alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Stephen B. Waters, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of National Property Investors 8;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 13, 2007

/s/Stephen B. Waters

Stephen B. Waters

Vice President of NPI Equity Investments, Inc., equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership
160 So.2d 231

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Ashton CHARGOIS.

No. 47119.

Feb. 14, 1964.

In re: State of Louisiana applying for a writ of mandamus and in the alternative for a writ of certiorari.

Writs refused. There is no right of appeal. Too, the search warrant was executed at a place other than that described in the warrant.

SUMMERS, J.,

is of the opinion the writ should be granted, as the execution of the search warrant was within the “place” described in the warrant. To hold otherwise is an unwarranted technical construction of the language of the warrant and unduly burdens the officers of the law in their effort to suppress a nefarious traffic in narcotics.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3026 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain camel hair not processed. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 24, 2006 

Mr. LIEBERMAN (for himself and Mr. DODD) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain camel hair not 

processed. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN CAMEL HAIR NOT PROCESSED. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.12.24 Camel hair, not processed in 

any manner beyond the 

degreased or carbonized condition (provided for in subheading 5102.19.20) ............ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 3026 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
# L_2019066DE.01000601.xml

| 7.3.2019 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 66/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2019

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 66/6

---

Berichtigung der Delegierten Verordnung (EU) Nr. 3/2014 der Kommission vom 24. Oktober 2013 zur Ergänzung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 168/2013 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates hinsichtlich der Anforderungen an die funktionale Sicherheit von Fahrzeugen für die Genehmigung von zwei- oder dreirädrigen und vierrädrigen Fahrzeugen

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 7 vom 10. Januar 2014
  )

Auf Seite 64, Anhang IX, Nummer 2.3.6.3.1. dritter Gedankenstrich:

Anstatt:

„bei Fahrzeugen mit mehr als einem Vorderrad oder mit einer Breite von über 1 000 mm müssen die inneren Ränder der Lichtaustrittsflächen der vorderen Fahrtrichtungsanzeiger mindestens 500 mm voneinander entfernt sein;“

muss es heißen:

„bei Fahrzeugen mit mehr als einem Vorderrad und mit einer Breite von über 1 000 mm müssen die inneren Ränder der Lichtaustrittsflächen der vorderen Fahrtrichtungsanzeiger mindestens 500 mm voneinander entfernt sein;“.

Auf Seite 64, Anhang IX, Nummer 2.3.6.3.1. fünfter Gedankenstrich:

Anstatt:

„bei Fahrzeugen mit mehr als einem Hinterrad oder mit einer Breite von über 1 000 mm müssen die inneren Ränder der Lichtaustrittsflächen der hinteren Fahrtrichtungsanzeiger mindestens 500 mm voneinander entfernt sein;“

muss es heißen:

„bei Fahrzeugen mit mehr als einem Hinterrad und mit einer Breite von über 1 000 mm müssen die inneren Ränder der Lichtaustrittsflächen der hinteren Fahrtrichtungsanzeiger mindestens 500 mm voneinander entfernt sein;“.

---
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Authority:

7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 800.95 Methods and order of performing weighing services.

(a) *Methods.* All Class X or Class Y weighing, checkweighing, checkloading, stowage examination, and other weighing services shall be performed by official personnel or approved weighers using approved weighing equipment and according to procedures prescribed in the regulations and the instructions.

(b) *Order of service.* Weighing services shall be performed, to the extent practicable, in the order in which requests are received. Official personnel must mark or stamp the date received on each written request for service. Precedence will be given to requests for weighing required by sections 5(a)(1) or 5(a)(2) of the Act.

[52 FR 6495, Mar. 4, 1987]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, February 18, 2010 at 2 p.m.

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.

Commissioner Walter, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session, and determined that no earlier notice thereof was possible.

The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, February 18, 2010 will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;

An adjudicatory matter;

Amicus consideration; and

Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:

The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: February 12, 2010.

Florence E. Harmon, 

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-3138 Filed 2-16-10; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
936.7101 Construction contracts.

(a) Inspection services may be performed by the architect-engineer responsible for the design.

Inspection services may not be procured from a construction contractor with respect to its own

work.

(b) When one contractor is to inspect the work of another, the inspection contractor will be given

written instructions defining its responsibilities and stating that it is not authorized to modify the

terms and conditions of the contract, to direct additional work, to waive any requirements of the

contract, or to settle any claim or dispute. Copies of the instructions will be given to the contractor

who is to be inspected, with a request to acknowledge receipt on a copy to be returned to the

contracting officer. In this manner, both contractors are on express notice of the authority and

limitations of the authority of the inspecting contractor.

Parent topic: Subpart 936.71 - Inspection and Acceptance
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. George Zervoulakos, Appellant, v. James J. Morrow, as Director of the Woodbourne Rehabilitation Center, Respondent.

Cooke, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered May 2,1969 in Sullivan County, which dismissed a writ of habeas corpus after a hearing. Nicholas Zervoulakos petitioned the *696Supreme Court, pursuant to section 206 of the Mental Hygiene Law (as amd. by L. 1966, eh. 192), that his son George, then 20 years old, be certified to the custody of the Narcotic Addiction Control Commission. Six days later, on June 20, 1967, two detectives came to the Zervoulakos home and removed the son, purportedly to question him concerning a burglary. He was removed the same day to the Edgecombe Rehabilitation Center and, upon examination by a commission physician, was found to be a narcotic addict within the meaning of the Mental Hygiene Law. Upon being brought before the Supreme Court in Kings County the next day, he was given a copy of the medical report and advised of his rights to a hearing, to counsel at every stage of the certification proceedings and of the assignment of counsel in ease of indigence. On June 27, 1967, appointed counsel waived a hearing and stated that appellant had spent time and study on the situation, understood the program and desired to submit to treatment. Appellant informed the court that he understood he was waiving a hearing and that, by waiving, he consented to be certified. In *Matter of James*(22 N Y 2d 545), where there was a hearing and jury trial, it was held that a determination of addiction, based almost entirely on information gained during a period of temporary detention which was illegal in that it violated constitutional rights, could not stand (p. 553). Here, however, appellant voluntarily and knowingly waived his right to a hearing, admitted his addiction and consented to certification and commitment, thus placing himself in the same position as a self-petitioner — and without an issue to be tried at a hearing or before a jury (cf. *Matter of Spence*v. *Narcotic Addiction Control Comm.,*30 A D 2d 810, mot. for Iv. to app. den. 22 N Y 2d 910). He was certified on his admission, consent and waiver in open court and not -on statements made during the detention (cf. *People*v. *Piracci,*24 A D 2d 892, cert. den. 385 U. S. 904; see, also, *People*V. *Bodgers,*15 N Y 2d 690; *People*v. *Nicholson,*11 N Y 2d 1067, cert. den. 371 U. S. 929). The requirement for the medical report, which applied after jurisdiction was obtained, was procedural in nature and, being nonjurisdictional, any defects regarding it were waived by relator *(People ex rel. McNeill*V. *Morrow,*32 A D 2d 375, 381; cf. *United States ex rel. Glenn*v. *McMann,*349 F. 2d 1018; *People*v. *Scott,*3 If Y 2d 148; *People ex rel. Noto*v. *Police Dept, of City of N. Y.,*283 App. Div. 872). Judgment affirmed, without costs. Reynolds, J. P., Staley, Jr., Greenblott, Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur in memorandum by Cooke, J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          21,324
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                26,841
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           102,573
<LOANS>                                        265,571
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,250
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 440,323
<DEPOSITS>                                     368,633
<SHORT-TERM>                                     8,296
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              6,343
<LONG-TERM>                                     18,143
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           348
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,560
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 440,323
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 12,374
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,631
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   785
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                15,790
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,638
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,175
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            8,615
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      818
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  30
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,008
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,819
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,819
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,893
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .55
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.06
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,074
<LOANS-PAST>                                     3,495
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   337
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  7,988
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,750
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,180
<RECOVERIES>                                       407
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,250
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,250
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
5108.9402 Policy.    (a) Except as provided in (b), contracting officers shall use contracts administered by the U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM) to procure foreign language support.       (b)(1) If the contracting officer contemplates using a non-INSCOM-administered contract to procure foreign language support, the contracting officer shall send an exception request to the following address no later than 90 days prior to the proposed contract award:       USARMY Pentagon HQDA DCS G-2 List Foreign Language Office       usarmy.pentagon.hqda-dcs-g-2.list.foreign-language-office@mail.mil.       (2) At a minimum, the request for exception shall include –       (i) The scope of the contract to include the mission, the number of linguists required, and the job description of the linguists;       (ii) A justification statement;       (iii) The type of funds to be used to pay for the contract;       (iv) Copies of the proposed contract and statement of work;       (v) Any special Government-provided benefits; and       (vi) The point-of-contact information for the proposed contract.       (3) HQDA Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence (G-2) will review the exception request and notify the requestor whether the proposed award can proceed.       (c) Army organizations with existing contracts for foreign language support outside the INSCOM-administered contracts shall contact the G-2 at the address provided in paragraph (b)(1) of this section to determine if movement of the requirements to the INSCOM-administered contracts is appropriate. **Parent topic:** Subpart 5108.94 - Foreign Language Support
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3451 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,3,5,-Triazine-2,4-diamine, 6-[2-(2- 

undecyl-1H-imidazol-1-yl)ethyl]-(9Cl). 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 6, 2006 

Mr. REID introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,3,5,-Triazine-2,4- 

diamine, 6-[2-(2-undecyl-1H-imidazol-1-yl)ethyl]-(9Cl). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 1,3,5,-TRIAZINE-2,4-DIAMINE, 6-[2-(2-UNDECYL4 1H-IMIDAZOL-1-YL)ETHYL]-(9Cl). 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.29.12 1,3,5,-Triazine-2,4-diamine, 6-[2-(2- 

undecyl-1H-imidazol-1-yl)ethyl]-(9Cl) 

(provided for in subheading 2933.29.90) 

(CAS No. 50729–75–4) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•S 3451 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
#### § 927.2 Act.

*Act* means Public Act No. 10, 73d Congress (May 12, 1933), as amended and as reenacted and amended by the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (48 Stat. 31, as amended; 7 U.S.C. 601 *et seq.*).
1442.602 Assignment and location.

The BPC has the authority to approve the appointment of a Corporate Administrative Contracting

Officer.

Parent topic: Subpart 1442.6 - Corporate Administrative Contracting Officer
#### In the Matter of the Claim of John L. Becker, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Memorandum by the Court. Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board denying unemployment insurance benefits to claimant-appellant. It is undisputed that, in April, 1965, the claimant, an Assistant Workmen’s Compensation Claims Examiner in the Hew York State Department of Labor, reached the mandatory retirement age of 70. His request for an extension of the retirement was denied, and he applied for retirement benefits under article 2 of the Retirement and Social Security Law which he has been receiving since May 1, 1965. It is also undisputed that, since 1941, the claimant had no other employer than the State of Hew York. The claimant, having retired from State service and being eligible for benefits under article 2 of the Retirement and Social Security Law is not entitled to unemployment insurance benefits based on wages paid to him by the State. (Labor Law, § 590, subd. 5; *Matter of McArdle [Corsi],*274 App. Div. 959; *Matter of Riley [Catherwood],*24 A D 2d 1040.) Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Staley, Jr., and Brink, JJ., concur.