alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 118 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 118

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on the Judiciary in 
                    the One Hundred Ninth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 16, 2005

    Mr. Sensenbrenner submitted the following resolution; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on the Judiciary in 
                    the One Hundred Ninth Congress.

    Resolved, 

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on the Judiciary (hereafter in 
this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including the 
expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the 
applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for committee 
salaries and expenses, not more than $18,263,200.80 for the One Hundred 
Ninth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $8,972,238.42 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2005, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2006; and
            (2) not more than $9,290,962.38 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2006, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2007.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 94
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 94 appear at 61 FR 51352, Oct. 2 1996.

§ 94.4 Analytical methods. The majority of analytical methods used by the USDA laboratories to perform mandatory analyses for egg products are listed as follows: ( a ) Compendium Methods for the Microbiological Examination of Foods, Carl Vanderzant and Don Splittstoesser (Editors), American Public Health Association, 1015 Fifteenth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005.
( b ) Edwards, P.R. and W.H. Ewing, Edwards and Ewing's Identification of Enterobacteriaceae, Elsevier Science, Inc., Regional Sales Office, 655 Avenue of the Americas, P.O. Box 945, New York, NY 10159-0945.
( c ) FDA Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM), AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 481 North Frederick Avenue, Suite 500, Gaithersburg, MD 20877-2417.
( d ) Manual of Analytical Methods for the Analysis of Pesticide Residues in Human and Environmental Samples, EPA 600/9-80-038, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Chemical Exposure Research Branch, EPA Office of Research and Development (ORD), 26 West Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268.
( e ) Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL, Volumes I & II, AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 481 North Frederick Avenue, Suite 500, Gaithersburg, MD 20877-2417.
( f ) Standard Methods for the Examination of Dairy Products, American Public Health Association, 1015 Fifteenth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005.
( g ) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, American Public Health Association (APHA), the American Water Works Association (AWWA) and the Water Pollution Control Federation, AWWA Bookstore, 6666 West Quincy Avenue, Denver, CO 80235.
( h ) Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste Physical/Chemical Methods, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste, SW-846 Integrated Manual (available from National Technical Information Service (NTIS), U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161).
( i ) U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Pesticide Analytical Manuals (PAM), Volumes I and II, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN), 200 C Street, SW, Washington, DC 20204 (available from National Technical Information Service (NTIS), U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161).
[65 FR 64318, Oct. 26, 2000]
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 82 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 82 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 82 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 3 of 3
§ 1015.216 Exemptions. ( a ) The preceding sections of this part, to the extent they reflect remedies or procedures prescribed by the Debt Collection Act of 1982 and the DCIA, such as administrative offset, use of credit bureaus, contracting for collection agencies, and interest and related charges, do not apply to debts arising under, or payments made under, the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (26 U.S.C. 1, *et seq.*); the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 301, *et seq.*) except to the extent provided under 42 U.S.C. 404 and 31 U.S.C. 3716(c); or the tariff laws of the United States. These remedies and procedures, however, may be authorized with respect to debts that are exempt from the Debt Collection Act of 1982 and the DCIA, to the extent that they are authorized under some other statute or the common law.
( b ) This section should not be construed as prohibiting the use of these authorities or requirements when collecting debts owed by persons employed by agencies administering the laws cited in paragraph (a) of this section unless the debt arose under those laws.
1335.001 Definitions.

Human subject means a living individual about whom an investigator (whether professional or

student) conducting research obtains:

(1) Data through intervention or interaction with the individual, or

(2) Identifiable private information.

Intervention includes both physical procedures by which data are gathered (for example,

venipuncture) and manipulations of the subject or the subject's environment that are performed for

research purposes. Interaction includes communication or interpersonal contact between

investigator and subject. “Private information” includes information about behavior that occurs in a

context in which an individual can reasonably expect that no observation or recording is taking

place, and information which has been provided for specific purposes by an individual and which the

individual can reasonably expect will not be made public (for example, a medical record). Private

information must be individually identifiable (i.e., the identity of the subject is or may readily be

ascertained by the investigator or associated with the information) in order for obtaining the

information to constitute research involving human subjects.

Research means a systematic investigation, including research, development, testing and evaluation,

designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge. Activities which meet this definition

constitute research for purposes of this policy, whether or not they are conducted or supported

under a program which is considered research for other purposes. For example, some demonstration

and service programs may include research activities.

Parent topic: PART 1335 - RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING
160 So.2d 229

#### Anthony L. OCCHIPINTI v. MARQUETTE CASUALTY COMPANY.

No. 47082.

Feb. 14, 1964.

In re: Marquette Casualty Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of St. Landry. 158 So.2d 389.

The application is denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, the judgment complained of is correct.,
LEGAL02/30203491v1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

ROBERT D. BROOKS and ALICE 

BRADLEY,

)

)

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. )

)

Civil Action No. 

2:06-CV-680-LES-CSC

PACTIV CORPORATION and LOUISIANAPACIFIC CORPORATION, )

)

)

Defendants. )

)

DEFENDANT LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORPORATION’S 

MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT SIX

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) and 7(b), Defendant Louisiana-Pacific Corporation 

(“Louisiana-Pacific”) moves this Court for an Order dismissing Count Six of Plaintiffs’ 

Complaint. As set forth in the accompanying Memorandum of Law, Count Six fails to state a 

valid claim under the Alabama Extended Manufacturer’s Liability Doctrine. Therefore, 

pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), Count Six must be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which 

relief may be granted. 

Case 2:06-cv-00680-LES-CSC Document 11 Filed 12/22/2006 Page 1 of 4
2

LEGAL02/30203491v1

Respectfully submitted this 22nd day of December, 2006.

/s/Bernard Taylor

Bernard Taylor (admitted pro hac vice)

Douglas S. Arnold (admitted pro hac vice)

Orlyn O. Lockard, III (admitted pro hac vice)

Counsel for Defendant Louisiana-Pacific

Corporation

OF COUNSEL:

ALSTON & BIRD LLP

One Atlantic Center

1201 West Peachtree Street, N.W.

Atlanta, Georgia 30309

Tel: (404) 881-7000

Fax: (404) 881-7777

bernard.taylor@alston.com

doug.arnold@alston.com

skip.lockard@alston.com

ADDITIONAL COUNSEL:

Dennis R. Bailey 

ASB No. 4845-I71D

R. Austin Huffaker 

ASB NO. 3422-F55R

RUSHTON, STAKELY, JOHNSON, & GARRETT, P.A.

184 Commerce Street

Post Office Box 270

Montgomery, AL 36101

Tel: (334) 206-3100

Fax: (334) 262-6277

drb@rsjg.com (Bailey)

rah2@rsjg.com (Huffaker)

Case 2:06-cv-00680-LES-CSC Document 11 Filed 12/22/2006 Page 2 of 4
3

LEGAL02/30203491v1

Laura Proctor

ASB 1504-R54L

Associate General Counsel

Louisiana-Pacific Corporation

414 Union Street North, Suite 2000

Nashville, Tennessee 37219

Tel: (615) 986-5878

Fax: 1-866-741-5091

laura.proctor@lpcorp.com

Case 2:06-cv-00680-LES-CSC Document 11 Filed 12/22/2006 Page 3 of 4
4

LEGAL02/30203491v1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 22nd day of December, 2006, I filed the foregoing via the 

CM/ECF system which will send notice of said filing to the following:

W. Eason Mitchell

Gregory A. Cade

Fred R. DeLeon

W. Lee Gresham, III

Robert Leslie Palmer

Mark R. TerMolen

John C. Berghoff, Jr.

Matthew C. Sostrin

John A. Earnhardt

H. Thomas Wells, Jr.

Richard Elder Crum

/s/Orlyn O. Lockard, III

Of Counsel

Case 2:06-cv-00680-LES-CSC Document 11 Filed 12/22/2006 Page 4 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00730-MHT-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00730-MHT-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00730-MHT-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00730-MHT-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 4 of 4
Case 1:06-cv-00708-CSC Document 39 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### § 1003.13 Alternative Dispute Resolution.

The DOE encourages the use of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) to resolve disputes and controversies at any stage of the proceedings. Accordingly, parties appearing before the OHA are encouraged to use ADR when practical. The DOE Alternative Dispute Resolution Office, which employs multiple neutrals trained in mediation and other ADR services, provides ADR services for disputes involving the DOE and its affiliated organizations (*e.g.,* DOE contractors). ADR is voluntary and the OHA will never require parties to engage in settlement negotiations or mediation.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION



I, N. Voloshin, Chief Financial Officer
of Cavitation Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



The Annual Report on Amendment No. 4 on
Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2016 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. § 78m); and



The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: April 28, 2017 | /s/ N. VOLOSHIN               
|-------------------- | ------------------------------
|                     | Name: N. Voloshin             
|                     | Title: Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### O’CONNOR, Appellant, v. NEW YORK TRANSP. CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July 12, 1906.)

Action by Sarah O’Connor, as administratrix, against the New York Transportation Company. T. J. O’Neill, for appellant. A. K. Wing, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed.
Subpart 1016.5 - Indefinite-Delivery

Contracts

Parent topic: PART 1016 - TYPES OF CONTRACTS

1016.505 Ordering.

(b)(8) The HCA shall designate a task and delivery order ombudsman in accordance with bureau

procedures and provide a copy of the designation to the agency task and delivery order ombudsman.

Bureau task and delivery order ombudsmen shall review complaints from contractors concerning

task and delivery orders placed by the contracting activity and ensure they are afforded a fair

opportunity to be considered, consistent with the procedures in the contract. In the absence of a

designation, the Bureau advocate for competition will serve in that capacity.
§ 981.474 Other reports. ( a ) *Report of shipments and commitments.* Each handler shall report on ABC Form 25-1 all shipments of almonds, inshell, shelled, and products by classification (domestic and export by countries of destination); and on ABC Form 25-2 all commitments (almonds not shipped, but sold or otherwise obligated) whether domestic contract, export contract, or non-contract. If the destination of any export is unknown to the handler, such handler shall have the broker/exporter furnish this information to the Board. In support of this report, the handler shall keep invoices on the shipments, or such other documentation as may be acceptable to the Board. The reports shall be received by the Board within five calendar days after the close of each month of the crop year.
( b ) *Reserve reports.* In any crop year when reserve almonds are diverted to noncompetitive outlets, such handler shall report such handler's intentions to divert on ABC Form 13 and the completion of diversion on ABC Form 14. Upon notice to all handlers, the Board may waive the requirements to file ABC Form 13 for diversion of almonds to noncompetitive outlets which are acceptable to the Board.
( c ) *Handler information reports.* Each handler shall file no later than September 1 of each year ABC Form 42, a Handler Information Sheet, listing the handler's name, address, phone number, ownership or corporate information and acknowledging receipt of marketing order program information.
[50 FR 47709, Nov. 20, 1985, as amended at 51 FR 9763, Mar. 21, 1986; 54 FR 5409, Feb. 3, 1989; 58 FR 34696, June 29, 1993]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

)

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-CR-00202-WKW

)

EUGENE CLECKLER and )

KIM CLECKLER )

ORDER

This case is before the Court on motions to continue trial filed by Kim Cleckler (Doc. # 34)

and filed by Eugene Cleckler (Doc. # 35). The criminal case is currently set for trial during the

October 16, 2006 term. For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds that the trial should be

continued pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h).

While the grant of a continuance is left to the sound discretion of the trial judge, United

States v. Stitzer, 785 F.2d 1506, 1516 (11th Cir. 1986), the Court is limited by the requirements of

the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161. The Act provides in part:

In any case in which a plea of not guilty is entered, the trial of a defendant charged

in an information or indictment with the commission of an offense shall commence

within seventy days from the filing date (and making public) of the information or

indictment, or from the date the defendant has appeared before a judicial officer of

the court in which such charge is pending, whichever date last occurs.

18 U.S.C. § 3161(c)(1). However, the Act excludes from the 70 day period any continuance based

on “findings that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the

public and the defendant in a speedy trial.” § 3161(h)(8)(A).

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by continuing this trial outweigh the best

interest of the public and Ms. Cleckler and Mr. Cleckler in a speedy trial. In support of their motions

to continue and their motions for extension of time to pretrial motions, the defendants represent that

Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 38 Filed 09/20/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

additional time is needed to review voluminous discovery material and to otherwise prepare for trial.

The government does not oppose a continuance, and the defendants have filed waivers of their

Speedy Trial Act rights.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the motions to continue trial filed by Kim Cleckler

(Doc. # 34) and filed by Eugene Cleckler (Doc. # 35) are GRANTED. Trial in this matter is

continued from October 16, 2006, to the criminal term of court beginning on January 8, 2007, at

10:00 a.m.

DONE this the 20th day of September, 2006.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 38 Filed 09/20/2006 Page 2 of 2
PART 29 ––TAXES

 SUBPART 29.1 — GENERAL

 29.101 Resolving tax problems.

SUBPART 29.1 — GENERAL

29.101 Resolving tax problems.

(a)(S-90) Contracting officers should request assistance from legal counsel and the PL842 Cost and

Pricing Branch. PL842 can provide assistance on applicability and reasonableness prior to

negotiations.
§ 981.450 Exempt dispositions. As provided in § 981.50, any handler disposing of almonds for crushing into oil, or for animal feed, may have the kernel weight of these almonds excluded from their program obligations, so long as: ( a ) The handler qualifies as, or delivers such almonds to, a Board-approved accepted user;
( b ) Each delivery is made directly to the accepted user by June 30 of each crop year; and
( c ) Each delivery is certified to the Board by the handler on ABC Form 8.
[88 FR 67627, Oct. 2, 2023]
#### § 1014.11 Penalties.

A person who files a false claim or makes a false or fraudulent statement in a claim against the United States may be liable to a fine of not more than $10,000 or to imprisonment for not more than 5 years, or both (18 U.S.C. 1001), and, in addtion, to a forfeiture of $2,000 and a penalty of double the loss or damage sustained by the United States (31 U.S.C 231).
# 3406.501 Requirement.

The Competition Advocate for the Department is the Deputy Director, Contracts and Acquisitions Management.     

**Parent topic:**Subpart 3406.5—Advocates for Competition
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ANGELA DENISE NAILS, *

*

PLAINTIFF, * 1:06-CV-00737.WKW

*

vs. *

*

DOTHAN RESCUE MISSION, *

*

DEFENDANT. *

AMENDED ANSWER

THE DEFENDANT, Dothan Rescue Mission, amends its answer

to plead the following affirmative defense as follows:

6

th Defense

Defendant pleads release.

HARDWICK, HAUSE, SEGREST & WALDING

BY: /s/ Kevin Walding 

Kevin Walding (WAL036)

ASB-8121-I-69J

Attorney for Defendant

Post Office Box 1469

Dothan, Alabama 36302

Phone: (334) 794-4144

Fax: (334) 671-9330

Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 19 Filed 11/28/2006 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that, this date, I have served a copy

of this document on the Plaintiff by placing same in the

United States Mail in a properly addressed envelope with

prepaid postage.

Angela Denise Nails

342 South Saint Andrews Street

Apartment 808

Dothan, Alabama 36301

This the 28th day of November, 2006. 

 /s/ Kevin Walding 

Of Counsel

Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 19 Filed 11/28/2006 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 35.1



LOGO

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)

Cenlar FSB

The undersigned, a duly
authorized officer of Cenlar FSB, as servicer (the Servicer) pursuant to the applicable servicing agreements governing the securities listed on Exhibit A, does hereby certify that:

1. A review of the Servicers activities during the period 1/1/15 to 12/31/15, (the Reporting Period) and of the Servicers performance
under the applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 29th day of February 2016.



|       |  |                      
|------ |  | ---------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Michael Blair    
|Name:  |  | Michael Blair        
|Title: |  | Senior Vice President



---

Exhibit A

Securities Covered in Cenlar FSBs Servicer Compliance Statement 1123:

Redwood Trust, Inc.



|         |  |                                       |  |             |  |                                  
|-------- |  | ------------------------------------- |  | ----------- |  | ---------------------------------
|Investor |  | Issuer                                |  | Security    |  | *Period
Subserviced by Cenlar
FSB
|H06      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2012-1 |  | 1/1 to 12/31/15                  
|K06      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2012-2 |  | 1/1 to 12/31/15                  
|L06      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2012-3 |  | 1/1 to 12/31/15                  
|Z06      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2012-4 |  | 1/1 to 12/31/15                  
|Y06      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2012-5 |  | 1/1 to 12/31/15                  
|RW0      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2012-6 |  | 1/1 to 12/31/15                  
|RW1      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2013-1 |  | 1/1 to 12/31/15                  
|RW2/S11  |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2013-2 |  | 1/1 to 12/31/15                  
|RW3      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2013-3 |  | 1/1 to 12/31/15                  
|RW4      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2013-4 |  | 1/1 to 12/31/15                  
|RW5      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2013-5 |  | 1/1 to 12/31/15                  
|RW6      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2013-6 |  | 1/1 to 12/31/15                  
|RW7      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2013-7 |  | 1/1 to 12/31/15