alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

ANTHONY BERNARD MOORER )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06CV672-

 ) WKW

)

CITY OF MONTGOMERY, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER 

On August 23, 2006, this Court granted Plaintiff’s motion to add Bernard Harris

and Thomas Provitt as individual defendants in their individual capacities to this litigation 

(Doc. #8). The Court also granted Plaintiff’s motion to assert his claims under 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 (2000) (Doc. #8). On September 21, 2006, this Court dismissed Plaintiff’s Title

VII claims with prejudice and referred the matter back to the undersigned Magistrate

Judge for additional proceedings (Doc. #9). On January 23, 2007, the undersigned

Magistrate Judge ordered Plaintiff to file an amended complaint, specifically setting forth

his claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on or before February 6, 2007. The Court further

ordered Plaintiff to provide the mailing addresses of both Defendants Bernard Harris and

Thomas Provitt on or before February 6, 2007. Plaintiff has compiled with the latter

demand, but has failed to file an amended complaint, specifically setting forth his claims

under § 1983. Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is to serve all Defendants in this matter with

Case 2:06-cv-00672-WKW-WC Document 12 Filed 02/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. #1), Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend the Complaint to Include

Defendants and to Make Claims Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. #7), the Summons,

this Court’s Report and Recommendations (Doc. #8), and the District Judge’s Order

adopting the Report and Recommendations (Doc. #9). It is further 

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims now stand as presented. These include: 

(1) Racial Discrimination charged against Defendant Harris, in his individual capacity;

(2) Violation of Due Process against Defendant Provitt, in his individual capacity; and (3)

Failure to Properly Train charged against the City of Montgomery. The Court already has

granted Plaintiff adequate opportunity to amend his pleadings. (See Doc. #6, #8, #10). 

Plaintiff has failed to respond to the Court’s most recent order that he file an amended

Complaint. (Doc. #10). The Court will not afford Plaintiff any further opportunity to

amend his complaint. It is further 

ORDERED that Defendants shall file an Answer or Responsive Pleading to

Plaintiff’s Complaint on or before March 9, 2007. 

DONE this 9th day of February, 2007.

/s/ Wallace Capel, Jr.

WALLACE CAPEL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00672-WKW-WC Document 12 Filed 02/09/2007 Page 2 of 2
§ 799.20 Purpose of the ESW. ( a ) FSA uses the ESW as an initial screening tool to evaluate record the use of a categorical exclusion for a proposed action and to determine the required type of environmental review.
( b ) Review with the ESW is not required for proposed actions that are categorically excluded as specified in § 799.31(b) or § 1b.3 of this title, or for proposed actions where FSA determines at an early stage that there is a need to prepare an EA or EIS.
#### § 927.21 Nomination and selection of members and their respective alternates.

Grower members and their respective alternates for each district shall be selected by the Secretary from nominees elected by the growers in such district. Handler members and their respective alternates for each district shall be selected by the Secretary from nominees elected by the handlers in such district. Processor members and their respective alternates shall be selected by the Secretary from nominees elected by the processors. Public members for each committee shall be nominated by the Fresh Pear Committee and the Processed Pear Committee, each independently, and selected by the Secretary. The Fresh Pear Committee and the Processed Pear Committee may, each independently, prescribe such additional qualifications, administrative rules and procedures for selection for each candidate as it deems necessary and as the Secretary approves.
###### Editorial Note on [Subchapter A of Chapter VIII](/current/title-7/chapter-VIII/subchapter-A)

#### Authority:

[7 U.S.C. 71-87K](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/7/71), [1621-1627](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/7/1621).

###### Editorial Note on [Subchapter A of Chapter VIII](/current/title-7/chapter-VIII/subchapter-A)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at [84 FR 45645](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/84-FR-45645), Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 810.1604 Grades and grade requirements for soybeans.

| Grading factors | Grades U. S. Nos. | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| **Maximum percent limits of:** | | | | |
| Damaged kernels: | | | | |
| Heat (part of total) | 0.2 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 3.0 |
| Total | 2.0 | 3.0 | 5.0 | 8.0 |
| Foreign material | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| Splits | 10.0 | 20.0 | 30.0 | 40.0 |
| **Maximum count limits of:** | | | | |
| Other materials: | | | | |
| Animal filth | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 |
| Castor beans | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Crotalaria seeds | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Glass | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Stones1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Unknown foreign substance | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Total2 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| U.S. Sample grade are soybeans that: | | | | |
| (a) Do not meet the requirements for U.S. Nos. 1, 2, 3, or 4; or | | | | |
| (b) Have a musty, sour, or commercially objectionable foreign odor (except garlic odor); or | | | | |
| (c) Are heating or otherwise of distinctly low quality. | | | | |
| 1 In addition to the maximum count limit, stones must exceed 0.1 percent of the sample weight. | | | | |
| 2 Includes any combination of animal filth, castor beans, crotalaria seeds, glass, stones, and unknown foreign substances. The weight of stones is not applicable for total other material. | | | | |

[[88 FR 45056](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/88-FR-45056), July 14, 2023]
§ 948.52 Alternates. ( a ) For each committee member there shall be an alternate who shall have the same qualifications. During a member's absence, or when called upon to do so in accordance with the terms hereof, or in the event of a member's death, removal, resignation, or disqualification, an alternate shall act in his place and stead until the member's successor is selected and has qualified.
( b ) Area committees, with the Secretary's approval, may provide through rules for members or for alternates to recommend regulations for early crop potatoes or for late crop potatoes and to specify the particular crop for which each group shall be responsible.
§ 763.10 Feasibility. ( a ) The buyer's proposed operation as described in a form acceptable to the Agency must represent the operating cycle for the farm operation and must project a feasible plan as defined in § 761.2(b) of this chapter.
( b ) The projected income, expenses, and production estimates: ( 1 ) Must be based on the buyer's last 3 years actual records of production and financial management unless the buyer has been farming less than 3 years;
( 2 ) For those farming less than 3 years, a combination of any actual history and other reliable sources of information may be used. Sources must be documented and acceptable to the Agency; and
( 3 ) May deviate from historical performance if deviations are the direct result of specific changes in the operation, reasonable, justified, documented, and acceptable to the Agency.
( c ) Price forecasts used in the plan must be reasonable, documented, and acceptable to the Agency.
( d ) The Agency will analyze the buyer's business ventures other than the farm operation to determine their soundness and contribution to the operation.
( e ) When a feasible plan depends on income from sources other than from owned land, the income must be dependable and likely to continue.
( f ) When the buyer's farm operating plan is developed in conjunction with a proposed or existing Agency direct loan, the two farm operating plans must be consistent.
#### § 75.20 Submitted sample inspection.

A sample inspection shall be made by testing a sample of seed submitted by an applicant for inspection.
ex101.htm


    
      

      

    

    Exhibit 10.1

     

    

     

    
      
         

      

      
        - 1
-

        
          

        

      

      
         

      

    

     

     

    

     

     

    
      
         

      

      
        - 2
-

        
          

        

      

      
         

      

    

     

     

    

     

     

    
      
         

      

      
        - 3
-

        
          

        

      

      
         

      

    

     

     

    

     

     

    
      
         

      

      
        - 4
-

        
          

        

      

      
         

      

    

     

     

    

     

     

     

    
      
         

      

      
        - 5
-

        
          

        

      

      
         

      

    

     

     

    

     

     

     

    
      
         

      

      
        - 6
-

        
          

        

      

      
         

      

    

     

     

     

    

     

    
      
         

      

      
        - 7
-

        
          

        

      

      
         

      

    

     

     

     

    

     

     

    
      
         

      

      
        - 8
-

        
          

        

      

      
         

      

    

     

     

     

    

     

     

     

    
      
         

      

      
        - 9
-

        
          

        

      

      
         

      

    

     

    

     

     

    
      
         

      

      
        - 10
-
###### Editorial Note on Part 782

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 782 appear at 61 FR 32643, June 25, 1996.

#### § 782.4 OMB control numbers assigned pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act.

The information collection requirements in this part have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget and assigned OMB control number 0560-0151.

[61 FR 32643, June 25, 1996]
Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 28 Filed 04/04/2007 Page 1 of 1
###### Editorial Note on [Subchapter A of Chapter VIII](/current/title-7/chapter-VIII/subchapter-A)

#### Authority:

[7 U.S.C. 71-87K](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/7/71), [1621-1627](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/7/1621).

###### Editorial Note on [Subchapter A of Chapter VIII](/current/title-7/chapter-VIII/subchapter-A)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at [84 FR 45645](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/84-FR-45645), Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 868.257 Milling yield determination.

Milling yield shall be determined by the use of an approved device in accordance with procedures prescribed in FGIS instructions. For the purpose of this paragraph, “approved device” shall include the McGill Miller No. 3 and any other equipment that is approved by the Administrator as giving equivalent results.

Note:

Milling yield shall not be determined when the moisture content of the brown rice for processing exceeds 18.0 percent.

[[42 FR 40869](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/42-FR-40869), Aug. 12, 1977; [42 FR 64356](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/42-FR-64356), Dec. 23, 1977, as amended at [47 FR 34516](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/47-FR-34516), Aug. 10, 1982; [54 FR 21403](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/54-FR-21403), May 18, 1989. Redesignated at [54 FR 21406](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/54-FR-21406), May 18, 1989, and further redesignated at [60 FR 16364](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/60-FR-16364), Mar. 30, 1995]
OFFICIAL BANKRUPTCY FORMS

1. Voluntary Petition

2. Declaration under Penalty of Perjury on Behalf of a Corporation or Partnership

3. Application and Order to Pay Filing Fee in Installments

4. List of Creditors Holding 20 Largest Unsecured Claims

5. Involuntary Petition

6. Schedules

7. Statement of Financial Affairs

8. Chapter 7 Individual Debtor’s Statement of Intention

9. Notice of Commencement of Case under the Bankruptcy Code, Meeting of Creditors, and Deadlines

10. Proof of Claim

11A. General Power of Attorney

11B. Special Power of Attorney

12. Order and Notice for Hearing on Disclosure Statement

13. Order Approving Disclosure Statement and Fixing Time for Filing Acceptances or Rejections of Plan, Combined with Notice Thereof

14. Ballot for Accepting or Rejecting Plan

15. Order Confirming Plan

16A. Caption

16B. Caption (Short Title)

16C. Caption of Complaint in Adversary Proceeding Filed by a Debtor

16D. Caption for Use in Adversary Proceeding other than for a Complaint Filed by a Debtor

17. Notice of Appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 158(a) or (b) from a Judgment, Order or Decree of a Bankruptcy Court

18. Discharge of Debtor

19. Certification and Signature of Non-Attorney Bankruptcy Petition Preparer (See 11 U.S.C. § 110)

20A. Notice of Motion or Objection

20B. Notice of Objection to Claim

Official Forms

[NOTE: These official forms should be observed and used with such alterations as may be appropriate to suit the circumstances. See Federal

Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9009.]
§ 766.60 Canceling a Disaster Set-Aside. The Agency will cancel a DSA if: ( a ) The Agency takes any primary loan servicing action on the loan;
( b ) The borrower pays the current market value buyout in accordance with § 766.113; or
( c ) The borrower pays the set-aside installment.
#### § 906.20 Districts.

For the purpose of determining the basis for selecting producer committee members the following districts of the production area are hereby initially established:

*District No. 1:* The county of Cameron in the State of Texas;

*District No. 2:* The county of Hidalgo in the State of Texas; and

*District No. 3* The county of Willacy in the State of Texas.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

§ 810.1802 Definition of other terms. ( a ) *Cultivated sunflower seed.* Sunflower seed grown for oil content. The term seed in this and other definitions related to sunflower seed refers to both the kernel and hull which is a fruit or achene.
( b ) *Damaged sunflower seed.* Seed and pieces of sunflower seed that are badly ground-damaged, badly weather-damaged, diseased, frost-damaged, heat-damaged, mold-damaged, sprout-damaged, or otherwise materially damaged.
( c ) *Dehulled seed.* Sunflower seed that has the hull completely removed from the sunflower kernel.
( d ) *Foreign material.* All matter other than whole sunflower seeds containing kernels that can be removed from the original sample by use of an approved device and by handpicking a portion of the sample according to procedures prescribed in FGIS instructions.
( e ) *Heat-damaged sunflower seed.* Seed and pieces of sunflower seed that are materially discolored and damaged by heat.
( f ) *Hull (Husk).* The ovary wall of the sunflower seed.
( g ) *Kernel.* The interior contents of the sunflower seed that are surrounded by the hull.
#### §§ 60.120-60.121 [Reserved]
#### § 760.1110 Refunds; joint and several liability.

In the event there is a failure to comply with any term, requirement, or condition for payment or assistance arising under this subpart, and if any refund of a payment to FSA will otherwise become due in connection with this subpart, all payments made in regard to such matter must be refunded to FSA together with interest and late-payment charges as provided for in part 792 of this title, provided that interest will run from the date of the disbursement of the refund to the producer.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2014210EN.01002001.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 17.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 210/20 |

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 774/2014 of 15 July 2014 fixing the import duties in the cereals sector applicable from 16 July 2014

(
[Official Journal of the European Union L 209 of 16 July 2014](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2014_209_R_TOC)
)

On page 53, Annex II, point 1 should read as follows:

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ‘1. | Averages over the reference period referred to in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EU) No 642/2010: | | | | | --- | --- | --- | | (EUR/t) | | | | | Common wheat[(1)](#ntr1-L_2014210EN.01002001-E0001) | Maize | | Exchange | Minneapolis | Chicago | | Quotation | 189,58 | 116,10 | | Gulf of Mexico premium | — | 23,74 | | Great Lakes premium | 66,61 | — | |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-L_2014210EN.01002001-E0001)  Premium of EUR 14/t incorporated (Article 5(3) of Regulation (EU) No 642/2010).’

---
1 The Alternative Motion for Extension was included in Plaintiff’s Response to

Motion to Quash and In The Alternative Motion for Extension. See Doc. 21. 

2 During the May 2, 2007 hearing it was suggested a new motion for extension may

be filed for the District Judge’s consideration. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

LEROY WILLIAMS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO 2:06-cv-658-ID

)

STATE OF ALABAMA DEP’T OF )

TRANSPORTATION, et al., )

 )

Defendants. )

ORDER

Upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion for Protective Order or, In The

Alternative, Motion to Quash Deposition Notices (Doc. 20, filed May 1, 2007) and the oral

arguments of counsel in the hearing on May 2, 2007, it is for good cause

ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Protective Order or, In The Alternative,

Motion to Quash Deposition Notices (Doc. 20, filed May 1, 2007) is hereby DENIED. 

The Alternative Motion for Extension1

 filed by Plaintiff (Doc. 21, filed May 1, 2007)

remains pending before the District Judge in this matter.2

 

DONE this 2nd day of May, 2007.

 

/s/Terry F. Moorer

TERRY F. MOORER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00658-TFM Document 25 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cv-00669-MEF-SRW Document 2 Filed 07/27/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00669-MEF-SRW Document 2 Filed 07/27/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00669-MEF-SRW Document 2 Filed 07/27/2006 Page 3 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

 ______________________________

MARVIN KURT NATION, #141 669 *

Plaintiff, *

v. * 2:06-CV-693-ID

WILLIE AMBERS, et al., *

Defendants. *

 __________________________________

ORDER

As directed by court order, the Department of Corrections has provided the last

known address on file for Defendant Willie Ambers. The Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to

serve Willie Ambers at P. O. Box 231314, Montgomery, Alabama 36123, with a copy of

this order together with a copy of the complaint and the court’s September 7, 2006 order of

procedure. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that Willie Ambers shall file an answer and written report to the

complaint within forty (40) days of the filing date of this order in accordance with the

directives contained in the court’s September 7, 2006 order of procedure. 

Plaintiff is advised that the court will not continue to monitor this case to ensure that

each of the named defendants has been served. This is Plaintiff's responsibility. Plaintiff is

cautioned that if service is not perfected on Defendant Ambers he will not be considered a

Case 2:06-cv-00693-ID-TFM Document 24 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

party to this cause of action and this case will proceed only against those named defendants

on whom service has been perfected. 

Done, this 25th day of October 2006.

/s/ Delores R. Boyd

DELORES R. BOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00693-ID-TFM Document 24 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 2 of 2
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3028 

To suspend temporarily the duty on kashmir. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 24, 2006 

Mr. LIEBERMAN (for himself and Mr. DODD) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on kashmir. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. KASHMIR. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.51.25 Fine animal hair of 

Kashmir (cashmere) 

goats; not processed in 

any manner beyond the 

degreased or carbonized condition (provided for in subheading 

5102.11.10) ................. Free No change No change On or before 12/ 

31/2009 

‘‘ 9902.51.26 Fine animal hair of 

Kashmir (cashmere) 

goats (provided for in 

subheading 

5102.11.90) ................. Free No change No change On or before 12/ 

31/2009 ’’. 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 3028 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
§ 701.23 Eligible costs. ( a ) Cost-share assistance may be authorized for all reasonable costs incurred in the completion of the practice, up to the maximums provided in §§ 701.126, 701.127, and 701.226.
( b ) Eligible costs shall be limited as follows: ( 1 ) Costs for use of personal equipment shall be limited to those incurred beyond the normal operation of the eligible land.
( 2 ) Costs for personal labor shall be limited to personal labor not normally required in the operation of the eligible land.
( 3 ) Costs for the use of personal equipment and labor must be less than that charged for such equipment and labor by commercial contractors regularly employed in such areas.
( 4 ) Costs shall not exceed those needed to achieve the minimum performance necessary to resolve the problem being corrected by the practice. Any costs above those levels shall not be considered to be eligible costs for purposes of calculations made under this part.
( c ) Costs shall not exceed the practice specifications in § 701.112(d) or § 701.212(d) for cost-share calculations.
( d ) The gross amount on which the cost-share eligibility may be computed will not include any costs that were reimbursed by a third party including, but not limited to, an insurance indemnity payment.
( e ) Total cost-share payments from all sources shall not exceed the total of eligible costs of the practice to the applicant.
[69 FR 10302, Mar. 4, 2004, and amended at 75 FR 70088, Nov. 17, 2010]