NEWYORK 6281034 (2K) 

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

WILLIE MCNAIR, ) 

 ) 

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, ) 

) 

v. ) Case No. 2:06-cv-695-WKW 

 ) 

RICHARD ALLEN, et al., ) 

) 

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. ) 

___________________________________ 

 ) 

JAMES CALLAHAN, ) 

 ) 

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Case No. 2:06-cv-919-WKW 

 ) 

RICHARD ALLEN, et al., ) 

) 

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. ) 

PLAINTIFFS’ OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS 

DESIGNATION OF DEPOSITION TESTIMONY

Grantt Culliver Plaintiffs’ Objections 

Entire Deposition FRE 801, 802, FRCP 32. Plaintiffs object to 

the designation of Grantt Culliver’s entire 

deposition on the basis that such testimony is 

hearsay as to Defendants and not subject to any 

exception. Plaintiffs further object to the 

designation of Grantt Culliver’s entire 

deposition on the basis that it is also 

inadmissible under Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 32. 

EMT-1 Plaintiffs’ Objections 

Entire Deposition FRE 801, 802, FRCP 32. Plaintiffs object to 

the designation of EMT-1’s entire deposition 

Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 108 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 1 of 5
NEWYORK 6281034 (2K) 2 

on the basis that such testimony is hearsay as 

to Defendants and not subject to any exception. 

Plaintiffs further object to the designation of 

EMT-1’s entire deposition on the basis that it 

is also inadmissible under Federal Rule of 

Civil Procedure 32. 

EMT-2 Plaintiffs’ Objections 

Entire Deposition FRE 801, 802, FRCP 32. Plaintiffs object to 

the designation of EMT-2’s entire deposition 

on the basis that such testimony is hearsay as 

to Defendants and not subject to any exception. 

Plaintiffs further object to the designation of 

EMT-2’s entire deposition on the basis that it 

is also inadmissible under Federal Rule of 

Civil Procedure 32. 

DOC-1, DOC-2 and RN Plaintiffs’ Objection 

Entire Depositions FRE 801, 802, FRCP 32. Plaintiffs object to 

the designation of the entire depositions of 

DOC-1, DOC-2 and RN on the basis that such 

testimony is hearsay as to Defendants and not 

subject to any exception. Plaintiffs further 

object to the designation of these depositions 

on the basis that they are also inadmissible 

under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 32. 

Notwithstanding these objections, Plaintiffs 

expect to resolve the use of these deposition 

transcripts in lieu of live testimony through 

negotiations with the Defendants. 

DOC-1 Plaintiffs’ Objection 

39:19-40:02 FRE 611(c). Plaintiffs object to the indicated 

testimony of DOC-1 on the basis that 

Defendants’ counsel’s question is an improper 

leading question. Objection preserved on 

deposition transcript. 

Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 108 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 2 of 5
NEWYORK 6281034 (2K) 3 

41:14-41:21 FRE 611(c). Plaintiffs object to the indicated 

testimony of DOC-1 on the basis that 

Defendants’ counsel’s question is an improper 

leading question. Objection preserved on 

deposition transcript. 

42:06-42:11 FRE 611(c). Plaintiffs object to the indicated 

testimony of DOC-1 on the basis that 

Defendants’ counsel’s question is an improper 

leading question. Objection preserved on 

deposition transcript. 

RN Plaintiffs’ Objection 

27:21-28:01 FRE 611(a). Plaintiffs object to the indicated 

testimony of RN on the basis that Defendants’ 

counsel’s question is an improper question that 

is vague and ambiguous. Objection preserved 

on deposition transcript. 

Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 108 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 3 of 5
NEWYORK 6281034 (2K) 4 

Date: September 19, 2007 

/s/Vincent R. FitzPatrick, Jr. 

VINCENT R. FITZPATRICK, JR. 

HEATHER K. MCDEVITT 

STEPHANIE COHEN 

Bar Numbers (SDNY): 

VF2907; HM9973; SM7006 

Counsel for Plaintiff Willie McNair 

White & Case LLP 

1155 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, NY 10036 

Telephone: (212) 819-8200 

Facsimile: (212) 354-8113 

vfitzpatrick@whitecase.com

hmcdevitt@whitecase.com

stephcohen@whitecase.com 

 - and - 

RANDALL S. SUSSKIND (SUS002) 

CATHLEEN I. PRICE (PRI056) 

Counsel for Plaintiffs Willie McNair 

and James Callahan 

Equal Justice Initiative of Alabama 

122 Commerce Street 

Montgomery, AL 36104 

Telephone: (334) 269-1803 

Facsimile: (334) 269-1806 

rsusskind@eji.org

cprice@eji.org

Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 108 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 4 of 5
NEWYORK 6281034 (2K) 5 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on September 20, 2007, a copy of the foregoing was filed electronically with 

the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to 

the following: J. Clayton Crenshaw, James W. Davis, Corey Maze and Jasper Roberts. 

/s/ Tricia Marlar 

Tricia C. Marlar 

White & Case LLP 

1155 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, NY 10036 

Telephone: (212) 819-8200 

Facsimile: (212) 354-8113 

 tmarlar@whitecase.com

Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 108 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 5 of 5