alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 109

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Small Business 

in the One Hundred Ninth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2005

Mr. MANZULLO submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

Small Business in the One Hundred Ninth Congress.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Small Business 

4 (hereafter in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Com5 mittee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries, there 

6 shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the House 

7 of Representatives for committee salaries and expenses, 

8 not more than $6,034,058 for the One Hundred Ninth 

9 Congress. 
2

•HRES 109 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1—

3 (1) not more than $2,987,331 shall be available 

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

5 noon on January 3, 2005, and ending immediately 

6 before noon on January 3, 2006; and 

7 (2) not more than $3,046,727 shall be available 

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

9 noon on January 3, 2006, and ending immediately 

10 before noon on January 3, 2007. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration.

Æ
(April 27, 1970)

#### Yorkville Restaurant, Inc., Respondent, v. Julius Perlbinder et al., Doing Business Under the Name of 185 E. 85th St. Company, Appellants, and Jermy Coffee Shops, Inc., Respondent.

Order and judgment (one paper) entered on June 10,1969 affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to plaintiff-respondent. Opinion by Stevens, P. J. All concur except McGtvebn, J., who dissents in an opinion. [34 A D 2d 14.] The prior order of this court entered on March 26,1970 is vacated. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Capozzoli, McGivern, Steuer and Tilzer, JJ.
#### AUGENBLICK v. ISRAEL et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 19, 1914.)

Action by Rose Augenblick against David Israel and another.

No opinion. Motion granted, with $10 costs. Order filed.
Subpart 446.3 - Contract Clauses

Parent topic: PART 446 - QUALITY ASSURANCE

446.370 Inspection and acceptance.

The Contracting Officer shall insert the clause at 452.246-70, Inspection and Acceptance, in

contracts where inspection and acceptance will be performed at the same location. The clause with

its Alternate I is for use when inspection and acceptance will be performed at different locations.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION

CHRISTINE BENNETT, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 1:06cv723-MHT

) 

ARMY FLEET SUPPORT, LLC, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that plaintiff Christine Bennett show

cause, if any there be, in writing by October 12, 2007,

as to why defendant Army Fleet Support, LLC’s motion to

enforce mediation settlement agreement (Doc. No. 49)

should not be granted. 

DONE, this the 4th day of October, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 50 Filed 10/04/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Herman Shapiro, Deceased. Anna Shapiro, Appellant; Joseph F. Willis, as Executor of Herman Shapiro, et al., Respondents.

Memorandum by the Court. Appeal from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Sullivan 'County which, in a proceeding to determine the validity and effect of the attempted election by testator’s widow to take her share of decedent’s estate as in intestacy (EPTL 5-1.1), held the widow barred from such election by virtue of the provisions of an antenuptial agreement. The evidence in the present case contained questions of fact for the Surrogate and we perceive no basis for disturbing his findings. The agreement was duly executed and acknowledged and the decision of the Surrogate correctly decides the legal issues argued on this appeal. Decree affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., Greenblott and 'Sweeney, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1045

#### Editorial Notes:Nomenclature changes to part 1045 appear at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023, and 88 FR 82238, Nov. 24, 2023.

§ 1045.220 How does DOE process an MDR appeal for matter containing RD, FRD, or TFNI?

Editorial Notes:

Nomenclature changes to part 1045 appear at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023, and 88 FR 82238, Nov. 24, 2023.

(a) Final appeals for DOE matter containing RD, FRD, or TFNI are submitted to the Director, Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security. The Director, Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security will coordinate appeals concerning Naval Nuclear Propulsion Information with the NNSA Deputy Administrator for Naval Reactors.

(b) The classification and declassification of RD, FRD, and TFNI is governed by the AEA and this part and is not subject to E.O. 13526 or successor orders. Therefore, appeal decisions concerning RD, FRD, or TFNI by the Director, Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security, or the NNSA Deputy Administrator for Naval Reactors are not subject to review by ISCAP.

[83 FR 66007, Dec. 21, 2018, as amended at 88 FR 82238, Nov. 24, 2023]
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

B.B., a minor, by and )

through his mother and )

next friend, OWENA KNOWLES, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 3:06cv715-MHT

) 

PAWN CITY, INC., a )

corporation, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

Based upon the representations made during an on-therecord status conference on April 3, 2007, it is ORDERED

that the uniform scheduling order entered on September

11, 2006 (Doc. No. 9), is vacated. The parties will be

required to submit a new Rule 26(f) report, and the court

will thereafter entered a new uniform scheduling order.

DONE, this the 4th day of April, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 35 Filed 04/04/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### Louis Rosenzweig, Respondent, v. Hawkins, Delafield & Wood, et al., Appellants.

Order entered June 25, 1966, herein appealed from, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements to appellants, and the motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted, with $10 costs. The alleged libelous statements were made during the course of prior litigation concerning the disposition of proceeds of a bank account. It does not appear nor are they shown to be manifestly impertinent to the issues then in litigation or beyond the scope of such issues. As such, an absolute privilege attaches *(Seltzer*v. *Fields,*20 A D 2d 60, affd. 14 N Y 2d 624). Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Rabin and Bastow, JJ.
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 173 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Director 

of National Intelligence should establish and oversee the implementation 

of a uniform, multi-level security clearance system across the intelligence 

community to fully leverage the cultural and linguistic skills of subject 

matter experts and others proficient in foreign languages critical to 

national security. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2005 

Ms. HARMAN (for herself, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mr. REYES, Mr. BOSWELL, Mr. CRAMER, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. HOLT, Mr. RUPPERSBERGER, and 

Mr. TIERNEY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Select Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select) 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

the Director of National Intelligence should establish and 

oversee the implementation of a uniform, multi-level security clearance system across the intelligence community 

to fully leverage the cultural and linguistic skills of subject matter experts and others proficient in foreign languages critical to national security. 

Whereas the security clearance process of the Federal Government often results in undue delay in hiring intelligence community personnel with needed skills and expertise; 
2 

•HRES 173 IH 

Whereas many individuals possessing cultural knowledge and 

linguistic skills critical to the national security of the 

United States do not need to be cleared at the highest 

clearance level; 

Whereas the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention 

Act of 2004 will create a more effective and efficient uniform security clearance process across the Federal Government; 

Whereas the President should ensure the prompt implementation of the security clearance enhancement provisions 

contained in the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004; and 

Whereas the prompt implementation of a uniform, multi-level 

security clearance system across the intelligence community would greatly enhance the ability of the intelligence 

community to carry out its mission: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the Director of National Intelligence 

2 should promptly establish and oversee the implementation 

3 of a uniform, multi-level security clearance system across 

4 the intelligence community to fully leverage the cultural 

5 and linguistic skills of subject matter experts and individ6 uals proficient in foreign languages critical to national se7 curity. 

Æ
Exhibit
32.1



CERTIFICATION

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



(18
U.S.C. 1350)



Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of (18 U.S.C. 1350), the undersigned officer of OnePower Systems Ltd., a Nevada corporation
(the “Company”), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer’s knowledge and belief, that:



| | 1. | The
    Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2015 (the “Form 10-K”) of the Company fully complies
    with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| | 2. | The
    information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all materials respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company.                                                       



|Date: | August
    26, 2016 |  | /s/
    Soha Hamdan                                                                          
|----- | ------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|      |                     |  | Soha
    Hamdan                                                                              
|      |                     |  | Chief
    Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer                                      
|      |                     |  | Principal
    Executive Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer



This
certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise
subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.
#### § 981.54 Payment to handlers for services rendered.

The Board may pay handlers for necessary services rendered by them in connection with almonds eventually disposed of directly by the Board as reserve including but not limited to storing, shelling, sorting, bleaching, grading, packaging, fumigating, and other services in accordance with such schedule of payments and under such conditions as may be established by the Secretary after recommendation of the Board.
April22, 2013 U.S. Department ofTransportation DocketManagement System 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. WestBuilding Ground Floor, Room W12-140 Washington, DC 20590 Dear Sirs: 

### ] NAy I 

## 3 p I: 

## 50

This letter is to petition the U.S. Department ofTransportation onbehalfofAmerican Helicopters, Inc. for an exemption from the requirement for a separate drug and alcohol testing program for both 91.147 operation and 13

### 5 operations. American Helicopter, Inc. is located at 10503 Wakeman Drive, Manassas, Virginia 20110 operates passenger-carrying flights for compensation orhire under 14 CFR §91.147(c)(7) and a charter operation under 14 CFR §135. We are petitioning to combine the drug and alcohol requirements (§91.1047 and §§120.1, 120.3 and 120.5) as both operations are 100% owned and operatedbyAmerican Helicopters, Inc. The 135 pilot is already participating in the drug and alcohol testing program underthe 91.147 operation, therefore; it is redundant to have two separate drug and alcohol testing programs. It is a financial and administrative hardship for American Helicopters, Inc. to maintain two programs. American Helicopters, Inc. strives to maintain an exceptionally high level ofsafety. Combining these operations under one drug and alcohol testing program would in no wayjeopardize safety as the pilot is already enrolled in the American Helicopters, Inc. testing program and is subjectto random drug and alcohol testing. He has already tested negative for his pre-employment drug test and is in the testing pool for random selections. In summary, American Helicopters, Inc. seeks an exemption from the need for two separate drug and alcohol testingprograms because both our operations fall under one company and management and it is redundant to maintain two programs. Thankyou for your attention to this matter. Please contactme with any questions orconcerns regarding this petition.
B.e:·t. Regaft. ds,
... ·. .. . . . , 

# a n4M**~oseley** 'ichlik
. ' • Drug Program Manager 10503 Wakeman Drive Manassas Regional Airport (KHEF) Manassas, Virginia 20110 (703) 368-9599 office (703) 368-9445 fax www.americanheli.com
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

)

vs. ) CASE NO.: 3:06CR208-MEF

)

JASON EDWARD COFIELD )

)

ORDER

For good cause, it is

ORDERED that the Detention Hearing set for September 8, 2006 be and is

hereby RESET for September 13, 2006 at 2:00 p.m., in courtroom 4B, Frank M.

Johnson, Jr United States Courthouse Complex, One Church Street, Montgomery,

Alabama. 

Done this 7 day of September, 2006. th

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cr-00208-MEF-CSC Document 14 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 1 of 1
# Subpart 726.70 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**PART 726—OTHER SOCIOECONOMIC PROGRAMS
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3380 

To suspend temporarily the duty on DEMBB distilled-iso tank. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 6, 2006 

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on DEMBB distilled-iso 

tank. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DEMBB DISTILLED-ISO TANK. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.11.06 2-Bromo-1,3-diethyl-5- 

methylbenzene (CAS No. 

314084–61–2) (DEMBB) 

(provided for in subheading 

2903.69.80) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•S 3380 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
PARTS 754–799 [RESERVED]           **Parent topic:** SUBCHAPTER H—CLAUSES AND FORMS
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3168 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,3-Dibromo-5,5-dimethylhydantoin. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. BOND introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,3-Dibromo-5,5- 

dimethylhydantoin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 1,3-DIBROMO-5,5-DIMETHYLHYDANTOIN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.29.32 1,3-Dibromo-5,5-dimethylhydantoin 

(CAS No. 77–48–5) (provided for in subheading 2933.21.00) ................................ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•S 3168 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
# Subpart 928.1 - Bonds and Other Financial Protections

Source:                                61 FR 41708, Aug. 9, 1996, unless otherwise noted.                               

**Parent topic:**PART 928 - BONDS AND INSURANCE

## 928.101 Bid guarantees.

## 928.101-1 Policy on use.

In addition to the restriction on use of bid guarantees in 48 CFR 28.101-1(a), a bid guarantee may be required only for fixed price or unit price contracts entered into as a result of sealed bidding. They may not be required for negotiated contracts. 

## 928.103 Performance and payment bonds for other than construction contracts.

## 928.103-3 Payment bonds.

A determination that is in the best interest of the Government to require payment bonds in connection with other than construction contracts may be made by the contracting officer on individual acquisitions.   

## 928.103-70 Review of performance and payment bonds for other than construction.

A performance or payment bond, other than an annual bond, shall not antedate the contract to which it pertains.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

CriteriaEducational AssessmentEvaluation MethodsFeedbackPerformance Based AssessmentSamplingScoringScoring RubricsSelf Evaluation (Individuals)Student EvaluationTeaching Methods

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
Case 2:06-cv-00735-MHT-CSC Document 50 Filed 12/05/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00735-MHT-CSC Document 50 Filed 12/05/2007 Page 2 of 2
2403.670 Solicitation provision and contract clause.       Insert the clause at 48 CFR 2452.203-70 in all solicitations and contracts.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2403.6 - Contracts With Government Employees or Organizations Owned or Controlled by Them
Exhibit
      32.2
 
 Section
      1350 Certification
 
 In connection with the quarterly report
of China Industrial Waste Management, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "Report"), I, Guo Xin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 May
      15, 2009
                        
                        /s/ Guo
      XinGuo
      XinChief
      Financial Officer
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

D E ENTERPRISES, LLC, d/b/a CASCADES )

DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No:3:06 CV-692

)

)

ZURICH NORTH AMERICA d/b/a )

ASSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, )

)

Defendant. )

PARTIES’ RENEWED MOTION TO STAY

Plaintiff, DE Enterprises, LLC (“DE Enterprises”) and Defendant, Assurance

Company of America (“ACoA”), move the Court to stay the trial of this action until such

time as the state court action, Cascades Development Group, LLC v. Walnut Hill Water

Authority, et al., in the Circuit Court of Tallapoosa County, Alabama, Civil Action No.

CV-05-61 (“the State Court Action”), has been resolved. As grounds, the parties state as

follows:

1. The parties are in agreement that a resolution of certain issues in the

present action are dependent upon a resolution of ultimate fact and/or legal issues

involved in the State Court Action. It would be an inefficient use of judicial time and

resources to litigate these overlapping issues in two different forums. Accordingly, both

parties agree that this action should be stayed until such time as the State Court Action is

resolved. Further, the parties agree that although the trial of this action should be stayed,

it is in the best interest of both parties as well as judicial economy to allow discovery in

this action to proceed concurrently with the State Court Action.

Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 13 Filed 01/16/2007 Page 1 of 3
2

2. In response to the Court’s January 11, 2007 Order, the parties recognize

that time and expense could have been spared by conferring with one another prior to

seeking relief from the Court, and the parties regret not doing so.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendants respectfully request the Court stay the

trial of this action while allowing discovery to proceed pending the outcome of the State

Court Action.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Amy M. Hazelton__________ /s/ Anne Laurie Smith______________

Lee R. Benton (BENTL8421) THOMAS M. O'HARA (OHART4140)

Amy M. Hazelton (MAYA4742) ANNE LAURIE SMITH (SMITA2262)

Attorneys for Plaintiff DE Enterprises Attorneys for Assurance Company of

LLC America and Zurich North America

Of counsel: Of Counsel:

Benton & Centeno, LLP McDowell, Knight, Roedder & Sledge

2019 Third Avenue North 63 South Royal St., Suite 900

Birmingham, AL 35203 P.O. Box 350

Telephone: 205-278-8000 Mobile, AL 36601

E-mail: Ahazelton@bcattys.com Telephone: 251-432-5300

Facsimile: 251-432-5303

E-mail: asmith@mcdowellknight.com

Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 13 Filed 01/16/2007 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 16th day of January 2007, served a true and correct

copy of the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will

send notification of such filing to the following:

/s/ Anne Laurie Smith______________

COUNSEL:

Lee R. Benton, Esq.

Benton & Centeno LLP

2019 Third Avenue North

Birmingham, AL 35203

Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 13 Filed 01/16/2007 Page 3 of 3