alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

B.B., a minor, by and )

through his mother and )

next friend, OWENA KNOWLES, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 3:06cv715-MHT

) 

PAWN CITY, INC., a )

corporation, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion for leave to amend

complaint (doc. no. 2) is granted. The court assumes

that the non-movants have no objection to the allowance

of the amendment; however, if they do, they must file the

objection within seven days from the date of this order.

DONE, this the 21st day of August, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 6 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 1 of 1
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE ROBERTO FERNANDEZ-RUIZ, 

Petitioner, No. 03-74533

v. Agency No.  A90-116-400 ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney

General, ORDER

Respondent. 

Filed December 13, 2005

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active

judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by

the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The threejudge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to

this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to

the extent adopted by the en banc court.

16431
PRINTED FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS

BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted

© 2005 Thomson/West.
#### Clark *v.*Ballew.

May 16, 1913.

Complaint. Before Judge Ellis. Fulton superior court. July 6, 1913.

*Moore & •Branch*and *A. C. Corbett,*for plaintiff in error.

Lumpkin, J.

1. While the evidence was conflicting, and the jury might have been warranted in finding for the defendant, it was sufficient to support a finding for the plaintiff. The credibility of witnesses was for the jury; and the presiding judge having overruled a motion for a new trial, which complained only of the finding of the jury, and assigned no error upon any charge or ruling of the eourt pending the trial, this eourt will not reverse the judgment.

2. Although the evidence for the plaintiff might have authorized a verdict for a greater amount than that found, this will not necessitate a reversal, on motion of the defendant, under the facts of this ease.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-18-00197-CV

In the Matter of A.T. §

§

§

§

From The Probate Court

of Denton County (MH-2018-242)

July 12, 2018

Opinion by Justice Birdwell

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Wade Birdwell_________________

 Justice Wade Birdwell
# Subpart 1629.4—Contract Clauses

**Parent topic:**PART 1629—TAXES

## 1629.402 Foreign contracts.

The clause set forth in section 1652.229–70 shall be inserted in all FEHBP contracts performed outside the United States, its possessions, and Puerto Rico.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                   JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                     MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                97,004
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                         52,090
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   1,630,934
<PP&E>                            46,069,185
<DEPRECIATION>                    16,618,512
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    29,139,547
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              1,746,351
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                       (15,651,002)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      29,139,547
<SALES>                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   1,322,549
<CGS>                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        950,244
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     417,546
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   766,046
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (811,287)
<INCOME-TAX>                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 (811,287)
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                        (811,287)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         (39.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0.00
Subpart 3019.2—Policies

Parent topic: PART 3019—SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS

3019.201 General policy.

(d) DHS is committed to a unified team approach involving senior management, small business

specialists, acquisition personnel and program staff to support both critical homeland security

missions and meet public policy objectives concerning small business participation in departmental

procurements. The Director, Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization, is responsible

for the implementation and execution of programs to assist small businesses, veteran owned small

businesses, service-disabled veteran owned small businesses, HUBZone small businesses, small

disadvantaged businesses, and women-owned small business concerns as required by the Small

Business Act.
#### § 923.62 Right of the Secretary.

The members of the committee (including successors and alternates), and any agents, employees, or representatives thereof, shall be subject to removal or suspension by the Secretary at any time. Each and every regulation, decision, determination, or other act of the committee shall be subject to the continuing right of the Secretary to disapprove of the same at any time. Upon such disapproval, the disapproved action of the committee shall be deemed null and void, except as to acts done in reliance thereon or in accordance therewith prior to such disapproval by the Secretary.
1451.102 Authorization to use Government

supply sources.

If the CO decides to authorize a contractor to use Government supply sources under the conditions

prescribed in FAR 51.102, a written request for a FEDSTRIP activity address code (See FPMR

101-26.203) shall be made through the acquisition office FEDSTRIP point of contact.

Parent topic: Subpart 1451.1 - Contractor Use of Government Supply Sources
#### In the Matter of a Trust Created by Charlotte P. Hyde, Deceased. Glens Falls National Bank and Trust Company et al., as Trustees of a Trust Created by Charlotte P. Hyde, Deceased, Respondents; Louis H. Whitney et al., Appellants. In the Matter of a Trust Created by Charlotte P. Hyde, Deceased. Glens Falls National Bank and Trust Company et al., as Trustees of a Trust Created by Charlotte P. Hyde, Deceased, Respondents; Louis H. Whitney et al., Appellants. *1028In the Matter of a Trust Created by Nell Pruyn Cunningham, Deceased. Banknorth, N.A., et al., as Trustees of a Trust Created by Nell Pruyn Cunningham, Deceased, Respondents; Louis H. Whitney et al., Appellants.

*1027(Proceeding No. 1.)

(Proceeding No. 2.)

*1028(Proceeding No. 3.)

Submitted December 3, 2007;

decided January 15, 2008

Reported below, 44 AD3d 1195.

Motion for leave to appeal denied with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements. Motion for a stay dismissed as academic.
#### § 993.82 Funds.

All funds received by the committee pursuant to the provisions of this part shall be used solely for authorized purposes. The Secretary may, at any time, require the committee or its members and alternate members to account for all receipts and disbursements.
Case 2:06-cr-00206-MHT-CSC Document 79 Filed 05/14/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cr-00206-MHT-CSC Document 79 Filed 05/14/2008 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cr-00206-MHT-CSC Document 79-2 Filed 05/14/2008 Page 1 of 1
```

[House Document 109-152]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

                                     

109th Congress, 2d Session - - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 109-152
 
                   CERTIFICATION FOR AN EXPORT TO THE

                       PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA

                               __________

                             COMMUNICATION

                                  from

                   THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

                              transmitting

CERTIFICATION THAT THE EXPORT TO THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA OF THE 
 SPECIFIED ITEMS IS NOT DETRIMENTAL TO THE UNITED STATES SPACE LAUNCH 
 INDUSTRY, AND THAT THE MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING ANY INDIRECT 
  TECHNICAL BENEFIT THAT COULD BE DERIVED FROM SUCH EXPORTS, WILL NOT 
  MEASURABLY IMPROVE THE MISSILE OR SPACE LAUNCH CAPABILITIES OF THE 
   PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA, PURSUANT TO PUB. L. 105-261, SEC. 1512

    November 15, 2006.--Referred to the Committee on International 
                  Relations and ordered to be printed
                                           The White House,
                                     Washington, November 15, 2006.
Hon. J. Dennis Hastert,
Speaker of the House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.
    Dear Mr. Speaker: In accordance with the provisions of 
section 1512 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 1999 (Public Law 105-261), I hereby certify that 
the export to the People's Republic of China of the following 
items are not detrimental to the U.S. space launch industry and 
that the material and equipment, including any indirect 
technical benefit that could be derived from such exports, will 
not measurably improve the missile or space launch capabilities 
of the People's Republic of China:
           110,000 pounds of fine grain bulk graphite 
        to be distributed to seven companies in the People's 
        Republic of China for machining into industrial 
        components; and
           A motorized mixer with a stainless steel 
        vacuum mixing tank to Dow Corning (Shanghai) Company in 
        the People's Republic of China.
            Sincerely,
                                                    George W. Bush.

                                  

```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 17-0033

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

SHANE CLARK JOHNSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including April 20, 2020, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 10 2020

03/10/2020

Case Number: DA 17-0033
PUBLIC LAW 109–279—AUG. 17, 2006 120 STAT. 779

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5540:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):

June 19, considered and passed House.

Aug. 2, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–279

109th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 217 Southeast

2nd Street in Dimmitt, Texas, as the ‘‘Sergeant Jacob Dan Dones Post Office’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SERGEANT JACOB DAN DONES POST OFFICE.

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal

Service located at 217 Southeast 2nd Street in Dimmitt, Texas,

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Sergeant Jacob Dan Dones

Post Office’’.

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation,

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference

to the ‘‘Sergeant Jacob Dan Dones Post Office’’.

Approved August 17, 2006.

Aug. 17, 2006

[H.R. 5540]
-1-

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS. CR. NO. 3:06CR204-MEF

HENRY ERIK YAPIAS,

Defendant.

MOTION FOR PSYCHOLOGICAL EXAMINATION PRIOR TO SENTENCING

COMES now the Defendant by and through counsel, and moves this Honorable Court to 

for a psychological examination of the Defendant prior to sentencing, and cites as grounds therefore

as follows:

1. At the time of the interview with the Probation Officer, counsel was present and heard

the Defendant relate numerous places and institutions that have treated the Defendant for

psychological and/or emotional problems as well as drug use and abuse since a very early age. The

Defendant related that he has been institutionalized on several occasions and is presently on psycho

tropic medication.

2. Counsel does not present to the Court a mental disease or defect issue. Counsel does

present to the Court that due to the Defendant’s drug and alcohol use from the age of about 12, his

history of mental treatment from numerous sources, that a full picture of the Defendant’s mental,

psychological, and emotional status cannot be made without further information.

3. Previous counsel from the Federal Defender’s Office discussed a Diminished Capacity

downward departure request and such is mentioned in the Plea Agreement. 

4. The undersigned was waiting for the Defendant’s records requested by the Probation

Officer before such a motion was filed. Now, however, the records have not been timely furnished

Case 3:06-cr-00204-MEF-CSC Document 31 Filed 01/25/2007 Page 1 of 2
-2-

to the Probation Officer and counsel does not have the information necessary to support such a

departure as contemplated.

5. Upon interview it is obvious that something is amiss with the Defendant and his drug and

alcohol use and abuse from a very, very early age with his extensive criminal history tends to

support an inability to control his behavior in a socially acceptable manner. He appears to lack the

capacity to conform his conduct to that required of a citizen. 

6. Counsel submits that a full psychological assessment of the Defendant is necessary prior

to sentencing. Counsel believes that with or without his prior treatment history and records, and it

appears we are without, a current assessment is warranted.

PREMISE considered this Honorable Court is requested to order a psychological assessment

of the Defendant, either by granting funds to counsel to retain a private psychologist or having the

Bureau of Prisons evaluate the Defendant. 

Respectfully submitted this the 25th day of January, 2007.

S/_______________________________

Sydney Albert Smith SMI098

ASB-3560-H70S

P. O. Drawer 389

Elba, AL 36323

334-897-3658

sydneyalbertsmith@charter.net

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I haved served a copy of the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the

CM/ECF system which will send notifications of such filing to the following:

Chris Snyder, Assistant United States Attorney

S/_____________________________

Sydney Albert Smith

Case 3:06-cr-00204-MEF-CSC Document 31 Filed 01/25/2007 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>             5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         230,432
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,102,644
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,308,326
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,157,310
<PP&E>                                       1,572,662
<DEPRECIATION>                                 728,559
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,106,716
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,201,685
<BONDS>                                        362,307
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,250,834
<OTHER-SE>                                     124,276
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,106,716
<SALES>                                      3,033,663
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,197,986
<CGS>                                        3,720,327
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,199,413
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,325
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             101,208
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                146,714
<INCOME-TAX>                                    55,509
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             91,205
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    91,205
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear at 70 FR 30897, May 31, 2005; 77 FR 39904, July 6, 2012; 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 10.12 Interview and other investigation. ( a ) The Director, Division of Facilities and Security, Office of Administration, may authorize the granting of access authorization and/or employment clearance on the basis of the information in the possession of the NRC or may authorize an interview with the individual, if the individual consents to be interviewed, or other investigation as the Director deems appropriate. On the basis of this interview and/or an investigation, the Director may authorize the granting of access authorization and/or employment clearance.
( b ) The individual may elect on constitutional or other grounds not to participate in an interview or other investigation; however, such refusal or failure to furnish or authorize the furnishing of relevant and material information is deemed to be derogatory information pursuant to § 10.11(a) (5) and (12).
( c ) If the Director, Division of Facilities and Security, cannot make a favorable finding regarding the eligibility of an individual for access authorization and/or employment clearance, the question of the individual's eligibility must be resolved in accordance with the procedures set forth in § 10.20 *et seq.*
[47 FR 38676, Sept. 2, 1982, as amended at 52 FR 31609, Aug. 21, 1987; 54 FR 53316, Dec. 28, 1989; 64 FR 15642, Apr. 1, 1999]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

June 19, 2007

NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY

 REGARDING CORPORATE/

CONFLICT STATEMENT

To: LV Stabler Memorial Hospital

From: Clerk’s Office

Case Style: Progressive American Insurance Company vs. Carol Thorn, et al

Case Number: 2:06cv717-ID

Docket Entry # 50

Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 7.1, and this

Court’s General Order Miscellaneous Case No. 00-3047 parties are required to file their

Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement at their initial appearance.

No corporate/conflict disclosure statement has been filed by you in this action.

This deficiency must be corrected within ten (10) days from this date. Please refer to

attachment.

Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 51 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### § 1015.504 Preservation of evidence.

DOE will take care to preserve all files and records that may be needed by the DOJ to prove its claims in court. DOE ordinarily will include certified copies of the documents that form the basis for the claim in the packages referring its claims to the DOJ for litigation. DOE shall provide originals of such documents immediately upon request by the DOJ.
Table of Contents

 

 

**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Section 1350 Certification**

 

                In connection with the quarterly report of China Industrial Waste Management, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Dong Jinqing, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

                1.            The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

                2.            The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

               August 12, 2010                                                   /s/ Dong Jinqing

                                                                                                Dong Jinqing

Chief Executive Officer

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

----
§ 985.42 Accounting. ( a ) *Excess funds.* At the end of a marketing year, funds in excess of the year's expenses may be placed in an operating reserve not to exceed approximately one marketing year's operational expenses or such lower limits as the Committee, with the approval of the Secretary, may establish. Funds in such reserve shall be available for use by the Committee for expenses authorized pursuant to § 985.40. Funds in excess of those placed in the operating reserve shall be refunded to handlers: *Provided,* That any sum paid by a first handler in excess of that handler's pro rata share of the expenses during any marketing year may be applied by the Committee at the end of such marketing year to any outstanding obligations due the Committee from such person. Each handler's share of such excess funds shall be the amount of assessments paid in excess of that handler's pro rata share.
( b ) *Disposition of funds upon termination of order.* Upon termination of this part, any funds not required to defray the necessary expenses of liquidation shall be disposed of in such manner as the Secretary may determine to be appropriate: *Provided,* That to the extent practicable, such funds will be returned pro rata to the first handler from whom such funds were collected.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of First Community Financial Corporation, (the 
Company) for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Richard R. Leitzel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. To my knowledge, the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



|                        |  |     |  |                                            
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------
|Date: November 10, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/ Richard R. Leitzel                     
|                        |  |     |  | Richard R. Leitzel, Chief Financial Officer
|                        |  |     |  | (Principal Financial Officer)