alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 985.57 Reserve pool requirements. ( a ) On November 1, or such other date as the Committee, with the approval of the Secretary may establish, the Committee shall pool identified excess oil as reserve oil in such manner as to accurately account for its receipt, storage, and disposition. The Committee shall store reserve oil for the account of the producer and maintain the identity of the reserve oil by producer's name, the year produced, the class of oil, and such other identification as may be used in normal commercial trade practices. The Committee shall designate a Committee employee as reserve pool manager.
( b ) *Disposition.* ( 1 ) When, in any marketing year, a producer has produced less than the annual allotment of a class of oil, the producer may, upon notification of the Committee, fill the deficiency with the same class of reserve oil from the producer's prior production.
( 2 ) Prior to March 15 of any year, or such other date as recommended by the Committee and approved by the Secretary, a producer may notify the Committee of a possible deficiency in the producer's ensuing year's production of oil and wishes to use reserve oil from own production to fill the ensuing year's annual allotment. The Committee shall approve the producer's request if the oil is still available at the time of the request.
( 3 ) Under supervision of the Committee, a producer may exchange salable oil for the same class and quantity of reserve oil from own production so long as the oil is properly identified.
( 4 ) When the Committee finds that additional oil is needed to fill the normal market demand, it shall offer all or a portion of the reserve oil for sale to handlers. Offers to sell, extension of offers and withdrawal of offers shall be subject to disapproval by the Secretary. The Committee may establish rules and regulations governing the offers and sale to handlers.
( 5 ) The Committee may use reserve oil for market development projects approved by the Secretary. Such projects may be conducted by the Committee or in conjunction with or through handlers.
( c ) *Pool expenses and proceeds.* Expenses incurred by the Committee in handling and storing reserve oil shall be paid by the equity holders. The proceeds from the disposition of reserve oil shall be distributed, after deduction of any expenses incurred by the Committee in receiving, handling, storing, and disposing thereof, to the equity holders or their successors in interest, on the basis of the number of pounds, class of oil and quality credited to each equity holder's account in the pool. A full accounting to each equity holder, or successor in interest, in each reserve pool shall be made by the Committee annually.
§ 1008.23 Public notice of systems of records. ( a ) The DOE shall publish in the Federal Register at least annually a notice of the existence and character of each of its systems of records, which notice shall include: ( 1 ) The name and location of the system;
( 2 ) The categories of individuals on whom records are maintained in the system;
( 3 ) The categories of records maintained in the system;
( 4 ) Each routine use of the records contained in the system, including the categories of users and the purpose of such use, subject to paragraph (d) of this section;
( 5 ) The policies and practices of the DOE regarding storage, retrievability, access controls, retention, and disposal of the records;
( 6 ) The title and business address of the DOE official who is responsible for the system of records;
( 7 ) The DOE procedures whereby an individual can be notified at his request if the system of records contains a record pertaining to him;
( 8 ) The DOE procedures whereby an individual can be notified at his request about how he can gain access to any record pertaining to him contained in the system or records, and how he can contest its content; and
( 9 ) The categories of source of records in the systems.
( b ) Notwithstanding the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section, the notice of systems of records shall not necessarily include the information in paragraphs (a) (7) through (9) of this section if DOE has claimed a general or specific exemption from the requirements of the Act, as provided in § 1008.12.
( c ) Copies of the notices as printed in the Federal Register shall be available at the DOE locations listed at § 1008.2(c). Requests by mail for copies of such notices should be sent to Privacy Act Officer, Headquarters, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC. 20585. The first copy will be furnished free of charge. For each additional copy, the costs of printing and handling may be charged.
( d ) DOE shall publish in the Federal Register notice of any new routine use or intended routine use of a record in the system of records, at least 30 calendar days prior to the implementation of any new routine use of a record in a system of records, or at least 30 calendar days prior to publication of the annual notice of such routine uses, as provided in paragraph (a) of this section, an opportunity for interested persons to submit written comments consisting of data, views, or arguments regarding such use to DOE, shall be provided.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

PROGRESSIVE AM. INS. CO., )

 )

Plaintiff, )

 ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv717-ID

v. )

 )

CAROL THORN, et al., )

 )

Defendants. )

ORDER

Upon CONSIDERATION of Plaintiff Progressive American Insurance Co.’s

motion to extend time for service upon Defendants, filed December 13, 2006 (Doc. No.

21), and for good cause shown, it is ORDERED that said motion be and the same is

hereby GRANTED and that the time for Plaintiff to perfect service on Defendants be and

the same is hereby EXTENDED to and including March 9, 2007.

DONE this 14 day of December, 2006. th

 /s/ Ira DeMent 

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 22 Filed 12/14/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### § 966.26 Selection.

The Secretary shall select initially 3 members of the committee with their respective alternates, from each district.
Subpart 414.2 - Solicitation of Bids

Parent topic: PART 414 - SEALED BIDDING

414.201 Preparation of invitations for bids.

414.201-6 Solicitation provision.

The contracting officer shall insert the provision 452.214-70, Award by Lot, when multiple items are

segregated into clearly identifiable lots and the contracting officer wants to reserve the right to

award by item within a lot, if award in that manner would be advantageous to the Government.
#### § 958.83 Duration of immunities.

The benefits, privileges, and immunities conferred upon any person by virtue of this subpart shall cease upon the termination of this subpart, except with respect to acts done under and during the existence of this subpart.
Case 2:06-cv-00719-WKW-WC Document 4 Filed 09/05/2006 Page 1 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00719-WKW-WC Document 4 Filed 09/05/2006 Page 2 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00719-WKW-WC Document 4 Filed 09/05/2006 Page 3 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00719-WKW-WC Document 4 Filed 09/05/2006 Page 4 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00719-WKW-WC Document 4 Filed 09/05/2006 Page 5 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00719-WKW-WC Document 4 Filed 09/05/2006 Page 6 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00719-WKW-WC Document 4 Filed 09/05/2006 Page 7 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00719-WKW-WC Document 4 Filed 09/05/2006 Page 8 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00719-WKW-WC Document 4 Filed 09/05/2006 Page 9 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00719-WKW-WC Document 4 Filed 09/05/2006 Page 10 of 10
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

WILLIAM D. BOWDEN, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

 )

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv665-WHA

 ) 

MISSION PETROLEUM CARRIERS, et al., )

 )

Defendants. )

ORDER

Due to a conflict which has arisen in the court’s calendar, the trial of this case previously

scheduled to begin July 9, 2007, is RESET to begin during the term commencing July 17, 2007. 

All deadlines governed by the trial date shall be determined by this new date. All other dates set

out in the Uniform Scheduling Order shall remain in full force and effect.

DONE this 26th day of October, 2006.

/s/ W. Harold Albritton 

W. HAROLD ALBRITTON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 14 Filed 10/26/2006 Page 1 of 1
222 So.2d 883

#### COMMERCIAL CREDIT CORPORATION v. Carl SHIPP, Jr.

No. 49805.

June 9, 1969.

In re: Louise Stevens Shipp applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Franklin. 220 So.2d 735.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, the result is correct.
2007-2431.

#### Calhoun et al. v. Harner.

Allen App. No. 1-06-97, 2007-Ohio-6025. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. Upon consideration of the joint application for dismissal,

It is ordered by the court that the application for dismissal is granted. Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.
#### § 985.62 Verification of reports and records.

For the purpose of assuring compliance with record keeping requirements and verifying reports filed by producers and handlers, the Secretary and the Committee, through its duly authorized employees, shall have access to any premises where applicable records are maintained, where oil is received or held, and at any time during reasonable business hours, shall be permitted to inspect such handlers' premises, and any and all records of such handlers with respect to matters within the purview of this part.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

M.C., who sues by and through her )

mother and next friend, GAIL TATUM, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv83-LES

) (LEAD CASE)

PACTIV CORPORATION, et al, )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

On July 12, 2006, the court ordered the following cases consolidated for all pretrial

proceedings governed by FED. R. CIV. P. 26 through 27. 

2:06cv83-LES, M.C. v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv84-LES, Phillips v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv85-LES, Thompson v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv86-LES, Edwards v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv186-LES, Madden v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv187-LES, Davis v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv188-LES, Douglas v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv189-LES, Thompson v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv190-LES, Kelley v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv191-LES, Cravey v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

See Doc. # 59. 

Since that date, mediation has been unsuccessful and the following additional cases have

been filed. 

2:06cv660-LES, Adams, et al., v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv679-LES, Cassady, et al. v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv680-LES, Brooks, et al. v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv739-LES, Anderson et al., v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv757-LES, Harrison, et al., v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv758-LES, Lawrence, et al., v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

Case 2:06-cv-00680-LES-CSC Document 10 Filed 10/19/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

2:06cv759-LES, Hamilton v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv904-LES, K.C. et al., v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

At this juncture, it appears that all of these cases should be consolidated for all pretrial

proceedings; provided, however, that at a later date, the court may unconsolidate these cases

should it become necessary. Accordingly, for good cause, it is

ORDERED that the afore-referenced cases be and are hereby CONSOLIDATED for all

pretrial proceedings. It is further

ORDERED that the above-styled case be and is hereby DESIGNATED as LEAD case,

and that all pleadings shall be filed only in the lead case.

The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to docket and place a copy of this order in each

case file referenced herein.

Counsel are reminded of M.D. ALA. LR 5.1 which governs the filing of discovery

materials in this district.

Done this 19 day of October, 2006. th

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00680-LES-CSC Document 10 Filed 10/19/2006 Page 2 of 2
IV 

House Calendar No. 249 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1100 

[Report No. 109–723] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6406) to modify temporarily 

certain rates of duty and make other technical amendments to the 

trade laws, to extend certain trade preference programs, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 7, 2006 

Mr. DREIER, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6406) to modify 

temporarily certain rates of duty and make other technical amendments to the trade laws, to extend certain 

trade preference programs, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order without intervention of any point of 

3 order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 6406) to 

4 modify temporarily certain rates of duty and make other 

5 technical amendments to the trade laws, to extend certain 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

HRES 1100 RH 

1 trade preference programs, and for other purposes. The 

2 bill shall be considered as read. The previous question 

3 shall be considered as ordered on the bill to final passage 

4 without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate 

5 equally divided and controlled by the chairman and rank6 ing minority member of the Committee on Ways and 

7 Means; and (2) one motion to recommit. 

8 SEC. 2. In the engrossment of the House amendment 

9 to the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 6111) to amend 

10 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the 

11 Tax Court may review claims for equitable innocent 

12 spouse relief and to suspend the running on the period 

13 of limitations while such claims are pending, the Clerk 

14 shall— 

15 (1) add the text of H.R. 6406, as passed by the 

16 House, as new matter at the end of such engross17 ment; 

18 (2) assign appropriate designations to provi19 sions within the engrossment; and 

20 (3) conform provisions for short titles within 

21 the engrossment. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS

ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 249 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1100 

[Report No. 109

–723] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6406) 

grams, and for other purposes. laws, to extend certain trade preference promake other technical amendments to the trade to modify temporarily certain rates of duty and 

DECEMBER 7, 2006 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
1

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT

OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

Deloise Price, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2: 06 cv721-MHT

 )

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., )

Extreme Performance, Inc., )

)

Defendants. )

MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL

Plaintiff files this motion to continue the trial of this case, set for November 26, 2007,

and states:

1. The undersigned counsel needs a continuance of this case due to a personal health

care issue.

2. The undersigned has been undergoing diagnostic treatment and tests for the past

two weeks concerning a health condition. Two days ago, the undersigned was informed by his

surgeon that surgery is required and needed to be scheduled soon. The surgery will interfere

with the trial of this case as the undersigned would like to have it scheduled immediately after

the Thanksgiving Holiday, which is the same time as the beginning of the trial of this case. 

3. The undersigned has spoken with Dennis Bailey, counsel for Defendants, who has

graciously agreed to consent to a continuance. However, due to trial conflicts, Mr. Bailey

requested that the trial of this case be reset sometime after March of 2008. The Plaintiff has no

objection to that request.

Case 2:06-cv-00721-MHT-TFM Document 42 Filed 11/14/2007 Page 1 of 3
2

4. The undersigned is lead trial counsel for the Plaintiff, having attended every

deposition and hearing in this case. It is important that the undersigned try this case for the

Plaintiff. 

5. This case has not been previously continued at the request of any party. A

continuance would work no prejudice on any party. 

6. The undersigned apologizes for having to make this request and for

inconveniencing the Court. It was not anticipated.

Wherefore, the Plaintiff prays for a continuance of the trial of this case.

Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ Brian P. Strength

JOCK M. SMITH (SMIO47)

BRIAN P. STRENGTH (STR052)

Attorneys for Plaintiff

OF COUNSEL:

COCHRAN, CHERRY, GIVENS & SMITH

Post Office Box 830419

Tuskegee, Alabama 36083

Tel: (334) 727-0060

Fax: (334) 727-7197

Case 2:06-cv-00721-MHT-TFM Document 42 Filed 11/14/2007 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have served a copy of the foregoing upon counsel listed below by

electronic notification on this the 14 day of November, 2007; th

Dennis Bailey

Rushton, Stakely, Johnston & Garrett, P.A.

P.O. Box 270

Montgomery, AL 36101

/s/ Brian P. Strength

OF COUNSEL

Case 2:06-cv-00721-MHT-TFM Document 42 Filed 11/14/2007 Page 3 of 3
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21A0494. ADRIAN ANTHONY JOHNSON v. THE STATE.

In 2019, Adrian Anthony Johnson was arrested and charged with cruelty to

children. In May 2020, Johnson filed a pro se motion to dismissthe indictment, which

the trial court denied and dismissed on the ground that Johnson was represented by

counsel. In June 2020, Johnson, again appearing pro se, filed a “Motion for

Immediate Release By and Through State of Emergency.” The trial court denied his

request, and Johnson filed his pro se notice of appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction.

“A criminal defendant in Georgia does not have the right to represent himself

and also be represented by an attorney, and pro se filings by represented parties are

therefore unauthorized and without effect.” Tolbert v. Toole, 296 Ga. 357, 363 (3)

(767 SE2d 24) (2014) (punctuation omitted). Here, Johnson is represented bycounsel.

There is nothing in the record indicating that the attorney either withdrew or was

relieved from representation.1 Under these circumstances, Johnson’s pro se notice of

appeal is a nullity. See Soberanis v. State, 345 Ga. App. 403, 405 (812 SE2d 800)

(2018). For this reason, the appeal is DISMISSED. See id.

1

Johnson has since filed a motion to recuse his attorney, but nothing in the

record on appeal indicates that the attorney has been relieved from representing

Johnson.

November 12, 2020
The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send a copy of this order to Johnson and

to his attorney, and the latter also is DIRECTED to send a copy to Johnson.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

11/12/2020
NUMBER 13-17-00556-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

MANSU LAU KNOX JR., Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 27th District Court 

of Bell County, Texas.

NUMBER 13-17-00570-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
2

MANSU LAU KNOX JR., Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 426th District Court 

of Bell County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Contreras and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Benavides

Appellant, Mansu Lau Knox Jr., attempts to appeal convictions for burglary of a 

habitation – attempted and burglary of a building.

1

 The trial court has certified that this 

“is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal,” and “the defendant 

has waived the right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).

On October 19, 2017, this Court notified appellant’s counsel of the trial court’s 

certifications and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether 

appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s findings 

as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the 

existence of any amended certifications.

Counsel failed to respond to this Court’s order and the Court abated the appeals

on December 1, 2017. On December 8, 2017, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. 

 

1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Third Court of Appeals in Austin pursuant to a 

docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 73.001 

(West, Westlaw through 2017 R.S.). 
3

Accordingly, the cases are hereby REINSTATED. Counsel’s response does not 

establish that the certifications currently on file with this Court are incorrect or that 

appellant otherwise has a right to appeal. 

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed 

if the trial court’s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); see TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, these appeals 

are DISMISSED. 

GINA M. BENAVIDES,

Justice

Do not publish. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

4th day of January, 2018.
Editorial Note on Subpart A of Part 989
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 989 appear at 83 FR 53973, Oct. 26, 2018.

§ 989.60 Exemption. ( a ) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this amended subpart, the Committee may establish, with the approval of the Secretary, such rules and procedures as may be necessary to permit the acquisition and disposition of any off-grade raisins, free from any or all regulations, for uses in non-normal outlets.
( b ) The Committee may establish, with the approval of the Secretary, such rules and procedures as may be necessary to exempt from any or all regulations raisins produced in southern California (i.e., the counties of Riverside, Imperial, San Bernardino, Ventura, Orange, Los Angeles, and San Diego) and disposed of for distillation, livestock feed, or by export in natural condition to Mexico.
( c ) The Committee may designate such raisins as it deems appropriate for production, processing, and marketing research and development. The period of such designation shall be for not more than five years unless extended by the Committee. The volume which may be acquired by all handlers shall not exceed 500 natural condition tons annually for each designated project, unless increased by the Secretary upon a recommendation of the Committee. Such designated raisins may be acquired and disposed of free from those regulations specified by the Committee. In any crop year, when the total industry acquisitions of the designated raisins exceed 500 natural condition tons or a larger quantity approved by the Secretary upon a recommendation of the Committee, the exemption shall not apply.
[29 FR 9484, July 11, 1964, as amended at 32 FR 18086, Dec. 19, 1967; 37 FR 19623, Sept. 21, 1972; 42 FR 37202, July 20, 1977; 83 FR 53971, Oct. 26, 2018]