alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 986.90 Derogation.

Nothing contained in this part is or shall be construed to be in derogation of, or in modification of, the rights of the Secretary or of the United States to exercise any powers granted by the Act or otherwise, or, in accordance with such powers, to act in the premises whenever such action is deemed advisable.
Order entered December 20 , 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 22

- 00695

- CR

DARIOUS DANTREL LEWIS , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the C r iminal District Court No. 1 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F

- 2075804

- H

O RDER

Before the Court is Court Report er Cheryl A. Dixon ’ s request for a third

extension of time to file the reporter’s record. We GRANT the request and

ORDER the reporte r ’s record fil ed by January 12, 202 3 . We caution Ms. Di xon

that further extensions will be s trongly disf avored

.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
#### In the Matter of Howard Quigley, Petitioner, v Hudson Valley Community College, Respondent.

Proceeding instituted in this court pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review a determination of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated May 7, 1980, which vacated an order of the State Division of Human Rights finding respondent guilty of an unlawful discriminatory practice based on disability and dismissed the complaint. After four to five weeks of performing custodial services at Hudson Valley Community College while an employee of a temporary services agency, petitioner applied for the permanent position as custodian at the college. A physical examination was required, following which petitioner was denied employment because of a discogenic disc disease of the lower back in the area of L-4. On May 13, 1977 petitioner filed a complaint with the Division of Human Rights charging respondent with an unlawful discriminatory practice in failing to employ him because of a physical disability. A hearing was held on November 14, 1978, resulting in an order *573in favor of petitioner. An appeal to the State Human Rights Appeal Board was heard on September 27, 1979 and, by decision dated May 7, 1980, the order appealed from was vacated and the complaint was dismissed. A majority of the board found the record demonstrated that petitioner’s disability was related to his ability to perform the duties of a custodian (Executive Law, § 292, subd 21)* and in accordance with our decision in *Matter of State Div. of Human Rights v Averill Park Cent. School Dist.*(59 AD2d 449, affd 46 NY2d 950) dismissed the complaint for lack of jurisdiction. The board was quite correct and its determination should be confirmed *(Matter of Westinghouse Elec. Corp. v State Div. of Human Rights,*49 NY2d 234; *Matter of Thomas J. Lipton, Inc. v New York State Human Rights Appeal Bd.,*67 AD2d 1029; *City of New York, Environmental Protection Agency v Feinberg,*67 AD2d 653). Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Staley, Jr., and Casey, JJ., concur.

*

 This subdivision of the Executive Law was amended by the Laws of 1979 (ch 594, § 1), effective July 10, 1979, apparently to overcome the effect of the decision in *Averill Park,*but that amendment has been held not retroactive and, accordingly, it is not applicable in this proceeding (see *State Div. of Human Rights [Ghee] v County of Monroe,*48 NY2d 727).
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3443 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1H-Imidazole, 2-ethyl-4-methyl- (9Cl). 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 6, 2006 

Mr. REID introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1H-Imidazole, 2-ethyl4-methyl- (9Cl). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 1H-IMIDAZOLE, 2-ETHYL-4-METHYL- (9Cl). 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.29.12 1H-Imidazole, 2-ethyl-4-methyl- (9Cl) 

(CAS No. 931–36–2) (provided for in 

subheading 2933.29.90) .......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•S 3443 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
§ 993.90 Termination or suspension. ( a ) *Failure to effectuate policy of act.* The Secretary may, at any time, terminate the provisions of this subpart, by giving at least one day's notice by means of a press release or in any other manner which he may determine. The Secretary shall terminate or suspend the operation of any or all of the provisions of this subpart, whenever he finds that such provisions do not tend to effectuate the declared policy of the act.
( b ) *Referendum.* The Secretary shall terminate the provisions of this subpart on or before the fifteenth day of July of any crop year, to be effective at the end of such crop year, whenever he is required to do so by the provisions of section 8c(16)(B) of the act. The Secretary may, at any time he deems it desirable, hold a referendum of producers to determine whether they favor termination of this subpart. However, beginning with 1951, if the Secretary receives a recommendation, adopted by at least a majority vote of the producer members of the committee, requesting the holding of such a referendum, the Secretary shall hold such a referendum: *Provided,* That the Secretary shall not be required to hold such a referendum upon the basis of such a request more than once every two years.
( c ) *Termination of act.* The provisions of this subpart shall terminate, in any event, upon the termination of the act.
#### § 930.28 Alternate members.

An alternate member of the Board, during the absence of the member for whom that member serves as an alternate, shall act in the place and stead of such member and perform such other duties as assigned. However, if a member is in attendance at a meeting of the Board, an alternate member may not act in the place and stead of such member. In the event a member and his or her alternate are absent from a meeting of the Board, such member may designate, in writing and prior to the meeting, another alternate to act in his or her place: *Provided,* that such alternate represents the same group (grower or handler) as the member. In the event of the death, removal, resignation or disqualification of a member, the alternate shall act for the member until a successor is appointed and has qualified.

[67 FR 51714, Aug. 8, 2002]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1087 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1087

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      December 5, 2006.
    Resolved, That--
            (1) Room H-139 of the Capitol shall be known and designated as the 
        ``Henry J. Hyde Room''; and
            (2) this resolution shall take effect on the day following the date 
        on which Henry J. Hyde is no longer serving as a Member of the House of 
        Representatives.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           1,052
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,574
<ALLOWANCES>                                        88
<INVENTORY>                                     23,089
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,617
<PP&E>                                           7,641
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,964
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  43,649
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,392
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           105
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,370
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    43,649
<SALES>                                         11,892
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,892
<CGS>                                            7,656
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,713
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 324
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    210
<INCOME-TAX>                                        80
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                130
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       130
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
#### § 990.63 Interstate transportation of hemp.

No State or Indian Tribe may prohibit the transportation or shipment of hemp lawfully produced under a State or Tribal plan approved under subpart B of this part, under a license issued under subpart C of this part, or under 7 U.S.C. 5940 through the State or territory of the Indian Tribe, as applicable.
Subpart 1331.1 - Applicability

Parent topic: PART 1331 - CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES

1331.101 Objectives.

The designee authorized to approve individual deviations concerning cost principles is set forth in

CAM 1301.70.
EX-4.3



 Exhibit 4.3 

DICERNA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. 

AMENDED AND RESTATED 2016 INDUCEMENT PLAN 

1. PURPOSE OF PLAN 
 The purpose of this
Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Amended and Restated 2016 Inducement Plan (this “Plan”) of Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), is to advance the interests of the Corporation by
providing a material inducement for the best available individuals to join the Corporation and its subsidiaries as employees by affording such individuals an opportunity to acquire a proprietary interest in the Corporation 

2. ELIGIBILITY 
 The Plan will be reserved
solely for awards to persons whom the Corporation may issue shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of the Corporation (“Common Stock”) without stockholder approval pursuant to Rule 5635(c)(4) of the NASDAQ Listing
Rules, or any successor rule relating to inducement awards. 
 3. SHARE LIMITS; GRANT OF AWARDS 

The maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be delivered pursuant to awards granted to Eligible Persons under this Plan is 575,000
shares (the “Share Limit”), such limits to be subject to adjustment as contemplated by Section 4.3, Section 7.1 and Section 8.10 of the 2014 Plan. 

4. EFFECTIVE DATE 
 This Plan is effective
as of March 4, 2016, the date of its approval by the Board (the “Effective Date”). Unless earlier terminated by the Board, this Plan shall terminate at the close of business on the day before the tenth anniversary of the
Effective Date. After the termination of this Plan either upon such stated expiration date or its earlier termination by the Board, no additional awards may be granted under this Plan, but previously granted awards (and the authority of the
Administrator with respect thereto, including the authority to amend such awards) shall remain outstanding in accordance with their applicable terms and conditions and the terms and conditions of this Plan. 

5. OTHER TERMS 
 Except as expressly set
forth herein, the terms of the Plan shall be identical to the terms of the 2014 Plan, and such terms are incorporated by reference into this Plan (with such non-substantive changes as are necessary to reflect
their usage in this Plan instead of the 2014 Plan); provided, however, that no ISOs shall be awarded under this Plan. In the event of any conflict between the provisions in this Plan and those of the 2014 Plan, the provisions of this Plan shall
govern. 
 6. DEFINED TERMS 

6.1. “2014 Plan” means the Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Amended and Restated 2014 Performance Incentive Plan, as may
be amended from time to time. 







 6.2. “Employee” means any person whom the Corporation or any Subsidiary
classifies as an employee (including an officer) for employment tax purposes, whether or not that classification is correct. 
 6.3.
“Director” means a member of the board of directors of the Corporation or any Subsidiary. 
 6.4. Defined terms not
defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the 2014 Plan.
#### § 1008.16 Prohibition against disclosure.

Except as provided in § 1008.17, the DOE shall not disclose any record which is contained in a system of records, by any means of communication, to any agency or to any person other than the individual who is the subject of the record.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

MONTY W. ERVIN and )

PATRICIA D. ERVIN, )

)

Petitioners, )

)

v. ) 1:06-MC-3331-MEF-DRB

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

and COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL )

REVENUE SERVICE, )

)

Respondents. )

ORDER

Upon referral of this case for action on all pretrial matters and for recommendation

as may be appropriate (Doc. 58), it is for good cause,

ORDERED that the parties shall convene for a HEARING on March 19, 2007 at

10:00 a.m. The conference shall be heard in District Courtroom 4A, Frank M. Johnson, Jr.

United States Courthouse Complex, One Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama. The

conference shall be attended by at least one of the attorneys representing each of the parties

and by any party who is not represented by an attorney. 

The parties should be prepared to discuss the pending Petition to Quash (Doc. 1, filed

July 26, 2006), the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 6, filed September 15, 2006), and any update in

the status of the case. 

Case 1:06-mc-03331-MEF-TFM Document 10 Filed 03/01/2007 Page 1 of 2
DONE this 1st day of March, 2007.

/s/Terry F. Moorer

TERRY F. MOORER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-mc-03331-MEF-TFM Document 10 Filed 03/01/2007 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-74,336]

      ( print page 77666)    
                    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (“Act”), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on August 26, 2010, applicable to workers of Polaris Industries, including on-site leased workers from Westaff, Osceola, Wisconsin. The notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 15, 2010 (75 FR 56143).                

At the request of the petitioner, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged in activities related to the production of components for recreational vehicles.

The company reports that workers leased from Supply Technologies were employed on-site at the Osceola, Wisconsin location of Polaris Industries. The Department has determined that these workers were sufficiently under the control of Polaris Industries to be considered leased workers.

Based on these findings, the Department is amending this certification to include workers leased from Supply Technologies working on-site at the Osceola, Wisconsin location of Polaris Industries.

The amended notice applicable to TA-W-74,336 is hereby issued as follows:

All workers of Polaris Industries, including on-site leased workers from Westaff and Supply Technologies, Osceola, Wisconsin, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after June 28, 2009, through August 26, 2012, and all workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation from employment on the date of certification through two years from the date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 6th day of December 2010.

Michael W. Jaffe,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2010-31165 Filed 12-10-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
§ 927.35 Funds and other property. ( a ) All funds received pursuant to any of the provisions of this subpart shall be used solely for the purposes specified in this subpart, and the Secretary may require the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee and its members to account for all receipts and disbursements.
( b ) Upon the death, resignation, removal, disqualification, or expiration of the term of office of any member or employee, all books, records, funds, and other property in his or her possession belonging to the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee shall be delivered to his or her successor in office or to the Fresh Pear Committee or Processed Pear Committee, and such assignments and other instruments shall be executed as may be necessary to vest in such successor or in the Fresh Pear Committee or Processed Pear Committee full title to all the books, records, funds, and other property in the possession or under the control of such member or employee pursuant to this subpart.
#### Gihon, LLC, Respondent, v 501 Second Street, LLC, Appellant.

[814 NYS2d 729]

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring the parties’ rights and obligations under a commercial lease, the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Knipel, J.), dated November 29, 2004, as, upon an order of the same court dated March 13, 2003, finding the defendant in contempt and imposing a fine, granted that branch of the plaintiff’s motion which was for leave to enter a judgment against the defendant pursuant to the prior order dated March 13, 2003.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

It is well settled that a litigant may not raise any issue on subsequent appeal which was raised, or could have been raised, in an earlier appeal which was dismissed for lack of prosecution *(see Bray v Cox,*38 NY2d 350 [1976]). Here, the defendant appealed from the order dated March 13, 2003. That appeal was dismissed for lack of prosecution. We decline to exercise our discretion to determine the issues raised in the present appeals, which could have been raised on the appeal from the order dated March 13, 2003 *(see Midlantic Commercial Leasing Corp. v Levin,*22 AD3d 727 [2005]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Krausman, J.P., Luciano, Fisher and Dillon, JJ., concur.
##               Budget and Strategy Menu          

## Budget and Strategy

            -  Strategic Plan 
            -  Budget, Performance, and Financial Reporting                -  Archive 

Every year we present financial and performance results and plans to the American people, the President, and to Congress. These reports share detailed information about how we use our financial resources and progress in reaching our strategic goals. Our financial reports demonstrate our commitment to our mission and accountability over the resources entrusted to us. Our performance reports and plans document our accomplishments and challenges in protecting consumers and promoting a competitive marketplace, as well as set targets for the future. Our archive provides documents from past years. **View the Archive**

### Congressional Budget Justifications

                        - **FY 2025 Congressional Budget Justification**
                        - **FY 2024 Congressional Budget Justification**
                        - **FY 2023 Congressional Budget Justification**
                        - **FY 2022 Congressional Budget Justification**

### Annual Performance Report and Plan

                        - **FY 2023 Annual Performance Report and FY 2024-25 Plan**

### Agency Financial Report

                        - **FY 2023 Agency Financial Report**

### Data Quality Appendix

                        - **Data Quality Appendix** , updated 4/4/2024

### FTC Appropriation and FTE Utilization

                        - FY 2024 Appropriation  = $425.7 million
                        - **FTC Appropriation and FTE History**

### Federal Activities Inventory Reform (FAIR) Act Inventory

2023 FAIR Act Inventory

Join us at the FTC!

View our open positions

**Return to top
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Balance Sheet 9/30/96 and 9/30/95
Income Statements for Quarters ending 9/30/96 and 9/30/95
Statement of Cash Flows for Three Months ended 9/30/96 and 9/30/95
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                        (47,048)
<SECURITIES>                                    37,308
<RECEIVABLES>                                  299,743
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    500,393
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               753,088
<PP&E>                                          31,552
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 812,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          449,275
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,900,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   812,000
<SALES>                                        504,728
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               304,728
<CGS>                                          355,445
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  474,687
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 30,041
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             30,041
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    30,041
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>