alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

I, William B. Kretzmer, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MAI SystemsCorporation;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisquarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

 

a)              designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;

 

b)             evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of adate within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “EvaluationDate”); and

 

c)            presented in thisquarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5.The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation, to the registrant’s   auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent function):

 

a)              all significantdeficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which couldadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors anymaterial weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b)             any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 

6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated inthis quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internalcontrols or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controlssubsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any correctiveactions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

 
| Date: November 18, 2005 | By:    |   /s/    William B. Kretzmer |   |
|-------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                    |   |   William B. Kretzmer                  |
|                    |   |   Chief Executive Officer              |

 

----
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 27 Filed 12/11/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 27 Filed 12/11/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 27 Filed 12/11/2006 Page 3 of 3
#### § 781.6 Paperwork Reduction Act assigned number.

The information collection requirements contained in these regulations (7 CFR part 781) have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the provisions of 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35 and have been assigned OMB control number 0560-0097.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

DAVID FINNEY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 3:06-cv-622-WKW

)

NISSAN NORTH AMERICAN, INC., et al.,) 

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Stipulation of Dismissal (Doc. # 72), it is ORDERED that

this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs.

The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as

a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

DONE this 18th day of March, 2008.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 73 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 1 of 1
947.7002 Contract clause.       When foreign travel may be required under the contract, the contracting officer shall insert the clause at 952.247-70, Foreign Travel.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 947.70 - Foreign Travel
156 So.2d 605

#### ABRY BROTHERS, INC. v. Ruth TILLMAN, divorced wife of G. R. Tillman.

No. 46646.

Oct. 9, 1963.

Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit.

148 So.2d 804.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
#### Barbara J. Keefe, as Administratrix of the Estate of Edwin T. Keefe, Deceased, Respondent, v. Michael Bodwitch et al., Individually and as Copartners, et al., Appellants.

(Appeal No. 3.)

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Same memorandum as in *Sacco*V. *Bodwitch*(34 A D 2d 885). (Appeal from judgment of Oswego Trial Term in automobile negligence action.) Present — Del Vecchio, J. P., Marsh, Gabrielli, Moule and Henry, JJ.
#### § 1005.5 What is the Secretary's obligation with respect to Federal interagency coordination?

The Secretary, to the extent practicable, consults with and seeks advice from all other substantially affected federal departments and agencies in an effort to assure full coordination between such agencies and the Department regarding programs and activities covered under these regulations.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet dated March 31, 1997 and its Consolidated
Statement of Operations covering the period from October 1, 1996 to March 31,
1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements
and notes thereof.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          623800
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    13648
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    6997134
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         3264191
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2120431
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 9822585
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        1851534
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          5918
<OTHER-SE>                                     7399316
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   9822585
<SALES>                                        1771771
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1771771
<CGS>                                           459580
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   459580
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                882940
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               99497
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 796862
<INCOME-TAX>                                     99800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             697062
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    697062
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20
        

</TABLE>
#### § 985.26 Vacancies.

To fill any vacancy occasioned by the failure of any person appointed as a member or as an alternate member of the Committee to qualify, or in the event of the death, removal, resignation, or disqualification of any member or alternate member of the Committee, a successor to fill the unexpired term shall be nominated and appointed in the manner specified in §§ 985.23 and 985.24. If the names of the nominees to fill any such vacancy are not made available to the Secretary within 30 days after such vacancy occurs, the Secretary may fill such vacancy without regard to nominations, which appointment shall be made on the basis of representation provided for in § 985.20.
#### DUMSER, Respondent, v. NICKLES, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 19, 1914.)

Action by Elizabeth Dumser against Eva Nickles, etc.

No opinion. Motion denied, on condition that appellant perfect her appeal, place the case on the next calendar, and be ready for argument when reached; otherwise, motion granted, with $10 costs.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

JOSE LUIS ALVARADO-MANRIQUEZ, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-50010 

D.C. No. 3:16-cr-02173-BEN 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Roger T. Benitez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 26, 2017**

Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

Jose Luis Alvarado-Manriquez appeals from the district court’s judgment 

and challenges the 24-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea 

conviction for improper entry by an alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1325. 

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Alvarado-Manriquez’s 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

SEP 29 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 17-50010 

counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a 

motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Alvarado-Manriquez 

the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or 

answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLUS, INCORPORATED FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
MAY 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                          22,177
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  216,430
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     25,166
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               459,255
<PP&E>                                         135,459
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,732
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 723,654
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          209,064
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    466,600
<COMMON>                                        40,328
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,662
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   723,654
<SALES>                                        482,381
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               508,209
<CGS>                                          389,296
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  389,296
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               210,917
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (92,004)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (92,004)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (92,004)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
LEGAL02/30054246v1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

BETTY J. ADAMS, et al., )

)

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

)

Civil Action No. 2:06-CV-660-LESCSC

v. )

)

)

)

PACTIV CORPORATION and 

LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORPORATION

)

)

)

Defendants. )

)

CONSENT ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

With the express consent and agreement of counsel for Plaintiffs, Defendant 

Pactiv Corporation and Defendant Louisiana-Pacific Corporation; and

It appearing that the period of time within which Defendants may answer, plead, 

move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint and Amended Complaint has not yet 

expired;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, in accordance with Rule 6(b) of the Federal Rules of 

Civil Procedure, that the time within which Defendants may answer, plead, move, or

otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint and Amended Complaint be enlarged through 

and including September 25, 2006. 

This ____ day of _____________, 2006.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:06-cv-00660-LES-CSC Document 9 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY CO., Appellant, v. SCHIFF et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 12, 1906.)

Action by the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company against Max Schiff and Gus Moos.

No opinion. Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Welsbach Co. v. Norwich Gas & Electric Co., 180 N. Y. 533, 72 N. E. 1152.
§ 990.32 Recordkeeping requirements. ( a ) USDA licensees shall maintain records of all hemp plants acquired, produced, handled, disposed of, or remediated as will substantiate the required reports.
( b ) All records and reports shall be maintained for at least three years.
( c ) All records shall be made available for inspection by USDA inspectors, auditors, or their representatives during reasonable business hours. The following records must be made available: ( 1 ) Records regarding acquisition of hemp plants;
( 2 ) Records regarding production and handling of hemp plants;
( 3 ) Records regarding storage of hemp plants; and
( 4 ) Records regarding disposal and remediation of all cannabis plants that do not meet the definition of hemp.
( d ) USDA inspectors, auditors, or their representatives shall have access to any premises where hemp plants may be held during reasonable business hours.
( e ) All reports and records required to be submitted to USDA as part of participation in the program in this part which include confidential data or business information, including but not limited to information constituting a trade secret or disclosing a trade position, financial condition, or business operations of the particular licensee or their customers, shall be received by, and at all times kept in the custody and control of, one or more employees of USDA or their representatives. Confidential data or business information may be shared with applicable Federal, State, Tribal, or local law enforcement or their designee in compliance with the Act.
Subpart 625.1—Buy American—Supplies

Parent topic: PART 625—FOREIGN ACQUISITION

625.103 Exceptions.

(a) The authority to make the determination prescribed in FAR 25.103(a) is delegated, without

power of redelegation, to the head of the contracting activity.

625.105 Determining reasonableness of cost.

(a)

(1) The authority to make the determinations prescribed in FAR 25.105(a)

(1) is delegated, without power of redelegation, to the head of the contracting activity.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

CAMELLIA THERAPEUTIC )

FOSTER AGENCY, LLC, etc., )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv735-MHT

) 

THE ALABAMA DEPARTMENT )

OF HUMAN RESOURCES, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

Because of a scheduling conflict, it is ORDERED the

uniform scheduling order (Doc. No. 19) is modified in the

following respects:

(1) The pretrial is reset for October 18, 2007, at

9:45 a.m., and the trial is reset for the term

of court beginning on November 26, 2007, with

all deadlines expressly tied to these two dates

adjusted accordingly.

(2) All other deadlines are unchanged.

DONE, this the 15th day of August, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00735-MHT-CSC Document 44 Filed 08/15/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### § 981.467 Disposition in reserve outlets by handlers.

(a) *Agents of Board.* Beginning with August 1 of any crop year, a handler may become an agent of the Board pursuant to § 981.67 for the purpose of disposing of reserve almonds of such crop year, in the authorized outlets. The agency shall be established upon a handler executing a reserve agreement (ABC Form 12) ABC, applicable to diversion, containing terms and conditions specified by the Board.

(b) *Reserve credit.* Credit in satisfaction of a reserve obligation shall not exceed the accrued reserve obligation derived by applying the reserve percentage to the quanity of almonds received by a handler for his own account during the crop year. Disposition by an agent of the Board in eligible reserve outlets within a crop year in excess of his reserve obligation shall be held to be a disposition of salable almonds. Whenever such disposition has been inspected and certified, if required, and has complied with the terms, conditions, and documentation applicable to disposition of reserve almonds as determined by the Board, the disposition may be credited against any reserve obligation subsequently incurred by the handler during that crop year, or the disposition may be credited pursuant to § 981.455(b) against the reserve obligation of another handler.

(c) *Minimum prices.* Minimum prices shall apply to 1990-91 crop year reserve almonds diverted to almond butter, natural almond paste, foil packets for sales to airlines, and sales to government agencies, including federal and state school lunch programs. Prices are F.O.B. handlers plant. The prices may contain a maximum of two percent brokerage commission. No cash discounts are allowed. The prices are as follows for various grades or categories of almonds:

| Grade or category | Price per pound |
| --- | --- |
| U.S. Select Sheller Run or better, unblanched | 75 cents. |
| U.S. Standard Sheller Run, unblanched | 74 cents. |
| U.S. No. 1 Whole and Broken, unblanched | 73 cents. |
| U.S. No. 1 Pieces, unblanched | 73 cents. |
| U.S. No. 1 Pieces or better, unblanched, to be used for almond butter manufactured in the 48 contiguous states and shipped to EEC countries | 60 cents. |
| Blanched made from U.S. No. 1 Pieces or better | 95 cents. |
| Blanched made from U.S. No. 1 Pieces or better to be used for almond butter manufactured in the 48 continguous states and shipped to EEC countries | 82 cents. |

(d) For the 1990-91 crop year only, the reserve disposition obligation date is extended until September 1, 1992, and the date for submitting documentation verifying reserve dispositions is extended to December 1, 1992.

[42 FR 19322, Apr. 13, 1977, as amended at 56 FR 10508, Mar. 13, 1991; 56 FR 51150, Oct. 10, 1991; 57 FR 27353, June 19, 1992; 61 FR 32922, June 26, 1996]

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

At 88 FR 82235, Nov. 24, 2023, § 981.467 was amended; however, the amendments could not be incorporated because the section was stayed indefinitely at 88 FR 67627, Oct. 2, 2023.

###### Effective Date Note

#### At 88 FR 67627, Oct. 2, 2023, §§981.467 was stayed indefinitely.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          15,143
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 4,493
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     75,466
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        236,223
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,650
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 344,319
<DEPOSITS>                                     286,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                    17,474
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,351
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           356
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,494
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 344,319
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 16,267
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,524
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   224
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                20,015
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               8,182
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,700
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           11,315
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,092
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  44
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,806
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,461
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,015
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,015
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .88
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.79
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,620
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    66
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  9,230
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,484
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      686
<RECOVERIES>                                       322
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,844
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,844
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1101 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1101

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      December 8, 2006.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 5682) to exempt from 
certain requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 a proposed nuclear 
agreement for cooperation with India. All points of order against the conference 
report and against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be 
considered as read.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```