Order: 2014 - 11 - 13 S erved: November 19, 2014

U N I T E D S

T A T E S O F A

M E R I C A D E P A R T M E N T O F T R A N S P O R T A T
I O N 

### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. Issued by t he Department of Transportation on the 19 th 

### day of November , 20 14 Joint application of AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., US AIRWAYS, INC., AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INC., PSA AIRLINES, INC., and PIEDMONT AIRLINES, INC. for approval of a transfer of route authorit y under 49 U.S.C. § 41105 Docket DOT - OST - 20 13 - 0 082

ORDER TRANSFERRING AUTHORI TY AND REISSUING CERTIFICATES Summary By this order, we (1) grant the request of American Airlines, Inc. (“ American Airlines ”), and Envoy Air Inc. (“Envoy”), formerl y known as American Eagle Airlines, Inc. (“American Eagle”) , 1 

### (together, “American”), and US Airways, Inc. (“ Airways ”), PSA Airlines, Inc. (“PSA”), and Piedmont Airlines, Inc. (“Piedmont”) (together, “US Airways”) for approval of a transfer o f route author ity under section 41105 of Title 49 of the United States Code (“the Statute”); (2) transfer the interstate and foreign scheduled certificate s and certain other authorities currently issued to American and US Airways (collectively, the “Joint Applicants”) , subject to the condition that the authority may only be used in a manner consistent with the terms of the air transport agreements between the United States and our aviation partners ; and (3) amend the certificate s and certain other authorities held by bo th American and US Airways to change the name of the holder of such authorities to American and/or US Airways

.

1 On February 7, 2014, American Eagle filed an application in Docket DOT

- OST

- 2014

- 0027 stating that the company intended to change its corporate name to Envoy Air Inc., and requesting that the Department revise its certificates to reflect the new name. Subsequently, b y Order 2014

- 4

- 13, issued April 15, 2014, we revised the interstate and foreign certificates and economic authorities held by American E agle by changing the name of the holder to Envoy Air Inc. In that order, we also registered the trade name “American Eagle” for use in Envoy’s operations.

### 2 Background On February 14, 2013, in accordance with the provisions of section 204.5 of our rules (14 CFR 204.5) requiring air carriers to notify us of substantial changes affecting their operations, AMR Corp. (“ AMR ”) , the parent company of American, together with US Airways Group, Inc. (“USAG”), the parent company of US Airways, advised the Department of an agreement wherein AMR would acquir e all of the outstanding shares of USAG. On April 17, 2013 , the Joint Applicants filed an application in Docket DOT

- OST

- 2013

- 0082 requesting that the Department (1) approve the de facto transfer to American all of the international route authorities hel d by Airways , PSA, and Piedmont , that will result from AMR’s acquisition of the outstanding shares of USAG; (2) reissue the international route authorities issued to Airways , PSA , and Piedmont in the names of the current holders and/or to American Airlines and Envoy ; and (3) reissue the international route authorities issued to American Airlines and Envoy in the names of the current holders and/or Airways , PSA , and Piedmont

. 2 

### The Joint Applicants also request that the Department approve the final transfer of international authority that will occur upon the ultimate merger of American and US Airways. 3 

### Answers to the subject application were due on May 8, 2013. No answers were received. The Joint Applicants American Airlines and Envoy , wholly

- owned subs idiar ies of AMR, are Delaware corporation s headquartered in Fort Worth, Texas. Each air carrier holds certificates of public convenience and necessity authorizing it to engage in interstate and foreign scheduled air transportation of persons, property, an d mail , as well as various certificates, exemptions, and other economic authorities from the Department authorizing the air carrier to engage in foreign air transportation. 4

2 Like Airways and PSA, Piedmont is also a wholly

- owned subsidiary of USAG ; therefore , the air carr ier is identified as one of the Joint Applicants. H owever, Piedmont is a commuter air carrier operating pursuant to 14 CFR Part 298. Part 298 of our regulations exempts air taxi operators and commuter air carriers from the requirements of section 41101 o f the Statute ( i.e., obtaining certificate authority to provide interstate and/or foreign air transportation) . Also, under such authority, Piedmont is permitted to provide foreign air transportation using “small” aircraft (that is, an aircraft having an o riginal design capacity of no more than 60 passenger seats or 18,000 pound payload). Thus, Piedmont holds no certificate authority from the Department that would require transfer. 3 The Joint Applicants also filed an application (Docket DOT

- OST

- 2013

- 0081) for an exemption from section 41105 to the extent necessary to allow the acquisition of Airways, PSA, and Piedmont by the parent of American to be completed prior to our action on the de facto transfer request. By Order 2013

- 11

- 8, issued November 14, 201 3, the Department granted the exemption on the condition that American Airlines, Envoy (f/k/a American Eagle ) , Airways, PSA, and Piedmont remain separate entities until our decision on the de facto transfer request ha s been made. 4 The Department reissu ed American Airlines’ interstate scheduled certificate authority by Order 98

- 7

- 6, issued July 8, 1998. The Department reissued Envoy ’ s interstate scheduled certificate authority and small aircraft designations by Order 201 4

- 4

- 13, issued April 15, 2014. See Attachment E for a complete list of American Airlines’ and Envoy’s foreign authorities.

### 3
Airways and PSA are wholly

- owned subsidiar ies of USAG. Airways, a Delaware co rporation headquartered in Tempe, Arizona , holds certificates of public convenience and necessity authorizing it to engage in interstate and foreign scheduled air transportation of persons, property, and mail, as well as various certificates, exemptions, a nd other economic authorities from the Department authorizing the air carrier to engage in foreign air transportation

. 5 

### PSA , a Pennsylvania corporation with its principal office in Vandalia, Ohio , holds certificate s of public convenience and necessity to engage in interstate and foreign air transportation of persons, property, and mail

. 6 

### Statutory Standard A certificate may be transferred under section 41105 of the Statute if the Department determines that the transfer is in the public interest. The p rimary criteria in determining the “public interest” are whether the certificate transfer would conflict with important international aviation policy objectives, whether the surviving entities are U.S. citizens, and whether they will be fit to hold the aut hority. Further, section 41105(b) requires the Department to analyze the impact of the transaction on the viability of the air carrier applicants, competition in the domestic airline industry, and the trade position of the United States in the internation al air transportation market. 7 

### Also, t he Department has previously determined that when two or more air carriers each holding international route authority come under common ownership and control, a de facto transfer of authority has taken place under sec tion 41105 of the Statute. 8 

### Transfer of Authority In support of their request for a transfer, the Joint Applicants state that AMR will acquire all of the outstanding shares of USAG, and USAG would then become a wholly

- owned subsidiary of AMR. U pon co nsummation of the acquisition of USAG by AMR, AMR would change its name to American Airlines Group, Inc. (“AAG.”)

. The Joint Applicants state that following a transition period, US Airways will be fully integrated into American with American continuing as the surviving corporation (“New American”). American and US Airways intend to integrate their operations, employees, and route networks into a single entity using the brand name American, and the Joint Applicants request that the Department transfer th e certificates and international route authority currently held by US Airways to American to facilitate their merger into a single entity, and allow route integration to enable US Airways and American to integrate their services on the transferred routes w ith existing services on other international routes

5 The Department reissued Airways’ interstate scheduled ce rtificate authority by Order 98

- 7

- 6, issued July 8, 1998. See Attachment E for a complete list of Airways’ foreign authorities. 6 See Order 2004

- 3

- 32, issued March 29, 2004. Also see Attachment E for a complete list of PSA’s foreign authorities. 7 See O rder 2000

- 9

- 4 at 2. 8 See Order 2001

- 12

- 15 and Order 2009

- 9

- 4.

### 4 so long as they use the rights in a manner consistent with the terms of any applicable air transport agreement. The Joint Applicants claim that the proposed merger is in the public interest because i t will generate important and substantial public benefits for U.S. passengers, shippers, communities, and airline workers. The Joint Applicants argue that New American will offer greatly expanded domestic and international options for travelers, compe ting globally with U.S. and foreign carriers and advancing compe tition among global alliances. The Joint Applicants also contend that combining the American and US Airways’ fleet of aircraft will enable New American to better match seat capacity with passenger demand and flight length, leading to greater public benefits. T he Joint Applicants claim that such fleet optimization will offer travelers a greater number of frequencies, flexible scheduling, and more destinations. They maintain that the combin ed network will enhance access to 192 destinations around the world that were previously served by one of the Joint Applicants, but not both. With respect to U.S. international aviation policy , the Joint Applicants state that American and US Airways have no nonstop overlapping international routes; the refore, the proposed merger would not result in any reduction of competition on nonstop routes. Additionally, they argue that their existing routes bring together a complimentary network that will provide c onsumers and communities with more nonstop flights to more destinations. They state that New American will serve more than 30 cities in Central and South America. In the Trans

- Atlantic market, the Joint Applicants state that the merger will give them a b roader presence, offering service to 21 destinations in Europe and the Middle East to over 52 city

- pair routes. Further, the Joint Applicants contend that the merger will facilitate growth in the Trans

- Pacific market, including service to Beijing, Shangha i, Tokyo, and Seoul. The Joint Applicants attest that following the merger, the air carriers will continue to remain fit and continue to be U.S. citizens. Further, t he Joint Applicants assert that the merger will have a positive impact on their viabili ty. They expect the merger to enable them to achieve approximately $1 billion in net annual cost and network synergies. 9 

### These synergies, according to the Joint Applicants, will create a more financially secure company with additional resources to weathe r increases in fuel prices and uncertain economic conditions. The Joint Applicants state that one of the largest synergies will be from the elimination of gaps in American’s and US Airways’ current international route networks. Also, the combined air car rier will be able to expand its international service and reinvest in new products and services. Thus, the Joint Applicants assert that these synergies will enable the new merged airline to compete vigorously and efficiently in the intensely competitive g lobal air transportation arena. To the extent that the route transfers have any impact on domestic competition, the Joint Applicants maintain that the merger will enhance domestic competition. According to the Joint Applicants, New American will have 24.5 percent of domestic available seat miles and will compete against the nationwide networks of other U.S. air carriers. The

9 The Joint Applicants state that they expect total synergies of more than $1.4 billion, but they have agreed to share $400 million with employees through increased compensation.

### 5 Joint Applicants state the New American plans to retain all American’s and US Airways’ hubs and offer service on 682 domestic r outes to 218 destinations. The Joint Applicants note that across this vast array of routes, American and US Airways overlap on only 12 nonstop domestic routes. 10 

### With respect to the merger’s impact on the trade position of the United States in the interna tional air transportation market, the Joint Applicants argue that the proposed merger will have a positive effect , claiming that the country’s trade position will be enhanced by the creation of New American. The Joint Applicants state that New America n will have a route network serving over 325 worldwide destinations, including key capital cities, business centers, and tourist destinations in Europe, the Middle East, Central and South America, Mexico, Canada, the Caribbean, and Asia. Moreover, the Joi nt Applicants contend that New American will be able to develop international routes and gateways on a scale that the Joint Applicants could not achieve independently, providing new travel options for U.S. and foreign travelers. Thus, the Joint Applic ants contend that New American’s enhanced ability to compete will positively impact the trade position of the United States. Lastly, the Joint Applicants state that they are committed to fair and equitable integration of the labor forces, and contend that the proposed merger will benefit American’s and US Airways’ employees. They state that the Allied Pilots Association, Association of Professional Flight Attendants, Transportation Workers Union, and US Airline Pilots Association have agreed to new terms that take effect upon closing of the merger. The Joint Applicants argue that through job security, greater career opportunities, better compensation, and better representation, employees will benefit from the proposed merger. We have considered the argum ents presented by the Joint Applicants and have decided to grant the transfer of authority

. We find that the proposed certificate transfer is in the public interest. T he transfer will not negatively affect the trade position of the United States in the i nternational air transportation market. American and US Airways have no nonstop overlapping international routes , and therefore, the proposed merger would not result in any reduction of competition on nonstop routes. Also, New American will be part o f the oneworld Alliance which will enable the air carrier to provide even greater international transportation options for travelers. Overall, w e find that the proposed merger would not conflict with international aviation policy objectives and would in f act support such objectives by enhancing international air transportation competition. In addition, we f ind that the proposed merger will enhance the viability of the Joint Applicants. The merger is expected to produce approximately $1.0 billion in annua l synergies, which will allow the combined air carrier the ability to more readily face future financial challenges

.

10 The ove rlapping routes are: CLT

- DFW/LGA/MIA/ORD; DCA

- BNA/RDU; PHL

- DFW/MIA/ORD; and PHX

- DFW/LAX/ORD.

### 6 Moreover, we find that the integration of American’s and US Airways’ current operations will not only increase the options available to the traveling public, but the Joint Applicants’ agreement to divest slots, gates, and ground facilities at key constrained airports across the United States , 11 

### will level the playing field for other U.S. air carriers to compete more effectively in the U.S. domestic aviation market. O ur review of the Joint Applicants’ pleadings and other data available to the Department raises no issues that would lead us to question the fitness or citizenship of Airways, PSA, or Piedmont, as a result of this transaction. 12 

### In consideration of the foregoing, we find that a de facto transfer of certificate and other international route authorities held by Airways and PSA to Airways and PSA under the ownership of AAG is in the public interest. We also find that the transfe r of certificates and international authorities to allow for the merger into New American is in the public interest. We note, however, that since Piedmont holds a commuter air carrier authorization under 14 CFR Part 298, that air carrier does not hold any certificates or international route authorities which would require a transfer. To facilitate the operational integration of American and US Airways , the Department will amend and reissue the international route authorities issued to American Airli nes in the name of the current holder and/or Airways

. Likewise, we will amend and reissue the international route authorities issued to Airways in the name of the current holder and / or American Airlines. We will also amend Envoy’s authority and PSA’s aut hority to permit each air carrier to operate each other’s routes. We note, however, that only one air carrier, either American or US Airways , but not both of them, may operate or be designated to operate over a route or route segment where the terms of a n air transport agreement limit U.S. air carrier entry on that route or route segment to one air carrier or the other. Route Integration The terms of the blanket route integration certificate authority held by American Airlines allow s the air carrier to integrate the authority it holds, or that it may be granted, by certificate or exemption, under 49 U.S.C. §§ 44109 and 41102. Upon reissuance of the economic authority of American Airlines , including its blanket route integration certificate , as describe d above, American and US Airways will be able to fully integrate the certificate and exemption authority each currently holds. We find that such integration is in the public interest as it will provide the air carriers with maximum operating flexibility a nd will facilitate the ability of the air carriers to implement the transferred authorities. We note that all operations conducted under route integration authority are subject to the condition that all such integrated operations are in compliance with th e provisions of all applicable aviation agreements, and provided further, that

11 See United States et. a l. v. US Airways Group, Inc. and AMR Corporation; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement (78 FR71396). 12 The Departm ent recently concluded continuing fitness reviews of the Joint Applicants and found that each remained fit to conduct operations as U.S. certificated air carriers.

### 7 nothing in this order should be construed as conferring upon the air carriers additional rights (including fifth

- freedom intermediate and/or beyond rights) to serve markets wher e U.S. air carrier entry is limited unless the air carriers first notify the Department of the intent to serve such a market and unless and until the Department has completed any necessary air carrier selection procedures to determine which air carrier(s) should be authorized to exercise such rights. Also, should there be a request by any air carrier to use the limited

- entry route rights by virtue of the route integration authority discussed here, but which are not being used, the holding of such authority by route integration will not be construed as providing any preference for any of the air carriers in a competitive air carrier selection proceeding to determine which air carrier(s) should be entitled to use the authority at issue. ACCORDINGLY: 1) We gr ant the request of American Airlines, Inc., Envoy Air Inc. , US Airways, Inc., PSA Airlines, Inc. , and Piedmont Airlines, Inc ., for approval under 49 U.S.C. § 41105 of the de facto transfer of the certificates and other economic authorities held by US Airwa ys, Inc., and PSA Airlines, Inc., to US Airways, Inc., and PSA Airlines, Inc., under the ownership of American Airlines Group, Inc. 2) We transfer to American Airlines, Inc., and/or US Airways, Inc. , the interstate and foreign air transportation certificates currently held by American Airlines , Inc., and amend them, in the form attached (Attachment A ), by changing the name of the holder from “ American Airlines , Inc.” to “American Airlines, Inc., and/or US Airways, Inc. ” We transfer the exemption authority and frequency allocations listed in Attachment E from American Airlines , Inc., to American Airlines, Inc., and/or US Airways, Inc. 3) We transfer to American Airlines, Inc., Envoy Air Inc., US Airways, Inc., and/or PSA Airlines, Inc., the interstate and foreig n air transportation certificates currently held by Envoy Air Inc., and amend them, in the form attached (Attachment B ), by changing the name of the holder from “ Envoy Air Inc .” to “ American Airlines, Inc., Envoy Air Inc., US Airways, Inc., and/or PSA Airl ines, ” We transfer the exemption authority and frequency allocations listed in Attachment E from Envoy Air Inc ., to American Airlines, Inc., Envoy Air Inc., US Airways, Inc., and/or PSA Airlines

. 4) We transfer to American Airlines, Inc., and/or US Airways, Inc. , the interstate and foreign air transportation certificates currently held by US Airways, Inc., and amend them, in the form attached (Attachment C ) , by changing the name of the holder from

“ US Airways, Inc. ” to “ American Airlines, Inc., and/or US Air ways, Inc .” We transfer the exemption authority and frequency allocations listed in Attachment E from US Airways, Inc

. , to American Airlines, Inc., and/or US Airways, Inc

. 5) We transfer to American Airlines, Inc., Envoy Air Inc., US Airways, Inc., and/or P SA Airlines, Inc., the interstate and foreign air transportation certificates and authorities currently held by PSA Airlines, Inc. , and amend them, in the form attached

### 8 (Attachment D ), by changing the name of the holder from “PSA Airlines , Inc. ” to

“ Americ an Airlines, Inc., Envoy Air Inc. , US Airways, Inc., and/or PSA Airlines, Inc .” We transfer the certificate authority, exemption authority, frequenc y allocations, and other authorities listed in Attachment E , from PSA Airlines, Inc., to American Airlines, Inc., Envoy Air Inc., US Airways, Inc., and/or PSA Airlines, Inc

. 6) The authority granted may only be used in a manner consistent with the terms of the air transport agreement s between the United States and our aviation partners. 7) Unless disapproved by t he President of the United States under section 41307 of the Statute, this order shall become effective on the 61st day after its submission for section 41307 review or upon the date of receipt of advice from the President or his designee under Executive O rder 12597 and implementing regulations that he or she does not intend to disapprove the Department’s order under that section, whichever occurs earlier. 13 

### 8 ) We will serve a copy of this order on all parties listed in Attachment F

. By:

SUSAN L. KURLAND Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at http://www.regulations.gov

13 This order was submitted for secti on 41307 review on September 16, 2014. On November 17, 2014 , we received notification that the President ’ s designee under Executive Order 12597 and implementing regulations did not intend to disapprove the Department ’ s order.Attachment A 

### *As amended by Order 2014

- 11

- 13

Page 1 of 1

American Airlines, Inc., for Routes 137, 147, 389, 542, 543, 602, 628, 794, 826, 835 , 903 , and blanket route integration

Amend the holder of the certificate(s) to read as follows:
American Airlines, Inc. and/or US Airways , Inc. 1


### Where certificates involve air transportation service in limited

- entry markets, the following condition will be added:
( ) The authority granted may only be used in a manner consistent with the terms of the air transport agreement s between the Unite d States and our aviation partners.

This certificate amendment shall become effective November 19, 2014

.

.

1 The subject certificates are bei ng amended to reflect the Department’s approval, under 49 U.S.C. § 41105, of the de facto transfer of the economic authorities held by American Airlines to Airways. To facilitate a smooth transition of the integrated services and to provide for maximum op erational flexibility during this time, the certificates will read, “American Airlines, Inc., and/or US Airways, Inc.” Additional condition(s) may apply to certain of these certificates, as indicated.Attachment B 

### *As amended by Order 2014

- 11

- 13

Page 1 of 1

Envoy Air Inc., for Routes 537, 905, and 906

Amend the holder of the certificate(s) to read as follows: American Airlines, Inc., Envoy Air Inc., US Airways, Inc., and/or PSA Airlines, Inc. 1


### Where certificates involve air transportation service in limited

- entry markets, the following conditi on will be added:
( ) The authority granted may only be used in a manner consistent with the terms of the air transport agreements between the United States and our aviation partners.

This certificate amendment shall become effective November 19, 2014

.

.

1 The subject certificates are being amended to refle ct the Department’s approval, under 49 U.S.C. § 41105, of the de facto transfer of the economic authorities held by Envoy to American Airlines and PSA. To facilitate a smooth transition of the integrated services and to provide for maximum operational fle xibility during this time, the certificates will read, “ American Airlines, Inc., Envoy Air Inc., US Airways, Inc., and/or PSA Airlines, Inc. ” Additional condition(s) may apply to certain of these certificates, as indicated.Attachment C 

### *As amended by Order 2014

- 11

- 13

Page 1 of 1

US Airways, Inc. , for Routes 839, 87 - F, 97 - F , 1 

### and blanket route integration

Amend the holder of the certificate(s) to read as follows:
American Airlines, Inc. and/or US Airways , Inc. 2


### Where certificates involve air transportation service in limited

- entry markets, the following condition will be added:
( ) The authority granted may only be used in a manner consistent with the terms of the air transport agreements between the United States and our aviation partners.

This certificate amendment shall become effective November 19, 2014

.

1 Although only US Airways’ non - Open Skies r oute s that are not superseded by Order 2007

- 4

- 20 are listed, US Airways requests the transfer of all of the routes contained within the Order. 2 The subject certificates are being amended to reflect the Department’s approval, under 49 U.S.C. § 41105, of the d e facto transfer of the economic authorities held by American Airlines to Airways. To facilitate a smooth transition of the integrated services and to provide for maximum operational flexibility during this time, the certificates will read, “American Airl ines, Inc., and/or US Airways, Inc.” Additional condition(s) may apply to certain of these certificates, as indicated.Attachment D 

### *As amended by Order 2014

- 11

- 13

Page 1 of 1

PSA Airlines, Inc. , for Route 819

Amend the holder of the certificate(s) to read as follows:
American Airlines, Inc., Envoy Air Inc., US Airways , Inc. , and/or PSA Airlines, Inc. 1


### Where certificates involve air transportation service in limited

- entry markets, the following condition will be added:
( ) The authority granted may only be used in a manner consistent with the terms of the air transport agreements between the United States and our aviation partners.

This certificate amendment shall become effective November 19, 2014

.

1 The subject certificates are being amended to reflect the Department’s approval, under 49 U.S.C. § 41105, of the de facto transfer of the economic authorities held by American Airlines to Airways. To facilitate a smooth transition of the integrated services and to provide for maximum operational flexibility during this time, the certificates will read, “American Airlines, Inc., Envoy Air Inc., US Airways, Inc. , and/or PSA Airlines, Inc. ” Additional condition(s) may apply to certain of these certificates, as indicated.Attachment E JOINT APPLICANTS’ INTERNATIONAL ROUTE AUTHORITIES I. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. A. Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity Route # Route Description Order(s) 835 Open Skies Route Author ity Order 2007
- 4
- 2 None Blanket R oute I ntegration Order 2010
- 12
- 24 137 U.S.
- Haiti, Dominican Republic, St. Maarten, St. Kitts and Nevis, St. Lucia, Antigua and Barbuda, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Barbados, Grenada, Trinidad and Tobago, Aruba, Curacao, Angu illa, Carriacou, Dominica, Montserrat, Mustique, Saba, St. Barthelemy, St. Eustatius, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, the British Virgin Islands, the Cayman Islands, the Turks and Caicos Islands, and Union Island. U.S.
- Bahama Islands Atlanta, Baltimore, Bo ston, Chicago, Detroit, Miami, New York/Newark, Philadelphia, Washington DC, Raleigh/ Durham
- Bermuda U.S.
- Hong Kong and Singapore Note: Routes granted by Open Skies Order 2007
- 4
- 2 not listed Order 1996
- 5
- 9

147 New York, Philadelphia
- Bermuda New York, Philadelphia, St. Louis
- Algeria, Libya, Tunisia, Egypt, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Mandalay, Hong Kong, and Hanoi (acquired from TWA) (Timely renewal filed

– pending) Note: Routes granted by Open Skies Order 2007
- 4
- 2 not listed Order 2001
- 4
- 7

389 Betwe en the terminal points Boston, Dallas/Ft. Worth, Houston, Miami, New Orleans, New York/Newark, Washington DC (to be served through Dulles International Airport), the intermediate points Panama City, Panama; Barranquilla, Bogota, and Cali, Colombia; Quito a nd Guayaquil, Ecuador; Lima, Peru; Montevideo, Uruguay; and La Paz, Bolivia, and (a) beyond La Paz the intermediate point Asuncion, Paraguay and the terminal point Buenos Aires, Argentina; and (b) beyond La Paz, the intermediate point Santiago, Chile and t he terminal point Buenos Aires, Argentina Between the coterminal points Los Angeles and San Francisco, the intermediate points Bogota and Cali, Colombia, Quito and Guayaquil, Ecuador, Lima, Peru, Order 1990
- 5
- 5, and Order 92
- 6
- 21

### 2 La Paz, Bolivia, and beyond La Paz, as described in (a) and (b) above (Timely renewal filed

– pending) Note: Routes granted by Open Skies Order 2007
- 4
- 2 not listed 542 Puerto Rico
- Caracas (Timely renewal filed

– pending) Order 1988
- 5
- 42 543 Miami/New York/Newark
- Caracas/Maracai bo Venezuela (Timely renewal filed

– pending) Order 1990
- 5
- 5

602 Europe/Middle East/Asia (Timely renewal filed

– pending) Order 1996
- 5
- 9, 628 Dallas/Ft. Worth
- Acapulco Dallas/Ft. Worth
- Mexico City Dallas/Ft. Worth
- Monterrey Chicago
- Mexico City Order 1 992
- 5
- 20

794 New York
- Cancun (Timely renewal filed

– pending) Order 2001
- 4
- 7 826 Chicago
- Shanghai (Timely renewal filed

– pending) Order 2005
- 3
- 40, 826 Chicago
- Beijing (segment 2) (Timely renewal filed

– pending) Order 2007
- 12
- 26 903 Chicago
- Acapul co, Cancun, Cozumel, Puerto Vallarta, San Jose del Cabo; Dallas/Ft. Worth
- Cancun; Cozumel, Guadalajara, Ixtapa/Zihuatanejo, Leon, Puerto Vallarta, San Jose del Cabo; Los Angeles
- San Jose del Cabo; Miami
- Cancun, Mexico City/Toluca Order 2011
- 6
- 11

B. Exempti on Authorities Route Description Order/NOAT Docket Miami
- Valencia, Venezuela NOAT February 4, 2013 DOT
- OST
- 2006
- 26387 U.S.
- Brazil NOAT July 22, 2013 DOT
- OST
- 2013
- 0137 Miami
- Santa Cruz/La Paz, Bolivia NOAT July 31, 2013 DOT
- OST
- 1997
- 2302 Dallas/Ft . Worth
- Caracas, Venezuela NOAT July 13, 2012 DOT
- OST
- 1997
- 2527 Los Angeles
- Shanghai NOAT July 31, 2012 DOT
- OST
- 2010
- 0245 U.S.
- South Africa for codesharing on British Airways NOAT January 28, 1998 (timely renewal filed) DOT
- OST
- 1998
- 3401 U.S.
- Vietnam for codesharing on Japan Airlines NOAT February 4, 2013 DOT
- OST
- 2002
- 12496 U.S.
- Hong Kong for codesharing on Cathay Pacific NOAT February 4, 2013 DOT
- OST
- 2000
- 6824 U.S. to 4 points in Argentina, to 5 additional points in Argentina on a code
share basis only, and to 5 additional NOAT February 4, 2013 DOT
- OST
- 2007
- 0034

### 3 points in Argentina on a codeshare basis only in conjunction with a designated airline of Argentina U.S.
- Fiji, Kirabati (Christmas Island), Vanuatu, Solomon Islands for codesharing on Air Pacific NOAT August 1, 2013 DOT
- OST
- 2011
- 0197 Between points within Ecuador for code
- sharing on LAN Ecuador NOAT August 20, 2013 DOT
- OST
- 2011
- 0210 Seattle
- Beijing and to points within China on a codeshare
- basis only for codesharing on Hainan Airlines NO AT August 1, 2013 DOT
- OST
- 2011
- 0228
U.S. to Cordoba, Bariloche, Mendoza, and Rosario, Argentina on a codeshare basis only for codesharing on LAN via Santiago, Chile NOAT August 1, 2013 DOT
- OST
- 2006
- 24194

Blanket exemption authority for codesharing NOAT F ebruary 28, 2013 DOT
- OST
- 2009
- 0337 U,S.
- Mexico transborder routes for code
- sharing on Alaska Airlines (Los Angeles
- Guadalajara, La Paz, Loreto, Manzanillo, Mazatlan, Mexico City, Puerto Vallarta, Zihuatanejo; Sacramento
- Guadalajara; San Diego
Puerto Valla rta; San Francisco
- Puerto Vallarta; San Jose
- Guadalajara) NOAT July 19, 2012 DOT
- OST
- 2010
- 0222

Miami

– Cozumel NOAT August 16, 2013 DOT
- OST
- 2013
- 0154 DFW
- Shanghai NOAT October 30, 2013 DOT
- OST
- 2013
- 0187 U.S.
- Brazil for codesharing on TAM NOAT January 25, 2013 DOT
- OST
- 2012
- 0209

C. Frequency Allocations
Number of Frequencies Route Description Order/NOAT 9 Argentina

– Acquired from Eastern in 1990 Order 1990
- 5
- 5 5 Argentina Order 1995
- 2
- 23 7 Argentina

– Above 14 increased to 21 when the 1 to 1.5 n arrowbody/ widebody formula was abolished 3 Argentina Order 2003
- 8
- 14 4 Dallas/Ft. Worth
- Buenos Aires DOT
- OST
- 2003
- 15384, January 2, 2004 4 Miami
- Buenos Aires DOT
- OST
- 2010
- 0178, July 12, 2010 (seasonal) 7 Brazil
- Acquired from Eastern in 1990 Order 1 990
- 5
- 5 3 Brazil automatic increase effective 4/1/91 Order 1991
- 2
- 15 4 Brazil Order 1991
- 2
- 15

### 4
6 New York (JFK)
- Sao Paulo, Brazil Order 1991
- 6
- 5 1 New York (JFK)
- Sao Paulo, Brazil Order 1991
- 8
- 25 7 Miami
- Sao Paulo, Brazil DOT
- OST
- 1996
- 1356, June 1, 19 98 3 Dallas/Ft. Worth
- Sao Paulo, Brazil Order 1995
- 1
- 27 11 U.S.
- Brazil Order 1995
- 10
- 25 2 Miami
- Sao Paulo, Brazil DOT
- OST
- 2003
- 15965, August 14, 2003 3 Miami
- Sao Paulo, Brazil DOT
- OST
- 2004
- 17139, February 24, 2004 10 U.S.
- Brazil DOT
- OST
- 2008
- 0229, Aug ust 8, 2008 1 Miami
- Belo Horizonte Order 2008
- 11
- 21 3 Dallas/Ft. Worth
- Rio de Janeiro, Brazil DOT
- OST
- 2010
- 0179, August 6, 2010 7 New York (JFK)
- Rio de Janeiro, Brazil DOT
- OST
- 2010
- 0088, June 16, 2010 4 Miami
- Brasilia, Brazil DOT
- OST
- 2010
- 0088, Ju ne 16, 2010 10 Miami
- Brasilia Miami
- Belo Horizonte Miami
- Manaus DOT
- OST
- 2011
- 0086, May 13, 2011 3 Miami
- Manaus, Brazil DOT
- OST
- 2011
- 0086, February 8, 2012 14 Miami
- Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (7 to backfill Miami
- Rio de Janeiro that AA transferred to Miami
- Sao Paulo and 7 for Miami
- Rio de Janeiro #2) DOT
- OST
- 2012
- 0079 May 24, 2012

3 7 7 Miami
- Recife Miami
- Salvador Los Angeles
- Sao Paulo Miami
- Porto Alegre
- Curitiba
- Miami DOT
- OST
- 2012
- 0079 May 24, 2012 Order 2013
- 7
- 4 DOT
- OST
- 2013
- 0137 July 22, 2013 7 Chicago
- Shanghai, China (timely renewal filed) Order 2005
- 3
- 40 7 Chicago
- Beijing, China Order 2007
- 12
- 26 7 Los Angeles
- Shanghai, China DOT
- OST
- 2010
- 0245 July 31, 2012 7 DFW
- Shanghai, China DOT
- OST
- 2013
- 0187 October 30, 2013 19.5 Ecuador Order 1992
- 10
- 43 1.5 Ecuador DOT
- OST
- 2002
- 12000, July 12, 2002 3 Ecuador DOT
- OST
- 2009
- 0220, October 8, 2009 4 Ecuador DOT
- OST
- 2009
- 0220, January 30, 2013 7 Dallas/Ft. Worth
- Tokyo, Japan (NRT) Order 1986
- 10
- 16

### 5

7 New York (JFK)
- Tokyo, Japan (NRT) Order 1998
- 5
- 17 7 Chicago
- Tokyo, Japan (NRT) Order 1998
- 5
- 17 4 Dallas/Ft. Worth
- Tokyo, Japan (NRT) DOT
- OST
- 2002
- 11266, March 20, 2002 7 Los Angeles
- Tokyo, Japan (NRT) DOT
- OST
- 2002
- 12554, July 17, 2002 1 Dallas/Ft. Worth
- Tokyo, Japan (NRT) DOT
- OST
- 1998
- 3419, Septembe r 13, 2002 (initially 3 but 2 lapsed as dormant; see AA application on September 21, 2004) 1 Dallas/Ft. Worth
- Tokyo, Japan (NRT) DOT
- OST
- 1998
- 3419, September 27, 2004 1 Dallas/Ft. Worth
- Tokyo, Japan (NRT) DOT
- OST
- 1998
- 3419, January 20, 2005 7 New York (JFK)
- Tokyo, Japan (HND) Order 2010
- 7
- 2 Cease operations Dec 2, 2013

D. Codesharing Statements of Authorization Airline Partner Homeland Order/NOAT/ Department Action Docket Gulf Air Bahrain NOAT, August 4, 2008 DOT
- OST
- 2008
- 0195 Qantas Australia Dep artment Action, May 23, 2008 DOT
- OST
- 2008
- 0138 Iberia Spain Department Action, February 13, 2008 DOT
- OST
- 2008
- 0044 Finnair Finland Department Action, January 7, 2000 *** DOT
- OST
- 1999
- 6544 Japan Airlines Japan Department Action, February 18, 2010
*** DOT
- OST
- 1999
- 4994 Lan Chile Department Action, January 7, 2000 *** DOT
- OST
- 1999
- 6546 Cathay Pacific Hong Kong NOAT January 8, 2002 DOT
- OST
- 2000
- 6824 British Airways United Kingdom Orders 2003
- 5
- 33 and 2010
- 7
- 8 DOT
- OST
- 2002
- 13861 Lan Peru Peru NOAT Febru ary 16, 2007 DOT
- OST
- 2004
- 19965 Royal Jordanian Jordan NOAT DOT
- OST
- 2006
-

### 6
March 23, 2007 26716 Jet Airways (India) India Department Action, January 7, 2008 DOT
- OST
- 2007
- 0078 El Al Israel NOAT March 28, 2008 DOT
- OST
- 2007
- 0095 Lan Argentina Argentina NOA T June 11, 2009 DOT
- OST
- 2007
- 0034 Etihad U.A.E Department Action, July 24, 2009 DOT
- OST
- 2009
- 0154 Air Berlin Germany NOAT October 1, 2010 DOT
- OST
- 2010
- 0192 Kingfisher India Department Action, March 8, 2011 DOT
- OST
- 2010
- 0288 WestJet Canada Department A ction, March 10, 2011 DOT
- OST
- 2011
- 0040 Air Pacific Fiji NOAT November 30, 2011 DOT
- OST
- 2011
- 0197 Lan Ecuador Ecuador NOAT December 13, 2011 DOT
- OST
- 2011
- 0210 Hainan Airlines China NOAT February 15, 2012 DOT
- OST
- 2011
- 0228 Air Tahiti French Polynesia NOAT July 5, 2012 DOT
- OST
- 2012
- 0092 TAM Brazil NOAT January 5, 2013 DOT
- OST
- 2012
- 0209
LAN Colombia Colombia NOAT January 25, 2013 DOT
- OST
- 2012
- 0208 Qatar Airways Qatar NOAT February 20, 2013 DOT
- OST
- 2013
- 0007 Malaysia Airlines Malaysia NOAT Fe bruary 28, 2013 DOT
- OST
- 2013
- 0022

*** The initial statements of authorization issued to American for codesharing with JAL, Lan, and Finnair did not include American Eagle. American Eagle was added by Department Action, November 8, 2001 in DOT
- OST
- 99
- 49 94, DOT
- OST
- 99
- 6546, and DOT
- OST
- 99
- 6544.

E. Third - Country Codeshare Designations Airline Partner Country Order/NOAT/ Department Action Docket British Airways Flights to/from South Africa NOAT September 29, 2003 DOT
- OST
- 2002
- 12193

### 7

II. ENVOY AIR , INC. A. C ertificates of Public Convenience and Necessity Route # Route Description Order(s) 537 U.S.
- Haiti, Dominican Republic, Netherland Antilles, St. Maarten, St. Kitts and Nevis, St. Lucia, Antigua and Barbuda, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Barbados, Grenada, Trini dad and Tobago, Aruba, Curacao, Anguilla, Carriacou, Dominica, Montserrat, Mustique, Saba, St. Barthelemy, St. Eustatius, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, the British Virgin Islands, the Cayman Islands, the Turks and Caicos Islands, Union Island, and the Ba hamas Order 1998
- 5
- 12

905 Open Skies Route Authority Order 2011
- 8
- 9 906 Dallas/Ft. Worth
- Chihuahua, Guadalajara, Monterrey, San Luis Potosi, and Torreon, Mexico Order 2011
- 11
- 19

B. Small Aircraft Codeshare Designation Notifications DOT - OST - 2011 - 0 076 DFW
- Aguascalientes DFW
- Hermosillo DFW
- Leon DFW
- Mazatlan DFW
- Morelia DFW
- Puebla DFW
- Queretaro DFW
- Veracruz DFW
- Zacatecas

III. US AIRWAYS, INC. 1 A. Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity Route # Route Description Order(s) 839 Open Skies Route Au thority Order 2007
- 4
- 20 2

1 For those authorities marked with a “*” , US Airways also applied for Statements of Authorization on behalf of its regional partners, PSA and Piedmont. 2 US Airways’ previous certificate and exemption authorities for various Open Skies countries were superseded by this order.

### 8
None Blanket route integration Order 2010
- 12
- 24 Route 87 - F Atlanta, GA/Miami, FL/Tampa, FL/Washington, DC/Baltimore, MD/New York, NY/ Newark, NJ/New Orleans, LA/Dallas
- Ft. Worth, TX

– Belize Charlotte, NC/Baltimore, MD/Tampa, FL

– Nassau, Bahamas Tampa, FL/Washington, DC/Baltimore, MD/Charlotte, NC

– Cayman Islands Order 97
- 7
- 2 3

Route 97 - F Baltimore, MD/New York, NY/ Newark, NJ/ Boston, MA/Philadelphia, PA

– Bermuda Syracuse, NY/Cleveland, OH/Cincinnati, OH/ Philadelphia, P A/Pittsburgh, PA/ Baltimore, MD

– Freeport, George Town, Great Harbor Cay, Marsh Harbor, Nassau, Rock Sound, Treasure Cay and West End, Bahamas Order 97
- 7
- 2 4

3 Although US Airways has only listed the non

- Open Skies r outes that are not superseded by Order 2007

- 4

- 20, US Airways is requesti ng the transfer of all of the routes contained within the Order. 4 Although US Airways has only listed the non

- Open Skies r outes that are not superseded by Order 2007

- 4

- 20, US Airways is requesting the transfer of all of the routes contained within the Or der.

### 9
B. Exemption Authorities Route Description Order/NOAT Docket U.S.

– Antigua NOAT April 21, 2006 (timely renewal filed

– pending) Docket DOT
- OST
- 2001
- 9932 U.S.

– Buenos Aires, Argentina; Buenos Aires, Argentina

– Montevideo, Uruguay NOAT October 11, 2012 Docket DOT
- OST
- 2003
- 14650 U.S.

– China (pursuant to codeshare arrangements with United and Air China) NOAT May 3, 2010 (timely renewal filed

– pending Docket DOT
- OST
- 2008
- 0139 U.S.

– Bahamas NOAT September 9, 2013 Docket DOT
- OST
- 2001
- 9766 U.S.

– Barbados NOAT July 11, 2013 Docket DOT
- OST
- 2001
- 9769 U.S.

– St. Lucia NOAT July 11, 2013 Docket DOT
- OST
- 2001
- 9767 U.S.

– Belize NOAT July 29, 2013 Docket DOT
- OST
- 2002
- 12259 Charlotte, NC/Chicago, IL/Washington, DC

– Bermuda NOAT March 8, 2013 Docket DOT
- OST
- 2001
- 11152 Orlando, FL

– Hamilton, Bermuda NOAT January 26, 2006 (timely renewal filed

– pendin g) Docket DOT
- OST
- 2004
- 16899 U.S.

– Brazil (pursuant to codeshare arrangement with TAM) NOAT May 16, 2012 Docket DOT
- OST
- 2003
- 14651 U.S.

– Brazil Order 2013
- 7
- 4, July 3, 2013 Docket DOT
- OST
- 2013
- 0072 U.S.

– British Virgin Islands (pursuant to codeshare arrangement with Caribbean Sun Airlines) NOAT June 18, 2003 (timely renewal filed

– pending) 5 Docket DOT
- OST
- 2003
- 15254
Philadelphia, PA

– Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands NOAT July 29, 2013 Docket DOT
- OST
- 1997
- 2721 U.S.

– Colombia (codeshare only) (pursuant to codeshare arrangement with Avianca or any other authorized carrier) NOAT November 16, 2012 Docket DOT
- OST
- 2012
- 0155
U.S.

– Dominica U.S.

– Haiti NOAT May 29, 2012 Docket DOT
- OST
- 2004
- 18346 U.S.

– Dominican Republic NOAT November 6, 2012 Docket DOT
- OS T
- 2000
- 7340 U.S.

– Grenada NOAT June 4, 2013 Docket DOT
- OST
- 2001
- 10588 U.S.

– Fiji, and beyond to New Zealand NOAT April 15, 2013 Docket DOT
- OST
- 2007
- 29026

5 This renewal application technically remains pending; however, US Airways’ no longer codeshares with Caribbean Sun Airlines.

### 10
U.S.

– Hong Kong (codeshare service) NOAT August 20, 2007 (timely renewal filed

– pending) Docket DOT
- OST
- 2003
- 14303 U.S.

– Moscow and St. Petersburg, Russia (under a third
- country codeshare arrangement) 6 Order 2008
- 11
- 5 and NOAT August 13, 2012 DOT
- OST
- 2008
- 0283
Boston, MA/Charlotte, NC/ Philadelphia, PA

– Cancun Mexico NOAT June 21, 2013 Docket DOT
- OST
- 2002
- 13855 Charlotte, NC

– Cozumel, Mexico NOAT November 6, 2012 Docket DOT
- OST
- 2001
- 9768 Charlotte, NC

– Mexico City, Mexico NOAT January 17, 2013 Docket DOT
- OST
- 2003
- 14575 U.S.

– Saba U.S.

– St. Eustatius U.S.

– St. Barthelemy (pursuant to cod eshare arrangement with Winward Islands Airways) NOAT December 16, 2002 (timely renewal filed

– pending) Docket DOT
- OST
- 2002
- 13705

U.S.

– St. Kitts and Nevis NOAT February 16, 2006 (timely renewal filed

– pending) Docket DOT
- OST
- 2001
- 10589 U.S.

– St. Vi ncent and the Grenadines (pursuant to codeshare arrangement with Caribbean Sun Airlines) NOAT May 19, 2004 (timely renewal filed

– pending) 7 Docket DOT
- OST
- 2003
- 16061
U.S.

– Turks and Caicos NOAT January 24, 2013 Docket DOT
- OST
- 2002
- 12208 Phoenix, AZ

– C ancun, Mexico NOAT June 21, 2013 Docket DOT
- OST
- 2006
- 24613 Phoenix, AZ

– Guadalajara, Mexico NOAT July 26, 2013 Docket DOT
- OST
- 2007
- 0025 Phoenix, AZ

– Hermosillo, Mexico (codeshare only) NOAT May 7, 2013 Docket DOT
- OST
- 2005
- 22645 Phoenix, AZ

– Mexico Cit y/ Mazatlan/Puerto Vallerta/San Jose del Cabo/Acapulco/ Ixtapa
- Zihuatanejo/ Manzanillo, Mexico NOAT May 7, 2013 Docket DOT
- OST
- 2007
- 29308

Los Angeles, CA/San Francisco, CA

– Cancun, Mexico Los Angeles, CA

– San Jose del Cabo, Mexico NOAT June 21, 2013 D ocket DOT
- OST
- 2009
- 0172

Charlotte, NC

– San Jose del Cabo, Mexico NOAT September 19, 2013 Docket DOT
- OST
- 2010
- 0040

6 US Airways is currently authorized by DOT to codeshare with Swiss International Air Lines, for codeshare service on thes e routes over Zurich, Switzerland (ZRH). 7 This renewal application technically remains pending; however, US Airways’ no longer codeshares with Caribbean Sun Airlines.

### 11
U.S.

– Abijan, Cote d’Ivoire/ Bujumbura, Burundi/ Conakry, Guinea/Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo/Freetown, Sierra Leone/ Luanda, A ngola/ Lome, Togo NOAT February 7, 2012 Docket DOT
- OST
- 2010
- 0043

U.S.

– Johannesburg/Cape Town/Durban/East London/Port Elizabeth, South Africa NOAT December 4, 2012 Docket DOT
- OST
- 2012
- 0189 Points in the U.S.

– Points worldwide on a third
- country codesha re basis pursuant to an arrangement with the TACA Group carriers NOAT October 18, 2013 Docket DOT
- OST
- 2009
- 0261

C. Frequency Allocations
Number of Frequencies Route Description Order/NOAT 7 Charlotte

– Sao Paulo, Brazil Order 2013
- 7
- 4 (effective October 1, 2014) 7 Charlotte

– Rio de Janeiro, Brazil NOAT August 2, 2010 D. Codesharing Statements of Authorization Airline Partner Route Description Order/NOAT/ Department Action Docket TAP Air Portugal* Blanket Statements of Authorization for reciprocal co desharing Department Action May 17, 2006 Docket DOT
- OST
2006
- 24670 Royal Jordanian* Statements of Authorization for US Airways to display “RJ” Designator Code NOAT March 1, 2007 Docket DOT
- OST
2007
- 27347
EVA Airways* Blanket Statement of Authorization to display “BR” designator code Department Action January 8, 2010 Docket DOT
- OST
2007
- 27352 Singapore Airlines* Blanket Statement of Authorization for reciprocal codesharing Department Action August 20, 2007 Joint Notice of Blanket Codesharing filed March 18, 2009 Docket DOT
- OST
2007
- 28084

Asiana Airlines* Blanket Statements of Authorization for reciprocal codesharing Department Action November 30, 2007 Joint Notice of Docket DOT
- OST
2007
- 0059

### 12
Blanket Codesharing filed March 31, 2009 Air New Zealand* Bl anket Statements of Authorization for reciprocal codesharing Department Action September 11, 2007 Joint Notice of Blanket Codesharing filed July 13, 2009 Docket DOT
- OST
2007
- 29024

Swiss International Airlines* Blanket Statements of Authorization for reci procal codesharing Department Action April 8, 2008 Joint Notice of Blanket Codesharing filed March 9, 2009 Notice of Russia codesharing filed May 21, 2012 Docket DOT
- OST
2008
- 0101

Air China* Statements of Authorization for reciprocal codesharing NOAT Ju ne 5, 2008 Docket DOT
- OST
2008
- 0139 TACA/LACSA/TACA
Peru* Blanket Statements of Authorization for reciprocal codesharing NOAT November 12, 2009 Docket DOT
- OST
2009
- 0261 TAM* Blanket Statements of Authorization for reciprocal codesharing NOAT June 15, 201 0 Docket DOT
- OST
2010
- 0127 Turkish Airlines* Blanket Statements of Authorization for reciprocal codesharing Department Action July 29, 2010 Docket DOT
- OST
2010
- 0184 Qatar Airways* Blanket Statements of Authorization for reciprocal codesharing Department Action May 6, 2009 Docket DOT
- OST
2009
- 0079 Aegean Airlines* Statements of Authorization for reciprocal codesharing Department Action July 12, 2011 Docket DOT
- OST
2011
- 0120 ANA and Air Japan* Blanket Statements of Authorization for reciprocal codeshari ng Department Action September 14, 2009 Docket DOT
- OST
2009
- 0181 Brussels Airlines* Blanket Statements of Authorization for reciprocal codesharing NOAT March 18, 2010 Docket DOT
- OST
2010
- 0042 Lufthansa* Statements of Authorization for reciprocal codes haring NOAT October 10, 2003 (amended October 16, 2003 and January 11, Docket DOT
- OST
2003
- 15946

### 13 2005) Joint Notice of Blanket Codesharing filed July 27, 2009 Avianca* Statements of Authorization for reciprocal codesharing NOAT November 16, 2012 Docket DOT
- OST
2012
- 0155 South African Airways* Statements of Authorization for reciprocal codesharing NOAT December 4, 2012 Docket DOT
- OST
2012
- 0189 Croatia Airlines* Blanket Statements of Authorization for reciprocal codesharing NOAT June 6, 2012 Docket DOT
- OST
2012
- 0084

IV. PSA AIRLINES, INC. A. Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity

Route # Route Order 819 U.S.

– Canada Order 2004
- 5
- 22 B. Exemption Authorities
Route Description Order/NOAT Docket U.S.

– Bahamas NOAT June 1, 2012 Docket DOT
- OS T
- 2004
- 18017 U.S.

– Turks and Caicos NOAT April 20, 2012 Docket DOT
- OST
- 2004
- 18811SERVICE LIST FOR AMERICAN AIRLINES , INC. ENVOY AIR , INC. US AIRWAYS , INC. PSA AIRLINES , INC
. PIEDMONT AIRLINES, INC. howard.kass@usairways.com benjamin.slocum@usairways.com robert.wirick@aa.com francis.heil@aa.com urskr@state.gov john.allen@faa.gov dan.weiss@united.com ste ve.morrisey@united.com karin.faden@united.com jonathan.linde@united.com sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com jhill@dowlohnes.com perkmann@dowlohnes.com robert.land@jetblue.com msinick@ssd.com jyoung@yklaw.com dkirsten@yklaw.com bob.kneisley@wnco.com leslie.abbott@wnco.com ethan.blank@rjet.com robert.cohn@hoganlovells.com patrick.rizzi@hoganlovells.com john.fredericksen@suncountry.com rpommer@atlasair.com anita.mosner@hklaw.com jennifer.nowak@h klaw.com cefelts@fedex.com nssparks@fedex.com kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com matwood@cozen.com calvin.lott@faa.dot.gov garland.s.choate@faa.dot.gov mark.mulkey@faa.dot.gov richard.sykes@faa.dot.gov chester.piolunek@faa.dot.gov 

### United States Senate, Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation United States House of Representat ives, Committee on Transportation and

Infrastructure ATTACHMENT F