alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Part 5211 - DESCRIBING AGENCY NEEDS

Subpart 5211.1 - SELECTING AND DEVELOPING REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENTS

5211.103 Market acceptance.

Subpart 5211.2 - USING AND MAINTAINING REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENTS

5211.274 Item identification and valuation requirements.

5211.274-2 Policy for item unique identification.

Subpart 5211.6 - PRIORITIES AND ALLOCATIONS

5211.603 Procedures.

Subpart 5211.1 - SELECTING AND DEVELOPING

REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENTS

5211.103 Market acceptance.

(a) The contracting officer is authorized to require offerors to demonstrate that an item meets the

market acceptance criteria.

Subpart 5211.2 - USING AND MAINTAINING

REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENTS

5211.274 Item identification and valuation requirements.

5211.274-2 Policy for item unique identification.

(a) See Annex 4 for STRL deviations applicable hereto.

(b)(2)(i)(A) Submit the determination and findings under DFARS 211.274-2(b)(2)(i)(A) via DASN(P)

by email at RDAJ&As.fct @navy.mil with the subject “[Activity Name] DFARS 211.274-2(b)(2)(i)(A) –

D&F – Exception to Item Unique Identification Marking.”
Subpart 5211.6 - PRIORITIES AND ALLOCATIONS

5211.603 Procedures.

(b) In accordance with DOD Manual 4400.1-M, DON activities shall, under the Defense Priorities and

Allocations System (DPAS):

(1) Use the DX rating for:

(A) Program 390;

(B) Integrated Ballistic Missile Defense System;

(C) Presidential Helicopter Programs (VH-92-A, VH-3D and VH-60N);

(D) Fleet Ballistic Missile Weapon Systems, Trident System including the Cruise Missile

Submarines/SSGN, and submarines with the Trident II SWS Missile - Ohio Class Submarines/SSBN,

Columbia Class Submarines (formerly Ohio Replacement Class)/SSBN (X), and all future submarines

that carry the Trident Missile;

(E) Program 341;

(F) E-6B Command, Control and Communications Aircraft Program;

(G) Space-Based Infrared System High; Intercontinental Ballistic Missile;

(H) Minuteman II;

(I) B-2 Stealth Bomber;

(J) Presidential Aircraft (VC-25A and VC-25B Presidential Aircraft Recapitalization).

(f) HCAs are responsible for establishing procedures for rated orders.

(g) Each Contracting Activity has an assigned DPAS Officer to provide guidance and resolve

questions associated with DPAS. Contact the Contracting Activity’s Policy office for DPAS point of

contact information .
5615.001 Definitions.

(Revised February 2014)

(a) Business Clearance (BC):

(1)The purpose of the BC for competitive acquisitions is to obtain approval from the appropriate

approval authority to award without discussion or begin discussions.

(2)The purpose of the BC for non-competitive acquisitions, negotiated modifications, and delivery or

task orders is to obtain the approval to begin negotiations.

(b) Contract Clearance:

(1) The Contract Clearance is the approval of the negotiated business arrangement. The Contract

Clearance review is accomplished after completion of negotiations and prior to the Contracting

Officer signing the contract. Contract clearance shall be accomplished prior to sending the contract

to the Source Selection Authority for the final SSA decision.

(2) The requirement to obtain Contract Clearance may be waived if requested at the time the PreNegotiation portion of the BCM is submitted for review and no substantial changes are made to the

original negotiation objective.

Parent topic: Part 5615 - CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION
U.S Department of Transportation, Docket Operation 

West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Aerial Shots is writing pursuant to the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Public Law 

112-95 FEB. 14, 2012, Section 333 and the procedures contained within 14 C.F.R.ll, be exempt 

From the Federal Aviation Regulation as specified and seek exemption from the requirements of 

14 C.F.R. §§ 61.113{a) & (b), 91.7{a),91.121, 91.151{b), 91.405{a),91.407{a)(l), 91.409{a)(l) & (a)(2), 

And 91.417{a) & (b), to operate an Unmanned Aircraft System pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA 

Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 {FMRA). 

This exemption request will permit Aerial Shots as the owner of Unmanned Aircraft System's {UAS) 

For the commercial purpose of conducting aerial video and photography of Real Estate, perform 

Home and or business exterior inspections, agricultural inspections, and general photography. 

Aerial Shots owns UAS vehicles, consisting of Dji Phantom 3's and their use will be for commercial 

Photography and video for hire, namely, Real Estate Photography, home and or business exterior 

Inspections, wedding and events, increase public knowledge of UAS and promote safe UAS operations, 

Land and survey appraisals, and agricultural assessments on local farms as needed. 

We have experienced pilots with the above mentioned aircraft and have over 10 years of experience 

In radio control aircraft . The above mentioned aircraft are GPS assisted for location based information, 

And include a "Return to Home" safety feature in case of signal loss. We will perform all pre-flight and 

Post-flight checks, and system/vehicle maintenance. All flights will be L.O.S. And will have a spotter as 

needed. All flights will maintain less than 400' A.G.L. the Phantom 3 weighs three pounds. 

They are battery operated, which are quieter as not to disrupt surrounding neighbors and businesses. 

The aircrafts also have a safety feature in the software which will not allow it to spool up the motors 

if within a certain distance of Class A/B/C, etc ... Airports. 

The use of these aircraft is financially viable as the cost to the consumer is much less than hiring a full 

size aircraft and pilot. The aircraft are also safer and can access areas a full size aircraft can't. 

For home inspections, they also allow a total roof inspection without the need of ladders and harnesses, 

which also creates a safer and less costly option to the client. 

James H. Brown 

Owner 

Aerial Shots 

1306 Chippawa Ln. 

Pasadena, TX. 77504 

(713}542-3256
§ 955.142 Delinquent assessments. ( a ) Each handler shall submit assessments to the Vidalia Onion Committee on a monthly basis for each month during the fiscal period in which they made shipments. Each such assessment shall be paid to the Committee not later than 5 p.m. on the tenth day of each month following the month in which any shipments were made. Should the tenth day of the month fall on a weekend or holiday, assessments are due by the first business day following the tenth day of the month.
( b ) Each handler shall pay interest of 1.5 percent per month on any assessments levied pursuant to § 955.42 and on any accrued unpaid interest beginning the day immediately after the date the monthly assessments were due, until the delinquent handler's assessments, plus applicable interest, have been paid in full. In addition to the interest charge, the Committee shall impose a late payment charge on any handler whose assessment payment has not been received within 10 days of the due date. The late payment charge shall be 10 percent of the late assessments.
[71 FR 34509, June 15, 2006, as amended at 76 FR 37620, June 28, 2011; 78 FR 28120, May 14, 2013]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6525

MEDAD EL MUHAMMAD,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior

District Judge. (CA-03-1307-1)

Submitted: August 18, 2005 Decided: August 25, 2005

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Medad El Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Andrew Witmer, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Medad El Muhammad, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the

district court’s order denying relief on his petition under 28

U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Muhammad has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny his motions for appointment of

counsel and for a certificate of appealability, and we dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-09-333-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF C.B., C.B.,

AND C.B., MINOR CHILDREN

------------

FROM THE 325TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION

1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

We have considered appellant’s request to “remove this case from [our]

docket and vacate the appeal.” It is the court’s opinion that appellant’s request

should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.

42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MCCOY, LIVINGSTON, and MEIER, JJ.

DELIVERED: January 14, 2010

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Exhibit 33.2
                                  ------------


          ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA



The Bank of New York and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N. A.
(collectively, the "Company") provides this platform-level assessment of
compliance with the servicing criteria specified in Item 1122(d) of Regulation
AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Management has determined that the following servicing criteria are applicable
in regards to the following servicing platform for the following period:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially
required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential
mortgage-backed securities and other mortgage-related asset-backed securities
issued on or after January 1, 2006 (and like-kind transactions issued prior to
January 1, 2006) for which the Company provides trustee, securities
administration, paying agent or custodial services. The platform includes like
kind transactions for which the Company provided trustee, securities
administrator, paying agent or custodial services as a result of the Company's
acquisition as of October 1, 2006 of portions of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s
corporate trust business, including structured finance agency and trust
transactions.

Applicable Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d), to the extent required by the related transaction agreements as to
any transaction, except for the following criteria: 1122 (d) (1)(ii), (iii),
(iv), (4) (iv), (v), (vi), (vii), (viii), (ix), (x), (xi), (xii) and (xiii).

Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2006.

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the
following assessment of compliance in respect of the Applicable Servicing
Criteria:

o  The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria.

o  The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

o  As of December 31, 2006 and for the Period, the Company was in material
compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.



                                      1
<PAGE>


Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has
      issued an attestation report with respect to the Company's foregoing
assessment of compliance.



      The Bank of New York                    The Bank of New York
      The Bank of New York Trust              The Bank of New York Trust
         Company, N.A.                           Company, N.A.


      /s/ Robert L. Griffin                   /s/ Patrick J. Tadie
      ---------------------------             ---------------------------
      Robert L. Griffin                       Patrick J. Tadie
      Authorized Signer                       Authorized Signer


March 1, 2007



                                      2
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of First Community Financial Corporation, (the Company) for the period ended September
30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Richard R. Leitzel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the
Report.



|Date: November 13, 2003 |  | By: |  | /s/ Richard R. Leitzel                     
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------
|                        |  |     |  | Richard R. Leitzel, Chief Financial Officer
EX-10.9



 Exhibit 10.9 

FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE 

ALPHATEC HOLDINGS, INC. 

2016 EMPLOYMENT INDUCEMENT AWARD PLAN 

This Fourth Amendment (this “Amendment”) to the Alphatec Holdings, Inc. 2016 Employment Inducement Award Plan (as amended and/or restated to
date, the “Plan”) is made and adopted by Alphatec Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), a corporation organized under the laws of State of Delaware. 

 

	 	1.	Section 3(a) of the Plan is hereby amended to read as follows: 

  

	 	(a)	The number of Shares which may be issued from time to time pursuant to this Plan shall be 3,150,000 shares of Common Stock. 

  

	 	2.	This Amendment is effective as of March 6, 2018. 

  

	 	3.	This Amendment shall be and is hereby incorporated in and forms a part of the Plan. All other terms and provisions of the Plan shall remain unchanged except as specifically modified herein. The Plan, as amended by this
Amendment, is hereby ratified and confirmed. 

 * * * * * * * * 

I hereby certify that the foregoing Amendment was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company on March 6, 2018. 

 

					
	ALPHATEC HOLDINGS, INC.
		
		 	/s/ Patrick S. Miles
		 	Name:	 	Patrick S. Miles
		 	Its:	 	Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
National Property Investors 8 1998 Second Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified 
in its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000763701
<NAME> NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS 8
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998   
<CASH>                                           2,309
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          30,218
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,675   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,994   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         10,892     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0     
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,410    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,994    
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,432    
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,250    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 463    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       182     
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.01<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3450 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Oxirane, 2,2′-[(3,3′,5,5′-tetramethyl[1,1′- 

biphenyl]-4,4′-diyl)bis(oxymethylene)]bis- (9Cl). 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 6, 2006 

Mr. REID introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Oxirane, 2,2′-[(3,3′,5,5′- 

tetramethyl[1,1′-biphenyl]-4,4′- 

diyl)bis(oxymethylene)]bis- (9Cl). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. OXIRANE, 2,2′-[(3,3′,5,5′-TETRAMETHYL[1,1′- 

4 BIPHENYL]-4,4′- 

5 DIYL)BIS(OXYMETHYLENE)]BIS- (9Cl). 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•S 3450 IS 

‘‘ 9902.29.12 Oxirane, 2,2′-[(3,3′,5,5′-tetramethyl[1,1′- 

biphenyl]-4,4′-diyl)bis(oxymethylene)]bis- 

(9Cl) (CAS No. 85954–11–6) (provided 

for in subheading 2902.90.90) ................ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
JIM R. WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE

MIKE WILLSON

JUSTICE

JOHN M. BAILEY

JUSTICE 

# Court of Appeals

Eleventh District of Texas

100 WEST MAIN STREET, SUITE 300

P. O. BOX 271

EASTLAND, TEXAS 76448 SHERRY WILLIAMSON

CLERK

TELE: 254/629-2638

FAX: 254/629-2191

sherry.williamson@txcourts.gov

www.txcourts.gov/11thcoa

August 3, 2017

Jennifer A. Habert, District Attorney

Baylor County

101 S. Washington Street

Seymour, TX 76380

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * Carl Lopez Anchondo

TDCJ #00646402

Stringfellow Unit

1200 FM 655

Rosharon, TX 77583

RE: Appellate Case Number: 11-17-00195-CR

Trial Court Case Number: 3493

Style: Carl Lopez Anchondo v. The State of Texas

The Court has this day DISMISSED the appeal in the above cause.

Copies of the Court's opinion and judgment are attached.

Appellant is advised that a Petition for Discretionary Review may be filed with the Clerk,

Court of Criminal Appeals, Austin, Texas. No copy is required for the Eleventh Court of

Appeals.

Respectfully yours,

Sherry Williamson, Clerk

cc: Bobby Burnett, Judge (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Lisa Cypert, District Clerk (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Kelly Moore, Administrative Judge (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,119,022
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,511,659
<ALLOWANCES>                                    39,868
<INVENTORY>                                     51,742
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,039,077
<PP&E>                                       5,786,833
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,134,112
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,273,211
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,489,071
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         61
<COMMON>                                       105,283
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,363,570
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,273,211
<SALES>                                      6,269,251
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,269,251
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,018,076
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              51,886
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,199,289
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,199,289
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,263,254
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23


</TABLE>