alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 00654

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 00654\00654_Checklist.XLS EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

00654\00654_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

00654\00654_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 00654\00654_Part A.XLS Plant submitted survey file

x 00654\00654_Part B.XLS Plant submitted survey file

x 00654\00654_Part C.XLS Plant submitted survey file

x 00654\00654_Part D.XLS Plant submitted survey file

x 00654\00654_Part H.XLS Plant submitted survey file

00654\Certification Statement Plant ID 00654.pdf Plant certification statement

00654\Supplemental Documents\00654_Part C Watson Unit 4 Block Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

00654\Supplemental Documents\00654_Part C Watson Unit 5 Block Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00654\Supplemental Documents\00654_Plant Watson ICR Section D Drawing D-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00654\Supplemental Documents\00654_Plant Watson ICR Section D Drawing D-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00654\Supplemental Documents\00654_Plant Watson-NPDES Flow WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

00654\Supplemental Documents\00654_Watson Map 2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

00654\Supplemental Documents\00654_Watson Map1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

00654\Supplemental Documents\00654_ICR CoverLetter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
LEGAL02/30054243v1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

ROBERT D. BROOKS and ALICE 

BRADLEY,

)

)

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

)

Civil Action No. 2:06-CV-680-LESCSC

v. )

)

)

)

PACTIV CORPORATION and 

LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORPORATION

)

)

)

Defendants. )

)

CONSENT ORDER ENLARGING TIME

TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

With the express consent and agreement of counsel for Plaintiffs, Defendant 

Pactiv Corporation and Defendant Louisiana-Pacific Corporation; and

It appearing that the period of time within which Defendants may answer, plead, 

move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint has not yet expired;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, in accordance with Rule 6(b) of the Federal Rules of 

Civil Procedure, that the time within which Defendants may answer, plead, move, or 

otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint be enlarged through and including September 

25, 2006. 

This ____ day of _____________, 2006.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:06-cv-00660-LES-CSC Document 8 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### § 923.20 Establishment and membership.

There is hereby established a Washington Cherry Marketing Committee consisting of sixteen members, each of whom shall have an alternate who shall have the same qualifications as the member for whom he is an alternate. Ten of the members and their respective alternates shall be growers or officers or employees of corporate growers. Six of the members and their respective alternates shall be handlers, or officers or employees of handlers. The ten members of the committee who are growers or employees or officers of corporate growers are referred to in this part as “grower members” of the committee; and the six members of the committee who shall be handlers, or officers or employees of handlers, are referred to in this part as “handler members” of the committee. Five of the grower members and their respective alternates shall be producers of cherries in District 1, and five of the grower members and their respective alternates shall be producers of cherries in District 2. Three of the handler members and their respective alternates shall be handlers of cherries in District 1, and three of the handler members and their respective alternates shall be handlers of cherries in District 2.

[22 FR 3835, June 1, 1957. Redesignated at 26 FR 12751, Dec. 30, 1961, as amended at 66 FR 58356, Nov. 21, 2001]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3159 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3159

          To suspend temporarily the duty on gibberellic acid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

   Mr. Obama introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on gibberellic acid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON GIBBERELLIC ACID.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.28.32        Gibberellic acid (GA3)  Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           and Gibberellins (GA4                                             31/2009          ''
                           +GA7) (CAS No. 77-06-                                                               .
                           5) (provided for in
                           subheading
                           2932.29.50)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Third Department,

September, 1980

(September 2, 1980)

