alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Office of the Secretary

# ACTION:

Meeting notice.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Labor Advisory Committee for Trade Negotiation and Trade Policy.

*Date, Time, Place:*                         January 12, 2011; 10 a.m.-11:30 a.m.; U.S. Department of Labor, Secretary's Conference Room, 200 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC.                    

*Purpose:*                         The meeting will include a review and discussion of current issues which influence U.S. trade policy. Potential U.S. negotiating objectives and bargaining positions in current and anticipated trade negotiations will be discussed. Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 2155(f) it has been determined that the meeting will be concerned with matters the disclosure of which would seriously compromise the Government's negotiating objectives or bargaining positions. Accordingly, the meeting will be closed to the public.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT:

                        Gregory Schoepfle, Director, Office of Trade and Labor Affairs;                         *Phone:*                         (202) 693-4887.                    

Signed at Washington, DC, the 10th day of December, 2010.

Sandra Polaski,

Deputy Undersecretary International Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2010-31582 Filed 12-15-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-28-P
Case 3:06-cr-00208-MEF-CSC Document 22 Filed 09/29/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 3:06-cr-00208-MEF-CSC Document 22 Filed 09/29/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 3:06-cr-00208-MEF-CSC Document 22 Filed 09/29/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 3:06-cr-00208-MEF-CSC Document 22 Filed 09/29/2006 Page 4 of 4
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 22, 2018.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, January 22, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A18D0266. STEVE COOK v. DANA CAMPBELL-COOK.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

17CV1115
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








The
      undersigned, James B. Wiegand, Chief Executive Officer of Ambermax II
      Corporation (the “Company”), certifies, under the standards set forth and solely
      for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on
      Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended October 31, 2007 fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-QSB fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.











/s/
        James B. Wiegand


James
      B.
      Wiegand


Principal
      Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer


December 13,
      2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          34,136
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           2,700
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                53,375
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    129,555
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          12,360
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            12,713
<LOANS>                                        564,760
<ALLOWANCE>                                      6,776
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 834,764
<DEPOSITS>                                     683,123
<SHORT-TERM>                                    34,107
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              6,274
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,713
<OTHER-SE>                                      91,547
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 834,764
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 12,845
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,103
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   745
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                15,693
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,542
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,982
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            9,711
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      200
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  44
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,744
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,641
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       5,641
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,717
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .61
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.39
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,818
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,695
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   331
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  7,259
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 6,254
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      556
<RECOVERIES>                                       878
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                6,776
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             4,503
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          2,273
        

</TABLE>
§ 1015.502 Prompt referral. ( a ) If a debt is not referred to the DOJ through Treasury's cross-servicing program, DOE shall promptly refer to the DOJ for litigation debts on which aggressive collection activity has been taken in accordance with § 1015.200 of this part and that cannot be compromised, or on which collection activity cannot be suspended or terminated, in accordance with §§ 1015.300 and 1015.400 of this part. DOE may refer those debts arising out of activities of DOE. Debts for which the principal amount is over $1,000,000, or such other amount as the Attorney General may direct, exclusive of interest and penalties, shall be referred to the Civil Division or other division responsible for litigating such debts at the DOJ, Washington, DC. Debts for which the principal amount is $1,000,000, or less, or such other amount as the Attorney General may direct, exclusive of interest or penalties, shall be referred to the DOJ's Nationwide Central Intake Facility as required by the CCLR instructions. Claims will be referred as early as possible, consistent with aggressive agency collection activity and the observance of the standards contained in the Federal Claims Collection Standards (31 CFR parts 900-904), and, in any event, well within the period for initiating timely lawsuits against the debtors. DOE shall make every effort to refer delinquent debts to the DOJ for litigation within one year of the date such debts last became delinquent. In the case of guaranteed or insured loans, DOE will make every effort to refer these delinquent debts to the DOJ for litigation within one year from the date the loan was presented to DOE for payment or re-insurance.
( b ) The DOJ has exclusive jurisdiction over the debts referred to it pursuant to this section. DOE shall refrain from having any contact with the debtor and shall direct all debtor inquiries concerning the claim to the DOJ. DOE shall notify the DOJ immediately of any payments credited by DOE to the debtor's account after referral of a debt or claim under this section. The DOJ shall notify DOE, in a timely manner, of any payments it receives from the debtor.
#### In the Matter of William R. Lightbody, Appellant, v Irene Lightbody, Respondent.

Submitted December 10, 2007;

decided January 10, 2008

Reported below, 42 AD3d 537.

Motion for leave to appeal denied with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements. Motion for a stay dismissed as academic.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2947 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2947

  To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Fast Yellow 2 Stage 
                              Liquid Feed.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 23, 2006

  Mr. Carper introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Fast Yellow 2 Stage 
                              Liquid Feed.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FAST YELLOW 2 STAGE LIQUID FEED.

    (a) In General.--Subheading 9902.04.19 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Fast Yellow 2 Stage) is 
amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# Subpart 623.2—Energy and Water Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Source:                                80 FR 6921, Feb. 9, 2015, unless otherwise noted.                               

**Parent topic:**PART 623—ENVIRONMENT, ENERGY AND WATER EFFICIENCY, RENEWABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY, AND DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE

## 623.204 Procurement exemptions.

The head of the contracting activity is the agency head's designee for the purpose of executing the written determination to not purchase ENERGY STAR® or FEMP-designated products.”
###### Editorial Note on Part 982

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 61 FR 17559, Apr. 22, 1996.

#### § 982.13 Substandard hazelnuts.

*Substandard hazelnuts* means hazelnuts, inshell or shelled, that do not meet the minimum standards effective pursuant to § 982.45.
Subpart 1537.1 - Service Contracts - General    **Parent topic:** PART 1537 - SERVICE CONTRACTING1537.110 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.       The following clauses are prescribed for service contracts. They may also be used in research and development contracts when applicable (see 1535.007-70).          (a) The Contracting Officer shall insert the clause at 1552.237-70, Contract Publication Review Procedures, in solicitations and contracts when the products of the contract are subject to contract publication review.          (b) The Contracting Officer shall insert a clause substantially the same as the clause at 1552.237-71, Technical Direction, in solicitations and contracts where the Contracting Officer intends to delegate authority to issue technical direction to the Contracting Officer's Representative(s).          (c) The Contracting Officer shall insert the clause at 1552.237-72, Key Personnel, in solicitations and contracts when it is necessary for contract performance to identify Contractor key personnel. Contracting Officers have the flexibility to identify the required number of days of key personnel commitment during the early stages of contractor performance. The length of time will be based on the requirements of individual acquisitions when continued assignment is essential to the successful implementation of the program's mission. Therefore, Contracting Officers may use a clause substantially the same as in 48 CFR 1552.237-72, regarding substitution of key personnel. Contracting Officers may include a different number of days in excess of the ninety (90) days included in this clause, if approved at one level above the Contracting Officer.          (d) The Contracting Officer shall insert the clause at 1552.237-74, Publicity, in solicitations and contracts pertaining to the removal or remedial activities under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA).          (e) The Contracting Officer shall insert the clause at 1552.237-75, Paperwork Reduction Act, in solicitations and contracts requiring the collection of identical information from (10) or more public respondents.          (f) To ensure that Agency contracts are administered so as to avoid creating an improper employer-employee relationship, contracting officers shall insert the contract clause at 1552.237-76, “Government-Contractor Relations”, in all solicitations and contracts for non-personal services that exceed the simplified acquisition threshold.
#### § 986.96 Amendments.

Amendments to this part may be proposed from time to time by the Council or by the Secretary.
#### § 1017.24 Storage.

A document or material marked as containing UCNI must be stored to preclude unauthorized disclosure. When not in use, documents or material containing UCNI must be stored in locked receptacles (e.g., file cabinet, desk drawer), or if in secured areas or facilities, in a manner that would prevent inadvertent access by an unauthorized individual.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3349 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3349

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on certain fluoropolymers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 26, 2006

  Mr. Shelby introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on certain fluoropolymers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF CERTAIN DUTY SUSPENSIONS ON CERTAIN 
              FLUOROPOLYMERS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.39.04 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to fluoropolymers containing 95 
percent or more by weight of the 3 monomer units tetrafluoroethylene, 
hexafluoropropylene, and vinylidene fluoride) is amended by striking 
the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 987.25 Qualification.

Each person selected as a member or alternate member of the Committee shall, prior to serving on the Committee, qualify by filing with the Secretary a written acceptance after receiving notice of his selection. Any member or alternate who, at the time of his selection, was a member of or employed by a member of the group which nominated him shall, upon ceasing to be such member or employee, become disqualified to serve further and his position on the Committee shall be deemed vacant.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ANGELA DENISE NAILS, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

 )

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06cv737-WKW

) (WO)

DOTHAN RESCUE MISSION, )

 )

Defendant. )

ORDER

This action is presently before the court on plaintiff's motion to extend the deadline

for the settlement conference (Doc. # 17). The scheduling order of the court sets that

deadline at fourteen days after the dispositive motion deadline which, in this case, is January

29, 2007. Plaintiff's motion sets forth no reason why the conference cannot be conducted

within the time allowed by the court and, accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the motion is DENIED.

Additionally, it appears that plaintiff has failed to serve her motion for extension of

time on opposing counsel. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure require that the plaintiff

mail to the lawyer for the defendant a true copy of anything which she files with the court

in this action. Failure to do so may result in dismissal of this case or other penalties.

Anything plaintiff files must contain a certificate of service which specifically states that the

pleading has been sent to the lawyer for the defendant. The clerk is hereby DIRECTED to

return to the plaintiff – without filing – any pleadings submitted by the plaintiff which do not

Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 18 Filed 11/08/2006 Page 1 of 2
1

 As an example, the court directs plaintiff's attention to the certificate of service

attached to the answer served by defendant on the plaintiff on October 10, 2006.

include a certificate of service reflecting that the pleading has been served on opposing

counsel.1

DONE, this 8th day of November, 2006.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 18 Filed 11/08/2006 Page 2 of 2
2908.404 Using schedules.       Small business considerations, procedures regarding both prime and subcontracting, and clearances specified in DOLAR 2919 apply to GSA Federal Supply Schedule Orders above the simplified acquisition threshold. Procedures to be followed may be modified by the Office of Small Business Program as appropriate in order to comply with GSA Federal Supply Schedule procedures (e.g., first tier contracts may be required to report their commercial subcontracting goals to the DOL Office of Small Business Programs).    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2908.4 - Federal Supply Schedules
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          13,314
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  409,998
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,077
<INVENTORY>                                     72,006
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               573,624
<PP&E>                                         826,354
<DEPRECIATION>                                 413,709
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,275,021
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          608,669
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,555,420
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,275,021
<SALES>                                      1,258,486
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,258,486
<CGS>                                          785,256
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,107,933
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   258
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,445
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                120,230
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   120,230
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        




</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Monroe S. Gould, Appellant-Respondent, v. Francis B. Looney, as Commissioner of the Police Department, Nassau County, et al., Respondents-Appellants.

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the OPLR to annul petitioner’s suspension as a patrolman in the employ of the Nassau County Police Department, the parties cross-appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated October 28, 1969, as follows: Petitioner appeals from so much of the judgment as dismissed the petition in part; and respondents appeal from so much of the judgment as adjudged that respondents are required to pay petitioner his full salary for the period he was on suspension, i.e., from July 28, 1969 to September 9, 1969, when he was dismissed. Judgment modified, on the law, by striking from the decretal paragraph thereof the date “ July 28, 1969 ” and substituting therefor the date “ August 27, 1969”. As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs. The respondent Commissioner of Police had power to suspend petitioner, a patrolman, without pay for a period not exceeding 30 days (Civil Service Law, § 75, subd. 3; Nassau County Administrative Code, § 8-13.0 [L. 1939, ch. 272, as amd.]). After such 30-day period, petitioner had to be given his full pay until the date of his dismissal. Rabin, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Kleinfeld and Benjamin, JJ., concur. [60 Misc 2d 973.]