alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Part 5629 - TAXES

Subpart 5629.4 - CONTRACT CLAUSES

5629.401 Domestic Contracts

5629.401-6 Gross Receipts and Compensating Tax

5629.401-6-90 Procedures for authorizing the use of FAR 52.22910, State of New Mexico Gross

Receipts and Compensating Tax

Subpart 5629.4 - CONTRACT CLAUSES

5629.401 Domestic Contracts

5629.401-6 Gross Receipts and Compensating Tax

5629.401-6-90 Procedures for authorizing the use of FAR 52.22910, State of New Mexico Gross Receipts and

Compensating Tax

(Revised May 2016)

United States Special Operations Command completed the NM-SOCOM Tax Agreement required by

FAR 29.401-4(b) , effective December 12, 2002. However, until such time as the agency is added to

the list published in FAR, contracting officers must receive approval prior to including the clause in

any cost-reimbursement contract performed in the State of . Contracting officers must follow the

procedures at 5601.304(4)(b)(1) used to authorize one-time use clauses, until United States Special

Operations Command’s name is added to FAR 29.401-4(c)(1) .

HQ, United States Special Operations Command

Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L)

SOFARS 5629

February 2007
**Docket Number FAA -**  **2012 -**  **0725**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S MARCH 31, 1997, FORM 10-Q AND THRIFT FINANCIAL REPORT IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          43,019
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                10,569
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    263,132
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        872,724
<ALLOWANCE>                                     10,748
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,248,033
<DEPOSITS>                                     880,281
<SHORT-TERM>                                   138,106
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             15,536
<LONG-TERM>                                    122,449
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,758
<OTHER-SE>                                      83,903
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,248,033
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 38,378
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                8,599
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                46,977
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              18,475
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,325
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           21,654
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,210
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 118
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 16,484
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,543
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       6,368
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,368
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .82
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.55
<LOANS-NON>                                      5,763
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    88
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                11,151
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    2,168
<RECOVERIES>                                       555
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               10,748
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             9,377
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,371
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:06-cv-00694-MHT-VPM Document 1 Filed 08/07/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:06-cv-00694-MHT-VPM Document 1 Filed 08/07/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:06-cv-00694-MHT-VPM Document 1 Filed 08/07/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:06-cv-00694-MHT-VPM Document 1 Filed 08/07/2006 Page 4 of 4
Case 1:06-cv-00694-MHT-VPM Document 1-2 Filed 08/07/2006 Page 1 of 17
Case 1:06-cv-00694-MHT-VPM Document 1-2 Filed 08/07/2006 Page 2 of 17
Case 1:06-cv-00694-MHT-VPM Document 1-2 Filed 08/07/2006 Page 3 of 17
Case 1:06-cv-00694-MHT-VPM Document 1-2 Filed 08/07/2006 Page 4 of 17
Case 1:06-cv-00694-MHT-VPM Document 1-2 Filed 08/07/2006 Page 5 of 17
Case 1:06-cv-00694-MHT-VPM Document 1-2 Filed 08/07/2006 Page 6 of 17
Case 1:06-cv-00694-MHT-VPM Document 1-2 Filed 08/07/2006 Page 7 of 17
Case 1:06-cv-00694-MHT-VPM Document 1-2 Filed 08/07/2006 Page 8 of 17
Case 1:06-cv-00694-MHT-VPM Document 1-2 Filed 08/07/2006 Page 9 of 17
Case 1:06-cv-00694-MHT-VPM Document 1-2 Filed 08/07/2006 Page 10 of 17
Case 1:06-cv-00694-MHT-VPM Document 1-2 Filed 08/07/2006 Page 11 of 17
Case 1:06-cv-00694-MHT-VPM Document 1-2 Filed 08/07/2006 Page 12 of 17
Case 1:06-cv-00694-MHT-VPM Document 1-2 Filed 08/07/2006 Page 13 of 17
Case 1:06-cv-00694-MHT-VPM Document 1-2 Filed 08/07/2006 Page 14 of 17
Case 1:06-cv-00694-MHT-VPM Document 1-2 Filed 08/07/2006 Page 15 of 17
Case 1:06-cv-00694-MHT-VPM Document 1-2 Filed 08/07/2006 Page 16 of 17
Case 1:06-cv-00694-MHT-VPM Document 1-2 Filed 08/07/2006 Page 17 of 17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

March 1, 2007

NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE

To: ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD

Case Style: Bowden v. Mission Petroleum Carriers et al 

Case Number: 2:06-cv-00665-WHA

Referenced Pleading: Notice of filing Defendants' Expert Disclosures

Docket Entry Number: 20

The referenced pleading was electronically filed on ***February 28, 2007*** in this case and

is not in compliance with the local rules and/or administrative procedures of this court. 

******This pleading is discovery and is not allowed pursuant to Local Rule 5.1 NON-FILING

OF CIVIL DISCOVERY.

The pleading is hereby STRICKEN from the record and the parties are instructed to disregard

the entry of this pleading on the court’s docket. Parties should be aware that the striking of

this entry does not affect their responsibilities as to the discovery process.

Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 21 Filed 03/01/2007 Page 1 of 1
CHIEF JUSTICE

ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

GINA M. BENAVIDES

GREGORY T. PERKES

NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

DORIAN E. RAMIREZ NUECES COUNTY COURTH OUSE 901 LEOPARD, 10TH FL OOR

CORPUS C HRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361

- 888

- 0416 (TEL)

361

- 888

- 0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG. 100 E. CANO, 5TH FLO OR EDINBURG, TEXAS 7853 9

956

- 318

- 2405 (TEL)

956

- 318

- 2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa 

# Court of Appeals

Thirteenth District of Texas

January 27, 2015

Hon. Aurora De La Garza

District Clerk Cameron County Courthouse

974 E. Harrison
Brownsville, TX 78520

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13

- 14

- 00536

- CV

Tr.Ct.No. 2012

- DCL

- 7930

- I Style: Joey Eddeek d/b/a Joe's Quick Stop #2 v. W right Fuel Distributors, LLC

The judgment of the trial court in the above cause was DISMISSED

- WANT OF

JURISDICTION by this Court on the 11/13/2014. The mandate is enclosed.

Costs of the appeal were adjudged against appellant, Joey Eddee k d/b/a Joe's Quick Stop #2.

Pursuant to Section 51.204(b) of the Government Code, the attorneys of record are hereby notified that any exhibits submitted to the Court by a party may be withdrawn by that party or the party’s attorney of record within 30 days. Exhibits on file with the Court will be destroyed three (3) years after final disposition of the case or at an earlier date if ordered by the

Court.



### Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER: ch

Enc.

cc: Hon. J. Joseph Vale Jr. (DELIVERED VI A E

- MAIL) Hon. Noe Robles (DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL)
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 29 Filed 03/16/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 29 Filed 03/16/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 29 Filed 03/16/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 29 Filed 03/16/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 29 Filed 03/16/2007 Page 5 of 5
709.507-2 Contract clause.

(a)–(b) [Reserved]

(c) In order to avoid problems from organizational conflicts of interest that may be discovered after

award of a contract, the clause found at 752.209–71 shall be inserted in all contracts whenever the

solicitation or resulting contract or both include a provision in accordance with (48 CFR) FAR

9.507–1, or a clause in accordance with (48 CFR) FAR 9.507–2, establishing a restraint on the

contractor's eligibility for future contracts.

Parent topic: Subpart 709.5—Organizational Conflicts of Interest
Case 2:06-cv-00662-MEF-CSC Document 3 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00662-MEF-CSC Document 3 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 2 of 2
§ 701.211 Prohibition on duplicate payments. ( a ) Participants are not eligible to receive funding under EFRP for land on which FSA determines that the participant has or will receive federal funding for the same or similar expenses under: ( 1 ) The Emergency Conservation Program provided for in subpart B of this part;
( 2 ) The Wetland Reserve Program (WRP) provided for in part 1467 of this title;
( 3 ) The Emergency Wetland Reserve Program (EWRP) provided for in part 623 of this chapter;
( 4 ) The Emergency Watershed Protection Program (EWP), provided for in part 624 of this chapter; or
( 5 ) Any other Federal program that covers the same or similar expenses so as to create duplicate payments, or, have the effect of creating in total, otherwise, a higher rate of financial assistance than is allowed on its own under this part.
( b ) Participants who receive any duplicate Federal funds, payments, or benefits must refund any EFRP payments received, except the Deputy Administrator may reduce the refund amount to the amount determined appropriate by the Deputy Administrator to ensure that the total amount of assistance received by the owner of the land under all Federal programs does not exceed an amount otherwise allowed in this part.
[75 FR 70889, Nov. 17, 2010, as amended at 88 FR 39768, June 20, 2023]
Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 12 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 1 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 12 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 2 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 12 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 3 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 12 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 4 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 12 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 5 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 12 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 6 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 12 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 7 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 12 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 8 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 12 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 9 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 12 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 10 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 12 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 11 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 12 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 12 of 12
#### § 917.101 Marketing agreement.

*Marketing agreement* means Marketing Agreement No. 85 as amended.

###### Effective Date Note

#### Effective Date Note:

At 76 FR 66605, Oct. 27, 2011, § 917.101 was suspended indefinitely, effective Oct. 28, 2011.
#### In the Matter of Franchise Realty Interstate Corporation, Respondent, v Peter F. Cohalan et al., Constituting the Town Board of the Town of Islip, Appellants. 

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Town Board of the Town of Islip denying petitioner’s application for a special permit for a fast food restaurant, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered May 8, 1979, which, upon granting the petition, directed the town board to issue the special permit. Judgment reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, and proceeding dismissed on the merits. On this record, the town board was warranted in concluding that the proposed use would aggravate the existing congestion on Sunrise Highway, which is a divided highway, and create traffic problems because of the necessity for turning movements at neighboring intersections. Accordingly, reversal is required. Hopkins, J. P., Lazer, Gibbons and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
```

[107th Congress Public Law 323]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ323.107]

[[Page 116 STAT. 2787]]

Public Law 107-323
107th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To require the display of the POW/MIA flag at the World War II Memorial, 
       the Korean War Veterans Memorial, and the Vietnam Veterans 
             Memorial. <<NOTE: Dec. 4, 2002 -  [S. 1226]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: POW/MIA Memorial 
Flag Act of 2002.>> 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. <<NOTE: 36 USC 101 note.>> 

    This Act may be cited as the ``POW/MIA Memorial Flag Act of 2002''.
SEC. 2. DISPLAY OF POW/MIA FLAG AT WORLD WAR II MEMORIAL, KOREAN 
                    WAR MEMORIAL, AND VIETNAM VETERANS MEMORIAL.

    (a) Requirement for Display.--Subsection (d)(3) of section 902 of 
title 36, United States Code, is amended by striking ``The Korean War 
Veterans Memorial and the Vietnam Veterans Memorial'' and inserting 
``The World War II Memorial, the Korean War Veterans Memorial, and the 
Vietnam Veterans Memorial''.
    (b) Days for Display.--Subsection (c)(2) of that section is 
amended--
            (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and (B) as 
        subparagraphs (B) and (C), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting before subparagraph (B), as so 
        redesignated, the following new subparagraph (A):
            ``(A) in the case of display at the World War II Memorial, 
        Korean War Veterans Memorial, and Vietnam Veterans Memorial 
        (required by subsection (d)(3) of this section), any day on 
        which the United States flag is displayed;''.

[[Page 116 STAT. 2788]]

    (c) Display <<NOTE: 36 USC 902 note.>>  on Existing Flagpole.--No 
element of the United States Government may construe the amendments made 
by this section as requiring the acquisition of erection of a new or 
additional flagpole for purposes of the display of the POW/MIA flag.

    Approved December 4, 2002.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 1226:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 148 (2002):
            Oct. 2, considered and passed Senate.
            Nov. 14, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1666

ANDI PALGUNADI,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A72-167-696)

Submitted: January 31, 2007 Decided: February 12, 2007

 

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arnedo S. Valera, LAW OFFICES OF VALERA & ASSOCIATES, Fairfax,

Virginia, for Petitioner. Rod J. Rosenstein, Allen F. Loucks,

Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Andi Palgunadi, a native and citizen of Indonesia,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals adopting and affirming the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) order

denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and

protection under the Convention Against Torture. Palgunadi

contends that he established eligibility for asylum. As the IJ

concluded that the asylum application was untimely and no

exceptions applied, we find that consideration of his asylum claim

is barred. See 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(3) (2000).

Palgunadi also challenges the finding that he failed to

qualify for withholding of removal. “To qualify for withholding of

removal, a petitioner must show that he faces a clear probability

of persecution because of his race, religion, nationality,

membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.”

Rusu v. INS, 296 F.3d 316, 324 n.13 (4th Cir. 2002) (citing INS v.

Stevic, 467 U.S. 407, 430 (1984)). Having conducted our review, we

conclude that substantial evidence supports the finding that

Palgunadi did not establish eligibility for withholding of removal.

We accordingly deny the petition for review. We deny

Palgunadi’s motion to remand and dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
United States Steel Corporation – Keetac

Response to U. S. EPA Section 114 Request

April 24, 2012

Item 15

Identify all NOX emission sources and factors contributing to NOX emissions at the

facility's indurating furnaces, including but not limited to, the burners.

Person(s): that provided information used or considered in responding to the question or

were consulted in the preparation of the response: Steve Londerville (Coen), Stephani 

Campbell

Answer: 

Please refer to Minntac response to Item 15 for this item as the response provided therein applies 

to both Keetac and Minntac. A report is provided that was written by Steve Londerville from 

Coen that addresses all of the questions in Item 15.
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Photogen Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Taffy J. Williams, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company

|/s/TAFFY J. WILLIAMSTaffy J. Williams, Ph.D.
Chief Executive Officer
November 19, 2002 |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---

QuickLinks
Case 2:06-cv-00690-MEF-SRW Document 6 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 1 of 1
52.237-5 Payment by Contractor to Government.       As prescribed in 37.304(b), insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts for dismantling, demolition, or removal of improvements whenever the contractor is to receive title to dismantled or demolished property and a net amount of compensation is due to the Government, except if the contracting officer determines that it would be advantageous to the Government for the contractor to pay in increments and the Government to transfer title to the contractor for increments of property only upon receipt of those payments:          Payment by Contractor to Government (Apr 1984)                                       (a) 						            The Contractor shall receive title to all property to be dismantled, demolished, or removed under this contract and not specifically designated in the Schedule as being retained by the Government. The title shall vest in the Contractor immediately upon the Government’s issuing the notice of award, or if a performance bond is to be furnished, upon the Government’s issuing a notice to proceed with the work. The Government shall not be responsible for the condition of, or any loss or damage to, the property.                                          (b) 						            The Contractor shall promptly remove from the site all property acquired by the Contractor. The Government shall not permit storage of property on the site beyond the completion date. If the Contractor does not wish to remove from the site any of the property acquired, the Contracting Officer may, upon written request, grant the Contractor permission to leave the property on the premises. As a condition of the granting of the permission, the Contractor agrees to waive any right, title, claim, or interest in and to the property.                                          (c) 						            The Contractor shall perform the work called for under this contract and within ________ days of receipt of notice of award, unless otherwise provided in the Schedule and before proceeding with the work, shall pay _________ [*fill in amount*]. Checks shall be made payable to the office designated in the contract and shall be forwarded to the Contracting Officer.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.237 [Reserved]
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

GEORGE PARKER, #140922, )

 )

 Plaintiff, )

 )

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06-CV-649-WHA

 )

GWENDOLYN GIVENS, et al., )

 )

 Defendants. )

O R D E R

Upon review of the document filed by the plaintiff on July 18, 2008 (Court Doc. No.

28), which the court construes as a motion for status, and for good cause, it is

ORDERED that this motion be and is hereby GRANTED. The plaintiff is advised

that this case is pending before the court on his complaint, the written report and supporting

evidentiary materials filed by the defendants, and his response in opposition to the

defendants’ report. The plaintiff is further advised that no additional pleadings are

necessary for disposition of the issues presented in the complaint and he will be advised of

any action taken by the court in this case. 

Done this 18th day of July, 2008.

 /s/ Wallace Capel, Jr. 

WALLACE CAPEL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00649-WHA-WC Document 29 Filed 07/18/2008 Page 1 of 1