alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Instructions for Public Access to the Spatial Aquatic Model (SAM)

For the Public to access the Spatial Aquatic Model (SAM) which will be presented at the EPA’s Scientific

Advisory Panel (SAP) meeting September 15 to 18, 2015 the public will need to access the tool at the

following website

http://qed.epa.gov/ubertool/sam

This is a secured website. In order to gain access to the tool interested parties should contact Nelson

Thurman ( thurman.nelson@epa.gov ) or Meredith Fry ( Fry.meridith@Epa.gov ) to obtain a User ID and

Password.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED A UNDREA HAIRSTON , A ppellant ,
v. Case No. 5D 23

- 1061 LT Case No. 2022

- CF

- 000698 S TATE O F FLORIDA ,

A ppellee

. ________________________________/ Decision filed J une 30, 2023 A ppeal from t he Circuit Court for St. Johns County , R. Lee Smith, Judge. M atthew J. Metz , Public Defender, and Natali e R. Gossett, Assis tant P ublic Defender, Dayt ona B each, for A ppellant. A s hley Moody, A ttorney General, Tallahassee, and Bonni e Jean Parrish , Assistant Attorney General, Dayt ona Beach, for Appellee. PER CURIA M

. A FFIRMED. LAMBERT , C.J. , SOUD and KILB ANE , JJ., concur.
# L_2014196EN.01004401.xml

| 3.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 196/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 196/44

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 399/2014 of 22 April 2014 concerning the authorisation of the preparations of Lactobacillus brevis DSM 23231, Lactobacillus brevis DSMZ 16680, Lactobacillus plantarum CECT 4528 and Lactobacillus fermentum NCIMB 30169 as feed additives for all animal species

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 119 of 23 April 2014
  )

On pages 42 and 43 in the Annex, in the first column ‘Identification number of the additive’:

for:

‘1k20736’,

read:

‘1k20744’;

for:

‘1k20737’,

read:

‘1k20745’;

for:

‘1k20738’,

read:

‘1k20746’;

for:

‘1k20739’,

read:

‘1k20747’.

---
PART 744—SUBCONTRACTING POLICIES

AND PROCEDURES

Source: 77 FR 8171, Feb. 14, 2012, unless otherwise noted.

Authority: Sec. 621, Pub. L. 87–195, 75 Stat. 445, (22 U.S.C. 2381) as amended; E.O. 12163, Sept.

29, 1979, 44 FR 56673; 3 CFR 1979 Comp., p. 435.

Subpart 744.2—Consent to Subcontracts

744.202-170 Partner vetting.

Parent topic: SUBCHAPTER G—CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

Subpart 744.2—Consent to Subcontracts

744.202-170 Partner vetting.

If an acquisition is identified as subject to partner vetting, see (48 CFR) AIDAR 704.70 for the

applicable procedures and requirements.
Transport Airplane Directorate 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. Renton, W ashington 98057 - 3356

October 17 , 2012 Mr. Doug Lane, Director, Deputy L ead Administrator Regulatory

Administration The Boeing Company PO Box 3707 Seattle, Washington, 98124 Dear Mr. Lane; We received your petition which was posted on the FAA regulations.go v website on September 10 , 2012 and has your stamped date of September 7 , 2012 , for exemption from requirements of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 25.841(a)(2) and (a)(3) at Amendment 87 for the Boeing 787 - 9 airplanes. The exemption, if granted , would provide relief from cabin decompression requirements following an uncontained engine failure so the Model 787 - 9 airplanes would be able to operate where they are most efficient, thereb y reducing fuel burn and producing lower emissions. This reque st, which you submitted to the Department of Transportation’s Federal Docket Management S ys tem (FDMS), has be e n given Docket No. FAA - 2012 - 0972 . We are in the process of reviewing your request, and will contact you if we need additional information. A summ ary of your petition will be published in the Federal Register for public comment, in accordance with the requirements of § 11.85. You will be advised of the agency ’s decision on your petition as soon as possible. I f you have any questions or concerns reg arding your petition or the petition process, please contact Stephen Happenny , ANM - 112 , at 425 - 227 - 2147 , or e - mail, Stephen .Happenn y @faa.gov. Sincerel y,

Michael Menkin Transport Airplane Directorate Aircraft Certification Service
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-74,593]

                    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (“Act”), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on October 6, 2010, applicable to workers of Whirlpool Corporation, including on-site leased workers from Career Solutions TEC Staffing, Fort Smith, Arkansas. The notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on October 25, 2010 (75 FR 65520).                

At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged in the production of refrigerators and trash compactors.

The company reports that workers leased from Andrews International were employed on-site at the Fort Smith, Arkansas location of Whirlpool Corporation. The Department has determined that these workers were sufficiently under the control of Whirlpool Corporation to be considered leased workers.

Based on these findings, the Department is amending this certification to include workers leased from Andrews International working on-site at the Fort Smith, Arkansas location of Whirlpool Corporation.

The amended notice applicable to TA-W-74,593 is hereby issued as follows:

All workers of Whirlpool Corporation, including on-site leased workers from Career Solutions TEC Staffing and Andrews International, Fort Smith, Arkansas, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after October 2, 2010, through October 6, 2012, and all workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation from employment on the date of certification through two years from the date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 6th day of December 2010.

Michael W. Jaffe,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2010-31167 Filed 12-10-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 2502

In re: OSHAY TERRELL JONES
,
Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

. ( 7:13

- cr

- 00038

- MFU

- 1 )

Submitted : February 26, 2019 Decided: February 28, 2019

Before KING, THACKER , and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Oshay Terrell Jones , Petitioner Pro Se

.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Oshay Terrell Jones petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district
court has unduly delayed in ruling on his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion filed in May 201 8

. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present
record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to
proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pres ented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
EXHIBIT 32  INDIE GROWERS ASSOCIATION   Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   In connection with the accompanying annual report on Form 10-K of Indie Growers Association (the Company) for the year ended March 31, 2015 (the Report), I, Robert Coleridge, President and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   July 14, 2015  /s/ Robert ColeridgePresident and Principal Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                            JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                              MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                                              0
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              730,596
<PP&E>                                                     19,510,267
<DEPRECIATION>                                              8,715,755
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             11,733,672
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       2,769,793
<BONDS>                                                    10,703,709
<COMMON>                                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               11,733,672
<SALES>                                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              823,370
<CGS>                                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               1,486,434
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            314,621
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              (663,064)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             3,559,333
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                2,896,269
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                     120.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0

        


</TABLE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Mineralresources of the Sierra Ladrones Wilderness Study Area, Socorro County, NewMexico**** 
SuDocNumber:I19.3:1734-F
ItemNumber: 0620
CGPsystem Number:000594828
 
Report
Plate
 **
#### Leo Leichter, Appellant, v. Francis J. Murphy, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Appeals by plaintiff (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated January 9, 1968, which (a) granted defendant Murphy’s motion to dismiss the complaint as to him for want of prosecution and (b) severed the action as to him and, (2) as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the same court, dated March 25, 1968, as, on reargument, adhered to the original determination. Appeal from order dated January 9, 1968 dismissed as academic. That order was superseded by the order made oh reargument. Order dated March 25, 1968 affirmed insofar as appealed from. Respondent is allowed one bill of $10 costs and disbursements to cover both appeals. Plaintiff’s failure to file and serve a note of issue after a demand and his failure to offer an excuse in affidavits in opposition to the motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute require an affirmance of the dismissal of the complaint. While we have stated that we will apply CPLR 3216 (as amd. by L. 1967, ch. 770, eff. Sept. 1, 1967) to eases appealed to this court after that date, we do not believe that the service requirements of 3216 as amended (certified or registered mail) should be applied where the demand was served prior to the effective date of the amendment. Rabin, Acting P. J., Benjamin, Munder, Martuscello and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
U.S. Deportment of T ransportaHon Federal Aviation Administration



## APR 

## 2 4 

## 2015 Martin Palma z Executive Director , U.S. Hang Gliding & Paragliding Association US HP A P.O. Box 13 30 Colorado Springs , C O 80901
D ear Mr. Palm az, This is in respo n se to your April 23 , 2015 , req ues t for an extens ion of th e comment period for the Not ice of Propo se d Rulemaking (NPRM) en titled "Operation and Certification of Sma ll U nmann ed Aircraft Systems" ( Docket FAA-2015

- 0150

- 2715). Yo u re que sted that th e Federal Aviation Admini stra tion (FAA) extend the comment period so that a ll interested parties may provide thorough and complete ana lysis to the propo se d rul e . The NPRM comme nt period closes April 24 , 20 15. T he FAA believes that it is important to move quickly to add r ess the operation and c e rtification of small unmann e d aircraft systems. The FAA , also , b e li eves that the 60-day comme nt period provided for in the NPRM is a sufficie nt period of tim e for inte rested parti es to file comments on th e proposed rules. Therefore, the FAA does not believ e it is necessary to extend the comment period per yo ur req uest , and yo ur request for an extension of the co mment period is denied. Howeve r, as sta ted in 14 Code of Fe d e ral R egulati ons 

### § 11.4 5, we w ill cons id e r co mm e nt s filed late i f it i s possible to do so without in curring expense or delay. We have placed this re s ponse in the rulemaking docket. S inc e re ly,

# ddDirector, Office of Ru lemaking

1 Additionally, 14 Co d e o f Fe d era l Regul at ion s§ 1 1 .47 requi r es that a r equest for ex t e n sio n of th e comment period be filed at le ast 10 days before the end of the comment period.**~**

f"l lj

I I 

### J IJD 

# (

u C) 'I 

# r 1] 

# t u

# ~ 11"'1:.. a.J



# f[

(l
§ 718.110 Adjustments. ( a ) The farm operator or other interested producer having excess tobacco acreage (other than flue-cured or burley) may adjust an acreage of the crop in order to avoid a marketing quota penalty if such person: ( 1 ) Notifies the county committee of such election within 15 calendar days after the date of mailing of notice of excess acreage by the county committee; and
( 2 ) Pays the cost of a farm inspection to determine the adjusted acreage prior to the date the farm visit is made.
( b ) The farm operator may adjust an acreage of tobacco (except flue-cured and burley) by disposing of such excess tobacco prior to the marketing of any of the same kind of tobacco from the farm. The disposition shall be witnessed by a representative of FSA and may take place before, during, or after the harvesting of the same kind of tobacco grown on the farm. However, no credit will be allowed toward the disposition of excess acreage after the tobacco is harvested but prior to marketing, unless the county committee determines that such tobacco is representative of the entire crop from the farm of the kind of tobacco involved.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

KIMBERLY and LUTHER THURMAN, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) 1:06-CV-00709-DRB

)

TIMBERLINE HOMES, INC., FLEETWOOD )

SPRINGHILL HOMES OF GEORGIA, )

 )

Defendants. )

O R D E R

For good cause, it is 

ORDERED that Plaintiffs show any cause on or before September 15, 2006, why

Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion to Compel Binding Arbitration and Motion

to Stay, filed with exhibits (Doc. 1, August 10, 2006), by Defendant Fleetwood Springhill Homes of

Georgia should not be granted. 

 Done this 15 day of August, 2006. th

/s/ Delores R. Boyd

DELORES R. BOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00709-MHT-DRB Document 10 Filed 08/15/2006 Page 1 of 1
5117.9006 Contracting officer

responsibilities.

(a) At least once a year, the contracting officer must ensure that ordering officer files and

procedures are reviewed and that a representative sampling of orders is selected for tracking from

initiation of the requirement to final payment and close-out of the order.

Parent topic: Subpart 5117.90 - Job Order Contracts
1443.205 Contract clauses.

BPCs may establish procedures, when appropriate, for authorizing the CO to vary the 30-day period

for submission of requests for adjustment prescribed by FAR 43.205.

Parent topic: Subpart 1443.2 - Change Orders
#### § 983.17 Inspector.

*Inspector* means any inspector authorized by the USDA to inspect pistachios.
EX-34 (b)
(logo) PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers Center
300 Madison Avenue
New York NY 10017
Telephone (646) 471 3000
Facsimile (813) 286 6000

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholder of Chase Home Finance LLC:


We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Management's Report on Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing
Criteria, that Chase Home Finance LLC (the "Company") complied with the
servicing criteria set forth in item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange
Commission's Regulation AB, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the
"Reporting Period"), for asset-backed securities transactions backed by prime
residential mortgages serviced on the Real Estate ("RE") servicing system where
the related asset-backed securities were outstanding during the Reporting Period
(the "Platform"), excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(i),
1122(d)(4)(ii) and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not
applicable to the activities performed by it with respect to the Platform.
Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing
criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion
based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining,
on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected
asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of
selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether
the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected
activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures
were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by
the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not
designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred
prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or
amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this
report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's
compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2006 for the asset-backed securities transactions backed by prime
residential mortgages serviced on the real estate ("RE") servicing system where
the related asset-backed securities were outstanding during the Reporting Period
is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

February 26, 2007
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of Cavico Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, June Kim, Chief Financial
Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:





(1) This
report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      June KimJune
      Kim
              Chief
      Financial OfficerDate:  September
      28, 2009