alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2014164EN.01004301.xml

| 3.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 164/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 164/43

---

POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION EUCAP SAHEL MALI/1/2014

of 26 May 2014

on the appointment of the Head of Mission of the European Union CSDP mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali)

(2014/310/CFSP)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 38 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2014/219/CFSP of 15 April 2014 on the European Union CSDP mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali) (1), and in particular Article 7(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Decision 2014/219/CFSP, the Political and Security Committee is authorised, in accordance with Article 38 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purpose of political control and strategic direction of the EUCAP Sahel Mali mission, including the decision to appoint a Head of Mission. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Decision 2014/219/CFSP, the Political and Security Committee is authorised, in accordance with Article 38 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purpose of political control and strategic direction of the EUCAP Sahel Mali mission, including the decision to appoint a Head of Mission.

| (2) | The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy has proposed the appointment of Mr Albrecht CONZE as Head of Mission of EUCAP Sahel Mali from 26 May 2014 to 14 January 2015, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy has proposed the appointment of Mr Albrecht CONZE as Head of Mission of EUCAP Sahel Mali from 26 May 2014 to 14 January 2015,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Albrecht CONZE is hereby appointed Head of the European Union CSDP mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali) from 26 May 2014 to 14 January 2015.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 26 May 2014.

For the Political and Security Committee

The Chairperson

W. STEVENS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 113, 16.4.2014, p. 21.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         209,860
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,911
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      43,357,795
<DEPRECIATION>                              18,662,246
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,580,729
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,255,658
<BONDS>                                     32,446,089
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (18,754,133)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,580,729
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,844,086
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  898,182
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,850,856
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,652,234)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,652,234)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,652,234)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (79.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
647.000 Scope of part.       The FAR and DOSAR do not apply to the acquisition of transportation services via Government bill of lading (GBL) or other similar forms.    **Parent topic:** PART 647—TRANSPORTATION
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 22

- 00366

- CV

IN RE Gabriel ESTRADA

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa , Justice

Irene Rios , Justice

Beth Watkins , Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 10, 2022

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On June 21, 2022

, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Mandamus is an

extraordinary remedy, available only when the relator can show (1) the trial court clearly abused

its discretion or violated a duty imposed by law; and (2) there is no adequate remedy by way of

appeal. See Walker v. Packer

, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839

- 40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). As the

Texas Supreme Court recently recognized, mandamus is not meant for grievances that may be

addressed by other remedies. See Elec. Reliability Council of Tex., Inc. v. Panda Power Generation

Infrastructure Fund, LLC

, 619 S.W.3d 628, 641 (Tex. 2021). This court has reviewed orders

granting pleas to the jurisdiction under Texas Family Code section 102.003(a)(9) on direct appeal.

See, e.g., In re Guardianship of C.E.M.

- K

., 341 S.W.3d 68, 78 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2011,

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2007

- CI

- 07900 , styled In the Interest of J.N.M., a Child , pending in the

288th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Cynthia Marie Chapa presiding.04

- 22

- 00366

- CV

- 2

- pet.) (concluding former step

- father had standing to file SAPCR); see also Y.B

., 300 S.W.3d 1, 3

(Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2009, pet. denied). However, because relator has not shown he has no

adequate remedy by direct appeal, we conclude rel ator is not entitled to the relief sought

.

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. 2 See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

2 On Ju ne 24 , 2022, this court issued an order denying relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
Exhibit 35.1a



|     |  |                                     
|---- |  | ------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | 1 Corelogic Drive
Westlake, TX 76262

SERVICER COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION

This Servicer Compliance Certification is issued pursuant to the Tax Outsourcing Agreement dated as of May 28, 2009 (together with all amendments thereto, the
Agreement), between Cenlar FSB (Bank) and CoreLogic Tax Services, LLC (CoreLogic).

I, Vicki Chenault, an authorized
officer of CoreLogic, certify to Bank and with the knowledge and intent that it will rely upon this certification, that:

1. The servicing
information required to be provided to Bank by CoreLogic under the Agreement has been so provided;

2. I am responsible for reviewing the
activities performed by CoreLogic under the Agreement and, based upon my knowledge and in all material respects throughout the relevant reporting period, CoreLogic has fulfilled its obligations under the Agreement.

