Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Notices 8115 

Commission set a bond of five percent 

of entered value of accused products 

imported during the period of 

Presidential review. 

On October 30, 2009, SCT and Barber 

(‘‘SCT–Barber’’) filed a joint petition for 

review of the final ID. Tianrui filed a 

petition for review on November 2, 

2009, and complainant Amsted filed a 

contingent petition for review that same 

day. Amsted filed responses to SCT– 

Barber’s and Tianrui’s petitions on 

November 9 and 10, respectively, and 

SCT–Barber and Tianrui filed their 

responses to Amsted’s petition on 

November 10. The Commission 

investigative attorneys (‘‘IAs’’) filed 

responses to the various petitions for 

review on November 10. The IAs did 

not petition for review of the ID. 

On December 17, 2009, the 

Commission determined not to review 

the ID and requested briefing on 

remedy, the public interest, and 

bonding. 74 FR 68282–83 (Dec. 23, 

2009). On December 29, 2009, the 

parties submitted written submissions 

on the issues for which the Commission 

requested further briefing, and 

submitted replies to the written 

submissions on January 6, 2010. 

Having reviewed the record in this 

investigation, including the ID and the 

parties’ written submissions, the 

Commission has determined that the 

appropriate remedy is a limited 

exclusion order lasting a period of ten 

(10) years as well as cease and desist 

orders, lasting the same period, directed 

to Respondents. The limited exclusion 

order prohibits the entry of cast steel 

railway wheels and products containing 

same, manufactured using any of the 

asserted ABC Trade Secrets by or on 

behalf of, or imported by or on behalf 

of, Respondents, or any of their 

affiliated companies, parents, 

subsidiaries, or other related business 

entities, or their successors or assigns, 

for consumption in the United States. 

The cease and desist orders prohibit 

Respondents from importing, selling, 

marketing, advertising, distributing, 

offering for sale, transferring (except for 

exportation), soliciting U.S. agents or 

distributors, or aiding or abetting other 

entities in the importation, sale for 

importation, sale after importation, 

transfer (except for exportation), or 

distribution of cast steel railway wheels 

and products containing the same 

manufactured using any of the asserted 

ABC Trade Secrets. 

The Commission further determines 

that the public interest factors 

enumerated in section 337(d) and (f) (19 

U.S.C. 1337(d), (f)) do not preclude 

issuance of the limited exclusion order. 

Finally, the Commission determines 

that a bond of five percent of the entered 

value is required to permit temporary 

importation during the period of 

Presidential review (19 U.S.C. 1337(j)) 

of cast steel railway wheels and 

products containing the same that are 

subject to the order. The Commission’s 

order and opinion were delivered to the 

President and to the United States Trade 

Representative on the day of their 

issuance. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in 

sections 210.50 of the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 

210.50. 

Issued: February 16, 2010. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–3421 Filed 2–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–672] 

In the Matter of Certain Electronic 

Devices Having Image Capture or 

Display Functionality and Components 

Thereof; Notice of a Commission 

Determination Not To Review an Initial 

Determination Terminating the 

Investigation Based on a Settlement 

Agreement 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) 

(Order No. 19) of the presiding 

administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) 

terminating the above-captioned 

investigation based on a settlement 

agreement. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–3115. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// 

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on March 30, 2009, based on a 

complaint filed by LG Electronics of 

Seoul, Korea (‘‘LG’’), alleging a violation 

of section 337 in the importation, sale 

for importation, and sale within the 

United States after importation of 

certain electronic devices having image 

capture or display functionality or 

components thereof by reason of 

infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent Nos. 5,995,767, 5,774,131, and 

6,281,895. 74 FR 14157 (2009). The 

complainant named Eastman Kodak 

Company of Rochester, New York 

(‘‘Kodak’’) as the respondent. 

On December 16, 2009, LG and Kodak 

jointly moved to terminate the 

investigation based on a settlement 

agreement. The Commission 

investigative attorney supported the 

motion. 

On January 19, 2010, the ALJ issued 

an ID (Order No. 19) granting the 

motion. No party petitioned for review 

of the ID, and the Commission has 

determined not to review it. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in 

sections 210.21 and 210.42(h) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.21, 210.42(h). 

Issued: February 16, 2010. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–3420 Filed 2–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Notice Pursuant to the National 

Cooperative Research and Production 

Act of 1993—Institute of Electrical and 

Electronics Engineers 

Notice is hereby given that, on 

January 8, 2010, pursuant to Section 6(a) 

of the National Cooperative Research 

and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 

4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), the Institute of 

Electrical and Electronics Engineers 

(‘‘IEEE’’) has filed written notifications 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

8116 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Notices 

simultaneously with the Attorney 

General and the Federal Trade 

Commission disclosing additions or 

changes to its standards development 

activities. The notifications were filed 

for the purpose of extending the Acts 

provisions limiting the recovery of 

antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages 

under specified circumstances. 

Specifically, 31 new standards have 

been initiated and 21 existing standards 

are being revised. More detail regarding 

these changes can be found at http://

standards.ieee.org/standardswire/ 

sba/ll-2009.html and http://standards.

ieee.org/standardswire/sba/l2-09- 

09.html. 

On September 17, 2004, IEEE filed its 

original notification pursuant to Section 

6(a) of the Act. The Department of 

Justice published a notice in the Federal 

Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the 

Act on November 3, 2004 (69 FR 64105). 

The last notification was filed with 

the Department on December 28, 2009. 

A notice was published in the Federal 

Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the 

Act on January 19, 2010 (75 FR 2890). 

Patricia A. Brink, 

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2010–3085 Filed 2–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE M 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Notice Pursuant to the National 

Cooperative Research and Production 

Act of 1993—Ice Crystal Consortium 

Notice is hereby given that, on 

December 31, 2009, pursuant to Section 

6(a) of the National Cooperative 

Research and Production Act of 1993, 

15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), the Ice 

Crystal Consortium (‘‘ICC’’) has filed 

written notifications simultaneously 

with the Attorney General and the 

Federal Trade Commission disclosing 

changes in its membership. The 

notifications were filed for the purpose 

of extending the Act’s provisions 

limiting the recovery of antitrust 

plaintiffs to actual damages under 

specified circumstances. Specifically, 

Airbus SAS, Toulouse, FRANCE has 

been added as a party to this venture. 

No other changes have been made in 

either the membership or planned 

activity of the group research project. 

On July 28, 2009, ICC filed its original 

notification pursuant to section 6(a) of 

the Act. The Department of Justice 

published a notice in the Federal 

Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the 

Act on August 26, 2009 (74 FR 43157). 

Patricia A. Brink, 

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2010–3088 Filed 2–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE M 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Notice Pursuant to the National 

Cooperative Research and Production 

Act of 1993—Network Centric 

Operations Industry Consortium, Inc. 

Notice is hereby given that, on 

January 11, 2010, pursuant to Section 

6(a) of the National Cooperative 

Research and Production Act of 1993, 

15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’) 

Network Centric Operations Industry 

Consortium, Inc. has filed written 

notifications simultaneously with the 

Attorney General and the Federal Trade 

Commission disclosing changes in its 

membership. The notifications were 

filed for the purpose of extending the 

Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of 

antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages 

under specified circumstances. 

Specifically, General Dynamics, Falls 

Church, VA; STM (Savunma 

Teknolojileri Muhendislik ve Ticaret 

A.S.), Ankara, TURKEY; Twisted Pair 

Solutions, Inc., Seattle, WA; TKC 

Communications, LLC, Fairfax, VA; 

Huneed Technologies, Gunpo-si, 

Gyeonggi-do, REPUBLIC OF KOREA; 

Telindus, Heverlee, BELGIUM; 

Bellcomm Information Systems, Madrid, 

Madrid, SPAIN; and SenseResponder 

LLC, San Diego, CA have withdrawn as 

parties to this venture. 

No other changes have been made in 

either the membership or planned 

activity of the group research project. 

Membership in this group research 

project remains open, and NCOIC 

intends to file additional written 

notifications disclosing all changes in 

membership. 

On November 19, 2004, NCOIC filed 

its original notification pursuant to 

Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department 

of Justice published a notice in the 

Federal Register pursuant to section 

6(b) of the Act on February 2, 2005 (70 

FR 5486). 

The last notification was filed with 

the Department on October 26, 2009. A 

notice was published in the Federal 

Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the 

Act on November 30, 2009 (74 FR 

62600). 

Patricia A. Brink, 

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2010–3086 Filed 2–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE M 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Notice Pursuant to the National 

Cooperative Research and Production 

Act of 1993—Joint Venture Under Tip 

Award No. 70NANB10H009 

Notice is hereby given that, on 

January 15, 2010, pursuant to Section 

6(a) of the National Cooperative 

Research and Production Act of 1993, 

15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), the 

Joint Venture under TIP Award No. 

70NANB10H009 (‘‘JV TIP H009’’) has 

filed written notifications 

simultaneously with the Attorney 

General and the Federal Trade 

Commission disclosing (1) the identities 

of the parties to the venture and (2) the 

nature and objectives of the venture. 

The notifications were filed for the 

purpose of invoking the Act’s provisions 

limiting the recovery of antitrust 

plaintiffs to actual damages under 

specified circumstances. 

Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, 

the identities of the parties to the 

venture are: wTe Corporation, Bedford, 

MA; Energy Research Company, Staten 

Island, NY; and National Recovery 

Technologies, Inc., Nashville, TN. The 

general area of JV TIP H009’s planned 

activity is to develop, scale-up and 

integrate transformational technologies 

for high-speed scrap sortation of mixed 

metals by alloy type, and for real-time, 

molten metal analysis of hightemperature alloys. 

Patricia A. Brink, 

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2010–3084 Filed 2–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–11–M 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES