alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation

# Time AND Date

 2:30 p.m., Wednesday, December 15, 2010.

# Place:

 1325 G Street, NW., Suite 800, Boardroom, Washington, DC 20005.

# Status:

 Open.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

                        Erica Hall, Assistant Corporate Secretary, (202) 220-2376;                         *ehall@nw.org.*

AGENDA: 

I. Call to order

II. Approval of the Minutes

III. Summary Report of the Corporate Administration Committee

IV. Summary Report of the Finance, Budget and Program Committee

V. Summary Report of the Corporate Administration Committee

VI. Summary Report of the Audit Committee

VII. Approval of the Minutes

VIII. Approval of the Minutes

IX. Approval of the Minutes

X. Approval of the Revised Minutes

XI. Board Policy Regarding Elected Officials

XII. Financial Report

XIII. Corporate Scorecard

XIV. Chief Executive Officer's Management Report

XV. Strategic Planning Discussion

XVI. CEO Search Update

XVII. CAC Report on Interim Salary Adjustments

XVIII. Adjournment

Erica Hall,

Assistant Corporate Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-31009 Filed 12-9-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7570-02-M
PART 724—PROTECTION OF PRIVACY AND FREEDOM OF INFORMATION       Authority:                            Sec. 621, Pub. L. 87–195, 75 Stat. 445, (22 U.S.C. 2381) as amended; E.O. 12163, Sept. 29, 1979, 44 FR 56673; 3 CFR, 1979 Comp., p. 435.          Source:                            49 FR 13248, Apr. 3, 1984, unless otherwise noted.                                       Subpart 724.2—Freedom of Information Act                                                         724.202 Policy.    **Parent topic:** SUBCHAPTER D—SOCIOECONOMIC PROGRAMSSubpart 724.2—Freedom of Information Act    724.202 Policy.       The U.S. Agency for International Development's policies concerning implementation of the Freedom of Information Act are codified in 22 CFR part 212 (USAID Regulation 12).
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2:06-cr-0169-WHA

)

WILLIAM EARL ULMER, )

Defendant. )

MOTION TO HAVE DEFENDANT PRESENT AT 

THE PRETRIAL CONFERNCE

COMES NOW the defendant, William Earl Ulmer, by and through the undersigned

counsel, Timothy C. Halstrom, and respectfully requests Defendants presence at the pretrial

conference and in support thereof states as follows:

1. Defendant is presently detained in the custody of the U.S. Marshal Service.

2. Counsel has received this day a request from Defendant that he be present at the

pretrial conference now set for 3:00PM on September 28, 2007.

WHEREFORE, premises considered, Defendant respectfully requests this Honorable

Court to issue an Order directing the U.S. Marshal to produce Defendant at said pre-trial

conference.

Respectfully submitted this 24 day of September, 2007. th

s/ Timothy C. Halstrom

Timothy C. Halstrom (HAL )

Attorney for Defendant Ulmer

4170 Lomac Street

Montgomery, AL 36106

(334) 272-9524 Telephone

(334) 244-7474 Facsimile

halstromtim@aol.com email

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 317 Filed 09/24/2007 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on September 24, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing with the

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to the

appropriate parties:

s/Timothy C. Halstrom

OF COUNSEL

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 317 Filed 09/24/2007 Page 2 of 2
52.236-9 Protection of Existing Vegetation,

Structures, Equipment, Utilities, and

Improvements.

As prescribed in 36.509 , insert the following clause:

Protection of Existing Vegetation, Structures, Equipment, Utilities, and Improvements (Apr 1984)

(a) The Contractor shall preserve and protect all structures, equipment, and vegetation (such as

trees, shrubs, and grass) on or adjacent to the work site, which are not to be removed and which do

not unreasonably interfere with the work required under this contract. The Contractor shall only

remove trees when specifically authorized to do so, and shall avoid damaging vegetation that will

remain in place. If any limbs or branches of trees are broken during contract performance, or by the

careless operation of equipment, or by workmen, the Contractor shall trim those limbs or branches

with a clean cut and paint the cut with a tree-pruning compound as directed by the Contracting

Officer.

(b) The Contractor shall protect from damage all existing improvements and utilities (1)at or near

the work site, and (2)on adjacent property of a third party, the locations of which are made known to

or should be known by the Contractor. The Contractor shall repair any damage to those facilities,

including those that are the property of a third party, resulting from failure to comply with the

requirements of this contract or failure to exercise reasonable care in performing the work. If the

Contractor fails or refuses to repair the damage promptly, the Contracting Officer may have the

necessary work performed and charge the cost to the Contractor.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.236 [Reserved]
162 So.2d 15

#### Wilson P. ABRAHAM v. GREATER BATON ROUGE CONSOLIDATED SEWERAGE DISTRICT.

No. 47148.

April 2, 1964.

In re: Wilson P. Abraham applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 159 So.2d 525.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, we find no error of fact in the judgment complained of.
# Subpart 703.1—Safeguards

**Parent topic:**PART 703—IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

## 703.104-4 Disclosure, protection, and marking of contractor bid or proposal information and source selection information.

A contracting officer may authorize the release of proprietary and/or source selection information outside the Government for evaluation purposes pursuant to (48 CFR) FAR 15.305(c) and (48 CFR) AIDAR 715.305(c). 

## 703.104-7 Violations or possible violations.

Requests for concurrence under paragraph (a)(1) of (48 CFR) FAR 3.104–7 must be forwarded to one level above the contracting officer.
#### Andrew Harpending, as Administrator, etc., Appellant, *v*. Stephen T. Arnot et al., Respondents.

(Argued February 28,1884;

decided June 24, 1884.)

The principal question in this case was as to the effect of a former judgment as a bar. The court held that the material facts at issue herein were presented and determined m the former action, and that, therefore, it was a bar.

*650
      *William F. Cogswell*for appellant.

*George B. Bradley*for respondents.'

Roger, Ch. J.,

reads for affirmance.

All concur, except Earl and Finch, JJ., dissenting, and Danforth, J., not voting.

Judgment affirmed.
§ 983.14 Handle. *Handle* means to engage in: ( a ) Receiving pistachios;
( b ) Hulling and drying pistachios;
( c ) Further preparing pistachios by sorting, sizing, shelling, roasting, cleaning, salting, and/or packaging for marketing in or transporting to any and all markets in the current of interstate or foreign commerce; and/or
( d ) Placing pistachios into the current of commerce from within the production area to points outside thereof: *Provided,* however, that transportation within the production area between handlers and from the orchard to the processing facility is not handling.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 14 (Monday, January 23, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 3323]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-1201]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

Applications of Universal Jet Aviation, Inc. for Certificate 
Authority

AGENCY: Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice of Order to Show Cause (Order 2012-1-11); Dockets DOT-
OST-2011-0150 and DOT-OST-2011-0151.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Transportation is directing all interested 
persons to show cause why it should not issue orders finding Universal 
Jet Aviation, Inc., fit, willing, and able, and to provide interstate 
and foreign charter air transportation of persons, property and mail, 
using one large aircraft.

DATES: Persons wishing to file objections should do so no later than 
January 31, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Objections and answers to objections should be filed in 
Dockets DOT-OST-2011-0150 and DOT-OST-2011-0151 and addressed to U.S. 
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, (M-30, Room W12-140), 
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 
20590, and should be served upon the parties listed in Attachment A to 
the order.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Catherine J. O'Toole, Air Carrier 
Fitness Division (X-56, Room W86-489), U.S. Department of 
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 
366-9721.

    Dated: January 13, 2012.
Robert A. Letteney,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2012-1201 Filed 1-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
§ 763.17 Approving application and executing guarantee. ( a ) Approval is subject to the availability of funds, meeting the requirements in this part, and the participation of an approved escrow or servicing agent, as applicable.
( b ) Upon approval of the guarantee, all parties (buyer, seller, escrow or servicing agent, and Agency official) will execute the Agency's guarantee agreement.
( c ) The “Land Contract Agreement for Prompt Payment Guarantee” or the “Land Contract Agreement for Standard Guarantee” will describe the conditions of the guarantee, outline the covenants and any agreements of the buyer, seller, escrow or servicing agent, and the Agency, and outline the process for payment of loss claims.
May 29, 2015

Mr. Ray Renteria UAV Aeronautics Investigation & Logistics

6225 W 1 st Avenue Lakewood, CO 80226

Dear Mr. Renteria.:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your April 28, 2015, exemption request on behalf into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-1252), but we are unable to pr ocess your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2887 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2887

    To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on difenoconazole.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 19, 2006

   Mr. Burr introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on difenoconazole.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DIFENOCONAZOLE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.02.12 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to difenoconazole) is amended 
by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 91
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 91 appear at 61 FR 51350, Oct. 2 1996.

§ 91.9 How to make an application. ( a ) *Voluntary.* An application for analysis and testing may be made by contacting the director or supervisor of the Science and Technology laboratory where the service is provided, or by contacting the Technical Services Branch Chief at Science and Technology Headquarters, Washington, DC. A list of the Science and Technology laboratories is included in § 91.5.
( b ) *Mandatory.* In the case of mandatory analyses, such as those required to be performed on eggs and egg products, application for services may be submitted to the office or USDA agency which administers the program, or by contacting an inspector or grader who is involved with the program.
[65 FR 64310, Oct. 26, 2000]
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.26






Director Compensation Summary Term Sheet


During calendar year 2017, each non-employee member of the Board was entitled to receive an aggregate of $130,000 in cash and restricted stock.  The cash portion of the compensation was paid quarterly in $10,000 increments.  The remainder of such compensation was paid in restricted shares of the Company’s Class A common stock, and vested on December 31, 2017 to individuals who were on the Board on December 31, 2017.


In addition to the foregoing, for 2017 each non-employee director was entitled to receive $1,500 for each Board or committee meeting attended.  Further, the Chairman of each of the Executive Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and the Compensation Committee was paid an additional retainer of $2,500 per quarter.  The Chairman of the Audit Committee was paid a retainer of $3,000 per quarter. In addition to the amounts set forth above, the Chairman of the Board was entitled to receive (i) a retainer of $90,000, payable quarterly in restricted shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock pursuant to the terms of the Crawford & Company Non-Employee Director Stock Plan.


During calendar year 2018, each non-employee member of the Board is entitled to receive an aggregate of $130,000 in cash and restricted stock.  The cash portion of the compensation will be paid quarterly in $10,000 increments.  The remainder of such compensation will be paid in restricted shares of the Company’s Class A common stock, and will vest on December 31, 2018 to individuals who are on the Board on December 31, 2018.


In addition to the foregoing, for 2017 each non-employee director is entitled to receive $1,500 for each Board or committee meeting attended.  Further, the Chairman of each of the Executive Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and the Compensation Committee is paid an additional retainer of $2,500 per quarter.  The Chairman of the Audit Committee is paid a retainer of $3,000 per quarter. In addition to the amounts set forth above, the Chairman of the Board is entitled to receive a retainer of $90,000, payable quarterly in restricted shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock pursuant to the terms of the Crawford & Company Non-Employee Director Stock Plan.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3395 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain high tenacity rayon 

filament yarn. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 6, 2006 

Mr. DEMINT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain high 

tenacity rayon filament yarn. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF CERTAIN EXISTING DUTY SUS4 PENSIONS. 

5 (a) EXISTING DUTY SUSPENSIONS.—Heading 

6 9902.05.07 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

7 United States (relating to high tenacity yarn of viscose 

8 rayon with a decitex of less than 1000) is amended by 

9 striking the date in the effective period column and insert10 ing ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•S 3395 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 subsection (a) apply to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
Conversation of PMN Substances

Sanitized
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

KENNETH J. DAVIS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06cv670-WC

)

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, )

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL )

SECURITY, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

On July 9, 2008, Plaintiff moved the Court for Attorney’s Fees Under the Equal

Access to Justice Act (Doc. #35). Upon consideration of the Motion, it is

ORDERED that Defendant shall show cause in writing on or before July 24,

2008, why this Court should not grant the Motion (Doc #35). 

DONE this 10th day of July, 2008.

/s/ Wallace Capel, Jr.

WALLACE CAPEL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00670-WC Document 36 Filed 07/10/2008 Page 1 of 1
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

WILLIE MCNAIR, )

)

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2:06-cv-695-WKW

)

RICHARD ALLEN, et al., )

)

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. )

____________________________________

)

JAMES CALLAHAN, )

)

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2:06-cv-919-WKW

)

RICHARD ALLEN, et al., )

)

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. )

ORDER

On November 28, 2006, the court entered an order (Doc. # 26) directing, among other things,

that the defendants file with the court a copy of the execution protocol at issue in this case. See

Order, at 3 (“The defendants shall also file a copy of the execution protocol when they file their

amended answer.”). The court notes that the defendants filed their amended answer on

December 21, 2006, but have failed to file a copy of the execution protocol. It is ORDERED that,

on or before January 24, 2007, the defendants shall either show cause in writing why they have

failed to comply with an order of this court or file the execution protocol under seal pursuant to the

confidentiality order. 

Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 35 Filed 01/16/2007 Page 1 of 2
Done this 16th day of January, 2007.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 35 Filed 01/16/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### § 981.14 Cooperative handler.

*Cooperative handler* means any handler as defined in § 981.13 of this subpart which qualifies for treatment as a nonprofit cooperative association as defined in Section 54001, *et seq.* of the California Food and Agricultural Code. The Board, with the approval of the Secretary, may modify this definition, if necessary.

[61 FR 32920, June 26, 1996]
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statement No. 333-140007 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 14, 2008, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatoryparagraphs regarding changes in the manner in which Guidance Software, Inc. and subsidiary, accounts for share based compensation in 2006 and uncertainty in income taxes in 2007) of Guidance Software, Inc. and subsidiary, and the effectiveness ofGuidance Software, Inc. and subsidiary’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Guidance Software, Inc. and subsidiary for the year ended December 31, 2007. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Los Angeles, California 

March 14, 2008
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

GREGORY SCOTT, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-654-MEF

)

NORMENT SECURITY GROUP, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the Joint Motion for Extension of Deadline for Dispositive

Motions (Doc. #17) filed on June 6, 2007, it is hereby

ORDERED that the motion is DENIED.

DONE this the 8th day of June, 2007.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00654-MEF-WC Document 19 Filed 06/08/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Alfano, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County, rendered May 3, 1979, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. Defendant contends that, inasmuch as he waived his right to be prosecuted by indictment and pleaded guilty to a superior court information charging him with criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, the subsequent indictment, count one of which alleges the same crime, placed him in double jeopardy. Defendant has misapprehended his right to waive prosecution by indictment of a (then) class A felony. He may not waive that right (see CPL 195.10, subd 1, par [b]). The plea to the information was therefore a nullity and jeopardy did not attach (see CPL 40.30; *Downum*v *United States,*372 US 734). The letter to defendant’s lawyer dated November 21, 1978 satisfied the obligation of the People to notify the defendant of the Grand Jury proceeding (see CPL 190.50, subd 5, par [a]). Furthermore, as the People note, if defendant felt aggrieved because of lack of notice, there was opportunity to move to dismiss the indictment on that ground following his arraignment upon the indictment (see CPL 190.50, subd 5, par [c]). Rabin, J. P., Margett, Martuscello and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
#### Henry Smith, Appellant, *v.*The State of New York, Respondent.

(Argued April 21, 1884 ;

decided June 27, 1884.)

*Norton Ghase*for appellant.

*663
      *Denis*O’Brien, attorney-general, for respondent.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.