alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

EXHIBIT 35.1

                          SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
                           Long Beach Acceptance Corp.
               Long Beach Acceptance Auto Receivables Trust 2006-B

The undersigned a duly authorized officer of Long Beach Acceptance Corp. as
Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1,
2006 by and between Long Beach Acceptance Corp. and Deutsche Bank Trust Company
Americas, as Trust Collateral Agent and the Indenture dated as of September 1,
2006 by and between Long Beach Acceptance Auto Receivables Trust 2006-B and
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Indenture Trustee, does hereby certify:

1.    Long Beach Acceptance Corp. is Servicer under the Sale and Servicing
      Agreement.

2.    The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Sale and
      Servicing Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the
      Trustee.

3.    This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 4.10 of the Sale and
      Servicing Agreement and Section 3.9 of the Indenture.

4.    A review of the Servicer's activities during the twelve months ended
      December 31, 2006 and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing
      Agreement and the Indenture has been made under my supervision.

5.    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
      fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement
      and the Indenture in all material respects throughout the twelve months
      ended December 31, 2006.

LONG BEACH ACCEPTANCE AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 2006-B

By: Long Beach Acceptance Corp., as Servicer

/s/ Michael J. Pankey
--------------------------------------------
        Michael J. Pankey
        Executive Vice President and
        Chief Financial Officer

Dated: March 29, 2007
```
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION

HOWARD GLEN TOOLE, )

#C 917 683 )

)

Petitioner, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 1:06cv696-MHT

) (WO) 

JAMES McDONOUGH, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

OPINION

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254, petitioner, a state

inmate, filed this lawsuit seeking habeas relief. This

lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of

the United States Magistrate Judge that petitioner’s writ

petition be denied. Also before the court are

petitioner’s objections to the recommendation. After an

independent and de novo review of the record, the court

concludes that petitioner’s objections should be

overruled and the magistrate judge’s recommendation

adopted.

Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 44 Filed 10/30/08 Page 1 of 2
An appropriate judgment will be entered.

DONE, this the 30th day of October, 2008.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 44 Filed 10/30/08 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

EASTERN DIVISION 

CLIFFORD ALSTON, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Civil Action No.: 

 ) 3:06 CV 722 WKW-DRB 

CHRISTOPHER ASKEW, et al., ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

 COMES NOW, Christopher D. Glover with the law firm of Hollis & Wright, and 

enters his appearance as counsel of record for the Plaintiff. 

 All future correspondence, pleadings, notices and/or inquiries should be directed to 

the address and telephone number listed below. 

 

 s/Christopher D. Glover__________ 

Christopher D. Glover (GLO007) 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

OF COUNSEL: 

HOLLIS & WRIGHT, P.C. 

505 North 20th Street, Suite 1500 

Birmingham, Alabama 35203 

(205) 324-3600 

(205) 324-3636 Facsimile 

Case 3:06-cv-00722-WKW-TFM Document 6 Filed 09/26/2006 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this the 26th day of September, 2006, I have electronically 

filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will 

send notification of such filing to the following: 

Keri Donald Simms

Miller, Hamilton, Snider & Odom

505 North 20th Street, Suite 1200 

Birmingham, AL 35203 

 s/Christopher D. Glover____________

 OF COUNSEL 

2

Case 3:06-cv-00722-WKW-TFM Document 6 Filed 09/26/2006 Page 2 of 2
EX-35 (b)
(logo) AVELO
       MORTGAGE


Avelo Mortgage,

Annual Compliance Statement


Re: The Flow Servicing Agreement dated as of January 1, 2006 (the "Agreement"),
among Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company and Avelo Mortgage, LLC and GSAA Home
Equity Trust 2006-15


1. A review has been completed of Avelo Mortgage, LLC's ("Avelo") servicing
activities and its performance under the servicing agreement during the period
from February 24, 2006 through December 31, 2006. This review was completed
under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Avelo has fulfilled all of
its obligations under the agreement in all material respects, except as
described in the item below:

For a period of time in 2006, bank accounts were not reconciled in strict
compliance with Section 1122(d)(2)(vii) of Reg AB which provides as follows:

*  Reconciliations are prepared on a monthly basis for all asset-backed
   securities, related bank accounts, including custodial accounts and related
   bank clearing accounts. These reconciliations are (A) mathematically
   accurate; (B) prepared within 30 calendar days after the bank statement
   cutoff date, or such other number of days specified in the transaction
   agreements; (C) reviewed and approved by someone other than the person who
   prepared the reconciliation; and (D) contain explanations for reconciling
   items. These reconciling items are resolved within 90 calendar days of their
   original identification, or such other number of days specified in the
   transaction agreements.


The bank account reconciliations were current as of December 31, 2006, and no
issues were found or arose from the delay in reconciling the bank accounts.

I certify this information to be true and correct to the best of my ability.


/s/ James Weston Moffett
Name:  James Weston Moffett
Title: President and CEO
Date:  February 28, 2007


600 E. Las Colinas Blvd.  Suite 620  Irving, TX 75039  972.910.7000
F. 972.910.7099
Case 3:06-cv-00722-WKW-TFM Document 19 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-00722-WKW-TFM Document 19 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 2 of 2
REDWOOD RESIDENTIAL ACQUISITION CORPORATION

One Belvedere Place, Suite 300

Mill Valley, CA 94941

January 30, 2023

TO ALL PARTIES LISTED ON SCHEDULE A ATTACHED HERETO:

Re:	Annual Statement of Compliance by the Servicing Administrator; Item 1123 Certificate;

Sequoia Mortgage Trusts (“SEMT”) 2012-5, 2012-6; and

SEMT 2013-2, 2013-3, 2013-4, 2013-6, 2013-7, 2013-8

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Redwood Residential Acquisition Corporation (the “Servicing Administrator”), hereby certifies as follows for the reporting period from January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022 (the “Reporting Period”):

(A) a review of the Servicing Administrator’s activities during the Reporting Period, and its performance under the Flow Mortgage Loan Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2011, between the Servicing Administrator and Cenlar FSB, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to the Flow Mortgage Loan Servicing Agreement, dated November 3, 2011 and Amendment No.2 to the Flow Mortgage Loan Servicing Agreement, dated August 13, 2014, and as modified by the related Acknowledgement (the “Cenlar FSB Flow Servicing Agreement”) and the respective Pooling and Servicing Agreements, has been made under such officer’s supervision; and


(B) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicing Administrator has fulfilled all its obligations under the Cenlar FSB Flow Servicing Agreement and the respective Pooling and Servicing Agreements, in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.


Very truly yours,

REDWOOD RESIDENTIAL ACQUISITION CORPORATION,

Servicing Administrator

/s/ Carlene A. Graham



Name: Carlene A. Graham

Title: President



---

SCHEDULE A

Sequoia Residential Funding, Inc.

One Belvedere Place

Suite 330

Mill Valley, CA 94941

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia, MD 21045-1951

As Master Servicer for:

SEMT 2012-5, 2012-6; and

SEMT 2013-2, 2013-3, 2013-4, 2013-6, 2013-7

CitiMortgage, Inc.

4050 Regent Blvd.

Irving, TX 75063

As Master Servicer for SEMT 2013-8

Citibank, N.A.

388 Greenwich St., 14thFloor

New York, NY 10013

As Securities Administrator for:

SEMT 2012-5, 2012-6; and

SEMT 2013-2, 2013-3, 2013-4, 2013-6, 2013-7, 2013-8

Christiana Trust, a division of Wilmington Savings Fund Society FSB

500 Delaware Avenue, 11thFloor

Wilmington, DE 19801

Attention: Corporate Trust

As Trustee for:

SEMT 2012-5, 2012-6; and

SEMT 2013-2, 2013-3, 2013-4, 2013-6

Wilmington Trust, National Association

1100 North Market Street

Wilmington, DE 19890

As Trustee for SEMT 2013-7 and 2013-8

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

WILLIAM D. BOWDEN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No.: 2:06-CV-665

)

MISSION PETROLEUM CARRIERS, )

ANTONIO MARTINEZ NAVARRO )

)

Defendants. )

PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS’ DEPOSITION DISCLOSURE

COMES NOW the Plaintiff William D. Bowden and hereby files his written objections

to Defendants’ depositions which may be used at trial in this matter,

1. The deposition of the Defendants’ vocational expert Doug Miller has not been

taken at this time and is scheduled for a tentative date in May. Plaintiff hereby objects to the

introduction of Mr. Miller’s deposition and reserves the right to object to this deposition in parts

or in its entirety and/or withdraw this objection following the deposition of Mr. Miller.

2. Plaintiff reserves the right to supplement this list as allowed by law and which

may be necessary following further discovery and depositions to be taken in this matter.

Dated this the 19th day of April, 2007.

McPhillips, Shinbaum, & Gill, L.L.P.

516 S. Perry Street /s/ James G. Bodin 

P.O. Box 64 JAMES G. BODIN

Montgomery, AL 36101-0064 Attorney for the Plaintiff

PH.(334) 262-1911

FAX(334) 263-2321

Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 43 Filed 04/19/2007 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have served a copy of the foregoing on the following counsel of

record by delivery U.S. mail on this the 19th day of April, 2007.

Caroline T. Pryor, Esq.

CARR ALLISON

P. O. Box 1126

Daphne, Alabama 36526

 /s/ James G. Bodin 

 OF COUNSEL

Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 43 Filed 04/19/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### § 906.61 Personal liability.

No member or alternate of the committee or any employee or agent thereof, shall be held personally responsible, either individually or jointly with others, in any way whatsoever, to any handler or to any person for errors in judgment, mistakes, or other acts, either of commission or omission, as such member, alternate, agent, or employee, except for act of dishonesty, willful misconduct, or gross negligence.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Theodore Hunt, Appellant.

Sweeney, J.

Appeal from an order of the County Court of St. Lawrence County which denied, without a hearing, appellant’s application for a writ of error *coram, nobis.*Appellant raises substantially the same issue, based upon statements made by him at the time of his plea and sentencing which -he alleges should have put the court on notice that no crime had been committed, as was raised previously (31 A D 2d 846 and 33 A D 2d 733). Appellant further alleges that he was not represented at his sentencing and contends he did not waive his right to an attorney. Defendant’s claim is conclusively refuted by the minutes of the sentence proceeding. They clearly establish that appellant was thoroughly apprised of his rights, knew and understood what the court was talking about, had been advised by his retained counsel on the day of sentencing, and acted *“*understandingly, competently and intelligently ” when he waived his right to the aid of counsel. *(Matter of Bojinoff*v. *People,*299 N. Y. 145, 151-152; *People*v. *Bodie,*16 N Y 2d 275; *People*v. *Briggs,*28 A D 2d 1204.) Order affirmed. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Greenblott, Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur in memorandum by Sweeney, J.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3248 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3248

  To suspend temporarily the duty on right angle ground fault circuit 
                             interrupters.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 26, 2006

Mr. Frist (for Mrs. Dole) introduced the following bill; which was read 
             twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on right angle ground fault circuit 
                             interrupters.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN RIGHT ANGLE GROUND FAULT CIRCUIT INTERRUPTERS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.85.34        Right angle ground      Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           fault circuit                                                     31/2009          ''
                           interrupters of 15                                                                  .
                           amps or more
                           (provided for in
                           subheading
                           8536.30.80)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 987.44 Free and restricted percentages. ( a ) Whenever the Committee finds that the available supply of marketable dates of applicable grade and size available to supply the trade demand for free dates of any variety is likely to be excessive, and that limiting the volume of marketable dates to be handled as free dates through establishment of free and restricted percentages applicable to such variety of such dates would tend to effectuate the declared policy of the act, it shall recommend such percentages to the Secretary. If the Secretary finds, upon the basis of the Committee's recommendation and supporting data or other information available to him, that the establishment of such percentages would tend to effectuate the declared policy of the act, he shall establish such percentages. The sum of the free and restricted percentages for any crop year shall equal 100 percent.
( b ) The dates handled by any handler in accordance with the provisions hereof shall be determined to be that handler's quota fixed by the Secretary within the meaning of section 8a(5) of the act.
[27 FR 6818, July 19, 1962, as amended at 43 FR 4252, Feb. 1, 1978]
52.247-28 Contractor’s Invoices.

As prescribed in 47.207-9(c), insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts for drayage or

other term con- tracts for transportation or for transportation-related services:

Contractor’s Invoices (Apr 1984)

The Contractor shall submit itemized invoices as instructed by the agency ordering services under

this contract. The Contractor shall annotate each invoice with the contract number and other

ordering office document identification.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.247 [Reserved]
#### Empire Rayon Yarn Co., Inc., Respondent, v. City of Mount Vernon, Appellant.

-Judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated April 18, 1966, modified, on the law and the f-acts, by (1) striking out the provisions (a) adjudging plaintiff to be entitled to recover damages for flooding of the boiler room and (b) directing an assessment of damages and (2) adding a provision that the complaint is dismissed, with costs. As so modified, judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to appellant. The theory of plaintiff’s action was that flood waters had erupted from a manhole which was part of the defendant city’s storm drainage system and had entered plaintiff’s building and premises, causing injury to property. It was alleged that that system was inadequate in design, construction and maintenance. Upon a jury verdict on a trial of the issue of liability alone, the judgment adjudged plaintiff to be entitled to damages for flooding of its boiler room, but not as to its dyehouse. Plaintiff’s case was based on eyewitness and expert testimony relating to a particular manhole cover, located opposite its driveway. It developed conclusively that the two manholes opposite plaintiff’s property were part of the sanitary sewer system which had absolutely no connection with or function in the storm drainage system. The nearest *storm drain manhole*was located 55 feet south of plaintiff’s property on a downhill incline. There was no proof that it had erupted and, even if there was, it was physically impossible for the water to have travelled uphill and entered plaintiff’s property. The next nearest manhole of the *storm drain system*w-as located 153 feet north of plaintiff’s driveway, but it is uphill of the property. It is this one that plaintiff, belatedly in the trial, attempted to designate as the erupting one. This attempt failed, in our opinion, because there was no proof that this manhole had erupted and no proof that any water therefrom had found its way into plaintiff’s boiler room. Moreover, it was physically demonstrated that the manholes located at the lower elevations would have had to pop off first under normal physical laws before the higher one could have done so. There was no attempt to show that that had occurred. Plaintiff’s reliance on *Seifert*v. *City of Brooklyn*(101 N. Y. 136) is misplaced, because in that case the source of the water that had caused the damage was identified as a defective storm sewer. Here the source is not disclosed and the proffered theory rests entirely on speculation. The present ease is more like *Beck*v. *City of New York*(16 A D 2d 809, affg. 23 Misc 2d 1036), where the natural contour of the land made the surrounding properties particularly and naturally vulnerable to damage caused by surface waters. There is no proof that such was the cause of damage here, but neither is there proof that a defective storm drain system was the cause. The motion to dismiss the complaint made at the trial should have been granted. Christ, Acting P. J., Hill, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA OF

NORTHERN DIVISION

FRANK BLAIR, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-651-MEF

)

AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, )

et al., )

)

Defendants. )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the defendants' Motion to Stay Rule 26(f)'s Discovery

Conference Requirements (Doc. #11) filed on August 31, 2006, it is hereby 

ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED.

DONE this the 11th day of September, 2006.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00651-MEF-SRW Document 12 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3149 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3149

 To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-piece or 5-piece fireplace tools 
                           of iron or steel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

 Mr. Chambliss introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-piece or 5-piece fireplace tools 
                           of iron or steel.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 4-PIECE OR 5-PIECE FIREPLACE TOOLS OF IRON OR STEEL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.82.05        4-piece or 5-piece      Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           fireplace tools of                                                31/2009          ''
                           iron or steel                                                                       .
                           (provided for in
                           subheading
                           8205.51.30)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

GREGORY SCOTT, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-654-MEF

)

NORMENT SECURITY GROUP, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the Joint Motion to Extend Discovery (Doc. #15) filed on May

21, 2007, it is hereby

ORDERED that the motion is DENIED as moot in light of the Uniform Scheduling

Order entered by the court on September 28, 2006.

DONE this the 23rd day of May, 2007.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00654-MEF-WC Document 16 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Arie Hertz,  the Chief Executive  Officer of PowerRaise,  Inc. (the  "Company"),
certifies,  under the  standards  set forth and  solely for the  purposes  of 18
U.S.C.  1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to his knowledge,  the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and  information
contained  in that Form 10-K fairly  presents,  in all  material  respects,  the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: April 8, 2008                        POWERRAISE, INC.


                                           By: /s/ Arik Hertz
                                              ----------------------------------
                                           Name:  Arik Hertz
                                           Title: Chief Executive Officer
                                                  (Principal Executive Officer)


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.