alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
img181755292_0.jpg
     780 Township Line Road  Yardley, PA 19067609-883-3900


Re: Servicer Compliance Statement

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Cenlar FSB, as servicer (“the Servicer”) pursuant to applicable servicing agreements governing the securities listed in Exhibit A, does certify that:

1. A review of the Servicer’s activities during the period of 1/1/2023 to 12/31/2023 (the “Reporting Period”) and of the Servicer’s performance under the applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision; and


2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.


The undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 5th day of March 2024.

img181755292_1.jpg

David C. Schneider President

Cenlar FSB

Mailing Address:Cenlar FSB  425 Phillips Boulevard  Ewing, NJ 08618


---

img181755292_2.jpg








Exhibit A – Securities Covered in Cenlar’s Servicer Compliance Statement



|         |                                      |             |                                    |                       
|-------- | ------------------------------------ | ----------- | ---------------------------------- | ----------------------
|Investor | Servicer                             | Security    | * Period Subserviced by Cenlar FSB | Security Administrator
|RW0      | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp | SEMT 2012-6 | 1/1 thru 12/31/23                  | Citibank              
|RW2      | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp | SEMT 2013-2 | 1/1 thru 12/31/23                  | Citibank              
|RW3      | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp | SEMT 2013-3 | 1/1 thru 12/31/23                  | Citibank              
|RW4      | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp | SEMT 2013-4 | 1/1 thru 12/31/23                  | Citibank              
|RW5      | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp | SEMT 2013-5 | 1/1 thru 12/31/23                  | Citibank              
|RW6      | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp | SEMT 2013-6 | 1/1 thru 12/31/23                  | Citibank              
|RW7      | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp | SEMT 2013-7 | 1/1 thru 12/31/23                  | Citibank              
|RW8      | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp | SEMT 2013-8 | 1/1 thru 12/31/23                  | Citibank              






---
§ 958.47 Research and development. ( a ) The committee with the approval of the Secretary, may establish or provide for the establishment of projects involving production research, marketing research and development projects, and marketing promotion including paid advertising, designed to assist, improve, or promote the marketing, distribution, consumption or efficient production of onions. Any such project for the promotion and advertising of onions may utilize an identifying mark which shall be made available for use by all handlers in accordance with such terms and conditions as the committee, with the approval of the Secretary, may prescribe. The expenses of such projects shall be paid from funds collected pursuant to § 958.42 or § 958.46.
( b ) In recommending projects pursuant to this section the committee shall give consideration to the following: ( 1 ) The expected supply of onions in relation to market requirements;
( 2 ) The supply situation among competing areas and commodities;
( 3 ) The anticipated benefits from such projects in relation to their costs;
( 4 ) The need for marketing research with respect to any market development activity; and
( 5 ) The need for a coordinated effort with USDA's Food Marketing Alert or other similar programs.
( c ) If the committee should conclude that a program of research or development should be undertaken, or continued, in any crop year, it shall submit the following for the approval of the Secretary: ( 1 ) Its recommendations as to the funds to be obtained pursuant to § 958.42 or § 958.46;
( 2 ) Its recommendation as to any research projects; and
( 3 ) Its recommendation as to promotion activity and paid advertising.
( d ) Upon conclusion of each activity, but at least annually, the committee shall summarize and report the results of such activity to its members and to the Secretary.
[41 FR 36196, Aug. 27, 1976]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Thomas, Appellant.

Submitted September 4, 2007;

decided September 6, 2007

Reported below, 35 AD3d 192.

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Robert S. Dean, Esq., Center for Appellate Litigation, 74 Trinity Place, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10006 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus D ismiss ed and Memorandum Opinion filed

Octo ber 1 , 2013.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 13

- 00828

- CV

IN RE LARRY CANTU , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS County Court at Law # 4 and Probate Court

Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CI048941



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

On September 20, 2013, relator Larry Cantu filed a petition for writ of
mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Brazoria County District Clerk to provide him a reporter’s record at no cost for use in a civil appeal pending in this court

.2

A c ourt of appeals has the authority to issue writs of mandamus against a judge of a district or county court in the court of appeals’ district and all writs necessary to enforce its jurisdiction. Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221(b). For a
district clerk to co me within our jurisdictional reach, it must be established that the issuance of the writ of mandamus is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. In re
Coronado , 980 S.W. 2d 691, 692 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1998, orig. proceeding).

Relator has not shown that the exercise of our mandamus authority is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. Therefore, we have no authority to issue a writ of mandamus agai n st the Brazoria County District Clerk

. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is ordered dis missed for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of C h i e f Justice Frost a n d J u s t i c e s Boyce and Jamison.
Exhibit 32





Certification


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted


Pursuant to Section 906 of the


Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of ChinaNet Online Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           the Report fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Handong Cheng


Name: Handong Cheng


Title:  Chief Executive Officer


March 31, 2011




/s/ Zhige Zhang


Name: Zhige Zhang


Title:  Chief Financial Officer


March 31, 2011




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and will be furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.  This exhibit is not “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 but is instead furnished as provided by applicable rules of the SEC.
#### § 987.26 Vacancies.

In the event of any vacancy occasioned by the failure to qualify, declination to serve, removal, resignation, disqualification, or death of any person nominated to serve on the Committee, or any member or alternate member selected by the Secretary, the Committee shall promptly submit its recommendation to the Secretary of a nominee eligible to serve in accordance with the requirements specified for the group in § 987.21. If the vacancy is for a member position, the Committee shall recommend appointment of the alternate member if that person is willing to serve in that position. If the Committee's recommendation is not submitted within 30 calendar days after such vacancy occurs, the Secretary may fill such vacancy without regard to nominations, and the selection shall be made on the basis of representation provided in § 987.21.

[43 FR 4251, Feb. 1, 1978]
Skip to main content

X

###           No Data Available        

Please visit the  for a list of cities with data.Please search for a U.S. location, or visit the International navigation tab.

X

###           Data Courtesy Of        

## No Location Selected

AirNow

About AirNowHow to use this siteAirNow PartnersList of PartnersFor PartnersFAQsContact UsAnnouncementsAbout the data

AQI & Health

Air Quality Index (AQI)AQI BasicsOzoneUsing the Air Quality IndexParticle PollutionAQI CalculatorsAction DaysAir Quality and HealthActivity GuidesYour HealthAsthma and Heart DiseaseHealth ProfessionalsAir Quality Awareness Week (EPA)

Fires

WildfiresFire and Smoke MapUsing AirNow During WildfiresSmoke AdvisoriesFires and Health

Maps & Data

Interactive MapNational MapsFire and Smoke MapUsing AirNow During WildfiresInformation by statePast DataBy CityBy MonitorU.S. Embassies & ConsulatesAirDataAirCompareDevelopers/APIAirNow Mobile App

Education

Air Quality Flag ProgramAir Quality Flag Program (En Español)What You Can DoInformation for:TeachersStudentsHealth Professionals

U.S. Embassies and ConsulatesCanadaMexico

AirNow Mobile AppEnviroFlash emailsAir SensorsWeb CamsDevelopers/APICustom AirNow Maps WidgetsPublicationsPublications (en español)Air Quality VideosSite Map

Recursos en español

Arrow pointing from Alerts Popup to the Tool button

⨯

# System Alerts

https://www.airnow.gov/alert/4801

## Wildfire Smoke in Multiple States

### 2023-08-01

Wildfire smoke continues to impact air quality in multiple states. Please use the Fire and Smoke map to check on wildfire smoke impacts in your area.

View All (1)

Arrow pointing from Announcements Popup to the Tool button

⨯

# Announcements

https://www.airnow.gov/announcement/4806

## Fire and Smoke Map Version 4 Now Available

### 2024-09-05

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Forest Service are pleased to bring you this updated AirNow Fire and Smoke Map, with even more information you can use to protect yourself from wildland fire smoke. This new version features an updated display that allows you to get a quick glance at information, tailored user interfaces for both desktop and mobile, and faster loading. Learn more about the Fire and Smoke Map.

https://www.airnow.gov/announcement/5494

## Updated AQI for Particle Pollution Now in Effect

### 2024-05-06

AirNow products now reflect the updated Air Quality Index for fine particle pollution. Learn more about the AQI updates.

View All (2)

AQI

AirNow.gov

#       	Air Quality Index - A Guide to Air Quality and Your Health    	

This booklet explains EPA's Air Quality Index (AQI) and the health effects of major air pollutants.

You may need a PDF reader to view files on this page. See EPA’s About PDF page to learn more.

## **Air Quality Index - A Guide to Air Quality and Your Health**

 

AirNow.gov - Home of the U.S. Air Quality Index

HomeSite MapContact UsAccessibility

AirNow.gov - Home of the U.S. Air Quality Index

HomeSite MapContact UsAccessibility
**CERTIFICATIONS

**Exhibit 31.1  **Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 **CERTIFICATIONS
I, George W. Hamlin, IV, certify that: 
1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Canandaigua National Corporation; 
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 
4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  
(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosures controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  
(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  
(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 
5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  
(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to  record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  
(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

 

May 7, 2004 
/s/ George W. Hamlin, IV
Date 
George W. Hamlin, IV, President and  
Chief Executive Officer********
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Pettiford, Appellant.

Appeal from judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered December 12,1977, convicting defendant of manslaughter in the first degree and sentencing him to a term of 8 1/3 to 25 years, held in abeyance, and the matter remanded for a reopened *Huntley*hearing on the legality of defendant’s arrest and the admissibility of his two inculpatory statements. Contrary to the suppression court’s finding, it is clear that defendant was in custody at the time he gave his first statement, which was exculpatory. Defendant had not, prior to this statement, been given his constitutional warnings by the detective who elicited the statement. Despite its finding that defendant was not in custody, the court nonetheless directed the People not to use this statement on their direct case, although the court found this statement and the two inculpatory statements which followed it to be voluntary and therefore competent for use at trial to impeach defendant. Finding that defendant had been advised of his rights and had knowingly and intelligently waived these rights, the court further ruled that the two subsequent inculpatory statements were admissible. Citing doctrine enunciated in *Westover v United States*(384 US 436,494-497) defendant now contends that the suppression court should have suppressed not only the initial exculpatory statement but the two inculpatory statements as well, since they were a continuation of tainted questioning. Under such circumstances the Supreme Court has found that “an intelligent waiver of constitutional rights cannot be assumed” (p 496). Although the defendant pressed Fifth and Sixth Amendment claims, he did not raise this issue at the hearing. Nor did he press his present claim that all three statements *824must be suppressed as the direct product of an illegal, sham arrest. Thus, the People were never afforded the opportunity to confront these claims. Ordinarily, the failure to advance a particular claim at the suppression hearing, where the People would have an opportunity to meet such an assertion, should bar the raising of that issue on appeal. (See *People v Tutt,*38 NY2d 1011.) Though the *Westover*issue was never urged by defendant in his arguments, we remand since it was clearly an issue demonstrated by the People’s own proof and within the ambit of defendant’s Fifth and Sixth Amendment claims. By the same token, the People, if timely put on notice of this issue, might have been in a position to offer proof that the *Miranda*warnings had been administered approximately four hours earlier that day by an officer who arrested him on an unrelated narcotics charge or that after a definite pronounced break in the interrogation he was given subsequent warnings sufficient to protect his rights. (See *People v Chapple,*38 NY2d 112.) Thus, the circumstances of defendant’s initial arrest for a narcotics violation and the course of his interrogation throughout the day of his arrest become significant. We remand accordingly and hold the appeal in abeyance. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Lupiano, Silverman and Yesawich, JJ.
52.247-34 F.o.b. Destination.

As prescribed in 47.303-6(c), insert the following clause:

F.o.b. Destination (Nov 1991)

(a) The term "f.o.b. destination," as used in this clause, means-

(1) Free of expense to the Government, on board the carrier’s conveyance, at a specified delivery

point where the consignee’s facility (plant, warehouse, store, lot, or other location to which shipment

can be made) is located; and

(2) Supplies shall be delivered to the destination consignee’s wharf (if destination is a port city and

supplies are for export), warehouse unloading platform, or receiving dock, at the expense of the

Contractor. The Government shall not be liable for any delivery, storage, demurrage, accessorial, or

other charges involved before the actual delivery (or "constructive placement" as defined in carrier

tariffs) of the supplies to the destination, unless such charges are caused by an act or order of the

Government acting in its contractual capacity. If rail carrier is used, supplies shall be delivered to

the specified unloading platform of the consignee. If motor carrier (including "piggyback") is used,

supplies shall be delivered to truck tailgate at the unloading platform of the consignee, except when

the supplies delivered meet the requirements of Item568 of the National Motor Freight

Classification for "heavy or bulky freight." When supplies meeting the requirements of the

referenced Item568 are delivered, unloading (including movement to the tailgate) shall be

performed by the consignee, with assistance from the truck driver, if requested. If the contractor

uses rail carrier or freight forwarded for less than carload shipments, the contractor shall ensure

that the carrier will furnish tailgate delivery, when required, if transfer to truck is required to

complete delivery to consignee.

(b) The Contractor shall-

(1)

(i) Pack and mark the shipment to comply with contract specifications; or

(ii) In the absence of specifications, prepare the shipment in conformance with carrier requirements;

(2) Prepare and distribute commercial bills of lading;

(3) Deliver the shipment in good order and condition to the point of delivery specified in the

contract;

(4) Be responsible for any loss of and/or damage to the goods occurring before receipt of the

shipment by the consignee at the delivery point specified in the contract;

(5) Furnish a delivery schedule and designate the mode of delivering carrier; and

(6) Pay and bear all charges to the specified point of delivery.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.247 [Reserved]
# Subpart 1424.1 - Protection of Individual Privacy

**Parent topic:**PART 1424 - PROTECTION OF PRIVACY AND FREEDOM OF INFORMATION

## 1424.102 General.

Procedures for implementing the Privacy Act of 1974 and Departmental regulations under 43 CFR part 2, subpart D, are contained in 383 DM.   

## 1424.103 Procedures.

When required by FAR 24.103(b)(2), the CO shall provide the contractor with a copy of the Department's Privacy Act regulations codified in 43 CFR part 2, subpart D.   

## 1424.104 Contract clauses.

The clause at FAR 52.224-1, Privacy Act Notification, as prescribed in FAR 24.104(a), shall be supplemented in accordance with 1452.224-1.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
Angeles Income Properties, Ltd. IV 1998 First Quarter 10-QSB
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000763049
<NAME> ANGELES INCOME PROPERTIES, LTD. IV
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998   
<CASH>                                           3,756
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          23,456
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,833   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,874   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         15,180     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0     
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         457    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,874    
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,157    
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   809    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 378    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (30)     
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.22)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
2944.302 Requirements.

The authority of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management under FAR 44.302(a),

to raise or lower the $25 million review level for a contractor's purchasing system, may not be

delegated. When a contractor's purchasing system review is required by the contracting officer, the

effort must be coordinated with the OASAM Business Operations Center's Division of Acquisition

Management Services and the Division of Cost Determination.

Parent topic: Subpart 2944.3 - Contractors' Purchasing Systems Reviews