alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with
the Annual Report of Synthesis Energy Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2014 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
Roger Ondreko, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                  

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:
October 28, 2014



| | /s/ Roger Ondreko                                          
| | -----------------------------------------------------------
| | Roger Ondreko
        Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
#### § 948.120 General.

Whenever shipments of potatoes for special purposes under § 948.23 are relieved in whole or in part from grade and size regulations issued under § 948.22 the committee shall require information and evidence as to the manner, methods, and timing of such shipments as safeguards against the entry of any such potatoes into trade channels other than those for which intended. Such information and evidence shall include the requirements set forth below with respect to Certificates of Privilege.
50.102-2 Contract adjustment boards.

The DISA Contract Adjustment Board shall be composed of the following members:

SPE Chairperson

HCA Vice Chairperson and Member

General Counsel Member

The Board considers and evaluates requests for contract adjustments and recommends appropriate

action to the Director. The findings of the Board are advisory. The HCA shall assume staff and

administrative cognizance of contract adjustment matters and supply secretarial and recorder

services for the operation of the Board.

A majority constitutes a quorum for any purpose and the concurring vote of a majority of the total

board membership constitutes an action of the board. Alternates may be appointed to act in the

absence of any member.

Parent topic: SUBPART 50.1 EXTRAORDINARY CONTRACTUAL ACTIONS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

EASTERN DIVISION 

BARBARA M. JEFFERS and ) 

JOAN K. CRAIG, ) 

) 

 Plaintiffs, ) 

 ) 

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06 CV 685 WKW 

) 

RUSSELL COUNTY BOARD OF ) 

EDUCATION and CHARLES NACRELLI, ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL FOR BARBARA M. JEFFERS, JOAN K.CRAIG 

AND THE RUSSELL COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION 

 It is hereby stipulated by and between the Plaintiffs Barbara M. Jeffers and Joan K. Craig 

and Defendant Russell County Board of Education that the above styled cause shall be dismissed 

with prejudice as between the Plaintiffs and the Defendant Russell County Board of Education, 

each party to bear its own costs. The Plaintiffs’ claims against the Defendant Charles Nacrelli are 

not dismissed herein. 

This the 11th day of March, 2008. 

 SMITH & SMITH 

 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 

 BY: /s/ Sydney S. Smith 

 Sydney S. Smith 

 Attorney for Defendant 

 Russell County Board of Education 

 1503 Broad Street 

 Phenix City, Alabama 36867 

 (334) 298-2679 

 ASB-4248-582S 

 /s/ W. Don Eddins 

 337 E. Magnolia Avenue, Suite 3, 

 Auburn, AL 36830, 

 Counsel for Plaintiff 

 (334) 821-9981 

 ASB-1424-S65W 

1 

Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 63 Filed 03/11/2008 Page 1 of 2
2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

We hereby certify that we have filed today, March 11, 2008, by CM/ECF, the above and 

foregoing with a copy being served upon: 

 Matthew C. Williams, Esq. 

matt@esw-law.com 

 

 /s/Sydney S. Smith 

 /s/W. Don Eddins 

CV/.C-06-045 StipDismissal 

Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 63 Filed 03/11/2008 Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

 DA 24-0140

_________________________________________________________________

STILLWATER MINING COMPANY,

Plaintiff/Appellant

v.

AIG CLAIMS, INC.,

Defendant/Appellee.

_________________________________________________________

ORDER 

_________________________________________________________

The parties have stipulated to retain Guy Rogers as the mediator in this case

pursuant to Rule 7(4)(b), Montana Rules of Appellate Procedure. The parties

further stipulate to hold the deadlines imposed for briefing in abeyance until the

earlier of the date of the filing of the mediator’s report or expiration of the 75-day

time limit set forth in Rule 7(3)(a), Montana Rules of Appellate Procedure. 

For good cause showing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadlines

imposed for briefing are held in abeyance until the earlier of the date of the filing

of the mediator’s report or expiration of the 75-day time limit set forth in Rule

7(3)(a), Montana Rules of Appellate Procedure. 

DATED this ____ day of March, 2024.

By: _____________________________

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 27 2024

03/27/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0140
Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 37 Filed 03/01/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 37 Filed 03/01/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 37 Filed 03/01/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 37 Filed 03/01/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 37 Filed 03/01/2007 Page 5 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 37-2 Filed 03/01/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 37-3 Filed 03/01/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### § 966.41 Budget.

At the beginning of each fiscal period and as may be necessary thereafter, the committee shall prepare an estimated budget of income and expenditures necessary for the administration of this part. The committee may recommend a rate of assessment calculated to provide adequate funds to defray its proposed expenditures. The committee shall present such budget to the Secretary with an accompanying report showing the basis for its calculations.
Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 3 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 1 of 1
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3092 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Okuma double column drilling machines. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. BROWNBACK introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Okuma double column 

drilling machines. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. OKUMA DOUBLE COLUMN DRILLING MA4 CHINES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.84.59 Okuma double column drilling machines 

(provided for in subheading 8459.21.00) Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 3092 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
#### § 930.11 Handler.

*Handler* means any person who first handles cherries or causes cherries to be handled for his or her own account.
§ 932.39 Assessments. ( a ) As each handler's pro rata share of the expenses which the Secretary finds are reasonable and likely to be incurred by the committee during a fiscal year, each handler who first handles olives during the current crop year shall pay to the committee, upon demand, assessments less any amounts which may be credited pursuant to § 932.45, on all olives to be used in the production of packaged olives, including olives to be used in canned ripe olives of the “tree-ripened” type or green olives when such are regulated as packaged olives pursuant to § 932.52. The payment of assessments for maintenance and functioning of the committee may be required under this part throughout the period it is in effect irrespective of whether particular provisions thereof are suspended or become inoperative.
( b ) The Secretary shall fix the rate of assessment to be paid by each such handler during a fiscal year in an amount designed to secure sufficient funds to cover the expenses which may be incurred during such period. At any time during or after the fiscal year, the Secretary may increase the rate of assessment in order to secure sufficient funds to cover any later finding by the Secretary relative to the expenses which may be incurred. Such increase shall be applied to all olives handled during the applicable crop year. In order to provide funds for the administration of the provisions of this part during the first part of a fiscal year before sufficient operation income is available from assessments, the committee may accept the payment of assessments in advance, and may also borrow money for such purpose.
( c ) Any assessment not paid by a handler within a period of time prescribed by the committee may be subject to an interest or late payment charge, or both. The period of time, rate of interest and late payment charge shall be as recommended by the committee and approved by the Secretary. Subsequent to such approval, all assessments not paid within the prescribed period of time shall be subject to an interest or late payment charge or both.
[47 FR 32908, July 30, 1982, as amended at 47 FR 51093, Nov. 12, 1982; 88 FR 82232, Nov. 24, 2023]
Planificación 

de Comidas 

durante la

Pandemia del 

Coronavirus

Para obtener más información sobre 

la respuesta al COVID-19 del 

Servicio de Alimentos y Nutrición, visite

FNS.USDA.GOV/CORONAVIRUS

Mayo 2020
Primero mire en su refrigerador, congelador y despensa—

y las fechas de caducidad y de consumo. Esto puede 

ayudarle a planificar comidas al usar lo que ya tiene, y 

ayudarle a limitar los viajes a la tienda de comestibles.

Haga una lista de las compras para estar enfocada/o en la 

tienda. Haga una lista de artículos generales como “fruta” o 

“pan” ya que las tiendas pueden no tener algunos artículos 

específicos.

Explore sus opciones de compra, como recogida en la 

tienda o entrega a domicilio, así como opciones de entrega 

a domicilio de terceros. Si usted es una persona mayor, 

verifique si su tienda tiene horarios de compras temprano 

en la mañana para estadounidenses de edad avanzada.

Compre lo que usted y su familia necesitan en este momento, 

y resista el impulso de comprar en cantidades mucho mayores. 

Prepare una lista de la compra que cubra a todos en su hogar 

durante 2 semanas.

Elija una combinación de alimentos de larga duración, 

congelados y frescos. Ejemplos de productos de larga 

duración: arroz, legumbres, frijoles, mantequillas de frutos 

secos y productos deshidratados y enlatados. Ejemplos 

de productos congelados: panes, carnes, verduras, frutas, 

incluso leche. En cuanto a los alimentos frescos, compre 

una variedad en cantidades que 

compraría normalmente.

El USDA es un proveedor, empleador y prestamista que ofrece 

igualdad de oportunidades.

Coma primero los alimentos frescos. Llene el congelador y 

la despensa con alimentos que pueda comer en la segunda 

semana y después. 

¿Qué debo preparar? Ya que están todos juntos en casa, 

pruebe una nueva receta o experimente nuevos sabores 

para mantener las cosas interesantes. A otras personas, 

continuar con las comidas y sabores familiares o sencillos 

les brinda comodidad. 

Acceso a la comida mientras la escuela está cerrada. 

Muchos distritos escolares continúan brindando comidas a 

los estudiantes necesitados durante el cierre de las escuelas. 

Comuníquese con su escuela para ver si las comidas pueden 

estar disponibles a través de sistemas temporales de distribución de alimentos, recogidas de comida para llevar o rutas 

de autobuses escolares.

Para una versión ampliada de esta tarjeta de consejos, así 

como de los recursos sobre planificación de alimentos y 

actividades para las familias en casa, vaya a 

MYPLATE.GOV/CORONAVIRUS.

Para obtener más información sobre el COVID-19, visite 

CORONAVIRUS.GOV. 

Consejos sobre planificación de comidas: incluyen qué comprar, cuánto comprar y 

consejos de preparación

Comience

con MiPlato
#### § 986.8 Council.

*Council* means the American Pecan Council established pursuant to § 986.45, American Pecan Council.
5628.370 Additional Clauses.

(Revised December 2011)

(g) For contracts utilizing the clauses specified in DFARS 228.370 , paragraphs (b) and (c), the

Contracting Officer is delegated the authority to appoint the Ground Flight Representative (GFR).

HQ, United States Special Operations Command

Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L)

SOFARS 5628

February 2007

Parent topic: Subpart 5628.3 - INSURANCE
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6011

ROGER BRUCE HERRELL,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. James E. Bradberry, Magistrate

Judge. (CA-01-24)

Submitted: March 21, 2002 Decided: March 29, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roger Bruce Herrell, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* This case was decided by a magistrate judge exercising

jurisdiction upon consent of the parties. 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(c)

(West 1993 & Supp. 2001).

2

PER CURIAM:

Roger Bruce Herrell appeals the magistrate judge’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2001).* We have reviewed the record and the magistrate

judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Herrell v. Angelone, No.

CA-01-24 (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 19, 2001; entered Nov. 20, 2001). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

BRIAN BONNER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 3:06cv715-MHT

) (WO) 

NORINCO a/k/a CHINA NORTH )

INDUSTRIES CORP., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

JUDGMENT

It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court

that the joint motion for dismissal (Doc. No. 122) is

granted and that defendant Qiqihar Hawk is dismissed

without prejudice, with costs taxed as paid.

The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this

document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant

to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

DONE, this the 17th day of February, 2009.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 123 Filed 02/17/09 Page 1 of 1
453.000 Scope of part.

This part:

(a) Prescribes USDA (AD) forms for use in acquisition,

(b) Contains requirements and information generally applicable to AD forms and forms prescribed by

FAR part 53, and

(c) Illustrates AD forms.

Parent topic: PART 453 - FORMS
Case 2:06-cv-00672-WKW-WC Document 7 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00672-WKW-WC Document 7 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00672-WKW-WC Document 7 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 3 of 3
#### LATUREN, Appellant, v. BOLTON DRUG CO., Limited, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 22, 1906.)

Action by Emma F. Laturen against the Bolton Drug Company, Limited.

No opinion. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied.
Opinion filed September 9, 2010



## In The



# Eleventh Court of Appeals

__________



### No. 11

- 10

- 00195

- CV

__________

DON EARL HUTTO , Appellant

V.

CITY OF CLEBU R NE ET AL , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 18 th District Court

Johnson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. T200800104

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The trial court signed its default judgment on June 18, 2009. One year later on June 18,

2010, Don Earl Hutto filed his p ro se notice of appeal. We dismiss.

On August 18, 2010, the clerk of this court wrote the parties advising them that it

appeared an appeal had not been timely perfected and requesting that Hutto respond showing

grou nds for continuing the appeal. Hutto h as responded to our August 18 letter. In his response,

Hutto states that he had no notice of the June 2009 hearing and that he was financially unable to

hire an attorney. Hutto argues the merits of his claims but does not establish how this court has

jur isdiction over his appeal.2

Hutto has not complied with the provisions of T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.1, 26.1, or 26.3 and,

therefore, has not properly perfected an appeal. The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

September 9, 201 0

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Strange, J.
VikingUAS-Viking One 3dMapping-UAS System Deployment 

Manual and Specifications 

Special design and optimized for long range 3dMapping and sensor data collection with built in 

camera sensor package its as easy as attach sensor and fly. Aircraft is setup and ready to fly. 

Easy for All Kind of Camera Mounting 

Are you tired of modification? Now you don’t have to. You can use many kinds of mounting. Stable, 

safe, and easy, just focus to make a video so you can map your area of operation. 

 
Special fuselage design 

Our unibody fuselage, which makes it more durable and stronger than other EPO foamy insert 

carbon tube designs can help avoid a tail stall during flight which allows for slower speeds and 

smoother flight characteristics. 

Foam under the microscope. 
VikingONE Specifications 

Material: VikingUAS Proprietary Material 

Wingspan: 1800mm (71inch) 

Length: 1078mm (42.5 inch) 

Wing area: 38.2dm2(592sq.in) 

Empty weight: 750g 

Barycentre position: in middle of wing, 65-80mm from leading edge 

Flying Weight: 1360g(23lb) Standard, max:2kg 

Wingload: 35.6g/dm2 (11.7oz/sq.ft) 

Barycentre position: in middle of wing, 65-80mm from leading edge 

Motor: 3536/KV1300 

ESC: Hobbywing pro 40A 

Propller: 2-paddle, 11X6 

Servos:9g digital servos x6 

 

RECOMMENDED SYSTEM: 

Battery: 14.8V 5000 mAh 25C Li-Po (no included) 

Radio: 9CH 
Radio Specifications 
This Document is Competition Sensitive and Confidential
LEGAL02/30203485v1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

BETTY J. ADAMS, et al., )

)

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

Civil Action No. 

2:06-CV-660-LES-CSC

PACTIV CORPORATION and LOUISIANAPACIFIC CORPORATION, )

)

)

Defendants. )

)

DEFENDANT LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORPORATION’S 

MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT SIX

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) and 7(b), Defendant Louisiana-Pacific Corporation 

(“Louisiana-Pacific”) moves this Court for an Order dismissing Count Six of Plaintiffs’

Complaint. As set forth in the accompanying Memorandum of Law, Count Six fails to state a 

valid claim under the Alabama Extended Manufacturer’s Liability Doctrine. Therefore, 

pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), Count Six must be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which 

relief may be granted.

Case 2:06-cv-00660-LES-CSC Document 12 Filed 12/22/2006 Page 1 of 4
2

LEGAL02/30203485v1

Respectfully submitted this 22nd day of December, 2006.

/s/Bernard Taylor

Bernard Taylor (admitted pro hac vice)

Douglas S. Arnold (admitted pro hac vice)

Orlyn O. Lockard, III (admitted pro hac vice)

Counsel for Defendant Louisiana-Pacific

Corporation

OF COUNSEL:

ALSTON & BIRD LLP

One Atlantic Center

1201 West Peachtree Street, N.W.

Atlanta, Georgia 30309

Tel: (404) 881-7000

Fax: (404) 881-7777

bernard.taylor@alston.com

doug.arnold@alston.com

skip.lockard@alston.com

ADDITIONAL COUNSEL:

Dennis R. Bailey 

ASB No. 4845-I71D

R. Austin Huffaker 

ASB NO. 3422-F55R

RUSHTON, STAKELY, JOHNSON, & GARRETT, P.A.

184 Commerce Street

Post Office Box 270

Montgomery, AL 36101

Tel: (334) 206-3100

Fax: (334) 262-6277

drb@rsjg.com (Bailey)

rah2@rsjg.com (Huffaker)

Case 2:06-cv-00660-LES-CSC Document 12 Filed 12/22/2006 Page 2 of 4
3

LEGAL02/30203485v1

Laura Proctor

ASB 1504-R54L

Associate General Counsel

Louisiana-Pacific Corporation

414 Union Street North, Suite 2000

Nashville, Tennessee 37219

Tel: (615) 986-5878

Fax: 1-866-741-5091

laura.proctor@lpcorp.com

Case 2:06-cv-00660-LES-CSC Document 12 Filed 12/22/2006 Page 3 of 4
4

LEGAL02/30203485v1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 22nd day of December, 2006, I filed the foregoing via the 

CM/ECF system which will send notice of said filing to the following:

W. Eason Mitchell

Gregory A. Cade

Fred R. DeLeon

W. Lee Gresham, III

Robert Leslie Palmer

Mark R. TerMolen

John C. Berghoff, Jr.

Matthew C. Sostrin

John A. Earnhardt

H. Thomas Wells, Jr.

Richard Elder Crum

/s/Orlyn O. Lockard, III

Of Counsel

Case 2:06-cv-00660-LES-CSC Document 12 Filed 12/22/2006 Page 4 of 4
#### § 984.473 Report of walnut receipts.

Each handler shall file a report of his walnut receipts from growers on or before January 15 of each marketing year on forms supplied by the Board.

[40 FR 22267, May 22, 1975]