alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Clinton J. Wilson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report
on Form 10-KSB of IPtimize, Inc. for the fiscal period ended December 31, 2007;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business
issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and we have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within that entity, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over
financial reporting;

5. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the small
business issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuers board of directors:

(a) all significant
deficiencies in the design or operation of the internal controls which could adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the small business issuers
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal controls.



|                    |  |  |  |                               
|------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------
|                    |  | 
|Date: June 27, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Clinton J. Wilson         
|                    |  |  |  | Clinton J. Wilson             
|                    |  |  |  | Acting Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-31282

THE LOUISIANA LAND AND EXPLORATION COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
VERSUS PENNZOIL EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

(96-CV-1779-L)

March 9, 1999 Before DAVIS, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The judgment of the district court is affirmed for essentially
the reasons provided in the district court’s Order and Reasons dated October 28, 1997.
AFFIRMED.
§ 986.58 Reapportionment and reestablishment of regions. The Council may recommend, subject to approval of the Secretary, reestablishment of regions, reapportionment of members among regions, and may revise the groups eligible for representation on the Council. In recommending any such changes, the following shall be considered: ( a ) Shifts in acreage within regions and within the production area during recent years;
( b ) The importance of new production in its relation to existing regions;
( c ) The equitable relationship between Council apportionment and regions;
( d ) Changes in industry structure and/or the percentage of crop represented by various industry entities; and
( e ) Other relevant factors.
### ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

'\ 

## )l ; I 1021 North Grand Avenue East, P.O. Box 19276, Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276. (217) 782-2829 James R. Thompson Center, 100 West Randolph, Suite 11-300, Chicago, IL 60601 • (312) 814-6026 PAT QUINN, GOVERNOR

.. , _ ...__ 217/785-4140 217/782-9143 (TDD)

- ...., ..**~,~** I September2, 2011
Ms. Cheryl A. Newton, Director Office ofthe Air and Radiation Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region V (RI8J) 77 WestJackson Boulevard Chicago, Illinois 60604-3507

# DearM~~~ illinois EPA has received comments from your staffidentifying some typographical errors in our recently submitted rule regarding YOM emissions from consumerproducts produced or soldin lllinois (35 lAC Part223). Illinois EPA concurs with the comments from your staffand commits to correctthe errors. To that end, Illinois EPAhas already proposedto amend 35 lAC Part223 to correctthe errors. As these errors do not appear inthe Illinois Pollution Control Board's final order, and only appearedupon publication inthe Illinois Register, we do not anticipate any objectionto the amendments and we fully expect this rulemaking to be completed within twelve months. I appreciate the efforts ofyour staffto review and approve the rules. Iffurther information is required or should you have any questions, please feel free to contactme at (217) 785-4140.

# s~/ Laurel L. Kroack Chief, Bureau ofAir

Rockford, 4302 N. .'vIain St., Rockford, IL 61103' (815) 987-7760 Elgin. 595 S. State, Elgin, IL 60123 • (847) 608-3131 Bureau ofland

- Peoria. 7620 N. University St., Peoria, IL 61614. (309) 693-5462 Collinsville '·2009 Mall Street, Collinsville, IL 62234. (618) 346-5120 Des Plaines' 9511 W. Harrison 5t., Des Plaines, IL 60016' (847) 294-4000 Peoria. 5415 N. University St., Peoria, IL 61614 • (309) 693·5463 Champaign' 2125 S. First 5t., Champaign,lL 61820' (217) 278-5800 Marion. 2309 W. Main 5t., Suite 116, Marion, IL 629S9' (618) 993-7200 Printed on Recycled Papcl
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 1-2 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 1 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 1-2 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 2 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 1-2 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 3 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 1-2 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 4 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 1-2 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 5 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 1-2 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 6 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 1-2 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 7 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 1-2 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 8 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 1-2 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 9 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 1-2 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 10 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 1-2 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 11 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 1-2 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 12 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 1-2 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 13 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 1-2 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 14 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 1-2 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 15 of 15
#### § 906.2 Act.

*Act* means Public Act No. 10, 73d Congress, as amended and as re-enacted and amended by the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (sections 1-19, 48 Stat. 31, as amended; 7 U.S.C. 601-674).
Subpart 1318.2 - Emergency Acquisition Flexibilities    **Parent topic:** PART 1318 - EMERGENCY ACQUISITIONS1318.201 Contingency operation.       The designee authorized to serve as the Head of the Agency under FAR 18.201(b) and (c) is set forth in CAM 1301.70.1318.202 Defense or recovery from certain attacks.       The designee authorized to serve as the Head of the Agency under FAR 18.202(a), (b) and (c) is set forth in CAM 1301.70.1318.270 Emergency acquisition flexibilities.       (a) *Authorizing emergency acquisition flexibilities.* The process for authorizing the use of emergency procurement flexibilities within the Department of Commerce may vary depending on the nature and type of the emergency situation. However, generally, if a Senior Bureau Procurement Official (BPO) determines that emergency acquisition flexibilities are required to meet contracting needs during an emergency situation, the BPO must obtain the Senior Procurement Executive's concurrence. In the event that increased warrant authority is needed, the BPO should contact the Senior Procurement Executive.          (b) *Continuity of Operations Plan.* Each Contracting Activity shall have an updated Continuity of Operations Plan, in place designating emergency personnel with warrant levels.          (c) *Management controls.* Senior BPOs must take affirmative steps to ensure that emergency flexibilities are used solely for requirements that have a clear and direct relationship to the emergency situation, and that appropriate management controls are established and maintained to support the use of the increased thresholds. The Office of Acquisition Management will conduct periodic reviews of transactions made pursuant to the expanded authorities to evaluate whether the transactions:          (1) Were in support of the emergency situation;          (2) Were made by an authorized individual;          (3) Were appropriately documented; and          (4) Provided the maximum practicable opportunity for small business participation.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

**********

MAY’S DISTRIBUTING *

CO. INC., * CIVIL ACTION

PLAINTIFF, * NO. 2:06-CV-702

*

VS. *

* JUDGE FULLER

TOTAL CONTAINMENT, *

INC., ET AL, *

DEFENDANTS * JURY TRIAL

* REQUESTED

**********

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OF DAYCO PRODUCTS, L.L.C., 

MARK IV INDUSTRIES, INC., MARK IV INDUSTRIES, LTD.,

AND MIV HOLDINGS., S.A.

Pursuant to Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendants Dayco 

Products, L.L.C., Dayco Products, Inc., Mark IV Industries, Inc., Mark IV Industries Ltd. 

and MIV Holdings, S.A. (collectively “Dayco”) submit the following statement. Dayco 

Products, L.L.C. is a Delaware limited liability company that is a wholly owned subsidiary 

of Mark IV Industries, Ltd. Mark IV Industries, Ltd. is a Delaware corporation that is a 

wholly owned subsidiary of MIV Holdings, S.A., a Luxemborg Company. Dayco, Mark 

IV Industries and MIV Holdings are not publicly held companies. 

Respectfully submitted,

/s Ann Koppel

JAMES E. BLAZEK (LA 3154)

RICHARD B. EASON (LA 5248)

ANN R. KOPPEL (LA 27252)

Adams and Reese LLP

4500 One Shell Square

New Orleans, LA 70139

Telephone: (504) 581-3234

Facsimile: (504) 566-0210

jim.blazek@arlaw.com

ann.koppel@arlaw.com

Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 80 Filed 04/25/2007 Page 1 of 2
Attorneys for Defendants, Dayco Products, LLC, 

and Mark IV Industries, Ltd.

OF COUNSEL:

BRIAN MOSHOLDER (MOS-018)

Carpenter, Ingram & Mosholder, LLPO

4121 Carmichael Road, Suite 303

Montgomery, AL 36106

Telephone: (334) 213-5600

bmosholder@carpenterfirm.com

MYRON PENN

Penn & Seaborn, LLC

P. O. Box 688

Clayton, AL 36106

Telephone: (3334) 738-4486

myronpenn28@hotmail.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of Court by 

using the CM/ECF system, which will send a notice of electronic filing to the parties and 

counsel who are filing users, and that service was accomplished on any counsel who is not 

a filing user by United States Mail on April 25, 2007.

/s Ann Koppel

Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 80 Filed 04/25/2007 Page 2 of 2
52.250-2 SAFETY Act Coverage Not Applicable.       As prescribed in 50.206(a), insert the following provision:          SAFETY Act Coverage Not Applicable (Feb 2009)          The Government has determined that for purposes of this solicitation the product(s) or service(s) being acquired by this action are neither presumptively nor actually entitled to a pre-determination that the products or services are qualified anti-terrorism technologies as that term is defined by the Support Anti-terrorism by Fostering Effective Technologies Act of 2002 (SAFETY Act), 6 U.S.C. 441-444. This determination does not prevent sellers of technologies from applying for SAFETY Act protections in other contexts. Proposals in which either acceptance or pricing is made contingent upon SAFETY Act designation as a qualified anti-terrorism technology or SAFETY Act certification as an approved product for homeland security of the proposed product or service will not be considered for award. See Federal Acquisition Regulation subpart  50.2.          (End of provision)    **Parent topic:** 52.250 [Reserved]
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2852 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on allyl isosulfocyanate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 18, 2006 

Mr. DEMINT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on allyl 

isosulfocyanate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF EXISTING DUTY SUSPENSION 

4 ON ALLYL ISOSULFOCYANATE. 

5 (a) EXISTING DUTY SUSPENSION.—Heading 

6 9902.01.41 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

7 United States (relating to allyl isosulfocyanate) is amend8 ed by striking the date in the effective period column and 

9 inserting ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

11 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 2852 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

FRANK BLAIR, an individual, § 

 § 

 Plaintiff, § 

 § 

v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-651-MEF 

AETNA LIFE INS COMPANY, § 

AMERICOLD LOGISTICS, LLC, § 

DAWN SANFORD, et al. § 

 Defendants. § 

CONFLICT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

 COMES NOW FRANK BLAIR, a plaintiff in the above-captioned matter, and in accordance 

with the order of this Court, making the following disclosure concerning parent companies, 

subsidiaries, partners, limited liability entity members and managers, trustees (but not trust 

beneficiaries), affiliates, or similar entities reportable under the provision of the Middle District of 

Alabama’s General Order No. 3047: 

 This party is an individual. 

 Respectfully submitted: 

 

 /S/ Ralph Bohanan, Jr. 

 RALPH BOHANAN, JR. 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

 Bar Number: ASB-3857-B41R 

OF COUNSEL: 

BOHANAN & KNIGHT, P.C. 

One Perimeter Park South 

Suite 318 North 

Birmingham, Alabama 35243 

Telephone: (205) 977-2200 

Facsimile: (205) 977-2555 

ralphb@bohananknight.com 

Case 2:06-cv-00651-MEF-SRW Document 19 Filed 12/04/2007 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I do hereby certify that on the 4th day of December, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing 

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the 

following: Amelia Driscoll at adriscoll@bradleyarant.com and James S. Christie, Jr. at 

jchristie@bradleyarant.com. 

/S/ Ralph Bohanan, Jr. 

 OF COUNSEL

2

Case 2:06-cv-00651-MEF-SRW Document 19 Filed 12/04/2007 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.28




FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


This First Amendment to Employment Agreement (this “Amendment”), dated as of January 10, 2017, by and between American Campus Communities, Inc. (the “Company”) and Jennifer Beese (“Executive”).
WHEREAS, the Company and Executive have entered into an employment agreement dated as of October 16, 2013 (the “Employment Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement as set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and Executive agree as follows:
1.Position, Duties and Responsibilities.  Section 3(a) of the Employment Agreement is amended to delete “Executive Vice President-Operations and Marketing” and replace it with “Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer.”  It is currently contemplated that Executive will report to the President of the Company.


2.Capitalized Terms. Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Employment Agreement.


3.Ratification.  Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Amendment, the Employment Agreement is hereby ratified and confirmed and shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.


4.Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed in identical counterparts, which when taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument.  A counterpart transmitted by facsimile shall be deemed an original for all purposes.




















IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.
AMERICAN CAMPUS COMMUNITIES, INC.






By:    /s/ William C. Bayless, Jr.                
William C. Bayless, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer






/s/ Jennifer Beese                        
Jennifer Beese
#### § 915.1 Secretary.

*Secretary* means the Secretary of Agriculture of the United States or any officer or employee of the United States Department of Agriculture who is, or may hereafter be, authorized to exercise the powers and perform the duties of the Secretary of Agriculture of the United States.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

 _______________________________

ARTHUR JAMES TIGNER, #152 184 *

Plaintiff, *

 v. * 3:06-CV-713-MHT

 

OFFICER SELLER, et al., *

Defendants. *

 _______________________________

ORDER ON MOTION

Counsel for Defendants Jay Jones, Timothy Jones, David Sellers, and Danny Tucker

has filed a Motion to Withdraw. (Doc. No. 20.) Upon consideration of the motion, and in

light of the notice of appearance filed by new counsel for the named defendants on January

4, 2007 (Doc. No. 21), it is 

ORDERED that the Motion to Withdraw (Doc. No. 20) be and is hereby GRANTED.

DONE, this 5th day of January 2007.

 /s/Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00713-MHT-SRW Document 22 Filed 01/05/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### In re AKIN’S ESTATE.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July 10, 1914.)

In the matter of Sarah Akin, deceased.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs. Order filed. See, also, 148 N. Y. Supp. 1103.
§ 989.126 Representation of the Committee. ( a ) To provide independent and small cooperative producers equitable representation throughout the production area commencing with the term of office beginning May 1, 1984, representation shall be apportioned among the three districts specified in § 989.122. Districts 1 and 2 shall each have one producer member, and District 3 shall have the remaining producer members to which independent and small cooperative producers are entitled pursuant to § 989.26(c).
( b ) Pursuant to section 989.26(d) and commencing with the term of office beginning May 1, 1994, apportionment of the independent and small cooperative marketing association handlers shall be: ( 1 ) Two members selected from and representing the four handler(s) other than major cooperative marketing association handler(s) who acquired the largest percentage of the total raisin acquisitions during the preceding crop year;
( 2 ) Three members selected from and representing the six handlers other than major cooperative marketing association handler(s) who acquired the next largest percentage of the total raisin acquisitions during the preceding crop year; and
( 3 ) The remaining member(s) selected from and representing all other handlers, including small cooperative marketing association handler(s) and all processors.
[49 FR 18730, May 2, 1984, as amended at 59 FR 27226, May 26, 1994]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

M IDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABA M A

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

August 18, 2006

 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT

To: All Counsel of Record

Re: B.B. v. Pawn City, Inc. et al. 

Civil Action No. 3:06-cv-00715-DRB

The above-styled case has been reassigned to Judge Myron H. Thompson.

Please note that the case number is now 3:06-cv-00715-MHT. 

This new case number should be used on all future correspondence and pleadings in this

action.

 

Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### CAREY v. MANHATTAN RY. CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 15, 1906.)

Action by John Carey against the Manhattan Railway Company.

No opinion. Motion granted. Order signed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          34,087
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,087
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,315,691
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,025,707
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,063,195)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,315,691
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               166,218
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                96,509
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             120,723 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (51,014)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (51,014)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (51,014)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (3)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (3)
        

</TABLE>
APPENDIX B - RESERVED Table Of Contents

Parent topic: Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation