alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The Toronto General Trust Company, as Trustee, etc., Respondent, *v.*The Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Company et al., Appellants.

(Submitted June 18,1884 ;

decided June 27, 1884.)

*Theron G. Strong*for appellants.

*F. K. Pendleton*for respondent.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Order affirmed.
10.001 Policy.    (b) All Sources Sought Notices (SSN) and Requests for Information (RFI) for acquisitions with an estimated value exceeding $5M, with the exception of the Sole Source Notice of Intent, shall be forwarded to the          DISA Office of Small Business Programs (OSBP)for review to ensure, for example, potential sources are not requested to submit more than the minimum information necessary. OSBP has 5 business days to complete the review. **Parent topic:** PART 10 – MARKET RESEARCH
Subpart 1334.0 - General

Parent topic: PART 1334 - MAJOR SYSTEM ACQUISITION

1334.003 Responsibilities.

(a) The designee authorized to carry out the responsibilities described under FAR 34.003 is set forth

in CAM 1301.70.

(b) Agency procedures related to major system acquisitions are set forth in DAO 208-3.

1334.005 General requirements.

1334.005-6 Full production.

The designee authorized to reaffirm mission need and program objectives and grant approval to

proceed with the award of a contract for full production of a successfully tested major system is set

forth in CAM 1301.70.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

WILLIE MCNAIR, )

)

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2:06-cv-695-WKW

)

RICHARD ALLEN, et al., )

)

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. )

____________________________________

)

JAMES CALLAHAN, )

)

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2:06-cv-919-WKW

)

RICHARD ALLEN, et al., )

)

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the defendants file a response to Plaintiff Callahan’s Motion to Stay

(Doc. #147) on or before November 26, 2007 at 3:30 p.m. (CST).

DONE this 20th day of November, 2007.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 149 Filed 11/20/2007 Page 1 of 1
REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH
                   1122(d)(2)(vi) and 1122(d)(4)(xi)
                   of REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA


American Security Insurance Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company and
Safeco Financial Institution Solutions, Inc. (affiliates of Assurant Inc.,
collectively the "Asserting Party") is responsible for assessing compliance
as of December 31, 2006 and for the period from January 1, 2006 through
December 31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period") with the servicing criteria set
forth in 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(4)(xi) and 1122(d)(4)(xii) of Title 17,
229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations, which the Asserting Party has
concluded are applicable to the insurance escrow servicing activities it
performs with respect to all mortgage loan-tracking transactions covered by
this report. The transactions covered by this report include all mortgage
loan-tracking transactions for which the Asserting Party served as a Vendor
on behalf of Servicers for such asset-backed securities transactions that
were registered after January 1, 2006 with the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Platform"). The scope
of the Asserting Party assertions excludes 1122(d)(4)(xii) of Title 17,
229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations, which relates to servicing
activities that are performed by the Asserting Party with respect to the
Platform, but are not reported on herein.

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with 1122(d)(2)(vi) and
1122(d)(4)(xi) ("the Applicable Servicing Criteria") for the Reporting
Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has complied, in all
material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting
Period with respect to the Platform taken as a whole. The Asserting Party
used the criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to
assess the compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

The Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm,
has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Reporting Period ending
December 31, 2006 as set forth in this assertion.

     American Security Insurance Company
     Standard Guaranty Insurance Company
     Safeco Financial Institution Solutions, Inc.


/S/        John Frobose
-------------------------------
       By: John Frobose
       Senior Vice President


       Date: February 23, 2007
§ 958.21 Procedure. ( a ) Seven members of the committee shall be necessary to constitute a quorum and seven concurring votes shall be required to pass any motion or approve any committee action.
( b ) The committee may provide for voting by telephone, telegraph, or other means of communication and any such vote shall be confirmed promptly in writing: *Provided,* That if an assembled meeting is held, all votes shall be cast in person.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Elementary Secondary EducationFutures (of Society)Information DisseminationInformation LiteracyInformation RetrievalInformation ScienceInformation TechnologyRelevance (Information Retrieval)ResearchStandardsUsers (Information)Work Environment

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
Case 3:06-cv-00713-MHT-SRW Document 9 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JENNIFER CASTRO,

Plaintiff, 

v. 4:21cv52–WS/MAF

WARDEN STRONG,

Defendant.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF

No. 30) docketed August 24, 2021. The magistrate judge recommends that the

plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction (ECF No. 5) be denied. Plaintiff has

filed no objections to the report and recommendation.

Upon review of the record, this court has determined that the report and

recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF No. 30) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order of the court.

2. The plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction (ECF No. 5) is

Case 4:21-cv-00052-WS-MAF Document 33 Filed 10/29/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

DENIED.

3. The clerk shall refer the case to the magistrate judge for further

proceedings.

DONE AND ORDERED this 29th day of October , 2021.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:21-cv-00052-WS-MAF Document 33 Filed 10/29/21 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          19,206
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             570
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     70,525
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        411,136
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,537
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 527,421
<DEPOSITS>                                     413,883
<SHORT-TERM>                                    22,375
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              5,513
<LONG-TERM>                                     28,070
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,554
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,026
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 527,421
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  9,186
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,054
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    82
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                10,408
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,867
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,559
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            5,849
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      129
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  25
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,028
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,839
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,891
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,891
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .41
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.13
<LOANS-NON>                                        604
<LOANS-PAST>                                       179
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   580
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    518
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,497
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      100
<RECOVERIES>                                        11
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,537
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,537
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r 136465 Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, J ustices PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 136465 COA: 283499 Otsego CC: 07-003720-FH KODY ALLEN PADGETT, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the March 26, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be review ed by this Court. The denial is without prejudice to the defendant seekin g relief, pursuant to MCR 6.500, et seq. , as to the new issues raised in his application supplement.

d0915 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 22, 2008

Clerk
1 

## Revision1 The Name and Address of the Applicant is: Anthony J. Marino President Low Country RC, Corporation 3104 River Drive Thunderbolt, GA 31404 (912) 257- 9617 Jan uary 15, 2015 Ms Nia Daniels RE: Additional Information Docket ID: FAA -2014-0803 LowCountryRD, Corporation - Exemption/Rule making Dear Ms Daniels: Pursuant to our phone conversation of January 15, 2015 I will update our filling with this revision. After discussing your email information requests with the pilot/engineer, he suggested we just submit excerpts of the S - 1000 manual and specification for the associated peripheral devices. He explained our Drones are assembled from commercially available modules each of which carries its own certification of compliance. He further offered that the FAA’s concern in addition to its airworthiness and safety is “will it cause radio interference with other devices in its proximity”. LOCORC uses multi counter- rotating propellers for extreme balance, control and stability like the one depicted here. It is configured using a DJI S- 1000 Spreading W ings platform. T he typical configuration weigh s much less than 55 pounds , inclu ding camera, gimbal, Flight controller, etc. Each of LOCORC’s small unmanned aircraft is designed to primarily hover in place and will be operated at less than a 12 knot maximum speed . It is 1000 millimeters wide. Each of the components used carries certification that it has been tested and found to comply with the limits for a Class A digital device pursuant to Part 15 of the FCC rules. The Futaba 14SG (shown below) is a 2.4 GHz Telemetry system . The WooKong - M (shown below) is a Multi - Rotor Stabilization Controller (AutoPilot). The A2 Flight Controller is matched to the particular Telemetry system in this case, the Fatuba.2

S - 1000 Ty

pical configuration

Fatuba Flight Controller34
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 239 (Tuesday, December 14, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77921-77922]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31294]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION


Post Office Closing

AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Regulatory Commission published a document in the 
Federal Register of November 30, 2010 concerning an appeal of the 
closing of the Graves Mill, Virginia post office. The procedural 
schedule that appeared after ordering paragraph number 5 contained two 
incorrect entries. This document corrects those entries.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel, 
at 202-789-6824 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f2818697829a979cdc819a9380949f939cb2828091dc959d84"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6e1d1a0b1e060b00401d060f1c08030f002e1e1c0d40090118">[email protected]</span></a>.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of November 30, 2010, in FR Doc. 2010-
30075, on page 74109, in the table that appears following ordering 
paragraph number 5 in the third column of text, correct the Procedural 
Schedule by (i) deleting the entry for December 13, 2010 in the first 
column of the table in its entirety and deleting the corresponding 
description in the second column of the table; and (ii) with respect to 
the December 27, 2010 entry in the first column of the

[[Page 77922]]

table, deleting the corresponding entry in the second column of the 
table in its entirety and replacing it with the following description: 
Deadline for Petitioner's Form 61 or initial brief in support of 
petition (see 39 CFR 3001.115(a) and (b)).

    Dated: December 9, 2010.
Shoshana M. Grove,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-31294 Filed 12-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
120 STAT. 682 PUBLIC LAW 109–269—AUG. 12, 2006

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3682 (S. 2127):

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 109–433 (Comm. on Resources).

SENATE REPORTS: No. 109–258 accompanying S. 2127 (Comm. on Environment

and Public Works).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):

May 16, considered and passed House.

Aug. 1, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–269

109th Congress

An Act

To redesignate the Mason Neck National Wildlife Refuge in Virginia as the Elizabeth

Hartwell Mason Neck National Wildlife Refuge.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIZABETH HARTWELL MASON NECK NATIONAL WILDLIFE

REFUGE.

(a) REDESIGNATION.—The Mason Neck National Wildlife Refuge

in Virginia, is hereby redesignated and shall be known as the

‘‘Elizabeth Hartwell Mason Neck National Wildlife Refuge’’.

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation,

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the

National Wildlife Refuge in Virginia referred to in subsection (a)

shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Elizabeth Hartwell Mason

Neck National Wildlife Refuge’’.

Approved August 12, 2006.

16 USC 668dd

note.

Aug. 12, 2006

[H.R. 3682]
5230.202-2 Impracticability of submission.

Submit requests for impracticability determinations to DASN(P) at least 60 days prior to anticipated

contract award by email at usn.pentagon.asstsecnavrdadc.mbx.pabt@us.navy.mil with the subject

“[Activity Name] DFARS 230.202-2 – Impracticability Determination.” Include the estimated date of

contract award.

Parent topic: 5230.202 Disclosure requirements.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Centenary International Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carlos Fabian De Sousa, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.




/s/ Carlos Fabian De
  SousaCarlos
      Fabian De SousaChief
      Financial OfficerNovember
      11, 2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The
foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q solely
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and are not
being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure
document.
#### § 97.400 Extensions of time.

Upon a showing of good cause, extensions of time not otherwise provided for may be granted by the Commissioner or, if an appeal has been filed by the Secretary for taking any action required in any priority, protest, or appeal proceeding.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3040 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3040

      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Vulkalent E/C.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

  Mr. Graham introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Vulkalent E/C.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF EXISTING DUTY SUSPENSION ON VULKALENT E/C.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.38.31 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Vulkalent E/C) is amended by 
striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/
2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Subpart 1319.2 - Policies.

Parent topic: PART 1319 - SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS

1319.201 General policy.

(a) The DOC Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization (OSDBU) is headed by a

Director who shall report and be responsible to the Deputy Secretary on matters of policy and

legislative requirements.

(b) Each Contracting Office shall appoint Small Business Specialists to assist the HCA in effectively

implementing the small business programs, including achieving program goals.

1319.202 Specific policies.

Procurement actions valued above $100,000 will be reviewed by the Director, OSDBU, or designee

for the purpose of making recommendations for solicitation/award under FAR Part 19.

1319.202-70 Small business set-aside review form.

Form CD 570, Small Business Set-Aside Review, shall be submitted for approval to the Operating

Unit Counsel Small Business Specialist, and forwarded to the OSDBU for approval. If applicable, the

Form CD 570 will be submitted to the SBA Procurement Center Representative (PCR) for review.

The Form CD 570 is required for:

(a) Procurement actions valued above $100,000;

(b) Modifications to existing contracts that add new work valued over $550,000 or that increase the

total contract cost to over $550,000;

(c) Consolidation of two or more procurement requirements for goods and services.
(June 25, 1970)

#### Francis X. Smith, Individually, and as President of the City Council of the City of New York, Respondent, v. Donald H. Elliott, Individually, and as Chairman of the New York City Planning Commission, et al., Appellants.

Order and judgment (one paper) entered November 20, 1969, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs and without disbursements, motion denied and petition dismissed. The plan was not subject to public inspection since it was incomplete. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Eager, McGivern, Nunez and McNally, JJ. [61 Misc 2d 163.]
§ 985.29 Procedure. ( a ) At an assembled meeting, all votes shall be cast in person and seven members of the Committee shall constitute a quorum. Decisions of the Committee shall require the concurring vote of at least six members. If both a Committee member and appropriate alternate are unable to attend a Committee meeting, the Committee may designate any other alternate from the same district who is present at the meeting to serve in the member's place.
( b ) The Committee may vote by mail, telephone, telegraph, or other means of communication: *Provided,* That each proposition is explained accurately, fully, and identically to each member. All votes shall be confirmed promptly in writing. Seven concurring votes and no dissenting votes shall be required for approval of a Committee action by such method.