alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION***

 

I, Perry T. Massie, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of OutdoorChannel Holdings, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and otherfinancial information included in this report fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

                (a) Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

                (b) Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

                (c) Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

                (a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

                (b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| Date: August 12, 2005 | /s/ Perry T. Massie                          |   |
|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------|--------|
| ** **            | **Perry T. Massie**, Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

----
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3279 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mini DVD camcorder with 8G HDD. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 26, 2006 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mini DVD camcorder 

with 8G HDD. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MINI DVD CAMCORDER WITH 8G HDD. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.85.25 Mini-DVD camcorder, full multiformat 

readability with patented laser processor 

technology; 1.3 mega pixel CCD, 8G 

HDD, optical zoom, USB 2.0 PC (provided for in subheading 8525.40.80) ....... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 3279 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
```

[107th Congress Public Law 312]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ312.107]

[[Page 116 STAT. 2456]]

Public Law 107-312
107th Congress

                                 An Act

 
          To reduce preexisting PAYGO balances, and for other 
            purposes. <<NOTE: Dec. 2, 2002 -  [H.R. 5708]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 2 USC 902 note.>> REDUCTION OF PREEXISTING PAYGO 
            BALANCES.

    Upon the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Office of 
Management and Budget shall reduce any balances of direct spending and 
receipts legislation for all fiscal years under section 252 of the 
Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 to zero.

    Approved December 2, 2002.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5708:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 148 (2002):
            Nov. 14, considered and passed House.
            Nov. 15, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

*Agency Holding the Meeting:*                     Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.                

# Time and Date: 

11:30 a.m., Monday, February 22, 2010.

# Place: 

Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20551.

# Status: 

Closed.

# Matters to be Considered:

1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve System employees.

2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

# For more information please contact: 

Michelle Smith, Director, or Dave Skidmore, Assistant to the Board, Office of Board Members at 202-452-2955.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at                     *http://www.federalreserve.gov*                     for an electronic announcement that not only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other information about the meeting.                

Dated: February 12, 2010.

Jennifer J. Johnson,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-3134 Filed 2-16-10; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### § 906.33 Budget.

At the beginning of each fiscal period and as may be necessary thereafter, the committee shall prepare an estimated budget of income and expenditures necessary for the administration of this part. The committee shall recommend the rate of assessment calculated to provide adequate funds to defray its proposed expenditures. The committee shall present such budget to the Secretary with an accompanying report showing the basis for its estimates and recommendations.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DEBRA BEYAH, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06cv659-CSC

)

WAL-MART STORES, INC.,, )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

Now pending before the court is the January 15, 2007, motion to amend (doc. # 17)

filed by the plaintiff. The motion is timely and the defendant does not object to the motion

to amend. Accordingly, upon consideration of the motion and for good cause, it is

ORDERED that the motion to amend (doc. # 17) be and is hereby GRANTED.

Done this 16 day of January, 2007. th

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00659-CSC Document 18 Filed 01/16/2007 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

M IDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABA M A

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

December 27, 2006

NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE

To: ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD

Case Style: Brooks et al v. Pactiv Corporation et al

Case Number: 2:06cv680-LES-CSC

Referenced Pleading: Motion to Dismiss ; Brief and Support; and Answer

Docket Entry Number: #11, #12, and #13

The referenced pleadings electronically filed on 12/22/06 were filed in error. These pleadings

should have been filed in the Lead Case: 2:06cv83-LES.

These pleading are hereby STRICKEN from the record and the parties are instructed to

disregard the entry of these pleadings on the court’s docket.

Case 2:06-cv-00680-LES-CSC Document 14 Filed 12/27/2006 Page 1 of 1
|  |  |  |
|--|--|--|
|  |
|  |
|  |

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|

|  |
|--|

|  | **Mathematics and Science Achievement State by State, 1998**
**Download** the entire report in one PDF file or download the individual sections:- Data Highlights  IntroductionU.S. Pages
Appendix A Technical Notes and Sources
- Appendix B NAEP Data Collection Schedules  Appendix C Standard ErrorsAppendix D Statistically Significant Differences in Subgroup Performance on NAEP

[Home][Search][Feedback][Site Overview][About NEGP][Goals][What's New][Data][Publications][News and Events][Links]
**NATIONAL EDUCATION GOALS PANEL****1255 22nd Street, N.W., Suite 502Washington, DC  20037(202) 724-0015 -- (202) 632-0957NEGP@ed.gov** |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### § 966.25 Redistricting.

The committee may recommend, and pursuant thereto, the Secretary may approve, the reapportionment of members among districts, and the reestablishment of districts within the production area. In recommending any such changes, the committee shall give consideration to: (a) Shifts in tomato acreage within districts and within the production area during recent years; (b) the importance of new production in its relation to existing districts; (c) the equitable relationship of committee membership and districts; (d) economies to result for producers in promoting efficient administration due to redistricting or reapportionment of members within districts; and (e) other relevant factors. No change in districting or in apportionment of members within districts may become effective within less than 30 days prior to the date on which terms of office begin each year and no recommendations for such redistricting or reapportionment may be made less than six months prior to such date.
###### Editorial Note on Part 982

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 61 FR 17559, Apr. 22, 1996.

#### § 982.55 Exchange of certified merchantable hazelnuts withheld.

Any handler who has withheld from handling certified merchantable hazelnuts pursuant to the requirements of § 982.50 may exchange therefor an equal quantity, by weight, of other certified merchantable hazelnuts. Any such exchange shall be made under the direction or supervision of the Board.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2708 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2708

    To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide an enrollment 
priority for veterans, who are recipients of certain medals for valor, 
in health care services provided by the Department of Veterans Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 3, 2006

   Mr. Akaka introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide an enrollment 
priority for veterans, who are recipients of certain medals for valor, 
in health care services provided by the Department of Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ENROLLMENT PRIORITY FOR HEALTH CARE BENEFITS OF VETERANS WHO 
              ARE RECIPIENTS OF CERTAIN MEDALS AND AWARDS.

    Section 1705(a) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
striking paragraph (3) and inserting the following new paragraph (3):
            ``(3) Veterans who--
                    ``(A) are former prisoners of war or were awarded 
                the Purple Heart;
                    ``(B) were awarded--
                            ``(i) the medal of honor;
                            ``(ii) the distinguished-service cross, 
                        Navy cross, or Air Force cross;
                            ``(iii) the silver star; or
                            ``(iv) any other medal for valor or heroism 
                        accorded a position in the order of precedence 
                        of awards and decorations authorized to be 
                        awarded to members of the Armed Forces that is 
                        equal to or higher than the order of precedence 
                        accorded to the silver star medal;
                    ``(C) have a service-connected disability rated 10 
                percent or 20 percent; or
                    ``(D) are described in subparagraphs (B) and (C) of 
                section 1710(a)(2) of this title.''.
                                 <all>
```
COURTROOM DEPUTY’S MINUTES MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/INITIAL APPEARANCE DATE: August 9, 2006

 BOND HEARING

 DETENTION HEARING Digital Recording 4:16 - 4:26

 PRELIMINARY (EXAMINATION)(HEARING)

 REMOVAL HEARING (R.40)

 ARRAIGNMENT

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PRESIDING MAG. JUDGE: Susan Russ Walker DEPUTY CLERK: Joyce Taylor

CASE NO. 2:06mj79-SRW DEFENDANT NAME: Alberto Villareal

AUSA: Christopher Snyder DEFT. ATTY: Christine Freeman

Type Counsel: ( )Retained; ( ) CJA; ( ) Waived; ( /) FPD

USPO/USPTS: Ron Thweatt

Interpreter needed: ( / ) NO; ( )YES Name:

____________________________________________________________________________

/ Date of Arrest August 9, 2006 or  Arrest Rule 40

/ Deft First Appearance. Advised of rights/charges.  Prob/Sup Rel Violator

/ Financial Affidavit executed. ORAL MOTION for appointment of Counsel.

/ ORAL ORDER appointing Federal Public Defender - Notice of Appearance to be filed

 Panel Attorney Appointed;  to be appointed - prepare voucher

 Deft. Advises he will retain counsel. Has retained _____________________

  Government’s ORAL Motion for Detention Hrg.  to be followed by written

motion;  Government’s WRITTEN Motion for Detention Hrg. filed

 Detention Hearing  held; set for

 ORDER OF TEMPORARY DETENTION PENDING HEARING to be entered

 ORDER OF DETENTION HEARING PENDING TRIAL to be entered

/ Release order entered. Deft advised of conditions of release

/ / BOND EXECUTED (M/D AL charges) $25,000.00. Deft released

 BOND EXECUTED (R. 40) - deft to report to originating district as ordered

 Bond not executed. Defendant to remain in Marshal’s custody

 Deft. ORDERED REMOVED to originating district

/ Waiver of / preliminary examination  Waiver Rule 40 hearing

 Court finds PROBABLE CAUSE. Defendant bound over to the Grand Jury

 ARRAIGNMENT HELD. Plea of NOT GUILTY entered. Set for

DISCOVERY DISCLOSURE DATE: 

 WAIVER of Speedy Trial. CRIMINAL TERM: 

 NOTICE to retained Criminal Defense Attorney handed to counsel

Case 2:06-mj-00079-SRW Document 12 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 1 of 1
DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY 

BOARD 

May 16, 1997 

A. Explosion at Plutonium Finishing Plant (PFP): On May 14, just before 8 p.m., a chemical feed tank in the 

PFP's Plutonium Reclamation Facility (PRF) exploded. No one was injured nor was there any release of 

radioactive material. Mr. Ogg responded to the DOE Emergency Operations Center (EOC) and continues to 

follow recovery actions. DOE-RL and Babcock and Wilcox Hanford Co. convened an investigation team that 

plans to re-enter the facility this afternoon (May 16). Details are being forwarded to DNFSB-HQ (i.e., Ray 

Daniels) as they become available. Mr. Gubanc is following up with DOE-RL on the delay in notifying the 

DNFSB Site Representatives. (Gubanc was first notified at 3:30 a.m. on May 15). 

B. Investigation of Worker Injuries at Canister Storage Building (CSB): Investigation teams established by 

DOE-RL and Fluor Daniel/Duke continued root cause analyses and interviews related to the construction 

injuries at the CSB last week. Pending conclusion of the contractor investigation (possibly next week), 

construction activities at the CSB remain on hold. 

C. Review of Construction Management: This week, Mr. Gubanc accompanied staff members Arcaro, Barton, 

Blackman and Napolitano in a scoping assessment of construction and configuration management. In general, 

the review corroborated the Site Representatives' assessment documented in our February 24, 1997, report. 

Observations include: 

1. Neither DOE-RL nor Fluor Daniel Hanford (FDH) possess an engineering organization (e.g., civil, 

mechanical, electrical) to assist in the technical review of construction design documents. As a result, 

DOE and FDH approvals of Functional Design Criteria and Final Acceptance are based on whether 

certain activities were completed (e.g., were design codes specified) but not necessarily the quality or 

adequacy of those activities (e.g., were the appropriate design codes specified). 

2. FDH responses to three separate DOE-RL requests for action have been neither timely nor complete. 

Additionally, despite having recognized these concerns, DOE-RL has demanded no compensatory 

measures in the interim. The specific issues concern inspection independence, work completion 

verification and the dedication of commercial- grade items for nuclear applications. 

3. FDH and Fluor Daniel Northwest (FDNW) both report to the same Fluor Daniel corporate vice president. 

Each of FDH's major subcontractors (Duke, Rust, etc.) are required to utilize the architect 

engineer/construction management (AE/CM) services of FDNW unless specifically approved otherwise 

by FDH. This arrangement places unique influences on both FDH and the subcontractors. 

cc: Board Members 

TO: G. W. Cunningham, Technical Director 

FROM: P.F. Gubanc & D.G. Ogg, Hanford Site Representatives 

SUBJECT: Activity Report for Week Ending May 16, 1997
(85 Misc. Rep. 659)

#### In re HESS’ ESTATE.

(Surrogate’s Court, Bronx County.

May, 1914.)

Courts (§ 2001⁄2*)—Sueroqate’s Court—Ownership of Deposit—¿Turismotion to Determine.

The Surrogate’s Court has no jurisdiction on motion to determine whether money deposited in a savings bank in the joint names of decedent and another is the property of the survivor, where the form of the deposit does not as a matter of law vest the ownership in the survivor.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Courts, Cent. Dig. § 479; Dec. Dig. § 200%.*]

In the matter of the estate of George Hess, deceased Motion to compel delivery of savings bank book.

Motion denied.

Louis A. Cuvillier, o.f New York City, for the motion.

Ernest E. L. Hammer, of New York City, public administrator, opposed.

*

For other cases see same topic & § number in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep’r Indexes

SCHULZ, S.

The moving party, the committee of an incompetent, applies for an order directing the public administrator to deliver to him, as such committee, a savings bank book issued to “George Hess, or Emma Hess,” the former being deceased, and the latter being an incompetent and not the wife of the decedent, upon the ground that the same and the moneys whose deposit is evidenced thereby are the property of the incompetent and form no part of the decedent’s estate. The public administrator has possession of this book with other property alleged to belong to the decedent, as also of a document purporting to be the will of the decedent. No letters have been issued to him upon the estate of the decedent, nor has the will been offered for probate.

The right of the committee to the possession of the book involves the question whether the deposit in the manner indicated is a j oint deposit to which Emma Hess became entitled by reason of her survivorship. The form of the deposit of itself, in my opinion, does not as a matter of law vest the ownership of the money deposited in her. Matter of Bolin, 136 N. Y. 177, 32 N. E. 626; Kelly v. Home Savings Bank, 103 App. Div. 141, 92 N. Y. Supp. 578; De Puy v. Stevens, 37 App. Div. 289, 55 N. Y. Supp. 810. The intent of the parties would have to be ascertained from all of the surrounding circumstances. What the intent was when such deposit was. made is a question of fact which I cannot decide upon an application such as this. If the public administrator is unlawfully withholding property which belongs to the incompetent, the committee has a remedy which he can enforce by an action in which evidence can be adduced, upon which findings of fact can be based.

For the reasons stated, the motion must- be denied, without costs.

Ordered accordingly.