alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3288 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3288

  To suspend temporarily the duty on handheld electronic can openers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 26, 2006

   Mr. Allen introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on handheld electronic can openers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HANDHELD ELECTRONIC CAN OPENERS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.85.11        Handheld electronic     Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           can openers (provided                                             31/2009          ''
                           for in subheading                                                                   .
                           8509.80.00)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-30717

Summary Calendar

 

SOLOMON B. GUILLORY,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

TERRY TERRELL, Warden,

Allen Correctional Center,

Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CV-420-P

- - - - - - - - - -

February 28, 1997

Before GARWOOD, DeMOSS and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Solomon B. Guillory, Louisiana state prisoner #120347,

appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for writ

of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He argues that

the state trial court’s reasonable doubt instruction was

unconstitutional, that the state trial court’s instruction to the

jury on the law of principals was unconstitutional and deprived
No. 96-30717

- 2 -

him of his right to due process, that he was denied equal

protection of the laws because other criminal defendants have

previously been granted relief on the same errors which he has

alleged, that he received ineffective assistance of counsel

because his attorney failed to object to the state trial court’s

reasonable doubt instruction, and that he was denied due process

by a cumulation of errors committed during the course of his

trial. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Further, because Guillory failed to adequately brief his claim

that he was denied due process by a cumulation of errors

committed during the course of his trial, this issue is deemed

abandoned on appeal. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25

(5th Cir 1993). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court

is AFFIRMED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

 _______________________________

JAMES ARTHUR CULBRETH, #214 203 *

Petitioner, *

 v. * 2:06-CV-690-MEF

 

GWENDOLYN MOSLEY, WARDEN, et al., *

Respondents. *

 _______________________________

ORDER ON MOTION

Pending before the court is Petitioner’s Motion for Extension of Time to File

Objections to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Upon review of the motion, the

court concludes that it should be granted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner’s Motion for Extension of Time to file Objections (Doc. No. 6), is

GRANTED; and

2. Petitioner IS GRANTED an extension from August 28, 2006 to September 7,

2006 to file his objections to the August 14, 2006 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

DONE, this 29th day of August, 2006.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00690-MEF-SRW Document 7 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 1 of 1
## FILED

2006 May-11 PM 03:26 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA Case 3:06-cv-00691-WHA-WC Document 1 Filed 05/08/2006 Page 1 of 11Case 3:06-cv-00691-WHA-WC Document 1 Filed 05/08/2006 Page 2 of 11Case 3:06-cv-00691-WHA-WC Document 1 Filed 05/08/2006 Page 3 of 11Case 3:06-cv-00691-WHA-WC Document 1 Filed 05/08/2006 Page 4 of 11Case 3:06-cv-00691-WHA-WC Document 1 Filed 05/08/2006 Page 5 of 11Case 3:06-cv-00691-WHA-WC Document 1 Filed 05/08/2006 Page 6 of 11Case 3:06-cv-00691-WHA-WC Document 1 Filed 05/08/2006 Page 7 of 11Case 3:06-cv-00691-WHA-WC Document 1 Filed 05/08/2006 Page 8 of 11Case 3:06-cv-00691-WHA-WC Document 1 Filed 05/08/2006 Page 9 of 11Case 3:06-cv-00691-WHA-WC Document 1 Filed 05/08/2006 Page 10 of 11Case 3:06-cv-00691-WHA-WC Document 1 Filed 05/08/2006 Page 11 of 11
§ 905.400 Interpretation of certain provisions. ( a ) In interpreting the provisions of paragraph (d) of § 905.52, the limitation on shipment of any variety of fruit regulated pursuant to paragraph (a)(3) of that section, which was prepared for market during the effective period of such regulation, shall not be deemed to apply to shipment of such variety which was prepared for market incidentally as part of a lot packed for export and shipped following the period of regulation.
( b ) Prior to shipment of any variety of fruit so prepared, the handler shall provide the Citrus Administrative Committee or its designated agent a copy of the shipping manifest applicable to such shipment with a notation thereon that the fruit was packed incidentally as part of a lot packed for export.
[54 FR 46597, Nov. 6, 1989]
Case 2:06-cv-00632-WKW-DRB Document 5 Filed 10/02/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00632-WKW-DRB Document 5 Filed 10/02/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00632-WKW-DRB Document 5 Filed 10/02/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00632-WKW-DRB Document 5 Filed 10/02/2006 Page 4 of 4
# Subpart 5234.2 - EARNED VALUE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

