Order: 2014-11-13

Served: November 19, 2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation

on the 19th day of November, 2014

Joint application of 

AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.,

US AIRWAYS, INC.,

AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INC.,

PSA AIRLINES, INC.,

and PIEDMONT AIRLINES, INC.

for approval of a transfer of route authority under 

49 U.S.C. § 41105 

Docket DOT-OST-2013-0082 

ORDER TRANSFERRING AUTHORITY

AND REISSUING CERTIFICATES

Summary 

By this order, we (1) grant the request of American Airlines, Inc. (“American Airlines”), 

and Envoy Air Inc. (“Envoy”), formerly known as American Eagle Airlines, Inc. 

(“American Eagle”),

1 (together, “American”), and US Airways, Inc. (“Airways”), PSA 

Airlines, Inc. (“PSA”), and Piedmont Airlines, Inc. (“Piedmont”) (together, “US 

Airways”) for approval of a transfer of route authority under section 41105 of Title 49 of 

the United States Code (“the Statute”); (2) transfer the interstate and foreign scheduled 

certificates and certain other authorities currently issued to American and US Airways

(collectively, the “Joint Applicants”), subject to the condition that the authority may only 

be used in a manner consistent with the terms of the air transport agreements between the 

United States and our aviation partners; and (3) amend the certificates and certain other 

authorities held by both American and US Airways to change the name of the holder of 

such authorities to American and/or US Airways. 

 1 On February 7, 2014, American Eagle filed an application in Docket DOT-OST-2014-0027 stating that 

the company intended to change its corporate name to Envoy Air Inc., and requesting that the Department 

revise its certificates to reflect the new name. Subsequently, by Order 2014-4-13, issued April 15, 2014, 

we revised the interstate and foreign certificates and economic authorities held by American Eagle by 

changing the name of the holder to Envoy Air Inc. In that order, we also registered the trade name 

“American Eagle” for use in Envoy’s operations.
2

Background 

On February 14, 2013, in accordance with the provisions of section 204.5 of our rules 

(14 CFR 204.5) requiring air carriers to notify us of substantial changes affecting their 

operations, AMR Corp. (“AMR”), the parent company of American, together with 

US Airways Group, Inc. (“USAG”), the parent company of US Airways, advised the 

Department of an agreement wherein AMR would acquire all of the outstanding shares of 

USAG. 

On April 17, 2013, the Joint Applicants filed an application in Docket DOT-OST-2013-

0082 requesting that the Department (1) approve the de facto transfer to American all of 

the international route authorities held by Airways, PSA, and Piedmont, that will result 

from AMR’s acquisition of the outstanding shares of USAG; (2) reissue the international 

route authorities issued to Airways, PSA, and Piedmont in the names of the current 

holders and/or to American Airlines and Envoy; and (3) reissue the international route 

authorities issued to American Airlines and Envoy in the names of the current holders 

and/or Airways, PSA, and Piedmont.

2 The Joint Applicants also request that the 

Department approve the final transfer of international authority that will occur upon the 

ultimate merger of American and US Airways.3 

Answers to the subject application were due on May 8, 2013. No answers were received.

The Joint Applicants

American Airlines and Envoy, wholly-owned subsidiaries of AMR, are Delaware 

corporations headquartered in Fort Worth, Texas. Each air carrier holds certificates of 

public convenience and necessity authorizing it to engage in interstate and foreign 

scheduled air transportation of persons, property, and mail, as well as various certificates, 

exemptions, and other economic authorities from the Department authorizing the air 

carrier to engage in foreign air transportation.4 

 2 Like Airways and PSA, Piedmont is also a wholly-owned subsidiary of USAG; therefore, the air 

carrier is identified as one of the Joint Applicants. However, Piedmont is a commuter air carrier operating 

pursuant to 14 CFR Part 298. Part 298 of our regulations exempts air taxi operators and commuter air 

carriers from the requirements of section 41101 of the Statute (i.e., obtaining certificate authority to provide 

interstate and/or foreign air transportation). Also, under such authority, Piedmont is permitted to provide 

foreign air transportation using “small” aircraft (that is, an aircraft having an original design capacity of no

more than 60 passenger seats or 18,000 pound payload). Thus, Piedmont holds no certificate authority 

from the Department that would require transfer. 

3 The Joint Applicants also filed an application (Docket DOT-OST-2013-0081) for an exemption from 

section 41105 to the extent necessary to allow the acquisition of Airways, PSA, and Piedmont by the parent 

of American to be completed prior to our action on the de facto transfer request. By Order 2013-11-8, 

issued November 14, 2013, the Department granted the exemption on the condition that American Airlines, 

Envoy (f/k/a American Eagle), Airways, PSA, and Piedmont remain separate entities until our decision on 

the de facto transfer request has been made. 4 The Department reissued American Airlines’ interstate scheduled certificate authority by Order 98-7-6, 

issued July 8, 1998. The Department reissued Envoy’s interstate scheduled certificate authority and small 

aircraft designations by Order 2014-4-13, issued April 15, 2014. See Attachment E for a complete list of 

American Airlines’ and Envoy’s foreign authorities.
3

Airways and PSA are wholly-owned subsidiaries of USAG. Airways, a Delaware 

corporation headquartered in Tempe, Arizona, holds certificates of public convenience 

and necessity authorizing it to engage in interstate and foreign scheduled air 

transportation of persons, property, and mail, as well as various certificates, exemptions, 

and other economic authorities from the Department authorizing the air carrier to engage 

in foreign air transportation.

5

 PSA, a Pennsylvania corporation with its principal office 

in Vandalia, Ohio, holds certificates of public convenience and necessity to engage in 

interstate and foreign air transportation of persons, property, and mail.

6

 

Statutory Standard

A certificate may be transferred under section 41105 of the Statute if the Department 

determines that the transfer is in the public interest. The primary criteria in determining 

the “public interest” are whether the certificate transfer would conflict with important 

international aviation policy objectives, whether the surviving entities are U.S. citizens, 

and whether they will be fit to hold the authority. Further, section 41105(b) requires the 

Department to analyze the impact of the transaction on the viability of the air carrier 

applicants, competition in the domestic airline industry, and the trade position of the 

United States in the international air transportation market.7 Also, the Department has 

previously determined that when two or more air carriers each holding international route 

authority come under common ownership and control, a de facto transfer of authority has 

taken place under section 41105 of the Statute.8 

Transfer of Authority

In support of their request for a transfer, the Joint Applicants state that AMR will acquire 

all of the outstanding shares of USAG, and USAG would then become a wholly-owned 

subsidiary of AMR. Upon consummation of the acquisition of USAG by AMR, AMR 

would change its name to American Airlines Group, Inc. (“AAG.”). 

The Joint Applicants state that following a transition period, US Airways will be fully 

integrated into American with American continuing as the surviving corporation (“New 

American”). American and US Airways intend to integrate their operations, employees, 

and route networks into a single entity using the brand name American, and the Joint 

Applicants request that the Department transfer the certificates and international route 

authority currently held by US Airways to American to facilitate their merger into a 

single entity, and allow route integration to enable US Airways and American to integrate 

their services on the transferred routes with existing services on other international routes 

 5 The Department reissued Airways’ interstate scheduled certificate authority by Order 98-7-6, issued 

July 8, 1998. See Attachment E for a complete list of Airways’ foreign authorities. 6 See Order 2004-3-32, issued March 29, 2004. Also see Attachment E for a complete list of PSA’s

foreign authorities.

7 See Order 2000-9-4 at 2. 8 See Order 2001-12-15 and Order 2009-9-4.
4

so long as they use the rights in a manner consistent with the terms of any applicable air 

transport agreement. 

The Joint Applicants claim that the proposed merger is in the public interest because it 

will generate important and substantial public benefits for U.S. passengers, shippers, 

communities, and airline workers. The Joint Applicants argue that New American will 

offer greatly expanded domestic and international options for travelers, competing 

globally with U.S. and foreign carriers and advancing competition among global 

alliances. The Joint Applicants also contend that combining the American and 

US Airways’ fleet of aircraft will enable New American to better match seat capacity 

with passenger demand and flight length, leading to greater public benefits. The Joint 

Applicants claim that such fleet optimization will offer travelers a greater number of 

frequencies, flexible scheduling, and more destinations. They maintain that the combined 

network will enhance access to 192 destinations around the world that were previously 

served by one of the Joint Applicants, but not both. 

With respect to U.S. international aviation policy, the Joint Applicants state that 

American and US Airways have no nonstop overlapping international routes; therefore, 

the proposed merger would not result in any reduction of competition on nonstop routes. 

Additionally, they argue that their existing routes bring together a complimentary 

network that will provide consumers and communities with more nonstop flights to more 

destinations. They state that New American will serve more than 30 cities in Central and 

South America. In the Trans-Atlantic market, the Joint Applicants state that the merger 

will give them a broader presence, offering service to 21 destinations in Europe and the 

Middle East to over 52 city-pair routes. Further, the Joint Applicants contend that the 

merger will facilitate growth in the Trans-Pacific market, including service to Beijing, 

Shanghai, Tokyo, and Seoul. 

The Joint Applicants attest that following the merger, the air carriers will continue to 

remain fit and continue to be U.S. citizens. Further, the Joint Applicants assert that the 

merger will have a positive impact on their viability. They expect the merger to enable 

them to achieve approximately $1 billion in net annual cost and network synergies.9

 

These synergies, according to the Joint Applicants, will create a more financially secure 

company with additional resources to weather increases in fuel prices and uncertain 

economic conditions. The Joint Applicants state that one of the largest synergies will be 

from the elimination of gaps in American’s and US Airways’ current international route 

networks. Also, the combined air carrier will be able to expand its international service 

and reinvest in new products and services. Thus, the Joint Applicants assert that these 

synergies will enable the new merged airline to compete vigorously and efficiently in the 

intensely competitive global air transportation arena.

To the extent that the route transfers have any impact on domestic competition, the Joint 

Applicants maintain that the merger will enhance domestic competition. According to 

the Joint Applicants, New American will have 24.5 percent of domestic available seat 

miles and will compete against the nationwide networks of other U.S. air carriers. The 

 9 The Joint Applicants state that they expect total synergies of more than $1.4 billion, but they have 

agreed to share $400 million with employees through increased compensation.
5

Joint Applicants state the New American plans to retain all American’s and US Airways’ 

hubs and offer service on 682 domestic routes to 218 destinations. The Joint Applicants 

note that across this vast array of routes, American and US Airways overlap on only 

12 nonstop domestic routes.10

With respect to the merger’s impact on the trade position of the United States in the 

international air transportation market, the Joint Applicants argue that the proposed 

merger will have a positive effect, claiming that the country’s trade position will be 

enhanced by the creation of New American. The Joint Applicants state that New 

American will have a route network serving over 325 worldwide destinations, including 

key capital cities, business centers, and tourist destinations in Europe, the Middle East, 

Central and South America, Mexico, Canada, the Caribbean, and Asia. Moreover, the 

Joint Applicants contend that New American will be able to develop international routes 

and gateways on a scale that the Joint Applicants could not achieve independently, 

providing new travel options for U.S. and foreign travelers. Thus, the Joint Applicants 

contend that New American’s enhanced ability to compete will positively impact the 

trade position of the United States.

Lastly, the Joint Applicants state that they are committed to fair and equitable integration 

of the labor forces, and contend that the proposed merger will benefit American’s and 

US Airways’ employees. They state that the Allied Pilots Association, Association of 

Professional Flight Attendants, Transportation Workers Union, and US Airline Pilots 

Association have agreed to new terms that take effect upon closing of the merger. The 

Joint Applicants argue that through job security, greater career opportunities, better 

compensation, and better representation, employees will benefit from the proposed 

merger.

We have considered the arguments presented by the Joint Applicants and have decided to 

grant the transfer of authority. We find that the proposed certificate transfer is in the 

public interest. The transfer will not negatively affect the trade position of the United 

States in the international air transportation market. American and US Airways have no 

nonstop overlapping international routes, and therefore, the proposed merger would not 

result in any reduction of competition on nonstop routes. Also, New American will be 

part of the oneworld Alliance which will enable the air carrier to provide even greater 

international transportation options for travelers. Overall, we find that the proposed 

merger would not conflict with international aviation policy objectives and would in fact 

support such objectives by enhancing international air transportation competition.

In addition, we find that the proposed merger will enhance the viability of the Joint 

Applicants. The merger is expected to produce approximately $1.0 billion in annual 

synergies, which will allow the combined air carrier the ability to more readily face 

future financial challenges. 

 10 The overlapping routes are: CLT-DFW/LGA/MIA/ORD; DCA-BNA/RDU; PHL-DFW/MIA/ORD; 

and PHX-DFW/LAX/ORD.
6

Moreover, we find that the integration of American’s and US Airways’ current operations 

will not only increase the options available to the traveling public, but the Joint 

Applicants’ agreement to divest slots, gates, and ground facilities at key constrained 

airports across the United States,

11 will level the playing field for other U.S. air carriers to 

compete more effectively in the U.S. domestic aviation market. 

Our review of the Joint Applicants’ pleadings and other data available to the Department 

raises no issues that would lead us to question the fitness or citizenship of Airways, PSA, 

or Piedmont, as a result of this transaction.12 

In consideration of the foregoing, we find that a de facto transfer of certificate and other 

international route authorities held by Airways and PSA to Airways and PSA under the 

ownership of AAG is in the public interest. We also find that the transfer of certificates 

and international authorities to allow for the merger into New American is in the public 

interest. We note, however, that since Piedmont holds a commuter air carrier 

authorization under 14 CFR Part 298, that air carrier does not hold any certificates or 

international route authorities which would require a transfer. 

To facilitate the operational integration of American and US Airways, the Department 

will amend and reissue the international route authorities issued to American Airlines in 

the name of the current holder and/or Airways. Likewise, we will amend and reissue the 

international route authorities issued to Airways in the name of the current holder and/or 

American Airlines. We will also amend Envoy’s authority and PSA’s authority to permit 

each air carrier to operate each other’s routes. We note, however, that only one air 

carrier, either American or US Airways, but not both of them, may operate or be 

designated to operate over a route or route segment where the terms of an air transport 

agreement limit U.S. air carrier entry on that route or route segment to one air carrier or 

the other. 

Route Integration

The terms of the blanket route integration certificate authority held by American Airlines 

allows the air carrier to integrate the authority it holds, or that it may be granted, by 

certificate or exemption, under 49 U.S.C. §§ 44109 and 41102. Upon reissuance of the 

economic authority of American Airlines, including its blanket route integration 

certificate, as described above, American and US Airways will be able to fully integrate 

the certificate and exemption authority each currently holds. We find that such 

integration is in the public interest as it will provide the air carriers with maximum 

operating flexibility and will facilitate the ability of the air carriers to implement the 

transferred authorities. We note that all operations conducted under route integration 

authority are subject to the condition that all such integrated operations are in compliance 

with the provisions of all applicable aviation agreements, and provided further, that 

 11 See United States et. al. v. US Airways Group, Inc. and AMR Corporation; Proposed Final Judgment 

and Competitive Impact Statement (78 FR71396).

12 The Department recently concluded continuing fitness reviews of the Joint Applicants and found that 

each remained fit to conduct operations as U.S. certificated air carriers. 
7

nothing in this order should be construed as conferring upon the air carriers additional 

rights (including fifth-freedom intermediate and/or beyond rights) to serve markets where 

U.S. air carrier entry is limited unless the air carriers first notify the Department of the 

intent to serve such a market and unless and until the Department has completed any 

necessary air carrier selection procedures to determine which air carrier(s) should be 

authorized to exercise such rights. Also, should there be a request by any air carrier to 

use the limited-entry route rights by virtue of the route integration authority discussed 

here, but which are not being used, the holding of such authority by route integration will 

not be construed as providing any preference for any of the air carriers in a competitive 

air carrier selection proceeding to determine which air carrier(s) should be entitled to use 

the authority at issue. 

ACCORDINGLY:

1) We grant the request of American Airlines, Inc., Envoy Air Inc., US Airways, Inc.,

PSA Airlines, Inc., and Piedmont Airlines, Inc., for approval under 49 U.S.C. § 41105 

of the de facto transfer of the certificates and other economic authorities held by US 

Airways, Inc., and PSA Airlines, Inc., to US Airways, Inc., and PSA Airlines, Inc., 

under the ownership of American Airlines Group, Inc.

2) We transfer to American Airlines, Inc., and/or US Airways, Inc., the interstate and 

foreign air transportation certificates currently held by American Airlines, Inc., and 

amend them, in the form attached (Attachment A), by changing the name of the 

holder from “American Airlines, Inc.” to “American Airlines, Inc., and/or 

US Airways, Inc.” We transfer the exemption authority and frequency allocations 

listed in Attachment E from American Airlines, Inc., to American Airlines, Inc., 

and/or US Airways, Inc.

3) We transfer to American Airlines, Inc., Envoy Air Inc., US Airways, Inc., and/or PSA 

Airlines, Inc., the interstate and foreign air transportation certificates currently held 

by Envoy Air Inc., and amend them, in the form attached (Attachment B), by 

changing the name of the holder from “Envoy Air Inc.” to “American Airlines, Inc., 

Envoy Air Inc., US Airways, Inc., and/or PSA Airlines,” We transfer the exemption 

authority and frequency allocations listed in Attachment E from Envoy Air Inc., to 

American Airlines, Inc., Envoy Air Inc., US Airways, Inc., and/or PSA Airlines. 

4) We transfer to American Airlines, Inc., and/or US Airways, Inc., the interstate and 

foreign air transportation certificates currently held by US Airways, Inc., and amend 

them, in the form attached (Attachment C), by changing the name of the holder from 

“US Airways, Inc.” to “American Airlines, Inc., and/or US Airways, Inc.” We 

transfer the exemption authority and frequency allocations listed in Attachment E

from US Airways, Inc., to American Airlines, Inc., and/or US Airways, Inc. 

5) We transfer to American Airlines, Inc., Envoy Air Inc., US Airways, Inc., and/or PSA 

Airlines, Inc., the interstate and foreign air transportation certificates and authorities

currently held by PSA Airlines, Inc., and amend them, in the form attached 
8

(Attachment D), by changing the name of the holder from “PSA Airlines, Inc.” to 

“American Airlines, Inc., Envoy Air Inc., US Airways, Inc., and/or PSA Airlines, 

Inc.” We transfer the certificate authority, exemption authority, frequency 

allocations, and other authorities listed in Attachment E, from PSA Airlines, Inc., to

American Airlines, Inc., Envoy Air Inc., US Airways, Inc., and/or PSA Airlines, Inc.

6) The authority granted may only be used in a manner consistent with the terms of the 

air transport agreements between the United States and our aviation partners. 

7) Unless disapproved by the President of the United States under section 41307 of the 

Statute, this order shall become effective on the 61st day after its submission for 

section 41307 review or upon the date of receipt of advice from the President or his 

designee under Executive Order 12597 and implementing regulations that he or she 

does not intend to disapprove the Department’s order under that section, whichever 

occurs earlier.13

8) We will serve a copy of this order on all parties listed in Attachment F. 

By: 

SUSAN L. KURLAND

Assistant Secretary 

for Aviation and International Affairs 

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at 

http://www.regulations.gov 

 13 This order was submitted for section 41307 review on September 16, 2014. On November 17, 2014, 

we received notification that the President’s designee under Executive Order 12597 and implementing 

regulations did not intend to disapprove the Department’s order. 
Attachment A

*As amended by

Order 2014-11-13

Page 1 of 1

American Airlines, Inc., for Routes 137, 147, 389, 542, 

543, 602, 628, 794, 826, 835, 903, and blanket route integration

Amend the holder of the certificate(s) to read as follows:

American Airlines, Inc. and/or US Airways, Inc.1

Where certificates involve air transportation service in limited-entry markets, the 

following condition will be added: 

( ) The authority granted may only be used in a manner consistent with the terms of the 

air transport agreements between the United States and our aviation partners.

This certificate amendment shall become effective November 19, 2014.

 .

 1 The subject certificates are being amended to reflect the Department’s approval, under 49 U.S.C. 

§ 41105, of the de facto transfer of the economic authorities held by American Airlines to Airways. To 

facilitate a smooth transition of the integrated services and to provide for maximum operational flexibility 

during this time, the certificates will read, “American Airlines, Inc., and/or US Airways, Inc.” Additional 

condition(s) may apply to certain of these certificates, as indicated.
Attachment B

*As amended by

Order 2014-11-13

Page 1 of 1

Envoy Air Inc., for Routes 537, 905, and 906

Amend the holder of the certificate(s) to read as follows:

American Airlines, Inc., Envoy Air Inc., US Airways, Inc., 

and/or PSA Airlines, Inc.1

Where certificates involve air transportation service in limited-entry markets, the 

following condition will be added: 

( ) The authority granted may only be used in a manner consistent with the terms of the 

air transport agreements between the United States and our aviation partners.

This certificate amendment shall become effective November 19, 2014.

.

 1 The subject certificates are being amended to reflect the Department’s approval, under 49 U.S.C. 

§ 41105, of the de facto transfer of the economic authorities held by Envoy to American Airlines and PSA. 

To facilitate a smooth transition of the integrated services and to provide for maximum operational 

flexibility during this time, the certificates will read, “American Airlines, Inc., Envoy Air Inc., US Airways, 

Inc., and/or PSA Airlines, Inc.” Additional condition(s) may apply to certain of these certificates, as 

indicated.
Attachment C

*As amended by

Order 2014-11-13

Page 1 of 1

US Airways, Inc., for Routes 839, 87-F, 97-F,

1

and blanket route integration 

Amend the holder of the certificate(s) to read as follows:

American Airlines, Inc. and/or US Airways, Inc.2

Where certificates involve air transportation service in limited-entry markets, the 

following condition will be added: 

( ) The authority granted may only be used in a manner consistent with the terms of the 

air transport agreements between the United States and our aviation partners.

This certificate amendment shall become effective November 19, 2014.

 1 Although only US Airways’ non-Open Skies routes that are not superseded by Order 2007-4-20 are 

listed, US Airways requests the transfer of all of the routes contained within the Order.

2 The subject certificates are being amended to reflect the Department’s approval, under 49 U.S.C. 

§ 41105, of the de facto transfer of the economic authorities held by American Airlines to Airways. To 

facilitate a smooth transition of the integrated services and to provide for maximum operational flexibility 

during this time, the certificates will read, “American Airlines, Inc., and/or US Airways, Inc.” Additional 

condition(s) may apply to certain of these certificates, as indicated.
Attachment D

*As amended by

Order 2014-11-13

Page 1 of 1

PSA Airlines, Inc., for Route 819

Amend the holder of the certificate(s) to read as follows:

American Airlines, Inc., Envoy Air Inc., US Airways, Inc., 

and/or PSA Airlines, Inc.1

Where certificates involve air transportation service in limited-entry markets, the 

following condition will be added: 

( ) The authority granted may only be used in a manner consistent with the terms of the 

air transport agreements between the United States and our aviation partners.

This certificate amendment shall become effective November 19, 2014.

 

 1 The subject certificates are being amended to reflect the Department’s approval, under 49 U.S.C. 

§ 41105, of the de facto transfer of the economic authorities held by American Airlines to Airways. To 

facilitate a smooth transition of the integrated services and to provide for maximum operational flexibility 

during this time, the certificates will read, “American Airlines, Inc., Envoy Air Inc., US Airways, Inc., 

and/or PSA Airlines, Inc.” Additional condition(s) may apply to certain of these certificates, as indicated.
Attachment E

JOINT APPLICANTS’

INTERNATIONAL ROUTE AUTHORITIES

I. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.

A. Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity

Route # Route Description Order(s)

835 Open Skies Route Authority Order 2007-4-2

None Blanket Route Integration Order 2010-12-24

137 U.S.-Haiti, Dominican Republic, St. Maarten, St. Kitts 

and Nevis, St. Lucia, Antigua and Barbuda, 

Guadeloupe, Martinique, Barbados, Grenada, Trinidad 

and Tobago, Aruba, Curacao, Anguilla, Carriacou, 

Dominica, Montserrat, Mustique, Saba, St. 

Barthelemy, St. Eustatius, St. Vincent and the 

Grenadines, the British Virgin Islands, the Cayman 

Islands, the Turks and Caicos Islands, and Union 

Island.

U.S.-Bahama Islands

Atlanta, Baltimore, Boston, Chicago, Detroit, Miami, 

New York/Newark, Philadelphia, Washington DC, 

Raleigh/ Durham-Bermuda

U.S.-Hong Kong and Singapore

Note: Routes granted by Open Skies Order 2007-4-2 

not listed

Order 1996-5-9

147 New York, Philadelphia-Bermuda

New York, Philadelphia, St. Louis-Algeria, Libya, 

Tunisia, Egypt, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Mandalay, 

Hong Kong, and Hanoi (acquired from TWA)

(Timely renewal filed – pending)

Note: Routes granted by Open Skies Order 2007-4-2 

not listed

Order 2001-4-7 

389 Between the terminal points Boston, Dallas/Ft. Worth, 

Houston, Miami, New Orleans, New York/Newark, 

Washington DC (to be served through Dulles 

International Airport), the intermediate points Panama 

City, Panama; Barranquilla, Bogota, and Cali, 

Colombia; Quito and Guayaquil, Ecuador; Lima, Peru; 

Montevideo, Uruguay; and La Paz, Bolivia, and (a) 

beyond La Paz the intermediate point Asuncion, 

Paraguay and the terminal point Buenos Aires, 

Argentina; and (b) beyond La Paz, the intermediate 

point Santiago, Chile and the terminal point Buenos 

Aires, Argentina

Between the coterminal points Los Angeles and San 

Francisco, the intermediate points Bogota and Cali, 

Colombia, Quito and Guayaquil, Ecuador, Lima, Peru, 

Order 1990-5-5, and

Order 92-6-21
2

La Paz, Bolivia, and beyond La Paz, as described in 

(a) and (b) above

(Timely renewal filed – pending)

Note: Routes granted by Open Skies Order 2007-4-2 

not listed

542 Puerto Rico-Caracas

(Timely renewal filed – pending)

Order 1988-5-42

543 Miami/New York/Newark-Caracas/Maracaibo 

Venezuela

(Timely renewal filed – pending) 

Order 1990-5-5

602 Europe/Middle East/Asia

(Timely renewal filed – pending)

Order 1996-5-9,

628 Dallas/Ft. Worth-Acapulco

Dallas/Ft. Worth-Mexico City

Dallas/Ft. Worth-Monterrey

Chicago-Mexico City

Order 1992-5-20

794 New York-Cancun

(Timely renewal filed – pending)

Order 2001-4-7

826 Chicago-Shanghai 

(Timely renewal filed – pending)

Order 2005-3-40, 

826 Chicago-Beijing (segment 2)

(Timely renewal filed – pending)

Order 2007-12-26 

903 Chicago-Acapulco, Cancun, Cozumel, Puerto Vallarta, 

San Jose del Cabo; Dallas/Ft. Worth-Cancun; 

Cozumel, Guadalajara, Ixtapa/Zihuatanejo, Leon, 

Puerto Vallarta, San Jose del Cabo; Los Angeles-San 

Jose del Cabo; Miami-Cancun, Mexico City/Toluca

Order 2011-6-11

B. Exemption Authorities

Route Description Order/NOAT Docket

Miami-Valencia, Venezuela NOAT February 4, 2013 DOT-OST-2006-26387

U.S.-Brazil NOAT July 22, 2013 DOT-OST-2013-0137

Miami-Santa Cruz/La Paz, Bolivia NOAT July 31, 2013 DOT-OST-1997-2302

Dallas/Ft. Worth-Caracas, Venezuela NOAT July 13, 2012 DOT-OST-1997-2527

Los Angeles-Shanghai NOAT July 31, 2012 DOT-OST-2010-0245

U.S.-South Africa for codesharing

on British Airways

NOAT January 28, 1998 

(timely renewal filed)

DOT-OST-1998-3401

U.S.-Vietnam for codesharing on 

Japan Airlines

NOAT February 4, 2013 DOT-OST-2002-12496

U.S.-Hong Kong for codesharing on 

Cathay Pacific

NOAT February 4, 2013 DOT-OST-2000-6824

U.S. to 4 points in Argentina, to 5 

additional points in Argentina on a 

codeshare basis only, and to 5 additional 

NOAT February 4, 2013 DOT-OST-2007-0034
3

points in Argentina on a codeshare 

basis only in conjunction with a 

designated airline of Argentina 

U.S.-Fiji, Kirabati (Christmas Island), 

Vanuatu, Solomon Islands for 

codesharing on Air Pacific

NOAT August 1, 2013 DOT-OST-2011-0197

Between points within Ecuador for 

code-sharing on LAN Ecuador

NOAT August 20, 2013 DOT-OST-2011-0210

Seattle-Beijing and to points within 

China on a codeshare-basis only for 

codesharing on Hainan Airlines

NOAT August 1, 2013 DOT-OST-2011-0228

U.S. to Cordoba, Bariloche, Mendoza, 

and Rosario, Argentina on a 

codeshare basis only for codesharing 

on LAN via Santiago, Chile

NOAT August 1, 2013 DOT-OST-2006-24194

Blanket exemption authority for 

codesharing

NOAT February 28, 2013 DOT-OST-2009-0337

U,S.-Mexico transborder routes for 

code-sharing on Alaska Airlines (Los 

Angeles-Guadalajara, La Paz, Loreto, 

Manzanillo, Mazatlan, Mexico City, 

Puerto Vallarta, Zihuatanejo; 

Sacramento-Guadalajara; San DiegoPuerto Vallarta; San Francisco-Puerto 

Vallarta; San Jose-Guadalajara)

NOAT July 19, 2012 DOT-OST-2010-0222

Miami – Cozumel NOAT August 16, 2013 DOT-OST- 2013-0154

DFW- Shanghai NOAT October 30, 2013 DOT-OST-2013-0187

U.S.-Brazil for codesharing on TAM NOAT January 25, 2013 DOT-OST-2012-0209

C. Frequency Allocations

Number of

Frequencies Route Description Order/NOAT

9 Argentina – Acquired from Eastern in 1990 Order 1990-5-5

5 Argentina Order 1995-2-23

7 Argentina – Above 14 increased to 21

when the 1 to 1.5 narrowbody/

widebody formula was abolished

3 Argentina Order 2003-8-14

4 Dallas/Ft. Worth-Buenos Aires DOT-OST-2003-15384, 

January 2, 2004

4 Miami-Buenos Aires DOT-OST-2010-0178, 

July 12, 2010 

(seasonal)

7 Brazil - Acquired from Eastern in 1990 Order 1990-5-5

3 Brazil automatic increase effective 4/1/91 Order 1991-2-15

4 Brazil Order 1991-2-15
4

6 New York (JFK)-Sao Paulo, Brazil Order 1991-6-5

1 New York (JFK)-Sao Paulo, Brazil Order 1991-8-25

7 Miami-Sao Paulo, Brazil DOT-OST-1996-1356, 

June 1, 1998

3 Dallas/Ft. Worth-Sao Paulo, Brazil Order 1995-1-27

11 U.S.-Brazil Order 1995-10-25

2 Miami-Sao Paulo, Brazil DOT-OST-2003-15965, 

August 14, 2003

3 Miami-Sao Paulo, Brazil DOT-OST-2004-17139, 

February 24, 2004

10 U.S.-Brazil DOT-OST-2008-0229, 

August 8, 2008

1 Miami-Belo Horizonte Order 2008-11-21

3 Dallas/Ft. Worth-Rio de Janeiro, Brazil DOT-OST-2010-0179, 

August 6, 2010

7 New York (JFK)-Rio de Janeiro, Brazil DOT-OST-2010-0088, 

June 16, 2010

4 Miami-Brasilia, Brazil DOT-OST-2010-0088, 

June 16, 2010

10 Miami-Brasilia

Miami-Belo Horizonte

Miami-Manaus

DOT-OST-2011-0086, 

May 13, 2011

3 Miami-Manaus, Brazil DOT-OST-2011-0086, 

February 8, 2012

14 Miami-Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 

(7 to backfill Miami-Rio de Janeiro that AA 

transferred

to Miami-Sao Paulo and 7 for Miami-Rio de 

Janeiro #2)

DOT-OST-2012-0079

May 24, 2012

3 

7

7 

Miami-Recife

Miami-Salvador

Los Angeles-Sao Paulo

Miami-Porto Alegre-Curitiba-Miami 

DOT-OST-2012-0079

May 24, 2012

Order 2013-7-4

DOT-OST-2013-0137

July 22, 2013

7 Chicago-Shanghai, China (timely renewal filed) Order 2005-3-40

7 Chicago-Beijing, China Order 2007-12-26

7 Los Angeles-Shanghai, China DOT-OST-2010-0245

July 31, 2012

7 DFW - Shanghai, China DOT-OST-2013-0187

October 30, 2013

19.5 Ecuador Order 1992-10-43

1.5 Ecuador DOT-OST-2002-12000, 

July 12, 2002

3 Ecuador DOT-OST-2009-0220, 

October 8, 2009

4 Ecuador DOT-OST-2009-0220, 

January 30, 2013

7 Dallas/Ft. Worth-Tokyo, Japan (NRT) Order 1986-10-16
5

7 New York (JFK)-Tokyo, Japan (NRT) Order 1998-5-17

7 Chicago-Tokyo, Japan (NRT) Order 1998-5-17

4 Dallas/Ft. Worth-Tokyo, Japan (NRT) DOT-OST-2002-11266, 

March 20, 2002

7 Los Angeles-Tokyo, Japan (NRT) DOT-OST-2002-12554, 

July 17, 2002

1 Dallas/Ft. Worth-Tokyo, Japan (NRT) DOT-OST-1998-3419, 

September 13, 2002

(initially 3 but 2 lapsed 

as dormant; see AA 

application on 

September 21, 2004)

1 Dallas/Ft. Worth-Tokyo, Japan (NRT) DOT-OST-1998-3419, 

September 27, 2004

1 Dallas/Ft. Worth-Tokyo, Japan (NRT) DOT-OST-1998-3419, 

January 20, 2005

7 New York (JFK)-Tokyo, Japan (HND) Order 2010-7-2 

Cease operations Dec 

2, 2013

D. Codesharing Statements of Authorization

Airline

Partner Homeland

Order/NOAT/

Department Action Docket

Gulf Air Bahrain NOAT,

August 4, 2008

DOT-OST-2008-

0195

Qantas Australia Department Action, 

May 23, 2008

DOT-OST-2008-

0138

Iberia Spain Department Action, 

February 13, 2008

DOT-OST-2008-

0044

Finnair Finland Department Action, 

January 7, 2000 ***

DOT-OST-1999-

6544

Japan Airlines Japan Department Action, 

February 18, 2010 

***

DOT-OST-1999-

4994

Lan Chile Department Action, 

January 7, 2000 ***

DOT-OST-1999-

6546

Cathay Pacific Hong Kong NOAT

January 8, 2002

DOT-OST-2000-

6824

British Airways United Kingdom Orders 2003-5-33 

and 2010-7-8

DOT-OST-2002-

13861

Lan Peru Peru NOAT

February 16, 2007

DOT-OST-2004-

19965

Royal Jordanian Jordan NOAT DOT-OST-2006-
6

March 23, 2007 26716

Jet Airways (India) India Department Action, 

January 7, 2008

DOT-OST-2007-

0078

El Al Israel NOAT

March 28, 2008

DOT-OST-2007-

0095

Lan Argentina Argentina NOAT

June 11, 2009

DOT-OST-2007-

0034

Etihad U.A.E Department Action, 

July 24, 2009

DOT-OST-2009-

0154

Air Berlin Germany NOAT

October 1, 2010

DOT- OST-2010-

0192

Kingfisher India Department Action, 

March 8, 2011

DOT-OST-2010-

0288

WestJet Canada Department Action, 

March 10, 2011

DOT-OST-2011-

0040

Air Pacific Fiji NOAT 

November 30, 2011

DOT-OST-2011-

0197

Lan Ecuador Ecuador NOAT 

December 13, 2011

DOT-OST-2011-

0210

Hainan Airlines China NOAT February 15, 

2012

DOT-OST-2011-

0228

Air Tahiti French Polynesia NOAT July 5, 2012 DOT-OST-2012-

0092

TAM Brazil NOAT 

January 5, 2013

DOT-OST-2012-

0209

LAN Colombia Colombia NOAT 

January 25, 2013

DOT-OST-2012-

0208

Qatar Airways Qatar NOAT 

February 20, 2013

DOT-OST-2013-

0007

Malaysia Airlines Malaysia NOAT 

February 28, 2013

DOT-OST-2013-

0022

*** The initial statements of authorization issued to American for codesharing with JAL, Lan, and 

Finnair did not include American Eagle. American Eagle was added by Department Action, 

November 8, 2001 in DOT-OST-99-4994, DOT-OST-99-6546, and DOT-OST-99-6544.

E. Third-Country Codeshare Designations

Airline

Partner Country

Order/NOAT/

Department Action Docket

British Airways Flights to/from South 

Africa

NOAT 

September 29, 2003

DOT-OST-2002-

12193
7

II. ENVOY AIR, INC.

A. Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity

Route # Route Description Order(s)

537 U.S.-Haiti, Dominican Republic, Netherland Antilles, 

St. Maarten, St. Kitts and Nevis, St. Lucia, Antigua 

and Barbuda, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Barbados, 

Grenada, Trinidad and Tobago, Aruba, Curacao, 

Anguilla, Carriacou, Dominica, Montserrat, Mustique, 

Saba, St. Barthelemy, St. Eustatius, St. Vincent and 

the Grenadines, the British Virgin Islands, the Cayman 

Islands, the Turks and Caicos Islands, Union Island, 

and the Bahamas

Order 1998-5-12

905 Open Skies Route Authority Order 2011-8-9

906 Dallas/Ft. Worth-Chihuahua, Guadalajara, Monterrey, 

San Luis Potosi, and Torreon, Mexico

Order 2011-11-19

B. Small Aircraft Codeshare Designation Notifications

DOT-OST-2011-0076

DFW-Aguascalientes

DFW-Hermosillo

DFW-Leon

DFW-Mazatlan

DFW-Morelia

DFW-Puebla

DFW-Queretaro

DFW-Veracruz

DFW-Zacatecas

III. US AIRWAYS, INC.1

A. Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity

Route # Route Description Order(s)

839 Open Skies Route Authority Order 2007-4-202

 1 For those authorities marked with a “*”, US Airways also applied for Statements of Authorization on behalf of 

its regional partners, PSA and Piedmont.

2 US Airways’ previous certificate and exemption authorities for various Open Skies countries were superseded 

by this order.
8

None Blanket route integration Order 2010-12-24

Route 87-F Atlanta, GA/Miami, FL/Tampa, FL/Washington, 

DC/Baltimore, MD/New York, NY/ Newark, 

NJ/New Orleans, LA/Dallas-Ft. Worth, TX –

Belize

Charlotte, NC/Baltimore, MD/Tampa, FL –

Nassau, Bahamas

Tampa, FL/Washington, DC/Baltimore, 

MD/Charlotte, NC – Cayman Islands

Order 97-7-23

Route 97-F Baltimore, MD/New York, NY/ Newark, NJ/ 

Boston, MA/Philadelphia, PA – Bermuda

Syracuse, NY/Cleveland, OH/Cincinnati, OH/ 

Philadelphia, PA/Pittsburgh, PA/ Baltimore, MD 

– Freeport, George Town, Great Harbor Cay, 

Marsh Harbor, Nassau, Rock Sound, Treasure 

Cay and West End, Bahamas

Order 97-7-24

 3 Although US Airways has only listed the non-Open Skies routes that are not superseded by Order 2007-4-20, 

US Airways is requesting the transfer of all of the routes contained within the Order. 4 Although US Airways has only listed the non-Open Skies routes that are not superseded by Order 2007-4-20, 

US Airways is requesting the transfer of all of the routes contained within the Order.
9

B. Exemption Authorities

Route Description Order/NOAT Docket

U.S. – Antigua NOAT April 21, 2006 (timely 

renewal filed – pending)

Docket DOT-OST-2001-

9932

U.S. – Buenos Aires, Argentina; 

Buenos Aires, Argentina –

Montevideo, Uruguay

NOAT October 11, 2012 Docket DOT-OST-2003-

14650

U.S. – China (pursuant to 

codeshare arrangements with 

United and Air China)

NOAT May 3, 2010 (timely 

renewal filed – pending

Docket DOT-OST-2008-

0139

U.S. – Bahamas NOAT September 9, 2013 Docket DOT-OST-2001-

9766

U.S. – Barbados NOAT July 11, 2013 Docket DOT-OST-2001-

9769

U.S. – St. Lucia NOAT July 11, 2013 Docket DOT-OST-2001-

9767

U.S. – Belize NOAT July 29, 2013 Docket DOT-OST-2002-

12259

Charlotte, NC/Chicago, 

IL/Washington, DC – Bermuda

NOAT March 8, 2013 Docket DOT-OST-2001-

11152

Orlando, FL – Hamilton, Bermuda NOAT January 26, 2006 

(timely renewal filed –

pending)

Docket DOT-OST-2004-

16899

U.S. – Brazil (pursuant to 

codeshare arrangement with TAM)

NOAT May 16, 2012 Docket DOT-OST-2003-

14651

U.S. – Brazil Order 2013-7-4, July 3, 2013 Docket DOT-OST-2013-

0072

U.S. – British Virgin Islands

(pursuant to codeshare 

arrangement with Caribbean Sun 

Airlines)

NOAT June 18, 2003 (timely 

renewal filed – pending)5

Docket DOT-OST-2003-

15254

Philadelphia, PA – Grand Cayman, 

Cayman Islands

NOAT July 29, 2013 Docket DOT-OST-1997-

2721

U.S. – Colombia (codeshare only) 

(pursuant to codeshare 

arrangement with Avianca or any 

other authorized carrier)

NOAT November 16, 2012 Docket DOT-OST-2012-

0155

U.S. – Dominica

U.S. – Haiti

NOAT May 29, 2012 Docket DOT-OST-2004-

18346

U.S. – Dominican Republic NOAT November 6, 2012 Docket DOT-OST-2000-

7340

U.S. – Grenada NOAT June 4, 2013 Docket DOT-OST-2001-

10588

U.S. – Fiji, and beyond to New 

Zealand

NOAT April 15, 2013 Docket DOT-OST-2007-

29026

 5 This renewal application technically remains pending; however, US Airways’ no longer codeshares with 

Caribbean Sun Airlines.
10

U.S. – Hong Kong (codeshare 

service)

NOAT August 20, 2007 

(timely renewal filed –

pending)

Docket DOT-OST-2003-

14303

U.S. – Moscow and St. Petersburg, 

Russia (under a third-country 

codeshare arrangement)6

Order 2008-11-5 and NOAT 

August 13, 2012

DOT-OST-2008-0283

Boston, MA/Charlotte, NC/

Philadelphia, PA – Cancun Mexico

NOAT June 21, 2013 Docket DOT-OST-2002-

13855

Charlotte, NC – Cozumel, Mexico NOAT November 6, 2012 Docket DOT-OST-2001-

9768

Charlotte, NC – Mexico City, 

Mexico

NOAT January 17, 2013 Docket DOT-OST-2003-

14575

U.S. – Saba

U.S. – St. Eustatius

U.S. – St. Barthelemy (pursuant to 

codeshare arrangement with 

Winward Islands Airways)

NOAT December 16, 2002 

(timely renewal filed –

pending)

Docket DOT-OST-2002-

13705

U.S. – St. Kitts and Nevis NOAT February 16, 2006 

(timely renewal filed –

pending)

Docket DOT-OST-2001-

10589

U.S. – St. Vincent and the 

Grenadines (pursuant to codeshare 

arrangement with Caribbean Sun 

Airlines)

NOAT May 19, 2004 (timely 

renewal filed – pending)7

Docket DOT-OST-2003-

16061

U.S. – Turks and Caicos NOAT January 24, 2013 Docket DOT-OST-2002-

12208

Phoenix, AZ – Cancun, Mexico NOAT June 21, 2013 Docket DOT-OST-2006-

24613

Phoenix, AZ – Guadalajara, Mexico NOAT July 26, 2013 Docket DOT-OST-2007-

0025

Phoenix, AZ –Hermosillo, Mexico 

(codeshare only)

NOAT May 7, 2013 Docket DOT-OST-2005-

22645

Phoenix, AZ – Mexico City/ 

Mazatlan/Puerto Vallerta/San Jose 

del Cabo/Acapulco/

Ixtapa-Zihuatanejo/

Manzanillo, Mexico

NOAT May 7, 2013 Docket DOT-OST-2007-

29308

Los Angeles, CA/San Francisco, 

CA – Cancun, Mexico

Los Angeles, CA – San Jose del 

Cabo, Mexico

NOAT June 21, 2013 Docket DOT-OST-2009-

0172

Charlotte, NC – San Jose del 

Cabo, Mexico

NOAT September 19, 2013 Docket DOT-OST-2010-

0040

 6 US Airways is currently authorized by DOT to codeshare with Swiss International Air Lines, for codeshare 

service on these routes over Zurich, Switzerland (ZRH). 7 This renewal application technically remains pending; however, US Airways’ no longer codeshares with 

Caribbean Sun Airlines.
11

U.S. – Abijan, Cote d’Ivoire/ 

Bujumbura, Burundi/ Conakry, 

Guinea/Kinshasa, Democratic 

Republic of Congo/Freetown, 

Sierra Leone/ Luanda, Angola/ 

Lome, Togo

NOAT February 7, 2012 Docket DOT-OST-2010-

0043

U.S. – Johannesburg/Cape 

Town/Durban/East London/Port 

Elizabeth, South Africa

NOAT December 4, 2012 Docket DOT-OST-2012-

0189

Points in the U.S. – Points 

worldwide on a third-country 

codeshare basis pursuant to an 

arrangement with the TACA Group 

carriers

NOAT October 18, 2013 Docket DOT-OST-2009-

0261

C. Frequency Allocations

Number of

Frequencies Route Description Order/NOAT

7 Charlotte – Sao Paulo, Brazil Order 2013-7-4 

(effective October 1, 

2014)

7 Charlotte – Rio de Janeiro, Brazil NOAT August 2, 2010

D. Codesharing Statements of Authorization

Airline

Partner Route Description

Order/NOAT/

Department Action Docket

TAP Air Portugal* Blanket Statements of 

Authorization for 

reciprocal codesharing

Department Action 

May 17, 2006

Docket DOT-OST2006-24670

Royal Jordanian* Statements of 

Authorization for US 

Airways to display “RJ” 

Designator Code

NOAT March 1, 

2007

Docket DOT-OST2007-27347

EVA Airways* Blanket Statement of 

Authorization to display 

“BR” designator code

Department Action 

January 8, 2010

Docket DOT-OST2007-27352

Singapore Airlines* Blanket Statement of 

Authorization for 

reciprocal codesharing

Department Action 

August 20, 2007

Joint Notice of 

Blanket 

Codesharing filed 

March 18, 2009

Docket DOT-OST2007-28084

Asiana Airlines* Blanket Statements of 

Authorization for 

reciprocal codesharing

Department Action 

November 30, 2007

Joint Notice of 

Docket DOT-OST2007-0059
12

Blanket 

Codesharing filed 

March 31, 2009

Air New Zealand* Blanket Statements of 

Authorization for 

reciprocal codesharing

Department Action 

September 11, 

2007

Joint Notice of 

Blanket 

Codesharing filed 

July 13, 2009

Docket DOT-OST2007-29024

Swiss International 

Airlines*

Blanket Statements of 

Authorization for 

reciprocal codesharing

Department Action 

April 8, 2008

Joint Notice of 

Blanket 

Codesharing filed 

March 9, 2009

Notice of Russia 

codesharing filed 

May 21, 2012

Docket DOT-OST2008-0101

Air China* Statements of 

Authorization for 

reciprocal codesharing

NOAT June 5, 2008 Docket DOT-OST2008-0139

TACA/LACSA/TACAPeru*Blanket Statements of 

Authorization for 

reciprocal codesharing

NOAT November 

12, 2009

Docket DOT-OST2009-0261

TAM* Blanket Statements of 

Authorization for 

reciprocal codesharing

NOAT June 15, 

2010

Docket DOT-OST2010-0127

Turkish Airlines* Blanket Statements of 

Authorization for 

reciprocal codesharing

Department Action 

July 29, 2010

Docket DOT-OST2010-0184

Qatar Airways* Blanket Statements of 

Authorization for 

reciprocal codesharing

Department Action 

May 6, 2009

Docket DOT-OST2009-0079

Aegean Airlines* Statements of 

Authorization for 

reciprocal codesharing

Department Action 

July 12, 2011

Docket DOT-OST2011-0120

ANA and Air Japan* Blanket Statements of 

Authorization for 

reciprocal codesharing

Department Action 

September 14, 

2009

Docket DOT-OST2009-0181

Brussels Airlines* Blanket Statements of 

Authorization for 

reciprocal codesharing

NOAT March 18, 

2010

Docket DOT-OST2010-0042

Lufthansa* Statements of 

Authorization for 

reciprocal codesharing

NOAT October 10, 

2003 (amended 

October 16, 2003 

and January 11, 

Docket DOT-OST2003-15946
13

2005)

Joint Notice of 

Blanket 

Codesharing filed 

July 27, 2009

Avianca* Statements of 

Authorization for 

reciprocal codesharing

NOAT November 

16, 2012

Docket DOT-OST2012-0155

South African Airways* Statements of 

Authorization for 

reciprocal codesharing

NOAT December 4, 

2012

Docket DOT-OST2012-0189

Croatia Airlines* Blanket Statements of 

Authorization for 

reciprocal codesharing

NOAT June 6, 2012 Docket DOT-OST2012-0084

IV. PSA AIRLINES, INC.

A. Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity

Route # Route Order

819 U.S. – Canada Order 2004-5-22 

B. Exemption Authorities

Route Description Order/NOAT Docket

U.S. – Bahamas NOAT June 1, 2012 Docket DOT-OST-2004-

18017

U.S. – Turks and Caicos NOAT April 20, 2012 Docket DOT-OST-2004-

18811
SERVICE LIST FOR 

AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.

ENVOY AIR, INC.

US AIRWAYS, INC.

PSA AIRLINES, INC.

PIEDMONT AIRLINES, INC.

howard.kass@usairways.com

benjamin.slocum@usairways.com

robert.wirick@aa.com

francis.heil@aa.com

urskr@state.gov

john.allen@faa.gov

dan.weiss@united.com

steve.morrisey@united.com

karin.faden@united.com

jonathan.linde@united.com

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

jhill@dowlohnes.com

perkmann@dowlohnes.com

robert.land@jetblue.com

msinick@ssd.com

jyoung@yklaw.com

dkirsten@yklaw.com

bob.kneisley@wnco.com

leslie.abbott@wnco.com

ethan.blank@rjet.com

robert.cohn@hoganlovells.com

patrick.rizzi@hoganlovells.com

john.fredericksen@suncountry.com

rpommer@atlasair.com

anita.mosner@hklaw.com

jennifer.nowak@hklaw.com

cefelts@fedex.com

nssparks@fedex.com

kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com

matwood@cozen.com

calvin.lott@faa.dot.gov

garland.s.choate@faa.dot.gov

mark.mulkey@faa.dot.gov

richard.sykes@faa.dot.gov

chester.piolunek@faa.dot.gov

United States Senate, Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

United States House of Representatives, Committee on Transportation and 

 Infrastructure

 

ATTACHMENT F