alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

RALPH WILSON LINGO, )

)

 Petitioner, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06-CV-703-MHT

)

WILLIE R. COLLINS, et al., )

)

 Respondents. )

ORDER ON MOTION

Upon consideration of the motion for leave to amend filed by the petitioner on

September 28, 2006 (Court Doc. No. 12), and for good cause, it is

ORDERED that this motion be and is hereby GRANTED. It is further 

ORDERED that on or before October 17, 2006 the petitioner mayfile an amendment

to his petition for habeas corpus relief. The petitioner is cautioned that if he fails to file

an amendment in compliance with this order this case will proceed only on those claims

presented in the original petition. 

Done this 2nd day of October, 2006.

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00703-MHT-CSC Document 13 Filed 10/02/2006 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000759440
<NAME> BIG RIVER PRODUCTIONS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          49,878
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                49,878
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,878
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              100
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,778
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,878
<SALES>                                         33,122
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                33,122
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      900
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 32,222
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             32,222
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    32,222
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 956.26 Vacancies.

To fill any vacancy occasioned by the failure of any person nominated as a member or as an alternate to qualify, or in the event of the death, removal, resignation, or disqualification of a member or alternate, a successor for the unexpired term may be selected by the Secretary from nominations made pursuant to § 956.22 from previously unselected nominees on the current nominee list, or from other eligible persons.
EX-35 (g)
PHH Mortgage
(logo) PHH
4001 Leadenhall Road
Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054




March 7, 2007

WELLS FARGO BANK
Servicer Oversight Group, Yvonne Williams
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045


Re:  Servicer Compliance Statement

Deal Name: GSAA 2006-16

Dear Sir and/or Madame:

This statement of compliance is being provided in accordance with Item 1123 of
Regulation AB. The Undersigned hereby states that:

1.   I am an authorized officer of PHH Mortgage Corporation (the "Servicer");

2.   A review of the Servicer's activities during the period from 09/28/2006
     (the "Reporting Period") and its performance under the Agreement has been
     made under my supervision; and

3.   To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, except as described in
     section 3(a) hereto, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations
     under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting
     Period.

     a.   The Servicer did not maintain or provide one of the required monthly
          reports, specifically the S5L2 Fidelity report, as stated in the
          transaction agreement(s) for the Reporting period shown in section 2
          of this statement.


By: /s/ Deborah A. Rocchi
Name:  Deborah A. Rocchi
Title: Assistant Vice President
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

LAKITA JORDAN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2:06-cv-712-MEF

)

HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

This cause is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Enlargement of Time (Doc.

# 4). Upon consideration, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED.

DONE this the 1 day of September, 2006. st

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00712-MEF-CSC Document 5 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 238 (Monday, December 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 77664]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31137]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-72,493]


Ananke, Inc., Providence, RI; Notice of Affirmative Determination 
Regarding Application for Reconsideration

    By application dated October 25, 2010, a worker requested 
administrative reconsideration of the negative determination regarding 
workers' eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) 
applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The 
determination was issued on October 6, 2010, and the Notice of 
Determination was published in the Federal Register on October 25, 2010 
(75 FR 65520-21).
    The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination 
based on the findings that neither the subject firm nor a client firm 
shifted to/acquired from a foreign country the supply of services like 
or directly competitive with the services supplied by the workers, that 
the subject firm did not import like or directly competitive services 
during the relevant period, and that the subject workers are not 
adversely affected secondary workers.
    The request for reconsideration states that ``Ananke Inc. performed 
application packaging services for John Hancock * * * In September 
2009, John Hancock replaced * * * Ananke Inc. with * * * Cognizant 
Technology Solutions (an offshoring/outsourcing company)'' and included 
support documentation.
    The Department of Labor has carefully reviewed the request for 
reconsideration and the existing record, and has determined that the 
Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the 
workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
amended.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim 
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. 
Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, 
granted.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 1st day of December, 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-31137 Filed 12-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3424 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3424

