alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                         Jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           Jun-30-1997
<CASH>                                      18,764
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  3,139
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      74,273
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        74,320
<LOANS>                                    283,659
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,950
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             393,286
<DEPOSITS>                                 316,111
<SHORT-TERM>                                33,400
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,343
<LONG-TERM>                                    978
<COMMON>                                     8,110
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                  32,344
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             393,286
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             12,274
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            2,019
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            14,294
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           4,737
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,208
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        9,086
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  465
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              7,816
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,135
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   2,278
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,278
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                14.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                14.12
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                8.61
<LOANS-NON>                                  8,079
<LOANS-PAST>                                    48
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,675
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  374
<RECOVERIES>                                   184
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,950
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                              0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          0
         

</TABLE>
#### Lucille Gager, as Administratrix of the Estate of Linda Gager, Deceased, Respondent, v Ronald L. White, Appellant.

Order Supreme Court, New York County, entered May 27, 1980, denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the motion granted. In this wrongful death action brought by the administratrix of a deceased who, prior to the time of her death, had been a New York resident, jurisdiction over defendant, a Kentucky resident, was obtained by attaching his automobile liability policy pursuant to *Seider v Roth*(17 NY2d 111). Although the action was commenced within the one-year Statute of Limitations which is applicable in Kentucky, where the accident occurred, that statute has now run. Challenging the constitutionality of the *Seider*attachment, defendant asserted the affirmative defense of lack of in rem or quasi in rem jurisdiction in his answer. Defendant thereafter moved to dismiss for lack of in rem or quasi in rem jurisdiction (CPLR 3211, subd [a], par 9), citing the United States Supreme Court’s decision in *Rush v Savchuk*(444 US 320), decided January 21, 1980, holding that the attachment of a nonresident’s automobile liability policy does not confer jurisdiction over the nonresident "with whom the state has no contacts, ties or relations” *(International Shoe Co. v Washington,*326 US 310, 319). Special Term denied the motion. We reverse. It is not disputed that defendant has no "contacts, ties or relations” with this State. Thus, he is not and has not been amenable to service of process in this jurisdiction. The fiction of his presence, quasi in rem, through the garnishment of his insurer’s obligation to defend and indemnify in connection with this suit, has been eliminated by *Rush (supra).*Consequently, the court is without a defendant against whom further proceedings may be continued. In the absence of jurisdiction the issue of retroactivity becomes academic. The complaint must be dismissed. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ross, Markewich, Yesawich and Carro, JJ. [103 Mise 2d 586.]
ex_105973.htm


Exhibit 10.2.1


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1


TO THE


CATHAY BANK


EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN


 


 


Cathay General Bancorp (the "Company") hereby amends the above-named plan


(the "Plan"), effective as of August 1, 2016, as follows:


 


1.     Section 6.1 (b) of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the reference to "$5,000" where it appears and replacing it with "$1,000."


 


2.     Section 6.2(a)(ii)(B) of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the reference to "$5,000" where it appears and replacing it with "$1 ,000."


 


3.     Section 6.7 of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety.


 


4.     Section 9.4(c) of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the reference to "$5,000" where it appears and replacing it with "$1,000."


 


* * * * * * * *


 


The Company has caused this Amendment No. 1 to be signed on the date indicated below, to be effective as indicated above.


 


 


	
			 

				
			"Company"

				
			 

			
	 	 	 
	Dated: August 18, 2016	CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP	 
	
			 

				
			 

				
			 

				
			 

			
	
			 

				
			 

				
			 

				
			 

			
	
			 

				
			By

				/s/ Dunson K. Cheng	
			 

			
	
			 

				
			 

				
			 

				
			 

			
	
			 

				
			Its

				
			Chairman, CEO and President
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3400 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3400

   To suspend temporarily the duty on certain men's and boys' water 
                            resistant pants.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 6, 2006

  Mr. DeMint introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on certain men's and boys' water 
                            resistant pants.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN MEN'S AND BOYS' WATER RESISTANT PANTS.

    (a) In General.--
            (1) Chapter 61 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 
        United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence, 
        the following statistical note:
    ``7. For the purposes of subheadings 6103.43.15, 6104.63.20, and 
6113.00.90, the term `performance outerwear pants' means ankle length 
pants of water resistant synthetic fabrics, containing at least two of 
the following characteristics: side openings, sealed seams at the front 
(up to the zipper or other means of closure) and the back rise, 
insulation for cold weather protection, at least one pocket with a 
means of closure (zippered or hook and loop enclosed pockets or other 
type of enclosed pockets), scuff guards, elasticized or drawstring 
weather closure around the waist or ankles, articulated knees, or 
reinforcement in the seat or knees. The term `water resistant' means a 
garment, notwithstanding classification, that would otherwise pass the 
test for water resistance described in U.S. note 2 to chapter 62. The 
term `sealed seams' means a seam that is sealed by means of taping, 
gluing, bonding, cementing, or similar processes for the purpose of 
waterproofing the seam.''.
            (2) Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff 
        Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
        numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.61.07        Men's or boys'          Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           performance outerwear                                             31/2009          ''
                           pants described in                                                                  .
                           statistical note 7 to
                           chapter 61 (provided
                           for in subheading
                           6113.00.90)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31.1 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)

I, Todd Axelrod, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Gallery of
History, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
quarter period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.

Date:  August 11, 2006
                                   /s/ TODD AXELROD
                                   _______________________
                                   Todd Axelrod
                                   Chief Executive Office
§ 97.20 Abandonment for failure to respond within the time limit. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in § 97.104, if an applicant fails to advance actively his or her application within 30 days after the date when the last request for action was mailed to the applicant by the Office, or within such longer time as may be fixed by the Commissioner, the application shall be deemed abandoned. The filing and examination fees in such cases will not be refunded.
( b ) The submission of an amendment to the application, not responsive to the last request by the Office for action, and any proceedings relative thereto, shall not operate to save the application from abandonment.
( c ) When the applicant makes a bona fide attempt to advance the application, and is in substantial compliance with the request for action, but has inadvertently failed to comply with some procedural requirement, opportunity to comply with the procedural requirement shall be given to the applicant before the application shall be deemed abandoned. The Commissioner may set a period, not less than 30 days, to correct any deficiency in the application.
[58 FR 42435, Aug. 9, 1993, as amended at 60 FR 17189, Apr. 4, 1995; 85 FR 431, Jan. 6, 2020]
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION



I, N. Voloshin, Chief Financial Officer
of Cavitation Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



The Annual Report on Form 10K-A of the
Company for the year ended June 30, 2016 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. § 78m); and



The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: December 9, 2016 | /s/ N. VOLOSHIN                                
|---------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|                       | Name: N. VoloshinTitle: Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 2:06-cv-00674-WKW-TFM Document 7 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00674-WKW-TFM Document 7 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00674-WKW-TFM Document 7 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 3 of 3
§ 760.1307 Dairy operation payment quantity. ( a ) A dairy operation's payment quantity (the quantity of milk on which the “operation” can generate payments for “producers” involved in the operation) will be determined by FSA, based on the pounds of production of commercially marketed milk during the months of February 2009 through July 2009, multiplied by two.
( b ) The maximum payment quantity for which a dairy operation can generate payments for its dairy producers under this subpart will be 6,000,000 pounds.
( c ) The dairy operation's payment quantity will be used to determine the amount of DELAP payments made to dairy producers.
# 52.241 Utility Services Provisions and Clauses.

- 52.241-1 Electric Service Territory Compliance Representation. 
- 52.241-2 Order of Precedence-Utilities. 
- 52.241-3 Scope and Duration of Contract. 
- 52.241-4 Change in Class of Service. 
- 52.241-5 Contractor’s Facilities. 
- 52.241-6 Service Provisions. 
- 52.241-7 Change in Rates or Terms and Conditions of Service for Regulated Services. 
- 52.241-8 Change in Rates or Terms and Conditions of Service for Unregulated Services. 
- 52.241-9 Connection Charge. 
- 52.241-10 Termination Liability. 
- 52.241-11 Multiple Service Locations. 
- 52.241-12 Nonrefundable, Nonrecurring Service Charge. 
- 52.241-13 Capital Credits. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 52.2 - Text of Provisions and Clauses
Subpart 2901.0 - Scope of Subpart

Parent topic: PART 2901 - DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ACQUISITION REGULATION SYSTEM

2901.001 Scope of part.

This chapter may be referred to as the Department of Labor Acquisition Regulation or the DOLAR.

This subpart sets forth introductory information about the Department of Labor Acquisition

Regulation. This subpart explains the relationship of the DOLAR to the Federal Acquisition

Regulation (FAR) and explains the DOLAR's purpose, authority, applicability, exclusions, and

issuance.
#### § 993.72 Reports of acquisitions, sales, uses, and shipments.

Each handler shall file such reports of his acquisitions, sales, uses, and shipments of prunes, as may be requested by the committee.
634.005-6 Full production.       The Deputy Secretary is the agency head for the purposes of FAR 34.005–6 with power of redelegation to the Under Secretary for Management.    **Parent topic:** PART 634—MAJOR SYSTEM ACQUISITION
# Subparts 1419.9 - 1419.10 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**PART 1419 - SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS
§ 948.23 Handling for special purposes. Upon the basis of recommendations and information submitted by an area committee, or other available information, the Secretary, whenever he finds that it will tend to effectuate the declared purposes of the Act, shall modify, suspend, or terminate requirements in effect pursuant to §§ 948.20 to 948.22, inclusive, or §§ 948.40 or 948.77, or any combination thereof, to facilitate handling of potatoes for ( a ) Relief or charity;
( b ) Livestock feed;
( c ) Export;
( d ) Seed;
( e ) Potatoes, other than certified seed, sold to a producer exclusively for planting within specific geographic limits;
( f ) Manufacture or conversion into specified products;
( g ) Other purposes recommended by the committees and approved by the Secretary.
#### § 981.6 Shelled almonds.

*Shelled almonds* mean almonds after the shells are removed and includes any form those almonds might take. Additional almond products may be included by the Secretary from time to time upon consideration of a recommendation from the Board or other pertinent information.

[35 FR 11372, July 16, 1970, as amended at 89 FR 37968, May 7, 2024]
#### § 989.176 Records.

Each handler shall maintain complete, accurate, and current records of all of his business affairs concerning which he is required to submit reports with the Committee, and shall maintain such records for at least two years after the termination of the crop year in which the transactions occurred.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3190 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3190

 To clarify the classification of certain high-density fiberboard and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

Mr. Menendez (for himself and Mr. Lautenberg) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To clarify the classification of certain high-density fiberboard and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HIGH DENSITY FIBERBOARD.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 44 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new subheading with the article description for subheading 
4411.19.35 having the same degree of indentation as the article 
description for subheading 4411.19.30:

      

``      4411.19.35        Laminate boards or    1.9 cents/kg + 1.5%  Free (A, AU, CA,     33 cents/kg + 25%
                           panels bonded in                           CL, E, IL, J, JO,                       ''
                           whole or in part,                          MA, MX, SG)                              .
                           or impregnated,
                           with melamine or
                           other synthetic
                           resins.............

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
First Department,

June, 1969

(June 3, 1969)

#### Chase Manhattan Bank, Appellant, v. Syosset Development Corp., Respondent.

So much of the judgment entered September 6, 1968 appealed from as awards plaintiff the sum of $6,172.71, the amount found to be admittedly outstanding on the contract, is modified on the law and the facts so as to include appropriate interest on that sum, and as so modified, that part of the cause of action is severed, and the judgment granted thereon is affirmed. (CPLR 5012.) The remaining claims of plaintiff are remitted to the Justice at Trial Term, by whom the case was heard, for a further determination as to (a) the sums paid into the joint cheeking account by defendant after notice in writing of the assignment and (b) the sums diverted in favor of employees working on the so-called “professional building,” after receipt of notice by defendant of the assignment in favor of the bank, and for the entry of an appropriate judgment consistent with the facts so found, together with interest and one bill of costs and disbursements to plaintiff. Costs and disbursements on this appeal are to abide the event. Any sums paid into the joint checking account after notice' in writing to the defendant of the assignment are properly payable to plaintiff. The bank as assignee would be entitled to receive any sums paid—'not in excess of the sums so deposited — to or for the benefit of the “professional building”, but which in fact were attributed to the “ office building ”, then completed. Such payments were clearly improper. Upon the present record no computation of such sums can be made by this court, and a remand is consequently necessary. Plaintiff is patently entitled to interest on the amounts which are adjudged to be due it. However there should be only one bill of costs and disbursements on the severed judgment and the one which will be entered following a determination on the remand ordered herein. *Concur—>*Stevens, P. J., MeGivern, Nunez and McNally, JJ.; Eager, J., concurs in the result in the following memorandum: I concur in result only. Although in. my opinion there is evidence tending to support a recovery by plaintiff of moneys claimed to have been diverted from the “office building” joint account, I concur in a remission" of the matter to the trial court. This will serve the interests of justice. However, I would not limit the parties in the matter of presenting further relevant proofs having a bearing upon a right of recovery of such sums; nor would I limit the Trial Justice to a determination of particular issues or facts. Furthermore, under the circumstances, the trial justice should set forth detailed findings supporting his ultimate conclusions.