alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3098 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3098

   To suspend temporarily the duty on seals, rear spar, wing center 
                                section.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

 Mr. Brownback introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on seals, rear spar, wing center 
                                section.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SEALS, REAR SPAR, WING CENTER SECTION.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.59.11        Seals, rear spar, wing  Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           center section                                                    31/2009          ''
                           (provided for in                                                                    .
                           subheading
                           5911.90.00)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3018 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3018

      To suspend temporarily the duty on Phosphor-SCA, strontium 
                   halophosphate doped with europium.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 24, 2006

Mr. Reid (for Mr. Rockefeller) introduced the following bill; which was 
          read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To suspend temporarily the duty on Phosphor-SCA, strontium 
                   halophosphate doped with europium.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PHOSPHOR-SCA, STRONTIUM HALOPHOSPHATE DOPED WITH EUROPIUM.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of Chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.32.08      Phosphor-SCA,       Free         No Change        No Change        On or Before 12/  ''.
                         strontium                                                          31/2009
                         halophosphate
                         doped with
                         europium;
                         inorganic
                         products of a
                         kind used as
                         luminophores (CAS
                         Nos. 109037-74-3
                         and 1312-81-8)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         3206.50.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-10577 

Summary Calendar

__________________

RICHARD BRENTON TOBIAS,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

E. YOUNG, Judge; TIM CURRY; TARRANT CITY JAIL,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:93CV00049

- - - - - - - - - -

April 11, 1996

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Richard Brenton Tobias appeals the district court's judgment

dismissing his § 1983 claims arising out of his state criminal

prosecution and his incarceration at the Tarrant County Jail by

granting the defendants' motion to dismiss and motion for summary

judgment. We do not consider Tobias' argument regarding the

district court's denial of his motion for a restraining order

because Tobias did not brief it adequately. See Yohey v.

Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993). The district court 
No. 95-10577

-2-

properly dismissed Tobias' damages claims against Judge Young and

District Attorney Curry with prejudice based on absolute

immunity. See Boyd v. Biggers, 31 F.3d 279, 284 (5th Cir. 1994). 

Summary judgment on Tobias' medical claim was proper. See

Varnado v. Lynaugh, 920 F.2d 320, 321 (5th Cir. 1991). We do not

consider Tobias' argument that the district court erred in not

addressing the claims contained in his first supplemental

complaint due to Tobias' failure to call these issues to the

attention of the district court and his failure to state what

these issues are on appeal. Varnado, 920 F.2d at 321.

We hold that Tobias' appeal is frivolous, and accordingly,

we DISMISS it pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Tobias’ motion to

supplement the record is DENIED. Tobias was warned that he could

be sanctioned for filing frivolous appeals in Tobias v. Brown,

No. 95-40379 (5th Cir. Aug. 24, 1995). Tobias is hereby BARRED

from filing any pro se, in forma pauperis, civil appeal in this

court, or any pro se, in forma pauperis, initial civil pleading

in any court which is subject to this court's jurisdiction,

without the advance written permission of a judge of the forum

court; the clerk of this court and the clerks of all federal

district courts in this Circuit are directed to return to Tobias,

unfiled, any attempted submission inconsistent with this bar. 

MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS IMPOSED.
[875 NE2d 881, 844 NYS2d 163]

#### Hilary Guishard et al., Respondents, v General Security Insurance Company, Appellant.

Decided September 11, 2007

*901APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Melito & Adolfsen P.C.,*New York City (S. *Dwight Stephens*of counsel), for appellant.

*Tartamella, Tartamella & Fresolone,*Hauppauge *(Natale J. Tartamella*of counsel), for respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiffs seek a judgment declaring that defendant General Security Insurance Company is obligated under the terms of a commercial general liability policy to defend and indemnify them in a pending personal injury action. In the underlying lawsuit, the plaintiff alleges that he severely injured his eye while riveting metal to a van for the purpose of converting it into a “Mr. Softee” ice cream truck. Plaintiffs owned the van.

*902The policy excludes coverage for bodily injury “arising out of the ownership, maintenance, use or entrustment to others of any . . . ‘auto’ . . . owned or operated by or rented or loaned to any insured.” General Security moved for summary judgment declaring that it was not obligated to defend or indemnify plaintiffs because the conversion work performed by the injured party constituted “maintenance.” Plaintiffs cross-moved for summary judgment, arguing contrariwise.

Without written opinion, Supreme Court denied General Security’s motion and granted plaintiffs’ cross motion for summary judgment, and judgment was entered declaring that General Security was obligated to defend and indemnify plaintiffs. Upon appeal, the Appellate Division affirmed, reasoning that because General Security had not submitted the policy schedule defining the term “auto,” it had not demonstrated that the van fell within the relied-upon policy exclusion.

We affirm, but for a different reason. The work performed by the injured plaintiff did not constitute “maintenance” of an auto. “Maintenance,” as that term is used in an insurance policy, means performance of work on “an intrinsic part of the mechanism of the car and its overall function” *(Farmers Fire Ins. Co. v Kingsbury,*105 AD2d 519, 520 [3d Dept 1984] [removing tire from rim constitutes maintenance] [citation omitted], *Iv denied*64 NY2d 607 [1985]; *see Pennsylvania Millers Mut. Ins. Co. v Manco,*63 NY2d 940, 942 [1984] [changing a tire constitutes maintenance]). Riveting metal to a van in furtherance of its conversion to an ice cream truck aids in transforming the auto’s function, an activity distinct from “maintenance.”

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Subpart 5623.4 - Use of Recovered Materials     **Parent topic:** Part 5623 - ENVIRONMENT, CONSERVATION, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY, AND DRUGFREE WORKPLACE5623.404 Agency Affirmative Procurement Programs.    *(Revised*          *February 2007*          *)*       (a) Each contracting office shall refer to the Affirmative Procurement Plan (APP) (i.e. Green Procurement Plan (GPP)) of its host base for guidance on the promotion, compliance, and preference for use of recovered materials. Web sites for Army, Air Force, and Navy APPs can be found in the USSOCOM Desktop Resource Center (DCG).       (c) The Defense Acquisition University Government Purchase Card (GPC) tutorial provides USSOCOM approving officials and cardholders with guidance on the purchase of EPA-designated products at or below the micro-purchase threshold as required by FAR.5623.405 Procedures.    (c) Refer to the USSOCOM DCG for a template of the written justification required by FAR 23.405(b)          (2).              HQ, United States Special Operations Command       Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L)       SOFARS 5624       February 2007
#### DOLINSKY v. BRISKER UNTERSTUETZUNGS VEREIN.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

June 18, 1914.)

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Second District. Action by Isaac Dolinsky against the Brisker Unterstuetzungs Verein. From a default judgment, defendant appeals. Judgment vacated, and cause remanded.

Oscar Englander, of New York City, for appellant.

M. Brown, of New York City, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

It is unnecessary to pass upon the validity of the judgment entered in this action, but the defendant’s default should have been opened under the provisions of section 253 of the Municipal Court Act (Laws 1902, c. 580). Review & Record Co. v. Gilbreth, 65 Misc. Rep. 503, 120 N. Y. Supp. 100. Judgment vacated, default opened, and case set down for trial on the 30th day of June, 1914, with costs to appellant to abide the event.
Editorial Note on Part 91
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 91 appear at 61 FR 51350, Oct. 2 1996.

§ 91.45 Charges for laboratory services on a contract basis. ( a ) Irrespective of hourly fee rates and charges prescribed in § 91.37, or in other sections of this subchapter E, the Deputy Administrator may enter into contracts with applicants to perform continuous laboratory services or other types of laboratory services pursuant to the regulations in this part and other requirements, as prescribed by the Deputy Administrator in such contract. In addition, the charges for such laboratory services, provided in such contracts, shall be on such basis as will reimburse the Agricultural Marketing Service of the Department for the full cost of rendering such laboratory services, including an appropriate overhead charge to cover administrative overhead expenses as may be determined by the Administrator.
( b ) Irrespective of hourly fee rates and charges prescribed in this subpart I, or in other parts of this subchapter E, the Deputy Administrator may enter into a written Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) or agreement with any administrative agency or governing party for the performance of laboratory services pursuant to said agreement or order on a basis that will reimburse the Agricultural Marketing Service of the Department for the full cost of rendering such laboratory service, including an appropriate overhead administrative overhead charge.
( c ) The conditions and terms for renewal of such Memorandum of Understanding or agreement shall be specified in the contract.
[65 FR 64315, Oct. 26, 2000]
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 236 (Thursday, December 9, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76756-76757]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30899]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated July 23, 2010, and published in the Federal 
Register on August 4, 2010, (75 FR 47029), Johnson Matthey Pharma 
Services, 70 Flagship Drive, North Andover, Massachusetts 01845, made 
application by letter to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to 
be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled 
substances:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amphetamine (1100).........................  II
Methylphenidate (1724).....................  II
Hydrocodone (9193).........................  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to utilize this facility to manufacture small 
quantities of the listed controlled substances in bulk and to conduct 
analytical testing in support of the company's primary manufacturing 
facility in West Deptford, New Jersey. The controlled substances 
manufactured in bulk at this facility will be distributed to the 
company's customers.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and

[[Page 76757]]

determined that the registration of Johnson Matthey Pharma Services to 
manufacture the listed basic classes of controlled substances is 
consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has investigated 
Johnson Matthey Pharma Services to ensure that the company's 
registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation 
has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security 
systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local 
laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, 
pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, 
the above named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer 
of the basic classes of controlled substances listed.

    Dated: November 29, 2010.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-30899 Filed 12-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
Order entered May 1, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01039-CR

OLIVER BATTIE JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F12-12860-R

ORDER

On February 18, 2015, this Court ordered Mary Snider, former official court reporter of 

the 265th Judicial District Court, to file a supplemental record containing State’s Exhibit no. 1 

within fifteen days. To date, Ms. Snider has neither filed the supplemental record nor 

communicated with the Court regarding the status of the record.

Accordingly, we ORDER court reporter Mary Snider to file, by 4:00 p.m. on FRIDAY, 

MAY 8, 2015, a supplemental record containing State’s Exhibit no. 1. If the supplemental 

record with the exhibit is not filed by the date and time specified, we will order that Mary Snider 

not sit as a court reporter until she has filed the supplemental record in this appeal.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, to the Honorable Jennifer Bennett, 

Presiding Judge, 265th Judicial District Court; the Honorable Rick Magnis, Presiding Judge, 
283rd Judicial District Court; Mary Snider, official court reporter, 283rd Judicial District Court; 

and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

Contract ID: 480713 

EXTENSION AMENDMENT TO GOOGLE SERVICES AGREEMENT 

This Extension Amendment to the Google Services Agreement (“Amendment”), effective as of the first day following the current
expiration date of the Agreement (as defined below) (“Amendment Effective Date”), is between Synacor, Inc. (“Company”) and Google Inc. (“Google”) and amends the existing Google Services Agreement
between Company and Google (the “Agreement”). Capitalized terms not defined in this Amendment have the meanings given to those terms in the Agreement. The parties agree as follows: 

1.     Extension. The term of the Agreement is extended for an additional one month from the current expiration date. 

2.     General. The parties may execute this Amendment in counterparts, including facsimile, PDF, or other electronic
copies, which taken together will constitute one instrument. Except as expressly modified herein, the terms of the Agreement remain in full force and effect. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the Amendment Effective Date by persons duly authorized. 

 

			
	Company:
		
	By:	 	/s/ William J. Stuart
	Name:	 	William J. Stuart
	Title:	 	CFO
	Date:	 	02/22/18
	
	Google LLC
		
	By:	 	/s/ Philipp Schindler
	Name:	 	Philipp Schindler
	Title:	 	Authorized Signatory
	Date:	 	2018.02.22
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

ANTHONY BERNARD MOORER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv672-WKW

)

CITY OF MONTGOMERY, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER ON MOTION

Upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion to Strike (Doc. #31) filed 28 December

2007, and for good cause, it is 

ORDERED that the Motion (Doc. #31) is DENIED.

DONE this 15th day of February, 2008.

/s/ Wallace Capel, Jr.

WALLACE CAPEL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00672-WKW-WC Document 35 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 1 of 1
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

VIRGIN RECORDS AMERICA, )

INC., a California )

Company, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 3:06cv631-MHT

) 

RICKY WILLIAMS, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

Upon consideration of plaintiffs’ application for

entry of default judgment (doc. no. 8), it is ORDERED

that defendant Ricky Williams show cause, if any there

be, in writing by October 20, 2006, as to why said

application should not be granted. Defendant Williams is

informed that if he fails to respond within the time

allowed, the application will be granted and all the

relief requested by plaintiffs will be entered against

him.

Case 3:06-cv-00631-MHT-VPM Document 9 Filed 09/28/2006 Page 1 of 2
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to mail a copy of

this order and the application to defendant Williams by

certified mail, return receipt requested.

DONE, this the 28th day of September, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00631-MHT-VPM Document 9 Filed 09/28/2006 Page 2 of 2
Part 5639 - ACQUISITION OF INFORMATION

TECHNOLOGY

Subpart 5639.1 - GENERAL

5639.105 Privacy.

5639.105-90 Policy.

Subpart 5639.1 - GENERAL

5639.105 Privacy.

5639.105-90 Policy.

(d) The requiring activity will address the need for privacy protection in the specifications or

Statement of Work (SOW). Contracting officers will notify the appropriate organization or office

when it intends to issue a solicitation for items or services with an element of privacy protection.

Contracting officers will identify the point of contact or agency responsible for oversight of privacy

protection to the contractor after award.

HQ, United States Special Operations Command

Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L)

SOFARS 5639

February 2007
# C_2014420EN.01000601.xml

| 22.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 420/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 420/6

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 18 November 2014

appointing a member and an alternate member of the Governing Board of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work for Latvia

2014/C 420/05

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2062/94 of 18 July 1994 establishing a European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (1), and in particular Article 8 thereof,

1

Having regard to the lists of candidates submitted to the Council by the Governments of the Member States and by the employees’ and the employers’ organisations,

Having regard to the lists of members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work,

Whereas:

| (1) | By its Decisions of 2 December 2013 (2) and of 12 June 2014 (3), the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Governing Board of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work for the period ending on 7 November 2016. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By its Decisions of 2 December 2013 (2) and of 12 June 2014 (3), the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Governing Board of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work for the period ending on 7 November 2016.

2

3

| (2) | The employers’ organisation BUSINESSEUROPE has submitted nominations for two posts to be filled, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The employers’ organisation BUSINESSEUROPE has submitted nominations for two posts to be filled,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following shall be appointed member and alternate member of the Governing Board of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work for the period ending on 7 November 2016:

III.   REPRESENTATIVES OF EMPLOYERS’ ORGANISATIONS

| Country | Member | Alternate member |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Latvia | Mr Aleksandrs GRIGORJEVS | Mr Andris POMMERS |

Country

Member

Alternate member

Latvia

Mr Aleksandrs GRIGORJEVS

Mr Andris POMMERS

Article 2

The Council shall appoint the members and alternate members who have not yet been nominated at a later date.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 18 November 2014.

For the Council

The President

S. GOZI

---

(1)  OJ L 216, 20.8.1994, p. 1.

1

(2)  Council Decision of 2 December 2013 appointing the members and alternate members of the Governing Board of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (OJ C 360, 10.12.2013, p. 8).

2

(3)  Council Decision of 12 June 2014 appointing the members and alternate members of the Governing Board of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work for Lithuania and Malta (OJ C 182, 14.6.2014, p. 14); Council Decision of 12 June 2014 appointing the members and alternate members of the Governing Board of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work for France (OJ C 186, 18.6.2014, p. 5).

3

---