alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 983.6 Assessed weight.

*Assessed weight* means pounds of inshell pistachios, with the weight computed at 5 percent moisture, received for processing by a handler within each production year: *Provided,* That for loose kernels, the actual weight shall be multiplied by two to obtain an inshell weight; *Provided further,* That the assessed weight may be based upon quality requirements for inshell pistachios that may be recommended by the Committee and approved by the Secretary.

[74 FR 56539, Nov. 2, 2009]
Mercury case-study TSD 

 Bill Maxwell 

 to: Cortney_Higgins 

 03/21/2011 05:04 PM 

 Cc: Karen Thundiyil, Charlotte Bertrand 

 Bcc: Lydia Wegman, Bryan Hubbell, RobertJ Wayland, Peter Tsirigotis 

 

Cortney -- 

As we discussed last week. 

Thanks. 

Hg Case Study Memo and TSD - 3-16-11.pdf 

Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt

Bill Maxwell 

Energy Strategies Group 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

U.S. EPA Mail Code D243-01 

109 T.W. Alexander Drive 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

Phone: 919-541-5430 

FAX: 919-541-5450
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE 3 MONTHS AND ENDED MARCH 22, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       1,007,820
<SECURITIES>                                 9,415,151
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,973,560
<PP&E>                                       1,932,405
<DEPRECIATION>                               (478,993)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              26,278,333
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          815,875
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,490
<COMMON>                                        37,384
<OTHER-SE>                                  25,403,228
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                26,278,333
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               101,786
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,072,746
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               459,004
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,429,964)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,029,964)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,429,964)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.7)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.7)


</TABLE>
§ 959.42 Assessments. ( a ) The funds to cover the committee's expenses shall be acquired by the levying of assessments upon handlers as provided in this subpart. Each handler who first handles onions, which are regulated under this part, shall pay assessments to the committee upon demand, which assessments shall be in payment of such handler's pro rata share of the committee's expenses.
( b ) Assessments shall be levied upon handlers at rates established by the Secretary. Such rates may be established upon the basis of the committee's recommendations and other available information. Such rates may be applied to specified containers used in the production area.
( c ) At any time during, or subsequent to, a given fiscal period the committee may recommend the approval of an amended budget and an increase in the rate of assessment. Upon the basis of such recommendations, or other available information, the Secretary may approve an amended budget and increase the rate of assessment. Such increase shall be applicable to all onions which were regulated under this part and which were handled by the first handlers thereof during such fiscal period.
( d ) The payment of assessments for the maintenance and functioning of the committee may be required under this part throughout the period it is in effect irrespective of whether particular provisions thereof are suspended or become inoperative.
( e ) If a handler does not pay assessments within the time prescribed by the committee, the assessment may be increased by a late payment charge and/or an interest rate charge at amounts prescribed by the committee with approval of the Secretary.
[26 FR 704, Jan. 25, 1961, as amended at 73 FR 10976, Feb. 29, 2008]
#### § 932.24 Noncanning use.

*Noncanning use* means the use of olives other than in the production of canned ripe olives, and is the authorized outlet for undersize olives and the limited use size olives which, pursuant to § 932.52(b), are not permitted for limited use in any crop year in which limited use is restricted to less than the available quantity of limited use size olives.

[36 FR 20356, Oct. 21, 1971]
156 So.2d 799

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Noble CAREY.

No. 46985.

Oct. 29, 1963.

In re: State of Louisiana applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writs granted. The ruling of the trial judge is annulled and set aside at this time. Due to the exigencies of the cas.e,. the jury having been empaneled and sworn, and the first witness called and sworn, the trial judge is ordered to overrule the objection as to the sufficiency of the opening statement and proceed with the trial, reserving to the defendant the right to urge this particular issue in the event of a conviction, by properly reserved bills of exception.
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 3504

AN ACT

To amend the Public Health Service Act to prohibit the

solicitation or acceptance of tissue from fetuses gestated

for research purposes, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fetus Farming Prohi5 bition Act of 2006’’.
 †

2

S 3504 ES

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF THE SOLICITATION OR ACCEPT2 ANCE OF TISSUE FROM FETUSES GESTATED

3 FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES.

4 Section 498B of the Public Health Service Act (42

5 U.S.C. 289g–2) is amended—

6 (1) by redesignating subsections (c) and (d) as

7 subsections (d) and (e), respectively;

8 (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the fol9 lowing:

