alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2955 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2955

To reduce temporarily the duty on certain women's footwear covering the 
            ankle with coated or laminated textile fabrics.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 23, 2006

  Mr. Carper introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To reduce temporarily the duty on certain women's footwear covering the 
            ankle with coated or laminated textile fabrics.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN WOMEN'S FOOTWEAR COVERING THE ANKLE WITH COATED OR 
              LAMINATED TEXTILE FABRICS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.64.11      Women's footwear,   20%          No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         covering the                                                       31/2009
                         ankle, valued
                         over $20/pair
                         designed to be
                         worn over, or in
                         lieu of, other
                         footwear as a
                         protection
                         against water,
                         oil, grease or
                         chemicals or cold
                         or inclement
                         weather where
                         such protection
                         includes
                         protection
                         against water
                         that is imparted
                         by the use of a
                         coated or
                         laminated textile
                         fabric (except
                         footwear with
                         waterproof
                         injection molded
                         bottoms, i.e.
                         comprising a
                         complete outer
                         sole and all or
                         part of the
                         upper) (provided
                         in subheading
                         6404.19.20)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
Guidance Software, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies that:



| | (i) | the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                                                           
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | 
|Dated: March 3, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/    VICTOR T.
LIMONGELLI                               
|                     |  |  |  | Victor T. Limongelli President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (Section 906), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to Guidance Software, Inc. and will be retained by Guidance Software, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
217.7505 Limitations on price increases.       This section provides implementing guidance for Section 1215 of Pub. L. 98-94 (10 U.S.C. 2452 note).          (a)  The contracting officer shall not award, on a sole source basis, a contract for any centrally managed replenishment part when the price of the part has increased by 25 percent or more over the most recent 12-month period.          (1)  Before computing the percentage difference between the current price and the prior price, adjust for quantity, escalation, and other factors necessary to achieve comparability.          (2)  Departments and agencies may specify an alternate percentage or percentages for contracts at or below the simplified acquisition threshold.          (b)  The contracting officer may award a contract for a part, the price of which exceeds the limitation in paragraph (a) of this section, if the contracting officer certifies in writing to the head of the contracting activity before award that—          (1)  The contracting officer has evaluated the price of the part and concluded that the price increase is fair and reasonable; or          (2)  The national security interests of the United States require purchase of the part despite the price increase.          (c)  The fact that a particular price has not exceeded the limitation in paragraph (a) of this section does not relieve the contracting officer of the responsibility for obtaining a fair and reasonable price.          (d)  Contracting officers may include a provision in sole source solicitations requiring that the offeror supply with its proposal, price and quantity data on any government orders for the replenishment part issued within the most recent 12 months.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 217.75 - ACQUISITION OF REPLENISHMENT PARTS
§ 718.111 Notice of measured acreage. ( a ) FSA will provide notice of measured acreage and mail it to the farm operator. This notice constitutes notice to all parties who have ownership, leasehold interest, or other interest in such farm.
( b ) [Reserved]
[80 FR 41996, July 16, 2015]
252.215-7003 Requirement for Submission of

Data Other Than Certified Cost or Pricing

Data—Canadian Commercial Corporation.

As prescribed at 215.408 (2)(i), use the following provision:

REQUIREMENT FOR SUBMISSION OF DATA OTHER THAN CERTIFIED COST OR PRICING

DATA—CANADIAN COMMERCIAL CORPORATION (JUL 2012)

(a) Submission of certified cost or pricing data is not required.

(b) Canadian Commercial Corporation shall obtain and provide the following:

(i) Profit rate or fee (as applicable).

(ii) Analysis provided by Public Works and Government Services Canada to the Canadian

Commercial Corporation to determine a fair and reasonable price (comparable to the analysis

required at FAR 15.404-1).

(iii) Data other than certified cost or pricing data necessary to permit a determination by the U.S.

Contracting Officer that the proposed price is fair and reasonable [U.S. Contracting Officer to insert

description of the data required in accordance with FAR 15.403-3(a)(1)].

(c) As specified in FAR 15.403-3(a)(4), an offeror who does not comply with a requirement to submit

data that the U.S. Contracting Officer has deemed necessary to determine price reasonableness or

cost realism is ineligible for award unless the head of the contracting activity determines that it is in

the best interest of the Government to make the award to that offeror.

(End of provision)

Parent topic: 252.215 RESERVED
#### § 927.7 Handler.

*Handler* is synonymous with shipper and means any person (except a common or contract carrier transporting pears owned by another person) who, as owner, agent, broker, or otherwise, ships or handles pears, or causes pears to be shipped or handled by rail, truck, boat, or any other means whatsoever.
#### § 923.24 Failure to nominate.

If nominations are not made within the time and in the manner prescribed in § 923.22, the Secretary may, without regard to nominations, select the members and alternate members of the committee on the basis of the representation provided for in § 923.20.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

LARRYEL WILLIAMS,

D.O.C. # R31768,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:21cv33–WS/MAF

STATE OF FLORIDA, et al,

Defendants.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF

No. 4) docketed March 2, 2021. The magistrate judge recommends that this case be

dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and to comply with a court

order. Plaintiff’s copy of the report and recommendation has been returned to the

court with the envelope marked “Released.” Although it is his responsibility to do

so, he has not filed a notice of change of address.

Upon review of the record, this court has determined that the report and

recommendation should be adopted.

Case 4:21-cv-00033-WS-MAF Document 6 Filed 04/01/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF No.4) is adopted

and incorporated by reference in this order of the court.

2. Plaintiff’s complaint and this action are hereby DISMISSED without

prejudice for failure to prosecute and to comply with a court order.

3. The clerk is directed to enter judgment, stating: "All claims are dismissed

without prejudice."

DONE AND ORDERED this 1st day of April , 2021.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:21-cv-00033-WS-MAF Document 6 Filed 04/01/21 Page 2 of 2
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3254 

To suspend temporarily the duty on parts for use in the manufacture of 

certain high-performance loudspeakers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 26, 2006 

Mr. ALEXANDER (for himself and Mr. FRIST) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on parts for use in the 

manufacture of certain high-performance loudspeakers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PARTS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF 

4 CERTAIN HIGH-PERFORMANCE LOUD5 SPEAKERS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 3254 IS 

‘‘ 9902.85.18 Parts for use in the manufacture of loudspeakers that, when not mounted in their 

enclosures, meet a performance standard 

of not more than 1.5 dB for the average 

level of 3 or more octave bands, when 

such loudspeakers are tested in a reverberant chamber (provided for in subheading 8518.90.80) ................................ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
#### § 900.356 Listing of qualified associations.

A copy of each determination of qualification is furnished to the respective association. Copies are also filed in the Dairy Division, Agricultural Marketing Service, and with the Hearing Clerk, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC 20250, where they are available for public inspection. A list of qualified associations engaged in marketing milk under a particular milk marketing order is maintained at the office of the market administrator of the order.
# L_2017049DE.01005002.xml

| 25.2.2017 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 49/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2017

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 49/50

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 800/2013 der Kommission vom 14. August 2013 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 965/2012 zur Festlegung technischer Vorschriften und von Verwaltungsverfahren in Bezug auf den Flugbetrieb gemäß der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 216/2008 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 227 vom 24. August 2013
  )

Auf Seite 62, Anhang IV zur Änderung des Anhangs VII Teilabschnitt D Abschnitt 1 der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 965/2012, Punkt NCO.IDE.A.160 Buchstabe a:

Anstatt:

„Flugzeuge außer Reisemotorseglern (Touring Motor Gliders, TMG) und ELA1-Flugzeuge müssen mit mindestens einem Handfeuerlöscher ausgerüstet sein:“

muss es heißen:

„Flugzeuge, ausgenommen Reisemotorsegler (Touring Motor Gliders, TMG) und ELA1-Flugzeuge, müssen mit mindestens einem Handfeuerlöscher ausgerüstet sein:“.

---
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76412-76415]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30729]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal Nos. 10-69]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Defense Security Cooperation Agency, Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 
601-3740.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a copy of a letter to the 
Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittals 10-69 with 
attached transmittal, and policy justification.

    Dated: December 1, 2010.
Morgan F. Park,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P

[[Page 76413]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN08DE10.016


[[Page 76414]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN08DE10.017


[[Page 76415]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN08DE10.018

[FR Doc. 2010-30729 Filed 12-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
#### § 958.17 Container.

*Container* means a sack, box, bag, crate, hamper, basket, carton, package, or any other type of receptacle used in the packaging, transportation, sale, shipment or other handling of onions.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Golden Star Resource Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Steven Bergstrom, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   
|    | Dated this 14thday of October, 2008.                                                                                                                 
|   

STEVEN BERGSTROMSteven BergstromChief Executive Officer

























---
2013 Trade Policy Agenda

and

2012 Annual Report

of the President of the United States

on the Trade Agreements Program

Ambassador Ronald Kirk

Office of the United States Trade Representative
Foreword

The 2013 Trade Policy Agenda and 2012 Annual Report of the President of the United States on 

the Trade Agreements Program are submitted to the Congress pursuant to Section 163 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2213). Chapter II and Annex II of this document meet 

the requirements of Sections 122 and 124 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act with respect to 

the World Trade Organization. In addition, the report also includes an annex listing trade 

agreements entered into by the United States since 1984. Trade data for 2012, where listed, are 

annualized based on January to November data. Services data by country are only available 

through 2011.

The Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) is responsible for the preparation 

of this report. U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk gratefully acknowledges in particular the 

contributions of Deputy U.S. Trade Representatives Demetrios Marantis, Michael Punke, and 

Miriam Sapiro; USTR General Counsel Timothy Reif; Chief of Staff Lisa Garcia; and Assistant 

USTR for Public/Media Affairs Carol Guthrie, Senior Policy Advisor Holly Smith, Senior 

Advisor David Roth, and Director of Speechwriting Jeremy Sturchio. Thanks are extended to 

partner Executive Branch agencies, including the Environmental Protection Agency and the 

Departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Health and Human Services, Justice, Labor, State, and 

Treasury. Ambassador Kirk would also like to thank Diana Friedman, Jeffrey Horowitz, and 

Jeffrey Schlandt for their contributions.

March 2013
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

Civil Hearing Minutes

Honorable Lacey A. Collier, Senior U.S. District Judge

Case Style: In RE: Skanska USA Civil Southeast Inc and Skanska USA Inc. 

Case No.: 3:20-cv-5980-LAC-HTC

Hearing: Status Conference Re: ECF1146 and ECF1147

__________________________________________________________________

Time Commenced: 9:59 a.m. Time Concluded: 11:09 a.m.

Court Reporter: Julie Wycoff

Attorney present for Petitioners:

Jeremy Branning, Esquire

Attorneys present for Respondents/Claimants:

Thomas Gonzalez, Esquire; Sam Geisler, Esquire; Brian Barr, Esquire; Stephen Echsner, Esquire; 

Eric Stevenson, Esquire; Greg Fayard, Esquire; Thomas Gore, Esquire; Douglas Woodward, 

Esquire; Robert Kelly, AUSA, DOJ; Jeff Gill, Esquire. 

______________________________________________________________________________

PROCEEDINGS:

9:59 a.m. Court in session.

10:01 a.m. Jeremy Branning argument on Skanska’s position on continuing the September 13 

trial based upon outstanding and ongoing discovery issues.

10:03 a.m. Court makes an inquiry of Mr. Branning.

Mr. Branning responds. 

10:09 a.m. Court makes an inquiry of Mr. Branning.

Mr. Branning responds and continues.

10:11 a.m. Brian Barr on behalf of Claimants represented by Levin Papantonio Raffery, and

Aylstock Witkin Kreis & Overholtz states Claimants are prepared and ready for June 

21, 2021 evidentiary hearing. Argues in support of a continuance of the September 

13 trial.

10:16 a.m. Court makes an inquiry of Mr. Barr.

Mr. Barr responds. 

10:17 a.m. Mr. Barr presents a written document titled “Litigation Timeline.” Document 

published to the courtroom.

10:23 a.m. Court makes an inquiry of Mr. Barr.

Mr. Barr responds. 

Case 3:20-cv-05980-LC-HTC Document 1158 Filed 05/19/21 Page 1 of 2
10:27 a.m. Jeff Gill on behalf of Claimant DeLuna Oyster Company. Claimant objects to 

continuance. Argues objection as to continuance.

10:30 a.m. Robert Kelly, AUSA, DOJ. Argument for continuance of the September 13 trial 

based upon late notice of this action and discovery issues. 

10:36 a.m. Court makes an inquiry of Mr. Kelly. 

Mr. Kelly responds and continues.

10:44 a.m. Sam Geisler on behalf of claimants represented by Aylstock, Witkin, Kreis & 

Overholtz argues for continuance of the September 13 trial based upon discovery 

issues. 

10:46 a.m. Court makes an inquiry of Mr. Barr. 

Mr. Barr responds.

10:51 a.m. Mr. Branning responds to statements made in the arguments of counsel for 

claimants/respondents.

10:55 a.m. Court makes an inquiry of Mr. Branning.

Mr. Branning responds.

10:57 a.m. Court readdresses Mr. Kelly. 

Mr. Kelly responds.

11:05 a.m. The Court addresses all counsel. 

The Court will maintain the September 13, 2021 trial date in this case.

11:09 a.m. Court is adjourned.

__________________ 

Filed in Open Court

May 19, 2021

Deputy Clerk: kli

Case 3:20-cv-05980-LC-HTC Document 1158 Filed 05/19/21 Page 2 of 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Hector Rincon, Appellant.

Submitted September 17, 2007;

decided October 11, 2007

Reported below, 40 AD3d 539.

Motion for an extension of the time within which to apply for permission to appeal pursuant to CPL 460.20 granted and motion papers treated as a timely CPL 460.20 application.
§ 927.65 Exemption from regulation. ( a ) Nothing contained in this subpart shall limit or authorize the limitation of shipment of pears for consumption by charitable institutions or distribution by relief agencies, nor shall any assessment be computed on pears so shipped. The Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee may prescribe regulations to prevent pears shipped for either of such purposes from entering commercial channels of trade contrary to the provisions of this subpart.
( b ) The Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee may prescribe rules and regulations, to become effective upon the approval of the Secretary, whereby quantities of pears or types of pear shipments may be exempted from any or all provisions of this subpart.
52.246-11 Higher-Level Contract Quality Requirement.       As prescribed in 46.311, insert the following clause:          Higher-Level Contract Quality Requirement (Dec 2014)                                       (a) 						            The Contractor shall comply with the higher-level quality standard(s) listed below.                ______________________________________________________[*Contracting Officer insert the title, number (if any), date, and tailoring (if any) of the higher-level quality standards*.]                                          (b) 						            The Contractor shall include applicable requirements of the higher-level quality standard(s) listed in paragraph (a) of this clause and the requirement to flow down such standards, as applicable, to lower-tier subcontracts, in-                                                         (1) 								                Any subcontract for critical and complex items (see 46.203(b) and (c)); or                                                            (2) 								                When the technical requirements of a subcontract require-                                                                           (i) 										                    Control of such things as design, work operations, in-process control, testing, and inspection; or                                                                              (ii) 										                    Attention to such factors as organization, planning, work instructions, documentation control, and advanced metrology.                                                                                                                   (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.246 [Reserved]