alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

 ______________________________

JEREMIAH W. GREEN *

Plaintiff, *

 v. * 2:06-CV-667-WKW

 

AJA ROBERTS *

Defendant. *

 ______________________________

ORDER ON MOTION

Upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time, and for good cause,

it is ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. No. 29) is GRANTED; and

2. Plaintiff is GRANTED an extension from December 7, 2006 to January 4, 2007

to file a response to Defendant's written report, as supplemented. 

Done, this 14th day of December 2006.

 /s/Wallace Capel, Jr. 

WALLACE CAPEL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 35 Filed 12/14/2006 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 10.27


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO 


CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment No.1
to Contribution Agreement (this “Amendment”), effective as of the date of last signature below, hereby amends that
certain Contribution Agreement, dated December 31, 2016 (the “Agreement”), between Savsu Technologies, LLC,
(“Savsu”), biologistix CCM, LLC, (“JV”) and BioLife Solutions, Inc. (“Company”).
Terms not defined herein have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement.


 


The Parties entered
into the Agreement pursuant to which certain changes in equity ownership were detailed in Section 1.8. The Parties now desire to
amend the Agreement as follows:


 


		1.	Section 1.8 of the Agreement, “BLS Post-Closing Transfer of Equity to Savsu” shall be deleted and replaced with
the following:



 


BLS Post-Closing Transfer of Equity to Savsu:
BLS agrees that effective 12/31/17, BLS’s equity ownership will be reduced to 35% from the initial 45%. BLS 35% equity stake
will be subject to dilution from any new capital contributions beginning on January 1, 2017.


 


This Amendment has been executed by the parties on the dates
written below.


 


	biologistex CCM, LLC	 	BIOLIFE SOLUTIONS, INC.
	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	 	 	By:	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Name:	 	 	Name:	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Title:	 	 	Title:	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Date:	 	 	Date:	 
	 	 	 	 	 


 


Savsu Technologies, LLC


 


	By:	 	 
	 	 	 
	Name:	 	 
	 	 	 
	Title:	 	 
	 	 	 
	Date:
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-15 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 1 of 16
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-15 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 2 of 16
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-15 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 3 of 16
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-15 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 4 of 16
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-15 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 5 of 16
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-15 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 6 of 16
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-15 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 7 of 16
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-15 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 8 of 16
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-15 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 9 of 16
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-15 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 10 of 16
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-15 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 11 of 16
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-15 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 12 of 16
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-15 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 13 of 16
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-15 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 14 of 16
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-15 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 15 of 16
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 73-15 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 16 of 16
Case 2:06-cv-00639-WKW-TFM Document 8 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00639-WKW-TFM Document 8 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 2 of 2
# Subpart 405.3 - Synopses of Contract Awards

**Parent topic:**PART 405 - PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONS

## 405.303 Announcement of contract awards.

Contracting officers shall make information available on any contract award with an estimated total value over $1 million (including options) to their agency congressional liaison office in sufficient time for the agency to announce it by 5:00 p.m. Washington, DC time on the day of award. The agency congressional liaison office shall, concurrent with the public announcement, provide the award announcement information to the USDA Congressional Relations Office.
§ 764.54 Preferences when there is limited funding. ( a ) *First priority.* When there is a shortage of loan funds, approved applications will be funded in the order of the date the application was received, whether or not complete.
( b ) *Secondary priorities.* If two or more applications were received on the same date, the Agency will give preference to: ( 1 ) First, an applicant who is a veteran of any war;
( 2 ) Second, an applicant who is not a veteran, but: ( i ) Has a dependent family;
( ii ) Is able to make a down payment; or
( iii ) Owns livestock and farm implements necessary to farm successfully.
( 3 ) Third, to other eligible applicants.
[72 FR 63298, Nov. 8, 2007, as amended at 86 FR 43391, Aug. 9, 2021]
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JUAN EMANUEL ZAMUDIO,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-844

[May 20, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. 

Lucie County; Charles A. Schwab, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

562018CF001966A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Ian Seldin, Assistant Public 

Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeanine 

Germanowicz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for 

appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, GERBER, and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 49 (Tuesday, March 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 14784]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6026]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9645-7]

Notice of Proposed Administrative Settlement Pursuant to the 
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice; request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 122 (i) of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended 
(``CERCLA''), 42 U.S.C. 9622(i), notice is hereby given of a proposed 
administrative settlement concerning the Arkansas Waste to Energy 
Superfund Site, located in Osceola, Mississippi County, Arkansas.
    The settlement requires the six (6) settling parties to pay a total 
of $118,503.00 as payment of response costs to the Hazardous Substances 
Superfund, as well as remove the remaining 708 drums still onsite. The 
settlement includes a covenant not to sue pursuant to Section 106 and 
107 of CERCLA, 42, U.S.C. 9606 and 9607.
    For thirty (30) days following the date of publication of this 
notice, the Agency will receive written comments relating to this 
notice and will receive written comments relating to the settlement. 
The Agency will consider all comments received and may modify or 
withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments received disclose 
facts or considerations which indicate that the settlement is 
inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. The Agency's response to any 
comments received will be available for public inspection at 1445 Ross 
Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before April 12, 2012.

ADDRESSES: The proposed settlement and additional background 
information relating to the settlement are available for public 
inspection at 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. A copy of the 
proposed settlement may be obtained from Cynthia Brown at, 1445 Ross 
Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 or by calling (214) 665-7480. Comments 
should reference the Arkansas Waste to Energy Superfund Site, located 
in Osceola, Mississippi County, Arkansas, and EPA Docket Number 06-11-
08, and should be addressed to Cynthia Brown at the address listed 
above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cynthia Brown 1445 Ross Avenue, 
Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 or call (214) 665-7480.

    Dated: February 29, 2012.
Al Armendariz,
Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2012-6026 Filed 3-12-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3361 

To suspend temporarily the duty on titanium dioxide anatase. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 5, 2006 

Mr. FRIST (for himself and Mr. ALEXANDER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on titanium dioxide anatase. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TITANIUM DIOXIDE ANATASE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.28.23 Titanium dioxide (anatase type) (CAS 

No. 1317–70–0) (provided for in subheading 2823.00.00) ................................ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 this section shall apply with respect to goods entered, or 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 3361 IS 

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

ORIN TURNER

,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff Below,

Appellee. §

§

§ No. 428, 2019

§

§ Court Below

— Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§

§ Cr. ID No. 0609012387A(K)

§

§

§

Submitted: May 19 , 2020

Decided: June 18 , 2020

Before VA LIHURA

, VA UGHN

, and TRAYNOR

, Justices.

O R D E R

After careful consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the State’s motion

to affirm, and the record on appeal, w e conclude that the judgment below should be

affirm ed on the basis of th e Superior Court’s order , dated August 9, 2019, denying

the appellant’s second motion for postconviction relief as procedurally barred

, and

the Superior Court’s order, dated October 2, 2 019

, denying the appellant’s motion

for reconsideration of the August 9, 2019 order

. As the Superior Court observed,

t he appellant has not pleaded any circumstances under Rule 61(d)(2)(i) or (d)(2)(ii)2

that overcome the procedural bars set forth in Rule 61

, 1 nor does he claim that the

Superior Court lacked jurisdiction. 2

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to affirm is

GRANTED and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr.

Justice

1 D EL

. S UPER

. C T

. C RIM

. R. 61(i).

2 Id. R. 61(i)(5).
1336.609-1 Design within funding limitations.       The designee authorized to make the determination described at FAR 36.609-1(c)(1) to enable exclusion of the clause at FAR 52.236-22 from the contract is set forth in CAM 1301.70.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1336.6 - Architect-Engineer Services
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

CLARENCE WATERS, #132116, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO.2:06-CV-650-MEF

)

KENNETH L. JONES, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

ORDER

Upon review of the response filed by the petitioner on February 28, 2008, and for good

cause, it is 

ORDERED that on or before March 7, 2008 the respondents shall file a supplement to their

most recent answer which addresses the merits of the petitioner's claim that the trial court imposed

an unauthorized sentence because it improperly relied on the presentence investigation report as

proof of his prior felony convictions for purposes of enhancing his sentence under the Habitual

Felony Offender Act. In support of this response, the respondents shall file relevant state court

records which indicate the proof utilized by the State to establish petitioner's prior felony

convictions at his May 12, 2005 sentencing.

Done this 28th day of February, 2008.

 /s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00650-MEF-SRW Document 31 Filed 02/28/2008 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1/32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Mariposa Resources, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nanuk Warman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 23rd day of September, 2010.  /s/ Nanuk Warman _____ Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
PUBLIC LAW 107–309—DEC. 2, 2002 116 STAT. 2449

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3988:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 107–571 (Comm. on the Judiciary).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 148 (2002):

July 15, considered and passed House.

Nov. 14, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 107–309

107th Congress

An Act

To amend title 36, United States Code, to clarify the requirements for eligibility

in the American Legion.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBILITY IN

THE AMERICAN LEGION.

Section 21703(2) of title 36, United States Code, is amended

by inserting ‘‘during or’’ after ‘‘continues to serve honorably’’.

Approved December 2, 2002.

Dec. 2, 2002

[H.R. 3988]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3303 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3303

To suspend temporarily the duty on food slicers and shredders with top-
              mounted motors and replaceable mixing bowls.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 26, 2006

   Mr. Allen introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on food slicers and shredders with top-
              mounted motors and replaceable mixing bowls.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FOOD SLICERS AND SHREDDERS WITH TOP-MOUNTED MOTORS AND 
              REPLACEABLE MIXING BOWLS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.85.14        Food slicers and        Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           shredders with top-                                               31/2009          ''
                           mounted motors and                                                                  .
                           replaceable mixing
                           bowls (provided for
                           in subheading
                           8509.40.00)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 982
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 61 FR 17559, Apr. 22, 1996.

§ 982.62 Accounting. ( a ) *Operating reserve.* The Board with the approval of the Secretary may establish and maintain an operating monetary reserve in an amount not to exceed approximately one marketing year's operational expenses or such lower limits as the Board with the approval of the Secretary may establish.
( b ) *Refunds.* At the end of a marketing year funds in excess of the marketing year's expenses and reserve requirements shall be refunded to handlers from whom collected and each handler's share of such excess funds shall be the amount of assessments the handler paid in excess of the handler's pro rata share of expenses of the Board. However, excess funds may be maintained and used by the Board until December 1 following the end of any such marketing year: *Provided,* That the Board shall refund to each handler upon request, or credit to the handler's account with the Board, the handler's share of such excess prior to January 1.
( c ) *Termination.* Upon termination of this subpart any money remaining unexpended in possession of the Board shall be distributed in such manner as the Secretary may direct: *Provided,* That to the extent practical, such funds shall be returned pro rata to the persons from whom such funds were collected.
[24 FR 6185, Aug. 1, 1959, as amended at 46 FR 26040, May 11, 1981]
**CERTIFICATIONS

I, George W. Hamlin, IV, certify that: 
1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Canandaigua National Corporation and Subsidiaries;    
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  
4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  
(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosures controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  
(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  
(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 
5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  
(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  
(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

November 7, 2003 
/s/ George W. Hamlin, IV
Date 
George W. Hamlin, IV, President and  
Principal Executive Officer

 **
# SUBPART 29.1 — GENERAL

**Parent topic:**PART 29 ––TAXES

## 29.101 Resolving tax problems.

(a)(S-90) Contracting officers should request assistance from legal counsel and the PL842 Cost and Pricing Branch. PL842 can provide assistance on applicability and reasonableness prior to negotiations.
Editorial Note on Part 982
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 61 FR 17559, Apr. 22, 1996.

§ 982.30 Establishment and membership. ( a ) There is hereby established a Hazelnut Marketing Board consisting of 10 members, each of whom shall have an alternate member, to administer the terms and provisions of this part. Each member and alternate shall meet the same eligibility qualifications. The 10 member positions shall be allocated as follows:
( b ) Four of the members shall represent handlers, as follows: ( 1 ) One member shall be nominated by the handler who handled the largest volume of hazelnuts during the two marketing years preceding the marketing year in which nominations are made;
( 2 ) One member shall be nominated by the handler who handled the second largest volume of hazelnuts during the two marketing years preceding the marketing year in which nominations are made;
( 3 ) One member shall be nominated by the handler who handled the third largest volume of hazelnuts during the two marketing years preceding the marketing year in which nominations are made;
( 4 ) The fourth handler member shall be nominated by and represent all other handlers.
( c ) Five members shall represent growers and shall be nominated for the districts designated in or established pursuant to § 982.31. One grower member shall represent each of the five grower districts unless changes are made pursuant to § 982.31(b).
( d ) One member shall be a public member who is neither a grower nor a handler.
( e ) The Secretary, or the Board with the approval of the Secretary, may revise the handler representation on the Board if the Board ceases to be representative of the industry.
[51 FR 29546, Aug. 19, 1986, as amended at 61 FR 17559, Apr. 22, 1996]
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3284 

To suspend temporarily the duty on pressure sensitive film with adhesive 

based on styrene-ethylene-butylene copolymer. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 26, 2006 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on pressure sensitive film 

with adhesive based on styrene-ethylene-butylene copolymer. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PRESSURE SENSITIVE FILM WITH ADHESIVE 

4 BASED ON STYRENE-ETHYLENE-BUTYLENE 

5 COPOLYMER. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•S 3284 IS 

‘‘ 9902.39.19 Pressure sensitive adhesive film sheet; 

thickness less than 100 micrometers with 

substrate of polypropylene (CAS No. 

9010–79–1) and adhesive based on styrene-ethylene-butylene copolymer (CAS 

No. 9003–55–8) (provided for in subheading 3919.90.50) ................................ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS