alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

EASTERN DIVISION 

BRIAN BONNER, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

 v. ) Case No.: 3:06-cv-00715-MHT 

 ) 

NORINCO a/k/a ) 

CHINA NORTH INDUSTRIES CORP., ) 

et al., ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

JOINT MOTION TO STRIKE JURY DEMAND

 As discussed with this Court during an on-the-record status conference on August 

25, 2008, the parties consent to a non-jury trial of this action. Accordingly, the parties 

move this Court to strike any prior jury demand. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

s/ David J. Hodge 

David J. Hodge 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

PITTMAN, DUTTON, KIRBY & HELLUMS, P.C. 

2001 Park Place North 

1100 Park Place Tower 

Birmingham, Alabama 35203 

(205) 322-8880 

(205) 328-2711 (facsimile) 

 OF COUNSEL 

Nick Wooten, Esq. 

WOOTEN & CARLTON, P.C. 

P.O. Drawer 290 

Lafayette, Alabama 36862 

(205) 864-2132 

(205) 864-2133 (facsimile) 

Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 104 Filed 08/28/2008 Page 1 of 2
2

 

 s/ Todd M. Higey 

 Todd M. Higey 

Attorney for Defendant 

Qiqihar Hawk Industries Co. 

RICHARDSONCLEMENT, P.C. 

200 Cahaba Park Circle, Suite 125 

Birmingham, Alabama 35242 

(205) 572-4100 

(205) 572-4199 (facsimile) 

 OF COUNSEL 

 s/ Alan D. Mathis 

 James C. Barton, Jr. 

 Alan D. Mathis 

 

 Attorneys for Defendant Norinco a/k/a 

 China North Industries Corporation 

JOHNSTON BARTON PROCTOR & ROSE LLP 

Colonial Brookwood Center 

569 Brookwood Village, Suite 901 

Birmingham, Alabama 35209 

(205) 458-9400 

(205) 458-9500 (facsimile) 

 OF COUNSEL 

W0658272.DOC

Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 104 Filed 08/28/2008 Page 2 of 2
#### § 958.240 Assessment rate.

On and after July 1, 2023, an assessment rate of $0.07 per hundredweight is established for Idaho-Eastern Oregon onions.

[89 FR 45754, May 24, 2024]
#### § 760.1715 Death, incompetency, or disappearance.

In the case of the death, incompetency, or disappearance of any affected farmer who would otherwise receive a milk loss payment, such payment may be made to the person or persons specified in the regulations contained in part 707 of this chapter. The person requesting such payment must file Form FSA-325, “Application for Payment of Amounts Due Persons Who Have Died, Disappeared, or Have Been Declared Incompetent,” as provided in that part.

[84 FR 48534, Sept. 13, 2019. Redesignated at 88 FR 62290, Sept. 11, 2023]
Exhibit 31

[IMPAC LOGGO]                                          IMPAC FUNDING CORPORATION
                                        19500 JAMBOREE ROAD o IRVINE, CA o 92612
                                         WWW.IMPACCOMPANIES.COM o 1.800.597.4101

            CERTIFICATION TO BE PROVIDED BY THE MASTER SERVICER WITH

                                    FORM 10-K

      Re: Impac Secured Assets Corp.,
          Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-3

I, Mario Fegan, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form
10-K of Impac Secured Assets Corp. Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series
2006-3 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

      2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

      4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in
preparing the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item
1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic
reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing
agreements; and Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements
required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
their obligations under the servicing agreements; and

      5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment
of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be
included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of
noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on
Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties, Countrywide Home Loans,
Inc., GMAC Mortgage, LLC, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company.

                                                      Date: 3/22/07


                                                      /s/ Mario Fegan
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Mario Fegan
                                                      V.P., Master Servicing
#### In the Matter of Edna V. Wareham, Respondent, v. Francis T. J. Wareham, Appellant.

