alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-QSB
FOR THE FIRST QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         670,068
<SECURITIES>                                 4,732,549
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,051,891
<PP&E>                                       1,314,271
<DEPRECIATION>                               (156,435)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,942,276
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          630,411
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        36,875
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,274,990
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,942,276
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               828,750
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (828,750)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (828,750)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (828,750)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Edna Schopowitz et al., Appellants, v. Sidney B. Levitt et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of William H. Kurland et al., Respondents, v. James M. Power et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents, and Edna Schopowitz et al., Appellants. (Proceeding No. 2.)

—Consolidated proceedings as follows: *977Proceeding No. 1 is to invalidate petitions designating the following respondents as candidates in the Republican Party Primary Election to be held on June 23, 1970: Sidney B. Levitt for nomination for the public office of Member of the Assembly for the 40th Assembly District, Kings County; William H. Kurland and Fay Haieken for the Party position of Member of the State Committee, Male and Female respectively, for the 40th Assembly District, Kings County; and Pasquale DeBlasi, Jr., Maurice Brill, Irwin A. Rosenberg and Samuel Rubin for the Party position of Delegate to the Republican Judicial Convention, 2d Judicial District, for the 40th Assembly District, Kings County. Proceeding No. 2 is to validate the petitions designating said candidates for the said Party position of Member of the State Committee. The appeal is by petitioners in Proceeding No. 1, who are respondents in Proceeding No. 2, from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered June 5, 1970, which dismissed Proceeding No. 1 and granted the petition in Proceeding No. 2. Judgment affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Rabin, Acting P. J., Munder, Martuscello, Latham and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Authority:

7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 868.205 Milling requirements.

In determining milling yield (see § 868.202(f)) in rough rice, the degree of milling shall be equal to, or better than, that of the interpretive line sample for “well-milled” rice.

[42 FR 40869, Aug. 12, 1977. Redesignated at 54 FR 21413, May 18, 1989, and further redesignated and amended at 60 FR 16364, 16365, Mar. 30, 1995]
52.203-10 Price or Fee Adjustment for Illegal

or Improper Activity.

As prescribed in 3.104-9(b), insert the following clause:

Price or Fee Adjustment for Illegal or Improper Activity (May 2014)

(a) The Government, at its election, may reduce the price of a fixed-price type contract and the total

cost and fee under a cost-type contract by the amount of profit or fee determined as set forth in

paragraph (b) of this clause if the head of the contracting activity or designee determines that there

was a violation of 41 U.S.C.2102 or 2103, as implemented in section 3.104 of the Federal Acquisition

Regulation.

(b) The price or fee reduction referred to in paragraph (a) of this clause shall be-

(1) For cost-plus-fixed-fee contracts, the amount of the fee specified in the contract at the time of

award;

(2) For cost-plus-incentive-fee contracts, the target fee specified in the contract at the time of award,

notwithstanding any minimum fee or "fee floor" specified in the contract;

(3) For cost-plus-award-fee contracts-

(i) The base fee established in the contract at the time of contract award;

(ii) If no base fee is specified in the contract, 30 percent of the amount of each award fee otherwise

payable to the Contractor for each award fee evaluation period or at each award fee determination

point.

(4) For fixed-price-incentive contracts, the Government may-

(i) Reduce the contract target price and contract target profit both by an amount equal to the initial

target profit specified in the contract at the time of contract award; or

(ii) If an immediate adjustment to the contract target price and contract target profit would have a

significant adverse impact on the incentive price revision relationship under the contract, or

adversely affect the contract financing provisions, the Contracting Officer may defer such

adjustment until establishment of the total final price of the contract. The total final price

established in accordance with the incentive price revision provisions of the contract shall be

reduced by an amount equal to the initial target profit specified in the contract at the time of

contract award and such reduced price shall be the total final contract price.

(5) For firm-fixed-price contracts, by 10 percent of the initial contract price or a profit amount

determined by the Contracting Officer from records or documents in existence prior to the date of

the contract award.

(c) The Government may, at its election, reduce a prime contractor’s price or fee in accordance with

the procedures of paragraph (b) of this clause for violations of the statute by its subcontractors by

an amount not to exceed the amount of profit or fee reflected in the subcontract at the time the

subcontract was first definitively priced.
(d) In addition to the remedies in paragraphs (a) and (c) of this clause, the Government may

terminate this contract for default. The rights and remedies of the Government specified herein are

not exclusive, and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this

contract.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.203 [Reserved]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

ROSALYN KENDALL, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No.: 2:06 CV 676-ID

)

USAA INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., )

)

)

Defendant. )

PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

COMES NOW the Plaintiff, in response to the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, states and

shows as follows:

1. In light of the Defendant’s motion and Bitinas v. Roback, 2005 W.L. 327137

(D.Conn.2005), setting forth that the Defendant is a citizen of each and every state

in which it has a member, the Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court

dismiss this action without prejudice, with leave to re-file in state court.

 /s/ Lindsey O. Hill 

Richard F. Horsley (HOR023)

Lindsey O. Hill (HIL055)

Attorneys for Plaintiff

OF COUNSEL:

GOOZÉE, KING & HORSLEY

Shades Brook Bldg., Ste. 200

3300 Cahaba Road

Birmingham, Alabama 35223

(205) 871-1310

(205) 871-1370

Case 2:06-cv-00676-ID-DRB Document 9 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on September 12, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with the

clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to the

following:

W. Evans Brittain

Ball, Ball, Matthews & Novak, P.A.

P.O. Box 2148

Montgomery, Alabama 36102-2148

ebrittain@ball-ball.com

 /s/ Lindsey O. Hill 

Richard F. Horsley

Lindsey O. Hill

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Case 2:06-cv-00676-ID-DRB Document 9 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 2 of 2
52.249-14 Excusable Delays.

As prescribed in 49.505(b), insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts for supplies,

services, construction, and research and development on a fee basis whenever a cost-reimbursement

contract is contemplated. Also insert the clause in time-and-material contracts, and labor-hour

contracts. When used in construction contracts, substitute the words "completion time" for "delivery

schedule" in the last sentence of the clause.

Excusable Delays (Apr 1984)

(a) Except for defaults of subcontractors at any tier, the Contractor shall not be in default because of

any failure to perform this contract under its terms if the failure arises from causes beyond the

control and without the fault or negligence of the Contractor. Examples of these causes are (1) acts

of God or of the public enemy, (2) acts of the Government in either its sovereign or contractual

capacity, (3) fires, (4) floods, (5) epidemics, (6) quarantine restrictions, (7) strikes, (8) freight

embargoes, and (9) unusually severe weather. In each instance, the failure to perform must be

beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Contractor. "Default" includes failure

to make progress in the work so as to endanger performance.

(b) If the failure to perform is caused by the failure of a subcontractor at any tier to perform or make

progress, and if the cause of the failure was beyond the control of both the Contractor and

subcontractor, and without the fault or negligence of either, the Contractor shall not be deemed to

be in default,- unless-

(1) The subcontracted supplies or services were obtainable from other sources;

(2) The Contracting Officer ordered the Contractor in writing to purchase these supplies or services

from the other source; and

(3) The Contractor failed to comply reasonably with this order.

(c) Upon request of the Contractor, the Contracting Officer shall ascertain the facts and extent of the

failure. If the Contracting Officer determines that any failure to perform results from one or more of

the causes above, the delivery schedule shall be revised, subject to the rights of the Government

under the termination clause of this contract.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.249 [Reserved]
156 So.2d 604

#### John H. SANFORD v. Bryan CLEMMONS, Sheriff, East Baton Rouge Parish, State of Louisiana.

No. 46955.

Oct. 9, 1963.

In re: John H. Sanford applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writ refused. We find no legal basis for the exercise of a writ of habeas corpus.
Part 5611 - DESCRIBING AGENCY NEEDS

Subpart 5611.2 - USING AND MAINTAINING REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENTS

5611.274 Item identification and valuation.

5611.274-90 Item Unique Item Identification (IUID)/Unique Item Identifier (UII) and Military

Equipment Evaluation (MEV).

Subpart 5611.6 - PRIORITIES AND ALLOCATIONS

5611.602 General.

Subpart 5611.2 - USING AND MAINTAINING

REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENTS

5611.274 Item identification and valuation.

5611.274-90 Item Unique Item Identification (IUID)/Unique Item Identifier (UII) and

Military Equipment Evaluation (MEV).

(Revised December 2015)

It is USSOCOM policy that IUIDs or DOD recognized UID equivalents, shall be incorporated in

solicitations and contracts in accordance with DFARS 211.274 . DFARS clause 252.211-7003 shall be

incorporated into any solicitation and contract for procurement of tangible assets as directed by the

Program Manager in the procurement request package.

In accordance with DFARS 211.274-3, contractors shall be required to identify the Government’s

unit acquisition cost for all items delivered, even if none of the criteria for placing a unique item

identification mark applies. DFARS 252.211-7003(a) defines unit acquisition cost.

Follow procedures found in the DCG for IUID/UII and MEV.

Subpart 5611.6 - PRIORITIES AND ALLOCATIONS

5611.602 General.

(Revised Ju ne 202 1 )
(c)

(1) USSOCOM is a Delegated Agency in accordance with Schedule I of the Defense Production

Allocation System, Department of Commerce Regulation 15 CFR 700 . This delegation gives

USSOCOM the authority to place Defense Priorities and Allocations System (DPAS) rated orders in

support of authorized programs.

(2) The USSOCOM DPAS Officer is the SOF AT&L-KM Policy Chief. The DPAS Officer serves as the

focal point for all DPAS matters.

HQ, United States Special Operations Command

Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L-K)

SOFARS 5611

February 2007
§ 920.54 Special purpose shipments. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in this section, any person may, without regard to the provisions of §§ 920.41, 920.52, 920.53 and 920.55 and the regulations issued thereunder, handle kiwifruit: ( 1 ) For consumption by charitable institutions;
( 2 ) For distribution by relief agencies; or
( 3 ) For commercial processing into products.
( b ) Upon the basis of recommendations and information submitted by the committee, or from other available information, the Secretary may relieve from any or all requirements, under or established pursuant to § 920.41, § 920.52, § 920.53 or § 920.55, the handling of kiwifruit: ( 1 ) To designated market areas;
( 2 ) For such specified purposes (including shipments to facilitate the conduct of marketing research and development projects); or,
( 3 ) In such minimum quantities or types of shipments, as may be prescribed.
( c ) The committee shall, with the approval of the Secretary, prescribe such rules, regulations, and safeguards as it may deem necessary to prevent kiwifruit handled under the provisions of this section from entering the channels of trade for other than the specific purposes authorized by this section. Such rules, regulations, and safeguards may include the requirements that handlers shall file applications and receive approval from the committee for authorization to handle kiwifruit pursuant to this section, and that such applications be accompanied by a certification by the intended purchaser or receiver that the kiwifruit will not be used for any purpose not authorized by this section.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) Case No.: 2:06cr177-WHA

 )

ATOYA ALQUITA WILLIAMS )

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

COMES NOW the undersigned counsel, Donnie W. Bethel, and enters his appearance

on behalf of Defendant, Atoya Alquita Williams, in the above-styled case.

Dated this 5 day of December 2006. th

Respectfully submitted, 

s/ Donnie W. Bethel

DONNIE W. BETHEL

Assistant Federal Defender

201 Monroe Street, Suite 407

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Phone: (334) 834-2099

Fax: (334) 834-0353

E-mail:don_bethel@fd.org

IN Bar Code: 14773-49

Case 2:06-cr-00177-WHA-DRB Document 7 Filed 12/05/2006 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) Case No.: 2:06cr177-WHA

 )

ATOYA ALQUITA WILLIAMS )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on December 5, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk

of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following:

Louis V. Franklin, Esq., Assistant U. S. Attorney, One Court Square, Suite 201, Montgomery,

Alabama 36104. 

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Donnie W. Bethel

DONNIE W. BETHEL

Assistant Federal Defender

201 Monroe Street, Suite 407

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Phone: (334) 834-2099

Fax: (334) 834-0353

E-mail:don_bethel@fd.org

IN Bar Code: 14773-49

Case 2:06-cr-00177-WHA-DRB Document 7 Filed 12/05/2006 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3101 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3101

    To suspend temporarily the duty on seals, ECS door, front spar.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

 Mr. Brownback introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on seals, ECS door, front spar.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SEALS, ECS DOOR, FRONT SPAR.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.59.11        Seals, ECS door, front  Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           spar (provided for in                                             31/2009          ''
                           subheading                                                                          .
                           5911.90.00)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 76477]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30825]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel MBRS Score Grant Applications 
Review.
    Date: December 21, 2010.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, 45 
Center Drive, Room 3AN18, Bethesda, MD 20892. (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact: Lisa Dunbar, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Office of 
Scientific Review, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, 
National Institutes of Health, 45 Center Drive, Room 3AN12, 
Bethesda, MD 20892. 301-594-2849. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9bffeef5f9fae9f7dbf6faf2f7b5f5f2f3b5fcf4ed"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="eb8f9e85898a9987ab868a8287c5858283c58c849d">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, 
Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and 
Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and 
Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental 
Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, 
Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 2, 2010.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-30825 Filed 12-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3260 

To suspend temporarily the duty on plastic lamp-holder housings containing 

sockets. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 26, 2006 

Mr. FRIST (for Mrs. DOLE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on plastic lamp-holder 

housings containing sockets. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN PLASTIC LAMP-HOLDER HOUSINGS 

4 CONTAINING SOCKETS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.85.32 Plastic lamp-holder housings containing 

sockets (provided for in subheading 

8536.61.00) ............................................. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 3260 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS