alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5                      
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                               1,469 
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       28,248
<ALLOWANCES>                                           430
<INVENTORY>                                         56,229
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    92,134
<PP&E>                                             137,148
<DEPRECIATION>                                      47,229
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     183,275
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               36,989
<BONDS>                                             52,402
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               142
<OTHER-SE>                                          89,609
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       183,275
<SALES>                                            106,729
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   107,104
<CGS>                                               92,369
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       92,369
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   3,569
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (7,575)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        (2,974)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (4,601)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       (125)
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (4,726)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.33)
                                             


</TABLE>
#### Broadhurst, guardian, *v.*Hill *et al.*

Fish, C. J.

1. The instructions excepted to were not erroneous for any reason assigned.

2. The matter of the written request to instruct the jury was fully covered in the charge given, not only in stating in the abstract the legal principle involved, but also in a full and clear application of the legal principle to the evidence in the case.

*212July 15, 1913.

Equitable petition. Before Judge Littlejohn. Sumter superior court. July 15, 1912.

*B. L. Maynard,*for plaintiff. *Ellis, Webb & Ellis, W. P. Wallis, E. A. HawMns/stná J. B. Hudson,*for defendants.

3. In accordance with numerous decisions of this court, the refusal of an oral request to instruct the jury is not cause for the grant of a new trial.

4. The alleged newly discovered evidence was cumulative and impeaching in its character,' and moreover would not likely produce a different result on another trial.

5. There was evidence to authorize the verdict, and the court did not err in refusing a new trial. *Judgment affirmed,. All the Justices concur.*
#### In the Matter of Durand G., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[813 NYS2d 905]

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Alma Cordova, J.), entered on or about March 14, 2005, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the acts of attempted assault in the second degree, obstructing governmental administration in the second degree and menacing in the third degree, and placed him on probation for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning credibility *(see People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84 [1903]). The teacher-victim’s testimony established the required elements of all three *392counts. We have considered and rejected appellant’s remaining contentions. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Marlow, Sullivan, Gonzalez and Malone, JJ.
#### § 986.79 Verification of reports.

For the purpose of verifying and checking reports filed by handlers on their operations, the Secretary and the Council, through their duly authorized representatives, shall have access to any premises where pecans and pecan records are held. Such access shall be available at any time during reasonable business hours. Authorized representatives of the Council or the Secretary shall be permitted to inspect any pecans held and any and all records of the handler with respect to matters within the purview of this part. Each handler shall maintain complete records on the receiving, holding, and disposition of all pecans. Each handler shall furnish all labor necessary to facilitate such inspections at no expense to the Council or the Secretary. Each handler shall store all pecans held by him in such manner as to facilitate inspection and shall maintain adequate storage records which will permit accurate identification with respect to inspection certificates of respective lots and of all such pecans held or disposed of theretofore. The Council, with the approval of the Secretary, may establish any methods and procedures needed to verify reports.
-1-

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

ELIZABETH LYNNE HUTCHINSON, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO:

vs. ) CV-06-00700-WHA

) JURY DEMAND

)

PHENIX CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION, )

LARRY E. DICHIARA, officially as )

as Superintendent of the Phenix City Schools )

)

)

Defendants. )

PLAINTIFF’S SUPPLEMENTAL EXHIBIT LIST

COMES NOW, Plaintiff Elizabeth Hutchinson, and lists the following additional

exhibits that may be used at the trial of this action which were not included in the original

Exhibit List (Doc. #40). Plaintiff hereby incorporates by reference Plaintiff’s Exhibit List (Doc.

#40) and adds the following additional documents:

34. Betty Cliatt Performance Evaluation April 25, 2005

35. Betty Cliatt Performance Evaluation April 25, 2003

36. Betty Cliatt Performance Evaluation March 1, 1999

37. Betty Cliatt Transfer Agreement and Recommendation May 3, 2006

38. Betty Cliatt Transfer acceptance May 3, 2006

39. Hand-written Note regarding Betty Cliatt (2 pages)

40. Hand-written Note to Mr. Taff regarding Betty Cliatt (2 pages)

Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 42 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 1 of 3
-2-

41. Hand-written Note to Betty Cliatt regarding Evaluations (2 pages)

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Joshua D. Wilson

Rocco Calamusa, Jr.

Joshua D. Wilson

Attorneys for the Plaintiff

OF COUNSEL

WIGGINS, CHILDS, QUINN & PANTAZIS, LLC

The Kress Building

301 19

th Street North

Birmingham, Alabama 35203

(205) 314-0500

Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 42 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 2 of 3
-3-

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I do hereby certify that on this the 3

rd

day of July , 2007, I electronically filed the

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of

such filing to the following:

Sidney S. Smith

Smith & Smith, PC

1503 Broad Street

Phenix City, AL 36867

/s/ Joshua D. Wilson

OF COUNSEL

Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 42 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 3 of 3
P. 1


# OAR Box 

# 1875 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 11 ) ll-E-2 9 Docket Number: 

# A-90-1 9

Printed 12/1/200811:12:44

AM Sheet 11 of 86P. 2 

## A-90-1 9 ll-E-2 9

• tU S r, , 

# 15SB . '• •ooo"- " UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y Offic e o f Ai rQualit yPlannin g an d Standard s ...... . Researc h Triangl e Park
. Nort h Carolin a 2771 1 ; 7? ~\y % \\ v Januar y 14 , 199 2 ; i 

## UE

C 

## \ 8 «H
MEMORANDU

M SUBJECT : Tri p t o Do w Chemica l (HO

N an d FROM : TO : Bruc e C . Jordan , Di r

EmissionStandard s D Th e File s O nDecembe r 16 , 199 1 Bil l Rosenber g an d I visite

d th e Do w Chemica l Plan t a t Midland , Michigan . Th e purpos e of th e meeting wa s t o se e firs t han d th e operation s o f a majo r chemica l compan y an d t o understan

d th e tas k face

d b y the chemica l industr y i n complyin

g wit henvironmenta l regulations . Th e meetin

g consiste

d o f a discussiono f Do w representative s of th e progra

m underwa

y t o improv

e environmenta l performance . A tou r of th e environmenta l contro l technolog y researchla

bwa s provided . Also , a driv e throug

ho f a majo r chemica l plant wa s provide d i norde r t o physically observe variou s operations . cc : Early

ReductionDocke t HO N Docke t
§ 959.24 Districts. To determine a basis for selecting Committee members, the following districts of the production area are hereby established: ( a ) *District No. 1.* (Coastal Bend-Lower Valley) The Counties of Victoria, Calhoun, Goliad, Refugio, Bee, Live Oak, San Patricio, Aransas, Jim Wells, Nueces, Kleberg, Brooks, Kenedy, Duval, McMullen, Cameron, Hidalgo, Starr, and Willacy in the State of Texas.
( b ) *District No. 2.* (Laredo-Winter Garden) The Counties of Zapata, Webb, Jim Hogg, DeWitt, Wilson, Atascosa, Karnes Val Verde, Frio, Kinney, Uvalde, Medina, Maverick, Zavala, Dimmit, and La Salle in the State of Texas.
[84 FR 10667, Mar. 22, 2019, as amended at 88 FR 82234, Nov. 24, 2023]
#### J. F. Braun *&*Sons, Respondent, v. First National City Bank of New York, Appellant.

Order entered July 8, 1968, unanimously modified on the law, to grant summary judgment dismissing the first cause of action, without costs or disbursements; otherwise affirmed. Plaintiff, a customer of defendant bank, has sued for damage resulting from certain transactions in respect of plaintiff’s account and those of two other customers. All three had so-called no-delay privileges, i.e., deposits were forthwith credited to their accounts without awaiting collection. The bank, discovering that the two customers other than plaintiff were engaging in exchange of checks to inflate their balances, placed an embargo on payment of checks drawn on these accounts, deposits thereto being promptly credited. Plaintiff had drawn checks in large amounts to one of the kiting customers, which were charged against plaintiff’s account and credited to the depositor; meanwhile checks taken in exchange were dishonored. The balance then remaining in the account on which the bad checks were drawn was used by defendant to liquidate loans. Plaintiff’s account was thereby depleted and, because of their insolvency, plaintiff was unable to recoup from the other two customers. The first cause of action charges that defendant, with knowledge of kiting by the others, should not have extended no-delay privileges to them, which enabled them to make false representations to plaintiff by reason of which plaintiff was damaged. There is no such duty, nor is there any indication that plaintiff, in engaging in the exchange transaction, relied on the bank’s conduct. Actually, these allegations provide background for the second cause and constitute a splitoff of a portion of the second cause. Summary judgment should have been granted dismissing the first cause. The second cause, however, alleges that, with knowledge of the kiting situation, and of the bad financial position of the others,, and of their practices, and in bad faith, defendant manipulated all three accounts so as to appropriate to itself the sums lost by plaintiff. Whatever may be a 'bank’s right to recover its losses from one customer at the expense of another, it must do so in good faith (see *Hydrocarbon Proc*
      *750
      *essing Corp.*v. *Chemical Bank N.*Y. *Trust Co.,*16 N Y 2d 147). A valid cause is stated, and an issue exists at least as to the time at which the bank learned of its customers’ machinations, and acted upon that knowledge. Concur—■ Stevens, P. J., Capozzoli, Tilzer, Markewich and Nunez, JJ.
Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 25 Filed 11/28/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 25 Filed 11/28/2006 Page 2 of 2
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

CAMELLIA THERAPEUTIC )

FOSTER AGENCY, LLC, etc., )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv735-MHT

)

THE ALABAMA DEPARTMENT )

OF HUMAN RESOURCES, )

)

Defendant. ) 

ORDER

Because defendants Bob Riley, Page Walley, and Susan

Ward have been dismissed, it is ORDERED that their motion

to dismiss (doc. no. 2) is denied as moot.

DONE, this the 26th day of September, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00735-MHT-CSC Document 11 Filed 09/26/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### In re RIFKIND.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

December 11, 1914.)

In the matter of Albert J. Rifkind.

No opinion. Referred to Hon. H. A. .Gildersleeve, official referee. Settle order on notice.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of First Community Financial Corporation (the Company) for the period ended
September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Richard R. Leitzel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the
operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                           |  |                                                              
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  |  | 
|Date: November 10, 2005 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    RICHARD R.
LEITZEL
|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                           |  | Richard R. Leitzel, Vice President andChief Financial Officer



19
1501.603-1 General.

EPA Contracting Officers shall be selected and appointed and their appointments terminated in

accordance with the Contracting Officer warrant program specified in EPA Acquisition Guide

(EPAAG) subsection 1.6.4.

Parent topic: Subpart 1501.6 - Contracting Authority and Responsibilities
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3247 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3247

              To reduce temporarily the duty on M-Alcohol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 26, 2006

Mr. Frist (for Mrs. Dole) introduced the following bill; which was read 
             twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
              To reduce temporarily the duty on M-Alcohol.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. M-ALCOHOL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.11.16        2-(2,4-Dichlorophenyl)- 1%        No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           3-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-                                            31/2009          ''
                           yl)propanol (CAS No.                                                                .
                           112281-82-0)
                           (provided for in
                           subheading
                           2933.99.82)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 984.72 Reports of walnuts handled.

Each handler who handles walnuts, inshell or shelled, at any time during a marketing year shall submit to the Board in such form and at such intervals as the Board may prescribe, reports showing the quantity so handled and such other information pertinent thereto as the Board may specify.

[88 FR 56750, Aug. 21, 2023]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3391 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3391

  To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain drawback 
                                claims.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 6, 2006

  Mr. Vitter introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain drawback 
                                claims.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIQUIDATION OR RELIQUIDATION OF CERTAIN DRAWBACK CLAIMS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act of 
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other provision of law, the Bureau of 
Customs and Border Protection shall, not later than 90 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, liquidate or reliquidate the 
drawback claims, as filed, that are described in subsection (c).
    (b) Payment of Amounts Due.--Any amounts due pursuant to the 
liquidation or reliquidation of the claims described in subsection (c) 
shall be paid not later than 90 days after the date of such liquidation 
or reliquidation.
    (c) Drawback Claims.--The drawback claims referred to in subsection 
(a) are the following:

 
                   Drawback claim number                     Filing date
 
AA6-0303556-6                                                  12/02/97
AA6-0313128-2                                                  10/10/02
 

                                 <all>
```
Case 2:06-cv-00719-WKW-WC Document 23 Filed 12/03/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00719-WKW-WC Document 23 Filed 12/03/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00719-WKW-WC Document 23-2 Filed 12/03/2007 Page 1 of 1
US
Bank(logo)







| | Global
                           Corporate Trust
        
        190
        S. LaSalle Street, 7th Floor
        
        MK-IL-SL7C
        
        Chicago,
        IL 60603
        
        usbank.com
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Annual
Statement of Compliance

GS
Mortgage Securities Trust 2012-GCJ9



VIA
EMAIL



GS
Mortgage Securities Corporation II

200
West Street



New
York, New York 10282-2198



Attention:
Leah Nivison



leah.nivison@gs.com



Re:
	GS Mortgage Securities Trust 2012-GCJ9, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2012-GCJ9 (the
“Trust”), issued pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2012 (the
“Agreement”), by and among GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, as depositor, U.S. Bank National Association,
as certificate administrator (the “Certificate Administrator”) and trustee, Pentalpha Surveillance, LLC, as
operating advisor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as master servicer, and Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special
servicer.



I,
Kimberly O. Jacobs, a Senior Vice President of U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator, hereby certify that:



(1)
A review of the activities of the Certificate Administrator during the preceding calendar year (the “Reporting Period”)
and of the performance of the Certificate Administrator under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and



(2)
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Certificate Administrator has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement
in all material respects throughout such Reporting Period.



Capitalized
terms used but not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.



Date:
February 28, 2022



| | U.S.
    Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                 
| | By:                                                             
| |                                                                 
| |
EX-10.15



 Exhibit 10.15 

Non-Employee Director Compensation Summary Sheet 

 

					
	 Annual Retainer
	  	$	39,655	 


					
		
	 Type of Meeting
	  	Amount Paid per Meeting	 
	 Board Meeting
	  	$	3,965	 
	 Special Meeting
	  	$	3,965	 
	 Telephonic Board Meeting
	  	$	1,130	 
	 Compensation & Nominating Committee Meeting
	  	$	1,700	 
	 Audit Committee Meeting
	  	$	3,400	 
	 Executive Committee Meeting
	  	$	3,965	 
	 Additional Fee for Chairperson (except Audit)
	  	$	1,700	 
	 Additional Fee for Audit Committee Chairperson
	  	$	2,265	 
		
	 Type of Meeting
	  	Amount Paid per Hour	 
	 Investment Oversight Committee - In Person Meeting
	  	$	1,000	 
	 Investment Oversight Committee - Telephonic Meeting
	  	$	750