alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

ANGELA SIMMONS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

LIBERTY NATIONAL LIFE 

INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. 2:06-cv-689-DRB 

DEFENDANT LIBERTY NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE

COMPANY’S DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

In accordance with this Court’s January 28, 2000 Order and Federal Rule of 

Civil Procedure 7.1, defendant Liberty National Life Insurance Company 

(“defendant”) submits the following Disclosure Statement. Torchmark 

Corporation, a publicly traded company, is defendant’s parent corporation. 

Defendant has no publicly traded subsidiaries that are not wholly owned. 

Defendant has no publicly traded affiliates. 

Case 2:06-cv-00689-MEF-DRB Document 4 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 1 of 2
2 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/Thomas A. Davis

Thomas A. Davis (ASB-5877-S56T) 

E-mail: tdavis@constangy.com

Direct Dial No.: (205) 226-5465 

Shannon L. Miller (ASB-8026-R60S) 

E-mail: smiller@constangy.com

Direct Dial No.: (205) 226-5468 

CONSTANGY, BROOKS & SMITH, LLC 

Suite 900, One Federal Place 

1819 Fifth Avenue North 

Birmingham, AL 35203 

Facsimile: (205) 323-7674 

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 25, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing 

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system that will send notification of 

such filing to the following: 

Kathryn Dickey, Esq. 

322 Alabama Street 

Montgomery, AL 36104 

Janice Spears-Turk, Esq. 

5295 Vaughn Road 

Montgomery, AL 36116 

/s/Thomas A. Davis

Thomas A. Davis 

Case 2:06-cv-00689-MEF-DRB Document 4 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 2 of 2
# Flsl lÐtú
Janury 

### 16,2012

Dr. Maria Doa Director, Chemical 

### Control Division U.S. EPA 1200 Pennsylvania 

### Ave., NW (MC 7405M) Washington, 

### D.C.20460
Dear Dr. Doa: 

### The Carpet 

### and Rug lnstitute is aware ofthe 

### environmental and sustainability 

### trends occuning inthe

### world. ln keeping with 

### their longstanding commitment 

### to environmental responsib¡lity, carpet industry 

### members of

### The Carpet and 

### Rug lnstitute have discontinued 

### the use 

### of products known as PFOA (CB or higher chemistries). 

### The United States carpet industry 

### members ofThe Carpet and 

### Rug lnstitute voluntarily switched 

### to less persistent and controversial compounds beginning prior 

### to 2003 and completing sometime near 

### the end of 2005 or beginning of 2006. This voluntary move 

### was not in response 

### to specific or credible scientific research available at that time 

### showing a risk associated with C8 

### chemistries. Rather, it

### was a precautionary move made

### to ensure 

### the absolute andtotal safety of

### the products 

### we make. To be clear, 

### there is no use of

### the chemistry 

### known as PFOA among 

### the manufacturing membership of

### The Carpet 

### and Rug lnstitute. 

### The Carpet and Rug lnstitute 

### does not

### track data 

### from non-United States manufacturers 

### orthe few domestic manufacturers 

### whoare not members of

### The Carpet 

### and Rug lnstitute. 

### The manufacturer members of

### ïhe Carpet 

### and Rug lnstitute are proud of

### their long and consistent 

### historyof producing asafe,

### functional, and beautiful product 

### for millions of

### families and

### workpleces around the 

### world.You can recognize 

### The Carpet and Rug 

### lnstitute mark as a sign of

### trust and our diligent efforts to produce 

### thesafest and finest quality carpet and rug products in

### the world. Sincerely,



### Wemer H. Braun Presidertt



### cc: Mr. 

### Toni Krasnic EPA 1200 Pennsylvania 

### Ave NW MC-7405M 

### Washington, 

### D.C.20460 

# å-";E cärpet-rug.orS 

## lYr,(tl P.O. Box 2048 Dalton Georsia 30722-2048...706.278.3176 

# åüt
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 13-4 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3212 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3212

   To suspend temporarily the duty on Ethene, tetrafluoro-oxidized, 
              polymerized reduced, methyl esters, reduced.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

Mr. Lautenberg introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on Ethene, tetrafluoro-oxidized, 
              polymerized reduced, methyl esters, reduced.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ETHENE, TETRAFLUORO-OXIDIZED, POLYMERIZED REDUCED, METHYL 
              ESTERS, REDUCED.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.39.17        Ethene, tetrafluoro-    Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           oxidized, polymerized                                             31/2009          ''
                           reduced, methyl                                                                     .
                           esters, reduced (CAS
                           No. 88645-29-8)
                           (provided for in
                           subheading 3907.20)..

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 34 Filed 12/14/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 34 Filed 12/14/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 34 Filed 12/14/2006 Page 3 of 3
+

DUPLICATE

Court Name: U S DISTRICT COURT - AL/k

Division: 2

Recei pt Number: 4602004675

Cashier ID: brobinso

Transaction Date: 04/10/2008

Payer Name: ANTHONY MOORER

NOTICE OF APPEAL/DOCKETING FEE

For: ANTHONY MOORER

Case/Party: D-ALM-2-06-CV-000672-001

Amount: $455.00

CASH

Amt Tendered: $455.00

Total Due: $455.00

Total Tendered: $455.00

Change Amt: $0.00

Case 2:06-cv-00672-WKW-WC Document 41 Filed 04/10/2008 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 2

DECLARATION OF JAMES KAUFFMAN

Kimberly Grippa v. Ronald Rubin

Case No. 4:20cv457-MW/MAF

Case 4:20-cv-00457-MW-MAF Document 109-2 Filed 02/14/22 Page 1 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

KIMBERLY GRIPPA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. Case No.: 4:20cv457-MW/MAF 

RONALD RUBIN, 

Defendant. 

______________________________/

DECLARATION OF JAMES KAUFFMAN

1. I am a Partner at the law firm of Bailey & Glasser LLP and represent the 

Defendant in this action. The statements below are based on my personal knowledge. 

2. I am a member in good standing of the Florida Bar and the Northern 

District of Florida. 

3. Attached as Exhibit 3 to the Defendant’s Notice of Filing Exhibits in 

Support of Motion for Summary Judgment is a true and correct copy of the June 21, 

2019, letter sent by Michael Tein to Governor DeSantis. 

4. Attached as Exhibit 4 to the Defendant’s Notice of Filing Exhibits in 

Support of Motion for Summary Judgment is a true and correct copy of the June 21, 

2019, letter sent by Michael Tein to Inspector General Melinda Miguel. 

5. Attached as Exhibit 5 to the Defendant’s Notice of Filing Exhibits in 

Support of Motion for Summary Judgment is a true and correct copy of an e-mail 

from Peter Penrod approving Kimberly Grippa’s salary increase for her position with 

DFS. This document was produced in this matter by DFS. 

6. Attached as Exhibit 6 to the Defendant’s Notice of Filing Exhibits in 

Support of Motion for Summary Judgment is a true and correct copy of the May 10, 

Case 4:20-cv-00457-MW-MAF Document 109-2 Filed 02/14/22 Page 2 of 3
2

2019, offer letter Kimberly Grippa received from Peter Penrod for a position with 

DFS. This document was produced in this matter by Kimberly Grippa. 

7. Attached as Exhibit 7 to the Defendant’s Notice of Filing Exhibits in 

Support of Motion for Summary Judgment is a true and correct copy of the June 27, 

2019 email from Kimberly Grippa to Ryan West rejecting the DFS job offer.

8. Attached as Exhibit 8 to the Defendant’s Notice of Filing Exhibits in 

Support of Motion for Summary Judgment is a true and correct copy of excerpts 

from Kimberly Grippa’s deposition testimony taken on December 22, 2021.

9. Attached as Exhibit 9 to the Defendant’s Notice of Filing Exhibits in 

Support of Motion for Summary Judgment is a true and correct copy of excerpts 

from Peter Penrod’s deposition testimony taken on June 1, 2021.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, I declare under penalty of perjury that the 

foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Dated: February 14, 2022. 

 

 ________________________________

 JAMES KAUFFMAN

Case 4:20-cv-00457-MW-MAF Document 109-2 Filed 02/14/22 Page 3 of 3
Order entered June 27, 2013

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 00278

- CV

CITY OF DALLAS, Appellant

V.

MILLWEE

- JACKSON JOINT VENTUR E, ET AL., Appellee s

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 04

- 07287

- E



### O RDER

We GRANT appellees’ June 25, 2013 unopposed motion for an extension of time to file

a brief. Appellees shall file their brief on or before July 5, 2013.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of China Fortune Acquisition Corp. (the
“Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of
      the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:
                June 27, 2008
            /s/
                Yufeng ZhangName:
            Yufeng
                ZhangTitle:
            Chief
                Financial Officer(Principal
                Financial and Accounting Officer)
Case 1:06-cv-00699-WHA-CSC Document 7 Filed 12/20/2006 Page 1 of 1
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

§ 800.80 Methods and order of performing official inspection services. ( a ) *Methods* — ( 1 ) *General.* All official inspection services shall be performed in accordance with methods and procedures prescribed in the regulations and the instructions.
( 2 ) *Lot inspection services.* A lot inspection service shall be based on a representative sampling and examination of the grain in the entire lot, except as provided in § 800.85, and an accurate analysis of the grain in the sample.
( 3 ) *Stowage examination service.* A stowage examination service shall be based on a thorough and accurate examination of the carrier or container into which grain will be loaded.
( 4 ) *Submitted sample inspection service.* A submitted sample inspection service shall be based on a submitted sample of sufficient size to enable official personnel to perform a complete analysis for grade. If a complete analysis for grade cannot be performed because of an inadequate sample size or other conditions, the request for service shall be dismissed or a factor only inspection may be performed upon request.
( 5 ) *Reinspection and appeal inspection service.* A reinspection, appeal inspection, or Board appeal inspection service shall be based on an independent review of official grade information, official factor information, or other information consistent with the scope of the original inspection.
( b ) *Order of service.* Official inspection services shall be performed, to the extent practicable, in the order in which they are received. Priority shall be given to inspections required for export grain. Priority may be given to other kinds of inspection services under the Act with the specific approval of the Service.
( c ) *Recording receipt of documents.* Each document submitted by or on behalf of an applicant for inspection services shall be promptly stamped or similarly marked by official personnel to show the date of receipt.
( d ) *Conflicts of interest.* No official personnel shall perform or participate in performing an official inspection service on grain or on a carrier or container in which they have a direct or indirect financial interest.
[50 FR 49669, Dec. 4, 1985]
§ 780.12 Appeals of penalties assessed under the Agricultural Foreign Investment Disclosure Act of 1978. ( a ) Requests for appeals of penalties assessed under the Agricultural Foreign Investment Disclosure Act of 1978 must be addressed to: Administrator, Farm Service Agency, Stop 0572, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-0572.
( b ) Decisions in appeals under this section are not subject to reconsideration and are administratively final.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

WILLIE MCNAIR, )

)

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2:06-cv-695-WKW

)

RICHARD ALLEN, et al., )

)

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. )

____________________________________

)

JAMES CALLAHAN, )

)

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2:06-cv-919-WKW

)

RICHARD ALLEN, et al., )

)

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. )

ORDER

Upon consideration of the defendants’ Motion to Submit Additional Grounds and Authority

(Doc. # 52), it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED.

Upon consideration of the defendants’ Motion for Summary Dismissal Based on the Doctrine

of Laches (Doc. # 53), it is ORDERED that the plaintiff shall file a response on or before

May 1, 2007.

Done this 24thday of April, 2007.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 54 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 1 of 1
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2967 

To suspend temporarily the duty on AC electric motors of an output exceeding 

74.6 W but not exceeding 105 W. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 23, 2006 

Mr. FRIST (for himself and Mr. ALEXANDER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on AC electric motors of 

an output exceeding 74.6 W but not exceeding 105 W. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AC ELECTRIC MOTORS OF AN OUTPUT EXCEED4 ING 74.6 W BUT NOT EXCEEDING 105 W. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 2967 IS 

‘‘ 9902.85.07 AC electric motors of an output exceeding 74.6 W but not exceeding 105 W, 

single phase; each equipped with a capacitor, a rotary speed control mechanism, 

and a motor mounting cooling ring (provided for in subheading 8501.40.40) ....... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
§ 760.806 Crop eligibility requirements. ( a ) A participant on a farm is eligible for assistance under this section with respect to losses to an insurable commodity or NAP if the participant: ( 1 ) In the case of an insurable commodity, obtained a policy or plan of insurance under the Federal Crop Insurance Act for the crop incurring the losses; or
( 2 ) In the case of a NAP covered crop, filed the required paperwork and paid the administrative fee by the applicable filing deadline, for the noninsurable commodity under section 196 of the Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 for the crop incurring the losses.
( b ) The reasons a participant either elected not to have coverage or did not have coverage mentioned in paragraphs (a)(1) or (2) of this section are not relevant to the determination of the participant's ineligibility under this section. In addition, such reasons for not having crop insurance coverage have no bearing for consideration under part 718, subpart D of this chapter.
§ 966.74 Records. ( a ) The committee shall maintain a record of all applications submitted for exemption certificates, a record of all exemption certificates issued and denied, the quantity of tomatoes covered by such exemption certificates, a record of the amount of tomatoes handled under exemption certificates, a record of appeals for reconsideration of applications, and such information as may be requested by the Secretary. Periodic reports on such records shall be compiled and issued by the committee upon request of the Secretary.
( b ) The Secretary shall have the right, to modify, change, alter, or rescind any procedure and any exemptions granted pursuant to §§ 966.70, 966.71, 966.72, 966.73, or any combination thereof.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3271 

To extend the suspension of duty on 5-amino-N-(2-hydroxyethyl)–2,3- 

xylenesulfonamide. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 26, 2006 

Mr. FRIST (for Mrs. DOLE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on 5-amino-N-(2- 

hydroxyethyl)–2,3-xylenesulfonamide. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.30.31 of the Har4 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended 

5 by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

7 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

8 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

9 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
PART 713—SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

PROCEDURES

Authority: Sec. 621, Pub. L. 87–195, 75 Stat. 445, (22 U.S.C. 2381) as amended; E.O. 12163, Sept.

29, 1979, 44 FR 56673; 3 CFR 1979 Comp., p. 435.

Source: 61 FR 39091, July 26, 1996, unless otherwise noted.

713.000 Scope of part.

713.001 Definitions.

Subpart 713.1—Procedures.

713.106-370 Partner vetting.

Parent topic: SUBCHAPTER C—CONTRACTING METHODS AND CONTRACT TYPES

713.000 Scope of part.

The simplified acquisition threshold applies to the cost of supplies and services, exclusive of the cost

of transportation and other accessorial costs if their destination is outside the United States.

713.001 Definitions.

Accessorial costs means the cost of getting supplies or services to their destination in the

cooperating country (and the travel costs of returning personnel to the U.S. or other point of hire). It

does not include costs such as allowances or differentials related to maintaining personnel at post

which are to be considered as part of the base costs within the simplified acquisition threshold.

Subpart 713.1—Procedures.

713.106-370 Partner vetting.

If an acquisition is identified as subject to vetting, see (48 CFR) AIDAR 704.70 for the applicable

procedures and requirements.
239.7602-1 General.

(a) Generally, DoD shall acquire cloud computing services using commercial terms and conditions

that are consistent with Federal law, and an agency’s needs, including those requirements specified

in this subpart. Some examples of commercial terms and conditions are license agreements, End

User License Agreements (EULAs), Terms of Service (TOS), or other similar legal instruments or

agreements. Contracting officers shall incorporate any applicable service provider terms and

conditions into the contract by attachment or other appropriate mechanism. Contracting officers

shall carefully review commercial terms and conditions and consult counsel to ensure these are

consistent with Federal law, regulation, and the agency’s needs.

(b)(1) Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, the contracting officer shall only award

a contract to acquire cloud computing services from a cloud service provider (e.g., contractor or

subcontractor, regardless of tier) that has been granted provisional authorization by Defense

Information Systems Agency, at the level appropriate to the requirement, to provide the relevant

cloud computing services in accordance with the Cloud Computing Security Requirements Guide

(SRG) (version in effect at the time the solicitation is issued or as authorized by the contracting

officer) found at https://public.cyber.mil/dccs/ .

(2) The contracting officer may award a contract to acquire cloud computing services from a cloud

service provider that has not been granted provisional authorization when—

(i) The requirement for a provisional authorization is waived by the DoD Chief Information Officer;

or

(ii) The cloud computing service requirement is for a private, on-premises version that will be

provided from U.S. Government facilities. Under this circumstance, the cloud service provider must

obtain a provisional authorization prior to operational use.

(c) When contracting for cloud computing services, the contracting officer shall ensure the following

information is provided by the requiring activity:

(1) Government data and Government-related data descriptions.

(2) Data ownership, licensing, delivery and disposition instructions specific to the relevant types of

Government data and Government-related data (e.g., DD Form 1423, Contract Data Requirements

List; work statement task; line item). Disposition instructions shall provide for the transition of data

in commercially available, or open and non-proprietary format (and for permanent records, in

accordance with disposition guidance issued by National Archives and Record Administration).

(3) Appropriate requirements to support applicable inspection, audit, investigation, or other similar

authorized activities specific to the relevant types of Government data and Government-related data,

or specific to the type of cloud computing services being acquired.

(4) Appropriate requirements to support and cooperate with applicable system-wide search and

access capabilities for inspections, audits, investigations.

Parent topic: 239.7602 Policy and responsibilities.