alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.3





| | 
| | 



Annual Statement of Compliance

GS Mortgage Securities Trust 2012-GCJ9



VIA EMAIL



GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II

200 West Street

New York, New York 10282-2198

Attention: Leah Nivison

leah.nivison@gs.com



Re:	GS Mortgage Securities Trust
2012-GCJ9, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series2012-GCJ9 (the “Trust”),
issued pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2012 (the “Agreement”), by and among
GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, as depositor, U.S. Bank National Association, as certificate administrator (the “Certificate
Administrator”) and trustee, Pentalpha Surveillance, LLC, as operating advisor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as
master servicer, and Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer.



I, Kimberly O. Jacobs,
a Senior Vice President of U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator, hereby certify that:



(1) A review of the activities
of the Certificate Administrator during the preceding calendar year (the “Reporting Period”) and of the performance
of the Certificate Administrator under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and



(2) To the best of my knowledge,
based on such review, the Certificate Administrator has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
throughout such Reporting Period.



Capitalized terms used
but not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.





Date: March 15, 2016





U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator





By: _/s/ Kimberly O. Jacobs__________

Kimberly O. Jacobs

Senior Vice President
ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

September 20, 2024

CR-2022-1213

Altonio Spencer v. State of Alabama (Appeal from Mobile Circuit Court: CC-18-287 

and CC-18-288) 

NOTICE 

You are hereby notified that on September 20, 2024, the following action was 

taken in the above-referenced cause by the Court of Criminal Appeals:

Application for Rehearing Overruled.

D. Scott Mitchell, Clerk
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Achievement GainsDisadvantaged YouthEducational ChangeEducational ResearchElementary EducationElementary School StudentsEvaluation MethodsLimited English SpeakingParent ParticipationProfessional DevelopmentProgram EvaluationReading AchievementSpecial EducationUrban SchoolsUrban Youth

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Scott A. Caldwell, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Allied Nevada Gold Corp.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis report. 

Dated: April 13, 2009 

/s/ SCOTT A. CALDWELL

Scott A. Caldwell 

President and Chief Executive Officer
###### Editorial Note on [Subchapter A of Chapter VIII](/current/title-7/chapter-VIII/subchapter-A)

#### Authority:

[7 U.S.C. 71-87K](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/7/71), [1621-1627](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/7/1621).

###### Editorial Note on [Subchapter A of Chapter VIII](/current/title-7/chapter-VIII/subchapter-A)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at [84 FR 45645](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/84-FR-45645), Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 810.304 Grades and grade requirements for canola.

| Grading factors | Grades, U.S. Nos. | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 2 | 3 |
| | Maximum percent limits of: | | |
| Damaged kernels: | | | |
| Heat damaged | 0.1 | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| Distinctly green | 2.0 | 6.0 | 20.0 |
| Total | 3.0 | 10.0 | 20.0 |
| Conspicuous admixture: | | | |
| Ergot | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Sclerotinia | 0.05 | 0.10 | 0.15 |
| Stones | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Total | 1.0 | 1.5 | 2.0 |
| Inconspicuous admixture | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| | Maximum count limits of: | | |
| Other material: | | | |
| Animal filth | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Glass | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unknown foreign substance | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| U.S. Sample grade Canola that: | | | |
| (a) Does not meet the requirements for U.S. Nos. 1, 2, 3; or | | | |
| (b) Has a musty, sour, or commercially objectionable foreign odor; or | | | |
| (c) Is heating or otherwise of distinctly low quality. | | | |
#### Timothy S. Garrett, Individually and as Limited Administrator of the Estate of Nancy J. Garrett, Deceased, Respondent, v Town of Greece, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Plaintiffs wife died when she was trapped in a fire which destroyed the Holiday Inn Northwest located in the Town of Greece. His complaint alleges that her death was caused by the negligence of the town and its officers (among others) in that the town (1) employed inexperienced and incompetent personnel charged with approving building projects and issuing building permits, (2) failed to require the owners of Holiday Inn Northwest to comply with the applicable codes, ordinances and regulations dealing with building and fire safety, (3) failed adequately to inspect the construction of the motel and (4) failed to enforce its own codes and fire safety requirements. Specifically, he alleges that during construction the town officers authorized a change in the original building plans altering the motel design from a design which complied with the codes to one,which did not. He seeks damages for his *774wife’s wrongful death, her conscious pain and suffering and for his loss of consortium. Special Term erred in denying the town’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff has alleged no more than a violation by the town of a general duty owed to the public at large, conduct which does not impose upon it any liability to plaintiff (see *Sanchez v Village of Liberty,*42 NY2d 876; *Gordon v Holt,*65 AD2d 344, mot for lv to app den 47 NY2d 710; *Ascrizzi v Kaufman,*57 AD2d 643). (Appeal from order of Monroe Supreme . Court—dismiss complaint.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Hancock, Jr., Callahan and Witmer, JJ.
Subpart 630.2—CAS Program Requirements

Parent topic: PART 630—COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ADMINISTRATION

630.201 Contract requirements.

630.201-5 Waiver.

(a) The Procurement Executive is the head of the agency for the purposes of FAR 30.201–5(a) and

(b).
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                               12
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         1
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     13
<PP&E>                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       13
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 0
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                           13
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         13
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      0
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                          0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0
        


</TABLE>
#### John Moody, Respondent, v Svetlana Sorokina, Appellant.

Submitted June 11, 2007;

decided September 4, 2007

Reported below, 40 AD3d 14.

Motion for reconsideration of this Court’s May 8, 2007 dismissal order denied *[see 8*NY3d 978]. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

ANGELA SIMMONS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv689-WHA

)

LIBERTY NATIONAL LIFE ) 

INSURANCE COMPANY, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

Upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion to Change Venue (Doc. #5), filed on August

25, 2006, it is

ORDERED that the Plaintiff shall show cause, if any there be, on or before September

14, 2006 why the motion should not be granted. The motion will be taken under submission on

that day for determination without oral hearing.

DONE this 31st day of August, 2006.

/s/ W. Harold Albritton 

W. HAROLD ALBRITTON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00689-MEF-DRB Document 7 Filed 08/31/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### In the Matter of Curtis McRae, Appellant, v New York City Transit Authority, Respondent.

Submitted July 30, 2007;

decided October 18, 2007

Reported below, 39 AD3d 861.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed as untimely *(see*CPLR 5513 [b]).

Judge Jones taking no part.
# 5122.1704 Violations and remedies.

(c) The Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology) shall ensure that the contracting officer is provided with the report as described in FAR 22.1704(c).  See Appendix GG for further delegation. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 5122.17 - Combating Trafficking in Persons
From: O’Hare, Andrew <AOhare@cement.org>

To: Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 10/25/2010 12:00 PM

Subject: RE: Cement Correction Notice

Keith, 

Thank for the opportunity to review. Table 2 is still missing the opacity standard (20) under 

items 1 and 2. Otherwise, the preamble and rule text are clear to me. 

Do you plan to also clarify the compliance deadline language addressing the clinker production 

monitoring provisions in Sections 63.1350(d)(2) and 60.63(b)(2)?

Thanks,

Andy 

Andrew T. O'Hare, CAE

Vice President, Regulatory Affairs

Portland Cement Association

500 New Jersey, Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20001

Phone: (202) 408-9494

Fax: (202) 408-0877

Cell: (202) 270-0094

e-mail: aohare@cement.org

-----Original Message-----

From: Barnett.Keith@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Barnett.Keith@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 10:37 AM

To: O’Hare, Andrew

Cc: silverman.steven@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: Cement Correction Notice

Dear Andy:

I made corrections to the notice language based on comments. Please check this over again.

(See attached file: Cement Corrections for PCA-10-22.docx)
Still working on the schedule.

Keith W. Barnett

USEPA/OAQPS/SPPD/MMG

Mail Code D243-02

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

919-541-5605

barnett.keith@epa.gov
#### In the Matter of Mason & Hanger-Silas Mason Co., Inc., Appellant, *v.*S. E. Senior, as Chairman of the Workmen’s Compensation Board of the State of New York, Respondent.

Third Department,

December 23, 1966.

*31*Jarvis, Pilz <£ Norton (Emil V. Pilz*and *J. Edward Davey*of counsel), for appellant.

*Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Edwin R. Oberwager*and *Ruth Kessler Toch*of counsel), for respondent.

Staley, Jr., J.

This is an appeal from an order and judgment in an article 78 proceeding which dismissed the petition, and affirmed two assessments made by the Chairman of the Workmen’s Compensation Board under sections 15 (subd. 8, par. [h]), 25-a and 151 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law.

The appellant, as a self-insured employer during the fiscal year ending March 31, 1964, paid the sum of $64,804.81 as compensation benefits under the Workmen’s Compensation Law.

On December 23, 1964, the respondent made an assessment pursuant to provisions of sections 25-a and 151 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law and, on March 26, 1965, he made an assessment pursuant to provisions of section 15 (subd. 8, par. [h]) of the Workmen’s Compensation Law; both assessments were based on the total compensation payments made by the appellant during the fiscal year ending March 31, 1964.

Pursuant to the provisions of section 44 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, the appellant, during the fiscal year ending March 31, 1964, paid the sum of $55,895.42 as apportionment payments to insurance carriers or self-insurers of the claimant-employee’s last employer.

Appellant contends that the assessments under review were erroneous since the law provides that they may be based only upon “ compensation payments ” and that apportionment payments under section 44 are not such ‘ ‘ compensation payments. ’ ’

This court, in the companion case of *Matter of Insurance Company of North America*v. *Senior*(27 A D 2d 24), held that apportionment payments received by the insurance carrier of the last employer from prior employers, were deductible in computing the assessments under section 15 (subd. 8, par. [h]), 25-a, and 151 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law.

By reason of our decision in the *Matter of Insurance Company of North America*case, the assessments here were properly based on the total compensation payments made by the appellant dur*32mg the year involved including the apportionment payments made by it pursuant to section 44 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law.

The order and judgment should be affirmed.

Gibson, P. J., Reynolds and Aulisi, JJ., concur: Heblihy, J., concurs in the result.

Order and judgment affirmed, with costs.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of China Fortune Acquisition Corp. (the
“Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.    The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.    The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operation of the Company.




Date:
      June 30, 2009
            /s/
      Bo YuName:
            Bo
      YuTitle:
            Chief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)




/s/
      Yufeng ZhangName:
            Yufeng
      ZhangTitle:
            Chief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          14,801
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  635,616
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    157,021
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,239,027
<PP&E>                                       3,278,403
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,907,939
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,702,135
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         61
<COMMON>                                        83,738
<OTHER-SE>                                   (301,539)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,907,939
<SALES>                                      1,405,840
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,405,840
<CGS>                                          604,454
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,074,254
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (272,868)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (272,868)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (272,868)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN )

INSURANCE COMPANY, )

)

PLAINTIFFS-STAKEHOLDERS, )

)

V. ) Civil Action No.: CV-06-717.ID

)

CAROL THORN, et al., )

)

DEFENDANTS-CLAIMANTS. )

ANSWER OF DEFENDANT SOUTH BALDWIN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER

TO COMPLAINT

Comes now the Defendant sued as LV Stabler Memorial Hospital (correctly identified as

Greenville Hospital Corporation d/b/a LV Stabler Memorial Hospital , and for Answer to

Plaintiff’s Complaint says as follows:

 1. Without sufficient information to admit or deny, therefore denied.

 2. Without sufficient information to admit or deny, therefore denied.

 3. Without sufficient information to admit or deny, therefore denied.

 4. Without sufficient information to admit or deny, therefore denied.

 5. Without sufficient information to admit or deny, therefore denied.

 6. Without sufficient information to admit or deny, therefore denied.

 7. Without sufficient information to admit or deny, therefore denied.

 8. Without sufficient information to admit or deny, therefore denied.

 9. Without sufficient information to admit or deny, therefore denied.

Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 50 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 1 of 2
10. Admitted.

In addition , Defendant Hospital claims that it is entitled to an amount of the insurance

proceeds equal to the amount of benefits and services provided by it to the patients treated at its

facility.

/s/ Greer B. Mallette 

Richard E. Smith

Greer B. Mallette

Attorneys for defendant Greenville Hospital

Corporation d/b/a L.V. Stabler Memorial Hospital

OF COUNSEL:

CHRISTIAN & SMALL LLP

ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS

505 20TH STREET NORTH - SUITE 1800

BIRMINGHAM AL 35203-2696

(205) 795-6588

(205) 328-7234 Facsimile

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have this date served a copy of the foregoing pleading upon all

counsel of record in this cause by placing a copy of same in the United States mail, postage

prepaid, addressed as follows on this the 18th day of June , 2007:

Sidney W. Jackson, III

Jackson, Foster & Graham

P.O. Box 2225

R. Larry Bradford

Bradford & Sears, P.C.

2020 Canyon Road, Suite 100

Birmingham, AL 35216

/s/ Greer B. Mallette 

OF COUNSEL

Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 50 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 31.2 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)

I, Rod Lynam, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Gallery of History,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the quarter period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.



Date: May 15, 2007            /s/  ROD LYNAM
                                 _______________________
                                 Rod Lynam
                                 Chief Financial Office
#### In the Matter of the Claim of J. Carl Salisbury, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Herlihy, J.

Appeal by the claimant from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board. The board found that at the time claimant was receiving benefits he was a duly elected Town Assessor for which he was compensated. The claimant contends he assumed he was not required to report the form of work since it was not a “real job”. The board determined that the work rendered by the claimant to the town constituted employment and, therefore, he was ineligible for benefits paid, which were recoverable, and that he was further subject to a forfeiture of benefits. (See Labor Law, § 594; *Matter of Vick [Catherwood],*12 A D 2d 120.) Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., and Brink, JJ., concur with Herlihy, J.