alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

JAMES KUCZMASKI, etc., )

et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv731-MHT

) 

US FOODSERVICE, )

)

Defendant. )

 RULE 26(F) ORDER

The parties are reminded of the obligation, imposed

by Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to

confer and to develop a proposed discovery plan.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Rule 26(f) report

containing the discovery plan shall be filed as soon as

practicable but not later than October 19, 2006.

The longstanding practice in this district is that

dispositive motions shall be filed no later than 90 days

prior to the pretrial date. If the parties seek to vary

Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 15 Filed 09/28/2006 Page 1 of 3
2

from that schedule, they should present, in the plan,

specific case-related reasons for the requested variance.

In their Rule 26(f) report, however, the parties should

assume that the 90-day requirement will apply.

This case will be set for trial before the

undersigned judge during one of that judge's regularly

scheduled civil trial terms, within 7 to 10 months of

this order if a term is available and, if not available,

then as soon as possible thereafter. The pretrial date

is normally set within four to six weeks of a scheduled

trial term. The dates of each judge's civil trial terms

are available on the court's website located at

<http://almd.uscourts.gov> in the civil case information

section.

The court may or may not hold a scheduling conference

before issuing a scheduling order. If the court holds a

scheduling conference, counsel may participate in the

scheduling conference by conference call.

Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 15 Filed 09/28/2006 Page 2 of 3
The scheduling order entered by the court will follow

the form of the Uniform Scheduling Order adopted by the

judges of this court. The Uniform Scheduling Order is

also available on the court's website.

The report of the parties should comply with Form 35

of the Appendix of Forms to the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

DONE, this the 28th day of September, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 15 Filed 09/28/2006 Page 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                   5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Partnership's unaudited financial statements for the quarter ended June 30, 1999
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 Sep-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                      Jun-30-1999
<CASH>                                  1,831
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        1,831
<PP&E>                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          1,836
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      40
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                              1,796
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            1,836
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        1,040
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             261
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           60
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         18
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           701
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       701
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                              701
<EPS-BASIC>                           18.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                           18.27


</TABLE>
#### § 987.20 Part and subpart.

*Part* means the order regulating the handling of domestic dates produced or packed in Riverside County, Calif., and all rules, regulations, and supplementary orders issued thereunder. The aforesaid order shall be a *subpart* of such part.

[36 FR 15037, Aug. 12, 1971]
6069.2 

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

BEN F. BEARD, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS, 

INC., d/b/a LEHMAN CAPITAL, 

PETER R. KERN, OAK ASSET 

MANAGEMENT, LLC, MIDLAND 

LOAN SERVICES, INC., JOLLY 

ROGER LLC, JOLLY ROGER 1, INC., 

CAPITAL SEVEN RECOVERY LLC, 

PETER FAHEY, LARRY W. 

CARLSON, 

 Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 

2:06-CV-653-WHA 

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Notice is hereby given that Capital Seven Recovery LLC, Jolly Roger I, Inc. n/k/a 

Jolly Roger LLC; Peter Fahey, and Larry Carlson, defendants in the above named case, hereby 

appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit from an order striking 

defendants’ counsel’s signature on Notice of Removal as a Rule 11 Sanction and remanding case 

to state court, which was entered in this action on the 15th day of September, 2006. 

Respectfully submitted, 

_/s/ Deanna L. Weidner______________________ 

David B. Anderson (AND006) 

Ryan K. Cochran (COC020) 

Deanna L. Weidner (WEI038) 

Attorneys for Capital Seven Recovery LLC, Jolly 

Roger I, Inc. n/k/a Jolly Roger LLC; Peter Fahey, 

and Larry Carlson 

Case 2:06-cv-00653-WHA-CSC Document 28 Filed 10/12/2006 Page 1 of 2
6069.2 2

OF COUNSEL: 

WALLER, LANSDEN, DORTCH & DAVIS, LLP 

AmSouth-Harbert Plaza, Suite 1400 

1901 6th Avenue North 

Birmingham, AL 35203 

Phone: 205-214-6380 

Fax: 205-214-8787 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 12th day of October, 2006, I electronically filed the 

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send electronic 

notification of such filing to the following: 

Lee R. Benton, Esq. 

C. Steven Ball, Esq. 

Benton & Centeno, LLP 

2019 Third Avenue North 

Birmingham, AL 35203 

Richard H. Gill 

J. David Martin 

Copeland Franco Screws & Gill, PA 

PO Box 347 

Montgomery, AL 36101-0347 

Terry L. Butts, Esq. 

PO Drawer 272 

Luverne, AL 36049 

Michael E. Jones, Esq. 

Jones & Coots, LLC 

PO Box 367 

Luverne, AL 36049 

_/s/ Deanna L. Weidner______________________ 

OF COUNSEL 

 

Case 2:06-cv-00653-WHA-CSC Document 28 Filed 10/12/2006 Page 2 of 2
§ 1009.3 Policy. ( a ) The Department's price or charge for materials and services sold to persons and organizations outside the Federal Government shall be the Government's full cost for those materials and services, unless otherwise provided in this part.
( b ) Exceptions from the Department pricing and charging policy may be authorized in accordance with the following provisions: ( 1 ) Prices and charges for byproduct material sold pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 2111 and 2112 *et seq.* shall be either the full cost recovery price or the commercial price, whichever is higher, except that lower prices and charges may be established by the Department if it is determined that such lower prices and charges ( i ) will provide reasonable compensation to the Government for such material,
( ii ) will not discourage the use of or the development of sources of supply independent of the DOE of such material, and
( iii ) will encourage research and development. In individual cases, if (ii) and (iii) cannot be equally accommodated, greater weight will be given to encouragement of research and development.
( 2 ) Prices and charges for materials and services sold pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 2201 shall be either the full cost recovery price or the commercial price, whichever is higher, except that lower prices and charges may be established by the Department if it is determined that such lower prices and charges will provide reasonable compensation to the Government and will not discourage the development of sources of supply independent of the DOE of such material.
EXHIBIT
32.2



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of SQN AIF IV, L.P. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, the undersigned,
Jeremiah Silkowski, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The
    Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
    and                   
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                             
|(2) | The
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of the Company.



A
signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the SEC or its staff upon request.



|Date:
    April 15, 2019          | 
|--------------------------------- | 
|                                  | 
|/s/
    Jeremiah Silkowski        | 
|Jeremiah
    Silkowski            | 
|Chief
    Financial Officer       | 
|(Principal
    Financial Officer) |
April 11, 2013

Document Control Office (7407M)

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW

Washington, DC 20460–0001

Re: EPA–HQ–OPPT–2010–0173 Comment on Renovation, Repair, and Painting of LeadBased Paint in Public & Commercial Buildings

To whom it may concern:

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on EPA’s request for information in consideration of 

a proposed rule dealing with lead-based paint renovation, repair, and painting in public and 

commercial buildings. 

I am submitting comments on behalf of the Independent Electrical Contractors, Inc. (IEC), a 

national trade association composed of 64 chapters with more than 3,100 members, employing 

over 100,000 electrical workers. IEC chapters typically train approximately 10,000 apprentices 

per year to become electricians. 

While many of IEC’s members are among the top 50 electrical contractors (ranked by EC&M 

Magazine), more than 50 percent of members are small businesses. IEC members perform work 

in the following industry sectors: residential, commercial, industrial, municipal, hospitals,

airports, schools, defense, and both public and private power generation and distribution. IEC 

members frequently perform work on state and federal projects including work conducted in

support of the federal government’s Defense Base Closure and Realignment (BRAC) initiative.

It is our opinion that workers are presently protected on the jobsite by regulation CFR 1926.62 of 

the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). The OSHA regulation deals with 

construction as well as repairs and improvements. Many procedures in the OSHA regulation 

protect the public as well as workers. 

The EPA should carefully evaluate the OSHA regulations and consider any necessary

recommendations before creating a new EPA regulation. Redundant regulations require 

additional training and may be expensive to implement for small business construction 

contractors. 
Conclusion 

IEC appreciates the opportunity to share our perspective on Renovation, Repair, and Painting of 

Lead-Based Paint in Public & Commercial Buildings. We would like to partisipate any future 

development of a new rule.

Sincerely,

John Masarick

John Masarick

Independent Electrical Contractors, Inc.

VP Codes & Safety

4401 Ford Avenue, Suite 1100

Alexandria, Va. 22302

Phone: 703-549-7351

Direct line: 703-650-0053 Fax: 703-549-7448
Case 3:06-cv-00710-MHT-TFM Document 2 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 3:06-cv-00710-MHT-TFM Document 2 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 3:06-cv-00710-MHT-TFM Document 2 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 3:06-cv-00710-MHT-TFM Document 2 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 4 of 4
§ 1013.27 Computation of time. ( a ) In computing any period of time under this part or in an order issued thereunder, the time begins with the day following the act, event, or default, and includes the last day of the period, unless it is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday observed by the Federal government, in which event it includes the next business day.
( b ) When the period of time allowed is less than seven days, intermediate Saturday, Sundays, and legal holidays observed by the Federal government shall be excluded from the computation.
( c ) Where a document has been served or issued by placing it in the mail, an additional five days will be added to the time permitted for any response.
Motion Granted; Order filed June 12, 2012 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-00530-CV

____________

DALLAS CITY LIMITS PROPERTY CO., L.P., Appellant

V.

AUSTIN JOCKEY CLUB, LTD., CRADY, JEWETT & MCCULLEY, L.L.P., AND 

KTAGS DOWNS HOLDING COMPANY, L.L.C, Appellees

On Appeal from the 127th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2010-16733

ORDER

This is an appeal from a judgment signed May 24, 2012. On June 11, 2012, 

appellant filed a motion in this court requesting temporary stay of post-judgment 

proceedings pending this court’s review of the trial court’s order setting appeal bond. See 

Tex. R. App. P. 24.4. 

It appears from the facts stated in the motion that appellant’s rights will be 

prejudiced unless immediate temporary relief is granted. Accordingly, we grant the 

motion and issue the following order.
We therefore ORDER that post-judgment proceedings in the court below be 

stayed in trial court cause number 2010-16733, styled Crady, Jewett & McCulley v. 

Austin Jockey Club, Ltd., Dallas City Limits Property Co., L.P. and KTAGS Downs 

Holding Company, LLC. The proceedings are stayed until decision by this court of 

appellant’s motion to review order on supersedeas bond or until further orders of this 

court.

PER CURIAM
2007-1375.

#### In re Gulley.

Hamilton App. No. C-060375. Reported at 116 Ohio St.3d 1411, 2007-Ohio-6140, 876 N.E.2d 969. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
# Subpart 1522.8 - Equal Employment Opportunity

**Parent topic:**PART 1522 - APPLICATION OF LABOR LAWS TO GOVERNMENT ACQUISITIONS

## 1522.803 Responsibilities.

If the applicability of E.O. 11246 and implementing regulations are questioned, the Contracting Officer shall route the matter through the CCO to the EPA Office of Civil Rights. 

## 1522.804 Affirmative action programs.

## 1522.804-2 Construction.

Each contracting office having construction contract responsibility shall maintain a list of geographical areas subject to affirmative action requirements. The list can be obtained from the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, U.S. Department of Labor.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

RALPH WILSON LINGO, )

)

 Petitioner, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06-CV-703-MHT

)

STATE OF ALABAMA, et al., )

)

 Respondents. )

ORDER ON MOTION

Upon review of the document filed by the petitioner on June 27, 2008 (Court Doc.

No. 64), which the court construes to contain a motion for dismissal of his state criminal

conviction for intimidating a witness, and for good cause, it is

ORDERED that this motion be and is hereby DENIED. 

Done this 30th day of June, 2008.

 /s/ Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00703-MHT-CSC Document 66 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 1 of 1
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****InfoDomain:information superiority for the warfighter.**** 
SuDocNumber:D201.43:
ItemNumber:0370-A-03(online)
CGPsystem Number: 000596952
 
2006
Winter06-07.pdf
 
2008
Fall08.pdf
Winter08_09.pdf
 
2009
Summer09.pdf
Fall09.pdf
Winter09-10.pdf
 
2010
Spring10.pdf
Summer10.pdf
Fall10.pdf
 
2011
Fall2011.pdf
WinterFall2011-12.pddf
2012
Fall_2012.pdf
2013
Summer13.pdf
Fall_Winter13.pdf
 
2014
Spring14.pdf
Summer14.pdf
Fall_Winter14.pdf
 
 **
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

ELRICK HARRIS, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

 ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv630-ID

v. )

 )

OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORP., )

et al., )

 )

Defendants. )

ORDER

Upon CONSIDERATION of the unopposed motion for leave to file first

amendment to answer, (Doc. No. 17), filed by Defendants Option One Mortgage

Corporation and H&R Block Mortgage Corporation, it is ORDERED that said motion be

and the same is hereby GRANTED. 

Done this 8th day of December, 2006.

 /s/ Ira DeMent 

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 18 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### § 993.8 Natural condition prunes.

*Natural condition prunes* means prunes which have not been processed.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Authority:

7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 868.101 General information.

The Agricultural Marketing Service, (AMS) of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) facilitates the fair and efficient marketing of agricultural products by maintaining voluntary grade standards for Beans, Whole Dry Peas, Split Peas, and Lentils, which provide a uniform language for describing the quality of these commodities in the marketplace. These standards may cover (but are not limited to) terms, classes, quality levels, performance criteria, and inspection requirements. Procedures contained in this part set forth the process which AMS will follow in developing, issuing, revising, suspending, or terminating the U.S. standards for Beans, Whole Dry Peas, Split Peas, and Lentils. Communications about AMS standards in general should be addressed to the Administrator, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-3601.
Subpart 1333.1 - Protests

Parent topic: PART 1333 - PROTESTS, DISPUTES, AND APPEALS

1333.101 Definitions.

Protest Decision Authority means agency officials above the level of the contracting officer who have

been designated by the Procurement Executive to issue agency protest decisions under Executive

Order 12979.

1333.102 General.

(a) Contracting officers shall promptly notify the Procurement Counsel, and seek legal advice upon

receiving notice that a protest has been filed in any forum.

(b) The designee authorized to determine that a solicitation, proposed award, or award under

protest does not comply with the requirements of law or regulation, and to take the actions specified

at FAR 33.102 (b) is set forth in CAM 1301.70. Corrective action shall only be taken after

consultation with Procurement Counsel.

1333.103 Protests to the agency.

(a) Insert provision 1352.233-70, Agency Protests, in all DOC solicitations, except these issued by

the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

(b) All agency protest decisions shall be reviewed by Procurement Counsel before submission to the

protester.

1333.104 Protests to GAO.

1333.104-70 Protests to GAO and Court of Federal Claims.

(a) Insert clause 1352.233-71, GAO and Court of Federal Claims Protests, in all DOC solicitations,

except those for the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

(b) Only Procurement Counsel shall communicate with the Government Accountability Office (GAO),

the Court of Federal Claims and the Department of Justice regarding applicable protests.

Procurement Counsel shall be responsible for preparation and submission of the agency report to

the GAO and litigation reports to the Department of Justice.

(c) The designee authorized to authorize, on a nondelegable basis, the award of a contract when the

agency has received notice from the GAO of a preaward protest filed directly with the GAO is set

forth in CAM 1301.70.
(d) The designee authorized to authorize, on a nondelegable basis, contract performance

notwithstanding protest after award is set forth in CAM 1301.70.

(e) The designee authorized to report and explain the reasons why the agency has not fully

implement GAO recommendations with respect to a protest is set forth in CAM 1301.70.
Case 1:06-cv-00699-WHA-CSC Document 2 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00699-WHA-CSC Document 2 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 2 of 2