alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUBCHAPTER C - CONTRACTING METHODS

AND CONTRACT TYPES

PART 1413 - SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES

PART 1414 - SEALED BIDDING

PART 1415 - CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION

PART 1416 - TYPES OF CONTRACTS

PART 1417 - SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS

PART 1418 [RESERVED]

PART 1413 - SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES

Subpart 1413.2 - Micro-Purchase

1413.201 General.

1413.202-70 Policy.

Subpart 1413.3 - Simplified Acquisition Methods

1413.305 Imprest fund.

1413.305-2 Agency responsibilities.

1413.305-4 Procedures.

1413.306 Standard Form 44, Purchase order-invoice-voucher.

PART 1414 - SEALED BIDDING

Subpart 1414.2 - Solicitation of Bids

1414.201 Preparation of invitation for bids.

1414.201-70 Alternate bids.

Subpart 1414.4 - Opening of Bids and Award of Contract

1414.404 Rejection of bids.

1414.404-1 Cancellation of invitations after opening.

1414.407 Mistakes in bids.

1414.407-3 Other mistakes disclosed before award.

1414.407-4 Mistakes after award.

PART 1415 - CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION

Subpart 1415.2 - Solicitation and Receipt of Proposals and Information

1415.201 Exchanges with industry before receipt of proposals.

1415.207 Handling proposals and information.

1415.207-70 Department of the Interior proposal and information handling

procedures.

1415.207-71 Confidentiality of proposal evaluation.

1415.209 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.

1414.209-70 Examination of records by the Department of the Interior.

Subpart 1415.3 - Source Selection

1415.303 Responsibilities.

1415.305 Proposal evaluation.

Subpart 1415.4 - Contract Pricing

1415.404 Proposal analysis.

1415.404-2 Information to support proposal analysis.

1415.404-4 Profit.

1415.406 Documentation.

1415.406-70 Department of the Interior price negotiation memorandum (PNM).

Subpart 1415.6 - Unsolicited Proposals
1415.606 Agency procedures.

PART 1416 - TYPES OF CONTRACTS

Subpart 1416.2 - Fixed-Price Contracts

1416.203 Fixed-price contracts with economic price adjustment.

1416.203-4 Contract clauses.

Subpart 1416.4 - Incentive Contracts

1416.405 Contract clauses.

PART 1417 - SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS

Subpart 1417.2 - Options

1417.203 Solicitations.

1417.206 Evaluation.

Subpart 1417.4 - Leader Company Contracting

1417.402 Limitations.

Subpart 1417.6 - Management and Operating Contracts

1417.602 Policy.

1417.605 Award, renewal and extension.

PART 1418 [RESERVED]
Docket Number FAA-2014-0625
1 ... T hi s procee di ng ar i s es out of Caus e N o. 04- 09
- 00 13 2- C V
- K
- A , i n t he 21 8t h Judi ci al D i s t r i ct C our t , K ar nes C ount y , T exa s , t he H onorabl e St el l a Sax on pre s i di ng . H owever , r el at or l i s t s t he H onorabl e Ro n Car r , V i s i t i ng Ju dge, a s the re sp o n d e n t. i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No
. 04 -1 0- 00 37 0- CV IN RE Carl os G UT IERRE Z AR CE Orig inal Mandamus Proce eding 1 PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Kar en Ang elini, J ustice Rebec ca Simmons, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: J une 16, 2010 PETI TI ON F OR WR I T OF MANDAMUS DEN I ED On M ay 1 2 , 2 0 1 0 , r e l a t o r

C ar l o s G u t i e r

r e z A r c e f

i l e d a p e t i t i o nf

o r w r i to f m an d a m u s,
c omp la ini ngof

the tr ia l c ourt ’s fa ilure to r ule on his pr o s e reque st for produc tion of a trial tra nscript and stateme nt of fac ts. Th e re cord indicates re lator’s re quest was f iled with the trial court on January 27, 2010. Relator acknowledg es t hat he rec eived corre spondence from the cler k that he will be provide d a copy
o f t h e r e qu e s t e d

d o c u m e n t s u

p o nr e l a t o r ’ s f

u l l p a ym e n to f

t h e c o s t s o f

t h e c o p i e s . A c c o r d i n g l y, relator’s petition for wr it of mandamus is DENI ED. T EX . R. A PP . P. 52.8(a)
. PER CU RI AM
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 2, 2010 of
Insteel Industries, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
    /s/ Michael C. Gazmarian

     Michael C. GazmarianVice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer
#### § 993.80 Expenses.

The committee is authorized to incur such expenses as the Secretary finds are reasonable and likely to be incurred by it during each crop year for the maintenance and functioning of the committee and for such other purposes as the Secretary may, pursuant to the provisions of this subpart, determine to be appropriate.
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 20 Filed 11/13/2006 Page 1 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 20 Filed 11/13/2006 Page 2 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 20 Filed 11/13/2006 Page 3 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 20 Filed 11/13/2006 Page 4 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 20 Filed 11/13/2006 Page 5 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 20 Filed 11/13/2006 Page 6 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 20 Filed 11/13/2006 Page 7 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 20 Filed 11/13/2006 Page 8 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 20 Filed 11/13/2006 Page 9 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 20 Filed 11/13/2006 Page 10 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 20-2 Filed 11/13/2006 Page 1 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 20-2 Filed 11/13/2006 Page 2 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 20-2 Filed 11/13/2006 Page 3 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 20-2 Filed 11/13/2006 Page 4 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 20-2 Filed 11/13/2006 Page 5 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 20-2 Filed 11/13/2006 Page 6 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 20-2 Filed 11/13/2006 Page 7 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 20-3 Filed 11/13/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 20-4 Filed 11/13/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 20-5 Filed 11/13/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 20-5 Filed 11/13/2006 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00727-WKW-CSC Document 3 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 30 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 30 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 30 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 3 of 3
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

BRIAN BONNER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 3:06cv715-MHT

) 

NORINCO a/k/a CHINA NORTH )

INDUSTRIES CORP., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion for summary judgment

(Doc. No. 76) is set for submission, without oral

argument, on March 6, 2008, with any opposing brief and

evidentiary materials due by said date. 

DONE, this the 20th day of February, 2008.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 78 Filed 02/20/2008 Page 1 of 1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with this Quarterly Report of Goldtech Mining Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Tracy Kroeker, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certifies to the best of her knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that: 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.   By:
/s/   Tracy KroekerTRACY KROEKERChief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer Dated: August 15, 2005
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 2:06cr202-WKW

 )

EUGENE L. CLECKLER, and )

KIM CLECKLER )

GOVERNMENT’S RESPONSE TO EUGENE CLECKLER’S

REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE

Comes now the United States of America, by and through Leura G. Canary, United States

Attorney for the Middle District of Alabama, and responds to defendant Eugene Cleckler’s

Request for Disclosure as follows:

The defendant has filed a document styled “Request for Disclosure,” listing certain items

that he wishes the Government to produce. To the extent defendant is seeking relief from the

Court, the request should be denied. The Standing Order on Criminal Discovery, Crim. Misc.

No. 534 (M.D. Ala. Feb. 4, 1999) (the “Order”), provides that “[d]iscovery requests made

pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 16 and this Order require no action on the part of this court and shall

not be filed with the court . . . .” In any event, the Government intends to provide discovery in

this case consistent with the Order, and defendant sets forth no reason why the Order would need

to be altered in this case. In particular, defendant requests disclosure of statements of

Government witnesses, which the Government is not obliged to produce until after the witness

testifies (although the Government may voluntarily produce such statements earlier to avoid trial

delays). See 18 U.S.C. § 3500(a); Fed. R. Crim. P. 26.2(a). Therefore, the Court should deny

defendant any relief based upon his request.

Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 25 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 1 of 3
-2-

Respectfully submitted this the 22nd day of August, 2006.

LEURA G. CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/Andrew O. Schiff

ANDREW O. SCHIFF

Assistant United States Attorney

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334)223-7280

Fax: (334)223-7135

E-mail: andrew.schiff@usdoj.gov

Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 25 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 2 of 3
-3-

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CR. NO. 2:06cr202-WKW

)

EUGENE L. CLECKLER, and )

KIM CLECKLER )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 22, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with the

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the

following: George Beck, Esq. and Ronald Brunson, Esq.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/Andrew O. Schiff

ANDREW O. SCHIFF

Assistant United States Attorney

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334)223-7280

Fax: (334)223-7135

E-mail: andrew.schiff@usdoj.gov

 

Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 25 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 3 of 3
###### Editorial Note on Part 1045

#### Editorial Notes:Nomenclature changes to part 1045 appear at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023, and 88 FR 82238, Nov. 24, 2023.

§ 1045.195 Is any matter exempt from MDR requests?

Editorial Notes:

Nomenclature changes to part 1045 appear at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023, and 88 FR 82238, Nov. 24, 2023.

(a) MDR requests are not accepted for:

(1) Matter containing RD technical engineering, blueprints, and design regarding nuclear weapons, if they contain no NSI.

(2) Matter required to be submitted for prepublication review or other administrative process pursuant to an approved nondisclosure agreement;

(3) Matter that is the subject of pending litigation; or

(4) Any matter contained within an operational file exempted from search and review, publication, and disclosure under the FOIA in accordance with law.

(b) Current Presidential records as described in section 3.5(b) of E.O. 13526 or successor orders that are in the custody of DOE are exempt from release in response to an MDR request.
#### § 983.253 Assessment rate.

On and after September 1, 2021, an assessment rate of $0.0007 per pound is established for California, Arizona, and New Mexico pistachios.

[87 FR 22108, Apr. 14, 2022]
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6006

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. RAYMONT ANTHONY HIGGS , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia

. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. ( 3:04

- cr - 00867

- CMC

- 1 ; 3:16

- cv - 02424

- CMC )

Submitted : May 17, 2018 Decided: May 18, 2018

Before KING and AGEE , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Raymont Anthony Higgs , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Raymon t Anthony Higgs seeks to appeal the district court’s order construing his postjudgment motion as a successive and unauthorized 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion and dismissing it on that basis . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrati ng that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court de nies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independe ntly reviewed the record and conclude that Higgs has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argume nt would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of First Community Financial
Corporation, (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Jody D. Graybill, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                              
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Jody D. Graybill         
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Jody D. Graybill,            
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | President                    
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)



32
#### In the Matter of Ella Hunte, Respondent, v. Jan H. Van Den Hende, as Mayor of the Incorporated Village of Pomona, et al., Appellants.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, made August 16, 1968 in Orange County and entered August 19, 1968 in Rockland County, dismissed as academic, without costs. The judgment was vacated by the order of said court dated November 12, 1968, which granted reargument. Appeal, as limited by appellants’ brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, made November 12, 1968 in Orange County and entered November 14, 1968 in Rockland County, as, on reargument, adhered to the determination in the judgment entered August 19, 1968. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. No opinion. Christ, -Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
               RULE 13a-14(b)


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gallery of History, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Todd Axelrod, Chief Executive Office of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Todd Axelrod
----------------
Todd Axelrod
Chief Executive Officer

February 13, 2009
Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 9 Filed 12/26/2006 Page 1 of 5
Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 9 Filed 12/26/2006 Page 2 of 5
Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 9 Filed 12/26/2006 Page 3 of 5
Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 9 Filed 12/26/2006 Page 4 of 5
Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 9 Filed 12/26/2006 Page 5 of 5
Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 9-2 Filed 12/26/2006 Page 1 of 29
Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 9-2 Filed 12/26/2006 Page 2 of 29
Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 9-2 Filed 12/26/2006 Page 3 of 29
Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 9-2 Filed 12/26/2006 Page 4 of 29
Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 9-2 Filed 12/26/2006 Page 5 of 29
Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 9-2 Filed 12/26/2006 Page 6 of 29
Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 9-2 Filed 12/26/2006 Page 7 of 29
Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 9-2 Filed 12/26/2006 Page 8 of 29
Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 9-2 Filed 12/26/2006 Page 9 of 29
Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 9-2 Filed 12/26/2006 Page 10 of 29
Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 9-2 Filed 12/26/2006 Page 11 of 29
Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 9-2 Filed 12/26/2006 Page 12 of 29
Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 9-2 Filed 12/26/2006 Page 13 of 29
Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 9-2 Filed 12/26/2006 Page 14 of 29
Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 9-2 Filed 12/26/2006 Page 15 of 29
Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 9-2 Filed 12/26/2006 Page 16 of 29
Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 9-2 Filed 12/26/2006 Page 17 of 29
Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 9-2 Filed 12/26/2006 Page 18 of 29
Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 9-2 Filed 12/26/2006 Page 19 of 29
Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 9-2 Filed 12/26/2006 Page 20 of 29
Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 9-2 Filed 12/26/2006 Page 21 of 29
Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 9-2 Filed 12/26/2006 Page 22 of 29
Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 9-2 Filed 12/26/2006 Page 23 of 29
Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 9-2 Filed 12/26/2006 Page 24 of 29
Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 9-2 Filed 12/26/2006 Page 25 of 29
Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 9-2 Filed 12/26/2006 Page 26 of 29
Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 9-2 Filed 12/26/2006 Page 27 of 29
Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 9-2 Filed 12/26/2006 Page 28 of 29
Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 9-2 Filed 12/26/2006 Page 29 of 29
Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 9-3 Filed 12/26/2006 Page 1 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 9-3 Filed 12/26/2006 Page 2 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 9-3 Filed 12/26/2006 Page 3 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 9-3 Filed 12/26/2006 Page 4 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 9-3 Filed 12/26/2006 Page 5 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 9-3 Filed 12/26/2006 Page 6 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 9-4 Filed 12/26/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 9-4 Filed 12/26/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 9-4 Filed 12/26/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 9-4 Filed 12/26/2006 Page 4 of 4
Sign In

Skip to Main Content

National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR)

Improving the Nation's Oral Health

National Institutes of Health

                                                          - Español
                                                          - Staff   Directory
                                                          - A–Z Index
#### § 981.48 Increase of salable percentage.

Upon request filed prior to May 15 by the Board or, if the Board should fail to request, by two or more handlers who have handled at least 15 percent of all almonds handled in the preceding crop year, and after findings of fact (based upon a revision of the estimates required under § 981.49 and other pertinent information) that the quantity of salable almonds is not sufficient to satisfy trade demand and desirable carryover requirements for the crop year, the Secretary may increase the salable percentage. Such findings shall be made in the manner specified in § 981.47.