alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Daniel Halpert, Appellant, v Alice Sachs et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents, and Allen Hodge, Respondent. In the Matter of Allen Hodge, Respondent, v Frank X. Gargiulo et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents, and Daniel Halpert, Appellant.

Judgments, Supreme Court, Bronx County, each entered on April 1, 1980, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. No opinion. Concur— Ross, J. P., Markewich, Lupiano, Bloom and Carro, JJ.
# 52.204 [Reserved]

- 52.204-1 Approval of Contract. 
- 52.204-2 Security Requirements. 
- 52.204-3 Taxpayer Identification. 
- 52.204-4 Printed or Copied Double-Sided on Postconsumer Fiber Content Paper. 
- 52.204-5 Women-Owned Business (Other Than Small Business). 
- 52.204-6 Unique Entity Identifier. 
- 52.204-7 System for Award Management. 
- 52.204-8 Annual Representations and Certifications. 
- 52.204-9 Personal Identity Verification of Contractor Personnel. 
- 52.204-10 Reporting Executive Compensation and First-Tier Subcontract Awards. 
- 52.204-11 [Reserved] 
- 52.204-12 Unique Entity Identifier Maintenance. 
- 52.204-13 System for Award Management Maintenance. 
- 52.204-14 Service Contract Reporting Requirements. 
- 52.204-15 Service Contract Reporting Requirements for Indefinite-Delivery Contracts. 
- 52.204-16 Commercial and Government Entity Code Reporting. 
- 52.204-17 Ownership or Control of Offeror. 
- 52.204-18 Commercial and Government Entity Code Maintenance. 
- 52.204-19 Incorporation by Reference of Representations and Certifications. 
- 52.204-20 Predecessor of Offeror. 
- 52.204-21 Basic Safeguarding of Covered Contractor Information Systems. 
- 52.204-22 Alternative Line Item Proposal. 
- 52.204-23 Prohibition on Contracting for Hardware, Software, and Services Developed or Provided by Kaspersky Lab Covered Entities. 
- 52.204-24 Representation Regarding Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment. 
- 52.204-25 Prohibition on Contracting for Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment. 
- 52.204-26 Covered Telecommunications Equipment or Services-Representation. 
- 52.204-27 Prohibition on a ByteDance Covered Application. 
- 52.204-28 Federal Acquisition Supply Chain Security Act Orders—Federal Supply Schedules, Governmentwide Acquisition Contracts, and Multi-Agency Contracts. 
- 52.204-29 Federal Acquisition Supply Chain Security Act Orders—Representation and Disclosures. 
- 52.204-30 Federal Acquisition Supply Chain Security Act Orders—Prohibition. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 52.2 - Text of Provisions and Clauses
Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 87 Filed 02/28/2007 Page 1 of 1
§ 958.28 Nominations. Nominations from which the Secretary may select the members of the Idaho-Eastern Oregon Onion Committee and their respective alternates may be made in the following manner: ( a ) The committee shall hold or cause to be held prior to April 1 of each year, after the effective date of this subpart, one or more meetings of producers and of handlers in each of the districts, or portions of the production area, in which the then current terms of office will expire the following May 31;
( b ) In arranging for such meetings the committee may, if it deems desirable, cooperate with existing organizations and agencies and may combine its meetings with others;
( c ) Nominations for committee members and alternate members shall be supplied to the Secretary, in such manner and form as he may prescribe, not later than 30 days prior to the end of each fiscal period;
( d ) Only producers may participate in designating nominees for producer committee members and their alternates and only handlers may participate in designating nominees for handler committee members and their alternates;
( e ) Each person who is both a handler and a producer may vote either as a handler or as a producer and may select the group in which he will vote;
( f ) Regardless of the number of districts in which a person produces or handles onions, each such person is entitled to cast only one vote on behalf of himself, his partners, agents, subsidiaries, affiliates and representatives, in designating nominees for committee members and alternates. In the event a person is a producer engaged in producing onions in more than one district, such person shall select the district within which he may participate as aforesaid in designating nominees. Similarly, a person who is a handler both in Malheur County, Oregon, and in the Idaho portion of the production area, may select either Malheur County or the Idaho portion of the production area in which to cast his vote for the applicable committee handler member and alternate. Each such handler shall also be entitled to cast his vote for the committee member and alternate to represent the production area-at-large. An eligible voter's privilege of casting only one vote, as aforesaid, shall be construed to permit such voter to cast one vote for each member and alternate position to be filled in the respective district or portion of the production area, as the case may be, in which he elects to vote; and
( g ) The producer and handler members of the committee shall nominate the public member and alternate. The committee shall prescribe such additional qualifications, administrative rules and procedures for selection and voting for each candidate as it deems necessary and as the Secretary approves.
[22 FR 26, Jan. 3, 1957. Redesignated at 26 FR 12751, Dec. 30, 1961, as amended at 47 FR 8000, Feb. 24, 1982]
§ 932.16 Handle. *Handle* means to: ( a ) Size-grade olives,
( b ) process olives, or
( c ) use processed olives in the production of packaged olives, within the production area, or
( d ) ship packaged olives from the area to any point outside thereof or within the area: *Provided,* This term shall not include natural condition olives acquired and ( 1 ) used for olive oil, salt cured oil coated olives (also variously referred to as “Greek Olives,” “Greek Style Olives,” or “Oil Cured Olives”), or Silician Style Olives, or
( 2 ) shipped to fresh market outlets.
[36 FR 20356, Oct. 21, 1971]
# L_2014128EN.01006201.xml

| 30.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 128/62 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 128/62

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 436/2014

of 23 April 2014

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Piranska sol (PDO)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Slovenia's application to register the name ‘Piranska sol’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Slovenia's application to register the name ‘Piranska sol’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Piranska sol’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Piranska sol’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 April 2014.

For the Commission

On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 353, 3.12.2013, p. 15.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.8 other products of Annex I to the Treaty (spices, etc.)

SLOVENIA

Piranska sol (PDO)

---
#### § 932.70 Effect of termination or amendment.

Unless otherwise expressly provided by the Secretary, the termination of this subpart or any regulation issued pursuant thereto, or the issuance of any amendment to either thereof, shall not (a) affect or waive any right, duty, obligation, or liability which shall have arisen, or which may thereafter arise, in connection with any provision of this subpart, or any regulation issued thereunder; (b) release or extinguish any violation of this subpart or of any regulation issued thereunder; or (c) affect or impair any rights or remedies of the Secretary or any other person with respect to any such violation.
#### § 930.71 Records.

Each handler shall maintain such records of all cherries acquired, handled, stored or sold, or otherwise disposed of as will substantiate the required reports and as may be prescribed by the Board. All such records shall be maintained for not less than two years after the termination of the fiscal year in which the transactions occurred or for such lesser period as the Board may direct with the approval of the Secretary.
CERTIFICATIONI, Lawrence E. Kreider, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc. (the“Company”), pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify asfollows:1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2009 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and2. The information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.IN WITNESSWHEREOF, I have executed this Certification this 6th day of November, 2009.        /s/ LAWRENCE E. KREIDER, JR.   Lawrence E. Kreider, Jr., Chief Financial Officer
DuPont Confidential Business Information October 30, 2009 Appendix D Facility Report on Product Content

Fluorotelomers

Attachment Confidential Business Information
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 135564(31) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 135564 

 COA: 277913 

Jackson CC: 99-097252-FH 

WILLIAM T. CARLESS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s June 23, 2008 

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously. 

d0915 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 22, 2008 

 Clerk
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

WILLIE MCNAIR, )

)

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2:06-cv-695-WKW

)

RICHARD ALLEN, et al., )

)

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. )

____________________________________

)

JAMES CALLAHAN, )

)

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2:06-cv-919-WKW

)

RICHARD ALLEN, et al., )

)

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the telephone status conference set for October 31, 2007, is

CONTINUED to November 15, 2007, at 1:30 p.m (CST). The defendants are responsible for

arranging the phone status conference. 

Done this 30thday of October, 2007.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 132 Filed 10/30/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### § 959.3 Person.

*Person* means an individual, partnership, corporation, association or any other business unit.
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 (the Report) of The Peoples BancTrust Company, Inc. (the Company), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the undersigned, Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby each certify that to the best of our knowledge:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for the
periods covered in the Report.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    ELAM P. HOLLEY,
JR.                                                
|Elam P. Holley, Jr.President and Chief Executive Officer                  
|                                                                          
|/s/    ANDREW C. BEARDEN,
JR.                                             
|Andrew C. Bearden, Jr.Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer



May 14, 2003

(Date)



|A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The information furnished herein shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall
it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
§ 905.162 Repacking certificate of privilege. ( a ) *Application.* Application for a repacking certificate of privilege by a repacking shipper shall be made on an Application for a Repacking Certificate of Privilege form supplied by the committee. Each such application shall contain, but need not be limited to, the name, address and Florida citrus fruit dealer license number of the applicant; approximate number of boxes to be handled during the season; the various types of containers to be used to ship the repacked citrus fruit; a certification to the Secretary of Agriculture and to the committee as to the truthfulness of the information shown thereon; and any other appropriate information or documents deemed necessary by the committee or duly authorized agents for the purposes stated in § 905.161.
( b ) *Approval.* The committee or its duly authorized agents shall give prompt consideration to each application for a repacking certificate of privilege. Approval of an application based upon a determination as to whether the information contained therein and other information available to the committee supports approval, shall be evidenced by the issuance of a repacking certificate of privilege to the applicant. Each such certificate shall expire at the end of the fiscal period.
( c ) *Suspension or denial of certificate of privilege.* The committee may investigate the handling of repacked fresh citrus fruit shipments under certificates of privilege to determine whether repacking shippers are complying with the requirements and regulations applicable to such certificates. Whenever the committee finds that a repacking shipper is failing to comply with the requirements and regulations applicable to such certificates, the certificate of privilege issued to such repacking shipper may be suspended or, in the case of an application for the issuance of an initial certificate of privilege, may be denied. Such suspension of a certificate shall be for a reasonable period of time as determined by the committee, but in no event shall it extend beyond the end of the then current fiscal period. In the case of the denial of an application for the issuance of an initial certificate, such certificate shall be denied until the applicant comes into compliance with the requirements and regulations applicable to such certificates. Prior to suspending or denying an application for a certificate of privilege, the committee shall give the shipper or applicant an opportunity, either orally or in writing, to present opposing facts and reasons. The shipper or applicant shall be informed of the committee's determination in writing and in a timely manner.
[59 FR 48783, Sept. 23, 1994]
#### § 774.23 Loan servicing.

Loans will be serviced as a Non-program loan in accordance with 7 CFR part 766. If the loan is not repaid as agreed and default occurs, servicing will proceed in accordance with 7 CFR part 766, subpart H.

[72 FR 64121, Nov. 15, 2007]
# L_2014074EN.01003101.xml

| 14.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 74/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 74/31

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 244/2014

of 7 March 2014

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Strachitunt (PDO)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Strachitunt’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Strachitunt’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Strachitunt’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Strachitunt’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 March 2014.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12 2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 290, 5.10.2013, p. 5.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.3.   Cheeses

ITALY

Strachitunt (PDO)

---
1327.404-5 Unauthorized, omitted, or incorrect markings.       The designee authorized to concur with the contracting officer's determination that markings are not authorized is set forth in CAM 1301.70.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1327.4 - Rights in Data and Copyrights
#  Federal Acquisition Regulation

- Part 19 - Small Business Programs 
- Part 20 - Reserved 
- Part 21 - Reserved 
- Part 22 - Application of Labor Laws to Government Acquisitions 
- Part 23 - Environment, Energy and Water Efficiency, Renewable Energy Technologies, Occupational Safety, and Drug-Free Workplace 
- Part 24 - Protection of Privacy and Freedom of Information 
- Part 25 - Foreign Acquisition 
- Part 26 - Other Socioeconomic Programs 

**Parent topic:**Subchapter D - Socioeconomic Programs
TELEPHONE LOG

Name of Caller: John Sunda, SAIC

Date: October 27, 2011

Company Name: Sontek/YSI

Street Address: 9940 Summers Ridge Road

City/State/ZIP: San Diego, CA 92121

Person Contacted: Joel Edelman

Title: Applications Engineer

Contact Info: 1-858-546-8327 Ext 135

Called to inquire about use and cost of acoustic measuring devices for flow velocity

measurement at industrial cooling water intakes.

He said that the costs of an Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter will vary depending on 

instrumentation features such as real-time versus recording but would generally costs 

between $9,000 to $11,000 or more for each unit. I asked about equipment lifetime and 

he said that there are no moving parts and it would mostly be dependent on the 

environment but that at a minimum it should last more than10 years.

I asked about mounting set ups and he said it depended on the requirements could be as 

simple as a set up of one or more units that could fixed or moved around or a 

sophisticated system where the probe can automatically move across the face of the 

screen.
§ 900.7 Motions and requests. ( a ) *General.* All motions and requests shall be filed with the hearing clerk, except that those made during the course of the hearing may be filed with the judge or may be stated orally and made a part of the transcript. Except as provided in § 900.15(b) such motions and requests shall be addressed to, and ruled on by, the presiding officer if made prior to his certification of the transcript pursuant to § 900.10 or by the Secretary if made thereafter.
( b ) *Certification to Secretary.* The judge may in his discretion submit or certify to the Secretary for decision any motion, request, objection, or other question addressed to the judge.
#### § 906.1 Secretary.

*Secretary* means the Secretary of Agriculture of the United States, or any employee of the Department to whom authority has heretofore been delegated, or to whom authority may hereafter be delegated, to act in his stead.