alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[LETTERHEAD OF SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC.]


GMAC-RFC
2255 N. Ontario Street, Ste 400
Burbank, CA  91504
Attention: Compliance Officer


        Re: Annual Compliance Statement for RFMSI SERIES 2006-S10 TRUST

        In connection  with the loans serviced by SunTrust  Mortgage,  Inc. (the
"Company")  pursuant to the Company's Servicing  Agreement(s)/Purchase  and Sale
Agreement(s)  with  GMAC-RFC  and  any  applicable  Reconstitution  Agreement(s)
(together,  the "Transaction  Agreements"),  I, the undersigned officer,  hereby
certify the following as of December 31, 2006:

(i)  The Company  conducted a review of its  activities  during the  immediately
     preceding  calendar  year  (or  applicable  portion  thereof)  and  of  its
     performance  under the Transaction  Agreements  during such period has been
     made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the  best  of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Company  has
     fulfilled all of its obligations  under the  Transaction  Agreements in all
     material  respects  throughout  such calendar year (or  applicable  portion
     thereof),  except  that as of  January 1, 2006,  the  Company  did not have
     procedures for monitoring  compliance with requirements as specified in the
     applicable transaction agreements governing SEC Regulation AB transactions.
     To address the absence of such  procedures,  the Company's  management  has
     undertaken and completed the following  actions:  (a) completed a review of
     each  Transaction  Agreement and identified if there was specific  language
     affecting any of the Servicing  Criteria  outlined in Section 1122;  (b) to
     the degree that the Transaction  Agreements  required  specific  procedures
     related to the servicing  criteria,  the Company's  Reference Point Library
     (where all  policies and  procedures  are  maintained)  was updated to this
     effect;  (c)  for  each  pool,  a  Control  Matrix  was  completed  (and is
     maintained on a current basis)  identifying  which  Transaction  Agreements
     control each pool;  and (d)  established a monthly review process where the
     Company's  managers  review key factors of  performance  under  Transaction
     Agreements and respond to a questionnaire  indicating  compliance with such
     factors.



        IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  I do hereby  certify the  foregoing as of the date
hereof.

        /s/ John R. Purcell, Jr.

        John R. Purcell, Jr.
        Senior Vice President - Manager, Servicing Division

        Date:  February 27, 2007
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3196 

To provide for the duty-free entry of certain tramway cars and associated 

spare parts for use by the city of Seattle, Washington. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mrs. MURRAY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To provide for the duty-free entry of certain tramway cars 

and associated spare parts for use by the city of Seattle, 

Washington. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN TRAMWAY CARS AND ASSOCIATED 

4 SPARE PARTS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Commissioner of Customs 

6 shall admit free of duty 3 tramway cars (provided for in 

7 subheading 8603.10.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Sched8 ule of the United States) manufactured in Ostrava, Czech 

9 Republic, for the use by the city of Seattle, Washington 

10 and imported pursuant to a contract with the city of SeVerDate Aug 31 2005 02:37 Jun 02, 2006 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3196.IS S3196

ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 3196 IS 

1 attle, Washington, and associated spare parts for such 

2 tramway cars (provided for in applicable subheadings of 

3 heading 8607 or other headings of the Harmonized Tariff 

4 Schedule of the United States) imported pursuant to such 

5 contract, the foregoing to be entered into the customs ter6 ritory of the United States not later than December 31, 

7 2007. 

8 (b) RELIQUIDATION.—If the liquidation of the entry 

9 of any article described in subsection (a) has become final 

10 before the date of enactment of this Act, the entry shall, 

11 notwithstanding any other provision of law, be reliquidated 

12 in accordance with the provisions of this section and ap13 propriate refund of duty made at the time of reliquidation. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
Nisqually

River

Puget Sound

McAllister C er

ek

Red Salmon Cre ek

Shannon Slough

Nisqually

River

Puget Sound

McAllister C er

ek

Red Salmon Cre ek

Shannon Slough

CCP Study Area Habitat Types

Figure 3.2-2

3-11

Source: 1997 Landsat TM Image; USFWS, 2000; Ducks Unlimited, 1999; EDAW, 2002

Chapter 3 Affected Environment

Nisqually NWR Draft CCP/EIS

P:\0e01401 Nisqually\GIS\mxd\Figure3.2-2.mxd

N

0 0.5 1 0.25 Miles

1:70,000

Legend

Approved Nisqually NWR Boundary

Open Water, Salt

Open Water, Fresh

Unconsolidated Shore

Aquatic Bed

Vegetated Intertidal

Freshwater Wetland

Riparian and Forested Wetland

Upland Forest

Grassland

Agriculture

Bare Land

Developed
Connect Air 

Mr. David Christofano; 

5414 llth Street NE 

Calgary Alberta T2E 7E9 

P: 403-291-3227 

F: 403-291-3295 

info@connectair.ca 

The ownership information you requested is as follows. Mr. Gordon Peariso is a Canadian citizen 

-holding 100 class B voting shares (99%) and Mr. Mike Peariso is a Canadian citizen holding 1 

class A voting share (1 %). 

Best Regards, 

Gord Peariso 

' / ~ i::::.-·~ ,· /l/~~,~ 

Mike Peariso
PART 42 –– CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT SERVICES       SUBPART 42.15 — CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE INFORMATION                                                         42.1502 Policy.                                                            42.1503 Procedures.    SUBPART 42.15 — CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE INFORMATION     42.1502 Policy.(a) Documents to assist with Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) to include the DISA CPARS Procedures are located at https://www.ditco.disa.mil/hq/deskbooks.asp.  Current Guidance for CPARS and the User Manual are available athttps://www.cpars.gov/help.htm.42.1503 Procedures.    (a)(1)(i) Past performance assessments are a combined responsibility of the Assessing Official (AO) Assessing Official Representative (AOR), Reviewing Official (RO), and Contractor Representative (CR).       (a)(1)(ii) The contracting officer shall be assigned as the AO. The RO is at least a level above the AO. The contracting officer and Focal Point (PSD Contract Specialist) appoint AORs (Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) or Program Office Representatives) to assist the AO with writing the evaluation. If the AOR is the COR, the AOR designation shall be included in the COR appointment letter.
§ 930.85 Effect of termination or amendment. Unless otherwise expressly provided by the Secretary, the termination of this part or of any regulation issued pursuant to this part, or the issuance of any amendment to either thereof, shall not: ( a ) Affect or waive any right, duty, obligation, or liability which shall have risen or which may thereafter arise in connection with any provision of this part or any regulation issued thereunder;
( b ) Release or extinguish any violation of this part or any regulation issued thereunder;
( c ) Affect or impair any rights or remedies of the Secretary or any other person with respect to any such violation.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

WILLIAM D. BOWDEN, ) 

 )

Plaintiff, )

 )

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv665-WHA

 )

MISSION PETROLEUM CARRIERS, )

ANTONIO MARTINEZ NAVARRO, )

 )

Defendants. )

ORDER ON MOTION 

Upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (Doc. #35), and Defendant

Antonio Martinez Navarro’s Response (Doc. #44), and for good cause, it is

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion (Doc. #35) is GRANTED. It is further 

ORDERED that Defendant Navarro shall provide Plaintiff with executed

discovery responses within ten (10) days of receipt of this order. 

DONE this 1st day of May, 2007.

/s/ Wallace Capel, Jr.

WALLACE CAPEL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 45 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 1 of 1
Part 248 - RESERVED       Subpart 248.2 - (REMOVED)    **Parent topic:** Defense Federal Acquisition RegulationSubpart 248.2 - (REMOVED)       (October 01, 2001)
Subpart 1323.2 - Energy and Water Efficiency

and Renewable Energy

Parent topic: PART 1323 - ENVIRONMENT, ENERGY AND WATER EFFICIENCY, RENEWABLE

ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY, AND DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE

1323.204 Procurement exemptions.

The designee authorized to exempt the procurement of an ENERGY STAR or Federal Energy

Management Program (FEMP)-designated product as described in FAR 23.203 is set forth in CAM

1301.70.
Editorial Note on Part 91
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 91 appear at 61 FR 51350, Oct. 2 1996.

§ 91.30 Maintenance and retention of copies of certificates or analysis reports. ( a ) At least one copy of each certificate or analysis report shall be filed in the laboratory for a period of not less than 3 years either from the date of issuance of the document, from the date of voiding a certificate, or from the date last payment is made by the applicant for a reported laboratory determination, whichever is later.
( b ) Whenever any document, because of its condition, becomes unsuitable for its intended or continued use, the laboratory personnel shall make a copy of the original document.
( c ) True copies shall be retained as photocopies, microfilm, microfiche, or other accurate reproductions and durable forms of the original document. Where reduction techniques, such as microfilming are used, suitable reader and photocopying equipment shall be readily available. Such reproductions shall be treated and considered for all purposes as though they were the original documents.
( d ) All documents required to be maintained under this part shall be kept confidential and shall be disclosed only to the applicants or other persons with the applicants' knowledge and permission. Only such information as the Administrator deems relevant shall be disclosed to the public without the applicants' permission, and then, only in a suit or administrative hearing brought at the direction, or on the request, of the Administrator, or to which the Administrator or any other officer of the United States is a party.
Part 5610 - MARKET RESEARCH       Subpart 5610.000 - SCOPE OF PART                                                         5610.001 Policy.    Subpart 5610.000 - SCOPE OF PART     5610.001 Policy.    *(Added April 2008)*       (a) When to Conduct Market Research       (1) Contracting Officers have the responsibility of informing all requiring activities that, in accordance with FAR 10.001, market research is required prior to the development of new specifications and before soliciting any requisition over the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT).       (2) Contract actions awarded above the SAT shall include documentation that market research was conducted. The market research documentation may be completed using the DCG Market Research Report template. In the case of other than full and open competition, a J&A or other similar format that covers the information areas in FAR 10 and the DCG market research template may be used.       (b) Classified Procurements       (1) Classified Procurements: Market research for contracts that will be classified must be consistent with the security requirements imposed by FAR 6.302-6, National Security, where disclosure of the agency’s needs would compromise the national security. Any number of common approaches or practices for performing market research (See FAR 10.002) may be used except those where the requirement or other salient characteristics of the requirement, having National Security implications, would be disclosed in the public domain or where other aspects of the security plan for the requirement would be violated.       HQ, United States Special Operations Command       Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L-K)       SOFARS 5610       February 2007
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Hal D. Kirby, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Allied Nevada Gold Corp.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis report. 

Dated: April 13, 2009 

/s/ HAL D. KIRBY 

Hal D. Kirby 

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
PART 14 –– SEALED BIDDING
#### § 923.8 Committee.

*Committee* means the Washington Cherry Marketing Committee established pursuant to § 923.20.
**Exhibit 31**

 

**WAMU ASSET ACCEPTANCE CORP.**

** **

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

 

I, Thomas G. Lehmann, certify that:

 

1.         I have reviewed this report on Form 10–K and all reports on Form 10–D required to be filed in respect of theperiod covered by this report on Form 10–K of WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-AR13 Trust (the ‘‘Exchange Act periodic reports’’);

 

2.         Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement ofa  material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.         Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form10–D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.         Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB,and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material respects; and

 

5.         All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their relatedattestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a–18 and 15d–18 have been included as anexhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10–K. 

 

Date:  March 15, 2007

 

  /s/ Thomas G. Lehmann_________Name:  Thomas G. LehmannTitle:    President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>



<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>            JUN-30-2000

<CASH>                          12,890,206
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                    2,219,627
<ALLOWANCES>                          0
<INVENTORY>                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                15,109,833
<PP&E>                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  15,275,421
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            1,080,324
<BONDS>                         66,079,881
<COMMON>                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<OTHER-SE>                     (61,894,917)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    15,275,421
<SALES>                            273,024
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 1,353,526
<CGS>                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      146,756
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 1,775,173
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               3,470,937
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (4,932,763)
<INCOME-TAX>                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (4,932,763)
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                    (4,932,763)
<EPS-BASIC>                       (10.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (10.68)



</TABLE>
Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 12 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 12 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 12 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 3 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 12-2 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 1 of 15
Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 12-2 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 2 of 15
Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 12-2 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 3 of 15
Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 12-2 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 4 of 15
Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 12-2 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 5 of 15
Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 12-2 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 6 of 15
Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 12-2 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 7 of 15
Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 12-2 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 8 of 15
Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 12-2 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 9 of 15
Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 12-2 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 10 of 15
Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 12-2 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 11 of 15
Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 12-2 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 12 of 15
Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 12-2 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 13 of 15
Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 12-2 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 14 of 15
Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 12-2 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 15 of 15
Operators Manual 

http://download.djiinnovations.

com/downloads/phantom_3/en/Phantom_3_Professional_User_Manual_v1.2_en.pdf 

Safety Guidelines 

http://download.dji-innovations.com/downloads/phantom_3/en/Safety_Guidelines_Disclaimer_en.pdf 

Battery Guidelines 

http://download.dji

innovations.com/downloads/phantom_3/en/Intelligent_Flight_Battery_Safety_Guidelines_en.pdf
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600 

 

 NOTICE OF ERROR

To: Counsel of Record

Case Style: Parker v. Givens et al

Case Number: 2:06-cv-00649-WHA

Referenced Docket Entry - ***Notice of Correction - doc. 14

The referenced docket entry was filed in ERROR on ***September 21, 2006*** by the Clerk’ s Office

and is being STRICKEN from the docket. This resulted in an error on the docket sheet because this

should have been filed in case no. 06cv838. Please disregard this docket entry.

 

 

 

 

 

Case 2:06-cv-00649-WHA-WC Document 15 Filed 09/21/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

Case 2:06-cv-00649-WHA-WC Document 15 Filed 09/21/2006 Page 2 of 2
#### § 75.5 Exceptions.

The regulations do not apply to the inspection of grain in the United States under the U.S. Grain Standards Act, as amended (7 U.S.C. 71 *et seq.*), except to the extent that official grain samples received from the Federal Grain Inspection Service (FGIS) shall be examined for the presence of specified weed and crop seeds upon the request of FGIS.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Authority:

7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 868.13 Regulations not applicable for certain purposes.

These regulations do not apply to the inspection of grain under the United States Grain Standards Act, as amended (7 U.S.C. 71 *et seq.*) or the inspection of commodities under the United States Warehouse Act, as amended (7 U.S.C. 241 *et seq.*).
DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY 

BOARD 

Board members Eggenberger, DiNunno and Kouts, accompanied by staff members Ralph Arcaro and Don 

Wille were on site June 4-5 to review Hanford activities of Board interest. 

A. Plutonium Reclamation Facility (PRF) Explosion Recovery: The investigation team, lead by Ron Gerton, has 

completed most of its planned field work, but continues with additional research and drafting its report. The 

team continues to learn of past experiences within the Department of Energy and from the Army regarding the 

explosiveness of combinations of hydroxylamine nitrate (and hydroxylamine sulfate) and nitric acid. 

Additionally, Gerald Pollet, executive director of Heart of America Northwest, a local Hanford watchdog group, 

issued a letter to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Occupational Safety and Health 

Administration (OSHA), the DOE and the DNFSB on June 5, 1997, requesting that the EPA and OSHA 

conduct an independent investigation into the explosion "with appropriate additional expertise sought from the 

Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board and the States of Washington and Oregon." 

B. Canister Storage Building (CSB) Construction Resumption: Mowat, the CSB constructor, began limited 

construction activities at the CSB this week. As Mowat corrects additional deficiencies identified by the CSB 

accident investigation team, further construction activity will be approved by Duke and Fluor Daniel Hanford. 

C. Construction and Configuration Management: The following actions were recently taken by Fluor Daniel 

Hanford (FDH) and DOE-RL. 

1. Independent Inspection: Since November 1996, DOE-RL has been in discussion with FDH and Fluor 

Daniel Northwest (FDNW) regarding the independence of FDNW Assurance Inspectors (A/I). On June 2, 1997, 

FDH recommended that the A/I function be reassigned from FDNW to the FDH. DOE-RL approved the 

proposal on June 4, 1997. 

2. Work Completion Process: On November 7, 1996, DOE-RL requested FDH to review and take corrective 

action on the FDH work completion process (including configuration management). FDH issued its final 

response on May 8, 1997 (just before the staff's May 12-15 review). On June 3, 1997, DOE-RL responded with 

its comments and requested a revised FDH plan by June 24, 1997. 

The site representative office finds that, while these actions were appropriate, the motivation for and timing of 

the actions are questionable. 

cc: 

Board Members 

TO: G. W. Cunningham, Technical Director 

FROM: P.F. Gubanc & D.G. Ogg, Hanford Site Representatives 

SUBJECT: Activity Report for Week Ending June 6, 1997