10 ‘‘(c) SOLICITATION OR ACCEPTANCE OF TISSUE

11 FROM FETUSES GESTATED FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES.—

12 It shall be unlawful for any person or entity involved or

13 engaged in interstate commerce to—

14 ‘‘(1) solicit or knowingly acquire, receive, or ac15 cept a donation of human fetal tissue knowing that

16 a human pregnancy was deliberately initiated to pro17 vide such tissue; or

18 ‘‘(2) knowingly acquire, receive, or accept tissue

19 or cells obtained from a human embryo or fetus that

20 was gestated in the uterus of a nonhuman animal.’’;

21 (3) in paragraph (1) of subsection (d), as so re22 designated, by striking ‘‘(a) or (b)’’ and inserting

23 ‘‘(a), (b), or (c)’’; and
†

3

S 3504 ES

1 (4) in paragraph (1) of subsection (e), as so re2 designated, by striking ‘‘section 498A(f)’’ and insert3 ing ‘‘section 498A(g)’’.

Passed the Senate July 18, 2006.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 3504

AN ACT

To amend the Public Health Service Act to prohibit

other purposes.fetuses gestated for research purposes, and forthe solicitation or acceptance of tissue from
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3313 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3313

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain color monitors video with a 
                display diagonal of 35.56 cm or greater.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 26, 2006

  Mr. Schumer (for himself and Mrs. Clinton) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on certain color monitors video with a 
                display diagonal of 35.56 cm or greater.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COLOR MONITORS WITH A VIDEO DISPLAY DIAGONAL OF 35.56 CM OR 
              GREATER.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.85.29        Color monitors, with a  Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           video display                                                     31/2009          ''
                           diagonal of 35.56 cm                                                                .
                           or greater, of a kind
                           used as analog
                           display devices in
                           video security
                           systems (provided for
                           in subheading
                           8528.21.39)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
###### Editorial Note on Subpart A of Part 989

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 989 appear at 83 FR 53973, Oct. 26, 2018.

#### § 989.39 Compensation and expenses.

The members and alternate members of the Committee shall serve without compensation, but shall be allowed their necessary expenses as approved by the Committee.

[54 FR 34137, Aug. 18, 1989]
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Child DevelopmentCurriculum DevelopmentElementary Secondary EducationEqual EducationModelsMulticultural EducationMultiracial PersonsProfessional DevelopmentRacial DifferencesRacial IdentificationSelf ConceptTeacher AttitudesTeacher RoleTeaching MethodsUrban Youth

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
# 705.002 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**PART 705—PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONS
252.215-7004 Requirement for Submission of Data Other Than Certified Cost or Pricing Data—Modifications—Canadian Commercial Corporation.       As prescribed at                 215.408             (2)(ii), use the following clause:          REQUIREMENT FOR SUBMISSION OF DATA OTHER THAN CERTIFIED COST OR PRICING DATA—MODIFICATIONS—CANADIAN COMMERCIAL CORPORATION (OCT 2013)          This clause, in lieu of FAR 52.215-21, applies only if award is to the Canadian Commercial Corporation.          (a)  Submission of certified cost or pricing data is not required.          (b)  Canadian Commercial Corporation shall obtain and provide the following for  modifications that exceed the $150,000 [*or higher dollar value specified by the U.S. Contracting Officer in the solicitation*].          (i)  Profit rate or fee (as applicable).          (ii)  Analysis provided by Public Works and Government Services Canada to the Canadian Commercial Corporation to determine a fair and reasonable price (comparable to the analysis required at FAR 15.404-1).          (iii)  Data other than certified cost or pricing data necessary to permit a determination by the U.S. Contracting Officer that the proposed price is fair and reasonable [*U.S. Contracting Officer to insert description of the data required in accordance with FAR 15.403-3(a)(1)*].          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 252.215 RESERVED
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Milton Rosenblitt, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Decision affirmed, without costs. (See *Matter of Bernstein*[Com], 278 App. Div. 625, affd. 303 N. Y. 755; *Matter of Vick*[Catherwood], 12 A D 2d 120; *Matter of Salisbury*[Catherwood], 27 A D 2d 587.) Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-30080

Conference Calendar

 

VEREL TRACY WESTOVER, SR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

LINDA JOHNSON ET. AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

---------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 97-CV-1611

---------------------

August 18, 1998

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Verel Tracy Westover, Sr., appeals the district court’s

dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint with prejudice under

42 U.S.C. § 1915(e) as frivolous and for failure to state a claim

upon which relief may be granted. Westover contends that prison

officials were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical

needs. We have reviewed the record and Westover’s brief and

DISMISS for essentially the same reasons adopted by the district 
No. 98-30080

- 2 -

court. Westover v. Johnson, No. 97-1611 (W.D. La. Dec. 15,

1997). 

To the extent that Westover raises a separate claim for

“assault and battery,” for the first time on appeal, this claim,

does not rise to the level of plain error. See Robertson v.

Plano City of Texas, 70 F.3d 21, 23 (5th Cir. 1995). 

Westover’s appeal is without merit and therefore frivolous. 

See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). 

Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R.

42.2. We caution Westover that any additional frivolous appeals

filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of

sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Westover is further cautioned to

review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise

arguments that are frivolous. 

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
1 Kelly, Shaheerah

From: Kelly, Shaheerah

Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 9:42 AM

To: Ora V. Marek-Martinez

Cc: tbillie@navajo-nsn.gov; tbegay@navajo-nsn.gov; Kelly, Shaheerah

Subject: RE: NHPA Consultation for McElmo Creek Unit Flare



### Good Morning Ora,

Thank you for your response. I just sent you a meeting invitation for this Friday, Sept 11 at 10

am MDT (9 am PDT)

. I also invited Tamara Billie and Timothy Begay since I was previously

discussed the project with them. Please contact me if you have any questions. Thank you.

************************************

Shaheerah Kelly

Permits Office, Air Division (AIR-3)

U.S. Environmental Protec tion Agency, Region 9

San Francisco, CA 94105

Phone: 415-947-4156

Fax: 415-947-3579

Email: kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov

From: Ora V. Marek

‐ Martinez [mailto:oramm@navajo

‐ nsn.gov]

Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 8:03 AM

To: Kelly, Shaheerah

Subject: RE: NHPA Consultation for McElmo Creek Unit Flare

Hello,

Thank you for the notification. I apologize for not responding sooner, however, I was out of the office. Incidentally, I

have an all

‐ day meeting today, would you have time to discuss this project on Friday around 10am?

Best,

Ora

Ora Marek-Martinez, PhD

Navajo Nation Tribal Historic Preservation Officer

Historic Preservation Department

PO Box 4950

Window Rock, AZ 86515

Ph: (928) 871-7198

Fx: (928) 871-7886

From: Kelly, Shaheerah [ mailto:Kelly.Shaheerah@epa.gov ]

Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 1:33 PM2 To: Tamara Billie; Ora V. Marek-Martinez; Timothy Begay

Cc: Kelly, Shaheerah

Subject: NHPA Consultation for McElmo Creek Unit Flare

Good Afternoon,

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 9 is processing a federal Clean Air Act air

quality permit for the McElmo Creek Unit (MCU) Flare. The undertaking triggering consultation under the

National Historic Preservation (NHPA) is the issuance of this Clean Air Act permit. The EPA is the lead federal

agency, and only agency, involved in this undertaking.

Other than the potential installation of a variable speed fan on the Flare, EPA’s undertaking does not authorize

any new construction or modification of existing equipment at the MCU Facility. The undertaking results in no

new surface disturbance or change in operations and therefore will have no effect on eligible historic

properties located within 2 km area of potential effects for the Flare.

I would appreciate talking to you this week or early next week about this action before sending you official

documentation to initiate the NHPA consultation. Please let me know if you are available at the following

times to discuss this action:

10:00 am MST, Thurs, 9/3

10:00 am MST, Fri, 9/4

10:00 am MST, Mon, 9/7

10:00 am MST, Tues, 9/8

I look forward to your response.

Thank you.

************************************

Shaheerah Kelly

Permits Office, Air Division (AIR-3)

U.S. Environmental Protec tion Agency, Region 9

San Francisco, CA 94105

Phone: 415-947-4156

Fax: 415-947-3579

Email: kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.20
JBG SMITH Properties


Amendment No. 1


to the
 
2017 Employee Share Purchase Plan
 
(As approved by the sole shareholder on July 10, 2017)
The 2017 Employee Share Purchase Plan of JBG SMITH Properties, effective July 17, 2017 (the “ESPP”), is hereby amended as follows, effective January 1, 2018:
1.The second sentence of Section 15 of the ESPP is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 


Each employee agrees, by participating in the Plan, that Shares purchased under the Plan must be held for at least twelve (12) months from the applicable Exercise Date.
#### § 945.8 Handler.

*Handler* is synonymous with shipper and means any person (except a common or contract carrier of potatoes owned by another person) who ships potatoes.
###### Editorial Note on Part 982

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 61 FR 17559, Apr. 22, 1996.

#### § 982.454 Sureties acceptable to the Board.

Bonds secured by cash, cashier's or certified checks, or by assets that are entirely separate and apart from the handler named in the bond may be accepted by the Board pursuant to § 982.54(a). As a condition of accepting any surety, the Board may require such financial statements or other information relating to the ability of such surety to guarantee a handler's bond as it deems necessary. Handlers are also required to submit F/H Form C to the Board to document the handler's execution of a bond.

[54 FR 46721, Nov. 7, 1989]
§ 1013.9 Answer. ( a ) The defendant may request a hearing by filing an answer with the reviewing official within 30 days of service of the complaint. An answer shall be deemed to be a request for hearing.
( b ) In the answer, the defendant— ( 1 ) Shall admit or deny each of the allegations of liability made in the complaint;
( 2 ) Shall state any defense on which the defendant intends to rely;
( 3 ) May state any reasons why the defendant contends that the penalties and assessments should be less than the statutory maximum; and
( 4 ) Shall state the name, address, and telephone number of the person authorized by the defendant to act as defendant's representative, if any.
( c ) If the defendant is unable to file an answer meeting the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section within the time provided, the defendant may, before the expiration of 30 days from service of the complaint, file with the reviewing official a general answer denying liability and requesting a hearing, and a request for an extension of time within which to file an answer meeting the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section. The reviewing offical shall file promptly with the ALJ the complaint, the general answer denying liability, and the request for an extension of time as provided in § 1013.11 of this part. For good cause shown, the ALJ may grant the defendant up to 30 additional days within which to file an answer meeting the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section.
#### § 966.122 Reports.

Each handler handling tomatoes under and pursuant to a Certificate of Privilege shall supply the committee with a report thereon within the time specified on the application for such certificate showing the name and address of the shipper, car or truck identification, loading point, destination, consignee, and, when inspection is required, the Federal-State Inspection Certificate number.
1407.307 Appeals.

Department appeal procedures required by OMB Circular A-76 are codified in 43 CFR part 4,

subpart M.

Parent topic: Subpart 1407.3 - Contractor Versus Government Performance
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CHRISTINE BENNETT, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.:

v ) 1:06-CV-723-MHT

)

ARMY FLEET SUPPORT, LLC )

)

)

Defendant. )

CONFLICT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

COMES NOW, Christine Bennett, a Plaintiff in the above-referenced lawsuit, and in

accordance with the Order of this Court, making the following disclosure concerning parent

companies, subsidiaries, partners, limited liability entity members, and managers, trustees ( not

beneficiaries of trusts), affiliates, or other similar entities reportable under the provisions of the

Middle District of Alabama’s General Order No. 3047:

There are no such entities to be reported.

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Ethan R. Dettling

Jon C. Goldfarb

Ethan R. Dettling

Counsel for Plaintiff

OF COUNSEL:

WIGGINS, CHILDS, QUINN & PANTAZIS, LLC

The Kress Building

301 19th Street North

Birmingham, Alabama

Telephone No.: (205) 314-0500

Facsimile No.: (205) 254-1500

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 42 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 1 of 2
I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document has

been properly filed with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system which will automatically

send electronic notification to the following counsel of record:

Kirk Cordell Shaw

Mary Carol Ladd

Ambrecht Jackson LLP

P.O. Box 290

Mobile, AL 36601-0290

Telephone No.: 251-405-1302

Facsimile No.: 251-432-6843

on this the 6th day of July, 2007.

s/ Ethan R. Dettling

OF COUNSEL

Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 42 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 2 of 2
Subpart 1312.3 - Solicitation Provisions and

Contract Clauses for the Acquisition of

Commercial Items

Parent topic: PART 1312 - ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL ITEMS

1312.302 Tailoring of provisions and clauses for the

acquisition of commercial items.

The authority for approving a request for waiver to tailor a clause, or otherwise include any

additional terms or conditions in a solicitation or contract in a manner that is inconsistent with

customary commercial practice, is set forth in CAM 1301.70.