alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 920.20 Establishment and membership.

There is hereby established a Kiwifruit Administrative Committee consisting of 12 members, each of whom shall have an alternate who shall have the same qualifications as the member for whom he or she is an alternate. The 12-member committee shall be made up of the following: One public member (and alternate), and eleven members (and alternates). With the exception of the public member and alternate, all members and their respective alternates shall be growers or employees of growers. In accordance with § 920.31(l), district representation on the committee shall be based upon the previous five-year average production in the district and shall be established so as to provide an equitable relationship between membership and districts. The committee may, with the approval of the Secretary, provide such other allocation of membership as may be necessary to assure equitable representation.

[75 FR 37291, June 29, 2010]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3219 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3219

  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain pepperoncini prepared or 
          preserved otherwise than by vinegar or acetic acid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain pepperoncini prepared or 
          preserved otherwise than by vinegar or acetic acid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN PEPPERONCINI PREPARED OR PRESERVED OTHERWISE THAN BY 
              VINEGAR OR ACETIC ACID.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.10.27        Pepperoncini, prepared  Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           or preserved                                                      31/2009          ''
                           otherwise than by                                                                   .
                           vinegar, not frozen
                           (provided for in
                           subheading
                           2005.90.55)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
52.247-45 F.o.b. Origin and/or F.o.b.

Destination Evaluation.

As prescribed in 47.305-2(b), insert the following provision in solicitations when offers are solicited

on the basis of both f.o.b. origin and f.o.b. destination:

F.o.b. Origin and/or F.o.b. Destination Evaluation (Apr 1984)

Offers are invited on the basis of both f.o.b. origin and f.o.b. destination, and the Government will

award on the basis the Contracting Officer determines to be most advantageous to the Government.

An offer on the basis of f.o.b. origin only or f.o.b. destination only is acceptable, but will be evaluated

only on the basis submitted.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.247 [Reserved]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on December 31, 2009, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), the Ice Crystal Consortium (“ICC”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Airbus SAS, Toulouse, FRANCE has been added as a party to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project.

                    On July 28, 2009, ICC filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on August 26, 2009 (74 FR 43157).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2010-3088 Filed 2-22-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE M
[Cite as State ex rel. Paige v. Corrigan, 129 Ohio St.3d 448, 2011-Ohio-4057.] 

THE STATE EX REL. PAIGE, APPELLANT, v. CORRIGAN, JUDGE, APPELLEE. 

[Cite as State ex rel. Paige v. Corrigan, 129 Ohio St.3d 448, 2011-Ohio-4057.] 

Mandamus to correct sentencing error — Adequate remedy by appeal to correct 

sentencing error — Denial of writ affirmed. 

 (No. 2011-0478 — Submitted August 8, 2011 — Decided August 17, 2011.) 

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, 

No. 95864, 2011-Ohio-743. 

__________________ 

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying the request 

of appellant, Arnold Paige, for a writ of mandamus to compel appellee, Cuyahoga 

County Court of Common Pleas Judge Peter Corrigan, to vacate his sentence and 

resentence him. Paige “had an adequate remedy by way of direct appeal from his 

sentence to raise his claim that he did not receive proper notification about 

postrelease control at his sentencing hearing.” Briseno v. Cook, 121 Ohio St.3d 

38, 2009-Ohio-308, 901 N.E.2d 798, ¶ 1; Patterson v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 

120 Ohio St.3d 311, 2008-Ohio-6147, 898 N.E.2d 950, ¶ 8. Paige also had an 

adequate remedy by appeal to raise his claims that his March 2004 sentencing 

entry contained incorrect terms of postrelease control. State ex rel. Tucker v. 

Forchione, 128 Ohio St.3d 298, 2010-Ohio-6291, 943 N.E.2d 1006, ¶ 1; State ex 

rel. Pruitt v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 125 Ohio St.3d 402, 2010-

Ohio-1808, 928 N.E.2d 722, ¶ 4. This disposition renders moot Judge Corrigan’s 

motion to strike Paige’s merit brief. 

Judgment affirmed. 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

2

O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL,

LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. 

__________________ 

 Arnold Paige, pro se. 

______________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>



<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>            SEP-30-2000

<CASH>                           9,965,026
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                      438,352
<ALLOWANCES>                          0
<INVENTORY>                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                10,403,378
<PP&E>                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  10,553,143
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            1,204,221
<BONDS>                         67,815,350
<COMMON>                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<OTHER-SE>                     (67,008,501)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    10,553,143
<SALES>                            397,086
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 1,757,450
<CGS>                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      348,855
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 2,204,465
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               5,206,406
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (8,125,116)
<INCOME-TAX>                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (8,125,116)
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                  2,697,477
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                    (5,427,639)
<EPS-BASIC>                       (11.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (11.75)




</TABLE>
53.110 Continuation sheets.       Except as may be otherwise indicated in the FAR, all standard forms prescribed by the FAR may be continued on (a) plain paper of similar specification, or (b) specially constructed continuation sheets (*e.g.,*             OF336). Continuation sheets shall be annotated in the upper right-hand corner with the reference number of the document being continued and the serial page number.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 53.1 - General
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

JAMES PETTY, #124252, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-639-WKW

) (WO)

RAY B. FINEDOR, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

On January 30, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 31) that the

claims of Plaintiff be dismissed without prejudice. Upon an independent review of the file in this

case, upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and there being no timely

objections filed, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 31) is ADOPTED; and

2. Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. # 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice.

An appropriate judgment will be entered.

DONE this the 26th day of February, 2007.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00639-WKW-TFM Document 32 Filed 02/26/2007 Page 1 of 1
Part 5248 - VALUE ENGINEERING       Subpart 5248.1 - POLICIES AND PROCEDURES                                                         5248.103 Processing value engineering change proposals.    Subpart 5248.1 - POLICIES AND PROCEDURES     5248.103 Processing value engineering change proposals.    (a) HCAs are responsible for establishing procedures for processing and evaluating VECPs, consistent with the requirements of FAR Part 48.
|                     |   |   |   |                                                                                                   |
|--------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: September 10, 2009 |   |   |   |  /s/ Thomas R. BurtonThomas R. BurtonPresident, Chief Executive Officer                           |
|                     |   |   |   |                                                                                                   |
|                     |   |   |   |                                                                                                   |
| Date: September 10, 2009 |   |   |   |  /s/ Robert A. MasseyRobert A. MasseySenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|                     |   |   |   |                                                                                                   |
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-17-00621-CV

HOLT TEXAS, LTD. d/b/a Holt Cat and d/b/a Holt Rental Services,

Appellant

v.

M&M CRUSHED STONE PRODUCTS, INC.,

Appellee

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017-CI-07186

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE MARTINEZ, AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the order of the trial court is 

REVERSED, and judgment is RENDERED that appellee’s claim for tortious interference with 

prospective business relations is DISMISSED. The cause is remanded to the trial court to 

determine the amount appellant should be awarded under section 27.009(a) of the Texas Citizens 

Participation Act. It is ORDERED that appellant recover its costs of this appeal from appellee. 

SIGNED August 22, 2018.

_____________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER JON PERGROSSI,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:20-cv-210-AW-GRJ

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING IN PART REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This is one of the many frivolous pro se cases Christopher Jon Pergrossi has 

recently filed in this court. I have considered the magistrate judge’s omnibus order 

to show cause and report and recommendation. ECF No. 4. No objections were 

filed.* I agree with the magistrate judge that the action is frivolous and has wasted 

court resources. On the issue of sanctions, the judge in the first-filed case found it to 

be a close call but did not impose sanctions. See No. 1:20-cv-181-MW-GRJ, ECF 

No. 7. I will likewise not impose sanctions at this time.

The clerk will enter judgment that says, “This case is DISMISSED without 

leave to amend pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).” The clerk will close the file.

* In another of his cases, Pergrossi filed an objection to the omnibus Report 

and Recommendation. See No. 1:20-cv-181-MW-GRJ, ECF No. 6. Although he did 

not file that objection (or any objection) in this case, I have nonetheless considered 

de novo the issues raised in that objection. 

Case 1:20-cv-00210-AW-GRJ Document 6 Filed 10/05/20 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED on October 5, 2020. 

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-00210-AW-GRJ Document 6 Filed 10/05/20 Page 2 of 2
§ 920.12 District. *District* means the applicable one of the following described subdivisions of the production area or such other subdivision as may be prescribed pursuant to § 920.31: ( a ) *District 1* shall include Butte, Sutter, and Yuba Counties.
( b ) *District 2* shall include Tulare County.
( c ) *District 3* shall include all counties within the production area not included in Districts 1 and 2.
[75 FR 37291, June 29, 2010]
52.246-16 Responsibility for Supplies.

As prescribed in 46.316 , insert the following clause:

Responsibility for Supplies (Apr 1984)

(a) Titleto supplies furnished under this contract shall pass to the Government upon formal

acceptance, regardless of when or where the Government takes physical possession, unless the

contract specifically provides for earlier passage of title.

(b) Unless the contract specifically provides otherwise, risk of loss of or damage to supplies shall

remain with the Contractor until, and shall pass to the Government upon-

(1) Delivery of the supplies to a carrier, if transportation is f.o.b. origin; or

(2) Acceptance by the Government or delivery of the supplies to the Government at the destination

specified in the contract, whichever is later, if transportation is f.o.b. destination.

(c) Paragraph (b) of this clause shall not apply to supplies that so fail to conform to contract

requirements as to give a right of rejection. The risk of loss of or damage to such nonconforming

supplies remains with the Contractor until cure or acceptance. After cure or acceptance, paragraph

(b) of this clause shall apply.

(d) Under paragraph (b) of this clause, the Contractor shall not be liable for loss of or damage to

supplies caused by the negligence of officers, agents, or employees of the Government acting within

the scope of their employment.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.246 [Reserved]
§ 4280.25 Revolving Loan Fund Plan. Each REDG Intermediary must adopt a Rural Development-approved plan that specifies that: ( a ) The initial loan made from the Fund will be at zero percent interest and have a maximum term of 10 years;
( b ) Loans made from loan repayments may carry an interest rate less than, or equal to, the prevailing prime rate. The Intermediary determines repayment terms and security arrangements on these loans.
( c ) Loans made from repayments of REDG loans must be for eligible Program purposes;
( d ) The Intermediary is solely responsible for the financial approval of Fund loans and all other Fund decisions and actions; and
( e ) No changes will be made to a Rural Development-approved Revolving Loan Fund Plan without the prior written approval of Rural Development.
#### § 925.66 Duration of immunities.

The benefits, privileges, and immunities conferred upon any person by virtue of this part shall cease upon its termination, except with respect to acts done under and during the existence of this part.
156 So.2d 607

#### Sterling E. LITTLE and Raymond B. Hayes v. Robert G. HAIK.

No. 46910.

Oct. 10, 1963.

Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit.

154 So.2d 507.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
# Subpart 5632.4 - ADVANCE PAYMENTS FOR NONCOMMERCIAL ITEMS

*(Added June 2018)*

**Parent topic:**Part 5632 - CONTRACT FINANCING

## 5632.409-1 Recommendation for Approval.

The approving authority for advanced payments is the Director of Procurement.
Subpart 5236.2 - SPECIAL ASPECTS OF

CONTRACTING FOR CONSTRUCTION

Parent topic: Part 5236 - CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS

5236.270 Expediting construction contracts.

(a) Where additional costs are to be incurred, NAVFACENGCOM is responsible for obtaining

required agency head approval and certification.
Subpart 422.1 - Basic Labor Policies

Parent topic: PART 422 - APPLICATION OF LABOR LAWS TO GOVERNMENT ACQUISITIONS

422.103 Overtime.

422.103-4 Approvals.

Requests for the use of overtime shall be approved by an acquisition official at a level above the

contracting officer in accordance with the procedures in FAR 22.103-4 (a) and (b).
§ 905.148 Reports of special purpose shipments under certificates of privilege. ( a ) Each handler of citrus shipping under Certificates of Privilege shall supply the committee with reports on each shipment as requested by the committee, on forms supplied by the committee, showing the name and address of the shipper or shippers; name and address of the certified organic Florida citrus fruit grower or growers supplying fruit for such shipment; truck or other conveyance identification; the loading point; destination, consignee; the inspection certificate number; and any other information deemed necessary by the committee.
( b ) One copy of the report on each shipment shall be forwarded by the shipper to the committee within 10 days after such shipment, and two copies of the report shall accompany each shipment to the receiver. Upon the receipt of each shipment, the receiver shall complete the applicable portion of the form and return one copy to the committee within 10 days and one copy shall be retained by the shipper. Such completion shall contain a certification to the Secretary and the committee that the citrus described shall be distributed in the outlets described. Failure to complete and return such forms will be cause to remove that receiver's name from the committee's list of eligible receivers.
[43 FR 9456, Mar. 8, 1978, as amended at 59 FR 26929, May 25, 1994]
# Subpart 5149.1 - General Principles

**Parent topic:**Part 5149 - Termination of Contracts

## 5149.101 Authorities and responsibilities.

(b)(i)  Contracting officers should exercise the authority to terminate a contract for convenience of the Government only after full coordination with senior officials of the activity which requested establishment of the contract.

### 5149.101-90 Contracts resulting from military interdepartmental purchase requests.

Terminate contracts resulting from military interdepartmental purchase requests in accordance with DFARS 208.7004, DFARS PGI 208.7004-6 and 208.7004-7.

## 5149.102 Notice of termination.

The contracting officer shall notify the cognizant suspension and debarment official of all decisions to terminate a contractor for default.  Send the notification to the suspension and debarment official in accordance with 5109.403.  Include a copy of the contracting officer’s notice of termination for default or cause to the contractor in accordance with FAR 49.102(a).

## 5149.107 Audit of prime contract settlement proposals and subcontract settlements.

(a)  Within five calendar days after receipt from the contractor, send electronically all settlement proposals to the responsible audit office.  Include inventory and accounting information and related documents.
#### § 923.61 Compliance.

Except as provided in this part, no person shall handle cherries, the shipment of which has been prohibited by the Secretary in accordance with the provisions of this part: And no person shall handle cherries except in conformity with the provisions of this part.