alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Outdoor Channel Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, RogerL. Werner, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best ofmy knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ Roger L. Werner, Jr. |       |       |   |
|--------------------------|------------|------------|--------|
| **Roger L. Werner, Jr.** | ** ** | ** ** |
| Chief Executive Officer  |       |       |
| May 10, 2007             |       |       |

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toOutdoor Channel Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Outdoor ChannelHoldings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

----
#### § 966.31 Alternate members.

An alternate member of the committee shall act in the place and stead of the member for whom he is an alternate, during such member's absence. In the event of the death, removal, resignation, or disqualification of a member, his alternate shall act for him until a successor of such member is selected and has qualified.
Exhibit 4.3




 





Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We have issued our
report dated March 8, 2018, with respect to the financial statement of Smart Trust 369 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-222461) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration
Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


March 8, 2018
<PAGE> 24


                          COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

                                           
                                                  August 13, 1997

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC  20549

RE:  First Liberty Financial Corp.
     Registration on Form S-8

We are aware that our report dated August 13, 1997 on our review of interim 
financial information of First Liberty Financial Corp. and Subsidiaries for 
the three-month and nine-month periods ended June 30, 1997, and included in 
the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter then ended is 
incorporated by reference into the Company's registration statements on 
Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-247333 and 333-00385).  Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under 
the Securities Act of 1933, this report should not be considered a part of 
the registration statements prepared or certified by us within the meaning of 
Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.










































                                         24
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Philip R. Moran, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Greenblott, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 24, 1967, disqualifying claimant from unemployment insurance benefits, effective November 4, 1966, on the ground that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Appellant was employed by the publisher of a chain of newspapers for eight years, and for the last three years had served as editor of the Ossining Citizen-Register. The employer required that published editorials be in agreement with the basic policy of the paper on community questions as determined by its executive officers. Accordingly, appellant was required to submit his editorials on local issues to the editorial director of the publisher before they appeared in print. Prior to an election in 1966, claimant wrote an editorial supporting the incumbent mayor for re-election. Editorial approval was withheld and appellant thereupon announced that he no longer would serve as editor of that paper since he was not permitted to exercise his editorial judgment. The employer offered appellant the position of copy editor of the city desk of a newspaper in another community at the same salary, but appellant refused. The board found: “ Claimant’s personal disagreement with the employer’s policy does not absolve him from compliance, because regardless of the merits of the disagreement, the decision as to what editorial was to be published in the employer’s newspaper was entirely the employer’s * *' *. Furthermore, claimant’s refusal to carry out the employer’s direction would constitute an election by claimant not to meet a condition of his employment.” The board’s determination is amply supported by the record. On the evidence the board could find that appellant was not asked to undertake any affirmative action in conflict with his conscience, or to favor any political views not his own, since he did not sign or write any editorial to which he objected. Claimant was aware *695that he did not have complete authority to write whatever he chose in the editorial columns. As a matter of fact, most' of the editorials were not written by him. The rules governing editorial procedure were a condition of his employment, which he Was not entitled to disregard (see *Matter of Karman [Lubin],*2 A D 2d 626). Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Greenblott, Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur in memorandum by Greenblott, J.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS27701 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Angeles
Partners XIV 1999 Second Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000759859
<NAME> ANGELES PARTNERS XIV
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,132
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          27,109
<DEPRECIATION>                                (17,882)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,582
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         30,145
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (26,562)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,582
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,399
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,390
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,601
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (991)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (22.51)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>


</TABLE>
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2972 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain 16-inch variable speed scroll 

saw machines. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 23, 2006 

Mr. ISAKSON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain 16-inch variable 

speed scroll saw machines. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN 16-INCH VARIABLE SPEED SCROLL 

4 SAW MACHINES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.84.65 Certain 16-inch variable speed scroll saw 

machines (provided for in subheading 

8465.91.00) ............................................. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•S 2972 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
§ 701.212 Eligible EFRP practices. ( a ) Financial assistance may be offered to eligible persons or legal entities for EFRP practices to restore forest health and forest-related resources on eligible land.
( b ) Practice specifications must represent the minimum level of performance needed to restore the land to the applicable FSA, NRCS, Forest Service, or State forestry standard.
#### § 981.17 Inspection agency.

*Inspection agency* means the Federal-State Inspection Service or, when specifically designated, the Federal Inspection Service.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3257 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3257

  To suspend temporarily the duty on ground fault circuit interrupter 
                  receptacles of greater than 15 amps.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 26, 2006

Mr. Frist (for Mrs. Dole) introduced the following bill; which was read 
             twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on ground fault circuit interrupter 
                  receptacles of greater than 15 amps.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN GROUND FAULT CIRCUIT INTERRUPTER RECEPTACLES OF 
              GREATER THAN 15 AMPS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.85.36        Ground fault circuit    Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           interrupter                                                       31/2009          ''
                           receptacles of                                                                      .
                           greater than 15 amps
                           (provided for in
                           subheading
                           8536.30.80)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.2





IMMUNOSYN
CORPORATION





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with this annual report of Immunosyn Corporation (the “Company”) on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”), I, Douglas A.
McClain, Jr., Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby
certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
  and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company at the dates and for the periods
  indicated.





This
Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.










Date:
      March 28, 2008
            /s/ Douglas A.
      McClain, Jr.Douglas A. McClain,
      Jr.Chief
      Financial and Accounting
Officer
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 10173 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
JOSE ADAN RODRIGUEZ

- TORRES , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:17

- CR

- 77

- 1

Before HIGGINSON, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Adan Rodriguez

- Torres has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rodriguez

- Torres h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 19, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-10173 Document: 00514689272 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/19/2018No. 18

- 10173

2 presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leav e to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 18-10173 Document: 00514689272 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/19/2018
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Attendance PatternsDelinquency PreventionElementary Secondary EducationPreventionProgram DescriptionsStudent WelfareTruancyYouth Problems

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
C HIEF J USTICE

C AROLYN W RIGHT

J USTICES

D AVID L. B RIDGES

M OLLY F RANCIS

D OUGLAS S. L ANG

E LIZABETH L ANG

- M IERS

R OBERT M. F ILLMORE

L A NA M YERS

D AVID E VANS

A DA B ROWN

C RAIG S TODDART

B ILL W HITEHILL

D AVID J. S CHENCK

J ASON B OATRIGHT L ISA M ATZ

C LERK OF THE C OURT

(214) 712

- 3450

theclerk@5th.txcourts.gov

G AYLE H UMPA

B USINESS A DMINISTRATOR

(214) 712

- 3434

gayle.humpa@5th.txcour ts.gov

F ACSIMILE

(214) 745

- 1083

I NTERNET

WWW

. TXCOURTS

. GOV /5 THCOA

. ASPX 

# Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

600 C OMMERCE S TREET

, S UITE 200

D ALLAS

, T EXAS 75202

(214) 712

- 3400



## June 4, 2018

Ms. Bridget Parson

508 Grady Lane

Cedar Hill, Texas 75104

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 05

- 16

- 00060

- CV

Trial Court Case Number: CC

- 15

- 01563

- B

Style: Bridget Parson v. Becky Cole

Dear Ms. Parson :

By order dated May 11, 2018, this Court de nied your motion to recall the mandate.

Before the Court is your May 31, 2018 motion to reconsider that order. As this Court’s plenary

power has expired, the Court will take no action on your motion. See T EX



## . R. A PP



## . P. 19.1.

Respectfully,

/s/ Lisa Matz, Clerk of the Court

cc: Ms. Claudia Cano
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 55 Filed 03/29/2007 Page 1 of 1
212 Airport Drive 

www. bradfordairport.net 

September 25, 2013 

Mr. Dennis J. DeVany 

Chief, Essential Air Service Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

US Department of Transportation 

400 Seventh Street, S.W. Room 6401 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Dear Mr. DeVany: 

8RRDFDRD 

DEiiiODHL 

IRPDRT 

Lewis Run, PA 16738 

814-368-5928 EX 10 

As you are well aware, the Essential Air Service program had fundamental rule changes to determine eligibility for 

federal subsidies. One of these changes was the criterion for a minimum of 10 enplanements per service day. 

In Order 2012-9-23, Selecting Silver Airways as the carrier for a 2 year period from October 1, 2012 through 

September 30, 2014 it states: 

On page 4- Bradford and Franklin have fewer than 10 enplanements per day and Jamestown is just over 10 at 10.7. 

It also states "Silver and the communities, particularly Bradford and Franklin, must attract additional passengers, 

thus increasing enplanements to meet the 10 enplanement statutory requirement in order for them to remain eligible 

to continue receiving EAS after FY 2013, i.e. after September 30, 2013" . 

On page 5 - "The Department fully expects that the communities and Silver will work together to ensure that the 

subsidy per passenger is below $200." 

Bradford Regional Airport officials have attempted to work with Silver Airways in marketing the air service this 

past year to increase passenger traffic and there has been. limited response from Silver Airways. 

Since Silver Airways began providing service in 2008, the airport has averaged 2,791 enplanements per year. In 

the 6-year period prior to Silver Airways providing air service, the airport averaged 6,368 enplanements per year. 

Unfortunately, the relationship with Silver has resulted in a steady decl.ine in passenger traffic. On behalf of the 

Bradford Regional Airport Authority, we ask that you terminate the contract with Silver Airways immediately and 

request a right to a waiver now or in the future to secure an airline who will work with the airport and community to 

deliver adequate air service, market the air service and increase passenger traffic. 

If you have any questions, please contact me at (814) 368-5928. 

Thank you. 

Sincerely, 'Jt-cL# 

Thomas C. Frungillo, A.A.E 

Airport Director
Subpart 5148.1 - Policies and Procedures

Parent topic: Part 5148 - Value Engineering

5148.102 Policies.

(a) The Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology) has authority to

exempt individual contracts, or specific classes of contracts, from including value engineering

provisions as prescribed by FAR 48.201 and 48.202. See Appendix GG for further delegation.

(b) Refer to the Department of the Army Pamphlet 70–3, 11 March 2014, paragraph 6-14, which is

available via the Internet at https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/pdf/web/p70_3.pdf .

5148.104 Sharing arrangements.

5148.104-3 Sharing collateral savings.

(a) The head of the contracting activity shall make the determination at FAR 48.104-3(a). See

Appendix GG for further delegation.
# L_2022266DE.01002301.xml

| 13.10.2022 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 266/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2022

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 266/23

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) 2021/784 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 29. April 2021 zur Bekämpfung der Verbreitung terroristischer Online-Inhalte

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 172 vom 17. Mai 2021
  )

Seite 93, Artikel 5 Absatz 4 Buchstabe a:

Anstatt:

| „a) | eine auf objektive Faktoren — wie beispielsweise der Tatsache, dass dem Hostingdiensteanbieter in den letzten zwölf Monaten zwei oder mehr rechtskräftige Entfernungsanordnungen zugegangen sind — gestützte getroffen hat und“ |
| --- | --- |

„a)

eine auf objektive Faktoren — wie beispielsweise der Tatsache, dass dem Hostingdiensteanbieter in den letzten zwölf Monaten zwei oder mehr rechtskräftige Entfernungsanordnungen zugegangen sind — gestützte getroffen hat und“

muss es heißen:

| „a) | eine auf objektive Faktoren — wie beispielsweise der Tatsache, dass dem Hostingdiensteanbieter in den letzten zwölf Monaten zwei oder mehr rechtskräftige Entfernungsanordnungen zugegangen sind — gestützte Entscheidung getroffen hat und“. |
| --- | --- |

„a)

eine auf objektive Faktoren — wie beispielsweise der Tatsache, dass dem Hostingdiensteanbieter in den letzten zwölf Monaten zwei oder mehr rechtskräftige Entfernungsanordnungen zugegangen sind — gestützte Entscheidung getroffen hat und“.

---
1307.503 Policy.

All procurement request packages submitted by program offices to initiate a procurement action for

services shall contain a written determination by the designated requirements official that affirms

that none of the functions to be performed in the statement of work are inherently governmental.

This policy applies to all services other than personal services issued under statutory authority. If

the contracting officer determines that there are substantial questions whether the work statement

involves performance of inherently governmental functions, the contracting officer shall submit the

matter for review by Procurement Counsel. Disagreements regarding the determination shall be

resolved by the Head of Contracting Office (HCO) after consultation with counsel.

Parent topic: Subpart 1307.5 - Inherently Governmental Functions
1415.606 Agency procedures.       The contact point for the receipt and coordination of unsolicited proposals is the contracting office, which will acknowledge and review the proposal contents and determine the proper activity within the bureau/office to evaluate and process the proposal. The policy or contracting office shall acknowledge unsolicited proposals and forward each one to the processing activity in an expeditious manner. Each bureau/office shall establish procedures for receipt, reproduction and disposition of unsolicited proposals consistent with the requirements of FAR 15.6.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1415.6 - Unsolicited Proposals