78800 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 241 / Thursday, December 16, 2010 / Notices 

DATES: Effective Date: The effective date 

of the FAA’s approval of the Fort Worth 

Alliance Airport noise compatibility 

program is December 1, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

DOT/FAA Southwest Region, Mr. Paul 

Blackford, ASW–652B, 2601 Meacham 

Boulevard, Fort Worth, Texas 76137. 

Documents reflecting this FAA action 

may be reviewed at this same location. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

notice announces that the FAA has 

given its overall approval to the noise 

compatibility program for Fort Worth 

Alliance Airport, effective December 1, 

2010. 

Under section 47504 of the Act, an 

airport operator who has previously 

submitted a noise exposure map may 

submit to the FAA a noise compatibility 

program which sets forth the measures 

taken or proposed by the airport 

operator for the reduction of existing 

non-compatible land uses and 

prevention of additional non-compatible 

land uses within the area covered by the 

noise exposure maps. The Act requires 

such programs to be developed in 

consultation with interested and 

affected parties including local 

communities, government agencies, 

airport users, and FAA personnel. 

Each airport noise compatibility 

program developed in accordance with 

Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) Part 

150 is a local program, not a Federal 

program. The FAA does not substitute 

its judgment for that of the airport 

proprietor with respect to which 

measures should be recommended for 

action. The FAA’s approval or 

disapproval of FAR Part 150 program 

recommendations is measured 

according to the standards expressed in 

Part 150 and the Act and is limited to 

the following determinations: 

a. The noise compatibility program 

was developed in accordance with the 

provisions and procedures of FAR Part 

150; 

b. Program measures are reasonably 

consistent with achieving the goals of 

reducing existing non-compatible land 

uses around the airport and preventing 

the introduction of additional noncompatible land uses; 

c. Program measures would not create 

an undue burden on interstate or foreign 

commerce, unjustly discriminate against 

types or classes of aeronautical uses, 

violate the terms of airport grant 

agreements, or intrude into areas 

preempted by the Federal Government; 

and 

d. Program measures relating to the 

use of flight procedures can be 

implemented within the period covered 

by the program without derogating 

safety, adversely affecting the efficient 

use and management of the navigable 

airspace and air traffic control systems, 

or adversely affecting other powers and 

responsibilities of the Administrator 

prescribed by law. 

Specific limitations with respect to 

FAA’s approval of an airport noise 

compatibility program are delineated in 

FAR Part 150, section 150.5. Approval 

is not a determination concerning the 

acceptability of land uses under Federal, 

state, or local law. Approval does not by 

itself constitute an FAA implementing 

action. A request for Federal action or 

approval to implement specific noise 

compatibility measures may be 

required, and an FAA decision on the 

request may require an environmental 

assessment of the proposed action. 

Approval does not constitute a 

commitment by the FAA to financially 

assist in the implementation of the 

program nor a determination that all 

measures covered by the program are 

eligible for grant-in-aid funding from the 

FAA. Where Federal funding is sought, 

requests for project grants must be 

submitted to the FAA Regional Office in 

Fort Worth, Texas. 

The city of Fort Worth submitted to 

the FAA on July 30, 2010, the noise 

exposure maps, descriptions, and other 

documentation produced during the 

noise compatibility planning study 

conducted from August 9, 2005 through 

July 30, 2010. The final Fort Worth 

Alliance Airport noise exposure maps 

were determined by FAA to be in 

compliance with applicable 

requirements on May 5, 2009. Notice of 

this determination was published in the 

Federal Register on May 14, 2009. 

The Fort Worth Alliance Airport 

study contains a proposed noise 

compatibility program comprised of 

actions designed for phased 

implementation by airport management 

and adjacent jurisdictions from July 30, 

2010, to the year 2014. It was requested 

that the FAA evaluate and approve this 

material as a noise compatibility 

program as described in section 47504 

of the Act. The FAA began its review of 

the program on July 30, 2010 and was 

required by a provision of the Act to 

approve or disapprove the program 

within 180 days (other than the use of 

new or modified flight procedures for 

noise control). Failure to approve or 

disapprove such program within the 

180-day period shall be deemed to be an 

approval of such program. 

The submitted program contained two 

proposed actions for noise mitigation off 

the airport. The FAA completed its 

review and determined that the 

procedural and substantive 

requirements of the Act and FAR Part 

150 have been satisfied. The overall 

program, therefore, was approved by the 

FAA effective December 1, 2010. 

Outright approval was granted for all 

of the specific program elements. 

Approved action items include remedial 

land use mitigation measures consisting 

of land acquisition and a sound 

insulation program. 

These determinations are set forth in 

detail in a Record of Approval signed by 

the Southwest Region, Airports Division 

Manager on December 1, 2010. The 

Record of Approval, as well as other 

evaluation materials and the documents 

comprising the submittal, are available 

for review at the FAA office listed above 

and at the administrative offices of the 

city of Fort Worth. The Record of 

Approval also will be available on-line 

at http://www.faa.gov/arp/ 

environmental/14cfr150/index14.cfm. 

Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, December 3, 

2010. 

Kelvin L. Solco, 

Manager, Airports Division. 

[FR Doc. 2010–31510 Filed 12–15–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials 

Safety Administration 

Office of Hazardous Materials Safety; 

Notice of Delays in Processing of 

Special Permits Applications 

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous 

Materials Safety Administration 

(PHMSA), DOT. 

ACTION: List of applications delayed 

more than 180 days. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

requirements of 49 U.S.C. 5117(c), 

PHMSA is publishing the following list 

of special permit applications that have 

been in process for 180 days or more. 

The reason(s) for delay and the expected 

completion date for action on each 

application is provided in association 

with each identified application. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Delmer F. Billings, Director, Office of 

Hazardous Materials Special Permits 

and Approvals, Pipeline and Hazardous 

Materials Safety Administration, U.S. 

Department of Transportation, East 

Building, PHH–30, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue, Southeast, Washington, DC 

20590–0001, (202) 366–4535. 

Key to ‘‘Reason for Delay’’ 

1. Awaiting additional information 

from applicant. 

2. Extensive public comment under 

review. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 241 / Thursday, December 16, 2010 / Notices 78801 

3. Application is technically complex 

and is of significant impact or 

precedent-setting and requires extensive 

analysis. 

4. Staff review delayed by other 

priority issues or volume of special 

permit applications. 

Meaning of Application Number 

Suffixes 

N—New application. 

M—Modification request. 

PM—Party to application with 

modification request. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on December 9, 

2010. 

Donald Burger, 

Chief, Special Permits and Approvals Branch. 

Application 

No. Applicant Reason for delay 

Estimated date 

of completion 

Modification to Special Permits 

10922–M ....... FIBA Technologies, Inc. Millbury, MA ........................................................................................ 4 12–31–2010 

14167–M ....... Trinityrail, Dallas, TX .................................................................................................................. 4 03–31–2011 

13736–M ....... ConocoPhillips, Anchorage, AK ................................................................................................. 4 03–31–2011 

6293–M ......... ATK Space Systems, Inc. (Former Grantee: ATK Thiokol, Inc.), Corine, UT ........................... 4 03–31–2011 

14741–M ....... Weatherford International, Fort Worth, TX ................................................................................. 4 03–31–2011 

14650–M ....... Air Transport International, L.L.C., Little Rock, AR .................................................................... 4 03–31–2011 

14926–M ....... Lynden Air Cargo, Anchorage, AK ............................................................................................. 4 11–30–2010 

8826–M ......... Phoenix Air Group, Inc., Cartersville, GA .................................................................................. 4 03–31–2011 

10869–M ....... Norris Cylinder Company, Longview, TX ................................................................................... 4 03–31–2011 

10049–M ....... Martin Transport, Inc., Kilgore, TX ............................................................................................. 4 01–31–2011 

8815–M ......... Florex Explosives, Inc., Crystal River, FL .................................................................................. 4 01–31–2011 

14447–M ....... SNF Holding Company , Riceboro, GA ..................................................................................... 4 01–31–2011 

12561–M ....... Rhodia, Inc., Cranbury. NJ ......................................................................................................... 4 01–31–2011 

14617–M ....... Western International, Gas Cylinders, Inc., Bellville, TX ........................................................... 4 01–31–2011 

3121–M ......... Department of Defense, Scott Air Force Base, IL ..................................................................... 4 02–15–2011 

12783–M ....... CryoSurgery, Inc., Nashville, TN ................................................................................................ 4 02–15–2011 

14573–M ....... Polar Tank Trailer, LLC–FC, Holdingford, MN ........................................................................... 4 02–15–2011 

I0407–M ........ Thermo Process Instruments, LP (Former Grantee: Thermo MeasureTech), Sugar Land, TX 4 02–15–2011 

14546–M ....... Linde Gas North America LLC–FC Murray Hill, NJ ................................................................... 4 02–15–2011 

14763–M ....... Weatherford International, Forth Worth, TX ............................................................................... 4 02–15–2011 

10646–M ....... Schlumberger Technologies Corporation, Sugar Land, TX ....................................................... 4 02–15–2011 

12929–M ....... Air Products & Chemicals, Inc., Allentown, PA .......................................................................... 4 02–15–2011 

11789–M ....... Mallard Creek Polymers, Inc., Charlotte, NC ............................................................................. 4 02–15–2011 

8445–M ......... Clean Harbors Environmental Services, Inc.—Fails MEF, Norwell, MA ................................... 4 02–15–2011

14860–M ....... Alaska Airlines, Seattle, WA ....................................................................................................... 4 01–31–2011 

New Special Permit Applications 

14810–N ....... Olin Corporation, Chior Alkai Products Division, Cleveland, TN ............................................... 4 03–31–2011 

14813–N ....... Organ Recovery Systems, Des Plaines, IL ................................................................................ 4 03–31–2011 

14835–N ....... The Reusable Industrial Packaging Assoc., Washington, DC ................................................... 4 03–31–2011 

14839–N ....... Matheson Tn-Gas, Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ ............................................................................... 3 11–30–2010 

14851–N ....... Alaska Airlines, Inc., Seattle, WA ............................................................................................... 4 03–31–2011 

14868–N ....... Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Bentonville, AR ....................................................................................... 4 03–31–2011 

14878–N ....... Humboldt County Waste Management Authority, Eureka, CA .................................................. 4 03–31–2011 

14872–N ....... Arkema, Inc., Philadelphia, PA ................................................................................................... 4 03–31–2011 

14929–N ....... Alaska Island Air, Inc., Togiak, AK ............................................................................................. 4 11–30–2010 

14945–N ....... Vulcan Construction Materials LP SE dlb/a Vulcan Materials Company, Atlanta, GA .............. 4 03–31–2011 

1495 1–N ...... Lincoln Composites, Lincoln, NE ............................................................................................... 1 11–30–2010 

14960–N ....... Cheltec, Inc., Sarasota, FL ......................................................................................................... 4 03–31–2011 

14965–N ....... JiangXi Oxygen Plant Co., Ltd., Jiangxi Province ..................................................................... 4 11–30–2010 

14972–N ....... Air Products and Chemicals, Allentown, PA .............................................................................. 4 11–30–2010 

14977–N ....... Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., Allentown, PA ...................................................................... 4 03–31–2011 

14985–N ....... Southern States, LLC, Atlanta, GA ............................................................................................ 4 02–15–2011 

14992–N ....... VIP Transport, Inc., Corona, CA ................................................................................................ 4 02–28–2010 

14989–N ....... Vinci-technologies ....................................................................................................................... 4 02–28–2011 

14994–N ....... Auto Chior System, Memphis, TN .............................................................................................. 4 02–28–2010 

15003–N ....... Gebauer Company, Cleveland, OH ........................................................................................... 4 02–28–2011 

15027–N ....... Northrop Grumman Corporation, Baltimore, MD ....................................................................... 4 02–28–2011 

15028–N ....... Roeder Cartage Company, LIMA, OH ....................................................................................... 4 02–28–2011 

15031–N ....... Euro Asia Packaging (Guangdong) Co., Ltd. ZhongShan, Canton ........................................... 4 02–28–2011 

15036–N ....... UTLX Manufacturing, Incorporated, Alexandria, LA .................................................................. 4 02–28–2011 

15175–N ....... Horizon Air Industries, Inc., Seattle, WA .................................................................................... 4 02–28–2011 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
78802 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 241 / Thursday, December 16, 2010 / Notices 

[FR Doc. 2010–31403 Filed 12–15–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–60–M 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Financial Management Service 

Privacy Act of 1974, as Amended; 

System of Records 

AGENCY: Financial Management Service, 

Treasury. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed new system 

of records. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

Privacy Act of 1974, as amended, the 

Financial Management Service gives 

notice of a proposed new Privacy Act 

system of records entitled ‘‘Treasury/ 

FMS .008–Mailing List Records.’’ 

DATES: Comments must be received no 

later than January 18, 2011. The 

proposed new system of records will 

become effective January 18, 2011 

unless comments are received which 

would result in a contrary 

determination. 

ADDRESSES: You should send your 

comments to Peter Genova, Deputy 

Chief Information Officer, Financial 

Management Service, 401 14th Street, 

SW., Washington, DC 20227. Comments 

received will be available for inspection 

at the same address between the hours 

of 9 a.m. and 4 p.m. Monday through 

Friday. You may send your comments 

by electronic mail to 

peter.genova@fms.treas.gov or 

regulations.gov. All comments, 

including attachments and other 

supporting materials, received are 

subject to public disclosure. You should 

submit only information that you wish 

to make available publicly. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Peter Genova, Deputy Chief Information 

Officer, (202) 874–1736. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant 

to the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended, 

5 U.S.C. 552a, the Financial 

Management Service (FMS) is proposing 

to establish a new system of records 

entitled ‘‘Mailing List Records— 

Treasury/FMS .008.’’ FMS proposes to 

obtain and use mailing list records from 

commercial database providers for the 

purpose of mailing information to lowto moderate-income individuals 

(individuals with income under $35,000 

annually), who are more likely to be 

unbanked or underbanked, about 

options to receive Federal tax refund 

payments electronically. The letters will 

include information about a debit card 

account recommended by the U.S. 

Department of the Treasury (Treasury) 

to which Federal tax refund payments 

may be electronically deposited. 

Commercial database providers obtain 

information from publicly available 

records or through means that we 

understand to be compliant with 

applicable privacy laws. 

FMS, a bureau within the U.S. 

Department of the Treasury (Treasury), 

is responsible for disbursing public 

money by paper check and electronic 

funds transfer (EFT) on behalf of most 

Federal agencies. Making payments by 

EFT, rather than by paper check, 

benefits both recipients and the 

Government. Direct deposit and other 

EFT payments are credited to recipients’ 

accounts on the day payment is due, so 

the funds generally are available sooner 

than with check payments. Individuals 

receiving Federal payments 

electronically rarely have any delays or 

problems with their payments. In 

contrast, based on payment claims filed 

with FMS, nine out of ten problems 

with FMS-disbursed payments are 

related to paper checks even though 

checks constitute only 18 percent of all 

FMS-disbursed payments made by the 

Government. For example, in fiscal year 

2010, FMS mailed more than 130 

million Federal benefit checks to 

approximately 11 million benefit 

recipients, resulting in extra costs to 

taxpayers of more than $117 million 

that would not have been incurred had 

those payments been made by EFT. In 

the same fiscal year, only 63% of 

taxpayers received their tax refund 

payment electronically, with 

approximately 45 million tax refund 

payments being delivered by paper 

check, resulting in extra costs to the tax 

payers of more than $40 million that 

would not have been incurred had the 

payments been made by EFT. For 

individuals receiving EFT instead of 

paper check they receive their refund 

more quickly, with a much smaller 

chance of delay such as a lost or stolen 

check, and if they have no bank account 

without the need to pay for private 

check cashing service to get access 

quickly to the funds in their refund 

check. 

For the 2010 tax filing season, FMS 

will mail approximately 600,000 letters 

to low- and moderate-income 

individuals offering them the 

opportunity to participate in a pilot 

program to establish a reloadable debit 

card account to which their Federal tax 

refund payments could be deposited 

electronically. For this purpose, FMS 

will purchase name and address 

information for low- to moderateincome individuals from a commercial 

database provider. In addition, the 

mailing list records may also be used to 

study the effectiveness of mailing 

outreach designed to streamline 

payment processes. 

The records covered by the proposed 

system are necessary to allow FMS to 

offer electronic payment options to a 

wide variety of potential Federal 

payment recipients. The records may be 

received directly by FMS, its fiscal or 

financial agents, and/or contractors. The 

records include names and mailing 

addresses only as necessary to deliver 

information to individuals about the 

benefits of electronic payments and the 

availability of a Treasury-recommended 

debit card account that can be used to 

receive payments electronically. 

Without such information, FMS would 

have significant difficulty in reaching 

low- to moderate-income individuals 

who may be receiving a tax refund 

payment to inform them about the 

benefits of electronic payments and the 

availability of the Treasuryrecommended debit card account for 

this purpose. 

In addition to the purposes cited 

above, the information contained in the 

covered records will be used to study 

the effectiveness to evaluate how the 

group responded to account options, 

and whether they utilized them. To 

study program efficacy, FMS may use its 

mailing list records to collect aggregate 

statistical information on the success 

and benefits of direct mail and the use 

of commercial database providers. 

FMS recognizes the sensitive nature 

of the confidential information it 

obtains when collecting individuals’ 

names and addresses, and has many 

safeguards in place to protect the 

information from theft or inadvertent 

disclosure. When appropriate, FMS’s 

arrangements with its fiscal and 

financial agents and contractors include 

requirements that preclude them from 

retaining, disclosing, and using the 

information for any purpose other than 

mailing of information about the benefit 

of electronic payments and account 

options and assessing the effectiveness 

of the outreach. In addition to various 

procedural and physical safeguards, 

access to computerized records is 

limited, through the use of access codes, 

encryption techniques and/or other 

internal mechanisms. Access to records 

is granted only as authorized by a 

business line manager at FMS or FMS’s 

fiscal or financial agent to those whose 

official duties require access solely for 

the purposes outlined in the proposed 

system. 

The new system of records report, as 

required by 5 U.S.C. 552a(r) of the 

Privacy Act, has been submitted to the 

Committee on Government Reform of 

the House of Representatives, the 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES