alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2868 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2868

             To suspend temporarily the duty on Resmethrin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 19, 2006

   Mr. Burr introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To suspend temporarily the duty on Resmethrin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RESMETHRIN.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.10.83       [5-(Phenylmethyl)- Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         3-furanyl]methyl                                                   31/2009
                         2,2-dimethyl-3-(2-
                         methyl-1-
                         propenyl)
                         cyclopropanecarbo
                         xylate
                         (Resmethrin) (CAS
                         No. 10453-86-8)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2932.19.10)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

 _______________________________

JEREMIAH W. GREEN *

Plaintiff, *

 v. * 2:06-CV-667-WKW

 (WO)

ELMORE COUNTY JAIL et al., *

Defendants. *

 _______________________________

ORDER ON MOTION

Upon consideration of Defendant Robert's Motion for Extension of Time, and for

good cause, it is ORDERED that:

1. Defendant Robert's motion (Doc. No. 14) is GRANTED; and

2. Defendant Roberts is GRANTED an extension from September 25, 2006 to

October 25, 2006 to file her answer and written report.

Done this 27th day of September 2006.

/s/ Vanzetta Penn McPherson

VANZETTA PENN MCPHERSON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 15 Filed 09/27/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 4:20-cr-00042-AW-MAF   Document 35   Filed 03/26/21   Page 1 of 3

Case 4:20-cr-00042-AW-MAF   Document 35   Filed 03/26/21   Page 2 of 3

Case 4:20-cr-00042-AW-MAF   Document 35   Filed 03/26/21   Page 3 of 3
Exhibit
23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement Number
333-152121 on Form S-3 of our report dated February 18, 2009 relating to the
financial statements of United States Natural Gas Fund, LP as of December 31,
2008 and 2007 and for the periods ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 and the
effectiveness of United States Natural Gas Fund, LP’s internal control over
financial reporting dated February 18, 2009, appearing in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of United States Natural Gas Fund, LP for the year ended December 31,
2008.





/s/ SPICER JEFFRIES
      LLP





Greenwood
Village, Colorado


February
28, 2009
Case 3:06-cv-00631-MHT-VPM Document 1-3 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 1 of 20
Case 3:06-cv-00631-MHT-VPM Document 1-3 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 2 of 20
Case 3:06-cv-00631-MHT-VPM Document 1-3 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 3 of 20
Case 3:06-cv-00631-MHT-VPM Document 1-3 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 4 of 20
Case 3:06-cv-00631-MHT-VPM Document 1-3 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 5 of 20
Case 3:06-cv-00631-MHT-VPM Document 1-3 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 6 of 20
Case 3:06-cv-00631-MHT-VPM Document 1-3 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 7 of 20
Case 3:06-cv-00631-MHT-VPM Document 1-3 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 8 of 20
Case 3:06-cv-00631-MHT-VPM Document 1-3 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 9 of 20
Case 3:06-cv-00631-MHT-VPM Document 1-3 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 10 of 20
Case 3:06-cv-00631-MHT-VPM Document 1-3 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 11 of 20
Case 3:06-cv-00631-MHT-VPM Document 1-3 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 12 of 20
Case 3:06-cv-00631-MHT-VPM Document 1-3 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 13 of 20
Case 3:06-cv-00631-MHT-VPM Document 1-3 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 14 of 20
Case 3:06-cv-00631-MHT-VPM Document 1-3 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 15 of 20
Case 3:06-cv-00631-MHT-VPM Document 1-3 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 16 of 20
Case 3:06-cv-00631-MHT-VPM Document 1-3 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 17 of 20
Case 3:06-cv-00631-MHT-VPM Document 1-3 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 18 of 20
Case 3:06-cv-00631-MHT-VPM Document 1-3 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 19 of 20
Case 3:06-cv-00631-MHT-VPM Document 1-3 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 20 of 20
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

GARY LEE SEYMOUR,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 5:20-cv-214-TKW/MJF

RICKY DIXON,

Defendant.

/

SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE REPORT

On March 17, 2023, the undersigned conducted a telephonic settlement 

conference in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Doc. 64. The conference 

resulted in SETTLEMENT of this civil action.

/s/ Michael J. Frank

Michael J. Frank

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:20-cv-00214-TKW-MJF Document 100 Filed 03/17/23 Page 1 of 1
SUBPART 13.1 – PROCEDURES

Parent topic: PART 13 –– SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES

13.106-3 Award and documentation.

(S-90) Documenting the Basis for Award - Inquiry/Quote/Order (I/Q/O) Process. An I/Q/O Price

Negotiation Memorandum (PNM) for Communication Service Authorizations (CSA) shall be prepared

for all I/Q/O contracting actions (excluding administrative modifications) and included in the official

contract file. This I/Q/O PNM is applicable for use on telecommunication services and equipment

accomplished using the I/Q/O process or the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Allied Long

Lines Agency (ALLA)/National Allied Long Lines Agency (NALLA) circuit demand process under the

threshold at FAR 13.500(a). The I/Q/O PNM located at DARS PG I 13.106-3(S-90) fulfills the

documentation requirements in FAR 13.106-3 and provides the determination of fair and reasonable

pricing.
#### In the Matter of Alvin Katz, Petitioner, v. John Murtagh, as Supreme Court Justice, New York County, Respondent.

In this proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR to review the mandate of the Supreme Court, New York County, dated February 19, 1970, which summarily adjudged petitioner in contempt of court for conduct committed in the presence of the court, the mandate is unanimously confirmed, the cross-motion granted and the proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs and without disbursements. The appeal taken from the mandate is dismissed since a summary contempt adjudication is properly reviewable under article 78 of the CPLR. (Judiciary Law, § 752.) Concur — Stevens, P. J., Eager, Markewich, Nunez and Tilzer, JJ.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2010 - 1206 Directorate Identifier: 2009NM216AD DC10 - 57A156 IN 01 --- 11/17/10 REFERENCE: DC10 - 57 - 138, R01 --- 4/12/99

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
Subpart 449.1 - General Principles

Parent topic: PART 449 - TERMINATION OF CONTRACTS

449.106 Fraud or other criminal conduct.

(a) If the contracting officer suspects fraud or other criminal conduct a written report documenting

the facts shall be submitted by the head of the contracting activity (HCA) to the Office of Inspector

General. Copies of documents or other information connected with the suspected fraud or criminal

conduct shall be provided with the report. Concurrently, a copy of the report shall also be submitted

to the Senior Procurement Executive.

(b) Depending on the findings of the Office of Inspector General, the HCA may initiate suspension or

debarment action as prescribed in FAR 9.4 and 409.4.

449.111 Review of proposed settlements.

Proposed settlement agreements shall be reviewed and approved in accordance with contracting

activity procedures.
5222.9000 Department of the Navy nonconstruction contracts containing

construction work.

The DON created the DON Non-Construction Contract with Construction Work Guide containing

procedures that supplement existing policy for non-construction contracts (e.g. for supplies,

services, research and development) that contain elements of construction valued in excess of the

micro-purchase threshold. The procedures apply to all HCAs that award and administer contracts

(including task and delivery orders) for assigned program requirements. The Guide is available on

the ASN(RDA) website.

Parent topic: Subpart 5222.90 - DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NON-CONSTRUCTION

CONTRACTS CONTAINING CONSTRUCTION WORK
Part 5631 - CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES       Subpart 5631.2 - CONTRACTS WITH COMMERCIAL ORGANIZATIONS                                                         5631.205 Selected Costs.                                                                           5631.205-32 PreContract Costs.                                                                                                           5631.205-46 Travel Costs (Removed August 2017).    Subpart 5631.2 - CONTRACTS WITH COMMERCIAL ORGANIZATIONS     5631.205 Selected Costs.     5631.205-32 PreContract Costs.    *(Revised August 2017)*       (a) Pre-Contract cost authorization shall be reviewed by legal counsel and approved by the cognizant HCD or FCO before issuance. As a condition precedent to the use of a pre-contract cost agreement, the correct type of funds must be available upon issuance of the pre-contract cost agreement. Authorization must be in writing and shall address the following:       (i) The necessity for the contractor to initiate work prior to contract award       (ii) The start date of such contractor effort       (iii) The total estimated time of the advanced effort       (iv) The cost limitation       (b) Indicate on the Standard Form 26, Award/Contract, Block 15, and in Section G of any resultant contract the date pre-contract costs were approved. This notifies the payment office that the pre-contract costs are allowable and that the contractor may be reimbursed. The effective date of the contract shall be the date parties reach a bilateral agreement.       (c) Pre-contract cost authorization shall not be used to cover a period in excess of 30 days or $100,000, unless a longer period/larger dollar threshold is approved by the HCA via a written determination and findings that such an allowance is reasonable, and shall not be extended or renewed.       (d) *(Removed August 2017)*.5631.205-46 Travel Costs (Removed August 2017).    HQ, United States Special Operations Command       Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L)       SOFARS 5631       February 2007
52.247-45 F.o.b. Origin and/or F.o.b. Destination Evaluation.       As prescribed in 47.305-2(b), insert the following provision in solicitations when offers are solicited on the basis of both f.o.b. origin and f.o.b. destination:          F.o.b. Origin and/or F.o.b. Destination Evaluation (Apr 1984)          Offers are invited on the basis of both f.o.b. origin and f.o.b. destination, and the Government will award on the basis the Contracting Officer determines to be most advantageous to the Government. An offer on the basis of f.o.b. origin only or f.o.b. destination only is acceptable, but will be evaluated only on the basis submitted.          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.247 [Reserved]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3124 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3124

    To suspend temporarily the duty on ski boots, cross country ski 
                     footwear and snowboard boots.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

   Mr. Leahy introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on ski boots, cross country ski 
                     footwear and snowboard boots.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF CERTAIN EXISTING DUTY SUSPENSIONS AND 
              REDUCTIONS.

    (a) Other Modifications.--
            (1) Snowboard boots.--Heading 9902.64.04 of the Harmonized 
        Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended--
                    (A) by striking ``Snowboard'' and inserting ``Ski 
                boots, cross country ski footwear and snowboard'';
                    (B) by striking ``4%'' and inserting ``Free''; and
                    (C) by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/
                31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
17.9101 Policy.    (a) The cognizant requirements office develops and initiates the Product Loan Agreement (PLA) using the instructions and automated application available at: https://cmis.disa.mil/facilities/vendorloan/vendorloan.cfm.       (b) The contracting officer is the only individual authorized to enter into, administer, and terminate Product Loan Agreements on behalf of the Government. Unauthorized signatures on Product Loan Agreements may result in Anti-Deficiency Act violations. **Parent topic:** SUBPART 17.91 — PRODUCT LOAN AGREEMENTS
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2897 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on 3,6,9-Trioxaundecanedioic 

acid. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 19, 2006 

Mr. BURR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on 3,6,9- 

Trioxaundecanedioic acid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 3,6,9-TRIOXAUNDECANEDIOIC ACID. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.04.09 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Crotonic acid) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and 

7 inserting ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•S 2897 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
Order entered November 20, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00877-CR

No. 05-14-00878-CR

No. 05-14-00879-CR

No. 05-14-00880-CR

REGINALD KEITH PINK, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

ORDER

By letter dated November 5, 2014, the Court notified appellant that if he wished to file a 

pro se response to the Anders brief filed by counsel, the response was due by January 5, 2015. 

The Court now has before it appellant’s November 19, 2014 request for an extension of time 

until February 4, 2015. Appellant states that he has had the record since September 10, 2014, but 

that his limited research time and legal knowledge require the additional thirty days. 

Because appellant’s response is not due for nearly six weeks, we DENY the November 

19, 2014 extension request without prejudice to appellant filing a second request on January 5, 

2015 explaining why he could not meet the specified deadline.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by first-class mail, to Reginald Pink, 

TDCJ No. 1938997, McConnell Unit, 3001 South Emily Drive, Beeville, Texas 78102.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to 

counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
### •:-^.|^TMENTO F • ••^'OHTATIO N 

# TRANSPdRT^CTlO N

MO-irll l lO " fvh^fON f 

# C>oT - osr - 200Z . -11^2 .

Respon d to ; NE W MEXIC O AVI ATIO N DIVISIO N

P C Bo x983 0 Albuquerque , N M 8711 9 505-244-178 8 phon e 505-244-179 0 fa x Marc h4 , 201 1 Denni s J . DeVany , Chie f Essentia l Ai r

Servic e Division , X-5 3 Roo m640 1 Offic e o f

Aviatio nAnalysi s Dept . o f Transportatio n 40 0 7t h St . S W Washington , D C 2059 0 Dea r Mr . DeVany , Than k yo u fo r givin g u s th e opportunit y t o comtnen t o nth e EA S proposal s to r Carlsbad , Clovi s an d Silve r City . Ne w Mexic o Airline s submitte dastan dalon e proposa l fo r Carlsba dan dSilve r

City . Ne w Mexic o Airline s i s th e incumben t carrie r a t Carlsbad . I

t i s ou r understandin g tha t

th e propose daircraf

t doe s no t meet th e two-engin e o r

15-or-mor e passenge r

seat requirement . Ou r

concer nwit

hth e Ne w Mexic o Airline s proposa l i s that th e airplan e i s no t

pressurized . Seapor t submitte daproposa l for Clovis , Carlsba dan dSilve r City . Th e aircraf

t tha t SeaPort wil l b e utilizin g als o doe s no t

mee t th e two-engin e o r

15-or-mor e passenge r

requirement ; howeve r

th e aircraf t i s pressurize dan daccordin g t o th e proposa l wil l b e operate dwit htwo-pilot s a

t al l times . If th e communitie s woul ddecid e t o sig nawaive r for thi s aircraft , w e woul dsupport tha t decision . Great Lake s Airline s submitte dproposal s for Clovi s an dSilve r

City . Grea t

Lake s Airline s i s th e incumben t

carrie r t o bothcommunities . Th e propose daircraf t currentl y meet s al l EA S requirements . Ultimatel y w e feel that

th e Beechcraf

t 1900 D currenlJ y use db y Grea t Lake s present s th e saiiGs i an d mos t comfortabl e optio n for

th e travelin g public . Th e extrem e differenc e o f terrai nan dweathe r

i n Ne w Mexic o constitute s anee dfor amulti-engin e aircraf

t withweathe r

avoidanc e capabilities . It i s th e opinio no f

th e Ne w Mexic o Aviatio nDivisio nthat th e aircraf

t mee t al l curren t

EAS requirements . W e greatl y appreciat e yo u givin g u s a nopportunit y t o commen t o nthes e proposals . EA S i s o f grea t importanc e t o ou r

Stat e an dcommunities . A s always , w e appreciat e you r wor k o nbehal f

o f th e Stat e o f Ne w Mexico . Sincerely , Susan a Martine z Governo r Alvi n C . Dominguez , P.E . Cabine t Secretary Jan e M . Lucero , A/C P Actin g Divisio n Directo r



# sis^iu-/ y ,^:>we/ ^ Jan e M . Lucer o Actin g Directo r Ne w Mexic o Aviatio nDivisio n

Genera l Offic e P . O . B o X 11 4 9 Sant a Fe . N M 87504- 1 14 9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

) CRIMINAL ACTION NO.

 v. )

) 2:06cr169-WKW 

WILMONT TIMOTHY BARNETT )

O R D E R

The defendant by consent has appeared before a United States Magistrate Judge and has

entered a plea of guilty. The Magistrate Judge accepted the plea of guilty and has adjudicated the

defendant guilty. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. Sentencing of the defendant is hereby set on January 25, 2008, at 2:00 p.m., Courtroom

2-E, of the Frank M. Johnson, Jr. United States Courthouse Complex, One Church Street,

Montgomery, Alabama.

2. In accordance with Rule 32(f)(1), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, counsel for the

defendant and the Government shall communicate in writing to the probation officer, and to each

other, any objections they have as to any material information, sentencing classifications, sentencing

guideline ranges, and policy statements contained in or omitted from the presentence report. The

probation officer will notify parties of the objection deadline and will schedule a conference to

discuss and resolve, if possible, any factual and legal issues contained in the presentence report.

3. Any motion for downward departure shall be filed on or before the conference date with

the probation officer, unless based on unknown and unforeseen circumstances arising after that date,

in which case the motion must be filed promptly upon discovery of such circumstances.

Nothing contained in this Order shall be construed as impairing the rights of any party as

established in the Constitution or laws of the United States.

DONE this 30th day of October, 2007.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 451 Filed 10/30/2007 Page 1 of 1
PLAINTIFF.

IYL!

GWENDOLYN GIVENS, Ct

DEFENDANT(S).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE D[SI1JCT OF ALABAMA

NORilEN DIVISION

GEORGE PARKER,# 140922 JUL tS)A 0 -.9

E r3iA P. I1AC

aiTT10N NO: 2: 06-CV-649-WHA

REQUEST FOR STATUS

Comes Now, the P1aintift George Parke, (Hereinafter 'Parker") in the abovestyled cause and moves this Honorable Court for the status of his Civil Rights Complaint.

In support thereof the following is shown unto the Court:

1. On or about July 20, 2006, Parker filed his civil rights complaint and thereafter was

granted in forma pauperis status.

2. Parker then requested the status of the aforesaid civil rights complaint that was then

granted by this court on the 28Ih, day of March 2007.

3.Parker now request this Honorable Court to Grant him the status of his civil rights

complaint at this time.

Wherefore Premises Considered. Parker prays that this Honorable Court will grant

this motion for status.

Respectfully Submitted,

Geo'ge Parker, pro-se

Case 2:06-cv-00649-WHA-WC Document 28 Filed 07/18/2008 Page 1 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

1, George Parker, do hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing

motion for status has been served on the Respondents Counsel, by placing same in the

prison mailbox at Staton Correctional Facility for US Mailing postage prepaid and

properly addressed on :) L-t- j

Clerk of Court

United States District Court

Middle District of Alabama

P. 0. Box #711

Montgomery, AL 36101-071 1

Honorable Tara S. Knee

Alabama Department of Corrections

p • a Box #301501

Montgomery, AL 36130

Submitted By

.%or7 ''

eorge Parker, pro-se

#140922/F 1-5A

P. 0. Box # 56

Elmore, Al 36025-0056

Case 2:06-cv-00649-WHA-WC Document 28 Filed 07/18/2008 Page 2 of 3
Cc'rge Parker, #140922/F l-5A

0. Box # 56

Elmore, Al 36025-0056

L(- ,' /

State of Alabama

Central Mail Os

#4

Clerk of Co'!rt

United States District Court

Middle District of Alabama

P. 0. BOX #711

Montgomery. AL 36101-0711

,s 

O.s7:4q

4 , ,

Y POWfS

02 $ 00.42°

000236875 iUL 1 7 2O0

MALEO FROM ZPCODE 36104

LEGAL MAft

4 - -. _7 i U U HU UU I ii H U in i I Ill WWIIWI II II IlIuiJ31I

Case 2:06-cv-00649-WHA-WC Document 28 Filed 07/18/2008 Page 3 of 3