alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.4



|     |  |                                                                                                                        
|---- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | Corporate Trust Services
 MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road Columbia, MD 21045
 Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380

Citibank, N.A.

388 Greenwich
Street

14th Floor

New York, New York 10013



|RE: | Annual Statement of Compliance for Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2012-6 Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2012-6
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Per the Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of January 1, 2014 (the Agreement), the undersigned, a duly authorized
officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Master Servicer (Wells Fargo), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the Reporting Period):

(a) A review of Wells Fargos activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such
officers supervision; and

(b) To the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of
its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

March 1, 2016



|              
|--------------
|LOGO          
|              
|Kristen Cronin
|Vice President



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Transition Report of Isdera North America, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period June 30, 2007, through December 31,
      2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the “Report”), I, Jing Jiang, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




/s/
                Jing JiangJing
                JiangChief
                Executive Officer, Chief Executive
                Officer





Dated:
      September 19 ,
      2008




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Isdera North America, Inc. and will be
      retained by Isdera North America, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# 5109.506 Procedures.

(d)(3)  The head of the contracting activity gives the approval or other direction as described in FAR 9.506(d)(3).  See Appendix GG for further delegation.

**Parent topic:**Subpart 5109.5 - Organizational and Consultant Conflicts of Interests
CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of DGT Corp.
      for
      the year ended March 31, 2007, I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
      knowledge, that:





|(1) | the
              Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of DGT Corp. for the year ended March
              31,
              2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of the
              Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(2) | the
              information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year
              ended March 31, 2007, fairly presents in all material respects, the
              financial condition and results of operations of DGT
              Corp..
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




By:
            /s/
                Jurgen BallmaierName:
            Jurgen
                BallmaierTitle:
            Principal
                Executive Officer and DirectorDate:
            June
                15, 2007By:
            /s/
                Wolfgang WagnerName:
            Wolfgang
                WagnerTitle:
            Principal
                Financial OfficerDate:
            June
                15, 2007
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of KINGDOM KONCRETE, INC. on Form 10-K/A for the periods ending December 31, 2013 and December
31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities
and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
of the Company.




/s/ EDWARD STEVENS

Edward Stevens
CEO

Dated:
April 7, 2014



/s/ EDWARD STEVENS

Edward Stevens

CFO

Dated:
 April 7, 2014




This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent
required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended.
# Subpart 912.3 - Solicitation Provisions and Contract Clauses for the Acquisition of Commercial Items

**Parent topic:**PART 912 - ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL ITEMS

## 912.302 Tailoring of provisions and clauses for the acquisition of commercial items.

(c) The waiver required by 48 CFR 12.302(c) shall be in writing and approved by the local procurement manager or individual appointed for that purpose by the local procurement manager.
§ 81.16 Refunds; joint and several liability. ( a ) In the event there is a failure to comply with any term, requirement, or condition for payment arising under the application of this part, and if any refund of a payment to AMS shall otherwise become due in connection with the application of this part, all payments made under this part to any producer shall be refunded to AMS together with interest.
( b ) All producers signing an application for payment as having an interest in such payment shall be jointly and severally liable for any refund, including related charges, that is determined to be due for any reason under the terms and conditions of the application of this part.
( c ) Interest shall be applicable to refunds required of any producer under this part if AMS determines that payments or other assistance were provided to a producer who was not eligible for such assistance. Such interest shall be charged at the rate of interest that the United States Treasury charges the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) for funds, as of the date AMS made benefits available. Such interest shall accrue from the date of repayment or the date interest increases as determined in accordance with applicable regulations. AMS may waive the accrual of interest if AMS was at fault for the overpayment.
( d ) Interest allowable in favor of AMS in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section may be waived when there was no intentional noncompliance on the part of the producer, as determined by AMS. Such decision to waive or not waive the interest shall be at the discretion of the Administrator or delegatee.
( e ) Late payment interest shall be assessed on all refunds in accordance with the provisions of, and subject to the rates prescribed for those claims which are addressed in 7 CFR part 792.
( f ) Producers must refund to AMS any excess payments, as determined by AMS, with respect to such application.
( g ) In the event that a benefit under this part was provided as the result of erroneous information provided by the producer, or was erroneously or improperly paid for any other reason, the benefit must be repaid with any applicable interest.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

GEORGE PARKER, #140922, )

 )

 Plaintiff, )

 )

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06-CV-649-WHA

 )

GWENDOLYN GIVENS, et al., )

 )

Defendants. )

O R D E R

In the document filed with this court on October 3, 2006 (Court Doc. No. 17), the

plaintiff seeks a de novo trial of his claims for relief. The court construes this request as a

motion for immediate disposition via de novo review. Upon consideration of the motion for

immediate disposition, and for good cause, it is

ORDERED that this motion be and is hereby DENIED. 

Done this 4th day of October, 2006.

/s/ Vanzetta Penn McPherson

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00649-WHA-WC Document 18 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3388 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3388

  To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain drawback 
                                claims.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 6, 2006

  Mr. Vitter introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain drawback 
                                claims.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIQUIDATION OR RELIQUIDATION OF CERTAIN DRAWBACK CLAIMS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act of 
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other provision of law, the Bureau of 
Customs and Border Protection shall, not later than 90 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, liquidate or reliquidate the 
drawback claims, as filed, that are described in subsection (c).
    (b) Payment of Amounts Due.--Any amounts due pursuant to the 
liquidation or reliquidation of the claims described in subsection (c) 
shall be paid not later than 90 days after the date of such liquidation 
or reliquidation.
    (c) Drawback Claims.--The drawback claims referred to in subsection 
(a) are the following:

 
                   Drawback claim number                     Filing date
 
AA6-0246691-1                                                  12/02/94
AA6-0246692-9                                                  11/30/94
AA6-0246668-9                                                  10/19/94
AA6-0302735-7                                                  03/21/97
AA6-0312303-2                                                  12/04/01
 

                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit
      31.1**




**CERTIFICATION**




I,
      Suresh
      Rajpal, certify that:




1.
      I have
      reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of TransTech Services Partners
      Inc..;




2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of
      a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
      made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
      not
      misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;




3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
      as
      of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;




4.
      The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules
      13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:




a)
      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;




b)
      Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
      period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




c)
      Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’s internal control
      over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent
      fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
      and




5.
      The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of
      registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
      functions):




a)
      All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and




b)
      Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting.




Date:
      April 3, 2008




/s/
      Suresh Rajpal





Suresh
      Rajpal,


Chief
      Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board
###### Editorial Note on Subpart A of Part 989

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 989 appear at 83 FR 53973, Oct. 26, 2018.

#### § 989.13 Processor.

*Processor* means any person who receives or acquires natural condition raisins, off-grade raisins, other failing raisins or raisin residual material and uses them or it within the area, with or without other ingredients, in the production of a product other than raisins, for market or distribution.

[32 FR 12158, Aug. 24, 1967; 33 FR 2983, Feb. 15, 1968, as amended at 42 FR 37201, July 20, 1977]
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 13-13239

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

Agency No. A087-997-015

NIKHILKUMAR HASMUKHBHAI PATEL,

 Petitioner,

versus

U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, 

 Respondent.

________________________

Petition for Review of a Decision of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

________________________

(March 28, 2014)

Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Nikhilkumar Hasmukhbhai Patel, a native and citizen of India, petitions for 

review of the order of removal and the decision affirming the denial of his 

Case: 13-13239 Date Filed: 03/28/2014 Page: 1 of 3 
2

application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the United 

Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading 

Treatment or Punishment. See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1158, 1231. The Board of Immigration 

Appeals affirmed the findings of the immigration judge that Patel’s accounts of 

past persecution were not credible and that he had failed to establish that he was 

likely to be tortured if he returned to India. We deny Patel’s petition.

Patel abandoned any challenge he might have made to the denial of his 

application for asylum. The immigration judge found Patel not credible based on 

his different accounts of persecution in his statements to border patrol agents and 

asylum officers, in his application, and in his testimony. Patel contested the 

adverse credibility ruling in his appeal to the Board, where he argued that he was 

“confused by many of the questions he was asked” about the inconsistencies, but in 

his petition, Patel focuses exclusively on the merits of his requests for asylum and 

withholding of removal. Patel abandoned his challenge to the adverse credibility 

ruling. See Sepulveda v. U.S. Atty. Gen., 401 F.3d 1226, 1228 n.2 (11th Cir. 

2005) (“When an appellant fails to offer argument on an issue, that issue is 

abandoned.”). 

 Substantial evidence supports the finding that Patel is unlikely to be 

tortured if he returns to India. The record is bereft of evidence that Patel would 

likely be tortured. See 8 C.F.R. § 208.16(c). Patel argues that he is entitled to 

Case: 13-13239 Date Filed: 03/28/2014 Page: 2 of 3 
3

relief based on information in his declaration, but we cannot consider a document 

that Patel prepared after the Board dismissed his appeal. We are required to 

“decide the petition only on the administrative record on which the order of 

removal is based.” 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(A).

We DENY Patel’s petition for review.

Case: 13-13239 Date Filed: 03/28/2014 Page: 3 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-30411

DAVID WEDGE, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

CAJUN DEEP FOUNDATIONS, L.L.C., 

 Defendant - Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:13-CV-1257

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, and BARKSDALE, and GRAVES, Circuit

Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Cajun Deep Foundations, L.L.C., was awarded summary judgment on 

David Wedge’s Jones Act claim under 46 U.S.C § 30104 et seq. Wedge claims

he showed he is entitled to seaman status. Chandris, Inc. v. Latsis, 515 U.S. 

347, 354 (1995); see also 46 U.S.C § 30104. Having reviewed the briefs, the record, 

and the applicable law, and essentially for the reasons stated by the district court, 

* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. 

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 10, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 14-30411 Document: 00512864207 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/10/2014
No. 14-30411

Wedge v. Cajun Deep Foundations, L.L.C., No. 13-1257, 2014 WL 1329830 (E.D. 

La. 2014), the judgment is AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 14-30411 Document: 00512864207 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/10/2014
§ 920.32 Procedure. ( a ) Eight members of the committee, or alternates acting for members, shall constitute a quorum and any action of the committee shall require the concurring vote of the majority of those present: *Provided,* That actions of the committee with respect to expenses and assessments, production and postharvest research, market research and development, or recommendations for regulations pursuant to §§ 920.50 through 920.55, of this part shall require at least eight concurring votes.
( b ) Committee meetings may be assembled or held by telephone, video conference, or other means of communication. The committee may vote by telephone, facsimile, or other means of communication. Votes by members or alternates present at assembled meetings shall be cast in person. Votes by members or alternates participating by telephone or other means of communication shall be by roll call; *Provided,* That a video conference shall be considered an assembled meeting, and votes by those participating through video conference shall be considered as cast in person.
[49 FR 39658, Oct. 10, 1984, as amended at 75 FR 37291, June 29, 2010; 79 FR 30445, May 28, 2014]
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 6 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### § 923.5 Cherries.

*Cherries* means all varieties of sweet cherries grown in the production area, classified botanically as Prunus avium.
6

and an Addendum to the FDOC, known as Appendix N, on March 2, 

2010. Appendix N to the FDOC has evolved into the AB 1318 

Tracking System submitted as part of this SIP revision. The CEC 

certification and the District’s FDOC require the Sentinel 

Energy Project to install and operate stringent emissions 

controls to reduce emissions of NOx, VOC, CO and PM10 to the 

lowest achievable emissions rates. 

B. Emission Offsets

Pursuant to section 173 of the CAA, new major stationary 

sources are required to provide offsetting emission reductions

for any non-attainment pollutants that continue to be emitted 

after operation of the most stringent emissions controls, if 

those levels exceed certain thresholds. 42 U.S.C. § 

7503(a)(1)(A). The District implements these requirements

through its NSR program in Regulation XIII, which EPA approved 

into the SIP in 1996 as meeting the requirements for CAA Section 

110, Part D. 61 FR 64291. 

The District estimated the amount of offsetting emission 

reductions that Sentinel must provide to comply with District 

Rule 1303 and CAA §173 for all non-attainment pollutants. For 

all pollutants other then PM10 and SOx, Sentinel has purchased 

Emission Reduction Credits (ERCs) on the open market. Those 

ERCs comply with Rule 1309.