alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 993.24 Establishment and membership. A Prune Marketing Committee (herein referred to as the “Committee”), consisting of 22 members with an alternate member for each such member, is hereby established to administer the terms and provisions of this part, of whom with their respective alternates, 14 shall represent producers, 7 shall represent handlers, and 1 shall represent the public. Committee membership shall be allocated in accordance with the following grouping with the alternate positions identically allocated: ( a ) Three handler members to represent handlers who are cooperative marketing associations of producers (referred to in this part as “cooperative handlers”);
( b ) Three handler members to represent handlers other than cooperative handlers (referred to in this part as “independent handlers”);
( c ) One handler member to represent handlers who are cooperative handlers or independent handlers, whichever of such handlers handled as first handlers more than 50 percent of the prunes handled by all handlers during the crop year preceding the year in which nominations are made;
( d ) Fourteen producer members to be selected from and to represent producers who are members of cooperative marketing associations (referred to in this part as “cooperative producers”) and producers other than “cooperative producers” (referred to in this part as “independent producers”); the number of the producer members for the cooperative producer group or the independent producer group, as the case may be, shall be in the same proportion, as near as practicable, to the total of 14, as the tonnage of prunes handled by the respective group of cooperative handlers or independent handlers as first handlers during the crop year preceding the year in which nominations are made is to the total tonnage of prunes handled by all handlers as first handlers.
( e ) The public member and alternate shall have no financial interest in the prune industry.
[26 FR 476, Jan. 19, 1961, as amended at 46 FR 61636, Dec. 18, 1981]
222 So.2d 880

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Raymond Eugene CRUMM and Wilbert James Smith.

No. 49880.

June 5, 1969.

In re: State of Louisiana applying for writ of certiorari.

The petition of the relator in the above •entitled and numbered case having been •duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Rudolph F. Becker, Jr., Judge of the Criminal District Court for the Parish of Orleans, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 13th day of October, 1969, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein,- to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondents through their attorney shall show cause, in this court, on the date aforesaid, at 11 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

CAMELLIA THERAPEUTIC FOSTER )

AGENCY, LLC, REPRESENTED BY )

JOSEPH APPIAH, CHAIRMAN )

CAMELLIA THERAPEUTIC FOSTER )

CHILDREN, FOSTER PARENTS, and )

STAFF, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv735-MHT

)

ALABAMA DEPT. OF )

HUMAN RESOURCES, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

Upon consideration of the plaintiff corporation’s motion for appointment of counsel

(doc. # 28) and upon the court’s review of the complaint filed in this case, it is

ORDERED that the motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED.

Done this 5th day of March, 2007.

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00735-MHT-CSC Document 29 Filed 03/05/2007 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATION

I, Bennett K. Hatfield, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Patriot Coal Corporation; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 30, 2013



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ BENNETT K. HATFIELD
|Bennett K. Hatfield    
|Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3355 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3355

          To suspend temporarily the duty on Fast Red B Base.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 5, 2006

  Mr. Kennedy introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on Fast Red B Base.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FAST RED B BASE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.31.18        p-Nitro-o-Anisidine     Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           (CAS No. 97-52-9)                                                 31/2009          ''
                           (provided for in                                                                    .
                           subheading
                           2922.29.80)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Margaret E. Brodine, as Clerk of the City Court of the City of Jamestown.

Order for destruction of records entered. (Order entered Feb. 26, 1970.)
1309.507-2 Contract clauses.

(a) In accordance with FAR 9.507-2, insert clause 1352.209-71, Limitation of Future Contracting,

substantially as written, when the contractor's eligibility for future prime contract or subcontract

awards shall be restricted because of services being provided as stated in FAR 9.505-1 through

9.505-4.

