alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUBPART 48.1 – POLICIES AND PROCEDURES     **Parent topic:** PART 48 – VALUE ENGINEERING48.101 General.    (S-90) When a contracting officer receives a Value Engineering Change Proposal (VECP) from the contractor, the contracting officer / acquisition team shall:       (1) Acknowledge receipt within 5 business days.       (2) Provide a copy to the Program Management Office (PMO) and copy the DISA VE Senior Management Official in the DISA Office of the Component Acquisition Executive; the evaluation shall convene within 10 business days and the KO shall be notified of the acceptance or rejection within 15 business days.       (3) If additional information is needed, the PMO will notify the contractor, and copy the Contracting Officer and VE Senior Management Official. If negotiation of the VE is required, the KO shall lead the negotiations.       (4) If accepted, the KO shall execute a bilateral modification to the contract citing the VE clause in the contract as the authority for the modification.       (5) If VECP is not accepted, the KO will notify the Contractor in writing, with an explanation of why the VECP was not accepted. The KO will copy the PMO and the VE Senior Management Official.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

§ 868.314 Grade designation and other certificate information. ( a ) *Milled rice.* The grade designation for all classes of Milled rice shall be included on the certificate grade-line in the following order: ( 1 ) The letters “U.S.;”
( 2 ) The number of the grade or the words “Sample grade,” as warranted;
( 3 ) The words “or better,” when applicable and requested by the applicant prior to inspection; (Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0580-0013)
( 4 ) The class; and
( 5 ) Each applicable special grade (see § 868.316).
( b ) *Mixed Milled rice information.* For the class Mixed Milled rice, the following information shall be included in the Results section of the certificate in the following order: ( 1 ) The percentage of whole kernels of each type in the order of predominance;
( 2 ) The percentage of broken kernels of each type in the order of predominance, when applicable; and
( 3 ) The percentage of seeds and foreign material.
( c ) *Broken kernels.* Broken kernels, other than long grain in Mixed Milled rice shall be certified as “medium or short grain.”
[74 FR 55442, Oct. 28, 2009]
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3187 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 24, 2006 

Referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

AN ACT 

To designate the Post Office located at 5755 Post Road, 

East Greenwich, Rhode Island, as the ‘‘Richard L. Cevoli 

Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

S 3187 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. RICHARD L. CEVOLI POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The post office located at 5755 

3 Post Road, East Greenwich, Rhode Island, shall be known 

4 and designated as the ‘‘Richard L. Cevoli Post Office’’. 

5 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg6 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

7 States to the post office referred to in subsection (a) shall 

8 be deemed to be a reference to the Richard L. Cevoli Post 

9 Office. 

Passed the Senate July 20, 2006. 

Attest: EMILY J. REYNOLDS, 

Secretary. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
#### § 789.3 Program eligibility.

Certain programs that promote the national defense are eligible for priorities and allocations support. These include programs for military and energy production or construction, military or critical infrastructure assistance to any foreign nation, homeland security, stockpiling, space, and any directly related activity. Other eligible programs include emergency preparedness activities conducted pursuant to Title VI of the Stafford Act and critical infrastructure protection and restoration.
Subpart 5104.1 - Contract Execution

Parent topic: Part 5104 - Administrative Matters

5104.103 Contract clause.

Contracting officers will insert FAR clause 52.204-1, Approval of Contract, in solicitations and

contracts when an agency official other than the contracting officer is the approval authority.
Editorial Note on Part 782
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 782 appear at 61 FR 32643, June 25, 1996.

§ 782.20 Importer records and reports. ( a ) The importer shall retain a copy of each form: ( 1 ) FSA-750, End-Use Certificate for Wheat, that is submitted to KCCO in accordance with § 782.12(a); and
( 2 ) FSA-751, Wheat Consumption and Resale Report, that is submitted to KCCO in accordance with § 782.15(a)(1).
( b ) The importer shall maintain records to verify that the wheat was identity preserved until such time as the wheat was: ( 1 ) Loaded onto the conveyance for direct delivery to an end user, or
( 2 ) Delivered to an end user, or
( 3 ) Delivered to a subsequent buyer.
( c ) Copies of the documents, information, and records required in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section shall be kept on file at the importer's headquarters office or other location designated by the importer for the period specified in § 782.25.
# 5123.903 Contract clause.

The Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology) shall make the determination as described in FAR 23.903.   See Appendix GG for further delegation. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 5123.9 - Contractor Compliance With Environmental Management Systems
# L_2015066EN.01002102.xml

| 11.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 66/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 66/21

---

Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 810/2014 of 25 July 2014 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 221 of 25 July 2014
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 221 of 25 July 2014

On page 5, Section II of the Annex:

for:

| ‘II. | Entities undermining the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine’ |
| --- | --- |

‘II.

Entities undermining the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine’

,

read:

| ‘II. | Entities’ |
| --- | --- |

‘II.

Entities’

;

on page 8, Section III of the Annex:

| — | the heading of the Section ‘III. Entities whose ownership has been transferred contrary to Ukrainian law’ is deleted, |
| --- | --- |

—

the heading of the Section ‘III. Entities whose ownership has been transferred contrary to Ukrainian law’ is deleted,

| — | the entities in Section III are renumbered starting with number 10. |
| --- | --- |

—

the entities in Section III are renumbered starting with number 10.

---
# Subpart 5628.1 - BONDS

**Parent topic:**Part 5628 - BONDS AND INSURANCE

## 5628.103 Performance and Payment Bonds for Other than Construction Contracts.

### 5628.103-1 General.

Any decision to require performance and payment bonds for supply or service contracts must be approved by the Chief, Contracting Office, shall be obtained prior to issuance of the solicitation. The contract file will contain complete documentation of the rationale for the decision to require bonds.

## 5628.106 Administration.

### 5628.106-90 Review of Bonds and Notification of Surety.

All performance and payment bonds and all consents of surety shall be reviewed using the Air Force form 3012 or similar format. The review and documented in the contract file. When doubt of legal sufficiency exists, legal counsel shall be sought.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Pedro Heureaux, Appellant.

Submitted September 4, 2007;

decided September 6, 2007

Reported below, 33 AD3d 1020.

Motion for an extension of the time within which to apply for permission to appeal pursuant to CPL 460.20 granted and motion papers treated as a timely CPL 460.20 application.
Subpart 5631.2 - CONTRACTS WITH

COMMERCIAL ORGANIZATIONS

Parent topic: Part 5631 - CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES

5631.205 Selected Costs.

5631.205-32 PreContract Costs.

(Revised August 2017)

(a) Pre-Contract cost authorization shall be reviewed by legal counsel and approved by the cognizant

HCD or FCO before issuance. As a condition precedent to the use of a pre-contract cost agreement,

the correct type of funds must be available upon issuance of the pre-contract cost agreement.

Authorization must be in writing and shall address the following:

(i) The necessity for the contractor to initiate work prior to contract award

(ii) The start date of such contractor effort

(iii) The total estimated time of the advanced effort

(iv) The cost limitation

(b) Indicate on the Standard Form 26, Award/Contract, Block 15, and in Section G of any resultant

contract the date pre-contract costs were approved. This notifies the payment office that the precontract costs are allowable and that the contractor may be reimbursed. The effective date of the

contract shall be the date parties reach a bilateral agreement.

(c) Pre-contract cost authorization shall not be used to cover a period in excess of 30 days or

$100,000, unless a longer period/larger dollar threshold is approved by the HCA via a written

determination and findings that such an allowance is reasonable, and shall not be extended or

renewed.

(d) (Removed August 2017).

5631.205-46 Travel Costs (Removed August 2017).

HQ, United States Special Operations Command

Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L)

SOFARS 5631
February 2007
# 29.101 Resolving tax problems.

(a)(S-90) Contracting officers should request assistance from legal counsel and the PL842 Cost and Pricing Branch. PL842 can provide assistance on applicability and reasonableness prior to negotiations.

**Parent topic:**SUBPART 29.1 — GENERAL
#### § 52.1853 Grades of raisins with seeds—layer or cluster.

(a) “U.S. Grade A” is the quality of Layer or Cluster Raisins with Seeds that have similar varietal characteristics; that have a good typical color; that have a good characteristic flavor; that are uniformly cured and show development characteristics of raisins prepared from well-matured grapes; that contain not more than 23 percent, by weight, of moisture; that not less than 30 percent, by weight, of the raisins, exclusive of stems and branches, are 3-Crown size or larger; and that meet the following additional requirements as outlined in table 1 to this section.

(b) “U.S. Grade B” is the quality of Layer or Cluster Raisins with Seeds that have similar varietal characteristics that have a reasonably good typical color; that have a good characteristic flavor; that are uniformly cured and show development characteristics of raisins prepared from reasonably well-matured grapes; that contain not more than 23 percent, by weight, of the moisture, that not less than 30 percent, by weight, of the raisins exclusive of stems and branches, are 3-Crown size or larger; and that meet the additional requirements outlined in table 1 to this section.

(c) “Substandard” is the quality of Layer or Cluster Raisins with Seeds that fail to meet the requirements of U.S. Grade B.

| Defects | U.S. Grade A | U.S. Grade B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Maximum (percent by weight) |
| Sugared | 5 | 10 |
| Discolored, damaged, or moldy | 5 | 7 |
| Provided these limits are not exceeded: | | |
| Damaged | 3 | 4 |
| Moldy | 2 | 3 |
| Substandard development and undeveloped | 2 | 5 |

Table 1 to § 52.1853—Allowances for Defects in Layer or Cluster Raisins with Seeds

| Shattered (or loose) individual berries and small clusters of 2 or 3 berries each | Practically free | Reasonably free. |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Appearance or edibility of product |
| Slightly discolored or damaged by fermentation or any other defect not described above | May not be affected | May not be more than slightly affected. |

| Grit, sand, or silt | None of any consequence may be present that affects the appearance or edibility of the product. |
| --- | --- |

[41 FR 34751, Aug. 17, 1976. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977, and further redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981, as amended at 88 FR 71461, Oct. 17, 2023]
3.906 Remedies.     (a) The HCA is the designee.         ../media/DARS-image1.png **Parent topic:** SUBPART 3.9 — WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTIONS FOR CONTRACTOR EMPLOYEES
52.247-14 Contractor Responsibility for Receipt of Shipment.       As prescribed in 47.207-5(d), insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts for transportation or for transportation-related services:          Contractor Responsibility for Receipt of Shipment (Apr 1984)          The Contractor shall diligently count and examine all goods tendered for shipment, receipt for them, and make appropriate written exception for any goods not in apparent good order.          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.247 [Reserved]
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 36-2 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 36-2 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 36-2 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 36-2 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 4 of 4
JUDGMENT

Court of Appeals 

 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-13-00511-CV

KELLI MCDONALD SYDOW, Appellant

V.

MICHAEL DAVID SYDOW, Appellee

Appeal from the 308th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2010-02710).

This case is an appeal from the order signed by the trial court on May 17, 2013. 

After submitting the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by 

the parties, the Court holds that the trial court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction to issue 

the May 17, 2013 order. Accordingly, the Court dismisses the appeal.

The Court orders that the appellee, Michael David Sydow, pay all appellate costs.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered April 7, 2015.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Lloyd. Opinion delivered 

by Justice Lloyd.
Exhibit No. 32.1
----------------
Form 10-KSB
BTHC X, Inc.
File No.  0-52237


          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of BTHC X, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Timothy P. Halter,
Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

   (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) the information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects,  the financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
       Company.


Date: February 19, 2007                               By:      Timothy P. Halter
      -----------------                                  -----------------------
                                                               Timothy P. Halter
                                                             Chief Executive and
                                                         Chief Financial Officer

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to BTHC X, Inc. and will be retained by BTHC X, Inc.  and  furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3181 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3181

      To extend the duty suspension on ORGASOL polyamide powders.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

  Mr. Bunning introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To extend the duty suspension on ORGASOL polyamide powders.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ORGASOL POLYAMIDE POWDERS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.39.08 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to ORGASOL polyamide powders) 
is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the date that is 15 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 763.21 Establishment of Federal debt and Agency recovery of loss claim payments. ( a ) Any amount paid by FSA as a result of an approved loss claim is immediately due and payable by the buyer after FSA notifies the buyer that a loss claim has been paid to the seller. If the debt is not restructured into a repayment plan or the obligation otherwise cured, FSA may use all remedies available, including offset as authorized by the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996, to collect the debt. ( 1 ) Interest on the debt will be at the FLP non-program real property loan rate in effect at the time of the first Agency payment of a loss claim.
( 2 ) The debt may be scheduled for repayment consistent with the buyer's repayment ability, not to exceed 7 years. Before any payment plan can be approved, the buyer must provide the Agency with the best lien obtainable on all of the buyer's assets. This includes the buyer's ownership interest in the real estate under contract for guarantees using the prompt payment guarantee plan. When the buyer is an entity, the best lien obtainable will be taken on all of the entity's assets, and all assets owned by individual members of the entity, including their ownership interest in the real estate under contract.
( b ) Annually, buyers with an Agency approved repayment plan under this section will supply the Agency a current balance sheet, income statement, cash flow budget, complete copy of Federal income tax returns, and any additional information needed to analyze the buyer's financial condition.
( c ) If a buyer fails to make required payments to the Agency as specified in the approved repayment plan, the debt will be treated as a non-program loan debt, and servicing will proceed as specified in § 766.351(c) of this chapter.
Part 5214 - SEALED BIDDING

Subpart 5214.4 - OPENING OF BIDS AND AWARD OF CONTRACT

5214.401 Receipt and safeguarding of bids.

5214.407 Mistakes in bids.

5214.407-3 Other mistakes disclosed before award.

Subpart 5214.4 - OPENING OF BIDS AND AWARD OF

CONTRACT

5214.401 Receipt and safeguarding of bids.

(a) Contracting offices should ensure that bids are promptly identified and forwarded, unopened, for

deposit in the bid box. Bid envelopes received by mail should be time-stamped immediately upon

receipt. Hand-carried bids may not be accepted by government employees but are to be deposited in

the bid box by the bidder or his representative. Insofar as possible, bid samples should receive the

same degree of security as is afforded bids, and should be accounted for by the maintenance of local

records. Under no circumstances are bid samples to be given away, loaned, diverted, or used for any

purpose other than that intended.

5214.407 Mistakes in bids.

5214.407-3 Other mistakes disclosed before award.

(e) HCAs, without power of redelegation, may make the determinations required by FAR 14.407-3(a),

(b) and (d).
# .~vEr~oNr

Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation Agency ofNatural Resources Air PollutionControl Division 103 South Main Street, 3South [phone] 8o2-24i-384o Waterbury, VT o567i-o4o2 [fax] 8o2-24i-259o January 3, 2012 H . Curtis Spalding, Regional Administrator EPA New

England, Region 1 5 Post Office Square - Suite 100 Boston, MA 02109-3912 

### Re: Regional Haze State Implementation Plan Dear Regional Administrator Spalding: On August 31, 2009, the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation submitted a final Regional Haze State Implementation Plan (SIP) to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) . One of the elements of Vermont's long term

strategy to reduce regional haze was a commitment to adopt a rule to reduce the sulfur content of fuel oils. On September 28, 2011, theVermont Air Pollution Control Division (APCD) adopted amendments to section 5- 221(1) of the Vermont Air Pollution Control Regulations to adopt the regional low sulfur fuel strategy outlined in Vermont's Regional Haze SIP. These amendments took effect on October 14, 2011 . The APCD is now submitting the amended rule to EPA for approval as part ofVermont's Regional Haze SIP . In support of this submittal, please find enclosed the following documents: 1 . A copy of the amended rule and supporting documentation 2. Memorandum

fromthe Secretary of State's Office 3. A copy of the public notices 4. Certification pursuant to 40 CFR § 51 .102 5. List of witnesses, summary of comments received, and responses to comments 6. Technical support document required by 40 CFR Part 51, App. V, § 2.2 Should you have any questions about this submittal, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Richard A. Valentinetti, Director Air Pollution Control Division Enclosures Cc: Dave Conroy, Director, Air Programs Branch, EPA New England, Region 1 E-copy: Anne Arnold, Manager, Air Quality Planning Unit, EPA Region 1

Anne, McWilliams, Envt'1 Scientist, Air Quality Planning Unit, EPA Region 1 Heidi Hales, APCD Planning Section Chief Elaine 0'Grady, APCDCounsel Topreserve, enhance, restore, and conserve Vermont's natural resources, andprotect human health,for the benefit ofthis andfuture generations.
Subpart 5212.1 - ACQUISITION OF

COMMERCIAL ITEMS - GENERAL

Parent topic: Part 5212 - ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL ITEMS

5212.102 Applicability.

(a)(i)(C) If market research and analysis yields that expert and consultant services are commercial

items (as defined in FAR 2.101), the concurrence of DASN(P) shall be obtained on the required

determination. Determinations shall be submitted by email with a copy of the approved AS, STRAP,

or MOPAS-S using usn.pentagon.asstsecnavrdadc.mbx.pabt@us.navy.mil with the subject “[Activity

Name] NMCARS 5212.102 – D&F for Expert and Consultant Commercial Services.”

(f)(1) HCAs are delegated the authority to make the determinations described in FAR 12.102 (f)(1).
Exhibit 32.1

Obagi Medical Products, Inc.    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Obagi Medical Products, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven R. Carlson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|Date: March 4, 2008 |  |                                                                                            
|------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  | /s/STEVEN R. CARLSONSteven R. Carlson Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

---



QuickLinks
Case 2:06-cv-00649-WHA-WC Document 9 Filed 08/01/2006 Page 1 of 1