alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2
**Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
I, Frederic T. Boyer, Chief Financial Officer of Qualstar Corporation (the“Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarterended September 30, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.   Dated: November 12, 2004   /s/ FREDERIC T. BOYER  **Frederic T. Boyer** **Chief Financial Officer**
21
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

 _______________________________

JAMES PETTY, #124 252 *

Plaintiff, *

v. * 2:06-CV-639-WKW

RAY B. FINEDOR, et al., *

Defendants. *

 _______________________________

ORDER

For good cause, it is 

ORDERED that on or before November 2, 2006, Defendant Hardy shall SHOW

CAUSE why he has failed to comply with the court’s September 13, 2006 order. 

Done, this 24 day of October 2006. th

/s/ Delores R. Boyd

DELORES R. BOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 2:06-cv-00639-WKW-TFM Document 17 Filed 10/24/2006 Page 1 of 1
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2881 

To suspend temporarily the duty on chloroacetic acid, ethyl ester. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 19, 2006 

Mr. BURR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on chloroacetic acid, ethyl 

ester. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CHLOROACETIC ACID, ETHYL ESTER. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.12.33 Chloroacetic acid, ethyl ester 

(CAS No. 105–39–5) (provided for in subheading 

2915.40.50) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•S 2881 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
Subpart 1304.2 - Contract Distribution

Parent topic: PART 1304 - ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS

1304.201 Procedures.

1304.201-70 Accountable personal property.

Provide one copy of all contracts and purchase orders for accountable personal property to the

appropriate Departmental property management office(s) for inclusion in the Department's personal

property system in accordance with the DOC Personal Property Management Manual. Accountable

personal property purchased with a Governmentwide commercial purchase card is also to be

reported to the property management office.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

November 27, 2007

NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY

 REGARDING CORPORATE/

CONFLICT STATEMENT

To: David Finney

From: Clerk’s Office

Case Style: Finney v. Nissan North America, Inc. et al

Case Number: 3:06-cv-00622-WKW

Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 7.1, and this

Court’s General Order Miscellaneous Case No. 00-3047 parties are required to file their

Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement at their initial appearance.

No corporate/conflict disclosure statement has been filed by you in this action.

This deficiency must be corrected within ten (10) days from this date. Please refer to

attachment.

Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 64 Filed 11/27/2007 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

 _______________________________

JAMES ARTHUR CULBRETH, #214 203 *

Petitioner, *

 v. * 2:06-CV-690-MEF

 

GWENDOLYN MOSLEY, WARDEN, et al., *

Respondents. *

 _______________________________

ORDER

For good cause, it is 

ORDERED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge entered August 14,

2006 (Doc. No. 5) be and is hereby WITHDRAWN.

DONE, this 15th day of September, 2006.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00690-MEF-SRW Document 10 Filed 09/15/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### § 701.33 Death, incompetency, or disappearance.

In case of death, incompetency, or disappearance of any participant, any cost-share payment due shall be paid to the successor, as determined in accordance with part 707 of this chapter.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I,Eddie Canterbury, Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer, certifythat: 

 

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Logan County BancShares, Inc.;

 

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.   The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and have:

 

(a)   Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b)   Reserved;

 

(c)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(d)   Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.   The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a)   All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: August 12, 2005 | /s/ Eddie Canterbury                            |   |
|----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                       | Eddie Canterbury, Executive Vice  President and |
|                       | Chief Executive Officer                         |

 

----
§ 917.21 Nomination of Pear Commodity Committee members. Nominations for membership on the Pear Commodity Committee shall be made by the growers of pears in the respective representation areas as follows: ( a ) North Sacramento Valley District and the Central Sacramento Valley District one nominee.
( b ) Sacramento River District, Stockton District, Stanislaus District, Contra Costa District, Santa Clara District, and Solano District four nominees.
( c ) Placer-Colfax District one nominee.
( d ) Lake District four nominees.
( e ) Mendocino District and the North Bay District one nominee.
( f ) El Dorado District one nominee.
( g ) All of the production area not included in paragraphs (a) through (f) of this section one nominee.
Effective Date Note
Effective Date Note: At 59 FR 10055, Mar. 3, 1994, § 917.21 was suspended, effective Apr. 4, 1994.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,522
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,980
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         89
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,903
<PP&E>                                           5,268
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,463
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,221
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,544
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            23
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,593
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,221
<SALES>                                          4,931
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,006
<CGS>                                            4,467
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        4
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   406
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,549
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,971
<INCOME-TAX>                                       167
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,804
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,804
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.395
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.395
        

</TABLE>
| www.nws.noaa.gov  |
|------------------------|

|  |  |   |  |
|--|--|--------|--|
|  |

|  | Site Map | News | Organization | Search   |  |
|--|----------|------|--------------|--------------------|--|

| Search the CPCAbout Us               Our Mission               Who We AreContact Us               CPC Information               CPC Web Team |  **HOME** >    Outreach >    Publications >    Atlases >    Intercomparisons     By  R. Wayne Higgins, Yu-Ping Yao, Muthuvel Chelliah, Wesley Ebisuzaki, John. E. Janowiak, Chester F. Ropelewski and Robert E. Kistler    November 1996NOAA/National Weather Service |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
of First Community Financial Corporation, (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Richard R. Leitzel, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. To my knowledge, the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                              
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: November 13, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Richard R. Leitzel       
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | Richard R. Leitzel           
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
#### § 80.2 Administration and disputes.

Administration of this part shall be under the supervision of the Deputy Administrator, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, and implemented for AMS through the Farm Service Agency (FSA) of USDA. Disputes shall be resolved by FSA by using regulations found in 7 CFR part 780.
# 5148.202 Clause for construction contracts.

The head of the contracting activity shall make the determination at FAR 48.202.  See Appendix GG for further delegation.

**Parent topic:**Subpart 5148.2 - Contract Clauses
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION III 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103 DATE: November 30, 2010 SUBJECT: Technical Support Document for Virginia’s Adoption of the Lead

Standard, Related Reference Conditions, and Upd ate of Appendices /s/ FROM: Irene Shandruk, Phy sical Scientist

Office of Air Program Planning TO: File /s/ THRU: Marily

n Powers , Acting Associate Director Office of Air Program Planning A. BACKGROUND This technical support document (TSD) evaluates the September 27, 2010 submittal of the Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision pertaining to the ambient air quality standard for lead and related reference conditions. The Clean Air Act (CAA) specifies that EPA must re
- evaluate the appropriateness of its various air qualit y standards every five ye ars . As part of the process, EPA reviewed the latest research and determined that revised standard s for lead were necessary to protect public health. EPA revised the level of the primary l ead standard to a level of 0. 15 micrograms per cubic meter (μg/m 3 ) to provide increased protection for children and other ‘‘at risk’’ populations against an array of adverse health effects , most notably neurological effects in children, which include neuro cognitive and neurobehavioral effects. The secondary

standard was also revised to a level of 0.15 μg/m 3 to afford increased protection for the environment. EPA promulgated the more stringent primary and secondary national ambient air quality standard s (N AAQS) for lead on November 12, 2008 ( 73 FR 66964 )
. B. STATE SUBMITTAL On September 27, 2010, the Commonwealth of Virginia submitted a formal revision to its SIP. The SI P revision consists of an amendment which includes the revised ambient air quality standard s for lead , and related reference conditions. Virginia = s revision incorporates the revised lead standard s into the Code of Virginia (9VAC5 Chapter 30)
. In addition, the list of appendices to 40 CFR Part 51 was updated under “D ocumentsIncorporate d by R eference ” (9VAC5
- 20 - 21).

The following are the specific provisions that are being modified or a dded :
 9VAC5 - 20 - 21: Documents Incorporated by R eference (modified) The list of appendices were updated.  9VAC5 - 30 - 1 5: Reference Conditions (modified) Th e reference conditions for lead were updated.  9VAC5 - 30 - 80 : Lead ( amended ) The revised primary

and secondary

ambient air quality

standard for lead with a level of 0.15 micrograms per cubic meter was added to this regulation. C. EPA EVALUATION Virginia’s SIP revisions for the ambient air quality standard s for lead are consistent with the Federal standard s . D. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDED AGENCY ACTION EPA approval of the SIP revision is recommended.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

JOSHUA I. HARRIS,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D17-2636

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed April 13, 2018

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Osceola County,

Jon B. Morgan, Judge.

Michael Ufferman, of Michael Ufferman Law 

Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, 

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona 

Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Joshua I. Harris appeals the postconviction court’s order summarily denying his 

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for postconviction relief. Because the 

court records attached to the denial order do not conclusively refute Harris’s claim in 

ground two of his motion, in which he argued that his trial counsel was ineffective for 

failing to call a defense witness at trial whose testimony Harris alleged would have 
2

established that he did not shoot the victim, we reverse that part of the order and remand 

for the court to either hold an evidentiary hearing on this ground or attach additional 

records to its order conclusively refuting this claim. We otherwise affirm the order without 

further discussion.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

TORPY, BERGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCOT-10-0000184 07-DEC-2010 10:23 AM

NO. SCOT-10-0000184 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ' I
KEAHOLE DEFENSE COALITION, INC., a Hawaii Nonprofit Corporation, Appellant,

vs. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION, STATE OF HAWAI ' I; HAWAII ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY, INC.; and DIVISION OF CONSUMER ADVOCACY, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND

CONSUMER AFFAIRS, STATE OF HAWAI ' I, Appellees.

APPEAL FROM THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION (DOCKET NO. 05-1-0315)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL (By: Nakayama, Acting C.J., Acoba, and Duffy, JJ., and Circuit Judge Chang, in place of Recktenwald, C.J., recused, Circuit Judge Border, assigned by reason of vacancy) It appearing that the October 28, 2010 decision and order of the Public Utilities Commission is not directly appealable to the supreme court, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appellant Keahole Defense Coalition's notices of appeal filed in the supreme court on November 27, 2010 and November 28, 2010 are dismissed without prejudice to filing a notice of appeal in the intermediate courtof appeals. See HRS §§ 269-15.5 (2007) and 641-1(a) (Supp. 2009). DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ' i, December 7, 2010. /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ James E. Duffy, Jr. /s/ Gary W.B. Chang /s/ Patrick W. Border

2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHN DAVID ROETTGEN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

D. PARAMO, Warden; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 19

- 55172

D.C. No. 3:16

- cv

- 01806

- LAB

- BGS

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 7, 2020 * *

Before: TASHIMA, BYBEE, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

John David Roettgen appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying

his post

- judgment Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 60(b) motion in his 42 U.S.C. § 198 3 action

alleging various constitutional claims

. We have jurisdicti on under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah Cty.,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

APR 13 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 55172

Or. v. ACandS, Inc ., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir. 1993)

. We affirm.

T he district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Roettgen’s post

judgment Rule 60(b) motion to vacate because Roettgen failed to demonstrate any

basis for such relief. See id. at 1263 (explaining that Rule 60(b) “provides for

reconsideration only upon a showing of (1) mistake, surprise, or excusable neglect;

(2) newly discovered evidence; (3) fraud; (4) a void judgment; (5) a satisfied or

discharged judgment; or (6) ‘extraordinary circumstances ’ which would justify

relief” (citation and internal q uotation marks omitted)).

To the extent that Roettgen attempts to challenge the district court’s

underlying dismissal , we lack jurisdiction because Roettgen d id not timely file a

notice of appeal as to the underlying judgment, or a post

- judgment motion th at

tolled the time to file a notice of appeal as to the judgment. See Fed. R. App. P.

4(a)(1)( A ); 4(a)(4)(A)(vi); Harman v. Harper , 7 F.3d 1455, 1458 (9th Cir. 1993)

( appeal from a denial of a non

- tolling Rule 60(b) motion does not bring the entire

underl ying judgment up for review ).

AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

## MAR 1 3 2014 Mr. Dou Yanwei China Household Electrical Appliance Association Room 709, Talent International Building No . 80 Guang Qumen Inner Avenue Beijing P.R.C. 100062 OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION

Re: Completeness Determination for SNAP Submission for R-290 for Self-Contained Room Air Conditioners under the End Use Category Residential and Light-Commercial Air Conditioning and Heat Pumps Dear Mr. Yanwei: Thank you for China Household Electrical Appliance Association's (CHEAA) submission to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for R-290 (propane) in air conditioning. EPA established the Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) program to implement section 612 ofthe Clean Air Act. Your submission and the additional information received October 12, 2013 have been reviewed for completeness . We find the submission to be complete for self -contained room air conditioners only under the end use category residential and light commercial air conditioning and heat pumps. Here is a summary ofinformation concerning your submission: Substitute name: R-290 Substance(s) the substitute will replace: HCFC -22 Sector: Refrigeration and Air Conditioning End use : Residential and light-commercial air conditioning and heat pumps, self-contained room air conditioners only New or retrofit usage : New equipment only Date received: April 19, 2013 Most recent update received: October 12, 2013 Status of submission: Complete Pending EPA's decision concerning the substitute's acceptability and conditions ofuse, you may now sell and import R-290 for use in the end use listed above. You may also sell, import and export equipment containing R-290 in the end use listed above. However, EPA intends to propose use conditions through a notice and comment rule making in spring 2014. Equipment that does not meet the Agency's final decision on acceptability and conditions ofuse will be

Internet Address (URL) • http//www.epa .gov Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer. Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paperconsidered non-compliant and must be removed from the market upon the effective date ofthe final rule. If you have questions about your submission, please contact me at (202) 343-9445 or vondemhagen.rebecca@epa.gov . Sincerely, Rebecca von dem Hagen Alternatives and Emissions Reduction Branch Stratospheric Protection Division