alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 4.1


 


SUNBURST ACQUISITIONS V INC


A COLORADO CORPORATION


700,000,000 SHARES COMMON STOCK, NO PAR VALUE


 


This certifies that __________________________________________ is hereby issued _____________________________________________ fully paid and non-assessable Shares of Common Stock of Sunburst Acqisitions V Inc. transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof, in person or by duly authorized Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.







In Witness Whereof, Sunburst Acqisitions V Inc. has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers and its Corporate Seal to be hereunto affixed as of this ______ day of __________________ 20_____.


 


 


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
President

	
 

	
Secretary
#### § 52.45 Inspection fees when charges for sampling have not been collected.

For any lot of processed products from which a sample is drawn by a licensed sampler and the sampling fee is not collected by the appropriate authority as provided in § 52.43, the fees and charges for inspection services with respect to such lot shall be the applicable fees and charges prescribed in § 52.42.

[48 FR 12326, Mar. 24, 1983]
252.239-7009 Representation of Use of Cloud Computing.       As prescribed in                 239.7604             (a), use the following provision:          REPRESENTATION OF USE OF CLOUD COMPUTING (SEP 2015)          (a)  *Definition.*  “Cloud computing,” as used in this provision, means a model for enabling ubiquitous, convenient, on-demand network access to a shared pool of configurable computing resources (e.g., networks, servers, storage, applications, and services) that can be rapidly provisioned and released with minimal management effort or service provider interaction.  This includes other commercial terms, such as on-demand self-service, broad network access, resource pooling, rapid elasticity, and measured service.  It also includes commercial offerings for software-as-a-service, infrastructure-as-a-service, and platform-as-a-service.          (b)  The Offeror shall indicate by checking the appropriate blank in paragraph (c) of this provision whether the use of cloud computing is anticipated under the resultant contract.          (c)  *Representation.*  The Offeror represents that it—          _____ Does anticipate that cloud computing services will be used in the performance of any contract or subcontract resulting from this solicitation.          _____ Does not anticipate that cloud computing services will be used in the performance of any contract or subcontract resulting from this solicitation.          (End of provision)    **Parent topic:** 252.239 RESERVED
#### § 959.9 Producer.

*Producer* means any person engaged in a proprietary capacity in the production of onions for market.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3149 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-piece or 5-piece fireplace tools of 

iron or steel. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. CHAMBLISS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-piece or 5-piece 

fireplace tools of iron or steel. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 4-PIECE OR 5-PIECE FIREPLACE TOOLS OF 

4 IRON OR STEEL. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.82.05 4-piece or 5-piece fireplace tools of iron 

or steel (provided for in subheading 

8205.51.30) ............................................. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 3149 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
§ 981.49 Board estimates and recommendations. To aid the Secretary in fixing the salable and reserve percentages, the Board shall furnish to the Secretary, not later than September 1, the following estimates (kernel weight basis) and recommendations for the crop year, each of which, or any later revisions thereof, shall be adopted by the affirmative vote of at least six members: ( a ) The quantity of marketable almonds to be produced;
( b ) The estimated handler carryover and the estimated reserve inventory as of July 31;
( c ) The desirable handler carryover and the probable reserve inventory at the end of the crop year;
( d ) The trade demand, taking into consideration anticipated imports, economic conditions and the anticipated market price (within the limitations of the act); and
( e ) The recommended salable and reserve percentages to be established.
The Board shall also furnish to the Secretary a complete report of the proceedings of the Board meeting at which the recommended salable and reserve percentages were considered. If, for any reason, the Board fails to make these estimates or to recommend to the Secretary salable and reserve percentages as required hereby, reports representing the views of members with respect to such matters may be submitted to the Secretary who may act on the basis of such reports or other information available to him. [35 FR 11372, July 16, 1970, as amended at 41 FR 26853, June 30, 1976; 61 FR 32921, June 26, 1996; 89 FR 37968, May 7, 2024]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 290 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 290

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
                 certain hazard mitigation assistance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 3, 2005

    Mr. Bond (for himself, Mr. Talent, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Vitter, Ms. 
    Landrieu, Mr. Nelson of Florida, and Mr. Conrad) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
                 certain hazard mitigation assistance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME FOR CERTAIN DISASTER MITIGATION 
              PAYMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 139 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to disaster relief payments) is amended by adding at the end 
the following new subsection:
    ``(g) Certain Disaster Mitigation Payments.--Gross income shall not 
include the value of any amount received directly or indirectly as 
payment or benefit by the owner of any property for hazard mitigation 
with respect to the property pursuant to the Robert T. Stafford 
Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act or the National Flood 
Insurance Act.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years ending on or after December 31, 2004.
                                 <all>
```
Case 2:06-cv-00652-MHT-WC Document 2 Filed 07/21/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00652-MHT-WC Document 2 Filed 07/21/2006 Page 2 of 2
#### FARLEY, State Com'r of Excise, Appellant, v. MONSEES et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 26, 1914.)

Action by William W. Parley, as State Commissioner of Excise, etc., against John Monsees and others.

C. R. O'Connor, of Hobart, for appellant.

L. W. Harburger, of New York City, for respondents.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Order filed.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 (the Report) of The Peoples BancTrust Company, Inc.
(the Company), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby each certify that to the best of our knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered
in the Report.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Elam P. Holley, Jr.                             
|Elam P. Holley, Jr.                                 
|President and Chief Executive Officer               
|                                                    
|/s/ Andrew C. Bearden, Jr.                          
|Andrew C. Bearden, Jr.                              
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



May 13, 2004

(Date)



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request. The information furnished herein shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.
Case 1:06-cv-00708-CSC Document 45 Filed 10/10/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### § 917.36 Expenses.

Each commodity committee is authorized to incur such expenses as the Secretary finds are reasonable and are likely to be incurred by the said commodity committee during each fiscal period for the maintenance and functioning of such committee, including its proportionate share of the expenses of the Control Committee; and for such research and service activities relating to handling of the fruit for which the commodity committee was established as the Secretary may determine to be appropriate. The funds to cover such expenses shall be acquired by the levying of assessments as provided in § 917.37.

###### Effective Date Note

#### Effective Date Note:

At 76 FR 66605, Oct. 27, 2011, § 917.36 was suspended indefinitely, effective Oct. 28, 2011.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-20326

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TONY CHARLES RICHARD,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(H-00-CR-785-1)

- - - - - - - - - - January 4, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Defendant-Appellant Tony Charles Richard appeals his sentence,

following a guilty plea, for two counts of unauthorized use of an

access device, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a). Richard

contends that the district court erred in departing upwardly under

the Sentencing Guidelines and imposing a prison term of 54 months,

when the Probation Office had calculated a guideline imprisonment

range of 30 to 37 months.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in upwardly

departing from the applicable guideline range. U nited States v.2

Ashburn

, 38 F.3d 803, 807 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc). In concluding

that Richard’s criminal history category did not adequately reflect

the seriousness of his past criminal conduct, the court was

entitled to rely on Richard’s prior arrests for unadjudicated

offenses, as detailed in Richard’s Presen tence Report (“PSR”).

See U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3. Relying on PSR information that Richard has

not shown to be “materially untrue,” the court determined that

R ichard had attempted to avoid prosecution for these acts

.

See Uni ted States v. Shipley , 963 F.2d 56, 59 (5th Cir. 1992);

U.S.S.G. § 6A1.3. The court also concluded that recidivism was

likely, based on Richard’s having been charged with and convicted

of repeated offenses involving c urrency theft and credit cards,

offenses that are similar to his crimes of conviction in the

instant case. S ee United States v. Harrington

, 114 F.3d 517, 519-

20 (5th Cir. 1999).

AFFIRMED.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3312 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain color flat panel screen monitors. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 26, 2006 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mrs. CLINTON) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain color flat panel 

screen monitors. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COLOR FLAT PANEL SCREEN MONITORS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.85.28 Color flat panel screen monitors, with a 

video display diagonal of 43.18 cm or 

48.26 cm, of a kind used as analog display devices in video security systems 

(provided for in subheading 8528.12.72) Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 3312 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

ROY EDWARD PIKE, #079888, )

)

 Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-CV-668-MHT

)

ARNOLD HOLT, et al., )

)

 

ORDER ON MOTION

Upon consideration of the motion for extension of time filed by the plaintiff on

August 7, 2006 (Court Doc. No. 5), and for good cause, it is

ORDERED that this motion be and is hereby GRANTED to the extent allowed by

this order. It is further

ORDERED that the plaintiff is GRANTED an extension from August 9, 2006 to and

including August 29, 2006 to file an objection to the Recommendation. 

Done this 14 day of August, 2006. th

/s/ Delores R. Boyd

DELORES R. BOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

 

Case 2:06-cv-00668-MHT-DRB Document 6 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 1 of 1
Subpart 905.5 - Paid Advertisements

Parent topic: PART 905 - PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONS

905.502 Authority.

(a) Newspapers. When it is deemed necessary to use paid advertisements in newspapers and trade

journals, written authority for such publication shall be obtained from the Head of the Contracting

Activity or designee.
Filed 4/23/ 21 P. v. Vargas CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication

or or dered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

BENJAMIN TRUJILLO VARGAS,

Defendant and Appellant. H048350

(Monterey County

Super. Ct. No. 18CR005670)

Defendant Benjamin Trujillo Vargas appeals from the judgment entered following

his admission that he violated probation. Appointed counsel filed an opening brief

summarizing the case but raising no issues. Counsel notified d efendant o f his right to file

a supplemental brief on his own behalf and defendant has not done so. Having reviewed

the entire record , we see no arguable appellate issue. We therefore briefly describe the

proceedings and then a ffirm the judgment. (See People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436,

440

– 441 ; People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 110.)

Defendant pleaded no contest in 2018 to possessing a controlled substance for sale

(Health & Saf. Code, § 11351) and possessing a short

- b arreled rifle or shotgun (Pen.

Code, § 33215). He was granted probation with conditions including 180 days in county

jail

. I n February 2020, the District Attorney alleged defendant violated his probation by

smoking marijuana in a public place (in violation of Health and Saf

. Code

, § 11362.3)

.

Defendant admitted the violation and the court terminated probation. Defendant was

sentenced to the middle term of three years on the possession for sale count and the2

middle term of two years for the firearm possession, to be served concurrently (with 381

days of custody credit)

. The court imposed a $600 restitution fund fine and, because

pro bation had been revoked, ordered payment of a previously suspended $600 probation

revocation fine.

Defendant timely filed a notice of appeal on his own behalf.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirm ed.____________________________________

Grover, J.

WE CONCUR:

____________________________

Greenwood, P. J.

____________________________

Danner , J

.

H04 8350

- The People v. Vargas
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**GLOBAL
      DEVELOPMENT INC.**


**FORM
      10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




I
      am the
      Chief Executive Officer of Global Development Inc., a Delaware corporation
      (the
      "Company"). I am delivering this certificate in connection with the Form 10-K
      of
      the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005 and filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission ("Form 10-K").




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
      the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
      in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
                November 29, 2006
              
              
              /s/
                John Briner
              
              John
                Briner
              Chief
                Executive Officer
Exhibit 12.1
  Education
    Management LLC
  Computation
    of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (Unaudited)
  Predecessor



SuccessorJuly 1, 2005



June 1, 2005Year Ended


Year Ended


through



through


Year Ended


Year EndedJune 30,


June 30,


May 31,



June 30,


June 30,


June 30,2004


2005


2006



2006


2007


2008(Dollars in millions)Computation of fixed chargesInterest expense


2.2



1.3



0.8




13.8



175.2



164.1Amortization of debt issuance costs


0.5



0.4



1.3




0.6



7.7



7.7Portion of rental expense representative of interest


16.9



19



18.5




1.9



22.3



27.1Total fixed charges

$
19.5


$
20.7


$
20.6



$
16.3


$
205.2


$
198.9Computation of earnings (loss)Income (loss) before income taxes

$
130.5


$
168.8


$
174.0



$
(32.1
)

$
59.3


$
105.8Fixed charges per above


19.5



20.7



20.6




16.3



205.2



198.9Total earnings (loss)

$
150.1


$
189.5


$
194.6



$
(15.8
)

$
264.5


$
304.7Ratio of earnings (loss) to fixed charges


7.7



9.2



9.4




(1.0
)


1.3



1.5     *
    
    Earnings for the period June 1 through June 30, 2006 were
    inadequate to cover fixed charges by $32.1. 141
Case 2:06-cv-00679-LES-CSC Document 2 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00679-LES-CSC Document 2 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 2 of 2
#### § 75.35 Obtaining samples for lot inspections.

Samples of seed for lot inspections may be obtained by licensed inspectors or authorized employees of the Department.
17.9101 Policy.

(a) The cognizant requirements office develops and initiates the Product Loan Agreement (PLA)

using the instructions and automated application available at:

https://cmis.disa.mil/facilities/vendorloan/vendorloan.cfm .

(b) The contracting officer is the only individual authorized to enter into, administer, and terminate

Product Loan Agreements on behalf of the Government. Unauthorized signatures on Product Loan

Agreements may result in Anti-Deficiency Act violations.

Parent topic: SUBPART 17.91 — PRODUCT LOAN AGREEMENTS
52.236-28 Preparation of Proposals-Construction.       As prescribed in 36.520, insert the following provision:          Preparation of Proposals-Construction (Oct 1997)                                       (a) 						            Proposals must be (1) submitted on the forms furnished by the Government or on copies of those forms; and (2) manually signed. The person signing a proposal must initial each erasure or change appearing on any proposal form.                                          (b) 						            The proposal form may require offerors to submit proposed prices for one or more items on various bases, including-                                                         (1) 								                Lump sum price;                                                            (2) 								                Alternate prices;                                                            (3) 								                Units of construction; or                                                            (4) 								                Any combination of paragraphs (b)(1) through (b)(3) of this provision.                                                                             (c) 						            If the solicitation requires submission of a proposal on all items, failure to do so may result in the proposal being rejected without further consideration. If a proposal on all items is not required, offerors should insert the words "no proposal" in the space provided for any item on which no price is submitted.                                          (d) 						            Alternate proposals will not be considered unless this solicitation authorizes their submission.                                 (End of provision)    **Parent topic:** 52.236 [Reserved]
§ 636.14 Misrepresentation and scheme or device. ( a ) A participant who is determined to have erroneously represented any fact affecting a program determination made in accordance with this part, will not be entitled to cost-share agreement payments and must refund to NRCS all payments and pay liquidated damages, plus interest, as determined by NRCS.
( b ) A participant will refund to NRCS all payments, plus interest, as determined by NRCS, with respect to all NRCS cost-share agreements to which they are a party if they are determined to have knowingly: ( 1 ) Adopted any scheme or device that tends to defeat the purpose of the program;
( 2 ) Made any fraudulent representation; or
( 3 ) Misrepresented any fact affecting a program determination.
( c ) Other NRCS cost-share agreements where this person is a participant may be terminated.