alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3433 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3433

               For the relief of Michael Anthony Hurley.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 6, 2006

 Ms. Landrieu introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
               For the relief of Michael Anthony Hurley.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR MICHAEL ANTHONY HURLEY.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1151) and section 
240 of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1229a), Michael Anthony Hurley shall be 
eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 
to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon 
filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 
204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Michael Anthony Hurley enters the 
United States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), 
he shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and, if 
otherwise eligible, shall be eligible for adjustment of status under 
section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) as 
of the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees not later than 2 years after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Michael Anthony Hurley, the 
Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, 
during the current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)) or, if applicable, the total number 
of immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Michael 
Anthony Hurley shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded 
any right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality 
Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.).
                                 <all>
```
#### §§ 4288.114-4288.119 [Reserved]
928.370 Service-type insurance policies.

(a) Service-type insurance policies are cost-reimbursement type contracts or subcontracts in which

the insurer provides claim and loss adjustment services on a cost reimbursement basis, which

satisfies state and Federal insurance requirements.

(b) Service-type insurance policies may be used with contracting officer approval, when one or more

of the following conditions are present -

(1) Pure risk commercial insurance is not available or, if available, cost is not considered reasonable;

(2) Inherent risks in the contract are new and a part of the process of commercialization;

(3) The service-type insurance is needed to implement jointly funded projects; or

(4) The service-type insurance arrangement is considered in the Government's best interest.

Parent topic: Subpart 928.3 - Insurance
Case 2:06-cv-00678-WKW-SRW Document 2 Filed 08/03/2006 Page 1 of 1
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3297 

To suspend temporarily the duty on electric coffee grinders. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 26, 2006 

Mr. ALLEN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on electric coffee grinders. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELECTRIC COFFEE GRINDERS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.85.09 Electric coffee grinders (provided for in 

subheading 8509.40.00) .......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•S 3297 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Data Tree, LLC, Appellant, v Edward P. Romaine, Respondent.

Submitted October 9, 2007;

decided October 11, 2007

Reported below, 36 AD3d 804.

Motion by Advance Publications, Inc. et al. for leave to file a brief amici curiae on the appeal herein granted. Two copies of the brief must be served and 24 copies filed within seven days.
Thompson, Coe, Cousins & Irons, L.L.P. Attorneys and Counselors

701 Brazos | Suite 1500 | Austin, TX 78701 | (888) 708

- 8200 | Fax: (512) 708

- 8777 Wade C. Crosnoe Direct Dial: (512) 703

- 5078 wcrosnoe@thompsoncoe.com Board Certified in Civil Appellate Law Texas Board of Legal Specialization Austin Dallas Houston Los Angeles

Saint Paul February 17, 2015

Jeffrey D. Kyle, Clerk Via E

- Filing Court of Appeals Third District of Texas P. O. Box 12547 Austin, Texas 78711-2547

Re: No. 03-14-00660- CV, Craig Zgabay and Tammy Zgabay v. NBRC Property Owners Assoc. , in the Third District Court of Appeals at Austin

Dear Mr. Kyle:

I am writing to acknowledge receipt of the Court’s February 6, 2015 letter notifying counsel of the oral argument scheduled for March 25, 2015 at 1:30 p.m. I will present oral argument on behalf of Appellee NBRC Property Owners Association

. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Wade Crosnoe Wade C. Crosnoe WCC:lbm

cc: Via E- service or E

- mail

J. Patrick Sutton 1706 W. 10th Street Austin, Texas 78703 E- Mail: jpatricksutton@jpatricksuttonlaw.com Counsel for Appellants

2155415v1 05049.028 ACCEPTED 03-14-00660-CV 4175563 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 2/17/2015 1:00:01 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK
## Material Characterization of Carbon Nanotubes for Molecular Identity (MI) Determination & Nomenclature

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

June 2010

Docket Identification Number

EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0686Material Characterization of Carbon Nanotubes for Molecular Identity (MI) De termination & Nomenclature

Structural features that may be important

Primary MI features: 1. Molecular Weight 2. wall/tube number

• e.g., single-, double-, multi-w alled (average, range)

• for multi-walled: concentric cylinders (“Russian Doll” ) or scroll (rolled up “Parchment”) 3. wall/tube ends

• e.g., open, individually capped, ends connect ed together in a circular or loop shape 4. tube length (average, range) 5. wall/tube width/diameter

• outer wall/tube and inne r cavity (average, range) 6. ring size/connectivity

• 6-membered (typically), but also pr ovide % (?) 5 and/or 7 and/or 7+ 7. hexagonal array orientation

• armchair, zig-zag, chiral (determined by chiral angle/vector measurement) 8. alignment of long axis

• e.g., straight, bent, buckled, branched , helical, circular, spaghetti-like

• cause if other than straight (e.g., stress or structural)

Secondary MI features: 1. deformities

• e.g., bumps, gaps 2. ring hybridization

• graphene (typically)

 graphyne (theoretically; e .g., bow-tie, linear, star) 3. agglomeration, aggregation

Other relevant information: 1. manufacture

• method (e.g., CA, CVD, PLV, HiPCO)

• catalyst (chemical identity, quantity us ed and incorporated, particle size) 2. purity

• impurity type, amount, and source 3. complexation, surface treatment, encapsulation (entrainment)

• non-covalent

• e.g., coated, modified, other 4. doping 5. uses
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 13 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 13 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 13 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 13 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 13 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 13 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 6 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 13-2 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 1 of 1
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

WILLIE MCNAIR, )

)

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2:06-cv-695-WKW

)

RICHARD ALLEN, et al., )

)

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. )

____________________________________

)

JAMES CALLAHAN, )

)

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2:06-cv-919-WKW

)

RICHARD ALLEN, et al., )

)

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. )

ORDER

Upon consideration of the plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Authority

(Doc. # 49), it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. 

Done this 17th day of April, 2007.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 50 Filed 04/17/2007 Page 1 of 1
SERVED JUNE 25, 2010 

u s DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

I IN THE MATTER OF 

FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 

I ; FAA DOCKET No CP10GL0004 

[ : (Civil Penalty Action) 

i i DMSFAA-2010-0539 

f ORDER GRANTING MOTION 

TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER 

The Complaint of Complainant Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter 

"Complainant") was filed on May 20, 2010. The matter was assigned to the undersigned 

by Order served June 10, 2010. We issued a Procedural Order on June 22, 2010. 

On June 2, 2010, Respondent Federal Express Corporation (hereinafter 

"Respondent") moved that the time to answer the Complaint be extended to July 23, 

2010. In support Respondent cites pressing competing obligations. Respondent also 

states that Complainant does not oppose the motion. 

For good cause shown. Respondent's motion is hereby GRANTED. 

Respondent's Answer will be due on July 23, 2010. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

I Attachment - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CP09GL0004 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Courtney E. Felts, Esq., Staff Attorney II 

Federal Express Corporation 

Regulatory Affairs, Legal Department 

3620 Hacks Cross Road 

Building B, 3rd Floor 

Memphis, TN 38125 

TEL: (901)434-8632 

FAX: (901)434-8283 

Kate Barber, Attorney 

Office of the Regional Counsel, AGL-7B 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2300 East Devon Avenue 

DesPlaines,IL 60018 

TEL: (847)294-7862 

FAX: (847)294-8293 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL: (202) 366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

(202) 366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: (202)366-7536 

uV. 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 

2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
#### § 948.16 Committee.

*Committee* means any of the area committees established pursuant to § 948.50 or the Colorado Potato Committee established pursuant to § 948.51.
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of
the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Avago Technologies Finance Pte. Ltd. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such
officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the accompanying report of the Company on Form 20-F/A for the period ended November 2, 2008 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                                                  
|------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: June 16, 2009 |  | /s/    DOUGLAS R.
BETTINGER                      
|                    |  | Douglas R. Bettinger                             
|                    |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

WILLIE MCNAIR, )

)

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2:06-cv-695-WKW

)

RICHARD ALLEN, et al., )

)

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. )

____________________________________

)

JAMES CALLAHAN, )

)

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2:06-cv-919-WKW

)

RICHARD ALLEN, et al., )

)

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the deadline for filing supplemental summary judgment briefing is

CONTINUED from November 12, 2007, to 12:00 p.m. (CST) on November 13, 2007.

DONE this 8th day of November, 2007.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 136 Filed 11/08/2007 Page 1 of 1
ACCEPTED 04-14-00806-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 3/10/2015 4:27:12 PM KEITH HOTTLE CLERK
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Nidhi Andalon, Chief Financial Officer of Qualstar Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Dated: May 11, 2011
By:
/s/ NIDHI ANDALONNidhi AndalonVice President and Principal Financial Officer
§ 97.301 Commissioner's answer. ( a ) The Commissioner may, within such time as may be directed by the Secretary, furnish a written statement to the Secretary in answer to the appellant's petition, including such explanation of the reasons for the action as may be necessary and supplying a copy to the appellant.
( b ) Within 20 days from the date of such answer, the appellant may file a reply statement directed only to such new points of argument as may be raised in the Commissioner's answer.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

TERRY DEESE, * 

 * 

 Plaintiff, * 

 * 

v. * Case No. 06-643-MHT 

 * 

CHAMPION ENTERPRISES, INC., * 

 * 

 Defendant. * 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SEAL

COMES NOW the Plaintiff, by and through his undersigned counsel and hereby files his 

Motion for Leave to Seal Plaintiff’s Response to Defendants’ Renewed Motion to Dismiss, or in 

the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment and exhibits attached to motion, and as grounds 

therefore, the Plaintiff would state as follows: 

1. On October 3, 2006, a protective order was filed in this case (Doc. No. 18). 

2. Documents referenced and attached as exhibits to Plaintiff’s Response to 

Defendants’ Renewed Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment 

are documents that were either introduced during Champion Enterprises Inc.’s Corporate 

Representative’s deposition, obtained from Champion Enterprises Inc.’s website, or documents 

produced by Plaintiff’s expert, Edward W. Sauls. 

Pursuant to Paragraph b of the Order on Motion and Stipulated Protective OrderConfidentiality (Doc. No. 18), Plaintiff Terry Deese hereby respectfully requests this Honorable 

Court order Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Renewed Motion to Dismiss or, in the 

Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment and exhibits attached be sealed. 

Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 35 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 1 of 3
2

Respectfully submitted this 23rd of July, 2007. 

 /s/ C. Lance Gould _ 

 C. LANCE GOULD (ASB-0913-G66C) 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

OF COUNSEL: 

BEASLEY, ALLEN, CROW, 

METHVIN, PORTIS & MILES, P.C. 

Attorneys at Law 

Post Office Box 4160 

Montgomery, AL 36103-4160 

(334) 269-2343 

(334) 954-7555 (fax) 

Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 35 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have electronically filed the original of the foregoing document in 

this Court and served a copy upon all Defendants of record as listed below by placing a copy of 

same in the United States Mail, first class, postage prepaid on this the 23rd day of July, 2007. 

 C. Lance Gould 

 OF COUNSEL 

Gregory S. Ritchey 

RITCHEY & SIMPSON, PLLC 

3288 Morgan Drive, Suite 100 

Birmingham, Alabama 35216 

Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 35 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 3 of 3
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3431 

To require the liquidation or reliquidation of certain entries of large 

newspaper printing presses and components thereof. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 6, 2006 

Mr. DURBIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To require the liquidation or reliquidation of certain entries 

of large newspaper printing presses and components thereof. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIQUIDATION OR RELIQUIDATION OF ENTRIES 

4 RELATING TO NEWSPAPER PRINTING PRESS5 ES. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Bu7 reau of Customs and Border Protection shall, not later 

8 than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, liq9 uidate or reliquidate the entries described in, and in ac10 cordance with the antidumping duty rate of 59.67 percent 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•S 3431 IS 

1 provided in, the Final Results of the Changed Cir2 cumstances Review in Department of Commerce case A– 

3 588–837 (45 Fed. Reg. 11590; March 8, 2006) for the 

4 period September 1, 1997 through August 31, 1998, plus 

5 any applicable interest due. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<PERIOD-TYPE> 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                               MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                   SEPT-30-1997
<CASH>                                                              317,697
<SECURITIES>                                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                     1,085,728
<ALLOWANCES>                                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                          0<F1>
<PP&E>                                                                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                   19,816,630
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            18,286,349<F1>
<BONDS>                                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                          2,982,795
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                             4,248,000
<PREFERRED>                                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                                                0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                     19,816,630
<SALES>                                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                    493,456
<CGS>                                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       495,872
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    739,793
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                    (742,209)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        252,351
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                (489,858)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                                       (588,093)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                          (.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                          (.33)
<FN>
<F1> Unclassified balance sheet
</FN>

</TABLE>
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3428 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain music boxes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 6, 2006 

Mr. DURBIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain music boxes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN MUSIC BOXES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.13.47 Music boxes with mechanical 

musical movements, presented in the immediate 

packaging for shipment to 

the ultimate purchaser, and 

each weighing not over 6 kg 

together with their retail 

packaging (provided for in 

subheading 9208.10.00) ...... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•S 3428 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS