alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           3,123
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,383
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,954)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,864
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,308
<PP&E>                                          14,545
<DEPRECIATION>                                (10,393)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  37,330
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,544
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           105
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,799)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,330
<SALES>                                         15,209
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,209
<CGS>                                          (8,034)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  (8,034)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (8,086)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   29
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (206)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,088)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,088)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,088)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)
        

</TABLE>
#### Cyprian C. Davis, Appellant, v Peek A Boo Cab Corp. et al., Respondents.

Submitted July 9, 2007;

decided September 11, 2007

Reported below, 38 AD3d 708.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

MAXIE McNABB, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv664-MHT

) 

SANDERS LEAD COMPANY, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

Because of a scheduling conflict, it is ORDERED the

uniform scheduling order (Doc. No. 7) is modified in the

following respects:

(1) The pretrial is reset for October 18, 2007, at

9:15 a.m., and the trial is reset for the term

of court beginning on November 26, 2007, with

all deadlines expressly tied to these two dates

adjusted accordingly.

(2) All other deadlines are unchanged.

DONE, this the 15th day of August, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00664-MHT-SRW Document 35 Filed 08/15/2007 Page 1 of 1
98-1681.

#### State v. Emerick.

Montgomery App. No. 15768. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

 _______________________________

HOWARD GLENN TOOLE, #C 917683 *

Petitioner, *

 v. * 1:06-CV-696-MHT

JAMES MCDONOUGH, et al., * 

Respondents. *

 _______________________________

ORDER ON MOTION

Upon consideration of Petitioner’s motion for extension of time, and for good cause,

it is ORDERED that

1. Petitioner’s motion (Doc. No. 11) be and is hereby GRANTED;

2. Petitioner is GRANTED an extension from August 29, 2006 to September 11, 2006

to comply with the court’s August 14, 2006 order. .

Done, this day 22 day of August 2006. nd

/s/ Vanzetta Penn McPherson

VANZETTA PENN MCPHERSON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 12 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 1 of 1
EX-35 (g)
(logo) WELLS FARGO


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Corporate Trust Services
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000


March 21, 2007


Banc of America Funding Corporation
214 North Tyron Street
Charlotte, NC 28255


RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for Banc of America Funding 2006-6 Trust


Per Section 3.20 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of 9/28/2006,
the undersigned Officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Securities Administrator),
hereby certifies the following for the 2006 calendar year or portion thereof:


     (a)   a review of the activities of such party during the preceding
           calendar year or portion thereof and of performance of such party
           under this Agreement has been made under such officers' supervision
           and


     (b)   to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such
           party has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in
           all material respects throughout such year, or, if there has been a
           failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect,
           specifying each such failure known to such officer and the nature
           and status thereof.


Certified By:
/s/ Christopher C. Regnier
Christopher C. Regnier, Vice President


Certified By:
/s/ Gordon Johnson
Gordon Johnson, Assistant Secretary
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Authority:

7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 810.1003 Basis of determination.

Other determinations not specifically provided for under the general provisions are made on the basis of the grain as a whole.
#### § 760.910 Appeals.

The appeal regulations set forth at parts 11 and 780 of this title apply to determinations made pursuant to this subpart.
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-13-0212

SAT Date: 1/18/2013

Print Date: 5/5/2014

Related cases:

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1-2 1

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

3 1 1 Anion

1 2 1

1 1 2

1 1 2

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Inhalation 

Ecotox: No releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: LUNG, IRR-MM, SENS, DEVEL

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-13-0212-13

FATE: Estimations for low weight MW 373 

log Kow = 4.26 (E)

log Koc = 1.86 (E)

log Fish BCF = 0.50 (E)

log Fish BAF = 1.48 (E)

FATE: Estimations for MW 257 

log Kow = 5.47 (E)

log Koc = 4.16 (E)

log Fish BCF = 1.90 (E)

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 3 EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 3 EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 3
log Fish BAF = 3.14 (E) 

FATE: Estimations for 

log Kow = -1.00 (M)

log Koc = 1.00 (E)

log Fish BCF = 0.50 (E)

log Fish BAF = -0.05 (E)

FATE: Estimations for 

log Kow = -1.31 (M)

log Koc = 0.07 (E)

log Fish BCF = 0.50 (E)

log Fish BAF = -0.05 (E)

PMN Substance: Liquid with MP = -20 C (Sub. Est.)

S = Dispersible (E)

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

POTW removal (%) = Anion 90 via sorption; 90 via sorption;

 90; 90 via biodeg

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = Anion wk-mo; 

 wk; 

 da-wk; 

 da

Sorption to soils/sediments = moderate - strong

PBT Potential: Anion P3B1; P1B2; 

 P1B1; P1B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = slow - moderate

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is poor through the skin, moderate through 

the GI tract, and good through the lungs based on analogs. There is concern for irritation to 

mucous membranes and lung effects if inhaled based on the surfactant properties of the PMN 

material and concern for sensitization and developmental toxicity for 

 Low moderate concern. 

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 >100

daphnid 48-h LC50 >100

green algal 96-h EC50 >100

fish _ chronic value >10

daphnid _ chronic 

value

>10

algal _ chronic >10

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 3 EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 3 EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 3
value

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for anionic surfactants; SAR 

chemical class = MW 434 (major component); liquid; S = 

dispersible in water at 25 C (P); pH7; effective concentrations based on 100% active 

ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness < 150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC 

<2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

1000

SARs anionic surfactants

SAR Class

Ecotox Category Anionic Surfactants

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: Becky Jones

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 3 EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 3 EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 3
PART 16 –– TYPES OF CONTRACTS       SUBPART 16.5 –– INDEFINITE–DELIVERY CONTRACTS                                                         16.504 Indefinite–quantity contracts.                                                            16.505 Ordering.                                                            16.601 Time–and–materials contracts.                                                            216.601 Time–and–materials contracts.    SUBPART 16.5 –– INDEFINITE–DELIVERY CONTRACTS     16.504 Indefinite–quantity contracts.    (S-90) Funding for the minimum guarantee shall be obligated at the time of contract award via the first order. (See DARS 7.105(b)(6))16.505 Ordering.    (b)(6) *Postaward*          *Notices and Debriefing of Awardees for Orders Exceeding $6 million*. The Initial Letter to Unsuccessful Offerors and Debriefing Letter to Unsuccessful Offerors, located in the DARS PGI, shall be used to notify unsuccessful awardees when the total price of a task or delivery order exceeds $6 million.       (b)(8) *Task-order and delivery-order ombudsman*. The Designation and Delegation of Authority for the Agency Task and Delivery Order Ombudsman is located at https://www.ditco.disa.mil/hq/delegation_memos.asp.16.601 Time–and–materials contracts.    (d)(1) Time-and-materials or labor-hour CLINS for strictly travel costs or Other Direct Costs that are ancillary to the primary purpose of a fixed price contract do not require a determination and findings. T&M or LH CLINS shall not exceed 33.33% of the total contract value, not including travel; a D&F is required if exceeding 33.33%.216.601 Time–and–materials contracts.    (d)(i)(A)(1)(i) The Chief of the Contracting Office is the senior contracting official within the contracting activity.
**Exhibit 10.1**AMENDMENT No. 1 TO SECURED LOAN AGREEMENT     AMENDMENT TO SECURED LOAN AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) dated as of September 24, 2007 amongWESTLB AG, NEW YORK BRANCH (the “Lender”), U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a national bankingassociation (the “Collateral Agent” and “Securities Intermediary”), LEAF EQUIPMENT LEASINGINCOME FUND III, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“LEAF” or the “Seller”), LEAF FINANCIALCORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (the “Servicer”), LEAF FUNDING INC., a Delaware corporation(the “Originator”) and LEAF FUND III, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Borrower”).WITNESSETH:     WHEREAS, the parties hereto are parties to the Secured Loan Agreement, dated as of June 19,2007 (the “Secured Loan Agreement”);     WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 14.04 of the Secured Loan Agreement, the parties hereto wish toamend the Secured Loan Agreement and hereby agree that the Secured Loan Agreement is herebyamended; and     NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which arehereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:     SECTION 1. Definitions.     (a) Wheneverused in this Amendment, capitalized terms used and not otherwisedefined herein shall have the meanings set forth in Appendix A to the Secured Loan Agreement.     (b) Anyterm that relates to a document or a statute, rule, or regulation includes anyamendments, modifications, supplements, or any other changes that may have occurred since thedocument, statute, rule, or regulation came into being, including changes that occur after thedate of this Amendment.     SECTION 2. Amendments. The parties hereto hereby agree, pursuant to Section 14.04 ofthe Secured Loan Agreement, to amend the Secured Loan Agreement as follows:     (a) The definition of Maximum Facility Amount in Appendix A shall be struck in its
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

§ 800.55 Descriptions by grade. ( a ) *General.* In any sale, offer for sale, or consignment for sale, which involves the shipment of grain in interstate or foreign commerce, the description of grain, as being of a grade in any advertising, price quotation, other negotiation of sale, contract of sale, invoice, bill of lading, other document, or description on bags or other containers of the grain, is prohibited if such description is other than by an official grade designation, with or without additional information as to specified factors. An official grade designation contains any of the following: The term “U.S.,” the numerals 1 through 5, the term “Sample grade,” or the name of a subclass or a special grade of grain specified in the Official United States Standards for Grain.
( b ) *Proprietary brand names or trademarks.* A description of grain by a proprietary brand name or a trademark that does not resemble an official grade designation will not be considered to be a description by grade; but a description by a proprietary brand name or trademark that contains singly or in combination any of the terms referenced in paragraph (a) of this section shall be considered to resemble an official grade designation.
( c ) *Use of one or more factor designations.* In interstate commerce, a description of grain by the use of one or more grade factor designations which appear in the Official United States Standards for Grain or by other criteria will not be considered to be a description by grade.
( d ) *False or misleading descriptions.* In any sale, offer for sale, or consignment for sale of any grain which involves the shipment of grain from the United States to any place outside thereof, knowingly using a false or misleading description of grain by official grade designation, or other description is prohibited.
[50 FR 9982, Mar. 13, 1985]
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

RALPH WILSON LINGO, )

)

 Petitioner, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06-CV-703-MHT

)

STATE OF ALABAMA, et al., )

)

 Respondents. )

ORDER ON MOTION

Upon consideration of the motion for immediate ruling filed by the petitioner on

May 28, 2008 (Court Doc. No. 62), and for good cause, it is

ORDERED that this motion be and is hereby DENIED. 

The petitioner is advised that this case is pending on his amended petition for habeas

corpus relief, the respondents’ answer thereto and his response to this answer. The

petitioner is further advised that no additional pleadings are necessary for disposition of

the issues presented in the petition and he will be immediately advised of any action taken

by the court in this case. While the court is mindful that the amended petition has been

pending before this court since October 19, 2006 and the requisite pleadings filed by the

parties as of November 30, 2006, the court’s caseload of actions pending under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 makes it extremely difficult to expedite resolution of this or any other cause of

action, particularly since the court has adopted a policy of disposing of cases on the basis

of length of pendency. The court assures the petitioner that a determination of the issues

Case 1:06-cv-00703-MHT-CSC Document 63 Filed 05/28/2008 Page 1 of 2
2

presented in this case will be undertaken in due course.

Done this 28th day of May, 2008.

 /s/ Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00703-MHT-CSC Document 63 Filed 05/28/2008 Page 2 of 2
REPORT
      ON
      ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE




First
      American Real Estate Solutions of Texas, L.P. (an indirect subsidiary of The
      First American
      Corporation, and ** the
      "Asserting Party") is responsible for assessing compliance
      as of December 31, 2006, and for the period from January 1, 2006 through December
      31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period") with the servicing criteria set forth in
      Title
      17, Sections 229.1122(d)(1)(iv), (d)(2)(v), (d)(2)(vi), (d)(2)(vii), (d)(4)(xi),
      (d)(4)(xii) and
      (d)(4)(xiii) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the "CFR") applicable to the Asserting
      Party (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria"). The transactions covered by this report
      include all loans for residential mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which
      the Asserting
      Party served as the residential tax service provider (the
      "Platform").




The
      Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing
      Criteria for
      the
      Reporting Period and has concluded that, except as set forth hereinbelow, the
      Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable
      Servicing Criteria
      as of December 31, 2006, and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform
      taken as a whole.




The
      Asserting Party assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicmg Criteria
      for the Reporting Period and has identified a material instance of noncompliance
      with the servicing
      criterion set forth in Section 229.1122(d)(2)(vii)(B) of the CFR with respect
      to the
      Platform. Specifically, the Asserting Party did not prepare reconciliations
      for
      all asset-backed
      securities related bank accounts within 30 calendar days after the bank statement
      cut-off date or such number of days specified in the transaction
      agreements.




PricewaterhouseCoopers
      LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued
      an
      attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing
      Criteria as of December 31, 2006, and for the Reporting Period as set forth
      in this
      assertion.




FIRST
      AMERICAN REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS OF TEXAS, L.P.


By: 
      First American Real Estate Solutions LLC


General
      Partner




/s/
      Lucy A. Przybyla


Lucy
      A.
      Przybyla


Senior
      Vice President


February
      28, 2007
Exhibit
10.35


 


AMENDMENT
NO. 4


 


	National
    Geographic Partners, LLC (“NGS”)

    1145 Seventeenth Street, NW

    Washington, DC 20036

    USA

    	Lindblad
    Expeditions, LLC (“Lindblad”)

    96 Morton Street

    New York, NY 10014

    USA

    


 


This
the FOURTH amendment (“Amendment 4”), dated as of December 29, 2017, to that Alliance and License Agreement
effective as of December 12, 2011, as amended on November 20, 2014 (“Amendment 1”) and March 9, 2015 (“Amendment
2”) and December 5, 2016 (“Amendment 3”), between NGS and Lindblad (collectively, the “Agreement”).


 


NGS
and Lindblad (desire to modify the Agreement as follows:


 


		1.	The
first paragraph of Subsection 5(a) shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following.



 


		2.	NGS
hereby grants to Lindblad a non-exclusive license to use the Licensed Property for the advertising and promotion of Lindblad Trips
(A) during the Term in Australia, New Zealand and the United States, its territories and possessions, and (B) commencing with
Lindblad Trip and NGE/Lindblad Trip departures booked on or after December 5, 2016 through and including December 31, 2018 (the
“Europe/Asia Term”), in Europe and Asia. Europe, Asia, Australia, New Zealand and the United States, its territories
and possessions shall be collectively referred to as the “Territory”; provided, however, that Europe and Asia shall
be removed from such definition upon expiration of the Europe/Asia Term, if not extended in writing, by mutual agreement of the
Parties. In the event Lindblad wishes to use the Licensed Property in advertising and promotion directed at a specific region
outside the Territory, NGS and Lindblad may mutually agree in writing in advance. In addition, NGS hereby grants to Lindblad a
non-exclusive license to use the Licensed Property in association with the Lindblad Expeditions name, trademarks, service marks
and logos in connection with promotional and public relations communications in the Territory relating to Lindblad Trips departing
during the Term to destinations worldwide, subject to the terms, limitations and conditions of this Agreement. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, Lindblad shall make no use of the Licensed Property:



 


		3.	All
other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect, including, without limitation, all representations,
warranties and indemnities.



 


		4.	Each
capitalized term used but not defined in this Amendment shall have the meaning ascribed to it in the pertinent Agreement



 


	NATIONAL
    GEOGRAPHIC PARTNERS, LLC	 	LINDBLAD
    EXPEDITIONS, LLC
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Jeffrey Schneider 	 	By:	/s/ Philip Auerbach
	Name:	Jeffrey Schneider 	 	Name:	Philip Auerbach
	Date:	1/9/2018	 	Date:	12/29/17
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

H.J.C.

, Appellant,

v.

J.Y.

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 1227

[ November 19, 2020 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Fabienne Fahnestock , Judge; L.T. Case No. FMCE17

-

13542.

Catherine L. Roselli, Esq., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

David M. Scott, Esq. of Florida Family Law Clinic, LLC, Fort Lauderdale,

for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY

, F ORST and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
§ 925.41 Assessments. ( a ) Each person who first handles grapes shall pay to the committee, upon demand, such handler's pro rata share of the expenses which the Secretary finds are reasonable and likely to be incurred by the committee during a fiscal period. The payment of assessments for the maintenance and functioning of the committee may be required under this part throughout the period it is in effect irrespective of whether particular provisions thereof are suspended or become inoperative.
( b ) The Secretary shall fix the rate of assessment to be paid by each such person during a fiscal period in an amount designed to secure sufficient funds to cover the expenses which may be incurred during such period and to accumulate and maintain a reserve fund equal to approximately one fiscal period's expenses. At any time during or after a fiscal period, the Secretary may increase the rate of assessment in order to secure sufficient funds to cover any later findings by the Secretary relative to the expenses which may be incurred. Such increase shall be applied to all grapes handled during the applicable fiscal period. In order to provide funds for the administration of the provisions of this part during the first part of a fiscal period before sufficient operating income is available from assessments in the current period's shipments, the committee may accept the payment of assessments in advance, and may also borrow money for such purpose.
( c ) Any assessment not paid by a handler within a period of time prescribed by the committee may be subject to an interest or late payment charge, or both. The period of time, rate of interest, and late payment charge shall be recommended by the committee and approved by the Secretary. Subsequent to such approval, all assessments not paid within the prescribed time shall be subject to the interest or late payment charge, or both.