alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-40922

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

HERMAN OTONIEL LOPEZ JUAREZ, also known as Genaro Antonio Cruz

Garcia,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:11-CR-464-1

Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Herman Otoniel Lopez Juarez has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th

Cir. 2011). Lopez Juarez has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief

and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Lopez

Juarez’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 19, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-40922 Document: 00511891512 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/19/2012
No. 11-40922

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

Case: 11-40922 Document: 00511891512 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/19/2012
§ 784.1 Applicability. ( a ) Subject to the availability of funds, this part establishes terms and conditions under which the 2004 Ewe Lamb Replacement and Retention Payment Program will be administered.
( b ) Unless otherwise determined by the Farm Service Agency (FSA) in accordance with the provisions of this part, the amount that may be expended under this part for program payments shall not exceed $18 million. Claims that exceed that amount will be prorated in accordance with § 784.7.
( c ) To be eligible for payments, producers must comply with all provisions of this part and with any other conditions imposed by FSA.
728.313 Contract clauses for insurance of

transportation or transportation-related

services.

(a) USAID is required by law to include language in all its direct contracts and subcontracts

ensuring that all U.S. marine insurance companies have a fair opportunity to bid for marine

insurance when such insurance is necessary or appropriate under the contract. USAID has therefore

established a supplementary preface to the clause at (48 CFR) FAR 52.228–9. This supplementary

preface is set forth in (48 CFR) AIDAR 752.228–9, and is required for use in any USAID-direct

contract where marine insurance is necessary or appropriate.

Parent topic: Subpart 728.3—Insurance
4001
      Leadenhall Road


Mt.
      Laurel, NJ 08054






March
        7,
        2007
 
 AURORA
        LOAN SERVICES LLC
 Annual
        Reporting PHH Mortgage (formerly Cendant Mortgage)
 10350
        Park Meadows Drive
 Mailstop
        3199
 Littleton,
        CO 80124
 
 Re:
        Supplemental Servicer Compliance Statement
 
 Deal
          Name: LXS 2006-15
 Dear
        Sir
        and/or Madame:
  This
        statement of compliance is being provided in accordance with Item 1123 of
        Regulation AB. The Undersigned hereby states that:
 
 1.
            I
                am an authorized officer of PHH Mortgage Corporation (the
                “Servicer”); 
 2.
            A
                review of the Servicer’s activities during the period from 09/01/2006 (the
                “Reporting Period”) and its performance under the Agreement has been made
                under my supervision; and 
 3.
            To
                the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
                fulfilled
                all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
                throughout the Reporting Period. 
  By: 
        /s/ Deborah A. Rocchi
 Name:
        Deborah A. Rocchi
 Title:
        Assistant Vice President





4001
        Leadenhall Road
 Mt.
        Laurel, NJ 08054
 March
            7,
            2007
 
 AURORA
            LOAN SERVICES LLC
 Annual
            Reporting PHH Mortgage (formerly Cendant Mortgage)
 10350
            Park Meadows Drive
 Mailstop
            3199
 Littleton,
            CO 80124
   Deal
            Name: LXS 2006-15
 
 Dear
            Sir
            and/or Madame:
  Enclosed,
              please find a Supplemental Statement to the Annual Statement as to Compliance
              (1123 Statement). This Supplemental Statement is issued pursuant to
              the Annual
              Statement as to Compliance (1123 Statement) dated February 28,
              2007.
  We
              are
              providing this supplement to further specify the material instance
              of
              noncompliance referred to in paragraph (a) of the Annual Statement
              of
              Compliance.
  /s/
                Deborah A. Rocchi
 Deborah Rocchi
 Assistant
                Vice President
 Date: 
                March 7, 2007
#### § 948.215 Assessment rate.

On or after July 1, 2005, an assessment rate of $0.02 per hundredweight is established for Colorado Area No. 3 potatoes.

[70 FR 36816, June 27, 2005]
§ 925.30 Procedure. ( a ) Six members of the committee shall constitute a quorum, including at a minimum one producer member and one handler member, and any action of the committee shall require at least six concurring votes;
( b ) The committee may vote by telephone, telegraph, or other means of communications; and any votes so cast shall be confirmed promptly in writing: *Provided,* That if an assembled meeting is held, all votes shall be cast in person.
[45 FR 40566, June 16, 1980, as amended at 87 FR 36213, June 16, 2022]
Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 5 Filed 09/06/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 5 Filed 09/06/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 5 Filed 09/06/2006 Page 3 of 3
#### COSTE, Respondent, v. JABAUT, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

July 1, 1914.)

Action by Henry Coste, Jr., against Frank Jabaut.

No opinion. Order affirmed, without costs.
Subpart 951.1 - Contractor Use of

Government Supply Sources

Parent topic: PART 951 - USE OF GOVERNMENT SOURCES BY CONTRACTORS

951.101 Policy.

(a) It is Department of Energy (DOE) policy that contractors performing under cost-reimbursement

contracts should meet their requirements from Government sources of supply when these sources

are available to them, and if it is economically advantageous or otherwise in the best interest of the

Government.

951.102 Authorization to use Government supply sources.

(a) The Head of the Contracting Activity may authorize contractors performing under costreimbursement contracts and subcontractors performing under cost-reimbursement subcontracts,

where all higher tier contracts and subcontracts are cost-type, to use Government supply sources in

accordance with the requirements and procedures in 48 CFR part 51, DOE PMR 41 CFR 109, and

any necessary approval from the agency involved. This authority may be redelegated to the level of

contracting officer. Direct acquisition by the DOE, rather than by a contractor under costreimbursement contracts, shall be required where deemed necessary by the Head of the Contracting

Activity in order to carry out special requirements of appropriation acts or other applicable laws

relating to particular items.

(c)

(1) The DOE central point of contact for the assignment, correction, or deletion of FEDSTRIP activity

address codes is the Office of Resource Management, within the Headquarters procurement

organization.

(e)(4) Materials, supplies, and equipment acquired from Government sources of supply under the

procedures described herein must be used exclusively in connection with Government work, except

as otherwise authorized by the Head of the Contracting Activity.

951.103 Ordering from Government supply sources.

(b) The Senior Procurement Executive shall be informed of instances in which GSA sources of supply

are not used because of the quality of the items available from GSA or when a Federal Supply

Schedule contractor refuses to honor an order.
1997 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

7-28-1997

Township of Center v. First Mercury

Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket 96-3290

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1997

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1997 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Township of Center v. First Mercury" (1997). 1997 Decisions. Paper 173.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1997/173
iled July 28, 1997 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 

No. 96-3290 

TOWNSHIP OF CENTER, BUTLER COUNTY, 

PENNSYLVANIA; DEAN E. SCHWEINSBERG; and 

DEBRA J. OESTERLING, 

Appellants 

v. 

FIRST MERCURY SYNDICATE, INC. 

(D.C. Civil Action No. 95-cv-00837) 

SUR PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING

Before: BECKER and ROTH, Circuit Judges and 

ORLOFSKY,1 District Judge 

ORDER 

The petition for rehearing filed by appellee in the abovecaptioned case having been submitted to the judges who 

participated in the decision of this court, and, the judges 

having determined to amend the opinion, the petition for 

panel rehearing is granted for the purpose of that 

amendment. 

_________________________________________________________________ 

1. Honorable Stephen M. Orlofsky, United States District Judge for the 

District of New Jersey, sitting by designation. 
By the Court, 

/s/Jane R. Roth 

Circuit Judge 

Dated: July 28, 1997 

A True Copy: 

Teste: 

Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit
5639.105-90 Policy.    (d) The requiring activity will address the need for privacy protection in the specifications or Statement of Work (SOW). Contracting officers will notify the appropriate organization or office when it intends to issue a solicitation for items or services with an element of privacy protection. Contracting officers will identify the point of contact or agency responsible for oversight of privacy protection to the contractor after award.              HQ, United States Special Operations Command       Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L)       SOFARS 5639       February 2007 **Parent topic:** 5639.105 Privacy.
252.232-7014 Reserved

Parent topic: 252.232 RESERVED
#### § 948.91 Separability.

If any provision of this subpart is declared invalid or the applicability thereof to any person, circumstance or thing is held invalid, the validity of the remainder of this subpart, or the applicability thereof to any other person, circumstance or thing shall not be affected thereby.
Exhibit
32.1


Certification
of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009 (the “Report”) of United States Natural Gas Fund, LP (the “Registrant”), as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
Nicholas D. Gerber, the President and Chief Executive Officer of United States
Commodity Funds LLC, General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the
best of my knowledge, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.







Date:  March
      1, 2010
                  By:
                  /s/
      Nicholas
      D. GerberName:
                    Title:
                  Nicholas
      D. Gerber
                    President
      and Chief Executive Officer
                    United
      States Commodity Funds LLC,
                    General
      Partner of United States Natural Gas Fund,
LP
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NOBTHERN DIVISION

MARVIN KURT NATION

Plaintiff,

WILLIE AMBEHS, ET AL.

CASE No. cv-06-693

Relationship toPartv

N/A

Defendants,

CONFLICT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

COMES NOW wirrie Ambers , " Defendant in the above-captioned

matter, and in accordance with the order of this Court, making the following disclosure

concerning parent companies, subsidiaries, partners, limited liability entity members and

managers, trustees (but not trust benefrciaries), affiliates, or similar entities reportable under

the provisions of the Middle District of Alabama's General Order No. 3047:

This party is an individual, or

This party is a governmental entity, or

There are no entities to be reported, or

The following entities and their relationship tothe party are hereby reported:

n

n

E

n

Reportable Entity

None

12/21/2007 /s/ Neal P. Conner

(Signature)

Neal P. Conner

(Counsel's Name)

Willie Ambers

Counsel for (print names of all parties)

301 South Riolev Street

I\lo4loomerv Al i6130

Address, City, State Zip Code

334-353-3890

Telephone Number

Case 2:06-cv-00693-ID-TFM Document 38 Filed 12/21/2007 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

DIVISION

CERTIFIGATE OF SERVICE

l, Neal P conner 

__, do hereby Certify that a true and correct copy

of the foregoing has been furnished by u. s. mail, postage prepaid (manner of service,

i.e., U.S. Mail, electronic mall, etc.) on this 21 _day of December 20O7, to:

Marvin Kurt Nation, AIS#141669

Unit 717O

3800 Fountain

Atmore, AL 36503

1?y21t2007 /s/ Neal P. Conner

Date Signature

Case 2:06-cv-00693-ID-TFM Document 38 Filed 12/21/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 21 Filed 12/13/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 21 Filed 12/13/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 21 Filed 12/13/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 21 Filed 12/13/2006 Page 4 of 4
Gordon 

Fields/CA11/11/USCOURTS

01/31/2008 11:25 AM

To Yolanda Williams/ALMD/11/USCOURTS@USCOURTS

cc Donna Norfleet/ALMD/11/USCOURTS@USCOURTS, Jan S 

Camp/CA11/11/USCOURTS@USCOURTS

bcc

Subject 1st Request for ROA: 07-14446-BB (DC: 1:06-00708 CV C 

1)

CA11# 07-14446-BB

Great Southern Wood Preserving v. American Home

MAL: 1:06-00708 CV C 1

----------------------------------------GORDON FIELDS

Briefing/Closing Docket Clerk

11th Circuit Courts of Appeal

(404) 335-6226

Case 1:06-cv-00708-CSC Document 48 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 1 of 1
Subpart 2914.4 - Opening of Bids and Award of Contract    **Parent topic:** PART 2914 - SEALED BIDDING2914.404-1 Cancellation of invitations after opening.       The authority of the agency head in FAR 14.404-1(c) and (f) to make a *written* determination to cancel an invitation for bids and reject all bids after opening and to authorize completion of the acquisition through negotiation is delegated to the HCA.2914.407-3 Other mistakes disclosed before award.       (a) The authority to make determinations, as conferred by FAR 14.407-3(e) is delegated to the HCA, without power of redelegation, but only after consultation with the Office of the Solicitor. All such determinations shall be documented in the contract file.          (b) The following procedures must be followed when submitting doubtful cases of mistakes in bids to the Comptroller General for an advance decision, as provided by FAR 14.407-3(i).          (1) Requests must be made by the HCA after consultation with the Office of the Solicitor.          (2) Requests must be in writing, dated, signed by the requestor, addressed to the Comptroller General of the United States, General Accounting Office, Washington, DC 20548, and contain the following:          (i) The name and address of the party requesting the decision; and          (ii) A statement of the question to be decided, a presentation of all relevant facts, a statement of the requesting party's position with respect to the question, and copies of all pertinent records and supporting documentation.2914.408 Award.2914.408-1 General.       (a) When only one bid is received in response to an invitation for bids, such bid may be considered and accepted if the contracting officer makes a written determination that:          (1) The specifications used in the invitation were not unduly restrictive;          (2) Adequate competition was solicited and it could have been reasonably assumed that more than one bid would have been submitted;          (3) The price is reasonable; and          (4) The bid is otherwise in accordance with the invitation for bids.          (b) Such a determination must be placed in the contract file.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-14-00149-CV

IN RE RICHARD WALLRATH

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

We will grant mandamus relief if there has been an abuse of discretion and the 

relator has no adequate remedy at law, such as an appeal. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 

833, 839 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding); In re Price, 998 S.W.2d 897, 897 (Tex. App.—Waco

1999, orig. proceeding); see also In re Johnson, 238 S.W.3d 846, 847 (Tex. App.—El Paso 

2007, orig. proceeding). The relator has the burden of showing that he has no adequate 

remedy available at law. Johnson, 238 S.W.3d at 847 (citing In re Prudential Ins. Co. of 

Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding)).

 

1 The background of this proceeding is well known to the parties; thus, we do not recite it here in detail. 

Because the dispositive issue is settled in law, we issue this memorandum opinion. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(a), 

47.4.
In re Wallrath Page 2

Because we conclude that relator has an adequate remedy at law in the form of 

seeking a temporary injunction in the trial court,2 we deny his petition for writ of 

mandamus.3 Our stay of the trial court’s April 10, 2014 “Order on Defendants’ Motion 

to Dissolve Rule 11 Agreement” is vacated.4

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

(Chief Justice Gray concurs with a note)*

Petition denied 

Opinion delivered and filed August 21, 2014

[CV06]

*(Chief Justice Gray concurs in the denial of the petition for writ of mandamus 

but does not join the Court’s opinion.)

 

2 The record shows that, in conjunction with the subject Rule 11 agreement, both sides agreed and 

understood that relator would seek a hearing on his application for a temporary injunction.

3 We express no opinion on whether the trial court abused its discretion.

4 We grant relator’s and real parties’ respective motions for leave.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

ELIZABETH LYNNE HUTCHINSON, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

 )

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06cv700-WHA

 )

PHENIX CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION, )

and LARRY E. DICHIARA, )

 )

Defendants. )

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Stipulation for Dismissal (Doc. #70), filed by the parties

on June 19, 2008, and for good cause shown, it is hereby

ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice, the parties to bear their own

costs.

DONE this 19th day of June, 2008.

 /s/ W. Harold Albritton 

W. HAROLD ALBRITTON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 71 Filed 06/19/2008 Page 1 of 1
INDEX OF THIRD SET OF LETTERS OF SUPPORT

1. State of Hawaii Department of Busi ness, Economic Development & Tourism

2. Maui County Council

3. City Mill Company, Ltd.

4. Kualoa Ranch Hawaii, Inc.

5. Kyo-ya Hotels & Resorts, President Ernest K. Nishizaki Docket OST-2010-0018
#### § 966.28 Failure to nominate.

If nominations are not made within the time and in the manner specified in § 966.27, the Secretary may, without regard to nominations, select the committee members and alternates, which selection shall be on the basis of the representation provided for in §§ 966.24 through 966.26 inclusive.
(May 13, 1980)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph Denti, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered on October 18, 1979, unanimously affirmed. The case is remitted to the Supreme Court, Bronx County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). No opinion. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Birns, Markewich and Yesawich, JJ.
#### § 987.138 Handlers of record.

Prior to handling dates, each person shall file CDAC Form No. 18 with the Committee at the times, and containing the information, prescribed in § 987.38.

[43 FR 28437, June 30, 1978]
EPA Form 5900-06 

 OMB No. 2060-0336, Approval Expires 04/30/2012 

Federal Operating Permit Program (40 CFR Part 71) 

FEE FILING FORM (FF)

Complete this form each time you prepare form FEE and send this form to the appropriate lockbox bank 

address, along with full payment. This form required at time of initial fee payment, and thereafter, when 

paying annual fees. 

Source or Facility Name__________________________________________________________ 

Source Location _______________________________________________________________ 

EPA Region where Source Located _____________________ 

Mailing Address: 

Street/P.O. Box ______________________________ City_____________________________ 

State ______ ZIP __________ - ______ 

Contact Person:_____________________________ Title______________________________ 

 Telephone ( ____ ) _____ - __________ Ext. __________ 

 

Total Fee Payment Remitted: $ __________________._____ 
EPA Form 5900-06 

INSTRUCTIONS FOR FF (FEE FILING FORM) 

Source Location: The actual location of the source: Street address (if any), City (if any), County, and 

State. 

Mailing Address: This is the address we should use to send any correspondence concerning fee payment. 

 This address may be different than the source location, such as a corporate office. 

EPA Region: The EPA region in which the source is located (e.g., EPA Region 8) 

Contact: This should be the person that can best answer questions concerning fee payment. 

Payment of part 71 fees, interest and penalties may be made by check or electronic means as follows. 

CHECK PAYMENT: 

 Fee payment shall be in U.S. currency drawn on a U.S. bank and made out to the order of the 

US Environmental Protection Agency. 

 Please send this form (FF) with check payment to one of the addresses below: 

 Also send a photocopy of the check to the EPA regional office (or delegate agency) with form 

FEE. 

Address for Regular Mail through U.S. Postal Service (USPS): 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

FOIA and Miscellaneous Payments 

Cincinnati Finance Center 

PO Box 979078 

St. Louis, MO 63197-9000 

Address for Express Delivery (or When a Physical Address is Required): 

U.S. Bank 

Government Lockbox 979078 

US EPA FOIA & Misc. Payments 

1005 Convention Plaza 

Mail Station SL-MO-C2-GL 

St. Louis, MO 63101 

Contact: Natalie Pearson ( U.S. Bank) 

314-418-4087 

FOR ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS: See link below for more information on making electronic payments. 

FOR MORE INFORMATION: The following links provides detailed information on how to make payments 

to EPA for part 71 fees, penalties, and interest, including contact information for EPA’s Accounts 

Receivable Branch in Cincinnati (Note that more specific information concerning part 71 fees is found on 

the second link under “FOIA and Miscellaneous Payments.” 

http://www.epa.gov/ocfo/finservices/make_a_payment.htm 

http://www.epa.gov/ocfo/finservices/payment_instructions.htm