, Net                                      $  79,939            $  84,008
                                                 =========            =========

Total amortization expense was $4,069 and $4,054 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 respectively.


NOTE 4 - NOTES PAYABLE

During the first quarter of 2009, the Company borrowed an aggregate of $92,000
from third parties under various promissory note agreements. The promissory
notes all bear interest at 12.0% per annum, and are due on or before February
11, 2011. No interest or principal payments have been made on the notes.

During the second quarter of 2009, the Company borrowed an aggregate of $318,887
from third parties under various promissory note agreements. The promissory
notes all bear interest at 12.0% per annum, and are due on or before June 29,
2011. No principal or interest payments have been made on these notes.

                                       9

<PAGE>

                 UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY AND SUBSIDIARIES
              NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                               SEPTEMBER 30, 2009


During the third quarter of 2009, the Company borrowed an aggregate of $138,829
from third parties under various promissory note agreements. The promissory
notes all bear interest at 12.0% per annum, and are due on or before September
15, 2011. No principal or interest payments have been made on these notes.

As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company had total notes
payable of $1,216,373 and $1,630,711.


NOTE 5 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company was involved in the following litigations:

a)   A. Sean Rose, Claire F. Rose and Mark Rose v. Universal Detection
     Technology, fka Pollution Research and Control Corporation (Superior Court
     of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, North Central
     District, Case No. EC042040)

     On or about April 16, 2004, Plaintiffs commenced an action against the
     Company (Case No. EC 038824) for amounts allegedly due pursuant to four
     unpaid promissory notes. On August 2, 2004, the parties executed a
     Confidential Settlement Agreement and Mutual Releases (the "AGREEMENT"). On
     December 30, 2005, Plaintiffs commenced the above-referenced action against
     the Company, alleging the Company breached the Agreement and seeking
     approximately $205,000 in damages. A judgment was entered on April 11,
     2006. As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company has
     accrued $495,118 and $456,607 respectively for this settlement including
     principal and interest.

b)   On June 2, 2006, Plaintiff Trilogy Capital Partners instituted an action in
     the Los Angeles Superior Court (TRILOGY CAPITAL PARTNERS V. UNIVERSAL
     DETECTION TECHNOLOGY, ET. AL., Case No. SC089929) against the Company.
     Plaintiff's Complaint alleged damages against UDT for breach of an
     engagement letter in the amount of $93,449. Also, Plaintiff alleged that
     UDT had failed to issue warrants to it pursuant to a written agreement.
     After completing the initial stages of litigation and conducting extensive
     mediation, Plaintiff and UDT reached a settlement wherein commencing
     December 15, 2006, UDT would make monthly payments to Plaintiff of $2,000
     until a debt of $90,000 plus accrued interest at six percent per annum was
     fully paid. In exchange, Plaintiff would release all of its claims against
     UDT. UDT has been current on all of its agreed payments to Plaintiff. As of
     September 30, 2009, $48,357 was due under the agreement.

c)   On November 15, 2006, Plaintiff NBGI, Inc. instituted an action in the
     Los Angeles Superior Court (NBGI, Inc. v. Universal Detection Technology,
     et. al., Case No. BC361979) against the Company. NBGI, Inc.'s Complaint
     alleged breach of contract, and requested damages in the amount of $111,014
     plus interest at the legal rate and for costs of suit. UDT strongly
     disputes and shall vigorously defend against the allegations of the
     Complaint. To date, discovery has commenced, and trial has been set for
     October 29, 2007. There is also a Motion for Summary Judgment set for
     September 11, 2007. The Summary Judgment was granted in NBGI's favor, and
     Judgment has been entered.

                                       10

<PAGE>

                 UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY AND SUBSIDIARIES
              NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                               SEPTEMBER 30, 2009


d)   On June 23, 2009, California Institute of Technology ("Cal Tech") sent a
     letter to Universal Detection Technology ("UDT"), asserting certain
     breaches by UDT of that certain License Agreement between Cal Tech and UDT
     effective September 30, 2009 as amended (the "License Agreement") including
     nonpayment of royalties, failure to pay certain prosecution and legal costs
     and failure to fully commercialize the patents and technologies that are
     licensed to UDT under the License Agreement. Cal Tech is also asserting its
     right to terminate the License Agreement effective June 4, 2009. UDT
     disagrees with the various assertions made by Cal Tech in the letter and
     has requested that Cal Tech submit to arbitration all matters in dispute.
     To date, no further action has been taken and UDT continues to perform
     under the License Agreement. However, there can be no assurance that the
     License Agreement will continue in effect, or that UDT will be able to
     continue the use, development and commercialization of the underlying
     patents and technologies. Primarily the License Agreement concerns a group
     of patents that support UDT's "BSM" technologies and related products. The
     loss of these licensed technologies would have an adverse effect on UDT's
     prospects until such time as alternate technologies are licensed or
     developed.

From time to time, the Company is a party to a number of lawsuits arising in the
normal course of business. In the opinion of management, the resolution of these
matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's operations,
cash flows or financial position.


NOTE 6- STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

During the three month period ended September 30, 2009, the Company issued an
aggregate of 21,258,010 shares of common stock to employees for services
rendered to the Company. The Company recorded the expense at the fair market
value of the shares of $295,683.

During the three month period ended September 30, 2009, the Company issued
106,700,000 shares of common stock as payment for consulting or other
professional fees for an aggregate amount of $927,200.

During the three month period ended September 30, 2009, the Company entered
various agreements to convert $526,978 of indebtedness into 307,457,792 shares
of common stock. The fair market value of the stock on the date of agreement and
issuances was $1,585,867. The Company recorded a loss on settlement of debt of
$1,058,889.

During the three month period ended June 30, 2009, the Company issued an
aggregate of 138,031,826 shares of common stock to employees for services
rendered to the Company. The Company recorded the expense at the fair market
value of the shares of $427,233.

                                       11

<PAGE>

                 UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY AND SUBSIDIARIES
              NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                               SEPTEMBER 30, 2009


During the three month period ended June 30, 2009, the Company issued 7,832,924
shares of common stock as payment for consulting or other professional fees for
an aggregate amount of $32,329.

During the three month period ended June 30, 2009, the Company entered various
agreements to convert $356,699 of indebtedness into 210,073,930 shares of common
stock. The fair market value of the stock on the date of agreement and issuances
was $746,882. The Company recorded a loss on settlement of debt of $390,185.

During the three month period ended March 31, 2009, the Company issued 3,187,500
shares of common stock as payment for consulting or other professional fees for
an aggregate amount of $12,451.

During the three month period ended March 31, 2009, the Company entered various
agreements to convert $152,400 of indebtedness into 40,731,250 shares of common
stock. The fair market value of the stock on the date of agreement & issuance
was $189,456. The Company recorded a loss on settlement of debt of $37,056.


COMMON STOCK PURCHASE WARRANTS AND OPTIONS

From time to time, the Company issues options and warrants as incentives to
employees, officers and directors, as well as to non-employees.


STOCK OPTION PLAN

On February 11, 2008, the Board of Directors adopted the 2008 Equity Incentive
Plan (the "Plan"). The Plan provides for the granting of Nonqualified Stock
Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights (or SARs),
Restricted Stock, Performance Units, and Performance Shares, to our employees,
officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other
service providers, provided that such services are not in connection with the
offer and sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction. The Company
reserved 1,500,000 shares of its common stock for awards to be made under the
Plan. 1,499,955 shares reserved under this plan have been issued.

On April 29, 2008, the Board of Directors adopted the 2008-2 Equity Incentive
Plan (the "Plan"). The Plan provides for the granting of Nonqualified Stock
Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights (or SARs),
Restricted Stock, Performance Units, and Performance Shares, to our employees,
officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other
service providers, provided that such services are not in connection with the
offer and sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction. The Company
initially reserved 1,650,000 shares of its common stock for awards to be made
under the Plan. 1,634,270 of the shares reserved under this plan have been
issued.

                                       12

<PAGE>

                 UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY AND SUBSIDIARIES
              NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                               SEPTEMBER 30, 2009


On July 1, 2008, the Board of Directors adopted the 2008-3 Equity Incentive Plan
(the "Plan"). The Plan provides for the granting of the nonqualified Stock
Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights (or SARs),
Restricted Stock, Performance Units, and Performance Shares, to their employees,
officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other
service providers, provided that such services are not in connection with the
offer and sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction. The Company
initially reserved 2,500,000 shares of its common stock for awards to be made
under the Plan. 2,500,000 of the shares reserved under this plan have been
issued.

On September 2, 2008, the Board of Directors adopted the 2008-4 Equity Incentive
Plan (the "Plan"). The Plan provides for the granting of the nonqualified Stock
Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights (or SARs).
Restricted Stock, Performance Units, and Performance Shares, to their employees,
officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other
service provider, provided that such services are not in connection with the
offer and sale of securities in a capital raising transactions. The company
initially reserved 3,800,000 shares of its common stock for awards to be made
under the Plan. 3,800,000 of the shares reserved under this plan have been
issued.

On February 15, 2009, the Board of Directors adopted the 2009 Equity Incentive
Plan (the "Plan.") The Plan provides for the granting of the nonqualified Stock
Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights (or SARs),
Restricted Stock, Performance Units, and Performance Shares, to their employees,
officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other
service providers, provided that such services are no it connection with the
offer and sale of securities in a capital raising transactions. The company
initially reserved 10,000,000 shares of its common stock for awards to be made
under the Plan. 10,000,000 of the shares reserved under this plan have been
issued.

On May 15, 2009, the Board of Directors adopted the 2009-2 Equity Incentive Plan
(The "Plan".) The Plan provides for the granting of the nonqualified Stock
Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights (or SARs),
Restricted Stock, Performance Units, and Performance Shares, to their employees,
officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other
service providers, provided that such services are not in connection with the
offer and sale of securities in a capital raising transaction. The Company
initially reserved 60,000,000 shares of its common stock for awards to be made
under the Plan. 20,457,250 of the shares under this plan have been issued.

On November 6, 2009, the Board of Directors adopted the 2009-3 Equity Incentive
Plan (The "Plan".) The Plan provides for the granting of the nonqualified Stock
Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights (or SARs),
Restricted Stock, Performance Units, and Performance Shares, to their employees,
officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other
service providers, provided that such services are not in connection with the
offer and sale of securities in a capital raising transaction. The Company
initially reserved 60,000,000 shares of its common stock for awards to be made
under the Plan. 20,457,250 of the shares under this plan have been issued.

                                       13

<PAGE>

                 UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY AND SUBSIDIARIES
              NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                               SEPTEMBER 30, 2009


The Company granted 100,800,000 restricted shares in the three months ended
September 30, 2009. Of the shares granted, 100,000,000 shares vested immediately
and 800,000 shares vest over a six-month period. The Company recognized
marketing expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting periods based on the
market price of their stock on the grant date. The Company recognized $895,956
in marketing expense during the nine months ended September 30, 2009, due to the
restricted shares.

Warrants:

There were no warrants granted during the three month period ended September 30,
2009.

Common stock purchase options and warrants consisted of the following as of
September 30, 2009.

<TABLE>
<S>     <C>
                                                                                            Aggregated
                                                                           Exercise         Intrinsic
                                                          # shares           Price            Value
                                                     ----------------------------------------------------
OPTIONS:
Outstanding and exercisable, December 31, 2008                 539,750     $2 to $66          $        -
     Granted                                                         -                                 -
     Exercised                                                       -                                 -
     Expired                                                         -                                 -
                                                     ------------------                   ---------------
Outstanding and exercisable, September 30, 2009                539,750     $2 to $66          $        -

WARRANTS:
Outstanding and exercisable, December 31, 2008                  53,000     $2 to $140         $        -
     Granted                                                         -                                 -
     Exercised                                                       -                                 -
     Expired                                                   (48,000)                                -
                                                                                          ---------------
                                                     ------------------
Outstanding and exercisable, September 30, 2009                  5,000     $2 to $140         $        -
</TABLE>

Options:

Prior to July 1, 2006, the Company measured stock compensation expense using the
intrinsic value method of accounting in accordance with Accounting Principles
Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, "ACCOUNTING FOR STOCK ISSUED TO EMPLOYEES," and
related interpretations (APB No. 25).

The Company adopted ASC 718 (previously SFAS No. 123-R) effective July 1, 2006
using the modified prospective method. Under this transition method, stock
compensation expense recognized in the six months ended June 30, 2009 includes
compensation expense for all stock-based compensation awards vested during the
six months ended June 30, 2009, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in
accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123-R. As there were no options
granted or vested since the implementation of ASC 718, no expense has been
recorded during the six month period ended June 30, 2009.
Methods of estimating fair value

Under ASC 718 (previously SFAS No. 123-R), the fair value of stock options is
determined using the Black-Scholes model. The Company's expected volatility
assumption is based on the historical volatility of the Company's stock. The
expected life assumption is primarily based on historical exercise patterns and
employee post-vesting termination behavior. The risk-free interest rate for the
expected term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect
at the time of grant. ASC 718 (previously SFAS No. 123-R) requires forfeitures
to be estimated at the time of grant and revised in subsequent periods, if
necessary, if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.

                                       14

<PAGE>

                 UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY AND SUBSIDIARIES
              NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                               SEPTEMBER 30, 2009


NOTE 7 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

During the three months ended September 30, 2009, the Company borrowed an
aggregate of $54,731 in principal with interest rates of 12.0% and repaid
$22,902 in principal payments under various promissory note agreements to its
president and CEO. No interest has been paid under these agreements.

During the three months ended September 30, 2009, the Company borrowed an
aggregate of $776 in principal with interest rates of 12.0% under various
promissory note agreements to its Vice President of Global Strategies. No
principal or interest has been paid on these notes.

During the three months ended June 30, 2009, the Company borrowed an aggregate
of $17,371 in principal with interest rates of 12.0% and repaid $17,371 in
principal payments under various promissory note agreements to its president and
CEO. No interest has been paid under these agreements.

During the three months ended June 30, 2009, the Company issued an aggregate of
12,000,000 shares of common stock directly to its Vice President of Global
Strategies, in connection with the satisfaction of third party debt as
instructed by the note holder. The value of the common stock on the days of
issuance was $35,600.

During the three months ended June 30, 2009 the Company issued an aggregate of
117,386,666 shares of common stock to its president and CEO, in connection with
payment for accrued salary. The value of the common stock on the day of issuance
was $352,160.

During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company borrowed an aggregate
of $4,300 in principal with interest rates of 12.0% and repaid $4,300 in
principal payments under various promissory note agreements to its president and
CEO. No interest has been paid under these agreements

During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company borrowed an aggregate
of $12,998 in principal with interest rates of 12.0% under various promissory
note agreements to its Vice President of Global Strategies. No principal or
interest has been paid on these notes.

During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company issued an aggregate of
11,800,000 shares of common stock directly to its Vice President of Global
Strategies, in connection with the satisfaction of third party debt as
instructed by the note holder. The value of the common stock on the days of
issuance was $46,820.


NOTE 8 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

During October 2009, the Company issued an aggregate of 3,181,818 shares of
common stock to employees for services rendered valued at approximately $18,136.

During October 2009, the Company issued an aggregate of 2,000,000 shares of
common stock to various consultants for services rendered valued at
approximately $15,300.

During October 2009, the Company entered in various agreements to covert
outstanding debt to 83,153,380 shares of common stock valued at approximately
$599,597. The shares were issued in October.

During October 2009, the Company borrowed an aggregate of $20,000 from third
parties under various promissory note agreements. The notes carry interest at
12%. The notes are due on or before October 2010.

During October 2009, the Company borrowed an aggregate of $680 from their
president and CEO under various promissory note agreements. The notes carry
interest at 12%. The notes are due on or before October 2010.

