alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

ANTHONY BERNARD MOORER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06CV672-WKW

) [WO]

CITY OF MONTGOMERY, )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER ON MOTION

For good cause, it is

ORDERED that the Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed on 27 July

2006 (Doc. # 2), is GRANTED.

DONE this 9 day of August, 2006. th

/s/ Vanzetta Penn McPherson

VANZETTA PENN MCPHERSON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00672-WKW-WC Document 5 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

ROBERT E. COLE Attorney For Plaintiff

ROBERT E. COLE, P.C.

ATTORNEY I.D. NO. 73263

437 CHESTNUT STREET, SUITE 218

PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106

(215) 922-2050

___________________________________

OWEN J. ROGAL, D.D.S., P.C. :

d/b/a THE PAIN CENTER

501-07 SOUTH 12TH STREET

PHILADELPHIA, PA 19147

Plaintiff :

V. : NO. 3:06cv728-MHT

SKILSTAF, INC. :

P.O. BOX 729

ALEXANDER CITY, AL 35011

Defendant :

___________________________________

PLAINTIFF OWEN J. ROGAL, D.D.S., P.C.’S INDEX TO EXHIBITS IN

OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT SKILSTAF, INC.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

EXHIBIT A PEER REVIEW LITERATURE ON

RADIOFREQUENCY SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

EXHIBIT B OPERATIVE REPORTS

B1 1/20/05 – 2/11/05

B2 2/18/05 – 3/4/05

B3 3/18/05 – 4/1/05

B4 4/15/05 – 5/6/05

B5 5/13/05 – 5/25/05

B6 5/26/05 – 6/1/05

B7 6/3/05 – 6/7/05

EXHIBIT C REVIEW DENIAL OF BENEFITS

CORRESPONDENCES (W/ ENCLOSURES)

Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 48 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 1 of 2
AFFIDAVIT OF KIM ROGAL-DEOLIVEIRA

s/Robert E. Cole______________________

Robert E. Cole, Esquire

Attorney for Plaintiff

Atty. I.D. No. 73263

437 Chestnut Street, Suite 218

Philadelphia, PA 19106

(215) 922-2050

recoleesq6@juno.com

Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 48 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 2 of 2
§ 110.27 General license for imports. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, a general license is issued to any person to import byproduct, source, or special nuclear material if the U.S. consignee is authorized to receive and possess the material under the relevant NRC or Agreement State regulations.
( b ) The general license in paragraph (a) of this section does not authorize the import of more than 100 kilograms per shipment of source and/or special nuclear material in the form of irradiated fuel.
( c ) Paragraph (a) of this section does not authorize the import under a general license of radioactive waste.
( d ) A person importing formula quantities of strategic special nuclear material (as defined in § 73.2 of this chapter) under this general license shall provide the notifications required by § 73.27 and § 73.72 of this chapter.
( e ) A general license is issued to any person to import the major components of a utilization facility as defined in § 110.2 for end-use at a utilization facility licensed by the Commission.
( f ) Importers of radioactive material listed in appendix P to this part must provide the notifications required by § 110.50.
[51 FR 47208, Dec. 31, 1986, as amended at 56 FR 38336, Aug. 13, 1991; 58 FR 13003, Mar. 9, 1993; 60 FR 37564, July 21, 1995; 61 FR 35602, July 8, 1996; 65 FR 70291, Nov. 22, 2000; 68 FR 31589, May 28, 2003; 70 FR 37991, July 1, 2005; 75 FR 44089, July 28, 2010; 77 FR 27114, May 9, 2012]
EXHIBIT 11


                               EGAN SYSTEMS, INC.
                          COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER SHARE


Computation of net loss per share:

The following data show the amounts used in computing net loss per share and the
effect  on net loss and the  weighted  average  number  of  shares  of  dilutive
potential common stock.

