alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2841 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2841

  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain turn or turned footwear.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 18, 2006

 Mr. Brownback introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain turn or turned footwear.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN TURN OR TURNED FOOTWEAR.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.13.84      Turn or turned      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         footwear with                                                      31/2009
                         outer soles of
                         leather and
                         uppers of
                         leather, other
                         than for men or
                         women (provided
                         for in subheading
                         6403.59.15)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
###### Editorial Note on [Subchapter A of Chapter VIII](/current/title-7/chapter-VIII/subchapter-A)

#### Authority:

[7 U.S.C. 71-87K](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/7/71), [1621-1627](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/7/1621).

###### Editorial Note on [Subchapter A of Chapter VIII](/current/title-7/chapter-VIII/subchapter-A)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at [84 FR 45645](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/84-FR-45645), Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 810.205 Grades and grade requirements for Two-rowed Malting barley.

| Grade | Minimum limits of— | | | Maximum limits of— | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Test weight per bushel (pounds) | Suitable malting types (percent) | Sound barley1 (percent) | Damaged kernels1 (percent) | Wild oats (percent) | Foreign material (percent) | Other grains (percent) | Skinned and broken kernels (percent) | Thin barley (percent) |
| U.S. No. 1 | 50.0 | 97.0 | 98.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| U.S. No. 2 | 48.0 | 97.0 | 98.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 6.0 | 7.0 |
| U.S. No. 3 | 48.0 | 95.0 | 96.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 8.0 | 10.0 |
| U.S. No. 4 | 48.0 | 95.0 | 93.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 5.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 Injured-by-frost kernels and injured-by-mold kernels are not considered damaged kernels or considered against sound barley. | | | | | | | | | |

Note:

Malting barley must not be infested in accordance with [§ 810.107(b)](/on/2024-09-16/title-7/section-810.107#p-810.107(b)) and must not contain any special grades as defined in [§ 810.206](/on/2024-09-16/title-7/section-810.206). Six-rowed Malting barley and Six-rowed Blue Malting barley varieties not meeting the requirements of this section must be graded in accordance with standards established for the class Barley.

[[82 FR 20544](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/82-FR-20544), May 3, 2017]
#### § 956.14 [Reserved]
#### § 51.1317 Well formed.

*Well formed* means having the shape characteristic of the variety. Slight irregularities of shape from type which do not appreciably detract from the general appearance of the fruit shall be considered well formed.
Jose



# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 19, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00888

- CV

SPECIALTY SELECT CARE CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO LLC

d/b/a Casa Rio Healthcare and Re habilitation,

Appellant

v.

Jose FLORES , as next friend of Julie Flores,

Appellee

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- CI

- 04577 Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Appellant has filed a motion to abate th is appeal because one of the issues presented in

the appeal is the same issue pending in petitions for review filed in Williamsburg Care Co. L.P.

v. Acosta , 406 S.W.3d 711 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2013, pet. filed), Fredericksburg Care Co.

L.P. v. Lira , 407 S.W.3d 810 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2013, pet. filed), and Fredericksburg

Care Co. L.P. v. Perez , 406 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2013, pet. filed). This court has considered the motion, the appellee ’ s response, and the appellant’s reply to the appellee ’ s

response. In light of the pending higher court review of the precedent previously established by
this court, the court has determined that abating th is appeal pending the Texas Supreme Court’s resolution of the issue will likely achieve the greatest judicial efficiency. Accordingly, appellant’s motion to abate is GRANTED. For administrative purposes, th is appeal will be treated as a closed case, unless and until appellant files a motion requesting its reinstatement following the Texas Supreme Court’s resolution of the issue

.

Appellant’s motion for e xtension of time to file reply brief is DENIED AS MOOT.

It is so ORDERED on March 19, 2014.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
§ 956.87 Proceedings after termination. ( a ) Upon the termination of the provisions of this subpart, the then functioning members of the committee shall continue as joint trustees, for the purpose of liquidating the affairs of the committee, of all funds and property then in the possession, or under control, of the committee, including claims for any funds unpaid or property not delivered at the time of such termination. Action by said trusteeship shall require the concurrence of a majority of the said trustees.
( b ) The said trustees shall continue in such capacity until discharged by the Secretary; shall, from time to time, account for all receipts and disbursements and deliver all property on hand, together with all books and records of said committee and of the trustees, to such person as the Secretary may direct; and shall upon the request of the Secretary, execute such assignments or other instruments necessary or appropriate to vest in such person full title and right to all of the funds, property, and claims vested in said committee or the trustees pursuant to this subpart.
( c ) Any person to whom funds, property, or claims have been transferred or delivered by the committee or its members pursuant to this section shall be subject to the same obligations imposed upon the members of the committee and upon the said trustees.
**1** 

## Amtrak Regional **Amfleet Coach + PRIIA / RVAAC** 

– Impact per car: 4 seats –Existing fleet 373 cars – Fleet impact: 1492 seats –Replacement fleet: 395 cars**2** 

## Acela Business **Class Coach + PRIIA / RVAAC**

– Impact per BC: 6 seats – Impact per FC: 4 – Impact per train: 28 –Existing fleet 100 cars; 20 train sets – Fleet impact: 560 seats –Replacement fleet: 11 0 cars; 22 train sets**3** 

## 5 Section Light Rail Car + RVAAC
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3269 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3269

  To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on 3-amino-2'-(sulfato-
                    ethyl sulfonyl) ethyl benzamide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 26, 2006

Mr. Frist (for Mrs. Dole) introduced the following bill; which was read 
             twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on 3-amino-2'-(sulfato-
                    ethyl sulfonyl) ethyl benzamide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 3-AMINO-2'-(SULFATO-ETHYL SULFONYL) ETHYL BENZAMIDE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.30.90 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 3-amino-2'-(sulfato-ethyl 
sulfonyl) ethyl benzamide) is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 1 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 1 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 1 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 1 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 4 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 1-2 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 1-3 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 1-3 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 2 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 1-3 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 3 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 1-3 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 4 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 1-3 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 5 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 1-3 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 6 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 1-3 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 7 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 1-3 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 8 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 1-3 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 9 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 1-4 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 1-4 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 1-4 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 1-4 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 4 of 4
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Centenary International Corporation
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Carlos
      Fabian De Sousa ,
      Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
      the
      best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)  the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Carlos Fabian De SousaCarlos
                Fabian De Sousa
              Chief
                Executive Officer
              April
                30, 2008





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing
      certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q solely pursuant to
      section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and are not being
      filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure
      document.
|EXHIBIT
  35.1
|--------------



|OFFICERS
      CERTIFICATE
|---------------------------

I, Jeffrey Volk, a Managing Director of
Citibank, N.A. (the Company), hereby certify, with respect to the Standard
Indenture Terms, dated as of September 8, 2006, which are incorporated by
reference into the Indenture entered into by each ING USA Global Funding Trust
and the Company, as paying agent, calculation agent, indenture trustee and
registrar (the Agreement), the following:

1. A review
of the Companys activities as paying agent, calculation agent, indenture
trustee and registrar as of and for the period ending December 31, 2006 and its
performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the
best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilled all of its
obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the
reporting period.

This statement is given by the undersigned
as an authorized officer of the Company and not in the undersigneds individual
capacity.



|Date: February 28,
  2007
|-------------------------

Citibank, N.A.By:/s/ Jeffrey
    VolkName:
    
    Jeffrey VolkTitle:
    
    Managing Director


---
November 1, 2011

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

VICTOR ZAVALA, JR., Appellant

NO. 14-10-00286-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

____________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having 

considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The 

Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED, and that this decision be certified below for 

observance.
42.1503 Procedures.

(a)(1)(i) Past performance assessments are a combined responsibility of the Assessing Official (AO)

Assessing Official Representative (AOR), Reviewing Official (RO), and Contractor Representative

(CR).

(a)(1)(ii) The contracting officer shall be assigned as the AO. The RO is at least a level above the AO.

The contracting officer and Focal Point (PSD Contract Specialist) appoint AORs (Contracting

Officer’s Representative (COR) or Program Office Representatives) to assist the AO with writing the

evaluation. If the AOR is the COR, the AOR designation shall be included in the COR appointment

letter.

Parent topic: SUBPART 42.15 — CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
Exhibit 10.75


 


Supplementary Agreement


 


Party A (the Lender): Beijing Ambow Shengying
Education and Technology Co., Ltd.


 


Party B (the Borrower): Suzhou Zhixinliren
Investments Co., Limited


 


(Collectively as the “Parties”)


 


WHEREAS,


The Parties signed a loan agreement on April
5, 2017 and Party A agreed to provide a one-year interest-free loan of RMB 42,000,000 to Party B. After the signing of the loan
agreement, Party A provided RMB 42,677,000 to Party B as the actual principal.


 


NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:


		1.	The Parties agree to extend the term of such loan for additional year through April 4, 2019.



 


		2.	All other terms of the Agreement shall remain valid and in full force and effect.



 


		3.	This Supplementary Agreement shall come into force on the date of seal or signature by both parties.



 


		4.	This Supplementary Agreement is signed by two copies. Each party holds one copy.



 


	PARTY A: Beijing Ambow Shengying Education and Technology Co., Ltd.
	 
	Authorized Representative:	 
	Signature:	/s/
	Date: March 7, 2018	 
	 
	Party B: Suzhou Zhixinliren Investments Co., Limited
	Authorized Representative:	 
	Signature:	/s/
	Date: March 7, 2018
PART 726—OTHER SOCIOECONOMIC PROGRAMS       Authority:                            Sec. 621, Pub. L. 87–195, 75 Stat. 445, (22 U.S.C. 2381) as amended; E.O.12163, Sept. 29, 1979, 44 FR 56673; 3 CFR, 1979 Comp., p. 435.          Source:                            55 FR 8470, Mar. 8, 1990, unless otherwise noted.                                       Subpart 726.70 [Reserved]                                          Subpart 726.71—Trade and Investment Activities and the “Impact on U.S. Jobs” and “Workers' Rights                                                         726.7101 Trade and Investment Activities and the “Impact on U.S. Jobs” and “Workers' Rights.”    **Parent topic:** SUBCHAPTER D—SOCIOECONOMIC PROGRAMSSubpart 726.70 [Reserved]Subpart 726.71—Trade and Investment Activities and the “Impact on U.S. Jobs” and “Workers' Rights    726.7101 Trade and Investment Activities and the “Impact on U.S. Jobs” and “Workers' Rights.”       (a) *Policy.* USAID policy and required procedures in ADS Chapter 225 (Program Principles for Trade and Investment Activities and the “Impact on U.S. Jobs” and “Workers' Rights”) implement statutory prohibitions on obligation and expenditure of appropriated funds. ADS Chapter 225 requires Agency operating units to analyze a project or activity to ensure compliance with U.S. foreign policy objectives as stated in Section 601 of the Foreign Assistance Act (FAA) of 1961, as amended; the U.S. Government's trade and development objectives set forth in trade legislation; and related policy documents. If the analysis concludes that the project or activity meets the criteria for what the ADS chapter describes as “gray-area activities” or if the contract statement of work has the potential to evolve into what the chapter defines as a prohibited activity, then the planner must include in the procurement request language appropriately tailored to the specific circumstances for the contract statement of work.          (b) *Special contract requirement.* The contracting officer must insert in Section H of the uniform contract format a clause substantially the same as the clause in 752.226–70 when informed by the requesting operating unit that the statement of work or statement of objectives includes gray-area activities or investment-related activities where specific activities are not identified at the time of obligation but could be for investment-related activities, as described in ADS Chapter 225.
#### In the Matter of Jennifer R. Suffolk County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Gordana K., Appellant, et al., Respondent. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Steven R. Suffolk County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Gordana K., Appellant, et al., Respondent. (Proceeding No. 2.)

[817 NYS2d 308]

*1004In two related child neglect proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief and as further limited by a decision and order on motion of this Court dated February 14, 2005, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Lehman, J.), entered June 12, 2003, as, after a permanency hearing, changed the permanency goal to placement for adoption and directed that the petitioner would no longer be required to use reasonable efforts to reunite the family.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Suffolk County Department of Social Services (hereinafter DSS) met its burden of establishing, by a preponderance of the evidence, that a plan to change the permanency goal to adoption was in the children’s best interests *(see Matter of Amanda C.,*309 AD2d 744 [2003]; *Matter of Glenn B.,*303 AD2d 498 [2003]). Great deference is accorded to the Family Court, which saw and heard the witnesses, and its finding will not be disturbed unless it lacks a sound and substantial basis in the record *(see Eschbach v Eschbach,*56 NY2d 167 [1982]; *Matter of John Robert P. v Vito C.,*23 AD3d 659 [2005]).

The Family Court found that, notwithstanding the parents’ efforts, “their incapacity as parents is not what these children need.” The court found that the mother had only recently begun to address the domestic violence issues which led to the removal of the subject children. The parents’ progress in therapy was found to be “too little and too late to continue to consider a goal of reunification.” The court found that, despite the substantial resources provided by DSS, the parents had not developed awareness and understanding of the children’s needs. For these reasons, the court changed the permanency goal to adoption and relieved DSS of its obligation to use reasonable efforts to reunite the parents with the subject children.

Considering the testimony at the permanency hearing that the parents continued to deny that there was any domestic violence in the home, contrary to the court’s finding of June 8, 2000, and thus had failed to address the problem that had led to the children’s removal, and given that the children had been in *1005foster care for more than three years, the court’s decision to approve a permanency goal of adoption had a sound and substantial basis in the record. Adams, J.P., Santucci, Lunn and Dillon, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 10.29

                                    AGREEMENT

         This Agreement is made as of December 1, 1999 between WESTAR FINANCIAL
SERVICES INCORPORATED, a Washington corporation (the "Company") and & CAPITAL,
PARTNERS, L.P. (the "Lender").

                                    RECITALS

         A.       The Company executed and delivered to Lender a promissory note
                  in the principal amount of $500,000 dated January 26, 1998
                  (the "Note").

         B.       The Note matured on March 26, 1998 and was extended.

         C.       The Parties are entering into this Agreement to extend the
                  maturity date for payment of the Note.

                                    AGREEMENT

         NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

1.  MATURITY DATE. The maturity date of the Note is hereby extended to March
10, 2000.

2. SUBORDINATION. The Bank One Security Interest shall be and remain at all
times a lien or charge on the Residual Interest, prior and superior to the lien
or charge of Lender under the Lender Security Agreement.

3. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SUBORDINATION. Lender acknowledges that it hereby
intentionally waives, relinquishes and subordinates the priority and superiority
of the lien or charge of the Lender Security Agreement in favor of the lien or
charge of the Bank One Security Interest upon the Residual Interest, and
understands that in reliance upon and in consideration of this waiver,
relinquishment and subordination, specific loans and advances

<PAGE>

are being and will be made and specific monetary and other obligations are
being and will be entered into by third parties which would not be made or
entered into but for such reliance upon this waiver, relinquishment and
subordination. Lender agrees to execute such further documents as either Bank
One or the Company may reasonably request to reflect, implement or confirm
such subordination.

4. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the whole agreement between the
parties hereto with respect to its subject matter, and supersedes all prior
agreements whether written or oral.

5. BINDING EFFECT. This Agreement shall enure to the benefit of and be binding
upon the legal representatives, heirs, successors and assigns of the parties.

6. CONTINUING EFFECT. Except as specifically modified or amended hereby, the
Note and the Lender Security Agreement shall continue in full force and effect
in accordance with their terms.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the
date first written above.

                         WESTAR FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.

                         By:___________________________
                             R.W. Christensen, Jr.
                             Its President

                         & CAPITAL, PARTNERS, L.P.

                         By:___________________________
                            David C. Soward
                            Managing General Partner