alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 900.404 Subagents. The referendum agent may appoint any person or persons deemed necessary or desirable to assist said agent in performing his functions hereunder. Each person so appointed may be authorized by said agent to perform, in accordance with the requirements herein set forth, any or all of the following functions (which, in the absence of such appointment, shall be performed by said agent): ( a ) Give public notice of the referendum in the manner specified herein;
( b ) Preside at a meeting where ballots are to be cast or as poll officer at a polling place;
( c ) Distribute ballots and the aforesaid texts to producers (and to processors when required) and receive any ballots which are cast; and
( d ) Record the name and address of each person receiving a ballot from, or casting a ballot with, said subagent and inquire into the eligibility of such person to vote in the referendum.
# L_2014246EN.01005901.xml

| 21.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 246/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 246/59

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia's actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 229 of 31 July 2014
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 229 of 31 July 2014

On page 1, recital 5:

for:

| ‘(5) | It is also appropriate to apply restrictions on access to the capital market for certain financial institutions, excluding Russia-based institutions with international status established by intergovernmental agreements with Russia as one of the shareholders. Other financial services such as deposit business, payment services and loans to or from the institutions covered by this Regulation, other than those referred to in Article 5, are not covered by this Regulation.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘(5)

It is also appropriate to apply restrictions on access to the capital market for certain financial institutions, excluding Russia-based institutions with international status established by intergovernmental agreements with Russia as one of the shareholders. Other financial services such as deposit business, payment services and loans to or from the institutions covered by this Regulation, other than those referred to in Article 5, are not covered by this Regulation.’

,

read:

| ‘(5) | It is also appropriate to apply restrictions on access to the capital market for certain financial institutions, excluding Russia-based institutions with international status established by intergovernmental agreements with Russia as one of the shareholders. Other financial services such as deposit business, payment services and loans to or from the institutions covered by this Regulation, other than those referred to in Article 5, are not covered by these restrictions.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘(5)

It is also appropriate to apply restrictions on access to the capital market for certain financial institutions, excluding Russia-based institutions with international status established by intergovernmental agreements with Russia as one of the shareholders. Other financial services such as deposit business, payment services and loans to or from the institutions covered by this Regulation, other than those referred to in Article 5, are not covered by these restrictions.’

;

on page 4, Article 4(4):

for:

‘4.   Where authorisations are requested pursuant to paragraph 2 of this Article, Article 3, and in particular paragraphs 2 and 5 thereof, shall apply mutatis mutandis.’

,

read:

‘4.   Where authorisations are requested pursuant to paragraph 3 of this Article, Article 3, and in particular paragraphs 2 and 5 thereof, shall apply mutatis mutandis.’

.

---
EXHIBIT 35.3
                  SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                           HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL, LLC
           HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2006-HSA5 (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of Homecomings  Financial,  LLC, as
servicer (the "Servicer") pursuant to the applicable  servicing agreement,  does
hereby certify that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under  the   applicable   servicing   agreement  has  been  made  under  my
     supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing  agreement
     in all material respects throughout such period.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:      /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      ------------------------
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title:    Managing Director
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27543 1989HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27544 1989HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27545 1989HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27546 1989HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27547 1989HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27548 1989HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27549 1989HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27550 1989HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27551 1989HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27552 1989HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27553 1989HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27554 1989HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27555 1989HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27556 1989HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27557 1989HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27558 1989HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27559 1989HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27560 1989HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27561 1989HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27562 1989HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27563 1989HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27564 1989HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27565 1989HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27566 1989HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27567 1989HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 27568 1989
Part 5647 - TRANSPORTATION

Subpart 5647.4 - AIR TRANSPORTATION BY U.S. FLAG CARRIERS

5647.402 Policy

5647.402-9000 Flight Service Contract Distribution and Reporting.

Subpart 5647.4 - AIR TRANSPORTATION BY U.S. FLAG

CARRIERS

5647.402 Policy

5647.402-9000 Flight Service Contract Distribution and Reporting.

(a) Whenever flight services are procured from an USAF Air Mobility Command (AMC) approved

carrier (FAA 135 carriers), a copy of the contract must be forwarded to: HQ AMC/A3BS, 402 Scott

Drive, Unit 3A1, Scott AFB, IL 62225-5302. The point of contacts are the AMC Transportation

Assistants, at DSN 779-4801. If EDA distribution is utilized, provide an e-mail notice of the contract

posting to the EDA site.

(b) Report the following information on contracts with USAF AMC approved carriers to AMC

Transportation Assistants on a quarterly basis:

(1) Total cost of contract awards;

(2) Total number of passengers;

(3) Provide a list of open contracts for the period, including contract number, contractor’s name,

total award dollars, and the number of passengers carried.

HQ, United States Special Operations Command

Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L-K)

SOFARS 5647

February 2007
Exhibit 10.8







Current Director Fee Arrangements







Directors of Great Southern Bancorp, Inc. ("Bancorp") receive a monthly fee of $1,000 per regular monthly meeting attended, which is the only compensation paid to directors by Bancorp, except for stock options which may be granted in the discretion of the Board of Directors under Bancorp's 2013 Stock Option and Incentive Plan. Directors of Great Southern Bank receive a monthly fee of $3,000 per regular monthly meeting attended. The directors of Bancorp and the directors of the Bank are the same individuals. The directors of Bancorp and its subsidiaries serving on the Audit Committee are paid a fee of $300 per meeting attended, except for the chairman of the Audit Committee, who is paid a fee of $350 per meeting attended.  Director Brown serves on the Bank's Compliance Committee and is paid a fee of $300 per meeting attended.  The directors of Bancorp and its subsidiaries are not reimbursed for their costs incurred in attending Board and committee meetings.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

§ 800.198 Contracts. ( a ) *Services contracted and who may apply.* The Service may enter into a contract with any person, State, or governmental agency to perform on an occasional basis: ( 1 ) Specified official sampling, laboratory testing, or other similar objective technical activities involved in the testing of grain for official factors or official criteria, and
( 2 ) Monitoring activities in foreign ports with respect to export grain that has been inspected and weighed under the Act.
( b ) *Restrictions* — ( 1 ) *Conflict of interest.* A person, State or governmental agency with a conflict of interest prohibited by section 11 of the Act or § 800.199 shall not be eligible to enter into a contract with the Service.
( 2 ) *Appeal service.* An agency or employees of agencies shall not be eligible to enter into a contract with the Service to obtain samples for, or to perform other services involved in appeal inspection or Board appeal inspection services. However, agencies may forward file samples to the Service in accordance with § 800.156(d).
( 3 ) *Monitoring services.* Agencies, employees of agencies, organizations, employees of organizations, and other persons that regularly provide official services to persons who export grain from the United States are eligible to enter into a contract with the Service to perform monitoring services on export grain in foreign ports only if they are under Service employees' direct supervision during monitoring activities.
( c ) *When and how to apply.* An application for a contractual arrangement shall: ( 1 ) Be typewritten or legibly written in English;
( 2 ) conform to the invitation to bid or other instructions issued by the Service or be filed on a form furnished by the Service;
( 3 ) show or be accompanied by documents which show any information requested by the Service; and
( 4 ) be signed by the applicant or its chief operating officer. All contracts shall be issued by the Department and shall follow Departmental procedures.
( d ) *Termination and renewal.* A contract with the Service shall terminate annually unless othewise provided in the contract. A contract may be renewed in accordance with Departmental procedures.
( e ) *Cancellation.* A contract may, upon request of the governmental agency or person that entered into the contract with the Service, be canceled by the Department in accordance with the terms of the contract or Departmental procedures and regulations.
(The information collection requirements contained in paragraph (c) were approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0580-0012) [49 FR 30915, Aug. 2, 1984, as amended at 50 FR 18989, May 6, 1985; 54 FR 5924, Feb. 7, 1989]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) Case No.: 2:06-mj-075-DRB

 )

RONALD MCQUEEN )

MOTION TO WITHDRAW

COMES NOW undersigned counsel and moves to withdraw as counsel for RONALD

MCQUEEN. In support of this motion, undersigned counsel states:

Mr. McQueen has retained attorney Susan Graham James to represent him.

WHEREFORE, undersigned counsel respectfully asks that this Motion be granted.

Dated this 3rd day of August, 2006.

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Donnie W. Bethel

DONNIE W. BETHEL

Assistant Federal Defender

201 Monroe Street, Suite 407

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Phone: (334) 834-2099

Fax: (334) 834-0353

E-mail:don_bethel@fd.org

IN Bar Code: 14773-49

Case 2:06-mj-00075-DRB Document 11 Filed 08/03/2006 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) Case No.: 2:06-mj-075-DRB

 )

RONALD MCQUEEN )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 3, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk

of Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following: 

Tommie Brown Hardwick, Esquire

Assistant United States Attorney

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Donnie W. Bethel

DONNIE W. BETHEL

Assistant Federal Defender

201 Monroe Street, Suite 407

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Phone: (334) 834-2099

Fax: (334) 834-0353

E-mail:don_bethel@fd.org

IN Bar Code: 14773-49

Case 2:06-mj-00075-DRB Document 11 Filed 08/03/2006 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

July 25, 2006

NOTICE OF DOCKETING ERROR

To: ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD

Case Style: Roger Wright vs. Pemco World Air Services, Inc.

Case Number: 1:06cv647-WKW

Docket Entry Number: #3 Order

The Order referenced above was docketed in the wrong case in error and is hereby

STRICKEN from the record. Parties are instructed to disregard this entry on the court’s

docket for this case.

Case 1:06-cv-00647-WKW-SRW Document 4 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 9 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### John Moody, Respondent, v Svetlana Sorokina, Appellant.

Submitted October 1, 2007;

decided November 27, 2007

Reported below, 40 AD3d 14.

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that simultaneous appeals do not lie to the Appellate Division and the Court of Appeals, unless within 20 days appellant, if she be so advised, serves upon all parties and files in the Court of Appeals a notice that she has abandoned her appeal to the Appellate Division and stipulates for the withdrawal of that appeal *(see Parker v Rogerson,*35 NY2d 751, 753-754 [1974]). Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that simultaneous appeals do not lie to both the Appellate Division and the Court of Appeals *(see id,.).*Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

BEN F. BEARD, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 2:06-653-WHA

)

LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS, INC., )

d/b/a LEHMAN CAPITAL, PETER R. )

KERN, OAK ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC, )

MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, INC., ) 

JOLLY ROGER, LLC; JOLLY ROGER I, INC.,)

CAPITAL SEVEN RECOVERY, LLC, )

PETER FAHEY, LARRY W. CARLSON, )

)

Defendants. )

MOTION TO STAY OR EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO

MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE AND MOTION TO TRANSFER/REASSIGN CASE

COMES NOW the Plaintiff, Ben F. Beard (“Beard”), and requests the Court to stay or

extend the deadlines set forth in the Court’s August 2, 2006, Order. In support thereof, the

Plaintiff would show the Court the following:

1. On August 2, 2006, the Court entered its Order which directed the parties to

respond to the pending Motion to Transfer Venue and Motion to Transfer/Reassign Case by no

later than August 16, 2006. 

2. Filed contemporaneously with this Motion is the Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand

and Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Remand. The Motion to Remand addresses

certain procedural flaws within the Notice of Removal and requests the Court to remand the case

back to the Circuit Court of Pike County, Alabama. 

Case 2:06-cv-00653-WHA-CSC Document 13 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 1 of 3
G:\wpusers\LRB\Beard 2410\p-motion to stay or extend deadline.wpd 2

3. In light of the filing of this Motion to Remand, the Plaintiff would request the

Court to enter an Order which revises its August 2, 2006 Order so that the responses to the

Motion to Transfer Venue and the Motion to Transfer/Reassign Case are stayed or, if necessary,

extended until a specific deadline after a ruling upon the Motion to Remand. 

4. The Plaintiff would further show the Court that a revision in the deadlines in the

Court’s August 2, 2006, Order will not prejudice the other parties and would be in the interest of

judicial economy and efficiency. 

/s/Lee R. Benton

Lee R. Benton

ASB: 8421-E63L

/s/C. Steven Ball

C. Steven Ball

ASB: 5126-A64C

OF COUNSEL:

BENTON & CENTENO, LLP

2019 Third Avenue North

Birmingham, Alabama 35203

Phone: (205) 278-8000

Facsimile: (205) 278-8008

Case 2:06-cv-00653-WHA-CSC Document 13 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 2 of 3
G:\wpusers\LRB\Beard 2410\p-motion to stay or extend deadline.wpd 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have served a copy of the foregoing pleading by electronic

transmission or by first class mail to the following on this the 11 day of August, 2006: th

David B. Anderson

Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis, L.L.P. 

1901 6 Ave N. Ste. 1400 th

Birmingham, AL 35203

Terry L. Butts

P.O. Box 272

Luverne, AL 36049

Michael E. Jones

Jones & Coots, LLC

P.O. Box 367

Luverne, Alabama 36049

Steven G. Brody

King & Spalding, LLP

1185 Avenue of the Americas

New York, NY 10036

/s/C. Steven Ball

Of Counsel

Case 2:06-cv-00653-WHA-CSC Document 13 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 3 of 3
Continuing Abatement Order filed March 27 , 20 1 2

.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14

- 11

- 0 0 78 3

- CV

____________

JASON FELT
, CANARY FINANCIAL, INC.
, JONATHAN WASSERBERG, AND

WASSERBERG INVESTMENTS, Appellant s

V.

COMERICA BANK , Appellee

On Appeal from the 80 th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2009

- 50665

CONTINUING ABATEMENT ORDER

This appeal was abated for a hearing pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure

306a. An extension of time to file the supplemental clerk's record was granted at

appellant's request until March 19, 2010. As of this date, no record has been filed.

The parties are di rected to inform the court within ten days of the date of this order

of the status of their 306a motion in the trial court.

Th is appeal remains abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court ' s

active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court ' s active docket when the2

supplemental clerk ' s record is filed in this Court. The Court will also consider an

appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the Court may reinstate

the appeal on its own motion.

PER CURIAM
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. David Rozzell, Appellant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered June 21,1968 upon resentence, affirmed. The order of said court dated November 24, 1967 was reviewed on this appeal. In our opinion, the Criminal Term did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant’s application to withdraw his guilty plea. On the record before it and upon the testimony at the hearing, the court was warranted in finding (1) that there was no substance to appellant’s *675belated protestations of innocence, he having knowingly and voluntarily admitted his guilt, and (2) that his guilty plea was not the product of coercion or misunderstanding. We find no merit to appellant’s claims as respects the alleged violation of the attorney-client privilege. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Munder, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Homer Bryant, Appellant.

— Application by assigned counsel to be relieved as counsel for appellant granted only to the extent of assigning alternate counsel to expeditiously prosecute this appeal by whatever means deemed appropriate. Such is the relief requested by defendant in his separate motion dated September 19, 1979. The *pro se*motion papers submitted by defendant allude to nonfrivolous appellate issues. This, together with present counsel’s failure to adequately comply with the "guidelines” provided in *People v Saunders*(52 AD2d 833) *(People v Carroll,*72 AD2d 710), would appear to render counsel ineligible for compensation for his efforts in this matter *(People v Perry,*73 AD2d 545). In view of the foregoing defendant’s motion is also granted to the extent indicated. Concur — Fein, J. P., Sandler, Sullivan, Bloom and Lupiano, JJ.
## U NITED 

## S TATES 

## A IR 

## F ORCE 

## C OURT OF 

## C RIMINAL 

## A PPEALS

_______ _______ __________ No. ACM 38955

_______ _______ __________ UNITED STATES Appellee

v. Michael T. MAHER Technical Sergeant (E

- 6 ) , U.S. Air Force, Appellant

_______ _______ __________ A ppeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary Decided 20 April 2017

_______ _______ __________ Military Judge: Shelly W. Schools

. Approved se ntence: Dishonorable discharge, confinement for 10 years, reduction to E

- 1. Sentence adjudged 21 October 2015 by GCM convened at Minot Air Force Base, North Dakota

. For Appellant: Major Johnathan D. Legg , USAF. For Appellee: Gerald R. Bruce , Esquire

. Before DREW , J. BROWN , and MINK , Appellate Military Judges

.

_______ _______ __________ This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, do es not serve as precedent under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 18.4.

_______ _______ __________ PER CURIAM: The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 59(a) and 66(c), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(c).United States v. Maher , No. ACM 38955

2 Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT

MICAH L. SMITH Deputy Clerk of the Court
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.1



2018 Cash Bonus Plan


Eligible Employees: Executive Officers, Vice Presidents, Directors, Managers, and Individual Contributors


		
	•
	Bonus target payouts based on a percentage of base salary;




		
	•
	Payouts to CFO, COO and Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary will be entirely based on achievement of certain minimum targets, and 200% payable upon the achievement of certain maximum target levels;




		
	•
	Payouts to Directors are based 30% on corporate targets, and 70% on management business objectives;




		
	•
	Payouts to Managers are based 0% on corporate targets, and 100% on management business objectives;




		
	•
	Payouts to Individual Contributors are based 0% on corporate targets, and 100% on management business objectives;




		
	•
	Bonus targets are as follows (expressed as a percentage of base salary):




        	
							
	 
	 
	Target Payout
	 
	Financial Weight (Adj. EBITDA)
	 
	Management Business Objectives Weight

	CFO
	 
	50%
	 
	100%
	 
	0%

	COO
	 
	50%
	 
	100%
	 
	0%

	VP & General Counsel
	 
	40%
	 
	100%
	 
	0%

	VPs
	 
	35%
	 
	100%
	 
	0%

	Directors
	 
	15%
	 
	30%
	 
	70%

	Managers
	 
	10%
	 
	0%
	 
	100%

	Individual Contributors
	 
	5%
	 
	0%
	 
	100%