alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
February 13, 2013

Mr. James Sparks

Richardson Aviation

3800 Lincoln Avenue

Fort Worth , TX 76106

Dear Mr. Sparks :

This letter responds to your November 28, 2011, petition to the Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA) in which you request clarificatio n of statements found in

14 Code of Federal Regulations, part 43, appendix E and § 91.411(b)(3). Specifically, you

provided a change that would replace parenthetical language “static system tests and

inspections only” with “ static pressure system and sys tem integration tests ”

.

In general, we use the following criteria to determine which petitions for rulemaking are of

sufficient priority to initiate a rulemaking action:

1) The immediacy of the safety concerns the petition raises;

2) The priority of other FAA rulemaking actions; and

3) The resources we have available to address these issues.

The issue you raise is not a safety concern. The FAA’s limited rulemaking resources

currently are being used to address numerous priority safety

- related issues, including mo re

than 30 initiatives underway to address legislative mandates, most with critical deadlines.

We also have underway a comprehensive overhaul of our Next Generation Air Transportation

System (NEXTGEN) to make air travel more convenient, dependable, safe , and secure. Part of

this initiative will require that we review and possibly amend many outdated regulations . The

test requirements that you reference will be addressed in rulemakings related to implementation

of NEXTGEN; we will not undertake separate action to address this petition. We will,

however, ensure that your petition is taken into consideration as part of that effort.2

In consideration of the foregoing and pursuant to the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113

and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, your petition for rulemaking is hereby

denied.

Sincerely,

/s/

John M. Allen

Director, Flight Standards Service
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 26, 2011

y0919 

# Order

September 26, 2011

142988

KYRIA GORE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 142988 COA: 294157 Wayne CC: 08-114429-NZ BRENDA BELCHER, DE TROIT BOARD OF EDUCATION, and DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the March 17, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William Stevenson Battle, Also Known as William Sanders, Also Known as “Alabama”, Also Known as Robert Williams, Appellant.

By a previous decision of this court rendered July 15, 1968 on this appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County, rendered June 15, 1966, this ease was remitted to the trial court for a *de novo*hearing to determine whether the evidence taken from defendant was admissible at the trial; and the appeal has been held in abeyance in the interim *{People*v. *Battle,*30 A D 2d 842). The hearing has been held and an order thereon has been made adverse to defendant, dated December 5, 1968. Judgment affirmed. No opinion. Christ, P. J., Brennan, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur. (Beldock, P. J., deceased.)
Exhibit 10.2


 


OMNIBUS
AGREEMENT EXTENSION


 


This Omnibus Agreement Extension (“Agreement”)
is entered into on March 8, 2018, and is by and between EnerVest, Ltd., a Texas limited partnership (“EnerVest”)
and EV Energy GP, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the “General Partner”).


 


WHEREAS, the Omnibus Agreement (the “First
Omnibus Agreement”), was entered into on September 29, 2006, by and among EnerVest, EV Management LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company (“EV Management”), the General Partner, EV Energy Partners, LP, a Delaware limited partnership
(the “Partnership”), and EV Properties, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“OLP”). Any
capitalized term not defined herein shall have the meaning set forth therein;


 


WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 3.3 of the
First Omnibus Agreement, EnerVest and the General Partner determine the amount of general and administrative expenses that will
be properly allocated to the Partnership after December 31, 2008;


 


WHEREAS, the First Omnibus Agreement automatically
renews each year if it is not terminated by either EnerVest or the General Partner;


 


WHEREAS, the First Omnibus Agreement was
extended by the Omnibus Agreement Extensions entered into on December 17, 2008, December 10, 2009, December 21, 2010, December
20, 2011; February 25, 2013, February 15, 2014, February 25, 2015, February 25, 2016, and February 23, 2017;


 


WHEREAS, neither party has terminated the
First Omnibus Agreement; and


 


WHEREAS, based on the recommendation of
the Conflicts Committee of the Board of Directors of EV Management, which provided Special Approval (as defined in the limited
partnership agreement of the Partnership) to the extension of the First Omnibus Agreement as contemplated by this Agreement, the
Board of Directors of EV Management has authorized and approved the extension of the First Omnibus Agreement as contemplated by
this Agreement.


 


In consideration of the premises and the
covenants, conditions, and agreements contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency
of which are hereby acknowledged, EnerVest and the General Partner hereby agree as follows:


 


1. The First Omnibus Agreement shall continue in effect
until December 31, 2018, subject to termination or automatic renewal on such date as provided in the First Omnibus Agreement.


 




    	1



     


    

 


2. The Partnership shall pay EnerVest a fee of $1,433,333.33
per month for the services described in the First Omnibus Agreement, subject to adjustment as provided in Section 3.3 therein.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have
executed this Agreement on, and effective as of, the date above first written.


 


	ENERVEST, LTD.
	 	 	 
	By:	EnerVest Management GP, L.C., 	 
	 	its general partner	 
	 	 	 
	By: 	/s/JOHN B WALKER	 
	 	   John B. Walker	 
	 	   Chief Executive Officer	 
	 	 	 
	EV ENERGY GP, L.P.
	 	 	 
	By:	EV MANAGEMENT, L.L.C., 	 
	 	its general partner	 
	 	 	 
	By: 	/s/NICHOLAS P. BOBROWSKI	 
	 	   Nicholas P. Bobrowski	 
	 	   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer	 


 




    	2
APPENDIX H 

NOISE MONITORING DATA
§ 987.29 Powers. The Committee shall have the following powers: ( a ) To administer the terms and provisions of this subpart.
( b ) To make rules and regulations to effectuate the terms and provisions of this subpart.
( c ) To receive, investigate, and report to the Secretary complaints of violations of this subpart, and
( d ) To recommend to the Secretary amendments to this subpart.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3323 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Propylene Glycol Alginates (PGA) be 

eliminated. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 26, 2006 

Mr. MENENDEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Propylene Glycol 

Alginates (PGA) be eliminated. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROPYLENE GLYCOL ALGINATES (PGA). 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.39.13 Propylene Glycol Alginates (provided for 

in subheading 3913.10.00) ...................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) shall apply to all imported applicable goods 


dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•S 3323 IS 

1 entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, 

2 on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 

3 of this Act. 

Æ 


dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

ELIZABETH LYNNE HUTCHINSON, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

 )

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06cv700-WHA

 )

PHENIX CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION, )

et al., )

 )

Defendants. )

ORDER

All deadlines under the existing Uniform Scheduling Order have passed, with this case

now being set for pretrial hearing on February 1, 2008, and trial on March 3, 2008. The parties

have entered a “Consent to Revise Existing Deadlines to Conform to New Trial and Pretrial

Dates,” (Doc. #53), but with no new deadline dates specifically suggested. The court will leave

the existing Uniform Scheduling Order unchanged, unless, no later than November 26, 2007,

the parties submit an Amended Report of Parties Planning Meeting requesting specific new

deadline dates for discovery, disclosure of witnesses and exhibits, and specification of deposition

excerpts.

DONE this 9th day of November, 2007.

 /s/ W. Harold Albritton 

W. HAROLD ALBRITTON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 55 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 1 of 1
# 34.003 Responsibilities.

(a) The DISA Component Acquisition Executive (CAE) is the designee.

**Parent topic:**SUBPART 34.0 –– GENERAL
Subpart 3005.4—Release of Information

Parent topic: PART 3005—PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONS

3005.402 General public.

Requests for other specific records information shall be processed according to the DHS Freedom of

Information Act rules and regulations (HSAR) 48 CFR 3024.203.

3005.470 Contractor award announcements, advertisements,

and releases.

3005.470-1 Policy.

(a) DHS policy requires its contracting officers to restrict DHS contractors from referring to its DHS

contract(s) in commercial advertising in a manner that states or implies the Government approves or

endorses the contractor's products or services or considers them superior to other products or

services. The intent of this policy is to prevent the appearance of Government bias toward any

product or service.

(b) The Department's contractors share the responsibility for protecting sensitive and classified

information related to efforts under their contracts. For any contract that involves sensitive or

classified information, prior to the release of any contract award announcement, advertisement, or

other release of information pertaining to the contract, the contractor must obtain the approval of

the responsible contracting officer.

3005.470-2 Contract clauses.

(a) Insert the clause at (HSAR) 48 CFR 3052.205–70, Advertisements, Publicizing Awards, and

Releases, in all solicitations and contracts that exceed the simplified acquisition threshold.

(b) Except for research contracts with educational institutions, if the contract involves sensitive or

classified information, use the clause with its Alternate I. For research contracts with educational

institutions, see (HSAR) 48 CFR 3035.70–2(b).
#### § 923.10 Size.

*Size* means the greatest diameter, measured through the center of the cherry, at right angles to a line running from the stem to the blossom end, or such other specification as may be established by the committee with the approval of the Secretary.
| **National Center    for     Health Statistics            Division of Data     Services            6525 Belcrest Road     Hyattsville, MD     20782-2003     (301)458-4636      **

 
**Contact usHome | Customer Satisfaction Survey | (CDC) Privacy Policy NoticeSearch NCHS**
**Thank You**

Thank you for    visiting our Web site.  Please use the form below to submit data requests and any    questions you may have concerning our programs, activities, products, and services. For    certificates of birth, death, marriage, or divorce, view our **Where to Write**. 

**Give    us some feedback and fill out ourCustomer Satisfaction Survey!**

**Name:**

**Title:**

**Organization:**

**Address:**

**Telephone number:**

**Internet e-mail address****(required!)**:
**Please enter your message in      the space below:**

 

**Home |      Customer Satisfaction Survey      | (CDC) Privacy Policy NoticeSearch NCHS**
**CDC Home | Search    | Health Topics A-Z**
This page last reviewed August 03, 2000

**U.S.    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES****Centers    for Disease Control and Prevention**    National Center for Health Statistics    Division of Data Services     Hyattsville, MD    20782-2003    (301) 458-4636
  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
§ 983.52 Failed lots/rework procedure. ( a ) *Substandard pistachios.* Each lot of substandard pistachios may be reworked to meet aflatoxin or quality requirements. The committee may establish, with the Secretary's approval, appropriate rework procedures.
( b ) *Failed lot reporting.* If a lot fails to meet the aflatoxin and/or the quality requirements of this part, a failed lot notification report shall be completed and sent to the committee within 10 working days of the test failure. This form must be completed and submitted to the committee each time a lot fails either aflatoxin or quality testing. The accredited laboratories shall send the failed lot notification reports for aflatoxin tests to the committee, and the handler, under the supervision of an inspector, shall send the failed lot notification reports for the lots that do not meet the quality requirements to the committee.
[74 FR 56542, Nov. 2, 2009]
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 67 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### § 623.22 Filing of false claims.

If it is determined by NRCS that any participant has knowingly supplied false information or has knowingly filed a false claim, such participant shall be ineligible for any payment under this part. False information or false claims include claims for payment for practices which do not meet the specifications of the applicable WRPO. Any amounts paid under these circumstances shall be refunded, together with interest as determined by NRCS, and any amounts otherwise due such participant shall be withheld.
1532.1070 Contract Clauses.

(a) The contracting officer shall utilize the clause at 1552.332-39, Unenforceability of Unauthorized

Obligations (FAR DEVIATION) in all solicitations and contracts in lieu of nondeviated FAR

52.232-39.

(b) The contracting officer shall utilize the clause at 1552.232-75, Commercial Supplier AgreementsUnenforceable Clauses, in all procurements where supplies or services are offered under a

commercial supplier agreement (CSA).

Editorial Note: At 86 FR 55713, Oct. 7, 2021, Subpart 1532.10 was added with undesignated text.

This text could not be added due to incorrect amendatory instruction.

Parent topic: Subpart 1532.10 - Unenforceability of Unauthorized Obligations
# Subpart 1524.2 - Freedom of Information Act [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**PART 1524 - PROTECTION OF PRIVACY AND FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 9 Filed 09/20/2006 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 9 Filed 09/20/2006 Page 2 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 9 Filed 09/20/2006 Page 3 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 9 Filed 09/20/2006 Page 4 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 9 Filed 09/20/2006 Page 5 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 9 Filed 09/20/2006 Page 6 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 9 Filed 09/20/2006 Page 7 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 9 Filed 09/20/2006 Page 8 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 9 Filed 09/20/2006 Page 9 of 9
323.7000 Scope of subpart.       This subpart provides procedures for administering safety and health requirements.    **Parent topic:** PART 323 - ENVIRONMENT, ENERGY AND WATER EFFICIENCY, RENEWABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY, AND DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE
§ 986.29 Pecans. ( a ) *Pecans* means and includes any and all varieties or subvarieties of Genus: *Carya,* Species: *illinoensis,* expressed also as *Carya illinoinensis (syn. C. illinoenses)* including all varieties thereof, excluding hicans, that are produced in the production area and are classified as: ( 1 ) *Native or seedling* pecans harvested from non-grafted or naturally propagated tree varieties;
( 2 ) *Improved pecans* harvested from grafted tree varieties bred or selected for superior traits of nut size, ease of shelling, production characteristics, and resistance to certain insects and diseases, including but not limited to: Desirable, Elliot, Forkert, Sumner, Creek, Excel, Gracross, Gratex, Gloria Grande, Kiowa, Moreland, Sioux, Mahan, Mandan, Moneymaker, Morrill, Cunard, Zinner, Byrd, McMillan, Stuart, Pawnee, Eastern and Western Schley, Wichita, Success, Cape Fear, Choctaw, Cheyenne, Lakota, Kanza, Caddo, and Oconee; and
( 3 ) *Substandard pecans* that are blowouts, cracks, stick-tights, and other inferior quality pecans, whether native or improved, that, with further handling, can be cleaned and eventually sold into the stream of commerce.
( b ) The Council, with the approval of the Secretary, may recognize new or delete obsolete varieties or sub-varieties for each category.
Case 3:20-cv-05896-MCR-EMT   Document 1   Filed 10/21/20   Page 1 of 10

Case 3:20-cv-05896-MCR-EMT   Document 1   Filed 10/21/20   Page 2 of 10

Case 3:20-cv-05896-MCR-EMT   Document 1   Filed 10/21/20   Page 3 of 10

Case 3:20-cv-05896-MCR-EMT   Document 1   Filed 10/21/20   Page 4 of 10

Case 3:20-cv-05896-MCR-EMT   Document 1   Filed 10/21/20   Page 5 of 10

Case 3:20-cv-05896-MCR-EMT   Document 1   Filed 10/21/20   Page 6 of 10

Case 3:20-cv-05896-MCR-EMT   Document 1   Filed 10/21/20   Page 7 of 10

Case 3:20-cv-05896-MCR-EMT   Document 1   Filed 10/21/20   Page 8 of 10

Case 3:20-cv-05896-MCR-EMT   Document 1   Filed 10/21/20   Page 9 of 10

Case 3:20-cv-05896-MCR-EMT   Document 1   Filed 10/21/20   Page 10 of 10
###### Editorial Note on Part 982

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 61 FR 17559, Apr. 22, 1996.

#### § 982.60 Expenses.

The Board is authorized to incur such expenses including maintenance of an operating reserve fund as the Secretary may find are reasonable and likely to be incurred by it during each marketing year, for the maintenance and functioning of the Board and for such purposes as the Secretary may, pursuant to the provisions of this subpart, determine to be appropriate. The recommendation of the Board as to the expenses and size of the operating reserve for each such marketing year, together with all data supporting such recommendations, shall be submitted to the Secretary at the beginning of the fiscal year in connection with which such recommendation is made. The funds to cover such expenses shall be acquired by levying assessments as provided in § 982.61.
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 11-30227 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. CARLOS HURTADO-VALOIS, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:10-CR-40-2
Before KING, JOLLY, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Carlos Hurtado-Valois has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 ( 1967), and United State s v . Flores , 632 F.3d 229 ( 5th Cir. 2011). Hurtado-Valois has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflect e d th erein, as well as Hurtado-Valois’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appe a l p r e s e n ts no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D June 20 , 20 12 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 , the cour t hasd ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 11-30227 Document: 00511893979 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/20/2012No. 11-30227

The record does reveal a clerical error in the judgment with respect to the statute of conviction cited for count five. The judgment should be corrected to reflect that Hurtado-Valois was convicted of illegal entry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1325. SeeF E D
. R. C R I M
. P. 36. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from fu rth e r responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2. This matter is REMANDED for correction of the clerical error pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36.

2 Case: 11-30227 Document: 00511893979 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/20/2012