alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2908 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2908

     To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on ethofumesate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 19, 2006

   Mr. Burr introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on ethofumesate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ETHOFUMESATE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.05.19 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to ethofumesate) is amended by 
striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

 ______________________________

JEREMIAH W. GREEN *

Plaintiff, *

 v. * 2:06-CV-667-WKW

 

AJA ROBERTS *

Defendant. *

 ______________________________

ORDER ON MOTION

Before the court is Plaintiff’s pleading filed January 18, 2007 styled as a Motion for

Clarification or Reconsideration of the Magistrate Judge’s Order Regarding “Doe”

Defendants. Plaintiff requests clarification or reconsideration of a court order entered August

17, 2006 “regarding the further involvement of the several ‘Doe’ Defendants’ name[d] in

Plaintiff’s original claim, as amended.” Upon consideration of the motion for clarification,

it is 

ORDERED that the motion (Doc. No. 40) be and is hereby GRANTED. 

Plaintiff is advised that this case is proceeding against Defendant Sue Roberts,

Warden of the Elmore County Jail. As noted in the court’s July 18, 2006 order, the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure do not provide for fictitious party practice as it is incompatible with

federal procedure. (See Doc. No. 5.) Thus, the “Doe” defendants listed in the complaint, i.e.,

Corrections Officers - John, Jack, Jim & Jane Doe and County Attorney John Doe, were

Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 43 Filed 01/26/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

never considered properly named parties to this action. 

To the extent Plaintiff’s January 18, 2006 pleading may be construed as a Motion to

Reconsider the court’s November 15, 2006 order denying his November 13, 2006 motion for

leave for discovery to identify multiple “Doe” defendants, and for good cause, it is 

ORDERED that the motion (Doc. No. 40 ) be and is hereby GRANTED. 

It is further

ORDERED that on or before February 12, 2007 Defendant file a response to

Plaintiff’s Declaration submitted as an attachment to his August 11, 2006 amended complaint

(Doc. No. 7) wherein he describes various “John Doe Correctional Officers” he came in

contact with on February 21/22, 2006. If Defendant is able to identify the “ Doe Correctional

Officers/Employees” based on the descriptions contained in Plaintiff’s August 11, 2006

Declaration, she should include such information with her response. 

The Clerk is DIRECTED to furnish a copy of Document Number 7, including

attachments, to Defendant and counsel of record. 

Done, this 26th day of January 2007.

 /s/Wallace Capel, Jr. 

WALLACE CAPEL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 43 Filed 01/26/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 61 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 1 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 61 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 2 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 61 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 3 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 61 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 4 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 61 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 5 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 61 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 6 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 61 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 7 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 61 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 8 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 61 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 9 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 61 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 10 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 61 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 11 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 61 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 12 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 61 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 13 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 61 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 14 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 61 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 15 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 61 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 16 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 61 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 17 of 17
Searched for **http://bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/parip.pdf**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/parip.pdf**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
52.232-3 Payments under Personal Services

Contracts.

As prescribed in 32.111(a)(3), insert the following clause, appropriately modified with respect to

payment due dates in accordance with agency regulations, in solicitations and contracts for personal

services:

Payments under Personal Services Contracts (Apr 1984)

The Government shall pay the Contractor for the services performed by the Contractor, as set forth

in the Schedule of this contract, at the rates prescribed, upon the submission by the Contractor of

proper invoices or time statements to the office or officer designated and at the time provided for in

this contract. The Government shall also pay the Contractor-

(a) A per diem rate in lieu of subsistence for each day the Contractor is in a travel status away from

home or regular place of employment in accordance with Federal Travel Regulations (41 CFR 101-7)

as authorized in appropriate Travel Orders; and

(b) Any other transportation expenses if provided for in the Schedule.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.232 [Reserved]
LEGAL02/30203489v1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

JIMMY CASSADY, as Administrator of the 

Estate of ORBIE CASSADY, deceased, et al., 

)

)

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

Civil Action No. 

2:06-CV-679-LES-CSC

PACTIV CORPORATION and LOUISIANAPACIFIC CORPORATION, )

)

)

Defendants. )

)

DEFENDANT LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORPORATION’S 

MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT SIX

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) and 7(b), Defendant Louisiana-Pacific Corporation 

(“Louisiana-Pacific”) moves this Court for an Order dismissing Count Six of Plaintiff’s 

Complaint. As set forth in the accompanying Memorandum of Law, Count Six fails to state a 

valid claim under the Alabama Extended Manufacturer’s Liability Doctrine. Therefore, 

pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), Count Six must be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which 

relief may be granted. 

Case 2:06-cv-00679-LES-CSC Document 9 Filed 12/22/2006 Page 1 of 4
2

LEGAL02/30203489v1

Respectfully submitted this 22nd day of December, 2006.

/s/Bernard Taylor

Bernard Taylor (admitted pro hac vice)

Douglas S. Arnold (admitted pro hac vice)

Orlyn O. Lockard, III (admitted pro hac vice)

Counsel for Defendant Louisiana-Pacific

Corporation

OF COUNSEL:

ALSTON & BIRD LLP

One Atlantic Center

1201 West Peachtree Street, N.W.

Atlanta, Georgia 30309

Tel: (404) 881-7000

Fax: (404) 881-7777

bernard.taylor@alston.com

doug.arnold@alston.com

skip.lockard@alston.com

ADDITIONAL COUNSEL:

Dennis R. Bailey 

ASB No. 4845-I71D

R. Austin Huffaker 

ASB NO. 3422-F55R

RUSHTON, STAKELY, JOHNSON, & GARRETT, P.A.

184 Commerce Street

Post Office Box 270

Montgomery, AL 36101

Tel: (334) 206-3100

Fax: (334) 262-6277

drb@rsjg.com (Bailey)

rah2@rsjg.com (Huffaker)

Case 2:06-cv-00679-LES-CSC Document 9 Filed 12/22/2006 Page 2 of 4
3

LEGAL02/30203489v1

Laura Proctor

ASB 1504-R54L

Associate General Counsel

Louisiana-Pacific Corporation

414 Union Street North, Suite 2000

Nashville, Tennessee 37219

Tel: (615) 986-5878

Fax: 1-866-741-5091

laura.proctor@lpcorp.com

Case 2:06-cv-00679-LES-CSC Document 9 Filed 12/22/2006 Page 3 of 4
4

LEGAL02/30203489v1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 22nd day of December, 2006, I filed the foregoing via the 

CM/ECF system which will send notice of said filing to the following:

W. Eason Mitchell

Gregory A. Cade

Fred R. DeLeon

W. Lee Gresham, III

Robert Leslie Palmer

Mark R. TerMolen

John C. Berghoff, Jr.

Matthew C. Sostrin

John A. Earnhardt

H. Thomas Wells, Jr.

Richard Elder Crum

/s/Orlyn O. Lockard, III

Of Counsel

Case 2:06-cv-00679-LES-CSC Document 9 Filed 12/22/2006 Page 4 of 4
52.235 [Reserved]

Parent topic: Subpart 52.2 - Text of Provisions and Clauses
#### Ameriquest Mortgage Company, Respondent, v Steven J. Bellon et al., Appellants. Daniel Lenchner, Nonparty Appellant.

[815 NYS2d 193]

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, nonparty Daniel Lenchner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Nelson, J.), dated April 5, 2005, which denied his motion to compel the referee who conducted the foreclosure sale to execute and deliver a deed to the subject premises to him.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the Supreme Court properly denied his motion to compel the referee who conducted the foreclosure sale to execute and deliver a deed to the subject premises to him. The terms of sale specifically apprised potential bidders that the successful bid would be subject to any arrangements made prior to the sale between the plaintiff and the defendant borrowers for reinstatement of the delinquent note and mortgage which were “at this time unknown to the Referee,” and that in such event the sale would be deemed null and void. It is undisputed that arrangements for reinstatement of the delinquent note and mortgage were made, and that the plaintiff received a certified check from the defendant borrowers in the sum required for reinstatement prior to the foreclosure sale. Accordingly, pursuant to the subject provision of the terms of sale, the sale was null and void. Prudenti, P.J., Santucci, Krausman and Dillon, JJ., concur.
225.7003-1 Definitions.

As used in this section—

“Alloy” means a metal consisting of a mixture of a basic metallic element and one or more metallic,

or non-metallic, alloying elements.

(1) For alloys named by a single metallic element (e.g., titanium alloy), it means that the alloy

contains 50 percent or more of the named metal (by mass).

(2) If two metals are specified in the name (e.g., nickel-iron alloy), those metals are the two

predominant elements in the alloy, and together they constitute 50 percent or more of the alloy (by

mass).

“Automotive item”—

(1) Means a self-propelled military transport tactical vehicle, primarily intended for use by military

personnel or for carrying cargo, such as—

(i) A high-mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicle;

(ii) An armored personnel carrier; or

(iii) A troop/cargo-carrying truckcar, truck, or van; and

(2) Does not include—

(i) A commercially available off-the-shelf vehicle; or

(ii) Construction equipment (such as bulldozers, excavators, lifts, or loaders) or other self-propelled

equipment (such as cranes or aircraft ground support equipment).

“Commercial derivative military article” means an item acquired by the Department of Defense that

is or will be produced using the same production facilities, a common supply chain, and the same or

similar production processes that are used for the production of articles predominantly used by the

general public or by nongovernmental entities for purposes other than governmental purposes.

“Electronic component” means an item that operates by controlling the flow of electrons or other

electrically charged particles in circuits, using interconnections of electrical devices such as

resistors, inductors, capacitors, diodes, switches, transistors, or integrated circuits. The term does

not include structural or mechanical parts of an assembly containing an electronic component and

does not include any high performance magnets that may be used in the electronic component.

“High performance magnet” means a permanent magnet that obtains a majority of its magnetic

properties from rare earth metals (such as samarium).

“Produce” means—

(1) Atomization;

(2) Sputtering; or
(3) Final consolidation of non-melt derived metal powders.

“Specialty metal” means—

(1) Steel—

(i) With a maximum alloy content exceeding one or more of the following limits: manganese, 1.65

percent; silicon, 0.60 percent; or copper, 0.60 percent; or

(ii) Containing more than 0.25 percent of any of the following elements: aluminum, chromium,

cobalt, molybdenum, nickel, niobium (columbium), titanium, tungsten, or vanadium;

(2) Metal alloys consisting of—

(i) Nickel or iron-nickel alloys that contain a total of alloying metals other than nickel and iron in

excess of 10 percent; or

(ii) Cobalt alloys that contain a total of alloying metals other than cobalt and iron in excess of 10

percent;

(3) Titanium and titanium alloys; or

(4) Zirconium and zirconium alloys.

“Steel” means an iron alloy that includes between .02 and 2 percent carbon and may include other

elements.

Parent topic: 225.7003 Restrictions on acquisition of specialty metals.
#### § 956.113 Fiscal period.

Pursuant to § 956.13, *fiscal period* shall mean the period beginning January 1 and ending December 31 of each year.

[68 FR 57326, Oct. 3, 2003]
EXHIBIT 31.1

Section 302 Certification

I, Parker H. Petit, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of MiMedx Group, Inc.;
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: April 27, 2012



/s/: Parker H. PetitParker H. PetitChief Executive Officer
903.1004 Contract clauses.

(b)(2)(ii) Insert the DOE Web site address http://ig.energy.gov/hotline.htm in paragraph (b)(3) of the

48 CFR 52.203-14 clause, Display of Hotline Poster(s).

Parent topic: Subpart 903.10 - Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct
#### In the Matter of Javier R., an Infant. Robert R., Appellant; Melinda R., Respondent, et al., Respondent.

Submitted October 15, 2007;

decided October 18, 2007

Reported below, 43 AD3d 1.

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Randall S. Carmel, Esq., 53 Jackson Avenue, Syosset, New York 11793 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
#### Edward W. James et al., Appellants, v J. I. Sopher & Co., Inc., et al., Respondents.

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on February 25,1980, unanimously dismissed as moot (see *Longo v New York City Educational Constr. Fund,*78 AD2d 610). Respondents shall recover of appellants $75 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Appeal from order of said court entered on March 12, 1980 unanimously dismissed as nonappealable, without costs and without disbursements. No opinion. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Birns, Fein, Ross and Bloom, JJ.
§ 930.84 Proceedings after termination. ( a ) Upon the termination of the provisions of this part, the then functioning members of the Board shall, for the purpose of liquidating the affairs of the Board, continue as trustees of all the funds and property then in its possession, or under its control, including claims for any funds unpaid or property not delivered at the time of such termination.
( b ) The said trustees shall: ( 1 ) continue in such capacity until discharged by the Secretary;
( 2 ) from time to time account for all receipts and disbursements and deliver all property on hand, together with all books and records of the Board and of the trustees, to such person as the Secretary may direct; and
( 3 ) upon the request of the Secretary, execute such assignments or other instruments necessary or appropriate to vest in such person full title and right to all of the funds, property, and claims vested in the Board or in the trustees pursuant to this part.
( c ) Any person to whom funds, property, and claims have been transferred or delivered, pursuant to this section, shall be subject to the same obligations imposed upon the Board and upon the trustees.
(September 29, 1980)

#### Rose Bass, Appellant, v City of New York, Respondent.

a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals, on the ground of inadequacy, from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered April 17, 1979, which is in her favor, in the principal sum of $2,250, upon a jury verdict (following an apportionment of the $4,500 verdict as to damages at 50% against plaintiff and 50% against defendant). Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted limited to the issue of damages only, with costs to abide the event, unless, within 30 days after service upon defendant of a copy of the order to be made hereon, together with notice of entry thereof, defendant shall serve and file in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to increase the verdict as to damages to $10,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in favor of plaintiff in the principal sum of $5,000 (following apportionment). In the event defendant so stipulates, then the judgment, as so amended and increased, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The verdict as to damages was inadequate to the extent indicated. Hopkins, J. P., O’Connor, and Weinstein, JJ., concur; Mangano, J., dissents and votes to affirm the judgment.
Date: October 20, 2009 

To: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0011 

From: Kristin Parrish Sroka 

Subject: NSPS Subpart J Review: Meeting Minutes for April 17, 2009, Meeting Between 

the U.S. EPA and Representatives of HOVENSA LLC and John Zink Company 

LLC 

Introduction

On April 17, 2009, representatives of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

and their contractor (RTI International) participated in a stakeholder meeting with 

representatives of HOVENSA LLC (HOVENSA) and John Zink Company LLC (John Zink). 

The names and affiliations of the participants are included in Attachment 1. The purpose of the 

meeting was to discuss co-fired process heaters. Attachments 2 through 4 contain the 

presentation slides used by HOVENSA and John Zink representatives during the meeting. 

Attachment 5 provides correspondence between the EPA and HOVENSA regarding meeting 

planning and background information. 

Discussion

The discussion mainly centered around the presentation slides in Attachment 2. 

Additional points made by the HOVENSA representatives are described below. 

The HOVENSA representatives noted that the discussion in the Black and Veatch White 

Paper attached to their public comments (EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0011-0308) regarding gas guns 

and oil guns is not relevant to HOVENSA; the HOVENSA co-fired process heaters do not have 

that type of burner. The burners in the HOVENSA process heaters are designed to fire either oil 

or gas, but only one type of fuel is fired at a time in each burner. The John Zink representative 

noted that the burners in a co-fired process heater are about 50 percent larger than burners 

designed to fire just one type of fuel. 
Attachment 1 

Participants in April 17, 2009, Meeting 

Industry Representatives

Vince D’Ippolito, HOVENSA 

Chris Colman, HOVENSA 

Dick Waibel, John Zink 

U.S. EPA Representatives

KC Hustvedt 

Brenda Shine 

RTI International (EPA contractor)

Jeff Coburn 

Kristin Parrish
### 2449 - 1 (Adopted May 2, 2008)

Rule 2449. Control of Oxides of Nitrogen Emissions from Off-Road Diesel

Vehicles

The provisions of Article 4.8, Chapter 9, Title 13 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR), Section 2449.3, in effect June 15, 2008, wer e adopted in full by the South Coast Air Quality Management District on May 2, 2008 thro ugh the “opt-in” provision provided in the regulation and were made part of th e Rules and Regulations of the South Coast Air Quality Management District.

The provisions of this Regulation apply to the owne r of any off-road diesel vehicle as described in Section 2449.3(b) operating in the Sou th Coast Air Quality Management District. Upon the District’s issuance of a solici tation for applications for funding, fleet owners subject to Section 2449.3 shall submit appli cations for funding, in accordance

with the Rule 2449 Administrative Guidelines develo ped to implement Section 2449.3.

Title 13, Chapter 9 Motor Vehicles – Off-Road Vehicles and Engines Poll ution

Control Devices

Section 2449.3 Surplus Off-Road Opt-In for NOx (SOON) Program

(13 CCR 2449.3, June 15, 2008) (AQMD Adopted May 2 , 2008)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             683
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1377
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      17045
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                             514
<DEPRECIATION>                                     504
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   23268
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                          10933
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                        8532
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     23268
<SALES>                                          12817
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 12901
<CGS>                                            10840
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    12626
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    275
<INCOME-TAX>                                       101
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                174
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       174
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19
<FN>
<F1>  The Company does not present a classified balance sheet
</FN>
        

</TABLE>