alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

STEVE ADAMS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:06cv707-ID

vs. )

)

MERCHANTS FOODSERVICE, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that this matter be and is hereby set for a mediation

conference on October 19, 2007, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 4B, United States Courthouse,

One Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama. It is further

ORDERED that counsel and the parties or a representative with full authority to settle

the case shall appear at and attend this conference. The plaintiff should be prepared to

present documents substantiating any claims for damages.

If counsel have not held a good faith, face-to-face settlement conference as required

in the court’s scheduling order, counsel shall hold this conference not less than seven days

prior to the date set for mediation. On or before the close of business on October 17, 2007,

each party shall provide the undersigned judge with a confidential mediation conference

statement. The statement should not be filed with the clerk's office and should not be served

on the other parties. The parties may transmit the statement to chambers by facsimile at

(334) 954-3709. The statement is solely for the court's use in preparing for the mediation

conference. The statement shall be limited to ten (10) pages and should include:

1. An estimate of the costs of future litigation in this case, including the cost of trial

and trial preparation;

2. A history of the litigation and past settlement discussions including the results of

the face-to-face settlement conference;

Case 2:06-cv-00707-ID-CSC Document 24 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

3. A explanation of the party's claims or defenses and a candid assessment of the

strengths and weaknesses of those claims or defenses;

4. A candid statement of the following:

a. the party’s objectives in this litigation.

b. the nature of the relationship between the party and counsel.

c. sensitive issues or matters.

5. The relief sought -- where damages are sought, the party should provide the court

with evidence supporting the damage request. 

6. A full and complete explanation of any subrogation claims and how these claims

impact on the plaintiff’s claim for damages.

7. Counsel’s candid assessment of any impediments to settlement.

8. Counsel's assessment about whether opening statements from counsel will benefit

the mediation process.

In addition to the foregoing, prior to the mediation conference counsel shall confer

and attempt to agree upon the form and contents of mutual releases for execution if this case

is settled.

Done this 21st day of September, 2007.

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00707-ID-CSC Document 24 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 2 of 2
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

§ 800.165 Corrected certificates. ( a ) *General.* The accuracy of the statements and information shown on official certificates shall be verified by the individual whose name or signature is shown on the certificate, or by the authorized agent who affixed the name or signature. Errors found during this process shall be corrected according to this section.
( b ) *Who may correct.* Only official personnel or their authorized agents may make corrections, erasures, additions, or other changes to official certificates.
( c ) *Corrections prior to issuance* — ( 1 ) *Export certificates.* No corrections, erasures, additions, or other changes can be made to an export certificate. If any error is found prior to issuance, a new certificate shall be prepared and issued and the incorrect certificate marked “Void.”
( 2 ) *Other than export certificates.* No corrections, erasures, additions, or other changes shall be made to other than export certificates which involve identification, grade, gross, tare, or net weight. If errors are found, a new certificate shall be prepared and issued and the incorrect certificate marked “Void.” Otherwise, errors may be corrected provided that ( i ) the corrections are neat and legible,
( ii ) each correction is initialed by the individual who corrects the certificate, and
( iii ) the corrections and initials are shown on the original and all copies.
( d ) *Corrections after issuance* — ( 1 ) *General.* If errors are found on a certificate at any time up to a maximum of 1 year after issuance, the errors shall be corrected by obtaining the incorrect certificate and replacing it with a corrected certificate. When the incorrect certificate cannot be obtained, a corrected certificate can be issued superseding the incorrect one.
( 2 ) *Certification requirements.* The same statements and information, including permissive statements, that were shown on the incorrect certificate, along with the correct statement or information, shall be shown on the corrected certificate. According to this section and the instructions, corrected certificates shall show ( i ) the terms “Corrected-Original” and “Corrected-Copy;”
( ii ) a statement identifying the superseded certificate and the corrections;
( iii ) a statement indicating the superseded certificate was not surrended if the incorrect certificate was not surrendered; and
( iv ) a new serial number. In addition, the incorrect certificate shall be marked “Void” when submitted.
( e ) *Limitations.* Corrected certificates cannot be issued for a certificate that has been superseded by another certificate or on the basis of a subsequent analysis for quality.
( f ) *Use of superseded certificate prohibited.* As of the date of issuance of the corrected certificate, the superseded certificate will be void and shall not be used to represent the grain.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0580-0011)
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

B.B., a minor, by and )

through his mother and )

next friend, OWENA KNOWLES, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 3:06cv715-MHT

) 

PAWN CITY, INC., a )

corporation, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion to extend scheduling

order (Doc. No. 18) is denied. The deadlines set forth in

the uniform scheduling order (Doc. No. 9) were not only

accepted by the parties, they were suggested by the

parties in their Rule 26(f) report (Doc. No. 8).

