alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 112

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

February 16, 2005.

Resolved, That the following Member be, and is hereby,

elected to the following standing committee of the House of

Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON RESOURCES: Mrs. Musgrave.

Attest:

Clerk.
**CERTIFICATIONS

**Exhibit 31.2  **Certification of Principal Accounting and Financial Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 **CERTIFICATIONS
I, Lawrence A. Heilbronner, certify that: 
1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Canandaigua National Corporation; 
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 
4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  
(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosures controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  
(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  
(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 
5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  
(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  
(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

August 9, 2004 
/s/ Lawrence A. Heilbronner
Date 
Lawrence A. Heilbronner, Principal Financial and  
Accounting Officer

 ********
Flsl lÐtú

Janury 16,2012

Dr. Maria Doa

Director, Chemical Control Division

U.S. EPA

1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW (MC 7405M)

Washington, D.C.20460

Dear Dr. Doa:

The Carpet and Rug lnstitute is aware of the environmental and sustainability trends occuning

in the world. ln keeping with their longstanding commitment to environmental responsib¡lity,

carpet industry members of The Carpet and Rug lnstitute have discontinued the use of products

known as PFOA (CB or higher chemistries). The United States carpet industry members of The

Carpet and Rug lnstitute voluntarily switched to less persistent and controversial compounds

beginning prior to 2003 and completing sometime near the end of 2005 or beginning of 2006.

This voluntary move was not in response to specific or credible scientific research available at

that time showing a risk associated with C8 chemistries. Rather, it was a precautionary move

made to ensure the absolute and total safety of the products we make.

To be clear, there is no use of the chemistry known as PFOA among the manufacturing

membership of The Carpet and Rug lnstitute. The Carpet and Rug lnstitute does not track data

from non-United States manufacturers orthe few domestic manufacturers who are not members

of The Carpet and Rug lnstitute.

The manufacturer members of ïhe Carpet and Rug lnstitute are proud of their long and

consistent history of producing a safe, functional, and beautiful product for millions of families

and workpleces around the world. You can recognize The Carpet and Rug lnstitute mark as a

sign of trust and our diligent efforts to produce the safest and finest quality carpet and rug

products in the world.

Sincerely,

Wemer H. Braun

Presidertt

cc: Mr. Toni Krasnic

EPA

1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW

MC-7405M

Washington, D.C.20460

å-";E

cärpet-rug.orS lYr,(tl P.O. Box 2048 Dalton Georsia 30722-2048...706.278.3176 åüt
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW     Document 49      Filed 06/12/2007     Page 1 of 1
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear at 70 FR 30897, May 31, 2005; 77 FR 39904, July 6, 2012; 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

#### § 10.26 Appointment of Hearing Examiner.

The appointment of a Hearing Examiner, pursuant to § 10.24 of this part, shall be from a list of qualified attorneys possessing the highest degree of integrity, ability, and good judgment. To qualify, an attorney shall have an NRC “Q” access authorization and may be an employee of the NRC, its contractors, agents or licensees. However, no employee or consultant of the NRC shall serve as Hearing Examiner hearing the case of an employee (including a consultant) or applicant for employment with the NRC; nor shall any employee or consultant of an NRC contractor, agent or licensee serve as Hearing Examiner hearing the case of an employee (including a consultant) or an applicant for employment of that contractor, agent, or licensee. No Hearing Examiner shall be selected who has knowledge of the case or of any information relevant to the disposition of it, or who for any reason would be unable to issue a fair and unbiased recommendation.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Burton Jeffrey Hunter, Appellant.

Submitted September 24, 2007;

decided October 18, 2007

Reported below, 41 AD3d 885.

Motion to vacate this Court’s August 31, 2007 dismissal order granted *[see*9 NY3d 871].
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                      20,227,697
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               33,893,384
<ALLOWANCES>                                   243,031
<INVENTORY>                                 12,846,247
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            69,760,734
<PP&E>                                      45,157,125
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,511,784
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             107,522,183
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       18,450,342
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,681
<OTHER-SE>                                  87,366,866
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               107,522,183
<SALES>                                     54,018,617
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            54,018,617
<CGS>                                       22,896,334
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               22,896,334
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (8,510)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,552,919
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,065,876
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,487,043
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,487,043
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15
        

</TABLE>
§ 987.31 Procedure. ( a ) A majority of the Committee shall constitute a quorum.
( b ) The Committee shall, from among its members, select a chairman and such other officers and adopt such rules for the conduct of its business as it may deem advisable.
( c ) For any decision of the Committee to be valid, a concurring vote of at least five members is required, except as follows: ( 1 ) In matters relating to restructuring Committee composition pursuant to § 987.21, concurrence by at least eight members is required;
( 2 ) In matters relating to establishment, modification and application of free and restricted percentages pursuant to §§ 987.44 and 987.46, concurrence by at least seven members is required; and
( 3 ) In matters relating to recommendation of any program of paid advertising or major program of market promotion pursuant to § 987.33, concurrence by at least six members is required.
( d ) At the discretion of the chairperson, Committee meetings may be assembled or conducted by means of teleconference, video conference, or other means of communication that may be developed. Assembled meetings may also allow for participation by means of teleconference or video conference or other communication methods, at the discretion of the chair. Members participating in meetings via any of these alternative means retain the same voting privileges that they would otherwise have.
( e ) The Committee may vote upon any proposition by mail, or by telephone when confirmed in writing within two weeks, upon due notice and full and identical explanation to all members, including alternates acting as members, but any such action shall not be considered valid unless unanimously approved.
( f ) If the total number of members of the Committee is changed pursuant to § 987.21, the minimum voting requirements shall be in the same ratio to the revised total number of members, as nearly as practicable, as the minimum voting requirements prescribed in paragraph (c) of this section are to nine.
[36 FR 15038, Aug. 12, 1971, as amended at 43 FR 4252, Feb. 1, 1978; 77 FR 37765, June 25, 2012]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CR. NO. 2:06-cr-202-WKW

) (WO)

EUGENE L. CLECKLER and )

KIM CLECKLER )

O R D E R

On January 2, 2007, the Government filed a motion requesting that the court set the

trial date for this case no earlier than Wednesday, January 10, 2007. (Doc. # 69.) 

It is ORDERED that:

1. The motion (Docs. # 69) is GRANTED.

2. Barring unforseen circumstances, the trial in this case will commence Wednesday,

January 10, 2007. 

DONE this 4th day of January, 2007.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 73 Filed 01/04/2007 Page 1 of 1
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 24-1486

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. DeJuan Lamarr Howard lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

____________ Submitted: August 5, 2024 Filed: August 8, 2024 [Unpublished]

____________ Before KELLY, GRASZ, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. DeJuan Howard pleaded guilty to drug and firearm offenses pursuant to a plea agreement containing an appeal waiver. He now appeals the sentence imposed by thedistrict court. 1 His counsel has moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the substantive reasonableness of the sentence. Upon careful review, we conclude that the appeal waiver is valid, enforceable, and applicable to the issues raised in this appeal. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (noting that we review validity and applicability of appeal waiver de novo); United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (stating that appeal waiver will be enforced if appeal falls within scope of waiver, defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into plea agreement and waiver, and enforcing waiver would not result in miscarriage of justice). We have independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal outside the scope of the appeal waiver. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and dismiss this appeal.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Howard F. Sachs, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. -2-
**Exhibit      31.3**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

| 1)   | I                have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to quarterly report on Form 10-Q                of                Greene County Bancshares, Inc. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2)   | Based                on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement                of a                material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make                the                statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements                were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this                report. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                       |                                                                              |                                  |
|--------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                                  |                                                                         |                             |
| Date: September              12, 2005 | By:                                                                     | /s/ R.              Stan Puckett |
|                                       | R.              Stan Puckett                                                      |
|                                       | Chairman              of the Board and Chief Executive              Officer  |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1054 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1054

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 29, 2006.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 5441) making 
appropriations for the Department of Homeland Security for the fiscal year 
ending September 30, 2007, and for other purposes. All points of order against 
the conference report and against its consideration are waived. The conference 
report shall be considered as read.
    Sec. 2. Upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order without 
intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the bill (S. 3930) 
to authorize trial by military commission for violations of the law of war, and 
for other purposes. The bill shall be considered as read. The previous question 
shall be considered as ordered on the bill to final passage without intervening 
motion except: (1) one hour of debate, with 40 minutes equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Armed 
Services and 20 minutes equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary; and (2) one motion to 
commit.
    Sec. 3. Upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order without 
intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 4772) 
to simplify and expedite access to the Federal courts for injured parties whose 
rights and privileges under the United States Constitution have been deprived by 
final actions of Federal agencies or other government officials or entities 
acting under color of State law, and for other purposes. The amendment in the 
nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary now printed 
in the bill shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be 
considered as read. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
bill, as amended, to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one 
hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary; and (2) one motion to 
recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### § 110.80 Basis for hearings.

The procedures in this part will constitute the exclusive basis for hearings on export and import license applications.

[75 FR 44093, July 28, 2010]
5208.001 General

Regardless of the source of supplies or services to be acquired, competitively procured services

defined in Annex 22, Seaport Engineering and Program Management Categories, shall comply with

requirements in 5237.102 and Annex 23.

Parent topic: Part 5208 - REQUIRED SOURCES OF SUPPLIES AND SERVICES
#### § 1017.26 Destruction.

A document marked as containing UCNI must be destroyed, at a minimum, by using a cross-cut shredder that produces particles no larger than 1/4-inch wide and 2 inches long. Other comparable destruction methods may be used. Material containing or revealing UCNI must be destroyed according to agency directives.
Case 2:06-cv-00738-MEF-WC Document 2 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302**

**of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Fung (Terence) Sien, certify that: 

 

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ALPHA SPACECOM, INC.; 

 

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

 

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

 

b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

 

c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.

I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

 

a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

 

b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 19, 2004
#### Southern Railway Company *v.*Garland.

September 24, 1913.

Action for damages. Before Judge Jones. Stephens superior court. May 13,1912.

Beck, *J.*

1. The exceptions to the charge of the court and to the rulings made during the trial are without merit".

2. The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*593
      *Fermor Barrett, DeW. Owen,*and *A. G. & Julian McCurry,*for plaintiff in error. *Claude Bond,*contra.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2017319DE.01009001.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 5.12.2017 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 319/90 |

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 800/2013 der Kommission vom 14. August 2013 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 965/2012 zur Festlegung technischer Vorschriften und von Verwaltungsverfahren in Bezug auf den Flugbetrieb gemäß der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 216/2008 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates

(
[Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 227 vom 24. August 2013](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2013_227_R_TOC)
)

Seite 4, Artikel 1 Nummer 19 zur Änderung von Anhang II ARO.OPS.200 Buchstabe b Nummer 2 der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 965/2012:

Anstatt:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „2. | dem Verzeichnis der Sondergenehmigungen, wie in Anlage V festgelegt, für nichtgewerblichen Luftverkehrsbetrieb.‘“ |

muss es heißen:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „2. | dem Verzeichnis der Sondergenehmigungen, wie in Anlage V festgelegt, für nichtgewerblichen Flugbetrieb.‘“ |

Seite 10, Anhang III zur Änderung des Titels von Anhang VI der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 965/2012:

Anstatt:

„
NICHTGEWERBLICHER BETRIEB MIT TECHNISCH KOMPLIZIERTEN MOTORGETRIEBENEN LUFTFAHRZEUGEN
“

muss es heißen:

„
NICHTGEWERBLICHER FLUGBETRIEB MIT TECHNISCH KOMPLIZIERTEN MOTORGETRIEBENEN LUFTFAHRZEUGEN
“

Seite 46, Anhang IV zur Änderung des Titels von Anhang VII der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 965/2012:

Anstatt:

„
NICHTGEWERBLICHER LUFTVERKEHR MIT ANDEREN ALS TECHNISCH KOMPLIZIERTEN MOTORGETRIEBENEN LUFTFAHRZEUGEN
“

muss es heißen:

„
NICHTGEWERBLICHER FLUGBETRIEB MIT ANDEREN ALS TECHNISCH KOMPLIZIERTEN MOTORGETRIEBENEN LUFTFAHRZEUGEN
“

---