alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          20,884
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  131,379
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      44,617,527
<DEPRECIATION>                              22,508,693
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,108,834
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,178,848
<BONDS>                                     32,736,164
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (25,851,719)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,423,030
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,814,958
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,526,567
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,126,559
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,312,044)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,312,044)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,312,044)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (111.15)


</TABLE>
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed April 17, 2024. 

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-1783

Lower Tribunal No. F18-15004B

________________

Jermaine Sheldon King, 

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida, 

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Thomas J.

Rebull, Judge.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Manuel Alvarez, Assistant

Public Defender, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Senior

Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. 

Before FERNANDEZ, LINDSEY and MILLER, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3579 

To reduce temporarily the duty on certain women’s footwear covering the 

ankle with coated or laminated textile fabrics. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 27, 2006 

Mr. CARPER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on certain women’s footwear 

covering the ankle with coated or laminated textile fabrics. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN WOMEN’S FOOTWEAR COVERING THE 

4 ANKLE WITH COATED OR LAMINATED TEX5 TILE FABRICS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


wwhite on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
2 

•S 3579 IS 

‘‘ 9902.64.11 Women’s footwear, except 

vulcanized footwear and 

footwear with waterproof 

molded bottoms, including 

bottoms comprising an outer 

sole and all or part of the 

upper, valued over $20/pair, 

covering the ankle, whose 

height from the bottom of 

the outer sole to the top of 

the upper does not exceed 8 

inches, designed to be worn 

in lieu of, but not over, other 

footwear as a protection 

against water, oil, grease or 

chemicals or cold or inclement weather where such protection includes protection 

against water that is imparted by the use of a coated or laminated textile fabric 

(provided in subheading 

6404.19.20) ......................... 20% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwhite on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
|                                      |
|--------------------------------------|
|                                      |  |
| Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas | BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware |
| As Indenture Trustee                 | As Owner Trustee |
| Attn:  Michelle H.Y. Voon  | Attn:  Robert Castle / Kristine Gullo |
| 100 Plaza One 6th Floor         | 100 White Clay Center, Suite 102 |
| Jersey City, NY 07311                | Newark, DE  19711 |

|                                                 |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                                 |  |
| The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. | Ally Auto Assets LLC |
| Attn:  Robert Castle                  | Ally Financial Inc. |
| 2 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1020              | 200 Renaissance Center |
| Chicago, IL  60602                    | 12th Floor, MC 482-B12-C24 |
|                                            | Detroit, MI |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| Re:    | Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2012-5 |
|   | Annual Statement as to Compliance |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| a. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period of October 24, 2012 through December 31, 2012, and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has been under his supervision, and |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| b. | To the best of his knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement throughout such period. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | Very truly yours, |
|   |   |
|   | /s/ David J. DeBrunner |   |
|   | David J. DeBrunner |
|   | Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |
|   | Ally Financial Inc. |
Form 12451

(Rev. January 2005) Request for Relocation Expenses Allowance

Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service

Submit this form only with an application for certificate of Discharge of Property under IRC section 6325(b)(2)(A)

when relocation expenses are being requested in connection with the sale of a principal residence. Any amount

approved will be deducted from sale proceeds and will not reduce the amount of your tax liability. This allowance

is based upon inability to pay relocation expenses and is subject to limitations. To process your request, please

provide the information requested below. If additional information is needed, you will be contacted.

Section I. Taxpayer Information

1. Taxpayer name 2. Taxpayer identification

 number (EIN or SSN)

3. Address of property being sold (Street, City, State, Zip code)

4. Property is principle residence of taxpayer ("X" appropriate box.)

5. Address of new residence (Street, City State, ZIP code)

6. Amount of relocation expenses requested (Please provide sufficient documentation to support requested expenses.)

Section II. Taxpayer Attestation

Signature of Taxpayer Date

Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this application,

including all attachments, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, it is

true, correct, and complete.

Catalog Number 28667B www.irs.gov Form 12451 (Rev. 1-2005)

7. This allowance may be granted only when inability to pay relocation expenses is determined by United States.

 Please explain your financial circumstances and provide supporting documentation.

a. Yes b. No (If "No" is checked, a relocation allowance cannot be approved.)
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-50434 Conference Calendar

KEVIN DEWAYNE GRANT, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus RANDALL BRUTON, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-95-CV-147

- - - - - - - - - - October 23, 1996 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Kevin Dewayne Grant, #441812, an inmate of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, moves for leave to appeal in forma pauperis (IFP) from the district court’s grant of the defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law. Because his appeal fails to present a nonfrivolous issue, the motion for IFP is DENIED. Fed. R. App. P. 24(a). Grant’s motion for a copy ofNo. 96-50434 - 2 - his trial transcript at Government expense is also DENIED. The appeal is DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2. We caution appellant that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, appellant is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous.
APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

October 3, 2007

NOTICE OF CORRECTION

From: Clerk’s Office

Case Style: United States of America vs. Seventy Four Thousand Seven Hundred Dollars

Case Number: 2:06cv736-WKW

Pleading : #30 - Scheduling Order

Notice of Correction is being filed this date to advise that the referenced Order entered on

10/3/07 is hereby STRICKEN from the record as a docketing error. This order was entered

in the wrong case.

Case 2:06-cv-00736-WKW-SRW Document 31 Filed 10/03/2007 Page 1 of 1
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-08-30T20:48:50-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 27 Filed 03/12/2007 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 27 Filed 03/12/2007 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 27 Filed 03/12/2007 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 27 Filed 03/12/2007 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 27 Filed 03/12/2007 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 27 Filed 03/12/2007 Page 6 of 6
PART 711—DESCRIBING AGENCY NEEDS       Authority:                            Sec. 621, Pub. L. 87–195, 75 Stat. 445, (22 U.S.C. 2381) as amended; E.O. 12163, Sept. 29, 1979, 44 FR 56673; 3 CFR, 1979 Comp., p. 435.                                       711.002-70 Metric system waivers.                                          711.002-71 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.    **Parent topic:** SUBCHAPTER B—ACQUISITION PLANNING711.002-70 Metric system waivers.       (a) *Criteria.* The (48 CFR) FAR 11.002(b) requirement to use the metric system of measurement for specifications and quantitative data that are incorporated in or required by USAID contracts may be waived when USAID determines in writing that such usage is impractical or is likely to cause U.S. firms to experience significant inefficiencies or the loss of markets.          (b) *Authorization.*          (1)  			The USAID Metric Executive (as designated in ADS Chapter 323), the contracting officer, and the USAID official who approves the procurement requirement are authorized to waive the metric requirement for one of the above reasons. The USAID Metric Executive is authorized to overrule a decision to grant a waiver, or to nullify a blanket waiver made by another approving official so long as a contractor's rights under an executed contract are not infringed upon.          (2) A blanket waiver for a class of multiple transactions may be issued for a term not to exceed three years.          (3) When a waiver will be based upon the adverse impact on U.S. firms, clearance from the USAID Metric Executive and the Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization (OSDBU) will be obtained prior to authorization.          (c) *Records and reporting.*          (1)  			The basis for each waiver and any plans to adapt similar requirements to metric specifications in future procurements should be documented in the contract file.          (2) Each procurement activity will maintain a log of the waivers from the metric requirements which are authorized for its procurements. The logs shall list the commodity/service being procured, total dollar value of the procured item(s), waiver date, authorizing official, basis for waiver, and USAID actions that can promote metrication and lessen the need for future waivers.          (3) Within 30 days of the closing of each fiscal year, each USAID/W procurement activity and each Mission will submit a copy of the metric waiver log for the year to the USAID Metric Executive. (Mission logs are to be consolidated in a Mission report for the procurement activity and for the nonprocurement activities maintaining such logs under the USAID Metric Transition Plan.) Repetitive purchases of commercially produced and marketed items and classes of items may be consolidated in reporting procurements that do not exceed $10,000 cumulatively during the reporting period.711.002-71 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.       The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 752.211–70 in all USAID-direct solicitations and contracts.
Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 57 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 1 of 9
Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 57 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 2 of 9
Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 57 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 3 of 9
Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 57 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 4 of 9
Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 57 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 5 of 9
Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 57 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 6 of 9
Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 57 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 7 of 9
Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 57 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 8 of 9
Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 57 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 9 of 9
#### Calogero Grillo, Respondent, v. Fischbach-Moore, Incorporated, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Judgment in favor of plaintiff for personal injuries in the sum of $34,000 unanimously reversed on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs and without disbursements, and a new trial granted unless plaintiff, within 20 days of service upon him by defendant Fischbaeh-Moore, Incorporated of a copy of the order entered herein, stipulates to accept $20,000, in lieu of the award by verdict, in which event the judgment is modified to that extent and as thus modified, affirmed, without costs or disbursements. It is obvious that the award by verdict of $34,000 is excessive and not supported by the record. Concur — Eager, J. P., Capozzoli, McGivern, Nunez and Steuer, JJ.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 96 (Wednesday, May 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 28730]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-12175]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the District of Columbia 
Advisory Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a meeting of the 
District of Columbia Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene 
at 12 p.m. (EDT) on Wednesday, June 1, 2011, at Commission 
headquarters, 624 9th Street, NW., 5th floor conference room, 
Washington, DC 20425. The purpose of the meeting is for project 
planning.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments; the 
comments must be received in the regional office within 30 days of the 
meeting. Written comments may be mailed to the Eastern Regional Office, 
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 624 9th Street, NW., Suite 740, 
Washington, DC 20425. They may also be faxed to (202) 376-7548, or e-
mailed to ero@usccr.gov. Persons who desire additional information 
should contact the Eastern Regional Office at (202) 376-7533.
    Records generated from this this meeting may be inspected and 
reproduced at the Eastern Regional Office, as they become available, 
both before and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of 
this advisory committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, 
http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Eastern Regional Office at the 
above e-mail or street address.
    Deaf or hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting(s) and 
require the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the 
Eastern Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the 
scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, on May 13, 2011.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2011-12175 Filed 5-17-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
1649.002-70 Applicability of the FAR to FEHB acquisitions.       (a) Termination of FEHB contracts because of withdrawal of approval is controlled by 5 U.S.C. 8902(e) and 5 CFR 890.204.          (b) Termination of FEHB contracts because of nonrenewal of the contract at the end of the contract term is controlled by 5 U.S.C. 8902(a) and 5 CFR 890.205.          (c) The procedures for settlement of contracts after they are terminated shall be those contained in FAR part 49.    **Parent topic:** PART 1649—TERMINATION OF CONTRACTS
616.506-70 DOSAR contract clause.       The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 652.216–70, Ordering—Indefinite-Delivery Contract, whenever the clause at FAR 52.216–20, Definite Quantity, or the clause at FAR 52.216–21, Requirements, or the clause at FAR 52.216–22, Indefinite Quantity, is used.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 616.5—Indefinite-Delivery Contracts
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           3,024
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,567
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,775
<INVENTORY>                                      3,169
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                51,395
<PP&E>                                          16,362
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,244
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 124,884
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,823
<BONDS>                                         43,199
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         27
<COMMON>                                           120
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,420
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   124,884
<SALES>                                         36,309
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,309
<CGS>                                           20,487
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,280
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   191
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 863
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,863
<INCOME-TAX>                                       708
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,155
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,155
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10
        

</TABLE>
§ 97.100 Examination of applications. ( a ) [Reserved]
( b ) Examinations of applications shall include a review of all available documents, publications, or other material relating to varieties of the species involved in the application, except that if there are fundamental defects in the application, as determined by the examiner, the examination may be limited to an identification of such defects and notification to the applicant of needed corrective action. However, matters of form or procedure need not, but may, be raised by an examiner until a variety is found to be new, distinct, uniform, and stable and entitled to protection.
[58 FR 42435, Aug. 9, 1993, as amended at 60 FR 17189, Apr. 4, 1995]
### NUMBER 13

- 1 7

- 00 556

- CR



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

MANSU LAU KNOX JR.

, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

.

On appeal from the 2 7 th District Court

of Bell County, Texas

.

NUMBER 13

- 1 7

- 00 570

- CR



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG2



### MANSU LAU KNOX JR., Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

.

On appeal from the 426 th District Court

of Bell County, Texas

.



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Contreras and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Benavides

Appellant, Mansu Lau Knox Jr. , attempts to appeal conviction s for burglary of a

habitation

– attempted and burglary of a building

. 1 The trial court has certified that this

“ is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal, ” and “ the defendant

has waived the right of appeal. ” See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(a)(2).

On October 19, 2017 , this Court notified appellant ’ s counsel of the trial court ’ s

certification s and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether

appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel ’ s findings

as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to th e

existence of any amended certification s

.

Counsel failed to respond to this Court’s order and the Court abated the appeal s

on December 1, 2017. On December 8, 2017 , counsel filed a letter brief with this Court.

1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Third Court of Appeals in Austin pursuant to a

docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See T EX . G OV ' T C ODE A NN . § 73.001

(West , Westlaw through 2017 R.S. ).3

Accordingly, th e case s are hereby REINSTAT ED. Counsel ’ s response does not

establish that the certification s currently on file with this Court are incorrect or that

appellant otherwise has a right to appeal.

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed

if the t rial court ’ s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d); see T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, th ese appeal s

are DISMISSED.

GINA M. BENAVIDES

, Justice

Do not publish.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed the

4th day of January, 2018

.
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 15 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 15 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 15 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 3 of 3