alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Michael M., Appellant.

Judgement unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The testimony of witness Wytzka, that the man she saw hurriedly leave the building where the alleged crime was committed and get in a car was the same man she had *733twice seen a short time previously and a couple of weeks later at the Geddes Town Hall, was improperly received on the trial and considered by the trial court. Prior to trial defendant moved to suppress any identification of defendant by Mrs. Wytzka. From her testimony on the suppression hearing it appeared her main observation of him was of his boots and seeing him from the rear, and she never saw him face-to-face. At police headquarters the same night he alone was placed in a show-up, and she identified him from the back and from a pair of boots he had similar to those she had seen earlier. At the close of the hearing the Judge ruled that the rear view of the defendant by Mrs. Wytzka was too sketchy, that her identification might well in fact have ‘been bolstered by viewing the defendant at the police show-up and that her identification testimony, as a matter of law, was inadmissible at the trial. Despite the exclusionary ruling made on the suppression hearing, the Trial Judge permitted the identification testimony of the witness Wytzka to be given at the trial, and at its conclusion found that the identification of the defendant by Mrs. Wytzka was positive and definite. While the trial court was in error in receiving and crediting such identification testimony, the positive identification •by Mrs. Muller, the victim of the crime, of the man she had 15 minutes to observe in her apartment as the defendant, and the court’s proper finding that such identification was not tainted by her viewing of him at police headquarters, as well as Mrs. Wytzka’s accurate identification of the license number and color of the car used, provided such convincing proof connecting the defendant with the commission of the crime, that, the consideration given the Wytzka identification of the defendant by the court did not constitute reversible error. (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga Supreme Court, adjudicating defendant a youthful offender.) Present—Del Vecchio, J. P., Marsh, Gabrielli, Bastow and Henry, JJ.
EXHIBIT
32





Certification
Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
Adopted Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Detection Technology (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jacques Tizabi, Principal Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial
Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Registrant, certify to the best
of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.





Dated: May 24,
      2010
              /s/ Jacques
      TizabiJacques
      Tizabi
                Principal
      Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial Officer and
                Principal
      Accounting Officer
#### § 983.87 Effective time.

The provisions of this part, as well as any amendments, shall become effective at such time as the Secretary may declare, and shall continue in force until terminated or suspended in one of the ways specified in § 983.88 or § 983.89.

[74 FR 56540, Nov. 2, 2009]
Resumen Rápido sobre la Nueva Cobertura de

Medicare para Recetas Médicas para las 

personas con un Plan de Salud Medicare con

cobertura para recetas médicas.

Comenzando el 1 de enero de 2006, Medicare ofrecerá planes de recetas médicas para

todas las personas con Medicare. Planes privados, incluyendo los Planes de Salud de

Medicare (Medicare Advantage, Planes de Costo Medicare) y los planes de Medicare

para recetas médicas, estarán ofreciendo esta cobertura. Usted puede inscribirse en un

plan de Medicare para recetas médicas si está en un Plan Original de Medicare, un Plan

de Pago-por-Servicio, o en un Plan de Costo Medicare que no ofrece cobertura para

medicamentos.

Mucho de los Planes de Salud de Medicare (Medicare Advantage y Planes de Costo

Medicare) ya proveen algún tipo de cobertura para medicinas. Comenzando en el

2006, usted puede mantener la cobertura para medicamentos que ofrece su Plan de

Salud de Medicare, o puede inscribirse en otro plan.

¿Qué necesito saber?

• Usted tiene opciones para cómo usted obtendrá su cobertura de Medicare para

recetas médicas. 

• Usted recibirá un aviso de su Plan de Salud de Medicare durante el otoño sobre las

opciones de medicamentos recetados. Lea todos los materiales que reciba de su

plan cuidadosamente. 

• Puede revisar las opciones de otros Planes de Salud de Medicare, tales como

regresar al Plan Original de Medicare e inscribirse en un plan de Medicare para

recetas médicas.

• Compare sus opciones de planes y decida si prefiere mantener su plan actual o

inscribirse en un nuevo plan.

• Usted puede comenzar a inscribirse en un plan de Medicare para recetas médicas el

15 de noviembre de 2005.

★

★

★

CENTROS DE SERVICIOS DE MEDICARE & MEDICAID
¿Qué necesito saber? (continuación)

• Si usted no se inscribe en un plan de Medicare para recetas médicas antes del 15

de mayo de 2006, tendrá que pagar una prima más elevada cuando se inscriba

más tarde, a menos de que usted tenga, en promedio, una cobertura por lo

menos tan buena como la de Medicare para recetas médicas (como por ejemplo

la de su empleador o sindicato anterior). Su asegurador le notificará antes del

otoño si su cobertura en promedio, es por lo menos tan buena como la cobertura

estándar de Medicare para recetas médicas.

• Usted pudiese calificar para una ayuda adicional con los pagos de su cobertura

para recetas médicas si tiene ingresos y recursos limitados.

¿Cómo puedo conseguir más información? 

Información detallada estará disponible en octubre del 2005. Puede revisar el manual

de “Medicare y Usted 2006”, visitar www.medicare.gov por el Internet, o llamar

GRATIS al 1-800-MEDICARE (1-800-633-4227). Los usuarios del TTY deben

llamar al 1-877-486-2048. Para más información sobre la ayuda adicional con los

costos de medicinas y como solicitar la ayuda, llame a la Administración del Seguro

Social al 1-800-772-1213, o visite www.socialsecurity.gov por el Internet. 

Los usuarios del TTY deberán llamar al 1-800-325-0778.

Busque los eventos locales relacionados con Medicare.

★

CMS Pub. No. 11135-S

Julio 2005
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dale R. Trumbach, Appellant.

Submitted December 31, 2007;

decided January 8, 2008

Reported below, 31 AD3d 1054.

Motion for an extension of the time within which to apply for permission to appeal pursuant to CPL 460.20 granted and motion papers treated as a timely CPL 460.20 application.
§ 110.105 Responsibility and power of the presiding officer in an oral hearing. ( a ) The presiding officer in any oral hearing shall conduct a fair hearing, develop a record that will contribute to informed decisionmaking, and, within the framework of the Commission's orders, have the power necessary to achieve these ends, including the power to: ( 1 ) Take action to avoid unnecessary delay and maintain order;
( 2 ) Dispose of procedural requests;
( 3 ) Question participants and witnesses, and entertain suggestions as to questions which may be asked of participants and witnessess;
( 4 ) Order consolidation of participants;
( 5 ) Establish the order of presentation;
( 6 ) Hold conferences before or during the hearing;
( 7 ) Establish reasonable time limits;
( 8 ) Limit the number of witnesses; and
( 9 ) Strike or reject duplicative or irrelevant presentations.
( b ) Where the Commission itself does not preside: ( 1 ) The presiding officer may certify questions or refer rulings to the Commission for decision;
( 2 ) Any hearing order may be modified by the Commission; and
( 3 ) The presiding officer will certify the completed hearing record to the Commission, which may then issue its opinion on the hearing or provide that additional testimony be presented.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of--

Connectec Company, Inc. 

Under Contract No. W9098S-12-P-0321 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 58905 

Ms. Lora Taleb 

President 

Raymond M. Saunders, Esq. 

Army Chief Trial Attorney 

CPT Evan C. Williams, JA 

Trial Attorney 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute which is the subject of the appeal having been settled, the appeal is 

hereby dismissed with prejudice subject to reinstatement only in the event the settlement 

is not consummated. Any request to reinstate the subject appeal must be filed within one 

year of the date of this Order. 

Dated: 27 January 2015 

dministrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 58905, Appeal of Connectec 

Company, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 3:06CR208-MEF

 )

JASON EDWARD COFIELD )

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO DISMISS INDICTMENT

Comes now the United States of America by and through its Attorney for the Middle District

of Alabama and moves the Court for leave to dismiss the Indictment theretofore filed on August 15,

2007, in the above styled cause, on the following grounds, to wit: 

The interest of justice.

Respectfully submitted this the 5th day of October, 2007.

Respectfully submitted,

LEURA G. CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/ Verne H. Speirs

VERNE H. SPEIRS

Assistant United States Attorney

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Telephone: (334) 223-7280

Fax: (334) 223-7135

Case 3:06-cr-00208-MEF-CSC Document 75 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 1 of 2
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 3:06CR208-MEF

 )

JASON EDWARD COFIELD )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on October 5, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing with the

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the

following: Pate DeBardeleben, 2835 Zelda Road, Montgomery, Al 36106. 

Respectfully submitted,

 LEURA G. CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/ Verne H. Speirs

VERNE H. SPEIRS

Assistant United States Attorney

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Telephone: (334) 223-7280

Fax: (334) 223-7135

Case 3:06-cr-00208-MEF-CSC Document 75 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 3 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 1 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 3 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 2 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 3 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 3 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 3 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 4 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 3 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 5 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 3 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 6 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 3 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 7 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 3 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 8 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 3 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 9 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 3 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 10 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 3 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 11 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 3 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 12 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 3 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 13 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 3 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 14 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 3 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 15 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 3 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 16 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 3 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 17 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 3 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 18 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 3 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 19 of 19
# Subpart 311.70 - Section 508 Accessibility Standards

**Parent topic:**PART 311 - DESCRIBING AGENCY NEEDS

## 311.7000 Defining electronic and information technology requirements.

The contracting officer shall ensure that requiring activities specify agency needs for electronic and information technology (EIT) supplies and services, and document market research, document EIT requirements, and identify the applicable Section 508 accessibility standards. See FAR 11.002(f) and HHSAR subpart 339.2.
#### § 925.12 Fiscal period.

*Fiscal period* is synonymous with *fiscal year* and means the 12 month period beginning on December 1 of one year and ending the last day of November of the following year or such other period as the committee, with the approval of the Secretary, may prescribe.
#### § 948.21 Recommendations for regulations.

An area committee upon complying with the requirements of § 948.20 may recommend regulations, or modifications, suspension or termination thereof, to the Secretary whenever it finds that such regulations as provided for in this subpart will tend to effectuate the declared policies of the act.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       3,290,862
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  894,132
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (33,589)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      82,929,733
<DEPRECIATION>                            (51,690,518)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,400,721
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,931,543
<BONDS>                                     25,179,765
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,289,413
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,400,721
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,581,019
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,241,558
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                53,325
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             901,978
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,384,158
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,384,158
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,384,158
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    13.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    13.18
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Martha L. Long, certifythat:

1.    I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of National Property Investors8;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financialreporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), for theregistrant and have: 

 

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b)  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reportingand the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordancewith generally accepted accounting principles;

 

(c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report on Form 10-K of Heelys, Inc. (the “Company”)for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Michael G.Staffaroni, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael W. Hessong,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, toour knowledge, that:

(1)         The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:March 15, 2007

| By:    |   | /s/ MICHAEL G. STAFFARONI |   |   |
|--------|--------|---------------------------|--------|--------|
|   |   | Michael G. Staffaroni     |   |   |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer   |   |   |

 

| By:    |   | /s/ MICHAEL W. HESSONG  |   |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|--------|
|   |   | Michael W. Hessong      |   |   |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer |   |   |

 

----
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 11, 2015.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-14-00726-CR

RICHARD ANTHONY SCOTT, Appellant 

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 184th District Court 

Harris County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 1372902 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

Appellant entered a plea of guilty to aggravated assault of a family member

without an agreed punishment recommendation. On August 19, 2014, the trial 

court sentenced appellant to confinement for sixteen years in the Institutional 

Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a timely 

notice of appeal.
2

Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal 

is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirement of Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a professional 

evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to 

be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). 

A copy of counsel’s brief and the record was delivered to appellant. 

Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se 

response. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). As 

of this date, no pro se response has been filed.

We have carefully reviewed the record, counsel’s brief, and appellant’s 

response, and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we 

find no reversible error in the record. A discussion of the brief would add nothing 

to the jurisprudence of the state. We are not to address the merits of each claim 

raised in an Anders brief or a pro se response when we have determined there are 

no arguable grounds for review. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2005). 

 Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. 

 PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Brown and Wise.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Case 2:06-mj-00071-DRB Document 7 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 1 of 1
###### Editorial Note on Part 1046

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1046 appear at 88 FR 41295, June 26, 2023.

#### § 1046.1 Purpose.

This part establishes the medical, physical readiness, training and performance standards for contractor protective force (PF) personnel who provide security services at Department of Energy (DOE or Department) facilities including the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). DOE and NNSA may choose to incorporate elements of these standards into Federal protective force programs.
§ 1014.3 Administrative claim; who may file. ( a ) A claim for injury to or loss of property may be presented by the owner of the property interest that is the subject of the claim or the owner's duly authorized agent or legal representative.
( b ) A claim for personal injury may be presented by the injured person or the claimant's duly authorized agent or legal representative.
( c ) A claim based on death may be presented by the executor or administrator of the decedent's estate or by any other person legally entitled to assert such a claim under the applicable State law.
( d ) A claim for a loss that was wholly compensated by an insurer with the rights of a subrogee may be presented by the insurer. A claim for loss that was partially compensated by an insurer with the rights of a subrogee may be presented by the insurer or the insured individually, as their respective interests appear, or jointly. Whenever an insurer presents a claim asserting the rights of a subrogee, it shall present with its claim appropriate evidence that it has the rights of a subrogee.
( e ) A claim presented by an agent or legal representative shall be presented in the name of the claimant, be signed by the agent or legal representative, show the title or legal capacity of the person signing, and be accompanied by evidence of authority to present a claim on behalf of the claimant.
#### John Melnyk v. United States Lines Co.

Motion for reargument or for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted to the extent that this court, pursuant to CPLR 5713, states that questions of law have arisen which ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals. Concur — Eager, J. P., Capozzoli, Tilzer, Markewich and Bastow, JJ.
1643.205-70 Contract clause.       The clause set forth in section 1652.243–70 shall be inserted in all FEHB Program contracts.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1643.2—Changes