                                                       Nine Months Ended
                                                         September 30,
                                                  ----------------------------
                                                      2001            2000
                                                  ------------    ------------

Net loss available to common stockholders         $   (243,489)   $   (429,945)
                                                  ============    ============

Weighted average number of common shares in
 primary EPS                                        19,646,652      19,368,874

Effect of dilutive securities                             --              --
                                                  ------------    ------------

Weighted average number of common shares and
 dilutive potential common stock used in
 fully diluted EPS                                  19,646,652      19,368,874
                                                  ============    ============

Net loss per common share:
 Basic and fully diluted                          $     (0.012)   $     (0.022)
                                                  ============    ============

For 2001 and 2000,  the  effect of  dilutive  securities  were not  included  in
computing fully diluted EPS because their effects are anti-dilutive.
#### Stefan Juszczak, an Infant by Adam Juszczak, His Guardian ad Litem, et al., Respondents, v. City of New York, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

In an action to recover damages for personal injury, medical expenses, etc,, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered January 23, 1967 in favor of plaintiffs against appellant, upon a jury verdict. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, and new trial granted as against defendant City of New York. In our opinion, the finding of negligence implicit in the jury’s verdict is against the weight of the credible evidence *(Frost*v. *New York City Tr. Auth.,*29 A D 2d 978; cf. *Scanlon*v. *Temple,*297 N. Y. 516; *Meadows*v. *Pless,*27 A D 2d 747; *Acevedo*v. *City of New York,*15 A D 2d 899, affd. 17 N Y 2d 843; *Wallach*v. *Gray’s Sons,*244 App. Div. 873; *Brianzi*v. *Crane Co.,*196 App. Div. 58). *Day*v. *Johnson*
      *825(265 App. Div. 383) is not controlling. In that case, there was sufficient evidence to support a finding that the defendant was operating his vehicle “at a rate of speed far in excess” of the limit permitted by law (p. 386). *Herbst*v. *Balogh*(7 A D 2d 530) is distinguishable. In that case, the driver actually observed children crossing the street in front of her vehicle prior to the accident, but failed to sound her horn. If upon the retrial of this action it shall appear that sufficient facts have been shown to raise an issue of fact as to whether the infant plaintiff’s father acted reasonably in his care and supervision of the child immediately prior to the accident, the jury should be charged that. contributory negligence on the part of the father will bar a derivative recovery by him (see *Miller*v. *Rankin,*10 A D 2d 695; *Fitzpatrick*v. *State of New York, 195*Misc. 762; *Bailey*v. *Roat,*178 Misc. 870; Prosser, Torts [3d ed.], p. 916). Brennan, Acting P. J., Benjamin, Munder, Martuscellp and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 188 (Monday, September 29, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58401-58402]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-23109]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8887]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Madame C[eacute]zanne'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Madame C[eacute]zanne,'' imported from 
abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of 
cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Metropolitan 
Museum of Art, New York, NY, from on or about November 19, 2014, until 
on or about March 15, 2015, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have 
ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of

[[Page 58402]]

State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: September 23, 2014.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-23109 Filed 9-26-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
Subpart 5642.2 - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION SERVICES     **Parent topic:** Part 5642 - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT SERVICES5642.202 Assignment of Contract Administration.    *(Revised June 2021)*       (a) USSOCOM Directorate of Procurement policy is to transfer all contract administrative responsibility to the servicing DCMA on all contracts over $350,000 not purchased in accordance with FAR Part 12, except where required by statute or excluded from DCMA responsibility. Exception may be granted by:       (1) Contracting Officer determination to be in the best interest of the organization to retain ACO responsibilities at the local office.       (2) Determination that it is most effective to transfer only partial responsibility to the DCMA.       The decision should be based on providing the best service to the customer and the capabilities of the contracting office. Both determinations should be made in writing and maintained in the contract file.       (b) The transmittal of the contract shall be accomplished in a manner that will provide documentation of confirmation of receipt by the DCMA office.       (c) *(Removed 2017)*
ex10_9.htm


     

     

    
      
        	
                A)  

              	
                Employment
      Contract of Li Chak Ming

              


      

      


      Employer: Wide Broad Group
Limited    Employee: Li Chak Ming Representative:
Mr.Liu Ruisheng

      


      Position:
independent non-executive director

      


      Job Duty: According to the
experience, providing the independent and objective opinion for assisting the
board of directors. The employee should assurance enough time and spirit
handling the company affair in order to maintain effective operation and high
standard operation of the company.

      


      Effective Period: 2 years,
Effective date: July
1st,
2009

      


      Remuneration: HKD$180,000/year
will be paid in the last day for every quarter in four
installments.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Reginald Harris, Appellant.

[813 NYS2d 904]

*388Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy Kahn, J.), rendered June 24, 2004, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the second degree (two counts), robbery in the third degree and escape in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to consecutive terms of 15 years and 12 years for the burglary convictions, concurrent with concurrent terms of 3V2 to 7 years and 1 year, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s argument that the court should have instructed the jury not to commingle the evidence of the two incidents, and his challenge to the adequacy of the court’s adverse inference charge with respect to the loss of a lineup report are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that the charge made it sufficiently clear to the jury that the evidence as to each incident was to be considered separately (see *People v Gutierrez,*304 AD2d 458 [2003]), and that the language employed in the adverse inference charge was appropriate (see *People v Gibbs,*207 AD2d 288 [1994], *affd*85 NY2d 899 [1995]).

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Saxe, J.P., Marlow, Sullivan, Gonzalez and Malone, JJ.
THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

LONNIE CAMMON, #236498, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) 2:06-CV-674-WKW[WO]

)

DR. SEDIET, et al., )

)

 Defendants. )

FINAL JUDGMENT

In accordance with the prior proceedings, opinions, and orders of the court, it is the

ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that this action is DISMISSED without

prejudice.

The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as

a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

DONE this 23rd day of February, 2009.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00674-WKW-TFM Document 29 Filed 02/23/09 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

September 27, 2006

NOTICE OF CORRECTION

From: Clerk’s Office

Case Style: Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Prather 

Case Number: 3:06-cv-00733-MHT

This Notice of Correction was filed in the referenced case this date to correct the unreadable

PDF documents previously attached by E-Filer. 

The correct PDF documents are attached to this notice for your review. Reference is made

to docket entries #9 & #10 filed on September 26, 2006.

Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 13 Filed 09/27/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 13-2 Filed 09/27/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 13-2 Filed 09/27/2006 Page 2 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 13-3 Filed 09/27/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 13-3 Filed 09/27/2006 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
               RULE 13a-14(b)


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gallery of History, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Todd Axelrod, Chief Executive Office of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

1.	 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Todd Axelrod
----------------
Todd Axelrod
Chief Executive Officer

February 13, 2007
1513.000 Scope of part.

This part prescribes EPA policies and procedures for the acquisition of supplies, nonpersonal

services, and construction from commercial sources, the aggregate amount of which does not exceed

the simplified acquisition threshold.

Parent topic: PART 1513 - SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES
Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 8 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 8 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 2 of 2
§ 987.30 Duties. The Committee shall have, among other things, the following duties: ( a ) To act as intermediary between the Secretary and any producer or handler.
( b ) To keep minutes, books, and records which will clearly reflect all of its transactions and such minutes, books, and other records shall be subject to examination by the Secretary at any time.
( c ) To investigate the growing, handling, and marketing conditions with respect to dates, to assemble data in connection therewith.
( d ) To furnish to the Secretary such available information as may be deemed pertinent to the administration of this subpart or as he may request and to give to the Secretary the same notice of meetings of the Committee as is given to the members of the Committee.
( e ) To appoint such employees as it may deem necessary and to determine the salaries, define the duties and where desirable fix the bonds of such employees.
( f ) To cause the books of the Committee to be audited by a certified public accountant at least once each crop year and at such other times as the Committee may deem necessary or the Secretary may request. The report of each such audit shall show among other things the receipt and expenditure of funds pursuant hereto. Two copies of such audit shall be submitted to the Secretary.
( g ) To investigate compliance and to use means available to the Committee to prevent violations of this part.
( h ) To furnish the Committee viewpoints of the consumer, the Committee may utilize a consumer consultant. The consumer consultant shall have no financial interest in the date industry and shall receive no compensation, however, such person shall be reimbursed for necessary expenses attendant to those assignments that the Committee has given prior support and approval.
[27 FR 6818, July 19, 1962, as amended at 43 FR 4252, Feb. 1, 1978]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          13,519
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 4,080
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     72,786
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        231,805
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,844
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 334,320
<DEPOSITS>                                     280,680
<SHORT-TERM>                                    14,852
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,484
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           356
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,304
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 334,320
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 10,612
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,364
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   142
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                13,119
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,384
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,734
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            7,385
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      724
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  28
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,838
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,851
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,948
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,948
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .57
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,620
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 10,049
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,484
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      686
<RECOVERIES>                                       322
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,844
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,844
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
SUBCHAPTER E—GENERAL CONTRACTING

