alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3044 

To suspend temporarily the duty on hydraulic control units. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. HATCH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on hydraulic control units. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HYDRAULIC CONTROL UNITS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.90.01 Hydraulic control units designed for braking systems 

of hybrid motor vehicles of 

heading 8703 (provided for 

in subheading 9032.89.60) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


sroberts on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•S 3044 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
# 5250.104-3 Special procedures for unusually hazardous or nuclear risks.

 (b) Submit requests for authorization to use the          clause prescribed at FAR 50.104-4 with sufficient justification to SECNAV via DASN(P) by          email at usn.pentagon.asstsecnavrdadc.mbx.pabt@us.navy.mil with          the subject “[Activity Name] FAR 50.104-3 – Indemnification Request.”

**Parent topic:**5250.104 Residual powers.
Blueprint






Exhibit 10A-1


 






 


 


 


February
16, 2018


 


Mr.
Joseph Cremonese


PO Box
1907


Greensburg,
PA 15601


 


Dear
Joe:


 


Please
confirm your agreement by signing where indicated below and
returning a copy of this letter that the term of your engagement
and the engagement of Laboratory
Innovation Company, Ltd (collectively, the
“Consultants”)
pursuant to the Fifth Amended and
Restated Consulting Agreement dated January 20, 2012, as
amended and/or extended to date (the “Agreement”), with Scientific
Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) is hereby further
extended to December 31, 2018, subject to earlier termination by
written notice by either the Company or the Consultants delivered
to the other party at least 60 days prior to the termination date
set forth in the written notice.


 

There
are no other changes to the Agreement.

 


	

 

	
Scientific
Industries, Inc.


	

 


	

 

	

 

	

 

	

 


	
 

	
By:  

	
/s/ Helena R.
Santos


	

 


	

 

	

 

	
Helena R.
Santos


	

 


	

 

	

 

	

President and
CEO


	

 











 


 


	

 
Acknowledged and Agreed to:


	
Laboratory
Innovations, Ltd.


	

 


	

 

	

 

	

 

	

 


	
 

	
By:  

	
/s/ Joseph G.
Cremonese


	

 


	

 

	

 

	
Joseph G.
Cremonese
Case 2:06-cv-00668-MHT-DRB Document 2 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00668-MHT-DRB Document 2 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00668-MHT-DRB Document 2 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00668-MHT-DRB Document 2 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 4 of 4
Subpart 231.1 - APPLICABILITY    **Parent topic:** Part 231 - CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES231.100 Scope of subpart.    231.100-70 Contract clause.       Use the clause at                 252.231-7000             , Supplemental Cost Principles, in all solicitations and contracts, which are subject to the principles and procedures described in FAR Subparts 31.1, 31.2, 31.6, and 31.7.          When awarding qualified contracts in conjunction with the conveyance of a utility system under 10 U.S.C. 2688, "Utility Systems: Conveyance Authority," see DoD Class Deviation 2011-O0006, Utilities Privatization –Class Deviation from FAR Part 31, dated March 31, 2011.  This deviation is effective until incorporated into the DFARS or rescinded.
#### § 900.307 Time for voting.

There shall be no voting except within the time specified by the referendum agent as stated in the notice of the referendum.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6580

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

QUINN AUSIDI GOFFIGAN,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:16-cr-00034-RAJ-LRL-1; 

2:17-cv-00504-RAJ)

Submitted: October 5, 2018 Decided: November 7, 2018

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Quinn Ausidi Goffigan, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Quinn Ausidi Goffigan seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A 

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable 

jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a 

constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Goffigan has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 927.28 Alternates for members.

The first alternate for a member shall act in the place and stead of the member for whom he or she is an alternate during such member's absence. In the event of the death, removal, resignation, or disqualification of a member, his or her first alternate shall act as a member until a successor for the member is selected and has qualified. The second alternate for a member shall serve in the place and stead of the member for whom he or she is an alternate whenever both the member and his or her first alternate are unable to serve. In the event that a member of the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee and both that member's alternates are unable to attend a meeting, the member may designate any other alternate member from the same group (handler, processor, or grower) to serve in that member's place and stead.
#### § 58.721 Salt.

Salt shall be free flowing, white refined sodium chloride and shall meet the requirements of The Food Chemical Codex.
#### § 915.32 Annual report.

