alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>
    This schedule contains summmary financial information extracted from
Highlands Bankshares, Inc. Form 10Q and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         5,451
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         3,431
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               5,038
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                   0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   25,589
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         2,956
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           2,929
<LOANS>                                      173,649
<ALLOWANCE>                                   (1,459)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               228,584
<DEPOSITS>                                   197,551
<SHORT-TERM>                                   2,186
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            1,684
<LONG-TERM>                                    2,249
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       2,734
<OTHER-SE>                                    22,180
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               228,584
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                7,417
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                915
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 216
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               8,548
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             3,975
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4,043
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          4,505
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    220
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                3,210
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,622
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     1,039
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,039
<EPS-BASIC>                                     2.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   2.07
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                  4.41
<LOANS-NON>                                      184
<LOANS-PAST>                                     532
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               1,318
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    139
<RECOVERIES>                                      60
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              1,459
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           1,459
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            0




</TABLE>
#### § 932.8 Natural condition olives.

*Natural condition olives* means olives in their fresh harvested state, whether or not placed in a water or other preserving medium.

[33 FR 11266, Aug. 8, 1968]
#### SELLECK v. DIENSDORF.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 12, 1906.)

Action by Henry G. Selleck, Jr., against Katharine Diensdorf.

No opinion. Motion denied on conditions stated in order. Order filed.
Part 5646 - QUALITY ASSURANCE

Subpart 5646.7 - WARRANTIES

5646.706 Warranty Terms and Conditions.

Subpart 5646.7 - WARRANTIES

5646.706 Warranty Terms and Conditions.

Contracts containing a warranty clause will not be closed out before the warranty period has

expired.

HQ, United States Special Operations Command

Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L-K)

SOFARS 5646

February 2007
#### VILLAGE OF NORWICH, Respondent, v. BAKER, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

June 27, 1906.)

In the matter of the village of Norwich against Edward D. Baker.

No opinion. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.
#### § 986.20 To handle.

*To handle* means to receive, shell, crack, accumulate, warehouse, roast, pack, sell, consign, transport, export, or ship (except as a common or contract carrier of pecans owned by another person), or in any other way to put inshell or shelled pecans into any and all markets in the stream of commerce either within the area of production or from such area to any point outside thereof. The term “to handle” shall not include: sales and deliveries within the area of production by growers to handlers; grower warehousing; custom handling (except for selling, consigning or exporting) or other similar activities paid for on a fee-for-service basis by a grower who retains the ownership of the pecans; or transfers between handlers.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 3:06-cr-208-MEF

) 

JASON EDWARD COFIELD )

O R D E R

On March 15, 2007, the government filed an Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial

(Doc. # 62). While the granting of a continuance is left to the sound discretion of the trial

judge, United States v. Warren, 772 F.2d 827, 837 (11th Cir. 1985), the Court is, of course,

limited by the requirements of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161. The Speedy Trial Act

provides generally that the trial of a defendant in a criminal case shall commence within 70

days of the latter of the filing date of the indictment or the date the defendant appeared before

a judicial officer in such matter. 18 U.S.C. §3161(c)(1); see United States v. Vasser, 916

F.2d 624 (11th Cir. 1990).

The Act excludes from this 70 day period any continuance that the judge grants "on

the basis of his findings that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the

best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial." 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A).

The motion states that a continuance is necessary as the government's key witness will

be out of the district and unavailable for trial. Defense counsel indicated that there was no

opposition to a continuance. Consequently, the Court concludes that a continuance of this

case is warranted and that the ends of justice served by continuing this case outweighs the

Case 3:06-cr-00208-MEF-CSC Document 67 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. See United States v.

Davenport, 935 F.2d 1223, 1235 (11th Cir. 1991).

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. The government's motion filed on March 15, 2007 is GRANTED in part and

DENIED in part.

2. The trial of this case is continued until further order of the Court.

DONE this the 1st day of May, 2007.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cr-00208-MEF-CSC Document 67 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 2 of 2
Honorable R. M. Dixon Opinion No. WW-473

Board ofWater Engineers 1410 Lavaca Street Re: May an existing Water Austin, Texas Control and Improvement District change itsname, and related 'DearMr. Dixon: questions.

Your letter ofJune 18, 1958, requests our opinion on.,the,following: :,% "1. Does Art. 7880-16 authorize an existing

Water Control and Improvement District to change its name to aname more descriptive of the locale and principal powers tobe exercised so long as the word "district" appears in the new name? "2e If the answer to Question No. 1 is in the affirmative, does the Board ofWater Engineers have tineauthority to approve an application for such name change? "3. If the answer to Question No. 2 is in the affirmative, may the Board ofWater Engineers at its discretion establish the procedure and fees tobe paid by the applicant? "4. If the answer toQuestion No. 2 isnegative, what action isnecessary to change the name of an existing district?*Honorable .R.M. Dixon, page 2 (WW-473)

Article 7880-11, V.C.S. requires that thepetition for the organization of awater control and improvement district "shall designate the name of the district." Article 7880-16 prescribes thename which may be given such adistrict. There isno statute which either expressly orby implication authorizes the change of name of an existing district. The district may exercise only such powers ashave been expressly delegated to itby the Legislature, or which exist by clear and unquestioned implication. Tri-City Fresh Water Supply Dist. No. 2of Harris CoUnty v. Mann, Atty. Gen., 135 Tex. 280, 142 S.W. 2d 945 (1940).

Your first question is answered: No. Consequently, no answers toquestions 2and 3are necessary. Your fourth question is answered: There isno authority for the change of name of an existing district. SUMMARY There isno authorization for an existing Water Control and Improvement District to change its name,

Very truly yours, WILL WILSON APPROVED; OPINION COMMITTEE J. C. Davis, Jr., Chairman Marietta McGregor Payne Tom I.McFarling Jack Goodman Henry G. Braswell
REVIEWED FOR THEATTORNEY GENERAL By: W. V. Geppert Assistant
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN INSURANCE )

COMPANY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

CAROL THORN; JOLEEN LEEA COLON; ) Civil Action No. 2:06-CV-717-IDeM

DALE EUGENE KIRKINDOLL; )

ELIZABETH S. KIRKINDOLL; THOMAS )

HOLT KIRKINDOLL; JAMES W . GRIFFIN; )

SANDRA L. GRIFFIN; PATRICK A. BELT; )

CHRISTOPHER B. BELT; GENE )

STEGMAIER; ESTATE OF WILLIAM R. )

KLAUSS, a deceased minor; ESTATE OF )

CHERETY THORN, a deceased minor; )

LV STABLER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL; BRPT)

LAKE REHABILITATION CENTER; BUTLER)

COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL )

SERVICES; )

)

Defendants. )

ENTRY OF DEFAULT

It appearing that defendants James Griffin, Sandra Griffin, and Gene Stegmaier

were duly served with a copy of the summ ons and complaint on August 21, 2006, and 

defendant Patrick A Belt was duly served with a copy of the summ ons and complaint on

August 30, 2006, and said defendants have failed to answer or otherwise defend this action

as set out in the affidavit of plaintiff’s attorney filed herein on December 21, 2006, as required

by law.

The request for default as to BRPT Lake Rehabilitation and LV Stabler Memorial

Hospital is not entered due to questions regarding service as relayed to Plaintiff’s counsel.

DEFAULT is hereby entered against said defendants, James Griffin, Sandra Griffin,

Gene Stegm aier, and Patrick A Belt.

DONE THIS 5TH day of April , 2007.

/s/ Debra P. Hackett

 

DEBRA P. HACKETT

CLERK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 31 Filed 04/05/2007 Page 1 of 1
1344.302 Requirements.       The designee authorized to lower or raise the $25 million sales threshold for performing a review to determine if a contractor purchasing system review is needed is set forth in CAM 1301.70.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1344.3 - Contractors' Purchasing Systems Reviews
Case 1:06-cv-00708-CSC Document 13 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### § 930.24 Appointment.

The selection of nominees made pursuant to elections conducted under § 930.23(c) shall be submitted to the Secretary in a format which indicates the nominees by district, with the nominee receiving the highest number of votes at the top and the number of votes received being clearly indicated. The Secretary shall appoint from those nominees or from other qualified individuals, the grower and handler members of the Board and an alternate for each such member on the basis of the representation provided for in § 930.20 or as provided for in any reapportionment or reestablishment undertaken pursuant to § 930.21. The public member and alternate public member are nominated by the Board pursuant to § 930.23(d) and shall also be subject to appointment by the Secretary. The Secretary shall appoint from nominees by the Board or from other qualified individuals the public member and the alternate public member.
601.000 Scope of part.       This part describes the Department of State Acquisition Regulation (DOSAR) in terms of establishment, relationship to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), arrangement, applicability, and deviation procedures.    **Parent topic:** PART 601—DEPARTMENT OF STATE ACQUISITION REGULATIONS SYSTEM
Exhibit 4.01


 




	
  

  	
  COMMON
  INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR
  CERTAIN DEFINITIONS CUSIP 420877 20 1 THIS CERTIFIES THAT is the owner of
  FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK, $0.001 PAR VALUE,
  OF HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. (hereinafter, the “Corporation”) transferable
  on the books of the Corporation in person or by duly authorized attorney upon
  surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate and the
  shares represented hereby are issued and shall be held subject to all of the
  provisions of the Corporation’s Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, and
  By-laws, as amended. This Certificate is not valid until countersigned and
  registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar. WITNESS the facsimile seal of
  the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers.
  Dated: COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. TRANSFER AGENT
  AND REGISTRAR BY AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE HAY AMERICAN FINANCIAL PRINTING
  INCORPORATED – MINNEAPOLIS HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. DELAWARE CORPORATE SEAL
  1989 PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER VICE PRESIDENT-GENERAL COUNSEL AND
  CORPORATE SECRETARY
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6403

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

CALVIN ANTONIO SPENCER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Terrence W. 

Boyle, District Judge. (2:92-cr-00026-BO-1; 2:12-cv-00034-BO)

Submitted: October 31, 2013 Decided: November 6, 2013

Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Calvin Antonio Spencer, Appellant Pro Se. Kristine L. Fritz, 

Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorneys, 

Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

 Calvin Antonio Spencer appeals the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2013) 

motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. United States v. Spencer, Nos. 2:92-cr-00026-

BO-1; 2:12-cv-00034-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 7, 2013). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Subpart 315.2 - Solicitation and Receipt of Proposals and Information    **Parent topic:** PART 315 - CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION315.204-5 Part IV - Representations and instructions.       (c) *Section M, Evaluation factors for award.*          (1)  			The requiring activity shall develop technical evaluation factors and submit them to the contracting officer as part of the acquisition plan or other acquisition request documentation for inclusion in a solicitation. The requiring activity shall indicate the relative importance or weight of the evaluation factors based on the requirements of an individual acquisition.          (2) Only a formal amendment to a solicitation can change the evaluation factors.315.208 Submission, modification, revision, and withdrawal of proposals.       (b) In addition to the provision in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 52.215-1, Instructions to Offerors - Competitive Acquisition, if the head of the contracting activity (HCA) determines that biomedical or behavioral research and development (R&D) acquisitions are subject to conditions other than those specified in FAR 52.215-1(c)(3), the HCA may authorize for use in competitive solicitations for R&D, the provision at 352.215-70, Late Proposals and Revisions. This is an authorized FAR deviation.          (2) When the provision at 352.215-70 is included in the solicitation and if the HCA intends to consider a proposal or proposals received after the exact time specified for receipt, the contracting officer, with the assistance of cost or technical personnel as appropriate, shall determine in writing that the proposal(s) meets the requirements of the provision at 352.215-70.
Subpart 3022.1—Basic Labor Policies    **Parent topic:** PART 3022—APPLICATION OF LABOR LAWS TO GOVERNMENT ACQUISITIONS3022.101 Labor relations.3022.101-70 Admittance of union representatives to DHS installations.       (a) Admittance of union representatives to Transportation Security Administration or United States Secret Service installations and work sites is not governed by this rule, but by laws, rules, regulations, Executive Orders and policies applicable to those Components. It is the policy of DHS to admit non-employee labor union representatives of contractor employees to DHS installations to visit work sites and transact labor union business with contractors, their employees, and union stewards pursuant to existing union collective bargaining agreements. Their presence must not interfere with the contractor's work under a DHS contract nor violate safety or security regulations that may be applicable to persons visiting the installation. However, if there have been incidents of vandalism, illegal work stoppages, or interference with work, the non-employee labor union representatives may be subject to access limitations. Non-employee labor union representatives will not be permitted to conduct meetings, collect union dues, or make speeches concerning union matters while visiting a work site during working hours.          (b) Whenever a non-employee labor union representative is denied entry to a work site, the person denying entry shall make a written report to the DHS labor advisor and Component labor advisor, if any, within two working days after the request for entry is denied. The report shall include the reason(s) for the denial, the name of the representative denied entry, the union affiliation and number, and the name and title of the person that denied the entry.3022.101-71 Contract clauses.       (a) The contracting officer, may, when applicable, insert the clause at (HSAR) 48 CFR 3052.222–70, Strikes or Picketing Affecting Timely Completion of the Contract Work, in solicitations and contracts.          (b) The contracting officer may, when applicable, insert the clause at (HSAR) 48 CFR 3052.222–71, Strikes or Picketing Affecting Access to a DHS Facility, in solicitations and contracts.
#### § 906.59 Agents.

The Secretary may, by designation in writing, name any person, including any officer or employee of the United States, or name any agency in the United States Department of Agriculture, to act as his agent or representative in connection with any of the provisions of this subpart.
#### § 955.13 Fiscal period.

*Fiscal period* means the 12-month period beginning on September 16 and ending on September 15 of the next year or such other period that may be recommended by the committee and approved by the Secretary.
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 6 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 6 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 56 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 1 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 56 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 2 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 56 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 3 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 56 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 4 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 56 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 5 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 56 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 6 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 56 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 7 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 56 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 8 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 56 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 9 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 56 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 10 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 56 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 11 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 56 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 12 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 56 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 13 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 56 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 14 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 56 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 15 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 56-2 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 1 of 9
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 56-2 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 2 of 9
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 56-2 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 3 of 9
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 56-2 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 4 of 9
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 56-2 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 5 of 9
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 56-2 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 6 of 9
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 56-2 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 7 of 9
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 56-2 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 8 of 9
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 56-2 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 9 of 9
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 56-3 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 56-3 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 2 of 8
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 56-3 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 3 of 8
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 56-3 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 4 of 8
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 56-3 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 5 of 8
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 56-3 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 6 of 8
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 56-3 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 7 of 8
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 56-3 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 8 of 8
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 56-4 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 56-4 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 56-4 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 56-4 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 56-4 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 5 of 5
#### § 981.7 Edible kernel.

*Edible kernel* means a kernel, piece, or particle of almond kernel that is not inedible.

[41 FR 26852, June 30, 1976]
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3053 

To suspend temporarily the duty on synthetic elastic staple fiber. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. CARPER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on synthetic elastic staple 

fiber. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SYNTHETIC ELASTIC STAPLE FIBER. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.55.03 Synthetic elastic staple fiber of polyethylene terephthalate and 

polytrimethylene terephthalate, patented 

bi-component melt-spun elasterell-p (provided for in subheading 5503.20.00) ....... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


sroberts on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•S 3053 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
#### § 761.206 Pooling of unobligated funds allocated to State Offices.

The Agency periodically pools unobligated FO, CL, and OL loan funds that have been allocated to State Offices. When pooling these funds, the Agency places all unobligated funds in the appropriate National Office reserve. The pooled funds may be retained in the national reserve or reallocated to the States.

[72 FR 63285, Nov. 8, 2007, as amended at 75 FR 54013, Sept. 3, 2010]