alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for Prudential-Bache Equitec Real Estate
                    and is qualified in its entirety by reference
                    to such financial statements
</LEGEND>

<RESTATED>
<CIK>               0000757191
<NAME>              Prudential-Bache Equitec Real Estate
<MULTIPLIER>        1

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1999

<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-1-1999

<PERIOD-END>                    Sep-30-1999

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos

<CASH>                          1,956,000

<SECURITIES>                    0

<RECEIVABLES>                   19,000

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                0

<PP&E>                          0

<DEPRECIATION>                  0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,975,000

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           318,000

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      1,657,000

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,975,000

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0<F1>

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0<F1>

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0<F1>

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    0<F1>

<EPS-BASIC>                   0<F1>

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0
<FN>
<F1>
Registrant adopted the liquidation basis of accounting
on April 1, 1999, and, accordingly, does not reflect
operations subsequent to April 1, 1999. See Note A
to the financial statements for further details.
</FN>

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Walter Thomas Asta, Appellant, v. John T. Deegan, as Warden of Sing Sing Prison, Respondent.

In a habeas corpus proceeding, relator appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered January 6, 1969, which dismissed the writ. Appeal dismissed as moot, without costs. Relator having been released from custody pending this appeal is not restrained in his liberty and is not entitled to a writ of habeas corpus (CPLR 7002, subd. [a]). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Munder, Kleinfeld, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
5125.7703-2 Determination requirements.

(b)(2)(i) The head of the contracting activity is authorized to make the determination at DFARS

225.7703-2(b)(2)(i). See Appendix GG for further delegation.

Parent topic: 5125.7703 Enhanced authority to acquire products or services from Afghanistan.
tN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF'ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

DAVrD W. JAHN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) Civil Action No.: 2:06-cv-623

)

REGINALD JAMES WASHINGTON, )

individually and GSC ENTERPRISES, )

INC., dlbla GROCERY SUPPLY )

COMPAI¡-Y, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

PLAINTIF'F'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS'

MOTION F'OR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Comes now the Plaintiff in the above-styled cause and responds to Defendants'

Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the grounds of wantonness and negligent

entrustment and states as follows:

1. Plaintiff will stipulate to dismissal of the wantonness and negligent

entrustrnent allegations contained in the Complaint.

Respectfully submitted this the l lth day of July, 2007.

COCHRAN, CHERRY, GIVENS,

SMITH, LANE & TAYLOR, P.C.

/s/ Terrv G. Kev

Terry G. Key (KEY-011)

Christy L. Hayes (FIAY-058)

Attomeys for Plaintiff

Post Office Box927

Dothan" Alabama 36302

Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 37 Filed 07/11/2007 Page 1 of 2
CERTIF'ICATE OF SERYICE

I hereby certifu that on this the 1Ift day of July, 2007, a copy of the foregoing has

been served upon all counsel of record via electronic mail and/or U.S. Mail to the following:

John V/. Clark, Jr., Esq.

Eric D. Bonner, Esq.

Clark, Oncale, Halrr &. Smith, P.C.

Post Offrce Box530467

Birmingham, AL 36253

/s/ Terrv G. Key

Of Counsel

Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 37 Filed 07/11/2007 Page 2 of 2
§ 955.20 Establishment and membership. ( a ) There is hereby established a Vidalia Onion Committee, consisting of nine members, to administer the terms and provisions of this part. Eight members shall be producers, and one shall be a public member. At least four of the producer members shall be producer-handlers. Each member shall have an alternate who shall have the same qualifications as the member.
( b ) Each member, other than the public member, shall be an individual who is, prior to selection and during such member's term of office, a resident of the production area and a grower or an officer or employee of a grower.
( c ) The public member shall be a resident of the production area and shall have no direct financial interest in the commercial production, financing, buying, packing or marketing of Vidalia onions, except as a consumer, nor shall such person be a director, officer or employee of any firm so engaged.
Exhibit








                                                       Exhibit 10.47
  CONFIDENTIAL
Patrick Guo
Shanghai, China 
February 29, 2012 
Dear Patrick:


This letter of understanding will confirm our mutual agreement relative to the terms and
conditions applicable to your international assignment extension to your current Letter of Understanding dated March 26, 2007.


The terms and conditions of your current assignment letter dated March 26, 2007 remain in effect. This letter provides an extension date for your assignment in Shanghai, China through between 3-5 years, July 1, 2015-July 1, 2017.
If questions should arise concerning any provision of this Letter or any subsequent revisions of policies applicable to employees on international assignment, you are urged to consult with Terri Meyer of the Global Management Assignment Services, Chicago, Illinois at (312) 665-2579.


Sincerely yours,




   	
				
	 
	 
	By: /s/
	Barbara Kluth

	 
	 
	Name:
	Barbara Kluth

	 
	 
	Title:
	Sr. Vice President, Global Human Resources








DISTRIBUTION:
Rex Abercrombie (Tenneco)
  Danny Pollaris (Tenneco)
  Terese Meyer (KPMG)


Acknowledge and Concur


  	
		
	By: /s/
	Patrick Guo








Return one copy to:      Barbara Kluth        and    Therese Meyer
  Tenneco Inc            KPMG    
  500 North Field Drive        303 E. Wacker Drive
Lake Forest, IL 60045        Chicago, IL 60601
# Subpart 5233.1 - PROTESTS

**Parent topic:**Part 5233 - PROTESTS, DISPUTES, AND APPEALS

## 5233.103 Protests to the agency.

   (d)(4) HCAs are responsible for establishing procedures for handling requests made by interested parties for an independent review of their protest at a level above the contracting officer. In addition, for purposes of this paragraph, a “level above the contracting officer” means the CCO or, if the CCO is less than two levels higher than the contracting officer, the Chief of the next higher contracting office. An individual so designated who has been personally and substantially involved with the procurement shall recuse himself or herself and, instead, refer the matter to another appropriate official at a comparable or higher level. 

   (f) For purposes of this paragraph, a “level above the contracting officer” means the CCO or, if the CCO is less than two levels higher than the contracting officer, the Chief of the next higher contracting office. An individual so designated who has been personally and substantially involved with the procurement shall recuse himself or herself and, instead, refer the matter to another appropriate official at a comparable or higher level.

## 5233.104 Protests to GAO.

 (g) HCAs shall consult with DASN(P) before any          final decision is reached not to implement GAO's recommendations. Concurrent with the          submission to the Comptroller General, a copy of the report shall be provided to DASN(P) by          email at usn.pentagon.asstsecnavrdadc.mbx.pabt@us.navy.mil with the subject          “[Activity Name] FAR 33.104 – GAO Protest Recommendation Decision.”

## 5233.170 Briefing requirement for protested acquisitions valued at $1 billion or more.

 Within 5 days of receipt of the          protest, submit the required protest notice to DASN(P) by email at usn.pentagon.asstsecnavrdadc.mbx.pabt@us.navy.mil with the subject          “[Activity Name] PGI 233.170 - Protest [solicitation or contract number, as appropriate].”
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles Johnson, Appellant.

[815 NYS2d 136]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Rosenwasser, J.), rendered June 29, 2004, convicting him of burglary in the second degree and petit larceny, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress his statements to law enforcement officials.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the County Court properly denied that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress his statements to the police. The factual findings and credibility determinations of the County Court following a suppression hearing are entitled to great deference on appeal and will not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(see People v Tissiera,*22 AD3d 611 [2005]; *People v Myers,*17 AD3d 699, 700 [2005]; *People v Leggio,*305 AD2d 518, 519 [2003]). The record here amply supports the court’s determination to credit the testimony of the detective and to reject the testimony of the defendant, who claimed, inter alia, that during the interrogation, he was tired and under the influence of drugs and alcohol, and was not advised of his *Miranda*rights *(see Miranda v Arizona,*384 US 436 [1966]; *People v Harris,*134 AD2d 369 [1987]; see *also People v King,*183 AD2d 785, 786 [1992]; *People v Auxilly,*173 AD2d 627, 628-629 [1991]).

*604The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt is unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt *{see People v Schermerhorn,*283 AD2d 524, 525 [2001]; *People v Arias,*270 AD2d 354 [2000]; *People v Soto,*216 AD2d 337 [1995]; *People v Wright,*129 AD2d 600 [1987]; *see also People v McClam,*173 AD2d 861 [1991]). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see*CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Adams, J.P., Mastro, Fisher and Covello, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Rose Pines et al., Appellants, v. Joel Zebrowitz et al., Respondents.

Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 26, 1968, affirmed, without costs. On the record before us, it cannot be said that the denial of plaintiffs’ motion was an abuse of discretion. Beldoek, P. J., Brennan, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
March 2004 Page 1 of 1 

About Harmful Algal Blooms 

BACKGROUND 

Algae are vitally important to marine and fresh-water ecosystems, and most species of algae are not 

harmful. However, a harmful algal bloom (HAB) can occur when certain types of microscopic algae 

grow quickly in water, forming visible patches that may harm the health of the environment, plants, or 

animals. HABs can deplete the oxygen and block the sunlight that other organisms need to live, and some

HAB-causing algae release toxins that are dangerous to animals and humans. HABs can occur in marine, 

estuarine, and fresh waters, and HABs appear to be increasing along the coastlines and in the surface 

waters of the United States, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 

Responding to this suspected increase, the U.S. Congress in 1998 passed a law that required NOAA to 

lead an Inter-Agency Task Force on Harmful Algal Blooms and Hypoxia, and funded research into the 

origins, types, and possible human health effects of HABs. 

ASSESSING THE IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 

Although scientists do not yet understand fully how HABs affect human health, authorities in the United 

States and abroad are monitoring HABs and developing guidelines for HAB-related public health action. 

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has added certain algae associated with HABs to its 

Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List. This list identifies organisms and toxins that EPA believes 

are priorities for investigation. 

CDC works with public health agencies, universities, and federal partners to investigate how the 

following algae, which can cause HABs, may affect public health: 

 Cyanobacteria, also known as blue-green algae, can produce toxins that may taint drinking water 

and recreational water. Humans who drink or swim in water that contains high concentrations of 

cyanobacteria or cyanobacterial toxins may experience gastroenteritis, skin irritation, allergic 

responses, or liver damage.

 Harmful marine algae, such as those associated with red tides, occur in the ocean and can 

produce toxins that may harm or kill fish and marine animals. Humans who eat shellfish 

containing toxins produced by these algae may experience neurologic symptoms (such as tingling 

fingers or toes) and gastrointestinal symptoms. Breathing air that contains toxins from algae 

associated with red tide may cause susceptible individuals to have asthma attacks.

 Pfiesteria piscicida, a single-celled organism that lives in estuaries, has been found near large 

quantities of dead fish. Scientists do not yet know whether P. piscicida affects human health. 

However, reports about symptoms such as headache, confusion, skin rash, and eye irritation in

humans exposed to water containing high concentrations of P. piscicida have prompted public 

concern. 

For more information about HABs, go to the Links page.
# Subpart 5501.1 - PURPOSE, AUTHORITY, ISSUANCE

**Parent topic:**Part 5501 - THE FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION SYSTEM

## 5501.101 Purpose.

The United States Transportation Command Acquisition Regulation Supplement (TRANSFARS) provides command acquisition policies and procedures and supplements the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), and DOD FAR Supplement (DFARS).

## 5501.103 Authority.

The TRANSFARS applies to all USTRANSCOM contracting officers that receive contracting authority from USTRANSCOM, Director of Acquisition (TCAQ).
**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

 

Audit Committee, Board of Directors and Stockholders

Osage Bancshares, Inc.

Pawhuska, Oklahoma

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference into the registration statements of Osage Bancshares, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-140308, 333-140307 and 333-149136) of our report dated September 24, 2008 on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Osage Bancshares, Inc. as of June 30, 2008 and 2007, and for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2008, which report is being            incorporated by reference into the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Osage Bancshares, Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2008.

**/s/BKD, LLP**

 

Joplin, Missouri

September 26 2008
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-02-00765-CR

Michael Andrew Lankes, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 403RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 2021573, HONORABLE FRANK W. BRYAN, JR., JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant=s motion to dismiss this appeal is granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). The 

appeal is dismissed.

__________________________________________

W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Puryear

Dismissed on Appellant=s Motion

Filed: February 21, 2003

Do Not Publish
#  Presidential Determination on Sudan

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State [and the] President of the Export-Import Bank of the United States 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 908(a)(3) of the Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act of 2000, title IX, Public Law 106-387, as amended, 22 U.S.C. 7207(a)(3) (TSRA), I hereby determine it is in the national security interest of the United States to waive the application of section 908(a)(1) of TSRA to allow export assistance to be made available for the export of computers and related equipment that enables the United Nations to facilitate the referendum in Southern Sudan pursuant to the Comprehensive Peace Agreement.

                    The Secretary of State is hereby authorized and directed to publish this determination in the                     *Federal Register*.                

[FR Doc. 2010-30831

Billing code 4710-10-P
May 29, 2015 

Mr. Ray Renteria 

UAV Aeronautics Investigation & Logistics 

6225 W 1st Avenue 

Lakewood, CO 80226 

Dear Mr. Renteria.: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your April 28, 2015, exemption request on behalf into the public docket 

(No. FAA-2015-1252), but we are unable to process your request any further. The 

information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For 

us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
Exhibit 31.1

I, Robert G. Watts, Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of the Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the Bank as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The Companys other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have;

a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Company is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b. evaluated
the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the Evaluation Date); and

c. presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The Companys other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);

a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Companys ability to
record, process, summarize, and report financial data, and I have identified for the Companys auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys
internal controls; and

6. The Companys other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses.



|                    |  |  |  |                                                           
|------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  | 
|Date: June 13, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Robert G. Watts, Jr.                                  
|                    |  |  |  | Robert G. Watts, Jr. President and Chief Financial
Officer