alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Elder, Bray and Senior Judge Baker 

Argued at Richmond, Virginia 

JAMES MARLON WINN, IV 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION* BY 

v. Record No. 0996-98-2 JUDGE JOSEPH E. BAKER 

 MAY 18, 1999 

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA 

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND 

Robert W. Duling, Judge 

Esther J. Windmueller for appellant. 

Eugene Murphy, Assistant Attorney General 

(Mark L. Earley, Attorney General, on brief), 

for appellee. 

 James Marlon Winn, IV (appellant) appeals from an order of 

the Circuit Court of the City of Richmond (trial court) requiring 

that he post $1,000 of a $10,000 "appeal" bond in cash.1 

Appellant is indigent. At oral argument, appellant conceded the 

trial court's authority to set reasonable post-conviction bail, 

including requiring a cash "freedom" bond to secure the bail. See

Code § 19.2-319. Likewise, the Commonwealth conceded that the 

trial court could not require appellant to post a cash appeal 

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, recodifying Code § 17-116.010, 

this opinion is not designated for publication.

1

Appellant's petition for appeal of the underlying criminal 

conviction was denied by this Court and is currently pending 

before the Virginia Supreme Court. 
bond. See Code §§ 19.2-322.1 and 8.01-676.1(K).2 Thus, the sole 

question for appeal is whether the trial court was setting an 

appeal bond or a "freedom" bond. 

 At the April 8, 1998 hearing, to refresh the judge's memory 

of what had happened, counsel for appellant advised the court that 

"[a]n appeal bond [had been] set in the amount of $10,000; $2,000 

of which was to be cash." The trial court did not question or 

correct counsel's use of the term "appeal bond." Counsel for 

appellant also referred to Code § 8.01-676.1, which solely 

addresses appeal bonds, without comment from the court. Finally, 

the trial court's April 8, 1998 order provides: "An appeal bond 

is set at $10,000, with surety, $1,000 of said bond to be posted 

in cash."3

 "A court speaks through its written orders." Robinson v. 

Commonwealth, 28 Va. App. 148, 155, 502 S.E.2d 704, 708 (1998). 

While the April 8 hearing record is somewhat ambiguous, the trial 

court, perhaps unintentionally, entered an order expressly setting 

a cash "appeal bond." Because appellant was indigent, this was 

prohibited by statute.4 Accordingly, the trial court's decision 

 2

Code § 8.01-676.1(K) provides that "[n]o person who is an 

indigent shall be required to post security for an appeal bond." 

3

The trial court agreed to reduce the cash portion from 

$2,000 to $1,000. 

 - 2 -

4

We do not address appellant's claim, raised for the first 

time on appeal, that the trial court's ruling violated his 

Eighth Amendment rights. See Rule 5A:18. 
is reversed, and the matter is remanded to the trial court with 

instructions to take all necessary steps consistent with this 

opinion. 

 Reversed and remanded.

 - 3 -
Exhibit
      32





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the annual report of Cavico Corp. (the "Company") on Form
      10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Ha Quang Bui, Chief
      Executive Officer, and Edward K. Chi, Financial Officer, certify pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 that:




(1)
      This
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Ha Quang Bui
            
            
            /s/
                Edward K. ChiHa
                Quang Bui
              Chief
                Executive Officer
            
            
            Edward
                K. Chi
              Chief
                Financial OfficerDate:
                March 27, 2008
            
            
            Date:
                March 27, 2008
---

Exhibit 99.7




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Ur-Energy Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Roger L. Smith, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: March 18, 2011


/s/ Roger L. Smith


Roger L. Smith


Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.26
REVANCE THERAPEUTICS, INC. 
 
2018 MANAGEMENT BONUS PROGRAM 


On February 8, 2018, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Revance Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) approved the Company’s 2018 corporate objectives, weighted for purposes of determining bonuses, if any, for the Company’s executive officers with respect to performance for fiscal year 2018 (the “2018 Bonus Program”). 


The 2018 Bonus Program is designed to reward, through the payment of annual cash bonuses, the Company’s executive officers for the Company’s performance in meeting key corporate objectives and for individual performance in meeting specified corporate goals for the year. 


The Company’s 2018 corporate goals include the achievement of clinical development and non-clinical milestones for RT002 injectable for the treatment of glabellar (frown) lines, cervical dystonia, plantar fasciitis and other potential indications (65% weighting), achievement of commercialization objectives (20% weighting), and achievement of other research and regulatory milestones (5-15% weighting), as well as a stretch goal of achieving other development related milestones (up to 25% weighting).


The cash bonus for L. Daniel Browne will be based on the achievement of the 2018 corporate goals (100% weighting). The cash bonus for Todd Zavodnick, Lauren P. Silvernail and Abhay Joshi, Ph.D. will be based on the achievement of the 2018 corporate goals (75% weighting) and his or her individual performance goals (25% weighting). The executive officers’ actual bonuses for fiscal year 2018 may exceed 100% of his or her 2018 target bonus percentage in the event performance exceeds the predetermined goals and/or upon the achievement of other specified goals, including stretch goals.
 
Payment of bonuses to the Company’s executive officers under the 2018 Bonus Program and the actual amount of such bonus, if any, are within the discretion of the Compensation Committee. The actual bonus awarded, if any, may be more or less than each executive’s annual target bonus.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

LEROY WILLIAMS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO 2:06-cv-658-ID

)

STATE OF ALABAMA DEP’T OF )

TRANSPORTATION, et al., )

 )

Defendants. )

ORDER

Upon referral of this case to the undersigned for discovery issues, it is

ORDERED that the parties appear telephonically on May 2, 2007 at 9:00 a.m. for

a HEARING on Defendants’ Motion for Protective Order or, In The Alternative, Motion to

Quash Deposition Notices (Doc. 20, filed May 1, 2007) and Plaintiff’s Response (Doc. 21,

filed May 1, 2007). The hearing shall be attended by at least one of the attorneys

representing each of the parties. The parties shall jointly contact the court at (334) 954-3740

by 9:00 a.m. to initiate the hearing. 

DONE this 1st day of May, 2007.

 

TERRY F. MOORER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00658-TFM Document 22 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 23 Filed 01/31/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 23 Filed 01/31/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 23 Filed 01/31/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 23-2 Filed 01/31/2007 Page 1 of 16
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 23-2 Filed 01/31/2007 Page 2 of 16
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 23-2 Filed 01/31/2007 Page 3 of 16
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 23-2 Filed 01/31/2007 Page 4 of 16
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 23-2 Filed 01/31/2007 Page 5 of 16
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 23-2 Filed 01/31/2007 Page 6 of 16
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 23-2 Filed 01/31/2007 Page 7 of 16
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 23-2 Filed 01/31/2007 Page 8 of 16
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 23-2 Filed 01/31/2007 Page 9 of 16
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 23-2 Filed 01/31/2007 Page 10 of 16
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 23-2 Filed 01/31/2007 Page 11 of 16
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 23-2 Filed 01/31/2007 Page 12 of 16
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 23-2 Filed 01/31/2007 Page 13 of 16
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 23-2 Filed 01/31/2007 Page 14 of 16
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 23-2 Filed 01/31/2007 Page 15 of 16
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 23-2 Filed 01/31/2007 Page 16 of 16
#### E. REGENSBURG & SONS v. ROSENTHAL.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July 10, 1914.)

Action by E. Regensburg & Sons against Harris L. Rosenthal.

No opinion. Application denied, with $10 costs. Order signed.
EPA and Port of Portland Meeting April 2 , 2013 Attendees EPA

– Li z McDermott, Tim Smith Port of Portland

– David Ashton, Joshua Cleaver, Stan Jones EPA and Port of Portland met to discuss a number of issues from the proposed revisions to the UST regulations. The discussion was primaril y about previously deferred airport hy drant sy stems.
SUBCHAPTER A - GENERAL

PART 300 [RESERVED]

PART 301 - HHS ACQUISITION REGULATION SYSTEM

PART 302 - DEFINITIONS OF WORDS AND TERMS

PART 303 - IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF

INTEREST

PART 304 - ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS

PART 300 [RESERVED]

PART 301 - HHS ACQUISITION REGULATION SYSTEM

Subpart 301.1 - Purpose, Authority, and Issuance

301.101 Purpose.

301.103 Authority.

301.106 Office of Management and Budget approval under the Paperwork

Reduction Act.

Subpart 301.2 [Reserved]

Subpart 301.4 - Deviations from the FAR

301.401 Deviations.

Subpart 301.6 - Career Development, Contracting Authority, and Responsibilities

301.602 Contracting officers.

301.602-3 Ratification of unauthorized commitments.

301.603 Selection, appointment, and termination of appointment of contracting

officers.

301.603-1 General.

PART 302 - DEFINITIONS OF WORDS AND TERMS

Subpart 302.1 - Definitions

302.101 Definitions.

PART 303 - IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Subpart 303.1 - Safeguards

303.101 Standards of conduct.

303.101-3 Agency regulations.

303.104-7 Violations or possible violations of the Procurement Integrity Act.

Subpart 303.2 - Contractor Gratuities to Government Personnel

303.203 Reporting suspected violations of the Gratuities clause.

Subpart 303.6 - Contracts with Government Employees or Organizations Owned or

Controlled by Them

303.602 Exceptions.

Subpart 303.7 - Voiding and Rescinding Contracts

303.704 Policy.

Subpart 303.8 - Limitation on the Payment of Funds to Influence Federal Transactions

303.808-70 Solicitation provision and contract clause.

Subpart 303.10 - Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct

303.1003 Requirements.

PART 304 - ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS

Subpart 304.6 - Contract Reporting

304.602 General.

304.604 Responsibilities.

Subpart 304.13 - Personal Identity Verification
304.1300 Policy.

Subpart 304.16 - Unique Procurement Instrument Identifiers

304.1600 Scope of subpart.

Subpart 304.70 [Reserved]

Subpart 304.71 - Review and Approval of Proposed Contract Actions

304.7100 Policy.

Subpart 304.72 - Affordable Care Act Prevention and Public Health Fund - Reporting

Requirements

304.7200 Scope of subpart.

304.7201 Procedures.

304.7202 Contract clause.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet dated March 31, 1999 and its
Consolidated Statement of Operations covering the period from October 1,
1998 to March 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statement and notes thereof.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           16518
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    35282
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    6465727
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         2445121
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1322334
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8432902
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        1571056
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          5918
<OTHER-SE>                                     6371244
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   8432902
<SALES>                                        1250327
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1250327
<CGS>                                           478396
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   478396
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                815269
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               82709
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (83191)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (75030)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (75030)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.01)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

DONNA L. EARLY, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

vs. ) CASE No.: 2:06cv727 

 ) 

RHEEM MANUFACTURING ) 

COMPANY, a corporation and ) 

CAL MEARS, an individual, ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL

COME NOW the Parties, by and through their counsel of record, and move this 

Court to dismiss the above-styled case with prejudice, and with each party to bear its own 

costs. 

 Respectfully submitted on this the 23rd day of July 2007. 

/s/Henry C. Barnett, Jr. 

HENRY C. BARNETT, JR. (BAR037) 

ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS

CAPELL & HOWARD, P.C.

150 South Perry Street (36104) 

Post Office Box 2069 

Montgomery, Alabama 36102-2069 

/s/Trina S. Williams 

TRINA S. WILLIAMS (SAN046) 

VICKY U. TOLES (UND014) 

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

TOLES & WILLIAMS, LLP 

1015 South McDonough Street 

Montgomery, Alabama 36104 

Case 2:06-cv-00727-WKW-CSC Document 22 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 25 Filed 12/18/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 25 Filed 12/18/2006 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 25-2 Filed 12/18/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 25-2 Filed 12/18/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 25-2 Filed 12/18/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 25-2 Filed 12/18/2006 Page 4 of 4
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7429** 

JOE LEE FULGHAM , Petitioner

– Appellant ,
v. NONE , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. ( 2:12

- cv - 00445

- AWA

- TEM )

Submitted : January 26, 2016 Decided: February 16, 2016

Before WILKINSON, THACKER, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Joe Lee Fulgham, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Joe Lee Fulgham seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 ( 2012 ) petition. Th e order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wron g. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, a nd that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Fulgham has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny leave to proc eed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability , deny Fulgham’s motion to appoint counsel, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the3 materials before th is cour t and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 930.53 Modification, suspension, or termination of regulations. ( a ) In the event the Board at any time finds that, by reason of changed conditions, any regulations issued pursuant to § 930.44 or § 930.51 should be modified, suspended, or terminated, it shall so recommend to the Secretary.
( b ) Whenever the Secretary finds, from the recommendations and information submitted by the Board or from other available information, that a regulation issued pursuant to § 930.44 or § 930.51 should be modified, suspended or terminated with respect to any or all shipments of cherries in order to effectuate the declared policy of the Act, the Secretary shall modify, suspend, or terminate such regulation.
EXHIBIT 35.1
                  SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                        RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC
             RALI SERIES 2006-QS14 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized officer of Residential Funding Company, LLC,
as servicer  (the  "Servicer")  pursuant to the Series  Supplement,  dated as of
October 30, 2006,  and the Standard  Terms of Pooling and  Servicing  Agreement,
dated as of October 30, 2006 (as amended  from time to time,  the  "Agreement"),
among Residential Accredit Loans, Inc., as company, Residential Funding Company,
LLC, as master servicer,  and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas,  as trustee,
does hereby  certify that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled  all of its  obligations  under  the  Agreement  in all  material
     respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:      /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title:    Managing Director
162 So.2d 13

#### Boyd MITCHELL et al. v. NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION et al.

No. 47175.

March 31, 1964.

In re: Boyd Mitchell and his wife, Mrs. Mollie Irene Mitchell, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of More-house. 160 So.2d 253.

The application is denied. According to the facts of this case as found to be by the Court of Appeal, the judgment complained of is correct.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                        10
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,182
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (83)
<INVENTORY>                                     14,132
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,738
<PP&E>                                           8,402
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,028)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  30,519
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,852
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           125
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,092
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    30,519
<SALES>                                         20,781
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,781
<CGS>                                           14,129
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,129
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,662
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 586
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,596)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,596)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,596)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.21)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
PART II, ITEM 6, EXHIBIT 11.


                              EGAN SYSTEMS, INC.
                       COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                               Six Months Ended June 30,

                                                              1996                  1995
<S>                                                       <C>                   <C>
Net income (loss) applicable to common stock              $    (9,074)          $  (58,670)


Outstanding shares - common stock at January 1,            10,185,000            8,435,000


Dilutive effect of stock options and warrants               4,230,000            1,400,000


Weighted average shares issued during period                        -               66,667


Weighted average common shares outstanding -
 primary and fully diluted - June 30,                      14,415,000            9,901,667


Net income per common share -
 primary and fully diluted - June 30,                     $      0.00           $    (0.01)
</TABLE>



                                     10
H. Res. 111

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

February 16, 2005.

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are

hereby elected, to the following standing committees of the

House of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON HOUSE ADMINISTRATION: Ms. Zoe

Lofgren of California.

COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS: Ms. Moore of Wisconsin.

Attest:

Clerk.