alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
April 14, 1977 

The Honorable Terence S. Weakly Opinion Wo. Ii- 980 

Kleberg County Attorney 

Ringsvilla, Texas Re: Whether failure to 

deliver collateral is an 

offense under section 

32.33 of the Penal Code. 

Dear Mr. Weakly: 

You have requested our opinion concerning whether there 

is a concealment under section 32.33 of the Penal Code where 

a debtor refurrea to deliver collateral upon demand of a 

secured party but does not harm or reduce the value of the 

collateral. 

Section 32.33 provides in part: 

(b) A person who has signed a security 

agreement creating a secuiity intere8t in 

property or a mortgage or deed of trust 

creating a lien on property comaits an 

offense if, with intent to hinder enforcement of that interest or lien, he destroys, 

removes, conceals, encumbers, transfers, or 

otherwise harms or reduces the value of the 

property. 

(c) For purposes of this section, a 

person is presumed to have intended to hinder 

enforceraent of the security interest or lien 

if, when any part of the debt secured by, the 

security interest or lien waa due, he failed: 

(1) to pay the part then due; and 

(2) if the secured party had made demand, 

to deliver possession of the secured 

property to the secured party. 

p. 4002 
The Honorable Terence S. Weakly - page 2 (H-980) 

Subsection (b) provides for two elements of the OffenSe- The 

first is an intent to hinder enforcement of the lien: the 

second is to destroy, remove, conceal, encumber, transfer, 

or otherwise harm or reduce the value of the property. With 

respect ,to the second element, the mere failure to deliver 

possession'is clearly not within the definitions of destroy, 

remove, encumber, transfer, or otherwise harm or reduce the 

value of the property. You have asked whether such a failure 

is within the definition of "conceal.* 

The intent of section 32.33 is apparently to. protect 

secured property for the benefit of the.creditor. The 

clause "otherwise ham or reduces the value of the property" 

implies that the forementioned acts also harm or reduce 

such value.. .Certainly the mere failure to deliver property 

generally would not reduce its value. Accordingly, we do 

not believe that such a failure would in itself constitute 

a concealment. We are further supported in thi5 view by 

subsection (c) whigh makes the failure to deliver a facet of 

the first element of the offense, an intent to-hinder enforcement of the lien. In our view a concealment'under aubaection 

(bt ;uuat entail some further act beyona mere failure to deliver, 

otherwise the entire aecona element of the offense woula,be 

5upcrfluoua. See 53 Tex. Jur.Zd Statute8 S 165, and authoritierr cited thzin. 

SUMYARY 

The mere refusal to deliver propexty to 

a secured party is not an offense under 

section 32.33 of the Penal Code: 

Very truly yours, A 

APPROVED: 

Opinion'Committee 

p. 4083
#### § 945.125 Disqualification.

The committee from time to time may conduct surveys of handling of potatoes for special purposes requiring Certificates of Privilege to determine whether handlers are complying with the requirements and regulations applicable to such certificates. Whenever the committee finds that a handler or consignee is failing to comply with requirements and regulations applicable to handling of potatoes in special outlets, and requiring such certificates, a Certificate or Certificates of Privilege issued such handler may be rescinded and further certificates denied. Such disqualification shall apply to, and not exceed, a reasonable period of time as determined by the committee but in no event shall it extend beyond the end of the succeeding fiscal period. Any handler who has a certificate rescinded or denied may appeal to the committee in writing for reconsideration of his disqualification.
1335.001 Definitions.       *Human subject* means a living individual about whom an investigator (whether professional or student) conducting research obtains:                    (1)  			Data through intervention or interaction with the individual, or          (2) Identifiable private information.          *Intervention* includes both physical procedures by which data are gathered (for example, venipuncture) and manipulations of the subject or the subject's environment that are performed for research purposes. Interaction includes communication or interpersonal contact between investigator and subject. “Private information” includes information about behavior that occurs in a context in which an individual can reasonably expect that no observation or recording is taking place, and information which has been provided for specific purposes by an individual and which the individual can reasonably expect will not be made public (for example, a medical record). Private information must be individually identifiable (*i.e.,* the identity of the subject is or may readily be ascertained by the investigator or associated with the information) in order for obtaining the information to constitute research involving human subjects.          *Research* means a systematic investigation, including research, development, testing and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge. Activities which meet this definition constitute research for purposes of this policy, whether or not they are conducted or supported under a program which is considered research for other purposes. For example, some demonstration and service programs may include research activities.    **Parent topic:** PART 1335 - RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING
Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 34 Filed 01/29/2007 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 34 Filed 01/29/2007 Page 2 of 8
Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 34 Filed 01/29/2007 Page 3 of 8
Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 34 Filed 01/29/2007 Page 4 of 8
Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 34 Filed 01/29/2007 Page 5 of 8
Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 34 Filed 01/29/2007 Page 6 of 8
Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 34 Filed 01/29/2007 Page 7 of 8
Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 34 Filed 01/29/2007 Page 8 of 8
STOCK CANCELLATION AGREEMENT

To
     Goldtown Investments Corp.PH1  989 Beatty Street,Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6Z 3C2From
     Blair LawPH1  989 Beatty Street,Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6Z 3C2Date
     October 2, 2007




The parties hereby agree to cancel 93,800,000 common shares purchased by Blair Law pursuant to the subscription agreement which I entered into with Goldtown Investments Corp. on April 26, 2006.

/s/ Blair LawBlair Law/s/ Blair LawGoldtown Investments Corp.Per: Blair Law


---
§ 51.1269 Sizing. ( a ) The numerical count, or the minimum size of the pears packed in closed containers shall be indicated on the package. The number of pears in the box shall not vary more than 3 from the number indicated on the box.
( b ) When the numerical count is marked on western standard pear boxes the pears shall not vary more than three-eighths inch in their transverse diameter for counts 120 or less; one-fourth inch for counts 135 to 180, inclusive; and three-sixteenths inch for counts 193 or more.
( c ) When the numerical count is marked on western standard half boxes or special half boxes packed three tiers deep, the pears shall not vary more than three-eighths inch for counts 75 or less; one-fourths inch for counts 80 to 110, inclusive; and three-sixteenths inch for counts 115 or more.
( d ) When the numerical count is marked on western standard half boxes or special half boxes packed two tiers deep, the pears shall not vary more than three-eighths inch for counts 50 or less; one-fourth inch for counts 55 to 70, inclusive; and three-sixteenths inch for counts 80 or more.
( e ) When the numerical count is not shown, the minimum size shall be plainly stamped, stenciled or otherwise marked on the container in terms of whole inches, whole and half inches, whole and quarter inches, or whole and eighth inches, as 21 ⁄ 2 inches minimum, 21 ⁄ 4 inches minimum, or 25 ⁄ 8 inches minimum, in accordance with the facts. It is suggested that both minimum and maximum sizes be marked on the container, as 21 ⁄ 4 to 23 ⁄ 4 inches, 21 ⁄ 2 to 23 ⁄ 4 inches, as such marking is especially desirable for pears marketed in the export trade.
( f ) “Size” means the greatest transverse diameter of the pear taken at right angles to a line running from the stem to the blossom end.
# L_2016337EN.01002401.xml

| 13.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 337/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 337/24

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) No 519/2014 of 16 May 2014 amending Regulation (EC) No 401/2006 as regards methods of sampling of large lots, spices and food supplements, performance criteria for T-2, HT-2 toxin and citrinin and screening methods of analysis

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 147 of 17 May 2014
  )

On page 34, Annex II replacing Annex II to Commission Regulation (EC) No 401/2006, point 4.3.1.1(a) ‘Performance criteria for aflatoxins’, the table is replaced as follows:

| ‘Criterion | Concentration Range | Recommended Value | Maximum permitted Value |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Blanks | All | Negligible | — |
| | | | |
| Recovery — Aflatoxin M1 | 0,01-0,05 μg/kg | 60 to 120 % | |
| | > 0,05 μg/kg | 70 to 110 % | |
| | | | |
| Recovery — Aflatoxins B1, B2, G1, G2 | < 1,0 μg/kg | 50 to 120 % | |
| | 1-10 μg/kg | 70 to 110 % | |
| | > 10 μg/kg | 80 to 110 % | |
| | | | |
| Reproducibility RSDR | All | As derived from Horwitz Equation (*)(**) | 2 × value derived from Horwitz Equation (*)(**) |
| Repeatability RSDr may be calculated as 0,66 times Reproducibility RSDR at the concentration of interest.’ |

‘Criterion

Concentration Range

Recommended Value

Maximum permitted Value

Blanks

All

Negligible

—

Recovery — Aflatoxin M1

0,01-0,05 μg/kg

60 to 120 %

> 0,05 μg/kg

70 to 110 %

Recovery — Aflatoxins B1, B2, G1, G2

< 1,0 μg/kg

50 to 120 %

1-10 μg/kg

70 to 110 %

> 10 μg/kg

80 to 110 %

Reproducibility RSDR

All

As derived from Horwitz Equation (*)(**)

2 × value derived from Horwitz Equation (*)(**)

Repeatability RSDr may be calculated as 0,66 times Reproducibility RSDR at the concentration of interest.’

---
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 335 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.335

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and five

                                 An Act

 
               To reauthorize the Congressional Award Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE CONGRESSIONAL AWARD ACT.

    (a) Extension of Requirements Regarding Financial Operations of 
Congressional Award Program; Noncompliance With Requirements.--Section 
104(c)(2)(A) of the Congressional Award Act (2 U.S.C. 804(c)(2)(A)) is 
amended by striking ``and 2004'' and inserting ``2004, 2005, 2006, 
2007, 2008, and 2009''.
    (b) Termination.--
        (1) In general.--Section 108 of the Congressional Award Act (2 
    U.S.C. 808) is amended by striking ``October 1, 2004'' and 
    inserting ``October 1, 2009''.
        (2) Savings provision.--During the period of October 1, 2004, 
    through the date of the enactment of this section, all actions and 
    functions of the Congressional Award Board under the Congressional 
    Award Act (2 U.S.C. 801 et seq.) shall have the same effect as 
    though no lapse or termination of the Board ever occurred.
    (c) Technical Amendments.--The Congressional Award Act is amended--
        (1) in section 103 (2 U.S.C. 803)--
            (A) in subsection (a)(1)(B) and (C), by striking ``a a 
        local'' and inserting ``a local''; and
            (B) in subsection (b)(3)(B), by striking ``section'' each 
        place it appears and inserting ``subsection''; and
        (2) in section 104(c)(2)(A) (2 U.S.C. 804(c)(2)(A)), by 
    inserting a comma after ``1993''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2508
FRANKLIN LEE MINOR, SR.; MARY LOU CARPENTER, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus ROBERT D. HORSEY, Judge; SPIRO BUAS, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA96-2870-S) Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: December 31, 1996 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Franklin Lee Minor, Mary Lou Carpenter, Appellants Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal the district court's order dismissing their petition for writ of mandamus as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Minor v. Horsey , No. CA-96-2870-S (D. Md. Sept. 25, 1996).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case 1:06-cr-00185-CSC Document 7 Filed 09/27/2006 Page 1 of 1
1430.202-2 Impracticality of submission.

The CO shall prepare any request to award a contract without the required contractor submission of

the Form No. CASB-DS-1, Disclosure Statement, and submit it through the HCA, to the Director,

PAM, and to the Secretary for approval. The Secretary, without the power of redelegation, must file

a report to CASB within 30 days in accordance with 48 CFR 9903.202-2 (FAR Appendix).

Parent topic: Subpart 1430.2 - CAS Program Requirements
#### § 945.7 Certified seed potatoes.

*Certified seed potatoes* means and includes all potatoes officially certified and tagged, marked, or otherwise appropriately identified, under the supervision of the official seed potato certifying agency of the State in which the potatoes are grown, or other seed certification agencies which the Secretary may designate.
#### § 985.21 Eligibility.

Each member and alternate member of the Committee shall be, at the time of selection and during the term of office, a producer, or an officer or employee of a producer, in the district for which selected: *Provided,* That these requirements should not apply to the public member and alternate member.
Subparts 1419.9 - 1419.10 [Reserved]

Parent topic: PART 1419 - SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

BARBARA M. JEFFERS, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) Case No. 3:06-cv-0685-WKW

) 

RUSSELL COUNTY BOARD OF )

EDUCATION, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

By the Amended Uniform Scheduling Order dated June 21, 2007 (Doc. # 18), the

parties were ordered to conduct their face-to-face settlement conference by December 31,

2007. The Uniform Scheduling Order requires counsel for the plaintiff to file with the court

the “Notice Concerning Settlement Conference and Mediation” within five days of the date

of the settlement conference. There having been no notice filed, it is hereby ORDERED that

the counsel for the plaintiff on or before January 21, 2008, shall either file the notice or

show cause in writing why counsel has failed to comply with the court’s orders.

DONE this 14th day of January, 2008.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 50 Filed 01/14/2008 Page 1 of 1
ANNEX 8 - PEER REVIEW ROLLING

FORECAST

Reporting requirements. DON Contracting Activities shall submit quarterly, by March 10, June 10,

September 10, and December 10, a rolling forecast of acquisitions requiring peer reviews by

DASN(P) or DPC. Use the DON Peer Review Rolling Forecast spreadsheet format when submitting

reports. Submit reports via email to mailto:usn.pentagon.asstsecnavrdadc.mbx.pabt@us.navy.mil

with the subject: “DFARS 201.170 – Peer Review Rolling Forecast.” The electronic version of this

template is available on the website https://www.secnav.navy.mil/rda/DASNP/Pages/NMCARS.aspxidentified at NMCARS 5201.105-3 Copies..

DON Peer Review Rolling Forecast Spreadsheet

-continued columns on spreadsheet
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Centenary International Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,Carlos Fabian De Sousa, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Carlos Fabian De
  SousaCarlos
      Fabian De SousaChief
      Executive OfficerNovember 1, 2010





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The
foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q solely
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and are not
being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure
document.
#### Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc., Formerly Known as National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., Respondent, v John J. Fiero et al., Appellants.

Submitted August 20, 2007;

decided October 16, 2007

Reported below, 33 AD3d 547.

Motion to expand the record on appeal herein denied.
Case 2:06-cv-00633-MEF-VPM Document 5 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00633-MEF-VPM Document 5 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00633-MEF-VPM Document 5 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00633-MEF-VPM Document 5 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 4 of 4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

BARBARA M. JEFFERS, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) Case No. 3:06-cv-0685-WKW

) 

RUSSELL COUNTY BOARD OF )

EDUCATION, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

Upon consideration of Defendant Russell County Board of Education’s Motion to

Amend Answer (Doc. # 28) and the plaintiffs’ failure to show cause why the motion should

not be granted as ordered by the court (Doc. # 38), it is ORDERED that Defendant Russell

County Board of Education’s Motion to Amend Answer (Doc. # 28) is GRANTED. In

accordance with the Middle District of Alabama’s Civil Administrative Procedures, Section

II.A.5, Defendant Russell County Board of Education shall file electronically an exact

duplicate of the amended answer that is attached to their motion (Doc. # 28-3) on or before

January 14, 2008.

DONE this 7th day of January, 2008.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 47 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

June 25, 2007

NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE

To: ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD

Case Style: Clifford Alston v. Christopher Askew, et al.

Case Number: #3:06-cv-00722-WKW

Referenced Pleading: Objection to Notice of 30(b)(5) & (b) Deposition of Ruby White 

 d/b/a Air Ride Trucking 

Docket Entry Number: 21

The referenced pleading was electronically filed on 6/25/2007 in this case and is not in

compliance with the local rules and/or administrative procedures of this court. 

******This pleading is discovery and is not allowed pursuant to Local Rule 5.1 NON-FILING

OF CIVIL DISCOVERY.

The pleading is hereby STRICKEN from the record and the parties are instructed to disregard

the entry of this pleading on the court’s docket. Parties should be aware that the striking of

this entry does not affect their responsibilities as to the discovery process.

Case 3:06-cv-00722-WKW-TFM Document 22 Filed 06/25/2007 Page 1 of 1
Local Rule 5.1

NON-FILING OF CIVIL DISCOVERY

Unless the Court directs otherwise, in all civil actions other than inmate complaints

challenging the conditions of confinement:

A. Interrogatories, requests for production, requests for admissions and responses

thereto, and notices of depositions shall be served in accordance with Rule 5(b), FED.R.CIV.P.,

but shall not be filed with the Clerk except upon order of the Court or for use at trial or in

connection with motions. The party responsible for service of the discovery material shall retain

the original and become custodian.

B. No depositions shall be filed with the Clerk unless the Court directs otherwise, or

unless in support of or in opposition to a motion. Counsel who notices a deposition shall be the

custodian of the deposition and shall maintain the original for filing if the Court so directs.

C. If discovery materials are germane to any motion or response, only the relevant

material need be filed with the motion or response.

D. During the pendency of any case the custodian of any discovery material shall

provide to counsel for all other parties reasonable access to the material and an opportunity to

duplicate the material at the expense of the copying party, and any other person may, with leave

of Court, obtain a copy of any discovery material from its custodian upon payment of the expense

of the copy.

E. When documentation of discovery not previously in the record is needed for appeal

purposes, upon an application and order of the Court, or by stipulation of counsel, the necessary

discovery papers shall be filed with the Clerk.

F. Any discovery material, depositions and trial exhibits filed with the Clerk will be

disposed of by the Clerk as set out by M.D. Ala. LR 5.2.

Case 3:06-cv-00722-WKW-TFM Document 22-2 Filed 06/25/2007 Page 1 of 1