alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3166 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Methyl 3-(trifluoromethyl)benzoate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. BOND introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Methyl 3- 

(trifluoromethyl)benzoate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. METHYL 3-(TRIFLUOROMETHYL)BENZOATE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.29.15 Methyl 3-(trifluoromethyl)benzoate (CAS 

No. 2557–13–3) (provided for in subheading 2916.39.45) ................................ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•S 3166 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Centenary International
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Hector A. Patron Costas, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Hector A. Patron Costas
--------------------------------
Hector A. Patron Costas
Chief Executive Officer
March 2, 2006

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
      other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
      signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
      written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
      the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff upon request. The foregoing certifications are accompanying the
      Company's Form 10-QSB solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title
      18, United States Code) and are not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB
      or as a separate disclosure document.


                                       13
§ 760.1814 Requirement to purchase crop insurance or NAP coverage. ( a ) For the first 2 consecutive crop years for which crop insurance or NAP coverage is available after the enrollment period for the QLA Program ends, a participant who receives payment under this subpart for a crop loss in a county must obtain: ( 1 ) For an insurable crop, crop insurance with at least a 60 percent coverage level for that crop in that county; or
( 2 ) For a NAP-eligible crop, NAP coverage with a coverage level of 60 percent.
( b ) Participants who exceed the average adjusted gross income limitation for NAP payment eligibility[1] for the applicable crop year may meet the purchase requirement specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section by purchasing Whole-Farm Revenue Protection crop insurance coverage, if eligible, or paying the NAP service fee and premium even though the participant will not be eligible to receive a NAP payment due to the average adjusted gross income limit.
( c ) The final crop year to purchase crop insurance or NAP coverage to meet the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section is the 2023 crop year.
( d ) A participant who obtained crop insurance or NAP coverage for the crop in accordance with the requirements for WHIP+ in § 760.1517 is considered to have met the requirement to purchase crop insurance or NAP coverage for the QLA Program.
( e ) If a producer fails to obtain crop insurance or NAP coverage as required in this section, the producer must reimburse FSA for the full amount of QLA Program payment plus interest. A producer will only be considered to have obtained NAP coverage for the purposes of this section if the participant submitted a NAP application for coverage and paid the requisite NAP service fee and any applicable premium by the applicable deadline and completed all program requirements required under the coverage agreement, including filing an acreage report.
Footnotes -
760.1814
[1] See §§ 1400.500(a) and 1400.1(a)(4) of this title.
#### William S. Conrad *vs.*Jacob Dobmeier.

Argued April 26, 1894.

Affirmed May 4, 1894.

No. 8655.

New trial, for inadequate damages.

When the jury find a verdict in favor of the plaintiff which determines issues in his favor that entitle him to substantial damages, but the jury award him only nominal damages, *hold*it is not error in the court below to set aside the verdict, and grant a new trial.

Appeal by defendant, Jacob Dobmeier, from an order of the District Court of Crow Wing County, *G. W. Holland,*J., made August 9, 1893, • granting a new trial under 1878 G-. S. ch. 66, § 253, as amended by Laws 1891, ch. 80, for inadequate and insufficient damages appearing to have been given under the influence of passion or prej'udice.

*Bangs & Fisk*and *True d Neal,*for appellant.

*McClenahan & Mantor,*for respondent.

Canty, J.

Plaintiff held a mortgage on a certain brewery, and the land on which it was situated. The mortgagor conveyed to defendant, and plaintiff foreclosed his mortgage. During the year of redemption the brewery was burned, reducing the value of the premises to a small part of the sum for which they had been sold on the foreclosure sale. Afterwards, and before the year to redeem expired, plaintiff and defendant entered into an agreement whereby plaintiff agreed to loan defendant $1,000, and whereby defendant agreed to mortgage some real estate he owned in Dakota to plaintiff to secure the payment of the same, and also to build a brewery of *148certain dimensions on the site of the former brewery; and plaintiff agreed, on full performance by defendant, to convey the foreclosed premises to defendant when the time to redeem expired, and to take back a mortgage for the amount of the indebtedness arising under said first-named mortgage. This agreement was made on the 29fch of March, 1892, and, on the 22d of May following, defendant wrote plaintiff, refusing to build the brewery or perform the contract, and plaintiff brought this suit for damages. The jury on the trial found a verdict for plaintiff for one dollar. The court, on motion, granted a new trial, and defendant appeals.

We are of the opinion that there was clearly no abuse of discretion in setting aside the verdict. Plaintiff was entitled to substantial damages, or else he was not entitled to a verdict at all. The jury found all the issues in his favor except the amount of damages, and the court below did right in setting the verdict aside.

Order affirmed.

Buck, J., absent, sick, took no part.

(Opinion published 58 N. W. 870.)
EXHIBIT 35.3
                  SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                           HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL, LLC
             RALI SERIES 2006-QS14 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of Homecomings  Financial,  LLC, as
servicer (the "Servicer") pursuant to the applicable  servicing agreement,  does
hereby certify that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under  the   applicable   servicing   agreement  has  been  made  under  my
     supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing  agreement
     in all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:      /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title:    Managing Director
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
LEAF Equipment Income Fund III, L.P. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Crit S. DeMent, Chief
Executive Officer of the General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|              |  |  |  |                        
|------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|              |  | 
|April 1, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Crit S. DeMent     
|              |  |  |  | Crit S. DeMent         
|              |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 16, 2016

No. 04-16-00644-CV

UTILITY TRAILER SALES SOUTHEAST TEXAS, INC.,

Appellant

v.

Hector L. LOZANO and Mary E. Short,

Appellees

From the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CVT003881 D3

Honorable Rebecca Ramirez Palomo, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant's motion for extension of time to file brief is hereby GRANTED. Time is 

extended to December 5, 2016.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 16th day of November, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
SUBPART 209.1-- RESPONSIBLE PROSPECTIVE CONTRACTORS     **Parent topic:** PART 9 –– CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS209.104-1 General standards.    (g)(i) *Ownership or control by the government of a country that is a state sponsor of terrorism. (*See DARS 225.771-4)       (g)(ii) *Ownership or control by a foreign government when access to proscribed information is required.*       (B) Submit the request for advice to thePL21, Contract Policy Branch to serve as the liaison between DISA and Deputy Director, DPC/ Contract Policy and International Contracting (CPIC).       (C) Submit waiver request to the PL21, Contract Policy Branch to serve as the liaison between DISA and DPC.
Fourth Department,

April, 1969

(April 3, 1969)

#### City of Buffalo, Respondent, v. Joseph Davis, Inc., et al., Appellants.

Final decree unanimously modified on the law and the facts in accordance with memorandum and as so modified, affirmed, with costs to appellant Joseph Davis, Inc., Memorandum: These are appeals by the owner and tenant from a decree directing condemnation. We affirm the award made to the tenant for the value of certain trade fixtures which it had the right to remove and *605had so intended upon termination of the lease and for which compensation was properly fixed. *(City of Buffalo*v. *Michael,*16 N Y 2d 88). Since other fixtures were not intended to be removed, their value was properly included in the award to the owner. The tenant’s leasehold was terminated by operation of the lease and no additional compensation therefor was justified. In arriving at a value for the building, it was proper ,to use the income capitalization method *(Marjal Realty Corp.*v. *State of New York,*23 A D 2d 941) but we are unable to agree with the value arrived at by the court wherein reliance was given to the testimony of .the city’s appraiser who considered only the actual rental without giving consideration to the property’s depressed rental value caused by the impending condemnation announced several years earlier by the plaintiff. (See *Matter of City of New York [Lincoln Sq. Slum Clearance Project],*15 A D 2d 153, affd. 16 N Y 2d 497; *City of Buffalo*v. *Irish Paper Co.,*31 A D 2d 470.) The owner’s award should be modified by increasing it to $146,300, a value which is based on a proper income capitalization method and which finds support in the record. (Appeals from final decree of Erie Special Term; in condemnation proceeding.) Present— Goldman, P. J., Witmer, Gabrielli, Moule and Henry, JJ.
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 21 Filed 11/13/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 21 Filed 11/13/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 21 Filed 11/13/2006 Page 3 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 21-2 Filed 11/13/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 21-2 Filed 11/13/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 21-2 Filed 11/13/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 21-2 Filed 11/13/2006 Page 4 of 4
# SUBCHAPTER C - CONTRACTING METHODS AND CONTRACT TYPES

- PART 413 - SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES 
- PART 414 - SEALED BIDDING 
- PART 415 - CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION 
- PART 416 - TYPES OF CONTRACTS 
- PART 417 - SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS 
- PART 418 [RESERVED] 

- PART 413 - SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES     - Subpart 413.3 - Simplified Acquisition Methods     - 413.301   Governmentwide commercial purchase card.
    - 413.306   SF 44, Purchase Order-Invoice-Voucher.
    - 413.307   Forms.
- PART 414 - SEALED BIDDING    - Subpart 414.2 - Solicitation of Bids     - 414.201   Preparation of invitations for bids.
    - 414.201-6   Solicitation provision.
  - Subpart 414.4 - Opening of Bids and Award of Contract     - 414.404   Rejection of bids.
    - 414.404-1   Cancellation of invitations after opening.
    - 414.407   Mistakes in bids.
    - 414.407-3   Other mistakes disclosed before award.
    - 414.407-4   Mistakes after award.
    - 414.409   Information to bidders.
    - 414.409-2   Award of classified contracts.
- PART 415 - CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION     - Subpart 415.2 - Solicitation and Receipt of Proposals and Information     - 415.204   Contract format.
    - 415.207   Handling proposals and information.
    - 415.209   Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.
  - Subpart 415.3 - Source Selection     - 415.303   Responsibilities.
    - 415.305   Proposal evaluation.
  - Subpart 415.4 - Contract Pricing     - 415.404-4   Profit.
  - Subpart 415.5 - Preaward, Award, and Postaward Notifications, Protests and Mistakes     - 415.570   Post-award conference.
  - Subpart 415.6 - Unsolicited Proposals     - 415.604   Agency points of contact.
    - 415.606   Agency procedures.
- PART 416 - TYPES OF CONTRACTS    - 416.000   Scope of part.
  - Subpart 416.2 - Fixed-Price Contracts     - 416.203   Fixed-price contracts with economic price adjustment.
    - 416.203-4   Contract clauses.
  - Subpart 416.4 - Incentive Contracts     - 416.405   Cost-reimbursement incentive contracts.
    - 416.405-2   Cost-plus-award-fee contracts.
    - 416.406   Contract clauses.
    - 416.470   Solicitation provision.
  - Subpart 416.5 - Indefinite-Delivery Contracts     - 416.505   Ordering.
    - 416.506   Solicitation provision and contract clauses.
  - Subpart 416.6 - Time-and-Materials, Labor-Hour, and Letter Contracts     - 416.603   Letter contracts.
    - 416.603-2   Application.
    - 416.603-4   Contract clauses.
    - 416.670   Contract clauses.
  - Subpart 416.7 - Agreements     - 416.702   Basic agreements.
- PART 417 - SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS    - Subpart 417.2 - Options     - 417.204   Contracts.
- PART 418 [RESERVED]
# 249.7001 Congressional notification on significant contract terminations.

The contracting officer shall obtain coordination from legal counsel, the CoCO, the HCO, the OSBP (if the action involves a small business), and approval from the HCA prior to the release of any termination notice under this section.

**Parent topic:**SUBPART 249.70 — SPECIAL TERMINATION REQUIREMENTS
| 1. | This      annual report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the year ended      December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission      (the “report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Registrant. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ John P. Ryan             |
|------------------------------|
| John      P. Ryan            |
| Chief      Executive Officer |

----
Part 221 - RESERVED

Parent topic: Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

RANDY JAMES JANGULA,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Nos. 10-30044 & 10-30045

D.C. Nos. 4:02-cr-00048-SEH

 4:03-cr-00038-SEH

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2010** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated cases, Randy James Jangula appeals from the 24-

month sentence imposed following the revocation of his supervised release. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

JAN 04 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-30044 & 10-30045

Jangula contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable. In light of

the totality of the circumstances, the district court’s sentence is substantively

reasonable. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 993 (9th Cir. 2008) (en

banc). Moreover, the district court did not procedurally err. See id. 

AFFIRMED.
BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.
June 20, 2013

INTRA-ALASKA SERVICE MAIL RATES ..**t~** -··-·

ERAAVIATION, d/b/a ERAALASKA ) ) ) ) ) ) Docket OST-2003-14694 Docket OST-2003-14695



# _____________________________)

• NOTICE OF EQUALIZATION OF ERA AVIATION, INC. (dba Era Alaska)

Era Aviation d/b/a Era Alaska, a certificated air carrierwith authorityto transport U.S. mail within the State ofAlaska, hereby provides notice ofit intent and match, on a total rate per pound, the lower rates or combination of rates now in effect or hereafter prescribed and paid to Everts, Northern Air Cargo and PenAirfor each category ofmail ittransports between Anchorage and Aniak, effective immediately. In support ofthe Notice, Era Aviation states the following: 1) Era Aviation and its' affiliated carriers operate a variety ofaircraft and as such are subjectto the rates paid for Part 121 Bush, Part 135 Bush and Mainline with regards to mail tendered to them underthe Era Aviation, Inc. DOT code of7H. 2) Order 90-10-34 provides that air carriers may electto establish a reduced charge equal to the charge prescribed for mail transportation actually being performed between the same origin and destination points by any other certificated air carrier or combination ofcarriers, regardless of routing 3) Subjectto the condition as below, Era Aviation givesthis notice ofelection to equalize and match on atotal rate per pound basis, the lowest rate or combination of rates now in effect or hereafter prescribed and paid to Everts, Northern Air Cargo and PenAir. For each category ofmail ittransports between Anchorage and Aniak. Era Aviation elects to equalize in this marketto any lower rate or combination of rates prescribed and paid in the future to any other carrier or carriers. 4) Rate equalization underthis notice is immediately effective and will remain in effect until terminated by written notice filed at leastten (10) days in advance ofsuch termination; provided, however, thatthis rate equalization notice ceases to beeffective when and so long as a lower rated service orcombination ofservices is not offered between Anchorage and Aniak or not utilized by the United States Postal Service for mail transportation. WHEREFORE, Era Aviation give(s) this notice ofequalization ofits mail rates and requests equitable tender ofmail in this market pursuantto the practices and procedures ofthe Department ofTransportation and the United States Postal Service. Respectfully,

Bob Hajdukivuch CEO Era Alaska, dba Era Aviation Communication with respect to this documentshould be addressed to: Paul Hendrickson Era Aviation Dir. Postal Affairs 4700 International Airport Road Anchorage, Alaska 99502 907-266-8424

Certificate of Service Bob Hajdukovich Era Aviation CEO 4700 International Airport Road Anchorage, Alaska 99502 907-266-8300

I hereby certify that a copy ofthe forgoing Notice of Equalization of Era Aviation has been served this Jun 21 5\ 2013 upon each ofthe following addresses:
**Exhibit 32.1  **CERTIFICATION OF**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the quarterly report of Canandaigua National Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George W. Hamlin, IV,  President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer  of the Company, do hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:**** 
1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act************
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

PHILLIP A. WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 4:20-cv-390-AW-MAF

U.S. DEP’T OF JUSTICE, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Having considered the magistrate judge’s October 23, 2020 Report and 

Recommendation, ECF No. 8, to which no objections have been filed, I now 

conclude that the case should be dismissed. The Report and Recommendation is 

adopted and incorporated into this order. The clerk will enter a judgment that says, 

“This case is dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court 

orders.” The clerk will then close the file.

SO ORDERED on November 24, 2020. 

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00390-AW-MAF Document 9 Filed 11/24/20 Page 1 of 1