REQUIREMENTS

PART 3427—PATENTS, DATA, AND COPYRIGHTS

PART 3428—BONDS AND INSURANCE

PART 3430—COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ADMINISTRATION

PART 3431—CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES

PART 3432—CONTRACT FINANCING

PART 3433—PROTESTS, DISPUTES, AND APPEALS

PART 3427—PATENTS, DATA, AND COPYRIGHTS

Subpart 3427.4—Rights in Data and Copyrights

3427.409 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.

PART 3428—BONDS AND INSURANCE

Subpart 3428.3—Insurance

3428.311 Solicitation provision and contract clause on liability insurance under

cost-reimbursement contracts.

3428.311-2 Agency solicitation and contract clauses.

PART 3430—COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ADMINISTRATION

Subpart 3430.201—CAS Program Requirements

3430.201 Contract requirements.

3430.201-5 Waiver.

PART 3431—CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES

Subpart 3431.1—Applicability

3431.101 Objectives.

Subpart 3431.2—Contracts With Commercial Organizations

3431.205 Selected costs.

3431.205-71 Noncontractor travel.

PART 3432—CONTRACT FINANCING

3432.000 Scope of part.

3432.006 Reduction or suspension of contract payments upon finding of fraud.

3432.006-3 Responsibilities.

Subpart 3432.4—Advance Payments for Other Than Commercial Acquisitions

3432.402 General.

3432.407 Interest.

Subpart 3432.7—Contract Funding

3432.706 Contract clauses.

3432.706-2 Clauses for limitation of cost or funds.

PART 3433—PROTESTS, DISPUTES, AND APPEALS

Subpart 3433.1—Protests

3433.103 Protests to the agency.
#### McAfee *et al.,*executors, *v.*Flanders *et al.*

June 13, 1913.

Rehearing denied July 21, 1913.

Complaint. Before Judge Hawkins. Johnson superior court. May 3, 1912. (See 138 *Ga.*403, 75 S. E. 319.)

*Sines ■& Jordan*and *Kent & Moye,*for plaintiffs in error.

*William*Fmrcloth, contra.

Hill, J.

1. There are no errors in the special assignments, requiring a new trial.

2. The verdict is contrary to the evidence. The evidence tended to show that there were seven legatees entitled to the estate left by the testator. The jury found in favor of the.three plaintiffs the full amount of all cotton left by the testator, certain rents, and the purchase-money of certain lands collected by the executors. The three plaintiffs were entitled to recover only three sevenths of the estate left by the testator. The following portion of the verdict of the jury, under the facts of this case, was also contrary to the evidence and the law, to wit: “We the jury direct that 6 of the heirs at law be paid the sum of $200.00 each, as said will provides.”

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.16(a)
 
Summary of Unwritten Compensation Arrangements
Applicable to Non-Employee Directors of Overstock.com, Inc.




During 2018 the Company expects to pay its non-employee directors $75,000 annually, at the rate of $18,750 per quarter. The Company also expect to continue to grant restricted stock units to its directors, generally at the first Board meeting after a director first joins the Board, and typically annually thereafter. The Company also reimburses directors for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending Board and committee meetings. Haverford Valley, L.C., an affiliate of the Company, and certain affiliated entities which make travel arrangements for the Company's executives, also occasionally make travel arrangements for directors to attend Board meetings.
#### § 986.75 Reports of handler inventory.

Each handler shall submit to the Council in such form and on such dates as the Council may prescribe, reports showing their inventory of inshell and shelled pecans.
#### § 984.19 Manufacturer.

*Manufacturer* means any person who uses walnuts in the production of bakery goods, ice cream, candy, or other food products, except walnut oil.