alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE, LLP**

**INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-140007 on Form S-8 of our report (which reportexpresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding a change in the manner in which Guidance Software, Inc. accounts for share-based compensation in 2006) dated March 29, 2007, relating to the 2005 and 2006consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Guidance Software, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Guidance Software, Inc. for the year ended December 31,2006. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche, LLP 

Los Angeles,California 

March 29, 2007
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 73 (Tuesday, April 16, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 22525]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-08898]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID: DoD-2013-0057]

Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

AGENCY: Defense Logistics Agency, DoD.

ACTION: Notice to amend a System of Records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Logistics Agency is proposing to amend a system of 
records in its inventory of record systems subject to the Privacy Act 
of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

DATES: This proposed action will be effective on May 17, 2013 unless 
comments are received which result in a contrary determination. 
Comments will be accepted on or before May 16, 2013.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by any of the following methods:
    * Federal Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 
instructions for submitting comments.
    * Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 4800 Mark Center 
Drive, East Tower, 2nd Floor, Suite 02G09, Alexandria, VA 22350-3100.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and docket number for this Federal Register document. The general 
policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is 
to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet 
at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, 
including any personal identifiers or contact information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Jody Sinkler, DLA FOIA/Privacy Act 
Office, Headquarters, Defense Logistics Agency, ATTN: DGA, 8725 John J. 
Kingman Road, Suite 1644, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-6221, or by phone at 
(703)767-5045.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Defense Logistics Agency's system of 
record subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, 
have been published in the Federal Register and are available from the 
address in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
    The proposed changes to the record system being amended are set 
forth below. The proposed amendment is not within the purview of 
subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, 
which requires the submission of new or altered systems reports.

    Dated: March 20, 2013.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
S375.20

System name:
    Employee Relations under Negotiated Grievance Procedures (November 
29, 2011; 76 FR 73602).

Changes:
* * * * *

System location:
    Delete first paragraph and replace with ``Defense Logistics Agency 
Human Resources, Labor and Employee Relations Policy, 8725 John J. 
Kingman Road, Suite 3630, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-6221.''
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2013-08898 Filed 4-15-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

H.J.C.,

Appellant,

v.

J.Y.,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-1227

[November 19, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Fabienne Fahnestock, Judge; L.T. Case No. FMCE17-

13542.

Catherine L. Roselli, Esq., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

David M. Scott, Esq. of Florida Family Law Clinic, LLC, Fort Lauderdale, 

for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3301 

To suspend temporarily the duty on electronic under-the-cabinet mounting 

electric can openers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 26, 2006 

Mr. ALLEN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on electronic under-thecabinet mounting electric can openers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELECTRONIC UNDER-THE-CABINET MOUNTING 

4 ELECTRIC CAN OPENERS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.85.10 Electronic under-the-cabinet mounting 

electric can openers (provided for in subheading 8509.80.00) ................................ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 3301 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
#### § 920.21 Term of office.

The term of office of each member and alternate member of the committee shall be for two years from the date of their selection and until their successors are selected. The terms of office shall begin on August 1 and end on the last day of July, or such other dates as the committee may recommend and the Secretary approve. Members may serve up to three consecutive 2-year terms not to exceed 6 consecutive years as members. Alternate members may serve up to three consecutive 2-year terms not to exceed 6 consecutive years as alternate members.

[76 FR 4202, Jan. 25, 2011]
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Centenary International Corporation
      (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I,  Hector
      A.
      Patron Costas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)  the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/
              Hector A. Patron CostasHector A. Patron CostasChief Executive OfficerNovember 10,
              2006




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing
      certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-QSB solely pursuant to
      section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and are not being
      filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure
      document.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Harold Haff, Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Landman, Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Phears, Appellant.

Appeals by defendants Land-man and Haff from two judgments (one as to each of them) of the County Court, Nassau County, both rendered June 2, 1977, convicting each of them of a violation of subdivision 3 of section 107 of the Civil Service Law, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentences. Defendant Phears appeals from a judgment of the same court, rendered November 15, 1977, convicting him of a violation of the same statute, upon his guilty plea, and imposing sentence. By orders dated March 21, 1978, the Appellate Term, Ninth and Tenth Judicial Districts, reversed the judgments, on the law, and dismissed the indictments. On July 10, 1979 the Court of Appeals reversed the orders of the Appellate Term and remitted the cases to this court "for a review of the facts and questions of law not previously considered” *(People v Haff,*47 NY2d 695, 700). Judgments affirmed. No opinion. The cases are remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings so that execution of the judgments may be commenced or resumed. Rabin, J. P., Cohalan, Martuscello and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
Subpart 701.1—Purpose, Authority, Issuance    **Parent topic:** PART 701—FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION SYSTEM701.106 OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act.       (a) The following information collection and record keeping requirements established by USAID have been approved by OMB and assigned an OMB control number as specified below:          (48 CFR) AIDAR segment                                           OMB control No.752.219–8                                           0412–0520752.245–70                                           0412–0520752.245–71(c)(2)                                           0412–0520752.247–70(c)                                           0412–0520752.7001                                           0412–0520752.7002(j)                                           0412–0520752.7003                                           0412–0520752.7004                                           0412–0520752.7032                                           0412–0520(b) The information requested by the AIDAR sections listed in paragraph (a) is necessary to allow USAID to prudently administer public funds. It lets USAID make reasonable assessments of contractor capabilities and responsibility of costs. Information is required in order for a contractor and/or its employee to obtain a benefit-usually taking the form of payment under a Government contract.          (c) Public reporting burden for these collections of information is estimated as shown in paragraph (a) of this section. The estimated burden includes the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                            6380
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   275000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    275000
<INVENTORY>                                       5325
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 77705
<PP&E>                                           17993
<DEPRECIATION>                                    7781
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   87917
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           166081
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         83
<COMMON>                                         47286
<OTHER-SE>                                     9572834
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     87917
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                391899
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (391899)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (392699)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (392699)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
# 611.002 Policy.

**Parent topic:**PART 611—DESCRIBING AGENCY NEEDS
Subpart 1404.4 - Safeguarding Classified

Information Within Industry

Parent topic: PART 1404 - ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS

1404.402 General.

(a) The DOI has entered into an agreement with the DOD to be covered by the National Industrial

Security Program (NISP). The agreement is contained in 443 DM 1, Appendix 1.

(b) Classified acquisitions or contracts (see FAR 4.401) shall be subject to the instructions contained

in the DOD publications listed in FAR 4.402(b).

1404.403 Responsibilities of contracting officers.

(a) For proposed solicitations that may require access to Departmental classified information, the CO

shall consult with the Office of Managing Risk and Public Safety for guidance on NISP in accordance

with 443 DM 1.

(b) For proposed contracts where the contractor provides service for the handling and transmission

of registered or certified mail at activities that customarily receive and transmit classified

information (see FAR 4.401), the contractor shall be cleared to the degree of SECRET. This

clearance shall be obtained through the Office of Managing Risk and Public Safety in accordance

with 442 DM 8.

(c) For proposed contracts where guard services are assigned to safeguard Department activities in

possession of classified information (see FAR 4.401), review and approval shall be obtained from the

Office of Managing Risk and Public Safety in accordance with 442 DM 8.
Exhibit





Exhibit 10-3-4





TEGNA Supplemental Retirement Plan


Restatement dated August 7, 2007


Amendment Number 4


Pursuant to Article Seven of the TEGNA Supplemental Retirement Plan, Restatement dated August 7, 2007, as amended (the “Plan”), TEGNA Inc. hereby amends the Plan, effective December 31, 2017, as follows:
		
	1.
	Section 1.8 is amended by adding the following provisions to the end thereof:




Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary, effective December 31, 2017, the Monthly Benefit for each Grandfathered Participant shall be frozen, and such frozen benefit shall not be increased for earnings, credited service, cost of living adjustments or any other factor or reason after that date. 
		
	2.
	Section 2.1 is amended by adding the following provision to the end thereof:




Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary, effective December 31, 2017, the Monthly Benefit for each Grandfathered Participant shall be frozen, and such frozen benefit shall not be increased for earnings, credited service, cost of living adjustments or any other factor or reason after that date. 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, TEGNA Inc. has caused this Amendment Number 4 to the TEGNA Supplemental Retirement Plan, Restatement dated August 7, 2007 to be executed by its duly authorized officer as of November 7, 2017.


TEGNA INC.






By:                            
Name:  Todd A. Mayman
Title:  Executive Vice President
The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, United States District Judge for the Eastern 1

District of Missouri, adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Terry

I. Adelman, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-4336

___________

Johnathan Cole, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States District

v. * Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.

*

James Purkett, Superintendent at * [UNPUBLISHED]

Farmington Correctional Center, *

*

Appellee. *

*

___________

Submitted: May 15, 1998

Filed: July 8, 1998 

___________

Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Johnathan Cole appeals the district court's denial of his pro se petition for a writ 1

of habeas corpus. He claims that the prosecution's evidence in his state trial was so

constitutionally insufficient as to deny him due process of law under the Fourteenth

Amendment. Specifically, Cole argues that the testimony of four police officers who
We grant Cole's motion to supplement the record with a copy of the videotape 2

admitted into evidence at his trial. 

-2-

claim to have seen him in possession of cocaine is inconsistent with a videotape of the

drug transaction and Cole's subsequent arrest. The inconsistency, argues Cole, resulted

in a verdict unsupported by substantial evidence. The district court held that the

officers' credibility and inconsistencies in the testimony were questions for the jury and

did not go to the submissibility of the state's case. After carefully reviewing the entire

record, including the videotape, the trial transcripts, and the parties' briefs, we

2

conclude that the judgment of the district court was correct. Accordingly, we affirm.

See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

 ATTEST:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
89–008

106TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 106–989

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 114, MAKING FURTHER CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001

OCTOBER 18, 2000.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mr. LINDER, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 637]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 637, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration in the House of House

Joint Resolution 114, making further continuing appropriations for

fiscal year 2001, under a closed rule. The rule waives all points of

order against consideration of the joint resolution. The rule also

provides one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the

chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. Finally, the rule provides one motion to recommit.

Æ
-80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

 36

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

08/26

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 26 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.03 N 77.49 W Meters AGL
#### § 996.9 Inshell peanuts.

*Inshell peanuts* means peanuts, the kernel or edible portions of which are contained in the shell in their raw or natural state which are milled but unshelled.

[81 FR 50288, Aug. 1, 2016]
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22D0319. JUSTIN ANDRE LAMOUREUX v. ELLEN MARIE BROWN et al.

Acting pro se, Justin Andre Lamoureux filed this discretionary application in

the Supreme Court of Georgia, seeking review of the superior court’s orders granting

the respondents’ motions to dismiss his petition, in which he sought custody of his

minor child.

1 Case No. S22D0688. The Supreme Court found no basis for exercising

its jurisdiction in the case, and transferred the application to this Court. 

Under OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (11), direct appeals are permitted from “[a]ll

judgments or orders in child custody cases awarding, refusing to change, or

modifying child custody[.]” Thus, the superior court’s orders here are directly

appealable. Id.; see Woodruff v. Choate, 334 Ga. App. 574, 578-579 (1), (2) (a) (780

SE2d 25) (2015) (order dismissing petition to modify child custody is subject to

direct appeal). This Court will grant a timely application for discretionary review if

the lower court’s order is subject to direct appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (j).

Accordingly, this application is hereby GRANTED. 

Lamoureux shall have ten days from the date of this order to file a notice of

appeal in the superior court. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (g). If he has already filed a notice

of appeal in the superior court, then he need not file a second notice. The clerk of the

superior court is DIRECTED to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted

1 Respondents Ellen Brown, Eric Schreffler and Ann Schreffler filed a motion

to dismiss Lamoureux’s petition. Respondent Brett Waronicki also filed a motion to

dismiss the petition. The court granted both motions on the same date, in separate

orders.

April 26, 2022
to the Court of Appeals. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

04/26/2022
#### COLLINS, Appellant, v. LORDLY, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 12, 1914.)

Action by Dudleigh C. Collins against Alfred C. Lordly.

W. W. Pickard, of New York City, for appellant.

T. J. McManus, of New York City, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Order tiled.
Exhibit
32.2
  Section
1350 Certification





In connection with the quarterly report
of China Industrial Waste Management, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), I, Guo Xin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




November 12, 2010
                
                
                /s/
      Guo
      XinGuo
      XinChief
      Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.