alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Biven s v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau o f 1 

### Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). ___________ No. 95-2479

___________ Melvin Anderson, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United State s
v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. R.H. Rison, Warden, USMCFP, * Springfield, MO; S.D. Paciorek; * [UNPUBLISHED] G. Klingingner, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: July 16, 1996 Filed: July 26, 1996

___________ Before BEAM, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.
Melvin Anderson, a federal prisoner, appeals from the distric t court's order denying Anderson leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) an d dismissing without prejudice his complaint alleging violations of his civi l rights i n this Bivens action. We reverse and remand for furthe r 1 proceedings.
Anders on alleged that federal prison officials and physician s unl awfullydetained him in the United States Medical Center for Federa l Prisoners at Springfield (USMCFP), placed him ina seclusion stripped cell for fou r days which was lighted twenty-four hours a day and had a vide o camera, and placed him in a four-point restraint , seized blood, and forcefed him without his consent for

### -2-

the purp ose of punishing him and murdering him. As part of an initia l review under 28 U.S.C . § 1915(d), the magistrate judge ordered defendants to show cause why leave to proceed IFP should be denied.

Inresponse, defendants submitted affidavits from a USMCFP staf f attorney and physician attesting to the circumst ances under which Anderson was transferred, placed in a seclusion cell, for ce-fed, and restrained for the purpose of admini stering medical tests. The district court concluded Anderson's claims were frivolous, denied him leave to proceed IFP, an d dismissed the complaint without prejudice.
We conclude that the district court acted improperly when it ordered def endants to show cause why IFP status should be denied, and the n considered (and credited) documentary evidence a nd affidavits submitted in respon se, to determine whether Anderson's claims were frivolous. A decisionto grant leave to proceed IFP is to be decided initially on the basis of the complaint; if the complaint is frivolous, it should b e dismissed out of hand. Gentile v. Missouri Dep't of Corrections & Human Resource s , 986 F.2d 214, 217 (8th Cir. 1993). If the complaint is no t frivolous or malicious, IFP status should be granted, and process issued and serve d. Id. The complaint did not contain "claim[s] based on a n indispu tablymeritless legal theory" or present "claims whose factua l contentions [were] clearly baseless." Neitzke v Williams , 490 U.S. 319, 327 (8th Cir. 1992). Accordingly, we conclude the distric t court abused its discretion in denyin g Anderson leave to proceed IFP, and dismissing without prejudic e Ander son's complaint. See Denton v. Hernandez , 504 U.S. 25, 33 (1992 ) (stan dard of review). In light of our disposition of this appeal , Anderson's motion for production of documents is moot.

### -3- A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6006

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RAYMONT ANTHONY HIGGS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:04-cr-00867-CMC-1; 

3:16-cv-02424-CMC)

Submitted: May 17, 2018 Decided: May 18, 2018

Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raymont Anthony Higgs, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Raymont Anthony Higgs seeks to appeal the district court’s order construing his 

postjudgment motion as a successive and unauthorized 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion

and dismissing it on that basis. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A 

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable 

jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a 

constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Higgs has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Photogen Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSBfor the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Taffy J. Williams, Ph.D.,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company

 

 
| /s/ Taffy J.  Williams    |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Taffy J.  Williams, Ph.D. |
| Chief  Executive Officer  |
| May 19, 2003              |

 

----
204-1 

RULE 204 Applications - Adopted 4/28/72, Amended 5/2/96

Every application for a permit required under Rule 201 shall be filed in the manner and form 

prescribed by the Control Officer, and shall give all the information necessary to enable the 

Control Officer to make the determination required by Rule 208 hereof.
§ 966.160 Reestablishment of districts. ( a ) District No. 1: The counties of Charlotte, Glades, Palm Beach, Lee, Hendry, Collier, Broward, Monroe, and Dade in the State of Florida.
( b ) District No. 2: The counties of Pinellas, Hillsborough, Polk, Osceola, Brevard, Manatee, Hardee, Highlands, Okeechobee, Indian River, St. Lucie, Sarasota, De Soto, and Martin in the State of Florida.
( c ) Terms used in this section have the same meaning as when used in said marketing agreement and this part.
[35 FR 19633, Dec. 25, 1970, as amended at 84 FR 50713, Sept. 26, 2019]
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

December 3, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00319

- CR

Bruce CARTER

, Appellant

v.

The Sta te o

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR3505

Honorable Ray Olivarri, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The State ’s Motion for Extension of Time to File the Brief has bee n GRANTED. Time is

extended to January 4, 2016.



### PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

____________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

CLERK OF COURT

cc: Mary Beth Welsh

Assistant Criminal District Attorney

Paul Elizondo Tower

101 W. Nueva, Suite 370

San Antonio, TX 78205 H. Todd McCray

Law Office H. Todd McCray

110 E. Nueva St.

San Antonio, TX 78204
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Fatin Johnson, Appellant.

Submitted October 22, 2007;

decided November 15, 2007

Reported below, 43 AD3d 288.

*973Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Robert S. Dean, Esq., Center for Appellate Litigation, 74 Trinity Place, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10006 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
# Subpart 1529.4 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**PART 1529 - TAXES
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1065 

Raising a question of the privilege of the House. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2006 

Ms. PELOSI submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Standards of Official Conduct 

RESOLUTION 

Raising a question of the privilege of the House. 

Whereas for more than 150 years, parents from across the 

country have sent their children to be pages in the U.S. 

Capitol, the Page School is a national treasure, and the 

children who attend it and work in the Congress are our 

special trust; 

Whereas, according to press reports, Representative Mark 

Foley (R–FL) reportedly engaged in highly inappropriate 

and explicit communications with a former underage 

page; 

Whereas these allegations were so severe that Representative 

Foley immediately resigned his seat; 

Whereas the page worked for Congressman Rodney Alexander (R–FL) and, according to press reports, RepVerDate Aug 31 2005 02:00 Oct 03, 2006 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR1065.IH HR1065

ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1065 IH 

resentative Alexander learned of the emails ‘‘10 to 11 

months ago’’ (AP, September 29, 2006); 

Whereas Rep. Alexander has said, ‘‘We also notified the 

House leadership that there might be a potential problem’’, and the Democratic leadership was not informed 

(AP, September 29, 2006); 

Whereas all Members of Congress have a responsibility to 

protect their employees, especially young pages who serve 

this institution; 

Whereas these charges demand immediate investigation, including when the emails were sent, who knew of the 

emails, whether there was a pattern of inappropriate activity by Mr. Foley involving email or other contacts with 

pages, when the Republican leadership was notified, and 

what corrective action was taken once officials learned of 

any improper activity; and 

Whereas given the serious nature of these charges, the pages, 

their parents, the public, and our colleagues must be assured that such egregious behavior is not tolerated and 

will never happen again: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That— 

2 (1) the Chairman and Ranking Member of the 

3 Committee on Standards of Official Conduct are di4 rected to immediately appoint a Subcommittee, pur5 suant to Rule 19 of the Rules of the Committee, to 

6 fully and expeditiously determine the facts connected 

7 with Representative Foley’s conduct and the re8 sponse thereto; and 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1065 IH 

1 (2) the Chairman and Ranking Minority Mem2 ber of the Committee on Standards are further di3 rected to make a preliminary report within ten days. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of The Saint James Company on Form 10-Q
      for
      the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof, I, Wayne Gronquist, Chief Executive Officer
      and
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
      1350,
      as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1.
      The
      Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




November
      18, 2008




*/s/
      Wayne Gronquist*





Wayne
      Gronquist,


Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

M IDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABA M A

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

August 31, 2006

 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT

To: All Counsel of Record

 

Re: Simmons v. Liberty National Life Insurance Company 

Civil Action No. 2:06-cv-00689-DRB

The above-styled case has been reassigned to Judge W. Harold Albritton.

Please note that the case number is now 2:06-cv-00679-(WHA). This new case number should be

used on all future correspondence and pleadings in this action.

 

Case 2:06-cv-00689-MEF-DRB Document 6 Filed 08/31/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 56 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 1 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 56 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 2 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 56 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 3 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 56 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 4 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 56 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 5 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 56 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 6 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 56 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 7 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 56 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 8 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 56 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 9 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 56 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 10 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 56 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 11 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 56 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 12 of 12
Sample ID: 5-11-10 TF A398 Lab ID: 2010004761 

### Value 0.504 0.84 28.84 28.82248276 0.001615982 566 674 30.1 106 1.838 0.9947 30.1 300 2.95 289.589 9.3 30.09 0.337 0.00061942281



### Value
272.2795606 31.90270414 -27.7 -1.303839 37 1.74455 0.001615982 97.31758751 

### Method 5 Parameter



# A3**98 Reactor C Emissions**

Pm = Pressure at orifice meter (in. Hg)

Vm = Total sample volume from dry gas meter (dcf) Total sampling time required for test (min) Tm = Absolute average dry gas meter temp (R). Ts = Stack gas absolute average temperature (R) 

# TF-A398 Reactor C6

Bws = Stack gas moisture content  p = Stack gas v elocity pressure (av g. sqrt  p - in. water) Cp = Pitot tube calibration coefficient

Ta = Sampling site ambient temperature, (°F)  H@ = Orifice meter calibration factor, (in. water) Y = Dry gas meter calibration factor Pbar = Barometric pressure, (in. Hg)

 Hav g= average orifice meter differential

Bws = fraction of gas that is moisture I = % Isokinetic variation Vm (std) = Volume of sample measured by DGM (dscf) Vs = Average stack gas v elocity Total impinger catch (ml) Vwc (std) = conv erted water v olume Total silica gel catch (ml) Vwsg (std) = conv erted silica gel water v olume



### Air Test Calculations Md = Stack gas dry molecular weight, (lb/lb-mole) Ms = Stack gas (wet) molecular weight (lb/lb-mole)

Ps = Absolute stack gas pressure (in Hg) Nozzle diameter (in) Area of Nozzle (ft^2) Vlc Volume collectedTest ID: 5-11-10 TF A398 Lab ID: 2010004761



### Value
197.1 Total ug of Fluoride in Gaseous Sample 0.0001971 Total g of Fluoride in Gaseous Sample 2078.75 Total ug of Fluoride in Particulate Sample 0.00207875 Total g of Fluoride in Particulate Sample 0.0685 Total g of Particulate 272.2795606 Vm(std) Volume of Air Sampled by DGM (dscf) 214 Tr Average Temperature of Stack During Test ( o F) 30.1 Pbar Barometric Pressure During Test (in Hg) 25.134 Area of Stack (ft2) 30.09 Ps Stack Pressure 31.90270414 Vs Velocity in Scrubber 0.001615982 Bws Moisture in Roof Emissions 48110.55396 Q Flow of A398 Reactor Emissions (acf/min) 37841.87113 Qstd Flow of A398 Reactor Emissions (dcf/min) 2270512.268 Qstd Flow of A398 Reactor Emissions (dscf/hr) 0.004 Emission Rate of Gaseous Fluoride lb F/hr 0.087 Emission Rate of Gaseous Fluoride lb F/d 0.038 Emission Rate of Particulate Fluoride lb F/hr 0.916 Emission Rate of Particulate Fluoride lb F/d **0.042** Emission Rate of Total Fluoride lb F/hr **1.258** Emission Rate of Total Particulate lb/hr 0.000723888 Emission Rate of gaseous Fluoride mg/dscf 0.007634616 Emission Rate of particulate Fluoride mg/dscf 0.251579663 Emission Rate of Particulate Matter mg/dscf



# A3**98 Reactor C Emissions TF-A**  **398 Reactor C6**

**Combined Method 5 Parameter and Analytical**
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1076 

Supporting the goals and ideas of a ‘‘National Plan Your Vacation Day’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2006 

Mr. PORTER submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideas of a ‘‘National Plan Your 

Vacation Day’’. 

Whereas vacations create long-lasting and invaluable memories for families to share; 

Whereas travel opens our minds and hearts to different cultures, places, and people; 

Whereas over 1⁄3 of employed adults in the United States reported feeling better about their jobs and feeling more 

productive upon returning from vacation; 

Whereas travel contributes significantly to the global economy, generating $1.3 trillion in economic activity every 

year in the United States, significantly contributing to 

the economy of the State of Nevada where 2⁄3 of every 

dollar spent is due to the tourism industry; 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HRES 1076 IH 

Whereas travel and tourism is among the largest 3 employers 

in 29 States and the District of Columbia, creating 7.3 

million jobs; and 

Whereas online travel companies help more than 50 million 

travelers per year easily plan and book travel accommodations by demonstrating an unwavering commitment 

to customer service and innovation: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideas of a ‘‘National 

3 Plan Your Vacation Day’’; and 

4 (2) requests the President to issue a proclama5 tion calling upon the people of the United States to 

6 observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and ac7 tivities. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
exh103fy10q2.htm


Exhibit 10.2

 



 

 

 

VIA HAND DELIVERY

 

 

December 7, 2009

 

Mr. Brad Holtzinger

MIPS Technologies, Inc.

955 E. Arques Avenue

Sunnyvale, CA  94085

 

Dear Brad,

 

This is to confirm that MIPS Technologies, Inc. is enhancing your fiscal year 2010 Performance-Based Bonus Plan for Executives as follows:

 

    1.    Guaranteed payout of 20% of your salary;

    2.    Paid out at normal time for bonus payout (typically in August);

    3.    To be paid even if you are terminated by the company prior to the time of payout; and

    4.    The bonus will not be paid, however, if you voluntarily resign prior to its payout.

 

Sincerely,

 

/s/ JOHN BOURGOIN

 

John Bourgoin
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 241 (Thursday, December 16, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78717-78718]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31610]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and 
Human Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections

[[Page 78718]]

552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant 
applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant 
applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Initial Review Group; Health, Behavior, and Context 
Subcommittee.
    Date: February 25, 2011.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military 
Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015.
    Contact Person: Michele C. Hindi-Alexander, PhD, Division of 
Scientific Review, National Institues of Health, Eunice Kennedy 
Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development, 6100 
Executive Blvd., Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20812-7510, 301-435-8382. 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7e1617101a171f12133e131f17125010171650191108"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5139383f3538303d3c113c30383d7f3f38397f363e27">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 10, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-31610 Filed 12-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 993.23 Part and subpart.

*Part* means the order regulating the handling of dried prunes produced in California, and all rules, regulations, and supplementary orders issued thereunder. This order regulating the handling of dried prunes produced in California shall be a *subpart* of such part.
#### § 923.7 Fiscal period.

*Fiscal period* is synonymous with fiscal year and means the 12-month period ending on March 31 of each year or such other period that may be approved by the Secretary pursuant to recommendations by the committee.
§ 996.30 Incoming quality standards. ( a ) All farmers stock peanuts received or acquired by a handler shall be officially inspected by the Inspection Service, and certified as to segregation, moisture content, and foreign material.
( b ) *Moisture.* Domestic and imported peanuts shall be dried to 18 percent or less prior to inspection and to 10.49 percent or less prior to storing or milling: *Provided,* That Virginia-type peanuts used for seed shall be dried to 18 percent or less prior to inspection and to 11.49 percent or less prior to storing or milling.
[67 FR 57140, Sept. 9, 2002, as amended at 68 FR 1157, Jan. 9, 2003; 70 FR 44046, Aug. 1, 2005; 81 FR 50288, Aug. 1, 2016]
Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 10 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 10 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 10 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 3 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 10-2 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 1 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 10-2 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 2 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 10-2 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 3 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 10-2 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 4 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 10-2 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 5 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 10-2 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 6 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 10-2 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 7 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 10-2 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 8 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 10-2 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 9 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 10-2 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 10 of 10