(1) Insert the basic clause when the contractor will be providing systems engineering and/or

technical direction. (See FAR 9.505-1)

(2) Insert the clause with its Alternate I when the contractor will be preparing specifications or work

statements. (See FAR 9.505-2)

(3) Insert the clause with its Alternate II when the contractor will be providing technical evaluation

or advisory and assistance services. (See FAR 9.505-3)

(4) Insert the clause with its Alternate III when the contractor will be obtaining access to proprietary

information. (See FAR 9.505-4)

(5) Insert the clause with its Alternate IV when the contract is a task order contract. The contracting

officer may modify Alternate IV to include a list of systems for which task orders may be issued and

indicate which organizational conflict of interest provision in paragraph (a)(2) of this clause shall

apply.

(6) Insert the clause with its Alternate V when the contract provides for delivery orders. The

contracting officer shall indicate in each delivery order which organizational conflict of interest

provision in paragraph (a)(2) of this clause shall apply.

(7) Insert the language in Alternate VI when it is necessary to have the restrictions of this clause

included in all or some subcontracts, teaming arrangements, and other agreements calling for

performance of work related to the contract.

(b) Insert clause 1352.209-72, Restrictions against Disclosure, in service contracts, including

architect-engineer contracts, and supply and construction contracts requiring a restriction on the

release of information developed or obtained in connection with performance of the contract.

(c) Insert the clause 1352.209-73, Compliance with the Laws, in all solicitations and contracts.

(d) Insert the clause 1352.209-74, Organizational Conflict of Interest, in all solicitations and

contracts.

(e) Insert clause 1352.209-75, Title 13 and Non-Disclosure Requirements, in all solicitations and

contracts for services where the contractor will have access to Title 13 data.

Parent topic: Subpart 1309.5 - Organizational and Consultant Conflicts of Interest
[875 NE2d 883, 844 NYS2d 165]

#### Lisa Bishop et al., Appellants, v Rona Maurer, Defendant, and Goodkind Labaton Rudoff & Sucharow, LLP, et al., Respondents.

Decided September 18, 2007

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Lawrence H. Silverman,*New York City, for appellants.

*Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP,*New York City *(Roy L. Reardon of*counsel), for respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with *911costs, and the certified question not answered on the ground that it is unnecessary. It is true that plaintiffs here, as is normally the case, are bound by the estate planning documents decedent signed. Nevertheless, the conclusiveness of the underlying agreement does not absolutely preclude an action for professional malpractice against an attorney for negligently giving to a client an incorrect explanation of the contents of a legal document *(see Arnav Indus., Inc. Retirement Trust v Brown, Raysman, Millstein, Felder & Steiner,*96 NY2d 300, 305 [2001]). Here, however, plaintiffs’ complaint is devoid of any nonconclusory allegation that incorrect advice was given.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur in memorandum.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, etc.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

DAVID WILLIAM REEKS, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-30177 

D.C. No. 1:17-cr-00022-SPW 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 12, 2018**

Before: RAWLINSON, CLIFTON, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges. 

David William Reeks appeals from the district court’s judgment and 

challenges the 120-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction 

for bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). We have jurisdiction under 

28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, Reeks’s 

request for oral argument is denied.

FILED

JUN 15 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 17-30177 

Reeks argues that the district court placed too much weight on the nature and 

circumstances of the offense, and too little weight on his remorse and substance 

abuse and mental health issues, resulting in a substantively unreasonable sentence. 

The district court did not abuse its discretion. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 

38, 51 (2007). The record reflects that the court considered several of the 18 

U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors before imposing the sentence. The aboveGuidelines sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the section 3553(a) 

factors and the totality of the circumstances, including Reeks’s criminal history 

and then-pending state charges. See Gall, 552 U.S. at 51; United States v. 

Gutierrez-Sanchez, 587 F.3d 904, 908 (9th Cir. 2009) (“The weight to be given the 

various [section 3553(a)] factors in a particular case is for the discretion of the 

district court.”) 

AFFIRMED.
419.602-3 Resolving differences between the

agency and the Small Business

Administration.

The HCA is authorized to appeal the issuance of a COC to SBA Headquarters as provided by FAR

19.602-3(a).

