alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

 

 

I, Richard P. Buckanavage,  

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Harvest Capital Credit Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Dated this 31st day of March 2014.
#### § 956.23 Selection.

The Secretary shall select members and alternate members of the committee from the nominations made pursuant to § 956.22 or from other qualified persons.
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of
the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Avago Technologies Finance Pte. Ltd. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such
officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the accompanying report of the Company on Form 20-F for the period ended November 2, 2008 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: December 17, 2008 |  | /s/    HOCK E.
TAN     
|                        |  | Hock E. Tan            
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 32 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 1 of 1
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****USCIS monthly.**** 
SuDocNumber:HS8.18:
ItemNumber:0520-G-05(online)
CGPsystem Number:000605947
 
 
2007- USCIS_Monthly_02_07.pdfUSCIS_Monthly_03_07.pdfUSCIS_Monthly_04_07.pdfUSCIS_Monthly_06_07.pdfUSCIS_Monthly_09_07.pdfUSCIS_Monthly_10_07.pdfUSCIS_Monthly_11_07.pdfUSCIS_Monthly_12_07.pdf
 
2008- USCIS_Monthly_01_08.pdfUSCIS_Monthly_02_08.pdfUSCIS_Monthly_03_08.pdfUSCIS_Monthly_04_08.pdfUSCIS_Monthly_05_08.pdfUSCIS_Monthly_06_08.pdf
 
 **
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF RESPONSE ONCOLOGY, INC. FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH
31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           5,961
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,122
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,715
<INVENTORY>                                      3,187
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                49,823
<PP&E>                                          16,766
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,724
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 120,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,443
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         17
<COMMON>                                           123
<OTHER-SE>                                      47,376
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   120,100
<SALES>                                         35,586
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                35,586
<CGS>                                           24,165
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,804
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   210
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 827
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (473)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (180)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (293)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (293)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.02)


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of John Holbrook, Appellant-Respondent, v State Insurance Fund et al., Respondents-Appellants.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered June 17, 1980, granting petitioner reinstatement, for a further 12-week probationary period, as an associate attorney with the State Insurance Fund during which time he is to be observed by persons legally entitled to do so, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the petition dismissed. On June 7, 1979 petitioner was appointed an associate *841attorney for the State Insurance Fund and assigned to serve in the third-party division in a supervisory capacity. The appointment was conditioned upon satisfactory completion of a 12-week probationary period. On August 20, 1979 the fund’s director of administration advised petitioner he would be terminated effective August 29,1979. Believing factors other than job performance underlay his discharge, petitioner initiated this CPLR article 78 proceeding and Special Term concluded petitioner had not been afforded a fair probationary period, as he had been rated under “emergency conditions” and because confusion existed as to petitioner’s job title for, unlike other division heads, he was subject to supervision by a fellow division head. At the outset we note petitioner did not charge below that his rating occurred in the midst of an emergency state of affairs. Moreover, the fact he was evaluated at a time when the fund was severely backlogged and understaffed, conditions which in this belt tightening era are familiar, and usual to the fund, does not warrant finding emergency conditions prevailed. Also lacking in substance is the suggestion that confusion existed as to petitioner’s duties. Both prior to and following his appointment he was advised as to his responsibilities and the level of performance he was expected to attain. Nor do we see any impropriety in respondents’ action in placing the fund’s former, and experienced, third-party division head in a supervisory capacity over petitioner during the probationary period or in the fact that his termination was effected by the director of administration. On the issue of whether petitioner’s terminaton was prompted by unsatisfactory performance or, as he claims, because he uncovered and reported his immediate supervisor’s poor management practices, petitioner’s three supervisors detailed the specific acts which they maintain justified his dismissal. They declare, among other things, his conduct towards his peers and subordinates engendered hostility and in one instance even emotional stress, that he failed to follow fund policy respecting the routing and handling of legal department mail causing unnecessary delay in the distribution of important litigation mail and that he took upon himself the task of reviewing the operations of the legal department, thus diverting sorely needed time and energy from the work priorities his superiors had established for him. Since petitioner in his reply affidavit virtually confirms these observations, there was clearly ample rational justification for his termination. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Birns, Lupiano and Yesawich, JJ.
#### § 966.24 Districts.

For the purpose of determining the basis for selecting committee members the following districts of the production area are hereby initially established.

*District No. 1.* The counties of Broward and Dade in the State of Florida;

*District No. 2.* The counties of Brevard, Glades, Indian River, Martin, Osceola, Okeechobee, Palm Beach, and St. Lucie in the State of Florida;

*District No. 3.* The counties of Charlotte, Collier, Hendry, Lee, and Monroe in the State of Florida; and

*District No. 4.* The counties of De Soto, Hardee, Highlands, Hillsborough, Manatee, Pinellas, Polk, and Sarasota in the State of Florida.

[33 FR 8586, June 12, 1968]
)

/\ :

) /:,4cV-7o

2

9e^pOIfJL nhsI ) _______ __-__

____ ML *I-e. C..&urI 7Ze Cur+ ,s ,Vt* ,'idd

+t 5 4 ; V /15 TJI c a ur

,

lDtlI

1r; 5 r*L/hdd U.^J MAcJie/s

r e is' r i.i.-I r v e F i 1V)J

_____ Cj.. S e, 9- /( , . d- c .eu 41fr -

RLflAI.Aflfe!C) J2. L1,, I,,,. k41 L€ ..J kJ. La I- ji 1J

rr

1b5 ;b J5n-d. Th st __________

Case 1:06-cv-00703-MHT-CSC Document 57 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 1 of 4
it;'- ,c -h'lIe -d 19 )4 C4L *))/& 1-

Rir,' iicrre+ 4z' c//

ypki). M,,ora V^ /yd. C.ric&r

_________Cse JL4Mr S2Sr. zd 5'9 I.so ,Q/4b-iecDcJe

___________ L 7^ ,' /^- /L O h ci /L&- '2 w e c e. ro ke.. A). T1Lk

3_ 33' 4AbqM fcL _)9> )G.ç c4/5b bcDKeJ,

/o S1.d4-L J S1-r1A '72 '7 2L 14'7

t1-)e. !3M p -/' crA +hle i3?-Ib--// k)er _______-

a -O2? +

it., )4rr/ 1bUk14)Je i&eM) MIk..S ou#/ce

-c --- 1i;-)-- -c crI r ,

1,)) DLc *-

Rc9& Cowfrl5/i r

WCL1,IV1 Co4i T!/ /efe

y a! tt' I r*cpp rc1 n C. a . 4io

______- r bii W5 lIZ e.. Wc1 i'tJe.. ye. r c c rre $ * tc r r h

___ hit A/cl ., 4v i,e r * !jer K5 C e. r e.. L.2c ^ -

AJt r t 5 M r PA y r p ç

Case 1:06-cv-00703-MHT-CSC Document 57 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 2 of 4
n

:: .4-

C

JO/p13 ,.

-4^e cL

P Mli-e 7A

'

p 7L - r

.L. I

I

I I I

___________ nu ô//rc worL

__________ t. LrvK,'ij +It Jo iv rcdp L4/

_________ t4o a-icJ i-1-

__________ 'i Y.s'i $1 bJ bU1+/ fQ,*)-1OU+ +c 'av5 / +1

1r^?J4i/ o1 * 1d 'ed

__________ 47, ii ai-42er rrJr 4oit-& o _1r11L -i-v oIr -

_________ o,pprovcl L1 aZJr 5PY J.4( k'l J-I Cr)L

____________ ci Sac..,y' ri'is c/ J^/4w.,4'-

ü JTL5 - -/-7c i.' i.'t e , Id c- e. A e-'.

-r. i- - -/ +I-s (MAVP

7 g JdI -/-1 e7li3

45 dJ : ;) I-1-i L kCJc etf/?V AA- 1A'

c c d S 1/ 2E I- ,

50 +7' 141. itA '' 7 k'

I__;//,d e c71e

Eii-y v'i1VecI; j4,94 JZ30ZO'6'

Case 1:06-cv-00703-MHT-CSC Document 57 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 3 of 4
cERrJFIc/TF ci f,qyJcf

j .. SI i iI -

/oYe4'on 11 hX u.s. ,'i,;

,'oh-cV- 7"

I

us, vn,,n sr,tJi, /rdf1oy

P2m'oP1EfY1 ,91 3113c

-__ WaYdi9i2 /(L'72flM )rn's1

,L?o 8zi/2c/i" 4?p//a/( Ct(ec,,,'ia/ ftzc,'/i'Ifr'

RoBcY.c/ô7 ,Jn, c'tiiac A21 ?IOR9-c1a '

31o/-p 7/1 ________________

Li ic' i, L , II ( I Q?

I p

yI

Case 1:06-cv-00703-MHT-CSC Document 57 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 4 of 4
PART 753—FORMS       Authority:                            Sec. 621, Pub. L. 87–195, 75 Stat. 445 (22 U.S.C. 2381), as amended; E.O. 12163, Sept. 29, 1979 44 FR 56673, 3 CFR, 1979 Comp., p. 435.          Source:                            53 FR 50632, Dec. 16, 1988, unless otherwise noted.                                       Subpart 753.1—General                                                         753.107 Obtaining forms.                                                                             Subpart 753.2—Prescription of Forms                                                         753.270 Prescription of USAID forms.                                                                             Subpart 753.3—Illustration of Forms                                                         753.300 Scope of subpart.    **Parent topic:** SUBCHAPTER H—CLAUSES AND FORMSSubpart 753.1—General    753.107 Obtaining forms.       Copies of any USAID Form referenced in the AIDAIR may be obtained from the U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington, DC 20523–0001, Attention: M/AS/ISS, Distribution, Room B–929 N.S., or from the cognizant contracting officer.Subpart 753.2—Prescription of Forms    753.270 Prescription of USAID forms.       The requirements for use of USAID forms are contained in parts 701 through 752 where the subject matter applicable to the form is addressed.Subpart 753.3—Illustration of Forms    753.300 Scope of subpart.       USAID forms are not illustrated in the AIDAR. Copies of any USAID form prescribed in the AIDAR may be obtained as provided in 753.107.
#### § 900.18 Hearing before Secretary.

The Secretary may act in the place and stead of a judge in any proceeding under this subpart. When he so acts the hearing clerk shall transmit the record to the Secretary at the expiration of the period provided for the filing of proposed findings of fact, conclusions and orders, and the Secretary shall thereupon, after due consideration of the record, issue his final decision in the proceeding: *Provided,* That he may issue a tentative decision in which event the parties shall be afforded an opportunity to file exceptions before the issuance of the final decision.
#### § 958.1 Secretary.

*Secretary* means the Secretary of Agriculture of the United States or any officer or employee of the United States Department of Agriculture to whom authority has heretofore been delegated, or to whom authority may hereafter be delegated, to act in his stead.
(51 Misc. 643)(113 App. Div. 912)

#### CULLINAN, Excise Com’r, v. FEDERAL UNION SURETY CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 8, 1906.)

1. Costs—Recovery by Plaintiff—Costs of Counsel—Action on Liquor Dealer’s Bond.

An action by the excise commisioner on a liquor dealer’s bond is one on a contract obligation, and not to recover a penalty or forfeiture, and hence plaintiff on recovery by him is entitled to costs of counsel under Code Civ. Proc. § 3228, subd. 4, relating to costs in an action to recover a sum of money, and not to recover a penally or forfeiture.

[Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see vol. 13, Cent. Dig. Costs, §§ 26-35; vol. 29, Cent. Dig. Intoxicating Liquors, § 91.]

2. Same—Witness—Fees.

In an action on a liquor dealer’s bond by the excise commissioner, plaintiff may tax disbursements for witnesses and fees, though the witnesses were special excise agents.

[Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see vol. 13, Cent. Dig. Costs, §§ 725, 730.]

Action by Patrick W. Cullinan, as state commissioner of excise, against the Federal Union Surety ' Company. Order affirmed on opinion of the Special Term.

The following is the opinion of Smith, J.:

In the ease of Cullinan v. Burkard, 93 App. Div. 31, 86 N. Y. Supp. 1003, in an action upon a similar bond, the court decided that the action was upon a contract obligation, and not one to recover a penalty or forfeiture impressed by statute. The plaintiff is therefore entitled to recover cost of the action by force of provision of section 3228, subd. 4, of the Code of Civil Procedure. The affidavit presented to the clerk on presentation of witnesses, fees, and disbursements were sufficient to justify his taxation of such disbursements. I know of no reason why plaintiff should not be allowed to tax disbursements for witnesses and fees when the witnesses are special excise agents. See, also, Lyman ¡v. Young Men’s Cosmopolitan Club, etc., 38 App. Div. 220, 56 N. Y. Supp. 712. Motion denied, with $10 costs.

Argued before JENKS, HOOKER, GAYNOR, RICH, and MILLER, JJ.

Chas. MacKenzie, for appellant.

Herman J. Kellogg, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, on the opinion of Mr. Justice Wilmot M. Smith at Special Term.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         21,580
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         1,599
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               4,312
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    116,893
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           0
<LOANS>                                        453,020
<ALLOWANCE>                                    5,557
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 628,840
<DEPOSITS>                                     496,648
<SHORT-TERM>                                   8,381
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            6,326
<LONG-TERM>                                    58,176
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       515
<OTHER-SE>                                     58,794
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 628,840
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                10,745
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              1,815
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               112
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               12,672
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             4,962
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             5,703
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          6,969
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  849
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                5,505
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2,261
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     2,261
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,493
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .29
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 4.85
<LOANS-NON>                                    1,909
<LOANS-PAST>                                   0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               73
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                7,987
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               5,281
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  818
<RECOVERIES>                                   245
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              5,557
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           5,557
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        0


</TABLE>