alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3303 

To suspend temporarily the duty on food slicers and shredders with topmounted motors and replaceable mixing bowls. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 26, 2006 

Mr. ALLEN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on food slicers and shredders with top-mounted motors and replaceable mixing 

bowls. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FOOD SLICERS AND SHREDDERS WITH TOP4 MOUNTED MOTORS AND REPLACEABLE MIX5 ING BOWLS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•S 3303 IS 

‘‘ 9902.85.14 Food slicers and shredders with topmounted motors and replaceable mixing 

bowls (provided for in subheading 

8509.40.00) ............................................. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheets and statements of operations found on pages 2-4 of the
Company's Form 10-QSB for the year to date, and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          10,369
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  514,082
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     94,085
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               690,522
<PP&E>                                         877,966
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,467,523
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          794,528
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         1,568
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (83,728)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,467,523
<SALES>                                      2,938,378
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,938,378
<CGS>                                        1,841,962
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,841,962
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               982,344
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (93,533)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,985
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,985
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

</TABLE>
Case 2:06-mj-00073-DRB Document 2 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

 _____________________________

JEREMIAH W. GREEN *

Plaintiff, *

 v. * 2:06-CV-667-WKW

 

AJA ROBERTS, et al., *

Defendants. *

 _____________________________

ORDER

On March 26, 2007 Plaintiff filed a pleading in which he advises the court of a service

address for Luke Reaves. The CLERK of the court is hereby DIRECTED to serve Luke

Reaves at the Millbrook Jail, 3841 Grandview Road, Millbrook, Alabama 36054 with a copy

of this order together with a copy of Document Numbers 1, 7, 49, & 50. Accordingly, it is

 ORDERED that Luke Reaves shall file an answer and written report to the complaint

on or before May 7, 2007 in accordance with the court’s February 28, 2007 order of

procedure (Doc. No. 50). 

Plaintiff is advised that the court will not continue to monitor this case to ensure that

each of the named defendants has been served. This is Plaintiff's responsibility. Plaintiff is

cautioned that if service is not perfected on Defendant Reaves he will not be a considered

party to this cause of action and this case will proceed only against those named defendants

on whom service has been perfected. 

Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 54 Filed 03/27/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

Done, this 27th day of March 2007.

 /s/Wallace Capel, Jr. 

WALLACE CAPEL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 54 Filed 03/27/2007 Page 2 of 2
Notification of the Interim Final FIP – Signed by Lisa Jackson , Notification of the Interim Final FIP – Signed by Lisa Jackson ,EPA 

Administrator

40CFR Part CFR Part CFR Part49 – Federal Implementation Plan for Oil and Natural Gas 

Production Facilities , Production Facilities ,Fort Berthold Indian Reservation Fort Berthold Indian Reservation Fort Berthold Indian Reservation (Mandan,Hidatsa and Hidatsa and Hidatsa and 

Arikara Nations , Arikara Nations,or MHA Nation or MHA Nation or MHA Nation ),North Dakota North Dakota North Dakota . (as defined in § as defined in § as defined in § 49.152

Carl Daly Carl Daly to: Jennifer.Head 08/02/2012 11:16 AM

Cc: Jodell.mizoue, Lisa.decker, Deirdre Rothery, Kate Fay, Sara 

Laumann

This message is digitally signed.

Ms. Head,

This email is to inform you that Lisa Jackson, Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection 

Agency, has signed an interim final rule “Federal Implementation Plan for Oil and Natural Gas Federal Implementation Plan for Oil and Natural Gas Federal Implementation Plan for Oil and Natural Gas 

Production Facilities , Production Facilities ,Fort Berthold Indian Reservation Fort Berthold Indian Reservation Fort Berthold Indian Reservation (Mandan,Hidatsa and Arikara Nations Hidatsa and Arikara Nations Hidatsa and Arikara Nations ,or MHA 

Nation) Nation),North Dakota North Dakota North Dakota ,”(Fort Berthold Oil and Gas FIP)a federal rule that applies to oil and gas 

operations producing from the Bakken Pool on the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation in North Dakota . 

The FIP requires owners and operators of oil and natural gas production facilities to reduce emissions of 

volatile organic compounds emanating from well completions , recompletions, and production and storage 

operations. The agency proposed a Reservation-specific FIP concurrently with this interim final rule .

Please find, attached, a copy of the notification sent by certified mail to the primary contact for WPX 

Energy:

WPX_Actual Notice of FIP Letter 8-1-12.pdf

And a copy of the interim final rule:

Fort Berthold FIP NFR_8-1-12 (interim final rule) for ACTUAL NOTICE LETTERS.pdf

If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me or Deirdre Rothery, Chief 

Air Permitting, Monitoring and Modeling Unit at rothery.deirdre@epa.gov or 303-312-6431.

Thank you,

Carl Daly, Director, Air Program

303-312-6416
Order entered November 15, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00760-CV

CITY OF DALLAS, Appellant

V.

LYNN PELTIER, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-20-04958-D

ORDER

Before the Court is appellee’s November 10, 2021 unopposed motion for an 

extension of time to file her brief. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to 

December 8, 2021.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG

JUSTICE
Case 2:06-mj-00079-SRW Document 2 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 1 of 1
Subpart 1319.2 - Policies.    **Parent topic:** PART 1319 - SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS1319.201 General policy.       (a) The DOC Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization (OSDBU) is headed by a Director who shall report and be responsible to the Deputy Secretary on matters of policy and legislative requirements.          (b) Each Contracting Office shall appoint Small Business Specialists to assist the HCA in effectively implementing the small business programs, including achieving program goals.1319.202 Specific policies.       Procurement actions valued above $100,000 will be reviewed by the Director, OSDBU, or designee for the purpose of making recommendations for solicitation/award under FAR Part 19.1319.202-70 Small business set-aside review form.       Form CD 570, Small Business Set-Aside Review, shall be submitted for approval to the Operating Unit Counsel Small Business Specialist, and forwarded to the OSDBU for approval. If applicable, the Form CD 570 will be submitted to the SBA Procurement Center Representative (PCR) for review. The Form CD 570 is required for:          (a) Procurement actions valued above $100,000;          (b) Modifications to existing contracts that add new work valued over $550,000 or that increase the total contract cost to over $550,000;          (c) Consolidation of two or more procurement requirements for goods and services.
1'/; -""i(

c.' ': f

,

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

iI-- '0'

S'!- ! ' /

I

---gNEOFMON~NA---------

'....

',.-'

MARC RACICOT, GOVERNOR

(406) 444-6697

fax (406),444-6836

November 5, 1999

Donald Barry \;

'tr

Assistant Secretary Of Fish, Wildlife and Parks

(3153-mail stop 3156)

U.S. Department ofthe Interior,

Main Interior Building

1849 C Street NW

Washington, DC 20240-0001

Mr. Barry:

, - ( . , r

LEE METCALF BUILDING

1520 EAST SIXTH AVENUE

PO BOX 200901

HELENA, MONTANA 59620-0901

This letter, in accordance with Federal Regional Haze Regulations (40 CFR Part 51, specifically §

51.308), formally identifies that Deborah Skibicki, Air Quality Specialist and Area Source State

Implementation Plan (SIP) Coordinator with the Montana Department of Environmental Quality, will be

the contact person for Federal Land Managers of Montana's mandatory Class I Federal areas with respect

to regional haze issues. These issues may include but are not limited to: identification of visibility

impairment in any mandatory Class I Federal areas and identification of elements for inclusion in the

visibility monitoring strategy. Montana's mandatory Class I Federal areas under the jurisdiction ofthe

U.S. Department of Interior are listed in the attachment.

The State of Montana welcomes input from the Federal Land Managers regarding regional haze issues,

and looks forward to their comments. Deborah Skibicki, the designated contact, can be reached at (406)

444-7916 (phone), (406) 444-6836 (fax), at the above address, or by email at dskibicki@state.mt.us.

Sincerely,

7'.w<~

Mark Simonich, Director

Department of Environmental Quality

Attachment

cc: Chris Shaver, Chief- Air Resources Division National Park Service

Sandra Silva, Chief- Air Quality Branch U.S Fish and Wildlife Service

IIDEO_MET _I'RIISH RIUN ITSHARIRPI'ISkibickilldentiryconlactdoi doc

'AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER'

-------
Montana's mandatory Class I Federal areas

under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Department ofInterior

Glacier National Park

Medicine Lake Wilderness Area (National Wildlife Refuge)

Red Rock Lake Wilderness Area (National Wildlife Refuge)

UL Bend Wilderness Area (Charles M. Russell National Wildlife Refuge)

Yellowstone National Park f'

\IDEO_MET_. PRIIS HRIUN ITSHARIRPPlSkibickilldentifycontactdoi.doc

Attachment
* Pursuant to 5th C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the

limited circumstances set forth in 5th C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-31207

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RAUL ENRIQUE MATUS,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

(97-CR-50014-1)

November 20, 1998

Before JOHNSON, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Raul Enrique Matus appeals his guilty plea conviction of possession

with intent to distribute over 100 k ilograms of marijuana.

Specifically, Matus argues that the district court erred in denying his

motion to suppress the drugs found in his vehicle because (1) the

officer did not have probable cause to stop the defendant, (2) the

officer exceeded the scope of the traf fic stop by asking to search the

vehicle, and (3) the defendant’s consent to search was not given

voluntarily.

This Cou rt reviews a “district court’s findings of fact for clear2

error and its conclusions of law de novo

, viewing the evidence in the

light most favorable to the government, unless inconsistent with the

trial court’s findings or found to be cl early erroneous after

considering the evidence as a whole.” U .S. v. Zucco

, 71 F.3d 188, 190

(5th Cir. 1995); s ee also United States v. Cooper

, 43 F.3d 140, 144

(5th Cir. 1995). Whether consent was given voluntarily is a question

of fact which will only be reversed if clearly erroneous. S ee Zucco

,

71 F.3d at 191; U nited States v. Shabazz

, 993 F.2d 431, 438 (5th Cir.

1993). When the evidence includes credibility assessments, the standard

is applied even more deferentially. See Zucco , 71 F.3d at 191.

Matus first contends that he was stopped in violation of the Fourth

Amendment because the officer did not have probable cause. After a

careful revie w of the transcript from the suppression hearing, we hold

that the district court was not clearly erroneous in finding that the

officer had probable cause to believe that Matus had executed an illegal

lane change.

Matus next argues that the officer exceeded the scope of the stop

by requesting to search the vehicle. The record shows that this request

was made while the detention was still justified by the facts justifying

the initial stop. S ee Zucco

, 71 F.3d at 190-91; S habazz

, 993 F.2d at

438.

Finally, Matus contends that the district cou rt erred in denying

the motion to suppress because his consent was not voluntarily given.

Specifically, Matus argues that he did not freely consent because he

could not understand English, and was not presented with an explanation

in Spanish. The record shows that in making a credibility assessment3

bas ed on oral testimony given at the hearing, the district court found

that Matus could understand English. Under the clearly erroneous

standard articulated by this Court in matters of credibility, the

district court did not err.

AFFIRMED.
Subpart 5216.2 - FIXED-PRICE CONTRACTS

Parent topic: Part 5216 - TYPES OF CONTRACTS

5216.202-90 Firm-fixed-price contracts.

Consultation with DPC is required prior to the use of a firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract for a sole

source acquisition with a value greater than $500 million for U.S. or combined U.S./FMS

requirements for a major system as defined in FAR 2.101. This consultation should use the Peer

Review process provided at NMCARS 5201.170. The HCA shall notify DASN(P) by email at

RDAJ&As.fct@navy.mil with the subject “[Activity Name] Consultation with DPC for a FFP Contract

over $500M" seven days prior to requesting the review from DPC.
###### Editorial Note on Part 982

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 61 FR 17559, Apr. 22, 1996.

#### § 982.6 Grower.

*Grower* is synonymous with *producer* and means any person engaged, in a proprietary capacity, in the commercial production of hazelnuts.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

B.B., a minor, by and )

through his mother and )

next friend, OWENA KNOWLES, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 3:06cv715-MHT

) 

PAWN CITY, INC., a )

corporation, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDERED

It is ORDERED that the motion for leave to file

amended complaint (Doc. No. 40) is granted. The court

assumes that defendants have no objection to the

allowance of the amendment; however, if they do, they

must file the objection within seven (7) days from the

date of this order.

DONE, this the 9th day of July, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 45 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 1 of 1
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 1 , 2012.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 12

- 00851

- CR NO. 14

- 12

- 00852

- CR NO. 14

- 12

- 0085 3

- CR

CHRISTOPHER MARIO TU RTUR , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 182nd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . 1335396 , 1335456, & 1350337



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant entered guilty plea s to three counts of theft . In accordance with the terms of a plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant to
confinement for eighteen months in the State Jail Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed pro se notice s of ap peal. We dismiss the appeal s

.2

The trial court entered certification s of the defendant’s right to appeal in which the
court certified that th ese are plea bargain case s , and the defendant has no right of appeal.
See T ex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial court’s certification s are included in the record s on appeal. See T ex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). The record s support the trial court’s
certification s

. See Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal s

.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Christopher, and Jamison

. Do Not Publish

— T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENSACOLA DIVISION 

IN RE SKANSKA USA CIVIL 

SOUTHEAST INC. AND 

SKANSKA USA, INC. AS 

OWNERS OF THE BARGE KS 

5531, PRAYING FOR 

EXONERATION FROM OR 

LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 

ADMIRALTY RULE 9(H)

CIVIL ACTION NO.

3:20-CV-05980 

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 

LACEY COLLIER

MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

HOPE THAI CANNON

NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned counsel for the Claimants, 

hereby gives notice of his unavailability from October 7, 2021 through October 15, 

2021 scheduled in consideration of the previously set trial date. The undersigned 

has also been apprised that Robb Hyde, counsel for United States will be filing a 

notice of unavailability for October 14 and 15 later today. As the undersigned has 

been involved in all aspects of this matter from the beginning and is among the Lead 

Trial Counsel for Claimants, undersigned respectfully requests consideration of the 

same when deciding whether hearings or other matters be scheduled during this time. 

Case 3:20-cv-05980-LC-HTC Document 1281 Filed 09/01/21 Page 1 of 2
2

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ E. Samuel Geisler

E. SAMUEL GEISLER, FL Bar # 83817

Aylstock, Witkin, Kreis & Overholtz, PLLC

17 East Main Street, Second floor

Pensacola, Florida 32502

Office: (850) 202-1010

sgeisler@awkolaw.com

baylstock@awkolaw.com

sallyteam@awkolaw.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 1th day of September, 2021, I 

electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of Court by using the CM/ECF 

system which will send a notice of electronic filing to all attorneys of record. 

/s/ E. Samuel Geisler

E. SAMUEL GEISLER, FL Bar # 83817

Case 3:20-cv-05980-LC-HTC Document 1281 Filed 09/01/21 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

BRIAN BONNER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) CASE NO. 3:06-CV-00715-MHT

)

PAWN CITY, INC.; et al., )

)

Defendants. )

CONFLICT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

COMES NOW Brian Bonner, Plaintiff in the above-captioned matter, and in 

accordance with the order of this Court, making the following disclosure concerning 

parent companies, subsidiaries, partners, limited liability entity members and managers, 

trustees (but not trust beneficiaries), affiliates, or similar entities reportable under the 

provisions of the Middle District of Alabama’s General Order No. 3047:

x This party is an individual, or

o This party is a governmental entity, or

o There are no entities to be reported, or

o The following entities and their relationship to the party are hereby 

reported:

Reportable Entity Relationship to Party

Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 67 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

Respectfully submitted,

s/ David J. Hodge

Of Counsel for Brian Bonner

Bar Number: ASB -4617-I71H

Pittman Dutton Kirby & Hellums, P.C.

2001 Park Place North

1100 Park Place Tower

Birmingham, Alabama 35203

(205) 322-8880

(205) 328-2711 facsimile

Email: PHDKH-efiling@pdkhlaw.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on 6

th day of December, 2007, I electronically filed the 

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send 

notification of such filing to the following: 

John D. Gleissner, Esq.

ROGER & ASSOCIATES

Suite 650

3000 Riverchase Galleria

Birmingham, Alabama 35244

Todd M. Higey, Esq.

Gilbert C. Steindorff, IV, Esq.

ADAMS AND REESE/LANGE SIMPSON LLP

2100 Third Avenue North

Suite 1100

Birmingham, Alabama 35203

s/ David J. Hodge

Of Counsel for Brian Bonner

Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 67 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 2 of 2
# L_2015147EN.01002401.xml

| 12.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 147/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 147/24

---

Corrigendum to Directive 2014/60/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on the return of cultural objects unlawfully removed from the territory of a Member State and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 159 of 28 May 2014
  )

On contents page and page 1, title:

for:

‘Directive 2014/60/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on the return of cultural objects unlawfully removed from the territory of a Member State and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 (Recast)’,

read:

‘Directive 2014/60/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on the return of cultural objects unlawfully removed from the territory of a Member State and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 (Recast) (Text with EEA relevance)’;

on page 6, Article 17(1):

for:

‘1.   By 18 December 2015 and every five years thereafter, ...’,

read:

‘1.   By 18 December 2020 and every five years thereafter, ...’.

---
252.247-7022 Representation of Extent of

Transportation by Sea.

As prescribed in 247.574 (a), use the following provision:

REPRESENTATION OF EXTENT OF TRANSPORTATION BY SEA (JUN 2019)

(a) The Offeror shall indicate by checking the appropriate blank in paragraph (b) of this provision

whether transportation of supplies by sea is anticipated under the resultant contract. The term

“supplies” is defined in the Transportation of Supplies by Sea clause of this solicitation.

(b) Representation. The Offeror represents that it—

_____ Does anticipate that supplies will be transported by sea in the performance of any contract or

subcontract resulting from this solicitation.

_____ Does not anticipate that supplies will be transported by sea in the performance of any contract

or subcontract resulting from this solicitation.

(c) Any contract resulting from this solicitation will include the Transportation of Supplies by Sea

clause.

(End of provision)

Parent topic: 252.247 RESERVED
#  Index

**Parent topic:**Attachment 5601-1 Table Of Contents