alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION**     I, Brad Williams, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Ozark Ethanol, LLC;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of managers (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.     Date: November 29, 2007                                              /s/ Brad Williams   Brad Williams   Treasurer (principal financial officer)
EXHIBIT 10.4A


                                       August 27, 2001

Alan Lukas
16 Stapleford Drive
Falmouth, ME 04105

Dear Al:

      This letter will serve to formally confirm our mutual agreement
whereby you will leave your full-time Vice President - Product Development
position at Intelligent Controls, Inc. ( INCON ), to be effective September
14, 2001.  As discussed among the Directors, you will continue, for the
time being, to serve as Chairman of the Board and also be available, as
required, for up to 400 hours of consulting service, in total, per year.

      We have agreed that you will continue to receive base pay, on a bi-
weekly basis for twelve months, subject to a shortened time-frame in the
event you secure full-time employment, as called out in section 5 (b) 1 of
your employment agreement dated May 1, 1998. Your current annual base pay
rate is $133,000. In addition, all other provisions of section 5 (b) shall
apply. You will also continue to receive the Board/Consulting retainer,
which is currently paid quarterly, as per section 5 (b) 2 of your
employment agreement and the Company will make available health insurance
benefits to you and your family as required by section 5 (b) 2.

      INCON will provide on-going e-mail services and appropriate phone
messaging and forwarding support, if needed.  Other administrative services
can be made available, upon request, but it is not the mutual intent, after
a limited transition, that you maintain an office here.

      Alan, I look forward to your continued contributions to INCON's
success and wish you the best of luck with your new business activities.


                                       Very truly yours,

                                       /s/ Roger E. Brooks
                                       -------------------
                                       Roger E. Brooks
                                       President/CEO


Agreed and accepted:

/s/ Alan Lukas
--------------
Alan Lukas
Date:  9/9/01
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 335

AN ACT

To reauthorize the Congressional Award Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

S 335 ES

1 SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE CONGRESSIONAL

2 AWARD ACT.

3 (a) EXTENSION OF REQUIREMENTS REGARDING FI4 NANCIAL OPERATIONS OF CONGRESSIONAL AWARD PRO5 GRAM; NONCOMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS.—Section

6 104(c)(2)(A) of the Congressional Award Act (2 U.S.C.

7 804(c)(2)(A)) is amended by striking ‘‘and 2004’’ and in8 serting ‘‘2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009’’.

9 (b) TERMINATION.—

10 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 108 of the Congres11 sional Award Act (2 U.S.C. 808) is amended by

12 striking ‘‘October 1, 2004’’ and inserting ‘‘October

13 1, 2009’’.

14 (2) SAVINGS PROVISION.—During the period of

15 October 1, 2004, through the date of the enactment

16 of this section, all actions and functions of the Con17 gressional Award Board under the Congressional

18 Award Act (2 U.S.C. 801 et seq.) shall have the

19 same effect as though no lapse or termination of the

20 Board ever occurred.

21 (c) TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.—The Congressional

22 Award Act is amended—

23 (1) in section 103 (2 U.S.C. 803)—

24 (A) in subsection (a)(1) (B) and (C), by

25 striking ‘‘a a local’’ and inserting ‘‘a local’’; and
†

3

S 335 ES

1 (B) in subsection (b)(3)(B), by striking

2 ‘‘section’’ each place it appears and inserting

3 ‘‘subsection’’; and

4 (2) in section 104(c)(2)(A) (2 U.S.C.

5 804(c)(2)(A)), by inserting a comma after ‘‘1993’’.

Passed the Senate July 14, 2005.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 335

AN ACT

To reauthorize the Congressional Award Act.
935.071 Contract clause.       The contracting officer must insert the clause at 952.235-71, Research Misconduct, in contracts, including management and operating contracts, that involve research.    **Parent topic:** PART 935 - RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING
Case 2:06-cr-00179-MHT-CSC Document 22 Filed 02/02/2007 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00179-MHT-CSC Document 22 Filed 02/02/2007 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00179-MHT-CSC Document 22 Filed 02/02/2007 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00179-MHT-CSC Document 22 Filed 02/02/2007 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00179-MHT-CSC Document 22 Filed 02/02/2007 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00179-MHT-CSC Document 22 Filed 02/02/2007 Page 6 of 6
' 

In The Matter Of: 

SERVED: May 4, 2016 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0864 

Federal Express Corporation 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 2014SW700042 

Respondent 

ORDER SETTING PREHEARING CONFERENCE 

On April 4, 2016, the undersigned judge issued an Order Directing the Parties to Meet and 

Confer Regarding Litigation and Scheduling Issues in the above captioned case. 

On May 2, 2016, the parties submitted a Joint Response to the undersigned judge reporting 

on the results of their meeting. In the report, the parties suggested June 15, 2016 at 9am Central 

time for a telephonic prehearing conference. 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.205(a)(l) and (7), it is hereby ORDERED: 

1. The parties shall appear by telephone for a prehearing conference with the undersigned 

judge on June 15, 2016 at lOam Eastern time. 

2. The parties shall access the conference by dialing telephone number 888-204-5984 and 

then inputting access code 6392406 when prompted. 

3. During the conference, the parties shall be prepared to discuss the issues in dispute, the 

proposed litigation schedule, the status of any settlement negotiations, and any other 

related matters. 

::?~-- DOUGLAS M. RA WALD 

Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment: Service List 
SERVICE LIST - BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl 0001 

Greg Stofko, Respondent's Counsel 

1700 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. 

Suite 950 

Washington, D.C. 20006 

TEL: 202-393-9285 

FAX: 202-628-0654 

EMAIL: greg.stofko@fedex.com 

ONE COPY 

Allan H. Horowitz, Respondent's Counsel 

Dentons US LLP 

1900 K Street NW 

Washington, DC 20006 

TEL: 202-496-7356 

James Archier, Complainant's Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Enforcement Division, Southwest 

10101 Hillwood Parkway 

Fort Worth, TX 76177 

TEL: 817-222-5074 

FAX: 817-222-5945 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0864 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 
The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366~5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Lee Powe, Appellant.

In a *coram nobis*proceeding, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 6, 1969, which denied the application, after a hearing. Order reversed, on the law, and proceeding remitted to the Criminal Term for a further hearing and a new determination in accordance with the memorandum herein. No questions of fact were considered on this appeal. Defendant instituted the instant *coram nobis*application in an attempt to be resenteneed, alleging that he was not advised of his right to appeal and relying on the decisions in *People*v. *Montgomery*(24 N Y 2d 130) and *People*v. *Callaway*(24 N Y 2d 127). The Criminal Term denied the application, after a hearing, as a matter of law, on the ground that the instant case was distinguishable from *Montgomery*and *Callaway (supra).*The defendants in *Montgomery*and *Callaway (supra)*were convicted after trial and were still serving their sentences at the time of their respective *coram nobis*applications. By way of contrast, the defendant herein had been convicted upon his plea of guilty in 1945 and has completed serving his sentence at the time of his application in 1969. Such distinctions cannot serve as a basis for denying defendant’s application *(People*v. *Brown,*33 A D 2d 1031). Furthermore, the Criminal Term did not determine the question of whether defendant was advised of his right to appeal at the time he was sentenced in 1946. A determination of this issue must be made at the rehearing (cf. *People*v. *Marvin,*26 N Y 2d 656). Christ, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins and Munder, JJ., concur. (Beldock, P. J., deceased.)
#### DESSAR v. HIRSCH.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 19, 1914.)

Action by Leo C. Dessar against Charles S. Hirsch.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs. Order filed. See, also, 147 N. Y. Supp. 1107.
Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 27 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 1 of 1
CERTIFICATIONI, Kokmeng Koh, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-Drequired to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K ofPrincipal Life Income Fundings Trust 23 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and otherinformation required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by thisreport is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required inthis report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the ExchangeAct period reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement(s) in all material respects; and  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be includedin this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A. and Bankers Trust Company, N.A.Date: March 28, 2007   /s/ Kokmeng Koh     Kokmeng Koh  Second Vice President
### Attachment V I

Air Quality Monitoring
#### EISENBACH v. MUTUAL LIFE INS. CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 19, 1914.)

Action by Henrietta Eisenbach against the Mutual Life Insurance Company.

No opinion. Motion granted. Questions certified. Order filed. See, also, 147 N. Y. Supp. 962.
#### In the Matter of Stephen J. Williams (Admitted as Stephen John Williams), an Attorney, Appellant. Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Respondent.

Submitted July 23, 2007;

decided September 18, 2007

Reported below, 33 AD3d 38.

Motion for reargument denied *[see*8 NY3d 1007].
EXTENSION AGREEMENT #2
 
 THIS EXTENSION AGREEMENT #2 is dated for reference and effective as of April 30, 2011.
 
 BETWEEN:
 
 HUBEI MINKANG PHARMACEUTICAL LTD.
 
 and
 
 HBMK LIMITED
 
 WHEREAS the parties are party to a Letter of Intent, dated September 27, 2010, which was fully executed on October 18, 2010;
 
 AND WHEREAS the parties have been unable to enter into a Formal Agreement by November 15, 2010;
 
 AND WHEREAS Section 13 of the Letter of Intent provides among other things that if the parties have not entered into a Formal Agreement on or before November 15, 2010, then either party may terminate the Letter of Intent and that the Letter of Intent shall have no force and effect unless the deadline date for entering into a Formal Agreement is extended as may be mutually agreed to by the parties in writing for a maximum of 14 days per extension.
 
 AND WHEREAS the parties are each a party to an Extension Agreement dated March 10, 2011, but having an effective date of November 15, 2010 (the “Extension Agreement”), which extended the deadline date for entering into a Formal Agreement to on or before April 30, 2011.
 
 NOW THEREFORE for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto covenant and agree as follows:
 
 1.Since the parties have not entered into a Formal Agreement on or before November 15, 2010, or by the Extension Agreement deadline date of April 30, 2011, the parties hereby agree to extend the deadline date for entering into a Formal Agreement to on or before May 14, 2011.
 
 2.The deadline date in Section 13 of the Letter of Intent shall be extended to May 14, 2011.
 
 3.All other terms and conditions of the Letter of Intent shall remain in full force and effect.
 
 4.This Extension Agreement #2 may be executed in original or counterpart form, delivered by facsimile or otherwise, and when executed by the parties as aforesaid, shall be deemed to constitute one agreement and shall take effect as such.
 
 
 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF each of the Parties hereto has hereunto executed this Extension Agreement #2 as set forth on the front page of this Extension Agreement #2.


HUBEI MINKANG
)PHARMACEUTICAL LTD.
)))Per:   /s/ Hsien Loong Wong
)Authorized Signatory
))Hsien Loong Wong, Director
)(print name and title)







HBMK LIMITED
))))Per:   /s/ Lee Tong Tai
)Authorized Signatory
))Lee Tong Tai, Director
)(print name and title)
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 42 Filed 05/22/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 42 Filed 05/22/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 42 Filed 05/22/2007 Page 3 of 3
§ 958.71 Termination. ( a ) The Secretary may at any time terminate the provisions of this subpart by giving at least one day's notice by means of a press release or in any other manner which he may determine.
( b ) The Secretary may terminate or suspend the operations of any or all of the provisions of this subpart whenever he finds that such provisions do not tend to effectuate the declared policy of the act.
( c ) The Secretary shall terminate the provisions of this subpart at the end of any fiscal period whenever he finds that such termination is favored by a majority of producers who, during a representative period, have been engaged in the production for market of onions: *Provided,* That such majority has, during such representative period, produced for market more than fifty percent of the volume of such onions produced for market, but such termination shall be effective only if announced on or before May 31 of the then current fiscal period.
( d ) The provisions of this subpart shall, in any event, terminate whenever the provisions of the act authorizing them cease to be in effect.
Exhibit
        32
 
  **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
  **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  In
        connection with the annual report of China Biotechnology, Inc. (the "Company")
        on Form 10-KSB for the year ending July 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Xu Han, Chief
        Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
  Xu
        Han
 Chief
        Executive Officer
 Chief
        Financial Officer
  November
        14, 2007
Subpart 5241.2 - ACQUIRING UTILITY

SERVICES

Parent topic: Part 5241 - ACQUISITION OF UTILITY SERVICES

5241.201 Policy.

(c) Contracts for the operation of Government-owned facilities by a DON contractor that call for

reimbursement of the contractor's utility expense shall specifically provide for the submission of

utility subcontracts to NAVFACENGCOM for comment or approval prior to execution of the contract.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2904 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on sodium esters of 

parahydroxybenzoic acid. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 19, 2006 

Mr. BURR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on sodium 

esters of parahydroxybenzoic acid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ESTERS AND SODIUM ESTERS OF 

4 PARAHYDROXYBENZOIC ACID. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.75 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 esters and sodium esters of parahydroxybenzoic acid) is 

8 amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/ 

9 2009’’. 


dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•S 2904 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 96-20302 Summary Calendar

__________________

CALVIN LYNN MARTIN,
Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus
R.L. BAKER, Sgt.,
Defendant-Appellee.

______________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Texas

(CA-H-94-767)

______________________________________________

October 18, 1996
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Calvin Lynn Martin, Texas prisoner # 687496, appeals the

district court’s order granting Baker’s motion for summary judgment

and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Martin argues that

Baker’s summary judgment evidence was insufficient to show that he2

was entitled to summary judgment, that there is a genuine issue of

material fact as to whether Baker used excessive force and violated

his constit utional rights, and that Baker is not entitled to
qualified immunity. Martin failed to present any summary judgment

evidence to support his allegation that Baker is not entitled to
qualified immunity. Martin failed to meet his summary judgment
burden of proof to show that there is a genuine issue of material
fact that precludes the granting of summary judgment. Therefore,

the district court did not err in granting Baker’s motion for
summary judgment. S ee Little v. Liquid Air Corp. , 37 F.3 d 1069,
1075 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.
§ 923.64 Termination. ( a ) The Secretary may at any time terminate the provisions of this part by giving at least one day's notice by means of a press release or in any other manner in which he may determine.
( b ) The Secretary shall terminate or suspend the operation of any and all of the provisions of this part whenever he finds that such provisions do not tend to effectuate the declared policy of the act.
( c ) The Secretary shall terminate the provisions of this part whenever it is found that such termination is favored by a majority of growers who, during a representative period, have been engaged in the production of cherries: *Provided,* that such majority has, during such representative period, produced for market more than 50 percent of the volume of such cherries produced for market.
( d ) The Secretary shall conduct a referendum six years after the effective date of this section and every sixth year thereafter, to ascertain whether continuance of this subpart is favored by growers. The Secretary may terminate the provisions of this subpart at the end of any fiscal period in which the Secretary has found that continuance of this subpart is not favored by growers who, during a representative period determined by the Secretary, have been engaged in the production of cherries in the production area.
( e ) The provisions of this part shall, in any event, terminate whenever the provisions of the act authorizing them cease to be in effect.
[22 FR 3835, June 1, 1957, as amended at 70 FR 44252, Aug. 2, 2005]