alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(D)/15D-14(D)
                  UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Anthony N. Renzi, certify that:
1. I have  reviewed  this  report  on Form  10-K and all  reports  on Form  10-D
   required to be filed in respect of the period  covered by this report on Form
   10-K of RALI Series 2006-QS15 Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");
2. Based on my knowledge,  the Exchange Act periodic reports,  taken as a whole,
   do not contain  any untrue  statement  of a material  fact or omit to state a
   material  fact  necessary  to make  the  statements  made,  in  light  of the
   circumstances  under which such  statements  were made, not  misleading  with
   respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based  on  my  knowledge,  all  of  the  distribution,  servicing  and  other
   information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
   this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities  performed by the servicers and
   based on my knowledge and the compliance  reviews  conducted in preparing the
   servicer  compliance  statements  required in this report  under Item 1123 of
   Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic  reports,
   the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements
   in all material respects; and
5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance  with  servicing  criteria for
   asset-backed  securities and their related  attestation reports on assessment
   of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to
   be included in this report in accordance  with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
   Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
   report,  except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
   of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report
   on Form 10-K.

In giving the  certifications  above,  I have  reasonably  relied on information
provided to me by the following  unaffiliated parties:  SunTrust Mortgage,  Inc.
and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.

Date:  March 26, 2007

By:  /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
     ---------------------
    Name: Anthony N. Renzi
    Title: Managing Director
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division 

                    Notice is hereby given that, on January 11, 2010, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), the Joint Venture under TIP Award No. 70NANB10H018 (“JV TIP H018”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties to the venture and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                 

Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties to the venture are: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY and Geocomp Corporation, Boxborough, MA. The general area of JV TIP H018's planned activity is the development of a new health assessment framework, ranging from a satellite-based radar system to local sensor arrays to monitor and ensure the safety of levees and other distributed systems of a flood-control infrastructure. 

Patricia A. Brink, 

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2010-3089 Filed 2-19-10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of

the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders

and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions

of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 4/16/96

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TOBY LAURA POLASKY,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 95-4175

(D. Ct. No. 95-CV-64)

(D. Utah)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before TACHA, BALDOCK, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has

determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the

determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

This appeal is from an order of the district court dismissing pro se appellant’s

claims brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 on the grounds that none of the claims are

jurisdictional and all relate to allegations of misconduct by the United States. Appellant
- 2 -

argues on appeal that the district court erred in refusing to grant a hearing on her motion

brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, where she had argued that newly discovered

evidence warranted review by the district court and authorized such a hearing. We

affirm.

Appellant entered a nolo contendere plea in the United States District Court. The

plea entered by appellant followed a series of motions during which appellant sought to

show outrageous government conduct and a failure on the part of government officials to

preserve exculpatory evidence. Despite appellant’s recharacterization of the evidence

regarding the government’s actions at this point, appellant has waived the right to appeal

those issues or to raise them on a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Appellant’s nolo contendere

plea in this case waives all nonjurisdictional defects. Tollett v. Henderson, 411 U.S. 258

(1973). None of the allegations made in the district court nor those raised on appeal are

jurisdictional. We therefore AFFIRM the order of the district court dismissing this

action.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Deanell Reece Tacha

Circuit Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
52.247-21 Contractor Liability for Personal Injury and/or Property Damage.       As prescribed in 47.207-7(c), insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts for transportation or for transportation-related services:          Contractor Liability for Personal Injury and/or Property Damage (Apr 1984)                                       (a) 						            The Contractor assumes responsibility for all damage or injury to persons or property occasioned through the use, maintenance, and operation of the Contractor’s vehicles or other equipment by, or the action of, the Contractor or the Contractor’s employees and agents.                                          (b) 						            The Contractor, at the Contractor’s expense, shall maintain adequate public liability and property damage insurance during the continuance of this contract, insuring the Contractor against all claims for injury or damage.                                          (c) 						            The Contractor shall maintain Workers’ Compensation and other legally required insurance with respect to the Contractor’s own employees and agents.                                          (d) 						            The Government shall in no event be liable or responsible for damage or injury to any person or property occasioned through the use, maintenance, or operation of any vehicle or other equipment by, or the action of, the Contractor or the Contractor’s employees and agents in performing under this contract, and the Government shall be indemnified and saved harmless against claims for damage or injury in such cases.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.247 [Reserved]
Exhibit 31.1

 

**Certifications******

 

I, Tommy Harris, as senior officer in charge of the master servicing function of CitiMortgage, Inc., certify that:

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A and all reports on Form 10-D required |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K/A of Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust, Inc., 2006-AR7 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.            Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by the report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

| 4. | I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicers compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their  obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5.            All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset- backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K/A. 

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP, Fifth Third Bank, HomeBanc Mortgage Corporation, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

 

Date: June 5, 2008

 

By: /s/ Tommy Harris

Name:  Tommy Harris

Title: Senior Vice President – Master Servicing
ex_105974.htm


Exhibit 10.2.2


 


AMENDMENT NO.2


TO THE


CATHAY BANK


EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN


 


 


Cathay General Bancorp (the "Company") hereby amends the above-named plan (the "Plan"), effective as of January 1, 2017, as follows:


 


1.     Subsection (iv) of Section 6.2(a) of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:


 


"(iv) Despite any other provision of the Plan, the benefits in the Participant's Stock Account that consist of Stock in an S Corporation shall be distributed in the form of cash. Any benefits in the Participant's Stock Account that do not consist of Stock in an S Corporation shall also be distributed in the form of cash, unless such Participant elects to receive his or her benefits in the form of Stock."


 


* * * * * * * *


 


The Company has caused this Amendment No. 2 to be signed on the date indicated below, to be effective as indicated above.


 


	
			 

				
			"Company"

				
			 

			
	 	 	 
	Dated: August 18, 2017	CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP	 
	
			 

				
			 

				
			 

				
			 

			
	
			 

				
			 

				
			 

				
			 

			
	
			 

				
			By

				/s/ Pin Tai    	
			 

			
	
			 

				
			 

				
			 

				
			 

			
	
			 

				
			Its

				
			CEO and President
|  |
|--|

|  |
|--|
|  |

## Glaciological Data Series

### Report GD-29: Bibliography on the Hydrology of the Himalaya-Karakoram Region

| Report GD-29WDC SystemDescriptionForewordPrefaceContents | by Gordon J. Young and Bhanu Neupane
**Published by:**World Data Center-A for Glaciology [Snow and Ice]Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental SciencesUniversity of ColoradoBoulder, Colorado  80309-0449 USA

**WDC operated for:**U.S. Department of CommerceNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationNational Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information ServiceBoulder, Colorado 80303 USA

**NOTE:** Information current only as of print publication date: May 1996 |
|----------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.


# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

D&S CONSULTANTS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee,

and

CACI-ISS, INC., Defendant,

and

HP ENTERPRISE SERVICES, LLC., Defendant.

____________________

2012-5031

______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in Case No. 11-CV-446, Judge George W. Miller.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________A NTHONY H. A NIKEEFF , Williams Mullen, PC, of McLean, Virginia, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

C HRISTOPHER L. K RAFCHEK , Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were

S TUART F. D ELERY , Acting Assistant Attorney General,

J EANNE E. D AVIDSON , Director, and K IRK T. M ANHARDT

, Assistant Director. Of co unsel on the brief was V INCENT
B UONOCORE , Deputy Assistant General Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, of Eatontown, New Jersey.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (P ROST

, M AYER , and M OORE

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

October 9, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Date Jan Horbaly
Clerk
#### § 61.32 No discrimination in sampling.

Each licensed sampler, when requested, shall without discrimination, as soon as practicable and upon reasonable terms, sample any cottonseed if the same be made available to him at his place of business, under conditions that will permit proper sampling. Each such licensee shall give preference to those who request his services as such over persons who request his services in any other capacity.
#### § 923.3 Person.

*Person* means an individual, partnership, corporation, association, or any other business unit.
EX-35 (j)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

March 12, 2007

GS Mortgage Securities Corporation
85 Broad Street
New York, NY 10004

RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for GSAA Home Equity Trust 2006-16

Per Section 13.04 of the Master Servicing and Trust Agreement, dated as of
9/1/2006, the undersigned Officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Master Servicer),
hereby certifies the following for the 2006 calendar year or portion thereof:

(i)     A review of such party's activities during the preceding calendar year
        or portion thereof and of such party's performance under this Agreement,
        or such other applicable agreement in the case of an Additional
        Servicer, has been made under such officer's supervision.

(ii)    To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such
        party has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement, or such
        other applicable agreement in the case of an Additional Servicer, in
        all material respects throughout such year or portion thereof, or, if
        there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material
        respect, specifying each such failure known to such officer and the
        nature and status thereof.

(iii)   Notwithstanding anything herein to contrary (and noting that, to the
        extent of any inconsistency, any and all other statements,
        certifications or assertions herein are subject to the following):
        instances of noncompliance related to the subject transaction for the
        applicable reporting period are identified on Schedule A hereto.

Certified By:
/s/ Kristen Ann Cronin
Kristen Ann Cronin, Vice President

Certified By:
/s/ Gordon Johnson
Gordon Johnson, Assistant Secretary

(page)



Schedule A

Payment/Distribution Calculation Errors

During the reporting period, certain errors were made in connection with the
calculation of payments/distributions on the securities. To the best of the
signing officer's knowledge, each such error, which may or may not have been
material, has been identified and remedied and any related corrective action
has been disclosed in a report previously filed with the SEC in respect of the
reporting period.
234.7101 Solicitation provision and contract

clause.

(a) Use the basic or the alternate of the provision at 252.234-7003, Notice of Cost and Software Data

Reporting System, in any solicitation that includes the basic or the alternate of the clause at

252.234-7004 , Cost and Software Data Reporting.

(1) Use the basic provision when the solicitation includes the clause at 252.234-7004 , Cost and

Software Data Reporting—Basic.

(2) Use the alternate I provision when the solicitation includes the clause at 252.234-7004 , Cost and

Software Data Reporting—Alternate I.

(b) Use the basic or the alternate of the clause at 252.234-7004 , Cost and Software Data Reporting

System, in solicitations that include major defense acquisition programs as follows:

(1) Use the basic clause in solicitations and contracts for major defense acquisition programs that

exceed $50 million.

(2) Use the alternate I clause in solicitations and contracts for major defense acquisition programs

with a value equal to or greater than $20 million, but less than or equal to $50 million, when so

directed by the program manager with the approval of the OSD Deputy Director, Cost Assessment.

Parent topic: Subpart 234.71 - COST AND SOFTWARE DATA REPORTING
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7514

WILLARD LEE MARTIN, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THEODIS BECK, Secretary of the North Carolina

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. Wallace Wade Dixon,

Magistrate Judge. (CA-02-189-1)

Submitted: December 19, 2002 Decided: January 6, 2003

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

J. Phillip Griffin, NORTH CAROLINA PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES, INC.,

Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate

judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).

2

PER CURIAM:

Willard Lee Martin seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s

order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(2000).*

 We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons

stated by the magistrate judge that Martin has not made a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See

Martin v. Beck, No. CA-02-189-1 (M.D.N.C., filed Aug. 30, 2002;

entered Sept. 3, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)

(2000). We deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Case 1:03-cv-00734-MEF-SRW Document 10 Filed 10/08/2003 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:03-cv-00734-MEF-SRW Document 10 Filed 10/08/2003 Page 2 of 2
436.670 Firms ineligible for award - construction.       The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 452.236-80, Firms Ineligible For Award - Construction, in the contract for architect-engineering services except as provided in FAR 36.209 and AGAR 436.209.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 436.6 - Architect-Engineer Service
208.002 Priorities for use of mandatory

Government supply sources.

(a)(1) Supplies.

(i) See the guidance at PGI 208.002(a)(1)(i) to obtain information on available items in DoD’s

property inventories.

(v) See subpart 208.70, Coordinated Acquisition, and subpart 208.74, Enterprise Software

Agreements.

Parent topic: Part 208 - REQUIRED SOURCES OF SUPPLIES AND SERVICES