alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### J. Lee Kavanau, Appellant, v. Virtis Company, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Order entered on or about January, 13,1969, dismissing complaint, unanimously reversed on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and motion denied, and the judgment entered thereon reversed. The Court of Appeals (21 N Y 2d 837, Feb. 22, 1968) has expressly permitted the plaintiff or his assignor to bring an action in damages in *quantum, meruit.*Such is the general nature of the complaint before us. And since it has been brought within six months of the Court of Appeals disposition and is *“*based upon the same transaction ” it is a permissible new action within the protection of CPLR 205 (subd. [a]). See *Titus*v. *Poole*(145 N. Y. 414, 423) construing a predecessor statute under the .Code of Civil Procedure. The present complaint rests upon *755the same general allegations and bperative facts as the previous action; the subject matter is the same; the apparati and items pertaining thereto are the same; the alleged breach of contract involves the same transaction, and the grievance is the same, namely deprivation of compensation for ideas and information imparted by plaintiff to defendant, the benefits of which the defendants have unlawfully appropriated and enriched themselves. The action is well taken. *(Petnel*v. *American Tel. & Tel. Co.,*280 App. Div. 706, 708.) The defendant Cenco Instruments Corporation is also permissibly joined by virtue of the allegations in the complaint, which for present purposes, are presumably true. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Capozzoli, McGivern, Markewieh and McNally, J'J.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

 _____________________________

MARVIN KURT NATION, #141 669 *

Plaintiff, *

v. * 2:06-CV-693-ID

 (WO)

WILLIE AMBERS, et al., *

Defendants. *

 ______________________________

ORDER ON MOTION

Upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion for Status, and for good cause, it is

ORDERED that the Motion for Status (Doc. No. 34) be and is hereby GRANTED.

Plaintiff is advised that this case is pending on his complaint, Defendants' written reports, and

Plaintiff’s opposition. No additional pleadings are necessary to a determination of the issues

presented herein, and Plaintiff will be informed of any action undertaken by the court on his

complaint. Plaintiff is further is advised that the instant action is pending on the

undersigned’s docket along with numerous other actions filed both before and after the

present complaint was filed. The court notes that this matter is ready for review and a

decision shall be rendered within due course as the court’s schedule permits.

Also pending before the court is Plaintiff’s request for appointment of counsel. A

plaintiff in a civil case has no constitutional right to counsel. While an indigent plaintiff may

Case 2:06-cv-00693-ID-TFM Document 35 Filed 10/11/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

be appointed counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1), a court retains broad discretion in

making this decision. See Killian v. Holt, 166 F.3d 1156, 1157 (11th Cir.1999). 

Here, the court finds from its review of the complaint that Plaintiff is able to

adequately articulate the facts and grounds for relief in the instant matter without notable

difficulty. Furthermore, the court concludes that Plaintiff's complaint is not of undue

complexity and that he has not shown that there are exceptional circumstances justifying

appointment of counsel. See Kilgo v. Ricks, 983 F.2d 189, 193 (11th Cir. 1993); Dean v.

Barber, 951 F.2d 1210, 1216 (11th Cir. 1992); see also Fowler v. Jones, 899 F.2d 1088, 1096

(11th Cir. 1990). Therefore, in the exercise of its discretion, the court shall deny Plaintiff's

request for appointment of counsel at this time. The request may be reconsidered if warranted

by further developments in this case.

Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. No. 34) be and

is hereby DENIED.

Done, this 11th day of October 2007.

