alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2957 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2957

 To reduce temporarily the duty on certain other footwear covering the 
            ankle with coated or laminated textile fabrics.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 23, 2006

  Mr. Carper introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To reduce temporarily the duty on certain other footwear covering the 
            ankle with coated or laminated textile fabrics.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN OTHER FOOTWEAR COVERING THE ANKLE WITH COATED OR 
              LAMINATED TEXTILE FABRICS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.64.13      Footwear, other     20%          No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         than men's or                                                      31/2009
                         women's, covering
                         the ankle, valued
                         over $20/pair,
                         designed to be
                         worn over, or in
                         lieu of, other
                         footwear as a
                         protection
                         against water,
                         oil, grease or
                         chemicals or cold
                         or inclement
                         weather where
                         such protection
                         includes
                         protection
                         against water
                         that is imparted
                         by the use of a
                         coated or
                         laminated textile
                         fabric (except
                         footwear with
                         waterproof
                         injection molded
                         bottoms, i.e.
                         comprising a
                         complete outer
                         sole and all or
                         part of the
                         upper) (provided
                         in subheading
                         6404.19.20)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20

- 3651

_____________________________ S OUTH W ALTON P ROPERTIES , LLC a nd A&J H OLDINGS , LLC
, Appellant s ,

v.

C ALYPSO T OWERS R ESORT C OMMUNITY A SSOCIATION , I NC ., T HE C ALYPSO G ROUP , LLC, T HE C ALYPSO D EVELOPERS I, LLC, T HE C ALYPSO D EVELOPERS II, LLC, T HE C ALYPSO D EVELOPERS III, LLC, and Y ATES , LLC
, Appellee s

.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circui t Court for Bay County

. John L. Fishel
, II, Judge

. September 6, 2022

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
W INOKUR , N ORDBY , and T ANENBAUM , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Stephen E. Syfrett of Syfrett & Garmon, P.A., Panama City; Martin B. Sipple and Alexandra Akre of Ausley McMullen, Tallahassee
, for Appellant s

. Matthew R. Cogburn of Cogburn Law Firm, P.A., Tampa; Craig B. Morris of Morris Law Firm, P.C., Point Clear
, A L
, for Appellee s

.
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 73 Filed 03/28/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 73 Filed 03/28/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 73 Filed 03/28/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 73 Filed 03/28/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 73 Filed 03/28/2007 Page 5 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 73-2 Filed 03/28/2007 Page 1 of 1
252.247-7000 Hardship Conditions.       As prescribed in                 247.270-4             (a), use the following clause:          HARDSHIP CONDITIONS (AUG 2000)          (a)  If the Contractor finds unusual ship, dock, or cargo conditions associated with loading or unloading a particular cargo, that will work a hardship on the Contractor if loaded or unloaded at the basic commodity rates, the Contractor shall—          (1)  Notify the Contracting Officer before performing the work, if feasible, but no later than the vessel sailing time; and          (2)  Submit any associated request for price adjustment to the Contracting Officer within 10 working days of the vessel sailing time.          (b)  Unusual conditions include, but are not limited to, inaccessibility of place of stowage to the ship's cargo gear, side port operations, and small quantities of cargo in any one hatch.          (c)  The Contracting Officer will investigate the conditions promptly after receiving the notice.  If the Contracting Officer finds that the conditions are unusual and do materially affect the cost of loading or unloading, the Contracting Officer will authorize payment at the applicable man-hour rates set forth in the schedule of rates of this contract.          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 252.247 RESERVED
1308.802-70 Printing.       Insert clause 1352.208-70, *Restrictions on Printing and Duplicating,* in all solicitations and contracts when printing documents may be required in the performance of the contract.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1308.8 - Acquisition of Printing and Related Supplies
#### § 981.65 Prohibition on the use or disposition of reserve almonds.

Except as provided in §§ 981.66 and 981.67, almonds that are withheld as reserve pursuant to the requirements of § 981.50 or are creditable in satisfaction of a reserve withholding obligation thereunder, shall not be used or disposed of by any handler or any other person.
#### In the Matter of Jerome Karp et al., Respondents, v. Otto Lasky et al., Appellants, et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding to invalidate petitions designating certain persons as candidates in the Democratic Party Primary Election for the 39th Assembly District, Kings County, to be held on June 23, 1970, for nomination for the public office of Member of the Assembly, and for the Party positions of Member of the State Committee, Male and Female, and of Delegates and Alternate Delegates to the Democratic Party Judicial Convention, 2nd Judicial District, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered June 9, 1970, which invalidated said petitions. Judgment affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Rabin, Acting P. J., Munder, Martuscello, Latham and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
# Subpart 445.3 - Providing Government Property to Contractors

**Parent topic:**PART 445 - GOVERNMENT PROPERTY

## 445.302 Providing facilities.

## 445.302-1 Policy.

Heads of contracting activities (HCA's) are authorized to make determinations for providing facilities to a contractor as prescribed in FAR 45.302-1(a)(4).
# Subpart 1328.1 - Bonds and Other Financial Protections

**Parent topic:**PART 1328 - BONDS AND INSURANCE

## 1328.101 Bid guarantees.

## 1328.101-1 Policy on use.

The designee authorized to make a class waiver for the requirement to obtain a bid guarantee when a performance bond or a performance and payment bond is required is set forth in CAM 1301.70.   

## 1328.102 Waiver of performance and payment bonds for contracts involving the construction, alteration, and repair of NOAA's fleet of vessels.

## 1328.102-1 Waiver policy.

(a) Pursuant to the authority vested in the Secretary of Commerce, the requirements of 40 U.S.C. 3131 through 3133 may be waived by virtue of the authority vested in him or her pursuant to the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015, Public Law 113-235, 128 Stat. 2130, Div. B, Title I, Sec. 111 (2014), with respect to contracts for the repair, alteration, and construction of NOAA's hydrographic survey, oceanographic research, and fisheries survey vessels operated by NOAA Office of Marine and Aviation Operations in the Atlantic and Pacific regions including the Pacific Islands. The Department's policy and procedures for use of the waiver authority is set forth in CAM 1328.102. 

(b) Contracting officers are required to consider any unusual circumstances that may arise in which either payment or performance bonds, or both, will be advantageous to the Government in connection with these contracts prior to issuing solicitations. 

## 1328.102-2 Waiver authority.

The designee authorized to approve bond waivers is set forth in CAM 1328.102. 

## 1328.102-3 Contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 1352.228-77, *Contractor Assurance of Subcontractor Payments,* in solicitations and contracts when performance and payment bonds are waived. 

## 1328.105 Other types of bonds.

The designee authorized to approve using other types of bonds in connection with acquiring particular supplies or services is set forth in CAM 1301.70.   

## 1328.106 Administration.

## 1328.106-2 Substitution of surety bonds.

The designee authorized to approve substituting a new surety bond for the previously approved original bond is set forth in CAM 1301.70.   

## 1328.106-6 Furnishing information.

When a payment bond has been provided for a contract, the designee authorized to furnish a certified copy of the bond and the contract to any person who makes a proper request is set forth in CAM 1301.70.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) 2:06-MJ-0071-DRB

)

RICHARD FERGUSON )

ORDER ON ORAL MOTION

At the defendant Richard Ferguson’s initial appearance July 21, 2006, on petition for

supervised release revocation, the defendant made an oral motion for a preliminary hearing,

it is, therefore, 

ORDERED that defendant’s motion is GRANTED. The preliminary hearing is

set at 10:30 a.m. on July 24, 2006, in District Courtroom 4A, Frank M. Johnson United

States Courthouse Complex, 1 Church Street, Montgomery, AL 36104.

Pending the hearing, the defendant shall be held in the custody of the U.S. Marshal

and produced for the hearing. 

Done this 21 day of July, 2006. st

/s/ Delores R. Boyd

DELORES R. BOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-mj-00071-DRB Document 3 Filed 07/21/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 3:06-cv-00691-WHA-WC Document 10 Filed 08/30/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### § 987.63 Reports on restricted dates withheld.

Each handler from time to time, on demand of the Committee, shall file with it a report of the restricted dates withheld by him in satisfaction of his withholding obligation. Such reports shall show such information as the Committee may require and may be in such form as the Committee may prescribe.
#### § 959.17 District.

*District* means each of the geographic divisions of the production area initially established pursuant to § 959.24 or as reestablished pursuant to § 959.25.
#### § 983.51 Quality regulations.

For any production year, the committee may establish, with the approval of the Secretary, such quality and inspection requirements applicable to pistachios shipped for human consumption in domestic or export markets as will contribute to orderly marketing or be in the public interest. In such production year, no handler shall ship pistachios for human consumption in domestic, or if applicable, export markets unless they meet the applicable requirements as evidenced by certification acceptable to the committee. The committee may, with the approval of the Secretary, establish different quality and inspection requirements for different markets.

[77 FR 36123, June 18, 2012]
|Plante Moran(logo) | Plante & Moran, PLLC10 South Riverside Plaza9th floorChicago, IL 60606Tel: 312.207.1040Fax: 312.207.1066plantemoran.com
|------------------ | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



To the Board of Directors

National Tax Search, LLC



We have examined National Tax Search, LLC’s
(the “Company”) compliance with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, set
forth in Item 1122(d) of the Security and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the National Tax Search TaxQ system (the
“Platform”) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016. The Company has determined that only certain servicing
criteria, 1122(d)(l)(ii), 1122(d)1(iv), 1122(d)2(ii), 1122(d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii), are applicable
to the activities performed by it with respect to the Platform covered by this report. The Company has determined that the remaining
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities performed by it with
respect to the Platform covered by this report.



Management is responsible for the Company’s
compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the
Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis,
evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included a selection of a sample of transactions and compliance activities
related to the Platform during the examination period and determining whether the Company processed those transactions and performed
those activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Our testing of selected transactions and compliance activities was
limited to calculations, reports, and activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures
did not include determining whether errors may have occurred prior to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts
calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions.
We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination
on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.



In our opinion, management’s assertion that
the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 for the Platform
is fairly stated in all material respects.



/s/ Plante & Moran, PLLC



Chicago, IL

January 27, 2017



Praxity Member
Global Alliance of
Independent Firms
(June 15, 1970)

#### In the Matter of John T. Nappi et al., Petitioners, v. Jerome A. Ambro, as Supervisor of the Town of Huntington, et al., Respondents.

This is a proceeding pursuant to section 36 of the Public Officers Law instituted by certain residents of the Town of Huntington to remove from office the Town’s Supervisor and certain of its other officers for alleged “ misconduct, maladministration and malfeasance ” upon the charges contained in the petition. The respondents have cross-moved to dismiss the proceeding. The cross motions are granted and the petition is dismissed, without costs. It appears from the papers submitted that an action by 110 Manno Realty Corp. (hereinafter called “Manno”) against the Town of Huntington to enjoin the latter from holding a public hearing to change the zoning of Manno’s real property from a commercial to a residential classification is still pending and undetermined in the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, and that, in that action, by a temporary restraining order, the town was enjoined from holding such a public hearing. It is alleged that, nevertheless, the respondents, “ with full knowledge ” thereof, “wilfully disobeyed” the court’s lawful mandate, held the hearing specifically *980enjoined thereby and proceeded to enact a resolution “purportedly” changing the zoning of Manno’s property to a residential classification. In our opinion, the petition fails to establish, prima facie, grounds sufficient to warrant the relief sought. The facts as alleged in the petition are not of such character as to justify a present judicial determination that the respondents have been guilty of “misconduct, maladministration and malfeasance” in office within the meaning of section 36 of the Public Officers Law. Christ, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Martuscello and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: ___2013_______-NM-_____242_____-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
§ 766.53 Disaster Set-Aside amount limitations. ( a ) The DSA amount is limited to the lesser of: ( 1 ) The first or second scheduled annual installment on the FLP loans due after the disaster occurred; or
( 2 ) The amount the borrower is unable to pay the Agency due to the disaster. Borrowers are required to pay any portion of an installment they are able to pay.
( b ) The amount set aside will be the unpaid balance remaining on the installment at the time the DSA is complete. This amount will include the unpaid interest and any principal that would be credited to the account as if the installment were paid on the due date, taking into consideration any payments applied to principal and interest since the due date.
( c ) Recoverable cost items may not be set aside.
156 So.2d 601

#### Lynn KILPATRICK v. STATE of Louisiana, through the DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS.

No. 46876.

Oct. 9, 1963.

In re: The Department of Highways of the State of Louisiana applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Bienville154 So.2d 439.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the.Court of Appeal its judgment is correct.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Centenary International
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Hector A. Patron Costas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Hector A. Patron Costas
--------------------------------
Hector A. Patron Costas
Chief Executive Officer
May 15, 2006

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
     other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
     signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
     written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
     the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
     staff upon request. The foregoing certifications are accompanying the
     Company's Form 10-QSB solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
     Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title
     18, United States Code) and are not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB
     or as a separate disclosure document.
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of Cavico Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ha Quang Bui, Chief Executive
Officer and Financial Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
that:





(1) This
report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Ha Quang BuiHa
      Quang Bui
                Chief
      Executive OfficerDate:  April
      15, 2010
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3204 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3204

  To suspend temporarily the duty on 1-Propene,1,1,2,3,3,3-hexafluoro-
                         oxidized, polymerized.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

Mr. Lautenberg introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on 1-Propene,1,1,2,3,3,3-hexafluoro-
                         oxidized, polymerized.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1-PROPENE,1,1,2,3,3,3-HEXAFLUORO-OXIDIZED, POLYMERIZED.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.38.25        1-Propene,1,1,2,3,3,3-  Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           hexafluoro-oxidized,                                              31/2009          ''
                           polymerized (CAS No.                                                                .
                           69991-67-9) (provided
                           for in subheading
                           3824.90.91 and
                           3907.20.00)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```