alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D2023-3081

LT Case No. 2022-301750-CFDB

_____________________________

BRANDON M. FOX,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County.

Elizabeth A. Blackburn, Judge.

Asad Ali, and Robert I. Mandell, of Mandell Law, P.A., Orlando,

for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Stephen R. 

Putnam, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for 

Appellee.

August 13, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LAMBERT, KILBANE, and MACIVER, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
# L_2015291DE.01001101.xml

| 7.11.2015 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 291/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2015

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 291/11

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 136/2014 der Kommission vom 11. Februar 2014 zur Änderung der Richtlinie 2007/46/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates und der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 692/2008 der Kommission hinsichtlich der Emissionen von leichten Personenkraftwagen und Nutzfahrzeugen (Euro 5 und Euro 6) sowie der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 582/2011 hinsichtlich der Emissionen von schweren Nutzfahrzeugen (Euro VI)

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 43 vom 13. Februar 2014
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 43 vom 13. Februar 2014

Seite 19, Anhang I Nummer 3 Buchstabe c Ziffer iii zur Änderung von Anhang IV Teil 1 Anlage 2 Nummer 4 Teil I der Richtlinie 2007/46/EG (Hinzufügen von Punkt 41a in der Tabelle), rechte Spalte der Tabelle unter der Überschrift „Vorschriften zur Gewährleistung des ordnungsgemäßen Arbeitens von Einrichtungen zur Begrenzung der NOx-Emissionen“:

x

anstatt:

„Das Fahrzeug muss mit einem System ausgestattet sein, das das ordnungsgemäße Arbeiten von Einrichtungen zur Begrenzung der NOx-Emissionen gemäß Anhang XIII der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 482/2011 gewährleistet.“

x

muss es heißen:

„Das Fahrzeug muss mit einem System ausgestattet sein, das das ordnungsgemäße Arbeiten von Einrichtungen zur Begrenzung der NOx-Emissionen gemäß Anhang XIII der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 582/2011 gewährleistet.“

x

Seite 21, Anhang I Nummer 3 Buchstabe c Ziffer vi zur Änderung von Anhang IV Teil I Anlage 2 Nummer 4 Teil II der Richtlinie 2007/46/EG (Hinzufügen von Punkt 41a in der Tabelle), rechte Spalte der Tabelle unter der Überschrift „Vorschriften zur Gewährleistung des ordnungsgemäßen Arbeitens von Einrichtungen zur Begrenzung der NOx-Emissionen“:

x

anstatt:

„Das Fahrzeug muss mit einem System ausgestattet sein, das das ordnungsgemäße Arbeiten von Einrichtungen zur Begrenzung der NOx-Emissionen gemäß Anhang XIII der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 482/2011 gewährleistet.“

x

muss es heißen:

„Das Fahrzeug muss mit einem System ausgestattet sein, das das ordnungsgemäße Arbeiten von Einrichtungen zur Begrenzung der NOx-Emissionen gemäß Anhang XIII der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 582/2011 gewährleistet.“

x

---
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3071 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3071

To suspend temporarily the duty on fabric woven with certain continuous 
             filament wholly nylon type-66 textured yarns.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

  Mr. Allard introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on fabric woven with certain continuous 
             filament wholly nylon type-66 textured yarns.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FABRIC WOVEN WITH CERTAIN CONTINUOUS FILAMENT WHOLLY NYLON 
              TYPE-66 TEXTURED YARNS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.10.02      Fabric woven with   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         continuous                                                         31/2009
                         filament wholly
                         nylon type-66
                         textured yarns,
                         such fabric
                         capable of
                         stretching by at
                         least 100 percent
                         in the weft
                         direction and
                         having a tenacity
                         of less than 53
                         cN/tex (provided
                         for in subheading
                         5407.41.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
---

Exhibit 21

Subsidiaries of THT Heat Transfer Technology, Inc.

Name of Subsidiary
    Jurisdiction of Organization
    % OwnedMegaway International Holdings Limited
    British Virgin Islands
    100%Star
      Wealth International Holdings Limited
    Hong
      Kong
    100%Siping City Juyuan Hanyang Plate Heat Exchanger Co. Ltd.
    PRC
    100%Beijing Juyuan Hanyang Heat Exchange Equipment Co., Ltd.
    PRC
    75%Juyuan Heat Equipment (Tianjin) Co., Ltd.
    PRC
    99.5%


---
Subpart 1413.2 - Micro-Purchase

Parent topic: PART 1413 - SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES

1413.201 General.

The procedures set forth in the Federal Supply Schedule for Government-wide Commercial Credit

Card Services, Treasury Financial Manual, TFM 4-4500, and “U.S. Department of Interior Handbook

for Utilization of Government Wide Commercial Credit Card” issued by PAM contain guidance on

using Government-wide purchase card services.

1413.202-70 Policy.

(a) The purchase card shall be used in preference to other methods of procurement for purchases up

to $3,000. Other small purchase methods (BPAs, imprest funds, third-party drafts, SF-44 forms, and

purchase orders) may be used in lieu of the Government purchase card when it is more cost-effective

or practicable.

(b) The purchase card shall be issued primarily to personnel outside of procurement offices to

purchase products and services up to the micro-purchase threshold ($2,000 for construction).

(c) The purchase card may be used in procurement offices for purchases up to the simplified

acquisition threshold ($50,000 if not interim FACNET certified) not to exceed individual warrant

limitations.

(d) Each contracting activity shall develop more specific procedures for use of purchase cards.
§ 923.142 Reserve fund. ( a ) The establishment of a reserve fund of an amount which shall not exceed approximately 1 fiscal year's operational expenses is appropriate and necessary to the maintenance and functioning of the Washington Cherry Marketing Committee. The committee is authorized to expend any funds in such reserve for expenses authorized pursuant to § 923.42.
( b ) Terms used in this section shall have the same meaning as given to the respective term in said marketing agreement and order.
[33 FR 9147, June 21, 1968. Redesignated at 44 FR 73011, Dec. 17, 1979]
#### Webb *v.*The State.

November 11, 1913.

Lumpkin, J.

1. If the trial judge undertakes to instruct the jury as to the methods by which a witness may he impeached, he should instruct them as to all the methods of impeachment, so far as the instructions are authorized by the evidence. But it has been held by this court that his failure to do so will not require the grant of a new trial, where no written request was made to charge the jury as to the mode of impeachment omitted from his instructions upon the subject of impeachment of witnesses. *Mitten &c. R. Co.*v. *Allen,*130 *Ga.*656 (5), 657 (61 S. E. 541).

2. Where, on the trial of one indicted for murder, the evidence on behalf of the State showed that the decedent was shot by the accused just outside of a house, and a witness testified that just after the shooting the accused had a pistol in his hand, that his wife and the witness, hearing shooting, were going out of the door of the house, and that the accused told them to get back out of the door, as they were liable to get shot, and that he had got one man (applying a vile epithet to him) “falling on his knees now,” and did not know who it was, such evidence authorized a charge to the effect that all confessions of guilt should be received with great caution, and that a confession uncorroborated would not be sufficient to warrant a conviction. *Jones*v. *State,*130 *Ga.*274 (4), 277 (60 S. E. 840).

*(a)*The statement mentioned in the preceding headnote was not merely an admission of some minor or subordinate fact or' series of facts, which could be true whether the main fact existed or not; but, in the light of the other evidence, it amounted to a statement that the accused had shot the decedent, with no exculpatory addition; or at least the jury could have so found.

(b) The charge was not erroneous in itself, and no request for a further charge on the subject was made.

3. The evidence authorized the verdict, and there was no error in overruling the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*780Indictment for murder. Before Judge Worrill. Early superior court. July 8,1913.

*Bembo & Wright,*for plaintiff in error.

*T. S. Felder, attorney-general, B. T. Oastellow, solicitor-general,*and *B. B. Arnold,*contra.
#### MOUNTAIN TOP BEVERAGE GROUP, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WILDLIFE BREWING N.B., INC.; James Sorenson, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 04-4075.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted: Dec. 7, 2005.

Decided and Filed: Dec. 22, 2005.

ARGUED: David L. Petitjean, Chappano Wood, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: Thomas P. Whelley II, Rachael L. Rodman, Chernesky, Heyman *&*Kress, Dayton, Ohio, for Appellant. David L. Petitjean, Chappano Wood, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellees.

Before: MOORE, ROGERS, and McKEAGUE, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

ROGERS, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff Mountain Top Beverage Group appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Wildlife Brewing and James Sorenson on Mountain Top’s trademark infringement claims under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1114, 1125(a), and related state law claims, and the district court’s cancellation of Mountain Top’s ‘Wildcat” trademarks. After reviewing the record, the parties’ briefs, and the applicable law, this court affirms the district court’s decision for the reasons stated in Judge Dlott’s order below. *See Mountain Top Beverage Group, Inc. v. Wildlife Brewing N.B., Inc. et al,*338 F.Supp.2d 827 (SD.Ohio 2003).1 The district court properly granted summary judgment in favor of Wildlife and Sorenson and cancelled Mountain Top’s trademark. The judgment of the district court is therefore AFFIRMED.

1

. We do not reach the issues resolved in part III.C of the district court’s order, *Mountain Top,*338 F.Supp.2d at 836-37, as there was no cross-appeal raising those issues.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0364

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

SHANE MEDORE MAGGI,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 5, 2023, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 25 2023

07/25/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0364
EPA FORM 6100

- 4 (DBE Subcontractor Utilization Form) OMB Control No:

Approved:

Approval Expires:

Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program

DBE Subcontractor Utilization Form

This form is intended to capture the prime contractor’s actual and/or anticipated use of identified certified DBE 1

subcontractor s 2 and the estimated dollar amount of each subcontract . A n EPA Financial Assistance Agreement

R ecipient must require its prime contractor s to complete this form an d include it in the bid or proposal package.

Prime contractors should also maintain a copy of this form on file.

Subcontractor Name Project Name

Bid/ Proposal No. Assistance Agreement ID No. (if known) Point of Contact

Address

Telephone No. Email Address

Prime Contractor Name Issuing/Funding Entity:

I have identified potential DBE

certified subcontractors ___ YES ___ NO

If yes, please complete the tabl e below. If no, please explain:

Company Name Company Address/ Phone/ Email Est. Dollar

Amt Currently

DBE

Certified?

1 A DBE is a Disadvantaged, Minority, or Woman Business Enterprise that has been certified by an entity from which EPA accepts certifications as

described in 40 CFR 33.204

- 33.205 or certified by EPA. EPA accepts certifications from entities that meet or exceed EPA certification standards as

described in 40 CFR 33.202.

2 Subcontractor is defined as a company, firm, joint venture, or individual who enters into an agr eement with a contractor to provide

services pursuant to an EPA award of financial assistance. Continue on back if neededEPA FORM 6100

- 4 (DBE Subcontractor Utilization Form) OMB Control No:

Approved:

Approval Expires:

Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program

DBE Subcontractor Utilization Form

I certify under penalty of perjury that the forgoing statements are true and correct

. Signing this form does not

signify a commitment to utilize the subcontractors above

. I am aware of t hat i n the event of a replacement of a

subcontractor, I will adhere to the replacement requirements set forth in 40 CFR Part 33 Section 33.302 (c).

Prime Contractor Signature Title/ date

The public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average three (3) hours

per response. Send comments on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden

estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including through the use of automated

collection techniques to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2822T), 1200

Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20460. Include the OMB control number in any correspondence. Do not send

the completed form to this addre ss.
#### § 948.102 Communications.

Unless otherwise provided in §§ 948.1 to 948.92, or by specific direction of an area committee, all reports, applications, submittals, requests and communications in connection with the order shall be addressed to the office of the committee for the area in which the potatoes involved are grown.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

D E ENTERPRISES, LLC, d/b/a CASCADES )

DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No:3:06 CV-692

)

)

ZURICH NORTH AMERICA d/b/a )

ASSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, )

)

Defendant. )

PARTIES’ JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

COME NOW the plaintiff and defendant, by and through their undersigned

counsel, and hereby stipulate that the above-entitled action is and shall be dismissed with

prejudice, each party to bear his, her, or its own costs.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Lee Benton______________ /s/ Anne Laurie Smith______________

Lee R. Benton (BENTL8421) THOMAS M. O'HARA (OHART4140)

Amy M. Hazelton (MAYA4742) ANNE LAURIE SMITH (SMITA2262)

Attorneys for Plaintiff DE Enterprises Attorneys for Assurance Company of

LLC America and Zurich North America

Of counsel: Of Counsel:

Benton & Centeno, LLP McDowell, Knight, Roedder & Sledge

2019 Third Avenue North 63 South Royal St., Suite 900

Birmingham, AL 35203 P.O. Box 350

Telephone: 205-278-8000 Mobile, AL 36601

E-mail: Lbenton@bcattys.com Telephone: 251-432-5300

Facsimile: 251-432-5303

E-mail: asmith@mcdowellknight.com

Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 17 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 26

th

ay of April 2007, served a true and correct copy

of the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send

notification of such filing to the following:

/s/ Anne Laurie Smith______________

COUNSEL:

Lee R. Benton, Esq.

Benton & Centeno LLP

2019 Third Avenue North

Birmingham, AL 35203

Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 17 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### § 955.23 Selection.

From the nominations made pursuant to § 955.22 or from other qualified persons, the Secretary shall select members and alternate members of the committee.
#### In the Matter of Roger William Wilber an Attorney.

Resignation from the Bar accepted and name stricken from roll of attorneys and counselors at law. All concur. Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Del Veeehio, JJ.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

§ 810.1602 Definition of other terms. ( a ) *Classes.* There are two classes for soybeans: Yellow soybeans and Mixed soybeans. ( 1 ) *Yellow soybeans.* Soybeans that have yellow or green seed coats and which, in cross section, are yellow or have a yellow tinge, and may include not more than 10.0 percent of soybeans of other colors. Soybeans of other colors are soybeans that have black or bicolored seedcoats, as well as soybeans that have green seedcoats and are green in cross section. Bicolored soybeans will have seed coats of two colors, one of which is brown or black, and the brown or black color covers 50 percent of the seed coats. The hilum of a soybean is not considered a part of the seed coat for this determination.
( 2 ) *Mixed soybeans.* Soybeans that do not meet the requirements of the class Yellow soybeans.
( b ) *Damaged kernels.* Soybeans and pieces of soybeans that are badly ground-damaged, badly weather-damaged, diseased, frost-damaged, germ-damaged, heat-damaged, insect-bored, mold-damaged, sprout-damaged, stinkbug-stung, or otherwise materially damaged. Stinkbug-stung kernels are considered damaged kernels at the rate of one-fourth of the actual percentage of the stung kernels.
( c ) *Foreign material.* All matter that passes through an 8 ⁄ 64 round-hole sieve and all matter other than soybeans remaining in the sieved sample after sieving according to procedures prescribed in FGIS instructions.
( d ) *Heat-damaged kernels.* Soybeans and pieces of soybeans that are materially discolored and damaged by heat.
( e ) *Purple mottled or stained.* Soybeans that are discolored by the growth of a fungus; or by dirt; or by a dirt-like substance(s) including nontoxic inoculants; or by other nontoxic substances.
( f ) *Sieve— 8⁄64 round-hole sieve.* A metal sieve 0.032 inch thick perforated with round holes 0.125 (8 ⁄ 64) inch in diameter.
( g ) *Splits.* Soybeans with more than 1 ⁄ 4 of the bean removed and that are not damaged.
[52 FR 24418, June 30, 1987, as amended at 88 FR 45056, July 14, 2023]
#### In the Matter of Thomas Lawson et al., Appellants, v. Board of Education of the Vestal Central School District, Respondent.

Motion for a preliminary injunction pending appeal, insofar as it seeks to restrain respondent from placing any teacher employed by it on probation pursuant to a determination made by the Superintendent of Schools of respondent under section 210 of the Civil Service Law, granted, without costs and without prejudice to a motion to vacate the injunction in the event appellants shall fail to file, on or before July 31, 1970, record, brief and notice of argument for the term commencing September 9, 1970. Motion in all other respects denied, without costs. Respondent is directed to place the moneys withheld from appellants’ wages in an interest bearing escrow account. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Sweeney, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>

This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from National
Housing  Partnership  Realty Fund Two 1999 First Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.

</LEGEND>

<CIK>                               0000762859
<NAME>                              National Housing Partnership Realty Fund Two
<MULTIPLIER>                                               1


<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                                25,344
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              0
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           0 <F1>
<PP&E>                                                     0
<DEPRECIATION>                                             0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     4,405,398
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      0 <F1>
<BONDS>                                            2,414,468
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                        (2,728,803)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       4,405,398
<SALES>                                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      57,932
<CGS>                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     113,990
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    61,162
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            0
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (56,058)
<EPS-BASIC>                                            (3.00)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0
<FN>

<F1> Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet. <F2> Multiplier is 1.

</FN>


</TABLE>