alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3262 

To suspend temporarily the duty on aluminum lamp-holder housings 

containing sockets. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 26, 2006 

Mr. FRIST (for Mrs. DOLE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on aluminum lamp-holder 

housings containing sockets. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN ALUMINUM LAMP-HOLDER HOUSINGS 

4 CONTAINING SOCKETS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.85.33 Aluminum lamp-holder housings containing sockets (provided for in subheading 8536.61.00) ................................ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 3262 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6688

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

SREEDHAR POTARAZU,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (1:16-cr-00261-AJT-1; 1:18-cv-00914-

AJT)

Submitted: September 24, 2019 Decided: September 27, 2019

Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sreedhar Potarazu, Appellant Pro Se. Elissa Hart-Mahan, UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Aidan Taft Grano, Assistant United 

States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Sreedhar Potarazu seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate 

of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, 

a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that 

the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. 

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion 

states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Potarazu has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Potarazu’s motion for a certificate of 

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 925.25 Qualification and acceptance.

Any person selected as a member or alternate member of the Committee shall, prior to such selection, qualify by filing a qualifications questionnaire advising the Secretary that he or she agrees to serve in the position for which nominated.

[81 FR 44761, July 11, 2016]
§ 905.13 District. ( a ) *Citrus District One* shall include the Counties of Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco, Hernando, Citrus, Sumter, and Lake.
( b ) *Citrus District Two* shall include the Counties of Osceola, Orange, Seminole, Alachua, Putnam, St. Johns, Flagler, Marion, Levy, Duval, Nassau, Baker, Union, Bradford, Columbia, Clay, Gilchrist, and Suwannee, and County Commissioner, Districts One, Two, and Three of Volusia County, and that part of the Counties of Indian River and Brevard not included in Regulation Area II.
( c ) *Citrus District Three* shall include the County of St. Lucie and that part of the Counties of Brevard, Indian River, Martin, and Palm Beach described as lying within Regulation Area II, and County Commissioner's Districts Four and Five of Volusia County.
( d ) *Citrus District Four* shall include the Counties of Manatee, Sarasota, Hardee, Highlands, Okeechobee, Glades, De Sota, Charlotte, Lee, Hendry, Collier, Monroe, Dade, Broward, and that part of the Counties of Palm Beach and Martin not included in Regulation Area II.
( e ) *Citrus District Five* shall include the County of Polk.
[42 FR 59368, Nov. 17, 1977]
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3354 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Basic Blue 7. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 5, 2006 

Mr. KENNEDY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Basic Blue 7. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BASIC BLUE 7. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.31.20 Basic Blue 7 (CAS No. 2390–60–5) 

(provided for in subheading 3204.13.80) Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 3354 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
Case 2:06-cv-00674-WKW-TFM Document 11 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00674-WKW-TFM Document 11 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00674-WKW-TFM Document 11 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00674-WKW-TFM Document 11 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 4 of 4
Editorial Note on Part 94
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 94 appear at 61 FR 51352, Oct. 2 1996.

§ 94.302 Analyses available and locations of laboratories. ( a ) The Science and Technology Division laboratories will analyze processed poultry products for moisture, fat, salt, protein, nitrites, and added citric acid.
( b ) Deboned poultry for roasting will have the individual dark meat, light meat, and skin portions tumbled separately in the natural juices prior to grinding. The skin, light meat, and dark meat portion weight percentages of the total product are determined. The ground skin, ground dark meat, and ground light meat portions will be analyzed separately for moisture, protein, salt, and fat. Moisture to protein ratios will be reported also for the individual portions of poultry.
( c ) Canned boned poultry for a variety of USDA programs will be tested as a total can composite of the canned product for moisture, fat, salt, and protein analyses. Additional poultry commodities and related products for specific USDA sponsored programs will be tested for different chemical and physical attributes.
( d ) Microbiological analyses, as the *Salmonella* determination, are available for poultry products.
( e ) The majority of analyses for processed poultry products shall be performed at the Science and technology Division Eastern Laboratory, as indicated in paragraph (e) of § 94.3.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 239 (Tuesday, December 14, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 77871]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31303]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE U.S.

[Public Notice 2010-0059]


Agency Information Collection Activities: Final Collection; 
Comment Request

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the U.S.

ACTION: Submission for OMB review and comments request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Form Title: Application for Express Insurance.
SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank), as a 
part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent 
burden, invites the general public and other Federal Agencies to 
comment on the proposed information collection, as required by the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
    The Application for Express Insurance will be used to determine the 
eligibility of the applicant and the creditworthiness of one of the 
applicant's foreign buyers for Export-Import Bank assistance under its 
insurance program. Export-Import Bank customers will be able to submit 
this form on paper.
    This is a new application form for use by small U.S. businesses 
with limited export experience. Companies that are eligible to use the 
Express policy will need to answer approximately 20 questions and sign 
an acknowledgement of the certifications that appear on the reverse of 
the application form. This program does not provide discretionary 
credit authority to the U.S. exporter, and therefore the financial and 
credit information needs are minimized. This new form incorporates the 
recently updated standard Certification and Notices section as well as 
two questions about the amount of U.S. employment to be supported by 
this policy.
    Based upon comments received we have changed the name of this form 
from Application for Short-Term Express Export Credit Insurance Policy 
to Application for Express Insurance.
    The form can be viewed at http://www.exim.gov/pub/pending/EIB10_02.pdf.

DATES: Comments should be received on or before January 13, 2011 to be 
assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Comments maybe submitted electronically on http://www.regulations.gov or by mail to Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20038 attn: OMB 3048-
xxxx.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Titles and Form Number: EIB 10-02 
Application for Express Insurance.
    OMB Number: 3048-xxxx.
    Type of Review: New.
    Need and Use: The Application for Express Insurance will be used to 
determine the eligibility of the applicant and the transaction for 
Export-Import Bank assistance under its insurance program.
    Annual Number of Respondents: 500.
    Estimated Time per Respondent: 15 minutes.
    Government Annual Burden Hours: 1,000 hours.
    Frequency of Reporting or Use: Once per year.

Sharon A. Whitt,
Agency Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-31303 Filed 12-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3207 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3207

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,1,2-2-Tetrafluoroethene, oxidized, 
                              polymerized.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

Mr. Lautenberg introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,1,2-2-Tetrafluoroethene, oxidized, 
                              polymerized.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1,1,2-2-TETRAFLUOROETHENE, OXIDIZED, POLYMERIZED.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.39.16        1,1,2-2-                Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           Tetrafluoroethene,                                                31/2009          ''
                           oxidized, polymerized                                                               .
                           (CAS No. 69991-61-3)
                           (provided for in
                           subheading 3907.20)..

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 900.211 Penalties.

Any official who shall have violated the provisions of § 900.210 by willfully divulging, disclosing, or making public any information acquired by or furnished to or in the possession or custody of such official pursuant to the provisions of a marketing agreement or marketing order shall be subject to a penalty of the amount specified at § 3.91(b)(1) (viii) of this title for each offense. (The civil penalty provided in this section is prescribed under the authority contained in sec. 10(c) of the Act (7 U.S.C. 610(c)); this provision is not intended to supersede the provision in section 8d(2) of the Act (7 U.S.C. 608d(2)) for criminal liability and removal from office.)

[25 FR 5907, June 28, 1960, as amended at 75 FR 17560, Apr. 7, 2010; 88 FR 82231, Nov. 24, 2023]
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 233 (Monday, December 6, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 75707]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30667]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Board of Governors; Sunshine Act Meeting

Date and Time: Tuesday, December 7, 2010, at 9 a.m.

Place: Washington, DC, at U.S. Postal Service Headquarters, 475 
L'Enfant Plaza, SW.

Status: Closed.

Matters To Be Considered: Tuesday, December 7, at 9 a.m. (Closed)
    1. Financial Matters.
    2. Pricing.
    3. Strategic Issues.
    4. Personnel Matters and Compensation Issues.
    5. Governors' Executive Session--Discussion of prior agenda items 
and Board Governance.

Contact Person for More Information: Julie S. Moore, Secretary of the 
Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 
20260-1000. Telephone (202) 268-4800.

Julie S. Moore,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-30667 Filed 12-2-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3316 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 6 V lead-acid storage batteries. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 26, 2006 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mrs. CLINTON) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 6 V lead-acid storage 

batteries. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 6 V LEAD-ACID STORAGE BATTERIES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.85.07 6 V lead-acid storage batteries, of a kind 

used for the auxiliary source of power for 

burglar or fire alarms and similar apparatus of subheading 8531.10.00 (provided for in subheading 8507.20.80) ....... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•S 3316 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 16, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-60426

Summary Calendar

 

MARIA DEL ROSARIO MOLINA,

Petitioner,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

--------------------

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A77 788 231

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Maria Del Rosario Molina petitions this court for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming the

Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) order denying Molina’s application for

cancellation of removal pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1), as

well as her request for voluntary departure. Molina argues that:

(1) the federal crime for which she was previously convicted did

not involve moral turpitude; (2) her federal crime was not an

aggravated felony offense; (3) the IJ erred by admitting
No. 02-60426

-2-

uncertified evidence that her application for temporary resident

status had been denied; and (4) the IJ erred by not allowing

testimony regarding hardship to family members resulting from her

removal. Because Molina does not warrant any relief, we

pretermit any jurisdictional issues under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252(a)(2)(C). See United States v. Alvarez, 210 F.3d 309, 310

(5th Cir. 2000).

This court reviews only the decision of the BIA and not that

of the Immigration Judge, except to the extent that the decision

of the Immigration Judge influenced the BIA’s decision. See

Carbajal-Gonzales v. INS, 78 F.3d 194, 197 (5th Cir. 1996). This

court conducts a de novo review of the BIA’s legal rulings but

“will defer to the BIA’s interpretation of immigration

regulations if the interpretation is reasonable.” Lopez-Gomez v.

Ashcroft, 263 F.3d 442, 444 (5th Cir. 2001). Fact findings are

reviewed for substantial evidence. See id.

The BIA’s denial of Molina’s application for cancellation of

removal pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a) was not erroneous because

Molina failed to submit any evidence showing that she was a

permanent resident alien. See 8 C.F.R. § 240.11(e)(2001)(alien

bears burden of proof to show eligibility for cancellation of

removal). Molina does not challenge the BIA’s determination that

she abandoned her application for cancellation of removal

pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b). She has therefore not shown

that the BIA erred in denying relief under that subsection.

Accordingly, Molina’s petition for review is DENIED.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

NICHOLAS STRICKLAND, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) 1:06-CV-00682-TFM

)

CHAMPION ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., )

 )

Defendants. )

ORDER

Pending before the Court is (1) the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant

Champion Enterprises, Inc. (Doc. 5, filed August 4, 2006), the responses, and subsequent

supplements; and (2) the Motion to Strike Jury Demand as to Alter-Ego Claims and To Stay

Alter Ego Claims (Doc. 10, filed September 7, 2006) and the responses. It is for good cause

ORDERED that the parties appear for a HEARING on the above referenced motions

on June 11, 2007 at 9:00 a.m. The hearing shall be heard in District Courtroom 4A, Frank

M. Johnson, Jr. United States Courthouse Complex, One Church Street, Montgomery,

Alabama. The hearing shall be attended by at least one of the attorneys representing each

of the parties. The parties shall make oral arguments on both motions as well as be prepared

to address the Court’s questions. 

Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 44 Filed 05/10/2007 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

DONE this 10th day of May, 2007.

/s/Terry F. Moorer 

 TERRY F. MOORER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 44 Filed 05/10/2007 Page 2 of 2
###### Editorial Note on [Subchapter A of Chapter VIII](/current/title-7/chapter-VIII/subchapter-A)

#### Authority:

[7 U.S.C. 71-87K](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/7/71), [1621-1627](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/7/1621).

###### Editorial Note on [Subchapter A of Chapter VIII](/current/title-7/chapter-VIII/subchapter-A)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at [84 FR 45645](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/84-FR-45645), Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 810.206 Grades and grade requirements for barley.

| Grade | Minimum limits of— | | Maximum Limits of— | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Test weight per bushel (pounds) | Sound barley (percent) | Damaged kernels1 (percent) | Heat damaged kernels (percent) | Foreign material (percent) | Broken kernels (percent) | Thin barley (percent) |
| U.S. No. 1 | 47.0 | 97.0 | 2.0 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 10.0 |
| U.S. No. 2 | 45.0 | 94.0 | 4.0 | 0.3 | 2.0 | 8.0 | 15.0 |
| U.S. No. 3 | 43.0 | 90.0 | 6.0 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 12.0 | 25.0 |
| U.S. No. 4 | 40.0 | 85.0 | 8.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 18.0 | 35.0 |
| U.S. No. 5 | 36.0 | 75.0 | 10.0 | 3.0 | 5.0 | 28.0 | 75.0 |
| | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| U.S. Sample Grade: | | | | | | | |
| U.S. Sample grade shall be barley that: | | | | | | | |
| (a) Does not meet the requirements for the grades 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5; or | | | | | | | |
| (b) Contains 8 or more stones or any number of stones which have an aggregate weight in excess of 0.2 percent of the sample weight, 2 or more pieces of glass, 3 or more crotalaria seeds (*Crotalaria* spp.), 2 or more caster beans (*Ricinus communis* L.), 4 or more particles of unknown foreign substance(s) or commonly recognized harmful or toxic substance(s), 8 or more cocklebur (*Xanthium* spp.) or similar seeds singly or in combination, 10 or more rodent pellets, bird droppings, or equivalent quantity of other animal filth per 11/8 to 11/4 quarts of barley; or | | | | | | | |
| (c) Has a musty, sour, or commercially objectionable foreign odor (except smut or garlic odor); or | | | | | | | |
| (d) Is heating or otherwise of distinctly low quality. | | | | | | | |
| 1 Includes heat-damaged kernels. Injured-by-frost kernels and injured-by-mold kernels are not considered damaged kernels. | | | | | | | |

[[61 FR 18492](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/61-FR-18492), Apr. 26, 1996]
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

RALPH WILSON LINGO, )

)

 Petitioner, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06-CV-703-MHT

)

WILLIE R. COLLINS, et al., )

)

 Respondents. )

ORDER ON MOTION

Upon review of the file in this case, and as the petitioner has been allowed an

opportunity to file an amendment to his petition, it is

ORDERED that the petitioner shall file no response to the answer of the respondents

until further order of this court. It is further

ORDERED that the motion for extension of time to file reply filed by the petitioner

on October 3, 2006 (Court Doc. No. 14) be and is hereby DENIED as moot. 

Done this 6th day of October, 2006.

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00703-MHT-CSC Document 15 Filed 10/06/2006 Page 1 of 1