21936 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 19, 2011 / Notices 

Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan 

Application Deadline Date: 01/09/2012. 

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan 

applications to: U.S. Small Business 

Administration, Processing and 

Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 

Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. 

Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, 

U.S. Small Business Administration, 

409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, 

Washington, DC 20416. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is 

hereby given that as a result of the 

President’s major disaster declaration on 

04/08/2011, Private Non-Profit 

organizations that provide essential 

services of governmental nature may file 

disaster loan applications at the address 

listed above or other locally announced 

locations. 

The following areas have been 

determined to be adversely affected by 

the disaster: 

Primary Counties: Hawaii Honolulu 

Maui. 

The Interest Rates are: 

Percent 

For Physical Damage: 

Non-Profit Organizations with 

Credit Available Elsewhere 3.250 

Non-Profit Organizations 

without Credit Available 

Elsewhere ......................... 3.000 

For Economic Injury: 

Non-Profit Organizations 

without Credit Available 

Elsewhere ......................... 3.000 

The number assigned to this disaster 

for physical damage is 12526E and for 

economic injury is 12527E. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance 

Numbers 59002 and 59008) 

Joseph P. Loddo, 

Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2011–9388 Filed 4–18–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025–01–P 

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 

[Disaster Declaration #12501 and #12502] 

Missouri Disaster Number MO–00047 

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business 

Administration. 

ACTION: Amendment 1. 

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the 

Presidential declaration of a major 

disaster for Public Assistance Only for 

the State of Missouri (FEMA–1961–DR), 

dated 03/23/2011. 

Incident: Severe winter storm and 

snowstorm. 

Incident Period: 01/31/2011 through 

02/05/2011. 

Effective Date: 04/11/2011. 

Physical Loan Application Deadline 

Date: 05/23/2011. 

Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan 

Application Deadline Date: 12/23/2011. 

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan 

applications to: U.S. Small Business 

Administration, Processing and 

Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 

Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. 

Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, 

U.S. Small Business Administration, 

409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, 

Washington, DC 20416. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice 

of the President’s major disaster 

declaration for Private Non-Profit 

organizations in the State of Missouri, 

dated 03/23/2011, is hereby amended to 

include the following areas as adversely 

affected by the disaster. 

Primary Counties: Camden. 

All other information in the original 

declaration remains unchanged. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance 

Numbers 59002 and 59008) 

Joseph P. Loddo, 

Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2011–9445 Filed 4–18–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025–01–P 

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 

[License No. 09/79–0454] 

Emergence Capital Partners SBIC, 

L.P.; Notice Seeking Exemption Under 

Section 312 of the Small Business 

Investment Act, Conflicts of Interest 

Notice is hereby given that Emergence 

Capital Partners SBIC, L.P., 160 Bovet 

Road, Suite 300, San Mateo, CA 94402, 

a Federal Licensee under the Small 

Business Investment Act of 1958, as 

amended (‘‘the Act’’), in connection with 

the financing of a small concern, has 

sought an exemption under Section 312 

of the Act and Section 107.730, 

Financings which Constitute Conflicts 

of Interest, of the Small Business 

Administration (‘‘SBA’’) Rules and 

Regulations (13 CFR 107.730). 

Emergence Capital Partners SBIC, L.P. 

proposes to provide equity financing to 

InsideView Technologies, Inc., 444 

DeHaro Street, Suite 210, San Francisco, 

CA 94107 (‘‘InsideView’’). The financing 

is contemplated for general operating 

purposes. 

The financing is brought within the 

purview of § 107.730(a)(1) of the 

Regulations because Emergence Capital 

Partners, L.P. and Emergence Capital 

Associates, L.P., Associates of 

Emergence Capital Partners SBIC, L.P., 

own in aggregate more than ten percent 

of InsideView. Therefore, InsideView is 

considered an Associate of Emergence 

Capital Partners SBIC, L.P. and the 

transaction is considered as financing 

an Associate, requiring prior written 

exemption from SBA. 

Notice is hereby given that any 

interested person may submit written 

comments on the transaction on or 

before May 4, 2011 to the Associate 

Administrator for Investment, U.S. 

Small Business Administration, 409 

Third Street, SW., Washington, DC 

20416. 

Dated: April 7, 2011. 

Sean Greene, 

Associate Administrator for Investment. 

[FR Doc. 2011–9102 Filed 4–18–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE M 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Aviation Rulemaking Advisory 

Committee—New Task 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of new task assignment 

for the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory 

Committee (ARAC). 

SUMMARY: The FAA assigned the 

Aviation Rulemaking Advisory 

Committee (ARAC) a new task to 

provide advice and recommendations to 

the FAA about how to prioritize 

rulemaking projects. This task 

addresses, in part, one of the 

Department of Transportation’s Future 

of Aviation Advisory Committee 

(FAAC) recommendations. This notice 

informs the public of a new ARAC 

activity and solicits membership for the 

new Rulemaking Prioritization Working 

Group. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Katherine Haley, Office of Rulemaking, 

Federal Aviation Administration, 800 

Independence Avenue, SW., 

Washington, DC 20591; telephone: 202– 

493–5708, facsimile: 202–267–5075; 

e-mail: Katherine.L.Haley@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The FAA established ARAC to 

provide advice and recommendations to 

the FAA Administrator on the FAA’s 

rulemaking activities. ARAC’s objectives 

are to improve the development of the 

FAA’s regulations by providing 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 19, 2011 / Notices 21937 

information, advice, and 

recommendations related to aviation 

issues. 

On April 16, 2010, the Secretary of 

the Department of Transportation 

established the Future of Aviation 

Advisory Committee (FAAC) to provide 

information, advice and 

recommendations to ensure the 

competitiveness of the United States 

aviation industry and its capability to 

address the evolving transportation 

needs, challenges and opportunities of 

the United States and global economies. 

As a result, the FAAC developed 23 

recommendations which were 

submitted on December 15, 2010. The 

Rulemaking Prioritization Working 

Group will specifically address, in part, 

Recommendation #22: ‘‘The Secretary 

should quickly review the existing 

regulatory and safety initiative calendar 

and provide parameters and criteria for 

the FAA to prioritize its current and 

future rulemaking program. This review 

should include industry, or at a 

minimum seek industry input, and the 

results should be made publicly 

available * * *.’’ 

The objective of the Rulemaking 

Prioritization Working Group is to 

provide advice and recommendations 

on developing a framework and 

methodologies to assist the FAA in 

assessing and sequencing potential 

rulemaking projects. The FAA will 

provide the Rulemaking Prioritization 

Working Group with a subset of issues 

to test the prototype. These issues are 

potential rulemaking projects from the 

FAA’s four-year regulatory look-ahead. 

When developing the prototype, the 

working group should review models 

and methodologies as references, 

including the Commercial Aviation 

Safety Team (CAST) methodology. In 

1998, the FAA founded the CAST to 

develop an integrated, data-driven 

strategy to reduce the commercial 

aviation fatality risk in the United States 

and promote new government and 

industry safety initiatives throughout 

the world. The CAST methodology 

identifies top safety areas through the 

analysis of accident and incident data. 

The working group should use the 

CAST methodology as a reference and 

not limit the criteria to safety. While 

safety is a critical factor, the working 

group should consider all drivers that 

influence the need to consider 

rulemaking; e.g., safety, capacity, cost, 

environmental impacts, harmonization, 

operations, and other needs. 

The March 2011 ARAC Executive 

Committee meeting included a 

presentation of solicited ideas and 

proposed actions for the Executive 

Committee members to consider. This 

notice advises the public that the FAA 

has assigned, and the Executive 

Committee has accepted, a task to 

develop a report including 

recommendations on how to prioritize 

rulemaking projects. 

The Task 

The FAA has tasked the ARAC 

working group to provide advice and 

recommendations on developing a 

framework and methodologies to assist 

the FAA in assessing and sequencing 

potential rulemaking projects. 

The working group is expected to 

develop a report containing 

recommendations on how the agency 

should prioritize rulemaking projects. 

This report should document both 

majority and minority positions on the 

findings and the rationale for each 

position. Any disagreements should be 

documented, including the rationale for 

each position and the reasons for the 

disagreement. In developing its 

recommendations, the working group 

shall: 

1. Review FAAC Recommendation 

#22, which can be found at http:// 

www.dot.gov/faac/ 

FAAC_Recommendations.pdf. 

2. Define a process to evaluate 

rulemaking projects. 

3. Evaluate and consider the 

parameters and criteria of the risk 

assessment methodology, ensuring the 

most effective project receives the 

highest priority. This includes 

considering all drivers of rulemaking; 

e.g., safety, capacity, cost, 

environmental impacts, harmonization, 

operations, and other needs. 

4. Explore models and/or 

methodologies that would be helpful in 

developing the risk assessment 

methodology. This includes reviewing 

the CAST methodology, which can be 

found at http://www.cast-safety.org/ 

index.cfm. 

5. Develop a classification system to 

rank rulemaking projects. 

6. Develop a model to use as a 

prototype and test it with the subset of 

issues the FAA provides. 

7. Consider ARAC’s role after the FAA 

implements the rulemaking 

prioritization methodology. 

Schedule: The recommendations must 

be forwarded to the ARAC Executive 

Committee for review and approval no 

later than December 2011. The working 

group may be assigned additional tasks 

leading to implementation of parameters 

and criteria that will assist the FAA in 

prioritizing its rulemaking program by 

December 2012. 

ARAC Acceptance of Task 

The ARAC Executive Committee has 

accepted the task and assigned it to the 

Rulemaking Prioritization Working 

Group. The working group serves as 

staff to ARAC and assists in the analysis 

of the assigned task. ARAC must review 

and approve the working group’s 

recommendations. If ARAC accepts the 

working group’s recommendations, it 

will send them to the FAA. 

Working Group Activity 

The Rulemaking Prioritization 

Working Group must comply with the 

procedures adopted by ARAC. As part 

of the procedures, the working group 

must: 

1. Recommend a work plan for 

completion of the task, including the 

rationale supporting such a plan, for 

consideration at the next ARAC 

Executive Committee meeting held 

following publication of this notice. 

2. Provide a status report at each 

meeting of the ARAC Executive 

Committee. 

3. Draft the recommendation report 

and required analyses and/or any other 

related materials or documents. 

4. Present the final recommendations 

to the ARAC Executive Committee for 

review and approval. 

Participation in the Working Group 

The Rulemaking Prioritization 

Working Group will be comprised of 

technical experts having an interest in 

the assigned task. A working group 

member need not be a representative or 

a member of the full committee. The 

FAA would like a wide range of 

members to ensure all aspects of 

rulemaking are considered in 

development of the recommendations. 

If you wish to become a member of 

the Rulemaking Prioritization Working 

Group, write the person listed under the 

caption FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT expressing that desire. Describe 

your interest in the task and state the 

expertise you would bring to the 

working group. We must receive all 

requests by May 9, 2011. The Executive 

Committee and the FAA will review the 

requests and advise you whether or not 

your request is approved. 

If you are chosen for membership on 

the working group, you must actively 

participate in the working group by 

attending all meetings, and providing 

written comments when requested to do 

so. You must devote the resources 

necessary to support the working group 

in meeting any assigned deadlines. You 

must keep your management chain and 

those you may represent advised of 

working group activities and decisions 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

21938 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 19, 2011 / Notices 

to ensure the proposed technical 

solutions do not conflict with your 

sponsoring organization’s position when 

the subject is presented to ARAC for 

approval. Once the working group has 

begun deliberations, members will not 

be added or substituted without the 

approval of the FAA and the working 

group chair. 

The Secretary of Transportation 

determined the formation and use of 

ARAC is necessary and in the public 

interest in connection with the 

performance of duties imposed on the 

FAA by law. 

ARAC meetings are open to the 

public. However, ARAC Rulemaking 

Prioritization Working Group meetings 

are not open to the public, except to the 

extent individuals with an interest and 

expertise are selected to participate. The 

FAA will make no public 

announcement of working group 

meetings. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on April 13, 

2011. 

Pamela Hamilton-Powell, 

Executive Director, Aviation Rulemaking 

Advisory Committee. 

[FR Doc. 2011–9399 Filed 4–18–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Notice of Intent To Prepare an 

Environmental Assessment and 

Request for Public Scoping Comments 

for the Air Tour Management Plan 

Program at Big Cypress National 

Preserve 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of Intent to Prepare an 

Environmental Assessment and to 

Request Public Scoping Comments. 

SUMMARY: The FAA, with National Park 

Service (NPS) as a cooperating agency, 

has initiated development of an Air 

Tour Management Plan (ATMP) for Big 

Cypress National Preserve (Big Cypress), 

pursuant to the National Parks Air Tour 

Management Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106– 

181) and its implementing regulations 

(14 CFR Part 136, Subpart B, National 

Parks Air Tour Management). The 

objective of the ATMP is to develop 

acceptable and effective measures to 

mitigate or prevent the significant 

adverse impacts, if any, of commercial 

air tour operations on the natural 

resources, cultural resources, and visitor 

experiences of a national park unit and 

any tribal lands within or abutting the 

park. It should be noted that the ATMP 

has no authorization over other non-airtour operations such as military and 

general aviation operations.In 

compliance with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA) and FAA Order 1050.1E, an 

Environmental Assessment (EA) is being 

prepared. 

The FAA and NPS are now inviting 

the public, agencies, tribes, and other 

interested parties to provide comments, 

suggestions, and input on the scope of 

issues to be addressed in the 

environmental process. 

DATES: By this notice, the FAA as lead 

agency is requesting comments on the 

scope of the EA for the ATMP at Big 

Cypress. Comments must be submitted 

by May 19, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Keith Lusk—Mailing address: P.O. Box 

92007, Los Angeles, California 90009– 

2007. Telephone: (310) 725–3808. Street 

address: 15000 Aviation Boulevard, 

Lawndale, California 90261. 

Written comments on the scope of the 

EA should be submitted electronically 

via the electronic public comment form 

on the NPS Planning, Environment and 

Public Comment System at: http:// 

parkplanning.nps.gov/BICY_ATMP,or 

sent to the mailing address above. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A public 

scoping packet that describes the project 

in greater detail is available at: 

• http://www.faa.gov/about/office_

org/headquarters_offices/arc/programs/

air_tour_management_plan/park_

specific_plans/big_cypress.cfm 

• http://parkplanning.nps.gov/ 

BICY_ATMP 

Notice Regarding FOIA: Individuals 

may request that their name and/or 

address be withheld from public 

disclosure. If you wish to do this, you 

must state this prominently at the 

beginning of your comment. 

Commenters using the website can make 

such a request by checking the box 

‘‘keep my contact information private.’’ 

Such requests will be honored to the 

extent allowable by law, but you should 

be aware that pursuant to the Freedom 

of Information Act, your name and 

address may be disclosed. We will make 

all submissions from organizations, 

businesses, and from individuals 

identifying themselves as 

representatives or officials of 

organizations or businesses available for 

public inspection in their entirety. 

Issued in Hawthorne, CA, on April 12, 

2011. 

Keith Lusk, 

Program Manager, Special Programs Staff, 

Western-Pacific Region. 

[FR Doc. 2011–9402 Filed 4–18–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Potential Environmental Impacts of the 

Proposed Runway 13 Extension and 

Associated Actions for the Devils Lake 

Regional Airport in Devils Lake, ND 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), Department of 

Transportation (DOT). 

ACTION: Notice of availability of a final 

EA and FONSI/ROD for the evaluation 

of the potential environmental impacts 

associated with the proposed Runway 

13 extension and associated actions for 

Devils Lake Regional Airport in Devils 

Lake, North Dakota. 

SUMMARY: The FAA has issued the final 

EA and FONSI/ROD for the proposed 

Runway 13 extension and associated 

actions for Devils Lake Regional Airport. 

The EA was prepared in accordance 

with the National Environmental Policy 

Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended, FAA 

Orders 1050.1E, ‘‘Environmental 

Impacts: Policies and Procedures’’ and 

FAA Order 5050.4B, ‘‘NEPA 

Implementing Instructions for Airport 

Actions’’. 

Point of Contact: Ms. Patricia 

Dressler, Environmental Protection 

Specialist, FAA Bismarck Airports 

District Office (ADO), 2301 University 

Drive, Building 23B, Bismarck, North 

Dakota, 58504. Telephone number (701) 

323–7380. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA 

is issuing a final EA and FONSI/ROD 

that evaluated the potential 

environmental impacts associated with 

the proposed runway extension and 

associated actions at Devils Lake 

Regional Airport located in Devils Lake, 

North Dakota. Based on the analysis 

contained in the final EA, the FAA has 

determined the selected alternative has 

no associated significant impacts to 

resources identified in accordance with 

FAA Order 1050.1E, Environmental 

Impacts: Policies and Procedures and 

FAA Order 5054.4B, National 

Environmental Policy Act Implementing 

Instructions for Airport Actions. 

Therefore, no environmental impact 

statement will be prepared. The runway 

extension project is needed to enhance 

the utility and safety of the Devils Lake 

Regional Airport for current and 

projected levels of aviation by the 

design aircraft family. 

Eight alternatives were studied for 

meeting the purpose and need. Four of 

the eight alternatives (including new 

location) were reviewed, analyzed, 

discarded due to the degree of 

environmental impacts and not meeting 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES