alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 9.1 Applicability and administration. ( a ) Subparts A through C of this part specify the eligibility requirements and payment calculations for the Coronavirus Food Assistance Program (CFAP). CFAP will provide payments with respect to commodities that have been significantly impacted by the effects of the COVID-19 outbreak. CFAP is being implemented through two rounds of payments, with the first round (CFAP 1) determined as specified in subpart B of this part, and the second round (CFAP 2) determined as specified in subpart C of this part. To be eligible for CFAP payments, participants must comply with all provisions under this subpart and the relevant particular subpart for CFAP 1 or CFAP 2. Payments will be made with respect to only commodities produced in the United States; commodities other than livestock that are imported into the United States may not be used to determine any CFAP payment. For livestock, “produced in the United States” means physically located in the United States: ( 1 ) For assistance under subpart B of this part: ( i ) On January 15, 2020, and remaining in the United States until sold, for livestock sold between January 15, 2020, and April 15, 2020; or
( ii ) On the applicable date selected for livestock in inventory between April 16, 2020, and May 14, 2020; and
( 2 ) For assistance under subpart C of this part, on the applicable date selected for livestock in inventory between April 16, 2020, and August 31, 2020.
( b ) The program is administered under the general supervision and direction of the Administrator, Farm Service Agency (FSA) with the assistance of the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS).
( c ) The FSA State committee will take any action required by subparts A through C of this part that an FSA county committee has not taken. The FSA State committee will also: ( 1 ) Correct, or require an FSA county committee to correct, any action taken by such county FSA committee that is not in accordance with the regulations of subparts A through C of this part; or
( 2 ) Require an FSA county committee to withhold taking any action that is not in accordance with subparts A through C of this part.
( d ) No provision or delegation to an FSA State or county committee will preclude the FSA Administrator, the Deputy Administrator, or a designee or other such person, from determining any question arising under the CFAP, or from reversing or modifying any determination made by an FSA State or county committee.
[85 FR 30830, May 21, 2020, as amended at 85 FR 59174, Sept. 21, 2020; 85 FR 59384, Sept. 22, 2020; 86 FR 4881, Jan. 19, 2021; 88 FR 1876, Jan. 11, 2023]
#### § 983.81 Right of the Secretary.

The members of the committee (including successors or alternates) and any agent or employee appointed or employed by the committee, shall be subject to removal or suspension at the discretion of the Secretary, at any time. Each and every decision, determination, or other act of the committee shall be subject to the continuing right of the Secretary to disapprove of the same at any time, and upon such disapproval, shall be deemed null and void.

[69 FR 17850, Apr. 4, 2004. Redesignated at 74 FR 56540, Nov. 2, 2009]
# 50th Anniversary of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge 

Our public lands represent the American spirit and reflect our history, culture, and deep respect for wild and beautiful places. As we celebrate the 50th anniversary of the establishment of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, we remember that this breathtaking terrain holds great significance to our Nation. Stretching from the plains of the Arctic Sea to the soaring mountains of the Brooks Range and lush boreal forests of the Alaskan lowlands, the rugged splendor of the Arctic Refuge is among the most profoundly beautiful places in America.

Following the efforts of visionary conservationists, the Arctic National Wildlife Range was created in 1960 by President Dwight D. Eisenhower “for the purpose of preserving unique wildlife, wilderness, and recreational values.”  In 1980, under President Jimmy Carter, the area was renamed the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and expanded to further recognize and protect the stunning variety of wildlife in the area. For 50 years, the Fish and Wildlife Service of the Department of the Interior has managed the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, carefully balancing the needs of wildlife and their vital habitats.

In the decades since its establishment, the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge has continued to be one of our Nation’s most pristine and cherished areas. In the decades to come, it should remain a place where wildlife populations, from roaming herds of caribou to grizzly bears and wolf packs, continue to thrive. The 19.6 million acres that comprise the Arctic Refuge are also home to Native American tribes, including the Inupiat and Gwich’in, and the resources of the Refuge sustain these populations and protect their indigenous traditions and way of life.

Today, the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge remains distinct in the American landscape, and we must remain committed to making responsible choices and ensuring the continued conservation of these wild lands.

Our Nation’s great outdoors, whether our stunning national parks and refuges or cherished green spaces in our local communities, are truly a hallmark of our American identity. In commemorating five decades of protection and conservation of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, I encourage all Americans to recognize the beauty and diversity of all of America’s open spaces. We are all stewards and trustees of this land, and we must ensure that our treasured wilderness and other natural areas will be part of our national heritage for generations to come.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim December 6, 2010, as the 50th Anniversary of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. I call upon all Americans to observe this anniversary with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this sixth day of December, in the year of our Lord two thousand ten, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-fifth.

[FR Doc. 2010-31127

Billing code 3195-W1-P
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of IMCOR Pharmaceutical Co. (the“company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Taffy J. Williams, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of the company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the company.

 

 
| /s/ Taffy J. Williams                                            |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Taffy  J. Williams, Ph.D.  Chief Executive Officer  May 14, 2004 |

 

----
SERVED: April 27, 2015 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION~15 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

ARMAN GRIGORIAN 

DOCKET NO. FAA 2014~ 1120 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 

- .J l/ '' 

-= 1. ,'"' • -=-.. . . - . ""'\ .._ •-- I - • -• '' ,•_,' • 

The Federal Avia.tion Administration (hereinafter "FAA") filed a Complaint dated 

January 24, 2015. Arman Grigorian, (hereinafter "Grigorian") filed a Request fo.r 

Hearing dated December 22, 2014. 

The FAA avers Grigorian was served with the Complaint on January 14, 2015 at 

his address of record. The FAA further avers that on February 27. 2015, Grigorian was 

seryed with an Amended Complaint. We served our Procedural Order on February 19, 

2015. 

On AprilS, 2015, the FAA filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. 

Grigorian has failed to file an Answer to the Complaint or Amended Complaint. 

failed to file a response to our Procedural Order and failed to respond to the Agency's 

Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; 

WHEREFORE, it be and is hereby ORDERED as follows: 

I. On or before May 8, 2015, Grigorian shall file a response to this Order 

. stating why the relief requested in the FAA's Motion should not be granted; and 

2. On or before May 8, 2015, Grigorian shall answer the Complaint; and 

3. On or before May 8, 2015, Grigorian shall fully comply with our 

Procedural Orde~; and 

4. Absent full and complete responses to paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 hereinabove. 

Grigorian may be sanctioned including, but not limited to, allegations in the Complaint 

may be deemed admitted; and/or Grigorian may be precluded from introducing any 
2 

evidence at the hearing other than his own testimony; and/or Grigorian's Request for 

Hearing may be dismissed; and/or a Default Judgment may be entered against Grigorian 

in the full amount of the fine requested by the Agency in its Complaint. 

o.;p --1-- 1 /r ..:. \ "'L ::rla;r;('f(;; ~ lV 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment- Service List 

2 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

·Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WI0001 

Arman Grigorian, Respondent 

3126 Chadney Drive . 

Glendale, CA 91026 

TEL: 818-636-8844 

ONE COPY 

Zachary M. Berman, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of Regional Counsel, Eastern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

I Aviation Plaza 

Jamaic;:t, NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3258 

FAX: 718-995-5699 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-20 14-1120 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

·Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington. 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JACK D. DENTON,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 4:20-cv-425-AW-MAF

AMY HECHT, in her official capacity, et 

al., 

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT MOTION

TO DISSOLVE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

The court granted in part Denton’s request for preliminary injunctive relief. 

ECF No. 55. The order provided that “[t]he university administrator defendants are 

enjoined from continuing to enforce or give effect to the vote to remove Jack Denton 

to the extent that doing so means denying prospective payment for services as 

student senate president.” Id. at 24. 

The administrator defendants now move to dissolve the preliminary 

injunction, saying Denton has graduated, his term as student senate president is over, 

they have paid him as directed, and there is nothing left to enjoin. ECF No. 66. 

Denton disputes none of this. ECF No. 67 at 2 (“Plaintiff acknowledges that he has 

graduated from the University, that the 72nd Student Senate is adjourned, and that 

the University has tendered the payment required by this Court’s Order.”). 

Case 4:20-cv-00425-AW-MAF Document 70 Filed 02/15/21 Page 1 of 2
2

Moreover, Denton “agrees that the preliminary injunction has no effect on the 

University.” Id.

As the affected parties all agree, the preliminary injunction is no longer 

effective. It applied only to the end of the then-current senate president term, which 

has since ended. There is thus no effective injunction to dissolve or modify. 

The motion (ECF No. 66) is DENIED as moot. 

SO ORDERED on February 15, 2021. 

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00425-AW-MAF Document 70 Filed 02/15/21 Page 2 of 2
#### § 97.150 Right to be represented.

An applicant may actively advance an application or may be represented by an attorney or agent authorized in writing.
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                                                                                                   |                                |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                   |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                   | /s/ Jack              DeFranco |
|   | Jack                DeFrancoChief                Operating Officer(Principal                Executive and Financial Officer) Date:                August 18, 2005 |

----
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
132142 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 132142 COA: 268032 Muskegon CC: 90-031839-FC WILLIAM DONNELL SAIN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the A ugust 2, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

p1120 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2006

Clerk
Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 15 Filed 08/31/2006 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 15 Filed 08/31/2006 Page 2 of 6
Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 15 Filed 08/31/2006 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 15 Filed 08/31/2006 Page 4 of 6
Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 15 Filed 08/31/2006 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 15 Filed 08/31/2006 Page 6 of 6
###### Editorial Note on Part 762

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 762 appear at 72 FR 63297, Nov. 8, 2007.

#### §§ 762.151-762.158 [Reserved]
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2741 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Solvent Blue 104. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 4, 2006 

Mr. REED (for himself and Mr. CHAFEE) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Solvent Blue 

104. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SOLVENT BLUE 104. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.32.72 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Solvent Blue 104) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 2741 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 2044** 

In R e: PETER PAUL MITRANO, Debtor
.

-------------------------- P ETER PAUL MITRANO, Debtor

– Appellant,

v. RJM ACQUISITIONS LLC; ECAST SETTLEMENT CORPORATION; PRA RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT, LLC; FAIRFAX COUNTY; ASSET ACCEPTANCE LLC; AMERICAN EXPRESS CENTURION BANK; DENOVUS CORPORATION LTD; VIRGINIA KELLY , Creditors

– Appellees, and ROBERT OGDEN TYLER; W. CLARKSON MCDOW, JR.,
Trustees

- Appellees
.

Appeal from th e United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. Leonie M. Brinkema , District Judge. ( 1:12

- cv - 00122

- LMB

- IDD ; 11

- 14531

- RGM )

Submitted : October 15, 2012 Decided: October 18, 2012

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges.2 Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Peter Paul Mitrano, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy F. Loftus, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Fairfax, Virginia; Linda D. Regenhardt, BAILEYGARY, PC, Vienna, Virginia; Derek K. Prosser, TYLER, BARTL, RA MSDELL & COUNTS, PLC, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Peter Paul Mitrano appeals the district court ’ s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing without preju dice his objections to proofs of claim filed by numerous creditors in his bankruptcy case. The district court also rejected Mitrano’s challenge to the transfer of venue from the Southern District of West Virginia to the Eastern District of Virginia, and w arned Mitrano that further frivolous appeals to that court, including reargument of his challenge to the venue transfer order , will be subject to sanctions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mitrano v. RJM Acquisitions LLC , No. 1:12

- cv - 00122

- LMB

- IDD (E.D. Va. July 2 4 , 2012). We decline to address Mitrano’s challenge to the validity of his conviction entered in the District Court for the District of New Hampshire . We deny Mitrano’s motions to expedite and for a stay pending appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AF FIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                         781,785
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      26,185,739
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,095,327
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,280,194
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          854,687
<BONDS>                                      6,134,836
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,290,671
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,280,194
<SALES>                                      1,919,104
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,942,569
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,022,055
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               670,423
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             238,701
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,390
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,390
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,390
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.12
        

</TABLE>