alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3229 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3229

 To clarify the classification of certain high-density fiberboard and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

   Mr. Lott introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To clarify the classification of certain high-density fiberboard and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HIGH DENSITY FIBERBOARD.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 44 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new subheading with the article description for subheading 
4411.19.35 having the same degree of indentation as the article 
description for subheading 4411.19.30:

      

``      4411.19.35        Laminate boards,      1.9 cents/kg + 1.5%  Free (A, AU, CA,     33 cents/kg + 25%
                           bonded in whole or                         CL, E, IL, J, JO,                       ''
                           in part, or                                MA, MX, SG)                              .
                           impregnated with
                           synthetic resins of
                           a density exceeding
                           0.8g/cm............

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

VICTOR TIRADO,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 497 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 3rd day of February, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
#### § 920.66 Duration of immunities.

The benefits, privileges, and immunities conferred upon any person by virtue of this part shall cease upon its termination, except with respect to acts done under and during the existence of this part.

[49 FR 39658, Oct. 10, 1984, as amended at 88 FR 82232, Nov. 24, 2023]
Case 1:06-cv-00647-WKW-SRW Document 46 Filed 12/21/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### § 917.64 Compliance.

Each shipper shall comply with all regulations. No shipper shall ship fruit in violation of the provisions of this part or in violation of any regulation issued by the Secretary pursuant to the provisions of this part.

###### Effective Date Note

#### Effective Date Note:

At 76 FR 66605, Oct. 27, 2011, § 917.64 was suspended indefinitely, effective Oct. 28, 2011.
NO. 03-16-00563-CV 

IN THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS, 

AUSTIN, TEXAS 

BILLY WAYNE BASKETT, 

APPELLANT 

V. 

LINNET SUE BASKETT, 

APPELLEE 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND 

DESIGNATION OF LEAD COUNSEL 

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS: 

Jimmy Vaught and the Vaught Law Firm, P.C., 5929 Balcones Drive, Suite 

20 I, Austin, Texas 78731, hereby enters this Notice of Appearance for LINNET 

SUE BASKETT. 

JoAl Cannon Sheridan was trial counsel when this case was tried in County 

Court at Law Number 4, Williamson County, Texas. 

Appellee LINNET SUE BASKETT, under Rule 6.l(c) of the Texas Rules of 

Page 1 of3 

ACCEPTE

03-16-00563-C

1291708

THIRD COURT OF APPEAL

AUSTIN, TEXA

9/27/2016 10:11:03 AM

JEFFREY D. KYL

CLER

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/27/2016 10:11:03 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
Appellate Procedure, designates Jimmy Vaught and the Vaught Law Firm, P .C. as 

her lead counsel for this appeal. 

For these reasons, LINNET SUE BASKETT asks the Court to instruct the 

clerk to change the record to reflect that Jimmy Vaught and the Vaught Law Firm, 

P .C. are lead counsel for her in this case on appeal. 

Respectfully submitted, 

VAUGHT LAW FIRM, P .C. 

5929 Balcones Drive, Suite 201 

Austin, Texas 78731 

(512) 342-9980 

(512) 610-9980 Fax~ 

eigh de la Reza 

State Bar No. 24037879 

leigh@vaughtlawfirm.com 

Lisa Stewart 

State Bar No. 24029851 

lisa@vaughtlawfirm.com 

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE 

LINNET SUE BASKETT 

Page 2 of3 
AGREED: 

Ausley, Algert, Robertson & Flores, L.L.P. 

3307 Northland Drive, Suite 420 

Austin, Texas 78731 

(512) 454-8791 

(5 I 2) 454-9091 Fax 

By:~' 

JAi annonSheridan 

State Bar No. 00783784 

jsheridan@ausley-algert.com 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the oregoing has been served 

on opposing counsel, Mr. Justin Jackson, Jackson Law , 1460 E. Whitestone Blvd., 

~uitej40, Cedar Park, Texas 78613, via E-Service or s· ile to: (866) 929-2838 on the 

J:/IL!..i-- day of September, 2016. 

Page 3 of3
Subpart 5619.2 - POLICIES     **Parent topic:** Part 5619 - SMALL BUSINESS AND SMALL DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS CONCERNS5619.201 - General Policy.    *(Revised October 2010)*       (d)(10)(1) The Small Business Coordination Record (DD 2579) shall be completed by the contract specialist and reviewed by the Small Business Specialist on all acquisitions (including Federal Supply Schedule orders) over $10,000, except those under the simplified acquisition threshold that are totally set aside for small business concerns.       (2)Reserved.       (3)Attach the Market Research Report (see DCG) to the Small Business Coordination Record (DD 2579) when submitting the DD 2579 for approval of acquisitions above the simplified acquisition threshold. Market research policies are located in FAR, DFARS, and SOFARS Part 10.
52.237-6 Incremental Payment by Contractor to Government.       As prescribed in 37.304(c), insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts for dismantling, demolition, or removal of improvements (a) if the Contractor is to receive title to dismantled or demolished property and a net amount of compensation is due the Government; and (b) if the Contracting Officer determines that it would be advantageous to the Government for the Contractor to pay in increments, and for the Government to transfer title to the Contractor for increments of property, only upon receipt of those payment:          Incremental Payment by Contractor to Government (Apr 1984)                                       (a) 						            The Contractor shall perform the work called for under this contract and within _____ days of receipt of notice of award, unless otherwise provided in the Schedule, and before proceeding with the work, shall pay _____ [fill in amount]. Thereafter, the Contractor shall make payment to the Government in the amount and frequency specified in the Schedule. Checks shall be made payable to the office designated in the contract and shall be forwarded to the Contracting Officer.                                          (b) 						            Upon the Government’s receipt of each increment of payment, the Contractor shall receive title to such property as the Contracting Officer determines to be fair and reasonable for that increment of payment. Upon receipt of the Contractor’s final payment, all title that has not passed to the Contractor shall vest in the Contractor, unless specifically designated in the Schedule as being retained by the Government. The Government shall not be responsible for the condition of, or any loss or damage to, the property.                                          (c) 						            The Contractor shall promptly remove from the site all property acquired by the Contractor. The Government will not permit storage of property on the site beyond the completion date. If the Contractor does not wish to remove from the site any of the property acquired, the Contracting Officer may, upon written request, grant the Contractor permission to leave the property on the premises. As a condition of the granting of this permission, the Contractor agrees to waive any right, title, claim, or interest in and to the property.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.237 [Reserved]
§ 760.306 Application for payment. ( a ) To apply for LFP, the participant that suffered eligible grazing losses: ( 1 ) During 2008, must submit a completed application for payment and required supporting documentation to the administrative FSA county office no later than December 10, 2009 or
( 2 ) During 2009 and later years, must submit a completed application for payment and required supporting documentation to the administrative FSA county office no later than 30 calendar days after the end of the calendar year in which the grazing loss occurred.
( b ) A participant must also provide a copy of the grower contract, if a contract grower, and other supporting documents required for determining eligibility as an applicant at the time the participant submits the completed application for payment. Supporting documents must include: ( 1 ) Evidence of loss,
( 2 ) Current physical location of livestock in inventory,
( 3 ) Evidence of meeting risk management purchase requirements as specified in subpart B,
( 4 ) Evidence that grazing land or pastureland is owned or leased,
( 5 ) A report of acreage according to part 718 of this chapter for the grazing lands incurring losses for which assistance is being requested under this subpart;
( 6 ) Adequate proof, as determined by FSA that the grazing loss: ( i ) Was for the covered livestock;
( ii ) If the loss of grazing occurred as the result of a fire that the: ( A ) Loss was due to a fire and
( B ) Participant was prohibited by the Federal agency from grazing the normal permitted livestock on the managed rangeland due to a fire;
( iii ) Occurred on or after January 1, 2008, and before October 1, 2011; and
( iv ) Occurred in the calendar year for which payments are being requested;
( 7 ) Adequate proof, absent an appropriate waiver (if there is a waiver, it itself must be documented by the producer), as determined by FSA, that the participant had obtained, for the grazing land incurring the losses for which assistance is being requested, one or both of the following: ( i ) A policy or plan of insurance under the Federal Crop Insurance Act (7 U.S.C. 1501-1524); or
( ii ) Filed the required paperwork, and paid the administrative fee by the applicable State filing deadline, for the noninsured crop disaster assistance program;
( 8 ) Any other supporting documentation as determined by FSA to be necessary to make a determination of eligibility of the participant. Supporting documents include, but are not limited to: Verifiable purchase and sales records; grower contracts; veterinarian records; bank or other loan papers; rendering truck receipts; Federal Emergency Management Records; National Guard records; written contracts; production records; private insurance documents; sales records; and similar documents determined acceptable to FSA.
( c ) Data furnished by the participant will be used to determine eligibility for program benefits. Furnishing the data is voluntary; however, without all required data, program benefits will not be approved or provided.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         653,704
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  590,802
<ALLOWANCES>                                    54,766
<INVENTORY>                                     37,925
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,504,348
<PP&E>                                       5,167,446
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,905,565
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,900,198
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,048,297
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         61
<COMMON>                                       105,321
<OTHER-SE>                                   (518,447)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,900,198
<SALES>                                      3,669,092
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,669,092
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,662,618
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              83,009
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                332,324
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            331,524
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   311,181
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06


</TABLE>
# L_2016155DE.01004401.xml

| 14.6.2016 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 155/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.6.2016

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 155/44

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 910/2014 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 23. Juli 2014 über elektronische Identifizierung und Vertrauensdienste für elektronische Transaktionen im Binnenmarkt und zur Aufhebung der Richtlinie 1999/93/EG

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 257 vom 28. August 2014
  )

Seite 79, Erwägungsgrund 45:

Anstatt:

„Im Hinblick auf eine effiziente Einleitung des Verfahrens zur Aufnahme qualifizierter Vertrauensdiensteanbieter und von ihnen erbrachter qualifizierter Vertrauensdienste in die Vertrauenslisten sollte bereits im Vorfeld ein Zusammenwirken möglicher künftiger qualifizierter Vertrauensdiensteanbieter mit der zuständigen Aufsichtsstelle gefördert werden, um die gebotene Sorgfalt zu erleichtern, der zur Erbringung qualifizierter Vertrauensdienste führt.“

muss es heißen:

„Im Hinblick auf eine effiziente Einleitung des Verfahrens zur Aufnahme qualifizierter Vertrauensdiensteanbieter und von ihnen erbrachter qualifizierter Vertrauensdienste in die Vertrauenslisten sollte bereits im Vorfeld ein Zusammenwirken möglicher künftiger qualifizierter Vertrauensdiensteanbieter mit der zuständigen Aufsichtsstelle gefördert werden, um die gebotene Sorgfalt zu erleichtern, die zur Erbringung qualifizierter Vertrauensdienste führt.“

Seite 88, Artikel 7 Buchstabe f Absatz 2:

Anstatt:

„Für vertrauende Beteiligte, die keine öffentlichen Stellen sind, kann der notifizierende Mitgliedstaat Bedingungen für den Zugang zu dieser Authentifizierung festlegen. Die grenzüberschreitende Authentifizierung sollte gebührenfrei sein, wenn sie in Bezug auf einen Online-Dienst erfolgt, der von einer öffentlichen Stelle erbracht wird.“

muss es heißen:

„Für vertrauende Beteiligte, die keine öffentlichen Stellen sind, kann der notifizierende Mitgliedstaat Bedingungen für den Zugang zu dieser Authentifizierung festlegen. Die grenzüberschreitende Authentifizierung ist gebührenfrei, wenn sie in Bezug auf einen Online-Dienst erfolgt, der von einer öffentlichen Stelle erbracht wird.“

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of Logan County BancShares, Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: November 24, 2004 | /s/ Mark Mareske |                    |
|-------------------------|------------------|-------------------------|
|                    | Name:            | Mark Mareske            |
|                    | Title:           | Chief Financial Officer |
|                         |                  |                         |  |

 

----
206.305 Availability of the justification.

See PGI 206.305 for further guidance on the requirements for preparing, obtaining approval, and

posting justification and approval documents for contracts awarded using the authority of FAR

6.302-2.

Parent topic: Subpart 206.3 - OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Case 2:06-cv-00674-WKW-TFM Document 26 Filed 02/27/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00674-WKW-TFM Document 26 Filed 02/27/2008 Page 2 of 2
CERTIFICATIONI, Lawrence E. Kreider, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc. (the“Company”), pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify asfollows:1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2010 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and2. The information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Certification this 10th day of May, 2010.         /s/ LAWRENCE E. KREIDER, JR.   Lawrence E. Kreider, Jr., Chief Financial Officer
52.217-3 Evaluation Exclusive of Options.

As prescribed in 17.208(a), insert a provision substantially the same as in the following in

solicitations when the solicitation includes an option clause and does not include one of the

provisions prescribed in 17.208 (b) or (c):

Evaluation Exclusive of Options (Apr 1984)

The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by including only the price for the basic

requirement; i.e., options will not be included in the evaluation for award purposes.

(End of provision)

Parent topic: 52.217 [Reserved]
#### In the Matter of Raymond L. Skelly, Appellant, v Carma Realty, Ltd., et al., Respondents.

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and summary judgment denied. Memorandum: Our review of the record reveals that issues of fact were determined by the trial court solely upon conflicting affidavits and exhibits submitted in response to a motion for summary judgment. Notwithstanding the understandable efforts of the court to resolve the differences between these parties without a trial, it was improper for Special Term to decide disputed factual issues upon the pleadings and affidavits, treating plaintiff’s claim as a request for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3212 (subd [b]) *(Matter of Resco Equip. & Supply Corp. v City Council, City of Watertown,*34 AD2d 1088). Since summary judgment deprives the litigants of their day in court, it is considered a drastic remedy which should only be employed when there is no doubt as to the absence of triable issues *(Millerton Agway Coop, v Briarcliff Farms,*17 NY2d 57). Where there is any significant doubt as to a material triable issue of fact where the material issue of fact is arguable, summary judgment must be denied (St. *Paul Ind. Park v New York State Urban Dev. Corp.,*63 AD2d 822; *Strychalski v Mekus,*54 AD2d 1068). (Appeal from *1006order of Monroe Supreme Court — recover personal property.) Present — Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Hancock, Jr., Callahan and Moule, JJ.
EX-10.6







Exhibit 10.6




			
	 	 	 
	
	 	Superior Well Services, Inc..

1380 RT 286 East Suite #121

Indiana, PA 15701

Telephone 724-465-8904






April 17, 2009




Mr. Arty Straehla

14301 Caliber Drive

Ste 200

Oklahoma City, OK 73134




Dear Arty:




     This letter is to memorialize our agreement that you have volunteered to reduce your
annualized base salary by 10%, to $270,000. This agreement will constitute an amendment to your
Employment Agreement which was executed by you on September 15, 2008 (the “Employment Agreement”).
You explicitly acknowledge and agree that the reduction in your base salary has been completely
voluntary and will not be considered a “Change in Terms of Service,” as defined in the Employment
Agreement.



     Thank you for your continued service to Superior Well Services.



	 	 	 
	 

	 	Sincerely,
	 
	 	 
	 

	 	/s/ Dave Wallace
	ACCEPTED AND AGREED:
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	/s/ Arty Straehla
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	April 17, 2009
#### In the Matter of Barry M. McCoy, Respondent, v. Everett F. McNab et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the County of Suffolk, Appellants and Dolores Fletcher, Respondent.

In a proceeding to validate petitions designating petitioner, Barry M. McCoy, as a candidate in the Democratic Party Primary Election to be held on June 23,1970 for the Party position of Member of the County Committee for 121st Election District of the Town of Brookhaven, Suffolk County, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered June 5,1970, which granted the application. Judgment affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Rabin, Acting P. J., Munder and Benjamin, JJ., concur; Martuscello and Latham, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the judgment and dismiss the proceeding *(Matter of Crosbie*v. *Cohen,*281 N. Y. 329).
#### §§ 766.3-766.50 [Reserved]
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

NICHOLAS STRICKLAND, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) Case No. 1:06-cv-682-TFM

)

CHAMPION HOME BUILDERS CO., INC. )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

Upon of review of Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 63, filed March

28, 2008), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion be submitted without oral argument on

April 28, 2008.

It is further ORDERED that Plaintiffs file a response which shall include a brief and

evidentiary materials on or before April 21, 2008. Defendant may file a reply brief on or

before April 28, 2008. 

The parties are further advised that they are required to submit a paper courtesy copy

of briefs and supporting evidence to the Chambers of the undersigned. For those

submissions (including briefs and evidentiary materials) that exceed twenty-five (25) pages,

the courtesy copy shall be bound in a three-ring binder and tabbed. 

Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 68 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

 DONE this 31st day of March, 2008.

 /s/Terry F. Moorer 

TERRY F. MOORER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 68 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 2 of 2
§ 632.17 Cost-share rates. ( a ) Cost-share rates paid by the Federal Government are to be established and issued as instructions by the NRCS Administrator in accordance with the following criteria: ( 1 ) For 120 acres or less, the cost-share rate is to provide up to 80 percent of the costs of land use and conservation treatment depending on the income-producing potential of the land after reclamation. However, this rate may be increased to a level required to obtain participation if the main benefits of reclamation are offsite (in the public interest) and there is a declaration of financial burden by the participant.
( 2 ) The rate on acreage in excess of 120 acres up to 320 acres maximum is to be reduced by up to 0.5 percent per acre. This reduced rate applies to the entire acreage offered for contract.