 /s/ Terry F. Moorer 

TERRY F. MOORER

UNITED STATE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00693-ID-TFM Document 35 Filed 10/11/2007 Page 2 of 2
§ 945.42 Assessments. ( a ) The funds to cover the committee's expenses pursuant to § 945.40 shall be acquired by the levying of assessments upon handlers as provided in this subpart. Each handler who ships potatoes as the first handler thereof shall pay assessments to the committee upon demand, which assessments shall be in payment of such handler's pro rata share of such expenses.
( b ) Assessments shall be levied upon handlers at a rate per hundredweight of potatoes or equivalent established by the Secretary. Such rate may be established upon the basis of the committee's budget recommendations, and other available information.
( c ) At any time during or subsequent to a given fiscal period, the committee may recommend the approval of an amended budget and an increase in the rate of assessment. Upon the basis of such recommendation, or other available information, the Secretary may approve an amended budget and increase the rate of assessment. Such increase shall be applicable to all potatoes assessable under this part and handled by the first handler thereof during such fiscal period.
( d ) The committee may impose a late payment charge or an interest charge, or both, on any handler who fails to pay, on or before the due date established by the Secretary, the total assessment for which such handler is liable. Such due date and the late payment fee and interest rate shall be recommended by the committee and approved by the Secretary.
( e ) In order to provide funds to carry out its function, after the effective date of this subpart the committee may accept advance assessments from handlers. Advance assessments received from a handler shall be credited toward assessments levied against that handler during that fiscal period. In the case of an extreme emergency, the committee may also borrow money on a short-term basis to provide funds for the administration of this part. Any such borrowed money shall only be used to meet the committee's current financial obligations, and the committee shall repay all borrowed money by the end of the next fiscal period from assessment income.
[23 FR 5709, July 30, 1958. Redesignated at 26 FR 12751, Dec. 30, 1961, as amended at 60 FR 29727, June 5, 1995; 88 FR 82234, Nov. 24, 2023]
EXHIBIT 32.1 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gallery of History, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Todd Axelrod, Chief Executive Office of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

1.	 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presented, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Todd Axelrod
----------------
Todd Axelrod
Chief Executive Officer

February  , 2004




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 2:06-cv-00684-MHT-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/03/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00684-MHT-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/03/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00684-MHT-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/03/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00684-MHT-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/03/2006 Page 4 of 4
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 61 (Tuesday, March 31, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17031-17032]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07239]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the New York Advisory 
Committee

    Dates and Times: Friday, April 10, 2015 at 12:00 p.m. [EDT]
    Place: Via Teleconference. Public Dial-in 1-877-446-3914; Listen 
Line Code: 3098402
    TDD: Dial Federal Relay Service 1-800-977-8339 give operator the 
following number: 202-376-7533--or by email at ero@usccr.gov.
    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a planning meeting of 
the New York Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 12:00 
p.m. via conference call on Friday, April 10, 2015. The purpose of the 
planning meeting is for the Advisory Committee to discuss plans to 
conduct a public meeting on the over policing of communities of color 
in New York.
    The meeting will be conducted via conference call. Persons with 
hearing impairments must first dial the Federal Relay Service TDD: 1-
800-977-8339 and give the operator the Eastern Regional Office number 
(202-376-7533).
    Members of the public who call-in can expect to incur charges for 
calls they initiate over wireless lines, and the Commission will not 
refund any incurred charges. Callers will incur no charge for calls 
they initiate over land-line connections to the toll-free telephone 
number.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The 
comments must be received in ERO by 30 days after the meeting date. 
Comments may be mailed to the Eastern Regional Office, U.S. Commission 
on Civil Rights, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 1150, Washington, DC 
20425, faxed to (202) 376-7548, or emailed to Evelyn Bohor at

[[Page 17032]]

ero@usccr.gov. Persons who desire additional information may contact 
the Eastern Regional Office at 202-376-7533.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Eastern Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, 
www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Eastern Regional Office at the above 
phone number, email or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.
    Exceptional Circumstance: Pursuant to 41 CFR 102-3.150, the notice 
for this meeting is given less than 15 calendar days prior to the 
meeting because of the exceptional circumstances of technical 
difficulties occurring in the process of having the meeting notice 
signed and sent to the Federal Register.

    Dated: March 25, 2015.
David Mussatt,
Chief, Regional Programs Unit.
[FR Doc. 2015-07239 Filed 3-30-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
1536.602-2 Establishment of evaluation

boards.

(a) The Environmental Protection Agency Architect-Engineer Evaluation Board is established as a

central permanent Board located at Headquarters EPA under authority delegated to the Director,

Office of Acquisition Management, which may be re-delegated.

(b) The Service Center Manager (SCM) is delegated the authority to appoint either one or two

additional voting members as may be appropriate for a particular project.

(c) In the event of an emergency or extended absence, a member may designate, in writing, with the

concurrence of the Chairperson, an alternate experienced in architecture, engineering, or

construction to serve in his/her absence.

(d) The duties of the advisory member shall include, but not be limited to, the following:

(1) Assuring that the criteria set forth in the public notice are applied in the evaluation process; and

(2) Assuring that actions taken during the evaluation process do not compromise subsequent

procurement actions.

Parent topic: Subpart 1536.6 - Architect-Engineer Services
#### § 984.73 Reports of walnut receipts.

Each handler shall file such reports of his or her walnut receipts from growers, handlers, or others in such form and at such times as may be requested by the Board with the approval of the Secretary.

[73 FR 11339, Mar. 3, 2008]
EX-10.3





 Exhibit 10.3 
  


			
	 




	  	 Corporate Headquarters

1000 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 100
 Los
Angeles, CA 90017

		
	 April 28, 2010
	  	 Tel) 213 892 9999

Fax) 213 892 1199

www.firststandardbank.com


 Steve Park  

Re:        Offer Letter 

Dear Mr. Park: 

On behalf of First Standard Bank, I am pleased to offer you the position of Executive Vice President & Chief Credit
Officer, reporting to the President/Chief Executive Officer. This position is an important one to our organization and we look forward to you contributing your knowledge and expertise. 

 

	1.	 Hire Date. Your hire date will be June 1, 2010. 



	2.	 Base Salary. Your annualized gross salary will be $170,000 ($7,083.33
bi-monthly gross). We are paid on the 15th and last day of the month. 



	3.	 Stock Option. You will be allocated 70,000 Shares of stock options vesting equally over five years on
your anniversary date. 



	4.	 Auto Allowance. You will be paid an auto allowance of $700 per month. 



	5.	 Vacation. You will receive four (4) weeks paid vacation annually accrued at a rate of 6.67 hours
per pay period. 



	6.	 Benefits. You will be eligible for Health benefits of medical, dental, vision, and life insurance and
401(k) Retirement Plan (currently no matching) on your start date. 



	7.	 Performance Incentive Plan. You will be eligible for a discretionary bonus tied to the Bank making a
profit and meeting annual bank and individual goals. 


 During your employment you will have access to
confidential and proprietary information, which we consider private and protect adamantly. We also resolve any dispute between you and us by arbitration. Therefore, this offer is conditioned on your execution and delivery of an Arbitration
Agreement, which will be provided on your hire date or upon request. Your employment is also contingent upon the successful completion of regulatory approval, background, and reference checks, as well as being able to establish your identity and
authorization to work in the United States on your first day of work. We are an at-will organization, which means either party may terminate the relationship at any time with or without cause and with or
without notice. 
 I am delighted to extend this offer to you and look forward to working together. Please indicate your
acceptance of this offer by signing one copy of this letter. The terms of this offer supersede any prior representation or terms, whether expressed orally or in writing. If you have any questions regarding this application, please contact Jackie
Shin at 213.892.1196. 
  

					
	 Sincerely,
	 		 	
			
	 /s/ Min Kim
	 	  
	 	  

	 Min Kim
	 		 	
	 President and Chief Executive Officer


  

					
	 Acceptance:
	 		 	
			
	 /s/ Steve Park
	 	  
	 	4/28/10
	 Steve Park
	 		 	Date
§ 1014.10 Action on approved claims. ( a ) Payment of any approved claim shall not be made unless the claimant executes ( 1 ) a Standard Form 1145,
( 2 ) a claims settlement agreement, or
( 3 ) a Standard Form 95, as appropriate consistent with applicable rules of the Department of Justice, Department of the Treasury, and the General Accounting Office. When a claimant is represented by an attorney, the voucher for payment shall designate both the claimant and the attorney as payees, and the check shall be delivered to the attorney, whose address shall appear on the voucher.
( b ) If the claimant or the claimant's agent or legal representative accepts any award, compromise, or settlement made pursuant to the provisions of section 2672 or 2677 of title 28, United States Code, that acceptance shall be final and conclusive on the claimant, the claimant's agent or legal representative, and any other person on whose behalf or for whose benefit the claim has been presented. The acceptance shall constitute a complete release of any claim against the United States and against any employee of the Government whose act or omission gave rise to the claim, by reason of the same subject matter.
Form 12507

(December 1999) Innocent Spouse Statement

My Name Social Security Number

Telephone Number Best Time to Call

Purpose of form: You can use this form to provide additional information to the Internal Revenue

Service (IRS) to consider in determining relief of joint and several liability for the tax year(s) at issue

in the letter you received with this form. Note: You can use the back of this page or attach additional

pages if you need more space.

Form 12507 (12-1999) Department of the Treasury — Internal Revenue Service

www.irs.gov

Catalog Number 28728D

Innocent Spouse Statement

I, __________________________________, residing at ___________________________________

,

make the following statement to be used in the determination of innocent spouse relief

for Mr. / Mrs. _____________________________________________: a

Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this statement, and to the best of

my knowledge and belief, it is true, correct and complete.

My Signature Date
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Salvatore Simone, Appellant.

Appeals by defendant from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, rendered May 17,1978, convicting him of two counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing concurrent sentences of imprisonment of three years to life; and (2) (by permission) an order of the same court, dated September 25, 1979, denying his motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 (subd 1) to vacate the said judgment. Judgment modified, on the law, by reducing the sentences to two concurrent indeterminate terms of imprisonment of one year to life. As so modified, judgment affirmed. Order reversed, on the law, and case remitted to Criminal Term for a hearing and further proceedings consistent herewith. Defendant was previously convicted of two counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and was sentenced to concurrent terms of imprisonment of one year to life. That judgment was reversed *(People v Simone,*59 AD2d 918). Following the retrial, defendant was convicted of the same charges and was sentenced to concurrent terms of three years to life. In the absence of objective information appearing affirmatively on the record concerning identifiable conduct on the part of the defendant occurring after the time of the original sentencing which would justify the imposition of a harsher sentence, it was error for the court to have imposed a greater sentence following the retrial (see *North Carolina v Pearce,*395 US 711, 726; *People v Yannicelli,*47 AD2d 911, mod 40 NY2d 598). Additionally, under the circumstances here presented, a hearing should be held on defendant’s application to vacate the judgment. We have examined defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit (see *People v Sapia,*41 NY2d 160, cert den 434 US 823; *People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230, 242). Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Titone and Mangano, JJ., concur.
#### In re SPERANZA. WALSH v. CITY OF NEW YORK.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July 12, 1906.)

In an action by Charles Walsh against the city of New York. W. H. Harding, Jr., for Speranza. B. Patterson, for Walsh.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3434 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain synthetic staple fibers that are 

carded, combed, or otherwise processed for spinning. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 6, 2006 

Mr. BURR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain synthetic staple 

fibers that are carded, combed, or otherwise processed 

for spinning. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ACRYLIC OR MODACRYLIC SYNTHETIC STAPLE 

4 FIBERS, CARDED, COMBED, OR OTHERWISE 

5 PROCESSED FOR SPINNING. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•S 3434 IS 

‘‘ 9902.06.43 Synthetic staple fibers, 

carded, combed, or otherwise 

processed for spinning: 

acrylic or modacrylic (provided for in subheading 

5506.30.00) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE 

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819 

DCN: SE03805

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
# Subpart 332.4 - Advance Payments for Non-Commercial Items

**Parent topic:**PART 332 - CONTRACT FINANCING

## 332.402 General.

(e) The head of the contracting activity (HCA) (non-delegable) shall make determinations related to advanced payments and assure compliance with FAR 32.402.   

## 332.407 Interest.

(d) The HCA (non-delegable) shall make the determinations in FAR 32.407(d).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

December 29, 2006

NOTICE OF ERROR

To: All Counsel of Record

Case Style: May's Distributing Company, Inc. v. Total Containment, Inc. et al 

Case Number: 2:06-cv-00702-MEF

Referenced Pleading: Intervenor COMPLAINT

Docket Entry Number: 62

The referenced pleading was filed on ***December 28, 2006*** in this case and 

is hereby STRICKEN from the docket, as the court has not granted leave to file this pleading.

This is an erroneous docket entry. Parties are instructed to disregard #62 docketing entry,

which has been stricken from the record as a docketing error.

Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 63 Filed 12/29/2006 Page 1 of 1