alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             219
<SECURITIES>                                       353
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,480
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (79)
<INVENTORY>                                     18,875
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,320
<PP&E>                                           9,269
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,864)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  34,123
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,238
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           125
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,910
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    34,123
<SALES>                                         19,755
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,755
<CGS>                                           13,385
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,385
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,127
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 697
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,454)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,454)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,454)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.12)
        

</TABLE>
Case 2:06-cv-00653-WHA-CSC Document 17 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 1 of 11
Case 2:06-cv-00653-WHA-CSC Document 17 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 2 of 11
Case 2:06-cv-00653-WHA-CSC Document 17 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 3 of 11
Case 2:06-cv-00653-WHA-CSC Document 17 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 4 of 11
Case 2:06-cv-00653-WHA-CSC Document 17 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 5 of 11
Case 2:06-cv-00653-WHA-CSC Document 17 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 6 of 11
Case 2:06-cv-00653-WHA-CSC Document 17 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 7 of 11
Case 2:06-cv-00653-WHA-CSC Document 17 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 8 of 11
Case 2:06-cv-00653-WHA-CSC Document 17 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 9 of 11
Case 2:06-cv-00653-WHA-CSC Document 17 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 10 of 11
Case 2:06-cv-00653-WHA-CSC Document 17 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 11 of 11
Definitions.

“Acquisition Category” or ACAT is a defense acquisition program designation. For the purposes of

NMCARS, this designation also includes “Business System Category” (BCAT) as defined in DoD

Instruction 5000.75.

“ASN(RDA) Website” is defined as https://www.secnav.navy.mil/rda/DASN-P and all accompanying

pages within the site where DON contracting policy is posted.

“Clause” is defined as language which imposes a duty on the Government or contractor and is not

directly related to the production or performance of a contract deliverable as depicted in Figure 1,

Contract Language Criteria.

“CCO" is the “Chief of the Contracting Office”. The CCO is the official who has overall responsibility

for managing the day-to-day contracting office operations and includes the principal deputy to such

official.
“DASN(P)” is the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Procurement, Office of the Assistant

Secretary of the Navy (Research, Development, and Acquisition). It also includes the Executive

Director, DASN(P), and the Navy Senior Services Manager (SSM).

“Deputy/Assistant Commander for Contracts” is the Deputy or Assistant Commander for Contracts

or the equivalent at a Systems Command, the Headquarters, NAVFACENGCOM; Deputy

Commandant for HQMC, I&L; ONR; MSC; and SSP. It also includes the principal deputy for these

officials.

“NAE” is the Navy Acquisition Executive. ASN(RDA) is the NAE.

“Navy” or "DON" is the Department of Navy including the Marine Corps, unless otherwise specified.

“NSPE” is Navy Senior Procurement Executive. ASN(RDA) is the NSPE.

“Provision” is defined as language necessary for a potential offeror to produce a conforming

proposal in response to a solicitation.

Parent topic: Subpart 5202.1 - DEFINITIONS
#### Susan Reiser, Appellant, v. Bert Reiser, Respondent.

Order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated January *4,*1967, affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. No opinion. Appeal from order of said court dated December 15, 1966 dismissed, without costs, as academic. That order was superseded by the order dated January 4, 1967, which granted appellant’s motion for reargument and adhered to the original decision. Brennan, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3310 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3310

       To suspend temporarily the duty on digital camera lenses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 26, 2006

  Mr. Schumer (for himself and Mrs. Clinton) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on digital camera lenses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DIGITAL CAMERA LENSES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.11.05        Lenses for digital      Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           cameras with focal                                                31/2009          ''
                           length between 12 mm                                                                .
                           and 24 mm inclusive,
                           greater than 16 oz.
                           in weight and not
                           exceeding 18 oz.
                           (provided for in
                           subheading
                           9002.11.90)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2952 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2952

 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain other footwear valued over 
          $20 a pair with coated or laminated textile fabrics.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 23, 2006

  Mr. Carper introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain other footwear valued over 
          $20 a pair with coated or laminated textile fabrics.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN OTHER FOOTWEAR VALUED OVER $20 A PAIR WITH COATED OR 
              LAMINATED TEXTILE FABRICS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.64.08      Footwear, other     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         than men's or                                                      31/2009
                         women's, valued
                         over $20/pair
                         designed to be
                         worn over, or in
                         lieu of, other
                         footwear as a
                         protection
                         against water,
                         oil, grease or
                         chemicals or cold
                         or inclement
                         weather where
                         such protection
                         includes
                         protection
                         against water
                         that is imparted
                         by the use of a
                         coated or
                         laminated textile
                         fabric (except
                         footwear with
                         waterproof
                         injection molded
                         bottoms, i.e.
                         comprising a
                         complete outer
                         sole and all or
                         part of the
                         upper) (provided
                         in subheading
                         6402.99.20)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 869
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 869 appear at 84 FR 45646, Aug. 30, 2019.

§ 869.8 Appeals. ( a ) Any person who is subject to an adverse determination made under the Act may appeal the determination by filing a written request with AMS at the following address: Director, Warehouse and Commodity Management Division, Fair Trade Practices Program, AMS, USDA, Stop 3601, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-3601.
( b ) Any person who believes that they have been adversely affected by a determination under this part must seek review by AMS within twenty-eight calendar days of such determination, unless provided with notice by AMS of a different deadline.
( c ) The appeal process set forth in this part is applicable to all licensees and providers under any provision of the Act, regulations or any applicable licensing agreement as follows: ( 1 ) AMS will notify the person in writing of the nature of the suspension, revocation or liquidation action;
( 2 ) The person must notify AMS of any appeal of its action within twenty-eight calendar days;
( 3 ) The appeal and request must state whether: ( i ) A hearing is requested,
( ii ) The person will appear in person at such hearing, or
( iii ) Such hearing will be held by telephone;
( 4 ) AMS will provide the person a written acknowledgment of their request to pursue an appeal;
( 5 ) When a person requests an appeal and does not request a hearing AMS will allow that person: ( i ) To submit in writing the reasons why they believe AMS's determination to be in error,
( ii ) Twenty-eight calendar days from the receipt of the acknowledgment to file any statements and documents in support of their appeal, unless provided with notice by AMS of a different deadline, and
( iii ) An additional fourteen calendar days to respond to any new issues raised by AMS in response to the person's initial submission, unless provided with notice by AMS of a different deadline;
( 6 ) If the person requests to pursue an appeal and requests a hearing, AMS will: ( i ) Notify the person of the date of the hearing,
( ii ) Determine the location of the hearing, when the person asks to appear in person,
( iii ) Notify the person of the location of the hearing,
( iv ) Afford the person twenty-eight calendar days from the receipt of the notification of the scheduling of the hearing to submit any statements and documents in support of the appeal, unless provided with notice by AMS of a different deadline, and
( v ) Allow the person an additional fourteen calendar days from the date of the hearing to submit any additional material, unless provided with notice by AMS of a different deadline;
( 7 ) Determinations of AMS will be final and no further appeal within USDA will be available except as may be specified in the final determination of AMS; and
( 8 ) A person may not initiate an action in any court of competent jurisdiction concerning a determination made under the Act prior to the exhaustion of the appeal process set forth in this section.
[67 FR 50783, Aug. 5, 2002. Redesignated and amended at 84 FR 45645, 45646 Aug. 30, 2019]
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended March 31,
2009 of Nexgen Petroleum Corp., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual
Report”), I, Hsien Loong Wong, President, CEO, CFO, Secretary, Treasurer and a
director of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
    and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.





Dated:
      July 14, 2009
              /s/ Hsien Loong WongHsien
      Loong Wong, President, CEO,
                CFO,
      Secretary, Treasurer and Director
                (Principal
      Financial Officer)
PART 709—CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS

Authority: Sec. 621, Pub. L. 87–195, 75 Stat. 445, (22 U.S.C. 2381) as amended; E.O. 12163, Sept.

29, 1979, 44 FR 56673; 3 CFR, 1979 Comp., p. 435.

Subpart 709.4—Debarment, Suspension and Ineligibility

709.403 Definitions.

Subpart 709.5—Organizational Conflicts of Interest

709.503 Waiver.

709.507-2 Contract clause.

Parent topic: SUBCHAPTER B—ACQUISITION PLANNING

Subpart 709.4—Debarment, Suspension and Ineligibility

709.403 Definitions.

Debarring official in USAID is the Assistant Administrator, Bureau for Management, or designee as

delegated in Agency policy found in ADS 103—Delegations of Authority.

Suspending official in USAID is the Assistant Administrator, Bureau for Management, or designee as

delegated in Agency policy found in ADS 103—Delegations of Authority.

Subpart 709.5—Organizational Conflicts of Interest

709.503 Waiver.

For purposes of approving waivers or further delegating the authority to approve waivers pursuant

to (48 CFR) FAR 9.503, the M/OAA Director is the agency head (see (48 CFR) AIDAR 701.601(a)(1)).

The M/OAA Director hereby delegates the authority to approve waivers pursuant to (48 CFR) FAR

9.503 to the heads of USAID contracting activities, as defined in (48 CFR) AIDAR 702.170.

709.507-2 Contract clause.

(a)–(b) [Reserved]

(c) In order to avoid problems from organizational conflicts of interest that may be discovered after

award of a contract, the clause found at 752.209–71 shall be inserted in all contracts whenever the

solicitation or resulting contract or both include a provision in accordance with (48 CFR) FAR

9.507–1, or a clause in accordance with (48 CFR) FAR 9.507–2, establishing a restraint on the

contractor's eligibility for future contracts.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Larry De Berry, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered January 6, 1978, convicting him of rape in the first and second degrees, sodomy in the first and second degrees and endangering the welfare of a child, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence as a second felony offender. Case remitted to Criminal Term for a hearing in accordance herewith and appeal held in abeyance in the interim. Criminal Term is to file its report with all convenient speed. At the sentencing proceedings following his conviction, defendant was arraigned on a "prior offense information” arising out of a 1962 conviction, by plea of guilty, to robbery in the second degree, for which defendant had served more than 10 years in prison. Defendant contended that the documents submitted to prove that conviction were all forgeries, asserted that he was never advised of his right to a trial by jury when he pleaded guilty in 1962, and claimed that his counsel was ineffective because he never filed a notice of appeal from that judgment of conviction. The minutes of those proceedings were not submitted to the court. The sentencing court conducted a hearing on the question of whether defendant was the same person who was convicted of the prior offense, and properly refused to entertain defendant’s contention that the prior conviction was "unconstitutionally obtained” because his attorney allegedly neglected to file a notice of appeal (see *People v Luciano,*46 NY2d 767, 769). However, pursuant to CPL 400.21, the court should have required proof that defendant was advised of his right to a trial by jury when he pleaded guilty in 1962 (see *People v Brown,*67 AD2d 949; see, also, *People v Owens,*58 AD2d 587). Therefore, we remit to Criminal Term for a hearing on that question. Titone, J. P,, Mangano, Rabin and Gibbons, JJ., concur.
§ 927.42 Accounting. ( a ) If, at the end of a fiscal period, the assessments collected are in excess of expenses incurred, the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee may carryover such excess into subsequent fiscal periods as a reserve: *Provided,* That funds already in the reserve do not exceed approximately one fiscal period's expenses. Such reserve may be used to cover any expense authorized under this part and to cover necessary expenses of liquidation in the event of termination of this part. Any such excess not retained in a reserve or applied to any outstanding obligation of the person from whom it was collected shall be refunded proportionately to the persons from whom it was collected. Upon termination of this part, any funds not required to defray the necessary expenses of liquidation shall be disposed of in such manner as the Secretary may determine to be appropriate: *Provided,* That to the extent practical, such funds shall be returned pro rata to the persons from whom such funds were collected.
( b ) All funds received pursuant to the provisions of this part shall be used solely for the purpose specified in this part and shall be accounted for in the manner provided in this part. The Secretary may at any time require the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee and its members to account for all receipts and disbursements.
#### § 906.24 Failure to nominate.

If nominations are not made within the time and in the manner specified in § 906.23, the Secretary may, without regard to nominations, select the committee members and alternates, which selection shall be on the basis of the representation provided for in §§ 906.20 through 906.22, inclusive.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

SCOTT ROMAN

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D 2 02 2

- 1911

[ March 21, 2024 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County; Barbara R. Duffy, Judge; L.T. Case No. 15

- 11251CF10A.

H. Dohn Williams Jr., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard Valuntas,

Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY

, F ORST and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with this Annual Report of Solar Acquisition Corp., on Form 10-K for
the year ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter Klamka, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:




(1) Such
Annual Report on form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ending
December 31, 2008 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of Solar Acquisition Corp.










Dated:March
      31, 2009
                    By:
                    /s/ Peter
      KlamkaPeter
      KlamkaChairman,
      President and Chief Executive Officer
                      (Principal
      Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
732.406-74 Revocation of the LOC.       If during the term of the contract M/CFO/CMP believes that the LOC should be revoked, M/CFO/CMP may, after consultation with the cognizant contracting officer(s) and GC, revoke the LOC by written notification to the contractor. A copy of any such revocation notice will immediately be provided to the cognizant contracting officer(s).    **Parent topic:** Subpart 732.4—Advance Payments for Non-Commercial Items