alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2  I, Hongcheng Liu, in my capacity indicated below, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of China Shuangji Cement Ltd. (the Registrant); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and   procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusion about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; 5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  Date: April 15, 2008 /s/ Hongcheng Liu Hongcheng Liu, CFO (as Principal Financial Officer)
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-140007 on Form S-8 of our report dated February 26, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule ofGuidance Software, Inc. and subsidiaries (which report expresses an unqualified opinion), and the effectiveness of Guidance Software, Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-Kof Guidance Software, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2009. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Los Angeles, California 

February 26, 2010
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

________________________ DIVISION

_________________________________, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. __________________

)

_________________________________, )

)

Defendants, )

CONFLICT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

COMES NOW ___________________, a in the above-captioned

matter, and in accordance with the order of this Court, making the following disclosure

concerning parent companies, subsidiaries, partners, limited liability entity members and

managers, trustees (but not trust beneficiaries), affiliates, or similar entities reportable under

the provisions of the Middle District of Alabama’s General Order No. 3047:

This party is an individual, or

This party is a governmental entity, or

There are no entities to be reported, or

The following entities and their relationship to the party are hereby reported:

Reportable Entity Relationship to Party

________________________________ _________________________________

________________________________ _________________________________

________________________________ _________________________________

________________________________ _________________________________

 

Date (Signature)

 

(Counsel’s Name)

 

Counsel for (print names of all parties)

 

Address, City, State Zip Code

 

Telephone Number

Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 69 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

________________________ DIVISION

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I,____________________________________, do hereby Certify that a true and correct copy

of the foregoing has been furnished by ___________________________(manner of service,

i.e., U.S. Mail, electronic mail, etc.) on this _______day of ____________ 20__, to:

 

 

 

Date Signature

Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 69 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 2 of 2
§ 915.10 Handle. *Handle* means to sell, consign, deliver, or transport avocados within the production area or between the production area and any point outside thereof: *Provided,* That such term shall not include: ( a ) The sale or delivery of avocados to a handler, registered as such with the committee in accordance with such rules and regulations as it may prescribe with the approval of the Secretary, who has facilities within the production area for preparing avocados for market;
( b ) the delivery of avocados to such a handler solely for the purpose of having such avocados prepared for market; or
( c ) the transportation of avocados by a handler, so registered with the committee, from the grove to his packing facilities within the production area for the purpose of having such avocados prepared for market. In the event a grower sells his avocados to a handler who is not so registered with the committee, such grower shall be the first handler of such avocados.
[19 FR 3439, June 11, 1954, as amended at 20 FR 4177, June 15, 1955. Redesignated at 26 FR 12751, Dec. 30, 1961]
22.101-3 Reporting labor disputes.    (S-90) After becoming aware of labor disputes (actual or potential) involving a contractor, the contracting officer shall take prompt action consistent with the following instructions:       (1) Notify local legal counsel and the HCO by the most expeditious means. When possible, the HCO should be given an in-depth briefing regarding the actual or potential labor disputes by the contracting officer.       (2) Notify the affected customers by message or letter of the actual or potential labor disputes that could delay, or threaten to delay the timely contract performance.       (S-91) Legal counsel, ICW the HCO, will furnish all pertinent information relating to actual or potential labor disputes promptly to the HCA and the DISA Labor Advisor. The Labor Advisor for DISA is the Associate General Counsel, Personnel and Employment Law. **Parent topic:** SUBPART 22.1 –– BASIC LABOR POLICIES
#### § 97.142 For testing or increase.

An owner who contemplates filing an application and releases for testing or increase seed of the variety or propagating material or reproducible plant material of the variety may label such plant material or containers of the seed or plant material substantially as follows: “Unauthorized Propagation Prohibited—For Testing (or Increase) Only.”

[85 FR 432, Jan. 6, 2020]
252.204-7000 Disclosure of Information.

As prescribed in 204.404-70 (a), use the following clause:

DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION (OCT 2016)

(a) The Contractor shall not release to anyone outside the Contractor's organization any unclassified

information, regardless of medium (e.g., film, tape, document), pertaining to any part of this contract

or any program related to this contract, unless—

(1) The Contracting Officer has given prior written approval;

(2) The information is otherwise in the public domain before the date of release; or

(3) The information results from or arises during the performance of a project that involves no

covered defense information (as defined in the clause at DFARS 252.204-7012 ) and has been scoped

and negotiated by the contracting activity with the contractor and research performer and

determined in writing by the contracting officer to be fundamental research (which by definition

cannot involve any covered defense information), in accordance with National Security Decision

Directive 189, National Policy on the Transfer of Scientific, Technical and Engineering Information,

in effect on the date of contract award and the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and

Sustainment) memoranda on Fundamental Research, dated May 24, 2010, and on Contracted

Fundamental Research, dated June 26, 2008 (available at DFARS PGI 204.4 ).

(b) Requests for approval under paragraph (a)(1) shall identify the specific information to be

released, the medium to be used, and the purpose for the release. The Contractor shall submit its

request to the Contracting Officer at least 10 business days before the proposed date for release.

(c) The Contractor agrees to include a similar requirement, including this paragraph (c), in each

subcontract under this contract. Subcontractors shall submit requests for authorization to release

through the prime contractor to the Contracting Officer.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 252.204 RESERVED
Case 2:06-mj-00075-DRB Document 13 Filed 08/03/2006 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.7


In connection with a review of director compensation in November 2017, the Board of Directors of the Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation approved the following level of director compensation in the form of cash retainer and targeted value of equity, effective January 1, 2018:


		
	•
	The base annual cash retainer payable to all directors was increased by $3,600 from $58,400 to $62,000. 


		
	•
	The value of the equity award grant to all directors remained unchanged at $50,000.


		
	•
	The incremental annual cash retainer payable to:


		
	o
	the Chairman of the Board remained unchanged at $40,000, with his total annual cash retainer increasing to $102,000 from $98,400;


		
	o
	the Vice Chairman of the Board remained unchanged at $20,000, with his total annual cash retainer increasing to $82,000 from $78,400;


		
	•
	The incremental annual cash retainer payable to Committee chairs is set forth below, provided that no director shall receive the supplemental retainer for being the Chair of one of these four designated Committees if that director is already receiving the supplemental annual retainer applicable to the Chairman of the Board or the Vice Chairman of the Board:


		
	o
	the Chairman of the Audit Committee remained unchanged at $12,000, with his total annual cash retainer increasing to $74,000 from $70,400;


		
	o
	the Chairman of the Compensation Committee remained unchanged at $10,000, with his total annual cash retainer increasing to $72,000 from $68,400;


		
	o
	the Chairman of the Corporate Governance Committee remained unchanged at $12,000 (the Chairman of the Corporate Governance Committee currently serves as the Vice Chairman of the Board); and 


		
	o
	the Chairman of the Risk Committee remained unchanged at $10,000, with his total annual cash retainer increasing to $72,000.
§ 9.309 Miscellaneous provisions. ( a ) If a PARP payment resulted from erroneous information provided by a producer, or any person acting on their behalf, the payment will be recalculated and the producer must refund any excess payment with interest calculated from the date of the disbursement of the payment.
( b ) If FSA determines that the producer intentionally misrepresented information provided on their application, the application will be disapproved and the producer must refund the full payment to FSA with interest from the date of disbursement.
( c ) Any required refunds must be resolved in accordance with part 3 of this title.
( d ) The regulations in 7 CFR part 718, subpart D, and 7 CFR parts 11 and 780 apply to determinations made under this subpart.
( e ) A producer, whether a person or legal entity that either fails to timely provide all required documentation or fails to satisfy any eligibility requirement for PARP, is not eligible to receive PARP payments, directly or indirectly. A PARP payment to an eligible legal entity applicant whose member(s) either fails to timely provide all required documentation or fails to satisfy any eligibility requirement for PARP will be reduced proportionate to that member's ownership interest in the legal entity.
( f ) Any payment under this subpart will be made without regard to questions of title under State law and without regard to any claim or lien against the commodity or proceeds from the sale of the commodity. The regulations governing offsets in part 3 of this title do not apply to payments made under this subpart.
( g ) For the purposes of the effect of a lien on eligibility for Federal programs (28 U.S.C. 3201(e)), USDA waives the restriction on receipt of funds under PARP but only as to beneficiaries who, as a condition of the waiver, agree to apply the PARP payments to reduce the amount of the judgment lien.
( h ) The provisions in 7 CFR 718.3, 718.4, 718.5, 718.6, 718.8, 718.9, 718.10, and 718.11 are applicable to multiple programs and apply to PARP.
( i ) In addition to any other Federal laws that apply to PARP, the following laws apply: 15 U.S.C. 714; 18 U.S.C. 286, 287, 371, and 1001.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

MAXIE McNABB, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv664-MHT

) 

SANDERS LEAD COMPANY, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that plaintiff Maxie McNabb’s motion

for reconsideration (doc. no. 14) is set for

on-the-record oral argument on June 12, 2007, at 9:00

a.m. Counsel for plaintiff McNabb is to arrange for the

argument to be conducted by telephone.

It is further ORDERED that defendant Sanders Lead

Company, Inc. is to file a response to the motion by June

11, 2007.

DONE, this the 7th day of June, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00664-MHT-SRW Document 15 Filed 06/07/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### § 956.5 Walla Walla Sweet Onions.

*Walla Walla Sweet Onions* means all varieties of *Allium cepa* grown within the production area, except Spanish hybrid varieties. The committee may, with the approval of the Secretary, exempt individual varieties from any or all regulations issued under this part.
470.000 Scope of part.

This part sets forth the policies, procedures and requirements governing the procurement of

agricultural commodities by the Department of Agriculture for use:

(a) Under any domestic feeding and assistance program administered by the Food and Nutrition

Service; and

(b) Under Title II of the Food for Peace Act (7 U.S.C. 1721 et seq.); the Food for Progress Act of

1985; the McGovern-Dole International Food for Education and Child Nutrition Program; and any

other international food assistance program.

Parent topic: PART 470 - COMMODITY ACQUISITIONS
Last updated on 7/23/2014

• All • Uncheck All • • Alabama • Alaska • Arizona • Arkansas • California • Colorado • Connecticut • District of Columbia • Delaware • Florida • Georgia • Hawaii • Idaho • Illinois • Indiana • Iowa • Kansas http://java.epa.gov/oppt_chemical_search/ 

## Pollution Prevention and Toxics **Highlights** April 9, 2014 – EPA has released 138 declassified documents under its Voluntary Declassification Challenge Program. Learn more.

You will need Adobe Reader to view some of the files on this page. See EPA's PDF page to learn more. 

# Chemical Data Access Tool (CDAT) Use this page to find a range of chemical-specific information submitted to EPA under the Toxic Substances Control Act. This information is part of EPA’s ongoing effort to increase the public’s access to chemical information held by the Agency and is intended for individuals learning more about chemicals that are manufactured or imported into the United States. Read more. EPA’s newly developed database, ChemView, provides access to chemical information that the Agency receives and develops on chemicals. For more information, Go to ChemView. Directions for Accessing Information: 1. Click on the tabs below to review what you will find in each database, e.g., the CDR tab contains the 2012 Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) information. 2. In the search box, type in a chemical name, CAS number, company name, or document number. 3. You can also click on the Advanced Options link which will allow you to do a more targeted search. Note: The chemical names are listed by their preferred Chemical Abstract Index names on the Substance Registry Service (SRS) and not by their synonyms. 4. Then select the tab that includes the information of interest to you. If the information is available in that particular tab, the results will be displayed. Search Advanced Options • CDR • eDoc • TSCATS • HPVIS • Declass • VDCP • HC **CDR** - This tab contains the 2012 Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) information on the production and use of chemicals manufactured or imported into the United States. Download the entire non-confidential CDR database (updated June 2014) . US Environmental 

# Page 1of 2 Chemical Data Access Tool (CDAT) | US Environmental Protection Agency

12/1/2014 file:///C:/Program%20Files%20(x86)/Documentum/CTS/docbases/ProDocbase/config/temp_sessions/161835997...• Kentucky • Louisiana • Maine • Maryland • Massachusetts • Michigan • Minnesota • Mississippi • Missouri • Montana • Nebraska • Nevada • New Hampshire • New Jersey • New Mexico • New York • North Carolina • North Dakota • Ohio • Oklahoma • Oregon • Pennsylvania • Rhode Island • South Carolina • South Dakota • Tennessee • Texas • Utah • Vermont • Virginia • Washington • West Virginia • Wisconsin • Wyoming 

# Page 2of 2 Chemical Data Access Tool (CDAT) | US Environmental Protection Agency

12/1/2014 file:///C:/Program%20Files%20(x86)/Documentum/CTS/docbases/ProDocbase/config/temp_sessions/161835997...
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3309 

To suspend temporarily the duty on digital zoom camera lenses. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 26, 2006 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mrs. CLINTON) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on digital zoom camera 

lenses. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DIGITAL ZOOM CAMERA LENSES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.11.03 Lenses for digital cameras with focal 

length between 17 mm and 55 mm inclusive, not exceeding 27 oz. in weight (provided for in subheading 9002.11.90) ....... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 3309 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
In the motion, Petitioner asserts that his request for counsel is primarily made for purposes of 1

providing him with “effective utilization of discovery procedures.” (Doc. No. 22 at 11.) Petitioner is

advised that a habeas petitioner is not entitled to discovery as a matter of ordinary course. See Bracy v.

Gramley, 520 U.S. 899, 904 (1997). 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

 ______________________________

HOWARD GLENN TOOLE, *

#C 917683

Petitioner, *

 v. * 1:06-CV-696-MHT

 (WO) 

JAMES MCDONOUGH, et al., * 

Respondents. *

 ______________________________

ORDER ON MOTION

Upon consideration of Petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel filed on January

25, 2007, and as the court finds no circumstances warranting such action at this time, it is

ORDERED that this motion (Doc. No. 32) be and is hereby DENIED. See 1

McFarland v. Scott, 512 U.S. 849, 857 n. 3 (1994) (a petitioner serving a noncapital

sentence has no right to appointment of counsel in a habeas proceeding). 

To the extent Petitioner’s January 25 pleading contains a request for an order directing

correctional officials at his present place of incarceration to provide him with a certain

minimum amount of time in the prison law library, it is 

ORDERED that the motion for court order (Doc. No. 32) be and is hereby DENIED.

Upon consideration of Petitioner’s January 25 pleading, also construed as a motion

to compel Respondents to provide him with copies of Alabama case law and legal references

Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 33 Filed 01/29/2007 Page 1 of 2
as contained in their responsive pleadings and any future pleadings, and for good cause, it

is 

ORDERED that the motion (Doc. No. 32) be and is hereby DENIED. Petitioner may

contact the appropriate correctional official concerning his request for legal material. 

Done, this 29 day of January 2007. th

 /s/Terry Moorer 

TERRY MOORER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 33 Filed 01/29/2007 Page 2 of 2