alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

________________________ DIVISION

_________________________________, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. __________________

)

_________________________________, )

)

Defendants, )

CONFLICT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

COMES NOW ___________________, a in the above-captioned

matter, and in accordance with the order of this Court, making the following disclosure

concerning parent companies, subsidiaries, partners, limited liability entity members and

managers, trustees (but not trust beneficiaries), affiliates, or similar entities reportable under

the provisions of the Middle District of Alabama’s General Order No. 3047:

This party is an individual, or

This party is a governmental entity, or

There are no entities to be reported, or

The following entities and their relationship to the party are hereby reported:

Reportable Entity Relationship to Party

________________________________ _________________________________

________________________________ _________________________________

________________________________ _________________________________

________________________________ _________________________________

Date (Signature)

(Counsel’s Name)

 

Counsel for (print names of all parties)

Address, City, State Zip Code

 

Telephone Number

Northern

Willie McNair

Richard Allen, et al.

2:06cv695-WKW

Grantt Culliver

Holman Correctional Facility

6/20/2007

Warden

/s/ J. Clayton Crenshaw

Richard Allen, Grantt Culliver

11 South Union Street

Montgomery, AL 36130

(334) 242-7423

Defendant

J. Clayton Crenshaw

Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 67 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

________________________ DIVISION

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I,____________________________________, do hereby Certify that a true and correct copy

of the foregoing has been furnished by ___________________________(manner of service,

i.e., U.S. Mail, electronic mail, etc.) on this _______day of ____________ 20__, to:

Date Signature

Northern

J. Clayton Crenshaw

CM/ECF System

20th June

Stephanie L. Cohen, Vincent R. Fitzpatrick, Jr., Heather K. McDevitt,

Randall Susskind, and Cathleen Price

6/20/2007

07

/s/ J. Clayton Crenshaw

Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 67 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3279 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3279

   To suspend temporarily the duty on mini DVD camcorder with 8G HDD.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 26, 2006

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on mini DVD camcorder with 8G HDD.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MINI DVD CAMCORDER WITH 8G HDD.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.85.25        Mini-DVD camcorder,     Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           full multiformat                                                  31/2009          ''
                           readability with                                                                    .
                           patented laser
                           processor technology;
                           1.3 mega pixel CCD,
                           8G HDD, optical zoom,
                           USB 2.0 PC (provided
                           for in subheading
                           8525.40.80)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### JOHNSON, Respondent, v. RAVITCH et al., Defendants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 27, 1906.)

Action by Benjamin Johnson against David Ravitch and others.

No opinion. Order affirmed, on authority of Johnson v. Ravitch (decided herewith) 99 N. Y. Supp. 1059, with $10 costs and disbursements.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA - 2013 - 0702 Directorate Identifier: 2012NM181AD

SB - 328 - 52 - 460, R1 --- 8/17/11

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
INDEX OF THIRD SET OF LETTERS OF SUPPORT

1. State of Hawaii Department of Business, Economic Development & Tourism 

2. Maui County Council 

3. City Mill Company, Ltd. 

4. Kualoa Ranch Hawaii, Inc. 

5. Kyo-ya Hotels & Resorts, President Ernest K. Nishizaki 

Docket OST-2010-0018
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3073 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3073

             To suspend temporarily the duty on Indoxacarb.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

 Mr. Sessions introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To suspend temporarily the duty on Indoxacarb.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INDOXACARB.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.12.42      (4aS) -7-Chloro-2,  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         5-dihydro-2-                                                       31/2009
                         [[(methoxycarbony
                         l)[4-
                         (trifluoromethoxy
                         ) phenyl] amino]
                         carbonyl]-indeno
                         [1,2-e][1,3,4]
                         oxadiazine-4a
                         (3H)-carboxylic
                         acid methyl ester
                         (CAS No. 173584-
                         44-6) (provided
                         for in subheading
                         2934.99.16)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
939.7002 Contractor acquisition of

information technology.

(a) Management and operating (M&O) contracts. Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section,

M&O contractors and their subcontractors shall not be used to acquire information technology

unrelated to the mission of the M&O contract either for sole use by DOE employees or employees of

other DOE contractors, or for use by other Federal agencies or their contractors.

(b) Other than M&O contracts. Where it has been determined that a contractor (other than an M&O

contractor or its subcontractor) will acquire information technology either for sole use by DOE

employees or for the furnishing of the information technology as government-furnished property

under another contract, and after receiving written authorization from their cognizant DOE

contracting office pursuant to 48 CFR part 51, DOE contractors working under cost-reimbursementtype contracts may place orders against authorized contracts. All authorizations to contractors shall

expressly and specifically reference the restriction regarding contractor use of the items acquired,

cited at 951.102(e)(4)(iii).

(c) Consolidated contractor acquisitions. When common information technology requirements in

support of DOE programs have been identified and it is anticipated that the consolidation of such

requirements will promote cost or other efficiencies, the Designated Senior Official for Information

Management may authorize an M&O contractor to acquire information technology for use by the

following -

(1) One or more other contractor(s) performing on-site at the same DOE-owned or -leased facility as

the M&O contractor; or

(2) Other M&O contractors.

Parent topic: Subpart 939.70 - Implementing DOE Policies and Procedures
# L_2015074DE.01003801.xml

| 18.3.2015 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 74/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2015

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 74/38

---

Berichtigung der Richtlinie 2014/65/EU des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 15. Mai 2014 über Märkte für Finanzinstrumente sowie zur Änderung der Richtlinien 2002/92/EG und 2011/61/EU

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 173 vom 12. Juni 2014
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 173 vom 12. Juni 2014

Auf Seite 473, Artikel 89 Absatz 3 Satz 1:

anstatt:

„... und Artikel 76 Absatz 8 kann vom Europäischen Parlament oder vom Rat jederzeit widerrufen werden.“

muss es heißen:

„... und Artikel 79 Absatz 8 kann vom Europäischen Parlament oder vom Rat jederzeit widerrufen werden.“

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

RICHARD MARSHALL, *

*

v. * Civil Case No. 2:06-cv-701-ID-WO

*

CHRIS WEST, in his individual capacity, *

LASHUN HUTSON, in his individual capacity *

Defendants. *

MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL

COMES NOW Plaintiff Richard Marshall, by and through his attorney, to move the Court

to continue the trial of this cause until a later term of court and, as grounds, would show the

Court as follows:

1. The undersigned counsel for Plaintiff is representing defendant Winston Brent

Springford, Jr., in a five-count capital murder case arising from the 2004 deaths of his

parents.

2. The case number is CC-2006-1821, et seq., and is being tried by the Honorable William

Shashy of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit of Alabama.

3. The said case is being tried in Jefferson County, Alabama, and is presently set to start on

June 23, 2008, the same day as this Court has set the trial of the instant matter.

4. The Springford trial is expected to last between three and four weeks.

5. Counsel has present plans to be out of the United States for all or a large part of

September, 2008.

6. Counsel has conferred with counsel representing the defendants in this case, and they

have authorized the undersigned to represent that they have no objection to a continuance.

WHEREFORE, the premises considered, Plaintiff prays that the Court will continue the

Case 2:06-cv-00701-ID-CSC Document 42 Filed 05/12/2008 Page 1 of 2
trial of this cause to a trial term in October or later.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED on this the __12__ day of May, 2008.

/s/ Jay Lewis

JAY LEWIS, ASB-2014-E66J

LAW OFFICES OF JAY LEWIS, LLC

P.O. Box 5059

Montgomery, AL 36103

(334) 263-7733 (Voice)

(334) 832-4390 (Fax)

j-lewis@jaylewislaw.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this __12__ day of May, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing

to the following:

Alex Holtsford

Rick Howard

Daryl Masters

April McKay

GaryWillford

/s/ Jay Lewis

JAY LEWIS, ASB-2014-E66J

LAW OFFICES OF JAY LEWIS, LLC

P.O. Box 5059

Montgomery, AL 36103

(334) 263-7733 (Voice)

(334) 832-4390 (Fax)

j-lewis@jaylewislaw.com

Case 2:06-cv-00701-ID-CSC Document 42 Filed 05/12/2008 Page 2 of 2
225.870-7 Acceptance of Canadian supplies.       For information on the acceptance of Canadian supplies, see PGI                 225.870-7             .    **Parent topic:** 225.870 Contracting with Canadian contractors.
TDCJ Offender Details Page 1 of2 

['!i) TDCJ Home - New Offender Search 

Offender Information Details 

Return to Search list· , •I 

SID Number: 03180032 

TDCJ Number: 00612010 

Name: MACK,CRAIG 

Race: B 

Gender: M 

DOS: 1963-03-31 

Maximum Sentence Date: 

Current Facility: 

Projected Release Date: 

Parole Eligibility Date: 

Offender Visitation Eligible: 

LIFE SENTENCE 

BYRD 

LIFE SENTENCE 

NOT AVAILABLE 

NO 

The offender is temporarily ineligible for visitation. Please call the offender's unit for any 

additional information. 

The visitation information is updated once daily during weekdays and multiple times per day 

on visitation days. -

SPECIAL INFORMATION FOR SCHEDULED RELEASE: 

Scheduled Release Date: 

Scheduled Release Type: 

Scheduled Release Location: 

Parole Review Information 

Offense History: 

Offense 

Oat~ 

I 

Offense 

I 

Offender is not scheduled for release at this time. 

Will be determined when release date is scheduled. 

. Will be determined when release date is scheduled. 

Sentence 

Date County Case 

No. 

I 

Sentence (YYMM-D D) 

http://offender.tdcj.state.tx.us/OffenderSearch/offenderDetail.action?sid=03180032 

• 

5/8/2015
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JOSE MANUEL MALDONADO,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 63 MM 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 13th day of September, 2019, the Petition for Leave to File Petition 

for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2967 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2967

  To suspend temporarily the duty on AC electric motors of an output 
               exceeding 74.6 W but not exceeding 105 W.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 23, 2006

  Mr. Frist (for himself and Mr. Alexander) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on AC electric motors of an output 
               exceeding 74.6 W but not exceeding 105 W.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AC ELECTRIC MOTORS OF AN OUTPUT EXCEEDING 74.6 W BUT NOT 
              EXCEEDING 105 W.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.85.07        AC electric motors of   Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           an output exceeding                                               31/2009          ''
                           74.6 W but not                                                                      .
                           exceeding 105 W,
                           single phase; each
                           equipped with a
                           capacitor, a rotary
                           speed control
                           mechanism, and a
                           motor mounting
                           cooling ring
                           (provided for in
                           subheading
                           8501.40.40)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Nassau-Suffolk Realty Co., Inc., Appellant, v Donald E. Axinn, Respondent.

Appeal from order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, *809entered April 11, 1979, dismissed (see *Matter of Aho,*39 NY2d 241, 248). Judgment of the same court dated June 22, 1979, affirmed. No opinion. The defendant is awarded one bill of $50 costs and disbursements. Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Titone and Mangano, JJ., concur.
Case 2:06-cv-00616-MHT-SRW Document 6-4 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00616-MHT-SRW Document 6-4 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00616-MHT-SRW Document 6-4 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 3 of 3
Arches/Canyonlands - Worst - Total Extinction Arches/Canyonlands - Worst - SO4 ExtinctionSite Method Year NTotalExtinction Site Method Year NSO4ExtinctionCANY1 NIA 2000 20 31.58 CANY1 NIA 2000 20 6.34CANY1 NIA 2001 22 30.35 CANY1 NIA 2001 22 6.76CANY1 NIA 2002 22 36.92 CANY1 NIA 2002 22 3.98CANY1 NIA 2003 23 33.24 CANY1 NIA 2003 23 5.54CANY1 NIA 2004 22 26.46 CANY1 NIA 2004 22 5.3158.55 Total 27.92 Total31.71 Average 5.584 Average2000-2004 Average Annual Sulfate Shareof Particle Light Extinction 18%Arches/Canyonlands - Best - Total Extinction Arches/Canyonlands - Best - SO4 ExtinctionSite Method Year NTotalExtinction Site Method Year NSO4ExtinctionCANY1 NIA 2000 19 14.42 CANY1 NIA 2000 19 2.12CANY1 NIA 2001 21 15.12 CANY1 NIA 2001 21 2.31CANY1 NIA 2002 22 15.3 CANY1 NIA 2002 22 2.36CANY1NIA20022215.3CANY1NIA2002222.36CANY1 NIA 2003 22 13.99 CANY1 NIA 2003 22 1.94CANY1 NIA 2004 21 14.31 CANY1 NIA 2004 21 2.1473.14 Total 10.87 Total14.628 Average 2.174 Average2000-2004 Average Annual Sulfate Shareof Particle Light Extinction 15%
Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 9 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 1 of 1
DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY 

BOARD 

May 23, 1997 

A. Plutonium Reclamation Facility (PRF) Explosion Recovery: Babcock and Wilcox Hanford Co. (BWHC) 

management continues efforts to confirm safe conditions and restore building services to the PRF. The 

investigation team, led by DOE-RL, accompanied by BWHC personnel, entered the facility Friday, May 16, 

and again Wednesday, May 21. No imminent dangers were identified, however further inspections from outside 

the building indicate a tear in the roof that is also visible in a video taken from inside Room 40 (the site of the 

explosion) on May 21. The investigation team believes that the ventilation system continues to maintain a 

negative pressure in the building and that there is no air flow from Room 40 to the atmosphere. Radiological 

control technicians have verified no significant radiation levels or spread of contamination outside the building. 

Evidence collected from several sources during the week confirms the investigation team's belief that the cause 

of the explosion was a mixture of hydroxylamine nitrate and nitric acid in tank A109 in Room 40 of PRF. It 

appears that the mixture was inadvertently allowed to concentrate by evaporation over the course of several 

years until unstable concentrations were reached. Preliminary reports from operators at other facilities at 

Hanford indicate that no similar mixtures of chemicals exist on site. 

B. Investigation of Worker Injuries at Canister Storage Building (CSB): Investigation teams led by the 

contractor and by DOE-RL finished their interviews and field work this week and are preparing investigation 

reports. Duke Engineering Services, Hanford (DESH) management expects that CSB construction may restart 

next week. 

C. TWRS FY97 Budget Difficulties: TWRS' current FY97 budget is short by approximately $19 million (out of 

$336M). Due to significant previous cuts to the TWRS budget, additional cuts within TWRS could significantly 

effect DNFSB milestones. Per our discussions this week: 

1. DOE-RL insists that "there is no more money" and TWRS must live within its budget. 

2. LMHC has found only $9.5M in TWRS reductions which avoid DNFSB milestones. Some of these 

reductions, however, defer work which supports post-1997 commitments. 

3. DOE budget shifts to Brookhaven National Lab may further exacerbate the shortage. 

Additional detail is being obtained and will be provided in support of the Board's June 4-5 visit. 

D. External Contacts: The Oregon Department of Energy has invited the Site Representatives to address the 

Oregon Hanford Waste Board. The Oregon Board is composed of twenty Oregon State citizen, state and tribal 

government members. Our briefing is scheduled for June 25. 

cc: Board Members 

TO: G. W. Cunningham, Technical Director 

FROM: P.F. Gubanc & D.G. Ogg, Hanford Site Representatives 

SUBJECT: Activity Report for Week Ending May 23, 1997
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Samuel Valentine, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County, rendered July 12, 1967, convicting defendant of sodomy and rape, both in the first degree, and other crimes, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Brennan and Rabin, JJ., concur; Hopkins, J., dissents and votes to modify the judgment to the extent of remitting the action to the trial court for a hearing in accordance with the following memorandum: In my opinion, the *“*show-up ” procedure at bar is essentially indistinguishable from that condemned in *People*v. *Hill*(22 N Y 2d 686) and therefore this action should be remitted to the trial court for a hearing wherein the People should be required to prove by clear and convincing evidence that the trial ‘identification of defendant by the female he is alleged to have raped and sodomized was not tainted by the improper “ show-up ” *(People*v. *Hill, supra,*p. 688; Wall, Eye-Witness Identification in Criminal Cases, pp. 27-40).
§ 930.63 Deferment of restricted obligation. ( a ) *Bonding.* The Board, with the approval of the Secretary, may require handlers to secure bonds on deferred inventory reserve tonnage. Handlers may, in order to comply with the requirements of §§ 930.50 and 930.51 and regulations issued thereunder, secure bonds on restricted percentage cherries to temporarily defer the date that inventory reserve cherries must be held to any date requested by the handler. This date shall be not later than 60 days prior to the end of that crop year. Such deferment shall be conditioned upon the voluntary execution and delivery by the handler to the Board of a written undertaking within thirty (30) days after the Secretary announces the final restricted percentage under § 930.51. Such written undertaking shall be secured by a bond or bonds with a surety or sureties acceptable to the Board that on or prior to the acceptable deferred date the handler will have fully satisfied the restricted percentage amount required by § 930.51.
( b ) *Rulemaking authority.* The Board, with the approval of the Secretary, may adopt rules and regulations necessary and incidental to the administration of this section.
#### § 958.85 Derogation.

Nothing contained in this subpart is, or shall be construed to be, in derogation or in modification of the rights of the Secretary or of the United States to exercise any powers granted by the act or otherwise, or, in accordance with such powers, to act in the premises whenever such action is deemed advisable.