                                       15

<PAGE>

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

THIS QUARTERLY REPORT OF FORM 10-Q, INCLUDING THE FOLLOWING MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS, AND OTHER REPORTS FILED BY THE REGISTRANT FROM TIME TO
TIME WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (COLLECTIVELY THE "FILINGS")
CONTAIN FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS WHICH ARE INTENDED TO CONVEY OUR EXPECTATIONS
OR PREDICTIONS REGARDING THE OCCURRENCE OF POSSIBLE FUTURE EVENTS OR THE
EXISTENCE OF TRENDS AND FACTORS THAT MAY IMPACT OUR FUTURE PLANS AND OPERATING
RESULTS. THESE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS ARE DERIVED, IN PART, FROM VARIOUS
ASSUMPTIONS AND ANALYSES WE HAVE MADE IN THE CONTEXT OF OUR CURRENT BUSINESS
PLAN AND INFORMATION CURRENTLY AVAILABLE TO US AND IN LIGHT OF OUR EXPERIENCE
AND PERCEPTIONS OF HISTORICAL TRENDS, CURRENT CONDITIONS AND EXPECTED FUTURE
DEVELOPMENTS AND OTHER FACTORS WE BELIEVE TO BE APPROPRIATE IN THE
CIRCUMSTANCES. YOU CAN GENERALLY IDENTIFY FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS THROUGH
WORDS AND PHRASES SUCH AS "SEEK", "ANTICIPATE", "BELIEVE", "ESTIMATE", "EXPECT",
"INTEND", "PLAN", "BUDGET", "PROJECT", "MAY BE", "MAY CONTINUE", "MAY LIKELY
RESULT", AND SIMILAR EXPRESSIONS. WHEN READING ANY FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENT YOU
SHOULD REMAIN MINDFUL THAT ALL FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS ARE INHERENTLY
UNCERTAIN AS THEY ARE BASED ON CURRENT EXPECTATIONS AND ASSUMPTIONS CONCERNING
FUTURE EVENTS OR FUTURE PERFORMANCE OF OUR COMPANY, AND ARE SUBJECT TO RISKS,
UNCERTAINTIES, ASSUMPTIONS AND OTHER FACTORS RELATING TO OUR INDUSTRY AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

EACH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENT SHOULD BE READ IN CONTEXT WITH, AND WITH AN
UNDERSTANDING OF, THE VARIOUS OTHER DISCLOSURES CONCERNING OUR COMPANY AND OUR
BUSINESS MADE IN OUR FILINGS. YOU SHOULD NOT PLACE UNDUE RELIANCE ON ANY
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENT AS A PREDICTION OF ACTUAL RESULTS OR DEVELOPMENTS. WE
ARE NOT OBLIGATED TO UPDATE OR REVISE ANY FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENT CONTAINED IN
THIS REPORT TO REFLECT NEW EVENTS OR CIRCUMSTANCES UNLESS AND TO THE EXTENT
REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE LAW.

OVERVIEW

We are engaged in the research, development, and marketing of bioterrorism
detection devices, radiation detectors, and counter terrorism training
references. In August 2002, we entered into a Technology Affiliates Agreement
with NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, commonly referred to as JPL, to develop
technology for our bioterrorism detection equipment. Under the Technology
Affiliates Agreement, JPL developed its proprietary bacterial spore detection
technology and integrated it into our existing aerosol monitoring system,
resulting in a product named BSM-2000. BSM-2000 is designed to provide
continuous unattended monitoring of airborne bacterial spores in large public
places, with real-time automated alert functionality. The device is designed to
detect an increase in the concentration of bacterial spores, which is indicative
of a potential presence of Anthrax.

Our management continues to gain expertise in anti-terrorism techniques and
solutions. Through partnerships with various third parties, we have commenced
sales and marketing of bioterrorism hand held assays, radiation detection
systems, and training references.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2009 we spent an aggregate of
$2,012,211 on selling, general and administrative expenses, research and
development expenses and marketing expenses. This amount represents a 63%
increase over the comparable year-ago period. The increase is principally
attributable to an increase in marketing expenses.

                                       16

<PAGE>

Our working capital deficit at September 30, 2009, was $3,954,536. Our
independent auditors' report, dated August 15, 2009 includes an explanatory
paragraph relating to substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going
concern, due to our working capital deficit at December 31, 2008. We require
approximately $2 million to repay indebtedness in the next 12 months.

We plan to engage more in value added services to complement our bioterrorism
detection technologies. We now supply bioterrorism detection kits capable of
detecting anthrax, ricin, botulinum, plague, and SEBs, radiation detection
systems, and counter-terrorism training references.

We plan to continue expanding our product base and to sell our products to more
users inside and outside the U.S. There is no guarantee that we will succeed in
implementing this strategy or if implemented, that this strategy will be
successful. We plan to seek and find third parties interested in collaborating
on further research and development on BSM-2000. Such research shall be aimed at
making BSM-2000 more user-friendly, developing a less complicated interface and
software, and designing a lighter casing. The ideal third party collaborator
would also assist us in marketing BSM-2000 more aggressively. There is no
guarantee that any such collaborators will be found and, if found, that this
strategy will be successful. The current version of BSM-2000 is functional and
available for sale. To date, we have sold two units to the Government of the
United Kingdom and we intend to develop a more wide-spread use for BSM-2000
through our planned collaborative research, development, sales, and marketing
efforts. On July 28, 2009 we announced that we have been granted a patent from
the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) for BSM-2000. The patent is the
second for the technology licensed from the California Institute of Technology.

On June 23, 2009, California Institute of Technology ("Cal Tech") sent a letter
to the Company asserting certain breaches by the Company of the License
Agreement between Cal Tech and the Company. The Company disagrees with the
various assertions made by Cal Tech in the letter and has requested that Cal
Tech submit to arbitration all matters in dispute. To date, no further action
has been taken and the Company continues to perform under the License Agreement.
However, there can be no assurance that the License Agreement will continue in
effect, or that the Company will be able to continue the use, development and
commercialization of the underlying patents and technologies. Primarily the
License Agreement concerns a group of patents that support the Company's "BSM"
technologies and related products. The loss of these licensed technologies would
have an adverse effect on the Company's prospects until such time as alternate
technologies are licensed or developed. See "Legal Proceedings" under Item 1,
Part II, of this Report.

Results of Operations

The following discussion is included to describe our consolidated financial
position and results of operations. The unaudited consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto contain detailed information that should be
referred to in conjunction with this discussion.

NINE MONTHS ENDED September 30, 2009 COMPARED TO THE NINE MONTHS ENDED September
30, 2008

REVENUE. Total revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was $
19,897, as compared to revenue of $108,830 for the same period in the prior
fiscal year, a decrease of $88,933. The decrease is primarily due to a one-time
sale in 2008.

OPERATING EXPENSES. Total operating expenses for the nine months ended September
30, 2009 were $2,012,211, representing an increase of $780,816. The increase is
principally attributable to an increase in marketing expense. Total selling,
general and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
were $1,030,087 representing a decrease of $153,735 (13%) as compared to the
same period in the prior fiscal year. The decrease is principally attributable
to a decrease in professional fees.

                                       17

<PAGE>

OTHER INCOME(EXPENSE). Other income (expense) amounted to ($1,575,674) for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to ($680,642) for the
corresponding period of the prior year. The change is principally related to
interest accrued on the outstanding notes payable and the loss recognized on the
settlement of shares issued for debt.

NET LOSS. Net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was $3,579,432,
as compared to a net loss of $1,879,768 for the same period in the prior fiscal
year, representing an increase of $1,692,611. The primary reasons for this are
an increase in marketing expense and an increase in loss recognized on the
settlement of shares issued for debt.


LIQUITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

We require approximately $2 million to repay debt and $2 million to execute our
business plan in the next twelve months. We do not anticipate that our cash on
hand is adequate to meet our operating expenses over the next 12 months. Also,
we do not believe we have adequate capital to repay all of our debt currently
due and becoming due in the next 12 months. We anticipate that uses of our
available capital during the next 12 months principally will be for:

     o    administrative expenses, including salaries of officers and other
          employees we plan to hire;

     o    repayment of debt;

     o    sales and marketing;

     o    product testing and manufacturing; and

     o    expenses of professionals, including accountants and attorneys.


Our working capital deficit at September 30, 2009 was $3,954,536. Our
independent auditors' report includes an explanatory paragraph relating to
substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern, due to our
working capital deficit at December 31, 2008. We require approximately $2
million to repay indebtedness including interest in the next 12 months. The
following provides principal terms of our outstanding debt as of September 30,
2009:

o One loan from three family members, each of whom is an unaffiliated party,
evidenced by four promissory notes in the aggregate principal amounts of
$100,000, $50,000, $50,000, and $100,000, each due June 24, 2001 with interest
rates ranging from 11% to 12%. We entered into a settlement agreement in the
third quarter of 2004 with each of these parties. Pursuant to this agreement, at
June 30, 2005, we were required to pay an additional $80,000 as full payment of
our obligations. We did not make this payment and are in default of these notes.
As of September 30, 2009, we have $495,118 accrued for including interest
relating to this matter.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party in the aggregate principal amount of
$195,000 with interest at a rate of 12% per annum. Pursuant to a letter
agreement dated as of August 10, 2004, we entered into a settlement with this
party and agreed to pay a total of $261,000 pursuant to a scheduled payment plan
through July 2005. Additionally, the Company, in September 2004, issued 206,250
shares of common stock upon the conversion of unpaid interest in the aggregate
amount of $33,000. At September 30, 2009, there was $161,000 principal amount
(and $78,010 in interest) remaining on this note. We did not make our scheduled
payment under this note in July 2005, and are in default of this note.

                                       18

<PAGE>

o One loan from an unaffiliated party in the aggregate principal amount of
$98,500, due July 31, 2005, with interest at the rate of 9% per annum. Pursuant
to a letter agreement dated August 10, 2004, between this third party and us, we
agreed to pay a total of $130,800 pursuant to a scheduled payment plan through
July 2005. At September 30, 2009, there was $71,500 principal amount (and
$34,709 in interest) remaining on this note. We did not make our scheduled
payment under this note in July 2005, and are in default of this note.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $100,000 due on March 31, 2006 with an interest
rate of 12% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we owed $43,500 in interest. We
did not make our scheduled payment on March 31, 2006. We have verbally extended
the unpaid note and the due date and other terms are being renegotiated so the
note is not considered in default.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $100,000 due on February 14, 2007 with an interest
rate of 12.5% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we owed $24,798 in principal
and $13,756 in interest. We did not make our scheduled payment on February 14,
2007. We have verbally extended the unpaid note and the due date and other terms
are being renegotiated so the note is not considered in default.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $50,000 due on April 5, 2007 with an interest rate
of 12.5% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we paid off the remaining balance.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $30,000 due on April 13, 2007 with an interest
rate of 12.5% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we paid off the remaining
balance.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $60,000 due on November 1, 2007 with an interest
rate of 12.5% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we owed $2,970 in principal.
We did not make our scheduled payment on November 1, 2007. We have verbally
extended the unpaid note and the due date and other terms are being renegotiated
so the note is not considered in default.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $30,000 due on December 7, 2007 with an interest
rate of 12.5% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we paid off the remaining
balance.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $30,000 due on January 11, 2008 with an interest
rate of 12% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we owed $3,000 in principal and
$270 in interest. We did not make our scheduled payment on January 11, 2008. We
have verbally extended the unpaid note and the due date and other terms are
being renegotiated so the note is not considered in default.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $40,000 due on March 12, 2008 with an interest
rate of 12.5% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we owed $10,000 in principal
and $8,375 in interest. We did not make our scheduled payment on March 12, 2008.
We have verbally extended the unpaid note and the due date and other terms are
being renegotiated so the note is not considered in default.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $40,000 due on April 11, 2008 with an interest
rate of 12.5% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we paid off the remaining
balance.

                                       19

<PAGE>

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $60,000 due on May 30, 2008 with an interest rate
of 12.5% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we paid off the remaining balance.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $20,000 due on July 8, 2008 with an interest rate
of 12.5% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we owed $20,000 in principal and
$4,375 in interest. We did not make our scheduled payment on July 8, 2008. We
have verbally extended the unpaid note and the due date and other terms are
being renegotiated so the note is not considered in default.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $15,000 due on August 4, 2008 with an interest
rate of 12% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we paid off the remaining
balance.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $17,000 due on August 11, 2008 with an interest
rate of 12% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we paid off the remaining
principal balance and owed $1,372 in interest.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $30,000 due on August 27, 2008 with an interest
rate of 12% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we paid off the remaining
balance.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $13,000 due on August 28, 2008 with an interest
rate of 12% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we paid off the remaining
balance.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $13,000 due on September 6, 2008 with an interest
rate of 12.5% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we paid off the remaining
balance.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $20,000 due on April 2, 2009 with an interest rate
of 12.5% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we paid off the remaining balance.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $19,000 due on April 2, 2009 with an interest rate
of 12.5% per annum. As of September 30, 2009 we paid off the remaining balance.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $30,000 due on May 2, 2009 with an interest rate
of 12.5% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we paid off the remaining balance.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $35,000 due on May 6, 2009 with an interest rate
of 12.5% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we paid off the remaining balance.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $50,000 due on June 13, 2009 with an interest rate
of 12.5% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we owed $14,406 in principal and
$1,672 in interest. We did not make our scheduled payment on June 13, 2009. We
have verbally extended the unpaid note and the due date and other terms are
being renegotiated so the note is not considered in default.

                                       20

<PAGE>

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $40,000 due on December 24, 2009 with an interest
rate of 12.5% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we owed $40,000 in principal
and $6,250 in interest.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $35,000 due on July 15, 2009 with an interest rate
of 12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we paid off the remaining balance.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $15,000 due on July 17, 2009 with an interest rate
of 13.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we paid off the remaining balance.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $34,000 due on July 22, 2009 with an interest rate
of 12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we paid off the remaining balance.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $17,000 due on August 5, 2009 with an interest
rate of 10.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we owed $17,000 in principal
and $2,323 in interest. We did not make our scheduled payment on August 5, 2009.
We have verbally extended the unpaid note and the due date and other terms are
being renegotiated so the note is not considered in default.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $23,500 due on August 27, 2009 with an interest
rate of 12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we owed $23,500 in principal
and $3,055 in interest. We did not make our scheduled payment on August 27,
2009. We have verbally extended the unpaid note and the due date and other terms
are being renegotiated so the note is not considered in default.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $55,000 due on August 28, 2009 with an interest
rate of 12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we paid off the remaining
balance.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $25,000 due on November 13, 2009 with an interest
rate of 12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we owed $25,000 in principal
and $2,750 in interest.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $18,000 due on November 18, 2009 with an interest
rate of 12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we owed $18,000 in principal
and $1,800 in interest.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $27,000 due on December 2, 2009 with an interest
rate of 12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we owed $27,000 in principal
and $2,700 in interest.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $30,000 due on December 15, 2009 with an interest
rate of 12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we owed $30,000 in principal
and $2,700 in interest.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $25,000 due on October 9, 2009 with an interest
rate of 12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we owed $25,000 in principal
and $3,000 in interest.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $4,000 due on January 9, 2010 with an interest
rate of 12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we owed $4,000 in principal
and $380 in interest.

                                       21

<PAGE>

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $8,000 due on January 13, 2010 with an interest
rate of 12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we owed $8,000 in principal
and $720 in interest.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $5,000 due on January 16, 2010 with an interest
rate of 12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we owed $5,000 in principal
and $450 in interest.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $33,000 due on January 22, 2010 with an interest
rate of 12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we owed $33,000 in principal
and $2,640 in interest.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $13,000 due on February 11, 2010 with an interest
rate of 12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we owed $13,000 in principal
and $1,040 in interest.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $12,000 due on February 20, 2010 with an interest
rate of 12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we owed $12,000 in principal
and $840 in interest.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $17,000 due on February 11, 2010 with an interest
rate of 12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we owed $17,000 in principal
and $1,360 in interest.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $40,000 due on May 15, 2009. As of September 30,
2009, we paid off the remaining balance.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $12,500 due on April 16, 2011 with an interest
rate of 12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we owed $12,500 in principal
and $688 in interest.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $4,475 due on April 23, 2011 with an interest rate
of 12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we owed $4,475 in principal and
$224 in interest.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $9,000 due on May 1, 2011 with an interest rate of
12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we owed $9,000 in principal and $450
in interest.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $40,000 due on May 6, 2011 with an interest rate
of 12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we owed $40,000 in principal and
$2,000 in interest.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $41,000 due on May 13, 2011 with an interest rate
of 12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we owed $41,000 in principal and
$1,845 in interest.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $52,941 due on May 28, 2011 with an interest rate
of 12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we owed $52,941 in principal and
$2,118 in interest.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $17,450 due on June 4, 2011 with an interest rate
of 12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we owed $17,450 in principal and
$698 in interest.

                                       22

<PAGE>

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $13,677 due on June 16, 2011 with an interest rate
of 12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we owed $13,677 in principal and
$479 in interest.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $23,000 due on June 29, 2011 with an interest rate
of 12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we owed $23,000 in principal.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $18,940 due on June 9, 2011 with an interest rate
of 12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we owed $18,940 in principal and
$758 in interest.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $45,904 due on June 19, 2011 with an interest rate
of 12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we owed $45,904 in principal and
$1,607 in interest.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $30,000 due on August 24, 2010 with an interest
rate of 12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we owed $30,000 in principal
and $300 in interest.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $40,000 due on September 10, 2011 with an interest
rate of 12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we owed $40,000 in principal
and $263 in interest.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $10,000 due on September 15, 2011 with an interest
rate of 12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we owed $10,000 in principal
and $50 in interest.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $29,920 due on August 12, 2010 with an interest
rate of 12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we owed $29,920 in principal
and $449 in interest.

o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the
aggregate principal amount of $25,940 due on July 23, 2011 with an interest rate
of 12.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2009, we owed $25,940 in principal and
$519 in interest.

Management continues to take steps to address the Company's liquidity needs. In
the past, management has entered into agreements with some of our note holders
to amend the terms of our notes to provide for extended scheduled payment
arrangements. Management is engaged in discussions with each holder of debt that
is in default and continues to seek extensions with respect to our debt that is
past due. In addition, management may endeavor to convert some portion of the
principal amount and interest on our debt into shares of common stock. Since
September 2009 we have converted certain debt into 83,153,380 shares of common
stock valued at $599,596.

Historically, we have financed operations through private debt and equity
financings. In recent years, financial institutions have been unwilling to lend
to us, and the cost of obtaining working capital from investors has been
expensive. We principally expect to raise funds through the sale of equity or
debt securities. The more recent price and volume volatility in the common stock
has made it more difficult for management to negotiate sales of its securities
at a price it believes to be fair to the Company. The Company actively continues
to pursue additional equity or debt financings, but cannot provide any assurance
that it will be successful. If we are unable to pay our debt as it becomes due
and are unable to obtain financing on terms acceptable to us, or at all, we will
not be able to accomplish any or all of our initiatives and will be forced to
consider steps that would protect our assets against our creditors.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

We have not entered into any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are
reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition,
changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations,
liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources, and that would be
considered material to investors.

                                       23

<PAGE>

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLSOURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Not Applicable

ITEM 4T. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, we evaluated
the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act")) as of the end of the period covered
by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our chief executive officer and
chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures
are not effective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by us
in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is (a) recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
SEC's rules and forms and (b) accumulated and communicated to our management,
including our chief executive officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding disclosure.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting (as
defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended) during the quarter ended September 30, 2009 that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal
control over financial reporting.

ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURE CONCERNING CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

We currently believe that the Company has material weaknesses in its disclosure
controls and procedures. We will continue to work in the coming weeks and months
to address such weaknesses. We believe that the out-of-pocket costs, the
diversion of management's attention from running the day-to-day operations and
operational changes caused by the need to make changes in our internal control
and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act")) could be significant and still we may
not achieve significant improvements in our internal controls and procedures. If
the time and costs associated with such compliance exceed our current
expectations, our results of operations and the accuracy and timeliness of the
filing of our annual and periodic reports may be materially adversely affected
and could cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial
information, which could have a negative affect on the trading price of our
common stock.

                                       24

<PAGE>

                                     PART II
                                OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On or about April 16, 2004, Plaintiffs A. Sean Rose, Claire F. Rose, and Mark
Rose commenced an action in the Los Angeles Superior Court against the Company
(A. SEAN ROSE, CLAIRE F. ROSE AND MARK ROSE V. UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY,
FKA POLLUTION RESEARCH AND CONTROL CORPORATION) for amounts allegedly due
pursuant to four unpaid promissory notes. On August 2, 2004, the parties
executed a Confidential Settlement Agreement and Mutual Releases (the
"Agreement"). On December 30, 2005, Plaintiffs commenced an action against the
Company, alleging the Company breached the Agreement and sought approximately
$205,000 in damages. A judgment was entered on April 11, 2006 for $209,277.58.
The Company has previously accrued for this settlement. As of September 30,
2009, we have accrued $495,118 for this settlement including principal and
interest.

On June 2, 2006, Plaintiff Trilogy Capital Partners instituted an action in the
Los Angeles Superior Court (TRILOGY CAPITAL PARTNERS V. UNIVERSAL DETECTION
TECHNOLOGY, ET. AL., Case No. SC089929) against the Company. Plaintiff's
Complaint alleged damages against Universal Detection Technology ("UDT")for
breach of an engagement letter in the amount of $93,448.54. Also, Plaintiff
alleged that UDT had failed to issue warrants to it pursuant to a written
agreement. After completing the initial stages of litigation and conducting
extensive mediation, Plaintiff and UDT reached a settlement wherein commencing
December 15, 2006, UDT would make monthly payments to Plaintiff of $2,000 until
a debt of $90,000 plus accrued interest at six percent per annum was fully paid.
In exchange, Plaintiff would release all of its claims against UDT. UDT has been
current on all of its agreed payments to Plaintiff. As of September 30, 2009,
$48,357 was due under the agreement.

On November 15, 2006, Plaintiff NBGI, Inc. instituted an action in the Los
Angeles Superior Court (NBGI, Inc. v. Universal Detection Technology, et. al.,
Case No. BC361979) against Universal Detection Technology ("UDT"). NBGI, Inc.'s
Complaint alleged breach of contract, and requested damages in the amount of
$111,014.34 plus interest at the legal rate and for costs of suit. There is also
a Motion for Summary Judgment set for September 11, 2007. The Summary Judgment
was granted in NBGI's favor and Judgment has been entered.

On June 23, 2009, California Institute of Technology ("Cal Tech") sent a letter
to Universal Detection Technology ("UDT"), asserting certain breaches by UDT of
that certain License Agreement between Cal Tech and UDT effective September 30,
2009 as amended (the "License Agreement") including nonpayment of royalties,
failure to pay certain prosecution and legal costs and failure to fully
commercialize the patents and technologies that are licensed to UDT under the
License Agreement. Cal Tech is also asserting its right to terminate the License
Agreement effective June 4, 2009. UDT disagrees with the various assertions made
by Cal Tech in the letter and has requested that Cal Tech submit to arbitration
all matters in dispute. To date, no further action has been taken and UDT
continues to perform under the License Agreement. However, there can be no
assurance that the License Agreement will continue in effect, or that UDT will
be able to continue the use, development and commercialization of the underlying
patents and technologies. Primarily the License Agreement concerns a group of
patents that support UDT's "BSM" technologies and related products. The loss of
these licensed technologies would have an adverse effect on UDT's prospects
until such time as alternate technologies are licensed or developed.

ITEM 1A.  RISK FACTORS

Not Applicable.

                                       25

<PAGE>

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

During the third quarter of 2009, we issued the following securities which were
not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. We did not employ
any form of general solicitation or advertising in connection with the offer and
sale of the securities described below. In addition, we believe the purchasers
of the securities are "ACCREDITED INVESTORS" for the purpose of Rule 501 of the
Securities Act. For these reasons, among others, the offer and sale of the
following securities were made in reliance on the exemption from registration
provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act or Regulation D promulgated by
the SEC under the Securities Act:



     o    During the three months ended September 30, 2009, we issued
          307,457,792 shares of common stock to various notes holders upon the
          conversion of outstanding debt obligations valued at approximately
          $526,978.

     o    During October 2009, we issued 83,153,380 shares of common stock to
          various note holders upon conversion of outstanding debt obligations
          valued at approximately $599,596.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

We have defaulted upon the following senior securities

     o    One loan from three family members, each of whom is an unaffiliated
          party, evidenced by four promissory notes in the aggregate principal
          amounts of $100,000, $50,000, $50,000, and $100,000, each due June 24,
          2001 with interest rates ranging from 11% to 12%. We entered into a
          settlement agreement in the third quarter of 2004 with each of these
          parties. Pursuant to this agreement, at June 30, 2005, we were
          required to pay an additional $80,000 as full payment of our
          obligations. We did not make scheduled payments and are in default of
          these notes.

     o    One loan from an unaffiliated party in the aggregate principal amount
          of $195,000 with interest at a rate of 9% per annum. Pursuant to a
          letter agreement dated as of August 10, 2004, we entered into a
          settlement with this party and agreed to pay a total of $261,000
          pursuant to a scheduled payment plan through July 2005. Additionally,
          the Company, in September 2004, issued 206,250 shares of common stock
          upon the conversion of unpaid interest in the aggregate amount of
          $33,000. At September 30, 2009, there was $161,000 principal amount
          remaining on this note. We did not make our scheduled payment under
          this note and are in default. As of September 30, 2009, we owed
          $78,010 in interest on this note.

     o    One loan from an unaffiliated party in the aggregate principal amount
          of $98,500, due July 31, 2005 with interest at the rate of 9% per
          annum. Pursuant to a letter agreement dated August 10, 2004, between
          this third party and us, we agreed to pay a total of $130,800 pursuant
          to a scheduled payment plan through July 2005. At September 30, 2009,
          there was $71,500 principal amount remaining on this note. We did not
          make our scheduled payments under this note and are in default. As of
          September 30, 2009, we owed $34,709 in interest on this note.

                                       26

<PAGE>

ITEM 4.  SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

Not Applicable.

ITEM  5. OTHER INFORMATION.

During the three months ended September 30, 2009, we issued 307,457,792 shares
of common stock to various notes holders upon the conversion of outstanding debt
obligations valued at approximately $526,978.

During October 2009, we issued 83,153,380 shares of common stock to various note
holders upon conversion of outstanding debt obligations valued at approximately
$599,596.

ITEM 6.  EXHIBITS.

EXHIBIT LIST

Exhibit Number          Description

----------------------- --------------------------------------------------------
10.1                    Form of Note Conversion Agreement
----------------------- --------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 31              Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the
                        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith
----------------------- --------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32              Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
                        Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to
                        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
                        2002, filed herewith.
----------------------- --------------------------------------------------------


                                       27

<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.


Dated: November 13, 2009           UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY


                                   /s/ Jacques Tizabi
                                   ------------------
                                   Jacques Tizabi,
                                   President, Chief Executive Officer
                                   (Principal Executive Officer), and Acting
                                   Chief Financial Officer (Acting Principal
                                   Financial Officer)


                                       28