alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Rose McDonald, Petitioner, v. Department of Mental Hygiene of the State of New York et al., Respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR to review a determination of respondent Barahal dismissing petitioner as an employee of the Pilgrim State Hospital. Determination annulled, on the law, with costs, and matter remitted to respondent the Department of Mental Hygiene for a new hearing on the charges preferred against petitioner and for a determination *de novo,*in accordance with the views herein set forth. Although we are of the opinion that the record does not reflect *998such bias or prejudice on the part of the hearing officer as to render the hearing vulnerable in that respect, we nevertheless note that (a) he had personal knowledge of and participated' in discussions with petitioner and others with respect to at least two of the incidents which precipitated the charges; (b) he was requested to and did testify with respect thereto as a witness at the hearing in which he functioned as trier of the facts; (c) counsel for petitioner at the outset apprised the hearing officer of the possibility that he would be called upon to testify as a witness; (d) he was requested at the outset to disqualify himself and designate someone else to act in his place and stead; (e) this position was consistently maintained throughout the proceedings by counsel for petitioner; and (f) other designees were available to function in the capacity of hearing officer which, in our opinion, was the kind of quasi-judicial capacity, in a proceeding not bound by formal rules of evidence, in which they could have adequately functioned despite the lack of experience attributed to them by the hearing officer. Under the circumstances, we conclude that petitioner was not afforded the kind of hearing to which she is entitled in the interests of justice, to wit: a hearing that is more than a formality, that is fair in all respects, to the exclusion of knowledge possessed by the trier of the facts, and at which the trier of the facts is not required to and does not testify as a witness *(Matter of Waters*v. *McGinnis,*29 A D' 2d 969; *Matter of Cross*v. *Pearsall,*29 A D 2d 553). Christ, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
Subpart 445.6 [Reserved]

Parent topic: PART 445 - GOVERNMENT PROPERTY
#### § 986.25 Inspection Service.

*Inspection service* means the Federal-State Inspection Service or any other inspection service authorized by the Secretary.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Exhibit 27
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-01-2000
<CASH>                                             392
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,743
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,671
<INVENTORY>                                    105,418
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               173,387
<PP&E>                                         299,270
<DEPRECIATION>                                 196,461
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 285,056
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           83,414
<BONDS>                                         36,770
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        67,259
<OTHER-SE>                                      77,166
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   285,056
<SALES>                                        199,182
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               199,182
<CGS>                                          182,588
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  182,588
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,555
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,169
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,984)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,014)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,970)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,970)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.30)


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Michael Williams, Appellant, v. Daniel McMann, as Warden of Auburn Prison, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Two separate indictments accused relator of murder 1st degree. On March 11, 1964 he entered pleas of guilty to reduced charges of murder 2d degree. Before accepting the pleas the court said :“You understand, sir, that the only promise that is being made to you is that you will only be sentenced in one case and not in both cases?”. *728Relator answered, *“*Yes, Sir.” On May 27 he was sentenced on both charges to a term of not less than 20 years to a maximum of life at Elmira Reception Center, to run concurrently. He now seeks to set aside the convictions upon the ground that his pleas were involuntarily induced and obtained as a result of *“*fraud and deceit by the court.” In a habeas corpus proceeding brought in 1966 the sentences were held to be legal. We affirmed *(People ex rel. Williams*v. *La Vallee,*26 A D 2d 911). *Coram nobis*and not habeas corpus is the proper remedy to test the allegations set forth in the petition. (Appeal from judgment of Cayuga County Court, dismissing writ of habeas corpus.) Present— Del Veechio, J. P., Marsh, Gabrielli, Bastow and Henry, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 (the Report) of The Peoples BancTrust Company,
Inc. (the Company), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby each certify that to the best of our knowledge:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered
in the Report.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|/s/    Elam P. Holley,
Jr.                                                 
|                                                                           
|Elam P. Holley, Jr. President and Chief
Executive Officer                  
|                                                                           
|                                                                           
|/s/    Andrew C. Bearden,
Jr.                                              
|                                                                           
|Andrew C. Bearden, Jr. Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer
|                                                                           
|                                                                           
|November 12, 2003                                                          
|(Date)                                                                     



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The information furnished herein shall not be
deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.



25
§ 923.53 Modification, suspension, or termination of regulations. ( a ) In the event the committee at any time finds that, by reason of changed conditions, any regulations issued pursuant to § 923.52 should be modified, suspended, or terminated, it shall so recommend to the Secretary.
( b ) Whenever the Secretary finds, from the recommendations and information submitted by the committee or from other available information, that a regulation should be modified, suspended, or terminated with respect to any or all shipments of cherries in order to effectuate the declared policy of the act, he shall modify, suspend, or terminate such regulation. On the same basis and in like manner the Secretary may terminate any such modification or suspension. If the Secretary finds that a regulation obstructs or does not tend to effectuate the declared policy of the act, he shall suspend or terminate such regulation. On the same basis and in like manner the Secretary may terminate any such suspension.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3352 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3352

           To suspend temporarily the duty on Naphthol AS-KB.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 5, 2006

  Mr. Kennedy introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To suspend temporarily the duty on Naphthol AS-KB.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NAPHTHOL AS-KB.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.31.17        5-Chloro-3-Hydroxy-2-   Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           Methyl-2-                                                         31/2009          ''
                           Naphthanilide (CAS                                                                  .
                           No. 135-63-7)
                           (provided for in
                           subheading
                           2924.29.36)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Walter Francis Warren, Appellant.

Order of the County Court, Dutchess County, dated September 12, 1967, affirmed. No opinion. The notice of appeal, dated August 4, 1967, erroneously refers to the date of the order as July 24, 1967, which was the date of the decision. However, we have treated the notice of appeal as valid (Code Crim. Pro., § 524-c). Beldock, P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Credit Union Administration

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board, Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Mary Rupp,

Board Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-3131 Filed 2-16-10; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE P
#### Keith Haywood, Appellant, v Curtis Drown, Respondent. Keith Haywood, Appellant, v Pat Smith et al., Respondents.

(Action No. 1.)

(Action No. 2.)

Submitted September 4, 2007;

decided September 6, 2007

Reported below, 35 AD3d 1290, 1291.

Motion by Prisoners’ Legal Services et al. for leave to appear amici curiae on the appeal herein granted only to the extent that the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and 24 copies filed within seven days.
Subpart 614.2—Solicitation of Bids

Source: 64 FR 43623, Aug. 11, 1999, unless otherwise noted.

Parent topic: PART 614—SEALED BIDDING

614.201 Preparation of Invitation for Bids (IFB).

614.201-70 Use of English language.

Use of English language solicitations and contracts is mandatory unless a deviation has been

approved by the Procurement Executive in accordance with 601.470. If any part of a contract is not

written in the English language, the contracting officer shall attach an accurate English language

translation of such part to the original and each copy of the contract, unless the contracting officer

determines such action is infeasible.
#### In the Matter of Toucans, LLC, Appellant, v New York State Liquor Authority, Respondent.

Submitted April 23, 2007;

decided July 2, 2007

Reported below, 37 AD3d 1052.

Motion by Empire State Restaurant & Tavern Association for *862leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the motion for leave to appeal herein granted and the brief is accepted as filed.
Subpart 970.01 - Management and Operating Contract Regulatory System    **Parent topic:** PART 970 - DOE MANAGEMENT AND OPERATING CONTRACTS970.0100 Scope of part.       This part provides Departmental policies, procedures, provisions, and clauses that implement and supplement the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) (Chapter 1 of Title 48 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)) and other parts of the Department of Energy Acquisition Regulation (DEAR) (Chapter 9 of Title 48 CFR) for the award and administration of the Department's management and operating contracts, as defined at 48 CFR subpart 17.6. The FAR and other parts of the DEAR apply to management and operating contracts. See 970.5200 for guidance regarding which provisions and clauses (from FAR, part 970, or other parts of the DEAR) to include in management and operating contracts.970.0103 Publication and codification.       (a) *Organization of Part 970.*          (1)  			To the extent possible, the titles and text of the subparts, sections, and subsections of this part are numbered to correspond with related material that is contained in the FAR.          (2) The number to the left of the decimal point represents the DEAR part number (i.e., 970). The numbers to the right of the decimal point and to the left of the dash represent, in order, the DEAR subpart (first two digits), and the DEAR section number (second two digits). The numbers to the right of the dash represent the DEAR subsection. A second dash may follow the DEAR subsection number. As applicable, numbers to the right of the second dash represent subordinate subsections.          (3) To the extent practicable, the subpart number corresponds with the FAR part which contains related coverage, and the section number corresponds with the FAR subpart which contains related coverage (e.g., the coverage contained in 970.0309 corresponds with material contained in 48 CFR subpart 3.9).          (4) Where the FAR does not contain related coverage on a particular subject, the DEAR section number will be numbered using numbers of 70 and up (e.g., 970.0370).          (b) *Special Note Regarding Clause Numbering.* The section number for clauses prescribed in part 970 are numbered to correspond with the subpart in which the clause is prescribed (e.g., 970.5203-1 is prescribed for use at subpart 970.03).
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 35 Filed 04/19/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 35 Filed 04/19/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 35 Filed 04/19/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 35 Filed 04/19/2007 Page 4 of 4
§ 930.10 Handle. *Handle* means the process to brine, can, concentrate, freeze, dehydrate, pit, press or puree cherries, or in any other way convert cherries commercially into a processed product, or divert cherries pursuant to § 930.59, or to otherwise place cherries into the current of commerce within the production area or from the area to points outside thereof: *Provided,* That the term handle shall not include: ( a ) The brining, canning, concentrating, freezing, dehydration, pitting, pressing or the converting, in any other way, of cherries into a processed product for home use and not for resale.
( b ) The transportation within the production area of cherries from the orchard where grown to a processing facility located within such area for preparation for market.
( c ) The delivery of such cherries to such processing facility for such preparation.
( d ) The sale or transportation of cherries by a grower to a handler of record within the production area.
( e ) The sale of cherries in the fresh market in an unpitted condition.
[61 FR 49942, Sept. 24, 1996, as amended at 77 FR 33306, June 6, 2012]
Subpart 1542.7 - Indirect Cost Rates

Parent topic: PART 1542 - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION

1542.703-2 Certificate of indirect costs.

The Head of the Contracting Activity may waive the certification requirement set forth in FAR

42.703-2.

1542.705 Final indirect cost rates.

(a) The EPA shall use the Contracting Officer determination procedure for all business units for

which it shall be required to negotiate final indirect cost rates.

(b) Contracting officers shall insert the clause at 1552.242-72, Financial Administrative Contracting

officers (FACO), in cost-reimbursement contracts when the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

is the cognizant federal agency and a FACO will be assigned.

1542.705-70 Solicitation and contract clause.

The Contracting Officer shall insert the clause in 1552.242-70, Indirect Costs, in solicitations and

contracts where indirect costs apply, unless contracting with an educational institution where there

are approved predetermined final indirect cost rates.
# Subpart 1016.5 - Indefinite-Delivery Contracts

**Parent topic:**PART 1016 - TYPES OF CONTRACTS

## 1016.505 Ordering.

(b)(8) The HCA shall designate a task and delivery order ombudsman in accordance with bureau procedures and provide a copy of the designation to the agency task and delivery order ombudsman. Bureau task and delivery order ombudsmen shall review complaints from contractors concerning task and delivery orders placed by the contracting activity and ensure they are afforded a fair opportunity to be considered, consistent with the procedures in the contract. In the absence of a designation, the Bureau advocate for competition will serve in that capacity.
# SUBCHAPTER G - CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

- PART 1042 - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT SERVICES 

- PART 1042 - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT SERVICES    - 1042.1500   [Reserved]
#### In the Matter of Sinclair Haberman et al., Appellants, v Zoning Board of Appeals of City of Long Beach et al., Respondents.

Submitted August 6, 2007;

decided September 6, 2007

Reported below, 35 AD3d 465.

Motion, insofar as it seeks to strike respondents’ appendix, denied; motion, insofar as it seeks to expand the record, granted and the record deemed expanded.
§ 989.210 Handling of varietal types of raisins acquired pursuant to a weight dockage system. ( a ) *General.* A handler may acquire as standard raisins lots of Natural (sun-dried) Seedless, Golden Seedless, Dipped Seedless, Monukka, Other Seedless, Sultana, Zante Currant, Muscat (including other raisins with seeds), and Other Seedless-Sulfured raisins under the weight dockage provisions described in §§ 989.212 and 989.213. The creditable weight of each lot of raisins acquired in this manner shall be that obtained by multiplying the net weight of the raisins in the lot by the applicable factor(s) from the appropriate dockage table(s) included in those sections.
( b ) *Assessments.* Assessments on any lot of raisins of the varietal types specified in paragraph (a) of this section acquired by a handler pursuant to a weight dockage system shall be applicable to the creditable weight of such lot.
( c ) *Identification.* Any lot of raisins of the varietal types specified in paragraph (a) of this section acquired pursuant to a weight dockage system shall be so identified by the inspection service affixing to one container on each pallet, or to each bin, in such lot, a prenumbered RAC control card (to be furnished by the Committee) which shall remain affixed to the container or bin until the raisins are processed or disposed of as natural condition raisins. The control card shall only be removed by, or under the supervision of an inspector of, the inspection service, or authorized Committee personnel.
( d ) *Application of dockage factors.* A lot of raisins acquired which may be subject to both a substandard and maturity dockage factor shall have only the highest of the two dockage factors applied to determine the creditable weight.
[53 FR 49296, Dec. 7, 1988, as amended at 67 FR 36792, May 28, 2002; 68 FR 42947, July 21, 2003; 83 FR 53973, Oct. 26, 2018]
NOT DESIGNATED

1. PU3LICATION

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA

RE: Docket Number 2022 -CA -1148

In Re: Medical Review Panel George Abrams ( D) 

19th Judicial District Court

Case #: 665084

East Baton Rouge Parish

4n Application for Rehearing filed on 06/ 01/ 2023 by Thomas Abrams

Rehearing D e- A fzzL 

Mitchell R. Theriot

fit,- Ck"r, 4 z C9/ j

Wayne Ra hutz

17

Chris Hester

Date 1UA 1 4 2023

Rodd Naquin,
2917.000 Scope of part.

This part implements polices and procedures stated in FAR part 17.

Parent topic: PART 2917 - SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS
DuPont Confidential Business Information

October 30, 2009

Appendix D

Facility Report on Product Content

Fluorotelomers

Attachment

Confidential Business Information
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

M IDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABA M A

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

September 18, 2006

NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT

Re: Owen J. Rogal, D.D.S., P.C. v. Skilstaf, Inc.

Civil Action No. #3:06-cv-00711-VPM

The above-styled case has been reassigned to Judge Myron H. Thompson.

Please note that the case number is now #3:06-cv-00711-MHT. This new case number should be

used on all future correspondence and pleadings in this action.

 

Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 20 Filed 09/18/2006 Page 1 of 1