**Parent topic:**Part 5234 - MAJOR SYSTEM ACQUISITION

## 5234.203 Solicitation provisions and contract clause.

   Notwithstanding DFARS 234.203 and in accordance with DASN(AP&B) memo entitled, “Earned Value Management Applicability Determination Delegation and Policy”, dated 8 January 2021, contracting officers shall not apply Earned Value Management (EVM) to Level of Effort (LOE) CLINs or solicitations or contracts that have an approved EVM Applicability Determination (AD) for non-applicability. A copy of the approved EVM AD shall be included in the contract file.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

BARBARA M. JEFFERS and )

JOAN K. CRAIG, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) Civil Action Number:

) CV 3:06CV685-CSC

RUSSELL COUNTY BOARD OF )

EDUCATION and CHARLES )

NACRELLI, )

)

Defendants. )

)

DEFENDANT CHARLES NACRELLI’S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

COMES NOW the Defendant, Charles Nacrelli, (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant”),

and moves this Court to extend the time for filing its Stipulation of Dismissal for fourteen (14)

days. As grounds therefore, Defendant states the following:

1. Defendant was awaiting the disbursement of settlement funds in a suit filed

against Farmers Insurance Company which were received by Defendant on March

17, 2008. 

2. A fourteen (14) day extension is necessary for Defendant to efficiently receive and

disburse said funds as necessitated by the mediation of the above styled cause of

action.

Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 64 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 1 of 2
2

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the Defendant, Charles Nacrelli,

respectfully requests this Honorable Court grant its Motion to Extend Time to File Stipulation of

Dismissal.

Respectfully submitted

/s/Matthew C. Williams 

MATTHEW C. WILLIAMS

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 17th day of March, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing

with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to

the following: 

W. Don Eddins, Esq. 

Attorney at Law

337 E Magnolia Avenue, Suite #3

Auburn, Alabama 36830-3133

doneddins@charter.net

Attorney for Plaintiffs,

Barbara M. Jeffers and Joan K. Craig

Sydney S, Smith, Esq.

Smith & Smith

1503 Broad Street

Phenix City, Alabama 36867

ssmith4843@aol.com

Attorney for Defendant,

Russell County Board of Education

/s/ Matthew C. Williams 

OF COUNSEL

Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 64 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

TERRY DEESE, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

v. ) CASE NO.: 1:06-CV-643 MHT 

 ) 

CHAMPION ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., ) 

 ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

 COMES NOW, the undersigned, W. Scott Simpson, and hereby enters an appearance as 

additional counsel for the Defendants, Champion Home Builders Co., Inc. and Homes of 

Legend, Inc. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 /s W. Scott Simpson ___________ 

 W. Scott Simpson (ASB-3319-S65W) 

OF COUNSEL: 

SIMPSON LAW FIRM, P.C. 

3288 Morgan Drive, Suite 112 

Birmingham, Alabama 35216 

Telephone: (205) 822-3422 

Facsimile: (205) 822-3618 

E-mail: ws.simpson@mindspring.com 

Gregory S. Ritchie, Esq. (ASB-8193-H68G) 

Richard S. Walker, Esq. (ASB-8719-L70R) 

RITCHEY & RITCHEY, P.A. 

P. O. Drawer 590069 

Birmingham, Alabama 35259-0069 

Telephone: (205) 271-3100 

Facsimile: (205) 271-3111 

Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 28 Filed 01/30/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of Court by using 

CM/ECF system which will send a notice of electronic filing to the following parties on this the 

30th day of January, 2007. 

Jere L. Beasley, Esq. 

W. Daniel Miles, III, Esq. 

C. Gibson Vance, Esq. 

Beasley, Allen, Crow, 

Methvin, Portis & Miles, P.C. 

Post Office Box 4160 

Montgomery, Alabama 36103 

and I hereby certify that I have mailed by United States Postal Service the document to the following 

non-CM/ECF participants: 

Lawrence J. Anderson, Esq. 

Jon D. Pels, Esq. 

Pels, Anderson & Lee, LLC 

4833 Rugby Avenue, Fourth Floor 

Bethesda, MD 20814 

 /s W. Scott Simpson________________ 

 Of Counsel 

Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 28 Filed 01/30/2007 Page 2 of 2
§ 981.4 Almonds and almond biomass. ( a ) *Almonds* means (unless otherwise specified) all varieties of almonds (except bitter almonds), either shelled or unshelled, grown in the State of California, and, for the purposes of research includes almond biomass.
( b ) *Almond biomass* means the hulls, shells, and skins of harvested almonds and woody biomass derived from almond trees (*e.g.,* tree limbs, bark, prunings).
[89 FR 37968, May 7, 2024]
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

VFS LEASING CO., )

)

PLAINTIFF, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:06CV638-SRW

VS. )

)

G. F. KELLY, INC d/b/a KELLY )

TRUCKING; and GUY KELLY, ) 

)

DEFENDANTS. )

ANSWER

Comes now the defendants G. F. Kelly, Inc. D/b/a KellyTrucking and Guy Kelly and hereby

file the following Answer:

 1. Admitted.

 2. Admitted.

 3. Admitted.

 4. Admitted.

 5. Defendants do not have sufficient information to admit or deny the allegations made

in this paragraph.

 6. Defendants admit that the “Guaranty” was executed. The legal effect of the terms of

the document is a question for the court.

 7. Admitted.

 8. Admitted.

 9. Admitted.

 10. Admitted.

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 1 of 4
2

 11. Admitted.

 12. Admitted.

 13. Admitted.

 14. Admitted.

 15. Admitted.

 16. Admitted.

 17. Admitted.

 18. Admitted.

 19. Admitted.

20. Admitted.

21. Admitted.

 22. Admitted.

 23. Admitted.

 24. Denied.

25. Denied.

 26. Denied.

 27. Denied.

 28. Admitted.

 30. See responses to previous paragraphs.

31. Admitted.

32. Denied.

33. See responses to previous paragraphs.

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 2 of 4
3

34. Admitted

35. Denied.

36. See responses to previous paragraphs.

37. Denied.

38. Denied.

Affirmative Defenses

 1. Except to the extent expressly admitted herein, the allegations of the Complaint are

denied.

 2. Plaintiff’s damages are limited to the extent that it has failed to mitigate same.

 3. Defendant denies that plaintiff is entitled to recover against it.

 

 Respectfully Submitted, 

/s/ James H. Starnes 

James H. Starnes, Attorney for Defendants 

OF COUNSEL:

P. O. Box 590003

Birmingham, AL 35259-0003

(205) 320-0800

/s/ S. Sanford Holliday 

S. Sanford Holliday, Attorney for Defendants 

OF COUNSEL:

P. O. Box 727

Roanoke, AL 36274

(334)863-2717

DEFENDANTS DEMAND TRIAL BY STRUCK JURY ON ALL ISSUES

/s/ James H. Starnes 

James H. Starnes, Attorney for Defendants

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 3 of 4
4

 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have the foregoing pleading electronically using the CM/ECF

system which will electronically serve a copy of same on all counsel of record on this the 11th

day of August, 2006 as follows:

David B. Hall

Jason Asbell

BAKER DONALDSON 

420 North 20 Street, Suite 1600 th

Birmingham, AL 35203

 

/s/ James H. Starnes 

 OF COUNSEL

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 4 of 4
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, December 16, 2010 at 2 p.m.

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), (8), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.

Commissioner Walter, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session.

The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, December 16, 2010 will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;

Regulatory matters regarding financial institutions; and

Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: December 9, 2010.

Elizabeth M. Murphy,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-31393 Filed 12-9-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

May 4, 2007

NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE

To: ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD

Case Style: Bowden v. Mission Petroleum Carriers et al 

Case Number: 2:06-cv-00665-WHA

Referenced Pleading: Response to discovery

Docket Entry Number: 46

The referenced pleading was electronically filed on ***May 3, 2007*** in this case and is not

in compliance with the local rules and/or administrative procedures of this court. 

******This pleading is discovery and is not allowed pursuant to Local Rule 5.1 NON-FILING

OF CIVIL DISCOVERY.

The pleading is hereby STRICKEN from the record and the parties are instructed to disregard

the entry of this pleading on the court’s docket. Parties should be aware that the striking of

this entry does not affect their responsibilities as to the discovery process.

Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 47 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 1 of 1
§ 925.65 Effect of termination or amendment. Unless otherwise expressly provided by the Secretary, the termination of this part or any regulation issued pursuant to this part, or the issuance of any amendment to either thereof, shall not: ( a ) Affect or waive any right, duty, obligation, or liability which shall have arisen or which may thereafter arise in connection with any provision of this part or any regulation issued under this part; or
( b ) Release or extinguish any violation of this part or any regulation issued under this part; or
( c ) Affect or impair any rights or remedies of the Secretary or any other person with respect to any such violation.
#### NEW YORK & KENTUCKY CO., Respondent, v. KNECHT, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 3, 1906.)

Action by the New York & Kentucky Company against Fred Knecht.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
3.906 Remedies.

(a) The HCA is the designee.

Parent topic: SUBPART 3.9 — WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTIONS FOR CONTRACTOR

EMPLOYEES
# 1/22/16, 1:52 PM sUAS Registration - Registration Certificate

Page 1 of 1 https://registermyuas.faa.gov/restricted#/certificate 

# Federal Aviation Administration

Small UAS Certi fi cate of Registration

ISSUED: 

## 01/22/2016 EXPIRES: 

## 01/21/2019 CERTIFICATE HOLDER: 

## Michael DeLano

UAS CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 

## FA39XR7MME For U.S. citizens, permanent residents, and certain non-citizen U.S. corporations, this document constitutes a Certi fi cate of Registration. For all others, this document represents a recognition of ownership. For all holders, for all operations other than as a model aircraft under sec. 336 of Pub. L. 112-95, additional safety authority from FAA and economic authority from DOT may be required. Safety guidelines for fl ying your unmanned aircraft:

Fly below 400 feet Never fl y near other aircraft Keep your UAS within visual line of sight Keep away from emergency responders Never fl y over stadiums, sports events or groups of people Never fl y under the in fl uence of drugs or alcohol Never fl y within 5 miles of an airport without fi rst contacting air tra ffi c control and airport authorities
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

EASTERN DIVISION 

GREAT SOUTHERN WOOD * 

PRESERVING, INC., * 

 * 

 Plaintiff, * 

 * 

v. * Civil No. 1:06-cv-00708-CSC 

 * 

AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE * 

CO., AIG, AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL * 

UNDERWRITERS CORP., AMERICAN * 

INTERNATIONAL MARINE AGENCY, * 

 * 

 Defendants. * 

DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

 Defendants American Home Assurance Co., AIG, American International Underwriters 

Corp. and American International Marine Agency hereby move this Court for entry of summary 

judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as there are no disputed 

issues of material fact and Defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Defendants 

have also filed herewith a brief and evidentiary exhibits in support of this motion. 

 s/Blane H. Crutchfield_________________ 

BLANE H. CRUTCHFIELD (CRUTB4243) 

LOUIS C. NORVELL (NORVL4585) 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

 American Home Assurance Company, AIG, 

 American International Underwriters Corporation, 

 and American International Marine Agency 

OF COUNSEL: 

HAND ARENDALL, L.L.C. 

P. O. Box 123 

Mobile, AL 36601-0123 

Tel: (251) 432-5511 

Fax: (251) 694-6375 

Case 1:06-cv-00708-CSC Document 21 Filed 05/30/2007 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that I have on this 30th day of May, 2007 served the foregoing pleading 

on counsel of record via electronic notice or by United States mail first class, postage prepaid. 

Kenneth A. Dowdy, Esq. 

Lusk, Lusk, Dowdy & Caldwell, P.C. 

2101 Highland Ave. 

Suite 410 

Birmingham, AL 35205 

Leslie Ann Caldwell, Esq. 

Lusk, Lusk, Dowdy & Caldwell, P.C. 

2101 Highland Ave. 

Suite 410 

Birmingham, AL 35205 

 

s/Blane H. Crutchfield_________________ 

Case 1:06-cv-00708-CSC Document 21 Filed 05/30/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### § 760.800 Applicability.

This part sets forth the terms and conditions for the 2005-2007 Crop Disaster Program (2005-2007 CDP). CDP makes emergency financial assistance available to producers who have incurred crop losses in quantity or quality for eligible 2005, 2006, or 2007 crop years due to disasters as determined by the Secretary under provisions of Title IX of the U.S. Troop Readiness, Veterans' Care, Katrina Recovery, and Iraq Accountability Appropriations Act, 2007 (Pub. L. 110-28). However, to be eligible for assistance, the crop subject to the loss must have been planted or existed before February 28, 2007, or, in the case of prevented planting, would have been planted before February 28, 2007.
239.7407 Type of contract.    (S-90) When acquiring telecommunications services using the Inquiry/Quote/Order (IQO) process or Communication Service Authorizations (CSAs), refer to the IQO Acquisition Deskbook located at https://www.ditco.disa.mil/hq/deskbooks.asp          .       (S-91) A CSA change order or discontinue modification may be issued unilaterally if an equitable adjustment in contract/order price or delivery terms has been agreed upon and documented in advance (i.e., completion notice/report, bilateral modification to IDIQ contract). If an equitable adjustment in contract/order price or delivery terms has been agreed upon and documented in advance, only the unilateral CSA change order or discontinue modification is required. The contractor shall acknowledge the change order or discontinue modification as required by the contract. **Parent topic:** SUBPART 239.74 —TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES