alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dental Amalgam Separator Program Comments/Suggestions

Byron Ross, Monitoring & Management Services, LLC

1. Minimum frequency could be established for cleaning the separators (i.e. 1/yr), with requirements 

to clean the separators more frequently based on patients in a particular “chair” or going to a 

particular separator unit (i.e. Every 2,000 ?? patients per separator connection frequency must be 

semi-annual; every 4,000 ?? patients per separator connection frequency must be quarterly. 

a. Consideration should be given for solids level in the amalgam separator. (i.e. when the 

separator solids level reaches 25% of the separator capacity it should be cleaned). Of 

course there are mfr recommendations which may be much higher than 25% (would need 

to see data on removal efficiency compared to solids depth in the separator...., but in 

most field experience cases that I have dealt with for traps and interceptors (and should 

be able to compare to amalgam separators) when 25% of the tank capacity is exceeded 

then you have increased BOD5, O&G, and TSS. I would think that this would apply to 

metals/Hg as well in an amalgam separator.

2. Recommend that EPA develop some mechanism to certify or verify that particular companies can 

clean amalgam separators. Or if dental office staff or others do the amalgam separator cleaning, 

then they have to go through training to ensure safety and prevent improper disposal.

a. Not only is maintenance critical to prevent short-circuiting, solids overload that allows 

Hg discharge to sewer...but also the disposal is important to prevent separator waste 

from going to incinerator. (I mention this because I have spoken with some dentists and 

they say they get someone to clean the separator and they bag it as bio-haz that goes to 

incineration.)

3. Annual or Semi-Annual Certification statement requirement from Dentist should not be too 

difficult for the POTW to comply. This appears to imply that a control mechanism of some type 

will need to be issued so the Dentists are aware of the Hg discharge prevention/control 

requirements.

a. More detail should be provided by EPA on a “General Permit” for Dentists. Provide an 

example General Permit. To prevent lot of headache, make the General Permit as short 

and simple as possible.

i. How can this General Permit be issued: POTW sends letter of notification to the 

Dentist stating that they are now under a General Permit for control of Hg 

discharges from Dental Offices ?...then reference website where General Permit 

is posted. 

1. What can be allowed to ease any “paper-work” burden on the POTW?

4. POTW inspection frequency of Dentist could be annual, every 2 yrs, or POTW must conduct an 

onsite inspection of the Dental Office every 3 years to confirm that the amalgam separator is 

installed and maintained.

a. Also, if certification is not provided by the Dentist to the POTW, then the POTW must 

conduct an onsite inspection.

b. Or possibly have requirement that POTWs must conduct at least one onsite inspection of 

each Dentist office within 3 years of promulgation of Dental rule.
#### 45-02 Food Corp., Respondent-Appellant, v 45-02 43rd Realty, LLC, Appellant-Respondent.

Submitted July 16, 2007;

decided October 18, 2007

Reported below, 37 AD3d 522.

Motions for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Case 2:06-cv-00669-MEF-SRW Document 1 Filed 07/27/2006 Page 1 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00669-MEF-SRW Document 1 Filed 07/27/2006 Page 2 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00669-MEF-SRW Document 1 Filed 07/27/2006 Page 3 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00669-MEF-SRW Document 1 Filed 07/27/2006 Page 4 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00669-MEF-SRW Document 1 Filed 07/27/2006 Page 5 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00669-MEF-SRW Document 1 Filed 07/27/2006 Page 6 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00669-MEF-SRW Document 1 Filed 07/27/2006 Page 7 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00669-MEF-SRW Document 1 Filed 07/27/2006 Page 8 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00669-MEF-SRW Document 1 Filed 07/27/2006 Page 9 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00669-MEF-SRW Document 1 Filed 07/27/2006 Page 10 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00669-MEF-SRW Document 1 Filed 07/27/2006 Page 11 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00669-MEF-SRW Document 1 Filed 07/27/2006 Page 12 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00669-MEF-SRW Document 1 Filed 07/27/2006 Page 13 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00669-MEF-SRW Document 1 Filed 07/27/2006 Page 14 of 14
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

§ 868.36 Loss of identity. ( a ) *Lots.* The identity of a packaged lot, bulk lot, or sublot of a commodity shall be considered lost if: ( 1 ) A portion of the commodity is unloaded, transferred, or otherwise removed from the carrier or location after the time of original inspection, unless the identity is preserved; or
( 2 ) More commodity or other material, including a fumigant or insecticide, is added to the lot after the original inspection was performed, unless the addition of the fumigant or insecticide was performed in accordance with the instructions; or
( 3 ) At the option of official personnel performing an appeal inspection or Board appeal inspection service, the identity of a commodity in a closed carrier or container may be considered lost if the carrier or container is not sealed or the seal record is incomplete.
( b ) *Carriers and containers.* The identity of a carrier or container shall be considered lost if ( 1 ) the stowage area is cleaned, treated, fumigated, or fitted after the original inspection was performed or
( 2 ) the identification has been changed since the original inspection.
( c ) *Submitted sample.* The identity of a submitted sample of a commodity shall be considered lost if: ( 1 ) The identifying number, mark, or symbol for the sample is lost or destroyed; or
( 2 ) The sample has not been retained and protected by official personnel as prescribed in the regulations and the instructions.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Authority:

7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 801.5 Tolerance for diverter-type mechanical samplers.

The maintenance tolerance for diverter-type mechanical samplers (primary, or primary and secondary in combination) used in performing official inspection services shall be ±10 percent, mean deviation from standard sampling device using corn or the same type of grain that the system will be used to sample.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 11, 2014

p0604 

# Order

Clerk June 11, 2014

147663

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

P laintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147663

COA: 312065

Berrien CC: 2011

- 001864

- FY

CYNTHIA CHERELLE JONES,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 9, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the

cases of People v Hartwick (Docket No. 148444) and People v Tuttle (Docket No.

148971) are p ending on appeal before this Court and that the decisions in those cases

may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that

the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decisions in those cases.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# AGENCY:

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). 

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

HHS gives notice concerning the final effect of the HHS decision to designate a class of employees from the Ames Laboratory, Ames, Iowa, as an addition to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. On October 6, 2010, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. 7384q(b), the Secretary of HHS designated the following class of employees as an addition to the SEC: 

All employees of the Department of Energy, its predecessor agencies, and its contractors and subcontractors who worked in any area of the Department of Energy facility at the Ames Laboratory from January 1, 1955 through December 31, 1960, for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days, occurring either solely under this employment, or in combination with work days within the parameters established for one or more other classes of employees in the Special Exposure Cohort.

                        This designation became effective on November 5, 2010, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. 7384*l*                        (14)(C). Hence, beginning on November 5, 2010, members of this class of employees, defined as reported in this notice, became members of the Special Exposure Cohort.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Interim Director, Division of Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, OH 45226, Telephone 877-222-7570. Information requests can also be submitted by e-mail to                         *DCAS@CDC.GOV.*

 John Howard, 

 Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

[FR Doc. 2010-30205 Filed 11-30-10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4163-19-P
NOTICE - ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD

MISDEMEANOR JURY TERM - MAY 7, 2007

U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE SUSAN RUSS WALKER, PRESIDING

USA v. Maria Hinton

2:07cr14-SRW

____________________________ ______________________________

Lindsey A. Brugnoli/Reese Hayes Christine Freeman/Patricia Kemp

(Government) (Defendant)

USA v. Carrie J. Flowers

2:06cr 178-SRW

_____________________________ ______________________________

Aaron Drake Ron Wise

(Government) (Defendant)

Case 2:06-cr-00178-SRW Document 22-3 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 1 of 1
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 286 

To amend section 401(b)(2) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 regarding 

the Federal Pell Grant maximum amount. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2005 

Mr. DODD (for himself, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. 

LIEBERMAN, Mr. SARBANES, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. DAYTON, Mr. LEVIN, 

Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. CORZINE, Mr. DURBIN, and Mr. 

AKAKA) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend section 401(b)(2) of the Higher Education Act 

of 1965 regarding the Federal Pell Grant maximum amount. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FEDERAL PELL GRANT MAXIMUM AMOUNT. 

4 Section 401(b)(2) of the Higher Education Act of 

5 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070a(b)(2)) is amended— 

6 (1) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as sub7 paragraph (C); 

8 (2) by striking subparagraph (A) and inserting 

9 the following: 
2 

•S 286 IS

1 ‘‘(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), 

2 the amount of the Federal Pell Grant for a student 

3 eligible under this part shall be— 

4 ‘‘(i) $7,600 for academic year 2005–2006; 

5 ‘‘(ii) $8,600 for academic year 2006–2007; 

6 ‘‘(iii) $9,600 for academic year 2007– 

7 2008; 

8 ‘‘(iv) $10,600 for academic year 2008– 

9 2009; and 

10 ‘‘(v) $11,600 for academic year 2009– 

11 2010, 

12 less an amount equal to the amount determined to 

13 be the expected family contribution with respect to 

14 that student for that year.’’; and 

15 (3) by inserting after subparagraph (A) (as 

16 amended by paragraph (2)) the following: 

17 ‘‘(B) If the Secretary determines that the in18 crease from one academic year to the next in the 

19 amount of the maximum Federal Pell Grant author20 ized under subparagraph (A) does not increase stu21 dents’ purchasing power (relative to the cost of at22 tendance at an institution of higher education) by 

23 not less than 5 percentage points, then the amount 

24 of the maximum Federal Pell Grant authorized 

25 under subparagraph (A) for the academic year for 
3 

•S 286 IS

1 which the determination is made shall be increased 

2 by an amount sufficient to achieve such a 5 percent3 age point increase.’’. 

Æ
5628.370 Additional Clauses.    *(Revised December 2011)*       (g) For contracts utilizing the clauses specified in DFARS 228.370, paragraphs (b) and (c), the Contracting Officer is delegated the authority to appoint the Ground Flight Representative (GFR).              HQ, United States Special Operations Command       Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L)       SOFARS 5628       February 2007 **Parent topic:** Subpart 5628.3 - INSURANCE
#### § 900.71 Hearing before Secretary.

The Secretary may act in the place and stead of a judge in any proceeding hereunder. When he so acts the hearing clerk shall transmit the record to the Secretary at the expiration of the period provided for the filing of proposed findings of fact, conclusions and orders, and the Secretary shall thereupon, after due consideration of the record, issue his final order in the proceeding: *Provided,* That he may issue a tentative order in which event the parties shall be afforded an opportunity to file exceptions before the issuance of the final order.
#### § 81.1 Applicability.

Pursuant to the authority conferred by Section 32 of the Act of August 24, 1935, as amended (7 U.S.C. 612c) (Section 32), the Secretary of Agriculture will make payment to California producers who divert prune/plums by removing trees on which the fruit is produced in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth herein.
Case 2:06-cv-00674-WKW-TFM Document 6 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
§ 932.153 Establishment of minimum quality and size requirements for processed olives for limited uses. ( a ) *Minimum quality requirements.* On or after August 1, 1996, any handler may use processed olives of the respective variety group in the production of limited use styles of canned ripe olives if such olives were processed after July 31, 1996, and meet the minimum quality requirements specified in § 932.52(a)(1) as modified by § 932.149.
( b ) *Sizes.* On and after August 1, 1996, any handler may use processed olives in the production of limited-use styles of canned ripe olives if such olives were harvested after August 1, 1996, and meet the following requirements: ( 1 ) The processed olives shall be identified and kept separate and apart from any olives harvested before August 1, 1996.
( 2 ) Variety Group 1 olives, except the Ascolano, Barouni, or St. Agostino varieties, shall be of a size which individually weigh at least 1 ⁄ 105 pound: *Provided,* That no more than 35 percent of the olives in any lot or sublot may be smaller than 1 ⁄ 105 pound.
( 3 ) Variety Group 1 olives of the Ascolano, Barouni, or St. Agostino varieties shall be of a size which individually weigh at least 1 ⁄ 180 pound: *Provided,* That no more than 35 percent of the olives in any lot or sublot may be smaller than 1 ⁄ 180 pound.
( 4 ) Variety Group 2 olives, except the Obliza variety, shall be of a size which individually weigh at least 1 ⁄ 205 pound: *Provided,* That not to exceed 35 percent of the olives in any lot or sublot may be smaller than 1 ⁄ 205 pound.
( 5 ) Variety Group 2 olives of the Obliza variety shall be of a size which individually weigh at least 1 ⁄ 180 pound: *Provided,* That not to exceed 35 percent of the olives in any lot or sublot may be smaller than 1 ⁄ 180 pound.
[61 FR 40510, Aug. 5, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 1244, Jan. 9, 1997]
#### § 932.75 Separability.

If any provision of this subpart is declared invalid or the applicability thereof to any person, circumstance, or thing is held invalid, the validity of the remainder of this subpart or the applicability thereof to any other person, circumstance, or thing shall not be affected thereby.
5612.302 Tailoring of Provisions and Clauses for Acquisition of Commercial Items. (Removed June 2021)    HQ, United States Special Operations Command       Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L-K)       SOFARS 5612       February 2007 **Parent topic:** Subpart 5612.3 - SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES FOR THE ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL ITEMS
Subpart 405.3 - Synopses of Contract Awards

Parent topic: PART 405 - PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONS

405.303 Announcement of contract awards.

Contracting officers shall make information available on any contract award with an estimated total

value over $1 million (including options) to their agency congressional liaison office in sufficient time

for the agency to announce it by 5:00 p.m. Washington, DC time on the day of award. The agency

congressional liaison office shall, concurrent with the public announcement, provide the award

announcement information to the USDA Congressional Relations Office.
§ 966.4 Production area and regulated area. ( a ) *Production area* means the counties of Pinellas, Hillsborough, Polk, Osceola, and Brevard in the State of Florida, and all the counties of that State situated south of such counties.
( b ) *Regulated area* means that portion of the State of Florida which is bounded by the Suwannee River, the Georgia border, the Atlantic Ocean, and the Gulf of Mexico.
[33 FR 8585, June 12, 1968, as amended at 34 FR 19186, Dec. 4, 1969]
Case 2:06-cv-00651-MEF-SRW Document 22 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00651-MEF-SRW Document 22 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 2 of 2
#### Henry R. Bass, Appellant, v. Ralph Buechele et al., Respondents.

In an action pursuant to article 16 of the Real Property Actions and Proceed*789ings Law to compel determination of a claim to real property, upon allegations that a certain tax sale and the deed given pursuant thereto are void, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the -Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated August 19, 1969 and made upon stipulated facts, which dismissed the complaint on the merits. Judgment affirmed, with costs. In our opinion, there was not such a failure to comply with sections 70 and 71 of the Suffolk County Tax Act (L. 1929, ch. 152, as amd. by L. 1959, ch. 745) as required the invalidation of the tax sale and the tax sale deed (cf. *Rogers*v. *Pact Realty Corp.,*26 N Y 2d 872; *Ierna*v. *Maranzano,*28 Misc 2d 231; *Erlwein*v. *Patchogue Homes Corp.,*43 Misc 2d 707). Here the 1961-1962 assessment roll and apparently the 1961-1962 tax bill contained the word “ arrears ”, although the word appeared as a result of a 1959 tax sale and not as a result of the 1961 sale. Christ, P. J., Hopkins, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur. (Beldock, P. J., deceased.)
411.600 Scope of subpart.

The Defense Priorities and Allocation System (DPAS) excludes USDA activities (see 15 CFR

700.18(b)). USDA Contracting Officers are not authorized to place rated orders under DPAS.

Parent topic: Subpart 411.6 - Priorities and Allocations
#### § 905.86 Agents.

The Secretary may, by designation in writing, name any person, including any officer or employee of the Government, or name any bureau or division in the United States Department of Agriculture, to act as his agent or representative in connection with any of the provisions of this part.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Julius F. Klein, Jr., Appellant.

Appeal by permission from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated June 20, 1979, which denied defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, rendered March 23, 1970, convicting him of murder in *858the first degree under the former Penal Law, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The order of this court dated August 31, 1979, granting permission to appeal to this court, is deemed amended to reflect the correct date of the order sought to be reviewed. Order reversed, on the law, and matter remanded to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for a new hearing in accordance herewith. The hearing court committed reversible error in considering as evidence an affidavit of former Assistant District Attorney Maurice Nadjari, who was the trial prosecutor at the defendant’s murder trial. Since the affidavit was clearly hearsay, and was never formally received into evidence, it should not have been relied upon by the hearing court in reaching its determination. Hopkins, J. P., Titone, Mangano and Rabin, JJ., concur.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2947 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Fast Yellow 2 Stage Liquid 

Feed. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 23, 2006 

Mr. CARPER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Fast Yellow 

2 Stage Liquid Feed. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FAST YELLOW 2 STAGE LIQUID FEED. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subheading 9902.04.19 of the 

5 Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating 

6 to Fast Yellow 2 Stage) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/ 

7 2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 2947 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS