alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          19,798
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             451
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     68,890
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        401,631
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,361
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 513,978
<DEPOSITS>                                     423,077
<SHORT-TERM>                                    11,414
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             22,404
<LONG-TERM>                                      2,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,519
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,564
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 513,978
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 25,957
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,205
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   263
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                29,425
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              11,406
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,701
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           16,724
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      683
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (8)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,588
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,068
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       5,353
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,353
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.19
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   5.167
<LOANS-NON>                                        931
<LOANS-PAST>                                       403
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   554
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    517
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,400
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      904
<RECOVERIES>                                       182
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,361
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,361
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

GREGORY SCOTT, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

vs. ) Case No.: 2:06-CV-00654-MEF 

 ) 

NORMENT SECURITY GROUP, ) 

INC., ) 

 ) 

 Defendant. ) 

CORPORATE/CONFLICT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 

 In accordance with the order of this Court, the undersigned party or parties to the 

above-captioned matter do hereby make the following disclosure concerning parent 

companies, subsidiaries, affiliates, partnership, joint ventures, debtor, creditors’ 

committee, or other entities reportable under the provisions of the Middle District of 

Alabama’s General Order No. 3047: 

 The following entities are hereby reported: 

 Compudyne Corporation 

 Tiburon, Inc. 

 Fiber Senys, Inc. 

Dated: June 14, 2007 s/ Bruce J. Downey, III__________

 BRUCE J. DOWNEY, III 

 Attorney for Defendant 

 Norment Security Group, Inc. 

Case 2:06-cv-00654-MEF-WC Document 20 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 1 of 2
OF COUNSEL

CAPELL & HOWARD, P.C. 

150 South Perry Street (36104) 

Post Office Box 2069 

Montgomery, Alabama 36102-2069 

Telephone: (334) 241-8000 

Facsimile: (334) 323-8888 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that on June 14, 2007 I electronically filed the foregoing with the 

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing 

to the following: 

Braxton Schell, Jr., Esq. 

BRAXTON SCHELL, JR., P.C. 

1330 21st Way South, Suite 210 

Birmingham, Alabama 35205 

 /s Bruce J. Downey, III___________

 Of Counsel 

Case 2:06-cv-00654-MEF-WC Document 20 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

M IDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABA M A

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

 DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

 April 26, 2007

NOTICE OF CORRECTION

 

FROM: Clerk’s Office

Case Style: Owens J. Rogal v. Skilstaff, Inc.

Case No.: 3:06cv711-MHT 

Documents 41 and 42

This Notice of Correction was filed in the referenced case this date to enter the

corrected signature pages into the record for these two documents.

Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 49 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 49 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 49-2 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 1 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 49-2 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 2 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 49-2 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 3 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 49-2 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 4 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 49-2 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 5 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 49-2 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 6 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 49-3 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 1 of 15
Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 49-3 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 2 of 15
Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 49-3 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 3 of 15
Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 49-3 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 4 of 15
Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 49-3 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 5 of 15
Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 49-3 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 6 of 15
Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 49-3 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 7 of 15
Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 49-3 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 8 of 15
Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 49-3 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 9 of 15
Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 49-3 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 10 of 15
Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 49-3 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 11 of 15
Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 49-3 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 12 of 15
Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 49-3 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 13 of 15
Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 49-3 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 14 of 15
Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 49-3 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 15 of 15
SUBCHAPTER E - GENERAL CONTRACTING

REQUIREMENTS

PART 327 - PATENTS, DATA, AND COPYRIGHTS

PART 328 [RESERVED]

PART 330 - COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

PART 331 - CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES

PART 332 - CONTRACT FINANCING

PART 333 - PROTESTS, DISPUTES, AND APPEALS

PART 327 - PATENTS, DATA, AND COPYRIGHTS

Subpart 327.3 - Patent Rights Under Government Contracts

327.303 Solicitation provision and contract clause.

Subpart 327.4 - Rights in Data and Copyrights

327.404-70 Solicitation provision and contract clause.

327.409 Solicitation provision and contract clause.

PART 328 [RESERVED]

PART 330 - COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

Subpart 330.2 - CAS Program Requirements

330.201 Contract requirements.

330.201-5 Waiver.

PART 331 - CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES

Subpart 331.1 - Applicability

331.101-70 Salary rate limitation.

PART 332 - CONTRACT FINANCING

Subpart 332.4 - Advance Payments for Non-Commercial Items

332.402 General.

332.407 Interest.

Subpart 332.5 - Progress Payments Based on Cost

332.501 General.

332.501-2 Unusual progress payments.

Subpart 332.7 - Contract Funding

332.702 Policy.

332.703 Contract funding requirements.

332.703-1 General.

332.703-71 Incrementally funded cost-reimbursement contracts.

332.703-72 Incremental Funding Table.

332.706 Solicitation provision and contract clauses.

332.706-2 Provision and clauses for limitation of cost or funds.

Subpart 332.70 - Electronic Submission and Processing of Payment Requests

332.7000 Scope of subpart.

332.7001 Definitions.

332.7002 Policy.

332.7003 Contract clause.

PART 333 - PROTESTS, DISPUTES, AND APPEALS

Subpart 333.1 - Protests

333.102 General.

333.103 Protests to the agency.
Subpart 333.2 - Disputes and Appeals

333.203 Applicability.

333.209 Suspected fraudulent claims.

333.215-70 Contract clauses.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2942 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Black 1334. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 23, 2006 

Mr. CARPER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Black 1334. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BLACK 1334. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.32.08 Black 1334 (provided for in 

subheading 3215.11.00) ...... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•S 2942 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                                      38,275,251
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               94,628,596
<ALLOWANCES>                                 7,893,664
<INVENTORY>                                 30,807,806
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           173,548,471
<PP&E>                                      70,514,740
<DEPRECIATION>                              31,151,173
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             320,669,917
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       68,488,266
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,011
<OTHER-SE>                                 102,192,447
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               320,669,917
<SALES>                                    201,971,807
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           201,971,807
<CGS>                                       97,928,708
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               97,928,708
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               225,192
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,558,726
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (18,084,137)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,646,300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (22,730,437)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (22,730,437)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.76)


</TABLE>
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 

) 3:06cr191-MHT

SPRING M. DAWSON )

)

ORDER

This case is now before the court on defendant Spring

M. Dawson’s motion to continue trial. In light of the

fact that the government has no objections to the

continuance motion and for the reasons set forth below,

the court concludes that the continuance motion should be

granted.

While the granting of a continuance is left to the

sound discretion of the trial judge, United States v.

Stitzer, 785 F.2d 1506, 1516 (11th Cir.), cert. denied,

479 U.S. 823 (1986), the court is limited by the

requirements of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 3161.

The Act provides in part:

Case 3:06-cr-00191-MHT-CSC Document 18 Filed 01/16/2007 Page 1 of 3
2

“In any case in which a plea of not

guilty is entered, the trial of a

defendant charged in an ... indictment

with the commission of an offense shall

commence within seventy days from the

filing date (and making public) of the

... indictment, or from the date the

defendant has appeared before a judicial

officer of the court in which such

charge is pending, whichever date last

occurs.” 

18 U.S.C.A. § 3161(c)(1). The Act excludes from the 70-

day period any continuance based on “findings that the

ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the

best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy

trial.” § 3161(h)(8)(A). In granting such a continuance,

the court may consider, among other factors, whether the

failure to grant the continuance “would deny counsel for

the defendant ... the reasonable time necessary for

effective preparation.” § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv).

The court concludes that, in this case, a continuance

is necessary because Dawson seeks pretrial diversion and

is in the process of obtaining the necessary documents to

request pretrial diversion. Thus, the ends of justice

Case 3:06-cr-00191-MHT-CSC Document 18 Filed 01/16/2007 Page 2 of 3
served by granting a continuance outweigh the interest of

the public and Dawson in a speedy trial. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:

(1) Defendant Spring M. Dawson’s motion to continue

(Doc. No. 17) is granted.

(2) Defendant Dawson’s trial and jury selection are

continued to the criminal term of court

commencing June 4, 2007, at 10:00 a.m., in

Courtroom 2FMJ of the Frank M. Johnson Jr.

United States Courthouse Complex, One Church

Street, Montgomery, Alabama.

DONE, this the 16th day of January, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:06-cr-00191-MHT-CSC Document 18 Filed 01/16/2007 Page 3 of 3
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

) 

V. ) CR. NO. 3:06cr191-MHT

)

SPRING M. DAWSON )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the Motion for Leave to Dismiss Indictment without

Prejudice (doc. no. 25) heretofore filed in the above styled cause, and for good cause

shown, the Court is of the opinion that the motion should be and the same hereby is

granted. It is, therefore, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by

the Court that said motion be and the same is hereby granted.

DONE, this the 30th day of August, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cr-00191-MHT-CSC Document 26 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 1 of 1
Editorial Note on Subpart A of Part 989
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 989 appear at 83 FR 53973, Oct. 26, 2018.

§ 989.73 Reports. ( a ) *Inventory reports.* Each handler shall, upon request of the Committee, file promptly with the Committee a certified report, showing such information as the Committee shall specify with respect to any raisins which were held by him on a date designated by the Committee, which information as specified may include, but not be limited to: ( 1 ) The quantity of any raisins so held, segregated as to varietal type, natural condition, packed, standard quality or off-grade quality; and
( 2 ) The locations of the raisins.
( b ) *Acquisition reports.* Each handler shall submit to the Committee in accordance with such rules and procedures as are prescribed by the Committee, with the approval of the Secretary, certified reports, for such periods as the Committee may require, with respect to his acquisitions of each varietal type of raisins during the particular period covered by such report, which report shall include, but not be limited to: ( 1 ) The total quantity of standard raisins acquired;
( 2 ) The total quantity of off-grade raisins acquired pursuant to § 989.58(e)(1)(i); and
( 3 ) Cumulative totals of such acquisitions from the beginning of the then current crop year to and including the end of the period for which the report is made. Upon written application made to the Committee, a handler may be relieved of submitting such reports after completing his packing operations for the season. Upon request of the Committee, each handler shall furnish to the Committee, in such manner and at such times as it may require, the name and address of each person from whom he acquired raisins and the quantity of each varietal type of raisins acquired from each such person.
( c ) Each handler shall file such reports of creditable promotion including paid advertising as recommended by the Committee and approved by the Secretary.
( d ) *Other reports.* Upon the request of the Committee, with the approval of the Secretary, each handler shall furnish to the Committee such other information as may be necessary to enable it to exercise its powers and perform its duties under this amended part.
[25 FR 12813, Dec. 14, 1960, as amended at 32 FR 12164, Aug. 24, 1967; 32 FR 18086, Dec. 19, 1967; 48 FR 32978, July 20, 1983; 83 FR 53971, Oct. 26, 2018]
#### § 1022.24 Interagency cooperation.

If DOE and one or more agencies are directly involved in a proposed floodplain or wetland action, in accordance with DOE's NEPA or CERCLA procedures, DOE shall consult with such other agencies to determine if a floodplain or wetland assessment is required by subpart B of this part, identify the appropriate lead or joint agency responsibilities, identify the applicable regulations, and establish procedures for interagency coordination during the environmental review process.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3504 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.3504

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and six

                                 An Act

 
 To amend the Public Health Service Act to prohibit the solicitation or 
 acceptance of tissue from fetuses gestated for research purposes, and 
                           for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fetus Farming Prohibition Act of 
2006''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF THE SOLICITATION OR ACCEPTANCE OF TISSUE FROM 
              FETUSES GESTATED FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES.

    Section 498B of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 289g-2) is 
amended--
        (1) by redesignating subsections (c) and (d) as subsections (d) 
    and (e), respectively;
        (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following:
    ``(c) Solicitation or Acceptance of Tissue From Fetuses Gestated 
for Research Purposes.--It shall be unlawful for any person or entity 
involved or engaged in interstate commerce to--
        ``(1) solicit or knowingly acquire, receive, or accept a 
    donation of human fetal tissue knowing that a human pregnancy was 
    deliberately initiated to provide such tissue; or
        ``(2) knowingly acquire, receive, or accept tissue or cells 
    obtained from a human embryo or fetus that was gestated in the 
    uterus of a nonhuman animal.'';
        (3) in paragraph (1) of subsection (d), as so redesignated, by 
    striking ``(a) or (b)'' and inserting ``(a), (b), or (c)''; and
        (4) in paragraph (1) of subsection (e), as so redesignated, by 
    striking ``section 498A(f)'' and inserting ``section 498A(g)''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

OWEN J. ROGAL, D.D.S., P.C., )

d/b/a THE PAIN CENTER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06cv728-VPM

) [WO]

SKILSTAF, INC., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER ON MOTION

This case was transferred to this district from the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on

14 August 2006 (Doc. #13). On 29 November 2005, well before the transfer, the defendant

filed a Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiff’s Complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Fed. R.

Civ. Pro. and on other grounds (Doc. # 3). The motion is a dispositive motion, the favorable

conclusion of which would end the litigation. Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED that on or before 18 September 2006, the parties shall notify the Clerk of

the court whether they wish to consent to the Magistrate Judge in writing by sending a

completed consent form to the Clerk of the court. A copy of the form is enclosed for a

party's use. The parties are ADVISED that they may freely decline to consent without

adverse consequences.

DONE this 7 day of September, 2006. th

/s/ Vanzetta Penn McPherson

VANZETTA PENN MCPHERSON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 19 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

________________ DIVISION

____________________________, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) 

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 

) 

_____________________________, )

 )

Defendant. )

CONSENT TO JURISDICTION BY A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

In accordance with the provisions of Title 28, U.S.C. § 636(c), the undersigned party

or parties to the above-captioned civil matter who previously have indicated their consent to

the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge of this Court, hereby confirm in writing their consent

to a United States Magistrate Judge conducting any and all further proceedings in the case,

including trial, and ordering the entry of a final judgment.

____________________ __________________________________________

DATE SIGNATURE

_________________________________________

COUNSEL FOR (print name of all parties)

_________________________________________

ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE

_________________________________________

TELEPHONE NUMBER

Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 19 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 2 of 2