alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Anthony Falco, Appellant, v. City of New York, Respondent.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings -County, entered May 2, 1969, which set aside a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff and dismissed the complaint, and (2) an order of said court dated May 9, 1969, which, granting reargument and reconsideration, adhered to the original decision setting aside the verdict and *674dismissing the complaint. Judgment and order affirmed, without costs. “ The complaint having been dismissed, this court must, in determining whether the facts proved constitute a cause of action, give the appellant the benefit of every favorable inference which can reasonably .be drawn ” *(Faber*v. *City of New York,*213 N. Y. 411, 414). The proof in behalf of plaintiff was that plaintiff, riding a motorcycle, was struck by a motor vehicle and thrown to the ground, sustaining severe injuries. While lying on the ground in .pain, he asked a police officer of the City of New York, then present and investigating the accident, to obtain for him the name and license number of the driver of the motor vehicle. The plaintiff testified that the police officer said — “‘All right, don’t worry about anything.’ * * * < You just lie still.’ * * * ‘ I’ll take care of everything. The ambulance is on its way.’ ” Afterward the plaintiff observed the officer talking with the driver but the officer failed to record the name and address of the driver, thus making it impossible for plaintiff to institute a negligence action against the driver of the automobile. The basic issue is whether defendant city may be held liable for the negligence of a police officer in investigating an accident because of a gratuitous promise made by him to an injured party to obtain the name of another party allegedly involved in the accident, and his failure to perform that promise. In our opinion, the verdict was properly set aside. There was no such relationship on the part of the plaintiff to the defendant as created a duty to use due care for the benefit of particular persons or classes of persons and as imposed liability on the part of the municipality for the negligence of the police officer *(Motyka*v. *City of Amsterdam,*15 N Y 2d 134; *Riss*v. *City of New York,*22 N Y 2d 579). Christ, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Munder and Brennan, JJ., concur.
**Annual
      Statement of Compliance**





VIA:
      EMAIL





Banc
      of
      America Commercial Mortgage Inc.


214
      North
      Tryon Street, NC1-027-22-03


Charlotte,
      North Carolina 28255





Re:
      Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of October 1, 2006,
      among Banc of America Commercial Mortgage Inc., as Depositor, Bank of America,
      N.A., as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, INC., as Special Servicer,
      and
      LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee and REMIC Administrator relating
      to Banc of America Commercial Mortgage Trust, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
      Certificates, Series 2006-5.





I,
      Barbara L. Marik, a First Vice President of LaSalle Bank National Association,
      as Trustee and REMIC Administrator hereby certify that:





(1)
      A
      review of the activities of the Trustee and REMIC Administrator during the
      preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Trustee and REMIC
      Administrator under the Agreement has been made under my supervision;
      and





(2)
      To
      the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Trustee and REMIC
      Administrator has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all
      material respects throughout such year or a portion thereof.











Date: February
      1, 2007





LaSalle
      Bank, National Association, as Trustee and REMIC Administrator








/s/
      Barbara L Marik


Barbara
      L. Marik


First
      Vice President
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This
certification is intended to accompany the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Berkshire Bancorp Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report),
and is given solely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. The undersigned, in my capacity as set forth below, hereby certifies to
the best of my knowledge that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The
 Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | (2) | The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |                                                                            
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Steven Rosenberg                                                       
| |                                                                            
| | Steven Rosenberg,                                                          
| | Chief Executive Officer, President
and Chief Financial Officer
May 11, 2009

---
1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS

No. 113,928

In the Matter of ELIZABETH ANNE HUEBEN,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DISCHARGE FROM PROBATION

On October 30, 2015, the court stayed the imposition of a two-year suspension and 

placed the respondent, Elizabeth Anne Hueben, on probation for a period of two years

with specific conditions. See In re Hueben, 302 Kan. 979, 362 P.3d 809 (2015). 

On November 21, 2017, the respondent filed a motion for discharge from 

probation, along with affidavits demonstrating compliance with the terms of probation. 

On November 28, 2017, the Disciplinary Administrator filed a response, 

confirming that the respondent fully complied with the conditions imposed upon her by 

the court and offered no objection to the respondent's discharge from probation. 

This Court, having reviewed the motion, the affidavits, and the recommendation of 

the Disciplinary Administrator, grants the respondent's motion for discharge from 

probation. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the respondent is hereby discharged from 

probation and from any further obligation in this matter and this proceeding is closed. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order shall be published in the Kansas Reports 

and that the costs herein shall be assessed to the respondent.
2

Dated this 1st day of March, 2018.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3023 

To suspend temporarily the duty on waste of camel hair. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 24, 2006 

Mr. LIEBERMAN (for himself and Mr. DODD) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on waste of camel hair. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. WASTE OF CAMEL HAIR. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.12.21 Waste of camel hair (provided for in subheading 

5103.20.00) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•S 3023 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
#### § 923.17 Container.

*Container* means a box, bag, crate, lug, basket, carton, package, or any other type of receptacle used in the packaging or handling of cherries.
# Subpart 1303.1 - Safeguards

**Parent topic:**PART 1303 - IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

## 1303.101 Standards of conduct.

## 1303.101-2 Solicitation and acceptance of gratuities by government personnel.

(a) Suspected violations of the prohibition on soliciting and accepting gratuities shall be reported to the Office of the Inspector General in accordance with DAO 207-10, *Inspector General Investigations.*

(b) To obtain legal advice regarding the solicitation and acceptance of gratuities, contact the Office of the Assistant General Counsel for Administration, Ethics Law and Program Division.   

## 1303.101-3 Agency regulations.

The Department has issued rules implementing Executive Order 11222 prescribing employee standards of conduct (*see* DOC Office of General Counsel Web site).   

## 1303.104 Procurement integrity.

## 1303.104-4 Disclosure, protection and marking of contractor bid or proposal information and source selection information.

Contractor bid or proposal information and source selection information must be protected from unauthorized disclosure in accordance with FAR Parts 3, 14 and 15, and CAM 1315.3.

## 1303.104-7 Violations or possible violations.

Suspected violations of the Procurement Integrity Act shall be reported to the individuals designated in CAM 1301.70.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                        760,278
<SECURITIES>                  0                         <F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                 105,197
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              0
<PP&E>                        12,155,434                <F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                3,222,501
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                10,202,303
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         253,982
<BONDS>                       6,221,906                 <F3>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      2,758,279                 <F4>
<OTHER-SE>                    0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  10,202,303 
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              1,191,013                 <F5>
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 595,860                   <F6>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              734,282                   <F7>
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0           
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            412,320
<INCOME-PRETAX>               0
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           0
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0       
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (551,449)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 0
<EPS-DILUTED>                 0


<FN>
<F1>   "SECURITIES" REPRESENTS INVESTMENT IN JOINT VENTURE
<F2>   "PP&E" REPRESENTS INVESTMENT IN REAL ESTATE [LAND AND
BUILDING]
<F3>   "BONDS" REPRESENTS MORTGAGES PAYABLE
<F4>   "COMMON" REPRESENTS TOTAL PARTNERS CAPITAL
<F5>   "TOTAL REVENUES" REPRESENTS RENTAL, INTEREST, AND OTHER
INCOME
<F6>   "TOTAL COSTS" REPRESENTS TOTAL EXPENSES LESS INTEREST
EXPENSE
<F7>   "OTHER EXPENSES" REPRESENTS INTEREST IN JOINT VENTURES' NET
INCOME/LOSS
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00044-CR

Robert Jones

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 371st District Court

of Tarrant County (1260465D)

October 3, 2013

Opinion by Justice Meier

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _________________________________

 Justice Bill Meier
47.305-14 Mode of transportation.

Generally, solicitations shall not specify a particular mode of transportation or a particular carrier. If

the use of particular types of carriers is necessary to meet program requirements, the solicitation

shall provide that only offers involving the specified types of carriers will be considered. The

contracting officer shall obtain all specifications for mode, route, delivery, etc., from the

transportation office.

Parent topic: 47.305 Solicitation provisions, contract clauses, and transportation factors.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3218 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3218

  To reduce temporarily the duty on certain pepperoncini prepared or 
preserved by vinegar or acetic acid in concentrations at 0.5 percent or 
                                greater.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To reduce temporarily the duty on certain pepperoncini prepared or 
preserved by vinegar or acetic acid in concentrations at 0.5 percent or 
                                greater.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN PEPPERONCINI PREPARED OR PRESERVED BY VINEGAR OR 
              ACETIC ACID IN CONCENTRATIONS AT 0.5 PERCENT OR GREATER.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.10.29        Pepperoncini,          2.2%       No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           prepared or                                                       31/2009          ''
                           preserved by vinegar                                                                .
                           (provided for in
                           subheading
                           2001.90.38).........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Filed 3/19/20 by Clerk of Supreme Court



### IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOT A

2020 ND 57

Royce Don Carlson, Plaintiff and Appellee

v. Jill Marie Carlson, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20190187

Appeal from the District Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Troy J. LeFevre , Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam

. James D. Sandsmark, Fargo, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.

