alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3387 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3387

  To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain drawback 
                 claims relating to petroleum products.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 6, 2006

  Mr. Vitter introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain drawback 
                 claims relating to petroleum products.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DRAWBACK CLAIMS RELATING TO PETROLEUM PRODUCTS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act of 
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other provision of law, the Bureau of 
Customs and Border Protection of the Department of Homeland Security 
shall, not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, liquidate or reliquidate each drawback claim described in 
subsection (c) at the full amount in each such claim.
    (b) Payment of Amounts Due.--Any amounts owed by the United States 
pursuant to liquidations or reliquidations under subsection (a) shall 
be paid by the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection within 90 days 
after such liquidation or reliquidation.
    (c) Drawback Claims.--The drawback claims referred to in subsection 
(a) are the following:

 
 
 
Drawback Claim Number:              Filing Date:
  BQ900000564.....................  04/18/96
  BQ900000560.....................  05/08/96
  BQ900000580.....................  05/08/96
  BQ900000622.....................  12/10/96
  BQ900000648.....................  01/09/97
  BQ900000135.....................  10/15/95
  BQ900000200.....................  09/18/95
  BQ900000119.....................  10/05/93
  BQ900000051.....................  11/06/94
  BQ900000127.....................  06/15/95
  BQ900000168.....................  06/27/95
  BQ900000176.....................  06/27/95
  BQ900000275.....................  08/04/95
  BQ900000317.....................  08/09/95
  BQ900000291.....................  08/10/95
  BQ900000184.....................  09/18/95
  BQ941000003.....................  09/21/95
  BQ944000000.....................  10/11/95
  BQ900000143.....................  10/27/95
  BQ900000150.....................  01/17/96
  BQ900000234.....................  01/25/96
  BQ900000192.....................  03/26/96
  BQ900000218.....................  03/26/96
  BQ900000358.....................  07/25/96
  BQ900000374.....................  07/25/96
  BQ900000390.....................  07/29/96
  BQ900000416.....................  07/29/96

                                 <all>
```
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3389 

To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain drawback claims. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 6, 2006 

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain 

drawback claims. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIQUIDATION OR RELIQUIDATION OF CERTAIN 

4 DRAWBACK CLAIMS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 514 of 

6 the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other pro7 vision of law, the Bureau of Customs and Border Protec8 tion shall, not later than 90 days after the date of the 

9 enactment of this Act, liquidate or reliquidate the draw10 back claims, as filed, that are described in subsection (c). 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•S 3389 IS 

1 (b) PAYMENT OF AMOUNTS DUE.—Any amounts due 

2 pursuant to the liquidation or reliquidation of the claims 

3 described in subsection (c) shall be paid not later than 

4 90 days after the date of such liquidation or reliquidation. 

5 (c) DRAWBACK CLAIMS.—The drawback claims re6 ferred to in subsection (a) are the following: 

Drawback claim number Filing 

date 

BQ1/9700002–0 06/04/97 

BQ1/0000264–2 08/04/97 

BQ1/0000258–4 08/04/97 

BQ1/0000257–6 08/04/97 

BQ1/0000256–8 08/04/97 

BQ1/0000255–0 08/04/97 

BI6/0992005–2 01/23/97 

BI6/0992006–0 01/23/97 

BI6/0992007–8 01/23/97 

BI6/1092010–9 01/23/97 

BI6/1192012–4 01/23/97 

BI6/1192011–6 01/23/97 

BI6/1192013–2 01/23/97 

BI6/1192014–0 01/23/97 

BI6/1292015–6 01/23/97 

BI6/1292001–6 01/23/97 

BI6/0293022–3 01/23/97 

BI6/0293021–5 01/23/97 

BI6/0493028–8 02/06/97 

BI6/0593033–7 02/06/97 

BI6/1092008–3 01/23/97 

AA6/0303754–7 02/11/98 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 35.2
                  SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                               GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC
              RALI SERIES 2006-QO8 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of GMAC Mortgage,  LLC, as servicer
(the "Servicer")  pursuant to the applicable  servicing  agreement,  does hereby
certify that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under  the   applicable   servicing   agreement  has  been  made  under  my
     supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing  agreement
     in all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:      /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      ------------------------
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title:    Executive Vice President
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KEVIN PAUL WOODRUFF, AKA Wanag
Tahatan

- Bey, as Grantor for Kevin Woodruff Estate Tanya Stutson Estate,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

MASON MCDUFFIE MORTGAGE CORPORATION; CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS, INC.; US BANK, N.A., as
Trustee for Securitized Trust Ginnie Mae
Guaranteed Remic Trust 2017

- 134 Trust; TEXAS CAPITAL BANK, NA;
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.; NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC;
SECRETARY OF VETRANS AFFAIRS AS U.S. OFFICERS,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 22

- 16476

D.C. N o. 3:22

- cv

- 03124

- WHO

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of California William Horsley Orrick, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 18, 2023 * *

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 4 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 22

- 16476

Before: SCHROEDER, RAWLINSON, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Kevin Pau l Woodruff appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action relating to the foreclosure of his home. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under Federal Rule of

Civil P rocedure 12(b)(6). Puri v. Khalsa , 844 F.3d 1152, 1157 (9th Cir. 2017).

We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Woodruff ’s action because Woodruff

failed to allege facts sufficient to state a plausible claim. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal , 556

U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (to avoid dismissal, “a complaint must contain sufficient

factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its

face” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)) ; Sprewell v. Golden State

Warriors , 266 F.3d 979, 988 (9th Cir. 2001) (courts are not required to accept as

true allegations that “contradict matters properly subject to judicial notic e or

exhibit” or allegations that are “ merely conclusory, unwarranted deductions of fact,

or unreasonable inferences”).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised f or the first time on

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

All pending requests are denied.

AFFIRMED.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lawrence Jones, Appellant.

— Judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered May 9, 1979, affirmed. No opinion. This case is remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). Damiani, J. P., Gibbons, Rabin and Margett, JJ., concur.-
# L_2022114EN.01021501.xml

| 12.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 114/215 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 114/215

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EU) No 692/2014 of 23 June 2014 concerning restrictions on the import into the Union of goods originating in Crimea or Sevastopol, in response to the illegal annexation of Crimea and Sevastopol

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 183 of 24 June 2014
  )

On page 13, in the Annex,

for:

‘ITALY

http://www.esteri.it/MAE/IT/Politica_Europea/Deroghe.htm’,

read:

‘ITALY

https://www.esteri.it/it/politica-estera-e-cooperazione-allo-sviluppo/politica_europea/misure_deroghe/’.

---
Search Help More Search Options

Printable Version 

### Residential Clothes Dryers and Room Air Conditioners Preliminary Analytical Tools The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) prepared the analytical spreadsheets listed below for the preliminary analyses conducted for the energy conservation standards rulemaking on residential clothes dryers and room air conditioners.

Life-Cycle Cost (LCC) and Payback Period (PBP) Spreadsheets

z LCC for Clothes Dryers ( Excel 2.4 MB )

z LCC for Room Air Conditioners ( Excel 2.9 MB )

National Impacts Analysis (NIA) Spreadsheets

z NIA for Clothes Dryers ( Excel 2.0 MB )

z NIA for Room Air Conditioners ( Excel 1.4 MB )

Contact Information

Stephen Witkowski Project Manager (202) 586-7436 EERE Information Center Programs and Offices 

### Pa g e 1 of 2 A pp liances and Commercial E q ui p ment Standards: Residential Clothes Dr y ers and Room...

3/3/2010 htt p ://www2.eere.ener gy

. g ov/buildin g s/a pp liance

_ standards/residential/ p reliminar y_ anal y ti...Building Technologies Program Home | EERE Home | U.S. Department of Energy Webmaster | Web Site Policies | Security & Privacy | USA.gov Content Last Updated: 02/26/2010 Printable Version 

### Pa g e 2 of 2 A pp liances and Commercial E q ui p ment Standards: Residential Clothes Dr y ers and Room...

3/3/2010 htt p ://www2.eere.ener gy

. g ov/buildin g s/a pp liance

_ standards/residential/ p reliminar y_ anal y ti...
<PAGE>
                               ASSIGNMENT


     This Assignment is made this 3rd day of January, 1997, by and between 
Data National Corporation ("DNC") and Service Business Systems, Inc. ("SBS").

                                Recitals
                                --------

     SBS is in the business of providing certain information services to 
corporations and other customers.  Certain of the contracts pursuant to which
SBS provides such services are in the name of, or payments under such 
contracts are made to, DNC.

     Since the services under such contracts are performed by SBS, DNC has 
agreed to assign all of its right, title and interest in such contracts and 
rights of payments to SBS.

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual promises
herein contained, DNC does hereby assign and transfer to SBS all of its 
right, title and interest in and to any contracts for the provision of 
information services and any rights to payment under such contracts to SBS.

(Registrant)                              DATA NATIONAL CORPORATION

BY(Signature)                             /s/Donald V. Warriner
(Name and Title)                          Donald V. Warriner,
                                          President and CEO



                                          SERVICES BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC.

BY(Signature)                             /s/Richard S. Simms
(Name and Title)                          Richard S. Simms,
                                          Vice President
**EXHIBIT
        32.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906****OF
        THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 I,
        Andrew
        A. Farina, Chief Financial Officer of Qualstar Corporation (the “Company”),
        certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
        Section 1350, that:
 
 (1)
        the
        Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended
        September 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
        Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
        78m or
        78o(d)); and
 
 (2)
        the
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Dated:
                  November 14, 2007
              /s/   ANDREW
                  A. FARINAAndrew
                  A. FarinaPrincipal
                  Financial Officer
Exhibit 31 CERTIFICATION  I, G. Edward Hancock, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Emazing Interactive, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and  c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and  6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.  Date: March 31, 2008  /s/ G. Edward Hancock G. Edward Hancock Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
# Subpart 1323.2 - Energy and Water Efficiency and Renewable Energy

**Parent topic:**PART 1323 - ENVIRONMENT, ENERGY AND WATER EFFICIENCY, RENEWABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY, AND DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE

## 1323.204 Procurement exemptions.

The designee authorized to exempt the procurement of an ENERGY STAR or Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP)-designated product as described in FAR 23.203 is set forth in CAM 1301.70.
Order entered January 1 3 , 2020

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 01445
- CV
MONTGOMERY J. BENNET T, Appellant

V. MATTHEW ZUCKER, Appellee On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF
- 19
- 17721



### O RDER The notice of appeal recites the final judgment, the order affirming Associate Judge
Danielle Diaz ’s granting of defendant ’ s plea to the jurisdiction, was signed Novembe r 13, 2019.
The clerk ’ s record, however, does not contain a copy of the judgment. Accordingly, we
ORDER Dallas County District Clerk Felicia Pitre to file, no later than January 2 3 , 2020, either a supplemental clerk ’ s record containing a copy of the judg ment or written verification no judgment exists or it cannot be located.
We SUSPEND the deadline for filing appellant ’ s brief on the merits until further order of
the Court. We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Pitre and t he parties.
/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Child DevelopmentEarly Childhood EducationExperiential LearningLearning ActivitiesLearning StrategiesPreschool CurriculumSmall Group InstructionStudent ProjectsTeaching MethodsYoung Children

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
#### In the Matter of Mildred S. Wulff, Respondent-Appellant, v. Teachers’ Retirement Board of the City of New York et al., Appellants-Respondents.

Judgment decreeing petitioner was entitled to retire for disa*930bility from her teaching position on June 25, 1964, and directing respondent, Teachers’ Retirement Board to so retire her and to pay her a retirement allowance, unanimously reversed, on the law, and petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements to any one of the parties as against the other. In view of this disposition, there is no need of reaching that branch of the appeals pertaining to the measure of retirement allowances. Section 243 of the Military Law was manifestly intended to apply to civil service employees whose purpose was to leave their civil service employment temporarily, in response to national need or in order to comply with the draft laws, but who intended to return to their civil service careers upon release from their military duties. It would be a patent absurdity to apply section 243 to the instant petitioner who voluntarily chose to make a permanent and full time career of her Navy service, for more than 20 years, to the exclusion of her Board of Education employment. Indeed, petitioner remained in her Navy post, and as part of the regular Navy, until such time as she was able to lay claim to and successfully obtain a disability retirement pension from the Navy, On the basis of this disability she now seeks a further pension from the Teachers’ Retirement System. The Medical Division of the Teachers’ Retirement Board also pronounced her incapacitated. In fact, petitioner conceded that her disability was such that it was not expected to improve and would in all probability worsen. Thus, she was incapable, in any event, of returning for service in the post which she quitted in the Board of Education on January 16, 1943. A statute cannot be tortured so as to achieve a result which is preposterous *(Holy Trinity Church*v. *United States,*143 U. S. 457, 472) nor should it be so construed as to work a public mischief *(Smith*v. *People,*47 N. Y. 330, 336). The eases of *Matter of Brown*v. *Kennedy*(14 Misc 2d 405) and *Matter of O’Connor*v, *Eppig*(14 Misc 2d 641) cited by petitioner, are factually different, and do not apply. Concur — Eager, J. P., Capozzoli, Rabin, McNally and McGivern, JJ. [50 Misc 2d 1048.]
#### § 948.9 Producer.

*Producer* means any person engaged in the production of potatoes for market.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION DERIVED FROM THE QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,141,461
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          20,740
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 12,587,189
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     79,866,724
<ALLOWANCE>                                    636,242
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              99,752,609
<DEPOSITS>                                  80,958,665
<SHORT-TERM>                                 6,020,912
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            451,098
<LONG-TERM>                                  5,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,483,870
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,838,064
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              99,752,609
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              4,770,378
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              481,920
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                10,857
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             5,263,155
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,293,154
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,619,301
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,643,854
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  150,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,382,156
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                631,420
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     631,420
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   449,492
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.65
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.69
<LOANS-NON>                                     96,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                    18,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              1,572,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               540,158
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   60,000
<RECOVERIES>                                     6,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              636,242
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           380,008
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        256,234
        

</TABLE>