#### In the Matter of Marie B. Bush, Respondent, v George D. Salerno et al., Constituting the New York State Board of Elections, Respondents, and George R. Arney, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court at a Trial Term, entered September 2, 1980 in Albany County, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to section 16-102 of the Election Law, seeking to declare invalid the designating petition designating appellant as a candidate of the Republican Party for the office of State Senator from the 52nd Senate District in the September 9, 1980 primary election. Judgment affirmed, without costs, on the opinion of Mr. Justice Leonard A. Weiss at a Trial Term. Greenblott, J. P., Staley, Jr., Main, Mikoll and Casey, JJ., concur.
Case 2:06-cv-00701-ID-CSC Document 28 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00701-ID-CSC Document 28 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00650-MEF-SRW Document 9 Filed 09/25/2006 Page 1 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00650-MEF-SRW Document 9 Filed 09/25/2006 Page 2 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00650-MEF-SRW Document 9 Filed 09/25/2006 Page 3 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00650-MEF-SRW Document 9 Filed 09/25/2006 Page 4 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00650-MEF-SRW Document 9 Filed 09/25/2006 Page 5 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00650-MEF-SRW Document 9 Filed 09/25/2006 Page 6 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00650-MEF-SRW Document 9 Filed 09/25/2006 Page 7 of 7
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF SYNTELLECT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF MARCH 31,
1997, AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS OF SYNTELLECT, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,648
<SECURITIES>                                     3,145
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,638
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,182
<INVENTORY>                                      3,537
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,311
<PP&E>                                          25,959
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,717
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  34,394
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,799
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           135
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,067
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    34,394
<SALES>                                          8,726
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,871
<CGS>                                            4,531
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,225
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,591
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    80
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  33
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    110
<INCOME-TAX>                                         4
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                106
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       106
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
§ 97.302 Decision by the Secretary. ( a ) The Secretary, after receiving the advice of the Board, may affirm or reverse the decision of the Commissioner, in whole or in part.
( b ) Should the decision of the Secretary include an explicit statement that a certificate be allowed, based on an amended application, the applicant shall have the right to amend his or her application in conformity with such statement and such decision shall be binding on the Commissioner.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 76522]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30885]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 5 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Missouri, 
Oklahoma, and Texas)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 5 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, 
ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, January 11, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia Robb at 1-888-912-1227 or 
414-231-2360.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Area 5 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Tuesday, January 11, 2011, at 11 a.m. Central Time via telephone 
conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, 
notification of intent to participate must be made with Patricia Robb. 
For more information please contact Ms. Robb at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-
231-2360, or write TAP Office Stop 1006MIL, 211 West Wisconsin Avenue, 
Milwaukee, WI 53203-2221, or post comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: December 3, 2010
Shawn F. Collins,
Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2010-30885 Filed 12-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
From: Lois Starkey [mailto:Lois.Starkey@mfghome.org] 

Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 9:27 AM

To: Jensen, Michael

Cc: 'Emanuel Levy'

Subject: EESI Briefiing

Good Morning Mike:

Below please find a link to the briefing we participated in last week hosted by the Environmental and 

Energy Study Institute. I am particularly interested in sharing the presentation by Emanuel Levy, as it 

succinctly demonstrates the dilemma we face in trying to balance the 2012 IECC standards with 

affordability.

Emanuel and I I would really like the opportunity to meet with you and your team to discuss this in 

further detail. 

Let me know if you think this would be helpful.

Best Regards,

Lois

http://www.eesi.org/sustainable-and-affordable-new-options-factory-built-housing-19-jan-2011

I 

Lois Starkey, Vice President, Regulatory Affairs

2111 Wilson Blvd., Suite 100, Arlington, VA 22201

Tel: 703-558-0654

www.manufacturedhousing.org

lstarkey@mfghome.org

2011 National Congress & Expo for Manufactured and Modular Housing 

April 26-28, Caesars Palace, Las Vegas 

Online Registration Now Open at www.congressandexpo.com

2011Legislative Meeting and Winter Conference

Washington, DC - March 13-15, 2011

Online Registration Now Open at http://www.manufacturedhousing.org/calendar/Winter_Meeting_form2011.asp

2011 Annual Meeting 

Phoenix, AZ - October 2 - 4, 2011

Save the date!
Part 5202 - DEFINITIONS OF WORDS AND

TERMS

Subpart 5202.1 - DEFINITIONS

Definitions.

Subpart 5202.1 - DEFINITIONS

Definitions.

“Acquisition Category” or ACAT is a defense acquisition program designation. For the purposes of

NMCARS, this designation also includes “Business System Category” (BCAT) as defined in DoD

Instruction 5000.75.

“ASN(RDA) Website” is defined as https://www.secnav.navy.mil/rda/DASN-P and all accompanying

pages within the site where DON contracting policy is posted.

“Clause” is defined as language which imposes a duty on the Government or contractor and is not

directly related to the production or performance of a contract deliverable as depicted in Figure 1,

Contract Language Criteria.
“CCO" is the “Chief of the Contracting Office”. The CCO is the official who has overall responsibility

for managing the day-to-day contracting office operations and includes the principal deputy to such

official.

“DASN(P)” is the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Procurement, Office of the Assistant

Secretary of the Navy (Research, Development, and Acquisition). It also includes the Executive

Director, DASN(P), and the Navy Senior Services Manager (SSM).

“Deputy/Assistant Commander for Contracts” is the Deputy or Assistant Commander for Contracts

or the equivalent at a Systems Command, the Headquarters, NAVFACENGCOM; Deputy

Commandant for HQMC, I&L; ONR; MSC; and SSP. It also includes the principal deputy for these

officials.

“NAE” is the Navy Acquisition Executive. ASN(RDA) is the NAE.

“Navy” or "DON" is the Department of Navy including the Marine Corps, unless otherwise specified.

“NSPE” is Navy Senior Procurement Executive. ASN(RDA) is the NSPE.
“Provision” is defined as language necessary for a potential offeror to produce a conforming

proposal in response to a solicitation.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

WILLIE MCNAIR, ) 

 ) 

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, ) 

) 

v. ) Case No. 2:06-cv-695-WKW 

 ) 

RICHARD ALLEN, et al., ) 

) 

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. ) 

___________________________________ 

 ) 

JAMES CALLAHAN, ) 

 ) 

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Case No. 2:06-cv-919-WKW 

 ) 

RICHARD ALLEN, et al., ) 

) 

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. ) 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of this court and all parties of record: 

 Enter the undersigned’s appearance as counsel in this case for Plaintiff James Callahan. 

The undersigned is admitted pro hac vice in this action, previously representing only Plaintiff 

McNair. 

Date: November 8, 2007 /s/ Heather K. McDevitt 

HEATHER K. MCDEVITT 

Bar Number (SDNY): HM9973 

Counsel for Plaintiffs 

White & Case LLP 

1155 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, NY 10036 

Telephone: (212) 819-8200 

Facsimile: (212) 354-8113 

hmcdevitt@whitecase.com

Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 137-2 Filed 11/08/2007 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on November 8, 2007, a copy of the foregoing was filed electronically with 

the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to 

the following: J. Clayton Crenshaw, James W. Davis, Corey Maze and Jasper Roberts. 

/s/ Peter B. Patterson, Jr. 

Peter B. Patterson, Jr. 

White & Case LLP 

1155 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, NY 10036 

Telephone: (212) 819-8200 

Facsimile: (212) 354-8113 

 ppatterson@whitecase.com

Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 137-2 Filed 11/08/2007 Page 2 of 2
Subpart 5243.2 - CHANGE ORDERS

Parent topic: Part 5243 - CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS

5243.201 General.

(S-90) (a) Each undefinitized change order shall include a not-to-exceed price unless the CCO waives

this requirement.

(b) The policies and procedures of DFARS 217.74 shall be applied to change orders (except value

engineering change proposals (VECPs)) to the maximum extent practicable.

(c) The use of VECPs are encouraged due to the potential savings and system improvements that

may be realized.

(1) Prompt action shall be taken to implement those VECPs deemed to be technically sound.

(2) When considering VECPs, contracting officers shall consider the impact on the projected savings

that the normal negotiation and definitization process would have versus use of an unpriced change

order. Unpriced contract modifications that implement VECPs shall:

(i) Define minimum unit cost savings, and

(ii) Define maximum development/implementation costs

5243.204 Administration.

5243.204-70 Definitization of change orders.

5243.204-70-1 Scope.

(b) Submit the required contracting officer notice to DASN(P) by email at

usn.pentagon.asstsecnavrdadc.mbx.pabt@us.navy.mil with the subject “[Activity Name] Contracting

Officer Notice pursuant to DFARS 243.204-70-1—FMS/SAP Unpriced Change Orders.”

5243.204-70-7 Plans and Reports.

See 5217.7405 for reporting requirements.
Certification
         I, Susan Mills, certify that:

          1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all
reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the
period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Citigroup Mortgage
Loan Trust 2006-AMC1 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

          2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic
reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;

          3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution,
servicing and other information required to be provided under
Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in
the Exchange Act periodic reports;

          4.   Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance
statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation
AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic
reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the
servicing agreement; and

          5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance
with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their
related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with
servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be
included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of
Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been
included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of
noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
this report on Form 10-K.

         In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably
relied on information provided to me by the following
unaffiliated parties: Ameriquest Mortgage Company and Citibank,
N.A.

                                   Date March 30, 2007
                                   CITIGROUP MORTGAGE LOAN
                                   TRUST INC.

                                   By: /s/ Susan Mills
                                   ------------------------
                                   Name: Susan Mills
                                   Title: Vice President
                                   Date: March 30, 2007
Federal Air Quality Control Regions, EPA, 1972 (This document can be viewed at: 

http://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyNET.exe/P10053PA.TXT?ZyActionD=ZyDocument&Client=EPA&Index=Prior+to+19

76&Docs=&Query=&Time=&EndTime=&SearchMethod=1&TocRestrict=n&Toc=&TocEntry=&QField=&QField

Year=&QFieldMonth=&QFieldDay=&IntQFieldOp=0&ExtQFieldOp=0&XmlQuery=&File=D%3A%5Czyfiles%5

CIndex%20Data%5C70thru75%5CTxt%5C00000006%5CP10053PA.txt&User=ANONYMOUS&Password=anony

mous&SortMethod=h%7C-

&MaximumDocuments=1&FuzzyDegree=0&ImageQuality=r75g8/r75g8/x150y150g16/i425&Display=p%7Cf&De

fSeekPage=x&SearchBack=ZyActionL&Back=ZyActionS&BackDesc=Results%20page&MaximumPages=1&ZyE

ntry=1&SeekPage=x&ZyPURL
# L_2015047DE.01003401.xml

| 20.2.2015 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 47/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2015

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 47/34

---

Berichtigung der Richtlinie 2014/17/ЕU des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 4. Februar 2014 über Wohnimmobilienkreditverträge für Verbraucher und zur Änderung der Richtlinien 2008/48/EG und 2013/36/EU und der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1093/2010

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 60 vom 28. Februar 2014
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 60 vom 28. Februar 2014

Auf Seite 71, Anhang I, Nummer 1, Anmerkung d, Satz 1:

anstatt:

„Das Rechenergebnis wird auf eine Dezimalstelle genau angegeben.“

muss es heißen:

„Das Rechenergebnis wird auf mindestens eine Dezimalstelle genau angegeben.“

Auf Seite 79, Anhang II, Teil B, Abschnitt „2 Kreditvermittler“, Nummer 3:

anstatt:

| „(3) | Der Kreditgeber unterrichtet unter Verwendung der Formulierungen in Teil A den Verbraucher ...“ |
| --- | --- |

„(3)

Der Kreditgeber unterrichtet unter Verwendung der Formulierungen in Teil A den Verbraucher ...“

muss es heißen:

| „(3) | Der Kreditvermittler unterrichtet unter Verwendung der Formulierungen in Teil A den Verbraucher ...“ |
| --- | --- |

„(3)

Der Kreditvermittler unterrichtet unter Verwendung der Formulierungen in Teil A den Verbraucher ...“

.

Auf Seite 77, Anhang II, Muster für das ESIS-Merkblatt, 10. Flexible Merkmale, Absätze 1 und 2:

anstatt:

„(falls zutreffend) [Information über Übertragbarkeit/Abtretung] Sie können den Kredit auf [einen anderen Kreditnehmer] [oder] [eine andere Immobilie] übertragen. [Bedingungen]

(falls zutreffend) Sie können den Kredit nicht auf [einen anderen Kreditnehmer] [oder] [eine andere Immobilie] übertragen.“

muss es heißen:

„(falls zutreffend) [Information über Übertragbarkeit/Abtretung] Sie können den Kredit auf [einen anderen Kreditgeber] [oder] [eine andere Immobilie] übertragen. [Bedingungen]

(falls zutreffend) Sie können den Kredit nicht auf [einen anderen Kreditgeber] [oder] [eine andere Immobilie] übertragen.“

---