alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

MARK MEAD,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 5:21cv12-MW/MJF 

CENTER STATE RAILROAD

SERVICES, INC.,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER APPROVING JOINT SETTLEMENT 

AND STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

The parties jointly move this Court to approve their settlement of Plaintiff’s

claims pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). ECF No. 9. 

This Court has reviewed the proposed settlement, set out in the parties’ 

motion, in accordance with Lynn’s Food Stores, Inc. v. United States, 679 F.2d 1350, 

1353 (11th Cir. 1982) and finds that it represents a fair and reasonable resolution of 

all of Plaintiff’s claims and the bona fide disputes over the FLSA provisions. This 

Court approves the settlement and dismisses the case with prejudice. 

For these reasons, 

IT IS ORDERED: 

1. The joint motion for approval of Fair Labor Standards Act settlement and 

dismissal with prejudice, ECF No. 9, is GRANTED. 

Case 5:21-cv-00012-MW-MJF Document 10 Filed 03/11/21 Page 1 of 2
2

2. The parties must comply with their settlement agreement. 

3. This Court has already, inadvertently, directed the Clerk to enter judgment 

in this case. That judgment, ECF No. 8, is vacated and the Clerk shall so 

note on the docket. 

4. All claims are voluntarily dismissed with prejudice under Federal Rule of 

Civil Procedure 41. 

5. The Clerk must enter an amended judgment stating, “The parties are 

ordered to comply with their settlement agreement. All claims in this case 

are voluntarily dismissed with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 41.” 

6. The Clerk shall close the file.

SO ORDERED on March 11, 2021.

s/Mark E. Walker ____

 Chief United States District Judge

Case 5:21-cv-00012-MW-MJF Document 10 Filed 03/11/21 Page 2 of 2
615.604 Agency points of contact.

(a)(4) The contact points for unsolicited proposals are the heads of the contracting activities.

Parent topic: Subpart 615.6—Unsolicited Proposals
#### § 966.70 Procedure.

The committee may adopt, with approval of the Secretary, the procedures pursuant to which certificates of exemption will be issued to producers or handlers.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          27,095
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             296
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     70,709
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        415,756
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,577
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 539,484
<DEPOSITS>                                     416,957
<SHORT-TERM>                                    31,711
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,290
<LONG-TERM>                                     27,645
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,565
<OTHER-SE>                                      54,316
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 539,484
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 18,425
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,084
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   374
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                20,883
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               7,637
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,110
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           11,773
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      258
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  25
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 10,163
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,837
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,903
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,903
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.84
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.10
<LOANS-NON>                                        936
<LOANS-PAST>                                       171
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   532
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    518
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,497
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      211
<RECOVERIES>                                        33
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,577
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,577
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

 _______________________________

HOWARD GLENN TOOLE, #C 917683 *

Petitioner, *

 v. * 1:06-CV-696-MHT

JAMES MCDONOUGH, et al., * 

Respondents. *

 _______________________________

ORDER ON MOTION

Upon consideration of Petitioner’s motion for extension of time, and for good cause,

it is ORDERED that

1. Petitioner’s motion (Doc. No. 14) be and is hereby GRANTED;

2. Petitioner is GRANTED an extension from September 11, 2006 to September 18,

2006to comply with the court’s August 14, 2006 order. 

Done this day 5th day of September 2006.

/s/ Vanzetta Penn McPherson

VANZETTA PENN MCPHERSON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 17 Filed 09/05/2006 Page 1 of 1
Subpart 1442.2 - Contract Administration

Services

Parent topic: PART 1442 - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT SERVICES

1442.202 Assignment of contract administration.

(a) The decision to withhold normal individual contract administration functions is delegated to one

level above the CO.

(b) The delegation of authority to issue orders under provisioning procedures in existing contracts

and under basic ordering agreements for items and services identified in the schedule must be

approved at one level above the CO.
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 2026

In re: TINDRICK ZEIGLER

,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus . ( 5:17

- hc

- 02044

- FL )

Submitted : November 19, 2019 Decided: November 21, 2019

Before WILKINSON and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Tindrick Zeigler , Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Tindrick Zeigler petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has

unduly delayed acting on his petition for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012)

.

He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act . Our review of the

district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied relief on Zeigler’s petition on

September 23, 2019. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Zeigler ’s

case, we deny the mand amus petition as moot and deny his motion to expedite . We grant

leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
PART 11 –– DESCRIBING AGENCY NEEDS

 SUBPART 11.1 – SELECTING AND DEVELOPING REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENTS

 11.101 Order of precedence for requirements documents.

 SUBPART 211.2-- USING AND MAINTAINING REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENTS

 211.274 Item identification and valuation requirements.

 211.274-6 Contract clauses.

 SUBPART 211.6 — PRIORITIES AND ALLOCATIONS

 211.602 General.

SUBPART 11.1 – SELECTING AND DEVELOPING

REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENTS

11.101 Order of precedence for requirements documents.

(S-90) Submission of Information Technology, Cyber and Telecommunications Requirements.

(1) Requirements for hardware, software, services, networks and systems (including

telecommunications) that require an acquisition package (e.g., SOW/SOO/PWS, equipment/material

list, QASP, evaluation plan) shall be submitted in accordance with the DITCO Information

Technology & Telecommunications Acquisition Package Submission & Ordering Guide website at

https://www.ditco.disa.mil/contracts/IT_instruct.asp. TSRs/TSOs and PDCs are not authorized

funding documents for procurement actions requiring acquisition packages.

(2) Requirements for individual telecommunication circuits (including integrated equipment,

installation, and maintenance), long haul telecommunications services satisfied via the Public

Switched Telephone Network (PSTN), commercial internet services, wireless telecommunication

services (e.g., cell phones, satellite communications equipment) and pre-priced telecommunication

services/equipment requirements available under existing Indefinite Delivery (ID) contract vehicles

shall be submitted to DITCO via the DISA Storefront (DSF) application at

https://disa-storefront.disa.mil/dsf/sfoverview. Telecommunication Service

Requests/Telecommunications Service Orders (TSR/TSO) with valid Product Description Codes

(PDC) are the only authorized customer requirements and funding documents for the

aforementioned telecommunications requirements.
SUBPART 211.2-- USING AND MAINTAINING

REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENTS

211.274 Item identification and valuation requirements.

211.274-6 Contract clauses.

(a)(1) DISA/PSD contracting officers shall not enter text in paragraph (c) of the clause at DFARS

252.211-7003, Item Unique Identification and Valuation, as there are no HCA exemptions and many

firms tag items regardless of dollar value. Leaving the paragraph (c) blank (e.g., do not insert "See

Schedule") accepts industries' independent IUID and tagging initiatives and supports the logistics

supply chain and serial management of equipment irrespective of dollar value.

SUBPART 211.6 — PRIORITIES AND ALLOCATIONS

211.602 General.

(S-90) The HCOs shall perform the functions of the procuring activity Defense Priorities and

Allocations System officers as prescribed in DoD 4400.1M, Defense Production Act Programs (e.g.,

handle requests for special priorities assistance).

Submit request to the PL21, Contract Policy Branch to serve as the liaison between DISA and DPC.
252.225-7003 Report of Intended Performance Outside the United States and Canada—Submission with Offer.       As prescribed in                 225.7204             (a), use the following provision:          REPORT OF INTENDED PERFORMANCE OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA—SUBMISSION WITH OFFER (OCT 2020)          (a) *Definition*. “United States,” as used in this provision, means the 50 States, the District of Columbia, and outlying areas.          (b) The offeror shall submit, with its offer, a report of intended performance outside the United States and Canada if—          (1) The offer exceeds $15 million in value; and          (2) The offeror is aware that the offeror or a first-tier subcontractor intends to perform any part of the contract outside the United States and Canada that—          (i) Exceeds $750,000 in value; and          (ii) Could be performed inside the United States or Canada.          (c) Information to be reported includes that for—          (1) Subcontracts;          (2) Purchases; and          (3) Intracompany transfers when transfers originate in a foreign location.          (d) The offeror shall submit the report using—          (1) DD Form 2139, Report of Contract Performance Outside the United States; or          (2) A computer-generated report that contains all information required by DD Form 2139.          (e) The offeror may obtain a copy of DD Form 2139 from the Contracting Officer or via the Internet at http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/infomgt/forms/formsprogram.htm.          (End of provision)    **Parent topic:** 252.225 RESERVED
#### § 959.83 Effective time.

The provisions of this subpart, or any amendment thereto, shall become effective at such time as the Secretary may declare and shall continue in force until terminated in one of the ways specified in this subpart.
Subpart 913.4 [Reserved]

Parent topic: PART 913 - SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES
###### Editorial Note on Part 982

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 61 FR 17559, Apr. 22, 1996.

#### § 982.5 Area of production.

*Area of production* means the States of Oregon and Washington.
Part 5230 - COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

ADMINISTRATION

Subpart 5230.2 - CAS PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS

5230.201 Contract requirements.

5230.201-5 Waiver.

5230.202 Disclosure requirements.

5230.202-2 Impracticability of submission.

Subpart 5230.2 - CAS PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS

5230.201 Contract requirements.

5230.201-5 Waiver.

(b) and (d) Submit waiver requests to DASN(P) at least 60 days prior to anticipated contract award

by email at usn.pentagon.asstsecnavrdadc.mbx.pabt@us.navy.mil with the subject “[Activity Name]

DFARS 230.201-5 – CAS Waiver Request.” Include the estimated date of contract award.

(e) Submit reports via DASN(P) no later than November 15 by email at

usn.pentagon.asstsecnavrdadc.mbx.pabt@us.navy.mil with the subject “[Activity Name] DFARS

230.201-5(e) – Granted CAS Waivers Report.”

5230.202 Disclosure requirements.

5230.202-2 Impracticability of submission.

Submit requests for impracticability determinations to DASN(P) at least 60 days prior to anticipated

contract award by email at usn.pentagon.asstsecnavrdadc.mbx.pabt@us.navy.mil with the subject

“[Activity Name] DFARS 230.202-2 – Impracticability Determination.” Include the estimated date of

contract award.
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 55 Filed 12/13/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 55 Filed 12/13/2007 Page 2 of 2
Editorial Note on Part 982
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 61 FR 17559, Apr. 22, 1996.

§ 982.58 Research, promotion, and market development. ( a ) *General.* The Board, with the approval of the Secretary, may establish or provide for the establishment of projects involving production research, marketing research and development, and marketing promotion, including paid advertising, designed to assist, improve, or promote the marketing, distribution, consumption, or efficient production of hazelnuts. The Board may also provide for crediting the pro rata expense assessment obligations of a handler with such portion of such handler's direct expenditures for such marketing promotion including paid advertising as may be authorized. The expenses of such projects shall be paid from funds collected pursuant to § 982.61, § 982.63, or credited pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) *Creditable expenditures.* The Board, with the approval of the Secretary, may provide for crediting all or any portion of a handler's direct expenditures for marketing promotion including paid advertising, that promotes the sale of hazelnuts, hazelnut products, or their uses. No handler shall receive credit for any allowable direct expenditures that would exceed the total of the handler's assessment obligation which is attributable to that portion of the handler's assessment designated for marketing promotion including paid advertising.
( c ) *Rules and regulations.* Before any projects involving marketing promotion, including paid advertising and the crediting of the pro rata expense assessment obligation of handlers is undertaken pursuant to this section, the Secretary, after recommendation by the Board, shall prescribe appropriate rules and regulations as are necessary to effectively administer such projects.
[51 FR 29549, Aug. 19, 1986, as amended at 61 FR 17560, Apr. 22, 1996]
§ 989.115 Independent handler, major cooperative marketing association handler, and small cooperative marketing association handler. ( a ) *Independent handler* means any handler who is not a cooperative marketing association of producers.
( b ) *Major cooperative marketing association handler* means any handler who is a cooperative marketing association of producers which acquired not less than 10 percent of the total raisin acquisitions during the crop year preceding nominations.
( c ) *Small cooperative marketing association handler* means any handler who is a cooperative marketing association of producers which acquired less than 10 percent of the total raisin acquisitions during the crop year preceding nominations.
[49 FR 18730, May 2, 1984]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

August 23, 2006

NOTICE OF CORRECTION

From: Clerk’s Office

Case Style: Ruth Williams vs. Merck & C., Inc.

Case Number: 1:06cv637-MHT

 Reference is made to document # 9 filed on 8/22/06 electronically by counsel which did not

contain his electronic signatures. 

The corrected pdf document is attached to this Notice.

Case 1:06-cv-00637-MHT-SRW Document 10 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

 

RUTH WILLIAMS, * 

 * 

 Plaintiffs, * 

 * 

v. * Civil Action No.: 1:06cv637-MHT 

 * 

MERCK & CO., INC., * 

 * 

 Defendant. * 

ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT

 COMES NOW, Defendant Merck & Co., Inc. (“Merck”), by and through its 

undersigned attorneys, and hereby answers the Amended Complaint (“Complaint”) as 

follows: 

 Defendant adopts and incorporates herein as if set out in full its Answer to 

Complaint previously filed. 

 

s/Richard B. Garrett

Richard B. Garrett 

 Bar Number: (ASB-0782-A29R) 

Mike Brock 

Bar Number: (ASB-5280-B61R) 

F. Chadwick Morriss 

Bar Number: (ASB-8504-S75F) 

RUSHTON, STAKELY, JOHNSTON 

& GARRETT, P.A. 

Post Office box 270 

Montgomery, Alabama 36101-0270 

Telephone: 334/206-3100 

Fax: 334/263-4157 

 E-mail: rbg@rsjg.com

 rcb@rsjg.com

 fcm@rsjg.com 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

Case 1:06-cv-00637-MHT-SRW Document 10-2 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that on August 22, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with 

the Clerk of the court using CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to 

the following: Tom Dutton and Elizabeth French. 

 s/Richard B.Garrett 

 OF COUNSEL 

 

Case 1:06-cv-00637-MHT-SRW Document 10-2 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 2 of 2
# L_2014074EN.01002701.xml

| 14.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 74/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 74/27

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 242/2014

of 7 March 2014

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Lammefjordskartofler (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Denmark’s application to register the name ‘Lammefjordskartofler’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Denmark’s application to register the name ‘Lammefjordskartofler’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Lammefjordskartofler’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Lammefjordskartofler’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 March 2014.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 286, 2.1.2013, p. 3.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

DENMARK

Lammefjordskartofler (PGI)

---
§ 966.85 Proceedings after termination. ( a ) Upon the termination of the provisions of this subpart the then functioning members of the committee shall continue as joint trustees for the purpose of liquidating the affairs of the committee of all the funds and property then in the possession of or under control of the committee, including claims for any funds unpaid or property not delivered at the time of such termination. Action by said trusteeship shall require the concurrence of a majority of the said trustees.
( b ) The said trustees shall continue in such capacity until discharged by the Secretary; shall, from time to time, account for all receipts and disbursements and deliver all property on hand, together with all books and records of the committee and of the trustees, to such person as the Secretary may direct; and shall, upon request of the Secretary, execute such assignments or other instruments necessary or appropriate to vest in such person full title and right to all of the funds, property and claims vested in the committee or the trustees pursuant to this subpart.
( c ) Any person to whom funds, property, or claims have been transferred or delivered by the committee or its members pursuant to this section, shall be subject to the same obligations imposed upon the members of the committee and upon the said trustees.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 APRIL 28, 2011

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 10-12374

________________________

D.C. Docket Nos. 1:09-md-02036-JLK,

1:10-cv-20820-JLK

In Re: CHECKING ACCOUNT OVERDRAFT LITIGATION

___________________________________________________

DORIS POWELL-PERRY,

Individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated,

CURNIE SANDERS,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

versus

BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

________________________

(April 28, 2011)
PRYOR and COX, Circuit Judges, and WATKINS, District Judge. *

PER CURIAM:

After oral argument in this case, the United States Supreme Court decided

AT&T Mobility LLC v. Conception, No. 09-893, 2011 WL 1561956 (April 27, 2011). 

The district court’s order denying the motion to compel arbitration is VACATED, and

this case is remanded to the district court for reconsideration in light of the Supreme

Court’s opinion.

VACATED AND REMANDED. 

1

Honorable W. Keith Watkins, United States District Judge for the Middle District of *

Alabama, sitting by designation.

 This is an unlimited remand. 1

2