alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### St. George’s Syrian Catholic Church, Respondent-Appellant, v. Eisenstein Associates, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Heyward-Robinson Company, Inc., et al., Appellants-Respondents.

Judgment entered September 8, 1969, unanimously modified on the law and on the facts, to strike the award of $75,000 consequential damages against Heyward-Robinson Company, Inc., and to enjoin Trinity Garage, Inc., from operating the garage elevators in their premises adjacent to plaintiff’s property commencing 60 days from entry of the order herein and continuing until the sum of $75,000 is paid to the plaintiff. The judgment is otherwise affirmed, wtihout costs and without disbursements. Permanent damages may only be awarded in lieu of the permanent injunction to which a plaintiff is entitled. *{Boomer*v. *Atlantic Cement Co.,*26 N Y 2d 219; *Haber*v. *Paramount Ice Corp.,*239 App. Div. 324, 328, affd. 264 N. Y. 98; *Slobodkina*v. *Village of Great Neck,*285 App. Div. 908, 909.) Trinity as owner and operator of the offending garage is in sole control. It has the sole power to discontinue the nuisance. Trinity will be the sole beneficiary of the continued use of its garage. Under these circumstances it was error for Trial Term to have east Heyward, the general contractor who built the garage, in consequential damages. Upon this record, a permanent injunction against Trinity was warranted. But under the circumstances, the continuance of the permanent injunction should be conditioned upon payment of the $75,000 as permanent damages. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Eager, McGivern and Nunez, JJ.
#### § 955.40 Expenses.

The committee is authorized to incur such expenses as the Secretary may find are reasonable and likely to be incurred by the committee for its maintenance and functioning, and to enable it to exercise its powers and perform its duties in accordance with the provisions of this part. The funds to cover such expenses shall be acquired in the manner prescribed in §§ 955.42 and 955.45.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS2724 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
#### § 959.123 Approval.

The committee or its duly authorized agents shall give prompt consideration to each application for a Certificate of Privilege. Approval of an application, based upon the determination as to whether the information contained therein and other information available to the committee supports approval, shall be evidenced by the issuance of a Certificate of Privilege to the applicant. Each certificate shall cover a specified period and specified qualities and quantities of onions to be sold or transported to a designated consignee for the purpose declared.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

WILLIAM D. BOWDEN, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

 )

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv665-WHA

 )

MISSION PETROLEUM CARRIERS, et al., )

 )

Defendants. )

ORDER

This case is before the court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Extend the Expert Disclosure

Deadline (Doc. #17). 

For good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED to the following extent:

1. The deadline for full disclosure as to expert witnesses is extended from January 9,

2007 to February 9, 2007, for the Plaintiff, and the deadline for full disclosure as to experts is

continued from February 9, 2007 to March 9, 2007 for the Defendants. 

2. The court is agreeable to resetting the trial of this case for the term commencing

December 10, 2007, with new deadlines appropriate for that term. If the parties wish to do this,

they should by January 30, 2007, file a Revised Report of Parties Planning Meeting setting out

any requested changes in currently established deadlines.

DONE this 16th day of January, 2007.

/s/ W. Harold Albritton 

W. HAROLD ALBRITTON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 18 Filed 01/16/2007 Page 1 of 1
1301.707 Signatory authority.

Signatory authority for determinations and findings (D&Fs) is specified in the FAR for the associated

subject matter unless otherwise noted in CAM 1301.70.

Parent topic: Subpart 1301.7 - Determinations and Findings
# L_2014070EN.01003601.xml

| 11.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 70/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 70/36

---

Council Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 of 5 March 2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 66 of 6 March 2014
  )

Page 7, Annex I, entry 12, Serhii Petrovych Kliuiev, column ‘Identifying information’

for:

‘born on 12 August 1969, businessman, brother of Mr. Andrii K1iuiev’

read:

‘born on 19 August 1969, businessman, brother of Mr. Andrii Kliuiev’.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DWISION

28Jjg P 3:[7 BARBARAJEFFERS, and )

JOANCRAIG,

Plaintiffs, ALA,

) CV 3:06-cv-685-WKW

Vs.

RUSSELL COUNTY BOARD OF

EDUCATION, et aL,

Defendants. )

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

COMES NOW the undersigned, Theron Stokes, and hereby gives notice of his

appearance as additional counsel for the Plaintiffs, Barbara Jeffers and Joan Craig, in the

above-styled mailer.

Respectfully submitted,

OF COUNSEL:

ALABAMA EDUCATION ASSOCIATION

P.O. Box 4177

Montgomery, AL 36103-4177

(334) 834-9790

Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 53 Filed 01/18/2008 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this the /X /7 day of January, 2008, I have served a

copy of the foregoing upon all counsel and by placing a copy of same in the United States

mail, postage paid and addressed as follows:

Sydney Smith, Esq.

1503 Broad Street

Phenix City, AL 36867

Matthew C. Williams

3800 Colonade Parkway

Birmingham, AL 35243

cc: W. Don Eddins, Esq.

Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 53 Filed 01/18/2008 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00620-WKW-CSC Document 1-2 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 1 of 1
Subpart 1344.3 - Contractors' Purchasing

Systems Reviews

Parent topic: PART 1344 - SUBCONTRACTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

1344.302 Requirements.

The designee authorized to lower or raise the $25 million sales threshold for performing a review to

determine if a contractor purchasing system review is needed is set forth in CAM 1301.70.
§ 906.137 Handlers use of identifying marks utilized by the committee in promotional and advertising projects. ( a ) Pursuant to § 906.37, the identifying marks “Texasweet”, “Sweeter By Nature”, “Texas Fancy”, and “Texas Choice” shall be available to handlers only under the following terms and conditions: ( 1 ) The identifying marks “Texasweet” and “Sweeter by Nature” may severally or jointly be affixed only to containers of grapefruit or to individual grapefruit comprising a lot which grades at least U.S. No. 1.
( 2 ) The identifying mark “Texas Fancy” may be affixed only to containers of grapefruit or to individual grapefruit comprising a lot which grades at least U.S. No. 1 with no more than 40 percent of the surface of the grapefruit, in the aggregate, affected by discoloration.
( 3 ) The identifying mark “Texas Choice” may be affixed only to containers of grapefruit or to individual grapefruit comprising a lot which grades at least U.S. No. 2, with no more than 60 percent of the surface of the grapefruit, in the aggregate, affected by discoloration.
( 4 ) The identifying marks “Texasweet” and “Sweeter by Nature” may severally or jointly be affixed only to containers of oranges or to individual oranges comprising a lot which grades at least U.S. Combination, with not less than 60 percent, by count, of the oranges in each container thereof grading at least U.S. No. 1 and the remainder U.S. No. 2.
( 5 ) The identifying mark “Texas Choice” may be affixed only to containers of oranges or to individual oranges comprising a lot which grades at least U.S. No. 2, except that in determining whether the fruit is reasonably well colored the yellow or orange color must predominate over the green color on at least 75 percent of the fruit surface in the aggregate which is not discolored.
( b ) When used herein, terms relating to grade shall have the same meaning as is given to the respective term in the U.S. Standards for Grapefruit (Texas and States other than Florida, California, and Arizona) (7 CFR 51.620 through 51.653) and in the U.S. Standards for Oranges (Texas and States other than Florida, California, and Arizona) (7 CFR 51.680 through 51.714).
[33 FR 14069, Sept. 17, 1968, as amended at 53 FR 40398, Oct. 17, 1988; 53 FR 50916, Dec. 19, 1988; 70 FR 51578, Aug. 31, 2005]
-1-

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

ELIZABETH LYNNE HUTCHINSON, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO:

vs. ) CV-06-00700-WHA

) JURY DEMAND

)

PHENIX CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION, )

LARRY E. DICHIARA, officially as )

as Superintendent of the Phenix City Schools )

)

)

Defendants. )

JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND TRIAL DATE

COMES NOW, the Parties by and through undersigned counsel and respectfully requests

this Court to enter an Order continuing the trial date in this matter from March 3, 2008 until June

23, 2008. As grounds for said motion, the Parties state the following:

1. Both attorneys for Plaintiff are scheduled for trial in the case of Winnifred

Blackledge Alabama Department of Mental Health & Mental Retardation, et. al. 2:06-CV-321-

SRW on February 25, 2008. Counsel for Plaintiff believes that due to the docket schedule and

due to the possible and anticipated length of this trial, the Blackledge trial may move into conflict

with the trial of the Hutchinson case, which is currently scheduled for March 3, 2008. (See Dkt.

# 55).

2. Counsel for Defendant also believes that scheduling the trial during the summer

will be beneficial to her clients who are employed by the Phenix City Board of Education.

Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 58 Filed 12/04/2007 Page 1 of 3
-2-

3. Counsel for Plaintiff has discussed this with Counsel for Defendant who is in

agreement that such extension will not prejudice any party and the parties jointly file this motion.

The extension will also allow the parties more time to schedule a mediation in this case.

4. June 23, 2008 is the next available civil trial term in Opelika.

5. The parties also request a new pretrial hearing date until a reasonable time prior to

the new trial date from the currently scheduled date of February 1, 2008.

Wherefore premises considered, the Parties respectfully request this Court enter an Order

continuing the trial date to June 23, 2008 and any other relief this Court deems just.

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Joshua D. Wilson

Rocco Calamusa, Jr.

Joshua D. Wilson

Attorneys for the Plaintiff

OF COUNSEL

WIGGINS, CHILDS, QUINN & PANTAZIS, LLC

The Kress Building

301 19

th Street North

Birmingham, Alabama 35203

(205) 314-0500

s/ Sydney S. Smith

Sydney S. Smith

Smith & Smith, PC

Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 58 Filed 12/04/2007 Page 2 of 3
-3-

1503 Broad Street

Phenix City, AL 36867

Attorney for the Defendants

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I do hereby certify that on this the 4

th

day of December, 2007, I electronically filed

the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification

of such filing to the following:

Sydney S. Smith

Smith & Smith, PC

1503 Broad Street

Phenix City, AL 36867

/s/ Joshua D. Wilson

OF COUNSEL

Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 58 Filed 12/04/2007 Page 3 of 3
### 1/2 

## EASA EMERGENCY AIRW ORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

AD No. : 2006 - 0228-E

Date: 27 July 2006

No person may operate an aircraft to which an Airworthiness Directive applies, except in accordance with the requirements of that Airworthiness Directive unless otherwi se agreed with the Authority of the State of Registry. 

### Type Approval Holder’s Name :

Agusta S.p.a. 

### Type/Model designation(s) :

A109A, AII, C, K2, E, S, LUH A119
TCDS Number : EASA.R.005
Foreign AD : None
Supersedure : None



### ATA 64 Tail Rotor - Tail Rotor Pitch Control Link Assy P/N 109-0130-05-117

Manufacturer: Agusta S.p.a.
Applicability: Agusta helicopters A109A, AII, C, K2, E, S, LUH and A119 that install tail rotor pitch control link assy P/N 109-0130-05 -117 with s/n from MO001 up to s/n MO773 (included) with less than 100 (one hundred) flight hours and/or in stock. The tail rotor pitch control link a ssy P/N 109-0130-05-117 with S/N MOxxx and identified with the letter “T” after the S/N, do not require the compliance with this AD.
Reason: On an helicopter A109E, it has been experienced a failure of the tail rotor pitch control link assy 109-0130-05-117 with 10 FH. The preliminary investigation made by t he TCH Agusta has revealed that the failure has been caused by a production defect.
Effective Date: 28 July 2006
Compliance: The following measures are rend ered mandatory as from the effective date of this AD: Upon receipt of this AD and before next flight as applicable for helicopter in service the inspections of the tail rotor pitch control link 109-0130-05-117 for conditions, in accordance with the instructions reported in the Agusta Alert SB 109-122, 109K-47, 109EP-70, 109S-5, 109L-001, 119-15 (as applicable in function of the helicopter model).
Ref. Publications: Agusta - Alert Service Bulletin 109-122;

### 2/2 Agusta - Alert Service Bulletin 109K-47; Agusta - Alert Service Bulletin 109EP-70; Agusta - Alert Service Bulletin 109S-5; Agusta - Alert Service Bulletin 109L-001; Agusta - Alert Service Bulletin 119-15 original issue or later approved revisions.
Remarks: 1. If requested and appropriately substantiat ed the responsible EASA manager for the related product has the authorit y to accept Alternative Method of Compliance (AMOCs) for this AD. 2. The safety assessment has request not to implement the full consultation process and an immediate pub lication and notification. 3. Enquiries regarding this Airworthiness Directive should be referred to Mr. M. Capaccio, Airworthiness Directive Foca l Point – Certification Directorate, EASA. E-mail: ADs@easa.europa.eu

. 4. For any questions concerning the techni cal content of the requirements in this AD, please contact: Agusta S.p.a. Cust omer Support – Via per Tornavento, 15 21019 Somma Lombardo (VA) - Italy; Phone + 39 0331 711296 ; Fax : +39 0331 711180 ; 

### E -mail : custserv@it.agusta.com

.
1305.502 Authority.       The designee authorized to provide authorization for publication of paid advertisements in newspapers is set forth in CAM 1301.70. The contracting officer shall obtain written authorization from the designee.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1305.5 - Paid Advertisements
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3099 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3099

     To suspend temporarily the duty on seal assemblies, rear spar.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

 Mr. Brownback introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the duty on seal assemblies, rear spar.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SEAL ASSEMBLIES, REAR SPAR.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.59.11        Seal assemblies, rear   Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           spar (provided for in                                             31/2009          ''
                           subheading                                                                          .
                           5911.90.00)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 97.104 Application or certificate abandoned. ( a ) Upon request by the Office, the owner shall replenish the seed or propagating material of the variety and shall pay the handling fee for replenishment. Samples of seed or propagating material related to abandoned applications or certificates will be retained or destroyed by the depository. Failure to replenish seed or propagating material within 3 months from the date of request shall result in the certificate being regarded as abandoned. No sooner than 1 year after the date of such request, notices of abandoned certificates shall be published on the Plant Variety Protection Office website (*https://www.ams.usda.gov/PVPO*), indicating that the variety has become open for use by the public and, if previously specified to be sold by variety name as “certified seed only,” that such restriction no longer applies.
( b ) If the seed or propagating material is submitted within 9 months of the final due date, it may be accepted by the Commissioner as though no abandonment had occurred. For good cause, the Commissioner may extend for a reasonable time the period for submitting seed or propagating material before declaring the certificate abandoned.
( c ) A certificate may be voluntarily abandoned by the applicant or his or her attorney or agent of record or the assignee of record by notifying the Commissioner in writing. Upon receipt of such notice, the Commissioner shall publish a notice on the Plant Variety Protection Office website (*https://www.ams.usda.gov/PVPO*) that the variety has become open for use by the public, and if previously specified to be sold by variety name as “certified seed only,” that such restriction no longer applies.
[85 FR 432, Jan. 6, 2020]
#### SCHIRMER et al., Respondents, v. DEAN et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 15, 1906.)

Action by Joseph Schirmer and others against George N. Dean and others.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
52.247-67 Submission of Transportation Documents for Audit.       As prescribed in 47.103-2, insert the following clause:          Submission of Transportation Documents for Audit (Feb 2006)                                       (a) 						            The Contractor shall submit to the address identified below, for prepayment audit, transportation documents on which the United States will assume freight charges that were paid-                                                         (1) 								                By the Contractor under a cost-reimbursement contract; and                                                            (2) 								                By a first-tier subcontractor under a cost-reimbursement subcontract thereunder.                                                                             (b) 						            Cost-reimbursement Contractors shall only submit for audit those bills of lading with freight shipment charges exceeding $100. Bills under $100 shall be retained on-site by the Contractor and made available for on-site audits. This exception only applies to freight shipment bills and is not intended to apply to bills and invoices for any other transportation services.                                          (c) 						            Contractors shall submit the above referenced transportation documents to-                ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________                [*To be filled in by Contracting Officer*]                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.247 [Reserved]
§ 760.1706 Fair market value of milk. ( a ) The FSA county committee will determine the fair market value of the affected farmer's dumped milk, which, for the purposes of this subpart, will be the sum of the net proceeds such farmer would have received for normal marketings in each of the pay periods in the application period but for the qualifying disaster event.
( b ) The base period per cow average daily milk production is determined by dividing the full month of milk marketings by the average number of cows in milk production for that month and the number of days in that month. To determine the milk loss payment, the base period per cow average daily milk production is multiplied by the number of milking cows in production for the claim period and by the number of days milk was removed or dumped in the claim period with the result divided by 100 to determine the applicable hundredweight and then multiplied by the hundredweight pay price.
( c ) To determine the hundredweight pay price for milk, the FSA county committee will deduct from the gross pay price from the claim period milk marketing statement the per hundredweight hauling rate for the applicable month and the per hundredweight $0.15 promotion fee which it determines are normally incurred by the affected farmer but which were not incurred because of the removal of the farmer's milk from the commercial market.
[84 FR 48534, Sept. 13, 2019. Redesignated and amended at 88 FR 62290, Sept. 11, 2023]
EX-35 (i)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

March 12, 2007

GS Mortgage Securities Corporation
85 Broad Street
New York, NY 10004

RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for GSAA Home Equity Trust 2006-15

Per Section 13.04 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of 9/1/2006,
the undersigned Officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Master Servicer), hereby
certifies the following for the 2006 calendar year or portion thereof:

(i)     a review of such party's activities during the preceding calendar year
        or portion thereof and of such party's performance under this Agreement,
        or such other applicable agreement in the case of an Additional
        Servicer, has been made under such officer's supervision and

(ii)    to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such
        party has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement, or such
        other applicable agreement in the case of an Additional Servicer, in
        all material respects throughout such year or portion thereof, or, if
        there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material
        respect, specifying each such failure known to such officer and the
        nature and status thereof.

Certified By:
/s/ Kristen Ann Cronin
Kristen Ann Cronin, Vice President

Certified By:
/s/ Gordon Johnson
Gordon Johnson, Assistant Secretary
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

§ 868.259 Percentages. ( a ) *Rounding.* Percentages are determined on the basis of weight and are rounded as follows: ( 1 ) When the figure to be rounded is followed by a figure greater than or equal to 5, round to the next higher figure; e.g., report 6.36 as 6.4, 0.35 as 0.4, and 2.45 as 2.5.
( 2 ) When the figure to be rounded is followed by a figure less than 5, retain the figure, e.g., report 8.34 as 8.3 and 1.22 and 1.2.
( b ) *Recording.* All percentages, except for milling yield, are stated in whole and tenth percent to the nearest whole percent. Milling yield is stated to the nearest whole percent.
[54 FR 21406, May 18, 1989. Redesignated at 60 FR 16364, Mar. 30, 1995]