alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
La manera más importante para manternese

sano es participar activamente en el cuidado de

su propia salud. Esta información le ayudará

cuando hable con su médico. 

Es importante entender como puede influir sus

medicamentos en su tratamiento con el fin de

poder recibir el máximo beneficio de ellos. 

Cuando su médico le receta una medicina,

pregúntele a él o al farmaceútico lo siguiente:

• ¿Cuál es el nombre de la medicina? ¿Cuál es

el efecto? 

• ¿Será possible sustituir el medicamento de

marca por uno de marca genérica menos

costoso? ¿Tendrá el mismo efecto?

• ¿Cuál es la dosis de la medicina? ¿Hay

alimentos, bebidas, otras medicinas, o

actividades que debo evitar al tomar esta

medicina? 

• ¿Cuáles son los posibles efectos secundarios

de este medicamento? ¿Qué debo hacer al

sentir los efectos secundarios? 

• ¿Cuántas veces puedo renovar esta

prescripción? 

• ¿Qué debo hacer si me salto una dosis? 

• ¿Qué debo hacer si accidentalmente me tomo

más de la dosis recomendada?

• ¿Hay información escrita que me puedo

llevar? (La mayoría de las farmacias tienen

hojas de información que usted puede usar

como referencia en la comodidad de su casa.)

Cuando usted recoja su medicina en la

farmacia, chequee para estar seguro que la

medicina es la que fue recetada por su doctor. 

Cuando su doctor le receta un medicamento por

primera vez, asegúrese de contarle lo siguiente:

(over)

Consejos para cuando

necesite una receta médica
• Los nombres de todas las medicinas que está

tomando actualmente, inclusive los

medicamentos de y sin recetas médicas. Es

importante que su doctor sepa esta

información para recetarle la medicina que le

hará el mayor beneficio. 

• Cualquiera duda que tenga acerca de como

tomar su medicamento. 

• Si es alérgico a cualquier medicamento o ha

tenido efectos secundarios molestosos de

algún medicamento de receta.

Durante su tratamiento, usted debe hacer una

cita de seguimiento con su médico para poder

controlar y observar su progreso. Asegúrese de

contarle:

• Acerca de cualquier problema que tiene con

su receta médica.

• Acerca de cualquier efecto secundario que ha

tenido desde que comenzó a tomar la

medicina.

• Acerca de cualquier medicina recetada por

otro doctor o comprada en la farmacia sin

necesidad de receta médica que usted empezó

a tomar desde la su última visita al médico. 

• Como se está sintiendo desde que comenzó a

tomar el medicamento.

Recuerde que en cuanto a su salud, la calidad de

la atención médica vale mucho. 

Para más información en español sobre la

salud, llame a 1-800-358-9295 o visítenos en el

Internet a ahrq.gov/consumer/espanoix.htm. La

información es gratis.

www.ahrq.gov

AHRQ Pub. No. 02-0041c

September 2002
Exhibit 99.5




CERTIFICATION




I, Roger L. Smith, certify that:




1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Ur-Energy Inc.;




2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the issuer and have:




(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;




(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;




(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5. The issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.




Date: March 18, 2011


/s/ Roger L. Smith


Roger L. Smith


Chief Financial Officer
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and coll ateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### MAR 30 1999 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

MOSES AUGUSTUS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v. R. BANASZAK, Senior Officer, Defendant-Appellee. No. 98-3309 (District of Kansas) (D.C. No. 98-CV-3241)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before TACHA , McKAY, and MURPHY , Circuit Judges. After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materiallyassist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). T he case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.1 See Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). -2- Moses Augustus, proceeding pro se , appeals the district court’s dismissal of his Bivens -type civil rights complaint 1 on the ground the complaint was filed outside of the applicable two-year limitations peri od. In his complaint, Augustus alleged that he was beaten by the defendant prison guard at 10:20 a.m. on December 14, 1995. The district court began its an alysis by noting that the applicable limitations period was the two-year peri od set out in Kan. Stat. Ann. § 60-513(a)(4) and that Augustus had not filed his co mplaint until July 21, 1998. Because Augustus filed his claim approximately thirty-one months after the alleged beating, rather than within the two-years s et out in the statute, the district court concluded that the claim was barred. Rather than addressing the statute-of-limitations q uestion in his appellate brief, Augustus has, instead, simply changed the date of the alleged incident. Without any explanation, Augustus asserts in his ap pellate brief that the alleged beating incident took place on December 14, 1998 , rather than December 14, 1995 . This change in date is particularly startling inlight of two facts. First, Augustus repeatedly and unequivocally alleged in hi s complaint that the purported beating took place in 1995. Second, and more important, Augustus’ complaint was filed in July of 1998, approximately five month s before the newly fabricated date of the incident. In light of these facts, it is clear that Augustus’ appeal is-3-

both frivolous and malicious. Accordingly, this co urt DISMISSES this appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Thus, this app eal counts as a “prior occasion” for purposes of the three-strikes provisi on set out in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Finally, this court reminds Augustus of h is continuing obligation to pay all installments of the deferred appellate filing f ee until it is paid in full. No exception is made for dismissed appeals. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). ENTERED FOR THE COURT:
Michael R. Murphy Circuit Judge
#### § 927.3 Person.

*Person* means an individual partnership, corporation, association, legal representative, or any other business unit.
750.000 Scope of part.       Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 4207, Jan. 23, 2024.          USAID is not among the agencies named in the Act or authorized by the President to take actions under it; however, see Subpart 750.71—Extraordinary Contractual Actions to Protect Foreign Policy Interests of the United States.    **Parent topic:** PART 750—EXTRAORDINARY CONTRACTUAL ACTIONS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

TRACY HIMCHAK,

Respondent

v.

WILLIAM A. HIMCHAK,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 87 MM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 6th day of August , 2018, the “Omnibus Motions” is DENIED.
**Docket Number F AA**  **- 2014**  **- 0625**
(June 9, 1970)

#### Damon Runyon Memorial Fund for Cancer Research, Inc., Appellant, v. Service Contracting Co., Inc., Defendant-Respondent and Third-Party Plaintiff. Aquatherm Conditioning Corp. et al., Third-Party Defendants.

Judgment entered May 12, 1969, unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts, to the extent that a new trial is directed as to the first cause of action, and otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements; execution of judgment as to the counterclaim in favor of defendant is stayed, however, pending the retrial of the first cause of action, which is hereby directed in the interests of justice. Multiple errors necessitate a retrial as to the first cause of action: (a) It is the province of the court, and not the jury, to rule initially on the qualification of an expert. *(Meiselman*v. *Crown Hgts. Hosp.,*285 27. Y. 389, 398; Richardson, Evidence [8th ed.], § 388); (b) The court repeatedly circumscribed the testimony of the experts, at times refusing to permit them to testify even as to their observations; (c) A cardinal error was committed when the court rejected evidence of the work performed by and the money received by Engel & Co., on the ground there was *“*no connection with the plaintiff and defendant in the case. * * * There is no showing that the defendant in this case had any privity of contract with this witness or the party who made requisitions and received checks.” The law of course is that there need be no privity at all between the parties, when a third contractor, such as Engel, is called in to rectify defects occasioned by the deficient work done by the contractor first engaged to do the work. (See *Crouch*v. *Gutmamn,*134 27. Y. 45; *Bellizzi*v. *Humtley Hstates,*3 27 Y 2d 112.) Judgment on the counterclaim in favor of the defendant is permitted to stand because no probative evidence was offered to contradict either the alleged contractual understanding or the mathematical formula by which the sum was derived. We have stayed execution of this judgment to provide for the possibility plaintiff, on the retrial of its first cause of action, may set off in part or equal the amount of this judgment presently in *905favor of defendant. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Eager, McGivern, Markewich and Nunez, JJ.
Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 12 Filed 04/13/2006 Page 1 of 7 Case 2:05-cv-06074-JCJ Document 12 Filed 04/13/2006 Page 1 of 7

Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 12 Filed 04/13/2006 Page 2 of 7 Case 2:05-cv-06074-JCJ Document 12 Filed 04/13/2006 Page 2 of 7

Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 12 Filed 04/13/2006 Page 3 of 7 Case 2:05-cv-06074-JCJ Document 12 Filed 04/13/2006 Page 3 of 7

Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 12 Filed 04/13/2006 Page 4 of 7 Case 2:05-cv-06074-JCJ Document 12 Filed 04/13/2006 Page 4 of 7

Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 12 Filed 04/13/2006 Page 5 of 7 Case 2:05-cv-06074-JCJ Document 12 Filed 04/13/2006 Page 5 of 7

Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 12 Filed 04/13/2006 Page 6 of 7 Case 2:05-cv-06074-JCJ Document 12 Filed 04/13/2006 Page 6 of 7

Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 12 Filed 04/13/2006 Page 7 of 7 Case 2:05-cv-06074-JCJ Document 12 Filed 04/13/2006 Page 7 of 7
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

December 26, 2012

s1217

Order 

December 26, 2012

146039

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146039

COA: 311281

Kent CC: 11-010690-FH;

12-001120-FH

GERMAINE NELSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 6, 2012 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
§ 956.50 Research and development. ( a ) The committee, with the approval of the Secretary, may establish or provide for the establishment of production research, marketing research and development, and marketing promotion projects, including paid advertising, designed to assist, improve, or promote the marketing, distribution, consumption, or efficient production of Walla Walla Sweet Onions. Any such project for the promotion and advertising of Walla Walla Sweet Onions may utilize an identifying mark, including but not limited to registered trademarks and logos, which shall be made available for use by all handlers in accordance with such terms and conditions as the committee, with the approval of the Secretary, may prescribe. The committee may register such logos with the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. The expense of such projects shall be paid from funds collected pursuant to §§ 956.42 and 956.45.
( b ) In recommending projects pursuant to this section, the committee shall give consideration to the following: ( 1 ) The expected supply of Walla Walla Sweet Onions in relation to market requirements;
( 2 ) The supply situation among competing onion areas and communities;
( 3 ) The anticipated benefits from such projects in relation to their costs;
( 4 ) The need for marketing research with respect to any market development activity; and
( 5 ) Other relevant factors.
( c ) If the committee concludes that a program of research and development should be undertaken, or continued, in any fiscal period, it shall submit the following for the approval of the Secretary: ( 1 ) Its recommendations as to the funds to be obtained pursuant to §§ 956.42 and 956.45;
( 2 ) Its recommendations as to any research projects; and
( 3 ) Its recommendations as to promotion activity and paid advertising.
( d ) Upon conclusion of each activity, but at least annually, the committee shall summarize and report the results of such activity to the Secretary.
( e ) All marketing promotion activity engaged in by the committee, including paid advertising, shall be subject to the following terms and conditions: ( 1 ) No marketing promotion, including paid advertising, shall refer to any private brand, private trademark, or private trade name;
( 2 ) No promotion or advertising shall disparage the quality, use, value, or sale of like or any other agricultural commodity or product, and no false or unwarranted claims shall be made in connection with the product; and
( 3 ) No promotion or advertising shall be undertaken without reason to believe that returns to producers will be improved by such activity.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications

  I, Kristen Ann Cronin, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A and all reports on Form 10-D
     required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report
     on Form 10-K/A of ACE Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan Trust, Series
     2006-ASAP5 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
     light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

  4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
     servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
     conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
     this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
     in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
     their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects;
     and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
     criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
     reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
     asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
     accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
     13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
     except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
     of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
     this report on Form 10-K/A.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
     information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
     Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC as Servicer.

     Dated: May 27, 2008


     /s/ Kristen Ann Cronin
     Signature

     Vice President
     (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master servicer)
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 52 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 52 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 2 of 2
# 3405.502 Authority.

Authority to approve publication of paid advertisements in newspapers is delegated to the HCA.     

**Parent topic:**Subpart 3405.5—Paid Advertisements
OFFICE OFTHE ATTORNEY GENERALOFTEXAS 

AUSTIN 

u c. MAW" 

omn e.*- 

I @ , 

i 

\ 

of your letter of 

plnlon al0 follow- 

-t of tale 

Oxa8# has about 

one glalon tin earl@, 

The Frlacn ?3pItenL 

aOe heed to exchange 

prooeseed for t&me ofme. 

ontrol baye the authority 

of Control is given a very g0nercbl 

ous (Lopartments, boards, institutions 

offices of the state with respect to fisea1 

ati econanic nattexw. Se0 drt. 603 Rev. C&y. Stat. 

The Board fe especiallg mt&orizsCt *to make eontracts aft& t&e State Prison Board for the gxrchaee of 

supplios,r * * 3.IlclWng; food., * * 0 and all otiep supi>llOS 01' clfricultural 0X' mUUifaCt~sd pSOduOti, * * l Per 

~60 af tha"Statt2 io any of Its dcpnrtliumts, Con~~aeions, 

b~arils, 0ffioos or ~lesmosynary or odwatlonal institutioas.~ 

Rey.CI~.St~t.,Ve~Onte CO&.,&t. 834 l/a. 

684 
685 

Honorable Tm DollfWrg - Page S 

Article 666 of the Ravfmed Civil Btatutes declaros I 

~Tho State Iloard of Control ahall haye 

charge and control,of sll prbllo buildings, 

grounds and property of the atate, and is 

the ouotodian of all publiO persOnal prOperty, 

erdf is ahaqed with the reeponsibillt~ to 

properly oar0 for and potfmt au* pqer 

from damage, +% instrueion or improper uerge. 

In sur opi!dou BO. o-z376 we aoIlotrllea this 

statute, 'to suthorise the Board of Control to oooept 

from any State deprtmsat Or inst~tUti6n Under its 00~ 

trol supplicse and equ%pImnt no louger usable or lsbeded 

for uere by such departwant or inetitutfon, and to plsse 

the 6wut3 In the hamU of any other department or in&itution haying need of the saw (at least temporarily, 

If not permanently) vhere such axahanga is oltually 

satiefaotory to the two departments or InstitutiOns concerned, as an act of oomemticm under the gepsral pouer 

above oonferred on the Board,* 

upon these oonalderations you are reepwtfully 

ad~ised~~tis the opbion of th&nde~tmentthatths 

mard of Goutrol do06 brve the aUtfiO&ty to 8p~OYe the 

-hang9 suggested in your 1Ilttr of in*.
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 19 Filed 10/18/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 19 Filed 10/18/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 19 Filed 10/18/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 19 Filed 10/18/2006 Page 4 of 4
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

CINCINNATI INSURANCE )

COMPANY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 3:06cv733-MHT

) 

JOSEPH DONALD PRATHER )

and LINDA PRATHER, )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the notice of withdrawal (doc. no.

18) is treated as a motion to withdraw and said motion is

granted.

DONE, this the 28th day of November, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 19 Filed 11/28/2006 Page 1 of 1