alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
729.402-70 Foreign contracts.

(a) The annual Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act

(SFOAA) requires USAID to take certain steps to prevent countries from imposing taxes, including

value added tax (VAT) and customs duties, on U.S. foreign assistance, or if imposed, requires the

countries to reimburse the assessed taxes or duties. The SFOAA also requires certain reporting to

Congress on host country taxation. Because countries imposing such taxes assess them directly on

contractors, USAID requires contractors to report annually on whether taxes have been imposed

and, if so, whether the foreign government reimbursed the taxes.

(b) The contracting officer must insert the clause at § 752.229–71, Reporting of Foreign Taxes, in

solicitations and resulting contracts when:

(1) A contract is fully or partially funded with funds appropriated under titles III through VI of an

SFOAA making appropriations for the Department of State, foreign operations, and related

programs, and

(2) The contract is to be performed wholly or partly in a foreign country.

Parent topic: Subpart 729.4—Contract Clauses
Exhibit 32.1




Certification




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,




As Adopted




Pursuant to Section 906 of the




Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of ChinaNet Online Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           the Report fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By: /s/ Handong Cheng


Name: Handong Cheng


Title:  Chief Executive Officer


June 16, 2014




By:  /s/ Zhige Zhang


Name: Zhige Zhang


Title:  Chief Financial Officer


June 16, 2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                              1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       12
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 1
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             13
<PP&E>                                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               13
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         0
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                   13
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 13
<SALES>                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              0
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               0
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                  0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0
        


</TABLE>
Case 2:06-mj-00079-SRW Document 11 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

VICTOR RENELL BROWN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 187 WAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 8th day of August, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1               
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                        1
<CASH>                                           264,154
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     43,368
<ALLOWANCES>                                      21,684
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 285,838
<PP&E>                                         7,071,166
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,000,523
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5,356,645
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             83,732
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                     5,272,913
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5,356,645
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 856,452
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    445,405
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  69,474
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  514,879
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              514,879
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     514,879
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      32.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      32.60
                                                 
                                               

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 869

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 869 appear at 84 FR 45646, Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 869.11 Lost or destroyed certificates of licensing, authorization or agreements.

AMS will replace lost or destroyed certificates of licensing, certificate of authorization or applicable agreement upon satisfactory proof of loss or destruction. AMS will mark such certificates or agreements as duplicates.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

RALPH WILSON LINGO, #190083, )

)

 Petitioner, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06-CV-703-MHT

)

STATE OF ALABAMA, et al., )

)

 Respondents. )

ORDER ON MOTIONS

On October 23, 2007, the petitioner filed a motion to dismiss sheriff Herbie Johnson

as a respondent (Court Doc. No. 33) and a motion to add warden John Cummins as a

respondent (Court Doc. No. 34). Upon review of these documents, the court construes the

documents as motions to substitute warden John Cummins for sheriff Herbie Johnson as

Cummins is the proper custodial respondent. Upon consideration of the motions to

substitute, and for good cause, it is

ORDERED that these motions be and are hereby GRANTED. It is further

ORDERED that warden John Cummins be substituted for sheriff Herbie Johnson

as a respondent in this cause of action. 

Done this 23rd day of October, 2007.

 /s/ Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY 

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00703-MHT-CSC Document 35 Filed 10/23/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### § 920.3 Person.

*Person* means an individual, partnership, corporation, association or any other business unit.
Subpart 1318.2 - Emergency Acquisition

Flexibilities

Parent topic: PART 1318 - EMERGENCY ACQUISITIONS

1318.201 Contingency operation.

The designee authorized to serve as the Head of the Agency under FAR 18.201(b) and (c) is set forth

in CAM 1301.70.

1318.202 Defense or recovery from certain attacks.

The designee authorized to serve as the Head of the Agency under FAR 18.202(a), (b) and (c) is set

forth in CAM 1301.70.

1318.270 Emergency acquisition flexibilities.

(a) Authorizing emergency acquisition flexibilities. The process for authorizing the use of emergency

procurement flexibilities within the Department of Commerce may vary depending on the nature and

type of the emergency situation. However, generally, if a Senior Bureau Procurement Official (BPO)

determines that emergency acquisition flexibilities are required to meet contracting needs during an

emergency situation, the BPO must obtain the Senior Procurement Executive's concurrence. In the

event that increased warrant authority is needed, the BPO should contact the Senior Procurement

Executive.

(b) Continuity of Operations Plan. Each Contracting Activity shall have an updated Continuity of

Operations Plan, in place designating emergency personnel with warrant levels.

(c) Management controls. Senior BPOs must take affirmative steps to ensure that emergency

flexibilities are used solely for requirements that have a clear and direct relationship to the

emergency situation, and that appropriate management controls are established and maintained to

support the use of the increased thresholds. The Office of Acquisition Management will conduct

periodic reviews of transactions made pursuant to the expanded authorities to evaluate whether the

transactions:

(1) Were in support of the emergency situation;

(2) Were made by an authorized individual;

(3) Were appropriately documented; and

(4) Provided the maximum practicable opportunity for small business participation.
#### § 981.57 Application of salable and reserve percentages after end of crop year.

The salable and reserve percentages established for any crop year shall continue in effect with respect to all almonds for which the reserve obligation has not been previously met, which are received for his own account or handled by any handler after the end of such crop year and before salable and reserve percentages are established for the succeeding crop year. After such percentages are established for the new crop year, the withholding requirements for all such almonds theretofore received for his own account or handled during that crop year shall be adjusted to the newly established percentages.
#### § 920.69 Personal liability.

No member or alternate member of the committee and no employee or agent of the committee shall be held personally responsible, either individually or jointly with others, in any way whatsoever, to any person for errors in judgment, mistakes, or other acts, either of commission or omission, as such member, alternate, employee or agent, except for acts of dishonesty, willful misconduct, or gross negligence.
52.251-1 Government Supply Sources.

As prescribed in 51.107 , insert the following clause:

Government Supply Sources (Apr 2012)

The Contracting Officer may issue the Contractor an authorization to use Government supply

sources in the performance of this contract. Title to all property acquired by the Contractor under

such an authorization shall vest in the Government unless otherwise specified in the contract. The

provisions of the clause at FAR 52.245-1, Government Property, apply to all property acquired under

such authorization

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.251 [Reserved]
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3272 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures of 1,3,5-Triazine-2,4,6-triamine,N,N′′′-[1,2-ethane-diyl-bis [ [ [4,6-bis-[butyl (1,2,2,6,6- 

pentamethyl-4-piperidinyl)amino]-1,3,5-triazine-2-yl] imino]-3,1- 

propanediyl] ] bis[N′,N′′-dibutyl-N′,N′′-bis(1,2,2,6,6-pentamethyl-4- 

piperidinyl)- and Butanedioic acid, dimethylester polymer with 4-hyroxy2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-1-piperdine ethanol. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 26, 2006 

Mr. FRIST (for Mrs. DOLE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures of 1,3,5-Triazine-2,4,6-triamine,N,N′′′-[1,2-ethane-diyl-bis [ [ [4,6- 

bis-[butyl (1,2,2,6,6-pentamethyl-4-piperidinyl)amino]- 

1,3,5-triazine-2-yl] imino]-3,1-propanediyl] ] bis[N′,N′′- 

dibutyl-N′,N′′-bis(1,2,2,6,6-pentamethyl-4-piperidinyl)- 

and Butanedioic acid, dimethylester polymer with 4- 

hyroxy-2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-1-piperdine ethanol. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


wwhite on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
2 

•S 3272 IS 

1 SECTION 1. MIXTURES OF 1,3,5-TRIAZINE-2,4,6-TRI2 AMINE,N,N′′′-[1,2-ETHANE-DIYL-BIS [ [ [4,6-BIS3 [BUTYL (1,2,2,6,6-PENTAMETHYL-4- 

4 PIPERIDINYL)AMINO]-1,3,5-TRIAZINE-2-YL] 

5 IMINO]-3,1-PROPANEDIYL] ] BIS[N′,N′′- 

6 DIBUTYL-N′,N′′-BIS(1,2,2,6,6-PENTAMETHYL-4- 

7 PIPERIDINYL)- AND BUTANEDIOIC ACID, 

8 DIMETHYLESTER POLYMER WITH 4-HYROXY9 2,2,6,6-TETRAMETHYL-1-PIPERDINE ETHANOL. 

10 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

11 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

12 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

13 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.05.52 1,3,5-Triazine-2,4,6-triamine,N,N′′′-[1,2-ethanediylbis [ [ [4,6-bis-[butyl 

(1,2,2,6,6-pentamethyl-4- 

piperidinyl)amino]-1,3,5-triazine-2-yl] imino]-3,1- 

propanediyl] ] bis[N′,N′′- 

dibutyl-N′,N′′-bis(1,2,2,6,6- 

pentamethyl-4-piperidinyl)- 

(CAS No. 106990–43–6) 

and Butanedioic acid, 

dimethylester polymer with 

4-hyroxy-2,2,6,6- 

tetramethyl-1-piperdine ethanol (CAS No. 65447–77–0) 

(provided for in subheading 

3812.30.90) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

15 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

16 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

17 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwhite on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
Definitions.    “Acquisition Category” or ACAT is a defense acquisition program designation. For the purposes of NMCARS, this designation also includes “Business System Category” (BCAT) as defined in DoD Instruction 5000.75.       “ASN(RDA) Website” is defined as https://www.secnav.navy.mil/rda/DASN-P and all accompanying pages within the site where DON contracting policy is posted.       “Clause” is defined as language which imposes a duty on the Government or contractor and is not directly related to the production or performance of a contract deliverable as depicted in Figure 1, Contract Language Criteria.                     “CCO" is the “Chief of the Contracting Office”. The CCO is the official who has overall responsibility for managing the day-to-day contracting office operations and includes the principal deputy to such official.       “DASN(P)” is the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Procurement, Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Research, Development, and Acquisition). It also includes the Executive Director, DASN(P), and the Navy Senior Services Manager (SSM).       “Deputy/Assistant Commander for Contracts” is the Deputy or Assistant Commander for Contracts or the equivalent at a Systems Command, the Headquarters, NAVFACENGCOM; Deputy Commandant for HQMC, I&L; ONR; MSC; and SSP. It also includes the principal deputy for these officials.       “NAE” is the Navy Acquisition Executive. ASN(RDA) is the NAE.       “Navy” or "DON" is the Department of Navy including the Marine Corps, unless otherwise specified.       “NSPE” is Navy Senior Procurement Executive. ASN(RDA) is the NSPE.       “Provision” is defined as language necessary for a potential offeror to produce a conforming proposal in response to a solicitation. **Parent topic:** Subpart 5202.1 - DEFINITIONS
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Viking Minerals Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles Irizarry,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
5th day of October, 2010.


/s/ Charles Irizarry
----------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3156 

To suspend temporarily the duty on N6-Benzyladenine. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. OBAMA introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on N6-Benzyladenine. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON N6-BENZYLADENINE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.29.32 N-(phenylmethyl)-1H-purine-6-amine 

(CAS No. 1214–39–7) (provided for in 

subheading 2933.59.15) .......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•S 3156 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Logan County BancShares,Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that theCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 
| Date:  August 18, 2004 | /s/  Eddie Canterbury |                     |
|-----------------------------|-----------------------|--------------------------|
|                        | Name:                 | Eddie  Canterbury        |
|                        | Title:                | Chief  Executive Officer |
|                             |                       |                          |  |

 

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>     0000761895
<NAME>     StarTronix International Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>     1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      100498
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                 123837
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            262276
<PP&E>                                      244424
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              829139
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      2104746
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                    650
<COMMON>                                     25628
<OTHER-SE>                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                829139
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               732581
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (732581)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             (19000)
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (713581)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0


</TABLE>
1 The parties request to move the pretrial hearing as denied as it would provide

insufficient time for the parties to comply with the deadlines to be set out in the pretrial order.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

NICHOLAS STRICKLAND, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) Case No. 1:06-cv-682-TFM

)

CHAMPION HOME BUILDERS CO., INC. )

 )

Defendant. )

ORDER

Pending before the Court are Defendant’s Motion to Strike Plaintiffs’ Second

Amended Exhibit List (Doc. 55, filed December 13, 2007) and the joint Motion to Amend

Scheduling Order (Doc. 56, filed December 19, 2007). For good cause, it is ORDERED by

this Court as follows:

(1) The Motion to Amend Scheduling Order (Doc. 56) is GRANTED in part and

DENIED in part.

1

 An Amended Scheduling Order shall be issued forthwith.

(2) The Motion to Strike Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Exhibit List (Doc. 55) is

DENIED as moot.

(3) As shown above, the style of the case shall now read that the sole remaining

defendant is Champion Home Builders Co., Inc. 

Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 57 Filed 12/20/2007 Page 1 of 2
DONE this 20th day of December, 2007.

/s/Terry F. Moorer

TERRY F. MOORER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 57 Filed 12/20/2007 Page 2 of 2