alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CAUSE NO. 03 -15 -00 455- CV

SCOTT P. OGLE, § COURT OF APPEALS

Appellant, §

§

§

v s. § THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

§

§

MAELI HECTOR, A/K/A MAELI §

ARELLANO, A/K/A MAELI §

JOHNSON, §

Appellee. § STATE OF TEXAS

APPELL ANT ’S FIRST MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF

COMES NOW, Scott P. Ogle, Appellant herein, requesting a fo rt y-five (45) day extension

to file his Appellant ’ s Brief.

Appellant seeks a forty-five (45 ) day extension. In the past thirty (30) days, Appellant has

prepared for several pretrials/trials, tried two cases, attended several depositions, and prepared for

two cases set for trial in the next two (2) weeks. While significant time has been spent on this

brief, Appellant respectfully requests a forty-five (45 ) day extension so that justice may be done.

Respectfully submitted,

LAW OFFICE OF SCOTT OGLE

By : _/s/_Scott Ogle

Scott Ogle

State Bar No. 00797170

2028 W. Ben White Blvd.

Austin, Texas 78704

Telephone: (512) 442-8833

Facsimile: (512) 442-3256

soglelaw@peoplepc.com ACCEPTED

03-15-00455-CV

6419258

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

8/10/2015 10:23:03 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERKCERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

I certify that I attempted to confer with opposing counsel and opposing counsel has not

agreed to this Motion

.

_/s/ Scott Ogle

Scott Ogle

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument has been delivered

to all counsel of record in accordance with the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, on this the 10 th day

of August, 2015

.

Paul Batrice

Law Office of Paul Batrice

1114 Lost Creek Blvd., Suite 440

Austin, Texas 78746

Via email: paul@batricelawfirm.com

Via facsimile: (512) 600

- 0217

_/s/Scott Ogle

Scott Ogle
#### In the Matter of Dorothy Dwire, Appellant, v. Nicholas M. Portanova et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding to invalidate petitions designating respondents as candidates in the Democratic Party Primary Election to he held on June 17, 1969 for the Party positions of District Leaders of the Democratic Town Committee of the Town of Harrison, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered June 6, 1969, which dismissed the petition in the proceeding. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Appellant is granted leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals. Questions of law have arisen which ought to be reviewed. Beldoek, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Martuseello, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in Registration Statement No. 333-131900 on Form S-8 pertaining to Hughes Communications, Inc. of our report dated March 26, 2007, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Hughes Network Systems, LLC and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2006 and for the period from April 23, 2005 to December 31, 2005, and the
combined consolidated statements of operations, changes in equity, and cash flows of Hughes Network Systems for the period from January 1, 2005 to April 22, 2005, and the year ended December 31, 2004, and the related financial
statement schedule appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hughes Network Systems, LLC for the year ended December 31, 2006.



|                                  
|----------------------------------
|/s/    Deloitte & Touche LLP      
|Baltimore, Maryland March 26, 2007
# 5235.006 Contracting methods and contract type.

 (b)(ii)(B) When the milestone decision authority          is USD(A&S), submit notifications via DASN(P) by email at usn.pentagon.asstsecnavrdadc.mbx.pabt@us.navy.mil with the subject          “[Activity Name] DFARS 235.006 – Major Defense Program – Intent NOT to Exercise a Fixed          Price Production Option on a Development Contract.” 

 (b)(iii)(B) Requests for USD(A&S)          prenegotiation position or negotiated agreements approval are to be submitted via DASN(P)          by email at usn.pentagon.asstsecnavrdadc.mbx.pabt@us.navy.mil with the subject          “[Activity Name] DFARS 235.006 – [Prenegotiation Position/Negotiated Agreement] Approval          Request.”

**Parent topic:**Part 5235 - RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING
Case 2:06-mj-00079-SRW Document 3 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### Miriam Cohen, Respondent, v. Stanley F. Cohen, Appellant.

Order, entered February 14, 1969, unanimously affirmed, without costs and disbursements. It appears that the trial of this annulment or separation action was scheduled for April 28, 1969 and counsel should have proceeded with such trial rather than seeking relief by appeal. *“*As we have stated many times before, the remedy for any seeming inequity in a direction for payment of temporary alimony based on conflicting affidavits is a speedy trial where the true facts as to the finances and standard of living of the parties can be ascertained, and plaintiff’s right to alimony can be finally determined. (See *Lerner*v. *Lerner,*22 A D 2d 771; *Gentile*v. *Gentile,*19 A D 2d 825.) ” *(Orenstein*v. *Orenstein,*24 A D 2d 753; see, also, *De Gasper*v. *De Gasper,*31A D 2d 886.) Of course, any award of permanent alimony should :be based upon the evidence adduced at the trial, “ and not .upon the amount awarded as temporary alimony, which is determined upon the moving papers *(Schine*v. *Schine,*28 A D 2d 976; *Sklan*v. *Sklan,*29 A D 2d 526; *Brown*v. *Brown,*31 A D 2d 516).” *(De Gasper*v. *De Gasper, supra.)*Concur— Eager, J. P., Capozzoli, MeGivern, McNally and Steuer, JJ.
EXHIBIT 35.1
                  SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                        RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC
              RFMSI SERIES 2006-S9 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized officer of Residential Funding Company, LLC,
as servicer  (the  "Servicer")  pursuant to the Series  Supplement,  dated as of
September 1, 2006,  and the Standard  Terms of Pooling and Servicing  Agreement,
dated as of September 1, 2006 (as amended from time to time,  the  "Agreement"),
among Residential Funding Mortgage  Securities I, Inc., as company,  Residential
Funding  Company,  LLC (formerly  Residential  Funding  Corporation),  as master
servicer,  and US Bank National  Association,  as trustee,  does hereby  certify
that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled  all of its  obligations  under  the  Agreement  in all  material
     respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:      /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      ------------------------
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title: Managing Director
****Mailing Addresses for Submission of Legal Letters andRelated Management Schedules****
****OMB Home****
**Mailing Addresses for Submission of Legal Letters andRelated Management Schedules**

**Office of Management and Budget**

**Department of the Treasury**

**U.S. General Accounting Office**

Privacy Statement
The BudgetLegislative InformationManagement Reform/GPRAGrants ManagementFinancial ManagementProcurement PolicyInformation & Regulatory Policy

Help

T H E   W H I T E   H O U S E
Case 3:06-cv-00722-WKW-TFM Document 1 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 1 of 7
Case 3:06-cv-00722-WKW-TFM Document 1 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 2 of 7
Case 3:06-cv-00722-WKW-TFM Document 1 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 3 of 7
Case 3:06-cv-00722-WKW-TFM Document 1 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 4 of 7
Case 3:06-cv-00722-WKW-TFM Document 1 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 5 of 7
Case 3:06-cv-00722-WKW-TFM Document 1 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 6 of 7
Case 3:06-cv-00722-WKW-TFM Document 1 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 7 of 7
Case 3:06-cv-00722-WKW-TFM Document 1-2 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 1 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00722-WKW-TFM Document 1-2 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 2 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00722-WKW-TFM Document 1-2 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 3 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00722-WKW-TFM Document 1-2 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 4 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00722-WKW-TFM Document 1-2 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 5 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00722-WKW-TFM Document 1-2 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 6 of 6
Case 1:06-cv-00703-MHT-CSC Document 28 Filed 04/05/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00703-MHT-CSC Document 28 Filed 04/05/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### § 966.53 Minimum quantities.

The committee, with the approval of the Secretary, may establish, for any or all portions of the production area, minimum quantities below which handling will be free from regulations issued or effective pursuant to §§ 966.42, 966.52, 966.54, 966.60, or any combination thereof.
§ 97.3 Plant Variety Protection Board. ( a ) The Plant Variety Protection Board shall consist of 14 members appointed for a 2-year term. The Board shall be appointed every 2 years and shall consist of individuals who are experts in various areas of varietal development. The membership of the Board, which shall include farmer representation, shall be drawn approximately equally from the private or seed industry sector and from the government or public sector. No member shall be eligible to act on any matter involving any appeal or questions under section 44 of the Act, in which the member or his or her employer has a direct financial interest.
( b ) The functions of the Board are to: ( 1 ) Advise the Secretary concerning adoption of rules and regulations to facilitate the proper administration of the Act;
( 2 ) Make advisory decisions on all appeals from the examiner or Commissioner;
( 3 ) Advise the Secretary on the declaration of a protected variety open to use in the public interest; and
( 4 ) Advise the Secretary on any other matters under the regulations in this part.
( c ) The proceedings of the Board shall be conducted in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Administrative Regulations of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (7 CFR part 25), and such additional operating procedures as are adopted by members of the Board.
[58 FR 42435, Aug. 9, 1993, as amended at 61 FR 248, Jan. 4, 1996]
#### In the Matter of Bernard Aisenberg, Appellant, v. William J. Van Wart et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of Westchester County, and Marvin L. Levitt et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding to invalidate petitions designating respondents Levitt and Baekelman as candidates in the Democratic Party Primary Election to be held on June 17, 1969 for .the Party position of County Committeeman for the 11th Election District of the 3rd Ward of the City of New Rochelle, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered June 12, 1969, which dismissed the petition in the proceeding. Judgment affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Beldoek, P. J., Rabin, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2022-04-13T08:18:01-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

NICHOLAS STRICKLAND, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs )

)

v. ) 1:06-CV-00682-DRB

) [wo]

CHAMPION ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER ON MOTION

For good cause shown in Defendant Champion Enterprises, Inc.’s Motion to Seal (Doc. 18,

filed Nov. 17, 2006) and pursuant to Paragraph b of the Order on Motion and Stipulated Protective

Order-Confidentiality (Doc. 17), it is 

ORDERED that the Motion to Seal (Doc. 18) is GRANTED. Accordingly, the Clerk is

DIRECTED to place documents attached to Defendant Champion Enterprise, Inc.’s Motion and

referenced as Exhibits “A” and “B” under seal, and the parties are directed to treat such exhibits

accordingly. 

DONE this 20 day of November, 2006. th

/s/ Delores R. Boyd

DELORES R. BOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 19 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 1 of 1
S. 3187

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the third day of January, two thousand and six

An Act

To designate the Post Office located at 5755 Post Road, East Greenwich, Rhode

Island, as the ‘‘Richard L. Cevoli Post Office’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RICHARD L. CEVOLI POST OFFICE.

(a) DESIGNATION.—The post office located at 5755 Post Road,

East Greenwich, Rhode Island, shall be known and designated

as the ‘‘Richard L. Cevoli Post Office’’.

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation,

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the post

office referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference

to the Richard L. Cevoli Post Office.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### § 956.96 Amendments.

Amendments to this subpart may be proposed, from time to time, by the committee or by the Secretary.
#### § 945.14 Export.

*Export* means shipment of potatoes beyond the boundaries of continental United States.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

EASTERN DIVISION (OPELIKA) 

ELIZABETH LYNNE HUTCHINSON ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 

3:06-cv-00700-WHA 

THE PHENIX CITY BOARD OF ) 

EDUCATION and LARRY E. DiCHIARA ) 

 ) 

 Defendants ) 

DEFENDANTS’ OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF’S EXHIBITS LIST

 Come now the Defendants, Phenix City Board of Education and Larry E. DiChiara, by 

and through their attorney, Sydney S. Smith, and object to the following exhibits designated by 

Plaintiff on July 2, 2007 in Document 40. 

1. Exhibits numbered 11 and 12 and described as newspaper articles. This objection is 

based on the ground that these articles are based on hearsay. Rules 801, et seq., Federal Rules of 

Evidence. 

2. Exhibits numbered 20, 21, 22 and 23 described as Plaintiff’s Calendars for the months 

of November 2004, and January, April and May 2005. The deposition testimony is that these are 

not the Plaintiff’s Calendars, but are instead the Calendars of her husband, Will McCart. These 

calendars are based on hearsay. Rules 801, et seq., Federal Rules of Evidence. 

Defendants also object to the following exhibits designated by Plaintiff on July 3, 2007 in 

Document 41. 

3. Exhibits numbered 39, 40 and 41 described as handwritten notes regarding Betty 

Cliatt. These notes do not indicate the author of those notes. Therefore, the author cannot be 

called to testify about the notes’ contents. These notes are hearsay. Rules 801, et seq., Federal 

Rules of Evidence. 

Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 46 Filed 07/12/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

 This 12th day of July 2007. 

 

Respectfully Submitted, 

/s/Sydney S. Smith 

Smith & Smith, P.C. 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Russell County Board of Education 

Larry E. DiChiara 

1503 Broad Street 

Phenix City, AL 36867 

334-298-2679 

ASB-4248-T82S 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have served the Motion for Summary Judgment upon Plaintiff’s 

counsel, by electronic filing and by email on this 12th day of July, 2007. 

 Joshua D. Wilson, Esq. 

 Rocco Calamusa, Jr., Esq. 

 Wiggins, Childs, Quinn & Pantazis, LLC. 

 The Kress Building 

 301 19th Street North 

 Birmingham, Alabama 35203 

jwilson@wcqp.com

rcalamusa@wcqp.com

 

 /s/ Sydney S. Smith 

Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 46 Filed 07/12/2007 Page 2 of 2
September 10, 2013 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: Meeting of U.S. EPA, Region 8 and State Air Directors representing all Region 8 states 

(Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming) 

TO: EPA Docket # EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0322 

This memorandum documents a meeting held on September 10, 2013, between all Region 8 State Air 

Directors and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8. 

One of the agenda items for the meeting was the EPA’s upcoming final rulemaking related to startup, 

shutdown and malfunction (SSM) provisions contained in various state implementation plans (SIPs). 

During the discussion related to this forthcoming rulemaking, EPA indicated that we were in discussions 

with the litigants (Sierra Club) to extend the current settlement agreement date for signature of the final, 

but that a potential extension was as yet undetermined. EPA also stated that the expected deadline for

states subject to the final SIP Call to submit SIPs to remedy the determined deficiencies was 18 months, 

as indicated in the February 22, 2013 proposed rulemaking. See 78 FR 12460. EPA also informed the 

states in attendance that their timely comments on the proposed rulemaking would be addressed in the 

final rule. 

No other matters related to the SSM SIP Call were discussed during the meeting. 

The following State Air Directors were present: 

Brian Gustafson – South Dakota; Bryce Bird – Utah; Dave Klemp – Montana; Steven Dietrich - 

Wyoming; Terry O’Clair – North Dakota; Will Allison – Colorado 

The following EPA Region 8 staff was present: 

Adam Clark; Carl Daly; Monica Morales and Scott Jackson.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1.000
<CASH>                                          13,365
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 4,475
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    100,082
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          39,154
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            39,425
<LOANS>                                        206,121
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,663
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 373,221
<DEPOSITS>                                     279,069
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              5,387
<LONG-TERM>                                     38,259
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,863
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,643
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 373,221
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 13,513
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,814
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   263
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                19,590
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               8,533
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,443
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           10,147
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      415
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 157
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,634
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,886
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,886
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .98
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .98
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.73
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,384
<LOANS-PAST>                                     2,236
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   900
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     89
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,750
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      522
<RECOVERIES>                                        20
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,663
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,050
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,613
        

</TABLE>
#### PRATT, HURST & CO. v. TAILER.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 12, 1906.)

Action by Pratt, Hurst & Co. against E. N. Tailer.

No opinion. Motion granted: Settle order on notice.
#### § 956.29 Expenses.

Members and alternates shall serve without compensation but shall be reimbursed for such expenses authorized by the committee and necessarily incurred by them in attending committee meetings and in the performance of their duties under this part.
1409.506 Procedures.

If the CO determines that contractor performance of the contemplated work is likely to create an

organizational conflict of interest, then the contracting officer shall refer the documentation of the

potential conflict and proposed resolution prepared in accordance with 7.105(b)(18) to the HCA for

approval. Referrals to the HCA shall be initiated by the CO and reviewed by the SOL.

Parent topic: Subpart 1409.5 - Organizational and Consultant Conflicts of Interest
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

B.B., a minor, by and )

through his mother and )

next friend, OWENA KNOWLES, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 3:06cv715-MHT

) 

PAWN CITY, INC., a )

corporation, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

Because of a scheduling conflict, it is ORDERED that

the uniform scheduling order is amended to reflect that

the pretrial will be on August 8, 2007, with all

deadlines tied to the pretrial date adjusted accordingly.

DONE, this the 21st day of February, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 23 Filed 02/21/2007 Page 1 of 1
Subpart 5601 - ATTACHMENTS    Attachment 5601-1: USSOCOM REVIEW AND APPROVAL LEVELS       HQ, United States Special Operations Command       Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L)       SOFARS 5601       February 2007 **Parent topic:** Part 5601 - THE FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION SYSTEM