alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          36,901
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  439,602
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               773,951
<PP&E>                                       2,886,403
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,791,750
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          846,666
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         61
<COMMON>                                        82,385
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,349,187
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,791,750
<SALES>                                      1,893,210
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,893,210
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,790,762
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                102,448
<INCOME-TAX>                                    38,930
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             63,518
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    63,518
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

NICHOLAS STRICKLAND, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) 1:06-CV-00682-DRB

)

CHAMPION ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

O R D E R 

By ORDER entered September 12, 2006 (Doc. 12), the Court DENIED the Motion to Dismiss

or, in the Alternative Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Defendant Champion Enterprises, Inc.

(Doc. 5, August 4, 2006) to the extent of its request for dismissal, but to the extent of its request for

Summary Judgment, the court reserved ruling pending completion of limited discovery and set a

November 17, 2006 deadline for any supplementation of the motion, along with a December 1

deadline for any opposition. 

Defendant timely filed a SUPPLEMENT on November 17, 2006 (Doc. 18) but captioned its

pleading Supplement to Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the Clerk docket this pleading as Supplement to Motion for Summary

Judgment and Motion to Seal. Plaintiff is hereby REMINDED of his December 1, 2006,

deadline to file any opposition to the summary judgment motion (Doc. 5) as supplemented

(Doc. 18).

DONE THIS 20 day of November, 2006. th

/s/ Delores R. Boyd

Delores R. Boyd

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 20 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 1 of 1
409.503 Waiver.       (a) The HCA, on a non-delegable basis, is authorized to waive any general rule or procedure in FAR 9.5 when in the Government's interest.          (b) Each request for waiver shall include:          (1) The general rule or procedure proposed to be waived;          (2) An analysis of the potential conflict, including the benefits and detriments to the Government and prospective contractors;          (3) A discussion of why the conflict cannot be avoided, neutralized, or mitigated; and          (4) Advice of counsel obtained under FAR 9.504(b).    **Parent topic:** Subpart 409.5 - Organizational and Consultant Conflicts of Interest
Part 5245 - GOVERNMENT PROPERTY

Subpart 5245.1 - GENERAL

5245.102 Policy.

5245.103-71 Transferring Government property accountability.

5245.103-74 Contracting office responsibilities.

Subpart 5245.6 - REPORTING, REUTILIZATION AND DISPOSAL

5245.602 Reutilization of Government property.

5245.602-3 Screening.

Subpart 5245.1 - GENERAL

5245.102 Policy.

(4)(ii)(C)(1)(i) Submit the required D&Fs for approval to DASN(P) by email at

usn.pentagon.asstsecnavrdadc.mbx.pabt@us.navy.mil with the subject “[Activity Name] DFARS

245.102(4)(ii)(C)(1)(i) - Government-Furnished Property Identification Exception D&F.”

(2) Submit copies of D&Fs executed pursuant to DFARS 245.102(4)(ii)(C)(1) to DASN(P) by email at

usn.pentagon.asstsecnavrdadc.mbx.pabt@us.navy.mil with the subject “[Activity Name] DFARS

245.102- Government-Furnished Property Identification Exception D&F.”

5245.103-71 Transferring Government property accountability.

The contracting officer shall obtain approval of an authorized representative of the requiring activity

before transferring property between contracts.

5245.103-74 Contracting office responsibilities.

(S-90) When the use of FAR clause 52.245-1, Government Property, is required, the contracting

officer shall complete Annex 9, Government-Furnished Property Preaward Compliance Checklist

with the business clearance.

Subpart 5245.6 - REPORTING, REUTILIZATION AND
DISPOSAL

5245.602 Reutilization of Government property.

5245.602-3 Screening.

(a) To accomplish the screening requirements within prescribed time periods, the following

procedures shall be employed:

(S-90)(1) Upon receipt of inventory schedules in acceptable form, the plant clearance office should

provide an original to the requiring activity and copies to DON inventory managers, the contracting

activity, and Naval activities other than inventory managers who have potential requirements for the

property.

(2) Provide retention and redistribution requirements of the owning Commands, Offices and Bureaus

(requiring activities), inventory managers, contracting activities and other Naval activities directly to

the reporting office during this period.

(b) The final approval for contractor retention of standard components of special test equipment

(STE) or for the transfer of industrial plant equipment items that are components of STE, shall be

made by the contracting officer in lieu of the ACO.

(c) Prior to authorizing retention of items in storage the contracting officer shall ensure that a

retention plan has been developed. Retention plans shall include the justification for storage, a

detailed description of the property to be stored, storage costs, location, planned period of storage,

and source of funds for storage. The use of "no-costs" or no direct cost storage agreements is

prohibited.
§ 66.204 Submission of request or petition. ( a ) *Submission procedures and format.* A person must submit the request to the Agricultural Marketing Service in the form and manner established by AMS.
( b ) *Required information.* The request or petition must include the information described in this paragraph (b). ( 1 ) Description of the requested factor or condition.
( 2 ) Analysis of why the requested factor or condition should be included in considering whether a food is a bioengineered food, including any relevant information, publications, and/or data. The analysis should include how the Administrator should apply the standards for consideration in § 66.202.
( 3 ) If the request or petition contains Confidential Business Information (CBI), the submission must comply with the requirements of this paragraph (b)(3). ( i ) The requester or petitioner must submit one copy that is marked as “CBI Copy” on the first page and on each page containing CBI.
( ii ) The requester or petitioner must submit a second copy with the CBI deleted. This copy must be marked as “CBI Redacted” on the first page and on each page where the CBI was deleted.
( iii ) The submission must include an explanation as to why the redacted information is CBI.
[874 NE2d 727, 842 NYS2d 763]

#### In the Matter of Jerome C. Ellis.

Decided September 4, 2007

OPINION OF THE COURT

On the Court’s own motion, it is determined that Honorable Jerome C. Ellis is suspended, with pay, effective immediately, from the office of Justice of the Leon Town Court, Cattaraugus *885County, pending disposition of his request for review of a determination by the State Commission on Judicial Conduct.

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.
# Help for candidates and committees

Learn more about how individuals and groups can be active in federal elections and the requirements that apply to them.

## Guides

Icon representing a notebook              Candidates and their authorized committees            

Icon representing a notebook              Political party committees            

Icon representing a notebook              Corporations and labor organizations            

Icon representing a notebook              Political action committees (PACs)            

Icon representing a notebook              Other filers            

## Popular topics

### Contribution limits

Under the Federal Election Campaign Act, contributions are subject to limits. Those limits differ depending on the type of donor and recipient.

### Tips for treasurers

All tips
          -  Does your committee have a website?  September 23, 2024 
          -  September monthly reporting reminder  September 16, 2024 
          -  Cybersecurity tips for campaigns  September 9, 2024 
          -  Electioneering communications period for the general election begins this Friday  September 3, 2024 

      -    Electronic filing information 
      -    Forms  All FEC registration reporting and forms 
      -    Dates and deadlines  All FEC reporting deadlines, reporting periods and compliance periods 
      -    Education and learning  Videos, trainings, webinars and conferences 

## You might also like

#### Look up information reported and filed with the FEC

            - Search for your committee's information and filings
            - Statements of candidacy filed by office
            - Statements of organization filed by committees

#### Learn about enforcement of federal campaign finance law

            - Enforcement overview
            - Search closed Matters Under Review   (MURs)
            - Search advisory opinions   (AOs)
            - Search guidance documents

#### Get help from an FEC analyst

If you represent a committee or another entitiy registered with the FEC, our staff can help answer your reporting questions.

            - Find and contact your analyst
            - Browse reporting examples

This information is not intended to replace the law or to change its meaning, nor does this information create or confer any rights for or on any person or bind the Federal Election Commission or the public.

The reader is encouraged also to consult the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended (52 U.S.C. 30101 et seq.), Commission regulations (Title 11 of the Code of Federal Regulations), Commission advisory opinions and applicable court decisions.
#### § 948.87 Duration of immunities.

The benefits, privileges and immunities conferred upon any person by virtue of this subpart shall cease upon the termination of this subpart, except with respect to acts done under and during the existence of this subpart.
§ 763.7 Application requirements. ( a ) *Seller application requirements.* A seller who contacts the Agency with interest in a guarantee under the Land Contract Guarantee Program will be sent the land contract letter of interest outlining specific program details. To formally request a guarantee on the proposed land contract, the seller, and each entity member in the case of an entity, must: ( 1 ) Complete, sign, date, and return the land contract letter of interest to the Agency, and
( 2 ) Provide the name, address, and telephone number of the chosen servicing or escrow agent.
( b ) *Buyer application requirements.* A complete application from the buyer will include: ( 1 ) The completed Agency application form;
( 2 ) A current financial statement (not older than 90 days);
( 3 ) If the buyer is an entity: ( i ) A complete list of entity members showing the address, citizenship, principal occupation, and the number of shares and percentage of ownership or stock held in the entity by each member, or the percentage of interest in the entity held by each member;
( ii ) A current financial statement for each member of the entity;
( iii ) A current financial statement for the entity itself;
( iv ) A copy of the entity's charter or any entity agreement, any articles of incorporation and bylaws, any certificate or evidence of current registration (in good standing), and a resolution adopted by the Board of Directors or entity members authorizing specified officers of the entity to apply for and obtain the land contract guarantee and execute required debt, security, and other instruments and agreements; and
( v ) In the form of a married couple applying as a joint operation, items in paragraphs (b)(3)(i) and (b)(3)(iv) of this section will not be required. The Agency may request copies of the marriage license, prenuptial agreement, or similar documents as needed to verify loan eligibility and security. The information specified in paragraphs (b)(3)(ii) and (iii) of this section are only required to the extent needed to show the individual and joint finances of the husband and wife without duplication;
( 4 ) A brief written description of the buyer's proposed operation;
( 5 ) A farm operating plan;
( 6 ) A brief written description of the buyer's farm training and experience;
( 7 ) Three years of income tax and other financial records acceptable to the Agency, unless the buyer has been farming less than 3 years;
( 8 ) Three years of farm production records, unless the buyer has been farming less than 3 years;
( 9 ) Verification of income and off-farm employment if relied upon for debt repayment;
( 10 ) Verification of all debts;
( 11 ) Payment of the credit report fee;
( 12 ) Documentation of compliance with the environmental regulations in part 799 of this chapter;
( 13 ) A copy of the proposed land contract; and
( 14 ) Any additional information deemed necessary by the Agency to effectively evaluate the applicant's eligibility and farm operating plan.
[76 FR 75430, Dec. 2, 2011, as amended at 79 FR 60744, Oct. 8, 2014; 81 FR 51284, Aug. 3, 2016]
[J-98A&B-2016]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Appellee

v.

RONALD LEE DOUGALEWICZ, JR.,

Appellant

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Nos. 22 & 23 WAP 2015

Appeal from the Orders of the Superior 

Court entered March 30, 2015 at Nos. 247 

& 248 WDA 2014, affirming the judgments

of sentence of the Court of Common Pleas 

of Lawrence County entered September 6, 

2013 at Nos. CP-37-0000514-2009 and 

CP-37-CR-0001129-2009.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of March, 2017, this appeal is dismissed as having 

been improvidently granted. 

Justices Donohue and Wecht dissent.
#### § 966.10 Grade and size.

*Grade* means any one of the established grades of tomatoes and *size* means any one of the established sizes of tomatoes as defined and set forth in U.S. Standards for Fresh Tomatoes (§§ 51.1855 to 51.1877 of this title or U.S. Consumer Standards for Fresh Tomatoes (§§ 51.1900 to 51.1913 of this title), both issued by the United States Department of Agriculture, or amendments thereto, or modifications thereof, or variations based thereon recommended by the committee and approved by the Secretary.
#### Stephen Koroluck, Appellant, v. Giordano’s Service Center, Inc., et al., Respondents.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered October 6, 1969 in favor of defendants upon a jury verdict after a trial limited to the issues of liability. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. In our opinion, the jury was confused as to applicable law, despite having been accurately charged by the learned trial court. After their deliberations the foreman of the jury informed the court that the jury had concluded that both sides were guilty of negligence. The statement of the foreman was improper in form and gratuitous, since only a general verdict was warranted in this ease, no special questions haviner been submitted to the jury. Despite this, however, the statement by the foreman revealed a certain confusion on the part *of*the jury. Plaintiff was a passenger in a ear driven by his wife, and co-owned by both of them. Defendant Bertolino was the driver of a car which crashed into the rear of plaintiff’s car. Since the negligence of plaintiff’s wife, if such existed, could not be imputed to plaintiff because of co-ownership *1014
      *(Winser*v. *Trombley,*14 A D 2d 963), and since the record is devoid of any evidence as to plaintiff’s contributory negligence, there was no basis for a jury’s determination that plaintiff had been negligent. Upon being polled, 10 members of the jury stated there was no cause of action, one member stating he found for plaintiff, and one that he found for defendants. While there is ample basis in the record, in our opinion, to support a verdict -of no cause of action, it was against the weight of the evidence to conclude that no cause of action existed since the jury indicated, though gratuitously, that its basis for such determination lay in the contributory negligence of plaintiff. The plaintiff passenger was reading certain business papers when the accident occurred and there is no evidence in the record to indicate that his wife was driving improperly so as to put him on notice. If there was negligence on her part, it was of a sudden and momentary nature, which plaintiff could not have expected. Christ, P. J., Munder, Martuscello, Latham and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
#### § 58.716 Nonfat dry milk.

Nonfat dry milk used in cheese products should meet the requirements equivalent to U.S. Extra Grade except that the moisture content may be in excess of that specified for the particular grade.
§ 1003.17 Standard of review. ( a ) The OHA will grant a petition that seeks an adjustment from a DOE rule, regulation or order under the authority of 42 U.S.C. 7194 only if it determines that doing so will alleviate or prevent serious hardship, gross inequity or unfair distribution of burdens.
( b ) Except as provided by program, statute, rule, regulation, or DOE delegation of authority, the OHA will grant any other petition filed under this part upon a showing that the DOE acted arbitrarily, capriciously, or in violation of a law, rule, regulation, or delegation with respect to the final disposition of DOE that is the subject of the petition.
( c ) Petitions shall be decided in a manner that is, to the extent possible, consistent with the disposition of previous petitions of the same kind.
642.1503-70 Contractor Performance

Assessment Reporting System (CPARS).

(a) The Department of State subscribes to the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting

System (CPARS) maintained at http://www.cpars.gov/. CPARS is an Internet-based tool allowing

government activities to input past performance information. This information is uploaded by CPARS

into the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS).

(b) All DOS contracting officers shall evaluate contractors' past performance as required by FAR

42.1502 and 42.1503.

(c) All Terminations for Default and Terminations for Cause shall be entered into CPARS regardless

of contract purpose or dollar value.

(d) Heads of contracting activities shall send a list of the names, work addresses, and phone

numbers of all acquisition personnel whom they wish to have access to the CPARS to

AQMCPARS@state.gov.

Parent topic: Subpart 642.15—Contractor Performance Information
###### Editorial Note on Subpart A of Part 989

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 989 appear at 83 FR 53973, Oct. 26, 2018.

#### § 989.30 Selection.

The Secretary shall select producer, handler, cooperative bargaining association(s), and public members and alternate members in the number specified in 989.26, as applicable, and with the qualifications specified in § 989.27. Such selections may be made from nominations certified pursuant to § 989.29 or from other eligible producers, handlers, or cooperative bargaining association(s) officers or employees.

[48 FR 32975, July 20, 1983]
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.14




Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation


Cash Compensation


Each member of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Investors Title Company (the “Company”) who is not an employee of the Company receives an annual retainer for Board services of $5,000 and an attendance fee of $2,500 for each meeting of the Board attended, in addition to actual travel expenses related to the meetings. Non-employee directors also receive a $750 fee for participating in a committee meeting, provided that the committee meeting is held on a day other than the regularly scheduled Board meeting date. The Audit Committee Chairperson receives an additional annual retainer of $500.  


Equity Compensation


Non-employee Board members are eligible to receive awards of stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) under the Company’s 2009 Stock Appreciation Rights. The Board determines awards of SARs for non-employee directors on an annual basis at its regularly scheduled Board meeting in May of each year.
# Subpart 644.3—Contractors' Purchasing Systems Reviews

**Parent topic:**PART 644—SUBCONTRACTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

## 644.302 Requirements.

(a) The Procurement Executive is the head of the agency for the purpose of FAR 44.302(a).
May 14,2015 Dona l d W. McDaniel , P.E . Engineering Supervisor United Powe r, Inc 500 Coope ra ti ve Way Brighton, CO 80603 U . S . Departme nt of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave ., SE Washington DC 20590

To Whom It Ma y Concern, My name is Donald McDan ie l and I am the engineering supervisor w it h United Power, Inc, I am also a member on the Cooperative Research Network's, Transmission and Distribution Committee . I would like to encourage your award of a license for use of a drone to Colorado Aerial Imaging . United Power has been very interested in this technology for inspection of poles throughout our territory, where access can be difficult. We believe that the use of this technology could prove vi tal to improving not only the rel iability but the safety of the distribution system. This includes portions of our system where line fai l u res could result in potential fire hazards . Pe rsonally, I have been quoted in two national publications related to our support for this technology and if it can be done both efficiently and cost effectively, I believe our utility would be interested in uti l iz i ng the services of Colorado Aerial Imaging.

Donald W . McDaniel, P. E.



### UNITED POWER, INC. PO BOX**2~1** 

### • 8; ighton . 

### C O 

### 8060 1**303-6 59-055~**  

### • 8 0

0- 46 R-R R 09 • fax 

### ::<OlG:d - 2 1

/2**wvv~v** rlni tr! ilp : )\-'o·P.r !:cll n
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 7 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 7 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 7 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 7-2 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 7-2 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 2 of 2
# Subpart 744.2—Consent to Subcontracts

**Parent topic:**PART 744—SUBCONTRACTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

## 744.202-170 Partner vetting.

If an acquisition is identified as subject to partner vetting, see (48 CFR) AIDAR 704.70 for the applicable procedures and requirements.
#### § 983.10 Department or USDA.

*Department or USDA* means the United States Department of Agriculture.