alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
645.107-70 DOSAR contract clause and solicitation provision.       (a) The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 652.245–70, Status of Property Management System, in solicitations when any of the following conditions apply:          (1) Highway motor vehicles or aircraft, regardless of cost, are provided by the Government or acquired by the contractor for the account of the Government;          (2) Software exceeding $500,000 in value, including labor costs to develop, is provided by the Government or acquired by the contractor for the account of the Government; or          (3) Personal property greater than $25,000 (and not in paragraph (a)(1) of this subsection) is provided by the Government or acquired by the contractor for the account of the Government. The personal property must be complete within itself; does not lose its identity or become a component part of other property when put into use; and is of a durable nature with an estimated useful life expectancy to exceed two years.          (b) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 652.245–71, Special Reports of Government Property, in all solicitations and contracts that contain the provision at 652.245–70.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 645.1—General
632.006 Reduction or suspension of contract

payments upon finding of fraud.

Parent topic: PART 632—CONTRACT FINANCING
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 15a0033n.06

Case No. 14-5855

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

CHARLES SCARBOROUGH,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED 

STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR 

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF 

TENNESSEE

BEFORE: GIBBONS and COOK, Circuit Judges; GWIN, District Judge.*

PER CURIAM. A magistrate judge found Charles Scarborough guilty of threatening and 

intimidating a forest officer. See 36 C.F.R. § 261.3(a) (“Threatening, resisting, intimidating, or 

interfering with any forest officer engaged in or on account of the performance of his official 

duties in the protection, improvement, or administration of the National Forest System is 

prohibited.”). On initial appeal under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 58, the district court 

found the evidence sufficient to sustain the colleague conviction and affirmed. Scarborough now 

reasserts his sufficiency-of-the-evidence challenge before this court. We find that the district 

court’s opinion diligently and correctly sets out the undisputed facts and the governing law.

 

*

The Honorable James S. Gwin, United States District Judge for the Northern District of 

Ohio, sitting by designation.
Case No. 14-5855

United States v. Scarborough

- 2 -

Scarborough offers only one new argument on appeal—that intimidation is merely a 

species of true threat, and because “the magistrate judge specifically found that Mr. Scarborough 

did not threaten Ms. Hawkins, this Court should find, without more, that the evidence failed to 

establish that Mr. Scarborough intimidated Ms. Hawkins.” Yet as the Ninth Circuit noted when 

faced with a similar challenge, “‘threatening, resisting, intimidating, or intentionally interfering’

are stated disjunctively so that proof of any one of the acts alone constitutes an offense.” United 

States v. Bucher, 375 F.3d 929, 933 (9th Cir. 2004). Scarborough fails to persuade us to depart 

from our sister circuit’s reasoning that one may intimidate a forest officer without necessarily 

threatening her. See United States v. Hoff, 22 F.3d 222, 223–24 (9th Cir. 1994) (affirming 

conviction where the lower court found that the defendant “intimidated” a forest officer “but did 

not threaten or assault her”).

Because this court’s issuance of a full opinion would be duplicative and serve no 

jurisprudential purpose, we AFFIRM Scarborough’s conviction on the basis of the district 

court’s well-reasoned opinion of June 12, 2014.
Subpart 604.2—Contract Distribution

Source: 80 FR 6915, Feb. 9, 2015, unless otherwise noted.

Parent topic: PART 604—ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS

604.202 Agency distribution requirements.

As necessary, the contracting officer shall distribute copies of the signed contract or modification to

those officers/offices involved in contract administrative support functions, e.g., the Contracting

Officer's Representative; the requirements office; the Post Occupational Safety and Health Officer

(POSHO); the Despatch Agent or other receiving activity, particularly if it is the initial point of

contact for receipt of goods or services; the financial management office; and each post or office

where the contract shall be performed. Where required by the laws of a foreign country, overseas

posts shall retain the original copy of the contract or modification awarded by a domestic

contracting activity for performance overseas. The contracting officer shall send copies of contracts

and modifications awarded as small business or 8(a) set-asides to OSDBU.
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 7 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 1 of 16
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 7 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 2 of 16
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 7 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 3 of 16
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 7 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 4 of 16
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 7 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 5 of 16
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 7 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 6 of 16
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 7 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 7 of 16
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 7 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 8 of 16
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 7 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 9 of 16
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 7 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 10 of 16
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 7 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 11 of 16
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 7 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 12 of 16
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 7 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 13 of 16
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 7 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 14 of 16
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 7 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 15 of 16
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 7 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 16 of 16
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 7-2 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 1 of 9
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 7-2 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 2 of 9
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 7-2 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 3 of 9
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 7-2 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 4 of 9
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 7-2 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 5 of 9
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 7-2 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 6 of 9
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 7-2 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 7 of 9
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 7-2 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 8 of 9
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 7-2 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 9 of 9
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John J. Daly, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Putnam County, imposed July 18, 1979, upon his conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, the sentence being an indeterminate prison term with a maximum of 15 years. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the maximum period of imprisonment to 10 years. As so modified, sentence affirmed. The sentence was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Damiani, J. P., Titone, Lazer and Mangano, JJ., concur.
Case 3:06-cv-00691-WHA-WC Document 8 Filed 08/28/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00691-WHA-WC Document 8 Filed 08/28/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00691-WHA-WC Document 8 Filed 08/28/2006 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 99.2


                                CERTIFICATION OF
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                     OF POLLUTION RESEARCH AND CONTROL CORP.


     This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly annual report on Form
10-QSB (the "Form 10-QSB") for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, of Pollution
Research and Control Corp. (the "Issuer").

     I, Michael Collins, the Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer certify that
to the best of my knowledge:

     (i)  the Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
          or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
          78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

     (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Issuer.

Dated:  August 19, 2002.


                                                    /S/ MICHAEL COLLINS
                                                   ----------------------------
                                                   Name: Michael Collins
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Sylvia Gessino, as Natural Parent and Guardian of John Gessino, an Infant, Respondent, v Vincent D’Andraia, Doing Business as Vinnie’s Suffolk Shell, Appellant, and Merchant’s Mutual Insurance Company, Respondent. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

— Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed May 18, 1979. A majority of the board found: "based on the credible evidence and the testimony of the claimant, that the claimant was of the *712belief that his activities in assisting the employer’s brother were at the impled *[sic]*request of, and for the benefit of the employer. Therefore, the ensuing injury constitutes an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment within the meaning of the Workers’ Compensation Law.” The board’s decision is supported by substantial evidence and must be affirmed. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workers’ Compensation Board against the employer. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Kane and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             345
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,661
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (35)
<INVENTORY>                                     19,302
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,437
<PP&E>                                           8,980
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,618)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  35,209
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,092
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           125
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,992
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    35,209
<SALES>                                         10,568
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,568
<CGS>                                            7,297
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,297
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,538
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 374
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (641)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (641)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (641)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

CINCINNATI INSURANCE )

COMPANY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 3:06cv733-MHT

) 

JOSEPH DONALD PRATHER )

and LINDA PRATHER, )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion to dismiss (doc. no. 4)

is denied.

DONE, this the 27th day of September, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 11 Filed 09/27/2006 Page 1 of 1
H. Res. 11

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

January 4, 2005.

Resolved, That the House has heard with profound sorrow of the death of the Honorable Robert T. Matsui, a Representative from the State of California.

Resolved, That a committee of such Members of the

House as the Speaker may designate, together with such

Members of the Senate as may be joined, be appointed to attend the funeral.

Resolved, That the Sergeant-at-Arms of the House be

authorized and directed to take such steps as may be necessary for carrying out the provisions of these resolutions and

that the necessary expenses in connection therewith be paid

out of applicable accounts of the House.

Resolved, That the Clerk communicate these resolutions

to the Senate and transmit a copy thereof to the family of

the deceased.
2

•HRES 11 EH

Resolved, That when the House adjourns today, it adjourn as a further mark of respect to the memory of the deceased.

Attest:

Clerk.
§ 959.84 Termination. ( a ) The Secretary may, at any time, terminate the provisions of this subpart by giving at least one day's notice by means of a press release or in any other manner which he may determine.
( b ) The Secretary shall terminate or suspend the operation of any or all of the provisions of this subpart whenever he finds that such provisions do not tend to effectuate the declared policy of the act.
( c ) The Secretary shall terminate the provisions of this subpart at the end of any fiscal period whenever he finds that such termination is favored by a majority of producers who, during a representative period, have been engaged in the production of onions for market: *Provided,* That such majority has, during such representative period, produced for market more than fifty percent of the volume of such onions produced for market.
( d ) The Secretary shall conduct a referendum within six years after the effective date of this paragraph and every sixth year thereafter to ascertain whether continuance is favored by producers. The Secretary would consider termination of this part if less than two-thirds of the growers voting in the referendum and growers of less than two-thirds of the volume of onions represented in the referendum favor continuance.
( e ) The provisions of this subpart shall, in any event, terminate whenever the provisions of the act authorizing them cease to be in effect.
[26 FR 704, Jan. 25, 1961, as amended at 73 FR 10976, Feb. 29, 2008]
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 44 Filed 02/15/2007 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 44 Filed 02/15/2007 Page 2 of 7
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 44 Filed 02/15/2007 Page 3 of 7
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 44 Filed 02/15/2007 Page 4 of 7
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 44 Filed 02/15/2007 Page 5 of 7
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 44 Filed 02/15/2007 Page 6 of 7
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 44 Filed 02/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 44-2 Filed 02/15/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 44-2 Filed 02/15/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 44-2 Filed 02/15/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 44-3 Filed 02/15/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 44-3 Filed 02/15/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 44-3 Filed 02/15/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 44-4 Filed 02/15/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 44-4 Filed 02/15/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 44-4 Filed 02/15/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 44-5 Filed 02/15/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 44-5 Filed 02/15/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 44-5 Filed 02/15/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 44-5 Filed 02/15/2007 Page 4 of 4
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 44-6 Filed 02/15/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 44-6 Filed 02/15/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 44-6 Filed 02/15/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 44-6 Filed 02/15/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 44-6 Filed 02/15/2007 Page 5 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 44-7 Filed 02/15/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 44-7 Filed 02/15/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 44-7 Filed 02/15/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 44-7 Filed 02/15/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 44-7 Filed 02/15/2007 Page 5 of 5
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of  Rent-A-Wreck of America,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kenneth
L. Blum, Sr., Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to my knowledge as of the date hereof:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


/s/ Kenneth L. Blum, Sr.
------------------------
Kenneth L. Blum, Sr.
Chief Executive Officer
August 19, 2002


This  certification  accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed  filed by the  Company  for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, :

:

PLAINTIFF, :

:

v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv736-WKW

:

SEVENTY FOUR THOUSAND SEVEN :

HUNDRED ($74,700) DOLLARS IN :

UNITED STATES CURRENCY, :

:

DEFENDANT. :

MOTION TO CONTINUE

Comes now the United States of America (United States), by and

through Leura G. Canary, United States Attorney, Middle District of

Alabama, and John T. Harmon, Assistant United States Attorney, and

states as follows:

1. A hearing on the Claimant’s Motion to Suppress is set for

June 26, 2007. The U.S. has been informed that at least three of

its potential witnesses for this hearing will be unavailable. Two

witnesses are set for travel during this period and one witness is

recovering from a medical procedure. The U.S. would also state

that the United States Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of

Alabama is scheduled to move to its new office during the week of

July 2-6, 2007.

Case 2:06-cv-00736-WKW-SRW Document 20 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 1 of 3
2. Accordingly, the U.S. moves the court to continue the

hearing for fourteen (14) days until July 10, 2007. Trial in this

matter is set for October 15, 2007. This continuance will not

cause any delay in this trial date.

Respectfully submitted this the 15th day of June, 2007.

FOR THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

 LEURA G. CANARY

/s/John T. Harmon 

John T. Harmon

Assistant United States Attorney

Office of the United States Attorney

Middle District of Alabama

One Court Square, Suite 201 (36104)

Post Office Box 197

Montgomery, Alabama 36101-0197

Telephone:(334) 223-7280

Facsimile:(334) 223-7560

E-mail: John.Harmon@usdoj.gov

Case 2:06-cv-00736-WKW-SRW Document 20 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on January 8, 2007, I electronically

filed the foregoing Motion to Continue Pretrial Date with the Clerk

of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification

of such filing to the following: Bruce Maddox.

/s/John T. Harmon 

John T. Harmon

Assistant United States Attorney

Case 2:06-cv-00736-WKW-SRW Document 20 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 3 of 3
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0386 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. RYAN MITCHELL TUFF,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including May 8 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 29 2023

03/29/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0386
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No: 3:06: CV 733-DRB

)

JOSEPH DONALD PRATHER and )

LINDA PRATHER, )

)

Defendants. )

REPORT OF PARTIES MEDIATION STATUS

The parties to the instant case met on September 17, 2007 for purposes of discussing 

mediation. It was concluded that the parties would schedule a time and date for the mediation of

the case at hand and also attempt to resolve all issues dealing with this case and the companion

case that is presently pending in the Circuit Court of Chambers County, Alabama. A time and

date is to be mutually agree upon in the near future in hopes that all issues can be resolved. 

Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ Timothy L. Dillard 

Timothy L. Dillard

Attorney for the Defendants

DILLARD & ASSOCIATES, L.L.C

Fourth Floor, Berry Building

2015 Second Avenue North

Birmingham, Alabama 35203

Telephone: (205) 251-2823

Fax: (205) 251-3832

Email: dillardandassoc@aol.com

Bar Number: ASB-1618-D63T

Of Counsel:

Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 30 Filed 09/19/2007 Page 1 of 2
Stephen Heninger

HENINGER, GARRISON & DAVIS, L.L.C

PO Box 13110

Birmingham, Alabama 35202

steve@hgdlawfirm.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this the 19th day of September, 2007, I electronically filed the

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of

such filing to the following:

Jennifer T. Dewees

2001 Park Place North, Suite 911

Birmingham, Alabama 35203

jennifer_dewees@staffdefense.com

/s/ Timothy L. Dillard 

Of Counsel

Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 30 Filed 09/19/2007 Page 2 of 2
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

DELOISE PRICE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv721-MHT

) 

WAL-MART STORES, INC., and )

EXTREME PERFORMANCE, INC., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED as follows:

(1) The motion to allow additional time (Doc. No.

27) is granted.

(2) The motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 24) is reset

for submission, without oral argument, on

September 4, 2007, with all briefs due by said

date.

DONE, this the 21st day of August, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00721-MHT-TFM Document 28 Filed 08/21/2007 Page 1 of 1
323.7103 Solicitation Provision.

The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 352.223-71, Instruction to Offerors - Sustainable

Acquisition, in solicitations above the micro-purchase threshold when the acquisition utilizes a

product or service code designated by HHS as having sustainable acquisition attributes.

Parent topic: Subpart 323.71 - Sustainable Acquisition Requirements
160 So.2d 226

#### Cecile E. THIBERVILLE v. E. W. VACHER.

No. 47111.

Feb. 7, 1964.

In re: Howard C. Ratcliff et al. applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 159 So.2d 24.

Writ denied. The result reached by the Court of Appeal is correct.