alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Docket No. F AA
- 2015
- 2471 Sept, 26, 2015 This letter is in response to missing requirements for the above Docket No. The F AA requested more information in the following 2 requirements. 1. The reasons wh y granting the request would be in the public interes t; that is how it would benefit the public as a whole. 2. Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support m y request. This communication is an attempt to satisfy the above requirements. **1. Beneficial to the Public as a Whole** 

 Bring people to Colorado to benefit our local business

– The pictures and videos created from my aircraft can be used for all ty pes tourism, sports, and event advertising. More people coming to our state and attending local events is good for entrepreneurship and generates revenue for the city which in turn makes a better place for residents to live.  Real Estate/Rental Industry

– The photos and video from my aircraft can greatly

benefit this industry
. The housing market affects man y people in dif ferent way s. Helping peo ple buy and sell homes is a great contribution the the general public.  In expensive Entertainment

– We have the ability to “give rides” with our UAS. This means someone can put on a pair of video goggles and see the camera view from the UA V. The feeling and exhilaration is much flying in a helicopter at a fraction of the price and cost. My abilit y to provide this service benefits the general public b y giving people who might not be able to afford the experience of aviation any other way

. 2. **Additional Informa tion**  My view is this is good opportunity for the F AA to make a safe, competent UAS pilot available to the needs of the public. I have listed 3 way s it benefits the public above, but the opportunities are endless. From a safet y perspective, it is my opini on the risk is very

low. I have hundreds of hours fl yi ng remote controlled aircraft, and spent the better part of my life in the aviation environment. Along with being a certificated private pilot with approximately 450 hours PI C time. Also decreasing s afety

concerns, this UAS will never be flown out of visual range. It 's not reall y e quipped to do it. It is also m y view, the aircraft I have submitted is one of the safest on the market. It has valuable safet y features that can be tested safely , and w ork. For example safety fences, return to home capability

, and more features that can be found in the user manual.
rbcaa_Ex_1047


		
			EXHIBIT 10.47
		

		
			Second Amendment to Republic Bank Place, 3rd Floor 
		

		
			Hurstbourne Lease
		

		
			Dated 9-1-2005 as Amended
		

		
			 
		

		
			This Second Amendment to Lease dated this 31st day of January, 2018 shall amend the terms of the lease dated September 1, 2005, as first amended on August 11, 2015 (“Lease”), by and between Jaytee-Hurstbourne, LLC, a Kentucky Limited Liability Company f/k/a Jaytee Properties Limited Partnership, a Kentucky Limited Partnership (“Landlord”) and Republic Bank & Trust Company (“Tenant”). 
		

		
			 
		

		
			Landlord and Tenant agree that the terms of the Lease shall be amended to extend the Lease Term and to modify the Rent payable by Tenant during the extended Term. 
		

		
			 
		

		
			WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire and agree to amend the Lease to extend the term of the Lease to June 30, 2028, and
		

		
			 
		

		
			WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire and agree to amend the Lease to modify the Rent payable by Tenant during the extended Term, and
		

		
			 
		

		
			WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire and agree to amend the Lease as heretofore set forth,
		

		
			 
		

		
			NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed that the ARTICLE II. TERM/OPTION TO RENEW shall be amended to provide for a termination date of June 30, 2028, and
		

		
			 
		

		
			IT IS FURTHER agreed that the ARTICLE III. RENT shall be amended to provide that, effective July 1, 2018, Tenant shall pay Landlord Rent for the Premises in the amount of $23.00 per rentable square foot for a total sum of Twenty Thousand Six Hundred Ninety-six Dollars and Seventeen Cents ($20,696.17) per month.  
		

		
			 
		

		
			All other terms, conditions, and provisions of the Lease dated September 1, 2005, as amended, shall remain unchanged and incorporated by reference under this Second Amendment to Lease. If there shall be any conflict between the original Lease as amended and this Second Amendment to Lease, this Second Amendment to Lease shall control.
		

		
			 
		

		
			IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Landlord and Tenant, intending to be legally bound hereby, have caused this First Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized officers as of the day and year first set forth above.  
		

			
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						REPUBLIC BANK & TRUST COMPANY

					
					
						 

					
					
						JAYTEE-HURSTBOURNE, LLC

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						By: Jaytee Properties Limited Partnership, Sole Member)

				
	
					
						By: /s/ Kevin Sipes          

					
					
						 

					
					
						By: /s/ Steven E. Trager          

				
	
					
						Kevin Sipes

					
					
						 

					
					
						Steven E. Trager
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7171

JOHN WOODLAND,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden Maryland House of

Correction; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF

MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA99-352-PJM)

Submitted: November 29, 2001 Decided: December 6, 2001

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Woodland, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney

General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

John Woodland appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See Woodland v. Corcoran, No. CA-99-352-PJM

(D. Md. filed July 10, 2001; entered July 11, 2001). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 948.151 Colorado Potato Committee membership.

The Colorado Potato Committee shall be comprised of six members and alternates selected by the Secretary. Three members and three alternates shall be selected from nominations of Area 2 committee members or alternates, and three members and three alternates shall be selected from nominations of Area 3 committee members or alternates.

[57 FR 61774, Dec. 29, 1992]
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2973 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain standard laminate wood molding 

measuring less than 8-feet in length but greater than 4-feet in length. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 23, 2006 

Mr. ISAKSON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain standard laminate wood molding measuring less than 8-feet in length 

but greater than 4-feet in length. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN STANDARD LAMINATE WOOD MOLD4 ING MEASURING LESS THAN 8-FEET IN 

5 LENGTH BUT GREATER THAN 4-FEET IN 

6 LENGTH. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

8 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•S 2973 IS 

1 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

2 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.44.11 Certain standard laminate wood molding 

measuring less than 8-feet in length but 

greater than 4-feet in length (provided 

for in subheading 4411.29.90) ................ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

5 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

6 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3208 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Methoxycarbonyl-terminated 

perfluorinated polyoxymethylene-polyoxyethylene. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. LAUTENBERG introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Methoxycarbonylterminated perfluorinated polyoxymethylene-polyoxyethylene. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. METHOXYCARBONYL-TERMINATED 

4 PERFLUORINATED POLYOXYMETHYLENE5 POLYOXYETHYLENE. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 3208 IS 

‘‘ 9902.39.20 Methoxycarbonyl-terminated 

perfluorinated polyoxymethylenepolyoxyethylene (CAS No. 107852–49–3) 

(provided for in subheading 3907.20.00) Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
EX-34 (e)
(logo) KPMG

KPMG LLP
1601 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103-2499

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Members
Regulus Group LLC:

We have examined management's assessment for those customers that management has
informed us have requested confirmation of compliance, included in the
accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing
Criteria, that Regulus Group LLC complied with the servicing criteria set forth
in Item 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) of the Securities and Exchange
Commission's Regulation AB for remittance processing services to those issuers
of asset backed securities and servicers of loan and/or receivables portfolios
that include pool assets for asset backed securities transactions (the Platform)
as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006. Regulus Group LLC has determined
that the remainder of the servicing criteria are not applicable to the
activities it performs with respect to the Platform as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2006. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with
those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
management's assessment about the Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of
less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that
comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities
related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those
selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with
the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected
transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period
covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether
errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may
have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company
during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any
other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the
Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assessment that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006
is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Philadelphia, PA
February 22, 2007

KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, is the U.S. member firm of KPMG
International, a Swiss cooperative.
5501.403 Individual Deviations.    (1) See approval requirements in 5501.304 Agency control and compliance procedures.          5501.304 Agency control and compliance procedures. **Parent topic:** Subpart 5501.4 - DEVIATIONS FROM THE FAR
# 204.7105 Contract exhibits and attachments.

The contracting officer shall use separate Contract Line Item Numbers (CLIN) for hardware requirements of less than 10 line items. The contracting officer may use an exhibit (the CLIN must reference the exhibit) when hardware requirements exceed 10 line items (generally, listed on an electronic products list). During the fourth quarter of the fiscal year, the HCO may determine to reduce the 10-CLIN threshold to a number that is reasonably needed for efficiency. The contracting officer must also adhere to DFARS PGI 204-7105 policy on the use of exhibits.

**Parent topic:**SUBPART 204.71 — UNIFORM CONTRACT LINE ITEM NUMBERING SYSTEM
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 5 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 1 of 10
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 5 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 2 of 10
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 5 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 3 of 10
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 5 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 4 of 10
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 5 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 5 of 10
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 5 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 6 of 10
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 5 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 7 of 10
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 5 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 8 of 10
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 5 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 9 of 10
Case 3:06-cv-00687-WHA-DRB Document 5 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 10 of 10
CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 
 We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Form S-8
(No.  333-157773 and 333-145234) of 3DIcon Corporation of our report
dated April 15, 2009 relating to our audits of the financial statements, which
appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2008.  Our report dated April 15, 2009, includes an emphasis paragraph
relating to uncertainty as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going
concern.
   /s/ HoganTaylor
LLP
   Tulsa,
Oklahoma
 April
15, 2009
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:98-cr-00019-MP-17

HARRY ALONSO,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 1567, Motion to unseal the remainder of the

documents that remain under seal by Harry Alonso. Defendant Harry Alonso is currently facing

extradition proceedings before the City of Westminster Magistrates’ court in London, England.

Defendant’s previous cooperation with U.S. authorities has become relevant in his extradition

proceedings. The Court previously unsealed defendant’s motion for substantial assistance. 

Defendant moves the Court to temporarily unseal the remaining documents to allow their

inspection by counsel. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of requested documents to defendant’s

counsel.

DONE AND ORDERED this 7th day of September, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:98-cr-00019-MP Document 1568 Filed 09/07/11 Page 1 of 1
49.607 Delinquency notices.

The formats of the delinquency notices in this section may be used to satisfy the requirements of

49.402-3. All notices will be sent with proof of delivery requested. (See subpart 42.13 for stop-work

orders.)

(a) Cure notice. If a contract is to be terminated for default before the delivery date, a "Cure Notice"

is required by the Default clause. Before using this notice, it must be ascertained that an amount of

time equal to or greater than the period of "cure" remains in the contract delivery schedule or any

extension to it. If the time remaining in the contract delivery schedule is not sufficient to permit a

realistic "cure" period of 10 days or more, the "Cure Notice" should not be issued. The "Cure Notice"

may be in the following format:

Cure Notice

You are notified that the Government considers your ____ [specify the contractor’s failure or failures]

a condition that is endangering performance of the contract. Therefore, unless this condition is

cured within 10 days after receipt of this notice [or insert any longer time that the Contracting

Officer may consider reasonably necessary], the Government may terminate for default under the

terms and conditions of the _______ [insert clause title] clause of this contract.

(End of notice)

(b) Show cause notice. If the time remaining in the contract delivery schedule is not sufficient to

permit a realistic "cure" period of 10 days or more, the following "Show Cause Notice" may be used.

It should be sent immediately upon expiration of the delivery period.

Show Cause Notice

Since you have failed to ____ [insert "perform Contract No. ___ within the time required by its terms,"

or "cure the conditions endangering performance under Contract No _____ as described to you in the

Government’s letter of _____ (date)"], the Government is considering terminating the contract under

the provisions for default of this contract. Pending a final decision in this matter, it will be necessary

to determine whether your failure to perform arose from causes beyond your control and without

fault or negligence on your part. Accordingly, you are given the opportunity to present, in writing,

any facts bearing on the question to ____ [insert the name and complete address of the contracting

officer], within 10 days after receipt of this notice. Your failure to present any excuses within this

time may be considered as an admission that none exist. Your attention is invited to the respective

rights of the Contractor and the Government and the liabilities that may be invoked if a decision is

made to terminate for default.

Any assistance given to you on this contract or any acceptance by the Government of delinquent

goods or services will be solely for the purpose of mitigating damages, and it is not the intention of

the Government to condone any delinquency or to waive any rights the Government has under the

contract.

(End of notice)

Parent topic: Subpart 49.6 - Contract Termination Forms and Formats
# 52.238 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**Subpart 52.2 - Text of Provisions and Clauses
5219.804-1 Agency evaluation.    (f) Agency reviews, in addition to the factors in FAR 19.803(a), may take the form of a technical presentation or should be structured in a manner that affords an exchange of information between the 8(a) firm and the contracting activity that will provide the 8(a) firm an adequate opportunity to demonstrate its capability and capacity to perform the requirement. For sole source 8(a) contracts, SBA regulations preclude the use of formal technical evaluations. Contracting officers, however, may conduct informal assessments of several 8(a) firms' capabilities to perform a specific requirement.       (S-90) When a lack of capability or capacity forms the basis for declination responses to SBA, such responses shall discuss factors such as the 8(a) contractor candidate's:       (1) lack of knowledge and understanding of the work to be performed;       (2) lack of experience in performing requirements of similar size and scope;       (3) lack of resources that are available (including contingent hires) or that must be acquired for contract performance;       (4) lack of ability to comply with subcontracting limitation provisions (see FAR clause 52.219-14);       (5) lack of ability to meet delivery schedules; and/or       (6) deficiencies in record of performance.       Contracting activities shall provide a copy of all 8(a) program declination letters to the Director, OSBP concurrent with submission to SBA. Declination letters are subject to direct appeal by the SBA Administrator to the Secretary of the Navy (see FAR 19.810). Contracting officers should coordinate such declinations with the activity small business specialist or the CCO. **Parent topic:** 5219.804 Evaluation, offering, and acceptance.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

WILLIE MCNAIR, )

)

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2:06-cv-695-WKW

)

RICHARD ALLEN, et al., )

)

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. )

____________________________________

)

JAMES CALLAHAN, )

)

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2:06-cv-919-WKW

)

RICHARD ALLEN, et al., )

)

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. )

ORDER

In light of the expert depositions taken recently, the parties may, but are not required to,

supplement their summary judgment briefing on or before September 27, 2007.

It is so ORDERED.

DONE this 24th day of September, 2007.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 115 Filed 09/24/2007 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, 

vs. CASE NO. 5:99-cr-4/RS

PHYNERRIAN Q. MANNING

Defendant. 

_________________________________________ /

UORDER

The relief requested in Defendant’s Motion to Transfer Appellant’s Pro Se Motion 

(Doc. 207) is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to transfer Defendant’s Pro Se Motion 

For Court to Take Judicial Notice (Doc. 206) to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in 

Defendant’s Circuit Court Case Number 09-14331-CC. 

ORDERED on November 18, 2010

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
#### § 900.24 Pre-hearing information sessions.

A pre-hearing information session may be held by the Secretary in response to any proposals received under § 900.3 of this part. Any person proposing an amendment to a Federal milk marketing agreement or order may request that a pre-hearing information session be held. A person submitting a proposal shall have up to 3 calendar days to modify or withdraw his or her proposal prior to the publication of a notice of hearing.