alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 900.32 Informal rulemaking. USDA may elect to use informal rulemaking procedures under 553 of Title 5, United States Code, to amend Federal milk marketing agreements and orders, other than provisions that directly affect milk prices. In making this determination, consideration shall be given to: ( a ) The nature and complexity of the proposal;
( b ) The potential regulatory and economic impacts on affected entities; and
( c ) Any other relevant matters.
§ 920.53 Modification, suspension, or termination of regulations. ( a ) In the event the committee at any time finds that, by reason of changed conditions, any regulations issued pursuant to § 920.52 should be modified, suspended, or terminated, it shall so recommend to the Secretary.
( b ) Whenever the Secretary finds from the recommendations and information submitted by the committee or from other available information, that a regulation should be modified, suspended, or terminated with respect to any or all shipments of kiwifruit in order to effectuate the declared policy of the act, the Secretary shall modify, suspend, or terminate such regulation. If the Secretary finds that a regulation obstructs or does not tend to effectuate the declared policy of the act, the Secretary shall suspend or terminate such regulation. On the same basis and in like manner the Secretary may terminate any such modification or suspension.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

VIRGIN RECORDS AMERICA, )

INC., a California )

Company, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 

) 3:06cv631-MHT

RICKY WILLIAMS, ) (WO)

)

Defendant. )

INJUNCTION AND JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT

In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered

this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of this

court that:

(1) Plaintiffs Virgin Records America, Inc., Sony BMG

Music Entertainment, UMG Recordings, Inc., and BMG

Music’s motion for entry of default judgment (Doc. No. 8)

is granted.

Case 3:06-cv-00631-MHT-VPM Document 11 Filed 10/27/2006 Page 1 of 4
2

(2) Plaintiffs Virgin Records America, Inc., Sony BMG

Music Entertainment, UMG Recordings, Inc., and BMG Music

shall have and recover $ 4,500.00 from defendant Ricky

Williams.

(3) Defendant Ricky Williams, his officers, agents,

servants, employees, and attorneys, and those persons in

active concert or participation with them who receive

actual notice of this injunction and judgment by personal

service or otherwise, are each jointly and separately

ENJOINED and RESTRAINED:

(a) From directly or indirectly infringing plaintiffs

Virgin Records America, Inc., Sony BMG Music

Entertainment, UMG Recordings, Inc., and BMG Music’s

copyright rights under federal or state law, whether now

in existence or later created, that is owned or

controlled by the plaintiffs (or any parent, subsidiary,

or affiliate record label of the plaintiffs) (“the

plaintiffs’ recordings”), including without limitation,

by using the Internet or any online media distribution

Case 3:06-cv-00631-MHT-VPM Document 11 Filed 10/27/2006 Page 2 of 4
3

system to reproduce (i.e., download) any of the

plaintiffs' recordings, to distribute (i.e., upload) any

of the plaintiffs' recordings, or to make any of the

plaintiffs' recordings available for distribution to the

public, except pursuant to a lawful license or with the

express authority of the plaintiffs.

(b) From failing to destroy, within five days of

notice of this injunction and judgment, all copies of the

plaintiffs' recordings that defendant Williams has

downloaded onto any computer hard drive or server without

the plaintiffs’ authorization and shall destroy all

copies of those downloaded recordings transferred onto

any physical medium or device in defendant Williams’s

possession, custody, or control.

It is the further ORDER of this court that costs are

taxed against the defendant Williams in the amount of

$ 420.00, for which execution may issue.

The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this

document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant

Case 3:06-cv-00631-MHT-VPM Document 11 Filed 10/27/2006 Page 3 of 4
to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

DONE this 27th day of October, 2006.

_____________________________ /s/ Myron H. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00631-MHT-VPM Document 11 Filed 10/27/2006 Page 4 of 4
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Hubert C. Jordan, Appellant.

Brink, J.

Appeal from an order dismissing a petition in the nature of a writ of *coram nobis*without a hearing. The defendant was convicted of the crime of grand larceny, second degree, on the 7th day of October, 1959, upon his plea of guilty. He was given a suspended sentence and placed on probation for a period of one year. It is conceded that at no time did *585the court comply with the provisions of section 335-b of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Under these circumstances, the conviction was void. *(People ex rel. Colam*v. *La Vallee,*14 N Y 2d 83.) This is true as to a conviction upon a plea of guilty regardless of whether the defendant was prejudiced or not. *(People ex rel. Colan*v. *La Vallee,*supra;*People*v. *Porter,*14 N Y 2d 785.) The defendant at the time of the commencement of this proceeding was confined in jail under a subsequent commitment on another charge. A writ of habeas corpus was not available to test the validity of the conviction involved in this proceeding. The *coram nobis*remedy has been extended where there is a showing of a denial of due process requiring corrective judicial procedure. *(People*v. *Codarre,*10 N Y 2d 361, 363; *People*v. *Wilson,*13 N Y 2d 277, 281, app. dsmd. 377 U. S. 925.) Order reversed, on the law and the facts; petition granted; and judgment of conviction vacated. Case remanded to the County Court of Chenango County for rearraignment of the defendant. Gibson, P. J., Reynolds and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur with Brink, J. Herlihy, J. I dissent and vote to affirm. The statute has to do with the question of sentence and there is no showing of harm or prejudice in view of the fact that the defendant received a suspended sentence.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3143 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3143

               To suspend temporarily the duty on Diuron.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

 Mr. Chambliss introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
               To suspend temporarily the duty on Diuron.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DIURON.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.13.26       Formulations of 3- Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         (3,4-                                                              31/2009
                         dichlorophenyl)-1
                         ,1-dimethylurea
                         (CAS No. 330-54-
                         1) (Diuron) and
                         application
                         adjuvants
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         3808.30.15)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 956.88 Effect of termination or amendment. Unless otherwise expressly provided by the Secretary, the termination of this subpart or of any regulation issued pursuant to this subpart, or the issuance of any amendments to either thereof, shall not: ( a ) Affect or waive any right, duty, obligation, or liability which shall have arisen or which may thereafter arise in connection with any provision of this subpart;
( b ) Release or extinguish any violation of this subpart or of any regulations issued under this subpart; and
( c ) Affect or impair any rights or remedies of the Secretary or of any other person with respect to any such violations.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE SKANSKA USA CIVIL

SOUTHEAST INC., AND 

SKANSKA USA, INC., AS OWNERS 

OF THE BARGE KS 5531, 

PRAYING FOR EXONERATION 

FROM LIMITATION OF LIABILITY

Case No. 3:20-cv-5980-LC-HTC

________________________________/

ORDER SETTING HEARING

As stated in open court, a hearing will be held before the undersigned on 

Monday, July 19, 2021, at 11:00 AM CT, in Courtroom 3N, United States 

District Court, One North Palafox, Pensacola, FL, to address pending disputes 

related to Skanska’s ESI discovery, to include the following matters:

1. The manner and production of text messages - whether it has been 

produced in usable format and whether the burden of producing the messages in the 

manner requested by the Claimants outweighs the Claimants’ need.

2. Whether the burden to Skanska of producing ESI, based on certain 

agreed upon search terms, from 10/1/2020 to 10/31/2020 outweighs Claimants’ 

need.

3. Any unresolved objections Skanksa has to the topics sought in 

Claimants’ ESI deposition notice.

Case 3:20-cv-05980-LC-HTC Document 1207 Filed 07/14/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:20-cv-5980-LC-HTC

The parties shall all have their ESI vendor representatives available, either in 

person or by telephone, and ready to respond to questions the Court may have 

regarding the matters to be addressed at the hearing. 

Any party desiring the services of a court reporter will be responsible for 

procuring such services.

DONE AND ORDERED this 14th day of July 2021.

/s/ Hope Thai Cannon

HOPE THAI CANNON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTE:

If you or any party, witness, or attorney in this matter have a disability that requires special 

accommodation, such as a hearing impairment that requires a sign-language interpreter or 

a wheelchair restriction that requires ramp access, please contact the clerk’s office at least 

one (1) week prior to the hearing (or as soon as possible) so arrangements can be made.

Case 3:20-cv-05980-LC-HTC Document 1207 Filed 07/14/21 Page 2 of 2
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1


Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company
    for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the
    Report) fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
|
| | (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                        



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ WILLIAM J. GERVAIS 
| |                        
| | William J. Gervais     
| | Chief Executive Officer
§ 956.28 Procedure. ( a ) Four members of the Committee shall constitute a quorum, and four concurring votes shall be required to pass any motion or approve any Committee action, except that recommendations made pursuant to § 956.61 shall require five concurring votes.
( b ) The committee may provide for meetings by telephone, telegraph, facsimile, or other means of communication, and any vote cast orally at such meetings shall be confirmed promptly in writing: *Provided,* That if an assembled meeting is held, all votes shall be cast in person.
[60 FR 27626, May 24, 1995, as amended at 84 FR 13516]
Exhibit 31(ii)
                                --------------


                                CERTIFICATIONS
                                --------------

I, Steve Bailey, certify that:


      1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
          10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
          report on Form 10-K of CWHEQ Revolving Home Equity Loan Trust,
          Series 2006-H (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

      2.  Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
          whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
          omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
          in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
          not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3.  Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
          information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
          covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
          reports;

      4.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
          servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance review(s)
          conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement(s) required
          in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
          disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer(s) have
          fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all
          material respects; and

      5.  All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
          criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
          reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
          asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
          accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
          13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
          except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
          of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
          this report on Form 10-K.

      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
      information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
      JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Trustee and The Bank of New York, as
      Trustee.

Date: March 30, 2007


      /s/ Steve Bailey
      -------------------------
      Steve Bailey
      Senior Managing Director, Loan Administration
#### Joseph B. Pasquino, Appellant, v. State of New York, Respondent.

(Claim No. 36423.)—

Aulisi, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims in an appropriation case, on the ground of inadequacy. Claimant’s land was a 13-acre unimproved, hilly, rocky and wooded rectangular parcel located on the north side of the Tarrytown White Plains road, also known as Route 119, a short distance from the New York State Thruway and adjacent to Exit 8. A triangular piece at the southeast corner containing .108 of an acre or 4,704 square feet was taken for the construction of an exit ramp. The experts for both sides used comparables, agreed on the most suitable use and were in substantial agreement on the value of the land before the taking. However, claimant’s expert arrived at direct damages of $9,500 which figure was based on a value considerably higher than the highest comparable he used although these properties were several miles away, level, with a better view of the Hudson River and were generally more desirable, while the State’s witness placed the damage at $1,000. It appears from the record that there is no fair basis for accepting the testimony of claimant’s expert for the value of the triangular piece and the resulting valuation of $1,000 has adequate support in the evidence. A claim is. also made for consequential damages representing the additional cost of a road built in from the southwest corner rather than the one contemplated which was to have started from the appro*884printed corner. This is an unimproved plot of land and there is no basis in the record, before us for the awarding of consequential damages. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by Aulisi, J.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

§ 800.170 When a license or authorization or approval is required. ( a ) *Requirement.* ( 1 ) Any individual who performs or represents that he or she is licensed or authorized to perform any or all inspection or Class X weighing services under the Act must be licensed or authorized by the Service to perform each service.
( 2 ) Any individual who performs or represents that he or she is licensed or authorized, or an approved weigher, to perform Class Y weighing services under the Act must be licensed or authorized, or approved, by the Service to perform this service.
( b ) *Excepted activities.* A license or authorization, or approval for weighing, under the Act and regulations is not required for ( 1 ) opening or closing a carrier or container of grain, or transporting or filing official samples, or similar laboring functions;
( 2 ) typing or filing official inspection and weighing certificates or other official forms or performing similar clerical functions;
( 3 ) performing official equipment testing functions with respect to official inspection equipment;
( 4 ) performing inspection, weighing, or scale testing functions that are not conducted for the purposes of the Act; or
( 5 ) performing scale testing functions by a State or municipal agency or by the employees of such agencies.
( c ) *30-day waiver.* A prospective applicant for a license as a sampler, inspection technician, or weighing technician may, for a period of time not to exceed 30 calendar days, help perform those official sampling, inspection, or Class X or Class Y weighing services for which the applicant desires to be licensed, under the direct physical supervision of an individual who is licensed to perform the services. The supervising individual shall be fully responsible for each function performed by the prospective applicant and shall initial any work form prepared by the prospective applicant.
( d ) *No fee by Service.* No fee will be assessed by the Service for licensing an individual employed by an agency or contractor.
( e ) *Fee by agency.* At the request of the Service, an agency may help examine an applicant for a warehouse sampler's license for competency and may assess a fee in accordance with the provisions of § 800.70. The fee shall be paid by the applicant or by the elevator that employs the applicant.
(Secs. 9, 18, Pub. L. 94-582, 90 Stat. 2875 and 2884 (7 U.S.C. 79a and 87e))
[45 FR 15810, Mar. 11, 1980, as amended at 46 FR 30325, June 5, 1981]
## F I F T H 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D 2 023

- 3081 LT Case No. 2022

- 301750

- CFDB

_____________________________ B RANDON M. F OX , Appellant,

v. S TAT E OF F LO RIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County

. Elizabeth A. Blackburn , Judge

. Asad Ali , and Robert I. Mandell , of Mandell Law , P.A., Orlando, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney Genera l , Tallahassee , a nd Stephen R. Putna m, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach , for Appellee. August 13, 2024

P ER C URIAM

. A FFIRMED

. L AMBERT , K ILBANE , and M AC I VER , JJ., concur
.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331
.

_____________________________
#### In the Matter of Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York, as Assignee of Gladys C., Respondent, v George C., Appellant.

In a paternity proceeding, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated April 23, 1979, which, after a hearing, adjudged appellant to be the father of the child in question and directed him to pay support. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The Family Court failed to set forth the essential findings upon which its order was based as required by section 165 of the Family Court Act and CPLR 4213. (See *Matter of Hawthorne v Edward S.,*31 AD2d 426; *Matter of Harris v Doley, 22*AD2d 769.) However, since the record here is complete, this court will make the required findings of fact in the interests of saving judicial time and further litigation. We find that petitioner clearly established that the mother solely dated and engaged in sexual relations with the appellant at the time of conception. Thus, it was demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that appellant is the father of the child. Titone, J. P., Lazer, Gulotta and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
Subpart 5105.1 - Dissemination of Information **Parent topic:** Part 5105 - Publicizing Contract Actions5105.101 Methods of disseminating information.    (a)(1) Prior to synopsizing in the GPE, contracting officers shall obtain concurrence on the notice for all Program Executive Office (PEO) managed programs requiring a written acquisition plan in accordance with DFARS 207.103.       (i) When the estimated dollar value of the acquisition is at least $50 million but less than $250 million, obtain the concurrence of the cognizant Program Manager.       (ii) When the estimated dollar value of the acquisition is $250 million or greater, obtain the concurrence of the cognizant PEO.5105.102 Availability of solicitations.    (a)(5)(iii)  The senior procurement executive shall make the determination that access through government point of entry (GPE) is not in the Government’s interest.  See Appendix GG for further delegation.
# 5232.7003 Policy.

****(b)****Contracting          officers shall obtain DASN(P) approval prior to providing temporary alternative methods of          submission of payment requests and receiving reports. Submit the request for approval to          DASN(P) by email at usn.pentagon.asstsecnavrdadc.mbx.pabt@us.navy.mil with the subject          “[Activity Name] DFARS 232.7002(a)(4) – Contractor Request for Submission of Payment          Requests and Receiving Reports in Non-electronic Form.”

**Parent topic:**Subpart 5232.70 - ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION AND PROCESSING OF PAYMENT REQUESTS AND RECEIVING REPORTS