alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 993.58 Deferment of time for withholding. ( a ) Compliance by any handler with the requirement of § 993.57 for withholding reserve prunes may be temporarily deferred to any date desired by the handler, but not later than November 15 of the crop year, upon the execution and delivery by such handler to the committee of a written undertaking that on or prior to the desired date he will have fully satisfied his holding requirement. Such undertaking shall be secured by a bond or bonds to be filed with and acceptable to the committee in the amount or amounts specified, conditioned upon full compliance with such undertaking.
( b ) ( 1 ) Each bond shall be provided by and at the handler's expense, with a surety or sureties acceptable to the committee, and shall be in an amount computed by multiplying the pounds of natural condition prunes for which deferment is desired by the bonding rate. Such bonding rate shall be established by the committee at a level sufficient to achieve the objectives of this part.
( 2 ) In case a handler defaults in meeting his deferred withholding requirement, any funds collected by the committee from the bonding company through such default shall be used by the committee to purchase from handlers a quantity of natural condition prunes, up to but not exceeding the quantity on which default occurred. Purchases shall be made from prunes with respect to which the reserve obligation has been met, and shall be of grades, varieties, or sizes and in such containers as the committee specifies in consideration of available reserve prune outlets. Purchases shall be at prices determined to be appropriate by the committee and if more prunes are offered than required by the committee, it shall make the purchases from various handlers as nearly as practicable in proportion to the quantity of their respective offerings at the same price. The committee shall dispose of the prunes acquired as soon as practicable in the most favorable reserve prune outlets and shall deposit the proceeds from such sales, less committee expenses in connection with such transaction, with reserve pool funds for distribution to equity holders.
( 3 ) If for any reason the committee is unable to purchase a quantity of prunes as large as the quantity of reserve prunes in default by the handler, any remaining balance of funds received because of the default less expenses of the committee, shall be deposited with reserve pool funds for distribution to equity holders.
( c ) A handler who has defaulted on his bond shall be credited on his reserve obligation with, and his holding requirement reduced by, that quantity of prunes represented by the sums collected but not more than the extent of his default.
2944.302 Requirements.       The authority of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management under FAR 44.302(a), to raise or lower the $25 million review level for a contractor's purchasing system, may not be delegated. When a contractor's purchasing system review is required by the contracting officer, the effort must be coordinated with the OASAM Business Operations Center's Division of Acquisition Management Services and the Division of Cost Determination.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2944.3 - Contractors' Purchasing Systems Reviews
Subpart 1337.1 - Service Contracts - General    **Parent topic:** PART 1337 - SERVICE CONTRACTING1337.110 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.1337.110-70 Personnel security processing requirements.       (a) CAM 1337.70 establishes procedures for personnel security processing for contractors performing services on or within a Department of Commerce facility or through an information technology (IT) system, as required by the Department of Commerce *Security Manual* and Department of Commerce *Security Program Policy and Minimum Implementation Standards.*          (b) Insert clause 1352.237-70, *Security Processing Requirements - High or Moderate Risk Contracts,* in all service contracts designated as High or Moderate risk that will be performed on a DOC facility or when the contractor will access a DOC IT system.          (c) Insert clause 1352.237-71, *Security Processing Requirements - Low Risk Contracts,* in all service contracts designated as Low Risk that will be performed on or within a Department of Commerce facility or when the contractor will access a DOC IT system.          (d) Insert clause 1352.237-72, *Security Processing Requirements - National Security Contracts,* in all service contracts designated as National Security Contracts that will be performed on or within a Department of Commerce facility or when the contractor will access a DOC IT system.          (e) Insert clause 1352.237-73, *Foreign National Visitor and Guest Access to Departmental Resources,* in all DOC solicitations and contracts for services where foreign national access to any DOC facility or DOC IT system is required. The language of the clause may only be modified by adding more restrictive agency or operating unit counsel-specific guidance.1337.110-71 Additional DOC clauses related to service contracting.       (a) Insert a clause substantially similar to 1352.237-74, *Progress Reports,* where progress reports are required in order to make periodic payments based upon contract progress made, or if the contracting officer otherwise determines that progress reports are needed.          (b) Insert a clause substantially similar to 1352.237-75, *Key Personnel,* when contract performance requires identification of contractor key personnel.
#### In re SCHROEDER.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 25, 1906.)

In the matter of Carrie B. Schroeder, etc.

No opinion. Motion granted and question certified. Order filed.
Subpart 1520.3 - Labor Surplus Area

Subcontracting Program [Reserved]

Parent topic: PART 1520 - LABOR SURPLUS AREA CONCERNS
17.000 Definitions.

Bridge Contract is a short-term sole-source contract awarded generally to the incumbent contractor

to continue critical services when a follow-on competitive contract action could not be completed in

a timely manner. It provides needed services until the program and contracting offices can establish

a new competitive contract. The SPE Bridge Decision Briefing, located in DARS PGI 17.000, is not

required for non-DISA contract actions nor is it required for bridge contracts made necessary by

GAO or Agency-level protests. Although a bridge may not require a decision brief, it still must be

added onto the Bridge Report .

Parent topic: PART 17 –– SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS
5605.403 Requests from Members of

Congress

The release of information must be coordinated with SOF AT&L-KM/KX/KB as appropriate.

HQ, United States Special Operations Command

Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L)

SOFARS 5605

February 2007

Parent topic: Subpart 5605.4 - RELEASE OF INFORMATION
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Authority:

7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 868.8 Complaints and reports of alleged violations.

(a) *General.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, complaints and reports of violations involving the Act or the regulations, standards, and instructions issued under the Act should be filed with the Service in accordance with 7 CFR 1.133 of the regulations of the Office of the Secretary of Agriculture and these regulations and the instructions.

(b) *Retest inspection and appeal inspection service.* Complaints involving the results of inspection services shall, to the extent practicable, be submitted as requests for retest inspection, appeal inspection, or Board appeal inspection services as set forth in these regulations.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0580-0011)
Subpart 939.70 - Implementing DOE Policies

and Procedures

Parent topic: PART 939 - ACQUISITION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

939.7000 Scope.

This part sets forth the policies and procedures that apply to the acquisition of information

technology by the Department of Energy (DOE).

939.7001 [Reserved]

939.7002 Contractor acquisition of information technology.

(a) Management and operating (M&O) contracts. Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section,

M&O contractors and their subcontractors shall not be used to acquire information technology

unrelated to the mission of the M&O contract either for sole use by DOE employees or employees of

other DOE contractors, or for use by other Federal agencies or their contractors.

(b) Other than M&O contracts. Where it has been determined that a contractor (other than an M&O

contractor or its subcontractor) will acquire information technology either for sole use by DOE

employees or for the furnishing of the information technology as government-furnished property

under another contract, and after receiving written authorization from their cognizant DOE

contracting office pursuant to 48 CFR part 51, DOE contractors working under cost-reimbursementtype contracts may place orders against authorized contracts. All authorizations to contractors shall

expressly and specifically reference the restriction regarding contractor use of the items acquired,

cited at 951.102(e)(4)(iii).

(c) Consolidated contractor acquisitions. When common information technology requirements in

support of DOE programs have been identified and it is anticipated that the consolidation of such

requirements will promote cost or other efficiencies, the Designated Senior Official for Information

Management may authorize an M&O contractor to acquire information technology for use by the

following -

(1) One or more other contractor(s) performing on-site at the same DOE-owned or -leased facility as

the M&O contractor; or

(2) Other M&O contractors.
#### § 925.23 Selection.

The Secretary shall select members and alternate members of the committee from persons nominated pursuant to § 925.22 or from other qualified persons.
#### In the Matter of Dominick Giaquinto, Appellant, v Commissioner of New York State Department of Health, Respondent, et al., Respondent.

Submitted August 27, 2007;

decided October 23, 2007

Reported below, 39 AD3d 922.

Motion by the National Center for Law and Economic Justice, Inc. for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the motion for leave to appeal herein granted and the brief is accepted as filed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-0736-WKW

) (WO)

SEVENTY FOUR THOUSAND SEVEN )

HUNDRED ($74,700) DOLLARS IN )

UNITED STATES CURRENCY, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

Claimant George E. Jones filed a motion to suppress certain evidence and statements

arising out of his arrest, search of his residence, and subsequent interrogation on or about March 31,

2006, in Montgomery, Alabama. (Doc. # 15.) Claimant generally alleges that the search of his

person and his residence were violative of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution;

that the fruit of the alleged unlawful arrest and interrogation is due to be suppressed; that the search

warrants in question were issued on less than probable cause; that the search warrant for claimant’s

residence was vague and overbroad; and that the search warrant failed to adequately describe the

premises to be searched and the things to be seized.

The court held a hearing on the motion to suppress on September 6, 2007. At the hearing the

government introduced pictures of items recovered during the search, the warrants, and the

testimony of participating officers. Claimant offered no evidence, and he failed to challenge in any

way the probable cause determination for either warrant. Moreover, claimant did not offer or

identify evidence in support of his contentions that the warrants were vague, overbroad, or lacking

in sufficient descriptiveness. 

Case 2:06-cv-00736-WKW-SRW Document 28 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

Based upon the evidence presented at the hearing, the court finds probable cause existed for

the warrants; that the warrants were not overbroad, vague, or lacking in descriptiveness; and that the

results of the search, including statements following arrest of the claimant, are not due to be

suppressed. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Motion to Suppress (Doc. # 15) is DENIED.

The government has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the

property is subject to forfeiture. 18 U.S.C. § 983(c)(1). The matter is set for trial on October 15,

2007. After completion of the trial, the court will issue a memorandum opinion detailing and

analyzing all relevant facts under the § 983 evidentiary standard.

DONE this 28th day of September, 2007.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00736-WKW-SRW Document 28 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 2 of 2
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

D&S CONSULTANTS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

UNITED STATES, 

Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

CACI-ISS, INC., 

Defendant, 

and 

HP ENTERPRISE SERVICES, LLC., 

Defendant. 

____________________ 

2012-5031 

______________________

 

 Appeal from the United States Court of Federal 

Claims in Case No. 11-CV-446, Judge George W. Miller. 

______________________ 

JUDGMENT 

______________________ 
ANTHONY H. ANIKEEFF, Williams Mullen, PC, of 

McLean, Virginia, argued for plaintiff-appellant. 

CHRISTOPHER L. KRAFCHEK, Trial Attorney, 

Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United 

States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued 

for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were 

STUART F. DELERY, Acting Assistant Attorney General, 

JEANNE E. DAVIDSON, Director, and KIRK T. MANHARDT, 

Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief was VINCENT 

BUONOCORE, Deputy Assistant General Counsel, Office of 

the General Counsel, United States Department of 

Veterans Affairs, of Eatontown, New Jersey. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (PROST, MAYER, and MOORE, Circuit 

Judges). 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 October 9, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

 Date Jan Horbaly 

 Clerk
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the amended Annual Report of Buckingham Exploration Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended May 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated: February 17, 2011







By: /s/ Christopher Robin Relph


Christopher Robin Relph


Chief Executive Officer and


Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

Mr
. J. R. Stroble Director, National TRU Program Carlsbad Field Office Department of Energy P.O
. Box 3090 Carlsbad, NM 88221 Dear Mr. Stroble: 

## JUL 1 7 2013 OFF ICE OF AIR AND RADIATION

We received your letter dated July 17, 2013, requesting the U.S
. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA ' s) concurrence on the draft expansion memo and attachments which the Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) plans to issue to the U.S. Department of Energy's Idaho Office. The Idaho Treatment Group is responsible for characterizing contact-handled (CH) transuranic (TRU) waste at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) in Idaho. We concur with the draft expansion memo to add the pre1980 INL-Exhumed S u bsurface Disposal Area (SDA) waste to the AMWTP's TRU waste characterization program. In accordance wit h EPA regulations at 40 CFR 194.8 (69 FR 42571

-42583), on October 3 , 2006, EPA approved AMWTP's CH TRU waste characterization program (See EPA Air Docket No. A-98-49, II-A4-66). Earlier this month we approved the SDA waste. Thank you for providin g us with an opportunity to review the draft expansion memo for AMWTP. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at 202-343-9462 or Ed Feltcorn at 202-343-9422.

cc: (Electronic Distribution) Joe Franco, CB FO Norma Castaneda, CBFO NTP Marcus Pinzel, CBFO NTP Tom Morgan, CBFO NTP Trais Kliphuis, NMED 

### Sit e Documents, CBFO Jon Edwards , EPA Tom Peake, EPA Raymond Lee, EPA Sincerely,

Rajani Joglekar Center for Waste Management and Regulations

l ntemet Address (URL) • http ://www
. epa.gov Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Ch lorine Free Recycled Paper
###### Editorial Note on Part 982

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 61 FR 17559, Apr. 22, 1996.

#### § 982.2 Act.

*Act* means Public Act No. 10, 73d Congress, as amended and as reenacted and amended by the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601 *et seq.;* 48 Stat. 31, as amended).
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3578 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3578

  To reduce temporarily the duty on certain footwear not covering the 
            ankle with coated or laminated textile fabrics.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 27, 2006

  Mr. Carper introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To reduce temporarily the duty on certain footwear not covering the 
            ankle with coated or laminated textile fabrics.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN FOOTWEAR NOT COVERING THE ANKLE WITH COATED OR 
              LAMINATED TEXTILE FABRICS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.64.10      Men's footwear,     20%          No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         except vulcanized                                                  31/2009
                         footwear and
                         footwear with
                         waterproof molded
                         bottoms,
                         including bottoms
                         comprising an
                         outer sole and
                         all or part of
                         the upper, valued
                         over $20/pair,
                         not covering the
                         ankle, designed
                         to be worn in
                         lieu of, but not
                         over, other
                         footwear as a
                         protection
                         against water,
                         oil, grease or
                         chemicals or cold
                         or inclement
                         weather where
                         such protection
                         includes
                         protection
                         against water
                         that is imparted
                         by the use of a
                         coated or
                         laminated textile
                         fabric (provided
                         in subheading
                         6404.19.20)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 110 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 110

 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Education and 
            the Workforce in the One Hundred Ninth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 16, 2005

Mr. Boehner (for himself and Mr. George Miller of California) submitted 
the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Education and 
            the Workforce in the One Hundred Ninth Congress.

    Resolved, 

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on Education and the Workforce 
(hereafter in this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), 
including the expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out 
of the applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for 
committee salaries and expenses, not more than $15,493,286 for the One 
Hundred Ninth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $7,708,622 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2005, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2006; and
            (2) not more than $7,784,664 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2006, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2007.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 966.14 Varieties.

*Varieties* means and includes all classifications or subdivisions of tomatoes according to those definitive characteristics now or hereafter recognized by the United States Department of Agriculture.
PART 707—ACQUISITION PLANNING

Subpart 707.1—Acquisition Plans

707.104 General procedures.

Parent topic: SUBCHAPTER B—ACQUISITION PLANNING

Subpart 707.1—Acquisition Plans

707.104 General procedures.

Policies, procedures, and internal guidance for acquisition planning are found in ADS 300.
# Subpart 1408.1 - Excess Personal Property

**Parent topic:**PART 1408 - REQUIRED SOURCES OF SUPPLIES AND SERVICES

## 1408.102 Policy.

Inquiries on available excess or surplus personal property should be directed to the PMO or the designee in each Bureau or Office.