alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 140 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         March 9, 2005.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 3) to authorize funds for Federal-aid highways, highway safety 
programs, and transit programs, and for other purposes. The first reading of the 
bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the 
bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not 
exceed two hours and 20 minutes, with two hours and 10 minutes equally divided 
and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure, including a final period of 10 minutes 
following consideration of the bill for amendment, and 10 minutes equally 
divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on Ways and Means. The amendment in the nature of a substitute 
recommended by the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure now printed in 
the bill, modified by the amendment printed in part A of the report of the 
Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, shall be considered as adopted 
in the House and in the Committee of the Whole. The bill, as amended, shall be 
considered as the original bill for the purpose of further amendment under the 
five-minute rule and shall be considered as read. All points of order against 
provisions in the bill, as amended, are waived. No further amendment shall be in 
order except those printed in part B of the report of the Committee on Rules or 
except pursuant to a subsequent order of the House. Each amendment in part B may 
be offered only in the order printed in the report, may be offered only by a 
Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable 
for the time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by the 
proponent and an opponent, and shall not be subject to amendment or demand for 
division of the question in the House or in the Committee of the Whole. All 
points of order against amendments in part B are waived. After disposition of 
the amendments in part B, the Committee shall rise without motion. No further 
consideration of the bill shall be in order except pursuant to a subsequent 
order of the House.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o
. 0 9

- 3 1 0 5 3 S u m m a r y C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v
. F E L I P E M E D R A N O

- V I C T O R I A , D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e W e s t e r n D i s t r i c t o f L o u i s i a n a U S D C N o
. 2 : 0 9

- C R

- 2 3

- 1

B e f o r e K I N G , J O L L Y , a n d B E N A V I D E S , C i r c u i t J u d g e s
. P E R C U R I A M : * T h e F e d e r a l P u b l i c D e f e n d e r a p p o i n t e d t o r e p r e s e n t F e l i p e M e d r a n o V i c t o r i a h a s m o v e d f

o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w a n d h a s f i l e d a b r i e f i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h A n d e r s v
. C a l i f

o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. M e d r a n o - V i c t o r i a h a s n o t f i l e d a

r e s p o n s e
. O u r i n d e p e n d e n t r e v i e w o f t h e r e c o r d a n d c o u n s e l ’ s b r i e f d i s c l o s e s n o

n o n f r i v o l o u s i s s u e f

o r a p p e a l

. A c c o r d i n g l y , c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n f o r l e a v e t o

w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n ,
a n d t h e A P P E A L I S D I S M I S S E D

. S e e 5 T H C I R

. R

. 4 2

. 2

. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D July 22, 2 010 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R
. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 09-31053 Document: 00511182371 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/22/2010
###### Editorial Note on Part 1045

#### Editorial Notes:Nomenclature changes to part 1045 appear at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023, and 88 FR 82238, Nov. 24, 2023.

§ 1045.15 What is the process for submitting a question or a comment on any of the policies and procedures contained in this part?

Editorial Notes:

Nomenclature changes to part 1045 appear at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023, and 88 FR 82238, Nov. 24, 2023.

Any person who has a question or a comment on DOE's classification and declassification policies and procedures under this part may submit the question or comment in writing to the Director, Office of Classification, EHSS-60/Germantown Building, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20585. The correspondence should contain the question or comment, include applicable background information and/or citations, as appropriate, and must provide an address for the response. The Director will make every effort to respond within 60 days. Under no circumstance will anyone be subject to retribution for asking a question or making a comment regarding DOE's classification and declassification policies and procedures.

[83 FR 66007, Dec. 21, 2018, as amended at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023]
Case 3:06-cv-00722-WKW-TFM Document 10 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00722-WKW-TFM Document 10 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00722-WKW-TFM Document 10 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 3 of 3
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3178 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3178

    To suspend temporarily the duty on certain compounds of yttrium 
                    europium oxide co-precipitates.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

  Mr. Bunning introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on certain compounds of yttrium 
                    europium oxide co-precipitates.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN COMPOUNDS OF YTTRIUM EUROPIUM OXIDE CO-PRECIPITATES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.10.04        Compounds, inorganic    Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           or organic, of rare-                                              31/2009          ''
                           earth metals, of                                                                    .
                           yttrium europium
                           oxide co-precipitates
                           having a purity of at
                           least 90% yttrium
                           (provided for in
                           subheadings
                           2846.10.00 and
                           2846.90.80)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### DUCKWORTH, Appellant, v. SHIMKO, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 8, 1906.)

Action by Walter F. Duckworth against Michaliao Shimko,

PER CURIAM.

Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed, and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event; on the ground that if the plaintiff was entitled to recover, he was entitled to a commission of 21/s per cent., as agreed to by the borrower.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 239 (Tuesday, December 14, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 77958]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31299]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

[OMB Control No. 2900-0546]


Gravesite Reservation Survey (2 Year); Correction

AGENCY: National Cemetery Administration, Department of Veterans 
Affairs.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) published a collection 
of information notice in the Federal Register on December 7, 2010, that 
contained errors. The notice incorrectly identified the responsible VA 
organization. This document corrects that error by removing in two 
places ``Veterans Benefits Administration'' and adding, in each place, 
``National Cemetery Administration''.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Denise McLamb, Enterprise Records 
Service (005R1B), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, 
NW., Washington, DC 20420, at 202-461-7485.

Correction

    In FR Doc. 2010-30554, published on December 7, 2010, at 75 FR 
76082, make the following correction. On page 76082, in the first 
column, at the Agency heading and in the Summary, remove in both places 
``Veterans Benefits Administration'' and add, in each place, ``National 
Cemetery Administration''.

    Dated: December 8, 2010.
Gloria P. Armstrong,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Veterans Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2010-31299 Filed 12-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
#### § 110.91 Commission consultations.

The Commission may consult at any time on a license application with the staff, the Executive Branch or other persons.

[49 FR 47203, Dec. 3, 1984]
# Subpart 1306.2 - Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources

**Parent topic:**PART 1306 - COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS

## 1306.202 Establishing or maintaining alternative sources.

The authority to exclude a source from a contract action in order to establish or maintain an alternate source is set forth in CAM 1301.70
2909.506 Procedures.       (a) If a prospective contractor disagrees with the decision of a contracting officer regarding an organizational conflict of interest and requests higher level review as referred to in FAR 9.506, the matter must be referred to the Office of the Solicitor, Associate Solicitor for Legislation and Legal Counsel, and the Director, Division of Acquisition Management Services.          (b) Referrals must be made by the HCA concerned and include the contracting officer's decision and the position of the prospective contractor.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2909.5 - Organizational and Consultant Conflicts of Interest
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

LINDA WILLIAMS SHELTON, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-719-WKW

)

ALL STATE FREIGHTWAYS, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

The court has been notified that the parties have settled this case. All remaining dates and

deadlines, including the pretrial and trial date are CANCELLED. The parties are ORDERED to file

a joint stipulation of dismissal on or before December 3, 2007.

DONE this 20th day of November, 2007.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00719-WKW-WC Document 22 Filed 11/20/2007 Page 1 of 1
Conversation of PMN Substances Sanitized
ALD-166 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 15-1547

___________

IN RE: LEON GREEN,

Petitioner

____________________________________

On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the

United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania

(Related to M.D. Pa. Cr. No. 1-13-cr-00210-006)

____________________________________

Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

April 16, 2015

Before: RENDELL, CHAGARES and SCIRICA, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: May 5, 2015)

_________

OPINION*

_________

PER CURIAM

Petitioner, Leon Green, filed a petition for a writ of mandamus on March 9, 2015, 

asking us to order the District Court to remove his counsel of record and to dismiss the 

criminal charges against him. Green contends that the District Court lacks jurisdiction 

over him because he is a free Moorish American national and a member of the free 

Moorish American Nation. 

 

* This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not 

constitute binding precedent.
2

“Mandamus provides a drastic remedy that a court should grant only in 

extraordinary circumstances in response to an act amounting to a judicial usurpation of 

power.” In re Diet Drugs Prods. Liab. Litig., 418 F.3d 372, 378 (3d Cir. 2005)(quotation 

omitted). To demonstrate that mandamus is appropriate, a petitioner must establish that

he has a “clear and indisputable” right to the issuance of the writ and that he has “no 

other adequate means to obtain the desired relief.” Madden v. Myers, 102 F.3d 74, 79 

(3d Cir. 1996)(superseded in part on other grounds by 3d Cir. L.A.R. 24.1(c)). 

Green has not provided competent authority supporting his arguments. In 

addition, Green cannot show that he has no adequate means to obtain the desired relief. 

Green brought a motion to dismiss in the District Court based on the same arguments 

raised in his petition for a writ of mandamus. The District Court considered his 

arguments and denied that motion. Green also filed a pro se motion to have his counsel 

removed, which was denied. All of these issues are being addressed in the District Court 

and may be raised on appeal. Green may not use a mandamus petition as a substitute for 

the appeals process. See In re Briscoe, 448 F.3d 201, 212 (3d Cir. 2006).
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 2:06-cr-206-MHT

)

ALETHIA ADRIANNE SCOTT ) 

GOVERNMENT'S MOTION FOR DETENTION HEARING

The United States, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3142(e) and (f), moves for a detention hearing for

the above-captioned defendant:

1. Eligibility of Cases

This case is eligible for a detention order because this case involves:

Crime of violence (18 U.S.C. § 3156)

Maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death

10 + year drug offense

Felony, with two prior convictions in the above categories

X Serious risk the defendant will flee

Serious risk of obstruction of justice

Felony involving a minor victim

Felony involving possession or use of a firearm or other destructive device

(as defined by 18 U.S.C. § 921) or any other dangerous weapon

Failure to register a sex offender (18 U.S.C. § 2250)

2. Reason For Detention

The Court should detain defendant because there are no conditions of release which will

reasonably assure:

X Defendant's appearance as required

Case 2:06-cr-00206-MHT-CSC Document 6 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 1 of 3
-2-

 X Safety of any other person and the community

3. Rebuttable Presumption

The United States will invoke the rebuttable presumption against defendant under Section

3142(e).

Probable cause to believe defendant committed 10 + year drug offense or an

offense in which a firearm was used or carried under Section 924(c)

 Previous conviction for "eligible" offense committed while on pretrial bond

A period of five years has not elapsed from defendant's conviction or release

from imprisonment for the offense described above

4. Time For Detention Hearing

The United States requests the Court conduct the detention hearing:

At the initial appearance

X After continuance of 3 days 

The Government requests leave of Court to file a supplemental motion with additional

grounds or presumption for detention should this be necessary.

Respectfully submitted this the 18th day of August, 2006.

LEURA G. CANARY 

United States Attorney

/s/ Christopher A. Snyder

CHRISTOPHER A. SNYDER

Assistant United States Attorney

Post Office Box 197

Montgomery, Alabama 36101-0197

334.223.7280

334.223.7135 fax

christopher.a.snyder@usdoj.gov

Case 2:06-cr-00206-MHT-CSC Document 6 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 2 of 3
-3-

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 2:06-cr-206-MHT

)

ALETHIA ADRIANNE SCOTT ) 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 18, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with the

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the

following: Public Defender’s Office.

Respectfully submitted,

 LEURA G. CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/ Christopher A. Snyder 

CHRISTOPHER A. SNYDER

Assistant United States Attorney

Post Office Box 197

Montgomery, Alabama 36101-0197

334.223.7280

334.223.7135 fax

christopher.a.snyder@usdoj.gov

Case 2:06-cr-00206-MHT-CSC Document 6 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 3 of 3
Editorial Note on Part 1046
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1046 appear at 88 FR 41295, June 26, 2023.

§ 1046.19 Medical and fitness for duty status reporting requirements. ( a ) SPOs and SOs must report immediately to their supervisor that they have a known or suspected change in health status that might impair their capacity for duty. To protect their medical confidentiality, they are required only to identify that they need to see the Designated Physician. SOs and SPOs must provide to the Designated Physician detailed information on any known or suspected change in health status that might impair their capacity for duty or the safe and effective performance of assigned duties.
( b ) SPOs and SOs must report to their supervisor and the Designated Physician for a determination of fitness for duty when prescription medication is started or a dosage is changed, to ensure that such medication or change in dosage does not alter the individual's ability to perform any of the essential functions of the job. SPOs and SOs must report to their supervisor and the Designated Physician for a determination of fitness for duty within 24 hours, and prior to assuming duty, after any medication capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior is started, to ensure that such medication does not alter the individual's ability to perform any of the essential functions of the job. Where a written reasonable accommodation determination already has been made, any additional change to an SO's or SPO's health status affecting that accommodation must be reported to their supervisor and the Designated Physician for a determination of fitness for duty.
( c ) Supervisory personnel must document and report to the Designated Physician any observed physical, behavioral, or health changes or deterioration in work performance in SPOs and SOs under their supervision.
( d ) ( 1 ) PF contractor management must inform the Designated Physician of all anticipated job transfers or recategorizations including: ( i ) From SO to FPRS, BRS, ARS, or SRT Member;
( ii ) From FPRS, to BRS, ARS or SRT Member;
( iii ) From BRS to ARS or SRT Member;
( iv ) From ARS to SRT Member;
( v ) From SRT Member to ARS, BRS, FPRS or SO;
( vi ) From ARS to BRS, FPRS, or SO;
( vii ) From BRS to FPRS or SO;
( viii ) From FPRS to SO; and
( ix ) From PF to other assignments.
( 2 ) For downward re-categorizations in paragraphs (d)(1)(v) through (ix) of this section, the anticipated transfer notification must include appropriate additional information such as the apparent inability of the employee to perform essential functions, meet physical readiness standards, or to serve without posing a direct threat to self or others.
( e ) The Designated Physician must notify the PPMD to ensure appropriate medical review can be made regarding any recommended or required changes to the PF member's status.
# Subpart 3017.2—Options

**Parent topic:**PART 3017—SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS

## 3017.202 Use of options.

(a) Contracting officers shall not use unpriced options.   

## 3017.204 Contracts.

## 3017.204-90 Detention Facilities and Services (ICE).

The ICE Head of the Contracting Activity (HCA), without delegation, may enter into contracts of up to fifteen years' duration for detention or incarceration space or facilities, including related services.
November 1, 2011



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

VICTOR ZAVALA, JR. , Appellant

NO. 14

- 10

- 00286

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

____________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED , and that this decision be certified below for
observa nce.
Attachment

e. Chemica l Structure Diagram

[



### ]