alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex10-42.htm


    

      EXHIBIT
10.42

       

      CALENDAR
2010 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

       

      


      
        	
                Compensation
      Element

              	
                Amount

              
	
                Board
      Cash Compensation

              	
                Annual
      retainer - $60,0001

              
	 
      	
                Per
      meeting fees: $2,000 in-person, $1,000 telephonic2

              
	
                Annual
      Equity Compensation

              	
                -Option
      to purchase 1,667 shares of Common Stock3

                -Restricted
      stock units for 3,333 shares of Common Stock3

                -Both
      grants vest in 12 equal monthly installments following the date of
      grant

              
	
                Annual
      Lead Director Cash Compensation

              	
                Additional
      retainer: $24,0001

              
	
                Committee
      Member Cash Compensation

              	
                Annual
      retainer:
      1

                -Audit
      Committee: $10,000

                -Compensation
      Committee: $10,000

                -Nominating
      and Governance Committee: $10,000

                Per
      meeting fees: $1,5002

              
	
                Annual
      Committee Chair Cash Compensation

              	
                Additional
      retainer:
      1

                -Audit
      Committee: $10,000

                -Compensation
      Committee: $10,000

                -Nominating
      and Governance Committee: $10,000

              


      

       

       

      ____________________________

      1
Directors may elect to receive cash retainers in the form of restricted stock
units with value equal to 133% of the forgone cash compensation and which vest
in full on the day immediately prior to the annual meeting of stockholders held
following the grant date.

       

      2
Meeting fees may be deferred and converted into share units pursuant to the
Sanmina-SCI Deferred Compensation Plan for Outside Directors.

        
        3
Represents amount of equity granted to Board members elected at annual meetings
of stockholders. For members appointed between annual meetings of stockholders,
grant amounts are pro rated based upon the time between the last annual meeting
of stockholders and the date of
appointment.
2906.501 Requirement.

The Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management must appoint a Competition Advocate

for the Department of Labor. The appointment will be predicated on an understanding of the

competition requirements in the FAR, and particularly small business programs.

Parent topic: Subpart 2906.5 - Competition Advocate
#### Vincent Riportella, Respondent, v Audrey Riportella, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered November 22, 1978, which, *inter alia,*awarded additional legal fees of $3,500 to defendant’s attorney, modified, on the law and the facts, by increasing the award of additional legal fees to the sum of $5,500, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs. Appeal from the order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered November 17, 1978, is dismissed as academic, without costs, since that order was subsumed by the judgment entered November 22, 1978. Defendant made 22 motions in the course of this proceeding. Many of the motions were prompted by plaintiffs failure to make the temporary alimony *504payments on time. Furthermore, the trial covered five days. Under these circumstances, defendant’s attorney is entitled to an additional $2,000 in legal fees. We find no merit to the other points raised by the defendant. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Fein, Sullivan, Ross and Bloom, JJ.
EX-10.18



 Exhibit 10.18 

AMENDMENT 
 This Amendment
(the “Amendment”) to the License Agreement dated as of December 23, 2005 (the “Agreement”), is effective as of January 6, 2009 (“Amendment Effective Date”), between Eli Lilly and Company, a
corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Indiana (“Lilly”), and Targanta Therapeutics Corporation, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware (“Targanta” or
“Licensee”), successor to InterMune, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware (“InterMune”), as purchaser of all rights, title and interest related to oritivancin from
InterMune. 
 WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Agreement to clarify a certain provision thereof; 

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and lawful consideration, the sufficiency of which is acknowledged and agreed, the
Parties, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows: 
 Article 1.         Amendment to
Definition of Product. The last sentence of Section 1.25 of the Agreement is deleted in its entirety. 
 Article 2.
        Effect on Agreement. Except as amended by this Amendment, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. After the Amendment Effective Date, every reference in the Agreement to
the “Agreement” shall mean the Agreement as amended by this Amendment. 
 Article 3.
        Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which will constitute one and the same instrument. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment as of the Amendment Effective Date.

  

			
	ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
		
	By:	 	/s/ Gino Santini
		 	  

		 	 Name:  Gino Santini

Title:   Senior Vice President

	
	TARGANTA THERAPEUTICS CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	/s/ Mark Leuchtenberger
		 	  

		 	 Name:  Mark Leuchtenberger

Title:   President & CEO
2919.812 Contract administration.

(a) Contracting officers, or designees, must conduct periodic evaluations of the performance of an

8(a) contract at various stages of the contract period of performance. Any problems encountered

during the performance evaluation, which cannot be resolved, must be referred to the Office of

Small Business Programs for subsequent review and discussion with the appropriate SBA official.

(b) The Office of Small Business Programs and the SBA should be notified at least 45 days before

initiating final action to terminate an 8(a) contract.

Parent topic: Subpart 2919.8 - Contracting with the Small Business Administration (The 8(a)

Program)
Case 2:06-cv-00680-LES-CSC Document 4 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 1 of 1
NBS

PUBLICATIONS

NATL INST, OF STAND & TECH

A111D7 ESnil

-qc—

100

• U57

#731

1987

C2

Research Information Center

National Bureau of Standards

Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899

FUNDAMENTAL

PHYSICAL

CONSTANTS

1986

CODATA

Recommended

Values

compiled

by

E.

Richard

Cohen

Rockwell

International

Science

Center

Thousand

Oaks,

CA

91360,

USA

and

f

Barry

N.

Taylor

National

Bureau

of

Standards

D

Gaithersburg,

MD

20899,

USA

The

data

tabulated

here

are

abstracted

from

the

report

of

the

CODATA

Task

Group

on

Fundamental

Constants

(CODATA

f

Bulletin

No

63,

November,

1986)'.

Digits

in

parentheses

represent

one

standard

deviation

uncertainty

in

the

final

digits

«

of

the

given

value,

based

on

a

least-squares

analysis

with

)f

five

variables

and

17

degrees

of

freedom.

These

values

are

recommended

for

general

use

by

CODATA

(the

Committee

on

Data

for

Science

and

Technology

of

the

International

Council

il

of

Scientific

Unions,

51

Blvd

de

Montmorency,

75016

Paris,

|,f

France).

Standards,

Special

Publication

731,

Issued

July

1987.

1

Supersedes

NBS

SP

398,

August

1974

•

,a

aUo

J.

Res.

Natl.

Bur.

Stand.

92,

85

(1987)

Supported

by

NBS

through

the

Office

of

Standard

Reference

Data

and

by

Rockwell

International

through

its

Independent

Research

and

Development

Program

1

1

DATE DUE

1
Subpart 1537.1 - Service Contracts - General

Parent topic: PART 1537 - SERVICE CONTRACTING

1537.110 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.

The following clauses are prescribed for service contracts. They may also be used in research and

development contracts when applicable (see 1535.007-70).

(a) The Contracting Officer shall insert the clause at 1552.237-70, Contract Publication Review

Procedures, in solicitations and contracts when the products of the contract are subject to contract

publication review.

(b) The Contracting Officer shall insert a clause substantially the same as the clause at 1552.237-71,

Technical Direction, in solicitations and contracts where the Contracting Officer intends to delegate

authority to issue technical direction to the Contracting Officer's Representative(s).

(c) The Contracting Officer shall insert the clause at 1552.237-72, Key Personnel, in solicitations and

contracts when it is necessary for contract performance to identify Contractor key personnel.

Contracting Officers have the flexibility to identify the required number of days of key personnel

commitment during the early stages of contractor performance. The length of time will be based on

the requirements of individual acquisitions when continued assignment is essential to the successful

implementation of the program's mission. Therefore, Contracting Officers may use a clause

substantially the same as in 48 CFR 1552.237-72, regarding substitution of key personnel.

Contracting Officers may include a different number of days in excess of the ninety (90) days

included in this clause, if approved at one level above the Contracting Officer.

(d) The Contracting Officer shall insert the clause at 1552.237-74, Publicity, in solicitations and

contracts pertaining to the removal or remedial activities under the Comprehensive Environmental

Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA).

(e) The Contracting Officer shall insert the clause at 1552.237-75, Paperwork Reduction Act, in

solicitations and contracts requiring the collection of identical information from (10) or more public

respondents.

(f) To ensure that Agency contracts are administered so as to avoid creating an improper employeremployee relationship, contracting officers shall insert the contract clause at 1552.237-76,

“Government-Contractor Relations”, in all solicitations and contracts for non-personal services that

exceed the simplified acquisition threshold.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, John Isbrandtsen, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K/A of Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2012-6 (the "Exchange Act periodic
    reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
    in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
    disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
    fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
    material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K/A.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    Cenlar, FSB as Servicer, First Republic Bank as Servicer, PHH Mortgage
    Corporation as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Custodian and Wells
    Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master Servicer and Securities Administrator.

    Dated:   December 11, 2013


    /s/ John Isbrandtsen
    Signature

    Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Somsak Chivavibul,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
covered by this report on Form 10-K of SLM Student Loan Trust 2012-7 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my
knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required under this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as indenture trustee.

Date: March 27, 2014



|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/ SOMSAK CHIVAVIBUL                                                
|Somsak Chivavibul                                                    
|President and Chief Financial Officer (Senior Securitization Officer)
|SLM Funding LLC
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Sanford Harris, Appellant, v. Vincent R. Mancusi, as Warden of Attica State Prison, Respondent.

Judgement unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We agree with the conclusions reached by Wyoming County Court in this proceeding. The *874facts distinguish this case from our holding in *People ex rel. Combs*v. *La Vallee*(29 A D 2d 128). We do not reach or pass upon the effect, if any, that the recent amendment (L. 1968, ch. 203) may have had upon the conclusion reached in *Combs (supra).*(Appeal from judgment of Wyoming County Court dismissing writ of habeas corpus.) Present — Goldman, P. J., Marsh, Witmer, Moule and Bastow, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Raymond M. Weinstein et al., Appellants, v City of New York Department of Housing Preservation and Development et al., Respondents.

Submitted June 25, 2007;

decided July 2, 2007

Reported below, 39 AD3d 764.

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

OWEN J. ROGAL, D.D.S., )

P.C. d/b/a THE PAIN CENTER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 3:06cv728-MHT

) 

SKILSTAF, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that plaintiff show cause, if any there

be, in writing by October 27, 2006, as to why defendant’s

motion to consolidate for discovery purposes only (doc.

no. 29) should not be granted.

DONE, this the 18th day of October, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 32 Filed 10/18/2006 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 31.1 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)

I, Todd Axelrod, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Gallery of
History, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
quarter period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.

Date:  May 15, 2007
                                   /s/ TODD AXELROD
                                   _______________________
                                   Todd Axelrod
                                   Chief Executive Office
Motion Granted; Order filed June 12, 2012

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 12

- 00530

- CV

____________ DALLAS CITY LIMITS PROPERTY CO., L.P. , Appellant

V. AUSTIN JOCKEY CLUB, LTD., CRADY, JEWETT & MCCULLEY, L.L.P., AND

KTAGS DOWNS HOLDING COMPANY, L.L.C, Appellee s

On Appeal from the 127th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2010

- 16733



### ORDER
This is an appeal from a judgment signed May 24, 2012. On June 11, 201 2, appellant filed a motion in this court requesting temporary stay of post

- judgment proceedings pending this court’s review of the trial court’s order setting appeal bond

. See Tex. R. App. P. 24.4.
It appears from the facts stated in the motion that ap pellant ’ s rights will be prejudiced unless immediate temporary relief is granted. Accordingly, we grant the motion and issue the following order.We therefore ORDER that post

- judgment proceedings in the court below be stayed in trial court cause number 20 10

- 16733 , styled Crady, Jewett & McCulley v. Austin Jockey Club, Ltd., Dallas City Limits Property Co., L.P. and KTAGS Downs Holding Company, LLC

. The proceedings are stayed until decision by this court of appellant’s motion to review order on supersedeas bond or until further orders of this

court.

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of The Saint James Company on Form 10-Q for
the period ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, Dale Paisley, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The
Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





July 30,
2009





/s/ Dale PaisleyDale
      Paisley,Chief
      Financial Officer
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 179 (Thursday, September 15, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 63478]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-22220]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9952-46-OECA]

National Environmental Justice Advisory Council; Notice of 
Charter Renewal

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of charter renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Notice is hereby given that the Environmental Protection Agency 
(EPA) has determined that, in accordance with the provisions of the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. App.2, the National 
Environmental Justice Advisory Council (NEJAC) is a necessary committee 
which is in the public interest. Accordingly, NEJAC will be renewed for 
an additional two-year period. The purpose of the NEJAC is to provide 
advice and recommendations to the Administrator about issues associated 
with integrating environmental justice concerns into EPA's outreach 
activities, public policies, science, regulatory, enforcement, and 
compliance decisions.
    Inquiries may be directed to Matthew Tejada, NEJAC Designated 
Federal Officer, U.S. EPA, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., (Mail Code 
2201A), Washington, DC 20460.

    Dated: August 4, 2016.
Larry Starfield,
Principal Deputy Assistants Administrator, Office of Enforcement and 
Compliance Assurance.
[FR Doc. 2016-22220 Filed 9-14-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```