alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 906.8 Producer. *Producer* means any person engaged in a proprietary capacity in the production of fruit for market. ( a ) *Independent producer. Independent producer* means any producer who does not market his fruit through a handler that is a cooperative marketing organization.
( b ) [Reserved]
§ 925.55 Inspection and certification. ( a ) Whenever the handling of any variety of grapes is regulated pursuant to § 925.52, each handler who handles grapes shall, prior thereto, cause such grapes to be inspected by the Federal or Federal-State Inspection Service and certified as meeting the applicable requirements of such regulation: *Provided,* That inspection and certification shall not be required for grapes which previously have been so inspected and certified if such prior inspection was performed within such period as may be established pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section. Promptly after the inspection and certification each such handler shall submit, or cause to be submitted, to the committee a copy of the certificate of inspection issued with respect to such grapes.
( b ) The committee may, with the approval of the Secretary, establish a period prior to shipment during which the inspection required by this section must be performed.
( c ) The committee may enter into an agreement with the Federal and Federal-State Inspection Services with respect to the costs of the inspection required by paragraph (a) of this section, and may collect from handlers their respective pro rata share of such costs.
216.601 Time–and–materials contracts.

(d)(i)(A)(1)(i) The Chief of the Contracting Office is the senior contracting official within the

contracting activity.

Parent topic: SUBPART 16.5 –– INDEFINITE–DELIVERY CONTRACTS
5611.602 General.

(Revised Ju ne 202 1 )

(c)

(1) USSOCOM is a Delegated Agency in accordance with Schedule I of the Defense Production

Allocation System, Department of Commerce Regulation 15 CFR 700 . This delegation gives

USSOCOM the authority to place Defense Priorities and Allocations System (DPAS) rated orders in

support of authorized programs.

(2) The USSOCOM DPAS Officer is the SOF AT&L-KM Policy Chief. The DPAS Officer serves as the

focal point for all DPAS matters.

HQ, United States Special Operations Command

Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L-K)

SOFARS 5611

February 2007

Parent topic: Subpart 5611.6 - PRIORITIES AND ALLOCATIONS
#### § 930.2 Board.

*Board* means the Cherry Industry Administrative Board established pursuant to § 930.20.
Case 3:06-cv-00631-MHT-VPM Document 1 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 1 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00631-MHT-VPM Document 1 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 2 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00631-MHT-VPM Document 1 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 3 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00631-MHT-VPM Document 1 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 4 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00631-MHT-VPM Document 1 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 5 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00631-MHT-VPM Document 1 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 6 of 6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

LEROY WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff,

v.

STATE OF ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF

TRANSPORTATION, JOE MCINNES, etc.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 2:06-cv-658-ID-TFM

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff Leroy Williams and Defendants State of Alabama Department of Transportation

and Joe McInnes (hereinafter “the parties”) jointly notify the Court that the terms and conditions

of the Settlement Agreement and Release, heretofore filed with this Court, have been satisfied

and the issues in this matter have been resolved. (See Doc. No. 54.)

WHEREFORE, the parties jointly move this Court for an order dismissing this case with

prejudice.

Respectfully submitted this 1st day of November 2007.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED

TROY KING

ATTORNEY GENERAL

s/ Andrew W. Redd

Jim R. Ippolito, Jr. (IPP001)

Assistant Attorney General

Chief Counsel

Andrew W. Redd (RED001)

R. Mitchell Alton, III (ALT003)

Assistant Attorneys General

Assistant Counsel

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS

Case 2:06-cv-00658-TFM Document 57 Filed 11/01/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

ADDRESS OF COUNSEL:

State of Alabama Department of Transportation

1409 Coliseum Boulevard

Montgomery, Alabama 36110

Telephone: (334) 242-6350

Facsimile: (334) 264-4359

redda@dot.state.al.us

s/ Russell W. Adams

Russell W. Adams (ADA041)

Attorney at Law

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

ADDRESS OF COUNSEL:

WIGGINS, CHILDS, QUINN & PANTAZIS, P.C.

301 Nineteenth Street, North

Birmingham, Alabama 35203

(205) 314-0500 (office)

(205) 254-1500 (facsimile)

RAdams@wcqp.com

Case 2:06-cv-00658-TFM Document 57 Filed 11/01/2007 Page 2 of 2
252.208-7000 Intent to Furnish Precious

Metals as Government-Furnished Material.

As prescribed in 208.7305 (a), use the following clause:

INTENT TO FURNISH PRECIOUS METALS AS GOVERNMENT-FURNISHED MATERIAL (DEC 1991)

(a) The Government intends to furnish precious metals required in the manufacture of items to be

delivered under the contract if the Contracting Officer determines it to be in the Government's best

interest. The use of Government-furnished silver is mandatory when the quantity required is one

hundred troy ounces or more. The precious metal(s) will be furnished pursuant to the Government

Furnished Property clause of the contract.

(b) The Offeror shall cite the type (silver, gold, platinum, palladium, iridium, rhodium, and

ruthenium) and quantity in whole troy ounces of precious metals required in the performance of this

contract (including precious metals required for any first article or production sample), and shall

specify the national stock number (NSN) and nomenclature, if known, of the deliverable item

requiring precious metals.

Precious Metal* Quantity

Deliverable

Item

(NSN and

Nomenclature)

____________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________

*If platinum or palladium, specify whether sponge or granules are required.

(c) Offerors shall submit two prices for each deliverable item which contains precious metals—one

based on the Government furnishing precious metals, and one based on the Contractor furnishing

precious metals. Award will be made on the basis which is in the best interest of the Government.
(d) The Contractor agrees to insert this clause, including this paragraph (d), in solicitations for

subcontracts and purchase orders issued in performance of this contract, unless the Contractor

knows that the item being purchased contains no precious metals.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 252.208 RESERVED
Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 13 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 1 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 13 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 2 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 13 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 3 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 13 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 4 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 13 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 5 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 13 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 6 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 13 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 7 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 13 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 8 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 13 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 9 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 13 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 10 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 13 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 11 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 13 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 12 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 13 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 13 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 13 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 14 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 13 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 15 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 13 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 16 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 13 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 17 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 13 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 18 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 13 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 19 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 13 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 20 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 13 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 21 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 13 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 22 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 13 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 23 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 13 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 24 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 13 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 25 of 25
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 04-1930

___________

Terry Jordan, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Iowa Quality Beef, * Northern District of Iowa.

*

Appellee. * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

___________

Submitted: August 5, 2004

Filed: October 12, 2004

___________

Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Terry Jordan appeals the district court’s preservice dismissal of his complaint

for failure to state a claim. Jordan, who is African-American, alleged he was rehired

by Iowa Quality Beef; on the day he was to start work he was informed the offer of

rehire was rescinded; and the decision not to rehire him was based upon his race and

other impermissible factors. 

We grant Jordan leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Having carefully reviewed

the record, we conclude preservice dismissal was inappropriate because Jordan’s pro

se complaint, liberally construed, satisfied federal pleading requirements by providing
-2-

Iowa Quality Beef notice of his claim of discrimination in its decision not to rehire

him. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2); Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N.A., 534 U.S. 506, 514-15

(2002); Smith v. St. Bernards Reg’l Med. Ctr., 19 F.3d 1254, 1255 (8th Cir. 1994).

Accordingly, we reverse the dismissal and remand for further proceedings in

accordance with this opinion.

______________________________
ex10-1.htm


    Exhibit 10.1

     

    FIVE STAR QUALITY CARE,
INC.

     

    Summary of
Director Compensation

     

    The following is a summary of the
currently effective compensation of the directors of Five Star Quality Care,
Inc. (the “Company”) for services as directors, which is
subject to modification at any time by the Board of
Directors.

     

     

    
      
        
          
            
              	
                      ·

                    	
                      Each independent director receives
      an annual fee of $30,000, plus a fee of $500 for each meeting attended. Up
      to two $500 fees are payable if a board meeting and one or more board committee
      meetings are held on the same date.

                    
	 	 
	
                      ·

                    	
                      The chairpersons of the quality of
      care committee, the audit committee, the compensation committee and the
      nominating and governance committee, each of whom is an independent
      director, receive an
      additional annual fee of $12,500, $10,000, $3,500 and $3,500,
      respectively.

                    
	 	 
	
                      ·

                    	
                      Each director is entitled to
      receive a grant of 7,500 of the Company’s common shares on the date of the
      first board meeting following each annual meeting of shareholders
      (or, for directors
      who are first elected or appointed at other times, on the day of the first
      board meeting attended).

                    
	 	 
	
                      ·

                    	
                      The Company generally reimburses
      all directors for travel expenses incurred in connection with their duties
      as
directors.
#### Henry Hoffman, Appellant, *v.*William S. Marrin et al., Respondents.

(Argued June 17, 1884 ;

decided June 24, 1884.)

*Samuel Hand*for appellant.

*Joseph J. Marrvn*for respondents.

Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion.

All concur.

Appeal dismissed.
#### § 760.1717 Assignment.

No assignment will be made of any milk loss payment due or to come due under the regulations in this subpart. Any assignment or attempted assignment of any indemnity payment due or to come due under this subpart will be null and void.

[84 FR 48534, Sept. 13, 2019. Redesignated at 88 FR 62290, Sept. 11, 2023]
§ 766.105 Agency consideration of servicing requests. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 65044 , Aug. 8, 2024.
( a ) *Order in which Agency considers servicing options.* The Agency will consider loan servicing options and combinations of options to maximize loan repayment and minimize losses to the Agency. The Agency will consider loan servicing options in the following order for each eligible borrower who requests servicing: ( 1 ) Conservation Contract, if requested;
( 2 ) Consolidation and rescheduling or reamortization;
( 3 ) Deferral;
( 4 ) Writedown; and
( 5 ) Current market value buyout.
( b ) *Debt service margin.* ( 1 ) The Agency will attempt to achieve a 110 percent debt service margin for the servicing options listed in paragraphs (a)(2) through (4) of this section.
( 2 ) If the borrower cannot develop a feasible plan with the 110 percent debt service margin, the Agency will reduce the debt service margin by one percent and reconsider all available servicing authorities. This process will be repeated until a feasible plan has been developed or it has been determined that a feasible plan is not possible with a 100 percent margin.
( 3 ) The borrower must be able to develop a feasible plan with at least a 100 percent debt service margin to be considered for the servicing options listed in paragraphs (a)(1) through (4) of this section.
( c ) *Appraisal of borrower's assets.* The Agency will obtain an appraisal on: ( 1 ) All Agency security, non-essential assets, and real property unencumbered by the Agency that does not meet the criteria established in § 766.112(b), when: ( i ) A writedown is required to develop a feasible plan;
( ii ) The borrower will be offered current market value buyout.
( 2 ) The borrower's non-essential assets when their net recovery value may be adequate to bring the delinquent loans current.
H-106 Subsequent to fact-finding.       (a) Written findings of fact will be prepared by the fact-finder as mandated by FAR 9.406-3(d)(2)(i) and 9.407-3(d)(2)(i).          (b) The fact-finder will determine the disputed fact(s) by a preponderance of the evidence. A copy of the findings of fact will be provided to the debarring and suspending official, the Government’s representative, and the contractor.          (c) The debarring and suspending official will determine whether to continue the suspension or to debar the contractor based upon the entire administrative record, including the findings of fact.          (d) Prompt written notice of the debarring and suspending official’s decision will be sent to the contractor and any affiliates involved, in compliance with FAR 9.406-3(e) and 9.407-3(d)(4).    **Parent topic:** APPENDIX H - DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION PROCEDURES
§ 766.351 Liquidation. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 65045 , Aug. 8, 2024.
( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) When a borrower cannot or will not meet a loan obligation, the Agency will consider liquidating the borrower's account in accordance with this subpart.
( 2 ) The Agency will charge protective advances against the borrower's account as necessary to protect the Agency's interests during liquidation in accordance with § 765.203 of this chapter.
( 3 ) When no surviving family member or third party assumes or repays a deceased borrower's loan in accordance with part 765, subpart J, of this chapter, or when the estate does not otherwise fully repay or sell loan security to repay a deceased borrower's FLP loans, the Agency will liquidate the security as quickly as possible in accordance with State and local requirements.
( b ) *Liquidation for Program borrowers.* ( 1 ) If the borrower does not apply, does not accept, or is not eligible for primary loan servicing, conservation contract, market value buyout or homestead protection, and all administrative appeals are concluded, the Agency will accelerate the borrower's account in accordance with §§ 766.355 and 766.356, as appropriate.
( 2 ) Borrowers may voluntarily liquidate their security in accordance with §§ 766.352, 766.353 and 766.354. In such case, the Agency will: ( i ) Not delay involuntary liquidation action.
( ii ) Notify the borrower in accordance with subpart C of this part, prior to acting on the request for voluntary liquidation, if the conditions of paragraph (b)(1) of this section have not been met.
( c ) *Liquidation for Non-program borrowers.* If a borrower has both program and Non-program loans, the borrower's account will be handled in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section. If a borrower with only Non-program loans is in default, the borrower may liquidate voluntarily, subject to the following: ( 1 ) The Agency may delay involuntary liquidation actions when in the Agency's financial interest for a period not to exceed 60 days.
( 2 ) The borrower must obtain the Agency's consent prior to the sale of the property.
( 3 ) If the borrower will not pay the Agency in full, the minimum sales price must be the market value of the property as determined by the Agency.
( 4 ) The Agency will accept a conveyance offer only when it is in the Agency's financial interest.
( 5 ) If a Non-program borrower does not cure the default, or cannot or will not voluntarily liquidate, the Agency will accelerate the loan.
225.7002-1 Restrictions.

(a) The following restrictions implement 10 U.S.C. 4862 (the “Berry Amendment”). Except as

provided in subsection 225.7002-2 , do not acquire—

(1) Any of the following items, either as end products or components, unless the items have been

grown, reprocessed, reused, or produced in the United States:

(i) Food.

(ii) Clothing and the materials and components thereof, other than sensors, electronics, or other

items added to, and not normally associated with, clothing and the materials and components

thereof. Clothing includes items such as outerwear, headwear, underwear, nightwear, footwear,

hosiery, handwear, belts, badges, and insignia. For additional guidance and examples, see PGI

225.7002-1 (a)(1)(ii).

(iii)(A) Tents and the structural components of tents;

(B) Tarpaulins; or

(C) Covers.

(iv) Cotton and other natural fiber products.

(v) Woven silk or woven silk blends.

(vi) Spun silk yarn for cartridge cloth.

(vii) Synthetic fabric or coated synthetic fabric, including all textile fibers and yarns that are for use

in such fabrics.

(viii) Canvas products.

(ix) Wool (whether in the form of fiber or yarn or contained in fabrics, materials, or manufactured

articles).

(x) Any item of individual equipment (Product or Service Code (PSC) 8465) manufactured from or

containing any of the fibers, yarns, fabrics, or materials listed in this paragraph (a)(1).

(2) Hand or measuring tools, unless the tools were produced in the United States. For additional

guidance, see PGI 225.7002-1 (a)(2).

(b) In accordance with section 8123 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2014 (Pub. L.

113-76, division C, title VIII), and the same provision in subsequent Defense appropriations acts,

except as provided in 225.7002-2 , do not acquire a flag of the United States (PSC 8345), unless such

flag, including the materials and components thereof, is manufactured in the United States,

consistent with the requirements at10 U.S.C. 4862. This restriction does not apply to the acquisition

of any end items or components related to flying or displaying the flag (e.g., flag poles and

accessories).

Parent topic: 225.7002 Restrictions on food, clothing, fabrics, hand or measuring tools, and flags.
410.001 Policy.       In addition to those uses listed in FAR 10.001, agencies must use the results of market research to -          (a) Ensure the minimum use of hazardous or toxic materials;          (b) Ensure the maximum use of biobased products and biofuels; and          (c) Identify products and services on or eligible for addition to the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act Procurement List in order to achieve USDA's goal to increase participation in this program.    **Parent topic:** PART 410 - MARKET RESEARCH
Exhibit 13.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Rodman International Enterprise I, Ltd.(the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Kirk M. Warshaw, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated: June 16, 2011





/s/ Kirk M. WarshawKirk M. WarshawChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)





A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1


May 17, 1999


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549

Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated May 14, 1999 on our review of interim
financial information of First Liberty Financial Corp. and subsidiaries (the
"Company") for the period ended March 31, 1999, and included in the Company's
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter then ended is incorporated by
reference into the Company's Form S-8 (File No. 33-24733). Pursuant to Rule
436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, this report should not be considered a
part of the registration statement prepared or certified by us within the
meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.


         Yours very truly,

         PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP



                                       24
#### SLOAN, Respondent, v. BEARD, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

July 24, 1906.)

Action by James Sloan against Grace F. Beard.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
Case 2:06-cv-00620-WKW-CSC Document 6 Filed 07/27/2006 Page 1 of 1
Editorial Note on Part 91
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 91 appear at 61 FR 51350, Oct. 2 1996.

§ 91.44 Charges on overdue accounts and issuance of delinquency notices. ( a ) Accounts are considered overdue if payment is late with the National Finance Center (NFC). The timeliness of a payment will be based on the postmark date of the payment or the date of receipt by the NFC if no postmark date is present or legible. Bills are payable upon receipt and become delinquent 30 days from date of billing.
( b ) Any amount due not paid by the due date will be increased by a late payment charge. The actual assessed rate applied to overdue accounts is set quarterly by the Department of the Treasury. This amount is one-twelfth of one year's late penalty interest rate computed at the prescribed rate.
( c ) Overtime or holiday laboratory service will not be performed for any applicant with a notice of delinquency.
( d ) Applicants with three notices of delinquency will be reviewed for possible termination of services. A deposit in advance sufficient to cover the fees and expenses for any subsequent service may be required of any person failing to pay in claim after issuance of such notice of delinquency.
( e ) The Deputy Administrator of S&T program and personnel of the USDA, NFC Billings and Collections Branch (address as listed in § 91.42) will take such actions as may be necessary to collect any delinquent amounts due for accounts in claim status.
[58 FR 42415, Aug. 9, 1993, as amended at 65 FR 64315, Oct. 26, 2000]