alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      35(a)





4828
      Loop
      Central Drive


Houston
      TX 77081


Telephone
      713-966-8966


Fax
      713-218-4595


www.littonloan.com


**SERVICER
      COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**





C-BASS
      2006-CB7 Trust








The
      undersigned officer of Litton Loan Servicing LP provides the Annual Statement
      as
      to Compliance as required by the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above
      referenced security and certifies that (i) a review of the activities of the
      Servicer during such preceding calendar year (or such shorter period in the
      case
      of the first such report) and of performance under this Agreement has been
      made
      under my supervision, and (ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such
      review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement
      in
      all material respects for 2006, except as disclosed below:





*Reconciliations
      for Asset-Backed Securities Related Bank Account -
      1122(d)(2)(vii)(D)*





Our
      investor bank account reconciliations included certain reconciling items that
      were not resolved within 90 calendar days of their original identification
      on
      eleven of sixty-three investor bank account reconciliations selected for
      testing. The sum of the reconciling items for those eleven reconciliations
      was
      $216,950.





*Adjustments
      to Interest Rates for Pool Assets With Variable Rates -
      1122(d)(4)(ix)*





Our
      testing of sixty-five adjustable rate mortgages revealed two instances where
      certain adjustable rate mortgages for which the interest rate reset in the
      servicing system did not agree to interest rates in the appropriate source
      index
      per the borrower’s note documents. These were the result of incorrect
      information transferring from the prior servicer. Additionally, the same
      sixty-five mortgages selected for testing included one instance where the
      adjustable rate mortgage payment change date in the servicing system did not
      agree to the loan documents.








Date:  February
      27, 2007








*/S/Elizabeth
      Folk*


__________________________________


Elizabeth
      Folk


Senior
      Vice President and


Chief
      Financial Officer


Litton
      Loan Servicing LP






Inv
        387-
        Servicer Compliance Statement
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

WILLIE MCNAIR, )

)

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-695-WKW

)

RICHARD ALLEN, et al., )

)

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs, )

 

JAMES CALLAHAN, )

)

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-919-WKW

)

RICHARD ALLEN, et al., )

)

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs, )

ORDER

Upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 80) filed on

August 16, 2007, it is ORDERED that the motion be submitted without oral argument on September

11, 2007.

It is further ORDERED that plaintiff file a response which shall include a brief on or before

September 4, 2007. The Defendants may file a reply brief on or before September 11, 2007.

1. Briefs in support of or in opposition to any motion generally should not exceed

25 pages. In all cases in which briefs exceed 25 pages, counsel must include a table of contents

indicating the main sections of the brief, the principal arguments and citations to authority made in

each section, and the pages on which each section and any sub-sections may be found.

Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 84 Filed 08/22/2007 Page 1 of 2
2. The parties are required to submit or mail a paper courtesy copy of briefs and

supporting evidence to the Chambers of the undersigned. 

3. For those submissions (including briefs and evidentiary materials) that exceed 25

pages, the paper courtesy copy shall be bound in a three-ring binder and tabbed.

4. Any discussion of evidence in a brief must include the specific reference, by name

or document number and by page and line, to where the evidence can be found in the supporting

evidentiary submission or in any document filed with the court.

5. Failure to comply strictly with this Order for all future filings may result in the

striking of the filing or other appropriate sanctions.

DONE the 22nd day of August, 2007.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 84 Filed 08/22/2007 Page 2 of 2
DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY 

BOARD 

January 3, 1997 

Mr. Gubanc and Mr . Ogg were on leave Monday through Wednesday. 

A. Fluor Daniel Hanford (FDH) ES&H Management Plan: As discussed in our December 20, 1996, report, 

FDH issued the final ES&H Management Plan to DOE-RL at the end of December. DOE-RL's initial reaction is 

that the ES&H Plan does not provide any specifics as to how work will actually be accomplished nor does it 

attempt to integrate the variety of other ES&H-related plans currently called for by the contract. We agree. 

DOE-RL expects to prepare and issue its response to FDH in January. Current sentiments are to reject the plan 

and withhold some portion of the $1.3M performance fee associated with this contract deliverable. DOE-RL 

and FDH's path forward beyond this, however, is not yet clear. 

On a related note, the following ES&H-related plans have also been submitted to date by FDH as required by 

their contract: 

1. Management and Integration Plan 

2. Systems Engineering Management Plan 

3. Internal Audit Plan 

4. Sitewide Qualification and Training Plan 

5. Quality Assurance Plan 

Copies have been requested. As noted with the ES&H Plan above, it is not yet clear to us how these plans fit 

together to form an "integrated safety management system". The implication is that FDH is just working to 

generate contract deliverables but has not yet started to integrate them. We are continuing to pursue this matter 

with DOE-RL management. 

B. FDH Overhead Growth: FDH provides certain site-wide services (e.g., training) and assesses an overhead 

"tax" on the various projects to pay for them. FDH has recently indicated that the overhead costs are higher than 

planned and so will increase this tax accordingly. Since the site's overall budget is fixed, this overhead growth 

must be funded out of the existing project budgets thus reducing the funds available to perform project work. 

We suggest the Board specifically ask DOE-RL about this when it is briefed on the Hanford spent fuel program 

on January 17th. 

C. Acts of Nature: Starting December 25, 1996, record snowfalls blanketed the area making outdoor activities 

and vehicle movement extremely difficult and hazardous. Extended rains and warm temperatures starting 

December 31, have cleared away most of the snow. 

On January 1, 1997, an earthquake measuring 3.7 on the Richter scale was observed in Yakima, WA. Yakima is 

approximately fifty miles, due west of the Hanford 200 Area. 

D. New Deputy Manager: Last week, DOE-RL announced that Mr. Lloyd Piper has been appointed the Deputy 

Manager for DOE-RL. Mr. Piper has been acting in this capacity since September 1996. 

TO: G. W. Cunningham, Technical Director 

FROM: P.F. Gubanc & D.G. Ogg, Hanford Site Representatives 

SUBJECT: Activity Report for Week Ending January 3, 1997
cc: 

Board Members
Exhibit
13.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of Rodman International Enterprise II,
Ltd.(the "Company")
on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Kirk M. Warshaw, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:
June 23, 2010





/s/ Kirk M. WarshawKirk
      M. WarshawChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)





A signed
original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

April 11, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

133276 Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

RAYMOND O’NEAL, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 133276 

 COA: 274570 

Wayne CC: 05-515351-NH

ST. JOHN HOSPITAL & MEDICAL 

CENTER and DR. RALPH DILISIO, 

Defendants-Appellants, 

and 

DR. EFSTATHIOS TAPAZOGLOU,

Defendant. 

_________________________________________/ 

By order of March 7, 2007, this Court granted immediate consideration and 

ordered a stay of trial court proceedings. On order of the Court, the application for leave 

to appeal the February 8, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant 

to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the 

Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted. We further ORDER that the stay 

entered by this Court on March 7, 2007, remains in effect until completion of this appeal. 

On motion of a party or on its own motion, the Court of Appeals may modify, set aside, 

or place conditions on the stay if it appears that the appeal is not being vigorously 

prosecuted or if other appropriate grounds appear. 

WEAVER, J., would deny leave to appeal as she is not persuaded of the need for 

immediate appellate review. 

d0404 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 11, 2007 

 Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Docket ID FEMA-2010-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1946-DR]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (FEMA-1946-DR), dated October 26, 2010, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         November 29, 2010.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of October 26, 2010.

Cayey, Ciales, Corozal, and San Lorenzo Municipalities for Public Assistance.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2010-31286 Filed 12-13-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
1332.003 Simplified acquisition procedures

financing.

Contract financing may be provided for purchases made under the authority of FAR Part 13.

Contract financing shall be made in accordance with FAR Part 32.

Parent topic: PART 1332 - CONTRACT FINANCING
§ 917.45 Inspection and certification. ( a ) Whenever the handling of any variety of a particular fruit is regulated pursuant to § 917.41 or § 917.42, each handler who handles such fruit shall, prior thereto, cause such fruit to be inspected by the Federal or Federal-State Inspection Service: *Provided,* That inspection and certification shall not be required if such fruit has previously been so inspected and certified. Promptly after inspection and certification, each such handler shall submit, or cause to be submitted, to the commodity committee a copy of the certificate of inspection issued with respect to such fruit. The commodity committees may, with the approval of the Secretary, prescribe rules and regulations waiving the inspection requirements of this section where it is determined that inspection is not available: *Provided,* That all shipments made under such waiver shall comply with all regulations in effect.
( b ) The Control Committee may enter into an agreement with the Federal and Federal-State Inspection Services with respect to the costs of the inspection required by paragraph (a) of this section, for any or all fruits, and may collect from handlers their respective pro rata shares of such costs.
Effective Date Note
Effective Date Note: At 76 FR 66605, Oct. 27, 2011, § 917.45 was suspended indefinitely, effective Oct. 28, 2011.
#### § 70.42 Use of facsimile forms.

Using or attempting to use a form which simulates in whole or in part any certificate, symbol, stamp, label, seal, or identification authorized to be issued or used under the regulations in this part.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Outdoor Channel Holdings,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Perry T. Massie, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best
of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
         in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.

/s/ Perry T. Massie
-----------------------------

Chief Executive Officer
April 30, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Outdoor Channel Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Outdoor
Channel Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 33 Filed 12/13/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 33 Filed 12/13/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 33 Filed 12/13/2006 Page 3 of 3
725.704 Geographic Code waivers.       (a) Authority to approve waivers of source, nationality, and transportation services requirements, pursuant to 22 CFR part 228, subpart D, is set forth in ADS Chapters 103 and 310.          (b) If a Geographic Code other than Code 937 is authorized by a waiver, the contracting officer must insert the authorized geographic code approved in the waiver, in the Schedule of the contract as required in 725.702. In addition, the contracting officer must place a copy of the approved geographic code waiver in the official contract file.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 725.70—Source and Nationality
Case 5:98-cv-00179-SPM Document 23 Filed 06/07/02 Page 1 of 2
Case 5:98-cv-00179-SPM Document 23 Filed 06/07/02 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 17 Filed 12/04/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 17 Filed 12/04/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 17 Filed 12/04/2006 Page 3 of 3
#### § 983.66 Records.

Records of pistachios received, held and shipped by him, as will substantiate any required reports and will show performance under this part will be maintained by each handler for at least three years beyond the crop year of their applicability.

[69 FR 17850, Apr. 4, 2004. Redesignated at 74 FR 56541, Nov. 2, 2009]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

 _______________________________

JAMES ARTHUR CULBRETH, #214 203 *

Petitioner, *

 v. * 2:06-CV-690-MEF

 

GWENDOLYN MOSLEY, WARDEN, et al., *

Respondents. *

 _______________________________

ORDER ON MOTION

Upon consideration of Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis,

it is 

ORDERED that the motion (Doc. No. 3) be and is hereby GRANTED.

DONE, this 14th day of August, 2006.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00690-MEF-SRW Document 4 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### § 945.110 Order.

*Order* means Order No. 945, as amended, effective September 1, 1958 (§§ 945.1 through 945.91) regulating the handling of Irish potatoes grown in Malheur County, Oregon, and the counties of Adams, Valley, Lemhi, Clark, and Fremont in the State of Idaho, and all of the counties in Idaho lying south thereof.
SUBPART 12.4 – UNIQUE REQUIREMENTS REGARDING TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS     **Parent topic:** PART 12 –– ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL ITEMS12.403 Termination.     (b) *Policy.*Contracting officers shall             coordinate contract/order termination actions with the CoCO, HCO and legal counsel and,             if the contractor is a small business concern, with the Office of Small Business             Programs (OSBP). The HCO and HCA and will be updated in weekly DITCO SITREPs.         ../media/DARS-image1.png
Case 2:06-cv-00714-MHT-WC Document 8 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 6 Filed 09/05/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 6 Filed 09/05/2006 Page 2 of 2
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Report ongoals and priorities for Arctic research**** 
SuDocNumber: NS 1.2:2001002477
ItemNumber:0834-C(online)
CGPsystem Number: 000529095
 
1999
2001
2005
 **
Opinion issued December 4, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 14 - 00 741 - CV

——————————— METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY , Appellant V . ALLISON MCKENZIE , Appellee

On Appeal from the 1 57 th Judicial District C ourt

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 20 12 - 13289
MEMORANDUM OPINION A ppellant, Metropolitan Transit Authority, h a s filed a motion to dismiss its appeal with prejudice because it has settl ed the case and request s that all costs be assessed against the party incurring the same. Although there is no certificate of conference, this motion has been on file with the Court for more than 10 days and2

no party has responded to t he motion

. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 10. 1(a)(5), 10. 3(a)(2). N o other party has filed a notice of appeal and no opinion has issued

. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.1(a)(1), (c). Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal , with costs to be taxed against the party who incurred the same

. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.1(a)(1) , (d), 43.2(f)

. We dismiss any pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes , Higley, and Brown

.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

June 28, 2005

Before

Hon. FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge

Hon. ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge

Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge

Nos. 02-3238

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

LISSETT RIVERA,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United

States District Court for the

Northern District of Illinois,

Eastern Division.

No. 98 CR 923

Blanche M. Manning, Judge.

Order

 The court’s opinion of June 16, 2005, is amended on page 4. The last paragraph of

the opinion shall be replaced with the following language:

 By deciding not to take a cross-appeal, the United States has ensured that Rivera's

sentence cannot be increased. See El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. Neztsosie, 526 U.S.

473, 479-82 (1999). (Earlier decisions, such as United States v. Schmeltzer, 960 F.2d

405, 408-09 (5th Cir. 1992), holding that a court of appeals may increase a

defendant's sentence whether or not the prosecutor filed a notice of appeal, do not

survive Neztsosie.) But the lack of a cross-appeal does not entitle Rivera to another

shot at a sentence below 97 months, if the only lawful outcome on remand would

be application of the statutory minimum. It is accordingly unnecessary for us to

consider whether Rivera's sentencing range under the Guidelines was calculated

correctly; she cannot benefit from resentencing. Nor is a remand under Paladino

appropriate, for Booker does not confer on district judges any discretion to give

sentences below statutory floors. Any error the district judge may have made in

resolving factual disputes in order to apply the Guidelines was harmless. Cf. United

States v. Lee, 399 F.3d 864 (7th Cir. 2005).