alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                       1,281,548
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      26,113,072
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,958,807
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,797,291
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          923,432
<BONDS>                                      6,165,136
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,708,723
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,797,291
<SALES>                                        947,444
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               959,156
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  454,309
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               307,742
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             119,642
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 77,463
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             77,463
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    77,463
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

DAVID WILLIAM REEKS,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 17

- 30177

D.C. No. 1:17

- cr

- 00022

- SPW

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 12, 2018 **

Before: RAWLINSON, CLIFTON, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges

.

David William Reeks appeals from the district cou rt’s judgment and

challenges the 120

- month sentence imposed following his guilty

- plea conviction

for bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). We have jurisdiction under

28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Accord ingly, Reeks’s

request for oral argument is denied. 

# FILED

JUN 15 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 30177

Reeks argues that the district court placed too much weight on the nature and

circumstances of the offense, and too little weight on his remorse and substance

abuse and mental health issues, resulting in a substantively unreasonable sentence

.

The district court did n ot abuse its discretion. See Gall v. United States , 552 U.S.

38, 51 (2007). The record reflects that the court considered several of the 18

U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors before imposing the sentence. The above

Guidelines sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the section 3553(a)

factors and the totality of the circumstances, including Reeks’s criminal history

and then

- pending state charges. See Gall , 552 U.S. at 51; United States v.

Gutierrez

- Sanchez , 587 F.3d 904, 908 (9th Cir. 2009) (“ The weight to be given the

various [section 3553(a)] factors in a particular case is for the discretion of the

district court.”)

AFFIRMED.
Subpart 1305.2 - Synopses of Proposed

Contract Actions

Parent topic: PART 1305 - PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONS

1305.202 Exceptions.

The designee authorized to decide, in writing, that advance notice through the GPE

(Governmentwide Point of Entry) is not appropriate or reasonable is set forth in CAM 1301.70.
#### In the Matter of Gabby S. Lubin, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Sweeney, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits effective March 29,1969 on the ground that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. The sole question presented on this appeal is whether there is substantial evidence in the record to support the board’s decision. We believe there is. Claimant testified he left his employment because he was not satisfied with the wages or the working conditions, and there is no evidence of any circumstance developing during the course of his six months employment which would have justified his refusal of employment in the first instance. On these facts, we cannot disturb the board’s finding. *(Matter of Pabnieri*[Catherwood], 33 A D 2d 588; *Matter of Sellers [Cather-*wood], 13 A D 2d 204.) Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., Greenblott and Sweeney, JJ., concur in memorandum by Sweeney, J.
Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 120 Filed 10/16/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### Lapis Enterprises, Inc., et al., Appellants, v International Blimpie Corp. et al., Respondents.

In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for fraud and misrepresentation and to cancel a mortgage on real property, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered February 8, 1980, which (1) granted defendant New Jersey Bank, N. A.’s motion to dismiss the complaint as to it, on the basis of lack of jurisdiction, and (2) denied their cross motion for summary judgment as to the remaining defendants. Order modified by deleting therefrom the provision granting defendant New Jersey Bank, N. A.’s motion to dismiss the complaint as to it and substituting therefor a provision denying defendant New Jersey Bank, N. A.’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the basis of lack of jurisdiction. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. In this action, plaintiffs Daniel and Carol Lapidus seek, *inter alia,*to cancel a mortgage on their residence in Nassau County. Defendant New Jersey Bank, N. A., which holds the mortgage as assignee, is a national banking association whose principal place of business is Clifton, New Jersey. As provided in section 94 of title 12 of the United States Code, a suit against a national banking association in a State court may be had *899only “in the county or city in which said association is located having jurisdiction in similar cases”. Though this provision is one of venue, its application to actions against national banking associations in State courts is mandatory *(National Bank v Associates of Obstetrics,*425 US 460; *Mercantile Nat. Bank v Langdeau,*371 US 555). There being no question that defendant New Jersey Bank, N. A., is not located in Nassau County (see *Citizens & Southern Nat. Bank v Bougas,*434 US 35), the only question presented is whether the instant action is local in nature so as to except the application of section 94 of title 12 of the United States Code (see *Casey v Adams,*102 US 66). Since such determination is to be made in accordance with State law (see *Michigan Nat. Bank v Robertson,*372 US 591), we accordingly find that this action, *inter alia,*to cancel a mortgage on real property, is local in nature (see CPLR 507). This result, moreover, should not change because other relief, which may be transitory in nature, is also sought (see *Sterling Commercial Corp. v Bradford,*32 AD2d 952). Consequently, Nassau County is a proper county in which suit against defendant New Jersey Bank, N. A., may be had. As to plaintiffs’ cross motion for summary judgment, there exist a substantial number of triable issues of fact. Damiani, J. P., Cohalan, Hargett and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 40749 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
FRANCISCO PRIETO

- GARCIA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:14

- CR

- 357

- 1

Before DAVIS, JONES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Francisco Prieto

- Garcia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011)

. Prieto

- Garcia has filed a response. We have reviewe d counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein , as well as Prieto

Garcia ’ s response . We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 20, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce Cle rk Case: 15-40749 Document: 00513349829 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/20/2016No. 15

- 40749

2 presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 15-40749 Document: 00513349829 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/20/2016
# Subpart 1531.1 - Applicability [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**PART 1531 - CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES
#### CLARK, Respondent, v. CLARK, Appellant, et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 19, 1914.)

Action by Mary L. Clark against James M. Clark and the Hudson Iron Company.

No opinion. Appeal withdrawn, on condition that within 10 days after the entry of this order the appellant pay the costs and disbursements of said appeal as taxed to each of the respondents; in default thereof, the motion to withdraw the appeal is denied. See, also, 157 App. Div. 929, 142 N. Y. Supp. 1113.
Editorial Note on Part 982
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 61 FR 17559, Apr. 22, 1996.

§ 982.33 Selection and term of office. ( a ) *Selection.* Members and their respective alternates shall be selected by the Secretary from nominees submitted by the Board or from among other qualified persons.
( b ) *Term of office.* The term of office of Board members and their alternates shall be for two years beginning on July 1 and ending on June 30, but they shall serve until their respective successors are selected and have qualified: *Provided,* That no member shall serve more than three consecutive two-year terms as member and no alternate member shall serve more than three consecutive two-year terms as alternate unless specifically exempted by the Secretary. Nomination elections for all Board grower and handler member and alternate positions shall be held every two years.
( c ) The members on the Board shall continue to serve until the new members and alternates have been selected and have qualified.
[51 FR 29547, Aug. 19, 1986, as amended at 61 FR 17559, Apr. 22, 1996; 88 FR 82235, Nov. 24, 2023]
Subpart 1413.2 - Micro-Purchase    **Parent topic:** PART 1413 - SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES1413.201 General.       The procedures set forth in the Federal Supply Schedule for Government-wide Commercial Credit Card Services, Treasury Financial Manual, TFM 4-4500, and “U.S. Department of Interior Handbook for Utilization of Government Wide Commercial Credit Card” issued by PAM contain guidance on using Government-wide purchase card services.1413.202-70 Policy.       (a) The purchase card shall be used in preference to other methods of procurement for purchases up to $3,000. Other small purchase methods (BPAs, imprest funds, third-party drafts, SF-44 forms, and purchase orders) may be used in lieu of the Government purchase card when it is more cost-effective or practicable.          (b) The purchase card shall be issued primarily to personnel outside of procurement offices to purchase products and services up to the micro-purchase threshold ($2,000 for construction).          (c) The purchase card may be used in procurement offices for purchases up to the simplified acquisition threshold ($50,000 if not interim FACNET certified) not to exceed individual warrant limitations.          (d) Each contracting activity shall develop more specific procedures for use of purchase cards.
#### § 986.3 Affiliation.

*Affiliation.* This term normally appears as “affiliate of” or “affiliated with,” and means a person such as a grower or sheller who is: A grower or handler that directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, owns or controls, or is controlled by, or is under common control with the grower or handler specified; or a grower or handler that directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, is connected in a proprietary capacity, or shares the ownership or control of the specified grower or handler with one or more other growers or handlers. As used in this part, the term “control” (including the terms “controlling,” “controlled by,” and “under the common control with”) means the possession, direct or indirect, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of a handler or a grower, whether through voting securities, membership in a cooperative, by contract or otherwise.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3277 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3277

 To suspend temporarily the duty on wide-range high sensitivity color 
                     zoom digital security camera.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 26, 2006

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on wide-range high sensitivity color 
                     zoom digital security camera.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WIDE-RANGE HIGH SENSITIVITY COLOR ZOOM DIGITAL SECURITY 
              CAMERA.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.85.25        Wide-range high         Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           sensitivity high                                                  31/2009          ''
                           resolution color zoom                                                               .
                           digital security
                           camera module with
                           360 viewing radius,
                           progressive recording
                           direct to HDD and
                           custom designed
                           digital signal
                           processor (DSP) chip
                           for automatic focus
                           functions; 380,000 to
                           470,000 pixels image
                           sensor, optical lens
                           zoom power 35x
                           magnification
                           (provided for in
                           subheading
                           8525.30.90)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
1535.007 Solicitations.

(a) Contracting officers shall insert the provision at 48 CFR 1552.235-73, Access to Federal

Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act Confidential Business Information, in all solicitations

when the contracting officer has determined that EPA may furnish the contractor with confidential

business information which EPA had obtained from third parties under the Federal Insecticide,

Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.).

(b) Contracting officers shall insert the provision at 48 CFR 1552.235-75, Access to Toxic Substances

Control Act Confidential Business Information, in all solicitations when the contracting officer has

determined that EPA may furnish the contractor with confidential business information which EPA

had obtained from third parties under the Toxic Substances Control Act (15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.).

(c) Contracting officers shall insert the provision at 48 CFR 1552.235-81, Institutional Oversight of

Life Sciences Dual Use Research of Concern-Representation, when notified in the Advance

Procurement Plan (APP) or by an EPA funding/requesting office, in accordance with the Institutional

Oversight of Life Sciences Dual Use Research of Concern (iDURC) EPA Order 1000.19, Policy and

Procedures for Managing Dual Use Research of Concern, in solicitations that will result in a contract

under which EPA funding will be used by the recipient to conduct or sponsor “life sciences

research”.

Parent topic: PART 1535 - RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 107 (Tuesday, June 4, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 33466]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-13141]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed the Week Ending May 11, 
2013

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the Sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation 
Act, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1382 and 1384) and procedures governing 
proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 
days after the filing of the application.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2013-0098.
    Date Filed: May 8, 2013.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: PTC12 via 3 Memo 0001/22 April 2013.
    Intended Effective Date: 1 June 2013.

Barbara J. Hairston,
Acting Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2013-13141 Filed 6-3-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
Searched for **http://bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/vfluc.pdf**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/vfluc.pdf**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
Subpart 1426.70 [Reserved]

Parent topic: PART 1426 - OTHER SOCIOECONOMIC PROGRAMS
Subpart 1529.4 [Reserved]

Parent topic: PART 1529 - TAXES
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Craig E. Holmes, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Intervoice, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238and 34-47986]; c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: October 12, 2004    /s/ Craig E. Holmes Craig E. Holmes Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

GREAT SOUTHERN WOOD )

PRESERVING, INC., )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06cv708-CSC

)

AMERICAN HOME )

ASSURANCE CO. et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

 Upon consideration of the defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 21),

the plaintiff’s Response (Doc. No. 26), and the defendants’ Reply (Doc. No. 28), it is

ORDERED that this matter be and is hereby set for oral argument on August 3, 2007,

at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 4B, United States Courthouse Complex, One Church Street,

Montgomery, Alabama.

Done this 25th day of July, 2007.

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00708-CSC Document 29 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### § 958.250 Assessment Credit Report.

Each handler may receive a credit for assessments on onions that have been levied in accordance with §§ 958.42 and 958.240 and are subsequently regraded, resorted, or repacked within the production area, or shipped in accordance with § 958.328(e) by furnishing the “Assessment Credit Report” and such other information as required to the committee.

[71 FR 65040, Nov. 7, 2006]