alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31(ii)
                                 --------------


                                 CERTIFICATIONS
                                 --------------

I, Steve Bailey, certify that:


      1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
            10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
            report on Form 10-K of Alternative Loan Trust 2006-OA17 (the
            "Exchange Act periodic reports");

      2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
            whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
            omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
            in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
            not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
            information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
            covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
            reports;

      4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
            servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance review(s)
            conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement(s) required
            in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
            disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer(s) have
            fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all
            material respects; and

      5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
            criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
            reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
            asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
            accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
            13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
            except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
            of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
            this report on Form 10-K.

      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
      information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank
      of New York, as Trustee and Residential Funding Company, LLC.

Date: March 27, 2007


       /s/ Steve Bailey
       ----------------------------
       Steve Bailey
       Senior Managing Director, Loan Administration
inuvoincamendment14signe







DocuSign Envelope ID: 1D9E7F0E-D127-4F13-925C-9912E870EAC7 2/28/2018 Director Abraham Aucamp 2/27/2018 Timothy Lemmon Executive Vice President





 






DocuSign Envelope ID: 1D9E7F0E-D127-4F13-925C-9912E870EAC7
§ 923.14 District. *District* means the applicable one of the following described subdivisions of the production area, or such other subdivisions as may be prescribed pursuant to § 923.31(m): ( a ) *District 1* shall include the Counties of Chelan, Okanogan, Douglas, Grant, Lincoln, Spokane, Pend Oreille, Stevens, and Ferry.
( b ) *District 2* shall include the counties of Kittitas, Yakima, Klickitat, Benton, Adams, Franklin, Walla Walla, Whitman, Columbia, Garfield and Asotin.
[22 FR 3835, June 1, 1957. Redesignated at 26 FR 12751, Dec. 30, 1961, as amended at 66 FR 58356, Nov. 21, 2001]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3278 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3278

         To suspend temporarily the duty on mini DVD camcorder.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 26, 2006

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on mini DVD camcorder.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MINI DVD CAMCORDER.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.85.25        Mini-DVD camcorder,     Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           full multiformat                                                  31/2009          ''
                           readability with                                                                    .
                           patented laser
                           processor technology;
                           1.3 mega pixel CCD,
                           optical zoom, USB 2.0
                           PC (provided for in
                           subheading
                           8525.40.80)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT

Re: David Finney v. Nissan North America, Inc., et al.

 Civil Action No. 3:06-cv-622-SRW

The above-styled case has been reassigned to District Judge W. Keith

Watkins.

Please note that the case number is now 3:06-cv-622-WKW. This new case

number should be used on all future correspondence and pleadings in this

action.

 

Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 17 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### Elizabeth Lazaros, Respondent, v. Spiros S. Lazaros, Appellant.

Order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered April 6, 1966, reversed, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements, and plaintiff’s motion denied. In our opinion, triable issues of fact have been raised by the affidavits in this action *570to recover the amount of an alleged loan. *Inter alia,*one singificant issue is whether the delivery of the cheek by the plaintiff to the defendant was, in fact, made pursuant to an agreed loan transaction between the parties. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Babin and Benjamin, JJ., concur; Hopkins, J., dissents and votes to affirm the order and judgment appealed from.
Subpart 5146.5 - Acceptance **Parent topic:** Part 5146 - Quality Assurance5146.501 General.    Include acceptance documentation as a permanent part of the contract file prior to contract closure.5146.503 Place of acceptance.    When contemplating destination acceptance in solicitations and contracts, contracting officers shall—       (1)  Verify the Department of Defense Activity Address Code (DoDAAC) of each receiving activity in the solicitation or contract (DoDAAC verification information is available via the Internet at https://www.transactionservices.dla.mil/daasinq/);       (2)  Prior to assigning acceptance responsibility, ensure that there is a registered acceptor available in Wide Area Workflow (WAWF) for each destination acceptance point (WAWF acceptor information is available at https://wawf.eb.mil  under “Active DoDAACs and Roles”);       (3)  When no WAWF acceptor is available at destination, use source acceptance or “acceptance at other” in WAWF;       (4)  Not designate destination acceptance at a contractor location, but shall instead clearly designate a Government acceptance point within Section E of the contract schedule; and       (5)  Clearly define the acceptance procedures in Section E.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3260 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3260

    To suspend temporarily the duty on plastic lamp-holder housings 
                          containing sockets.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 26, 2006

Mr. Frist (for Mrs. Dole) introduced the following bill; which was read 
             twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on plastic lamp-holder housings 
                          containing sockets.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN PLASTIC LAMP-HOLDER HOUSINGS CONTAINING SOCKETS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.85.32        Plastic lamp-holder     Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           housings containing                                               31/2009          ''
                           sockets (provided for                                                               .
                           in subheading
                           8536.61.00)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2858 

To reduce temporarily the duty on acrylic or modacrylic synthetic staple 

fibers, not carded, combed, or otherwise processed for spinning. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 19, 2006 

Mr. BURR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on acrylic or modacrylic 

synthetic staple fibers, not carded, combed, or otherwise 

processed for spinning. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ACRYLIC OR MODACRYLIC SYNTHETIC STAPLE 

4 FIBERS, NOT CARDED, COMBED, OR OTHER5 WISE PROCESSED FOR SPINNING. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 2858 IS 

‘‘ 9902.10.20 Synthetic staple fibers, not 

carded, combed, or otherwise 

processed for spinning: 

acrylic or modacrylic (provided for in subheading 

5503.30.00) ......................... 3.7% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
#### Alexander I. Oppenheim, Respondent, v. Daniel Melnick et al., Appellants.

Order of Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 8, 1968, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. The notice of appeal states that the appeal is also from a judgment entered on April 8, 1968. To that extent the appeal is dismissed, without costs. The record on - appeal contains no judgment and, so far as appears, no judgment has been entered. Brennan, Acting P. J., Benjamin, Munder, Martuscello and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-2/February%202013/P-13-0225/p130225c.eng.txt[3/8/2013 10:14:32 AM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0224 , 0225 Focus Ready Draft 2/4/2013 ENGINEER: Arnold \ REC PV (kg/yr):
SUBMITTER:file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-2/February%202013/P-13-0225/p130225c.eng.txt[3/8/2013 10:14:32 AM] SAT (concerns) (01/25/2013): Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info: Migration to groundwater: negl - low PBT rating: P1B1T2 . Health: 1-2 Drinking Water, Inhalation Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 390 ppb) OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 0-1 NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS: None.
EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0224 , 0225 Processing/Use: Number of Sites/ Location: 1 unknown site Days/yr: 278file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-2/February%202013/P-13-0225/p130225c.eng.txt[3/8/2013 10:14:32 AM] ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium. Water or Incineration or Landfill Conservative: 3.6E-1 kg/site-day over 278 days/yr from 1 site or 10.0E+1 kg/yr

Water or Incineration or Landfill High End: 1.9E+0 kg/site-day over 80 days/yr from 1 site or 1.5E+2 kg/yr

RELEASE TOTAL 2.5E+2 kg/yr - all sites
OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARYfile:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-2/February%202013/P-13-0225/p130225c.eng.txt[3/8/2013 10:14:32 AM]
Order entered November 20 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 14
- 00877
- CR No. 05
- 14
- 00878
- CR No. 05
- 14
- 00879
- CR No. 05
- 14
- 00880
- CR REGINALD KEITH PINK, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

### ORDER

By letter dated November 5, 2014, the Court notified appellant that if he wished to file a pro se response to the Anders brief filed by counsel, the response was due by January 5, 2015. The Court now has before it appellant’s November 19, 2014 request for an extens ion of time until February 4, 2015. Appellant states that he has had the record since September 10, 2014, but that his limited research time and legal knowledge require the additional thirty days. Because appellant’s response is not due for nearly six we eks, we DENY the November 19, 2014 extension request without prejudice to appellant filing a second request on January 5, 2015 explaining why he could not meet the specified deadline.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by first

- class mail, t o Reginald Pink, TDCJ No. 1938997, McConnell Unit, 3001 South Emily Drive, Beeville, Texas 78102.We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to counsel for all parties.
/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 2 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 1 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 2 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 2 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 2 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 3 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 2 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 4 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 2 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 5 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 2 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 6 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 2 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 7 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 2 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 8 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 2 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 9 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 2 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 10 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 2 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 11 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 2 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 12 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 2 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 13 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 2 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 14 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 2 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 15 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 2 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 16 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 2 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 17 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 2 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 18 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 2 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 19 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 2 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 20 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 2 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 21 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 2 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 22 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 2 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 23 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 2 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 24 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 2 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 25 of 25
# 5116.603-3 Limitations.

The head of the contracting activity shall make the determination stated in FAR 16.603-3.  See Appendix GG for further delegation.

**Parent topic:**5116.603 Letter contracts.
#### § 945.15 Pack.

*Pack* means a quantity of potatoes in any type of container and which falls within specific weight limits or within specific grade and/or size limits, or any combination thereof, recommended by the committee and approved by the Secretary.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

DAVID W. JAHN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-623-MEF

)

REGINALD JAMES WASHINGTON, )

)

Defendants. )

RULE 26(f) ORDER

The parties are hereby reminded of the obligation, imposed by Rule 26(f) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to confer and to develop a proposed discovery plan. The

Rule 26(f) report containing the discovery plan shall be filed as soon as practicable but not

later than September 14, 2006.

The longstanding practice in this district is that dispositive motions shall be filed no

later than 90 days prior to the pretrial date. If the parties seek to vary from that schedule,

they should present, in the plan, specific case related reasons for the requested variance.

This case will be set for trial before the undersigned judge during one of that judge's

regularly scheduled civil trial terms. The pretrial date is normally set within four to six

weeks of a scheduled trial term. The dates of each judge's civil trial terms are available on

the court's website located at http://almd.uscourts.gov in the civil case information section.

This court may or may not hold a scheduling conference before issuing a scheduling

order. If the court holds a scheduling conference, counsel may participate in the scheduling

Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 4 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

conference by conference call.

The scheduling order entered by the court will follow the form of the Uniform

Scheduling Order adopted by the judges of this court. The Uniform Scheduling Order is also

available on the court's website.

The report of the parties should comply with Form 35 of the Appendix of Forms to

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

DONE this 22nd day of August, 2006.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 4 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 2 of 2
Subpart 5613.1 - PROCEDURES

Parent topic: Part 5613 - SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES

5613.106 Soliciting Competition, Evaluation of Quotations

or Offers, Award and Documentation.

5613.106-1 Soliciting Competition.

(Revised December 2015)

(b)(1) The simplified acquisition file shall contain documentation of the approval for restricting

competition to single small or large business source prior to synopsis when it is required in

accordance with FAR 5.101 , or when an exception under FAR 5.202 is applicable.

(c)(1)(iii) Document the simplified acquisition file with a statement justifying why the synopsis

requirements of FAR 5.202 do not apply on actions over $10,000. The Contracting Officer shall

approve the justification prior to soliciting bids.
§ 760.1106 Payment calculation. ( a ) Preliminary, unadjusted LCP payments are calculated for a producer by multiplying the national payment rate for each livestock category, as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, by the number of eligible livestock for the producer in each category. The national payment rate represents the cost of the amount of corn needed to maintain the specific livestock for 30 days, as determined by FSA. As provided in subpart K of this part, a producer may receive benefits for only one of the three program years, 2005, 2006, or 2007. The producer must indicate which year has been chosen. Payments are available only with respect to disaster-related fees losses in the period from January 2, 2005 through February 27, 2007, in eligible counties for losses during the times specified for the disaster periods as specified in § 760.1001(b).
( b ) The preliminary LCP payment calculated in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section: ( 1 ) For 2005 LCP provided for under this subpart will be reduced by the amount the participant received for the specific livestock under the Feed Indemnity Program in accordance with subpart D of this part and LCP for the 2005 hurricanes under subpart B of part 1416 of this title; and
( 2 ) For 2006 LCP under this subpart will be reduced by the amount the participant received for the same or similar loss under the Livestock Assistance Grant Program in accordance with subpart H of this part.
( c ) Subject to such other limitations as may apply, including those in paragraph (b) of this section, the payment under the 2005-2007 LCP may not exceed for the relevant year chosen by the producer the smaller of either the: ( 1 ) Payment calculated in paragraph (a) of this section for that year; or
( 2 ) Value of the producer's eligible feed loss, increased feed costs, or forage or grazing loss as determined by FSA for that year.
( d ) The actual payment to the producer will be the amount provided for in paragraph (c) of this section subject to the adjustments and limits provided for in this section or in this part.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Azim Hall, Appellant.

Submitted July 16, 2007;

decided September 6, 2007

Reported below, 39 AD3d 100.

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Robert S. Dean, Esq., Center for Appellate Litigation, 74 Trinity Place, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10006 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.