alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
rcar_ex1027.htm

EXHIBIT 10.27

 

 

 

This FIRST AMENDMENT dated January 29, 2018 (this “Amendment”) to the Loan Agreement dated September 9, 2016 (the “Loan Agreement”) by and between RENOVACARE, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Borrower”) and Kalen Capital Corporation (“Payee”). All Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meaning ascribed thereto in the Loan Agreement.

 

WHEREAS the parties deem it to be in their respective best interests to amend the Loan Agreement so as to extend the maturity date of the Loan.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto, in consideration of their mutual covenants hereinafter set forth and intending to be legally bound hereby, agree as follows:

 

1. The effective date of this Amendment shall be December 31, 2017.

 

1. Section 2.03 of the Loan Agreement is hereby amended by changing “December 31, 2017” to “December 31, 2019.”

 

2. Borrower will deliver an amendment to the Promissory Note dated September 9, 2016 reflecting the change in the maturity date of the Loan form “December 31, 2017” to “December 31, 2019.”

 

3. If there is any conflict between the terms, conditions and obligations of this Amendment and the Loan Agreement, this Amendment’s terms, conditions and obligations shall control. All other provisions of the Loan Agreement not specifically amended by this Amendment are preserved and remain in full force and effect.

 

4. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. The exchange of copies of this Amendment or amendments thereto and of signature pages by facsimile transmission or by email transmission in portable digital format, or similar format, shall constitute effective execution and delivery of such instrument(s) as to the parties and may be used in lieu of the original Amendment or amendment for all purposes. Signatures of the parties transmitted by facsimile or by email transmission in portable digital format, or similar format, shall be deemed to be their original signatures for all purposes.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed and delivered this Agreement as of the date first above written.

 


	RENOVACARE, INC.	
	 		
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	By:		
	
Name:
	Thomas Bold	
	Title: 	President and Chief Executive Officer	
	 		
	
KALEN CAPITAL CORPORATION
	
	
  
		
	
By:
		
	
Name: 
	
Harmel S. Rayat
	
	
Title:
	
President
714.408-170 Partner vetting.

If an acquisition is identified as subject to vetting, see (48 CFR) AIDAR 704.70 for the applicable

procedures and requirements.

Parent topic: Subpart 714.4—Opening of Bids and Award of Contract
Exhibit 31.4





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A)/15D-14(A)



I, John Rego, certify that:



1. I have reviewed Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No.
1) of Telaria, Inc.; and



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|March 25, 2020 | /s/ John Rego                
|-------------- | -----------------------------
|               | John Rego                    
|               |                              
|               | Chief Financial Officer      
|               |                              
|               | (Principal Financial Officer)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7514

WILLARD LEE MARTIN, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus THEODIS BECK, Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Wallace Wade Dixon, Magistrate Judge. (CA-02-189-1) Submitted: December 19, 2002 Decided: January 6, 2003 Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. J. Phillip Griffin, NORTH CAROLINA PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES, INC., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000). 2 PER CURIAM: Willard Lee Martin seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). * We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge that Martin has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Martin v. Beck , No. CA-02-189-1 (M.D.N.C., filed Aug. 30, 2002; entered Sept. 3, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

§ 810.805 Special grades and special grade requirements. ( a ) *Blighted mixed grain.* Mixed grain in which barley predominates and that contains more than 4.0 percent of fungus-damaged and/or mold-damaged barley kernels.
( b ) *Ergoty mixed grain.* ( 1 ) Mixed grain in which rye or wheat predominates and that contains more than 0.30 percent ergot, or
( 2 ) Any other mixed grain that contains more than 0.10 percent ergot.
( c ) *Garlicky mixed grain.* ( 1 ) Mixed grain in which wheat, rye, or triticale predominates, and that contains 2 or more green garlic bulblets, or an equivalent quantity of dry or partly dry bulblets in 1,000 grams of mixed grain; or
( 2 ) Any other mixed grain that contains 4 or more green garlic bulblets, or an equivalent quantity of dry or partly dry bulblets, in 500 grams of mixed grain.
( d ) *Smutty mixed grain.* ( 1 ) Mixed grain in which rye, triticale, or wheat predominates, and that contains 15 or more average size smut balls, or an equivalent quantity of smut spores in 250 grams of mixed grain, or
( 2 ) Any other mixed grain that has the kernels covered with smut spores to give a smutty appearance in mass, or that contains more than 0.2 percent smut balls.
( e ) *Treated mixed grain.* Mixed grain that has been scoured, limed, washed, sulfured, or treated in such a manner that its true quality is not reflected by the grade designation U.S. Mixed Grain or U.S. Sample grade Mixed Grain.
[52 FR 24418, June 30, 1987, as amended at 52 FR 24441, June 30, 1987]
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
131537 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 131537 COA: 269318 Jackson CC: 04-001208-FH JOHN MICHAEL HARDEN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 8, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

s0918 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 26, 2006

Clerk
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3170 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-Methylbenzonitrile. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. BOND introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-Methylbenzonitrile. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 4-METHYLBENZONITRILE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.29.24 4-Methylbenzonitrile (CAS No. 104–85– 

8) (provided for in subheading 

2926.90.43) ............................................. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 3170 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
# Subpart 445.6 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**PART 445 - GOVERNMENT PROPERTY
Editorial Note on Subpart A of Part 989
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 989 appear at 83 FR 53973, Oct. 26, 2018.

§ 989.54 Marketing policy. ( a ) *Marketing policy.* Each crop year, the Committee shall prepare and submit to the Secretary a report setting forth its recommended marketing policy, including quality regulations for the pending crop. In developing the marketing policy, the Committee may give consideration to the production, harvesting, processing, and storage conditions of that crop, as well as the following factors: ( 1 ) The estimated tonnage held by producers and handlers at the beginning of the crop year;
( 2 ) The expected general quality and any modifications of the minimum grade standards;
( 3 ) The estimated tonnage of standard and off-grade raisins which will be produced;
( 4 ) An estimated desirable carryout at the end of the crop year;
( 5 ) The estimated market demand for raisins, considering the estimated world raisin supply and demand situation;
( 6 ) Current prices being received and the probable general level of prices to be received for raisins by producers and handlers;
( 7 ) The trend and level of consumer income;
( 8 ) Any prohibition of trade practices, pursuant to § 989.62 intended for the crop year; and
( 9 ) Any other pertinent factors bearing on the marketing of raisins including the estimated supply of and demand for other varietal types and regulations applicable thereto.
( b ) *Modification.* In the event the Committee subsequently deems it advisable to modify its marketing policy on any crop, because of national emergency, crop failure, or other major change in economic conditions, it shall hold a meeting for that purpose, and file a report thereof with the Secretary within 5 days (exclusive of Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays) after the holding of such meeting, which report shall show such modification and the basis therefor.
( c ) *Publicity.* The Committee shall promptly give reasonable publicity to producers, dehydrators, handlers, and the cooperative bargaining association(s) of each meeting to consider a marketing policy or any modification thereof, and each such meeting shall be open to them. Similar publicity shall be given to producers, dehydrators, handlers, and the cooperative bargaining association(s) of each marketing policy report or modification thereof, filed with the Secretary and of the Secretary's action thereon. Copies of all marketing policy reports shall be maintained in the office of the Committee, where they shall be made available for examination by any producer, dehydrator, handler, or cooperative bargaining association representative. The Committee shall notify handlers, dehydrators and the cooperative bargaining association(s), and give reasonable publicity to producers of its computation.
[48 FR 32976, July 20, 1983, as amended at 50 FR 1831, Jan. 14, 1985; 54 FR 24670, June 9, 1989; 83 FR 53969, Oct. 26, 2018]
#### § 945.29 Alternate members.

An alternate member of the committee shall act in the place and stead of the member for whom he is an alternate during such member's absence and may perform such other duties as may be assigned or requested by the committee. In the event of the death, removal, resignation, or disqualification of a member his alternate shall act for him until a successor to such member is selected and has qualified. The committee may request the attendance of one or more alternates at any or all meetings, notwithstanding the expected or actual presence of the respective members.
Subpart 2907.1 - Acquisition Plans

Parent topic: PART 2907 - ACQUISITION PLANNING

2907.105 Contents of written acquisition plans.

The Department of Labor has implemented its acquisition planning system in compliance with FAR

7.1 and internal procedures provided in DLMS 2 section 834. The annual forecast is available for

review from: http://www.apps.dol.gov/contract_grant/index.htm.

2907.107 Additional requirements for acquisitions involving

bundling.

The FAR requirements for justification, review, and approval of bundling of contract requirements

also apply to an order from a Federal Supply Schedule contract, Governmentwide acquisition

contracts, or other indefinite-delivery contracts if the requirements consolidated under the order

meet the definition of “bundling” at FAR 2.101.
Case 2:06-mj-00075-DRB Document 12 Filed 08/03/2006 Page 1 of 1
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 20, 2021

No. 04-21-00325-CV

ISI CONTRACTING, INC. and Guerra Construction,

Appellants

v.

Naomi MARKHAM, Carrie Markham, and Trevor Markham, Individually and as the 

Administrator of the Estate of Joslyn Markham, Deceased,

Appellees

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CI01166

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellants’ reply briefs are due on December 21, 2021. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(c). 

Before the due date, Appellants filed an unopposed motion for an extension of time to file their 

reply briefs. 

Appellants’ motion is GRANTED. Appellants’ reply briefs are due on January 12, 2022. 

See id. R. 38.6(d). 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 20th day of December, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
§ 900.12 Administrator's recommended decision. ( a ) *Preparation.* As soon as practicable following the termination of the period allowed for the filing of written arguments or briefs and proposed findings and conclusions the Administrator shall file with the hearing clerk a recommended decision.
( b ) *Contents.* The Administrator's recommended decision shall include: ( 1 ) A preliminary statement containing a description of the history of the proceedings, a brief explanation of the material issues of fact, law, or discretion presented on the record, and proposed findings and conclusions with respect to such issues as well as the reasons or basis therefor;
( 2 ) a ruling upon each proposed finding or conclusion submitted by interested persons, and
( 3 ) an appropriate proposed marketing agreement or marketing order effectuating his recommendations.
( c ) *Exceptions to recommended decision.* Immediately following the filing of his recommended decision, the Administrator shall give notice thereof, and opportunity to file exceptions thereto by publication in the Federal Register. Within a period of time specified in such notice any interested person may file with the hearing clerk exceptions to the Administrator's proposed marketing agreement or marketing order, or both, as the case may be, and a brief in support of such exceptions. Such exceptions shall be in writing, shall refer, where practicable, to the related pages of the transcript and may suggest appropriate changes in the proposed marketing agreement or marketing order.
( d ) *Omission of recommended decision.* The procedure provided in this section may be omitted only if the Secretary finds on the basis of the record that due and timely execution of his functions imperatively and unavoidably requires such omission.
§ 97.143 Certified seed only. ( a ) Upon filing an application, or amendment thereto, specifying seed of the variety is to be sold by variety name only as a class of certified seed, the owner, or his or her designee, may label containers of seed of the variety substantially as follows: “Unauthorized Propagation Prohibited—U.S. Variety Protection Applied for Specifying That Seed of This Variety Is To Be Sold By Variety Name Only as a Class of Certified Seed.”
( b ) An owner who has received a certificate specifying that a variety is to be sold by variety name only, as a class of certified seed, may label containers of the seed of the variety substantially as follows: “Unauthorized Propagation Prohibited—To Be Sold By Variety Name Only as a Class of Certified Seed—U.S. Protected Variety.”
408.1103 Contract requirements.       If the requirement includes the need for the vendor to provide operational maintenance such as fueling, lubrication, or other fluid changes or replenishment, the contracting officer shall include in the contract:                    (1)  			A requirement for the use of fluids and lubricants containing the maximum available amounts of recovered materials, and alternative fuels whenever available; and          (2) A preference for retreaded tires meeting the Federal retread specifications, tires with the maximum recovered material content, or retreading services for the tires on the vehicle.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 408.11 - Leasing of Motor Vehicles
#### § 920.10 Handler.

*Handler* is synonymous with shipper and means any person (except a common or contract carrier transporting kiwifruit owned by another person) who handles kiwifruit.
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 11-40922 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. HERMAN OTONIEL LOPE Z J UAR E Z, also known as Genaro Antonio Cruz Garcia, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:11-CR-464-1
Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appoin t e d t o represent Herman Otoniel Lopez Juarez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lopez Juarez has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Lopez Juarez’s response. We concur with counsel’s a s s e ssment that the appeal U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D June 19 , 20 12 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 11-40922 Document: 00511891512 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/19/2012No. 11-40922

presents no nonfrivol o u s i ssue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 11-40922 Document: 00511891512 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/19/2012
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)    | the Amendment No. 2 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the “Report”) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |

|   |                                                                                                                                                              |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)    | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Patriot Coal Corporation. |

|   | /s/ Irl F. Engelhardt                    |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Irl F. EngelhardtChief Executive Officer |   |

----
1339.270 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.       (a) Insert provision substantially similar to 1352.239-71, *Electronic and Information Technology,* in solicitations for Electronic and Information (EIT) to which it applies.          (b) Insert clause 1352.239-72, *Security Requirements for Information Technology Resources,* in all DOC solicitations and contracts for Information Technology services. The clause language may only be modified by adding more restrictive agency- or operating unit counsel -specific guidance    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1339.2 - Electronic and Information Technology
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-21-00021-CV

GORDON DEAN HALEY, ANTON SCOTT HALEY, GORDON DEAN HALEY

AS INDEPENDENT CO-EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF MARGARET L. HALEY 

AND ANTON SCOTT HALEY AS INDEPENDENT CO-EXECUTOR OF

THE ESTATE OF MARGARET L. HALEY

v.

BENEFICIAL FINANCIAL I INC., SUCCESSOR BY

MERGER TO BENEFICIAL TEXAS, INC.

On Appeal from the

94th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2015-DCV-1306-C

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellants.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 26, 2021
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3431 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3431

To require the liquidation or reliquidation of certain entries of large 
           newspaper printing presses and components thereof.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 6, 2006

  Mr. Durbin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the liquidation or reliquidation of certain entries of large 
           newspaper printing presses and components thereof.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIQUIDATION OR RELIQUIDATION OF ENTRIES RELATING TO 
              NEWSPAPER PRINTING PRESSES.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Bureau of Customs 
and Border Protection shall, not later than 90 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, liquidate or reliquidate the entries described 
in, and in accordance with the antidumping duty rate of 59.67 percent 
provided in, the Final Results of the Changed Circumstances Review in 
Department of Commerce case A-588-837 (45 Fed. Reg. 11590; March 8, 
2006) for the period September 1, 1997 through August 31, 1998, plus 
any applicable interest due.
                                 <all>
```