alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 232 / Friday, December 3, 2010 / Presidential Documents 75615 

Proclamation 8608 of November 30, 2010 

Helsinki Human Rights Day, 2010 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

This year marks the 35th anniversary of the Helsinki Final Act, a seminal 

document tying lasting security among states with respect for human rights 

and fundamental freedoms within states. With the signing of the Act on 

August 1, 1975, the United States, Canada, the Soviet Union, and the countries of a divided Europe solemnly pledged to work together to realize 

comprehensive security across the European continent. This occasion also 

spurred courageous human rights activists in Eastern Europe to form citizens’ 

groups to press for the implementation of commitments their governments 

had made, launching the Helsinki movement. 

The guiding principles set forth 35 years ago in the Helsinki Final Act, 

now institutionalized in the Organization for Security and Cooperation in 

Europe (OSCE), still serve as a beacon to all who strive for freedom and 

peace across the Euro-Atlantic region. On this day, we reaffirm our sincere 

belief that security is indivisible, and must be rooted in confidence, cooperation, transparency, and respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. 

We also recommit to calling on fellow participating states to reexamine 

their compliance with their OSCE commitments. 

The Helsinki Final Act, with its affirmation of fundamental human rights, 

inspired many who struggled against repressive regimes and for human 

dignity. Today, a new generation of brave women and men work tirelessly— 

often risking their lives—to realize those same rights. We stand with them 

and with all who advocate for the rights of their fellow citizens and for 

the betterment of their societies. 

Together, we will ensure the United States continues to serve as an example 

in both word and deed to the Helsinki principles. As President Gerald 

Ford said to his fellow signatories at the signing of the Helsinki Final 

Act, history will judge us ‘‘not by the promises we make, but by the promises 

we keep.’’ 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim December 1, 2010, 

as Helsinki Human Rights Day. I call upon all the people of the United 

States to observe this day with appropriate ceremonies and activities. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES5
75616 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 232 / Friday, December 3, 2010 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this thirtieth day 

of November, in the year of our Lord two thousand ten, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-fifth. 

[FR Doc. 2010–30584 

Filed 12–2–10; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 3195–W1–P 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES5OB#1.EPS</GPH>
#### § 906.21 Redistricting.

The committee may recommend, and pursuant thereto the Secretary may approve, the reapportionment of members among districts, the reapportionment of members between grower and handler members representing cooperative marketing organizations and independent grower and independent handler members, and the re-establishment of districts within the production area. In recommending such changes, the committee shall give consideration to: (a) Shifts in production; (b) the importance of new production in its relation to existing districts; (c) the equitable relationship of committee membership and districts; (d) changes in amount of fruit handled by cooperative marketing organizations in relation to fruit handled by independent handlers; and (e) other relevant factors. No changes in districting or in apportionment of members may become effective in less than 30 days prior to the date on which terms of office begin each year and no recommendations for such redistricting or reapportionment may be made less than six months prior to such date.
#### John F. White et al., Respondents, v. Long Island Lighting Co., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff Appellant-Respondent, et al., Defendants. Champion Construction and Engineering Co., Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered November 16, 1967, affirmed, with one bill of costs against both appellants, jointly. In this action to recover damages for personal injuries and wrongful death, it is clear from the testimony and the language of the contracts between appellant Long Island Lighting Co. (“Lilco ”) and the several contractors engaged at the construction site where the accident occurred that the former was the owner and general contractor at the site and, as such, owed the employees of the latter, including plaintiffs, the nondelegable duty to provide a safe place to work (Labor Law, § 200; see *Seigel*v. *Prima Concrete Constr. Corp.,*27 A D 2d 946). Included therein was the detection of dangers discoverable by reasonable diligence. In our opinion, plaintiffs offered sufficient proof for the *793jury to find (1) that Lileo breached that duty by failing to discover and alleviate a dangerous condition, to wit, hanger rods extending out from the tenth floor of the building, and (2) that the position of these rods was the proximate cause of the accident. There was not sufficient proof to show the accident may have been caused by the independent negligence of one of the several contractors (see *Olsen*v. *Chase Manhattan Bank,*10 A D 2d 539, affd. 9 N Y 2d 829). As for the third-party action, we agree with the opinion of the learned trial court that the language of the contract between Lileo and plaintiffs’ employer imposed absolute indemnity upon the latter. The language unequivocally expresses an intent to indemnify Lileo even for its own negligence (see *Fuller Co.*v. *Fischbach & Moore,*7 A D 2d 33; see, also, *Stellato*v. *Flagler Park Estates,*11 Misc 2d 413, affd. 6 A D 2d 843). We have examined the other contentions raised by Lileo, including the alleged prejudicial medical testimony and portions of the court’s charge to the jury, and find them to be without merit. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Munder and Martuseello, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3209 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3209

   To suspend temporarily the duty on Ethene, tetrafluoro, oxidized, 
                 polymerized, reduced, decarboxylated.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

Mr. Lautenberg introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on Ethene, tetrafluoro, oxidized, 
                 polymerized, reduced, decarboxylated.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ETHENE, TETRAFLUORO, OXIDIZED, POLYMERIZED, REDUCED, 
              DECARBOXYLATED.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.38.16        Ethene, tetrafluoro,    Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           oxidized,                                                         31/2009          ''
                           polymerized, reduced,                                                               .
                           decarboxylated (CAS
                           No. 161075-02-1)
                           (provided for in
                           subheading
                           3824.90.91)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6356
MICHAEL LEGRAND-BEY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus LLOYD L. WATERS, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-1651-AW) Submitted: May 12, 1998 Decided: June 9, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Legrand-Bey, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Annabelle Louise Lisic, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate ofappealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Legrand-Bey v. Waters , No. CA-97-1651-AW (D. Md. Feb. 11, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

Foreign-Trade Zone 238 was approved by the Foreign-Trade Zones Board on August 5, 1999 (Board Order 1047).

FTZ 238 currently consists of 1 “site” totaling 50 acres in the Dublin area. The current update does not alter the physical boundaries that have previously been approved, but instead involves an administrative renumbering that separates certain non-contiguous sites for recordkeeping purposes.

Under this revision, the site list for FTZ 238 will be as follows: Site 1 (35 acres)—within the New River Valley Airport on VA Route 100, Dublin; and, Site 2 (15 acres)—located at 4100 Bob White Boulevard, Pulaski.

                    For further information, contact Maureen Hinman at                     *maureen.hinman@trade.gov*                     or (202) 482-0627.                

Dated: December 1, 2010.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-31103 Filed 12-9-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
5624.203 Policy.    *(Revised June 2021)*       Each contracting office shall utilize their component's Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) office process. Contracting offices may contact USSOCOM Command Information Services Division FOIA Manager (SOCS-SJS-VI) for additional assistance.              HQ, United States Special Operations Command       Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L)       SOFARS 5624       February 2007 **Parent topic:** Subpart 5624.2 - FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT
#### § 900.36 Words in the singular form.

Words in this subpart in the singular form shall be deemed to import the plural, and vice versa, as the case may demand.
SUBPART 27.90 – TRADEMARK RIGHTS

UNDER GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS

Parent topic: PART 27 –– PATENTS, DATA, AND COPYRIGHTS

27.9000 Definitions.

Trademark is a word, phrase, symbol or design, or a combination that identifies your goods or

services, distinguishes them from the goods or services of others, and indicates the source of your

goods or services.

Service Mark is a word, phrase, symbol or design, or a combination of words, phrases, symbols or

designs, that identifies and distinguishes the source of a service of one party from that of other

parties.

27.9001 Trademark rights under government contracts.

The FAR and DFARS do not address trademark or service mark rights, nor is there an official DoD

policy on ownership of trademarks or service marks first used in performance of a government

contract in connection with goods or services delivered to the Government. Under federal trademark

law, trademark rights generally reside with the entity that controls the nature and quality of the

goods or services that are identified by the trademark.

However, in certain cases, it may be in the Government’s best interest for DISA to own a trademark

or service mark first created under a contract. For example, Government ownership may be desired

for a mark that is to be used exclusively in connection with a government-controlled service that the

contractor manages for DISA. DISA’s Office of the General Counsel should be consulted to

determine if there is a need to negotiate trademark ownership rights with the contractor and seek

federal trademark protection on DISA’s behalf by filing an application to register the trademark or

service mark with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CR NO. 2:06cr178-SRW

) WO

CARRIE J. FLOWERS, )

ORDER ON MOTION

This cause is currently pending before the court on a Motion to Continue filed by the

defendant, Carrie J. Flowers, on November 27, 2006. The motion seeks a continuance of the

trial currently set for January 8, 2007. 

While the granting of a continuance is left to the sound discretion of the trial judge,

United States v. Warren, 772 F.2d 827, 838 (11th Cir. 1985), the court is, of course, limited

by the requirements of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161. The Speedy Trial Act

provides generally that the trial of a defendant in a criminal case shall commence within 70

days of the latter of the filing date of the indictment or the date the defendant appeared before

a judicial officer in such matter. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(c)(1). See United States v. Vasser, 916

F.2d 624 (11th Cir. 1990). 

The Act excludes from this 70 day period any continuance that the judge grants "on

the basis of his findings that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the

best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial." 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A).

The court concludes upon the pleadings and its knowledge of this case that the ends of justice

Case 2:06-cr-00178-SRW Document 14 Filed 11/27/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

will be served by continuing this case to allow defendant's counsel adequate time to prepare,

given a conflict with another proceeding in which he is involved. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion to Continue filed by defendant

Carrie J. Flowers, be GRANTED. This case is reset on the trial term commencing March 12,

2007.

DONE, this 27th day of November, 2006.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00178-SRW Document 14 Filed 11/27/2006 Page 2 of 2
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

WILLIE MCNAIR, )

)

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2:06-cv-695-WKW

)

RICHARD ALLEN, et al., )

)

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. )

____________________________________

)

JAMES CALLAHAN, )

)

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2:06-cv-919-WKW

)

RICHARD ALLEN, et al., )

)

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the pretrial conference in this matter is CONTINUED from August 29,

2007, to September 5, 2007, at 10:00 a.m. (CDT), in Courtroom 2-E. The clerk is DIRECTED to

provide a court reporter.

DONE this 23rd day of August, 2007.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 85 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.12







December 31, 2017


Re:    Renewal of Amended and Restated Retention Agreement
Dear John:
This letter is to serve as your notification that Ply Gem Industries, Inc. has elected to execute its Renewal Term right under your current Amended and Restated Retention Agreement dated December 31, 2008 for a period of one year.  As such, all applicable rights and terms as outlined in your Amended and Restated Retention Agreement will remain in effect through December 31, 2018.
Please sign this letter in the space provided below as your acknowledgment and agreement of this Renewal Term agreement and return this original to me, and retain a copy for your own records.
 	
		
	 
	Sincerely,

	 
	 

	 
	PLY GEM INDUSTRIES, INC.

	 
	 

	 
	By:  /s/ Gary E. Robinette

	 
	Name:  Gary E. Robinette

	 
	Title:  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	Acknowledged and Agreed:
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	/s/ John Buckley
	 

	John Buckley
#### §§ 766.62-766.100 [Reserved]
Case 1:06-mc-03331-MEF-TFM Document 3 Filed 07/31/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-mc-03331-MEF-TFM Document 3 Filed 07/31/2006 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 39-3 Filed 05/31/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 39-3 Filed 05/31/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### § 51.2007 Moldy.

*Moldy* means that there is a visible growth of mold either on the outside or the inside of the kernel.
Case 2:06-cv-00639-WKW-TFM Document 25 Filed 01/04/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00639-WKW-TFM Document 25 Filed 01/04/2007 Page 2 of 2
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3227 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain twisted yarn of viscose rayon. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. MENENDEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain twisted yarn 

of viscose rayon. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN TWISTED YARN OF VISCOSE RAYON. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.54.04 Single yarn of viscose rayon, with a twist 

exceeding 120 turns/m (provided for in 

subheading 5403.32.00) .......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•S 3227 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
§ 945.122 Application. ( a ) Application for a Certificate of Privilege shall be made on forms furnished by the committee. Each application may contain, but need not be limited to, the name and address of the handler; the quantity by grade, size, quality and variety of the potatoes to be shipped; the mode of transportation; the consignee; the destination; the purpose for which the potatoes are to be used; a certification to the United States Department of Agriculture and to the committee as to the truthfulness of the information shown thereon; and any other appropriate information or documents deemed necessary by the committee or its duly authorized agents for the purpose stated in § 945.120.
( b ) The committee may require each handler making shipments of potatoes for export to include with his application a copy of the Department of Commerce Shipper's Export Declaration Form No. 7525-V applicable to such shipment.
#### § 7.3 Definitions.

The following definitions apply to this part. The definitions in § 718.2 of this title also apply to this part, except where they conflict with the definitions in this section.

*Cooperate* means to enroll a farming operation or agricultural property with a county office.

*Deputy Administrator* means Deputy Administrator for Field Operations, Farm Service Agency, U.S. Department of Agriculture or the designee.

*Local administrative area* means an elective area for FSA committees in a single county or multi-county jurisdiction.

*Participate* means to receive assistance, services, or benefits directly from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), or from USDA indirectly through another governmental agency.

*Socially disadvantaged farmer or rancher* is an individual or entity who is a member of a group whose members have been subject to racial, ethnic, or gender prejudice because of their identity as members of a group without regard to their individual qualities. These groups consist of: American Indians or Alaskan Natives, Asians, Blacks or African Americans, Native Hawaiians or other Pacific Islanders, Hispanics, and women.

*State committee* means the FSA State committee.

*Uniform Guidelines* means the Uniform Guidelines for Conducting Farm Service Agency County Committee Elections, which are available in FSA Handbook 15-AO.
Exhibit 10.4

 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE

TABULA RASA HEALTHCARE, INC.

ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN

 

WHEREAS, Tabula Rasa Healthcare, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Tabula Rasa Healthcare, Inc. Annual Incentive Plan (the “Plan”);

 

WHEREAS, the Committee has decided to amend the Plan to allow payment of awards under the Plan in the form of equity or other consideration; and

 

WHEREAS, Section 9 of the Plan provides that the Committee may amend the Plan at any time.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows, effective January 1, 2018:

 

1.                                      Section 7 (“Payment of Awards”) of the Plan is amended in its entirety as follows:

 

A Participant’s Award shall be paid in cash, equity, or such other form of consideration determined by the Committee in its sole discretion, or a combination of the foregoing, as soon as administratively practicable after the end of the Performance Period.  To the extent a Participant obtains a “legally binding right” (within the meaning of Code Section 409A) to his or her Award, such Award shall be paid as soon as practicable after, and no later than, March 15th following the end of the calendar year in which the Award is no longer subject to a “substantial risk of forfeiture” (within the meaning of Code Section 409A).

 

2.                                      In all respects not modified by this Amendment, the Plan is hereby ratified and confirmed.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Committee has caused this First Amendment to the Plan to be adopted as of this 26th day of February, 2018.