alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
7f2812015 RIJemllklrvtlrld Ndlces I Dapa1menl ~Energy 

--- • 

Search Energy.gov 

, Home » Appliance & Equipment standards • Rulemaklngs and Notk:es 

IRULEMAKINGS AND NOTICES ~ 

!The Department of Energy (DOE) sets energy efficiency standards and test procedures for more than filly residential, 

l

commercial, and industrial products. DOE is required to review these standards and test procedures periodically, and 

. initiates a process to set new standards provided that improvements to energy efficiency are Rtechnically feasible 

land economically justified." 

:.,CURRENT RULEMAKINGS 

I DOE maintains a summary table of current rulamaklngs and notices. Rulemaking pages provide infonnation on 

recent updates, provide links to related documents, describe how to participate in meetings or submit comments, and 

provide statutory authority for the rulemaking. 

TEST PROCEDURE WAIVERS 

DOE considers petitions for waivers from product test procedures under certain circumstances, and maintains a 

summary list of test procedure waivers still in effect. 

RECENT FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES 

The Appliance and Equipment Standards Program provides a list of Recant Federal Raglstar Notlcas published 

during the last six months. [Notices issued more than six months ago can be located through Currant Rulemaklngs 

pages, Standards and Test Procedures product pages (for previous rulemakings) or the Current Test Procedures 

Waivers list. All links to notices are to the relevant docket in regulations.gov. 

HOW TO PARTICIPATE OR COMMENT IN RULEMAKINGS 

Manufacturers, industry, and the general public may participate or comment on proposed rulemakings. 

Stakeholders can participate in rulemakings by viewing notices and other documentation, submitting comments, and 

attending public meetings. DOE maintains a table of current public meetings and comment p.-iod close dates. 

REGULATORY PROCESSES 

The Appliance and Equipment Standards program manages the regulatory processes associated Vtlith developing 

and updating appliance and equipment product standards. 

113 
7128.12015 RIJemakirgs rd Notices I Deps1mlri fl ErlBrg't 

APPLIANCE STANDARDS AND RULEMAKING FEDERAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE 

The DOE has created the Appliance Standards and Rulemaklng Federal Advisory Committee (ASRAC) in an 

effort to further improve the process of establishing energy efficiency standards for certain appliances and 

commercial equipment. 

PUBLIC MEETINGS & 

COMMENT DEADLINES 

RECENT FEDERAL 

REGISTER NOTICES 

CAREERS & INTERNSHIPS ) 

EEREHOME ) 

CONTACTEERE ) 

hllp:Jicn!6gy.govJeerao111JidlrgslriJemaklrgs-and-ncllces 213 
7128f2015 Rulemakings and Notices 1 Depcrtment of Energy 

ttlp:l/energy.gav/eerebuildirgslrulemakings-!l'ld-rdices 313
162 So.2d 12

#### Mrs. Olive Dawson BAUCUM v. Haroldson L. HUNT, Jr., TRUST ESTATE.

No. 47177.

March 31, 1964.

In re: Mrs. Olive Dawson Baucum applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Claiborne. 160 So.2d 250.

Writ refused. There appears no error of law in the judgment of the Court of Appeal.
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-14-0364 SAT Date: 3/7/2014 Print Date: 9/2/2014
Related cases :

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 2 2

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 1 11

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: N o Routes of exposure : Health: Inhalation Ecotox: All releases to water Fate: ;

P 2 Rec Comments : Comment: N o Commen t Keywords : Keywords: SEVER IRR/POSS CORR-E; AQUATOX-A,C Summary of Assessment : Fate : Fate Summary: P-14-0364 FATE: MW = 1093 with 0.69% < 500 and 16.98 % < 1000 Liquid with MP < 25 C (E) S = Disp. VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E) BP > 400 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E)POTW removal (%) = 50-90 via sorption and biodeg Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk-mo Sorption to soils/sediments = strong PBT Potential: P1B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = slow
Health : Health Summary: Absorption is nil through the skin, p oor through the GI tract, and moderate through the lung, based on physical/chemical properties. There is concern for severe irritation/ p ossible corrosin to the eye, based on the surfactant properties of the PMN substance. Test Data: Submitted with N egative in Salmonella with and without activation; N egative in E. coli with and without activation
Ecotox : Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments
fish 96-h LC50 5.4 daphnid 48-h LC50 4.6 green algal 96-h EC50 5.1 fish

_ chronic value 2.3 daphnid

_ chronic value 2.8 algal

_ chronic value 1.7 Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for nonionic surfactants; SAR chemical class = surfactant-nonionics-C15-EO15; MW 1093; S = dispersible at 20 C (P); p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <180.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;
Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 170

