alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**GLOBAL
      DEVELOPMENT INC.**


**FORM
      10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




I
      am the
      Chief Financial Officer of Global Development Inc., a Delaware corporation
      (the
      "Company"). I am delivering this certificate in connection with the Form 10-K
      of
      the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005 and filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission ("Form 10-K").




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
      the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
      in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
                November 29, 2006
              
              
              /s/
                Julius Briner
              
              Julius
                Briner
              Chief
                Financial Officer
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

MARIE TOOLE and )

CHRIS TOOLE, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv652-MHT

) 

MATTHEW CHUPP, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion for summary judgment

(doc. no. 18) is set for submission, without oral

argument, on January 26, 2007, with any opposing brief

and evidentiary materials due by said date.

DONE, this the 9th day of January, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00652-MHT-WC Document 22 Filed 01/09/2007 Page 1 of 1
1331.205-70 Duplication of effort.       The Department will not pay any costs for work that is duplicative of costs charged against any other contract, subcontract or Government source. Insert clause 1352.231-71, *Duplication of Effort,* in all cost-reimbursement, time and materials, and labor hour solicitations and contracts when applicable.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1331.2 - Contracts With Commercial Organizations
714.408-170 Partner vetting.       If an acquisition is identified as subject to vetting, see (48 CFR) AIDAR 704.70 for the applicable procedures and requirements.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 714.4—Opening of Bids and Award of Contract
#### § 930.150 Primary inventory reserve.

Beginning July 1, 2012, the primary inventory reserve may not exceed 100 million pounds.

[77 FR 40253, July 9, 2012]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

 

NICHOLAS STRICKLAND, et al., * 

 * 

 Plaintiffs, * 

 * 

v. * Case Number: 1:06-CV-00682-TFM 

 * 

CHAMPION HOME BUILDERS CO., 

INC., et al., 

*

* 

 

 * UNOPPOSED 

 Defendants. * 

JOINT STATUS REPORT

 COME NOW the Plaintiffs and Champion Home Builders Co., by and through counsel 

and provide the following as the Joint Status Report: 

 1. The parties have reached a firm settlement in the above matter and are in process 

of executing the Settlement Agreement and circulating the General Release. 

 2. It is expected that the above can be accomplished within the next thirty (30) to 

sixty (60) days. 

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the parties pray that the case be stayed 

an additional thirty (30) to sixty (60) days with the understanding the parties will immediately 

dismiss the case once the settlement is consummated, and for such other and different relief as is 

just. 

Respectfully submitted, 

RITCHEY & SIMPSON, PLLC 

/s/ Gregory S. Ritchey

Gregory S. Ritchey, Esquire {ASB-8193-H68G} 

Richard S. Walker, Esquire {ASB-8719-L70R}

Counsel for Champion Home Builders Co. 

Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 72 Filed 07/01/2008 Page 1 of 2
OF COUNSEL:

RITCHEY & SIMPSON, PLLC 

The Mountain Brook Center 

2700 Highway 280, Suite 203 West 

Birmingham, AL 35223-2468 

Phone: 205.876.1600 

Facsimile 205.876.1616 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I, the undersigned, do hereby certify that on the 1st day of July, 2008, I electronically 

filed the foregoing with the Clerk of Court using the electronic filing system which will send 

notification of the foregoing upon the following: 

Jere L. Beasley, Esquire 

W. Daniel Miles, III, Esquire 

C. Gibson Vance, Esquire 

C. Lance Gould, Esquire 

BEASLEY, ALLEN, CROW, 

METHVIN, PORTIS & MILES, P.C. 

Post Office Box 4160 

Montgomery, AL 36103 

/s/ Gregory S. Ritchey

OF COUNSEL 

Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 72 Filed 07/01/2008 Page 2 of 2
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

§ 810.402 Definition of other terms. ( a ) *Broken corn.* All matter that passes readily through a 12 ⁄ 64 round-hole sieve and over a 6 ⁄ 64 round-hole sieve sample according to procedures prescribed in FGIS instructions.
( b ) *Broken corn and foreign material.* All matter that passes readily through a 12 ⁄ 64 round-hole sieve and all matter other than corn that remains in the sieved after sieving according to procedures prescribed in FGIS instructions.
( c ) *Classes.* There are three classes for corn: Yellow corn, White corn, and Mixed corn. ( 1 ) *Yellow corn.* Corn that is yellow-kerneled and contains not more than 5.0 percent of corn of other colors. Yellow kernels of corn with a slight tinge of red are considered yellow corn.
( 2 ) *White corn.* Corn that is white-kerneled and contains not more than 2.0 percent of corn of other colors. White kernels of corn with a slight tinge of light straw or pink color are considered white corn.
( 3 ) *Mixed corn.* Corn that does not meet the color requirements for either of the classes Yellow corn or White corn and includes white-capped Yellow corn.
( d ) *Damaged kernels.* Kernels and pieces of corn kernels that are badly ground-damaged, badly weather-damaged, diseased, frost-damaged, germ-damaged, heat-damaged, insect-bored, mold-damaged, sprout-damaged, or otherwise materially damaged.
( e ) *Foreign material.* All matter that passes readily through a 6 ⁄ 64 round-hole sieve and all matter other than corn that remains on top of the 12 ⁄ 64 round-hole sieve according to procedures prescribed in FGIS instructions.
( f ) *Heat-damaged kernels.* Kernels and pieces of corn kernels that are materially discolored and damaged by heat.
( g ) *Sieves* — ( 1 ) *12/64 round-hole sieve.* A metal sieve 0.032 inch thick with round perforations 0.1875 (12/64) inch in diameter which are 1 ⁄ 4 inch from center to center. The perforations of each row shall be staggered in relation to the adjacent row.
( 2 ) *6/64 round-hole sieve.* A metal sieve 0.032 inch thick with round perforations 0.0937 (6/64) inch in diameter which are 5 ⁄ 32 inch from center to center. The perforations of each row shall be staggered in relation to the adjacent row.
[52 FR 24418, June 30, 1987, as amended at 52 FR 24437, June 30, 1987; 52 FR 28534, July 31, 1987]
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3089 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Serra automated guided vehicles. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. BROWNBACK introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Serra automated guided 

vehicles. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SERRA AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.84.28 Serra automated guided vehicles (provided for in subheading 8428.90.00) ....... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 3089 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
#### Ramona Matos, Respondent, v City of New York et al., Defendants, and New York City Housing Authority, Appellant.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered September 18,1979, which required defendant New York City Housing Authority to produce available records concerning complaints for the five-year period prior to the accident with respect to the particular stove model involved in the accident for all authority projects, unanimously modified, on the law, on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of limiting discovery to records of complaints about the particular stove model involved in the accident for the three-year period prior to the accident, and limited to such stoves installed in Vladek Houses, the project wherein the accident occurred, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs and disbursements. On March 30, 1975, a kitchen stove in the Vladek Houses project, managed by defendant New York City Housing Authority, exploded in the apartment occupied by plaintiff, thereby injuring her. Plaintiff sought discovery in connection wth a deposition with respect to reports and complaints received by the authority regarding any stove which may have been involved in similiar accidents. Such discovery, unlimited in time and place was clearly too broad. Plaintiff is entitled to reasonable discovery, that is, to discover complaints, if any, made to the authority respecting the same stove model for a reasonable period prior to the accident, which period under the circumstances herein we set at three years. Further, the project wherein the accident occurred contains 1,771 apartments, and the same parameter of reasonableness requires on this record limiting discovery to this housing project. To require production of complaints with respect to all of the authority’s projects is, at this stage, burdensome and oppressive. A blunderbuss approach to discovery seeking a wholesale fishing expedition is improper *(see Butler*v *District Council 37, Amer. Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO,*72 AD2d 720). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Markewich, Lupiano, Silverman and Carro, JJ.
#### § 925.27 Alternate members.

An alternate member shall act in the place of the member during such member's absence or at such member's request, and may be assigned other program duties by the chairman or the committee. In the event of the death, removal, resignation, or disqualification of a member the alternate shall act for the member until a successor for such member is selected and has qualified. In the event that both a member and that member's alternate are unable to attend a committee meeting, the member or committee members present may designate any other alternate to serve in such member's place at the meeting if such action is necessary to secure a quorum: *Provided,* That not more than two members or alternates acting for members who are affiliated with the same handler entity shall serve as members at the same meeting.
#### In the Matter of Northern Operating Corp., Appellant, v. Milton H. Chamberlain, as Village Clerk of the Village of Pomona, Respondent.

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR to direct respondent to issue the certificate provided for in subdivision 1 of section 179-k of the Village Law, petitioner appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated April 4, 1969, as confirmed the Referee’s report and dismissed the petition. Judgment reversed insofar as appealed from, with costs, on the law; Referee’s report disaffirmed, petition granted and respondent directed to issue to petitioner the certificate. Respondent argues that petitioner was not *687entitled to the public hearing mandated therein because the subdivision plats submitted by the petitioner did not conform to the zoning ordinance of the village and because the statute requires a hearing only in connection with plats which the village planning board intends to approve. With respect to respondent’s claim that the requirements of the statute are inapplicable to petitioner’s nonconforming plats, we have heretofore decided that issue against him, noting however, that by our present action we do not hold that this plat complies with the zoning regulations. The necessity of compliance by petitioner with local laws and regulations remains *(Matter of Fishman*v. *Arnzen,*29 A D 2d 954; *Matter of Scarsdale Meadows*v. *Smith,*20 A D 2d 906). With respect to respondent’s claim that the requirements of the statute are contingent upon the planning board’s intention to approve a submitted plat, we think his construction contrary to the language of the statute and unreasonable. After providing for a public hearing, the statute states that, *“*The planning board may thereupon approve, modify and approve, or disapprove such plats or the proposed development thereof.” Thus, the statute intends a determination by the board following a public hearing. Further, the Legislature could not have discriminatorily intended to extend public hearings in connection with subdivision plats under section 276 of the *Town Law,*but not to similar applications under section 179-k of the *Village Law.*Christ, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins and Brennan, JJ., concur. (Beldock, P. J., deceased.)
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3038 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3038

          To suspend temporarily the duty on Vulkazon AFS/LG.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

  Mr. Graham introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on Vulkazon AFS/LG.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VULKAZON AFS/LG.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.11.56        Pentaerythritolbis(tet  Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           rahydrobenzaldehyde                                               31/2009          ''
                           acetal) (CAS No. 6600-                                                              .
                           31-3) (provided for
                           in subheading
                           2932.99.90)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
5204.7303-1 General.    (b)(S-90) As provided in the memorandum titled, “Updated Implementation of the DIB Memo” dated 06 September 2019, the DON recognizes the ongoing efforts within the DOD to protect controlled unclassified information and unclassified networks. In the interim, the contracting officer shall -       (a) Include the contents of Annex 16 in the statements of work of solicitations, contracts and task or delivery orders when notified by the DON Program Manager, Program Executive Officer, or Chief of Naval Research, in coordination with the Resource Sponsor, that the risk to a critical program and/or technology warrants its inclusion.       (b) Consider the DFARS Clause at 252.204-7012, and to the extent its contents are included in statements of work of solicitations, contracts and task or delivery orders, the DIB memo, and Annex 16, to be material requirements.       (c) Consider the right to reduce or suspend progress payments for contractor noncompliance (see Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 32.503-6) or for nonconforming supplies or services (see FAR 46.407).       i. When the contracting officer decides to accept supplies or services with critical or major non-conformances (e.g., failure to comply with a material requirement), the contracting officer shall modify the contract to provide for an equitable price reduction or other consideration.       1. An amount approximating 5% of the contract’s value could be considered reasonable based on the risk to the Government for this noncompliance.       2. In situations where an increased risk is identified by the requirements office, the contracting officer should consider an amount equal to this increased risk.       ii. When the contracting officer decides to require correction of nonconformance rather than acceptance, withholding/reduction or suspension of progress payments should be considered if correction is not effected in a timely manner. **Parent topic:** 5204.7303 Procedures.
Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 5 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 5 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) Case No.: 2:06-mj-075-DRB

 )

RONALD MCQUEEN )

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

COMES NOW the undersigned counsel, Donnie W. Bethel, and enters his appearance

on behalf of Defendant, Ronald McQueen, in the above-styled case.

Dated this 2 day of August 2006. nd

Respectfully submitted, 

s/ Donnie W. Bethel

DONNIE W. BETHEL

Assistant Federal Defender

201 Monroe Street, Suite 407

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Phone: (334) 834-2099

Fax: (334) 834-0353

E-mail:don_bethel@fd.org

IN Bar Code: 14773-49

Case 2:06-mj-00075-DRB Document 9 Filed 08/02/2006 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) Case No.: 2:06-mj-075-DRB

 )

RONALD MCQUEEN )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 2 , 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk

of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following:

Tommie Brown Hardwick, Assistant U. S. Attorney, One Court Square, Suite 201, Montgomery, 

Alabama 36104. 

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Donnie W. Bethel

DONNIE W. BETHEL

Assistant Federal Defender

201 Monroe Street, Suite 407

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Phone: (334) 834-2099

Fax: (334) 834-0353

E-mail:don_bethel@fd.org

IN Bar Code: 14773-49

Case 2:06-mj-00075-DRB Document 9 Filed 08/02/2006 Page 2 of 2
November 26, 2014

Michelle Ferritto

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Federal Aviation Administration 

490 L'Enfant Plaza #3200 

Washington, DC 20024

RE: Request for Additional Information: Aerial Media Systems, Petitions for Exemption, Docket 

Number FAA-2014-0957.

Dear Mrs. Ferritto

Below, is the response to the letter sent November 24, 2014 requesting more information per 

11.81 (D) The reasons why granting your request would be in the public interest; that is, how it 

would benefit the public as a whole.

Granting Aerial Media System exemption request furthers the public interest in many ways.

Congress has pronounced that it is in the public's interest to integrate commercially flown UASs 

into the national airspace system. Aerial Media Systems will conduct research into safe UAS 

operations every time it flies one of its UASs. Flight data, visual inspections, recorded 

observations and flight analyses are compiled to further enhance current safety procedures. 

Allowing Aerial Media Systems to fly commercially, will allow real world experience to help 

develop better and more robust safety procedures. The public has an interest in reducing the 

danger and emission associated with current aerial cinematic capture methods, namely, full size 

helicopters. Aerial Media Systems UASs are battery powered and create no emissions. If an 

Aerial Media Systems UAS crashes, there is no fuel to ignite and cause significant damage or 

injury. The impact of Aerial Media Systems lightweight UASs is far less than a full size 

helicopter or current aerial platforms. Although, the noteworthy safety record of full size 

helicopters used in the motion picture industry currently is impeccable. The public's interest is 

furthered, by minimizing ecological and crash impacts, by permitting motion picture capture 

through Aerial Media Systems lightweight UASs. Aerial Medial Systems has been analyzing 

flight data and other information into novel safety protocols. These procedures and lessons will be

implemented into flight operations manual that exceeds currently accepted means and methods of 

safe flight. Aerial Media Systems and Brian Walk through years of command experience on large 

cabin corporate aircraft, have based their Flight operations manual, off of an IBAO stage II manual

for a manned aircraft, which Brian Walk is the author of. Congress mandated the integration of 

UASs into our national airspace system, in part, to achieve progression in this field. Permitting 

Aerial Media Systems to immediately fly within the United States furthers these goals. Whether 

it is the scientific discoveries applicable to feature film making to advancements in publicly 

usable technologies, or advancements in equipment available to law enforcement personnel I first 

responders that does not cost millions of dollars, granting Aerial Media Systems exemption 
request substantially furthers the public's interest in ways known and currently unknown and 

unquantified.

Sincerely,

Brian M. Walk
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3083 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3083

    To suspend temporarily the duty on traveler padded potty seats.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

 Mr. Brownback introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on traveler padded potty seats.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRAVELER PADDED POTTY SEATS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.39.24        Traveler padded potty   Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           seats (provided for                                               31/2009          ''
                           in subheading                                                                       .
                           3924.90.55)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```