alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUBCHAPTER F—SPECIAL CATEGORIES OF

CONTRACTING

PART 3035—RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING

PART 3036—CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS

PART 3037—SERVICE CONTRACTING

PART 3038—FEDERAL SUPPLY SCHEDULE CONTRACTING [RESERVED]

PART 3039—ACQUISITION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY [RESERVED]

PART 3040 [RESERVED]

PART 3041—ACQUISITION OF UTILITY SERVICES [RESERVED]

PART 3035—RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING

Subpart 3035.000—Scope of Part

3035.003 Policy.

3035.008 Evaluation for award.

3035.017 Federally Funded Research and Development Centers.

Subpart 3035.70—Information Dissemination by Educational Institutions

3035.70-1 Policy.

3035.70-2 Contract clause.

PART 3036—CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS

Subpart 3036.1—General

3036.104 Policy.

3036.104-90 Authority for one-step turn-key design-build contracting for the

United States Coast Guard (USCG).

Subpart 3036.2—Special Aspects of Contracting for Construction [Reserved]

Subpart 3036.5—Contract Clauses

3036.570 Special precautions for work at operating airports.

PART 3037—SERVICE CONTRACTING

Subpart 3037.1—Service Contracts—General

3037.103 [Reserved]

3037.104 Personal services contracts.

3037.104-70 Personal service contracts.

3037.104-90 Personal services contracts (USCG).

3037.104-91 Personal services contracts with individuals under the authority of 10

U.S.C. 1091 (USCG).

PART 3038—FEDERAL SUPPLY SCHEDULE CONTRACTING [RESERVED]

PART 3039—ACQUISITION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY [RESERVED]

PART 3040 [RESERVED]

PART 3041—ACQUISITION OF UTILITY SERVICES [RESERVED]
159 So.2d 286

#### Robert J. BOYLE, Sr., individually and on behalf of his minor son, Robert J. Boyle, Jr. v. TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 47030.

Jan. 20, 1964.

In re: Travelers Insurance Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Calcasieu. 157 So.2d 471.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal there is no error of law in its judgment.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

BARBARA JEFFERS and )

JOAN CRAIG, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 3:06-cv-685-WKW

)

RUSSELL COUNTY BOARD OF )

EDUCATION, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

This case is before the court on the Joint Motion to Amend Scheduling Order (Doc. # 26).

It is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. The court’s previous Amended Uniform Scheduling

Order is amended as follows:

1. The motions deadline as referenced in Section 2 is extended from December 10, 2007,

to December 15, 2007.

2. The settlement conference deadline as referenced in Section 3 is extended from

December 31, 2008, to January 11, 2008.

3. The discovery deadline as referenced in Section 7 is extended from October 1, 2007,

to November 15, 2007.

DONE this 15th day of October, 2007.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 27 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### § 948.35 Research and development.

The committee, with the approval of the Secretary, may provide for the establishment of marketing research and development projects designed to assist, improve, or promote the marketing, distribution, and consumption of potatoes and may make available committee information and data to any person, or to any employee of an agency or its agent, authorized by the committee as its agent with the approval of the Secretary, to conduct such projects.
MINUTES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN, DIVISION

SUSAN RUSS WALKER, U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE, PRESIDING

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA

DATE COMMENCED: February 9, 2007 9:00 a.m.

DATE COMPLETED: February 9, 2007 9:02 a.m.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA *

vs * 3:06cr204-MEF

HENRY ERIK YAPIAS *

__________________________________________________________________________________________

GOVERNMENT APPEARANCES: DEFENDANT

Christopher Snyder * Sydney Smith

*

____________________________________________ *____________________________________________

COURT OFFICIALS PRESENT:

Joyce Taylor, Courtroom Deputy Scott Wright, USPO

Risa Entrekin, Court Reporter

PROCEEDINGS:

HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PSYCHIATRIC EXAM (DOC #31)

9:00 a.m. Court convenes.

Court statements regarding motion for psychiatric examination.

Mr. Smith wants defendant admitted for evaluation.

Government has no objections and agrees with Mr. Smith.

Court states there is no dispute and order will be entered committing defendant for

evaluation.

9:02 a.m. Court recessed.

Case 3:06-cr-00204-MEF-CSC Document 38 Filed 02/09/2007 Page 1 of 1
www.socialsecurity.gov

Sekirite Sosyal ak Sant Pou Sèvis Medicare ak 

Medicaid yo ap travay ansanm pou fè ou jwenn 

èd siplemantè pou frè preparasyon medikaman ou 

Pou detèmine si ou ka elijib pou èd siplemantè sa a, 

Sekirite Sosyal ap bezwen konnen revni ou ak kantite 

lajan ou genyen nan kontdepay ou, kantite lajan ou 

genyen nan envestisman ou ak byen imobilye ou 

(ki pa kay ou). Si revni ak resous ou pa anpil, ou ka 

an mezi pou jwenn Èd pou peye prim asirans ou yo 

pa mwa, franchiz asirans ou chak ane ak kopeman 

preskripsyon nan nouvo pwogram Medicare a pou ede 

peye medikaman k ap kòmanse premye janvye 2006.

Lè ou ranpli yon fòmilè Application for Help with 

Medicare Prescription Drug Plan Costs—Aplikasyon 

pou jwenn èd nan plan Medicaare a pou peye 

medikaman (Fòmilè SSA-1020), sa ap ede Sekirite 

Sosyal detèmine si ou elijib pou sa. Youn nan kesyon 

ki sou fòm aplikasyon an konsène valè nominal ak 

valè racha kontra asirans-vi yo.

Ki diferans ki genyen ant valè nominal 

ak valè racha?

Nan Kesyon 5 lan, Sekirite Sosyal bezwen 

konnen si ou menm (ak Madanm/Maari ou, si n ap viv 

ansanm) gen kontra asirans-vi ki gen yon valè nominal 

total ki pi plis pase $1,500. Valè nominal la se menm 

bagay ak prestasyon desè–kantite lajan asirans la 

peye lè ou mouri. Si ou reponn “Wi” pou Kesyon 5 

la, ou dwe rapòte valè racha a–ki se kantite lajan ou 

ka resevwa si kontra asirans ou te konvèti an lajan 

kach kounye a–menm si li pi piti pase valè nominal la. 

Remak enpòtan: Si ou gen yon lajan prete sou kontra 

asirans lan, valè racha a diminye.

Sekirite Sosyal ap aksepte etadkont ou konsènan 

valè racha kontra asirans-vi ou epi li p ap mande 

okenn lòt dokiman.

Èske se tout kontra ki konsidere?

Non. Nan detèminasyon si valè nominal total 

(prestasyon desè) tout kontra asirans-vi ki depase 

$1,500, Sekirite Sosyal p ap konsidere:

• Asirans tanporè ki pa gen yon valè racha; oswa

• Asirans antèman lè prestasyon desè ka itilize 

sèlman pou fè depans antèman.

Èske konpayi asirans yo ap an mezi 

pou ede?

Wi. Konpayi asirans yo ap resevwa enfòmasyon sou 

nouvo pwogram preparasyon medikaman Medicare epi 

y ap fè yo konnen yo ka resevwa demanm valè racha 

nan men moun ki asire yo oswa nan men moun ki ede 

yo ranpli fòmilè aplikasyon pou èd siplemantè sa a.

Si ou pa konnen kantite lajan valè racha kontra 

asirans ou, ou ka bezwen kontakte ajan oswa konpayi 

asirans-vi ou pou ou ka jwenn enfòmasyon sa a.

Kouman ou ka jwenn plis enfòmasyon

Pou plis enfòmasyon konsènan èd siplemantè pou 

peye medikaman ou, rele Sekirite Sosyal nan nimewo 

sa a 1-800-772-1213 (TTY 1-800-325-0778) oswa 

vizite wèbsayt www.socialsecurity.gov.

Pou jwenn plis enfòmasyon sou plan Medicare pou 

ede peye medikaman, rele nan 1-800-MEDICARE

(1-800-633-4227) oswa vizite www.medicare.gov. 

Fason pou Jwenn Èd pou Peman Medikaman sou Preskripsyon Medicare

Asirans-Vi Valè Nominal ak Valè Racha

Social Security Administration

SSA Publication No. 05-10108-HC

Getting Help With Medicare Prescription Drug Plan Costs

 Life Insurance: Face And Cash Values (Haitian-Creole)

March 2006
§ 1040.5 Designation of responsible employee. ( a ) *Designation of responsible employee.* Each recipient shall designate at least one employee to coordinate its efforts to carry outs its responsibilities under this part. The recipient shall publish the name, office address and telephone number of the employee or employees appointed under this paragraph.
( b ) A recipient shall display prominently, in reasonable numbers and places, posters which state that the recipient operates a program or activity subject to the nondiscrimination provisions of applicable subparts, summarize those requirements, note availability of information regarding this part from the recipient and DOE, and explain briefly the procedures for filing a complaint. Information on requirements of this part, complaint procedures and the rights of beneficiaries are to be included in handbooks, manuals, pamphlets, and other materials which are ordinarily distributed to the public to describe the federally assisted programs or activities and the requirements for participation by recipients and beneficiaries. To the extent that recipients are required by law or regulation to publish or broadcast information in the news media, the recipient shall insure that such publications and broadcasts state that the program or activity in question is an equal opportunity program or activity or otherwise indicate that discrimination in the program is prohibited by Federal law.
( c ) Where a significant number or proportion of the population eligible to be served or likely to be directly affected by a federally assisted program or activity requires service or information in a language other than English in order to be informed of or to participate in the program, the recipient shall take reasonable steps, considering the scope of the program and size and concentration of such population, to provide information in appropriate languages (including braille) to such persons. This requirement applies to written material of the type which is ordinarily distributed to the public. The Department may require a recipient to take additional steps to carry out the intent of this subsection.
[45 FR 40515, June 13, 1980, as amended at 68 FR 51346, Aug. 26, 2003]
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 5 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 1 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 5 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 2 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 5 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 3 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 5 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 4 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 5 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 5 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 5 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 6 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 5 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 7 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 5 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 8 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 5 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 9 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 5 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 10 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 5 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 11 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 5 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 12 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 5 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 13 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 5 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 14 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 5 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 15 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 5 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 16 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 5 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 17 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 5 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 18 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 5 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 19 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 5 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 20 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 5 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 21 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 5 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 22 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 5 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 23 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 5 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 24 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 5 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 25 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 5 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 26 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 5 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 27 of 28
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 5 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 28 of 28
Subpart 1645.3—Providing Equipment

Parent topic: PART 1645—GOVERNMENT PROPERTY

1645.303-70 Contract clause.

The clause set forth in section 1652.245–70 shall be inserted in all FEHB Program contracts.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2014275EN.01000701.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 17.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 275/7 |

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision 2014/415/CFSP of 24 June 2014 on the arrangements for the implementation by the Union of the solidarity clause

(
[Official Journal of the European Union L 192 of 1 July 2014](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2014_192_R_TOC)
)

On the cover, in the table of contents:

for:

‘
Council Decision 2014/415/CFSP of 24 June 2014 on the arrangements for theimplementation by the Union of the solidarity clause
’

,

read:

‘2014/415/EU

Council Decision of 24 June 2014 on the arrangements for the implementation bythe Union of the solidarity clause
’

;

on page 53, in the title:

for:

‘COUNCIL DECISION 2014/415/CFSP

of 24 June 2014

on the arrangements for the implementation by the Union of the solidarity clause’

,

read:

‘COUNCIL DECISION

of 24 June 2014

on the arrangements for the implementation by the Union of the solidarity clause

(2014/415/EU)’

.

---
#### PEOPLE, Respondent, v. DINSER, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 25, 1906.)

Proceedings by the people of the state of New York against Gustave Dinser.

No opinion. Motion denied on defendant’s stipulating as stated in memorandum. Settle order on notice. See 98 N. Y. Supp. 314.
APPENDIX E 

FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS OF COUNTIES, CITIES, TOWNS, AND VILLAGES 

LOCAL FISCAL DATA DEFINITIONS 

MULTIPIERS 

TAX ESTIMATION METHOD 

TRANSFER PAYMENTS AND UNEMPLOYMENT IN ONEIDA AND 

MADISON COUNTIES
H. Res. 142

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

May 10, 2005.

Whereas Rotary International, founded on February 23,

1905, in Chicago, Illinois, is the world’s first service club

and one of the largest nonprofit service organizations;

Whereas there are more than 1.2 million Rotary International club members comprised of professional and

business leaders in more than 31,000 clubs in more than

165 countries;

Whereas the Rotary International motto, ‘‘Service Above

Self’’, inspires members to provide humanitarian service,

meet high ethical standards, and promote international

good will;

Whereas Rotary International funds club projects and sponsors volunteers with community expertise to provide medical supplies, health care, clean water, food production,

job training, and education to millions in need, particularly in developing countries;

Whereas in 1985, Rotary International launched Polio Plus

and spearheaded efforts with the World Health Organization, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the

United Nations Children’s Fund (‘‘UNICEF’’) to immunize the children of the world against polio;
2

•HRES 142 EH

Whereas polio cases have dropped by 99 percent since 1988,

and the world now stands on the threshold of eradicating

the disease;

Whereas Rotary International is the largest privately-funded

source of international scholarships in the world and promotes international understanding through scholarships,

exchange programs, and humanitarian grants;

Whereas since 1947, more than 35,000 students from 110

countries have studied abroad as Rotary Ambassadorial

Scholars;

Whereas Rotary International’s Group Study Exchange program has helped more than 46,000 young professionals

explore career fields in other countries;

Whereas 8,000 secondary school students each year experience life in another country through Rotary International’s Youth Exchange Program;

Whereas over the past five years, members throughout all

fifty States of Rotary International have hosted participants in Open World, a program sponsored by the Library of Congress, and therefore have earned the honor

of serving as Open World’s most outstanding host;

Whereas there are approximately 400,000 Rotary International club members in more than 7,700 clubs throughout the United States sponsoring service projects to address critical issues such as poverty, health, hunger, illiteracy, and the environment in their local communities

and abroad; and

Whereas February 23, 2005, would be an appropriate date to

observe Rotary International Day: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—
3

•HRES 142 EH

(1) supports the goals and ideals of a ‘‘Rotary

International Day’’ to celebrate the centennial anniversary of Rotary International; and

(2) recognizes Rotary International for 100 years of

service to improving the human condition in communities

throughout the world.

Attest:

Clerk.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000761236
<NAME>                        NATIONAL PROPERTIES INVESTMENT TRUST

       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              12/31/97
<PERIOD-START>                                 1/1/97
<PERIOD-END>                                   9/30/97
<CASH>                                         14,492
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  22,121
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               61,294
<PP&E>                                      1,700,025
<DEPRECIATION>                                693,692
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              1,067,627
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          63,467
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                 11,791,866
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                1,067,627
<SALES>                                       268,323
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              268,323
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 182,268
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               74,643
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             43,187
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                11,943
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            11,943
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   11,943
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.02
        


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

CLIFFORD ALSTON, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 3:06-cv-722-WKW

)

CHRISTOPHER ASKEW, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of Mark S. Carter’s Motion to Withdraw as Counsel (Doc. #8) filed on

October 23, 2006, it is hereby 

ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED.

DONE this day 24th of October, 2006.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00722-WKW-TFM Document 9 Filed 10/24/2006 Page 1 of 1
Subpart 728.1—Bonds    **Parent topic:** PART 728—BONDS AND INSURANCE728.105-1 Advance payment bonds.       (a) Generally, advance payment bonds will not be required in connection with USAID contracts containing an advance payment provision. In lieu thereof, contracting officers will follow procedures set forth in (48 CFR) FAR 32.409–3.          (b) Whenever a contracting officer considers that an advance payment bond is necessary, the contracting officer will:          (1) Establish a bond penalty that will adequately protect interests of the Government;          (2) Use the USAID Advance Payment Bond format;          (3) Place bond with a surety currently approved by the U.S. Treasury Department according to the latest Treasury Department Circular 570; and          (4) Stipulate that the cost of the bond shall not exceed a rate of $7.50 per $1,000 per annum based on the penalty of the bond, without the prior written approval of the Bureau for Management, Office of Acquisition and Assistance, Policy Division (M/OAA/P).          (c) Where the surety's obligation under an advance payment bond covers all advances made to the contractor during the term of the contract, no release should be issued to the surety until all advances made and to be made under the contract have been fully liquidated in accordance with the provisions of the contract, such as no-pay vouchers, reports of expenditures, or by refund. Where the surety's obligation under the bond is limited to advances made during a specified period of time, no release should be issued to the surety until all advances made and to be made during the specified period have been liquidated as aforesaid.
#### Shelia A. Gallaher et al., Appellants, v. Albert J. Bencene, Respondent.

Appeal held, decision reserved and matter remitted to Niagara County Family Court for further proceedings in accordance with the memorandum herein. Memorandum: Family Court awarded custody of the children to the father “ for a temporary period of 120 days-under Court, supervision and subject to the further orders of this Court” and stated that it “retains exclusive jurisdiction over this matter to enter any further final or modifying order in respect of the custody ”, We construe this decision to mean that the court granted the father temporary or probationary custody for this limited period and at the expiration of that time would hold a further hearing to examine and evaluate the welfare and experiences of the children during this period before making a final disposition as to custody. This period expired on December 22, 1966 and a further hearing should be had forthwith to examine fully the situation as it exists at this time. The order provided that the court would assign a child welfare caseworker in South Carolina, in the city of the residence of the father, “ to supervise said children’s adjustment ” in the father’s home. A report from this caseworker should be made to the court as a part of the new hearing. In addition to the examination of the parties the court should further interrogate the children as to their experience in the father’s home and elicit their wishes as to the place in which they would prefer to live. While the opinion of such young children should not be conclusive, it may well be a factor in the court’s determination. Any report of any social or welfare agency, as well as the interview with the children, should be made available to both parties, unless by stipulation the parties waive the receipt of such matters *(Kesseler*v. *Kesseler,*10 N Y 2d 445). Once the court has made a determination after this directed new hearing, the matter should be remitted to this court. Both parties may submit supplementary briefs and make further argument upon the calendar date of the matter in this court, after which we will make our decision. (Appeal from order of Niagara Family Court modifying custody provisions of Connecticut divorce decree.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Del Vecchio and Marsh, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Arnold Abel, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered November 28, 1977, convicting him of attempted *877robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. By order dated April 16,1979, this court remitted the case to the County Court to hear and report on defendant’s application to withdraw his plea of guilty and the appeal has been held in abeyance in the interim *(People v Abel,*69 AD2d 866). The County Court has complied and furnished its report. Judgment affirmed. No opinion. Damiani, J. P., Lazer, Rabin and O’Connor, JJ., concur.