alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

PR 22-0005 

JUN 2 8 2022 

IN RE THE MOTION OF LUKASZ I. WOZNIAK 

FOR ADMISSION TO THE BAR OF THE STATE 

OF MONTANA 

Bovv, -.() iwood 

Clerk of Supreme Court 

State of Montana 

ORDER 

Lukasz I. Wozniak has filed a motion for admission to the Bar of the State of 

Montana pursuant to Rule V of the Rules for Admission, Admission on Motion. The Bar 

Admissions Administrator of the State Bar of Montana has informed the Court that the 

Commission on Character and Fitness has certified that Wozniak has provided the 

necessary documentation and has satisfied the requirements prerequisite to admission on 

motion under Rule V. Therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon payment of any application fees and 

completion of any other processing requirements as set forth by the Bar Admissions 

Administrator, Lukasz I. Wozniak may be sworn in to the practice of law in the State of 

Montana. Arrangements for swearing in may be made by contacting the office of the Clerk 

of the Montana Supreme Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to Petitioner and to the State 

B ar of Montana. 

DATED this day of June, 2022. 

Chief Justice 

06/28/2022

Case Number: PR 22-0005
L_.4•JJ,,1-5xc 

Justices
Case 2:06-mc-03333-WKW Document 1 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-mc-03333-WKW Document 1 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-mc-03333-WKW Document 1 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 3 of 3
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3379 

To suspend temporarily the duty on formulations of NOA 446510. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 6, 2006 

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on formulations of NOA 

446510. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FORMULATIONS OF NOA 446510. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.11.05 Formulations of NOA 

446510 which include NOA 

446510 Technical, 2-(4- 

chloro-phenyl)-N-[2-(3- 

methoxy-4-prop-2-ynyloxyphenyl)ethyl]-2-prop-2- 

ynyloxyacetamide (CAS No. 

374726–62–2) (provided for 

in subheading 3808.20.15) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•S 3379 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
PART ll, ITEM 6, EXHIBIT II.

                               EGAN SYSTEMS, INC.
                          COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER SHARE

Computation of net loss per share:

The following data show the amounts used in computing net loss per share and the
effect on net loss and the weighted average number of shares of dilutive
potential common stock.

                                                     Three Months Ended
                                                         March 31,
                                                     ------------------
                                                    2002            2001
                                                    ----            ----

Net loss available to common stockholders      $    (22,362)   $    (80,064)
                                               ============    ============

Weighted average number of common shares in
 primary EPS                                     19,646,652      19,646,652

Effect of dilutive securities                            --              --
                                               ------------    ------------

Weighted average number of common shares and
 dilutive potential common stock used in
 fully diluted EPS                               19,646,652      19,646,652
                                               ============    ============

Net loss per common share:

 Basic and fully diluted                       $     (0.001)   $     (0.004)
                                               ============    ============

For 2002 and 2001, the effect of dilutive securities were not included in
computing fully diluted EPS because their effects are anti-dilutive.

                                       9
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-30227

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CARLOS HURTADO-VALOIS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:10-CR-40-2

Before KING, JOLLY, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Carlos Hurtado-Valois has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Hurtado-Valois has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Hurtado-Valois’s

response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 20, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-30227 Document: 00511893979 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/20/2012
No. 11-30227

The record does reveal a clerical error in the judgment with respect to the

statute of conviction cited for count five. The judgment should be corrected to

reflect that Hurtado-Valois was convicted of illegal entry in violation of 8 U.S.C.

§ 1325. See FED. R. CRIM. P. 36.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel

is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. This matter is REMANDED for correction

of the clerical error pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36.

2

Case: 11-30227 Document: 00511893979 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/20/2012
§ 987.101 Lot. *Lot* means the aggregate quantity of dates of the same variety, style, type and grade in like containers with like identification either ( a ) packed as a continuous production segment, or
( b ) offered for inspection as a shipping, storage, or other unit.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

OWEN J. ROGAL, D.D.S., )

P.C. d/b/a THE PAIN CENTER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 3:06cv728-MHT

) 

SKILSTAF, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion to withdraw (doc. no.

4) is granted.

DONE, this the 20th day of September, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 21 Filed 09/20/2006 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA OF

NORTHERN DIVISION

MAY'S DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, )

INC., individually and as class )

representative of all those gasoline )

station owners similarly situated, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-702-MEF

)

TOTAL CONTAINMENT, INC., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Doc. #21) filed on

August 29, 2006, it is hereby ORDERED that the defendants file its response which shall

include a brief and any evidentiary materials on or before September 14, 2006. The

plaintiff may file a reply brief on or before September 21, 2006.

DONE this the 30th day of August, 2006.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 31 Filed 08/30/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### AUDITORIUM CO. v. SAM S. SHUBERT BOOKING AGENCY.

(No. 6013.)

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 26, 1914.)

Appeal from Special Term, New York County. Action by the Auditorium Company against the Sam S. Shubert Booking Agency. From an order setting aside a verdict and ordering a new trial, on the ground that the verdict was contrary to the evidence and to the weight of the evidence, plaintiff appeals. Reversed, and verdict reinstated.

Louis Sturcke, of New York City, for appellant.

William Klein, of New York City, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We think there was a question of fact for the jury as to whether this contract was made in New York, which would give the court jurisdiction; and that question having been submitted to the jury, and the jury having decided it in favor of the plaintiff, the verdict was sustained by the evidence. The order appealed from should therefore be reversed, with costs, and the verdict reinstated.

SCOTT and DOWLING, JJ., dissent
This submission is without oral argument. Should the court determine that oral 1

argument is necessary, a hearing will be scheduled. If the nonmoving party fails to

respond, a final judgment may be entered without further notice or trial. See Fed. R. Civ.

P. 56(e). The moving party's evidence may be accepted as true if it is not

contradicted by the opposing party. Id. The contradiction must be supported by

evidence which may include, but is not limited to, affidavits and depositions. Any

evidence, and in particular deposition testimony, must be cited to with specificity and

particularity. Id. If deposition testimony is submitted and relied upon, the parties shall

direct the court to specific testimony which either does or does not "set forth specific

facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial." Id. Summary judgment may be

granted for either party if the evidence filed with the court shows that there is no material

question of fact and that a party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Fed. R.

Civ. P. 56.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

STEVE ADAMS, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

 ) CIVIL ACTION 2:06cv707-ID

v. )

 )

MERCHANTS FOOD SERVICES, )

 )

 Defendant. )

ORDER

Before the court is a motion for summary judgment, filed by defendant on June 28,

2007. (Doc. No. 9.) The plaintiff is DIRECTED to file a response to said motion on or

before July 17, 2007. The defendant may file a reply, if desired, on or before July 27,

2007. Thereafter, the defendant's motion for summary judgment, and all pleadings and

evidence filed in support of or in opposition to said motion, shall be DEEMED submitted

to the court.1

Case 2:06-cv-00707-ID-CSC Document 12 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

Pleadings submitted beyond the submission date will not be considered by the

court absent compelling exigent circumstances.

CONSIDERED and ORDERED this 2nd day of July, 2007.

 /s/ Ira DeMent 

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00707-ID-CSC Document 12 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 2 of 2
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

KENNETH BARBER

, *

* No. 19

- 607 V

Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran

*

v. * Filed: May 25, 2021

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Stipulation; Tetanus Diphtheria

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * acellular pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccine;

* pneumococcal conjugate (“PCV”)

* vaccine; Guillain

- Barré Syndrome

Respondent. * (“GBS”).

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Diana L. Stadelnikas , Maglio Christopher and Toale, PA, Sarasota, FL, for

Petitioner;

Jennifer L. Reynaud

, United States Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for

Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION 1

On May 24

, 20 21 , the parties filed a joint stipulation concerning the petition

for compensation filed by Kenneth Barber on April 24, 2019. P etitioner alleged

that the tetanus

- diphtheria

- acellular pertussis (“Tdap”) and pneumococcal

conjugate (PCV”) vaccines he receive d on February 21, 2018, which are contained

in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C .F.R. §100.3(a), caused him to

suffer Guillain

- Barré syndrome . P etitioner further alleges that he suffered the

residual effects of this injury for more than six mon ths. Petitioner represents that

there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on his

behalf as a result of his condition.

1 T he E

- Government Act

, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and

Promotion of Electronic Government Services) , requires that the Court post this decision on its

website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing

redaction of medical information or other information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 12(d)(4).

Any redactions ordered by the special master will appear in the document posted on the website.2

Respondent denies that petitioner’s alleged GBS and residual effects were

caused

- in

- fact by the Tdap or PCV vaccine; and denies that the Tdap and/or PCV

vaccine caused petitioner any other injury or his current condition.

Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto. The

undersigned finds said stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the

Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Damages awarded in that stipulation include:

A lump sum payment of $62,500.00 in the form of a check payable to

petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that

would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 15(a).

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC, Appendix B,

the clerk is directed to enter judgment according to this decision and the attached

stipulation. 2

IT IS SO ORDERED

.

s /Christian J. Moran

Christian J. Moran

Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each

party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal

Claims judge.
# 335.072 Key personnel.

If the contracting officer determines that the personnel to be assigned to perform effort on an R&D contract are critical to the success of the R&D effort, or were a critical factor in the award of the contract, then the contracting officer should consider using the key personnel clause at 352.237-75, Key Personnel.   

**Parent topic:**PART 335 - RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

WILLIAM D. BOWDEN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv665-WHA

)

MISSION PETROLEUM CARRIERS, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

RULE 26(f) ORDER

The parties are hereby reminded of the obligation, imposed by Rule 26(f) of the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure, to confer and to develop a proposed discovery plan. The Rule 26(f)

report containing the discovery plan shall be filed as soon as practicable but not later than

August 9, 2006.

The longstanding practice in this district is that dispositive motions shall be filed no later

than 90 days prior to the pretrial date. If the parties seek to vary from that schedule, they should

present, in the plan, specific case related reasons for the requested variance. 

This case will be set for trial before the undersigned judge during one of that judge's

regularly scheduled civil trial terms. The pretrial date is normally set within four to six weeks of

a scheduled trial term. The dates of commencement of this judge's next two available civil trial

terms are as follows: July 9, 2007 and December 10, 2007. This case will be set for one of

these terms, and suggested deadlines should be made accordingly.

Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 3 Filed 07/27/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

The court may or may not hold a scheduling conference before issuing a scheduling

order. If the court holds a scheduling conference, counsel may participate in the scheduling

conference by conference call.

The scheduling order entered by the court will follow the form of the Uniform

Scheduling Order adopted by the judges of this court. The Uniform Scheduling Order is

available on the court's website, www.almd.uscourts.gov in the Civil Case Information section. 

The report of the parties should comply with Form 35 of the Appendix of Forms to the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

DONE this 27th day of July, 2006.

/s/ W. Harold Albritton 

W. HAROLD ALBRITTON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 3 Filed 07/27/2006 Page 2 of 2
SUBCHAPTER A—GENERAL

PART 700 [RESERVED]

PART 701—FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION SYSTEM

PART 702—DEFINITIONS OF WORDS AND TERMS

PART 703—IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF

INTEREST

PART 704—ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS

PART 700 [RESERVED]

PART 701—FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION SYSTEM

Subpart 701.1—Purpose, Authority, Issuance

701.106 OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act.

Subpart 701.3—U.S. Agency for International Development Acquisition Regulation

701.301 Policy.

701.303 Publication and codification.

Subpart 701.4—Deviations from the FAR or AIDAR

701.402 Policy.

701.470 Procedure.

Subpart 701.6—Career Development, Contracting Authority, and Responsibilities

701.601 General.

701.602-1 Authority of contracting officers in resolving audit recommendations.

701.602-3 Ratification of unauthorized commitments.

701.603 Selection, appointment, and termination of appointment of contracting

officers.

701.603-70 Designation of contracting officers.

Subpart 701.7—Determinations and Findings

701.704 Content.

701.707 Signatory authority.

PART 702—DEFINITIONS OF WORDS AND TERMS

Subpart 702.170—Definitions

702.170-1 Definitions.

Subpart 702.270—Definitions Clause

702.270-1 Definitions clause.

PART 703—IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Subpart 703.1—Safeguards

703.104-4 Disclosure, protection, and marking of contractor bid or proposal

information and source selection information.

703.104-7 Violations or possible violations.

PART 704—ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS

Subpart 704.4—Safeguarding Classified Information Within Industry

704.404 Contract clauses.

Subpart 704.5 xxx

Subpart 704.8—Contract Files [Reserved]

Subpart 704.21 xxx

Subpart 704.70—Partner Vetting

704.7001 Scope of subpart.

704.7002 Definitions.

704.7003 Policy.
704.7004 Procedures.

704.7004-1 Preaward requirements.

704.7004-2 Post award requirements.

704.7004-3 Subcontracts.

704.7005 Solicitation provision and contract clause.
COURTROOM DEPUTY MINUTES DATE : SEPTEMBER 25, 2006

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA DIGITAL RECORDED: 1:26 p. m. to 1:27 p.m.

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE 

PRESIDING MAG. JUDGE: CHARLES S. COODY DEPUTY CLERK: WANDA STINSON 

CASE NUMBER: 2:06CR206-MHT-CSC DEFENDANT NAME: ALETHIA A. SCOTT

 

APPEARANCES

GOVERNMENT DEFENDANT

ATTY. CHRISTOPHER SNYDER ATTY. DONNIE BETHEL

/ DISCOVERY STATUS: Complete.

_________________________________________________________________________________________

 _________________________________________________________________________________________

/ PENDING MOTION STATUS: None.

/ PLEA STATUS: Possible Plea

__________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________

/ TRIAL STATUS: Will take 2 days to try cases, if goes to trial.

_________________________________________________________________________________________

 REMARKS:

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

Case 2:06-cr-00206-MHT-CSC Document 35 Filed 09/25/2006 Page 1 of 1
3003.1004 Contract clauses.       (a) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at (HSAR) 48 CFR 3052.203–70, Instructions for Contractor Disclosure of Violations, in solicitations and contracts containing the clause at (FAR) 48 CFR 52.203–13.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 3003.10—Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 3, 2010
of Insteel Industries, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
    /s/ H. O. Woltz IIIH. O. Woltz IIIPresident, Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board
#### § 987.11 Trade demand.

*Trade demand* means those quantities of marketable dates which the Committee finds are required to satisfy the need for dates in specific outlets in which marketable dates are handled.

[43 FR 4250, Feb. 1, 1978]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) Case No.: 2:06-mj-075-DRB

 )

RONALD MCQUEEN )

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

COMES NOW the undersigned counsel, Donnie W. Bethel, and enters his appearance

on behalf of Defendant, Ronald McQueen, in the above-styled case.

Dated this 2 day of August 2006. nd

Respectfully submitted, 

s/ Donnie W. Bethel

DONNIE W. BETHEL

Assistant Federal Defender

201 Monroe Street, Suite 407

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Phone: (334) 834-2099

Fax: (334) 834-0353

E-mail:don_bethel@fd.org

IN Bar Code: 14773-49

Case 2:06-cr-00198-WKW-CSC Document 9 Filed 08/02/2006 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) Case No.: 2:06-mj-075-DRB

 )

RONALD MCQUEEN )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 2 , 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk

of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following:

Tommie Brown Hardwick, Assistant U. S. Attorney, One Court Square, Suite 201, Montgomery, 

Alabama 36104. 

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Donnie W. Bethel

DONNIE W. BETHEL

Assistant Federal Defender

201 Monroe Street, Suite 407

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Phone: (334) 834-2099

Fax: (334) 834-0353

E-mail:don_bethel@fd.org

IN Bar Code: 14773-49

Case 2:06-cr-00198-WKW-CSC Document 9 Filed 08/02/2006 Page 2 of 2