alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATIONS I, Jim Howell Qian, certify that: 1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Northport Network Systems, Inc.;2.Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;4.The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:  (a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;(b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls a d procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);  (a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: April 14, 2011 BY:/s/ Jim Howell QianJim Howell QianChief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Drexel
Burnham Lambert Real Estate Associates III 1997 Third Quarter 10-QSB and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000761657
<NAME> DREXEL BURNHAM LAMBERT REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES III
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       3,616,956
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      33,286,545
<DEPRECIATION>                            (14,983,374)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,800,260
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                     15,528,587
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,165,499
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,800,260
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                      7,353,611
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,134,755
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,115,615
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   218,856
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3383 

To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain drawback claims 

relating to petroleum products. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 6, 2006 

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain 

drawback claims relating to petroleum products. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DRAWBACK CLAIMS RELATING TO PETROLEUM 

4 PRODUCTS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 514 of 

6 the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other pro7 vision of law, the Bureau of Customs and Border Protec8 tion shall, not later than 90 days after the date of the 

9 enactment of this Act, liquidate or reliquidate each drawVerDate Aug 31 2005 18:31 Jun 07, 2006 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3383.IS S3383

sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•S 3383 IS 

1 back claim described in subsection (c) at the full amount 

2 in each such claim. 

3 (b) PAYMENT OF AMOUNTS DUE.—Any amounts 

4 owed by the United States pursuant to liquidations or re5 liquidations under subsection (a) shall be paid by the Bu6 reau of Customs and Border Protection within 90 days 

7 after such liquidation or reliquidation. 

8 (c) DRAWBACK CLAIMS.—The drawback claims re9 ferred to in subsection (a) are the following: 

Drawback Claim Number: Filing Date:

AA6/0247626–6 ..................................................... 10/26/95

AA6/0301055–1 ..................................................... 09/27/95

AA6/0303661–4 ..................................................... 01/22/98

AA6–0248050–8 ..................................................... 09/27/95

AA6–0248051–6 ..................................................... 09/27/95

AA6–0248052–4 ..................................................... 09/27/95

AA6–0248053–2 ..................................................... 09/27/95

AA6–0248054–0 ..................................................... 09/27/95

AA6–0248055–7 ..................................................... 09/27/95

AA6–0248056–5 ..................................................... 09/27/95

AA6–0248057–3 ..................................................... 09/27/95 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
AURORA LOAN SERVICES
A Lehman Brothers Company



Depositor:  Structured Asset Securities Corporation
            745 Seventh Avenue, 8th Floor
            New York, NY 10019


Trustee:    Citibank, N.A.
            388 Greenwich Street, 14th Floor
            New York, NY 10013
            Attention Citibank Agency & Trust

Securities Administrator:


Subject:        Annual Officer's Certification
Fiscal Year:    2006
Securitization: LXS 2006-17

I, E. Todd Whittemore, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Aurora
Loan Services LLC (the "Master Servicer"), do certify the following for the
Calendar Year 2006:

1.    A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year (or portion thereof) and of its performance under the Agreement
for such period has been made under my supervision.

2.    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
aspects throughout 2006 (or applicable portion thereof), or, if there has been
a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, I have
specifically identified to the Depositor, and the Trustee each such failure
known to me and the nature and status thereof, including the steps being taken
by the Master Servicer to remedy such default.


                             Certified by: AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC




                                           By:/s/ E. Todd Whittemore
                                              ------------------------------
                                           Name:  E. Todd Whittemore
                                           Title: Executive Vice President
#### § 945.10 Producer.

*Producer* means any person engaged in the production of potatoes for market.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

WILLIE MCNAIR, )

)

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2:06-cv-695-WKW

)

RICHARD ALLEN, et al., )

)

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. )

____________________________________

)

JAMES CALLAHAN, )

)

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2:06-cv-919-WKW

)

RICHARD ALLEN, et al., )

)

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. )

ORDER

For good cause shown, it is ORDERED that Defendants’ Unopposed Motion to File

Expert Witness Depositions with Clerk’s Office (Doc. # 155) is GRANTED. The parties are

ORDERED to file copies of the depositions of Drs. Heath and Dershwitz with the Clerk of

the District Court under seal. The Clerk’s office is DIRECTED to accept and attach

document numbers to these depositions when they are filed. 

DONE this 28th day of December, 2007.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 157 Filed 12/28/2007 Page 1 of 1
Order entered January 15, 2014 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00692-CV 

IN THE INTEREST OF N. L. T., A CHILD 

On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DF04-10316-Z 

No. 05-13-00693-CV 

IN THE INTEREST OF M.T., A CHILD 

On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DF06-08087-U 

ORDER 

Appellant’s November 27, 2013 Unopposed Motion to Reopen Submission and for Leave 

to Add Documents is GRANTED, and the supplemental clerk’s record submitted on December 

10, 2013 is ORDERED filed as of that date. 

/Linda Thomas/ 

LINDA THOMAS 

CHIEF JUSTICE, RET.
252.239-7000 Protection Against Compromising Emanations.       As prescribed in                 239.7103             (a), use the following clause:          PROTECTION AGAINST COMPROMISING EMANATIONS (OCT 2019)          (a)  The Contractor shall provide or use only information technology, as specified by the Government, that has been accredited to meet the appropriate information assurance requirements of—          (1)  The National Security Agency National TEMPEST Standards (NSTISSAM TEMPEST 1-92, Compromising Emanations Laboratory Test Requirements, Electromagnetics (U)); or          (2)  Other standards specified by this contract, including the date through which the required accreditation is current or valid for the contract.          (b)  Upon request of the Contracting Officer, the Contractor shall provide documentation supporting the accreditation.          (c)  The Government may, as part of its inspection and acceptance, conduct additional tests to ensure that information technology delivered under this contract satisfies the information assurance standards specified.  The Government may conduct additional tests—          (1)  At the installation site or contractor's facility; and          (2)  Notwithstanding the existence of valid accreditations of information technology prior to the award of this contract.          (d)  Unless otherwise provided in this contract under the Warranty of Supplies or Warranty of Systems and Equipment clause, the Contractor shall correct or replace accepted information technology found to be deficient within 1 year after proper installations.          (1)  The correction or replacement shall be at no cost to the Government.          (2)  Should a modification to the delivered information technology be made by the Contractor, the 1-year period applies to the modification upon its proper installation.          (3)  This paragraph (d) applies regardless of f.o.b. point or the point of acceptance of the deficient information technology.          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 252.239 RESERVED
#### Beverly Brennan v. Gull Contracting Co., Inc., et al.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs. Concur — McGivern, J. P., McNally and Steuer, JJ.; Nunez, J., dissents in a memorandum. I dissent. Appellant is being penalized for her lack of financial resources and consequent inability to timely perfect the appeal in this death ease. In response to the motion to dismiss, appellant has submitted her affidavit explaining why she was unable to perfect the appeal, and her attorney’s affidavit showing merit. The grounds urged as error are the trial court’s improper refusal to admit evidence of prior accidents at the same location, and refusal to allow counsel for appellant to select his own jury. The merits are thus proffered and it cannot be said, at this point of the proceeding, that the appeal is without any basis. Simply put, the reason for the delay is alleged to be appellant’s inability to timely perfect the appeal due to lack of funds. In *756this regard her affidavit is quite candid. Appellant is the wife and administratrix of the decedent’s estate. While she has remarried, her husband does not earn sufficient to help her with the appeal; her meager income is used for the maintenance of her four minor children of the .prior marriage to the decedent. I believe this affidavit is sufficient to show the appellant’s status as being entitled to poor person relief, and to excuse her delay in prosecuting the appeal, The facts of this case, the nature of the cause of action, and the asserted merit to the appeal, all indicate that the reason for the delay in perfecting the appeal is as appellant claims. For these reasons, I would deny the motion to dismiss" ■and permit the cross-application for poor person relief to the extent requested, and extend time to .perfect the appeal to the September 1969 Term of this court.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**** 

**** 

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Stanley Louie, certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this report on Form 10‐K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of CorTS Trust V for IBM Debentures (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

2.             Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.             Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5.             All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of non-compliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10K. 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as Trustee.

Date: March 30, 2010

/s/ Stanley Louie
Order entered December 13, 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 16
- 00571
- CR
LAZARO SANTIAGO VELE Z, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 2 04th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F 12
- 52451
- Q



### O RDER After the Court granted two extensions of time, appellant’s brief was due November 28,
2016

. To date, the brief has not been filed and the Court has had no communi cation with appellant counsel. Therefore, the Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whethe r appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8( b ). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the
tria l court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.

– Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court isORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure ef fective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order. This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
§ 906.6 Handler. *Handler* is synonymous with *shipper* and means any person (except a common or contract carrier of fruit owned by another person) who handles fruit or causes fruit to be handled. ( a ) *Independent handler. Independent handler* means any handler other than a handler that is a cooperative marketing organization.
( b ) [Reserved]
36.513 Accident prevention.

(a) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.236-13, Accident Prevention, in solicitations

and contracts when a fixed-price construction contract or a fixed-price dismantling, demolition, or

removal of improvements contract is contemplated and the contract amount is expected to exceed

the simplified acquisition threshold. The contracting officer may insert the clause in solicitations and

contracts when a fixed-price construction or a fixed-price contract for dismantling, demolition, or

removal of improvements is contemplated and the contract amount is expected to be at or below the

simplified acquisition threshold. If the contract will involve work of a long duration or hazardous

nature, the contracting officer shall use the clause with its AlternateI.

(b) The contracting officer shall insert the clause or the clause with its AlternateI in solicitations and

contracts when a contract for services to be performed at Government facilities (see 48 CFR Part 37)

is contemplated, and technical representatives advise that special precautions are appropriate.

(c) The contracting officer should inform the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA),

or other cognizant Federal, State, or local officials, of instances where the contractor has been

notified to take immediate action to correct serious or imminent dangers.

Parent topic: Subpart 36.5 - Contract Clauses
#### § 958.10 Producer.

*Producer* means any person engaged in the production of onions for market.
§ 766.354 Voluntary conveyance of chattel. ( a ) *Requirements for conveying chattel.* The borrower must supply the Agency with the following: ( 1 ) An Agency application form;
( 2 ) A current financial statement. If the borrower is an entity, all entity members must provide current financial statements;
( 3 ) Information on present and future income and potential earning ability;
( 4 ) A bill of sale including each item and titles to all vehicles and equipment, as applicable;
( 5 ) A resolution approved by the governing body that authorizes the conveyance in the case of an entity borrower;
( 6 ) Complete debt settlement application in accordance with part 761, subpart F of this chapter before, or in conjunction with, the voluntary conveyance offer if the value of the property to be conveyed is less than the FLP debt.
( b ) *Conditions for conveying chattel.* The Agency will accept conveyance of chattel only if: ( 1 ) The borrower has made every possible effort to sell the property voluntarily;
( 2 ) The borrower can convey the chattel free of other liens;
( 3 ) The conveyance is in the Agency's financial interest;
( 4 ) The borrower conveys all chattel securing the FLP loan; and
( 5 ) The borrower has received prior notification of the availability of loan servicing in accordance with subpart C of this part.
( c ) *Charging and crediting the borrower's account.* ( 1 ) The Agency will charge the borrower's account for all recoverable costs incurred in connection with the conveyance.
( 2 ) The Agency will credit the borrower's account in the amount of the market value of the chattel.
[72 FR 63316, Nov. 8, 2007, as amended at 85 FR 36713, June 17, 2020]
Case 2:06-cr-00179-MHT-CSC Document 4 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 1 of 1