alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.79


 


Equity Transfer Agreement - Amendment 3


 


Transferor (Party A): Ambow Education
Management (Hong Kong) Limited


 


Transferee (Party B): Beijing Shengkehua
Technology Co., Ltd.


 


The First Transferred Entity (Party C):
Beijing Ambow Online Software Co., Ltd. (“Ambow Online”)


 


The Second Transferred Entity (Party D):
Suzhou Wenjian Venture Investment Management Consulting Co., Ltd. (“Suzhou Wenjian”)


 


(Collectively as the “Parties”)


 


According to the equity transfer agreement
which was signed on August 31, 2017 among the Parties, the following supplementary terms are agreed and for all parties to abide
by:


 


Consideration under term 2 of the master transfer
agreement are revised as following:


		2.1	As of the date of object equity interest transfer, Party A has a direct equity investment in Party
C in the amount of RMB 222,540 thousand and an indirect investment in Party D in the amount of RMB 1,000 thousand. At the same
time, Party A owns other net assets of Party C in the aggregate amount of RMB 210,229 thousand and other net assets of Party D
in the amount of RMB 8,198 thousand. As a result Party A owns total net assets of Party C and Party D in the amount of RMB 441,967
thousand.



		2.2	As of the date of object equity interest transfer, Party A has payables to Party C in the aggregate
amount of RMB 579,499 thousand.



		2.3	As agreed by Party A and Party B, Party A offset the payables to Party C with Party C’s net
assets attributable to Party A as of the date of object equity interest transfer in the aggregate amount of RMB 441,967 thousand.
After the offset, the payable balance due to Party C by Party A was RMB 137,532 thousand. The payment terms of such payables shall
be agreed by amendment between Party A and Party B.



		2.4	After offsetting as described in 2.3, considering the net assets of Party C and Party D attributable
to Party A which used for the transfer is RMB nil, the consideration that Party B would pay to Party A is RMB nil.



 




     


     


    

 


	PARTY A: Ambow Education Management (Hong Kong) Limited
	 
	Authorized Representative:	 
	Signature:	/s/
	Date: December 21, 2017	 
	 
	Party B: Beijing Shengkehua Technology Co., Ltd.
	Authorized Representative:	 
	Signature:	/s/
	Date: December 21, 2017	 
	 
	Party C: Beijing Ambow Online Software Co., Ltd.
	Authorized Representative:	 
	Signature:	/s/
	Date: December 21, 2017	 
	 
	Party D: Suzhou Wenjian Venture Investment Management Consulting Co., Ltd.
	Authorized Representative:	 
	Signature:	/s/
	Date: December 21, 2017
# 5145.605 Inventory disposal reports.

See AFARS PGI 5145.605 for instructions                associated with Inventory disposal reports.

**Parent topic:**Subpart 5145.6 - Reporting, Reutilization, and Disposal
Case 1:06-cr-00188-DRB Document 1 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cr-00188-DRB Document 1 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Joseph DePaulo, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
report on Form 10-K of SLM Student Loan Trust 2012-7 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my
knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the
distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required under this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer
and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.
Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as
indenture trustee.

Date: March 29, 2013



|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ JOSEPH DEPAULO                                                   
|Joseph DePaulo                                                       
|President and Chief Financial Officer (Senior Securitization Officer)
|SLM Funding LLC
906.501 Requirement.       The Secretary of Energy and NNSA Administrator have delegated the authority for appointment of the agency and contracting activity competition advocates to the respective DOE and NNSA Senior Procurement Executives. The Senior Procurement Executives have redelegated authority to the Head of the Contracting Activity to appoint contracting activity competition advocates.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 906.5 - Competition Advocates
Exhibit 23.1

MOORE & ASSOCIATES, CHARTERED
  ACCOUNTANTS AND ADVISORS
  ------------------------
     PCAOB REGISTERED


          CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
          --------------------------------------------------------


We consent to the use, in the statement on Form 10K of Reshoot & Edit, of our
report dated September 30, 2008 on our audit of the financial statements of
Reshoot & Edit as of August 31, 2008 and August 31, 2007, and the related
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years
ended August 31, 2008 and August 31, 2007 and since inception on August 23,
2006 through August 31, 2008, and the reference to us under the caption
"Experts."


/s/ Moore & Associates, Chartered
---------------------------------
    Moore & Associates Chartered
    Las Vegas, Nevada
    November 4, 2008


               6490 West Desert Inn Rd, Las Vegas, NV 89146
                      (702)253-7499 Fax (702)253-7501

<PAGE>
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION





Each
      of
      the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of China
      Industrial Waste Management Inc. (the "Company"), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1)  The
      Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended
      September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:
                November
                20, 2006/s/ Jinqing DongJinqing
                DongChief
                Executive
                Officer  /s/ Jinqing DongJinqing
                  DongChief
                  Financial
                  Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      China Industrial Waste Management Inc. and will be retained by China Industrial
      Waste Management Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or
      its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3504 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3504

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Public Health Service Act to prohibit the solicitation or 
 acceptance of tissue from fetuses gestated for research purposes, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fetus Farming Prohibition Act of 
2006''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF THE SOLICITATION OR ACCEPTANCE OF TISSUE FROM 
              FETUSES GESTATED FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES.

    Section 498B of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 289g-2) is 
amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsections (c) and (d) as subsections 
        (d) and (e), respectively;
            (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following:
    ``(c) Solicitation or Acceptance of Tissue From Fetuses Gestated 
for Research Purposes.--It shall be unlawful for any person or entity 
involved or engaged in interstate commerce to--
            ``(1) solicit or knowingly acquire, receive, or accept a 
        donation of human fetal tissue knowing that a human pregnancy 
        was deliberately initiated to provide such tissue; or
            ``(2) knowingly acquire, receive, or accept tissue or cells 
        obtained from a human embryo or fetus that was gestated in the 
        uterus of a nonhuman animal.'';
            (3) in paragraph (1) of subsection (d), as so redesignated, 
        by striking ``(a) or (b)'' and inserting ``(a), (b), or (c)''; 
        and
            (4) in paragraph (1) of subsection (e), as so redesignated, 
        by striking ``section 498A(f)'' and inserting ``section 
        498A(g)''.

            Passed the Senate July 18, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3504

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend the Public Health Service Act to prohibit the solicitation or 
 acceptance of tissue from fetuses gestated for research purposes, and 
                          for other purposes.
```
#### § 986.93 Effective time.

The provisions of this part and of any amendment thereto shall become effective at such time as the Secretary may declare, and shall continue in force until terminated in one of the ways specified in § 986.94.
Editorial Note on Part 4290
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 4290 appear at 85 FR 16522, Mar. 24, 2020.

§ 4290.1220 Requirement for RBIC to file financial statements at the time of request for a draw. ( a ) If you submit a request for a draw against your Leverage commitment more than 90 days following your submission of an annual SBA Form 468 or a SBA Form 468 (Short Form) or other USDA-approved form(s), you must: ( 1 ) Give the Agency a financial statement on Form 468 (Short Form) or other USDA-approved form(s), and
( 2 ) File a statement of no material adverse change in your financial condition since your last filing of SBA Form 468 or other USDA-approved form(s).
( b ) You will not be eligible for a draw if you are not in compliance with this § 4290.1220.
[69 FR 32204, June 8, 2004, as amended at 76 FR 80224, Dec. 23, 2011]
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Authority:

7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 810.305 Special grades and special grade requirements.

*Garlicky canola.* Canola that contains more than two green garlic bulblets or an equivalent quantity of dry or partly dry bulblets in approximately a 500 gram portion.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0483

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

KEVIN CHARLES WALLA,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 5, 2023, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 28 2023

07/28/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0483
###### Editorial Note on Subpart A of Part 989

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 989 appear at 83 FR 53973, Oct. 26, 2018.

#### § 989.2 Act.

*Act* means Public Act No. 10, 73d Congress, as amended, and as re-enacted and amended by the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (sections 1-19, 48 Stat. 31, as amended; 7 U.S.C. 601-674).

[42 FR 37201, July 20, 1977]
EXHIBIT
32.2







CERTIFICATION
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO


SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(b)


OR
RULE 15d-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with Amendment No. 2 to
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Tennessee Valley Authority (the “Company”)
for the year ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kimberly S. Greene, Chief
Financial Officer and Executive Vice President, Financial Services of the
Company, certify, for the purposes of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule
15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350
of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) the Report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.














/s/
      Kimberly S. GreeneKimberly
      S. GreeneChief
      Financial Officer and ExecutiveVice
      President, Financial ServicesDecember
      10,
2008
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of KINGDOM KONCRETE, INC. on Form 10-K for the
periods ending December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his
knowledge:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





/s/ EDWARD STEVENS
              Edward
      Stevens CEO
              Dated:
      March 26, 2009
              
              /s/
      EDWARD STEVENS
              Edward
      Stevens
              CFO
              Dated:
      March 26, 2009




This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
§ 930.58 Grower diversion privilege. ( a ) *In general.* Any grower may voluntarily elect to divert, in accordance with the provisions of this section, all or a portion of the cherries which otherwise, upon delivery to a handler, would become restricted percentage cherries. Upon such diversion and compliance with the provisions of this section, the Board shall issue to the diverting grower a grower diversion certificate which such grower may deliver to a handler. Any grower diversions completed in accordance with this section, but which are undertaken in districts subsequently exempted by the Board from volume regulation under § 930.52(d), shall qualify for diversion credit.
( b ) *Eligible diversion.* Grower diversion certificates shall be issued to growers only if the cherries are diverted in accordance with the following terms and conditions or such other terms and conditions that the Board, with the approval of the Secretary, may establish. Diversion may take such of the following forms which the Board, with the approval of the Secretary, may designate: uses exempt under § 930.62; nonhuman food uses; or other uses, including diversion by leaving such cherries unharvested.
( c ) *Application/mapping.* The Board, with the approval of the Secretary, shall develop rules and regulations providing for the diversion of cherries by growers. Such regulations may include, among other things: ( 1 ) The form and content of applications and agreements relating to the diversion, including provisions for supervision and compensation; and
( 2 ) Provisions for mapping areas in which cherries will be left unharvested.
( d ) *Diversion certificate.* If the Board approves the application it shall so notify the applicant and conduct such supervision of the applicant's diversion of cherries as may be necessary to assure that the cherries have been diverted. After the diversion has been accomplished, the Board shall issue to the diverting grower a diversion certificate stating the weight of cherries diverted. Where diversion is carried out by leaving the cherries unharvested, the Board shall estimate the weight of cherries diverted on the basis of such uniform rule prescribed in rules and regulations as the Board, with the approval of the Secretary, may recommend to implement this section.
[61 FR 49942, Sept. 24, 1996, as amended at 67 FR 51715, Aug. 8, 2002; 77 FR 33306, June 6, 2012]
Case 2:06-cv-00721-MHT-TFM Document 3 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00721-MHT-TFM Document 3 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 2 of 2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk January 18, 2013

s0115 

# Order

January 18, 2013

146382

SC: 146382

In re M. T. TUCKER, Minor

. COA: 308915

Washtenaw CC Family Division:

2009

- 000060

- NA

_______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 20, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

H ATHAWAY

, J ., not participating.
§ 789.42 Directives. ( a ) A directive is an official action that requires a person to take or refrain from taking certain actions in accordance with the provisions of the directive.
( b ) A person must comply with each directive issued. However, a person may not use or extend a directive to obtain any items from a supplier, unless expressly authorized to do so in the directive.
( c ) A priorities directive takes precedence over all DX-rated orders, DO-rated orders, and unrated orders previously or subsequently received, unless a contrary instruction appears in the directive.
( d ) An allocations directive takes precedence over all priorities directives, DX-rated orders, DO-rated orders, and unrated orders previously or subsequently received, unless a contrary instruction appears in the directive.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.49
AMENDMENT NO. 3 
TO 
THE PROGRESSIVE CORPORATION 
2003 DIRECTORS EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 
The Progressive Corporation 2003 Directors Equity Incentive Plan, as previously amended (the “Plan”), is hereby mended as follows: 
1. The second sentence of the first paragraph of Section 2 of the Plan is hereby deleted, and the following is substituted in its place: 
“The Committee shall consist of not less than two directors of the Company, all of whom shall be Non-Employee Directors.” 
2. Except as expressly modified hereby, the terms of the Plan shall be unchanged. 
This Amendment will be effective as of April 20, 2012. 
	
	
	 

	/s/ Charles E. Jarrett

	Charles E. Jarrett

	Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         788,756
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,326,529
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,343,687
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,495,213<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        3,309,795
<PREFERRED>                                  1,548,000
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,343,687
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            25,094,698
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               24,797,913
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,239,447
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (942,662)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (942,662)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (978,070)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.44)
<FN>
<F1>UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET
</FN>


</TABLE>
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 7 A0 12 9 . ROBERT DALTON PHI LLI PS v

. MELI NDA I VY PHI LLI PS.

Ro b ert Ph i l l i p s fi l ed t h i s ap peal fro m t h e s u p e r i o r co u rt ’ s fi n al d ecree o f d i v o rce. Th e Su p rem e Co u rt , h o wev er, h as g en eral ap p el lat e ju ri s d i ct i o n o v e r d i v o rce an d al im o n y cas e s

. See Ga. Co n s t

. of 1 9 8 3 , Art

. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (6 ). Acco rd in g ly , t h i s a p p l i cat i o n i s h ereb y TRANSFERRED t o t he Su p rem e Co u rt fo r d i s p o s i t i on

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 08/31/2016 August 31, 2016