alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 2:06-cv-00701-ID-CSC Document 4 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 1 of 1
### Geohydrology of the cross-Florida barge canal area, with special reference to the Ocala vicinity

By: Glen L. Faulkner

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wri731

#### Links

- More information:  **Publisher Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2851 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on sodium methylate powder 

(NA methylate powder). 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 18, 2006 

Mr. DEMINT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on sodium 

methylate powder (NA methylate powder). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF EXISTING DUTY SUSPENSION 

4 ON SODIUM METHYLATE POWDER. 

5 (a) EXISTING DUTY SUSPENSION.—Heading 

6 9902.01.36 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

7 United States (relating to sodium methylate powder) is 

8 amended by striking the date in the effective period col9 umn and inserting ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 2851 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75968-75969]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30608]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Availability for Exclusive, Non-Exclusive, or Partially-Exclusive 
Licensing of an Invention Concerning the Clinical Decision Model

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Announcement is made of the availability for licensing of the 
invention set forth in patent application PCT/US2009/060850, entitled 
``Clinical Decision Model,'' filed October 15, 2009. The United States 
Government, as represented by the Secretary of the Army, has rights to 
this invention.

ADDRESSES: Commander, U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, 
ATTN: Command Judge Advocate, MCMR-JA, 504 Scott Street, Fort Detrick, 
Frederick, MD 21702-5012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For patent issues, Ms. Elizabeth 
Arwine, Patent Attorney, (301) 619-7808. For licensing issues, Dr. Paul 
Mele, Office of Research and Technology Applications

[[Page 75969]]

(ORTA), (301) 619-6664, both at telefax (301) 619-5034.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The invention relates to a model for 
providing a patient-specific diagnosis of disease using clinical data. 
More particularly, the invention relates to a fully unsupervised, 
machine-learned, cross-validated, and dynamic Bayesian Belief Network 
model that utilizes clinical parameters for determining a patient-
specific probability of malignancy, transplant glomerulopathy, healing 
rate of an acute traumatic wound, and/or breast cancer risk.

Brenda S. Bowen
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-30608 Filed 12-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-P
252.236-7012 Military Construction on Kwajalein Atoll—Evaluation Preference.       As prescribed in                 236.570             (c)(2), use the following provision:          MILITARY CONSTRUCTION ON KWAJALEIN ATOLL—EVALUATION PREFERENCE (MAR 1998)          (a)  *Definitions.*  As used in this provision—          (1)  “Marshallese firm” means a local firm incorporated in the Marshall Islands, or otherwise legally organized under the laws of the Marshall Islands, that—          (i)  Is more than 50 percent owned by citizens of the Marshall Islands; or          (ii)  Complies with the following:          (A)  The firm has done business in the Marshall Islands on a continuing basis for not less than 3 years prior to the date of issuance of this solicitation;          (B)  Substantially all of the firm’s directors of local operations, senior staff, and operating personnel are resident in the Marshall Islands or are U.S. citizens; and          (C)  Most of the operating equipment and physical plant are in the Marshall Islands.          (2)  “United States firm” means a firm incorporated in the United States that complies with the following:          (i)  The corporate headquarters are in the United States;          (ii)  The firm has filed corporate and employment tax returns in the United States for a minimum of 2 years (if required), has filed State and Federal income tax returns (if required) for 2 years, and has paid any taxes due as a result of these filings; and          (iii)  The firm employs United States citizens in key management positions.          (b)  *Evaluation.*  Offers from firms that do not qualify as United States firms or Marshallese firms will be evaluated by adding 20 percent to the offer, unless application of the factor would not result in award to a United States firm.          (c)  *Status.*  The offeror is ______ a United States firm;  ______ a Marshallese firm; _______ Other.          (End of provision)    **Parent topic:** 252.236 RESERVED
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report for the year ended December 31,
2010 on Form 10-K (the Annual Report), of Hughes Network Systems, LLC (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, we, Pradman P. Kaul and Grant A. Barber, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:



| | (i) | the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                             |  |                                                     
|------------------- |  | --------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 7, 2011 |  | HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC
|                    |  | (Registrant)               
|                    | 
|                    |  | /s/
PRADMAN P. KAUL        
|                    |  | Name:                       |  | Pradman P. Kaul                                     
|                    |  | Title:                      |  | Chief Executive Officer and President               
|                    |  |                             |  | (Principal Executive Officer)                       
|                    | 
|                    |  | /s/
GRANT A. BARBER        
|                    |  | Name:                       |  | Grant A. Barber                                     
|                    |  | Title:                      |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                    |  |                             |  | (Principal Financial Officer)                       

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS
WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
#### § 981.56 Assistance of Board in accounting for reserve.

The Board, on written request, may assist handlers in accounting for their reserve obligations and may aid any handler in acquiring almonds to meet any deficiency in his reserve.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 26, 2021

NO. 03-19-00548-CV

Byron Harper, Appellant

v.

PJC Air Conditioning and Plumbing, LLC 

d/b/a Rabroker Air Conditioning & Plumbing, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 169TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES BAKER AND TRIANA

REVERSED AND REMANDED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the order granting summary judgment signed by the trial court on July 31, 

2019. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was 

reversible error in the court’s order. The trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor 

of Rabroker. The Court reverses the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of 

Rabroker and remands the case to the trial court for further proceedings. The appellee shall pay 

all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I,Mark Mareske, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

 

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Logan County BancShares, Inc.;

 

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.   The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and have:

 

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;

 

(b)  Reserved;

 

(c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(d)  Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.   The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a)  All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: August 12, 2005 | /s/ Mark Mareske                 |   |
|----------------------------|----------------------------------|--------|
|                       | Mark Mareske, Vice President and |
|                       | Chief Financial Officer          |

 

----
160 So.2d 226

#### John SCOTT v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 47103.

Feb. 7, 1964.

In re: John Scott applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson. 158 So.2d 848.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal there appears no error of law in its judgment.
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Larry Gordon Carpenter, Jr.

, * From the 3 5th District Court

of Brown County,

Trial Court No. CR24337.

Vs. No. 11

- 1 8

- 00 277

- CR * October 31, 2018

The State of Texas

, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Willson, J. , and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment )

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the appeal

should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction . Therefore, in accordance with this

court ’ s opinion, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction

.
FAA UAS Civil C OA . R equest An y in fmmation tha tis p rov i ded is bound b y the Freedom of i nfor mation Act (FOI! >,) a nd may be releasa bi e. This re quir es compl i ance t o FOI A and cons e n tto U; e r elea se of yo ur inf o rm ation. lf you do not consent to til e releas e of you r in forrnation, yo u m us t c o ntact us for furth e r gu idance. F o r more info r mation, pl ease visit **http://vvvv~:v. ia**  **.g v/**  **.** Date **~2/26/2015** 333 Exe m ption # or Federa! Register Docket# I I --- ·-· - Pr oponent l nfon n a tion

C onta ct Name **~eff ey**  Company Name **~ir** Drones Atlanta St re et Ad d ress 1 11894 Connemara Drive St reet Address 2 Citv J

**~tlanta** State jQA El Zip Code !30341' I P!1one Numbe r 1770-455-6645

E-ma il Address !SkyDronesAtlanta@gmail.coh Aircraft Svstem.. ,L\i r craft Type !UAV I .l\ircraft Registration IN/A I Performance Characteristics Cti m b Rate **~** m/s (Feet/Minute) Descent Rate (F • 2et!M!nute)

**~m/s** <: IL-1 YL{
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3184 

To extend temporarily the suspension of the duty on 2-Mercaptoethanol. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Ms. LANDRIEU introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the suspension of the duty on 2- 

Mercaptoethanol. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2-MERCAPTOETHANOL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.01.60 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended 

6 by striking the date in the effective period column and 

7 inserting ‘‘December 31, 2009’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 this section shall apply with respect to goods entered, or 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 3184 IS 

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 4 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 4 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT
      32**




August
      17, 2006




Securities
      and Exchange Commission


450
      Fifth
      Street, NW


Washington,
      DC 20549




**CERTIFICATE
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER REGARDING**


**PERIODIC
      REPORT CONTAINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS**




I,
      John
      Paulsen, the Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of eNucleus, Inc. (the
      "Company"), in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that, to the best of his
      knowledge:




1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/   John
                    PaulsenJohn
                      Paulsen
                    Principal
                      Financial and
                    Accounting
                      OfficerAugust 17, 2006




This
      Certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of


Section
      18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 21 Filed 10/18/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 21 Filed 10/18/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 21 Filed 10/18/2006 Page 3 of 3
#### In re DALY’S ESTATE.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 19, 1914.)

In the matter of the estate of Catherine E. Daly, deceased.

PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed, with costs. Order filed. See, also, 79 Misc. Rep. 586, 141 N. Y. Supp. 199.

INGRAHAM, P. J., and DOWLING, J., dissent.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 11217 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

MARICELLA FRANKLIN

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:18

- CR

- 77

- 1

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Maricella Franklin

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d
229 (5th Cir. 2011). Franklin h a s not filed a response . We have reviewed
counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 6, 2019
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-11217 Document: 00514986442 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/06/2019No. 18

- 11217

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2

. Case: 18-11217 Document: 00514986442 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/06/2019
#### In the Matter of Morris L. Markel et al., Respondents, v Markel Electric Products, Inc., Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

Appeal dismissed as moot. (Appeal from order of Erie Supreme Court—resettle order.) Present— Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Callahan, Doerr and Moule, JJ.
ex-10.2

 

 AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
 

 THIS AMENDMENT (“Amendment”) is entered into effective as of February 15, 2018 and serves to amend the Employment Agreement entered into by and between Holly Brothers Pictures, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Company”), and Brent Willson (“Executive”), on January 29, 2018 (the “Agreement”).  All capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Agreement.
 

 For full and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is acknowledged by the parties, the parties hereby agree to amend the Agreement as follows:
 

 1.
 Section 2(a) of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated as follows:
 

 “Base Salary.  The Company shall pay to Executive an annual base salary of (“Base Salary”) of $50,000 which amount will be paid in accordance with the Company’s normal payroll procedures.”
 

 2.
 All other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect.
 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment to the Agreement as of the date written above.
 

 

 Holly Brothers Pictures, Inc.
 

 By: /s/ Steve Bond
 Name: Steve Bond
 Title:   Chief Financial Officer
 

 

 Brent Willson
 

 

 By: /s/ Brent Willson
Subpart 5205.3 - SYNOPSES OF CONTRACT

AWARDS

Parent topic: Part 5205 - PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONS

5205.303 Announcement of contract awards.

(a) Public Announcement.

(i) Report orders or modifications issued by CAOs that exceed the threshold.

(ii) Submit announcement information to the Navy Chief of Information (CHINFO).

(S-90) Security review. Routine contract announcements are exempt from the security review

process. However, full security review is required for contract announcements that are accompanied

by amplifying press releases.

(S-91) Format. To provide for a better understanding by the public, contracting activities should

explain in public announcements the specific type of contracting action being awarded (i.e., state

that the DON has “awarded a contract”, “exercised an option" or “negotiated a modification" to a

contract). Sample formats of announcements for contract modifications are illustrated below.

Formats may be altered to suit the circumstances of the contracting action.

(a) Contract award. (Name of contractor, city, state) ______________________ was awarded Contract

No. issued by the (activity) . The contract was awarded in the amount of $ .

(b) Contract modification. (Name of contractor, city, state) _________________ is receiving modification

number _____________________ to previously awarded Contract No. issued by the (activity) . This

modification increases the value of the basic contract by $ , the new total value is $. Insert an

explanatory statement similar to one of the following as appropriate:

(1) This modification adds the (# of increment, i.e., second, third, etc.) increment of the (length of

multi-year contract, i.e., three, four, etc.) year multi-year basic contract.

(2) This modification provides for the purchase of an additional quantity of (quantity and item, e.g.,

500 widgets) being produced under the basic contract. (If appropriate, indicate that the contracting

action is the result of a competitive negotiated procurement).

(3) This modification provides for the exercise of an option for an additional quantity of (quantity and

item, e.g., 200 gadgets) being produced under the basic contract.

(4) This modification changes the specifications for the (indicate item(s)) being produced under the

basic contract. The contractor indicates that the work (is being) (will be) performed at (city and

state).

(D)(5) Miscellaneous data. Include:

(a) a statement that the information contained in the announcement is unclassified;
(b) any areas of sensitivity or high-level interest;

(c) indication of appropriate coordination to ensure the accuracy of the wording and data to be

released.

(d) the estimated period of performance or delivery schedule.

(e) the amount of any of the obligated funds that would have expired at the end of the current fiscal

year.