alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

*************

MAY’S DISTRIBUTING CO. INC., *

* Civ. Action No. 2:06-CV-702

Plaintiff, *

* Judge Fuller

vs. *

*

TOTAL CONTAINMENT, INC., ET AL *

*

Defendants * JURY TRIAL REQUESTED

*************

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DEFENDANTS’ SUR-REPLY 

MEMORANDUM IN RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S

REPLY BRIEF ON THE ISSUE OF REMAND

NOW INTO COURT, through undersigned counsel, come Defendants, Dayco 

Products, LLC and Mark IV Industries, Ltd. (hereinafter “Dayco”), who respectfully request 

that this Honorable Court grant Dayco leave to file a Sur-Reply Memorandum in response 

to Plaintiff’s Reply Brief on the issue of remand. Defendants believe that this two-page 

memorandum will clarify the issues before the Court in the remand motion. Defendants’ 

Sur-Reply Memorandum is being filed contemporaneously with this motion.

Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 47 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 1 of 3
2

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ James E. Blazek

JAMES E. BLAZEK (LA 3154)

RICHARD B. EASON (LA 5248)

DONNA M. BORRELLO (LA 16817)

Adams and Reese LLP

4500 One Shell Square

New Orleans, LA 70139

Telephone: (504) 581-3234

Facsimile: (504) 566-0210

jim.blazek@arlaw.com

Attorneys for Defendants, Dayco 

Products, LLC, and Mark IV Industries, 

Ltd.

OF COUNSEL:

BRIAN MOSHOLDER (MOS-018)

Carpenter, Ingram & Mosholder, LLPO

4121 Carmichael Road, Suite 303

Montgomery, AL 36106

Telephone: (334) 213-5600

bmosholder@carpenterfirm.com

MYRON PENN

Penn & Seaborn, LLC

P. O. Box 688

Clayton, AL 36106

Telephone: (3334) 738-4486

myronpenn28@hotmail.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of Court by 

using the CM/ECF system, which will send a notice of electronic filing to the parties and 

counsel who are filing users, and that service was accomplished on any counsel who is not a 

filing user by United States Mail on September 22, 2006.

__/s/ James E. Blazek______________

James E. Blazek

Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 47 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 2 of 3
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

*************

MAY’S DISTRIBUTING CO. INC., *

* Civ. Action No. 2:06-CV-702

Plaintiff, *

* Judge Fuller

vs. *

*

TOTAL CONTAINMENT, INC., ET AL *

*

Defendants * JURY TRIAL REQUESTED

*************

O R D E R

Considering the foregoing Motion for Leave filed by Defendants, Dayco Products, 

LLC and Mark IV Industries, Ltd.:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendants, 

Dayco Products, LLC and Mark IV Industries, Ltd. are hereby granted leave to file a 

Sur-Reply Memorandum in response to Plaintiff’s Reply Brief on the issue of remand.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 47 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 76474]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30811]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel. A Tolerance Approach to 
Xenotransplantation.
    Date: January 20, 2011.
    Time: 12 p.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20817.
    Contact Person: Quirijn Vos, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, NIH/
NIAID/DHHS, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892. 
301-451-2666. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b8c9ced7cbf8d6d1d9d1dc96d6d1d096dfd7ce"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d7a6a1b8a497b9beb6beb3f9b9bebff9b0b8a1">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 2, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-30811 Filed 12-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Part 14 -UNITED STATES SPECIAL

OPERATIONS COMMAND ACTIVITY

ADDRESS NUMBERS

Parent topic: APPENDIX G - RESERVED Table Of Contents
LEGAL02/30054243v1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

ROBERT D. BROOKS and ALICE 

BRADLEY,

)

)

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

)

Civil Action No. 2:06-CV-680-LESCSC

v. )

)

)

)

PACTIV CORPORATION and 

LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORPORATION

)

)

)

Defendants. )

)

CONSENT ORDER ENLARGING TIME

TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

With the express consent and agreement of counsel for Plaintiffs, Defendant 

Pactiv Corporation and Defendant Louisiana-Pacific Corporation; and

It appearing that the period of time within which Defendants may answer, plead, 

move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint has not yet expired;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, in accordance with Rule 6(b) of the Federal Rules of 

Civil Procedure, that the time within which Defendants may answer, plead, move, or 

otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint be enlarged through and including September 

25, 2006. 

This ____ day of _____________, 2006.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:06-cv-00680-LES-CSC Document 8 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### In the Matter of James R. Becker, an Attorney, Respondent. Committee on Professional Standards, Third Judicial Department, Petitioner.

Respondent was admitted to the Bar by this court on April 15, 1969. Petitioner moves to confirm the report of the Hearing Judge which sustained three charges of professional misconduct consisting of neglect of a personal injury action, undertaking a legal matter involving a claim by his client against her fire insurance carrier without adequate preparation and thereafter neglecting the matter, and failure to co-operate with petitioner and its predecessor in its investigation of inquiries concerning his conduct. The evidence in the record supports the findings of the Hearing Judge. Therefore, petitioner’s motion to confirm the report is granted. In mitigation, we note that the award made to respondent’s client in the personal injury action was fully satisfied after the client obtained new counsel and that the claim of respondent’s client against her fire insurance carrier was subsequently settled after other counsel was substituted for respondent. However, we cannot condone respondent’s misconduct. Under all the circumstances, we conclude that respondent should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months and thereafter until the further order of the court. Respondent suspended for a period of six months, the date of commencement to be fixed in the order to be entered hereon. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Kane and Main, JJ., concur.
# L_2016349EN.01000801.xml

| 21.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 349/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 349/8

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on improving securities settlement in the European Union and on central securities depositories and amending Directives 98/26/EC and 2014/65/EU and Regulation (EU) No 236/2012

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 257 of 28 August 2014
  )

On page 56, Article 54(8), third subparagraph:

for:

‘Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.’,

read:

‘Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010.’

---
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2022-04-13T07:13:29-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Zogenix, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ann D. Rhoads, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: April 28, 2016/s/ Ann D. RhoadsAnn D. RhoadsChief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 900.114 Designation of arbitrator.

The Administrator, after receiving the submission, will designate one or more persons to act as arbitrator.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

BARBARA M. JEFFERS and )

JOAN K. CRAIG, )

)

PlaintiffS, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06cv685-WKW

)

RUSSELL COUNTY BOARD )

OF EDUCATION, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that this matter be and is hereby set for a mediation

conference on February 15, 2008, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 4B, United States Courthouse,

One Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama. It is further

ORDERED that counsel and the parties or a representative with full authority to settle

the case shall appear at and attend this conference. The plaintiff should be prepared to

present documents substantiating any claims for damages.

If counsel have not held a good faith, face-to-face settlement conference as required

in the court’s scheduling order, counsel shall hold this conference not less than seven days

prior to the date set for mediation. On or before the close of business on February 13, 2008,

each party shall provide the undersigned judge with a confidential mediation conference

statement. The statement should not be filed with the clerk's office and should not be served

on the other parties. The parties may transmit the statement to chambers by facsimile at

(334) 954-3709. The statement is solely for the court's use in preparing for the mediation

conference. The statement shall be limited to ten (10) pages and should include:

1. An estimate of the costs of future litigation in this case, including the cost of trial

and trial preparation;

Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 55 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 1 of 2
2

2. A history of the litigation and past settlement discussions including the results of

the face-to-face settlement conference;

3. A explanation of the party's claims or defenses and a candid assessment of the

strengths and weaknesses of those claims or defenses;

4. A candid statement of the following:

a. the party’s objectives in this litigation.

b. the nature of the relationship between the party and counsel.

c. sensitive issues or matters.

5. The relief sought -- where damages are sought, the party should provide the court

with evidence supporting the damage request. 

6. A full and complete explanation of any subrogation claims and how these claims

impact on the plaintiff’s claim for damages.

7. Counsel’s candid assessment of any impediments to settlement.

8. Counsel's assessment about whether opening statements from counsel will benefit

the mediation process.

In addition to the foregoing, prior to the mediation conference counsel shall confer

and attempt to agree upon the form and contents of mutual releases for execution if this case

is settled.

Done this 4 day of February, 2008. th

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 55 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 2 of 2
1348.201 Clauses for supply or service contracts.       The designee authorized to grant exemptions from the requirements of FAR Part 48 for a contract or class of contracts is set forth in CAM 1301.70.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1348.2 - Contract Clauses
###### Editorial Note on Part 782

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 782 appear at 61 FR 32643, June 25, 1996.

#### § 782.19 Penalty for noncompliance.

It shall be a violation of 18 U.S.C. 1001 for any entity to engage in fraud with respect to, or to knowingly violate, the provisions set forth in this part.
<PAGE>



Exhibit 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATION*

I, William A. Owen, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Outdoor Channel
Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this report fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

         (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting

Date: August 13, 2004              /s/ William A. Owen
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   WILLIAM A. OWEN, Chief Financial Officer
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Authority:

7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 800.33 How to register.

Any person who is required or desires to register must submit an application for registration to the Service. Application forms can be obtained from the Service. Each application shall: (a) Be typewritten or legibly written in English; (b) include all information required by the application form; and (c) be signed by the applicant. The information required by this paragraph may be submitted to the Service via telephone, subject to written confirmation. An applicant shall furnish any additional information requested by the Service for consideration of the application.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0580-0012)

[48 FR 44453 and 44456, Sept. 29, 1983, as amended at 54 FR 5924, Feb. 7, 1989]
# 207.171 Component breakout.

- 207.171-1 Scope. 
- 207.171-2 Definition. 
- 207.171-3 Policy. 
- 207.171-4 Procedures. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 207.1 - ACQUISITION PLANS
AAM-12-394-E 

May 31, 2011 

 

 Exemption No. 10548 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0559 

Mr. Chris McNeill 

Owner/Member 

Helicopter Commute Service, LLC 

60 Henshaw Avenue 

White Plains, NJ 07081 

Dear Mr. McNeill: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated May 21, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Helicopter Commute Service, LLC (Helicopter Commute Service) for an exemption 

from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, 

would allow Helicopter Commute Service, which is operating under separate parts of the 

regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Helicopter Commute Service. 

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 

operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into 

one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that 
2 

provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden 

the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs. 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No. 9703; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 

also apply to the situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Helicopter Commute Service, LLC an exemption from 

part 120 to the extent necessary to allow Helicopter Commute Service, which is operating 

under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one 

testing program, subject to the conditions and limitations described below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of Helicopter Commute Service are subject to the drug and alcohol 

regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of 

the Helicopter Commute Service part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

This exemption terminates on June 30, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

James R. Fraser, M.D. 

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon 

Enclosure
ASSIGNMENT
                             OF
                 PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT

      THIS ASSIGNMENT made and entered into this 2nd day  of
October  2001, by and between AEI FUND MANAGEMENT,  INC.,  a
Minnesota corporation, ("Assignor") and AEI Real Estate Fund
85-A  Limited  Partnership a Minnesota  Limited  Partnership
("Assignee");

     WITNESSETH, that:

      WHEREAS, on the 16th day of September, 2001,  Assignor
entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement (the "Agreement")
for that certain property located at 393 West Center Street,
West  Bridgewater, MA  02379 (the "Property")  with  NNN-CW,
LP, a Delaware limited partnership as Seller; and

      WHEREAS, Assignor desires to assign an undivided fifty
seven percent (57.0%) of its rights, title and interest  in,
to  and  under  the  Agreement to  Assignee  as  hereinafter
provided;

      NOW, THEREFORE, for One Dollar ($1.00) and other  good
and  valuable  consideration, receipt  of  which  is  hereby
acknowledged,  it is hereby agreed between  the  parties  as
follows:

     1.    Assignor  assigns all of its  rights,  title  and
     interest in, to and under the Agreement to Assignee, to
     have  and  to  hold  the same unto  the  Assignee,  its
     successors and assigns;

     2.    Assignee  hereby  assumes all  rights,  promises,
     covenants,   conditions  and  obligations   under   the
     Agreement  to be performed by the Assignor  thereunder,
     and  agrees  to be bound for all of the obligations  of
     Assignor under the Agreement.

All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain
unchanged and continue in full force and effect.

AEI FUND MANAGEMENT, INC.  ("Assignor")

By: /s/ Robert P Johnson
        Robert P. Johnson, its President

AEI REAL ESTATE FUND 85-A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP  ("Assignee")
BY: Net Lease Management 85-A, Inc.


By: /s/ Robert P Johnson
        Robert P. Johnson, its President
The technical information in this manual is based on laws,

regulations, policies, and procedures published as of:

June 2001

The Blue Book

U.S. Department of Education

Washington, DC 20202

Accounting, Recordkeeping, and Reporting by Postsecondary

Educational Institutions for

Federally Funded

Student Financial Aid Programs