alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

MAY'S DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, )

INC., individually and as class )

representative of all those gasoline )

station owners similarly situated, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-702-MEF

)

TOTAL CONTAINMENT, INC., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of Plaintiff's Response to Defendant Total Containment's

Suggestion of Bankruptcy (Doc. # 82), it is hereby

ORDERED that Total Containment shall respond to Plaintiff's Response on or

before May 18, 2007.

DONE this the 8 day of May, 2007. th

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 84 Filed 05/08/2007 Page 1 of 1
5B-i 

### APPENDIX 5B. SAMPLE TEAR

- DOWN REPORT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

5B.1 FIVE

- HORSEPOWER NEMA DESI GN B, 4

- POLE ELECTRIC MOTOR TEAR

DOWN REPORT ................................................................................................................ 1

LIST OF TABLES

Table 5B.1 Sample Bill of Materials of a 5

- HP NEMA Design B

, Electric Motor

...... ............... .. 

### 25B-1 

### APPENDIX 5B. SAMPLE TEAR

- DOWN REPORT

5B.1 FIVE

- HORSEPOWER NEMA DESI GN B , 4- POLE ELECTRIC MOTOR TEAR

DOWN REPORT

The U.S. Department of Energy ( DOE ) derived the electric motor production and

material costs for the engineering analysis by purchasing a sample of electric motors , and then

having a professional motor testing laboratory disassemble each motor and inventory the

component parts

. DOE performed tear downs on the electric motors representing candidate

standard level ( CSL ) 0, CSL 1, CSL 2, and CSL 3 for the National Electrical Manufacturers

Association ( NEMA ) Design B equipment-class group (equipment-class group 1), as well as

electric motors representing CSL 0 for the NEMA Design C equipment- class grou p (equipment

class group 2) . These tear -downs provided DOE the necessary data to construct a bill of

materials that DOE could normalize, using a standard cost model and markup, to produce a

projected manufacturer selling price. Table 5B.1 shows a sample tear -down report for one of the

five -horsepower (5

- HP) NEMA Design B , 4-pole, totally enclosed, fan cooled electric motors

purchased by DOE.

Table 5B.1 Sample Tear -D own Report of a 5- HP

, NEMA Design B

, Electric Motor

Stator Assembly

Steel Laminations 22.1 lb

Copper Wire 10.1 lb

Rotor Assembly

Steel Laminations 12.4 lb

Aluminum (Cast) 2.9 lb

Shaft 4.8 lb

Front Bearing 1.0 ea

Back Bearing 1.0 ea

Frame Costs

Frame and Base Mount 9.1 lb

Static Frame HW Costs

Terminal Housing 1.0 lb

Rear

- End Bell Cast 2.1 lb

Drive

- End Bell Cast 12.0 lb

Fan Cover 1.4 lb

Stator Insulation

Slot Liner (Nomex) 3.7 sq

- ft

Top Stick (Nomex) 3.7 sq

- ft

Coil Extension Insulation (Phase Paper) 1.0 sq

- ft

Lead Wire Thermal Insulation Sleeve 1.0 Ea

Lead Wire 0.25 lb

Lace Cord 37.0 ft5B-2 Varnish 0.03 Gal

Miscellaneous Hardware

Fan Cover (Plastic) 1.0 ea

Fan (Plastic) 1.0 ea

Fan Spring Clip (Steel) 1.0 ea

Axial Thrust Nut Ring 2 Holes (Steel) 1.0 ea

Thrust Bolt Cover (Rubber) 1.0 ea

Wave Spring (Steel) 1.0 ea

Terminal Housing Cover (Steel) 1.0 ea

Terminal Housing Base Gasket (Foam) 1.0 ea

Terminal Housing Cover Gasket (Foam) 1.0 ea

Lifting Eye 1.0 ea

Grease Port Bolts 4.0 ea

Grounding Screw 1.0 ea

Terminal Housing Mounting Bolts (1/4 -20 x .5) 4.0 ea

Terminal Housing Cover Bolts (#10 x .375) 2.0 ea

Axial Thrust Bolts (#10 x 1.75) 2.0 ea

Stator Tie Bolts (6 mm x 10.5) 4.0 ea

Fan Cover Bolts (1/4-20 x .5) 2.0 ea
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 37 Filed 12/14/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 37 Filed 12/14/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 37 Filed 12/14/2006 Page 3 of 3
#### In the Matter of Jeanne M. Costa, Respondent, v. Roger Costa, Appellant.

In a support proceeding pursuant to article 4 of the Family Court Act, the appeals are from two orders of the Family Court, Nassau County (1) one dated July 16, 1969 and entered September 24, 1969, which, *inter alia,*directed appellant to pay $100 per week for the support of his four children and to continue paying the mortgage, fuel and utility charges upon the marital home of the parties and also medical, dental and hospital insurance costs, and (2) one dated September 24, 1969 and entered October 21, 1969, which denied appellant’s motion (a) to set aside the decision upon which the July 16, 1969 order was made and (b) to render a new decision or to grant a new trial. Appeal from order dated September 24, 1969, dismissed, without costs. No appeal as of right lies from a nondispositional order of the Family Court (Family Ct. Act, § 1112); in any event, no appeal lies from an order denying a motion for a new trial, made only on the trial minutes. Order dated July 16, 1969, modified, on the law and the facts and in the exercise of discretion, by striking from the second decretal paragraph the figure *“*$100.00 ” in each of the two places it appears and substituting therefore the figure *“*$80 ”, so that appellant shall be required to pay $80 weekly for the support of his four children in addition to paying the mortgage, fuel, utility, medical, dental and insurance costs. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the record discloses that the weekly award of child support was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Christ, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Munder and Brennan, JJ., concur.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

RICHARD MARSHALL, *

*

v. * Civil Case No. 2:06-cv-701-ID-WO

*

CHRIS WEST, in his individual capacity, *

LASHUN HUTSON, in his individual capacity *

Defendants. *

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

COMES NOW Carol Gerard to enter her appearance as one of the attorneys for Plaintiff

herein and respectfully requests of the Court and all parties that she be served with process and all

needful papers.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED on this the __8th__ day of August, 2007.

/s/ CAROL GERARD 

Carol Gerard

Law Offices of Jay Lewis, LLC

P.O. Box 5059

Montgomery, AL 36103

(334) 263-7733 (Voice)

(334) 832-4390 (Fax)

carolgerard@JayLewisLaw.com

ASB-1075-L66G

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 8, 2007, I electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court

the foregoing document through the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing

to the following individuals:

Daryl Masters

Gary Willford

/s/ CAROL GERARD 

Carol Gerard

Case 2:06-cv-00701-ID-CSC Document 23 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

Law Offices of Jay Lewis, LLC

P.O. Box 5059

Montgomery, AL 36103

(334) 263-7733 (Voice)

(334) 832-4390 (Fax)

carolgerard@JayLewisLaw.com

ASB-1075-L66G

Case 2:06-cv-00701-ID-CSC Document 23 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 2 of 2
# SUBCHAPTER B - COMPETITION AND ACQUISITION PLANNING

- PART 1405 - PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONS 
- PART 1406 - COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS 
- PART 1407 - ACQUISITION PLANNING 
- PART 1408 - REQUIRED SOURCES OF SUPPLIES AND SERVICES 
- PART 1409 - CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS 
- PARTS 1410-1412 [RESERVED] 

- PART 1405 - PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONS    - Subpart 1405.2 - Synopses of Proposed Contract Actions     - 1405.202   Exceptions.
    - 1405.207   Preparation and transmittal of synopses.
  - Subpart 1405.3 - Synopses of Contract Awards     - 1405.303   Announcement of contract awards.
  - Subpart 1405.4 - Release of Information     - 1405.403   Requests from Members of Congress.
    - 1405.404   Release of long-range acquisition estimates.
    - 1405.404-1   Release procedures.
  - Subpart 1405.5 - Paid Advertisements     - 1405.502   Authority.
- PART 1406 - COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS    - Subpart 1406.2 - Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources     - 1406.202   Establishing or maintaining alternative sources.
  - Subpart 1406.3 - Other Than Full and Open Competition     - 1406.302   Circumstances permitting other than full and open competition.
    - 1406.302-1   Only one responsible source and no other supplies or services will satisfy agency requirements.
    - 1406.302-7   Public interest.
    - 1406.303   Justifications.
    - 1406.303-70   Additional requirements.
    - 1406.304   Approval of the justification.
  - Subpart 1406.5 - Competition Advocates     - 1406.501   Requirement.
    - 1406.502   Duties and responsibilities.
- PART 1407 - ACQUISITION PLANNING    - Subpart 1407.1 - Acquisition Plans     - 1407.102   Policy.
  - Subpart 1407.3 - Contractor Versus Government Performance     - 1407.301   Policy.
    - 1407.307   Appeals.
- PART 1408 - REQUIRED SOURCES OF SUPPLIES AND SERVICES    - Subpart 1408.1 - Excess Personal Property     - 1408.102   Policy.
  - Subpart 1408.8 - Acquisition of Printing and Related Supplies     - 1408.802   Policy.
- PART 1409 - CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS    - Subpart 1409.2 - Qualifications Requirements     - 1409.202   Policy.
    - 1409.206   Acquisitions subject to qualification requirements.
    - 1409.206-1   General.
  - Subpart 1409.4 - Debarment, Suspension, and Ineligibility     - 1409.403   Definitions.
    - 1409.404   Excluded Parties List System (EPLS).
    - 1409.405   Effect of listing.
    - 1409.405-1   Continuation of current contracts.
    - 1409.406   Debarment.
    - 1409.406-1   General.
    - 1409.406-3   Procedures.
    - 1409.407   Suspension.
    - 1409.407-1   General.
    - 1409.407-3   Procedures.
  - Subpart 1409.5 - Organizational and Consultant Conflicts of Interest     - 1409.503   Waiver.
    - 1409.506   Procedures.
- PARTS 1410-1412 [RESERVED]
#### In the Matter of Donald G. Smith, Petitioner, v Ormand N. Gale et al., Respondents.

Petition unanimously dismissed (see *People v Lewis,*29 *582NY2d 923; *People v Webb,*52 AD2d 8). (Art 78.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Hancock, Jr., Callahan and Witmer, JJ. (Order entered Sept. 11, 1980.)
BARBARA JEFFERS and

JOAN CRAIG,

Plaintiffs,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

v.

RUSSELL COUNTY BOARD OF

EDUCATION, et al.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 3:06-cv-685-WKW

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND

TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

COMES NOW Plaintiff, through counsel, and makes this Motion to Extend Time For

Plaintiff To Respond to Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment and would show

unto the Court:

1. Defendant Russell County Board of Education filed a Motion for Summary

Judgment, with accompanying brief, on December 14, 2007.

2 The Court gave Plaintiff until January 4, 2008 to respond to the motion.

3 Defendant Charles Nacrelli filed a Motion for Summary Judgment, with

accompanying brief, on December 17, 2007.

4. Together the motions, briefs and exhibits total a few hundred pages and cite

numerous cases.

5. Plaintiffs’ counsel’s office will be closed at least three days, in addition to

weekends, during the holiday period between the present and January 4, 2007.

6. Plaintiffs’ counsel needs just one additional week to adequately respond to the

motions for summary judgment.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs’ counsel moves the Court to grant a one-week extension for

filing the responses so that the deadline to have the responses to the Court and

Defendants’ attorneys would be up to and including January 11, 2008.

Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 44-2 Filed 12/20/2007 Page 1 of 2
Respectfully,

/s/W. Don Eddins (ASB-1424-S65W)

Attorney for Plaintiffs

337 E. Magnolia Avenue

Auburn, AL 36830

(334) 821-9981

Facsimile (334) 826-7700

doneddins@charter.net

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, W. Don Eddins, counsel for Plaintiffs, hereby certify that on the 20th day of

December, 2007, I have electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of Court using

the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following:

Sydney S. Smith, Esq.

Smith and Smith

Attorney for Russell Co. Bd. of Education

1503 Broad Street

Phenix City, AL 36830

ssmith4843@aol.com

Matthew C. Williams, Esq.

Estes, Sanders & Williams, LLC

Attorney from Mr. Nacrelli

3800 Colonnade Parkway, Ste. 330

Birmingham, AL 35243

matt@asw-law.com

/s/W. Don Eddins (ASB-1424-S65W)

Attorney for Plaintiffs

Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 44-2 Filed 12/20/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### § 986.87 Compliance.

Except as provided in this subpart, no handler shall handle pecans, the handling of which has been prohibited by the Secretary in accordance with provisions of this part, or the rules and regulations thereunder.
# SUBCHAPTER F - SPECIAL CATEGORIES OF CONTRACTING

- PART 1434 [RESERVED] 
- PART 1435 - RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING 
- PART 1436 - CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS 
- PART 1437 - SERVICE CONTRACTING 
- PARTS 1438-1441 [RESERVED] 

- PART 1434 [RESERVED]   
- PART 1435 - RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING    - 1435.010   Scientific and technical reports.
- PART 1436 - CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS    - Subpart 1436.2 - Special Aspects of Contracting for Construction     - 1436.209   Construction contracts with architect-engineer firms.
    - 1436.270   Preparation of solicitations and contracts for construction.
    - 1436.270-1   Uniform contract format.
    - 1436.270-2   Part I - The Schedule.
    - 1436.270-3   Part II - Contract clauses.
    - 1436.270-4   Part III - Documents, exhibits and other attachments.
    - 1436.270-5   Part IV - Representations and instructions.
  - Subpart 1436.5 - Contract Clauses     - 1436.570   Prohibition against use of lead-based paint.
    - 1436.571   Additive and deductive items.
  - Subpart 1436.6 - Architect-Engineer Services     - 1436.602   Selection of firms for architect-engineer contracts.
    - 1436.602-1   Selection criteria.
    - 1436.602-2   Evaluation boards.
    - 1436.602-3   Evaluation board functions.
    - 1436.602-4   Selection authority.
    - 1436.602-5   Short selection processes for contracts not to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold.
    - 1436.603   Collecting data on and appraising firms' qualifications.
- PART 1437 - SERVICE CONTRACTING    - Subpart 1437.1 - Service Contracts - General     - 1437.102   Policy.
    - 1437.103   Contracting officer responsibility.
    - 1437.170   Special service contract requirements.
  - Subpart 1437.70 - Appraisal Services (Real Property)     - 1437.7000   Scope of subpart.
    - 1437.7001   Contractor qualification requirements.
    - 1437.7002   Appraisal standards.
  - Subpart 1437.71 - Information Collection Services     - 1437.7100   Scope of subpart.
    - 1437.7101   General.
    - 1437.7102   Clauses.
- PARTS 1438-1441 [RESERVED]
Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 20 Filed 10/06/2006 Page 1 of 1
§ 983.53 Testing of minimal quantities. ( a ) *Aflatoxin.* Handlers who handle less than 1 million pounds of assessed weight per year have the option of utilizing both of the following methods for testing for aflatoxin: ( 1 ) The handler may have an inspector sample and test his or her entire inventory of hulled and dried pistachios for the aflatoxin certification before further processing.
( 2 ) The handler may segregate receipts into various lots at the handler's discretion and have an inspector sample and test each specific lot. Any lots that are found to have less aflatoxin than the level established by the committee and approved by the Secretary can be certified by an inspector to be negative as to aflatoxin. Any lots that are found to have aflatoxin exceeding the level established by the committee and approved by the Secretary may be tested after reworking in the same manner as specified in § 983.52.
( b ) *Quality.* The committee may, with the approval of the Secretary, establish regulations regarding the testing of minimal quantities of pistachios for quality.
[74 FR 56540, Nov. 2, 2009, as amended at 77 FR 36123, June 18, 2012]
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3531 

To appropriate $430,000,000 for medical care for veterans and $70,000,000 

to improve the security for personal data of veterans held by the Department of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 16, 2006 

Mrs. MURRAY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Appropriations 

A BILL 

To appropriate $430,000,000 for medical care for veterans 

and $70,000,000 to improve the security for personal 

data of veterans held by the Department of Veterans 

Affairs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the following sum is appropriated, out of any money 

4 in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the De5 partment of Veterans Affairs for the fiscal year ending 

6 September 30, 2006, namely: 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 3531 IS 

1 DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

2 VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION

3 MEDICAL SERVICES

4 For an additional amount for ‘‘Medical Services’’, 

5 $430,000,000: Provided, That of the amount under this 

6 heading, $168,000,000 shall be available to address the 

7 needs of servicemembers in need of mental health care, 

8 including post-traumatic stress disorder: Provided further, 

9 That of the amount under this heading, $80,000,000 shall 

10 be available for the provision of readjustment counseling 

11 under section 1712A of title 38, United States Code (com12 monly referred to as ‘‘Vet Centers’’): Provided further, 

13 That of the amount under this heading $182,000,000 

14 shall be available to meet current and pending care and 

15 treatment requirements: Provided further, That the 

16 amount under this heading shall remain available until ex17 pended: Provided further, That the amount provided under 

18 this heading is designated as an emergency requirement 

19 pursuant to section 402 of H. Con. Res. 95 (109th Con20 gress), the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal 

21 year 2006. 

22 DEPARTMENTAL ADMINISTRATION

23 GENERAL OPERATING EXPENSES

24 For an additional amount for ‘‘General Operating 

25 Expenses’’ for necessary expenses to improve the security 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

•S 3531 IS 

1 for personal data of veterans held by the Department of 

2 Veterans Affairs and to provide remedial assistance to vet3 erans who have had personal data stolen from the Depart4 ment of Veterans Affairs, $70,000,000: Provided, That 

5 the amount under this heading shall remain available until 

6 expended: Provided further, That the amount provided 

7 under this heading is designated as an emergency require8 ment pursuant to section 402 of H. Con. Res. 95 (109th 

9 Congress), the concurrent resolution on the budget for fis10 cal year 2006. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
§ 983.67 Random verification audits. ( a ) All handlers' pistachio inventory shall be subject to random verification audits by the committee to ensure compliance with the terms of the order, and regulations adopted pursuant thereto.
( b ) Committee staff or agents of the committee, based on information from the industry or knowledge of possible violations, may make buys of handler product in retail locations. If it is determined that violations of the order have occurred as a result of the buys, the matter will be referred to the Secretary for appropriate action.
[69 FR 17850, Apr. 4, 2004. Redesignated at 74 FR 56541, Nov. 2, 2009]
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLUS, INCORPORATED FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
FEBRUARY 28, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                                          17,235
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  326,636
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     21,777
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               292,109
<PP&E>                                         152,275
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,024
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 560,710
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           84,231
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    466,600
<COMMON>                                        40,328
<OTHER-SE>                                     <38,449>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   560,710
<SALES>                                        241,807
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               257,918
<CGS>                                          205,860
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  205,860
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               146,493
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,143
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                <94,435>
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            <94,435>
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   <94,435>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION

CHRISTINE BENNETT, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 1:06cv723-MHT

) 

ARMY FLEET SUPPORT LLC, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion to extend deadline

(doc. no. 30) is granted. 

DONE, this the 24th day of May, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 31 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 1 of 1
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

RALPH WILSON LINGO, )

)

 Petitioner, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06-CV-703-MHT

)

STATE OF ALABAMA, et al., )

)

 Respondents. )

ORDER ON MOTION

Upon consideration of the motion for hearing filed by the petitioner on May 6, 2008

(Court Doc. No. 59), and for good cause, it is

ORDERED that this motion be and is hereby DENIED. 

Done this 7th day of May, 2008.

 /s/ Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00703-MHT-CSC Document 61 Filed 05/07/2008 Page 1 of 1