alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2


CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION





I, Ha
Quang Bui, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this annual  report on Form 10-K of Cavico
Corp.:





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report.





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operation and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report.





4. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and





c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f))that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information: and





b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.





Date:
      April 14, 2009
            
            
            /s/
      Ha Quang BuiHa
      Quang Bui
              Chief
      Financial Officer
EX-4.40



 Exhibit 4.40 

ADDENDUM NO. 2 
 THIS AGREEMENT is
made this 2nd day of April 2017 by and between CAPITAL SHIP MANAGEMENT CORP. of Panama (the “CSM”) and CAPITAL PRODUCT PARTNERS L.P. of Marshall Islands (the
“CPLP”). 
 WHEREAS: 
  

	A.	CPLP, whose units are listed and trade on the Nasdaq Global Select Market, owns vessels and requires certain Information Technology (IT) Services; 


 

	B.	Pursuant to the IT Agreement dated 3rd April 2007, as amended (the “IT Agreement”), CPLP engaged CSM to provide such IT Services to CPLP, on the
terms set out therein; 

  

	C.	The term of the IT Agreement expires on the 2nd day of April 2017 and the patties wish to extend and continue this agreement for an additional five (5) years;


  

	D.	CPLP and CSM agree to extend the IT Agreement for an additional five (5) years and to amend certain provisions of the IT Agreement, as set out herein. 


NOW IT IS HEREBY MUTUALLY AGREED as follows: 
  

	1.	The term of the IT Agreement is renewed for another five (5) years, namely from 3rd April 2017 to 2nd April
2022. 

  

	2.	Section 11 of the IT Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows: 


Notice. Notice under this Agreement shall be given (via hand delivery or facsimile) as follows: 

If to CPLP: 3 Iassonos Street, Piraeus, 18537 Greece, Attn: CEO & CFO, Fax: +30 210 428 4285. 

If to CSM: 3 Iassonos Street, Piraeus, 18537 Greece, Attn: Head of IT Department, Fax: +30 210 428 4285. 

 

	3.	Words defined in the IT Agreement shall have the same meaning when used in this addendum unless the context requires otherwise; 

  

	4.	All other terms and conditions of the said IT Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Parties have executed this Agreement by their duly authorized signatories with
effect on the date first above written. 
 CAPITAL PRODUCT PARTNERS L.P. BY ITS 

GENERAL PARTNER, CAPITAL GP L.L.C., 
  

					
	By:	 	 /s/ Gerasimos Kalogiratos

		 	Name:	 	Gerasimos Kalogiratos
		 	Title:	 	Chief Executive Officer and Chief
		 		 	Financial Officer of Capital GP L.L.C.

 CAPITAL SHIPMANAGEMENT CORP., 
  

					
	By:	 	 /s/ Sarantos Petropouleas

		 	Name:	 	Sarantos Petropouleas
		 	Title:	 	Attorney-in-Fact & Legal Representative
Fourth Department,

May, 1969

(May 8, 1969)

#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. B. C. White, Appellant, v. Vincent R. Mancusi, as Warden of Attica Prison, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Relator’s contention that his counsel agreed but failed to file a notice of appeal from his judgment of conviction may not be reviewed in this habeas corpus proceeding. The forum for such review is the court wherein defendant was convicted, and the procedure is by *coram nobis (People*v. *Callaway,*24 N Y 2d 127; *People*v. *Ramsey,*23 N Y 2d 656). (Appeal from judgment of Wyoming County Court, dismissing writ of habeas corpus.) Present—-Goldman, P. J., Del Vecchio, Witmer, Gabrielli and Bastow, JJ.
§ 927.78 Termination. ( a ) The Secretary may at any time terminate this subpart.
( b ) The Secretary shall terminate or suspend the operation of any or all of the provisions of this subpart whenever he or she finds that such operation obstructs or does not tend to effectuate the declared policy of the act.
( c ) The Secretary shall terminate the provisions of this subpart applicable to fresh pears for market or pears for processing at the end of any fiscal period whenever the Secretary finds, by referendum or otherwise, that such termination is favored by a majority of growers of fresh pears for market or pears for processing, respectively: *Provided*, That such majority has during such period produced more than 50 percent of the volume of fresh pears for market or pears for processing, respectively, in the production area. Such termination shall be effective only if announced on or before the last day of the then current fiscal period.
( d ) The Secretary shall conduct a referendum within every six-year period beginning on May 21, 2005, to ascertain whether continuance of the provisions of this subpart applicable to fresh pears for market or pears for processing are favored by producers of pears for the fresh market and pears for processing, respectively. The Secretary may terminate the provisions of this subpart at the end of any fiscal period in which the Secretary has found that continuance of this subpart is not favored by producers who, during a representative period determined by the Secretary, have been engaged in the production of fresh pears for market or pears for processing in the production area: *Provided*, That termination of the order shall be effective only if announced on or before the last day of the then current fiscal period.
( e ) The provisions of this part shall, in any event, terminate whenever the provisions of the act authorizing them cease to be in effect.
§ 1008.7 Processing of requests. ( a ) Receipt of a request made in accordance with § 1008.6 shall be promptly acknowledged by the Privacy Act Officer.
( b ) Each request shall be acted upon promptly. Every effort will be made to respond within ten working days of the date of receipt by the System Manager or designee. If a response cannot be made within ten working days, the appropriate Privacy Act Officer shall send an interim response providing information on the status of the request, including an estimate of the time within which action is expected to be taken on the request and asking for any further information as may be necessary to respond to the request. Action will be completed as soon as possible, but not later than 20 working days after receipt of the original specific inquiry. In unusual circumstances and for good cause, the appropriate Privacy Act Officer may decide that action cannot be completed within the initial 20 working days. In such case, the appropriate Privacy Act Officer will advise the individual of the reason for the delay and the date (not to exceed an additional 20 working days) by which action can be expected to be completed.
( c ) The term *unusual circumstances* as used in this section includes situations where a search for requested records from inactive storage is necessary; cases where a voluminous amount of data is involved; instances where information on other individuals must be separated or expunged from the particular record; and cases where consultation with other agencies which have substantial interest in the response to the request is necessary.
( d ) Upon receiving a request, the Privacy Act Officer shall ascertain which System Manager or Managers of the DOE have primary responsibility for, custody of, or concern with the system or systems of records subject to the request and shall forward the request to such System Manager or Managers. The System Manager or Managers shall promptly identify and, in consultation with the General Counsel, review the records encompassed by the request.
( e ) Where the request is for access to or information about records, after reviewing the material the System Manager or Managers concerned shall transmit to the Privacy Act Officer the requested material. The transmission to the Privacy Act Officer shall include any recommendation that the request be granted or wholly or partially denied and shall set forth any exemption categories supporting denials. Any denial recommendation must be concurred in by the appropriate General Counsel.
( f ) Where the request is for correction or amendment of records, after reviewing the material the System Manager or Managers shall transmit a recommended decision to the Privacy Act Officer. Any recommendation that the request be granted or wholly or partially denied shall cite the exemption relied on and set forth the policy considerations supporting a denial. Any recommendation of denial must be concurred in by General Counsel.
157 So.2d 235

#### Ervin M. WILSON v. MARQUETTE CASUALTY COMPANY et al.

No. 46997.

Nov. 12, 1963.

In re: Herman LaMothe, Jr., Jefferson Music Company and Marquette Casualty Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 156 So.2d 331.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in the result it reached.
#### In the Matter of Emmanuel O. Onuaguluchi, an Attorney, Appellant. Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, Petitioner.

Submitted July 23, 2007;

decided September 18, 2007

Reported below, 36 AD3d 823.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed as untimely *(see*CPLR 5513 [b]).
Subpart 2906.3 - Other Than Full and Open

Competition

Parent topic: PART 2906 - COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS

2906.301 Policy.

(a) Department of Labor acquisitions must comply with the Department of Labor Manual Series

(DLMS) 2, Chapter 830 (available by mail from the Director, Division of Acquisition Management

Services, 200 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20210-0001), or electronically from

http://www.dol.gov/oasam/programs/boc/prb.htm. Any proposed noncompetitive acquisition in

excess of the simplified acquisition threshold must be fully justified and, if required by the DLMS,

submitted to the DOL Procurement Review Board and approved by the Assistant Secretary for

Administration and Management and, in the case of research and development contracts, also by the

Assistant Secretary for Policy.

(b) With the exception of contracts for advisory and assistance services or for research and

development, the contracting officer has the authority below the simplified acquisition threshold to

approve sole source contracts. The contracting officer is responsible for assuring that proposed

acquisitions below the simplified acquisition threshold are in compliance with FAR and DOLAR

requirements regarding competition.

2906.303 Justifications.

The authority of the agency head to determine that only specified make and models of technical

equipment will satisfy the agency's need under FAR 6.302-1 is delegated to the HCA.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

JOHN STEPHEN COLEMAN,

AIS# 223809,

Petitioner,

VS.

GWENDOLYN MOSLEY,

et al,

Respondents.

)

)

)

)

)

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

) 2:06-CV-669-MEF

)

)

)

)

)

CONFLICT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Come now Troy King and Gwendolyn Mosley, by and through Counsel

named below, and make the following disclosure regarding potential conflicts of

interest relating to those designated in this Court's General Order No. 3047:

Troy King and Gwendolyn Mosley, parties named to the above-captioned case as

required under 28 U.S.C. § 2242 and Rules 2(a) and (b) of the Rules Governing

Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254, have been sued in their official

capacities. Gwendolyn Mosley is not currently the Warden of Easterling

Correctional Facility where Coleman is incarcerated. Neither the Alabama

Attorney General nor Louis Boyd, the current Warden of Easterling

Case 2:06-cv-00669-MEF-SRW Document 15 Filed 02/11/2008 Page 1 of 3
Correctional Facility possess any known affiliations that would create a

"professional or financial conflict for a judge" on this Court.

JohnJ4. Porter

Counsel for Troy King and Louis Boyd

2

Case 2:06-cv-00669-MEF-SRW Document 15 Filed 02/11/2008 Page 2 of 3
-

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 11th day of February, 2008, I have filed the

foregoing with the Clerk of this Court and the same on Petitioner at:

John Stephen Coleman

AIS# 223809 - E2-Gl-B

Easterling Correctional Facility

200 Wallace Drive

Clio, Alabama 36017

cO

Johi(Jt4. Porter (P0R023)

Assistant Attorney General

Office of the Attorney General

Alabama State House

11 South Union

Montgomery, AL 36130-0152

Telephone: (334) 242-7300

Fax: (334) 242-2848

E-Mail: jporter(ago. state,aLus

3

Case 2:06-cv-00669-MEF-SRW Document 15 Filed 02/11/2008 Page 3 of 3
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3379 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3379

     To suspend temporarily the duty on formulations of NOA 446510.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 6, 2006

  Mr. Vitter introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the duty on formulations of NOA 446510.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FORMULATIONS OF NOA 446510.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.11.05       Formulations of    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         NOA 446510 which                                                   31/2009
                         include NOA
                         446510 Technical,
                         2-(4-chloro-
                         phenyl)-N-[2-(3-
                         methoxy-4-prop-2-
                         ynyloxy-
                         phenyl)ethyl]-2-
                         prop-2-
                         ynyloxyacetamide
                         (CAS No. 374726-
                         62-2) (provided
                         for in subheading
                         3808.20.15)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
****NCEP/Climate Prediction Center ATLAS No. 8****
**Relationships Between El Nino-Southern Oscillationand the Arctic Oscillation: A Climate-Weather Link**
****Table of Contents****
Abstract

1.  Introduction
2.  Methodology
       
   
Table1.  CPC classification of ENSO phase by season
3.  The ENSO only composites
           
Table2. Number of Seasons in ENSO composites
           
Table3.  ENSO composite figures
4.  The AO only composites
Table 4.  Number of days in AO composites
Table 5.  AO composite figures

5.  The AO-ENSO link
Table 6.  Number of days of in AO/ENSO Composites
Table 7.  Average Duration
Table 8.  AO/ENSO composite figures

-  6.  Significancetest for temp and precipitation composites
-              Table9. Significance tests for temperature composites
-            Table10. Significance tests for precipitation composites

 
Acknowledgments
**References**back to the first page
5124.203 Policy.    (a) Contracting officers must follow instructions in Army Regulation (AR) 25-55 for the denial of, or release of, acquisition information.       (b)(i) The Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology) has delegated the initial denial authority to act on requests for procurement records under the Freedom of Information Act, except those procurement records under the purview of the Chief of Engineers and the Commander, Army Materiel Command, to the heads of the contracting activities (HCAs). The HCAs may further delegate this authority only to the senior contracting official (SCO).       (ii) If the contracting officer concludes that he/she should deny some or all information requested, he/she must prepare the proposed response for the HCA in accordance with AR 25-55. The response must include appeal language substantially the same as the following:       “You may appeal, in whole or in part, this denial to the Secretary of the Army (attn: General Counsel). In the event you decide to appeal, your letter of appeal must be postmarked no later than 60 calendar days after the date of this denial letter. Please address your appeal to (*HCA address*). This denial is made on behalf of the Initial Denial Authority, (*name*          *and title*), by (*name and rank*), Head of the Contracting Activity (*office*).” (*Substitute*          *SCO*          *for*          *HCA*          *if the*          *SCO*          *is the HCA’s designee*          *.*)       (iii) Contracting officers in contracting activities other than the Army Materiel Command and the United States Army Corps of Engineers must send the proposed denial response to the HCA or, if delegated, to the SCO. Include copies of the records recommended for denial with a justification for the denial. Contracting officers in the Army Materiel Command and the United States Army Corps of Engineers must follow the procedures specified by their headquarters.       (iv) After coordination with counsel, the HCA will provide the denial response, modified if necessary, to the requestor.       (v) Within three working days of receipt of appeals, HCAs must send notice, the appeal and the documents required by AR 25-55 to the Office of the General Counsel at the following address:              ATTN: SAGC       General Counsel       104 Army Pentagon       Washington, DC 20310-0104. **Parent topic:** Subpart 5124.2 - Freedom of Information Act
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3504 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3504

To amend the Public Health Service Act to prohibit the solicitation or 
 acceptance of tissue from fetuses gestated for research purposes, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 13, 2006

 Mr. Santorum (for himself and Mr. Brownback) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Public Health Service Act to prohibit the solicitation or 
 acceptance of tissue from fetuses gestated for research purposes, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fetus Farming Prohibition Act of 
2006''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF THE SOLICITATION OR ACCEPTANCE OF TISSUE FROM 
              FETUSES GESTATED FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES.

    Section 498B of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 289g-2) is 
amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsections (c) and (d) as subsections 
        (d) and (e), respectively;
            (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following:
    ``(c) Solicitation or Acceptance of Tissue From Fetuses Gestated 
for Research Purposes.--It shall be unlawful for any person or entity 
involved or engaged in interstate commerce to--
            ``(1) solicit or knowingly acquire, receive, or accept a 
        donation of human fetal tissue knowing that a human pregnancy 
        was deliberately initiated to provide such tissue; or
            ``(2) knowingly acquire, receive, or accept tissue or cells 
        obtained from a human embryo or fetus that was gestated in the 
        uterus of a nonhuman animal.'';
            (3) in paragraph (1) of subsection (d), as so re-
        designated, by striking ``(a) or (b)'' and inserting ``(a), 
        (b), or (c)''; and
            (4) in paragraph (1) of subsection (e), as so redesignated, 
        by striking ``section 498A(f)'' and inserting ``section 
        498A(g)''.
                                 <all>
```