alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Centenary International Corporation
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Carlos
      Fabian De Sousa ,
      Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
      the
      best of my knowledge:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





/s/
                Carlos Fabian De SousaCarlos
                Fabian De SousaChief
                Executive OfficerNovember
                6, 2008





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing
      certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q solely pursuant to
      section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and are not being
      filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure
      document.
#### § 58.34 Suspension or revocation of license.

For good cause and in instances of willful wrongdoing, the Administrator may suspend any license issued under the regulations in this subpart by giving notice of such suspension to the respective individual involved, accompanied by a statement of reasons therefor. Within 10 days after receipt of the aforesaid notice and statement of reasons by such individual, he may file an appeal in writing with the Administrator supported by any argument or evidence that he may wish to offer as to why his license should not be suspended or revoked. In conjunction therewith, he may request and, in such event, shall be accorded an oral hearing. After consideration of such argument and evidence, the Administrator will take such action as warranted with respect to such suspension or revocation. When no appeal is filed within the prescribed 10 days, the license is revoked.
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 3 Filed 08/02/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 3 Filed 08/02/2006 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00658-TFM Document 21 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00658-TFM Document 21 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00658-TFM Document 21 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00658-TFM Document 21 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 4 of 4
§ 948.77 Assessments. ( a ) The funds to cover each area committee's expenses shall be acquired by the levying of assessments upon handlers as provided in this subpart. Each handler who first handles potatoes under this part, shall pay assessments to his respective area committee upon demand, which assessments shall be in payment of such handler's pro rata share of the area committee's expenses.
( b ) Assessments shall be levied upon handlers at rates established by the Secretary. Such rates may be established upon the basis of each area committee's budget, recommendations, and other available information. Such rates may be applied to specified containers used in the production area.
( c ) At any time during, or subsequent to, a given fiscal period each area committee may recommend the approval of an amended budget and an increase in the rate of assessment. Upon the basis of such recommendations, or other available information, the Secretary may approve an amended budget and increase the rate of assessment. Such increase shall be applicable to all potatoes grown within the particular area where an area committee recommends such increase and which were handled by the first handler thereof during such fiscal period.
( d ) The payment of assessments for the maintenance and functioning of each area committee may be required under this part throughout the period it is in effect irrespective to whether particular provisions thereof are suspended or become inoperative.
( e ) In order to provide funds to enable each area committee to perform its functions under this part, handlers may make advance payment of assessments.
§ 718.108 Measuring acreage including skip row acreage. ( a ) When one crop is alternating with another crop, whether or not both crops have the same growing season, only the acreage that is actually planted to the crop being measured will be considered to be acreage devoted to the measured crop.
( b ) Subject to the provisions of this paragraph and section, whether planted in a skip row pattern or without a pattern of skipped rows, the entire acreage of the field or subdivision may be considered as devoted to the crop only where the distance between the rows, for all rows, is 40 inches or less. If there is a skip that creates idle land wider than 40 inches, or if the distance between any rows is more than 40 inches, then the area planted to the crop shall be considered to be that area which would represent the smaller of; a 40 inch width between rows, or the normal row spacing in the field for all other rows in the field—those that are not more than 40 inches apart. The allowance for individual rows would be made based on the smaller of actual spacing between those rows or the normal spacing in the field. For example, if the crop is planted in single, wide rows that are 48 inches apart, only 20 inches to either side of each row (for a total of 40 inches between the two rows) could, at a maximum, be considered as devoted as the crop and normal spacing in the field would control. Half the normal distance between rows will also be allowed beyond the outside planted rows not to exceed 20 inches and will reflect normal spacing in the field.
( c ) In making calculations under this section, further reductions may be made in the acreage considered planted if it is determined that the acreage is more sparsely planted than normal using reasonable and customary full production planting techniques.
( d ) The Deputy Administrator has the discretionary authority to allow row allowances other than those specified in this section in those instances in which crops are normally planted with spacings greater or less than 40 inches, such as in case of tobacco, or where other circumstances are present which the Deputy Administrator finds justifies that allowance.
( e ) Paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section shall apply with respect to the 2003 and subsequent crops. For preceding crops, the rules in effect on January 1, 2002, shall apply.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

PATRICK O'NEAL HEARD, #165216, )

)

 Petitioner, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06-CV-691-WHA

)

SYLVESTER FOLKS, et al., )

)

 Respondents. )

ORDER ON MOTION

Upon consideration of the motion for extension of time filed by the respondents on

August 28, 2006 (Court Doc. No. 8), and for good cause, it is

ORDERED that this motion be and is hereby GRANTED. It is further 

ORDERED that the respondents be GRANTED an extension from August 28, 2006

to and including September 18, 2006 to file their answer to the petition. 

