alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31**

**WAMU ASSET ACCEPTANCE CORP.**

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

I, Thomas G. Lehmann, certify that:

1.         I have reviewed this report on Form 10–K and all reports on Form 10–D required to be filed in respect of theperiod covered by this report on Form 10–K of Washington Mutual Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, WMALT Series 2006-9 Trust (the ‘‘Exchange Act periodic reports’’);

2.         Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement ofa  material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.         Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form10–D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.         Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB,and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material respects; and

5.         All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their relatedattestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a–18 and 15d–18 have been included as anexhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10–K. 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: None.

Date:  March 15, 2007

  /s/ Thomas G. LehmannName:  Thomas G. LehmannTitle:    President
#### § 959.55 Notification of regulation.

The Secretary shall promptly notify the committee of regulations issued or of any modification, suspension, or termination thereof. The committee shall give reasonable notice thereof to handlers.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3277 

To suspend temporarily the duty on wide-range high sensitivity color zoom 

digital security camera. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 26, 2006 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on wide-range high 

sensitivity color zoom digital security camera. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. WIDE-RANGE HIGH SENSITIVITY COLOR ZOOM 

4 DIGITAL SECURITY CAMERA. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 3277 IS 

‘‘ 9902.85.25 Wide-range high sensitivity high resolution color zoom digital security camera 

module with 360 viewing radius, progressive recording direct to HDD and custom 

designed digital signal processor (DSP) 

chip for automatic focus functions; 

380,000 to 470,000 pixels image sensor, 

optical lens zoom power 35x magnification (provided for in subheading 

8525.30.90) ............................................. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

 ______________________________

HOWARD GLENN TOOLE, *

#C 917683

Petitioner, *

 v. * 2:06-CV-714-MHT

 

JAMES MCDONOUGH, et al., * 

Respondents. *

 ______________________________

ORDER

In his response filed December 4, 2006 to the order of this court requiring that he

establish cause and prejudice with respect to the claims in his petition considered

procedurally defaulted, Petitioner asserts that any default arising from the failure to present

his defaulted claims in accordance with the state’s procedural rules was due to the ineffective

assistance of counsel and his inability to access relevant legal material. (Doc. No. 15.) The

court therefore construes Petitioner’s response as a motion to amend. Upon consideration

of the motion to amend, and for good cause, it is

ORDERED that this motion (Doc. No. 15) be and is hereby GRANTED. 

It is further 

ORDERED that on or before December 27, 2006 Respondents shall file a

supplemental answer addressing Petitioner's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel and

access to courts and his assertions that counsel’s ineffectiveness and his inability to access

relevant legal material establishes cause for his procedural default. Respondents’ answer

should comport with the directives contained in the court’s September 15, 2006 order of

Case 2:06-cv-00714-MHT-WC Document 16 Filed 12/07/2006 Page 1 of 2
procedure. (See Doc. No. 7.) 

Done, this 7th day of December 2006.

 /s/Wallace Capel, Jr. 

WALLACE CAPEL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00714-MHT-WC Document 16 Filed 12/07/2006 Page 2 of 2
232.7003 Procedures.

(a) DoD officials receiving payment requests in electronic form shall process the payment requests in

electronic form. The WAWF system provides the method to electronically process payment requests

and receiving reports.

(1) Documents necessary for payment, such as receiving reports, invoice approvals, contracts,

contract modifications, and required certifications, shall also be processed in electronic form.

(2) Scanned documents and other commonly used file formats are only acceptable for processing

supporting documentation.

(b) If one of the exceptions to submission in electronic form at 232.7002 (a) applies, the contracting

officer shall—

(1) Consult the payment office and the contract administration office regarding the alternative

method to be used for submission of payment requests or receiving reports (e.g., facsimile or

conventional mail); and

(2) Provide procedures for invoicing in the contract administration data section of the contract or

task or delivery order (e.g., section G, an addendum to FAR 52.212-4, or applicable clause) for

submission of invoices by nonelectronic means. If submission of invoices by nonelectronic means is

temporary, the procedures should specify the time period for which they apply.

Parent topic: Subpart 232.70 - ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION AND PROCESSING OF PAYMENT

REQUESTS AND RECEIVING REPORTS
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 300 

To extend the temporary increase in payments under the medicare program 

for home health services furnished in a rural area. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2005 

Ms. COLLINS (for herself, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mr. LUGAR, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. 

BURNS, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mr. BOND, Mr. THOMAS, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. 

SANTORUM, Mrs. LINCOLN, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr. CONRAD, and Mr. 

LEAHY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary increase in payments under the 

medicare program for home health services furnished 

in a rural area. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Rural Home 

5 Health Payment Fairness Act of 2005’’. 
2 

•S 300 IS

1 SEC. 2. TWO-YEAR EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY MEDICARE 

2 PAYMENT INCREASE FOR HOME HEALTH 

3 SERVICES FURNISHED IN A RURAL AREA. 

4 Section 421 of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Im5 provement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (42 U.S.C. 

6 1395fff note) is amended— 

7 (1) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘ONE8 YEAR’’ and inserting ‘‘TEMPORARY’’; and 

9 (2) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘2005’’ and 

10 inserting ‘‘2007’’. 

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6593

CHESTER WILSON JONES, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

SIDNEY HARKLEROAD,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,

District Judge. (5:05-hc-00762-BO)

Submitted: November 16, 2007 Decided: November 30, 2007

Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Chester Wilson Jones, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Mary Carla Hollis,

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Chester Wilson Jones, Jr., seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or

judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court

is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. See Miller-El v.

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S.

473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jones

has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Jones’

motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Affirmed as Reformed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 10 , 201 2

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 12

- 00 072

- CR

____________
TERRY DON BOOKER , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 252nd District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 10

- 08471



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant entered a “ guilty ” plea to criminal solicitation. In accordance with the terms of a plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court deferred adjudicati on of guilt, placed appellant under community supervision for five years, and assessed a fine of $500. Subsequently , the State moved to adjudicate guilt . Appellant entered a plea of

“ true ” to one allegation. The trial court found the allegation true, adjudicated guilt, and sentenced appellant to confinement for eleven years in the Institutional Division of the

Texas Department of Criminal Justice.2

In three issues, appellant claims the trial court erred in assessing a $500 fine against appellant in the judgment adjudicating guilt because there was no oral pronouncement of
the fine. The State concedes the fine was incl uded in the administrative

- fee calculation and that no fine was orally pronounced. Appellant's issues are sustained.
Because the oral pronouncement controls, the fine must be deleted from the judgment. See Taylor v. State
, 131 S.W.3d 497, 502 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). Accordingly, w e reform the judgment of the trial court to reflect administrative fees are

assesse d in the amount of $2,906.00. As reformed, t he judgment of the trial court is
affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Ju stice s Frost, Seymore, and McCally

. Do not publish

- T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3360 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3360

  To suspend temporarily the duty on phenyl salicylate (benzoic acid,
                       2-hydroxy-, phenyl ester).

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 5, 2006

   Mr. Frist introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on phenyl salicylate (benzoic acid, 2-
                        hydroxy-, phenyl ester).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PHENYL SALICYLATE (BENZOIC ACID, 2-HYDROXY-, PHENYL ESTER).

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.29.11        Phenyl salicylate       Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           (benzoic acid, 2-                                                 31/2009          ''
                           hydroxy-, phenyl                                                                    .
                           ester) CAS No. 118-55-
                           8) (provided for in
                           subheading
                           2918.23.10)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
PART 51 –– USE OF GOVERNMENT SOURCES

BY CONTRACTORS
#### The Northampton National Bank, Respondent, v. Lucien H. Niles, Appellant.

(Argued June 18, 1884 ;

decided June 27, 1884.

*Clarence B. Ashley*for appellant.

*W. G. Peck,ham,*for respondent.

Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion.

All concur.

Appeal dismissed.
#### § 917.13 Pack.

*Pack* means the specific arrangement, size, weight, count, or grade of a quantity of fruit in a particular type and size of container or any combination thereof.

###### Effective Date Note

#### Effective Date Note:

At 76 FR 66605, Oct. 27, 2011, § 917.13 was suspended indefinitely, effective Oct. 28, 2011.
PART 42 –– CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION

AND AUDIT SERVICES

 SUBPART 42.15 — CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE INFORMATION

 42.1502 Policy.

 42.1503 Procedures.

SUBPART 42.15 — CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE

INFORMATION

42.1502 Policy.

(a) Documents to assist with Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) to

include the DISA CPARS Procedures are located at https://www.ditco.disa.mil/hq/deskbooks.asp.

Current Guidance for CPARS and the User Manual are available at https://www.cpars.gov/help.htm.

42.1503 Procedures.

(a)(1)(i) Past performance assessments are a combined responsibility of the Assessing Official (AO)

Assessing Official Representative (AOR), Reviewing Official (RO), and Contractor Representative

(CR).

(a)(1)(ii) The contracting officer shall be assigned as the AO. The RO is at least a level above the AO.

The contracting officer and Focal Point (PSD Contract Specialist) appoint AORs (Contracting

Officer’s Representative (COR) or Program Office Representatives) to assist the AO with writing the

evaluation. If the AOR is the COR, the AOR designation shall be included in the COR appointment

letter.
Case 2:06-cv-00693-ID-TFM Document 2 Filed 08/07/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00693-ID-TFM Document 2 Filed 08/07/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00693-ID-TFM Document 2 Filed 08/07/2006 Page 3 of 3
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3083 

To suspend temporarily the duty on traveler padded potty seats. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. BROWNBACK introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on traveler padded potty 

seats. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TRAVELER PADDED POTTY SEATS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.39.24 Traveler padded potty seats (provided for 

in subheading 3924.90.55) ...................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


wwhite on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
2 

•S 3083 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwhite on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2939 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Yellow 1189. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 23, 2006 

Mr. CARPER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Yellow 1189. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. YELLOW 1189. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.32.08 Yellow 1189 (provided for in 

subheading 3215.19.00) ...... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•S 2939 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
CERTIFICATIONI, Kokmeng Koh, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-Drequired to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K ofPrincipal Life Income Fundings Trust 2006-68 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and otherinformation required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by thisreport is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required inthis report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the ExchangeAct period reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement(s) in all material respects; and  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be includedin this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A. and Bankers Trust Company, N.A.Date: March 28, 2007   /s/ Kokmeng Koh     Kokmeng Koh  Second Vice President
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

MARVIN NATION, #141669, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) Civil Action No. 2:06cv693-ID

v. ) WO

)

)

WILLIE AMBERS, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

On July 23, 2008, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case (Doc.

No. 41) to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the

file in this case and upon CONSIDERATION of the Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge, said Recommendation is hereby adopted, and it is ORDERED that Defendants’

motion for summary judgment be and the same is hereby GRANTED and that this action is

hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.

A judgment in accordance with this Order shall be entered separately.

Done this 5 day of August, 2008. th

/s/ Ira DeMent 

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00693-ID-TFM Document 43 Filed 08/05/2008 Page 1 of 1
###### Editorial Note on Part 782

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 782 appear at 61 FR 32643, June 25, 1996.

#### § 782.25 Length of time records are to be kept.

The records required to be kept under this part shall be retained for 3 years following the filing date of the applicable record. Records shall be kept for such longer period of time as may be requested in writing by USDA representatives.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3184 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3184

 To extend temporarily the suspension of the duty on 2-Mercaptoethanol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

 Ms. Landrieu introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend temporarily the suspension of the duty on 2-Mercaptoethanol.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-MERCAPTOETHANOL.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.60 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking the date in the 
effective period column and inserting ``December 31, 2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Seymour S. Kane.

Motion for reinstatement granted only to the extent of referring the matter to the Committee on Character and Fitness for Admission to the Bar for a report as indicated in the order of this court. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Fein, Markewich, Silver-man and Carro, JJ.