FORM 10-QSB--QUARTERLY OR TRANSITIONAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
                       THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                        Quarterly or Transitional Report



                      U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   Form 10-QSB

(Mark One)

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
    ACT OF 1934

                 For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2001


[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
    ACT OF 1934


                For the transition period from _________to _________

                         Commission file number 0-14570


                             MCCOMBS REALTY PARTNERS
         (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)



         California                                         33-0068732
(State or other jurisdiction of                          (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                         Identification No.)

                          55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089
                        Greenville, South Carolina 29602
                      (Address of principal executive offices)

                                 (864) 239-1000
                           (Issuer's telephone number)


Check  whether the issuer (1) filed all reports  required to be filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the  Exchange  Act  during the  preceding  12 months (or for such
shorter period that the  registrant was required to file such reports),  and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No___



                         PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION


ITEM 1.     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

a)

                             MCCOMBS REALTY PARTNERS

                           CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
                                   (Unaudited)
                          (in thousands, except unit data)

                               September 30, 2001


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Assets
<S>                                                           <C>            <C>
   Cash and cash equivalents                                                 $  832
   Receivables and deposits                                                      20
   Restricted escrows                                                            45
   Other assets                                                                 103
   Investment property:
       Land                                                   $  499
       Buildings and related personal property                 5,904
                                                               6,403
       Less accumulated depreciation                          (4,200)         2,203
                                                                            $ 3,203
Liabilities and Partners' Deficit
Liabilities
   Accounts payable                                                         $    31
   Tenant security deposit liabilities                                           11
   Accrued property taxes                                                        75
   Other liabilities                                                             88
   Mortgage note payable                                                      5,483

Partners' Deficit
   General partner                                            $   --
   Limited partners (17,196.39 units
      issued and outstanding)                                 (2,485)        (2,485)
                                                                            $ 3,203


            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>

<PAGE>



b)

                             MCCOMBS REALTY PARTNERS

                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                                   (Unaudited)
                          (in thousands, except unit data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                        Three Months Ended        Nine Months Ended
                                           September 30,            September 30,
                                         2001         2000         2001        2000
Revenues:
<S>                                     <C>           <C>        <C>          <C>
  Rental income                         $  363        $ 374      $ 1,120      $ 1,110
  Other income                              31           32           87           84
       Total revenues                      394          406        1,207        1,194

Expenses:
  Operating                                173          156          478          494
  General and administrative                32           55          102          184
  Depreciation                              65           65          201          210
  Interest                                 117          118          350          352
  Property taxes                            26           21           75           64
       Total expenses                      413          415        1,206        1,304

Net (loss) income                      $   (19)       $  (9)     $     1      $  (110)

Net (loss) income allocated to
  general partner (1%)                 $    --        $  --      $    --      $    (1)
Net (loss) income allocated to
  limited partners (99%)                   (19)          (9)           1         (109)
                                       $   (19)       $  (9)     $     1      $  (110)
Net (loss) income per limited
  partnership unit                     $ (1.10)       $(.52)     $   .06      $ (6.34)


            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>

<PAGE>


c)

                             MCCOMBS REALTY PARTNERS

               CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' DEFICIT
                                   (Unaudited)
                          (in thousands, except unit data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                     Limited
                                   Partnership   General      Limited
                                      Units      Partner     Partners       Total

Partners' deficit at
<S>                                 <C>            <C>        <C>          <C>
   December 31, 2000                17,196.39      $ --       $(2,486)     $(2,486)

Net income for the nine months
   ended September 30, 2001                --         --            1            1

Partners' deficit at
   September 30, 2001               17,196.39      $ --       $(2,485)     $(2,485)



            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>


<PAGE>



d)

                             MCCOMBS REALTY PARTNERS

                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                                   (Unaudited)
                                   (in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                  Nine Months Ended
                                                                    September 30,
                                                                   2001        2000
Cash flows from operating activities:
<S>                                                                <C>        <C>
  Net income (loss)                                                $   1      $ (110)
  Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
     provided by operating activities:
     Depreciation                                                    201         210
     Amortization of loan costs                                       14          13
     Change in accounts:
       Receivables and deposits                                       11          86
       Other assets                                                  (12)        (10)
       Accounts payable                                               16         (16)
       Tenant security deposit liabilities                            (6)         (1)
       Accrued property taxes                                         (8)        (18)
       Other liabilities                                             (18)         13
         Net cash provided by operating activities                   199         167

Cash flows from investing activities:
  Property improvements and replacements                             (94)       (174)
  Net withdrawals from restricted escrows                             --         134
         Net cash used in investing activities                       (94)        (40)

Cash flows used in financing activities:
  Payments on mortgage note payable                                  (55)        (51)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents                             50          76

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period                     782         593

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                        $ 832        $ 669

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
  Cash paid for interest                                          $ 335        $ 339



At  December  31,  1999,  approximately  $88,000 of  property  improvements  and
replacements were included in accounts payable.


            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>

<PAGE>


e)

                             MCCOMBS REALTY PARTNERS

                     NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                                   (Unaudited)


Note A - Going Concern

Under the Plan of Reorganization (the "Plan"; see "Note C" below) McCombs Realty
Partners (the "Partnership" or "Registrant"),  a California limited partnership,
was required to pay claims to limited  partners and  creditors of  approximately
$11,000,000 on October 20, 1998. These claims have not been paid as of September
30,  2001.  This raises  substantial  doubt about the  Partnership's  ability to
continue as a going concern. In order to attempt to satisfy the remaining claims
under  the  Plan,  the  Partnership  would be  required  to sell the  investment
property.  As an alternative to the sale of the property,  the Partnership could
attempt  to obtain  authorization  from the Court and the  limited  partners  to
extend the settlement date of October 20, 1998, to a future period.  The limited
partners were  approached  in August 1998 and asked to either  approve a sale of
the  Partnership's  sole investment  property or for CRPTEX,  Inc. ("the General
Partner") to petition the  Bankruptcy  Court for an extension of the  settlement
date. The required fifty-one percent response was not received. As a result, the
Partnership defaulted on its obligations which were due on October 20, 1998. The
General Partner is continuing to see that the Partnership  operates its business
in the ordinary  course while it evaluates  the best course of action to follow.
The consolidated  financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Note B - Basis of Presentation

The accompanying  unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Partnership
have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted  accounting  principles
for interim  financial  information and with the instructions to Form 10-QSB and
Item  310(b) of  Regulation  S-B.  Accordingly,  they do not  include all of the
information and footnotes required by generally accepted  accounting  principles
for complete financial  statements.  In the opinion of the General Partner,  all
adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a
fair presentation  have been included.  Operating results for the three and nine
month periods ended  September  30, 2001 are not  necessarily  indicative of the
results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending  December 31, 2001.  For
further  information,   refer  to  the  consolidated  financial  statements  and
footnotes thereto included in the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 for the Partnership. The General Partner
is an affiliate of Apartment  Investment and  Management  Company  ("AIMCO"),  a
publicly traded real estate investment trust.

Principles of Consolidation:

The  Partnership's  consolidated  financial  statements  include the accounts of
Pelham Place, L.P., a South Carolina limited partnership.  Pelham Place, L.P. is
the limited  partnership which holds title to Lakewood at Pelham.  Pelham Place,
L.P. is wholly-owned by the Partnership. All interpartnership  transactions have
been eliminated.


<PAGE>

Segment Reporting:

Statement of Financial  Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 131, "Disclosure about
Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information" established standards for the
way that public business enterprises report information about operating segments
in annual  financial  statements  and  requires  that those  enterprises  report
selected  information about operating segments in interim financial reports.  It
also established  standards for related disclosures about products and services,
geographic  areas,  and  major  customers.  As  defined  in SFAS  No.  131,  the
Partnership has only one reportable  segment.  The General Partner believes that
segment-based disclosures will not result in a more meaningful presentation than
the consolidated financial statements as currently presented.

Note C - Plan of Reorganization

On March 9, 1987, the original general partners of the Partnership, on behalf of
the  Partnership,  filed a voluntary  petition  under  Chapter 11 of the Federal
Bankruptcy  Code  in U.S.  Bankruptcy  Court,  Central  District  of  California
("Court").  The  Partnership  continued as  Debtor-In-Possession  to operate its
business in the ordinary course until the Court confirmed the Partnership's Plan
effective  October 25, 1988.  The Plan was  approved by all required  classes of
creditors.

The Plan required that the  Partnership  make the following  payments on October
20, 1998:

      1)    First, all existing creditors, except prebankruptcy Class 12
            creditors ($23,100), would be satisfied;

      2)    Limited Partners, both original and substitute,  who made additional
            capital  contributions  under the Plan would  receive a repayment of
            the additional contributions totaling approximately $730,000;

      3)    Class 12 creditors would be paid claims aggregating $23,100;

      4)    Limited Partners who made additional capital  contributions and were
            original  Limited  Partners  would  receive  a  repayment  of  their
            original capital contributions totaling approximately $9,818,000;

      5)    Limited Partners who did not make additional  capital  contributions
            would receive a repayment of  one-third  of their  original  capital
            contributions (i.e., one-third of $1,200,000).

Additionally,  the Plan required CRPTEX, Inc. to make a capital  contribution of
$14,500 and loan or expend an additional  $117,500 on behalf of the  Partnership
on an as-needed basis. The Partnership received the $14,500 capital contribution
but has not required the additional $117,500.

The  payments  required  by  numbers 1 and 3 above  were  timely  satisfied.  In
addition,  all  other  claims  provided  for in the Plan then  outstanding  were
settled on June 25, 1995 when the  Partnership  refinanced the then  outstanding
mortgages  encumbering  the property.  However,  the  Partnership  was unable to
satisfy the amounts due to the limited partners  indicated in numbers 2, 4 and 5
above and is in default on these obligations.


<PAGE>




Note D - Transactions with Affiliated Parties

The Partnership has no employees and is dependent on the General Partner and its
affiliates for the management and administration of all Partnership  activities.
The  Partnership  Agreement  provides  for certain  payments to  affiliates  for
services and for  reimbursement  of certain  expenses  incurred by affiliates on
behalf of the Partnership.  The following  transactions with the General Partner
and its affiliates  were incurred during each of the nine months ended September
30, 2001 and 2000:

                                                                   2001    2000
                                                                  (in thousands)

 Property management fees (included in operating expenses)         $ 60    $ 59

 Reimbursement for services of affiliates (included in
    general and administrative expenses and investment property)     55      58

During the nine months  ended  September  30, 2001 and 2000,  affiliates  of the
General  Partner  were  entitled  to  receive  5% of  gross  receipts  from  the
Partnership's   investment  property  as  compensation  for  providing  property
management  services.  The  Partnership  paid to such  affiliates  approximately
$60,000  and  $59,000 for the nine  months  ended  September  30, 2001 and 2000,
respectively.

Affiliates  of  the  General  Partner  received   reimbursement  of  accountable
administrative  expenses amounting to approximately  $55,000 and $58,000 for the
nine months ended September 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively.

In addition to its  indirect  ownership of the general  partner  interest in the
Partnership,  AIMCO and its affiliates currently own 3,229.5 limited partnership
units in the Partnership  representing 18.78% of the outstanding units. A number
of these  units were  acquired  pursuant  to tender  offers made by AIMCO or its
affiliates.  It is possible that AIMCO or its affiliates will acquire additional
limited  partnership  interests in the  Partnership  for cash or in exchange for
units in the operating  partnership of AIMCO.  Under the Partnership  Agreement,
unitholders  holding a majority  of the Units are  entitled  to take action with
respect  to a  variety  of  matters,  which  would  include  voting  on  certain
amendments  to the  Partnership  Agreement  and  voting  to remove  the  General
Partner. When voting on matters, AIMCO would in all likelihood vote the Units it
acquired in a manner favorable to the interest of the General Partner because of
its affiliation with the General Partner.


