alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.19





FIRST AMENDMENT TO
AMENDED AND RESTATED ON ASSIGNMENT, INC. 
2012 EMPLOYMENT INDUCEMENT INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN 
 
This First Amendment (“First Amendment”) to the Amended and Restated On Assignment, Inc. 2012 Employment Inducement Incentive Award Plan (the “Plan”) is adopted by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of On Assignment, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), effective as of June 5, 2015. Capitalized terms used in this First Amendment and not otherwise defined shall have the same meanings assigned to them in the Plan. 


RECITALS
		
	A. 
	The Company currently maintains the Plan.


		
	B.
	Pursuant to Section 12.1 of the Plan, the Board has the authority to amend the Plan. 


		
	C.
	The Board believes it to be in the best interest of the Company to amend the Plan to increase the Share Limit. 




AMENDMENT
		
	 1.
	The first sentence of Section 3.1(a) of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 


“Subject to Section 3.1(b) and Section 12.2 hereof, the aggregate number of Shares which may be issued or transferred pursuant to Awards under the Plan shall be one million two hundred thirty-five thousand eight hundred sixty-one (1,235,861) (the “Share Limit”).”


This First Amendment shall be and hereby is incorporated in and forms a part of the Plan.  Except as expressly provided herein, all terms and conditions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board has caused this First Amendment to be executed by a duly authorized officer of the Company as of the 5th day of June, 2015.


	
			
	 
	 
	On Assignment, Inc.

	 
	 
	By: /s/Peter. T. Dameris



	 
	 
	Peter T. Dameris

	 
	 
	President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Wendie Peters, an Infant, by Her Father and Natural Guardian, Daniel Peters, et al., Respondents, v Union Free School District No. 11, Board of Education, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant school district appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated May 25, *6141979, which granted plaintiffs’ motion to renew and, upon renewal, granted plaintiffs’ motion to amend the complaint by increasing the *ad damnum*clause. Order modified by deleting therefrom the provision which granted the motion to amend, and substituting therefore a provision adhering to the original determination denying the motion to amend, but without prejudice to renew at the close of the plaintiffs’ case at the trial on damages. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Appellant is granted leave, if it be so advised, to conduct further physical and oral examinations of plaintiffs. Such examinations shall proceed at times and places to be fixed in written notices of not less than 10 days, to be given by appellant within 30 days after entry of the order to be made hereon, or at such times and places as the parties may agree. Following a jury finding of liability at a bifurcated trial, plaintiffs moved to amend the complaint by increasing the *ad damnum*clause from $50,000 to $500,000. The motion was predicated upon a re-evaluation of the injuries sustained by the infant plaintiff. In view of the fact that the motion to amend was not made until after the liability phase of the proceedings, and in the absence of an allegation of newly discovered or aggravated injury, it was an improvident exercise of discretion for Special Term to grant the motion to amend on the papers submitted. However, we are of the view that plaintiffs should be afforded an opportunity to demonstrate that the injuries sustained could properly result in a verdict in excess of that prayed for in the original complaint. Accordingly, the motion is denied with leave to renew at the close of the plaintiffs’ case at the trial on damages. Mollen, P. J., Titone, O’Connor, Cohalan and Hargett, JJ., concur.
Cite as: 595 U. S. ____ (2021) 1 

Statement of BREYER, J. 

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 

CARL WAYNE BUNTION v. BOBBY LUMPKIN, 

DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL 

JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION 

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED 

STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT 

No. 20–8043. Decided October 4, 2021 

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. 

Statement of JUSTICE BREYER respecting the denial of 

certiorari. 

Carl Wayne Buntion was convicted of capital murder in

Texas and sentenced to death in 1991. App. to Pet. for Cert.

18. Because his original sentencing was unconstitutional,

he was granted a resentencing and again sentenced to 

death in 2012. Id., at 18–21. He has now been on death 

row under threat of execution for 30 years. He tells us that 

he has spent the last 20 of those years in solitary confinement, isolated in his cell for 23 hours a day. Pet. for Cert. 

1. He further tells us that, at age 77, he is now the oldest 

prisoner on Texas’ death row. Ibid. Texas does not dispute 

these facts. Buntion now asks the Court to consider 

whether execution after such an extended delay is cruel and 

unusual in violation of the Eighth Amendment. 

I recognize the procedural obstacles that make it difficult 

for the Court to grant certiorari in Buntion’s case. I write, 

however, to underscore how this case illustrates the problems with the death penalty that I identified in my dissenting opinion in Glossip v. Gross, 576 U. S. 863, 908 (2015),

and in a number of other cases since then, see, e.g., Hamm 

v. Dunn, 583 U. S. ___ (2018) (statement respecting denial 

of application for stay and denial of certiorari); Smith v. 

Ryan, 581 U. S. ___ (2017) (statement respecting denial of

certiorari). I continue to believe that excessive delay both 
 

2 BUNTION v. LUMPKIN 

Statement of BREYER, J. 

“undermines the death penalty’s penological rationale” and 

is “in and of itself . . . especially cruel because it ‘subjects

death row inmates to decades of especially severe, dehumanizing conditions of confinement.’” Glossip, supra, at 

925. The Court has previously recognized that the uncertainty of waiting in prison under the threat of execution, 

even for a span of just four weeks, is “one of the most horrible feelings to which [a person] can be subjected.” In re 

Medley, 134 U. S. 160, 172 (1890). On top of that, solitary 

confinement bears “‘a further terror and peculiar mark of 

infamy.’” Id., at 170; see also Davis v. Ayala, 576 U. S. 257, 

289 (2015) (Kennedy, J., concurring) (“Years on end of neartotal isolation exact a terrible price”). Buntion has now 

been subjected to those conditions for decades. His lengthy

confinement, and the confinement of others like him, calls 

into question the constitutionality of the death penalty 

and reinforces the need for this Court, or other courts, to 

consider that question in an appropriate case.
1602.000-70 Scope of part.

This part defines words and terms commonly used in this regulation.

Parent topic: PART 1602—DEFINITIONS OF WORDS AND TERMS
§ 984.50 Grade, quality, and size regulations. ( a ) The Board may recommend, subject to the approval of the Secretary, regulations that: ( 1 ) Establish handling requirements for particular grades, sizes, or qualities, or any combination thereof, of any or all varieties or classifications of walnuts during any period;
( 2 ) Establish different handling requirements and tolerance limits for particular grades, sizes, or qualities, or any combination thereof, for different market destinations;
( 3 ) Establish different handling requirements for the processing of shelled walnuts and the handling thereof; and
( 4 ) Establish inspection and certification requirements for the purposes of this paragraph (a) and paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) During any period, regulations issued under this section are in effect, no handler shall handle or process walnuts into manufactured items or products unless they meet the applicable requirements under this section as evidenced by certification acceptable to the Board.
( c ) Regulations issued under this section may be amended, modified, suspended, or terminated whenever it is determined: ( 1 ) That such action is warranted upon recommendation of the Board and approval by the Secretary, or other available information; or
( 2 ) That regulations issued under this section no longer tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act.
[88 FR 56748, Aug. 21, 2023]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3428 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3428

        To suspend temporarily the duty on certain music boxes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 6, 2006

  Mr. Durbin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To suspend temporarily the duty on certain music boxes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN MUSIC BOXES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.13.47      Music boxes with    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         mechanical                                                         31/2009
                         musical
                         movements,
                         presented in the
                         immediate
                         packaging for
                         shipment to the
                         ultimate
                         purchaser, and
                         each weighing not
                         over 6 kg
                         together with
                         their retail
                         packaging
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         9208.10.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 76494]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31027]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION

Sunshine Act Meeting; Notice

TIME AND DATE:  The Legal Services Corporation Board of Directors' 
Operations & Regulations Committee (``Committee'') will meet 
telephonically on December 15, 2010. The meeting will begin at 11 a.m., 
Eastern Time, and continue until completion of the Committee's agenda.

LOCATION:  Legal Services Corporation, F. William McCalpin Conference 
Center, 3rd Floor, 3333 K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20007.

PUBLIC OBSERVATION:  Unless otherwise noticed, all meetings of the LSC 
Board of Directors are open to public observation. Members of the 
public that are unable to attend but wish to listen to a public 
proceeding may do so by following the telephone call-in directions 
given below. You are asked to keep your telephone muted to eliminate 
background noises. From time to time the presiding Chair may solicit 
comments from the public.

Call-In Directions for Open Sessions

     Call toll-free number: 1-(866) 451-4981;
     When prompted, enter the following numeric pass code: 
5907707348;
     When connected to the call, please ``MUTE'' your telephone 
immediately.

STATUS OF MEETING:  Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

OPEN SESSION

    1. Approval of agenda.
    2. Consider and act on strategic planning.
     Presentation by Mattie Cohan, Senior Assistant General 
Counsel.
    3. Public comment.
    4. Consider and act on other business.
    5. Consider and act on adjournment of meeting.

CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION:  Katherine Ward, Executive Assistant, 
at (202) 295-1500. Questions may be sent by electronic mail to [email protected].

SPECIAL NEEDS:  Upon request, meeting notices will be made available in 
alternate formats to accommodate visual and hearing impairments. 
Individuals who have a disability and need an accommodation to attend 
the meeting may notify Katherine Ward at (202) 295-1500 or [email protected].

    Dated: December 6, 2010.
Patricia D. Batie,
Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-31027 Filed 12-6-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7050-01-P
```
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 5 of 5
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear at 70 FR 30897, May 31, 2005; 77 FR 39904, July 6, 2012; 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

#### § 10.37 Attorney representation.

In the event the individual is represented by an attorney or other representative, the individual shall file with the Director, Office of Administration, a document designating such attorney or representative and authorizing such attorney or representative to receive all correspondence, transcripts, and other documents pertaining to the proceeding under this part.

[47 FR 38676, Sept. 2, 1982, as amended at 52 FR 31610, Aug. 21, 1987; 54 FR 53316, Dec. 28, 1989]
**Exhibit 23.4**

**[Letterhead of Mine Development Associates]**

**CONSENT OF MINE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES**

The undersigned, Mine Development Associates, hereby states as follows: 

Our firm assisted with technical studies (collectively, the “Technical Studies”) concerning mineralized material contained in the Hasbrouck,Three Hills and Wildcat properties (studies completed in 2003 and technical reports issued in 2006), for Vista Gold Corp., portions of which are summarized under the captions “Part I – Item 2. Properties – Advanced ExplorationProperties – Hasbrouck – Geology”; “Part I – Item 2. Properties – Advanced Exploration Properties – Three Hills – Geology” and “Part I – Item 2. Properties – Advanced ExplorationProperties – Wildcat – Geology” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Form 10-K”) for the year ended December 31, 2007 of Allied Nevada Gold Corp. (the “Company”), to be filed with the United StatesSecurities and Exchange Commission. 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No.333-144102) of the Company of the summary information concerning the Technical Studies, including the references to our firm included with such information, as set forth above in the Form 10-K. 

Mine Development Associates 

By:  /s/  Neil Prenn                    

        Name: Neil Prenn 

        Title: President 

Date: March 6, 2008
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

FRANK BLAIR, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

AETNA LIFE INSURANCE 

COMPANY, AMERICOLD 

LOGISTICS, LLC, DAWN 

SANFORD, et al., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CIVIL ACTION NUMBER 

2:06-cv-651 

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, AmeriCold Logistics LLC 

(“AmeriCold”) states: The sole member of AmeriCold Logistics, LLC is 

ART AL LLC, a taxable REIT subsidiary of AmeriCold Realty Trust (a 

Maryland realty trust company). AmeriCold Realty Trust is owned by three 

investors: (1) Vornado Realty Trust (“Vornado”); (2) Crescent Realty Trust 

(“Crescent”); and (3) Yucaipa Companies (“Yucaipa”). Yucaipa is a major 

private equity firm; Vornado and Crescent are publicly traded REITS. All 

three investors own more than 10% of the shares of AmeriCold Realty Trust. 

Case 2:06-cv-00651-MEF-SRW Document 5 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 1 of 3
2

s/James S. Christie, Jr. 

James S. Christie, Jr. (CHR011) 

s/Amelia T. Driscoll 

Amelia T. Driscoll (DRI016) 

One Federal Place 

Bradley Arant Rose & White LLP

1819 Fifth Avenue North 

Birmingham, AL 35203-2104 

Telephone: (205) 521-8000 

Facsimile: (205) 521-8800 

jchristie@bradleyarant.com

adriscoll@bradleyarant.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

AmeriCold Logistics, LLC 

Case 2:06-cv-00651-MEF-SRW Document 5 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 

 I hereby certify that on July 25, 2006, I electronically filed the 

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will 

send notification of such filing to the following: 

 

Ralph Bohanan, Jr. 

Bohanan & Knight, P.C. 

Suite 318 North 

Birmingham, Alabama 35243 

ralphb@bohananknight.com 

and I hereby certify that I have mailed by United States Postal Service on 

this 25th day of July, 2006 the document to the following non-CM/ECF 

participants: 

 None. 

 

s/Amelia T. Driscoll 

Amelia T. Driscoll (DRI016) 

One Federal Place 

Bradley Arant Rose & White LLP

1819 Fifth Avenue North 

Birmingham, AL 35203-2104 

Telephone: (205) 521-8000 

Facsimile: (205) 521-8800 

One of the Attorneys for Defendant 

AmeriCold Logistics, LLC 

1/1474240.1

Case 2:06-cv-00651-MEF-SRW Document 5 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 3 of 3
# Subpart 428.1 - Bonds and Other Financial Protections

**Parent topic:**PART 428 - BONDS AND INSURANCE

## 428.101 Bid guarantees.

## 428.101-1 Policy on use.

The Senior Procurement Executive may authorize class waivers of the requirement to obtain bid guarantees.   

## 428.106 Administration.

## 428.106-6 Furnishing information.

Heads of contracting activities (HCA's) or their designees may furnish certified copies of bonds and the contracts for which they were given as provided by FAR 28.106-6(c). Requesters may be required to pay costs of certification and copying established by the Departmental Fee Schedule for records requests (7 CFR part 1, subpart A, appendix A).
§ 981.39 Duties. The Board shall have, among other things, the following duties: ( a ) To act as intermediary between the Secretary and any handler or grower;
( b ) To keep minute books and records which will clearly reflect all of its acts and transactions, and such minute books and records shall be subject to examination by the Secretary at any time;
( c ) To investigate the growing, shipping, and marketing conditions with respect to almonds and to assemble data in connection therewith;
( d ) To furnish to the Secretary such available information as may be deemed pertinent or as he may request;
( e ) To appoint such employees as it may deem necessary and to determine the salaries, define the duties and fix the bonds of such employees; and
( f ) To cause the books of the Board to be audited by one or more competent certified public accountants at least once for each crop year, and at such other times as the Board may deem necessary or as the Secretary may request; and the report of each such audit shall show, among other things, the receipt and expenditure of funds pursuant hereto: and to file with the Secretary three copies of all audit reports made.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report for the year ended December 31, 2008 on Form 10-K (the
Annual Report), of Hughes Network Systems, LLC (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, we, Pradman P. Kaul and Grant A. Barber, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:



| | (i) | the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                             |  |                                                     
|------------------- |  | --------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 5, 2009 |  | HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC
|                    |  | (Registrant)               
|                    |  |                            
|                    |  |                             |  | /s/ PRADMAN P. KAUL                                 
|                    |  |                            
|                    |  | Name:                       |  | Pradman P. Kaul                                     
|                    |  | Title:                      |  | Chief Executive Officer and President               
|                    |  |                             |  | (Principal Executive Officer)                       
|                    |  |                            
|                    |  |                             |  | /s/ GRANT A. BARBER                                 
|                    |  |                            
|                    |  | Name:                       |  | Grant A. Barber                                     
|                    |  | Title:                      |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                    |  |                             |  | (Principal Financial Officer)                       

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE
RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
Order entered August 30, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00742-CV

AZEB RUDER, Appellant

V.

WILLIAM JORDAN D/B/A WILLIAM DAVIS REALTY, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 004-01346-2014

ORDER

We GRANT the court reporter’s August 28, 2016 motion for an extension of time to file 

the reporter’s record to the extent that we extend the time to MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 

2016. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c).

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
Searched for **http://bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/vpj.pdf**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/vpj.pdf**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.