alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

 ______________________________

MARVIN KURT NATION, #141 669 *

Plaintiff, *

v. * 2:06-CV-693-ID

WILLIE AMBERS, et al., *

Defendants. *

 __________________________________

ORDER

Upon consideration of the special report filed by Defendant Robbins, and for good

cause, it is 

ORDERED that on or before October 31, 2006 Defendant Robbins shall submit as

an additional exhibit and/or response in support of his affidavit submitted with his special

report those specific portions of Plaintiff's medical records (as contained in Exhibits A-1, A2, A-3, and A-4 of Doc. No. 17) which are pertinent to and which support his specific

conduct and or actions as discussed in his affidavit and which are relevant to the claims

against him (as to both time and type) as alleged in Plaintiff's complaint. 

Done, this 19th day of October 2006.

/s/ Delores R. Boyd

DELORES R. BOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00693-ID-TFM Document 20 Filed 10/19/2006 Page 1 of 1
§ 958.22 Selection. The Secretary shall select committee members and alternates from the nominee lists submitted pursuant to this part or from among other eligible persons. ( a ) Each person selected as a committee member or alternate to represent producers shall be an individual who is a producer, or an officer or employee of a producer, in the district for which selected.
( b ) Each person selected as a committee member or alternate to represent handlers shall be an individual who is a handler, or an officer or employee of a handler in the portion of the production area for which selected.
( c ) The Secretary shall select one producer member of the committee, and alternate, from each of the districts established, or reestablished, pursuant to § 958.27. The Secretary shall also select one handler member of the committee, and his alternate, from the Idaho portion of the production area and one member and his alternate from Malheur County, Oregon, and two handler members, and their respective alternates, from the production area-at-large.
( d ) Each person selected by the Secretary as a committee member or alternate shall qualify by filing a written acceptance promptly with the Secretary.
( e ) The public member shall be a resident of the production area and have no direct financial interest in the commercial production, financing, buying, packing or marketing of onions except as a consumer nor be a director, officer or employee of any firm so engaged.
[22 FR 26, Jan. 3, 1957. Redesignated at 26 FR 12751, Dec. 30, 1961, as amended at 47 FR 8000, Feb. 24, 1982]
1370.102 Pre-bid/pre-proposal conference and site visit.       Insert provision 1352.270-71, *Pre-Bid/Pre-Proposal Conference and Site Visit,* in solicitations where a pre-proposal conference will be held. The provision is optional for construction and may be modified as necessary. The contracting officer shall include or delete the paragraph regarding site visits.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1370.1 - Provisions and Clauses
120 STAT. 774 PUBLIC LAW 109–274—AUG. 17, 2006

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4811:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):

May 2, considered and passed House.

Aug. 2, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–274

109th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 215 West

Industrial Park Road in Harrison, Arkansas, as the ‘‘John Paul Hammerschmidt

Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

215 West Industrial Park Road in Harrison, Arkansas, shall be

known and designated as the ‘‘John Paul Hammerschmidt Post

Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘John Paul

Hammerschmidt Post Office Building’’.

Approved August 17, 2006.

Aug. 17, 2006

[H.R. 4811]
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION CORP., Appellant

v.

NEVRO CORP., Appellee

______________________

2021

- 1775

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2019

- 01284.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

Z.W. J ULIUS C HEN

, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & FeldLLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by P RATIK A. S HAH ; M ICHAEL P. K AHN

, New York, NY; D AVID A. C AINE , Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Palo Alto, CA; M ATTHEW W OLF , Washington, DC.

R YAN C. M ORRIS

, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by T HOMAS A NTHONY B ROUGHAN

, III ; C HING -L EE F UKUDA

, S HARON L EE , New Case: 21-1775 Document: 37 Page: 1 Filed: 03/10/2022York, NY; J ON W RIGHT , Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox, PLLC, Washington, DC.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (M OORE

, Chief Judge

, C HEN and

H UGHES

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

March 10, 2022

Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court Case: 21-1775 Document: 37 Page: 2 Filed: 03/10/2022
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 239 (Tuesday, December 14, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 77877]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31241]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals To Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or To Acquire Companies That Are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than December 28, 2010.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacqueline G. King, 
Community Affairs Officer) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 
55480-0291:
    1. Bigfork Bancshares, Inc., Bigfork, Minnesota; to engage, de 
novo, in extending credit and servicing loans, pursuant to section 
225.28(b)(1) of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 8, 
2010.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-31241 Filed 12-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Filed 3/19/20 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2020 ND 57

Royce Don Carlson, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Jill Marie Carlson, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20190187

Appeal from the District Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial 

District, the Honorable Troy J. LeFevre, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

James D. Sandsmark, Fargo, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.

Ashley C. Halvorson, Fargo, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on 

brief.
2

Carlson v. Carlson

No. 20190187

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Jill Carlson appealed from a district court judgment awarding Royce 

Carlson primary residential responsibility and decision-making authority over 

daycare/afterschool provider decisions and non-emergency medical decisions of 

the parties’ minor children. Jill Carlson argues the district court’s findings on 

best-interest factors a, b, d, e, f, h, j, k, and l under N.D.C.C. § 14-09-06.2 were 

clearly erroneous. We retained jurisdiction under N.D.R.App.P. 35(a)(3) and 

remanded with instructions that the district court make further findings on 

best-interest factor j, which considers evidence of domestic violence. Carlson v. 

Carlson, 2020 ND 36, 938 N.W.2d 413.

[¶2] The district court issued its additional findings, and found the evidence 

did not trigger a presumption of domestic violence, and if a presumption did 

apply, it was overcome by clear and convincing evidence. After reviewing the 

district court’s findings on the best-interest factors, and its additional findings 

on factor j, we conclude the district court’s finding that the evidence did not 

trigger the presumption of domestic violence is not clearly erroneous, and we 

summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). 

[¶3] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.

Gerald W. VandeWalle

Jerod E. Tufte 

Daniel J. Crothers 

Lisa Fair McEvers
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INCOME
STATEMENT AND BALANCE SHEET AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              APR-2-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                JUL-1-2000
<CASH>                                           2,826
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,853
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,151
<INVENTORY>                                     73,806
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               133,301
<PP&E>                                         309,263
<DEPRECIATION>                                 106,223
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 362,346
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           58,629
<BONDS>                                        161,368
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,397
<OTHER-SE>                                     125,589
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   362,346
<SALES>                                        104,868
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               104,868
<CGS>                                           72,508
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   72,508
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,024
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   146
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,812
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,378
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,969
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,409
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,409
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .24


</TABLE>
Case 2:06-cv-00720-WHA-SRW Document 2 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00720-WHA-SRW Document 2 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00720-WHA-SRW Document 2 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 3 of 3
(April 23, 1970)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Edward Charles O’Dell, Appellant.

Sweeney, J.

Appeal from an order of the County Court of Madison County, entered January 25, 1968, which denied, without a hearing, defendant’s application for a writ of error *coram nobis.*Appellant was convicted of the crimes of burglary, third degree, and larceny, second degree, on December 14, 1965, after a trial in which he was represented by retained counsel. On January 10, 1968. he brought the present proceeding for a writ of error *coram nobis,*seeking a new trial based on newly discovered *703evidence. It has been established that this is not a proper ground for relief by way of *coram nobis. (People*v. *Palumbo,*282 App. Div. 1059; *People*V. *Pratowski,*127 N. Y. S. 2d 263.) Appellant’s remedy was by motion for a new trial pursuant to section 465 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Neither is there any merit to appellant’s contention that the court erred in denying him an opportunity to controvert the probation report. *(People*v. *Peace,*18 N Y 2d 230; *People*v. *Cleary,*33 A D 2d 814.) Order affirmed. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur in memorandum by Sweeney, J.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

BRIAN BONNER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 3:06cv715-MHT

) 

NORINCO a/k/a CHINA NORTH )

INDUSTRIES CORP., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion for leave to amend

answer (Doc. No. 60) is granted. The court assumes that

the other parties have no objection to the allowance of

the amendment; however, if they do, they must file the

objection within seven days from the date of this order.

DONE, this the 14th day of November, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 61 Filed 11/14/2007 Page 1 of 1
2915.606 Agency procedures.       When an unsolicited proposal is received by an official of the Department of Labor, the recipient of the proposal must forward it to the HCA. The HCA must address the requirements of FAR 15.604. The HCA must determine if there is an office(s) within the Department of Labor whose mission could be impacted by the proposal. If there is, the HCA must designate a recipient within that office as an “assignee”, and take the following action:          (a) Within seven (7) working days of receipt, the HCA must forward the proposal to the assignee along with instructions concerning the security, review and disposition of the document.          (1) Inform the offeror of this transfer in writing (preferably by facsimile or other electronic means).          (2) Within one (1) month of receipt of the unsolicited proposal by the assignee, the office receiving the proposal must determine the merit of the unsolicited proposal.          (i) If the office finds insufficient merit to consider the unsolicited proposal further, then a letter will be sent to inform the offeror that their proposal will not be considered further, and is not being retained.          (ii) If, after a comprehensive evaluation as defined by FAR 15.606-2, the office finds merit in the proposal, it must consult with a Department of Labor contracting officer for direction in complying with FAR 15.607. If not excluded by a condition of FAR 15.607(a), a requisition may be prepared in accordance with FAR 15.607(b). If the requirement exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold inclusive of options then a request must be prepared for the Procurement Review Board in accordance with Department of Labor procedures stated in Department of Labor Manual Series 2-830 (available by mail from the Division of Acquisition Management Services).          (b) If within one          (1)  			month of receipt (by the HCA) no assignee can be identified, the HCA must notify the offeror that the proposal is not being considered further.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2915.6 - Unsolicited Proposals
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Angeles
Income Properties, Ltd. IV 1999 Third Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000763049
<NAME> ANGELES INCOME PROPERTIES, LTD. IV
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,376
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          20,436
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,164
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,126
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         14,912
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,278)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,126
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,601
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,697
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,121
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,904
<EPS-BASIC>                                      12.02<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### PEOPLE, Respondent, v. WILLIAMS, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 8, 1906.)

Proceedings by the people of the state of New York against Bertha Williams.

No opinion. Motion denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 3, 2019

Order 

Clerk

July 3, 2019

159160

In re HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION

REGARDING CONSTITUTIONALITY OF

2018 PA 368 & 369 SC: 159160

_______________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the amici curiae representing each side of the 

constitutional question shall be allowed 15 minutes of oral argument separate from that of 

the Solicitor General and Deputy Solicitor General, to be divided in their discretion. The 

amici curiae must inform the clerk of the Court by July 11, 2019, the names of those 

attorneys who will be arguing for and against the constitutionality of 2018 PA 368 & 369.
# SUBPART 34.0 –– GENERAL

**Parent topic:**PART 34 –– MAJOR SYSTEM ACQUISITION

## 34.003 Responsibilities.

(a) The DISA Component Acquisition Executive (CAE) is the designee.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION



I, N. Voloshin, Chief Financial Officer
of Cavitation Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



The Annual Report on Amendment No. 3 on
Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2016 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. § 78m); and



The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: February 8, 2017 | /s/ N. VOLOSHIN                                
|---------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|                       | Name: N. VoloshinTitle: Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                            1256
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        5
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1261
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1261
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               66
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        1195
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1261
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    86
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       21
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   144
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (79)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (79)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (79)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.39)
        

</TABLE>