alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3376 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3376

    To suspend temporarily the duty on Avermectin B, 1,4"-deoxy-4"-
                    methylamino-, (4"r)-, benzoate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 5, 2006

 Mr. Nelson of Nebraska introduced the following bill; which was read 
             twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on Avermectin B, 1,4"-deoxy-4"-
                    methylamino-, (4"r)-, benzoate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AVERMECTIN B, 1,4"-DEOXY-4"-METHYLAMINO-, (4"R)-, BENZOATE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.12.56      Avermectin B, 1,4"- Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         deoxy-4"-                                                          31/2009
                         methylamino-,
                         (4"R)-, benzoate
                         (CAS No. 155569-
                         91-8) (provided
                         for in subheading
                         3824.90.91 or
                         2932.29.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________ N o. 02

- 20

- 00158

- CR

____________ ______ ________ _

On Appeal from Criminal Dis trict Court No. 3 Tarrant Coun ty , Texas Tria l Court No. 1644029
Before Bassel, Womack, and Wallach, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### E X PARTE 

### R EKEEM 

### L A 

### C LINTON 

### D ORY2 MEMORANDUM OPINION After receiving App ellant Rekeem LaClinton Dory ’s pro se notice of appeal, we

sent a letter on Novem ber 13, 2020 , stating our concern that we lack ed jurisdiction over this appeal because we ha d been informed by the trial court clerk that the trial judge ha d not signed an order in this case. We gave the parties ten days from t he da te of our letter to f urnish this co urt with a signed copy of the order that A ppellant seeks to appeal. We stat ed that “ [i] f no o rder has been signe d and furnished by that date, this appeal will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 4 3.2(f). ” We
received no response a nd con firmed with the trial court clerk that no order had been signed as of Decembe r 4 , 2020

. The rules of appellate procedure provide t hat a criminal defendant has the right to appeal a judgment of guilt or other appeal able order. S ee Tex. R. App. P. 25 .2(a)(2). However, t here is no appealable order in this case, making Appellant ’ s notice of

a ppeal premature. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a) (2), 26.2(a)(1), 27.1(b). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal f or lack of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f) ; McCain v. State , No. 02

- 13

- 00599

- CR, 2014 WL 670640 , at *1 ( Tex. App.

— Fort Worth Feb. 20, 201 4, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op., not desig nated for publication ) (dismissing appeal for lack of jurisdiction because n otice of appeal was premature ).
Per Curiam
Do Not Publish Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)3 Delivered: December 17, 2020
Subpart 1315.2 - Solicitation and Receipt of Proposals and Information    **Parent topic:** PART 1315 - CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION1315.204 Contract format.       The designee authorized to grant exemptions from the uniform contract format is set forth in CAM 1301.70.1315.204-570 Part IV representations and instructions.       (a) *Section L, Instructions, conditions, and notices to offerors or respondents.*          (1)  			The contracting officer shall insert the provision 1352.215-70, *Proposal Preparation,* in all solicitations. Contracting officers should tailor the provision to best meet the Government's needs. Information requested from offerors in Volume II-Technical Proposal, must correspond to the evaluation factors. Contracting officers should not request information that will not be evaluated in accord with the stated technical evaluation factors. Should electronic submission be allowed by the CO, specific instructions must be added.          (2) Insert a provision similar to 1352.215-71, *Instructions for Oral Presentations,* in solicitations when oral presentations will be used. Contracting officers shall tailor the provision to suit their acquisition.          (3) The contracting officer shall insert the provision 1352.215-72, *Inquiries,* in solicitations as determined by the CO. This provision may be modified to satisfy the needs of specific procurements.          (b) *Section M, Evaluation factors for award.*          (1)  			The contracting officer shall insert provision 1352.215-73, *Evaluation Quantities-Indefinite Quantity Contract,* in solicitations for indefinite quantity and requirements contracts, as appropriate. This provision may be modified to satisfy the needs of specific procurements.          (2) The contracting officer shall insert the provision similar to 1352.215-74, *Best Value Evaluation,* for competitive, best value procurements, tailoring the language as appropriate. If clause 1352.215-74, *Best Value Evaluation,* is used, then clause 1352.215-75 *Evaluation Criteria,* must be used.          (3) The contracting officer shall insert a provision in all solicitations similar to 1352.215-75, *Evaluation Criteria,* to specify evaluation criteria, tailoring the language as appropriate. If the basis for award is lowest price technically acceptable, this must be stated.          (4) The contracting officer shall insert provision 1352.215-76, *Cost or Pricing Data,* in all solicitations when cost or pricing data is required under FAR subpart 15.4.1315.209 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.       The designee authorized to waive the examination of records by the Comptroller General is set forth in CAM 1301.70.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6011

ROGER BRUCE HERRELL, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. James E. Bradberry, Magistrate Judge. (CA-01-24) Submitted: March 21, 2002 Decided: March 29, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Roger Bruce Herrell, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* This case was decided by a magistrate judge exercising jurisdiction upon consent of the parties. 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(c) (West 1993 & Supp. 2001). 2 PER CURIAM: Roger Bruce Herrell appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). * We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Herrell v. Angelone, No. CA-01-24 (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 19, 2001; entered Nov. 20, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
1445.302 Contracts with foreign

governments or international organizations.

The HCA, after coordinating with the cognizant PMO, shall establish procedures to recover use costs

when foreign governments or international organizations request use of Government production and

research property

Parent topic: Subpart 1445.3 - Authorizing the Use and Rental of Government Property
1311.501 Policy.       The designee authorized as the head of the agency is set forth in CAM 1301.70.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1311.5 - Liquidated Damages
Exhibit 4.7


 





 


March
9, 2018


 


Securities and Exchange Commission


100 F Street, NE


Washington, D C 20549


 


RE: SB Financial Group, Inc.
— Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


SB Financial Group, Inc., an Ohio corporation (“SB
Financial”), is today filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) the Annual Report on Form 10-K
of SB Financial for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 (“SB Financial’s 2017 Form 10-K”).


 


Pursuant to the instructions relating to the Exhibits
in Item 601 (b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, SB Financial hereby agrees to furnish to the SEC, upon request, copies of instruments
and agreements defining the rights of holders of long-term debt and of the long-term debt of its consolidated subsidiaries, which
are not being filed as exhibits to SB Financial’s 2017 Form 10-K None of such long-term debt exceeds 10 percent of the total assets
of SB financial and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.


 


Very truly yours,


 


SB FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.


 


/s/ Anthony V. Cosentino


 


Anthony V. Cosentino


Executive Vice President and


Chief Financial Officer


 





	 	 	401 Clinton Street | Defiance, OH 43512
	 	 	P 419.783.8950 | F 419.782.6393
	 	 	YourSBFinancial.com
745.107 Contract clauses.       (a) The contracting officer must insert the clause at (48 CFR) AIDAR 752.245–71 in all contracts under which the contractor will acquire property for use overseas and the contract funds were obligated under a Development Objective Agreement (DOAG) (or similar bilateral obligating agreement) with the cooperating country.          (b) The contracting officer must insert the applicable clause as required in (48 CFR) FAR 45.107 and (48 CFR) AIDAR 752.245–70 in all contracts under which the contractor will acquire property with funds not already obligated under a DOAG (or similar bilateral obligating agreement) with the cooperating country.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 745.1—General
Editorial Note on Subpart A of Part 989
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 989 appear at 83 FR 53973, Oct. 26, 2018.

§ 989.53 Research and development. ( a ) *General.* The Committee, with the approval of the Secretary, may establish or provide for the establishment of projects involving production research, market research and development, marketing promotion including paid advertising, designed to assist, improve, or promote the production, marketing, distribution, and consumption of raisins in domestic and foreign markets. These projects may include, but need not be limited to those designed to: ( 1 ) Improve through research the accuracy of raisin production estimates;
( 2 ) Improve through research the preparation for market, sanitation, quality, condition, storability, processing, or packaging of raisins;
( 3 ) Ascertain through research the factors affecting acceptance of raisins by manufacturers or consumers;
( 4 ) Promote the marketing, distribution, or consumption of raisins in domestic and foreign markets by collecting data thereon, consulting with members of the trade, and making the information available to producers, handlers, and exporters; and
( 5 ) Promote the marketing, distribution, or consumption of raisins in foreign markets through the use of merchandising programs.
( b ) *Creditable expenditures.* The Committee, with the approval of the Secretary, may provide for crediting all or any portion of a handler's direct expenditures for marketing promotion, including paid advertising, that promotes the sale of raisins, raisin products, or their use. No handler shall receive credit for any allowable direct expenditures that would exceed the total of his assessment obligation which is attributable to that portion of his assessment designated for marketing promotion including paid advertising.
( c ) *Criteria.* Before any project involving marketing promotion, including paid advertising, and the
crediting of the handler's pro rata expense assessment obligation of handlers is undertaken pursuant to this section, the Secretary after recommendation by the Committee, shall approve appropriate criteria to effectively regulate such activity. [48 FR 32976, July 20, 1983, as amended at 83 FR 53969, Oct. 26, 2018]
#### Lois Strauss, Appellant, v David B. Strauss, Jr., Respondent. In

In an action, *inter alia,*to rescind a separation agreement, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered July 11, 1979, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the first cause of action in the complaint on the basis of collateral estoppel. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and motion denied, without prejudice to any appropriate motions for summary judgment. Special Term should not have granted the motion to dismiss since the divorce decree, granted in Nassau County in February, 1974, does not bar a subsequent action to set aside the separation agreement, executed in October, 1973 and which survived the decree, on the grounds of fraud, duress or overreaching (cf. *Steers v Steerg,*69 AD2d 858; *McCrensky v Schweitzer,*65 AD2d 568). While Special Term apparently treated the motion as one for summary judgment, it did not notify the *550parties of its intention to do so (see CPLR 3211, subd [c]; see, also, *Rubin v Rubin,*72 AD2d 536; *Shah v New York Foundling Hosp.,*69 AD2d 899). Under the circumstances, the allegations in the first cause of action are sufficient to constitute a valid cause of action. Hopkins, J. P., Mangano, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JEROME J. HERNANDEZ,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 136 EM 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 19th day of February, 2020, the “Petition to Allow Nunc Pro Tunc

Filing of a Petition for Allowance of Appeal” is GRANTED. Counsel is DIRECTED to file 

a Petition for Allowance of Appeal within 15 days.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Venture Lending & Leasing V, Inc. (the "Fund") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Martin D. Eng, Chief Financial Officer of the Fund, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Fund.





/S/ Martin D. Eng





Martin D. Eng


Chief Financial Officer


March 15, 2013
#### In the Matter of Alfawn F. Pettit, Respondent, v. Thomas J. Pettit, Appellant.

Order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated August 16, 1968, affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, appellant failed to sustain the burden of proof to show the invalidity of the marriage between the parties *(Matter of Durgo,*261 App. Div. 236, affd. 287 N. Y. 595; *Apelbaum*v. *Apelbaum,*7 A D 2d 911; *De Milio*v. *New York State Thruway Auth.,*235 N. Y. S. 2d 642). Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
Report
of Independent Registered Public
 Accounting
Firm
 
 
 To the
Board of Directors and shareholders of 
CoreLogic, Inc.:
 
 We
have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Reporton
Assessment of Compliance, that CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate
Services, Inc. (the "Company"), an indirect subsidiary of CoreLogic,
Inc. complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for all loans
for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the
Company served as the commercial tax service provider (the "Platform"),
as of December 31, 2013 and for the year then ended, only including
1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(v), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(2)(vii),
1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which the Company
has determined are applicable to the servicing activities performed by
it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the
Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our
examination.Our examination was conducted in accordance with
attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis,
evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing
criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of
selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining
whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance
with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to
the selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the
period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to
detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior
to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or
amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered
by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.In
our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2013 for all loans for commercial mortgage loan
outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the commercial
tax service provider is fairly stated, in all material respects./s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
 February
14, 2014
 
 
 PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP, 2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 1800, Dallas, Texas 75201
 P:(214) 999-1400, F: (214) 754-7991, www.pwc.com/us
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

RICHARD MARSHALL, *

*

v. * Civil Case No. 2:06-cv-701-ID-WO

*

CHRIS WEST, in his individual capacity, *

LASHUN HUTSON, in his individual capacity *

Defendants. *

CONFLICT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

COMES NOW Plaintiff in the above-styled matter and in accordance with the order of this

Court, making the following disclosure concerning parent companies, subsidiaries, partners, limited

liability entity members and managers, trustees (but not trust beneficiaries), affiliates, or similar

entities reportable under the provisions of the Middle District of Alabama’s General Order No. 3027:

This party is an individual. 

Respectfully submitted this the _26th___day of June, 2007.

/s/ Jay Lewis

JAY LEWIS

P.O. Box 5059

Montgomery, AL 36103

Phone: (334) 263-7733

Fax: (334) 832-4390

J-lewis@jaylewislaw.com

ASB-2014-E66J

Counsel for Plaintiff

Case 2:06-cv-00701-ID-CSC Document 19 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have served the foregoing on the following parties and/or counsel by

CM/ECF or by placing a copy of the same in the United States mail, postage prepaid and properly

addressed, on this__26th__day of June, 2007.

Gary C. Sherrer

Leura G. Canary

Stephen M. Doyle

James Pike

/s/ Jay Lewis

JAY LEWIS 

P.O. Box 5059

Montgomery, AL 36103

Phone: (334) 263-7733

Fax: (334) 832-4390

J-lewis@jaylewislaw.com

ASB-2014-E66J

Case 2:06-cv-00701-ID-CSC Document 19 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### § 986.32 Proprietary capacity.

*Proprietary capacity* means the capacity or interest of a grower or handler that, either directly or through one or more intermediaries or affiliates, is a property owner together with all the appurtenant rights of an owner, including the right to vote the interest in that capacity as an individual, a shareholder, member of a cooperative, partner, trustee or in any other capacity with respect to any other business unit.
PART 753—FORMS

Authority: Sec. 621, Pub. L. 87–195, 75 Stat. 445 (22 U.S.C. 2381), as amended; E.O. 12163, Sept.

29, 1979 44 FR 56673, 3 CFR, 1979 Comp., p. 435.

Source: 53 FR 50632, Dec. 16, 1988, unless otherwise noted.

Subpart 753.1—General

753.107 Obtaining forms.

Subpart 753.2—Prescription of Forms

753.270 Prescription of USAID forms.

Subpart 753.3—Illustration of Forms

753.300 Scope of subpart.

Parent topic: SUBCHAPTER H—CLAUSES AND FORMS

Subpart 753.1—General

753.107 Obtaining forms.

Copies of any USAID Form referenced in the AIDAIR may be obtained from the U.S. Agency for

International Development, Washington, DC 20523–0001, Attention: M/AS/ISS, Distribution, Room

B–929 N.S., or from the cognizant contracting officer.

Subpart 753.2—Prescription of Forms

753.270 Prescription of USAID forms.

The requirements for use of USAID forms are contained in parts 701 through 752 where the subject

matter applicable to the form is addressed.

Subpart 753.3—Illustration of Forms

753.300 Scope of subpart.

USAID forms are not illustrated in the AIDAR. Copies of any USAID form prescribed in the AIDAR

may be obtained as provided in 753.107.