alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2015220DE.01002002.xml

| 21.8.2015 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 220/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2015

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 220/20

---

Berichtigung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) Nr. 922/2014 der Kommission vom 25. August 2014 zur Genehmigung des Wirkstoffs Metaflumizon gemäß der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1107/2009 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates über das Inverkehrbringen von Pflanzenschutzmitteln und zur Änderung des Anhangs der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) Nr. 540/2011

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 252 vom 26. August 2014
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 252 vom 26. August 2014

Auf Seite 9, Anhang I, Spalte „Sonderbestimmungen“, Buchstabe b:

anstatt:

„das Risiko für Schnecken oder Regenwürmer fressende Vögel.“

muss es heißen:

„das Risiko für schnecken- oder regenwurmfressende Vögel.“

Auf Seite 10, Anhang II zur Änderung des Anhangs der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 540/2011, Teil B, Spalte „Sonderbestimmungen“, Buchstabe b:

anstatt:

„das Risiko für Schnecken oder Regenwürmer fressende Vögel.“

muss es heißen:

„das Risiko für schnecken- oder regenwurmfressende Vögel.“

---
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 200 9-0 819

DCN: SE01825A55

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS I NFORMATION

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
### -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

36 38 40 42


## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 09/08 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 08 Sep 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.44 N 77.04 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■


## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
#### ARBING, Respondent, v. GUTCHO, Appellant, et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

July 31, 1914.)

Action by Edna Pearl Arbing against Albert Gutcho and another.

No opinion. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
#### KOHN, Appellant, v. MEYER, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 15, 1906.)

Action by Eva Kohn against David Meyer.

No opinion. Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed, and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event; on the authority of Winter v. Friedman, 111 App. Div. 306, 97 N. Y. Supp. 733.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000763541
<NAME>                        PS PARTNERS V, LTD.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                             1
<CURRENCY>                                                           U.S.$

<S>                                                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                        6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                                  JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                   JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                          1
<CASH>                                                           3,255,000
<SECURITIES>                                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 3,255,000
<PP&E>                                                           1,555,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   (560,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                  35,184,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                              106,000
<BONDS>                                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                                              0
<COMMON>                                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                                      35,078,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                    35,184,000
<SALES>                                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                 2,517,000
<CGS>                                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       59,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                   133,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  2,325,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              2,325,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     2,325,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                                          14.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                        14.22


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Fred Parizot, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered on September 14, 1978, unanimously affirmed. Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. (See *Anders*v *California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Fein, Lupiano, Bloom and Carro, JJ.
2952.201-70 Contracting Officer's Technical Representative (COTR).       Insert the following clause into contracts requiring COTR representation under 2901.603.71:                                  *Contracting officer's technical representative (COTR)* May 2004                                  (a) Mr./Ms. (Name) of (Organization) (Room No.), (Building), (Address), (Area Code & Telephone No.), is hereby designated to act as contracting officer's technical representative (COTR) under this contract.                                  (b) The COTR is responsible, as applicable, for: receiving all deliverables; inspecting and accepting the supplies or services provided hereunder in accordance with the terms and conditions of this contract; providing direction to the contractor which clarifies the contract effort, fills in details or otherwise serves to accomplish the contractual scope of work; evaluating performance; and certifying all invoices/vouchers for acceptance of the supplies or services furnished for payment.                                  (c) The COTR does not have the authority to alter the contractor's obligations under the contract, and/or modify any of the expressed terms, conditions, specifications, or cost of the agreement. If, as a result of technical discussions, it is desirable to alter/change contractual obligations or the scope of work, the contracting officer must issue such changes.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2952.2 - Text of Provisions and Clauses
Subpart 903.1 - Safeguards

Parent topic: PART 903 - IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF

INTEREST

903.101 Standards of conduct.

903.101-3 Agency regulations.

Detailed rules applicable to the conduct of DOE employees are set forth in 10 CFR part 1010.

903.104-1 Definitions.

As used in this section and for the purposes of the post-employment restrictions at 48 CFR

3.104-2(b)(3) -

Deputy program manager means the individual within DOE who normally acts as the program

manager in the absence of the program manager, and does not mean an individual who occasionally

acts for the program manager or the deputy program manager.

Program manager means the individual within DOE who:

(1) Exercises authority on a day-to-day basis to manage an acquisition program -

(i) For a system attained through the acquisition process; and

(ii) With one or more contracts, at least one of which has a value exceeding $10,000,000; and

(2) Is generally the person at the lowest organizational level who has authority to make technical

and budgetary decisions on behalf of DOE.

System means a combination of elements that function together to produce the capabilities required

to fulfill a mission need, including, but not limited to hardware, equipment, software, or any

combination thereof.

903.104-7 Violations or possible violations.

(a) Except for Headquarters activities, the individual within DOE responsible for fulfilling the

requirements of 48 CFR 3.104-7(a)

(1) and (2), relative to contracting officer conclusions on the impact of a violation or possible

violation of subsections 27 (a), (b), (c) or (d) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act, shall be

the legal counsel assigned direct responsibility for providing legal advice to the contracting office
making the award or selecting the source. The legal counsel is the Chief Counsel for the Operations

Offices or the Federal Energy Technology Center; the Counsel, or the Chief Counsel, for the Support

Offices or the Naval Reactors Offices; the General Counsel for National Nuclear Security

Administration (NNSA), and the General Counsel for the Power Administrations. For Headquarters

activities, the individual designated to perform the responsibilities in 48 CFR 3.104-7(a)

(1) and (2) regarding questions of disclosure of proprietary or source selection information is the

Assistant General Counsel for Procurement and Financial Assistance. The designated individual for

other questions regarding 48 CFR 3.104-7(a)

(1) and (2) for Headquarters activities is the Agency Ethics Official (Designated Agency Ethics

Official).
#### In the Matter of Joseph S. Barbaro, as Commissioner of the Nassau County Department of Social Services, Appellant, v. George K. Wyman, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, et al., Respondents.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered March

18,19'68, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. We have not. reviewed the order of the same court dated May 3, 1968. No separate appeal therefrom was taken and, since it denied a motion for reargument (no new facts were presented), no appeal therefrom would lie. Brennan, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3179 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3179

  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain compounds of lanthanum, 
                    cerium, and terbium phosphates.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

  Mr. Bunning introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain compounds of lanthanum, 
                    cerium, and terbium phosphates.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN COMPOUNDS OF LANTHANUM, CERIUM, AND TERBIUM 
              PHOSPHATES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.10.03        Compounds, inorganic    Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           or organic, of rare-                                              31/2009          ''
                           earth metals, of                                                                    .
                           lanthanum, cerium,
                           and terbium
                           phosphates (provided
                           for in subheadings
                           2846.10.00 and
                           2846.90.80)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between William Yerks, Respondent, and Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation, Appellant.

Judgment entered November 20, 1968, dissolving an earlier stay of arbitration and directing the parties to proceed to arbitration, affirmed, with $30 costs and disbursements to the respondent. Whether there had been physical contact with an unknown vehicle at the time of the accident involving the claimant was a question of fact for the Trial Judge. The claimant and one Louis Collina, a disinterested witness, both testified unequivocally that there was physical contact between claimant’s automobile and another automobile which left the scene of the accident before it could be identified. The trial court found that claimant had sustained his burden of proving physical contact with another automobile. This finding is supported by substantial evidence and should not be disturbed on appeal. Concur—Eager, J. P., Capozzoli and Nunez, JJ.; McNally and Steuer, JJ., dissent in the following memorandum by Steuer, J.: We dissent. We believe Trial Term’s finding of contact between claimant’s automobile and the unidentified vehicle is not only against the weight of the credible evidence but that respondent did not sustain the burden of proof. The statement given by the eyewitness denies knowledge of such contact, and it is quite clear from his testimony that if there had been contact in the way that he testified, he could not have seen it. Furthermore, in all reports submitted on behalf of claimant no contact is asserted and the fact of contact is, at least inferentially, belied. The mere statement, though made under oath, that there was contact, does not sustain the finding.
# Subpart 1643.2—Changes

**Parent topic:**PART 1643—CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS

## 1643.205-70 Contract clause.

The clause set forth in section 1652.243–70 shall be inserted in all FEHB Program contracts.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3573 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3573

 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain men's footwear with coated 
                     or laminated textile fabrics.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 27, 2006

  Mr. Carper introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain men's footwear with coated 
                     or laminated textile fabrics.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN MEN'S FOOTWEAR WITH COATED OR LAMINATED TEXTILE 
              FABRICS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.64.05      Men's footwear,     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         except vulcanized                                                  31/2009
                         footwear and
                         footwear with
                         waterproof molded
                         bottoms,
                         including bottoms
                         comprising an
                         outer sole and
                         all or part of
                         the upper, valued
                         over $20/pair,
                         whose height from
                         the bottom of the
                         outer sole to the
                         top of the upper
                         does not exceed 8
                         inches, designed
                         to be worn in
                         lieu of, but not
                         over, other
                         footwear as a
                         protection
                         against water,
                         oil, grease or
                         chemicals or cold
                         or inclement
                         weather where
                         such protection
                         includes
                         protection
                         against water
                         that is imparted
                         by the use of a
                         coated or
                         laminated textile
                         fabric (provided
                         in subheading
                         6402.91.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
601.603-3 Appointment.

(a) General. There is no contracting officer authority conferred upon any DOS employee by virtue of

position. The Procurement Executive appoints all DOS contracting officers, in conformance with FAR

1.603–3, with the one exception as noted in paragraph (b) of this section. The contracting officer

shall retain the original copy of the Standard Form 1402, Certificate of Appointment, signed by the

Procurement Executive. Only qualified employees shall be appointed as contracting officers. A/OPE

is responsible for providing guidance and oversight in managing such appointments.

(b) Temporary warrants. The Chief of Mission is delegated the authority by the Procurement

Executive to issue temporary contracting officer warrants for periods up to 90 calendar days in

order to cover emergency, post-specific operational requirements (e.g., staffing gaps, medical

evacuations, extended leave, etc.). These temporary appointments shall be executed on the Standard

Form 1402, and a copy shall be furnished to A/OPE. The warrant shall contain both a dollar

limitation of no more than $100,000 and a specific time period (not to exceed 90 days) during which

the warrant is effective.

(c) Non-Federal employees. Only United States Government employees shall be appointed as

contracting officers. For acquisitions at $25,000 and below only, this includes locally employed staff

(i.e., Foreign Service Nationals and Third Country nationals). Personal services contractors are not

eligible for appointment as DOS contracting officers.

(d) Personal services agreements. Individuals who may sign personal services agreements (PSAs)

are limited to the following:

(1) The Human Resources Officer;

(2) The Human Resources/Financial Management Officer; or,

(3) The Management Officer or an American Foreign Service Officer designated to perform human

resource functions.

(e) Real property leases. The FAR and DOSAR do not apply to leases of real property. A contracting

officer certificate of appointment is not required. Authority to sign real property leases is as follows:

(1) Domestic real property leases. The General Services Administration has delegated domestic

leasing authority to the Department of State's Office of Real Property Management (A/OPR/RPM).

This delegation is accomplished on a case-by-case basis.

(2) Real property leases abroad. Authority to sign real property leases abroad is held by the

Director/Chief Operating Officer (DIR/COO) of the Bureau of Overseas Buildings Operations (OBO),

through the Secretary of State, under the Foreign Buildings Act of 1926, as amended (22 U.S.C. 292

et seq.). Leases at post may be executed by the General Services Officer or by other post

administrative personnel as authorized by OBO.

Parent topic: Subpart 601.6—Career Development, Contracting Authority, and Responsibilities
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3481 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3481

 To require the Government Accountability Office to submit a report to 
   Congress on the compliance of the Postal Service with procedural 
requirements in the closing of the postal sorting facility in Aberdeen, 
                 South Dakota, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 8, 2006

   Mr. Thune introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Government Accountability Office to submit a report to 
   Congress on the compliance of the Postal Service with procedural 
requirements in the closing of the postal sorting facility in Aberdeen, 
                 South Dakota, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPORT ON THE POSTAL SORTING FACILITY IN ABERDEEN, SOUTH 
              DAKOTA .

    (a) In General.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Government Accountability Office shall submit a report 
on the compliance of the Postal Service with procedural requirements in 
the closing of the postal sorting facility in Aberdeen, South Dakota 
to--
            (1) the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 
        Affairs of the Senate; and
            (2) the Committee on Government Reform of the House of 
        Representatives.
    (b) Contents.--The report submitted under subsection (a) shall 
include an evaluation of--
            (1) the compliance of the Postal Service with the 
        requirements of section 404(b) of title 39, United States Code, 
        (or any other statutory or regulatory requirement) with respect 
        to the closing of the postal sorting facility in Aberdeen, 
        South Dakota; and
            (2) changed circumstances that have occurred at the postal 
        sorting facility in Aberdeen, South Dakota since February 1993 
        (the date on which the Government Accountability Office 
        submitted a report to the Senate on that faclility) that may 
        impact a reconsideration of the determination to close that 
        facility.
    (c) Operation of the Postal Sorting Facility.--During the period 
from the date of enactment of this Act through the date occurring 60 
days after the date of the submission of the report required by this 
Act, the Postal Service may not take any action to close the postal 
sorting facility in Aberdeen, South Dakota.
                                 <all>
```