alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
252.209-7004 Subcontracting with Firms that are Owned or Controlled by the Government of a Country that is a State Sponsor of Terrorism.       As prescribed in                 209.409             , use the following clause:          SUBCONTRACTING WITH FIRMS THAT ARE OWNED OR CONTROLLED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF A COUNTRY THAT IS A STATE SPONSOR OF TERRORISM (MAY 2019)          (a)  Unless the Government determines that there is a compelling reason to do so, the Contractor shall not enter into any subcontract in excess of the threshold specified in Federal Acquisition Regulation 9.405-2(b) on the date of subcontract award with a firm, or a subsidiary of a firm, that is identified in the Exclusions section of the System for Award Management (SAM Exclusions) as being ineligible for the award of Defense contracts or subcontracts because it is owned or controlled by the government of a country that is a state sponsor of terrorism.          (b)  A corporate officer or a designee of the Contractor shall notify the Contracting Officer, in writing, before entering into a subcontract with a party that is identified, in SAM Exclusions, as being ineligible for the award of Defense contracts or subcontracts because it is owned or controlled by the government of a country that is a state sponsor of terrorism.  The notice must include the name of the proposed subcontractor and the compelling reason(s) for doing business with the subcontractor notwithstanding its inclusion in SAM Exclusions.          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 252.209 RESERVED
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3111 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain printed circuit assemblies and 

other parts of measuring equipment for telecommunications. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain printed circuit 

assemblies and other parts of measuring equipment for 

telecommunications. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN PRINTED CIRCUIT ASSEMBLIES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.90.30 Printed circuit assemblies for instruments and apparatus for measuring or 

checking electrical quantities, specially 

designed for telecommunications (provided for in subheading 9030.90.88) ....... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•S 3111 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
432.001 Definitions.

The agency contract finance office is the office, other than the office of the requisitioner, providing

funding or performing funding record keeping for the contract action.

Responsible fiscal authority is that officer in the agency contract finance office with the

responsibility to ensure that adequate funds are available and usable for the intended purpose.

Parent topic: PART 432 - CONTRACT FINANCING
EX-34 (d)
(logo) Crowe
Crowe Chizek and Company LLC
Member Horwath International




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



Audit Committee
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
West Palm Beach, Florida


We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying report,
that Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC (the Company) complied with the servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission's Regulation AB for the Residential Mortgage Loans Platform (the
"Platform") as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, excluding criteria
1122(1)(iii) and 1122(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable
to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform. The
Platform consists of the asset-backed transactions and securities defined by
management in Appendix B of Management's Report. Management is responsible for
the Company's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards established by
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria for the Platform and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination
included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities constituting
the Platform and evaluating whether the Company performed servicing activities
related to those transactions and securities in compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria for the period covered by this report. Accordingly, our
testing may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed
transaction or security constituting the Platform. Further, our examination was
not designed to detect material noncompliance that may have occurred prior to
the period covered by this report and that may have affected the Company's
servicing activities during the period covered by this report. We believe that
our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination
does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion referred to above is fairly stated, in
all material respects, based on the aforementioned applicable servicing
criteria.


/s/ Crowe Chizek and Company LLC
Crowe Chizek and Company LLC


Fort Lauderdale, Florida
March 8, 2007
5211.603 Procedures.

(b) In accordance with DOD Manual 4400.1-M, DON activities shall, under the Defense Priorities and

Allocations System (DPAS):

(1) Use the DX rating for:

(A) Program 390;

(B) Integrated Ballistic Missile Defense System;

(C) Presidential Helicopter Programs (VH-92-A, VH-3D and VH-60N);

(D) Fleet Ballistic Missile Weapon Systems, Trident System including the Cruise Missile

Submarines/SSGN, and submarines with the Trident II SWS Missile - Ohio Class Submarines/SSBN,

Columbia Class Submarines (formerly Ohio Replacement Class)/SSBN (X), and all future submarines

that carry the Trident Missile;

(E) Program 341;

(F) E-6B Command, Control and Communications Aircraft Program;

(G) Space-Based Infrared System High; Intercontinental Ballistic Missile;

(H) Minuteman II;

(I) B-2 Stealth Bomber;

(J) Presidential Aircraft (VC-25A and VC-25B Presidential Aircraft Recapitalization).

(f) HCAs are responsible for establishing procedures for rated orders.

(g) Each Contracting Activity has an assigned DPAS Officer to provide guidance and resolve

questions associated with DPAS. Contact the Contracting Activity’s Policy office for DPAS point of

contact information .

Parent topic: Subpart 5211.6 - PRIORITIES AND ALLOCATIONS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Theodore Robert Taylor, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed (see *People v Esteves,*41 NY2d 826; *People v Shively,*66 AD2d 1022). (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court—robbery, first degree.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Hancock, Jr., Callahan and Moule, JJ.
April 1, 1965

HonorableBen Atwell, Chairman OpinionNo. C-411 Revenueand TaxationCommittee House of Representatives Re: Constitutionality of Austin,Texas House Bill 315, 59th Legislature,

Regular Dear I%. Atwell: Session. You ask the opinion of the AttorneyGeneral as to whetherHouse Bill 315, 59th Legislature, RegularSession, is constitutional. This Bill Imposes a new tax

11 upon the first sale, distributionor use of motor fuel in this State for producing or generatingpower for the operationor propulsion of vessels on the waterways of this State, an excise tax of five cents (54) per gallon, or fractlonal part thereof so sold, distrtbuted or used In this State . . . .' The tax is collectedby each "distributor"' who makes a first sale, distributionor use of motor fuel in this State as provided in Article 9.30 of this Bill. The tax Is reported and paid to the State by such distributorin the same manner ‘In

which he reports and pays the presentmotor fuel tax imposedby Chapter 9 of said Title 122A.

L/ Distributoris defined in Article 9.01(4) of the present motor fuel tax laws, same being Article 9.01(4) of Title 122A, Taxation-General, of our Revised Civil Statutes.

-1941-HonorableBen Atwell, Page 2 (C-411)

This type of excise tax has been held constitutional. State v. City of El Paso, 143 S.W.2d 366, 135 Tex. 359 (1940). See also Texas Constitution, ArticleVIII, Section 17. It Is, therefore,our opinion that House Bill 315 is constitutional.
SUMMARY ------- Rouse Bill No. 315 pending before the 59th Legislature, Regular Session, is constitutional. Yours very truly,

WAGGONERCARR AttorneyGeneral of Texas

WEA/fb APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE W. V. Geppert, Chairman Pat Bailey John Reeves Paul Phy Milton Richardson APPROVEDFOR TEE ATTORNEYGENERAL By: Stanton Stone

-1942-
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3213 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain light-absorbing photo dyes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. LAUTENBERG introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain light-absorbing 

photo dyes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN LIGHT-ABSORBING PHOTO DYES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 3213 IS 

‘‘ 9902.29.45 Morpholine, 4-[4,5-dihydro-4-[3-[5-hydroxy-1-methyl-3-(4- 

morpholinylcarbonyl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl]-2- 

propenylidene]-1-methyl-5-oxo-1Hpyrazol-3-yl]carbonyl]-, potassium salt 

(CAS No. 183196–57–8) (provided for in 

subheading 2934.99.90); 1,4- 

Benzenedisulfonic acid,2-[4-[5-[1-(2,5- 

disulfophenyl)-1,5-dihydro-3- 

[(methylamino)carbonyl]-5-oxo-4Hpyrazol-4-ylidene]-3-(2-oxo-1- 

pyrrolidinyl)-1,3-pentadienyl]-5-ydroxy-3- 

[(methylamino)carbonyl]-1H-pyrazol-1- 

yl]-, pentapotassium salt (CAS No. 

202482–44–8) (provided for in subheading 2942.00.00) ................................ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to goods entered, 

3 or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the date that is 15 days after the date of enactment of 

5 this Act. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.28.1
Third Point Reinsurance Ltd.
Schedule of Signatories to the Director and Officer Indemnification Agreement


J. Robert Bredahl
Nicholas J.D. Campbell
Christopher S. Coleman
Steven Elliot Fass
Rafe de la Gueronniere
Manoj K. Gupta
Mary R. Hennessy
Daniel V. Malloy
Neil McConachie
Jonathan Norton
Mark Parkin
Joshua L. Targoff
Janice R. Weidenborner
§ 948.56 Nomination and selection. ( a ) Each area committee shall hold or cause to be held, not less than 15 days prior to the expiration date of respective terms of office, meetings of producers and handlers for each subdivision in which terms expire or in which vacancies otherwise occur.
( b ) At each such meeting one or more nominees shall be designated for each impending vacancy as member or alternate. Such designation may be by ballot or by motion at the option of those present in voting capacity.
( c ) Only producers may participate in designating producer nominees; only handlers may participate in designating handler nominees; and only duly authorized representatives of producers' cooperative marketing associations may participate in designating nominees to represent such associations. If no separate representation is provided for producers' cooperative marketing associations, duly authorized representatives of such associations may participate in designating handler nominees.
( d ) Each producers' cooperative marketing association shall be entitled to cast only one vote in designating nominees to represent such associations. Each producer and each handler shall be entitled to cast only one vote on behalf of himself, his agents, subsidiaries, affiliates, and representatives.
( e ) If a producer, handler, or producers' cooperative marketing association is engaged in producing or handling potatoes in more than one area, or in more than one subdivision of an area, such producer, handler, or producers' cooperative marketing association shall elect the area or subdivision in which he may participate in designating nominees. In no event shall there be participation in more than one area or subdivision.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Sarah Boston, deceased.

(Argued June 17,1884;

decided June 24, 1884.)

This was a motion to set aside a judgment taken on affirmance by default.

The court say : “ Under the circumstances of delay and acquiescence which appear in this case, there seems to be no reason for the interference of the court, and the motion should, in both aspects, be denied.”

*EranTdin Bien*for motion.

*W. W. Cul/oer*opposed.

*Per Ouriam*

Mem. for denial of motion.

„ All concur.

Motion denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

vs. ) CR. NO. 2:06cr177-WHA

ATOYA ALQUITA WILLIAMS )

ORDER

This case is set for hearing on the violations of conditions of supervision on Tuesday,

December 5, 2006, at 9:00 a.m. in District Courtroom 2-C, Frank M. Johnson, Jr. United States

Courthouse Complex, One Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama.

DONE this 1st day of December, 2006.

 /s/ W. Harold Albritton 

W. HAROLD ALBRITTON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00177-WHA-DRB Document 6 Filed 12/01/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 22 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 22 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 22 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 22 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 4 of 4
#### § 905.12 Committee.

*Committee* means the Citrus Administrative Committee established pursuant to § 905.19.

[42 FR 59368, Nov. 17, 1977]
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2841 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain turn or turned footwear. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 18, 2006 

Mr. BROWNBACK introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain turn or turned 

footwear. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN TURN OR TURNED FOOTWEAR. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.13.84 Turn or turned footwear 

with outer soles of leather 

and uppers of leather, other 

than for men or women 

(provided for in subheading 

6403.59.15) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•S 2841 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
#### § 66.118 Other claims.

Nothing in this subpart will prohibit regulated entities from making other claims regarding bioengineered foods, provided that such claims are consistent with applicable Federal law.
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>   0000761023
<NAME>  CARLYLE REAL ESTATE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - XV

       
<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-1995

<CASH>                                           10,248,858 
<SECURITIES>                                        451,926 
<RECEIVABLES>                                             0    
<ALLOWANCES>                                     14,229,720 
<INVENTORY>                                               0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 24,930,504 
<PP&E>                                          335,309,307 
<DEPRECIATION>                                  102,245,911 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  302,797,672 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           196,560,977 
<BONDS>                                         108,478,585 
<COMMON>                                                  0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0    
<PREFERRED>                                               0    
<OTHER-SE>                                      (30,345,250)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    302,797,672 
<SALES>                                          34,683,203 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 35,618,988 
<CGS>                                                     0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    23,633,253 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1,086,386 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               22,731,725 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (11,832,376)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (12,349,561)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   7,036,520 
<CHANGES>                                                 0    
<NET-INCOME>                                     (5,313,041)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (11.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (11.02)

        


</TABLE>
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-14-00027-CR

RODERICK UNDREA WILLIAMS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 8th District Court

Hopkins County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1323471

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Roderick Undrea Williams, appellant, has submitted to the trial court a personal letter 

requesting dismissal of his appeal in this matter. The letter was submitted to this Court as part of 

the clerk’s record, and we view the letter as the clearest possible expression of Williams’ desire 

to dismiss this appeal. As authorized by Rule 42.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, 

we grant Williams’ request. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

Josh R. Morriss, III

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: September 2, 2014

Date Decided: September 3, 2014

Do Not Publish
Exhibit 31(ii)
                               --------------


                               CERTIFICATIONS

      I, Steve Bailey, certify that:


      1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
            10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
            report on Form 10-K of Alternative Loan Trust 2006-30T1 (the
            "Exchange Act periodic reports");

      2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as
            a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
            omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
            made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
            were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
            this report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
            information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
            covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
            reports;

      4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
            servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance review(s)
            conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement(s)
            required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and
            except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the
            servicer(s) have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing
            agreement(s) in all material respects; and

      5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
            criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
            reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
            asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
            accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
            13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
            except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
            instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
            disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
      information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The
      Bank of New York, as Trustee.

Date: March 27, 2007


       /s/ Steve Bailey
       ----------------------------
       Steve Bailey
       Senior Managing Director, Loan Administration