alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 1 of 21
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 2 of 21
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 3 of 21
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 4 of 21
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 5 of 21
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 6 of 21
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 7 of 21
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 8 of 21
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 9 of 21
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 10 of 21
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 11 of 21
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 12 of 21
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 13 of 21
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 14 of 21
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 15 of 21
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 16 of 21
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 17 of 21
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 18 of 21
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 19 of 21
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 20 of 21
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 21 of 21
Case 2:06-cr-00179-MHT-CSC Document 17 Filed 12/14/2006 Page 1 of 1
446.370 Inspection and acceptance.

The Contracting Officer shall insert the clause at 452.246-70, Inspection and Acceptance, in

contracts where inspection and acceptance will be performed at the same location. The clause with

its Alternate I is for use when inspection and acceptance will be performed at different locations.

Parent topic: Subpart 446.3 - Contract Clauses
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

HOWARD GLENN TOOLE, )

#C 917 683 )

)

Petitioner, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv714-MHT

) (WO) 

JAMES McDONOUGH, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

OPINION

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254, petitioner, a state

inmate, filed this lawsuit seeking habeas relief. This

lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of

the United States Magistrate Judge that petitioner’s writ

petition be denied. Also before the court are

petitioner’s objections to the recommendation. After an

independent and de novo review of the record, the court

concludes that petitioner’s objections should be

overruled and the magistrate judge’s recommendation

adopted.

Case 2:06-cv-00714-MHT-WC Document 38 Filed 10/30/08 Page 1 of 2
An appropriate judgment will be entered.

DONE, this the 30th day of October, 2008.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00714-MHT-WC Document 38 Filed 10/30/08 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 57 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 57 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 57 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 3 of 3
#### § 983.88 Suspension or termination.

The Secretary shall terminate or suspend the operation of any or all of the provisions of this part, whenever he/she finds that such provisions do not tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act.

[69 FR 17850, Apr. 4, 2004. Redesignated at 74 FR 56540, Nov. 2, 2009]
MINUTES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

HON. MYRON H. THOMPSON, JUDGE AT MONTGOMERY ALABAMA

DATE COMMENCED December 14, 2006 AT 10:45 A.M./P.M.

DATE COMPLETED November 15, 2006 AT 10:53 A.M./P.M.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Criminal Action

2:06cr179-MHT

VS

JOHN TIERCE

 

PLAINTIFF(S) APPEARANCES DEFENDANT(S)

AUSA Terry F. Moorer X Atty Jeffrey C. Duffey

X

X

X

 X 

COURT OFFICIALS PRESENT:

Anthony Green, Danielle Goldstein, Risa Entrekin,

Courtroom Clerk Law Clerk Court Reporter

PROCEEDINGS:

( ) NONJURY TRIAL

(x) OTHER PROCEEDING: SENTENCING HEARING

10:45 a.m. Sentencing hearing commenced. Terms of plea

agreement stated on the record. Government

concurs with plea agreement. Probation

concurs with plea agreement. Sentence

imposed; ORAL ORDER during sentence

imposition granting motion for reduction in

criminal offense level and motion for

downward departure.

10:53 a.m. Hearing concluded.

Case 2:06-cr-00179-MHT-CSC Document 18-2 Filed 12/14/2006 Page 1 of 1
Subpart 1314.2 - Solicitation of Bids

Parent topic: PART 1314 - SEALED BIDDING

1314.201 Preparation of invitation for bids.

1314.201-7 Contract clauses.

The designee authorized to waive the requirement for inclusion of FAR clause 52.214-27 “Price

Reduction for Defective Cost and Pricing Data - Modifications - Sealed Bidding” in a contract with a

foreign government or agency of that government is set forth in CAM 1301.70.
157 So.2d 231

#### Alex BERGER v. Mrs. Anna Shirley BURGLASS, Divorced Wife of Joseph DeSALVO.

No. 46970.

Nov. 12, 1963.

In re: Alex Berger applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson. 156 So.2d 323.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal there appears no error of law in its judgment.
ANNEX 24 - CONTRACT CLOSEOUT METRIC REPORT       Pursuant to 5204.804-1 Closeout by the office administering the contract.(S-90), the template             below shall be used in reporting monthly contract closeout metrics. The electronic version of this template is available                on the website identified at NMCARS 5201.105-3 Copies..
§ 959.60 Inspection and certification. ( a ) Whenever the handling of onions is regulated pursuant to § 959.52, or at other times when recommended by the committee and approved by the Secretary, no handlers shall handle onions unless they are inspected by an authorized representative of the Federal or Federal-State Inspection Service and are covered by a valid inspection certificate, except when relieved from such requirements pursuant to § 959.52(c) or § 959.54, or paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) Regarding, resorting, or repacking any lot of onions shall invalidate any prior inspection certificate insofar as the requirements of this section are concerned. No handler shall handle onions after they have been regraded, resorted, or repacked unless such onions are inspected by an authorized representative of the Federal or Federal-State Inspection Service. Such inspection requirements on regraded, resorted, or repacked onions may be modified, suspended, or terminated upon recommendation by the committee and approval of the Secretary.
( c ) Upon recommendation of the committee and approval by the Secretary, any or all onions so inspected and certified shall be identified by appropriate seals, stamps, or tags to be affixed to the containers by the handler under the direction and supervision of a Federal or Federal-State Inspector or the Committee. Master containers may bear the identification instead of the individual containers within said master container.
( d ) At any time this marketing order is inoperative, compulsory inspection is not required.
( e ) Insofar as the requirements of this section are concerned, the length of time for which an inspection certificate is valid may be established by the committee with the approval of the Secretary.
( f ) When onions are inspected in accordance with the requirements of this section, a copy of each inspection certificate issued shall be made available to the committee by the Inspection Service.
( g ) The committee may recommend and the Secretary may require that no handler shall transport or cause the transportation of onions by motor vehicle or by other means unless such shipment is accompanied by a copy of the inspection certificate issued thereon, or other document authorized by the committee to indicate that such inspection has been performed. Such certificate or document shall be surrendered to such authority as may be designated.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,549,068
<SECURITIES>                                   918,135
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,467,203
<PP&E>                                      18,604,289
<DEPRECIATION>                                 224,876
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,071,492
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          133,054
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,938,438
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,071,492
<SALES>                                      1,395,934
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,486,230
<CGS>                                           63,448
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   63,448
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               437,306
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                985,476
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            985,476
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   985,476
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    14.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    14.26
        

</TABLE>
#### § 959.31 Alternate members.

An alternate member of the committee shall act in the place and stead of the member for whom he is an alternate, during such member's absence or when designated to do so by the member for whom he is an alternate. In the event both a member of the committee and his alternate are unable to attend a committee meeting, the member or his alternate or the committee (in that order) may designate another alternate from the same district and the same group (handler or grower) to serve in such member's place and stead. In the event of the death, removal, resignation, or disqualification of a member, his alternate shall act for him until a successor of such member is selected and has qualified. The committee may request the attendance of alternates at any or all meetings, notwithstanding the expected or actual presence of the respective members.

[27 FR 2278, Mar. 9, 1962]
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-21-00282-CV

__________________

CHRISTOPHER D. EUSTICE, Appellant

V.

PAYSAFE PAYMENT PROCESSING SOLUTIONS LLC, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 457th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 20-03-04135-CV

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Christopher D. Eustice appealed from a final judgment, signed on September 

1, 2021. But after that, Eustice failed to file the brief assigning a claim of error to the 

judgment that he appealed. After Eustice failed to meet the deadline for filing his 

brief, the Court, through the Clerk, notified him that his brief was past due. The 

Court also warned him that we would dismiss his appeal if he failed to file a brief or 

asked for an extension of time to do so on or before November 22, 2021. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). 
2

On December 7, 2021, the Court notified the parties that on December 28, 

2021, the Court had submitted the appeal on the recordwithout any briefs. By failing 

to comply with the Court’s instructions, Eustice failed to prosecute his appeal. For 

the reasons explained above, Eustice’s appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b); id. 43.2(f).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on December 28, 2021

Opinion Delivered January 13, 2022

Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
Searched for **http://bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/mhppji.pdf**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/mhppji.pdf**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
#### In the Matter of William R. Phillips, Appellant, v Robert Dennison, as Chairman of the New York State Board of Parole, Respondent.

Submitted June 4, 2007;

decided October 23, 2007

Reported below, 41 AD3d 17.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the issues presented have become moot.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

September 4, 2012

h0827

Order 

September 4, 2012

145243

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145243

COA: 308015

Jackson CC: 11-004183-FH

MICHAEL ANTHONY LOONEY,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 24, 2012 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EX-35 (i)
PHH Mortgage
(logo) PHH
4001 Leadenhall Road
Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054


March 7, 2007

WELLS FARGO BANK, NA
Servicer Oversight Group, Yvonne Williams
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Re:     Servicer Compliance Statement

Deal Name: MLMI 2006-AF1

Dear Sir and/or Madame:

This statement of compliance is being provided in accordance with Item 1123 of
Regulation AB. The Undersigned hereby states that:

1.      I am an authorized officer of PHH Mortgage Corporation (the "Servicer");

2.      A review of the Servicer's activities during the period from 09/01/2006
        (the "Reporting Period") and its performance under the Agreement has
        been made under my supervision; and

3.      To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, except as described
        in section 3(a) hereto, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its
        obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the
        Reporting Period.

        a. The Servicer did not maintain or provide one of the required monthly
           reports, specifically the S5L2 Fidelity report, as stated in the
           transaction agreement(s) for the Reporting period shown in section 2
           of this statement.


By: /s/ Deborah A. Rocchi
Name: Deborah A. Rocchi
Title: Assistant Vice President
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3320 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3320

     To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on low expansion 
                           laboratory glass.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 26, 2006

  Mr. Schumer (for himself and Mrs. Clinton) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on low expansion 
                           laboratory glass.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LOW EXPANSION LABORATORY GLASS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.04.32 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to low expansion laboratory 
glass) is amended by striking the date in the effective period column 
and inserting ``12/31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27485 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27486 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27487 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27488 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27489 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27490 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27491 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27492 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27493 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27494 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27495 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27496 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27497 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27498 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27499 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27500 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27501 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27502 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27503 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27504 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27505 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27506 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27507 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27508 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27509 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27510 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27511 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27512 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27513 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27514 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27515 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27516 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27517 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27518 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27519 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27520 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27521 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27522 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27523 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27524 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27525 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27526 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27527 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27528 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27529 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27530 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27531 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27532 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27533 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27534 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27535 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27536 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27537 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27538 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27539 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27540 1989
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27541 1989
Exhibit 35
                                  ----------


                         COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC.


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWHEQ, INC.
             CWHEQ REVOLVING HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST, SERIES 2006-H
         REVOLVING HOME EQUITY LOAN ASSET BACKED NOTES, SERIES 2006-H


         The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an
officer of Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. (the "Master Servicer"), and does
hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.09 of the Sale and Servicing
Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the "Agreement") that:

(i)      A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

(ii)     To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout such calendar year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                              Dated: March 14, 2007
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3281 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mini DVD camcorder with 20G HDD. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 26, 2006 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mini DVD camcorder 

with 20G HDD. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MINI DVD CAMCORDER WITH 20G HDD. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.85.25 Mini-DVD camcorder, full multiformat 

readability with patented laser processor 

technology; 5.0 mega pixel CCD, 20G 

HDD, optical zoom, USB 2.0 PC (provided for in subheading 8525.40.80) ....... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 3281 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Dennis M. HELGUERO, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 05-50399.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth 'Circuit.

July 20, 2006.

Becky S. Walker, Esq., Michael J. Raphael, Esq., USLA — Office of the U.S. At*1001torney, Los Angeles, CA; Todd T. Tristan, Esq., USSA — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Santa Ana, CA, for Plaintiff — Appellee.

H. Dean Steward, Esq., San Clemente, CA, for Defendant — Appellant.

Before: McKEOWN and BERZON, Circuit Judges, and KING,* Senior Judge.

*

 The Honorable Samuel P. King, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The memorandum disposition filed March 17, 2006 is WITHDRAWN. A memorandum disposition is filed concurrently with this order.

The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc and no active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35. The petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc is DENIED. Further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc will be entertained.