alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<PERIOD-TYPE> 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                               MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                    DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                                              134,703
<SECURITIES>                                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                     1,255,895
<ALLOWANCES>                                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                          0<F1>
<PP&E>                                                                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                    6,122,430
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                             3,821,001<F1>
<BONDS>                                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                          2,864,795
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                             4,248,000
<PREFERRED>                                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                                                0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                      6,122,430
<SALES>                                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                 19,994,075
<CGS>                                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    21,267,820
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                  1,518,710
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  (2,792,455)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        949,435
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              (1,843,020)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     (2,137,725)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                         (1.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                         (1.38)
<FN>
<F1> Unclassified balance sheet
</FN>

</TABLE>
#### § 925.67 Derogation.

Nothing contained in this part is, or shall be construed to be, in derogation or in modification of the rights of the Secretary or of the United States: (a) To exercise any powers granted by the act or otherwise; or (b) in accordance with such powers, to act in the premises whenever such action is deemed advisable.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Video Display Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this quarterly report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in
the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during
the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the
registrants internal controls over
financial reporting.
 Date: January 12, 2007
    
    /s/ Michael D. BoydMichael D. BoydChief Financial Officer
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CR. NO. 2:06mj76-SRW

)

EUGENE L. CLECKLER )

KIM CLECKLER )

ORDER

On August 8, 2006, defendants waived their preliminary hearing in this case. Based

on this waiver and on the complaint filed in this matter, the Magistrate Judge finds that there

is probable cause to bind the defendants over to the District Court for further proceedings.

DONE, this 10th day of August, 2006.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 2:06-mj-00076-SRW Document 13 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 1 of 1
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Osage Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, we, Mark S. White, Chief Executive Officer, and Sue Allen Smith, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| /s/ Mark S. White       |   | /s/ Sue Allen Smith     |
|-------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
| Mark S. White           |   | Sue Allen Smith         |
| Chief Executive Officer |   | Chief Financial Officer |
|                    |   |                    |

 

| Date: | September 26, 2008 |
|-------|--------------------|
5233.9002 Contractor appeals to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA).    (a) *General*. The DON Office of the General Counsel (OGC) has sole litigation authority for all appeals under DON contracts to the ASBCA. Because of the frequent complexity of these cases, the DON OGC and the contracting activity involved should maintain the continuity of any DON claim team that might have investigated and evaluated the contractor's claim submission. Such teams should continue to function in an assisting capacity under the leadership of the DON OGC Trial Attorney assigned to handle the appeal.       (b) *Litigation report requirement*. With the compilation of ASBCA Rule 4 documents (available at https://www.asbca.mil/Rules/rules.html), a comprehensive litigation report shall be forwarded to the Litigation Division. The report should include:       (1) A detailed narrative statement of facts, preferably in chronological sequence, and with a topical segregation when appropriate, with references to attached supporting documents of expected testimony. If such a statement was previously submitted, it need not be submitted a second time, but should be supplemented or revised if additional information becomes available in the interim.       (2) An analysis and evaluation (classified as attorney-client privileged information) of the factual and legal positions of both sides (including affirmative defenses and counterclaims available to the Government), the available evidence, and the expertise and effectiveness of prospective witnesses.       (3) The advisory report, if any, of the reviewing official or board.       (c) *Settlement negotiations pending appeal*. The conduct of settlement negotiations in connection with any pending appeal should generally be accomplished by a selected team consisting of the trial attorney and representatives of the contracting officer (including contracting activity technical personnel, counsel, negotiator, and auditor if necessary). Other arrangements may be made in specific cases as appropriate. However, no final settlement agreement will be made without the written approval of the contracting officer. When a settlement is made, a memorandum shall be prepared by the negotiating team (and signed by all team members) stating the basis and reasons. The settlement agreement shall be drafted by the contracting activity and trial attorney. The trial attorney shall file any legal papers required to be filed with the ASBCA to effect disposition of the case by mutual agreement of the parties.       (d) *Review and approval*. Negotiated settlements of appeals pending before the ASBCA, as well as negotiated settlements of appeal issues that have been remanded to the DON for quantum determination, will be subject to review and approval at levels established for claims of the same dollar amount.       (e) *Contract modification*. Whenever contract modification and other contract documents are required to implement a settlement of ASBCA or appellate court decision, they should reference the ASBCA proceedings by title and docket number. **Parent topic:** Subpart 5233.90 - PROCEDURES
#### In the Matter of Gustave F. Wiegmann, Respondent, v. Vincent L. Broderick, as Commissioner of the Police Department of the City of New York, Appellant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated

May 25, 1966, affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. No opinion. Ughetta, Brennan, Hopkins and Benjamín, JJ., concur; Beldoek, P. J., dissents and votes to reverse the judgment, to dismiss the proceeding and to confirm the determination of the Police Commissioner, with the following memorandum: Petitioner pleaded guilty to the Police Departmental charges of (1) failing to properly handle and safeguard his service revolver in that he discharged one shot therefrom causing the death of a civilian and (2) failing and neglecting to be equipped with a regulation holster. Although the actual firing of the revolver, as found by the Police Commissioner, was accidental, nevertheless such firing was the direct result and consequence of petitioner’s flagrant and willful disregard of the Police Department’s safety rules. Moreover, the fact that the fatal bullet struck the victim, an innocent bystander, *over the eye,*as contrasted with a wound or injury inflicted upon the lower part of the victim’s body, which would perhaps have been more usual if the revolver had been fired as it was being removed from the holster, lends support to the view that petitioner was guilty of such negligence and gross carelessness in the handling of a dangerous weapon as to warrant the degree of punishment herein imposed by the Police Commissioner. In my opinion, the dismissal of petitioner was within the scope of justifiable discipline. A police officer occupies a position of greatest sensitivity and he must be subject to rigorous discipline in order that the safety of the community be properly maintained. In the interests of protecting the public, disciplinary measures which might appear unduly harsh in the case of other civil servants may properly be upheld in eases involving police officers. Thus, the views have been expressed that the “ government of a police force assimilates to that required in the control of a military body ” *(People ex rel. Masterson*v. *French,*110 N. Y. 494, 499) and that the “ Commissioner is responsible for the discipline of his force ” *(People ex rel. Guiney*v. *Valentine,*274 N. Y. 331, 333). In this case, the measure of punishment imposed upon petitioner, in the interests of maintaining proper discipline within the force and in protecting the safety and welfare of the community in general, was not “so disproportionate to the offense, in the light of all the circumstances, as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness” *(Matter of Stolz*v. *Board of Regents,*4 A D 2d 361, 364). The court should be most reluctant to interfere with the considered determination of the Police Commissioner that the dismissal of petitioner was the proper measure of punishment merited by his conduct.
Subpart 1408.1 - Excess Personal Property

Parent topic: PART 1408 - REQUIRED SOURCES OF SUPPLIES AND SERVICES

1408.102 Policy.

Inquiries on available excess or surplus personal property should be directed to the PMO or the

designee in each Bureau or Office.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3450 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3450

     To suspend temporarily the duty on Oxirane, 2,2'-[(3,3',5,5'-
   tetramethyl[1,1'-biphenyl]-4,4'-diyl)bis(oxymethylene)]bis- (9Cl).

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 6, 2006

   Mr. Reid introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the duty on Oxirane, 2,2'-[(3,3',5,5'-
   tetramethyl[1,1'-biphenyl]-4,4'-diyl)bis(oxymethylene)]bis- (9Cl).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OXIRANE, 2,2'-[(3,3',5,5'-TETRAMETHYL[1,1'-BIPHENYL]-4,4'-
              DIYL)BIS(OXYMETHYLENE)]BIS- (9CL).

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.29.12        Oxirane, 2,2-[(3,3,5,5- Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           tetramethyl[1,1-                                                  31/2009          ''
                           biphenyl]-4,4-                                                                      .
                           diyl)bis(oxymethylene
                           )]bis- (9Cl) (CAS No.
                           85954-11-6) (provided
                           for in subheading
                           2902.90.90)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# SUBCHAPTER A—GENERAL   

- PART 700 [RESERVED] 
- PART 701—FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION SYSTEM 
- PART 702—DEFINITIONS OF WORDS AND TERMS 
- PART 703—IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST 
- PART 704—ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS 

- PART 700 [RESERVED]   
- PART 701—FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION SYSTEM    - Subpart 701.1—Purpose, Authority, Issuance     - 701.106   OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act.
  - Subpart 701.3—U.S. Agency for International Development Acquisition Regulation     - 701.301   Policy.
    - 701.303   Publication and codification.
  - Subpart 701.4—Deviations from the FAR or AIDAR     - 701.402   Policy.
    - 701.470   Procedure.
  - Subpart 701.6—Career Development, Contracting Authority, and Responsibilities     - 701.601   General.
    - 701.602-1   Authority of contracting officers in resolving audit recommendations.
    - 701.602-3   Ratification of unauthorized commitments.
    - 701.603   Selection, appointment, and termination of appointment of contracting officers.
    - 701.603-70   Designation of contracting officers.
  - Subpart 701.7—Determinations and Findings     - 701.704   Content.
    - 701.707   Signatory authority.
- PART 702—DEFINITIONS OF WORDS AND TERMS    - Subpart 702.170—Definitions     - 702.170-1   Definitions.
  - Subpart 702.270—Definitions Clause     - 702.270-1   Definitions clause.
- PART 703—IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST    - Subpart 703.1—Safeguards     - 703.104-4   Disclosure, protection, and marking of contractor bid or proposal information and source selection information.
    - 703.104-7   Violations or possible violations.
- PART 704—ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS      - Subpart 704.4—Safeguarding Classified Information Within Industry     - 704.404   Contract clauses.
  - Subpart 704.5 xxx     -
  - Subpart 704.8—Contract Files [Reserved]
  - Subpart 704.21 xxx     -
  - Subpart 704.70—Partner Vetting     - 704.7001   Scope of subpart.
    - 704.7002   Definitions.
    - 704.7003   Policy.
    - 704.7004   Procedures.
    - 704.7004-1   Preaward requirements.
    - 704.7004-2   Post award requirements.
    - 704.7004-3   Subcontracts.
    - 704.7005   Solicitation provision and contract clause.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6644

TIMOTHY CLARIDY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. 

(1:11-cv-01620-RDB)

Submitted: July 19, 2012 Decided: July 26, 2012

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy Claridy, Appellant Pro Se. Philip S. Jackson, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Claridy appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing as moot his motion for the return of property. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Claridy v. United States, No. 1:11-cv-01620-RDB (D. Md. 

Mar. 28, 2012). We further grant Claridy’s motion to file 

exhibits to his informal brief. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

ELIZABETH LYNNE HUTCHINSON, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO:

vs. ) CV-06-00700-WHA

) JURY DEMAND

)

PHENIX CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION,)

LARRY E. DICHIARA, officially as )

as Superintendent of the Phenix City Schools)

)

)

Defendants. )

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

COMES NOW, Joshua D. Wilson of the law firm of Wiggins, Childs,

Quinn & Pantazis, LLC, and requests this Honorable Court to enter an appearance as

attorney of record on behalf of Plaintiff in the above-styled action.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,

/s/ Joshua D. Wilson

Joshua D. Wilson

Rocco Calamusa, Jr.

Counsel for the Plaintiff

Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 22 Filed 03/06/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

OF COUNSEL:

WIGGINS, CHILDS, QUINN & PANTAZIS, LLC

The Kress Building

301 19

th Street North

Birmingham, Alabama 35203

205/314-0500

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on March 6

th

, 2006,I electronically filed the foregoing with

theClerk oftheCourt using theCM/ECF system, which willsend notification ofsuch

filing to the following:

Sidney S. Smith

Smith & Smith, PC

1503 Broad Street

Phenix City, AL 36867

/s/ Joshua D. Wilson

Of Counsel

Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 22 Filed 03/06/2007 Page 2 of 2
Jump to main content.

Pesticides: Reregistration

    - You are here:  EPA Home
    - Pesticides
    - Regulating Pesticides
    - Reregistration
    - Pesticide Reregistration Status

----

# Pesticide Reregistration Status 

##### Reregistration Status

      - All Chemicals
      - Carbamates
      - Chloroacetanilides
      - Organophosphates
      - Triazines
      - Definitions : REDS, IREDs, TREDs 

The table below shows the status of each chemical in the reregistration review process, and provides links to a chemical's Web page and any decision documents or fact sheets that are available.  Information that may be available on a chemical Web page include the Chemical Review Manager contact information, Docket ID number, decision and fact sheet documents, Federal Register notices, and related documents.

Documents related to EPA's reregistration review of these pesticides may be found at Regulations.gov in the docket identified for each chemical indicated.

You will need the free Adobe Reader to view files on this page, and for documents provided within the chemical Web pages. See EPA's PDF page to learn more. 
| **  A        B        C  D        E  F        G  H        I  J  K  L        M  N        O  P  Q    R  S  T  U  V  W  X Y  Z ** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| **  A        B        C  D        E  F        G  H        I  J  K  L        M  N        O  P  Q    R  S  T  U  V  W  X Y  Z ** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Publications | Glossary | A-Z     Index | Jobs

----

### Local Navigation

    - Pesticides Home
    - Regulating Pesticides Home 
    - Reregistration Home
    - About Reregistration
    - Product Reregistration
    - Public Participation 
    - Reregistration Status
    - Progress & Status Reports 

----

    - EPA Home
    - Privacy and Security Notice
    - Contact Us

Jump to main content.