Page 3 of 13

less than that by the oral route and toxicity by the dermal route at environmental concentrations 

is not expected. Therefore, quantitation of risk following dermal exposure was not required. 

No teratogenic effects were noted in a rabbit developmental study at the high dose of 10 

mg/kg/day. Children born to mothers treated with streptomycin injections have sometimes had 

hearing loss; no teratogenic effects have been attributed to streptomycin treatment. Because the 

dose selected for risk assessment is much lower than the injected dose at which toxicity occurs in 

humans, there are no residual concerns and the Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) safety 

factor was reduced to 1x. 

Table 1. Toxicological Doses and Endpoints for Streptomycin Human Risk Assessment

Exposure Dose and Uncertainty 

Factors

Special FQPA Safety 

Factor

Study and Toxicological Effects

Acute Dietary

(any population)

N/A N/A Toxicity from single-dose exposure 

not identified.

Chronic Dietary

(all populations)

NOAEL = 5 mg/kg/day

UF = 100

chronic RfD = 0.05 

mg/kg/day

FQPA SF = 1X

chronic PAD = 0.05 

mg/kg/day

2-year feeding study in rats

LOAEL = 10 mg/kg/day based on 

reduced body weight gain 

Inhalation 

exposure (all 

durations)

NOAEL = 5 mg/kg/day

UF = 100

FQPA SF = 1X 2-year feeding study in rats

LOAEL = 10 mg/kg/day based on 

reduced body weight gain 

Dermal exposure N/A N/A Not required because of minimal 

dermal absorption.

Cancer Classification: "Inadequate Information to Assess Carcinogenic Potential"

UF = uncertainty factor, FQPA SF = FQPA safety factor, NOAEL = no observed adverse effect level, 

LOAEL = lowest observed adverse effect level, chronic RfD = chronic reference dose = NOAEL/UF, 

NA = Not Applicable, PAD = population adjusted dose = RfD/FQPA SF

Residue Chemistry

To support the emergency exemption for use of streptomycin in grapefruit, eight field trials were 

performed in the states of California (2), Florida (5) and Texas (1). Detailed information about 

the location of the field trials is not available; however, the number of field trials per region 

follows the recommendations of the OPPTS 860.1500 guideline. Streptomycin was applied as 

the Firewall formulation which is a wettable powder containing 22.4% streptomycin sulfate. The 

application method was not described; two applications were performed at a rate of 0.448 lb ai/A

with a 21-day RTI. The petition requested a 21-day PHI, but the field trials had a 60-day PHI. 

Samples were analyzed by the analytical method entitled, “Confirmation of Aminoglycosides by 

HPLC-MS/MS”; United States Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service, 

Office of Public Health Science, SOP No: CLG-AMG1.02; Effective June 1, 2005. The 

registrant states that method validation and concurrent recoveries were between 70-120%. 

Duplicate samples were collected and analyzed for parent streptomycin. Streptomycin residues 

found in grapefruit were 0.0090 - 0.0855 ppm (see Table 2). The OECD tolerance calculation 

procedures (March 2011 version) were used to determine the appropriate tolerance level for 
Page 4 of 13

grapefruit; see Appendix A. Thus, a tolerance level of 0.15 ppm is appropriate for streptomycin

in/on grapefruit. This recommendation is lower than tolerance level (0.20 ppm) proposed by the 

petitioner. 

Table 2. Residues of Streptomycin in Grapefruit (ppm)

Trial Sample 1 Sample 2 Average

08-CA08 0.0230 0.0211 0.022

08-CA09 0.0090 0.0096 0.010

08-FL53 0.0380 0.0244 0.031

08-FL54 0.0185 0.0236 0.021

08-FL55 0.0281 0.0547 0.041

08-FL56 0.0583 0.0855 0.072

08-FL57 0.0656 0.0699 0.066

08-TX01 0.0479 0.0394 0.044

A processing study was done by treating a plot at a 5X rate and harvesting 60 days after 

treatment. Residues in the raw agricultural commodity were 0.167 ppm. The grapefruit was 

processed to juice, oil and dried pulp. No concentration was observed for grapefruit juice or oil; 

therefore, residues in these commodities are covered by the tolerance for grapefruit. The dried 

pulp had residues of approximately 0.76 ppm which leads to a concentration factor (CF) of 4.5X. 

The highest average field trial (HAFT) is 0.072 ppm and a 4.5X CF was reported for grapefruit 

pulp. A tolerance of 0.40 ppm (HAFT x CF = 0.072 ppm x 4.5 = 0.32 ppm) is recommended for 

grapefruit, dried pulp.

Table 3. Tolerance Summary for Streptomycin.

Commodity Tolerance (ppm) Comments; Correct 

Established Proposed Recommended Commodity Definition

Grapefruit1 None 0.20 0.15

Grapefruit, dried pulp2 None 1.0 0.40

1 OECD tolerance calculation procedures were used to estimate the tolerance recommended for grapefruit. The 

tolerance proposed by the petitioner was obtained NAFTA tolerance calculation procedures. .

2 The tolerance recommended was obtained from the product of the HAFT and the CF. The registrant used the 

tolerance proposed for grapefruit instead of the HAFT.

Conclusion: The data submitted supports two applications of Firewall to grapefruit at maximum 

single rate of 0.448 lb ai/A with a 21-day RTI and a 60-day PHI. Tolerances of 0.15 ppm and 

0.40 ppm are recommended for grapefruit and grapefruit, dried pulp, respectively.
Page 5 of 13

Dietary Exposure

The last dietary assessment for streptomycin was conducted to support the tolerance 

reassessment eligibility decision (T. Goodlow, D310391, 01/09/2006). To support the current 

emergency exception, chronic dietary risk assessments including food and drinking water were 

conducted using the Dietary Exposure Evaluation Model DEEM-FCIDTM, Version 2.03. A 

chronic population adjusted dose (cPAD) of 0.05 mg/kg/day was used. No acute dietary toxicity 

endpoint was identified from the streptomycin toxicology database. Cancer quantitation was not 

required. 

The chronic assessment used tolerance level residues for all registered commodities, plus

grapefruit (0.15 ppm was used for grapefruit and grapefruit juice). In addition, default 

processing factors were used for all commodities except grapefruit juice. One hundred percent 

crop treated was assumed for all crops. The estimated drinking water concentration (EDWC) for 

surface water (51.4 ppb) provided by the Environmental Fate and Effects Division (EFED) was

used. The EDWC is based on aerial application to apple orchards. Dietary risk estimates for 

food and drinking water were below the Agency’s level of concern. The highest exposure was 

for children 1<2 years old (0.006486 mg/kg/day) which utilized 13 % of the chronic population 

adjusted dose (cPAD). Accordingly, the proposed emergency exemption will not result in dietary 

risks of concern with a 60-day PHI.

Table 4. Summary of Estimated Chronic Dietary (Food and Drinking 

Water) Exposure and Risk for Streptomycin

Population Subgroup Dietary Exposure

(mg/kg/day) % cPAD

General U.S. Population 0.002303 4.6

All Infants (< 1 year old) 0.006393 13

Children 1-2 years old 0.006486 13

Children 3-5 years old 0.004926 9.9

Children 6-12 years old 0.002756 5.5

Youth 13-19 years old 0.001797 3.6

Adults 20-49 years old 0.001853 3.7

Adults 50+ years old 0.001879 3.8

Females 13-49 years old 0.001832 3.7
Page 6 of 13

Residential Exposure and Risk Assessment

Estimated risks for homeowner users of streptomycin products were assessed in the 2006 

streptomycin risk assessment because labels give directions for applying in residential 

environments (e.g., EPA Reg No.s 74011-311 and 80990-4, the latter is the label associated with 

this action). Streptomycin would be used in residential areas to control the same diseases (e.g., 

blight, various rots) as it would in commercial greenhouse and agricultural settings. 

Applications would typically be made to trees and various types of shrubs. How exposures for 

these types of uses are addressed in risk assessment is described in the recently updated Standard 

Operating Procedures for Residential Exposure Assessment (SOPs).

1

Streptomycin is not significantly absorbed through the dermal route. Hence, only inhalation 

exposures are pertinent for risk assessment. Estimated inhalation risks for residential applicators 

have been recalculated for this assessment to reflect the most up to date residential SOPs which 

describe both the applicable scenarios that should be considered and how the calculations should 

be completed. The algorithms and other inputs used for the calculations are described in the 

SOPs. The point of departure, as described above, is a NOAEL of 5 mg/kg/day based on a 2 

year feeding study in rats based on reduced body weight gain with a total uncertainty factor of 

100. The application rate (i.e., lb ai/gallon input parameter) is based on the same values 

specified in the 2006 TRED for consistency because the cited label is clearly intended for 

residential users (EPA Reg 74011-311). The label associated with this action (EPA Reg 80990-

4) also allows for uses in a residential environment at a slightly higher application rate (i.e., 

0.00112 instead of 0.00085 lb ai/gallon) but it is likely that, because of the resistance 

management issues stipulated on this label, that this product would not be used by homeowners.

For all scenarios considered estimated risks are not of concern (i.e., Margins of Exposure or 

MOEs exceed the target of 100 in all cases): the lowest calculated MOE is 86,000. Based on the 

scenarios considered, the absorbed dose recommended for aggregation purposes is 0.000058

mg/kg/day. If the application rate for EPA Reg 80990-4 was considered it would not alter the 

outcome of this assessment given the minor differences in application rate relative to the 

magnitude of the MOEs which were calculated.

Although a quantitative residential post-application inhalation exposure assessment was not 

performed, an inhalation exposure assessment was performed for handlers. This exposure 

scenario is representative of a worse case inhalation exposure and is protective of any potential 

post-application inhalation exposure.

 

1

http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/science/residential-exposure-sop.html
Page 7 of 13

 Table 5. Inhalation Risks For Homeowners Who Mix and Apply Streptomycin

Scenario Formulation Application 

Equipment/Method

Inhalation 

Unit 

Exposure 

(mg/lb ai)

Application 

Rate (lb 

ai/gallon)

Amount 

Handled 

Daily

(gallons)

Inhalation 

Absorbed 

Dose 

(mg/kg/day) 

Inhalation 

MOE 

Gardens / 

Trees

Wettable 

powders

Manuallypressurized 

Handwand

1.1 0.00085 5 0.000058 86,000

Gardens / 

Trees

Wettable 

powders Hose-end Sprayer 0.0014 0.00085 11 0.00000016 31,000,000

Gardens / 

Trees

Wettable 

powders Backpack 1.1 0.00085 5 0.000058 86,000

Gardens / 

Trees

Wettable 

powders Sprinkler can 0.0014 0.00085 5 0.000000074 67,000,000

Aggregate Exposure Assessment 

In accordance with the FQPA, HED must consider and aggregate (add) pesticide exposures and 

risks from three major sources: food, drinking water, and residential exposures. In an aggregate 

assessment, exposures from relevant sources are added together and compared to the quantitative 

estimate of hazard (e.g., a NOAEL in this case). When aggregating exposures and risks from 

various sources, HED considers both the route and duration of exposure.

Aggregate exposure for streptomycin included oral (food and water) and inhalation routes. The 

population group with both the highest dietary exposure and a residential component of the 

aggregate, the general US population, was used to assess aggregate exposure. The dermal route 

was not included because no dermal hazard exists for this chemical, as noted previously. 

Table 6. Short-Term Aggregate Risk Calculations

Population NOAEL 

mg/kg/day LOC1

Max 

Allowable 

Exposure2

mg/kg/day

Average 

Food and 

Water 

Exposure 

mg/kg/day

Residential 

Exposure 

mg/kg/day3

Total 

Exposure 

mg/kg/day4

Aggregate 

MOE (food, 

water, and 

residential)5

General US 

population 5 100 0.05 0.002303 0.000058 0.002361 2100

1 The Level of Concern = 100, based on a 10x interspecies UF and a 10x intraspecies UF. 

2 Maximum Allowable Exposure (mg/kg/day) = NOAEL/LOC

3 Residential Exposure = Inhalation Exposure. 

4 Total Exposure = Avg Food & Water Exposure + Residential Exposure. From Tables 3 and 4.

5
Page 8 of 13

Occupational Exposure and Risk Assessment

Occupational exposures and corresponding risks have not been evaluated for streptomycin since 

the completion of the Reregistration Eligibility Document in 1992.2 Streptomycin use in 

agriculture and for ornamentals is typically for the control of various diseases such as blight, 

various rots and citrus canker. In this action, the Florida Department of Agriculture and 

Consumer Services (FDACS) has asked for streptomycin use to be allowed on grapefruit in order 

to manage citrus canker at an application rate of 0.448 lb streptomycin per acre per application 

with an allowable seasonal use of 0.896 lb streptomycin per acre (i.e., 2 applications per season). 

FDACS also specified that applications are to be by ground equipment only and no applications 

are to occur via chemigation. A restricted entry interval (REI) of 12 hours and a 21-day PHI

were specified in the petition (however, a 60-day PHI is being recommended by HED as 

previously discussed). Handlers are required to wear normal work clothing, chemical resistant 

gloves and footwear, and a dust/mist respirator (i.e., PF=5 respirator). The label associated with 

this section 18 action is for Firewall 17WP Fungicide/Bactericide (EPA Reg 80990-4) which is a 

wettable powder formulation containing 22.4 percent streptomycin available in normal 

packaging (i.e., it does not appear to be sold in water soluble packets). 

In occupational exposure and risk assessments for pesticides both handler and post-application 

exposures are considered. Dermal exposures are considered for both and inhalation exposures 

are considered only for handlers. As there is no dermal endpoint associated with streptomycin, 

only inhalation exposures for handlers have been calculated. The inputs and algorithms used as 

the basis of these calculations have been recently updated.3 The hazard aspects of the assessment 

are similar to those described above for the residential risk assessment. Risks (MOEs) have been 

calculated for the scenarios that would be expected to be associated with common applications to 

citrus in Florida such as airblast application to orchards. At the current level of protective

equipment specified in the proposed streptomycin label (i.e., PF-5 respirator) risks are not a 

concern for all scenarios considered (i.e., MOEs exceed 100 in all circumstances). 

Table 7. Occupational Handler Risk from Mixing/Loading/Application of Streptomycin

Exposure Scenario

Crop or 

Target Application Rate

Amount 

Handled 

or Area 

Treated

INHALATION MOE

[Values are rounded, R=Respirator]

Worker 

Activity Form. Application Equipment

Application 

Type No-R PF5 R PF10 R EC

M/L WP Airblast Broadcast

Orchard 

(e.g., 

apples, 

grapes)

0.448 lb ai/acre 40 acres 520 2600 5200 93000

Applicat

or

Spray Airblast Broadcast

Orchard 

(e.g., 

apples, 

grapes)

0.448 lb ai/acre 40 acres 4700 24000 47000 330000

M/L/A WP

Mechanicall

y-pressurized 

Handgun

Broadcast 

(foliar)

Orchard 

(e.g., 

apples, 

grapes)

0.000747 lb ai/gal 1000 gal 140000 690000 1400000 No Data

 

2

http://www.epa.gov/oppsrrd1/REDs/old_reds/strep_sulfate.pdf

3

http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/science/handler-exposure-data.html , includes both the algorithms and the 

recommended input parameters for risk assessment purposes.
Page 9 of 13

Appendix A. Tolerance established for grapefruit by using the OECD Calculator.

Streptomycin

Grapefruit

USA (CA, TX and FL)

2 Single Appl of 0.448 lb ai/A, 21-day RTI, 60-day PHI

Total number of data (n) 8

Percentage of censored data 0%

Number of non-censored data 8

Lowest residue 0.010

Highest residue 0.072

Median residue 0.036

Mean 0.038

Standard deviation (SD) 0.022

Correction factor for censoring (CF) 1.000

Proposed MRL estimate

- Highest residue 0.072

- Mean + 4 SD 0.126

- CF x 3 Mean 0.115

Unrounded MRL 0.126

Rounded MRL 0.15
Page 10 of 13

Appendix B. Chronic Food Residue Input file.

Filename: F:\Dietary Assessments\Streptomycin\ChronicFood&SurfaceWater_2012.R98

Chemical: Streptomycin

RfD(Chronic): .05 mg/kg bw/day NOEL(Chronic): 5 mg/kg bw/day

RfD(Acute): 0 mg/kg bw/day NOEL(Acute): 0 mg/kg bw/day

Date created/last modified: 05-22-2012/19:05:47/8 Program ver. 2.03

Comment: Emergency exception for grapefruit (0.15 ppm). Chronic run incorporating default 

processing factors. 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 EPA Crop Def Res Adj.Factors Comment

 Code Grp Commodity Name (ppm) #1 #2 

-------- ---- ------------------------------- ---------- ------ ------ -------

11000070 11 Apple, fruit with peel 0.250000 1.000 1.000 

11000080 11 Apple, peeled fruit 0.250000 1.000 1.000 

11000081 11 Apple, peeled fruit-babyfood 0.250000 1.000 1.000 

11000090 11 Apple, dried 0.250000 8.000 1.000 

11000091 11 Apple, dried-babyfood 0.250000 8.000 1.000 

11000100 11 Apple, juice 0.250000 1.300 1.000 

11000101 11 Apple, juice-babyfood 0.250000 1.300 1.000 

11000110 11 Apple, sauce 0.250000 1.000 1.000 

11000111 11 Apple, sauce-babyfood 0.250000 1.000 1.000 

06030300 6C Bean, black, seed 0.500000 1.000 1.000 

06020310 6B Bean, broad, succulent 0.500000 1.000 1.000 

06030320 6C Bean, broad, seed 0.500000 1.000 1.000 

06020330 6B Bean, cowpea, succulent 0.500000 1.000 1.000 

06030340 6C Bean, cowpea, seed 0.500000 1.000 1.000 

06030350 6C Bean, great northern, seed 0.500000 1.000 1.000 

06030360 6C Bean, kidney, seed 0.500000 1.000 1.000 

06020370 6B Bean, lima, succulent 0.500000 1.000 1.000 

06030380 6C Bean, lima, seed 0.500000 1.000 1.000 

06030390 6C Bean, mung, seed 0.500000 1.000 1.000 

06030400 6C Bean, navy, seed 0.500000 1.000 1.000 

06030410 6C Bean, pink, seed 0.500000 1.000 1.000 

06030420 6C Bean, pinto, seed 0.500000 1.000 1.000 

06010430 6A Bean, snap, succulent 0.500000 1.000 1.000 

06010431 6A Bean, snap, succulent-babyfood 0.500000 1.000 1.000 

04020850 4B Celery 0.250000 1.000 1.000 

04020851 4B Celery-babyfood 0.250000 1.000 1.000 

04020860 4B Celery, juice 0.250000 1.000 1.000 

11001290 11 Crabapple 0.250000 1.000 1.000 

10001800 10 Grapefruit 0.150000 1.000 1.000 

10001810 10 Grapefruit, juice 0.150000 1.000 1.000 

11002100 11 Loquat 0.250000 1.000 1.000 

11002660 11 Pear 0.250000 1.000 1.000 

11002661 11 Pear-babyfood 0.250000 1.000 1.000 

11002670 11 Pear, dried 0.250000 6.250 1.000 

11002680 11 Pear, juice 0.250000 1.000 1.000 

11002681 11 Pear, juice-babyfood 0.250000 1.000 1.000 

08002700 8 Pepper, bell 0.250000 1.000 1.000 

08002701 8 Pepper, bell-babyfood 0.250000 1.000 1.000 

08002710 8 Pepper, bell, dried 0.250000 1.000 1.000 

08002711 8 Pepper, bell, dried-babyfood 0.250000 1.000 1.000 

08002720 8 Pepper, nonbell 0.250000 1.000 1.000 

08002721 8 Pepper, nonbell-babyfood 0.250000 1.000 1.000 

08002730 8 Pepper, nonbell, dried 0.250000 1.000 1.000 

19022740 19B Pepper, black and white 0.250000 1.000 1.000 

19022741 19B Pepper, black and white-babyfood 0.250000 1.000 1.000 

01032960 1C Potato, chips 0.250000 1.000 1.000 

01032970 1C Potato, dry (granules/ flakes) 0.250000 6.500 1.000 

01032971 1C Potato, dry (granules/ flakes)-b 0.250000 6.500 1.000 

01032980 1C Potato, flour 0.250000 1.000 1.000 

01032981 1C Potato, flour-babyfood 0.250000 1.000 1.000 

01032990 1C Potato, tuber, w/peel 0.250000 1.000 1.000 

01032991 1C Potato, tuber, w/peel-babyfood 0.250000 1.000 1.000 

01033000 1C Potato, tuber, w/o peel 0.250000 1.000 1.000 

01033001 1C Potato, tuber, w/o peel-babyfood 0.250000 1.000 1.000 
Page 11 of 13

11003100 11 Quince 0.250000 1.000 1.000 

08003750 8 Tomato 0.250000 1.000 1.000 

08003751 8 Tomato-babyfood 0.250000 1.000 1.000 

08003760 8 Tomato, paste 0.250000 5.400 1.000 

08003761 8 Tomato, paste-babyfood 0.250000 5.400 1.000 

08003770 8 Tomato, puree 0.250000 3.300 1.000 

08003771 8 Tomato, puree-babyfood 0.250000 3.300 1.000 

08003780 8 Tomato, dried 0.250000 14.300 1.000 

08003781 8 Tomato, dried-babyfood 0.250000 14.300 1.000 

08003790 8 Tomato, juice 0.250000 1.500 1.000 

95003800 O Tomato, Tree 0.250000 1.000 1.000 

86010000 O Water, direct, all sources 0.051400 1.000 1.000 

86020000 O Water, indirect, all sources 0.051400 1.000 1.000 
Page 12 of 13

Appendix C. Chronic Results file.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Ver. 2.00

DEEM-FCID Chronic analysis for STREPTOMYCIN (1994-98 data)

Residue file name: F:\Dietary Assessments\Streptomycin\ChronicFood&SurfaceWater_2012.R98

 Adjustment factor #2 NOT used.

Analysis Date 05-22-2012/19:07:20 Residue file dated: 05-22-2012/19:05:47/8

Reference dose (RfD, Chronic) = .05 mg/kg bw/day

COMMENT 1: Emergency exception for grapefruit (0.15 ppm). Chronic run incorporating default 

processing factors.

===============================================================================

 Total exposure by population subgroup

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Total Exposure

 -----------------------------------

 Population mg/kg Percent of 

 Subgroup body wt/day Rfd 

-------------------------------------- ------------- ---------------

U.S. Population (total) 0.002303 4.6%

U.S. Population (spring season) 0.002270 4.5%

U.S. Population (summer season) 0.002330 4.7%

U.S. Population (autumn season) 0.002314 4.6%

U.S. Population (winter season) 0.002297 4.6%

Northeast region 0.002237 4.5%

Midwest region 0.002348 4.7%

Southern region 0.002201 4.4%

Western region 0.002477 5.0%

Hispanics 0.002680 5.4%

Non-hispanic whites 0.002241 4.5%

Non-hispanic blacks 0.002243 4.5%

Non-hisp/non-white/non-black 0.002600 5.2%

All infants (< 1 year) 0.006393 12.8%

Nursing infants 0.002861 5.7%

Non-nursing infants 0.007733 15.5%

Children 1-6 yrs 0.005266 10.5%

Children 7-12 yrs 0.002561 5.1%

Females 13-19 (not preg or nursing) 0.001761 3.5%

Females 20+ (not preg or nursing) 0.001865 3.7%

Females 13-50 yrs 0.001975 3.9%

Females 13+ (preg/not nursing) 0.002056 4.1%

Females 13+ (nursing) 0.002450 4.9%

Males 13-19 yrs 0.001828 3.7%

Males 20+ yrs 0.001848 3.7%

Seniors 55+ 0.001882 3.8%

Children 1-2 yrs 0.006486 13.0%

Children 3-5 yrs 0.004926 9.9%

Children 6-12 yrs 0.002756 5.5%

Youth 13-19 yrs 0.001797 3.6%

Adults 20-49 yrs 0.001853 3.7%

Adults 50+ yrs 0.001879 3.8%

Females 13-49 yrs 0.001832 3.7%

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 13 of 13

Appendix D. International Residue Limits 

Streptomycin (PC Code 006306)

Streptomycin Sulfate (PC Code 006310)

Summary of US and International Tolerances and Maximum Residue Limits 

Residue Definition:

US Canada Mexico2 Codex3

40 CFR 180.441:

Plants (commodities in this action): 

Tolerances are established for residues of 

the fungicide streptomycin in or on food 

commodities as follows:

None

Commodity1 Tolerance (ppm) /Maximum Residue Limit (mg/kg)

US Canada Mexico2 Codex3

Grapefruit 0.15

Grapefruit, dried pulp 0.40

Completed: M. Negussie; 07/12/2012

1

Includes only commodities of interest for this action. Tolerance values should be the HED recommendations and 

not those proposed by the applicant.

2 Mexico adopts US tolerances and/or Codex MRLs for its export purposes.

3 * = absent at the limit of quantitation; Po = postharvest treatment, such as treatment of stored grains. PoP = 

processed postharvest treated commodity, such as processing of treated stored wheat. (fat) = to be measured on the 

fat portion of the sample. MRLs indicated as proposed have not been finalized by the CCPR and the CAC.