alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                            2600
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1208
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      22775
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                             404
<DEPRECIATION>                                     296
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   32856
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                          18703
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            29
<OTHER-SE>                                        7204
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     32856
<SALES>                                          18944
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 19107
<CGS>                                            16394
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    18617
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    490
<INCOME-TAX>                                       186
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                304
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       304
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11
<FN>
<F1>the Company does not present a classified balance sheet
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

LONNIE CAMMON, #236498, )

)

 Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06-CV-674-WKW

)

DOCTOR SEDIET, et al., )

)

 Defendants )

ORDER 

Upon consideration of the motion for leave to file a motion to dismiss filed by the

defendants on August 11, 2006 (Court Doc. No. 7), and for good cause, it is

ORDERED that this motion be and is hereby DENIED. 

Done this 14th day of August, 2006.

/s/ Delores R. Boyd

DELORES R. BOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00674-WKW-TFM Document 8 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
10.1


 


 


 


March
8, 2018


 


Delivered
via Company Email


 


Mr.
Patrick Lyons


 


Dear
Patrick:


 


We
are pleased to extend to you the offer of the following amendment (the “Amendment”) to your employment agreement,
dated as of August 7, 2015, between Hudson Global, Inc. and you (the “Agreement”). The terms of the Amendment are
as follows:


 


		1.	The
reference to “pro rata target bonus” in the first sentence of Section 5(c)(i) of the Agreement is deleted in its entirety
and replaced with “target bonus.”



 


		2.	Except
as expressly set forth in this Amendment, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and this Amendment shall not otherwise
modify or amend any of the terms or conditions contained in the Agreement.



 


Please
acknowledge your acceptance of the terms outlined above in this Amendment by signing and dating this Amendment and returning it
to me. You are welcome to call me with questions at 212-351-7400.


 


Sincerely,


 


/s/
Stephen A. Nolan


 


Stephen
A. Nolan 


Chief
Executive Officer


	 	 	 
	Acknowledged and Agreed:
	 	 	 
	/s/ Patrick Lyons	 	March 9, 2018
	 	 	 
	Patrick Lyons	 	Date




 


www.hudson.com
716.506 Solicitation provision and contract

clause.

(a) As prescribed in 48 CFR 704.7005(a), the contracting officer will insert the provision at

752.204–70 Partner Vetting Pre–Award Requirements, in solicitations for indefinite delivery

contracts when USAID anticipates that any orders placed under the contract will be subject to

vetting.

(b)

(1) The contracting officer will insert the clause at 752.216–71 Partner Vetting, in those solicitations

and contracts for indefinite-delivery contracts that USAID identifies as subject to vetting.

(2) The contracting officer will use the clause with its Alternate I when USAID determines that

subcontracts at any tier for certain classes of supplies or services are subject to vetting.

Parent topic: Subpart 716.5—Indefinite-Delivery Contracts
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 318 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 318

   To clarify conditions for the interceptions of computer trespass 
               communications under the USA-PATRIOT Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 8, 2005

 Mr. Feingold introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To clarify conditions for the interceptions of computer trespass 
               communications under the USA-PATRIOT Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Computer Trespass Clarification Act 
of 2005''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 18.

    (a) Definitions.--Section 2510(21)(B) of title 18, United States 
Code, is amended by--
            (1) inserting ``or other'' after ``contractual''; and
            (2) striking ``for access'' and inserting ``permitting 
        access''.
    (b) Interception and Disclosure.--Section 2511(2)(i) of title 18, 
United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in clause (I), by inserting after ``the owner or 
        operator of the protected computer'' the following: ``is 
        attempting to respond to communications activity that threatens 
        the integrity or operation of such computer and requests 
        assistance to protect rights and property of the owner or 
        operator, and''; and
            (2) in clause (IV), by inserting after ``interception'' the 
        following: ``ceases as soon as the communications sought are 
        obtained or after 96 hours, whichever is earlier, unless an 
        interception order is obtained under this chapter, and''.
    (c) Report.--The Attorney General shall, within 60 days of 
enactment and annually thereafter, report to the Committees on the 
Judiciary of the Senate and the House of Representatives on the use 
during the previous year of section 2511 of title 18, United States 
Code, relating to computer trespass provisions as amended by subsection 
(b).
                                 <all>
```
EX-34 (c)
(logo) Crowe
Crowe Chizek and Company LLC
Member Horwath International




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



Audit Committee
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
West Palm Beach, Florida


We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying report,
that Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC (the Company) complied with the servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission's Regulation AB for the Residential Mortgage Loans Platform (the
"Platform") as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, excluding criteria
1122(1)(iii) and 1122(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable
to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform. The
Platform consists of the asset-backed transactions and securities defined by
management in Appendix B of Management's Report. Management is responsible for
the Company's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards established by
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria for the Platform and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination
included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities constituting
the Platform and evaluating whether the Company performed servicing activities
related to those transactions and securities in compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria for the period covered by this report. Accordingly, our
testing may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed
transaction or security constituting the Platform. Further, our examination was
not designed to detect material noncompliance that may have occurred prior to
the period covered by this report and that may have affected the Company's
servicing activities during the period covered by this report. We believe that
our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination
does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion referred to above is fairly stated, in
all material respects, based on the aforementioned applicable servicing
criteria.


/s/ Crowe Chizek and Company LLC
Crowe Chizek and Company LLC


Fort Lauderdale, Florida
March 8, 2007
#### § 900.52b Amended pleadings.

At any time before the close of the hearing the petition or answer may be amended, but the hearing shall, at the request of the adverse party, be adjourned or recessed for such reasonable time as the judge may determine to be necessary to protect the interests of the parties. Amendments subsequent to the first amendment or subsequent to the filing of an answer may be made only with leave of the judge or with the written consent of the adverse party.
§ 915.11 District. *District* means the applicable one of the following described subdivisions of the production area: ( a ) *District 1* shall include Miami-Dade County.
( b ) *District 2* shall include all of the production area except Miami-Dade County.
[19 FR 3439, June 11, 1954. Redesignated at 26 FR 12751, Dec. 30, 1961, as amended at 73 FR 6837, Feb. 6, 2008]
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Christ Vogts, Respondent, v. Bay Shore Sunrise Bowl et al., Respondents, and Special Disability Fund, Appellant. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Herlihy, J.

Appeal by the Special Disability Fund from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, dated August 24, 1967, which denied its application for a review of the compensation rate of claimant. In its application to the board for review of this reduced earnings rate, the appellant did not purport to be requesting review of any .particular Referee’s decision and indeed, the last decision referring to a rate had been rendered by a Referee on April 18, 1966 and was affirmed by the board on October 21, 1966. It is, therefore, apparent that as to these awards made prior to October 21, 1966 and to subsequent payments made pursuant to that order, the appellant had no right to a review of the rate by way of an appeal. (See Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 23.) The board found: *“*As to raising extent of disability, the reduced earnings rate has long since been established and claimant classified and no objection was made by either the carrier or the Special Funds Conservation Committee. It is not contemplated that compensation cases should be tried piece-meal or prolonged unreasonably.” The finding by the board is technically correct as to an application to review prior board decisions and our ■ affirmance is mandated. However, we note that if a rate established is factually and/or legally erroneous, the board has continuing jurisdiction and on its own motion or on a proper application by an interested party, an erroneous rate may be corrected. (See Workmen’s Compensation Law, §§ 123, 22, 15, subd. 6, par. [a].) We do not consider or pass upon the merits as to the correctness of the reduced earnings rate. Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Staley, Jr., and Cooke, JJ., concur in memorandum by Herlihy, J. .
§ 915.52 Modification, suspension, or termination of regulations. ( a ) In the event the committee at any time finds that, by reason of changed conditions, any regulations issued pursuant to § 915.51 should be modified, suspended, or terminated, it shall so recommend to the Secretary.
( b ) Whenever the Secretary finds, from the recommendations and information submitted by the committee or from other available information, that a regulation should be modified, suspended, or terminated with respect to any or all shipments of avocados in order to effectuate the declared policy of the act, he shall modify, suspend, or terminate such regulation. If the Secretary finds that a regulation obstructs or does not tend to effectuate the declared policy of the act, he shall suspend or terminate such regulation. On the same basis and in like manner the Secretary may terminate any such modification or suspension.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

April 3, 2007

NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY

 REGARDING CORPORATE/

CONFLICT STATEMENT

To: Mission Petroleum Carriers

From: Clerk’s Office

Case Style: Bowden v. Mission Petroleum Carriers et al 

Case Number: 2:06-cv-00665-WHA

Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 7.1, and this

Court’s General Order Miscellaneous Case No. 00-3047 parties are required to file their

Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement at their initial appearance.

No corporate/conflict disclosure statement has been filed by you in this action.

This deficiency must be corrected within ten (10) days from this date. Please refer to

attachment.

Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 23 Filed 04/03/2007 Page 1 of 1


**SAMPLE NOTICE FORMAT**

Note: When E-Filing this pleading, please enter a separate docket entry. The event entry is located on

CM/ECF by clicking: CIVIL > OTHER DOCUMENTS > CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

________________________ DIVISION

_________________________________, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. __________________

)

_________________________________, )

)

Defendants, )

CORPORATE/CONFLICT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

In accordance with the order of this Court, the undersigned party or parties to the

above-captioned matter do hereby make the following disclosure concerning parent

companies, subsidiaries, affiliates, partnership, joint ventures, debtor, creditors’ committee,

or other entities reportable under the provisions of the Middle District of Alabama’s General

Order No. 3047:

There are no entities to be reported.

- or -

The following entities are hereby reported:

____________________________________________________

____________________________________________________

____________________________________________________

 Signature 

 Date Counsel

 

Counsel for (print names of all parties)

 

Address, City, State Zip Code

 

Telephone Number

***Certificate of Service Required

Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 23-2 Filed 04/03/2007 Page 3 of 3
#### § 959.8 Registered handler.

*Registered handler* means any person with adequate facilities within the production area for preparing onions for commercial market, who customarily does so, and who is so recorded by the committee, or any person who has access to such facilities within the production area, and has recorded with the committee his ability and willingness to assume customary obligations of preparing onions for commercial market.
Subpart 439.1 - General

Parent topic: PART 439 - ACQUISITION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

439.101 Policy.

(a) In addition to policy and regulatory guidance contained in the FAR and AGAR:

(1) The USDA Information Technology Capital Planning and Investment Control Guide (CPIC)

establishes requirements for the acquisition of information technology.

(2) Specific thresholds at which USDA Office of the Chief Information Officer Information

Technology Acquisition Approval is required have been established.

(3) The procurement authority delegated to USDA Agencies is established in Departmental

Regulations 5000 series.

(4) The CPIC Guide and USDA CIO policy and procedural guidance are available on the USDA OCIO

Web site at http://www.ocio.usda.gov. Notices of changes in the Information Technology Acquisition

Approval Thresholds are also promulgated by AGAR Advisory.

(b) Acquisition of on-line courseware libraries and learning management system services requires

specific approval of the ASA and CIO. Information regarding the specific approval requirements and

processes is promulgated by AGAR Advisory.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2842 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2842

  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain work footwear with outer 
                           soles of leather.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 18, 2006

 Mr. Brownback introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain work footwear with outer 
                           soles of leather.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN WORK FOOTWEAR WITH OUTER SOLES OF LEATHER.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.13.83      Footwear with       Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         outer soles of                                                     31/2009
                         leather and
                         uppers of
                         leather, covering
                         the ankle, other
                         than for women
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         6403.51.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Appendix E to Chapter 7 [Reserved]

Parent topic: SUBCHAPTER H—CLAUSES AND FORMS
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2979 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Pyromellitic Dianhydride. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 23, 2006 

Mr. ISAKSON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Pyromellitic 

Dianhydride. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PYROMELLITIC DIANHYDRIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.05.14 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Pyromellitic dianhydride) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/ 

7 2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•S 2979 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
1 

### Muldoon, Albert (OST)

From: Joel A. Martin <jamartin@starband.net>

Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2012 6:17 PM

To: Muldoon, Albert (OST)

Subject: Requests for Comments, EAS Proposals for Chatham and Funter Bay

Attachments: Essential Air Service, Chatham and Funter Bay.pdf

Follow Up Flag: Follow up

Flag Status: Flagged

Good Afternoon:

As residents of Funter Bay the past eighteen years, it appears we should comment on the EAS proposals, as you request.

I have attached a copy of a letter sent to Bernard Calure, EAS & Domestic Analysis, dated 17 February, 1996. The

comments expressed in that message remain the same today with exception that we are now retired, doing consulting

work via the Internet and traveling somewhat less. Ward Air, Inc. has continued to provide the same level of service

mentioned in that letter, to Funter Bay.

We remain concerned that a change to any other air service would be most difficult for us. In addition to the comments

about Ward Air’s charter service expressed in our earlier letter, I would add that their pilots are thoroughly familiar

with the vagaries of negotiating Funter Bay’s weather variables, winter or summer, and in our case the fact that we

utilize three specific beach landing sites depending on the tides. (NOAA would list our rocky beach as ‘foul’).

We ask that you choose to continue with the same EAS provider.

Best regards,

Joel Martin and Patricia Woods

The Pyxis Enterprise

Electrical Systems Technology

1 South Shore Place

Funter Bay, AK

907

‐ 723

‐ 7365

jamartin@starband.net
§ 53.15 Accessibility to livestock. ( a ) The applicant shall cause livestock, with respect to which service is requested, to be made easily accessible for examination and to be so placed, with adequate illuminating facilities, as to disclose their class, grade, other quality, and compliance. Supervisors and other employees of the Department responsible for maintaining uniformity and accuracy of service under the regulations shall have access to all parts of establishments covered by approved applications for service under the regulations, for the purpose of examining all livestock in the establishments which have been or are to be graded or examined for compliance with specifications.
( b ) [Reserved]
#### § 900.26 Requesting USDA data for use at an amendatory hearing.

Requests for preparation of USDA data to be used at a Federal milk marketing agreement or order amendatory proceeding must be received by USDA at least 10 days before the beginning of the hearing. If an amendatory hearing is announced with less than 10 days before the start of the hearing, requests for data must be submitted within 2 days following publication of the notice of hearing in the Federal Register.