alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY

ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Eye Care centers of America, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 29, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David L. Holmberg, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

May 9, 2008



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|/s/ David L. Holmberg                    
|David L. Holmberg Chief Executive
Officer

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO EYE CARE CENTERS OF
AMERICA, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY EYE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
10.002 Procedures.

(b)(2)

(ix) The contracting officer shall document and attach the results of the SBA Dynamic Small

Business Search tool at http://dsbs.sba.gov/dsbs/search/dsp_dsbs.cfm to the Market Research Report

and forward with the DD Form 2579 to OSBP for review. Assistance is available from the OSBP when

seeking potential sources.

(x) Post procurement notices to Contract Opportunities including SSNs or RFIs. (See DARS 19.202

(S-93)(2)(3)).

(A) A RFI is used to develop requirements and make decisions regarding acquisition strategies when

limited or no acquisition history is available and when industry input is required. When an RFI is

planned, allow for the following:

(1) Posted on Contract Opportunities for at least 21 business days to ensure maximum participation

by small business concerns.

(2) Use the approved DISA RFI template at DARS PGI 10.001(b).

(B) A SSN is used when there is a known requirement with a previous procurement history, or a

well-defined new requirement. When a SSN is planned, allow for the following:

(1) Posted on Contract Opportunities for a minimum of 14 calendar days to ensure maximum

feedback.

(2) Use the approved DISA SSN template at DARS PGI 10.001(b).

(S-90) Except for the issuance of a SSN or RFI, market research is primarily the responsibility of the

program office or the requiring activity. Market research documentation must be complete,

unbiased, and supported by facts, not more than 12 months old (for award of contracts other than

task or delivery orders) and provided as part of the requirements package. Include the market

research report in the contract file.

(S-91) Market Research Report (MRR) templates are located in DARS PGI 10.002(S-91).

Table 10-1 MRR Template Type

Dollar

Threshold Procurement Action Template Type

<SAT Competitive Procurements

equal to or under SAT

Market Research Report (Equal to

or Under SAT)

(Enclosure 14d)

>SAT Competitive Service

Procurements over SAT

Market Research Report (Services)

(Enclosure 14a)
>SAT One-time Competitive Product

Purchase over SAT

Market Research Report (Product

Purchases only)

(Enclosure 14b)

(Note: If requirement covers

multiple years of product buys, use

Encl 14a)

Any Amount Exercise 52.217-9 Options

Market Research Report (Option

Exercise)

(Enclosure 14c)

Any Amount Sole Source

Market Research Report (Sole

Source)

(Enclosure 14e)

Any Amount Sole Source Direct 8(a)

Market Research Report (Sole

Source 8(a))

(Enclosure 14f)

(S-92) Exceptions to Market Research Report.

(1) Undefinitized Contract Actions (UCA)

(2) Bridge Contract Actions

(3) 52.217-8 Options

(S-93) F or DISA-only requirements, the contracting officer shall email the final, signed, and

redacted Market Research Report to the Market Research Repository mailbox at DISA Ft Meade BD

Mailbox MRR.

Parent topic: PART 10 – MARKET RESEARCH
Exhibit 31.1

Certificate Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of
                   1934 of the Principal Executive Officer

I, Larry J. Lenhart, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Transforma Acquisition
Group Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

   (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant?s internal
control over financial reporting.

Dated March 22, 2007



                                            /s/Larry J. Lenhart
                                            -------------------
                                      Name:    Larry J. Lenhart
                                     Title:    Principal Executive Officer
#### § 923.70 Personal liability.

No member or alternate member of the committee and no employee or agent of the committee shall be held personally responsible, either individually or jointly with others, in any way whatsoever, to any person for errors in judgment, mistakes, or other acts, either of commission, or omission, as such member, alternate, employee, or agent, except for acts of dishonesty, willful misconduct, or gross negligence.
Subpart 1329.1 - General

Parent topic: PART 1329 - TAXES

1329.101 Resolving tax problems.

Legal questions relating to tax issues should be referred to the Procurement Counsel.
### May 6, 2014
SecretaryAnthony Foxx U.S. DepartmentofTransportation 

### 1200 NewJerseyAvenue, SE Washington, DC 

### 20590 Via e-mail EAS@dot.gov

RE: Docket DOT-OST-2008-0299

Dear Secretary Foxx, Jordan ImplementCo. 1280EMainStreet Brawley, CA92227 760-344-3322

I write to express my concerns with the Department ofTransportation'sTentative Orderto terminate the Essential Air Service (EAS) program in the El Centro, California area in Imperial County with Seaport Airlines. I urge you to considerthe negative economic impacts that may occur as a result ofthe proposed termination ofthe program.

When the decision was made in late 

### 2012 or early 

### 2013 to replace United Express with SeaportAirlines, I made a concerted effortto talk to all ofthe local politicians and Chamber of Commerce members and directors that I could reach to express my displeasure with the replacement of United Express and LAX with Seaport. The local airservice for El Centro was and would continue to be critical to businesses both within and beyond Imperial County ifwe had service to a better airportthan Burbankwith Seaport. Burbank has relatively poor connections with all major airlines thatfly out ofthere. In addition, flying to the San Diego airport and going through the commuterterminal there is probably worse than Burbank. In addition, it has only been recently that Seaport has finalized inter-line agreements with Alaska Airlines, and thatyear-long delay also led to a decline in enplanements atthe Imperial County Airport.

Since my last United Express flight out of Imperial on February 

### 22, 2013, I have personally made 

### 22 enplanements from Yuma, Arizona or San Diego, California that I would have made out of Imperial County Airport had we had better service. On most ofthese trips, I had at least one and usuallytwo or more employees traveling with me. Besides the obvious inconvenience and lost time thatthese out ofarea trips to the airport caused me, there was the additional frustration thatwasteful use ofgasoline, parking fees and other expenses were leaving this economically distressed area. Imperial County has experienced the highest unemployment rate in the nation for many years. I would preferto have local money stay here.

As you prepare the Final Order, I would urge you to reconsider and have your departmenttry to workwith either improving Seaport's connecting airports, or attempting to bring back United Express with a lower subsidy level, but notto terminate the much needed Essential Air Service program for Imperial County Airport.

Thankyou for your consideration ofthis request. Sincerely,

Robert D. Conway General Manager Jordan Implement Co. Brawley, California 

### 92227 rconway@jordanimplement.com
722.810 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.       (a) The contracting officer must insert the clause at 752.222–70, USAID Disability Policy in section I of all solicitations and resulting contracts.          (b) The contracting officer must insert the clause at 752.222–71, Nondiscrimination in section I of all solicitations and resulting contracts    **Parent topic:** Subpart 722.8—Equal Employment Opportunity
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richard C. Stanin, Appellant.

Motion for summary reversal and other relief granted to extent that matter is remitted to Monroe Supreme Court for disclosure of presentence report to appellant and prosecuting attorney except for part or parts excepted by sentencing court in its discretion pursuant to CPL 390.50 (subd 2). (See *People v Rogers,*54 AD2d 616.)
217.7505 Limitations on price increases.

This section provides implementing guidance for Section 1215 of Pub. L. 98-94 (10 U.S.C. 2452

note).

(a) The contracting officer shall not award, on a sole source basis, a contract for any centrally

managed replenishment part when the price of the part has increased by 25 percent or more over

the most recent 12-month period.

(1) Before computing the percentage difference between the current price and the prior price, adjust

for quantity, escalation, and other factors necessary to achieve comparability.

(2) Departments and agencies may specify an alternate percentage or percentages for contracts at

or below the simplified acquisition threshold.

(b) The contracting officer may award a contract for a part, the price of which exceeds the limitation

in paragraph (a) of this section, if the contracting officer certifies in writing to the head of the

contracting activity before award that—

(1) The contracting officer has evaluated the price of the part and concluded that the price increase

is fair and reasonable; or

(2) The national security interests of the United States require purchase of the part despite the price

increase.

(c) The fact that a particular price has not exceeded the limitation in paragraph (a) of this section

does not relieve the contracting officer of the responsibility for obtaining a fair and reasonable price.

(d) Contracting officers may include a provision in sole source solicitations requiring that the offeror

supply with its proposal, price and quantity data on any government orders for the replenishment

part issued within the most recent 12 months.

Parent topic: Subpart 217.75 - ACQUISITION OF REPLENISHMENT PARTS
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the annual report of Global Health Ventures Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hassan Salari, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  August 24, 2011





By:       /s/ Hassan Salari


Hassan Salari


President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, Treasurer, Director


(Principal Executive Officer)
Subpart 5233.1 - PROTESTS

Parent topic: Part 5233 - PROTESTS, DISPUTES, AND APPEALS

5233.103 Protests to the agency.

(d)(4) HCAs are responsible for establishing procedures for handling requests made by interested

parties for an independent review of their protest at a level above the contracting officer. In

addition, for purposes of this paragraph, a “level above the contracting officer” means the CCO or, if

the CCO is less than two levels higher than the contracting officer, the Chief of the next higher

contracting office. An individual so designated who has been personally and substantially involved

with the procurement shall recuse himself or herself and, instead, refer the matter to another

appropriate official at a comparable or higher level.

(f) For purposes of this paragraph, a “level above the contracting officer” means the CCO or, if the

CCO is less than two levels higher than the contracting officer, the Chief of the next higher

contracting office. An individual so designated who has been personally and substantially involved

with the procurement shall recuse himself or herself and, instead, refer the matter to another

appropriate official at a comparable or higher level.

5233.104 Protests to GAO.

(g) HCAs shall consult with DASN(P) before any final decision is reached not to implement GAO's

recommendations. Concurrent with the submission to the Comptroller General, a copy of the report

shall be provided to DASN(P) by email at usn.pentagon.asstsecnavrdadc.mbx.pabt@us.navy.mil with

the subject “[Activity Name] FAR 33.104 – GAO Protest Recommendation Decision.”

5233.170 Briefing requirement for protested acquisitions

valued at $1 billion or more.

Within 5 days of receipt of the protest, submit the required protest notice to DASN(P) by email at

usn.pentagon.asstsecnavrdadc.mbx.pabt@us.navy.mil with the subject “[Activity Name] PGI 233.170

- Protest [solicitation or contract number, as appropriate].”
#### In the Matter of Fred F. Heller, Petitioner, v Gordon M. Ambach, as New York State Commissioner of Education, et al., Respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (initiated in this court pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 6510 of the Education Law) to review an order of the Commissioner of Education revoking petitioner’s license to practice pharmacy. The petitioner admittedly violated the laws of the State of New Jersey in regard to the conduct of a pharmacy owned and operated by him in that State. As a result of such violation, he was convicted upon his plea of guilty of three criminal acts in New Jersey. Subsequently, the petitioner was charged in New York with unprofessional conduct based upon the transactions to which he had pleaded guilty, the conviction of crimes in New Jersey and upon the result of administrative proceedings undertaken in New Jersey in regard to his license to practice pharmacy in that State. All of petitioner’s alleged misconduct involved the handling and sale of codeine cough substances. It is well established that the holders of New York State licenses to practice a particular profession are subject to having their conduct in any other State form the basis of an administrative proceeding in this State for the purpose of suspending or revoking their license to practice *(Matter of Miles v Nyquist,*60 AD2d 133, mot for lv to app dsmd 44 NY2d 789). The petitioner contends that the crimes to which he pleaded guilty in New Jersey would not be crimes in New York and so may not be relied upon to establish unprofessional conduct (citing Education Law, § 6509, subd [5], par [c]). However, he raised no such issue at the administrative level and did not even deem it appropriate to answer the charges either orally or in writing. Accordingly, we deem the allegation now raised as waived. In any event, the unprofessional conduct of the petitioner is well established by the evidence in this proceeding and any error as to a particular count of the charges is not sufficient to warrant a remittal to the respondents. The petitioner contends that the revocation of his license was not warranted by the circumstances of his case and that this court should modify the punishment imposed. A review of his indiscriminate sale of controlled drugs compels the conclusion that revocation of his license to practice is not excessive punishment and is justified for the protection of the public (see *Matter of Pell v Board of Educ.,*34 NY2d 222). Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
#### § 93.2 Definitions.

Words used in the regulations in this subpart in the singular form will import the plural, and vice versa, as the case may demand. As used throughout the regulations in this subpart, unless the context requires otherwise, the following terms will be construed to mean:

*Acid.* The grams of total acidity, calculated as anhydrous citric acid, per 100 grams of juice or citrus product. Total acidity is determined by titration with standard sodium hydroxide solution, using phenolphthalein as indicator.

*Brix or degrees Brix.* The percent by weight concentration of the total soluble solids of the juice or citrus product when tested with a Brix hydrometer calibrated at 20 °C (68 °F) and to which any applicable temperature correction has been made. The Brix or degrees Brix may be determined by any other method which gives equivalent results.

*Brix value.* The pure sucrose or soluble solids value of the juice or citrus product determined by using the refractometer along with the “International Scale of Refractive Indices of Sucrose Solutions” and to which the applicable correction for acidity is added. The Brix value is determined in accordance with the refractometer method outlined in the Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL, Volumes I & II.

*Brix value/acid ratio.* The ratio of the Brix value of the juice or citrus product, in degrees Brix, to the grams of anhydrous citric acid per 100 grams of juice or citrus product.

*Brix/acid ratio.* The ratio of the degrees Brix of the juice to the grams of anhydrous citric acid per 100 grams of the juice.

*Citrus.* All plants, edible parts and commodity products thereof, including pulp and juice of any orange, lemon, lime, grapefruit, mandarin, tangerine, kumquat or other tree or shrub in the genera *Citrus, Fortunella,* or *Poncirus* of the plant family Rutaceae.

*Recoverable oil.* The percent of oil by volume, determined by the bromate titration method after distillation and acidification as described in the current edition of the Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL, Volumes I & II.

[61 FR 51351, Oct. 2, 1996, as amended at 65 FR 64316, Oct. 26, 2000]
1329.303 Application of State and local taxes

to government contractors and

subcontractors.

The designee authorized to review a proposed designation of a contractor as an agent of the

Government is set forth in CAM 1301.70.

Parent topic: Subpart 1329.3 - State and Local Taxes
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: F AA - 2013 - 0208 Directorate Identifier: 2012 - NM - 204 -AD
A320 - 55 - 1042 --- 8/19/11

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-03-198-CV

MANUEL RODRIGUEZ D/B/A A&M CONCRETE	APPELLANT

	V.

JIM JOHNSON HOMES, INC.	APPELLEE

	----------

	FROM THE 17th DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered the “ Motion By Appellant To Dismiss Appeal.”  It is the court's opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

	Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

								PER CURIAM	

PANEL D:	GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

DELIVERED: April 15, 2004
APPENDIX D - RESERVED Table Of Contents           **Parent topic:** Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation
§ 900.116 Award. ( a ) An award shall be made within ten days after the close of the hearing. ( 1 ) The award shall be in writing and shall cover only points of dispute raised in the submission.
( 2 ) The arbitrator, in making the award, may use his own technical knowledge in addition to the evidence submitted by the parties.
( 3 ) The award shall state the period during which it shall be in effect, said period to be not less than thirty days from the effective date thereof; and said period may be extended by agreement among the parties upon notification thereof to the Administrator, unless or until the Administrator withdraws his approval.
( 4 ) The arbitrator shall sign the award in the presence of a notary public, or, when more than one arbitrator is designated the arbitrator shall sign in the presence of each other.
( 5 ) Copies of the award shall be delivered to the parties by the Division.
( b ) [Reserved]