alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

**World Omni Financial Corp.**

**Servicer Compliance Statement**

**Pursuant to Item 1123**

**ofRegulation AB**

I, Victor A. De Jesus, do hereby certify that I am the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of World OmniFinancial Corp., a Florida corporation, and further certify on behalf of World Omni Financial Corp. in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer”) under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of September 20, 2006 (the“Agreement”), among World Omni Auto Receivables Trust 2006-B, as Issuing Entity, World Omni Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor, and the Servicer, as follows: 

(i)         A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period covered by the issuing entity’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year endedDecember 31, 2006 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance under the Agreement, has been made under my supervision. 

(ii)         To the best of my knowledge, based on the review described above, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the ReportingPeriod. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand as of March 30, 2007.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the accompanying
Quarterly Report of Centenary International Corporation (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,Carlos Fabian De Sousa, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Carlos Fabian De
  SousaCarlos
      Fabian De SousaChief
      Executive OfficerMay
      21, 2010





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The
foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q solely
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and are not
being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure
document.
#### Ethel Magee et al., Respondents, v. Faymour Development Co., Inc., Appellant.

Appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 25, 1968, as granted plaintiffs’ motion to vacate defendant’s notice of discovery and inspection. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. We are of the opinion that where a corporation is a party to an action it is entitled to have discovery and inspection of any statements given by its employees to the opposing party (CPLR 3101, *812subd. [e]; CPLR 3120; *Briggs*v. *Spencerport Road Plaza,*19 A D 2d 943; 3 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N. Y. Civ. Prac., par. 3101.56). Brennan, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                   5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COOPER
LIFE SCIENCES, INC. QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED
APRIL 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                1,000
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                           67,008
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      0
<PP&E>                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   68,447
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 0
<BONDS>                                               0
<COMMON>                                            256
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                       65,751
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     68,447
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 40,453
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    586
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  39,867
<INCOME-TAX>                                      3,230
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              36,637
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                     36,637
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     17.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     16.23
        
<FN>
See the financial statements for an unclassified balance sheet.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Subpart 951.1 - Contractor Use of Government Supply Sources    **Parent topic:** PART 951 - USE OF GOVERNMENT SOURCES BY CONTRACTORS951.101 Policy.       (a) It is Department of Energy (DOE) policy that contractors performing under cost-reimbursement contracts should meet their requirements from Government sources of supply when these sources are available to them, and if it is economically advantageous or otherwise in the best interest of the Government.951.102 Authorization to use Government supply sources.       (a) The Head of the Contracting Activity may authorize contractors performing under cost-reimbursement contracts and subcontractors performing under cost-reimbursement subcontracts, where all higher tier contracts and subcontracts are cost-type, to use Government supply sources in accordance with the requirements and procedures in 48 CFR part 51, DOE PMR 41 CFR 109, and any necessary approval from the agency involved. This authority may be redelegated to the level of contracting officer. Direct acquisition by the DOE, rather than by a contractor under cost-reimbursement contracts, shall be required where deemed necessary by the Head of the Contracting Activity in order to carry out special requirements of appropriation acts or other applicable laws relating to particular items.          (c)          (1)  			The DOE central point of contact for the assignment, correction, or deletion of FEDSTRIP activity address codes is the Office of Resource Management, within the Headquarters procurement organization.          (e)(4) Materials, supplies, and equipment acquired from Government sources of supply under the procedures described herein must be used exclusively in connection with Government work, except as otherwise authorized by the Head of the Contracting Activity.951.103 Ordering from Government supply sources.       (b) The Senior Procurement Executive shall be informed of instances in which GSA sources of supply are not used because of the quality of the items available from GSA or when a Federal Supply Schedule contractor refuses to honor an order.
#### § 985.25 Alternate members.

An alternate for a member shall act in the place of such member (a) in the member's absence, (b) in the event of the member's death, removal, resignation, or disqualification, until a successor for the member's unexpired term has been selected and has qualified, or (c) when requested and designated by the member.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO.: 4:01cr28-SPM

LYNDON BURL BAKER,

Defendant.

____________________________/

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO MODIFY UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 3582

This cause comes before the Court on Defendant’s motion (doc. 108) to

modify sentence under the retroactive crack cocaine amendment (Amendments

706 and 711) and 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). The Government filed a response in

opposition (doc. 109).

Upon review, the Court finds that Defendant is not entitled to a sentence

reduction because application of the guideline amendment results in no change

to his sentencing range. Defendant is subject to a Career Offender

enhancement, which sets his offense level at 37. With a criminal history category

of VI, Defendant’s sentencing range remains 360 months to life imprisonment. 

Because Defendant’s sentencing range remains the same under the amended

guidelines, he is not eligible for a reduction. Accordingly, it is

Case 4:01-cr-00028-RS-GRJ Document 111 Filed 07/14/08 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the motion (doc. 108) to modify

sentence is hereby denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this fourteenth day of July, 2008.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 4:01-cr-00028-RS-GRJ Document 111 Filed 07/14/08 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than January 12, 2011.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Dennis Denney, Assistant Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:

                    1.                     *Citizens National Corporation,*                     Wisner, Nebraska to acquire up to an additional 2 percent for a total of approximately 34 percent of the voting shares of Republic Corporation, and thereby indirectly control United Republic Bank, both in Omaha, Nebraska                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 10, 2010.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-31462 Filed 12-14-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### §§ 984.450-984.456 [Reserved]
#### In the Matter of Stephen Behrman, Alleged to be a Permanently Neglected Child. Toby Behrman, Appellant; Jewish Child Care Association of New York, Respondent.

Order of the Family Court, entered on or about August 21, 1969 affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. In affirming, we point out, as the Judge who made the order did not, that, though there might be disagreement as to whether, reading together the requirements and definitions of sections 622 and 624 of the Family Court Act, “the allegations required by paragraphs * * * (c), and (d) of section six hundred fourteen are supported by a fair preponderance of the evidence ”, there can be no doubt whatever that, in the sad circumstances of this case, and, as provided by subdivision (e) of section 614, “the moral and temporal interests of the child require that the * * * [parent’s] * * 9 custody of the child be terminated permanently.” This conclusion is established by the overwhelming weight of the evidence. Concur — Eager, J. P., Capozzoli, Markewich and Steuer, JJ.
#### Chunqi Liu et al., Appellants, v Howard Wong et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

[814 NYS2d 526]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dorsa, J.), dated June *2,*2005, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendants Howard Wong and Mei Wong which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

In response to the prima facie showing by the defendants Howard Wong and Mei Wong that they were entitled to the benefit of the exemption provided by Labor Law §§ 240 and 241 from absolute liability for the owners of one- or two-family dwellings who contract for but do not direct or control the work, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the dwelling qualified as a one- or two-family dwelling, or whether the defendant Howard Wong directed or controlled the work *(see Bartoo v Buell,*87 NY2d 362 [1996]; *Angelucci v Sands,*297 AD2d 764 [2002]; *Yerdon v Lyon,*259 AD2d 864 [1999]).

In addition, since the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the defendants Howard Wong and Mei Wong directed or controlled the work, and they did not suggest that the Wongs had notice of an unsafe condition which caused *851the accident, the cause of action pursuant to Labor Law § 200 was also properly dismissed *(see Decavallas v Pappantoniou,*300 AD2d 617, 618-619 [2002]). Miller, J.P., Luciano, Lifson and Covello, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

LEROY WILLIAMS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

STATE OF ALABAMA DEPARTMENT 

OF TRANSPORTATION, JOE MCINNES, 

etc., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 

CASE NO. 2:06-cv-658-ID-TFM 

JOINT MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER

COME NOW Plaintiff Leroy Williams and Defendants State of Alabama Department of 

Transportation and Joe McInnes, jointly, through their respective counsel, and move this Court to 

modify the Uniform Scheduling Order issued by the Court (Doc. No. 8) as follows: 

1. To extend the time for filing dispositive motions from March 5, 2007, to and 

including June 7, 2007. 

2. This extension of time will permit discovery to have been completed and the 

issues in this matter clarified. 

Wherefore, premises considered, the parties move this Court to extend the date for filing 

dispositive motions to and including June 7, 2007. 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED 

TROY KING 

ATTORNEY GENERAL 

s/ Andrew W. Redd (RED001)

Jim R. Ippolito, Jr. (IPP001) 

Assistant Attorney General 

Chief Counsel 

Case 2:06-cv-00658-TFM Document 9 Filed 02/27/2007 Page 1 of 3
2

Andrew W. Redd (RED001) 

Assistant Attorney General 

Assistant Counsel 

COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS 

ADDRESS OF COUNSEL: 

State of Alabama Department of Transportation 

1409 Coliseum Boulevard 

Montgomery, Alabama 36110 

Telephone: (334) 242-6350 

Facsimile: (334) 264-4359 

redda@dot.state.al.us 

s/ Russell W. Adams 

Russell W. Adams (ADA042) 

Attorney at Law 

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF 

ADDRESS OF COUNSEL: 

Wiggins, Childs, Quinn & Pantazis, L.L.C. 

301 Nineteenth Street, North 

Birmingham, Alabama 35203-3118 

Telephone: (205) 314-0500 

Facsimile: (205) 254-1500 

rwa@wcqp.com 

Case 2:06-cv-00658-TFM Document 9 Filed 02/27/2007 Page 2 of 3
3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

LEROY WILLIAMS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

STATE OF ALABAMA DEPARTMENT 

OF TRANSPORTATION, JOE MCINNES, 

etc., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 

CASE NO. 2:06-cv-658-ID 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that, on February 27, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing with the 

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECT system. 

s/ Andrew W. Redd 

Andrew W. Redd (RED001) 

Assistant Attorney General 

Assistant Counsel 

ADDRESS OF COUNSEL: 

State of Alabama Department of Transportation 

1409 Coliseum Boulevard 

Montgomery, Alabama 36110 

(334) 242-6350 (office) 

(334) 264-4359 (facsimile) 

altonm@dot.state.al.us 

Case 2:06-cv-00658-TFM Document 9 Filed 02/27/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00712-MEF-CSC Document 6 Filed 09/05/2006 Page 1 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00712-MEF-CSC Document 6 Filed 09/05/2006 Page 2 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00712-MEF-CSC Document 6 Filed 09/05/2006 Page 3 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00712-MEF-CSC Document 6 Filed 09/05/2006 Page 4 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00712-MEF-CSC Document 6 Filed 09/05/2006 Page 5 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00712-MEF-CSC Document 6 Filed 09/05/2006 Page 6 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00712-MEF-CSC Document 6 Filed 09/05/2006 Page 7 of 7
5615 ATTACHMENTS    Attachment 5615-1: BUSINESS CLEARANCE MEMORANDUM       Attachment 5615-2: BUSINESS CLEARANCE MEMORANDUM SIGNATURE PAGE              HQ, United States Special Operations Command       Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L-K)       SOFARS 5615       February 2007 **Parent topic:** Part 5615 - CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of First Community Financial Corporation, (the
Company) for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Richard R. Leitzel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  |                                            
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------
|Date: August 12, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Richard R. Leitzel
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  | Richard R. Leitzel, Chief Financial Officer
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2964 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Mixtures of N-[[(4,6- 

dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl]-3-(ethylsulfonyl)–2- 

pyridinesulfonamide and application adjuvants, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 23, 2006 

Mr. CARPER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Mixtures 

of N-[[(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl]-3- 

(ethylsulfonyl)–2-pyridinesulfonamide and application adjuvants, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MIXTURES OF N-[[(4,6-DIMETHOXYPYRIMIDIN-2- 

4 YL)AMINO]CARBONYL]-3-(ETHYLSULFONYL)–2- 

5 PYRIDINESULFONAMIDE AND APPLICATION 

6 ADJUVANTS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.33.60 of the Har8 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 2964 IS 

1 Mixtures of N-[[(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2- 

2 yl)amino]carbonyl]-3-(ethylsulfonyl)–2- 

3 pyridinesulfonamide and application adjuvants) is amend4 ed— 

5 (1) by striking the article description and in6 serting the following: ‘‘Mixtures of N-[[(4,6- 

7 dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl]-3- 

8 (ethylsulfonyl)–2-pyridinesulfonamide and applica9 tion adjuvants (CAS No. 122931–48–0) (provided 

10 for in subheading 3808.30.15)’’; and 

11 (2) by striking ‘‘12/31/2003’’ and inserting 

12 ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

14 subsection (a) apply to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

15 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

16 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

MAI SYSTEMS CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of MAI Systems Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, James W. Dolan, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely
for the purpose of Title 18, Chapter 18, Section 1350 of the United States
Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (3) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and                                                          
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (4) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

|                      |  |                                                         
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2020 |  | /s/James W. Dolan
James W. Dolan
Chief Financial Officer