alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2892 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on mucochloric acid. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 19, 2006 

Mr. BURR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on mucochloric 

acid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MUCOCHLORIC ACID. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.05 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 mucochloric acid) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•S 2892 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,661
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,665
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        120
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,668
<PP&E>                                           5,395
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,723
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,793
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,106
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            22
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,779
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,793
<SALES>                                          2,451
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,451
<CGS>                                            2,155
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,155
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   182
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    129
<INCOME-TAX>                                        44
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 85
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        85
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .057
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .057
        

</TABLE>
407.503 Policy.

(a) HCA's shall establish procedures to ensure that requesting activities provide the written

determination required by FAR 7.503(e), when submitting requests for procurement of services.

(b) In the event of a disagreement as to whether the functions to be performed are inherently

governmental, the HCA may refer the matter to the Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) for

resolution. When submitting disagreements to the SPE for resolution the HCA shall provide a

summary of the areas of disagreement, supported by the following:

(1) The HCA's assessment of whether the services are “inherently governmental”;

(2) The basis for that assessment (include references to the definition and policy in FAR subpart 7.5

and/or Office of Federal Procurement Policy letter 92-1);

(3) A copy of the statement of work; and,

(4) The requesting activity's written determination in accordance with FAR 7.503(e).

(c) Such disagreements shall be resolved prior to issuance of the solicitation.

Parent topic: Subpart 407.5 - Inherently Governmental Functions
252.236-7012 Military Construction on

Kwajalein Atoll—Evaluation Preference.

As prescribed in 236.570 (c)(2), use the following provision:

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION ON KWAJALEIN ATOLL—EVALUATION PREFERENCE (MAR 1998)

(a) Definitions. As used in this provision—

(1) “Marshallese firm” means a local firm incorporated in the Marshall Islands, or otherwise legally

organized under the laws of the Marshall Islands, that—

(i) Is more than 50 percent owned by citizens of the Marshall Islands; or

(ii) Complies with the following:

(A) The firm has done business in the Marshall Islands on a continuing basis for not less than 3 years

prior to the date of issuance of this solicitation;

(B) Substantially all of the firm’s directors of local operations, senior staff, and operating personnel

are resident in the Marshall Islands or are U.S. citizens; and

(C) Most of the operating equipment and physical plant are in the Marshall Islands.

(2) “United States firm” means a firm incorporated in the United States that complies with the

following:

(i) The corporate headquarters are in the United States;

(ii) The firm has filed corporate and employment tax returns in the United States for a minimum of 2

years (if required), has filed State and Federal income tax returns (if required) for 2 years, and has

paid any taxes due as a result of these filings; and

(iii) The firm employs United States citizens in key management positions.

(b) Evaluation. Offers from firms that do not qualify as United States firms or Marshallese firms will

be evaluated by adding 20 percent to the offer, unless application of the factor would not result in

award to a United States firm.

(c) Status. The offeror is ______ a United States firm; ______ a Marshallese firm; _______ Other.

(End of provision)

Parent topic: 252.236 RESERVED
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲ ▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

06/01

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 01 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL
# L_2017144DE.01003801.xml

| 7.6.2017 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 144/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2017

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 144/38

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 511/2014 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 16. April 2014 über Maßnahmen für die Nutzer zur Einhaltung der Vorschriften des Protokolls von Nagoya über den Zugang zu genetischen Ressourcen und die ausgewogene und gerechte Aufteilung der sich aus ihrer Nutzung ergebenden Vorteile in der Union

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 150 vom 20. Mai 2014
  )

Seite 61, Erwägungsgrund 20 Satz 2

Anstatt:

„Unbeschadet der Zuständigkeit und Verantwortung der Mitgliedstaaten hinsichtlich der Angelegenheiten im Zusammenhang mit traditionellem Wissen, das sich auf genetische Ressourcen bezieht, und im Zusammenhang mit der Durchführung von Maßnahmen zum Schutz der Interessen von indigenen und ortsansässigen Gemeinschaften und um Flexibilität und Rechtssicherheit für Bereitsteller und Nutzer zu gewährleisten, sollte sich diese Verordnung daher auf traditionelles Wissen, das sich auf genetische Ressourcen bezieht, wie es in Vereinbarungen über die Aufteilung der Vorteile beschrieben ist.“

muss es heißen:

„Unbeschadet der Zuständigkeit und Verantwortung der Mitgliedstaaten für Angelegenheiten im Zusammenhang mit traditionellem Wissen, das sich auf genetische Ressourcen bezieht, und im Zusammenhang mit der Durchführung von Maßnahmen zum Schutz der Interessen von indigenen und ortsansässigen Gemeinschaften und um Flexibilität und Rechtssicherheit für Bereitsteller und Nutzer zu gewährleisten, sollte diese Verordnung daher an traditionelles Wissen anknüpfen, das sich auf genetische Ressourcen bezieht, wie es in Vereinbarungen über die Aufteilung der Vorteile beschrieben ist.“

---
#### § 500.20 Scope.

This subpart sets forth schedules of fees for temporary use by individuals or groups of United States National Arboretum (USNA) facilities and grounds. This subpart also sets forth schedules of fees for the use of the USNA for commercial photography and cinematography. Fees generated will be used to offset costs of services or for the purposes of promoting the mission of the USNA. All rules and regulations noted in 7 CFR 500, subpart A—Conduct on the U.S. National Arboretum Property, will apply to individuals or groups granted approval to use the facilities and grounds for the purposes specified in this subpart.
12.403 Termination.     (b) *Policy.*Contracting officers shall             coordinate contract/order termination actions with the CoCO, HCO and legal counsel and,             if the contractor is a small business concern, with the Office of Small Business             Programs (OSBP). The HCO and HCA and will be updated in weekly DITCO SITREPs.         ../media/DARS-image1.png **Parent topic:** SUBPART 12.4 – UNIQUE REQUIREMENTS REGARDING TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 238 (Monday, December 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77658-77659]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31211]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLNVB00000.L14300000.ET0000; NVN-50507; 10-08807; MO; TAS:14X1109]


Public Land Order No. 7754; Extension of Public Land Order No. 
6818, Nevada

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Public Land Order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This order extends the withdrawal created by Public Land Order 
No. 6818 for an additional 20-year period. This extension is necessary 
to continue protection of the Federal investment of the Bureau of Land 
Management's Tonopah Administrative

[[Page 77659]]

Site in Nye County, Nevada, which would otherwise expire on November 
28, 2010.
    DATES: Effective Date: November 29, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pamela C. Ridley, Bureau of Land 
Management, Nevada State Office, P.O. Box 12000, 1340 Financial Blvd., 
Reno, Nevada 89502, or 775-861-6530.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose for which the withdrawal was 
first made requires this extension to continue protection of the 
Tonopah Administrative Site. The withdrawal extended by this order will 
expire on November 28, 2030, unless as a result of a review conducted 
prior to the expiration date pursuant to Section 204(f) of the Federal 
Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, 43 U.S.C. 1714(f) the Secretary 
determines that the withdrawal shall be further extended.

Order

    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of the Interior 
by Section 204 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, 
43 U.S.C. 1714, it is ordered as follows:
    Public Land Order No. 6818 (55 FR 49522 (1990)), which withdrew 5 
acres of public land from settlement, sale, location, or entry under 
the general land laws, including the United States mining laws (30 
U.S.C. ch. 2), but not from leasing under the mineral leasing laws to 
protect the Federal investment in the Tonopah Administrative Site, is 
hereby extended for an additional 20-year period until November 28, 
2030.

    Authority: 43 CFR 2310.4.

    Dated: November 23, 2010.
Wilma A. Lewis,
Assistant Secretary--Land and Minerals Management.
[FR Doc. 2010-31211 Filed 12-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-HC-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

________________________ DIVISION

_________________________________, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. __________________

)

_________________________________, )

)

Defendants, )

CONFLICT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

COMES NOW ___________________, a in the above-captioned

matter, and in accordance with the order of this Court, making the following disclosure

concerning parent companies, subsidiaries, partners, limited liability entity members and

managers, trustees (but not trust beneficiaries), affiliates, or similar entities reportable under

the provisions of the Middle District of Alabama’s General Order No. 3047:

This party is an individual, or

This party is a governmental entity, or

There are no entities to be reported, or

The following entities and their relationship to the party are hereby reported:

Reportable Entity Relationship to Party

________________________________ _________________________________

________________________________ _________________________________

________________________________ _________________________________

________________________________ _________________________________

 

Date (Signature)

 

(Counsel’s Name)

 

Counsel for (print names of all parties)

 

Address, City, State Zip Code

 

Telephone Number

Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 63 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

________________________ DIVISION

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I,____________________________________, do hereby Certify that a true and correct copy

of the foregoing has been furnished by ___________________________(manner of service,

i.e., U.S. Mail, electronic mail, etc.) on this _______day of ____________ 20__, to:

 

 

 

Date Signature

Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 63 Filed 12/06/2007 Page 2 of 2
§ 915.50 Recommendations for regulation. ( a ) Whenever the committee deems it advisable to regulate the handling of any variety or varieties of avocados grown in District 1 or District 2 in the manner provided in § 915.51, it shall so recommend to the Secretary.
( b ) In arriving at its recommendations pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section, the committee shall give consideration to such of the following factors as may be applicable: ( 1 ) The estimated total production and shipments of each variety of avocados, including avocados grown in other areas;
( 2 ) The time of bloom and growing conditions during the development of the crop;
( 3 ) The quality of the avocado crop;
( 4 ) The anticipated demand for avocados; and
( 5 ) Other available information having a bearing on the market for avocados with each recommendation for regulation the committee shall submit to the Secretary the data and information on which such recommendation is predicated, and such other available information as the Secretary may request.
( c ) All meetings of the committee held for the purpose of formulating recommendations for regulations shall be open to growers and handlers. The committee shall give notice of such meetings to growers and handlers by mailing such notice to each grower and handler who has filed his address with the committee and requested such notice.
(114 App. Div. 776)

#### FECHTER v. POSTEL.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

July 24, 1906.)

Bankruptcy—Discharge—Liabilities Discharged—Judgment in Conversion.

A judgment in an action of conversion, founded on contract express or implied, is provable against a bankrupt’s estate, and is released by his discharge.

Appeal from Special Term, Kings County.

Action by Benny Fechter against Jacob Postel. From an order canceling and discharging of record a judgment in favor of plaintiff against the defendant, and dismissing proceedings supplementary to execution issued thereon, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

Argued before HIRSCHBERG, P. J., and WOODWARD, JENKS, HOOKER, and GAYNOR, JJ.

M. H. Newman, for appellant.

Isidore Hershfield, for respondent.

HIRSCHBERG, P. J.

The order appealed from was properly granted. The judgment which the order cancels was rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of New York in an action for conversion. Thereafter the judgment debtor, the defendant herein, duly filed a voluntary petition in bankruptcy, was adjudged a bankrupt, and was discharged from all his debts provable in that proceeding. The judgment in question was duly scheduled in his petition, and he was dis*208charged from all liability on the judgment, provided the debt upon which it was founded is a debt provable in bankruptcy, and not excepted from the provisions which release the bankrupt from liability on his discharge.

The case of Watertown Carriage Co. v. Hall, 176 N. Y. 313, 68 N. E. 629, is an authority to the effect that such a debt is not released by a discharge in bankruptcy under the terms of the national bankruptcy law. The decision in that case, however, was based upon the cases of Frey v. Torrey, 70 App. Div. 166, 75 N. Y. Supp. 40, affirmed on opinion below 175 N. Y. 501, 67 N. E. 1082, and Crawford v. Burke, 201 Ill. 581, 66 N. E. 833. Since that decision, however, the Illinois case has been reversed by the Supreme Court of the United States (see Crawford v. Burke, 195 U. S. 176, 25 Sup. Ct. 9, 49 L. Ed. 147), and the rule has been therein established that a debt founded upon contract express or implied is provable against the bankrupt’s estate, notwithstanding the fact that the creditor may have elected to bring his action in trover as for a fraudulent conversion instead of in assumpsit. In Tindle v. Birkett, 183 N. Y. 267, 271, 76 N. E. 25, it was recognized that the case of Frey v. Torre)', supra, must be considered as overruled by the federal decision in Crawford v. Burke, supra. It follows that a claim for conversion is provable and dischargeable.

The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.
#### § 966.7 Handle.

*Handle* or *ship* means to sell, transport, deliver, or in any other way to place fresh tomatoes, produced in the production area, in the current of commerce within the regulated area or between any point in the regulated area and any point outside thereof. Such term shall not include the transportation, sale or delivery of field-run tomatoes within the production area by the producer thereof to a registered handler for the purpose of having such tomatoes prepared for market. A registered handler is a handler who has adequate facilities in the production area for grading and packing tomatoes and who is registered with the committee pursuant to rules established with the approval of the Secretary.

[34 FR 19186, Dec. 4, 1969]
§ 966.42 Assessments. ( a ) The funds to cover the committee's expenses shall be acquired by the levying of assessments upon handlers as provided in this subpart. Each handler who first handles tomatoes shall pay assessments to the committee upon demand, which assessments shall be in payment of such handler's pro rata share of the committee's expenses.
( b ) Assessments shall be levied upon handlers at rates established by the Secretary. Such rates may be established upon the basis of the committee's recommendations and other available information. Such rates may be applied to specified containers used in the production area.
( c ) At any time during, or subsequent to, a given fiscal period the committee may recommend the approval of an amended budget and an increase in the rate of assessment. Upon the basis of such recommendations, or other available information, the Secretary may approve an amended budget and increase the rate of assessment. Such increase shall be applicable to all tomatoes which were regulated under this part and which were shipped by the first handler thereof during such fiscal period.
( d ) The payment of assessments for the maintenance and functioning of the committee may be required under this part throughout the period it is in effect irrespective whether particular provisions thereof are suspended or become inoperative.
( e ) In order to provide funds for the administration of the provisions of this part, the committee may accept the payment of assessments in advance, or may borrow money on a short-term basis not to exceed one full-year coinciding with the existing committee's term of office. The authority of the committee to borrow money may be used only to meet financial obligations as they occur and to allow the committee a season to adjust its reserve funds to meet any additional obligations.
[20 FR 7357, Oct. 4, 1955. Redesignated at 26 FR 12751, Dec. 30, 1961, as amended at 51 FR 30474, Aug. 27, 1986]
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Authority:

7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 868.42 How to request original inspection service.

(a) *General.* Requests may be made verbally or in writing. Verbal requests shall be confirmed in writing when requested by official personnel. All written requests shall include the information specified in § 868.21. Copies of request forms may be requested from the cooperator or the Service. If all required documentation is not available when the request is made, it shall be provided as soon as it is available. At their discretion, official personnel may withhold inspection service pending receipt of the required documentation.

(b) *Request requirements.* Requests for original inspection service, other than submitted sample inspections, must be made with the cooperator or the Service responsible for the area in which the service will be provided. Requests for submitted sample inspections may be made with any cooperator or any field office that provides original inspection service. Requests for inspection of commodities during loading, unloading, handling, or processing shall be received far enough in advance so official personnel can be present.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0580-0012)

[53 FR 3722, Feb. 9, 1988. Redesignated and amended at 60 FR 16364, Mar. 30, 1995]