In a support proceeding, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, entered June 10, 1969, which denied appellant’s motion for a rehearing of the proceeding. Order affirmed, without costs. The prior order dated September 27, 1967 is binding as to all matters that were litigated or should have been litigated. Since the matter now alleged does not fall into the category of newly discovered evidence, it was proper to deny a reopening of the issues inherently decided under the order of September 27, 1967 *(Statter*v. *Statter,*2 N Y 2d 668; *Matter of Merritt*v. *Merritt,*259 App. Div. 242, app. dsmd. 285 N. Y. 561). Rabin, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Munder, Martuscello and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 22 Filed 10/26/2006 Page 1 of 5
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 22 Filed 10/26/2006 Page 2 of 5
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 22 Filed 10/26/2006 Page 3 of 5
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 22 Filed 10/26/2006 Page 4 of 5
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 22 Filed 10/26/2006 Page 5 of 5
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3163 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on certain epoxy molding 

compounds. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. OBAMA introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on certain 

epoxy molding compounds. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN EPOXY MOLDING COMPOUNDS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.01.85 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 certain epoxy molding compounds) is amended by striking 

7 the date in the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/ 

8 31/2009’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•S 3163 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Eddie Canterbury, Chief Executive Officer,certify that: 

 

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Logan CountyBancShares, Inc.;

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.    The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)     Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)     Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.    The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a)     All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date:  November 24, 2004 | /s/ Eddie Canterbury    |   |
|-------------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                          | Eddie Canterbury        |
|                          | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
SUBCHAPTER F - SPECIAL CATEGORIES OF

CONTRACTING

PART 1334 - MAJOR SYSTEM ACQUISITION

PART 1335 - RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING

PART 1336 - CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS

PART 1337 - SERVICE CONTRACTING

PART 1339 - ACQUISITION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

PART 1341 - ACQUISITION OF UTILITY SERVICES

PART 1334 - MAJOR SYSTEM ACQUISITION

Subpart 1334.0 - General

1334.003 Responsibilities.

1334.005 General requirements.

1334.005-6 Full production.

Subpart 1334.2 - Earned Value Management System

1334.201 Policy.

1334.201-70 Policy.

1334.202 Integrated baseline reviews.

PART 1335 - RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING

1335.001 Definitions.

1335.006 Contracting methods and contract type.

1335.014 Government property and title.

1335.016 Broad agency announcement.

1335.016-70 DOC procedures for the use of broad agency announcements.

1335.017 Federal funded research and development centers.

1335.017-2 Establishing or changing an FFRDC.

1335.017-4 Reviewing FFRDCs.

PART 1336 - CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS

Subpart 1336.2 - Special Aspects of Contracting for Construction

1336.203 Government estimate of construction costs.

1336.270 Special requirements for ship construction

Subpart 1336.6 - Architect-Engineer Services

1336.602 Selection of firms for architect-engineer contracts.

1336.602-2 Evaluation boards.

1336.602-4 Selection authority.

1336.602-5 Short selection process for contracts not to exceed the simplified

acquisition threshold.

1336.605 Government cost estimate for architect-engineer work.

1336.609 Contract clauses.

1336.609-1 Design within funding limitations.

PART 1337 - SERVICE CONTRACTING

Subpart 1337.1 - Service Contracts - General

1337.110 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.

1337.110-70 Personnel security processing requirements.

1337.110-71 Additional DOC clauses related to service contracting.

Subpart 1337.2 - Advisory and Assistance Services

1337.204 Guidelines for determining availability of personnel.
PART 1339 - ACQUISITION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

Subpart 1339.1 - General

1339.107 Contract clauses.

1339.107-70 Information security.

Subpart 1339.2 - Electronic and Information Technology

1339.270 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.

PART 1341 - ACQUISITION OF UTILITY SERVICES

Subpart 1341.2 - Acquiring Utility Services

1341.201 Policy.

1341.202 Procedures.

1341.204 GSA areawide Contracts.
Editorial Note on Part 782
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 782 appear at 61 FR 32643, June 25, 1996.

§ 782.14 Identity preservation. ( a ) The importer and all subsequent buyers of the imported wheat shall preserve the identity of the Canadian-produced wheat.
( b ) Canadian-produced wheat may only be commingled with U.S.-produced wheat by the end user, or when loaded onto a conveyance for direct delivery to the end user or foreign country.
( c ) Failure to meet the requirements in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section shall constitute noncompliance by the importer or subsequent buyer for the purposes of this part.
449.501 General.

Use of special purpose termination clauses pursuant to the authority of FAR 49.501 shall be

approved in advance by the HCA.

Parent topic: Subpart 449.5 - Contract Termination Clauses
Exhibit 10.1









 


Field Point Capital Management Company


One Landmark Square, Suite 1900


Stamford, CT 06901












March 14, 2018







PASSUR Aerospace, Inc.


One Landmark Square, Suite 1900


Stamford, CT 06901







As Chairman of the Board as well as the principal shareholder of PASSUR Aerospace, Inc. ("PASSUR Aerospace" or the "Company"), I make the following commitment to the Company with respect to the period from the date of this commitment through March 14, 2019.







Liquidity







I commit that if the Company at any time is unable to meet its obligations through March 14, 2019, that I will provide the necessary continuing financial support to the Company to ensure the Company's ability to operate as a going concern through the period ending March 14, 2019. Such continuing support may take the form of additional loans or advances to PASSUR Aerospace in addition to the deferral of principal and/or interest payments due on outstanding loans to PASSUR Aerospace as referred to above.







These commitments are not conditional and are irrevocable through the period ending March 14, 2019.







I, G.S. Beckwith Gilbert, having the financial wherewithal to enter into this irrevocable commitment, make the above commitments to the Company and its shareholders.












/s/G.S. Beckwith Gilbert




G.S. Beckwith Gilbert


President
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D23-1989

LT Case No. 2006-CF-006338-A

_____________________________

BRYANT R. PAYNE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

3.853 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Lindsay Tygart, Judge.

Bryant R. Payne, Bonifay, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

September 19, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

HARRIS, BOATWRIGHT, and KILBANE, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
Subpart 52.3 - Provision and Clause Matrix

Parent topic: Part 52 - Solicitation Provisions and Contract Clauses

52.300 Scope of subpart.

The matrix in this subpart contains a column for each principal type and/or purpose of contract (see

52.101(e)).

52.301 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses (Matrix).

Key:

Type of Contract:

P or C = Provision or Clause DDR =

Dismantling, Demolition,

or Removal of

Improvements

IBR =

Is Incorporation by

Reference Authorized?

(See FAR 52.102)

A&E = Architect-Engineering

UCF =

Uniform Contract Format

Section, when Applicable FAC = Facilities

FP

SUP = Fixed-Price Supply INDDEL = Indefinite Delivery

CR

SUP =

Cost-Reimbursement

Supply TRN = Transportation

FP

R&D =

Fixed-Price Research &

Development SAP =

Simplified Acquisition

Procedures (excluding

micro-purchase)

CR

R&D =

Cost Reimbursement

Research & Development

UTL

SVC = Utility Services

FP

SVC = Fixed-Price Service CP/CS =

Commercial

Products/Commercial

Services
CR

SVC =

Cost Reimbursement

Service

FP

CON = Fixed-Price Construction Contract Purpose:

CR

CON =

Cost Reimbursement

Construction R = Required

T&M

LH =

Time & Material/Labor

Hours A = Required when Applicable

LMV = Leasing of Motor Vehicles O = Optional

COM

SVC = Communication Services

Far Matrix

https://www.acquisition.gov/far-smart-matrix

52.301-2 Matrix Notes

Note 1:

The following clauses are prescribed for use in letter contracts:

52.216-23, Execution and Commencement of

Work.

52.216-26, Payments of Allowable Costs

Before Definitization.

52.216-24, Limitation of Government Liability. 52.232-16, Progress Payments, Alternate

II.

52.216-25, Contract Definitization. 52.244-2, Subcontracts.
52.216-25, Contract Definitization, Alternate I.

Further instructions concerning provisions and clauses for letter contracts are set forth in

16.603-4(a).

Note 2:

The following clauses are prescribed for use in Small Business Administration 8(a) contracts:

52.219-11, Special 8(a) Contract Conditions. 52.219-18, Notification of Competition

Limited to Eligible 8(a) Concerns.

52.219-12, Special 8(a) Subcontract Conditions. 52.219-18, Alternate I

52.219-14, Limitations on Subcontracting.

52.219-17, Section 8(a) Award.

Note 3:

FAR provisions and clauses not identified on the matrix may be used in contracts for

commercial items consistent with the procedures and limitations in FAR 12.302

Note 4:

The following clause is prescribed for use in Information Technology Management Reform Act

(ITMRA) contracts:

52.239-1, Privacy or Security Safeguards. "A".
§ 900.64 The Judge's decision. ( a ) *Corrections to and certification of transcript.* ( 1 ) At such time as the judge may specify, but not later than the time fixed for filing proposed findings of fact, conclusions and order, or briefs, as the case may be, the parties may file with the judge proposed corrections to the transcript.
( 2 ) As soon as practicable after the filing of proposed findings of fact, conclusions and order, or briefs, as the case may be, the judge shall file with the hearing clerk his certificate indicating any corrections to be made in the transcript, and stating that, to the best of his knowledge and belief, the transcript, as corrected, is a true, correct, and complete transcript of the testimony given at the hearing, and that the exhibits are all the exhibits properly a part of the hearing record. The original of such certificate shall be attached to the original transcript and a copy of such certificate shall be served upon each of the parties by the hearing clerk who shall also enter onto the transcript (without obscuring the text) any correction noted in the certification.
( b ) *Proposed findings of fact, conclusions, and orders.* Within 10 days (unless the judge shall have announced at the hearing a shorter or longer period of time) after the transcript has been filed with the hearing clerk, as provided in paragraph (a) of this section, each party may file with the hearing clerk proposed findings of fact, conclusions, and order, based solely upon the evidence of record, and briefs in support thereof.
( c ) *Judge's Decision.* The judge, within a reasonable time after the termination of the period allowed for the filing of proposed findings of fact, conclusions, and orders, and briefs in support thereof, shall prepare upon the basis of the record, and shall file with the hearing clerk, his initial decision, a copy of which shall be served by the hearing clerk, upon each of the parties. Such decision shall become final without further proceedings 35 days after the date of service thereof, unless there is an appeal to the Secretary by a party to the proceeding: *Provided, however,* That no decision shall be final for the purpose of judicial review except a final decision issued by the Secretary pursuant to an appeal by a party to the proceeding.
[25 FR 5907, June 28, 1960, as amended at 38 FR 29799, Oct. 29, 1973; 67 FR 10830, Mar. 11, 2002; 88 FR 82231, Nov. 24, 2023]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

M.C., who sues by and through her )

mother and next friend, GAIL TATUM, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv83-LES

) (LEAD CASE)

PACTIV CORPORATION, et al, )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

On July 12, 2006, the court ordered the following cases consolidated for all pretrial

proceedings governed by FED. R. CIV. P. 26 through 27. 

2:06cv83-LES, M.C. v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv84-LES, Phillips v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv85-LES, Thompson v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv86-LES, Edwards v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv186-LES, Madden v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv187-LES, Davis v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv188-LES, Douglas v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv189-LES, Thompson v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv190-LES, Kelley v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv191-LES, Cravey v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

See Doc. # 59. 

Since that date, mediation has been unsuccessful and the following additional cases have

been filed. 

2:06cv660-LES, Adams, et al., v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv679-LES, Cassady, et al. v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv680-LES, Brooks, et al. v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv739-LES, Anderson et al., v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv757-LES, Harrison, et al., v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv758-LES, Lawrence, et al., v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

Case 2:06-cv-00660-LES-CSC Document 11 Filed 10/19/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

2:06cv759-LES, Hamilton v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv904-LES, K.C. et al., v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

At this juncture, it appears that all of these cases should be consolidated for all pretrial

proceedings; provided, however, that at a later date, the court may unconsolidate these cases

should it become necessary. Accordingly, for good cause, it is

ORDERED that the afore-referenced cases be and are hereby CONSOLIDATED for all

pretrial proceedings. It is further

ORDERED that the above-styled case be and is hereby DESIGNATED as LEAD case,

and that all pleadings shall be filed only in the lead case.

The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to docket and place a copy of this order in each

case file referenced herein.

Counsel are reminded of M.D. ALA. LR 5.1 which governs the filing of discovery

materials in this district.

Done this 19 day of October, 2006. th

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00660-LES-CSC Document 11 Filed 10/19/2006 Page 2 of 2
#### § 58.934 Sugars.

Any sugar used in the manufacture of sweetened condensed or sterilized milk products shall be refined, and of food grade quality.