alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
SEPTEMBER 30, 1996, FORM 10-Q FOR GEORGE MASON BANKSHARES, INC. AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          39,353
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                25,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    277,957
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          65,929
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            66,164
<LOANS>                                        362,562
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (5,662)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 847,506
<DEPOSITS>                                     663,076
<SHORT-TERM>                                   114,817
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              8,959
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,567
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,087
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 847,506
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 24,641
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               13,867
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   380
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                38,888
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              15,960
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,510
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           20,378
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      181
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 328
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 24,324
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,968
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       6,968
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,850
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .95
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .95
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.13
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,056
<LOANS-PAST>                                       339
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   733
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 5,529
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      147
<RECOVERIES>                                        99
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                5,662
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             5,662
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            633
        

</TABLE>
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3167 

To extend temporarily the duty on Bentazon. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. BOND introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the duty on Bentazon. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BENTAZON. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.05.10 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Bentazon) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘(bentazon, sodium slat)’’ and 

8 inserting ‘‘(Bentazon, sodium salt)’’; and 

9 (2) by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 subsection (a) apply to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•S 3167 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
908.7121 Special materials.       This section covers the purchase of materials peculiar to the DOE program. While purchases of these materials may be unclassified, the specific quantities, destination or use may be classified (see appropriate sections of the Classification Guide). Contracting officers shall require authorized contractors to obtain the special materials identified in the following subsections in accordance with the following procedures:          (a) *Heavy water.* The Senior Program Official or designee controls the acquisition and production of heavy water for a given program. Request for orders shall be placed directly with the cognizant Senior Program Official or designee.          (b) *Precious metals.*          (1)  			NNSA, Y-12 National Security Complex in Oak Ridge, TN is responsible for maintaining the DOE supply of precious metals. These metals are platinum, palladium, iridium, osmium, rhodium, ruthenium, gold and silver. The NNSA Y-12 National Security Complex has assigned management of these precious metals to its Management and Operating (M&O) contractor. DOE and NNSA offices and authorized contractors shall coordinate with the Y-12 M&O contractor regarding the availability of these metals prior to purchasing in the open market.          (2) For contractor inventory containing precious metals or possessing precious metals excess, see 945.604-1 for contractor identification and reporting.          (c) *Lithium.* Lithium is available from Y-12 at no cost other than normal packing, handling, and shipping charges from Oak Ridge. The excess quantities at Y-12 are the first source of supply prior to procurement of lithium compounds from any other source.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 908.71 - Acquisition of Special Items
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3352 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Naphthol AS-KB. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 5, 2006 

Mr. KENNEDY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Naphthol AS-KB. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NAPHTHOL AS-KB. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.31.17 5′-Chloro-3-Hydroxy-2′-Methyl-2- 

Naphthanilide (CAS No. 135–63–7) 

(provided for in subheading 2924.29.36) Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 3352 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
§ 986.45 American Pecan Council. The American Pecan Council is hereby established consisting of 17 members selected by the Secretary, each of whom shall have an alternate member nominated with the same qualifications as the member. The 17 members shall include nine (9) grower seats, six (6) sheller seats, and two (2) at-large seats allocated to one accumulator and one public member. The grower and sheller nominees and their alternates shall be growers and shellers at the time of their nomination and for the duration of their tenure. Grower and sheller members and their alternates shall be selected by the Secretary from nominees submitted by the Council. The two at-large seats shall be nominated by the Council and appointed by the Secretary. ( a ) Each region shall be allocated the following member seats: ( 1 ) *Eastern Region:* Three (3) growers and two (2) shellers;
( 2 ) *Central Region:* Three (3) growers and two (2) shellers;
( 3 ) *Western Region:* Three (3) growers and two (2) shellers.
( b ) Within each region, the grower and sheller seats shall be defined as follows: ( 1 ) *Grower seats:* Each region shall have a grower Seat 1 and Seat 2 allocated to growers whose acreage is equal to or exceeds 176 pecan acres. Each region shall also have a grower Seat 3 allocated to a grower whose acreage is less than 176 pecan acres.
( 2 ) *Sheller seats:* Each region shall have a sheller Seat 1 allocated to a sheller who handles more than 12.5 million pounds of inshell pecans in the fiscal year preceding nomination, and a sheller Seat 2 allocated to a sheller who handles less than or equal to 12.5 million pounds of inshell pecans in the fiscal year preceding nomination.
( c ) The Council may recommend, subject to the approval of the Secretary, revisions to the above requirements for grower and sheller seats to accommodate changes within the industry.
### Mineral resources of the Mohave Wash Wilderness Study Area, Mohave County, Arizona

By: James G. EvansDavid R. Sherrod**Randall H. HillRobert C. JachensJohn R. McDonnell Jr.

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1704A

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
-                                 Larger Work: This publication is Chapter                                A of                                                                              Mineral resources of Wilderness Study Areas, Havasu Region, Arizona                                                                    
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Exhibit 32.1
  Certification
  I, Todd J. Zelek, certify, pursuant to Rule 13(a)-14(b) or Rule 15(d)-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Cavitation Technologies, Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Cavitation Technologies, Inc.
  /s/ Todd J. ZelekName:

Todd J. ZelekTitle:

Chief Executive OfficerDate:

October 20, 2011
  The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and is not being "filed" as part of the Form 10-K/A or as a separate disclosure document for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), or otherwise subject to liability under that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32.1 is expressly and specifically incorporated by reference in any such filing.
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1336.609-1 Design within funding

limitations.

The designee authorized to make the determination described at FAR 36.609-1(c)(1) to enable

exclusion of the clause at FAR 52.236-22 from the contract is set forth in CAM 1301.70.

Parent topic: Subpart 1336.6 - Architect-Engineer Services
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 7, 2011 

s0131 

Order 

 

February 7, 2011 

141963 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141963 

 COA: 291048 

Wayne CC: 08-004988-FC 

WANZELL ABDULLAH, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 16, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A0225. ETOWAH ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP, LLC v. ADVANCED

DISPOSAL SERVICES, INC.

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW

APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

October 30, 2018

10/30/2018
§ 966.23 Term of office. ( a ) The term of office of committee members, and their respective alternates, shall be for 2 years and shall begin as of August 1 and end as of July 31.
( b ) Committee members and alternates shall serve during the term of office for which they are selected and have qualified, or during that portion thereof beginning on the date on which they qualify during such term of office and continuing until the end thereof, and until their successors are selected and have qualified.
[20 FR 7357, Oct. 4, 1955. Redesignated at 26 FR 12751, Dec. 30, 1961, as amended at 85 FR 72916, Nov. 16, 2020]
ANNEX 10 - NOTICE OF SUSPECTED

VIOLATIONS OF THE GRATUITIES CLAUSE

As required by 5203.203(a), provide a written notice of suspected violations to the Assistant

General Counsel (Acquisition Integrity) at aio@navy.mil .

Include the following information in the notice:

1. Name and contact information of the person reporting

2. Name of Contractor(s)

3. Contract Number (if known) or other information known about the contract, including subject

matter and place of performance

4. Name and location of Government employee(s) involved with the suspected gratuity offered or

provided

5. Brief summary of information or events known regarding the suspected gratuity offered or

provided (including nature, amount, and/or fair market value of the suspected gratuity, if known)

6. How the information was obtained, if relevant
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

February 8, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135682 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. ________________________________________ Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

IN RE IYANA ELIZABETH BAKER, Minor. 

_________________________________________ 

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES,

Petitioner-Appellee, 

v SC: 135682 

 COA: 277928

 Oakland CC

MICHELLE ANN GACH,

Respondent-Appellant. 

 Family Division: 06-728394-NA 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 8, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0205 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

February 8, 2008 

 Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification
Pursuant To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers
of GTX Corp (the ''Company’’), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2012 (the ''Form 10-K’’) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: April 15, 2013 |  | /s/ Patrick E. Bertagna
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                      |  |                        
|Dated: April 15, 2013 |  | /s/ Alex McKean        
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Subpart 1505.5 - Paid Advertisement

[Reserved]

Parent topic: PART 1505 - PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONS
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ParticleDrilling Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, J. Chris Boswell, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)            TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)            Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ J. CHRIS  BOSWELL      |                   |   |   |
|----------------------------|------------------------|--------|--------|
| J. Chris  Boswell          |                   |   |
| *Chief  Financial Officer* |                   |   |
|                       |                   |   |
| Date:                      | February 7,  2008 |   |   |
|                            |                        |        |        |  |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Particle Drilling Technologies, Inc.and will be retained by Particle Drilling Technologies, Inc. and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Exhibit 99




                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gallery of History, Inc., (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Todd Axelrod, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, Rod Lynam, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.




/s  Todd Axelrod                             /s  Rod Lynam
----------------                             -------------
Todd Axelrod                                 Rod Lynam
Chief Executive Officer                      Chief Financial Officer
August 13, 2002                              August 13, 2002
#### § 97.24 Assignee.

The assignee of record of the entire interest in an application is entitled to advance actively or abandon the application to the exclusion of the applicant.
#### Adam J. Stemmler et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. State of New York, Appellant-Respondent.

(Claim No. 45866.)

Herlihy, J. P.

Appeal by the State and cross appeal by the claimants from a judgment of the Court of Claims, entered February 14, 1968, which awarded damages to the claimants. The claimant Helen Stemmier was skating on a roller skating rink on June 6, 1965 when she encountered a group of boys congregated near the railing of the rink and behaving in a boisterous manner. As she skated away from the rail to avoid the group, she was struck by one of the boys and fell, suffering injuries. The State contends that the record does not show that the boys had been congregated and acting in a boisterous manner for a sufficient length of time to support the finding of the trial court that the State provided inadequate supervision. If we were to assume *arguendo*that the present record supports a finding of negligence against the State, the claim would still be dismissed. The injured claimant failed to prove that her injuries resulted from a lack of proper supervision. She did not see the person that struck her. Her husband testified that one of the boys struck her in the back with his hand and caused the fall. There was no testimony that prior to the accident, the boys had been waving their hands and arms about in a manner which was likely to cause accidental injuries. Assuming the general behavior of the boys could be considered so boisterous as to require the State to have admonished them, it does not appear that the giving of such admonition would probably have prevented the present accident. To hold the State liable upon the present record would be tantamount to making it the insurer of patrons of the skating rink as to each other’s negligent conduct. There must be some direct connection between the hazardous conduct of which the State had or should have had notice and the injury resulting therefrom. The claimants have not shown such a connection and, accordingly, they have not shown that the accident resulted from a failure of the State to exercise due care. (See *Pelkey*v. *Brennan,*12 A D 2d 215, 217; *Bloom*v. *Dalu Corp.,*269 App. Div. 192, 193.) This court has recently observed that participants in sporting events generally assume the risks of injury inherent in the nature of the sport but that such “an assumption of risk would not preclude a recovery for negligent acts which unduly enhance such risks” *(Hornstein*v. *State of New York,*30 A D 2d 1012, 1013). That another participant in roller skating might strike the injured claimant was inherent in using the rink, and the claimants have not shown that the negligence, if any, of the State unduly *862enhanced such risk upon the present record. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, and claim dismissed, without costs. Herlihy, J. P., Reynolds, Cooke and 'Greenblott, JJ., concur in memorandum by Herlihy, J. P.; Aulisi, J., not voting.