alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.2



CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



I,
Marty Dobbins, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | (1) | the
Annual Report of Amazing Energy Oil and Gas, Co. on Form 10-K for the annual period ended July 31, 2019 (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | information
contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Amazing
Energy Oil and Gas, Co.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date:
    November 12, 2019 | By: | /s/
    Marty Dobbins                                              | 
|--------------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------ | 
|                            |     | Marty
    Dobbins                                                  | 
|                            |     | Title:
    Chief Financial Officer                                 | 
|                            |     | (Principal
    Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) | 
|                            |     |                                                                    | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Amazing
Energy Oil and Gas, Co. and will be retained by Amazing Energy Oil and Gas, Co. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.



This
certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall
not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by Amazing Energy Oil and Gas, Co. for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to
be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the
extent that Amazing Energy Oil and Gas, Co. specifically incorporates it by reference.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Richard Gray, Appellant, v. Ross E. Herold, as Superintendent of Dannemora State Hospital, Respondent.

Motion to dismiss appeal as academic granted, appellant having been discharged from Dannemora State Hospital. (See *People ex rel. Pylypcuk*v. *Herold,*25 A D 2d 690.) Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur.
#### § 948.75 Expenses.

Each area committee is authorized to incur such expenses as the Secretary may find are reasonable and likely to be incurred during each fiscal period for its maintenance and functioning, and for purposes determined to be appropriate for administration of this part. Handlers shall share expenses upon the basis of a fiscal period. Each handler's share of such expenses shall be proportionate to the ratio between the total quantity of potatoes handled by him as the first handler thereof during a fiscal period and the total quantity of potatoes handled by all handlers as first handlers thereof during such fiscal period.
Case 2:06-cv-00674-WKW-TFM Document 10 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00674-WKW-TFM Document 10 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00674-WKW-TFM Document 10 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 3 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00674-WKW-TFM Document 10 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 4 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00674-WKW-TFM Document 10 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 5 of 5
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                     143,467
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                               60,986
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0  
<INVENTORY>                                      0  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           202,855
<PP&E>                                     126,342
<DEPRECIATION>                              74,205
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             256,590
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      326,473
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                   130,363
<OTHER-SE>                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               256,590
<SALES>                                     86,334
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            86,334
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           126,449
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (40,115)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (40,115)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (40,115)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (.01)  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.01)  
        

</TABLE>
IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

WILLIAM D. BOWDEN, *

Plaintiff, *

vs. * CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06-CV-665

MISSION PETROLEUM CARRIERS, et al., *

Defendants. *

DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF FILING DISCOVERY

Defendants Mission Petroleum Carriers and Antonio Martinez Navarro hereby give notice

of filing the following discovery:

1. Defendant Antonio Navarro’s Responses to Plaintiff’s Consolidated Discovery Requests;

2. Defendant Antonio Navarro’s Responses to Plaintiff’s First Requests for Admissions; 

3. Defendant Mission Petroleum Carriers’ Responses to Plaintiff’s Second Request for

Admissions; and

4. Defendant’s Mission Petroleum Carriers’ Responses to Plaintiff’s Third Request for

Admissions.

Respectfully submitted on the 3rd day of May, 2007.

/s/ Caroline T. Pryor 

VINCENT A. NOLETTO, JR. 

(NOLEV3868)

CAROLINE T. PRYOR (PRYOC2802)

Attorney for Defendants

CARR ALLISON

6251 Monroe Street, Suite 200

Daphne, Alabama 36526

(251)626-9340 telephone

(251)626-8928 facsimile

ctp@carrallison.com

Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 46 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have on this 3rd of May, 2007, served a copy of the foregoing pleading

upon all counsel of record via the Court’s electronic filing system.

James Bodin, Esq.

McPhillips, Shinbaum & Gill, LLP

P.O. Box 64

Montgomery, AL 36101-0064

/s/ Caroline T. Pryor 

CAROLINE T. PRYOR

Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 46 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

** **

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MAI Systems Corporation (the Company) for theperiod ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William B. Kretzmer, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that :

 

1.               TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.               Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: May 14, 2004 | By:                     | /s/ William B. Kretzmer |
|--------------------|-------------------------|-------------------------|
|               | William B. Kretzmer     |
|               | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Regulatory Commission

# AGENCY:

Postal Regulatory Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Postal Regulatory Commission published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         of November 30, 2010 concerning an appeal of the closing of the Graves Mill, Virginia post office. The procedural schedule that appeared after ordering paragraph number 5 contained two incorrect entries. This document corrects those entries.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel, at 202-789-6824 or                         *stephen.sharfman@prc.gov.*

## Correction

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of November 30, 2010, in FR Doc. 2010-30075, on page 74109, in the table that appears following ordering paragraph number 5 in the third column of text, correct the Procedural Schedule by (i) deleting the entry for December 13, 2010 in the first column of the table in its entirety and deleting the corresponding description in the second column of the table; and (ii) with respect to the December 27, 2010 entry in the first column of the                               ( print page 77922)                            table, deleting the corresponding entry in the second column of the table in its entirety and replacing it with the following description: Deadline for Petitioner's Form 61 or initial brief in support of petition (                        *see*39 CFR 3001.115(a) and (b)).                    

Dated: December 9, 2010.

Shoshana M. Grove,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-31294 Filed 12-13-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P
**EXHIBIT
31.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION**
 
 
 I, Taffy
J. Williams, Ph.D., President and Chief Executive Officer, certify
that:
 
 1.  I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of IMCOR Pharmaceutical
Co.;
 
 2.  Based on
my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.  Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.  The small
business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:
 
 (a)  Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiary, is made known to the company by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 
 (b)  Evaluated
the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report its conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c)  Disclosed
in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent
fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial
reporting; and
 
 5.  The small
business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business
issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 
 (a)  All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
 
 (b)  Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting.
 
 /s/ Taffy
      J. WilliamsTaffy J. Williams, Ph.D.Chief Executive OfficerDate:****May
      16, 2005
Petitioner originally filed his petition on June 13, 2006 in the United States District Court for the 1

Northern District of Florida. By order entered July 27, 2006 the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Florida directed that Petitioner’s habeas petition be transferred to this court. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

 _______________________________

HOWARD GLENN TOOLE, #C 917683 *

Petitioner, *

 v. * 1:06-CV-696-MHT

JAMES MCDONOUGH, et al., * 

Respondents. *

 _______________________________

O R D E R

The court received the above-captioned petition for filing on August 9, 2006. A 1

review of the petition reflects that Petitioner seeks to challenge the judgments of more than

one state court. Specifically, Petitioner asserts claims for relief against judgments entered

against him by both the Circuit Court for Coffee County, Alabama, and the Circuit Court for

Pike County, Alabama. Petitioner may not challenge the judgment(s) of separate state courts

in a single petition. 

Petitioner is advised that, pursuant to Rule 2(d), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases

in the United States District Courts, “[a] petition shall be limited to the assertion of a claim

for relief against the judgment or judgments of a single state court (sitting in a county or

other appropriate political subdivision). If a petitioner desires to attack the validity of the

judgments of two or more state courts under which he is in custody or may be subject to

future custody, as the case may be, he shall do so by separate petitions. See also Rule 2(e),

Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 8 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 1 of 2
Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Court. 

 Accordingly, the Clerk is DIRECTED to return to Petitioner his application for

habeas corpus relief (Doc. No. 1) and retain a copy of the petition in the instant file. See

Rule 2(e), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. 

It is further

ORDERED that on or before August 29, 2006, Petitioner shall file a corrected

petition in the above-captioned action which challenges only the judgment(s) entered

against him by the Circuit Court for Coffee County, Alabama, on a form for use in filing

a habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. See Local Rule 9.1 (requiring pro se

litigants to utilize court's forms). Petitioner’s original petition shall be superseded by this

amended petition. That means Petitioner shall no longer rely on the original petition. 

The Clerk is DIRECTED to send to Petitioner a form for use in filing a habeas corpus

application under § 2254. Petitioner is advised that his failure to file an amended petition

within the prescribed time and in accordance with the directives contained in this order will

result in a Recommendation that this case be dismissed for failure to obey the orders of the

court.

Done this day 14 day of August 2006. th

/s/ Vanzetta Penn McPherson

VANZETTA PENN MCPHERSON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 8 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 2 of 2
Outcomes Assessed by the La Crosse Drug Prevention Program Analysis Project

file:///C|/Users/mames/Desktop/test/lps110655/outcomes.html[9/23/2014 11:15:45 AM]

ONDCP Seal

Prevention

Strategies

Principles

Research

Programs

Resources

Drug-Free

 Workplace

Policy

Outcomes Assessed by the La Crosse Drug

Prevention Program Analysis Project

I. Program Success and Viability Indicators (telephone follow-up

survey)

A. Program Effectiveness (as reported by program personnel)

B. Program Status (as reported by program personnel)

1. Continuation

2. Scope

3. Institutionalization

II. Measures of Substance Use and Use-Related Variables (Core

Survey pre and posttest percentages)

A. Demographics

1. Freshmen

2. Sophomores

3. Juniors

4. Seniors

5. Graduate Students

6. Other

7. Females

8. Off-Campus Students

B. AOD Use

1. Alcohol Use (30 day prevalence)

2. Binge Drinking (within past two weeks)

3. Marijuana Use (30 day prevalence)

4. Other Illegal Drug Use (30 day prevalence)

C. Use-Related Consequences

1. Public Misconduct

2. Personal Problems

D. Program-Related Perceptions

1. AOD Policy Awareness

2. AOD Program Awareness

3. Perception of Campus Concern for Prevention

E. Student Perceptions and Opinions Regarding Other Student

AOD Use

1. Others' Use of Alcohol (once a week or more)

2. Others' Illegal Drug Use (at least once a week)
Outcomes Assessed by the La Crosse Drug Prevention Program Analysis Project

file:///C|/Users/mames/Desktop/test/lps110655/outcomes.html[9/23/2014 11:15:45 AM]

3. Student Preference for No Alcohol at Parties

4. Student Preference for No Illegal Drug Use at Parties

F. Other Relevant Variables

1. Percent of Students Working

2. Percent of Students Volunteering

Return to Selected Articles

PRIVACY POLICY | DISCLAIMER

Last Updated: March 4, 2002
#### § 927.120 Pears for charitable or byproduct purposes.

Pears which do not meet the requirements of the then effective grade, size, or quality regulations shall not be shipped or handled for consumption by any charitable institution or for distribution by any relief agency or for conversion into any by-product, unless there first shall have been delivered to the manager of the Fresh Pear Committee a certificate executed by the intended receiver and user of said pears showing, to the manager's satisfaction, that said pears actually will be used for one or more of the aforesaid purposes.

[70 FR 59625, Oct. 13, 2005, as amended at 71 FR 7676, Feb. 14, 2006]
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of First Community Financial Corporation, (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Richard R. Leitzel,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.



|                        |  |     |  |                                            
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------
|Date: November 13, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/ Richard R. Leitzel                     
|                        |  |     |  | Richard R. Leitzel, Chief Financial Officer
|                        |  |     |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
1

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION, 

B. B. a minor, by and )

through his mother and next friend, )

OWENA KNOWLES, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No.: 3:06cv715-MHT

)

PAWN CITY, INC.; INTERSTATE )

ARMS CORPORATION; NORINCO )

a/k/a CHINA NORTH INDUSTRIES )

CORPORATION, QIQIHAR HAWK )

INDUSTRIES, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

MOTION TO EXTEND SCHEDULING ORDER

COMES NOW the plaintiff and hereby moves this Court for an Order 

extending all deadlines in the Scheduling Order entered by the Court on September 

11, 2006. Plaintiff requests that all deadlines contained therein be extended for 

sixty (60) days. As grounds therefore, plaintiff states as follows:

1. This lawsuit was removed to District Court on August 10, 2006. On September 

11, 2006, the Court entered a Scheduling Order setting a discovery deadline of 

April 20, 2007, December 1, 2006 and a deadline of May 4, 2007 to file dispositive 

motions.

2. Defendant Norinco has not yet responded to discovery propounded on or about 

November 27, 2006. Counsel for Defendant Norinco has indicated that the delay is 

due to the language barrier, as said Defendant is a Chinese corporation. 

3. Because of the delay in obtaining Defendant Norinco's responses to discovery, 

the Plaintiff has been unable to conclude the additional discovery necessary to 

meet the previously imposed deadlines.

Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 18 Filed 02/14/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, defendant prays that this Court will

enter an Order extending the deadlines in the September 11, 2006 Scheduling 

Order for sixty (60) days.

/s/ David J. Hodge 

DAVID J. HODGE

Of Counsel for Plaintiff

OF COUNSEL:

PITTMAN, DUTTON, KIRBY & HELLUMS, P.C.

2001 Park Place North

1100 Park Place Tower

Birmingham, Alabama 35203

(205) 322-8880

(205) 328-2711 facsimile

Nick Wooten, Esq.

WOOTEN & CARLTON, P.C.

P.O. Drawer 290

Lafayette, Alabama 36862

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 14th day of February, 2007, I electronically 

filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which 

will send notification of such filing to the following: All counsel of record. 

I hereby further certify that I have mailed by United States Postal Service 

the document to the following non-CM/ECF participants:

Qiqihar Hawk Industries

No. 3 Delong Road

Technique Industrial Development District

Heilong Jiang Proy Province

Peoples Republic of China

/s/David J. Hodge _____

Of Counsel for Plaintiff

Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 18 Filed 02/14/2007 Page 2 of 2