<PAGE>



ITEM 2.     MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

The  matters  discussed  in this Form  10-QSB  contain  certain  forward-looking
statements  and  involve  risks and  uncertainties  (including  changing  market
conditions,   competitive  and  regulatory   matters,   etc.)  detailed  in  the
disclosures  contained  in this  Form  10-QSB  and the  other  filings  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission made by the  Partnership  from time to time.
The  discussions  of the  Partnership's  business  and  results  of  operations,
including  forward-looking  statements pertaining to such matters, does not take
into  account  the  effects of any  changes to the  Partnership's  business  and
results of operation.  Accordingly,  actual results could differ materially from
those  projected in the  forward-looking  statements  as a result of a number of
factors, including those identified herein.

The Partnership's  investment  property consists of one apartment  complex.  The
following  table sets forth the average  occupancy  of the property for the nine
months ended September 30, 2001 and 2000:

                                                   Average Occupancy
      Property                                      2001       2000

      Lakewood at Pelham                            95%        97%
        Greenville, South Carolina

Results of Operations

The Registrant's net (loss) income for the three and nine months ended September
30, 2001 was approximately ($19,000) and $1,000,  respectively,  compared to net
losses of approximately $9,000 and 110,000,  respectively for the three and nine
months ended  September 30, 2000.  The increase in net loss for the three months
ended  September  30,  2001 is due to a decrease  in total  revenues,  which was
partially offset by a decrease in total expenses. The decrease in total revenues
is primarily due to a decrease in rental  income.  The decrease in rental income
is primarily  due to a decrease in occupancy and  increased  concessions,  which
more than offset an increase  in the  average  rental rate at the  Partnership's
investment  property.  Other income remained  relatively  constant for the three
months ended  September 30, 2001.  The decrease in total  expenses for the three
months  ended   September  30,  2001  is  due  to  a  decrease  in  general  and
administrative  expenses, which was partially offset by an increase in operating
expenses.  The increase in operating expenses is primarily due to an increase in
insurance expense at the Partnership's investment property due to an increase in
premiums.

The  increase  in net income for the nine  months  ended  September  30, 2001 is
primarily  due to a  decrease  in total  expenses,  and to a lesser  extent,  an
increase in total  revenues.  The decrease in total expenses is primarily due to
decreases  in  operating  expenses  and  general  and  administrative   expenses
partially  offset by an increase in property  tax  expense.  Operating  expenses
decreased  primarily due to decreases in maintenance expense and payroll related
expenses,  partially  offset by an  increase  in the  insurance  premium  at the
Partnership's  investment property.  Property tax expense increased for the nine
months  ended  September  30,  2001  due to an  increase  in the tax rate at the
Partnership's  investment  property.  Depreciation  expense and interest expense
remained relatively constant for the comparable periods.

General and administrative expenses decreased for both the three and nine months
ended  September  30,  2001  primarily  due to a decrease in  professional  fees
associated  with the  management  of the  Partnership.  Included  in general and
administrative  expense  at both  September  30,  2001 and  2000 are  management
reimbursements  to the General Partner allowed under the Partnership  Agreement.
Also included are costs associated with the quarterly and annual  communications
with  investors  and  regulatory  agencies and the annual audit  required by the
Partnership Agreement.


<PAGE>



The increase in total  revenues for the nine months ended  September 30, 2001 is
due primarily to an increase in rental income. Rental income increased primarily
due to an  increase  in the  average  rental  rate,  which more than  offset the
decrease  in  occupancy  and an  increase in  concessions  at the  Partnership's
investment  property.  Other income  remained  relatively  constant for the nine
months ended September 30, 2001.

As part of the ongoing  business plan of the  Partnership,  the General  Partner
monitors the rental market environment of its investment  property to assess the
feasibility of increasing rents,  maintaining or increasing occupancy levels and
protecting the Partnership from increases in expenses. As part of this plan, the
General  Partner  attempts  to  protect  the  Partnership  from  the  burden  of
inflation-related  increases in expenses by increasing  rents and  maintaining a
high overall occupancy level. However, due to changing market conditions,  which
can  result in the use of rental  concessions  and rental  reductions  to offset
softening market conditions, there is no guarantee that the General Partner will
be able to sustain such a plan.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At  September  30,  2001,  the  Partnership  had cash and  cash  equivalents  of
approximately $832,000 compared to approximately $669,000 at September 30, 2000.
The increase in cash and cash equivalents of approximately  $50,000 for the nine
months ended  September 30, 2001, from the  Partnership's  calendar year end, is
due to approximately  $199,000 of cash provided by operating  activities,  which
was  partially  offset  by  approximately  $94,000  of cash  used  in  investing
activities and approximately $55,000 of cash used in financing activities.  Cash
used  in   investing   activities   consisted  of  property   improvements   and
replacements.  Cash  used in  financing  activities  consisted  of  payments  of
principal  made  on  the  mortgage  encumbering  the  Partnership's   investment
property.  The  Partnership  invests  its working  capital  reserves in interest
bearing accounts.

The sufficiency of existing  liquid assets to meet future  liquidity and capital
expenditure   requirements   is  directly   related  to  the  level  of  capital
expenditures required at the property to adequately maintain the physical assets
and other operating needs of the Partnership including satisfaction of remaining
claims related to the Partnership's Plan of Reorganization,  as described below,
and to comply with Federal,  state,  local,  legal and regulatory  requirements.
Capital  improvements  planned  at the  Partnership's  investment  property  are
detailed below.

For 2001,  the  Partnership  has  budgeted  approximately  $88,000  for  capital
improvements  at  Lakewood at Pelham,  consisting  primarily  of floor  covering
replacement  and interior and exterior  building  improvements.  The Partnership
completed   approximately   $94,000  of  budgeted   and   non-budgeted   capital
expenditures  at  Lakewood  at  Pelham  as of  September  30,  2001,  consisting
primarily of structural improvements,  interior building improvements, and floor
covering replacement. These improvements were funded by operations.

The additional  capital  expenditures will be incurred only if cash is available
from operations or from Partnership  reserves.  Current Partnership reserves are
sufficient to cover the estimated costs of the capital  improvements planned for
the year 2001.  However,  the  Partnership  does not have  sufficient  assets to
fulfill its  obligation  under the Plan of  Reorganization  ("Plan") and in fact
defaulted on its  obligations  due October 20, 1998.  See  discussion  below for
detail as to the Partnership's Plan with respect to meeting its short term needs
under the Plan. No distributions were declared or paid during either of the nine
month periods ended September 30, 2001 or 2000.

On March 9, 1987, the original general partners of the Partnership, on behalf of
the  Partnership,  filed a voluntary  petition  under  Chapter 11 of the Federal
Bankruptcy  Code  in U.S.  Bankruptcy  Court,  Central  District  of  California
("Court").  The  Partnership  continued as  Debtor-In-Possession  to operate its
business in the ordinary course until the Court confirmed the Partnership's Plan
effective  October 25, 1988.  The Plan was  approved by all required  classes of
creditors.


<PAGE>



The Plan required that the  Partnership  make the following  payments on October
20, 1998:

      1)    First, all existing creditors, except prebankruptcy Class 12
            creditors ($23,100), would be satisfied;

      2)    Limited Partners, both original and substitute,  who made additional
            capital  contributions  under the Plan would  receive a repayment of
            the additional contributions totaling approximately $730,000;

      3)    Class 12 creditors would be paid claims aggregating $23,100;

      4)    Limited Partners who made additional capital  contributions and were
            original  Limited  Partners  would  receive  a  repayment  of  their
            original capital contributions totaling approximately $9,818,000;

      5)    Limited Partners who did not make additional capital  contributions
            would receive a repayment of one-third  of their  original  capital
            contributions (i.e., one-third of $1,200,000).

Additionally,  the Plan required CRPTEX, Inc. to make a capital  contribution of
$14,500 and loan or expend an additional  $117,500 on behalf of the  Partnership
on an as-needed basis. The Partnership received the $14,500 capital contribution
but has not required the additional $117,500.

The  payments  required  by  numbers 1 and 3 above  were  timely  satisfied.  In
addition,  all  other  claims  provided  for in the Plan then  outstanding  were
settled on June 25, 1995 when the  Partnership  refinanced the then  outstanding
mortgages  encumbering  the property.  However,  the  Partnership  was unable to
satisfy the amounts due to the limited partners indicated in numbers 2, 4, and 5
above and is in default on these obligations.

To attempt to satisfy its remaining  obligations under the Plan, the Partnership
would be  required  to sell the  investment  property.  As an  alternative,  the
Partnership  could seek  authorization  from the Limited  Partners to extend the
payment date of October 20, 1998 to a future period.  The limited  partners were
approached  in  August  1998  and  asked  to  either   approve  a  sale  of  the
Partnership's  sole  investment  property or for the General Partner to petition
the  Bankruptcy  Court for an extension  of the  settlement  date.  The required
fifty-one  percent  response  was not  received.  As a result,  the  Partnership
defaulted on its  obligations  which were due on October 20,  1998.  The General
Partner is continuing to see that the  Partnership  operates its business in the
ordinary  course  while it  evaluates  the best  course  of  action  to  follow.
Additionally,   the   Partnership's   mortgage   indebtedness  of  approximately
$5,483,000  at September 30, 2001,  matures in July 2005 with a balloon  payment
due, and would require a property  sale or  refinancing  at that time.  However,
there can be no assurance  that these courses of action will be  successful  and
that the Partnership  will have sufficient funds to meet its obligations in 2001
or beyond.

In addition to its  indirect  ownership of the general  partner  interest in the
Partnership,  AIMCO and its affiliates currently own 3,229.5 limited partnership
units in the Partnership  representing 18.78% of the outstanding units. A number
of these  units were  acquired  pursuant  to tender  offers made by AIMCO or its
affiliates.  It is possible that AIMCO or its affiliates will acquire additional
limited  partnership  interests in the  Partnership  for cash or in exchange for
units in the operating  partnership of AIMCO.  Under the Partnership  Agreement,
unitholders  holding a majority  of the units are  entitled  to take action with
respect  to a  variety  of  matters,  which  would  include  voting  on  certain
amendments  to the  Partnership  Agreement  and  voting  to remove  the  General
Partner. When voting on matters, AIMCO would in all likelihood vote the Units it
acquired in a manner favorable to the interest of the General Partner because of
its affiliation with the General Partner.


<PAGE>




                           PART II - OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 6.     EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

            a)    Exhibits:

                  None.

            b)    Reports on Form 8-K:

                  None filed during the quarter ended September 30, 2001.


<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES



In accordance with the  requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant  caused
this  report to be  signed on its  behalf  by the  undersigned,  thereunto  duly
authorized.



                                    MCCOMBS REALTY PARTNERS


                                    By:   CRPTEX, INC.
                                          General Partner


                                    By:   /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                          Patrick J. Foye
                                          Executive Vice President


                                    By:   /s/Martha L. Long
                                          Martha L. Long
                                          Senior Vice President and
                                          Controller

                                    Date: November 8, 2001