alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
APPENDIX - FF Table Of Contents       DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PLAN FOR CONTROL OF NONSTANDARD CLAUSES    DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PLAN FOR CONTROL OF NONSTANDARD      CLAUSES    September 3, 2014       1. PURPOSE. The purpose of this plan is to          implement, maintain, and comply with a plan for controlling the use of clauses other than          those prescribed in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and the Defense Federal          Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) as required in DFARS 201.304(4). This plan          supersedes the July 31, 2009, update.       2. DEFINITIONS.       a. Clause – The term “clause” includes solicitation          provisions and means a term or condition of the type set forth in FAR part 52 and DFARS          part 252.       b. Deviation – The term “deviation” includes any clause          that is inconsistent with the FAR or DFARS.       c. Regulation – The term “regulation” includes any          contracting supplement, policy letter, clause book, automated system, acquisition          instruction (AI), or similar regulatory instrument.       3. REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF NONSTANDARD CLAUSES. Army          contracting activities coordinate all nonstandard clauses with the Office of the Deputy          Assistant Secretary of the Army (Procurement) (ODASA(P)) Policy and Programs Directorate in          accordance with Army Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (AFARS) 5101.304(1)(i). The          ODASA(P) Policy and Programs Directorate coordinates with the Office of the Army General          Counsel during review of nonstandard clauses.       a. Director of Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy          (DPAP) Clause Approval –       (1) Obtain DPAP approval to use clauses that have a          significant effect beyond the internal operating procedures of the Army or impose a          significant cost or administrative impact on contractors or offerors (DFARS 201.304(1)).          Included are class deviations from the FAR or DFARS (DFARS 201.404(b)) and the six          categories of individual deviations set forth in DFARS 201.402(1).       (2) Coordinate with the ODASA(P) Policy and Programs          Directorate to publish clauses requiring DPAP approval in the *Federal Register*,          conduct analysis to ensure compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act and the Regulatory          Flexibility Act (FAR 1.301(c)), and analyze public comments. Submit the clause and all          analysis through the Defense Acquisition Regulations (DAR) Council Director (DFARS          201.304(5) and AFARS 5101.301(b)).       b. Other than DPAP Clause Approval –       (1) Obtain Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army          (Procurement) (DASA(P)) approval to use clauses that do not require DPAP approval and do          not require publication in the *Federal Register* for public comment, but are included          in contracting activity AIs or clause books.       1
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

LEROY WILLIAMS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO 2:06-cv-658-TFM

)

STATE OF ALABAMA DEP’T OF )

TRANSPORTATION, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the parties shall convene for a Status Conference on July 12,

2007 at 10:00 a.m.. The conference shall be heard in District Courtroom 4A, Frank M.

Johnson, Jr. United States Courthouse Complex, One Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama.

The conference shall be attended by at least one of the attorneys representing each of the

parties and by any party who is not represented by an attorney. 

DONE this 11th day of July, 2007.

/s/Terry F. Moorer

TERRY F. MOORER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00658-TFM Document 45 Filed 07/11/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### § 70.36 Order of service.

Grading service shall be performed, insofar as practicable and subject to the availability of qualified graders, in the order in which applications therefor are made, except that precedence may be given to any application for an appeal grading.

[41 FR 23681, June 11, 1976, unless otherwise noted. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977, and further redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981, and further redesignated at 84 FR 49643, Sept. 23, 2019]
#### § 917.12 Container.

*Container* means a box, bag, crate, lug, basket, carton, package, or any other type of receptacle used in the packaging or handling of fruit.

###### Effective Date Note

#### Effective Date Note:

At 76 FR 66605, Oct. 27, 2011, § 917.12 was suspended indefinitely, effective Oct. 28, 2011.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Gary Allen Morse, Donald Robert Rogers and Douglas Phillip Salls, Appellants.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted (Code Crim. Pro., § 535). Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur.
#### § 927.5 Size.

*Size* means the number of pears which can be packed in a 44-pound net weight standard box or container equivalent, or as “size” means the greatest transverse diameter of the pear taken at right angles to a line running from the stem to the blossom end, or such other specifications more specifically defined in a regulation issued under this part.
# L_2014221EN.01002601.xml

| 25.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 221/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 221/26

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision 2014/415/EU of 24 June 2014 on the arrangements for the implementation by the Union of the solidarity clause

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 192 of 1 July 2014
  )

On the cover, in the table of contents:

for:

‘2014/415/EU

Council Decision of 24 June 2014 on the arrangements for the implementation by the Union of the solidarity clause’,

read:

‘Council Decision 2014/415/CFSP of 24 June 2014 on the arrangements for the implementation by the Union of the solidarity clause’;

on page 53, in the title:

for:

‘COUNCIL DECISION

of 24 June 2014

on the arrangements for the implementation by the Union of the solidarity clause

(2014/415/EU)’,

read:

‘COUNCIL DECISION 2014/415/CFSP

of 24 June 2014

on the arrangements for the implementation by the Union of the solidarity clause’.

---
52.241-1 Electric Service Territory

Compliance Representation.

As prescribed in 41.501(b), insert a provision substantially the same as the following:

Electric Service Territory Compliance Representation (May 1999)

(a) Section 8093 of Public Law100-202 generally requires purchases of electricity by any

department, agency, or instrumentality of the United States to be consistent with State law

governing the provision of electric utility service, including State utility commission rulings and

electric utility franchises or service territories established pursuant to State statute, State

regulation, or State-approved territorial agreements.

(b) By signing this offer, the offeror represents that this offer to sell electricity is consistent with

Section 8093 of Public Law100-202.

(c) Upon request of the Contracting Officer, the offeror shall submit supporting legal and factual

rationale for this representation.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.241 Utility Services Provisions and Clauses.
Search Help More Search Options 

Printable Version 

Residential Clothes 

Dryers and Room Air 

Conditioners 

Preliminary 

Analytical Tools 

The U.S. Department of Energy 

(DOE) prepared the analytical 

spreadsheets listed below for 

the preliminary analyses 

conducted for the energy 

conservation standards 

rulemaking on residential 

clothes dryers and room air 

conditioners. 

Life-Cycle Cost (LCC) and 

Payback Period (PBP) 

Spreadsheets

z LCC for Clothes Dryers 

(Excel 2.4 MB) 

z LCC for Room Air 

Conditioners (Excel 2.9 

MB) 

National Impacts Analysis 

(NIA) Spreadsheets

z NIA for Clothes Dryers 

(Excel 2.0 MB) 

z NIA for Room Air 

Conditioners (Excel 1.4 

MB) 

Contact Information 

 

Stephen Witkowski

Project Manager 

(202) 586-7436 

EERE Information Center 

Programs and Offices 

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards: Residential Clothes Dryers and Room... Page 1 of 2

http://www2.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/residential/preliminary_analyti... 3/3/2010

EERE-2007-BT-STD-0010 COMMENT 20.2
Building Technologies Program Home | EERE Home | U.S. Department of Energy

Webmaster | Web Site Policies | Security & Privacy | USA.gov 

Content Last Updated: 02/26/2010 

Printable Version 

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards: Residential Clothes Dryers and Room... Page 2 of 2

http://www2.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/residential/preliminary_analyti... 3/3/2010

EERE-2007-BT-STD-0010 COMMENT 20.2
5239.001 Applicability.

(a) All requests for DOD CIO approval of acquisition of a data server farm, data center or

information systems technology used in a data center shall be submitted to DASN(P) by email at

usn.pentagon.asstsecnavrdadc.mbx.pabt@us.navy.mil with the subject “[Activity Name] FAR 39.001

- Data Farm/Center IT Approval.”

Parent topic: Part 5239 - ACQUISITION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 17, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-50682 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus HILARIO VILLA TELLEZ, also known as Arturo Villanueva-Garcia, also known as Hilario Villa-Telles, also known as Hilario Villa-Tellas, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:03-CR-2016-ALL-KC

-------------------- Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Hilario Villa Tellez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-18 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 1 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-18 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 2 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-18 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 3 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-18 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 4 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-18 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 5 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-18 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 6 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-18 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 7 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-18 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 8 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-18 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 9 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-18 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 10 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-18 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 11 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-18 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 12 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-18 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 13 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-18 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 14 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-18 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 15 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-18 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 16 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-18 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 17 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-18 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 18 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-18 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 19 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-18 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 20 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-18 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 21 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-18 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 22 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-18 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 23 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-18 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 24 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-18 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 25 of 25
EX-33 (j)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Document Custody
1015 10th Avenue SE
Minneapolis, MN 55414


Appendix I


ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA

Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
(the "Company") is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the
Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company has determined that the
servicing criteria are applicable in regard to the servicing platform for the
period as follows:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed
securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities issued on or after January
1, 2006, for which the Company provides document custody services, excluding any
publicly issued transactions issued by any government sponsored entity (the
"Platform").

Applicable Servicing Criteria: The servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii), in regard to the activities performed by the
Company with respect to the Platform (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria"). The
Company has determined that all other servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d) are not applicable to the Platform.

Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2006 (the "Period").

With respect to the Platform, the Company provides the following
assessment of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

1. The Company is responsible for assessing the Company's compliance with
the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period.

2. The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria. In performing this assessment, the Company used the criteria set forth
by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of
Regulation AB.

3. Based on such assessment, as of and for the Period, the Company has
complied, in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation
report with respect to the Company's assessment of compliance as of and for the
Period.


WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

By: /s/ Shari L. Gillund
Shari L. Gillund

Its: Senior Vice President

Dated: March 1, 2007
§ 81.5 General requirements. ( a ) To be eligible for this program, the trees to be removed must have yielded at least 1.5 tons of dried prune/plums per net-planted acre during the 1999 or 2000 crop year. A net-planted acre is the actual acreage planted with prune-plum trees. Abandoned orchards and dead trees will not qualify. In new orchards diverted, qualifying trees must be at least 5 years of age (6th leaf), contain at least two scaffolds, and be capable of producing at least 1.5 tons per net-planted acre. The block of trees for removal must be easily definable by separations from other blocks and contain at least 1,000 eligible trees or comprise an entire orchard.
( b ) Any grower participating in this program must agree not to replant prune-plum trees on the land cleared under this program through June 30, 2004. Participants bear responsibility for ensuring that trees are not replanted, whether by themselves, or by successors to the land, or by others, until after June 30, 2004. If trees are replanted before June 30, 2004, by any persons, participants must refund any USDA payment, with interest, made in connection with this tree removal program.
§ 769.152 Eligibility requirements of the intermediary. ( a ) *Eligible entity types.* Cooperatives, credit unions, and nonprofit organizations are eligible to participate as intermediaries.
( b ) *Certification.* The intermediary must be certified as a community development financial institution under 12 CFR 1805.201 to operate as a lender.
( c ) *Citizenship.* The applicant and the members of the intermediary must be a U.S. citizen or qualified alien (see 8 U.S.C. 1641). Each intermediary must certify to the citizenship requirement in the HPRP loan application.
( d ) *Experience.* The intermediary must have: ( 1 ) The requisite experience and capability in making and servicing agricultural and commercial loans that are similar in nature to HPRP. If consultants will be used in the making and servicing of HPRP loans, the Agency will assess the intermediary's experience in choosing and supervising consultants based on information intermediaries include in their application describing the particular lending functions they typically rely on agents to fulfill and also describe their policies and procedures for monitoring these agents;
( 2 ) The legal authority necessary to carry out the proposed loan purposes and to obtain, provide security for, and repay the proposed loan; and
( 3 ) Demonstrated ability and willingness to repay the loan based on the intermediary's financial condition, managerial capabilities, and other resources.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3264 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3264

To suspend temporarily the duty on staple fibers of viscose rayon, not 
          carded, combed, or otherwise processed for spinning.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 26, 2006

Mr. Frist (for Mrs. Dole) introduced the following bill; which was read 
             twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on staple fibers of viscose rayon, not 
          carded, combed, or otherwise processed for spinning.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STAPLE FIBERS OF VISCOSE RAYON, NOT CARDED, COMBED, OR 
              OTHERWISE PROCESSED FOR SPINNING.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.55.04        Staple fibers of        Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           viscose rayon, not                                                31/2009          ''
                           carded, combed, or                                                                  .
                           otherwise processed
                           for spinning
                           (provided for in
                           subheading
                           5504.10.00)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 945.88 Derogation.

Nothing contained in this subpart is, or shall be construed to be, in derogation or in modification of the rights of the Secretary or of the United States to exercise any powers, granted by the act or otherwise, or, in accordance with such powers, to act in the premises whenever such action is deemed advisable.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION

MARIE TOOLE and CHRIS TOOLE, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-00652-MHT

)

MATTHEW CHUPP; DON BRAMLETT)

and ALFA INSURANCE COMPANY )

and fictitious defendants A-F, )

)

Defendants. )

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Come Now Matthew Chupp and Don Bramlett, two of the Defendants in the above-styled

cause, who move this Court to grant summary judgment in their favor pursuant to Rule 56 of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on the grounds that there are no genuine issues of material fact to

be submitted to a jury and these Defendants are entitled to the entry of judgment as a matter of law.

In support of this motion, Defendants rely on the following:

1. Exhibit A - Copy of Plaintiff’s Complaint

2. Exhibit B - Excerpts of the Deposition Testimony of Marie Toole.

3. Exhibit C - Excerpts of the Deposition Testimony of Matthew Chupp. 

4. Exhibit D - Excerpts of the Deposition Testimony of Don Bramlett.

5. Memorandum Brief in Support of Defendants’ Motion for Summary

Judgement, filed contemporaneously with this motion.

Wherefore, based upon the foregoing, Defendants Matthew Chupp and Don Bramlett

respectfully request that this Court grant their Motion for Summary Judgment and dismiss the

Plaintiff’s claims as a matter of law.

Case 2:06-cv-00652-MHT-WC Document 18 Filed 01/05/2007 Page 1 of 2
Respectfully Submitted this 5th day of January, 2007.

 /s/ Randall Morgan 

RANDALL MORGAN [MOR037]

DOY LEALE MCCALL, III [MCC087]

Attorneys for Defendants Matthew Chupp and

Don Bramlett

 OF COUNSEL:

HILL, HILL, CARTER, FRANCO,

COLE & BLACK, P.C.

425 South Perry Street

P.O. Box 116

Montgomery, AL 36101-0116

(334) 834-7600

(334) 263-5969 - FAX

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that the foregoing has been duly served by electronic filing and by placing

a copy of same in the U.S. Mail, properly addressed and first class postage prepaid this the 5th day

of January, 2007 upon the following:

Jim S. Calton, Jr., Esq.

CALTON & CALTON

226 East Broad Street

P O Box 895

Eufaula, AL 36072

FAX - 334-687-3564

www.attorneycalton.com

Courtney R. Potthoff, Esq.

Joel P. Smith, Jr., Esq.

WILLIAMS, POTTHOFF, 

 WILLIAMS & SMITH, LLC

125 South Orange Avenue

Eufaula, Alabama 36072

 /s/ Randall Morgan 

OF COUNSEL

Case 2:06-cv-00652-MHT-WC Document 18 Filed 01/05/2007 Page 2 of 2
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2923 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Vinclozolin. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 22, 2006 

Mr. KYL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Vinclozolin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. VINCLOZOLIN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.01.19 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Vinclozolin) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and in7 serting ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS