alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Glenn Dennard et al., Respondents, v Small World Center, Inc., Appellant.

[815 NYS2d 240]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Baisley, Jr., J.), entered September 29, 2004, which, upon a jury verdict finding it 98% at fault in the happening of the accident, and finding that the infant plaintiff sustained damages in the sum of $250,000 for past pain and suffering and in the sum of $550,000 for future pain and suffering, and upon the denial of its motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a) to set aside the verdict, is in favor of the plaintiffs and against it.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the action is dismissed.

On April 10, 2000 the infant plaintiff, then five years old, was in the bathroom at a day care center operated by the defendant Small World Center, Inc. (hereinafter Small World), when, as the jury found, he was sexually assaulted by another student. The infant plaintiff and his father brought this action against Small World, alleging inadequate supervision. After trial, the jmy found that Small World was 98% at fault in the happening of the accident and awarded to the infant plaintiff the principal sums of $250,000 for past pain and suffering and $550,000 for future pain and suffering. Small World then moved pursuant to *731CPLR 4404 (a), inter alia, to set aside the verdict on liability. The Supreme Court denied Small World’s motion. We reverse.

“In determining whether the duty to provide adequate supervision has been breached in the context of injuries caused by the acts of fellow students, it must be established that school authorities had sufficiently specific knowledge or notice of the dangerous conduct which caused injury; that is, that the third-party acts could reasonably have been anticipated” *(Mirand v City of New York,*84 NY2d 44, 49 [1994]; *see Whitfield v Board of Educ. of City of Mount Vernon,*14 AD3d 552, 552-553 [2005]). In this case, the plaintiffs presented no evidence indicating that Small World had any knowledge or notice of prior sexual activity or violence. Further, Small World presented evidence that there were no complaints about sexual activity at its center before the subject incident, and the student who allegedly committed the assault had no history of physical or sexual violence.

Therefore there was no valid line of reasoning which would support the jury’s verdict *(see Nicastro v Park,*113 AD2d 129 [1985]). Small World is entitled to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the action.

In light of our determination, we need not reach Small World’s remaining contentions. Adams, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein and Covello, JJ., concur.
#### § 945.26 Failure to nominate.

If nominations are not made within the time and in the manner specified by the Secretary pursuant to § 945.25, the Secretary may, without regard to nominations, select the committee members and alternates on the basis of the representation prescribed in this subpart.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

WILLIAM D. BOWDEN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No.: 2:06-CV-665

)

MISSION PETROLEUM CARRIERS, )

ANTONIO MARTINEZ NAVARRO )

)

Defendants. )

MOTION TO COMPEL

COMES NOW the Plaintiff, by and through undersigned counsel and respectfully

requests this Honorable Court to compel Defendant Antonio M. Navarro to produce consolidated

discovery responses to the Plaintiff. In support of this motion, Plaintiff shows the following:

1. Plaintiff served Defendant Navarro with the complaint and consolidated discovery

in Houston, Texas on November 29, 2006 by a representative of the Harris County Constable’s

Office. To date, Defendant Navarro has failed to submit discovery responses.

2. Before filing this discovery motion, Plaintiff’s counsel sent a letters dated

February 20, 2007, March 20, 2007 and April 3, 2007 requesting discovery responses and/or

attempting to resolve the subject of the discovery motion. [See Exhibits 1-3].

WHEREFORE, the above premises considered, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this

Honorable Court compel Defendant Navarro to answer Plaintiff's consolidated discovery.

 Respectfully submitted on this 13th day of April, 2007.

OF COUNSEL:

McPHILLIPS, SHINBAUM, L.L.P.

516 S. Perry Street

P. O. Box 64 /s/ James G. Bodin 

Montgomery, Alabama 36101 JAMES G. BODIN (BOD005)

Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 35 Filed 04/13/2007 Page 1 of 2
(334) 262-1911

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have served a copy of the document(s) above via U.S. Mail,

postage 

prepaid, to the following attorneys of record, on this the 13th day of April, 2007:

Caroline T. Pryor, Esq.

CARR ALLISON

P. O. Box 1126

Daphne, Alabama 36526

 /s/ James G. Bodin 

 Of Counsel

Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 35 Filed 04/13/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 35-2 Filed 04/13/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 35-3 Filed 04/13/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 35-4 Filed 04/13/2007 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

M IDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABA M A

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

August 21, 2006

NOTICE OF CORRECTION

From: Clerk’s Office

Case Style: David Finney v. Nissan North America, Inc., et al.

Case Number: 2:05-cv-1222-MEF

Pleadings #10, 11 and 12 - Motions for Admission Pro Hac Vice

Notice of Correction is being filed this date to advise that the referenced motions were filed

without Certificates of Good Standing attached.

Certificates of Good Standing for Attorneys Chilton Davis Varner, Andrew T. Bayman and

Robert B. Friedman are attached to this notice.

Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 13 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 1 of 1
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3187 Reported in Senate (RS)]







                                                       Calendar No. 483
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3187

To designate the Post Office located at 5755 Post Road, East Greenwich, 
        Rhode Island, as the ``Richard L. Cevoli Post Office''.


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

 Mr. Reed (for himself and Mr. Chafee) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                             June 22, 2006

               Reported by Ms. Collins, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
To designate the Post Office located at 5755 Post Road, East Greenwich, 
        Rhode Island, as the ``Richard L. Cevoli Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RICHARD L. CEVOLI POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The post office located at 5755 Post Road, East 
Greenwich, Rhode Island, shall be known and designated as the ``Richard 
L. Cevoli Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the post office referred 
to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Richard 
L. Cevoli Post Office.
                                                       Calendar No. 483

109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3187

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To designate the Post Office located at 5755 Post Road, East Greenwich, 
        Rhode Island, as the ``Richard L. Cevoli Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 22, 2006

                       Reported without amendment`
252.217-7028 Over and Above Work.       As prescribed in                 217.7702             , use a clause substantially as follows:          OVER AND ABOVE WORK (DEC 1991)          (a)  *Definitions.*  As used in this clause—          (1)  “Over and above work” means work discovered during the course of performing overhaul, maintenance, and repair efforts that is—          (i)  Within the general scope of the contract;          (ii)  Not covered by the line item(s) for the basic work under the contract; and          (iii)  Necessary in order to satisfactorily complete the contract.          (2)  “Work request” means a document prepared by the Contractor which describes over and above work being proposed.          (b)  The Contractor and Administrative Contracting Officer shall mutually agree to procedures for Government administration and Contractor performance of over and above work requests.  If the parties cannot agree upon the procedures, the Administrative Contracting Officer has the unilateral right to direct the over and above work procedures to be followed.  These procedures shall, as a minimum, cover—          (1)  The format, content, and submission of work requests by the Contractor.  Work requests shall contain data on the type of discrepancy disclosed, the specific location of the discrepancy, and the estimated labor hours and material required to correct the discrepancy.  Data shall be sufficient to satisfy contract requirements and obtain the authorization of the Contracting Officer to perform the proposed work;          (2)  Government review, verification, and authorization of the work; and          (3)  Proposal pricing, submission, negotiation, and definitization.          (c)  Upon discovery of the need for over and above work, the Contractor shall prepare and furnish to the Government a work request in accordance with the agreed-to procedures.          (d)  The Government shall—          (1)  Promptly review the work request;          (2)  Verify that the proposed work is required and not covered under the basic contract line item(s);          (3)  Verify that the proposed corrective action is appropriate; and          (4)  Authorize over and above work as necessary.          (e)  The Contractor shall promptly submit to the Contracting Officer, a proposal for the over and above work.  The Government and Contractor will then negotiate a settlement for the over and above work.  Contract modifications will be executed to definitize all over and above work.          (f)  Failure to agree on the price of over and above work shall be a dispute within the meaning of the Disputes clause of this contract.          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 252.217 RESERVED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

MARIE TOOLE and CHRIS TOOLE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06CV652-VPM

) [WO]

ALFA MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., )

MATTHEW CHUPP; and DON )

BRAMLETT, )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER ON MOTION

On 7 August 2006, the plaintiffs filed a Motion to Remand (Doc. # 6). Upon

consideration of the motion, and for good cause, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. The defendants shall file their responses to the motion on or before 25 August

2006.

