alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 10.1


                     Amendment No. 2 To Employment Agreement

         Amendment No. 2, dated as of May 1, 2006, by and between The Berkshire
Bank, a New York banking corporation ("Employer"), and David Lukens
("Employee"), to the Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2001, between Employer
and Employee (the "Employment Agreement").


                              W I T N E S S E T H:

               WHEREAS, Employer and Employee entered into the Employment
     Agreement; and

               WHEREAS, Employer and Employee wish to amend the terms of the
     Employment Agreement with respect to the term thereof.

               NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants herein
     contained, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:

               1. Paragraph 3 of the Employment Agreement shall be amended to
     read in its entirety as follows:

         "3.   Term of Employment. The employment by Employer of Employee
               pursuant hereto shall commence as of the date hereof and, subject
               to the provisions of paragraph 4 hereof, shall terminate on June
               30, 2008; provided, however, that Employee's employment hereunder
               shall be automatically renewed for up to three additional periods
               of one year each unless Employee or Employer notifies the other,
               not less than 60 days nor more than 90 days prior to the
               expiration of Employee's then current employment period, that he
               or it elects not to extend Employee's employment hereunder beyond
               the expiration date of the then current employment period."

               2. Except as otherwise amended hereby, the Employment Agreement
shall continue in full force and effect unamended from and after the date
hereof.

               IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. 2 has been executed and
     delivered by the parties hereto as of the date first above written.

                                                  THE BERKSHIRE BANK

                                                  /s/ Moses Krausz
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                  Moses Krausz
                                                  President and CEO

                                                  /s/ David Lukens
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                  David Lukens







                                       41
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000761236
<NAME>                        NATIONAL PROPERTIES INVESTMENT TRUST

       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              12/31/98
<PERIOD-START>                                 1/1/98
<PERIOD-END>                                   3/31/98
<CASH>                                              0
<SECURITIES>                                  400,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0
<PP&E>                                          6,545
<DEPRECIATION>                                  2,540
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                404,005
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          15,746
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                 11,791,190
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  400,005
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    0
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     0
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0 
<DISCONTINUED>                                (10,726)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,726)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
        


</TABLE>
Certifications

I, Susan Mills, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A and all reports on Form 10-D
       required to  be filed in respect of the period covered by this report
       on Form 10-K/A of Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-NC2 (the "Exchange
       Act periodic reports");

2.     Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
       whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
       to state a material fact necessary to  make the statements made, in
       light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
       misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
       information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
       covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
       reports;

4.     Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in
       this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
       in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its
       obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5.     All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
       for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
       assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
       securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
       Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
       have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
       disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
       described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
       10-K/A.

      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A. and New Century Mortgage Corporation.

Date: June 13, 2008


/s/ Susan Mills
---------------------------------
Susan Mills
Vice President
(Senior officer in charge of securitization of the Depositor)
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Phillip Gregory Crofton, Appellant

No. 06

- 12

- 00143

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the County Court at Law of Hunt County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No.
CR1101568 ). Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Carter and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial cou rt

. We note that the appellant, Phillip Gregory Crofton, has adequately indicated his inability

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

REND ERED APRIL 4, 2013
BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III
CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
§ 7.34 Retention of authority. ( a ) Nothing in this part will preclude the Secretary, the Administrator, or the Deputy Administrator from administering any or all programs, or exercising other functions delegated to the county committee, State committee, or any employee of such committees.
( b ) In exercising this authority, the Secretary, the Administrator, or the Deputy Administrator may designate for such period of time as deemed necessary a person or persons of their choice to be in charge with full authority to carry out the programs or other functions without regard to the normal duties of such committees or employees.
#### Richard L. Streeter et al., Respondents, v. Charles V. Jones, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and facts by reducing the judgment to $1,500, dismissing the third cause of action and deleting the provision in the judgment for interest, and as modified, affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. Memorandum: When the court polled the jury as to its verdict on the first cause of action it unanimously affirmed that it found for the plaintiffs in the sum of $1,500. It was error to have rejected this verdict and to have required further deliberation on the first cause of action. Plaintiffs in this action for damages for defendant’s breach of his agreement to purchase real property are not entitled to any recovery for alleged rental loss as claimed in the third cause of action and defendant’s motion to dismiss this cause of action should have been granted. It was improper to have submitted this issue to the jury and its verdict of $675 on this cause of action should be set aside. The trial court awarded interest on the unpaid purchase money and the alleged rental value. This was erroneous and the interest so awarded should be stricken from the judgment. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe Trial Term, in favor of plaintiffs in an action for breach of contract.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Del Veeehio, JJ.
1

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 2:06-mj-79-SRW 

)

HARRY EDWARD JONES, III ) 

GOVERNMENT'S MOTION FOR DETENTION HEARING

Comes now the United States of America, by and through Leura G. Canary, United States

Attorney for the Middle District of Alabama, and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3142(e) and (f) moves for

a detention hearing for the above-captioned defendant.

1. Eligibility of Cases

This case is eligible for a detention order because this case involves:

Crime of violence (18 U.S.C. § 3156)

Maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death

X 10 + year drug offense

Felony, with two prior convictions in the above categories

X Serious risk the defendant will flee

Serious risk of obstruction of justice

Felony involving a minor victim

Felony involving possession or use of a firearm or other destructive device

(as defined by 18 U.S.C. § 921) or any other dangerous weapon

Failure to register a sex offender (18 U.S.C. § 2250)

2. Reason For Detention

The Court should detain defendant because there are no conditions of release which will

reasonably assure:

Case 2:06-mj-00079-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

X Defendant's appearance as required

 X Safety of any other person and the community

3. Rebuttable Presumption

The United States will invoke the rebuttable presumption against defendant under Section

3142(e).

X Probable cause to believe defendant committed 10 + year drug offense or an

offense in which a firearm was used or carried under Section 924(c)

Previous conviction for "eligible" offense committed while on pretrial bond

A period of five years has not elapsed from defendant's conviction or release

from imprisonment for the offense described above

4. Time For Detention Hearing

The United States requests the Court conduct the detention hearing:

At the initial appearance

X After continuance of 3 days 

The Government requests leave of Court to file a supplemental motion with additional

grounds or presumption for detention should this be necessary.

Respectfully submitted this the 9th day of August, 2006.

LEURA G. CANARY 

United States Attorney

/s/ Christopher A. Snyder

CHRISTOPHER A. SNYDER

Assistant United States Attorney

Post Office Box 197

Montgomery, Alabama 36101-0197

334.223.7280

334.223.7135 fax

christopher.a.snyder@usdoj.gov

Case 2:06-mj-00079-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                               9
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,943
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        123
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,404
<PP&E>                                           5,235
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,064
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,635
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,658
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            23
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,825
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,635
<SALES>                                          3,137
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,138
<CGS>                                            2,571
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   256
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  29
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    281
<INCOME-TAX>                                        96
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                185
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       185
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .041
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .040
        

</TABLE>
1334.202 Integrated baseline reviews.

An Integrated Baseline Review shall be conducted when an Earned Value Management System is

required.

Parent topic: Subpart 1334.2 - Earned Value Management System
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1.000
<CASH>                                          16,427
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 3,300
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     90,776
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          31,208
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            31,489
<LOANS>                                        204,937
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,580
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 357,046
<DEPOSITS>                                     301,268
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              5,053
<LONG-TERM>                                     19,132
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,862
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,731
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 357,046
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  8,953
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,828
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   170
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                12,951
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,701
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,272
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,679
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      275
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  38
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,057
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,511
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,816
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,816
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .62
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.85
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,503
<LOANS-PAST>                                     2,387
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   662
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     77
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,750
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      459
<RECOVERIES>                                        14
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,580
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               932
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,648
        


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

BRIAN BONNER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) CASE NO. 3:06-cv-00715-MHT

)

INTERSTATE ARMS CORP., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

MOTION TO RECONSIDER

COMES NOW the plaintiff, BRIAN BONNER, and moves this Honorable Court 

to reconsider its Order of May 22, 2008 denying Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Extend 

Discovery Deadlines and states as follows:

1. This case involves two Chinese based defendants and the scheduling of 

depositions has been very difficult.

2. On February 22, 2008 defendant’s requested a sixty (60) day extension to name 

experts which the undersigned agreed to and this Court granted on February 29, 

2008. That placed the Defendants’ expert deadline on May 2, 2008, leaving only 

twenty-four (24) days to complete those depositions.

3. The matter presently in front of the Court is not a jury matter and is a bench trial 

pursuant to the Foreign Sovereigns Immunity Act.

Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 95 Filed 05/28/2008 Page 1 of 3
2

4. Dispositive motions have already been briefed in this matter and the request for 

extension of discovery will not affect the filing of dispositive motions and/or the 

trial of this case. The undersigned was remiss in failing to inform the Court of 

these factors in the original motion.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, plaintiff prays that this Court will

reconsider its Order of May 22, 2008 and grant Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Extend 

Discovery Deadlines.

/s/ David J. Hodge

DAVID J. HODGE

Of Counsel for Plaintiff

OF COUNSEL:

PITTMAN, DUTTON, KIRBY & HELLUMS, P.C.

2001 Park Place North

1100 Park Place Tower

Birmingham, Alabama 35203

(205) 322-8880

(205) 328-2711 facsimile

Nick Wooten, Esq.

WOOTEN & CARLTON, P.C.

P.O. Drawer 290

Lafayette, Alabama 36862

Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 95 Filed 05/28/2008 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on 28

th day of May, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing 

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such 

filing to the following: 

Todd M. Higey, Esq.

RICHARDSON CLEMENT, P.C.

200 Cahaba Park Circle, Suite 125

Birmingham, AL 35242

Attorney for Interstate Arms and Qiqihar Hawk

James C. Barton, Jr., Esq.

Alan D. Mathis, Esq.

JOHNSTON, BARTON, PROCTOR & POWELL, LLP

2900 Regions/Harbert Plaza

1901 6th Avenue North

Birmingham, AL 35203

Attorney for Norinco

/s/David J. Hodge _____

Of Counsel for Plaintiff

Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 95 Filed 05/28/2008 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 30 Filed 01/10/2007 Page 1 of 10
Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 30 Filed 01/10/2007 Page 2 of 10
Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 30 Filed 01/10/2007 Page 3 of 10
Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 30 Filed 01/10/2007 Page 4 of 10
Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 30 Filed 01/10/2007 Page 5 of 10
Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 30 Filed 01/10/2007 Page 6 of 10
Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 30 Filed 01/10/2007 Page 7 of 10
Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 30 Filed 01/10/2007 Page 8 of 10
Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 30 Filed 01/10/2007 Page 9 of 10
Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 30 Filed 01/10/2007 Page 10 of 10
Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 30-2 Filed 01/10/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cr-00179-MHT-CSC Document 19 Filed 12/15/06 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00179-MHT-CSC Document 19 Filed 12/15/06 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00179-MHT-CSC Document 19 Filed 12/15/06 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00179-MHT-CSC Document 19 Filed 12/15/06 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00179-MHT-CSC Document 19 Filed 12/15/06 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00179-MHT-CSC Document 19 Filed 12/15/06 Page 6 of 6
159 So.2d 285

#### STATE of Louisiana, through the DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS v. Leo CAILLIER.

No. 47027.

Jan. 20, 1964.

In re: State of Louisiana, through the Department of Highways, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Lafayette. 157 So.2d 274.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the district Judge and the Court of Appeal, the result is correct.

HAWTHORNE, J., is of the opinion the writ, should be granted.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3024 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3024

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain camel hair carded or combed.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 24, 2006

Mr. Lieberman (for himself and Mr. Dodd) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on certain camel hair carded or combed.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN CAMEL HAIR CARDED OR COMBED.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.12.22       Camel hair carded  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         or combed                                                          31/2009
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         5105.39.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```