alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
729.402-70 Foreign contracts.       (a) The annual Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act (SFOAA) requires USAID to take certain steps to prevent countries from imposing taxes, including value added tax (VAT) and customs duties, on U.S. foreign assistance, or if imposed, requires the countries to reimburse the assessed taxes or duties. The SFOAA also requires certain reporting to Congress on host country taxation. Because countries imposing such taxes assess them directly on contractors, USAID requires contractors to report annually on whether taxes have been imposed and, if so, whether the foreign government reimbursed the taxes.          (b) The contracting officer must insert the clause at § 752.229–71, Reporting of Foreign Taxes, in solicitations and resulting contracts when:          (1) A contract is fully or partially funded with funds appropriated under titles III through VI of an SFOAA making appropriations for the Department of State, foreign operations, and related programs, and          (2) The contract is to be performed wholly or partly in a foreign country.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 729.4—Contract Clauses
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 236 (Thursday, December 9, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76727-76728]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30936]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER11-2201-000]


Evergreen Wind Power III, LLC; Supplemental Notice that Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

December 1, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Evergreen Wind Power III, LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is December 21, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission,

[[Page 76728]]

888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b3f5f6e1f0fcdddfdaddd6e0c6c3c3dcc1c7f3d5d6c1d09dd4dcc5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3f797a6d7c70515356515a6c4a4f4f504d4b7f595a4d5c11585049">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-30936 Filed 12-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
DOE Plug-In Vehicle and Infrastructure Community Readiness Workshop July 22nd, 2010 Welcome, Jake [ LOGOUT ]

PLUG-IN VEHICLE and INFRASTRUCTURE WORKSHOP AGENDA U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20585 Main Auditorium, July 22, 2010 8:30 - 8:45 Welcoming Remarks and Workshop Purpose David Sandalow, Assistant Secretary for Policy and International Affairs , DOE 8:45 - 9:15 Case study: Oregon's plug-in vehicle and infrastructure plan Rick Wallace , Oregon Department of Energy 9:15 - 11:00 Panel Discussion: Planning, Processes, Financing, and Partnerships Planning a city's plug-in vehicle deployment efforts The charger installation and permitting process Incentives and financing models for vehicles, chargers, and power Partnerships across city governments, utilities, nonprofits, educational institutions, and other key actors Panel moderated by Don Karner , ECOtality Panelists: Colleen Crowinshield , Pima Association of Governments (AZ); Susan Freedman , San Diego Association of Governments (CA); Paul Mitchell , Energy Systems Network (IN); Laura Spanjian , City of Houston (TX); Rick Wallace , Oregon Department of Energy 11:00 - 12:00 Facilitated discussion on community best practices 12:00 - 1:00 Lunch 1:00 - 2:15 Automakers' & dealers' perspectives on building plug-in vehicle markets Incentives, innovative city models , technical, first responder and other workforce training, outreach and consumer education Panel moderated by Patrick Davis, U.S. Department of Energy Panelists : Nancy Gioia , Ford ; Douglas Greenhaus , National Automobile Dealers Association; WEBCAST ARCHIVES

WEBCAST SPONSORS

WEBCAST POWERED BY
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         34,327
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  90,609
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              124,936
<PP&E>                                        163,176
<DEPRECIATION>                                 95,434
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                194,275
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         193,868
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                      128,623
<OTHER-SE>                                   (161,926)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  194,275
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              365,681
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 322,235
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                43,446
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   43,446
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    .012
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .012
        

</TABLE>
#### § 959.29 Acceptance.

Any person selected as a committee member or alternate shall qualify by filing a written acceptance within ten days after being notified of such selection.
|  | HOMECOMMENTHELPSEARCH  |
|--|-----------------------------|

**       International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV)* Disclaimer: You must have Adobe 	  Acrobat Reader 5.0 to properly view The Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV) Conference 	  proceedings material. Click 	  here to download!The 16th           International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles           (ESV) Proceedings -          Windsor, Ontario, Canada,           May 31- June 4, 1998  The 17th           International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles           (ESV) -           Amsterdam, The Netherlands,           June 4 - 7, 2001. 		The 18th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV)		Proceedings - Nagoya, Japan, May 19-22, 2003The 19th International             Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV)              - Washington D.C. June 6-9, 2005**

----
**EXHIBIT 33.5**

**ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA**

The Bank of New York and the Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. (collectively, the “**Company**”) provides this platform-level assessment of compliance with the servicing criteria specified in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Management has determined that the following servicing criteria are applicable in regards to the following servicing platform for the following period:

Platform:  Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed securities and other mortgage-related asset-backed securities issued on or after January 1, 2006 (and like-kind transactions issued prior to January 1, 2006) for which the Company provides trustee, securities administration, or paying agent or custodial services.

Applicable Servicing Criteria:  All servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d), to the extent required by the related transaction agreements as to any transaction, except for the following criteria:  1122(d)(1)(ii), 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(vi), 1122(d)(4)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(viii), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii), 1122(d)(4)(xiii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiv).

Period:  As of September 30, 2007 and for the period July 1, 2007 through September 30, 2007.

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the following assessment of compliance in respect of the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

•  The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

•  The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

•  As of September 30, 2007 and for the Period, the Company was in material compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report with respect to the Company’s assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period.

The Bank of New York

The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A.

|  /s/ Patrick J. Tadie |   |
|----------------------------|--------|

Patrick J. Tadie

Authorized Signer

 

The Bank of New York

|  /s/ Samir Pandiri |   |
|-------------------------|--------|

Samir Pandiri

Authorized Signer

November 28, 2007
Subpart 5124.1 - Protection of Individual Privacy **Parent topic:** Part 5124 - Protection of Privacy and Freedom of Information5124.103 Procedures.    (b)(i)  The contracting officer shall reference the following documents in solicitations and contracts that require the design, development, or operation of a system of records:       (A)  DoD Directive 5400.11.       (B)  DoD Regulation 5400.11-R.       (C)  Regulations for community-specific protected information, as applicable, e.g. DoD Regulation 6025.18-R (DoD Health Information Privacy Regulation).       (ii)  The contracting officer will ensure that work statements that require the design, development, or operation of a system of records include procedures to follow in the event of a PII breach.       (iii)  The contracting officer should ensure that Government surveillance plans for contracts that require the design, development, or operation of a system of records include monitoring of the contractor’s adherence to Privacy Act/PII regulations.  The assessing official should document contractor-caused breaches or other incidents related to PII in past performance reports.  (See 5142.1503-90(b).)  Such incidents include instances in which the contractor did not adhere to Privacy Act/PII contractual requirements.
§ 70.110 Requirements for sanitation, facilities, and operating procedures in official plants. ( a ) The requirements for sanitation, facilities, and operating procedures in official plants shall be the applicable provisions stated in 9 CFR part 381 for poultry, and for rabbits the requirements shall be the applicable provisions stated in 9 CFR part 354.
( b ) With respect to grading services, there shall be a minimum of 100-foot candles of light intensity at grading stations; and acceptable means, when necessary, of maintaining control and identity of products segregated for quality, class, condition, weight, lot, or any other factor which may be used to distinguish one type of product from another.
[41 FR 23681, June 11, 1976. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977, and further redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981, as amended at 51 FR 17281, May 9, 1986; 63 FR 40630, July 30, 1998]
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

§ 868.263 Special grades and special grade requirements. A special grade, when applicable, is supplemental to the grade assigned under § 868.262. Such special grades for brown rice for processing are established and determined as follows: ( a ) *Parboiled brown rice for processing.* Parboiled brown rice for processing shall be rice in which the starch has been gelatinized by soaking, steaming, and drying. Grades U.S. Nos. 1 to 5, inclusive, shall contain not more than 10.0 percent of ungelatinized kernels. Grades U.S. No. 1 and U.S. No. 2 shall contain not more than 0.1 percent, grades U.S. No. 3 and U.S. No. 4 not more than 0.2 percent, and grade U.S. No. 5 not more than 0.5 percent of nonparboiled rice. Note:
The maximum limits for “chalky kernels,” “Heat-damaged kernels,” and “Kernels damaged by heat” shown in § 868.261 are not applicable to the special grade “Parboiled brown rice for processing.”
( b ) *Smutty brown rice for processing.* Smutty brown rice for processing shall be rice which contains more than 3.0 percent of smutty kernels.
( c ) *Glutinous brown rice for processing.* Glutinous brown rice for processing shall be special varieties of rice (Oryza sativa L. glutinosa) which contain more than 50 percent chalky kernels. Grade U.S. No. 1 shall contain not more than 1.0 percent of nonchalky kernels, grade U.S. No. 2 not more than 2.0 percent of nonchalky kernels, grade U.S. No. 3 not more than 4.0 percent of nonchalky kernels, grade U.S. No. 4 not more than 6.0 percent of nonchalky kernels, and grade U.S. No. 5 not more than 10.0 percent of nonchalky kernels. Note:
The maximum limits for “Chalky kernels” in § 868.261 are not applicable to the special grade “Glutinous brown rice for processing.”
( d ) *Aromatic brown rice for processing.* Aromatic brown rice for processing shall be special varieties of rice (Oryza sativa L. scented) that have a distinctive and characteristic aroma; e.g., basmati and jasmine rice.
[42 FR 40869, Aug. 12, 1977; 42 FR 64356, Dec. 23, 1977, as amended at 56 FR 55979, Oct. 31, 1991; 58 FR 68016, Dec. 23, 1993. Redesignated and amended at 60 FR 16364, 16365, Mar. 30, 1995]
PART 12 –– ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL ITEMS       SUBPART 12.4 – UNIQUE REQUIREMENTS REGARDING TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS                                                         12.403 Termination.    SUBPART 12.4 – UNIQUE REQUIREMENTS REGARDING TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS     12.403 Termination.     (b) *Policy.*Contracting officers shall             coordinate contract/order termination actions with the CoCO, HCO and legal counsel and,             if the contractor is a small business concern, with the Office of Small Business             Programs (OSBP). The HCO and HCA and will be updated in weekly DITCO SITREPs.         ../media/DARS-image1.png
EXHIBIT 32.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Ronald W. Hovsepian, Chief Executive Officer of Novell, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby certify that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Companys periodic report on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2008 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * *



|                       
|-----------------------
|CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
|                       
|/s/ RONALD W. HOVSEPIAN
|Ronald W. Hovsepian    

Date: March 10, 2008
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

TERRY DEESE, * 

 * 

 Plaintiff, * 

 * 

v. * Case No. 06-643-MHT 

 * 

CHAMPION ENTERPRISES, INC., * 

 * 

 Defendant. * 

CONFLICT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

 COMES NOW Terry Deese, Plaintiff in the above-captioned matter, and in accordance 

with the order of this Court, making the following disclosure concerning parent companies, 

subsidiaries, partners, limited liability entity members and managers, trustees (but not trust 

beneficiaries), affiliates, or similar entities reportable under the provisions of the Middle District 

of Alabama’s General Order No. 3047: 

 This party is an individual and is not aware of any reportable relationships. 

 /s/ C. Lance Gould _ 

 C. LANCE GOULD (ASB-0913-G66C) 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

OF COUNSEL: 

BEASLEY, ALLEN, CROW, 

METHVIN, PORTIS & MILES, P.C. 

Attorneys at Law 

Post Office Box 4160 

Montgomery, AL 36103-4160 

(334) 269-2343 

(334) 954-7555 (fax) 

Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 34 Filed 07/18/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have electronically filed the original of the foregoing document in 

this Court and served a copy upon all Defendants of record as listed below by placing a copy of 

same in the United States Mail, first class, postage prepaid on this the day of July, 2007. 

 /s/ C. Lance Gould 

 OF COUNSEL 

Gregory S. Ritchey 

RITCHEY & SIMPSON, PLLC 

3288 Morgan Drive, Suite 100 

Birmingham, Alabama 35216 

Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 34 Filed 07/18/2007 Page 2 of 2
- 1 - Alexander Van der Bellen Managing Director and

Associate General Counsel

Delta Air Lines, Inc.

1212 New York Avenue NW Washington, DC 20005

202.842.4184

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

January 4, 2011

via email and regulations.gov

Esta Rosenberg Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Joint Application of Aeromexico, Delta, and SkyWest for an Exemption and Statements of Authorization (U.S.-Mexico Codesharing)

Docket DOT-OST-2010-0300

Dear Ms. Rosenberg:

This letter is to confirm that the Joint Applicants have polled all carriers on the service list to the above referenced application and there are no objections. In these circumstances, the Joint Applicants urge that the application be granted as soon as possible.

Respectfully submitted,

Alexander Van der Bellen

cc: Brian Hedberg, DOT

Bill Evans Gerry Murphy
info@airlineinfo.com
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

VFS LEASING CO., )

)

PLAINTIFF, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:06CV638-SRW

VS. )

)

G. F. KELLY, INC d/b/a KELLY )

TRUCKING; and GUY KELLY, ) 

)

)

DEFENDANTS. )

MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINES FOR REPLIES TO MOTIONS TO STRIKE

Come now the Defendants G. F. Kelly, Inc. D/b/a Kelly Trucking and Guy Kelly and move 

the court to extend the deadlines for both parties to reply to Motions to Strike. As grounds for this 

motion, Defendants state as follows:

 1. Plaintiff filed a Motion to Strike on April 30, 2007 and Defendants filed two Motions 

to Strike on May 2, 2007.

 2. The Court issued Orders on May 2, 2007 allowing each party to respond to the 

other’s motion by May 7, 2007.

 3. The parties are in the middle of settlement negotiation and believe that the prospects 

are good for reaching a settlement in the next few days. The parties would like to avoid the expense 

of filing responses to the pending motions. It is requested that the deadline for each party to 

respond to the Motions to Strike be extended to May 14, 2007. No further extensions will be 

requested and responses will be filed if settlement is not reached.

 

 /s/James H. Starnes

James H. Starnes, Attorney for Defendants 

OF COUNSEL:

P. O. Box 590003

Birmingham, AL 35259-0003

(205) 320-0800

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 34 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have the foregoing pleading electronically using the CM/ECF system 

which will electronically serve a copy of same on all counsel of record on this the 7th day of May, 

2007 as follows:

David B. Hall

BAKER DONALDSON 

420 North 20th Street, Suite 1600

Birmingham, AL 35203

 

 /s/James H. Starnes

 OF COUNSEL

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 34 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 2 of 2