alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Mail EnvelopeProperties (4628FO1 C.l12 : 4 : 12192)
Subject: Creation Date: From:

Created By:

Recipients Baltimorel Cecil County 8hrOzone State Implementation Plans 4/20/07 12:53PM Brian Hug

bhug@mde.state.md.us

FIELD

_OFFICES_PO.FIELD _OFFICES AA Co EnvHealth Director (Anne Arundel C AL Co Env Health Director (Allegany Count BA Co Env Health Director (Baltimore Coun BACo Env Health Director2 (Baltimore Cou BACty Env Health Director (Baltimore Cit CA Co Env Health Director (Calvert County CE CoEnv Health Director (Cecil County E CH Co Env Health Director (Charles County CL Co Env Health Director (Carroll County CO Co EnvHealthDirector (Caroline Count DO Co Env Health Director (Dorchester Cou FR CoEnvHealth Director (Frederick Coun GA Co EnvHealthDirector (Garrett County HA Co Env Health Director (Harford County HO Co Env Health Director (Howard County KE Co Env Health Director (Kent CountyEn MO Co Env Health Director (Montgomery Cou MO Co Env Protection (Montgomery County E MO Co Permits and Wells (Montgomery Count PG Co Env Health Director (Prince Georges QA CO Env Health Director (QueenAnnes Co SM Co Env Health Director (StMarys Count SO Co Env Health Director (Somerset Count TACo Env Health Director (Talbot County W A Co Env Health Director (Washington Cou WI Co Env Health Director (Wicomico Count WO Co Env Health Director (Worcester Coun

mde.state.md.us

MDEP02.MDEDOM

aheltibridle CC (AndrewHeltibridle) bhug CC (Brian Hug) dfranks CC (Diane Franks) drabin CC (Debbie Rabin) jwilkinson CC (Jim Wilkinson)

### rcarroll CC (Randall Carroll) rmosier CC (Randy Mosier) rthunell CC (Roger Thunell)

Post Office 

### FIELD OFFICES PO.FIELD OFFICES



### - - 

### - MDEP02.MDEDOM

Files 

### MESSAGE Cecil Hearing.DOC BaItHearing.DOC
Options Expiration Date: Priority: Reply Requested: Return Notification:

Concealed SUbject: Security: Size 

### 7462 26112 26112

None Standard No None

No Standard Route



### mde.state.md.us

Date & Time 04120/07 

### 12:53PM 04118/07

### 03:36PM 04118/07

### 03:36PM
2919.812 Contract administration.       (a) Contracting officers, or designees, must conduct periodic evaluations of the performance of an 8(a) contract at various stages of the contract period of performance. Any problems encountered during the performance evaluation, which cannot be resolved, must be referred to the Office of Small Business Programs for subsequent review and discussion with the appropriate SBA official.          (b) The Office of Small Business Programs and the SBA should be notified at least 45 days before initiating final action to terminate an 8(a) contract.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2919.8 - Contracting with the Small Business Administration (The 8(a) Program)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN INSURANCE

COMPANY,

 Plaintiff,

v.

CAROL THORN, JOLEEN LEEA COLON;

DALE EUGENE KIRKINDOLL; ELIZABETH

S. KIRKINDOLL; THOMAS HOLT

KIRKINDOLL; JAMES W. GRIFFIN;

SANDRA L. GRIFFIN; PATRICK A. BELT;

CHRISTOPHER B. BELT; GENE

STEGMAIER; ESTATE OF WILLIAM R

KLAUSS, a deceased minor, LV STABLE

MEMORIAL HOSPITAL; DRPT. LAKE

REHABILITATION CENTER; BUTLER

COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL

SERVICES.

 Defendants.

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

CIVIL ACTION NUMBER: 

2:06CV717ID

DEFENDANT’S DALE KIRKINDOLL, ELIZABETH KIRKINDOLL, HOLT

KIRKINDOLL’S RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DEFENDANTS, DALE KIRKINDOLL, ELIZABETH KIRKINDOLL, 

AND THOMAS HOLT KIRKINDOLL’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

COME NOW the above referenced Defendants and moves the Court for summary

judgment on their behalf on the following grounds:

1. Each of the Defendants were injured in the automobile accident forming the basis

of Plaintiff’s Interpleader;

2. Plaintiff has tendered $100,000.00 into Court to be paid to the covered persons;

3. No other Defendants named have appeared claiming the monies;

Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 90 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 1 of 3
4. The above referenced Defendants are entitled to the full policy limits in the

amount of $50,000.00 per person/$100,000.00 per accident;

5. As a matter of law Defendant Dale Kirkindoll is entitled to $50,000.00;

6. As a matter of law Defendant Elizabeth Kirkindoll is entitled to $20,000.00;

7. As a matter of law Defendant Holt Kirkindoll is entitled to $30,000.00. 

8. As further grounds for this motion the Kirkindoll defendants hereby incorporate

their original Motion for Summary Judgment (document 27) and their reply to

opposition of said motion (document 37). Plaintiff’s incorporate said documents

as fully set forth herein.

Based upon the foregoing, Defendants move this Court to enter Summary Judgment in

their favor.

Respectfully submitted,

JACKSON, FOSTER & GRAHAM, LLC

Post Office Box 2225

Mobile, AL 36652

251-433-6699

251-433-6127

BY: /s/ MATHEW B. RICHARDSON 

 SIDNEY W. JACKSON, III(JAC024)

 MATHEW B. RICHARDSON (RIC050)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have on this day 3rd of April, 2007, served a copy of the foregoing

pleading with te Clerk of the Court using the CM/CEF system which will send notification of

Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 90 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 2 of 3
such filing to the following:

R. Larry Bradford, Esq.

BRADFORD & SEARS

2020 Canyon Road

Birmingham, AL 35216

Ronald G. Davenport, Esq.

P.O. Box 270

Montgomery, Al 36101

Edgar M. Elliot, IV, Esq.

Greer B. Mallette, Esq.

505 N. 20th St.

Suite 1800

Birmingham, Al 35203

Jimmie R. Ippolito, Jr., Esq.

1409 Coliseum Blvd.

Montgomery, Al 36130

/s/ MATHEW B. RICHARDSON 

JACKSON, FOSTER & GRAHAM, LLC

Post Office Box 2225

Mobile, AL 36652

251-433-6699

251-433-6127

Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 90 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 3 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

RICHARD MARSHALL, *

*

Plaintiff, *

*

v. * Civil Case No. 2:06-cv-701-ID-CSC

*

CHRIS WEST, in his individual capacity, *

LASHUN HUTSON, in his individual capacity *

*

Defendants.

MOTION TO WITHDRAW

COMES NOW Fred Clements, co-counsel for Plaintiff, to respectfully request that the

Court allow him to withdraw from this case and would show unto the Court as follows:

1. As of August 29, 2008, Fred Clements will no longer be associated with the Law Offices

of Jay Lewis, LLC.

2. Plaintiff will not be prejudiced or placed in a hardship upon the granting of said motion.

3. Attorney Jay Lewis of the Law Offices of Jay Lewis, LLC, will continue as counsel for

Plaintiffs. 

WHEREFORE THESE PREMISES CONSIDERED, the undersigned co-counsel for

Plaintiffs prays that this Court will grant his motion to withdraw from the case.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED on this the 22nd day of August, 2008.

/s/ FRED CLEMENTS 

Fred Clements

Law Offices of Jay Lewis, LLC

P.O. Box 5059

Montgomery, AL 36103

(334) 263-7733 (Voice)

(334) 832-4390 (Fax)

Case 2:06-cv-00701-ID-CSC Document 53 Filed 08/22/2008 Page 1 of 2
FredClements@JayLewisLaw.com

ASB-5682-R39C

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 22, 2008, I electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court

the foregoing document through the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing

to the following individuals:

Gary Willford Rick Howard

Daryl Masters Alex Holtsford

Webb & Eley April McKay

P.O. Box 240909 Nix Holtsford Gilliland Higgins & Hitson

Montgomery, AL 36124 P.O. Box 4128

Montgomery, AL 36103-4128

 

/s/ FRED CLEMENTS 

Fred Clements

Law Offices of Jay Lewis, LLC

P.O. Box 5059

Montgomery, AL 36103

(334) 263-7733 (Voice)

(334) 832-4390 (Fax)

FredClements@JayLewisLaw.com

ASB-5682-R39C

Case 2:06-cv-00701-ID-CSC Document 53 Filed 08/22/2008 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00703-MHT-CSC Document 16 Filed 10/17/2006 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:06-cv-00703-MHT-CSC Document 16 Filed 10/17/2006 Page 2 of 7
Case 1:06-cv-00703-MHT-CSC Document 16 Filed 10/17/2006 Page 3 of 7
Case 1:06-cv-00703-MHT-CSC Document 16 Filed 10/17/2006 Page 4 of 7
Case 1:06-cv-00703-MHT-CSC Document 16 Filed 10/17/2006 Page 5 of 7
Case 1:06-cv-00703-MHT-CSC Document 16 Filed 10/17/2006 Page 6 of 7
Case 1:06-cv-00703-MHT-CSC Document 16 Filed 10/17/2006 Page 7 of 7
# National Archives andRecords Administration Office oftheFederal Register 

# FEBI 

# :I2007
Ms. Nancy Molitor Regulations Division (AGe-200) Office ofthe Chief Counsel Federal Aviation Administrat-ion;"DOT 800 Independence Avenue, SW Washmgton, DC 20591 Dear Ms. Molitor: The materiailistcd inthe attachment isapproved for incorporation by reference in 14CFR Part 39. This approval iscontingent upon the final rule containing any language changes, which were agreed upon by our staffs. The approval to incorporate by reference this publication(s) iseffective on the effective dale ofyour finalrule. Ifyou wish to enforce some other edition ofthe publication(s) approved, you must: 1. Publish notice ofthe change inthe Federal Register, and amend the Code ofFederal Regulations; and 2. Ensure that acopy ofthat edition is on file atthe Office ofthe Federal Register; and 3. Notify me inwriting orthe change. Smcerely,
R MOND A. MOSLEY Director ofthe Federal Register Federal Register Attorney: ~ 

### Attachment

.' , u.s. mail address: 1'1601 Adelphi Road, College Park, MD 20740-6001 Office location: 800North Capitol StrC!et, NW, SuHe700,Washington, DC 20002-4244 Federal Regislcr wC!b

sites: h~tp://www.archives.gov/fc!dcral-registerandhttp:/ / WWW.gpo.1CCCSs.gov/naralttcorporatioll by Reference

Docket No. FAA-2006-24036; Directorate IdeJltifier 2006-NE-04-AD: AmdI. 39-14947: AD 2007-04-15
Sicma Aero Seat Service Bulletin No. 90- Issue 2 25-005 and Annex 1, Issue 1 dated March 31, 1999 dated March 31,1999 Docket No. FAA-2006-25470; Directorate Idenlifier 2006-NM-090-AD; Amdt. 39-14942; AD 2007-04-10 Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-25A3353 dated December 9. 2004 Docket No. FAA-2006-25637; Directorate Identifier 2006-CE-43-AD; Amdt. 39-14939; AD 2007-04-08
EADS SOCATA TBM Aircraft Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 70-131, ATANo.53 dated July 2005 DockefNo. F

AA-2006-25892; Directorate ldelltifier 2006-NM-120-AD; Amdt. 39-/4941; AD 2007-04-09
EMBRAER EMBRAER Service Bulletin 145-30- Revision 2 0043 Service Bulletin 145LEG-3Q-0013 dated May 25. 2006 dated June 28, 2005 Docket No. FAA-2006-25926; Directorate IdeJltifier 2000-CE-17-AD; Amdt. 39-14946: AD 2003-17-05 Rl
Shorts Service Bulletln No. 51- Revision NO.8 51 dated July 5, 2006 Docket No. FAA-2006-26235, Directorate idel/tifier 2006-CE-65-AD; AlIIdt. 39-14945,- AD 2()()7-04-13
EADS SaGATA TBM Aircraft Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 70-130, ATA No. 32 dated January 2006 Docket No. FAA-l007-27 J74: Directorate Identifier 2007-CE-006-AD; Amdl. 39-14944; AD 2007-04-12 Gippsland Aeronautics

Prillted 2191100; Mandatory Service Issue 4 Bulletil) SB-GA8-2002- 02 dated January 4. 2007
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectra of 

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were collected using a Bruker Avance 500MHz (11.7T) 

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectrometer with a 5mm Bruker Pabbo probe. was diluted 

approximately 1:10 w/w with CDCL3 containing TMS as the internal standard. Both H and 13C spectra 

were recorded. 

For the proton spectrum, 256 transients, comprised of 65536 time domain points, were summed. A P90 of 

9.00 μs, a dwell time of 48.4 μs and a recycle delay of 2.0 sec were used for the measurement. 

Figure 1 - Proton Spectrum of 

For the carbon spectrum, 8192 transients, comprised of 65536 time domain points, were summed. A P90 

of 7.00 μs, a dwell time of 16.65 μs and a recycle delay of 6.0 sec were used in the measurement. 

Waltz16 was employed for the inverse-gated, proton broadband decoupling to suppress 1

H-13C J-coupling 

during the acquisition period. 

Figure 2 - Carbon Spectrum of 

[ ]

[ ]

[ ]

[ ]

[ ]

[ ]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) 2:06-MJ-0071-DRB

)

RICHARD FERGUSON )

ORDER

Pursuant to defense counsel’s oral notice on July 21, 2006, that the Defendant no

longer desires the preliminary hearing orally requested at his initial appearance, it is

ORDERED that the preliminary hearing scheduled at 10:30 a.m. on July 24, 2006,

is hereby CANCELLED. It is further

ORDERED that the defendant be held in the custody of the U.S. Marshal for

pending his revocation hearing before a United States District Judge on the Petition alleging

violation of supervised release. 

Done this 24 day of July, 2006. th

/s/ Delores R. Boyd

DELORES R. BOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-mj-00071-DRB Document 4 Filed 07/24/2006 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6267

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

LAFAWN DEWAYNE BOBBITT, a/k/a Mandingo, a/k/a Dingo,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., 

District Judge. (3:97-cr-00169-JAG-1; 3:15-cv-00722-JAG)

Submitted: July 21, 2016 Decided: July 22, 2016

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lafawn Dewayne Bobbitt, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Lafawn Dewayne Bobbitt seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B)

(2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Bobbitt has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# Subpart 436.2 - Special Aspects of Contracting for Construction

**Parent topic:**PART 436 - CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS

## 436.201 Evaluation of contractor performance.

*Preparation of performance evaluation reports.* In addition to the requirements of FAR 36.201, performance evaluation reports shall be prepared for indefinite-delivery type contracts when either the contract maximum or the contracting activity's reasonable estimate of services to be ordered exceeds $500,000.00. For these contracts, performance evaluation reports shall be prepared for each order at the time of final acceptance of the work under the order.   

## 436.203 Government estimate of construction costs.

For acquisitions using sealed bid procedures, the contracting officer may disclose the overall amount of the Government's estimate of construction costs following identification of the responsive bid most advantageous to the Government; verification of that bid's price reasonableness; and verification of the bidder's responsibility. For acquisitions using other than sealed bid procedures (e.g., negotiation), the contracting officer may disclose the overall amount of the estimate after contract award.   

## 436.204 Disclosure of the magnitude of construction projects.

In the case of indefinite-delivery type contracts, the reasonable estimate of work to be done or the maximum in the solicitation, both including all options, is to be used to select the price range. Contracting officers may elect to use both a price range for the base period of services and the total, inclusive of options, to best describe the magnitude of the solicitation.   

## 436.205 Statutory cost limitations.

(a) When it appears that funds available for a project may be insufficient for all the desired features of construction, the contracting officer may provide in the solicitation for a base bid item covering the work generally as specified and for one or more additive or deductive bid items which progressively add or omit specified features of the work in a stated order of priority. In this case, the contracting officer shall insert the provision at 452.236-70, Additive or Deductive Items, in solicitations for construction. 

(b) In the alternative to the process in paragraph (a) of this section, the contracting officer may use the policies and procedures found in FAR 17.2.   

## 436.209 Construction contracts with architect-engineer firms.

The head of the contracting activity (HCA) is authorized to approve the award of a contract to construct a project, in whole or in part, to the firm (inclusive of its subsidiaries or affiliates) that designed the project.   

## 436.213 Special procedures for sealed bidding in construction contracting.

## 436.213-2 Presolicitation notices.

The authority to waive a presolicitation notice is restricted to the HCA.
1414.407-4 Mistakes after award.

The CO is authorized to make the administrative determinations outlined in 14.407-4 after receiving

concurrence from the SOL.

Parent topic: Subpart 1414.4 - Opening of Bids and Award of Contract
52.241-4 Change in Class of Service.       As prescribed in 41.501(c)(3), insert a clause substantially the same as the following:          Change in Class of Service (Feb 1995)                                       (a) 						            In the event of a change in the class of service, such service shall be provided at the Contractor’s lowest available rate schedule applicable to the class of service furnished.                                          (b) 						            Where the Contractor does not have on file with the regulatory body approved rate schedules applicable to services provided, no clause in this contract shall preclude the parties from negotiating a rate schedule applicable to the class of service furnished.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.241 Utility Services Provisions and Clauses.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Richard Fonda, Respondent, v Fort Plain Enterprises et al., Appellants. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed January 26, 1979. On April 12, 1971, decedent, while employed at a bowling alley, fell and injured his left shoulder. The record reveals that as a result of this fall claimant developed a persistent lump in the deltoid area; that a biopsy performed on August 24, 1971 revealed liposarcoma of the left shoulder; and that on December 7, 1973, claimant died. According to a report filed by claimant’s attending physician, the cause of death was metastic lesions to the lung. This physician testified that claimant’s accident on April 12,1971 "aggravated and caused this tumor, liposarcoma, to spread locally and eventually spread at a distance from the tumor site origin”. He further testified that claimant’s death was causally related to the accident in that it caused it to spread and to become symptomatic. Another physician testified that the trauma' accelerated the process resulting in claimant’s death. The board found a causal relationship between the accident and the aggravation of claimant’s tumor condition resulting in death. The board affirmed the referee’s decision making a schedule loss award for 100% loss of claimant’s left arm and making an award of death benefits. This appeal ensued. Appellants contend that there is a lack of substantial evidence to support a finding of causal relationship between the accident of April 12, 1971 and the liposarcoma and eventual death. The record reveals, however, that the board was presented with conflicting medical evidence as to causal relationship. Consequently, a question of fact was presented for resolution *697by the board *(Matter of Konieczny v Butterñake Shop,*71 AD2d 718). There is substantial evidence to support the board’s determination and, therefore, it may not be disturbed *(Matter of Axel v Duify-Mott Co.,*47 NY2d 1; *Matter of De Maio v Rockford Plumbing & Heating,*63 AD2d 1041, affd 48 NY2d 665). We also reject appellant’s contention that any claim for death benefits was waived by claimant’s attorney in oral arguments before the board. Section 32 of the Workers’ Compensation Law invalidates any agreement by an employee to waive his right to compensation. The decision of the board must be affirmed. Decision affirmed, with costs to respondents filing briefs. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Kane and Casey, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Patricia Morrison, Appellant.

— Judgment unanimously reversed as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice and a new trial granted. (See *People v Egan,*72 AD2d 239.) (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court— assault, second degree.) Present — Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Callahan, Doerr and Moule, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Carole Yurich, Petitioner, v Blanche Bernstein, as Commissioner of the New York City Department of Social Services et al., Respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, *inter alia,*to review a determination of the respondent State Commissioner of Social Services, *822dated July 27, 1978 and made after a statutory fair hearing, which affirmed a determination of the local agency denying petitioner’s application for a grant of public assistance for moving expenses and a rent security deposit. Petition granted to the extent that the determination is annulled, on the law, without costs or disbursements, it is determined that petitioner is entitled to be reimbursed and the matter is remitted to the State commissioner for a further hearing on the issues of (1) whether petitioner’s claimed expenditures were her true expenses and (2) the proper amount of assistance to be paid to the petitioner. The record in this proceeding is insufficient to permit us to resolve the above issues (see *Matter of Serrano v Shang,*69 AD2d 905). In order to facilitate the hearing to be held, we note that we find no merit in the ground cited by the State commissioner for the affirmance of the local agency’s determination, that petitioner had not met the criteria of 18 NYCRR 352.6 (a) (1) (ii) *(d), (f).*Petitioner clearly moved from a temporary residence to a permanent residence within the meaning of the regulation (18 NYCRR 352.6 [a] [1] [ii] *[d]).*Additionally, the living situation from which she moved was such that remaining there would have adversely affected the mental or physical health of her family (see 18 NYCRR 352.6 [a] [1] [ii] *[f]).*Finally, the State commissioner’s contention that petitioner was not entitled to reimbursement of a personal debt, which was incurred because she had borrowed the necessary funds to move into her new residence, is without merit. The obligation she incurred is still outstanding and should be repaid by funds paid to her by the local agency, which should not be allowed to avoid its responsibility because petitioner was forced into borrowing the necessary funds it refused to supply (see *Matter of Shafran v Smith,*60 AD2d 581; *Matter of Stewart v Smith,*57 AD2d 897; *Matter of Walker v La vine,*83 Mise 2d 863). Mollen, P. J., Gibbons, Martuscello and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
# 5205.404-1 Release procedures.

(a) *Application*. The agency head designates the HCA as the official who may, in addition to the agency head, release long-range acquisition estimates.

**Parent topic:**5205.404 Release of long-range acquisition forecasts.