Congressionally-Directed Template

Preview Report

Grantee: 

Report: Final Report

Final Report Cover Sheet

1. PR/Award No.: 

2. Program:

3. Institutional Name & Address:

4. Project Title:

US Project Director / Contact Person:

Name: 

Title:

Address:

Phone:

Fax:

Email:

5.

6. Performance Reporting Period:

7. Current Budget Period:

Authorized Representative:

Name: 

Title:

Phone:

8.

I. Project Description

Project Title:

Abstract:

The Husson College Occupational Therapy Department will develop the curriculum and

training materials for a certificate program in Assistive Technology (AT). The program's

target audience will be the broad range of health care practitioners who serve clients

who many benefit from AT and AT evaluations. The course will consist of five courses

and when completed will prepare graduates for certification as assistive technology

practitioners by the Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of

North America (RESNA). Four of the five courses will also be available as individual

courses.

Online References:

Subject Categories:

Contacts: Directors Project Director
Phone: 

Fax: 

 Email: 

II. Budget

Project Funds Awarded by FIPSE

(1)Budget (2)Expenditures (3)Estimated Balance

A. Administrative Costs

1. Personnel $0

2. Fringe Benefits $0

3. Travel $0

4. Equipment $0

5. Supplies $0

6. Contractual $0

7. Construction $0

8. Other $0

B. Language Stipends (EC-US, US-Brazil projects only) $0

C. Mobility Stipends (EC-US, US-Brazil projects only) $0

D. Indirect Costs $0

E. Training Stipends and Scholarships $0

Total $0 $0 $0

Project Cost Share Totals Provided by Institution (and Partners if applicable)

(1)Budget (2)Expenditures (3)Estimated Balance

A. Administrative Costs

1. Personnel $0

2. Fringe Benefits $0

3. Travel $0

4. Equipment $0

5. Supplies $0

6. Contractual $0

7. Construction $0

8. Other $0

B. Language Stipends (EC-US, US-Brazil projects only) $0

C. Mobility Stipends (EC-US, US-Brazil projects only) $0

D. Indirect Costs $0

E. Training Stipends and Scholarships $0

Total $0 $0 $0

Budget Narrative:

III. Performance Information
Section 1 - Financial Data

1. Did your organization expend more than $500,000 in Federal funds during the last fiscal year?

( ) Yes ( ) No ( ) N/A

2. When was your most recent OMB Circular A-133 audit? (Leave blank if you have not had one)

Fiscal Year:

3. Were there any findings under your most recent audit?

( ) Yes ( ) No ( ) N/A

4. Have all the findings been resolved through corrective actions?

( ) Yes ( ) No ( ) N/A

5. Does your organization maintain time distribution records for each employee to account for the total

activity for which an employee is compensated from the present grant award?

( ) Yes ( ) No ( ) N/A

6. Does your organization have procedures in place to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of

funds to your organization by a Federal agency and your organization’s expenditures of such funds?

( ) Yes ( ) No ( ) N/A

7. Does your organization have a current negotiated indirect cost rate agreement?

( ) Yes

( ) No

Negotiated indirect cost percentage rate (please do not include the "%" sign): 

Expiration Date:

8. Total funds expended for for-profits? (No commas)

Equipment: $ 

Consultants: $ 
Contractual: $ 

9. Total funds expended for scholarships and stipends? (No commas)

Scholarships: $ Stipends: $ 

Section 2 - Performance Data

1. Has your project director changed during this reporting period?

( ) Yes

( ) No

1b. If you answered "Yes," please provide the name, title, address, telephone, fax, and E-mail address of

the new project director:

2. What is the primary purpose of your Congressionally-directed grant? (Check all that apply)

( ) Purchase of equipment, computers, or technology ( ) Scholarships

( ) Endowment ( ) Conferences

( ) Professional Development ( ) Initiate a new academic program

( ) Provide specialized training to underserved

populations

( ) Curriculum development

( ) Support an academic program ( ) Provide support for research activities

( ) Enhance student services ( ) Provide services to learners with

disabilities

( ) Provide service for veterans ( ) Job Training

( ) Other (Specify)

3. If the purpose of the grant was to support new or ongoing academic programs, in which area(s) of study

would it pertain? (Check all that apply)

( ) Teacher education ( ) Science education

( ) Health care education ( ) Distance learning education

( ) Math education ( ) Humanities or arts education

( ) Civic engagement/leadership education ( ) Vocational or On-the-job training

education

( ) Homeland security ( ) Unspecified curriculum development

( ) Professional education (law, business, journalism,

etc.)

( ) Other (Specify)

( ) N/A

4. Methods used to determine outcomes:

( ) Assessments

( ) Surveys

( ) Observations

( ) Focus Groups

( ) Outcomes accounted for by deliverables (e.g., equipment purchased)

( ) Outcomes consisted of the number of awards made (e.g., scholarships awarded)

( ) Other (Specify)

5. Deliverables as outcomes of the grant: (Check all that apply)
( ) Project-based conferences ( ) Conference materials

( ) Conference presentations/speakers ( ) Course Modules

( ) Project-specific Web-site ( ) Textbooks

( ) Software programs ( ) Books

( ) Video Materials ( ) Guides and handbooks

( ) Printed course materials ( ) Web-based course materials

( ) Technical reports ( ) Journal articles

( ) CD-ROMs/DVDs ( ) Purchased equipment

( ) Other (Specify)

6. List activities which addressed specific project objectives:

7. Identify project outcomes (results of meeting objectives) that have notably impacted the Congressional

purpose of your grant. Number each separately and elaborate.

8. Were any new jobs created as a result of the grant award?

( ) Yes

( ) No

8a. If yes, please estimate the number of jobs:

 

9. Do you intend to apply for any competitive grant funding to continue or expand this project within the

next 12 months?

( ) Yes

( ) No

10. FIPSE administers the Congressionally-directed grants for postsecondary education by reviewing

applications, distributing grant management materials, and providing technical assistance on projectspecific issues. Please rate the overall quality of FIPSE's service to your project:

( ) Superior

( ) Very satisfactory

( ) About average

( ) Somewhat unsatisfactory

( ) Very poor

11. If you rated FIPSE's service as less than "Superior", please tell us how our service may be improved.

IV. Report Files

No files available.

