alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|T H E   W H I T E   H O U S E

Bulletin No. 99-07, Supplement 6

Help

Text Only | T H E   W H I T E   H O U S E    | Bulletin No. 99-07, Supplement 6 | Help

Text Only
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------- | -------------------------------- | ---------------
|T H E   W H I T E   H O U S E                                                    | Bulletin No. 99-07, Supplement 6 | Help

Text Only                 

|
|

|November 23, 1999

BULLETIN NO. 99-07, Supplement No. 6

TO THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND ESTABLISHMENTS

SUBJECT:  Apportionment Under the Extension of the Continuing Resolution for Fiscal
Year 2000

1. **Purpose and background**.  H. J. Res. 80 extends the continuing
resolution through December 2, 1999.

2. **Apportionment**.  I am extending the automatic apportionment
specified in section 2 of OMB Bulletin No. 99-07 to December 2, 1999.  The portion of the year
covered is now 17.2 percent.

If you can justify amounts greater than the amount automatically apportioned, please submit
a
written request for apportionment.

Jacob J. LewDirectorThe Budget
 | 
Legislative Information
 | 
Management Reform/GPRA
 | 
Grants Management
Financial Management
 | 
Procurement
        Policy
 | 
Information &
        Regulatory Policy

Privacy Statement
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### § 900.30 Deadline for issuance of Secretary's (final) decisions.

A Secretary's (final) decision under § 900.13a to a proposed amendment on marketing agreement or order shall be issued not later than 60 days after the deadline for submission of exceptions to the recommended decision.
#### § 948.55 Term of office.

The term of office of each area committee member and alternate shall be for two years. The term of office for Colorado Potato Committee members and alternates shall be for one year. The dates on which terms of office for each committee shall begin and end shall be established by the Secretary pursuant to respective committee recommendation. Terms of office of area committee members shall be arranged so that approximately one-half shall terminate each year. Determination of which initial members and alternates shall serve for one year or two years shall be by lot.
###### Editorial Note on Part 91

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 91 appear at 61 FR 51350, Oct. 2 1996.

#### § 91.3 Authority.

The Deputy Administrator is charged with the administration of this subchapter.

[58 FR 42415, Aug. 9, 1993, as amended at 65 FR 64309, Oct. 26, 2000]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3262 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3262

   To suspend temporarily the duty on aluminum lamp-holder housings 
                          containing sockets.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 26, 2006

Mr. Frist (for Mrs. Dole) introduced the following bill; which was read 
             twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on aluminum lamp-holder housings 
                          containing sockets.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN ALUMINUM LAMP-HOLDER HOUSINGS CONTAINING SOCKETS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.85.33        Aluminum lamp-holder    Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           housings containing                                               31/2009          ''
                           sockets (provided for                                                               .
                           in subheading
                           8536.61.00)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 614.17 Judicial review.

A participant must receive a final determination from NAD pursuant to 7 CFR part 11 prior to seeking judicial review in any U.S. District Court of competent jurisdiction.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3203 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3203

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1-propene, 1,1,2,3,3,3-hexafluoror-, 
               oxidized, polymerized, reduced hydrolyzed.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

Mr. Lautenberg introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on 1-propene, 1,1,2,3,3,3-hexafluoror-, 
               oxidized, polymerized, reduced hydrolyzed.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1-PROPENE, 1,1,2,3,3,3-HEXAFLUOROR-, OXIDIZED, POLYMERIZED, 
              REDUCED HYDROLYZED.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.39.22        1-propene, 1,1,2,3,3,3- Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           hexafluoror-,                                                     31/2009          ''
                           oxidized,                                                                           .
                           polymerized, reduced
                           hydrolyzed (CAS No.
                           161075-14-5)
                           (provided for in
                           subheading
                           3907.20.00)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 1-3 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 1 of 33
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 1-3 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 2 of 33
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 1-3 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 3 of 33
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 1-3 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 4 of 33
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 1-3 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 5 of 33
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 1-3 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 6 of 33
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 1-3 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 7 of 33
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 1-3 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 8 of 33
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 1-3 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 9 of 33
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 1-3 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 10 of 33
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 1-3 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 11 of 33
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 1-3 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 12 of 33
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 1-3 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 13 of 33
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 1-3 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 14 of 33
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 1-3 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 15 of 33
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 1-3 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 16 of 33
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 1-3 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 17 of 33
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 1-3 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 18 of 33
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 1-3 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 19 of 33
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 1-3 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 20 of 33
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 1-3 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 21 of 33
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 1-3 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 22 of 33
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 1-3 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 23 of 33
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 1-3 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 24 of 33
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 1-3 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 25 of 33
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 1-3 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 26 of 33
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 1-3 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 27 of 33
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 1-3 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 28 of 33
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 1-3 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 29 of 33
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 1-3 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 30 of 33
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 1-3 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 31 of 33
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 1-3 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 32 of 33
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 1-3 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 33 of 33
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Viking Minerals Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles Irizarry,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of
October 5, 2010.


/s/ Charles Irizarry
--------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
5101.9101 Authority and responsibilities.

(a) Procedures governing grants, cooperative agreements, and technology investment agreements

are set forth in the DoD Grant and Agreement Regulations (DoDGAR), currently codified at Chapter

I, Subchapter C of Title 32, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and Chapter XI of Title 2, CFR (see

Department of Defense Directive Number 3210.06). In the absence of an Army supplement to the

DoDGAR this AFARS subpart provides a record of the Army’s implementation of 32 CFR 21.425 –

21.435.

(b) Procedures governing Other Transaction Authority are set forth at 10 U.S.C. section 2371b and

in the Other Transactions Guide for Prototype Projects, issued January 2017 by the Director for

Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy (DPAP). In the absence of an Army supplement this

subpart provides a record of the Army’s implementation of 10 U.S.C section 2371b and the DPAP

guide.

(b)(1) Heads of contracting activities (HCAs) with grant and cooperative agreement responsibilities

are authorized to make and administer grant and cooperative agreement awards in accordance with

specific delegations of authority from the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and

Technology) (ASA(ALT)) and as otherwise authorized in 32 CFR 21.420(c).

(2) HCAs with other transaction responsibilities are authorized to make and administer other

transaction agreement awards in accordance with specific delegations of authority from the

ASA(ALT) and as otherwise authorized in 10 U.S.C. section 2371b.

(c) HCAs also are authorized to appoint grants officers and agreements officers and to broadly

manage their contracting activity’s functions related to assistance instruments.

(d) HCAs are responsible for grant and cooperative agreement awards made by their contracting

activity and shall supervise and establish and maintain internal policies and procedures for that

activity’s awards.

(e) HCAs shall utilize the Virtual Contracting Enterprise (VCE) Warrant Tool to appoint, suspend,

terminate and otherwise document and maintain a complete file for each grants and agreements

officer. The file will include documentation of qualifications and the continuation of professional

proficiency. The appointing official will update the files in the VCE Warrant Tool upon any change in

the grants and agreements officer’s authority, and will review the files no less than biennially to

ensure compliance with statutes and regulations.

The HCA shall follow the policy set forth in the Contracting Officer Warranting Program Guide. The

policy is available in the Warranting tile on https://procurement.army.mil (PAM) at

https://spcs3.kc.army.mil/asaalt/procurement/warrant/Home.aspx.

Parent topic: Subpart 5101.91 - Authority to Award and Administer Grants, Cooperative

Agreements, Technology Investment Agreements, and Other Transactions
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

 _______________________________

CAREY EDWARD WINFIELD, #180 239 *

Plaintiffs, *

 v. * 2:06-CV-662-MEF

 (WO)

CAPT. SYLVESTER NETTLES, et al., *

Defendants. *

 _______________________________

RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On September 7, 2006 the court entered an order granting Plaintiff fifteen days to file

an amendment to his complaint. (Doc. No. 10.) Plaintiff was cautioned that his failure to

comply with the September 7 order would result in a Recommendation that his complaint

be dismissed. (Id.) The requisite time has passed and Plaintiff has not complied with the

order of the court. Consequently, the court concludes that dismissal of this case is

appropriate for Plaintiff’s failures to prosecute this action and comply with the orders of the

court.

Accordingly, it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that this case

be DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failures to prosecute this action and comply

with the orders of this court.

Case 2:06-cv-00662-MEF-CSC Document 11 Filed 10/10/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

It is further

ORDERED that the parties are DIRECTED to file any objections to the said

Recommendation on or before October 23, 2006. Any objections filed must specifically

identify the findings in the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation to which a party is objecting.

Frivolous, conclusive or general objections will not be considered by the District Court. The

parties are advised that this Recommendation is not a final order of the court and, therefore,

it is not appealable.

Failure to file written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations in the

Magistrate Judge's report shall bar the party from a de novo determination by the District

Court of issues covered in the report and shall bar the party from attacking on appeal factual

findings in the report accepted or adopted by the District Court except upon grounds of plain

error or manifest injustice. Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404 (5 Cir. 1982). See Stein th

v. Reynolds Securities, Inc., 667 F.2d 33 (11 Cir. 1982). See also Bonner v. City of th

Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206 (11 Cir. 1981) (en banc), adopting as binding precedent all of the th

decisions of the former Fifth Circuit handed down prior to the close of business on

September 30, 1981.

Done this 10th day of October, 2006.

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00662-MEF-CSC Document 11 Filed 10/10/2006 Page 2 of 2
# L_2014309EN.01003401.xml

| 30.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 309/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 309/34

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 28 October 2014

appointing a Danish member and a Danish alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

(2014/747/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Danish Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015. On 8 July 2014, by Council Decision 2014/445/EU (3), Mr Marc PERERA CHRISTENSEN was appointed as alternate member until 25 January 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015. On 8 July 2014, by Council Decision 2014/445/EU (3), Mr Marc PERERA CHRISTENSEN was appointed as alternate member until 25 January 2015.

| (2) | A member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Søren PAPE POULSEN. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Søren PAPE POULSEN.

| (3) | An alternate member's seat will become vacant following the appointment of Mr Marc PERERA CHRISTENSEN as member of the Committee of the Regions. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

An alternate member's seat will become vacant following the appointment of Mr Marc PERERA CHRISTENSEN as member of the Committee of the Regions.

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2015:

| (a) | as member:






  — | Mr Marc PERERA CHRISTENSEN, Anden Viceborgmester, Aarhus City Council |
| --- | --- | --- |

(a)

as member:

—

Mr Marc PERERA CHRISTENSEN, Anden Viceborgmester, Aarhus City Council

and

| (b) | as alternate member:






  — | Mr Martin HULGAARD, Viceborgmester, Municipality of Struer. |
| --- | --- | --- |

(b)

as alternate member:

—

Mr Martin HULGAARD, Viceborgmester, Municipality of Struer.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 28 October 2014.

For the Council

The President

G. L. GALLETTI

---

(1)  
  OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22

1

(2)  
  OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 201, 10.7.2014, p. 25.

3

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

FABRICE SNOWDEN,

Petitioner,

v. 

MERRICK GARLAND, et al.,

Defendants. 

Case No. 22-cv-947 (CRC)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Petitioner Fabrice Snowden, who is incarcerated at a federal prison in New Jersey, filed

this pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. See Pet. at 1. 

Snowden challenges his 2007 conviction and 360-month sentence imposed following a guilty plea

in the District of Maryland to one count of sexually exploiting a minor for the purpose of 

producing child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a). See id. at 6; Judgment at 1–2, 

United States v. Snowden, No. 07-cr-100 (D. Md. Oct. 23, 2007). In his petition, Snowden claims, 

among other things, that the statute he was convicted under cannot be constitutionally applied to 

him, that federal prosecutors did not have authority to pursue the charges against him, and that he 

was denied due process of law. See Pet. at 8. As explained below, the Court will dismiss the 

petition for lack of jurisdiction.

District courts may only grant habeas relief “within their respective jurisdictions.” 28 

U.S.C. § 2241(a). “Because ‘[a] writ of habeas corpus does not act upon the prisoner who seeks 

relief, but upon the person who holds him in . . . custody,’ a court may issue the writ only if it has 

jurisdiction over that person.” Stokes v. U.S. Parole Comm’n, 374 F.3d 1235, 1237–38 (D.C. Cir. 

2004) (quoting Braden v. 30th Judicial Cir. Ct. of Ky., 410 U.S. 484, 494 (1973)); see also

Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 442 (2004). Here, the only proper respondent to Snowden’s 
2

§ 2241 action is his immediate custodian—the warden at the Federal Correctional Institution where 

he is being held. See Pet. at 1 (naming wardens “Carroll” and “Harris” as respondents). Snowden 

is currently incarcerated at FCI Fairton, in Fairton, New Jersey, so he must bring any claim for 

relief under § 2241 in the District of New Jersey—not in this Court. See Inmate Locator, Federal

Bureau of Prisons, https://www.bop.gov/inmateloc/ (search for Fabrice Robert Snowden as of June 

6, 2022).

Because the Court does not have jurisdiction over Snowden’s petition, it will dismiss this 

matter without prejudice. A separate Order shall accompany this memorandum opinion.

CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER

United States District Judge

Date: June 6, 2022
Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 10 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 1 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 10 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 2 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 10 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 3 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 10 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 4 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 10 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 5 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 10 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 6 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 10 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 7 of 7