alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 4290
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 4290 appear at 85 FR 16522, Mar. 24, 2020.

§ 4290.680 Reporting changes in RBIC not subject to prior approval. ( a ) *Changes to be reported for post-approval.* This section applies to any changes in your Articles, ownership, capitalization, management, operating area, or investment policies that do not require the Agency's prior approval. You must report such changes to the Agency within 30 days after the change, for post approval.
( b ) *Approval by the Agency.* You may consider any change submitted under this § 4290.680 to be approved unless the Agency notifies you to the contrary within 90 days after receiving it. Approval is contingent upon your full disclosure of all relevant facts and is subject to any conditions the Agency may prescribe.
1515.606-70 Contracting methods.

The Department of Housing and Urban Development-Independent Agencies Appropriation Act

contains a requirement that none of the funds provided in the Act may be used for payment through

grants or contracts to recipients that do not share in the cost of conducting research resulting from

proposals that are not specifically solicited by the Government. Accordingly, contracts for research

which result from unsolicited proposals shall provide for the contractor to bear a portion of the cost

of performance for work subject to the Act. The extent of the cost sharing shall reflect the mutuality

of interest of the contractor and the Government. Therefore, where there is no measurable gain to

the performing organization, cost sharing is not required.

Parent topic: Subpart 1515.6 - Unsolicited Proposals
Subpart 2909.1 - Responsible Prospective

Contractors

Parent topic: PART 2909 - CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS

2909.105 Procedures.

Before awarding a contract, the contracting officer must make a written determination of the

otherwise successful bidder's/offeror's responsibility in accordance with FAR 9.105. In addition to

past performance information, the contracting officer must insure that the proposed contractor, and

any subcontractor representing more than $25,000 in goods or services, does not appear in the “List

of Parties Excluded from Federal Procurement” (available on the Internet at www.epls.gov). In

addition, contracting officers should base their determination of contractor responsibility on a

review of the company's “Summary or Financial Report” from Dun & Bradstreet (available on the

Internet for a fee at http://www.dnb.com/).
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3356 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 3-Amino-4-Methylbenzamide. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 5, 2006 

Mr. KENNEDY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 3-Amino-4- 

Methylbenzamide. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 3-AMINO-4-METHYLBENZAMIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.31.24 3-Amino-4-Methylbenzamide (CAS No. 

19406–86–1) (provided for in subheading 2924.29.76) ................................ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 3356 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         861,920
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,626
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0    
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      11,049,594
<DEPRECIATION>                             (5,724,438)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,330,332
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      5,914,149
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,330,332
<SALES>                                        601,864
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               613,925
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               530,428
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             134,178
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (50,681)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (50,681)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
310.001 Policy.

Market research shall be conducted as prescribed in Federal Acquisition Regulation part 10.

Parent topic: PART 310 - MARKET RESEARCH
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Derick Newton, Appellant.

Submitted December 10, 2007;

decided December 13, 2007

Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
# 5136.609-1 Design within funding limitations.

(c)(1)  The head of the contracting activity shall make the determination at FAR 36.609-1(c)(1).  See Appendix GG for further delegation.

**Parent topic:**5136.609 Contract clauses.
§ 1008.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) This part establishes the procedures to implement the Privacy Act of 1974 (Pub. L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. 552a) within the Department of Energy.
( b ) This part applies to all systems of records, as defined in § 1008.2(m), maintained by DOE.
( c ) This part applies to all divisions within the DOE, and to the personnel records of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), which are maintained by DOE on behalf of FERC. These regulations do not apply to other systems of records maintained by FERC. These regulations also apply to DOE contractors and their employees to the extent required by 5 U.S.C. 552a(m).
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 10-2 Filed 09/26/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 10-2 Filed 09/26/2006 Page 2 of 2
§ 1015.101 Prescription of standards. ( a ) The Secretary of the Treasury and the Attorney General of the United States issued regulations in 31 CFR parts 900-904, under the authority contained in 31 U.S.C. 3711(d)(2). Those regulations prescribe standards for Federal agency use in the administrative collection, offset, compromise, and the suspension or termination of collection activity for civil claims for money, funds, or property, as defined by 31 U.S.C. 3701(b), unless specific Federal agency statutes or regulations apply to such activities or, as provided for by Title 11 of the United States Code, when the claims involve bankruptcy. The regulations in 31 CFR parts 900-904 also prescribe standards for referring debts to the Department of Justice (DOJ) for litigation. Additional guidance is contained in the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) Circular A-129 (Revised), “Policies for Federal Credit Programs and Non-Tax Receivables,” the Treasury's “Managing Federal Receivables,” and other publications concerning debt collection and debt management. These publications are available from the Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Financial Policy, 1000 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20585.
( b ) Additional rules governing centralized administrative offset and the transfer of delinquent debt to Treasury or Treasury-designated debt collection centers for collection (cross-servicing) under the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996 (DCIA), Public Law 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321, 1358 (April 26, 1996), are set forth in separate regulations issued by Treasury. Rules governing the use of certain debt collection tools created under the DCIA, such as administrative wage garnishment, also are set forth in separate regulations issued by Treasury. See generally, 31 CFR part 285.
( c ) DOE is not limited to the remedies contained in this part and may use any other authorized remedies, including alternative dispute resolution and arbitration, to collect civil claims, to the extent that such remedies are not inconsistent with the Federal Claims Collection Act, as amended, Public Law 89-508, 80 Stat. 308 (July 19, 1966), the Debt Collection Act of 1982, Public Law 97-365, 96 Stat. 1749 (October 25, 1982), the DCIA or other relevant law. The regulations in this part do not impair DOE's common law rights to collect debts.
( d ) Standards and policies regarding the classification of debt for accounting purposes (for example, write-off of uncollectible debt) are contained in OMB's Circular A-129 (Revised), “Policies for Federal Credit Programs and Non-Tax Receivables.”
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Performanceand accountability report**** 
SuDocNumber:FHF1.1:
ItemNumber:0595-C(online)
CGPsystem Number:000595056
 
2005
2006
2007
 
 **
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

EASTERN DIVISION 

GREAT SOUTHERN WOOD * 

PRESERVING, INC., * 

 * 

 Plaintiff, * 

 * 

v. * Civil No. 1:06-cv-00708-CSC 

 * 

AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE * 

CO., AIG, AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL * 

UNDERWRITERS CORP., AMERICAN * 

INTERNATIONAL MARINE AGENCY, * 

 * 

 Defendants. 

DEFENDANTS' CONFLICT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

 COME NOW Defendants in the above-captioned matter, and in accordance with the 

order of this Court, make the following disclosures concerning parent companies, subsidiaries, 

partners, limited liability entity members and managers, trustees (but not trust beneficiaries), 

affiliates, or similar entities reportable under the provisions of the Middle District of Alabama’s 

General Order No. 3047: 

American International Group, Inc., which is commonly known as AIG, is a publicly 

traded company. Back O'Beyond, Inc. holds more than 10% of the shares of American 

International Group, Inc. 

American International Underwriters Corp. is a wholly owned subsidiary of American 

International Group, Inc. 

American Home Assurance Co. is a wholly owned subsidiary of AIG Commercial 

Insurance Group, Inc. 

American International Marine Agency, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of C.V. Starr 

& Co., Inc. 

 s/Louis C. Norvell 

BLANE H. CRUTCHFIELD (CRUTB4243) 

LOUIS C. NORVELL (NORVL4585) 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

 American Home Assurance Company, AIG, 

 American International Underwriters Corporation, 

 and American International Marine Agency 

Case 1:06-cv-00708-CSC Document 27 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

OF COUNSEL: 

HAND ARENDALL, L.L.C. 

P. O. Box 123 

Mobile, AL 36601-0123 

Tel: (251) 432-5511 

Fax: (251) 694-6375 

bcrutchfield@handarendall.com 

lnorvell@handarendall.com 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that I have on this 9th day of July, 2007 served the foregoing pleading on 

counsel of record via electronic notice or by United States mail first class, postage prepaid. 

Kenneth A. Dowdy, Esq. 

kad@lusklaw.com

Lusk, Lusk, Dowdy & Caldwell, P.C. 

2101 Highland Ave. 

Suite 410 

Birmingham, AL 35205 

Leslie Ann Caldwell, Esq. 

lac@lusklaw.com

Lusk, Lusk, Dowdy & Caldwell, P.C. 

2101 Highland Ave. 

Suite 410 

Birmingham, AL 35205 

 

s/Louis C. Norvell 

Case 1:06-cv-00708-CSC Document 27 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 2 of 2
Subpart 753.1—General

Parent topic: PART 753—FORMS

753.107 Obtaining forms.

Copies of any USAID Form referenced in the AIDAIR may be obtained from the U.S. Agency for

International Development, Washington, DC 20523–0001, Attention: M/AS/ISS, Distribution, Room

B–929 N.S., or from the cognizant contracting officer.
Opinion issued April 22, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 13
- 00987
- CV

——————————— HORIZON RADIOLOGY, P A AND FRANK C. POWEL L, M.D. , Appella nt s V. CRAIG & CRAIG, LLC AND JULIE A. WEBB, INDIV IDUALLY , Appell e e s

On Appeal from the 269th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 2013
- 21860

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellants, Horizon Radiology, PA and Frank C. Powell, M.D., have filed an agreed motion to dismiss the appeal. No opinion has issued. Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.1(a)(1). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.2 PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Massengale and Huddle.
1

 At least one of the officers also had on a vest with “police” written across it.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

Northern Division

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v ) CR. NO. 2:06mj079-SRW

)

SANTO COLEMAN )

ORDER

In accordance with the Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), a detention hearing was

held on September 1, 2006. There is a rebuttable presumption of detention in this case. I

find that the credible testimony and information submitted at the hearing establishes by clear

and convincing evidence that defendant presents a risk of flight or nonappearance. During

an attempted “controlled delivery” of narcotics, Coleman, who was in his truck in a motel

parking lot, was approached by agents who identified themselves as police.1

 Coleman hit the

gas and took off immediately, sped up over the curb, crossed the grass, and led agents – who

activated their blue lights and sirens – on a chase for several miles that ended only when

Coleman’s truck crashed through a fence and hit a tree. Coleman and the other occupant of

the truck then fled on foot, and Coleman was not located despite a search by K-9 officers.

Thereafter, although Coleman was aware that his companion had been arrested, and believed

that there might be a warrant for his own arrest, he did not turn himself in to authorities until

some 20 days after the chase. 

Based on the foregoing, the court concludes that there are no conditions or

Case 2:06-mj-00079-SRW Document 23 Filed 09/05/2006 Page 1 of 2
combination of conditions which will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant and

that the defendant should be detained. 

Further, based on the evidence adduced at the hearing, the Magistrate Judge concludes

that there is probable cause to believe that the defendant committed the offense charged in

the complaint. Therefore, it is

ORDERED that the defendant is bound over to the district court for further

proceedings. It is further 

ORDERED that the defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney General

or his designated representative for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the

extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal. The defendant shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity for private

consultation with defense counsel. On order of a court of the United States or on request of

an attorney for the Government, the person in charge of the corrections facility shall deliver

the defendant to the United States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection

with a court proceeding.

DONE, this 5th day of September, 2006.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-mj-00079-SRW Document 23 Filed 09/05/2006 Page 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of Raoul P., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

Order entered May 6, 1966, unanimously modified, on the law, the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of reversing the dispositional portion of the order placing appellant in a State Training School, and remanding the matter for a full dispositional hearing, without costs or disbursements. In this proceeding, it was determined that appellant had committed acts which if done by an adult would constitute the crime of burglary, *523and appellant was adjudged to be a juvenile delinquent. The adjudication of the appellant as a juvenile delinquent is not here questioned, the only point raised being the claimed invalidity of the order of disposition. The Family Court Act provides that a dispositional hearing must be held after the completion of the fact-finding hearing which determines delinquency. (Family Ct. Act, §§ 746, 749.) Consequently, any disposition made without a hearing is invalid. It must follow that if a hearing be inadequate, it is as if no hearing at all had been held, and any disposition made, based upon such hearing must be declared invalid. We cannot consider the hearing which was conducted to be a hearing in the full sense of the word because of the refusal of the court to hear parents who requested permission to speak. Indeed, the hearing as conducted did not satisfy the requirements of section 745 of the Family Court Act which provides that material and relevant evidence may be admitted during a dispositional hearing. Certainly, statements made by the parents should be considered. The parents have a substantial interest in the proceedings, an interest which is sought to be protected by various sections of the Family Court Act. (E.g., Family Ct. Act, §§ 741, 748, 749.) The refusal of the court to hear them is at the very least an abuse of discretion, if indeed there were room for discretion in the circumstances. Nor does it matter that the court in making its determination as to the disposition of the minor had before it certain reports which seemed to indicate that the court might very well have been correct in its determination. As was stated in *Matter of Dennis*(20 A D 2d 86, 89) “ Even though the court may be so familiar with all the facts that it believes that a dispositional hearing will be of no benefit to the child, the requirements of sections 743 to 749 must be followed and a dispositional hearing held.” *“*The dispositional hearing was more peremptory than the circumstances required.” *(Matter of Addison,*20 A D 2d 90, 93.) Accordingly, the matter is remanded for a full and complete dispositional hearing. Concur—Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Witmer, JJ.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 18

- 00197

- CV

In the Matter of A.T. §

§

§

§ From The Probate Court

o f Denton County (MH

- 2018

- 242 )

July 12, 2018

Opinion by Justice Birdwell



### JUDGMENT

This court has cons idered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ /s/ Wade Birdwell

_________________ Just ice Wade Birdwell
Exhibit 4.1


 







THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


March 8, 2018


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust 369 (the “Fund”)


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for the Fund, consisting of the unit investment trusts (the “Trusts”) included in
the Registration Statement relating to the Fund. We enclosed a list of the securities to be deposited in the Trusts on the date
hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such securities as of close of business on March 7, 2018, in accordance
with the valuation method set forth in the applicable Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreements. We consent to
the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations of the Trust securities in the Registration
Statement (No. 333-222461) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the registration of the sale of the
Units of the Trusts and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO________________


Gerardo Cipriano


Vice President
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

HOWARD GLEN TOOLE, etc., )

)

Petitioner, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv714-MHT

) 

JAMES McDONOUGH, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion for de novo

reconsideration (Doc. No. 26) is granted.

It is further ORDERED that the objections to the

magistrate judge’s orders (Doc. No. 26) are overruled.

It is further ORDERED that this cause is referred

back to the United States Magistrate Judge for further

appropriate proceedings.

DONE, this the 21st day of February, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00714-MHT-WC Document 27 Filed 02/21/2007 Page 1 of 1
§ 955.30 Powers. The committee shall have the following powers: ( a ) To administer the provisions of this part in accordance with its terms;
( b ) To make rules and regulations to effectuate the terms and provisions of this part;
( c ) To receive, investigate, and report to the Secretary complaints of violation of the provisions of this part; and
( d ) To recommend to the Secretary amendments to this part.
#### § 983.65 Confidential information.

All reports and records furnished or submitted by handlers to the committee which include confidential data or information constituting a trade secret or disclosing the trade position, financial condition, or business operations of the particular handler or their customers shall be received by, and at all times kept in the custody and under the control of, one or more employees of the committee, who shall disclose such data and information to no person except the Secretary. However, such data or information may be disclosed only with the approval of the Secretary, to the committee when reasonably necessary to enable the committee to carry out its functions under this part.

[69 FR 17850, Apr. 4, 2004. Redesignated at 74 FR 56541, Nov. 2, 2009]