alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-35 (c)
(logo) imb
IndymacBank


REG AB 1123 Statement of Compliance


I am an authorized officer for IndyMac Bank, F.S.B, the servicer for the
transactions listed on the attached schedule and I certify:

a) A review of IndyMac Bank's activities during the reporting period and of its
performance under the applicable servicing agreement has been made under my
supervision.

b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, except as set forth below
IndyMac Bank has fulfilled all of its obligations under the agreement in all
material respects throughout the reporting period.

c) None


By: /s/ Robert M. Abramian
Robert M. Abramian
First Vice President
Home Loan Servicing
Investor Reporting
Indymac Bank


By: /s/ Bart Vincent
Bart Vincent
First Vice President
HLS-Finance
Financial
Indymac Bank


Prepared for: Wells Fargo Bank

Date: February 28, 2007

Ref: EXHIBIT A


www.indymacbank.com

7700 W. Parmer Lane, Bldg D, Austin, TX 78729
Tel: 512.250.2700


(page)


EXHIBIT A

849 GSR 2006-1F 1/30/06
902 BSALTA 2006-1 1/30/06
840 DBALT 2006-AR1 1/31/06
918 BAYVIEW 2006-A 02/08/06
213 GSR 2006-2F
214 GSR 2006-3F 03-30-06
159 GSR 2006-0A1 8/24/06
229 MASTR 2006-1 03-29-06
223 DBALT 2006-AF1 03-31-06
231 HARBORVIEW 2006-2
233 LUMINENT 2006-3 (4-28-06)
287 LUMINENT 2006-5 (6-29-06)
454 LUMINENT CONDUIT 12MAT WLS 11/27/06
5001 LUMINENT 12MAT CONDUIT WLS 12/27/06
235 BAFC 2006-D 04/28/06
219 GSR 2006-5F 5/26/06
809 GSR 2006-6F (GS) 6/30/06
808 HARBORVIEW 2006-6 6/30/06
807 DBALTA 2006-AR 2 6/30/06
921 BSALTA 2006-4 6/30/06
285 MALT 2006-3 (6-30-06)
141 BSALTA 2006-5 7/28/06
278 GSAMP 2006-S4 (6-9-06)
199 HARBORVIEW 2006-8 (GW) 8/30/06
430 LUMINENT 2006-6 092806
432 MLMI 2006-F1 (ML) 09/29/06
379 CSMC 2006-8 09/29/06
378 BAFC 2006-H 9/29/06
178 MARM 2006-0A2 11/15/06
296 GSAA 2006-17 10/30/06
297 DBALT 2006-AR5 10/30/06
442 CSMC 2006-9 10/30/2006
440 ITF CSAB 2006-3 10/31/2006
456 JPALT 2006-S4 11/29/06
457 BCAP 2006-AA2 11/30/2006
458 ACE 2006-SD3 11/30/06
4101 DBALT 2006-AR6 12/15/06
4102 HARBORVIEW 2006-14 12/22/06
4103 MSM 2006-17XS 12/28/06
4104 GSR 2006-10F 12/29/06
4110 LUMINENT 2006-7 12/14/2006
4105 JPMMT 2006-S4 12/21/06
4106 GSAA 2006-20 12/29/06
4111 BSALTA 2006-8 12/28/06
# SUBPART 5.3 –– SYNOPSIS OF CONTRACT AWARDS

**Parent topic:**PART 5 –– PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONS

## 205.303 Announcement of contract awards.

(a)(i) For contract actions awarded by a DISA contracting officer, regardless of the mission partner, the contracting officer shall prepare a Public Announcement when the face value of a contractual action exceeds $7.5M.

(S-90)  Required format for a “Public Announcement” is in the DARS PGI 205.303(a)(i)(S-90).

(S-91) Procedures for preparation and routing the Public Announcement is in the DARS PGI 205.303(a)(i)(S-91).
Case 1:06-cv-00709-MHT-DRB Document 3-3 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00709-MHT-DRB Document 3-3 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 2 of 2
ANNEX 6 - CONSOLIDATED UNDEFINITIZED CONTRACT ACTION (UCA) MANAGEMENT REPORT       In accordance with 5217.7405, Plans and Reports, each contracting activity shall submit a Consolidated UCA Management Report, which provides the following information:          Contract Number          Task Order/Delivery Order Number (if applicable)          Program Description/Reason for Award          Date the Action was Awarded          Is the Action an Undefinitized Contract Action (UCA) or Unpriced Change Order?          Original Due Date for Definitization          Date Qualifying Proposal Received          Extended Date for Definitization          Date of Definitization Modification (if Definitized)          Negotiated Amount (if Definitized)          Profit/Fee Percentage Negotiated (if Definitized)          Contract Type (if Definitized)          Was the contract type risk value used for the objective profit/fee in the record of weighted guidelines in the LOW end of the designated range? If NO, provide a justification in column W comments.          Estimated percentage of actual costs incurred prior to definitization (if Definitized)          Reporting Date          Calculated Due Date (calculated field)          Report Date or Definitization Date (calculated field)          # Days Before/Past Scheduled Definitization Date (calculated field)          UCA/UCO Age Greater than 360 Days (calculated field)          Subject to Definitization Rules? (Yes/No)          Not to Exceed Amount ($)          Amount Obligated ($)          % of NTE (calculated field)          Reason for Definitization Delay          Comments          Agency or Department          To standardize report submissions, use the UCA reporting template of DFARS PGI          217.7405(2)(ii) available at the following website:          http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/pgi/pgi_htm/PGI217_74.htm.          *Note: There are five automatic-calculated fields in this new template.*
| **National Center    for     Health Statistics            Division of Data     Services            6525 Belcrest Road     Hyattsville, MD     20782-2003     (301)458-4636      **

 
In 10 seconds,

you will be sent to the    new location for this page.

**http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis.htm**

Please  update your    bookmarks.

 

This page last reviewed July 26, 2000

**U.S.    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES****Centers    for Disease Control and Prevention**    National Center for Health Statistics    Division of Data Services     Hyattsville, MD    20782-2003    (301) 458-4636
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
ANNEX 9 - GOVERNMENT-FURNISHED

PROPERTY PREAWARD COMPLIANCE

CHECKLIST

Per SECNAVINST 5200.43, the Government-Furnished Property Preaward Compliance Checklist,

SECNAV 5200/2, is to be included with the business clearance.
Form Instructions: In addition to the instructions at the top of the form, the following instructions

apply.

Block 1: Contract/Solicitation #. Insert the contract/solicitation number.
Block 2: Mod/TO/DO. Insert the modification number, delivery order (DO) number or task order (TO)

number as appropriate. If the action is a modification of a DO or TO, insert the DO/TO number

followed by the modification number.

Block 3: Program Name. A short description of the program name the GFP is supporting.

Block 4: Contracting Officer Name. Insert the contracting officer name.

Block 5: Program Manager (PM) Name. Insert the PM name.

Block 6: Period of Performance (POP) Start Date. Insert the POP start date.

Block 7: POP End Date. Insert the POP End Date

Block 8-16: Indicate if the clause was included in the Block 1 solicitation/contract number reported,

as required by FAR and DFARS. Use the pull-downs on the right side of the right-hand column to fill

the entries. Only the following phrases are to be used; Included, Not Included, Not Applicable (N/A).

When “Not Included” is used, provide an explanation for the contract file as to why the required

clause was not included in the solicitation, contract, modification, DO or TO.

Block 17: Indicate that the OSD form containing the GFP requirements has been completed and

validated per PGI 245.103-72. Only use "N/A" if no GFP is planned.

Block 18: Indicate that a written justification to provide GFP was provided by the requiring official

and is included in the contract file per FAR 45.102(b) and PGI 245.103-70. Only use "N/A" if no GFP

is planned.

Block 19a: Date of Review. Insert Date of Review.

Block 19b: Contracting Officer Name and Title. Insert the Contracting Officer name and title.

Block 19c: Contracting officer signature. The form includes electronic signature provisions.
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 82 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 82 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 82 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 82 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 4 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 82-2 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 82-2 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 82-2 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




The undersigned, Lee Tong Tai, the Chief Executive Officer, and Loke Hip Meng, the Chief Financial Officer, of Hubei Minkang Pharmaceutical Ltd. (the “Company”), each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Lee Tong TaiLee Tong TaiChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Date:  April 16, 2013/s/ Loke Hip MengLoke Hip MengChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer andPrincipal Accounting Officer)Date:  April 16, 2013




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

LUMBERMAN'S UNDERWRITING )

ALLIANCE, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

v. ) CASE NO. 3:06-cv-645-MEF

)

EMORY LEE YOUNG, )

)

Defendant. )

O R D E R

This cause came before the Court at a status conference on February 2, 2007. Upon

consideration, it is hereby ORDERED that:

(1) Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend to Add a Party (Doc. # 11), filed January

23, 2007, is GRANTED;

(2) all deadlines set out in the Uniform Scheduling Order (Doc. # 5), filed August 25,

2006, are SUSPENDED;

(3) the parties shall file an amended Rule 26(f) report upon appearance of counsel for

Defendant Berry;

(4) the Joint Motion to Extend Certain Deadlines and Amend Scheduling Order (Doc.

# 10), filed January 19, 2007, is DENIED as moot; and

(5) the Court encourages the parties, if possible, to expedite the exchange of discovery

already conducted in hopes that this case can be reset back on the Court’s June 25, 2007

Eastern Division of the Middle District of Alabama docket.

Case 3:06-cv-00645-MEF-TFM Document 13 Filed 02/02/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

DONE this the 2 day of February, 2007. nd

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00645-MEF-TFM Document 13 Filed 02/02/2007 Page 2 of 2
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2948 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain women’s footwear with coated 

or laminated textile fabrics. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 23, 2006 

Mr. CARPER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain women’s 

footwear with coated or laminated textile fabrics. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN WOMEN’S FOOTWEAR WITH COATED 

4 OR LAMINATED TEXTILE FABRICS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 2948 IS 

‘‘ 9902.64.01 Women’s footwear valued 

over $20/pair designed to be 

worn over, or in lieu of, 

other footwear as a protection against water, oil, 

grease or chemicals or cold 

or inclement weather where 

such protection includes protection against water that is 

imparted by the use of a 

coated or laminated textile 

fabric (except footwear with 

waterproof injection molded 

bottoms, i.e. comprising a 

complete outer sole and all 

or part of the upper) (provided in subheading 

6402.91.50) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
#### § 966.15 Committee.

*Committee* means the Florida Tomato Committee, established pursuant to § 966.22.
#### TALBOT, Respondent, v. GOODWIN, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 15, 1906.)

Action by Ashton B. Talbot against Harry B. Goodwin. impleaded, etc. J. 0. Oldinixon, for appellant. P. L. Klock, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed.
#### § 986.62 Inter-handler transfers.

Any handler inside the production area, except as provided for in § 986.61(h) and (i), Assessments, may transfer inshell pecans to another handler inside the production area for additional handling, and any assessments or other marketing order requirements with respect to pecans so transferred may be assumed by the receiving handler. The Council, with the approval of the Secretary, may establish methods and procedures, including necessary reports, to maintain accurate records for such transfers. All inter-handler transfers will be documented by forms or electronic transfer receipts approved by the Council, and all forms or electronic transfer receipts used for inter-handler transfers shall require that copies be sent to the selling party, the receiving party, and the Council. Such forms must state which handler has the assessment responsibilities.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF NATIONAL PROPERTIES INVESTMENT TRUST AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS     
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          75,054
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,196
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               136,811
<PP&E>                                       1,565,305
<DEPRECIATION>                                 648,260
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,053,856
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,771
<BONDS>                                        579,186
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,735,447
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,053,856
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               260,265
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  184,054
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                73,933
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              46,618
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,620
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,620
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,620
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
Subpart 745.1—General    **Parent topic:** PART 745—GOVERNMENT PROPERTY745.107 Contract clauses.       (a) The contracting officer must insert the clause at (48 CFR) AIDAR 752.245–71 in all contracts under which the contractor will acquire property for use overseas and the contract funds were obligated under a Development Objective Agreement (DOAG) (or similar bilateral obligating agreement) with the cooperating country.          (b) The contracting officer must insert the applicable clause as required in (48 CFR) FAR 45.107 and (48 CFR) AIDAR 752.245–70 in all contracts under which the contractor will acquire property with funds not already obligated under a DOAG (or similar bilateral obligating agreement) with the cooperating country.
Exhibit A

Case 5:20-cv-00214-TKW-MJF Document 23-1 Filed 07/23/21 Page 1 of 3
Case 5:20-cv-00214-TKW-MJF Document 23-1 Filed 07/23/21 Page 2 of 3
Case 5:20-cv-00214-TKW-MJF Document 23-1 Filed 07/23/21 Page 3 of 3
#### William Higgins, Respondent, v Prudential Grace Lines, Inc., Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered May 21,1980, dismissed, without costs or disbursements. Said order was superseded by a further order of the same court, dated June 25, 1980, which, upon reargument, adhered to its original determination. Order dated June 25,1980 affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. No opinion. Hopkins, J. P., Titone, Mangano and Gibbons, JJ., concur.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 04083

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 04083\04083_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

04083\04083_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

04083\04083_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 04083\04083_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04083\04083_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04083\04083_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04083\04083_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04083\04083_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

04083\Certification Statement_04083.pdf Plant certification statement

x 04083\Supporting Documentation\04083_Diagrams.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

04083\Supporting Documentation\ICR MOCoverPage.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
431.101 Objectives.

(a) The SPE is designated as the official authorized to give advance approval of an individual

deviation concerning cost principles.

(b) The SPE is designated as the official authorized to give advance approval of a class deviation

concerning cost principles after coordination with the Civilian Agency Acquisition Council.

(c) Requests for advance approval of class deviations concerning cost principles must be submitted

to the SPE through the HCA.

Parent topic: Subpart 431.1 - Applicability
470.203 Cargo preference.       An agency having responsibility under this subpart shall administer its programs, with respect to this subpart, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Transportation.    **Parent topic:** PART 470 - COMMODITY ACQUISITIONS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

WILLIAM D. BOWDEN, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

 )

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv665-WHA

 )

MISSION PETROLEUM CARRIERS, et al., )

 )

Defendants. )

ORDER

No Revised Report of Parties Planning Meeting having been filed by the parties by

January 30, 2007, as permitted by the order of the court (Doc. #18), entered on January 16, 2007,

it is hereby

ORDERED that all currently established deadlines under the Uniform Scheduling Order

shall remain in full force and effect. The only deadlines included in the Uniform Scheduling

Order which are changed are the extension of expert witness disclosures to February 9, 2007 for

the Plaintiff and March 9, 2007 for the Defendants. The parties are bound by all other deadlines

set out in the original order.

DONE this 1st day of February, 2007.

/s/ W. Harold Albritton 

W. HAROLD ALBRITTON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 19 Filed 02/01/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cv-00693-ID-TFM Document 33 Filed 12/29/2006 Page 1 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00693-ID-TFM Document 33 Filed 12/29/2006 Page 2 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00693-ID-TFM Document 33 Filed 12/29/2006 Page 3 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00693-ID-TFM Document 33 Filed 12/29/2006 Page 4 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00693-ID-TFM Document 33 Filed 12/29/2006 Page 5 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00693-ID-TFM Document 33 Filed 12/29/2006 Page 6 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00693-ID-TFM Document 33 Filed 12/29/2006 Page 7 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00693-ID-TFM Document 33 Filed 12/29/2006 Page 8 of 8
#### In re BRUSH’S ESTATE.

(No. 6056.)

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 19, 1914.)

Executors and Administrators (§ 87*)—Collection of Assets—Compromise of Claim—Confirmation.

Where a petition for the confirmation of a compromise by an administrator of a claim belonging to the estate did not disclose sufficient reasons for the compromise at the amount stated, the order of confirmation will be reversed.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Executors and Administrators, Cent. Dig. §§ 323, 384-392; Dec. Dig. § 87.*]

Appeal from Order of Surrogate, New York County.

From an order of the surrogate confirming an order authorizing the administrator of the estate of Jacob J. Brush, deceased, to compromise a claim, Eliza E. Brush appeals.

Reversed.

Argued before INGRAHAM, P. J., and McLAUGHLIN, SCOTT, DOWLING, and HOTCHKISS, JJ.

James E. Kelly, of New York City, for appellant.

John A. Bolles, of New York City, for respondent.

*

For other cases see same topic *&*§ number in Dec. *&*Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep’r Indexes

PER CURIAM.

The order appealed from should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the application denied, upon the ground that the moving petition fails to disclose sufficient reasons for the compromise of the claim against Lillie M. Taylor at the amount stated, without prejudice to a renewal of the application upon showing 'sufficient facts.