alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3266 

To suspend temporarily the duty on staple fibers of rayon, carded, combed, 

or otherwise processed. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 26, 2006 

Mr. FRIST (for Mrs. DOLE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on staple fibers of rayon, 

carded, combed, or otherwise processed. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. STAPLE FIBERS OF RAYON, CARDED, COMBED, 

4 OR OTHERWISE PROCESSED. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.55.07 Staple fibers of rayon, carded, combed, 

or otherwise processed for spinning, the 

foregoing presented in the form of top 

(provided for in subheading 5507.00.00) Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 3266 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
§ 932.55 Exemption. ( a ) The provisions of this subpart shall not be applicable to processed olives on hand on the effective date of this subpart but only if the identity of such olives is maintained and such olives are not commingled with olives processed after such effective date in the production of packaged olives. However, olives on hand on such effective date that are commingled with olives processed after such date and are used in the production of packaged olives shall be subject to all relevant provisions applicable to the handling of packaged olives.
( b ) Upon the basis of the recommendation submitted by the committee or from other available information, the Secretary may relieve from any or all requirements under this part the handling of olives in such minimum quantities, in such types of shipments, or for such specified purposes (including shipments to facilitate the conduct of marketing research and development projects established pursuant to § 932.45) as the committee with the approval of the Secretary may prescribe.
( c ) The committee, with the approval of the Secretary, shall prescribe rules, regulations, and safeguards as it may deem necessary to ensure that olives exempted under the provisions of this section are handled only as authorized.
[30 FR 12629, Oct. 2, 1965, as amended at 33 FR 11267, Aug. 8, 1968]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1906

REUBEN OLUGBENGA OKE, Petitioner,
versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U. S. Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A75-367-360) Submitted: February 5, 2007 Decided: April 4, 2007 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ralph J. DiPietro, THE LAW OFFICE OF RALPH J. DIPIETRO, PC, Hyattsville, Maryland, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, John P. Devaney, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.* None of the exceptions to the ninety-day period apply. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Reuben Olugbenga Oke, a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reopen. We deny the petition for review. We review the denial of a motion to reopen or reconsider with extreme deference and only for an abuse of discretion. Stewart v. INS , 181 F.3d 587, 595 (4th Cir. 1999). Such motions are especially disfavored “in a deportation proceeding, where, as a general matter, every delay works to the advantage of the deportable alien who wishes merely to remain in the United States.” INS v. Doherty , 502 U.S. 314, 323 (1992). A motion to reopen “must be filed no later than 90 days after the date on which the final administrative decision was rendered.” *8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2) (2006). Because Oke filed the motion to reopen beyond the ninetyday period for filing such motions, we find the Board did not abuse its discretion. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

EASTERN DIVISION 

GREAT SOUTHERN WOOD * 

PRESERVING, INC., * 

 * 

 Plaintiff, * 

 * 

v. * Civil No. 1:06-cv-00708-CSC 

 * 

AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE * 

CO., AIG, AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL * 

UNDERWRITERS CORP., AMERICAN * 

INTERNATIONAL MARINE AGENCY, * 

 * 

 Defendants. * 

MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING

 Come now Defendants and hereby move this Court to reschedule the hearing on 

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. By Order dated July 25, 2007, the Court set a 

hearing on Defendants’ motion and set the hearing for August 3, 2007. 

 Counsel will be in California for depositions in this case on August 2, 2007 and will be 

traveling on August 3, 2007. The undersigned has conferred with counsel for Plaintiff and 

Plaintiff consents to the continuance. 

/s/ Louis C. Norvell . 

BLANE H. CRUTCHFIELD (CRUTB4243) 

LOUIS C. NORVELL (NORVL4585) 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

 American Home Assurance Company, AIG, 

 American International Underwriters Corporation, 

 and American International Marine Agency 

OF COUNSEL: 

HAND ARENDALL, L.L.C. 

Post Office Box 123 

Mobile, AL 36601-0123 

lnorvell@handarendall.com 

Case 1:06-cv-00708-CSC Document 30 Filed 07/26/2007 Page 1 of 2
652628_1 2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that I have on this 26th day of July, 2007 served the foregoing pleading 

on counsel of record via electronic notice or by United States mail first class, postage prepaid. 

Kenneth A. Dowdy, Esq. 

Lusk, Lusk, Dowdy & Caldwell, P.C. 

2101 Highland Ave. 

Suite 410 

Birmingham, AL 35205 

Leslie Ann Caldwell, Esq. 

Lusk, Lusk, Dowdy & Caldwell, P.C. 

2101 Highland Ave. 

Suite 410 

Birmingham, AL 35205 

 s/Louis C. Norvell_________________ 

Case 1:06-cv-00708-CSC Document 30 Filed 07/26/2007 Page 2 of 2
§ 1010.201 Purpose and scope. ( a ) This subpart sets forth criteria for the types of communications on scientific or technological matters permitted under 18 U.S.C. 207(j)(5) by defining the term “scientific or technological information.” This subpart also establishes the procedures for receiving and approving requests from former employees of the executive branch to make such communications to DOE.
( b ) This subpart applies to any former employee of the executive branch subject to the post-employment conflict of interest restrictions in 18 U.S.C. 207(a), (c), and (d), who wishes to communicate with DOE under the exemption in 18 U.S.C. 207(j)(5) for the purpose of furnishing scientific or technological information to DOE offices or officials.
( c ) This subpart does not apply to a former DOE employee's testimony as an expert in an adversarial proceeding in which the United States is a party or has a direct and substantial interest.
Case 2:06-cv-00716-WKW-WC Document 1 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00716-WKW-WC Document 1 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00716-WKW-WC Document 1 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00716-WKW-WC Document 1 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 4 of 4
SUBPART 27.90 – TRADEMARK RIGHTS UNDER GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS     **Parent topic:** PART 27 –– PATENTS, DATA, AND COPYRIGHTS27.9000 Definitions.    *Trademark* is a word, phrase, symbol or design, or a combination that identifies your goods or services, distinguishes them from the goods or services of others, and indicates the source of your goods or services.       *Service Mark* is a word, phrase, symbol or design, or a combination of words, phrases, symbols or designs, that identifies and distinguishes the source of a service of one party from that of other parties.27.9001 Trademark rights under government contracts.    The FAR and DFARS do not address trademark or service mark rights, nor is there an official DoD policy on ownership of trademarks or service marks first used in performance of a government contract in connection with goods or services delivered to the Government. Under federal trademark law, trademark rights generally reside with the entity that controls the nature and quality of the goods or services that are identified by the trademark.       However, in certain cases, it may be in the Government’s best interest for DISA to own a trademark or service mark first created under a contract. For example, Government ownership may be desired for a mark that is to be used exclusively in connection with a government-controlled service that the contractor manages for DISA. DISA’s Office of the General Counsel should be consulted to determine if there is a need to negotiate trademark ownership rights with the contractor and seek federal trademark protection on DISA’s behalf by filing an application to register the trademark or service mark with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Humberto Fidel Regalado CUELLAR, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 05-10065.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 30, 2006.

Nancy E. Larson, Asst. U.S. Atty., Fort Worth, TX, Denise B. Williams (argued), Amanda R. Burch, Lubbock, TX, for U.S.

Jerry V. Beard, Asst. Fed. Pub. Def. (argued), Lubbock, TX, for Cuellar.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and KING, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, DENNIS, CLEMENT, PRADO and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Marcos Urbaez, Appellant.

Submitted July 23, 2007;

decided September 6, 2007

Reported below, 14 Misc 3d 135(A).

*897Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Steven Banks, Esq., the Legal Aid Society, 199 Water Street, New York, NY 10038 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 76523]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30889]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 2 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of Delaware, North Carolina, South Carolina, Maryland, 
Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia and the District of Columbia)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 2 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, 
ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, January 19, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Audrey Y. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 
718-488-2085.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Area 2 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Wednesday, January 19, 2011, at 2:30 p.m. Eastern Time via telephone 
conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, 
notification of intent to participate must be made with Audrey Jenkins. 
For more information, please contact Ms. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 
718-488-2085, or write TAP Office, 10 MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton 
Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or post comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: December 3, 2010.
Shawn F. Collins,
Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2010-30889 Filed 12-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3382 

To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain drawback claims. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 6, 2006 

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain 

drawback claims. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIQUIDATION OR RELIQUIDATION OF CERTAIN 

4 DRAWBACK CLAIMS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 514 of 

6 the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other pro7 vision of law, the Bureau of Customs and Border Protec8 tion shall, not later than 90 days after the date of the 

9 enactment of this Act, liquidate or reliquidate the draw10 back claims, as filed, that are described in subsection (c). 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•S 3382 IS 

1 (b) PAYMENT OF AMOUNTS DUE.—Any amounts due 

2 pursuant to the liquidation or reliquidation of the claims 

3 described in subsection (c) shall be paid not later than 

4 90 days after the date of such liquidation or reliquidation. 

5 (c) DRAWBACK CLAIMS.—The drawback claims re6 ferred to in subsection (a) are the following: 

Drawback claim number Filing 

date 

AA6–0246667–1 11/03/94 

AA6–0246689–5 12/02/94 

AA6–0246690–3 11/10/94 

AA6–0302619–3 01/21/97 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
Order filed August 28, 2018

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 18

- 00468

- CV

____________ IN THE INTEREST OF K .A.P., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 311th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2015

- 57994



### ORDER According to information provided to this court, appellant may be attempting to appeal a non

- appealable order . Our records reflect that appellant is attempting to appeal the denial of a Motion to Vacate for Want of Jurisdiction

. The clerk’s record has not been filed in this appeal. The District Clerk has informed this court that appellant did not pay for preparation of the clerk’s record. In response to notices from this court, appellant filed a Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of Costs

. Appellant is deemed indigent for purposes of the appellate filing fee only. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1. Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 145 provides a procedure for aparty’s claim that the party is unable to afford costs for preparation of the appellate

record. In orde r to obtain the clerk’s record and reporter’s record without payment of costs a party must file a Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of Court Costs in the trial court. To determine our jurisdiction over this appeal, we issue the following order for a partial clerk’s record.

We order the Harris County District Clerk to file a partial clerk’s record with the clerk of this court on or before September 12, 2018

. T he partial clerk’s record shall contain (1) the judgment being appealed; (2) any motion for n ew trial, other post

- judgment motion, or request for findings of fact and conclusions of law; and (3) the notice of appeal.

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




The undersigned hereby certifies, in her capacity as Chief Executive Officer of China Industrial Waste Management, Inc. (the “Company”), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of her knowledge:





(1)      The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  May 13, 2011





/s/ Jinqing DongName: Jinqing DongChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)





This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 958.8 Grading.

*Grading* is synonymous with *prepare for market* and means the sorting or separation of onions into grades and sizes for market purposes.
#### In re PHILLIPS.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

November 20, 1914.)

In the matter of the application of Ellery O. as receiver of the estate of Li borlo Marroni, a judgment debtor.

No opinion. Order of the County Court of Kings County affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

BRENDA L. BOSWELL, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. )Civil Action No. 2:06-cv-686-MHT

) [wo]

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, )

Commissioner of Social Security, )

)

Defendant. )

OPINION

On February 22, 2007, a United States Magistrate Judge recommended that the decision of

the Commissioner be affirmed in this case. (Doc. # 17). Plaintiff has not filed any objections to the

Recommendation. After independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the

Recommendation should be adopted.

An appropriate judgment will be entered.

DONE, this the 16th day of March, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00686-MHT-TFM Document 18 Filed 03/16/07 Page 1 of 1
**MOORE
      & ASSOCIATES, CHARTERED**


****** ***ACCOUNTANTS
      AND ADVISORS***


***PCAOB
      REGISTERED***

















**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**











We
      consent to the use, in the statement on Form 10KSB of Bridgefilms Inc, of our
      report dated October 11, 2007 on our audit of the financial statements of
      Bridgefilms Inc as of August 31, 2007 and 2006 ,
      and the
      related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows through
      August 31, 2007 and 2006 and from (inception) through August 31,
      2007 ,
      and the
      reference to us under the caption “Experts.”







***/s/
      Moore & Associates, Chartered***


Moore
      & Associates Chartered


Las
      Vegas, Nevada


November
      28, 2007
























































*2675
      S. Jones Blvd. Suite 109, Las Vegas, NV 89146 (702)253-7499 Fax (702)253-7501*
# Subpart 1514.2 - Solicitation of Bids

**Parent topic:**PART 1514 - SEALED BIDDING

## 1514.201 Preparation of invitations for bids.

## 1514.201-6 Solicitation provisions.

The Contracting Officer shall insert the solicitation provision at 1552.214-71, Contract Award-Other Factors-Sealed Bidding, in invitations for bids when it is appropriate to describe other factors that will be used in evaluating bids for award. 

## 1514.201-7 Contract clauses.

The CCO is authorized to waive the inclusion of the clauses at FAR 52.214-27 and 52.214-28, in accordance with FAR 14.201-7. 

## 1514.205 Solicitation mailing lists.

When a solicitation and all amendments are posted on the Internet with a synopsis providing information as to how to access the solicitation and all amendments, the CO will need to maintain a mailing list of only those individuals requesting paper copies from the contract service center/branch. When possible, the CO should also build an electronic “mailing list” of companies downloading the solicitation from the Internet.
-1-

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

ELIZABETH LYNNE HUTCHINSON, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO:

vs. ) CV-06-00700-WHA

) JURY DEMAND

)

PHENIX CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION, )

LARRY E. DICHIARA, officially as )

as Superintendent of the Phenix City Schools )

)

)

Defendants. )

PLAINTIFF’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL EXHIBIT LIST

COMES NOW, Plaintiff Elizabeth Hutchinson, and lists the following additional

exhibits that may be used at the trial of this action which were not included in the original

Exhibit List (Doc. #40). Plaintiff hereby incorporates by reference Plaintiff’s Exhibit List (Doc.

#40) and adds the following additional documents:

42. Plaintiff’s Back pay chart

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Joshua D. Wilson

Rocco Calamusa, Jr.

Joshua D. Wilson

Attorneys for the Plaintiff

OF COUNSEL

Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 52 Filed 07/20/2007 Page 1 of 2
-2-

WIGGINS, CHILDS, QUINN & PANTAZIS, LLC

The Kress Building

301 19

th Street North

Birmingham, Alabama 35203

(205) 314-0500

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I do hereby certify that on this the 20

th

day of July , 2007, I electronically filed the

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of

such filing to the following:

Sidney S. Smith

Smith & Smith, PC

1503 Broad Street

Phenix City, AL 36867

/s/ Joshua D. Wilson

OF COUNSEL

Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 52 Filed 07/20/2007 Page 2 of 2
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3308 

To suspend temporarily the duty on lightweight digital camera lenses. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 26, 2006 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mrs. CLINTON) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on lightweight digital 

camera lenses. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIGHTWEIGHT DIGITAL CAMERA LENSES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.11.01 Lightweight lenses for digital cameras 

with focal length between 55 mm and 

200 mm inclusive, and not exceeding 9 

oz. in weight (provided for in subheading 

9002.11.90) ............................................. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 3308 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

ELIZABETH LYNN HUTCHINSON, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

 )

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06cv700-WHA

 )

PHENIX CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION, )

et al., )

 )

Defendants. )

ORDER

The trial of this case having now been moved to June 23, 2008, it is hereby

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Exhibit List (Doc. #47) and Motion to Strike

Witness List (Doc. #48) are DENIED, without prejudice to re-filing at a later date, if appropriate.

DONE this 4th day of December, 2007.

/s/ W. Harold Albritton 

W. HAROLD ALBRITTON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 60 Filed 12/04/2007 Page 1 of 1