alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# SUBPART 16.5 –– INDEFINITE–DELIVERY CONTRACTS

**Parent topic:**PART 16 –– TYPES OF CONTRACTS

## 16.504 Indefinite–quantity contracts.

(S-90) Funding for the minimum guarantee shall be obligated at the time of contract award via the first order. (See DARS 7.105(b)(6))

## 16.505 Ordering.

(b)(6) *Postaward**Notices and Debriefing of Awardees for Orders Exceeding $6 million*. The Initial Letter to Unsuccessful Offerors and Debriefing Letter to Unsuccessful Offerors, located in the DARS PGI, shall be used to notify unsuccessful awardees when the total price of a task or delivery order exceeds $6 million.

(b)(8) *Task-order and delivery-order ombudsman*. The Designation and Delegation of Authority for the Agency Task and Delivery Order Ombudsman is located at https://www.ditco.disa.mil/hq/delegation_memos.asp.

## 16.601 Time–and–materials contracts.

(d)(1) Time-and-materials or labor-hour CLINS for strictly travel costs or Other Direct Costs that are ancillary to the primary purpose of a fixed price contract do not require a determination and findings. T&M or LH CLINS shall not exceed 33.33% of the total contract value, not including travel; a D&F is required if exceeding 33.33%.

## 216.601 Time–and–materials contracts.

(d)(i)(A)(1)(i) The Chief of the Contracting Office is the senior contracting official within the contracting activity.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-26-1998
<CASH>                                             197
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   62,010
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,303
<INVENTORY>                                     99,630
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               161,969
<PP&E>                                         300,624
<DEPRECIATION>                                 185,785
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 284,868
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           83,167
<BONDS>                                         60,455
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        68,937
<OTHER-SE>                                      68,582
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   284,868
<SALES>                                        229,276
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               229,276
<CGS>                                          191,486
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  191,486
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,696
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,003
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,648
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,426
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,222
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (954)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,268
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .37
        


</TABLE>
47.207-7 Liability and insurance.(a) 						            The contracting officer shall specify-                                      (1) 								                The contractor’s liability for injury to persons or damage to property other than the freight being transported;                                         (2) The contractor’s liability for loss of and/or damage to the freight being transported; and                                         (3) 								                The amount of insurance the contractor is required to maintain.                                                (b) 						            When the contractor’s liability for loss of and/or damage to the freight being transported is not specified, the usual measure of liability as prescribed in section 11706 of the Interstate Commerce Act (49 U.S.C.11706) applies.                             (c) 						            The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.247-21, Contractor Liability for Personal Injury and/or Property Damage.                             (d) 						            The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.247-22, Contractor Liability for Loss of and/or Damage to Freight other than Household Goods, in solicitations and contracts for the transportation of freight other than household goods.                             (e) 						            The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.247-23, Contractor Liability for Loss of and/or Damage to Household Goods, in solicitations and contracts for the transportation of household goods, including the rate per pound appropriate to the situation.                             (f) 						            When freight is not shipped under rates subject to released or declared value, see 28.313(a) and the clause at 52.228-9, Cargo Insurance.                             (g) 						            When the contracting officer determines that vehicular liability and/or general public liability insurance required by law are not sufficient for a contract, see 28.313(b) and the clause at 52.228-10, Vehicular and General Public Liability Insurance.**Parent topic:** 47.207 Solicitation provisions, contract clauses, and special requirements.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3197 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3197

   To modify the provisions of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 
              United States relating to returned property.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

  Mrs. Murray introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To modify the provisions of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 
              United States relating to returned property.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF PROVISIONS RELATING TO RETURNED PROPERTY.

    (a) In General.--The article description for subheading 9801.00.10 
of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by 
inserting ``, or products previously exported from the United States,'' 
after ``United States''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 799.17 Public meetings. ( a ) In consultation with the NECM, the SEC will determine if public meetings will be held on a proposed action to: ( 1 ) Inform the public about the details of a proposed action and its possible environmental effects;
( 2 ) Gather information about the public concerns; and
( 3 ) Resolve, address, or respond to issues raised by the public.
( b ) In determining whether to hold a public meeting, FSA will consider and determine whether: ( 1 ) There is substantial controversy concerning the environmental impact of the proposed action;
( 2 ) There is substantial interest in holding a public meeting;
( 3 ) Another Federal agency or Tribal government has requested a public scoping meeting and their request is warranted; or
( 4 ) The FSA Administrator has determined that a public meeting is needed.
( c ) FSA will publish notice of a public meeting, including the time, date and location of the meeting, in the local media or *Federal Register,* as appropriate, at least 15 days before the first meeting. A notice of a public scoping meeting may be included in a Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS.
( d ) If a NEPA document is to be considered at a public meeting, FSA will make the appropriate documentation available to the public at least 15 days before the meeting.
Case 5:19-cv-00403-TKW-MJF   Document 40-42   Filed 10/13/20   Page 1 of 3

Case 5:19-cv-00403-TKW-MJF   Document 40-42   Filed 10/13/20   Page 2 of 3

Case 5:19-cv-00403-TKW-MJF   Document 40-42   Filed 10/13/20   Page 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                         582,945
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               866,904
<PP&E>                                      21,558,119
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,409,504
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,015,519
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          394,074
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,612,960<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,015,519
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,041,723
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,471,913
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             953,472
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (137,027)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (137,027)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (137,027)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.54)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

<FN>
<F1>This entity is a limited partnership. The Other Stockholders Equity line
    represents total Partnership equity.
<F2>The EPS-Primary line represents net income (loss) per limited partnership
    unit.
</FN>

        


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: N.A., A MINOR

PETITION OF: DEPARTMENT OF

HUMAN SERVICES (DHS)

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 236 EAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

IN THE INTEREST OF: M.A., A MINOR

PETITION OF: DEPARTMENT OF

HUMAN SERVICES (DHS)

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 237 EAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 18th day of June, 2015, the Applications for Leave to File

Post-Submission Communication are GRANTED, and the Petitions for Allowance of

Appeal are DENIED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

Wednesday, December 15, 2010; 2 p.m.—3 p.m.

# PLACE:

Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland.

      ( print page 77624)    

# STATUS:

Closed to the Public.

## Matter To Be Considered

### Compliance Status Report

The Commission staff will brief the Commission on the status of compliance matters. For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, call (301) 504-7948.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

Dated: December 7, 2010.

Todd A. Stevenson,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-31351 Filed 12-9-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 27, 2018

No. 04-18-00563-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF G.V.S., ET AL CHILDREN,

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017-PA-01818

Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal from a trial court’s order terminating appellant mother’s 

parental rights. Appellant mother’s brief was due September 24, 2018. On the due date, 

appellant mother filed a motion for extension of time asking for an additional twenty days in 

which to file her brief. After review, we GRANT appellant mother’s motion and ORDER

appellant mother to file her brief in this court on or before October 15, 2018.

 We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 27th day of September, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3020 

To suspend temporarily the duty on phosphor LAP lanthanum phosphate 

phosphor, activated by cerium and terbium. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 24, 2006 

Mr. REID (for Mr. ROCKEFELLER) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on phosphor LAP lanthanum phosphate phosphor, activated by cerium and 

terbium. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PHOSPHOR LAP LANTHANUM PHOSPHATE 

4 PHOSPHOR, ACTIVATED BY CERIUM AND 

5 TERBIUM. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 3020 IS

‘‘ 9902.32.08 Phosphor LAP lanthanum 

phosphate phosphor, activated by cerium and terbium, inorganic products of 

a kind used as luminophores 

(CAS Nos. 13778–59–1, 

13454–71–2 and 13863–48– 

4 or 95823–34–0) (provided 

for in subheading 

3206.50.00) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
#### Pablo Seda, Appellant, v Port Authority of New York and New Jersey et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

[816 NYS2d 15]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.) entered September 22, 2005, which granted the motion by defendants Port Authority and Koch Skanska for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff’s claims based on New York’s Labor Law were properly dismissed as inapplicable since they are conduct-regulating, and New Jersey, where the accident occurred, has the greater interest in regulating behavior within its borders (see *Padula v Lilarn Props. Corp.,*84 NY2d 519, 522 [1994]; *Florio v Fisher Dev.,*309 AD2d 694, 696 [2003]; *Webber v Mutual Life Ins. Co. of N.Y.,*287 AD2d 369, 370 [2001]). Plaintiff has also failed to make out any claim of negligence under New York or New Jersey law. Indeed, the statements by his expert are entirely conclusory (see *Ventura v Structural Concrete Corp.,*227 AD2d 235 [1996]; *Lynch v Galler Seven-Up Pre-Mix Corp.,*74 NJ 146, 151, 376 A2d 1211, 1213 [1977] [insufficient proffer included expert’s bald, conclusory assertions]; *Smith v Keller Ladder Co.,*275 NJ Super 280, 285, 645 A2d 1269, 1272 [1994] [directed verdict for defendant where plaintiffs expert testified in conclusory terms about defective ladder]), and completely un*306supported by the record. Moreover, the acts of the errant operator in driving while intoxicated, at a high rate of speed, through a gap in the barricades separating his westbound lane of traffic from the eastbound lane that was closed at that time to all but construction workers, was an unforeseeable intervening act breaking the chain of causation of any alleged negligence by defendants *(see Perez v New York Tel. Co.,*161 AD2d 191, 192 [1990]; *Cruz-Mendez v ISU/Ins. Servs. of San Francisco,*156 NJ 556, 575-576, 722 A2d 515, 525 [1999]). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Andrias, Nardelli, Sweeny and McGuire, JJ.
#### § 984.42 Expenses.

The members and their alternates of the Board shall serve without compensation, but shall be allowed their necessary expenses incurred by them in the performance of their duties under this part.

[73 FR 11338, Mar. 3, 2008]
#### § 900.202 Restrictions applicable to Committee personnel.

Members and employees of Federal marketing order boards and committees are immune from prosecution under the United States antitrust laws only insofar as their conduct in administering the respective marketing order is authorized by the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, 7 U.S.C. 601-674, or the provisions of the respective order. Under the antitrust laws, Committee members and employees may not engage in any unauthorized agreement or concerted action that unreasonably restrains United States domestic or foreign commerce. For example, Committee members and employees have no authority to participate, either directly or indirectly, whether on an informal or formal, written or oral basis, in any bilateral or international undertaking or agreement with any competing foreign producer or seller or with any foreign government, agency, or instrumentality acting on behalf of competing foreign producers or sellers to raise, fix, stabilize, or set a floor for commodity prices, or limit the quantity or quality of commodity imported into or exported from the United States. Participation in any such unauthorized agreement or joint undertaking could result in prosecution under the antitrust laws by the United States Department of Justice and/or suit by injured private persons seeking treble damages, and could also result in expulsion of members from the Committee or termination of employment with the Committee.

[80 FR 45396, July 30, 2015]
Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 128 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 128 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 128 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Herbert B. Grimes, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the annual report of Vaughan Foods, Inc., on Form 10-K
  for the annual report period ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in such
  Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Vaughan Foods, Inc.

|                     |  |                                                                                                                                  
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 20, 2008 |  | /s/ Herbert B. GrimesHerbert B. GrimesChairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)

I, Gene P. Jones, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the annual report of Vaughan Foods, Inc., on Form 10-K for
  the annual report period ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in such Form
  10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Vaughan Foods, Inc.

|                     |  |                                                                             
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 20, 2008 |  | /s/ Gene JonesGene JonesChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Vaughan Foods, Inc. and will be retained by Vaughan Foods, Inc. and
  furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and
  Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
  (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.



---
1

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

V. ) Case No.: 2:06mj71-DRB

)

RICHARD FERGUSON )

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

COMES NOW the undersigned counsel, Michael J. Petersen, and enters his appearance on

behalf of Defendant, Richard Ferguson, in the above-styled case.

Dated this 25 day of July 2006. th

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Michael J. Petersen

MICHAEL J. PETERSEN

Assistant Federal Defender

201 Monroe Street, Suite 407

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Phone: (334) 834-2099

Fax: (334) 834-0353

E-mail: michael_petersen@fd.org

ASB-5072-E48M

Case 2:06-mj-00071-DRB Document 6 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

V. ) Case No.: 2:06mj71-DRB

)

RICHARD FERGUSON )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on July 25, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of

Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following: 

Kent Brunson, Esquire

Assistant United States Attorney

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Michael J. Petersen

MICHAEL J. PETERSEN

Assistant Federal Defender

201 Monroe Street, Suite 407

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Phone: (334) 834-2099

Fax: (334) 834-0353

E-mail: michael_petersen@fd.org

ASB-5072-E48M

Case 2:06-mj-00071-DRB Document 6 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 2 of 2