alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

July 24, 2012

p0716

Order 

July 24, 2012

144830

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144830

COA: 302274

Washtenaw CC: 10-000527-FC

EDWARD IAN ROBINSON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 28, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Noble Drew Ali Plaza Tenants Association, Respondent, v Noble Drew Ali Plaza Housing Corp. et al., Defendants, and Zvi Kaufman, Also Known as Steve Kaufman, et al., Appellants.

[813 NYS2d 665]

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the use of certain apartments owned by the defendant Noble Drew Ali Plaza Housing Corporation as a Tier II homeless shelter violates a restriction in the deed to the subject property and certain provisions of the Rent Stabilization Code, the defendants Zvi Kaufman, also known as Steve Kaufman, New Lots Towers, LLC, and Eshel Management appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rosenberg, J.), dated March 7, 2003, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was for a preliminary injunction enjoining the defendants from allowing any person without a rent-stabilized lease to take occupancy of an apartment.

Motion by the defendants Noble Drew Ali Plaza Housing Corp. and Abdur Rahman Farrakhan to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the appeal has been rendered academic. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated March 9, 2004, the motion was held in abeyance and was referred to the Justices hearing the appeal for determination upon the argument or submission thereof.

Justice Adams has been substituted for former Justice Sondra Miller *(see*22 NYCRR 670.1 [c]).

Ordered that the motion is granted; and it is further,

*549Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs to the plaintiff.

As a result of certain circumstances that have arisen after the issuance of the order appealed from, the appeal has been rendered academic (see *Saratoga County Chamber of Commerce v Pataki,*100 NY2d 801, 810-811 [2003], *cert denied*540 US 1017 [2003]; *Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne,*50 NY2d 707, 713-714 [1980]; *405 44th St. Realty Co. v 168 Fortune Realty, Inc.,*14 AD3d 481 [2005]). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. Adams, J.P., Krausman, Spolzino and Lifson, JJ., concur.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3011 

To suspend temporarily the duty on phosphor zinc silicate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 24, 2006 

Mr. REID (for Mr. ROCKEFELLER) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on phosphor zinc silicate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PHOSPHOR ZINC SILICATE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.32.34 Phosphor zinc silicate; inorganic products of a kind 

used as luminophores (CAS 

No. 68611–47–2) (provided 

for in subheading 

3206.50.00) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•S 3011 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or with3 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 

4 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                              12
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        1
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    13
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      13
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                          13
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        13
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
5622.001 DEFINITIONS    *(Added January 2015)*       The “Agency Labor Advisor” is an individual responsible for advising contracting agency officials on Federal contract labor matters. The Agency Labor Advisor for USSOCOM is the Air Force Labor Advisor (Eastern Region) who can be reached at http://www.wdol.gov/ala.aspx. **Parent topic:** Part 5622 - APPLICATION OF LABOR LAWS TO GOVERNMENT ACQUISITIONS
|   | 1. | The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: July 12, 2011 |   | /s/ Hsien Loong Wong                                                                                   |
|---------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                |   | Hsien Loong Wong, President, CEO, CFO, Secretary, Treasurer and Director (Principal Financial Officer) |

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

 _____________________________

JEREMIAH W. GREEN *

Plaintiff, *

 v. * 2:06-CV-667-WKW

 

AJA ROBERTS *

Defendant. *

 _____________________________

ORDER ON MOTION

Upon consideration of the motion to withdraw filed by Daniel Fordham, Esq., one of

the attorneys of record for Defendant Sue Roberts, and for good cause, it is 

ORDERED that the motion (Doc. No. 65) be and is hereby GRANTED. 

Done, this 28th day of November 2007.

 /s/ Wallace Capel, Jr. 

WALLACE CAPEL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 66 Filed 11/28/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Jones, Appellant.

Submitted July 30, 2007;

decided September 6, 2007

Reported below, 2007 NY Slip Op 62544(U).

*894Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Robert S. Dean, Esq., Center for Appellate Litigation, 74 Trinity Place, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10006 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
I

n

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

MIDDLE DIVISION

ANTHONY BERNARD MOORER,

Plaintiff,

V. ) CASE NO. No. 2:06-CV-672-WKW.

CITY OF MONTGOMERY, et al,

)

Defendant, )

CONFLICT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

COMES NOW, Anthony Bernard Moorer, a Plaintiff in the above-captioned matter,

and in accordance with the order of this Court, making the following disclosure concerning

parent companies, subsidiaries, partners, limited liability entity members and managers,

trustees (but not trust beneficiaries), affiliates, or similar entities reportable under the

provisions of the Middle District of Alabama's General Order No. 3047:

This party is an individual, or

This party is a governmental entity, or

There are no entities to be reported, or

The following entities and their relationship to the party are hereby reported:

Reportable Entity Relationship to Party

Date______

L9i 1?-)

ANTHONY BERNIAD MOOFER, pro se

4241 Grcenmeadow Drive

MONTGOMERY, AL 36108

334-221-9415

Case 2:06-cv-00672-WKW-WC Document 39 Filed 04/10/2008 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Anthony Bernard Moorer, do hereby Certify that a true and correct copy of the

foregoing has been furnished by U.S. Mail, electronic mail on this < /_day of April

2008, to:

MICHAEL DAVID BOYLE

ALLISON HALE HIGHLEY

Attorneys for the Defendants

CITY OF MONTGOMERY

POST OFFICE BOX 1111

MONTGOMERY, AL 36101-1111

Date Anthony Bernard'oo27

MICHAEL DAVID BOYLE

ALLISON HALE HIGHLEY

CITY OF MONTGOMERY

POST OFFICE BOX 1111

MONTGOMERY, AL 36101-1111

)CJ (\c 4S 1b ci

FRANCESTER D. RILEY ROBINSON

NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF ALABAMA AT LARGE

MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: FEB 23, 2009

BONDED THRU NOTARY PUBLiC UNDERWRITERS

Defendant: THOMAS PROVITT

CITY OF MONTGOMERY

BERNARD HARRIS

HONORABLE WALLACE CAPEL, JR

HONORABLE WILLIAM KEITH WATKINS

Case 2:06-cv-00672-WKW-WC Document 39 Filed 04/10/2008 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00662-MEF-CSC     Document 9      Filed 09/06/2006     Page 1 of 5

Case 2:06-cv-00662-MEF-CSC     Document 9      Filed 09/06/2006     Page 2 of 5

Case 2:06-cv-00662-MEF-CSC     Document 9      Filed 09/06/2006     Page 3 of 5

Case 2:06-cv-00662-MEF-CSC     Document 9      Filed 09/06/2006     Page 4 of 5

Case 2:06-cv-00662-MEF-CSC     Document 9      Filed 09/06/2006     Page 5 of 5
AIR QUALITY DATA

1
AIR QUALITY DATA

• Areas and similar but not the same

• Entire area is marginal except for one 

monitor

• Edgewood monitor (92 ppb) is 10 ppb 

higher than all other area monitors

2

• No data for the Baltimore central city

• No noticeable gradient of increase 

between the two areas

• Combining areas ties both to the “worst 

case”
Baltimore/Washington Ozone Monitors

76 77 92

80

78

76

3

81

79

76

75 73

69

82

76

80

77 79

79
EMISSIONS PROFILES

4
DC AREA EMISSIONS PROFILE

• DC area is motor vehicle oriented (56% in 

2007)

• Mobile emissions have and continue to be 

significantly reduced

 -35,314 NO between 2002 and 2007

5

X between 2002 and 2007

• Point source sector continues to decline

 2011 power plant NOX emissions: 8,636 tons

• Remaining sectors are hard to control 

beyond OTC and federal controls
Washington Emissions Profile – 2007 

NOX

6
Baltimore Emissions Profile – 2008 

NOX

7
EMISSION CONTROLS

8
EMISSION CONTROLS

• The two areas controlled to similar levels

• Statewide EGU emissions & reductions 

have been similar

• VA EGU reductions will continue

 Coal generation likely will cease in next few years 

9

 Coal generation likely will cease in next few years 

(over 2700 megawatts) :

• GenOn Potomac River (482 MW)

• Dominion Yorktown (355 MW)

• Dominion Chesapeake (636 MW)

• Dominion Bremo Bluff (250 MW)

• Dominion Alta Vista (63 mw)

• Dominion Hopewell (63 MW)

• Dominion Southampton (63 MW) 

• AEP Glyn Lyn (335 MW)

• AEP Clinch River (470 MW)
MD/VA Power Plant Emissions Trends

50000

60000

70000

80000

90000

10

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

VA

MD
EMISSION CONTROLS

• Mobile emissions will be further reduced in 

the future by controls already on the books

 67% by 2017

 78% by 2025

 80% by 2040

11

• Tier III could given us up to 30% more

• What’s left – Retrofits and TCMs

 Big money controls with minimal benefits

 DC TCM analysis – 220 tons NOXfor $85 

million (annually)
Washington DC On-Road Mobile Emissions Trends

12
80000

100000

120000

140000

T

o

n

s

P

e

r

Y

e

a

r

Washington DC On-Road Mobile Emissions Trends

13

126953

91639

41709

27180 26590

220 220

0

20000

40000

60000

2002 2007 2017 2025 2040

T

o

n

s

P

e

r

Y

e

a

r

Additional

TCMs
PLANNING IMPLICATIONS

14
Planning Implications and Burdens

• We reject MDE’s “smooth” transition 

prediction

 Current PM2.5 redesignation process is a perfect 

example of potential problems

• Process could easily be hopelessly 

15

bogged down by any number of issues:

 Control strategies & reduction targets

 Mobile emissions budgets

 Growth policies 

 Mission creep such as climate issues
PART 30 –– COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

ADMINISTRATION
#### Leonard Strange et al., Respondents, v William Sampson, Doing Business as Sampson’s Prosthetic Laboratory, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. John P. Neilson, Doing Business as Neilson’s Prosthetic Center, et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents; K & K Prosthetic Supplies, Inc., et al., Third-Party Defendants.

from so much of an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered February 7, 1979 in Schenectady County, as granted a severance of the third-party actions from the action-in-chief. The primary action seeks to recover for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff Leonard Strange, allegedly resulting from the improper manufacture of a right leg prosthesis by defendant and the improper servicing of another artificial limb also by defendant. The action was commenced on March 19,1973 and, although there is some confusion in the record, issue was apparently joined April 17, 1976. The third-party actions against the various third-party defendants were commenced in June and July of 1978. In December, 1978, third-party defendant Ram Chemical Products Division moved for a severance on the grounds that defendant was unable to provide any information as to the nature of the causes of action alleged in the third-party complaint due to its failure to conduct proper pretrial disclosure and that there was an unreasonable delay in commencing the third-party actions. All of the other third-party defendants joined in the motion for severance. Special Term granted the motion and this appeal followed. The court has the discretionary power to sever a third-party action from the main action (CPLR 1010). This record reveals that the third-party actions were not commenced until at least some 15 months after issue was joined in the primary action. The reason for the delay was admittedly due to law office failure to timely complete pretrial disclosure. Considering the record in its entirety, we are of the view that Special Term did not abuse its discretion in granting the severance (see *Shipsey v Katz,*58 AD2d 827; *Vita Food Prods, v Epstein & Sons,*52 AD2d 522). Order affirmed, with costs. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Staley, Jr., and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3381 

To suspend temporarily the duty on malonic acid-dinitrile 50% NMP. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 6, 2006 

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on malonic acid-dinitrile 

50% NMP. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MALONIC ACID-DINITRILE 50% NMP. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.11.04 50% solution of 

malononitrile in methyl-2- 

pyrrolidone solvent (CAS 

Nos. 109–77–3 and 872–50– 

4) (provided for in subheading 3824.90.9190) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•S 3381 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
§ 966.44 Excess funds. ( a ) If, at the end of a fiscal period, the assessments collected are in excess of expenses incurred, such excess shall be accounted for in accordance with one of the following: ( 1 ) If such excess is not retained in a reserve, as provided in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, to the extent practical it shall be refunded proportionately to the persons from whom it was collected.
( 2 ) The committee, with the approval of the Secretary, may establish an operating monetary reserve and may carry over to subsequent fiscal periods excess funds in a reserve so established: *Provided,* That funds in the reserve shall not exceed approximately one fiscal period's expenses. Such reserve funds may be used ( i ) to defray any expenses authorized under this part,
( ii ) to defray expenses during any fiscal period prior to the time assessment income is sufficient to cover such expenses,
( iii ) to cover deficits incurred during any fiscal period when assessment income is less than expenses,
( iv ) to defray expenses incurred during any period when any or all provisions of this part are suspended or are inoperative, and
( v ) to cover necessary expenses of liquidation in the event of termination of this part. Upon such termination any funds not required to defray the necessary expenses of liquidation, and after reasonable effort by the committee it is found impracticable to return such remaining funds to handlers, such funds shall be disposed of in such manner as the Secretary may determine to be appropriate.
( b ) [Reserved]
[33 FR 8586, June 12, 1968]
* Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of

opinions that merely decide particular cases on the basis of

well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the

public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that

Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-60560

Conference Calendar

__________________

JOHNNY HARPER,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

RICHARD MARTIN; JIM MORRIS, 

STAFF ATTORNEY,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 2:95-CV-199-PS

- - - - - - - - - -

December 19, 1995

Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellant Johnny Harper appeals from the district court's

sua sponte dismissal of his civil rights complaint under 42

U.S.C. § 1983, as frivolous. 

On appeal, Harper does not challenge the district court's

determination that the defendants were not involved in the

dismissal of his state circuit court complaint. Issues not
No. 95-60560

-2-

raised on appeal are abandoned. Hobbs v. Blackburn, 752 F.2d

1079, 1083 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 838 (1985). 

Harper argues on appeal that the court should have allowed

him to substitute the state circuit court judge as the proper

defendant. Neither the district court nor this court has

authority to review a final order of a state court. Rooker v.

Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413, 416 (1923); District of

Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 482-87

(1983). Because the complaint, if amended, remains subject to

dismissal, the district court did not abuse its discretion in sua

sponte dismissing Harper's complaint without first allowing him

to amend his complaint. Pan-Islamic Trade Corp. v. Exxon Corp.,

632 F.2d 539, 546 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 927

(1981). Accordingly, Harper's appeal is dismissed as frivolous. 

See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

We caution Harper that any additional frivolous appeals

filed by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid

sanctions, Harper is further cautioned to review all pending

appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are

frivolous because they have been previously decided by this

court.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3079 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3079

       To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Methyl-4-
          trifluoromethoxyphenyl-N-(chlorocarbonyl) carbamate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

 Mr. Sessions introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Methyl-4-
          trifluoromethoxyphenyl-N-(chlorocarbonyl) carbamate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. METHYL-4-TRIFLUOROMETHOXYPHENYL-N-(CHLOROCARBONYL) 
              CARBAMATE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.29.91 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Methyl-4-
trifluoromethoxyphenyl-N-(chlorocarbonyl) carbamate) is amended by 
striking ``12/31/2003'' and inserting ``12/31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
452.247-73 Packing for Overseas Shipment.

As prescribed in 447.305-10(c), insert the following clause:

Packing for Overseas Shipment (FEB 1988)

Supplies shall be packed for overseas shipment in accordance with the best commercial export

practice suitable for water movement to arrive undamaged at ultimate destination.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: Subpart 452.2 - Texts of Provisions and Clauses