alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Marjorie MEYERS, by Next Friend Edgar C. BENZING, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated; Helen Elkin, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated; Ruth H. Davis, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated; Phillip Greenberg, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. State of TEXAS; Texas Department of Transportation; William G. Burnett, Executive Director of the Texas Department of Transportation, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-50452.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 29, 2006.

*504J. Hampton Skelton, Skelton, Woody & Arnold, Austin, TX, Charles R. Shaddox, Shaddox, Compere, Walraven & Good, San Antonio, TX, Stephen R. Senn (argued), Peterson *&*Myers, Lakeland, FL, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Sarah Elaine Harrington, Jessica Dun-say Silver, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civil Rights Div.-Appellate Section, Washington, DC, for Intervenor United States.

Lisa Royce Eskow (argued), Weil, Gotshal & Manges, Austin, TX, Ranee Lamar Craft, Amy Warr, Austin, TX, for Defendants-Appellees.

James C. Harrington, Texas Civil Rights Project, Austin, TX, for Amici Curiae.

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

DENNIS, Circuit Judge:

Treating the Petition for Rehearing En Banc as a Petition for Panel Rehearing, the Petition for Panel Rehearing is DENIED. No member of the panel nor judge in regular active service of the court having requested that the court be polled on Rehearing En Banc (Fed R.App. P. and 5th Cir. R. 35), the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.

The narrow holding in the instant case is that, under the Supreme Court’s decision in *Lapides v. Bd. of Regents of University System of Georgia,*535 U.S. 613, 122 S.Ct. 1640, 152 L.Ed.2d 806 (2002), when a State removes to federal court a private state court suit based on a federal-law claim, it invokes federal jurisdiction and thus waives its unqualified right to object peremptorily to the federal district court’s jurisdiction on the ground of state sovereign immunity. However, that waiver does not affect or limit the State’s ability to assert whatever rights, immunities or defenses are provided for by its own sovereign immunity law to defeat the claims against the State finally and on their merits in the federal courts. In sum, Texas may assert its state sovereign immunity as defined by its own law as a defense against the plaintiffs’ claims in the federal courts, but it may not use it to defeat federal jurisdiction or as a return ticket back to the state court system. Additionally, the panel opinion does not reach or decide, but remands for further proceedings, the issues of whether the ADA Title II on its face or as applied constitutionally abrogates the State’s sovereign immunity; whether the plaintiffs failed to state a claim based on a violation of Title II or the regulation; whether the regulation sued upon is invalid under *Chevron USA Inc. v. NRDC,*467 U.S. 837, 104 S.Ct. 2778, 81 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984); and whether the Commerce Clause authorizes the enactment of ADA Title II.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ParticleDrilling Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jim B. Terry, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)            TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)            Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/  JIM B. TERRY         |            |   |
|---------------------------|-----------------|--------|
| Jim  B. Terry             |            |   |
| *Chief Executive Officer* |            |   |
| * *                  |            |   |
| Date:                     | August  9, 2006 |   |
|                           |                 |        |  |  |  |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Particle DrillingTechnologies, Inc. and will be retained by Particle DrillingTechnologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

----
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3246 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3246

           To suspend temporarily the duty on Tetraconazole.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 26, 2006

Mr. Frist (for Mrs. Dole) introduced the following bill; which was read 
             twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To suspend temporarily the duty on Tetraconazole.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TETRACONAZOLE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.11.15        1-[2-(2,4-              Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           dichlorophenyl)-3-                                                31/2009          ''
                           (1,1,2,2-                                                                           .
                           tetrafluoroethoxy)pro
                           pyl]-1H-1,2,4-
                           triazole
                           (Tetraconazole) (CAS
                           No. 112281-77-3)
                           (provided for in
                           subheading
                           2933.99.22)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
|   | 1. |   | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                           |
|--------|----|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 2. |   | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

| April 14, 2011  | /s/ Leroy D. Nott       |                                                                                        |
|----------------------|------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                 | Name:              | Leroy D. Nott                                                                          |   |
|                 | Title:             | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)                                  |   |
|                 |                         |                                                                                        |
| April 14, 2011  | /s/ Scott D. Olmstead   |                                                                                        |
|                 | Name:              | Scott D. Olmstead                                                                      |   |
|                 | Title:             | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and PrincipalAccounting Officer)  |   |
Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 8 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 8 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 8 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 3 of 3
§ 927.123 Interest and late payment charges. Payments received more than 45 days after the date on which they are due shall be considered delinquent and subject to a late payment charge of $25.00 or 2 percent of the total due, whichever is greater. Payments received more than 60 days after the date on which they are due shall be subject to a 11 ⁄ 2 percent interest charge per month, until final payment is made and interest shall be applied to the total unpaid balance, including the late payment charge and any accumulated interest. Any amount paid shall be credited when the payment is received in the Fresh Pear Committee or Processed Pear Committee office. [70 FR 59625, Oct. 13, 2005, as amended at 71 FR 7676, Feb. 14, 2006]
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Authority:

7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 810.306 Nongrade requirements.

*Glucosinolates.* Content of glucosinolates in canola is determined according to procedures prescribed in FGIS instructions.
Exhibit 32.1




Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Global Health Ventures Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended May 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Hassan Salari, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:


/s/ Hassan Salari


Hassan Salari


Chief Executive Officer




February 8, 2011
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 60 Filed 06/25/2007 Page 1 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 60 Filed 06/25/2007 Page 2 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 60 Filed 06/25/2007 Page 3 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 60 Filed 06/25/2007 Page 4 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 60 Filed 06/25/2007 Page 5 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 60 Filed 06/25/2007 Page 6 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 60 Filed 06/25/2007 Page 7 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 60 Filed 06/25/2007 Page 8 of 8
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,743
<ALLOWANCES>                                        15
<INVENTORY>                                     18,256
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,097
<PP&E>                                           8,335
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,429
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  36,421
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,192
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           125
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,259
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    36,421
<SALES>                                         10,852
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,852
<CGS>                                            7,118
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,809
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,101
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 340
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,101)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (440)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (661)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (661)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3063 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3063

  To extend the patent term for the badge of the Sons of the American 
                    Legion, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

  Mr. Talent introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the patent term for the badge of the Sons of the American 
                    Legion, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PATENT TERM EXTENSION FOR THE BADGE OF THE SONS OF THE 
              AMERICAN LEGION.

    The term of a certain design patent numbered 92,187 (for the badge 
of the Sons of the American Legion) is renewed and extended for a 
period of 14 years beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, with 
all the rights and privileges pertaining to such patent.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

RICHARD MARSHALL, ) 

)

Plaintiff, )

 ) CIV. ACT. NO. 2:06cv701-ID

v. )

)

CHRIS WEST, et al., ) 

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

Upon CONSIDERATION of the unopposed Motion to Continue Trial (Doc. No. 42),

filed May 12, 2008, and for good cause shown, it is ORDERED that the trial of this cause,

presently set on June 23, 2008, be and the same is hereby CONTINUED to the term of court

commencing on October 20, 2008, in Montgomery, Alabama.

It is further CONSIDERED and ORDERED that the pretrial hearing of this cause, 

presently set on May 20, 2008, is hereby CANCELLED and CONTINUED until further

order of the court.

The deadlines in sections 9, 10, 11, 13 and 14 of the Uniform Scheduling Order (Doc.

No. 22) are adjusted to conform with the new trial date. Otherwise, the deadlines in the

Uniform Scheduling Order shall remain in full force and effect.

DONE this 19 day of May, 2008. th

/s/ Ira DeMent 

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00701-ID-CSC Document 48 Filed 05/19/2008 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

NICHOLAS STRICKLAND, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) Case No. 1:06-cv-682-TFM

)

CHAMPION HOME BUILDERS CO., INC. )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

Upon of review of Champion Home Builders Co.’s Motion to Exclude Testimony and

Opinions of Plaintiffs’ Expert Bobby Parks and Request for In Limine Hearing (Doc. 65,

filed March 28, 2008) and Chamption Home Builders Co.’s Motion to Exclude Testimony

and Opinions of Plaintiffs’ Expert Robert Kondner and Request for In Limine Hearing (Doc.

66, filed March 28, 2008), it is ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall file a response on or before

April 23, 2008. 

The parties are further advised that they are required to submit a paper courtesy copy

of briefs and supporting evidence to the Chambers of the undersigned. For those

submissions (including briefs and evidentiary materials) that exceed twenty-five (25) pages,

the courtesy copy shall be bound in a three-ring binder and tabbed. 

It is further ORDERED that the parties appear for a HEARING on the above

referenced motions on May 13, 2008 at 9:00 a.m. The hearing shall be heard in District

Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 67 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Courtroom 4A, Frank M. Johnson, Jr. United States Courthouse Complex, One Church

Street, Montgomery, Alabama. The hearing shall be attended by at least one of the attorneys

representing each of the parties. 

 DONE this 31st day of March, 2008.

 /s/Terry F. Moorer

TERRY F. MOORER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 67 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 2 of 2
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Authority:

7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 868.22 Withdrawal of request for inspection service by applicant.

An applicant may withdraw a request for inspection service any time before official personnel release results, either verbally or in writing. Reimbursement of expenses, if any, shall be made pursuant to § 868.26.

[53 FR 3722, Feb. 9, 1988. Redesignated and amended at 60 FR 16364, Mar. 30, 1995]
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

LONNIE CAMMON, #236498, )

)

 Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06-CV-674-WKW

)

DOCTOR SEDIET, et al., )

)

 Defendants )

ORDER 

Upon consideration of the motion for extension of time filed by the defendants on

September 26, 2006 (Court Doc. No. 17), and for good cause, it is 

ORDERED that this motion be and is hereby GRANTED. It is further

ORDERED that the defendants be GRANTED an extension from September 26,

2006 to and including October 26, 2006 to file their special report and answer. 

The defendants are cautioned that no further extensions of time will be allowed

unless they establish exceptional circumstances which warrant such action. 

Done this 27th day of September, 2006.

/s/ Delores R. Boyd

DELORES R. BOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00674-WKW-TFM Document 18 Filed 09/27/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 204 Filed 04/19/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 204 Filed 04/19/2007 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

 SOUTHERN DIVISION

ROGER WRIGHT, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Case No. 1:06-cv-0647-WKW

 )

PEMCO WORLD AIR SERVICES, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the pretrial conference is continued from December 7, 2007, until

December 17, 2007 at 10:00 a.m. in the chambers of the undersigned at the Frank M. Johnson

United States Courthouse in Montgomery, Alabama.

DONE this 21st day of November, 2007.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00647-WKW-SRW Document 37 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### § 981.12 Grower.

*Grower* is synonymous with *producer* and means any person engaging, in a proprietary capacity, in the commercial production of almonds.
March 19,2015

DEMETRIUS WILLIAMS

TDCJ-ID #1824940

ALFRED HUGHES UNIT

Rt.2 Box 4400

GATESVILLE,TX. 76597

Clerk of Court of Criminal Appeals

Mr.Abel Acosta

P.O.Box 12308

Austin,Texas 78711

RE:State of Texas V.

Cause No.1308742

Demetrius Williams

Appellate NO.01-12-01084-CR

COURTOF(mmtLNfmB

2 5 2015

AMAeo6te,ctofc

Dear Clerk/

I am writing in regards to information concerning the dates I filed for

extentions to file a Petition for Discretionary Review with the Court of

Criminal Appeals.

The First District Court of Appeals Affirmed my conviction in an unpublished

opinion on January 7,2014.Williams V. State,No.01-12-01084-CR,2014 WL 60723,

at *3,Mandate of affirmance was issued on May 2,2014.

I wrote the Court of Criminal Appeals requesting an extension of time to file

my PDR 2 times and both times it was granted but I could not do so because

I was benched warranted to a county that I had no access to the law library/

therefore,I failed to file one sir.At this point I've exhausted all of my

state remedies in that regard,and I am in need of the following information:

l)The dates I requested the extension to file my PDR and

2)The dates I was granted extensions to file my PDR.

Your cooperation concerning this matter shall be highly appreciated sir.

Thank You,

Demetrius Williams
Subpart 1324.1 - Protection of Individual

Privacy

Parent topic: PART 1324 - PROTECTION OF PRIVACY AND FREEDOM OF INFORMATION

1324.103 Procedures.

DOC rules implementing the Privacy Act of 1974 are described in 15 CFR Part 4.
Exhibit 4.2


 


 


 




     


     


    

 


IOVANCE BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.


 


The Corporation is authorized to issue 200,000,000
shares, consisting of 150,000,000 shares of Common Stock, $0.000041666 par value per share, and 50,000,000 shares of Preferred
Stock, $0.001 par value per share.


 


The Corporation will furnish without charge
to each stockholder requesting the same a statement of the designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other
special rights of each class of stock or series thereof, and of the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such preferences
and/or rights.


 


The following abbreviations, when used in
the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable
laws or regulations:


 





	TEN COM - as tenants in common	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT -	....................Custodian....................
	TEN ENT  - as tenants by the entireties	 	      (Cust)
                 (Minor)
	JT TEN     - as joint tenants with right of	 	under Uniform Gifts to Minors
	 survivorship and not as tenants	 	Act ...................................................
	 in common	 	(State)




 


Additional abbreviations may also be used
though not in the above list.


 


For Value Received, _______________________________hereby sell, assign and
transfer unto


 


	PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER	 
	IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE	 
	 	 
	 	 


 


 





 



(PLEASE
PRINT OR TYPE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE)


 


 



 


 





 






 





	 	Shares
	of the stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint
	 
	 	Attorney
	to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.




 


Dated __________________


 


	 	 
	 	NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE
    TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE
    IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER.


 


Signature(s) Guaranteed


 


	By	 	 
	The Signature(s) must be guaranteed by an eligible guarantor institution

(Banks, Stockbrokers, Savings and Loan Associations and Credit Unions

with membership in an approved Signature Guarantee Medallion Program),

pursuant to SEC Rule 17Ad-15.


 


	 
	COLUMBIA PRINTING SERVICES, LLC - www.stockinformation.com
#### § 905.18 Improved No. 2 grade and Improved No. 2 Bright grade.

*Improved No. 2 grade* and *Improved No. 2 Bright grade* means grapefruit meeting all of the respective requirements of the U.S. No. 2 grade and the U.S. No. 2 Bright grade and those requirements of the U.S. No. 1 grade relating to shape (form) and color, as such requirements are set forth in the U.S. Standards for Grades of Florida Grapefruit (§§ 51.750-51.783 of this title) or as such standards may hereafter be amended.

[31 FR 15060, Dec. 1, 1966. Redesignated at 42 FR 59368, Nov. 17, 1977]