alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1315.606-2 Evaluation.       (a) If the contracting officer determines, upon initial review, that the unsolicited proposal meets all criteria in FAR 15.606-1, the contracting officer will acknowledge receipt of the proposal, coordinate evaluation with the program office, and provide to the submitter an estimated date that evaluation of the proposal is expected to be completed. The contracting officer shall transmit the proposal to the program office for evaluation, marking it in accord with FAR 15.609(d). If the estimated date for completion of the evaluation cannot be met, the submitter should be informed in a timely manner and provided with a revised evaluation completion date.          (b) The evaluating office shall not reproduce or disseminate the proposal to other offices without the consent of the contracting officer. If the evaluating office requires additional information from the proposer, the evaluator shall request the information through the contracting officer, who will contact the proposer. The evaluator shall not communicate directly with the proposer.          (c) Evaluators shall notify the contracting officer of their recommendations when the evaluation is complete. Following evaluation, the contracting officer shall proceed in accord with FAR 15.607.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1315.6 - Unsolicited Proposals
224.203 Policy.       (a)  DoD implementation is in DoDD 5400.7, DoD Freedom of Information Act Program, and DoD 5400.7-R, DoD Freedom of Information Act Program.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 224.2 - FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3187 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3187

To designate the Post Office located at 5755 Post Road, East Greenwich, 
        Rhode Island, as the ``Richard L. Cevoli Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

 Mr. Reed (for himself and Mr. Chafee) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the Post Office located at 5755 Post Road, East Greenwich, 
        Rhode Island, as the ``Richard L. Cevoli Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RICHARD L. CEVOLI POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The post office located at 5755 Post Road, East 
Greenwich, Rhode Island, shall be known and designated as the ``Richard 
L. Cevoli Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the post office referred 
to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Richard 
L. Cevoli Post Office.
                                 <all>
```
744.202-170 Partner vetting.       If an acquisition is identified as subject to partner vetting, see (48 CFR) AIDAR 704.70 for the applicable procedures and requirements.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 744.2—Consent to Subcontracts
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Matt J. Colbert, Chief Financial Officer of Gold Crest Mines, Inc. (the Registrant) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This annual report on Form

10-K/A-1

 of the Registrant for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



Date:  

April 29

, 2009



/s/        Matt J. Colbert_____

Matt J. Colbert

Chief Financial Officer
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

MAXIE McNABB, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv664-MHT

) 

SANDERS LEAD COMPANY, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

 RULE 26(F) ORDER

The parties are reminded of the obligation, imposed

by Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to

confer and to develop a proposed discovery plan.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Rule 26(f) report

containing the discovery plan shall be filed as soon as

practicable but not later than December 1, 2006.

The longstanding practice in this district is that

dispositive motions shall be filed no later than 90 days

prior to the pretrial date. If the parties seek to vary

from that schedule, they should present, in the plan,

Case 2:06-cv-00664-MHT-SRW Document 5 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 1 of 3
2

specific case-related reasons for the requested variance.

In their Rule 26(f) report, however, the parties should

assume that the 90-day requirement will apply.

This case will be set for trial before the

undersigned judge during one of that judge's regularly

scheduled civil trial terms, within 7 to 10 months of

this order if a term is available and, if not available,

then as soon as possible thereafter. The pretrial date

is normally set within four to six weeks of a scheduled

trial term. The dates of each judge's civil trial terms

are available on the court's website located at

<http://almd.uscourts.gov> in the civil case information

section.

The court may or may not hold a scheduling conference

before issuing a scheduling order. If the court holds a

scheduling conference, counsel may participate in the

scheduling conference by conference call.

The scheduling order entered by the court will follow

the form of the Uniform Scheduling Order adopted by the

Case 2:06-cv-00664-MHT-SRW Document 5 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 2 of 3
judges of this court. The Uniform Scheduling Order is

also available on the court's website.

The report of the parties should comply with Form 35

of the Appendix of Forms to the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

DONE, this the 17th day of November, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00664-MHT-SRW Document 5 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 3 of 3
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 23

- 0215

_________________ PATRICIA TAFELSKI, et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs and Appellees,

v. MARK JOHNSON, TAMMI FISHER,

Plaintiffs, Objectors , and Appellants, v. LOGAN HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER,

Defendant and Appellee. 

### N O TI C E AND O RD ER

_________________ The undersigned submits this notice to the parties in accordance with Rule 2.12(C) of the Montana Code of Judicial Conduct and Comment [5] of that Rule. This appeal raises a challenge to the award of attorneys ’ fees included in the Eighth Judicial District Court ’ s approval of a class action settlement agreement. Though not
s eparately challenged on appeal, the settlement agreement also provides that , in the event of money remaining from checks uncashed by members of the class , those remaining monies will be distributed to the non-profit Montana Justice Foundation

. In accordance with the agreement, the District Court ’ s order approve d the distribution of the remaining value from the s ettlement f

und to the Montana Justice Foundation pursuant to M. R. Civ. P. 23. I serve
as an ex officio , non- voting me mber o f the B o ard of Directors of the Montana Justice Foundation in accordanc e with the bylaws of that organization calling for one of the four ex officio , non- voting director seats to be filled by a Montana Supreme Court justice

. Given the nature of the specific issue on appeal, I do not believe that Rule 2.12(A) requires my disqualification in this case but, as recommended by Comment [5], I disclose 12/13/2023

Case Number: DA 23-02152

this information because the parties or their lawyers might reasonably consider it relevant to a possible motion for disqualification

. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the parties are given ten days from the date of this order to file with the Clerk of this Court any motion for disqualification of the undersigned on the basis of the above disclosure. In accordance with Rule 2.12(C), if the parties and their lawyers agree, without participation by the undersigned or by any other court personnel, that the undersigned should not be disqualified, they should notify the Clerk in writing of their agreement , and it shall be incorporated into the record of this appeal. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Notice and Order to counsel for all parties.

Electronically signed by: Beth Baker Justice, Montana Supreme Court December 13 2023
# 5133.090 Definition.

“Alternative dispute resolution (ADR)” means any procedure, in lieu of litigation, used to resolve issues in controversy, including but not limited to facilitation, conciliation, mediation, early neutral evaluation, non-binding arbitration, minitrial, fact-finding, ombudsman process, or any combination thereof.

**Parent topic:**Part 5133 - Protests, Disputes, and Appeals
52.232-9 Limitation on Withholding of Payments.       As prescribed in 32.111(b)(2), insert a clause substantially as follows, appropriately modified with respect to payment due dates in accordance with agency regulations, in solicitations and contracts when a supply contract, service contract, time-and-materials contract, labor-hour contract, or research and development contract is contemplated that includes two or more terms authorizing the temporary withholding of amounts otherwise payable to the contractor for supplies delivered or services performed:          Limitation on Withholding of Payments (Apr 1984)          If more than one clause or Schedule term of this contract authorizes the temporary withholding of amounts otherwise payable to the Contractor for supplies delivered or services performed, the total of the amounts withheld at any one time shall not exceed the greatest amount that may be withheld under any one clause or Schedule term at that time; *provided*, that this limitation shall not apply to-                                       (a) 						            Withholdings pursuant to any clause relating to wages or hours of employees;                                          (b) 						            Withholdings not specifically provided for by this contract;                                          (c) 						            The recovery of overpayments; and                                          (d) 						            Any other withholding for which the Contracting Officer determines that this limitation is inappropriate.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.232 [Reserved]
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 76522]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30891]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee 
will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public 
comment, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the 
Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, January 25, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Gilbert at 1-888-912-1227 or 
(515) 564-6638.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee 
will be held Tuesday, January 25, 2011, at 3 p.m. Eastern Time via 
telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or 
submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference 
lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Susan 
Gilbert. For more information please contact Ms. Gilbert at 1-888-912-
1227 or (515) 564-6638 or write: TAP Office, 210 Walnut Street, Stop 
5115, Des Moines, IA 50309 or contact us at the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: December 3, 2010.
Shawn F. Collins,
Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2010-30891 Filed 12-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA,

NORTffiRN DIVISION.

ANTHONY BERNARD MOORER, ii) 2

Plaintiff EBt P. HAc[TTCL

U.S. DSTRICT COURT

HDD F flS fRC 1 .ALA

v. No. 2:06-CV-672-WKW.

CITY OF MONTGOMERY, et al.,

Defendants.

NOTICE OF APPEAL TO THE UNITED STATES COURT

OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

The plaintiff appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit from

the order of the district court for the Middle District of Alabama], entered in this case on March

13, 2008.

Date 0/

ANTHONY B,RNARD MOORER, pro se

4241 Green Meadow Drive

MONTGOMERY, AL 36108

334-221-9415

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Anthony Bernard Moorer, do hereby Certify that a true and correct copy of the

foregoing has been furnished by U.S. Mail, electronic mail on this Io day of April 2008, to:

MICHAEL DAVID BOYLE

ALLISON HALE HIGHLEY

Attorneys for the Defendants

CITY OF MONTGOMERY

POST OFFICE BOX 1111

MONTGOMERY, AL 36101-1111

ANTHONY ERNARD MOORER

Case 2:06-cv-00672-WKW-WC Document 40 Filed 04/10/2008 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 31.1

I, Robert G. Watts, Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the Bank as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The Companys other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have;

a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Company is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b. evaluated
the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the Evaluation Date); and

c. presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The Companys other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);

a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Companys ability to
record, process, summarize, and report financial data, and I have identified for the Companys auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys
internal controls; and

6. The Companys other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses.



|                     |  |  |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: March 19, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Robert G. Watts, Jr.             
|                     |  |  |  | Robert G. Watts, Jr.                 
|                     |  |  |  | President and Chief Financial Officer
Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 7 Filed 09/15/2006 Page 1 of 1
Part 5246 - QUALITY ASSURANCE       Subpart 5246.7 - WARRANTIES                                                         5246.703 Criteria for use of warranties.                                                            5246.704 Authority for use of warranties.                                                            5246.706 Warranty terms and conditions.    Subpart 5246.7 - WARRANTIES     5246.703 Criteria for use of warranties.    Notwithstanding FAR 46.703 and in accordance with             10 U.S.C. 8688, contracts for new construction          shipbuilding, for which funds are expended from the Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy          account, shall require, as a condition of the contract, that the work performed under the          contract is covered by a warranty for a period of at least one year.       (S-90) Waiver. If the contracting officer for a contract covered by the requirement for a new shipbuilding contract warranty determines that a limited liability of warranted work is in the best interest of the Government, the contracting officer may agree to limit the liability of the work performed under the contract to a level that the contracting officer determines is sufficient to protect the interests of the Government and is in keeping with historical levels of warranted work on similar vessels.5246.704 Authority for use of warranties.    (S-90) Notwithstanding DFARS 246.704 (1) and (2)          and in accordance with 10 U.S.C. 8688, chief of          the contracting office approval is not required for the use of a warranty for new          construction shipbuilding for which funds are expended from the Shipbuilding and          Conversion, Navy account and the contract is effective on or after the date of enactment of          the National Defense Authorization for FY2018.5246.706 Warranty terms and conditions.    (b)(2) *Remedies*.       (iv) Acceptable turnaround time(s) for warranty corrective actions taken by the contractor should be specified, and consideration should be given to using liquidated damages or charging the contractor for product replacement costs when specified turnaround times are not met.       (5) *Markings*. Warranted items should be marked with the National Stock Number (NSN) or manufacturer's part number, a serial number or other item identifier (if the warranty applies to uniquely identified items), the contract number, an indication that a warranty applies, the manufacturer or entity (if other than the contractor) providing the warranty, the date or time the warranty expires, and an indication of whether or not attempted on-site repair by DON personnel will void the warranty.
Subpart 1336.2 - Special Aspects of

Contracting for Construction

Parent topic: PART 1336 - CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS

1336.203 Government estimate of construction costs.

After award, the independent Government estimated price can be released, upon request, to those

firms or individuals who submitted proposals.

1336.270 Special requirements for ship construction

See 48 CFR 1371 for special requirements for acquisition involving ship construction and ship

repair.
e 

Ttansportdtion Woshm^ton, DC 20590 

Off ice of the Secretary 

ofTransportafon 

Mr. John R. Mietus 

Law Office of John R. Mietus 

6701 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 300 

Bethesda, MD 20817-7500 

Re: Docket DOT-OST-2009-0267 and DOT-OST-2009-0268 

Applications of Atlas Air, Inc. for Section 41102 Certificate Authority 

Dear Mr. Mietus: 

We have reviewed the supplemental information filed on behalf of Atlas Air, Inc. ("Atlas"), in 

Docket DOT-OST-2009-0267 and DOT-OST-2009-0268 on January 21, 2010, for the 

determination of its fitness to engage in interstate and foreign charter passenger air 

transportation. 

This review has revealed the need for additional and/or clarifying information before we can 

continue processing Atlas' application. The attached Information Request lists the areas where 

further and/or clarifying information is needed in order for us to fully prosecute 

Atlas' application. I ask tfiat you please respond fully to this request within 10 days of the date 

of this letter. The original plus six copies of your response must be filed in Docket DOT-OST2009-0267 and DOT-OST-2009-0268. 

Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions regarding this letter or 

the requested information, please feel free to contact Scott Faulk of my staff at 202-366-9967. 

Sincerely, 

Lauralyn, 

Carrier Fitness Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

Enclosure 

cc: Docket DOT-OST-2009-0267 

Docket pot-OST-2009-0268 

Allen Taylor, FAA Principal Operations Inspector 
INFORMATION REQUEST 

Atlas Air, Inc. 

GENERAL INFORMATION 

4. Provide any and all agency agreement(s) between SonAir and USAEA. 

5. Does Atlas currently have a sufficient number of pilots employed by the air carrier to 

operate the Houston Express? If not, how does Atlas intend to meet its pilot staffing 

needs? 

6. Will Angola citizen cabin crew be used at any point in the operation of the Houston 

Express charter or any other air transportation operation provided by Atlas? 

COMPLIANCE DISPOSITION 

The information provided pursuant to this Information Request should be accompanied by the 

following certification: 

The contents of this application and the attached exhibit (s) are true and correct to the 

best of my knowledge and belief. Pursuant to Title 18 United States Code Section 

1001,1 [the individual signing the application, who shall be a principal owner, senior 

officer, or internal counsel of the applicant], in my individual capacity and as the 

authorized representative of the applicant, have not in any manner knowingly and 

willfully falsified, concealed or failed to disclose any material fact or made any false, 

fictitious, or fraudulent statement or knowingly used any documents which contain such 
statements in connection with the preparation, filing or prosecution of the application. 1 

understand that an individual who is found to have violated the provisions of 18 U.S.C 

section 1001 shall be fined or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.