# FINAL

2009 REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN AIR POLLUTION CONTROL

DISTRICT

JULY 13 , 2010

### IMPERIAL COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DI STRICT 2 009 REASONABLY AVAIL ABLE CONTROL TECHNOL OGY (RACT) STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (SIP)

Page 1 of 

### 48 BACKGROUND

On May 3, 1971, the first implementation plan for the Imperial County Air Pollution Control District (Air District) was presented and subsequently adopted by the Air Pollution Control District Board in Imperial County. Five months later, the A ir District adopted the rules and regulations as prescribed by the implementation plan making the Imperial County an effective part of the Southeast Desert Air Basin (SEDAB) control plan. On or about December 2, 1977 Imperial County was declared a rural

n onattainment area for photochemical oxidant matter by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) . As outlined by the E nvironmental P rotection A gency (EPA) , rural nonattainment areas were not required to prepare nonattainment plans but were required to adop t all Reasonably Available Control M easures (RACMS). Conforming to section 107(d) of the federal Clean Air Act (CAA) the Air District adopted on October 31, 1978 its “Imperial County Plan to Attain National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Oxidants.” Thi s plan revision was formally adopted by the C ARB as a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision on February 20, 1979. Revisions to the plan continued meeting the requirements of the CAA until the adoption of the 1990 Amendments to the CAA (CAA Amendments)

.
The CAA Amendments gives the states primary re sponsibility for achieving the National A mbient Air Quality S tandards (NAAQS). The NAAQS are set by the EPA as the maximum concentrations in the atmosphere for specific air contaminants to protect the publi c health and welfare. The principal mechanism at the state and local level for complying with the CAA Amendments is the SIP. A SIP outlines the programs, actions, and commitments a state will carry out to implement its responsibilities under the CAA Amen dments

. The EPA must approve all SIPs before they can be implemented by state and local governments. Once approved by the EPA, a SIP becomes a legally binding document under both state and federal law, and may be enforced by either government.

After the adoption of the CAA Amendments , t he Air District was designated a Transitional 185A category nonattainment area until 1992 when the Air D istrict was reclassified as a “Marginal” nonattainment area for Ozone under the federal standard

. Soon after, the “ 19 91 Air Quality Attainment Plan ” (AQAP) , addressing the one ( 1 ) hour standard was developed and implemented to meet both the “ Marginal ” designation as prescribed by the CAA Amendments and the “Moderate” state designation

. In 1996 the Salton Sea Air Basin (SSAB) was created by which time a number of the commitments contained in the 1991 AQAP were met allowing for compliance with state and federal clean air mandates. Although EPA adopted a new standard for ozone in 1997 which triggered further evaluation of proposed future plans the Air District submitted for review and approval a “Clean Data” finding demonstrating that the Imperial County met the 1997 NAAQS

. 1

1 The EPA determined on December 3,2 009 that the Imperial County, California mod erate 8

- hour ozone nonattainment area attained the 1997 8

- hour National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAQS) for ozone. 74FR63309, December 3, 2009 

### Therefore, the Air District has developed the 20 09 8

- hour Modified Air Quality Management Plan ( 20 09 M odified AQMP) which reaffirms how the Air District

### IMPERIAL COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DI STRICT 2 009 REASONABLY AVAIL ABLE CONTROL TECHNOL OGY (RACT) STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (SIP)

Page 2 of 

### 48 will maintain attainment of the 1997 8

- hour Ozone NAAQS

. Cumulatively, t hese plans, as components of the SIP, contain the framework by which the Air District structure s i t s long range strateg ies to pr ovid e clean air for a healthy citizenry which in turn creat e s a robust commercial consumer base

. Essential to any SIP are the stationary source control measure s which outline the basic strategy that an Air District will employ to help maintain a reduction of emissions throughout the region of Imperial County . In essence, stationary source control

measure s are proven feasible industrial technique s implemented concurrently with industry practices and control devices in order to r educe ozone precursor emissi ons of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) from identified sources in Imperial County. Examples of control devices include gasoline station vapor recovery systems, landfill gas recovery systems and catalytic emission control systems found on atypical combustion devices. Fundamentally, a ny strategy de veloped and incorporated into a SIP must include an evaluation of all sta tionary source control measures which have been built upon by previous attainment plans. As stated above, the la st major attainment plan was the 1991 AQAP which addressed the federal and state one

- hour ozone standards.

Because stationary source control measures define the mechanisms for the installation and implementation of emission control techniques and devices they are the framework by which the Air District develops enforceable rules. The Air District rules cover many activities such as open burning, incineration, gasoline storage, paint solvent use, dry cleaning, asphalt paving, chrome plating, fuel combustio n and landfills. These rules are the foundation of the stationary source control strategy found within any developed SIP

. As demonstrated above SIP s are not one time documents but are living documents which require periodic evaluation, update s and mandat ed revisions in accordance with changes in scientific technology and governing law. As men tioned above

, the Air District submitted for review and approval to EPA a “clean data” demonstration

. Subsequently, the EPA reviewed the submittal and found on Dece mber 3, 2009 that the Imperial County had indeed attained the 1997 8

- hour ozone NAAQS. T he finding by EPA did not constitute a re

- designation nor a determination that the area met other requirements for re

- designation. Although the finding of attainment by EPA did suspend certain SIP related requirements it did not suspend all the requirements. One such requirement not suspended is the Subpart 2 Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for VOC’s and NOx. 2



### O zone non

- attainment areas classified at m oderate or above are required by sections 182(b)(2) and 182(f) of the CA A A mendments to implement RACT for sources subject to Control Techniques Guideline ( CTG ) documents and for all major sources of VOC and NOx that are not subject to a CTG . RACT is defi ned as the lowest emissions limitation that a particular source is capable of meeting by the application of control technology that is reasonably available considering technological and economic

2 Clean Air Act sections 182(b)(2) and 182(f)

### IMPERIAL COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DI STRICT 2 009 REASONABLY AVAIL ABLE CONTROL TECHNOL OGY (RACT) STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (SIP)

Page 3 of 

### 48 feasibility (44 F ederal R egister (FR) 53762; September 17, 19 79). In essence RACT requirements, as specified in the CAA Amendments , assure that major sources of ozone precursor emissions are contro lled to a “reasonable” extent.

As part of the implementation process as described in EPA’s “ Final Rule to Implement th e 8

- Hour Ozone NAAQS ” (70 FR 71612; November 29, 2005) a RACT demonstration is required for all areas classified as moderate non

- attainment. RACT demonstrations can be made in one of two ways ; 1) by a certification that previo usly demonstrated RACT contro ls do currently represent RACT for the 8

- hour ozone standard or 2) a new RACT determination with final implementation dates no later than the first ozone season or part there of that o ccurs thirty (30) months later. In any event, there are occasions when an air district may adopt a Negative Declaration declaring that there are no sources, either existing or anticipated, in its area that are subject to RACT requirements making the requirement to adopt a rule for those types of sources inapplicable. As prev iously mentioned, prior to being designated as a non

- attainment for the 1997 8

- hour ozone standard, the Air District maintained a subpart 2 marginal classification and as such a RACT SIP was not required

.
IMPERIAL COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT RA CT SIP EVALUATION

INTRODUCTION

40 C ode of F ederal R egulations (CFR) 51 contains all the information related to the

r equirements for the preparation, adoption and submittal of Implementation Plans, including RACT SIPs. To help the state and local air dis trict s interpret and understand the requirements for RACT SIP submittal the US EPA provided guidance in three separate letters dated March 9, 2006; A pril 4, 2006 and May 18, 2006. The first two letters March 9 th 

### and April 4 th 

### contain information concernin g the general requirements for RACT S IP submittal, including a discussion of completeness criteria and a list of current CTG documents. The letter dated May 18 th 

### is additional clarific ation for RACT SIP submittals and is found in a question and answer for mat. EPA Region 9 provided the basic framework as found in the CFR for RACT SIP submittal and is presented here for easy understanding:

1. Describe efforts to identify all source categories within the District requiring RACT, including CTG sources (i.e., co vered by an EPA Control Technique Guideline document) and major non

- CTG sources.

2. Submit negative declarations where there are no facilities major or minor within the District subject to a CTG.

3. For all categories needing RACT, list the state/local regulat ion that implements RACT. It may also be helpful to list the date EPA approved these regulations as fulfilling RACT.

### IMPERIAL COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DI STRICT 2 009 REASONABLY AVAIL ABLE CONTROL TECHNOL OGY (RACT) STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (SIP)

Page 4 of 

### 48 4. Describe the basis for concluding that the regulations fulfill RACT. Documents useful in establishing RACT include CTGs, Alternative Con trol Technique guidance (ACTs), Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) standar d s, New Source Performance Standards (NSPS), California Suggested Control Measures (SCM) and Best Available Retrofit Control Technology (BARCT) determinations, regulations adopted in other Districts, and guidance and rules developed by other state and local agencies.

5. Some Districts may use the California Air Pollution Control Officer’s Association (CAPCOA) September 2003, Potential all Feasible Measures (AFM) Report to help demonstrate RACT. If so, the RACT SIP should certify that local regulations are equivalent to AFM, justify the assumption that the AFM fulfilled RACT in 2003, and include some sort of certification/demonstration that no additional controls have become mo re reasonably available since then.

DETERMINATION OF RACT SIP

CTG Sources

While CTGs and ACTs both describe available control techniques and their cost effectiveness only CTGs d efine VOC RACT for those facilities that emit air pollutants. Those facilit ies subject to CTGs are referred to as CTG sources. EPA headquarters maintains a list of source categories and the applicable CTG in guidance documents at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/naaqs/oz one/ctg_act/index.htm



### . District staff reviewed the list of CTG documents and compared them to existing rules and sources located in Imperial County

. The review included research into all CTG documents as well as any pertinent EPA guidance. Those CTG c ategories with

asso ciated rules are found in Table 1 below and those categories without a corresponding prohibitory District rule can be found in Table 2. Table1 demonstrates the source categories, reference documents, applicable District rules, and the d ate EPA approved the corresponding district rule. Table 2 demonstrates those category sources for which the district has no source s in the county. The analysis was originally arrived at by research of the permit system, emissions inventory and enforcem en t. To further supplement the review the Air District reviewed the yellow pages pertinent to the area and general and advanced searches through the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes.

Like other districts with a heavy agricultural industry

, th e Imperial County has substantial agricultural pesticide use which is a substantial source of ROC s. Unfortunately, agricultural pesticide use is not defined as a stationary source and therefore not subject to regulation by the Air District . However, agri cultural pesticide application is not without regulation. To protect the general welfare of the public

, agricultural pesticide application is heavily regulated by the State of California.

### IMPERIAL COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DI STRICT 2 009 REASONABLY AVAIL ABLE CONTROL TECHNOL OGY (RACT) STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (SIP)

Page 5 of 

### 48 Major Non

- CTG Sources

Major n on

- CTG sources are those sources whi ch are not subject to CTG’s but for which RACT may still be required. For this evaluation District staff examined only non

- CTG sources which have the potential to emit 25 lbs or more per day of either NOx or VOC. The threshold of 25 lbs per day falls und er the category threshold for Rule 207 New and Modified Stationary Source Review ( NSR). Under NSR

, any facility that has the potential to emit 25 pounds per day or more of any nonattainment pollutant or its precursor is required to appl y Best Available Co ntrol Technology (BACT). By contrast

, the U.S. EPA, under its regulations for the 8

- hour ozone, set moderate ozone nonattainment areas new source review threshold as 100 tons per year of either ROC or NOx for major stationary sources.

Table 3 lists all o f the 100 tons per year or greater “major source” facilities within Imperial County

. Table 3 gives each facilit y permit number, facility name and the RACT SIP evaluation as it applies to each facility.

HOW DISTRICT RULES WERE DETERMINED TO MEET RACT REQU IREMENTS

As mentioned before district rules must meet RACT requirements in order to perform a proper review of the CTG documents and their applicability to the existing sources in Imperial County. Therefore, the Air District relied on the following crite ria:

Generally, d istrict rules that have been approved by EPA are considered as fulfilling RACT requirements at the time when originally approved

. If EPA evaluate s the submitted rule s using EPA guidelines and polices and determines that those submitted

r ules fulfill RACT requirements then in light of those EPA approvals District rules are sai d to have met RACT requirements so long as the length of time has not allowed for changes to occur requiring rule amendment to meet RACT. However , the Air District

u nderstands that any analysis cannot rely solel y on one form of verification. Therefore, the Air District supplement ed the RACT analysis by compar ing currently adopted rules to other Air District rules for consistency in requirements, emissions limitations and EPA approval . The consistency among Air District rules helps strengthen the determination that the same requirements and emissions limitations are fulfilling RACT.

The same control consistency among rules can be found under the CARB RACT/BARCT deter minations. To aid air districts in developing regulations to meet and maintain the state ambient air quality standards, the CARB has developed a series of RACT/BARCT determinations for specific emission source types. As mentioned before, these determinat ions promote consistency of controls for those emission sources considered similar among districts with the same air quality attainment designations. BARCT under these determinations is widely recognized to exceed RACT as long as a number of years has no t passed whereby the initial BARCT determination may no longer apply

.
Since the Air District was designat ed as a “marginal” non

- attainment area for ozone the

### IMPERIAL COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DI STRICT 2 009 REASONABLY AVAIL ABLE CONTROL TECHNOL OGY (RACT) STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (SIP)

Page 6 of 

### 48 Air District has strived to develop regulation s me eting RACT and in some cases BA CT. It is worth pointing out that in addition to the EPA finding that a rule fulfills RACT when submitted for inclusion into a SIP, the H&SC requires Air District staff to perform an analysis for each rule similar to a RACT evaluation. During this process Air District s taff reviews the corresponding requirements of CTG’s, ACT’s, federal New Source Performance Standards (NSPS), National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS) and if applicable MACT standards for the applicable source category as part of the rule development process. Each Air District rule adopted by the Air District is evaluated against applicable CTGs and ACTs, as well as against current existing State law, including a comparison against California ’s “all feasible measures” requirement. However, the “all feasible measures” analy sis was not used to evaluate this RACT SIP. Instead, it serves to maintain an assurance that rule development in Imperial County is consistent with RACT. As is required

, both C ARB and EPA review Air District ru les for a minimum applicability to RACT. Similarly, d uring the annual permit review process all existing sources are analyzed for compliance with RACT/BA CT requirements.

While all existing sources are required to meet RACT as a minimum new or modified

so urces must meet the requirements of t he District ’s NSR rule . Specifically, any new

, replacement, modified or relocated emissions units in Imperial County must apply BACT if it is determined that the source has the potential to emit 25 lbs per day or more of ROC or NOx.

RACT SIP EVALUATION FINDINGS

Table 4 presents all of the District rules District staff evaluated for applicability to the RACT SIP. All rules were identified either as applicable (defined by a CTG or applicable to a major source) or not applicable. An in depth evaluation was conducted

o nly on those rule s identified as applicable t o RACT. Given for each rule is the rule name, whether there is a corresponding CTG or ACT that appears applicable to each rule, original rule adoption date, da te of last rule amendment , Federal Register citation for EPA approval and the corresponding Federal Register publication date.

Table 5 presents summaries of the RACT evaluations for those District rules covered by a CTG or ACT. Table 5 does not include D istrict rules for which there are no corresponding CTG’s or ACTs. Table 5 includes the basis for concluding that each District rule evaluated for RACT meets or exceeds RACT. As mentioned above, EPA rule approvals of not only Imperial County rules but of other Air District rules of similar emission limitations and requirements lend strength to a certification that District rules meet RACT. Where appropriate, EPA RACT certification findings were augmented by corresponding CARB RACT/BARCT determinations. T hese CARB RACT/BARCT determinations tend to be more current and more stringent than RACT. Therefore, in addition to the EPA rule approvals, District concluded that the RACT/BARCT determinations were an appropriate basis for finding that District rules mee t RACT.

During an earlier RACT analysis, NOx regulation was found to be much more extensive

### IMPERIAL COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DI STRICT 2 009 REASONABLY AVAIL ABLE CONTROL TECHNOL OGY (RACT) STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (SIP)

Page 7 of 

### 48 in other Air Districts. Table 5 identified Rule 400, Fuel Burning Equipment as the only existing NOx rule which was found to be similar in emissions limitations t o the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District . However, San Joaquin has supplemented its general Fuel Burning Rule with four specific NOx rules

. I n order to maintain consistency the Air District adopt ed new regulation addressing NOx emissions f rom boilers, process heaters, steam generators and stationary gas turbines. Currently, these new NOx rules do not address kilns or mills. In Imperial County the only major

source operation using kilns or mills is a wallboard operation. Therefore, the A ir District is committed to developing, adopting and implementing a Wallboard Kiln and Mill rule specific to wallboard operations. Preliminary review indicates that a rule could be adopted by June 30, 2011 which would impose a NOx limit approximately with in the range of 30 to 40ppm corrected at 3% oxyg en. Preliminary review indicates that the proposed limit would fulfill RACT once adopted

. In any event, the new NOx rules 400.1 and 400.2 were adopted by the Imperial County Air Pollution Control District B oard on February 23, 2010 and submitted to CARB for inclusion into the SIP on March 15, 2010

. Along with the new NOx rules three coating rules, Rule 424 Architectural Coatings, Rule 425 Aerospace Coating Operations, and Rule 427 Automotive Refinishing Ope rations were amended according to Suggested Control Measures as recommended by CARB. It is important to note that although Rule 425 Aerospace Coating Operations was amended for consistency with other air districts there are no aerospace coating operations in existence or in operation in Imperial County. The amendment was adopted as part of a general review process.

In addition

, the Air District commenced review on the impact of Internal Combustion Engine s and the potential for a rule addressing IC Engine s. The review revealed that currently, there are no major sources of IC Engines within Imperial County

. On another note, the Air District reviewed Rules 413 and 417 for consistency with other districts

. The preliminary review has revealed that Rule 413 needs clarification regarding the exemption for unheated non

- conveyorized cleaning equipment (A.1.c) to be consistent with the recommendations stated on the Technical Support Document (TSD) issued by U.S. EPA on August 2002. Section A.1.c of Rule 413 will clarify that small cold cleaners are only exempt from add on control and not work practices. As such, work practices are being reviewed and will be amended to be consistent with other air districts.

Review of Rule 417 revealed that current limits are consistent with other air district rules. For example Rule 442 from Mojave Desert has emissions limitations for all VOC containing materials of 540 kilograms (1,190lbs) per month per facility which equates to approximately 39.66lbs per day. Similarly, Ru le 442 from Southcoast AQMD has a limitation on all VOC containing materials, equipment and processes of 833lbs of VOC per calendar month which equates to approximately 28lbs per day while the Imperial County Rule 417 limits discharge of VOC to 15lbs in an y one day but no more than 3lbs in any one hour which is in line with the San Joaquin Rule 4661

. Therefore , these rules do abide by existing CTG documents and are essentially RACT according to the determined thresholds under EPA guidance. However, amend ments to Rule 413 and 417 are scheduled to be finalized and adopted by June 30, 2011. As such

, with t he new

### IMPERIAL COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DI STRICT 2 009 REASONABLY AVAIL ABLE CONTROL TECHNOL OGY (RACT) STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (SIP)

Page 8 of 

### 48 regulation s and with current rules the Ai r District’s RACT determination is solidified.

CTG Sources

Table 2 demonstrates the CTG source categori es for which there are no sources in Imperial County . This determin ation was made by reviewing the Air District’s permit system, emissions inventory, SIC codes, research of the local yellow pages and consultation with the Enforcement Division. Of the CTG categories listed in Table 2 the Offset Lithographic Printing and Letterpress Printing CTG identified by EPA

- 453/R

- 06

- 002 dated September 2006 identified thresholds for printing facilities. In order to determine the need for an Offset Lithographic Printi ng and Letterpress Printing regulation in Imperial County the Air District conduction a facility inspection on the largest identified printing facility by SIC code in Imperial County, Imperial Printers. The inspection conducted on April 27, 2010 by Air Di strict staff revealed the potential emissions of the facility well below the threshold identified in the CTG. The Offset Lithographic Printing and Letterpress Printing CTG identified a threshold limitation of 15 pounds per day of VOC emission from inks, c leaning materials and solutions. Combined Imperial Printers potential emissions are 3.89 pounds per day well below the required threshold for the Offset Lithographic Printing and Letterpress Printing CTG. The Air District will continue to do spot inspect ions in the future to verify that potential emissions either remain the same or do not increase. As a result, t he Air District does not anticipate any of the sources listed in Table 2 in the future. Therefore, RACT determinations for those CTG source cat egories are not necessary and the Air District concludes that RACT rules for these sources are not applicable. However, should these sources locate in Imperial County in the future then they will be subject to the District’s NSR requirements which are mor e stringent than RACT. This constitutes the District’s negative declaration for the sources listed in Table 2.

Major Non

- CTG Sources

District staff evaluated all facilities with the potential to emit 25 lbs per day of NOx or VOC following the Districts NSR requirements. Those facilities are listed in Table 3, along with applicable District rules. All listed are 100 tons per year or greater the NSR threshold for moderate 8

- hour ozone non

- attainment areas. Currently, all facilities in Table 3 are requir ed to apply BACT which is much more stringent than RACT. Therefore, all of the major non

- CTG VOC and NOx sources are subject to District rules, which meet or exceed RACT.

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

Air District staff commenced its RACT SIP evaluation by re viewing all available CTGs and ACTs, comparing them to Air District rules and existing sources. For each source category Air District staff identified applicable sources and applicable Air District rules. This was accomplished by reviewing and researchin g the local yellow pages, the SIC codes, the permit system, the emissions inventory and utilization of all associated staff in engineering and enforcement.

### IMPERIAL COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DI STRICT 2 009 REASONABLY AVAIL ABLE CONTROL TECHNOL OGY (RACT) STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (SIP)

Page 9 of 

### 48 There are six (6) major stationary sources in Imperial County under the Air District’s current maj or source threshold. All listed are 100 tons per year or greater composed of one (1) ROG source and five (5) NOx sources.

The criteria used by District staff in evaluation and determination of RACT SIP rules was based on 1) EPA rule approval 2) emission limitation comparison of other Air District Rules and 3 ) RACT/BARCT determinations issued by the California Air Resources Board.

While EPA rule approval is an appr opriate basis for establishing RACT findings and although a number of years may have elapsed

, if the limits demonstrated are in accord with other current District limits and state established limits then RACT is still appropriate. That is EPA evaluate s rules when originally submitted to determine if they fulfill RACT requirements prior to approv al . When a number of ye ars have elapsed and limits have remained in accord with state and other District approved rules then RACT findings are appropriate. R ACT/BARCT determinations are an appropriate basis because they are more stringent than RACT.

FIN DINGS

– CTG SOURCES & MAJOR NON

- CTG SOURCES

Based on the foregoing, Air District staff finds that all current Air District rules that apply to ozone precursor emissions fulfill RACT requirements for the 1997 8

- hour ozone NAAQS. As such, the current rules , at a minimum, meet RACT. M oreover, District staff finds that all CTG sources and major non

- CTG sources under its jurisdiction are controlled to RACT or better standards.

RACT FINDINGS

– NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS

The Air District has reviewed its permit an d emissions inventory systems and consulted with knowledgeable Air District staff and has determined that there are no stationary sources or emitting facilities within the Air District for the CTG categories listed in Table 2. Moreover, the Air District d oes not anticipate these sources in the future. If such sources locate in Imperial County in the future then they will be subject to the Air Districts New Source Review requirements which are more stringent than RACT. This constitutes the Air District’s ne gative declarations for the 20 09 RACT SIP.

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)

The 200 9 RACT SIP is an evaluation of current Air District air pollution rules

. This RACT SIP evaluation is not an activity which causes in of itself a direct physic al change in the environment or a reasonably foreseeable indirect change in the environment. The RACT SIP evaluation is not part of a local General Plan or element thereof. The RACT SIP is not supported in whole or in part through a public agency contrac t, grant, subsidy, loan or other form of assistance. Finally, there are no discretionary approvals involving leases, permits, licenses, certificates or other entitlements associated with this RACT

### IMPERIAL COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DI STRICT 2 009 REASONABLY AVAIL ABLE CONTROL TECHNOL OGY (RACT) STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (SIP)

Page 10 of 

### 48 SIP evaluation. Therefore, adoption of the proposed 200 9 RACT SIP is not a “Project” as defined in Section 15378(a) of the CEQA Guidelines and therefore is not subject to CEQA review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3).

# TABLE 1 - Source Categories, CTG/ACT List and Applicable District Rules

FINAL RACT SIP ADOPTED JULY 13, 2010 SOURCE ICAPCD DATE LAST FEDERAL REGISTER CATEGORY REFERENCED DOCUMENT APPLICABILITY RULE ADOPTED AMENDED RULE APPROVAL

Gasoline Service Stations Design Criteria for Stage I Vapor Control Systems – Gasoline Service Stations (PDF 15 pp, 766KB) EPA450/R-75-102 1975/11 Control of gasoline vapors during storage tank filling (Stage I sources). Vehicle fueling (Stage II sources). 415 Transfer and Storage of Gasoline 11/4/1977 5/18/2004 70 FR 8520 02/22/2005

Tank Trucks, Gasoline Loading Terminals Control of Hydrocarbons from Tank Truck Gasoline Loading Terminals (PDF 62 pp, 1.6MB) EPA-450/2-77- 026 1977/10 Control of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) from tank truck terminals with daily throughputs of greater than 76,000 liters (20,077 gallons) of gasoline 415 Transfer and Storage of Gasoline 11/4/1977 5/18/2004 70 FR 8520 02/22/2005

Bulk Gasoline Plants Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Bulk Gasoline Plants (PDF 49 pp, 1.3MB) EPA-450/2-77-035 1977/12 Control VOC emissions from bulk plants with daily throughputs of 76,000 liters (20,077 gallons) of gasoline or less. Bulk gasoline plants are typically secondary distribution facilities which receive gasoline from bulk terminals via trailer and store it in above ground storage tanks. 415 Transfer and Storage of Gasoline 11/4/1977 5/18/2004 70 FR 8520 02/22/2005

External Floating Roof Tanks, Petroleum Liquid Storage in Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Petroleum Liquid Storage in External Floating Roof Tanks (PDF 66 pp, 2.0MB) EPA-450/2-78-047 1978/12 This document is related to the control of volatile organic compounds (VOC) from the storage of petroleum liquids in external floating roof tanks. Rule 414 - Storage of Reactive Organic Compound

Liquids 12/11/1979 5/18/2004 73 FR 70883 11/24/2008

Tank Trucks, Gasoline and Vapor Collection Systems Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Gasoline Tank Trucks and Vapor Collection Systems (PDF 32 pp, 887KB) EPA-450/2-78-051 1978/12 This document is related to the control of volatile organic compounds (VOC) from gasoline tank trucks and vapor collection systems at bulk terminals, bulk plants and service stations. The intent is to define leak tight conditions and related test procedures for vapor collection systems and tank trucks while loading and unloading at these facilities. VOC emitted from leaks in collection equipment are primarily C 4 and C 5 paraffins and olefins which are photochemically reactive. 415 Transfer and Storage of Gasoline 11/4/1977 5/18/2004 70 FR 8520 02/22/2005

Solvent Metal Cleaning Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Solvent Metal Cleaning (PDF 229 pp, 7.0MB) EPA-450/2-77-022 1977/11 Applies to organic solvent degreasing operations. The categories are cold cleaners, open top vapor degreasers and conveyorized degreasers. 413 Organic Solvent Degreasing Operations 1/16/2001 67 FR 67313 11/05/2002 PETROLEUM (ROG)

COATINGS AND SOLVENTS (ROG)

# TABLE 1 - Source Categories, CTG/ACT List and Applicable District Rules

FINAL RACT SIP ADOPTED JULY 13, 2010 SOURCE ICAPCD DATE LAST FEDERAL REGISTER CATEGORY REFERENCED DOCUMENT APPLICABILITY RULE ADOPTED AMENDED RULE APPROVAL

Storage of Petroleum Liquids in Fixed Roof Tanks Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Storage of Petroleum Liquids in Fixed-Roof Tanks (PDF 43 pp, 1.1MB) EPA-450/2-77-036 1977/12 Control of VOC emissions from the storage of petroleum liquids affecting facilities with fixed roof storage tanks with greater than 150,000 liter (39,626 gallons) capacity with a true vapor pressure greater than 10.5 kilo-Pascals. This does not apply to tanks with external floating roofs or storage tanks having capacities less than 1,600,000 liters used to store crude oil. Rule 414 - Storage of Reactive Organic Compound

Liquids 12/11/1979 5/18/2004 73 FR 70883 11/24/2008

Industrial Cleaning Solvents Control Techniques Guidelines for Industrial Cleaning Solvents (PDF 290 pp, 7.6MB) EPA-453/R-06-001 2006/09 This document specifies RACT for industrial cleaning solvents resulting in a an evaluation of sources of VOC emissions from the use of industrial cleaning solvents. This category of consumer and commercial products includes the industrial cleaning solvents used by many industries. It includes such products that are used to remove contaminants such as adhesives, inks, paint, dirt, soil, oil and grease. 417 Organic Solvents 9/14/1999 67 FR 67313 11/05/2002

Cutback Asphalt Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Use of Cutback Asphalt (PDF 18 pp, 481KB) EPA-450/2-77-037 1977/12 This document addresses the control of volatile organic compounds (VOC) from paving asphalts liquefied with petroleum distillate. Such liquefied asphalt is generally referred to as cutback asphalt. The substitution of emulsions for cutback asphalt nearly eliminates the release of VOC air pollutants from paving operations. The VOC emitted from the cutback asphalts are photochemically reactive (precursors to oxidants). 426 Cutback Asphalt and Emulsified

Paving 9/14/1999 66 FR 20084 04/19/2001

413 Organic Solvent Degreasing Operations 1/16/2001 67 FR 67313 11/05/2002

427 Automotive Refinishing Operations 9/14/1999 2/23/2010 66 FR 50319 Version dated

09/14/1999 approved by EPA

on 10/03/2001

02/23/2010 submitted for review STATIONARY SOURCE (ROG) COATINGS AND SOLVENTS (ROG)

Automobile Refinishing Reduction of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Automobile Refinishing (PDF 112 pp, 896KB) EPA450/3-88-009 1988/10 This document identifies automobile refinishing operations and categorizes them into four process steps. Vehicle preparation, primer application, topcoat application and spray equipment cleanup. The emissions of the VOC's are a result of organic solvent evaporation during vehicle preparation and equipment cleanup and during and shortly after the application of primers and topcoats.

# TABLE 1 - Source Categories, CTG/ACT List and Applicable District Rules

FINAL RACT SIP ADOPTED JULY 13, 2010 SOURCE ICAPCD DATE LAST FEDERAL REGISTER CATEGORY REFERENCED DOCUMENT APPLICABILITY RULE ADOPTED AMENDED RULE APPROVAL

Aerospace Aerospace MACT (PDF 37 pp, 5.6MB) 59 FR-29216 6/06/94 1994/06 This limits the emissions of hazardous air pollutants (HAP) from new and existing commercial, civil and military aerospace original equipment manufacturing (OEM) and rework facilities that are major sources of HAP emissions. Note – See also EPA-453/R-97-004. Rule 425 Aerospace

Coating Operations 8/5/1989 2/23/2010 70 FR 28826 Version dated

05/18/2004 approved by EPA

on 05/19/2005

02/23/2010 submitted for review

Aerospace Aerospace (CTG & MACT) (PDF 62 pp, 288KB) EPA-453/R-97-004 1997/12 This documents explains the Control Techniques for the control of VOC emissions from coatings and solvents used in the aerospace industry.

- Supersedes any potential applicability of the Miscellaneous Metal Part and Products requirements for manufacturing Note – See also 59 FR-29216, June 6, 1994. Rule 425 Aerospace

Coating Operations 8/5/1989 2/23/2010 70 FR 28826 Version dated

05/18/2004 approved by EPA

on 05/19/2005

02/23/2010 submitted for review

400 Fuel Burning Equipment -

Oxides of Nitrogen 2/21/1972 9/14/1999 68 FR 14161 Version dated 9/14/1999 approved by EPA on 03/24/2003 400.1 Stationary Gas Turbines 2/23/2010 Submitted to EPA for review

403 General Limitations on the Discharge of Air Contaminants 11/19/1985 5/18/2004 69 FR 67058 11/16/2004 STATIONARY SOURCE NOx NOx Emissions from Stationary Combustion Turbines (PDF 399 pp, 1.2MB) EPA-453/R-93-007 1993/01 STATIONARY SOURCE (ROG)

Stationary Combustion Turbines This document identifies as a category stationary gas turbines as emitting more than 25 tons of Nitrogen oxide (NOx) per year. NOx emission levels and ACT must be analyzed for applicability for every gas turbine according to the size and design of the turbine, theoperating duty cycle, site conditions, and other sitespecific factors must be taken into considertion.

# TABLE 1 - Source Categories, CTG/ACT List and Applicable District Rules

FINAL RACT SIP ADOPTED JULY 13, 2010 SOURCE ICAPCD DATE LAST FEDERAL REGISTER CATEGORY REFERENCED DOCUMENT APPLICABILITY RULE ADOPTED AMENDED RULE APPROVAL

403 General Limitations on the Discharge of Air Contaminants 11/19/1985 5/18/2004 69 FR 67058 11/16/2004

400.2 Boilers, Process Heaters and Steam Generators 2/23/2010 Submitted to EPA for review

400 Fuel Burning Equipment -

Oxides of Nitrogen 2/21/1972 9/14/1999 68 FR 14161 Version dated 9/14/1999 approved by EPA on 03/24/2003 403 General Limitations on the Discharge of Air Contaminants 11/19/1985 5/18/2004 69 FR 67058 11/16/2004

400 Fuel Burning Equipment -

Oxides of Nitrogen 2/21/1972 9/14/1999 68 FR 14161 Version dated 9/14/1999 approved by EPA on 03/24/2003 403 General Limitations on the Discharge of Air Contaminants 11/19/1985 5/18/2004 69 FR 67058 11/16/2004 Cement Manufacturing NOx Emissions from Cement Manufacturing (PDF 198 pp, 624KB) EPA-453/R-94-004 1994/03 Note – Updated September 2000. Process Heaters

Stationary Internal Combustion Engines This document has identified process heaters as a category which emits more than 25 tons of nitrogen oxide (NOx) per year. This document identifies ACT for the control of NOx emissions from prcess heaters. STATIONARY SOURCE NOx

This document identifies cement kilns as a stationary source which emits more than 25 tons of nitrogen oxide (NOx) per year. There are four different types of cement kilns used in the industry: long wet kiln, long dry kilns, kilns with a preheater and kilns with a precalciner. This document identifies stationary reciprocating engines as emitting more than 25 tons of nitrogen oxide (NOx) per year. The ACT and corresponding achievable Nox emission levels may not be applicable for every reciprocating engine application. The size and design of the engine, the operating duty cycle, site conditions and other site-specific factors must be taken into consideration and the suitability of an alternative control technique must be determined on a case by case basis. NOx Emissions from Stationary Internal Combustion Engines (PDF 340 pp, 13.3MB) EPA-453/R-93-032 1993/07 Note – Updated September 2000. NOx Emissions from Process Heaters (PDF 277 pp, 2.5MB) EPA-453/R-93- 034 1993/09 Note – Revised September 1993.

# TABLE 1 - Source Categories, CTG/ACT List and Applicable District Rules

FINAL RACT SIP ADOPTED JULY 13, 2010 SOURCE ICAPCD DATE LAST FEDERAL REGISTER CATEGORY REFERENCED DOCUMENT APPLICABILITY RULE ADOPTED AMENDED RULE APPROVAL

403 General Limitations on the Discharge of Air Contaminants 11/19/1985 5/18/2004 69 FR 67058 11/16/2004

400.2 Boilers, Process Heaters and Steam Generators 2/23/2010 Submitted to EPA for review

403 General Limitations on the Discharge of Air Contaminants 11/19/1985 5/18/2004 69 FR 67058 11/16/2004

400.2 Boilers, Process Heaters and Steam Generators 2/23/2010 Submitted to EPA for review Industrial, Commercial and Institutional Boilers

Utility Boilers This document identifies industrial, commercial and institutional (ICI) boilers as source categories which emit more than 25 tons of oxides of nitrogen (NOx) per year. ICI boilers include steam and hot water generators, the applications for these boilers range from commercial space heating to proces steam generation. The furnace design, method of fuel firing, condition of existing equipment, operating duty cycle, site conditions, and other site-specific factors must be taken into consideration to properly evaluate the applicability and performance of any given control technique. NOx Emissions from Industrial, Commercial & Institutional Boilers (PDF 589 pp, 776KB) EPA-453/R-94- 022 1994/03 STATIONARY SOURCE NOx

Alternative Control Techniques Document – NOx Emissions from Utility Boilers (PDF 538 pp, 18.8MB) EPA-453/R-94-023 1994/03 This document identifies fossil fuel fired utility boilers as sources which emit more than 25 tons of nitrogen oxide (NOx) per year. Three principal NOx forms are "thermal" NOx, "prompt" NOx, and "fuel" NOx. Thermal and fuel NOx account for the majority of the NOx formed in coal - and oil-fired utility boilers.

# TABLE 1 - Source Categories, CTG/ACT List and Applicable District Rules

FINAL RACT SIP ADOPTED JULY 13, 2010 SOURCE ICAPCD DATE LAST FEDERAL REGISTER CATEGORY REFERENCED DOCUMENT APPLICABILITY RULE ADOPTED AMENDED RULE APPROVAL

400 Fuel Burning Equipment -

Oxides of Nitrogen 2/21/1972 9/14/1999 68 FR 14161 Version dated 9/14/1999 approved by EPA on 03/24/2003 400.1 Stationary Gas Turbines 2/23/2010 Submitted to EPA for review

400.2 Boilers, Process Heaters and Steam Generators 2/23/2010 Submitted to EPA for review

403 General Limitations on the Discharge of Air Contaminants 11/19/1985 5/18/2004 69 FR 67058 11/16/2004 Stationary Sources - Second Edition Control Techniques for Nitrogen Oxides Emissions from Stationary Sources – Second Edition (PDF 396 pp, 14.0MB) EPA-450/1-78-001 1978/01 Note – This document is the second edition of the EPA document entitled: Control Techniques for Nitrogen Oxides Emissions This guidance document stress the importance of equipment process conditions and fuel type as important in the determination of Nox emissions, the characterization of emissions and the evaluation of control potential. Detailed classification of stationary sources according to factors known to influence NOx formation. STATIONARY SOURCE NOx

# TABLE 2 - CTG/ACT Listing with no applicable sources

FNAL RACT SIP ADOPTED JULY 13, 2010 ICAPCD DATE LAST APPLIED RULE ADOPTED AMENDED SOURCES VOC Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources

– Volume II: Surface Coating of Cans, Coils, Paper, Fabrics, Automobiles, and Light-Duty Trucks (PDF 232 pp, 2.7MB) EPA450/2-77-008 1977/05 Applies to Automobile and light duty truck, can, coil, fabric and paper coating operations. The limitations are stated in terms of solvent content of the coating and are different for the Can Industry, Coil Coating Industry, Fabric Coating, Paper Coating and Automotive and Light Duty Truck Assembly Plants. There are no known sources of this type in Imperial County. 1101 - New Source Performance

Standards

(NSPS) 9/14/1999 No Sources

VOC Control of Refinery Vacuum Producing Systems, Wastewater Separators, and Process Unit Turnarounds (PDF 50 pp, 1.3MB) EPA-450/2-77-025 1977/10 Control of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) from petroleum refineries specifically vacuum producing systems, wastewater separators and process unit turnarounds. There are no known sources of this type in Imperial County 1101 - New Source Performance

Standards

(NSPS) 9/14/1999 No Sources

VOC Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources

– Volume III: Surface Coating of Metal Furniture (PDF 66 pp, 1.9MB) EPA-450/2-77-032 1977/12 VOC reductions of surface coating of metal furniture. Metal furniture includes any furniture made of metal or any metal part which will be assembled with other metal, wood, fabric, plastic or glass parts to form a furniture piece. There are no known sources of this type in Imperial County 1101 - New Source Performance

Standards

(NSPS) 9/14/1999 No Sources

VOC Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources

– Volume IV: Surface Coating of Insulation of Magnet Wire (PDF 44 pp, 1.1MB) EPA-450/2-77- 033 1977/12 VOC emissions from wire coating ovens. Magnet wire coating to electrical insulating varnish or enamel to aluminum or copper wire for use in electrical machinery. There are no known sources of this type in Imperial County No current Rule No Sources

VOC Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources

– Volume V: Surface Coating of Large Appliances (PDF 70 pp, 2.1MB) EPA-450/2-77-034 1977/12 Applies to large appliance industry. VOC emissions from coating of these large appliances. Coatings are typically, epoxy, expoyacrylic, acrylic or polyester enamels. There are no known sources of this type in Imperial County 1101 - New Source Performance

Standards

(NSPS) 9/14/1999 No Sources

VOC Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources

– Volume VI: Surface Coating of Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products (PDF 82 pp, 2.6MB) EPA-450/2-78-015 1978/06 This document deals with the surface coating of miscellaneous metal parts and products, and is intended to provide guidance on VOC emission control for job shop and original equipment manufacturing (OEM) industries which apply coatings on metal substrates. There are no known sources of this type in Imperial County No current Rule No Sources POLLUTANT REFERENCED DOCUMENT APPLICABILITY

# TABLE 2 - CTG/ACT Listing with no applicable sources

FNAL RACT SIP ADOPTED JULY 13, 2010 ICAPCD DATE LAST APPLIED RULE ADOPTED AMENDED SOURCES POLLUTANT REFERENCED DOCUMENT APPLICABILITY

VOC Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources – Volume VII: Factory Surface Coating of Flat Wood Paneling (PDF 66 pp, 2.0MB) EPA450/2-78-032 1978/06 It deals with the surface coating of metal furniture. "Metal furniture" includes any furniture made of metal of any metal part which will be assembled with other metal, wood, fabric, plastic or glass parts to form a furniture piece. There are no known sources of this type in Imperial County 1101 - New Source Performance

Standards

(NSPS) 9/14/1999 No Sources

VOC Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment (PDF 78 pp, 6.0MB) EPA-450/2-78-036 1978/06 This document addresses the control of volatile organic compounds (VOC) from equipment leaks in petroleum refineries

. Equipment considered includes pump seals, compressor seals, seal oil degassing vents, pipeline valves, flanges and other connections There are no known sources of this type in Imperial County 1101 - New Source Performance

Standards

(NSPS) 9/14/1999 No Sources

VOC Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Manufacture of Synthesized Pharmaceutical Products (PDF 134 pp, 3.8MB) EPA450/2-78-029 1978/12 This report deals with volatile organic emissions from the production of synthesized pharmaceutical products. The pharmaceutical industry uses many volatile organic compounds either as raw materials or as solvents. There are no known sources of this type in Imperial County No current Rule No Sources

VOC Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Manufacture of Pneumatic Rubber Tires (PDF 72 pp, 1.6MB) EPA-450/2-78-030 1978/12 This document is concerned with emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOC) from rubber tire manufacturing plants and applicable air pollution control technology. Tire manufacture includes passenger car, light and medium duty truck tires There are no known sources of this type in Imperial County 1101 - New Source Performance

Standards

(NSPS) 9/14/1999 No Sources

VOC Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources

– Volume VIII: Graphic ArtsRotogravure and Flexography (PDF 64 pp, 1.9MB) EPA-450/2-78-033 1978/12 The report deals with VOC emissions from the graphic arts operations which utilize inks containing volatile organic solvents. This guideline is applicable to both the flexogrphic and totogravure processes as applied to both publication and packaging printing. It does not apply to offset Lithography or letterpress printing. There are no known sources of this type in Imperial County 1101 - New Source Performance

Standards

(NSPS) 9/14/1999 No Sources

# TABLE 2 - CTG/ACT Listing with no applicable sources

FNAL RACT SIP ADOPTED JULY 13, 2010 ICAPCD DATE LAST APPLIED RULE ADOPTED AMENDED SOURCES POLLUTANT REFERENCED DOCUMENT APPLICABILITY

VOC Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Large Petroleum Dry Cleaners (PDF 174 pp, 5.0MB) EPA-450/3-82-009 1982/09 Identifies petroleum dry cleaners as offered by industrial and commercial operations only. It is described as a service industry involved in cleaning and/or renting of articles ranging from personal clothing to mops and mats. The model plants were based on 15.5 to 45 kg VOC per 100 kg of clothes cleaned. Typically, dry cleaning plants are classified by their throughputs, which are reflected in the type and size of equipment present. There are no known industrial size sources of this magnitude in Imperial County. 1101 - New Source Performance

Standards

(NSPS) 9/14/1999 No Sources

VOC Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Manufacture of High-Density Polyethylene, Polypropylene, and Polystyrene Resins (PDF 308 pp, 14.0MB) EPA-450/3-83-008 1983/11 The manufacturing process of high-density polyethylene, polypropylene and polyetyrene. Raw material storage and preparation. The polymerization reaction and material recovery. Product finishing and storage. Fabrication, blending or formation of resin materials. There are no known sources in Imperial County No current Rule No Sources

VOC Control of Volatile Organic Compound Equipment Leaks from Natural Gas/Gasoline Processing Plants (PDF 194 pp, 6.3MB) EPA450/3-83-007 1983/12 This document applies to natural gas/gasoline processing plants. The gas may be compressed at field stations for the purpose of transporting to

a treatment or processing facility. There are no known sources in Imperial County 1101 - New Source Performance

Standards

(NSPS) 9/14/1999 No Sources

VOC Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Synthetic Organic Chemical Polymer and Resin Manufacturing Equipment (PDF 148 pp, 6.2MB) EPA-450/3-83- 006 1984/03 This document applies to equipment in process units operated to produce one or more of the synthetic organic chemicals listed in Appendix E of the proposed standards of performance for SOCMI and polymer manufacturing industries. There are no known sources of this type in Imperial County 1101 - New Source Performance

Standards

(NSPS) 9/14/1999 No Sources

VOC Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Air Oxidation Processes in Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry (PDF 259 pp, 9.4MB) EPA450/3-84-015 1984/12 This document describes the air oxidation industry structure, its processes and the associated emissions. Includes Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industries as well as those industries which combine ammonia and air or halogens and air. There are no known sources of this type in Imperial County 1101 - New Source Performance

Standards

(NSPS) 9/14/1999 No Sources

# TABLE 2 - CTG/ACT Listing with no applicable sources

FNAL RACT SIP ADOPTED JULY 13, 2010 ICAPCD DATE LAST APPLIED RULE ADOPTED AMENDED SOURCES POLLUTANT REFERENCED DOCUMENT APPLICABILITY

VOC Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Reactor Processes and Distillation Operations in Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry (PDF 277 pp, 8.7MB) EPA-450/4-91- 031 1993/08 RACT for the control of Volatile Organic Compound emissions from two types of process vents occurring at plants in the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry: Reactors (other than those involving air oxidation processes) and distillation. There are no known sources of this type in Imperial County 1101 - New Source Performance

Standards

(NSPS) Subpart NNN, Subpart RRR 9/14/1999 No Sources

VOC Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Wood Furniture Manufacturing Operations (PDF 288 pp, 13.8MB) EPA-453/R96-007 1996/04 This document identifies the Wood Furniture Industry and those products manufactured of wood and wood products. The document identifies the low-, medium-, and high-end furniture designations. In addition, the finishing process and the application techniques. Note

– Wood Furniture (CTG-MACT) – Draft MACT out 5-1994; Final CTG issued 4-1996. See also 61 FR-25223, May 20, 1996 and 61 FR-50823, September 27, 1996. There are no known sources of this type in Imperial County No current Rule No Sources

VOC Control Techniques Guidelines for Shipbuilding and Ship Repair Operations (Surface Coating) (PDF 30 pp, 4.0MB) 61 FR-44050 8/27/96 1996/08 This document identifies the Control Technologies for the control of Volatile Organic Control (VOC) emissions from surface coating operations in the shipbuilding and ship repair industry. Note

– See also EPA-453/R-94-032. There are no known sources of this type in Imperial County No current Rule No Sources

VOC Aerospace MACT (PDF 37 pp, 5.6MB) 59 FR-29216 6/06/94 1994/06 This limits the emissions of hazardous air pollutants (HAP) from new and existing commercial, civil and military aerospace original equipment manufacturing (OEM) and rework facilities that are major sources of HAP emissions. Note

– See also EPA-453/R-97-004. There are no known sources of this type in Imperial County Rule 425 Aerospace

Coating Operations 8/5/1989 2/23/2010 No Sources

# TABLE 2 - CTG/ACT Listing with no applicable sources

FNAL RACT SIP ADOPTED JULY 13, 2010 ICAPCD DATE LAST APPLIED RULE ADOPTED AMENDED SOURCES POLLUTANT REFERENCED DOCUMENT APPLICABILITY

VOC Aerospace (CTG & MACT) (PDF 62 pp, 288KB) EPA-453/R-97-004 1997/12 This documents explains the Control Techniques for the control of VOC emissions from coatings and solvents used in the aerospace industry.

- Supersedes any potential applicability of the Miscellaneous Metal Part and Products requirements for manufacturing Note

– See also 59 FR-29216, June 6, 1994. There are no known sources of this type in Imperial County Rule 425 Aerospace

Coating Operations 8/5/1989 2/23/2010 No Sources

VOC Control Techniques Guidelines for Offset Lithographic Printing and Letterpress Printing (PDF 52 pp, 349KB) EPA-453/R-06-002 2006/09 This document provides control recommendations for reducing VOC emissions stemming from the use of fountain solutions, cleaning materials and inks in offset lithographic printing and cleaning materials and inks in letterpress printing. The threshold trigger for regulation according to the CTG is when Offset Lithographic Printing and Letterpress Printing operations emit at least 6.8 kg/day (15 lb/day) of actual emissions. There are no known sources equalling or meeting the CTG threshold in Imperial County 1101 - New Source Performance

Standards

(NSPS) 9/14/1999 No Sources a

VOC Control Techniques Guidelines for Flexible Package Printing (PDF 33 pp, 216KB) EPA-453/R-06-003 2006/09 This Control Technology Guideline recommends the reduction of VOC emissions from inks, coatings, adhesives and cleaning materials used in flexible packaging printing. The threshold trigger for regulation according to the CTG is when flexible packaging printing operations emit at least 6.8 kg/day (15 lb/day) of actual emissions. There are no known sources of this type in Imperial County No current Rule No Sources

VOC Control Techniques Guidelines for Flat Wood Paneling Coatings (PDF 27 pp, 212KB) EPA-453/R-06-004 2006/09 The control of VOC emissions from surface coating operations that include flat wood paneling. Applies to facilities that apply flat wood paneling coatings that emit at least 6.8 kg/day of VOC before consideration of controls. There are no known sources of this type in Imperial County No current Rule No Sources

# TABLE 2 - CTG/ACT Listing with no applicable sources

FNAL RACT SIP ADOPTED JULY 13, 2010 ICAPCD DATE LAST APPLIED RULE ADOPTED AMENDED SOURCES POLLUTANT REFERENCED DOCUMENT APPLICABILITY

VOC Control Techniques Guidelines for Paper, Film, and Foil Coatings (PDF 102 pp, 488KB) EPA 453/R-07-003 2007/09 This document recommends techniques for the control of VOC emissions stemming from the use of coatings in paper, film and foil surface coating operations. These controls apply to facilities with

a total actual VOC emissions from all paper, film and foil There are no known sources of this type in Imperial County No current Rule No Sources

VOC Control Techniques Guidelines for Large Appliance Coatings (PDF 44 pp, 374KB) EPA 453/R-07-004 2007/09 This document recommends techniques for the control of VOC emissions stemming from the use of coatings in large appliance coating operations. Coatings include paints, sealants, caulks, inks, adhesives and maskants. There are no known sources of this type in Imperial County 1101 - New Source Performance

Standards

(NSPS) 9/14/1999 No Sources

VOC Control Techniques Guidelines for Metal Furniture Coatings (PDF 100 pp, 293KB) EPA 453/R-07-005 2007/09 This document recommends techniques for the control of VOC emissions stemming from the use of coatings in metal furniture surface coating operations. Coatings include paints, sealants, caulks, inks, adhesives and maskants. There are no known sources of this type in Imperial County 1101 - New Source Performance

Standards

(NSPS) 9/14/1999 No Sources

VOC Control Techniques Guidelines for Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic Parts Coatings EPA 453/R-08-003 2008/09 This CTG provides control recommendations for reducing VOC emissions from the use of coatings in miscellaneous metal products and miscellaneous plastic parts surface coating operations. The CTG applies to manufacturers of miscellaneous metal and plastic parts that surface-coat the parts they produce. An example of product type are fabricated metal products, molded platic parts, small and large farm machinery, pleasure craft, laboratory and medical equipment etc. No current Rule No Sources

VOC Control Techniques Guidelines for Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Materials EPA 453/R-08-004 This CTG provides control rcommendations for reducing VOC emissions from the use of gel coats, resins, and materials used to clean application equipment in fiberglass boat manufacturing operations No current Rule No Sources

# TABLE 2 - CTG/ACT Listing with no applicable sources

FNAL RACT SIP ADOPTED JULY 13, 2010 ICAPCD DATE LAST APPLIED RULE ADOPTED AMENDED SOURCES POLLUTANT REFERENCED DOCUMENT APPLICABILITY

VOC Control Techniques Guidelines for Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives EPA 453/R-08-005 This CTG provides control recommendations for reducing VOC emissions from miscellaneous industrial adhesives and adhesive primer application processes. The miscellaneous industrial adhesives product category does notinclude adhesives that are addressed by CTG's already issued for categories listed under CAA Section 183(e) or by earlier CTG's No current Rule No Sources

VOC Control Techniques Guidelines for Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Assembly Coatings EPA 453/R-08- 006 This CTG provides cotnrol recommendations fro reducing VOC emissions stemming from the use of coatings in automobile and light-duty truck assembly coating operations. All automobile and light-duty truck surface coating facilities within an ozone non-attainment area are considered as emitting above the set threshold of 6.8 Kg/day (15 lb/day) of VOC or more. No current Rule No Sources

a The Air District examined potential sources and did not find any of these entities falling within the RACT recommendations for the identified CTG.

# TABLE 3 - MAJOR SOURCES IN IMPERIAL COUNTY

FINAL RACT SIP ADOPTED JULY 13, 2010 PERMIT NUMBER 109 110 207* 400 400.1 400.2 403 413 414 415 416 417 425 426 427 1022 NOx Imperial Irrigation District (Rockwood) 1365 √ √ √ √ √ √

NOx Holly Sugar 1697 √ √ √ √ √ NOx Imperial Valley Resource Recovery 1929 √ √ √ √ √ √ √

NOx Imperial Irrigation District (ECGS) 2152 √ √ √ √ √ √

NOx USG 2834 √ √ √ √ VOC ORMAT Nevada, Inc 1641 √ √ VOC CalEnergy 1894 √ VOC GEM Resources (ORMESA,LLC) 2002 √ √

VOC SFPP, L.P. 2046 √ √ √ √ √ √ POLLUTANT FACILITY Evaluated Rules which apply to Major Source facilities in Imperial County

* Rule 207, New and Modified Stationary Source Review was submitted to EPA for review on 05/26/2000, to date EPA has not acted on the Rule

# TABLE 4 - District Rules Evaluated for RACT SIP

FINAL RACT SIP ADOPTED JULY 13, 2010 Rule Original Date Last FR Publication Federal Register Number CTG/ACT? Adoption Date Amended Date Rule Approval

100 Rule Citation NO 9/14/1999 10/10/2001 66 FR 51578 101 Definitions NO 1/11/2005 10/10/2006 11/15/2007 72 FR 64156 CARB REVIEW PENDING SUBMITTAL TO EPA 2/23/2010 102 Public Records NO 11/19/1985 2/3/1989 54 FR 5448 103 Inspection of Public Records NO Prior to 11/04/1977 9/14/1999 8/11/1978 43 FR 35694

104 Administrative Penalties NO Prior to 11/04/1977 9/14/1999

106 Abatement NO Prior to 11/04/1977 9/14/1999

107 Land Use NO Prior to 1/04/1977 9/14/1999 8/11/1978 43 FR 35694

109 Source Sampling NO Prior to 11/04/1977 9/14/1999 8/10/2001 66 FR 42126

110 Stack Monitoring NO 11/19/1985 9/14/1999 8/10/2001 66 FR 42126 112 Notice to Comply NO 4/4/2000 113 Circumvention NO 11/19/1985 9/14/1999 10/10/2001 66 FR 51578 114 Severability Clause NO Prior to 11/04/1977 9/14/1999 8/11/1978 43 FR 35694

115 Legal Application and Incorporation of Other Regulations NO 11/19/1985 9/14/1999 3/21/2003 68 FR 13846 116 Emissions Statement and Certification NO 2/23/2010

201 Permits Required NO Prior to 10/15/1979 10/10/2006 1/3/2007 72 FR 9

202 Exemptions (Use to be 402) NO Prior to 11/19/1985 10/10/2006 2/3/1989 54 FR 5448

203 Transfer NO 11/19/1985 9/14/1999 1/3/2007 72 FR 9 204 Applications NO 11/19/1985 9/14/1999 205 Cancellation of Applications NO 11/19/1985 9/14/1999 1/3/2007 72 FR 9 206 Processing of Applications NO 2/21/1972 10/10/2006 1/3/2007 72 FR 9
207 b New & Modified Stationary Source Review NO Prior to 03/17/1980 9/14/1999 10/12/1983 Proposed Conditional App By EPA 207-1 Federal Major Modification NO 10/10/2006

208 Permit to Operate NO 11/19/1985 9/14/1999 1/3/2007 72 FR 9 209 Implementation Plans NO 11/19/1985 9/14/1999 11/10/1980 45 FR 74480 210 Denial of Application NO 3/17/1980 9/14/1999 211 Appeals NO Prior to 02/21/1972 9/14/1999 Title Regulation 1 - General Provisions

Regulation 2 - Permits Under review by CARB pending submittal to EPA

# TABLE 4 - District Rules Evaluated for RACT SIP

FINAL RACT SIP ADOPTED JULY 13, 2010 Rule Original Date Last FR Publication Federal Register Number CTG/ACT? Adoption Date Amended Date Rule Approval Title

212 Annual Renewal NO 11/19/1985 9/14/1999 213 Temporary Permit To Operate NO 9/14/1999 214 Emission Reduction Credit Banking NO 9/7/1993 10/10/2006 214-1 Mobile Source Emission Reduction Credit Banking NO 10/10/2006

215 Community Bank & Priority Reserve NO 9/7/1993 9/14/1999 216 Construction or Reconstruction of Major Stationary Sources that Emit Hazardous Air Pollutants NO 6/23/1998

217 Large Confined Animal Facilities Permits Required NO 10/10/2006

400 Fuel Burning Equipment YES 11/19/1985 9/14/1999 3/24/2003 68 FR 14161 400.1 Stationary Gas Turbine(s) - Reasonably Available Control Technology YES

400.2 Boilers, Process heaters and Steam Generators YES

401 Opacity of Emissions NO 11/19/1985 9/14/1999 2/2/1989 54 FR 5448 403 General Limitations on the Discharge of Air Contaminants YES 11/19/1985 5/18/2004 11/16/2004 69 FR 67058 405 Sulfur Compounds Emissions Standards, Limitations and Prohibitions NO 9/14/1999 5/18/2004 11/16/2004 69 FR 67058

407 Nuisances NO 5/31/1972 37 FR 10842 408 Frost Protection & Orchard Heaters NO 11/9/1982 9/14/1999 7/11/2001 66 FR 36170 409 Incinerators NO 11/9/1982 9/14/1999 7/11/2001 66 FR 36170 412 Soil Decontamination Operations NO 1/16/2001 11/5/2002 67 FR 67313 413 Organic Solvent Cleaning YES 1/16/2001 11/5/2002 67 FR 67313 414 Storage of Organic Liquids at Terminals & Bulk Loading Facilities YES 12/11/1979 5/18/2004 11/24/2008 73 FR 70883

415 Transfer and Storage of Gasoline YES 9/14/1999 5/18/2004 2/22/2005 70 FR 8520 416 Oil Effluent Water Separator YES 12/11/1979 9/14/1999 7/26/2001 66 FR 38939 417 Organic Solvents YES Prior to 11/04/1977 9/14/1999 11/5/2002 67 FR 67313

418 Disposal & Evaporation of Solvents NO 6/6/1972 9/14/1999 1/27/1981 46 FR 8472 419 Reduction of Animal Matter NO 11/4/1977 9/14/1999 1/27/1981 46 FR 8472 420 Beef Feedlots formerly Livestock Feed Yards NO 11/19/1985 10/10/2006 2/26/2003 68 FR 8839 421 Open Burning NO 11/19/1985 9/14/1999 7/11/2001 66 FR 36170 424 Architectural Coatings NO 11/9/1982 2/23/2010 1/4/2007 72 FR 267 CARB REVIEW PENDING SUBMITTAL TO EPA 425 Aerospace Coating Operations a YES 9/14/1999 2/23/2010 5/19/2005 70 FR 28826 CARB REVIEW PENDING SUBMITTAL TO EPA 426 Cutback Asphalt and Emulsified Paving Materials YES 9/14/1999 4/19/2001 66 FR 20084 427 Automotive Refinishing Operations YES 9/14/1999 2/23/2010 10/3/2001 66 FR50319 CARB REVIEW PENDING SUBMITTAL TO EPA CARB review pending EPA submittal

CARB review pending EPA submittal Regulation 4 - Prohibitions

# TABLE 4 - District Rules Evaluated for RACT SIP

FINAL RACT SIP ADOPTED JULY 13, 2010 Rule Original Date Last FR Publication Federal Register Number CTG/ACT? Adoption Date Amended Date Rule Approval Title

601 General NO Prior to 10/15/1979 1/27/1981 46 FR 8472

602 Episode Criteria Levels NO Prior to 10/15/1979 1/27/1981 46 FR 8472

603 Episode Stages NO Prior to 10/15/1979 1/27/1981 46 FR 8472

604 Division of Responsibility for Abatement Action NO Prior to 10/15/1979 1/27/1981 46 FR 8472

605 Administration of Emergency NO Prior to 10/15/1979 1/27/1981 46 FR 8472

606 Advisory of High Air Pollution NO Prior to 10/15/1979 1/27/1981 46 FR 8472

607 Declaration of Episode NO Prior to 10/15/1979 1/27/1981 46 FR 8472

608 Episode Action State 1 (Health Advisory - Alert) NO Prior to 10/15/1979 1/27/1981 46 FR 8472

609 Episode Action Stage 2 (Warning) NO Prior to 10/15/1979 1/27/1981 46 FR 8472

610 Episode Action Stage 3 NO Prior to 10/15/1979 1/27/1981 46 FR 8472

611 Episode Termination NO Prior to 10/15/1979 1/27/1981 46 FR 8472

612 Stationary Source Curtailment NO Prior to 10/15/1979 1/27/1981 46 FR 8472

613 Episode Abatement Plan NO Prior to 10/15/1979 1/27/1981 46 FR 8472

614 Enforcement NO Prior to 10/15/1979 1/27/1981 46 FR 8472

701 Agricultural Burning NO Prior to 10/15/1979 9/14/1999 1/31/2003 68 FR 4929

702 Range Improvement Burning NO Prior to 10/15/1979 9/14/1999 7/11/2001 66 FR 36170

800 Fugitive Dust Requirements for Control of Fine Particulate Matter (PM-10) NO 10/10/1994 11/8/2005

801 Construction and Earthmoving Activities NO 11/8/2005 802 Bulk Materials NO 11/8/2005 803 Carry-Out and Track-Out NO 11/8/2005 Regulation 6 - Emergency Regulations

Regulation 7 - Agricultural Burning

Regulation 8 - Fugitive Dust Emissions

# TABLE 4 - District Rules Evaluated for RACT SIP

FINAL RACT SIP ADOPTED JULY 13, 2010 Rule Original Date Last FR Publication Federal Register Number CTG/ACT? Adoption Date Amended Date Rule Approval Title

804 Open Areas NO 11/8/2005 805 Paved and Unpaved Roads NO 11/8/2005 806 Conservation Management Practices NO 11/8/2005

900 Procedures for Issuing Permits to Operate for Sources Subject to Title V of the Federal Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 NO 12/14/1993 6/26/2001

901 Acid Deposition Control NO 3/21/1995 902 Request for Synthetic Minor Source Status NO 8/22/1995 903 Potential to Emit NO 8/22/1995 910 Enhanced Monitoring NO 3/21/1995 925 Conformity NO 11/29/1994 4/23/1999 64 FR 19916 926 Transportation Conformity NO 12/13/1994

1001 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS) NO 9/14/1999

1002 California AirBorne Toxic Control Measures NO 9/14/1999 11/8/2005 1003 Hexavalent Chromium Emissions from Cooling Towers NO 8/30/1994 9/14/1999 1022 Perchloroethylene AirBorne Toxic Control Measure - Dry Cleaning Operations YES 3/21/1995

1101 New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) NO 9/14/1999

a No sources in operation in Imperial County

b Revision submitted to EPA pending Action by EPA Regulation 9

Regulation 10

Regulation 11

# TABLE 5 - RACT SIP SUMMARY

FINAL RACT SIP ADOPTED JULY 13, 2010 DISTRICT IMPERIAL COUNTY MOJAVE DESERT VENTURA SAN JOAQUIN SOUTH COAST RULE NUMBER 400 474 No General NOx Rule 4301 474

TITLE Fuel Burning Equipment Fuel Burning Equipment Fuel Burning Equipment Fuel Burning Equipment - Oxides of Nitrogen ADOPTED 2/21/1972 5/7/1976 5/21/1992 5/7/1976 LAST AMENDED Sep 14, 1999 Aug 25, 1997 Dec 17, 1992 Dec 04, 1981

EMISSIONS LIMITS 140 lbs/hr Nitrogen Oxides (NO 2 ) 125 ppm by volume (ppmv) when operated on gaseous fuel; 225 ppmv when operated on liquid and/or solid fuels Combustion point of discharge, 0.1 grain per cubic foot of gas calculated to 12% of carbon dioxide at dry standard conditions. 200lbs/hr of sulfur compounds (SO 2) ; 140 lbs/hr of nitrogen oxides (NO 2 ); Ten (10) lbs/hr of combustion contaminants as defined in Rule 1020 (Definitions) 3% oxygen on a dry basis averaged over a minimum of 15 consecutive minutes: Ranges GAS: 300 ppm to 125 ppm and LIQUID or SOLID: 400 ppm to 225 ppm based on level of Kilogram Thermal Calories of 140 to ±540 or British Thermal Units of 555 to ±2143. Steam (NO2) calculated at 3% oxygen on a dry basis averaged over a minimum of 15 minutes: GAS 125 ppm LIQUID or SOLID 225 ppm based on Kilogram Calories of 140 or more and British Termal Units of 555 or more. RULE APPROVAL BY EPA 05/31/1972 01/11/1999 05/18/1999 07/06/1982

FEDERAL REGISTER 37 FR 10842 64 FR 1517 64 FR 26876 47 FR 29231

# TABLE 5 - RACT SIP SUMMARY

FINAL RACT SIP ADOPTED JULY 13, 2010 DISTRICT IMPERIAL COUNTY MOJAVE DESERT VENTURA SAN JOAQUIN SOUTH COAST 1134 1135 Emission of Oxides of Nitrogen from Stationary Gas Turbines Emissions of Oxides of Nitrogen from Electric

Power Generating Systems ADOPTED 2/23/2010 2/22/1995 3/14/1995 8/18/1994 *8/4/1989 Aug 08, 1997 Jul 19, 1991 EMISSIONS LIMITS Applies to new or existing Stationary Gas Turbines of 1 megawatt (MW) and/or larger -NOx limits on any new or existing Stationary Gas Turbine(s) - 42 ppmv when operated on a gaseous fuel. 65 ppmv when operated on a liquid fuel except when operating less than 400 hours per calendar year or during startup, shutdown or a change in load Applies to new or existing non-utility, commercial, industrial or institutional Stationary Gas Turbine of 0.3 MW and larger - Units operating > 877 hrs/yr with ratings > 10 MW NOx Limits are 5ppmv for gas fuel, 25ppmv for liquid fuel. Units 2-10MW range between 25- 35ppmv for gas fuel and 65ppmv for liquid fuel. Applies to all stationary gas turbines rated 0.3 MW or greater - 0.3 and less 42 ppmv for gaseous fuel and 65ppmv for liquid. Greater than 0.3 but <10.0 25x E/25ppmv for gaseous fuel and 65ppmv for liquid. Applies to all stationary gas turbines with ratings of 0.3 MW or greater - Tier 1 Limits 4MW and > operating <877 hrs/yr and units Units >.3 <10 operating ≥877 hrs/yr 42ppmv for gas and 65 ppmv for oil. Units 10MW and > operating ≥877 hrs/yr range 15xEFF/25 & 9xEFF/25 for gas and 42xEFF/25 & 25xEFF/25 for liquid. Applies to all existing stationary gas turbines 0.3 MW and > - Units < 2.9MW to over 10MW range in limits from 9ppm to 25ppm. For Rule 1135 District wide Daily limits set for Southern California Edison, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, City of Burbank, Glendale and Pasadena RULE NUMBER 400.1 1159 74.23 4703

TITLE Stationary Gas Turbine(s) - Reasonably Available

Control Technology (RACT) Stationary Gas Turbines Stationary Gas Turbines Stationary Gas Turbines

LAST AMENDED Sep 28, 2009 Jan 08, 2002 Sep 20, 2007

# TABLE 5 - RACT SIP SUMMARY

FINAL RACT SIP ADOPTED JULY 13, 2010 DISTRICT IMPERIAL COUNTY MOJAVE DESERT VENTURA SAN JOAQUIN SOUTH COAST 1134 1135 RULE NUMBER 400.1 1159 74.23 4703

Units <2MW 42ppmv for gas fuel and 50ppmv for liquid fuel. Units operating < 877 hrs/yr and >10 MW 25ppmv for gas fuel and 42ppmv for liquid fuel. - Specific limits apply for specific model turbines belonging to the Southern California Gas Company Units 10.0 and greater range between 9xE/25 to 15xE/25ppm for gaseous fuel and 25xE/25 to 42xE/25ppm for liquid. Units operating <877 hrs/yr rated at 4.0 and up 42ppmv for gaseous fuel and 65 for liquid fuel. Where E= unit efficiency. Specific unit limits 18xEFF/25 & 50 for gas and 42xEFF/25 & 50 for liquid. Tier 2 Specificmodel and systemsstandard and enhanced limits range between 3ppmvd to 50ppmvd for gas fueland 25ppmvd to 65ppmvd for liquid. Tier 3 operating < or >877 hrs/yr from < 3MW to >10MW limits range from 5ppmvd to 25ppmvd for gas fuel and 25ppmvd to 42ppmvd for liquid fuel. 08/01/2000

08/11/1998

65 FR 46876 63 FR 42721 FEDERAL REGISTER 61 FR 15719 68 FR 33018 74 FR 53888

* Both referenced rules have the same adoption date RULE APPROVAL BY EPA PENDING 2/22/1995 version approved on 04/09/1996 06/23/2003 10/21/2009

# TABLE 5 - RACT SIP SUMMARY

FINAL RACT SIP ADOPTED JULY 13, 2010 DISTRICT IMPERIAL COUNTY MOJAVE DESERT VENTURA SAN JOAQUIN SAN JOAQUIN 74.15 4351 4352 74.15.1 4305 Boilers, Steam Generators and Process Heaters - Phase I Solid Fuel Fired Boilers, Steam Generators and Process heaters

Boilers, Steam Generators, and Process Heaters - Phase 2

3/28/1989 10/20/1994 5/11/1993 12/16/1993 Nov 08, 1994 Jun 13, 2000 EMISSIONS LIMITS Applies to new or existing Process Heaters, Boilers or Steam Generators heat input rating of 5 million Btu per hour - NOx limits 30ppmv or 0.036lbs/million Btu on gaseous fuel; 40ppmv or0.052lbs/million Btu on liquid fuels - combined gas and liquid heat-input weighted average of the limits. -ppmv limits at dry stackgas conditions and 30% volume stack-gas oxygen hrly average. Applies to new and existing boilers, steam generators, and process heaters rated heat ≥ 5 million Btu/hr - RACT standards, NOx in excess of 70ppmv and/or 0.084lbs/MMBtu of heat input gaseous fuel, NOx in excess of 115ppmv and/or 0.150lbs/MMBtu of heat input liquid or solid fuels, NOx in excess heat input weighted average of the limits in combined gas and liquid and/or solid fuels. Applies to boilers, steam generators and process heaters ≥ 5 million Btu/hr annual heat input rate ≥ 9x10 9 Btu's per calendar year - NOx 40ppmv. ≥ 5 million Btu/hr annual heat input rate less 9x10 9 Btu's/calendar year operational requirements. Rule 74.15.1 applies to ≥ 1 million Btu/hr and < 5 million Btu/hr.- Annual heat input
rate ≥ 1.8x10 9 BTU, Applies to boiler, steam generator or process heater rated heat input > 5 million Btu/hr (Major NOx source) - less then 9 million Btu/yr operating requirements. Units> 9 million Btu/yr gas fuel 95ppmv, natural & induced 147ppmv; Distillate Oil 115ppmv,natural & Induced 155ppmv; Residual Oil 165ppmc,natural & Induced 194ppmv; Crude oil 165ppmv, natural & Induced 194ppmv. SOLID FUEL - Municipal Solid Waste, Biomass (Hearth Furnace) and all others Tier I NOx limits 200ppmv, .35 lb/MMBtu and .20 lb/MMBtu. Tier 2 NOx limits 200ppmv, 115ppmv and 115ppmv respectively. 9/14/1994

May 18, 2006 *Boilers, Steam Generators and Process Heaters RULE NUMBER 400.2 1157

2/23/2010 ADOPTED 10/26/1994 TITLE Boilers, Process heaters and Steam Generators Boilers and Process Heaters

LAST AMENDED May 19, 1997 * Aug 21, 2003

# TABLE 5 - RACT SIP SUMMARY

FINAL RACT SIP ADOPTED JULY 13, 2010 DISTRICT IMPERIAL COUNTY MOJAVE DESERT VENTURA SAN JOAQUIN SAN JOAQUIN 74.15 4351 4352 74.15.1 4305 RULE NUMBER 400.2 1157

≤ 30% annual capacity fact 70ppmv gas and liquid fuel. Biomass - exhaust 120ppmv corrected to 12% 3 hr average. NOx reduced 80% uncontrolled exhaust gas steam. emissions excess 30ppmv and/or annual heat input rate ≥0.3x10 9 BTU Phase 2- Gas fuel 30ppmv, box or cabin 147ppmv; Liquid fuel 40ppmv, box or cabin 155ppmv. Combined fuels NOx limit heat input weighted average of limits. Phase 3 - not analyzed as it pertains to refineries

02/09/1996

10/10/2001 61 FR 4887 66 FR 51576

* Referenced rules either have the same title or date FEDERAL REGISTER 05/30/2007

72 FR 29886 64 FR 19277 69 FR 28061 RULE APPROVAL BY EPA PENDING 04/20/1999 05/18/2004

# TABLE 5 - RACT SIP SUMMARY

FINAL RACT SIP ADOPTED JULY 13, 2010 DISTRICT

EMISSIONS LIMITS RULE NUMBER

ADOPTED TITLE

LAST AMENDED SOUTH COAST 1146 1146.1 Emissions of Oxides of Nitrogen From Industrial, Institutional, and Commercial Boilers, Steam Generators, and Process Heaters Emissions of Oxides of Nitrogen From Small Industrial, Institutional, and Commercial Boilers, Steam Generators, and Process Heaters 9/6/1988 10/5/1990

Applies to units ≥5 million Btu/hr - NOx limits All units gaseous fuel 30ppm, non-gaseous fuels 40ppm, Landfill gas 25ppm, Digester gas 15ppm, Atmospheric units 12ppm: Group I - 5 ppm, Group II and III 9ppm. Enhanced limited are 5ppm. Rule 1146.1 - NOx limits any units landfill gas 25ppm, and Digester gas 15ppm, Atmospheric units 12ppm. Natural gas 9ppm ** Sep 05, 2008

# TABLE 5 - RACT SIP SUMMARY

FINAL RACT SIP ADOPTED JULY 13, 2010 DISTRICT RULE NUMBER

FEDERAL REGISTER RULE APPROVAL BY EPA SOUTH COAST 1146 1146.1

11/17/2000 Version approved on 04/08/2002 05/13/1994 version approved on 04/06/1995 67 FR 16640 60 FR 46220

# TABLE 5 - RACT SIP SUMMARY

FINAL RACT SIP ADOPTED JULY 13, 2010 DISTRICT IMPERIAL COUNTY MOJAVE DESERT VENTURA SAN JOAQUIN SOUTH COAST 1122 1171 Organic Solvent Organic Solvent Surface Cleaning and Organic Solvent Solvent Degreasers Degreasing Operations Degreasing Operations Degreasing Degreasing Operations Solvent Cleaning Operations

3/2/1979 8/2/1991 LAST AMENDED Nov 11, 2003 Sep 20, 2007 Oct 01, 2004

EMISSIONS LIMITS Design, Control and safety switch requirements: Freeboard height shall provide Freeboard Ratio greater than or equal to 0.75 High Volatility Solvents use of water cover and overall capture and control of 85% Manufacturer recommendations. No leaks, stored in closed containers, containers must be labeled, disposal according to reclamation service or licensed facility or recycle. Solvent Cleaning: Maximum limits: ROC composite Partial Pressure 33 mm Hg@20oC and ROC content 900 grams per liter all other solvent cleaning 25 grams per liter. Cold Cleaner s has operating requirements Till Sep 20, 2008 use nonhalogenated cleaning material with VOC content of 50grams VOC per liter solvent or less. Sep 20,2008 use nonhalogenated cleaning material with VOC content of 25grams VOC per liter solvent or less. Design, operation and VOC emission control systems with an overall capture and control efficiency of 85% by weight. Cold Cleaners, OpenTop Vapor Degreasers, conveyorized degreasers, air-tight and airless cleaning systems with VOC or NESHAP halogenated solvent. Work practice requirements, Design requirements, Cleaning requriements and NESHAP compliance. For Standards Both Batch-Loaded Cold Cleaners and Conveyorized shall have a VOC content of 25grams/liter or less.| Cleaning activity VOC Limits in grams/liter range from 25 to 800 depending on activity. RULE APPROVAL BY EPA 11/05/2002 01/11/1999 01/08/2002 version approved on

6/4/2002 12/20/01 version approved on 07/22/2002 02/08/2006 06/13/1997 on 08/13/1999. Current

version under review 4662

ADOPTED 1/16/2001 9/28/1994 5/29/1979 4/11/1991 TITLE RULE NUMBER 413 1104 74.6

# TABLE 5 - RACT SIP SUMMARY

FINAL RACT SIP ADOPTED JULY 13, 2010 DISTRICT IMPERIAL COUNTY MOJAVE DESERT VENTURA SAN JOAQUIN SOUTH COAST 1122 1171 4662 RULE NUMBER 413 1104 74.6

FEDERAL REGISTER 67 FR 67313 64 FR 1517 67 FR 38396 67 FR 47701 71 FR 6350 64 FR 44134

# TABLE 5 - RACT SIP SUMMARY

FINAL RACT SIP ADOPTED JULY 13, 2010 DISTRICT IMPERIAL COUNTY MOJAVE DESERT VENTURA SAN JOAQUIN SOUTH COAST RULE NUMBER 414 463 71.2 4623 463

TITLE Storage of Reactive Organic Compound Storage of Organic Liquids Storage of Reactive Organic Compound Storage of Organic Liquids Organic Liquid Storage

ADOPTED 12/11/1979 1/9/1976 6/20/1978 4/11/1991 8/15/1977 LAST AMENDED May 18, 2004 Nov 02, 1992 Sep 26, 1989 May 19, 2005 May 06, 2005

EMISSIONS LIMITS No storage with Tank capacity less than 40,000 gallons with a true vapor pressure equal to or greater than .5 lbs/sq inch absolute (psia) must have a submerged fill pipe or a vapor loss control device. Tank capacity greater than or equal to 40,000 with a tue vapor pressure equal to or greater than 1.5 psia must have a vapor control device. Tank capacity of 10,000 or more but less than 20,000 with a 1.5 psia must have a pressure vacuum relief valve. Tank capacity of 20,000 or more but less than 40,000 with a 1.5 psia must have a vapor loss control device. No storage tank with a true vapor pressure equal to or greate than 11.0 without having a working pressure tank. No storage with Tank capacity 39,630 gallons or less with a true vapor pressue of 77.5 mm Hg (1.5 psia) or greater. Tank capacity more than 39,630 gallons with a true vapor pressure of 77.5 mm Hg (1.5 psia) or greater. No storage with Tank capacity equal to or less than 40,000 gallons with a modified vapor pressure greater than 0.5 lbs/sq inch absolute (psia) must have a submerged fill pipe or vapor loss control devices. Above ground storage tanks equal to or greater than 10,000 gallons and less than 20,000 gallons for crude oil and ROC liquids with a modified Reid Vapor Pressure of 1.5 psia or greatermust have a pressurevacuum relief valve with minimum pressure and vacuum settings of 90% of the maximum, safe d Tank capcity of 1,100 gallons or greater with ranging true vapor pressure variations between 0.5 psia to greater than 11 psia require relief valve, internal, external floating roofs, vapor recovery systems or pressure vessel. All must be maintained leak free. Organic liquid tank capacity 75,000 liter or 19,815 gallons or greater and gasoline between 950 liters (251 gallons) and 75,000 liters (19,815 gallons) Tank roof requirements, external floating roof, internal floating type cover, and vapor recovery system

# TABLE 5 - RACT SIP SUMMARY

FINAL RACT SIP ADOPTED JULY 13, 2010 DISTRICT IMPERIAL COUNTY MOJAVE DESERT VENTURA SAN JOAQUIN SOUTH COAST RULE NUMBER 414 463 71.2 4623 463

RULE APPROVAL BY EPA Version adopted 05/18/2004 approved 11/24/2008 Superseded by rule 461 by EPA 5/13/1995 12/06/1993 09/13/2005 01/04/2007

FEDERAL REGISTER 73 FR 70883 60 FR 21702 58 FR 64157 70 FR 53937 72 FR 267

# TABLE 5 - RACT SIP SUMMARY

FINAL RACT SIP ADOTPED JULY 13, 2010 DISTRICT IMPERIAL COUNTY MOJAVE DESERT VENTURA SAN JOAQUIN SOUTH COAST RULE NUMBER 415 461 70 4621 461

TITLE Transfer and Storage of Gasoline Gasoline Transfer and Dispensing Sorage and Transfer of Gasoline Gasoline Transfer into Stationary Storage Containers, Delivery Vessels, and Bulk Plants Gsoline Transfer and Dispensing

ADOPTED 11/4/1977 1/9/1976 6/25/1974 4/11/1991 1/9/1976 LAST AMENDED May 18, 2004 May 25, 1994 Nov 11, 2003 Dec 20, 2007 Mar 07, 2008

EMISSIONS LIMITS Stationary container capacity of more than 250 gallons must have permanent submerged fill pipe, phase I Vapor Recovery System, vapor return lines are connected between tank truck and stationary storage container, all lines gravity drained, pressure vacuum relief valve, vapor control systems, vapor pressure of 11 psia or greater not allowed. Stationary Storage container with a capacity of more than 251 gallons must comply with Rule 463-Storage of Organic Liquids or have a permanent submerged fill pipe and vapor recovery system with 95% recovery, along with proper connection of all lines, hatch openings limited to no more than 3 minutes, gravity drained lines, above ground tanks equipped with dry breaks, no defects. Storage of gasoline in containers more than 40,000 are regulated by Rule 71.2-Storage of Reactive Organic Compound Liquids. Stationary Storage conatiner with a capacity of more than 250 gallons must have a permanent submerged fill pipe, phase I vapor recovery system preventing 95% displaced vapors, leak free and gravity drained. Storage at bulk plants greater than 250 gallons but less than 19,800 gallons. Others are 250 gallons and greater. Loading and vapor collection equipment must be leak free. Gasoline storage and liading must have ARB certified permanent submerged fill pipe and ARB certified Phase I vapor recoverysystem, ARB pressurevacuum relief valve set at 3.0±0.5 inches and 8.0±2.0 inches water column vacuum relief. Phase I: Stationary capacity 950 liters (251 gallons) or more - Mobile 454 liters (120 gallons): Underground tanks CARB certified enhanced vapor recovery system with efficiency of 98%. Above ground tanks CARB certified vapor recovery system with efficiency of 95%. All fill tubes and dry breaks have vapor tight caps and seals. Gasoline transfer requires Phase II requirements.

# TABLE 5 - RACT SIP SUMMARY

FINAL RACT SIP ADOTPED JULY 13, 2010 DISTRICT IMPERIAL COUNTY MOJAVE DESERT VENTURA SAN JOAQUIN SOUTH COAST RULE NUMBER 415 461 70 4621 461

Storage tanks greater than 250 gallons must have CARBcertified pressurevacuum relief valve. Phase II vapor recovery required when dispensing into motor vehicles preventing 95% displacement of vapors

RULE APPROVAL BY EPA 02/22/2005 05/03/1995 12/06/1993 Approved 06/18/1998 version on 4/19/2000 Approved 06/13/2005 version on 04/11/2006

FEDERAL REGISTER 70 FR 8520 60 FR 21702 58 FR 64157 65 FR 20912 71 FR 18216

# TABLE 5 - RACT SIP SUMMARY

FINAL RACT SIP ADOPTED JULY 13, 2010 DISTRICT IMPERIAL COUNTY MOJAVE DESERT VENTURA SAN JOAQUIN SOUTH COAST RULE NUMBER 416 464 74.8 4625 1176

TITLE Oil Effluent Water Separator Oil-Water Separators Refinery Vacuum Producing Systems, Wastewaster Separators and Process Turnarounds Wastewater Separators VOC Emissions from Wastewater Systems

ADOPTED 12/11/1979 5/7/1976 6/19/1979 4/11/1991 11/3/1989 LAST AMENDED Sep 14, 1999 Aug 25, 1997 Dec 17, 1992 Dec 04, 1981

EMISSIONS LIMITS Recovery of 200 gallons or more petroleum in any one day from equipment with a Reid vapor pressure of 0.5 lbs/sq inch or greater. Vapor recovery system which reduces the emission of all hydrocarbon vapors and gases into the atmosphere by at least 90% by weight Vapor loss control devices required; fixed cover or floating cover with required seals and enclosure of liquid contents. All vapors are routed to a control device with an overall control efficiency of at least 90% by weight of VOC's. All forebays must have a fixed cover such that no liquid surface is exposed to the atmosphere. Requirements for covers and fugitive vapor leak constitutes a violation Use of control equipment such as a firefox, a flare or addition of vapors to refinery fuel gas or feedstocks. Inlet heater or compartment of a wastewater separator must be equipped with a solid cover, a floating cover with specified dimensions. Venting not allowed, uncondensed ROC gases are to the fuel gas system or to a flare. Must use vapor loss control devices: solid cover all openings sealed and totally enclosed, afloating pontoon or doubledeck type cover with closure seals with no holes or tears. The vapor recovery system shall have a control efficiency of at least 90% by weight. All wastewater separator forbays shall be covered. Wastewater systms and closed vent systems shall not emit VOC emissions greater than 500 ppm above background levels according to specific compliance dates. Several Unit, Equipment, Device and Control requirements.

RULE APPROVAL BY EPA 07/26/2001 09/27/1995 04/17/1987 1/2/2008 10/07/2002

# TABLE 5 - RACT SIP SUMMARY

FINAL RACT SIP ADOPTED JULY 13, 2010 DISTRICT IMPERIAL COUNTY MOJAVE DESERT VENTURA SAN JOAQUIN SOUTH COAST RULE NUMBER 416 464 74.8 4625 1176

FEDERAL REGISTER 66 FR 38939 60 FR 49772 Unknown 73 FR 48 67 FR 62376

# TABLE 5 - RACT SIP SUMMARY

FINAL RACT SIP ADOPTED JULY 13, 2010 DISTRICT IMPERIAL COUNTY MOJAVE DESERT VENTURA SAN JOAQUIN SOUTH COAST RULE NUMBER 417 442 74.6.1 4661 442

TITLE Organic Solvents Usage of Solvents Batch Loaded Vapor Degreasers Organic Solvents Usage of Solvents

ADOPTED 11/4/1977 5/7/1976 11/11/2003 5/21/1992 5/7/1976 LAST AMENDED Sep 14, 1999 Feb 27, 2006 Jul 01, 2004 Sep 20, 2007 Dec 15, 2000

EMISSIONS LIMITS Solvent exposure to flame, baking or oxidizing: no discharge of more than 15 lbs in ony one day nor more than 3 lbs in any one hour of organic solvent vapors. Using or applying photochemically reactive solvent no discharge of more than 40 lbs in any one day nor more than 8 lbs in any one hour. No VOC discharge in excess of 540 kilograms (1,190 lbs) per month per facility. No VOC organic solvent excess of 272 kilograms (600 lbs) per day as calculated on a thirty (30) day rolling average. Use of VOC emission collection and control system with a reduction of 85%. Storage shall bein non-absorbent, nonleaking containers kept closed at all times. No specific limit addressed work practices include freeboard specifications; spray capabilities, condenser flow and switches, automated parts handling systems and control devices such as superheated vapor zone. Minimizing solvent carryout, controlling leaks, storage and disposal. Solvent subject to heat: no discharge of more than 15 lbs of VOC emissions in any one (1) day. Any VOC emissions control system must be approved by the APCO and have an overall capture and control efficiency of at least 85% by weight. Photochemically reactive solvents: no discharge of more than 40lbs of VOC emissions in any one(1) day. On and after March 21, 2008 no discharge in excess of 833 lbs VOC per calendar month per No discharge unless emissions reduced by at least 85%. Materials exposed to heat not to exceed 6.5 kilograms (14.3lbs)/day. Materials exposed photochemically are limited to 18 kilogram (39.6lbs)/day. Material not exposed to photochemical reactive solvent w s are limited to 272 kilograms (600lbs)/day. Effective 01/01/2003 emissions in excess of 833 lbs/month per facility are not allowed. RULE APPROVAL BY EPA 11/05/2002 09/17/2007 11/11/2003 version approved on 10/25/2005 05/16/2002 version approved on 9/16/2003 05/23/2002

FEDERAL REGISTER 67 FR 67313 72 FR 52791 70 FR 61561 68 FR 54167 67 FR 36105

# TABLE 5 - RACT SIP SUMMARY

FINAL RACT SIP ADOPTED JULY 13, 2010 DISTRICT IMPERIAL COUNTY MOJAVE DESERT VENTURA SAN JOAQUIN SOUTH COAST RULE NUMBER 424 1113 74.2 4601 1113

TITLE Architectural Coatings Architectural Coatings Architectural C oatings Architectural Coatings Architectural Coatings

ADOPTED 11/9/1982 2/20/1979 6/19/1979 4/11/1991 9/2/1977 LAST AMENDED Jan 11, 2005 Feb 24, 2003 Nov 13, 2001 Oct 31, 2001 Jul 13, 2007

EMISSIONS LIMITS VOC content limits effective 05/01/2005 Coating limits range from 100 to 730 grams of VOC per liter of Coating. VOC content limits effective 01/01/2011 and 01/01/2012 have coating limits range from 50 to 730 grams of VOC per liter of Coating. Mo st restrictive VOC content limit applies. VOC content limits effective 01/01/2004 coating limits range from 100 to 730 grams of VOC per liter of Coating Most restrictive VOC content limit applies VOC Content Limits effective 01/01/2004 Coating limits range from 120 to 730 grams of VOC per liter of Coating. Most restrictive VOC content limit applies VOC Content Limits effective 01/01/2004 Coating limits range from 100 to 730 grams of VOC per liter of Coating. Most restrictive VOC content limit applies VOC Content Limits effective 07/01/2008 Coating limits range from 50 to 730 grams of VOC per liter of Coating. Most restrictive VOC content limit applies

RULE APPROVAL BY EPA 01/04/2007 CARB RACT/BARCT Determination last updated 10/1998 01/02/2004 01/02/2004 01/02/2004 11/08/1996 version approved on 6/21/1999

FEDERAL REGISTER 72 FR 267 69 FR 34 69 FR 34 69 FR 34 64 FR 33018

# TABLE 5 - RACT SIP SUMMARY

FINAL RACT SIP ADOPTED JULY 13, 2010 DISTRICT IMPERIAL COUNTY MOJAVE DESERT VENTURA SAN JOAQUIN SOUTH COAST RULE NUMBER 425 1118 74.13 4605 1124

TITLE Aerospace Coating Operations Aerospace Vehicle Parts and Products Coating Opeations Aerospace Assembly and Component

Manufacturing

Operations Aerospace Assembly and Component Coating Operations Aerospace Assembly and Component

Manufacturing

Operations ADOPTED 8/5/1989 10/28/1996 4/15/1986 12/19/1991 7/6/1979 LAST AMENDED Feb 23, 2010 Nov 11, 2003 Sep 20, 2007 Sep 21, 2001

EMISSIONS LIMITS ROC Content Limits for Primers, Coatings, Adhesives, Sealants, Maskants and Lubricants range from 250 to 1000 grams/liter VOC limits for Primers, Coatings, Adhesives, Sealants, Maskants and Lubricants range from 50 to 1000 grams/liter ROC Content Limits for Primers, Coatings, Adhesives, Sealants, maskants and Lubricants range from 50 to 1000 grams/liter VOC limits for Primers, Coatings, Adhesives, Sealants, maskants and Lubricants range from 50 to 1000 grams/liter VOC Content Limits for Primers, Coatings, Adhesives, Sealants, Maskants and Lubricants range from 250 grams/litter to 1000g/liter RULE APPROVAL BY EPA 05/19/2005 CARB RACT/BARCT Determination last updated 10/1998 08/17/1998 10/25/2005 02/20/2001 version approved on 11/14/2003 08/13/2002

FEDERAL REGISTER 70 FR 28826 63 FR 43884 70 FR 61561 68 FR 64537 67 FR 52611

# TABLE 5 - RACT SIP SUMMARY

FINAL RACT SIP ADOPTED JULY 13, 2010 DISTRICT IMPERIAL COUNTY MOJAVE DESERT VENTURA SAN JOAQUIN SOUTH COAST 1108 1108.1 TITLE Cutback Asphalt and Emulsified Paving Materials Cutback and Emulsified Asphalt Cutback Asphalt Cutback, Slow Cure, and Emulsified Asphalt, paving and Maintenance Operations Cutback Asphalt Emulsified Asphalt

5/4/1979 8/3/1979 Feb 01, 1985 Nov 04, 1983 EMISSIONS LIMITS Not use Rapid, Medium, Slow cure Cutback Asphalt or Emulsified Asphalt containing petroleum solvents in excess of 3% by volume Not use Rapid cure cutback asphalt; medium cure cutback asphalt or slow cure cutback asphalt containing more than 0.5% by volume of VOC which evaporate s at 260oC (500oF) as determined by ASTM Method D244-92. Not use Rapid cure cutback asphalt; except when used solely as a penetrating prime coat or where the Nati o nal Weather Service official forecast of the high temperature for the 24-hour period following applications. Road oils used for highway or street paving or maintenance applications shall contain no more than 0.5% of organic compounds which boil at less than 500oF as determined by ASTM D402. Not use for penetrating prime coat, tack coat, dust palliative, or other paving and maintenance operations Rapid cure cutback asphalt, medium cure cutback asphalt or Slow cure asphalt containing more than 1/2 (0.5)% of organic compounds which evaporate at 500oF or Emulsified asphalt containing organic compounds in excess of three(3)% by volume which evaporates at 500oF or lower. Not use, sell or offer for sale cutback aspha l t containing more than 0.5% by volume organic compound which evaporates at 260oC (500oF) or lower as determined by ASTM Method D402 or other test me t ht od as approved by the Executive Officer. |No emulsified asphalt with organic compounds which evaporates at 260oC (500oF) or lower as determined by ASTM Method D402 or other test me t ht od as approved by the Executive Officer: Slow, Rapid or Medium setting type with 3% by volume LAST AMENDED Sep 14, 1999 Jul 05, 1983 Dec 17, 1992 4/11/1991 6/19/1979 12/21/1994 2/10/1981 ADOPTED RULE NUMBER 426 1103 74.4 4641

# TABLE 5 - RACT SIP SUMMARY

FINAL RACT SIP ADOPTED JULY 13, 2010 DISTRICT IMPERIAL COUNTY MOJAVE DESERT VENTURA SAN JOAQUIN SOUTH COAST 1108 1108.1 RULE NUMBER 426 1103 74.4 4641

RULE APPROVAL BY EPA 04/19/2001 02/05/1996 04/17/1987 01/02/2008 07/12/1990 01/24/1985

55 FR 28624 50 FR 3338 FEDERAL REGISTER 66 FR 20084 61 FR 4215 Unknown 73 FR 48

# TABLE 5 - RACT SIP SUMMARY

FINAL RACT SIP ADOPTED JULY 13, 2010 DISTRICT IMPERIAL COUNTY MOJAVE DESERT VENTURA SAN JOAQUIN SOUTH COAST 4602 4612 Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating Operations Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating Operations Phase II 4/11/1991 9/21/2006 Sep 21, 2006 Sep 20, 2007 EMISSIONS LIMITS VOC Limits for Primers, Topcoats, Coatings range from 60 to 680 grams/liter VOC Limits for Group I and Group II Vehicles for Primers, Topcoats, Coatings range from 250 to 750 grams/liter ROC Limits for automotive coatings for motor vehicles, mobile equipment for Primers, Topcoats, Coatings range from 60 to 680 grams/liter VOC Limits for Group I and Group II Vehicles during finishing or refinish using Primers, Topcoats, Coatings have a range from 250 to 600 grams/liter. |VOC Limits fro Group I and Group II Vehicles using Primers, Topcoats, Coatings have a range from 250 to 680 grams/liter Electrophoretic primer: VOC content in excess of 145 grams/liter (1.2lbs/gal) of coating not allowed. Final repair coating: VOC content in excess of 580grams/liter (4.8lbs/gal) of coating not allowed. Alternatives include an Emission Control Plan and An approved Emission Control System with a reduction equivalent or greater than the required limits. 12/20/2001 version approved on 06/26/2002 Pending Review FEDERAL 66 FR 50319 65 FR 18901 66 FR 20086 67 FR 42999 60 FR 36227 3/2/1979

May 12, 1995

RULE APPROVAL BY EPA 9/14/1999 revision was approved 10/3/2 001 04/10/2000 09/10/96 revision approved on

4/19/2001 07/14/1995 LAST AMENDED Feb 23, 2010 Apr 26, 1999 Nov 11, 2008 ADOPTED 9/14/1999 3/2/1992 1/28/1992 1115

TITLE Automotive Refinishing Operations Automotive Refinishing Operations Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating Operations Motor Vehicle Assembly Line Coating Operations RULE NUMBER 427 1116 74.18