  To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on 3-(Ethylsulfonyl)-2-
                          pyridinesulfonamide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 6, 2006

  Mr. Durbin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on 3-(Ethylsulfonyl)-2-
                          pyridinesulfonamide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 3-(ETHYLSULFONYL)-2-PYRIDINESULFONAMIDE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.33.63 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 3-(Ethylsulfonly)-2-
pyridinesulfonamide) is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS
EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

LEONARDO CARO TERRAZAS, ASELMO PARRA CASTILLO, ANTIONIO BOJORQUEZ ROSAS,
CARLOS ARTURO CEVANTES HERNANDEZ, CESAR QUINTANA MARTINEZ, BERNARDO CARO MONGES, GANADERA SANTA SOFIA, HECTOR HUGO VARGAS VASQUEZ,
INTERGANADERA FAMFLO S.P.R. de
R.L. de C.V

. , JESUS IGNACIO ARMENDARIZ TORRES, JESUS
MENDOZA ROMER O , JESUS MANUEL PARRA CHAVEZ, JOSE G. VILLALOBOS VILLALOBOS,
MANUEL ARMANDO GONZALEZ CARMONA, NICOLAS CAROTERRAZAS, OSCAR TE NA LOCANO, OSCAR CHACON HERRERA, RAFAEL RUIZ HERNANDEZ, RA N CHO LOS
TATOLEROS S.P.R. de R.L. de C.V.

, ROGELIO CAMACHO ARMENDARIZ,
SO CORRO MONTES VARGAS, RANCHO BLANCO DE CHAVEZ,
AGRICOLA Y GANDERA ZAZUETA S.A. de C.V., CANDELARIO MOL I NA RETANA, CARLOS DUART E VILLA, GELACIO LECHUGA VALDEZ, JOSE MIGUEL NEVAREZ, JUAN MANUEL MENDOZA, JESUS PESQIERA GASELUM, EUGENIO RIVERA TENA,
AGRICOLA GANADERA LOS MOLINAS, ADAN HERNANDEZ DIAZ, ALEJANDRO PORRAS DUARTE, §

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 9

- 00206

- CV

Appeal from the

327th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2016DCV4635 )2

ANDREA VALLES VACA,
CANDELARIO MOLI N A RETANA,
CAR L OS DUARTE VILLA, CORNELIO RIVERA RIVAS, ERNESTO MERAZ OLIVAS, FRUTI GANA

- DERA de RL de CV, GANADERA DOBLE O, GERARDO GARCIA ANAYA,
GUILLERMO OLIVAS RODRIGUEZ DE LOS DOS, JOSE ANTONIO MERAZ OLIVAS, JOSE MARTA MERAZ HERNANDEZ, JUAN JOSE GARCIA VALDEZ, LEONARDO CARO
T ERRAZAS, LUIS ARMANDO ESTRADA CASTELLANOS, ROGELIO CAMACHO, SERGIO SOLIS CHAVEZ,
and SERGIO VILLALOBOS

,

Appellant s ,

v.

SIMON CHAVEZ a/k/a SIMON CHAVEZ DE PABLO, individually and d/b/a 24 TRADING CO., ALVARO BUSTILLOS, and VAQUERO TRADING, L.L.C.

,

Appellees. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

MEMORAND U M OPINION

On July 31, 2019, Appellants filed a late notice of appeal in this case , but within the 15

-

day grace period provided by T EX .R.A PP .P. 26.3

. We treated the late notice as having been

accompanied by an implied motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal and asked

Appellants to provide an explanation for the filing delay. See Verbu r gt v. Dorner , 959 S.W.2d

615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Appellants subsequently filed a verified motion for extension of time to file

a late notice of appeal, which the Court granted. Appellants have now filed a motion to dismiss

the appeal und er T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.1(a)(1) , stating that they no longer wish to pursue this appeal.3

The motion to dismiss is unopposed.

We grant the Appellants’ motion and dismiss the appeal. Costs of the appeal are taxed

against the Appellants. T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.1(d).

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice September 25, 2019

Before Rodriguez, J., Palafox, J., and Barajas, C.J. (Senio r Judge) Barajas, C.J. (Senior Judge), sitting by assignment
Subpart 447.3 - Transportation in Supply Contracts    **Parent topic:** PART 447 - TRANSPORTATION447.302 Place of delivery - F.O.B. point.       The contracting officer shall insert a clause substantially the same as the clause at 452.247-70, Delivery Location, in supply contracts when it is necessary to specify delivery locations. If appropriate, the clause may reference an attachment which lists various delivery locations and other delivery details (e.g., quantities to be delivered to each location, etc.).447.305 Solicitation provisions, contract clauses, and transportation factors.447.305-10 Packing, marking, and consignment instructions.       (a) The contracting officer shall insert a clause substantially the same as the clause at 452.247-71, Marking Deliverables, in solicitations and contracts if special marking on deliverables (other than reports) are required.          (b) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 452.247-72, Packing for Domestic Shipment, in contracts when item(s) will be delivered for immediate use to a destination in the continental United States; when the material specification or purchase description does not provide preservation, packaging, packing, and/or marking requirements; and/or when the requiring activity has not cited a specific specification for packaging.          (c) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 452.247-73, Packing for Overseas Shipment, in contracts when item(s) will be delivered to an overseas destination for immediate use, the material specification does not specify packing levels, and the required activity has not specified such requirements.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 23-10718

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

In re: SHIRLEY WHITE-LETT, 

Debtor.

___________________________________________________

SHIRLEY WHITE-LETT, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, 

a.k.a. Fannie Mae,

MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM, 

INCORPORATED, 

(MERS),

USCA11 Case: 23-10718 Document: 44-1 Date Filed: 06/26/2023 Page: 1 of 3
2 Opinion of the Court 23-10718

MERSCORP HOLDINGS, INC., 

d.b.a. MERS,

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,

Defendants-Appellees,

NEWREZ, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

D.C. Docket No. 4:22-cv-00082-WMR,

Bkcy No. 1:10-bk-61451-BEM

____________________

Before JORDAN, NEWSOM, and BRANCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The motions to dismiss the appeal filed by Bank of America, 

N.A.; MERSCOPR Holdings, Inc.; Mortgage Electronics Registration Systems, Inc.; and Federal National Mortgage Association are 

GRANTED, and this appeal is DISMISSED.

Although the district court’s February 17, 2023, order resolved the claims against some of the defendants, it did not end the 

USCA11 Case: 23-10718 Document: 44-1 Date Filed: 06/26/2023 Page: 2 of 3
23-10718 Opinion of the Court 3

litigation on the merits because the matters in the district court remain pending as to the Bank of New York Mellon; the Bank of New 

York Mellon, Corporation; RRA CP Opportunity Trust 1; Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing; and NewRez, LLC. Thus, because the 

district court did not certify the order under Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 54(b), it is not final or otherwise immediately appealable. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291, 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Supreme Fuels 

Trading FZE v. Sargeant, 689 F.3d 1244, 1246 (11th Cir. 2012) (explaining that an order adjudicating fewer than all the claims in a 

suit, or adjudicating the rights and liabilities of fewer than all the 

parties, is not a final judgment from which an appeal may be taken, 

unless the district court properly certifies a judgment on fewer than 

all claims or parties as “final” under Rule 54(b)); CSX Transp., Inc. v. 

City of Garden City, 235 F.3d 1325, 1327 (11th Cir. 2000) (“A final 

decision is one which ends the litigation on the merits and leaves 

nothing for the court to do but execute the judgment.”). Additionally, the February 17, 2023, order is not appealable pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1) because no party sought injunctive relief in the 

district court, and the order did not grant or deny such relief. See

28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1).

All pending motions other than the motions to dismiss are 

DENIED as moot.

USCA11 Case: 23-10718 Document: 44-1 Date Filed: 06/26/2023 Page: 3 of 3
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.4.1 


SCHEDULE OF EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS 
In accordance with Instruction 2 to Item 601 of Regulation S-K, Fulton Financial Corporation (the “Corporation”) has omitted filing Executive Employment Agreements by and between the Corporation and the following Executive Officers because they are substantially identical in all material respects to the form of Executive Employment Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Corporations Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 4, 2018: 
	
			
	1.
	 
	Mark R. McCollom

	2.
	 
	Curtis J. Myers

	3.
	 
	David M. Campbell

	4.
	 
	Beth Ann L. Chivinski

	5.
	 
	Meg R. Mueller

	6.
	 
	Angela M. Sargent

	7.
	 
	Angela M. Snyder

	8.
	 
	Daniel R. Stolzer

	9.
	 
	Bernadette M. Taylor
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Avago Technologies Finance Pte. Ltd. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended November 1, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned,
Douglas R. Bettinger, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|    |  |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|    | 
|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                                              |  | 
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Date: December 15, 2009 |  | /s/ Douglas R. Bettinger                     |  | 
|                        |  | Douglas R. Bettinger Chief
Financial Officer |  | 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
# Subpart 5215.2 - SOLICITATION AND RECEIPT OF PROPOSALS AND INFORMATION

**Parent topic:**Part 5215 - CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION

## 5215.204 Contract format.

### 5215.204-5 Part IV--Representations and Instructions.

(c) When a cost realism analysis is to be performed, Section M, Evaluation Factors for Award, should include a notice that the proposed costs may be adjusted, for purposes of proposal evaluation, based upon the results of the cost realism analysis.
No. 89-6588.

#### Motton *v.*Mann’s Wrecker Service.

Sup. Ct. Tenn. Certiorari denied.
52.229-7 Taxes-Fixed-Price Contracts with

Foreign Governments.

As prescribed in 29.402-1(b), insert the following clause:

Taxes-Fixed-Price Contracts with Foreign Governments (Feb 2013)

(a) "Contract date," as used in this clause, means the date set for bid opening or, if this is a

negotiated contract or a modification, the effective date of this contract or modification.

(b)

(1) The contract price, including the prices in any subcontracts under this contract, does not include

any tax or duty that the Government of the United States and the Government of ______ [insert name

of the foreign government] have agreed shall not apply to expenditures made by the United States in

______ [insert name of country], or any tax or duty not applicable to this contract or any subcontracts

under this contract, pursuant to the laws of ______ [insert name of country]. If any such tax or duty

has been included in the contract price, through error or otherwise, the contract price shall be

correspondingly reduced.

(2) Taxes imposed under 26 U.S.C. 5000 C may not be included in the contract price.

(c) If, after the contract date, the Government of the United States and the Government of ______

[insert name of the foreign government] agree that any tax or duty included in the contract price

shall not apply to expenditures by the United States in ________ [insert name of country], the contract

price shall be reduced accordingly.

(d) No adjustment shall be made in the contract price under this clause unless the amount of the

adjustment exceeds $250.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.229 [Reserved]
424.203 Policy.

USDA regulations implementing the Freedom of Information Act are found in 7 CFR, Subtitle A, Part

1, Subpart A. Contracting officers shall follow these regulations when responding to requests for

information.

Parent topic: Subpart 424.2 - Freedom of Information Act
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          29,103
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,692
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    174,875
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               231,670
<PP&E>                                          97,573
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,954
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 354,214
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          350,624
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   605,898
<SALES>                                         73,193
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                73,193
<CGS>                                           53,138
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  127,556
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (543,637)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (543,637)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
#### § 920.2 Act.

*Act* means Public Act No. 10, 73d Congress (May 12, 1933), as amended and as reenacted and amended by the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (48 Stat. 31, as amended; 7 U.S.C. 601 *et seq.*).