alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Clement Jones, Appellant, v Richard A. Keenan, as Monroe County Judge, et al., Respondents.

Submitted August 6, 2007;

decided October 16, 2007

On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. Motion for leave to appeal denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

January 5, 2007

 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT

To: All Counsel of Record

Re: Strickland et al v. Champion Enterprises, Inc. et al

Civil Action No. 1:06-cv-00682-DRB

The above-styled case has been reassigned to Judge Terry F. Moorer.

Please note that the case number is now 1:06-cv-00682-TFM. 

This new case number should be used on all future correspondence and pleadings in this

action.

 

Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 32 Filed 01/05/2007 Page 1 of 1
Subpart 407.1 - Acquisition Plans

Parent topic: PART 407 - ACQUISITION PLANNING

407.103 Agency-head responsibilities.

Heads of Contracting Activities (HCA's) shall develop procedures to comply with FAR 7.103.

407.170 Advance acquisition plans.

Each HCA shall maintain an advance acquisition planning system.
## Conference Call Between Veolia Environmental Services (Veolia) and EPA

March 8, 2012 (10:00 am

– 12:00 noon )

Call

- in information :

Toll

- free dial

- in number : (877) 226

- 9607

P articipant c onference c ode: 6693830375

1. Introductions

2. Purpose of the call

3. Veolia’s significant modification request

a. Extrapolation of metal fe ed rate s

o What is EPA’s position on Veolia’s proposed extrapolation rates?

b. Feedstream Analysis Plan

o 40 C.F.R. §63.1209(c) requires e a ch subject facility to have a feedstream analysis plan (FAP) “that is sufficient to document compliance with the applicable fee d rate limits.” What is EPA’s position on Veolia’s FAP?

c. Ongoing enforcement issues

o As part of an enforcement investigation, t he National Enforcement Investigations Center (NEIC) inspected Veolia’s Sauget facility in late 2008. How could the findings of that investigation affect EPA’s decision on the significant modification request?

4. O ther topics as necessary

### March 8 , 2012 Meeting With Veolia Page 2 of 2

Table 1. Veolia's Proposed Operating Parameter Limits (OPLs)

Col. ID 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Unit # Metal Metal

Feed

Rates During

2008 Testing (lb/hr) a EPA

Revised

Metal Feed

Rates During

2008 Testing (lb/hr) b Highest

12

- hr Rolling Average

Metal

Feed Rate

7/1/04

- 1/1/08 (lb/hr) Test Feed

Rate As a %

of the Highest 12

- hr Rolling Average of

Historical

Values Veolia’s

3/2/10 Proposed Extrapola

ted

Feedrate (lb/hr) c Est. Stack

Conc. @

Veolia's Proposed

OPLs ( μ g/dscm @

7% O 2 ) d HWC

MACT Limit (40 C.F.R. § 63.1219); μg/dscm @

7% O 2

2 Hg 0.00185 0.00165 0.0054 34% 0.0057 182 130

LVM 46.8 47.2 84.5 55% 140 20 92

SVM 62.9 63.6 50.6 124% 189 65 230

3 Hg 0.00185 0.0018 0.00545 34% 0.0057 178 130

LVM 47.7 47.7 77.3 62% 143 70 92

SVM 64.3 64.3 72.1 89% 193 173 230

4 Hg 0.026 0.0214 0.05981 43% 0.078 87 130

LVM 50.3 50.3 69.9 72% 151 30 92

SVM 63.6 63.6 58.4 109% 191 81 230



### Table Notes:

a. Feed rate calculated by EPA (& proposed by Veolia in the 2010 application) from offsite spike rates and PSC Republic’s moisture content.

b. Feed rate calculated by EPA in March 2010 using calculated Hg spike composition &

offsite waste feed concentrati ons.

c. Calculated by escalating the metal feed rate during testing (Column 2) by a factor of 3.

d. Stack concentrations are estimated from exhaust parameters and the "removal efficiencies" reported by Veolia in the March 2010 application.
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS
E ASTLAND , T EXAS
J UDGMENT

Kevin Keith Beard
, * From the 363rd District Court of Dallas County, Trial Court No. F

- 1060635

- W.

Vs. No. 11

- 13

- 0012 3

- CR * August 7, 2014

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Willson, J. (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson , J. , and Bailey, J. )
This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opi nion, w e modify the judgment of the trial court to reflect that Kevin Keith Beard entered a plea of “NOT TRUE” to the allegations in the State’s motion to adjudicate. As modified, we affirm.
1306.501 Requirement.

The designee authorized to designate a Competition Advocate for the Department and each

procuring activity is set forth in CAM 1301.70.

Parent topic: Subpart 1306.5 - Competition Advocates
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3124 

To suspend temporarily the duty on ski boots, cross country ski footwear 

and snowboard boots. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. LEAHY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on ski boots, cross country 

ski footwear and snowboard boots. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF CERTAIN EXISTING DUTY SUS4 PENSIONS AND REDUCTIONS. 

5 (a) OTHER MODIFICATIONS.— 

6 (1) SNOWBOARD BOOTS.—Heading 9902.64.04 

7 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 

8 States is amended— 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

S 3124 IS 

1 (A) by striking ‘‘Snowboard’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘Ski boots, cross country ski footwear and 

3 snowboard’’; 

4 (B) by striking ‘‘4%’’ and inserting 

5 ‘‘Free’’; and 

6 (C) by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

9 subsection (a) apply to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
#### § 945.28 Vacancies.

To fill any vacancy occasioned by the failure of any person selected as a committee member or as an alternate to qualify, or in the event of the death, removal, resignation, or disqualification of any qualified member or alternate, a successor for his unexpired term may be selected by the Secretary from nominations made in the manner specified in § 945.25 or the Secretary may select such committee member or alternate from previously unselected nominees on the current nominee list from the district involved. If the names of nominees to fill any such vacancy are not made available to the Secretary within 30 days after such vacancy occurs, the Secretary may fill such vacancy without regard to nominations, which selection shall be made on the basis of the representation provided for in § 945.24.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Authority:

7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 800.146 Maintenance and retention of records issued by the Service under the Act.

Agencies, contractors, and approved scale testing organizations shall maintain complete records of the Act, regulations, the standards, any instructions issued by the Service, and all amendments and revisions thereto. These records shall be maintained until superseded or revoked.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0580-0011)
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Authority:

7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 800.60 Deceptive actions and practices.

In the absence of prior adequate notice to appropriate official personnel, any action or practice, including the loading, weighing, handling, or sampling of grain that knowingly causes or is an attempt to cause the issuance by official personnel of a false or incorrect official certificate or other official form, is deemed to be deceptive and, as such, is a violation of section 13(a)(3) of the Act. For the purposes of this paragraph, adequate notice is written or oral notice given to an agency or the Service, as applicable, before official personnel begin to perform official inspection or weighing services. If oral notice is given, it must be confirmed in writing within 2 business days. To be adequate, the notice must explain the nature and extent of the action or practice in question and must identify the grain, stowage container, equipment, facility, and the official personnel actually or potentially involved.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0580-0011)

[48 FR 17330, Apr. 22, 1983, as amended at 48 FR 44453, Sept. 29, 1983; 54 FR 5924, Feb. 7, 1989]
#### § 981.70 Records and verification.

Each handler shall keep records which will clearly show the details of his or her receipts of almonds, withholdings, sales, shipments, inventories, reserve disposition, advertising and promotion activities, as well as other pertinent information regarding his or her operation pursuant to the provisions of this part: *Provided,* that, such records shall be kept in the State of California. Such records shall be retained by the handler for 2 years after the end of the crop year to which they apply. Each handler's premises shall be accessible to authorized representatives of the Board and the Secretary for examination and audit of the aforesaid records and for inspection and observation of almonds. The Board shall make such checks of almonds or audits of each handler's records as it deems appropriate or are requested by the Secretary to ensure that accurate information as required in this part is being furnished by handlers.

[35 FR 11372, July 16, 1970, as amended at 37 FR 3984, Feb. 25, 1972; 61 FR 32921, June 26, 1996; 88 FR 82235, Nov. 24, 2023]
**Exhibit 23.1**

[LETTERHEAD OF EHRHARDT KEEFE STEINER & HOTTMAN PC] 

**Consent of Independent Registered PublicAccounting Firm**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-144102) of Allied Nevada GoldCorp. (the “Company”) of our report dated March 6, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements of the Company included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007. 

/s/ Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC 

Ehrhardt KeefeSteiner & Hottman PC 

Denver, Colorado 

March 6,2008
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

 

NICHOLAS STRICKLAND, et al., * 

 * 

 Plaintiffs, * 

 * 

v. * Case Number: 1:06-CV-00682-TFM 

 * 

CHAMPION HOME BUILDERS CO., 

INC., et al., 

*

* 

 

 * UNOPPOSED 

 Defendants. * 

MOTION TO STAY-PENDING SETTLEMENT

COMES NOW the Defendant, Champion Home Builders Co., the remaining 

Defendant in the above matter and with consent of all parties, moves for a stay of this 

action pending the settlement, and as grounds therefore states as follows: 

1. This case is one of several similar cases filed in this state and other states 

with regard to wallboard issues in manufactured housing. 

2. A tentative settlement agreement has been reached in this and over 100 

similar such matters. 

3. The parties request a stay of ninety (90) days in order to consummate the 

settlement and obtain signatures on the settlement documentation and releases. 

4. The parties represent to the Court that should this case not settle, counsel 

will provide to the Court on or before the expiration of the ninety (90) day period a joint 

proposed scheduling order, resetting all existing deadlines previously set by this Court. 

5. No party will be prejudiced by the stay of this case and all deadlines, 

including a continuation of the trial setting if the case does not settle. 

Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 69 Filed 04/07/2008 Page 1 of 2
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Champion Home Builders Co. 

prays that this case will be stayed for ninety (90) days, pending settlement, and for such 

and other different relief as is just.

 

 Respectfully submitted, 

RITCHEY & SIMPSON, PLLC 

/s/ Gregory S. Ritchey

Gregory S. Ritchey, Esquire {ASB-8193-H68G} 

Richard S. Walker, Esquire {ASB-8719-L70R}

 Counsel for Champion Home Builders Co. 

OF COUNSEL:

RITCHEY & SIMPSON, PLLC 

3288 Morgan Drive, Suite 100 

Birmingham, AL 35216-3084 

Phone: 205.876.1600 

Facsimile 205.876.1616 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I, the undersigned, do hereby certify that on the 7th day of April, 2008, I 

electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of Court using the electronic filing 

system which will send notification of the foregoing upon the following: 

Jere L. Beasley, Esquire 

W. Daniel Miles, III, Esquire 

C. Gibson Vance, Esquire 

C. Lance Gould, Esquire 

BEASLEY, ALLEN, CROW, 

METHVIN, PORTIS & MILES, P.C. 

Post Office Box 4160 

Montgomery, AL 36103 

/s/ Gregory S. Ritchey

OF COUNSEL 

Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 69 Filed 04/07/2008 Page 2 of 2
----- F o r wa r ded b y B r i an S h r a g e r / R T P / U S E PA

/ U S on 02 / 18 / 2011 03 : 16 PM

-----
F r o m: " Higgi n s , Co r t n e y " < Co r t ne y _Hi g gin s @ o m b

. eop

. go v> T o: T h o m a s G illi s / DC / U SEP A / U S @ E P A
, R o be r tJ W a y l and / R T P / U SE P A

/ U S @ E P A
, Br ian S h r age r / R T P / U S EP A

/ U S @ EPA Da t e: 01 / 28 / 2011 11 : 06 AM S ubje c t: R E : E

. O. 1 2 866 M e e t i n g o n B oil e r MA CT

Hi all, Con s i s t en t w i t h E

. O. 12 8 66
, a tt a c hed i s t he hando u t p r o v ide d b y A P I at t he m e e t i n g t oda y

. P lea s e le t m e k now i f y o u ha v e an y que s t ion s.
Rega r d s, Co r t ney

----- O r i g inal A ppoin t m en t

- - --- F r o m : E c ho l s , M abel E. S en t : M onda y , J a n ua ry 24
, 2011 4 : 17 PM T o : E c h ol s , M abel E

. ; Ne y land
, K e v i n F

. ; M a n c i ni
, Do m in i c J

. ; Higg i n s, Co r t ne y ; Le e , A m a nda I .; M a c Neil
, J ohn S .; Ra ck o ff

, J ona t han E .; t s i r igo t i s

. p e t e r @ epa m ail

. epa

. go v; w a y l and

. r obe r t j @ ep a m a il

. epa

. go v; gil l i s

. t ho m a s @ e p a

. g ov S ubje c t: E

. O

. 12866 M ee t ing on B o i le r MA CT W h en : F r i da y , J anua ry 28
, 2 011 10 : 00 AM- 10 : 30 A M ( U T C

- 05 : 00 ) E a s t e rn T i m e ( U S & Canad a ). W h e r e : 101 0 3 N E OB

W h en : F r i da y , J anua ry 28
, 2 011 10 : 00 AM- 10 : 30 A M ( U T C

- 05 : 00 ) E a s t e rn T i m e ( U S & Canad a ). W h e r e : 101 0 3 N E OB

No t e : T he G M T o f

f s e t abo v e doe s no t r e f le c t d a y l igh t s a v in g t i me ad j u s t m en t s.

* ~ * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~*

K ha ry C a u t h e n , A P I ha s r eque s t ed t hi s m ee t ing

. ( S e e a tt a c hed f i le: Hand o u t

_ B oi l e rs

_

A P I

_ J an2820 1 1

. p d f)
5106.502-90 Supplementary information.

Command advocates for competition should provide supplementary information on items considered

significant to the AAFC at any time during the fiscal year.

Parent topic: 5106.502 Duties and responsibilities.
1313.305-1 General.

(a) Third-party drafts. Third-party drafts are not authorized for use by Department of Commerce

agencies.

(b) Imprest Funds. The Imprest Fund Policy Directive, issued November 9, 1999, by the Department

of Treasury, required that all Federal agencies eliminate agency use of imprest funds by October 1,

2001, except where provided under the Imprest Fund Policy Directive. Requests for exceptions to

the requirements of the Imprest Fund Policy Directive should be addressed to DOC's Director of

Financial Management. In the case of an approved exception, DOC's procedures for using imprest

funds can be found in the Cash Management Policies and Procedures Handbook, available at the

Department of Commerce, Office of Financial Management Web site. A copy of all approved

exceptions shall be submitted to the Senior Bureau Procurement Official.

Parent topic: Subpart 1313.3 - Simplified Acquisitions Methods
Editorial Note on Part 91
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 91 appear at 61 FR 51350, Oct. 2 1996.

§ 91.39 Premium hourly fee rates for overtime and legal holiday service. ( a ) When analytical testing in a Science and Technology facility requires the services of laboratory personnel beyond their regularly assigned tour of duty on any day or on a day outside the established schedule, such services are considered as overtime work. When analytical testing in a Science and Technology facility requires the services of laboratory personnel on a Federal holiday or a day designated in lieu of such a holiday, such services are considered holiday work. Laboratory analyses initiated at the request of the applicant to be rendered on Federal holidays, and on an overtime basis will be charged fees based on the formulas in § 91.37.
( b ) Information on legal holidays or what constitutes overtime service at a particular Science and Technology laboratory is available from the Laboratory Director or facility manager.
[75 FR 17288, Apr. 6, 2010, as amended at 79 FR 67326, Nov. 13, 2014]
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Video Display Corporation;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 c)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.
 Date: October 15, 2008
    /s/ Ronald D. OrdwayRonald D. OrdwayChief Executive Officer
#### § 958.73 Effect of termination or amendment.

Unless otherwise expressly provided by the Secretary, the termination of this subpart or of any regulation issued pursuant to this subpart, or the issuance of any amendment to either thereof, shall not (a) affect or waive any right, duty, obligation, or liability which shall have arisen or which may thereafter arise in connection with any provision of this subpart or of any regulation issued under this subpart; (b) release or extinguish any violation of this subpart or of any regulations issued under this subpart; or (c) affect or impair any rights or remedies of the Secretary or of any other person with respect to any such violations.
§ 958.56 Safeguards. ( a ) The committee, with the approval of the Secretary, may prescribe adequate safeguards to prevent onions shipped, ( 1 ) Pursuant to § 958.53 or § 958.54; or
( 2 ) To commercial dehydrators for processing by such dehydrators into dehydrated onion products, from entering channels of trade for other than the purpose authorized therefor.
( b ) The committee, with the approval of the Secretary, may also prescribe rules and regulations governing the issuance, and the contents, of Certificates of Privilege if such certificates are prescribed as safeguards by the committee. Such safeguards may include requirements that: ( 1 ) Handlers shall first file applications with the committee to ship such onions;
( 2 ) Handlers shall obtain inspection provided by § 958.60, or pay the pro rata share of expenses provided by § 958.42, or both, in connection with such onions; and
( 3 ) Handlers shall obtain Certificates of Privilege from the committee prior to effecting the particular onion shipment.
( c ) The committee may rescind any Certificate of Privilege, or refuse to issue any Certificate of Privilege to any handler if proof is obtained that onions shipped by him for the purposes stated in the Certificate of Privilege were handled contrary to the provisions of this part.
( d ) The Secretary shall have the right to modify, change, alter, or rescind any safeguards prescribed and any certificates issued by the committee pursuant to the provisions of this section.
( e ) The committee shall make reports to the Secretary, as requested, showing the number of applications for such certificates, the quantity of onions covered by such applications, the number of such applications denied and certificates granted, the quantity of onions handled under duly issued certificates, and such other information as may be requested.
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 40 Filed 01/18/2007 Page 1 of 3Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 40 Filed 01/18/2007 Page 2 of 3Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 40 Filed 01/18/2007 Page 3 of 3