alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

GEORGE D. McCARLEY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 3:06cv663-MHT

) 

CITY OF ROANOKE, etc., )

et al., )

)

Defendants. )

OPINION

Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff filed this

lawsuit claiming various constitutional violations. This

lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of

the United States Magistrate Judge that plaintiff’s case

be dismissed. Also before the court are plaintiff’s

objections to the recommendation. After an independent

and de novo review of the record, the court concludes

that plaintiff’s objections should be overruled and the

magistrate judge’s recommendation adopted.

Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 15 Filed 11/28/2006 Page 1 of 2
An appropriate judgment will be entered.

DONE, this the 28th day of November, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 15 Filed 11/28/2006 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3119 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3119

     To suspend temporarily the duty on exterior emergency lights.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

 Mr. Brownback introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the duty on exterior emergency lights.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTERIOR EMERGENCY LIGHTS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.94.05        Exterior emergency      Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           lights (provided for                                              31/2009          ''
                           in subheading                                                                       .
                           9405.40.60)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1013.19 Prehearing conferences. ( a ) The ALJ may schedule prehearing conferences as appropriate.
( b ) Upon the motion of any party, the ALJ shall schedule at least one prehearing conference at a reasonable time in advance of the hearing.
( c ) The ALJ may use prehearing conferences to discuss the following: ( 1 ) Simplification of the issues;
( 2 ) The necessity or desirability of amendments to the pleadings, including the need for a more definite statement;
( 3 ) Stipulations and admissions of fact or as to the contents and authenticity of documents;
( 4 ) Whether the parties can agree to submission of the case on a stipulated record;
( 5 ) Whether a party chooses to waive appearance at an oral hearing and to submit only documentary evidence (subject to the objection of other parties) and written argument;
( 6 ) Limitation of the number of witnesses);
( 7 ) Scheduling dates for the exchange of witness lists and of proposed exhibits;
( 8 ) Discovery;
( 9 ) The time, date, and place for the hearing; and
( 10 ) Such other matters as may tend to expedite the fair and just disposition of the proceedings.
( d ) The ALJ may issue an order containing all matters agreed upon by the parties or ordered by the ALJ at a prehearing conference.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Frank Bass, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered October 27, 1978, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious grounds which could be raised on this appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see *Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; cf. *People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Gulotta and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
232.001 Definitions.       “Incremental funding” means the partial funding of a contract or an exercised option, with additional funds anticipated to be provided at a later time.    **Parent topic:** Part 232 - CONTRACT FINANCING
52.222-35 Equal Opportunity for Veterans.

As prescribed in 22.1310(a)(1), insert the following clause:

Equal Opportunity for Veterans (Jun 2020)

(a) Definitions. As used in this clause-

"Active duty wartime or campaign badge veteran," "Armed Forces service medal veteran," "disabled

veteran," "protected veteran," "qualified disabled veteran," and "recently separated veteran" have

the meanings given at Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)22.1301.

(b) Equal opportunity clause. The Contractor shall abide by the requirements of the equal

opportunity clause at 41 CFR 60-300.5(a), as of March 24, 2014. This clause prohibits discrimination

against qualified protected veterans, and requires affirmative action by the Contractor to employ

and advance in employment qualified protected veterans.

(c) Subcontracts. The Contractor shall insert the terms of this clause in subcontracts valued at or

above the threshold specified in FAR 22.1303(a) on the date of subcontract award, unless exempted

by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor. The Contractor shall act as specified by

the Director, Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, to enforce the terms, including action

for noncompliance. Such necessary changes in language may be made as shall be appropriate to

identify properly the parties and their undertakings.

(End of clause)

Alternate I (Jul 2014). As prescribed in 22.1310 (a)(2), add the following as a preamble to the clause:

Notice: The following term(s) of this clause are waived for this contract: ______________________ [List

term(s)].

Parent topic: 52.222 [Reserved]
Subpart 1432.1 - Non-Commercial Item Purchase Financing    **Parent topic:** PART 1432 - CONTRACT FINANCING1432.102 Description of contract financing methods.       Use of progress payments based on a percentage or stage of completion are authorized for construction contracts. Progress payments for other than construction, alteration, and repair contracts require the CO to write a determination that:          (a) Payments based on costs would be impracticable; and          (b) Adequate measures exist for determining quality standards and the percentage of work accomplished.
1352.301 Solicitation provisions and contract

clauses (Matrix).





















































Parent topic: Subpart 1352.3 - Provisions and Clauses Matrix
#### Philip Makowsky, Respondent, v New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Appeal Court, Kings County, dated July 12, 1979, dismissed (see *Matter of Aho,*39 NY2d 241, 248). Judgment of the same court, entered August 15, 1979, affirmed. Plaintiff is awarded one bill of costs. Titone, J. P., Mangano, Rabin and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anna Green, Also Known as Anna Jones, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant, as limited by her motion, from an amended sentence of the County Court, Nassau County, imposed October 30, 1978. Amended sentence vacated, on the law, and matter remitted to the County Court for resentencing in accordance herewith. It was error for the County Court to have imposed an indeterminate sentence of three years imprisonment pursuant to subdivision 6 of section 60.03 of the Penal Law for defendant’s violation of the sentence *684of probation imposed on May 19, 1972, upon her conviction of attempted forgery in the second degree committed on January 14, 1971, for the reasons that the crime was committed prior to the effective date of section 60.03 and the defendant had not been adjudicated a drug addict pursuant to the procedures provided for in section 208 of the former Mental Hygiene Law. The matter is, therefore, remitted. Gibbons, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of First Community Financial Corporation, (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Jody D. Graybill,
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.



|                        |  |     |  |                              
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: November 13, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/ Jody D. Graybill         
|                        |  |     |  | Jody D. Graybill,            
|                        |  |     |  | President                    
|                        |  |     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

BARBARA M. JEFFERS and JOAN M. CRAt

Plaintiff, VEC b A Q:

v. CASE NO. 3:06-CV-685-WKW

U

RUSSELL CO BOARD OF EDUCATI L

Defendants,

CONFLICT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

COMES NOW JOAN M. CRAIG ,a 

Plaintiff in the above-Captioned

matter, and in accordance with the order of this Court, making the following disclosure

concerning parent ompanies, subsidiaries, partners, limited liability entity members and

managers, trustees (but not trust beneficiaries), affiliates, or similar entities reportable under

the provisions of the Middle District of Alabama's General Order No. 3047:

This party is an individual, or

E

This party is a governmental entity, or

There are no entities to be reported, or

The following entities and their relationship to the party are hereby reported:

Reportable Entity

Relationship to Party

NONE

W. DON EDDINS

(Counsel's Name)

PLAINTIFFS JEFFERS & CRAIG

Counsel for (print names of all parties)

337 E. MAGNOLIA AVENUE

AUBURN, AL 36830

Address, City, State Zip Code

(334) 821-9981

Telephone Number

Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 34 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I am serving the foregoing document by first class mail upon

the following counsel of record:

Sydney S. Smith, Esq. Matthew C. Williams, Esq.

Smith and Smith Estes, Sanders & Williams, LLC

1503 Broad Street 3800 Colonnade Parkway, Ste. 330

Phenix City, AL 36830 Birmingham, AL 35243

W. Don Eddins (ASB-1424-S65W)

Attorney for Plaintiffs

Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 34 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### § 993.84 Personal liability.

No member or alternate member of the committee, or any employee, representative, or agent thereof shall be held personally responsible, either individually of jointly with others, in any way whatsoever, to any person, for errors in judgment, mistakes, or other acts, either of commission or omission, as such member, alternate member, employee, representative, or agent, except for acts of dishonesty.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Outdoor ChannelHoldings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter endedSeptember 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Perry T. Massie, Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Perry T. Massie     |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| **Perry T. Massie**     |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| February 12, 2007       |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Outdoor Channel Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by OutdoorChannel Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### § 983.85 Duration of immunities.

The benefits, privileges, and immunities conferred upon any person by virtue of this part shall cease upon its termination, except with respect to acts done under and during the existence thereof.

[69 FR 17850, Apr. 4, 2004. Redesignated at 74 FR 56540, Nov. 2, 2009]
2916.000 Scope of part.       This part describes types of contracts that may be used in acquisitions. It further prescribes policies and procedures for implementing contracts.    **Parent topic:** PART 2916 - CONTRACT TYPES
###### Editorial Note on Part 982

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 61 FR 17559, Apr. 22, 1996.

#### § 982.36 Alternates.

An alternate for a member of the Board shall act in the place of the member during such member's absence or, upon the member's death, removal, resignation, or disqualification, until a successor for that member's term has been selected and has qualified.

[51 FR 29548, Aug. 19, 1986]
Exhibit 35.4



|     |  |  |  |                                                                          
|---- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  |  |  | Corporate Trust Services 9062 Old Annapolis
Road Columbia, Maryland 21045

Citibank N.A.

17g-5 Information
Provider

ratingagencynotice@citi.com

RE: Annual Statement
as to Compliance

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Wells Fargo), as Master Servicer,
hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2013 (the Reporting Period):

(a) a review of
Wells Fargos activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement listed on Schedule A hereto (the Servicing Agreement) has been made under my supervision; and

(b) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all
material respects throughout the Reporting Period, except as described on Schedule B hereto.

February 27, 2014



|                      
|----------------------
|/s/ Kristen Ann Cronin
|Kristen Ann Cronin    
|Vice President        
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO



---

Schedule A

Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated November 1, 2012 for Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2012-6, by and among Sequoia Residential Funding, Inc., as Depositor,
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master Servicer and Securities Administrator, and Christiana Trust, a Division of Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, as Trustee.1





|1 | The Pooling and Servicing Agreement was amended and restated effective January 1, 2014 to reflect the resignation of Wells Fargo as the Securities Administrator and Paying Agent (among other roles). See the Form
8-K filed on January 6, 2014 for additional information.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



2



---

Schedule B

None



3
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2965 

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to provide 

duty free treatment for Propylene Glycol Alginates (PGA). 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 23, 2006 

Mr. SANTORUM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 

States to provide duty free treatment for Propylene Glycol Alginates (PGA). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DUTY FREE TREATMENT FOR ALGINIC ACIDS, 

4 ITS SALTS AND ESTERS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subheading 3913.10.0000 of the 

6 Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended in the general subcolumn of column 1 rate of 

8 duty, by striking ‘‘4.2%’’ and inserting ‘‘Free’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies to goods entered or withdrawn from 


dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•S 2965 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the date that is 

2 15 days after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-10465

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

CURTIS ONEAL RHINE,

Defendant - Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:07-CR-183-1

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Proceeding pro se, Curtis Oneal Rhine, federal prisoner # 36888-177,

appeals the district court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a

sentence reduction. He contends the court abused its discretion by: improperly

relying on his alleged participation in the Fish Bowl drug-trafficking ring;failing

to consider the various classes he completed during imprisonment; and refusing

to reduce his sentence in retaliation for his successful appeal in United States v.

Rhine, 583 F.3d 878 (5th Cir. 2009).

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 25, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 12-10465 Document: 00512033360 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/25/2012
No. 12-10465

The district court’s decision whether to reduce a sentence under

§ 3582(c)(2) is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Evans, 587

F.3d 667, 672 (5th Cir. 2009). In considering Rhine’s motion, the district court

was required to, and expressly did, assess the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing

factors. United States v. Doublin, 572 F.3d 235, 237 (5th Cir. 2009). The court

properly considered Rhine’s alleged participation in the Fish Bowl drugtrafficking ring as part of his history under § 3553(a)(1). United States v. Rhine,

637 F.3d 525, 529 (5th Cir. 2011), cert. denied, 132 S. Ct. 1001 (2012). Although

Rhine contends the district court failed to properly consider his post-sentencing

conduct, such consideration is not required. Evans, 587 F.3d at 673 & n.10;

U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10, comment n.1(B)(iii). Rhine’s retaliation claim also fails. 

AFFIRMED.

2

Case: 12-10465 Document: 00512033360 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/25/2012
#### § 93.11 Definitions.

Words used in the regulations in this subpart in the singular form will import the plural, and vice versa, as the case may demand. As used throughout the regulations in this subpart, unless the context requires otherwise, the following terms will be construed to mean:

*Aflatoxin.* A toxic metabolite produced by the molds *Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus parasiticus,* and *Aspergillus nomius.* The aflatoxin compounds fluoresce when viewed under UV light as follows: aflatoxin B1 and derivatives with a blue fluorescence, aflatoxin B2 with a blue-violet fluorescence, aflatoxin G1 with a green fluorescence, aflatoxin G2 with a green-blue fluorescence, aflatoxin M1 with a blue-violet fluorescence, and aflatoxin M2 with a violet fluorescence. These closely related molecular structures are referred to as aflatoxin B1, B2, G1, G2, M1, M2, GM1, B2a, G2a, R0, B3, 1-OCH3B2, and 1-CH3G2.

*Peanut Administrative Committee (PAC).* The committee established under the United States Department of Agriculture Marketing Agreement for Peanuts, 7 CFR part 998, which administers the terms and provisions of this Agreement, including the aflatoxin control program for domestically produced raw peanuts, for peanut shellers. The Peanut Administrative Committee (PAC) headquarters are at 2537 Lafayette Plaza Drive Suite A; Albany, Georgia 31707.

*Peanut Marketing Agreement.* The agreement concerning the regulations and instructions set forth since July 12, 1965, by the Peanut Administrative Committee for the marketing of peanuts entered into by handlers of domestically produced peanuts under the authority of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601 *et seq.*).

*Peanuts.* The seeds of the legume *Arachis* hypogaea, and includes both inshell and shelled nuts.

*Seed.* Any vegetable or other agricultural plant ovule having an embryo that is capable of germinating to produce a plant.

[61 FR 51351, Oct. 2, 1996, as amended at 63 FR 16375, Apr. 2, 1998; 65 FR 64317, Oct. 26, 2000]
Case 2:06-cv-00676-ID-DRB Document 4 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00676-ID-DRB Document 4 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 2 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00676-ID-DRB Document 4 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 3 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00676-ID-DRB Document 4 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 4 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00676-ID-DRB Document 4 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 5 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00676-ID-DRB Document 4 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 6 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00676-ID-DRB Document 4 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 7 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00676-ID-DRB Document 4 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 8 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00676-ID-DRB Document 4 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 9 of 9
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-13-00773-CR

Pablo DUENAS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 371st Judicial District Court, Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1314224D

Honorable Mollee Bennett Westfall, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED June 4, 2014.

_____________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Mineralresources of the Pueblo Mountains Wilderness Study Area, Harney County, Oregon,and Humboldt County, Nevada**** 
SuDocNumber:I19.3:1740-B
ItemNumber: 0620
CGPsystem Number:000594820
 
Report
Plate
 
February26, 2020**
#### In re SLATER.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

December 11, 1914.)

In the matter of the compulsory judicial settlement of the estate of William N. Slater, deceased. (Appeal No. 1.)

No.opinion. Order of the Surrogate’s Court of Westchester County of October 9, 1914, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. See, also, 150 N. Y. Supp. 1112.