alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)

I, Rod Lynam, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Gallery of
History, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
quarter period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.

Date:  May 13, 2005
                                 /s/  ROD LYNAM
                                 _______________________
                                 Rod Lynam
                                 Chief Financial Officer
#### § 948.125 Disqualification.

The committee from time to time may conduct surveys of handling of potatoes for special purposes requiring Certificates of Privilege to determine whether handlers are complying with the requirements and regulations applicable to such certificates. Whenever the committee finds that a handler or consignee is failing to comply with requirements and regulations applicable to handling of potatoes in special outlets, and requiring such certificates, a Certificate or Certificates of Privilege issued such handler may be rescinded and further certificates denied. Such disqualification shall apply to, and not exceed, a reasonable period of time as determined by the committee but in no event shall it extend beyond the end of the succeeding fiscal period. Any handler who has a certificate rescinded or denied may appeal to the committee in writing for reconsideration of his disqualification.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 236 (Thursday, December 9, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 76753]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30978]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLMT922200-11-L13100000-FI0000-P;MTM 91627]


Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease 
MTM 91627

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Per 30 U.S.C. 188(d), Antelope Resources Inc. filed a petition 
for reinstatement of noncompetitive oil and gas lease MTM 91627, 
Musselshell County, Montana. The lessee paid the required rental 
accruing from the date of termination.
    No leases were issued that affect these lands. The lessee agrees to 
new lease terms for rentals and royalties of $5 per acre and 16\2/3\ 
percent. The lessee paid the $500 administration fee for the 
reinstatement of the lease and $163 cost for publishing this Notice.
    The lessee met the requirements for reinstatement of the lease per 
Sec. 31 (d) and (e) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188). 
We are proposing to reinstate the lease, effective the date of 
termination subject to:
    <bullet> The original terms and conditions of the lease;
    <bullet> The increased rental of $5 per acre;
    <bullet> The increased royalty of 16\2/3\ percent; and
    <bullet> The $163 cost of publishing this Notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Teri Bakken, Chief, Fluids 
Adjudication Section, Bureau of Land Management Montana State Office, 
5001 Southgate Drive, Billings, Montana 59101-4669, 406-896-5091.

Teri Bakken,
Chief, Fluids Adjudication Section.
[FR Doc. 2010-30978 Filed 12-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DN-P
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications

  I, Kristen Ann Cronin, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A and all reports on Form 10-D
     required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report
     on Form 10-K/A of Deutsche Alt-A Securities Mortgage Loan Trust, Series
     2006-AR5 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
     light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

  4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
     servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
     conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
     this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
     in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
     their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects;
     and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
     criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
     reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
     asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
     accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
     13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
     except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances
     of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
     this report on Form 10-K/A.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
     information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
     American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc., as Servicer, Countrywide Home
     Loans Servicing LP, as Servicer, GMAC Mortgage, LLC f/k/a GMAC
     Mortgage Corporation as Servicer, GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc.
     as Servicer, IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. as Servicer, National City Mortgage
     Co., as Servicer, PHH Mortgage Corporation, as Servicer and Select
     Portfolio Servicing, Inc., as Servicer.

     Dated:    May 28, 2008

     /s/ Kristen Ann Cronin
     Signature

     Vice President
     (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master servicer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          10,599
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   85,087
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                95,686
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 655,686
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,738,491
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       349,112
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,431,917)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   655,686
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,868,563
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,216
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,870,779)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,870,779)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,870,779)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)


</TABLE>
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-3236

SYLVIA M. REILLY,

Petitioner,

v.

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT,

Respondent.

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in

DE831 E070359-I-1.

ON MOTION

Before PROST, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Sylvia M. Reilly moves without opposition for a 14-day extension of time, until

February 11, 2009, to file her reply brief.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted.

FOR THE COURT

FEB 2 2009

/s/ Jan Horbalv

Date Jan Horbaly	FILED

Clerk U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

cc:	Michael J. Dierberg, Esq.

Brian Thomas Edmunds, Esq.

s17

FEB 0 2 2009

JAN HORNY

CLERK
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76395-76396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30933]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATE AND TIME: Friday, January 14, 2011; 9:30 a.m. EST.

PLACE: 624 Ninth Street, NW., Room 540, Washington, DC 20425.

Briefing Agenda

    This briefing is open to the public.
    Topic: Gender and the Wage Gap.
I. Introductory Remarks by Chairman.
II. Speakers' Presentations.
III. Questions by Commissioners and Staff Director.

[[Page 76396]]

IV. Adjourn Briefing.

CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, 
Public Affairs Unit (202) 376-8591. TDD: (202) 376-8116.
    Persons with a disability requiring special services, such as an 
interpreter for the hearing impaired, should contact Pamela Dunston at 
least seven days prior to the meeting at 202-376-8105. TDD: (202) 376-
8116.

    Dated: December 3, 2010.
David Blackwood,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010-30933 Filed 12-6-10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
# 5242.1105 Assignment of criticality      designator.

 (1) The contracting officer shall determine the          appropriate criticality designator in conjunction with the program office or requiring          activity, for each contract.

**Parent topic:**Subpart 5242.11 - PRODUCTION SURVEILLANCE AND REPORTING
#### Alside Aluminum Supply Company, Respondent, v. Irwin Berliner, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Order insofar as appealed from unanimously modified to the extent of deleting the first ordering paragraph thereof and by deleting the word *“*answer ” from the second ordering paragraph thereof and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: In opposing plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on a guarantee agreement, appellant alleged that the agreement had been terminated prior to the accrual of any claim thereunder and presented proof (which was not denied by plaintiff) that plaintiff’s representatives orally agreed that the guarantee was no longer in *732effect and would not be used against appellant. Plaintiff relies on the provision of the agreement that it would continue in full force and effect until canceled by written notice. This provision requiring written notice, being for the benefit of plaintiff, might be waived by it. *(Sillman*v. *Twentieth Century-Fox,*3 N Y 2d 395, 402, 403; *Axelrad*v. *Axelrad,*285 App. Div. 903, affd. 309 N. Y. 687; *Knight*v. *Kitchen,*237 App. Div. 506, 512.) Where, as here, the guarantor has the right to limit the life of the contract by giving notice to terminate it in accordance with its provisions, his right is absolute (cf. *New York Tel. Co.*v. *Jamestown Tel. Corp.,*282 N. Y. 365, 372, 373) and if plaintiff, knowing of the guarantor’s intent to terminate, acquiesced therein and assured the guarantor that the agreement was no longer in effect and nobody would use it against him, such conduct on its part might well be found to constitute a waiver of the contract requirement of written notice of termination. Failure of appellant’s pleadings adequately to set forth any necessary allegation of waiver is not important at this stage of the proceedings because the pleadings may be amended. *(Curry*v. *Mackenzie,*239 N. Y. 267). The facts presented sufficiently show the possibility of the existence of triable issues of fact to defeat plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. *(Sillman*v. *Twentieth Century-Fox, supra,*p. 404.) (Appeal fom certain, parts of order of Onondaga Special Term granting motion for summary judgment.) Present—'Goldman, P. J., Marsh, Witmer, Moule and Henry, JJ.
#### § 985.24 Selection.

Committee members shall be selected by the Secretary from nominees submitted by the Committee or from among other eligible persons. Each person so selected shall qualify by filing a written acceptance with the Secretary prior to assuming the duties of the position.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

RICHARD MARSHALL, ) 

)

Plaintiff, )

 ) CIV. ACT. NO. 2:06cv701-ID

v. )

)

CHRIS WEST, et al., ) 

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

Upon CONSIDERATION of the motion to withdraw, filed on January 10, 2007

(Doc. No. 10), by Amanda Kay Morgan, and for good cause shown, it is ORDERED that

said motion be and the same is hereby GRANTED. 

Done this 11 day of January, 2007. th

/s/ Ira DeMent 

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00701-ID-CSC Document 11 Filed 01/11/2007 Page 1 of 1
252.249-7002 Notification of Anticipated Contract Termination or Reduction.       As prescribed in 249.7004, use the following clause:          NOTIFICATION OF ANTICIPATED CONTRACT TERMINATION OR REDUCTION (DEC 2022)          (a) *Definitions.* As use in this clause—          “Major defense program” means a program that is carried out to produce or acquire a major system (as defined in 10 U.S.C. 3041(a)).          (b) *Scope.* This clause implements section 1372 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 (Pub. L. 103-160) and section 824 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (Pub. L. 104-201), which are intended to help establish benefit eligibility under the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (29 U.S.C. chapter 32) for employees of DoD contractors and subcontractors adversely affected by contract terminations or substantial reductions under major defense programs.          (c) *Notice to employees and state and local officials.* (1) Within 2 weeks after the Contracting Officer notifies the Contractor that contract funding will be terminated or substantially reduced, the Contractor shall provide notice of such anticipated termination or reduction to—          (i) Each employee representative of the Contractor's employees whose work is directly related to the defense contract; or          (ii) If there is no such representative, each such employee;          (iii) The State or entity designated by the State to carry out rapid response activities described in the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (29 U.S.C. 3174(a)(2)(A)(i)); and          (iv) The chief elected official of the unit of general local government within which the adverse effect may occur.          (2) The notice provided an employee under paragraph (c)(1) of this clause shall have the same effect as a notice of termination to the employee for the purposes of determining whether such employee is eligible for training, adjustment assistance, and employment services under the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (29 U.S.C. Chapter 32).          (d) *Notice to subcontractors.* Not later than 60 days after the Contractor receives the Contracting Officer’s notice of the anticipated termination or reduction, the Contractor shall—          (1) Provide notice of the anticipated termination or reduction to each first-tier subcontractor with a subcontract that equals or exceeds the threshold specified in Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS)                 249.7003(c)(1) at the time of the notice; and          (2) Require that each such subcontractor—          (i) Provide notice to each of its subcontractors with a subcontract that equals or exceeds the threshold specified in DFARS                                    249.7003(c)(2)(i)              at the time of the notice; and          (ii) Impose a similar notice and flowdown requirement to subcontractors with subcontracts that equal or exceed the threshold specified in DFARS                 249.7003(c)(2)(ii) at the time of the notice.          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 252.249 RESERVED
#### In the Matter of Rita Howard, Respondent, v. Edward Robinson, Appellant.

In a filiation proceeding, the appeals are from (1) an order of filiation and support of the Family Court, Queens County, dated September 27, 1966, and (2) an order of said court dated February 8, 1968, which denied appellant’s motion to set aside the order of filiation and support, for a new hearing and for other relief. Order dated 'September 27, 1966 reversed, on the law, without costs, and proceeding remitted to the Family Court for a new hearing. The findings of fact 'below are affirmed. Appeal from order dated February 8, 1968 dismissed as academic, without costs. Appellant appeared at the hearing below without counsel. Under the circumstances, the trial court erred in putting questions to him without first advising him of his statutory right (Family Ct. Act, § 531) to refuse to testify *(Matter of Dean*v. *Young,*31 A D 2d 630). Accordingly, the filiation and support order must be reversed and a new hearing granted, especially since there is no evidence of paternity apart from appellant’s admission on the1 hearing. Additionally, we are of the opinion that the provisions of CPLR 208 relating to infants may not be employed to extend the time prescribed by subdivision (a) of section 517 of the Family Court Act during which a mother is permitted to commence a filiation proceeding *(Matter of Anonymous*v. *Anonymous,*48 Misc 2d 949; see, also, *Cimo*v. *State of New York,*306 N. Y. 143, 150, and cases' cited therein; Family Ct. Act, § 522). Since this proceeding was not commenced within two years after the child’s birth, petitioner may not prevail upon the hearing ordered hereby unless she alleges and proves that “ paternity has been acknowledged by the father in writing or by furnishing support” (Family Ct. Act, § 517, subd. [a]). Brennan, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Benjamin, Munder and Martuseello, JJ., concur.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Academic StandardsCollege FacultyCollege School CooperationElementary Secondary EducationHigher EducationHistory InstructionNational StandardsNon Western CivilizationState Departments of EducationState StandardsTeacher Education ProgramsTeacher ImprovementUnited States HistoryWorld History

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

§ 800.39 Suspension or revocation of registration for cause. ( a ) *General.* Registration is subject to suspension or revocation whenever the Administrator determines that the registrant has violated any provision of the Act or regulations, or has been convicted of any violation involving the handling, weighing, or inspection of grain under Title 18 of the United States Code.
( b ) *Procedure.* Before the Service suspends or revokes a registration, the registrant (hereinafter the “respondent”): ( 1 ) Shall be notified of the proposed action and the reasons therefor and
( 2 ) shall be afforded opportunity for a hearing in accordance with the Rules of Practice Governing Formal Adjudicatory Proceedings Instituted by the Secretary under Various Statutes (7 CFR, 1.130 through 1.151). Prior to formal adjudicatory proceedings, the Service may allow the respondent to express views on the action proposed by the Service in an informal conference before the Administrator. If the Service and the respondent enter into a consent agreement, no formal adjudicatory proceedings shall be initiated.
[48 FR 44456, Sept. 29, 1983]
#### § 966.3 Person.

*Person* means an individual, partnership, corporation, association, or any other business unit.
#### In the Matter of Maria E. Torres, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

Submitted June 11, 2007;

decided July 2, 2007

Reported below, 32 AD3d 1093.

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied *[see*8 NY3d 811].