alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.3



                                                    [LOGO] Countrywide(R)
                                                    ----------------------
                                                          HOME LOANS

                                                      400 Countrywide Way
February 28, 2007                             Simi Valley, California 93065-6298

Impac Secured Assets Corporation
19500 Jamboree Road
Irvine, CA 92612

                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE


I, Joseph Candelario, hereby certify that I am an officer of Countrywide GP,
Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP (the "Servicer"). I
further certify, with respect to the applicable servicing agreement relating to
the securitization transaction(s) set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto (the
"Servicing Agreement") that:

      (a) A review of the activities of the Servicer during the preceding
      calendar year and of the performance of the Servicer under the Servicing
      Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

      (b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
      fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all
      material respects throughout such year.


/s/ Joseph Candelario           February 28, 2007
---------------------           -----------------
Joseph Candelario
First Vice President
Compliance Officer
Loan Administration

See Deal Name listing on following page.

<PAGE>

Exhibit A

ISAC 2006-1 (Subserviced)
ISAC 2006-1 (Subserviced)
ISAC 2006-2 (Subserviced)
ISAC 2006-3 (Subserviced)
ISAC 2006-4 (Subserviced)
ISAC 2006-5 (Subserviced)
ISAC 2006-5 (Subserviced)
ISAC 2006-3 (Subserviced)
ISAC 2006-4 (Subserviced)
ISAC 2006-2 (Subserviced)
ISAC 2006-5 (Subserviced)
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Barney Kaplan, Respondent, v. Zodiac Watch Company et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Gibson, P. J.

The board was warranted in finding that “claimant was away from home on employer’s'business and was engaged in a reasonable activity when he fell and injured his back; and that such injury arose out of and in the course of his employment.” There was evidence that claimant’s haste in dressing was due to the demands of his work schedule and became the cause of his injury; and while affirmance could rest upon this evidence, the award can be sustained independently thereof since it was well within the area of factual evaluation committed to the board to assay the incident in its entirety *681as one of the “ normal activities ” of a worker distant from home which may give rise to a compensable accident *(Matter of Schreiber*v. *Revlon Prods. Corp.,*5 A D 2d 207, 208). The recent decisions upon which appellants rely (see, e.g., *Matter of Orpin*v. *Brother & Co.,*15 A D 2d 282, affd. 12 N Y 2d 749; *Matter of Friedwald,*v. *New York State Ins. Dept.,*17 A D 2d 670) present no anomaly in the law but, at most, inconsistencies in the board’s exercise of its fact-finding authority within this special area; as in each of those cases the board denied an award and we affirmed its denial. By the same token we should affirm the award in this case. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Aulisi and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur with Gibson, P. J.; Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and dismiss in a memorandum by Herlihy, J.: On this appeal the respondents do not base the reason for affirmance upon the fact that the claimant was in a hurry but in its brief repeatedly refer to the fact that the claimant was “rushing”. Regardless of the semantics, the uncontroverted reason for the claimant’s act was that he had to travel approximately 550 miles from Chicago to Duluth, Minnesota, leaving Saturday morning and arriving in time for work Monday morning. This particular act is common to all male employees regardless of vocation and within the facts of this ease bears no reasonable connection to the employment. (Cf. *Matter of Miller*v. *Bartlett Tree Expert Co.,*3 A D 2d 777, affd. 3 N Y 2d 654; *Matter of Orpin*v. *Brother Co.,*15 A D 2d 282, affd. 12 N Y 2d 749; *Matter of Friedwald*v. *New York State Ins. Dept.,*17 A D 2d 670.) The claimant received disability insurance to which he was entitled and to now award him compensation benefits is to eliminate the distinction between the two types of protection. In sum, from the record, there is no substantial evidence to bring the injury within “ work connected ” so as to arise in the course of employment. (Cf. *Matter of Davis*v. *Newsweek Mag.,*305 N. Y. 20, 27.) The statute is not intended to provide insurance against every accident happening to a working man.
52.247-37 F.o.b. Vessel, Port of Shipment.       As prescribed in 47.303-9(c), insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts when the delivery term is f.o.b. vessel, port of shipment:          F.o.b. Vessel, Port of Shipment (Apr 1984)                                       (a) 						            The term "f.o.b. vessel, port of shipment," as used in this clause, means free of expense to the Government loaded, stowed, and trimmed on board the ocean vessel at the specified port of shipment.                                          (b) 						            The Contractor shall-                                                         (1)                                                                           (i) 										                    Pack and mark the shipment to comply with contract specifications; or                                                                              (ii) 										                    In the absence of specifications, prepare the shipment for ocean transportation in conformance with carrier requirements to protect the goods and to ensure assessment of the lowest applicable transportation charge;                                                                                                           (2)                                                                           (i) 										                    Deliver the shipment on board the ocean vessel in good order and condition on the date or within the period fixed; and                                                                              (ii) 										                    Pay and bear all charges incurred in placing the shipment actually on board;                                                                                                           (3) 								                Provide a clean ship’s receipt or on-board ocean bill of lading;                                                            (4) 								                Be responsible for any loss of and/or damage to the goods occurring before delivery of the shipment on board the ocean vessel; and                                                            (5) 								                At the Government’s request and expense, assist in obtaining the documents required for-                                                                           (i) 										                    Exportation; or                                                                              (ii) 										                    Importation at destination.                                                                                                                   (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.247 [Reserved]
SUBCHAPTER B - ACQUISITION PLANNING

PART 1505 - PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONS

PART 1506 - COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS

PART 1508 - REQUIRED SOURCES OF SUPPLY

PART 1509 - CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS

PART 1511 - DESCRIBING AGENCY NEEDS

PART 1512 - ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL ITEMS

PART 1505 - PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONS

1505.000 Scope of part.

Subpart 1505.2 - Synopses of Proposed Contract Actions

1505.202 Exceptions.

1505.203 Publicizing and response time.

1505.271 [Reserved]

Subpart 1505.5 - Paid Advertisement [Reserved]

PART 1506 - COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS

1506.000 Scope of part.

Subpart 1506.2 - Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources [Reserved]

Subpart 1506.3 - Other Than Full and Open Competition

1506.302-5 Authorized or required by statute.

1506.303-2 Content.

PART 1508 - REQUIRED SOURCES OF SUPPLY

Subpart 1508.8 - Acquisition of Printing and Related Supplies

1508.870 Contract clause.

PART 1509 - CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS

1509.000 Scope of part.

Subpart 1509.4 - Debarment, Suspension and Ineligibility

1509.403 Definitions.

1509.406 Debarment.

1509.406-3 Procedures.

1509.407 Suspension.

1509.407-3 Procedures.

Subpart 1509.5 - Organizational Conflicts of Interests

1509.500 Scope of subpart.

1509.502 Applicability.

1509.503 Waiver.

1509.505-4 Obtaining access to proprietary information.

1509.505-70 Information sources.

1509.507-1 Solicitation provisions.

1509.507-2 Contract clause.

PART 1511 - DESCRIBING AGENCY NEEDS

1511.000 Scope of part.

1511.011 Solicitation Provisions and Contract Clauses.

1511.011-70 Reports of work.

1511.011-71 [Reserved]

1511.011-72 Monthly progress report.

1511.011-73 Level of effort.

1511.011-74 Work assignments.
1511.011-75 Working files.

1511.011-76 Legal analysis.

1511.011-77 Final reports.

1511.011-78 Advisory and assistance services.

1511.011-79 Information resources management.

PART 1512 - ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL ITEMS

Subpart 1512.1 - Special Requirements for the Acquisition of Commercial Items

1512.101 Unenforceability of unauthorized obligations.

1512.1070 Contract clause.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1446

CURVES INTERNATIONAL, INC., 

 Plaintiff, 

and 

CURVES OF WALKERTON; JOHN DOES 1-10, individuals whose 

identities are as of yet unknown; TEAM WRIGHT LOSS GURU, 

LLC; ABC CORPORATIONS 1-10, 

 Defendants, 

and 

TONI MCELVEEN, 

 Defendant - Appellant, 

v. 

VONDA HARDY; BARRY HARDY; BARVON ENTERPRISES, LLC, 

 Defendants - Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, 

Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:11-cv-00456-WO-JEP) 

Submitted: July 24, 2014 Decided: July 28, 2014

Before FLOYD and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 
2

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Toni McElveen, Appellant Pro Se. Robert A. Hartsoe, HARTSOE & 

ASSOCIATES, PC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
3

PER CURIAM: 

Toni McElveen seeks to appeal from the entry of a 

default judgment against her under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2) 

following her failure to plead or otherwise defend against the 

third-party civil action and cross-claims commenced against her 

by Vonda Hardy, Barry Hardy, and BarVon Enterprises, LLC. 

We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the 

notice of appeal was not timely filed. 

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of 

the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, 

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends 

the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the 

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely 

filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional 

requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). 

The district court’s judgment was entered on the 

docket on March 31, 2014. The notice of appeal was filed on 

May 2, 2014. Because McElveen failed to file a timely notice of 

appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal 

period, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
4

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

DISMISSED
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3299 

To suspend temporarily the duty on automatic drip coffeemakers other than 

those with clocks. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 26, 2006 

Mr. ALLEN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on automatic drip 

coffeemakers other than those with clocks. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUTOMATIC DRIP COFFEEMAKERS OTHER 

4 THAN THOSE WITH CLOCKS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.85.17 Self-contained, carafe-less automatic drip 

coffeemakers, other than those with electronic clocks (provided for in subheading 

8516.71.00) ............................................. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 3299 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1042 Reported in House (RH)]







                                                 House Calendar No. 236
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1042

                          [Report No. 109-688]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6166) to amend title 10, 
   United States Code, to authorize trial by military commission for 
         violations of the law of war, and for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 26, 2006

    Mr. Cole of Oklahoma, from the Committee on Rules, reported the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and 
                         ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6166) to amend title 10, 
   United States Code, to authorize trial by military commission for 
         violations of the law of war, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order without intervention of any point of order to consider in the 
House the bill (H.R. 6166) to amend title 10, United States Code, to 
authorize trial by military commission for violations of the law of 
war, and for other purposes. The amendment printed in the report of the 
Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be considered as 
adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as 
amended, to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) two 
hours of debate, with 80 minutes equally divided and controlled by the 
chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Armed Services 
and 40 minutes equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary; and (2) one 
motion to recommit with or without instructions.
                                                 House Calendar No. 236

109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 1042

                          [Report No. 109-688]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6166) to amend title 10, 
   United States Code, to authorize trial by military commission for 
         violations of the law of war, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 26, 2006

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
SUBCHAPTER E - GENERAL CONTRACTING

REQUIREMENTS

PART 1028 - BONDS AND INSURANCE

PART 1032 - CONTRACT FINANCING

PART 1033 - PROTESTS, DISPUTES, AND APPEALS

PART 1028 - BONDS AND INSURANCE

Subpart 1028.3 - Insurance

1028.307 Insurance under cost-reimbursement contracts.

1028.307-1 Group insurance plans.

1028.310 Contract clause for work on a Government installation.

1028.310-70 Agency contract clause for work on a Government installation.

1028.311 Solicitation provision and contract clause on liability insurance under

cost reimbursement contracts.

1028.311-2 Agency solicitation provisions and contract clauses.

PART 1032 - CONTRACT FINANCING

Subpart 1032.1 - Non-Commercial Item Purchase Financing

1032.113 Customary contract financing.

Subpart 1032.2 - Commercial Item Purchase Financing

1032.202 General.

1032.202-1 Policy.

Subpart 1032.7 - Contract Funding

1032.770 Incremental funding during a Continuing Resolution.

1032.770-1 Scope of section.

1032.770-2 Definition.

1032.770-3 General.

1032.770-4 Policy.

1032.770-5 Limitations.

1032.770-6 Procedures.

1032.770-7 Clause.

Subpart 1032.70 - Electronic Submission and Processing of Payment Requests

1032.7000 Scope of subpart.

1032.7001 Definitions.

1032.7002 Policy.

1032.7003 Contract clause.

PART 1033 - PROTESTS, DISPUTES, AND APPEALS

Subpart 1033.2 - Disputes and Appeals

1033.201 Definitions.
1337.204 Guidelines for determining availability of personnel.       The designee authorized to make the determinations described under FAR 37.204 is set forth in CAM 1301.70.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1337.2 - Advisory and Assistance Services
#### In the Matter of Louis Rubinstein, Appellant, v. Marvin D. Cristenfeld et al., and John Bujay et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding to invalidate a certificate designating respondent Stewart in place of respondent Bujay, the latter having declined, as a candidate in the Democratic Party Primary Election to be held on June 17, 1969 for the Party position of County Committeeman for the 18th Election District of the 17th Assembly District in the Town of North Hempstead, Nassau County, and for other relief, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered June 13, 1969, which denied the application and dismissed the petition in the proceeding. Beldoek, P. J., Rabin, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1071 

Recognizing the 25th anniversary of the independence of Belize and extending 

best wishes to Belize for peace and further progress, development, and 

prosperity. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2006 

Ms. LEE (for herself, Mr. RANGEL, Mrs. CHRISTENSEN, Mr. MEEKS of New 

York, Mr. BERMAN, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. PAYNE, and Ms. CARSON) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

International Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 25th anniversary of the independence of 

Belize and extending best wishes to Belize for peace 

and further progress, development, and prosperity. 

Whereas Belize gained full independence from the United 

Kingdom on September 21, 1981, and was established as 

a sovereign and independent country; 

Whereas since Belize became an independent country, the interests of Belize and the United States have been closely 

aligned; 

Whereas the people of Belize have established a unique, pluralistic parliamentary democracy which includes freedoms 

cherished by the people of the United States, including 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1071 IH 

freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of association, and freedom of the press; 

Whereas Belize continues to serve as a model of democratic 

values by regularly holding free and fair elections, and 

promoting a free exchange of ideas; 

Whereas the bonds of association and friendship between the 

peoples of the two countries have been strengthened by 

the number of Belizeans who have migrated to the 

United States, where they make significant contributions 

to both the United States and Belize; and 

Whereas Belize is an integral member of both the Central 

American and Caribbean regions, and is a constructive 

partner of the United States in fulfilling the agenda of 

the Western Hemisphere: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the 25th anniversary of the inde3 pendence of Belize; 

4 (2) extends warm congratulations and best 

5 wishes to Belize for peace, prosperity, and further 

6 progress; and 

7 (3) extends best wishes to Belizeans and 

8 Belizean-Americans residing in the United States as 

9 they celebrate the 25th anniversary of Belize’s inde10 pendence. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
# Subpart 604.2—Contract Distribution

Source:                                80 FR 6915, Feb. 9, 2015, unless otherwise noted.                               

**Parent topic:**PART 604—ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS

## 604.202 Agency distribution requirements.

As necessary, the contracting officer shall distribute copies of the signed contract or modification to those officers/offices involved in contract administrative support functions, e.g., the Contracting Officer's Representative; the requirements office; the Post Occupational Safety and Health Officer (POSHO); the Despatch Agent or other receiving activity, particularly if it is the initial point of contact for receipt of goods or services; the financial management office; and each post or office where the contract shall be performed. Where required by the laws of a foreign country, overseas posts shall retain the original copy of the contract or modification awarded by a domestic contracting activity for performance overseas. The contracting officer shall send copies of contracts and modifications awarded as small business or 8(a) set-asides to OSDBU.
§ 763.6 Limitations. ( a ) To qualify for a guarantee, the purchase price of the farm to be acquired through the land contract sale cannot exceed the lesser of: ( 1 ) $500,000 or
( 2 ) The current market value of the property.
( b ) A guarantee will not be issued if the appraised value of the farm is greater than $500,000.
( c ) Existing land contracts are not eligible for the Land Contract Guarantee Program.
( d ) Guarantees may not be used to establish or support a non-eligible enterprise.