alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3541 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain unbleached printcloth. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 20, 2006 

Mr. GRAHAM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain unbleached 

printcloth. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN UNBLEACHED PRINTCLOTH. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.52.12 Unbleached printcloth, greater than or 

equal to 85 percent by weight of cotton, 

greater than 100 g/m2 but less than or 

equal to 200 g/m2, of average yarn, number 43 to 68, of width exceeding 225 

centimeters (provided for in subheading 

5208.12.60) ............................................. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 3541 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
#### Thames Shipyard and Repair Co. *v.*Earl E. Willametz

Bogdanski, C. J., Peters, Healey, Parskey and Armentano, Js.

Argued April 3

decision released May 12, 1981

*Raphael Korff,*for the appellant (defendant).

*Richard Grushin,*for the appellee (plaintiff).

*214Per Curiam.

The plaintiff brought this aetion seeking to recover an agreed upon price for services rendered in salvaging a sailboat which had foundered on the rocks of Long Island Sound. In his answer to the complaint, the defendant filed a counterclaim for damages alleging that because the plaintiff failed in timely fashion to perform its part of the agreement, the boat suffered considerable additional damage due to bad weather. The trial court found the issues for the defendant on the complaint and for the plaintiff on the counterclaim. From that part of the judgment pertaining to the counterclaim, the defendant has appealed.

It is undisputed that on September 24, 1973, the defendant purchased, for $500, a wooden sailboat which was grounded on the rocks off Madison, Connecticut. The defendant and the plaintiff then entered into an agreement whereby the plaintiff would raise the boat and tow it to a designated harbor. The plaintiff subsequently raised the boat and towed it to the agreed upon location. On his appeal the defendant claims that because the salvage job was not done timely, the defendant was entitled to substantial damages.

The sole issue on the appeal is whether the trial court erred in refusing to award damages on the counterclaim.

We have reviewed all of the trial court proceedings and, after considering the arguments and briefs of the parties, we conclude there was no error in the appeal from the judgment which found the issues in favor of the plaintiff on the counterclaim. The lengthy and meticulous memorandum of decision filed by the trial court; *Thames Shipyard & Repair Co.*v. *Willametz,*37 Conn. Sup. 19, 428 A.2d 1143*215(1978); fully discusses the claims of the defendant. Because it would serve no useful purpose to reiterate them here, we formally adopt the trial court’s decision as a statement of the facts and the applicable law.

There is no error.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-51040

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RAFAEL LUCERO-SALAS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-01-CR-1019-ALL-DB

--------------------

April 11, 2002

Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Rafael Lucero-Salas appeals the sentence imposed following

his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States

after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Lucero-Salas

contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) define

separate offenses. He argues that the aggravated felony

conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element

of the offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) that should have been

alleged in his indictment. Lucero-Salas maintains that he

pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry
No. 01-51040 

-2-

under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds

the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed

for that offense. 

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Lucero-Salas acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1202 (2001). This court

must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court

itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984

(internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of

the district court is AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an

appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

 AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

WILLIE McNAIR, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff / Counter-Defendant, ) 

 ) 

v. ) 

 ) No. 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-SRW 

RICHARD ALLEN, et al., ) 

 ) 

 Defendants / Counter-plaintiffs. ) 

------------------------------------------------------- 

JAMES CALLAHAN, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff / Counter-Defendant, ) 

 ) 

v. ) 

 ) No. 2:06-cv-00919-WKW-SRW

RICHARD ALLEN, et al., ) 

 ) 

 Defendants / Counter-plaintiffs. ) 

DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF FILING 

Defendants, Richard Allen, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the 

Alabama Department of Corrections, and Grantt Culliver, in his official capacity as 

Warden of the Holman Correctional Facility, through counsel, hereby give notice 

that the Alabama Supreme Court has set January 31, 2008, as the execution date 

for James Harvey Callahan. That order, which is filed with this notice, was entered 

Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 133 Filed 11/01/2007 Page 1 of 3
2

on October 31, 2007. 

Respectfully submitted, 

 Troy King 

 Alabama Attorney General 

 /s/ J. Clayton Crenshaw 

J. Clayton Crenshaw (CRE007)

James W. Davis (DAV103)

Corey L. Maze (MAZ003) 

Jasper B. Roberts, Jr. (ROB157) 

Assistant Attorneys General

Office of the Attorney General 

Alabama State House 

11 South Union Street 

Montgomery, AL 36130 

(334) 242-7300 Office 

(334) 353-3637 Fax 

Email: ccrenshaw@ago.state.al.us 

 jimdavis@ago.state.al.us 

 cmaze@ago.state.al.us 

 jroberts@ago.state.al.us 

Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 133 Filed 11/01/2007 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on the 1st day of November, 2007, a copy of the 

foregoing has been electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using the 

CM/ECF system, which will electronically send a copy of the same to the 

following: Anne E. Borelli and Thomas M. Goggans. 

 /s/ J. Clayton Crenshaw 

 J. Clayton Crenshaw 

 Assistant Attorney General 

ADDRESS OF COUNSEL: 

Office of the Attorney General 

Alabama State House 

11 South Union Street 

Montgomery, AL 36130 

(334) 242-7300 Office 

(334) 353-3637 Fax 

Email: ccrenshaw@ago.state.al.us 

 jimdavis@ago.state.al.us 

 cmaze@ago.state.al.us 

 jroberts@ago.state.al.us 

Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 133 Filed 11/01/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 133-2 Filed 11/01/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 133-2 Filed 11/01/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 133-2 Filed 11/01/2007 Page 3 of 3
**B F**  IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 1 - 0 325 STATE OF MONTANA ,

Plaintiff and Appellee , v. AUSTIN ALLEN MILLARD ,

Defendant and Appellant .

**GRANT OF EXTENSION** Upon consideration of Appellee ’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including December 11 202 2 , within which to prepare, file, and serve its response brief

.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court November 9 2022

11/09/2022
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3396 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain girls’ water resistant pants. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 6, 2006 

Mr. DEMINT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain girls’ water 

resistant pants. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN GIRLS’ WATER RESISTANT PANTS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.— 

5 (1) Chapter 61 of the Harmonized Tariff 

6 Schedule of the United States is amended by insert7 ing in numerical sequence, the following statistical 

8 note: 

9 ‘‘7. For the purposes of subheadings 6103.43.15, 

10 6104.63.20, and 6113.00.90, the term ‘performance out11 erwear pants’ means ankle length pants of water resistant 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•S 3396 IS 

1 synthetic fabrics, containing at least two of the following 

2 characteristics: side openings, sealed seams at the front 

3 (up to the zipper or other means of closure) and the back 

4 rise, insulation for cold weather protection, at least one 

5 pocket with a means of closure (zippered or hook and loop 

6 enclosed pockets or other type of enclosed pockets), scuff 

7 guards, elasticized or drawstring weather closure around 

8 the waist or ankles, articulated knees, or reinforcement 

9 in the seat or knees. The term ‘water resistant’ means 

10 a garment, notwithstanding classification, that would oth11 erwise pass the test for water resistance described in U.S. 

12 note 2 to chapter 62. The term ‘sealed seams’ means a 

13 seam that is sealed by means of taping, gluing, bonding, 

14 cementing, or similar processes for the purpose of water15 proofing the seam.’’. 

16 (2) Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Har17 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

18 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the fol19 lowing new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.61.05 Girls’ performance outerwear pants containing 5 percent or more by weight of 

elastomeric yarn or rubber thread described in statistical note 7 to chapter 61 

(provided for in subheading 6104.63.20) Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

20 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

21 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
3 

•S 3396 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
# Subpart 1430.2 - CAS Program Requirements

**Parent topic:**PART 1430 - COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ADMINISTRATION

## 1430.201 Contract requirements.

## 1430.201-5 Waiver.

The CO shall prepare requests to waive contractor compliance with CAS prescribed in FAR 30.201-5 and 48 CFR 9903.201-5(e) (FAR Appendix). The CO shall submit the request for waiver to the Director, PAM, without the power of redelegation, for a determination. PAM must report any waivers granted on a fiscal year basis to the CASB in accordance with FAR 30.201-5(e).   

## 1430.202 Disclosure requirements.

## 1430.202-2 Impracticality of submission.

The CO shall prepare any request to award a contract without the required contractor submission of the Form No. CASB-DS-1, Disclosure Statement, and submit it through the HCA, to the Director, PAM, and to the Secretary for approval. The Secretary, without the power of redelegation, must file a report to CASB within 30 days in accordance with 48 CFR 9903.202-2 (FAR Appendix).
H. Res. 147

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

March 16, 2005.

Resolved,

SECTION 1. ELECTION OF MEMBERS TO JOINT COMMITTEE ON

PRINTING.

The following Members are hereby elected to the Joint

Committee on Printing, to serve with the chair of the Committee on House Administration:

(1) Mr. Doolittle.

(2) Mr. Reynolds.

(3) Ms. Millender-McDonald.

(4) Mr. Brady of Pennsylvania.

SEC. 2. ELECTION OF MEMBERS TO JOINT COMMITTEE OF CONGRESS ON THE LIBRARY.

The following Members are hereby elected to the Joint

Committee of Congress on the Library, to serve with the

chair of the Committee on House Administration:

(1) Mr. Ehlers.

(2) Mrs. Miller of Michigan.

(3) Ms. Millender-McDonald.
2

•HRES 147 EH

(4) Ms. Zoe Lofgren of California.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 31.2CERTIFICATIONI, Douglas McClain, Jr., certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Immunosyn Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: March 30, 2007 /s/ Douglas McClain, Jr.     Douglas McClain, Jr.    Chief Financial and Accounting Officer  
49
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 25 Filed 12/04/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 25 Filed 12/04/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 25 Filed 12/04/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 25 Filed 12/04/2006 Page 4 of 4
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 25-2 Filed 12/04/2006 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 25-2 Filed 12/04/2006 Page 2 of 8
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 25-2 Filed 12/04/2006 Page 3 of 8
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 25-2 Filed 12/04/2006 Page 4 of 8
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 25-2 Filed 12/04/2006 Page 5 of 8
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 25-2 Filed 12/04/2006 Page 6 of 8
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 25-2 Filed 12/04/2006 Page 7 of 8
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 25-2 Filed 12/04/2006 Page 8 of 8
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 25-3 Filed 12/04/2006 Page 1 of 12
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 25-3 Filed 12/04/2006 Page 2 of 12
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 25-3 Filed 12/04/2006 Page 3 of 12
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 25-3 Filed 12/04/2006 Page 4 of 12
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 25-3 Filed 12/04/2006 Page 5 of 12
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 25-3 Filed 12/04/2006 Page 6 of 12
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 25-3 Filed 12/04/2006 Page 7 of 12
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 25-3 Filed 12/04/2006 Page 8 of 12
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 25-3 Filed 12/04/2006 Page 9 of 12
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 25-3 Filed 12/04/2006 Page 10 of 12
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 25-3 Filed 12/04/2006 Page 11 of 12
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 25-3 Filed 12/04/2006 Page 12 of 12
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 25-4 Filed 12/04/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 25-4 Filed 12/04/2006 Page 2 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 17

- 14807

________________________ D.C. Docket No s . 0:16

- cv - 61367

- DMM ; 0:13

- cr - 60006

- DMM

- 1

JEAN EVANS ANTOINE, Petitioner

- Appellant,

versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent

- Appellee.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern D istrict of Florida

________________________ (August 2, 2019) Before WILLIAM PRYOR and NEWSOM, Circuit Judges, and VRATIL, * District Judge.

* Honorable Kathryn H. Vratil, United States District Judge for the District of Kansas, sitting by designation. Case: 17-14807 Date Filed: 08/02/2019 Page: 1 of 32 PER CURIAM: Jean Antoine, a federal prisoner proceeding with counsel, appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 mo tion to vacate , in which he argued that Johnson v. United States , 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015) , invalidated his 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) conviction ( predicated on a conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery offense )

. The district court granted a certificate of appealability on the issue of whether Johnson applies to § 924(c)(3)(B). While his appeal was pending, the Supreme Court decided United States v.
Davis , in which it held that § 924(c)(3) ’s residual clause is un constitutionally vague. 139 S. Ct. 2319, 2323, 2336 (2019). And we held in a published order that
Davis announced “a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable,” 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h)(2). In re Hammoud , — F.3d

— , No. 19

- 12458, slip op. at 4

– 8 (11th Cir. July 23, 2019). Because the district court did n’ t have the benefit of these decisions when adjudicating Antoine’s § 2255 motion , we vacate and remand so that the district court may reconsider , in light of these new precedents , whether Antoine is entitled to any § 2255 rel ief

. In addition to the issues the parties have raised up to now, t he district court may wish to consider whether it makes sense to permit Antoine to amend his motion in light of Davis

. W e express no opinion about this or any other issue.

Case: 17-14807 Date Filed: 08/02/2019 Page: 2 of 33 VACATED AN D REMANDED. Case: 17-14807 Date Filed: 08/02/2019 Page: 3 of 3
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Somsak Chivavibul,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
covered by this report on Form 10-K of SLM Student Loan Trust 2012-7 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my
knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as indenture trustee.

[Signature Page Follows]



---

Date: March 30, 2016



|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ SOMSAK CHIVAVIBUL                                                
|Somsak Chivavibul                                                    
|President and Chief Financial Officer (Senior
Securitization Officer)
|Navient Funding, LLC