alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
p.1 

OAR Box 1778 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

165) ll-E-16 

Docket Number: 

A-90-06 

Printed 10/28/2008 9:50:59 AM Sheet 165 of 276 
CONVERSATION RECO II-E-16 

,i U 

ll** 

TYPE 

Q VISIT 

Location of Visit/Conferenct: 

Q CONFERENCE TELEPHONE 

• INCOMING 

|ff OUTGOING 

NAME OF PERSON'S) CONTACTED OR IN CONTACT 

WITH YOU /VU V k Xr r iin^«vj ; [J\<\ <2\jt {I <\ f \SJ 

? aJiS^v^Lp", Toart-ajCaiSAiA^ T.-vVt-le-^in t 

ORGANIZATION (Office, dept.. bureau, 

etc.) 

TELEPHONE NO* 

(lj|^2»|-2/aX 7 

SUBJECT 

w^-f<i o — p0 -A y/^A'ii-vfl"t»tv 

ROUTING 

NAME/SYMBOL 

Va>*/1«.Wt4)3 1 ^ 

\ cviX f «-

•firo f • I J 

^t= U a-r 

£*.*_ 

INT 

SUMMARY 

H?7l?P pH>poi^L'V'^'"t" /H-Vt>goV . We_o^klr>^- 7 -V-U ~ hs^y^y'f f--.-H i •'Jy- « / ~fo 

WAa W J •Ml 

I) rA-^ j a + W.*« . -rc^k r -\^ ^ a <w ^ 7 •'eA bv, wefco 

f j _<-,.••, V Wlo^'wi | \V^ \ vJj J kjuyu~y rtvl c -\-vfii> ^ 

G,) Fallo w 0^ ^ "\ ^ OaT-lL ste^* ^ prtrJ'^»-Jk— l i r+\\zJ*~e«J 

rj\ e«.V--V>_( jL i" O^voilyi ^ O A ? /*\ C a-* f •' "-J -

X 

-T- -tW i r <taffYska.^XZb<v. 

^ 

-HASH V IV&^V */>J*J noJUyy \ T ° \-^oJ*-c\. "Vf/r ? JUJJIUNVIL "fo >- dU^,"xi 

ito4U4vjt>v^ 

V/v VAJIV-.' 

L

4t 

(Dy^ JLjt!^<.y»>a. HI*M—i«^--»»^--fvjYu.T7JL c^/^ -

<*-«^i n^r v VAAF- I >o<i 

«* _„—_^ ,_->_ ,+*—.— rU i-U{ 

? 

Q v ( v«-tx_ o T i 'a-'A_ov-. Va* cy"^v*Ajut> , \ ray t* YJ v**-*^ vnv-tw . v —-*« "v>u *. • -j • - — 

^nA^a- t o J » * ± t»»axk. "t-o UJ* r w nit/??. 

ACTION REQUIRED ., Er TiHT i v_ .... . ^-^v-*aL \\\ffl*t 

Hr 

f.EQU.RED^. ^ H Q ^ L^f^V-, >»».*-•«. )»Vo\ 

NAME OF PERSON DOCUMENTING CONVERSATION 

^av-,L ScWVACTION TAKEN 

. \ 1 ^ • 

SIGNATURE 

v-.v.A 

TITLE ^ DATE 

5O271-.01 U.S.G.PO - 19SS -4il-275V:o:Q2 , CONVERSATION RECORD OPTIONAL roRM 271 (12-76) 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

P.2 

IN 

o£ 

LL
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3458 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3458

To require the Consumer Product Safety Commission to issue regulations 
mandating child-resistant closures on all portable gasoline containers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 7, 2006

 Mr. Bayh (for himself and Mrs. Boxer) introduced the following bill; 
    which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Consumer Product Safety Commission to issue regulations 
mandating child-resistant closures on all portable gasoline containers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Children's Gasoline Burn Prevention 
Act''.

SEC. 2. CHILD-RESISTANT PORTABLE GASOLINE CONTAINERS.

    (a) Consumer Product Safety Standard.--Within 180 days after the 
date of enactment of this Act, the Consumer Product Safety Commission 
shall promulgate, as final consumer product safety standards under 
section 9 of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2058), child-
resistance standards for closures on all portable gasoline containers. 
Such standards shall be substantially the same as the standard ASTM 
F2517-05, issued by ASTM International, or any successor standard 
issued by ASTM International.
    (b) Application of Certain Promulgation Requirements.--The 
requirements of subsections (a) through (f) of section 9 of the 
Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2058(a) through (f)) shall not 
apply to the consumer product safety standards required by subsection 
(a) of this section.
    (c) Definition.--As used in this Act, the term ``portable gasoline 
container'' means a portable gasoline container intended for use by 
consumers.
    (d) Effective Date.--The consumer product safety standard required 
by subsection (a) shall take effect on the date that is 6 months after 
the date on which such standard shall be promulgated.
    (e) Report.--Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Consumer Product Safety Commission shall transmit to the 
Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives and 
the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a 
report on--
            (1) the degree of industry compliance with the standard 
        promulgated under subsection (a);
            (2) any enforcement actions brought by the Commission to 
        enforce such standard; and
            (3) incidents involving children interacting with portable 
        gasoline containers (including both those that are and are not 
        in compliance with the standard promulgated under subsection 
        (a)).
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

EASTERN DIVISION 

CLIFFORD ALSTON, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Civil Action No.: 

 ) 3:06 CV 722 WKW-DRB 

CHRISTOPHER ASKEW, et al., ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY

 Comes now the Plaintiff by and through counsel of record, and requests this 

Honorable Court to enter an Order compelling the Defendant, Christopher Askew to 

respond to Plaintiff’s Interrogatories and Request for Production previously filed in this case 

and shows unto the Court the following: 

1. Plaintiff filed Interrogatories and Request for Production to the Defendant, 

Christopher Askew. 

2. Defendant, Christopher Askew filed General Objections to Plaintiff’s 

Interrogatories and Request for Production. 

3. Pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff’s counsel wrote to 

Defendant’s counsel on two occasions asking him to reconsider his general 

objections and conducted two telephone conferences with Defendant’s 

counsel to try and resolve the issue without requesting the court assistance. 

(See Exhibit A) 

4. However, to date, the Defendant, Christopher Askew has failed to properly 

respond to the Plaintiff’s Interrogatories and Request for Production. 

Case 3:06-cv-00722-WKW-TFM Document 16 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 1 of 2
 WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests this Honorable Court to enter an Order compelling 

the Defendant, Christopher Askew to answer said discovery within twenty (20) days. 

s/Christopher D. Glover________

Christopher D. Glover 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

OF COUNSEL: 

HOGAN AND GLOVER, P.C. 

2017 Morris Avenue, Suite 300 

Birmingham, AL 35203 

205-327-5235 

Fax: 205-327-5237 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that on this the 21st day of May, 2007, I have electronically filed 

the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send 

notification of such filing to the following: 

Keri Donald Simms 

Miller, Hamilton, Snider & Odom 

505 North 20th Street, Suite 500 

Birmingham, AL 35203 

 s/Christopher D. Glover

 OF COUNSEL 

2

Case 3:06-cv-00722-WKW-TFM Document 16 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-00722-WKW-TFM Document 16-2 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-00722-WKW-TFM Document 16-2 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3270 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3270

             To extend the duty suspension on MUB 738 INT.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 26, 2006

Mr. Frist (for Mrs. Dole) introduced the following bill; which was read 
             twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To extend the duty suspension on MUB 738 INT.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MUB 738 INT.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.32.91 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to MUB 738 INT) is amended by 
striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 20 Filed 11/16/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 20 Filed 11/16/2006 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 20-2 Filed 11/16/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 20-3 Filed 11/16/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 20-3 Filed 11/16/2006 Page 2 of 2
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

DELOISE PRICE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv721-MHT

) 

WAL-MART STORES, INC., and )

EXTREME PERFORMANCE, INC., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the notice of withdrawal (doc. no.

19) is treated as a motion to withdraw and said motion is

granted.

DONE, this the 8th day of January, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00721-MHT-TFM Document 20 Filed 01/08/2007 Page 1 of 1
# L_2014111EN.01009601.xml

| 15.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 111/96 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 111/96

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 368/2014 of 10 April 2014 amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 establishing the Community list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Community

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 108 of 11 April 2014
  )

On page 33, in the signature:

for:

‘Joaquín ALMUNIA
  ’,

read:

‘Siim KALLAS
  ’.

---
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

DERON L. BARNETT, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv725-MHT

) 

REGIONS BANK, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

This cause is now before the court on plaintiff's

motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis (doc. no.

16).

28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) provides that "[a]n appeal may

not be taken in forma pauperis if the trial court

certifies in writing that it is not taken in good faith."

In making this determination as to good faith, a court

must use an objective standard, such as whether the

appeal is "frivolous," Coppedge v. United States, 369

U.S. 438, 445 (1962), or "has no substantive merit."

United States v. Bottoson, 644 F.2d 1174, 1176 (5th Cir.

Case 2:06-cv-00725-MHT-CSC Document 17 Filed 10/27/2006 Page 1 of 2
Unit B May 15, 1981) (per curiam), cert. denied, 454 U.S.

903 (1981); see also Rudolph v. Allen, 666 F.2d 519, 520

(11th Cir. 1982) (per curiam), cert. denied, 457 U.S.

1122 (1982); Morris v. Ross, 663 F.2d 1032 (11th Cir.

1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1010 (1982). Applying this

standard, this court is of the opinion, for the reasons

stated in the recommendation of the magistrate judge,

that the plaintiff's appeal is without a legal or factual

basis and, accordingly, is frivolous and not taken in

good faith. See, e.g., Rudolph v. Allen, supra; Brown v.

Pena, 441 F. Supp. 1382 (S.D. Fla. 1977), aff'd without

opinion 589 F.2d 1113 (5th Cir. 1979).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the plaintiff's

motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis be and it

is hereby denied; and that the appeal in this cause be

and it is hereby certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(a), as not taken in good faith.

DONE, this the 27th day of October, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00725-MHT-CSC Document 17 Filed 10/27/2006 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the December
31, 1996 financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          31,734
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  358,686
<ALLOWANCES>                                   337,493
<INVENTORY>                                  1,212,501
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,244,165
<PP&E>                                       1,327,496
<DEPRECIATION>                                 145,070
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,303,558
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,982,824
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,955
<COMMON>                                        23,538
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,293,241
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,303,558
<SALES>                                      1,344,539
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,344,539
<CGS>                                          715,367
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  715,367
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,695
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (4,705,080)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (4,705,080)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (4,705,080)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.25)
        

</TABLE>
EGAN SYSTEMS, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

Computation of per share earnings:

The following data show the amounts used in computing earnings per share and the
effect on (loss) income and the weighted average number of shares of dilutive
potential common stock.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    Nine Months Ended
                                                                      SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                                2000               1999
                                                                ----               ----


<S>                                                        <C>                 <C>
(Loss) income available to common stockholders             $   (429,945)       $   139,348
                                                           ============        ===========

Weighted average number of common shares in
 primary EPS                                                 19,368,874         18,646,652

Effect of dilutive securities                                   200,000          4,682,642
                                                           ------------        ------------
Weighted average number of common shares and
 dilutive potential common stock used in
 fully diluted EPS                                           19,568,874        $23,329,294
                                                           ============        ===========

Net (loss) income per common share:

 Basic                                                     $      (0.02)       $      0.01
                                                           ============        ===========

 Fully diluted                                             $    -              $      0.01
                                                           ============        ===========
</TABLE>

For 2000, the effect of dilutive securities were not included in computing fully
diluted EPS because their effects are anti-dilutive.


                                       10
643.104-70 DOSAR contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 652.243–70, Notices, in all solicitations and

contracts exceeding the micro-purchase threshold which are awarded and/or performed overseas.

Parent topic: Subpart 643.1—General
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE 
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Xuedong Hu, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Alpha Spacecom, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

(c)

presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

(b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



|September 24, 2003 | /s/ Xuedong Hu

Name:  Xuedong Hu
Title:  Chief Executive Officer
|------------------ | -----------------------------------------------------------------
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 17 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 1 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 17 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 2 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 17 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 3 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 17 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 4 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 17 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 5 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 17 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 6 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 17 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 7 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 17-2 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 1 of 1
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 349 

To provide for the appointment of additional judges for the district of New 

Mexico. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 10, 2005 

Mr. DOMENICI introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide for the appointment of additional judges for the 

district of New Mexico. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL JUDGES FOR THE DISTRICT OF 

4 NEW MEXICO. 

5 (a) PERMANENT DISTRICT JUDGESHIPS.— 

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—The President shall appoint, 

7 by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, 

8 2 additional district judges for the district of New 

9 Mexico. 
2 

•S 349 IS

1 (2) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMEND2 MENT.—The table under section 133(a) of title 28, 

3 United States Code, is amended by striking the item 

4 relating to New Mexico and inserting the following: 

‘‘New Mexico ............................................................................................. 8.’’. 

5 (b) TEMPORARY JUDGESHIP.— 

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—The President shall appoint, 

7 by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, 

8 1 additional district judge for the district of New 

9 Mexico. 

10 (2) VACANCY NOT FILLED.—The first vacancy 

11 in the office of district judge in the district of New 

12 Mexico occurring 10 years or more after the con13 firmation date of the judge named to fill the tem14 porary district judgeship created by this subsection, 

15 shall not be filled. 

Æ
#### National Education Products, Inc., Respondent-Appellant, v. Educational Reading Aids Corp. et al., Appellants-Respondents.

Order entered January 20, 1970, granting stay of proceedings pending arbitration and granting preliminary injunction in favor of plaintiff, unanimously modified on the law and the facts to the extent that the (first decretal paragraph granting plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction is deleted, and otherwise affirmed, with $30 costs and disbursements to defendants-appellants-respondents. The arbitration clause in the prime contract has already been invoked. In addition to that protection, plaintiff has not shown irreparable injury suffered or reasonably to be expected and it appears it has an adequate remedy at law for damages. On this submission -plaintiff has not shown clear proof of a breach of contract or demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence the likelihood of prevailing. Defendant on the other hand at least has developed a plausible thesis of possible grounds for invoking paragraph nine of the main contract. Moreover, upon all of the questions in the case there are claims and charges each against the other which make it impossible to forecast the outcome of the litigation. Lacking the essential elements entitling plaintiff to the extraordinary remedy of preliminary injunction, the motion for the same must be denied. *{Kakalios*v. *Mesemch,*259 App. Div. 112; *Morrin*v. *Structural Steel Bd. of Trade,*231 App. Div. 673; *Elk St. Market Corp.*v. *Rothenberg,*233 App. Div. 243.) Other questions raised are not reached. Concur — McGivern, J. P., Markewich, Steuer and Bastow, JJ.