alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-81,988-02

EX P ARTE THO MAS EDWARD BETTS , Appli cant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. F 05-58299-M IN THE 194T H DISTRICT COURT

F ROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleade d g uilty to possession with i n t ent to deliver a controlled substance, and orig inally rec eived five y ear s’ defe rre d adjudica t i o n community supervision. His g uilt was later adjudicate d and he was sentenc ed to imprisonment for fiftee n y ear s. On Fe bruar

y 11, 2014, an order desig nating issues was signe d by the trial court. The Dallas Cou n t y Di s t ri ct Clerk proper ly forwa rded the application to this Court afte r 180 day s had passed since the State rec eived service of the application. T E X . R. A P P . P. Rule 73.4(5). Neve rtheless, thereare issues which still need to be resolved. Specifica lly , althoug h it ap p ea rs that the State filed an

amende d moti o n to revoke Applicant’s community supervision on Aug ust 3, 2011, the habea s rec ord does not ref

lect whe ther a

capia s was issued for the arr est of Applicant befor e the f ive-y ear period of defe rre d adjudication had expired. Fur thermore , there has been no resolution of the question of whether Applicant rec eived eff ective assistance of counsel, as desig nated in the Fe bruar y 11, 2014, order desig nating issues. There fore , we rema nd this application to the 194th District Court of Dallas County to allow the trial judge to complete an evidentiar y investiga

tion and enter finding s of fac t and conclusions of law

. This application will be held in abey ance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The i s s u es shall be resolved within 90 day s of this order

. A supplemental transcr ipt containing all aff idavits and int err og atories or the t ransc ription of t he court repor ter’s notes from any hear ing or deposition, along with the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be for war ded to this Court within 120 day s of t he date of t his order. A ny extensions of ti me shall be obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: September

17, 2014 Do not publish
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for fiscal year ended March
      31,
      2008 of Nexgen Petroleum Corp., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual
      Report”), I, Hsien Loong Wong, President, CEO, CFO, Treasurer, Secretary and a
      director of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|1. | The
              Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or
              15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
              and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|2. | The
              information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
              of
              the Company.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated:
                July 14, 2008
            /s/ Hsien Loong WongHsien
                Loong Wong, President, CEO,
              CFO,
                Treasurer, Secreatry and Director
              (Principal
                Executive Officer)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Roy Tarbell, Appellant.

Submitted August 13, 2007;

decided September 6, 2007

Reported below, 38 AD3d 1368.

Motion for an extension of the time within which to apply for permission to appeal pursuant to CPL 460.20 granted and motion papers treated as a timely CPL 460.20 application.
Subpart 5245.1 - GENERAL

Parent topic: Part 5245 - GOVERNMENT PROPERTY

5245.102 Policy.

(4)(ii)(C)(1)(i) Submit the required D&Fs for approval to DASN(P) by email at

usn.pentagon.asstsecnavrdadc.mbx.pabt@us.navy.mil with the subject “[Activity Name] DFARS

245.102(4)(ii)(C)(1)(i) - Government-Furnished Property Identification Exception D&F.”

(2) Submit copies of D&Fs executed pursuant to DFARS 245.102(4)(ii)(C)(1) to DASN(P) by email at

usn.pentagon.asstsecnavrdadc.mbx.pabt@us.navy.mil with the subject “[Activity Name] DFARS

245.102- Government-Furnished Property Identification Exception D&F.”

5245.103-71 Transferring Government property accountability.

The contracting officer shall obtain approval of an authorized representative of the requiring activity

before transferring property between contracts.

5245.103-74 Contracting office responsibilities.

(S-90) When the use of FAR clause 52.245-1, Government Property, is required, the contracting

officer shall complete Annex 9, Government-Furnished Property Preaward Compliance Checklist

with the business clearance.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DEBRA BEYAH, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:06-CV-659

)

WAL-MART STORES, INC )

)

Defendant. )

NOTICE OF MEDIATION

COMES NOW, the Petitioner, by and through the undersigned counsel, and as a follow

up to the May 18, 2007, Joint Motion for Extension (Document #25), hereby notifies this

Honorable Court that Mediation has been scheduled for July 6, 2007.

Respectfully submitted on this the 5th day of July, 2007.

 /s/ Bobbie S. Crook 

BOBBIE S. CROOK (CRO-040)

Attorney for Plaintiff

367 South St. Andrews Street

Dothan, AL 36301

(334) 671-8062

(334) 677-2872

Email: bcrook100@aol.com

OF COUNSEL:

ANN C. ROBERTSON

TEMPLE D. TRUEBLOOD

Wiggins, Childs, Quinn and Pantazis

The Kress Building 

301 19th Avenue North

Birmingham, AL 35203

(205) 328-0640

Case 1:06-cv-00659-CSC Document 27 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this the 5th day of July, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing

to the following:

Charlotte McClusky

LITTLER MENDELSON

A Professional Corporation

3348 Peachtree Road, N.E.

Suite, 1100

Atlanta, Georgia 30326-1008

Scott A. Forman

LITTLER MENDELSON

A Professional Corporation

2 South Biscayne Blvd.

One Biscayne Tower, Ste. 1500

Miami, Florida 33131

 /s/ Bobbie S. Crook 

OF COUNSEL

Case 1:06-cv-00659-CSC Document 27 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00652-MHT-WC Document 5 Filed 07/24/2006 Page 1 of 11
Case 2:06-cv-00652-MHT-WC Document 5 Filed 07/24/2006 Page 2 of 11
Case 2:06-cv-00652-MHT-WC Document 5 Filed 07/24/2006 Page 3 of 11
Case 2:06-cv-00652-MHT-WC Document 5 Filed 07/24/2006 Page 4 of 11
Case 2:06-cv-00652-MHT-WC Document 5 Filed 07/24/2006 Page 5 of 11
Case 2:06-cv-00652-MHT-WC Document 5 Filed 07/24/2006 Page 6 of 11
Case 2:06-cv-00652-MHT-WC Document 5 Filed 07/24/2006 Page 7 of 11
Case 2:06-cv-00652-MHT-WC Document 5 Filed 07/24/2006 Page 8 of 11
Case 2:06-cv-00652-MHT-WC Document 5 Filed 07/24/2006 Page 9 of 11
Case 2:06-cv-00652-MHT-WC Document 5 Filed 07/24/2006 Page 10 of 11
Case 2:06-cv-00652-MHT-WC Document 5 Filed 07/24/2006 Page 11 of 11
#### § 906.15 Fiscal period.

*Fiscal period* means the period beginning August 1 and ending July 31 following; or such annual beginning and ending dates as may be approved by the Secretary pursuant to recommendations of the committee.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

vs. CASE NO.: 4:01-CR-28-SPM/GRJ

LYNDON B. BAKER,

Defendant.

___________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court for consideration of the Magistrate

Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 117). Defendant filed objections

(doc. 119). 

Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1) and despite

defendant’s objections, I find that the Report and Recommendation is correct

and should be adopted. Defendant has not sought or been granted leave by the

appellate court to file a second or successive motion to vacate. Therefore,

review is foreclosed at this time.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 117) is

adopted and incorporated by reference into this order.

2. The motion of Defendant Lyndon B. Baker to vacate, set aside, or

Case 4:01-cr-00028-RS-GRJ Document 120 Filed 01/26/12 Page 1 of 2
correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (doc. 116) is

denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 26th day of January, 2012.

S/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

2

Case 4:01-cr-00028-RS-GRJ Document 120 Filed 01/26/12 Page 2 of 2
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ROSS LAMAR WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:20cv5782/MCR/ZCB

B. SOWELL,

Defendant.

_____________________/

ORDER

The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on February 14, 

2023. ECF No. 58. The Court furnished the parties a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, 

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all 

timely filed objections. See ECF No. 59.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed 

objections thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be 

adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 58, is 

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

Case 3:20-cv-05782-MCR-ZCB Document 60 Filed 03/17/23 Page 1 of 2
2

2. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 43, is

GRANTED.

3. Defendant’s motion to dismiss ECF No. 29, is DENIED as moot.

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendant 

and close this case.

DONE AND ORDERED this17th day of March 2023.

M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-05782-MCR-ZCB Document 60 Filed 03/17/23 Page 2 of 2
All - we have concluded our review under E0s 12866 and 13563.

From : Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov [ mailto:Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov ] Sent : Friday, December 14, 2012 12:02 PM To : Frey, Nathan J.; Mancini, Dominic J. Cc : McCarthy.Gina@epamail.epa.gov <McCarthy.Gina@epamail.epa.gov>; McCabe.Janet@epamail.epa.gov <McCabe.Janet@epamail.epa.gov>; Weatherhead.Darryl@epamail.epa.gov <Weatherhead.Darryl@epamail.epa.gov>; Bradley.Lillian@epamail.epa.go v <Bradley.Lillian@epamail.epa.gov>; Dougherty.Joseph J@epamail.epa.gov <Dougherty.Joseph - J@epamail.epa.gov>; Owens.Nicole@epamail.epa.gov <Owens.Nicole@epamail.epa.gov>; Rees.Sarah@epamail.epa.gov <Rees.Sarah@epamail.epa.gov> Subject : PM RIA Chapters -- clean versions Nathan and Dom, Here are the clean versions of the RIA chapters. I hope these all get through to you. Lydia (See attached file: Chapter 10 -- Employment Impacts.1121412.docx)(See attached file: Chapter 00 - ExecSummary_12_14_12.docx )(See attached file: Chapter 1_Introduction_12 - 13 - 12.docx)(See attached file: Chapter 2 -- Defining the Problem_12.13.12_clean.docx)(See attached file: Chapter 3 --

Air Quality Modeling and Analysis_12.14.12.docx)(See attached file: Chapter 4 -

- Appendix 4A Cont rol Strategies Addtl Info.12.12.12.docx)(See attached file: Chapter 4 -- Control Strategies.12.12.12.docx)(See attached file: Chapter 5 -- Appendix 5A Additional Sensitivity Analyses 12.13.12.docx)(See attached file: Chapter 5 -- Appendix 5B Qualitative Assessme nt of Uncertainty in Benefits 12.13.12.docx)(See attached file: Chapter 5 -- Human Health Benefits Analysis Chapter 12.13.12.docx)(See attached file: Chapter 6 -- Appendix 6A Visibility details for PM Appendix 12.13.12.docx)(See attached file: Chapter 6 -- Appen dix 6B Illustrative Visibility co - benefits 12.13.12.docx)(See attached file: Chapter 6 -- Welfare Co - Benefits Chapter for PM NAAQS RIA 12.13.12.docx)(See attached file: Chapter 7 -- Engineering Costs 12_14_12.docx)(See attached file: Chapter 7 -- Engineering Cos ts Appendix_Hybrid Discussion 12_14_12.docx)(See attached file: Chapter 8_Comparison of Benefits and Costs_12 - 14 - 12.docx)(See attached file: Chapter 09 -- Statutory and Executive Order Reviews_121412.docx)
#### § 930.91 Amendments.

Amendments to this subpart may be proposed, from time to time, by the Board or by the Secretary.
#### § 932.61 Records.

Each handler shall maintain such records of olives acquired, held, and disposed of by such handler as may be prescribed by the committee and needed by it to perform its functions under this subpart. Such records shall be retained for at least two years beyond the crop year in which the transaction occurred. The committee, with the approval of the Secretary, may prescribe rules and regulations to include under this section handler records that detail advertising and promotion activities which the committee may need to perform its functions under § 932.45(a).

[47 FR 51094, Nov. 12, 1982]
PART 48 – VALUE ENGINEERING       SUBPART 48.1 – POLICIES AND PROCEDURES                                                         48.101 General.    SUBPART 48.1 – POLICIES AND PROCEDURES     48.101 General.    (S-90) When a contracting officer receives a Value Engineering Change Proposal (VECP) from the contractor, the contracting officer / acquisition team shall:       (1) Acknowledge receipt within 5 business days.       (2) Provide a copy to the Program Management Office (PMO) and copy the DISA VE Senior Management Official in the DISA Office of the Component Acquisition Executive; the evaluation shall convene within 10 business days and the KO shall be notified of the acceptance or rejection within 15 business days.       (3) If additional information is needed, the PMO will notify the contractor, and copy the Contracting Officer and VE Senior Management Official. If negotiation of the VE is required, the KO shall lead the negotiations.       (4) If accepted, the KO shall execute a bilateral modification to the contract citing the VE clause in the contract as the authority for the modification.       (5) If VECP is not accepted, the KO will notify the Contractor in writing, with an explanation of why the VECP was not accepted. The KO will copy the PMO and the VE Senior Management Official.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 2:06mj72-DRB

 )

JOSHUA WAYNE HESTER )

GOVERNMENT'S MOTION FOR DETENTION HEARING

Comes now the United States of America, by and through Leura

G. Canary, United States Attorney for the Middle District of

Alabama, and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3142(e) and (f) moves for a

detention hearing for the above-captioned defendant.

1. Eligibility of Cases

This case is eligible for a detention order because this case

involves:

 X Crime of violence (18 U.S.C. 3156)

Maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death

10 + year drug offense

 Felony, with two prior convictions in the above categories

Serious risk the defendant will flee

 Serious risk of obstruction of justice

2. Reason For Detention

The Court should detain defendant because there are no

conditions of release which will reasonably assure:

 Defendant's appearance as required

 X Safety of any other person and the community

Case 2:06-mj-00072-DRB Document 3 Filed 08/01/2006 Page 1 of 3
3. Rebuttable Presumption

The United States will invoke the rebuttable presumption

against defendant under Section 3142(e). The presumption applies

because:

X Probable cause to believe defendant committed 10 + year

offense involving a minor under 18 U.S.C. 2251

Previous conviction for "eligible" offense committed while

on pretrial bond

A period of five years has not elapsed from defendant's

conviction or release from imprisonment for the offense

described above

4. Time For Detention Hearing

The United States requests the Court conduct the detention

hearing:

 X At the initial appearance

After continuance of 3 days

The Government requests leave of Court to file a supplemental

motion with additional grounds or presumption for detention should

this be necessary.

Case 2:06-mj-00072-DRB Document 3 Filed 08/01/2006 Page 2 of 3
Respectfully submitted this the 1st day of August, 2006.

LEURA G. CANARY 

United States Attorney

/s/K. David Cooke, Jr.

K. DAVID COOKE, JR.

Assistant United States Attorney

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334)223-7280

Fax: (334)223-7135

E-mail: david.cooke@usdoj.gov

Case 2:06-mj-00072-DRB Document 3 Filed 08/01/2006 Page 3 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

WILLIAM HAZEL, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-678-WKW

)

MERCK & CO., INC., )

)

Defendant. )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the defendant’s Motion to Stay All Proceedings pending Transfer

Decision by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (Doc. #4) filed on August 24, 2006, it is

hereby 

ORDERED that the plaintiff file a response to this motion, on or before September 14, 2006,

as to why this motion should not be granted.

The parties are advised that they are required to submit a paper courtesy copy of briefs

and supporting evidence to the Chambers of the undersigned.

DONE this the 25th day of August, 2006.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00678-WKW-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### Elijah H. Purdy et al., Respondents, *v.*Edwin J. Dunning, Jr., Appellant.

(Argued June 17, 1884;

decided June 24 1884)

*Isaac P. Martin, Jr., for*appellant.

*Adrian 3. Joline*for respondent.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Order affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

JIMMY CASSADY, as )

Administratrix of the Estate of )

ORBIE CASSADY, deceased, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv679-LES

)

PACTIV CORPORATION, et al, )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

Now pending before the court is the defendants’ motion for an enlargement of time

to respond to the complaint (doc. # 6). The plaintiffs do not object to the motion.

Accordingly, upon consideration of the motion and for good cause, it is 

ORDERED that the motion for an enlargement of time to respond to the complaint

(doc. # 6) be and is hereby GRANTED and the defendants’ time for responding to the

complaint be and is hereby EXTENDED to September 25, 2006.

Done this 18 day of August, 2006. th

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00679-LES-CSC Document 7 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 1 of 1
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

§ 800.171 Who may be licensed or authorized. ( a ) *Prohibitions.* No person may be licensed or authorized who has a conflict of interest as defined in section 11 of the Act or specified in § 800.187.
( b ) *Exceptions to prohibitions* — ( 1 ) *Conflict by agency.* An employee of an agency that has a conflict of interest that is waived by the Administrator under section 11(b)(5) of the Act may be licensed: *Provided,* That the employee has no conflict of interest other than the agency conflict of interest.
( 2 ) *Warehouse samplers.* A qualified employee of an elevator may be licensed to perform specified sampling services under the Act in accordance with the provisions of § 800.174(a)(2).
( c ) *General qualifications* — ( 1 ) *Inspection and weighing.* To obtain a license to perform inspection or weighing services under the Act, an individual must be employed by an agency to perform the services and must otherwise be found competent in accordance with this section and § 800.173.
( 2 ) *Specified technical services.* To obtain a license to perform specified sampling, inspection testing, weighing, and similar services under the Act, an individual must ( i ) be employed by an agency to perform the services, or
( ii ) enter into or be employed under a contract with the Service to perform the services, and
( iii ) otherwise be found competent in accordance with this section and § 800.173.
( 3 ) *Warehouse sampler.* To obtain a warehouse sampler's license, an applicant must be employed by an elevator to perform sampling services and otherwise be found competent in accordance with this section and § 800.173.
( 4 ) *Requirements.* To be considered competent, an individual must ( i ) meet the qualifications specified in § 800.173; and
( ii ) have available the equipment and facilities necessary to perform the services for which the individual is to be licensed.
( d ) *Competency determinations* — ( 1 ) *Agency samplers and technicians.* The competency of an applicant for a license as a sampler, inspection technician, or weighing technician shall be determined by ( i ) the chief inspector or the chief weighmaster, as applicable, of the agency that employs the applicant or, in the case of a warehouse sampler, the agency that is assigned the area in which the elevator that employs the sampler is located, and
( ii ) the field office supervisor.
( 2 ) *Inspectors, weighers, contract samplers, and technicians.* The competency of an applicant for a license as an inspector or weigher or any license issued under the terms of a contract with the Service shall be determined by the Service.
( 3 ) *Examinations.* A determination of competency of an applicant for a license shall include an evaluation of the results of examinations or reexaminations under § 800.173.
[45 FR 15810, Mar. 11, 1980, as amended at 49 FR 36072, Sept. 14, 1984]
47.303-3 F.o.b. origin, freight allowed.

(a) Explanation of delivery term."F.o.b. origin, freight allowed" means-

(1) Free of expense to the Government delivered-

(i) On board the indicated type or conveyance of the carrier (or of the Government, if specified) at a

designated point in the city, county, and State from which the shipments will be made and from

which line-haul transportation service (as distinguished from switching, local drayage, or other

terminal service) will begin;

(ii) To, and placed on, the carrier’s wharf (at shipside, within reach of the ship’s loading tackle, when

the shipping point is within a port area having water transportation service) or the carrier’s freight

station;

(iii) To a U.S. Postal Service facility; or

(iv) If stated in the solicitation, to any Government-designated point located within the same city or

commercial zone as the f.o.b. origin point specified in the contract (the Federal Motor Carrier Safety

Administration prescribes commercial zones at Subpart B of 49 CFR part 372); and

(2) An allowance for freight, based on applicable published tariff rates (or Government rate tenders)

between the points specified in the contract, is deducted from the contract price.

(b) Contractor responsibilities. The contractor’s responsibilities are the same as those listed in

47.303-1(b).

(c) Contract clause. The contracting officer shall insert in solicitations and contracts the clause at

52.247-31, F.o.b. Origin, Freight Allowed, when the delivery term is f.o.b. origin, freight allowed.

Parent topic: 47.303 Standard delivery terms and contract clauses.