DONE, this the 16th day of February, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 20 Filed 02/16/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### § 966.40 Expenses.

The committee is authorized to incur such expenses as the Secretary may find are reasonable and likely to be incurred during each fiscal period for its maintenance and functioning, and for such purposes as the Secretary, pursuant to this subpart, determines to be appropriate. Handlers shall share expenses upon the basis of a fiscal period. Each handler's share of such expense shall be proportionate to the ratio between the total quantity of tomatoes handled by him as the first handler thereof during a fiscal period and the total quantity of tomatoes handled by all handlers as first handlers thereof during such fiscal period.
Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 32 Filed 03/29/2007 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

** **

I, James W. Dolan,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of MAI Systems Corporation;

 

2. Based on my knowledge,this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisquarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

 

a)              designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

b)             evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as ofa date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “EvaluationDate”); and

 

c)              presentedin this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the EvaluationDate;

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a)              allsignificant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls whichcould adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors anymaterial weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b)             anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 

6. The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether ornot there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factorsthat could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of ourmost recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard tosignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

 
| Date: September 23, 2005 | By:    | /s/  James W. Dolan               |
|-------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                          |   | James W. Dolan                         |
|                          |   | Chief  Financial and Operating Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information derived from the quarterly
report on form 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       3,104,397
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          26,002
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 13,849,249
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     85,129,412
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,188,011
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             108,529,321
<DEPOSITS>                                  88,549,029
<SHORT-TERM>                                12,024,588
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            656,867
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,497,510
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,801,327
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             108,529,321
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,767,438
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              179,790
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                22,995
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             1,970,223
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             842,008
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,045,764
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          924,459
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   30,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                903,335
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                144,644
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     144,644
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   109,942
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.38
<LOANS-NON>                                  2,403,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   246,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              1,009,971
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,211,628
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   53,647
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,187,981
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,187,981
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0



</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

RICHARD MARSHALL, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06-cv-701-ID-CSC 

 ) 

CHRIS WEST, in his individual capacity, ) 

LASHUN HUTSON, in his individual ) 

capacity ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

MOTION TO WITHDRAW

COMES NOW Amanda Kay Morgan of the law firm of Webb & Eley, P.C., and moves 

this Court for permission to withdraw from the representation of Lowndes County, Alabama, 

Sheriff’s Deputies Chris West and Lashun Hutson, the Defendants in the above-styled action. As 

grounds for this Motion, the undersigned states that she will be no longer be employed with the 

firm of Webb & Eley, P.C. Daryl L. Masters will continue to represent Defendants Lowndes 

County, Alabama, Sheriff’s Deputies Chris West and Lashun Hutson.

WHEREFORE, Amanda Kay Morgan respectfully requests an order from this Court that 

releases her from representation of Defendants Lowndes County, Alabama, Sheriff’s Deputies 

Chris West and Lashun Hutson.

Respectfully submitted this the 10th day of January, 2007. 

s/Amanda Kay Morgan 

AMANDA KAY MORGAN, Bar No. ALL079 

Attorney for Defendants 

WEBB & ELEY, P.C. 

7475 Halcyon Pointe Drive (36117) 

P.O. Box 240909 

Montgomery, Alabama 36124 

Telephone: (334) 262-1850 

Fax: (334) 262-1889 

E-mail: amorgan@webbeley.com

Case 2:06-cv-00701-ID-CSC Document 10 Filed 01/10/2007 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that on January 10, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing with the 

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the 

following: Jay Lewis, Esq.

 s/Amanda Kay Morgan 

OF COUNSEL 

Case 2:06-cv-00701-ID-CSC Document 10 Filed 01/10/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### § 58.725 Trimming and cleaning.

The natural cheese shall be cleaned free of all non-edible portions. Paraffin and bandages as well as rind surface, mold or unclean areas or any other part which is unwholesome or unappetizing shall be removed.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

MAXIE MCNABB, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv664-MHT

)

SANDERS LEAD COMPANY, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

Upon consideration of plaintiff’s motion to compel (Doc. # 20), filed June 18, 2007,

and for good cause, it is

ORDERED that defendant file a response to the motion on or before close of business,

June 26, 2007.

Done, this 19th day of June, 2007.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00664-MHT-SRW Document 22 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 1 of 1
PATRICK LEE CARSON

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 5375

_____ ________________________/

Opinion filed February 12, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Taylor County

. Gregory S. Parker , Judge

.

Patrick Lee Carson, pro se

, Appellant.

No appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RO BERTS, CLARK, and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of 3DIcon Corporation (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the period  ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Martin
Keating, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section     1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities     Exchange Act of 1934;
      and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section     1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.





Date:  April
      15, 2009
                    By:
                    /s/
      Martin KeatingMartin Keating
                      Chief
      Executive
Officer
[875 NE2d 883, 844 NYS2d 165]

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Andre Collier, Appellant.

Decided September 18, 2007

*909APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Eugene P. Grimmick,*Troy, for appellant.

*Patricia A. DeAngelis, District Attorney,*Troy *(Anne L. Von Fricken Coonrad*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, defendant’s plea vacated and case remitted to County Court, Rensselaer County, for further proceedings on the information (s*ee People v Louree,*8 NY3d 541 [2007]).

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.
Subpart 747.5—Ocean Transportation by

U.S.-Flag Vessels

Parent topic: PART 747—TRANSPORTATION

747.507 Contract clauses.

Contracting officer must insert the clause at 752.247–70 in solicitations and contracts solely for

ocean transportation services, and in solicitations and contracts for goods and ocean transportation

services when the ocean transportation will be fixed at the time the contract is awarded. Contracting

officer must use (48 CFR) FAR 52.247–64 as prescribed in (48 CFR) FAR 47.507(a) in other

situations.
§ 959.52 Issuance of regulations. ( a ) The Secretary shall limit the handling of onions by regulations specified in this section whenever he finds from the recommendations and information submitted by the committee, or from other available information, that such regulations would tend to effectuate the declared policy of the act.
( b ) Such regulations may: ( 1 ) Limit in any or all portions of the production area the handling of particular grades, sizes, qualities or packs, or any combination thereof, of any or all varieties of onions during any period;
( 2 ) Limit the handling of particular grades, sizes, qualities, or packs of onions differently for different varieties, for different containers, for different portions of the production area, or any combination of the foregoing, during any period;
( 3 ) Limit the handling of onions by establishing, in terms of grades, sizes, or both, minimum standards of quality and maturity;
( 4 ) Fix the size, capacity, weight, dimensions, or pack of the container or containers which may be used in the packaging, transportation, sale, preparation for market, shipment, or other handling of onions;
( 5 ) Establish holidays by prohibiting throughout the entire production area, the packaging or loading, or both, of onions on Sundays;
( 6 ) Prohibit the packaging or loading, or both, of onions except during specified consecutive hours of any calendar day or days: *Provided,* That, any handler may, upon such notice to the committee as it may prescribe with approval of the Secretary, package or load onions during a different period in such day consisting of the same number of consecutive hours: *Provided further,* That any handler who, due to conditions specified in regulations established by the committee with the approval of the Secretary as being beyond a handler's reasonable control, is prevented for more than one of such consecutive hours from so packaging or loading onions may, in accordance with such regulations, obtain permission from the committee to package or load onions, or both, during a comparable number of additional hours in the same day or a later day as specified by the committee.
( c ) Regulations issued hereunder may be amended, modified, suspended, or terminated whenever it is determined: ( 1 ) That such action is warranted upon recommendation of the committee or other available information;
( 2 ) That such action is essential to provide relief from inspection, assessment, or regulations under paragraph (b) of this section for minimum quantities less than customary commercial transactions; or
( 3 ) That regulations issued hereunder no longer tend to effectuate the declared policy of the act.
( d ) No handler may handle onions that were packaged or loaded or both during any period when such packaging or loading or both was prohibited by any regulation issued pursuant to paragraphs (b)(5) or (6) of this section, except such onions as were exempted thereunder.
[26 FR 704, Jan. 25, 1961. Redesignated at 26 FR 12751, Dec. 30, 1961, as amended at 34 FR 6440, Apr. 12, 1969]