alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

WILLIAM D. BOWDEN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No.: 2:06-cv-665

)

MISSION PETROLEUM CARRIERS, )

ANTONIO MARTINEZ NAVARRO )

)

Defendants. )

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO EXTEND THE

DISCOVERY DEADLINE

Come now the Defendants, Antonio Navarro and Mission Petroleum Carriers, Inc., and

pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure respectfully request that this Honorable Court

allow the parties to extend their current discovery deadline by 30 days to May 15, 2007. One of

the Defendants, Antonio Navarro, is an individual living in Houston, Texas. The undersigned

has difficulty in scheduling meetings with him for the purpose of completing discovery

responses. While Mr. Navarro has expressed a willingness to participate in the defense of this

matter, his work schedule makes it very difficult for him to make contact with the undersigned. 

Therefore, and with the agreement of Plaintiff’s counsel, the undersigned is respectfully

requesting this Honorable Court an additional 30 days in which to complete discovery so as to

accommodate Mr. Navarro’s schedule. The parties do not seek to move other deadlines at this

time.

_/s/Caroline T. Pryor________________

VINCENT A. NOLETTO, JR. (NOL008)

CAROLINE T. PRYOR (PRY005)

Attorneys for Defendants

Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 27 Filed 04/03/2007 Page 1 of 2
OF COUNSEL:

CARR ALLISON

P.O. Box 1126

Daphne, AL 36526

251-626-9340

ctp@carrallison.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have on this 3rd of April, 2007, served a copy of the foregoing

pleading upon all counsel of record via the Court’s electronic filing system.

James Bodin

McPhillips, Shinbaum & Gill, L.L.P.

Post Office Box 64

Montgomery, Alabama 36101-0064

/s/Caroline T. Pryor______________

OF COUNSEL

Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 27 Filed 04/03/2007 Page 2 of 2
1511.000 Scope of part.

This part implements FAR part 11 and provides policy and procedures for describing Agency needs.

Parent topic: PART 1511 - DESCRIBING AGENCY NEEDS
Case 2:06-cv-00736-WKW-SRW Document 10 Filed 10/31/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00736-WKW-SRW Document 10 Filed 10/31/2006 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

November 20, 2006

NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE

To: ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD

Case Style: Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Joseph Donald Prather, et al.

Case Number: 3:06-cv-733-MHT

Referenced Pleading(s): Notice of Filing Plaintiff’s Initial Disclosures

Docket Entry Number(s): 16

The referenced pleading was electronically filed on 11/17/2006 in this case and is not in

compliance with the local rules and/or administrative procedures of this court. 

******This pleading is regarding discovery and is not allowed pursuant to Local Rule 5.1

NON-FILING OF CIVIL DISCOVERY.

The pleading is hereby STRICKEN from the record and the parties are instructed to

disregard the entry of this pleading on the court’s docket. Parties should be aware that the

striking of this entry does not affect their responsibilities as to the discovery process.

Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 17 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 1 of 1
Local Rule 5.1

NON-FILING OF CIVIL DISCOVERY

Unless the Court directs otherwise, in all civil actions other than inmate complaints

challenging the conditions of confinement:

A. Interrogatories, requests for production, requests for admissions and responses

thereto, and notices of depositions shall be served in accordance with Rule 5(b), FED.R.CIV.P.,

but shall not be filed with the Clerk except upon order of the Court or for use at trial or in

connection with motions. The party responsible for service of the discovery material shall retain

the original and become custodian.

B. No depositions shall be filed with the Clerk unless the Court directs otherwise, or

unless in support of or in opposition to a motion. Counsel who notices a deposition shall be the

custodian of the deposition and shall maintain the original for filing if the Court so directs.

C. If discovery materials are germane to any motion or response, only the relevant

material need be filed with the motion or response.

D. During the pendency of any case the custodian of any discovery material shall

provide to counsel for all other parties reasonable access to the material and an opportunity to

duplicate the material at the expense of the copying party, and any other person may, with leave

of Court, obtain a copy of any discovery material from its custodian upon payment of the expense

of the copy.

E. When documentation of discovery not previously in the record is needed for appeal

purposes, upon an application and order of the Court, or by stipulation of counsel, the necessary

discovery papers shall be filed with the Clerk.

F. Any discovery material, depositions and trial exhibits filed with the Clerk will be

disposed of by the Clerk as set out by M.D. Ala. LR 5.2.

Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 17-2 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 1 of 1
§ 986.64 Accounting. ( a ) Assessments collected in excess of expenses incurred shall be accounted for in accordance with one of the following: ( 1 ) Excess funds not retained in a reserve, as provided in paragraph (a)(2) of this section shall be refunded proportionately to the persons from whom they were collected; or
( 2 ) The Council, with the approval of the Secretary, may carry over excess funds into subsequent fiscal periods as reserves: *Provided*, That funds already in reserves do not equal approximately three fiscal years' expenses. Such reserve funds may be used: ( i ) To defray expenses during any fiscal period prior to the time assessment income is sufficient to cover such expenses;
( ii ) To cover deficits incurred during any fiscal period when assessment income is less than expenses;
( iii ) To defray expenses incurred during any period when any or all provisions of this part are suspended or are inoperative; and
( iv ) To cover necessary expenses of liquidation in the event of termination of this part.
( b ) Upon such termination, any funds not required to defray the necessary expenses of liquidation shall be disposed of in such manner as the Secretary may determine to be appropriate. To the extent practical, such funds shall be returned pro rata to the persons from whom such funds were collected.
( c ) All funds received by the Council pursuant to the provisions of this part shall be used solely for the purposes specified in this part and shall be accounted for in the manner provided for in this part. The Secretary may at any time require the Council and its members to account for all receipts and disbursements.
( d ) Upon the removal or expiration of the term of office of any member of the Council, such member shall account for all receipts and disbursements and deliver all property and funds in their possession to the Council, and shall execute such assignments and other instruments as may be necessary or appropriate to vest in the Council full title to all of the property, funds, and claims vested in such member pursuant to this part.
( e ) The Council may make recommendations to the Secretary for one or more of the members thereof, or any other person, to act as a trustee for holding records, funds, or any other Council property during periods of suspension of this subpart, or during any period or periods when regulations are not in effect and if the Secretary determines such action appropriate, he or she may direct that such person or persons shall act as trustee or trustees for the Council.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-736-WKW

)

SEVENTY FOUR THOUSAND SEVEN )

HUNDRED ($74,700) DOLLARS IN )

UNITED STATES CURRENCY, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

Upon consideration of plaintiff’s Motion to Continue (Doc. # 20) filed on June 15, 2007,

it is hereby

ORDERED that the hearing on Claimant’s Motion to Suppress presently set for June 26,

2007, is reset for 2:00 p.m. on September 6, 2007. The pretrial hearing will also be conducted on

this date. 

DONE this 19th day of June, 2007.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00736-WKW-SRW Document 21 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 1 of 1
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN INSURANCE )

COMPANY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) Civil Action No. 2:06cv717-ID

v. )

)

)

CAROL THORN, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

Before the court is a motion for summary judgment, filed by the Kirkindoll

Defendants on October 5, 2007. (Doc. No. 90.) Plaintiff is DIRECTED to file a response

to said motion on or before October 23, 2007. The Kirkindoll Defendants may file a reply,

if desired, on or before October 30, 2007. 

Done this 9th day of October, 2007.

 /s/ Ira DeMent 

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 93 Filed 10/09/2007 Page 1 of 1
e Memorandum 

U.S. Department of 

Transportation 

Office of the Secretary 

of Transportation 

Subject: Request for Ext^sion at Kingman, Page, Prescott, and 

mhow Low,/?yi2 

From: Dennis J. DeVany, Chief ^cf-^ 

EAS & Domestic Analysis Division, X-53 

Date: December 21,2010 

Reply to Michael Martin, 

Attn, of: X-53 Ext. 66494 

To: Dockets Operations, M-30 

Order 2010-11-17, November 17, 2010, requested proposals for Essential Air Service 

(EAS) at Kingman, Page, Prescott, and Show Low to be submitted by December 21. 

On December 21, the Department received a request for an extension from Gulf stream 

International Airlines (Gulfstream) to extend the submission deadline for proposals for 

the four communities to January 6, 2011. 

After reaching out to the communities for their feedback and receiving no objections, we 

are hereby granting the extension based on the request from Gulfstream. Proposals for 

Kingman, Page, Prescott, and Show Low are now due no later than Thursday, January 6, 

2011.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Trade Commission

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Sandra M. Peay, Contact Representative or Renee Chapman, Contact Representative, Federal Trade Commission, Premerger Notification Office, Bureau of Competition, Room H-303, Washington, DC 20580, (202) 326-3100.

By Direction of the Commission.

Donald S. Clark,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-31092 Filed 12-10-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6925

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

HARRY WAYNE SHAUCK,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, Chief District 

Judge. (1:02-cr-00391-CCB-1; 1:13-cv-03122-CCB)

Submitted: October 21, 2014 Decided: October 24, 2014

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harry Wayne Shauck, Appellant Pro Se. Bonnie S. Greenberg, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Harry Wayne Shauck seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) 

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Shauck has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability, deny Shauck’s motion to 

appoint counsel, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 983.29 Shelled pistachios.

*Shelled pistachios* means pistachio kernels, or portions of kernels, after the pistachio shells have been removed.

[69 FR 17850, Apr. 4, 2004. Redesignated at 74 FR 56539, Nov. 2, 2009]
Subpart 1315.2 - Solicitation and Receipt of

Proposals and Information

Parent topic: PART 1315 - CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION

1315.204 Contract format.

The designee authorized to grant exemptions from the uniform contract format is set forth in CAM

1301.70.

1315.204-570 Part IV representations and instructions.

(a) Section L, Instructions, conditions, and notices to offerors or respondents.

(1) The contracting officer shall insert the provision 1352.215-70, Proposal Preparation, in all

solicitations. Contracting officers should tailor the provision to best meet the Government's needs.

Information requested from offerors in Volume II-Technical Proposal, must correspond to the

evaluation factors. Contracting officers should not request information that will not be evaluated in

accord with the stated technical evaluation factors. Should electronic submission be allowed by the

CO, specific instructions must be added.

(2) Insert a provision similar to 1352.215-71, Instructions for Oral Presentations, in solicitations

when oral presentations will be used. Contracting officers shall tailor the provision to suit their

acquisition.

(3) The contracting officer shall insert the provision 1352.215-72, Inquiries, in solicitations as

determined by the CO. This provision may be modified to satisfy the needs of specific procurements.

(b) Section M, Evaluation factors for award.

(1) The contracting officer shall insert provision 1352.215-73, Evaluation Quantities-Indefinite

Quantity Contract, in solicitations for indefinite quantity and requirements contracts, as appropriate.

This provision may be modified to satisfy the needs of specific procurements.

(2) The contracting officer shall insert the provision similar to 1352.215-74, Best Value Evaluation,

for competitive, best value procurements, tailoring the language as appropriate. If clause

1352.215-74, Best Value Evaluation, is used, then clause 1352.215-75 Evaluation Criteria, must be

used.

(3) The contracting officer shall insert a provision in all solicitations similar to 1352.215-75,

Evaluation Criteria, to specify evaluation criteria, tailoring the language as appropriate. If the basis

for award is lowest price technically acceptable, this must be stated.

(4) The contracting officer shall insert provision 1352.215-76, Cost or Pricing Data, in all

solicitations when cost or pricing data is required under FAR subpart 15.4.
1315.209 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.

The designee authorized to waive the examination of records by the Comptroller General is set forth

in CAM 1301.70.
# Subpart 952.0 - General

**Parent topic:**PART 952 - SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES

## 952.000 Scope of part.

This part implements FAR part 52 which sets forth contract clauses for use in connection with the acquisition of personal property and nonpersonal services (including construction), and supplements, as well as modifies, FAR part 52 by prescribing certain modifications to be made to FAR clauses when used in Department of Energy (DOE) contracts and specifying certain Department of Energy Acquisition Regulation clauses to be used in addition to or in place of such FAR clauses. 

## 952.001 General policy.

It is DOE policy to use the prescribed FAR and DOE contract clauses wherever practicable. Uniformity in the use of contract clauses helps to ensure impartial treatment of all contractors, expedites negotiation and contract review, and facilitates contract administration.
Credit
Agreement Amendment Feb 2016


 





 


1006
– 2540 Daniel-Johnson Blvd.


Laval,
Québec


H7T
2S3


 


Amendment
to the Credit Agreement


dated
July 10, 2017 (including all previous amendments thereto), the “Agreement”


between
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (“CIBC”) and Les Systèmes d’Écran Strong/MDI Inc. / Strong/MDI
Screen Systems Inc. (the “Borrower”)


 


Amendments.
The Agreement is amended as follows:


New
facility


 


Business
Credit Card Facility


 


	Credit
    Limit: 	CAD$
    50,000.
	 	 
	Purpose:
    	Purchase
    and payment of goods and services.
	 	 
	Repayment:
    	On
    demand in accordance with the CIBC Business Credit Card Agreement
	 	 (Business
    Liability)
	 	 
	Documentation:
    	CIBC
    Business Credit Card Agreement (Business Liability).


 


Other
Provisions


 


	Schedule
    B: 	The
    attached Schedule B, which contains certain additional provisions applicable to the Business Credit Card Facility and certain
    definitions, forms part of this Letter.


 


	Confirmation:
    As revised by this Amendment, the Agreement remains in full force.
	 
	Dated
    as of: November 14, 2017


 


	For
    CIBC:	 	For
    the Borrower: 	 	For
    the Borrower:
	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	/s/
    Denis Lemire	 	By:	/s/ François
    Barrette	 	By:	/s/ Suzanne
    Thouin
	Name:	Denis
    Lemire	 	Name:	François
    Barrette	 	Name:	Suzanne
    Thouin
	Title:	Manager,
    Commercial Banking	 	Title:	General
    Manager	 	Title:	Executive
    Director


 


	For
    Ballantyne Strong Inc.	 	For
    Ballantyne Strong Inc. 
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ D.
    Kyle Cerminara	 	By:	/s/ Lance
    V. Schulz
	Name:	D.
    Kyle Cerminara	 	Name:	Lance
    V. Schulz
	Title:	Chairman
    & Chief Executive Officer	 	Title:	Senior
    Vice-President, Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 3.1

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                         OF CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                             BERKSHIRE BANCORP INC.

            Adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242
             of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware

          The undersigned, being a duly authorized officer of Berkshire Bancorp
Inc. (the "Corporation"), a corporation existing under the laws of the State of
Delaware, does hereby certify as follows:

     1. The Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby amended by
striking out Section 4.1 of Article IV thereof in its entirety and by
substituting in lieu thereof the following new Section 4.1:

          "4.1 Capital Stock. The total number of shares of capital stock which
     the Corporation shall have authority to issue is twelve million
     (12,000,000) shares, of which ten million (10,000,000) shares shall be
     common stock, par value $.10 per share ("Common Stock"), and two million
     (2,000,000) shares shall be preferred stock, par value $.01 per share
     ("Preferred Stock").

          The presently issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock, including
     any treasury stock, shall be combined (through a reverse stock split) in
     the ratio of one (1) share of Common Stock for each ten (10) shares of
     Common Stock currently issued and outstanding."

     2. That such amendment has been duly adopted by the stockholders of the
Corporation, all in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

     3. The effective date of this Certificate of Amendment shall be 5:00 P.M.
EDT on May 18, 2004.

Dated: May 18, 2004

                                    BERKSHIRE BANCORP INC.


                                    By: /s/ Steven Rosenberg
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                    Name: Steven Rosenberg
                                    Title: President and Chief Financial Officer


                                       35
Part 5236 - CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS       Subpart 5236.2 - SPECIAL ASPECTS OF CONTRACTING FOR CONSTRUCTION                                                         5236.270 Expediting construction contracts.                                                                             Subpart 5236.6 - ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SERVICES                                                         5236.601 Policy.    Subpart 5236.2 - SPECIAL ASPECTS OF CONTRACTING FOR CONSTRUCTION     5236.270 Expediting construction contracts.    (a) Where additional costs are to be incurred, NAVFACENGCOM is responsible for obtaining required agency head approval and certification.Subpart 5236.6 - ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SERVICES     5236.601 Policy.    (1) NAVFACENGCOM is responsible for any required Congressional notification.
#### Bi-Economy Market, Inc., Appellant, v Harleysville Insurance Company of New York et al., Respondents.

Submitted October 22, 2007;

decided November 15, 2007

Reported below, 37 AD3d 1184.

Motion by New York Insurance Association et al. for leave to appear amici curiae on the appeal herein granted only to the extent that the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and 24 copies filed within seven days.
#### REED et al., Respondents, v. JOYCE et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

September 26, 1906.)

Action by George D. Reed and another against Minnie L. Joyce and others.

PER CURIAM.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, unless the appellants shall, within 30 days from date of service of a copy of the order herein, together with notice of entry thereof, file and serve the printed papers on appeal, as provided by rule 41, and pay to the respondents’ attorney $10 costs of this motion; in which event said motion is denied, without costs.
1450.104-3 Special procedures for unusually

hazardous or nuclear risks.

The CO shall submit the proposed Memorandum of Decision including the contractor's request for

indemnification and the information required from the CO, to the SOL for review and approval. If the

SOL approves the proposed Memorandum of Decision, it shall be submitted through the HCA, to the

Director, PAM, for approval or disapproval by the Secretary.

Parent topic: Subpart 1450.1 - Extraordinary Contractual Actions