alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 987.10 Handler carry-over.

*Handler carry-over* means, as of any date, all marketable dates then held by a handler or for his account (whether or not sold), plus the estimated quantity of marketable dates in ungraded or unprocessed lots then held by said handler.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TTI INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED FOR THE PERIOD ENDED
NOVEMBER 30, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1998
<CASH>                                             138
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  111,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               111,138
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 111,138
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,986
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,037,401
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   111,138
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (21,752)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (21,752)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (21,752)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6057

LARRY MAURICE WILSON, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARION CORRECTIONAL TREATMENT CENTER; J. CODY, MRS.; J. T. HALL, Captain; K. L. OSBORNE, Warden, Department of Corrections (C.C.B.), Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-732-R) Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 8, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry Maurice Wilson, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wilson v. Marion Corr. Ctr. , No. CA-97-732-R (W.D. Va. Dec. 24, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Opinion issued August 19, 2014 .

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 13
- 00905
- CV

——————————— ANTHONIA U. NWANKWO , Appellant

V. SUNNY NWANKWO , Appellee

On Appeal from the 310th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 2002
- 41161

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Anthonia U. Nwankwo , ha s failed to timely file a brief. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 38.6(a) (governing time to file brief), 38.8(a) (governing failure of appellant to file brief). After being notified that this appeal was subject to2

dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismis sal of case). We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for failure to timely file a brief. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Keyes.
APPENDIX I 

DEMOLITION PRACTICES ON NATION LANDS 

COMPLETED AND PLANNED DEMOLITION ON NATION LANDS 

DEMOLITION PHOTOS NATION PARCEL 19 

DEMOLITION PHOTOS NATION PARCEL 26 

DEMOLITION PHOTOS NATION PARCEL 101 

DEMOLITION PHOTOS NATION PARCEL 139 

DEMOLITION PHOTOS NATION PARCEL 286 




 COMPLETED DEMOLITION ON NATION LANDS 

Grouping Parcel Number Address County Description

Group 1 320 4524 Snyder Rd., Verona O House

Group 1 101 5404 Rte 31, Verona @ Thruway O House, Barns & Shed

Group 1 19 5385 Rte 31 Verona ,Golf Barns O 3 barns

Group 1 327 3428 Oneida Place Rd., Verona Beach O House, Barn, Train Car

Group 1 102 5635 Cooper Street O House and Barn

Group 1 118 5085 Townline Rd. Vernon - Clute O House, Farm, Silos

Group 1 244 5559 Cooper Street O House and Garage

Group 1 190 5298 Rte 31 East, Vernon O House, Barns, Sheds, Silos

Group 2 111 346 Peterboro St, Canastota M House, Garage

Group 2 286 5982 Rte 31, Verona StineBrickner O House, Barn, Shed

Group 2 268 5943 Rte 31 Verona Lempart O House, Farm, Silos

Group 2 292 5400 Sager Rd., Verona O House, Sheds

Group 2 139 Rte 31 & Sterling Rd., Verona O Sheds, Mobile Home & Barns

Group 2 205 7105 Rte 46, Verona (New London) O House, Shed

Group 2 103 3651 Foster Corners Rd., Durhamville O House

Group 2 150 4137 Rte 31 Lenox M 2 Houses, Shed

Group 2 308 6795 Rte 13 Darryl's, Verona Beach O Auto Garage

Group 2 238 5205 Beacon Light Rd O Single Family House

Group 2 218 Rte 31, Lenox M NA

Group 2 176 Sand Hill Rd O House, Barn

Group 2 159 2901 Whitelaw Rd., Lenox M House, Sheds, Barn

Group 2 253 5387 Hill Rd., Verona O House, Barn, Garage

Group 2 301 5389 Hill Rd., Verona O House

Group 2 59 3939 Fosters Corners Rd., Verona M House, Barns & Shed

Group 2 90 3816 Tipp St. Durhamville, Verona O Foundation, Sheds, Fencing

Group 2 290 501 New Boston St., Lenox M House, Sheds

Group 2 175 5444 E. Seneca St VernonWagon Wheel Mo O Hotel

Group 2 67 5187 Rte. 365 O Single Family House

Group 2 217 3723 Rte 31 Utica Boat, Lenox M Houses, Store

Group 2 215 Old Gas Station & Bath, Utica Marina, Rte 31 M

Group 2 216 Yellow House Utica Marina M

Group 3 26 6024 Germany Rd. Kobler Barn O Barns & Silos

Group 3 206 2997 Poppleton Rd, Durhamville O House, Farm, Silos

Group 3 304 4957 Burleson Rd., Stockbridge M House,Barn,LogCabin, Shed

Group 3 282 6572 Cook Rd., Stockbridge March House M House (down)

Group 3 171 6583 E. Hill Rd., Stockbridge - Brummer M House

C:\Documents and Settings\zunino\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK4\Nation Completed Demolition List sent.xls
EXAMPLE: NATION PARCEL 19 






EXAMPLE: NATION PARCEL 26 



EXAMPLE: NATION PARCEL 101 








EXAMPLE: NATION PARCEL 139 



EXAMPLE: NATION PARCEL 286
653.000 Scope of part.

This part prescribes DOSAR forms in addition to those provided in FAR Part 53.

Parent topic: PART 653—FORMS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

OWEN J. ROGAL, D.D.S., P.C., 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

SKILSTAF, INC., 

 Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CIVIL ACTION NO. 

3:06-cv-00711-MHT 

UNOPPOSED

DEFENDANT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION 

OF TIME TO REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION 

TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Defendant Skilstaf, Inc. (“Skilstaf”) respectfully moves the Court to grant an 

extension from April 26, 2007, to April 30, 2007, to file a reply to Plaintiff’s Reply 

in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Plaintiff’s 

Opposition”). As grounds for this motion, Skilstaf states as follows: 

1. On April 9, 2007, the Court entered an order, indicating that 

Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment had been set for submission without 

oral argument on April 26, 2007, and that any opposing brief and evidentiary 

materials were due by that date. 

2. Plaintiff filed its Opposition on April 25, 2006. 

Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 45 Filed 04/25/2007 Page 1 of 3
2

3. Skilstaf is gathering information and would like to reply to the 

some of the legal and factual arguments asserted in Plaintiff’s Opposition. 

Skilstaf’s counsel believes that it can gather the necessary information and draft its 

reply by Monday, April 30, 2007. 

4. Pursuant to the Uniform Initial Order, Skilstaf’s counsel 

contacted Plaintiff’s counsel on April 25, 2007, and Plaintiff’s counsel indicated 

that he has no objection to the requested extension. 

WHEREFORE, Skilstaf respectfully moves the Court to grant an 

extension from April 26, 2007, to April 30, 2007, for Skilstaf to respond to 

Plaintiff’s Opposition. 

Respectfully Submitted, 

 s/Charles A. Stewart III 

Charles A. Stewart III (STE067) 

Bradley Arant Rose & White LLP

The Alabama Center for Commerce 

401 Adams Avenue, Suite 780 

Montgomery, AL 36104 

Telephone: (334) 956-7700 

Facsimile: (334) 956-7701 

cstewart@bradleyarant.com

 

Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 45 Filed 04/25/2007 Page 2 of 3
3

s/Amelia T. Driscoll 

Amelia T. Driscoll (DRI016) 

Bradley Arant Rose & White LLP

1819 Fifth Avenue North 

Birmingham, AL 35203-2104 

Telephone: (205) 521-8000 

Facsimile: (205) 521-8800 

adriscoll@bradleyarant.com

Attorneys for Defendant 

Skilstaf, Inc. 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on April 25th, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing 

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification 

of such filing to the following: 

Robert E. Cole 

437 Chestnut Street, Suite 218 

Philadelphia, PA 19109 

Beth A. Friel 

Jeanne L. Bakker 

Mongtomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads 

123 South Broad Street 

Philadelphia, PA 19109 

and I hereby certify that I have mailed by U. S. Postal Service the document to the 

following non-CM/ECF participants: None. 

/s/ Amelia T. Driscoll 

Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 45 Filed 04/25/2007 Page 3 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 3:06-cr-208-MEF

) 

JASON EDWARD COFIELD )

O R D E R

The Court's ORDER (Doc. # 64) entered on April 6, 2007, is hereby VACATED.

DONE this the 1st day of May, 2007.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cr-00208-MEF-CSC Document 66 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>             5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-01-2000
<CASH>                                       5,018,918
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,492,194
<ALLOWANCES>                                   150,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,212,852
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,905,693
<PP&E>                                       1,891,799
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,226,998
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,608,201
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,052,904
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,627,871
<OTHER-SE>                                   (122,283)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,608,201
<SALES>                                      4,777,818
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,777,818
<CGS>                                        2,429,552
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,348,878
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                38,463
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (134,215)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 95,140
<INCOME-TAX>                                    38,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             57,140
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    57,140
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DARNELL HAMRICK,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 155 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 4th day of October, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Case 2:06-cv-00650-MEF-SRW Document 21 Filed 11/22/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00650-MEF-SRW Document 21 Filed 11/22/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00650-MEF-SRW Document 21 Filed 11/22/2006 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 32.2




Certification




I, R.L. Hartshorn, certify, pursuant to Rule 13(a)-14(b) or Rule 15(d)-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Cavitation Technologies, Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Cavitation Technologies, Inc.




/s/ R.L. HartshornName:

R.L. HartshornTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerDate:

October 20, 2011




The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and is not being "filed" as part of the Form 10-K/A or as a separate disclosure document for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), or otherwise subject to liability under that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32.1 is expressly and specifically incorporated by reference in any such filing.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY 

BOARD 

Mr. Gubanc was on leave Wednesday and Thursday. 

A. Plutonium Finishing Plant (PFP) Activities: Key highlights this week include: 

1. Plutonium Reclamation Facility (PRF) Investigation Reports: The accident investigation team expects to 

issue the new review draft of its report today and is requesting comments by next Tuesday. We understand that 

the findings are significantly revised and are focused more on management systems. Additionally, the 

emergency response evaluation team issued a review draft of its report on June 30th. The report is not complete 

as it does not yet include the section on medical response for treatment of the exposed individuals. We will 

review both reports locally, and have copies sent back to DNFSB HQ. 

2. DOE-RL Readiness Assessment (RA) at PFP: On June 30th, Mr. Ogg observed the second drill at PFP (a 

spill drill), conducted for the DOE-RL RA team. although facility management considered the drill to be 

satisfactory with some improvement needed, the RA team consensus was that both the conduct of the drill and 

the operators' response were unsatisfactory. 

B. Canister Storage Building (CSB) Construction: On the morning of July 2nd a crane operator moving a large 

crane around the east side of the CSB lowered the crane hook and choker cable onto an energized 13.8kV power 

line. No one was injured and no damage occurred, but power was interrupted to several buildings in the 200 

East Area. The contractor stopped crane operations at the CSB pending further investigation. 

An iron worker at CSB raised a quality assurance issue this week when he noted non-conforming welds on the 

structural steel received from the vendor. The welds on several pieces of steel in the lay down yard were 

measured and found to be dimensionally smaller than required. The inspection continues and will be extended 

to the steel already in place at the CSB. The contractor also plans a review of acceptance inspection procedures 

and practices. 

C. Budget Threats to DNFSB Milestones: DOE-RL continues to try to reconciling its FY98 and FY99 budgets 

against its commitments (e.g., Tri-Party Agreement, DNFSB milestones). DOE-RL is arranging a July 29-30 

"Workout Session" with DOE-HQ, Hanford contractors, regulators and stakeholders to attempt to reconcile 

demands with available funds. We very clearly expect DOE- RL to approach the DNFSB about obtaining relief 

from existing milestones. 

cc: Board Members 

TO: G. W. Cunningham, Technical Director 

FROM: P.F. Gubanc & D.G. Ogg, Hanford Site Representatives 

SUBJECT: Activity Report for Week Ending July 3, 1997
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-31053

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FELIPE MEDRANO-VICTORIA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:09-CR-23-1

Before KING, JOLLY, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Felipe MedranoVictoria has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Medrano-Victoria has not filed a

response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no

nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

July 22, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 09-31053 Document: 00511182371 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/22/2010
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1090 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1090

   Honoring the life of Ruth Brown and her copyright royalty reform 
        efforts on behalf of rhythm and blues recording artists.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 5, 2006

 Mr. Conyers (for himself, Mr. Sensenbrenner, Mr. Rangel, Mr. Nadler, 
Ms. Lee, and Mr. Scott of Virginia) submitted the following resolution; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Honoring the life of Ruth Brown and her copyright royalty reform 
        efforts on behalf of rhythm and blues recording artists.

Whereas Ruth Brown passed away on November 17, 2006;
Whereas Ruth Brown, a rhythm and blues singer and songwriter known as Miss 
        Rhythm, was one of Atlantic Records' first recording and performing 
        stars;
Whereas Ruth Brown's elegant voice made her a hit from the 1940s onward with 
        such songs as ``So Long'' and ``Teardrops from My Eyes'';
Whereas Ruth Brown's career spanned the post-World War II era through the Civil 
        Rights Movement to the 21st century, a period which also saw the genre 
        of ``race'' music move into the American mainstream;
Whereas Ruth Brown helped found the Rhythm and Blues Foundation in 1988 to 
        recognize, promote, and preserve rhythm and blues music;
Whereas Ruth Brown worked with Congress to advance the cause of copyright 
        royalty reform so that rhythm and blues artists could receive deserved 
        copyright royalties from their music;
Whereas Ruth Brown's talent was recognized with a Tony Award for Best Actress in 
        a Musical in ``Black and Blue'' in 1989, a Grammy Award for her album 
        ``Blues on Broadway'' in 1989, induction into the Rock and Roll Hall of 
        Fame in 1993, and a Lifetime Achievement Award from the Blues Foundation 
        in 1999;
Whereas Ruth Brown's autobiography, ``Miss Rhythm'', received the Ralph J. 
        Gleason Music Book Award; and
Whereas Ruth Brown is survived by 2 sons, 4 siblings, 3 grandchildren, and a 
        multitude of cousins, nieces, nephews, friends, and admirers: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) honors the life of Ruth Brown;
            (2) recognizes Ruth Brown for her efforts toward reforming 
        the copyright royalty system on behalf of rhythm and blues 
        recording artists;
            (3) commends Ruth Brown for her success in ensuring that 
        rhythm and blues recording artists would receive deserved 
        copyright royalties; and
            (4) expresses its deepest condolences to Ruth Brown's 
        family and friends.
                                 <all>
```
Subpart 302.1 - Definitions

Parent topic: PART 302 - DEFINITIONS OF WORDS AND TERMS

302.101 Definitions.

(a) Agency head or head of the agency, unless otherwise stated, means the Secretary of Health and

Human Services or specified designee.

(b) Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) is a Federal employee designated in writing by a

contracting officer to act as the contracting officer's representative in monitoring and administering

specified aspects of contractor performance after award of a contract or order. In accordance with

local procedures, operating divisions (OPDIVs) or staff divisions (STAFFDIVs) may designate CORs

for firm fixed-price contracts or orders. COR's responsibilities may include verifying that:

(1) The contractor's performance meets the standards set forth in the contract or order;

(2) The contractor meets the contract or order's technical requirements by the specified delivery

date(s) or within the period of performance; and

(3) The contractor performs within cost ceiling stated in the contract or order. CORs must meet the

training and certification requirements specified in PGI 301.604.

(c) Head of the Contracting Activity (HCA) is an official having overall responsibility for managing a

contracting activity, i.e. the organization within an OPDIV or STAFFDIV or other HHS organization

which has been delegated broad authority regarding the conduct of acquisition functions.