alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6264 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LEON MASON, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:01-

cr-00538-JFM; 1:05-cv-03382-JFM)

Submitted: May 18, 2006 Decided: June 1, 2006

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leon Mason, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Jane Meadowcroft Erisman,

Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Leon Mason, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s

order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion as successive.

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000); see Jones v. Braxton, 392 F.3d 683, 688 (4th Cir. 2004)

(holding certificate of appealability is required to appeal from

dismissal of 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition as unauthorized and

successive). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent

“a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard

by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Mason has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Case 2:06-cv-00633-MEF-VPM Document 2 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00633-MEF-VPM Document 2 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00633-MEF-VPM Document 2 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 3 of 3
Subpart 1445.3 - Authorizing the Use and

Rental of Government Property

Parent topic: PART 1445 - GOVERNMENT PROPERTY

1445.302 Contracts with foreign governments or

international organizations.

The HCA, after coordinating with the cognizant PMO, shall establish procedures to recover use costs

when foreign governments or international organizations request use of Government production and

research property
#### § 948.2 Act.

*Act* means Public Act No. 10 73d Congress, as amended and as reenacted and amended by the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (sections 1-19, 48 Stat. 31, as amended; 7 U.S.C. 601-674).
#### SPINELLI v. McMULLEN, SNARE & TREIST, Inc.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

June 18, 1914.)

Master and Servant (§ 252*)—Injuries to Servant—Employers’ Liability Act.

Service .of notice in conformity with the statute is a condition precedent to the right of a servant to recover under the Employers’ Liability Act (Consol. Laws, c. 31, §§ 200-204).

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Master and Servant, Cent. Dig. § 806; Dec. Dig. § 252.*]

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of the Bronx, Second District.

*212Personal injury action by Alfonso Spinelli, by Fiore Spinelli, his guardian ad litem, against McMullen, Snare & Treist, Incorporated. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

Reversed, and complaint dismissed.

Argued June term, 1914, before SEABURY, PAGE, and BIJUR, JJ.

Halsey, Kiernan & O’Keefe, of New York City (John R. Halsey, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Domenick A. Montani, of New York City, for respondent.

*

For other cases see same topic & § number in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep’r Indexes

PER CURIAM.

The service of a notice in conformity to the statute was a condition precedent to the plaintiff's right to recover. The alleged notice served did not comply with the statute. Logerto v. Central Building Co., 198 N. Y. 390, 91 N. E. 782.

Judgment reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.
161 So.2d 278

#### Loudis PARISH v. STANDARD ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 47090.

March 11, 1964.

In re: Standard Accident Insurance Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Natchitoches. 158 So.2d 892.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, we find no error of law in its judgment.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

LONNIE CAMMON, #236498, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-CV-674-WKW 

)

DR. SEDIET, et al., )

)

 Defendants. )

RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Lonnie Cammon [“Cammon”], a state inmate, filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action on

July 31, 2006. In this complaint, Cammon challenges the medical treatment provided to

him during his confinement at Bullock County Correctional Facility and Ventress

Correctional Facility. The court recently ascertained that Cammon no longer resides at the

last address he provided for service. The order of procedure entered in this case

specifically directed Cammon to immediatelyinformthe court of any change in his address.

Order of August 2, 2006 - Court Document No. 4 at 5. As is clear from the foregoing,

Cammon has failed to comply with this directive and this case cannot properly proceed in

his absence. The court therefore concludes that this case is due to be dismissed.

Accordingly, it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that this case

be dismissed without prejudice for failure of the plaintiff to comply with the orders of this

court. It is further 

ORDERED that on or before February 17, 2009 the parties may file objections to

Case 2:06-cv-00674-WKW-TFM Document 27 Filed 01/29/09 Page 1 of 2
2

the Recommendation. Any objections filed must specifically identify the findings in the

Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation to which the party is objecting. Frivolous, conclusive

or general objections will not be considered by the District Court. The parties are advised

that this Recommendation is not a final order of the court and, therefore, it is not

appealable.

Failure to file written objections to the proposed findings and advisements in the

Magistrate Judge's Recommendation shall bar the party from a de novo determination by

the District Court of issues covered in the Recommendation and shall bar the party from

attacking on appeal factual findings in the Recommendation accepted or adopted by the

District Court except upon grounds of plain error or manifest injustice. Nettles v.

Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404 (5th Cir. 1982). See Stein v. Reynolds Securities, Inc., 667 F.2d

33 (11th Cir. 1982). See also Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206 (11th Cir. 1981,

en banc), adopting as binding precedent all of the decisions of the former Fifth Circuit

 handed down prior to the close of business on September 30, 1981.

Done this 29th day of January, 2009.

/s/Terry F. Moorer 

TERRY F. MOORER 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00674-WKW-TFM Document 27 Filed 01/29/09 Page 2 of 2
EX-35 (f)
(logo) imb
IndymacBank


REG AB 1123 Statement of Compliance


I am an authorized officer for IndyMac Bank, F.S.B, the servicer for the
transactions listed on the attached schedule and I certify:

a) A review of IndyMac Bank's activities during the reporting period and of its
performance under the applicable servicing agreement has been made under my
supervision.

b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, except as set forth below
IndyMac Bank has fulfilled all of its obligations under the agreement in all
material respects throughout the reporting period.

c) None


By: /s/ Robert M. Abramian
Robert M. Abramian
First Vice President
Home Loan Servicing
Investor Reporting
Indymac Bank


By: /s/ Bart Vincent
Bart Vincent
First Vice President
HLS-Finance
Financial
Indymac Bank


Prepared for: Wells Fargo Bank

Date: February 28, 2007

Ref: EXHIBIT A


www.indymacbank.com

7700 W. Parmer Lane, Bldg D, Austin, TX 78729
Tel: 512.250.2700


(page)


EXHIBIT A

849 GSR 2006-1F 1/30/06
902 BSALTA 2006-1 1/30/06
840 DBALT 2006-AR1 1/31/06
918 BAYVIEW 2006-A 02/08/06
213 GSR 2006-2F
214 GSR 2006-3F 03-30-06
159 GSR 2006-0A1 8/24/06
229 MASTR 2006-1 03-29-06
223 DBALT 2006-AF1 03-31-06
231 HARBORVIEW 2006-2
233 LUMINENT 2006-3 (4-28-06)
287 LUMINENT 2006-5 (6-29-06)
454 LUMINENT CONDUIT 12MAT WLS 11/27/06
5001 LUMINENT 12MAT CONDUIT WLS 12/27/06
235 BAFC 2006-D 04/28/06
219 GSR 2006-5F 5/26/06
809 GSR 2006-6F (GS) 6/30/06
808 HARBORVIEW 2006-6 6/30/06
807 DBALTA 2006-AR 2 6/30/06
921 BSALTA 2006-4 6/30/06
285 MALT 2006-3 (6-30-06)
141 BSALTA 2006-5 7/28/06
278 GSAMP 2006-S4 (6-9-06)
199 HARBORVIEW 2006-8 (GW) 8/30/06
430 LUMINENT 2006-6 092806
432 MLMI 2006-F1 (ML) 09/29/06
379 CSMC 2006-8 09/29/06
378 BAFC 2006-H 9/29/06
178 MARM 2006-0A2 11/15/06
296 GSAA 2006-17 10/30/06
297 DBALT 2006-AR5 10/30/06
442 CSMC 2006-9 10/30/2006
440 ITF CSAB 2006-3 10/31/2006
456 JPALT 2006-S4 11/29/06
457 BCAP 2006-AA2 11/30/2006
458 ACE 2006-SD3 11/30/06
4101 DBALT 2006-AR6 12/15/06
4102 HARBORVIEW 2006-14 12/22/06
4103 MSM 2006-17XS 12/28/06
4104 GSR 2006-10F 12/29/06
4110 LUMINENT 2006-7 12/14/2006
4105 JPMMT 2006-S4 12/21/06
4106 GSAA 2006-20 12/29/06
4111 BSALTA 2006-8 12/28/06
Editorial Note on Part 94
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 94 appear at 61 FR 51352, Oct. 2 1996.

§ 94.104 Fees and charges. ( a ) The fee charged for any single laboratory analysis of voluntary egg product samples shall be obtained from the schedules of charges in paragraph (a) of § 91.37 of this subchapter.
( b ) The charge for any requested laboratory analysis not listed shall be based on the standard hourly rate specified in § 91.37, paragraph (b).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-02-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-01-2000
<CASH>                                           2,129
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,251
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,932
<INVENTORY>                                     28,824
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,538
<PP&E>                                         161,408
<DEPRECIATION>                                  83,741
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 262,533
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           71,565
<BONDS>                                        261,418
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     39,730
<COMMON>                                            74
<OTHER-SE>                                   (116,887)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   262,533
<SALES>                                        179,213
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               180,469
<CGS>                                           57,217
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  166,065
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,704
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    700
<INCOME-TAX>                                       966
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (266)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (266)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3261 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3261

   To suspend temporarily the duty on porcelain lamp-holder housings 
                          containing sockets.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 26, 2006

Mr. Frist (for Mrs. Dole) introduced the following bill; which was read 
             twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on porcelain lamp-holder housings 
                          containing sockets.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN PORCELAIN LAMP-HOLDER HOUSINGS CONTAINING SOCKETS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.85.31        Porcelain lamp-holder   Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           housings containing                                               31/2009          ''
                           sockets (provided for                                                               .
                           in subheading
                           8536.61.00)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3147 

To clarify the article description and rate of duty for certain tractor body 

parts. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. CHAMBLISS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To clarify the article description and rate of duty for certain 

tractor body parts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN TRACTOR BODY PARTS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 87 of the Harmonized 

5 Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by strik6 ing subheadings 8708.29.10 through 8708.29.50, and in7 serting the following new subheadings and superior text, 

8 with the article description for subheading 8708.29.05 and 

9 the superior text to subheading 8708.29.40 having the 

10 same degree of indentation as the article description for 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 3147 IS 

1 subheading 8708.31.10, and with the article descriptions 

2 for subheadings 8708.29.40 through 8708.29.49 having 

3 the same degree of indentation as the article description 

4 for subheading 8708.70.05: 

‘‘ 8708.29.05 For tractors suitable for agricultural use .......................................... Free Free 

For other motor vehicles: 

8708.29.40 Inflators and modules for air 

bags ................................................. 2.5% Free (A, AU, 

B, CA, CL, E, 

IL, J, JO, MA, 

MX, P, SG) 25% 

8708.29.43 Door assembles ........................ 2.5% Free (A, AU, 

B, CA, CL, E, 

IL, J, JO, MA, 

MX, P, SG) 25% 

8708.29.46 Body stampings ....................... 2.5% Free (A, AU, 

B, CA, CL, E, 

IL, J, JO, MA, 

MX, P, SG) 25% 

8708.29.49 Other ....................................... 2.5% Free (A, AU, 

B, CA, CL, E, 

IL, J, JO, MA, 

MX, P, SG) 25% ’’. 

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

6 subsection (a) apply to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

7 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

8 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
SUBCHAPTER F - SPECIAL CATEGORIES OF

CONTRACTING

PART 935 - RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING

PART 936 - CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS

PART 937 - SERVICE CONTRACTING

PART 939 - ACQUISITION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

PART 941 - ACQUISITION OF UTILITY SERVICES

PART 935 - RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING

935.010 Scientific and technical reports.

935.070 Research misconduct.

935.071 Contract clause.

PART 936 - CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS

Subpart 936.2 - Special Aspects of Contracting for Construction

936.202-70 [Reserved]

936.202-71 Specifications.

Subpart 936.6 - Architect-Engineer Services

936.602-70 DOE selection criteria.

936.609-3 Work oversight in architect-engineer contracts.

Subpart 936.7 [Reserved]

Subpart 936.71 - Inspection and Acceptance

936.7100 Scope of subpart.

936.7101 Construction contracts.

PART 937 - SERVICE CONTRACTING

Subpart 937.2 - Advisory and Assistance Services

937.204 Guidelines for determining availability of personnel.

Subpart 937.70 - Protective Services Contracting

937.7040 Contract clauses.

PART 939 - ACQUISITION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

Subpart 939.70 - Implementing DOE Policies and Procedures

939.7000 Scope.

939.7001 [Reserved]

939.7002 Contractor acquisition of information technology.

PART 941 - ACQUISITION OF UTILITY SERVICES

Subpart 941.2 - Acquiring Utility Services

941.201-70 DOE Directives.

941.201-71 Use of subcontracts.
Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 77 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 77 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 77 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 77 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 4 of 4
**EXHIBIT 31.2** **Section 302    Certification of Principal Financial Officer**     I, Frederic T. Boyer, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on    Form 10-Q    of Qualstar Corporation;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this report, fairly    present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I    are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure    controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is    being prepared;     (b) [Paragraph (b) is omitted pursuant to SEC    Release Nos.    33-8238 and    34-47986]     (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation; and     (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably    likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal    control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Dated: May 12, 2006/s/  FREDERIC    T. BOYER    Frederic T. Boyer    Chief Financial Officer
#### § 987.48 Container regulation.

Whenever the Committee deems it advisable to establish a container regulation for any variety of dates, it shall recommend to the Secretary the size, capacity, weight, or pack of the container, or containers, which may be used in the handling or packaging of dates, or both. If the Secretary finds upon the basis of such recommendation or other information available to him that such container regulation would tend to effectuate the declared policy of the act he shall establish such regulation and notice thereof showing the effective date shall be sent by the Committee to all handlers of record. After the effective date of such regulation, no handler shall handle dates of such variety except in accordance with such regulation and all other applicable requirements in effect pursuant to this part.
Case 2:06-cv-00701-ID-CSC Document 17 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 1 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00701-ID-CSC Document 17 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 2 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00701-ID-CSC Document 17 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 3 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00701-ID-CSC Document 17 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 4 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00701-ID-CSC Document 17 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 5 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00701-ID-CSC Document 17 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 6 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00701-ID-CSC Document 17 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 7 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00701-ID-CSC Document 17 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 8 of 8
#### § 956.202 Assessment rate.

On and after January 1, 2023, an assessment rate of $0.20 per 50-pound bag or equivalent is established for Walla Walla sweet onions.

[88 FR 69879, Oct. 10, 2023]
#### § 905.20 Term of office.

The term of office of members and alternate members shall begin on the first day of August of even-numbered years and continue for two years and until their successors are selected and have qualified. The consecutive terms of office of a member shall be limited to two terms. The terms of office of alternate members shall not be so limited. Members, their alternates, and their respective successors shall be nominated and selected by the Secretary as provided in §§ 905.22 and 905.23.

[81 FR 10455, Mar. 1, 2016]
###### Editorial Note on Part 91

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 91 appear at 61 FR 51350, Oct. 2 1996.

#### § 91.1 General.

This part consolidates the procedural and administrative rules of the Science and Technology Program of the Agricultural Marketing Service for conducting the analytical testing and laboratory audit verification and accreditation services. It also contains the fees and charges applicable to such services.

[85 FR 62942, Oct. 6, 2020]
427.104 General guidance.

As used in FAR part 27, the agency head or agency head designee is the Senior Procurement

Executive, except under FAR 27.306(a) and (b). Under FAR 27.306(a) and (b), the agency head is the

Secretary without power of redelegation.

Parent topic: Subpart 427.1 - General