alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 9.2 Definitions. The following definitions apply to subparts A through C of this part. The definitions in parts 718 and 1400 of this title apply, except where they conflict with the definitions in this section. *AMS* means USDA's Agricultural Marketing Service.
*Application* means the CFAP application form.
*Cattle* means commercially raised or maintained bovine animals, excluding beefalo, bison, and animals used for dairy production or intended for dairy production.
*Commodity* means an agricultural commodity produced in the United States and intended to be marketed for commercial production that has been designated as eligible for payments under CFAP.
*Controlled environment* means an environment in which everything that can practicably be controlled by the producer with structures, facilities, and growing media (including but not limited to water, soil, or nutrients), is in fact controlled by the producer, as determined by industry standards.
*Foreign entity* means a corporation, trust, estate, or other similar organization that has more than 10 percent of its beneficial interest held by individuals who are not: ( 1 ) Citizens of the United States; or
( 2 ) Lawful aliens possessing a valid Alien Registration Receipt Card.
*Foreign person* means any person who is not a citizen or national of the United States or who is admitted into the United States for permanent residence under the Immigration and Nationality Act and possesses a valid Alien Registration Receipt Card issued by the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security.
*Hogs* means any swine 120 pounds or more.
*NOFA* means a Notice of Funding Availability published in the Federal Register.
*Ownership interest* means to have either legal ownership interest or beneficial ownership interest in a legal entity. For the purposes of administering CFAP, a person or legal entity that owns a share or stock in a legal entity that is a corporation, limited liability company, limited partnership, or similar type entity, and shares in the profits or losses of such entity is considered to have an ownership interest in such legal entity. A person or legal entity that is a beneficiary of a trust or heir of an estate who benefits from the profits or losses of such entity is also considered to have an ownership interest in such legal entity.
*Pigs* means any swine weighing less than 120 pounds.
*Wool* means the fiber sheared from a live sheep and includes, unless noted otherwise, graded and nongraded wool. Graded wool is paid on a clean basis, and ungraded wool is paid on a greasy basis.
[85 FR 30830, May 21, 2020, as amended at 85 FR 35799, June 12, 2020; 85 FR 59175, Sept. 21, 2020; 85 FR 59384, Sept. 22, 2020; 88 FR 1876, Jan. 11, 2023]
5235.006 Contracting methods and contract

type.

(b)(ii)(B) When the milestone decision authority is USD(A&S), submit notifications via DASN(P) by

email at usn.pentagon.asstsecnavrdadc.mbx.pabt@us.navy.mil with the subject “[Activity Name]

DFARS 235.006 – Major Defense Program – Intent NOT to Exercise a Fixed Price Production Option

on a Development Contract.”

(b)(iii)(B) Requests for USD(A&S) prenegotiation position or negotiated agreements approval are to

be submitted via DASN(P) by email at usn.pentagon.asstsecnavrdadc.mbx.pabt@us.navy.mil with the

subject “[Activity Name] DFARS 235.006 – [Prenegotiation Position/Negotiated Agreement] Approval

Request.”

Parent topic: Part 5235 - RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING
#### § 905.350 [Reserved]
#### § 920.9 Grower.

*Grower* is synonymous with producer and means any person who produces kiwifruit for the fresh market and who has a proprietary interest therein.
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant
to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 18, 2006 (the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables
Trust 2006-B-G (the Trust), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Corp., AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the
Servicer) and AFS Sensub Corp. in connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Controller of the Servicer. I further certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from September 18, 2006 through December 31, 2006,
and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge,
there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     |  |                                      |  |  |  |        |  |               
|------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------ |  |  |  | ------ |  | --------------
|AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. |  |                                      |  |  |  |       
|                                     |  |                                      |  | 
|By:                                  |  | /s/ James Fehleison                  |  |  |  | Dated: |  | March 30, 2007
|                                     |  | James Fehleison                      |  |  |  |        |  |               
|                                     |  | Executive Vice President, Controller |  |  |  |        |  |
Exhibit 34.1.3

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Board of Directors of Fifth Third Mortgage Company:

 

We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Fifth Third Mortgage Company (the “Company”) compiled with servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the “CFR”) for the Residential Mortgage Loans sold to Non-Government-Sponsored Entities starting January 1, 2006 Platform (the “Platform”) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, excluding criteria 229.1122(d)(1)(iii), (d)(2)(iv), (d)(3)(i)(c), (d)(4)(xi), and (d)(4)(xv) of the CFR, which management has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform. Exhibit A to management’s assertion identifies the individual asset-backed transaction defined by management as constituting the Platform.Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria during the specified period and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed transaction included inthe Platform. Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance rising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 for Residential Mortgage Loans sold to Non-Government-Sponsored Entities starting January 1, 2006 Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Cincinnati, Ohio

March 9, 2007
# 5132.006 Reduction or suspension of contract payments upon finding of fraud.

- 5132.006-1 General. 
- 5132.006-2 Definition. 
- 5132.006-3 Responsibilities. 

**Parent topic:**Part 5132 - Contract Financing
Subpart 248.2 - (REMOVED)

(October 01, 2001)

Parent topic: Part 248 - RESERVED
#### § 945.12 Fiscal period.

*Fiscal period* means the period beginning and ending on the dates approved by the Secretary pursuant to recommendations by the committee.
|T H E   W H I T E   H O U S E

Bulletin No. 99-07, Supplement 2

Help

Text Only | T H E   W H I T E   H O U S E    | Bulletin No. 99-07, Supplement 2 | Help

Text Only
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------- | -------------------------------- | ---------------
|T H E   W H I T E   H O U S E                                                    | Bulletin No. 99-07, Supplement 2 | Help

Text Only                 

|
|

|November 1, 1999 
                         BULLETIN NO. 99-07, Supplement No. 2 
                         TO THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND ESTABLISHMENTS 
                         SUBJECT:  Apportionment Under the Extension of the Continuing
                                Resolution for Fiscal Year 2000 
                         1. Purpose and background. H. J. Res. 73 extends the
                                continuing resolution through November 5, 1999. 
                         2. Apportionment. I am extending the automatic
                                apportionment specified in section 2 of OMB Bulletin No. 99-07 to November 5,
                                1999. The portion of the year covered is now 9.8 percent. 
                         If you can justify amounts greater than the amount automatically
                                apportioned, please submit a written request for apportionment. 
                         Jacob J. LewDirector 

The Budget
 | 
Legislative Information
 | 
Management Reform/GPRA
 | 
Grants Management
Financial Management
 | 
Procurement
        Policy
 | 
Information &
        Regulatory Policy

Privacy Statement
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
§ 906.45 Inspection and certification. ( a ) During any period in which handling of a variety of a type of fruit is regulated pursuant to §§ 906.34, 906.40, 906.42, or any combination thereof, no handler shall handle any variety of such type of fruit which has not been inspected by an authorized representative of the Federal or Federal-State Inspection Service, unless such handling is relieved from such requirements pursuant to § 906.41 or § 906.42, or both;
( b ) Regrading, resorting, or repacking any lot of fruit shall invalidate any prior inspection insofar as the requirements of this section are concerned. No handler shall handle fruit after it has been regraded, resorted, repacked, or in any other way prepared for market, unless each lot of fruit is inspected by an authorized representative of the Federal or Federal-State Inspection Service: *Provided,* That the committee, with the approval of the Secretary, may provide for waiving inspection requirements on any fruit in circumstances where it appears reasonably certain that, after regrading, resorting, or repacking, such fruit meets the applicable quality and other standards then in effect;
( c ) Insofar as the requirements of this section are concerned, the length of time for which an inspection certificate is valid may be established by the committee with the approval of the Secretary;
( d ) When fruit is inspected in accordance with the requirements of this section a copy of each inspection certificate issued shall be made available to the committee by the inspection service;
( e ) The committee may recommend and the Secretary may require that any fruit handled or transported by motor vehicle shall be accompanied by a copy of the inspection certificate issued thereon, which certificate shall be surrendered to such authority as may be designated.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

NICHOLAS STRICKLAND, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) 1:06-CV-00682-DRB

)

CHAMPION ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., )

 )

Defendants. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that Plaintiffs respond not later than September 22, 2006, to show

any cause for not granting Defendants’ Motion to Strike Jury Deman as to Alter Ego Claims

and to Stay Alter Ego Claims (Doc. 10, filed September 7, 2006).

DONE THIS 8 DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2006. TH

/s/ Delores R. Boyd 

DELORES R. BOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 11 Filed 09/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### Frances Anna Pluhar, Appellant, v Town of Southampton et al., Respondents.

[816 NYS2d 176]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cohalan, J.), dated February 9, 2005, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff alleged that she was injured when she slipped and fell on a boat launching ramp located at the end of Bay Avenue in East Quogue.

The defendants met their burden of establishing their prima facie entitlement to summary judgment *(see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,*64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]; *Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). The plaintiff was unable, in deposition testimony, to identify the cause of her fall, which is fatal to her claim *(see Oettinger v Amerada Hess Corp.,*15 AD3d 638, 639 [2005]; *Hartman v Mountain Val. Brew Pub,*301 AD2d 570 [2003]; *Visconti v 110 Huntington Assoc.,*272 AD2d 320, 321 [2000]). The absence of evidence of causation prevents the plaintiff from establishing that the slippery condition was created by the defendants, or that they knew or should have known of its existence for a sufficient time to remedy it *(see Gordon v American Museum of Natural History,*67 NY2d 836, 837 [1986]; *Williams v Hannaford Bros. Co.,*274 AD2d 649, 650 [2000]). Mere speculation as to the cause of a fall is insufficient *(see Visconti v 110 Huntington Assoc., supra*at 321; *Novoni v La Parma Corp.,*278 AD2d 393 [2000]). The presence of a warning sign at the site is, *at*best, evidence of a general awareness of slippery conditions, but is not notice of the specific *976cause of the plaintiffs accident, which remains unidentified *(see Piacquadio v Recine Realty Corp.,*84 NY2d 967, 969 [1994]; *Farrago v Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., Inc.,*17 AD3d 631, 632 [2005]).

In light of the foregoing, we need not consider the plaintiffs remaining contentions. Crane, J.P., Goldstein, Luciano and Dillon, JJ., concur.
# L_2014174EN.01000101.xml

| 13.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 174/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 174/1

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 20 February 2014

on the conclusion of a Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Armenia, of the other part, on a Framework Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Armenia on the general principles for the participation of the Republic of Armenia in Union programmes

(2014/347/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 114, 168, 169 and 172, Article 173(3), and Articles 188 and 192, in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Having regard to the consent of the European Parliament,

Whereas:

| (1) | In accordance with Council Decision 2012/777/EU (1), the Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Armenia, of the other part, on a Framework Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Armenia on the general principles for the participation of the Republic of Armenia in Union programmes (2) (‘the Protocol’) was signed on behalf of the Union on 17 December 2012. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In accordance with Council Decision 2012/777/EU (1), the Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Armenia, of the other part, on a Framework Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Armenia on the general principles for the participation of the Republic of Armenia in Union programmes (2) (‘the Protocol’) was signed on behalf of the Union on 17 December 2012.

| (2) | The Protocol should be approved, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Protocol should be approved,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Armenia, of the other part, on a Framework Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Armenia on the general principles for the participation of the Republic of Armenia in Union programmes is hereby approved on behalf of the Union.

The text of the Protocol is attached to this Decision.

Article 2

The President of the Council shall, on behalf of the Union, give the notification provided for in Article 10 of the Protocol (3).

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 20 February 2014.

For the Council

The President

K. HATZIDAKIS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 340, 13.12.2012, p.26.

1

(2)  See page 3 of this Official Journal.

2

(3)  The date of entry into force of the Protocol will be published in the Official Journal of the European Union by the General Secretariat of the Council.

3

Official Journal of the European Union

---
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2950 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2950

 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain men's footwear valued over 
          $20 a pair with coated or laminated textile fabrics.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 23, 2006

  Mr. Carper introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain men's footwear valued over 
          $20 a pair with coated or laminated textile fabrics.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN MEN'S FOOTWEAR VALUED OVER $20 A PAIR WITH COATED OR 
              LAMINATED TEXTILE FABRICS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.64.06      Men's footwear      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         valued over $20/                                                   31/2009
                         pair designed to
                         be worn over, or
                         in lieu of, other
                         footwear as a
                         protection
                         against water,
                         oil, grease or
                         chemicals or cold
                         or inclement
                         weather where
                         such protection
                         includes
                         protection
                         against water
                         that is imparted
                         by the use of a
                         coated or
                         laminated textile
                         fabric (except
                         footwear with
                         waterproof
                         injection molded
                         bottoms, i.e.
                         comprising a
                         complete outer
                         sole and all or
                         part of the
                         upper) (provided
                         in subheading
                         6402.99.20)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```