# L_2014147EN.01008801.xml

| 17.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 147/88 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 147/88

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION

of 12 May 2014

as regards the standard reporting requirements for national programmes for the eradication, control and monitoring of certain animal diseases and zoonoses co-financed by the Union and repealing Decision 2008/940/EC

(notified under document C(2014) 2976)

(2014/288/EU)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Decision 2009/470/EC of 25 May 2009 on expenditure in the veterinary field (1), and in particular Article 27(10) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Decision 2009/470/EC lays down the procedures governing the financial contribution from the Union towards the programmes for the eradication, control and monitoring of animal diseases and zoonoses. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Decision 2009/470/EC lays down the procedures governing the financial contribution from the Union towards the programmes for the eradication, control and monitoring of animal diseases and zoonoses.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 27(1) of Decision 2009/470/EC a Union financial measure is introduced to reimburse the expenditure incurred by the Member States for the financing of national programmes for the eradication, control and monitoring of the animal diseases and zoonoses listed in the Annex to that Decision. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 27(1) of Decision 2009/470/EC a Union financial measure is introduced to reimburse the expenditure incurred by the Member States for the financing of national programmes for the eradication, control and monitoring of the animal diseases and zoonoses listed in the Annex to that Decision.

| (3) | Article 27(7) of Decision 2009/470/EC provides that Member States are to submit, for each approved programme, intermediate technical and financial reports and, by 30 April each year at the latest, an annual detailed technical report, including the assessment of the results achieved and detailed account of expenditure incurred for the previous year. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Article 27(7) of Decision 2009/470/EC provides that Member States are to submit, for each approved programme, intermediate technical and financial reports and, by 30 April each year at the latest, an annual detailed technical report, including the assessment of the results achieved and detailed account of expenditure incurred for the previous year.

| (4) | Commission Decision 2008/940/EC (2) defines the information that Member States having programmes for the eradication, monitoring and control of certain animal diseases approved for Union co-financing shall provide within the intermediate and final technical and financial reports. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Commission Decision 2008/940/EC (2) defines the information that Member States having programmes for the eradication, monitoring and control of certain animal diseases approved for Union co-financing shall provide within the intermediate and final technical and financial reports.

| (5) | Since the adoption of Decision 2008/940/EC and in the framework of simplification and improvement of the requirements and procedures in relation to the programmes, changes have been introduced as regards the measures considered eligible for Union financial contribution and the method of calculation of the reimbursement as laid down in the financing decisions approving the programmes for each calendar year. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

Since the adoption of Decision 2008/940/EC and in the framework of simplification and improvement of the requirements and procedures in relation to the programmes, changes have been introduced as regards the measures considered eligible for Union financial contribution and the method of calculation of the reimbursement as laid down in the financing decisions approving the programmes for each calendar year.

| (6) | In addition, in order to further improve the process of submission of reports, their processing and evaluation as well as the follow up of progress over the years, the intermediate and final reports for the implementation of the programmes should be submitted by the Member States on-line from 1 July 2015 onwards using electronic templates developed by the Commission for this purpose. The structure of the relevant reports should therefore be adapted for the electronic submission and processing of data. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

In addition, in order to further improve the process of submission of reports, their processing and evaluation as well as the follow up of progress over the years, the intermediate and final reports for the implementation of the programmes should be submitted by the Member States on-line from 1 July 2015 onwards using electronic templates developed by the Commission for this purpose. The structure of the relevant reports should therefore be adapted for the electronic submission and processing of data.

| (7) | Therefore, the standard requirements for the submission by Member States of applications for Union financing for the national programmes for the eradication, control and monitoring of certain animal diseases and zoonoses should be amended and made consistent with the amendments to relevant Union legislation and compatible with the on-line submission system. |
| --- | --- |

(7)

Therefore, the standard requirements for the submission by Member States of applications for Union financing for the national programmes for the eradication, control and monitoring of certain animal diseases and zoonoses should be amended and made consistent with the amendments to relevant Union legislation and compatible with the on-line submission system.

| (8) | In the second half of each year, the Commission requests from the Member States to provide updated information on the usage of funds for eligible measures under their programmes since the beginning of the year and estimations for the total needed budget for the whole year. On the basis of this information and in order to improve the usage of available funds the Commission prepares every year a Decision amending the financing decision for that year to reallocate funds between programmes that are expected not to use their initial allocation of funds and programmes reported to be in need of additional funds. |
| --- | --- |

(8)

In the second half of each year, the Commission requests from the Member States to provide updated information on the usage of funds for eligible measures under their programmes since the beginning of the year and estimations for the total needed budget for the whole year. On the basis of this information and in order to improve the usage of available funds the Commission prepares every year a Decision amending the financing decision for that year to reallocate funds between programmes that are expected not to use their initial allocation of funds and programmes reported to be in need of additional funds.

| (9) | In order to optimise the efficiency of the exercise of reallocating funds amongst programmes, it is appropriate that the Member States also submit quantitative information on the activities already performed and expected to be performed, as well as unit cost data. Furthermore, to reduce administrative burden the submission of information for the reallocation of funds should be integrated within the submission of intermediate reports. |
| --- | --- |

(9)

In order to optimise the efficiency of the exercise of reallocating funds amongst programmes, it is appropriate that the Member States also submit quantitative information on the activities already performed and expected to be performed, as well as unit cost data. Furthermore, to reduce administrative burden the submission of information for the reallocation of funds should be integrated within the submission of intermediate reports.

| (10) | It is therefore appropriate that Decision 2008/940/EC is repealed and replaced by the current Decision. |
| --- | --- |

(10)

It is therefore appropriate that Decision 2008/940/EC is repealed and replaced by the current Decision.

| (11) | The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health, |
| --- | --- |

(11)

The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Member States shall, in accordance with this Decision, submit intermediate and final reports as regards programmes approved pursuant to Article 27 of Decision 2009/470/EC.

Article 2

For the purposes of this Decision, the following definitions shall apply:

| (a) | ‘intermediate reports’ means intermediate technical (3) and financial reports on the implementation of running programmes, to be submitted to the Commission as provided for in Article 27(7)(a) of Decision 2009/470/EC; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

‘intermediate reports’ means intermediate technical (3) and financial reports on the implementation of running programmes, to be submitted to the Commission as provided for in Article 27(7)(a) of Decision 2009/470/EC;

| (b) | ‘final reports’ means detailed technical and financial reports to be submitted to the Commission by 30 April each year at the latest for the entire of the preceding year of application of each approved programme, as provided for in Article 27(7)(b) of Decision 2009/470/EC; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

‘final reports’ means detailed technical and financial reports to be submitted to the Commission by 30 April each year at the latest for the entire of the preceding year of application of each approved programme, as provided for in Article 27(7)(b) of Decision 2009/470/EC;

| (c) | ‘payment applications’ means the payment applications relating to the expenditure incurred by a Member State to be submitted to the Commission, as provided for in Article 27(8) of Decision 2009/470/EC. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

‘payment applications’ means the payment applications relating to the expenditure incurred by a Member State to be submitted to the Commission, as provided for in Article 27(8) of Decision 2009/470/EC.

Article 3

1.   With regard to running programmes approved for co-financing by the Union in accordance with Article 27(5) of Decision 2009/470/EC, an intermediate report shall be submitted to the Commission by 31 August each year at the latest.

2.   Intermediate reports shall provide all the relevant information in accordance with Annex I.

Article 4

Final reports and payment applications shall provide all the relevant information in accordance with Annex II, as well as:

| (a) | technical information in accordance with:






  (i) | Annex III, in respect of bovine tuberculosis, bovine brucellosis, ovine and caprine brucellosis, bluetongue in endemic or high risk areas, anthrax, contagious bovine pleuropneumonia, echinococcosis, trichinellosis and verotoxigenic E. coli; |
| --- | --- | --- |

(a)

technical information in accordance with:

(i)

Annex III, in respect of bovine tuberculosis, bovine brucellosis, ovine and caprine brucellosis, bluetongue in endemic or high risk areas, anthrax, contagious bovine pleuropneumonia, echinococcosis, trichinellosis and verotoxigenic E. coli;

| (ii) | Annex IV, in respect of Salmonellosis (zoonotic Salmonella); |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

Annex IV, in respect of Salmonellosis (zoonotic Salmonella);

| (iii) | Annex V, in respect of African swine fever, swine vesicular disease, classical swine fever; |
| --- | --- |

(iii)

Annex V, in respect of African swine fever, swine vesicular disease, classical swine fever;

| (iv) | Annex VI, in respect of rabies; |
| --- | --- |

(iv)

Annex VI, in respect of rabies;

| (v) | Annex VII, in respect of transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSE); |
| --- | --- |

(v)

Annex VII, in respect of transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSE);

| (vi) | Annex VIII, in respect of avian influenza; |
| --- | --- |

(vi)

Annex VIII, in respect of avian influenza;

| (vii) | Annex IX, in respect of infectious hematopoietic necrosis (IHN), infectious salmon anaemia (ISA), viral haemorrhagic septicaemia (VHS), Koi herpes virus infection (KHV), infection with Bonamia ostreae, infection with Marteilia refringens and white spot disease in crustaceans; |
| --- | --- |

(vii)

Annex IX, in respect of infectious hematopoietic necrosis (IHN), infectious salmon anaemia (ISA), viral haemorrhagic septicaemia (VHS), Koi herpes virus infection (KHV), infection with Bonamia ostreae, infection with Marteilia refringens and white spot disease in crustaceans;

| (b) | information on the activities and costs, in accordance with Part I of Annex X and a signed declaration for each programme, in accordance with Part II of Annex X. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

information on the activities and costs, in accordance with Part I of Annex X and a signed declaration for each programme, in accordance with Part II of Annex X.

Article 5

1.   From 1 July 2015, the intermediate reports provided for in Article 3 and the final reports and payment applications provided for in Article 4 shall be submitted on-line by Member States using the corresponding standard electronic templates provided by the Commission, except for the programmes for the diseases referred to in Article 4(a)(vii).

2.   In addition to the requirements of paragraph 1, a signed version of the part of the final reports and payment applications referred to in Article 4(b) shall be submitted to the Commission.

Article 6

Decision 2008/940/EC is repealed.

Article 7

Without prejudice to Article 5, this Decision shall apply to programmes for the eradication, control and monitoring of animal diseases to be implemented as from 1 January 2015.

Article 8

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 May 2014.

For the Commission

Tonio BORG

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 155, 18.6.2009, p. 30.

1

(2)  Commission Decision 2008/940/EC of 21 October 2008 laying down standard reporting requirements for national programmes for the eradication, control and monitoring of certain animal diseases and zoonoses co-financed by the Community (OJ L 335, 13.12.2008, p. 61).

2

(3)  Only intermediate financial report is due by 2015.

3

---

ANNEX I

Requirements for intermediate reports

Image 1

Member State:

Annual

Multiannual — period of implementation:

Disease/zoonosis ( 1 ):

Animal species:

Content and structure of the report:

1. Description and evaluation of the evolution of the epidemiological situation and the technical implementation of the activities foreseen under the programme.

2. Confirmation that all legislation concerning the implementation of the programme was in force at the beginning of the programme.

3. Information on the activities carried out under the programme and the eligible expenditure during the first 6 months of the year of implementation and for those expected to be carried out during the last 6 months of the year of implementation in accordance with Part I of Annex X.

( 1 ) Disease or zoonosis and animal species if necessary.

---

ANNEX II

Requirements for final reports and payment applications

Image 2

Member State:

Annual: Year of implementation:

Multiannual — period of implementation:

Disease/zoonosis ( 1 ):

Animal species:

Content and structure of the report:

1. Description and evaluation of the evolution of the epidemiological situation, the technical implementation of the activities foreseen under the programme and the cost-effectiveness of the programmes.

2. Details on the level of achievement of the targets set in the approved programme and technical difficulties.

3. Submission of technical and financial data and payment application in accordance with the corresponding Annexes as set out in Article 4.

4. Epidemiological maps for infection and other relevant data on the disease/activities.

5. Additional epidemiological information: information on epidemiological inquiries, serotypes involved, abortions, lesions found in abattoir or necropsy, human cases, etc.

( 1 ) Disease or zoonosis and animal species if necessary.

---

ANNEX III

Final technical report on ruminant diseases programmes

Image 3

Table A ( a )

Data on herds

Member State: Date: Year:

Disease:

Region ( b )

Animal species

Total number of herds ( c )

Total number of herds under the programme

Number of herds to be checked under the programme

Number of herds checked ( d )

Number of positive herds ( e )

Number of new positive herds ( f )

Number of herds depopulated

% positive herds depopulated

INDICATORS

% herd coverage

% positive herds Period herd prevalence

% new positive herds Herd incidence

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10 = (9/7) × 100

11 = (6/5) × 100

12 = (7/6) × 100

13 = (8/6) × 100

Total

Total previous

( a ) One table per disease/species. Not to be filled in for bluetongue programmes.

( b ) Region as defined in the programme of the Member State.

( c ) Total number of herds existing in the region including eligible herds and non-eligible herds for the programme.

( d ) Check means to perform a herd level test under the programme for the respective disease with the purpose of maintaining or upgrading, the health status of the herd. In this column a herd must not be counted twice even if has been checked more than once.

( e ) Herds with at least one positive animal during the period independent of the number of times the herd has been checked.

( f ) Herds which status in the previous period was Unknown, Not free-negative, Free, Officially Free or Suspended and have at least one animal tested positive in this period.

Image 4

Table B

Data on animals

Region ( a )

Animal species

Total number of animals ( b )

Number of animals under the programme

Number of animals ( c ) to be tested under the programme

Number of animals ( c ) tested

Number of animals tested individually ( d )

Number of positive animals

Slaughtering ( f )

INDICATORS

Number of animals with positive result slaughtered or culled

Total number of animals slaughtered ( e )

% coverage at animal level ( f )

% positive animals

Animal prevalence ( f )

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11=(6/5) × 100

12=(8/6) × 100

Total

Total previous year

( a ) Region as defined in the programme of the Member State.

( b ) Total number of animals existing in the region including eligible herds and non-eligible herds for the programme.

( c ) Includes animals tested individually or under bulk level scheme.

( d ) Include only animals tested individually, do not include animals tested by bulk level samples (for instance: milk bulk tank tests).

( e ) Include all positive animal slaughtered and also the negative animals slaughtered under the programme.

( f ) Columns not to be filled in for bluetongue programmes.

Image 5

Table C

Data on vaccination programmes

Region ( a )

Animal species

Total number of herds ( b )

Total number of animals

Information on vaccination programme

Serotype ( d )

Number of herds in vaccination programme

Number of herds vaccinated

Number of animals vaccinated

Number of doses of vaccine administered

Number of adults vaccinated ( c )

Number of young animals vaccinated (c)

Number of animals with primary vaccination ( d ) (initial+booster)

Total

( a ) Region as defined in the programme of the Member State.

( b ) Herds or flocks or holdings as appropriate.

( c ) For bluetongue programmes distinction between adult and young animals not required.

( d ) To be filled in only for bluetongue programmes.

Image 6

Table D ( a )

Data on status of herds at the end of the period

Region ( b )

Animal species

Status of herds and animals under the programme ( c )

Total number of herds and animals under the programme

Unknown ( d )

Not free or not officially free from disease

Free or officially free-disease status suspended/withdrawn ( g )

Free from disease ( h )

Officially free from disease ( i )

Last check positive ( e )

Last check negative ( f )

Herds

Animals ( j )

Herds

Animals ( j )

Herds

Animals ( j )

Herds

Animals ( j )

Herds

Animals ( j )

Herds

Animals ( j )

Herds

Animals ( j )

Total

( a ) Not to be filled in for bluetongue programmes.

( b ) Region as defined in the programme of the Member State.

( c ) At the end of the year.

( d ) Unknown: No previous checking results available.

( e ) Not free and last check positive: Herd checked with at least one positive result in the latest check.

( f ) Not free and last check negative: Herd checked with negative results in the latest check but not being Free or Officially Free.

( g ) Suspended as defined in Union or national legislation for the respective disease at the end of the reporting period.

( h ) Free herd as defined in Union or national legislation for the respective disease.

( i ) Officially free herd as defined in Union or national legislation for the respective disease.

( j ) Include animals under the programme in the herds with the referred status (left column).

Image 7

Table E ( a )

Suspension/withdrawal of the free or officially free status

Region ( b )

Species

Reason ( c )

Number of herds suspended

( a ) Not to be filled in for bluetongue programmes.

( b ) Region as defined in the programme of the Member State.

( c ) Indicate the motive:

— non-negative result in diagnostic test,

— does not fulfil the routine testing frequency,

— entering animals in the herd with insufficient status,

— the disease is suspected,

— other (specify).

Table F

Stratified data on surveillance and laboratory tests

Region ( a )

Animal species/category

Test type ( b )

Description of test

Number of samples tested

Number of positive samples

Total

( a ) Region as defined in the programme of the Member State.

( b ) Indicate whether the test is serological, virological etc.

---

ANNEX IV

Technical report on zoonotic salmonella programmes

Image 8

Table A

Data on national implementation of Salmonella control programmes (SCP) ( a )

Type of flock

Flocks under the SCP

Total No of flocks checked ( d ) ( e )

Total No of flocks officially sampled ( e )

Total No of visits for taking official samples

No of positive ( f ) flocks

Targeted serotypes found ( g )

No of positive flocks depopulated

Total No of animals in these flocks

No of eggs destroyed

No of eggs sent for heat treatment

Total No of flocks concerned ( b )

Total No of smaller flocks ( c )

Breeders

Layers

Breeding turkeys

Total

Type of flock

Holdings/flocks under the SCP

Total No of flocks checked ( d ) ( e )

Total No of holdings officially sampled ( e )

Total No of visits for taking official samples

No of positive ( f ) flocks

Targeted serotypes found ( g )

Total No of animals in these flocks

Total No of holdings concerned ( b )

Total No of flocks produced

Total No of smaller holdings ( c )

Total No of flocks produced

Broilers

Fattening turkeys

Total

( a ) As defined in Union legislation.

( b ) Flocks/holdings with official sampling requirements detailed in the Regulations specific to each poultry population:

Breeders: flocks of at least 250 adult birds; Layers: flocks of at least 1 000 birds; Breeding turkeys: flocks with at least 250 adult breeding turkeys and all flocks with elite, great grandparents and grandparent breeding turkeys;

Broilers: number of holdings with more than 5 000 birds; Fattening turkeys: number of holdings with at least 500 fattening turkeys.

( c ) Flocks/holdings below the size of those already reported in the second column and also covered by the Salmonella national control programme.

( d ) A checked flock is a flock where samples (official or at the initiative of the food business operator) were taken under a Salmonella national control programme.

( e ) In this column a flock must not be counted twice even if it has been checked more than once.

( f ) Flocks where at least one targeted serovar was found (on official or FBO samples). If more than one positive sample was found in the flock, it shall be taken into account only once.

( g ) Indicate the targeted serotypes found in the positive flocks (for instance SE = Salmonella Enteritidis, ST = S. Typhimurium, SH = S. Hadar, SI = S. Infantis, SV = S. Virchow) and the number of occurrences for each.

Image 9

Table B

Stratified data on laboratory tests on official samples

Test description

Test type ( a )

Number of tests performed

Number of positive results

Microbiological tests

Serotyping test

Bacteriological test performed to verify the efficacy of disinfection of poultry houses after depopulation of a Salmonella -positive flock

Tests for the detection of antimicrobials/bacterial growth inhibitors

Total

( a ) If the reference method is not used.

Table C

Data on vaccination programmes

Type of flock

Number of flocks in vaccination programme

Number of flocks vaccinated

Number of animals vaccinated

Number of doses of vaccine administered

Breeders

Layers

Breeding turkeys

Total

---

ANNEX V

Final technical report on swine diseases programmes

Image 10

Member State: Date: Year:

Disease:

Table A

Disease surveillance in domestic pigs

Region

Number of farms sampled

Type of farm

Number of animals sampled

Number of farms with serologically positive result

Number of farms with active infection detected

1

2

3

4

5

6

Commercial ( 1 )

Backyard ( 1 )

Total

( 1 ) As defined in the approved programme of the Member State.

Table B

Disease surveillance in wild boar/feral pigs

Region

Species

Type of surveillance

Number of animals tested

Positive

% Positive

active, passive

Total

Image 11

Table C

Wild boar oral vaccination

Region/Area

Month

Number of baits

Size of vaccinated area (km2)

1

2

3

4

Total

Table D

Stratified data on diagnostic tests and results

Region

Animal population

Laboratory test used

Type of sample

Number of animals tested

Number of tests carried out

Number of positive results

Comments

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Domestic pigs, Wild boar, feral pigs

ELISA, VNT, PCR

Serum, Blood, tissues

Other

Other

Other

Total

---

ANNEX VI

Final technical report on rabies programmes

Image 12

Member State: Date: Year:

Table A

Test for the monitoring of vaccination effectiveness

Region

Species and age ( a )

Type of test ( b )

Test description ( c )

Number of tests

Number positive

% Positive

1

2

3

4

5

6

7=(6/5) × 100

Total

Surveillance tests

Region

Species

Category ( d )

Test description ( c )

Number of tests

Number of positive results

1

2

3

4

5

Total

Further investigation of positive cases

Rabies virus isolates typed for differentiation from vaccine strain:

Typing results:

( a ) Provide separately results between juvenile and adults and by target species (if more than one).

( b ) Serological or presence of biomarker.

( c ) Name the diagnostic method (e.g. ELISA, PCR, FAT etc.).

( d ) Present surveillance tests on suspected and dead animals (passive surveillance) separately from results on hunted animals (active surveillance).

Image 13

Table B

Wildlife oral vaccination

Aerial distribution data files:

— flight routes recorded during the distribution

— bait release data (time and position of each bait released) recorded during the distribution

Description of the analysis performed by the Competent Authority on the aerial distribution data and conclusions of the assessment for the quality of the distribution:

Region/Area

Start date

Completion date

Product used

Number of doses

Size of vaccinated area (km2)

Distribution method

Total

Table C

Official control of oral vaccines before their distribution

Number of batches distributed

Number of batches controlled by the CA

Number of batches rejected

Batch Number

Manufacturer

Sampling date

Virus titration result

Total

---

ANNEX VII

Final technical report on tse monitoring and eradication programmes

Image 14

Member State: Date: Year:

Table A ( a )

Rapid tests in bovine animals

Animals referred to in Annex III, Chapter A, Part I, points 2.1, 3 and 4 of Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council ( 1 )

Age limit applied ( b )

Number of animals tested

Number of rapid tests, including those used for confirmation

Animals referred to in Annex III, Chapter A, Part I, point 2.2 of Regulation (EC) No 999/2001

Others (specify)

( 1 ) OJ L 147, 31.5.2001, p. 1.

( a ) Member States may opt not to fill in Table A and declare that the relevant data already reported to the Commission in accordance with Article 6(4) of Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 shall be considered for the purposes of this report, provided that this data indicates separately the number of tested animals aged below the age limit applied in the Member State from the animals tested above that limit.

( b ) Cases of application of a different age limit than the one applied in the Member State for the subcategory (voluntary, fulfilment of export requirements etc.) should be mentioned in separate rows.

Table B

Population of ewes and ewe lambs put to the ram in the Member State

Rapid tests in ovine animals

Number of animals tested

Ovine animals referred to in Annex III, Chapter A, Part II, point 2 of Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 ( a )

Ovine animals referred to in Annex III, Chapter A, Part II, point 3 of Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 ( a )

Ovine animals referred to in Annex III, Chapter A, Part II, point 5 of Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 ( a )

Ovine animals referred to in Annex VII, Chapter B, point 3.1 of Regulation (EC) No 999/2001

Ovine animals referred to in Annex VII, Chapter B, point 4.1 of Regulation (EC) No 999/2001

Ovine animals referred to in Annex VII, Chapter B, point 2.2.3 of Regulation (EC) No 999/2001

Others (specify)

( a ) Member States may opt not to fill in this field and declare instead that the relevant data reported to the Commission in accordance with Article 6(4) of Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 shall be considered for the purposes of this report.

Image 15

Table C

Population of goats which have already kidded and goats mated in the Member State

Rapid tests in caprine animals

Number of animals tested

Caprine animals referred to in Annex III, Chapter A, Part II, point 2 of Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 ( a )

Caprine animals referred to in Annex III, Chapter A, Part II, point 3 of Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 ( a )

Caprine animals referred to in Annex III, Chapter A, Part II, point 5 of Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 ( a )

Caprine animals referred to in Annex VII, Chapter B, point 3.1 of Regulation (EC) No 999/2001

Caprine animals referred to in Annex VII, Chapter B, point 4.1 of Regulation (EC) No 999/2001

Caprine animals referred to in Annex VII, Chapter B, point 2.2.3 of Regulation (EC) No 999/2001

Others (specify)

( a ) Member States may opt not to fill in this field and instead declare that the relevant data reported to the Commission in accordance with Article 6(4) of Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 shall be considered for the purposes of this report.

Table D

Confirmatory and discriminatory tests

Number of tests

Confirmatory tests ( a ) other than rapid tests ( b ) in bovine animals

Confirmatory tests ( a ) in ovine and caprine animals

Discriminatory tests ( c ) in ovine and caprine animals

Discriminatory tests in bovine animals

( a ) As referred to in Chapter C of Annex X to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001.

( b ) Rapid tests used as confirmatory tests must be included in Table A of Annex VII Rapid tests in bovine animals.

( c ) Primary molecular testing referred to in Annex X, Chapter C, point 3.2(c)(i) of Regulation (EC) No 999/2001.

Image 16

Table E

Genotyping

Number of animals

Positive animals genotyped ( a ) ( b )

Randomly selected animals genotyped ( a ) ( c )

Animals in scrapie infected flocks genotyped ( d )

Ewes genotyped under the framework of a breeding programme ( e )

Rams genotyped under the framework of a breeding programme ( e )

( a ) Member States may opt not to fill in this field and instead declare that the relevant data reported to the Commission in accordance with Article 6(4) of Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 shall be considered for the purposes of this report.

( b ) As required by Annex III, Chapter A, Part II, point 8.1 of Regulation (EC) No 999/2001.

( c ) As required by Annex III, Chapter A, Part II, point 8.2 of Regulation (EC) No 999/2001.

( d ) In accordance with Annex VII, Chapter A, point 2.3 of Regulation (EC) No 999/2001.

( e ) In accordance with Article 6a of Regulation (EC) No 999/2001.

Table F

Culling of animals

Number of animals

Bovine animals culled and destroyed ( a )

Ovine and caprine animals culled and destroyed ( b )

Compulsory slaughter in scrapie infected flocks ( c )

Number of animals

Ovine and caprine animals slaughtered

( a ) In accordance with Annex VII, Chapter B, point 2.1 of Regulation (EC) No 999/2001.

( b ) In accordance with Annex VII, Chapter B, point 2.2.2(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 999/2001.

( c ) In accordance with Annex VII, Chapter B, point 2.2 of Regulation (EC) No 999/2001.

---

ANNEX VIII

Final technical report on avian influenza surveillance programmes

Image 17

Member State: Date: Year:

Table A

Poultry Holdings ( a ) sampled

Serological investigation according to Annex I to Commission Decision 2010/367/EU ( 1 )

Poultry category ( b )

NUTS 2 code ( c )

Total number of holdings ( d )

Total number of holdings sampled

Number of samples per holding

Methods of laboratory analysis

Total number of tests performed per method

Total

( 1 ) OJ L 166, 1.7.2010, p. 22.

( a ) Holdings or flocks or establishments as appropriate.

( b ) broilers/fattening turkeys/chicken breeders/turkey breeders/laying hens/free range laying hens/ratites/farmed feathered game (pheasants, partridges, quails...)/ducks geese or mallards/‘backyard flocks’/others.

( c ) Refers to the location of the holding of origin. In case NUTS (Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics) 2 cannot be used, coordinates (long/lat) or region, as defined in the programme of the Member State, are requested.

( d ) Total number of holdings of one category of poultry in concerned NUTS 2 or region.

Table B

WILD BIRDS — Investigation according to the surveillance programme for avian influenza in wild birds set out in Annex II to Decision 2010/367/EU

NUTS 2 code ( a )

Total number of birds sampled

Total number of samples tested for passive surveillance

Total

( a ) Refers to the place of collection of birds/samples. In case NUTS 2 code cannot be used, coordinates (long/lat) or region, as defined in the programme of the Member State, are requested.

---

ANNEX IX

Report on fish disease programmes

Image 18

1. Diseases ( a )

1.1. Fish

VHS

IHN

ISA

KHV

1.2. Molluscs

Marteilia refringens

Bonamia ostreae

1.3. Crustaceans

White spot disease

2. General information on the programmes

2.1. Competent Authority ( b )

2.2. Organisation, supervision of all stakeholders involved in the programme ( c )

2.3. Duration of the programme

( a ) Disease and species if necessary.

( b ) A description shall be provided of the structure, competencies, duties and powers of the Competent Authority or Competent Authorities involved.

( c ) A description shall be provided of the authorities in charge of the supervision and coordination of the programme and the different operators involved.

3. Data on testing animals

Member State, Zone or Compartment ( a )

Disease: Year:

Farm or mollusc farming area

Number of samplings

Number of clinical inspections

Water temperature at sampling/Inspection

Species at sampling

Species sampled

Number of animals sampled (total and by species)

Number of tests

Positive results of laboratorial examination

Positive results of clinical inspections

Total

Total

( a ) Member State, zone or compartment as defined in the approved programme.

Image 19

4. Data on testing farms or farming areas

Disease: Year:

Member State, Zone or Compart-ment ( a )

Total number of farms or mollusc farming areas ( b )

Total number farms or mollusc farming areas under the programme

Number of farms or mollusc farming areas checked ( c )

Number of positive farms or mollusc farming areas ( d )

Number of new positive farms or mollusc farming areas ( e )

Number of farms or mollusc farming areas depopulated

% positive farms or mollusc farming areas depopulated

Animals removed and disposed of ( f )

TARGET INDICATORS

% farms or mollusc farming areas coverage

% positive farms or mollusc farming areas

period farms or mollusc farming areas prevalence

% new positive farms or mollusc farming areas

farms or mollusc farming areas incidence

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 = (7/5) × 100

9

10 = (4/3) × 100

11 = (5/4) × 100

12 = (6/4) × 100

Total

(a) Member State, zone or compartment as defined in the approved programme.

(b) Total number of farms or mollusc farming areas existing in the Member State, Zone or Compartment as defined in the approved programme.

(c) Check means to perform a farm/mollusc farming area level test under the programme for the respective disease with the purpose of upgrading the health status of the farm/mollusc farming area. In this column a farm/mollusc farming area must not be counted twice even if has been checked more than once.

(d) Farms or mollusc farming areas with at least one positive animal during the period independent of the number of times the farms or mollusc farming areas has been checked.

(e) Farms or mollusc farming areas the health status of which in the previous period was, in accordance with Part A of Annex III to Directive 2006/88/EC, category I, category II, category III or category IV and which have at least one positive animal in this period.

In the case of programmes submitted before 1 August 2008, Farms or mollusc farming areas which were not positive to the disease in question in the previous period and have at least one positive animal in this period.

(f) Animals × 1000 or total weight of animals removed and disposed of.

---

ANNEX X

PART I

Report on activities and costs

Image 20

Table A ( a )

Eligible measures

Number of units

1 ( b )

2 ( b )

Financing on the basis of costs actually incurred ( c )

Financing on the basis of unit costs

Co-funding rate

Claimed amount

Declared total cost actually incurred ( d )

Ceiling per unit

Total cost after applica-tion of ceiling

Unit costs ( b )

(100 %)

Eligible cost declared on the basis of unit costs ( d ) ( e )

Sampling

Total sampling

%

Testing

Total testing

%

Vaccination

Total vaccination

%

Compensation

Total compensation

%

Other eligible measures

Total other eligible measures

%

Total

3

4

%

Total amount claimed ( c )( f )

( a ) In case of intermediate report fill in two separate tables, one for the results of the first 6 months and one for the forecast of the last 6 months of the year.

( b ) For each eligible measure fill in either column 1 or 2 in line with the method of co-funding specified in the financing decision.

( c ) ‘Incurred’ in the sense of the present Decision means costs for measures implemented from 1 January to 31 December of the year of implementation of the programme, and paid at the latest on the date of submission of the claim for reimbursement

( d ) ‘Incurred’ in the case of final report and payment application, ‘expected to be incurred’ in case of intermediate report.

( e ) The defined unit cost at 100 % multiplied by the number of units.

( f ) Sum of cells 3 and 4 after the application of the co-funding rate.

Image 21

Table B ( a )

Additional information on compensation ( b )

Region

Species of animals

Culled and destroyed/Slaughtered

Number of compensated animals

Total cost of compensated animals

Cost of animals compensated by 90 calendar days

Cost of animals compensated between 90 & 120 calendar days

Cost of animals compensated between 121 & 150 calendar days

Cost of animals compensated between 151 & 180 calendar days

Cost of animals compensated between 181 & 210 calendar days

Cost of animals compensated after 210 calendar days

Amount received for salvage

Total

( a ) To be filled in only for final reports and in case eligible costs include amounts for the compensation paid to owners for their animals or products slaughtered or culled/destroyed.

( b ) Data to be given in national currency, VAT excluded.

Image 22

Table C ( a )

Additional information on compensation ( b ) for zoonotic Salmonella control programmes

Poultry population

Compensation

Number of animals and eggs compensated

Total cost of animals and eggs compensated

Compensa-tion made by 90 calendar days

Compensa-tion made between 91 & 120 calendar days

Compensa-tion made between 121 & 150 calendar days

Compensa-tion made between 151 & 180 calendar days

Compensa-tion made between 181 & 210 calendar days

Total compensa-tion paid

Culled animals

Destroyed eggs

Heat-treated non incubated hatching eggs ( c )

Culled animals

Destroyed eggs

Heat-treated non incubated hatching eggs ( c )

without salvage value

with salvage value ( c )

without salvage value

with salvage value ( c )

Breeders

Layers

Broilers

Breeding turkeys

Fattening turkeys

Total

0

0

0

0

0,00

0,00

0,00

0,00

0,00

0,00

0,00

0,00

0,00

0,00

( a ) To be filled in only for final reports.

( b ) Compensation paid to owners for the value of their birds slaughtered or culled, destroyed eggs and heat treated non incubated hatching eggs. Data shall be given in national currency, VAT excluded.

( c ) The salvage value shall be deducted from the compensation.

PART II

PART II

Signed declaration to accompany the final report/payment application

Signed declaration to accompany the final report/payment application

Member State:

Programme:

Year of implementation:

We certify that:

We certify that:

| — | the information provided in the final report and payment application is full, reliable and true that the declared activities were actually performed and that the cost declared are accurately accounted for and eligible under the provision of Decision .../Regulation (EC) No ... (mention specific financing decision); .... |
| --- | --- |

—

the information provided in the final report and payment application is full, reliable and true that the declared activities were actually performed and that the cost declared are accurately accounted for and eligible under the provision of Decision .../Regulation (EC) No ... (mention specific financing decision); ....

the information provided in the final report and payment application is full, reliable and true that the declared activities were actually performed and that the cost declared are accurately accounted for and eligible under the provision of Decision .../Regulation (EC) No ... (mention specific financing decision); ....

| — | all supporting documents relating to the activities and expenditure are available for inspection, notably to justify the level of compensation for animals; |
| --- | --- |

—

all supporting documents relating to the activities and expenditure are available for inspection, notably to justify the level of compensation for animals;

all supporting documents relating to the activities and expenditure are available for inspection, notably to justify the level of compensation for animals;

| — | the programme was executed in accordance with the relevant Union legislation, in particular the rules on competition, the award of public contracts and state aid; |
| --- | --- |

—

the programme was executed in accordance with the relevant Union legislation, in particular the rules on competition, the award of public contracts and state aid;

the programme was executed in accordance with the relevant Union legislation, in particular the rules on competition, the award of public contracts and state aid;

| — | no other Union contribution was requested for this programme and all revenue accruing from operations under the programme is declared to the Commission; |
| --- | --- |

—

no other Union contribution was requested for this programme and all revenue accruing from operations under the programme is declared to the Commission;

no other Union contribution was requested for this programme and all revenue accruing from operations under the programme is declared to the Commission;

| — | control procedures apply, in particular to verify the accuracy of the amount of activities and expenditure declared, to prevent, detect and correct irregularities. |
| --- | --- |

—

control procedures apply, in particular to verify the accuracy of the amount of activities and expenditure declared, to prevent, detect and correct irregularities.

control procedures apply, in particular to verify the accuracy of the amount of activities and expenditure declared, to prevent, detect and correct irregularities.

Date

Date

Name and signature of operational director

Name and signature of operational director

---