alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----- Forwarded by Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/18/2011 03:16 PM

-----

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

To: Thomas Gillis/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, RobertJ

 Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 01/28/2011 11:06 AM

Subject: RE: E.O. 12866 Meeting on Boiler MACT

Hi all,

Consistent with E.O. 12866, attached is the handout provided by API at

the meeting today. Please let mek now if you have any questions.

Regards,

Cortney

-----Original Appointment-----

From: Echols, Mabel E.

Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 4:17 PM

To: Echols, Mabel E.; Neyland, Kevin F.; Mancini, Dominic J.; Higgins,

Cortney; Lee, Amanda I.; MacNeil, John S.; Rackoff, Jonathan E.;

tsirigotis.peter@epamail.epa.gov; wayland.robertj@epamail.epa.gov;

gillis.thomas@epa.gov

Subject: E.O. 12866 Meeting on Boiler MACT

When: Friday, January 28, 2011 10:00 AM-10:30 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern

Time (US & Canada).

Where: 10103 NEOB

When: Friday, January 28, 2011 10:00 AM-10:30 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern

Time (US & Canada).

Where: 10103 NEOB

Note: The GMT offset above does not reflect daylight saving time

adjustments.

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Khary Cauthen, API has requested this meeting.(See attached file:

Handout_Boilers_API_Jan282011.pdf)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

BEN F. BEARD, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv653-WHA

)

LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS, INC.,) 

etc., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Motion to Transfer or Reassign Case (Doc. #3), filed on July

28, 2006, and the Motion to Transfer Venue (Doc. #4), filed on August 1, 2006, it is

ORDERED that the Non-moving party shall show cause, if any there be, on or before

August 16, 2006 why the motions should not be granted. The motions will be taken under

submission on that day for determination without oral hearing.

DONE this 2nd day of August, 2006.

/s/ W. Harold Albritton 

W. HAROLD ALBRITTON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00653-WHA-CSC Document 5 Filed 08/02/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### § 930.33 Expenses and compensation.

Except for the public member and alternate public member who shall receive such compensation as the Board may establish and the Secretary may approve, the members of the Board, and alternates when acting as members, shall serve without compensation but shall be reimbursed for necessary and reasonable expenses, as approved by the Board, incurred by them in the performance of their duties under this part. The Board at its discretion may request the attendance of one or more alternates at any or all meetings, notwithstanding the expected or actual presence of the respective member(s), and may pay the expenses of such alternates.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph E. Dixon, Appellant.

Submitted July 9, 2007;

decided September 6, 2007

Reported below, 37 AD3d 1124.

*893Motion for an extension of the time within which to apply for permission to appeal pursuant to CPL 460.20 denied as unnecessary and motion papers treated as a timely CPL 460.20 application.
Index

Parent topic: Attachment 5601-1 Table Of Contents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

BARBARA M. JEFFERS, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 3:06-cv-685-WKW

)

RUSSELL COUNTY BOARD OF )

EDUCATION, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

BRIEFING ORDER

Upon consideration of Defendant Russell County Board of Education’s Motion for Summary

Judgment (Doc. # 39) filed on December 14, 2007, it is ORDERED that the motion be submitted

without oral argument on January 18, 2008.

It is further ORDERED that plaintiffs file a response which shall include a brief on or before

January 4, 2008. The Defendant may file a reply brief on or before January 18, 2008.

All future motions to remand, motions to dismiss, motions for judgment on the

pleadings, and motions for summary judgment filed in this case, it is ORDERED that:

1. The movant shall file its brief and any evidentiary submission simultaneously with

the filing of the dispositive motion.

2. The opponent’s response brief and any evidentiary submission shall be due 21 days

after the date the motion is filed.

3. The movant’s reply brief, if any, shall be due 14 days after the date the response

is filed.

Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 42 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 1 of 2
4. The motion shall be under submission on the due date of the reply brief. Unless the

court determines that a hearing is necessary or helpful, at which time a date will be set, the court will

determine the motion without oral argument upon submission. 

5. Briefs in support of or in opposition to any motion generally should not exceed

25 pages. In all cases in which briefs exceed 25 pages, counsel must include a table of contents

indicating the main sections of the brief, the principal arguments and citations to authority made in

each section, and the pages on which each section and any sub-sections may be found.

6. The parties are required to submit or mail a paper courtesy copy of briefs and

supporting evidence to the Chambers of the undersigned. 

7. For those submissions (including briefs and evidentiary materials) that exceed 25

pages, the paper courtesy copy shall be bound in a three-ring binder and tabbed.

8. Any discussion of evidence in a brief must include the specific reference, by name

or document number and by page and line, to where the evidence can be found in the supporting

evidentiary submission or in any document filed with the court.

9. Failure to comply strictly with this Order for all future filings may result in the

striking of the filing or other appropriate sanctions.

DONE this 14th day of December, 2007.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 42 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-mj-00073-DRB Document 5 Filed 07/27/2006 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.23


HYSTER-YALE MATERIALS HANDLING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES 
Director Fee Policy (Amended Effective as of January 1, 2018)






This Director fee policy shall apply to each Director of Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc.  (Hyster-Yale) or one of its subsidiaries, other than (i) Directors who are full-time employees of Hyster-Yale or one of its subsidiaries or (ii) Directors who have entered into separate written fee agreements authorized by the Board of Directors and executed by an authorized officer of Hyster-Yale or one of its subsidiaries.
 
Each Director of Hyster-Yale will receive an annual retainer, of $173,000, payable quarterly in arrears. Each quarterly payment shall consist of $15,000 in cash and $28,250 worth of Hyster-Yale Class A Common Stock, transfer of which is restricted pursuant to the terms of the Hyster-Yale Non-Employee Directors’ Equity Compensation Plan.  


Each Director of Hyster-Yale Group, Inc. who is not a Director of Hyster-Yale will receive an annual retainer of $20,000, payable in cash quarterly in arrears in installments of $5,000.


Each Chairman of a Committee of the Hyster-Yale Board of Directors will receive an additional annual Committee Chairman’s fee of $10,000, payable in cash quarterly in arrears in installments of $2,500; provided, however, that the Chairman of the Audit Review Committee will receive an annual Committee Chairman’s fee of $15,000, payable in cash quarterly in arrears in installments of $3,750.  100% of all fees paid for service as Chairman of a Committee is attributable to services for Hyster-Yale Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
 
Each member of a Committee (other than the Executive Committee) of the Hyster-Yale Board of Directors, including Committee Chairmen, will receive an additional annual Committee member’s fee of $7,000 for each Committee on which such Director serves, payable in cash quarterly in arrears in installments of $1,750.  100% of all fees paid for service as a member of a Committee is attributable to services for Hyster-Yale Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
 
Each Director of Hyster-Yale or a Hyster-Yale subsidiary will be paid a meeting fee of (a) $1,000 for each Hyster-Yale or subsidiary Board meeting attended, provided that no Director shall be paid for attendance at more than one Board meeting on any single day, and (b) $1,000 for each Committee meeting attended.  In the case of either joint meeting or joint committee meetings, the fees associated with that meeting will be allocated among the companies that actually met. 


This amended policy is effective as of January 1, 2018  








Director Fee Policy
 (Effective As of January 1, 2017)
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Logan CountyBancShares, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’sknowledge, that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterended March 31, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany. 

 
| Date: November 24, 2004 | /s/  Mark Mareske |                     |
|-------------------------|-------------------|--------------------------|
|                    | Name:             | Mark  Mareske            |
|                    | Title:            | Chief  Financial Officer |
|                    |              |                     |
|                         |                   |                          |  |

 

----
#### § 54.1009 Order of furnishing service.

Service under the regulations shall be furnished to applicants, insofar as practicable and subject to the availability of a qualified design review specialist, in the order in which requests therefor are received, insofar as consistent with good management, efficiency and economy. Precedence will be given, when necessary, to requests made by any government agency and to requests for appeal service under § 54.1021.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Authority:

7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 800.178 Summary revocation of licenses.

Licenses may be summarily revoked upon a finding that the licensee has been convicted of any offense either prohibited by section 13 of the Act or prohibited by Title 18 of the United States Code, with respect to the performance of services under the Act.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3104 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3104

To suspend temporarily the duty on numerous other seals made of rubber 
 or silicone, and covered with, or reinforced with, a fabric material.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

 Mr. Brownback introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on numerous other seals made of rubber 
 or silicone, and covered with, or reinforced with, a fabric material.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NUMEROUS OTHER SEALS MADE OF RUBBER OR SILICONE, AND COVERED 
              WITH, OR REINFORCED WITH, A FABRIC MATERIAL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.59.11        Numerous other seals    Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           made of rubber or                                                 31/2009          ''
                           silicone, and covered                                                               .
                           with, or reinforced
                           with, a fabric
                           material (provided
                           for in subheading
                           5911.90.00)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Thompson, Coe, Cousins & Irons, L.L.P. 

Attorneys and Counselors

701 Brazos | Suite 1500 | Austin, TX 78701 | (888) 708-8200 | Fax: (512) 708-8777

Wade C. Crosnoe

Direct Dial: (512) 703-5078

wcrosnoe@thompsoncoe.com

Board Certified in Civil Appellate Law

Texas Board of Legal Specialization

Austin

Dallas

Houston

Los Angeles

Saint Paul

February 17, 2015 

Jeffrey D. Kyle, Clerk Via E-Filing

Court of Appeals 

Third District of Texas

P. O. Box 12547 

Austin, Texas 78711-2547 

Re: No. 03-14-00660-CV, Craig Zgabay and Tammy Zgabay v. NBRC Property 

Owners Assoc., in the Third District Court of Appeals at Austin

Dear Mr. Kyle:

I am writing to acknowledge receipt of the Court’s February 6, 2015 letter notifying 

counsel of the oral argument scheduled for March 25, 2015 at 1:30 p.m. I will present oral 

argument on behalf of Appellee NBRC Property Owners Association. 

Thank you for your attention to this matter. 

Very truly yours,

/s/ Wade Crosnoe 

Wade C. Crosnoe 

WCC:lbm

cc: Via E-service or E-mail

J. Patrick Sutton 

1706 W. 10th Street 

Austin, Texas 78703 

E-Mail: jpatricksutton@jpatricksuttonlaw.com

Counsel for Appellants

2155415v1

05049.028

ACCEPTED

03-14-00660-CV

4175563

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

2/17/2015 1:00:01 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 2/17/2015 1:00:01 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

 NORTHERN DIVISION 

ANTHONY BERNARD MOORER, ) 

Plaintiff, ) 

) 

v. ) Case No. 2:06-CV-672-WKW 

) 

CITY OF MONTGOMERY; ) 

BERNARD HARRIS, individually; and ) 

THOMAS PROVITT, individually, ) 

Defendants. ) 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

COME NOW Defendants City of Montgomery, Bernard Harris and Thomas 

Provitt, pursuant to Rule 56(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and move this 

Court for summary judgment in Defendants’ favor and against Plaintiff Anthony Bernard 

Moorer as to all issues in controversy alleged against Defendants, and in support of this 

motion state: 

Defendants submit that there are no genuine issues as to any material facts, and 

that they are entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Defendants further submit that 

Plaintiff has failed to present evidence to support elements of his case, on which he bears 

the ultimate burden of proof. 

In support of the Motion for Summary Judgment, Defendants submit: 

1. Defendants’ Answer (Doc. 15); and 

2. Brief in Support of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, with the 

following attached exhibits: 

Defendant’s Exhibit A – Affidavit of Bernard Harris; 

Defendant’s Exhibit B – Affidavit of Thomas Provitt; and 

Defendant’s Exhibit C – Certified Copy of Order, Montgomery Circuit 

Case 2:06-cv-00672-WKW-WC Document 24 Filed 11/16/2007 Page 1 of 3
Court Case No. CV-2006-3015. 

To the extent permitted by the Court, Defendant reserves the right to supplement 

this motion if necessary. 

Respectfully submitted this 16th day of November, 2007. 

/s/ Allison H. Highley .

Allison H. Highley (HIG024) 

Counsel for Defendants 

OF COUNSEL: 

CITY OF MONTGOMERY 

Legal Department 

Post Office Box 1111 

Montgomery, AL 36101-1111 

(334) 241-2050 Telephone 

(334) 241-2310 Facsimile 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on November 16, 2007, I sent a copy of the foregoing motion 

to the Plaintiff via U.S. mail, first-class postage pre-paid to: 

Anthony Moorer 

4240 Green Meadow Drive 

Montgomery, Alabama 36108 

/s/ Allison H. Highley .

Allison H. Highley (HIG024) 

Case 2:06-cv-00672-WKW-WC Document 24 Filed 11/16/2007 Page 2 of 3
APPENDIX A 

EVIDENCE 

APPENDIX B 

STATUTES 

REGULATIONS 

CASE LAW 

NOTES 

ARTICLES 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY 

Case 2:06-cv-00672-WKW-WC Document 24 Filed 11/16/2007 Page 3 of 3
**Exhibit 31.2**

** **

**WAMU ASSET ACCEPTANCE CORP.**

** **

**RESTATED OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

 

I, Thomas G. Lehmann, certify that:

1.         I have reviewed this report on Form 10–K and all reports on Form 10–D required to be filed in respect of theperiod covered by this report on Form 10–K of Washington Mutual Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, WMALT Series 2006-9 Trust (the ‘‘Exchange Act periodic reports’’);

2.         Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement ofa  material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.         Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form10–D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.         Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB,and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material respects; and

5.         All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their relatedattestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a–18 and 15d–18 have been included as anexhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10–K. 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: None.

 

 

Date:  As of March 15,2007

|   |   | /s/ Thomas G. Lehmann                                                                        |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Name:  ThomasG. Lehmann                                                                 |
|   |   | Title:   President and Senior Officer in Charge of Securitization of the Depositor |
409.503 Waiver.

(a) The HCA, on a non-delegable basis, is authorized to waive any general rule or procedure in FAR

9.5 when in the Government's interest.

(b) Each request for waiver shall include:

(1) The general rule or procedure proposed to be waived;

(2) An analysis of the potential conflict, including the benefits and detriments to the Government and

prospective contractors;

(3) A discussion of why the conflict cannot be avoided, neutralized, or mitigated; and

(4) Advice of counsel obtained under FAR 9.504(b).

Parent topic: Subpart 409.5 - Organizational and Consultant Conflicts of Interest
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3032 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain nickel alloy wire. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 24, 2006 

Mr. DEWINE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain nickel alloy wire. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NICKEL ALLOY WIRE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.75.05 Nickel alloy wire, of a kind used in the 

manufacture of certain spark plug electrodes (provided for in subheading 

7505.22.10) ............................................. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 3032 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
#### § 622.6 Equal opportunity.

The Pub. L. 83-566 and Pub. L. 78-534 programs will be conducted in compliance with all requirements respecting nondiscrimination as contained in the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, and in the regulations of the Secretary of Agriculture (7 CFR Part 15), which provide that no person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color, national origin, sex, age, handicap, or religion be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity conducted or assisted by the Department of Agriculture.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

SHELDON LEE HUTCHINS,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:20cv5952/MCR/ZCB

DAVID MICHAEL ROWELL, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________/

ORDER

The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation on August 21, 

2023. (Doc.124). The Court furnished the parties a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, 

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The deadline for filing objections has passed 

with no objections filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the record, I have 

determined the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 124) is 

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The motions to dismiss filed by Defendants (Docs. 44, 56, 81) are

GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows:

Case 3:20-cv-05952-MCR-ZCB Document 144 Filed 09/30/23 Page 1 of 2
2

a. The motions to dismiss (Docs. 44, 56, 81) are GRANTED as to 

Plaintiff’s official capacity claims against all Defendants;

b. The motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Schultz and Rowell 

(Doc. 44) are GRANTED as to Plaintiff’s individual capacity claims that 

Defendants Schultz and Rowell used excessive force, but be DENIED as to 

Plaintiff’s individual capacity claims that Defendants Schultz and Rowell failed to 

intervene;

c. The motions to dismiss filed by Defendants Hays, Campbell, 

Pendleton, and Nowlin (Docs. 44, 56, 81) are DENIED as to Plaintiff’s individual 

capacity excessive force and failure to intervene claims.

3. This case is recommitted to the Magistrate Judge for further 

proceedings.

DONE AND ORDERED this 30th day of September 2023.

M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-05952-MCR-ZCB Document 144 Filed 09/30/23 Page 2 of 2