alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)

I, Rod Lynam, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Gallery of
History, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.


Date:  February 13, 2004

                                /s/  ROD LYNAM
                                _______________________
                                Rod Lynam
                                Chief Financial Officer
Case 1:06-cv-00703-MHT-CSC Document 38 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00703-MHT-CSC Document 38 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 2 of 2
162 So.2d 15

#### UNITED GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY v. Onie Martin NEZAT et vir.

No. 47187.

April 2, 1964.

In re: United Gas Pipe Line Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of St. Landry. 160 So.2d 367.

Writ denied. No error of law under the facts found by the Court of Appeal.

McCALEB, J., is of the opinion that a writ should be granted.
#### Edward J. Dyman, Appellant, v City of Utica et al., Defendants, and Rocco De Paul et al., Respondents.

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated at Special Term, Murphy, J. (Appeal from order of Oneida Supreme Court—dismiss complaint.) Present—Simons, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Callahan and Moule, JJ.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I,William A. Owen, certify that:

1. Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Outdoor ChannelHoldings, Inc.;

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial informationincluded in this report fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant andhave:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: February 12, 2007 | /s/ William A. Owen                          |   |
|-------------------------|----------------------------------------------|--------|
| ** **              | **William A. Owen**, Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

----
H. Res. 1053

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 29, 2006.

Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule 

XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to the House 

is waived with respect to any resolution reported on the legislative day of September 29, 2006. 

Attest:

Clerk.
Subpart 5134.0 - General

5134.003 Responsibilities.

Parent topic: Part 5134 - Major System Acquisition
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3030 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3030

 To extend the period for unemployment compensation under the Katrina 
                   Emergency Assistance Act of 2006.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 24, 2006

 Ms. Landrieu (for herself, Mr. Lieberman, and Mr. Kennedy) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
             on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the period for unemployment compensation under the Katrina 
                   Emergency Assistance Act of 2006.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION.

    Section 2 of the Katrina Emergency Assistance Act of 2006 (Public 
Law 109-176) is amended by striking ``39'' and inserting ``52''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Felker *v.*City of Monroe.

July 15, 1913.

Action for damages. Before Judge Hammond. Walton superior court. February 21, 1912.

*J. H. 'Felher,*for plaintiff. *B. L.*Cox, for defendant.

Beck, J.

1. While the declaration in this case is inartifically drawn and does not clearly and distinctly allege any amount of damages as the result of the taking of petitioner’s property, it does in general terms allege that the plaintiff was damaged in a certain amount per annum by reason of the construction of a sewer through his land along a route different from that on the line of which he had consented for the city to construct it; and that in consequence of the unauthorized change in the location of the sewer the plaintiff had been damaged. There was some evidence from which the jury would have been authorized to find that the city had constructed the sewer along the route not authorized in the plaintiff’s agreement with the city; and that being true, the court should not'- have granted a nonsuit, but should have submitted to the jury .the question of damages resulting to the plaintiff.

2. If as a matter of fact the plaintiff had consented for the city to construct a sewer upon one line through his property, the city could not altogether defeat, a recovery of damages in case it actually constructed the sewer along a different line through the plaintiff’s land, although the construction of the sewer along the latter line did not cause any greater damage than if it had been constructed along the line agreed upon between the plaintiff and the city.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
#### In the Matter of Foreclosure of 2001 Tax Liens by Proceeding In Rem Pursuant to Article 11 of Real Property Tax Law by County of Jefferson, Respondent; Robert Weichert, Appellant.

Submitted August 6, 2007;

decided October 16, 2007

Reported below, 38 AD3d 1364.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed as untimely *(see*CPLR 5513 [b]).
#### § 925.31 Compensation and expenses.

The members of the committee, and alternates when acting as members, shall serve without compensation but may be reimbursed for expenses necessarily incurred by them in the performance of their duties under this part: *Provided,* That the committee at its discretion may request the attendance of one or more alternates at any or all meetings notwithstanding the expected or actual presence of the respective members and may pay expenses as aforesaid.
§ 981.481 Interest and late payment charges. ( a ) Pursuant to § 981.81(e), the Board shall impose an interest charge on any handler whose assessment payment has not been received in the Board's office within 30 days of the invoice date shown on the handler's statement, unless an envelope containing the payment has been legibly postmarked by the U.S. Postal Service or some other verifiable delivery tracking system as having been remitted within 30 days of the invoice date. The interest charge shall be a rate of one and one-half percent per month and shall be applied to the unpaid assessment balance for the number of days all or any part of the unpaid balance is delinquent beyond the 30-day payment period.
( b ) In addition to the interest charge specified in paragraph (a) of this section, the Board shall impose a late payment charge on any handler whose payment has not been received in the Board's office within 60 days of the invoice date, unless an envelope containing the payment has been legibly postmarked by the U.S. Postal Service or some other verifiable delivery tracking system as having been remitted within 60 days of the invoice date. The late payment charge shall be 10 percent of the unpaid balance.
[88 FR 67267, Oct. 2, 2023, as amended at 88 FR 82235, Nov. 24, 2023]
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intervoice, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended May 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David W.
Brandenburg, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




Date:         July 22, 2003
                                         /s/ David W. Brandenburg
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         David W. Brandenburg
                                         Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
Case 2:06-cv-00719-WKW-WC Document 19 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00719-WKW-WC Document 19 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00719-WKW-WC Document 19 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00719-WKW-WC Document 19 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 4 of 4
# 1.9002 Contract document approval signature routing procedures.

Procedures are located in DARS PGI 1.9002.

**Parent topic:**SUBPART 1.90 — PROCUREMENT OVERSIGHT
###### Editorial Note on Subpart A of Part 989

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 989 appear at 83 FR 53973, Oct. 26, 2018.

#### §§ 989.65-989.72 [Reserved]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3208 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3208

     To suspend temporarily the duty on Methoxycarbonyl-terminated 
            perfluorinated polyoxymethylene-polyoxyethylene.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

Mr. Lautenberg introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the duty on Methoxycarbonyl-terminated 
            perfluorinated polyoxymethylene-polyoxyethylene.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. METHOXYCARBONYL-TERMINATED PERFLUORINATED POLYOXYMETHYLENE-
              POLYOXYETHYLENE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.39.20        Methoxycarbonyl-        Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           terminated                                                        31/2009          ''
                           perfluorinated                                                                      .
                           polyoxymethylene-
                           polyoxyethylene (CAS
                           No. 107852-49-3)
                           (provided for in
                           subheading
                           3907.20.00)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 7.17 Remedial measures. ( a ) FSA will consider additional efforts to achieve the objective that county committees are fairly representative of farmers and ranchers within areas covered by the committees. Such efforts may include, but are not limited to, compliance reviews of selected counties, further centralization of the election process, and the appointment of socially disadvantaged farmers and ranchers to particular committees in accordance with a notice published in the Federal Register issued by the Secretary authorizing such appointments.
( b ) The Secretary may ensure inclusion of socially disadvantaged farmers and ranchers by appointment of 1 additional voting member to a county committee when a significant population of socially disadvantaged farmers and ranchers exist in the committee jurisdiction and no member is elected from that socially disadvantaged population. The appointment of the socially disadvantaged voting member will be in accordance with standards and qualifications furnished by the State committee.
**Exhibit31.1**

**CERTIFICATION***

I, Perry T. Massie, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly reporton Form 10-Q/A of Outdoor Channel Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements and other financial information included in this report fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

4. The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date: February 12, 2007 | /s/ Perry T. Massie                          |   |
|-------------------------|----------------------------------------------|--------|
| ** **              | **Perry T. Massie**, Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
#### Anne Enker, Appellant, v. Slattery Construction Co., Inc., et al., Respondents.

In this action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, 'Kings County, dated July 18, 1969, which denied her motion for partial summary judgment, pursuant to CPLR 3212. Plaintiff sought summary judgment that defendants were negligent, and that the issues of plaintiff’s contributory negligence and her damages be severed and reserved for trial. Order affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. We find that Special Term properly denied plaintiff’s motion for the reasons stated in its decision. Moreover, we find that the partial summary judgment sought by plairitiff could not have been' granted for the additional reason that CPLR 3212 (subd. [b]) provides: “The motion shall be denied if any party shall show facts sufficient to require a trial of any issue of fact other than an issue as to the amount or the extent of the damages ”. Here, plaintiff concedes there is an issue of fact as to her contributory negligence. Aside from the foregoing statute which proscribes the severance of the issues of negligence and contributory negligence in a personal injury, action, we find no useful purpose could be served by a partial summary judgment severing for trial the issue of plaintiff’s contributory negligence, assuming it could have been determined that defendants must be found negligent as a matter of law in this case. Negligence and contributory negligence overlap and are interrelated in a personal injury case. The causal connection between a defendant’s negligence and a plaintiff’s contributory negligence is a primary issue therein. A trial as to plaintiff’s contributory negligence herein necessarily involves a consideration of defendants’ negligence by the court, or court and jury, which might ultimately try this case (cf. *Harold Ohringer Inc.*v. *Kass,*28 A D 2d 1117; *Schwartz*v. *New England Mut. Life Ins. Co.,*20 A D 2d 688). Christ, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Munder and Brennan, JJ., concur.