alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 238 (Monday, December 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77670-77671]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31136]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-73,722]


Sojitz Corporation of America, a Subsidiary of Sojitz 
Corporation, Forest Products Department, Seattle, WA; Notice of Revised 
Determination on Reconsideration

    By application dated September 23, 2010, a State of Washington 
workforce official, on behalf of two workers, requested administrative 
reconsideration of the Department's negative determination regarding 
the eligibility of workers and former workers of Sojitz Corporation of 
America, a subsidiary of Sojitz Corporation, Forest Products 
Department, Seattle, Washington (subject firm) to apply for Trade 
Adjustment Assistance. On October 18, 2010, the Department issued a 
Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for 
Reconsideration applicable to workers of the subject firm. The Notice 
was published in the Federal Register on October 25, 2010 (75 FR 
65515). The subject workers are engaged in employment related to the 
supply of services related to the trade of forest products.
    During the reconsideration investigation, the Department received 
information that revealed that the subject firm had shifted to a 
foreign country the supply of services like or directly competitive 
with the services supplied by the subject workers, and that the shift 
to Canada contributed importantly to worker group separations at the 
subject firm.

[[Page 77671]]

Conclusion

    After careful review of the additional facts obtained on 
reconsideration, I determine that workers of the subject firm, who are 
engaged in employment related to the supply of forest product services, 
meet the worker group certification criteria under Section 222(a) of 
the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272(a). In accordance with Section 223 of the Act, 
19 U.S.C. 2273, I make the following certification:

    ``All workers of Sojitz Corporation of America, a subsidiary of 
Sojitz Corporation, Forest Products Department, Seattle, Washington, 
who became totally or partially separated from employment on or 
after March 15, 2009, through two years from the date of this 
revised certification, and all workers in the group threatened with 
total or partial separation from employment on date of certification 
through two years from the date of certification, are eligible to 
apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the 
Trade Act of 1974, as amended.''

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 3rd day of December, 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-31136 Filed 12-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### Carroll B. Stoianoff, Appellant, v Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc., Respondent.

Submitted August 6, 2007;

decided October 23, 2007

Reported below, 16 Misc 3d 128(A).

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the Court of Appeals does not have jurisdiction to entertain this *958motion for leave to appeal from the order of the Appellate Term (see NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b]; CPLR 5602).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-2502

In re: OSHAY TERRELL JONES,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. 

(7:13-cr-00038-MFU-1)

Submitted: February 26, 2019 Decided: February 28, 2019

Before KING, THACKER, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Oshay Terrell Jones, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Oshay Terrell Jones petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district 

court has unduly delayed in ruling on his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion filed in May 2018. 

He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present 

record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Subpart 433.1 - Protests    **Parent topic:** PART 433 - PROTESTS, DISPUTES AND APPEALS433.102 General.       (a) The Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) is responsible for coordinating the handling of bid protests lodged with the Government Accountability Office (GAO).          (b) The head of the contracting activity (HCA), on a non-delegable basis, may resolve protests and authorize reimbursement of costs in accordance with FAR 33.102(b).433.103 Protests to the agency.       (a) Actual or prospective bidders or offerors may file protests either with the HCA, as provided by 433.102(b), or with the contracting officer. Protesters who file protests with the HCA shall furnish a complete copy to the contracting officer no later than 1 day after the protest is filed with the HCA.          (b) When a protest is received, the adjudicating official shall take prompt action towards resolution and notify the protester in writing of the action taken. The written final decision shall include a paragraph substantially as follows:                                  This decision shall be final and conclusive unless a further written notice of protest is filed with the Government Accountability Office in accordance with 4 CFR part 21. Neither the filing of a protest with USDA nor the filing of a protest with the Government Accountability Office affects your right to file an action in a district court of the United States or the United States Court of Federal Claims.433.104 [Reserved]
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

WILLIE MCNAIR, )

)

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2:06-cv-695-WKW

)

RICHARD ALLEN, et al., )

)

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. )

____________________________________

)

JAMES CALLAHAN, )

)

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2:06-cv-919-WKW

)

RICHARD ALLEN, et al., )

)

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. )

ORDER

With respect to the pending dispositive motion, the parties are DIRECTED to submit or mail

a paper courtesy copy of briefs and supporting evidence to the Chambers of the undersigned. For

those submissions that exceed 25 pages, the paper courtesy copy shall be bound in a three-ring

binder and tabbed.

DONE this 12th day of April, 2007.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 47 Filed 04/12/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### § 98.101 Definitions.

Words used in the regulations in this part in the singular form will import the plural, and vice versa, as the case may demand. As used throughout the regulations in this part, unless the context requires otherwise, the following terms will be construed to mean:

*European Community.* The European Community (EC) consists of the initial 12 European countries and the updated and expanded membership of nations. The original EC members are Belgium, Britain, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal and Spain.

*Horsemeat.* That U.S. inspected and passed clean, wholesome muscle tissue of horses, which is skeletal or which is found in the tongue, in the diaphragm, in the heart, or in the esophagus, with or without the accompanying and overlying fat and the portions of sinews, nerves, and blood vessels, which normally accompany the muscle tissue and which are not separated from it in the process of dressing.

*Trichinae.* Round worms or nematodes of the genus *Trichinella,* which live as parasites in man, horses, rats, and other animals.

*Trichinella spiralis.* A small parasitic nematode worm which lives in the flesh of various animals, including the horse. When such infected meat is inadequately cooked and eaten by man, the live worm multiplies within the body and the larvae burrow their way into the muscles, causing a disease referred to as trichinosis.
#### In the Matter of Flash’s Lounge, Inc., Appellant, *v.*State Liquor Authority, Respondent.

Order entered December 5, 1966 unanimously reversed, on the law and facts, without costs or disbursements to either party, determination annulled and matter remanded to respondent for further proceedings. Appellant’s application for a special license to sell liquor at retail on the premises was recommended for approval by the local board but was disapproved by respondent following an interview with the corporate principal. It appears from the formal notice of disapproval of July 5, 1966 that the reason therefor was that this sole corporate shareholder intended to continue his then employment and would only devote part time services at the premises proposed for license. In passing respondent also “noted” and recited the record of arrests of this individual. None of these arrests resulted in a conviction. In view of the ambiguous treatment thereof in the notice of disapproval it is impossible to determine what weight respondent gave thereto or to the explanations of the corporate principal from which conceivably it could be concluded that there was no substance to the subject matter of any of the arrests. More important, however, the finding that the corporate principal would not devote full time to the business, if licensed, is not in accord with the record. This *724discloses that at the investigative interview of May 25, 1966 the individual stated that he would be on the premises “ from opening to- closing ” and planned to give up his then employment if the application was approved. We recognize that this is not a proceeding to review administrative action following a formal and mandated hearing. The area of review is to determine whether such action was arbitrary and capricious on all the facts before the administrative officer. *(Matter of Rochester Colony*v. *Hostetter,*19 A D 2d 250, 253.) Such a judicial determination may not be made because the stated reason for disapproval is not in accord with the facts and we are unable to ascertain what weight, if any, respondent gave to the *“*noted ” record of arrests. The application should be passed on anew and in the light of current facts. .Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Rabin and Bastow, JJ.
#### RHODES, Respondent, v. SPERRY & HUTCHINSON CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

July 24, 1906.)

Action by Aida T. Rhodes against the Sperry & Hutchinson Company.

No opinion. Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs.
#### § 58.415 Starter vats.

Bulk starter vats shall be of stainless steel or equally corrosion resistant metal and should be constructed according to the applicable 3-A Sanitary Standards. New or replacement vats shall be constructed according to the applicable 3-A Sanitary Standards. The vats shall be in good repair, equipped with tight fitting lids and have adequate temperature controls such as valves, indicating and/or recording thermometers.
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 10 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 10 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 2 of 6
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 10 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 10 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 4 of 6
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 10 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 10 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 6 of 6
#### § 983.27 Proprietary capacity.

*Proprietary capacity* means the capacity or interest of a producer or handler that, either directly or through one or more intermediaries, is a property owner together with all the appurtenant rights of an owner including the right to vote the interest in that capacity as an individual, a shareholder, member of a cooperative, partner, trustee or in any other capacity with respect to any other business unit.

[69 FR 17850, Apr. 4, 2004. Redesignated at 74 FR 56539, Nov. 2, 2009]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1.000
<CASH>                                          13,236
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 8,350
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     89,207
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          30,797
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            30,594
<LOANS>                                        205,954
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,699
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 356,890
<DEPOSITS>                                     302,436
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,465
<LONG-TERM>                                     19,992
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,829
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,168
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 356,890
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  4,407
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,801
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   114
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 6,322
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,690
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,947
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,375
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      135
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   2
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,586
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,191
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         851
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       851
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.88
<LOANS-NON>                                      4,334
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   672
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    114
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,750
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      194
<RECOVERIES>                                         8
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,699
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,571
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,128
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register: February 4, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 23)]
[Notices]               
[Page 5842-5843]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr04fe10-93]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

 
Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed the Week Ending January 
23, 2010

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the Sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation 
Act, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1382 and 1384) and procedures governing 
proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 
days after the filing of the application.

[[Page 5843]]

    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2010-0019.
    Date Filed: January 20, 2010.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: Mail Vote 618, TC3 Special Passenger Amending Resolution 
010L, between Japan and Korea (Rep. of), (Memo 1353), Intended 
effective date: 15 February 2010/1 April 2010.

Barbara J. Hairston,
Supervisory Dockets Officer, Docket Operations, Alternate Federal 
Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2010-2397 Filed 2-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

DANETTE COLAGRECO,

Petitioner

v.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL 

BOARD (VANGUARD GROUP INC.),

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 305 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of November, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

BARBARA M. JEFFERS and )

JOAN K. CRAIG, )

)

PlaintiffS, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06cv685-WKW

)

RUSSELL COUNTY BOARD )

OF EDUCATION, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

On February 15, 2008, the court held a mediation conference in this case. At the

conclusion of the conference the parties announced to the court that they had reached a

tentative settlement of all issues pending final approval by the Board. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED as follows:

1. That counsel for the Board shall notify the undersigned about the results of the

Board action concerning the settlement.

2. That if the Board approves the settlement, on or before March 11, 2008, the

parties shall file a joint stipulation for dismissal.

Done this 19th day of February, 2008.

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 61 Filed 02/19/2008 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          20,658
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     69,406
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        375,582
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,334
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 485,248
<DEPOSITS>                                     395,605
<SHORT-TERM>                                    13,104
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             22,251
<LONG-TERM>                                      2,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,503
<OTHER-SE>                                      47,785
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 485,248
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  8,297
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,080
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    97
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 9,474
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,715
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,090
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            5,384
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      277
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   6
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,330
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,549
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,703
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,703
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.38
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.08
<LOANS-NON>                                        942
<LOANS-PAST>                                        73
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   571
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    517
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,400
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      481
<RECOVERIES>                                       138
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,334
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,334
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
civb-ex46_11.htm



 

Exhibit 4.6

[CIVISTA BANCSHARES, INC. LETTERHEAD]

March 8, 2018

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, NE

Washington, DC 20549

Re:  Civista Bancshares, Inc. Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Civista Bancshares, Inc., an Ohio corporation (“CBI”), is today filing an Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 (the Form 10-K), as executed on March 8, 2018.

Pursuant to the instructions relating to the Exhibits in Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, CBI hereby agrees to furnish the Commission, upon request, copies of instruments and agreements defining the rights of holders of its long-term debt and of the long-term debt of its consolidated subsidiaries, which are not being filed as exhibits to the Form 10-K.  None of such long-term debt exceeds 10% of the total assets of CBI and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.  

Very truly yours,

 /s/ Dennis G. Shaffer

Dennis G. Shaffer

President and Chief Executive Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 26, 2011 

y0919 

Order 

 

September 26, 2011 

142988 

KYRIA GORE, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 142988 

 COA: 294157 

Wayne CC: 08-114429-NZ 

BRENDA BELCHER, DETROIT BOARD OF 

EDUCATION, and DETROIT PUBLIC 

SCHOOLS, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 17, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**SAMPLE NOTICE FORMAT**

Note: When E-Filing this pleading, please enter a separate docket entry. The event entry is located on

CM/ECF by clicking: CIVIL > OTHER DOCUMENTS > CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

________________________ DIVISION

_________________________________, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. __________________

)

_________________________________, )

)

Defendants, )

CORPORATE/CONFLICT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

In accordance with the order of this Court, the undersigned party or parties to the

above-captioned matter do hereby make the following disclosure concerning parent

companies, subsidiaries, affiliates, partnership, joint ventures, debtor, creditors’ committee,

or other entities reportable under the provisions of the Middle District of Alabama’s General

Order No. 3047:

There are no entities to be reported.

- or -

The following entities are hereby reported:

____________________________________________________

____________________________________________________

____________________________________________________

 Signature 

 Date Counsel

 

Counsel for (print names of all parties)

 

Address, City, State Zip Code

 

Telephone Number

***Certificate of Service Required

Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 58-2 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 3 of 3