alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUBCHAPTER G—CONTRACT

MANAGEMENT

PART 1642—CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION

PART 1643—CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS

PART 1644—SUBCONTRACTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

PART 1645—GOVERNMENT PROPERTY

PART 1646—QUALITY ASSURANCE

PART 1649—TERMINATION OF CONTRACTS

PART 1642—CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION

Subpart 1642.12—Novation and Change-of-Name Agreements

1642.1201 Definitions.

1642.1204 Agreement to recognize a successor in interest (novation agreement).

1642.1205 Agreement to recognize carrier's change of name.

Subpart 1642.70—Management Agreement (in Lieu of Novation Agreement)

1642.7001 Management agreement.

PART 1643—CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS

Subpart 1643.2—Changes

1643.205-70 Contract clause.

PART 1644—SUBCONTRACTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

Subpart 1644.1—General

1644.170 Policy for FEHB Program subcontracting.

Subpart 1644.2—Consent to Subcontracts

1644.270 FEHBP contract clause.

PART 1645—GOVERNMENT PROPERTY

Subpart 1645.3—Providing Equipment

1645.303-70 Contract clause.

PART 1646—QUALITY ASSURANCE

Subpart 1646.2—Contract Quality Requirements

1646.201 Contract Quality Policy.

Subpart 1646.3—Contract Clauses

1646.301 Contractor inspection requirements.

PART 1649—TERMINATION OF CONTRACTS

1649.002-70 Applicability of the FAR to FEHB acquisitions.

Subpart 1649.1—General Principles

1649.101-70 FEHBP renewal and withdrawal of approval clause.

1649.101-71 FEHBP termination for convenience clause.

1649.101-72 FEHBP termination for default clause.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-11-00672-CR

James Rogers, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 368TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 11-913-K368, HONORABLE LLOYD DOUGLAS SHAVER, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

A jury convicted James Rogers of the offenses of aggravated assault and unlawful

possession of a firearm by a felon and assessed his punishment at seventy-five years’ imprisonment

on each count. See Tex. Penal Code §§ 22.02, 46.04.

Rogers’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a

brief concluding that this appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements

of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the

record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio,

488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State,

516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972);

Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Counsel sent a copy of the brief to

Rogers and advised him of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. See
Anders, 386 U.S. at 744. Rogers requested and received two extensions of time to file his pro se

brief but did not file it.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Garner v. State,

300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim.

App. 2005). We agree with counsel that the appeal is frivolous, and her motion to withdraw is

granted. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

 

Jeff Rose, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin

Affirmed

Filed: June 26, 2013

Do Not Publish

2
2922.802 General.

Executive Order 11246, as amended, sets forth the Equal Opportunity clause and requires that the

Secretary of Labor promote full realization of equal opportunity for all persons regardless of race,

color, religion, sex, or national origin. No DOL contracting officer may contract for supplies or

services in a manner to avoid applicability of the requirements of E.O. 11246.

Parent topic: Subpart 2922.8 - Equal Employment Opportunity
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 19 - 00107 - CR SCOTTY D. JUSTICE, A PPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 137th District Court Lubbock County, Texas Trial Court No. 2010 - 427,049 (Counts I, II, & III) , Honorable John J. “ Trey

” McClendon III, Presiding 

### September 11 , 2019 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before CAMPBELL and PIRTLE and P ARKER , JJ. Appellant Scotty D. Justice appeals his convictio ns of two counts of aggravated sexual assault 1 and one count of aggravated assault . 2 The convictions were enhanced by prior felony convictions. The trial court s entenced a ppellant to seventy - five years’

1 T EX . P ENAL C ODE A NN . § 22.021 (West 2019 ).
2 T EX . P ENAL C ODE A NN . § 22.02 (West 2019 ).2

confinement for each count of aggravated sexual assault and to ninety - nine years’ confinement for aggravated assault . T he sentences ru n concurrently. The appellate record was originally due on May 28, 2019. The clerk’s record was filed by this date . However, the court reporter, Ms. Breann Hays , notified the court on May 28 that she was unable to complete the reporter’s record by the de adline due to her case load. Accordingly, w e granted Ms. Hays a thirty - day extension to file the reporter’s recor d. We subsequently granted her two more thirty - day extensions. By letter o f July 31 , 2019, we admonished Ms. Hays that no further extensions would be granted and that failure to file the reporter’s record by August 28 w ould result in the appeal being abated and the cause remanded to the trial court without further notice. On September 3, 2019 , Ms. Hays filed a fourth request for a thirty - day extension due to her case load. We deny the request, abate the appeal, and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings. T EX . R. A PP . P. 35.3(c) , 37.3 (a)(2)
. On remand, the trial court shall use whatever means it finds necessar y to determine the following: (1) what tasks remain to complete the filing of the reporter’s record ; (2) why Ms. Hays has not completed the necessary tasks ; (3) what amount of time is reasonably necessary for the completion of those tasks ; and (4) whether Ms. Hays can complete the tasks within the time the trial court finds reasonable. Should the trial court determine that Ms. Hays will require more than thirty days to complete, certify, and file the reporter’s record, it shall arrange for a substitute rep orter to do so. We further direct the trial court to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law3

addressing the foregoing subjects and any orders it finds necessary. T he trial court shall cause its findings, conclusions, and any orders to be included i n a supplemental clerk’s record to be filed with the clerk of this c ourt by October 11 , 2019 . If, before that date, Ms. Hays completes the filing of the reporter’s record, the trial court may report that fact to the clerk of this c ourt in lieu of a supple mental clerk’s record. It is so ordered. Per Curiam Do not publish.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v ) CR. NO. 3:06-CR-208-MEF

)

JASON EDWARD COFIELD )

ORDER

On November 27, 2006, the court held an evidentiary hearing on the motion to

suppress (doc. # 22) filed by the defendant. Following that hearing, the parties filed

briefs in support of their position. After review of the motion, the evidence and the briefs

of the parties, the court concludes that a supplemental hearing is necessary to address the

totality of circumstances relating to the seizure of the weapons and vehicles which form

the basis of the criminal charges against the defendant. Prior to this hearing, the court

will hold a conference call with counsel to address the precise issues about which the

court requires further evidence. At the supplemental hearing the court expects counsel to

secure the attendance of all witnesses who can testify about the issues which will be

discussed during the conference call. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED as follows:

1. That a supplemental hearing on the defendant’s motion to suppress be and

is hereby set on December 11, 2006, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 4B, United States

Courthouse Complex, One Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama. 

2. That a conference call be and is hereby set on December 1, 2006, at 8:30

Case 3:06-cr-00208-MEF-CSC Document 31 Filed 11/14/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

a.m. The United States shall set up the conference call with all counsel and the court.

Done this 14 day of November, 2006. th

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cr-00208-MEF-CSC Document 31 Filed 11/14/2006 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 25 Filed 11/27/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 25 Filed 11/27/2006 Page 2 of 2
648.201 Clauses for supply or service

contracts.

The authority to determine exemptions prescribed in FAR 48.201(a)(6) is delegated, without power

of redelegation, to the head of the contracting activity.

Parent topic: Subpart 648.2—Contract Clauses
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 16 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 1 of 42
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 16 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 2 of 42
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 16 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 3 of 42
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 16 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 4 of 42
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 16 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 5 of 42
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 16 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 6 of 42
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 16 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 7 of 42
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 16 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 8 of 42
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 16 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 9 of 42
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 16 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 10 of 42
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 16 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 11 of 42
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 16 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 12 of 42
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 16 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 13 of 42
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 16 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 14 of 42
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 16 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 15 of 42
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 16 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 16 of 42
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 16 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 17 of 42
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 16 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 18 of 42
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 16 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 19 of 42
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 16 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 20 of 42
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 16 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 21 of 42
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 16 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 22 of 42
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 16 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 23 of 42
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 16 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 24 of 42
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 16 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 25 of 42
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 16 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 26 of 42
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 16 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 27 of 42
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 16 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 28 of 42
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 16 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 29 of 42
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 16 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 30 of 42
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 16 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 31 of 42
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 16 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 32 of 42
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 16 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 33 of 42
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 16 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 34 of 42
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 16 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 35 of 42
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 16 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 36 of 42
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 16 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 37 of 42
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 16 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 38 of 42
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 16 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 39 of 42
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 16 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 40 of 42
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 16 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 41 of 42
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 16 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 42 of 42
#### Hospital for Joint Diseases et al., Respondents, v Travelers Property Casualty Insurance Company et al., Appellants.

Submitted August 27, 2007;

decided September 6, 2007

Reported below, 34 AD3d 532.

Motion by New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance Company et al. for leave to appear amici curiae on the appeal herein granted only to the extent that the proposed brief is accepted as filed.
#### § 917.66 Agents.

The Secretary may by a designation in writing name any person, including any officer or employee of the Government or any agency or Division in the United States Department of Agriculture, to act as his agent or representative in connection with any of the provisions of this part.

###### Effective Date Note

#### Effective Date Note:

At 76 FR 66605, Oct. 27, 2011, § 917.66 was suspended indefinitely, effective Oct. 28, 2011.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 21 (Thursday, January 31, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 6813]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-02156]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 10:00 a.m.-11:00 a.m.

PLACE: Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, 
Maryland.

STATUS: Commission Meeting--Open to the Public .

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    Briefing Matter: Sections 1112/1118 Requirements for Third Party 
Conformity Assessment Bodies.
    A live Webcast of the Meeting can be viewed at www.cpsc.gov/webcast. For a recorded message containing the latest agenda 
information, call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: January 28, 2013.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-02156 Filed 1-29-13; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                       |   |                                                                                   |
|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                       |   |                                                                                   |   |
| Date:                  September                  19, 2007 | By:    | /s/ Dong                Jinqing                                                   |   |
|                                                       |   | Dong                  Jinqing                                                          |   |
|                                                       |   | Chief                  Executive Officer, and                  Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                                                       |   |                                                                                   |   |
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1046 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1046

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 28, 2006.
    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a two-thirds 
vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the same day it is 
presented to the House is waived with respect to any resolution reported on the 
legislative day of September 28, 2006, providing for consideration or 
disposition of any of the following measures:
            (1) A bill to authorize trial by military commission for violations 
        of the law of war, and for other purposes.
            (2) A bill to update the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 
        1978.
            (3) A conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 5441) making 
        appropriations for the Department of Homeland Security for the fiscal 
        year ending September 30, 2007, and for other purposes.
    Sec. 2. House Resolutions 654 and 767 are laid upon the table.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
# 2426.7001-2426.7002 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**Subpart 2426.70 - Minority Business Enterprises
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

BRIAN BONNER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 3:06cv715-MHT

) 

NORINCO a/k/a CHINA NORTH )

INDUSTRIES CORP., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED as follows:

(1) The joint motion to strike jury demand (Doc. No.

104) is granted.

(2) The jury demand is struck.

(3) This case shall proceed nonjury.

DONE, this the 28th day of August, 2008.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 105 Filed 08/28/2008 Page 1 of 1
2910.002 Procedures.

(a) In accordance with FAR 6.302-1(c), purchase descriptions must not specify a product, or specific

feature of a product, peculiar to a manufacturer unless they are justified to the contracting officer in

writing by the office initiating the purchase request. The justification must state that the product, or

specific product feature, is essential to the Government's requirements and other similar products or

features will not meet these requirements. This determination must be signed by a representative of

the office originating the request and must accompany the purchase requisition submitted to the

appropriate contracting office. If such a justification is not made, the contracting officer may assume

that another make and model or a generic product could equally meet the DOL requirement.

(b) In accordance with FAR 10.002(b), the requisitioning office must submit to the contracting

officer information demonstrating that a variety of products from various commercial sources have

been considered. This requirement is not necessary for required sources (See FAR 8.001). Orders to

be placed against non-mandatory sources, such as the Federal Supply Schedules, or other

Governmentwide Acquisition Contracts, should include product information concerning multiple

sources based on research from www.contractdirectory.gov site or other sources. When documented

in this manner, the contracting officer may rely on this information in developing a procurement

strategy, or for documenting the comparison of catalogs or pricelists.

Parent topic: PART 2910 - MARKET RESEARCH
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 1,
2011 of Insteel Industries, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
    /s/ Michael C. GazmarianMichael C. GazmarianVice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
§ 1050.103 Definitions. ( a ) *Employee* means— ( 1 ) An employee of DOE or FERC as defined by 5 U.S.C. 2105 (employees of DOE contractors are specifically excluded);
( 2 ) A special Government employee as defined in 18 U.S.C. 202(a), and an expert or consultant who is under contract to the DOE pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 3109, including, in the case of an organization performing services under such section, any individual involved in the performance of such services;
( 3 ) A member of a Uniformed Service or an employee of another Government agency assigned or detailed to the DOE or FERC;
( 4 ) The spouse of an individual described in paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(3) of this section (unless such individual and his or her spouse are legally separated) or a dependent (within the meaning ot section 152 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954) of such an individual, other than a spouse or dependent who is an employee under paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(3).
( b ) *Foreign government* means: ( 1 ) Any unit of foreign governmental authority, including any foreign national, State, local, or municipal government;
( 2 ) Any international or multinational organization whose membership is composed of any unit of foreign government described in paragraph (b)(1); and
( 3 ) Any agent or representative of any such unit or such organization, while acting as such.
( c ) *Gift* means a tangible or intangible present (other than a decoration) tendered by, or received from, a foreign government.
( d ) *Decoration* means an order, device, medal, badge, insignia, emblem, or award tendered by, or received from, a foreign government.
( e ) *Minimal value* means that value as defined in regulations prescribed by the Administrator of General Services, in consultation with the Secretary of State, to reflect changes in the consumer price index for the immediately preceding 3-year period in accordance with the definition of “minimal value” as set forth in the Federal Property Management Regulations of title 41 of the Code of Federal Regulations as applied to the Utilization, Donation, and Disposal of Foreign Gifts and Decorations.
( f ) *The Act* means the Foreign Gifts and Decorations Act, 5 U.S.C. 7342.
( g ) *Appropriate General Counsel* means either the DOE General Counsel when the employee involved is an employee of that portion of the DOE which excludes FERC, or the FERC General Counsel when the employee involved is an employee of FERC.
[45 FR 53972, Aug. 13, 1980, as amended at 59 FR 44896, Aug. 31, 1994]