alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Office of Justice Programs

          - [OJP (NIJ) Docket No. 1537]

# AGENCY:

National Institute of Justice.

# ACTION:

Notice of Draft NIJ Selection and Application Guide to Ballistic-Resistant Body Armor for Law Enforcement, Corrections, and Public Safety.

# SUMMARY:

                        In an effort to obtain comments from interested parties, the                               ( print page 78269)                            U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice (NIJ) will make available to the general public the draft “NIJ Selection and Application Guide to Ballistic-Resistant Body Armor for Law Enforcement, Corrections, and Public Safety.” The opportunity to provide comments on this document is open to industry technical representatives, criminal justice agencies and organizations, research, development and scientific communities, and all other stakeholders and interested parties. Those individuals wishing to obtain and provide comments on the draft document under consideration are directed to the following Web site:                         *http://www.justnet.org.*

# DATES:

The comment period will be open until January 21, 2011.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Casandra Robinson, by telephone at 202-305-2596 [                        **Note:**                         this is not a toll-free telephone number], or by e-mail at                         *casandra.robinson@usdoj.gov.*

Dr. John H. Laub,

Director, National Institute of Justice.

[FR Doc. 2010-31473 Filed 12-14-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-18-P
### IN THE UNI TED STATES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 11-20023 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. MANUEL LOPEZ VILLEDA, also known as Manuel Lopez , a l s o known as Manuel Villeda Lopez, also known as Manuel L. Villeda, also known as Manuel Lopez-Villeda, also known as Manuel Villeda- L o p e z, also known as Villeda M. Lopez, also known as Manuel Lopez-Villeoa, Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:10-CR-554-1
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, GARZA, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Manuel Lopez Villeda (Lop e z) h a s moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lopez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Februa ry 17 , 20 12 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 , the cour t hasd ete rm inedthat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 11-20023 Document: 00511761650 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/17/2012No. 11-20023

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s m o t i on for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 11-20023 Document: 00511761650 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/17/2012
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3183 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3183

To provide that certain vessel repairs done by United States crews are 
                          not subject to duty.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

   Mr. Lott introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide that certain vessel repairs done by United States crews are 
                          not subject to duty.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VESSEL REPAIR DUTIES.

    (a) Exemption.--Section 466(h) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 
1466(h)) is amended by striking paragraph (4) and inserting the 
following:
            ``(4) the cost of equipment, repair parts, and materials 
        that are installed on a vessel documented under the laws of the 
        United States and engaged in the foreign or coasting trade, if 
        the installation is done by members of the regular crew of such 
        vessel while the vessel is on the high seas, in foreign waters, 
        or in a foreign port, and does not involve foreign shipyard 
        repairs by foreign labor. Declaration and entry shall not be 
        required with respect to the installation, equipment, parts, 
        and materials described in this paragraph.''.
    (b) Amendment to HTS.--Subchapter XVIII of chapter 98 of the 
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by striking 
``U.S. Note'' and inserting ``U.S. Notes'' and by adding after U.S. 
note 1 the following new note:
``2. Notwithstanding the provisions of subheadings 9818.00.03 through 
9818.00.07, no duty shall apply to the cost of equipment, repair parts, 
and materials that are installed in a vessel documented under the laws 
of the United States and engaged in the foreign or coasting trade, if 
the installation is done by members of the regular crew of such vessel 
while the vessel is on the high seas, in foreign waters, or in a 
foreign port and does not involve foreign shipyard repairs by foreign 
labor. Declaration and entry shall not be required with respect to such 
installation, equipment, parts, and materials.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section apply to 
vessel equipment, repair parts, and materials installed on or after 
April 25, 2001.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 920.27 Alternate members.

An alternate member of the committee, during the absence of the member for whom that individual is an alternate, shall act in the place and stead of such member and perform such other duties as assigned. In the event both a member and his or her alternate are unable to attend a committee meeting, the committee may designate any other alternate member from the same district to serve in such member's place and stead. In the event of the death, removal, resignation, or disqualification of a member, the alternate of such member shall act for him or her until a successor for such member is selected and has qualified.

[79 FR 30445, May 28, 2014]
Case 2:06-cv-00707-ID-CSC Document 28 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00707-ID-CSC Document 28 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 2 of 2
408.1103 Contract requirements.