2. Because the motion to remand is deemed a dispositive motion, even though

this case is assigned to the undersigned Magistrate Judge, the parties have not

yet consented to disposition of this case by a Magistrate Judge. Therefore, on

or before 25 August 2006, all of the parties are DIRECTED to notify the Clerk

of the court whether they wish to consent to the Magistrate Judge in writing by

sending a completed consent form to the Clerk of the court. A copy of the

form is enclosed for a party's use. The parties are ADVISED that they may

freely decline to consent without adverse consequences.

Case 2:06-cv-00652-MHT-WC Document 7 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 1 of 3
DONE this 10 day of August, 2006. th

/s/ Vanzetta Penn McPherson

VANZETTA PENN MCPHERSON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00652-MHT-WC Document 7 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 2 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

MARIE TOOLE and CHRIS TOOLE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06CR652-VPM

) [WO]

ALFA MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., )

MATTHEW CHUPP; and DON )

BRAMLETT, )

)

Defendants. )

CONSENT TO JURISDICTION BY A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

In accordance with the provisions of Title 28, U.S.C. § 636(c), the undersigned party or

parties to the above-captioned civil matter who previously have indicated their consent to the

jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge of this Court, hereby confirm in writing their consent to a United

States Magistrate Judge conducting any and all further proceedings in the case, including trial, and

ordering the entry of a final judgment.

___________________________ __________________________________________

DATE SIGNATURE

__________________________________________

COUNSEL FOR (print name of all parties)

__________________________________________

ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE

__________________________________________

TELEPHONE NUMBER

Case 2:06-cv-00652-MHT-WC Document 7 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Company's consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31,
2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                   1,020,161
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               82,353
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 5,000
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         1,128,514
<PP&E>                                                   3,660,011
<DEPRECIATION>                                           2,082,416
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           2,706,109
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      206,980
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                   544,936
<OTHER-SE>                                               1,954,166
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             2,706,109
<SALES>                                                    154,150
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           154,150
<CGS>                                                       92,492
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              343,236
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           (189,086)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       (189,086)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                              (189,086)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                 (0.009)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               (0.009)


</TABLE>
JESSICA J. LYUBLANOVITS

CLERK OF COURT

111 N. ADAMS STREET

TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32301-7717

850.521.3501

850.521.3656 FAX

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

Visit our web site at www.flnd.uscourts.gov

SHEILA HURST-RAYBORN

CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK

111 N. ADAMS STREET

TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32301-7717

850.521.3501

850.521.3656 FAX

Reply to: Gainesville Division

July 10, 2014

Counsel of Record

5:99cr15 SPM

USA v Kelly

Dear Counsel:

The Clerk's office currently retains exhibits in the above referenced case. Please see ECF

docket entry 964.

An Order by this court or a Mandate by the appellate court has closed this case. In

accordance with Local Rule 5.2 (Exhibits - Disposition), please be advised that the exhibits will

need to be picked up or disposed of by July 24, 2014. You should complete the bottom portion and

return it, indicating your preference.

Sincerely,

JESSICA J. LYUBLANOVITS, Clerk

áB g|TÇÇ fàtÜ~

by TiAnn S. Stark

Courtroom Deputy Clerk

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I will have the exhibits picked up from you office no later than .

I do not desire the return of the exhibits, you may dispose of them.

 

Attorney's Signature Attorney's Name (Printed)

Please circle one -

I represent: Government Defendant

The mission of the Office of the Clerk of the Northern District of Florida is to provide superior service to the public and the Court.

Gainesville Division

401 SE 1st Avenue, STE 243

Gainesville, Florida 32601

352.380.2400

352.380.2424 FAX

Pensacola Division

1 N. Palafox Street

Pensacola, Florida 32502-5658

850.435.8440

850.433.5972 FAX

Tallahassee Division

111 N. Adams Street

Tallahassee, Florida 32301-7717

850.521.3501

850.521.3656 FAX

Panama City Division

30 W. Government Street

Panama City, Florida 32401

850.769.4556

850.769.7528 FAX

Case 5:99-cr-00015-SPM-MD Document 1776 Filed 07/10/14 Page 1 of 1
Unassociated Document


    
      

    

    
      UNANIMOUS
CONSENT OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF

      
        ADINO
ENERGY CORPORATION

      

      
        
   


      Pursuant to Montana Code Section
35-1-432, the directors of Adino Energy Corporation (the “Company”) hereby take
the following corporate action, which shall have the same force and effect as if
the same were taken at a duly called meeting of the Board of Directors of the
Company.  The directors signing this consent certify that they have
waived notice of meeting.

      


      WHEREAS,
the Company believes the members of the Board of Directors are entitled to
compensation for their efforts as Directors

      


      THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED that the Company authorizes the following payments to the members
of the Board of Directors in Rule 144 restricted common stock as of the closing
price on February 20, 2009:

      
        
          
            
              
                
                  
                    	 	 
	
                            Sonny
      Wooley

                          	
                            1,500,000
      shares

                          
	
                            Timothy
      G. Byrd, Sr.

                          	
                            1,500,000
      shares

                          
	
                            Peggy
      Behrens

                          	
                            500,000
      shares

                          
	 	 


                  

                

              

            

          

        

      

      WHEREFORE,
THE FOREGOING CORPORATE ACTS ARE HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AS OF
THE LATEST DATE WRITTEN BELOW.

       

      _/s/___________________________

      Sonny Wooley

      Chairman of the Board of
Directors

      Date:  2/20/2009


      


      _/s/___________________________

      Timothy G. Byrd, Sr.

      Director

      Date:  2/20/2009


      


      _/s/___________________________

      Peggy Behrens

      Director

      Date:  2/20/2009
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2954 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2954

  To reduce temporarily the duty on certain footwear not covering the 
            ankle with coated or laminated textile fabrics.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 23, 2006

  Mr. Carper introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To reduce temporarily the duty on certain footwear not covering the 
            ankle with coated or laminated textile fabrics.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN FOOTWEAR NOT COVERING THE ANKLE WITH COATED OR 
              LAMINATED TEXTILE FABRICS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.64.10      Men's footwear,     20%          No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         not covering the                                                   31/2009
                         ankle, valued
                         over $20/pair
                         designed to be
                         worn over, or in
                         lieu of, other
                         footwear as a
                         protection
                         against water,
                         oil, grease or
                         chemicals or cold
                         or inclement
                         weather where
                         such protection
                         includes
                         protection
                         against water
                         that is imparted
                         by the use of a
                         coated or
                         laminated textile
                         fabric (except
                         footwear with
                         waterproof
                         injection molded
                         bottoms, i.e.
                         comprising a
                         complete outer
                         sole and all or
                         part of the
                         upper) (provided
                         in subheading
                         6404.19.20)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
13.301 Government–wide commercial

purchase card.

(b) References: Government-wide Commercial Purchase Card Policy and Procedures .

(S-90) Using the Government-wide commercial purchase card to acquire and pay for supplies and

services does not "exempt" DISA from the Economy Act. See FAR/DFARS Subpart 17.5 for Economy

Act applicability.

Parent topic: SUBPART 13.3 –– SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION METHODS
Editorial Note on Part 869
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 869 appear at 84 FR 45646, Aug. 30, 2019.

§ 869.101 Financial records and reporting requirements. ( a ) Warehouse operators must maintain complete, accurate, and current financial records that must be available to AMS for review or audit at AMS's request as may be prescribed in the applicable licensing agreement.
( b ) Warehouse operators must, annually, present a financial statement as may be prescribed in the applicable licensing agreement to AMS.
#### § 52.8 Filing of application.

An application for inspection service shall be regarded as filed only when made in accordance with the regulations in this part.