alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PART 8 –– REQUIRED SOURCES OF

SUPPLIES AND SERVICES

 SUBPART 8.4 – FEDERAL SUPPLY SCHEDULES

 8.404 Use of Federal Supply Schedules.

 8.405 Ordering procedures for Federal Supply Schedules.

 8.405-5 Small business.

 8.405-6 Limiting sources.

 SUBPART 208.70 –– COORDINATED ACQUISITIONS

 SUBPART 208.74 – ENTERPRISE SOFTWARE AGREEMENTS

 208.7402 General.

 208.7403 Acquisition procedures.

SUBPART 8.4 – FEDERAL SUPPLY SCHEDULES

8.404 Use of Federal Supply Schedules.

(h)(3)(ii)(A) A determination and findings is not required for time-and-materials or labor-hour CLINS

utilizing Order Level Materials (OLM) under GSA Schedules. The cumulative value of the OLM

CLIN/SLINs shall not exceed 33.33% of the total value of the order or BPA, not including travel.

8.405 Ordering procedures for Federal Supply Schedules.

8.405-5 Small business.

(S-90) For orders against the federal supply schedule exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold,

small business programs are the preferred method when market research has indicated that there is

at least two or more small business schedule contractors that offer services which will meet the

agency’s needs. The socioeconomic small business contracting programs shall be considered first

before considering a small business set-aside.
8.405-6 Limiting sources.

(S-90) Refer to DARS PGI 8.405-6(S-90) for the J&A template for FAR/DFARS/PGI Parts 8

acquisitions.

(S-91) See DARS 6.303-90 for requirements for modified justifications.

SUBPART 208.70 –– COORDINATED ACQUISITIONS

SUBPART 208.74 – ENTERPRISE SOFTWARE AGREEMENTS

208.7402 General.

(S-90) All DoD Joint Enterprise License Agreements and DISA ELAs (J/ELA) executed through the

DISA J/ELA Program Management Office (PMO) are mandatory use if the requirement is within

scope of the J/ELAs. This mandatory requirement includes purchases made with a Government

Purchase Card. All requirements packages are required to be staffed through the J/ELA PMO, prior

to submission to PSD for processing. The Development and Business Center is responsible for the

oversight of the J/ELA PMO.

(S-91) To assist with the JELA scope determination, requirements officials may view the description

for each JELA located at https://www.ditco.disa.mil/contracts/ under ‘Premier Contracts’ .

208.7403 Acquisition procedures.

(S-90) In accordance with DFARS PGI 208.7403(5)(iii), the designated management official is the

DISA CIO.

(S-91) If requiring officials determine that the JELA supports a requirement, but there is an unusual

or compelling circumstance to use another source, the waiver must be completed and submitted

with the acquisition package. The waiver is located at

https://www.ditco.disa.mil/contracts/SampleDocTemplates.asp.
470.203 Cargo preference.

An agency having responsibility under this subpart shall administer its programs, with respect to

this subpart, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Transportation.

Parent topic: PART 470 - COMMODITY ACQUISITIONS
#### BEAUDRY et al. v. McKINNON et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July 10, 1914.)

Action by William A. Beaudry and another against John N. McKinnon and others.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs. Order filed. See, also, 148 N. Y. Supp. 1105.
#### § 966.121 Issuance.

The committee, or its duly authorized agents, shall give prompt consideration to each application for a Certificate of Privilege and shall determine whether the application is approved. Approval of an application shall be evidenced by the issuance of a Certificate of Privilege authorizing the applicant named therein to ship tomatoes for a specified purpose for a specified period of time.
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 1 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 2 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 3 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 4 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 5 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 6 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 7 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 8 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 9 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 10 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 11 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 12 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 13 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 14 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 15 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 16 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 17 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 18 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 19 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 20 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 21 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 22 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 23 of 24
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 24 of 24
Plante MoranPlante & Moran, PLLC    10 South Riverside Plaza 9th Floor Chicago, IL 60606  Tel: 312.207.1040 Fax: 312 .207.1066      plantemotan.com **Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm******To the Board of Directors National Tax Search, LLC We  have  examined  National  Tax  Search's  compliance  with  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission's Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Security and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB  for  the  National  Tax Search TaxQ  system  (the  "Platform")  as  of  and  for  the  year  ended December 31, 2014. The Company has determined that only certain servicing criteria, 1122(d)(l)(ii), 1122(d) 1 (iv), 1122(d)2(ii), 1122(d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)2(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii), are applicable to the activities performed  by it with respect  to the  Platform covered  by this report.  The Company  has  determined  that  the  remaining  servicing  criteria  set  forth  in  Item  1122(d)  of  the  SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities performed by it with respect to the Platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is  to  express  an  opinion  on  management's  assertion  about  the  Company's  compliance  with  the  servicing criteria  based  on  our  examination.  Our  examination  was  conducted  in  accordance  with  standards  of  the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such  other  procedures  as  we  considered  necessary  in  the  circumstances.  Our  examination  included  a selection  of  a  sample  of  transactions  and  compliance  activities  related  to  the  Platform  during  the examination  period  and  determining  whether  the  Company  processed  those  transactions  and  performed those  activities  in  compliance  with  the  servicing  criteria.  Our  testing  of  selected  transactions  and compliance activities was limited to calculations, reports, and activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our  procedures did not include determining whether  errors may have occurred  prior to  our  tests  that  may have affected the  balances or amounts calculated or reported  by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other  transactions. We  believe  that  our  examination  provides  a  reasonable basis  for  our  opinion.  Our  examination  does  not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. In  our  opinion,  management's  assertion  that  the  Company  complied  with  the  aforementioned  servicing criteria  as  of  and  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2014  for  the  Platform  is  fairly  stated  in  all  material respects. /s/ Plante & Moran PLLCChicago, IL January 12, 2015Pravity Member Global Alliance of Independent Firms
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM RENT-A-WRECK
OF AMERICA, INC.'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-QSB.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                         697,120
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,891,272
<ALLOWANCES>                                   807,987
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,801,718
<PP&E>                                         569,203
<DEPRECIATION>                                 328,423
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,293,101
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          784,647
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        42,380
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     16,558
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,449,516
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,293,101
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               947,665
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  410,669
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               244,203
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               107,859
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,486
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                198,857
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,750
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            190,107
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   190,107
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03
        

</TABLE>
No. 89-6654.

#### Ringenberg et ux. *v.*City of Kahoka, Missouri, et al.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*November 20, 2007*

[Cite as *11/20/2007 Case Announcements,*2007-Ohio-6173.]

MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS

2006-2406.

#### Thompson v. Jones-Kelley.

Franklin App. No. 05AP-476, 2006-Ohio-6000. On motion to dismiss the appeal as moot. Motion granted. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., and O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, and O’Connor, JJ., dissent.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3541 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3541

   To suspend temporarily the duty on certain unbleached printcloth.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 20, 2006

  Mr. Graham introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on certain unbleached printcloth.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN UNBLEACHED PRINTCLOTH.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.52.12        Unbleached printcloth,  Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           greater than or equal                                             31/2009          ''
                           to 85 percent by                                                                    .
                           weight of cotton,
                           greater than 100 g/m2
                           but less than or
                           equal to 200 g/m2, of
                           average yarn, number
                           43 to 68, of width
                           exceeding 225
                           centimeters (provided
                           for in subheading
                           5208.12.60)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
SUBPART 12.4 – UNIQUE REQUIREMENTS

REGARDING TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR

COMMERCIAL ITEMS

Parent topic: PART 12 –– ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL ITEMS

12.403 Termination.

(b) Policy. Contracting officers shall coordinate contract/order termination actions with the CoCO,

HCO and legal counsel and, if the contractor is a small business concern, with the Office of Small

Business Programs (OSBP). The HCO and HCA and will be updated in weekly DITCO SITREPs.
Instructions for Submitting Written Comments to the

Federal Docket

The public can provide written comments on EPA’s proposed rulemakings. Comments may

be directed to the appropriate docket as follows:

Rulemaking Docket ID number Comment deadline

Water Quality Standards

Regulatory Clarifications

EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0606 December 3, 2013

How to Submit Comments

Online:

1. Go to www.regulations.gov

2. Enter the docket ID number EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0606 into the search field and click

“Search”

3. Click the "Comment Now!" link to the right of the rule title on the Search Results screen

4. Then enter your organization information in Step 1, type or attach your comment and any

supporting materials in Steps 2 and 3, and finally click the "Submit" button in Step 4

Email:

Email your comments to: ow-docket@epa.gov.

Mail to:

Water Docket, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Attention: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0606

Mail code: 2822T

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20460

Hand Delivery:

EPA Docket Center, EPA West Room 3334

Attention Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0606

1301 Constitution Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20004

Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket’s normal hours of operation, and

special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. Please refer to the

proposed rule for information on the EPA Docket Center hours and special instructions and

tips for submitting comments.

All comments must be submitted to the docket by December 3, 2013
1403.1004 Contract clause.

(a) In all awards expected to exceed $3,000,000, including options, for which performance is

expected to exceed 120 days, except purchases conducted in accordance with FAR Part 12 and

contracts to be performed entirely outside the United States, replace “$5,000,000” with

“$3,000,000” in paragraph (d) of FAR 52.203-14.

(b) Insert the following into paragraph (b)(3) of the same clause: “Downloadable hotline posters as

well as instructions for obtaining a hard copy poster are available at http://www.doioig.gov/hotline.”

Parent topic: Subpart 1403.10 - Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct
Subpart 317.1 - Multi-Year Contracting    **Parent topic:** PART 317 - SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS317.104 General.       (b) The Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) is the agency approving official for determinations under Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 17.104(b).317.105 Policy.317.105-1 Uses.       (a) Each head of the contracting activity (HCA) determination to use multi-year contracting, as defined in FAR 17.103, is limited to individual acquisitions where the full estimated cancellation ceiling does not exceed 20 percent of the total contract value over the multi-year term or $12.5 million, whichever is less. Cancellation ceiling provisions shall conform to the requirements of FAR 17.106-1(c). The determination is not delegable and shall address the issues in FAR 17.105-1(a).          (b)          (1)  			SPE approval is required for any -          (i) Individual determination to use multi-year contracting with a cancellation ceiling in excess of the limits in 317.105-1(a); or          (ii) Class determination (see FAR subpart 1.7).          (2) A determination involving a cancellation ceiling in excess of the limits in 317.105-1(a) shall present a well-documented justification for the estimated cancellation ceiling. When the estimated cancellation ceiling exceeds $12.5 million, the determination shall accompany a draft congressional notification letter pursuant to FAR 17.108 and 317.108.317.107 Options.       When included as part of a multi-year contract, use of options shall not extend the performance of the original requirement beyond 5 years. Options may serve as a means to acquire related services (severable or non-severable) and, upon their exercise, shall receive funding from the then-current fiscal year's appropriation.317.108 Congressional notification.       (a) The SPE shall give the approval of the written notification required by FAR 17.108(a). Upon approval of the determination required by 317.105-1(b)(1), the HCA will finalize and sign the congressional notification letter and provide it to the appropriate House and Senate committees.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

M IDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABA M A

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

September 1, 2006

NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT

Re: Deloise Price v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Civil Action No. #2:06-cv-00721-DRB

The above-styled case has been reassigned to Judge Myron H. Thompson.

Please note that the case number is now #2:06-cv-00721-MHT. This new case number should be

used on all future correspondence and pleadings in this action.

 

Case 2:06-cv-00721-MHT-TFM Document 6 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 1 of 1
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

December 1 , 2022

ERRATA

______________________

Appeal No. 2022

- 1171

TREEHOUSE AVATAR LLC, Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

VALVE CORPORATION, Defendant

- Appellee

______________________

Decided: November 30, 2022 Precedential Opinion

______________________ Please make the following change:

On page 6, lines 34 and 36, “Zydus” is changed to “Zyda.”

On page 11, line 14, “Zydus” is changed to “Zyda.” Case: 22-1171 Document: 36 Page: 1 Filed: 12/01/2022
#### § 1004.1 Purpose and scope.

This part contains the regulations of the Department of Energy (DOE) that implement Freedom of Information (FOIA) 5 U.S.C. 552, Public Law 89-487, as amended by Public Law 93-502, 88 Stat. 1561, by Public Law 94-409, 90 Stat. 1241, by Public Law 99-570, 100 Stat. 3207-49, by Public Law 104-231, 110 Stat. 3048, by Public Law 110-175, 121 Stat. 2524, Public Law 111-83 § 564, 123 Stat. 2142, 2184, and by Public Law 114-185, 130 Stat. 538. The regulations of this part provide information concerning the procedures by which records may be requested from all DOE offices, excluding the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). Records of DOE made available pursuant to the requirements of 5 U.S.C. 552 shall be furnished to members of the public as prescribed by this part. Persons seeking information or records of DOE may find it helpful to consult with a DOE FOIA Officer before invoking the formal procedures set out below. To the extent permitted by other laws, DOE will make records available which it is authorized to withhold under 5 U.S.C. 552 whenever it determines that such disclosure is in the public interest.

[81 FR 94918, Dec. 27, 2016]
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS76485 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 28 Filed 12/27/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 28 Filed 12/27/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 28 Filed 12/27/2006 Page 3 of 3
#### § 983.58 Interhandler transfers.

Within the production area, any handler may transfer pistachios to another handler for additional handling, and any assessments, inspection requirements, aflatoxin testing requirements, and any other marketing order requirements with respect to pistachios so transferred may be assumed by the receiving handler. The committee, with the approval of the Secretary, may establish methods and procedures, including necessary reports, to maintain accurate records for such transfers.

[74 FR 56541, Nov. 2, 2009]
exv10w1







Exhibit 10.1




	 	 	 	 	 
	The Advisory Board Company	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	2445
M. STREET, NW
	 	 	 	 
	WASHINGTON, DC 20037
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	TELEPHONE
202-266-6696

	 	 	 	Robert Musslewhite
	FACSIMILE
202-266-6633

	 	February 4, 2010
	 	Chief Executive Officer





Thomas L. Monahan, III


Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer


The Corporate Executive Board Company


1919 North Lynn Street


Arlington, VA 22209





			
	      Re:	 	Collaboration Agreement, dated as of February 6, 2007, by and between
The Corporate Executive Board Company and The Advisory Board Company (the
“Collaboration Agreement”)




Dear Tom:




     This letter confirms that The Corporate Executive Board Company (“CEB”) and The Advisory
Board Company (“ABCO”) have agreed to extend the Initial NP Term and the Initial EC Term (as
such terms are defined in the Collaboration Agreement) through February 5, 2012 as contemplated
by Sections 3.3(a) and 3.4(a) of the Collaboration Agreement, respectively, effective as of
February 4, 2010.



     Please indicate your agreement with the foregoing by signing and returning one copy of this
letter to my attention, which shall constitute CEB’s and ABCO’s agreement with respect to the
subject matter hereof.



	 	 	 
	 

	 	Very truly yours,
	 

	 	
	 

	 	Robert W. Musslewhite
	 

	 	Chief Executive Officer





ACCEPTED AND AGREED:



THE
CORPORATE EXECUTIVE BOARD COMPANY




	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	
 

	 	 
	 

	 	Thomas L. Monahan, III	 	 
	 

	 	Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer