**UNITED
      STATES**


**SECURITIES
      AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION**


**Washington,
      D.C. 20549**








**FORM
      10-K**








**[X]
      ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
      OF
      1934**





For
      the
      fiscal year ended December 31, 2006


or





**[  
      ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND
      EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**





For
      the
      transition period from ________to _______





Commission
      file number: 333-136741-02




C-BASS
      2006-CB7 TRUST


(Exact
      name of issuing entity as specified in its charter)




BOND
      SECURITIZATION, L.L.C.


(Exact
      name of registrant/depositor as specified in its charter)




CREDIT-BASED
        ASSET SERVICING AND SECURITIZATION LLC
 (Exact
        name of sponsor as specified in its charter)


Delaware
            
            36-4449120(State
                or other jurisdiction of
              incorporation
                or organization)
            
            (I.R.S.
                Employer
              Identification
                No.)




1
          Bank
          One Plaza, Chicago, Illinois 60670
 (Address
          of issuing entity’s principal executive offices)
 
 (312)
          732-4000
 (Issuing
          entity's telephone number, including area code)
  Securities
        registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:




None




Securities
      registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:




None




Indicate
      by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined
      in
      Rule 405 of the Securities Act.





oYes
            
            x No





Indicate
      by check mark if the registrant is not required to file pursuant to Section
      13
      or Section 15(d) of the Act.





oYes
            
            xNo





Indicate
      by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
      be
      filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
      the
      preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
      to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
      for
      the past 90 days.





xYes
            
            oNo





Indicate
      by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
      Regulation S K (§229.405
      of this
      chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of
      registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
      incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to
      this
      Form 10-K.




Not
      Applicable





Indicate
      by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
      accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated
      filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check
      one):




Large
                accelerated filero
            Accelerated
                filero
            Non-accelerated
                filerx




Indicate
      by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
      12b-2 of the Act).   oYes     xNo




State
      the
      aggregate market value of the voting and non voting common equity held by
      non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity
      was
      last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of
      the
      last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal
      quarter.





Not
      Applicable




**DOCUMENTS
      INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE**




Not
      Applicable




**PART
        I**
  Item
        1.
        Business.
 Not
          Applicable
 **Item
        1A. Risk Factors.**
 Not
        Applicable
 
 **Item
        1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.**
 None.
  **Item
        2. Properties.**
 Not
        Applicable
 **Item
        3. Legal Proceedings.**
 Not
        Applicable
 **Item
        4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.**
 Not
        Applicable
 
 
 **PART
        II**
 
 **Item
        5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
        Purchases of Equity Securities.**
 Not
        Applicable
 
 **Item
        6. Selected Financial Data.**
 Not
        Applicable
 
 **Item
        7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
        Operation.**
 Not
        Applicable
 
 **Item
        7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
        Risk.**
 Not
        Applicable
 
 **Item
        8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.**
 Not
        Applicable
 
 **Item
        9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial
        Disclosure.**
 Not
        Applicable
 
 **Item
        9A. Controls and Procedures.**
 Not
        Applicable
  **Item
          9A(T). Controls and Procedures.**
 Not
          Applicable
  **Item
        9B. Other Information.**
 None.
 
 **PART
        III**
 
 **Item
        10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant.**
 Not
        Applicable
 
 **Item
        11. Executive Compensation.**
 Not
        Applicable
 
 **Item
        12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
        Stockholder Matters.**
 Not
        Applicable
 
 **Item
        13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.**
 Not
        Applicable
 
 **Item
        14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.**
 Not
        Applicable
 **ADDITIONAL
          DISCLOSURE ITEMS PURSUANT TO GENERAL INSTRUCTION J**
  **Item
        1112(b) of Regulation AB. Significant Obligors Financial
        Information.**
 Not
        Applicable.
  **Item
        1114(b)(2) and 1115(b) of Regulation AB. Significant Enhancement Provider
        Financial Information.**
 Not
          Applicable
 **Item
        1117 of Regulation AB. Legal Proceedings**
 ***Legal
            Proceedings***
  The
            following information (other than the final sentence) has been provided
            to the
            Depositor by New Century Mortgage Corporation (“New Century Mortgage”), an
            indirect wholly owned subsidiary of New Century Financial Corporation
            (the
“Company”).
 
 Securities
            Class Action Litigation
  On
            February 8, 2007, Avi Gold filed a securities class action complaint
            in the
            United States District Court for the Central District of California against
            the
            Company and certain of its directors and officers (the “Original Complaint”).
            The Original Complaint alleges that defendants violated federal securities
            laws
            by issuing false and misleading statements and failing to disclose material
            facts about the Company, which resulted in artificially inflated market
            prices
            of the Company’s common stock. The purported class period is between April 7,
            2006 and February 7, 2007. The Original Complaint seeks money damages
            in favor
            of its purported class of purchasers of the Company’s securities, the costs and
            expenses of the action and other relief that may be granted by the
            court.
  The
            Company has also learned that seventeen additional purported class actions
            were
            filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of
            California
            between February 8, 2007 and March 16, 2007. These complaints, some of
            which the
            Company has not yet been served with and which name the Company and certain
            of
            its officers and directors as defendants, present in large degree the
            same legal
            and factual issues as the Original Complaint and allege various class
            periods,
            the longest of which is from April 7, 2006 to March 2, 2007. One of these
            class
            actions has been brought on behalf of the holders of the Company’s 9.125% Series
            A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”) and the
            holders of the Company’s 9.75% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock
            (“Series B Preferred Stock”). Another of these class actions has been brought on
            behalf of the holders of the Company’s Series B Preferred Stock. The Company
            anticipates that similar actions on behalf of holders of the Company’s common
            stock, Series A Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock may be filed
            in the
            future. The Company intends to review the allegations in these complaints
            and
            respond appropriately. The Company’s management intends to vigorously defend
            these claims; however, an unfavorable outcome in these cases or future
            securities class action cases could have a material adverse effect on
            the
            Company’s financial condition.
  Shareholder
            Derivative Complaint
  The
            Company was served with a shareholder derivative complaint on March 1,
            2007,
            filed in the Superior Court of California, County of Orange. The complaint
            alleges breach of fiduciary duty, abuse of control, gross mismanagement,
            waste
            of corporate assets, unjust enrichment, and violations of California
            Corporations Code 25402 and seeks damages for breach, disgorgement, equitable
            relief, costs and fees. The case is in the very preliminary stages.
  The
            Company has also learned that five additional shareholder derivative
            actions
            were filed in the Superior Court of California, County of Orange between
            February 8, 2007 and March 16, 2007 and two additional shareholder derivative
            actions were filed in the United States District Court for the Central
            District
            of California during this same time period. These complaints, some of
            which the
            Company has not yet been served with and which name the Company and certain
            of
            its officers and directors as defendants, present in large degree the
            same legal
            and factual issues as the original shareholder derivative complaint.
            The Company
            anticipates that similar actions may be filed in the future. The Company
            intends
            to review the allegations in these complaints and respond
            appropriately.
  U.S.
            Attorney’s Office Investigation
  On
            February 27, 2007, the Company received a letter from the United States
            Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California (the “U.S. Attorney’s
            Office”) indicating that it was conducting a criminal inquiry under the federal
            securities laws in connection with trading in the Company’s securities, as well
            as accounting errors regarding the Company’s allowance for repurchase losses.
            The Company has subsequently received a grand jury subpoena requesting
            production of certain documents. The Company intends to cooperate with
            the
            requests of the U.S. Attorney’s Office.
  SEC
            Investigation
  On
            March
            7, 2007, the Company received a letter from the Pacific Regional Office
            of the
            Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) requesting that NCFC preserve
            certain documents. On March 12, 2007, the Company received a letter from
            the
            staff of the Pacific Regional Office of the SEC stating that the staff
            was
            conducting a preliminary investigation involving the Company and requesting
            production of certain documents. The staff of the SEC had also previously
            requested a meeting with the Company to discuss the events leading up
            to the
            Company’s previous announcement of the need to restate certain of its historical
            financial statements. The Company intends to cooperate with the requests
            of the
            SEC.
  State
            Regulatory Actions
 
 The
            Company has been engaged in recent ongoing discussions with its state
            regulators
            regarding the Company’s funding constraints and the impact on consumers who are
            in various stages of the loan origination process with the Company. The
            Company
            has advised these regulators that it has ceased accepting loan applications.
            In
            addition, the Company has advised these regulators that at this time,
            the
            Company and its subsidiaries are unable to fund any mortgage loans, including
            mortgage loans for those consumers who were already in the loan origination
            process with the Company. The Company has been and is continuing to work
            cooperatively with these regulators to mitigate the impact on the affected
            consumers, including transferring pending loans and loan applications
            to other
            mortgage lenders. The Company has also been providing daily reports to
            its
            various regulators regarding the status of loans in process in their
            states, as
            well as responding to ad hoc information requests.
  The
            Company received cease and desist orders from the States of Massachusetts,
            New
            Hampshire, New Jersey and New York on March 13, 2007 (collectively, the
“March
            13 Orders”). New Century Mortgage additionally received a Suspension Order from
            the state of New York on March 13, 2007 (the “NCMC Suspension Order”). The NCMC
            Suspension Order suspends New Century Mortgage’s mortgage banking license in the
            State of New York for a period not to exceed 30 days, pending investigation.
            On
            March 14 and 15, 2007, the Company received additional cease and desist
            orders from the States of Connecticut, Maryland, Rhode Island and Tennessee
            (collectively, the “March 14-15 Orders”). The March 13 Orders and the
            March 14-15 Orders contain allegations that certain of the Company’s
            subsidiaries have engaged in violations of applicable state law, including,
            among others, failure to fund mortgage loans after closing. Additionally,
            on
            March 14, 2007, New Century Mortgage and Home123 entered into a Consent
            Agreement and Order with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department
            of Banking,
            Bureau of Supervision and Enforcement (the “Pennsylania Consent
            Agreement”).
 
 The
            March 13 Orders, the March 14-15 Orders and the Pennsylvania Consent
            Agreement restrain the Company’s subsidiaries from taking certain actions,
            including, among others, engaging in alleged violations of state law
            and taking
            new applications for mortgage loans in the relevant jurisdiction. The
            March 13
            Orders, the March 14-15 Orders and the Pennsylvania Consent Agreement also
            compel the subsidiaries to affirmatively take certain actions, including
            the
            creation of escrow accounts to hold any upfront fees collected in connection
            with pending mortgage applications, the transfer to other lenders of
            the
            outstanding mortgage applications and unfunded mortgage loans held by
            the
            subsidiaries, and the provision of regular information to the state regulators
            regarding the subsidiaries’ activities in the applicable state, including the
            status of all outstanding mortgage applications and unfunded mortgage
            loans in
            that state. The cease and desist order received from the Rhode Island
            Department
            of Business Regulation on March 14 suspends the licenses of one or more
            of the
            Company’s subsidiaries and seeks to assess administrative
            penalties.
 
 The
            Company and its subsidiaries requested hearings on the cease and desist
            orders
            issued by regulators in Maryland, Massachusetts, Connecticut and Rhode
            Island on
            March 23, 2007, and in Tennessee on March 27, 2007.
 
 On
            March 14, 2007, the Attorney General of Ohio and the Ohio Department of
            Commerce, Division of Financial Institution (together, the “State”) filed a
            lawsuit against the Company, New Century Mortgage and Home123 (collectively,
            the
“Defendants”) on March 14, 2007 in Ohio state court (the “Ohio Complaint”).
            The Ohio Complaint alleges that the Company has engaged in violations
            of
            applicable state law, including, among others, failure to fund mortgage
            loans
            after closing. Also on March 14, 2007, the court granted the State’s motion to
            enter a temporary restraining order, which was subsequently modified
            by the
            court on March 16, 2007, against the Defendants (as modified, the “TRO”). The
            TRO restrained the Defendants from taking certain actions, including,
            among
            others, (i) engaging in violations of state law, (ii) soliciting
            applicants and taking new applications for mortgage loans in Ohio and
            (iii) initiating, prosecuting or enforcing foreclosure actions in Ohio. The
            TRO required the parties to confer with respect to restrictions regarding
            foreclosure action and the sale, transfer or assignment of loans more
            than 60
            days delinquent. On March 26, 2007, the Defendants filed a Motion for
            Dissolution of Modified Temporary Restraining Order and Motion for an
            Emergency
            Hearing, and Opposition to a Preliminary Injunction. On March 28, 2007,
            the
            Defendants and the State reached agreement on a Stipulated Preliminary
            Injunction effective for 90 days and submitted it for court approval.
            The
            Stipulated Preliminary Injunction replaces the TRO and provides for a
            stay of
            the litigation for 90 days. The Stipulated Preliminary Injunction restrains
            the
            Defendants from taking certain actions, including, among others, engaging
            in
            alleged violations of state law and taking new applications for mortgage
            loans.
            The Stipulated Preliminary Injunction also compels the Defendants to
            take
            certain actions, including the transfer to other lenders of any outstanding
            mortgage applications and unfunded mortgage loans, the placement in escrow
            of
            any upfront fees collected in connection with pending mortgage applications,
            and
            the provision of regular information to the State regarding the Company’s
            activities in Ohio, including the status of all outstanding mortgage
            applications and unfunded mortgage loans. The Stipulated Preliminary
            Injunction
            also requires the Defendants to submit certain loans (and related information)
            as to which it intends to foreclose to the State for the State to review.
            The
            State may object to the Company proceeding with a particular foreclosure
            and if
            the Company is unable to convince the State to permit it to proceed,
            the
            foreclosure will not proceed for the duration of the Stipulated Preliminary
            Injunction. The Stipulated Preliminary Injunction also provides for the
            State to
            review and object to the Defendants selling, transferring or assigning
            certain
            loans that are more than 60 days delinquent.
 
 On
            March
            16, 2007, the Company received additional cease and desist orders from
            the State
            of California (the "California Orders") and certain of the Company’s
            subsidiaries entered into consent agreements with the State of Florida’s Office
            of Financial Regulation and the State of Washington’s Department of Financial
            Institutions, respectively, each dated March 16, 2007 (the "March 16
            Agreements"
            and together with the California Orders, the "March 16 Orders and Consent
            Agreements").
 
 The
            March
            16 Orders and Consent Agreements contain allegations that certain of
            the
            Company’s subsidiaries have engaged in violations of state law, including, among
            others, failure to fund mortgage loans after closing. The March 16 Orders
            and
            Consent Agreements restrain the Company’s subsidiaries from taking certain
            actions, including, among others, engaging in alleged violations of state
            law
            and taking new applications for mortgage loans in the relevant jurisdiction.
            The
            March 16 Orders and Consent Agreements also compel the subsidiaries to
            affirmatively take certain actions, including the creation of escrow
            accounts to
            hold any upfront fees collected in connection with pending mortgage
            applications, the transfer to other lenders of the outstanding mortgage
            applications and unfunded mortgage loans held by the subsidiaries, and
            the
            provision of regular information to the state regulators regarding the
            subsidiaries’ activities in the applicable state, including the status of all
            outstanding mortgage applications and unfunded mortgage loans in that
            state.
 
 On
            March
            16, 2007, Home123 received a suspension order (the "Home123 Suspension
            Order")
            from the State of New York Banking Department. The Home123 Suspension
            Order
            contains allegations similar to those included in the NCMC Suspension
            Order and
            further provides that Home123’s mortgage banking license in the State of New
            York has been suspended for a period not exceeding 30 days, pending
            investigation. The Company and Home123 are reviewing the Home123 Suspension
            Order and accordingly have not yet determined whether they will appeal
            all or
            any portion of the Home123 Suspension Order.
 
 On
            March
            20, 2007, the Company entered into a Combined Statement of Charges and
            Consent
            Order with the State of Iowa and a Consent Agreement and Order with the
            State of
            Maine Office of Consumer Credit Regulation, Department of Professional
            and
            Financial Regulation (together, the “March 20 Orders”). On March 21, 2007, the
            Company entered into a Consent Order with the State of Michigan, Department
            of
            Labor & Economic Growth, Office of Financial and Insurance Services and a
            Consent Order with the State of Wyoming Banking Commission (the “March 21
            Orders”). On March 23, 2007, the Company entered into a Consent Agreement and
            Order with the State of Idaho Department of Finance (the “March 23 Order”).
            Similar to the consent agreements described above, the March 20, 21 and
            23
            Orders contain allegations that certain of the Company’s subsidiaries have
            engaged in violations of state law, including, among others, failure
            to fund
            mortgage loans after closing. They restrain the Company’s subsidiaries from
            taking certain actions, including, among others, engaging in alleged
            violations
            of state law and taking new applications for mortgage loans in the relevant
            jurisdiction. They also compel the subsidiaries to affirmatively take
            certain
            actions, including the creation of escrow accounts to hold any upfront
            fees
            collected in connection with pending mortgage applications, the transfer
            to
            other lenders of the outstanding mortgage applications and unfunded mortgage
            loans held by the subsidiaries, and the provision of regular information
            to the
            state regulators regarding the subsidiaries’ activities in the applicable state,
            including the status of all outstanding mortgage applications and unfunded
            mortgage loans in that state.
 
 The
            Company anticipates that cease and desist orders will continue to be
            received by
            the Company and its subsidiaries from additional states in the future
            and that
            the Company and its subsidiaries may enter into additional consent agreements
            similar to those described above.
 
 The
            Company intends to continue to cooperate with its regulators in order
            to
            mitigate the impact on consumers resulting from the Company’s funding
            constraints.
 
 Under
            the
            terms of the pooling and servicing agreement the Sponsor makes all of
            the
            representations and warranties with respect to the Mortgage Loans. No
            originator makes any representations and warranties for the benefit of
            the
            certificateholders.
 **Item
        1119 of Regulation AB. Affiliations and Certain Relationships and Related
        Transactions**
 Provided
          previously in the prospectus supplement of the Registrant relating to the
          issuing entity and filed pursuant to Rule 424 of the Securities Act of
          1933, as
          amended.
  **Item
        1122 of Regulation AB. Compliance with Applicable Servicing
        Criteria.**
 See
            Item
            15, exhibits (33) and (34).
 The
          Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria for Litton
          Loan
          Servicing LP has disclosed material noncompliance with criteria
          1122(d)(2)(vii)(D), relating to reconciliations for asset backed securities
          related bank accounts, and 1122(d)(4)(ix), relating to adjustments to interest
          rates for pool assets with variable rates.
  **Item
        1123 of Regulation AB. Servicer Compliance Statement**
 See
        Item
        15, exhibit (35).
 
 **PART
        IV**
 
  **Item
        15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.**
 
 (a)
        The
        following is a list of documents filed as part of this Annual Report on Form
        10-K:
 (1)
        Not
        Applicable
 (2)
        Not
        Applicable
 (3) **Exhibit
                      Number**
                  **Description**4.1
                  Pooling
                      and Servicing Agreement (Filed as part of the Registrant's
                      Current Report
                      on Form 8-K/A filed on October 31, 2006)31
                  Sarbanes-Oxley
                      Certification33(a)
                  Report
                      on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
                      securities, Litton Loan Servicing LP, as Servicer33(b)
                  Report
                      on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
                      securities, LaSalle Bank National Association, as
                      Trustee33(c)
                  Report
                      on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
                      securities, The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as
                      Custodian34(a)
                  Attestation
                      report on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
                      for
                      asset-backed securities, Litton Loan Servicing LP,
                      as Servicer34(b)
                  Attestation
                      report on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
                      for
                      asset-backed securities, LaSalle Bank National Association,
                      as
                      Trustee34(c)
                  Attestation
                      report on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
                      for
                      asset-backed securities, The Bank of New York Trust Company,
                      N.A., as
                      Custodian35(a)
                  Servicer
                      compliance statement, Litton Loan Servicing LP,
                      as Servicer35(b)
                  Servicer
                      compliance statement, LaSalle Bank National Association, as
                      Trustee99.1
                  Interest
                      Rate Swap Agreement and Interest Rate Cap Agreement, including
                      the ISDA
                      Master Agreement, Schedule and Confirmations (filed as part
                      of the
                      Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 20,
                      2006)


(b)
          The
          exhibits required to be filed by Registrant pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation
          S-K:
 See
          item
          15(a)(3)





(c)
      Not
      Applicable





**SIGNATURES**





Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
      behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.




Litton
                  Loan Servicing LP, as ServicerMarch
                  29, 2007
              /s/
                  Elizabeth FolkBy: Elizabeth
                  FolkTitle: Chief
                  Financial Officer and Senior Vice President(senior
                officer in charge of the servicing
                function)


Supplemental
        information to be furnished with reports filed pursuant to section 15(d)
        of the
        Act by Registrants which have not registered securities pursuant to Section
        12
        of the Act.
  No
        annual
        report, proxy statement, form of proxy or other proxy soliciting material
        has
        been sent to certificateholders, and the registrant does not presently
        contemplate sending any such materials subsequent to the filing of this report.







**EXHIBIT
      INDEX** **Exhibit
                    Number**
                **Description**4.1
                Pooling
                    and Servicing Agreement (Filed as part of the Registrant's Current
                    Report
                    on Form 8-K/A filed on October 31, 2006)31
                Sarbanes-Oxley
                    Certification33(a)
                Report
                    on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
                    securities, Litton Loan Servicing LP, as Servicer33(b)
                Report
                    on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
                    securities, LaSalle Bank National Association, as
                    Trustee33(c)
                Report
                    on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
                    securities, The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as
                    Custodian34(a)
                Attestation
                    report on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
                    asset-backed securities, Litton Loan Servicing LP,
                    as Servicer34(b)
                Attestation
                    report on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
                    asset-backed securities, LaSalle Bank National Association, as
                    Trustee34(c)
                Attestation
                    report on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
                    asset-backed securities, The Bank of New York Trust Company,
                    N.A., as
                    Custodian35(a)
                Servicer
                    compliance statement, Litton Loan Servicing LP,
                    as Servicer35(b)
                Servicer
                    compliance statement, LaSalle Bank National Association, as
                    Trustee99.1
                Interest
                    Rate Swap Agreement and Interest Rate Cap Agreement, including
                    the ISDA
                    Master Agreement, Schedule and Confirmations (filed as part of
                    the
                    Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 20,
                    2006)


---