alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                   5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Partnership's  unaudited  financial  statements  for the quarter ended March 31,
1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 Sep-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                      Mar-31-1999
<CASH>                                  1,015
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        1,015
<PP&E>                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          1,846
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      59
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                              1,787
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            1,846
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          776
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             194
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           60
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         18
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           504
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       504
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                              504
<EPS-BASIC>                           13.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                           13.14


</TABLE>
****CORRECTED COPY

– DESTROY ALL OTHERS****

UNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

UNITED STATES

v.

Airman First Class JAMES N . MOISE

United States Air Force

ACM S32354

26 February 2016

Sentence adjudged 14 October 201 5 by SP CM convened at Joint Base

Lewis

- Mc Chord

, Washington . Military Judge: L yndell M. Powell (sitting

alone).

Approved S entence: Bad

- conduct discharge, confinement for 70 day s

, and

r eduction to E

- 1

.

Appellate Counsel for the Appellant: Captain Annie W. Morgan

.

Appellate Counsel for the United States: Colonel Katherine E. Oler.

Before

MITCHELL

, DUBRISKE , and BROWN

Appellate Military Judges

This opinion is issued as an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as precedent

under Rule of Practice and Procedure 18.4

.



### PER CURIAM:

The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error

materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of A ppellant occurred. 1 

### Article 66(c),

UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c); United States v. Reed , 54 M.J. 37, 41 (C.A.A.F. 2000).

1 We note the staff judge advocate’s recommendation (SJAR) misstated that the maximum forfeitures available in

Appellant ’s case were limited to 6 months, instead of the 12

- month jurisdictional maximum. The SJAR also did not

provide a specific statement as to why the convening authority was not obligated to take any action under the pretrial

agreement. See A ir Force Instruction 51

- 201, Administration of Military Justice , ¶ 9.16.3 (6 June 2013). We find

Appellant suffered no material prejudice from these e rrors. Additionally, Appellant’s counsel noted the name of one

of Appellant’s co

- conspirators in Charge II is misspelled. We direct a corrected promulgating order to remedy this

discrepancy.ACM S32354 2 

### Acc ordingly, the approved findings and sentence are

AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT

LEAH M. CALAHAN

Clerk of the Court
# L_2014175DE.01005401.xml

| 14.6.2014 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 175/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.6.2014

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 175/54

---

Berichtigung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) Nr. 278/2014 der Kommission vom 19. März 2014 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 185/2010 hinsichtlich einer Präzisierung, Harmonisierung und Vereinfachung des Einsatzes von Sprengstoffspurendetektoren

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 82 vom 20. März 2014
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 82 vom 20. März 2014

Auf Seite 5, Anhang Nummer 5 Buchstabe c zur Anfügung von Anhang Kapitel 12 Nummer 12.6.3 der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 185/2010:

anstatt:

| „12.6.3 | Die zuständige Behörde kann den Betrieb von ETD-Geräten ohne Zertifizierung, die vor dem 1. Juli 2014 eingesetzt wurden, nach den Anforderungen der Anlage 12-L zur Probenahme von Partikeln längstens bis 1. Juli 2020 genehmigen.“ |
| --- | --- |

„12.6.3

Die zuständige Behörde kann den Betrieb von ETD-Geräten ohne Zertifizierung, die vor dem 1. Juli 2014 eingesetzt wurden, nach den Anforderungen der Anlage 12-L zur Probenahme von Partikeln längstens bis 1. Juli 2020 genehmigen.“

muss es heißen:

| „12.6.3 | Die zuständige Behörde kann den Betrieb von ETD-Geräten für die Probenahme von Partikeln, die vor dem 1. Juli 2014 eingesetzt wurden und welche nicht nach den Anforderungen der Anlage 12-L zertifiziert sind, längstens bis 1. Juli 2020 genehmigen.“ |
| --- | --- |

„12.6.3

Die zuständige Behörde kann den Betrieb von ETD-Geräten für die Probenahme von Partikeln, die vor dem 1. Juli 2014 eingesetzt wurden und welche nicht nach den Anforderungen der Anlage 12-L zertifiziert sind, längstens bis 1. Juli 2020 genehmigen.“

---
450.303-1 Contractor requests.

Contractor requests shall be submitted to the contracting officer.

Parent topic: Subpart 450.3 - Contract Adjustments
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

LUMBERMAN'S UNDERWRITING )

ALLIANCE, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

v. ) CASE NO. 3:06-cv-645-MEF

)

EMORY LEE YOUNG, )

)

Defendant. )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #17) filed on March

1, 2007, it is hereby ORDERED 

1. That the plaintiff file a response which shall include a brief and any evidentiary

materials on or before March 21, 2007. 

2. The defendant may file a reply brief on or before March 28, 2007.

DONE this the 7th day of March, 2007.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00645-MEF-TFM Document 18 Filed 03/07/2007 Page 1 of 1
Order filed May 1, 2014

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-13-00214-CR

__________

BRITTANY REDDEN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 6

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1204249

O R D E R

This appeal has become unduly stalled due to the failure of Appellant’s 

retained counsel, Wm. Reagan Wynn, to file an appellate brief. The brief was 

originally due on October 14, 2013. This court has granted four motions for 

extension of time to file Appellant’s brief, and counsel has now filed a fifth motion

for extension despite this court’s letter dated April 3, 2014, in which this court 
2

directed counsel to file an appellate brief on or before April 11, 2014, “with no 

further extensions.” As of this date, we have not received Appellant’s brief.

Counsel has ignored this court’s directive.

By this order, Wm. Reagan Wynn is ORDERED to file in this court a brief

on behalf of Appellant on or before 3:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 6, 2014. At that 

time, Appellant’s brief shall have already been e-filed or be present in the portal 

for the Eleventh Court of Appeals through eFileTexas.gov. If Appellant’s brief has 

not been e-filed by 3:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 6, 2014, Wm. Reagan Wynn is 

ORDERED to appear in person at that time in the courtroom of the Eleventh Court 

of Appeals at 100 West Main Street in Eastland, Texas, to explain the inordinate

delay in the preparation of Appellant’s brief. 

PER CURIAM

May 1, 2014

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.
#### § 920.8 Committee.

*Committee* means the Kiwifruit Administrative Committee established pursuant to § 920.20.
###### Editorial Note on Part 57

#### Editorial Note:

1. At 63 FR 69969, Dec. 17, 1998, part 57 was added by duplicating portions of part 59. At 63 FR 72353, Dec. 31, 1998, part 59 was redesignated as part 590 of 9 CFR.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 57 appear at 63 FR 69971, Dec. 17, 1998.

#### § 57.690 Person required to register.

Egg handlers, except for producer-packers with an annual egg production from a flock of 3,000 hens or less, who grade and pack eggs for the ultimate consumer, and hatcheries, are required to register with the Department by furnishing their name, place of business, and such other information requested on the registration form available from the Department. Completed forms shall be sent to the addressee indicated on the form. Persons above who are establishing a business will be required to register before they start operations.

[69 FR 571688, Sept. 24, 2004]
#### In the Matter of Armando Cardona, Appellant, v Harold J. Smith, as Superintendent of the Attica Correctional Facility, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed on the memorandum decision of Special Term, Conable, J. (Appeal from judgment of Wyoming Supreme Court— CPLR art 78.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Cardamone, Schnepp, Doerr and Witmer, JJ.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

JAMES PETTY, #124 252, *

Plaintiff, *

v. * Case No. 2:06-CV-639-WKW

RAY B. FINEDOR, et al, *

Defendants. *

RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

 WHEREAS Defendant Edward Olanda Hardy initially received notice of the

Complaint on September 3, 2006 and replied on September 5, 2006 (copy of the

response attached hereto as “Defendant Hardy Exhibit A”). Defendant Hardy reported

to work with the Troy Police Department on Sunday, October 29, 2006 and discovered

the Order to Show Cause in his in-box at that time. Said Order was mailed to the Troy

Police Department instead of his home address being 106 Ruth Road, Troy, Alabama. 

Defendant Hardy retained the undersigned Clifton F. Hastings on Monday, October 30,

2006.

Defendant Hardy has not failed to comply with the Court’s September 13, 2006

Order as he has yet to receive notice of that Order. Notice of Appearance has now

been filed by Defendant Hardy’s attorney, the undersigned Clifton F. Hastings and we

are in the process of obtaining a copy of the file and replying to all directives of the

Court accordingly. Therefore, we respectfully request the Order to Show Cause be

withdrawn. 

Case 2:06-cv-00639-WKW-TFM Document 19 Filed 11/01/2006 Page 1 of 2
Respectfully submitted this 1st day of November, 2006.

 s/ Clifton F. Hastings 

Clifton F. Hastings (HAS014)

Attorney for Defendant Edward O. Hardy

CERVERA, RALPH & REEVES, LLC

914 South Brundidge Street

P. O. Box 325

Troy, Alabama 36081

(334) 566-0116

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify a copy of the foregoing Notice of Appearance has been

electronically served upon the following on the 1st day of November, 2006 by CM/ECF:

Steven Mallette Sirmon 

Alabama Board of Pardons & Paroles 

301 South Ripley St 

PO Box 302405 

Montgomery, AL 36130 

steven.sirmon@paroles.alabama.gov

 s/ Clifton F. Hastings 

Clifton F. Hastings

Case 2:06-cv-00639-WKW-TFM Document 19 Filed 11/01/2006 Page 2 of 2
se 2:06-cv-00639-WKW-TFM Document 19-2 Filed 11/01/2006 Page 1 o
Exhibit 41141


		
			Exhibit 4.1.14.1
		

		
			SCHEDULE OF SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURES SUBSTANTIALLY IDENTICAL TO FORM OF SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE DURING AND AFTER 2014
		

		
			In accordance with Instruction 2 to Item 601 of Regulation S-K, the Registrant has omitted filing the following Supplemental Indentures by and between Aqua Pennsylvania, Inc. and The Bank  of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. because they are substantially identical in all material respects to the form of Supplemental Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.1.15 to Aqua America, Inc.’s  Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015:
		

			
	
			
				 1.
			

			
	
			
			Forty-ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 1, 2014




			
	
			
				 2.
			

			
	
			
			Fiftieth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 1, 2015




			
	
			
				 3.
			

			
	
			
			Fifty-first Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 1, 2016




			
	
			
				 4.
			

			
	
			
			Fifty-second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 15, 2017




		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
432.001 Definitions.       The *agency contract finance office* is the office, other than the office of the requisitioner, providing funding or performing funding record keeping for the contract action.          *Responsible fiscal authority* is that officer in the agency contract finance office with the responsibility to ensure that adequate funds are available and usable for the intended purpose.    **Parent topic:** PART 432 - CONTRACT FINANCING
#### § 906.32 Expenses.

The committee is authorized to incur such expenses as the Secretary may find are reasonable and likely to be incurred during each fiscal period for its maintenance and functioning, and for such purposes as the Secretary, pursuant to this subpart, determines to be appropriate. Each handler's share of such expense shall be proportionate to the ratio between the total quantity of fruit handled by him as the first handler thereof during a fiscal period and the total quantity of fruit handled by all handlers as first handlers thereof during such fiscal period.
Case 2:06-cv-00672-WKW-WC Document 1 Filed 07/27/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00672-WKW-WC Document 1 Filed 07/27/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00672-WKW-WC Document 1 Filed 07/27/2006 Page 3 of 3
703.104-7 Violations or possible violations.       Requests for concurrence under paragraph (a)(1) of (48 CFR) FAR 3.104–7 must be forwarded to one level above the contracting officer.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 703.1—Safeguards
#### Gallinger/GMAC Real Estate, Respondent, v Francis W. Roscoe, II, et al., Appellants. The Ginley Family Real Estate Trust, by Michael P. Ginley and Another, as Cotrustees, Respondent, v Francis W. Roscoe, II, et al., Appellants. HMC Management Corp., Respondent, v Francis W. Roscoe, II, et al., Appellants.

Submitted July 16, 2007;

decided October 11, 2007

Reported below, 41 AD3d 1312.

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal in The Ginley Family Real Estate Trust v Roscoe action, dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine that action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
p. 1



# OAR Box 1384 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 175 ) ll-E-13 5 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:09 AM

Sheet 175 of 264P. 2 MAR-//-3 0 ri u i.u o r

w ri£Li

/ OHM.IW : 03/27/8 8 10:1 1 ©181SM1023 4 fA A nv , PE S RI P N

C UiULJUUU J 10002/00 2 

## A 945 ? JiVE - /3 5 Contac tReport *\ Melanie Proctor

, Pacifi c Environmenta

l Services , Inc . (PES ) Date : Marc h 26,199 8 Mr . Colb y Edward s Company : Alte c Industries , In a Telephon e Number : (816 ) 364-224 4 Fa x Number : (816 ) 236-135 2 

# ?H

Contac tSummary : 

# 44-94/ . 

# otvt

CO T 2 21999 , EP A AI R DOCKE T

MS . Proctor explaine

d tha tPE S i s workin

g wit h th e U.S . EP A o n th e developin g o f

a nationa l emissio n standar

d for the reinforce

d plastic composites industry . Ms . Procto r adde d that Alte c Industries , Inc . wa s contacte d to verif y informatio

n provide d i n th e 199 3 EP

A serenin g survey submitted for their facility . Ms . Proctor aske

d Mr . Edward s i f Alte c Industries, Inc . i s usin g an y pollutio n preventio n measures fo r thei r centrifuga l casting process . Ms . Procto r furthe r explaine d tha

tsuc h pollutio n preventto n measures ma

y include 1****2**TM^ o r eliminatio n o f air flo w throug

h th e centrifuga

l castin g machines , no theatin g th e ai r an

d th e «« " AnAng application an d curin g or.th e reductio n i f hazardou s ai r pollutant

s (HAP ) i n th e resin . $fr . Edward s indicate d thatAlte c Industries , Inc . i 7 'no tusin g an

y specia l pollution preventionrneasure&^for.tiut f process. - H e e^Iamcdtha tth e Centrifuga l castin g machines have en d cap s whic

h havejfaHri n the

m tha tprovid e a

n openin g fo i air t o b e move d throug

h (h e spinning mol d durin

g curing. Mr

. Edward s indicated tha

th e di d no t kno w th e exac tair flow rat e throug h tiie mol d a tthe time (Coul d yo u pleas e find ou twha tth e ai r flow rat e throug h th e mol d I s an d i f th e resi n o r th e ai r i s heate d i n th e process ? I f th e ai r o r th e resi n i s heated , eoul d yo n provid e th e temperature?) . Accordin g t o Mr . Edward s th e facilit

y stil l use s th e sam e resins tha twer e reporte d i n th e 199

3 scieenm g surve

y whic h ar

e polyeste r flex rea m a ta HA P conten

to f 3 0 percen tan d unsaturate

d

INFORMATION I S ACCURATE . 

## H fat* fs fhrktUeJ

/ A Ji* frecctS


# j( ETZAS/AIO. 

# pfaa is. used? &rCoo Ay t 

# n*± £**~ £+r-t*£. f-Llps too /

/**/& *£for<#otferM'<~-
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

CLARENCE WATERS, #132116, )

)

 Petitioner, )

)

 ) CASE NO. 2:06-CV-650-MEF v.

)

KENNETH JONES, et al., )

)

 Respondents. )

ORDER ON MOTION

Upon consideration of the motion for extension of time filed by the respondents on

October 11, 2006 (Court Doc. No. 11), and for good cause, it is

ORDERED that this motion be and is hereby GRANTED. It is further 

ORDERED that the respondents be GRANTED an extension from October 11, 2006

to and including October 25, 2006 to file their supplemental answer in compliance with the

order entered on September 26, 2006. The respondents are cautioned that no further

extensions of time will be allowed without a showing of exceptional circumstances

warranting such action. 

DONE, this 17th day of October, 2006.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 2:06-cv-00650-MEF-SRW Document 12 Filed 10/17/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

 

Case 2:06-cv-00650-MEF-SRW Document 12 Filed 10/17/2006 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JUAN RAMON JIMENEZ-PABON,

A# 024-456-131,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO.: 4:20cv272-MW/MAF

WILLIAM BARR, et al.,

Respondents. 

_________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate’s report and 

recommendation, ECF No. 12. No objections have been filed. Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The report and recommendation, ECF No. 12, is ACCEPTED and 

ADOPTED as this Court’s opinion. 

2. Petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel, ECF No. 11, is DENIED. 

3. The Clerk must enter judgment stating “The Petition for Writ of Habeas 

Corpus, ECF No. 1, is DENIED.” 

4. The Clerk must close the file. 

SO ORDERED on October 27, 2020.

s/Mark E. Walker 

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00272-MW-MAF Document 13 Filed 10/27/20 Page 1 of 1
§ 932.29 Nominations. ( a ) *Producer members.* ( 1 ) Nominations for producer members of the committee, and their respective alternates, may be conducted according to the following procedures, or other procedures recommended by the committee and approved by the Secretary: ( i ) Meetings shall be held in each producer district for the purpose of selecting candidates for the member and alternate member nominations;
( ii ) Those candidates selected at the producer meetings shall be nominated by mail balloting of producers in that district;
( iii ) The committee shall adopt, with approval of the Secretary, appropriate procedures to be observed for conducting producer nominations by mail: *Provided,* That the names of nominees shall be submitted to the Secretary prior to April 16 of the year in which nominations are made.
( 2 ) Only producers, including duly authorized officers or employees of producers, shall participate in the nomination of producer members and alternate members. Each producer shall be entitled to cast only one vote for each nominee to be selected in the district in which the producer produces olives. No producer shall participate in the selection of nominees in more than one district. If a producer produces olives in more than one district, such producer shall select the district in which such producer will so participate and notify the committee of such choice.
( b ) *Handler members.* ( 1 ) At a meeting or meetings called by the committee, the cooperative handlers shall nominate a qualified person for each member position and a qualified person for each alternate member position allocated to cooperative handlers as provided in § 932.25.
( 2 ) At a meeting or meetings called by the committee, the independent handlers shall nominate a qualified person for each member position and a qualified person for each alternate member position allocated to independent handlers as provided in § 932.25.
( 3 ) Each handler shall be entitled to cast only one vote for each nominee for cooperative handler member or alternate member or independent handler member or alternate member, as the case may be, which vote shall be weighed by the tonnages of olives handled by such handler during the crop year in which nominations are made and in the previous crop year.
( c ) *Public member.* Nominations for the public member and alternate public member of the committee shall be submitted to the Secretary prior to April 16 of the year in which nominations are made. The committee shall prescribe procedures for the selection and voting for each candidate.
[33 FR 11266, Aug. 8, 1968, as amended at 47 FR 32907, July 30, 1982]