alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 632.15 Eligible uses and treatment of reclaimed lands. ( a ) Reclaimed lands and water may be used for cropland, hayland, pasture land, rangeland, woodland, wildlife land, natural areas, noncommercial recreation land, and the supporting uses associated with these land uses. Other land uses proposed by public entities for public use and benefit such as open space, conservation uses, natural areas, and recreation sites may be approved by the NRCS State conservationist in accordance with the priorities stated in § 632.12. However, development of public sites, such as the installation of recreation facilities, is not eligible for cost sharing.
( b ) Reclaimed land use is determined by the objectives of the land user, compatibility of the land use with surrounding land use, and the practicability and feasibility of restoring the soil and water resources to support the use selected.
( c ) The maximum acreage of eligible lands and water that may be offered for contract under one ownership is 320 acres for the life of the program.
( d ) Conservation treatment eligible for Federal cost sharing includes the combination of practices needed and feasible to achieve: ( 1 ) Protection of life, property, and elimination of public health and safety hazards, including land stabilization.
( 2 ) Restoration of the environment where degraded by past mining, including water quality, visual quality, recreation resources, fish and wildlife habitat, and erosion and sediment control.
( 3 ) A site that can be developed for a beneficial use as specified in § 632.15(a). Examples of eligible treatment that may be cost shared include but are not limited to: Land shaping and grading, critical area planting or other plantings for stabilization, improving visual quality, wildlife food and cover, diversions or terraces, waterways or lined ditches, grade stabilization structures, sediment basins, and special practices for sealing shafts and tunnels, correcting subsidence problems, or other unusual situations. Practices not eligible for cost sharing are those that are solely applied to develop a reclamation site (including sites developed by public entities for public use), increase the production of crops, or for the recurring maintenance of applied reclamation.
( e ) Applied conservation treatment is to meet the applicable Federal and State standards for the reclamation and conservation treatment of abandoned or inadequately reclaimed coal-mined lands and water. Where needed, these standards are incorporated in local NRCS technical guides as the NRCS standards and specifications applicable to the program. Special practices as specified in § 632.15(d) are to be developed in cooperation with appropriate State or Federal agencies having the expertise or responsibility for the practices.
( f ) NRCS State conservationists, in consultation with the State reclamation committee, are to: ( 1 ) Develop a list of practices that are eligible for cost sharing, and
( 2 ) Maintain, as applicable, lists of average costs of applying conservation treatment to eligible lands and waters.
§ 30.41 Class 6; cigar-wrapper types and groups. ( a ) *Type 61.* That type of shade-grown tobacco known as Connecticut Valley Shade-grown, produced principally in the Connecticut Valley section of Connecticut and Massachusetts.
( b ) *Type 62.* That type of shade-grown tobacco known as Georgia and Florida Shade-grown, produced principally in southwestern Georgia and in the central part of northern Florida.
Groups applicable to types 61 and 62: A—Wrappers. S—Stained. X—Brokes. N—Nondescript, as defined.
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 7, 2010 / Presidential Documents 75849 

Presidential Determination No. 2011–01 of October 6, 2010 

Waiver of Restriction on Providing Funds to the Palestinian 

Authority 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States of America, including section 7040(b) of the 

Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2010 (Division F, Public Law 111–117), as carried forward by 

the Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011, as enacted September 30, 2010 

(together, the ‘‘Act’’), I hereby certify that it is important to the national 

security interests of the United States to waive the provisions of section 

7040(a) of the Act, in order to provide funds appropriated to carry out 

Chapter 4 of Part II of the Foreign Assistance Act, as amended, to the 

Palestinian Authority. 

You are directed to transmit this determination to the Congress, with a 

report pursuant to section 7040(d) of the Act and to publish the determination 

in the Federal Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, October 6, 2010 

[FR Doc. 2010–30819 

Filed 12–6–10; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PRESDOCSOB#1.EPS</GPH>
BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, DC

        

Application of         )

        )

Caribbean Airlines Limited       )

        ) Docket DOT‐OST‐2013‐0140

For an Exemption From 49 U.S.C. §41301 )

(JFK‐Georgetown‐JFK)       )

        )

Application of         )

        )

Fly Jamaica Airways Limited     ) Docket DOT‐OST‐2013‐0136

        )

To Engage in Scheduled Combination    )

Service Between the U.S. and Guyana    )

Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. §40109     )

__________________________________________)

AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION’S NOTICE OF SERVICE

      David M. Semanchik  

      Air Line Pilots Association

      535 Herndon Parkway

      Herndon, VA  20170

      Phone:  703‐481‐2421

      Fax:  703‐481‐2478

      David.Semanchik@alpa.org

Attorney for Air Line Pilots Association

August 8, 2013

   
2 

BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, DC

        

