alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Opinion issued November 9 , 2017

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 17
- 00312
- CR

——————————— RONALD WAYNE EARLS , Appella nt

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appell e e
On Appeal from the 232nd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 1466294

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Ronald Wayne Earls, pleaded guilty to the felony o ffense of aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon . The trial court found appellant guilty and, in accordance with the terms of appellant’s plea bargain agreement with the State,2

sentenced appellant to 10 years’ incarceration. Appellant filed a notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal. In a plea bargain ca se, a defendant may only appeal those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d). The trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal. See id . The trial court’s certification states that this is a plea bargain c ase and that the defendant has no right of appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(a)(2). The record supports the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Because appellant has no right of appeal, we must dismis s this appeal. See Chavez v. State , 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an appellant who plea

- bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must dismiss a prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for the appeal.”). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Bland, and Brown

. Do not publish. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47.2(b).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          27,675
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,281
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 5,030
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           137,695
<LOANS>                                        363,309
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,294
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 561,799
<DEPOSITS>                                     460,740
<SHORT-TERM>                                    11,330
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              6,257
<LONG-TERM>                                     26,898
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           519
<OTHER-SE>                                      56,055
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 561,799
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  8,184
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,004
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   199
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                10,387
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,952
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,373
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,014
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      732
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  40
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,349
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,530
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,046
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,046
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.94
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,796
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    73
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  8,985
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 4,291
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      928
<RECOVERIES>                                       199
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,294
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             4,294
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 762
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 762 appear at 72 FR 63297, Nov. 8, 2007.

§ 762.123 Insurance and farm inspection requirements. ( a ) *Insurance.* ( 1 ) Lenders must require borrowers to maintain adequate property, public liability, and crop insurance to protect the lender and Government's interests.
( 2 ) By loan closing, applicants must either: ( i ) Obtain at least the catastrophic risk protection (CAT) level of crop insurance coverage, if available, for each crop of economic significance, as defined by § 400.651 of this title, or
( ii ) Waive eligibility for emergency crop loss assistance in connection with the uninsured crop. EM loan assistance under part 764 of this chapter is not considered emergency crop loss assistance for purposes of this waiver and execution of the waiver does not render the borrower ineligible for EM loans.
( 3 ) Applicants must purchase flood insurance if buildings are or will be located in a special flood hazard area as defined by FEMA flood hazard area maps and if flood insurance is available.
( 4 ) Insurance, including crop insurance, must be obtained as required by the lender or the Agency based on the strengths and weaknesses of the loan.
( b ) *Farm inspections.* Before submitting an application the lender must make an inspection of the farm to assess the suitability of the farm and to determine any development that is needed to make it a suitable farm.
[64 FR 7378, Feb. 12, 1999, as amended at 70 FR 56107, Sept. 26, 2005; 72 FR 63297, Nov. 8, 2007; 86 FR 43391, Aug. 9, 2021]
# AIR QUALITY

DA TA

1

# AIR QUALITY DA TA • Areas and similar but not the same • Entire area is marginal except for one monitor • Edgewood monitor (92 ppb) is 10 ppb higher than all other area monitors

2 

## • No data for the Baltimore central city • No noticeable gradient of increase between the two areas • Combining areas ties both to the “worst case”

### Baltimore/W ashington Ozone Monitors

**92 76**  **77 80**  **78 76** 

3 **81 79**  **76 75**  **73**
**69 82** 

**76 80**  **77 79** 

**79**

# EMISSIONS PROFILES

4

# DC AREA

EMISSIONS PROFILE • DC area is motor vehicle oriented (56% in 2007) • Mobile emissions have and continue to be significantly reduced  - 35,314 NO between 2002 and 2007

5

X 

### between 2002 and 2007 

## • Point source sector continues to decline  201 1 power plant NO X 

### emissions: 8,636 tons 

## • Remaining sectors are hard to control beyond OTC and federal controls

### Wa shington Emissions Profile – 2007 NO X

6

### Baltimore Emissions Profile – 2008 NO X

7

# EMISSION CONTROLS

8

# EMISSION CONTROLS • The two areas controlled to similar levels • Statewide EGU emissions & reductions have been similar • VA EGU reductions will continue  Coal generation likely will cease in next few years

9 

###  Coal generation likely will cease in next few years (over 2700 megawatts) : • GenOn Potomac River (482 MW) • Dominion Yo rktown (355 MW) • Dominion Chesapeake (636 MW) • Dominion Bremo Bluf f (250 MW) • Dominion Alta Vista (63 mw) • Dominion Hopewell (63 MW) • Dominion Southampton (63 MW) • AEP Glyn Ly n (335 MW) • AEP Clinch River (470 MW)

### MD/V

A Power Plant Emissions Tr ends

50000 60000 70000 80000 90000

10 0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 VA MD

# EMISSION CONTROLS • Mobile emissions will be further reduced in the future by controls already on the books  67% by 2017  78% by 2025  80% by 2040

11 

## • Ti er III could given us up to 30% more • What’ s left – Retrofits and TCMs  Big money controls with minimal benefits  DC TCM analysis – 220 tons NO X 

### for $85 million (annually)

### Wa shington DC On - Road Mobile Emissions Tr ends

1280000 100000 120000 140000**T o** **n s** **P e** **r Y** **e a** **r** 

### Wa shington DC On - Road Mobile Emissions Tr ends

13 126953 91639 41709 27180 26590 220 220 0 20000 40000 60000

2002 2007 2017 2025 2040**T o** **n s** **P e** **r Y** **e a** **r** Addit ional TCMs

# PLANNING IMPLICA TIONS

14

# Planning Implications and Burdens • We reject MDE’ s “smooth” transition prediction  Current PM2.5 redesignation process is a perfect example of potential problems 

## • Process could easily be hopelessly

15 

## bogged down by any number of issues:  Control strategies & reduction targets  Mobile emissions budgets  Growth policies  Mission creep such as climate issues
1319.812 Contract administration.       Awards under the Partnership Agreement are subject to 15 U.S.C. 637(a)(21). These contracts shall contain the clause 1352.219-70, *Section 8(a) Direct Award (Deviation),* which requires the contractor to notify the SBA and the contracting officer when ownership of the firm is being transferred.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1319.8 - Contracting With the Small Business Administration (the 8(a) Program)
Jayce Hafner 

Domestic Policy Analyst 

The Episcopal Church 

Jhafner@episcopalchurch.org 

It was the end of the arctic summer when Charlie first showed me the cracks in the tundra. Charlie is a 

hunter in the Arctic Village of Alaska, a Gwich'in settlement so remote that it can only be reached by 

plane. I am a policy analyst for The Episcopal Church, and was visiting Charlie's village to reconnect with 

the Gwich'in community, a native people with whom The Episcopal Church has enjoyed a longstanding 

relationship. Like the rest of his village, Charlie depends on caribou meat to survive, and he offered to 

take me to his hunting ground: the pristine Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. 

Charlie showed me what the scientific community considers visible effects of climate change. From his 

hunting boat, he indicated a wide swath of collapsed riverbank, tumbled spruce trees tangled in a sink 

hole. Once on the tundra, he pointed to large, ominous cracks in the land, two inches wide and 

spreading across the plain. 

Charlie simply said: "The permafrost is melting." 

Next, he showed me forests of willows, a tree species unknown to grow in the Refuge before now. 

"The caribou's horns catch in the willow's branches", he said. "They can't get through, and are changing 

their migration path away from our hunting grounds." 

"If the caribou don't come through," I asked, "How will you eat this winter?" 

Charlie shrugged. He did not know. 

Climate change is one of the great moral issues of our time, and scientific evidence points to carbon 

pollution as a driving force behind it. According to researchers at Stanford University, if unchecked, 

carbon pollution could lead to 21,000 climate change related deaths. We already see these tragedies 

occurring around the world: displacing populations, sickening children, and rendering species and 

cultures nearly extinct. 

Inspired by the growing body of evidence demonstrating that a transition to a low-carbon society is both 

feasible and economical, and equipped with the knowledge that carbon plants contribute to 40% of 

carbon pollution causing climate change, The Episcopal Church supports carbon pollution protections for 

existing power plants. We thank you for your attention to this issue and urge swift action to finalize the 

Clean Power Plan Proposed Rule, emphasizing a shift to renewable energy rather than a transition to 

lower carbon fossil fuels. 

We ask this on behalf of our congregations on the coastlines who are still recovering from devastating 

hurricanes, for those on the plains and deserts who suffer from harsher summers and winters every 

year, and for all communities who bear the undue burden of climate change. Finally, we ask this on 

behalf of our brothers and sisters in the Arctic, so that come winter, Charlie and his village can survive.
CBIC Control Number 

355589 

RECEIVED 

OPPT CBIC 

2013 AUG \h AM 12: 18 

Via Federal Express 

OPPT Document Control Office (7407M) 

EPA East Building, Room 6428 

1201 Constitution Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20460 

Attn: Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2010-1039 

AUG 2 9 2013 

Andrea V. Malinowski 

Corporate Counsel 

DuPontLegal 

Wilmington Office Buildings 

1007 Market Street 

Wilmington, DE 19898 

302-774-6443 Tel 302-774-4812 Fax 

andrea.v.malinowski@usa.diipont.com E-mail 

August 13,2013 

Dear Sir/Madam: 

Attn: Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2010-1039 

Supplemental Comments 

Certain Polybrominated Diphenylethers; Significant New Use Rule and Test Rule 

77 FR19862 (April 2,2012) / 77 FR 30972 (May 24,2012) 

This letter is a supplement to the July 30, 2012 comments submitted on behalf of E. I. du Pont de 

Nemours and Company (the Company) pertaining to the above-identified rule. 

In the July 30, 2012 comments, in section numbered 6 thereof, the Company identified activities 

involving decabromodiphenyl ether (CAS No. 1163-19-5) that were targeted to cease as of December 31, 

2013 and as of June 30, 2014. The described activities, which include the activity described in section 

numbered 1 of the July 30th comments, have now ceased. 

Please contact the undersigned if additional information or further clarification is needed. 

Andrea V. Malinowski 

cc: Kirsten Hesla, EPA 

E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company 
Page 1 of 1 

From: (302)773-0071 

Doris Duffy 

E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. 

1007 Market Street 

D-7096-1 

Wilmington, DE 19898 

Origin ID: ZWIA FedJsx. 

Express 

J1320130623032 s 6 

SHIP TO: (202) 564-8930 BILL SENDER 

Docket ID #EPA-HQ-OPPT-2010-1039 

US EPA East Bldg., Room 6428 

1201 Constitution Avenue, NW 

OPPT Document Control Off (7407IW) 

WASHINGTON, DC 20460 

Ship Date: 13AUG13 

ActWgt:1.0 LB 

CAD: 4554543/INET3430 

Delivery Address Bar Code 

Ref# 

Invoice # 

PO# 

Dept# 

TM<# 7964 4990 7257 

EP RDVA 

WED-14 AUG 10:30A 

PRIORITY OVERNIGHT 

20460 

DC-US 

DCA 

51AG1«9B9/1*9E
mcrb-ex1019_440.htm



Exhibit 10.19

 

 

SECOND AMENDMENT

TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

This Second Amendment (the “Second Amendment”) to that certain Employment Agreement between Seres Therapeutics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (together with any successor thereto, the “Company”), and Michele Trucksis, Ph.D., M.D. (the “Executive”) dated as of June 13, 2015, as amended (the “Employment Agreement”) is made as of March 7, 2018 (the “Amendment Date”), by and between the Company and the Executive.

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the terms of the Employment Agreement as set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Company and the Executive hereby agree to the following:

1.Amendment to the Employment Agreement.  Effective as of the Amendment Date, the Employment Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

(a)The second sentence of Section 2(b) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:

“Executive’s annual incentive compensation under such incentive program (the “Annual Bonus”) shall be targeted at 40% of Executive’s Annual Base Salary.”

2.References.  The references to “this Agreement” in the Employment Agreement shall mean the Employment Agreement, as amended by this First Amendment.

3.No Other Amendment.  Except as expressly set forth in this First Amendment, the Employment Agreement shall remain unchanged and shall continue in full force and effect according to its terms.

4.Counterparts.  This First Amendment may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall constitute one document.

5.Governing Law.  This First Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (without giving effect to any choice or conflict of laws provision or rule that would cause the application of the laws of any other jurisdiction).

6.Headings.  The headings in this First Amendment are for reference purposes only and will not in any way affect the meaning or interpretation of this First Amendment.  

7.Entire Agreement.  This First Amendment constitutes the entire agreement among the parties concerning the subject matter hereof and supersedes any prior representations, understandings or agreements.




 





 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Second Amendment as of the Amendment Date.

 


	
SERES THERAPEUTICS, INC.

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
By:
	
 
	
/S/ Roger J. Pomerantz, M.D.

	
Name:
	
 
	
Roger J. Pomerantz, M.D.

	
Title:
	
 
	
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board




 


	
EXECUTIVE

	
 

	
/S/ Michele Trucksis, Ph.D., M.D.

	
Michele Trucksis, Ph.D., M.D.




 

2
EXHIBIT 32.2





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Isdera North America, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Songtao Liu,, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated: April 15, 2011

/s/ Songtao LiuSongtao Liu

Chief Financial Officer

(principal financial officer)
Case 2:06-cv-00633-MEF-VPM Document 5-3 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 238 (Monday, December 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 77645]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31143]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System 
(PRAMS), DP11-001 Panel D, Initial Review

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting:

    Time and Date: 11 a.m.-3 p.m., February 25, 2011 (Closed).
    Place: Teleconference.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters to be Discussed: The meeting will include the initial 
review, discussion, and evaluation of ``Pregnancy Risk Assessment 
Monitoring System (PRAMS), DP11-001 Panel D.''
    Contact Person for More Information: Donald Blackman, Ph.D., 
Scientific Review Officer, CDC, National Center for Chronic Disease 
Prevention and Health Promotion, Office of the Director, Extramural 
Research Program Office, 4770 Buford Highway, NE., Mailstop K-92, 
Atlanta, GA 30341, Telephone: (770) 488-3023, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a4e0e6fd93e4c7c0c78ac3cbd2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4703051e700724232469202831">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: December 2, 2010.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2010-31143 Filed 12-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 923.30 Powers. The committee shall have the following powers: ( a ) To administer the provisions of this part in accordance with its terms;
( b ) To receive, investigate, and report to the Secretary complaints of violations of the provisions of this part;
( c ) To make and adopt rules and regulations to effectuate the terms and provisions of this part; and
( d ) To recommend to the Secretary amendments to this part.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3221 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3221

          To suspend temporarily the duty on Ecoflex F BX7011.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on Ecoflex F BX7011.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON EXOFLEX F BX7011.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.39.06        1,4-                    Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           Benzenedicarboxylic                                               31/2009          ''
                           acid, dimethyl ester,                                                               .
                           polymer with 1,4-
                           butanediol and
                           hexanedioic acid (CAS
                           No. 55231-08-8)
                           (provided for in
                           subheading
                           3907.99.00)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 984.12 Substandard walnuts.

*Substandard walnuts* means all walnuts (whether inshell or shelled) that do not meet the minimum standard prescribed for merchantable walnuts whenever regulations are in effect pursuant to § 984.50.

[88 FR 56748, Aug. 21, 2023]