alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

BELINDA GAIL BROWN, )

PLAINTIFF, )

)

VS. ) CIVIL ACTION: 3:06cv00710-MHT

)

LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE )

COMPANY, et al., )

DEFENDANTS. )

PLAINTIFF’S EXHIBIT LIST

COMES NOW the Plaintiff, and hereby lists the exhibits which may be

presented for use at the trial of this case:

1. Any and all records contained in Liberty Mutual Insurance Company’s file

regarding Belinda Brown.

2. Worker’s Compensation agreement of May 23, 1995.

3. Plaintiff’s Independent Medical Examination on August 5, 2003

4. Any and all documents contained in INTRACORP’s Medical Claims File

Review Department.

5. Medical of Belinda Brown from Dr. Efrim C. Moore. 

6. Medical records of Belinda Brown from J. Scott Richards, Ph.D., ABPP.

7. Medical records of Belinda Brown from Dr. Pamela E. Parker.

8. Medical records of Belinda Brown from Dr. Donald S. Orr.

 

9. Medical records of Belinda Brown from Dr. Daniel H. Serrato.

Case 3:06-cv-00710-MHT-TFM Document 22 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 1 of 3
10. Medical records of Belinda Brown from Robert J. Barth, Ph.D. 

11. Medical records of Belinda Brown from Dr. David William Johnson, D.C. 

12. Any and all depositions, and exhibits attached thereto, which have been taken

in this case.

13. Any and all photographs, video, or other depictions of Belinda Brown.

14. Any and all pleadings in this case.

15. Any and all responses to Plaintiff’s discovery requests by Defendant,

including all documents referred to in Defendant’s Answers to

Plaintiff’s Request For Production.

16. Any documents to be used for rebuttal or impeachment.

17. Any exhibit listed by any other party.

18. Blowups or enlargements of any exhibits that have been identified.

s/Stephen D. Heninger 

Stephen D. Heninger [ASB5227E68S]

HENINGER GARRISON DAVIS, LLC

2224 First Avenue North

Birmingham, Alabama 35203

Telephone: (205) 326-3336

Facsimile: (205) 326-3332

E-Mail: sheninger@hgdlawfirm.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 27 day of July, 2007, I electronically filed the

th

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send

notification of such filing to the following:

Case 3:06-cv-00710-MHT-TFM Document 22 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 2 of 3
Richard B. Garrett, Esq.

RUSHTON, STAKELY, JOHNSTON

 & GARRETT, P.A.

P. O. Box 270

Montgomery, Alabama 36101-0270

Telephone: 334.206.3100

Facsimile: 334.263.4157

E-Mail: rbg@rsjg.com

And I certify that I have mailed by United States Postal Service the document

to the following non-CM/ECF participants:

None

s/ Stephen D. Heninger 

Stephen D. Heninger

HENINGER GARRISON DAVIS, LLC

2224 First Avenue North

Birmingham, Alabama 35203

Telephone: (205) 326-3336

Facsimile: (205) 326-3332

E-Mail: sheninger@hgdlawfirm.com

Case 3:06-cv-00710-MHT-TFM Document 22 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 3 of 3
Editorial Note on Part 982
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 61 FR 17559, Apr. 22, 1996.

§ 982.38 Powers. The Board shall have the following powers: ( a ) To administer the provisions of this subpart in accordance with its terms;
( b ) To make rules and regulations to effectuate the terms and provisions of this subpart;
( c ) To receive, investigate, and report to the Secretary complaints of violations of this subpart;
( d ) To recommend to the Secretary amendments to this subpart.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.33
MARATHON PETROLEUM CORPORATION


MODIFICATION TO PERFORMANCE UNIT AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR THE 2016-2018 AND 2017-2019 PERFORMANCE CYCLES


WHEREAS, Marathon Petroleum Corporation (the “Company”) currently maintains and operates the Marathon Petroleum Corporation 2012 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2012 Plan”);
    
WHEREAS, pursuant to the 2012 Plan, the Company granted performance units to certain of its employees in 2016 and in 2017 that vest pursuant to certain terms and conditions, including the achievement of performance objectives over a three-year period beginning in 2016 and 2017, respectively (the “Performance Units”), which grants are evidenced by award agreements (such agreements, the “Performance Unit Award Agreements”);
    
WHEREAS, Section 5(a) of the 2012 Plan and Section 15 of the Performance Unit Award Agreements permit the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Committee”) to modify the terms of the Performance Unit Award Agreements; and
    
WHEREAS, the Committee desires to modify the Performance Unit Award Agreements to align the payment timing set forth in Section 7 upon a Qualified Termination (as defined in the Performance Unit Award Agreements) with the payment in the event of a participant’s retirement.


NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of December 22, 2017, Section 7 of all outstanding Performance Unit Award Agreements shall be modified to read in its entirety as follows: 


“7.     Vesting Upon a Qualified Termination. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, upon a Participant’s Qualified Termination prior to the end of the Performance Cycle, the Participant’s right to receive the Performance Units, unless previously forfeited pursuant to Paragraph 4, shall vest in full and the Payout Percentage shall be determined as follows: (i) for the time period from the beginning of the Performance Cycle to the date of the Change in Control, the Payout Percentage shall be based upon actual TSR Performance Percentile; and (ii) for the time period from the date of the Change in Control to the Qualified Termination, the Payout Percentage shall be 100%.  A payment equal to the vested value of the Performance Units shall be made in accordance with Paragraph 3, except that it shall be made 100% in cash and between January 1 and March 15 immediately following the end of the Performance Cycle.  Such vesting shall satisfy the rights of the Participant and the obligations of the Corporation under this Award Agreement in full.”




 







Except as otherwise provided herein, each Performance Unit Award Agreement shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with its terms, and any capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this modification shall have the meaning given to such term in the Performance Unit Award Agreement or the 2012 Plan, as applicable.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Modification is hereby executed on December 22, 2017.


                                




                                
	
		
	MARATHON PETROLEUM CORPORATION

	






	 
	 

	 
	Rodney P. Nichols
Executive Vice President, Human Resources and Administrative Services








2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

EASTERN DIVISION 

BRIAN BONNER, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Case No.: 3:06-cv-00715-MHT 

 ) 

NORINCO a/k/a ) 

CHINA NORTH INDUSTRIES CORP. ) 

et al., ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND

DEFENDANT CHINA NORTH INDUSTRIES CORPORATION’S

EXPERT DISCLOSURE DEADLINE

Defendant China North Industries Corporation (“Norinco”) respectfully requests 

the Court to extend the deadline by which Norinco must disclose its expert witnesses 

under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) by sixty days, to bring it in line with the 

deadline for defendant Qiqihar Hawk Industries Co., Ltd. (“Qiqihar Hawk”). As grounds 

for this motion Norinco states as follows: 

1. Counsel for Norinco has conferred with all other parties to this action as to 

whether they agree or oppose this motion. All parties, including Plaintiff, agree to the 

extension request. 

2. On July 12, 2007, this Court entered a Scheduling Order (Doc. # 46) 

setting defendants’ expert disclosure deadline for March 3, 2008. 

3. On January 25, 2008, defendant Qiqihar Hawk filed an unopposed motion 

to extend that deadline by sixty days (Doc. # 70). 

Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 79 Filed 02/22/2008 Page 1 of 3
 2

4. This Court granted Qiqihar Hawk’s motion on January 28, 2008 (Doc. # 

71). 

5. Granting Norinco the same extension will provide uniformity and will not 

interfere with the other deadlines established in the Court’s Scheduling Order. 

For the foregoing reasons, Norinco respectfully requests that the Court extend 

Norinco’s expert disclosure deadline by sixty days. 

Respectfully submitted, 

s/ James C. Barton, Jr. 

James C. Barton, Jr. (BAR014) 

Bar Number: ASB-0237-B51J 

Email: jbartonjr@johnstonbarton.com 

s/ Alan D. Mathis 

Alan D. Mathis (MAT052) 

Bar Number: ASB-8922-A59M 

Email: adm@johnstonbarton.com 

Attorneys for defendant 

China North Industries Corporation 

JOHNSTON BARTON PROCTOR & ROSE LLP 

Colonial Brookwood Center 

569 Brookwood Village, Suite 901 

Birmingham, Alabama 35209 

(205) 458-9400 

(205) 458-9500 (FAX) 

OF COUNSEL 

Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 79 Filed 02/22/2008 Page 2 of 3
 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I electronically filed the above and foregoing with the Clerk 

of the Court on February 22, 2008, using the CM/ECF system, which will send 

notification of such filing to the following: 

 

David J. Hodge, Esq. 

PITTMAN, DUTTON, KIRBY & HELLUMS, P.C. 

2001 Park Place North 

1100 Park Place Tower 

Birmingham, Alabama 35203 

Nick Wooten, Esq. 

WOOTEN & CARLTON, P.C. 

P.O. Drawer 290 

Lafayette, Alabama 36862 

Todd M. Higey, Esq. 

 RICHARDSONCLEMENT, P.C. 

 200 Cahaba Park Circle 

 Suite 125 

 Birmingham, Alabama 35242 

 

 

 s/ Alan D. Mathis 

 Of Counsel 

W0633182.DOC 

Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 79 Filed 02/22/2008 Page 3 of 3
---

---

Exhibit 15

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of DirectorsRRsat Global
Communications Network Ltd.:

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statement (No. 333-140936) on Form S-8 of RRsat Global
Communications Network Ltd. (the Company) of our report dated March 23,2009 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as
of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
changes in shareholders equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008 and the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, which report appears in
the December 31, 2008 Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company.

Somekh Chaikin
Certified Public Accountants (Israel)
Member Firm of KPMG International
Tel-Aviv, Israel
March 23, 2009



---

---
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

ROBERT BLANKENSHIP, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv648-MHT

) 

PFIZER, INC., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motions to dismiss (doc. nos.

1 and 10) are set for submission, without oral argument,

on August 21, 2006, with all briefs due by said date.

DONE, this the 28th day of July, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 15 Filed 07/28/2006 Page 1 of 1
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 7563

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
,
Plaintiff

- Appellee
,

v.
CORTNEY BLAIRE SAYLOR, a/k/a C
,
Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Martinsburg

. Gina M. Groh
, Chief District Judge. ( 3:15

- cr

- 00020

- GMG

- RWT

- 25 )

Submitted : March 29, 2018 Decided: April 3, 2018

Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Cortney Blaire Saylor, Appellant Pro Se. Shawn Michael Adkins, Paul Thomas Camilletti, Anna Zartler Krasinski, Assistant United States At torneys, Lara Kay Omps

- Botteicher, Martinsburg, West Virginia, Lynette Danae DeMasi

- Lemon, Betsy Steinfeld Jividen, Assistant United States Attorneys, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are n ot binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Cortney Blaire Saylor appeals the district court’s order denying her 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion s for a sent ence reduction

. A ny reduction in sentence under

§ 3582(c)(2) must be based on an amendm ent to the Sentencing Guidelines. U.S.
Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 1B1.10(a)(2), p.s. (2016 ). Because Saylor does not make
any argument on appeal based on any amendment, no reduction in sentence is authorized. *

Accordingly
, we affirm the district cou rt ’s denial of relief . We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Because Saylor does not challenge on appeal the district court’s disposition of her claim based on Amendment 794 to the Sentencing Guidelines, she has forfeited appellate review of that issue. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>            9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>        MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>             DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                              1,570
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                         729
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                        19,490
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        0 *
<PP&E>                                332
<DEPRECIATION>                        209
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     29,356
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   0 *
<BONDS>                            17,900
<COMMON>                               29
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<OTHER-SE>                          6,299
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       29,356  
<SALES>                            42,988
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   43,663
<CGS>                              37,220
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      42,796
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       867
<INCOME-TAX>                           50
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   817
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                          817
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                        0.30
                                   


* - the Company does not present a classified balance sheet



</TABLE>
#### § 920.62 Right of the Secretary.

The members of the committee (including successors and alternates), and any agents, employees, or representatives thereof, shall be subject to removal or suspension by the Secretary at any time. Each and every regulation, decision, determination, or other act of the committee shall be subject to the continuing right of the Secretary to disapprove of the same at any time. Upon such disapproval, the disapproved action of the committee shall be deemed null and void, except as to acts done in reliance thereon or in accordance therewith prior to such disapproval by the Secretary.
Subpart 1428.3 - Insurance    **Parent topic:** PART 1428 - BONDS AND INSURANCE1428.301 Policy.       It is the policy of DOI to insure its own risks only when such action is in the best interest of the Government. Circumstances where contractors are required to carry insurance are listed under FAR 28.301 and 28.306. In these circumstances, the CO shall insert the clause at 1452.228-70, Liability Insurance -  Department of the Interior, in solicitations and contracts.1428.306 Insurance under fixed-price contracts.1428.306-70 Insurance for aircraft services contracts.       (a) *Policy.* The CO shall insert minimum insurance requirements in aircraft services contracts in order to protect the Government and its contractors.          (b) *Applicability.* The clauses prescribed in section 1428.311-2 are applicable to all fixed-price contracts involving use of aircraft with either a contractor-furnished or a Government-furnished pilot except for one-time charters when Government exposure is minimal and time limitations are present.1428.311 Solicitation provision and contract clause on liability insurance under cost-reimbursement contracts.1428.311-1 Contract clause.       The CO shall modify the clause at FAR 52.228-7, Insurance - Liability to Third Persons, in accordance with 1452.228-7, and insert in solicitations and contracts as prescribed in FAR 28.311-1.1428.311-2 Agency solicitation provisions and contract clauses.       The following DOI clauses shall be used as prescribed:          (a) The CO shall insert the clause at 1452.228-71, Aircraft and General Public Liability Insurance - Department of the Interior, in solicitations and contracts when a fixed-price contract for operation of aircraft is anticipated and where the Government is using a contractor-furnished pilot.          (b) The CO shall insert the clause at 1452.228-72, Liability for Loss or Damage - Department of the Interior, in solicitations and contracts when a fixed-price contract for use of aircraft is anticipated and where the Government does not have a property interest and is using a Government-furnished pilot.          (c) The CO shall insert the clause at 1452.228-73, Liability for Loss or Damage (Property Interest) - Department of the Interior, in solicitations and contracts when a fixed-price contract for use of aircraft is anticipated and where the Government has a property interest in the aircraft and is using a Government-furnished pilot (*e.g.,* a lease with purchase option).
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 29, 2015

p0921

Order 

Clerk

September 29, 2015

150512(53)

PETER BORMUTH,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 150512

COA: 316298

Jackson CC: 12-001559-CE

WEST BAY EXPLORATION COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s June 30, 2015 

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of KINGDOM KONCRETE, INC. on Form 10-K for the periods ending December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:




1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





/s/ EDWARD STEVENS

Edward Stevens CEO

Dated: February 1, 2011



/s/ EDWARD STEVENS

Edward Stevens

CFO

Dated: February 1, 2011




This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
':31-\ '13 61• 

REC_EIYED <J..i. SOCMA OPP f CBIC ~·~ ' -C I~:;·'· i l~ t·f'·P:'t: ~ ,.~. ;.t~;~·~,!!-(·r~ (.~ /.~~~;~~:.:;..__ 

I 

::::3 I 

Document Control Office (DCO) (7407 M) 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Taxies (OPPT) 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

EPA East Building, Room E6428 (202-564-8930) 

1201 Constitution Ave., NW 

Washington, DC 20460 

Attention: TSCA Section 4 

40 CFR 799.5087 

Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2007-0531 

To Whom It May Concern: 

lOll JU' 39 Bit I. hh 

July 30, 2012 

1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 

4 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 8 2 

RE: Testing of Certain High Production Volume Chemicals; Second Group of Chemicals. Federal 

Register 76 (5), 1067-1093, January 7, 2011. 

1 ,3,5-Triazine-1 ,3,5(2H,4H,6H)· Triethanol (CAS No. 4719-04-4) 

The MEA Triazine Consortium makes this final submission to fulfill the reporting obligations under the 

subject test rule for 1 ,3,5-triazine-1 ,3,5(2H,4H,6H)-triethanol (CAS No. 4719-04-4), also known as MEA 

Triazine. The consortium is formed and managed under the Society of Chemical Manufacturers and Affiliates 

(SOCMA). 

The consortium has completed the testing for the following endpoint in compliance with the test rule 

and according to current OPPTS Harmonized Guidelines: 

Toxicity to Plants (Algae): ASTM E 1218-04e1 

Included in this submission are the Final Report from the test facility, Harlan Laboratories Ltd., and a 

Robust Summary. 

The participating member companies of the MEA Triazine Consortium are: 

Baker Petrolite Corporation (a Baker Hughes company) 

Champion Technologies, Inc. 

Clearwater International, LLC 

Conlen Surfactant Technology, Inc. 

GE Betz, Inc. doing business as GE Water & Process Technologies 

Huntsman Petrochemical Corporation 

Momentive Specialty Chemicals Inc. 

CONTAfNS NO Cf? 
0 2 Technologies, LLC 

Stepan Company 

Syrgis PChem 

SOCMA 

Please contact the undersigned directly at 202-721-4154 or helmest@socma.com for further 

information or follow up concerning this testing or the final report. 

cc: Paul Campanella 

Sincerely, 

C. Tucker Helmes, Ph.D. 

Executive Director 

MEA Triazine Consortium
#### BLANCK, Respondent, v. PRESTON, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 27, 1906.)

Action by Mary Ann Blanek against Charles M. Preston, as receiver of the New York Building Loan Banking Company.

No opinion. Motion granted.
DOE Plug-In Vehicle and Infrastructure Community

Readiness Workshop

July 22nd, 2010

Welcome, Jake [LOGOUT]

PLUG-IN VEHICLE and INFRASTRUCTURE

WORKSHOP AGENDA

U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence

Ave., S.W.

Washington, D.C. 20585

Main Auditorium, July 22, 2010

8:30 - 8:45 Welcoming Remarks and Workshop

Purpose

David Sandalow, Assistant Secretary for Policy and

International Affairs, DOE

8:45 - 9:15 Case study: Oregon's plug-in vehicle

and infrastructure plan

Rick Wallace, Oregon Department of Energy

9:15 - 11:00 Panel Discussion: Planning,

Processes, Financing, and Partnerships

Planning a city's plug-in vehicle

deployment efforts

The charger installation and

permitting process

Incentives and financing models

for vehicles, chargers, and power

Partnerships across city

governments, utilities, nonprofits,

educational institutions, and other

key actors

Panel moderated by Don Karner, ECOtality

Panelists: Colleen Crowinshield, Pima Association

of Governments (AZ); Susan Freedman, San Diego

Association of Governments (CA); Paul Mitchell,

Energy Systems Network (IN); Laura Spanjian, City

of Houston (TX); Rick Wallace, Oregon Department

of Energy

11:00 - 12:00 Facilitated discussion on

community best practices

12:00 - 1:00 Lunch

1:00 - 2:15 Automakers' & dealers' perspectives

on building plug-in vehicle markets

Incentives, innovative city models, technical, first

responder and other workforce training, outreach and

consumer education

Panel moderated by Patrick Davis, U.S.

Department of Energy

Panelists: Nancy Gioia, Ford; Douglas

Greenhaus, National Automobile Dealers Association;

WEBCAST ARCHIVES

WEBCAST SPONSORS

WEBCAST POWERED BY