alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
****Bulletin No. 99-07, Supplement 3****
****OMB Home****

November 5, 1999

BULLETIN NO. 99-07, Supplement No. 3

TO THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND ESTABLISHMENTS

SUBJECT:  Apportionment Under the Extension of the Continuing Resolution for FiscalYear 2000

1.**Purpose and background.**  H. J. Res. 75 extends the continuing resolutionthrough November 10, 1999.   

2.**Apportionment.**  I am extending the automatic apportionment specified in section2 of OMB Bulletin No. 99-07 to November 10, 1999.  The portion of the year covered is now11.2 percent.

If you can justify amounts greater than the amount automatically apportioned, please submita written request for apportionment.

**Jacob J. Lew***Director*

Privacy Statement
The BudgetLegislative InformationManagement Reform/GPRAGrants ManagementFinancial ManagementProcurement PolicyInformation & Regulatory Policy

Help

T H E   W H I T E   H O U S E
§ 945.56 Safeguards. ( a ) The committee, with the approval of the Secretary, may prescribe adequate safeguards to prevent shipments pursuant to § 945.53 from entering channels of trade and other outlets for other than the specific purpose authorized therefor.
( b ) Safeguards, provided by this section, may include, but shall not be limited to, requirements that handlers: ( 1 ) Shall obtain the inspection required by § 945.65 or pay the assessment provided by § 945.42, or both, in connection with the potato shipments effected in accordance with § 945.53; and
( 2 ) Shall obtain Certificates of Privilege from the committee for shipments of potatoes effected or to be effected under provisions of § 945.53.
( c ) The committee, with the approval of the Secretary, shall prescribe rules governing the issuance and the contents of Certificates of Privilege.
( d ) The committee may rescind, or deny to any handler, Certificates of Privilege if proof satisfactory to the committee is obtained that potatoes shipped by him for the purposes stated in § 945.53 were handled contrary to the provisions of this section.
( e ) The committee shall make reports to the Secretary, as requested, showing the number of applications for such certificates, the quantity of potatoes covered by such applications for such certificates, the number of such applications denied and certificates granted, the quantity of potatoes shipped under duly issued certificates, and such other information as may be requested by the Secretary.
Part 220 - RESERVED

Parent topic: Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals3031631-MAY-201309:37 AM
2 J UNE 2015

Twelfth Court of Appeals

1517 West Front Street

Suite 354

Tyler, TX 75702

Re: Cantrell Sash v. State

12

- 14

- 00058

- CR

Ms. Lusk :

Attached, please find a copy of the letter sent to my client regarding the opinion issued by the

Court and the right to file a PDR

.

If there is anything else I need to do, please let me know.

Sincerely,

/s/ Austin Reeve Jackson ACCEPTED

12-14-00058-CR

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

6/2/2015 11:10:27 AM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK21 M AY 2015

Cantrell Sash

Inmate: 01916323

Estelle Unit

264 FM 3478

Huntsville, TX 77320

- 3320

Re: Opinion

Mr. Sash:

Please find enclosed a copy of opinion issued by the Twelfth Court of Appeals in your case.

Should you desire to do so, you do have the right to file a pro se Petition for Discretionary

Review in the Court of Criminal Appeals. If you decide to pursue that option you must file your

petition prior to the expirati on of thirty days from the date of the court’s opinion; that is, by June

12, 2015.

I would be happy to address any questions or concerns you have if you will simply let me know.

Sincerely,

Austin Reeve Jackson
# Subpart 5250.1 - EXTRAORDINARY CONTRACTUAL ACTIONS

**Parent topic:**Part 5250 - EXTRAORDINARY CONTRACTUAL ACTIONS AND THE SAFETY ACT

## 5250.101 General.

### 5250.101-3 Records.

 (1)(iii) HCAs are the officials responsible for          preparation and submission of the required records. Forward records to DASN(P) by email at             usn.pentagon.asstsecnavrdadc.mbx.pabt@us.navy.mil with          the subject “[Activity Name] FAR 50.101-3, Request for Relief.” 

## 5250.102 Delegation of and limitations on exercise of authority.

### 5250.102-1-70 Contract adjustment      boards.

(a) *Military Departments*. Subject to the restrictions on delegations of authority in          DFARS Part 250 and FAR 50.102-1 and 50.102-3, HCAs may exercise without power of          redelegation, the authority contained in the Act and Executive Order for amounts not          exceeding the threshold at FAR 50.102-1(b). 

 (i) HCAs may deny any request, regardless of dollar value. 

 (ii) ASN(RDA) is the approval authority for requests to obligate the          Government in excess of the threshold at FAR 50.102-1(b). Submit requests for adjudication          by the Navy Contract Adjustment Board by email at usn.pentagon.asstsecnavrdadc.mbx.pabt@us.navy.mil with the subject          “[Activity Name] DFARS 250.102-1-70 - Extraordinary Contractual Relief pursuant to [insert          “Public Law 85-804” or “Executive Order 10789”].

### 5250.102-2 Contract adjustment boards.

Members and alternate members will be appointed by DASN(P). 

## 5250.103 Contract adjustments.

### 5250.103-5 Processing cases.

   (b) The contracting activity responsible for processing a contractor's request for contractual adjustment under a DON contract is responsible for establishing liaison and joint action with other Military Departments and other departments and agencies of the Government, until the case is submitted to the Navy Contract Adjustment Board for disposition. 

### 5250.103-6 Disposition.

   When a contractor's request is denied below the Secretarial level, the contracting officer of the activity that forwarded the case to the board shall furnish a letter to the contractor explaining the denial.

## 5250.104 Residual powers.

### 5250.104-3 Special procedures for unusually hazardous or nuclear risks.

 (b) Submit requests for authorization to use the          clause prescribed at FAR 50.104-4 with sufficient justification to SECNAV via DASN(P) by          email at usn.pentagon.asstsecnavrdadc.mbx.pabt@us.navy.mil with          the subject “[Activity Name] FAR 50.104-3 – Indemnification Request.”
§ 93.14 Fees for aflatoxin analysis and fees for testing of other mycotoxins. ( a ) The fee charged for any laboratory analysis for aflatoxins and other mycotoxins shall be obtained from the Laboratory Director for aflatoxin laboratories at the Dothan administrative office as follows: USDA, AMS, Science & Technology, 3119 Wesley Way, Suite 6, Dothan, Alabama 36305, Voice Phone: 334-794-5070, Facsimile: 334-792-1432.
( b ) The charge for the aflatoxin testing of raw peanuts under the Peanut Marketing Agreement for subsamples 1-AB, 2-AB, 3-AB, and 1-CD is a set cost per pair of analyses and shall be set by cooperative agreement between the Peanut Administrative Committee and AMS Science and Technology program.
[65 FR 64317, Oct. 26, 2000]
---

Exhibit 13.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Ur-Energy Inc. (the "Corporation") on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roger Smith, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.





Date: March 11, 2010





/s/ Roger SmithRoger SmithChief Financial Officer(principal financial officer)
§ 993.21b Trade demand. ( a ) *Domestic trade demand.* The quantity of prunes which the commercial trade will acquire from all handlers during a crop year for distribution in domestic markets for human consumption as prunes and prune products.
( b ) *Foreign trade demand.* The quantity of prunes which the commercial trade will acquire from all handlers during a crop year for distribution in other than domestic markets for human consumption as prunes and prune products.
[30 FR 9798, Aug. 6, 1965]
159 So.2d 284

#### HUMBLE OIL & REFINING COMPANY v. Donald H. JONES et al.

No. 47010.

Jan. 20, 1964.

In re: Humble Oil & Refining Company applying for certiorari or writ of review *570to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Acadia. 157 So.2d 110.

Writ refused, correct. We find that the result is
1448.102 Policies.       The HCA shall establish procedures for processing and evaluating VECP's as prescribed in FAR Subpart 48.1 and 369 DM, Value Engineering.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1448.1 - Policies and Procedures
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 78 FR 34247, June 7, 2013.

#### § 1.44 [Reserved]
Subpart 5629.4 - CONTRACT CLAUSES

Parent topic: Part 5629 - TAXES

5629.401 Domestic Contracts

5629.401-6 Gross Receipts and Compensating Tax

5629.401-6-90 Procedures for authorizing the use of FAR 52.22910, State of New Mexico

Gross Receipts and Compensating Tax

(Revised May 2016)

United States Special Operations Command completed the NM-SOCOM Tax Agreement required by

FAR 29.401-4(b) , effective December 12, 2002. However, until such time as the agency is added to

the list published in FAR, contracting officers must receive approval prior to including the clause in

any cost-reimbursement contract performed in the State of . Contracting officers must follow the

procedures at 5601.304(4)(b)(1) used to authorize one-time use clauses, until United States Special

Operations Command’s name is added to FAR 29.401-4(c)(1) .

HQ, United States Special Operations Command

Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L)

SOFARS 5629

February 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1043 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1043

Directing the Director of National Intelligence to submit to the House 
    of Representatives not later than 14 days after the date of the 
adoption of this resolution, in unclassified form, all documents in the 
possession of the Director concerning the impact of the war in Iraq on 
  terrorism and terrorist threats, including a National Intelligence 
 Estimates entitled ``Trends in Global Terrorism: Implications for the 
United States'' dated on or about April, 2006, and any other actual or 
        pending National Intelligence Estimates concerning Iraq.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 27, 2006

Mr. Conyers (for himself, Mr. Hinchey, Mr. Van Hollen, Ms. Waters, Mr. 
Wexler, Mr. Honda, Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas, Mrs. Maloney, Ms. Corrine 
Brown of Florida, Mr. Pastor, Mr. Weiner, Mrs. Capps, Mr. Rush, Ms. Zoe 
Lofgren of California, Mr. Olver, Mr. Grijalva, Ms. Linda T. Sanchez of 
  California, Mr. Schiff, Mrs. Christensen, Ms. Woolsey, Ms. Lee, Mr. 
 Payne, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. Davis of Illinois, Ms. Watson, Mr. Stark, 
  Mr. Lewis of Georgia, Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, Mr. DeFazio, Mr. 
Markey, Ms. Norton, Mr. Evans, Mr. Serrano, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Delahunt, 
Mr. Farr, Mr. McGovern, Mr. Meehan, Mr. Owens, Mr. Ackerman, Ms. Moore 
of Wisconsin, Ms. Kilpatrick of Michigan, Mr. Thompson of Mississippi, 
Mr. Blumenauer, Mr. McDermott, and Mr. Berman) submitted the following 
resolution; which was referred to the Select Committee on Intelligence 
                           (Permanent Select)

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Directing the Director of National Intelligence to submit to the House 
    of Representatives not later than 14 days after the date of the 
adoption of this resolution, in unclassified form, all documents in the 
possession of the Director concerning the impact of the war in Iraq on 
  terrorism and terrorist threats, including a National Intelligence 
 Estimates entitled ``Trends in Global Terrorism: Implications for the 
United States'' dated on or about April, 2006, and any other actual or 
        pending National Intelligence Estimates concerning Iraq.

    Resolved,  That the Director of National Intelligence is directed 
to submit to the House of Representatives not later than 14 days after 
the date of the adoption of this resolution, in unclassified form, all 
documents in the possession of the Director concerning the impact of 
the war in Iraq on terrorism and terrorist threats, including a 
National Intelligence Estimates entitled ``Trends in Global Terrorism: 
Implications for the United States,'' dated on or about April, 2006, 
and any other actual or pending National Intelligence Estimates 
concerning Iraq.
                                 <all>
```
#### PEOPLE ex rel. GOLDBERGER v. BELL.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

December 24, 1914.)

Proceeding by the People of the State of New York, on the relation of Simon Goldberger against George H. Bell, as Commissioner.

No opinion. Motion granted, with $10 costs. Order filed.
Exhibit 31.2

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Stephen B. Waters,certify that:

1.    I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of National Property Investors8;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financialreporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), for theregistrant and have: 

 

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b)  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reportingand the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordancewith generally accepted accounting principles;

 

(c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
     FROM OUR JUNE 30, 1999 1-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
     BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINNCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                     JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                 3,015
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                     0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                           0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                      43,861
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>           14,859
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                14,797
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                  90,814
<LOANS>                                1,051
<ALLOWANCE>                          161,544
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       135,759
<DEPOSITS>                             2,904
<SHORT-TERM>                             804
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                    7,000
<LONG-TERM>                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                            5,027
<COMMON>                              10,050
<OTHER-SE>                           161,544
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>         1,981
<INTEREST-LOAN>                          782
<INTEREST-INVEST>                         54
<INTEREST-OTHER>                       2,817
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                       1,137
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                     1,244
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     1,573
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                     60
<LOAN-LOSSES>                              8
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                       992
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                          817
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          817
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                               (218)
<NET-INCOME>                             590
<EPS-BASIC>                           0.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0.69
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                          4.46
<LOANS-NON>                              321
<LOANS-PAST>                               6
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                         108
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                        1012
<CHARGE-OFFS>                             21
<RECOVERIES>                               0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                       1051
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                    1051
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                        0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                    0



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO and CFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of National Property Investors 8 (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Steven D. Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 
|   |       /s/Steven D. Cordes |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name: Steven D. Cordes                             |
|   | Date: August 13, 2009                              |
|   |                                               |
|   |      /s/Stephen B. Waters |
|   | Name: Stephen B. Waters                            |
|   | Date: August 13, 2009                              |

 

This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 11 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 11 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 11 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 3 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN )

INSURANCE COMPANY, )

)

PLAINTIFFS-STAKEHOLDERS, )

)

V. ) Civil Action No.: CV-06-717.ID

)

CAROL THORN, et al., )

)

DEFENDANTS-CLAIMANTS. )

ANSWER OF DEFENDANT LV STABLER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL

TO AMENDED COMPLAINT

Comes now the Defendant sued as LV Stabler Memorial Hospital (correctly identified as

Greenville Hospital Corporation d/b/a LV Stabler Memorial Hospital) , and for Answer to Plaintiff’s

Amended Complaint says as follows:

 1. Without sufficient information to admit or deny, therefore denied.

 2. Without sufficient information to admit or deny, therefore denied.

 3. Without sufficient information to admit or deny, therefore denied.

 4. Without sufficient information to admit or deny, therefore denied.

 5. Without sufficient information to admit or deny, therefore denied.

 6. Without sufficient information to admit or deny, therefore denied.

 7. Without sufficient information to admit or deny, therefore denied.

 8. Without sufficient information to admit or deny, therefore denied.

 9. Without sufficient information to admit or deny, therefore denied.

Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 62-2 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 1 of 3
10. Admitted.

11. Admitted.

In addition , Defendant Hospital claims that it is entitled to an amount of the insurance

proceeds equal to the amount of benefits and services provided by it to the patients treated at its

facility.

/s/ Greer B. Mallette 

Richard E. Smith

Greer B. Mallette

Attorneys for defendant Greenville Hospital

Corporation d/b/a L.V. Stabler Memorial Hospital

OF COUNSEL:

CHRISTIAN & SMALL LLP

ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS

505 20TH STREET NORTH - SUITE 1800

BIRMINGHAM AL 35203-2696

(205) 795-6588

(205) 328-7234 Facsimile

Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 62-2 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have this date served a copy of the foregoing pleading upon all counsel

of record in this cause by placing a copy of same in the United States mail, postage prepaid,

addressed as follows on this the 16th day of July , 2007:

Mathew Richardson

Sidney W. Jackson, III

Jackson, Foster & Graham

P.O. Box 2225

R. Larry Bradford

Bradford & Sears, P.C.

2020 Canyon Road, Suite 100

Birmingham, AL 35216

Jimmie R. Ippolito, Jr.

1409 Coliseum Boulevard

Montgomery, AL 36130

/s/ Greer B. Mallette 

OF COUNSEL

Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 62-2 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 3 of 3
SUBCHAPTER G - CONTRACT

MANAGEMENT

PART 1542 - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION

PART 1545 - GOVERNMENT PROPERTY

PART 1546 - QUALITY ASSURANCE

PART 1548 - VALUE ENGINEERING [RESERVED]

PART 1542 - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION

Subpart 1542.7 - Indirect Cost Rates

1542.703-2 Certificate of indirect costs.

1542.705 Final indirect cost rates.

1542.705-70 Solicitation and contract clause.

Subpart 1542.12 - Novation and Change of Name Agreements

1542.1200 Scope of subpart.

1542.1202 Responsibility for executing agreements.

1542.1203 Processing agreements.

PART 1545 - GOVERNMENT PROPERTY

Subpart 1545.1 - General

1545.107 Government property clauses.

Subpart 1545.3 - Providing Government Property to Contractors

1545.309 Providing Government production and research property under special

restrictions.

PART 1546 - QUALITY ASSURANCE

Subpart 1546.7 - Warranties

1546.704 Authority for use of warranties.

PART 1548 - VALUE ENGINEERING [RESERVED]