Done this 29th day of August, 2006.

/s/ Vanzetta Penn McPherson

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 3:06-cv-00691-WHA-WC Document 9 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 237 (Friday, December 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 76953]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31103]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board


Foreign-Trade Zone 238--Dublin, VA Site Renumbering Notice

    Foreign-Trade Zone 238 was approved by the Foreign-Trade Zones 
Board on August 5, 1999 (Board Order 1047).
    FTZ 238 currently consists of 1 ``site'' totaling 50 acres in the 
Dublin area. The current update does not alter the physical boundaries 
that have previously been approved, but instead involves an 
administrative renumbering that separates certain non-contiguous sites 
for recordkeeping purposes.
    Under this revision, the site list for FTZ 238 will be as follows: 
Site 1 (35 acres)--within the New River Valley Airport on VA Route 100, 
Dublin; and, Site 2 (15 acres)--located at 4100 Bob White Boulevard, 
Pulaski.
    For further information, contact Maureen Hinman at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0c616d797e69696222646562616d624c787e6d6869226b637a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7c111d090e19191252141512111d123c080e1d1819521b130a">[email protected]</span></a> or (202) 482-0627.

    Dated: December 1, 2010.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-31103 Filed 12-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2634 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to strike the term of the positions 

Under Secretary for Health and the Under Secretary for Benefits and 

simplify appointments to such positions. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 24, 2006 

Mr. CRAIG introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to strike the term 

of the positions Under Secretary for Health and the 

Under Secretary for Benefits and simplify appointments 

to such positions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITIES ON APPOINT4 MENT OF THE UNDER SECRETARY FOR 

5 HEALTH AND THE UNDER SECRETARY FOR 

6 BENEFITS. 

7 (a) UNDER SECRETARY FOR HEALTH.— 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•S 2634 IS

1 (1) REPEAL OF TERM OF OFFICE.—Section 305 

2 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by strik3 ing subsection (c). 

4 (2) REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT FOR COMMIS5 SION ON APPOINTMENT.—Such section is further 

6 amended by striking subsection (d). 

7 (b) UNDER SECRETARY FOR BENEFITS.— 

8 (1) REPEAL OF TERM OF OFFICE.—Section 306 

9 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by strik10 ing subsection (c). 

11 (2) REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT FOR COMMIS12 SION ON APPOINTMENT.—Such section is further 

13 amended by striking subsection (d). 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
§ 905.4 Fruit. *Fruit* means any or all varieties of the following types of citrus fruits grown in the production area: ( a ) Citrus sinensis, Osbeck, commonly called “oranges”;
( b ) Citrus paradisi, MacFadyen, commonly called “grapefruit”;
( c ) Citrus reticulata, commonly called “tangerines” or “mandarin”;
( d ) Citrus maxima Merr (L.); Osbeck, commonly called “pummelo”; and,
( e ) “Citrus hybrids” that are hybrids between or among one or more of the four fruits in paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section and the following: Trifoliate orange (Poncirus trifoliata), sour orange (C. aurantium), lemon (C. limon), lime (C. aurantifolia), citron (C. medica), kumquat (Fortunella species), tangelo (C. reticulata x C. paradisi or C. grandis), tangor (C. reticulata x C. sinensis), and varieties of these species. In addition, citrus hybrids include: Tangelo (C. reticulata x C. paradisi or C. grandis), tangor (C. reticulata x C. sinensis), Temple oranges, and varieties thereof
[81 FR 10454, Mar. 1, 2016]
§ 66.5 Exemptions. This part shall not apply to the food and entities described in this section. ( a ) Food served in a restaurant or similar retail food establishment.
( b ) Very small food manufacturers.
( c ) A food in which no ingredient intentionally contains a bioengineered (BE) substance, with an allowance for inadvertent or technically unavoidable BE presence of up to five percent (5%) for each ingredient.
( d ) A food derived from an animal shall not be considered a bioengineered food solely because the animal consumed feed produced from, containing, or consisting of a bioengineered substance.
( e ) Food certified under the National Organic Program.
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 64 Filed 01/03/2008 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 64 Filed 01/03/2008 Page 2 of 6
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 64 Filed 01/03/2008 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 64 Filed 01/03/2008 Page 4 of 6
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 64 Filed 01/03/2008 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 64 Filed 01/03/2008 Page 6 of 6
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

BLACKBERRY LTD.,

Appellant

v.

GOOGLE LLC,

Appellee

______________________

2019-1145

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017-

00913.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

CHING-LEE FUKUDA, Sidley Austin LLP, New York, 

NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by SHARON 

LEE; SAMUEL DILLON, Washington, DC. 

 NAVEEN MODI, Paul Hastings LLP, Washington, DC, 

argued for appellee. Also represented by PHILLIP W.

CITROEN, STEPHEN BLAKE KINNAIRD, SEONGHEE EMILY LEE,

JOSEPH PALYS. 

______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

 PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and 

HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 January 13, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
Case 2:06-cv-00650-MEF-SRW Document 5 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 1 of 1
6.303-90 Amendment/Modification Justification format.    (a) The J&A shall clearly reflect the amendment/modification changes in bold text and separate from the original approved J&A text.       (b) The title of the Justification should read: If prior to award “Amendment Justification”; if after award “Modification Justification”.       (c) The Justification posting requirements remain unchanged from the original Justification posting requirements. **Parent topic:** SUBPART 6.3 — OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
§ 51.2740 Minor defects. *Minor defects* means that the peanut kernel is not damaged but is affected by one or more of the following: ( a ) Skin discoloration which is dark brown, dark gray, dark blue or black and covers more than one-fourth of the surface;
( b ) Flesh discoloration which is darker than a light yellow color or consists of more than a slight yellow pitting of the flesh;
( c ) Sprout extending more than one-eighth of an inch from the tip of the kernel; and,
( d ) Dirt when the surface of the kernel is distinctly dirty, and its appearance is materially affected.
19.808-1 Sole source.    (a) The justification is included (in the template) in the 8(a) Sole Source Market Research Report.       (b) If a sole source requirement exceeds $100M, a J&A must be executed in accordance with DARS PGI 6.303-1 (S-90)       (c) If a sole source exceeds the competitive 8(a) threshold, the HCA will coordinate the request with the Director, OSBP. HCA approval will be provided via email, copy furnished to the Director of the OSBP. The Director, OSBP will concur on the DD2579. **Parent topic:** SUBPART 19.8 – CONTRACTING WITH THE SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION (THE 8(a) PROGRAM)
EXHIBIT 31.2
**Section 302 Certification of Principal Financial Officer**
I, Frederic T. Boyer, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Qualstar Corporation;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  (b)  [Paragraph (b) is omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]  (c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: February 11, 2005     /s/ FREDERIC T. BOYER    Frederic T. Boyer,
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2998 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2998

             To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,2-Bis(3-
 aminopropyl)ethylenediamine, polymer with N-butyl-2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-
          4-piperidinamine and 2,4,6-trichloro-1,3,5-triazine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 24, 2006

  Mr. DeMint introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,2-Bis(3-
 aminopropyl)ethylenediamine, polymer with N-butyl-2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-
          4-piperidinamine and 2,4,6-trichloro-1,3,5-triazine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1,2-BIS(3-AMINOPROPYL)ETHYLENEDIAMINE, POLYMER WITH N-BUTYL-
              2,2,6,6-TETRAMETHYL-4-PIPERIDINAMINE AND 2,4,6-TRICHLORO-
              1,3,5-TRIAZINE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.38.11        1,2-Bis(3-              Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           aminopropyl)ethylened                                             31/2009          ''
                           iamine, polymer with                                                                .
                           N-butyl-2,2,6,6-
                           tetramethyl-4-
                           piperidinamine and
                           2,4,6-trichloro-1,3,5-
                           triazine (CAS No.
                           136504-96-6)
                           (provided for in
                           subheading
                           3812.30.60)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2014111EN.01004401.xml

| 15.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 111/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 111/44

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 385/2014

of 3 April 2014

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Elbe-Saale Hopfen (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Germany's application to register the name ‘Elbe-Saale Hopfen’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Germany's application to register the name ‘Elbe-Saale Hopfen’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no objection under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Elbe-Saale Hopfen’ should be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no objection under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Elbe-Saale Hopfen’ should be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 April 2014.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 345, 26.11.2013, p. 24.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.8. other products listed in Annex I to the Treaty (spices, etc.)

GERMANY

Elbe-Saale Hopfen (PGI)

---
#### § 58.710 Fillers.

A strainer should be installed between the cooker and the filler. The hoppers of all filters shall be covered but the cover may have sight ports. If necessary, the hopper may have an agitator to prevent buildup on side wall. The filler valves and head shall be kept in good repair and capable of accurate measurements. Product contact surfaces shall be of stainless steel or other corrosion resistant material.