alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Centenary International
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30,
2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Hector A. Patron Costas, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Hector A. Patron Costas
--------------------------------

Hector A. Patron Costas
Chief Executive Officer
March 2, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-QSB solely
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and are not
being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.
5619.705-4 Reviewing the Subcontract Plan.    (d) All subcontracting plans that contain a Small Disadvantage Business goal of less than 5% must be approved one level above the contracting officer. If the primary contracting officer is also the office/division chief, then forward the subcontracting plan to the command’s Director of Small Business Programs for approval.              HQ, United States Special Operations Command       Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L-K)       SOFARS 5619       February 2007 **Parent topic:** 5619.705 Responsibilities of the Contracting Officer Under the Subcontract Assistance Program.
1506.303-2 Content.       The documentation requirements in this section apply only to acquisitions processed using other than small purchase procedures. (Refer to 1513.170 for documentation for small purchase acquisitions).          (a) The initiating office shall prepare a written justification for other than full and open competition (JOFOC) that documents the facts and circumstances substantiating the infeasibility of full and open competition for each recommended limited sources or sole source acquisition when required by FAR 6.302.          (b) The recommendation shall be entitled “Justification for Other Than Full and Open Competition” and shall be signed at the programmatic Division Director or comparable office level prior to submission with the procurement request. The JOFOC shall contain the information prescribed in FAR 6.303-2 (a) and (b).          (c) If unusual and compelling urgency (see FAR 6.303-2) is a basis for the JOFOC, then the following applies. Explain the circumstances that led to the need for an urgent contractual action. Explain why the requirement could not have been processed in sufficient time to permit full and open competition. It should be noted that the existence of legislation, court order, or Presidential mandate is not, of itself, a sufficient basis for a JOFOC. However, the circumstances necessitating legislation, court order, or Presidential mandate may justify contractual action on an other than full and open competition basis.          (d) If the proposed acquisition has been synopsized in accordance with the applicable requirements in FAR subpart 5.2, the Contracting Officer must incorporate the evaluation of responses to the synopsis in the JOFOC. (See 1506.371(d) for contents of the evaluation document).    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1506.3 - Other Than Full and Open Competition
IN THE UNITED STATES DIS-TRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DlVlSlON 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

) 

Plaintiff, ) 

j 

) CASENO. 2:06cv736-WKW 

$74,700 IN U.S. CURRENCY, ) 

) 

Defendants, i 

CONFLICT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 

COMES NOW the United States of America Plaintiff , a in the above-captioned 

matter, and in accordance with the order of this Court, making the following disclosure 

concerning parent companies, subsidiaries, partners, limited liability entity members and 

managers, trustees (but not trust beneficiaries), affiliates, or similar entities reportable under 

the provisions of the Middle District of Alabama's General Order No. 3047: 

This party is an individual, or 

This party is a governmental entity, or 

There are no entities to be reported, or 

The following entities and their relationship to the party are hereby reported: 

Reportable Entitv Relationship to Partv 

8/6/2007 

Date 

JOM~ T. HARMON [HAR108] 

(Counsel's Name) 

Urrited States of America 

Counsel for (print names of all parties) 

131 Clavton Street - - 

Montgomery. Alabama 36101-0197 -- Address, City, State Zip Code 

Telephone Number 

Case 2:06-cv-00736-WKW-SRW Document 22 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 1 of 2
IIV THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DlVlSlON 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

1, JOHN T. HARMON , do hereby Certify that a true and correct copy 

of the foregoing has been furnished by electronic mail (manner of service, 

i.e., U.S. Mail, electronic mail, etc.) on this 6th day of August 2007, to: 

all ~arties of record 

8/6/2007 

Date 

Case 2:06-cv-00736-WKW-SRW Document 22 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lance Daniel Jenkins, Appellant.

Submitted October 9, 2007;

decided October 18, 2007

Reported below, 40 AD3d 1308.

Motion for an extension of the time within which to apply for permission to appeal pursuant to CPL 460.20 denied as unnecessary and motion papers treated as a timely CPL 460.20 application.
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19

- 1507 V

UNPUBLISHED

ELIZABETH HURLBUTT

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: March 24, 2021

Special Processing Unit (SPU) ;

Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine

Administration (SIRVA)

Jeffrey S. Pop, Jeffrey S. Pop & Associates, Beverly Hills, CA , for P etitioner.

Andrew Henning , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for R espondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On September 30, 2019

, Elizabeth Hurlbutt filed a petition for compensation under

the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

. 2 (the

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine

administ ration ( “ SIRVA ” ) as a r esul t of an influenza ( “ flu ” ) vaccin e administered on

October 28, 2018 . Petit ion at 1 . The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of

the Office of Special Masters.

