alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2908.404 Using schedules.

Small business considerations, procedures regarding both prime and subcontracting, and clearances

specified in DOLAR 2919 apply to GSA Federal Supply Schedule Orders above the simplified

acquisition threshold. Procedures to be followed may be modified by the Office of Small Business

Program as appropriate in order to comply with GSA Federal Supply Schedule procedures (e.g., first

tier contracts may be required to report their commercial subcontracting goals to the DOL Office of

Small Business Programs).

Parent topic: Subpart 2908.4 - Federal Supply Schedules
2932.703 Contract funding requirements.

(a) Except in unusual circumstances, the contracting office may not issue solicitations until an

approved procurement request (PR), containing a certification that funds are available, has been

received. However, the contracting office may take all necessary actions up to the point of contract

obligation before receipt of the PR certifying that funds are available when:

(1) The Assistant Secretaries, Inspector General, Bureau Chief, Deputy Under Secretary, Solicitor of

Labor, Commissioner, or Director of the Women's Bureau certifies that such action is necessary to

meet critical program schedules for their program area;

(2) The Budget Officer certifies that program authority has been issued and funds to cover the

acquisition will be available before the date set for receipt of proposals;

(3) The solicitation includes the clause at FAR 52.232-18, Availability of Funds.

(b) The contracting office may not open bids/close solicitations until a PR, either planning or final,

has been received that contains a certification of fund availability. Only the project or program

official with the authority to commit funds from the agency that initiated the PR may make that

written certification.

(c) The project or program office that initiated the PR is responsible for obtaining required

certifications.

Parent topic: Subpart 2932.7 - Contract Funding
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 22 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 1 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 22 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 2 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 22 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 3 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 22 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 4 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 22 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 5 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 22 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 6 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 22 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 7 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 22 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 8 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 22 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 9 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 22 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 10 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 22 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 11 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 22 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 12 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 22 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 13 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 22 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 14 of 14
#### W. E. Blume, Inc., Respondent, v City of New York et al., Appellants.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on September 25,. 1979, granting plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on the first cause of action, and the judgment entered thereon on October 4, 1979, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs and disbursements, and the motion denied. Plaintiff, an electrical contractor, entered into a contract with defendant, New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation (HHC) to perform all of the required electrical work in the renovation of the Queens Hospital Center. This work was finished more than one year after passage of the contemplated completion date. The HHC admittedly withheld payment in full on the grounds that plaintiff failed to perform under the terms of the contract in a timely manner. Plaintiff then commenced this action for the balance of the contract payment and for damages resulting from this delay. Plaintiff alleges that the delays encountered are attributable to the actions of the HHC and not caused by the actions of the plaintiff. HHC, however, maintains that it was damaged due to this delay, which, it is alleged, was caused in full by the plaintiff. Additionally, the withholding of a part. payment is specifically sanctioned by certain contractual provisions. HHC was permitted to retain as liquidated damages, money due under the contract if the plaintiff failed to timely complete the renovations. Since the delay is admitted, the core issue then becomes which party is responsible for the delay. Each party has cast the other in the role of the offender. Thus, a substantial question of fact was presented which cannot be determined in advance of trial. The analysis urged by plaintiff, and that adopted at Special Term, would require full payment without consideration being given to those contrary provisions explicitly expressed in the contract. Therefore, under the facts presented, it was error for Special Term to grant plaintiff partial summary judgment for the unpaid balance due under the contract. Concur—Fein, J. P., Sandler, Ross, Bloom and Carro, JJ.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION IX AIR DIVISION

Technical Support Document 

for

EPA’s Direct Final Rulemaking

for the

California State Implementation Plan

SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT

Rule 1020, Definitions

Prepared by: Arnold Lazarus

Reviewed by: Andy Steckel

April 2014
2

RULE IDENTIFICATION 

Agency: San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District 

(District)

SIP Approved Rule: Rule 1020 - Definitions

Adopted - January 15, 2009

Submitted - March 10, 2009

EPA Approved - August 28, 2009 (74 FR 44291)

Subject of this TSD: Rule 1020 - Definitions

Adopted - February 21, 2013

Submitted - February 10, 2014

BACKGROUND 

Rule 1020: Definitions

San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (District) defines terms used 

throughout other District rules, including a list of compounds exempt from Volatile 

Organic Compound (VOC) controls due to their low ozone forming potential.

PURPOSE OF RULE AMENDMENT – District amended Rule 1020 to add dimethyl 

carbonate (DMC) and propylene carbonate (PC) to the District’s list of exempt 

compounds within the definition of VOC as a response to EPA findings that DMC and PC 

have a low potential to form ozone in the atmosphere. EPA found that these compounds 

are less photo-chemically reactive than ethane and thus have a negligible contribution to 

ozone formation. EPA announced the exemption of DMC and PC in the Federal Register, 

effective February 2009 (74 FR 3437). By exempting these compounds, manufacturers of 

coatings or solvent cleaning materials have additional options with which to formulate 

low-VOC coatings and cleaning materials.1

The District also amended Rule 1020 by removing requirements for two previously 

exempted compounds: methyl formate (MF) and tertiary-butyl acetate (TBAc). Based on 

the District’s analysis, the District determined that the current permit requirements 

included in Rule 1020 for MF and TBAc are not needed and will subsequently be 

removed.2

EPA EVALUATION – EPA staff have reviewed the District’s staff report, rule revisions, 

and the cited FR notices. Since our last review and approval of Rule 1020, the only 

changes reflected in this SIP submittal are revisions to the list of exempt compounds. 

These revisions are consistent with EPA’s analogous list of exempt compounds and 

relevant Clean Air Requirements regarding enforceability and SIP revisions.

EPA ACTION – EPA staff recommends that the amendment of Rule 1020 be approved

into the SIP.
3

___________________________________________________________________

1. District Final Staff Report- February 21,2013

2. Ibid.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3351 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1-(P-Tolyl)-3-Methyl-5-Pyrazolone. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 5, 2006 

Mr. KENNEDY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1-(P-Tolyl)-3-Methyl5-Pyrazolone. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 1-(P-TOLYL)-3-METHYL-5-PYRAZOLONE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.31.21 1-(P-Tolyl)-3-Methyl-5-Pyrazolone (CAS 

No. 86–92–0) (provided for in subheading 2933.19.04) ................................ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 3351 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

HOWARD GLEN TOOLE,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO.: 5:06cv00126/MCR/AK

JAMES MCDONOUGH,

Respondent.

___________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and

recommendation dated June 20, 2006. The parties have been furnished a copy of the

report and recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections. Pursuant to

Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), I have made a de novo determination of

any portions to which an objection has been made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation, Doc. 2, is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This cause is hereby TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for

the Middle District of Alabama.

DONE AND ORDERED this 27th day of July, 2006.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 4 Filed 07/27/2006 Page 1 of 1 Case 5:06-cv-00126-MCR-AK Document 4 Filed 07/28/2006 Page 1 of 1
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3243 

To suspend temporarily the duty on metsulfuron-methyl. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 26, 2006 

Mr. OBAMA introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on metsulfuron-methyl. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON METSULFURON4 METHYL. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


ycherry on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
2 

S 3243 IS 

‘‘ 9902.l.l Methyl 2-[([([4-methoxy-6-methyl-1.3.5- 

tiazin-2-yl] amino) carbonyl] amino) 

sulfonyl] benzoate (CAS No. 74223–64– 

6) (provided for in subheading 

2935.00.75); and Methyl 2-[([([4- 

methoxy-6-methyl-1.3.5-tiazin-2-yl] 

amino) carbonyl] amino) sulfonyl] benzoate (CAS No. 74223–64–6) put up in 

forms or packings for retail sale or as 

preparations or articles (provided for in 

subheading 3808.30.15) .......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
Subpart 631.1—Applicability

Parent topic: PART 631—CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES

631.101 Objectives.

The Procurement Executive is the agency head's designee for the purposes of FAR 31.101.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1096 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1096

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      December 7, 2006.
    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a two-thirds 
vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the same day it is 
presented to the House is waived with respect to any resolution reported on the 
legislative day of December 7, 2006.
    Sec. 2. It shall be in order at any time on the legislative day of December 
7, 2006, for the Speaker to entertain motions that the House suspend the rules. 
The Speaker or his designee shall consult with the Minority Leader or her 
designee on the designation of any matter for consideration pursuant to this 
resolution.
    Sec. 3. House Resolutions 810, 939, 951, and 1047 are laid upon the table.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Alexander Walsh, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Lithium Exploration
      Group, Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Lithium Exploration Group, Inc.                                                           

Dated: October 14, 2011

| | /s/
      Alexander Walsh                                      
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------
| | Alexander Walsh                                                
| | President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief
      Financial      
| | Officer and Director                                           
| | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Financial Officer
| | and Principal Accounting Officer)                              
| | Lithium Exploration Group, Inc.                                

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Lithium
Exploration Group, Inc. and will be retained by Lithium Exploration Group, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
1505.000 Scope of part.       This part provides instructions on publicizing contract opportunities and response time, instructions on information to include in the synopses of proposed contracts, instructions on publicizing orders under GSA schedule contracts, policy references relative to release of information, and procedures for obtaining information on previous Government contracts.    **Parent topic:** PART 1505 - PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONS
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 133200 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, DAVID BARBER, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 133200 COA: 262733 Genesee CC: 04-080417-NZ JOHNNIE COLEMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 4, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

d0416 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 24, 2007

Clerk
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)    | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |

|   |                                                                                                                                                            |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | /s/                Brian GallagherBrian                Gallagher(Acting                Principal Financial Officer) Date:                November 18, 2005 |

----
Exhibit 10.73


 


Supplementary Agreement


 


Party A (the Lender): Sina Accord Investments
Limited


 


Party B (the Borrower): Ambow Education Holding
Ltd.


 


(Collectively as the “Parties”)


 


WHEREAS,


The Parties signed a loan agreement on April
5, 2017 and Party A agreed to provide a one-year interest-free loan of US$6,000,000 to Party
B.


 


NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:


		1.	The Parties agree to extend the term of such loan for an additional year through April 4, 2019.



 


		2.	All other terms of the Agreement shall remain valid and in full force and effect.



 


		3.	This Supplementary Agreement shall come into force on the date of seal or signature by both parties.



 


		4.	This Supplementary Agreement is signed by two copies. Each party holds one copy.



 


	SIGNED BY
	  /s/	 
	(Authorized signature for and on behalf of SINO ACCORD INVESTMENTS LIMITED the “Lender”)
	 
	Date: March 7, 2018
	 
	SIGNED BY
	  /s/	 
	(Authorized signature for and on behalf of SINO AMBOW EDUCATION HOLDING LTD. the “Borrower”)
	 
	Date: March 7, 2018
#### § 959.125 Disqualification.

The committee from time to time may conduct surveys of handling of onions for special purposes requiring Certificates of Privilege to determine whether handlers are complying with the requirements and regulations applicable to such certificates. Whenever the committee finds that the handler or consignee is failing to comply with requirements and regulations applicable to handling of onions in special outlets and requiring such certificates, a Certificate or Certificates of Privilege issued such handler may be rescinded and subsequent certificates denied. Such disqualification shall apply to, and not exceed, a reasonable period of time as determined by the committee, but in no event shall it extend beyond the date of the succeeding fiscal period. Any handler who has a Certificate rescinded or denied may appeal to the committee in writing for reconsideration of his disqualification.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

PROGRESSIVE AM. INS. CO., )

 )

Plaintiff, )

 ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv717-ID

v. )

 )

CAROL THORN, et al., )

 )

Defendants. )

ORDER

The court has reviewed the parties’ joint motion for entry of final order, as well as

the accompanying proposed order in which the parties request the court to disburse the

interpleaded funds, plus accrued interest, to the law firm of Jackson, Foster & Graham,

LLC, on behalf of the Kirkindoll Defendants. (Doc. No. 101.) Prior to the court’s entry

of a final order disbursing the interpleaded funds, the party or parties who will be

responsible for paying taxes on the accrued interest must provide the court with a

completed and signed IRS W-9 Form. 

Accordingly, it is CONSIDERED and ORDERED that the responsible party or

parties, through counsel, submit the required IRS W-9 Form(s) on or before January 16,

2008. The IRS W-9 Form(s) shall be submitted or mailed to the chambers of the

undersigned, not filed with the clerk.

Done this 7 day of January, 2008. th

 /s/ Ira DeMent 

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 103 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 1 of 1
Subpart 947.70 - Foreign Travel

Source: 65 FR 81007, Dec. 22, 2000, unless otherwise noted.

Parent topic: PART 947 - TRANSPORTATION

947.7000 [Reserved]

947.7001 Policy.

Contractor foreign travel shall be conducted pursuant to the requirements contained in DOE Order

551.1C, or its successor, Official Foreign Travel, or any subsequent version of the order in effect at

the time of award.

947.7002 Contract clause.

When foreign travel may be required under the contract, the contracting officer shall insert the

clause at 952.247-70, Foreign Travel.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         433,859
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  992,584
<ALLOWANCES>                                    54,766
<INVENTORY>                                     35,786
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,440,574
<PP&E>                                       5,326,001
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,965,484
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,959,017
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,508,897
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         61
<COMMON>                                       105,321
<OTHER-SE>                                   (114,364)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,959,017
<SALES>                                      6,383,648
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,383,648
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,889,678
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             114,601
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                788,228
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            787,428
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   715,264
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13


</TABLE>
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 6 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 1 of 1