alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications

  I, John Lingenfelter, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A and all reports on Form 10-D
     required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report
     on Form 10-K/A of MASTR Adjustable Rate Mortgages Trust, Series
     2006-OA2 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
     light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

  4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
     servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
     conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers
     have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in
     all material respects; and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
     criteria for ABS and their related attestation reports on assessment
     of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities
     required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122
     of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been
     included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed
     in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in
     such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K/A.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
     information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
     Cenlar, FSB, as Servicer; Countrywide Home Loans Servicing L.P., as
     Servicer; GMAC Mortgage, LLC f/k/a GMAC Mortgage Corporation, as Servicer;
     and IndyMac Bank, F.S.B., as Servicer.


     Dated: May 30, 2008

     /s/ John Lingenfelter
     Signature

     Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master servicer)
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, William B. Kretzmer,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of MAI Systems Corporation;

 

2. Based on my knowledge,this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisquarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

 

a)              designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

b)             evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as ofa date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “EvaluationDate”); and

 

c)              presentedin this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the EvaluationDate;

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):

 

a)              allsignificant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls whichcould adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors anymaterial weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b)             anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 

6. The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether ornot there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factorsthat could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of ourmost recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard tosignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

 
| Date: September 23, 2005 | By:    | /s/  William  B. Kretzmer |
|-------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------|
|                          |   | William  B. Kretzmer           |
|                          |   | Chief  Executive Officer       |

 

----
Subpart 5219.2 - POLICIES

Parent topic: Part 5219 - SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS

5219.201 General policy.

(a) DON policy is to utilize small business, veteran-owned small business, service-disabled veteranowned small business, HUBZone small business, small disadvantaged business, and women-owned

small business concerns to obtain its requirements. Such concerns shall have the maximum

practicable opportunity to participate both as prime contractors and as subcontractors.

(c)(8) The HCA shall assign a small business technical advisor to each office where a resident Small

Business Administration (SBA) procurement center representative (PCR) is located.

(10)(A) The review requirements are not applicable to:

(i) orders placed against single award indefinite delivery type contracts since the review is

performed prior to award of the basic contract; or

(ii) awards to small business concerns under the SBIR Program.

(10)(B) In accordance with ASN(RDA) memorandum entitled “Small Business Coordination Review

Application” dated February 2, 2016, with the exception of SeaPort, contracting officers shall

prepare the DD 2579 using the online Small Business Coordination Review (SBCR) Application (App)

and submit the form to the Small Business Professional via

https://my.navsup.navy.mil/apps/ops$sbc.home .

(e) Small business specialists are appointed in accordance with SECNAVINST 4380.9. Small

business specialists:

(1) brief the appointing authority quarterly on implementation of the activity's Small and

Disadvantaged Business Utilization (SBP) program; and

(2) conduct SBP program training sessions to ensure that contracting and technical personnel

maintain knowledge of program requirements.

(S-90) Reviews of SBP program implementation at DON contracting activities are normally

conducted as a segment of the PPMAP reviews (see 5201.691). The Director, OSBP, will establish

guidelines for the PPMAP review OSBP segment. PPMAP review OSBP segments should be

coordinated with the PPMAP review team leader. For reviews under 5201.691-2, the Director, OSBP,

will designate OSBP review team members. Associate Directors of Small Business are responsible

for implementation of the PPMAP review OSBP segment of their field contracting activities including

designating PPMAP review OSBP team members and monitoring compliance with their

recommendations. Team members should generally be Deputies for Small Business from other than

the activity under review. Associate Directors of Small Business are responsible for providing a copy

of the PPMAP review OSBP segment report(s) to the Director, OSBP.
5219.202 Specific policies.

5219.202-1 Encouraging small business participation in acquisitions.

Contracting activities should, when practicable, conduct briefings on planned acquisitions for small

business, veteran-owned small business, service-disabled veteran-owned small business, HUBZone

small business, small disadvantaged business, and women-owned small business concerns, and

Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) and Minority Institutions (MIs).
Subpart 5249.4 - TERMINATION FOR

DEFAULT

Parent topic: Part 5249 - TERMINATION OF CONTRACTS

5249.402 Termination of fixed-price contracts for default.

5249.402-8 Reporting Information.

Within five (5) calendar days after issuing the notice of the termination for default (T4D) or a change

in termination status, submit a copy of the FAPIIS entry required by FAR 42.1503(h)(1)(iii), including

changes in status of terminations, to the AGC(AI) by email at aio@navy.mil with the subject "FAR

49.402-8 - T4D" followed by the contract number.

5249.403 Termination of cost-reimbursement contracts for

default.

(a) Within five (5) calendar days after issuing the notice of the termination or a change in

termination status, submit a copy of the FAPIIS entry required by FAR 42.1503(h)(1)(iii), including

changes in status of terminations, to the AGC(AI) by email at aio@navy.mil with the subject "FAR

49.402-8 - T4D" followed by the contract number.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-16-00145-CV

For the Best Interest of R. S.

On appeal from the

County Court at Law No 1 of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2016-CML-68-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 7, 2016
#### In the Matter of Carl A. Vergari, as District Attorney of Westchester County, Respondent, v. Andrew Marcus, Appellant.

In a proceeding pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 3353 of the Public Health Law to determine the forfeiture of an automobile, the owner thereof appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated October 17, 1968, which granted the petition. Judgment reversed, on the law, with costs; proceeding dismissed; and petitioner directed to return the automobile to appellant. The findings of fact below are affirmed. The automobile is a 1968 Chevrolet Corvette valued at approximately $6,000. The proceeding was based on the use thereof by the owner to transport a quantity of marijuana in violation of subdivision 1 of section 3353 of the Public Health Law. The 21-year-old owner of the automobile admits the facts for the purpose of this appeal. He has already pleaded guilty to one misdemeanor count in satisfaction of two indictments containing three criminal counts, arising out of his possession and sale of marijuana. No sentence has been imposed as yet. Appellant’s attack here is on the constitutionality of the above-mentioned statute, which authorizes the forfeiture of this vehicle without a jury trial. Section 2 of article I of the New York State Constitution provides: *“*Trial by jury in all cases in which it has heretofore been guaranteed by constitutional provision shall remain inviolate forever”. In *Colon*v. *Lisk*(13 App. Div. 195, affd. 153 N. Y. 188) a statute similar to the one under attack here was declared unconstitutional for the reason advanced here, as well as for other constitutional infirmities (see, also, *People ex rel. Lemon*v. *Elmore,*256 N. Y. 489; *Lawton*v. *Steele,*119 N. Y. 226, affd. 152 U. S. 133). The principles expressed in those cases are still viable; they are applicable in the instant ease to strike down the statute insofar as it authorizes the forfeiture of this vehicle without a jury trial. The automobile is not contraband; nor is it a nuisance *639per se. Moreover, the additional penalty, effected by the use of this statutory procedure, may not fairly be imposed without the constitutional safeguard of a jury trial because there is no urgency or expediency that requires a summary disposition. There is no reasonable basis for permitting this legislation to eliminate the plain constitutional right set forth in section 2 of article I. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Benjamin and Martuseello, JJ., concur.
§ 905.150 Eligibility requirements for public member and alternate member. ( a ) The public member shall be neither a producer nor a handler of Florida citrus fruit and shall have no direct financial interest in the production or marketing of citrus fruit (except as a consumer of agricultural products).
( b ) The public member should be able to devote sufficient time and express a willingness to attend Committee activities regularly and become familiar with the background and economics of the industry.
( c ) The public member must be a resident of the production area.
( d ) The public member should be nominated by the Citrus Administrative Committee and should serve a 2-year term which coincides with the term of office of grower members of the Committee.
[43 FR 32397, July 27, 1978, as amended at 88 FR 89280, Dec. 27, 2023]
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of DRAYTON HARBOR RESOURCES, INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bhupinder Singh Malhi, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: April 9, 2008
|-------------------

|By: Name:
Title: | /s/ Bhupinder Singh Malhi Bhupinder Singh Malhi
President and principal executive officer
|---------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2728 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2728

     To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Pigment Red 185.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 4, 2006

 Mr. Reed (for himself and Mr. Chafee) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Pigment Red 185.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PIGMENT RED 185.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.32.26 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Pigment Red 185) is amended 
by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
5231.205-91 Compensation for services.

Submit annual reports for DoD Waivers of the Contractor Employee Compensation Cap to DASN(P)

no later than October 31 by email at usn.pentagon.asstsecnavrdadc.mbx.pabt@us.navy.mil with the

subject “[Activity Name] NMCARS 5231.205-91 DoD Waivers of the Contractor Employee

Compensation Cap” using the reporting guidance provided in Annex 23.

Parent topic: 5231.205 Selected costs.
November 30, 2007 7 0

Ms. Judith M. Katz 2) Director, Air Protection Division

EPA Region III (3APOO)

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA, 19103-2029Dear Ms. Katz:

This letter is intended to supplement the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE)

July 27, 2007, State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision titled the “Implementation, Maintenance

and Enforcement of the 8-Hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard State

implementation plan,” SIP number 07-06, dated June 15, 2007. That submittal identified how the

State of Maryland has satisfied the “infrastructure” elements for State Implementation Plans (SIPs)

required under sections 11 0(a)(2)(A) — (M) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) for the 1997 8-hour Ozone

national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). With respect to the adequate contingency plans

required under section 11 0(a)(2)(G). we believe that COMAR 26.11.05, Air Pollution Episode

System, currently in the Maryland SIP, codified at 40 CFR 52.1070(c), is adequate to meet this

requirement.If you have any questions regarding this submittal, or require additional information, pleasecontact Mr. George (Tad) S. Aburn, Jr., Director of the Air and Radiation Management

Administration at 410-537-3255, toll-free at 800-633-6101, or via email gaburnmde.state.md.us.He will be pleased to assist you.

Sincere’y,

Q%1

Shari T. Wilson

1/AL—

Secretary

Recycled Paper www.mde.state.md.us TTY Users: 1-800-735-2258

Via Maryland Relay Service
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Billy Wayne Marcy, Appellant

No. 06

- 14

- 00155

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 6th District Court of Red River County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No.
CR01988 ). Opinion delivered by Justice Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the

judgment of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgment to delete the

attorney fees assessed

. As modified, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

We note that the appellant, Billy Wayne Marcy, has adequately indicated his inability to

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED J ANUARY 27, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
#### § 900.111 Inquiry by the Administrator.

Upon receipt of an application for arbitration, the Administrator, through such officers or employees of the Service as he may designate, may make any inquiry deemed to be necessary or proper in order to determine whether a bona fide dispute exists, to assist the parties in reducing the dispute to well-defined issues, and to select an arbitrator who would be satisfactory to all parties.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

** **

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MAI SystemsCorporation (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, JamesD. Dolan, Chief Financial and Operating Officer of the Company, certifypursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: May 14, 2004 | By:                                    | /s/ James W. Dolan |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------|--------------------|
|               | James W. Dolan                         |
|               | Chief Financial and  Operating Officer |

 

----
#### § 774.24 Exception.

The Agency may grant an exception to any of the requirements of this section, if the proposed change is in the best financial interest of the Government and not inconsistent with the authorizing statute or other applicable law.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant To

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Meruelo Maddux Properties, Inc. on Form 10-K
for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Fred Skaggs, Chief Financial Officer of MMPI, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report, containing the financial statements, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MMPI.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |  |  |                        
|-------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|March 30, 2007 |  |  |  |                        
|               |  |  |  | /s/ FRED SKAGGS        
|               |  |  |  | Fred Skaggs            
|               |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
§ 718.106 Non-compliance and false acreage reports. ( a ) Participants who provide false or inaccurate acreage reports may be ineligible for some or all payments or benefits, subject to the requirements of § 718.102(b)(1) and (3).
( b ) [Reserved]
[80 FR 41996, July 16, 2015]
EX-35 (e)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

March 13, 2007

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.

RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for Morgan Stanley Mortgage Loan Trust
2006-12XS

Per Section 9.11 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of 9/1/2006,
the undersigned Officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Securities Administrator),
hereby certifies the following for the 2006 calendar year or portion thereof:

(A)  a review of such party's activities during the preceding calendar year or
     portion thereof and of such party's performance under this Agreement, or
     such other applicable agreement in the case of an Additional Servicer, has
     been made under such officer's supervision,

(B)  to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such party
     has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement, or such other
     applicable agreement in the case of an Additional Servicer, in all material
     respects throughout such year or portion thereof, or, if there has been a
     failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, specifying
     each such failure known to such officer and the nature and status thereof
     and

(C)  in the case of the Master Servicer, to the best of such officer's
     knowledge, each Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under its
     Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout such year, or, if
     there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material
     respect specifying each such failure known to such officer and the nature
     and status thereof.




Certified By:
/s/ Reid Denny
Reid Denny, Vice President

Certified By:
/s/ Gordon Johnson
Gordon Johnson, Assistant Secretary