alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### •.^rMMENTO h ,,.-. , - , :.'ASPORTATIO N lliilill l :?DIC S :?iiiJit-E T OPERATION S Janui,rvll.20l l ' H M ' 3 A Ih 0 0

Mr . Ra y LdMDo d Secretar y I'nitc d State s Dcpattme mo l Tniiisporiatjot t !2U 0 New Jerse y Aveimt' , Sl { Washington . D

C 205 % Dea r Secretar y l. M Umd : i ar n writin g t o expres s m

y suppor t tbnh c recomnicnctiuio n suhmitic d b y !l; c HaJ l t'ount y Airppr t Aulhciril y tbrCcnira l Nebrask aRegional Airpor t Essential Ai r

Servic e funding to r

direc t ai r Jicr^'ic e t o Dallas . Central Nebrask aRegiona l Airport , recipien t

o f th e 20(W . 2007 . an d 200 6 Nebrask a Department

o f Aeronautic s Airpor

t o f th e Yea r award , isas i important

central Nebrask a imnspcfrtation hu b tha

t serve s more tha n 3 0 rura

l communitie s withi n a'>0-miie radius, an d . other s beyond , llies e ciiimiiunitie & wil l heneH t ilircv;ll y Im mexpande d direc t

ai r servic e options , includin g adirec t

tl3y;h ! to DaHiuv

. Than k yo u fo r you r consideration . Sinccreh' .

Mik e .(ohann s ^ L'lUte d State s Senato r
#### ALLEN, Respondent, v. PIERSON et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

July 12, 1906.)

Action by Addie A. Allen against Albert H. Pierson and others.

No opinion. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted, and questions for review certified.
52.236-23 Responsibility of the ArchitectEngineer Contractor.

As prescribed in 36.609-2(b), insert the following clause:

Responsibility of the Architect-Engineer Contractor (Apr 1984)

(a) The Contractor shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, and the

coordination of all designs, drawings, specifications, and other services furnished by the Contractor

under this contract. The Contractor shall, without additional compensation, correct or revise any

errors or deficiencies in its designs, drawings, specifications, and other services.

(b) Neither the Government’s review, approval or acceptance of, nor payment for, the services

required under this contract shall be construed to operate as a waiver of any rights under this

contract or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of this contract, and the Contractor

shall be and remain liable to the Government in accordance with applicable law for all damages to

the Government caused by the Contractor’s negligent performance of any of the services furnished

under this contract.

(c) The rights and remedies of the Government provided for under this contract are in addition to

any other rights and remedies provided by law.

(d) If the Contractor is comprised of more than one legal entity, each such entity shall be jointly and

severally liable hereunder.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.236 [Reserved]
§ 51.1401 U.S. Fancy. “U.S. Fancy” consists of pecans in the shell which meet the following requirements: ( a ) Free from loose extraneous or foreign material.
( b ) Shells are: ( 1 ) Uniform in color; and
( 2 ) Free from damage by any cause.
( c ) Kernels are: ( 1 ) Fairly well developed;
( 2 ) Well cured;
( 3 ) Moisture content shall be not more than 6 percent, unless otherwise specified;
( 4 ) Uniform in color;
( 5 ) Not darker than “light amber,” unless specified to a lighter color classification; and
( 6 ) Free from damage by any cause.
( d ) For tolerances see § 51.1406.
•

•

\

Attachment F

Map: Universe of Closure/Corrective Action/Permit Facilities in

Oregon, December 1994

': ::.. '. ' , ".' ?,:;:..:' ''','" :- .' . .. ' .
\

Malhour

* COMMERCIAL TSDF'S

Harnoy

Laka

Klamath

"

i;:,

\

UNIVERSE eji CUflRENT i

CLOSURE/CORRECTIVE . , '. ACTION/PERMIT I FACILITIES

DECEMBER 199~i

1

1

CHEM! WASTE MANAGEMENT* >

•

/ -:;\

,.,

I

i ;

."MPI.......

.. '" .,'

.' •• I

'.'
**Exhibit  31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

I, David Balai, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A and all reports on Form 10-D required  to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of  Permanent Master Issuer Plc (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreements; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Halifax plc, as servicer.

Date:  28th September 2007

 

/s/  David Balai                   

David Balai

Director,  Permanent Funding (No. 2) Limited, as Depositor
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 1 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 1 of 7
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 1 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 2 of 7
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 1 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 3 of 7
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 1 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 4 of 7
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 1 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 5 of 7
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 1 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 6 of 7
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 1 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 7 of 7
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 1-2 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 1-2 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 1-2 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 3 of 3
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Authority:

7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 800.125 Who may request reinspection services or review of weighing services.

(a) *General.* Any interested person may request a reinspection or review of weighing service, except as provided for in § 800.86(c)(5). Only one reinspection service or review of weighing service may be performed on any original service. When more than one interested person requests a reinspection or review of weighing service, the first person to file is the applicant of record.

(b) *Kind and scope of request.* A reinspection or review of weighing service is limited to the kind and scope of the original service. If the request specifies a different kind or scope, the request shall be dismissed but may be resubmitted as a request for original services: Provided, however, that an applicant for service may request a reinspection of a specific factor(s), official grade and factors, or official criteria. In addition, reinspections for grade may include a review of any pertinent factor(s), as deemed necessary by official personnel. Official criteria are considered separately from official grade or official factors when determining the kind and scope. When requested, a reinspection for official grade or official factors and official criteria may be handled separately even though both sets of results are reported on the same certificate. Moreover, a reinspection or review of weighing may be requested on either the inspection or Class X weighing results when both results are reported on a combination inspection and Class X weight certificate.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0580-0013)

[50 FR 45393, Oct. 31, 1985, as amended at 54 FR 5924, Feb. 7, 1989; 55 FR 24048, June 13, 1990; 68 FR 61328, Oct. 28, 2003]
# L_2014107EN.01005601.xml

| 10.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 107/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 107/56

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 362/2014

of 9 April 2014

correcting the Spanish language version of Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 315/93 of 8 February 1993 laying down Community procedures for contaminants in food (1), and in particular Article 2(3) thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EU) No 1258/2011 of 2 December 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 as regards maximum levels for nitrates in foodstuffs (2), and in particular Article 1(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An error has occurred in the Spanish language version of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 (3) and its amendment by Regulation (EU) No 1258/2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 as regards maximum levels for nitrates in foodstuffs. Therefore a correction of the text of the table in the Annex of the Spanish language version of Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 is necessary. The other languages are not affected. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An error has occurred in the Spanish language version of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 (3) and its amendment by Regulation (EU) No 1258/2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 as regards maximum levels for nitrates in foodstuffs. Therefore a correction of the text of the table in the Annex of the Spanish language version of Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 is necessary. The other languages are not affected.

| (2) | Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 should therefore be corrected accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 should therefore be corrected accordingly.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health and neither the European Parliament nor the Council have opposed them, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health and neither the European Parliament nor the Council have opposed them,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

(Only concerns the Spanish language version.)

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 April 2014.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 37, 13.2.1993, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 320, 3.12.2011, p. 15.

2

(3)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 of 19 December 2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs (OJ L 364, 20.12.2006, p. 5).

3

---
§ 959.50 Marketing policy. ( a ) At the beginning of each season, and as the Secretary may require, the committee shall prepare a marketing policy. Such policy shall indicate the data on onion supplies and demand on which the committee bases its judgments and recommendations. It shall indicate also the kind or types of regulations contemplated during the ensuing season, and, to the extent practical, shall include recommendations for specific regulations. Notice of such marketing policy shall be given to producers, handlers, and other interested parties by bulletins, newspapers, or other appropriate media, and copies thereof shall be submitted to the Secretary and shall be available generally.
( b ) Marketing policy statements relating to recommendations for regulations shall give appropriate consideration to onion supplies for the season, with special consideration to: ( 1 ) Estimates of total supplies, including grade, size, and quality thereof, in the production area;
( 2 ) Estimates of supplies in the competing areas;
( 3 ) Market prices by grades, sizes, containers, and packs;
( 4 ) Estimates of supplies of competing commodities;
( 5 ) Anticipated marketing problems;
( 6 ) Level and trend of consumer income; and
( 7 ) Other relevant factors.
Exhibit 32.1

STATEMENT PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Allied Nevada Gold Corp. (the Corporation) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned officer of the
Corporation does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: March 11, 2010 |  | /S/    SCOTT A.
CALDWELL             
|                     |  | Scott A. Caldwell,                   
|                     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Corporation and will be retained by the Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of First Community Financial Corporation (the Company) for the period ended June 30,
2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, James R. McLaughlin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the
Report.



|                      |  |     |  |                                     
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------
|                      |  |    
|Date: August 10, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ James R. McLaughlin             
|                      |  |     |  | James R. McLaughlin, President & CEO
Case 2:06-mj-00076-SRW Document 3 Filed 08/01/2006 Page 1 of 1
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-30917 Conference Calendar

__________________ DONNA ANCAR, wife of/and; TROY ANCAR, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CV-1560 - - - - - - - - - - April 19, 1996 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Donna Ancar and Troy Ancar appeal the judgment of the district court dismissing their action for damages under the Public Vessels Act pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). They concede that Supreme Court precedent is adverse to their position and argue that the prior decisions are flawed in concept and methodology. The appeal is without arguable merit and is dismissed as frivolous. APPEAL DISMISSED.
Exhibit 32.2

STATEMENT PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Allied Nevada Gold Corp. (the Corporation) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned officer of the
Corporation does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                                     
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 11, 2010 |  | /S/    HAL D.
KIRBY                                 
|                     |  | Hal D. Kirby,                                       
|                     |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Corporation and will be retained by the Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
281333.1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

STEVE ADAMS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

MERCHANTS FOODSERVICE, et al., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CIVIL ACTION NO. 

2:06-cv-00707-ID-CSC 

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), plaintiff and defendant 

hereby stipulate that this action should be dismissed with prejudice, with each party to 

bear their own costs, including attorneys’ fees. 

Respectfully submitted this 9th day of November, 2007.

s/ Derrick Blythe s/ J. Tobias Dykes 

Derrick Blythe (ASB-8223-B58B) 

E-mail: dblythe@earthlink.net

126 Marshall Street 

Alexander City, Alabama 35010 

Phone: (256) 234-4101 

J. Tobias Dykes (ASB-0483-E66J) 

E-mail: tdykes@constangy.com

Direct Dial No.: (205) 226-5469 

CONSTANGY, BROOKS & SMITH, LLC 

Suite 900, One Federal Place 

1819 Fifth Avenue North 

Birmingham, AL 35203 

Facsimile: (205) 323-7674 

Case 2:06-cv-00707-ID-CSC Document 30 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 1 of 1
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 18

- 00582

- CR

Joseph Anthony MENDOZA

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR12469A

Honorable Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED October 31, 2018.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez , Justice
###### Editorial Note on Part 982

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 61 FR 17559, Apr. 22, 1996.

#### § 982.88 Amendments.

Amendments to this subpart may be proposed, from time to time, by any person or by the Board.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

B.B., a minor, by and )

through his mother and )

next friend, OWENA KNOWLES, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 3:06cv715-MHT

) 

PAWN CITY, INC., a )

corporation, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED as follows:

(1) The notice of withdrawal (doc. no. 14) is

treated as a motion to withdraw.

(2) The motion to withdraw is granted.

(3) The cross claim at issue is withdrawn.

DONE, this the 14th day of December, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 15 Filed 12/14/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### § 966.17 District.

*District* means each one of the geographic divisions of the production area initially established pursuant to § 966.24, or as reestablished pursuant to § 966.25.
14910-13-PI DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPORTATION 

# ----

_n 

# -,- -'- -r. 1~,Jn, ~ 

# .. 

# -_. -If

~ 

# ~. 11 /0. 

## to

__ S""b:><. 

## tol (DOT). Airplanes ACTION: Final rule; request forcommenlS. SUMMARY: We are adopting a

# Jw airworthiness directive (AD) fortheproducts list above. This AD results from manJtOry continuing airworthiness information (MeAn originated by an aviation authority

# hranother-country to identify and correct an unsafe



# I condition on an aviation product. The 

### MeAl describes the Wlsafe condition as: On two occurrences on 

### MJtere-FalCOn 50 aeroplanes in service, it was detected that two pipes oftlie emetgencybrake system #2located near the nose landing gear bearing Jere swappecl The swapping of these twO~iPes implies that when the Left Hand (LH) brake pedal is depressed. tile RightHand (RH) brake unit is activated. and conversely. when the RH bbke pedalis depressed, the LH brake unil is octuated. This constitutes 

# ah unsafe condition, which may go unnoticed as the condition is latent UDti1lthe emergency brake system #2 isused. This condition, if not corrected, could ultimately lead 10a runway excursion of the aeroplane. AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department ofTransportation Airworthiness Directivesj DASSAULT AVIATION Model MYSTERE~FALCON 50 RIN 2120-AA64 Federal Aviation Administration 14CFR Part 39 { 0-



# r 5"d [Docket No. FAA·201o-+t-++; DirJetorate Identifier 2010-NM-238-AD; Amendme 

# (Co5.;l/ 2-4~0

# 8 39··"-*; AD 2011)..**·•..• ]



## • • • • 

# • • • FAA Form 1360-14.1 (&.891 IAl ALE copy