On March 24, 2021

, R espondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes

that P etitioner is entitled to compensa tion in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at

1. Specifically, R espondent “ has determin ed that [P]etitioner ’ s medical course is

consistent with a [SIRVA] as defined by the Vaccine Injury Ta ble

. ” Id. at 8 . Respondent

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

- Government Act

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government

Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that

the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755

. Hereinafter, for ease

of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

(2012 ).2

further agrees that Petitio ner suffered the residual effects of her condition for more than

six months

. Id. at 9.

In view of R espondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that

P etitioner is entitle d to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 78 FR 34247, June 7, 2013.

#### § 1.38 [Reserved]
###### Editorial Note on Part 982

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 61 FR 17559, Apr. 22, 1996.

#### § 982.18 Board.

*Board* means the Hazelnut Marketing Board established pursuant to § 982.30.

[46 FR 26038, May 11, 1981]
§ 774.8 Limitations. ( a ) The maximum loan amount any individual or business entity may receive will be 65% of the value of the timely filed proof of claim against AgriBiotech in the bankruptcy proceeding as determined by the Agency.
( b ) Loan funds may not be used to pay expenses incurred for lobbying or related activities.
( c ) Loans may not be made for any purpose which contributes to excessive erosion of highly erodible land or to the conversion of wetlands to produce an agricultural commodity.
§ 1042.420 Access to schools operated by LEAs. A recipient that is a local educational agency shall not, on the basis of sex, exclude any person from admission to: ( a ) Any institution of vocational education operated by such recipient; or
( b ) Any other school or educational unit operated by such recipient, unless such recipient otherwise makes available to such person, pursuant to the same policies and criteria of admission, courses, services, and facilities comparable to each course, service, and facility offered in or through such schools.
613.307-70 File folders for purchase orders,

delivery orders, blanket purchase

agreements, and purchase card transactions.

Contracting officers shall use Forms DS–1918, Purchase Order File; DS–1919, Delivery Order File;

DS–1920, Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) File; and DS–3014, Purchase Card Transaction File

(Actions Exceeding $3,000 Through $25,000), to record relevant data and document those

acquisitions, respectively.

Parent topic: Subpart 613.3—Simplified Acquisition Methods
§ 958.27 Districts. ( a ) For the purpose of selecting committee members, the following districts of the production area are hereby initially established: *District No. 1* (Emmett, Payette, Weiser Area): All territory within the boundaries of Washington, Payette and Gem Counties, in Idaho. *District No. 2* (Oregon Slope): All territory within a boundary following the Snake River northwesterly from its junction with the Malheur River, to the west line of Range 46E; thence south along said west line to the south line of Township 17S, and thence east along said south line to its junction with the Malheur River, and thence northeasterly along the Malheur River to the junction with the Snake River, the point of beginning. *District No. 3* (Ontario, Vale, Jamieson, Brogan): All territory within a boundary starting at the junction of the Malheur River with the Snake River and extending southwestward along the Malheur River to its junction with the south line of Township 17S, E. W. M.; thence westward along this line to its junction with the west line of Range 46E; thence north along this line to its junction with the Snake River; thence northwest along the Snake River to its junction with the north boundary of Malheur County; thence west along the north boundary of Malheur County to the west boundary of the county; thence south along the west boundary of Malheur County to its intersection with the south line of Township 20S; thence east along this line to its junction with the Hyline Canal and Siphon; thence northeast along the Hyline Canal to its intersection with Highway 20; thence east along Highway 20 to Cairo Junction; thence south
1 ⁄ 8 mile to the junction of Highway 20 to Oregon Avenue; thence east along Oregon Avenue to its termination at the Snake River; thence north along the Snake River to its junction with the Malheur River, the point of beginning. *District No. 4* (Nyssa-Adrian): All the area of Malheur County, Oregon, south of District No. 3. *District No. 5* (Parma, Wilder, Nampa, and Notus Area): Canyon County, Idaho. *District No. 6* (Homedale, Marsing, Meridian, Melba, Mountain Home, Glenns Ferry and Twin Falls Area): All counties in the Idaho portion of the production area not included within Districts Nos. 1 and 5.
( b ) The Secretary, upon the recommendation of the committee, may reestablish districts within the production area and may reapportion committee membership among the various districts: *Provided,* That in recommending any such changes in districts or representation, the committee shall give consideration to: ( 1 ) The relative importance of new producing sections;
( 2 ) changes in the relative position of existing districts with respect to onion production;
( 3 ) the geographic location of areas of production as they would affect the efficiency of administering this part;
( 4 ) other relevant factors: *Provided, further,* That there shall be no change in the total number of committee members or in the total number of districts.
[22 FR 26, Jan. 3, 1957. Redesignated at 26 FR 12751, Dec. 30, 1961, as amended at 88 FR 82234, Nov. 24, 2023]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3383 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3383

  To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain drawback 
                 claims relating to petroleum products.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 6, 2006

  Mr. Vitter introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain drawback 
                 claims relating to petroleum products.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DRAWBACK CLAIMS RELATING TO PETROLEUM PRODUCTS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act of 
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other provision of law, the Bureau of 
Customs and Border Protection shall, not later than 90 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, liquidate or reliquidate each 
drawback claim described in subsection (c) at the full amount in each 
such claim.
    (b) Payment of Amounts Due.--Any amounts owed by the United States 
pursuant to liquidations or reliquidations under subsection (a) shall 
be paid by the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection within 90 days 
after such liquidation or reliquidation.
    (c) Drawback Claims.--The drawback claims referred to in subsection 
(a) are the following:

 
 
 
Drawback Claim Number:              Filing Date:
  AA6/0247626-6...................  10/26/95
  AA6/0301055-1...................  09/27/95
  AA6/0303661-4...................  01/22/98
  AA6-0248050-8...................  09/27/95
  AA6-0248051-6...................  09/27/95
  AA6-0248052-4...................  09/27/95
  AA6-0248053-2...................  09/27/95
  AA6-0248054-0...................  09/27/95
  AA6-0248055-7...................  09/27/95
  AA6-0248056-5...................  09/27/95
  AA6-0248057-3...................  09/27/95

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 (the “Report”) of Harvest Capital Credit Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Joseph A. Jolson, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





/s/ Joseph A. JolsonName:Joseph A. JolsonDate:March 12, 2020
§ 990.5 Audit of State or Tribal plan compliance. The Secretary may conduct an audit to determine a State or Indian Tribe's compliance with their approved plan. ( a ) *Frequency of audits.* Compliance audits may be scheduled, no more frequently than every three years, based on available resources. Audits may include an onsite-visit, a desk-audit, or both. The USDA may adjust the frequency of audits if deemed appropriate based on program performance, compliance issues, or other relevant factors identified and provided to the State or Tribal governments by USDA.
( b ) *Scope of audit review.* The audit may include, but is not limited to, a review of the following: ( 1 ) The resources and personnel employed to administer and oversee its approved plan;
( 2 ) The process for licensing and systematic compliance review of hemp producers;
( 3 ) Sampling methods and laboratory testing requirements and components;
( 4 ) Disposal and/or remediation of non-compliant hemp plants or hemp plant material practices, to ensure that correct reporting to the USDA has occurred;
( 5 ) Results of and methodology used for the annual inspections of producers; and
( 6 ) Information collection procedures and information accuracy (*i.e.,* geospatial location, contact information reported to the USDA, legal description of land).
( c ) *Audit reports.* ( 1 ) Audit reports will be issued to the State or Tribal government no later than 60 days after the audit concludes. If the audit reveals that the State or Tribal government is not in compliance with its USDA approved plan, USDA will advise the State or Indian Tribe of non-compliances and the corrective measures that must be completed to come into compliance with the Act and regulations in this part. The USDA will require the State or Indian Tribe to develop a corrective action plan, which must be reviewed and approved by the USDA. The corrective action plan must include a reasonable date by which the State or Indian Tribe will correct make corrections. USDA will approve or deny the corrective action plan within 60 days of its receipt. USDA will conduct a second audit to determine if the State or Indian Tribe is in compliance with the corrective action plan and has corrected the non-compliances.
( 2 ) If the USDA determines that the State or Indian Tribe is not in compliance after the second audit, the USDA may revoke its approval of the State or Tribal plan for one year or until the State or Indian Tribe becomes compliant whichever occurs later. USDA will not approve a State or Indian Tribe's plan until the State or Indian Tribe demonstrates upon inspection that it is in compliance with all regulations in this part.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 14, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

127836 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. BEVERLY HEIKKILA, as Personal Stephen J. Markman, Representative of the ESTATE OF SHERI Justices L. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 127836 COA: 246761 Monroe CC: 00-011135-NI NORTH STAR TRUCKING, INC., Defendant, and

MARC ROLLAND SEVIGNY and J.R. PHILLIPS TRUCKING, LTD. Defendants-Appellants, and

NORTH STAR STEEL CO.,Defendant-CrossPlaintiff-Appellee,

v

INTERNATIONAL MILL SERVICE, INC.Defendant/CrossDefendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to a ppeal the December 7, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), we
direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory acti on permitted by MCR 7.302(G)(1). The parties shall include among
the issues to be addressed at oral argument the questions whether plaintiff created a genuine issue of material fact regarding: (1 ) the duty owed plain tiff's decedent by the slag contractor, the truck driver and the truck owner; and (2) proximate causation as to all defendants. The parties may file supplemental br iefs within 28 days of the date of this order, but they should avoi d submitting a mere restatement of the arguments made in their application papers.

d1010 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 14, 2005

Clerk
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Academic AchievementDiversity (Student)Educational ChangeElementary School TeachersEnglish (Second Language)Faculty DevelopmentLimited English SpeakingSecond Language LearningSecondary School Teachers

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

**IES Cited:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget