C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Jose Luis Cardenas a/k/a Jose L. Cardenas a/k/a Jose Luis Cardenas d/b/a J&S Body Shop v. Betty Wilson & Jeffery Wilson

Appellate case number: 01

- 13

- 00509

- CV

Trial court case number: 2013

- 25987

Trial court: 215th District Court of Harris County

Appellant, Jose Luis Cardenas, has filed a “Motion for a Filing Deadline Extension.” In his motion, Cardenas states that he is “await[ing] the final draft of a court reporter transcript” and “offered to avoid needing a corrected court reporter transcript” by submitting “the digital recording of the proceeding,” and he requests an extension of time to file his brief until after “the final draft of a court reporter trans cript is hopefully successfully obtained.” We deny the motion in part, but grant an extension of time to file the brief and order the brief due 30 days from the

date of this order

. When trial court proceedings are stenographically recorded, the reporter’s record consists of the court reporter’ s transcription of the portions of the proceedings designated by the parties.

See T EX

. R. A PP . P. 34.6(a)( 1). If anything relevant is omitted from the record, any party may by letter direct the court reporter to file a supplemental record containing the omitted item. See

T EX

. R. A PP . P. 34.6(d). If the reporter’s record contains any inaccuracies, the partie s may agree to correct the inaccuracy or, if a dispute arises after the record has been filed in the appellate court and the parties cannot agree to a correction, we may submit the dispute to the trial court for

resolution. See T EX

. R. A PP . P. 34.6(e)(1), ( 3).

The court reporter filed the reporter’s record in this case on July 1, 2013. The record indicates that the proceedings in the trial court were recorded by stenographic method. Therefore, the reporter’s record in this appeal consists of the court re porter’s transcription of the proceedings designated by the parties. 1 See T EX

. R. A PP . P. 34.6(a)(1). In his motion, Cardenas

1 The clerk’s record on file with the Court contains no written request for preparation of the reporter’s record, nor does it contain any designation of the proceedings to be

transcribed or exhibits to be included in the record. See T EX

. R. A PP . P. 34.5(a)( 9) (requiring written request for reporter’s record to be included in clerk’s record); 34.6(b)(1) (requiring appellant to request preparation of reporter’s record in writing andstates that he “offered to avoid needing a corrected” reporter’s record and that he is awaiting the

“final draft” of the reporte r’s record, but he fails to state that the record is incomplete or provide any indication as to what, if anything, is inaccurate in the record or otherwise in need of

correction.

Accordingly, we DENY Cardenas’ motion insofar as it requests an indefinite extension of

time . If the reporter’s record contains an inaccuracy, the parties should notify the Court of any agreement they make to correct the record or Cardenas should notify this Court of any dispute regarding the accuracy of the record, so that we m ay submit the dispute to the trial court for

resolution. See T EX

. R. A PP . P. 34.6(e)(1), (3).

W e grant an extension of time to file a brief, and ORDER Carde nas to file his brief within 30 days. If the brief is not filed within 30 days, Cardenas must move for a further extension of time providing a reasonable explanation of the need fo r an y further extension, or his appeal may be dismissed. See T EX

. R. A PP . P. 10.5(b), 38.6(d), 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ J a ne Bland

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: July 30, 2013

to designate portions of proceedings and exhibits to be included), (b)(2) (req uiring appellant to file copy of written request with trial court clerk).