alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 984.472 Reports of walnuts, received, shipped, and committed. ( a ) Reports of walnuts shipped during a month shall be submitted to the Board on California Walnut Board (CWB) Form No. 6 not later than the 5th day of the following month. Such reports shall include all shipments during the preceding month and shall show for inshell and shelled walnuts: the quantity shipped; whether they were shipped into domestic or export channels; and for exports, the quantity by country of destination. If a handler makes no shipments during any month, he/she shall submit a report marked “None.” If a handler has completed his/her shipments for the season, he/she shall mark the report “Completed,” and he/she shall not be required to submit any additional CWB Form No. 6 reports during the remainder of that marketing year.
( b ) Reports of walnuts purchased directly from growers by handlers who are manufacturers or retailers shall be submitted to the Board on CWB Form No. 6, not later than the 5th day of the month following the month in which the walnuts were purchased. Such reports shall show the quantity of walnuts purchased.
( c ) Reports of walnuts on which handlers have made purchase commitments with buyers during the month, but which have not yet been shipped, shall be submitted to the Board on CWB Form No. 6, not later than the 5th day of the month following the month in which the walnuts were committed. Such reports shall show the quantity of walnuts committed in either inshell or shelled pounds. If the handler made no commitments during any month, he/she shall mark “None” in the “Purchase Commitments” section of CWB Form No. 6.
[88 FR 56750, Aug. 21, 2023]
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Academic AchievementClassroom TechniquesDiscussion (Teaching Technique)Elementary Secondary EducationLearningQuestioning TechniquesTeaching MethodsWait Time

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of

-- ) ) Target Construction, Inc. ) ) Under Contract No. W912EE-10-C-0028 ) APPEARANCES FORTHE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA Nos. 58812, 58813

S. Leo Arnold, Esq. Matthew W. Willis, Esq.

Ashley, Ashley & Arnold Dyersburg, TN Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq.

Engineer ChiefTrial Attorney John M. Breland, Esq. Walker D. Moller, Esq.

Engineer Trial Attorneys U.S. Army Engineer District, Vicksburg ORDER OF DISMISSAL The parties have filed ajointmotion to dismiss with prejudice stating that the matters in dispute have been resolved. Accordingly, these appeals are dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 8 July 2016

# /t'~C;L 

# J.y\OC,vl 1
MICHAEL
. O'CONNELL Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 58812, 58813, Appeals ofTarget Construction, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:
JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3142 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Mixtures containing 50% of Methyl 

(E)-methoxyimino-2(2-o-tolyloxymethyl) phenyl) acetate (Kresoxim methyl). 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. CHAMBLISS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Mixtures containing 

50% of Methyl (E)-methoxyimino-2(2-o-tolyloxymethyl) 

phenyl) acetate (Kresoxim methyl). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MIXTURES CONTAINING 50% OF METHYL (E)- 

4 METHOXYIMINO-2(2-O-TOLYLOXYMETHYL) 

5 PHENYL) ACETATE (KRESOXIM METHYL). 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 3142 IS 

‘‘ 9902.38.49 Mixtures containing 50% of Methyl (E)- 

methoxyimino-2(2-o-tolyloxymethyl) 

phenyl) acetate (Kresoxim methyl) (CAS 

No. 143390–89–0) (provided for in subheading 3808.20.50). ............................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
PART 700 [RESERVED]

Parent topic: SUBCHAPTER A—GENERAL
Case 2:06-cr-00178-SRW Document 1 Filed 07/14/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cr-00178-SRW Document 1 Filed 07/14/2006 Page 2 of 2
§ 959.23 Term of office. ( a ) The term of office of committee members and their respective alternates shall be for two years and shall begin as of August 1 and end as of July 31. The terms shall be so determined that about one-half of the total committee membership shall terminate each year.
( b ) Committee members and alternates shall serve during the term of office for which they are selected and have qualified, or during that portion thereof beginning on the date on which they qualify during such term of office and continuing until the end thereof, and until their successors are selected and have qualified.
216.403-1 Fixed-price incentive (firm target)

contracts.

(b) Application.

(1) The contracting officer shall give particular consideration to the use of fixed-price incentive (firm

target) contracts, especially for acquisitions moving from development to production.

(2) The contracting officer shall pay particular attention to share lines and ceiling prices for fixedprice incentive (firm target) contracts, with a 120 percent ceiling and a 50/50 share ratio as the

point of departure for establishing the incentive arrangement.

(3) See PGI 216.403-1 for guidance on the use of fixed-price incentive (firm target) contracts.

Parent topic: 216.403 Fixed-price incentive contracts.
211.002 Policy

All defense technology and acquisition programs in DoD are subject to the policies and procedures

in DoDD 5000.01, The Defense Acquisition System, and DoDI 5000.02, Operation of the Adaptive

Acquisition Framework.

Parent topic: Part 211 - DESCRIBING AGENCY NEEDS
# Subpart 5232.2 - COMMERCIAL ITEM PURCHASE FINANCING

**Parent topic:**Part 5232 - CONTRACT FINANCING

## 5232.202 General.

### 5232.202-1 Policy.

 (d) *Unusual contract             financing.*HCAs are not authorized to approve unusual contract financing. In          accordance with DFARS 232.070(a), DPC is the approval authority. Submit requests for          approval via DASN(P) by email at usn.pentagon.asstsecnavrdadc.mbx.pabt@us.navy.mil with the subject          “[Activity Name] DFARS 232.202-1(d) – Unusual Contract Financing.”
#### § 760.31 Assignment.

No assignment shall be made of any indemnity payment due or to come due under the regulations in this subpart. Any assignment or attempted assignment of any indemnity payment due or to come due under this subpart shall be null and void.
#### Carol R. O’Hara, Also Known as Carol Reed, Respondent, v. Gardner Advertising, Inc., et al., Appellants.

Order, entered on June 30, 1967, denying defendants’ motion for summary judgment, unanimously reversed on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements to appellants, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Plaintiff does not have a property right in the phrase “Have A Happy”. “ Disassociated with the subject thereof, whatever it may be, a title or name composed of ordinary words, cannot acquire the status of property. So disassociated, it becomes merely words; and all words of our language are in the public domain. All who speak or write have an inherent right to use any and all words in the English language or any combination thereof for any legitimate purpose.” *(Ball*v. *United Artists Corp.,*13 A D 2d 133, 137.) It is true that plaintiff has sufficiently pleaded a cause of action in unfair competition, in accordance with the requirements set forth in the *Ball*case *(supra).*However, since the defendants have moved for summary judgment and have by affidavits made a prima facie showing of lack of merit to the action, the plaintiff was bound to come forward with proof of evidentiary facts showing a triable issue as to the existence of the material elements of her cause of action. Plaintiff has completely failed to do this. She has not factually demonstrated that the bare words in the phrase used by her have achieved a secondary meaning so that actual confusion resulted, nor is there any showing that defendants’ use of these words was intended to confuse or deceive the public, or that there was a connection between plaintiff’s activities and defendants’ No-Cal beverages and, further, she has not shown any actual injury. Concur •—• Capozzoli, J. P., MeGivern, Markewich, McNally and 'Steuer, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Morales, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered on June 1, 1978, unanimously affirmed. Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. (See *Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur—Birns, J. P., Sandler, Ross, Markewich and Silverman, JJ.
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, William J. Tafuri, President, Chief Financial Officer,
Secretary, Treasurer and Director of Yellowcake Mining Inc. (the Company),
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of the Company, for
      the fiscal year ended July 31, 2007, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                     



|By:    | /s/ William J. Tafuri                                                      
|------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Name:  | WILLIAM J. TAFURI                                                          
|Title: | President, Chief Financial
      Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and Director
|       | (Principal
      Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)        
|Date:  | September  2, 2008                                                         

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the
Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-KSB/A to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-KSB/A), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
#### § 927.150 Reapportionment of the Processed Pear Committee.

Pursuant to § 927.20(c), on or after July 1, 2019, the 10-member Processed Pear Committee is reapportioned and shall consist of three grower members, three handler members, three processor members, and one member representing the public. For each member there shall be an alternate. District 1, the State of Washington, shall be represented by two grower members and two handler members. District 2, the State of Oregon, shall be represented by one grower member and one handler member. Processor members may be from District 1, District 2, or from both districts.

[84 FR 9222, Mar. 14, 2019]
# Subpart 724.2—Freedom of Information Act

**Parent topic:**PART 724—PROTECTION OF PRIVACY AND FREEDOM OF INFORMATION

## 724.202 Policy.

The U.S. Agency for International Development's policies concerning implementation of the Freedom of Information Act are codified in 22 CFR part 212 (USAID Regulation 12).
#### § 920.11 Handle.

*Handle* and ship are synonymous and mean to sell, consign, deliver, or transport kiwifruit, or to cause kiwifruit to be sold, consigned, delivered, or transported, between the production area and any point outside thereof, or within the production area: *Provided,* That the term handle shall not include the sale of kiwifruit on the vine, the transportation within the production area of kiwifruit from the vineyard where grown to a packing facility located within such area for preparation for market, or the delivery of such kiwifruit to such packing facility for such preparation.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Milton Hurst, Respondent, v. Hurst *&*Klar Inc., et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Reynolds, J.

Appeal by the employer and its carrier from a decision and award of benefits to claimant by the Workmen’s Compensation Board. The appellants initially urge that the board’s finding that claimant’s schedule loss of use of his right leg resulted from .an industrial accident which purportedly occurred on September 15, 1962, is not supported by substantial evidence. We cannot agree. We find present only issues of fact and particularly credibility as to whether the alleged incident of September 15 actually occurred and thus the board’s determination must be upheld (e.g., *Matter of Manolakis*v. *Edison S.S. Corp.,*15 A D 2d 845). Similarly, there being present no more than the usual conflict of medical testimony the board’s finding of causal relationship cannot be disturbed. Appellants also contend, however, that even if an award is required the award for 100% loss of the leg was erroneous as a matter of law. They assert that since claimant’s leg was amputated just above the knee and since section 15 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law (subd. 3, par. o) provides that, “ Compensation for an arm or a leg, if amputated at or above the wrist or ankle, shall be for the proportionate loss of .the arm or leg.”, a 100% loss cannot be sustained. Section 15 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law (subd. 3, par. r) provides, however, that, “.Compensation for permanent total loss of use of a member shall be the same as for loss of the member.” and Dr. Schnee, a board examining physician, found a “schedule loss of use of 100% of the right leg” a position directly supported by Dr. Rattner, the board’s assistant medical director. Thus the board’s award for 100% loss must be upheld. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur with Reynolds, J.
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 58 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 58 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 58 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 58 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 58 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 5 of 5
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

B.B., a minor, by and )

through his mother and )

next friend, OWENA KNOWLES, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 3:06cv715-MHT

) 

PAWN CITY, INC., a )

corporation, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDERED

It is ORDERED that the motion to dismiss (Doc. No.

37) is set for submission, without oral argument, on July

6, 2007, with all briefs and evidentiary materials due by

said date.

DONE, this the 15th day of June, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 39 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000760386
<NAME> WELLESLEY III-D FDS 9/30/99

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         360,849
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,463
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               404,312
<PP&E>                                       2,550,722
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,011,523
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 943,511
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          131,201
<BONDS>                                         14,937
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        8,988,039
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (8,190,666)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   943,511
<SALES>                                        628,278
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               677,516
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   47,943
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               541,423
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (938)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,029
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 82,059
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             82,059
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    82,059
<EPS-BASIC>                                     3.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 32 (Thursday, February 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7303-7304]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3060]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Finance Docket No. 35350]


Drake Cement, LLC--Acquisition Exemption--Clarkdale Arizona 
Central Railroad, LLC

    Drake Cement, LLC (DC), a noncarrier, has filed a verified notice 
of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 for DC to acquire from Clarkdale 
Arizona Central Railroad, LLC, approximately 4.12 miles of rail lines, 
located near Drake, Yavapai County, AZ, as follows: (1) A railroad yard 
consisting of six tracks (Tracks A-F) totaling approximately 3.46 miles 
(the Yard); and (2) two tracks (Track G and H) that extend 
approximately 0.66-miles, between Track C in the Yard and

[[Page 7304]]

facilities to be owned and operated by DC.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Drake Switching Company, LLC filed a verified notice of 
exemption to operate these tracks in STB Finance Docket No. 35351, 
Drake Switching Company, LLC --Operation Exemption-- Drake Cement, 
LLC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    DC certifies that the projected annual revenues as a result of the 
proposed transaction will not exceed those that would qualify it as a 
Class III carrier.
    DC states that it expects the transaction to be consummated no 
earlier than 30 days after the filing of the notice. The earliest this 
transaction may be consummated is March 4, 2010, the effective date of 
the exemption (30 days after the exemption was filed).
    If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, 
the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption 
under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a 
petition to revoke will not automatically stay the effectiveness of the 
exemption. Stay petitions must be filed no later than February 25, 2010 
(at least 7 days before the exemption becomes effective).
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 35350, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, 395 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a 
copy of each pleading must be served on Thomas F. McFarland, Thomas F. 
McFarland, P.C., 208 South LaSalle Street, <greek-i>1890, Chicago, IL 
60604-1112.
    Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at http://www.stb.dot.gov.

    Decided: February 12, 2010.

    By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Andrea Pope-Matheson,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2010-3060 Filed 2-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
#### § 966.12 Maturity.

*Maturity* means any of the various degrees of ripeness of tomatoes as established by the committee with approval of the Secretary as determined at the time of the inspection, pursuant to § 966.60(a).

[34 FR 19186, Dec. 4, 1969]
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3349 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on certain fluoropolymers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 26, 2006 

Mr. SHELBY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on certain 

fluoropolymers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF CERTAIN DUTY SUSPENSIONS 

4 ON CERTAIN FLUOROPOLYMERS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.39.04 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 fluoropolymers containing 95 percent or more by weight 

8 of the 3 monomer units tetrafluoroethylene, 

9 hexafluoropropylene, and vinylidene fluoride) is amended 

10 by striking the date in the effective period column and 

11 inserting ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 


dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•S 3349 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 25 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 25 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 25 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 3 of 3