alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
742.1503 Procedures.

(a) [Reserved]

(b) Personal services contractors shall be recognized as Government personnel for the purposes of

the restriction on access to contractor performance information in (48 CFR) FAR 42.1503.

Parent topic: Subpart 742.15—Contractor Performance Information
EXHIBIT 32  INDIE GROWERS ASSOCIATION   Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   In connection with the accompanying annual report on Form 10-K/A of Indie Growers Association (the Company) for the year ended March 31, 2015 (the Report), I, Robert Coleridge, President and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   August 18, 2015  /s/ Robert ColeridgePresident and Principal Financial Officer
Enclosure 5

SIP completeness checklist
Enclosure 5

COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST FOR SIP REVISION

Progress Report on Implementation of PM2.5 State Implementation Plans (SIPs) for the South 

Coast and San Joaquin Valley Air Basins and Proposed SIP Revisions

Planning Area: South Coast Air Quality Management District and 

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District

Title 40 CFR, Part 51, Appendix V –

Criteria for Determining the Completeness 

of Plan Submissions

Enclosed Notes

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS

2.1(a) Submittal Letter from Governor's 

Designee x See submittal letter.

2.1(b) Evidence of Adoption x

ARB Resolution 11-24 and 

Executive Order S-11-010.

2.1(c) Legal Authority Citation x

ARB Resolution 11-24 and 

Executive Order S-11-010.

2.1(d) Copy of :

a. Attainment Plan

b: Contingency Measures

N/A Not Applicable.

2.1(e) Evidence of Compliance with State's 

Procedural Requirements x

ARB Resolution 11-24 and 

Executive Order S-11-010.

2.1(f) Evidence of Public Notice Consistent with 

40 CFR part 51.102 x

See Public Hearing Notice and 

transcripts of the April 28, 2011 ARB 

Board Hearing.

2.1(g) Certification of Public Hearing in 

Accordance with Notice x ARB Resolution 11-24.

2.1(h) Compilation of Public Comments and 

Responses x

See Public Hearing Notice and 

transcripts of the April 28, 2011 ARB 

Board Hearing.

2.2(a) Identification of Regulated Pollutant N/A Not Applicable.

2.2(b) Identification of Attainment Area/Status N/A Not applicable.

2.2(c) Estimate of Plan's Impact on Emissions x

Appendix C: Reasonable Further 

Progress tables

Appendix D: Transportation Conformity 

Budgets

2.2(d) Demonstration that Plan 

Approval/Implementation Protects 

NAAQS 

x

Appendix B: Rulemaking Calendar

Appendix C: Reasonable Further 

Progress tables

Appendix D: Transportation Conformity 

Budgets

2.2(e) Modeling Support N/A Not Applicable.

2.2(f)- Compliance/Enforcement and 

2.2(i) Justification N/A Not Applicable.
LIST IV - DEFINITIONS OF NEW ENGLAND COUNTY METROPOLITAN AREAS

(NECMAs)

FIPS

Code NECMA Title Level Definition Central Cities

0733 BANGOR, ME C Penobscot County Bangor, ME

0743 BARNSTABLE-YARMOUTH, MA C Barnstable County Barnstable, MA

 Yarmouth, MA

1123 BOSTON-WORCESTER-LAWRENCE- A Bristol County, MA Boston, MA

 LOWELL-BROCKTON, MA-NH Essex County, MA Worcester, MA

 Middlesex County, MA Lowell, MA

 Norfolk County, MA New Bedford, MA

 (Former title: Boston-Lawrence- Plymouth County, MA Manchester, NH

 Salem-Lowell-Brockton, MA; Suffolk County, MA Cambridge, MA

 includes former Manchester- Worcester County, MA Brockton, MA

 Nashua, NH, New Bedford-Fall Hillsborough County, Fall River, MA

 River-Attleboro, MA, Portsmouth- NH Lynn, MA

 Dover-Rochester, NH, and Rockingham County, Nashua, NH

 Worcester-Fitchburg-Leominster, NH Lawrence, MA

 MA NECMAs) Strafford County, NH Waltham, MA

 Fitchburg, MA

 Attleboro, MA

 Leominster, MA

 Gloucester, MA

 Rochester, NH

 Portsmouth, NH

1303 BURLINGTON, VT C Chittenden County Burlington, VT

 Franklin County

 Grand Isle County

3283 HARTFORD, CT A Hartford County Hartford, CT

 (Former title: Hartford-New Middlesex County Middletown, CT

 Britain-Middletown-Bristol, CT) Tolland County
FIPS

Code NECMA Title Level Definition Central Cities

4243 LEWISTON-AUBURN, ME C Androscoggin County Lewiston, ME

 Auburn, ME

5483 NEW HAVEN-BRIDGEPORT-STAMFORD- A Fairfield County Bridgeport, CT

 WATERBURY-DANBURY, CT New Haven County New Haven, CT

 (Former title: New Haven-Waterbury- Waterbury, CT

 Meriden CT; includes former Stamford, CT

 Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk- Norwalk, CT

 Danbury, CT NECMA) Danbury, CT

 Meriden, CT

5523 NEW LONDON-NORWICH, CT B New London County New London, CT

 Norwich, CT

6323 PITTSFIELD, MA C Berkshire County Pittsfield, MA

6403 PORTLAND, ME C Cumberland County Portland, ME

6483 PROVIDENCE-WARWICK- B Bristol County Providence, RI

 PAWTUCKET, RI Kent County Warwick, RI

 (Former title: Providence- Providence County Pawtucket, RI

 Pawtucket-Woonsocket, RI) Washington County Woonsocket, RI

8003 SPRINGFIELD, MA B Hampden County Springfield, MA

 Hampshire County Holyoke, MA

 Westfield, MA

 Northampton, MA
# Subpart 1009.1 - Responsible Prospective Contractors

Source:                                82 FR 53428, Nov. 16, 2017, unless otherwise noted.                               

**Parent topic:**PART 1009 - CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS

## 1009.104 Standards.

## 1009.104-5 Representation and certifications regarding responsibility matters.

(b) Internal Revenue Service (IRS) contracting officers shall comply with the requirements of subpart 1009.70 once an offeror has been identified as the apparent successful offeror.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 9543600

March 6, 2007

Notice of Dismissal of Case

To: All Parties

Re: Georgia Power Company v. Moon 

Civil Action No. 3:06-cv-00698-SRW

 

 Pursuant to the Notice of Dismissal filed by the Plaintiff on March 5, 2007, this case

has been closed and removed from the pending docket of this court.

 

Case 3:06-cv-00698-SRW Document 5 Filed 03/05/2007 Page 1 of 1
# Subpart 441.2 - Acquiring Utility Services

**Parent topic:**PART 441 - ACQUISITION OF UTILITY SERVICES

## 441.201 Policy.

As used in FAR 41.201(d)(2)(i) and 41.201(d)(3) the Federal agency head designee is the head of the contracting activity.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,



As Adopted



Pursuant to Section 906 of the



Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of ChinaNet
Online Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned of the Company,
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)         the
Report fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and



(2)         the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|By:                             | /s/ Handong Cheng | 
|------------------------------- | ----------------- | 
|Name: Handong Cheng             |                  
|Title:  Chief Executive Officer |                  
|February 29, 2012               |                  
|                                |                  
|By:                             | /s/ Zhige Zhang   | 
|Name: Zhige Zhang               |                  
|Title:  Chief Financial Officer |                  
|February 29, 2012               |                  



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and will be furnished
to the SEC or its staff upon request.  This exhibit is not “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 but is instead furnished as provided by applicable rules of the SEC.
§ 987.168 Handler records. Each handler shall establish complete records which accurately show the quantity of dates handled, disposed of, and withheld. These records shall be maintained for at least 2 years after the end of the crop year of record. Records shall show: ( a ) For grower deliveries of dates, the name of each grower, the varieties delivered and the net weight of each variety;
( b ) For shipments of dates, the variety, type of pack, net weight and destination or name and address of the person to whom each shipment was sent;
( c ) If different from shipments, the variety, type of pack, net weight and purchaser of each quantity of dates sold; and
( d ) Manifests, invoices, weight certificates, inventory tabulations, or any other documents necessary to prepare, file, or substantiate the reports required to be filed with the Committee.
[37 FR 23325, Nov. 2, 1972, as amended at 43 FR 28439, June 30, 1978]
#### § 959.110 Reestablishment of districts.

Pursuant to § 959.25, a single district is reestablished to include all counties in the production area as follows: the counties of Aransas, Atascosa, Bee, Brooks, Calhoun, Cameron, DeWitt, Dimmit, Duval, Frio, Goliad, Hidalgo, Jim Hogg, Jim Wells, Karnes, Val Verde, Kenedy, Kinney, Kleberg, La Salle, Live Oak, Maverick, McMullen, Medina, Nueces, Refugio, San Patricio, Starr, Uvalde, Victoria, Webb, Willacy, Wilson, Zavala and Zapata in the State of Texas.

[89 FR 63081, Aug. 2, 2024]
Case 3:06-cv-00713-MHT-SRW Document 34 Filed 10/01/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 3:06-cv-00713-MHT-SRW Document 34-2 Filed 10/01/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 3:06-cv-00713-MHT-SRW Document 34-3 Filed 10/01/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 3:06-cv-00713-MHT-SRW Document 34-4 Filed 10/01/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-00713-MHT-SRW Document 34-4 Filed 10/01/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### A. M. ENGEL & CO., Inc., v. DAVIS.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July 10, 1914.)

Action by A. M. Engel & Co., Incorporated, against Robert L. Davis.

No opinion. Application denied, with $10 costs. Order signed. See, also, 81 Misc. Rep. 202, 142 N. Y. Supp. 469.
*

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not

precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-60748

(Summary Calendar)

SEBASTIAN MELERINE, III,

Petitioner,

versus

ELEVATING BOATS INC; DIRECTOR, 

OFFICE OF WORKER’S COMPENSATION 

PROGRAMS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF

LABOR,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review from the Benefits Board,

United States Department of Labor

November 13, 1997

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Petitioner, Sebastian Melerine, III (“Melerine”) appeals the Benefits Review Board’s order

affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) finding of disability for the limited period ofJune
1

 In the alternative, Melerine argues that the ALJ improperly relied on the opinion of Dr. Richard Warren

Levy, a neurosurgeon, who found the radiographs presented for diagnosis were of such poor quality that a finding of

a herniated disc could not be supported. Thus, Melerine requests that a repeat MRI be authorized to aid in a definitive

diagnosis.

2

16, 1989 through September 29, 1989 against his former employer, Elevating Boats, Inc. Melerine

specifically arguesthat the ALJ’sfinding that his disability ceased on September 29, 1989 is contrary

to the evidence and that he is, in fact, entitled to continuing compensation benefits1and attorney’s

fees. We have reviewed the record and the briefs, and conclude that the ALJ’s findings are supported

by substantial evidence. The judgment of the Benefits Review Board is therefore AFFIRMED.
75 DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES

Unofficial Text (See Printed Volume). Current through date and Register shown on Title Page.

Register, November, 2008, No. 635

Chapter DCF 251

APPENDIX D

CONSUMER PRODUCTS SAFETY COMMISSION (www.cpsc.gov)

Your Used Crib Could Be DEADLY

CPSC Document # 5020

An unsafe used crib could be very dangerous for a baby. Each year, about 50 babies suffocate or strangle when

they become trapped between broken crib parts or in cribs with older, unsafe designs.

A safe crib is the best place to put a baby to sleep. Look for a crib with a certification seal showing that it meets

national safety standards.

If a crib does not meet these guidelines, it may not be used by children enrolled in your child care center. To

protect all children, destroy it and replace it with a safe crib.

A safe crib has:

• No missing, loose, broken, or improperly−installed screws, brackets, or other hardware on the crib or the

mattress support.

• No more than 2 3/8 inches between crib slats so a baby’s body cannot fit through the slats.

• A firm, snug−fitting mattress so a baby cannot get trapped between the mattress and the side of the crib.

• No corner posts over 1/16 of an inch above the end panels (unless they are over 16 inches high for a canopy)

so a baby cannot catch clothing and strangle.

• No cutout areas on the headboard or foot board so a baby’s head cannot get trapped.

• A mattress support that does not easily pull apart from the corner posts so a baby cannot get trapped between

mattress and crib.

• No cracked or peeling paint to prevent lead poisoning.

• No splinters or rough edges.
§ 923.31 Duties. The committee shall have, among others, the following duties: ( a ) To select a chairman and such other officers as may be necessary, and to define the duties of such officers;
( b ) To appoint such employees, agents, and representatives as it may deem necessary, and to determine the compensation and to define the duties of each;
( c ) To submit to the Secretary as soon as practicable after the beginning of each fiscal period a budget for such fiscal period, including a report in explanation of the items appearing therein and a recommendation as to the rate of assessment for such period;
( d ) To keep minutes, books, and records which will reflect all of the acts and transactions of the committee and which shall be subject to examination by the Secretary;
( e ) To prepare periodic statements of the financial operations of the committee and to make copies of each such statement available to growers and handlers for examination at the office of the committee;
( f ) To cause its books to be audited by a competent accountant at least once each fiscal year and at such time as the Secretary may request;
( g ) To act as intermediary between the Secretary and any grower or handler;
( h ) To investigate and assemble data on the growing, handling, and marketing conditions with respect to cherries;
( i ) To submit to the Secretary such available information as he may request;
( j ) To notify producers and handlers of all meetings of the committee to consider recommendations for regulations;
( k ) To give the Secretary the same notice of meetings of the committee as is given to its members;
( l ) To investigate compliance with the provisions of this part;
( m ) With the approval of the Secretary, to redefine the districts into which the production area is divided, and to reapportion the representation of any district on the committee: *Provided,* That any such changes shall reflect, insofar as practicable, shifts in cherry production within the districts and the production area.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of China Industrial Waste Management, Inc. (the “Company”), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1)      The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  May 13, 2011





/s/ Xin GuoName: Xin GuoTitle: Chief Financial Officer(principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)





This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 2:06-cv-00725-MHT-CSC Document 16 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00725-MHT-CSC Document 16 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00725-MHT-CSC Document 16 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 3 of 3
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-23-00054-CR

The State of Texas

v.

Juan Villarreal

On Appeal from the

148th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 18FC-4900E

JUDGMENT

The Court’s judgment issued on May 9, 2024, is hereby withdrawn and the 

following is substituted therefor. 

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause 

remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED 

and REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

May 23, 2024
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****GSAacquisition workforce forum**** 
SuDocNumber:GS1.43:
ItemNumber:0559-J-05(online)
CGPsystem Number:000613182
 
2003
October
 
Winter
2004
Spring
 
Summer
 
Fall
 
Winter
2005
Spring
 
Summer
 
Fall
2006
Spring
 
Summer
 
Fall
 
Winter
2007
Spring
 
Summer
 **
1414.407-4 Mistakes after award.       The CO is authorized to make the administrative determinations outlined in 14.407-4 after receiving concurrence from the SOL.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1414.4 - Opening of Bids and Award of Contract
5132.006 Reduction or suspension of

contract payments upon finding of fraud.

5132.006-1 General.

5132.006-2 Definition.

5132.006-3 Responsibilities.

Parent topic: Part 5132 - Contract Financing
NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1



# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604
Submitted December 1, 201 7

Decided December 4, 2017



### Before

F RANK H. E ASTERBROOK , Circuit Judge

A NN C LAIRE W ILLIAMS , Circuit Judge

G ARY F EINERMAN , District Judge *

No . 15

- 3625

U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee
,

v.

M ICHAEL A NGLIN , Defendant

- Appellant

. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin

.

No. 14

- cr

- 3 C.N. Clevert, Jr.
, Judge

.

On Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States

.

Order

Our opi nion in this appeal, 846 F.3d 95 4 (7th Cir. 2017), remanded for additional proceedings concerning the terms of supervised release but otherwise affirmed the convictions and sentences. The Supreme Court then instructed us to consider the effect of Dean v. United States , 137 S. Ct. 1170 (2017), which held that

* Of the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation.No. 15

- 3625 Page 2

a district court need not disregard the punishment on cou nts with mandatory

minimum sentences when determining the punishment on other counts. Anglin v. United States , No. 16

– 9411 (U.S. Oct. 2, 2017). The parties have filed position statements on remand.

After considering these statements, we remand to the dis trict court with instructions to conduct a full resentencing in light of Dean and all other current law, including this circuit’s rulings (some of which post

- date our original opi nion) on the terms of supervised release. Because the district judge who

sent enced Anglin has retired, it is not possible to ask him whether this circuit’s opinion in United States v. Roberson , 474 F.3d 432 (7th Cir. 2007), which Dean disapproved, affected Anglin’s sentence. And because at least some terms of Anglin’s sentence must be determined by a newly assigned judge, the most sensible approach is to allow that judge to craft a complete sentencing package.

Anglin’s convictions remain valid. The sentences are vacated, and the case is remanded for resentencing.
EX-33 (h)
Securities Servicing
The Bank of New York
101 Barclay Street
New York, NY 10286


(logo) The BANK
of NEW YORK

ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING
CRITERIA


The Bank of New York and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A.(collectively,
the "Company") provides this platform-level assessment of compliance with the
servicing criteria specified in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

Management has determined that the following servicing criteria are applicable
in regards to the following servicing platform for the following period:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential
mortgage-backed securities and other mortgage-related asset-backed securities
issued on or after January 1, 2006 (and like-kind transactions issued prior to
January 1, 2006) for which the Company provides trustee, securities
administration, paying agent or custodial services. The platform includes like
kind transactions for which the Company provided trustee, securities
administrator, paying agent or custodial services as a result of the Company's
acquisition as of October 1, 2006 of portions of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s
corporate trust business, including structured finance agency and trust
transactions.

Applicable Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d),
to the extent required by the related transaction agreements as to any
transaction, except for the following criteria: 1122 (d) (1) (ii), (iii), (iv),
(4) (iv), (v), (vi), (vii), (viii), (ix), (x), (xi), (xii) and (xiii).

Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2006.

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the following
assessment of compliance in respect of the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

* The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria.


1


(page)


* The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

* As of December 31, 2006 and for the Period, the Company was in material
compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.


Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued
an attestation report with respect to the Company's foregoing assessment of
compliance.


The Bank of New York
The Bank of New York Trust
Company, N.A.

/s/ Robert L. Griffin
Robert L. Griffin
Authorized Signer


The Bank of New York
The Bank of New York Trust
Company, N.A.

/s/ Patrick J. Tadie
Patrick J. Tadie
Authorized Signer

March 1, 2007


2