alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 906.23 Nominations. The Secretary may select the members of the committee and alternates from nominations which may be made in the following manner: ( a ) A meeting of producers who are members of cooperative marketing organizations and a meeting of independent producers shall be held for each district having both cooperative and independent producer members and alternates to elect nominees for such positions. For all other districts, meetings of all producers shall be held for such purpose. A meeting of handlers representing cooperative marketing organizations and a meeting of independent handlers shall be held in the production area to elect nominees for handler members and alternates. For nominations to the initial committee, the meetings may be sponsored by the United States Department of Agriculture or by any agency or group requested to do so by such Department. For nominations for succeeding members and alternates on the committee, the committee shall hold such meetings or cause them to be held prior to June 15 of each year, after the effective date of this subpart.
( b ) At each such meeting at least one nomination shall be designated for each position as member and alternate.
( c ) Nominations for committee members and alternates following the initial committee shall be supplied to the Secretary not later than July 1 each year.
( d ) In districts having both cooperative and independent producer members, only producers who market their fruit through cooperative marketing organizations may participate in designating nominees for members and alternates representing cooperative producers; and only independent producers may participate in designating nominees for members and alternates representing independent producers. In all other districts, all producers may participate in designating the nominees for producer members and alternates. Only handlers representing cooperative marketing organizations may participate in designating nominees for members and alternates representing cooperative handlers; and only independent handlers may participate in designating nominees for members and alternates representing independent handlers. In the event that a person is engaged in producing fruit in more than one district such person shall elect the district within which he may participate, as aforesaid, in designating nominees.
( e ) Regardless of the amount of fruit handled by a handler or the number of districts in which a person produces fruit, each person is entitled to cast only one vote on behalf of himself, his agents, subsidiaries, affiliates, and representatives in designating nominees for committee members and alternates. An eligible voter's privilege of casting only one vote shall be construed to permit a voter to cast one vote for each position to be filled. Votes must be cast in person at all nomination meetings.
#### § 920.7 Fiscal period.

*Fiscal period* is synonymous with fiscal year and means a 12-month period beginning on August 1 of one year and ending on the last day of July of the following year or such other period as the committee, with the approval of the Secretary, may prescribe.
EX-10.7





 Exhibit 10.7 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO OPEN BANK 

2010 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 

This Amendment No. 1 to the Open Bank 2010 Equity Incentive Plan is dated as of May 23, 2013. 

RECITALS 

1.        The Open Bank 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) was approved
by the Open Bank (the “Bank”) shareholders on August 19, 2010. 

2.        Pursuant to Section 14 of the Plan, the Board of Directors and
shareholders may amend the Plan from time to time. 
 3.        The Board of
Directors, upon recommendation of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee, believes it is in the best interest of the Bank and its shareholders to amend the Plan in accordance with terms of this Amendment No. 1, the form of which has
been approved by the Board of Directors and shareholders. 
 AMENDMENT 

SECTION 1.    Section 4.1 of the Plan is amended and restated in full to read as follows: 

“4.1      Maximum Number of Shares Issuable.
Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4.2, the maximum aggregate number of shares of Stock that may be issued under the Plan shall be 2,500,000 and shall consist of authorized but unissued or reacquired shares of Stock or any
combination thereof. If an outstanding Award for any reason expires or is terminated or canceled without having been exercised or settled in full, or if shares of Stock acquired pursuant to an Award subject to forfeiture or repurchase are forfeited
or repurchased by the Bank at the Participant’s purchase price, the shares of Stock allocable to the terminated portion of such Award or such forfeited or repurchased shares of Stock shall again be available for issuance under the Plan. Shares
of Stock shall not be deemed to have been issued pursuant to the Plan (a) with respect to any portion of an Award that is settled in cash or (b) to the extent such shares are withheld in satisfaction of tax withholding obligations pursuant
to Section 13. If the exercise price of an Option is paid by tender to the Bank, or attestation to the ownership, of shares of Stock owned by the Participant, the number of shares available for issuance under the Plan shall be reduced by the
net number of shares for which the Option is exercised.” 
 SECTION 2.    This Amendment shall take
effect as of June 20, 2013. Through June 19, 2013 the terms of the Plan shall be applied without giving effect to this Amendment, subject to approval of the Amendment by the Board of Directors and shareholders. 

SECTION 3.    Except as provided in this Amendment No. 1, the provisions, terms and conditions of the
Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 












 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Bank has caused this Amendment No. 1 to the
Plan to be duly executed on its behalf by a duly authorized officer of the Bank effective as of the date first written above. 
  

			
	 OPEN BANK

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Min J.
Kim



 
			
		
	 Name:
	 	 Min J. Kim





			
		
	 Title:
	 	President and Chief Executive Officer



  
 2
405.502 Authority.

(a) The authority vested in the agency head to authorize publication of paid advertisements in

newspapers (44 U.S.C. 3702) is delegated, with power of redelegation, to HCA's. HCA redelegation

of this authority shall be in writing.

(b) Policies and procedures regarding prior authorization required for media other than newspapers

are contained in USDA Departmental Regulations 1400 series.

Parent topic: Subpart 405.5 - Paid Advertisements
§ 927.20 Establishment and membership. There are hereby established two committees to administer the terms and provisions of this subpart as specifically provided in §§ 927.20 through 927.35: ( a ) A Fresh Pear Committee, consisting of 13 individual persons as its members is established to administer order provisions relating to the handling of pears for the fresh market. Six members of the Fresh Pear Committee shall be growers, six members shall be handlers, and one member shall represent the public. For each member there shall be two alternates, designated as the “first alternate” and the “second alternate,” respectively. Each district shall be represented by one grower member and one handler member, except that the Mid-Columbia District and the Wenatchee District shall be represented by two grower members and two handler members.
( b ) A Processed Pear Committee consisting of 10 members is established to administer order provisions relating to the handling of pears for processing. Three members of the Processed Pear Committee shall be growers, three members shall be handlers, three members shall be processors, and one member shall represent the public. For each member there shall be two alternates, designated as the “first alternate” and the “second alternate,” respectively. District 1, the State of Washington, shall be represented by two grower members, two handler members and two processor members. District 2, the State of Oregon, shall be represented by one grower member, one handler member and one processor member.
( c ) The Secretary, upon recommendation of the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee may reapportion members among districts, may change the number of members and alternates, and may change the composition by changing the ratio of members, including their alternates. In recommending any such changes, the following shall be considered: ( 1 ) Shifts in pear acreage within districts and within the production area during recent years;
( 2 ) The importance of new pear production in its relation to existing districts;
( 3 ) The equitable relationship between membership and districts;
( 4 ) Economies to result for growers in promoting efficient administration due to redistricting or reapportionment of members within districts; and
( 5 ) Other relevant factors.
446.370 Inspection and acceptance.       The Contracting Officer shall insert the clause at 452.246-70, Inspection and Acceptance, in contracts where inspection and acceptance will be performed at the same location. The clause with its Alternate I is for use when inspection and acceptance will be performed at different locations.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 446.3 - Contract Clauses
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Centenary International
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Hector A. Patron Costas, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Hector A. Patron Costas
---------------------------
Hector A. Patron Costas
Chief Financial Officer
March 2, 1006

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
     other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
     signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
     written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
     the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
     staff upon request. The foregoing certifications are accompanying the
     Company's Form 10-QSB solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
     Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title
     18, United States Code) and are not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB
     or as a separate disclosure document.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Don McCaffety v. Angela Blanchard

Appellate case number: 01-15-01077-CV

Trial court case number: 2014-54153

Trial court: 281st District Court of Harris County

We dismissed this appeal for want of prosecution on January 19, 2017. 

Appellant filed a motion to reinstate the appeal on January 30, 2017, contending he had 

requested a pro bono lawyer through the Pro Bono Program conducted in conjunction with the 

State Bar of Texas Appellate Section Pro Bono Committee and the local bar association. 

Construing the motion to reinstate as a motion for rehearing, we grant the motion, withdraw 

our opinion and judgment of January 19, 2017, and reinstate the appeal on the active docket. 

This is an appeal from a final summary judgment resolving claims of fraud, breach of 

contract, and related civil claims. In this circumstance, this court has no authority to appoint a pro 

bono lawyer for appellant, and there is no guarantee that the Pro Bono Program will find a pro 

bono lawyer to accept the case. 

Nearly a year has passed since appellant’s brief was originally due. Appellant’s brief is 

now due on or before March 30, 2017. No further extensions will be granted on the basis of

seeking a pro bono lawyer. If an attorney files a notice of appearance on behalf of appellant on or 

before March 30, 2017, the court will entertain a motion for a short extension of additional time to 

file a brief. Otherwise, no further extensions will be granted absent a showing of good cause other 

than the failure to secure pro bono representation.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Michael Massengale

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: March 2, 2017
December	 22,	2015

Docket	Operations,	M-30

U.	S.	Department	of	Transportation

1200	New	Jersey	Ave.	SE.	

Room	W12-140,	West	Building	Ground	Floor

Washington	DC	20590-0001

Re: Amendment	to	Docket	No.	FAA-2015-7163

Dear	Sir	or	Madam;

Vantage	Aerial	Media	is requesting	an	amendment	to	its	petition	for	exemption	

(Docket	No.	FAA-2015-7163,	dated	September	30,	2015)	to	allow	commercial	

operation	of	small	unmanned	aerial	systems	for	the	purpose	of	inspection,	

monitoring,	mapping	and	photographing	equipment	and	engineering	studies.	

Vantage	Aerial	Media hereby	requests	an	amendment to its	petition	to include	the	

following additional	sUAS:

 DJI	Phantom	2	

 DJI	Phantom	2	Vision

 DJI	Phantom	2	Vision+

 DJI	Phantom	3

 DJI	Phantom	3	Professional

 DJI	Phantom	3	Advanced

 DJI	S1000+

 DJI	S900

 DJI	Inspire	1

 DJI	Matrice	100	

 SenseFly	eBee	RTK

 SenseFly	eBee	Ag

 SenseFly	eXom

 AgEagle	Aerial	Systems	AgEagle

 Lumenier	QAV250

 Lumenier	QAV540G

This	amendment	request	is	based	on	information	provided	in	this	petition	and	the	

User	Manuals	for	Vantage	Aerial	Media’s DJI	(Phantom	2,	Phantom	2	Vision,	

Phantom	2	Vision+,	Phantom	3,	Phantom	3	Advanced,	Phantom	3	Professional,	

S1000+,	S900,	Inspire	1,	Matrice	100),	AgEagle	Aerial	Systems	(AgEagle),	senseFly	

(eBee	Ag,	eBee	RTK,	eXom),	and	Lumenier	(QAV250	and	QAV540G) sUAS	

(collectively,	the	“Manuals”),	copies	of	which	are	already	on	file	with	the	FAA.		See,	

e.g.,	Grant	of	Exemption 11398	(DJI	Phantom	2,	DJI	Phantom	2	Vision+,	DJI	Inspire	
1),	Exemption	11373A	(DJI	Phantom	2	Vision,	SenseFly	eXom),	Exemption	11956	

(SenseFly	eBee	RTK),	Exemption	11956	(SenseFly	eBee	Ag),	Exemption	12378A	(DJI	

Matrice	100,	DJI	Phantom	3),	Exemption	12700	(DJI	Phantom	3	Professional),	

Exemption	12706	(DJI	Phantom	2,	DJI	Phantom	2	Vision+,	DJI	Phantom	3	Advanced,	

DJI	Phantom	3	Professional,	DJI	S900,	DJI	Inspire	1),	Exemption	12698	(DJI	Phantom	

3,	DJI	Phantom	2,	DJI	Inspire	1,	DJI	S1000+),	Exemption	12039	(AgEagle),	

Exemption	11062A (Lumenier).

The	findings,	rationale	and	conclusions	contained	in	the	petition	for	exemption	

(Docket	No.	FAA-2015-7163,	dated	September	30,	2015) apply	without	modification	

to	this	application	to	include	the	additional	sUAS.		All	operations	of	the	additional	

sUAS	will	be	in	full	compliance	with	the	terms	of	the	Exemption and	the	Manuals.		

The	added	sUAS	are comparable	in	type,	size,	weight,	speed	and	operating	

capabilities	to	those	in	the	original	petition.

Please	contact	the	undersigned	should	you	have	any	questions	concerning	this	

request	for	an	amendment.

Thank	you	for	your	consideration

Ryan	Baker,	Director	of	sUAS	Flight	Operations

Vantage	Aerial	Media
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Yellowcake Mining Inc.
for the year ended July 31, 2008, the undersigned, Lisa Lopomo, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to her knowledge:

     1.   the Form 10-K/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Yellowcake Mining Inc.

March 15, 2010


/s/ Lisa Lopomo
--------------------------------------------
Lisa Lopomo
President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director
Principal Executive Officer, Principal
Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Yellowcake Mining Inc. and will be retained by Yellowcake Mining
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              7
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                   JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                     JUN-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  84,979,891
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            0
<EQUITIES>                               221,619
<MORTGAGE>                                     0
<REAL-ESTATE>                          3,878,066
<TOTAL-INVEST>                       103,093,404
<CASH>                                 4,356,310
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                       862,961
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                 3,713,403
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       150,728,084
<POLICY-LOSSES>                      114,874,624
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                   17,498,343
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                        4,900,000
<COMMON>                                 658,902
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         150,728,084
<PREMIUMS>                            11,854,848
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                    2,733,568
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                     2,267,824
<OTHER-INCOME>                           653,414
<BENEFITS>                            28,490,198
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>            3,899,484
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                   2,172,878
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       (9,677,791)
<INCOME-TAX>                            (645,300)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   (9,032,491)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                          (9,032,491)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              (1.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (1.51)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        0
        


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA OF

NORTHERN DIVISION

RALPH BROWN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-642-MEF

)

CHAMPION ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

O R D E R

The Court has been notified by the parties that the dispute in the above-referenced

case has been resolved. Accordingly, it is hereby 

ORDERED that the parties file a joint stipulation of dismissal on or before August

29, 2008.

DONE this the 4th day of August, 2008.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 54 Filed 08/04/2008 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

ROBERT BLANKENSHIP, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NUMBER

) 2:06-cv-0648-MHT

PFIZER, INC., BOEHRINGER )

INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, )

INC., DAVID ROHLING, KMART OF )

MICHIGAN, INC., ART REDDING, )

KELLI STRANGE, )

)

Defendants. )

JOINDER IN AND ADOPTION OF BRIEF

Comes now David Rohling, a defendant in the above-styled cause, and joins in and

adopts, in support of his Motion to Dismiss, the Brief in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to

Remand filed on August 21, 2006, by defendant Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

/s/Maibeth J. Porter

MAIBETH J. PORTER

ALVIN L. (“PECK”) FOX

EDWARD A. (“TED”) HOSP

MARCIE P. BRASWELL

Attorneys for Defendant David Rohling.

OF COUNSEL:

MAYNARD, COOPER & GALE, P.C.

Attorneys at Law

Suite 2400 AmSouth/Harbert Plaza

1901 Sixth Avenue, North

Birmingham, Alabama 35203-2602

Telephone: (205) 254-1000

Telecopier: (205) 254-1999

Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 27 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 1 of 2
01377851.1

2

Ms. Beth S. Rose

Mr. Stuart M. Feinblatt

Ms. Jennifer Ewers Hurley

SILLS CUMMIS EPSTEIN & GROSS, P.C.

One Riverfront Plaza

Newark, N.J. 07102

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing has been served upon the following counsel

of record to this proceeding by United States Mail, properly addressed and postage prepaid, or as

indicated below, this 21st day of August, 2006:

Mr. J. Gregory Allen

Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles, P.C.

P. O. Box 4160

Montgomery, AL 36103-4160

Mr. L. Shane Seaborn

Penn & Seaborn, LLC

P. O. Box 688

Clayton, AL 36016-0688

Mr. F.M. “Tripp” Haston, III

Andrew B. Johnson

Bradley Arant Rose & White LLP

One Federal Place

1819 5

th Ave. North

Birmingham, AL 35203

Mr. Philip F. Hutcheson

Boardman, Carr, Weed & Hutcheson, P.C.

400 Boardman Dr.

Chelsea, AL 35043-8211

/s/Maibeth J. Porter

OF COUNSEL

Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 27 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Venture Lending & Leasing V, Inc. (the "Fund") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Martin D. Eng, Chief Financial Officer of the Fund, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Fund.





/S/ Martin D. Eng





Martin D. Eng


Chief Financial Officer


March 21, 2014
Opinion issued March 3, 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals

For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01

- 15

- 00731

- CV

——————————— IN RE ARTIS CHARLES HARRELL , Relator

O riginal Proceeding o n Petition fo r Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Artis Charles Harrell, an inmate proceeding pro se, has filed a petition

for writ of mandamus, c ontending that respondent, the Honorable Patricia J.

Kerrigan, abused her discretion by not ruling on pending motions within a

reasonable period of time

. 1

1 The underlying proceeding i s Artis Charles Harrell v. Jerome Godinich, Jr. , No. 20 14

- 6 3129 , in the 19 0 th District Court of Harris County, the Honorable Patricia J. Kerrigan presiding.2

We deny the petition.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Massengale, and Huddle.
160 So.2d 224

#### STATE of Louisiana, through the DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS, v. GIFFORD-HILL & COMPANY, Inc.

No. 47044.

Feb. 7, 1964.

In re: State of Louisiana, through the ^Department of Highways, applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Webster. 158 So .2d 448.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal the result is correct.

HAWTHORNE and McCALEB, JJ., are of the view that a writ should be granted to review the award of severance damages to tract 2-255 acres.