alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from National
Property Investors 8 1997 Second Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000763701
<NAME> NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS 8
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,954
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       34
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          29,718
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,491
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  19,198
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         10,954
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,584
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    19,198
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,319
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,338
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 510
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (19)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (19)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (19)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.42)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
§ 987.83 Effect of termination or amendment. Unless otherwise expressly provided by the Secretary, the termination hereof or of any regulation issued pursuant to this part, or the issuance of any amendment to either thereof, shall not— ( a ) Affect or waive any right, duty, obligation, or liability which shall have arisen or which may thereafter arise in connection with any provision of this part or any regulation issued hereunder, or
( b ) Release or extinguish any violation of this part or of any regulation issued hereunder, or
( c ) Affect or impair any rights or remedies of the Secretary or of any other person, with respect to any such violation.
1480.904 Challenge not timely.       If a CO receives an untimely filed challenge of a representation, the CO must notify the challenger that the challenge cannot be considered on the instant acquisition but will be considered in any future actions. However, the CO may question at any time, before or after award, the representation of an IEE.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1480.9 - Challenges to Representation
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 335 

To reauthorize the Congressional Award Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2005 

Mr. LIEBERMAN (for himself, Ms. COLLINS, and Mr. CRAIG) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Congressional Award Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE CONGRESSIONAL 

4 AWARD ACT. 

5 (a) EXTENSION OF REQUIREMENTS REGARDING FI6 NANCIAL OPERATIONS OF CONGRESSIONAL AWARD PRO7 GRAM; NONCOMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS.—Section 

8 104(c)(2)(A) of the Congressional Award Act (2 U.S.C. 

9 804(c)(2)(A)) is amended by striking ‘‘and 2004’’ and in10 serting ‘‘2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009’’. 

11 (b) TERMINATION.— 
2 

•S 335 IS

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 108 of the Congres2 sional Award Act (2 U.S.C. 808) is amended by 

3 striking ‘‘October 1, 2004’’ and inserting ‘‘October 

4 1, 2009’’. 

5 (2) SAVINGS PROVISION.—During the period of 

6 October 1, 2004, through the date of the enactment 

7 of this section, all actions and functions of the Con8 gressional Award Board under the Congressional 

9 Award Act (2 U.S.C. 801 et seq.) shall have the 

10 same effect as though no lapse or termination of the 

11 Board ever occurred. 

12 (c) TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.—The Congressional 

13 Award Act is amended— 

14 (1) in section 103 (2 U.S.C. 803)— 

15 (A) in subsection (a)(1) (B) and (C), by 

16 striking ‘‘a a local’’ and inserting ‘‘a local’’; and 

17 (B) in subsection (b)(3)(B), by striking 

18 ‘‘section’’ each place it appears and inserting 

19 ‘‘subsection’’; and 

20 (2) in section 104(c)(2)(A) (2 U.S.C. 

21 804(c)(2)(A)), by inserting a comma after ‘‘1993’’. 

Æ
§ 905.161 Repacking shipper. ( a ) A repacking shipper is a person who repacks and ships citrus fruit grown in the production area in Florida which has been previously inspected and certified as meeting the requirements specified under § 905.52 of the order, and who has obtained a currently valid repacking certificate of privilege issued to him or her by the committee as specified in § 905.162.
( b ) Each repacking shipper, to qualify for a repacking certificate of privilege, must notify the committee 10 days prior to his or her first shipment of repacked citrus fruit during a particular fiscal period of his or her intent to ship such citrus fruit, submit an Application for a Repacking Certificate of Privilege form supplied by the committee, and agree to other requirements as set forth in §§ 905.162 and 905.163 inclusive, with respect to such shipments. The repacking shipper shall certify that he or she will only handle previously inspected and certified citrus fruit.
( c ) Any repacking shipper who handles citrus fruit shipped under a repacking certificate of privilege must, other order provisions notwithstanding, meet the following requirements: ( 1 ) All such citrus fruit must be positive lot identified by the Federal or Federal/State Inspection Service and certified as meeting the applicable requirements for citrus fruit shipped to the domestic market (fruit shipped from the production area to any point outside thereof in the 48 contiguous States and the District of Columbia of the United States), prior to being repacked and shipped by the repacking shipper. Each such citrus fruit shipment shall be accompanied by a Federal-State manifest that certifies the grade and amount of each load of citrus fruit received, which shall be retained by the repacking shipper.
( 2 ) Be reported as required in § 905.163.
( 3 ) The repacking facility used to repack previously inspected and certified citrus fruit by the repacking shipper shall not have operable equipment to wash, brush, wax, or dry citrus fruit.
( 4 ) All citrus fruit handled by a repacking shipper shall be packed in approved Florida Department of Citrus fruit containers.
( 5 ) Each container shipped with such citrus fruit shall be marked with the repacking shipper's repacking certificate of privilege number.
[59 FR 48782, Sept. 23, 1994, as amended at 88 FR 82232, Nov. 24, 2023]
# Subpart 1370.1 - Provisions and Clauses

**Parent topic:**PART 1370 - UNIVERSAL SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES

## 1370.101 Period of performance.

Insert the clause 1352.270-70, *Period of Performance,* in all solicitations and contracts where a period of performance will be specified.   

## 1370.102 Pre-bid/pre-proposal conference and site visit.

Insert provision 1352.270-71, *Pre-Bid/Pre-Proposal Conference and Site Visit,* in solicitations where a pre-proposal conference will be held. The provision is optional for construction and may be modified as necessary. The contracting officer shall include or delete the paragraph regarding site visits.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3348 

To suspend temporarily the duty on ester gums. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 26, 2006 

Mr. SPECTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on ester gums. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ESTER GUMS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.38.08 Ester gums (CAS No. 68475–37–6) 

(provided for in subheading 3806.30.00) Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•S 3348 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
Exhibit 10.70


 


Loan Agreement


 


The Loan Agreement (the “Agreement”) is entered
into as of January 15th, 2018 between the following two parties:


 


(1) ZLI Holdings Limited (the “Lender”)


 


(2) Law Anhou Insurance Agency Co., Ltd.
(the “Borrower”)


 


The Lender and the Borrower will each be
referred to as a “Party” and collectively referred to as the “Parties.”


 


WHEREAS, the Borrower wishes to borrow a
loan from the Lender for its operations and the Lender agrees to provide such loan to the Borrower for such specified purpose.


 


NOW THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows:


 


		1.	The
Lender agrees to provide the loan at amount USD 595,000 (the “Loan”) to the Borrower and agrees to proceed such Loan
to the Borrower within 30 days of the effective date of this Agreement.


 


		2.	Term
for the Loan shall be from January 15th, 2018 to January 14th, 2021(the “Term”) which may be
extended successive 1 year in the event the Lender does not ask the Borrower to repay the principal amount of the Loan at the
end of Term.


 


		3.	The
principal amount of the Loan shall be paid in one lump sum or in installments before the Term.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have duly executed
this Agreement, or have caused this Agreement to be duly executed on their behalf, as of the date first hereinabove set forth.


 


Lender: ZLI Holdings Limited (seal)


Borrower: Law Anhou Insurance Agency Co., Ltd. (seal)


Date: January 15th, 2018
1532.003 Simplified acquisition procedures

financing.

(a) Scope. This subpart provides for authorization of advance and interim payments on commercial

item orders not exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold. Advance payments are payments that

are made prior to performance. Interim payments are payments that are made during the order

period according to a payment schedule.

(b) Procedures for micropurchases. Contracting officers may authorize advance and interim

payments on orders for commercial items only at or below the micropurchase threshold.

(c) Procedures for purchases exceeding micropurchase threshold. Contracting officers must secure

approval at one level above the contracting officer, on a case-by-case basis, for advance and interim

payments on orders for commercial items exceeding the micropurchase threshold and not exceeding

the simplified acquisition threshold. The contracting officer shall submit a recommendation for

approval of financing terms, along with the supporting rationale for the action, to one level above

the contracting officer. Remote simplified acquisition contracting officers (SACO) without one level

above contracting officers at their locations shall forward recommendations through their OAM

Advisors to secure one level above approval.

(d) Supporting rationale. Regardless of dollar value, the contracting officer shall document the file

with supporting rationale demonstrating that the purchase meets the conditions of FAR

32.202-1(b)(1), (3) and (4).

(e) Administration. Regardless of dollar value, the contracting officer is responsible for ensuring that

supplies or services have been delivered. The contracting officer shall document the file with

evidence of receipt of supplies or services throughout the order period as appropriate to the

acquisition.

(f) Clause. The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 1552.232-74, Payments - Simplified

Acquisition Procedures Financing, in solicitations and orders that will provide simplified acquisition

procedures financing.

Parent topic: PART 1532 - CONTRACT FINANCING
52.247-40 Ex Dock, Pier, or Warehouse, Port of Importation.       As prescribed in 47.303-12(c), insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts when the delivery term is ex dock, pier, or warehouse, port of importation:          Ex Dock, Pier, or Warehouse, Port of Importation (Apr 1984)                                       (a) 						            The term "ex dock, pier, or warehouse, port of importation," as used in this clause, means free of expense to the Government delivered on the designated dock or pier or in the warehouse at the specified port of importation.                                          (b) 						            The Contractor shall-                                                         (1)                                                                           (i) 										                    Pack and mark the shipment to comply with contract specifications; or                                                                              (ii) 										                    In the absence of specifications, prepare the shipment for ocean transportation in conformance with carrier requirements to protect the goods;                                                                                                           (2)                                                                           (i) 										                    Deliver shipment in good order and condition; and                                                                              (ii) 										                    Pay and bear all charges up to the point of delivery specified in the contract, including transportation costs; export, import, or other fees or taxes; costs of wharfage and landing, if any; customs duties; and costs of certificates of origin, consular invoices, or other documents that may be required for exportation or importation; and                                                                                                           (3) 								                Be responsible for any loss of and/or damage to the goods occurring before delivery of the shipment to the point of delivery specified in the contract.                                                                    (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.247 [Reserved]
1324.203 Policy.

DOC's implementation of the Freedom of Information Act is described in 15 CFR part 4 and DAO

205-14.

Parent topic: Subpart 1324.2 - Freedom of Information Act
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3164 

To amend the Trade Act of 1974 to extend trade benefits to certain tents 

imported into the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. BOND introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Trade Act of 1974 to extend trade benefits 

to certain tents imported into the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DUTY-FREE TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN TENTS. 

4 (a) ARTICLES NOT DESIGNATED AS SENSITIVE.— 

5 Section 503(b) (19 U.S.C. 2463(b)) of the Trade Act of 

6 1974 is amended— 

7 (1) in paragraph (1)(A), by inserting ‘‘and, 

8 with respect to countries designated under section 

9 503(a)(1)(B), paragraph (5),’’ after ‘‘paragraph 

10 (4)’’; and 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 3164 IS 

1 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

2 paragraph: 

3 ‘‘(5) CERTAIN TENTS.—Notwithstanding para4 graph (1)(A), the President may designate as an eli5 gible article or articles under subsection (a) certain 

6 tents with a sewn in floor and base size less than 

7 6.096 meters by 6.096 meters classifiable under sub8 heading 6306.22.90 of the Harmonized Tariff 

9 Schedule of the United States.’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

11 subsection (a) shall apply to any article entered, or with12 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 

13 date on which the President makes a designation with re14 spect to the article under section 503(b)(5) of the Trade 

15 Act of 1974, as added by subsection (a). 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
September 10, 2013

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting of U.S. EPA, Region 8 and State Ai r Directors representing all Region 8 states

(Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Uta h and Wyoming)

TO: EPA Docket # EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0322

This memorandum documents a meeting held on Septemb er 10, 2013, between all Region 8 State Air Directors and the U.S. Environmental Protection Age ncy, Region 8.

One of the agenda items for the meeting was the EPA ’s upcoming final rulemaking related to startup, shutdown and malfunction (SSM) provisions contained in various state implementation plans (SIPs). During the discussion related to this forthcoming r ulemaking, EPA indicated that we were in discussion s with the litigants (Sierra Club) to extend the curr ent settlement agreement date for signature of the final, but that a potential extension was as yet undetermi ned. EPA also stated that the expected deadline for states subject to the final SIP Call to submit SIPs to remedy the determined deficiencies was 18 month s, as indicated in the February 22, 2013 proposed rule making. See 78 FR 12460. EPA also informed the states in attendance that their timely comments on the proposed rulemaking would be addressed in the

final rule.

No other matters related to the SSM SIP Call were d iscussed during the meeting.

The following State Air Directors were present:

Brian Gustafson – South Dakota; Bryce Bird – Utah; Dave Klemp – Montana; Steven Dietrich - Wyoming; Terry O’Clair – North Dakota; Will Allison – Colorado

The following EPA Region 8 staff was present:

Adam Clark; Carl Daly; Monica Morales and Scott Jac kson.
(85 Misc. Rep. 579)

#### FARLEY v. MEHLSACK.

(Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.

May, 1914.)

Intoxicating Liquors (§ 108*)—License — Proceedings to Revoke — Time to Institute.

Under the express provisions of the Liquor Tax Law (Consol. Laws, c. 34) § 27, subd. 2, a proceeding to revoke and cancel a liquor tax certificate may be instituted after the expiration of the excise year.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Intoxicating Liquors, Cent. Dig. §§ 116-118; Dec. Dig. § 108.*]

Proceedings by William W. Farley against Fanny Mehlsack, to revoke a liquor tax certificate. Judgment for plaintiff.

A. M. Sperry, for plaintiff.

Ashbel P. Fitch and Mott & Grant, all of New York City, for defendant.

*

For other cases see same topic & § number in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, *&*Rep’r Indexes

COHALAN, J.

This is a proceeding to revoke liquor tax certificate No. 4638, issued to the respondent, Fanny Mehlsack, on the 28th day of September, 1912. The revocation is sought on the ground that the respondent unlawfully permitted her premises to become disorderly on the 26th and 27th days of September, 1913. These dates were *1074prior to the expiration of the liquor tax certificate, and the proceedings were not instituted until the excise year for which the certificate had been issued had actually expired. The commissioner of excise asserts that a proceeding to revoke and cancel a liquor tax certificate may be instituted after the expiration of the excise year, and the statute itself is authority therefor. Liquor Tax Law, § 27, subd. 2. This has been held to be a wise provision when it is considered that the penalty imposed upon the premises for permitting a disorderly condition thereof is of such a public interest that it is superior to the prior privilege of conducting the premises for the purpose of liquor traffic. The public has the right to an absolute suspension of traffic in the premises for one year. This contention has been sustained by Mr. Justice Mills, of the ninth department, in the unreported case of Farley v. Hammer and by Mr. Justice De Angelis in the case of Farley v. Wurz, Oneida, Special Term, October 4, 1913. In that case the court held:

> “It would seem to follow from the foregoing that the special proceeding, instituted for the purpose of establishing the fact that a person, while the holder of a liquor tax certificate, permitted the certificated premises to become disorderly, should be instituted against him, although, even before the institution of the proceeding, the term of such certificate should have expired.”

Judgment for cancellation granted. Decision and judgment may be submitted on notice.

Motion granted.
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 17 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 17 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-40589

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RAUL ELIAS RANGEL-REYES, also known as Jose Angel De Leon-Alcala,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:13-CR-126-1

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Raul Elias RangelReyes (Rangel) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rangel has not filed a response. We 

have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 21, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-40589 Document: 00512540122 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2014
No. 13-40589

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 13-40589 Document: 00512540122 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/21/2014
#### § 955.45 Contributions.

The committee may accept voluntary contributions but these shall only be used to pay expenses incurred pursuant to § 955.50. Such contributions shall be free from any encumbrances by the donor, and the committee shall retain complete control of their use.