alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-34 (f)
(logo) KPMG

KPMG LLP
1601 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103-2499


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Members
Regulus Group LLC:

We have examined management's assessment for those customers that
management has informed us have requested confirmation of compliance, included
in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB
Servicing Criteria, that Regulus Group LLC complied with the servicing criteria
set forth in Item 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) of the Securities and
Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for remittance processing services to those
issuers of asset backed securities and servicers of loan and/or receivables
portfolios that include pool assets for asset backed securities transactions
(the Platform) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006. Regulus Group LLC
has determined that the remainder of the servicing criteria are not applicable
to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2006. Management is responsible for the Company's
compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on management's assessment about the Company's compliance based on our
examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures
as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included
testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and
securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing
activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company
processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in
compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited
to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company
during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to
determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our
tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by
the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected
transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides
a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assessment that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006
is fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ KPMG LLP


Philadelphia, PA
February 22, 2007


KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, is the U.S.
member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2550 

To provide for direct access to electronic tax return filing, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 5, 2006 

Mr. AKAKA (for himself and Mr. BINGAMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To provide for direct access to electronic tax return filing, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Free Internet Filing 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DIRECT ACCESS TO E-FILE FEDERAL INCOME TAX 

7 RETURNS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Treasury 

9 shall provide individual taxpayers with the ability to elec10 tronically file their Federal income tax returns through 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
2 

•S 2550 IS

1 the Internal Revenue Service website without the use of 

2 an intermediary or with the use of an intermediary which 

3 is contracted by the Internal Revenue Service to provide 

4 free universal access for such filing (hereafter in this sec5 tion referred to as the ‘‘direct e-file program’’) for taxable 

6 years beginning after the date which is not later than 3 

7 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

8 (b) DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATION OF PROGRAM.— 

9 In providing for the development and operation of the di10 rect e-file program, the Secretary of the Treasury shall— 

11 (1) consult with nonprofit organizations rep12 resenting the interests of taxpayers as well as other 

13 private and nonprofit organizations and Federal, 

14 State, and local agencies as determined appropriate 

15 by the Secretary, 

16 (2) promulgate such regulations as necessary to 

17 administer such program, and 

18 (3) conduct a public information and consumer 

19 education campaign to encourage taxpayers to use 

20 the direct e-file program. 

21 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 

22 authorized to be appropriated such sums as are necessary 

23 to carry out the direct e-file program. Any sums so appro24 priated shall remain available until expended. 

25 (d) REPORTS TO CONGRESS.— 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
3 

•S 2550 IS

1 (1) REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION.—The Sec2 retary of the Treasury shall report to the Committee 

3 on Finance of the Senate and the Committee on 

4 Ways and Means of the House of Representatives 

5 every 6 months regarding the status of the imple6 mentation of the direct e-file program. 

7 (2) REPORT ON USAGE.—The Secretary of the 

8 Treasury, in consultation with the National Tax9 payer Advocate, shall report to the Committee on 

10 Finance of the Senate and the Committee on Ways 

11 and Means of the House of Representatives annually 

12 on taxpayer usage of the direct e-file program. 

Æ 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
**BF** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 18 - 0 578 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,
v. AUSTIN MICHAEL WHITE ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 14 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including July 1 1 , 2020 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 19 2020

06/19/2020

Case Number: DA 18-0578
#### Joseph Calvaruso, an Infant, by Gloria Calvaruso, His Natural Guardian, et al., Respondents, v. Our Lady of Peace Roman Catholic Church et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.) Joseph Calvaruso, an Infant, by Gloria Calvaruso, His Natural Guardian, et al., Respondents, v. St. Charles Hospital, Appellant, et al., Defendant. (Action No. 2.)

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 4, 1968, which granted plaintiffs’ motion to consolidate the two actions and for other incidental relief. Order affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. In our opinion, the advantages resulting from the consolidation outweigh the arguments against consolidation (cf. *Weiss*v. *City of New York,*27 A D 2d 709). Under the circumstances disclosed, the liability, if any, and extent of damage caused by each of the defendants, should be resolved by the same trier of the facts. Beldock, P. J., Brennan, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:94cr3012LAC

LEONARD BRADSHAW

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on August 21, 2006 

Motion/Pleadings REQUEST FOR A NUNC PRO TUNC REVIEW PURSUANT TO TITLE

18, U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) 

Filed byDEFENDANT PRO SE on 8/7/06 Doc.# 735

RESPONSES:

BY GOVERNMENT on 8/23/06 Doc.# 736

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Mary Maloy

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 25th day of

August, 2006, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) Successive motion. The Court lacks jurisdiction. 

 s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 3:94-cr-03012-LC-MD Document 737 Filed 08/25/06 Page 1 of 1
§ 945.44 Excess funds. ( a ) The funds remaining at the end of a fiscal period which are in excess of the expenses necessary for committee operations during such period may be carried over, with the approval of the Secretary, into following periods as a reserve. Such reserve shall be established at an amount not to exceed approximately one fiscal period's budgeted expenses. Funds in such reserve shall be available for use by the committee for expenses authorized under § 945.40.
( b ) Funds in excess of those placed in the operating reserve shall be credited proportionately against a handler's operations of the following fiscal period, except that if the handler demands payment, such proportionate refund shall be paid to such handler.
( c ) Upon termination of this part, any funds not required to defray the necessary expenses of liquidation shall be disposed of in such manner as the Secretary may determine to be appropriate. To the extent practical, such funds shall be returned pro rata to the persons from whom such funds were collected.
[23 FR 5709, July 30, 1958. Redesignated at 26 FR 12751, Dec. 30, 1961, as amended at 53 FR 3189, Feb. 4, 1988]
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3353 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Basic Violet 1. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 5, 2006 

Mr. KENNEDY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Basic Violet 1. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BASIC VIOLET 1. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.31.23 Basic Violet 1 (CAS No. 8004–87–3) 

(provided for in subheading 3204.13.80) Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 3353 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
# Subpart 942.2 - Contract Administration Services

Source:                                65 FR 81007, Dec. 22, 2000, unless otherwise noted.                               

**Parent topic:**PART 942 - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT SERVICES

## 942.270-1 Contracting Officer's Representatives.

In accordance with internal agency procedures, a contracting officer may designate other qualified personnel to be the Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) for the purpose of performing certain technical functions in administering a contract. These functions include, but are not limited to, technical monitoring, inspection, approval of shop drawings, testing, and approval of samples. The COR acts solely as a technical representative of the contracting officer and is not authorized to perform any function that results in a change in the scope, price, terms or conditions of the contract. COR designations must be made in writing by the contracting officer, and shall identify the responsibilities and limitations of the designation. A copy of the COR designation must be furnished to the contractor and the contract administration office.    

## 942.270-2 Contract clause.

The clause at 952.242-70, Technical Direction, or a clause substantially the same, may be inserted in solicitations and contracts when a designated Contracting Officer's Representative will issue technical direction to the contractor under the contract.
FAA UAS Civil COA. Request 

Any infmmation that is provided is bound by the Freedom of information Act (FOI!>,) and may be releasabie. This 

requires compliance to FOIA and consen t to U;e release of your information. lf you do not consent to tile release of 

your inforrnation, you must contact us for further guidance. For more information, please visit http://vvvv~:v. ia .g v/ . 

Date ~2/26/2015 333 Exemption # or 

Federa! Register Docket# I I ---·-· -

Proponent lnfonn ation 

Contact Name ~eff ey 

Company Name ~ir Drones Atlanta 

Street Address 1 11894 Connemara Drive 

Street Address 2 

Citv J ~tlanta 

State jQA El Zip Code !30341' I 

P!1one Number 1770-455-6645 

E-mail Address !SkyDronesAtlanta@gmail.coh 

Aircraft Svstem .. 

,L\ircraft Type !UAV I 

.l\ircraft Registration IN/A I 

Performance Characteristics 

Ctimb Rate ~ m/s 

(Feet/Minute) 

Descent Rate 

(F•2et!M!nute) 

~m/s 

<:IL-1 YL{
Subpart 742.7—Indirect Cost Rates

Parent topic: PART 742—CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION

742.770 Negotiated indirect cost rate agreement.

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 4206, Jan. 23, 2024.

Except for educational institutions having a cognizant agency (as defined in OMB Circular A–88, 44

FR 70094, 12/5/79) other than USAID, USAID may establish negotiated overhead rates in a

Negotiated Indirect Cost Rate Agreement, executed by both parties. The Negotiated Indirect Cost

Rate Agreement is automatically incorporated in each contract between the parties and shall

specify: (a) The final rate(s), (b) the base(s) to which the rate(s) apply, (c) the period(s) for which the

rate(s) apply, (d) the items treated as direct costs, and (e) the contract(s) to which the rate(s) apply.

The Negotiated Indirect Cost Rate Agreement shall not change any monetary ceiling, obligation, or

specific cost allowance or disallowance provided for in each contract between the parties.
Sarbanes Oxley Certification


  I, E. Todd Whittemore, certify that:

   1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form
10-K of Lehman XS Trust 2006-17, (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and
other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted
in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in this report
under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange
Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under
the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item
1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed
in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in
such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
Citibank, N.A., as Trustee and Paying Agent; Deutsche Bank National Trust
Company, as Custodian; IndyMac Bank, F.S.B., as Servicer; LaSalle Bank
National Association, as Custodian; U.S. Bank National Association, as
Custodian; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.,
as Servicer;  Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as sub-contractor for
IndyMac Bank, F.S.B;  First American Real Estate Solutions of Texas LP, as
sub-contractor for Aurora Loan Services LLC; Newport Management Corporation,
as sub-contractor for Aurora Loan Services LLC; Newport Management
Corporation, as sub-contractor IndyMac Bank, F.S.B.; Regulus Group LLC, as
sub-contractor for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.; ZC Sterling Insurance Agency Inc.
as sub-contractor for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A..

     Dated:    March 30, 2007

By : /s/ E. Todd Whittemore
    --------------------------------------------------------
         E. Todd Whittemore
         Executive Vice President
SUBCHAPTER I - DEPARTMENT

SUPPLEMENTAL REGULATIONS

PART 1370 - UNIVERSAL SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES

PART 1371 - ACQUISITIONS INVOLVING SHIP CONSTRUCTION AND SHIP REPAIR

PARTS 1372-1399 [RESERVED]

PART 1370 - UNIVERSAL SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES

Subpart 1370.1 - Provisions and Clauses

1370.101 Period of performance.

1370.102 Pre-bid/pre-proposal conference and site visit.

PART 1371 - ACQUISITIONS INVOLVING SHIP CONSTRUCTION AND SHIP REPAIR

Subpart 1371.1 - Provisions and Clauses

1371.101 Inspection and manner of doing work.

1371.102 Method of payment and invoicing instructions for ship repair.

1371.103 Additional item requirements (AIR) - growth work.

1371.104 Schedule of work.

1371.105 Foreseeable cost factors pertaining to different shipyard locations.

1371.106 Delivery and shifting of the vessel.

1371.107 Performance.

1371.108 Delays.

1371.109 Minimization of delay due to Government furnished property.

1371.110 Liability and insurance.

1371.111 Title.

1371.112 Discharge of liens.

1371.113 Department of Labor occupational safety and health standards for ship

repair.

1371.114 Government review, comment, acceptance, and approval.

1371.115 Access to the vessel.

1371.116 Documentation of requests for equitable adjustment.

1371.117 Lay days.

1371.118 Changes - ship repair.

1371.119 Guarantees.

1371.120 Temporary services.

1371.121 Insurance requirements.

PARTS 1372-1399 [RESERVED]
#### § 985.61 Records.

Each handler shall maintain such records pertaining to all oil handled as will substantiate the required reports. All such records shall be maintained for not less than 2 years after the termination of the marketing year to which such records relate.
Corrected revision 9/28/05 by C. Cinalli - 

 

Revised on 8/31/2005 by C. Cinalli using revised engineering report 

 Changes 

are in bold. 

Page of 

POST-FOCUS INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT 

Case Number: P050324 Assessor: Cinalli 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES 

Scenario#: 1 Number of Release Sites: 

Release Activity: 

Release Description: WATER LANDFILL INCINER LAND/INCIN FUGITIVE 

Total Releases: 

(kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) 

Release Days/yr: 

Per Site Release: 

(kg/day) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/day) 

Remarks: 

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 5
EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 5
Page of 

POST-FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT 

Case Number: P050324 Assessor: Cinalli 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES 

Scenario#: 2 Number of Release Sites: 

Release Activity: 

Release Description: WATER LANDFILL INCINER LAND/INCIN FUGITIVE 

Total Releases: 

(kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) 

Release Days/yr: 

Per Site Release: 

(kg/day) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/day) 

Remarks: 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 5
Page of 

POST-FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT 

Case Number: P050324 Assessor: Cinalli 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES 

Scenario#: 3 Number of Release Sites: 

Release Activity: 

Release Description: WATER LANDFILL INCINER LAND/INCIN FUGITIVE 

Total Releases: 

(kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) 

Release Days/yr: 

Per Site Release: 

(kg/day) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/day) 

Remarks: 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 5
POST-FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT Page of 

CASE NUMBER:P050324 

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 5
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1990
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1990
<CASH>                                           5,773
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,773
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,012
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       406,761
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,761
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,773
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      277
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                        81
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (358)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>