The committee shall, as soon as practicable after the close of each fiscal year, prepare and mail an annual report to the Secretary, and to each handler and grower who requests a copy of the report. This annual report shall contain at least: (a) A complete review, by districts, of the regulatory operations during the fiscal year; (b) an appraisal of the effect of such regulatory operations upon the avocado industry; and (c) any recommendations for changes in the program.

[19 FR 3439, June 11, 1954, as amended at 22 FR 3513, May 21, 1957. Redesignated at 26 FR 12751, Dec. 30, 1961]
252.215-7004 Requirement for Submission of

Data Other Than Certified Cost or Pricing

Data—Modifications—Canadian Commercial

Corporation.

As prescribed at 215.408 (2)(ii), use the following clause:

REQUIREMENT FOR SUBMISSION OF DATA OTHER THAN CERTIFIED COST OR PRICING

DATA—MODIFICATIONS—CANADIAN COMMERCIAL CORPORATION (OCT 2013)

This clause, in lieu of FAR 52.215-21, applies only if award is to the Canadian Commercial

Corporation.

(a) Submission of certified cost or pricing data is not required.

(b) Canadian Commercial Corporation shall obtain and provide the following for modifications that

exceed the $150,000 [or higher dollar value specified by the U.S. Contracting Officer in the

solicitation].

(i) Profit rate or fee (as applicable).

(ii) Analysis provided by Public Works and Government Services Canada to the Canadian

Commercial Corporation to determine a fair and reasonable price (comparable to the analysis

required at FAR 15.404-1).

(iii) Data other than certified cost or pricing data necessary to permit a determination by the U.S.

Contracting Officer that the proposed price is fair and reasonable [U.S. Contracting Officer to insert

description of the data required in accordance with FAR 15.403-3(a)(1)].

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 252.215 RESERVED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

 UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE

M ONTGOM ERY, ALABAM A

 April 11, 2008 

DEBRA P. HACKETT MAILING ADDRESS:

 CLERK P. O. Box 711

MONTGOMERY, AL 36101

(334)954-3610

Thomas K. Kahn, Clerk

United States Court of Appeals

Eleventh Circuit Re: District Court No. 2:06-cv-00672-WKW

56 Forsyth Street, N.W. ANTHONY BERNARD MOORER V. CITY OF

Atlanta, Georgia 30303 MONTGOMERY, ET AL.

Court of Appeals No. 

 

Enclosed are documents regarding an appeal in this matter. Please acknowledge receipt on the enclosed copy of this letter.

: Certified copy of NOTICE OF APPEAL, docket entries, judgment and opinion/order appealed from. 

: First Notice of Appeal: Yes : No 9 Other notices (dates): 

9 Other: 

: The Judge or Magistrate Judge appealed from is: JUDGE WILLIAM KEITH WATKINS 

9 The Court Reporter (s) is/are: 

9 A hearing was not held in the case. : An audio tape is available for transcription of the court hearing

: The appellant DOCKET FEE has been paid: Yes : No 9 Date paid: 4/10/2008

9 Motion for Certificate of Appealability and/or leave to proceed in forma pauperis is pending.

9 Appellant has been Granted 9 or Denied 9 leave to appeal IFP [In Forma Pauperis]

Enclosed: certified copy of Order & an updated docket sheet

9 Appellant has been Granted 9or Denied 9 the issuance of a Certificate of Appealability

Enclosed: certified copy of Order & an updated docket sheet

9 Copy of CJA form / order appointing counsel.

9 Certified record on appeal consisting of : Volume(s) of pleadings; PSI (s); Volume(s) of

 transcript; Folder(s) of exhibits/depositions; Supplemental file(s)

9 ORIGINAL PAPERS: Volume(s) of pleadings; Volume(s) of transcript; folder of exhibits 

9 This is an appeal of a bankruptcy order. Bankruptcy Judge 

9 This is a DEATH PENALTY appeal.

Very truly yours,

Donna Norfleet

Deputy Clerk

cc: Court file

Case 2:06-cv-00672-WKW-WC Document 42 Filed 04/11/2008 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

January 8, 2007

NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT

Re: D. E. Enterprises, LLC v. Zurich North America

Civil Action No. #3:06-cv-00692-WC

The above-styled case has been reassigned to Judge W. Harold Albritton, III.

Please note that the case number is now #3:06-cv-00692-WHA. This new case number should

be used on all future correspondence and pleadings in this action.

 

Case 3:06-cv-00692-WHA-WC Document 10 Filed 01/08/2007 Page 1 of 1
# Subpart 714.4—Opening of Bids and Award of Contract

**Parent topic:**PART 714—SEALED BIDDING

## 714.407-3 Other mistakes disclosed before award.

The M/OAA Director is the designated central authority to make the determinations described in (48 CFR) FAR 14.407–3. 

## 714.407-4 Mistakes after award.

The M/OAA Director is the designated central authority to make the determinations described in (48 CFR) FAR 14.407–4. 

## 714.408-170 Partner vetting.

If an acquisition is identified as subject to vetting, see (48 CFR) AIDAR 704.70 for the applicable procedures and requirements.
Subpart 5601.1 - PURPOSE, AUTHORITY

ISSUANCE

Parent topic: Part 5601 - THE FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION SYSTEM

5601.101 Purpose.

This United States Special Operations Command Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement

(SOFARS) provides minimum essential implementation of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR),

and DOD FAR Supplement (DFARS).

5601.104 Applicability.

The SOFARS applies to all USSOCOM contracting offices that receive contracting authority from

USSOCOM, Director of Procurement (DOP).

5601.170 Peer Reviews.

(Revised June 2023)

(a) DPC peer reviews. DPC peer reviews are required on all non-competitive acquisitions over $1

billion. DPC peer reviews are required on competitive acquisitions over $1 billion only for major

defense acquisition programs for which the USD(A&S) is the milestone decision authority or

USD(A&S) special interest programs. DPC may still conduct peer reviews for competitive

procurements above $1 billion upon request. Internal reviews should be completed prior to DPC

peer review. Peer reviews are addressed in DFARS 201.170.

(b) DoD independent management reviews of contracts for services IAW section 808 of NDAA for

FY08 are still required. Follow procedures for periodic independent management reviews of

contracts for services consistent with section 808.

(c) DPC Peer Reviews leverage existing reviews; the following 5601-1 reviews serve as the DPC peer

review phases. A list of required documents and elements to be addressed are found in PGI

201.170-4 . Additionally, a peer review checklist is also found in PGI 201.170-4. As a minimum, the

Chief, cognizant LNO, and acquisition legal advisor will serve as reviewers for noncompetitive

actions. As a minimum, the Chief, cognizant LNO, acquisition legal counsel, SSAC-Chair (if

required), and SSA will serve as reviewers for competitive actions.

DPC PREAWARD PEER REVIEWS – COMPETITIVE ACQUISITIONS OF MAJOR

DEFENSE ACQUISITION PROGRAMS WITH USD(A&S) AS MILESTONE DECISION

AUTHORITY AND USD(A&S) SPECIAL INTEREST PROGRAM
DFARS 5601-1 Equivalent

Phase 1 – Prior to issuance of the solicitation Requests for Proposals

Phase 2 – Prior to request for final proposal

revisions (if applicable)

Requests for Final Proposal Revisions (if

applicable)

Phase 3 – Prior to award Contract Clearance

DPC PREAWARD PEER REVIEWS – NONCOMPETITIVE ACQUISITIONS

Phase 1 – Prior to negotiations Business Clearance

Phase 2 – Prior to award Contract Clearance

DPC POSTAWARD PEER REVIEWS – SERVICES ONLY

Base 1-year or less Post Award Peer Reviews – prior to exercise

of each option period

(d) Component peer reviews. Pre-award peer reviews for competitive solicitations valued at less than

$1B and non-competitive solicitations valued at less than $500M must be accomplished by

complying with the RFP, Business, and Contract Clearances requirements defined in SOFARS

5615.001 at the thresholds outlined in 5601-1.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         780,630
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    18,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               798,795
<PP&E>                                       7,082,980
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,343,891
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,537,884
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           95,898
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,441,986
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,537,884
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               559,002
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  313,663
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                58,266
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                198,990
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            198,990
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   198,990
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    12.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    12.60
        

</TABLE>
| | previous issuessun imageSpring 
        2002sun imageWinter 
        2002 sun imageFall 
        2001sun imageSummer 
        2001sun imageWinter/Spring 
        2001 sun imageFall 
        2000sun imageSummer 
        2000sun imageWinter 
        2000sun imageSummer 
        1999sun imageWinter 
        1999sun imageFall 
        1998sun imageSummer 
        1998sun imageSpring 
        1998sun imageWinter 
        1998sun imageFall 
        1997sun imageSummer 
        1997sun imageSpring 
        1997

      Home || Comments || Search || Global Warming Home || US EPAhttp://www.epa.gov/globalwarming/greenhouse/greenhouse17/previous.html
        Last Updated on June 13, 2002
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 2:06-mj-00076-SRW Document 10 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2909 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2909

      To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Nemacur VL.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 19, 2006

   Mr. Burr introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Nemacur VL.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NEMACUR VL.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.02.60 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Nemacur VL) is amended by 
striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

 

RALPH BROWN, * 

 * 

 Plaintiff, * 

 * 

v. * Case Number: 2:06-CV642-MEF 

 * 

CHAMPION ENTERPRISES, INC., et al. * 

 * Unopposed 

 Defendants. * 

 

JOINT STATUS REPORT

 COME NOW the Plaintiff and Champion Home Builders Co., improperly named in the 

Complaint as Champion Home Builders Company, Inc., the remaining Defendant in the above 

matter, by and through counsel and provides the following as the Joint Status Report: 

 1. The parties have reached a firm settlement in the above matter and are in process 

of executing the Settlement Agreement and circulating the General Release. 

 2. It is expected that the above can be accomplished within the next thirty (30) to 

sixty (60) days. 

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the parties pray that the case be stayed 

an additional thirty (30) to sixty (60) days with the understanding the parties will immediately 

dismiss the case once the settlement is consummated, and for such other and different relief as is 

just. 

Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 53 Filed 07/01/2008 Page 1 of 2
Respectfully submitted, 

 

RITCHEY & SIMPSON, PLLC 

/s Gregory S. Ritchey

Gregory S. Ritchey, Esquire {ASB-8193-H68G 

Richard S. Walker, Esquire {ASB-8719-L70R}

Counsel for Champion Home Builders Co., 

improperly named in the Complaint as Champion 

Home Builders Company, Inc. 

OF COUNSEL:

RITCHEY & SIMPSON, PLLC 

The Mountain Brook Center 

2700 Highway 280, Suite 203 West 

Birmingham, AL 35223-2468 

Phone: 205.876.1600 

Facsimile 205.876.1616 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I, the undersigned, do hereby certify that on the 1st day of July 2008, I electronically filed 

the foregoing with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of 

the foregoing upon the following: 

Jere L. Beasley, Esquire 

W. Daniel Miles, III, Esquire 

C. Gibson Vance, Esquire 

C. Lance Gould, Esquire 

Roman A. Shaul 

BEASLEY, ALLEN, CROW, 

METHVIN, PORTIS & MILES, P.C. 

Post Office Box 4160 

Montgomery, AL 36103 

 /s Gregory S. Ritchey 

 OF COUNSEL 

Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 53 Filed 07/01/2008 Page 2 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 13 Filed 09/15/2006 Page 1 of 9
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 13 Filed 09/15/2006 Page 2 of 9
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 13 Filed 09/15/2006 Page 3 of 9
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 13 Filed 09/15/2006 Page 4 of 9
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 13 Filed 09/15/2006 Page 5 of 9
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 13 Filed 09/15/2006 Page 6 of 9
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 13 Filed 09/15/2006 Page 7 of 9
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 13 Filed 09/15/2006 Page 8 of 9
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 13 Filed 09/15/2006 Page 9 of 9
United States Transportation Command Acquisition Regulation Supplement       Issued Fiscal Year 2019 by the:          GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION          DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE          UNITED STATES TRANSPORTATION COMMAND ACQUISITION REGULATIONS SYSTEM                    TITLE#-UNITED STATES TRANSPORTATION COMMAND ACQUISITION REGULATIONS SYSTEM          Chapter#          United States Transportation Command Acquisition Regulation System          Volume #    **Parent topic:** Volume X - Parts xxxx to xxxx