NBSIR 75-77l(/?7

An Evaluation and Assessment

of Existing Data and Procedures

for the Measurement of Noise

from Buses

Applied Acoustics Section

Institute for Basic Standards

National Bureau of Standards

Washington, D. C. 20234

September 1975

Final Report

Prepared for Office of Noise Abatement and Control

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency

Washington, D. C. 20460

NBSIR 75-771

AN EVALUATION AND ASSESSMENT

OF EXISTING DATA AND PROCEDURES

FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF NOISE

FROM BUSES

Applied Acoustics Section

Institute for Basic Standards

National Bureau of Standards

Washington, D. C. 20234

September 1975

Final Report

Prepared for Office of Noise Abatement and Control

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency

Washington, D. C. 20460

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Rogers C.B. Morton, Secretary

James A. Baker, III, Urtder Secretary

Dr. Betsy Ancker-Johnson. Assistant Secretary for Science and Technology

NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS. Ernest Ambler. Acting Director

Tatle of Contents

Page

Executive Suiimiary ii

1. Introduction and Scope 1

2. Bus Description and Design 2

2.1. Definition 2

2.2. Industry Structure 2

2.3. Design Characteristics k

3. Effects of Noise and Parties Affected 5 k. Major Noise Sources $

5. Modes of Operation Y

6. Existing Measurement Procedures 7

6.1. Exterior Noise 7

6.2. Interior Noise 10

7. Data Base and Correlations 12

8. bverviev of Bus Noise Measurement Difficulties I3

8.1. Classification I3

8.2. Relation of Physical Measures to Effects/Normal Use .... 13

8.3. Quantity Measured ik

. 8.U. Acoustic Environment I5

8.5. Instr-jmentation I6

8.6. Alternative Test Procedures I7

9. Appendix A. A Discussion of Bus Subsource Noise I8

10. Appendix B. Existing Bus Noise Measurement Procedures 2U

11. Appendix C. Bus Noise Reduction: Domestic and Foreign 39

12. References 39

13. Bibliography k2

i
Executive Summary

EPA is charged -with taking strong, comprehensive action to protect public

health and welfare from increasing noise. Accordingly, the Agency initially

identified medium and heavy trucks and portable air compressors as major

noise sources and promulgated noise emission regulations covering these

products. Additional products have recently been identified as major noise

soiirces, including buses. For the purposes of this discussion- buses can be

defined as motor vehicles (other than taxicabs) designed for carrying more

than ten passengers which are used for the transportation of persons for

compensation, including intracity, intercity, school and specialty buses.

As was the case for medium and heavy trucks, bus noise can be

categorized as the noise produced by the power plant [including the engine,

exhaust, intake, cooling fan, etc.] and by the tire-road interaction. The

noise from the power plant increases as the engine speed (and power)

increases while the noise from tires increases as the vehicle speed

increases. Maximiom power-plant noise usually occurs when the engine is

delivering maximum power at its maximum operating speed. The percentage of

time a bios spends at maximum noise conditions is determined by the vehicles

power-to-weight ratio and operating conditions such as acceleration, speed,

load, grade and to some extent, the manner in which the bus is operated.

This report reviews existing bus noise meas\irement procedures with

regard to their usefulness in the regulation of bus noise as well as the

availability, extent and applicability of existing data. On the basis of

this review, the following probable or potential measurement difficulties

have been identified that could hinder the promilLgation and/or enforcement

of future EPA regulations to control the noise emission from buses.

m- M ALMOST NON-EXISTENT DATA BASE . Very limited data exist in the

public domain on the noise levels associated with bus operations.

This is due, in part, to the fact that in the United States, medium

and heavy duty trucks and buses are tested according to the same test

procedure which has associated with it a single recommended sound

level to be met by both trucks and buses . Since mediimi trucks and

buses tended to be quieter than heavy trucks under the operational

test conditions specified — low speed acceleration passby (high

engine speed, low vehicle speed) — the majority of the emphasis has

been placed on research and development programs aimed at reducing

heavy truck noise.

LACK OF TYPICAL USAGE DATA . In order to develop an appropriate

,

reliable and repeatable test procedure, it is necessary to consider

the range of possible bus operational modes. What is needed is

definition of the percentage of time which a bus typically spends at

idle, accelerating, decelerating, at low speed cruise, at high speed

cruise, at wide open throttle, etc. Such typical usage data do not

presently exist for buses.
:nZj 10 COI^SIDER a CUKBSIDE test , since nany of the people affected "by cus ncise are out-cf-docrs and in close proxiiiity to the "buses, the noise

levels to vhich they are exposed can "be much higher than those typically

meas'ored "by existing U. S. standard procedures vhich utilize a measurement location 50 feet (15-2 m) from the centerline of the bus.

There exists a need to develop a cur"bside test to assess impact of noise

on pedestrians and for correlation of such data with conventional [50

foot (15-2 m) ] data to determine if both tests are needed.

m -~y^' TC DF/ELCP Air 117- VEHICLE TEST . There exists a need to develop an in-vehicle test to assess the impact of noise on passengers. (Bus

drivers are covered under the Bureau of Motor Carrier Safety Regulations

vhich establish a maximum interior sound level for buses operated in

interstate commerce. Presumably the remainder of the bus drivers vould

be covered by the OSHA regulations.)

liEED TO ACCCU:;T FOR EKyXROHIMTAL/SnE EFFECTS . There is a need for t"ne various envircr-mental and test site effects on noise generation,

radiation and/or propagation to be systematically investigated and

correction factors developed so t'nat meas-jjrements made -jr.der any

conditions may be corrected to a single standard set of conditions. If

correction factors are not feasible then there is a need for a site

calibration procei-^e or definition of limiting test conditions.

I"": 70?. SDTLE?. TEST PRGCEL'Jr.E . Tnere exists a need to develop a test

proced'jre that is simpler to perfcm and is less dependent on veather and

test site variables. Correlation should be established betveen the

results obtained utilizing such a test and h-oman response to bus noise.

a KEED TO SPECIFY z?j^',siii7z pzspciTSE Cr i:;st?.u:.z:;tatic:; more accu?^~eiy . There exists a need to measure the response of existing instr-jmentation

to actual transient signals, e.g., a bus passby, in order to establish

the interrelationships among the various precision instruments , to supply

data to strengthen existing standards, and to establish a data base so that the technical community, manufacturers, lavmakers and enforcement

agencies vill have a common basis for comparison of res-'olts obtained

using supposedly comparable eq_uipment.

In summary, it is doubtful that the data in the open literature are extensive enough to provide EPA vith the information needed for a comprehensive analysis of the economic costs and technical feasibility

associated vith a given regulation. Furthermore, there are practically no data available upon vhich to base an evaluation of alternative bus noise

measurement procedures or to establish correlations betveen the noise

associated vith various operational modes and the noise measured utilizing

various test procedures.

Thujs, it appears that EPA should generate an extensive physical data base

and investigate alternative meastirement procedures prior to formulation of t'ne Notice of Proposed Rule ''taking.

An Evaluation and Assessment of ExinLing Data and Procedures

for the Measurement of Noise From Buses

This report reviews existing "bus noise measurement procedures with

regard to their usef\iLness in the regulation of "bus noise as well as the

availability, extent and applicability of existing data. On the basis of

this review, probable or potential measurement difficulties are identified

that could hinder the promulgation and/or enforcement of future EPA

regulations to control the noise emission from buses.

Key Words: Acoustics (sound); bus; measurement methodology; noise

emission standard, noise measurement.

1. Introduction and Scope

The National Bureau of Standards (NBS), Tonder the sponsorship of the

Office of Noise Abatement and Control (ONAC), U. S. Environmental

Protection Agency, has attempted to identify probable or potential measurement difficulties that could hinder the promulgation and/or enforcement of

future noise reg\ilations to control the noise emissions from buses. A

search of the open literature in conjunction with numerous personal

contacts established the basis for discussion of:

1. The basic characteristics of bus design and construction.

2. The effect of bus noise and the parties affected.

3. The major component noise sources for buses.

k. The normal or typical mode of operation characteristic of the

various classes of buses.

5. The usefulness of existing measurement procedures for regulation

of the noise from buses considering the viewpoint of EPA, manufacturers and enforcement personnel.

6. The availability, extent and applicability of existing data that

coiald be utilized by EPA in their efforts to promulgate noise

emission regulations for buses.

This report is limited to those factors affecting the measurement of

bus noise. EPA/ONAC will independently investigate the technical

feasibility and economic implications of bus noise regulation. Also, it is

assumed that the strategy followed during the development of the new truck

regulation — namely, that tires will be identified separately as a major

noise source — will apply to all vehicular noise sources; therefore, this

report concentrates on measurement procedures for measuring the noise of

buses, excluding tires.
2. Bus Description and Design

2.1. Definition

The P'ederal Highway Administration, U. S. Department of

Transportation, Motor Carrier Safety Regulations [ 1 ]— defines a bus as "any

motor vehicle designed, constructed, and used for the transportation of

passengers; including taxicabs." A slightly modified definition, which

excludes taxicabs, was proposed by the Task Force on Noise to the State of

Illinois, Institute for Environmental Quality[2]. They defined a bus as a "motor vehicle designed for carrying more than 10 passengers; and every

motor vehicle, other than a taxicab, designed and used for the

transportation of persons for compensation." The latter definition will be

utilized throughout the remainder of this report.

It is also important to review the definition of "completed vehicle"

according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U. S.

Department of Transportation[3 ] . A completed vehicle is defined as "a

vehicle that requires no further manufacturing operations to perform its

intended fiinction, other than the addition of readily attachable

components, such as mirrors or tire and rim assemblies, or minor finishing

operations such as painting." Since most "bus" manufacturers do not

fabricate bus bodies, the majority of "buses" coming off the assembly line

do not meet the criterion to be called complete vehicles. Such vehicles

are termed "incomplete vehicles" and are defined as "an assemblage

consisting as a minimum, of frame and chassis structure, power train,

steering system, suspension system, and braking system, to the extent that

those systems are to be part of the completed vehicle, that requires

further manufacturing operations, other than the addition of readily

attachable components, such as mirrors or tire and rim assemblies, or minor

finishing operations such as painting to become a completed vehicle"[3].

For the purposes of this report, complete and incomplete buses will be

considered and will be referred to simply as buses.

2.2. Industry Structure

An extensive survey of current data on the bus population in the

United States and bus sales information for the current year was not made.

Data compiled in 19T^[^j5] indicates that the bus population is comprised

of approximately 79 percent school buses, 12 percent intracity buses, 5 percent intercity buses and h percent special purpose buses (see Table l).

Manufacturers of buses can be categorized into two distinct groups —

large companies that also produce trucks and/or automobiles and small

custom assemblers. The large companies utilize their research and

manufacturing expertise to adapt their engines and chassis to the needs of

the bus market. The large manufactiirers are particiilarly attracted to the

school bus market because of the large volume of sales and the fact that

this segment of the market readily lends itself to the "assembly line

concept" of manufacturing due, in part, to less restrictive passenger

— Numbers in brackets indicate the literature references at the end of this

report

.

2
Table 1. -otal r.-ssibeT of 'buses in the Unixed

States as of 19T3[U].

Z^-'x e

333,692 79

Ir.-ra city- 50,000 12

Intercity 20,600 5

Special Purpose 18,872 k

Total ^23,361i 100

Table 2. Man-ufact^-^rers of intracity, intercity and school buses[5]-

M£in"-;f acfurers of Total bales ±9 1

\ Maricet bhare (197^-^

j-noraci oy ^ -ls e

s

i - C- Cc .

General Mctors 1500 56

Flexicle Terr any* Ld.00 44

AM General

2700 100

~ >- — ^ 3"J. ~ s S

Moxcr Tcacji Ir.l'-LS tries^ :io B\}s anc ^ar ^crxan;** 300 27

General Motors 250 23

Others 150 11+ IIQO 100

Manufacf^ers of

i —

Schc:l luses

1 Internaticnal Harvester** 13,55: ^5

For z** 5,150 27

Chevrolet** 3,750 12

GMC** 3,150 10

Dodge** 1,1+00 5

Gillig Brothers* 200 0.5

Crown Coach* 0.^

100

** Zaze^z^r 1 - la'-'ire ?-"c: * ^Catescr-.- 11 - Snail Pre iuc ers

)

3
preference. On the other hand, the small companies design particular

configurations to meet the specialized demand of specific customers.

Ninety-nine percent of the school "buses in the United States are manufactured by International Harvester Company, Ford Motor Company, General

Motors Corporation — Truck and Coach and Chevrolet Divisions, and Chrysler

Corporation — Dodge Division. These companies do not manufacture bus

bodies but supply only the chassis and gasoline powerplant for school

buses. Two small manufacturers — Gillig Brothers and Crown Coach —

fabricate both the chassis and the bus body and also provide the option of

either a gasoline or diesel powerplant.

During 1972, 100 percent of the intracity (urban transit) buses manu- factured in the United States were produced by either General Motors Corporation or the Flexible Company. Since then, AM General, a subsidiary of

American Motors, has entered the market.

Motor Coach Industries , Bus and Car Company and General Motors manufactured 86 percent of the intercity highway buses (see Table 2) produced

in the United States in 1972. The remaining ik percent were manufactiired

by AM General, Flexible Company and Crown Coach. There is also a group of

manufacturers who produce only school bus bodies. These include Blue Bird

Body Company, Carpenter Body Works, Inc., Superior Coach Division of

Sheller-Globe Corporation, Perley A. Thomas Car Works, Inc., Ward School

Bus Manufacturing, Inc., and Wayne Corporation, to name just a few[5>6].

2.3. Design Characteristics

One convenient categorization for buses is with respect to their

intended use — (l) intracity transit buses, (2) intercity highway buses,

(3) school buses and (U) specialty buses utilized for airport service,

touring, etc. Each type of bus has its own market and specialized engineering characteristics. For example, nearly all school buses are gasoline

powered, while most intracity, intercity and special purpose buses are diesel powered. For the purpose of this report, trolleys and streetcars

are excluded.

Intracity buses (which operate in urban and subiirban areas) are typically 2-axle buses powered by either a Detroit Diese]. 6V-71 engine or a Detroit Diesel 8V-71 engine. These are 2-cycle diesel engines with

mechanically driven blowers to provide forced air induction. The radiator,

engine and transmission comprise a powerplant unit which is usually moimted

transversely across the extreme rear of the bus. The radiator is mounted

on the left-side (street side) in the rear while the automatic transmission

is located on the right side (ciorb side) of the engine compartment.

Usually an axial flow fan is mounted on the front of the engine, just

inboard of the radiator. The exhaust exit (specified by the customer) is

either at street level or high level.

Intercity buses (which primarily operate on highways) are 2- and

3-3.xle coaches that usually utilize a Detroit Diesel 8V-71 engine moiinted
longitudinally in the rear of the "bus with the front of the engine facing

the rear of the coach. They differ fron intracity huses in the fact that

they contain cargo or luggage compartments in the under carriage of the

"bus. A single radiator on the left side (street side) in the rear vith an axial flov fan or tvo radiators (one on each side of the bus) and tvo

"sGiiirrel cage" blovers are generally used to provide cooling. Single and

dual muffler systems and "both automatic and manual transmissions are available

.

School buses are nearly identical, except for the body, to medium duty

trucks. They utilize medium duty truck chassis and gasoline engines

mounted in the front of the bus — although rear and middle engine con- figurations are produced by some manufacturers. As is the case for trucks,

school buses utilize a forward mounted radiator and a single speed axial

flov engine cooling fan. The engine is muffled at the intake by an air

cleaner and at the exhaust port by a single, horizontal muffler and a long

tail pipe.

Because most studies in the past grouped special purpose buses with

intercity buses, little data exist on the vide range of special purpose

buses vhich are utilized for sightseeing, tours, airport transportation,

etc. The increased use of "minibuses" requires that special purpose buses

be broken out as a separate category in future investigations.

3. Effects of IToise and Parties Affected

In general, the noise from buses tends to annoy fever people than any

other vehicular noise source; hovever, the intensity of their noise

emissions tends to be greater[T]- The persons vho potentially are adversely affected by the noise from buses include the operator and

passengers on the bus, passengers vaiting at bus stops, other pedestrians,

other motorists, and persons living or vorking along the bus route. The

noise from buses can interfere vith speech communication; lead to

distraction or other kinds of task interference; disrupt sleep, rest and

recreation; and, in the case of bus drivers and long distance commuters,

potentially contribute to the risk of hearing damage and to other possible

physiological effects. Another factor vhich must be considered is that

since most of the people affected may not receive any benefit from the bus

service, their tolerance for bus noise is likely to be lover than that of a regular bus user.

Since many of the people affected by bus noise are out-of-doors and in

close proximity to the buses, the noise levels to vhich they are exposed

can be much higher than those typically measured by existing U. S. standard

procedures vhich utilize a measurement location 50 feet (15 '2 m) from the

cenxerline of the bus. In addition, the "canyon effect" vhich results in a build-up of reverberent sound in city streets bounded by fairly tall

buildings, can lead to even rather distant listeners being exposed to

higher noise levels than might be expected. These factors need to be

carefully considered vhen developing appropriate measurement methodologies

as veil as vhen assessing the impact of bus noise on the popxilation.

5
h. Major Noise Sources

It is important to identify the major so\irces of noise in buses and

the effect of normal operation on the noise levels associated with each of

these sources. Buses have essentially the same major noise sources as trucks. The primary difference lies in the location of the major noise

components and the shielding provided by the body. Basically the sources

are as follows

:

Engine (Mechanical) Noise - is primarily produced by the combustion

process which produces rapid changes in pressure in the cylinder

which in tiorn results in excited mechanical vibration in the

engine structure. Some of this vibrational energy is

subsequently radiated to the atmosphere as acoustic energy.

Fan Noise - is the result of air flow past the fan blades which

results in rotational (associated with pressure differences

across the fan blades) and turbulent noise (associated with the

eddy flows and vortices shed at the blade edges). Such noise is

related to fan tip speed and air distribution which is governed

by the fan configuration and environment. It should be noted

that buses equipped with rear engines usually have their fans

located on the left hand side (street side) of the vehicle.

Exhaust Noise - is created when high pressure exhaust gases, released

through the engine exhaust valves, excite oscillations in the

exhaust system which are radiated to the atmosphere at the tail

pipe, through the pipe surfaces and through the muffler shell.

The noise is a function of engine type, engine timing, valve

duration time, intake system type, muffler type, size and

location, pipe diameter, pipe bends, dual or single system, etc.

Air-Intake Noise - is created by the opening and closing of the intake

valve which causes the volume of air in the system to pulsate.

Associated noise levels are dependent upon whether the engine is

gasoline or diesel, tiirbocharged or naturally aspirated, 2-cycle

or ^-cycle, the number of cylinders, the engine displacement,

engine rpm, engine load, etc.

Tire-Road Interaction Noise - is related to tire and tread configuration, road surface texture, vehicle speed, load and state of tire

wear. Vibration of the tire carcass and the entrapment and

release of air from tread/pavement interstices appear to be the

major mechanisms for tire noise generation.

Transmission Noise - arises from the meshing of gear teeth in transmission systems and may be apparent under load, no load, or reverse load conditions. The noise may be aggravated by resonance of the gearbox casing or by struct\are-borne components that

excite large bocSy surfaces that act as efficient radiators.

6
Noise from Accessories - is created by blowers, brakes (squeal, air

brake release), generators, air conditioning equipment or miscellaneous equipment such as access and cargo area doors.

Appendix A contains a more detailed discussion of the component noise sources.

5. Modes of Operation

The noise impact of intracity, intercity, school and special purpose

buses depends on the range of possible operational modes and the amount of

time they spend in the community. Intracity buses, for example, operate

almost exclusively in business or residential areas. They normally operate on streets with posted maximum speed limits of 30 mph (H8.3 km/hr) or less, and

stop at passenger pick-up points as well as for traffic — thus, they

accelerate and decelerate frequently. On the other hand, many intercity buses

spend a major portion of their time operating on the open road and only

infrequently enter business and residential areas, e.g., to pick-up or leave

off passengers or cargo at urban depots. These buses normally operate at

cruise speeds in excess of 35 mph (56.U km/hr) on the highway where tire noise

becomes a more significant, if not the dominant, noise source. Operations of

school buses are limited to whatever the posted speed limits happen to be in

the urban, suburban or rural area in which they operate. Like intracity

buses, they make frequent stops at passenger pick-up points as well as for

traffic. School buses accelerate and decelerate frequently; however, on occasion, they maintain cruise speeds in excess of 35 mph (56.U km/hr) on highways

.

In order to develop appropriate, representative, reliable and repeatable

test procedures for determining the noise output of buses, it is appropriate

to consider the various operational modes of each type of bus and the noise

level associated with each particular operational mode. This suggests that

each type of bus be assessed under normal operating conditions in terms of the

actual percentage of time typically spent at idle, acceleration, deceleration,

low speed cruise, high speed cruise and wide open throttle. Such a comprehensive analysis of the various operational modes of buses does not

presently exist.

6. Existing Measurement Procedures

In this section, the existing measurement procedures which are relevant

to determination of the noise emission from buses are presented and compared.

6.1. Exterior Noise

There are basically three existing measurement standards that are applicable to the measurement of the exterior noise produced by buses. They

are

:

T
(1) Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) Standard J366'b — Exterior

Soiond Level for Heavy Trucks and Buses[8],

(2) International Organization for Standardization (ISO)

Recommendation R362 — Measurement of Noise Emitted by

Vehicles[9], and

(3) California Highway Patrol (CHP) Noise Measurement Procedure [ 10 ]

.

To facilitate a discussion of these measurement procedures a table —

Table 3 — has been developed which outlines the pertinent sections of each

of the test methods. This table serves as the basis for comparison among

the three procedures. Complete texts of these standards are reproduced in

Appendix B.

The SAE J366b procedure is the principal standard used in the United

States for measuring the exterior noise from buses. This standard was designed to extract the maximum noise that can be produced by the

propulsion system without considering the influence of tire noise. The

noise level produced d\iring such a test represents the worst-case noise

level for a bus operating under urban driving conditions. Such a test also

represents the worst-case propulsion-system noise contribution to the

over-all noise levels produced by buses at high speeds. This standard is

intended as a design tool and as such the standard recommends that a maximum A-weighted sound level of 88 dB, when measured in accordance with

J366b procedures, be used as a reference in the design and development of

heavy trucks and buses. In addition a 2 dB allowance is recommended for

variations in test site, temperature gradients, test equipment, and

inherent differences in nominally identical vehicles.

The CHP procedure (implementing Section 2Tl60 of the Vehicle Code

which applies to the measurement of noise from new motor vehicles,

including buses, offered for sale in the State of California) is very

similar to the SAE procedure. However, since the vehicles covered by the

CHP test include motorcycles, passenger cars and light trucks, in addition

to mediiom and heavy trucks and buses, the specification of the test site

geometry in the CHP procediire differs from that specified in the SAE

standard. The CHP test site is basically a compromise combination of the

test sites specified in SAE J366b (heavy trucks and buses), SAE J 986a

(passenger cars and light trucks) and SAE XJ331a (motorcycles). Another

difference occurs in the instrumentation requirements. CHP allows the use

of Type 2 or S2A instrumentation in lieu of Type 1 (precision) equipment

for enforcement purposes.

ISO R362 is the applicable international standard for the measurement

of exterior bus noise. The use of this standard is especially widespread

in Europe. This standard also allows the use of essentially Type 2

instr\jmentation. Although all motor vehicles are covered by the standard

(as was the case with the CHP procedure), the test site geometry is very

8
.e 3. ^Esperison of eii.3-i=£ =ea£ .irener- prcced-.ires for ie^e^^iiir^ "he extericr iisise of buses

.

is: Pofa

Vehicles covered '~

s-atlarl

1

Ti-^cks, tr-ich tractors

ani h-^es^' All rotor vehicles Ail motor vehicles

1 1"= 1 30-ind level

re: -Irede-c;

ij;s £1.—it'i^

[2] Alternative neas-

-srenen- sj-sten nee-i--^ "he re-

;.ire:i5'-s of SA£

Zj-z- 1,1 or 32A sound

level ~ecer —eeting the

rec-iren-oOH rf iJiS £1 . —_J"1

Sound level neter Beating the require—

s^ts of IBC meodetiOQ 123—

Test Site level open space free

Iccatei vi-hin IC: ft

IZ ~ of either the

ve.-.iclr path or the

FXat open space free of reflecting Sisrfaces located vithin 100 ft {3C a) of either the vehicle path or the

sricrophone

1

Level, open space of

1ft ft (50 a)

radiiis free of re- fiectiEg surfaces vithin a radius of

82 ft (25 m) froffi the vehicle

Area S-irfEcs

- • Sco specifier^' Concreoe or asphalt Ccncreoe, asphelo or

sijnilar hisrd naterial

Vehicle Path

S-irface Tcnor-rOe :r a=p'al- re,_ — Loncreoe, asphalo :r

Pact

1 £i: f:: ' f: -i aid Zone la;~ -I ft ~

l.e.3" "5 f- 12.5 — So real end none

Accelera*: i ; r. 15 fo • pricr rr 33 ft (IG - pricr o: Esicmpfaone

Mlcrcphcte

location

5C ft (15 = frt=. the centerline of Tehicle pati and h ft (i.2 el). abore tiie gruuud

plane

50 +1 ft frcn ohe centerline c: vehicle

pa-h 0.-1 - - 1 2 ft

: e -.r.-z 'l^re :: tbe

rcar.'av s_ria:e

25 ft (T.5 m) frtH!! Ti;ije centerline of -wehicle path end h ft (1.2 s) above the gro^snd lewel

Vehicle Operation "«ide apea tisrottle

tbrotrtle deceleration

Wide open tiarottie acceleration, closed

tlirotitle deceleration

Wide open thrc^ole

acceleraoicn , soation—

ar;.- —m-op , cons"oani speed passov

Heference Point

jVoEt Of irefeicle (froat aaa rear, if

tbe e^eaist oaeiet^ is

H'B >fc C Xj'f"' f CUVI T ' t \ J\J\y<J ass) frsan the front; rear for r«ar eisgice

ifron". ani e^liaus": i: exha'_=-- lutleo i= re re than 1-2 in. : — -.t- froc the front/

5oo sp-ecifieoftiisntity Measured

soiind level, faso respcnse

»fex-»»nm A-^»eighTed sound level, fast

y,=.x-'— — A-v=-"oesouEd level, faso

Reported Talv;e

in 2 dB of each ether

for tne noisiest side of the vehicle

A- -3 -age of two hi ^est reiiir;= -."ithin 2 dS

eai' :r>_er for one

o:i;:rrt £ L ie of one

ne--.c r=:uir = i for

Ivo r,sa='.ireneno = reo-iired each side, all -.-alo.es reooroed

— Alohou^ not stated in the standard, onis o«o prccednre is, in general, applicaile oo vehicles having a gross vehicle -.-ei^o raolng of 10,001 pomds or greater.

-Aaerican Standard Speoificaoions for So-.:ni level "eoers, SLlIj-lo"^, Azerican National

Standards lnstit'.rte, 5ev "fori, Se-.- "fori .It": [11]. — SAS HecfBimpnded Practice Jlok, Qoalifylng a Sotmd Uata Acquisition Svstez:, Society

of .i-jto!!!Otive Engineers, "Erreniiale, Penrsr.-lvania fl970)[12l.

•^ .-.Ith:-^ not soateo in the standard, test sites ha-re concrete or asphalt paved

neas-.:reaent areas. —

c _

_.:tert.at--;na_ ^rctrotecr- ca_ -cnrtissccn .-econEsniaooons for So-:;nd leve_ Meters,

?-l:li:ation

Specific reference point f the vehicle
similar to the SAE J366b site specifications. The major difference, which

is a common one between international and domestic standards, is the fact

that the measurements are made at 7.5 m (25 ft) instead of 50 ft (15-2 m)

,

respectively.

All three of these procedures measure the same acoustic quantity;

namely, the maximum A-weighted sound level with fast meter response. Also

each of the three procedures utilize the wide-open throttle acceleration

mode of operation as the primary test although procedures for closed

throttle deceleration (SAE/CHP), stationary acceleration (ISO) and

constant speed passby (ISO) tests are also outlined.

Currently within ISO, a revision of R362 is being considered. Review

of a recent draft points out only two significant differences between the

original and revised standard — (l) the revised standard requires the use

of precision instrumentation meeting the requirements of lEC Publication

1T9[1^] and (2) the provisions for a stationary acceleration test and a constant speed passby test have been deleted. In addition to the revision

to ISO R362, a second document is being developed which outlines a survey

method for measurement of noise emitted by stationaiy motor vehicles.

This document provides specifications for instrumentation, test sites,

microphone locations and vehicle operating conditions as part of a procedure for making near-field measurements of exhaust and engine noise.

Since buses are similar to trucks in many respects, another test

method which deserves attention is the stationary acceleration (or

"run-up") test which is one of the tests prescribed in the Federal

interstate motor carrier noise emission standards. Basically this test

specifies that the vehicle should be accelerated with wide open throttle

to its governed engine speed as rapidly as possible. The vehicle is

stationary with its transmission in neutral. One problem with this test

procedure is that its application is limited to vehicles with governed

engines. Also, it should be noted that the data base showing the

correlation between the stationary acceleration test and the low speed

acceleration passby test specified in SAE J366b was established utilizing

trucks, not buses.

6.2. Interior Noise

Until recently, little emphasis has been placed on measurement

standards relating to motor vehicle interior noise. For instance, the

first interior noise level regulation covering buses was enacted in

November 1973. The provisions in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title

U9 - Transportation (U. S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway

Administration), Motor Carrier Safety Regulations, Part 393-9^ - Vehicle

Interior Noise Levels (see Appendix B for complete text) applies to all

commercial trucks and buses operated in interstate commerce. In essence,

the regTilation requires that the A-weighted interior sound levels at the

driver's seating position [6 inches (15-2 cm) to the right of the drivers

right ear] not exceed 90 dB while the vehicle is operated at its maximum

rated or governed engine speed ("high idle").

10
Table 1». Coa^iarlson of existing and proposed measurecsent procediires fcr detemdnin^ the interior noise of b-Ases.

3MCS REaru-.Ti::; - c

-

Vehicles covered

by standard All tr^^cis and buses operated in interstate

coanerce

.

All nctor vehicles intended

for road ;ise including those

vhere the driver and/or passengers occiciy an open cabin or even onl;/' a veildefined space

.

Instr'-ctentat i on Type 2 sound level ineter meeting the requireEents of Aj5S S1.1j-1971

Sound level neter neetir^

the requireEents , of lEC

P-ubli cation l"?^'

Test Site Level open space free of reflecting objects vithin

50 feet (15.2 e) of the

driver's seatir.? tositic—

Level open space free of reflectir^ objects within

65 feet (20 e) of the

vehicle. The test road

shall be hard and as jnC'Oth

ar.i level as possible

Microphone

Location

6 inches (15.2 cm) to the ri^t of, in the sajse plane as, and directly in

line with, the driver's right ear

Enough meas'jring points

should be selected such

that the sound level dis- tribution in the vehicle

is adequately represented with ;-espect to passenger

ear locations for both

seated and^standing

positions^'

Veiiiole Operation

Stationary, high idle Vehicle sta-ionary,

engine accelerated to its rax-'i^!F- governed

STpptl n- "^r-T-rr -rcfpr horsepower and the engine is stabilized at that speed (transnis- sion in neutral)

Stationary

Engine idling at the

speed specified by the

man-ufacturer (trans- nission in neutral)

^fc!ving - juii^ Y^ro'^''tle accelera— tion=/

- Steady speeos

Quantity Measured

Vp.T-:rrF- A-ve-'ghtei so-'-- level, fast response

y^^--_.„ A-ve-'ghtel so—i

level, fast response

P.eportei Value Average of two highest

readings that are vithir.

2 d3 of each other

All '/alues reported

—^Although not specified, the intent is for the neasuresent to be E:ade with

the vehicle positioned on a hard surface.

9/ If additional cueasuring equipisent, e.g., tape recorder, graphic level

recorder, are used, they shall conform to the relevant clauses of lEC Publication 179[l'*]. 'When meastireEents of noise spectra are desired, the

filters shall meet the require-ents of lEC Publication 225[l5l. —^One nseasuring point at the driver's position. Hormally it is sufficient

to have additional meesureiaent points at the middle and rear of the

vehicle, preferably at positions adjacent to the longitudinal axis of the

vehicle. The nicrophone is located horizontally at a position 0.65 +_ 0.05 e

above the seat and 0.2 + 0.02 m to the ri^t (to the left for ri^t-hand

driven vehicles) of the middle plane of the seat. —^Full throttle acceleration test — stabilize engine and vehicle speed then

fully open throttle as fast as possible recording the sound until 90? of

the engine speed for naxiaue power or 120 iWh is reached. (Initial operating conditions are specified for vehicles with both rrpn ^igi and autcEStic transnissions .

)

12/ _ =— Steady speed tests — m the range of 37 Esph (60 lat/hr} or ^OS of r-cirii-nn^ vehicle speed {whichever is lower) to 75 mph (120 Jci/hr] or -S05 of naxiEUE

vehicle speed ^whichever is lower). A-weighted sound levels are to be

deternined at at least 5 speeds at equal ir.ter-.-als covering the above range.
A draft proposal for methods of measurement of noise inside motor

vehicles has been developed and is presently being circulated to the

member nations for voting as an ISO Draft International Standard. Rather

than discuss the details of this proposed standard, Table h has been

developed "which allows comparison between pertinent sections of the Bureau

of Motor Carrier Safety (BMCS) regulations and the ISO Draft International

Standard.

A review of Table k shows the complexity — in terms of the number of

measurement positions as well as the niimber of vehicle operational modes

to be tested — of the proposed ISO procedure when contrasted against the

single microphone location, single vehicle operational mode specified by

BMCS in their regulations. However, it shoiild be remembered that the ISO

procediire applies to all motor vehicles. Therefore, one would hope that

the number of tests could be reduced when only a single vehicle type,

e.g., a bus, is considered.

"J. Data Base and Correlations

13/ Very limited data— exist m the public domain on the noise levels

associated with bus operations. This is due, in part, to the fact that in

the United States, mediiom and heavy duty trucks as well as buses, having a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of 10,001 pounds (^5^5 kg) or greater,

are tested according to the same test procedure. This procedure specifies

a single recommended sound level to be met by both trucks and buses. The

measurement method provides for the determination of the maxim\am

A-weighted sound level output of a vehicle during a low speed acceleration

passby (high engine speed, low vehicle speed) as measured in the

free-field over a reflecting plane. Since medium trucks and buses tended

to be quieter than heavy trucks under these conditions, the majority of

the emphasis has been placed on research and development programs aimed at

reducing heavy truck noise.

There may be some proprietory data which have been obtained by the

bus industry but it appears doubtful that these data are sufficiently

extensive to provide EPA with even a substantial fraction of the

information needed for a comprehensive analysis of the economic costs and

technical feasibility associated with a given regulation. Furthermore, it

is evident that there are practically no data available upon which to base

an evaluation of alternative bus noise measurement procedures or to

establish correlations between the noise associated with various

operational modes and the noise measured utilizing various test

procedures

.

Thus, it appears that EPA will have to generate a rather extensive

physical data base and investigate alternative measurement procedures

prior to formulation of the Notice of Proposed Rule Making. — Most buses sold in the United States today exhibit exterior A-weighted

noise levels of 86 dB or less measured according to SAE J366b procedures.

Typically, school buses are in the range 79-86 dB while intercity and

intracity buses are in the range 8U-86 dB. Maximum interior levels are typically 80-81+ dB[5].

12
8. Overview of Bus Noise Measurement Difficulties

In this section, the information discussed in Sections 2 through 7 of

this report serves as the basis for an overview of bus noise measurement

problems. Utilizing this information, potential noise measurement problems

that could hinder the promulgation and/or enforcement of future noise

regulations to control noise emission from buses are identified.

Prior to the establishment of an appropriate measurement procedure

that can be utilized for determining the exterior and interior noise of

buses, certain informational requirements must be satisfied. These

include: (l) a product classification scheme, (2) typical usage data

(normal use conditions and range) and the effects of operation and

environment on noise levels, and (3) the effects of bus noise on people.

Such data allows one to select, with confidence, the acoustic quantity to

be measured, the operational mode of the vehicle, and the locations for

microphones which need to be specified in the regulatior . Test site

specifications and instrumentation requirements also hinge on the

availability of this fxandamental information.

8.1. Classification

Some of the factors associated with establishment of bus classes have

been discussed in Section 2. There are actually two major purposes for bus

classification in conjunction with noise regulations.

1. In order to establish different measurement procedures, or variations of the same measurement procediore, for buses which

have different operational characteristics or which exhibit

important variations in their acoustical characteristics.

2. In order to set different noise limits on different categories of

buses, either because they are used differently and thus affect

people in different ways or because of economic cost and

technological feasibility of noise control as applied to the

various classes of buses.

At present, sufficient data to allow correlations between the classes

of buses — categorized by engine type, weight, carrying capacity, intended

usage, etc. — and the resultant noise levels characteristic of each class over the range of normal operation do not exist.

8.2. Relation of Physical Measures to Effects /Normal Use

The test procedure established for bus exterior and interior noise

measurements should be such that the measured noise levels are representative of typical operation and not necessarily maximum levels.

At least three types of measurements come to mind when one considers

measurement procedures which will permit adequate assessment of the noise

exposures of the several groups affected:

13
•Sideline "far-field" noise, representative of that which is radiated

to listeners located hack from the side of a road or highway in a rather open area.

•Sideline "near-field" noise, representative of that which is heard bypersons waiting at "bus stops, by passing pedestrians and motorists and

by those working or living very near the street.

Noise inside the bus, representative of that heard by the passengers

and drivers. Sub-cases include windows opened or closed and bus

operating in a free field over a reflecting plane or near a reflecting

surface (i.e., building or other vehicle). All of these exposure

conditions occ\ir for various operational modes of the bus

.

In general, products have a range of possible operational modes with

the noise emission characteristics dependent on how they operate. The key

to deciding upon the mode or modes of operation of a vehicle that should be

specified for noise test purposes hinges on the knowledge of how the

vehicle is "normally" operated. In order to determine "normal operation" a usage survey should be conducted. Such data do not presently exist for

buses.

In selecting appropriate operating procedures for use in bus noise

tests, it is important to consider which of the major noise sources —

engine (including exhaust, intake and cooling system), transmission

(including — gear box, drive shaft and drive axle(s)) and tires — are important during the several modes of operation of buses. For instance,

the low speed, acceleration test specified in SAE J366b includes engine

noise and that part of transmission noise associated with the particTilar

gear in which the vehicle is operated. It is assumed that the results of a J366b test are essentially vinaffected by tire/road interaction noise.

However, as the noise levels for sources other than tires are lowered, it

is possible that tire noise may become a significant factor at the maximum

speed allowed in a J366b test.

There is need to establish correlations between the noise emitted by

buses in various operational modes and the noise emitted during simulated

operations which may be much more convenient from a testing point of view;

for example, a stationary run-up instead of a J366b passby.

8.3- Quantity Measured

The EPA "levels document" utilizes the equivalent A-weighted sound

level as the appropriate quantity to use in characterizing noise exposure.

Thus, it would be desirable if the quantity (or quantities) measured in a regulation on a specific noise source, e.g., a bus, could be easily and

directly related to the contribution which the source makes to the

equivalent A-weighted sound level for typical listeners . To the extent

that a bus behaves like an acoustic monopole — with uniform sound

radiation in all directions — it makes sense to measure the maximum

Ih
A-weighted sound level at a particular microphone location during a vehicle passby. This measure of source strength can then "be used to

estimate the contribution which that soiorce makes to the equivalent sound

level at some other location. Data obtained on trucks and automobiles

indicate that the sound level 50 feet (15.2 m) to the side of the vehicle

centerline can be used fairly reliably to predict noise levels further

from the vehicle. One can infer that this would also be the case for

buses

Conversely, it is highly questionable as to whether or not the

maximum noise level at 50 feet (15*2 m) can be used to infer the

contribution which a bus passby makes to the equivalent sound level at

distances much closer to the bus — distances which correspond to

passengers at bus stops and other pedestrians. The lack of adequate

correlation which has been observed (for trucks) between maximiom noise

levels at 50 feet (15-2 m) and 25 feet {1.6 m) makes it unlikely that

adequate correlation with 50 foot (15"2 m) data will be observed for distances still closer to a bus.

In order to ascertain the contribution which buses make to the

"reverberant level" in city streets with tall buildings on either side, it

is necessary to consider whether or not the noise emission from buses is

highly directional. If so, it might be necessary to measure the noise

level in several directions from the bus.

Hopefully adequate correlations can be established to enable

collapsing the number of measurement positions to a very few. However, it seems evident that a comprehensive experimental program is needed to guide

and justify such simplification.

Since it is probable that new types of buse^j^will be developed in the

near future, either through the Transbus Programs— or through private

enterprise which use different types of power plants (such as a gas

turbine engine) from those in current buses, it is necessary to address

the question of whether the A-weighted sound level is an adequate metric

for other than gasoline or diesel powered buses. For instance, what

provisions, if any, should be made to account for different spectral

characteristics, the presence of discrete pure tones and/or impulsive

components?

Q.k. Acoustic Environment

There appears to be general agreement that the noise emission from

motor vehicles should be measured in a free field over a reflecting plane.

If a 50 foot (15.2 m) measurement distance is utilized, a rather large

open area is needed plus a roadway of sufficient length to accomodate the

specified operational mode(s) of the vehicle.

Although considerable uniformity of testing has been achieved by the

SAE and ISO in defining standard noise measurement procedures , there — The Transbus Program, sponsored by the U. S. Department of Transportation/

Urban Mass Transit Administration (UMTA) , has as its objective the development of a totally new concept bus design by 19TT. This program is discussed further in Appendix C.

15
remains a small "but important variation between noise measurements made at

different sites, or at different times at the same site. Experience to

date with measiirement of motor vehicle noise at 25 to 50 foot (T.6 to 15.2

m) distances, for typical microphone heights, indicates that the levels

measured are sensitive to the characteristics of the surrounding ambient

(air temperature, humidity, atmospheric pressure), to the characteristics

of the reflecting plane (acoustic impedance, flatness), to temperature

gradients above the plane (which depend on present and past air

temperatures, sunlight, and wind velocities as well as the emittance and

absorptance of the reflecting plane) , and to atmospheric inhomogeneities

(wind velocity and local turbulance). All of these factors influence the

generation of noise by the propulsion system and associated auxiliary

equipment, the radiation from the source into the surrounding atmosphere

and/or the propagation from the immediate vicinity of the vehicle to the

measurement location.

Since these factors influence reliable measurements of many of the

sources which EPA is, or will be, regulating, there is a need for the

various environmental and site effects to be systematically investigated so that: (l) noise measurements taken at a given site can be corrected to

standard environmental conditions, (2) noise measurements taken at

different sites under the same environmental conditions can be correlated

and, therefore, (3) noise measurements taken at different sites under any

environmental conditions can be correlated. If correction factors are not

feasible then there is a need for a site calibration procedure and/ or definition of limiting test conditions.

One must also be concerned with the environment inside a bus. The

volume of the bus interior, the sound absorption of the walls, floor and

ceiling as well as the interior furnishings, and the location of both the

noise sources and the receivers must be carefully evaluated.

These are some of the factors which should be addressed. In general,

these are factors over which one has little or no control.

8.5- Instrmentation

The instrumentation section of the regulation should require equipment

meeting the Type 1 requirements of American National Standard

Specifications for Sound Level Meters, Sl.i|-19Tl[ll] • In addition,

pertinent sections of American National Standard Methods for the

Measurement of Sound Pressure Levels, SI .13-19Tl[l5 ] shoiild be

incorporated. For instruments for which standards do not exist, or where

existing standards are not sufficient, the regulation should include

specific criteria for evaluating the performance of such devices. For

example, a critical deficiency in existing standards is that the response

of instrumentation to transient signals, e.g., vehicle passbys, is not well

defined.

It is important to state clearly in the regiilation the allowable

tolerances for frequency response, environmental effects, harmonic

distortion, etc., which the instr^uments are required to meet. These

16
specifications should be applied not only to specific components of the

system but to the overall system as well. The overall system measurement

error should not be degraded below that allowed for direct measurements

regardless of the instrumentation configuration.

In addition, overall system calibration should be required at

frequent stipulated intervals. The fact that each component of a system

appears satisfactory does not ensure that the system performance will be

acceptable

8.6. Alternative Test Procedures

It is not seriously suggested that a bus noise regulation should

explicitly require measurements corresponding to all possible exposure

conditions coupled with all possible bus operational modes. However, it

is important to consider the prevalance of each condition, perhaps in

terms of its contribution to L or L, , when evaluating the effects of

eq dn

bus noise on the populace. If several exposure conditions are found to be

important, hopefully correlations can be developed which will enable

collapsing the several cases into one or two measurements.

Because of the space, weather and time constraints associated with

the existing low speed acceleration test procedures, it seems appropriate

to investigate alternative procedures which would be simpler to perform

yet correlatable with the "real world" situation. The Bureau of Motor

Carrier Safety presently utilizes a stationary vehicle test procedure with

the engine stabilized at its maximum rated or governed engine speed (high

idle) as the basis for its regulation of truck and bus (interstate)

interior cab noise. Present Federal noise certification procedures for

interstate motor carriers also specify a stationary run-up test — the

engine is accelerated as rapidly as possible to its governed speed at wide

open throttle (transmission in neutral). One of the main difficulties

with stationary test procedures is the fact that noise associated with the

gear train is not evaluated. Also, stationary procedures such as the

stationary run-up test are limited in their applicability — in this case

the test can only be utilized on vehicles with governed engines. Although

stationary tests probably take less time lo perform and require less space

(smaller test sites), all of the weather constraints which limit testing

when the passby method is utilized would also be a problem with the

stationary test. '

Since the weather is a major limiting factor for all outdoor tests,

it would seem logical to investigate the feasibility of indoor testing.

If indoor testing were to be chosen as part of a standard or regulation, a testing fa.cility would have to be specified in great detail and identical

facilities would have to be constructed by each manufacturer — small or

large. It would appear to be prohibitively expensive to construct a facility to allow for 15 '2 meters measurements; yet, measurements any closer

than 15- 2 meters would be questionable without extensive research to provide

insight into the near field/ far field effects and to establish the

correlation between the res\ilts obtained according to such procedures with

IT
what the community experiences when a bus passes by. Also, the practical

problem of removing the heat and exhaust f\mes from the operating vehicle

would have to be dealt with.

Any alternative procedures will have pros and cons associated with

them; but they have almost no data base or experience base to back them up.

Much research would be necessary before such procediires could be utilized

as a measurement methodology for regulating the exterior or interior noise

of buses.

9. Appendix A. A Discussion of Truck Subsource Nois e^

4 Engine (mechanical)

The engine and transmission form a complex acoustical system composed

of a large number of sources, the most important of which resiilt from the

increase in pressure within the cylinder during combustion of the fuel.

This rapid rise of cylinder pressure excites mechanical vibrations in the

engine structure. Some of this vibrational energy is subsequently radiated

into the atmosphere as acoustic energy. The gas forces are also transmitted thro\igh the piston and crank mechanism to the main bearings and

hence excite flexible or mobile structures coupled to the crankshaft. Most

of the noise generated by these mechanisms is radiated by the crankcase,

oil pan, clutch housing and valve covers. The noise level produced by both

gasoline and diesel engines depends upon engine size, speed and load. The

noise level depends more on engine speed than on size, so that for a given

horsepower, the quieter engines are associated with a larger displacement

and slower engine speed. In practice there is a significant range in

engine (mechanical) noise levels for a given engine size. Calculating the

effect of engine noise on the overall vehicle noise level is diffic\ilt

because the noise produced by a given engine depends upon the way in which

it is mounted so that the level varies with the type of bus in which it is

installed.

Gasoline engines initiate combustion with a flame which smoothly

spreads throughout the cylinder until the fuel-air mixture is burned.

Diesel engines, on the other hand, rely on much higher compression ratios

to produce spontaneous combustion which rapidly oxidizes the fuel. This causes a more rapid change in pressure in the cylinder which in turn

results in increased engine vibration and hence higher noise levels.

The primary combustion forces occur at the relatively low fundamental

firing frequencies but the structiire responds to the higher harmonics as well. Fuel injection equipment, pistons, valve train, gearing and accessories, all integral with or attached to the engine frame, contribute at

various frequencies to deflect or vibrate the engine structiare. — The material in this appendix was mainly derived from Wyle Laboratory

reports to EPA[5,1T] on transportation noise and a cost-effectiveness

study of major sources of bus noise and from material presented in the

SAE Twentieth L. Ray Buckendale Lecture on truck noise control[l8].

18
The engine itself contains several areas which vihrate and radiate

noise. The blocks of V engines act as tuning forks while in-line engine

blocks vibrate as beams. The notion of these relatively thin case block

sxirfaces as well as sheet-netal components such as the oil pan, rocker arm

cover, oil sunps, etc., which are attached to the vibrating structure, all

increase the ncise radiated to the atmosphere.

The character cf zhe combustion forces can be changed advantageously

by turbo charging. Turbocharging , which increases the pressure of the inlet

air above atmospheric pressure, reduces the combustion force impact by

making the pressure rise more gradual; thus, decreasing the noise radiated.

Sheetmetal parts nay be vibration isolated from the movement of the engine

by use of soft gaskets and rubber washers at the mounting bolts. Engine

covers using high density barrier materials lined with absorbent materials

are the most effective way of reducing engine noise but have the

disadvantages of reduced accessibility to the engine, reduced cooling

efficiency, added weight, and potential fire hazards due to leaking oil

being absorbed by the acoustical liners (which also destroys the noise

absorption characteristics). Shielding under the engine can be effective

in clocking the reflected path of noise from the engine to the receiver by

way cf a paved surface.

• Zxhaust Sz.'sten I^oise

Exhaust noise is generated by the rapid release of high pressure com- bustion gases when the exhaust valve opens. In addition to the discharge

noise — noise radiated to the atmosphere at the tail pipe outlet — this

rapid release of pressure excites oscillations of the muffler shell and

exhaust and tail pipe surfaces which are radiated in the atmosphere as noise. Transmission loss through the pipes and flexible connections and

gas leaks are additional noise sources within the exhaust system. In the

past, the outlet noise has overshadowed the other exhaust system soiorces

however, as the outlet noise is reduced by use of improved m\ifflers , the

pipe and shell noise become more significant contributors.

The primary' frequency components of exhaust noise are dependent upon

engine speed, number of cylinders, exhaust system configuration (single or dual exhausts) and whether the engine is a 2-cycle or i+-cycle engine. Its

amplitude is dependent upon ignition timing, throttle setting and engine

load (pressure in the cylinder when the valve opens).

Mufflers or resonators are typically utilized to control exhaust

discharge noise. The performance of these devices is very dependent upon

other acoustic elements within the system such as the engine and the length

and diameter of both the exhaust and tail pipes. In addition to providing

effective noise reduction, mufflers must be designed to produce a tolerable

back pressure on the engine.

Muffler shell noise and pipe-radiated noise are similar in nature.

General approaches to pipe and shell noise reduction include reducing the

19
distance between the muffler and the manifold by utilizing a shorter

exhaust pipe, by concealing pipes vith shielding or by routing the pipes

behind other bus components, or by utilizing damping materials to reduce

muffler and pipe vibration.

Noise also can be produced by engine brakes which, when in use essen- tially convert a power producing dies el engine into a power absorbing air

compressor. This is accomplished through a master-slave piston arrangement

which opens cylinder exhaust valves near the top of the normal compression

stroke releasing the compressed air charge to the exhaust manifold. The

blowdown of compressed air to atmospheric pressure prevents the retvirn of

energy to the engine piston on the expansion stroke, the effect being a net

energy loss since the work done in compressing the cylinder charge is not

returned during the expansion process. Since the diesel engine is turned

over by the driving wheels of a vehicle descending a hill through the

vehicle drive line and transmission, application of the engine brake

retards the "free-wheeling" effect of the driving wheels and a braking

action results . Advantages such as elimination of continual braking with

the vehicle service brakes, ability to maintain engine operating

temperatures on down grades, increased life of brake components and tires

and added safety make this device a popular option in certain geographical

areas. The noise produced by the blowdown of the compressed air to the

atmosphere is generally controlled by making improvements to the engine

brake itself or through the use of improved mufflers.

• Cooling System Noise

The fan is the predominant noise so\irce in the cooling system. The

fan, as an air moving device, creates lift forces to cause air motion.

Since the lift force is the result of a pressure difference across the fan

blade, the lift force actually rotates with the blades and, relative to a fixed point, fluctuates each time a blade passes setting up piolsations in

the surrounding area. Such pulsations result in the generation of a fundamental tone, associated with the blade passage frequency, and higher

order harmonics. Non-uniform air flow across the face of the fan (due to

improper distribution of the air from the radiator) and obstructions near the fan such as hoses, alternators, etc., which create air flow irregularities intensify the fan noise problem. In addition, random pressure

fluctuations, resulting in broadband noise, are caused by the non-coherent

shedding of vortices from trailing edges of the blades and by turbulence

generated upstream of the fan arising from the passage of the cooling air over the tube and fin surfaces of the radiator.

An obvious approach to reduce cooling system noise is to increase

cooling efficiency and thus allow for decreased fan speed. A larger fan

turning at a slower speed which can be swept over a larger radiator core area with possibly a lower tip speed has obvious advantages. Fan shrouds

can also be used to prevent air recirculation through the fan, thereby

enstiring that all of the air pumped by the fan has passed throiogh the

radiator to provide cooling. The clearance between the outer edges of the

fan blades and the shroud (tip clearance) can also be a major factor. To

20
ensure opt i mm noise reduction the tip clearance should be as small as practical.

Cooling systems are designed for "worst case" situations vhich seldom

occur. In actual service conditions, the heat load is such that full fan

speed is not required much of the time. The critical condition for buses

from a cooling demand standpoint, is when the vehicle is fully loaded and

is ascending a long grade at full engine power but low road speed. Fans

operating at full speed are necessary during this period to provide

necessary cooling in the absence of the ram air effect. Additionally, fans are usually operating when the vehicle is idling; however, the fan is not

operating at its maxim\am rpm and therefore the noise generation is not

significant. At fan speeds of less than 16OO rpm the fan noise is sufficiently less than the fan noise at governed engine speed (usually about 2100

rpm) and therefore the contribution to the overall noise level of the

vehicle is not significant.

On the basis of the previous discussion, it appears that the obvious

approach to the fan noise problem would be the utilization of a demand fan

in place of a direct drive fan. Clutched fan drives — either on-off or modulating — do exist on the market today (in limited quantities);

however, they are not widely utilized in buses at the present time. Such

fans are thermostatically controlled and operate only when needed. On-off

fans are either full-on or full-off, in other words, when cooling is needed

the fan comes ftill-on and remains on until the cooling demand has been

satisfied. The speed of the modulating fan varies to compensate for the

heat rejection demands of the engine and seldom is at "full-on" condition.

Present limited data[l9»20] utilizing trucks equipped with demand fans

indicate that actual fan "on time" is on the order of a few percent of

engine on time under actual over-the-road conditions. Such fan clutches

are not prevalent at the present time; however, the promulgation of new

noise regulations which accept the higher noise levels during that small

percentage of the time when the heat rejection demand on the cooling system

is high in order to achieve lower noise emissions the remainder of the time

shoiild alter this situation.

• Air Intake Noise

Engine air- intake noise is produced by the intake pulsations on

i+-cycle naturally aspirated engines, by blower blades on a turbocharged

engine, and by blower lobe passage disturbances on pressure scavenged

2-cycle engines

Intake systems are similar to exhaust systems in that the components

and problems are much the same; however, each intake system must be treated

individually since both the frequency and amplitude of intake noise varies

with engine type. Low frequency intake noise is generally controlled by

the use of properly designed and located large volume air-cleaners matched

to the intake pipe. Tuned silencers are usually required to reduce the

21
high frequency components of intake noise. Location of the air intake

openings, e.g., toward the front of the vehicle rather than to the side, can also be effective in controlling intake noise as observed by a bystander along the road.

At present, the air intake system is not a major contributor to

overall bus noise levels for most manufacturers; however, as overall noise

levels are reduced, the intake system will have to be re-evaluated.

• Tire-Road Interaction Noise

The physical mechanisms of the production of noise by the tire-road

interaction process are not well understood. The general consensus is that

air pmping (entrapment and release of air from the tire tread cavities)

and vibration of the tire carcass are the major mechanisms contributing to

the generation and radiation of acoustic energy. However, the effect of

tread design (rib, crossbar), effect of road surface, effect of wear, and

the effect of load on the noise levels produced are known. The existing

data do not provide the basis for the design of quieter tires.

Bus tread designs for highway usage can be classified basically into

two categories — rib and cross-bar. Rib type tires, with the major tread

elements oriented in the circumferential direction, possess characteristics

that are suitable for all wheel locations. These tires are noted for their

lateral traction and uniform wear characteristics. Cross-bar tires are used primarily on the drive axles. This design, with the major tread

elements oriented in the lateral direction, gives maximum driving traction,

provides a much more rigid tread structure, and provides greater original

design tread depth. The final choice of which type of tire is utilized

depends on many factors , some of which include the original cost of the

tire, a concept of the safety provided by a given tire and a knowledge of

the company's policy on retreading. The true cost of a tire (cost/mile) is

dependent, for instance, on the number of times a carcass — be it rib or cross-bar tread design originally — will be retreaded. Many bus operators

prefer not to use recapped tires and they bioy special tires that come with

a thick layer of rubber under the original tread. After the original tread

has been worn down, a new tread may be grooved into this layer and the tire

reused.

Cross-bar tires, as a generic group, are noisier than the rib-tread

tires. The difference between the quietest cross-bar tire and the noisiest

rib tire is typically k-Q dB. Also of interest is the fact that only a 1

to 2 dB decrease is observed between the quietest rib tire and a completely

smooth tread. Therefore, a breakthroiigh in basic tire design appears to be

needed before tires exhibiting significantly lower noise levels could be

manufactured. Such a breakthrough does not appear to be imminent.

Road surface conditions do influence tire noise levels; however, the

effect depends on the tire type, for instance, cross-bar tires generally

22
produce higher noise leA'"els when running on a rougher surface hut in any case the influence is not very significant. Rib tires tend to get noisier

as the surface gets rougher. It should be noted at this point that no method now exists for quantitatively characterizing the surface roughness

or texture of pavements typical on today's roads. Until the surface texture can be physically characterized, little can be known about the effect

of surface roughness on the generation of tire noise.

It is known that sound levels rise with increasing speed for all

tires, but at slightly different rates. Empirically, tires are characterized by an increase of 6 to 12 dB for a doubling of vehicle speed

in the range of 30 to 60 mph (U8.3 to 96.5 km/hr). Theoretical

considerations supporting relationships in which sound level increases as either 30 log-j^QV or kO log-^V, where V is speed, have been developed.

This is within the range or the empirical data.

Load is also an important parameter. The increase in sound level

that exists between the unloaded and loaded condition is significant for

cross-bar tires. As the load is increased for tread designs of the

cross-bar type, more of the tire load is carried on the outer sections of

the tread where the most drastic interruptions in tread pattern exist.

Rib tires are relatively unaffected by load. In this case the rib

pattern is the same across the width of the tire and, hence, it is not

important how much load is carried on the outer edges of the tire.

Tread wear is another variable that can greatly affect the sound

level generated by tires. Tire noise generally increases between the new

and half-worn states and depending on the tire type either increases or decreases with additional wear. It appears that the factor controlling

the change in noise level with wear is the change in tread curvature.

Other factors — inflation pressure, tire temperature, etc. — also can influence tire noise but their effect is not thought to be as great as those parameters discussed above.

23
10. Appendix B. Existing Noise Measurement Procedures Pertinent to Buses

EXTERIOR SOUND LEVEL FOR

HEAVY TRUCKS AND BUSES—SAE J366b SAE Standard ^6/

H>|,..rl of Vrhirlr Sout.d l^vrl Cuiumilirr •|,|it..vrd Jult l'K>'>iiid liil rr^Jicd Apr.] I'tT]

;. Inlroduclion—Thii SAE Sondard establishes the test piocedure,

(•M\ irontncnt. and instrumentation for determining the inaxinjum exIrrior sound level for highway motor trucks, truck tractors, and buses.

I he Ai)prndix contains the recommendations of SAE for maximum

sound level2. Inslrumentalion—The following instrumentation shall be used, where applicable, for the measurement required:

2.1 A sound level meter which meets the Type 1 requiienicnts of ANSI SI 4-1971. Specification for Sound Level Meiers.

2.1.1 As an alternative to making direct measurements using a sound

level meter, a microphone or sound level meter may be used with a magnetic tape recorder and/or a graphic level recorder or indicating meter, providing the system meets the requirements of SAE J

184. 2.2 A sound level calibrator (see paragraph 5.2.3). 2.3 An engine-speed tachometer (see paragraph 5.1.1).

}. Test Site

5.1 A suitable test site shall consist of a level open space free of

large leflecting surfaces, such as parked \ehitles. signl)oard$. buildings, or hillsides, located within 100 ft (30 m) of either the vehicle path or

the microphone. See Fig. 1. 5.2 The microphone shall be located 50 ft (15 m) from the center

line of the vehicle path and 4 ft (1.2 m) above the ground plane. The

normal to the vehicle path from the microphtjne shall establish the microphone point on the vehicle path.

5.5 An acceleration point shall be established on the vehicle path

50 ft (15 m) before the microphone point.

3.4 An end point shall be established on the vehicle path 100 ft (30 m) from the acceleration point and 50 ft (15 m) from the micro phone point.

S.i The end zone is the last 40 ft (12 ni) of vehicle path prior to the end point.

3.6 The measurement area shall be the triangular area formed by

the acceleration poini. the end point, and the microphone location.

3.7 The reference point on the vehicle, to indicate when the

vehicle is at any of the points on the vehicle path, shall be the front of the \ehicle except as follows:

3 7 1 If the horizontal distance from the front of the vehicle to the exhaust outlet is more than 200 in (5080 mm), tests shall be run using both the front and tear of the vehicle as reference points

3.7.2 If the engine is located rearward to the center of the chassis, the rear of the \ehicle shall be used as the reference point.

3.8 During measurement, the surface of the ground within the incasurcmeni area shall be free from powdery snow, long grass, loose

soil, and ashes.

3.9 Because bystanders have an appreciable influence on meter re- sponse when ihev are in the vicinity of the vehicle or microphone, not more ihan one person, other than the observer reading the meter, shall be within 50 ft (15 m) of the vehicle path or instrument, and that person

shall be directly behind the observer reading the meter, on a line thioiigh the microphone and the observer

3.10 The ambient sound level (including wind effects) coming from

sources other than the vehicle being measured shall be at least 10 dB(A)

lower ihan the level of the tested vehicle.

3.11 The vehicle path shall be relatively smooth, dry concrete or

asphalt, free of extraneous material such as gravel

^. Procedure

4,1 Vehicle Operalion—Full throttle acceleration and closed throttle deceleration tests are to be used. A beginning engine speed and

proper gear ratio must be determined for use during measurements.

4.1.1 Select the highest rear axle and/or transmission gear ("highest gear" is used in the usual sense; it is svnon\mous to the lowest numer

ical ratio) anti an initial velticle speed such that at wide-open throttle the vehicle will accelerate from the acceleration point:

(a) Starting at no more than two-thirds (60%) of maximum rated

or of governed engine speed.

(b) Reaching maximum rated or governed engine speed within the end zone.

(c) Without exceeding 35 mph (56 km/h) before reaching the end

point.

4.1.1.1 Should maximum rated or governed rpm be attained before reaching the end zone, decrease the approach rpm in 100 rpm incre- ments until maximum rated or governed rpm is attained within the

end zone.

4.1.1.2 Should maximum rated or governed rpm not be attained

until beyond the end zone, select the next lower gear until inaximuni

i.Tied or governed rpm is ati.iiiir<l wiiliin the end zone.

4 1.1.3 Should the lowest gear still result in reaching maximum

raleti or governed rpm be\oiid the permissible end zone, unload the vehule and or inciease the approach rpm in 100 rpm increments until the Tiiaxiniiim laied or governed rpm is reached within the end zone

4.1.2 For the acceleration test, approach the acceleration point using

ihe engine speed and gear ratio selected in paragraph 4.1.1 and at the

acceleraiion point rapiilh esial)lish wide-open iliroiile The vehicle ref erence shall be as indicated in paragraph 3.7. Acceleration shall con

timic until rnaxinium r.TU-d or goxeined engine speeil is reached.

4-1.3 Wheel slip which affects maximum sound level must be avoided

4 1.4 For the deceleration test, approach the microphone point at iiijxiinuin rated or governed engine sj>eed in the gear selected for the

acceleration test. At the miciophone point, close the throttle an<l allow

the vehicle lo decelerate to one half of maximum rated or of gov- erned engine speed. The vehicle reference shall be as indicated in paragraph 3.7. If the vehicle is equipped with an exhaust brake, this deceleration test is to be repeated with the brake full on immediately

following closing of the throttle.

4.2 Measurements

4 2.1 The meter shall be set for "fast" response and the A-weighted

network. 4.22 The meter shall be observed during the period while the vehicle is acceler iiing or deceleraiing 1 he applicable reading shall be

ihe highest sound level obtained for the run. 1 he observer is cautioned

to rerun the test if unrelated peaks should occur due to extraneous ambient noises. Readings shall be taken on both sides of the vehicle.

4 2 3 The sound level for each side of the vehicle shall be the average of the two highest readings which are within 2 dB of each other Report the .vound level for the side of the vehicle with the highest readings.

5. General Comments — Measurements shall be made only when wind

velocity is below 12 mph (19 km/h).

5.1 It is strongly recommended that technically trained personnel

select the equipment and that tests are conducted only by (jualified per sons trained in the current techniques of sound measurement.

5.2 Proper usage of all test instrumentation is essential to obtain

valid measurements. Operating manuals or other literature furnished by the instrument manufacturer should be referred to for both recom- mended operation of the instrument and precautions to be observed.

Specific items to be considered are: 5.2 I The effects of ambient weather conditions on the performance

FIG 1-MINIMUM UNIDIRECTIONAL TEST SITE (SEE PAR* GRAPH 3.1)

Reprinted with permission, "Copyright ©Society of Automotive Engineers,

Inc., 1975, All rights reserved."

2k
of all iintriimnits (foi rxamplc, Icnipcuturc, humidity, and baromciric

prrSMirc).Pioper signal lc\rls. leiininating impedances, and cable Icngthj on niuUi insiruincni measurement systems.

5.2.S Proper acoustical calibration procedure, to include the in fluence of extension cables, etc. Field calibration shall be made im- mediately before and after each test sequence. Internal calibration means is acceptable for field use, provided that external calibration is accomplished immediately before or after field use.

i.$ Vehicles used for tests must not be operated in a manner luch

that the break-in procedure specified by the manufacturer is violated.

<, J?e/erenfej—Suggested reference material is as followi: ANSI SI. I I960. Acoustical Terminology ANSI SI.2-1967, Physical Measurement of Sound

ANSI SI.4- 1971, Specificalion fur Sound l evel Meiers

Applications for copies of these documents should be addressed to the American National Standards Institute, Inc., 1450 Broadway, New

York. New York 10018. APPENDIX

The SAE recommends that a maximum A weighted sound level of 88 dB when measure^, in accordance with the test procedure described above be used as a reference in the design and development of heavy

trucks and buses. An additional 2 dB allowance over the sound level limit is recom- mended to provide for variations in test site, temperature gradients,

lest equipment, and inherent differencci in nominally identical

vehicles.

25
CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL NOISE MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE

EDITED FOR NEW VEHICLES

ORDER ADOPTING, AMENDING, OR REPEALING

REGULATIONS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE

CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL

After proceedings had in accordance vith the provisions of the

Administrative Procedure Act (Gov. Code, Title 2, Div. 3, Part 1, Chapter

and pursuant to the authority vested by Section 2ii02 of the Vehicle Code, and

to implement 5 interpret, or make specific Sections 23130 and 27l60 of the

Vehicle Code, the Department of the California Highway Patrol hereby adopts,

amends, or repeals regulations in Chapter 2, Title 13, California

Administrative Code, as follows:

(l) Amends Article 10, Subchapter h to read:

Article 10. Vehicle Noise Measurement

lOUo. Scope of Regulations . This article contains procedures

implementing Section 23130 of the Vehicle Code which applies to the

measurement of noise from motor vehicles and comb Lns.tions of vehicles subject

to registration when operated on a highway and Section 27l60 of the Vehicle

Code which applies to the measurement of noise from new motor vehicles offered

for sale.

lOUl. Definitions . The following definitions shall apply wherever the

terms are used in this article:

(a) First Gear . The "first gear" is the highest numerical gear ratio of

the transmission which is commonly referred to as low gear.

(b) Maximum RPM . The "maximum rpm" is the maximum governed engine

speed, or if ungoverned, the rpm at maximum engine horsepower as determined by

the engine manufacturer in accordance with the procedures in SAE J2U5 , April

1971.

(c) Vehicle Reference Point . The "vehicle reference point" is the

location on the vehicle used to determine when the vehicle is at any of the

points on the vehicle path. The vehicle reference point shall be the front of

the vehicle unless such positif^in is more than l6 ft from the exhaust outlet,

in which case both the front of the vehicle and the exhaust outlet shall be

used as reference points.

10^2. Personnel . Persons selected to conduct noise measurement testing

or to measure noise level of vehicles operated on a highway shall have been

trained and qualified in the techniques of sound measurement and the operation

of sound measuring instruments.

10^43- Instrumentation . Equipment used in making vehicle noise

measurements shall be selected by technically trained personnel and shall meet

26
the following requirements:

(a) Sound Level Meter . The sound level meter shall meet the requirements

of MSI Standard S1.U-19T1 for Types 1, 2, or S2A.

(b) Sound Level Calibrator . The sound level calibrator shall calibrate

the entire sovmd level meter with an acoustic calibrator of the coupler-type.

(c) Tachometer . A calibrated engine speed tachometer shall be used to

determine when maximum rated rpm is attained in conducting the tests specified

in Section 10U6 of this code.

(d) Anemometer . An anemometer shall be used to measure the wind speed

at the test site when conducting tests specified in Section 10^6 of this code.

lOUU. Noise Measurement Sites . Noise measurement sites shall be

selected to meet location, ground condition, and roadway surface requirements

in the following subsections (a) and (b):

(a) Measurement Sites for Vehicles on the Highway .

(b) Measurement Sites for New Motor Vehicles . Sites for measuring noise

from new motor vehicles to determine compliance with Section 27l60 of the

Vehicle Code shall meet the following conditions:

(1) Location . The location shall be a flat open space free of

large vertical sound-reflecting s\irfaces such as signboards

buildings hillsides, or trees within 100 ft of the microphone and

within 100 ft of the centerline of the path of the vehicle from the

point where the throttle is opened to the point where the throttle

is closed.

(2) Ground Condition . The ground siorface between the

microphone and the path of the vehicle shall be asphalt or concrete

free of powdery snow, 1 o e soil, or ashes.

(3) Roadway Surface . The surface over which the vehicle

travels shall be dry and relatively smooth concrete or asphalt

pavement free of extraneous material.

lOi+5' Microphone and Personnel Positions . The microphone for the sound

level meter and the personnel involved in all types of vehicle noise

measurements shall be positioned as follows:

(a) Microphone Location . The microphone shall be located 50 + 1 ft from

the centerline of the lane of travel of the vehicle at a height of h +_ 1/2 ft

above the plane of the roadway surface.

(b) Microphone Orientation . The microphone shall be oriented in

relation to the source of the sound in accordance with the instrument

27
manufacturer's instructions. Where the instruction manual is vague or does

not include adequate information, a specific recommendation shall be obtained

from the manufacturer,

(c) Technician Location . The technician making direct readings of the

meter shall be positioned in relation to the microphone in accordance with the

instrument manufactiirer ' s instructions. Where the instruction manual is vague

or does not include adequate information, a specific recommendation shall be

obtained from the manufacturer.

(d) Bystander Location . During noise measurements, bystanders shall

remain at least 50 ft from the microphone and the vehicle being measured,

except for a witness or trainee, who may be positioned beyond the technician

on a line with the technician and the microphone.

10k6. Operation of New Motor Vehicles . New motor vehicles tested to

determine compliance with Section 27l60 of the Vehicle Code shall be operated

in conjunction with any aiixiliary equipment that would be in use while the

vehicle is operated on the highway, including but not limited to cement

mixers, refrigerator units, and garbage compactors.

(a) Heavy Trucks, Truck Tractors, and Buses .

(b) Light Trucks, Truck Tractors, Buses, and Passenger Cars .

(c) Motorcycles . The test procedure for motorcycles shall be as follows

(1) Test Area Layout . The test area layout for motorcycles

shall be the same as specified in subsection (b) (l) and Figure 3

for light trucks, truck tractors, buses, and passenger cars. (See

next page .

)

(2) Gear Selection . Motorcycles shall be operated in second

gear. Vehicles which reach maximuin rpm at less than 30 mph or before a point 25 ft bevond the microphone point shall be operated

in the next higher gear.

(3) Acceleration . The vehicle shall proceed along the test

path at a constant approach speed which corre ponds either to an engine speed of 60% of maximuin rpm or to 30 mph, whichever is lower.

When the vehicle reference point reaches the acceleration point, the

throttle shall be fully opened. The throttle shall be held open

until the rear of the vehicle is approximately 100 ft beyond the

microphone or until the maximum rpm is obtained, at which point the

throttle shall be gradually closed. Wheel slip shall be avoided

during this test.

(U) Engine Temperature . The engine temperature shall be

within normal operating range before each test run.

28
Test Area Layout . The test area shall include a vehicle path of

sufficient length for safe acceleration, deceleration, and stopping of the

vehicle. The vehicle pat>i (shovn with only one directional approach in Figure

3 for purposes of clarification) shall be marked vith the following zone and

points

(a) Microphone point - the location on the centerline of the

vehicle path that is closest to the microphone.

(B) Acceleration point - a location 25 ft before the microphone

point.

(C) End point - a location 100 ft beyond the microphone point.

^D) End zone - the last T5-ft distance between the niicrophone point

and the end point.

Figure 3. Test Area Layout for Light Trucks, Truck Tractors, Buses, Passenger

Cars and Motorcycles.

29
((i) Deceleration . Tests during deceleration shall be conducted when

deceleration noise appears excessive. The vehicle shall approach the end

point from the reverse direction a maximiuT! rpm in the same gear selected for

the tests during acceleration. At the end point, the throttle shall be closed

and the vehicle shall be allowed to decelerate to 1/2 of maximum rpm.

IOU7. Meter Operation . The sound level meter shall be operated in

accordance with the instrument manufacturer's instructions and 'as follows:

(a) Meter Setting . The A-weighting network and the fast meter response

shall be used.

(b) Calibration Check . An external calibration check shall be made

before and after each period of use and at intervals not exceeding 2 hr when

the instriiment is used longer than a 2-hr period.

(c) Meter Reading . The reading recorded shall be the highest sound

level obtained as the vehicle passes by, disregarding unrelated peaks due to

extraneous ambient noises.

(d) Ambient Sound . Measurements shall be made only when the A-weighted

ambient sound level, including wind effects, due t'^ all sources other than the

vehicle being measured, is at least 10 dB(A) lower than the soimd level of the

vehicle.

(e) Wind . Measurements shall be made only when the wind velocity is

less than 12 mph.

IOU8. Vehicle Noise Level . The measured noise level of a vehicle shall

be reported as follows:

(a) Vehicles on the Highway .

(b) New Motor Vehicles . The sound leve"" readings for determining

compliance of new motor vehicles with Section 2716O of the Vehicle Code shall

be obtained after sufficient preliminary runs to enable the test driver to

become familiar with the operation of the vehicle and to stabilize engine

operating conditions.

(1) At least four measurements shall be made from each side of

the vehicle. When the exhaust outlet is more than 16 ft from the

driver's position, at least two runs in each direction shall be

performed with each of the reference points described in Section

lOUl (c) of this code.

(2) The A-weighted sound level for each side of the vehicle

shall be the average of the two highest readings on that side which

are within 2 dB(A) of each other. The noise level reported for the

•

; vehicle shall be the sound level of the loudest side.

30
ISO RECO^MENDATION R362

17/ Measurement of Noise Emitted by Vehicles—

1. SCOPE

This ISO Recommendation describes methods of determining the noise emitted by motor vehicles, these being intended to meet the requirements of simphcity as far as is consistent with reproducibility of results and realism in the operating conditions of the vehicle.

2. GENERAL REQl'IREMENTS

2. 1 Test conditions

This ISO Recommendation is based primarily on a test with vehicles in motion, the ISO

reference test. It is generally recognized to be of primary importance that the measurements

should relate to normal town driving conditions, thus including transmission noise etc. Measurements should also relate to vehicle conditions which give the highest noise level consistent with normal driving and which lead to reproducible noise emission. Therefore, an acceleration test at full throttle from a stated running condition is specified.

Recognizing, however, that different practices already exist, specifications of two other methods used are also given in the Appendix. These relate to:

(a) a test with stationary vehicles (see Appendix Al) and

(b) a test with vehicles in motion, under vehicle conditions which (in the case of certain

vehicles) are different from those in the ISO reference test (see Appendix A2).

When either of these tests is used, the relation between the results and those obtained by

the ISO reference test should be established for typical examples of the model concerned.

2.2 Test site The test methods prescribed call for an acoustical environment which can only be obtained

in an extensive open space. Such conditions can usually be provided

for type-approval measurements of vehicles,

for measurements at the manufacturing stage, and

for measurements at official testing stations.

It is desirable that spot checking of vehicles on the road should be made in a similar acoustical environment. If measurements have to be carried out on the road in an acoustical environment which does not fulfil the requirements stated in this ISO Recommendation,

it should be recognized that the results obtained may deviate appreciably from the results obtained using the specified conditions.

2.3 Interpretation of results The results obtained by the methods specified give an objective measure of the noise emitted

under the prescribed conditions of test. Owing, however, to the fact that the subjective

appraisal of the annoyance or noisiness of different classes of motor vehicles is not simply

related to the indications of a sound level meter, it is recognized that the correct interpre- tation of results of the measurements in this ISO Recommendation may require different

limits tn hp set fnr the corrcstJondinc annoyance of different classes of vehicles.

This material is reproduced with permission from International

Organization for Standardization Recommendation 362-196^, Measurement

of Noise Emitted "by Vehicles, copyrighted by the American National

Standards Institute, 1U3O Broadway, New York, N. Y. IOOI8.
3. MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENT

A high quality sound level meter should be used. The weighting network and meter time constant employed should be curve " A " and " fast response " respectively, as specified in Recommendation No. 123 of the International Electrotechnical Commission for Sound Level Meters. A

detailed technical description of the instrument used should be supplied. Notes

1. The sound level measured using sound level meters having the microphone dose to the instrument

case may depend on the orientation of the instrument with resftect to the sound source, as well as on

the position of the observer making the measurement. The instructions given by the manufacturer

concerning the orientation of the sound level meter with respect to the sound source and the observer should therefore be carefully followed.

2. If a wind shield is used for the microphone, it should be remembered that this may have an influence on the sensitivity of the sound level meter.

3. To ensure accurate measurements, it is reconunended that before each series of measurements the amplification of the sound level meter be checked, using a standard noise source and adjusting as necessary.

4. It is recommended that the sound level meter and the standard noise source be calibrated periodically

at a laboratory equipped with the necessary facilities for free-field calibration. Any peak which is obviously out of character with the general sound level being read should be

ignored.

4. ACOUSTICAL ENVERONMENT

The test site should be such that hemispherical divergence exists to within ± 1 dB.

Note.—A suitable test site, which could be considered ideal for the purpose of the measurements, would

consist of an open space of some SO m radius, of which the central 20 m, for example, would consist of

concrete, asphalt or similar hard material.

In practice, departure from the so-called " ideal " conditions arises from four main causes:

(a) sound absorption by the surface of the ground;

(b) reflections from objects, such as buildings, and trees, or from persons;

(c) ground which is not level or of uniform slope over a sufficient area

(d) wind.

It is impracticable to specify in detail the effect produced by each of these influences. It is considered important, however, that the surface of the ground within the measurement area be free from powdery snow, long grass, loose soil or ashes. To minimise the effect of reflections, it is further recommended that the sum of the angles sub- tended at the position of the test vehicle by surrounding buildings within 50 m radius should not

exceed 90° and that there be no substantial obstructions within a radius of 25 m from the vehicle.

Acoustical focussing effects and sites between parallel walls should be avoided.

Wherever possible, the level of ambient noise (including wind noise and—for stationary tests

roller stand and tyre noise) should be such that the reading produced ou the meter is at least 10 dB below that produced by the test vehicle. In other cases, the prevailing noise level should be

stated in terms of the reading of the meter.

Note.—Care should be taken that gusts of wind do not distort the results of the measurements. The presence of bystanders may have an appreciable influence on the meter reading, if such

persons are in the vicinity of the vehicle or the microphone. No person other than the observer reading the meter should therefore remain in the neighbourhood of the vehicle or the microphone.

Note.—Suitable conditions exist, if bystanders are at a distance from the vehicle which is at least twice

the distance from vehicle to microphone.

32
5. MEASUREMENTS WITH VEHICLES IN MOTION

5.1 Testing ground

The testing ground should be substantially level, and its surface texture such that it does

not cause excessive tyre noise.

5.2 Measuring positions

The distance from the measuring positions to the reference line CC (Fig. 1) on the road

should be 7.5 m. The path of the centre line of the vehicle should follow as closely as possible the line CC. The microphone should be located 1.2 m above the ground level.

5.3 Number of measurements

At least two measurements should be made on each side of the vehicle as it passes the measuring positions.

Note.—It is recommended that preliminary measurements be made for the purpose of adjustment. Such preliminary measurements need not be included in the final result.

Microphone oo

7,5 m 7.5 m o Microphone

Fig. 1 . — Measuring positions for measurement with vehicles in motion

5.4 Test procedure

5.4.1 General conditions

The vehicle approaches the line AA in the appropriate conditions specified below: When the front of the vehicle reaches the position, in relation to the microphone,

shown as AA in Figure 1, the throttle is fully opened as rapidly as practicable and held

there until the rear of the vehicle reaches position BB in Figure 1 , when the throttle is closed as rapidly as possible.

Trailers, including the trailer portion of articulated vehicles, are ignored when considering the crossing of line BB.

Note.—If the vehicle is specially constructed with equipment (such as concrete mixers, compressors, pumps, etc.), which is used whilst the vehicle is in normal service on the road, this equipment should also be operating during the test.

33
.4.2 Particular conditions

5.4.2.1 Veh!cle with no gfak-box. The vehicle should approach the line AA at a steady

speed corresponding

either to an engine speed of three quarters of the speed at which the engine

develops its maximum power.

or to three quarters of the maximum engine speed permitted by the governor,

or to 50 km/h,

whichever is the lowest.

5.4.2.2 Vehicle with a manually operated gear-dox. If the vehicle is fitted with a two-,

three-, or four-speed gear box, the second gear should be used. If the vehicle has more than four speeds, the third gear should be used. Auxiliary step-up ratios

/ ("overdrive") should not be engaged. If the vehicle is fitted with an auxiliary

reduction gear box, this should be used with the drive allowing the highest vehicle speed.

The vehicle should approach the line AA at a steady speed corresponding

either to an engine speed of three quarters of the speed at which the engine

develops its maximum power,

or to three quarters of the engine speed permitted by the governor,

or to 50 km/h,

whichever is the lowest.

5.4.2.3 Vehicle with an automatic gear-box. The vehicle should approach the line A A

at a steady speed of 50 km/h or at three quarters of its maximum speed, whichever

is the lower. Where alternative forward drive positions are available, that position

which results in the highest mean acceleration of the vehicle between lines A A

and BB should be selected. The selector position which is used only for engine braking, parking or similar slow manoeuvres of the vehicle should be excluded.

5.4.2.4 Agricultural tractors, self-propelled agricultural machines and motor cultivators. The vehicle should approach the line AA at a steady speed of three quarters of the maximum speed which can be achieved, using the gear-box ratio which gives the highest road speed.

Statement of results

All readings taken on the sound level meter should be stated in the report. The basis of horsepower rating, if appropriate, should be stated in the report. The state of loading of the vehicle should also be specified in the report.

3U
A p p r N D I c n s

Al. Ml-ASl REMENTS \M U 1 S IA I IONAUV N KHK l.ES

A 1.1 Nleasuring positions

Measurements are made in each of the four main directions al a distance of 7.0 m from

the nearest surface of the vehicle. The actual positions used for the measurements arc shown in Figure 2. If measurements are required in more than the four measuring

positions shown in Figure 2. they should be taken from chosen positions on the circles shown — i.e. the circles v,ith radius 7.0 m.

The microphone should he located 1.2 m above the ground Ic\el.

A 1.2 Number of measurements

At least tv.0 measurements should he made in each measuring position.

AlJ \'ehicle condiiions

The engine of the vehicle without a speed governor should be run at three quarters of

the number of revolutions per minute at which, according to the manufacturer, it develops its maximum power. The engine speed, expressed in revolutions per minute,

is measured by means of an independent instrument, e.g. by the use of free-running

rollers and a tachometer. A governed engine should be run at maximum speed.

The engine should be brought to its usual working temperature before measurements

are carried out.

A 1.4 Statement of results

All the sound level readings observed in each measuring position should he slated in the report.

MOTORCYCLE WITH OR

WITHOUT SIDE-CAR CAR WITH OR WITHOUT

TRAILER

Fig. 2. — Measuring posilions for mcasun-incal with sltiiiniun vehicles
A2. MEASUREMENTS WITH VEHICLES IN MOTION (MODIHED METHOD)

A 2.1 Testing ground

The testing ground should be substantially level, and its surface texture such that it does not cause excessive tyre noise. A2.2 Measuring positions

The distance from the measuring positions to the reference line CC (Fig. 1) on the road should be 7.5 m. The path of the centre line of the vehicle should follow as closely as possible the line CC.

The microphone should be located 1.2 m above the ground level. A 2.3 Number of measurements At least two measurements should be made on each side of the vehicle as it passes the measuring positions. Note.—It is recommended that preliminary measurements be made for the purpose of adjust- ment. Such preliminary measurements need not be included in the final result. A 2.4 Test procedure

A2.4.I General conditions The vehicle approaches the line A A in the appropriate conditions specified below: When the front of the vehicle reaches the position, in relation to the microphone,

shown as AA in Figure 1, the throttle is fully opened as rapidly as practicable and

held there until the rear of the vehicle reaches position BB in Figure 1, when the

throttle is closed as rapidly as possible.

Trailers, including the trailer portion of articulated vehicles, are ignored when

considering the crossing of line BB.

Note.—If the vehicle is specially constructed with equipment (such as concrete mixers, compressors, pumps, etc.), which is used whilst the vehicle is in normal service on the road, this equipment should also be operating during the test.

A2.4.2 Particular condition.'! Vehicles should be driven in such a manner as to comply with either of the following

conditions:

A2.4.2.1 Vehicle with a manually operated gear box, with or without automatic- CLUTCH. The vehicle should approach the line A A (Fig. 1) at a steady speed

corresponding to three quarters of the revolutions per minute at which the engine (according to the manufacturer) develops its maximum power. The

gear ratio should be chosen such that the road speed most closely approaches

50 km/h at this engine speed. However, if the vehicle has more than three forward gears, the first gear should not be used.

A2.4.2.2 Vehicle with an automatic gear box. The vehicle should approach the line AA

at a steady speed of 50 km/h or at three quarters ofits maximum speed, whichever

is the lower. Where alternative forward drive positions are available, the position

which results in the highest sound level of the vehicle should be selected. The selector position which is used only for engine braking, parking or similar slow manoeuvres of the vehicle should be excluded. A 2.5 Statement of results All readings taken on the sound level meter should be stated in the report. The basis of horsepower rating, if appropriate, should be stated in the report. The state of loading of the vehicle should also be specified in the report.

36
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, FEDERAL HIGHWAY

ADMINISTRATION VEHICLE i:;rZ?:OR NOISE LEVELS

(Title U9, Code of Federal Reg-'xLations , Chapter III, SuDchapter 3,

Part 393. 9^+, 38 FR 3088O, Koverber 8, 1973)

Title hg — Transportation

CHAPTER III ~ FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADtmilSTRATION

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Subchapter B — Motor Carrier Safety Regulations

[Docket No. MC-22; Notice No. T3-2T]

PART 393 ~ PARTS AlTD ACCESSORIES NECESSARY FCR SAFE OPERATION

Vehicle Interior zrciss levels

393.9^ Vehicle interior noise levels

(a) Application of the rules in this section. This section applies to

all motor vehicles manufactured on and after October 1, 197^. On and after

April 1, 1975? this section applies to all motor vehicles manufactured before

October 1, 197^.

(b) General rule. The interior sound level at the driver's seating

position of a motor vehicle must not exceed 90 dB(A) vhen meas-jred in

accordance vith paragraph (c) of this section.

(c) Test procedure. (l) Park the vehicle at a location so that no large

reflecting surfaces, such as other vehicles, signboards, buildings, or hills,

are within 50 feet of the driver's seating position.

(2) Close all vehicle doors, vindcvs , and vents. I'^rn off all pcveroperated accessories.

(3) Place the driver in his normal seated position at the vehicle's

controls. &/acuate all occupants except the driver and the person conducting

the test.

{k) Use a sound level meter w ich meets the requirements of the American

National Standards Institute Standard ANSI Sl.li-1971 Specification for Sound

Level Meters, for Type 2 Meters. Set the meter to the A-veighting netvcrk,

"fast" meter response.

(5) Locate the microphone, oriented vertically upward, 6 inches to the

right of, in the same plane as, and directly in line with, the driver's right

ear

(6) With the vehicle's transmission in neutral gear, accelerate its
engine to either its maximum governed engine speed, if it is equipped with an engine governor, or its speed at its maximum rated horsepower, if it is not

equipped with an engine governor. Stabilize the engine at that speed.

(T) Observe the A-weighted sound level reading on the meter for this

stabilized engine speed condition. Record that reading, if the reading has

not been influenced by extraneous noise soxu'ces such as motor vehicles

operating on adjacent roadways.

(8) Return the vehicle's engine speed to idle and repeat the procedures

specified in paragraphs (c) (6) and (c) (T) of this section until two maximum

sound levels within 2 dB of each other are recorded. Numerically average

those two maximum sound level readings

(9) The average obtained in accordance with paragraph (c) (8) of this

section is the vehicle's interior sound level at the driver's seating position

for the purpose of determining whether the vehicle conforms to the rule in

paragraph (b) of this section. However, a 2 dB tolerance over the sound level

limitation specified in that paragraph is permitted to allow for variations in

test conditions and variations in the capabilities of meters.

. (FR Doc. 73- 23768 Filed 11-7-73 ;8:l+5 am)

38
11. Appendix C. Bus Noise Reduction: Domestic and Foreign

Historically, "buses have "been nuch more of a vay of life in Europe

than in the United States. In response to the market demand for city

"buses, European manufacturers have had the economic incentive to

incorporate the fairly major modifications necessary to achieve significant

noise reduction. Typical modifications include: (l) redesign of the rear

of the "bus body to accomodate more engine shielding, (2) use of electric

demand fans or viscous-coupled fans, (3) addition of engine enclosures, (h)

water cooled exhaust manifolds and (5) improved mufflers.

U. S. manufacturers have not had the same incentive due to the existence of the automo"bile as the primary mode of every day transportation.

BiLS designs have remained essentially sta"ble for the last 15-20 years —

the exception "being the recent introduction of the mini"bus concept of

transportation. Bus noise levels have "been reduced in order to meet stat,e

and local noise ordinances, "novever, fev, if any, man^afacturers have made

serious attempts to solve the design pro"blems that woiold "be necessary' for

substemtial noise reduction on existing bus models. They are reluctant to

redesign their existing b-'oses since there is a high probability that vithin

the next several years the overall design of buses will be significantly

changed from today's design as a direct result of the Transb^^is Program.

The Transbus Program is a demonstration project, sponsored by the U. S.

Department of Transportation, Urban Mass Transportation Administration

(UMTA), which has as its objective the development of a totally nev concept

bus design by 1977. Interior and exterior noise level considerations are included as major design parameters. Presently, MA General Corporation,

Rohr Industries (Flexible) and the Truck and Coach Di^'lsion of the General

Motors Corporation are designing and testing prototype buses 'onder t'ne direction of t"ne prime contractor — Booze Allen Applied Research. The

Rohr and A1<1 General protot^r'pe designs utilize diesel power plants while the

GfC design incorporates a gas turbine engine, riowever , all t'nree designs

can accomodate either type of power plant. Manufacturers are closely

monitoring the progress of this program with results to be made public

within the next several years.

12. References

[l] Code of Federal Reg^jlations , CFR 390.3, Federal Motor Carrier

Safety Regulations: Definitions, U. S. Government Printing Office,

Washington, D. C, October 1973, p. 232.

[2] Control of Noise from Motor "Vehicles, Report of the Task Force on Noise, June 197^, Illinois Institute for Environmental Quality,

Chicago, Illinois.

[3] Code of Federal Regulations , kg CFR 568.3, "Vehicles Manufactured in

Two or More Stages: Definitions, U. 3. Government Printing Office,

Washington, D. C, October 1973, p. 375-

39
[h] Aiken, T. , Federal Highway Statistics, Federal Highway Administration,

personnal communication, June 3, 1975.

[5] Warnix, J. L. and Sharp, B. H. , Cost Effectiveness Study of Major Sources

of Noise, Volume IV, Buses, Wyle Research Report WR 73-10 (Wyle Laboratories, El Segundo, California, April 197^)'

[6] Singh, J., Renner, R. A. and Saxton, J. G. , The Impact of . Noise Abatement

Standards upon the Bus Industry, IRT-3^6-R (international Research and

Technology Corporation, Arlington, Virginia, March 197^).

[7] A Study of Annoyance from Motor Vehicle Noise, Bolt Beranek and Newman,

Inc., Report No. 2112 (Bolt Beranek and Newman, Inc., Cambridge,

Massachusetts, June 1971)

[8] Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., J366b - Exterior Sound Level for

Heavy Trucks and Buses, SAE Recommended Practice (SAE, New York, New York

197^).

[9] Measurement of Noise Emitted by Vehicles, ISO Recommendation R362 (international Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 197^)-

[10] California A.drainistrative Code, Title 13, Chapter 2, Subchapter k.

Article 10, Vehicle Noise Measin-ement (Department of the California

Highway Patrol, California, December 1973).

[11] American Standard Specifications for Sound Level Meters, SLk-l^Ht

American National Standards Institute, New York, New York (April

1971).

[12] Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., JI8U - Qualifying a Sound Data

Acquisition System SAE Recommended Practice (SAE, Warrendale, Pennsylvania,

1970). .. .^ . .

, ,

.

[13] Recommendations for Sound Level Meters, lEC Publication 123 (international Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, Switzerland, 196l).

[ik] Recommendation for Precision Sound Level Meters, lEC Publication 179

(international Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, Switzerland, 1965).

[15] Recommendations for Octave, Half-Octave, and Third-Octave Band Filters

Intended for the Analysis of Sounds and Vibrations, lEC Publication

225 (international Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, Switzerland,

1966).

[16] American Standard Methods for the Measurement of Sound Pressure Levels,

SI. 13-1971 5 American National Standards Institute, New York, New York

(July 1971).

ho
[it] Transportation Noise and Noise from Equipment Powered by Internal

Combustion Engines, Report No. NTID 300.13, December 1971, U. S.

Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D. C.

[18] Staadt, R. L. , Truck Noise Control, SAE Report SP-386 (Society of

Automotive Engineers, New York, New York, 197^).

[19] Close, W. H. , Chief, Research Division, Office of Noise Abatement,

U. S. Department of Transportation, personnal communication, February

28, 197^.

[20] Landis, E. E. , International Harvester Company, private correspondence,

April 19, 197^+.
13. Bibliography

1. Transportation Noise and its Control, Department of Transportation

P 5630.1, June 1972, U. S. Department of Transportation, Washington,

D. C. (Available from the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C, Stock Number 500-0057).

2. Transit Bus Noise Control Feasibility Study, Submitted to- the Urban

Mass Transportation Administration under Contract IT-06-0022, (Washington

Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, Washington, D C, December 1972)

Available from National Technical Information Service, Springfield,

• Virginia, PB- 220-809.

3. Murray, W. S. and Swetnam, G. F., Feasibility Study of Noise Control

Modifications for an Urban Transit Bus, MTR 6272 Rev 2, The MITRE

Corporation, McLean, Virginia, January 1973- (Available from the National

Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia, PB-220-36i|)

k. Bullard, 0. J., The Determination of Practical Noise Control Retrofitting

of Pre-1970 Truck and Coach Models , submitted to the Department of

Transportation under Contract DOT-TCS-699, (GMC Truck and Coach Division,

Pontiac, Michigan, October 197^)-

5. Leasure, W. A. and Quindry, T. L. , Methodology and Supporting Documentation for the Measurement of Noise from Medium and Heavy Trucks , National

Bureau of Standards Internal Report 7^-517, U. S. Department of Commerce,

National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D. C, June 197^.

6. A Study of the Magnitude of Transportation Noise Generation and Potential

Abatement, submitted to the Department of Transportation, Office of Noise

Abatement under Contract No. DOT-OS-A9-018 , (Serendipity Incorporated,

. Arlington, Virginia, September I969).

USCOMM-NBS-DC

h2
NBS-lUA (REV. 7-73)

U.S. DEPT. OF COMM.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATA

SHEET

1. PUBLICATION OR REPORT NO.

NBSIR 75-771

2. Gov't Accession

No.

3. Recipient's Accession No.

4. TITLK AND SUBTITLE

An Evaluation and Assessment of Existing Data and Procedures

lor tne weasurement or iNoise rrom ouses

5. Publication Date September 1975

6. Performing Organization Code

7. AUTMOR(S) T> r? ^^ it a t t B. R. Fuller, W. A. Leasure, Jr.

8. Performing Organ. Report No. NBSIR 75-771

9. PERFORMINCi ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS

NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20234

10. Project/Task/Work Unit No. 2000451

11. Contract/Grant No.

12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Complete Address (Street, City, State, ZIP)

Office of Noise Abatement and Control

U. S. Environmental Protection AgencyWashington, D. C. 20U60

13. Type of Report & Period Covered

Final

1 4« Spon s orin^ Agency Clodc

15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES

16. ABSTRACT (A 200-word or less factual summary of most si^ificant information. If document includes a significant

bibliography or literature survey, mention it here.)

This report reviews existing bus noise measiirement procedures with

regard to their usefulness in the regulation of "bus noise as well as the

availahility, extent and applicability of existing data. On the basis

of this review, probable or potential measiirement difficulties are identified that could hinder the prom\ilgation and/or enforcement of futiare

EPA regulations to control the noise emission from buses.

17. KEY WORDS (six to twelve entries; alphabetical order; capitalize only the first letter of the first key word unless a proper name; separated by semicolons)

AcoTostics (sound); b\is ; measurement methodology; noise emission standard;

noise measurement.

18. AVAILABILITY [H Unlimited

[X] For Official Distribution. Do Not Release to NTIS

I I Order From Sup. of Doc, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402, SD Cat. No. C13

QJ Order From National Technical Information Service (NTIS)

Springfield, Virginia 22151

19. SECURITY CLASS

(THIS REPORT)

UNCL ASSIFIED

20. SECURITY CLASS

(THIS PAGE)

UNCLASSIFIED

21. NO. OF PAGES

So

22. Price

USCOMM.DC 29042-P74