alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000760327
<NAME> LOGIN COUNTY BANCSHARES
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           4,844
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 4,475
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     18,842
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           7,061
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             7,074
<LOANS>                                         77,259
<ALLOWANCE>                                        581
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 115,362
<DEPOSITS>                                     102,643
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                643
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,274
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,802
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 115,362
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,204
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  698
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   230
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 4,132
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,693
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,693
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,439
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       15
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   5
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,592
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,421
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,421
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       946
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.02
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   4,532
<LOANS-NON>                                        554
<LOANS-PAST>                                       352
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   681
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      115
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  581
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               581
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 94

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 94 appear at 61 FR 51352, Oct. 2 1996.

#### § 94.300 General.

Laboratory services of processed poultry products are conducted to derive their analytical attributes used to determine the compliance of the product with applicable specifications.
#### § 61.37 License may be suspended.

The Director may, without a hearing, suspend or revoke the license issued to a licensed sampler upon written request and a satisfactory statement of reasons therefor submitted by such licensed sampler. Pending final action by the Secretary, the Director may, whenever he deems such action necessary, suspend the license of any licensed sampler by giving notice of such suspension to the licensee, accompanied by a statement of the reasons therefor. Within 10 days after the receipt of the aforesaid notice and statement of reasons by such licensee, he may file an appeal, in writing, with the Secretary, supported by any argument or evidence that he may wish to offer as to why his license should not be suspended or revoked. After the expiration of the aforesaid 10-day period and consideration of such argument and evidence, the Secretary will take such action as he deems appropriate with respect to such suspension or revocation. When no appeal is filed within the prescribed 10 days, the license shall be automatically revoked.
----

|                          |   |   |   |                                                                                                                       |
|-------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:      September 12, 2008 |   |   |   |  /s/      Thomas R. BurtonThomas      R. BurtonPresident,      Chief Executive Officer                                |
|                          |   |   |   |                                                                                                                       |
|                          |   |   |   |                                                                                                                       |
| Date:      September 12, 2008 |   |   |   |  /s/      Robert A. MasseyRobert      A. MasseySenior      Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and      Treasurer |
|                          |   |   |   |                                                                                                                       |

----
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3223 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain capers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. MENENDEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain capers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN CAPERS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.10.26 Capers, prepared or preserved by vinegar other than 

such goods in immediate 

containers each holding 3.4 

kg or less (provided for in 

subheading 2001.90.20) ...... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 3223 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 1631** 

JENNIFER D. MARSHALL; DAVID C. MARSHALL , Plaintiffs

– Appellants ,

v. ETHICON, INCORPORATED; JOHNSON & JOHNSON , Defendants

– Appellees , and
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. , Defendant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia , at Charleston

. Joseph R. Goodwin , District Judge. ( 2:12

- cv - 02809; 2:12

- md

- 02327 )

Submitted : November 14, 2016 Decided: November 21, 2016

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Tracy W. Houck, Ron Riggle, HOUCK & RIGGLE, LLC, Ruston, Louisiana, for Appellants. David B. Thomas, Daniel R. Higginbotham, THOMAS COMBS & SPANN, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia; Christy Jones, John C. Henegan, Sr., Susana Moore Moldoveanu, BUTLER SNOW LLP, Ridgeland, Mississippi, for2 Appe llees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:
Jennifer D. and David C. Marshall appeal the district

court ’ s order s dismissing this action for failure to effect timely service of process and denying their motion for
reconsideration . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Marshall v. Ethicon, Inc. , Nos. 2:12

- cv 02809, 2:12

- md

- 92327 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 2 6 & May 27, 2016) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5 the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 18, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-10188

Summary Calendar

 

APPARAJAN GANESAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

SHIRLEY JAMES, Administrative Tech II; 

MICHAEL UPSHAW, Warden; JANIE COCKRELL, 

DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL 

JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

Defendants-Appellees.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:02-CV-129

 

Before GARWOOD, DEMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Apparajan Ganesan, Texas prisoner # 904088, by his February

18, 2003, notice of appeal seeks to appeal the dismissal without

prejudice for failure to prosecute of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit

against various prison officials for retaliation and mail
**Appellant is reminded that if the district court denies his

motion to reinstate he should file in the district court a new

notice of appeal (directed to such denial) within 30 days from the

date of such denial if he wishes to complain on appeal of such

denial. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4)(B)(ii). 

2

censorship. On February 4, 2003, Ganesan filed in the district

court a motion to reinstate, explaining why he had not sooner filed

the copies of documents as required by the December 20, 2002,

order, which failure was apparently the basis of the January 21,

2003, dismissal. The February 4, 2003, motion was filed within ten

days (computed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a)) of the January 21, 2003,

dismissal and was in substance a timely Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e)

motion. Bann v. Ingram Micro Inc., 108 F.3d 625, 626 (5th Cir.

1997). The district court has never ruled on the February 4, 2003,

motion. Accordingly, the notice of appeal has not become

effective, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4)(B)(i), and the appeal is

therefore DISMISSED.** Simmons v. Reliance Standard Life Ins. Co.,

310 F.3d 865, 868-70 (5th Cir. 2002).

Appeal DISMISSED as premature.
Mr. Robert Finamore 

Division Chief 

Foreign Air Carrier Licensing Division 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Applications of Air Baltic Corporation A/S and Uzbekistan Airways 

(Dockets DOT-OST-2015-0065 and DOT-OST-2015-0067) 

Dear Mr. Finamore: 

We have polled each of the U.S. air carrier representatives listed on the attached service 

list regarding the above-referenced applications of Air Baltic Corporation A/S and Uzbekistan 

Airways. All of the carrier representatives have indicated that they have no objection to the 

Department's grant of either Air Baltic's requested foreign air carrier permit and exemption 

authority or Uzbekistan Airways' request for a statement of authorization to code-share with Air 

Baltic. The applicants respectfully request that the Department expeditiously approve their 

pending applications. 

Sincerely, 

COZEN O'CONNOR 

By: David Heffernan 

Counsel for 

Air Baltic Corporation A/S and 

Uzbekistan Airways 

1627 I Street, NW Suite 11 00 Washington, D.C. 20006 

202.912.4800 800.540.1355 202.861.1905 Fax cozen.com 
ABX Air and 

Air Transport Int'l: 

American Airlines: 

Amerijet Int'l: 

Atlas Air: 

Delta Air Lines: 

Federal Express: 

Kalitta Air: 

Polar Air Cargo: 

Southern Air: 

United Airlines: 

UPS: 

DATED: March 27,201 5 

LEGAL\2250447611 

rsilverberg@sgbdc.com 

howard.kass@aa.com 

robert. wirick@aa.com 

abigail.donovan@aa.com 

jcanny@amerijet.com 

rpommer@atlasair.com 

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com 

chris. walker@del ta. com 

nssparks@fedex.com 

cefelts@fedex.com 

psanderlin@kalittaair.com 

kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com 

agoerlich@ggh-airlaw.com 

gmurphy@crowell.com 

dan. weiss@united.com 

steve.morrissey@united.com 

anita.mosner@hklaw.com 

j ennifer.nowak@hklaw.com 

Kenneth C. Hines
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          19,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           2,557
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                18,300
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     60,527
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        507,946
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,718
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 642,494
<DEPOSITS>                                     525,593
<SHORT-TERM>                                    35,659
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              5,131
<LONG-TERM>                                     14,883
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,577
<OTHER-SE>                                      56,651
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 642,494
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 10,187
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  982
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   239
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                11,408
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,235
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,835
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,573
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      300
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  29
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,257
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,483
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,611
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,611
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.35
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.81
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,015
<LOANS-PAST>                                        73
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   144
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    946
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,587
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      196
<RECOVERIES>                                        27
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,718
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,718
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
5109.506 Procedures.

(d)(3) The head of the contracting activity gives the approval or other direction as described in FAR

9.506(d)(3). See Appendix GG for further delegation.

Parent topic: Subpart 5109.5 - Organizational and Consultant Conflicts of Interests
# ELECTRONIC RECORD COA# 13-13-00190-CR OFFENSE: 19.02 ALBERT RODRIGUEZ MEDELLIN v. 

# STYLE: thestateoftexas COUNTY: Comal 

# H%H-t$

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED TRIAL COURT: 207th District Court 

### DATE: 4/2/15 Publish: NO TC CASE #: CR-2011-196



## IN THE COURTOF CRIMINALAPPEALS ALBERT RODRIGUEZ MEDELLIN v. STYLE: THE STATE OF TEXAS 

# cca#: *rQHm/5 AP?ELL/\!\17-'>S, Petition CCA DisDOsition: FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: DATE: 

# TgftSzD JUDGE: 

# DATE: W/M/MX 

# JUDGE: j^MUMMLrC SIGNED: PC: PUBLISH: DNP: MOTION FOR REHEARING IN CCA IS:

> JUDGE: 

### ELECTRONIC RECORD
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3152 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3152

To suspend temporarily the duty on 120-piece drill and driver bit sets 
                            for woodworking.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

 Mr. Chambliss introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on 120-piece drill and driver bit sets 
                            for woodworking.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 120-PIECE DRILL AND DRIVER BIT SETS FOR WOODWORKING.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.82.07        120-piece drill and     Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           driver bit sets for                                               31/2009          ''
                           woodworking (provided                                                               .
                           for in subheading
                           8207.90.30)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
701.707 Signatory authority.

Unless otherwise specified in the FAR or AIDAR section under which the D&F is issued, the

contracting officer is the signing official.

Parent topic: Subpart 701.7—Determinations and Findings
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3109 

To suspend temporarily the duty on contoured padded infant potty seats. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. BROWNBACK introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on contoured padded infant 

potty seats. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONTOURED PADDED INFANT POTTY SEATS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.39.24 Contoured padded infant potty seats 

(provided for in subheading 3924.90.55) Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•S 3109 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
§ 932.154 Handler transfer. ( a ) Except as hereinafter provided in paragraph (b) of this section, Form COC-6 “Report of Interhandler Transfer” shall be completed by the transferring handler for all lots of processed, but not packaged, olives transferred to another handler within the area and for all lots and sublots of natural condition olives transferred to another handler within the area or shipped to destinations outside the area except fresh market outlets. For natural condition and processed, but not packaged, olives transferred between handlers within the area, two completed copies of said form, signed by the transferring handler, shall accompany the lot or sublot to the receiving handler who shall certify on both copies as to receipt of the olives and forward one copy to the committee within 10 days following receipt of the olives. For natural condition olives transferred by a handler to a destination outside the area, except fresh market outlets, two copies of said form shall be completed by the transferring handler with the words *Outside the Area* included in the upper right corner of the form and one copy shall be returned to the committee within 10 days following transfer of the olives. The completed form shall contain at least the following information: ( 1 ) Name and address of both the transferor and transferee;
( 2 ) date of transfer;
( 3 ) condition (natural, processed but not packaged);
( 4 ) weight, number and size of each type of container;
( 5 ) variety; and
( 6 ) other identification (undersize olives, culls, style, etc.).
( b ) Undersize or cull olives that are transferred from one handler to another and for which the transferring handler desires credit toward satisfaction of his obligation under § 932.51(a)(2) need only be accompanied by two copies of Form COC-5, report of limited and undersize and cull olives inspection and disposition: *Provided,* That such transfers are carried out under the supervision of the Inspection Service.
( c ) No handler may ship any lot or sublot of natural condition olives to a destination outside the area, except fresh market outlets, unless such olives have first been size-graded and meet the disposition and holding requirements applicable under paragraphs (a) (2) and (4) of § 932.51. The size of such transferred olives shall be verified, prior to transfer, by certification issued to the transferring handler by the appropriate inspection service (Federal or Federal-State Inspection Service or the Specialty Crops Inspection Division, USDA).
[31 FR 12636, Sept. 27, 1966, as amended at 36 FR 24795, Dec. 23, 1971; 49 FR 34440, Aug. 31, 1984; 49 FR 44448, Nov. 7, 1984; 88 FR 82233, Nov. 24, 2023]
Exhibit








FOX FACTORY HOLDING CORP.
2013 OMNIBUS PLAN


Amendment to Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement 




WHEREAS, by a Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement effective as of May 4, 2017 (the “Agreement”), Fox Factory Holding Corp., a Delaware corporation (“Fox Factory” or “Company”) granted to Carl Nichols (the “Participant”) a Restricted Stock Unit Award consisting of the right to earn an aggregate of 1,555 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of the Company subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement. 
WHEREAS, the Company and the Participant desire to amend the Agreement to accelerate the vesting of the Award.
NOW, THEREFORE, the definition of “Performance Period” shall be amended in its entirety to provide as follows:
“May 4, 2017 through January 4, 2018”
FURTHER, Section 2(b) of the Agreement shall be amended in its entirety to provide as follows:
“(b) Subject to the terms of this Agreement and those of the Plan, this Award shall vest on January 4, 2018; provided that the Participant’s service as a Director of the Company has not ceased before the particular vesting date. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Award shall vest with respect to all of the Shares, upon the occurrence of the death of the Participant or a Change of Control of the Company; provided in each case that the Participant’s service with the Company has not ceased before the date of the occurrence of such event.”








FOX FACTORY HOLDING CORP.


	
	
	/s/ Larry L. Enterline

	Larry L. Enterline

	Chief Executive Officer

	Date: 1/4/2018








PARTICIPANT


	
	
	/s/ Carl Nichols

	Carl Nichols

	Date: 1/4/2018
# 5241.201 Policy.

   (c) Contracts for the operation of Government-owned facilities by a DON contractor that call for reimbursement of the contractor's utility expense shall specifically provide for the submission of utility subcontracts to NAVFACENGCOM for comment or approval prior to execution of the contract. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 5241.2 - ACQUIRING UTILITY SERVICES