alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00044

- CR

Robert Jones

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 371st District Court

o f Tarrant County (1260465D )

October 3 , 2013

Opinion by Justice Meier

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is o rdered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_________________________________ Justice Bill Meier
# 1435.010 Scientific and technical reports.

If a Research and Development (R&D) contract results involve classified or national security information, the CO shall follow the agency procedures prescribed in DIAR 1404.403 prior to making the results available. Copies of publications and reports are also required to be sent to the DOI Departmental Library, 1849 C Street, NW., MS-2258, Main Interior Building, Washington, DC 20240.   

**Parent topic:**PART 1435 - RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3180 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain compounds of yttrium cerium 

phosphates. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. BUNNING introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain compounds of 

yttrium cerium phosphates. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN COMPOUNDS OF YTTRIUM CERIUM 

4 PHOSPHATES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.10.05 Compounds, inorganic or organic, of 

rare-earth metals, of yttrium cerium 

phosphates (provided for in subheadings 

2846.10.00 and 2846.90.80) ................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•S 3180 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED

June 3, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-10921 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

FERRELL DAMON SCOTT,

DefendantAppellant.

-------------------------------------------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:00-CR-141-1-G

--------------------------------------------------------

Before JONES, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Ferrell Damon Scott pleaded guilty and wa s convicted of theft of interstate shipment and

aiding and abetting in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 659. He appeals the district court’s denial of his

motions to dismiss his indictment for violation of the Speedy Trial Act and impermissibl e postindictment prosecutorial delay in violation of the Sixth Amendment.

The district court denied the motions as untimely pursuant to F ED

. R. C RIM

. P. 12(c) and (f)

and alternatively on the merits. Scott does not address or contest the di stri ct court’s procedural-2-

ruling in his brief. This court “will not raise and discuss legal issues that [Scott] has failed to assert.”

Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner

, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Therefore,

because Scott ha s not addressed the procedural issue, he has thus abandoned this issue on appeal.

E.g.

, Yohey v. Co llins

, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). Additionally, because the procedural

ruling presents an independent, unchallenged ba sis fo r affirming the district court’s decision, we

affirm the dismissal on the procedural ground noted by the district co urt and need not analyze the

underlying merits of Scott’s motions. C f. Walker v. Thomps on , 214 F.3d 615, 624-25 (5th Ci r.

2000) (district court dismissed claim on procedural ground and on merits; although procedural ruling

was in error, failure to brief district court’s decision regarding merits constituted abandonment on

appeal, and dismissal was affirmed).

The judgment of the district court is therefore AFFIRMED.
§ 900.52a Answer to petition. ( a ) *Time of filing.* Within 30 days after the filing of the petition, the Administrator shall file an answer thereto: *Provided,* That if a motion to dismiss the petition, in whole or in part, is made pursuant to § 900.52(c), the answer shall be filed within 15 days after the service of an order of the judge denying the motion or granting the motion with respect to only a portion of the petition. The answer shall be filed with the hearing clerk who shall cause a copy thereof to be served promptly upon the petitioner.
( b ) *Contents.* The answer shall specify which of the material allegations of fact or of law in the petition are controverted and which are not controverted. The answer also may contain affirmative allegations of fact constituting separate defenses and statements of objections to the sufficiency of the whole or any part of the petition.
[25 FR 5907, June 28, 1960, as amended at 38 FR 29798, Oct. 29, 1973; 67 FR 10829, Mar. 11, 2002]
###### Editorial Note on Part 982

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 61 FR 17559, Apr. 22, 1996.

#### § 982.84 Duration of immunities.

The benefits, privileges, and immunities conferred upon any person by virtue of this subpart shall cease upon the termination of this subpart, except with respect to acts done under and during the existence of this subpart.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Herbert B. Grimes, certify that:

|   
|---
|(1)
|   
|(2)
|   
|(3)
|   
|(4)

|  
|--
|a.
|  
|b.
|  
|c.

|   
|---
|(5)

|  
|--
|a.
|  
|b.

|                     |  |                                                                                                                                 
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 28, 2008 |  | /s/ Herbert B. GrimesHerbert B. GrimesChairman of the Board of Directors andChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)



---
Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 8 Filed 10/17/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Lawrence W. Archambault, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Aulisi, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which disqualified claimant from benefits on the ground that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Claimant was employed as a taxi driver. On April 7, 1965 he was directed to pick up a 74-year-old lame passenger who had regularly used employer’s cabs to go from his home to his shoemaker shop. The passenger was accustomed to sitting in the front seat of the taxi, but on this day claimant would not permit it although so directed by his employer’s dispatcher. He then returned the taxi to his emploj'-er’s garage and quit his job claiming that it was not safe to have a passenger ride in the front seat and that the taxi was in a poor state of repair. The board found that the employer’s direction was a reasonable one and rejected claimant’s other complaints. What constitutes “ good cause ” within the meaning of subdivision 1 of section 593 pf the Labor Law is a question of' fact and thus within the purview of the board if its findings are supported by substantial evidence (Labor Law, § 623). On the record before us, we find no reason to disturb the board’s determination. Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur in a memorandum decision by Aulisi, J.
VI 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3433 

For the relief of Michael Anthony Hurley. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 6, 2006 

Ms. LANDRIEU introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Michael Anthony Hurley. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR MICHAEL 

4 ANTHONY HURLEY. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act (8 U.S.C. 1151) and section 240 of such Act (8 

8 U.S.C. 1229a), Michael Anthony Hurley shall be eligible 

9 for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of 

10 status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent 

11 residence upon filing an application for issuance of an imVerDate Aug 31 2005 03:02 Jun 07, 2006 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3433.IS S3433

jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 3433 IS

1 migrant visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjust2 ment of status to lawful permanent resident. 

3 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Michael Anthony 

4 Hurley enters the United States before the filing deadline 

5 specified in subsection (c), he shall be considered to have 

6 entered and remained lawfully and, if otherwise eligible, 

7 shall be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 

8 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) 

9 as of the date of the enactment of this Act. 

10 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

11 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap12 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica13 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

14 not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of 

15 this Act. 

16 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

17 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res18 idence to Michael Anthony Hurley, the Secretary of State 

19 shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 

20 current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 

21 immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the 

22 country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the 

23 Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)) or, 

24 if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that are 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
3 

•S 3433 IS

1 made available to natives of the country of the alien’s birth 

2 under section 202(e) of such Act. 

3 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

4 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 

5 parents, brothers, and sisters of Michael Anthony Hurley 

6 shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any 

7 right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Na8 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.). 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
```

[House Report 106-990]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

106th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     106-990

======================================================================

 
WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 
  4635, THE DEPARTMENTS OF VETERANS AFFAIRS AND HOUSING AND URBAN 
  DEVELOPMENT, AND INDEPENDENT AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2001

                                _______
                                

  October 18, 2000.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

Ms. Pryce of Ohio, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 638]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 638, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                summary of provisions of the resolution

    The resolution waives all points of order against the 
conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 4635) making 
appropriations for the Departments of Veterans Affairs and 
Housing and Urban Development, and for sundry independent 
agencies, boards, commissions, corporations, and offices for 
the fiscal year ending September 30, 2001, and against its 
consideration. The rule further provides that the conference 
report shall be considered as read.

                                  

```
United States Court of Appeals,

Eleventh Circuit.

No. 94-6699.

The INTERNATIONAL CAUCUS OF LABOR COMMITTEES, Richard Boone, Reverend,

individually and as a member of International Caucus of Labor Committees, Gary D. Kanitz,

individually and as a member of International Caucus of Labor Committees, Gerald E. Berg,

individually and as a member of International Caucus of Labor Committees, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

The CITY OF MONTGOMERY, The City of Montgomery Police Department, John Wilson, in

his official capacity as Chief of Police of the City of Montgomery, Defendants-Appellants.

May 9, 1997.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama (No. CV93-H-519-

N), Truman M. Hobbs, Judge.

Before ANDERSON and COX, Circuit Judges, and RONEY, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER:

New revised opinions in the above case having been filed by the Court, the Petition for

Rehearing addressing the original panel opinion has effectively been granted, and the grounds for

the Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc have effectively been mooted. Inasmuch as the petitioner

failed to prevail as to an affirmance of the district court judgment, the parties are, of course, free to

file petitions for rehearing and suggestions for rehearing en banc addressing this decision of the

Court, if they be so advised, subject to the applicable time constraints and the rules of procedure.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                                  12
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            1
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        13
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          13
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                              13
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            13
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
#### § 97.13 When the owner is deceased or legally incapacitated.

In case of the death of the owner or if the owner is legally incapacitated, the legal representative (executor, administrator, or guardian) or heir or assignee of the deceased owner may sign as the applicant. If an applicant dies between the filing of his or her application and the granting of a certificate thereon, the certificate may be issued to the legal representative, heir, or assignee, upon proper intervention.
#### § 984.33 [Reserved]
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 240 (Wednesday, December 15, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 78209]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31431]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service

Black Hills National Forest Advisory Board Public Meeting Dates 
Announced

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Black Hills National Forest Advisory Board (NFAB) has 
announced its meeting dates for 2011. These meetings are open to the 
public, and public comment is accepted at any time in writing, at the 
pleasure of the Chair, and during the last 15 minutes of each meeting, 
limited to three (3) minutes per person for oral comments.
    Meeting dates are the third Wednesday of each month unless 
otherwise indicated:
    January 5 (first Wednesday).
    February 16.
    March 16.
    April 20.
    May 18.
    June 15.
    July (No Meeting).
    August 17 (Summer Field Trip--TBA).
    September 21.
    October 19.
    November 16.
    December (No Meeting).
    January 4, 2012 (Tentative).

ADDRESSES: Meetings will begin at 1 p.m. and end no later than 5 p.m. 
at the Forest Service Center, 8221 S. Highway 16, Rapid City, SD 57702.
    Agendas: The Board will consider a variety of issues related to 
national forest management. Agendas will be announced in advance but 
principally concern implementing phase two of the forest land and 
resource management plan. The Board will consider such topics as 
integrated vegetation management (wild and prescribed fire, fuels 
reduction, controlling insect epidemics, invasive species), travel 
management (off highway vehicles, the new OHV rule, and related 
topics), and continuing access to multiple-use management of public 
lands, among others.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frank Carroll, Committee Management 
Officer, Black Hills National Forest, 1019 N. 5th Street, Custer, SD, 
57730, (605) 673-9200.

    Dated: December 8, 2010.
Craig Bobzien,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2010-31431 Filed 12-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
```
#### §§ 765.407-765.450 [Reserved]
##### 



Exhibit 4.33
 Avago Technologies (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd (704181-P)
    
    Tel: 604-6430611(formerly
known as Jumbo Portfolio Sdn Bhd.)
    
    Fax: 604-6445442Bayan Lepas Free Industrial Zone,11900 Penang, Malaysia
  
  LETTER OF OFFER
 (Exempt)




---



##### 



-s- Adam Clammer
    
    -s- Ken HaoAdam Clammer
    
    Ken HaoKohiberg Kravis Roberts & Co., L.P.
    
    Silver Lake Partners, LLC
 
  /s/ Tan Bian EeName: Tan Bian EeI.C. No.: S0250610FDate :




---



##### 



Avago Technologies (Malaysia) Sdn.
Bhd (704181-P)
Bayan Lepas Free Industrial Zone, Phase 3
    

(AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES LOGO)11900 Penang, Malaysiawww.avagotech.com
 
  
  Extension
of Employment
   /s/ Azhar Amin

Azhar AminHR Director
Avago Technologies Snd Bhd
 
  /s/ Tan Bian EeName : Tan Bian EeI.C. No.: S0250610FDate : 11-10-2006
#### FORD et al., Respondents, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

July 24, 1906.)

Action by Florence H. Ford and others against the city of New York.

No opinion. Judgment of the Municipal Court unanimously affirmed, with costs.
#### § 984.476 Report of walnut receipts produced outside California or the United States.

Each handler who receives walnuts from outside California or the United States shall file with the Board, on CWB Form No. 7, a report of the receipt of such walnuts. The report shall be filed as follows: On or before December 5 for such walnuts received during the period September 1 to November 30; on or before March 5 for such walnuts received during the period December 1 to February 28 (February 29 in a leap year); on or before June 5 for such walnuts received during the period March 1 to May 31; and on or before September 5 for such walnuts received during the period June 1 to August 31. The report shall include the quantity of such walnuts received, the country of origin for such walnuts, and whether such walnuts are inshell or shelled.

[88 FR 56750, Aug. 21, 2023]
Order entered November 15, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05 - 21 - 00760 - CV CITY OF DALLAS , Appellant

V. LYNN PELTIER , Appellee On Appeal from the County Court a t Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 20 - 04958 - D

O RDER Before the Court is appellee’s November 10, 2021 unopposed motion for an extension of time to file her brief. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to December 8, 2021

.
/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 239 (Tuesday, December 14, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 77959]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31300]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

[OMB Control No. 2900-0675]


VetBiz Vendor Information Pages Verification Program; Correction

AGENCY: Center for Veterans Enterprise, Department of Veterans Affairs.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) published a collection 
of information notice in the Federal Register on December 7, 2010, that 
contained an error. The notice incorrectly identified the responsible 
VA organization. This document corrects that error by removing 
``Veterans Benefits Administration'' and adding, in its place, ``Center 
for Veterans Enterprise''.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Denise McLamb, Enterprise Records 
Service (005R1B), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, 
NW., Washington, DC 20420, at 202-461-7485.

Correction

    In FR Doc. 2010-30550, published on December 7, 2010, at 75 FR 
76080, make the following correction. On page 76080, in the first 
column, at the Agency heading, remove ``Veterans Benefits 
Administration'' and add, in its place, ``Center for Veterans 
Enterprise''.

    Dated: December 8, 2010.
Gloria P. Armstrong,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Veterans Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2010-31300 Filed 12-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
1332.1108 Payment by Governmentwide

commercial purchase card.

Use of the Governmentwide commercial purchase card is subject to the requirements of the FAR,

other internal Departmental policies, as well as operating unit policies and procedures related to the

purchase card. All purchases made with the purchase card must comply with all procedures and

documentation requirements that apply to the procurement action.

Parent topic: Subpart 1332.11 - Electronic Funds Transfer