alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
337.103 Contracting officer responsibility.

(d)

(1) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 352.237-70, Pro-Children Act, in solicitations,

contracts, and orders that involve:

(i) Kindergarten, elementary, or secondary education or library services; or

(ii) Health or daycare services that are provided to children under the age of 18 on a routine or

regular basis pursuant to the Pro-Children Act of 1994 (20 U.S.C. 6081-6084).

(2) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 352.237-71, Crime Control Act - Reporting of

Child Abuse, in solicitations, contracts, and orders that require performance on Federal land or in a

federally operated (or contracted) facility and involve the professions/activities performed by

persons specified in the Crime Control Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 13031) including, but not limited to,

teachers, social workers, physicians, nurses, dentists, health care practitioners, optometrists,

psychologists, emergency medical technicians, alcohol or drug treatment personnel, child care

workers and administrators, emergency medical technicians and ambulance drivers.

(3) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 352.237-72, Crime Control Act - Requirement for

Background Checks, in solicitations, contracts, and orders that involve providing child care services

to children under the age of 18, including social services, health and mental health care, child- (day)

care, education (whether or not directly involved in teaching), and rehabilitative programs covered

under the Crime Control Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 13041).

(4) Contracting officers supporting the Indian Health Service shall insert the clause at 352.237-73,

Indian Child Protection and Family Violence Act in all solicitations, contracts, and orders when

performance of the contract may involve regular contact with or control over Indian children. The

required declaration shall also be included in Section J of the solicitation and contract.

(e) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 352.237-74, Non-Discrimination in Service

Delivery, in solicitations, contracts, and orders to deliver services under HHS' programs directly to

the public.

(f) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 352.237-75, Key Personnel, in solicitations and

contracts when the contracting officer will require the contractor to designate contractor key

personnel.

Parent topic: Subpart 337.1 - Service Contracts - General
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-18-00319-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF N.D.S. AND I.F.S., Children

From the County Court at Law, Starr County, Texas

Trial Court No. CC-16-367

Honorable Romero Molina, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: November 21, 2018

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

An appellate court is authorized to dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution when the 

appellant fails to file her brief by the deadline and gives no reasonable explanation for such failure. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 38(a)(1). On October 11, 2018, this court ordered appellant to file her appellant’s

brief and a written response reasonably explaining (1) her failure to timely file the brief and (2) 

why appellee is not significantly injured by appellant’s failure to timely file a brief. Appellant has 

failed to comply with or respond to this order. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of 

prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38(a)(1); 42.3(c).

PER CURIAM
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v ) CR. NO. 2:06cr202-WKW

)

EUGENE L. CLECKLER )

ORDER

Now pending before the court is defendant Eugene Cleckler’s request for disclosure

(doc. # 23) filed on August 18, 2008. This motion is inconsistent with this court’s standing

order on criminal discovery which may be found at the court’s website:

http://www.almd.uscourts.gov/Web%20Orders%20&%20Info/Criminal%20Discovery%2

0General%20Order.htm. Under the standing procedures of the court, the United States will

provide discovery to the defendant at the time of arraignment. Accordingly, upon

consideration of the motion filed by the defendant, it is

ORDERED that this motion be and are hereby DENIED.

Done this 23 day of August, 2006. rd

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 26 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### § 1060.401 Applicability of internal DOE rules.

Payment of travel expenses under § 1060.101(a) (1) through (5) shall be subject to other Department rules relating to authorization of travel.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-15-00516-CR

David Ryan HOWARD,

Appellant

v.

The State 

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 14, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 482451

Honorable Susan Skinner, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE ANGELINI, AND JUSTICE BARNARD

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED October 28, 2015.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
EX-35.7


(logo) WELLS FARGO

Wells Fargo Bank, Na
CMBS Department
MAC N9401-011
1055 10th Avenue S.e.
Minneapolis, MN  55414



Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation
60 Wall Street
New York, NY 10005


RE:  Annual Statement of Compliance

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as
Custodian(in such capacity, "Wells Fargo"),hereby certifies as follows as of
and for the year ending December 31, 2012 (the "reporting period"):

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the reporting period and of its
performance under the applicable servicing agreement(s) listed on Schedule A
hereto (the "Servicing Agreement(s)") has been made under my supervision; and

(b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all
material respects throughout the reporting period, except as noted on Schedule
B.



October 25, 2013

/s/ Kathleen Marshall
Kathleen Marshall
Vice President



Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


(page)


To:  Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation

Schedule A


List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series


1. Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2012, by and among
DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as Depositor, MIDLAND LOAN
SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer,
MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special
Servicer, and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and Wells
Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee, Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and
Custodian relating to the Series COMM 2012-CCRE5 Commercial Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates.


(page)


To:  Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation

Schedule B


Material Non-Compliance with Servicing Obligations

Not Applicable
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 7268]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and                               ( print page 78336)                            Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Thomas Lawrence: Regency Power and Brilliance,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Yale Center for British Art, New Haven, CT, from on or about February 24, 2011, until on or about June 5, 2011, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register.**

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/632-6473). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

Dated: December 7, 2010.

Ann Stock,

Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2010-31499 Filed 12-14-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
#### § 1021.342 Interagency cooperation.

For DOE programs that involve another Federal agency or agencies in related decisions subject to NEPA, DOE will comply with the requirements of 40 CFR 1501.5 and 1501.6. As part of this process, DOE shall cooperate with the other agencies in developing environmental information and in determining whether a proposal requires preparation of an EIS or EA, or can be categorically excluded from preparation of either. Further, where appropriate and acceptable to the other agencies, DOE shall develop or cooperate in the development of interagency agreements to facilitate coordination and to reduce delay and duplication.
MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

2008-0147.

#### State ex rel. Coughlin v. Summit Cty. Bd. of Elections.

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus/prohibition involving an expedited election matter. Upon consideration of relators’ application for dismissal,

It is ordered by the court that the application for dismissal is granted. Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3094 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Handtmann multi-axis drilling and 

routing machines. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. BROWNBACK introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Handtmann multi-axis 

drilling and routing machines. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HANDTMANN MULTI-AXIS DRILLING AND ROUT4 ING MACHINES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.84.59 Handtmann multi-axis drilling and routing machines (provided for in subheading 

8459.21.00) ............................................. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 3094 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) Case No. 3:06CR204-MEF

)

HENRY ERIK YAPIAS )

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER

A pretrial conference was held on October 13, 2006 before the undersigned

Magistrate Judge. Present at this conference was the Honorable Jennifer Hart, counsel for

the defendant, and Assistant United States Attorney Christopher Snyder, counsel for the

government. As a result of the conference, it is

ORDERED as follows:

1. Jury selection is set for November 27, 2006. The trial of this case is set for the

trial term commencing on November 27, 2006 before Chief United States District Judge

Mark E. Fuller and is expected to last two trial days.

2. There are no motions currently pending.

3. Proposed voir dire questions shall be filed on or before November 20, 2006.

Counsel should not include questions seeking information which is provided in the jury

questionnaire.

4. All Motions in Limine shall be filed on or before November 20, 2006. Motions

in Limine must be accompanied by a brief. Failure to file a brief will result in denial of the

motion.

Case 3:06-cr-00204-MEF-CSC Document 15 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 1 of 2
5. Proposed jury instructions shall be filed on or before November 20, 2006.

6. The court will not consider a plea pursuant to Rule 11(c) (1)(A) or (C) unless

notice is filed on or before noon on November 15, 2006. The government and defendant

are informed that if a defendant waits until the last minute to enter a plea, and if that plea, for

whatever reason, is not accepted by the court, the defendant and the government will be

expected to be prepared to go to trial on November 27, 2006. The court will not continue

the trial of this case as to any defendant because a defendant’s plea was not accepted. In

other words, the defendant and the government should not wait until the last minute for a

defendant to enter a guilty plea, and both the defendant and the government should all be

ready to go to trial on November 27, 2006, as to all defendants, even though a particular

guilty plea was not accepted by the court.

Done this 16 day of October, 2006. th

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cr-00204-MEF-CSC Document 15 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 2 of 2
###### Editorial Note on Part 982

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 61 FR 17559, Apr. 22, 1996.

#### § 982.3 Person.

*Person* means an individual, partnership, corporation, association, or any other business unit.
SUBCHAPTER H—CLAUSES AND FORMS

PART 652—SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES

PART 653—FORMS

PARTS 654–699 [RESERVED]

PART 652—SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES

652.000 Scope of part.

Subpart 652.1—Instructions for Using Provisions and Clauses

652.100 Scope of subpart.

652.100-70 Policy.

652.102 Incorporating provisions and clauses.

652.102-1 Incorporation by reference.

Subpart 652.2—Text of Provisions and Clauses

652.200 Scope of subpart.

652.204-70 Department of State Personal Identification Card Policy and

Procedures.

652.206-70 Advocate for Competition/Ombudsman.

652.215-70 Examination of records.

652.216-70 Ordering—Indefinite-Delivery Contract.

652.216-71 Price Adjustment.

652.219-70 Department of State Subcontracting Goals.

652.219-71 Section 8(a) Direct Awards.

652.219-72 Department of State Mentor-Protégé Program.

652.219-73 Mentor Requirements and Evaluation.

652.225-70 Arab League Boycott of Israel.

652.225-71 Section 8(a) of the Export Administration Act of 1979, as Amended.

652.228-70 Defense Base Act—Covered Contractor Employees.

652.228-71 Worker's Compensation Insurance (Defense Base Act)—Services.

652.229-70 Excise Tax Exemption Statement for Contractors Within the United

States.

652.229-71 Personal Property Disposition at Posts Abroad.

652.232-70 Payment Schedule and Invoice Submission (Fixed-Price).

652.232-71 Voucher Submission (Cost-Reimbursement).

652.232-72 Limitation of Funds.

652.236-70 Additional Safety Measures.

652.236-71 Foreign Service Buildings Act, as Amended.

652.236-72 Statement of Qualifications for the Omnibus Diplomatic Security and

Antiterrorism Act.

652.237-70 Compensatory time off.

652.237-71 [Reserved]

652.237-72 Observance of Legal Holidays and Administrative Leave.

652.237-73 Statement of Qualifications for Preference as a U.S. Person.

652.239-70 Information Technology Security Plan and Accreditation.

652.239-71 Security Requirements for Unclassified Information Technology

Resources.

652.242-70 Contracting Officer's Representative (COR).

652.242-71--652.242-72 [Reserved]

652.242-73 Authorization and Performance.
652.243-70 Notices.

652.245-70 Status of Property Management System.

652.245-71 Special Reports of Government Property.

652.247-70 Notice of Shipments.

652.247-71 Shipping Instructions.

PART 653—FORMS

653.000 Scope of part.

Subpart 653.1—General

653.101 Requirements for use of forms.

653.101-70 Policy.

653.110 Continuation sheets.

Subpart 653.2—Prescription of Forms

653.200 Scope of subpart.

653.213 Simplified acquisition procedures (SF's 18, 30, 44, 1165, OF's 347, 348).

653.217 Special contracting methods.

653.217-70 DOS form DS–1921, Award/Modification of Interagency Acquisition

Agreement.

653.219 Small business programs.

653.219-70 DOS form DS–1910, Small Business Agency Review—Actions Above the

Simplified Acquisition Threshold.

653.219-71 DOS form DS–4053, Department of State Mentor-Protégé Program

Application.

PARTS 654–699 [RESERVED]
#### § 927.25 Failure to nominate.

In the event nominations are not made pursuant to §§ 927.21 and 927.22 on or before June 1 of any year, the Secretary may select members and alternates for members without regard to nominations.
Case 2:06-cv-00721-MHT-TFM Document 8 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00721-MHT-TFM Document 8 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00721-MHT-TFM Document 8 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 3 of 3
§ 1015.505 Minimum amount of referrals to the Department of Justice. ( a ) DOE shall not refer for litigation claims of less than $2,500, exclusive of interest, penalties, and administrative costs, or such other amount as the Attorney General shall from time to time prescribe. The DOJ promptly shall notify DOE if the Attorney General changes this minimum amount.
( b ) DOE shall not refer claims of less than the minimum amount unless: ( 1 ) Litigation to collect such smaller claims is important to ensure compliance with DOE's policies or programs;
( 2 ) The claim is being referred solely for the purpose of securing a judgment against the debtor, which will be filed as a lien against the debtor's property pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 3201 and returned to DOE for enforcement; or
( 3 ) The debtor has the clear ability to pay the claim and the Government effectively can enforce payment, with due regard for the exemptions available to the debtor under state and Federal law and the judicial remedies available to the Government.
( 4 ) DOE will consult with the Financial Litigation Staff of the Executive Office for United States Attorneys in the DOJ prior to referring claims valued at less than the minimum amount.
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 6 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 1 of 1
(January 19, 1967)

#### Kippen *&*Company, Inc., Appellant, v. Charles R. Stahl et al., Respondents.

Order entered October 7, 1966 denying plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the counterclaims of defendants, Stahl and Canamet, unanimously reversed on the law and the facts, with $30 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion granted, with $10 costs. The record indicates á delay of some 32 months in prosecuting the counterclaims here involved. There is no reasonable or justifiable excuse given for such delay and, accordingly, in the circumstances of this ease the counterclaims should have been dismissed. *(Commercial Credit Corp.*v. *Lafayette Lincoln-Mercury,*17 N Y 2d 367.) Moreover, a sufficient showing of merit has not been made. Concur — Stevens, J. P., Steuer, Capozzoli and Rabin, JJ.
# SUBCHAPTER F - SPECIAL CATEGORIES OF CONTRACTING

- PART 1535 - RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING 
- PART 1536 - CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS 
- PART 1537 - SERVICE CONTRACTING 
- PART 1539 - ACQUISITION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 

- PART 1535 - RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING    - 1535.007   Solicitations.
  - 1535.007-70   Contract clauses.
- PART 1536 - CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS    - Subpart 1536.2 - Special Aspects of Contracting for Construction     - 1536.209   Construction contracts with architect-engineer firms.
  - Subpart 1536.5 - Contract Clauses     - 1536.521   Specifications and drawings for construction.
  - Subpart 1536.6 - Architect-Engineer Services     - 1536.602   Selection of firms for architect-engineer contracts.
    - 1536.602-2   Establishment of evaluation boards.
- PART 1537 - SERVICE CONTRACTING    - Subpart 1537.1 - Service Contracts - General     - 1537.110   Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.
- PART 1539 - ACQUISITION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY    - Subpart 1539.1 - Commercial Supplier Agreements
  - Subpart 1539.2 - Open Source Software     - § 1539.2071   Contract clause.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,873,167
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,541,457
<ALLOWANCES>                                   733,547
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,089,586
<PP&E>                                         679,604
<DEPRECIATION>                                 415,705
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,616,479
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,511,673
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           11,300
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        39,432
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,054,074
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,616,479
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,479,161
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  570,708
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               512,933
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                74,629
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,614
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                338,670
<INCOME-TAX>                                   105,639
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            233,031
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   233,031
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04


</TABLE>
#### § 981.13 Handler.

*Handler* means any person handling almonds during any crop year, except that such term shall not include either a grower who sells only almonds of his own production at retail at a roadside stand operated by him, or a person receiving almonds from growers and other persons and delivering these almonds to a handler.

[41 FR 26852, June 30, 1976]