3. Attached to this Servicer Compliance Certification is a list of all material failures and the nature and status thereof. [NONE/NO
ATTACHMENT]



|                            |  |                      
|--------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|CORELOGIC TAX SERVICES, LLC
|                            | 
|By:                         |  | /s/ Vicki Chenault   
|                            |  | Vicki Chenault       
|                            |  | Senior Vice President
|                            |  | February 11, 2016
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Terence Sein, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Alpha Spacecom, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. I am responsible for  establishing  and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures  (as defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and  15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



a) Designed such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure controls and  procedures  to be designed  under my  supervision,  to ensure that material  information  relating  to the small  business  issuer,  including  its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Omitted;



c)  Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  small  business  issuer's  disclosure controls and procedures  and presented in this report my  conclusions  about the effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business  issuer's  internal control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the small  business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has  materially  affected,  or is reasonably  likely to materially  affect,  the small business  issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial  reporting,  to the small  business  issuer's  auditors  and the audit committee  of the  small  business  issuer's  board  of  directors  (or  persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably likely to  adversely  affect  the small  business  issuer's  ability  to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other employees who have a significant  role in the small business  issuer's  internal control over financial reporting.

August 19, 2004

/s/ Terence Sein

Name:  Terence Sein

Title:  Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

April 16, 2007

NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY

 REGARDING CORPORATE/

CONFLICT STATEMENT

To: Counsel of record for

 Total Containment, Inc.

 Dayco Products, Inc.

 Mark IV Industries, Ltd.

 Ticona Polymers, Inc.

 Cleveland Tubing, Inc.

 Underwriters Laboratories, Inc.

From: Clerk’s Office

Case Style: May’s Distributing Company, Inc. v. Total Containment, Inc., et al. 

Case Number: 2:06-cv-00702-MEF

Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 7.1, and this

Court’s General Order Miscellaneous Case No. 00-3047 parties are required to file their

Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement at their initial appearance.

No corporate/conflict disclosure statement has been filed by you in this action.

This deficiency must be corrected within ten (10) days from this date. Please refer to

attachment.

Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 75 Filed 04/16/2007 Page 1 of 1


**SAMPLE NOTICE FORMAT**

Note: When E-Filing this pleading, please enter a separate docket entry. The event entry is located on

CM/ECF by clicking: CIVIL > OTHER DOCUMENTS > CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

________________________ DIVISION

_________________________________, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. __________________

)

_________________________________, )

)

Defendants, )

CORPORATE/CONFLICT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

In accordance with the order of this Court, the undersigned party or parties to the

above-captioned matter do hereby make the following disclosure concerning parent

companies, subsidiaries, affiliates, partnership, joint ventures, debtor, creditors’ committee,

or other entities reportable under the provisions of the Middle District of Alabama’s General

Order No. 3047:

There are no entities to be reported.

- or -

The following entities are hereby reported:

____________________________________________________

____________________________________________________

____________________________________________________

 Signature 

 Date Counsel

 

Counsel for (print names of all parties)

 

Address, City, State Zip Code

 

Telephone Number

***Certificate of Service Required

Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 75-2 Filed 04/16/2007 Page 3 of 3
# SUBCHAPTER G—CONTRACT MANAGEMENT   

- PART 742—CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION 
- PART 744—SUBCONTRACTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES 
- PART 745—GOVERNMENT PROPERTY 
- PART 747—TRANSPORTATION 
- PART 749—TERMINATION OF CONTRACTS 
- PART 750—EXTRAORDINARY CONTRACTUAL ACTIONS 

- PART 742—CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION      - Subpart 742.7—Indirect Cost Rates     - 742.770   Negotiated indirect cost rate agreement.
  - Subpart 742.11—Production, Surveillance, and Reporting     - 742.1170   Performance monitoring and progress reporting.
    - 742.1170-1   General.
    - 742.1170-2   Applicability.
    - 742.1170-3   Policy.
    - 742.1170-4   Progress reporting requirements and contract clause.
  - Subpart 742.15—Contractor Performance Information     - 742.1501   [Reserved]
    - 742.1502   Policy.
    - 742.1503   Procedures.
- PART 744—SUBCONTRACTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES    - Subpart 744.2—Consent to Subcontracts     - 744.202-170   Partner vetting.
- PART 745—GOVERNMENT PROPERTY    - Subpart 745.1—General     - 745.107   Contract clauses.
- PART 747—TRANSPORTATION    - Subpart 747.5—Ocean Transportation by U.S.-Flag Vessels     - 747.507   Contract clauses.
- PART 749—TERMINATION OF CONTRACTS    - Subpart 749.1—General Principles     - 749.100   Scope of subpart.
    - 749.111   Review of proposed settlements.
    - 749.111-70   Termination settlement review boards.
    - 749.111-71   Required review and approval.
- PART 750—EXTRAORDINARY CONTRACTUAL ACTIONS      - 750.000   Scope of part.
  - Subpart 750.70 [Reserved]
  - Subpart 750.71—Extraordinary Contractual Actions To Protect Foreign Policy Interests of the United States     - 750.7100   Scope of subpart.
    - 750.7101   Authority.
    - 750.7102   General policy.
    - 750.7103   Definitions.
    - 750.7104   Types of actions.
    - 750.7105   Approving authorities.
    - 750.7106   Standards for deciding cases.
    - 750.7106-1   General.
    - 750.7106-2   Amendments without consideration.
    - 750.7106-3   Mistakes.
    - 750.7106-4   Informal commitments.
    - 750.7107   Limitations upon exercise of authority.
    - 750.7108   Contractual requirements.
    - 750.7109   Submission of requests by contractors.
    - 750.7109-1   Filing requests.
    - 750.7109-2   Form of requests by contractors.
    - 750.7109-3   Facts and evidence.
    - 750.7110   Processing cases.
    - 750.7110-1   Investigation.
    - 750.7110-2   Office of General Counsel coordination.
    - 750.7110-3   Submission of cases to the M/OAA Director.
    - 750.7110-4   Processing by M/OAA Director.
    - 750.7110-5   Contract files.
    - 750.7110-6   Inter-agency coordination.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Arrieus Palmer, Appellant.

[815 NYS2d 129]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Brown, J.), entered March 25, 2004, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review the issue of whether his plea allocution was factually deficient *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Jones,*21 AD3d 968, 969 [2005]). Furthermore, despite the defendant’s claims, his plea allocution did not cast significant doubt upon his guilt or negate any of the essential elements of robbery in the second degree *(see People v Lopez,*71 NY2d 662, 666 [1988]; *People v Ward,*282 AD2d 871, 872 [2001]).

The court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s pro se motion to withdraw his plea of guilty *(see*CPL 220.60 [3]; *People v Colon,*114 AD2d 967 [1985]). “The defendant’s allegations in support of that motion were either unsubstantiated or belied by his statements during the plea proceedings” *(People v Tissiera,*22 AD3d 611, 612 [2005]; *see People v Colon, supra).*The defendant was not denied the effective assistance of counsel in connection with this motion, and there was no conflict of interest requiring the court to appoint new counsel *(see People v Lattimore,*5 AD3d 399, 400 [2004]; *People v Haynes,*248 AD2d 402 [1998]; *People v Ocana,*135 AD2d 743 [1987]).

The defendant waived his claim that he was denied the opportunity to testify at the grand jury proceedings *(see*CPL 190.50 [5] [c]).

The defendant’s claim that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel in connection with the grand jury proceedings cannot be reviewed on direct appeal because they are based upon matters dehors the record *(see People v Wingate,*297 AD2d 761, 762 [2002]). Miller, J.P., Santucci, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

LAKITA JORDAN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-712-MEF

)

HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., )

)

Defendant. )

RULE 26(f) ORDER

The parties are hereby reminded of the obligation, imposed by Rule 26(f) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to confer and to develop a proposed discovery plan. The

Rule 26(f) report containing the discovery plan shall be filed as soon as practicable but not

later than September 29, 2006.

The longstanding practice in this district is that dispositive motions shall be filed no

later than 90 days prior to the pretrial date. If the parties seek to vary from that schedule,

they should present, in the plan, specific case related reasons for the requested variance.

This case will be set for trial before the undersigned judge during one of that judge's

regularly scheduled civil trial terms. The pretrial date is normally set within four to six

weeks of a scheduled trial term. The dates of each judge's civil trial terms are available on

the court's website located at http://almd.uscourts.gov in the civil case information section.

This court may or may not hold a scheduling conference before issuing a scheduling

order. If the court holds a scheduling conference, counsel may participate in the scheduling

Case 2:06-cv-00712-MEF-CSC Document 7 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

conference by conference call.

The scheduling order entered by the court will follow the form of the Uniform

Scheduling Order adopted by the judges of this court. The Uniform Scheduling Order is also

available on the court's website.

The report of the parties should comply with Form 35 of the Appendix of Forms to

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

DONE this the 11th day of September, 2006.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00712-MEF-CSC Document 7 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 2 of 2
Subpart 1033.2 - Disputes and Appeals

Parent topic: PART 1033 - PROTESTS, DISPUTES, AND APPEALS

1033.201 Definitions.

Agency Board of Contract Appeals means the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals (CBCA). The CBCA

is the authorized representative of the Secretary of the Treasury in hearing, considering, and

determining all appeals of decisions of Contracting Officers filed by contractors pursuant to FAR

Subpart 33.2. Appeals are governed by the Rules of Procedure of the CBCA.
State Agencies | Online Services

Division of Air Pollution Control Phone: (614) 644-2270 ~ Fax: (614) 644-3681 ~ Contact Us ~ Contact E-Chec k Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1049, Columbus, OH 43216-1049 Street Address: 50 West Town Street, Suite 700, Columbus, OH 43215 Report a Spill, Release or Environmental Crim e (800) 282-9378or (614) 224-0946 

# Oil and Gas Well-site Production Operations with a Small Flare (GP 12.1 )

T hese links are used for determining qualification for and/or applyi ng for a model general permit (GP) for oil and gas well-site production operations where the flare is limited to a nominal 10 mmBtu/hr and the natural gas engines are limited to 1,800 total horsepower. This model GP has been deve loped to include all operations involved in an oil and gas well-site during the production phase of the well, including glycol dehydration units, natural gas a nd diesel engines, fixed roof storage tanks, flares and ancillary equipment

. Permits are available in Microsoft Word [DOC] and Adobe Reader [PDF] formats.

Model General Permit *Terms and Conditions Non-Title V (General PTIO) [DOC] [PDF] Qualifying Criteria [DOC] [PDF] *Effective April 4, 2014

Applying for a general permit General Permit Application Instructions [DOC] [PDF] PTI/PTIO Application [DOC] Section 1 [DOC] Section 2 PTI/PTIO Application Instructions [DOC] Instructions EAC Form and Instructions 3100 “Process Operation” [DOC] Form [DOC] Instructions [PDF] (Form and Instructions) EAC Form and Instructions 3104 “Storage Tank” [DOC] Form [DOC] Instructions [PDF] (Form and Instructions) EAC Form and Instructions 3862 “Stationary Internal Combustion Engines” [DOC] Form [DOC] Instructions [PDF] (Form and Instructions)

Select another model general permit

John R. Kasich, Gov. | Craig W. Butler, Director | Pr ivacy Statement | Site Index | Contact | Employee Login 

### Search..

.

Home About Divisions and Offices Do Business Citizens and Educators News How Do I? Contact 

# http://epa.ohio.gov/dapc/genpermit/Oil_Gas_GP121.aspx
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3177 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain compounds of lanthanum 

phosphates. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. BUNNING introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain compounds of 

lanthanum phosphates. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN COMPOUNDS OF LANTHANUM 

4 PHOSPHATES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.10.02 Compounds, inorganic or organic, of 

rare-earth metals, of lanthanum 

phosphates (provided for in subheadings 

2846.10.00 and 2846.90.80) ................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•S 3177 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS