alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Notification of the Interim Final FIP – Signed by Lisa Jackson Notification of the Interim Final FIP – Signed by Lisa Jackson , , EPA Administrator 40 CFR Part CFR Part CFR Part

49 – Federal Implementation Plan for Oil and Natural Gas Production Facilities Production Facilities ,

, Fort Berthold Indian Reservation Fort Berthold Indian Reservation Fort Berthold Indian Reservation ( Mandan , Hidatsa and

Hidatsa and Hidatsa and Arikara Nations Arikara Nations ,

, or MHA Nation or MHA Nation or MHA Nation )

, North Dakota North Dakota North Dakota . (

as defined in § as defined in § as defined in § 49.152 Carl Daly Carl Daly to: Jennifer.Head 08/02/2012 11:16 AM Cc: Jodell.mizoue, Lisa.decker, Deirdre Rothery, Kate Fay, Sara Laumann This message is digitally signed. Ms. Head, This email is to inform you that Lisa Jackson, Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, has signed an interim final rule “Federal Implementation Plan for Oil and Natural Gas Federal Implementation Plan for Oil and Natural Gas Federal Implementation Plan for Oil and Natural Gas Production Facilities Production Facilities ,

, Fort Berthold Indian Reservation Fort Berthold Indian Reservation Fort Berthold Indian Reservation ( Mandan , Hidatsa and Arikara Nations

Hidatsa and Arikara Nations Hidatsa and Arikara Nations , or MHA Nation Nation) ) , North Dakota North Dakota North Dakota ,

” (Fort Berthold Oil and Gas FIP) a federal rule that applies to oil and gas operations producing from the Bakken Pool on the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation in North Dakota . The FIP requires owners and operators of oil and natural gas production facilities to reduce emissions of volatile organic compounds emanating from well completions , recompletions, and production and storage operations. The agency proposed a Reservation-specific FIP concurrently with this interim final rule . Please find, attached, a copy of the notification sent by certified mail to the primary contact for WPX Energy:

WPX_Actual Notice of FIP Letter 8-1-12.pdf And a copy of the interim final rule:

Fort Berthold FIP NFR_8-1-12 (interim final rule) f or ACTUAL NOTICE LETTERS.pdf If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me or Deirdre Rothery, Chief Air Permitting, Monitoring and Modeling Unit at rothery.deirdre@epa.gov or 303-312-6431. Thank you, Carl Daly, Director, Air Program 303-312-6416
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           36870
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            1687
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  2400
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     270328
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         783797
<ALLOWANCE>                                       6317
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1144996
<DEPOSITS>                                      861514
<SHORT-TERM>                                     66460
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              13188
<LONG-TERM>                                      86564
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          9233
<OTHER-SE>                                      108037
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 1144996
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  33843
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 8101
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   140
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 42084
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               15582
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                3327
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            23175
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      504
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 619
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  14577
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  12828
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       12828
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      8950
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .94
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 958.15 District.

*District* means each of the geographical divisions of the production area initially established or as reestablished pursuant to § 958.27.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-10836 Conference Calendar

CLINTON CUMMINGS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JOE DONALDSON, Dr., Employee, Texas Department Criminal Justice Jordan Unit, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - - - Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:94-CV-11

- - - - - - - - - - - - April 8, 1998 Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Clinton Cummings, Texas prisoner # 637608, appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for the entry of judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. He alleged that the district court did not enter a final judgment in a separate document as required by Fed. Rs. Civ. P. 58 and 79(a). He moves this court for an extension of time to file his brief, for a transcript of his trial at government expense, and forNo. 97-10836 - 2 - appointment of appellate counsel. The record shows that the district court entered a final judgment in a separate document from its order stating its findings of fact. Cummings’ appeal is frivolous and entirely without merit and is DISMISSED in accordance with 5th Cir. R. 42.2. His motions are DENIED. DISMISSED.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS76928 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
(logo)Prudential

 

 

**PrudentialAsset Resources**

PGIMReal Estate Finance

2100Ross Avenue, Suite 2500, Dallas TX 75201

Tel214-777-4500

 

Abusiness of Prudential Financial, Inc.

 

WellsFargo Bank, National Association

CommercialMortgage Servicing

MACD1086

550South Tryon Street, 14th Floor

Charlotte,North Carolina 28202

Attention:Asset Manager

 

RE:         **WFRBS 2012-C10**

Period: **January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019(the “Reporting Period”)**

 

**AnnualCompliance Statement**

 

 

I,Joni Brown-Haas, in my capacity as President and Managing Director ofPrudential Asset Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certify with regard tothe Company’s role as Sub-Servicer under the Sub-Servicing Agreement, (the“Agreement”) dated as of December 1, 2012, pertaining to the above-referencedcertificates, that:

 

(i)      areview of the activities of the Company under the Agreement during the periodnoted above, and of the performance of the Company under the Agreement duringthe relevant period has been made under my supervision, and

 

(ii)    to thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilled all itsobligations under the Agreement throughout the relevant period, and

 

(iii)   to the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilled its obligationsunder its sub-servicing agreement in all material respects, and

 

(iv)    the Company hasmaintained an effective internal control system over the servicing of mortgageloans including the Loans serviced by the Company, and

 

(v)    theCompany has not received any notice regarding qualification, or challenging thestatus of the Lower Tier REMIC or the Upper Tier REMIC as a REMIC, from the IRSor any other governmental agency or body.

 

 

Effectiveas of February 21, 2020

 

/s/Joni Brown-Haas

JoniBrown-Haas

Presidentand Managing Director

PrudentialAsset Resources, Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          43,167
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,560
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 5,100
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    190,882
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          28,496
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            26,968
<LOANS>                                        643,443
<ALLOWANCE>                                      6,829
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 957,892
<DEPOSITS>                                     681,470
<SHORT-TERM>                                    57,097
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              5,470
<LONG-TERM>                                     93,990
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,799
<OTHER-SE>                                      99,876
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 957,892
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 40,490
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                9,835
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   803
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                51,128
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              15,896
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,449
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           30,783
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      900
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 114
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 17,237
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,857
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      18,857
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,682
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.04
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.96
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,550
<LOANS-PAST>                                     2,381
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  5,657
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 6,883
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,254
<RECOVERIES>                                       263
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                6,829
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,874
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          2,955


</TABLE>
IV 

House Calendar No. 242 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1053 

[Report No. 109–700] 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 

consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2006 

Mr. COLE of Oklahoma, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 

resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with 

respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported 

from the Committee on Rules. 

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule 

2 XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the 

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to 

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported on the legislative day of September 29, 2006. 

mmaher on PROD1PC77 with BILLS

House Calendar No. 242 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1053 

[Report No. 109

–700] 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII 

tions reported from the Committee on Rules. with respect to consideration of certain resoluSEPTEMBER 28, 2006 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 

mmaher on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6979

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

KEVIN LAMONT WALKER,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith, 

District Judge. (4:05-cr-00005-RBS-JEB-1)

Submitted: November 15, 2011 Decided: November 18, 2011

Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin Lamont Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Howard Jacob Zlotnick, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Lamont Walker appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion to expedite decision on his 28 U.S.C.A. 

§ 2255 (West Supp. 2011) motion, which the court previously 

struck from its docket due to deficiency in form. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we deny Walker’s motion to assign counsel and affirm the 

district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
-1-

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

ELIZABETH LYNNE HUTCHINSON, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO:

vs. ) CV-06-00700-WHA

) JURY DEMAND

)

PHENIX CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION, ) UNOPPOSED

LARRY E. DICHIARA, officially as )

as Superintendent of the Phenix City Schools, )

)

)

Defendants. )

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO AMEND UNIFORM SCHEDULING ORDER

COMES NOW, Plaintiff in this action and move this Court to amend Section 7 of the

Uniform

Scheduling Order regarding the discovery deadline. (Doc. # 11). Plaintiff requeststhat the deadline

be extended 30 days from the current deadline of April 1, 2007 until May 1, 2007. As grounds

Plaintiff states as follows:

1. Pursuant to the UniformSchedulingOrder, discoveryshould be completed on or before April

1, 2007. However, because Benjamin DeGweck, one of Plaintiff’s attorneys, is no longer

associated with the Wiggins, Childs, Quinn & Pantazis, LLC law firm, attorney Joshua D.

Wilson has filed a notice of appearance in this case to represent Plaintiff. (Doc. # 22).

Because attorneyWilson hasscheduling conflictsthroughout the month of March the parties

are unable to schedule depositions (that have already been Noticed) untilsometime in April.

Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 23 Filed 03/07/2007 Page 1 of 3
-2-

2. Counsel for Plaintiff has spoken with Sydney S. Smith, the attorney for Defendants.

Attorney Smith is agreeable to this Motion and is willing to work together regarding the

scheduling of the depositions. In fact, the parties have already tentatively set a date for these

depositions on April 16-17, 2007.

3. Neither partyanticipatesthat extending this discoverydeadline will cause the pretrial hearing

of July 23, 2007 or the trial date of August 20, 2007 to be extended. However, the

dispositive motion deadline of April 24, 2007 would also need to be extended until May 24,

2007. (See Doc. # 11, Section 2).

4. No party will be prejudiced by this Motion.

WHEREFORE, premises considered, PlaintiffmovesthisCourt, Unopposed byDefendants,

to amend Section 7 of the Uniform Scheduling Order to extend the Discovery Deadline from April

1, 2007 until May 1, 2007 and the Dispositive Motion Deadline from April 24, 2007 until May 24,

2007.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,

/s/ Joshua D. Wilson

Joshua D. Wilson

Rocco Calamusa, Jr.

Counsel for the Plaintiff

OF COUNSEL:

WIGGINS, CHILDS, QUINN & PANTAZIS, LLC

The Kress Building

301 19

th Street North

Birmingham, Alabama 35203

205/314-0500

Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 23 Filed 03/07/2007 Page 2 of 3
-3-

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on March 7

th

, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of

the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to the following:

Sidney S. Smith

Smith & Smith, PC

1503 Broad Street

Phenix City, AL 36867

/s/ Joshua D. Wilson

Of Counsel

Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 23 Filed 03/07/2007 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 99(a)



Citizens Financial Corp.



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley

Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



I, Robert J. Schoonover, President and Chief Executive Officer of Citizens Financial Corp. (the company) certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



|1. |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|     
|-----
|Date:
|     



26
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) CR NO. 3:06CR-191-MHT

)

SPRING DAWSON )

)

ORDER

Based upon this court’s order setting the trial in the above-styled case for June 4,

2007, and for good cause, it is

ORDERED that a final pretrial conference be and is hereby set for April 2, 2007

at 1:00 p.m. in courtroom 4B, United States Courthouse Complex, One Church Street,

Montgomery, Alabama. 

That all applicable deadlines contained in the prior arraignment order and pretrial

order are adjusted accordingly, provided, however that the deadline for the filing of

pretrial, dispositive motions is not extended.

Done this 17 day of January, 2007. th

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cr-00191-MHT-CSC Document 19 Filed 01/17/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### Bailey *v.*Freeman.

May 16, 1913.

Equitable petition. Before Judge Hawkins. Laurens superior court. January 19, 1912.

*R. Earl Gamp,*for plaintiff.

*J. 8. Adams, M. R. Blachshear,*and *R. D. Flynt,*for defendant.

Lumpkin, J.

This ease is substantially controlled by the decisions in *Bennett*v. *Bird,*139 *Ga.*25 (76 S. E. 568), and *Spence v. Queen,*139 *Ga.*587 (77 S. B. 820). The demands sought to be asserted were barred by the statute of limitations; and where not expressly so: appearing, the pleadings must be construed most strongly against the pleader. While the word “fraud” was freely used, no such facts were alleged as showed fraud preventing the discovery of the plaintiff’s rights by the use of the slightest diligence on her part, or the bringing of suit by her within the statutory period. There was accordingly no error in dismissing the petition on demurrer setting up the bar of the statute.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
#### § 984.66 [Reserved]
SUBCHAPTER E—GENERAL CONTRACTING

REQUIREMENTS

PART 1629—TAXES

PART 1631—CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES

PART 1632—CONTRACT FINANCING

PART 1633 [RESERVED]

PART 1629—TAXES

Subpart 1629.4—Contract Clauses

1629.402 Foreign contracts.

PART 1631—CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES

Subpart 1631.1—Definitions

1631.1 Definitions.

Subpart 1631.2—Contracts With Commercial Organizations

1631.200 Scope of subpart.

1631.201-70 Credits.

1631.203 Indirect costs.

1631.203-70 Allocation techniques.

1631.203-71 Business unit General and Administrative (G&A) expenses.

1631.203-72 Home office expense.

1631.205 Selected costs.

1631.205-10 Cost of money.

1631.205-41 Taxes.

1631.205-70 FEHBP public relations and advertising costs.

1631.205-71 FEHBP bad debts.

1631.205-72 FEHBP compensation for personal services.

1631.205-73 FEHBP interest expense.

1631.205-74 FEHBP losses on other contracts.

1631.205-75 Selling costs.

1631.205-76 Trade, business, technical, and professional activity costs.

1631.205-77 FEHBP start-up and other nonrecurring costs.

1631.205-78 FEHBP printed material costs.

1631.205-79 Mandatory statutory reserves.

1631.205-80 Major subcontractor service charges.

1631.205-81 Inferred reasonableness.

1631.205-82 Audits.

PART 1632—CONTRACT FINANCING

Subpart 1632.1—General

1632.170 Recurring premium payments to carriers.

1632.171 Clause—community-rated contracts.

1632.172 Clause—experience-rated contracts.

Subpart 1632.6—Contract Debts

1632.607 Tax credit.

1632.617 Contract clause.

Subpart 1632.7—Contract Funding

1632.770 Contingency reserve payments.

1632.771 Non-commingling of FEHBP funds.
1632.772 Contract clause.

Subpart 1632.8—Assignment of Claims

1632.806-70 Contract clause.

PART 1633 [RESERVED]
#### § 97.131 Conditional assignments.

Assignments recorded in the Office are regarded as absolute assignments for Office purposes until canceled in writing by both parties to the assignment or by a decree of a court of competent jurisdiction. The Office shall not determine whether conditions precedent to the assignment, such as the payment of money, have been fulfilled.