alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ANNEX 15 - UAC/RATIFICATION REPORT

Format . A formatted spreadsheet is available on the website identified at NMCARS 5201.105-3

Copies..

Field Name Description

Ratification Number

The numbering format shall consist of (e.g. First reported FY16

NAVSEA action: N00024-16-UAC-001):

(A) Organization Unit Identification Code-;

(B) FY when UAC reported-;

(C) The acronym ”UAC”-;

(D) A consecutive 3-digit numeric identifier.

Status

Open or Closed. No other entries are acceptable. If an action was

initially reported as a UAC and later determined to not be a

ratification action, the item should be reported as closed.

Date Opened

The date the item was determined to be a UAC. Acceptable dates

include the date: an invoice is received; an employee reports the

action; or, the date the action is determined to be a UAC.

Date Closed

The date the ratification is complete or, if not a ratification, the

date the item is deemed as other than a ratifiable action.

Acceptable dates are the date of the order, contract/modification,

or credit card action.

HCA

The HCA reporting the UAC. Acceptable entries are: HQMC I&L,

MCSC, MSC, NAVAIR, NAVFAC, NAVSEA, NAVSUP,

ONR, NAVWAR, or SSP.

NAVSUP BSO For use by NAVSUP only. All others leave blank.

Person Committing the

UAC The name of the person committing the UAC.

Contractor The name of the contractor performing the UAC.

Contractor’s CAGE The Contractor’s CAGE code.

Previous UAC? Yes or No. Answer based on whether or not the person or contactor

committing or performing the UAC has done so previously.
Disciplinary Action? Yes or No.

Product and Service

Code (PSC)

The applicable PSC associated with the product/service

provided/received in the ratification.

Description A short description of the product/service involved and the

circumstances involved in performing the UAC.

Amount Reported Dollar amount of the reported UAC.

Amount Ratified Dollar amount of the ratification (if ratified).

Contracting Officer Contracting Officer’s name.

Ratifying Official Ratifying Official’s name.

Additional Info Any clarifying or explanatory information deemed necessary by the

reporting activity.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

SOUTHERN DIVISION

NATHAN C. BELL, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 1:06-CV-00644-WKW

)

DARRELL L. SPRAGGINS, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

Upon consideration of the defendant’s Second Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or

Otherwise Respond (Doc. # 4), it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. Defendant shall

answer or otherwise respond on or before October 18, 2006.

DONE this the 19th day of September, 2006.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00644-WKW-SRW Document 5 Filed 09/19/2006 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

M IDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABA M A

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

NOTICE OF CORRECTION

From: Clerk’s Office

Case Style: Parker v. Givens et al 

Case Number: 2:06-cv-00649-WHA

Referenced Pleading: Notice of Removal - Doc. 1

This Notice of Correction was filed in the referenced case this date to correct the PDF

documents attached to this notice. Please see the correct PDF documents to this notice.

Case 2:06-cv-00649-WHA-WC Document 14 Filed 09/21/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cv-00649-WHA-WC Document 14-2 Filed 09/21/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00649-WHA-WC Document 14-2 Filed 09/21/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00649-WHA-WC Document 14-2 Filed 09/21/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00649-WHA-WC Document 14-2 Filed 09/21/2006 Page 4 of 4
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3048 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3048

         To reduce temporarily the duty on certain transaxles.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

   Mr. Hatch introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To reduce temporarily the duty on certain transaxles.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN TRANSAXLES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.87.02      Transaxles,         1.5%         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         incorporating an                                                   31/2009
                         integral
                         electronic
                         controller, the
                         foregoing
                         designed for use
                         in hybrid motor
                         vehicles of
                         heading 8703
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         8708.40.20)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
52.229-14 Taxes—Foreign Contracts in

Afghanistan (North Atlantic Treaty

Organization Status of Forces Agreement).

As prescribed in 29.402-4(b), use the following clause:

Taxes—Foreign Contracts in Afghanistan (North Atlantic Treaty Organization Status of Forces

Agreement) (Nov 2021)

(a) Definition. North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Forces, as used in this clause, means the

Members of the Force, Members of the Civilian Component, NATO Personnel and all property,

equipment, and materiel of NATO, NATO Member States, and Operational Partners present in the

territory of Afghanistan.

(b) Tax exemption. This acquisition is covered by the Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) entered

into between NATO and the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan (Afghanistan) issued on September 30,

2014, and entered into force on January 1, 2015.

(1) The SOFA exempts NATO Forces and its contractors and subcontractors (other than those that

are Afghan legal entities or residents) from paying any tax or similar charge assessed by the

Government of Afghanistan within Afghanistan if the activities are on behalf of or in support of

NATO Forces. The SOFA also exempts the acquisition, importation, exportation, reexportation,

transportation, and use of supplies and services in Afghanistan on behalf of or in support of NATO

Forces from all Afghan taxes, customs, duties, fees, or similar charges.

(2) The Contractor shall exclude any Afghan taxes, customs, duties, fees or similar charges from the

contract price, other than those charged to Afghan legal entities or residents.

(3) Afghan citizens employed by NATO contractors and subcontractors are subject to Afghan tax

laws. To the extent required by Afghan law, the Contractor shall withhold tax from the wages of

these employees and remit those withholdings to the appropriate Afghan taxing authority. These

withholdings are an individual's liability, not a tax against the Contractor.

(c) Subcontracts. The Contractor shall include the substance of this clause, including this paragraph

(c), in all subcontracts including subcontracts for commercial products or commercial services.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.229 [Reserved]
| 1. | This      annual report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the year ended December      31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the      “report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Registrant. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/        Matt      J. Colbert                              |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|             Matt      J. Colbert         |
|             Chief      Financial Officer |

----
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2710 

To temporarily suspend the duty on dog leashes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 4, 2006 

Mrs. LINCOLN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To temporarily suspend the duty on dog leashes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DOG LEASHES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.42.03 Dog leashes (provided for in 

subheading 4201.00.30) ...... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 2710 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
#### § 956.1 Secretary.

*Secretary* means the Secretary of Agriculture of the United States or any officer or employee of the Department of Agriculture who has been delegated, or to whom authority may hereafter be delegated, the authority to act for the Secretary.
#### Trojan Contracting Company, Inc., Respondent, v. City of Troy, Appellant.

Motion for a stay pending appeal denied as unnecessary, without costs. (See CPLR 5519, subd. [a], par. 1; *Union Free School Dist. No. 7, Town of Greenburgh*v. *Allen,*30 A D 2d 629, mot. for lv. to app. den. 22 N Y 2d 644; *Hacker*v. *City of New York,*25 A D 2d 35, 37.) Respondent may, if so advised, move pursuant to CPLR 5519 (subd. [c]) to vacate, limit or modify the automatic statutory stay obtained by appellant. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Greenblott, JJ., concur.
#### § 82.9 Inspection and certification of diversion.

When the removal of the clingstone peach trees is complete, the grower will notify the CCPA on a form provided by the CCPA. The CCPA will certify that the trees approved for removal from the acreage have been removed, and notify AMS.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

§ 868.308 Percentages. ( a ) *Rounding.* Percentages are determined on the basis of weight and are rounded as follows: ( 1 ) When the figure to be rounded is followed by a figure greater than or equal to 5, round to the next higher figure; e.g., report 6.36 as 6.4, 0.35 as 0.4, and 2.45 as 2.5.
( 2 ) When the figure to be rounded is followed by a figure less than 5, retain the figure, e.g., report 8.34 as 8.3 and 1.22 and 1.2.
( b ) *Recording.* The percentage of broken kernels removed by a 5 plate in U.S. Nos. 1 and 2 Milled Rice and the percentage of objectionable seeds in U.S. No. 1 Brewers Milled Rice is reported to the nearest hundredth percent. The percentages of all other factors are recorded to the nearest tenth of a percent.
[54 FR 21406, May 18, 1989. Redesignated at 60 FR 16364, Mar. 30, 1995]
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 259 

To require that Federal forfeiture funds be used, in part, to clean up 

methamphetamine laboratories. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2005 

Mr. JOHNSON (for himself and Mr. THOMAS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require that Federal forfeiture funds be used, in part, 

to clean up methamphetamine laboratories. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Emergency 

5 Meth Lab Cleanup Funding Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FUNDING FROM TREASURY FORFEITURE FUND. 

7 Chapter 97 of title 31, United States Code, is amend8 ed— 

9 (1) by redesignating section 9703 (as added by 

10 Public Law 103–62) as section 9703A; 
2 

•S 259 IS

1 (2) by moving section 9703 (as added by Public 

2 Law 102–393) so as to appear after section 9702; 

3 and 

4 (3) in section 9703(a)(1), by adding at the end 

5 the following: 

6 ‘‘(K)(i) Payment to the designated State, 

7 local, or tribal law enforcement, environmental, 

8 or health entity for experts and consultants 

9 needed to clean up any area formerly used as 

10 a methamphetamine laboratory. 

11 ‘‘(ii) If a methamphetamine laboratory is 

12 located on private property, not more than 90 

13 percent of the costs may be paid only if— 

14 ‘‘(I) the property owner did not have 

15 knowledge of the existence or operation of 

16 such laboratory before the law enforcement 

17 action to close it; or 

18 ‘‘(II) the property owner notifies law 

19 enforcement not later than 24 hours after 

20 discovering the existence of such labora21 tory.’’. 

Æ
**COURT OF APPEALS**

**TENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS**

****

January 29, 2015

No. 10-15-00014-CV

MERCURY COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

v.

CALLIE HAYMAN, INDIVIDUALLY & AS THE NATURAL DAUGHTER OF DON EDWARD HAYMAN, DECEASED, & AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF DON EDWARD HAYMAN, DECEASED & JAMES BRADLEY RANDLEMAN, INDIVIDUALLY & AS THE NATURAL SON OF PATRICIA ROSE HAYMAN, DECEASED, & AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF PATRICIA ROSE HAYMAN DECEASED, & JAMES ORION LEONARD

From the 361st District Court

Brazos County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13-00156-CV

**JUDGMENT**

	The Petition for Permission to Appeal Interlocutory Order has been considered by the Court.  The petition is denied.  Because the Court denied the petition, it does not have jurisdiction of the appeal, and therefore, it is the judgment of this Court that the appeal is dismissed.  	

	It is further ordered that Callie Hayman, individually and as the natural daughter of Don Edward Hayman, deceased, and as representative of the Estate of Don Edward Hayman, deceased; James Bradley Randleman, individually and as the natural son of Patricia Rose Hayman, deceased, and as representative of the Estate of Patricia Rose Hayman, deceased; and James Orion Leonard are awarded judgment against Mercury County Mutual Insurance Company for Callie Hayman’s, individually and as the natural daughter of Don Edward Hayman, deceased, and as representative of the Estate of Don Edward Hayman, deceased; James Bradley Randleman’s, individually and as the natural son of Patricia Rose Hayman, deceased, and as representative of the Estate of Patricia Rose Hayman, deceased; and James Orion Leonard’s appellate costs that were paid, if any, by Callie Hayman, individually and as the natural daughter of Don Edward Hayman, deceased, and as representative of the Estate of Don Edward Hayman, deceased; James Bradley Randleman, individually and as the natural son of Patricia Rose Hayman, deceased, and as representative of the Estate of Patricia Rose Hayman, deceased; and James Orion Leonard; and all unpaid appellate court cost, if any, is taxed against Mercury County Mutual Insurance Company.

	A copy of this judgment will be certified by the Clerk of this Court and delivered to the trial court clerk for enforcement.

							PER CURIAM

****SHARRI ROESSLER, CLERK

						By:    Nita Whitener			

							Deputy Clerk

Mercury County Mutual Insurance Company v. Hayman	Page 2

# image1.png

# image2.png
# L_2014267EN.01000601.xml

| 6.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 267/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 267/6

---

POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION EUAM UKRAINE/1/2014

of 24 July 2014

on the appointment of the Head of Mission of the European Union Advisory Mission for Civilian Security Sector Reform Ukraine (EUAM Ukraine)

(2014/644/CFSP)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 38 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2014/486/CFSP of 22 July 2014 on the European Union Advisory Mission for Civilian Security Sector Reform Ukraine (EUAM Ukraine) (1), and in particular Article 7(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Decision 2014/486/CFSP, the Political and Security Committee is authorised, in accordance with Article 38 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purpose of exercising the political control and strategic direction of the European Union Advisory Mission for Civilian Security Sector Reform Ukraine (EUAM Ukraine), including the decision to appoint a Head of Mission. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Decision 2014/486/CFSP, the Political and Security Committee is authorised, in accordance with Article 38 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purpose of exercising the political control and strategic direction of the European Union Advisory Mission for Civilian Security Sector Reform Ukraine (EUAM Ukraine), including the decision to appoint a Head of Mission.

| (2) | On 23 July 2014, the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy proposed the appointment of Mr Kalman MIZSEI as Head of Mission of EUAM Ukraine for a period of one year from 1 August 2014 to 31 July 2015, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 23 July 2014, the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy proposed the appointment of Mr Kalman MIZSEI as Head of Mission of EUAM Ukraine for a period of one year from 1 August 2014 to 31 July 2015,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Kalman MIZSEI is hereby appointed Head of Mission of the European Union Advisory Mission for Civilian Security Sector Reform Ukraine (EUAM Ukraine) for a period of one year from 1 August 2014 to 31 July 2015.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 24 July 2014.

For the Political and Security Committee

The Chairperson

W. STEVENS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 217, 23.7.2014, p. 42.

1

---
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statement No. 333-140007 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 3, 2009, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule of Guidance Software, Inc. and subsidiaries (which report expresses anunqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs regarding changes in the manner in which Guidance Software, Inc. and subsidiaries, account for share based compensation in 2006 and uncertainty in income taxes in 2007), and the effectivenessof Guidance Software, Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Guidance Software, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2008. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Los Angeles, California 

March 3, 2009
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

M IDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABA M A

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

 DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

 

August 16, 2006

NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT

RE: Robert D. Brooks et al et al v. Pactiv Corporation et al

Civil Action No. 2:06cv00680-MHT

The above-styled case has been reassigned to District Judge Lyle E. Strom. 

Please note that the case number is now 2:06cv00680-LES. This new case

number should be used on all future correspondence and pleadings in this action.

Sincerely,

Sheryl K. Lent

Deputy Clerk

Case 2:06-cv-00680-LES-CSC Document 6 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### Harry W. Taber, Appellant, v Barbara G. Livingston, Respondent.

(Appeal No. 1.)

Appeal unanimously dismissed. Memorandum: During the trial of this proceeding appellant withdrew his petition, refused to go forward with his proof and stipulated to an order of settlement on the merits which was entered on the record. Under the circumstances, no appeal lies from the order (see 7 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, par 5511.10). (Appeal from order of Monroe Supreme Court — support and other actions.) Present—Simons, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Callahan, Doerr and Moule, JJ.
# 32.1106 EFT mechanisms.

(S-90) *Delivery Ticket Invoicing (DTI).* The DTI contract payment method may be applied against firm fixed price contracts or Communication Service Authorization (CSA) orders for telecommunications services in which the receiving document, when combined with the contract/order, contains sufficient information to determine a contractor's payment entitlement, without requiring the contractor to submit an invoice. A Contracting Officer who determines to implement the DTI contract payment method in a contract or order shall follow the DTI Standard Operating Procedures located in the Corporate Library.

**Parent topic:**SUBPART 32.11 —ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFER
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06mj72-MEF

)

JOSHUA WAYNE HESTER )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the Defendant’s Motion to Continue (Doc. #13), filed on

August 7, 2006, it is hereby 

ORDERED that the motion is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that the time of the

hearing is changed from 10 a.m. to 1 p.m.

DONE this the 10th day of August, 2006.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-mj-00072-DRB Document 15 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Outdoor Channel Holdings, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, William A. Owen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to thebest of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.

 
| /s/ William A. Owen     |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| **William A. Owen**     |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| November 14, 2005  |

 

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to Outdoor ChannelHoldings, Inc. and will be retained by Outdoor Channel Holdings, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
Fig. 1 (2010) 

0

4

8

12

16

0 25 50

CES1 mRNA

Age (days) 

r = 0.717 (P = 0.003) 

CES1 mRNA

0

10

20

30

40

*

*

*

* * **

1 2 3 4 5 

1 = 1-31 days; 2 = 35-70 days 

3 = 89-119 days; 4 = 188-332 

days; 5 = adult (>18 year) 

CES1 mRNA

0

8

16

24

32

0 50 100 150 200

r = 0.499 (P < 0.001) 

Age (days) 

A 

B 

C 
Fig. 2 (2010) 

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

CES1 Protein

1 2 3 4 5 

1 = 1-31 days; 2 = 35-70 days 

3 = 89-119 days; 4 = 188-332 

days; 5 = adult (>18 year) 

CES1

GAPDH

*

*

* * **

* *

0

16

32

48

012

CES1 mRNA

CES1 Protein 

r = 0.470 (P = 0.001) 

A 

B