alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex_107195.htm

EXHIBIT 10(d)

 

 

December 14, 2017

 

Lucian Theon Smith III

 

 

Dear Lou:

 

Reference is made to your letter agreement with us dated July 24, 2015 (the “Letter Agreement”).  The Letter Agreement provides that beginning with our anticipated 2019 Long-Term Incentive Program, you would be eligible to receive an “LTIP” award with a target value equal to 2-times your base salary level in effect on December 16, 2017.  

 

We are writing to confirm our agreement and understanding regarding your right to future LTIP awards, commencing with an award under our 2018 Long-Term Incentive Program.  You have been granted an LTIP award under our 2018 Long-Term Incentive Program with a target level of $630,000, representing 90% of your base salary level as scheduled to be in effect on December 16, 2017.  While the exact level, frequency and vesting and payment terms of any future LTIP awards to be made to you have not yet been determined, we presently anticipate that you will remain eligible to receive future LTIP awards (in fiscal year 2019 and beyond) on an approximately annual basis at a level generally consistent with your 2018 LTIP award grant.  

 

You hereby acknowledge and agree that your receipt of the 2018 LTIP award and our stated expectations regarding your eligibility for future LTIP grants, shall fully satisfy your rights to receive LTIP grants as set forth in the Letter Agreement.

 

Except as set forth herein, the terms of your Letter Agreement remain in full force and effect.  Please acknowledge your agreement by signing below.  

 

 

Sincerely,

 

 


J. Larry Sorsby

Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

 

Acknowledged and Agreed:

 

 

______________________

Lucian Theon Smith III

 

Dated: December 14, 2017
§ 770.7 Security requirements. ( a ) The applicant will take appropriate action to obtain and provide security for the loan.
( b ) A mortgage or deed of trust on the land to be purchased by the applicant will be taken as security for a loan, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section. ( 1 ) If a mortgage or deed of trust is to be obtained on trust or restricted land and the applicant's constitution or charter does not specifically authorize mortgage of such land, the mortgage must be authorized by tribal referendum.
( 2 ) All mortgages or deeds of trust on trust or restricted land must be approved by the Department of the Interior.
( c ) The Agency may take an assignment of income in lieu of a mortgage or deed of trust provided: ( 1 ) The Agency determines that an assignment of income provides as good or better security; and
( 2 ) Prior approval of the Administrator has been obtained.
12.403 Termination.

(b) Policy. Contracting officers shall coordinate contract/order termination actions with the CoCO,

HCO and legal counsel and, if the contractor is a small business concern, with the Office of Small

Business Programs (OSBP). The HCO and HCA and will be updated in weekly DITCO SITREPs.

Parent topic: SUBPART 12.4 – UNIQUE REQUIREMENTS REGARDING TERMS AND CONDITIONS

FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

Foreign-Trade Zone 214 was approved by the Foreign-Trade Zones Board on May 7, 1996 (Board Order 815), and expanded on August 14, 2003 (Board Order 1281) and November 2, 2007 (Board Order 1531).

                    FTZ 214 currently consists of 3 “sites” totaling 1,250 acres in the Lenoir County area. The current update does not alter the physical boundaries that have previously been approved, but instead involves an administrative renumbering that separates certain non-                          ( print page 76954)                        contiguous sites for record-keeping purposes.                

Under this revision, the site list for FTZ 214 will be as follows: Site 1 (1,131 acres)—within the Kinston Regional Jetport complex, Lenoir County; Site 2 (35 acres)—located at 1114 Kingsboro Road, Rocky Mount, Edgecombe County; Site 3 (56 acres)—located at 400 English Road, Rocky Mount, Nash County; and, Site 4 (28 acres)—located at 1201 Thorpe Road, Rocky Mount, Nash County.

                    For further information, contact Maureen Hinman at                     *maureen.hinman@trade.gov*                     or (202) 482-0627.                

Dated: December 1, 2010.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-31107 Filed 12-9-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
#### § 923.33 Expenses and compensation.

The members of the committee, and alternates when acting as members, shall be reimbursed for expenses necessarily incurred by them in the performance of their duties under this part and may also receive compensation, as determined by the committee, which shall not exceed $10 per day or portion thereof spent in performing such duties: *Provided,* That at its discretion the committee may request the attendance of one or more alternates at any or all meetings, notwithstanding the expected or actual presence of the respective members, and may pay expenses and compensation, as aforesaid.
§ 923.60 Reports. ( a ) Upon request of the committee, made with the approval of the Secretary, each handler shall furnish to the committee, in such manner and at such time as it may prescribe, such reports and other information as may be necessary for the committee to perform its duties under this part. Such reports may include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: ( 1 ) The quantities of each variety of cherries received by a handler;
( 2 ) The quantities disposed of by him, segregated as to the respective quantities subject to regulation and not subject to regulation;
( 3 ) The date of each such disposition and the identification of the carrier transporting such cherries, and
( 4 ) The destination of each shipment of such cherries.
( b ) All such reports shall be held under appropriate protective classification and custody by the committee, or duly appointed employees thereof, so that the information contained therein which may adversely affect the competitive position of any handler in relation to other handlers will not be disclosed. Compilations of general reports from data submitted by handlers are authorized, subject to the prohibition of disclosure of individual handler's identities or operations.
( c ) Each handler shall maintain for at least two succeeding years such records of the cherries received, and of cherries disposed of, by such handler as may be necessary to verify reports pursuant to this section.
#### LEAHY v. ESSEX CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

July 1, 1914.)

1. Food (§ 25*)—Sales—Implied Warranty—Evidence of Breach—Poisons.

Evidence, in an action for breach of an implied warranty on. the sale of food for immediate consumption, *held*sufficient to warrant the jury in finding that plaintiff was suffering from food poisoning, and that the food purchased of defendant was the cause.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Food, Cent. Dig. § 18; Dec. Dig. § 25.*]

2. Sales (§ 274*)—Implied Warranty—Food.

There is an implied warranty in the sale of pie of its fitness for consumption.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Sales, Cent. Dig. §§ 777-779; Dec. Dig. § 274.*]

Appeal from Rensselaer County Court.

Action -by Hannah Leahy against the Essex Company. From a judgment dismissing the complaint, plaintiff appeals.

Reversed, and new trial granted.

Argued before SMITH, P. J., and KELLOGG, LYON, HOWARD, and WOODWARD, JJ.

John P. Judge, of Troy, for appellant.

Countryman, Nellis & Du Bois, of Albany (M. H. Nellis, of Albany, of counsel), for respondent.

*

For other cases see same topic *&*§ number in Dec. *&*Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep’r Indexes

JOHN M. KELLOGG, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for the breach of an implied warranty on the sale of food for immediate consumption. The evidence showed that the plaintiff, immediately after eating her luncheon at the defendant’s lunchroom, was taken violently sick and was suffering from food poisoning. She lunched at about 12:30, eating some toast, a part of a piece of chocolate pie, and drinking some tea. The pie seemed of an unusual color and taste. She never before had eaten a piece of chocolate pie that had the same taste; she therefore ate only about one-half the piece purchased. At 1:30 she was taken violently sick. That morning she had eaten an *1064orange and drank a cup of cocoa, and during the forenoon she drank a glass of water and the night before had eaten a hearty meal.

[1] The county judge dismissed the complaint upon the ground that it could not be determined with reasonable certainty that the food poisoning was caused by the food purchased of the defendant. It appeared that after the ingestion of milk, or milk compound, the symptoms of food poisoning would appear from within a few minutes to five or six hours. The evidence was sufficient to enable the jury to determine that the plaintiff was suffering from food poisoning, and that the food purchased of the defendant was the cause thereof. The case was therefore improperly taken from the jury.

[2] In Race v. Krum, 146 N. Y. Supp. 197, decided by this court in March, 1913, in which a motion for a reargument was denied by a memorandum handed down by the court at the May term (147 N. Y. Supp. 818), Ve held that there was an implied warranty in the sale of food under somewhat similar circumstances.

The judgment is therefore reversed, and a new trial granted, with costs to "the appellant to abide the event. All concur.
Part 5144 - Subcontracting Policies and

Procedures

Subpart 5144.3 - Contractors Purchasing System Reviews

5144.302 Requirements.

Subpart 5144.3 - Contractors Purchasing System Reviews

5144.302 Requirements.

(a) The Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology), on a non-delegable

basis, may raise or lower the $50 million review level for contracts administered by the Army, if it is

considered to be in the Government’s best interest.
# Subpart 245.70 - Reserved

**Parent topic:**Part 245 - GOVERNMENT PROPERTY
#### In the Matter of County of Nassau, Appellant, v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al., Respondents.

Judgment of the Supreme

Court, Nassau County, dated May 7, 1968, affirmed, with costs to respondents, on the opinion of ‘Special Term *(Matter of County of Nassau*v. *Metropolitan Transp. Auth.,*57 Misc 2d 1025). Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin Hopkins and Martuscello, JJ., concur. [57 Misc 2d 1025.]
# 5142.7100 General.

(4)  Voluntary refunds must be approved by the head of the contracting activity as described in DFARS PGI 242.7100(4).  See Appendix GG for further delegation.

**Parent topic:**Subpart 5142.71 - Voluntary Refunds
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-140007 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 2, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Guidance Software, Inc. and subsidiaries (which report expresses an unqualified opinion), and the effectiveness of Guidance Software, Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Guidance Software, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2010.

 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

 

Los Angeles, California

March 2, 2011

 

----
Case 2:06-mj-00073-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-mj-00073-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-mj-00073-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 3 of 3
Subpart 704.4—Safeguarding Classified Information Within Industry    **Parent topic:** PART 704—ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS704.404 Contract clauses.       (a) When the contract includes a requirement for the contractor to access classified (“Confidential”, “Secret”, or “Top Secret”), or administratively controlled (“Sensitive But Unclassified”) information, the contracting officer must insert (48 CFR) FAR clause 52.204–2, Security Requirements and (48 CFR) AIDAR clause 752.204–2, Security Requirements, in the solicitation and award.          (b) If the contract requires the contractor (or contractor employees) to have routine physical access to USAID-controlled facilities in the U.S. (*i.e.,* will need an ID for regular entry to USAID space), or have logical access to USAID's information systems (*i.e.,* access to AIDNet, Phoenix, the Global Acquisition and Assistance System (GLAAS,) etc.,) and the solicitation and contract contains (48 CFR) FAR 52.204–9(a), the contracting officer must also insert (48 CFR) AIDAR 752.204–72, Access to USAID Facilities and USAID's Information Systems. Only U.S citizen employees or consultants of a U.S.-based company may request routine physical access to USAID-controlled facilities or logical access to USAID's information systems.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3086 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Brotje nose wheel well machines. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. BROWNBACK introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Brotje nose wheel well 

machines. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BROTJE NOSE WHEEL WELL MACHINES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.84.65 Brotje nose wheel well machines (provided for in subheading 8465.94.00) ....... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 3086 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
#### § 925.10 Handle.

*Handle* is synonymous with *ship* and means to pack, sell, deliver (including delivery to a storage facility), transport, or in any way to place grapes in the current of commerce within the production area or between the production area and any point outside thereof: *Provided,* That such term shall not include the sale of grapes on the vine and except when regulations are effective pursuant to § 925.52(a)(5) shall not include the transportation or delivery of grapes to a packinghouse within the production area for preparation for market.
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-0 7 -00 387 -CV In re The Gaylor d Sk inn er Tr ust, Gaylord Skin ner and Ricki Don S kin ner

ORI GINAL PRO CEEDING FRO M TRAVIS COUNTY ME MO R

A ND UMO P I N I O N The pe tition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P . 52.8(a) .

__________________________________________ J an P. Patterson, J ustice Be fore J ustices Patterson, Puryear and He nson Filed: August 3, 2007
§ 915.42 Accounting. ( a ) If, at the end of a fiscal year, the assessments collected are in excess of expenses incurred, such excess shall be accounted for as follows: ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, each person entitled to a proportionate refund of the excess assessment shall be credited with such refund against the operation of the following fiscal year unless such person demands repayment thereof, in which event it shall be paid to him: *Provided,* That any sum paid by a person in excess of his pro rata share of the expenses during any fiscal year may be applied by the committee at the end of such fiscal year to any outstanding obligations due the committee from such person.
( 2 ) The Secretary, upon recommendation of the committee, may determine that it is appropriate for the maintenance and functioning of the committee that the funds remaining at the end of a fiscal year which are in excess of the expenses necessary for committee operations during such year may be carried over into following years as a reserve. Such reserve may be established at an amount not to exceed approximately 3 fiscal years' operational expenses. Funds in the reserve may be used to cover the necessary expenses of liquidation, in the event of termination of this part, and to cover the expenses incurred for the maintenance and functioning of the committee during any fiscal year when there is crop failure, or during any period of suspension of any or all of the provisions of this part. Such reserve may also be used by the committee to finance its operations during any fiscal year prior to the time that assessment income is sufficient to cover such expenses and to cover deficits incurred during any fiscal year when income is less than expenses. Upon termination of this part, any funds not required to defray the necessary expenses of liquidation shall be disposed of in such manner as the Secretary may determine to be appropriate: *Provided,* That to the extent practical, such funds shall be returned pro rata to the persons from whom such funds were collected.
( b ) All funds received by the committee pursuant to the provisions of this part shall be used solely for the purposes specified in this part, and shall be accounted for in the manner provided in this part. The Secretary may, at any time, require the committee and its members to account for all receipts and disbursements.
[19 FR 3439, June 11, 1954, as amended at 22 FR 3513, May 21, 1957. Redesignated at 26 FR 12751, Dec. 30, 1961, as amended at 35 FR 16628, Oct. 27, 1970; 43 FR 39323, Sept. 5, 1978]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2849 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2849

        To suspend temporarily the duty on certain sports shoes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 18, 2006

 Mr. Brownback introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To suspend temporarily the duty on certain sports shoes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN SPORTS SHOES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.64.15      Sports footwear;    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         tennis shoes,                                                      31/2009
                         basketball shoes,
                         gym shoes,
                         training shoes
                         and the like, all
                         the foregoing
                         with outer soles
                         of rubber or
                         plastics and
                         uppers of textile
                         materials for
                         women (provided
                         for in subheading
                         6404.11.20)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
156 So.2d 604

#### Bill D. LESLIE, d/b/a Leslie Lumber & Supply Company, v. Gerald L. KNIPPERS.

No. 46918.

Oct. 9, 1963.

In re: Gerald L. Knippers applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Sabine. 154 So.2d 794.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.
#### § 948.100 Order.

*Order* means §§ 948.1 to 948.92 (Order No. 948 as amended) regulating the handling of Irish potatoes grown in the State of Colorado.
#### § 774.21 [Reserved]
#### SUNDERLAND, Respondent, v. BROOKLYN HEIGHTS R. CO., Appellant

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 15, 1906.)

Action by Marguerite Sunder-land against the Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company.

No opinion. Motion denied.
#### In the Matter of Neri’s Continental, Inc., Petitioner, v. New York State Liquor Authority, Respondent.

Determination of State Liquor Authority suspending petitioner’s license for 10 days, imposing payment of the penal sum of the bond filed and deferring the suspension for 12 months upon the payment of said sum, unanimously annulled, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements to petitioner. The improper conduct relied on to bring petitioner within subdivision 14 of rule 36 (9 NYCRR 53.1 [n]) consisted of alleged violations of sections 100 and 102 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law. Since the charges that such violations occurred were not sustained, the finding of improper conduct is without basis. (See, also, *Matter of Winfield Flynn, Ltd.*v. *New York State Liq. Auth.,*23 A D 2d 745.) Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Eager, Tilzcr and Rabin, JJ.