alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1021.315 Records of decision. ( a ) No decision may be made on a proposal covered by an EIS during a 30-day “waiting period” following completion of the final EIS, except as provided at 40 CFR 1506.1 and 1506.10(b) and § 1021.211 of this part. The 30-day period starts when the EPA Notice of Availability for the final EIS is published in the Federal Register.
( b ) If DOE decides to take action on a proposal covered by an EIS, a ROD shall be prepared as provided at 40 CFR 1505.2 (except as provided at 40 CFR 1506.1 and § 1021.211 of this part).
( c ) DOE RODs shall be published in the Federal Register and made available to the public as specified in 40 CFR 1506.6, except as provided in 40 CFR 1507.3(c) and § 1021.340 of this part.
( d ) No action shall be taken until the decision has been made public. DOE may implement the decision before the ROD is published in the Federal Register if the ROD has been signed and the decision and the availability of the ROD have been made public by other means (e.g., press release, announcement in local media).
( e ) DOE may revise a ROD at any time, so long as the revised decision is adequately supported by an existing EIS. A revised ROD is subject to the provisions of paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this section.
[57 FR 15144, Apr. 24, 1992, as amended at 61 FR 36239, July 9, 1996]
§ 110.7 Information collection requirements: OMB approval. ( a ) The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has submitted the information collection requirements contained in this part to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.*). The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has approved the information collection requirements contained in this part under control numbers 3150-0036.
( b ) The approved information requirements contained in this part appear in §§ 110.7a, 110.10, 110.27, 110.32, 110.50, 110.52, 110.53, and 110.54.
( c ) This part contains information collection requirements in addition to those approved under the control number specified in paragraph (a) of this section. The information collection requirements contained in §§ 110.19, 110.20, 110.21, 110.22, 110.23, 110.31, 110.32, and 110.51, and NRC Form 7 are approved under control number 3150-0027.
[62 FR 52190, Oct. 6, 1997, as amended at 65 FR 70290, Nov. 22, 2000; 67 FR 67101, Nov. 4, 2002; 71 FR 19104, Apr. 13, 2006; 75 FR 44087, July 28, 2010; 76 FR 72087, Nov. 22, 2011; 85 FR 65664, Oct. 16, 2020]
#### COHEN, Appellant, v. COHEN, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 5, 1914.)

Action by Louis Cohen against Rebecca Cohen.

H. Greenberg, of New York City, for appellant.

S. Wechsler, of New York City, for respondent.

No opinion. Order modified, as stated in order, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs. Order filed. See, also, 160 App. Div. 240, 145 N. Y. Supp. 652.
#### James *v.*Hill *et al.*

Lumpkin, J.

1. Where the heirs of a grantor, with the consent of his administrator, brought suit against his grantee and persons holding by purchase under such grantee, for the purpose of cancelling the conveyances and recovering the land conveyed, on the ground that their ancestor was insane and lacking in mental capacity to make a deed, and that the defendants had notice thereof; and where it appeared that the' deed was made by him in January, 1896, that he died in April, 1897, and that the defendants had been in possession since that time, and the suit was not brought, until 1910, and no reason appeared why the plaintiffs did not know, or by the slightest diligence could not have known, of the substantial facts, so as to bring the suit within a reasonable time after the deed was executed and after the grantor’s death, the action was properly dismissed on demurrer on the ground that it was stale and that the plaintiffs were in laches. *Bennett*v. *Bird,*139 *Ga.*25 (76 S. E. 568); *Spence*v. *Queen,*139 *Ga.*587 (77 S. E. 820); *Bailey*v. *Freeman,*140 *Ga.*71 (78 S. E. 423).

2. The allegations in the petition and the amendments by which it was sought to show that the heirs, with the consent of the administrator, brought suit within a reasonable time, were not sufficient for that purpose. The administrator of the decedent, as clerk of the superior court, recorded the deed shortly after it was executed. One of the plaintiffs was a witness to it. The allegations in regard to the lack of knowledge on the part of other plaintiffs were insufficient to save the case, when considered in the light of the fact that they must have known that the defendants were in possession of the land and receiving the rents and profits thereof, and must have known of their father’s *740mental condition, and in view of the fact that the deed from him was recorded in 1896.

October 15, 1913.

Equitable petition. Before Judge Edwards. Douglas superior court. September 6, 1912.

*J. 8. James,*for plaintiff. *W. T. Roberts, J. R. Hutcheson,*and *E. 8. Lumpkin,*for defendants.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
§ 1303.106 Responsibility, form, and content of responses. The Board's Executive Director of his/her designated FOIA Officer is authorized to grant or deny any request for a record and determine appropriate fees. When determining which records are responsive to a request, the Board will include only records in its possession as of the date of the search. ( a ) If no records are responsive to the request, the FOIA Officer will notify the requestor in writing.
( b ) When a FOIA Officer denies a request in whole or in part he/she will notify the requestor in writing. The response will be signed by the FOIA Officer and will include: ( 1 ) The name and title or position of the person making the denial;
( 2 ) A brief statement of the reasons for the denial, including the FOIA exemption(s) that the FOIA Officer has relied on the denying the request; and
( 3 ) A statement that the denial may be appealed under § 1303.114 and a description of the requirements of that section.
( c ) *Consultations and referrals.* When a request for a record not produced by the Board is received, the Board shall refer the requestor to the issuing agency in writing. The Board may hold records that contain or refer to non-public information obtained from other federal agencies (co-mingled records). If those co-mingled records are requested, the Board shall determine whether the portion of those records produced by the Board can be released. Before any portion of a co-mingled record is released, the Board shall redact the non-public information obtained from other federal agencies. The Board shall inform the requestor of the reason for the redaction and shall refer the requestor to the issuing agency in writing.
( d ) *Notice of referral.* When the Board refers all or part of a request to another agency, it shall give the requestor the address of the agency contact and the section(s) referred.
( e ) *Timing of responses to requests sent to other agencies.* The Board shall provide, within the FOIA deadline, responses only to those parts of the request not referred. Requests will be referred to other agencies and the requestor notified as soon as it is determined that a referral is appropriate.
( f ) *Agreements on consultations and referrals.* The Board may make agreements with other agencies to eliminate the need for consultations or referrals for particular types of records.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 126 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         March 2, 2005.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 27) to enhance the workforce investment system of the Nation by 
strengthening one-stop career centers, providing for more effective governance 
arrangements, promoting access to a more comprehensive array of employment, 
training, and related services, establishing a targeted approach to serving 
youth, and improving performance accountability, and for other purposes. The 
first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be 
confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Education and the Workforce. After general debate the bill shall be considered 
for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be in order to consider as an 
original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the 
amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on 
Education and the Workforce now printed in the bill. The committee amendment in 
the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. No amendment to the 
committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be in order except those 
printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. 
Each such amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the report, may 
be offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as 
read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided 
and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to 
amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question in 
the House or in the Committee of the Whole. All points of order against such 
amendments are waived. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for 
amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with such 
amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in 
the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or 
to the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question 
shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final 
passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Docket Number FAA-2013-0329
#### In the Matter of Thomas J. Valentine, Appellant, v. Marie Merola et al., and Board of Elections of Westchester County, Respondents.

In a proceeding to invalidate petitions designating respondents Merola and Phillips as candidates in the Republican Party Primary Election to be held June 17, 1969 for the Party position of member of the Westchester Republican County Committee from the 8th Election District of the 1st Ward of the City of New Rochelle, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered June 10, 1969, which dismissed the petition in the proceeding. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Beldoek, P. J., Christ, Rabin, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 16 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 1 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 16 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 2 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 16 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 3 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 16 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 4 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 16 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 5 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 16 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 6 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 16 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 7 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 16-2 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 1 of 1
52.222-31 Construction Wage Rate Requirements-Price Adjustment (Percentage Method).       As prescribed in 22.407(f), insert the following clause:          Construction Wage Rate Requirements-Price Adjustment (Percentage Method) (Aug 2018)                                       (a) 						            The wage determination issued under the Construction Wage Rate Requirements statute by the Administrator, Wage and Hour Division, U.S. Department of Labor, that is effective for an option to extend the term of the contract, will apply to that option period.                                          (b) 						            The Contracting Officer will adjust the portion of the contract price or contract unit price(s) containing the labor costs subject to the Construction Wage Rate Requirements statute to provide for an increase in wages and fringe benefits at the exercise of each option to extend the term of the contract in accordance with the following procedures:                                                         (1) 								                The Contracting Officer has determined that the portion of the contract price or contract unit price(s) containing labor costs subject to the Construction Wage Rate Requirements statute is __________ [*Contracting Officer insert percentage rate*] percent.                                                            (2) 								                The Contracting Officer will increase the portion of the contract price or contract unit price(s) containing the labor costs subject to the Construction Wage Rate Requirements statute by the percentage rate published in _____________ [*Contracting Officer insert publication*].                                                                             (c) 						            The Contracting Officer will make the price adjustment at the exercise of each option to extend the term of the contract. This adjustment is the only adjustment that the Contracting Officer will make to cover any increases in wages and benefits as a result of-                                                         (1) 								                Incorporation of the Department of Labor’s wage determination applicable at the exercise of the option to extend the term of the contract;                                                            (2) 								                Incorporation of a wage determination otherwise applied to the contract by operation of law; or                                                            (3) 								                An increase in wages and benefits resulting from any other requirement applicable to workers subject to the Construction Wage Rate Requirements statute.                                                                    (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.222 [Reserved]
# Subpart 1330.2 - CAS Program Requirements

**Parent topic:**PART 1330 - COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ADMINISTRATION

## 1330.201 Contract requirements.

## 1330.201-5 Waiver.

The designee authorized to waive the applicability of Cost Accounting Standards for a particular contract or subcontract is set forth in CAM 1301.70.   

## 1330.202 Disclosure requirements.

## 1330.202-2 Impracticality of submission.

The DOC Head of Agency for Procurement is authorized to determine that it is impractical to secure a Disclosure Statement, although submission is required, and to authorize contract award without obtaining the Statement.
#### In the Matter of Richard A. Brown, as District Attorney of Queens County, Appellant, v Joel L. Blumenfeld et al., Respondents.

Submitted December 17, 2007;

decided January 15, 2008

Reported below, 45 AD3d 836.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the issues presented have become moot.
#### Town of Poughkeepsie, Appellant, v Thomas Espie et al., Respondents.

Submitted November 5, 2007;

decided December 20, 2007

Reported below, 41 AD3d 701.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION

BUDDY GILL, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 1:06cv718-MHT

) 

SORRELLS FUNERAL HOME, )

INC., and TERRY G. )

SORRELLS, )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion to dismiss (doc. no. 7)

is denied.

DONE, this the 27th day of September, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00718-MHT-SRW Document 13 Filed 09/27/2006 Page 1 of 1
Editorial Note on Part 982
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 61 FR 17559, Apr. 22, 1996.

§ 982.50 Restricted obligation. ( a ) No handler shall handle inshell hazelnuts unless prior to or upon shipment thereof, he: ( 1 ) Has withheld from handling a quantity, by weight, of certified merchantable hazelnuts determined by dividing the quantity handled, or to be handled, by the applicable free percentage and multiplying the quotient by the restricted percentage;
( 2 ) has withheld from handling an equivalent quantity of creditable ungraded inshell hazelnuts under § 982.51(a); or
( 3 ) has under § 982.51(b), declared in lieu of a quantity of certified merchantable hazelnuts, under paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the equivalent quantity, by weight as determined under that section, of shelled hazelnuts certified as meeting the standards in effect for Oregon No. 1 grade for shelled hazelnuts as contained in Oregon Grade Standards for Hazelnut Kernels or such other standards as may be recommended by the Board and established by the Secretary. Any handler who intends to withhold shelled hazelnuts in satisfaction of a restricted obligation must make such declaration to the Board prior to shelling any such hazelnuts. Withholding may be temporarily deferred under the bonding provisions in § 982.54. The quantity of hazelnuts required to be withheld shall be the restricted obligation. Certified merchantable hazelnuts handled in accordance with this subpart shall be deemed to be the handler's quota fixed by the Secretary within the meaning of section 8a(5) of the Act.
( b ) Inshell hazelnuts withheld by a handler in satisfaction of his restricted obligation shall not be handled and shall be held by him subject to examination by and accounting control of, the Board until disposed of pursuant to this part.
( c ) A handler having certified merchantable hazelnuts which have not been handled at the end of a marketing year may elect to have those hazelnuts bear the restricted and assessment obligations of that year or of the marketing year in which handled. The Board shall establish such procedures as are necessary to facilitate the administration of this option among handlers.
( d ) Whenever the restricted percentage for a marketing year is reduced, each handler's restricted obligation shall be reduced to conform with the new restricted percentage. Any handler who, upon such reduction, is withholding restricted hazelnuts in excess of his new restricted obligation may have the excess freed from withholding by complying with such procedures as the Board may require to insure identification of the remaining hazelnuts withheld.
[40 FR 53227, Nov. 17, 1975, as amended at 46 FR 26039, May 11, 1981]
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 13 

Encouraging increased public awareness of eating disorders and expanded 

research for treatment and cures. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2005 

Mrs. BIGGERT submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Encouraging increased public awareness of eating disorders 

and expanded research for treatment and cures. 

Whereas an estimated 5,000,000 to 10,000,000 people in the 

United States suffer from eating disorders, including 

anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge eating disorder; 

Whereas eating disorders are more common among women, 

but an increasing number of men also suffer from these 

disorders; 

Whereas an estimated 0.5 to 3.7 percent of women in the 

United States will suffer from anorexia nervosa in their 

lifetimes, an estimated 1.1 to 4.2 percent of women in 

the United States will suffer from bulimia nervosa, and 

an estimated 2 to 5 percent of people in the United 
2 

•HRES 13 IH 

States experience binge eating disorder during any given 

6-month period; 

Whereas anorexia nervosa has the highest premature mortality rate of any mental illness; 

Whereas eating disorders are associated with serious physical 

health consequences, including irregular heartbeats, heart 

disease and heart failure, kidney failure, osteoporosis, 

gastric rupture, peptic ulcer, tooth decay, obesity, gall 

bladder disease, diabetes, and death; 

Whereas eating disorders are also associated with substantial 

psychological problems, including depression, substance 

abuse, and suicide; and 

Whereas shame, guilt, and misunderstanding often afflict a 

person who suffers from an eating disorder, and prevent 

the treatment of the disorder: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives encour2 ages— 

3 (1) increasing public awareness of eating dis4 orders; 

5 (2) expanding research for treatment and cures; 

6 (3) broadening access to treatment; and 

7 (4) promoting healthful eating habits and a 

8 healthy body image. 

Æ
Case 1:06-cr-00185-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cr-00185-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 36 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 36 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 2 of 2
```

[107th Congress Public Law 235]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ235.107]

[[Page 116 STAT. 1482]]

Public Law 107-235
107th Congress

                            Joint Resolution

 
 Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2003, and 
     for other purposes. <<NOTE: Oct. 4, 2002 -  [H.J. Res. 112]>> 

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law 107-229 is 
amended by striking the date specified in section <<NOTE: Ante, p. 
1467.>> 107(c) and inserting in lieu thereof ``October 11, 2002''.

    Approved October 4, 2002.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.J. Res. 112:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 148 (2002):
            Oct. 3, considered and passed House and Senate.

                                  <all>
```