alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

WILLIAM D. BOWDEN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No.: 2:06-CV-665

)

MISSION PETROLEUM CARRIERS, )

ANTONIO MARTINEZ NAVARRO )

)

Defendants. )

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW MOTION FOR CONTEMPT 

AND/OR MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION AND COMPLIANCE

 WITH SUBPOENA TO A NON-PARTY 

COMES NOW the Plaintiff by and through undersigned counsel and respectfully

withdraws its motion to compel against non-party Southeast Pallet and Box Company and owner

Woody Griffin. In support of this withdrawal motion, Plaintiff shows the following:

1. Today Plaintiff’s counsel spoke with Mr. Woody Griffin, owner of Southeast Pallet

and Box and/or Southern Carriers, the employer of Plaintiff Bowden at the time of this collision. 

Mr. Griffin advised counsel that neither himself, Southeast Pallet and Box and/or Southern

Carriers has any photographs pertaining to this litigation and/or any other documents previously

requested in the non-party subpoena directed to his company. 

WHEREFORE, the above premises considered, Plaintiff respectfully withdraws it’s

motion to compel filed against non-party Southeast Pallet and Box and owner Woody Griffin.

 Respectfully submitted on this 16th day of April, 2007.

OF COUNSEL:

McPHILLIPS, SHINBAUM, L.L.P.

516 S. Perry Street

P. O. Box 64 /s/ James G. Bodin 

Montgomery, Alabama 36101 JAMES G. BODIN (BOD005)

(334) 262-1911

Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 38 Filed 04/16/2007 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have served a copy of the document(s) above via email and/or U.S.

Mail, postage prepaid, to the following attorneys of record, on this the 11th day of April, 2007:

Caroline T. Pryor, Esq.

CARR ALLISON

P.O. Box 1126

Daphne, AL 36526

251-626-9340

ctp@carrallison.com

 /s/ James G. Bodin 

Of Counsel

Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 38 Filed 04/16/2007 Page 2 of 2
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MICHAEL ALEXANDER LEE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-3290

[December 12, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Glenn D. Kelley, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2016CF008738.

Gary L. Pickett, West Palm Beach, (withdrawn as counsel after filing 

briefs), and Thomas Montgomery, Belle Glade, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Joseph D. Coronato, 

Jr., Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, GERBER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Part 5646 - QUALITY ASSURANCE       Subpart 5646.7 - WARRANTIES                                                         5646.706 Warranty Terms and Conditions.    Subpart 5646.7 - WARRANTIES     5646.706 Warranty Terms and Conditions.    Contracts containing a warranty clause will not be closed out before the warranty period has expired.              HQ, United States Special Operations Command       Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L-K)       SOFARS 5646       February 2007
#### § 948.10 Fiscal period.

*Fiscal period* means the period beginning and ending on the dates approved by the Secretary pursuant to recommendations by an area committee.
§ 5001.508 Mergers. *Agency approval.* All borrower mergers or consolidations (herein referred to as “mergers”) require approval by the Agency and the lender. The Agency may approve a merger when— ( a ) The resulting organization will be eligible for a guaranteed loan and assumes all the liabilities and acquires all the assets of the merged borrower;
( b ) The merger is in the best interest of the government and the merging organization;
( c ) The resulting organization can meet all required conditions as contained in specific loan agreements; and
( d ) All property can be legally transferred to the resulting organization.
EX-35 (a)
(logo) OCWEN


ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB

March 8, 2007

RE: ACE 2006-HE4

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period"), Ocwen Loan
Servicing, LLC ("OLS") furnishes this annual servicer compliance statement
pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB, indicating its compliance with the
servicing standards of the Securities & Exchange Commission as set forth in
Regulation AB, 17 CFR Section 229.1100, et seq., ("Regulation AB"). In this
regard, I make the following representations, which are true to the best of my
knowledge and belief in all material respects.

1.   A review of the servicing activities of OLS during the Reporting Period,
     and of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as
     of September 1, 2006 (the "Agreement"), has been performed under my
     supervision.

2.   To the best of my knowledge, based on this review, OLS has fulfilled all of
     its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the
     Reporting Period.

By: /s/ Ronald M. Faris
Name:  Ronald M. Faris
Title: President


Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC
1661 Worthington Road Suite 100
Centrepark West
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3112 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3112

  To suspend temporarily the duty on automated robotic drill systems.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

 Mr. Brownback introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on automated robotic drill systems.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTOMATED ROBOTIC DRILL SYSTEMS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.84.65        Automated robotic       Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           drill systems                                                     31/2009          ''
                           (provided for in                                                                    .
                           subheading
                           8465.95.00)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### ARNHEIM, Respondent, v. LINCH, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 12, 1914.)

Action by Louis Arnheim against George W. Linch, as receiver, etc.

C. E. Chalmers, of New York City, for appellant.

A. C. Kellogg, of New York City, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Order filed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DEBRA BEYAH, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06cv659-CSC

)

WAL-MART STORES, INC.,, )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

The parties are hereby reminded of the obligation, imposed by Rule 26(f) of the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure, to confer and to develop a proposed discovery plan and other

information as required for filing the report of the parties’ planning meeting. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the Rule 26(f) report containing the discovery plan shall be filed as soon

as practicable but not later than October 6, 2006.

The longstanding practice in this district is that dispositive motions shall be filed no later

than 90 days prior to the pretrial date. If the parties seek to vary from that schedule, they should

present, in the plan, specific case related reasons for the requested variance. This case will be set

for trial before the undersigned judge during one of that judge's regularly scheduled civil trial

terms. The pretrial date is normally set within 4 - 6 weeks of a scheduled trial term. The dates of

each judges civil trial terms are available on the court's website, www.almd.uscourts.gov. The

scheduling order which the court will enter willfollow the form of the Uniform Scheduling Order

adopted by the Judges of this court. The Uniform Scheduling Order is also available on the court's

website. The report of the parties should comply with Form 35 of the Appendix of Forms to the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as well as the requirements of this order.

Done this 15 day of September, 2006. th

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00659-CSC Document 11 Filed 09/15/2006 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

 _______________________________

JEREMIAH W. GREEN *

Plaintiff, *

 v. * 2:06-CV-667-WKW

 

AJA ROBERTS *

Defendant. *

 _______________________________

ORDER ON MOTION

Upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time, and for good cause,

it is ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. No. 21), is GRANTED;

2. Plaintiff is GRANTED an extension from November 8, 2006 to December 7, 2006

to file a response to Defendant's answer and written report.

Done, this 15th day of November 2006.

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 26 Filed 11/15/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### § 948.13 Pack.

*Pack* means a quantity of potatoes in any type of container, which falls within specific weight limits, numerical limits, grade limits, or any combination of these recommended by the committee and approved by the Secretary.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 26, 2009 

jm 

Order 

 

January 26, 2009 

138110 (15) 

DARRIN LA PINE, 

 Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 138110 

 COA: 288393 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

___________________________________ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it 

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be 

liable for filing fees. 

 Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the 

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $44.00, shall submit a copy of this order 

with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned 

with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being 

filed in this Court. 

 If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly 

payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of 

the deposits made to plaintiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of 

$331.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court. 

 Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in this 

Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. 

 The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and 

return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.
Subpart 1339.1 - General

Parent topic: PART 1339 - ACQUISITION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

1339.107 Contract clauses.

Insert clause 1352.239-70, Software License Addendum, in all contracts when the primary purpose

is to purchase new software licenses or renew existing licenses.

1339.107-70 Information security.

(a) For all service acquisitions over the micro-purchase threshold, contracting professionals shall

coordinate with the designated Contracting Officer Representative (COR) to complete the

Information Security in Acquisition Checklist.

(b) When the Information Security in Acquisition Checklist indicates that Clause 1352.239-73,

Security Requirements for Information Technology Resources, is needed, contracting officers shall

insert the clause in the solicitation and contracts. If the checklist indicates that the Certification and

Accreditation requirement in Clause 1352.239-73 is not required, the contracting officer shall

include the statement “The Certification and Accreditation (C&A) requirements of Clause

1352.239-73 do not apply, and a Security Accreditation Package is not required” in the statement of

work.

(c) Contracting professionals shall insert the appropriate risk designation clause from CAM 1337.70

into DOC solicitations and contracts for services depending upon the level of contractor access

privileges to DOC IT systems. In addition, contracting professionals shall document the official

contract file to include the rationale for the designated risk level.
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C SECTION 1350)**

 

The undersigned, as the Chief Financial Officer ofVideo Display Corporation, certifies that, to the best of his knowledge andbelief, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31,2004 (the “Report”), which accompanies this certification, fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Video DisplayCorporation at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoingcertification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any otherpurpose.

 
| This 15th  day of October, 2004 | /s/ Gregory A. Kittle   |   |
|---------------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                            | Gregory A. Kittle       |
|                            | Chief Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to Video Display Corporation and will be retained by VideoDisplay Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

 

The information in this Exhibit 32.1 shall not bedeemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in anyfiling under the Securities Act of 1933, except as shall be expressly set forthby specific reference in such filing.

 

1

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA OF

NORTHERN DIVISION

MAY'S DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, )

INC., individually and as class )

representative of all those gasoline )

station owners similarly situated, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-702-MEF

)

TOTAL CONTAINMENT, INC., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the Joint Motion for Extending Time to Respond to

Plaintiff's Fourth Amended Complaint (Doc. #55) filed on October 4, 2006, it is hereby

ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED.

DONE this the 16th day of October, 2006.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 58 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### 135 West 36th LLC et al., Respondents, v World City America Inc. et al., Defendants, and Charles Gallagher et al., Appellants.

Submitted June 18, 2007;

decided October 11, 2007

Reported below, 34 AD3d 317.

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied *[see*8 NY3d 979 (2007)].
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

STEVE ADAMS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06-CV-707-ID

)

MERCHANTS FOODSERVICE, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

O R D E R

Upon CONSIDERATION of Defendant Merchants FoodService’s Motion to Submit

a Revised Declaration of Andy Mercier in Support of Its Motion for Summary Judgment

(Doc. No. 23, filed September 21, 2007), and for good cause shown, it is ORDERED that

said motion be and the same is hereby GRANTED.

DONE this 25 day of September, 2007. th

/s/ Ira DeMent 

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00707-ID-CSC Document 25 Filed 09/25/2007 Page 1 of 1
52.246-13 Inspection-Dismantling,

Demolition, or Removal of Improvements.

As prescribed in 46.313 , insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts for dismantling,

demolition, or removal of improvements:

Inspection-Dismantling, Demolition, or Removal of Improvements (Aug 1996)

(a) Unless otherwise designated by the specifications, all workmanship performed under the

contract is subject to Government inspection at all times and places where dismantling or demolition

work is being performed. The Contractor shall furnish promptly, and at no increase in contract price,

all reasonable facilities, labor, and materials necessary for safe and convenient inspection by the

Government. The Government shall perform inspections in a manner that will not unduly delay the

work.

(b) The Contractor is responsible for damage to property caused by defective workmanship. The

Contractor shall promptly segregate and remove from the premises any unsatisfactory facilities,

materials, and equipment used in contract performance, and promptly replace them with

satisfactory items. If the Contractor fails to proceed at once in a workmanlike manner with

performance of the work or with the correction of defective workmanship, the Government may-

(1) By contract or otherwise, replace the facilities, materials, and equipment or correct the

workmanship and charge the cost to the Contractor; and

(2) Terminate for default the Contractor’s right to proceed. The Contractor and any surety shall be

liable, to the extent specified in the contract for any damage or cost of repair or replacement.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.246 [Reserved]
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 2:06-cr-179-MHT-DRB

 )

JOHN TIERCE )

GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO AWARD 3 POINTS TO DEFENDANT

FOR ACCEPTANCE OF RESPONSIBILITY

PURSUANT TO § 3E1.1, UNITED STATES SENTENCING GUIDELINES

COMES NOW the United States of America, by and through Leura G. Canary,

United States Attorney for the Middle District of Alabama, and files the above-captioned

motion, and as reasons therefore, submits the following:

1. The Defendant timely notified the United States he intended to enter a plea of

guilty. An Information was filed in the Middle District of Alabama against Defendant and

the defendant promptly pleaded guilty.

2. Pursuant to United States Sentencing Guidelines § 3E1.1(b), as amended, the

United States makes this formal motion for a one-level reduction in Defendant’s offense

level for acceptance of responsibility, such that the total reduction in offense level for

Defendant’s acceptance of responsibility shall be three (3) levels.

Respectfully submitted, this the 13th day of October, 2006.

LEURA G. CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

s/Terry F. Moorer

TERRY F. MOORER ASB-1176-O73T

Assistant United States Attorney

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334)223-7280 Fax: (334)223-7135 

E-mail: terry.moorer@usdoj.gov

Case 2:06-cr-00179-MHT-CSC Document 11 Filed 10/13/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 2:06-cr-179-MHT-DRB

 )

JOHN TIERCE )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on October 13, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with the

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to

the following: Jeffery C. Duffey, Esquire.

Respectfully submitted,

s/Terry F. Moorer

TERRY F. MOORER

Assistant United States Attorney

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334)223-7280

Fax: (334)223-7135

E-mail: terry.moorer@usdoj.gov

ASB-1176-O73T

 

Case 2:06-cr-00179-MHT-CSC Document 11 Filed 10/13/2006 Page 2 of 2
SUBPART 3.1 — SAFEGUARDS

Parent topic: PART 3 –– IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF

INTEREST

3.101 Standards of conduct.

3.101-3 Agency regulations.

The DoD Directive 5500.07, Standards of Conduct, DoD 5500.07-R, Joint Ethics Regulation, DISA

Instruction 100-50-06, Standards of Ethical Conduct, and DISA Employees’ Guide to the Standards

of Conduct, provide extensive agency guidance governing this topic.

Contact General Counsel (GC) with any questions.

3.104-3 Statutory and related prohibitions, restrictions, and

requirements.

(S-90) All Agency personnel are required to sign a one-time non-disclosure agreement (NDA) which

lasts for the duration of DISA employment. In addition, Contracting Officers will require a separate

signed source selection specific NDA.

(S-91) Any e-mail relating to an acquisition (e.g., discussing details or providing requirement

documents) must be digitally signed/encrypted. See DISAI 630- 230-30 for e-mail security practices

for the transmission of sensitive but unclassified information.

3.104-4 Disclosure, protection, and marking of contractor

bid or proposal information and source selection

information.

(a) The HCA is delegated the authority to authorize access to contractor bid or proposal or source

selection information.

(S-90) All DISA personnel who have access to sensitive acquisition information must ensure proper

handling of such information in order to maintain the integrity of the acquisition process.

Unclassified sensitive acquisition information shall only be distributed on a “need to know” basis.

(S-91) All emails containing source selection sensitive info shall be sent encrypted and/or password

protected. Include the following text in the subject line and at the beginning and end of the e-mail

text:
“SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 & 3.104”.

3.104-6 Ethics advisory opinions regarding prohibitions on a

former officials acceptance of compensation from a

contractor.

(a) Written request for an ethic advisory opinion shall be submitted to the DISA Designated Agency

Ethics Official (DAEO). Per DISAI 100-50-6, the DAEO is the General Counsel.

3.104-7 Violations or possible violations.

(a)(1) The Vice Procurement Services Executive (V/PSE) is the designee.

(2) The contracting officer’s conclusion will be coordinated with GC and submitted to the V/PSE for

review and signature

(S-90) Contractor personnel who suspect a violation of the Procurement Integrity Act are

encouraged to contact the contracting officer or the DISA Inspector General with a written

allegation containing the elements specified in FAR 3.904, Procedures for filing complaints.
5217.7405 Plans and Reports.

(a)(2) HCAs shall submit by April 15 and October 15 a Consolidated Undefinitized Contract Action

(UCA) Management Report, identifying each UCA and unpriced change order with an estimated

value of more than $5 million.

(b) In the format prescribed at Annex 6, submit the required UCA report to DASN(P) by email at

Policy@navy.mil with the subject “DFARS 217.7405 - UCA Management Report” followed by the

applicable reporting period/year (e.g. UCA Management Report: April 15, 2014).

Parent topic: Subpart 5217.74 - UNDEFINITIZED CONTRACT ACTIONS
#### § 900.50 Words in the singular form.

Words in this subpart in the singular form shall be deemed to import the plural, and vice versa, as the case may demand.