alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3135 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3135

To suspend temporarily the duty on 40-piece carbide router bit set for 
                              woodworking.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

 Mr. Chambliss introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on 40-piece carbide router bit set for 
                              woodworking.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 40-PIECE CARBIDE ROUTER BIT SET FOR WOODWORKING.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.82.07        40-piece carbide        Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           router bit set for                                                31/2009          ''
                           woodworking (provided                                                               .
                           for in subheading
                           8207.70.30)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
156 So.2d 602

#### Marshall SOILEAU v. The TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 46894.

Oct. 9, 1963.

In re: Marshall Soileau applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, ’ Third Circuit, Parish of Evangeline. 154 So.2d 463.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal there appears no error of law in its judgment.
§ 769.108 Security requirements for HFIL loans and the ultimate recipients. ( a ) *HFIL loans.* Security for all loans to intermediaries must be such that the repayment of the loan is reasonably assured, taking into consideration the intermediary's financial condition, Intermediary Relending Agreement, and management ability. The intermediary is responsible to make loans to ultimate recipients in such a manner that will fully protect the interest of the intermediary and the Government. The Agency will require adequate security, as determined by the Agency, to fully secure the loan, including but not limited to the following: ( 1 ) Assignments of assessments, taxes, levies, or other sources of revenue as authorized by law;
( 2 ) Investments and deposits of the intermediary; and
( 3 ) Capital assets or other property of the intermediary and its members.
( b ) *Liens.* In addition to normal security documents, a first lien interest in the intermediary's revolving fund account will be accomplished by a control agreement satisfactory to the Agency. The control agreement does not require the Agency's signature for withdrawals. The depository bank must waive its offset and recoupment rights against the depository account to the Agency and subordinate any liens it may have against the HFIL depository bank account.
( c ) *Ultimate recipient.* Security for a loan from an intermediary lender's HFIL revolving fund to an ultimate recipient will be adequate to fully secure the loan as specified in the relending agreement. ( 1 ) The Agency will only require concurrence in the intermediary lender's security requirement for a specific loan when security for the loan from the intermediary lender to the ultimate recipient will also serve as security for an Agency loan.
( 2 ) The ultimate recipient will take appropriate action to obtain and provide security for the loan.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3338 

To suspend temporarily the duty on polyethylene glycol branched-nonylphenyl 

ether phosphate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 26, 2006 

Mr. SPECTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on polyethylene glycol 

branched-nonylphenyl ether phosphate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL BRANCHED4 NONYLPHENYL ETHER PHOSPHATE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.34.02 Polyethylene glycol branched-nonylphenyl 

ether phosphate (CAS No. 68412–53–3) 

(provided for in subheading 3402.11.40) Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•S 3338 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

In the Matter of: SKYWEST AIRLINES, INC. 

FDMS No. FAA-2013-0292 

Served: June 24, 2015 

EXTENSION OF TIME 

Complainant Federal Aviation Administration (Complainant) filed a notice of 

appeal in this matter from the written initial decision issued on May 29, 2015. 

Complainant is required to perfect its appeal by filing an appeal brief within 55 days from 

the date of issuance ofthe initial decision under 14 C.F.R. §§ 13.233(c) and 13.2ll(e). 

Accordingly, Complainant's appeal brief is due on July 23,2015. 

By request dated June 19,2015, Complainant's counsel has requested a 30-day 

extension of time in which to file the appeal brief. Complainant's counsel represents that 

opposing counsel has agreed to this request. 

Complainant's request for an extension of time in which to file its appeal brief is 

granted under 14 C.F.R. § 13.233(c)(l). Complainant's appeal brief is now due to be 

filed on or before August 24, 2015. 1 

MICHAEL P. HUERTA 

ADMINISTRATOR 

Federal Aviation Administration 

t~'i VICKI S. LEEMON2 

~ Manager, Adjudication Branch 

1 The "mailing rule" (14 C.F.R. § 13.2ll(e)), which provides for 5 additional days after service 

by mail, does not apply to this extension. 

2 Issued under authority delegated to the Chief Counsel and the Assistant Chief Counsel for 

Litigation by Memorandum dated October 27, 1992, under 49 U.S.C. § 322(b) and 14 C.P.R. 

§ 13.202 (see 57 Fed. Reg. 58,280 (1992)) and redelegated by the Assistant Chief Counsel for 

Litigation to the Manager, Adjudication Branch, by Memorandum dated August 6, 1993.
# L_2014265EN.01003201.xml

| 5.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 265/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 265/32

---

Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 528/2014 of 12 March 2014 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards for non-delta risk of options in the standardised market risk approach

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 148 of 20 May 2014
  )

On page 31, Article 3(1)(b)(i):

for:

‘... according to of Part Three, ...’,

read:

‘... according to Part Three, ...’;

on page 33, Article 7, second paragraph:

for:

‘For the purposes of point (c), ...’,

read:

‘For the purposes of point (b), ...’;

on page 35, Annex I:

for:

‘Gamma impact = ^ × Gamma × VU2
  ’,

read:

‘Gamma impact =
  Formula
  × Gamma × VU2
  ’;

on page 35, Annex II, point (a):

for:

‘... relevant scenario determined in step (c) of Article 8.2;’,

read:

‘... relevant scenario determined in step (c) of Article 9;’;

on page 35, Annex II, point (b)(ii):

for:

‘... relevant scenario determined in step (c) of Article 8.2.’,

read:

‘... relevant scenario determined in step (c) of Article 9.’.

---
Exhibit 32.2




Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Global Health Ventures Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended May 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Audrey Lew, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:


/s/ Audrey Lew


Audrey Lew


Chief Financial Officer




February 8, 2011
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

________________________ DIVISION

_________________________________, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. __________________

)

_________________________________, )

)

Defendants, )

CONFLICT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

COMES NOW ___________________, a in the above-captioned

matter, and in accordance with the order of this Court, making the following disclosure

concerning parent companies, subsidiaries, partners, limited liability entity members and

managers, trustees (but not trust beneficiaries), affiliates, or similar entities reportable under

the provisions of the Middle District of Alabama’s General Order No. 3047:

This party is an individual, or

This party is a governmental entity, or

There are no entities to be reported, or

The following entities and their relationship to the party are hereby reported:

Reportable Entity Relationship to Party

________________________________ _________________________________

________________________________ _________________________________

________________________________ _________________________________

________________________________ _________________________________

 

Date (Signature)

 

(Counsel’s Name)

 

Counsel for (print names of all parties)

 

Address, City, State Zip Code

 

Telephone Number

Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 37 Filed 12/07/2007 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

________________________ DIVISION

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I,____________________________________, do hereby Certify that a true and correct copy

of the foregoing has been furnished by ___________________________(manner of service,

i.e., U.S. Mail, electronic mail, etc.) on this _______day of ____________ 20__, to:

 

 

 

Date Signature

Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 37 Filed 12/07/2007 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.2
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  I, J’Amy Owens, Chief Financial Officer of Bill the Butcher, Inc. (“Bill the Butcher”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Bill the Butcher on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Bill the Butcher.
 
 By:

/s/    J’Amy OwensName:

J’Amy OwensTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
  Date: December 10, 2010
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Bill the Butcher and will be retained by Bill the Butcher and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
  This certification accompanies each periodic report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Bill the Butcher for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
March 12 , 2015

Mr. Brett Kanda

Rogue Vision, LLC

4600 Polaris Avenue

Las Vegas

, NV 89103

Dear Mr. Kanda :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can

n o t Process Your Request

We entered your February 18

, 2015 , exemption request of behalf of Rogue Vision

, LLC

into the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

- 0393 ) , but we are unable to process your request any

further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy

enclosed). For us to con sider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of

the relief you seek.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additio nal information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

W hat You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) require s you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Nia Daniels

Program Analyst , Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
#### § 925.51 Recommendation for regulation.

Upon complying with the requirements of § 925.50 the committee may recommend regulations to the Secretary whenever the committee deems that such regulations as are provided in § 925.52 will tend to effectuate the declared policy of the act.
PART 13 –– SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES       SUBPART 13.1 – PROCEDURES                                                         13.106-3 Award and documentation.                                                                             SUBPART 13.2 – ACTIONS AT OR BELOW THE MICRO–PURCHASE THRESHOLD                                                         213.270 Use of the Governmentwide commercial purchase card.                                                                             SUBPART 13.3 –– SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION METHODS                                                         13.301 Government–wide commercial purchase card.    SUBPART 13.1 – PROCEDURES     13.106-3 Award and documentation.    (S-90) *Documenting the Basis for Award - Inquiry/Quote/Order (I/Q/O) Process*. An I/Q/O Price Negotiation Memorandum (PNM) for Communication Service Authorizations (CSA) shall be prepared for all I/Q/O contracting actions (excluding administrative modifications) and included in the official contract file. This I/Q/O PNM is applicable for use on telecommunication services and equipment accomplished using the I/Q/O process or the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Allied Long Lines Agency (ALLA)/National Allied Long Lines Agency (NALLA) circuit demand process under the threshold at FAR 13.500(a). The I/Q/O PNM located at DARS PG             I 13.106-3(S-90) fulfills the documentation requirements in FAR 13.106-3 and provides the determination of fair and reasonable pricing.SUBPART 13.2 – ACTIONS AT OR BELOW THE MICRO–PURCHASE THRESHOLD     213.270 Use of the Governmentwide commercial purchase card.    (b)(2) HCOs are delegated the authority to make the written determination.SUBPART 13.3 –– SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION METHODS     13.301 Government–wide commercial purchase card.    (b) References: Government-wide Commercial Purchase Card Policy and Procedures.       (S-90) Using the Government-wide commercial purchase card to acquire and pay for supplies and services does not "exempt" DISA from the Economy Act. See FAR/DFARS Subpart 17.5 for Economy Act applicability.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.53


Non-Employee Director Compensation


The non-employee directors (the “non-employee directors”) of Envision Healthcare Corporation (the “Company”) are entitled to receive the following annual compensation for service on the Company’s Board of Directors and its committees:
	
							
	Director Compensation
	 
	Board Service
	 
	Committee Chair
	 
	Committee Member

	Annual Cash Retainer
	 
	$90,000
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Audit Committee
	 
	 
	 
	$35,000
	 
	$25,000

	Compensation Committee
	 
	 
	 
	$35,000
	 
	$20,000

	Nominating Committee
	 
	 
	 
	$25,000
	 
	$20,000

	Compliance & Quality Committee
	 
	 
	 
	$25,000
	 
	$20,000

	Annual RSU Award
	 
	$175,000
	 
	 
	 
	 






The Company's non-executive chairman is entitled to receive an annual retainer of $150,000, payable in cash or stock at his election. 


The Company maintains a supplemental executive and director retirement savings plan pursuant to which non-employee directors may defer up to 100 percent of their cash director fees and make pre-tax contributions to an investment account established in their name. Non-employee directors may also elect to receive deferred stock units in lieu of annual cash retainers for board and committee service.


The Company also reimburses each non-employee director for his or her out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending Board of Directors’ meetings and committee meetings.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 2:06-mj-75-DRB 

)

RONALD MCQUEEN ) 

GOVERNMENT'S MOTION FOR DETENTION HEARING

Comes now the United States of America, by and through Leura Garrett Canary, United

States Attorney for the Middle District of Alabama, and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3142(e) and (f) moves

for a detention hearing for the above-captioned defendant.

1. Eligibility of Cases

This case is eligible for a detention order because this case involves:

Crime of violence (18 U.S.C. 3156)

Maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death

X 10 + year drug offense

Felony, with two prior convictions in the above categories

X Serious risk the defendant will flee

 X Serious risk of obstruction of justice

2. Reason For Detention

The Court should detain defendant because there are no conditions of release which will

reasonably assure:

X Defendant's appearance as required

 X Safety of any other person and the community

Case 2:06-mj-00075-DRB Document 4 Filed 07/28/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

3. Rebuttable Presumption

The United States will invoke the rebuttable presumption against defendant under Section

3142(e).

X Probable cause to believe defendant committed 10 + year drug offense or an

offense in which a firearm was used or carried under Section 924(c)

Previous conviction for "eligible" offense committed while on pretrial bond

A period of five years has not elapsed from defendant's conviction or release

from imprisonment for the offense described above

4. Time For Detention Hearing

The United States requests the Court conduct the detention hearing:

At the initial appearance

X After continuance of 3 days 

The Government requests leave of Court to file a supplemental motion with additional

grounds or presumption for detention should this be necessary.

Respectfully submitted this the 28th day of July, 2006.

LEURA GARRETT CANARY 

United States Attorney

/s/ Tommie Brown Hardwick

TOMMIE BROWN HARDWICK

Assistant United States Attorney

Post Office Box 197

Montgomery, Alabama 36101-0197

334.223.7280

334.223.7135 fax

tommie.hardwick@usdoj.gov

Case 2:06-mj-00075-DRB Document 4 Filed 07/28/2006 Page 2 of 2
CERTIFICATIONI, Kokmeng Koh, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-Drequired to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K ofPrincipal Life Income Fundings Trust 2006-61 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and otherinformation required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by thisreport is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required inthis report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the ExchangeAct period reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement(s) in all material respects; and  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be includedin this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A. and Bankers Trust Company, N.A.Date: March 28, 2007   /s/ Kokmeng Koh     Kokmeng Koh  Second Vice President
430.070 Definitions.

ACO, as used in this part and in FAR part 30, means administrative contracting officer as described

in FAR part 42.

Parent topic: PART 430 - COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ADMINISTRATION
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3186 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3186

     To extend temporarily the suspension of the duty on Terrazole.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

 Ms. Landrieu introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend temporarily the suspension of the duty on Terrazole.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TERRAZOLE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.59 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking the date in the 
effective period column and inserting ``December 31, 2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```