alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                             5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from NATIONAL
PROPERTY  INVESTORS 8 2000 Third Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                 0000763701
<NAME>                                NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS 8
<MULTIPLIER>                                              1,000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                        JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                      683
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               302
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              0 <F1>
<PP&E>                                                   31,527
<DEPRECIATION>                                          (18,499)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           14,896
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         0 <F1>
<BONDS>                                                  14,735
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                               (1,005)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             14,896
<SALES>                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          3,583
<CGS>                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          3,782
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          794
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            (181)
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                               (380)
<EPS-BASIC>                                               (8.38)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0
<FN>
<F1> Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet. <F2> Multiplier is 1.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Subpart 942.2 - Contract Administration

Services

Source: 65 FR 81007, Dec. 22, 2000, unless otherwise noted.

Parent topic: PART 942 - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT SERVICES

942.270-1 Contracting Officer's Representatives.

In accordance with internal agency procedures, a contracting officer may designate other qualified

personnel to be the Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) for the purpose of performing

certain technical functions in administering a contract. These functions include, but are not limited

to, technical monitoring, inspection, approval of shop drawings, testing, and approval of samples.

The COR acts solely as a technical representative of the contracting officer and is not authorized to

perform any function that results in a change in the scope, price, terms or conditions of the contract.

COR designations must be made in writing by the contracting officer, and shall identify the

responsibilities and limitations of the designation. A copy of the COR designation must be furnished

to the contractor and the contract administration office.

942.270-2 Contract clause.

The clause at 952.242-70, Technical Direction, or a clause substantially the same, may be inserted in

solicitations and contracts when a designated Contracting Officer's Representative will issue

technical direction to the contractor under the contract.
2006-0691.

#### State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Reid.

Cuyahoga App. No. 87718. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. It appears from the records of the court that the appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due May 1, 2006, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause is dismissed sua sponte.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                               5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of Realmark Property Investors Limited Partnership IV for
the six months ended June 30, 1999, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                            1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                                        40,013
<SECURITIES>                                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                      0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             522,617
<PP&E>                                                    13,249,196
<DEPRECIATION>                                             5,686,124
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             8,262,456
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      4,290,369
<BONDS>                                                    7,222,879
<COMMON>                                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              0
<PREFERRED>                                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                                         0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               8,262,456
<SALES>                                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           1,021,033
<CGS>                                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              1,581,065
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           601,775
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             (560,032)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                                (560,032)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                 (23.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      0


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350****AS ADDED BY****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of First Community Financial Corporation, (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the“Report”), I, James R. McLaughlin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2.          To my knowledge, theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.

 

|                  |   |      |
|-----------------------|--------|-----------|
| Date: August 13, 2003 |   | By:  | /s/ JAMES R. MCLAUGHLIN |
|                  |   |      |  |
|                  |   |      | **James R. McLaughlin, President & CEO** |
#### § 900.20 Words in the singular form.

Words in this subpart in the singular form shall be deemed to import the plural, and vice versa, as the case may demand.
Subpart 1342.1 - Contract Audit Services    **Parent topic:** PART 1342 - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION1342.102 Assignment of contract audit services.1342.102-70 Interagency contract administration and audit services.       (a) Generally, the final invoice shall not be approved until a close-out audit has been performed and all outstanding issues have been negotiated or resolved on the following types of contracts valued at $500,000 and above:          (1) Cost-reimbursement type contracts;          (2) The cost-reimbursement portion of fixed-price contracts;          (3) Letter contracts which provide for reimbursement of costs;          (4) Time-and-materials contracts; and          (5) Labor-hour contracts.          (b) If a close-out audit is not required, an audit may be requested regardless of the contract value when the contracting officer determines that an audit is justified under one of the following circumstances:          (1) There is some evidence of fraud or waste;          (2) The contractor's performance under the contract has been questionable;          (3) The contractor had a high incidence of unallowable costs under a previous contract;          (4) The contract is with a newly-established firm, or a firm that has just begun dealing with the Government.
# Subpart 736.5—Contract Clauses

**Parent topic:**PART 736—CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS

## 736.570 Disability standards in construction contracts.

Contracting officers must insert the clause at 752.236–70, Standards for Accessibility for the Disabled in USAID Construction Contracts, in all solicitations and contracts for construction or renovations made using program funds.
22.101-3 Reporting labor disputes.

(S-90) After becoming aware of labor disputes (actual or potential) involving a contractor, the

contracting officer shall take prompt action consistent with the following instructions:

(1) Notify local legal counsel and the HCO by the most expeditious means. When possible, the HCO

should be given an in-depth briefing regarding the actual or potential labor disputes by the

contracting officer.

(2) Notify the affected customers by message or letter of the actual or potential labor disputes that

could delay, or threaten to delay the timely contract performance.

(S-91) Legal counsel, ICW the HCO, will furnish all pertinent information relating to actual or

potential labor disputes promptly to the HCA and the DISA Labor Advisor. The Labor Advisor for

DISA is the Associate General Counsel, Personnel and Employment Law.

Parent topic: SUBPART 22.1 –– BASIC LABOR POLICIES
NOTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

JUAN WILLIAM ARRENDONDOLOPEZ,

Petitioner

v.

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent

______________________

2023

- 2351

______________________
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection

Board in No. PH

- 0714

- 17

- 0438

- C

- 1

.

______________________

O R D E R

The petitioner having failed to file the required Entry of Appearance form by an attorney admitted to the bar of this court, and to file the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, and to file the brief required by Federal Circuit Rule 31 (a) within the time permitted, it is

ORDERED that the petiti on for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in Case: 23-2351 Document: 6 Page: 1 Filed: 11/17/2023A RRENDONDOLOPEZ V

. DVA 2

accordance with the rules.

FOR THE COURT

November 17, 2023

Date /s/ Jarrett B. Perlow

Jarrett B. Perlow

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: November 17, 2023 Case: 23-2351 Document: 6 Page: 2 Filed: 11/17/2023
Case 1:06-cv-00708-CSC Document 3 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00708-CSC Document 3 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Soleil Capital L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Adam J. Laufer, Chief Financial Officer of Soleil Capital Management L.L.C., the general partner of the Partnership, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 29, 2011



/s/ Adam J . LauferAdam J . LauferChief Financial Officer
of Soleil Capital Management L.L.C.




|* | The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subpart 5604.1 - CONTRACT EXECUTION

Parent topic: Part 5604 - ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS

5604.103 Contract Clause. (Removed August 2017).
Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 44 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 1 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 44 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 2 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 44 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 3 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 44 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 4 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 44 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 5 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 44 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 6 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 44 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 7 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 44 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 8 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 44 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 9 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 44 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 10 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 44 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 11 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 44 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 12 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 44 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 13 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 44 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 14 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 44 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 15 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 44 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 16 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 44 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 17 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 44 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 18 of 19
Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 44 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 19 of 19
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>



<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>            JUN-30-1999

<CASH>                         16,749,125
<SECURITIES>                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                  17,396,929
<ALLOWANCES>                         0
<INVENTORY>                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               34,146,054
<PP&E>                        143,180,159
<DEPRECIATION>                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                185,548,745
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          70,265,790
<BONDS>                       145,188,468
<COMMON>                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0
<PREFERRED>                          0
<OTHER-SE>                    (48,158,064)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  185,548,745
<SALES>                        16,367,895
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               17,121,493
<CGS>                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   6,893,805
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  672,142
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             10,487,566
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (932,020)
<INCOME-TAX>                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (2,164,725)
<DISCONTINUED>                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0
<CHANGES>                            0
<NET-INCOME>                   (2,164,725)
<EPS-BASIC>                       (4.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (4.68)



</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

D E ENTERPRISES, LLC, etc., )

 )

Plaintiff, )

 )

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06cv692-WHA

 )

ZURICH NORTH AMERICA, etc., )

 )

Defendant. )

ORDER

This case has been reassigned to the undersigned judge, and is now before the court on

Defendant Assurance Company of America’s Motion to Stay (Doc. #9), and Plaintiff’s Response

(Doc. #11). Neither the motion nor the response indicates that the attorneys for the parties have

discussed this matter with each other before involving the court. Time and expense could have

been saved by their doing so. Therefore, it is hereby

ORDERED that the motion is DENIED, without prejudice to re-filing a simple motion

stating a joint request agreed to by the parties.

DONE this 11th day of January, 2007.

/s/ W. Harold Albritton 

W. HAROLD ALBRITTON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 12 Filed 01/11/2007 Page 1 of 1
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

MAXIE McNABB, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv664-MHT

) 

SANDERS LEAD COMPANY, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion to strike and

alternative motion to allow sur-reply (Doc. No. 37) are

set for submission, without oral argument, on September

18, 2007, with all briefs due by said date.

DONE, this the 11th day of September, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00664-MHT-SRW Document 39 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cv-00693-ID-TFM Document 7 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### § 985.31 Research and development projects.

The Committee, with the approval of the Secretary, may establish or provide for the establishment of production research, marketing research and development projects designed to assist, improve, or promote the marketing, distribution and consumption or efficient production of oil. The Committee shall consider ongoing research, by industry and grower organizations, in making its recommendations. The expense of such projects shall be paid from funds collected pursuant to § 985.41.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3362 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3362

      To exempt woven fiberglass mesh fabric from certain quotas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 5, 2006

 Mr. Chambliss introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To exempt woven fiberglass mesh fabric from certain quotas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WOVEN FIBERGLASS MESH FABRIC.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
quota imposed under category 622 established pursuant to the Committee 
for the Implementation of Textile Agreements (CITA) with respect to 
certain textile and apparel articles shall not apply to woven 
fiberglass mesh fabric provided for in subheading 7019.40.40 of the 
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States.
    (b) Effective Date.--The provision in subsection (a) applies to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
745.107 Contract clauses.

(a) The contracting officer must insert the clause at (48 CFR) AIDAR 752.245–71 in all contracts

under which the contractor will acquire property for use overseas and the contract funds were

obligated under a Development Objective Agreement (DOAG) (or similar bilateral obligating

agreement) with the cooperating country.

(b) The contracting officer must insert the applicable clause as required in (48 CFR) FAR 45.107 and

(48 CFR) AIDAR 752.245–70 in all contracts under which the contractor will acquire property with

funds not already obligated under a DOAG (or similar bilateral obligating agreement) with the

cooperating country.

Parent topic: Subpart 745.1—General
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

M IDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABA M A

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

November 28, 2006

NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE

To: ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD

Case Style: Elrick Harris v. Option One Mortgage Corporation et al

Case Number: 2:06cv0630-ID

Referenced Pleading: Notices to Take Depositions

Docket Entry Numbers: 12, 13, 14

The referenced pleading was electronically filed on 11/27/06 in this case and is not in

compliance with the local rules and/or administrative procedures of this court. 

******This pleading is discovery and is not allowed pursuant to Local Rule 5.1 NON-FILING

OF CIVIL DISCOVERY.

The pleading is hereby STRICKEN from the record and the parties are instructed to disregard

the entry of this pleading on the court’s docket. Parties should be aware that the striking of

this entry does not affect their responsibilities as to the discovery process.

Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 15 Filed 11/28/2006 Page 1 of 1