alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 635.6 Equitable relief by State Conservationists. ( a ) *State Conservationists' Authority.* State Conservationists have the authority to grant requests for equitable relief under this section when— ( 1 ) The program matter with respect to which the relief is sought is a program matter in a covered program operated within the authorized jurisdiction of the State Conservationist;
( 2 ) The total amount of relief (including payments and other benefits) that will be provided to the participant under this section during the fiscal year is less than $20,000;
( 3 ) The total amount of such relief that has been previously provided to the participant using this section in the fiscal year, as calculated in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, is not more than $5,000;
( 4 ) The total amount of payments and benefits of any kind for which relief is provided to similarly situated participants by a State Conservationist in a fiscal year, is not more than $1,000,000.
( b ) *Additional limits on authority.* The authority provided under this section does not extend to the administration of: ( 1 ) Payment limitations under part 1400 of this title;
( 2 ) Payment limitations under a conservation program administered by the Secretary; or
( 3 ) The highly erodible land and wetland conservation requirements under subtitles B or C of Title XII of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3811 *et seq.*).
( c ) *Concurrence by the Office of the General Counsel.* Relief shall only be made under this part after consultation with, and concurrence by, the Office of General Counsel.
( d ) *Secretary's reversal authority.* A decision made under this part by the State Conservationist may be reversed only by the Secretary, who may not delegate that authority.
( e ) *Relation to other authorities.* The authority provided under this section is in addition to any other applicable authority that may allow relief.
#### PADDELL, Appellant v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July 12, 1906.)

Action by Timothy F. Paddell against the city of New York. E. V. Abbott, for anpellant. U. S. Coleman, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment (100 N. Y. Supp. 581) affirmed, with costs. Order filed.
EXTENSION AGREEMENT




THIS EXTENSION AGREEMENT is dated March 10, 2011, but has an effective date of November 15, 2010.




BETWEEN:




HUBEI MINKANG PHARMACEUTICAL LTD.




and




HBMK LIMITED




WHEREAS the parties are party to a Letter of Intent, dated September 27, 2010, which was fully executed on October 18, 2010;




AND WHEREAS the parties have been unable to enter into a Formal Agreement by November 15, 2010;




AND WHEREAS Section 13 of the Letter of Intent provides among other things that if the parties have not entered into a Formal Agreement on or before November 15, 2010, then either party may terminate the Letter of Intent and that the Letter of Intent shall have no force and effect unless the deadline date for entering into a Formal Agreement is extended as may be mutually agreed to by the parties in writing for a maximum of 14 days per extension.




NOW THEREFORE for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto covenant and agree as follows:




1.  Since the parties have not entered into a Formal Agreement on or before November 15, 2010, the parties hereby agree to extend the deadline date for entering into a Formal Agreement to on or before April 30, 2011.




2.  The deadline date in Section 13 of the Letter of Intent shall be extended to April 30, 2011.




3.  All other terms and conditions of the Letter of Intent shall remain in full force and effect.




4.  This Extension Agreement may be executed in original or counterpart form, delivered by facsimile or otherwise, and when executed by the parties as aforesaid, shall be deemed to constitute one agreement and shall take effect as such.









IN WITNESS WHEREOF each of the Parties hereto has hereunto executed this Extension Agreement as set forth on the front page of this Extension Agreement.




HUBEI MINKANG
)PHARMACEUTICAL LTD.
)))Per:   /s/ Hsien Loong Wong
)Authorized Signatory
))Hsien Loong Wong, Director
)(print name and title)







HBMK LIMITED
))))Per:   /s/ Lee Tong Tai
)Authorized Signatory
))Lee Tong Tai, Director
)(print name and title)
252.247-7026 Evaluation Preference for Use of Domestic Shipyards — Applicable to Acquisition of Carriage by Vessel for DoD Cargo in the Coastwise or Noncontiguous Trade.       As prescribed in                 247.574             (d), use the following provision:          EVALUATION PREFERENCE FOR USE OF DOMESTIC SHIPYARDS — APPLICABLE TO ACQUISITION OF CARRIAGE BY VESSEL FOR DOD CARGO IN THE COASTWISE OR NONCONTIGUOUS TRADE (NOV 2008)          (a)  *Definitions*.  As used in this provision—          “Covered vessel” means a vessel—          (1)  Owned, operated, or controlled by the offeror; and          (2)  Qualified to engage in the carriage of cargo in the coastwise or noncontiguous trade under Section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 U.S.C. 12101, 12132, and 55102), commonly referred to as “Jones Act”; 46 U.S.C. 12102, 12112, and 12119; and Section 2 of the Shipping Act, 1916 (46 U.S.C. 50501).          “Foreign shipyard” means a shipyard that is not a U.S. shipyard.          “Overhaul, repair, and maintenance work” means work requiring a shipyard period greater than or equal to 5 calendar days.          “Shipyard” means a facility capable of performing overhaul, repair, and maintenance work on covered vessels.          “U.S. shipyard” means a shipyard that is located in any State of the United States or in Guam.          (b)  This solicitation includes an evaluation criterion that considers the extent to which the offeror has had overhaul, repair, and maintenance work for covered vessels performed in U.S. shipyards.          (c)  The offeror shall provide the following information with its offer, addressing all covered vessels for which overhaul, repair, and maintenance work has been performed during the period covering the current calendar year, up to the date of proposal submission, and the preceding four calendar years:          (1)  Name of vessel.          (2)  Description and cost of qualifying shipyard work performed in U.S. shipyards.          (3)  Description and cost of qualifying shipyard work performed in foreign shipyards and whether—          (i)  Such work was performed as emergency repairs in foreign shipyards due to accident, emergency, Act of God, or an infirmity to the vessel, and safety considerations warranted taking the vessel to a foreign shipyard; or          (ii)  Such work was paid for or reimbursed by the U.S. Government.          (4)  Names of shipyards that performed the work.          (5)  Inclusive dates of work performed.          (d)  Offerors are responsible for submitting accurate information.  The Contracting Officer—          (1)  Will use the information to evaluate offers in accordance with the criteria specified in the solicitation; and          (2)  Reserves the right to request supporting documentation if determined necessary in the proposal evaluation process.          (e)  The Department of Defense will provide the information submitted in response to this provision to the congressional defense committees, as required by Section 1017 of Pub. L. 109-364.          (End of provision)    **Parent topic:** 252.247 RESERVED
# 5239.001 Applicability.

****(a) All requests for DOD CIO approval of acquisition of          a data server farm, data center or information systems technology used in a data center          shall be submitted to DASN(P) by email at usn.pentagon.asstsecnavrdadc.mbx.pabt@us.navy.mil with the subject          “[Activity Name] FAR 39.001 - Data Farm/Center IT Approval.”

**Parent topic:**Part 5239 - ACQUISITION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
161 So.2d 276

#### Lewis E. CARPENTER v. NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY COMPANY.

No. 47132.

March 11, 1964.

In re: Lewis E. Carpenter applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Lafayette. 159 So.2d 757.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal the result is correct.
Exhibit 35
                                  ----------


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWABS, INC.
                 CWABS ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES TRUST 2006-18
                   ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-18


      The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an officer
of Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing
LP (the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant to
Section 3.17 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned
Series (the "Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the Agreement
has been made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
throughout such calendar year.



/s/ Craig Baingo                                        Dated: March 14, 2007
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
5245.602-3 Screening.

(a) To accomplish the screening requirements within prescribed time periods, the following

procedures shall be employed:

(S-90)(1) Upon receipt of inventory schedules in acceptable form, the plant clearance office should

provide an original to the requiring activity and copies to DON inventory managers, the contracting

activity, and Naval activities other than inventory managers who have potential requirements for the

property.

(2) Provide retention and redistribution requirements of the owning Commands, Offices and Bureaus

(requiring activities), inventory managers, contracting activities and other Naval activities directly to

the reporting office during this period.

(b) The final approval for contractor retention of standard components of special test equipment

(STE) or for the transfer of industrial plant equipment items that are components of STE, shall be

made by the contracting officer in lieu of the ACO.

(c) Prior to authorizing retention of items in storage the contracting officer shall ensure that a

retention plan has been developed. Retention plans shall include the justification for storage, a

detailed description of the property to be stored, storage costs, location, planned period of storage,

and source of funds for storage. The use of "no-costs" or no direct cost storage agreements is

prohibited.

Parent topic: 5245.602 Reutilization of Government property.
§ 917.17 Nomination of shipper members of the Control Committee. Nominations for the 12 members of the Control Committee to represent shippers shall be made in the following manner: ( a ) By February 1 of each year the Control Committee shall announce a time and place for a meeting of all shippers of fruit and shall conduct the election of nominees at such meeting. At said election meeting the shippers present shall select a nominee for each of the shipper member positions on the Control Committee. Each shipper shall cast only one vote.
( b ) No shipper shall be entitled to participate in the nomination of members of the Control Committee, or be eligible for membership on such committee, if such shipper has failed to pay the assessments, due to be paid by him pursuant to the provisions of § 917.37.
Effective Date Note
Effective Date Note: At 76 FR 66605, Oct. 27, 2011, § 917.17 was suspended indefinitely, effective Oct. 28, 2011.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 32 (Thursday, February 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7290-7291]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3125]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLIDC00000.L16400000.BF0000.241A.0; 4500012112]


Notice of Public Meeting, Coeur d'Alene District Resource 
Advisory Council Meeting and Recreation Subcommittee Meeting; Idaho

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
(FLPMA), the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), and the 
Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act of 2004 (FLREA), the U.S. 
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Coeur 
d'Alene District Resource Advisory Council

[[Page 7291]]

(RAC) and Recreation RAC Subcommittee will meet as indicated below.

DATES: April 6-7, 2010. The meeting will start at 8 a.m. on April 6 and 
end around 12 p.m. on April 7. The public comment period will be from 1 
p.m. to 1:30 p.m. on April 6. The meeting will be held at the Bureau of 
Land Management Office, 3815 Schreiber Way, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa Wagner, RAC Coordinator, BLM 
Coeur d'Alene District, 3815 Schreiber Way, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83815 
or telephone at (208) 769-5014.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 15-member RAC advises the Secretary of 
the Interior, through the Bureau of Land Management, on a variety of 
planning and management issues associated with public land management 
in Idaho. The agenda will include the following topics: Election of 
Officers, project update by the field offices, presentation by the 
Forest Service on recreation fees (Recreation RAC Subcommittee) and 
field trip of BLM recreation site--Blue Creek Bay and Mineral Ridge. 
Additional topics may be added and will be included in local media 
announcements. More information is available at http://www.blm.gov/rac/id/id_index.htm. All meetings are open to the public. The public may 
present written comments to the RAC in advance of or at the meeting. 
Each formal RAC meeting will also have time allocated for receiving 
public comments. Depending on the number of persons wishing to comment 
and time available, the time for individual oral comments may be 
limited. Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, 
such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should contact the BLM as provided above.

    Dated: February 8, 2010.
Gary D. Cooper,
District Manager.
[FR Doc. 2010-3125 Filed 2-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GG-P
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.19


EXECUTION COPY


PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL


Exhibit A 
(the “Amendment to Interim CEO Agreement”)


AMENDMENT TO CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER TERM SHEET
    
THIS AMENDMENT TO CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER TERM SHEET (the “Amendment”) is entered into effective as of March 6, 2018.
WHEREAS, Stone Energy Corporation (the “Company”) and James Trimble (“Executive”) entered into that certain Chief Executive Officer Term Sheet effective as of April 28, 2017 (the “Interim CEO Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Interim CEO Agreement to provide for the payment to Executive of an annual bonus for 2018 under certain circumstances.   
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants herein set forth and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
		
	1.
	The Interim CEO Agreement is hereby amended and supplemented by adding to the section titled “Annual Bonus,” a new third paragraph, to appear after the second paragraph, as follows:


“Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, in the event of a Corporate Change of the Company or the termination of Executive’s employment by the Company without Cause or by the Executive for Good Reason, in each case occurring prior to December 31, 2018, Executive will be paid a prorated Target Bonus for the period from January 1, 2018, through the date of such event, which payment shall be made in a lump sum in 2018, subject to Executive’s execution, delivery and irrevocability of a release of claims no later than the sixtieth (60th) day following such event.”
		
	2.
	This Amendment shall, as and from the effective date set forth above, be read and construed with the Interim CEO Agreement and be a part thereof for all purposes.  The terms of the Interim CEO Agreement except as amended and supplemented by this Amendment are ratified and confirmed and the Interim CEO Agreement as amended by this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 




		
	3.
	This Amendment shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Louisiana, without regard to the rules thereof relating to conflicts of law.




		
	4.
	This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which together shall constitute one and the same Agreement; signed copies of this Agreement may be delivered by .pdf, .jpeg, or fax and will be accepted as an original




[signature page follows]















IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment effective as of the date set forth above. 


STONE ENERGY CORPORATION
                
By:  /s/ Neal P. Goldman                       
Name:  Neal P. Goldman
Title:  Chairman of the Board of Directors    


            
EXECUTIVE    


/s/ James M. Trimble                             
James M. Trimble
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
Guidance Software, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies that:



| | (i) | the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                                         
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------
|                      |  | 
|Dated: March 14, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/    FRANK J. SANSONE                 
|                      |  |  |  | Frank J. Sansone Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (Section 906), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to Guidance Software, Inc. and will be retained by Guidance Software, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA OF

NORTHERN DIVISION

RALPH BROWN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-642-MEF

)

CHAMPION ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the defendant's Motion for Leave to File (Doc. #29) filed on

July 20, 2007, it is hereby 

ORDERED that the plaintiff show cause in writing on or before August 6, 2007 as to

why this motion should not be granted.

DONE this the 31st day of July, 2007.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 30 Filed 07/31/2007 Page 1 of 1
162 So.2d 12

#### Martin McNUTT, Jr. v. H. B. HUGHES CONSTRUCTION CO. and The Travelers Insurance Company or The Travelers Indemnity Company.

No. 47169.

March 31, 1964.

In re: Martin McNutt, Jr., applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson. 161 So.2d 315.

Writ refused. No error of law.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3263 

To suspend temporarily the duty on brass lamp-holder housings containing 

sockets. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 26, 2006 

Mr. FRIST (for Mrs. DOLE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on brass lamp-holder 

housings containing sockets. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN BRASS LAMP-HOLDER HOUSINGS 

4 CONTAINING SOCKETS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.85.34 Brass lamp-holder housings containing 

sockets (provided for in subheading 

8536.61.00) ............................................. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 3263 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MICHAEL ALEXANDER LEE

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 3290

[ December 12, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County ; Glenn D. Kelley , Judge; L.T. Case No. 2016CF008738

.

Gary L. Pickett, West Palm Beach, (withdrawn as counsel after filing

briefs), and Thomas Montgomery, Belle Glade , for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Joseph D. Corona to,

Jr., Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

D AMOORGIAN

, G ERBER and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Part 5234 - MAJOR SYSTEM ACQUISITION       Subpart 5234.2 - EARNED VALUE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM                                                         5234.203 Solicitation provisions and contract clause.                                                                             Subpart 5234.70 - ACQUISITION OF MAJOR WEAPON SYSTEMS AS COMMERCIAL ITEMS                                                         5234.7002 Policy.    Subpart 5234.2 - EARNED VALUE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM     5234.203 Solicitation provisions and contract clause.    Notwithstanding DFARS 234.203 and in accordance with DASN(AP&B) memo entitled, “Earned Value Management Applicability Determination Delegation and Policy”, dated 8 January 2021, contracting officers shall not apply Earned Value Management (EVM) to Level of Effort (LOE) CLINs or solicitations or contracts that have an approved EVM Applicability Determination (AD) for non-applicability. A copy of the approved EVM AD shall be included in the contract file.Subpart 5234.70 - ACQUISITION OF MAJOR WEAPON SYSTEMS AS COMMERCIAL ITEMS     5234.7002 Policy.    ****(a)(1)(i) Submit the required written determination for          approval by the Secretary of Defense/Deputy Secretary of Defense accompanied by a proposed          Congressional notification letter satisfying the requirements at DFARS 234.7002(a)(1)(ii)          and a copy of the approved AS, STRAP, or MOPAS-S to DASN(P) by email at usn.pentagon.asstsecnavrdadc.mbx.pabt@us.navy.mil with the subject          “[Activity Name] DFARS 234.7002(a)(i) - D&F: Approval to Acquire a Major Weapon System          as a Commercial Item.”