SARs N onionic Surfactants SAR Class N onionic Surfactants Ecotox Category N onionic Surfactants
Ecotox Factors Comments:SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
§ 932.34 Powers. The committee shall have the following powers: ( a ) To administer this subpart in accordance with its terms and provisions;
( b ) To make rules and regulations to effectuate the terms and provisions of this subpart;
( c ) To receive, investigate, and report to the Secretary complaints of violations of the provisions of this subpart; and
( d ) To recommend to the Secretary amendments to this subpart.
Case 3:06-cv-00627-WKW-SRW Document 2 Filed 07/19/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-00627-WKW-SRW Document 2 Filed 07/19/2006 Page 2 of 2
§ 633.9 Conservation plan. ( a ) The program participant, with assistance from NRCS and in consultation with the Conservation District, shall prepare a conservation plan for the acreage designated under an agreement.
( b ) The conservation plan is the basis for the agreement and is incorporated therein. It includes a schedule of conservation treatment and management required to protect and to maintain the wetland and adjacent land as a functional wetland unit for the life of the agreement.
( c ) Conservation treatment and management of the vegetation for wetland protection, wildlife habitat, or other authorized objectives are consistent with the program objectives and priorities.
#### Bi-Economy Market, Inc., Appellant, v Harleysville Insurance Company of New York et al., Respondents.

Submitted July 2, 2007;

decided September 6, 2007

Reported below, 37 AD3d 1184.

Motion by New York Public Adjusters Association for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted. Two copies of the brief must be served and 24 copies filed within seven days.
MINUTES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN, DIVISION

HON. SUSAN RUSS WALKER, MAG JUDGE AT MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA

DATE COMMENCED: September 22, 2006 9:06

DATE COMPLETED: September 22, 2006 9:20

WAYNE BLACK *

vs * 1:03cr734-MEF

LAMAR GLOVER, COMMANDER BOWERS *

SGT. TURNER *

__________________________________________________________________________________________

PLAINTIFF APPEARANCES: DEFENDANT

*

Wayne Black, pro se * Gary Clayborn Sherrer

*

____________________________________________ *____________________________________________

COURT OFFICIALS PRESENT:

Joyce Taylor, Courtroom Deputy

PROCEEDINGS:

TELEPHONE CONFERENCE

9:06 a.m. Telephone conference begins.

Court's discussions with plaintiff regarding his request for witness subpoenas.

9:07 a.m. Court goes through each named witness with plaintiff as to why he wants these witnesses

subpoenaed and Court's discussions with Mr. Sherrer as to which witnesses will require a

subpoena.

Mr. Sherrer's discussions with plaintiff regarding plaintiff letting Mr. Sherrer know

what order plaintiff will call his witnesses so Mr. Sherrer can have them available.

Continued discussions regarding witnesses to be subpoenaed.

9:20 a.m. Court recessed

Case 1:03-cv-00734-MEF-SRW Document 31 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 1 of 1
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2013-0635 Directorate ID: 2012-SW-081-AD

Helicopter Model: Eurocopter France Model EC225LP Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): Three Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The proposed actions of this AD are intended to detect corrosion or a crack in the 

swashplates, which could lead to failure of the swashplates and subsequent loss of helicopter 

control.

Costs:

 Inspecting the rotating and stationary swashplates for corrosion or a crack would 

require 8 work-hours for a cost of $680 per helicopter and $2,040 for the U.S. fleet, per 

inspection cycle. Making and installing the placard would require 0.5 work-hour, for a cost of 

$43 per helicopter. The labor cost of installing paper in the flight manual would be negligible for 

a helicopter.

 Replacing the MRH assembly would require 24 work-hours and parts would cost 

$5,000, for a total cost of $7,040 per helicopter.

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Gary Roach
#### Louis Todd, Respondent, v. John W. McGrath Corp., Defendant-Appellant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Gus Milazzo, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered March 18, 1966, reversed, on the law and the facts, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, unless, within 30 days after entry of the order hereon, plaintiff shall serve and file a written stipulation consenting to reduce the amount of the jury verdict in his favor to $30,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment accordingly. In the event such stipulation be served and filed, the award of damages to defendant on its third-party complaint is correspondingly reduced, and the judgment, as so reduced and amended with respect to all parties, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. Findings of fact implicit in the trial court’s decision setting aside the jury verdict in the third-party action and directing judgment over in favor of the third-party plaintiff against the third-party defendant are affirmed, except as to the amount of the award of damages. In our opinion, the jury verdict in favor of plaintiff and the trial court’s award of damages in the third-party action were excessive to the extent indicated. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
#### § 917.26 Failure to nominate.

If nominations are not made within the time and in the manner prescribed in §§ 917.21 through 917.24, the Secretary may, without regard to nominations, select the member and alternate members of commodity committees on the basis of representation provided in § 917.21. In the event nominations are not made for membership on the Control Committee, pursuant to the provisions of §§ 917.17 and 917.18, by May 1 of each year, the Secretary may select such members without waiting for nominees to be designated.

[41 FR 17528, Apr. 27, 1976, as amended at 56 FR 46369, Sept. 12, 1991; 76 FR 66605, Oct. 27, 2011]

###### Effective Date Note

#### Effective Date Note:

At 76 FR 66605, Oct. 27, 2011, § 917.26 was suspended indefinitely, effective Oct. 28, 2011.
§ 906.34 Assessments. ( a ) The funds to cover the committee's expenses shall be acquired by the levying of assessments upon handlers as provided in this subpart. Each handler who first handles fruit shall, with respect to the fruit so handled by him, pay assessments to the committee upon demand, which assessments shall be in payment of such handler's pro rata share of the committee's expenses.
( b ) Assessments shall be levied upon handlers at rates established by the Secretary. Such rates may be established upon the basis of the committee's recommendations and other available information. Such rates may be applied to specified containers used in the production area.
( c ) The rate of assessment may be increased at any time by the Secretary if he finds such increase is necessary in order that the money collected shall be adequate to cover the committee's expenses during a given fiscal period. Such increase shall be applicable to all fruit handled during such fiscal period.
( d ) The payment of assessments for the maintenance and functioning of the committee may be required under this part throughout the period it is in effect irrespective of whether particular provisions of this part are suspended or become inoperative.
[25 FR 9093, Sept. 22, 1960. Redesignated at 26 FR 12751, Dec. 30, 1961, as amended at 88 FR 82232, Nov. 24, 2023]
# 5239.7304 Determination and notification.

****(c)(2) When the contracting activity participates in          preparing the required notification, the notice shall be submitted to DASN(P) by email at             usn.pentagon.asstsecnavrdadc.mbx.pabt@us.navy.mil with the subject          “[Activity Name] DFARS 239.7304(c)(2)- Notice for SAE Approval for Exclusion and Limitation          on Disclosure of IT Assessed for Supply Chain Risk.”

**Parent topic:**Subpart 5239.73 - REQUIREMENTS FOR INFORMATION RELATING TO SUPPLY CHAIN RISK
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12

- 50822 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

MARIO AVILA

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:10

- CR

- 1205

- 7

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Mario Av ila has moved for leave to

withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386
U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Avila

h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brie f and the relevant
portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment
that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 2 1 , 2014
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 12-50822 Document: 00512539669 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2014No. 12

- 50822

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 12-50822 Document: 00512539669 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/21/2014
The Honorable Edward L. Filippine, United States District Judge for the Eastern 1 District of Missouri. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-1282

___________ Michael J. Landy, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Appeal from the United States Lisa Colleen Mangogna; Thomas * District Court for the Mangogna; Barbara Mangogna; * Eastern District of Missouri. Father Quirk; Associated Catholic * Charities of the Archdiocese of St. * [UNPUBLISHED] Louis; Associated Catholic Charities * of the Archdiocese of Washington, * D.C., * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: March 5, 1998 Filed: March 19, 1998

___________ Before FAGG, BEAM, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. In thi s diversity action alleging fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud, Michael J. Landy appeals the district court & s orders dismissing without prejudice his second 1-2-

am endedcomplaint, denying his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) motion, an d denying him leave to file a third amended complaint. After carefully reviewing th e record and the parties & submissions, we affirm the judgment of the district court for the reasons set forth in its memoranda and orders. See8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
§ 770.3 Eligibility requirements. An applicant must: ( a ) Submit a completed Agency application form;
( b ) Except for refinancing activities authorized in § 770.4(c), obtain an option or other acceptable purchase agreement for land to be purchased with loan funds;
( c ) Be a Native American tribe or a tribal corporation of a Native American tribe without adequate uncommitted funds, based on Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, or another financial accounting method acceptable to Secretary of Interior to acquire lands or interests therein within the Native American tribe's reservation for the use of the Native American tribe or tribal corporation or the members of either;
( d ) Be unable to obtain sufficient credit elsewhere at reasonable rates and terms for purposes established in § 770.4;
( e ) Demonstrate reasonable prospects of success in the proposed operation of the land to be purchased with funds provided under this part by providing: ( 1 ) A feasibility plan for the use of the Native American tribe's land and other enterprises and funds from any other source from which payment will be made;
( 2 ) A satisfactory management and repayment plan; and
( 3 ) A satisfactory record for paying obligations.
( f ) Unless waived by the FSA Administrator, not have any outstanding debt with any Federal Agency (other than debt under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986) which is in a delinquent status.
( g ) Not be subject to a judgment lien against the tribe's property arising out of a debt to the United States.
( h ) Have not received a write-down as provided in § 770.10(e) within the preceding 5 years.
[66 FR 1567, Jan. 9, 2001, as amended at 70 FR 7167, Feb. 11, 2005]
###### Editorial Note on Part 91

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 91 appear at 61 FR 51350, Oct. 2 1996.

#### § 91.12 Record of filing time and laboratory tests.

A record showing the date of receipt for each application for a laboratory service or an appeal of a laboratory service shall be maintained. In addition, the requested laboratory analyses shall be recorded at the time of sample receipt.
§ 760.1810 Time and method of application. ( a ) A completed FSA-898, Quality Loss Adjustment (QLA) Program Application, must be submitted in person, by mail, email, or facsimile to any FSA county office by the close of business on March 5, 2020.
( b ) An application submitted in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section is not considered valid and complete for issuance of payment under this subpart unless FSA determines all the applicable eligibility provisions have been satisfied and the producer has submitted all of following by March 19, 2020: ( 1 ) Documentation required by § 760.1811;
( 2 ) FSA-578, Report of Acreage, for all acreage for any crop for which payments under this subpart are requested;
( 3 ) FSA-895, Crop Insurance and/or NAP Coverage Agreement; and
( 4 ) For forage crops, FSA-899, Historical Nutritional Value Weighted Average Worksheet, if verifiable documentation of historical nutrient factors is available.
( c ) In addition to the forms listed in paragraph (b) of this section, applicants must also submit all the following eligibility forms within 60 days from the date of signing the QLA Program application if not already on file with FSA: ( 1 ) AD-1026, Highly Erodible Land Conservation (HELC) and Wetland Conservation Certification;
( 2 ) CCC-902 Automated, Farm Operating Plan for Payment Eligibility 2009 and Subsequent Program Years;
( 3 ) CCC-941 Average Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) Certification and Consent to Disclosure of Tax Information; and
( 4 ) CCC-942 Certification of Income from Farming, Ranching and Forestry Operations, if applicable.
( d ) Failure to submit all required forms by the applicable deadlines in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section may result in no payment or a reduced payment.
( e ) Application approval and payment by FSA does not relieve a participant from having to submit any form required, but not filed, according to this section.
( f ) Once signed by a producer, the application is considered to contain information and certifications of and pertaining to the producer regardless of who entered the information on the application.
( g ) The producer applying for payment under this subpart certifies the accuracy and truthfulness of the information provided in the application as well as any documentation filed with or in support of the application. All information is subject to verification or spot check by FSA at any time, either before or after payment is issued. Refusal to allow FSA or any agency of the USDA to verify any information provided will result in the participant's forfeiting eligibility for payment under this subpart. FSA may at any time, including before, during, or after processing and paying an application, require the producer to submit any additional information necessary to implement or determine any eligibility provision of this subpart. Furnishing information specified in this subpart is voluntary; however, FSA may choose not to act on the application or approve payment if the required information is not provided. Providing a false certification will result in ineligibility and can also be punishable by imprisonment, fines, and other penalties.
Editorial Note on Part 762
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 762 appear at 72 FR 63297, Nov. 8, 2007.

§ 762.104 Appeals. ( a ) A decision made by the lender adverse to the borrower is not a decision by the Agency, whether or not concurred in by the Agency, and may not be appealed.
( b ) The lender or Agency may request updated information from the borrower to implement an appeal decision.
( c ) Appeals will be handled in accordance with parts 11 and 780 of this title.
[64 FR 7378, Feb. 12, 1999, as amended at 72 FR 63297, Nov. 8, 2007]
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Authority:

7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 868.203 Basis of determination.

The determination of seeds, objectionable seeds, heat-damaged kernels, red rice and damaged kernels, chalky kernels, other types, color, and the special grade Parboiled rough rice shall be on the basis of the whole and large broken kernels of milled rice that are produced in the milling of rough rice to a well-milled degree. When determining class, the percentage of (a) whole kernels of rough rice shall be determined on the basis of the original sample, and (b) types of rice shall be determined on the basis of the whole and large broken kernels of milled rice that are produced in the milling of rough rice to a well-milled degree. Smutty kernels shall be determined on the basis of the rough rice after it has been cleaned and shelled as prescribed in FGIS instructions, or by any method that is approved by the Administrator as giving equivalent results. All other determinations shall be on the basis of the original sample. Mechanical sizing of kernels shall be adjusted by handpicking as prescribed in FGIS instructions, or by any method that is approved by the Administrator as giving equivalent results.

[42 FR 40869, Aug. 12, 1977; 42 FR 64356, Dec. 23, 1977, as amended at 47 FR 34516, Aug. 10, 1982; 54 FR 21403, May 18, 1989. Redesignated at 60 FR 16364, Mar. 30, 1995]