alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, John M. Hoskins, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Tennessee Valley Authority;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and we have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors: a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.Date: July6, 2007                                  /s/ John M. Hoskins   John M. Hoskins   Interim Chief Financial Officer and Executive VicePresident, Financial Services
#### § 58.635 Pasteurization of the mix.

Every particle of the mix, except added flavoring ingredients, shall be pasteurized at not less than 155 °F. and held at that temperature for 30 minutes or for 175 °F. for 25 seconds; or it may be pasteurized by any other equivalent temperature and holding time which will assure adequate pasteurization.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

§ 810.802 Definition of other terms. ( a ) *Damaged kernels.* Kernels and pieces of grain kernels for which standards have been established under the Act, that are badly ground-damaged, badly weather-damaged, diseased, frost-damaged, germ-damaged, heat-damaged, insect-bored, mold-damaged, sprout-damaged, or otherwise materially damaged.
( b ) *Foreign material and fines.* All matter other than whole flaxseed that passes through a 5 ⁄ 64 triangular-hole sieve, and all matter other than grains for which standards have been established under the Act, that remains in the sieved sample.
( c ) *Grades.* U.S. Mixed Grain, or U.S. Sample grade Mixed Grain, and special grades.
( d ) *Heat-damaged kernels.* Kernels and pieces of grain kernels for which standards have been established under the Act, that are materially discolored and damaged by heat.
( e ) *Sieve* —*5⁄64 triangular-hole sieve.* A metal sieve 0.032 inch thick with equilateral triangular perforations the inscribed circles of which are 0.0781 (5 ⁄ 64) inch in diameter.
215.404-4 Profit.

(b) Policy.

(1) Contracting officers shall use a structured approach for developing a prenegotiation profit or fee

objective on any negotiated contract action when certified cost or pricing data is obtained, except

for cost-plus-award-fee contracts (see 215.404-74 , 216.405-2 , and FAR 16.405-2) or contracts with

Federally Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDCs) (see 215.404-75 ). There are three

structured approaches—

(A) The weighted guidelines method;

(B) The modified weighted guidelines method; and

(C) An alternate structured approach.

(c) Contracting officer responsibilities.

(1) Also, do not perform a profit analysis when assessing cost realism in competitive acquisitions.

(2) When using a structured approach, the contracting officer—

(A) Shall use the weighted guidelines method (see 215.404-71 ), except as provided in paragraphs

(c)(2)(B) and (c)(2)(C) of this subsection.

(B) Shall use the modified weighted guidelines method (see 215.404-72 ) on contract actions with

nonprofit organizations other than FFRDCs.

(C) May use an alternate structured approach (see 215.404-73 ) when—

(1) The contract action is—

(i) At or below the certified cost or pricing data threshold (see FAR 15.403-4(a)(1));

(ii) For architect-engineer or construction work;

(iii) Primarily for delivery of material from subcontractors; or

(iv) A termination settlement; or

(2) The weighted guidelines method does not produce a reasonable overall profit objective and the

head of the contracting activity approves use of the alternate approach in writing.

(D) Shall use the weighted guidelines method to establish a basic profit rate under a formula-type

pricing agreement, and may then use the basic rate on all actions under the agreement, provided

that conditions affecting profit do not change.

(E) Shall document the profit analysis in the contract file.

(5) Although specific agreement on the applied weights or values for individual profit factors shall

not be attempted, the contracting officer may encourage the contractor to—
(A) Present the details of its proposed profit amounts in the weighted guidelines format or similar

structured approach; and

(B) Use the weighted guidelines method in developing profit objectives for negotiated subcontracts.

(6) The contracting officer must also verify that relevant variables have not materially changed (e.g.,

performance risk, interest rates, progress payment rates, distribution of facilities capital).

(d) Profit-analysis factors.

(1) Common factors. The common factors are embodied in the DoD structured approaches and need

not be further considered by the contracting officer.

Parent topic: 215.404 Proposal analysis.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Marena Harris, Respondent, v. Jewish Family Service et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Herlihy, P. J.

Appeal by the employer and its insurance carrier from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed April 7, 1969, awarding benefits to the claimant. On August 3, 1964 the claimant suffered a fall which was a compensable accident. On September 29, 1964 she fell through a hole in a floor up to her mid-legs, and this also was determined to be a compensable accident against the same employer and carrier. The board reopened the latter accident (fall through floor) upon the basis of a physician’s medical report *“*indicating claimant has marked anxiety, low back pain, weakness of right hand muscles, stiffness of fingers and shoulder pain” (board order of restoral). It appears that the primary issue litigated in the hearings before the Referee was the question of a schedule loss based on causally related injuries to the right arm and shoulder. The Referee eventually held that there was no causally related disability to the right arm or shoulder, but nevertheless awarded benefits for causally related disability during a period of time when the claimant was being treated by a Doctor Millheiser. The board has found that the claimant did have a causally related disabling condition in her back during the period of Dr. Millheiser’s treatments and affirmed the Referee’s award of benefits. Although the testimony of Dr. Millheiser before the Referee *1079was oriented primarily toward the question of disability in the claimant’s right arm and shoulder, the record contains sufficient medical reports and testimony by the claimant as to the manner of the happening of the accident and the injuries sustained to support the finding of the board that the claimant did have a continuing causally related disabling condition of her back. There is also testimony at the time of the first accident that there was a “ sprain of the right side of the body ” of the claimant. The attending physician following the second accident noted that the claimant complained of severe pain *inter alia,*in the shoulder and that he treated her with physical therapy and at that time (Jan. 18, 1965) asked to have the case reopened for further treatment. The record in its entirety contains substantial evidence to support the decision of the board. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Greenblott, Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur in memorandum by Herlihy, P. J.
#### § 1017.30 Criminal penalty.

Any person who violates section 148 of the Atomic Energy Act or any regulation or order of the Secretary issued under section 148 of the Atomic Energy Act, including these regulations, may be subject to a criminal penalty under section 223 of the Atomic Energy Act (42 U.S.C. 2273). In such case, the Secretary shall refer the matter to the Attorney General for investigation and possible prosecution.

[73 FR 32641, June 10, 2008, as amended at 81 FR 41796, June 28, 2016; 81 FR 96353, Dec. 30, 2016]
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, John Isbrandtsen, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K/A of Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2012-6 (the "Exchange Act periodic
    reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
    in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
    disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
    fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
    material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K/A.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    Cenlar, FSB as Servicer, First Republic Bank as Servicer, PHH Mortgage
    Corporation as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Custodian and Wells
    Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master Servicer and Securities Administrator.

    Dated:   June 27, 2013


    /s/ John Isbrandtsen
    Signature

    Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
```

[109th Congress Public Law 297]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ297.109]

[[Page 120 STAT. 1471]]

Public Law 109-297
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
      To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a 
     hydroelectric project in the State of Alaska. <<NOTE: Oct. 5, 
                           2006 -  [S. 176]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION 
            PROJECT.

    Notwithstanding the time period specified in section 13 of the 
Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project numbered 11480, the 
Commission may, at the request of the licensee for the project, and 
after reasonable notice, in accordance with the good faith, due 
diligence, and public interest requirements of that section and the 
Commission's procedures under that section extend the time period during 
which the licensee is required to commence the construction of the 
project for 3 consecutive 2-year periods beyond the date that is 4 years 
after the date of issuance of the license.

    Approved October 5, 2006.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 176:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 109-681 (Comm. on Energy and Commerce).
SENATE REPORTS: No. 109-29 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 151 (2005):
                                    July 26, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.
                                                        Vol. 152 (2006):
                                    Sept. 26, considered and passed 
                                        House.

                                  <all>
```
§ 1040.89-5 Complaints. ( a ) Any person, individually or as a member of a class or on behalf of others, may file a written complaint with DOE alleging discrimination prohibited by the Act or these regulations. A complainant must file a complaint within 180 days from the date he/she first had knowledge of the alleged act of discrimination. For good cause shown, however, the Director, Office of Civil Rights and Diversity, may extend the time limit for filing a complaint. Complaints may be submitted to Field Civil Rights Officers located in DOE's field offices or to the Director, Office of Civil Rights and Diversity, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, D.C. 20585.
( b ) The Director, Office of Civil Rights and Diversity, will attempt to facilitate the filing of complaints wherever possible, including taking the following measures: ( 1 ) Accepting as a sufficient complaint any written statement which identifies the parties involved and the date the complainant first had knowledge of the alleged violation, describes generally the action or practice complained of, and is signed by the complainant.
( 2 ) Freely permitting a complainant to add information to the complaint to meet the requirements of a sufficient complaint.
( 3 ) Widely disseminating information regarding the obligations of recipients under the Act and these regulations.
( 4 ) Notifying the complainant and the recipient of their rights and obligations under the complaint procedure, including the right to have a representative at all stages of the complaint procedure.
( 5 ) Notifying the complainant and the recipient (or their representatives) of their right to contact DOE for information and assistance regarding the complaint resolution process.
( c ) The Director, Office of Civil Rights and Diversity, will refer any complaint outside the jurisdiction of DOE to the proper Federal department or agency and will also notify the complainant and the recipient of the referral. The notification will contain an explanation for the referral and the name, telephone number, and address of the Federal department or agency office having jurisdiction over the matter complained.
[50 FR 8089, Feb. 27, 1985, as amended at 68 FR 51348, Aug. 26, 2003]
647.305-71 Shipping instructions.       The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 652.247–71, Shipping Instructions, in solicitations and contracts with a source in the United States if overseas shipment of supplies is required.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 647.3—Transportation in Supply Contracts
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 42


### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 07/14 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 14 Jul 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL
#### Ben Goldstein, Appellant, v Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Croton-on-Hudson, Respondent, and Maurice Kratter et al., Intervenors-Respondents.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of *539Croton-on-Hudson, dated July 11, 1979, denying petitioner’s application for a variance from the frontage and access requirements of the village zoning ordinance and for an exception from the requirements of section 7-736 of the Village Law, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated February 5, 1980, which denied the relief sought and dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed, with one bill of costs payable jointly to respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs. Appellant sought an exception and variance from the access and frontage provisions of section 7-736 (formerly section 179-o) of the Village Law and sections 8.1.2 and 13.1 of the Village of Croton-on-Hudson Zoning Ordinance. His application was denied and Special Term dismissed his CPLR article 78 petition on the merits. We affirm. The proposed structures, on seven lots of appellant's amended subdivision plan, would not front on any public road or street. Access to the proposed structures would be from Hessian Hills Road (a public road) via easement and fee rights in two private driveways which dead end at their termini inside the subdivision and do not contain cul-de-sacs. The zoning board of appeals stated (with support in the record) that Hessian Hills Road is itself an inadequate road. On the basis of all the evidence, we conclude that appellant has not. sustained his burden of proof establishing practical difficulty or undue hardship. The board’s decision was not illegal, arbitrary or an abuse of discretion, and has a rational basis supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, Special Term was correct in dismissing the petition (see *Matter of Fuhst v Foley,*45 NY2d 441). Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Mangano and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

 _______________________________

DUVAL JONES, #189 486 *

Petitioner, *

v. * 2:06-CV-720-WHA

JERRY FERRELL, WARDEN, et al., *

Respondents. *

 _______________________________

ORDER ON MOTION

Upon consideration of Petitioner’s Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis

(Doc. No. 2), and for good cause, it is

ORDERED that the motion be and is hereby GRANTED.

Done, this 18th day of August, 2006.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00720-WHA-SRW Document 3 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/07/2006 Page 1 of 11
Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/07/2006 Page 2 of 11
Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/07/2006 Page 3 of 11
Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/07/2006 Page 4 of 11
Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/07/2006 Page 5 of 11
Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/07/2006 Page 6 of 11
Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/07/2006 Page 7 of 11
Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/07/2006 Page 8 of 11
Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/07/2006 Page 9 of 11
Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/07/2006 Page 10 of 11
Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/07/2006 Page 11 of 11
exv4w10











EXHIBIT 4.10




ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SUBSCRIPTION




GENERAL FINANCE CORPORATION

ATTENTION: CHRISTOPHER A. WILSON

39 EAST UNION STREET

PASADENA, CALIFORNIA 91103




Dear Subscriber:



Please sign below to acknowledge receipt of the prospectus and to convert your preliminary
subscription to a final and binding subscription. Please enclose a check payable to “General
Finance Corporation” in the amount of $___ multiplied by the number of Units you intend to
subscribe for.



A stock certificate and warrant purchased in each Unit, which consists of one share of common stock
and a three-year warrant to purchase 0.5 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $4.00, will
be issued to you as soon as possible upon the Company’s acceptance of your subscription, as
described in the prospectus dated ___, 2010. In the event that the offering is cancelled, your
subscription funds will be returned to you as described in the prospectus.




Very Truly Yours,




	 	 	 	 	 
	GENERAL FINANCE CORPORATION

 	 	 
	By:  	 	 	 
	 	Christopher A. Wilson 	 	 
	 	General Counsel 	 	 
	 



                                                            

Date



By signing below, I acknowledge the receipt of the prospectus dated ___, 2010 of General Finance
Corporation and convert the preliminary subscription agreement to a final subscription agreement,
which will be binding and irrevocable until the expiration date as defined in the prospectus.



The undersigned encloses $                     for the purchase of                      Units, at the purchase price of $    
     
per Unit.




                                                            

Signature




                                                            

Print Name




                                                            

Date
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Authority:

7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 800.150 Maintenance and retention of records on fee schedules.

Agencies, contractors, and approved scale testing organizations shall maintain complete records on fee schedules. These records consist of (a) a copy of the current fee schedule; (b) in the case of an agency, data showing how the fees in the schedule were developed; (c) superseded fee schedules; and (d) related information required by the Service. These records shall be maintained for 5 years.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0580-0011)