Ashley C. Halvorson, Fargo, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.2 Carlson v. Carlson No. 20190187

Per C uriam

. [¶1] Jill Carlson appealed from a district court judgment awarding Royce Carlson primary residential responsibility and decision

- making authority over daycare/afterschool provider decisions and non

- emergency medical decision s of the parties’ minor children. Jill Carlson argues the district court’s findings on
best

- interest factors a, b, d, e, f, h, j, k, and l under N.D.C.C . § 14

- 09

- 06.2 were clearly erroneous. We retained jurisdiction under N.D.R.App.P. 35(a)(3) and remanded with instructions that the district court make further findings on
best

- interest factor j, which considers evidence of domestic violence. Carlson v.
Ca rlson , 2020 ND 36, 938 N.W.2d 413.

[¶2] The district court issued its additional findings , and found the evidence did not trigger a presumption of domestic violence, and if a presumption did apply, it was overcome by clear and convincing evidence. After reviewi ng the district court’s findings on the best

- interest factors, and its additional findings on factor j, we conclude the district court’s finding that the evidence did not trigger the presumption of domestic violence is not clearly erroneous, and we summari ly affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶3] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Jerod E. Tufte Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers
###### Editorial Note on Part 982

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 61 FR 17559, Apr. 22, 1996.

#### § 982.19 Disappearance.

*Disappearance* means the difference between orchard-run production and the available supply of merchantable hazelnuts and merchantable equivalent of shelled hazelnuts.

[46 FR 26038, May 11, 1981]
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3165 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on 5-MPDC. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. BOND introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on 5-MPDC. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 5-MPDC. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.01.14 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 5-MPDC) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and in7 serting ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
Exhibit 13.2**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350), asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of AvagoTechnologies Finance Pte. Ltd. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:(i) the accompanying report of the Company on Form 20-F for the period ended October 31, 2007(the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Date: December 12, 2007 /s/ Mercedes Johnson   Mercedes Johnson   Chief Financial Officer   The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not beingfiled as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3015 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3015

   To suspend temporarily the duty on calcium halophosphate phosphor 
                  activated by manganese and antimony.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 24, 2006

Mr. Reid (for Mr. Rockefeller) introduced the following bill; which was 
          read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on calcium halophosphate phosphor 
                  activated by manganese and antimony.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CALCIUM HALOPHOSPHATE PHOSPHOR ACTIVATED BY MANGANESE AND 
              ANTIMONY.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.32.08      Calcium             Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         halophosphate                                                      31/2009
                         phosphor
                         activated by
                         manganese and
                         antimony.
                         Inorganic
                         products of a
                         kind used as
                         luminophores (CAS
                         No. 75535-31-8)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         3206.50.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 982

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 61 FR 17559, Apr. 22, 1996.

#### § 982.4 Hazelnuts.

*Hazelnuts* means hazelnuts or filberts produced in the States of Oregon and Washington from trees of the genus Corylus.

[61 FR 17559, Apr. 22, 1996]
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2949 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain footwear valued over $20 a 

pair with coated or laminated textile fabrics. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 23, 2006 

Mr. CARPER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain footwear valued 

over $20 a pair with coated or laminated textile fabrics. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN FOOTWEAR VALUED OVER $20 A PAIR 

4 WITH COATED OR LAMINATED TEXTILE FAB5 RICS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 2949 IS 

‘‘ 9902.64.02 Footwear, other than men’s 

or women’s, valued over $20/ 

pair designed to be worn 

over, or in lieu of, other 

footwear as a protection 

against water, oil, grease or 

chemicals or cold or inclement weather where such protection includes protection 

against water that is imparted by the use of a coated or laminated textile fabric 

(except footwear with waterproof injection molded bottoms, i.e. comprising a complete outer sole and all or 

part of the upper) (provided 

in subheading 6402.91.50) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS