alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 1 of 38
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 2 of 38
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 3 of 38
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 4 of 38
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 5 of 38
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 6 of 38
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 7 of 38
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 8 of 38
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 9 of 38
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 10 of 38
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 11 of 38
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 12 of 38
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 13 of 38
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 14 of 38
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 15 of 38
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 16 of 38
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 17 of 38
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 18 of 38
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 19 of 38
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 20 of 38
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 21 of 38
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 22 of 38
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 23 of 38
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 24 of 38
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 25 of 38
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 26 of 38
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 27 of 38
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 28 of 38
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 29 of 38
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 30 of 38
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 31 of 38
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 32 of 38
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 33 of 38
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 34 of 38
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 35 of 38
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 36 of 38
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 37 of 38
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 38 of 38
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 1-2 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 1 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 1-2 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 2 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 1-2 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 3 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 1-2 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 4 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 1-2 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 5 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 1-2 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 6 of 6
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Francisco Torres, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered November 30, 1965, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and related crimes, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Action remitted to the Criminal Term for the sole purpose of holding a hearing in accordance with the memorandum herewith and making a determination thereon. Pending such determination, the appeal will be held in abeyance. At the trial of appellant and another in September, 1965, for robbery in the first degree 'and other crimes, appellant testified, on direct examination, that he was present in Kings County at the scene and at the time of the alleged robbery. On cross-examination by the People, and over appellant’s objection that he had not received the notice prescribed by section 813-f of the Code of Criminal Procedure, appellant admitted in substance that, in a statement made by him to the People at the time of his arrest, he had said that he had not been at the scene of the robbery at the time of the crime or that he had been in Bronx County at that time. The People say that section 813-f does not apply to the People’s impeaching use of a false exculpatory statement. In our opinion, the People cannot thus circumvent the constitutional compulsion of *Jackson*v. *Denno*(378 U. S. 368) and the procedure mandated by *People*v. *Huntley*(15 N Y 2d 72), for a false exculpatory statement, usable against a defendant as an implied admission of his awareness of his guilt, may he made involuntarily (see *People*v. *Schwartz,*30 A D 2d 385). Hence, though we otherwise would affirm the judgment, we are constrained to remit this action for the holding of a *Huntley*hearing concerning the question and answer statement obtained from appellant by an Assistant District Attorney shortly after appellant’s arrest. Brennan, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Benjamin, Munder and Martuseello, JJ., concur.
§ 948.84 Termination. ( a ) The Secretary may at any time terminate any or all provisions of this subpart by giving at least one day's notice by means of a press release or in any other manner which he may determine.
( b ) The Secretary may at any time terminate or suspend the operations of any or all of the provisions of this subpart whenever he finds that such provisions do not tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act.
( c ) The Secretary shall terminate the provisions of this subpart at the end of any fiscal period whenever he finds that such termination is favored by a majority of producers, who during a representative period, as determined by the Secretary have been engaged in the production of potatoes for market: *Provided,* That such majority has, during such representative period, produced for market more than fifty percent of the volume of such potatoes produced for market.
( d ) The provisions of this subpart shall in any event terminate whenever the provisions of the Act authorizing them cease to be in effect.
[25 FR 7092, July 27, 1960, as amended at 26 FR 11483, Dec. 5, 1961. Redesignated at 26 FR 12751, Dec. 30, 1961]
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Ward Truckload Express, LLC, :

Petitioner :

:

v. : No. 2623 C.D. 2015

:

Workers' Compensation :

Appeal Board (Roy), :

Respondent :

O R D E R

NOW, October 21, 2016

, upon consideration of petitioner’s

application for rearg ument and respondent’s answer in response thereto , the

application is denied.

MARY HANNAH LEAVITT,

President Judge
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 8 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TTI INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MAY 31,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                             196
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  250,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               250,196
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 255,196
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,213
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,073,401
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   214,983
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,502
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (43,789)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (43,789)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
915.607 Criteria for acceptance and

negotiation of an unsolicited proposal.

(c) DOE's cost participation policy, at subpart 917.70, shall be followed in determining the extent to

which the DOE will participate in the cost for the proposed effort.

Parent topic: Subpart 915.6 - Unsolicited Proposals
§ 900.401 Definitions. ( a ) *Act* means Public Act No. 10, 73d Congress (48 Stat. 31), as amended, and as reenacted and amended by the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937 (50 Stat. 246), as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674).
( b ) *Secretary* means the Secretary of Agriculture of the United States, or any officer or employee of the Department to whom authority has heretofore been delegated, or to whom authority may hereafter be delegated, to act in his stead; and *Department* means the United States Department of Agriculture.
( c ) *Administrator* means the Administrator of the Agricultural Marketing Service, with power to redelegate, or any officer or employee of the Department to whom authority has been delegated or may hereafter be delegated to act in his stead.
( d ) *Order* means the marketing order (including an amendatory order) with respect to which the Secretary has directed that a referendum be conducted.
( e ) *Referendum agent* means the individual or individuals designated by the Secretary to conduct the referendum.
( f ) *Representative period* means the period designated by the Secretary pursuant to section 8c of the act (7 U.S.C. 608c).
( g ) *Person* means any individual, partnership, corporation, association, or other business unit. For the purpose of this definition, the term *partnership* includes ( 1 ) a husband and wife who have title to, or leasehold interest in, land as tenants in common, joint tenants, tenants by the entirety, or, under community property laws, as community property, and
( 2 ) so-called *joint ventures,* wherein one or more parties to the agreement, informal or otherwise, contributed capital and others contribute labor, management, equipment, or other services, or any variation of such contributions by two or more parties, so that it results in the growing of the commodity for market and the authority to transfer title to the commodity so produced.
( h ) *Producer* means any person defined as a producer in the order who: ( 1 ) Owns and farms land, resulting in his ownership of the commodity produced thereon;
( 2 ) Rents and farms land, resulting in his ownership of all or a portion of the commodity produced thereon; or
( 3 ) Owns land which he does not farm and, as rental for such land, obtains the ownership of a portion of the commodity produced thereon. Ownership of, or leasehold interest in, land and the acquisition, in any manner other than as hereinbefore set forth, of legal title to the commodity grown thereon shall not be deemed to result in such owners or lessees becoming producers.
[30 FR 15414, Dec. 15, 1965, as amended at 37 FR 8059, Apr. 25, 1972]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7638
RUSSELL D. RHYNE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus CHARLES CREECY, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-333-3-2-MU) Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 24, 1999 Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Russell D. Rhyne, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Russell Rhyne seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we denya certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Rhyne v. Creecy , No. CA-98-333- 3-2-MU (W.D.N.C. Sept. 30, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Editorial Note on Part 91
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 91 appear at 61 FR 51350, Oct. 2 1996.

§ 91.25 Certificate requirements. Certificates of analysis and other memoranda concerning laboratory service and the reporting of results should have the following requirements: ( a ) Certificates of analysis shall be on standard printed forms approved by the Deputy Administrator;
( b ) Shall be printed in English;
( c ) Shall have results typewritten, computer generated, or handwritten in ink and shall be clearly legible;
( d ) Shall show the results of laboratory tests in a uniform, accurate, and concise manner with abbreviations identified on the form;
( e ) Shall show the information required by §§ 91.26 through 91.29; and
( f ) Show only such other information and statements of fact as are provided in the instructions authorized by the Deputy Administrator.
[75 FR 17288, Apr. 6, 2010]
Part 5131 - Contract Cost Principles and

Procedures

Subpart 5131.2 - Contracts with Commercial Organizations

5131.205 Selected costs.

5131.205-6 Compensation for personal services.

Subpart 5131.2 - Contracts with Commercial Organizations

5131.205 Selected costs.

5131.205-6 Compensation for personal services.

(g)(6) Severance pay. The Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology) is

permitted to waive certain cost allowability limitations as set forth in FAR 31.205-6(g)(6). See

Appendix GG for further delegation.

(p)(4)(iii) Limitation on allowability of compensation. The Assistant Secretary of the Army

(Acquisition, Logistics and Technology) may establish exceptions as described at FAR

31.205-6(p)(4)(iii). See Appendix GG for further delegation.
<PAGE>   1


February 11, 1999


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549

RE:  First Liberty Financial Corp.
     Registration on Form S-8

We are aware that our report dated February 11, 1999 on our review of interim
financial information of First Liberty Financial Corp. and subsidiaries (the
"Company") for the three-month period ended December 31, 1998, and included in
the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter then ended is
incorporated by reference into the Company's form S-8 (File No. 33-24733).
Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, this report should not
be considered a part of the registration statement prepared or certified by us
within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



         PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Case 2:06-cv-00654-MEF-WC Document 2 Filed 08/01/2006 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA OF

NORTHERN DIVISION

MAY'S DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, )

INC., individually and as class )

representative of all those gasoline )

station owners similarly situated, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-702-MEF

)

TOTAL CONTAINMENT, INC., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

RULE 26(f) ORDER

The parties are hereby reminded of the obligation, imposed by Rule 26(f) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to confer and to develop a proposed discovery plan. 

The Rule 26(f) report containing the discovery plan shall be filed as soon as practicable

but not later than September 15, 2006.

The longstanding practice in this district is that dispositive motions shall be filed

no later than 90 days prior to the pretrial date. If the parties seek to vary from that

schedule, they should present, in the plan, specific case related reasons for the requested

variance.

This case will be set for trial before the undersigned judge during one of that

judge's regularly scheduled civil trial terms. The pretrial date is normally set within four

to six weeks of a scheduled trial term. The dates of each judge's civil trial terms are

available on the court's website located at http://almd.uscourts.gov in the civil case

Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 20 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

information section.

This court may or may not hold a scheduling conference before issuing a

scheduling order. If the court holds a scheduling conference, counsel may participate in

the scheduling conference by conference call.

The scheduling order entered by the court will follow the form of the Uniform

Scheduling Order adopted by the judges of this court. The Uniform Scheduling Order is

also available on the court's website.

The report of the parties should comply with Form 35 of the Appendix of Forms to

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

DONE this 25th day of August, 2006.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 20 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 2 of 2
G:\wpusers\LRB\Cascades-Evans-DE Ent 2210\Zurich Ins - 003\Notice of Filing Initial Disclosures.wpd

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

D E ENTERPRISES, LLC d/b/a )

CASCADES DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 3:06-CV-00692-VPM

)

ASSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, )

)

Defendants. )

PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF FILING INITIAL DISCLOSURES

Please take notice that on the 15 day of September, 2006, Initial Disclosures were served th

on all parties to this cause.

 /s/ Amy M. Hazelton 

Lee R. Benton (ASB-8421-E63L)

Amy M. Hazelton (ASB-4742-Y81M)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 15 day of September, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing th

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM-ECF system, which will send notification of such filing

to all parties requesting electronic service, and mailed a copy by United States Mail, postage prepaid

and properly addressed, as follows:

Thomas M. O’Hara 

Anne Laurie Smith 

McDOWELL KNIGHT ROEDDER & SLEDGE, L.L.C.

P. O. Box 350

Mobile, Alabama 36601

/s/ Amy M. Hazelton 

Of Counsel

Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 5 Filed 09/15/2006 Page 1 of 1
734.002-70 USAID policy.       In order for an USAID acquisition to be considered a major system acquisition it must meet the criteria of OMB Circular A–109 and FAR part 34, and must have an estimated value of $15 million or more during the first year of the contract. All major systems acquisition must be approved in advance by the M/OAA Director.    **Parent topic:** PART 734—MAJOR SYSTEM ACQUISITION
§ 701.103 Eligible losses, objective, and payments. ( a ) FSA will provide cost-share assistance to farmers and ranchers to rehabilitate farmland damaged by wind erosion, floods, hurricanes, wildfire, or other natural disasters as determined by the Deputy Administrator, and to carry out emergency water conservation measures during periods of severe drought, subject to the availability of funds and only for areas, natural disasters, and time periods approved by the Deputy Administrator.
( b ) The objective of the ECP is to make cost-share assistance available to eligible participants on eligible land for certain practices, to rehabilitate farmland damaged by floods, hurricanes, wildfire, wind erosion, or other natural disasters, and for the installation of water conservation measures during periods of severe drought.
( c ) Payments may also be made under this subpart for: ( 1 ) Emergency water conservation or water enhancement measures (including measures to assist confined livestock) during periods of severe drought; and
( 2 ) Floodplain easements for runoff and other emergency measures that the Deputy Administrator determines is necessary to safeguard life and property from floods, drought, and the products of erosion on any watershed whenever fire, flood, or other natural occurrence is causing or has caused, a sudden impairment of the watershed.
( d ) Payments under this part are subject to the availability of appropriated funds and any limitations that may otherwise be provided for by Congress.
[69 FR 10302, Mar. 4, 2004. Redesignated and amended at 75 FR 70088, Nov. 17, 2010; 84 FR 32841, July 10, 2019]
EX-10.8(b)



 Exhibit 10.8(b) 

SUMMARY OF 2017 COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS WITH NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS 

(Effective as of December 31, 2017) 

The following summarizes the compensation and benefits received by the non-employee Directors of
CryoLife as of December 31, 2017. It is intended to be a summary of compensation arrangements, and in no way is intended to provide any additional rights to any non-employee Director. 

Annual Retainer and Committee Chair Fees 

Each of the non-employee Directors of the Board of Directors of CryoLife (the “Board”)
receives an annual cash retainer of $40,000. Each committee chair also receives a fee in addition to the annual cash retainer in the amounts shown in the following table. 
  

					
	 Annual Fees For Committee Chairs
	 
	 Audit Committee
	  	$	15,000	 
	 Compensation Committee
	  	$	10,000	 
	 Corporate Governance Committee
	  	$	7,500	 
	 Compliance Committee
	  	$	7,500	 

 The Presiding Director also receives $25,000 retainer paid in cash. Currently, the Presiding Director is also
the Chairman of the Corporate Governance Committee, and he does not receive any additional compensation for his position as Chairman of that committee. CryoLife pays all cash retainers on a monthly basis. 

Each committee member, other than the Presiding Director, also receives a fee, in addition to the annual cash retainer, in the amounts shown
in the following table. 
  

					
	 Annual Fees For Committee Members
	 
	 Audit Committee
	  	$	7,500	 
	 Compensation Committee
	  	$	5,000	 
	 Corporate Governance Committee
	  	$	3,750	 
	 Compliance Committee
	  	$	3,750	 

 Restricted Stock Grants 

Non-employee Directors of CryoLife are eligible for equity grants, which are generally made in May of
each year. The annual equity portion of non-employee Director compensation for fiscal 2017 was paid in the form of a grant of 5,263 shares of restricted stock. These shares were issued following the annual
meeting of stockholders and vest on the first anniversary of issuance. The size and terms of the annual equity grant are subject to annual reevaluation by the Compensation Committee. If a Director ceases to serve as a Director as a result of death
or disability the equity grant will become fully vested on the date the Director ceases to be a member of the Board. If the Director ceases to be a member of the Board for any other reason, and their equity grant has not fully vested as of the date
of termination of Board service, the equity grant shall automatically be forfeited and cancelled as of the date of such termination of Board service. The Compensation Committee, however, has discretion under CryoLife’s Equity and Cash Incentive
Plan to cause the equity grant to fully vest for certain conditions.
#### § 932.71 Duration of immunities.

The benefits, privileges, and immunities conferred upon any person by virtue of this subpart shall cease upon the termination of this subpart, except with respect to acts done under and during the existence of this subpart.