alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         160,682
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,638
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      43,539,972
<DEPRECIATION>                              19,911,248
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,001,922
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,646,901
<BONDS>                                     32,637,768
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (21,165,139)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,001,922
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,528,202
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  714,224
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             947,905
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (605,746)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (605,746)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (605,746)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (29.12)
        

</TABLE>
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3120 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain parts and accessories of 

measuring or checking instruments. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain parts and 

accessories of measuring or checking instruments. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN PARTS AND ACCESSORIES OF MEAS4 URING OR CHECKING INSTRUMENTS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 3120 IS 

‘‘ 9902.90.31 Parts and accessories of instruments and 

apparatus for measuring or checking 

electrical quantities, specially designed 

for telecommunications (provided for in 

subheading 9030.90.88), not including 

printed circuit assemblies (provided for 

in subheading 9030.90.88) ...................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply with respects to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Paul Martin, Appellant.

Motion for permission to proceed as a poor person and assignment of counsel upon appeal from a judgment of conviction rendered in County Court of Columbia County denied. (See *People*v. *Martin,*24 A D 2d 528; 26 A D 2d 852.) Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur.
Subpart 5643.1 - GENERAL

Parent topic: Part 5643 - CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS

5643.105 Availability of Funds

(Revised October 2012)

(c)

(1) Prior to issuing a modification that affects contract funding after the contract is physically

complete, for which the appropriations may be either expired, cancelled, or closed, contracting

officers must coordinate the action with the servicing Comptroller Office to ensure fund availability

and prevent improper or illegal adjustments to cancelled appropriations. The contract file must

contain documentation of the coordination efforts.

(2) Contracting officers will coordinate all modifications to contracts with expired, cancelled, or

closed appropriation with the serving legal office prior to execution.

(d) Modifications must not be executed for the purpose of using or redistributing unspent balances

of expired, closed, or cancelled appropriations without prior coordination with the serving legal

office.

HQ, United States Special Operations Command

Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L)

SOFARS 5643

February 2007
1401.7001-5 Acquisition Management Reviews.       Acquisition Management Reviews (AMRs) are to be conducted using the Government Accountability Office's (GAO) “Framework for Assessing the Acquisition Function at Federal Agencies” available at *http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05218g.pdf.*    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1401.70 - Acquisition Reviews
#### In the Matter of Henry S. Howard, Attorney, Respondent. Committee on Professional Standards, Third Judicial Department, Petitioner.

Respondent who was admitted to practice by this court on Janu*934ary 14, 1937, was convicted in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York on April 12, 1978 of the Federal felony of willfully and knowingly attempting to evade payment of income taxes due the United States of America by filing a false and fraudulent income tax return in violation of section 7201 of title 26 of the United States Code. By order of this court, dated July 26, 1978, respondent’s name was struck from the roll of attorneys pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law and *Matter of Chu*(42 NY2d 490). Chapter 674 of the Laws of 1979, effective July 13, 1979, amended subdivision 4 of section 90 by limiting the mandatory disbarment effect of *Chu*to those Federal felonies which would constitute felonies under the laws of this State. By petition sworn to September 26, 1979, respondent applied to be reinstated and for a hearing, pursuant to section 3 of chapter 674 of the Laws of 1979, on the. ground that the Federal crime of which he had been convicted does not constitute a felony under New York law. By order dated October 18, 1979, we deemed our prior order of July 26, 1978 an order of suspension, directed petitioner to file an amended petition of charges containing factual allegations of the misconduct which led to and resulted in respondent’s conviction and referred the proceeding for a hearing and report. The hearing Judge has now filed a report in which he notes that, prior to *Chu,*the customary sanction imposed upon an attorney for attempting to evade payment of income taxes by filing a false and fraudulent tax return was a suspension (see, e.g., *Matter of Spira,*14 AD2d 19). While not condoning respondent’s actions, the hearing Judge recommends that the original order of disbarment be converted to an order of suspension *nunc pro tunc*with such sanctions as the court deems appropriate and that favorable consideration be given to respondent’s application for reinstatement. In effect, respondent has been suspended from the practice of law since July 26, 1978, the date of our order striking his name from the roll of attorneys. Under all the circumstances, we determine that the period of suspension already served is sufficient punishment for respondent’s misconduct in this matter. Therefore, respondent’s application for reinstatement is granted and respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor at law upon entry of an order in accordance herewith. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Kane and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Billy Wayne Marcy, Appellant

No. 06-14-00155-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 6th District Court of Red 

River County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

CR01988). Opinion delivered by Justice 

Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the 

judgment of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgment to delete the 

attorney fees assessed. As modified, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

We note that the appellant, Billy Wayne Marcy, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JANUARY 27, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
#### § 986.30 Person.

*Person* means an individual, partnership, corporation, association, or any other business unit.
|                                      |
|--------------------------------------|
|                                      |  |
| Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas | BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware |
| As Indenture Trustee                 | As Owner Trustee |
| Attn:  Michelle H.Y. Voon  | Attn:  Kristine Gullo |
| 100 Plaza One 6th Floor         | 301 Bellevue Parkway 3rd Floor |
| Jersey City, NY 07311                | Wilmington, DE  19809 |

|                                                 |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                                 |  |
| The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. | Ally Auto Assets LLC |
| Attn:  Robert Castle                  | Ally Financial Inc. |
| 2 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1020              | 200 Renaissance Center |
| Chicago, IL  60602                    | 10th Floor, MC 482-B10-A68 |
|                                            | Detroit, MI |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| Re:    | Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2012-5 |
|   | Annual Statement as to Compliance |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| a. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period of January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014, and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has been under his supervision, and |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| b. | To the best of his knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement throughout such period. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | Very truly yours, |
|   |   |
|   | /s/ David J. DeBrunner |   |
|   | David J. DeBrunner |
|   | Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |
|   | Ally Financial Inc. |
```

[109th Congress Public Law 275]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ275.109]

[[Page 120 STAT. 775]]

Public Law 109-275
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 100 Pitcher Street in Utica, New York, as the ``Captain George A. Wood 
     Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Aug. 17, 2006 -  [H.R. 4962]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CAPTAIN GEORGE A. WOOD POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 100 Pitcher Street in Utica, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Captain George A. Wood Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Captain 
George A. Wood Post Office Building''.

    Approved August 17, 2006.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4962:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):
            July 18, considered and passed House.
            Aug. 2, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
SUBPART 6.2 — FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES     **Parent topic:** PART 6 –– COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS6.202 Establishing or maintaining alternative sources.    (b)(1) Approval authority for determinations and findings (D&Fs) under this subpart follows:       Estimated Value of Justification                   Approving Official ofD&F$750K and below                   Contracting OfficerOver $750K to $15M                   COCOOver $15M to $100M                   HCAOver $100M                   SPESee DFARS 206.2 for D&F format. Legal Counsel and Procuring Activity Competition Advocate (PACA) or Agency Competition Advocate (ACA) coordination is required before approval. Provide the PACA with a copy of the approved D&F.
EXHIBIT 32.2 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
               RULE 13a-14(b)

In connection with the Quarter Report of Gallery of History, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Rod Lynam, Chief Financial Office of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

1.	 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Rod Lynam
-------------
Rod Lynam
Chief Financial Officer

August 14, 2008
922.807 Exemptions.

(c) Contracting officer requests for exemption from E.O. 11246 should be directed to the

Procurement Executive for submission to the Director, OFCCP.

Parent topic: Subpart 922.8 - Equal Employment Opportunity
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CHRISTINE BENNETT, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.:

v ) 1:06-CV-723-MHT

)

ARMY FLEET SUPPORT )

SERVICES, LLC, )

)

Defendant. )

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

Comes now, Ethan R. Dettling, of the law firm Wiggins, Childs, Quinn &

Pantazis, L.L.C, The Kress Building, 301 19

th St. N., Birmingham, Alabama 35203,

and hereby appears as counsel for the Plaintiff in the above-styled case.

Respectfully submitted,

s/Ethan R. Dettling

Jon C. Goldfarb (ASB-5401-F58J)

Ethan R. Dettling (ASB-9067-T68E)

Counsel for Plaintiff

OF COUNSEL:

Wiggins, Childs, Quinn & Pantazis, LLC

The Kress Building

301 19

th Street North

Birmingham, Alabama 35203

Telephone No.: (205) 314-0500

Facsimile No.: (205) 254-1500

Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 12 Filed 09/15/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing

document has been properly filed with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system

which will send electronic notification to the following counsel of record:

Kirk Cordell Shaw

Mary Carol Ladd

Ambrecht Jackson LLP

PO Box 290

Mobile, AL 36601-0290

251-405-1302

Fax: 251-432-6843

Email: kcs@ajlaw.com

Email: mcl@ajlaw.com

on this the 15

th

day of September , 2006.

s/Ethan R. Dettling

OF COUNSEL

Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 12 Filed 09/15/2006 Page 2 of 2
#### FOWLER, Appellant, v. DURHAM, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 8, 1906.)

Action by Louise R. Fowler, as executrix, etc., of George R. Fowler, deceased, against Northrup Durham.

No opinion. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with Costs.
749.111-71 Required review and approval.       (a) *When required.* The USAID Settlement Review Board shall receive and approve all USAID/W and Mission proposed settlements or determinations if:          (1) The amount of settlement, by agreement or determination, involves $100,000 or more;          (2) The settlement or determination is limited to adjustment of the fee of a cost-reimbursement contract or subcontract and:          (i)  			In the case of complete termination, the fee, as adjusted, with respect to the terminated portion of the contract or subcontract is $100,000 or more; or (ii) in the case of a partial termination, the fee, as adjusted, with respect to the terminated portion of the contract or subcontract is $100,000 or more;          (3) The head of the contracting activity concerned determines that a review of a specific case or class of cases is desirable; or          (4) The contracting officer, in his/her discretion, desires review by the board.          (b) *Level of review.* Proposed settlements in excess of $5 million shall be reviewed and approved by a board consisting of the M/OAA Director, the General Counsel, and the Controller, without power of redelegation.          (c) *Submission of information.* The contracting officer shall submit to the board a statement of the proposed settlement agreement or determination, supported by such detailed information as is required for an adequate review. This information should normally include copies of:          (1)  			The contractor's or subcontractor's settlement proposal, (2) the audit report, (3) the property disposal report and any required approvals in connection therewith, and (4) the contracting officer's memorandum explaining the settlement. The board may, in its discretion, require the submission of additional information.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 749.1—General Principles
EX-35 (b)
(logo) GMAC Mortgage

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (Item 1123)

GMAC Mortgage, LLC

DBALT06AR4


The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of GMAC Mortgage, LLC, as servicer
(the "Servicer") pursuant to the applicable servicing agreement, does hereby
certify that:

1. A review of the Servicer's activities during the period covered by the
Issuing Entity's report on Form 10-K and of the Servicer's performance under the
applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material
respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 6th
day of March 2007.


By: /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
Title: Executive Vice President



GMAC Mortgage, LLC
500 Enterprise Road
Horsham, PA 19044

www.gmacmortgage.com
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Xuedong Hu, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Alpha Spacecom, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. I am responsible for  establishing  and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures  (as defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and  15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



a) Designed such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure controls and  procedures  to be designed  under my  supervision,  to ensure that material  information  relating  to the small  business  issuer,  including  its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Omitted;



c)  Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  small  business  issuer's  disclosure controls and procedures  and presented in this report my  conclusions  about the effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business  issuer's  internal control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the small  business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has  materially  affected,  or is reasonably  likely to materially  affect,  the small business  issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial  reporting,  to the small  business  issuer's  auditors  and the audit committee  of the  small  business  issuer's  board  of  directors  (or  persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably likely to  adversely  affect  the small  business  issuer's  ability  to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other employees who have a significant  role in the small business  issuer's  internal control over financial reporting.

May 21, 2004

/s/ Xuedong Hu

Name:  Xuedong Hu

Title:  Chief Executive Officer
Case 2:06-cv-00616-MHT-SRW Document 13-7 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00616-MHT-SRW Document 13-7 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00616-MHT-SRW Document 13-7 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00616-MHT-SRW Document 13-7 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00616-MHT-SRW Document 13-7 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00616-MHT-SRW Document 13-7 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 6 of 6
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2849 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain sports shoes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 18, 2006 

Mr. BROWNBACK introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain sports shoes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN SPORTS SHOES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.64.15 Sports footwear; tennis 

shoes, basketball shoes, gym 

shoes, training shoes and the 

like, all the foregoing with 

outer soles of rubber or plastics and uppers of textile 

materials for women (provided for in subheading 

6404.11.20) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•S 2849 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
162 So.2d 15

#### KING FINANCE COMPANY OF LOUISIANA, INC., and King Discount Company of Louisiana, Inc. v. FIREMAN’S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 47157.

April 1, 1964.

Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit.

159 So.2d 708.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.