alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3053 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3053

   To suspend temporarily the duty on synthetic elastic staple fiber.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

  Mr. Carper introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on synthetic elastic staple fiber.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SYNTHETIC ELASTIC STAPLE FIBER.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.55.03        Synthetic elastic       Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           staple fiber of                                                   31/2009          ''
                           polyethylene                                                                        .
                           terephthalate and
                           polytrimethylene
                           terephthalate,
                           patented bi-component
                           melt-spun elasterell-
                           p (provided for in
                           subheading
                           5503.20.00)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# 36.507 Permits and responsibilities.

The *contracting officer**shall* insert the clause at 52.236-7, Permits and Responsibilities, in *solicitations* and contracts when a fixed-price or cost-reimbursement *construction* contract or a fixed-price dismantling, demolition, or removal of improvements contract is contemplated.

**Parent topic:**Subpart 36.5 - Contract Clauses
# 5214.407-3 Other mistakes disclosed before award.

(e) HCAs, without power of redelegation, may make the determinations required by FAR 14.407-3(a), (b) and (d).

**Parent topic:**5214.407 Mistakes in bids.
Exhibit 32.2

                             CIRALIGHT GLOBAL, INC.
                              A Nevada corporation
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Ciralight  Global,   Inc.
("Company")  on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jarrett
Fenton,  Chief Financial Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906, or
other  document  authentication,   acknowledging,   or  otherwise  adopting  the
signature  that  appears in typed from  within  the  electronic  version of this
written statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and  furnished  to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


Date: August 14, 2012               /s/ Jarrett Fenton
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Jarrett Fenton
                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                    (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
#### § 966.110 Order.

*Order* means Order No. 966 (§§ 966.1 through 966.92) regulating the handling of tomatoes grown in Florida, also referenced in this part as *marketing order and agreement.*

[84 FR 59292, Dec. 5, 2019]
#### Art Shiffer, Appellant-Respondent, v Bristol Myers Company et al., Respondents-Respondents, and Carole C. Wilson, Appellant. Bristol Myers Company et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents; Robert P. Wilson et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on December 28,1979, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The defendants-respondents cross-respondents’ renewed motion is granted and the cross appeal of defendant Carole Wilson and third-party defendants Carole Wilson and Robert Wilson from the denial of leave to plaintiff to amend the complaint as against Bristol Myers and Clairol is dismissed, without costs, on the ground that they are not parties aggrieved. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Bims, Fein, Sandler and Sullivan, JJ.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

EASTERN DIVISION

GEORGE D. McCARLEY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) 3:06-CV-00663-MHT

)

CITY OF ROANOKE, a Municipal Corporation, et al., ) wo

)

Defendants. )

ORDER ON MOTION

Pursuant to the Order filed on July 27, 2006 referring this case for action on all pretrial

matters and for recommendation as may be appropriate (Doc. 3), the undersigned Magistrate Judge

considers the Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed In forma Pauperis (Doc.2, filed July 25, 2006). The

court wishes the Plaintiff to understand fully the limited nature of being allowed to proceed in forma

pauperis. This status does permit the Plaintiff to commence thislawsuit without prepayment of fees

and court costs, but it does not permit the Plaintiff to maintain the lawsuit without incurring any

personal expenses.

The Plaintiff should understand that he may incur expenses as a result of the prosecution of

this case, and there is no provision for the court's payment of those expenses. For example, in the

event of a trial, the Plaintiff may compel the attendance of witnesses through subpoena only by

tendering to each witness payment of a one-day witness fee of $40, plus mileage. Additionally, court

costs, in varying amounts, can be very substantial, and they are normally assessed against the losing

party. This means that a plaintiff who loses a case may be charged with, and obligated to pay, all

court costs, even though the plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis. 

Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 4 Filed 07/31/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

Having advised the Plaintiff of the possible expense of litigation, it is ORDERED that the

Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2) is GRANTED.

For good cause, it is further ORDERED that service of the Complaint shall not proceed

pending the entry of appropriate orders following the hearing scheduled by order filed

herewith.

Done this 31 day of July, 2006. st

/s/ Delores R. Boyd

DELORES R. BOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 4 Filed 07/31/2006 Page 2 of 2
---

---

Exhibit 13.2

# CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OFTITLE 18, UNITED STATES
CODE)

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of RRsat Global
Communications Network Ltd., a company organized under the laws of the State of Israel
(the Company), does hereby certify that, to his knowledge:

| | 1. | the
Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the                Form
20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of                Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | the
information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date: March 23, 2009 |  | By: /s/ Gil Efron
Gil Efron Chief Financial Officer
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

September 11, 2006

NOTICE OF MDL TRANSFER

Loretta G. Whyte

Clerk of Court

United States District Court

Eastern District of Louisiana

500 Poydras St., Room C-151

New Orleans, LA 70130

Re: In re: MDL 1657 Vioxx Products Liability Litigation

USDC/MD of AL Civil Action No. 1:06cv637-MHT

Ruth Williams vs. Merck & Co., Inc.

Dear Clerk:

The referenced case is being transferred to your court pursuant

to the Conditional Transfer Order entered by the Judicial Panel

on Multi-District Litigation on 08/10/2006 and filed with your

court on 8/29/2006. As requested in your e-mail, the case is

being transferred electronically. The following documents are

being sent in PDF format to the email address provided in your

request: complaint, amended complaint, the docket sheet, and the

MDL Transfer Order.

ALL FUTURE PLEADINGS SHOULD BE FILED IN THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF

LOUISIANA.

Case 1:06-cv-00637-MHT-SRW Document 12 Filed 09/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cv-00637-MHT-SRW Document 12-2 Filed 09/08/2006 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-00637-MHT-SRW Document 12-2 Filed 09/08/2006 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-00637-MHT-SRW Document 12-2 Filed 09/08/2006 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-00637-MHT-SRW Document 12-2 Filed 09/08/2006 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-00637-MHT-SRW Document 12-2 Filed 09/08/2006 Page 5 of 5
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 5:95CR5032LAC

RAYMOND DANIELS

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on January 14, 2008 

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION UNDER 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) FOR REDUCTION OF

SENTENCE BASED ON RETRO ACTIVE GUIDELINE AMENDMENT, EFFECTIVE

NOVEMBER 1, 2007, CONCERNING COCAINE BASE (“CRACK”) 

Filed by DEFENDANT PRO SE on 12/27/2007 Doc.# 141

RESPONSES:

BY GOVERNMENT on 1/14/2008 Doc.# 142

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Mary Maloy

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 16th day of

January, 2008, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) Without prejudice. The retroactive application does not become effective

until 3 March 2008. 

 s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 5:95-cr-05032-LC-MD Document 143 Filed 01/16/08 Page 1 of 1
# Subpart 1308.8 - Acquisition of Printing and Related Supplies

**Parent topic:**PART 1308 - REQUIRED SOURCES OF SUPPLIES AND SERVICES

## 1308.802 Policy.

The designee authorized as the Department's central printing authority is set forth in CAM 1301.70.   

## 1308.802-70 Printing.

Insert clause 1352.208-70, *Restrictions on Printing and Duplicating,* in all solicitations and contracts when printing documents may be required in the performance of the contract.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 7, 2011

s0131 

# Order

February 7, 2011

141963

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141963 COA: 291048 Wayne CC: 08-004988-FC WANZELL ABDULLAH, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 16, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       1,014,198
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,343,423
<ALLOWANCES>                                    57,766
<INVENTORY>                                     53,242
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,509,730
<PP&E>                                       5,679,680
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,074,839
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,521,444
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,472,060
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         61
<COMMON>                                       105,283
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,645,502
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,521,444
<SALES>                                      2,911,661
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,911,661
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,391,291
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,440
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                503,034
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            503,034
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   545,186
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 35 (Tuesday, February 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 8106]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3137]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Reclamation


Change in Discount Rate for Water Resources Planning

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of change.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Water Resources Planning Act of 1965 and the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1974 require an annual determination of a 
discount rate for Federal water resources planning. The discount rate 
for Federal water resources planning for fiscal year 2010 is 4.375 
percent. Discounting is to be used to convert future monetary values to 
present values.

DATES: This discount rate is to be used for the period October 1, 2009 
through and including September 30, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brooke Miller-Levy, Water and 
Environmental Resources Office, Denver, Colorado 80225; telephone: 303-
445-2889.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the interest 
rate to be used by Federal agencies in the formulation and evaluation 
of plans for water and related land resources is 4.375 percent for 
fiscal year 2010.
    This rate has been computed in accordance with Section 80(a), 
Public Law 93-251 (88 Stat. 34) and 18 CFR 704.39, which: (1) Specify 
that the rate will be based upon the average yield during the preceding 
fiscal year on interest-bearing marketable securities of the United 
States which, at the time the computation is made, have terms of 15 
years or more remaining to maturity (average yield is rounded to 
nearest one-eighth percent); and (2) provide that the rate will not be 
raised or lowered more than one-quarter of 1 percent for any year. The 
Treasury Department calculated the specified average to be 3.9910 
percent. This average value is then rounded to the nearest one-eighth 
of a point, resulting in 4.0 percent. This exceeds the permissible one-
quarter of 1 percent change from fiscal year 2009 to 2010. Therefore, 
the change is limited to a one-quarter percent decrease.
    The rate of 4.375 percent will be used by all Federal agencies in 
the formulation and evaluation of water and related land resources 
plans for the purpose of discounting future benefits and computing 
costs or otherwise converting benefits and costs to a common-time 
basis.

    Dated: February 9, 2010.
Roseann Gonzales,
Director, Policy and Administration, Denver Office.
[FR Doc. 2010-3137 Filed 2-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MN-P
Subpart 412.3 - Solicitation Provisions and

Contract Clauses for the Acquisition of

Commercial Items

Parent topic: PART 412 - ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL ITEMS

412.302 Tailoring of provisions and clauses for the

acquisition of commercial items.

The head of the contracting activity is authorized to approve waivers in accordance with FAR

12.302(c). The approved waiver may be either for an individual contract or for a class of contracts

for the specific item. The approved waiver and supporting documentation shall be incorporated into

the contract file.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

ELIZABETH LYNNE HUTCHINSON, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO:

vs. ) CV-06-00700-WHA

) JURY DEMAND

)

PHENIX CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION,)

)

Defendant.

MOTION TO WITHDRAW

COMES NOW, Benjamin J. De Gweck, one of the attorneys of record for

the Plaintiffs in the above styled action and moves to withdraw as counsel of

record. As grounds for this Motion, counsel states the following:

1. As of March 9, 2007 Benjamin J. De Gweck will no longer be associated

with the firm Wiggins, Childs, Quinn & Pantazis. Rocco Calamusa, Jr., who is

already counsel of record in the case, will continue to represent the plaintiff in the

above styled case.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Benjamin J. De Gweck prays

that this Court will grant his Motion to Withdraw as counsel for the plaintiffs in

this case.

Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 20 Filed 03/02/2007 Page 1 of 3
2

Respectfully Submitted,

/s/Benjamin J. DeGweck

Benjamin J. DeGweck

Rocco Calamusa, Jr.

Counsel for Plaintiffs

Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 20 Filed 03/02/2007 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on March 2, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send

notification of such filing to the following:

Sydney S. Smith, Esq.

Smith & Smith

1503 Broad street

Phenix City, Alabama 36867

This the 2nd day of March, 2007.

/s/Benjamin J. DeGweck

OF COUNSEL

Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 20 Filed 03/02/2007 Page 3 of 3
First Department,

May, 1969

(May 1, 1969)

#### In the Matter of the People of the State of New York by Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Long Island Home, Ltd., Doing Business as South Oaks Hospital, Appellant.

Order, entered January 29, 1969, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Although, under the circumstances, the order represents a proper exercise of Special Term’s discretion as a *pendente lite*direction in this proceeding brought pursuant to subdivision 12 of section 63 of the Executive Law, we note that the respondent is entitled to a hearing, with the opportunity to present evidence on the issues raised in the proceeding, including on the question of the alleged unconseionability of the particular clauses in the subject contract. (Cf. Uniform Commercial Code, § 2-302; 1 Anderson’s Uniform Commercial Code, § 2-302:5.) In fact, the order of Special Term provides for an early trial of the issues, and certainly, the findings and conclusions of Special Term made on the return day of the proceeding, without an evidentiary hearing, should not be accepted as binding upon the trial court. The parties should proceed diligently toward an early trial, and if the petitioner should unreasonably delay the prosecution of the proceeding, the respondent may move at Special Term for modification of the provisions of the order restraining use of initial payments made by patients. Concur—■ Stevens, P. J., Eager, Tilzer, MeGivem and McNally, JJ.
§ 51.2561 Average moisture content. ( a ) Determining average moisture content of the lot is not a requirement of the grades, except when kernels are specified as “very well dried.” It may be carried out upon request in connection with grade analysis or as a separate determination.
( b ) Kernels shall be obtained from a randomly drawn composite sample. Official certification shall be based on the air-oven method or other officially approved methods or devices. Results obtained by methods or devices not officially approved may be reported and shall include a description of the method or device and owner of any equipment used.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          -  [Docket Nos. EG10-65-000; EG10-66-000; EG10-67-000; EG10-68-000; EG10-69-000; EG10-70-000; EG10-71-000]

Take notice that during the month of November 2010, the status of the above-captioned entities as Exempt Wholesale Generators became effective by operation of the Commission's regulations. 18 CFR 366.7(a) (2010).

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-30752 Filed 12-7-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P