Parent topic: Subpart 419.6 - Certificates of Competency and Determinations of Responsibility
# Costs and Effects of Parity for Mental Health and Substance Abuse Insurance Benefits

Merrile Sing; Steven Hill; Suzanne Smolkin; Nancy Heiser

##   Additional Details  

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Admin (SAMHSA)

1 Choke Cherry Road, Rockville, MD20857, United States

Mathematica Policy Research, Inc

P.O. Box 2393, Princeton, NJ08540, United States

NCJRS Photocopy Services

Box 6000, Rockville, MD20849-6000, United States

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Admin (SAMHSA)

1 Choke Cherry Road, Rockville, MD20857, United States

### Downloads

#### *No download available*

### Availability

                        - Find in a Library
                        - Order PDF

### Related Topics

Drug treatmentMental health servicesCase studiesMental healthHealth and mental health
#### Tanya Webb, Respondent, v New York Methodist Hospital et al., Appellants.

Submitted October 9, 2007;

decided October 11, 2007

Reported below, 35 AD3d 457.

Motion by New York State Trial Lawyers’ Association for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed.
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

_________________

NO. 09

- 16

- 00115

- CV



### _________________

IN RE STEVE WATKINS , SMW PROJECTS, INC. , RONALD WINTHROP, WINTHROP & ASSOCIATES, INC., AND LARRY D. ROBISON

________________________________________________________________________ Original Proceeding 60th District Court of Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. B

- 195,177

________________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Steve Watkins and SMW Projects, Inc. , joined by Ronald Winthrop and Winthrop & Associates, Inc., and Larry D. Robison, petition for a writ of

mandamus commandin g that the 60th District Court of Jefferson County : (1)

transfer Cause No. B

- 195,177 to Harris County ; (2) grant Relators’ motions for a

continuance of their responses to motion for summary judgment ; (3 ) vacate its order quashing party and expert depositions; ( 4 ) order the real parties in interest,

Burrow Global Constr uction, LLC and Burrow Global, LLC to identify which2 documents a re responsive to which requests for production; ( 5 ) vacate its order sustaining objections by the real parties in interest, Gary Knight and Michael
Burrow, to discovery ; and ( 6 ) vacate its ord er setting aside deemed admissions by Knight and Burrow

. After reviewing the petition for writ of mandamus and the mandamus record that accompanied the petition, we conclude that the relators have

not shown that t he y are entitled to mandamus relief. See In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. , 148 S.W.3d 124, 135

- 36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding); Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 839

- 40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding ) . We deny the petition seeking mandamus relief without prejudice

. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8 (a)

. All pending motions for temporary relief are denied as moot.

PETITION DENIED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on April 15, 2016 Opinion Delivered April 18, 2016 Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson , JJ.
§ 110.90 Computation of time. ( a ) In computing any period of time, the day of the act, event, or default after which the designated period of time begins to run is not included. The last day of the period so computed is included unless it is a Saturday or Sunday, a Federal legal holiday at the place where the action or event is to occur, or a day upon which, because of an emergency closure of the Federal government in Washington, DC, NRC Headquarters does not open for business, in which event the period runs until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, holiday, or emergency closure.
( b ) In time periods of less than seven (7) days, intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, Federal legal holidays, and emergency closures are not counted.
( c ) Whenever an action is required within a prescribed period by a document served under § 110.89 of this part, no additional time is added to the prescribed period except as set forth in 10 CFR 2.306(b).
( d ) To be considered timely, a document must be served: ( 1 ) By 5 p.m. Eastern Time for a document served in person or by expedited service; and
( 2 ) By 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time for a document served by the E-Filing system.
[72 FR 49154, Aug. 28, 2007]
# Subpart 628.1—Bonds and Other Financial Protections

Source:                                59 FR 66763, Dec. 28, 1994, unless otherwise noted.                               

**Parent topic:**PART 628—BONDS AND INSURANCE

## 628.101 Bid guarantees.

## 628.101-1 Policy on use.

(c) The Procurement Executive is the agency head's designee for the purposes of FAR 28.101–1(c).   

## 628.106-6 Furnishing information.

(c) The head of the contracting activity is the agency head's designee for the purposes of FAR 28.106–6(c).
305.7004 Publicizing postaward.

Notices of contract actions exceeding $25,000, funded in whole or in part by the PPHF, shall be

identified on HHS' PPHF Web site at http://www.hhs.gov/open/prevention/index.html no later than 5

days after the contract action occurs.

Parent topic: Subpart 305.70 - Publicizing Requirements Funded From the Affordable Care Act

Prevention and Public Health Fund
SUBCHAPTER D - SOCIOECONOMIC

PROGRAMS

PART 1019 - SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS

PART 1022 - MINORITY AND WOMEN INCLUSION

PART 1019 - SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS

Subpart 1019.2 - Policies

1019.202 Specific policies.

1019.202-70 The Treasury Mentor Protégé Program.

Subpart 1019.8 - Contracting With the Small Business Administration (The 8(a)

Program)

1019.81 Preparing the contracts.

1019.811-3 Contract clauses.

PART 1022 - MINORITY AND WOMEN INCLUSION

Subpart 1022.70 - Fair inclusion of minorities and women

1022.7000 Contract clause.
§ 766.109 Deferral. ( a ) *Conditions for approving deferrals.* The Agency will only consider deferral of loan payments if: ( 1 ) The borrower meets the loan servicing eligibility requirements in § 766.104;
( 2 ) Rescheduling, consolidation, and reamortization of all the borrower's loans, will not result in a feasible plan with 110 percent debt service margin;
( 3 ) The need for deferral is temporary; and
( 4 ) The borrower develops feasible first-year deferral and post-deferral farm operating plans subject to the following: ( i ) The deferral will not create excessive net cash reserves beyond that necessary to develop a feasible plan.
( ii ) The Agency will consider a partial deferral if deferral of the total Agency payment would result in the borrower developing more cash availability than necessary to meet debt repayment obligations.
( b ) *Deferral period.* ( 1 ) The deferral term will not exceed 5 years and will be determined based on the post-deferral plan that results in the: ( i ) Greatest improvement over the first year cash available to service FLP debt;
( ii ) The shortest possible deferral period.
( 2 ) The Agency will distribute interest accrued on the deferred principal portion of the loan equally to payments over the remaining loan term after the deferral period ends.
( c ) *Agency actions when borrower's repayment ability improves.* ( 1 ) If during the deferral period the borrower's repayment ability has increased to allow the borrower to make payments on the deferred loans, the borrower must make supplemental payments, as determined by the Agency. If the borrower agrees to make supplemental payments, but does not do so, the borrower will be considered to be in non-monetary default.
( 2 ) If the Agency determines that the borrower's improved repayment ability will allow graduation, the Agency will require the borrower to graduate in accordance with part 765, subpart C of this chapter.
( d ) *Associated loan servicing.* ( 1 ) The Agency must cancel an existing deferral if the Agency approves any new primary loan servicing action.
( 2 ) Loans deferred will also be serviced in accordance with §§ 766.107, 766.108 and 766.111, as appropriate.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY

ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eye Care centers of America, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Douglas C. Shepard, as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

May
14, 2007



/s/ Douglas C. Shepard Douglas C. ShepardExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO EYE CARE CENTERS OF
AMERICA, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY EYE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                    5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Company's  Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ended June 30, 2000 and is  qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>

<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               6-Mos

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               Jun-30-2000
<CASH>                                      265,782
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                60,445
<ALLOWANCES>                                 13,081
<INVENTORY>                                  13,350
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            334,159
<PP&E>                                      165,285
<DEPRECIATION>                               27,640
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            1,297,623
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       239,497
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                    932,333
<OTHER-SE>                                  125,793
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              1,297,623
<SALES>                                     401,214
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            401,214
<CGS>                                         9,285
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               691,586
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (290,372)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (290,372)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                               (290,372)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0


</TABLE>