Application of         )

        )

Caribbean Airlines Limited       )

        ) Docket DOT‐OST‐2013‐0140

For an Exemption From 49 U.S.C. §41301 )

(JFK‐Georgetown‐JFK)       )

        )

Application of         )

        )

Fly Jamaica Airways Limited     ) Docket DOT‐OST‐2013‐0136

        )

To Engage in Scheduled Combination    )

Service Between the U.S. and Guyana    )

Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. §40109     )            

__________________________________________)

AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION’S NOTICE OF SERVICE  

The Air Line Pilots Association (“ALPA”) regrets that it inadvertently did not

serve its Answer, filed on July 31, 2013, upon applicants Fly Jamaica Airways Limited

and Caribbean Airlines Limited.   Please take notice that ALPA served its Answer upon

those applicants on this day, August 8, 2013, as follows:

(By first‐class mail)

Capt. Paul Ronald Reece

Chairman & Managing Director

Fly Jamaica Airways Limited

2 Holborn Road

Kingston 10  

Jamaica, W.I.

   
3 

(By email)

Pierre Murphy

Law Offices of Pierre Murphy

1200 New Hampshire Avenue, NW

Washington, DC  20036

Email: pmurphy@lopmurphy.com

Counsel for Fly Jamaica Airways Limited

(By email)

John Maggio

Condon & Forsyth LLP

7 Times Square

New York, NY  10036

Email: jmaggio@condonlaw.com

Counsel for Caribbean Airlines Limited

Respectfully submitted,

_________________________________________   

      David M. Semanchik  

      Air Line Pilots Association

      535 Herndon Parkway

      Herndon, VA  20170

      Phone:  703‐481‐2421

      Fax:  703‐481‐2478

      David.Semanchik@alpa.org

      Attorney for Air Line Pilots Association

August 8, 2013
NO. 07-01-0179-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL A

	NOVEMBER 26, 2001

	______________________________

	GEORGE QUISENBERRY AND BETTY QUISENBERRY, APPELLANTS

	V.

	TOMMY ENGLISH AND WIFE, JANA ENGLISH,

	INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A JC TRUCKING, APPELLEES

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 110TH DISTRICT COURT OF FLOYD COUNTY;

	NO. 9307; HONORABLE JOHN R. HOLLUMS, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before BOYD, C.J., and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.

	Appellants George Quisenberry and Betty Quisenberry appeal from a default judgment entered against them in an action by appellees Tommy English and wife, Jana English, individually and d/b/a JC Trucking, to recover sums of money allegedly owed by appellants.  For the reasons expressed, we dismiss the appeal.

	The clerk’s record was filed on May 24, 2001.  However, no reporter’s record has been filed because it has not been designated by appellants.  We notified appellants by letter dated June 14, 2001, that if we did not receive the reporter’s record within 30 days, we would proceed to consider and decide those issues or points that did not require a reporter’s record for decision.  Tex. R. App. P. 37.3 (c).  We next notified appellants by letter dated October 25, 2001, that they had not filed a brief or a motion for extension of time to file one, and that unless a response reasonably explaining that failure, together with a showing that appellees have not been significantly injured due to such failure was received by November 6, 2001, we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.  Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).  No such response has been received.  

	Accordingly, the appeal must be and hereby is dismissed.

							John T. Boyd

							 Chief Justice

Do not publish.
#### § 915.63 Effective time.

The provisions of this part shall become effective at such time as the Secretary may declare above his signature to this part, and shall continue in force until terminated in one of the ways specified in § 915.64.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 10566 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
VANESSA MAYO , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:10

- CR

- 21

- 1

Before KING, ELROD, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Vanessa Mayo appeals the above

- guidelines sentence imposed for the third revocation of her supervised release. She argues only that the 30

- month sentence is substantively unreasonable. Given Mayo ’s objection at sentencing, we review her substantive reasonableness challenge under the “plainly unreasonable” standard. See United States v. M iller , 634 F.3d 841, 843 (5th Cir. 2011). Mayo’s arguments ,

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 21, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-10566 Document: 00514395719 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/21/2018No. 17

- 10566

2 however, essentially amount to a disagreement with the district court’s assessment of the sentencing factors, which this court will not reweigh. See Gall v. United States , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007) . Thus, Mayo has failed to show
that the sentence is substantively unreasonable. See M iller , 634 F.3d at 843; United States v. W hitelaw , 580 F.3d 256, 260 (5th Cir. 2009); s ee, e.g., United States v. Kippers , 685 F.3d 491, 500

- 01 (5th Cir. 2012). Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. Case: 17-10566 Document: 00514395719 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/21/2018
Exhibit 35
                                   ----------


                       COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                              OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                     ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                   CWALT, INC.
                         ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2006-OC9
               MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-OC9


      The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant to Section
3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i)   A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the Agreement
has been made under my supervision; and

(ii)  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
throughout such calendar year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                      Dated: March 14, 2007
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
211.602 General.    (S-90) The HCOs shall perform the functions of the procuring activity Defense Priorities and Allocations System officers as prescribed in DoD 4400.1M, Defense Production Act Programs (e.g., handle requests for special priorities assistance).       Submit request to the PL21, Contract Policy Branch to serve as the liaison between DISA and DPC. **Parent topic:** SUBPART 211.6 — PRIORITIES AND ALLOCATIONS
252.228-7000 Reimbursement for War-Hazard Losses.       As prescribed in                 228.371              (a), use the following clause:          REIMBURSEMENT FOR WAR-HAZARD LOSSES (DEC 1991)          (a)  Costs for providing employee war-hazard benefits in accordance with paragraph (b) of the Workers' Compensation and War-Hazard Insurance clause of this contract are allowable if the Contractor—          (1)  Submits proof of loss files to support payment or denial of each claim;          (2)  Subject to Contracting Officer approval, makes lump sum final settlement of any open claims and obtains necessary release documents within one year of the expiration or termination of this contract, unless otherwise extended by the Contracting Officer; and          (3)  Provides the Contracting Officer at the time of final settlement of this contract—          (i)  An investigation report and evaluation of any potential claim; and          (ii)  An estimate of the dollar amount involved should the potential claim mature.          (b)  The cost of insurance for liabilities reimbursable under this clause is not allowable.          (c)  The Contracting Officer may require the Contractor to assign to the Government all right, title, and interest to any refund, rebate, or recapture arising out of any claim settlements.          (d)  The Contractor agrees to—          (1)  Investigate and promptly notify the Contracting Officer in writing of any occurrence which may give rise to a claim or potential claim, including the estimated amount of the claim;          (2)  Give the Contracting Officer immediate written notice of any suit or action filed which may result in a payment under this clause; and          (3)  Provide assistance to the Government in connection with any third party suit or claim relating to this clause which the Government elects to prosecute or defend in its own behalf.          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 252.228 RESERVED
246.870-3 Contract clauses.       (a)(1)  Except as provided in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, use the clause at                 252.246-7007             , Contractor Counterfeit Electronic Part Detection and Avoidance System, in solicitations and contracts when procuring—          (i)  Electronic parts;          (ii)  End items, components, parts, or assemblies containing electronic parts; or          (iii)  Services, if the contractor will supply electronic parts or components, parts, or assemblies containing electronic parts as part of the service.          (2)  Do not use the clause in solicitations and contracts that are set aside for small business.          (b) Use the clause at 252.246-7008 , Sources of Electronic Parts, in solicitations and contracts, including solicitations and contracts using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services, when procuring—          (1)  Electronic parts;          (2)  End items, components, parts, or assemblies containing electronic parts; or          (3)  Services, if the contractor will supply electronic parts or components, parts, or assemblies containing electronic parts as part of the service.    **Parent topic:** 246.870 Contractors Counterfeit Electronic Part Detection and Avoidance.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3278 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mini DVD camcorder. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 26, 2006 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mini DVD camcorder. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MINI DVD CAMCORDER. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.85.25 Mini-DVD camcorder, full multiformat 

readability with patented laser processor 

technology; 1.3 mega pixel CCD, optical 

zoom, USB 2.0 PC (provided for in subheading 8525.40.80) ................................ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 3278 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
###### Editorial Note on [Subchapter A of Chapter VIII](/current/title-7/chapter-VIII/subchapter-A)

#### Authority:

[7 U.S.C. 71-87K](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/7/71), [1621-1627](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/7/1621).

###### Editorial Note on [Subchapter A of Chapter VIII](/current/title-7/chapter-VIII/subchapter-A)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at [84 FR 45645](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/84-FR-45645), Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 810.1004 Grades and grade requirements for oats.

| Grade | Minimum limits— | | Maximum limits— | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Test weight per bushel (pounds) | Sound oats (percent) | Heat-damaged kernels (percent) | Foreign material (percent) | Wild oats (percent) |
| U.S. No. 1 | 36.0 | 97.0 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| U.S. No. 2 | 33.0 | 94.0 | 0.3 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| U.S. No. 31 | 30.0 | 90.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| U.S. No. 42 | 27.0 | 80.0 | 3.0 | 5.0 | 10.0 |
| U.S. Sample grade— | | | | | |
| U.S. Sample grade are oats which: | | | | | |
| (a) Do not meet the requirements for the grades U.S. Nos. 1, 2, 3, or 4; or | | | | | |
| (b) Contain 8 or more stones which have an aggregate weight in excess of 0.2 percent of the sample weight, 2 or more pieces of glass, 3 or more crotalaria seeds (*Crotalaria* spp.), 2 or more castor beans (*Ricinus communis* L.), 4 or more particles of an unknown foreign substance(s) or a commonly recognized harmful or toxic substance(s), 8 or more cocklebur (*Xanthium* spp.) or similar seeds singly or in combination, 10 or more rodent pellets, bird droppings, or equivalent quantity of other animal filth per 11/8 to 11/4 quarts of oats; or | | | | | |
| (c) Have a musty, sour, or commercially objectionable foreign odor (except smut or garlic odor); or | | | | | |
| (d) Are heating or otherwise of distinctly low quality. | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 Oats that are slightly weathered shall be graded not higher than U.S. No. 3. | | | | | |
| 2 Oats that are badly stained or materially weathered shall be graded not higher than U.S. No. 4. | | | | | |
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-13-0212 SAT Date: 1/18/2013 Print Date: 5/5/2014

Related cases :

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1-2 1

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 3 1 1 Anion 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 2

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: N o
Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Inhalation Ecotox: N o releases to water Fate: ;
Keywords : Keywords: LUNG, IRR-MM, SENS, DEVEL
Summary of Assessment :

Fate : Fate Summary: P-13-0212-13 FATE: Estimations for low weight MW 373 log Kow = 4.26 (E) log Koc = 1.86 (E) log Fish BCF = 0.50 (E) log Fish BAF = 1.48 (E) FATE: Estimations for M W 257 log Kow = 5.47 (E) log Koc = 4.16 (E) log Fish BCF = 1.90 (E)log Fish BAF = 3.14 (E) FATE: Estimations for log Kow = -1.00 (M) log Koc = 1.00 (E) log Fish BCF = 0.50 (E) log Fish BAF = -0.05 (E) FATE: Estimations for log Kow = -1.31 (M) log Koc = 0.07 (E) log Fish BCF = 0.50 (E) log Fish BAF = -0.05 (E) PMN Substance: Liquid with MP = -20 C (Sub. Est.) S = Dispersible (E) VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E) BP > 400 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) POTW removal (%) = Anion 90 via sorption; 90 via sorption; 90; 90 via biodeg Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = Anion wk-mo; wk; da-wk; da Sorption to soils/sediments = moderate - strong PBT Potential: Anion P3B1; P1B2; P1B1; P1B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = slow - moderate

Health : Health Summary: Absorption is poor through the skin, moderate through the GI tract, and good through the lungs based on analogs. There is concern for irritation to mucous membranes and lung effects if inhaled based on the surfactant properties of the PMN material and concern for sensitization and developmental toxicity for Low moderate concern.

Ecotox :
Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 >100 daphnid 48-h LC50 >100 green algal 96-h EC50 >100 fish

_ chronic value >10 daphnid

_ chronic value >10

algal

_ chronic >10value Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for anionic surfactants; SAR chemical class = MW 434 (major component); liquid; S = dispersible in water at 25 C (P); p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness < 150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 1000

SARs anionic surfactants SAR Class Ecotox Category Anionic Surfactants

Ecotox Factors Comments:

SAT Chair: Becky Jones
#### § 955.92 Order with marketing agreement.

Each signatory hereby requests the Secretary to issue, pursuant to the Act, an order providing for regulating the handling of Vidalia onions in the same manner as is provided for in this agreement.
#### Cara Campisi, Respondent, v Bronx Water & Sewer Service, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

[814 NYS2d 526]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered December 29, 2005, which, to the extent appealed from, denied the motion of defendant Bronx Water & Sewer Service (BWSS) for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff raised issues of fact as to whether the defect in the roadway was caused by BWSS, which allegedly performed excavation at or near the accident site. Therefore, the motion court correctly denied BWSS’s summary judgment motion *(Parnes v City of New York,*298 AD2d 274 [2002]). Concur— Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Marlow and Malone, JJ.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2909 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Nemacur VL. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 19, 2006 

Mr. BURR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Nemacur 

VL. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NEMACUR VL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.60 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Nemacur VL) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and 

7 inserting ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•S 2909 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with BILLS