alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 905.50 Marketing policy. ( a ) Before making any recommendations pursuant to § 905.51 for any variety of fruit, the committee shall, with respect to the regulations permitted by § 905.52, submit to the Secretary a detailed report setting forth an advisable marketing policy for such variety for the then current shipping season. Such report shall set forth the proportion of the remainder of the total crop of such variety of fruit (determined by the committee to be available for shipment during the remainder of the shipping season of such variety) deemed advisable by the committee to be shipped during such season.
( b ) In determining each such marketing policy and advisable proportion, the committee shall give due consideration to the following factors relating to citrus fruit produced in Florida and in other States: ( 1 ) The available crop of each variety of citrus fruit in Florida, and in other States, including the grades and sizes thereof, which grades and sizes in Florida shall be determined by the committee pursuant to § 905.31;
( 2 ) The probable shipments of citrus fruit from other States;
( 3 ) The level and trend in consumer income;
( 4 ) The prospective supplies of competitive commodities; and
( 5 ) Other pertinent factors bearing on the marketing of fruit.
( c ) In addition to the foregoing, the committees shall set forth a schedule of proposed regulations for the remainder of the shipping season for each variety of fruit for which recommendations to the Secretary pursuant to § 905.51 are contemplated. Such schedules shall recognize the practical operations of harvesting and preparation for market of each variety and the change in grades and sizes thereof as the respective seasons advance. In the event it is deemed advisable to alter such marketing policy or advisable proportion as the shipping season progresses, in view of changed demand and supply conditions with respect to fruit, the said committee shall submit to the Secretary a report thereon.
( d ) The committee shall transmit a copy of each marketing policy report or revision thereof to the Secretary and to each producer and handler who files a request therefor. Copies of all such reports shall be maintained in the office of the committee where they shall be available for examination by producers and handlers.
[22 FR 10734, Dec. 27, 1957. Redesignated at 26 FR 12751, Dec. 30, 1961, as amended at 30 FR 13934, Nov. 4, 1965; 42 FR 59371, Nov. 17, 1977]
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 27 Filed 03/15/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 27 Filed 03/15/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 27 Filed 03/15/2007 Page 3 of 3
222 So.2d 68

#### Edward BLANCHET v. VERMILION PARISH SCHOOL BOARD.

No. 49816.

May 9, 1969.

In re: Edward Blanche! applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Vermilion. 220 So.2d 534.

Writ denied. The showing made does not warrant the issuance of a writ of review.
§ 948.22 Issuance of regulations. ( a ) The Secretary shall limit by regulation the handling of potatoes whenever he finds from recommendations and information submitted by an area committee, or from other available information, that such regulation would tend to effectuate the declared policy of the act. Such regulation may: ( 1 ) Limit the handling of particular grades, sizes, qualities, or maturities of any or all varieties of potatoes, or any combination of the foregoing during any period.
( 2 ) Limit the handling of particular grades, sizes, qualities, or maturities of potatoes differently, for different varieties, for different containers, for different packs, for different portions of the production area, for different purposes under § 948.23, or for any combination of the foregoing, during any period.
( 3 ) Provide a method through rules and regulations issued pursuant to this subpart for fixing the size, capacity, weight, dimensions, or pack of the container, or containers, which may be used in the packaging or handling of potatoes, or both.
( 4 ) Establish in terms of grades, sizes, or both, minimum standards of quality and maturity.
( b ) Any regulation issued hereunder may be amended, modified, suspended, or terminated by the Secretary on recommendations by an area committee, or on other available information, to provide for ( 1 ) Such changes in regulations found necessary by changes in supplies, demand, or prices;
( 2 ) Minimum quantities which should be relieved of regulatory or administrative obligations; or
( 3 ) Relief from regulations no longer tending to effectuate the declared policies of the Act.
( c ) The Secretary shall notify each committee of each regulation recommended by it and issued pursuant to this section. The respective committee shall give reasonable notice thereof to handlers. No regulation, except when relieving limitations, shall become effective less than two days after issuance thereof.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

ROY EDWARD PIKE, #079888, )

)

 Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-CV-668-MHT

)

ARNOLD HOLT, et al., )

)

 

ORDER ON MOTION

On August 28, 2006, the plaintiff filed a document styled “Motion to Dismiss”

(Court Doc. No. 7) in which he requests that he be allowed to proceed on the claims

presented to this court. The court therefore construes this document as an objection to the

Recommendation entered on July 27, 2006. Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED that:

1. This document be entered on the docket as an objection to the Recommendation.

2. The motion to dismiss be stricken from the docket as the plaintiff does not seek

dismissal of this case. 

Done this 29th day of August, 2006. 

/s/ Delores R. Boyd

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 2:06-cv-00668-MHT-DRB Document 8 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

 

Case 2:06-cv-00668-MHT-DRB Document 8 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
Angeles Income Properties, Ltd. IV 1998 Third Quarter 10-QSB and is 
qualified in its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000763049
<NAME> ANGELES INCOME PROPERTIES, LTD. IV
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998   
<CASH>                                           3,705
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          23,582
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,376   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,574   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         15,096     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0     
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         116    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,574    
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,405    
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,642    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,134    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (371)     
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.77)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        



</TABLE>
(88 Misc. Rep. 47)

#### BRUSSEL v. LOUVRE HOTEL CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

December 17, 1914.)

1. Evidence (§ 265*)—Admissions—Conclusiveness.

Alleged admissions, contained in the pleadings in an action by a third person against defendant, are not conclusive on defendant, but are open to explanation and contradiction.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, «see Evidence, Cent. Dig. §§ 1029-1050; Dee. Dig. § 265.*]

2. Evidence (§ 213*)—Compromise—Defer oe Judgment.

Under the direct provisions of Municipal Court Act (Laws 1902, c. 580) § 148, authorizing a defendant to offer to allow judgment, an offer of judgment, not accepted, cannot be introduced in evidence to establish defendant’s liability.

[Ed Note.—For other cases, see Evidence, Cent Dig. §§ 745-751, 753; Dec. Dig. § 213.*]

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, First Dis- ' trict.

Garnishment by Dennis G. Brussel against the Louvre Hotel Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed and remanded, unless the parties stipulate for a reduction of judgment.

Argued November term, 1914, before LEHMAN, DELANY, and WHITAKER, JJ.

Marks & Marks, of New York City (Harry M. Marks, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Pitcher & Stern, of New York City, for respondent.

*

For other cases’ see same topic & § number in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep’r Indexes

LEHMAN, J.

[1] The plaintiff has recovered a judgment for $300 in a garnishee action. At the trial the plaintiff was permitted to prove the amount of salary due, by offering in evidence the pleadings in an action brought by a third party against this defendant, and containing an alleged admission. It is not disputed that, if these pleadings contained any admissions, such admissions would not be conclusive, but would be open to explanation and contradiction; yet the trial justice refused all evidence offered for such purpose. The respondent, therefore, frankly admits that the judgment for $300 cannot stand, but urges that the defendant does not really dispute that it is liable for $180, and asks that the judgment be reduced to that amount, and affirmed as modified.

[2] While I agree that the defendant does not dispute that it is liable for some amount, there is no competent proof that this amount *497is $180. The offer of judgment for $180 was not accepted and cannot be introduced in evidence (Municipal Court Act, § 148), and the defendant has never expressly admitted that it owed this amount, except by argument that it did not owe more than $180. It follows that, if either party objects, we have no power to reduce the judgment to that sum.

Judgment should therefore be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, unless the parties stipulate that judgment may be reduced to $180, and appropriate costs in the court below, in which event, judgment as reduced should be affirmed, with costs to appellant in this court. All concur.
EXHIBIT 31.2 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)

I, Rod Lynam, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Gallery of History,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the quarter period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.



Date:  May 12, 2006           /s/  ROD LYNAM
                                 _______________________
                                 Rod Lynam
                                 Chief Financial Office
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17A0129. ROBERT DALTON PHILLIPS v. MELINDA IVY PHILLIPS.

Robert Phillips filed this appeal from the superior court’s final decree of

divorce. The Supreme Court, however, has general appellate jurisdiction over

divorce and alimony cases. See Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (6). 

Accordingly, this application is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court for

disposition.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

08/31/2016

August 31, 2016
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2012-0299

Directorate Identifier: 2011NM029AD

747-52A2294 --- 7/8/10

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

 _______________________________

HOWARD GLENN TOOLE, #C 917683 *

Petitioner, *

 v. * 1:06-CV-696-MHT

JAMES MCDONOUGH, et al., * 

Respondents. *

 _______________________________

ORDER ON MOTION

On 18 October, 2006, the respondents filed a Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. No.

21.) Upon review of the motion, the undersigned concludes that the request for additional

time to respond to the instant petition shall be granted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. Respondents’ Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. No. 21), is GRANTED; and

2. Respondents are GRANTED an extension from October 23, 2006 to November 13,

2006 to file their answer.

DONE this 24 day of October, 2006. th

/s/ Vanzetta Penn McPherson

VANZETTA PENN MCPHERSON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 22 Filed 10/24/2006 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,701,650
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,171,796
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     529,854
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,701,650
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,384,593
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             106,731
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,491,324)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,491,324)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,491,324)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (10.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (10.75)


</TABLE>
# SUBCHAPTER H - Buy Indian Act

- PART 1480 - ACQUISITIONS UNDER THE BUY INDIAN ACT 
- PARTS 1481-1499 [RESERVED] 

- PART 1480 - ACQUISITIONS UNDER THE BUY INDIAN ACT      - Subpart 1480.1 - General     - 1480.101   Scope of part.
    - 1480.102   Buy Indian Act acquisition regulations.
  - Subpart 1480.2 - Definitions     - 1480.201   Definitions.
  - Subpart 1480.3 - Applicability     - 1480.301   Scope of part.
    - 1480.302   Restrictions on the use of the Buy Indian Act.
  - Subpart 1480.4 - Policy     - 1480.401   Requirement to give preference to Indian Economic Enterprises.
    - 1480.402   Delegations and responsibility.
    - 1480.403   Deviations.
  - Subpart 1480.5 - Procedures     - 1480.501   General.
    - 1480.502   [Reserved]
    - 1480.503   Procedures for acquisitions under the Buy Indian Act.
    - 1480.504   Other circumstances for use of other than full and open competition.
    - 1480.505   Debarment and suspension.
  - Subpart 1480.6 - Contract Requirements     - 1480.601   Subcontracting limitations.
    - 1480.602   Performance and payment bonds.
  - Subpart 1480.7 - [Reserved]
  - Subpart 1480.8 - Representation by an Indian Economic Enterprise Offeror     - 1480.801   General.
    - 1480.802   Representation provision.
    - 1480.803   Representation process.
  - Subpart 1480.9 - Challenges to Representation     - 1480.901   General.
    - 1480.902   Receipt of challenge.
    - 1480.903   Award in the face of challenge.
    - 1480.904   Challenge not timely.
- PARTS 1481-1499 [RESERVED]
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

BRIAN BONNER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 3:06cv715-MHT

) 

NORINCO a/k/a CHINA NORTH )

INDUSTRIES CORP., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED as follows:

(1) The motion to reconsider (Doc. No. 95) is

granted.

(2) The parties are allowed until July 25, 2008, to

complete discovery.

DONE, this the 29th day of May, 2008.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 96 Filed 05/29/2008 Page 1 of 1
#### § 956.95 Separability.

If any provision of this subpart is declared invalid, or the applicability thereof to any person, circumstance, or thing is held invalid, the validity of the remainder of this subpart, or the applicability thereof to any other person, circumstance, or thing shall not be affected thereby.
COLLECTED BY
Alexa Crawls
Alexa Internet
Wayback Machine
Alexa Crawl EG
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.26






June 14, 2017 


CONFIDENTIAL TO: Mark Hutchens


Dear Mark, 


In recognition of the key role you play in the organization we are pleased to promote you to Executive Vice President effective June 13, 2017. You will retain the title of Chief Financial Officer. 


As discussed, your short-term incentive compensation target will increase immediately from 50% to 60% (of your base pay). In addition, you are eligible to receive the right and option to purchase, on the terms and conditions set forth in the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan and the Stock Option Agreement, 135,000 shares of Papa Murphy’s Holdings, Inc. stock.  The options will vest in 1/4th installments on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the date of grant, subject to your continued employment on the applicable vesting dates. The options will be granted to you on the first business day of the fiscal quarter following your promotion date (your options will be granted on July 4th at the July 3rd stock price). Your eligibility for all other Papa Murphy’s benefits will remain the same.


We look forward to your continued success on the Papa Murphy's team! 




Sincerely, 






/s/  Jean Birch                    
Jean Birch 
Interim CEO and Chair of the Board 




8000 NE Parkway Dr., Suite 350 ● Vancouver, WA 98662 ● Tel: (360) 260-7272 ● Fax (360) 260-0500