alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
52.232-38 Submission of Electronic Funds

Transfer Information with Offer.

As prescribed in 32.1110(g), insert the following provision:

Submission of Electronic Funds Transfer Information with Offer (Jul 2013)

The offeror shall provide, with its offer, the following information that is required to make payment

by electronic funds transfer (EFT) under any contract that results from this solicitation. This

submission satisfies the requirement to provide EFT information under paragraphs (b)(1) and (j) of

the clause at 52.232-34, Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer-Other than System for Award

Management.

(1) The solicitation number (or other procurement identification number).

(2) The offeror’s name and remittance address, as stated in the offer.

(3) The signature (manual or electronic, as appropriate), title, and telephone number of the offeror’s

official authorized to provide this information.

(4) The name, address, and 9-digit Routing Transit Number of the offeror’s financial agent.

(5) The offeror’s account number and the type of account (checking, savings, or lockbox).

(6) If applicable, the Fedwire Transfer System telegraphic abbreviation of the offeror’s financial

agent.

(7) If applicable, the offeror shall also provide the name, address, telegraphic abbreviation, and 9-

digit Routing Transit Number of the correspondent financial institution receiving the wire transfer

payment if the offeror’s financial agent is not directly on-line to the Fedwire and, therefore, not the

receiver of the wire transfer payment.

(End of provision)

Parent topic: 52.232 [Reserved]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2933 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2933

      To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on 1-[[2-(2,4- 
dichlorophenyl)-4-propyl-1,3-dioxolan-2-yl]-methyl]-1H-1,2,4-triazole).

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 23, 2006

  Mr. Carper introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on 1-[[2-(2,4- 
dichlorophenyl)-4-propyl-1,3-dioxolan-2-yl]-methyl]-1H-1,2,4-triazole).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1-[[2-(2,4- DICHLOROPHENYL)-4-PROPYL-1,3-DIOXOLAN-2-YL]-
              METHYL]-1H-1,2,4-TRIAZOLE).

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.29.80 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 1-[[2-(2,4- dichlorophenyl)-
4-propyl-1,3-dioxolan-2-yl]-methyl]-1H-1,2,4-triazole)) is amended by 
striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 948.50 Area committees. A committee is hereby established as an administrative agency for each area. Each area committee shall be comprised of members and alternates as set forth in this section or as reestablished by § 948.53. ( a ) Area No. 1 (Western Slope): Four producers and three handlers selected as follows: Two (2) producers and one (1) handler from the counties of Eagle, Garfield, Pitkin, Moffat, and Routt, in the State of Colorado; Two (2) producers and one (1) handler from the remaining counties of Area No. 1; One (1) handler representing all producers' cooperative marketing associations in Area No. 1.
( b ) Area No. 2 (San Luis Valley): Seven producers and five handlers selected as follows: Three (3) producers from Rio Grande County; One (1) producer from Saguache County; One (1) producer from Conejos County; One (1) producer from Alamosa County; One (1) producer from all other counties in Area No. 2; Two (2) handlers representing all producers' cooperative marketing associations in Area No. 2; Three (3) handlers representing handlers in Area No. 2 other than producers' cooperative marketing associations.
( c ) Area No. 3: Five Producers and four handlers selected as follows:
Three (3) producers from Weld County; One (1) producer from Morgan County; One (1) producer from the remaining counties of Area No. 3; Four (4) handlers from Area No. 3.
Effective Date Note
Effective Date Note: At 57 FR 61774, Dec. 29, 1992, in § 948.50, paragraph (a) was suspended indefinitely.
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 36-7 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 1 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 36-7 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 2 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 36-7 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 3 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 36-7 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 4 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 36-7 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 5 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 36-7 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 6 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 36-7 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 7 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 36-7 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 8 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 36-7 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 9 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 36-7 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 10 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 36-7 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 11 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 36-7 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 12 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 36-7 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 13 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 36-7 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 14 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 36-7 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 15 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 36-7 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 16 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 36-7 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 17 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 36-7 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 18 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 36-7 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 19 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 36-7 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 20 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 36-7 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 21 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 36-7 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 22 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 36-7 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 23 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 36-7 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 24 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 36-7 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 25 of 25
#### § 900.80 Words in the singular form.

Words in this subpart in the singular form shall be deemed to import the plural, and vice versa, as the case may demand.
EXHIBIT 32CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002George W. Hamlin, IV, President and Chief Executive Officer and Lawrence A. Heilbronner, Chief Financial Officer, of Canandaigua National Corporation (the "Company"), each certify in his capacity as an officer of the Company that he has reviewed the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009, and that to the best of his knowledge:  (1)the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Company.The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.May 8, 2009/s/ George W. Hamlin, IV/s/ Lawrence A. HeilbronnerGeorge W. Hamlin, IVLawrence A. HeilbronnerPresident and Chief Executive OfficerExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
§ 718.205 Substantive change in farming operation, and changes in related legal entities. ( a ) Land that is properly constituted as a farm shall not be reconstituted if: ( 1 ) The reconstitution request is based upon the formation of a newly established legal entity which owns or operates the farm or any part of the farm and the county committee determines there is not a substantive change in the farming operation;
( 2 ) The county committee determines that the primary purpose of the request for reconstitution is to: ( i ) Obtain additional benefits under one or more commodity programs;
( ii ) Avoid damages or penalties under a contract or statute;
( iii ) Correct an erroneous acreage report; or
( iv ) Circumvent any other program provisions. In addition, no farm shall remain as constituted when the county committee determines that a substantive change in the farming operation has occurred which would require a reconstitution, except as otherwise approved by the State committee with the concurrence of the Deputy Administrator.
( b ) In determining whether a substantive change has occurred with respect to a farming operation, the county committee shall consider factors such as the composition of the legal entities having an interest in the farming operation with respect to management, financing, and accounting. The county committee shall also consider the use of land, labor, and equipment available to the farming operations and any other relevant factors that bear on the determination.
( c ) Unless otherwise approved by the State committee with the concurrence of the Deputy Administrator, when the county committee determines that a corporation, trust, or other legal entity is formed primarily for the purpose of obtaining additional benefits under the commodity programs of this title, the farm shall remain as constituted, or shall be reconstituted, as applicable, when the farm is owned or operated by: ( 1 ) A corporation having more than 50 percent of the stock owned by members of the same family living in the same household;
( 2 ) Corporations having more than 50 percent of the stock owned by stockholders common to more than one corporation; or
( 3 ) Trusts in which the beneficiaries and trustees are family members living in the same household.
( d ) Application of the provisions of paragraph (c) of this section shall not limit or affect the application of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section.
# Chemical Structure Diagram and Descriptive Informa tion

Trade Names: 

# Zycosil-E, Zycosoil , 

# Terrasil and Nanotac 

# CAS # 1314035-96-5 Description : Mixture of the products obtained by the transesteri fication reaction of Dimethyloctadecyl(3-triethoxysilyl)propylammonium c horide with ethylene glycol The substance is prepared by a transesterification reaction of Dimethyloctadecyl(3- triethoxysilyl)propylammonium choride (CAS # 62117-57-1) with excess of ethylene glycol (CAS # 107-21-1). The concentration of the r esulting mixture of the transesterified products are kept at 10-70 weight % in ethylene gly col.
Si N + CH 3 OEt
EtO EtO C

H 3 C 18 H 37 Cl - 

# + O

H OH Transesterified Products Dimethyloctadecyl(3-triethoxysilyl)propyl- Ethyle ne glycol ammonium choride (CAS # 62117-57-1) CAS # 107-21-1 

### The following are possible structures of the compon ent present in ethylene glycol.
Si N + CH 3 OEt
EtO EtO C

H 3 C 18 H 37 Cl 
### Dimethyloctadecyl(3-triethoxysilyl)propylammonium c horide

Si N + CH 3 O EtO OEt C

H 3 C 18 H 37 OH

Cl 
### Dimethyloctadecyl(3-diethoxy-(2-hydroxyethoxy)silyl )propylammonium chlorideSi N + CH 3 EtO C

H 3 C 18 H 37 O O H

O OH

Cl 
### Dimethyloctadecyl(3-ethoxy-di(2-hydroxyethoxy)silyl )propylammonium choride

Cl - Si N + CH 3

C H 3 C 18 H 37 O O H

O

OH O OH



### Dimethyloctadecyl(3-tri(2-hydroxyethoxy)silyl)propy lammonium choride 

## Trade Names : 

# Zycosil, Zycosoil, Terrasil, Nanotac and Zycobrial Boiling Point: 200 o 

### C (Ethylene glycol) Vapor Pressure (25 o 

### C) <5 mm of Hg Specific Gravity (25 o 

### C) 1.05 Flash Point ( o 

### C) <80 Confidential () Yes (X) No Application: Inorganic surface modifier
Order filed, September 6, 2018

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 18

- 00663

- CV

____________ ROY JORDAN, JR. , Appellant

V.

CENTERPOINT ENERGY H OUSTON ELECTRIC, LLC AND

CENTERPOINT ENERGY, INC. , Appellee

On Appeal from the 190th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2015

- 53281



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due September 4, 20198

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the
record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order My

- Thuy Cieslar , the court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 15 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 25, 2013

s0617

Order 

Clerk

June 25, 2013

146918

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146918

COA: 308191

Wayne CC: 11-006497-FH

LUTHER CLEVELAND HARRIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 21, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### FRIEDMAN, Appellant, v. COLUMBIA MACH. WORKS & MALLEABLE IRON CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

September 28, 1906.)

Action by Morris Friedman against the Columbia Machine Works & Malleable Iron Company.

No opinion. Order affirmed on argument, with ~10 costs and disbursments.
217.7004 Solicitation and award.

(a) Solicitations shall include a request for offerors to state prices—

(1) For the new items being acquired without any exchange; and

(2) For the new items with the exchange (trade-in allowance) for the exchange property listed.

(b) The contracting officer is not obligated to award on an exchange basis. If the lowest evaluated

offer is an offer for the new items without any exchange, the contracting officer may award on that

basis and forgo the exchange.

(c) Exchanges may be made only with the successful offeror. When the successful offer includes an

exchange, award one contract for both the acquisition of the new property and the trade-in of the

exchange property. The only exception is when the items must be acquired against a mandatory

Federal supply schedule contract, in which case, award a separate contract for the exchange.

Parent topic: Subpart 217.70 - EXCHANGE OF PERSONAL PROPERTY
§ 905.163 Reports of shipments under repacking certificate of privilege. ( a ) Each repacking shipper who handles citrus fruit under a repacking certificate of privilege shall supply the committee with reports on each shipment as requested by the committee, on a Report of Shipments Under Certificate of Privilege form supplied by the committee, showing the name and address of the repacking shipper; name and address of the handler supplying the inspected and certified citrus fruit for such shipment; number of packages; size and containers; brand; grade; certificate number; and any other information deemed necessary by the committee. Each repacking shipper of citrus fruit shall maintain on file a copy of the Federal-State manifest that certifies the grade and amount of each load of citrus fruit received. These manifests shall be readily available to the committee upon request.
( b ) One copy of the Report of Shipments Under Certificate of Privilege form on each shipment shall be forwarded to the committee promptly, one copy of such form shall be retained by the repacking shipper, and one copy of such form shall accompany the shipment. Failure to complete and return such form shall be cause for suspension of the repacking shippers repacking certificate of privilege.
[59 FR 48783, Sept. 23, 1994]
SERVICE BULLETIN

 N° SB 104 – CS

 Edition 2, Rev. 1 

The technical content of this document is approved under the authority of DOA. EASA.21J.335

Approval No. DO-104-280313

 28th March 2013

 

Page 1 / 2

Edition 2 Rev.1

INFORMATION  RECOMMENDED  MANDATORY 

SUBJECT: P2006T NLG upper link mandatory replacement: this SB 

supersedes the SB 104, Edition 1, revision 1.

SCOPE: Tecnam informs customers that a new Nose Landing Gear 

(NLG) upper link assy (P/N 26-8-8000-000) is available.

The new assy is equipped with an improved NLG mechanical locking device which makes easier the NLG maintenance tasks and, in particular, the locking system adjustment.

The necessary parts are provided by two different kits.

In order to put P2006T fleet in the same configuration, with 

the awareness that the design improvement is very effective 

for the above mentioned scope, Tecnam prescribes to embody the present SB.

The required hardware will be provided FREE of CHARGE 

to the customers, only if requested within 90 days from this 

SB issue date with the mandatory return of the removed old 

assy; the manpower required and shipment costs won’t be 

refunded.

After that period, Tecnam will not assure any warranty issue 

in connection with the old assy.

Customers who already bought the parts have to get in contact with Tecnam Spare Parts Manager, Mr. Luciano Russo 

(l.russo@tecnam.com): a note of credit will be issued. 

Furthermore Tecnam informs customers that old upper link 

assy p/n production ceased: for future upper link assy replacement, the new p/n will be provided. 

 

MODELS AFFECTED: All P2006T s/n have to install both kit.

P2006T s/n that have already installed kit SB104-CS has to 

install only the kit SB104-CS/2.

TIME OF COMPLIANCE: At Customer’s choice

MANPOWER: 4 man-hours for kit n° SB104-CS

2 man-hours for kit n° SB104-CS/2
 

SERVICE BULLETIN

 N° SB 104 – CS

 Edition 2, Rev. 1 

The technical content of this document is approved under the authority of DOA. EASA.21J.335

Approval No. DO-104-280313

 28th March 2013

 

Page 2 / 2

Edition 2 Rev.1

REQUIRED MATERIAL:  KIT n° SB104-CS (including job card no. 442, providing instructions for NLG upper link replacement), 

if not yet installed (SB104 previous issue), and SB 

109 (and related Kit) if not embodied yet.

 KIT n° SB104-CS/2 (including job card no. 528, providing instruction for NLG upper link upgrade).

TOOLING: Nil

WEIGHT AND BALANCE: Nil

REFERENCES: Nil

PUB. AFFECTED: “P2006T Aircraft Maintenance Manual” doc. n° 2006-45 –

last issue;

“P2006T Aircraft Parts Catalogue” doc. n° 2006-46 – last 

issue;

For further information please contact TECNAM:

Tel 0039 0823 620134

Fax 0039 0823 622899

E-mail airworthiness@tecnam.com or l.russo@tecnam.com
Case 5:02-cv-00080-SPM-AK   Document 194   Filed 01/22/08   Page 1 of 2

Case 5:02-cv-00080-SPM-AK   Document 194   Filed 01/22/08   Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7450
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus KENNETH E. VARNEY, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, District Judge. (CR-92-176, CA-95-198) Submitted: January 13, 1998 Decided: January 22, 1998 Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenneth E. Varney, Appellant Pro Se. John Castle Parr, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed therecord and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Varney , Nos. CR-92-176; CA-95-198 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 6, 1996). See Lindh v. Murphy , 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568 (U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 906.10 Pack.

*Pack* means the specific grade, quality, size, or arrangement of fruit in a particular container or containers.
# 52.249-11 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**52.249 [Reserved]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2938 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2938

            To suspend temporarily the duty on Cypermethrin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 23, 2006

  Mr. Carper introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To suspend temporarily the duty on Cypermethrin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CYPERMETHRIN.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.11.74      Cyano(3-            Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         phenoxyphenyl)met                                                  31/2009
                         hyl 3-(2,2-
                         dichloroethenyl)-
                         2,2-
                         dimethylcycloprop
                         anecarboxylate
                         (Cypermethrin)
                         (CAS No. 52315-07-
                         8) (provided for
                         in subheading
                         2926.90.30)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# 52.247-6 Financial Statement.

As prescribed in 47.207-1(e), insert the following provision in *solicitations* for transportation or for transportation-related services to ensure that *offerors* are prepared to furnish financial statements:

Financial Statement (Apr 1984)

The *offeror**shall*, upon request, promptly furnish the Government with a current certified statement of the *offeror*’s financial condition and such data as the Government *may* request with respect to the *offeror*’s operations. The Government will use this information to determine the *offeror*’s financial responsibility and ability to perform under the contract. Failure of an *offeror* to comply with a request for information will subject the *offer* to possible rejection on responsibility grounds.

(End of clause)

**Parent topic:**52.247 [Reserved]