alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
You are here: EPA Home Products & Publications TRAP

The Toxicity Relationship Analysis Program (TRAP) fits a symmetric, sigmoidal effects versus

exposure relationship to toxicity test data. It will analyze binary (e.g., survival) or continuous (e.g.,

growth) biological effect variables as a function of any one-dimensional exposure variable. It will

provide both best estimates and confidence limits for the parameters of the relationship and for the

values of the exposure variable eliciting user-specified levels of effect. A Windows user interface

provides for (a) entering data manually, from ASCII data files, and by copying from other software,

(b) specifying options for the analysis and observing results, and (c) printing results and exporting

them to other software. The program is a single executable file compatible with any Windows

version and is accompanied by a help file containing operating instructions and information on the

nature and performance of this analysis methodology.

TRAP version 1.30a (2.0 MB zip file) includes: "TRAP1.30aAbout.pdf" with installation and other

general information about TRAP, "TRAP1.30Help.pdf" containing the program documentation, the

TRAP program "TRAP1.30a.exe", and two example datafiles to check program operation. For further

information, please contact Russell Erickson (E-mail: erickson.russell@epa.gov or Telephone:

218-529-5157). If you download this software, please send Russell your email address, so he can

notify you of any updates, including bug-fixes. (Note: TRAP version 1.30a corrects an output error in

version 1.30 as described in the about file but is otherwise unchanged from version 1.30)

Mid-Continent Ecology Division

https://archive.epa.gov/med/med_archive_03/web/html/trap.html

Last updated on 2/21/2016

TRAP | Research | US EPA https://archive.epa.gov/med/med_archive_03/web/html/trap.html

1 of 1 4/20/2016 3:30 PM
#### PEOPLE v. FEDERAL BANK OF NEW YORK.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 12, 1906.)

Proceedings by the people of the state of New York against the Federal Bank of New York.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs. Order filed.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. C. James Lombardi, Jr., Appellant, v. Harold W. Follette, as Warden of Green Haven Prison, Respondent.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated June 21, 1966, dismissing a writ of habeas corpus, reversed, on the law, without costs, and proceeding remitted to the Special Term for the purpose of (a) holding a hearing *de novo;*(b) assigning counsel to represent relator on such hearing; and (e) making a determination *de novo*on the merits. No questions of fact have been considered. Respondent states in his brief that he does not object to this disposition for the reason that relator’s request at Special Term for assignment of counsel was denied over his objection. We have held that assignment of counsel is necessary in cases such as this *(People ex rel. Slade*v. *Follette,*26 A D 2d 823). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hopkins and Munder, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT
14.1





FEDERAL
SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT, INC.





CODE
OF ETHICS





FOR





CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER, CHIEF


ACCOUNTING
OFFICER OR CONTROLLER AND PERSONS PERFORMING


SIMILAR
FUNCTIONS





General
Philosophy


The
honesty, integrity and sound judgment of the Chief Executive Officer, Chief
Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer or Controller and persons performing
similar functions (collectively the “Principal Officers”) of Federal Sports
& Entertainment, Inc. (the “Company”) is fundamental to our reputation and
success.  The professional and ethical conduct of the Principal
Officers is essential to the proper functioning and success of the
Company.





Applicability


This Code
of Ethics shall apply to the Company’s Principal Officers.





Standards
of Conduct


To the
best of their knowledge and ability, the Principal Officers shall:





·
            act
      with honesty and integrity, including the ethical handling of actual or
      apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional
      relationships;





·
            provide
      full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in reports and
      documents that the Company files with, or submits to, the Securities and
      Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and in other public communications made by
      the Company;





·
            comply
      with applicable governmental laws, rules and
  regulations;





·
            promote
      the prompt internal reporting of violations of this Code of Ethics to the
      Company’s board of directors and outside legal
  counsel;





·
            respect
      the confidentiality of information acquired in the course of
      employment;





·
            maintain
      the skills necessary and relevant to the Company’s needs;
    and





·
            proactively
      promote ethical and honest behavior among employees of the Company and its
      subsidiaries.


1


EXHIBIT
14.1





All
Principal Officers are expected to adhere to the Company’s Code of
Ethics.  Any violation of this Code of Ethics will be subject to
appropriate discipline, up to and including dismissal from the Company and
prosecution under the law.  The board of directors shall have
responsibility for administration of this Code of Ethics and shall have the sole
and absolute discretionary authority to approve any deviation or waiver from
this Code of Ethics for Principal Officers.  In the event that a
waiver of, modification of and/or change to this Code of Ethics is approved and
granted, then the notice of the waiver, modification, and/or change shall be
disclosed as may be required by SEC rules or the rules of any exchange on which
the securities of the Company are then trading.


2
#### § 905.87 Derogation.

Nothing contained in this part is, or shall be construed to be in derogation or in modification of the rights of the Secretary or of the United States (a) to exercise any powers granted by the act or otherwise, or (b) in accordance with such powers, to act in the premises whenever such action is deemed advisable.
#### § 981.92 Amendments.

Amendments to this subpart may be proposed, from time to time, by any person or by the Board.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 06377

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

06377\06377_Completeness Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

06377\06377_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 06377\06377_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06377\06377_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06377\06377_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06377\06377_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06377\06377_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06377\6377_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

06377\Certification Statement Plant ID_06377.pdf Plant certification statement

x 06377\Supporting Documentation\06377_Big Bend Water Balance PFD.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Subpart 736.5—Contract Clauses

Parent topic: PART 736—CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS

736.570 Disability standards in construction contracts.

Contracting officers must insert the clause at 752.236–70, Standards for Accessibility for the

Disabled in USAID Construction Contracts, in all solicitations and contracts for construction or

renovations made using program funds.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Isdera North America, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jing Jiang, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: March 29, 2010





/s/ Jing JiangJing Jiang, Chief Executive Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 11, 2019

No. 04-18-00483-CR

Amber Don CEARLEY,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR1792

Honorable Dick Alcala, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s second motion for an extension of time to file the appellant’s brief is granted. 

We order appellant’s brief due March 25, 2019. Counsel is advised that no further extensions of 

time will be granted absent a timely motion that (1) demonstrates extraordinary circumstances 

justifying further delay, (2) advises the court of the efforts counsel has expended in preparing the 

brief, and (3) provides the court reasonable assurance that the brief will be completed and filed 

by the requested extended deadline. The court does not generally consider a heavy work 

schedule to be an extraordinary circumstance.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 11th day of February, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
|                                            |
|--------------------------------------------|
|                                            |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|                                       |   |   |   |   |   |
|                                       |   |   |   |   |   |
|                                       |   |   |   |   |   |
|                                       | For the Year Ended December 31, |
|                                       | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 |
| Fixed charges:                             |   |   |   |   |   |
| Interest expense                           | 3,730,768 |  | 3,382,543 |  | 923,350 |  | 1,028,841 |  | 974,369 |  |
| Total Fixed charges                        | 3,730,768 |  | 3,382,543 |  | 923,350 |  | 1,028,841 |  | 974,369 |  |
|                                       |   |   |   |   |   |
| Earnings available for fixed charges:      |   |   |   |   |   |
| Pre-tax income                             | 6,068,078 |  | 6,412,406 |  | 9,439,209 |  | 4,122,161 |  | 3,686,859 |  |
| Add: Fixed charges                         | 3,730,768 |  | 3,382,543 |  | 923,350 |  | 1,028,841 |  | 974,369 |  |
| Total Earnings available for fixed charges | 9,798,846 |  | 9,794,949 |  | 10,318,832 |  | 5,151,002 |  | 4,661,228 |  |
|                                       |   |   |   |   |   |
| Earnings to fixed charges                  | 2.63 |  | 2.90 |  | 11.22 |  | 5.01 |  | 4.78 |  |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | (1) |   |
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Viking Minerals Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles Irizarry,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of July
14, 2011.


/s/ Charles Irizarry
---------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Page 1 of 2 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

TONY GARCIA, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. Case No. 5:21-cv-22-RV-MJF 

WELLPATH MEDICAL, et al.,

 Defendants.

 / 

O R D E R

 This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report 

and Recommendation dated May 26, 2021 (ECF No. 17). Plaintiff was furnished a 

copy of the Report and Recommendation and was afforded an opportunity to file 

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), which he did 

(ECF No. 18). Having reviewed his objections de novo, I have determined that the 

Report and Recommendation should be adopted. 

 Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 

 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 17) is 

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 

 2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 

1915A(b)(1) and 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), for maliciousness and abuse of the judicial 

process. 

Case 5:21-cv-00022-RV-MJF Document 20 Filed 06/10/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2 

 3. The clerk of court shall close this case file. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 10th day of June, 2021. 

 /s/ Roger Vinson / 

 ROGER VINSON 

 SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:21-cv-00022-RV-MJF Document 20 Filed 06/10/21 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                            1878
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       26
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1904
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1904
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              103
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        1801
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1904
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 14828
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      481
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   253
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 177
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  13917
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              13917
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (255)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     13662
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   237.91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   237.91
        

</TABLE>
Subpart 5632.70 - ELECTRONIC

SUBMISSION AND PROCESSING OF

PAYMENT REQUESTS AND RECEIVING

REPORTS

(Updated June 2018)

See DCG for WAWF Alternate Payment Instructions.

HQ, United States Special Operations Command

Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L-K)

SOFARS 5632

February 2007

Parent topic: Part 5632 - CONTRACT FINANCING
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF RESPONSE ONCOLOGY, INC. FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE
30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,133
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,329
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (2,443)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,783
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,534
<PP&E>                                          15,607
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (10,425)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 162,682
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           59,061
<BONDS>                                         44,097
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         27
<COMMON>                                           120
<OTHER-SE>                                      69,413
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   162,682
<SALES>                                         32,627
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,627
<CGS>                                           16,367
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,596
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   392
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 721
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,303
<INCOME-TAX>                                       875
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,428
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,428
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.12
        

</TABLE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Meetingminutes**** 
SuDocNumber:HE20.7048:
ItemNumber:0504-W-06(online)
CGPsystem Number:000594810
 
2000- Dec._14-15,_2000.pdf
 
2001- Apr.       25-26, 2001.pdfDec.       10, 2001.pdfDec.       10-11, 2001 Approved Recommendations.pdfDec.       10-11, 2001.pdf
 
2002- Sept.       20-21, 2002.pdf
 
2003- Dec.       8-9, 2003.pdfJan.       23, 2003.pdfMar.       13-14, 2003.pdf
 
2004- Dec.       6-7, 2004.pdfJune       16-17, 2004.pdfMay       13, 2004.pdf
 
2005- Aug.       22, 2005.pdfJune       15-16, 2005.pdf
 
2006- Feb.       16-17, 2006.pdfSept.       26-27, 2006.pdf
 
2007- Feb.       28-Mar. 1, 2007.pdfOct.       24, 2007.pdfSept.       12-13, 2007.pdf
 
 **
DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY 

BOARD 

May 30, 1997 

Board staff members Ralph Arcaro and Mark Sautman were on site May 27-29 to review the status of 

plutonium stabilization activities at the Plutonium Finishing Plant (PFP). 

A. Plutonium Reclamation Facility (PRF) Explosion Recovery: Due to several cases of poor work planning and 

poor preparation, facility personnel and investigation team members were unable to enter Room 40 of PRF this 

week. although the investigation team has given high priority to obtaining a sample from tank A109 and 

detailed photographs of the room, these activities have not been done. The investigation team, as well as outside 

agencies have raised a number of questions regarding the adequacy of the emergency response, medical 

response, and outside agency notification in the early hours after the explosion. DOE-RL has commissioned a 

second investigation team to look into these deficiencies thus allowing the original team to focus on the 

technical details of events that led up to the explosion. 

B. Canister Storage Building (CSB) Construction: On May 23, 1997, Duke Engineering & Services Hanford 

(DESH) issued a letter to MOWAT, the CSB constructor, explaining the DESH expectations for resumption of 

construction. The letter lists nine corrective action that should be taken by MOWAT to correct deficiencies 

identified by the investigation into the worker injury at the CSB construction site. As MOWAT completes these 

nine corrective actions, DESH intends to release portions of the construction in a phased approach. 

Concurrently, DOE-RL is finishing its investigation and expects to issue a draft report next week. DOE-RL did 

not issue a formal stop-work order of its own, but is closely monitoring the recovery efforts of Fluor Daniel 

Hanford, DESH and MOWAT. 

C. Staff Review of 94-1 Activities at PFP: Mr. Ogg accompanied the Board staff in a review of plutonium 

stabilization activities at PFP. Plutonium solution stabilization using the vertical denitration calciner, originally 

scheduled to start in June 1997, will not start before October 1997 under the current facility planning. This 

"key" milestone from the 94-1 Implementation Plan is delayed due to both technical and budgetary reasons. The 

Board staff pointed out that formal notification of these facts has not been forthcoming, and DOE committed to 

drafting correspondence that will address this issue. Other observations from the review will be reported in the 

staff trip report. 

cc: 

Board Members 

TO: G. W. Cunningham, Technical Director 

FROM: P.F. Gubanc & D.G. Ogg, Hanford Site Representatives 

SUBJECT: Activity Report for Week Ending May 30, 1997
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 332 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 332

 To prohibit the retirement of F-117 Nighthawk stealth attack aircraft 
                        during fiscal year 2006.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 9, 2005

 Mr. Domenici (for himself and Mr. Bingaman) introduced the following 
   bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the retirement of F-117 Nighthawk stealth attack aircraft 
                        during fiscal year 2006.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON RETIREMENT OF F-117 NIGHTHAWK STEALTH ATTACK 
              AIRCRAFT.

    No F-117 Nighthawk stealth attack aircraft in use by the Air Force 
during fiscal year 2005 may be retired during fiscal year 2006.
                                 <all>
```