If the requirement includes the need for the vendor to provide operational maintenance such as

fueling, lubrication, or other fluid changes or replenishment, the contracting officer shall include in

the contract:

(1) A requirement for the use of fluids and lubricants containing the maximum available amounts of

recovered materials, and alternative fuels whenever available; and

(2) A preference for retreaded tires meeting the Federal retread specifications, tires with the

maximum recovered material content, or retreading services for the tires on the vehicle.

Parent topic: Subpart 408.11 - Leasing of Motor Vehicles
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.1



Amendment to Employment Agreement
This Fourth Amendment (this “Amendment”), dated as of March 6, 2018, to the Employment Agreement, made as of May 1, 2014 and as amended as of September 1, 2015, April 1, 2016 and December 6, 2016 (the “Employment Agreement”), between Florida Community Bank, National Association (the “Company”) and Kent Ellert (“Executive”).
WHEREAS, the Company and Executive now wish to further amend the Employment Agreement in accordance with the provisions of Section 7(n) of the Employment Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree to amend the Employment Agreement as set forth herein.
Section 1 of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
“1.    Term of Employment.  The term of employment under this Agreement shall commence as of May 1, 2014 (the “Effective Date”) and, subject to earlier termination as provided in Section 4 hereof, shall end on April 30, 2021 (the “Term”). For purposes of clarity, if Executive’s employment continues after the expiration of the Term, his employment shall be at-will.”
Except as specifically modified herein, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with all of the terms and conditions thereof.
This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall for all purposes be deemed an original, and all of which together shall constitute but one and the same instrument.  Signatures delivered by facsimile shall be effective for all purposes.








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this Amendment to be duly executed effective as of the date first written above.


	
		
	 
	FLORIDA COMMUNITY BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION




By:/s/ Vincent S. Tese


Name:Vincent S. Tese


Title:Executive Chairman



	 
	KENT ELLERT






/s/ Kent Ellert
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

JUAN WILLIAM ARRENDONDOLOPEZ, 

Petitioner

v.

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, 

Respondent

______________________

2023-2351

______________________

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. PH-0714-17-0438-C-1.

______________________

O R D E R

The petitioner having failed to file the required Entry 

of Appearance form by an attorney admitted to the bar of 

this court, and to file the required Statement Concerning 

Discrimination, and to file the brief required by Federal 

Circuit Rule 31 (a) within the time permitted, it is 

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the 

same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in 

Case: 23-2351 Document: 6 Page: 1 Filed: 11/17/2023
2 ARRENDONDOLOPEZ V. DVA

accordance with the rules. 

FOR THE COURT

November 17, 2023

Date /s/ Jarrett B. Perlow

Jarrett B. Perlow 

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: November 17, 2023

Case: 23-2351 Document: 6 Page: 2 Filed: 11/17/2023
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-30080 Conference Calendar

VEREL TRACY WESTOVER, SR., Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus LINDA JOHNSON ET. AL., Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 97-CV-1611

--------------------- August 18, 1998 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Verel Tracy Westover, Sr., appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint with prejudice under 42 U.S.C. § 1915(e) as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Westover contends that prison officials were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs. We have reviewed the record and Westover’s brief and DISMISS for essentially the same reasons adopted by the districtNo. 98-30080 - 2 - court. Westover v. Johnson , No. 97-1611 (W.D. La. Dec. 15, 1997). To the extent that Westover raises a separate claim for “assault and battery,” for the first time on appeal, this claim, does not rise to the level of plain error. See Robertson v. Plano City of Texas , 70 F.3d 21, 23 (5th Cir. 1995). Westover’s appeal is without merit and therefore frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2 . We caution Westover that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Westover is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous. APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
Subpart 1337.1 - Service Contracts - General

Parent topic: PART 1337 - SERVICE CONTRACTING

1337.110 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.

1337.110-70 Personnel security processing requirements.

(a) CAM 1337.70 establishes procedures for personnel security processing for contractors

performing services on or within a Department of Commerce facility or through an information

technology (IT) system, as required by the Department of Commerce Security Manual and

Department of Commerce Security Program Policy and Minimum Implementation Standards.

(b) Insert clause 1352.237-70, Security Processing Requirements - High or Moderate Risk Contracts,

in all service contracts designated as High or Moderate risk that will be performed on a DOC facility

or when the contractor will access a DOC IT system.

(c) Insert clause 1352.237-71, Security Processing Requirements - Low Risk Contracts, in all service

contracts designated as Low Risk that will be performed on or within a Department of Commerce

facility or when the contractor will access a DOC IT system.

(d) Insert clause 1352.237-72, Security Processing Requirements - National Security Contracts, in all

service contracts designated as National Security Contracts that will be performed on or within a

Department of Commerce facility or when the contractor will access a DOC IT system.

(e) Insert clause 1352.237-73, Foreign National Visitor and Guest Access to Departmental

Resources, in all DOC solicitations and contracts for services where foreign national access to any

DOC facility or DOC IT system is required. The language of the clause may only be modified by

adding more restrictive agency or operating unit counsel-specific guidance.

1337.110-71 Additional DOC clauses related to service

contracting.

(a) Insert a clause substantially similar to 1352.237-74, Progress Reports, where progress reports

are required in order to make periodic payments based upon contract progress made, or if the

contracting officer otherwise determines that progress reports are needed.

(b) Insert a clause substantially similar to 1352.237-75, Key Personnel, when contract performance

requires identification of contractor key personnel.
Case 2:06-cv-00651-MEF-SRW Document 2 Filed 07/21/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00651-MEF-SRW Document 2 Filed 07/21/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00651-MEF-SRW Document 2 Filed 07/21/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00651-MEF-SRW Document 2 Filed 07/21/2006 Page 4 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00651-MEF-SRW Document 2-2 Filed 07/21/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00651-MEF-SRW Document 2-2 Filed 07/21/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00651-MEF-SRW Document 2-2 Filed 07/21/2006 Page 3 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00651-MEF-SRW Document 2-3 Filed 07/21/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00651-MEF-SRW Document 2-3 Filed 07/21/2006 Page 2 of 2
§ 945.85 Effect of termination or amendments. ( a ) Unless otherwise expressly provided by the Secretary, the termination of this subpart or of any regulation issued pursuant to this subpart, or the issuance of any amendments to either thereof, shall not ( 1 ) affect or waive any right, duty, obligation, or liability which shall have arisen or which may thereafter arise in connection with any provision of this subpart or any regulation issued under this subpart, or
( 2 ) release or extinguish any violation of this subpart or of any regulation issued under this subpart, or
( 3 ) affect or impair any rights or remedies of the Secretary or of any other person with respect to any such violation.
( b ) The persons who are committee members and alternates on the effective date of this subpart shall continue in office until their successors have been selected and have qualified. All rules and regulations issued or approved by the Secretary pursuant to this part (Order No. 945, as amended) and not in conflict herewith, which are in effect immediately prior to the date of this amendment shall continue in effect under this subpart as originally issued, or subsequently modified, until such rules and regulations are changed, modified, or suspended in accordance with this subpart.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                  CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, Shawn Qu, Chief Executive Officer of Canadian Solar Inc. (the
"Company"), certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of the Company;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

      4. The Company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and we have:

            (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

            (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls
      and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
      covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered
      by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
      to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial
      reporting; and

      5. The Company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the Company's auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

<PAGE>

            (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
      design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

            (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
      other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal
      control over financial reporting.

Date: May 29, 2007

By:    /s/ Shawn Qu
    -----------------------------------
Name:  Shawn Qu
Title: Chief Executive Officer
611.002 Policy.

Parent topic: PART 611—DESCRIBING AGENCY NEEDS
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 20180 Summary Calendar

RILEY OLIVE , Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.
CLAY DEVELOPMENT & CONSTRUCTION , Defendant

- Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:13

- CV

- 3181

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT , and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Riley Olive , proceeding in forma pauperis, appeals the dismissal of his civil complaint. The district court construed Olive’s complaint as asserting claims of age discrimination, see 29 U.S.C. § 631(a), and retaliation, see 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

- 3, as well as c laims of assault, breach of imp lied contract, and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing arising under Texas law

. The district court dismissed with prejudice the federal claims pursuant to

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 11, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-20180 Document: 00512866096 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/11/2014No. 14

- 20180

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) . In addition, the court dismissed the

st ate law claims without prejudice, declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over them. Olive provides no argument and cites no cases or statutes pertinent to any claim raised in the district court. Consequently, he has abandoned any appellate claims by failing to brief them. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222,
224

- 25 (5th Cir. 1993) ; Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987)

. AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 14-20180 Document: 00512866096 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/11/2014