[Cite as State ex rel. Steele v. Foley, 2020-Ohio-5128.]

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

 )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

COUNTY OF LORAIN ) 

STATE EX REL. TRACEE STEELE 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

KEITH FOLEY, WARDEN 

 Respondent 

C.A. No. 20CA011675 

ORIGINAL ACTION IN 

HABEAS CORPUS 

Dated: November 2, 2020 

 

 PER CURIAM. 

{¶1} Tracee Steele has petitioned this Court for a writ of habeas corpus to order Warden 

Keith Foley to release him from custody. Warden Foley has moved to dismiss because Mr. Steele 

previously raised the same claim in this Court and in the Ohio Supreme Court, so res judicata 

bars further consideration. Mr. Steele responded to the motion to dismiss. Because Mr. Steele 

failed to comply with the mandatory requirements of R.C. 2969.25(A), this Court must dismiss 

this case. 

{¶2} R.C. 2969.25 sets forth specific filing requirements for inmates who file a civil 

action against a government employee or entity. Warden Foley is a government employee and 

Mr. Steele, incarcerated in the Grafton Reintegration Center, is an inmate. R.C. 2969.21(C) and 

(D). A case must be dismissed if the inmate fails to comply with the mandatory requirements of 

R.C. 2969.25 in the commencement of the action. State ex rel. Graham v. Findlay Mun. Court, 
C.A. No. 20CA011675 

Page 2 of 4 

 

106 Ohio St.3d 63, 2005-Ohio-3671, ¶ 6 (“The requirements of R.C. 2969.25 are mandatory, and 

failure to comply with them subjects an inmate’s action to dismissal.”). 

{¶3} Mr. Steele failed to comply with R.C. 2969.25(A) which requires the filing of an 

affidavit of prior civil actions including specific, mandatory, information. The affidavit must 

contain a description of each civil action or appeal of a civil action that the inmate has filed in 

the previous five years in any state or federal court. For each action or appeal, the affidavit must 

contain the case name, the case number, the court in which the case was filed, the name of each 

party, a brief description of the nature of the action or appeal, and the outcome. R.C. 

2969.25(A)(1) through (4). 

{¶4} Mr. Steele filed an affidavit of prior civil actions. He used a form that contained 

the following language: 

1. In the previous five years, I have/have not filed any civil actions or appeals 

of a civil action in state or federal court; 

2. During the last five years, I have/have not filed any civil actions, and no 

civil actions have been filed during the last three years. 

Although it appears the form was intended for the affiant to select or somehow indicate “have” 

or “have not” in each sentence, nothing was circled or crossed out. Mr. Steele also typed the 

name of one case after each of these sentences: 

State ex rel. Steele v. Eppinger, 147 Ohio St.3d 404 (Habeas Corpus) 

State ex rel. Steele v. McClelland, 154 Ohio St. 3d 574. (Prohibition / Mandamus 

(Sic.) 

{¶5} Mr. Steele’s affidavit of prior civil actions failed to comply with the mandatory 

requirements of R.C. 2969.25(A). Although the affidavit identified the case name, and 
C.A. No. 20CA011675 

Page 3 of 4 

 

parenthetically noted the first case involved habeas corpus and the second sought prohibition and 

mandamus relief, Mr. Steele did not comply with the other requirements of R.C. 2969.25(A). He 

failed to indicate the court in which the case was brought, the case number, the name of each 

party, a brief description of the nature of the action, and the outcome. R.C. 2969.25(A)(1) 

through (4). 

{¶6} The Supreme Court has held that “[c]ompliance with R.C. 2969.25(A) is 

mandatory, and failure to comply will warrant dismissal.” Robinson v. Fender, 159 Ohio St.3d 

99, 2020-Ohio-458, quoting State v. Henton, 146 Ohio St.3d 9, 2016-Ohio-1518, ¶ 3. The 

“statute requires strict compliance.” Id. Where the affidavit of prior actions does not provide all 

of the information required by R.C. 2969.25, the statute requires dismissal. State ex rel. Ware v. 

Walsh, 159 Ohio St.3d 120, 2020-Ohio-769, ¶ 4 (dismissal required where the affidavit of prior 

actions did “not provide any information describing the outcome of the actions as required by 

R.C. 2969.25(A)(4).”). 

{¶7} Because Mr. Steele did not comply with the mandatory requirements of R.C. 

2969.25, the case is dismissed. Costs taxed to Mr. Steele. The clerk of courts is hereby directed 

to serve upon all parties not in default notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the 

journal. Civ.R. 58. 

 

 LYNNE S. CALLAHAN 

 FOR THE COURT 

HENSAL, J. 

SCHAFER, J. 

CONCUR. 
C.A. No. 20CA011675 

Page 4 of 4 

 

APPEARANCES: 

TRACEE STEELE, Pro se, Petitioner. 

DAVE YOST, Ohio Attorney General, and DANIEL J. BENOIT, Associate Assistant Attorney 

General, for Respondent.