alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 981.455 Interhandler transfers. ( a ) *Transfers of almonds.* Interhandler transfers of almonds pursuant to § 981.55 shall be reported to the Board on ABC Form 7. The report shall contain the following information: ( 1 ) Date of transfer;
( 2 ) The names, and plant locations of both the transferring and receiving handlers;
( 3 ) The variety of almonds transferred;
( 4 ) Whether the almonds are shelled or unshelled;
( 5 ) The name of the handler assuming reserve and assessment obligations on the almonds transferred;
( 6 ) Whether the almonds had been treated to achieve a 4-log reduction in *Salmonella* bacteria, pursuant to § 981.442(b); and
( 7 ) A unique handler identification number for each lot.
( b ) *Transfers of reserve credits.* A handler may transfer reserve credits to another handler after having filed with the Board, in accordance with § 981.474, a completed ABC Form 13/14 covering the almonds to be diverted to a noncompetitive outlet and all the documentation applicable thereto. Such a transfer does not relieve the transferring handler of any reserve obligations for the applicable crop year. The transferred credit shall not exceed the quantity needed by the receiving handler to cover that handler's reserve obligation. The Board shall complete the transfer upon receipt of an ABC Form 11 executed by both handlers. No transfer of reserve credits shall be made to satisfy a handler's inedible disposition obligation incurred pursuant to § 981.42(a).
( c ) *Transfers of reserve withholding obligation.* A handler may transfer reserve withholding obligation to other handlers pursuant to § 981.55 after having filed with the Board an ABC Form 11 executed by both handlers. The Board shall approve the transfer upon receipt of the properly completed form.
( d ) Transfer of inedible obligation may be made, with the approval of the Board, only when the inedible kernels are physically transferred with the entire lot of almonds. The transfer of the lot shall be reported on ABC Form 9, showing date of transfer and, for the transferring handler, the ( 1 ) original inspection certificate number,
( 2 ) total weight shown on the certificate, and
( 3 ) weight of inedible kernels shown on the certificate. For the receiving handler, ABC Form 9 shall show the (1) new inspection certificate number, (2) total weight shown on the certificate, and (3) weight of inedible kernels shown on the certificate. ABC Form 9 shall be signed by both, the transferring handler and the receiving handler, and submitted by the receiving handler to the Board for approval.
[42 FR 19322, Apr. 13, 1977, as amended at 44 FR 30076, May 24, 1979; 56 FR 19794, Apr. 30, 1991; 62 FR 56051, Oct. 29, 1997; 72 FR 51992, Sept. 12, 2007]
Subpart 5625.1 - BUY AMERICAN ACT

SUPPLIES

Parent topic: Part 5625 - FOREIGN ACQUISITION

5625.103 Exceptions.

Where throughout DFARS 225.103 the approval level is stated as Head of Agency (HOA) or Head of

Contracting Activity (HCA), the approval authority for USSOCOM is the Director of Procurement

(DOP).
#### § 958.12 Fiscal period.

*Fiscal period* means the period beginning and ending on the dates approved by the Secretary pursuant to recommendations by the committee.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                                                5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                         1,000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                  67
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          850
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                            113
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     1,378
<PP&E>                                                 214
<DEPRECIATION>                                          43
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       8,997
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                4,022
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            10,260
<OTHER-SE>                                          (5,286)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         8,997
<SALES>                                              5,955
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     5,955
<CGS>                                                4,848
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      38
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (1,887)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (1,887)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (1,887)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.25)



</TABLE>
Case 2:06-cv-00672-WKW-WC Document 13 Filed 02/09/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00672-WKW-WC Document 13 Filed 02/09/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00672-WKW-WC Document 13 Filed 02/09/2007 Page 3 of 3
| (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and                                                                        |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
| (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. |

| Date: April 14, 2010                           |   |   |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                                          |   |   |   |   |
| /s/ Douglas A. McClain, Jr.                                   |   |   |   |   |
| Douglas A. McClain, Jr.Chief Financial and Accounting Officer |   |   |   |   |
IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

WILLIAM D. BOWDEN, *

Plaintiff, *

vs. * CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06-CV-665

MISSION PETROLEUM CARRIERS, et al., *

Defendants. *

DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF FILING RESPONSES

TO PLAINTIFF’S CONSOLIDATED DISCOVERY

Defendants Mission Petroleum Carriers and Antonio Martinez Navarro hereby give notice

of filing responses to Plaintiff’s Consolidated Discovery.

Respectfully submitted on the 23rd day of August, 2006.

/s/ Caroline T. Pryor 

VINCENT A. NOLETTO, JR. 

(NOLEV3868)

CAROLINE T. PRYOR (PRYOC2802)

Attorney for Defendants

CARR ALLISON

7101 Highway 90, Suite 402

Post Office Box 1126

Daphne, Alabama 36526

(251)626-9340 telephone

(251)626-8928 facsimile

ctp@carrallison.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have on this 23rd of August, 2006, served a copy of the foregoing

pleading upon all counsel of record via the Court’s electronic filing system.

James Bodin, Esq.

McPhillips, Shinbaum & Gill, LLP

P.O. Box 64

Montgomery, AL 36101-0064

/s/ Caroline T. Pryor 

CAROLINE T. PRYOR

Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 9 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 1 of 1
§ 948.130 Application for exemption certificates. Any producer applying for exemption from any grade and size regulation issued under § 948.22 shall make application to the respective area committee for the area in which the applicant's potatoes were grown or are stored, on forms to be furnished by the area committee. The application shall include: ( a ) The name and address of the applicant;
( b ) The location, or locations, of the potatoes with respect to which exemption is requested;
( c ) The total estimated quantity of potatoes (excluding culls) produced by the applicant during the current season, stated in hundredweights, by varieties, grades, and sizes;
( d ) The estimated percentage of the applicant's potato crop (excluding culls) which cannot be shipped because of grade and size regulations then in effect and the acts beyond his control or reasonable expectation adversely affecting his potatoes;
( e ) The quantity of potatoes of each variety (excluding culls) which has already been sold or otherwise shipped during the current season;
( f ) The signature of the applicant and certification that the statements given in the application are true and correct; and
( g ) Such additional information as the area committee may find necessary in making a determination regarding the granting of an exemption certificate.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

§ 810.2205 Special grades and special grade requirements. ( a ) *Ergoty wheat.* Wheat that contains more than 0.05 percent of ergot.
( b ) *Garlicky wheat.* Wheat that contains in a 1,000 gram portion more than two green garlic bulblets or an equivalent quantity of dry or partly dry bulblets.
( c ) *Light smutty wheat.* Wheat that has an unmistakable odor of smut, or which contains, in a 250-gram portion, smut balls, portions of smut balls, or spores of smut in excess of a quantity equal to 5 smut balls, but not in excess of a quantity equal to 30 smut balls of average size.
( d ) *Smutty wheat.* Wheat that contains, in a 250 gram portion, smut balls, portions of smut balls, or spores of smut in excess of a quantity equal to 30 smut balls of average size.
( e ) *Treated wheat.* Wheat that has been scoured, limed, washed, sulfured, or treated in such a manner that the true quality is not reflected by either the numerical grades or the U.S. Sample grade designation alone.
[52 FR 24418, June 30, 1987, as amended at 52 FR 24442, June 30, 1987; 57 FR 58967, Dec. 14, 1992]
5228.9003 Insurance policies.

(a) Insurance policies for leased property shall be issued in the names of the lessee and of the

Department of the Navy and contain a loss payable provision as follows: "Loss, if any, under this

policy shall be adjusted with (Lessee) and the proceeds, at the election of the Government, shall be

payable to the (Lessee); any proceeds not paid to the (Lessee) shall be payable to the Treasurer of

the United States."

(b) Each insurance policy shall contain a provision for thirty days prior notice to DASN(P) in the

event of cancellation of the policy.

(c) A certificate of insurance or copy of each insurance policy shall be deposited with DASN(P) via

hardcopy or by email at usn.pentagon.asstsecnavrdadc.mbx.pabt@us.navy.mil with the subject

“[Activity Name] FAR 28.9003 – Insurance Policy Deposit.”

Parent topic: Subpart 5228.90 - INSURANCE UNDER LEASES
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Adonis Henry, Appellant.

[815 NYS2d 209]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ferdinand, J), rendered May 12, 2004, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

While on probation for two drug-related felonies, the defendant was arrested and indicted for selling heroin to an undercover officer within 1,000 feet of a school. He subsequently entered a plea of guilty to one count of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree in full satisfaction of the indictment. The court promised that if he successfully completed a DTAP program (Drug Treatment Alternative-to-Prison Program), the plea would be vacated and the indictment would be dismissed. The court warned, however, that if he failed to complete the program, he would face a sentence of 4V2 to 9 years’ imprisonment as a second felony offender. The defendant was fully allocuted and, upon his admission, was adjudicated a second felony offender. He was subsequently discharged from one residential drug treatment program for noncompliance, and left a second residential program without permission and against clinical advice. He was thereafter arrested for another drug sale. The court sentenced him to a term of 4V2 to 9 years’ imprisonment.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal from the sentence imposed was ineffective *(see People v Brown,*13 AD3d 548 [2004]; *People v Williams,*258 AD2d 544 [1999]; *People v Rose,*236 AD2d 637 [1997]; *People v Rolon,*220 AD2d 543 [1995]). Contrary to the defendant’s contention, however, the sentence was neither unconstitutional nor excessive *(see People v Moore,*261 AD2d 421 [1999]; *People v James,*251 AD2d 208 [1998]; *People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Adams, J.P., Goldstein, Fisher and Lifson, JJ., concur.
#### STANTON, Respondent, v. GENERAL ACCIDENT ASSUR. CORP., Limited, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

May 16, 1906.)

Action by John Stanton against the óeneral Accident Assurance Corporation, limited, etc.

PER CURIAM.

Motion to dismiss appeal `granted, with $10 costs, unless the appellant shall, within 20 days from the date of service of a copy of this order, together with notice of entry thereof, file and sert~e the printed papers on appeal, as provided by rule 41, and pay to the respondent's attorney $10 costs of this motion, and, at the option of the respondent, submit said a~peal, as of the present term, upon such printed papers; in which event the motion is denied.
52.247-47 Evaluation-F.o.b. Origin.

As prescribed in 47.305-3(f)(2), insert the following provision. When it is appropriate to use methods

other than land transportation in evaluating offers; e.g.,air, pipeline, barge, or ocean tanker, modify

the provision accordingly.

Evaluation-F.o.b. Origin (June 2003)

(a) The Government normally uses land methods of transportation by regulated common carrier for

shipment within the contiguous United States.

(b) To evaluate offers, the Government will consider only these methods to establish the cost of

transportation between offeror’s shipping point and destination (tentative or firm, whichever is

applicable) in the contiguous United States.

(c) This transportation cost will be added to the offer price to determine the Government’s overall

cost.

(d) When tentative destinations are indicated, the Government will use them only for evaluation

purposes. The Government has the right to use any other means of transportation or any other

destination at the time of shipment.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.247 [Reserved]
§ 650.5 Environmental evaluation in planning. ( a ) *General.* Environmental evaluation (EE) integrates environmental concerns throughout the planning, installation, and operation of NRCS-assisted projects. The EE applies to all assistance provided by NRCS, but planning intensity, public involvement, and documentation of actions vary according to the scope of the action. NRCS begins consideration of environmental concerns when information gathered during the environmental evaluation is used: ( 1 ) To identify environmental concerns that may be affected, gather baseline data, and predict effects of alternative courses of actions;
( 2 ) To provide data to applicants for use in establishing objectives commensurate with the scope and complexity of the proposed action;
( 3 ) To assist in the development of alternative courses of action; (40 CFR 1502.14). In NRCS-assisted project actions, nonstructural, water conservation, and other alternatives that are in keeping with the Water Resources Council's Principles and Standards are considered, if appropriate.
( 4 ) To perform other related investigations and analyses as needed, including economic evaluation, engineering investigations, etc.
( 5 ) To assist in the development of detailed plans for implementation and operation and maintenance.
( b ) *Procedures.* NRCS's Guide for Environmental Assessment issued in March 1977 and published in the Federal Register on August 8, 1977, provides guidance for conducting an environmental evaluation. (42 FR 40123-40167).
( c ) *Decision points.* Figure 1 illustrates the decision points for compliance with NEPA in NRCS decisionmaking.
[44 FR 50579, Aug. 29, 1979, as amended at 73 FR 35884, June 25, 2008]
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 16 Filed 09/21/2006 Page 1 of 9
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 16 Filed 09/21/2006 Page 2 of 9
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 16 Filed 09/21/2006 Page 3 of 9
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 16 Filed 09/21/2006 Page 4 of 9
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 16 Filed 09/21/2006 Page 5 of 9
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 16 Filed 09/21/2006 Page 6 of 9
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 16 Filed 09/21/2006 Page 7 of 9
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 16 Filed 09/21/2006 Page 8 of 9
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 16 Filed 09/21/2006 Page 9 of 9
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

       
<S>                                      <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      4,887,503
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                               3,195,689
<ALLOWANCES>                                  512,824
<INVENTORY>                                 3,074,333
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           11,366,844
<PP&E>                                      5,580,694
<DEPRECIATION>                              2,251,042
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             56,679,256
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       5,836,295
<BONDS>                                             0
<COMMON>                                      259,969
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                 26,219,232
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               56,679,256
<SALES>                                     3,799,473
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            3,799,473
<CGS>                                       3,987,333
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               3,987,333
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            8,769,260
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               68,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            493,691
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            14,899,340
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        14,899,340
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                               14,899,340
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .60
        


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-41368

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CARLOS CASTILLO-HERNANDEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. M-99-CR-342-2

--------------------

June 13, 2000

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Carlos

Castillo-Hernandez (“Castillo”) has moved for leave to withdraw

and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967). Castillo has received a copy of counsel’s

motion and brief, but has not filed a response. Our independent

review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
No. 99-41368

-2-

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th

Cir. R. 42.2.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION

TERRY DEESE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 1:06cv643-MHT

) 

CHAMPION ENTERPRISES, )

INC., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion to strike (Doc. No. 57)

is set for submission, without oral argument, on December

17, 2007, with all briefs due by said date.

DONE, this the 27th day of November, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 59 Filed 11/27/2007 Page 1 of 1
52.232-6 Payment under Communication Service Contracts with Common Carriers.       As prescribed in 32.111(a)(6), insert the following clause, appropriately modified with respect to payment due dates in accordance with agency regulations, in solicitations and contracts for regulated communication services by common carriers:          Payment under Communication Service Contracts with Common Carriers (Apr 1984)          The Government shall pay the Contractor, in arrears, upon submission of invoices for services and facilities furnished in accordance with the terms of CSAs issued under this contract, the rates and charges for the services and facilities as set forth in the clause entitled "Rates, Charges and Services."          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.232 [Reserved]
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Authority:

7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 810.1803 Basis of determination.

Each determination of heat-damaged kernels, damaged kernels, test weight per bushel, and dehulled seed is made on the basis of the grain when free from foreign material. Other determinations not specifically provided for in the general provisions are made on the basis of the grain as a whole, except the determination of odor is made on either the basis of the grain as a whole or the grain when free from foreign material.
ANNEX 13 - [RESERVED]
#### In the Matter of Thomas J. Valentine, Respondent, v. Barbara A. Praete et al., Respondents, and Michael Di Roma, Appellant.

In a proceeding to invalidate petitions designating appellant and respondent Praete as candidates in the Republican Party Primary Election to be held on June 17, 1969 for the Party position of member of the Westchester Republican County Committee from the 16th Election District of the 1st Ward of the City of New Rochelle, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered June 10, 1969, which *inter alia*invalidated appellant’s designating petitions. Order affirmed insofar as it invalidated appellant’s designating petitions, without costs. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Rabin, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.