alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE> 1

               UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION  
                            WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
                                 FORM 10-Q/A


                      AMENDMENT TO APPLICATION OR REPORT
                  Files pursuant to Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of
                      THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


                         First Liberty Financial Corp.
                         -----------------------------
               (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)


                                AMENDMENT NO.  1 
                                              ---

The undersigned registrant hereby amends the following items,
financial statements, exhibits or other portion of its Quarterly
Report for the quarter ended December 31, 1996 on Form 10-Q as set
forth in the pages attached hereto.

Item 6.  Exhibit 27, Financial Data Schedule

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this amendment to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



                        FIRST LIBERTY FINANCIAL CORP.
                        -----------------------------




DATE:  May 14, 1997                      /s/ David L. Hall             
                                         ----------------------------
                                         David L. Hall
                                         Executive Vice President
                                         and Chief Financial Officer
                                         (Duly authorized, principal
                                          financial and principal
                                          accounting officer)







                                      1
09/05/2012 05:48 4252271007 ANM7 PAGE 02/03 

1 

2 

3 

1 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

·U 

12 

13 

14 

,,5 

16 

l'i 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

2:?. 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

29 

30 

3l. 

32 

33 

34 

35 

36 

37 

38 

39 

40 

41 

42 

43 

44 

45 

46 

47 

48 

49 

50 

51 

52 

53 

JEFFREY M. HARPER 

FAA OFFICE OF REGIONAL COlJNSEL 

1601. LIND AVENUE SOUTHWEST 

RENTON, WASHINGTON 98057 

TELEPHONE: (425) 227-2161 

FACSIMILE: ( 4:i5) 227-1007 

'Fll '·'(P I Lt p 2: 0 l ~ .. ·.~..... ,4- -

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

In the Matter of: 

Cornerstone Aviation, I11c. 

FAA Docket Nos.; Not Assigned 

DMS No. FAA-2011~0481 

DMS No. FAA-2011~0484 

DMS No. FAA-2011-0489 

NOTICE OF APPEAL 

NOTICE OF APPEAL 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.233, Complainant, by an.d through its undersigned counsel, hereby 

submits this Notice of its intent to appeal the Initial DeCision of Administrative Law Judge 

Richard C. Goodwin, service August 27, 2012. 

DATED this 6th. day of September, 2012. 

J.iH:!:-~ FAA Attorney 

Complainant's Notice of Appeal 

Cornerstone Avialion, Inc.- FAA-2011-D48l, FAA-2011-0484, 

FAA-2011-0489 

Pagel of2 

JEFFREY M. l-II\R'PER, FAA AITORNEY 

TEL: (425) 227-2161; FAX: (425) 227-1007 
09/05/2012 05:48 4252271007 ANM7 PAGE 03/03 

~ 

2 

3 

4 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

5 I hereby certify that the foregoing Notice of Appeal ha.s been served via facsimile and Certified· 

6 · Mail - Return Receipt Requ~sted. this date, to the following: · 7 

8 

9 

10 

ll 

12 

J.3 

l4 

15 

16 

17 

l.6 

19 

20 

/.l 

22 

:23 

24 

~5 

26 

27 

28 

29 

30 

31 

32 

33 

34 

--~35 

36 

37 

38 

3~ 

40 

4~ 

4~ 

43 

44 

45 

46 

47 

48 

49 

50 

51 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC.-430 

·Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl 000 

Federal Aviation Administration. 

800 Independence Avenue SW 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

FAX: 202.493.5020 

I hereby certify that the foregoing Notice of Appeal has been served via Certified Mail- Return 

Rec.eipt Requested this date, to the following: 

Susan Horstman 

Chief Ex~cutive Officer 

Cornerstone Aviation.; Inc. 

337 North 2370 West #130 

Salt Lake City, UT 84116 

Dated this 6tll day of September, 2012. 

J.~ER 4~~~ 1-------------omce of-Regiona.:r-Counsel-(A:NN.I::7)c----------------

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 LindA:ve. SW 

Renton, WA 98057 

(425) 227-2161 

Complainant's Notice of Appeal 

Cornerstone Aviation, Inc.- F AA"2011-04S I, F AA-20 ll-0484, 

FAA-2011-0489 

Page2 of2 

.Tm.l:lEY M. HAlu>ER, FAA AITORNEY 

TEL: (425) 227-2161; FAX: (425) 22H007
Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 40 Filed 05/16/2007 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Mark Mareske, Chief Financial Officer,certify that: 

 

1.        I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/Aof Logan County BancShares, Inc.;

 

2.        Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.        Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.        The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and have:

 

(a)              Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b)    [Reserved];

 

(c)              Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(d)              Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.        The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a)              All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)             Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: February 28,  2005 | /s/ Mark Mareske        |   |
|-------------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                          | Mark Mareske            |
|                          | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
252.236-7004 Payment for Mobilization and Demobilization.       As prescribed in                 236.570             (b)(2), use the following clause:          PAYMENT FOR MOBILIZATION AND DEMOBILIZATION (DEC 1991)          (a)  The Government will pay all costs for the mobilization and demobilization of all of the Contractor's plant and equipment at the contract lump sum price for this item.          (1)  ______ percent of the lump sum price upon completion of the contractor's mobilization at the work site.          (2)  The remaining ______ percent upon completion of demobilization.          (b)  The Contracting Officer may require the Contractor to furnish cost data to justify this portion of the bid if the Contracting Officer believes that the percentages in paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this clause do not bear a reasonable relation to the cost of the work in this contract.          (1)  Failure to justify such price to the satisfaction of the Contracting Officer will result in payment, as determined by the Contracting Officer, of—          (i)  Actual mobilization costs at completion of mobilization;          (ii)  Actual demobilization costs at completion of demobilization; and          (iii)  The remainder of this item in the final payment under this contract.          (2)  The Contracting Officer's determination of the actual costs in paragraph (b)(1)of this clause is not subject to appeal.          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 252.236 RESERVED
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-11-000056312-APR-201211:44 AM
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

I, N. Voloshin, Chief Financial Officer of Cavitation Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2013 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. § 78m); and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: February 26, 2014 | /s/ N. VOLOSHIN                                                       
|----------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        | Name: N. Voloshin
                      Title: Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Case 3:06-cv-00713-MHT-SRW Document 13 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00713-MHT-SRW Document 13 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00713-MHT-SRW Document 13 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 3 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00713-MHT-SRW Document 13-2 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00713-MHT-SRW Document 13-2 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00713-MHT-SRW Document 13-2 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 3 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-14 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 1 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-14 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 2 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-14 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 3 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-14 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 4 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-14 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 5 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-14 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 6 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-14 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 7 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-14 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 8 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-14 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 9 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-14 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 10 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-14 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 11 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-14 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 12 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-14 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 13 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-14 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 14 of 14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT

Re: Betty Weathers vs. Eli Lilly and Company, et al

 Civil Action No. 2:06cv666-CSC

The above-styled case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Susan R.

Walker.

Please note that the case number is now 2:06cv666-SRW. This new case

number should be used on all future correspondence and pleadings in this

action.

 

Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 7 Filed 07/27/2006 Page 1 of 1
19–008

108TH CONGRESS REPORT " HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ! 1st Session 108–1

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF S. 23, TO PROVIDE FOR A 5-MONTH 

EXTENSION OF THE TEMPORARY EXTENDED UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION ACT OF 2002 AND FOR A TRANSITION PERIOD FOR INDIVIDUALS RECEIVING COMPENSATION WHEN THE PROGRAM UNDER SUCH 

ACT ENDS

JANUARY 7, 2003.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. SESSIONS, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 14] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 14, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of S. 23, to provide for 

a 5-month extension of the Temporary Extended Unemployment 

Compensation Act of 2002 and for a transition period for individuals receiving compensation when the program under such Act 

ends, under a closed rule. The rule provides one hour of debate in 

the House, equally divided and controlled by Representative Thomas of California and Representative Rangel of New York. 

The rule waives all points of order against consideration of the 

bill. The rule provides that the bill shall be considered as read for 

amendment. The rule provides one motion to recommit. 

Finally, Section 2 of the rule provides that the allocations referred to in section 3(a)(4)(B)(i) of H. Res. 5 may be submitted by 

Representative Nussle of Iowa. 

COMMITTEE VOTES

Pursuant to clause 3(b) of House rule XIII the results of each 

record vote on an amendment or motion to report, together with 

the names of those voting for and against, are printed below: 

Rules Committee record vote No. 1

Date: January 7, 2003. 

2

Measure: S. 23. 

Motion by: Mr. Frost. 

Summary of motion: To make in order the amendment in the nature of a substitute offered by Mr. Rangel of New York, to extend 

unemployment benefits by 26 weeks. 

Results: Defeated 4 to 7. 

Vote by Members: Goss—Nay; Linder—Nay; Pryce—Nay; DiazBalart—Nay; Sessions—Nay; Reynolds—Nay; Frost—Yea; Slaughter—Yea; McGovern—Yea; Hastings (FL)—Yea; Dreier—Nay.

Æ
#### §§ 984.51-984.52 [Reserved]
Part 5242 - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT         SERVICES       Subpart 5242.1 - CONTRACT AUDIT SERVICES                                                         5242.191 Audit resolution and disposition.                                                                             Subpart 5242.6 - CORPORATE ADMINISTRATIVE CONTRACTING OFFICER                                                         5242.602 Assignment and location.                                                                             Subpart 5242.11 - PRODUCTION SURVEILLANCE AND REPORTING                                                         5242.1105 Assignment of criticality designator.    Subpart 5242.1 - CONTRACT AUDIT SERVICES     5242.191 Audit resolution and disposition.    (a) Resolution of findings/recommendations in reportable contract audit reports, as defined in DOD Instruction 7640.02, other than pre-award audits, is required within six months of report       issuance. When an audit’s findings/recommendations are resolved, they shall be supported, in the official contract file, by a negotiation memorandum, if applicable; a memorandum for the record; or other appropriate specific written documentation in the file. Disposition, including fund recovery actions, shall take place as soon as possible after resolution.       (b) HCAs are responsible for establishing procedures to accomplish audit resolution and disposition within the required times and to comply with the DOD Instruction 7640.02, Policy for Follow-Up on Contract Audit Reports. Semiannual (March 31 and September 30 of each year) reporting requirements shall be conducted through routine and timely entry of resolved, unresolved, dispositioned, or in litigation or investigation and document forward date within the CAFU DCMA eTools system at www.dcma.mil. If the resolution and disposition of reportable contract audit reports become over-age, documentation of actions taken to achieve resolution and disposition shall be recorded within the CAFU DCMA eTools system monthly. DASN(P) PA&BT is the DON liaison.Subpart 5242.6 - CORPORATE ADMINISTRATIVE CONTRACTING OFFICER     5242.602 Assignment and location.    (a) Submit recommendations for assignment of a          corporate administrative contracting officer (CACO) to DASN(P) by email at usn.pentagon.asstsecnavrdadc.mbx.pabt@us.navy.mil with          the subject “[Activity Name] DFARS 242.602 - CACO Assignment Recommendation.”Subpart 5242.11 - PRODUCTION SURVEILLANCE AND      REPORTING     5242.1105 Assignment of criticality      designator.    (1) The contracting officer shall determine the          appropriate criticality designator in conjunction with the program office or requiring          activity, for each contract.
252.225-7057 Preaward Disclosure of

Employment of Individuals Who Work in the

People’s Republic of China.

As prescribed in 225.7021-4(a), use the following provision:

PREAWARD DISCLOSURE OF EMPLOYMENT OF INDIVIDUALS WHO WORK IN THE PEOPLE’S

REPUBLIC OF CHINA (AUG 2022)

(a) Definitions. As used in this provision—

“Covered contract” and “covered entity” have the meaning given in the clause 252.225-7058,

Postaward Disclosure of Employment of Individuals Who Work in the People’s Republic of China.

(b) Prohibition on award. In accordance with section 855 of the National Defense Authorization Act

for Fiscal Year 2022 (Pub. L. 117-81, 10 U.S.C. 4651 note prec.), DoD may not award a contract to

the Offeror if it is a covered entity and proposes to employ one or more individuals who will perform

work in the People’s Republic of China on a covered contract, unless the Offeror has disclosed its

use of workforce and facilities in the People’s Republic of China.

(c) Preaward disclosure requirement. At the time of submission of an offer for a covered contract, an

Offeror that is a covered entity shall provide disclosures to include—

(1) The proposed use of workforce on a covered contract or subcontract, if the Offeror employs one

or more individuals who perform work in the People’s Republic of China;

(2) The total number of such individuals who will perform work in the People’s Republic of China;

and

(3) A description of the physical presence, including street address or addresses, in the People’s

Republic of China, where work on the covered contract will be performed.

(End of provision)

Parent topic: 252.225 RESERVED
#### § 97.153 Persons recognized.

Unless specifically authorized as provided in § 97.151, no person shall be permitted to file or advance applications before the Office on behalf of another person.
#### BACHARACH v. AMERICAN UNION REALTY CO.

(No. 5986.)

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 19, 1914.)

Appeal from Appellate Term, First Department. Action by .Sam Bacharach against the American Union Realty. Company. From a determination of the Appellate Term, affirming an order of the City Court denying plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, plaintiff appeals. Modified and affirmed.

Gustav Lange, Jr., of New York City, for appellant.

Henry G. Wiley, of New York City, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The notice of motion given by the plaintiff was for judgment on the pleadings. No motion was made by the defendant for judgment in his favor. We think the Special Term of the City Court correctly. denied the plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings; but, no motion having been made to sustain the demurrer, the order Should have been confined to a simple denial of the plaintiff’s motion, with $10 costs to the defendant. See Ventriniglia v. Eichner, 138 App. Div. 274, 122 N. Y. Supp. 966; Duff v. Queensbro Heights Land Corporation, 156 App. Div. 913, 141 N. Y. Supp. 1117. The determination appealed from, and the order of the City Court, are therefore modified as indicated, and, as so modified, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements of this appeal.
#### § 966.16 Fiscal period.

*Fiscal period* means the period beginning August 1 and ending July 31 following.
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-09-00585-CR

Michael Anthony BARQUIN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 7, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 272815

Honorable Brenda Chapman, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: November 18, 2009

DISMISSED

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal by withdrawing his notice of appeal. 

The motion is granted and this appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
#### In the Matter of Carol A. Siwek, Appellant-Respondent, v Cora Prantner, Respondent-Appellant, and Board of Elections of Erie County, Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs (see *Matter of Haynie v Mahoney,*48 NY2d 718; Election Law, § 8-308, subd 4; §§ 5-100, 5-400). (Appeal from order of Erie Supreme Court — Election Law.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Callahan and Witmer, JJ. (Decided Oct. 14,1980.)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6750

RYAN DARK WHITE, Name, as Attorney-In-Fact and representing the whole 

Class of Plaintiffs,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; ATTORNEY GENERAL ASHCROFT; 

ATTORNEY GENERAL GONZALEZ; ATTORNEY GENERAL HOLDER; 

ATTORNEY GENERAL LYNCH; ATTORNEY GENERAL SESSIONS; ROD 

ROSENSTEIN; DONNA HANSEN, Warden; LARRY HOGAN, Governor of the 

State of Maryland; MARTIN O’MALLEY, Governor of the State of Maryland; 

UNNAMED DEFENDANTS, 1-200,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:17-cv-01355-JKB)

Submitted: November 20, 2017 Decided: December 7, 2017

Before DIAZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ryan Dark White, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Ryan Dark White appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. See White v. United States, No. 1:17-cv-01355-JKB 

(D. Md. June 2, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED