alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2952 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain other footwear valued over $20 

a pair with coated or laminated textile fabrics. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 23, 2006 

Mr. CARPER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain other footwear 

valued over $20 a pair with coated or laminated textile 

fabrics. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN OTHER FOOTWEAR VALUED OVER $20 

4 A PAIR WITH COATED OR LAMINATED TEX5 TILE FABRICS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 2952 IS 

‘‘ 9902.64.08 Footwear, other than men’s 

or women’s, valued over $20/ 

pair designed to be worn 

over, or in lieu of, other 

footwear as a protection 

against water, oil, grease or 

chemicals or cold or inclement weather where such protection includes protection 

against water that is imparted by the use of a coated or laminated textile fabric 

(except footwear with waterproof injection molded bottoms, i.e. comprising a complete outer sole and all or 

part of the upper) (provided 

in subheading 6402.99.20) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 1 of 23
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 2 of 23
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 3 of 23
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 4 of 23
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 5 of 23
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 6 of 23
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 7 of 23
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 8 of 23
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 9 of 23
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 10 of 23
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 11 of 23
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 12 of 23
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 13 of 23
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 14 of 23
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 15 of 23
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 16 of 23
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 17 of 23
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 18 of 23
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 19 of 23
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 20 of 23
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 21 of 23
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 22 of 23
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 23 of 23
#### Dorota Linette, Appellant, v Hanover Insurance Company, Respondent.

[814 NYS2d 608]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered August 19, 2005, denying plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and granting defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff sought a declaratory judgment in relation to a New Jersey insurance policy providing automobile coverage during her residency in New Jersey. She claims that under New Jersey law, defendant was collaterally estopped from relitigating issues already decided in an underlying personal injury action, where defendant had notice of both the litigation and the trial date, but chose not to intervene.

Collateral estoppel is essentially a procedural concept, and matters of procedure are governed by the law of the chosen forum *(see Martin v Dierck Equip. Co.,*43 NY2d 583, 588 [1978]). Although the New Jersey courts would apply collateral estoppel to preclude defendant from relitigating plaintiffs damages at arbitration *(see Zirger v General Acc. Ins. Co.,*144 NJ 327, 337-339, 676 A2d 1065, 1071 [1996]), the law and policy of New York precludes the application of this doctrine under the circumstances *(see Buechel v Bain,*97 NY2d 295 [2001], *cert denied*535 US 1096 [2002]). Hanover was not a party to the underlying action, and was not in privity with the party defendant there. While Hanover was on notice of the action, it did not intervene. Although New York has a permissive intervention statute, as does New Jersey, our courts recognize the potential prejudice to insurers forced to participate in personal injury matters *(see Paramount Ins. Co. v Rosedale Gardens,*293 AD2d 235 [2002]). Thus, Hanover did not have a full and fair opportunity to be heard on the issues therein *(see e.g. Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Casanova,*145 AD2d 630 [1988]). Accordingly, plaintiff is not entitled to a declaration, under New York law, *339that defendant is bound by the judgment in the underlying personal injury action. This decision is specifically limited to the enforceability of the underlying judgment against Hanover in New York. Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Marlow, Nardelli and Malone, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2931 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2931

  To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Magenta 3B-OA Stage.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 23, 2006

  Mr. Carper introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Magenta 3B-OA Stage.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MAGENTA 3B-OA STAGE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.04.28 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Magenta 3B-OA Stage) is 
amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 900.107 Meetings.

All meetings held pursuant to §§ 900.103 to 900.109 shall be held with and under the direction of the mediator.
EX-35 (b)
(logo) imb
IndymacBank


REG AB 1123 Statement of Compliance


I am an authorized officer for IndyMac Bank, F.S.B, the servicer for the
transactions listed on the attached schedule and I certify:

a) A review of IndyMac Bank's activities during the reporting period and of its
performance under the applicable servicing agreement has been made under my
supervision.

b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, except as set forth below
IndyMac Bank has fulfilled all of its obligations under the agreement in all
material respects throughout the reporting period.

c) None


By: /s/ Robert M. Abramian
Robert M. Abramian
First Vice President
Home Loan Servicing
Investor Reporting
Indymac Bank


By: /s/ Bart Vincent
Bart Vincent
First Vice President
HLS-Finance
Financial
Indymac Bank


Prepared for: Wells Fargo Bank

Date: February 28, 2007

Ref: EXHIBIT A


www.indymacbank.com

7700 W. Parmer Lane, Bldg D, Austin, TX 78729
Tel: 512.250.2700


(page)


EXHIBIT A

849 GSR 2006-1F 1/30/06
902 BSALTA 2006-1 1/30/06
840 DBALT 2006-AR1 1/31/06
918 BAYVIEW 2006-A 02/08/06
213 GSR 2006-2F
214 GSR 2006-3F 03-30-06
159 GSR 2006-0A1 8/24/06
229 MASTR 2006-1 03-29-06
223 DBALT 2006-AF1 03-31-06
231 HARBORVIEW 2006-2
233 LUMINENT 2006-3 (4-28-06)
287 LUMINENT 2006-5 (6-29-06)
454 LUMINENT CONDUIT 12MAT WLS 11/27/06
5001 LUMINENT 12MAT CONDUIT WLS 12/27/06
235 BAFC 2006-D 04/28/06
219 GSR 2006-5F 5/26/06
809 GSR 2006-6F (GS) 6/30/06
808 HARBORVIEW 2006-6 6/30/06
807 DBALTA 2006-AR 2 6/30/06
921 BSALTA 2006-4 6/30/06
285 MALT 2006-3 (6-30-06)
141 BSALTA 2006-5 7/28/06
278 GSAMP 2006-S4 (6-9-06)
199 HARBORVIEW 2006-8 (GW) 8/30/06
430 LUMINENT 2006-6 092806
432 MLMI 2006-F1 (ML) 09/29/06
379 CSMC 2006-8 09/29/06
378 BAFC 2006-H 9/29/06
178 MARM 2006-0A2 11/15/06
296 GSAA 2006-17 10/30/06
297 DBALT 2006-AR5 10/30/06
442 CSMC 2006-9 10/30/2006
440 ITF CSAB 2006-3 10/31/2006
456 JPALT 2006-S4 11/29/06
457 BCAP 2006-AA2 11/30/2006
458 ACE 2006-SD3 11/30/06
4101 DBALT 2006-AR6 12/15/06
4102 HARBORVIEW 2006-14 12/22/06
4103 MSM 2006-17XS 12/28/06
4104 GSR 2006-10F 12/29/06
4110 LUMINENT 2006-7 12/14/2006
4105 JPMMT 2006-S4 12/21/06
4106 GSAA 2006-20 12/29/06
4111 BSALTA 2006-8 12/28/06
Editorial Note on Part 869
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 869 appear at 84 FR 45646, Aug. 30, 2019.

§ 869.9 Dispute resolution and arbitration of private parties. ( a ) A person may initiate legal action in any court of competent jurisdiction concerning a claim for noncompliance or an unresolved dispute with respect to activities authorized under the Act.
( b ) Any claim for noncompliance or an unresolved dispute between a warehouse operator or provider and another party with respect to activities authorized under the Act may be resolved by the parties through mutually agreed-upon arbitration procedures or as may be prescribed in the applicable licensing or provider agreement. No arbitration determination or award will affect AMS's authority under the Act.
( c ) In no case will USDA provide assistance or representation to parties involved in an arbitration proceeding arising with respect to activities authorized under the Act.
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 30, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 74001]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30053]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. chapter 35).
    Agency: National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
    Title: Manufacturing Extension Partnership Expanded Services Client 
Impact Survey.
    OMB Control Number: None.
    Form Number(s): None.
    Type of Request: Regular submission (new information collection).
    Burden Hours: 375.
    Number of Respondents: 1,500.
    Average Hours per Response: 15 Minutes.
    Needs and Uses: The objective of the NIST Hollings Manufacturing 
Extension Partnership Program (HMEP) is to enhance productivity, 
technological performance, and strengthen the global competitiveness of 
small- and medium- sized U.S.-based manufacturing firms. Through this 
client impact survey, the MEP will collect data necessary for program 
accountability; analysis and research into the effectiveness of the MEP 
program; reports to stakeholders; Government Performance and Results 
Act; continuous improvement efforts; knowledge sharing across the MEP 
system; and identification of best practices. The collection of this 
data is needed in order to comply with the MEP charter, as mandated by 
Congress.
    Affected Public: NIST MEP Competitive Award Recipients.
    Frequency: Quarterly.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: Jasmeet Seehra, (202) 395-3123.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance 
Officer, (202) 482-0266, Department of Commerce, Room 6616, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at 
[email protected]).
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to, OMB Desk Officer, Jasmeet Seehra, (202) 395-3123, FAX Number (202) 
395-5167, or [email protected]).

    Dated: November 24, 2010.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-30053 Filed 11-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-13-P
```
###### Editorial Note on [Subchapter A of Chapter VIII](/current/title-7/chapter-VIII/subchapter-A)

#### Authority:

[7 U.S.C. 71-87K](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/7/71), [1621-1627](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/7/1621).

###### Editorial Note on [Subchapter A of Chapter VIII](/current/title-7/chapter-VIII/subchapter-A)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at [84 FR 45645](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/84-FR-45645), Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 868.210 Grades and grade requirements for the classes of Rough Rice. (See also [§ 868.212](/on/2024-09-16/title-7/section-868.212).)

| Grade | Maximum limits of— | | | | | | | Color requirements1 (minimum) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Seeds and heat-damaged kernels | | | Red rice and damaged kernels (singly or combined) (Percent) | Chalky kernels1 2 | | Other types3 (Percent) |
| Total (singly or combined) (Number in 500 grams) | Heat-damaged kernels and objectionable seeds (singly or combined) (Number in 500 grams) | Heat-damaged kernels (Number in 500 grams) | In long grain rice (Percent) | In medium or short grain rice (Percent) |
| U.S. No. 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | Shall be white or creamy. |
| U.S. No. 2 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | May be slightly gray. |
| U.S. No. 3 | 10 | 8 | 5 | 2.5 | 4.0 | 6.0 | 3.0 | May be light gray. |
| U.S. No. 4 | 27 | 22 | 15 | 4.0 | 6.0 | 8.0 | 5.0 | May be gray or slight rosy. |
| U.S. No. 5 | 37 | 32 | 25 | 6.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | May be dark gray or rosy. |
| U.S. No. 6 | 75 | 75 | 75 | 4 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 10.0 | May be dark gray or rosy. |
| U.S. Sample grade | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. Sample grade shall be rough rice which: (a) does not meet the requirements for any of the grades from U.S. No. 1 to U.S. No. 6, inclusive; (b) contains more than 14.0 percent of moisture; (c) is musty, or sour, or heating; (d) has any commercially objectionable foreign odor; or (e) is otherwise of distinctly low quality. | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 For the special grade Parboiled rough rice, see [§ 868.212(b)](/on/2024-09-16/title-7/section-868.212#p-868.212(b)). | | | | | | | | |
| 2 For the special grade Glutinous rough rice, see [§ 868.212(d)](/on/2024-09-16/title-7/section-868.212#p-868.212(d)). | | | | | | | | |
| 3 These limits do not apply to the class Mixed Rough Rice. | | | | | | | | |
| 4 Rice in grade U.S. No. 6 shall contain not more than 6.0 percent of damaged kernels. | | | | | | | | |

[[56 FR 55978](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/56-FR-55978), Oct. 31, 1991. Redesignated and amended at [60 FR 16364](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/60-FR-16364), Mar. 30, 1995]
252.211-7006 Reserved.

Parent topic: 252.211 RESERVED
252.227-7028 Technical Data or Computer

Software Previously Delivered to the

Government.

As prescribed in 227.7104 (f)(2), or 227.7203-6 (e), use the following provision:

TECHNICAL DATA OR COMPUTER SOFTWARE PREVIOUSLY DELIVERED TO THE GOVERNMENT

(JUN 1995)

The Offeror shall attach to its offer an identification of all documents or other media incorporating

technical data or computer software it intends to deliver under this contract with other than

unlimited rights that are identical or substantially similar to documents or other media that the

Offeror has produced for, delivered to, or is obligated to deliver to the Government under any

contract or subcontract. The attachment shall identify—

(a) The contract number under which the data or software were produced;

(b) The contract number under which, and the name and address of the organization to whom, the

data or software were most recently delivered or will be delivered; and

(c) Any limitations on the Government's rights to use or disclose the data or software, including,

when applicable, identification of the earliest date the limitations expire.

(End of provision)

Parent topic: 252.227 RESERVED
§ 610.24 Responsibilities of State Technical Committees. ( a ) Each State Technical Committee established under this subpart will meet on a regular basis, as determined by the State Conservationist, to provide information, analysis, and recommendations to appropriate officials of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) who are charged with implementing and establishing priorities and criteria for natural resources conservation activities and programs under Title XII of the Food Security Act of 1985 including, but not limited to, the Agricultural Conservation Easement Program, Conservation Reserve Program, Conservation Security Program, Conservation Stewardship Program, Environmental Quality Incentives Program, Conservation Innovation Grants, Conservation of Private Grazing Land, Grassroots Source Water Protection Program, the Voluntary Public Access and Habitat Incentive Program, and the Regional Conservation Partnership Program. The members of the State Technical Committee may also provide input on other natural resource conservation programs and issues as may be requested by NRCS or other USDA agency heads at the State level as long as they are within the programs authorized by Title XII. Such recommendations may include, but are not limited to, recommendations on: ( 1 ) The criteria to be used in prioritizing program applications;
( 2 ) The State-specific application criteria;
( 3 ) Priority natural resource concerns in the State;
( 4 ) Emerging natural resource concerns and program needs; and
( 5 ) Conservation practice standards and specifications.
( b ) The role of the State Technical Committee is advisory in nature, and the committee will have no implementation or enforcement authority. The implementing agency reserves the authority to accept or reject the committee's recommendations. However, the implementing USDA agency will give strong consideration to the State Technical Committee's recommendations.
( c ) State Technical Committees will review whether Local Working Groups are addressing State priorities.
[74 FR 66912, Dec. 17, 2009, as amended at 79 FR 44639, Aug. 1, 2014]
52.208-7 Tagging of Leased Vehicles.       As prescribed in 8.1104(d), insert a clause substantially as follows:          Tagging of Leased Vehicles (May 1986)          While it is the intent that vehicles leased under this contract will operate on Federal tags, the Government reserves the right to utilize State tags if necessary to accomplish its mission. Should State tags be required, the Contractor shall furnish the Government documentation necessary to allow acquisition of such tags. Federal tags are the responsibility of the Government.          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.208 [Reserved]
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 7 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 1 of 23
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 7 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 2 of 23
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 7 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 3 of 23
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 7 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 4 of 23
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 7 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 5 of 23
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 7 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 6 of 23
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 7 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 7 of 23
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 7 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 8 of 23
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 7 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 9 of 23
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 7 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 10 of 23
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 7 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 11 of 23
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 7 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 12 of 23
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 7 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 13 of 23
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 7 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 14 of 23
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 7 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 15 of 23
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 7 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 16 of 23
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 7 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 17 of 23
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 7 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 18 of 23
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 7 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 19 of 23
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 7 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 20 of 23
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 7 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 21 of 23
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 7 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 22 of 23
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 7 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 23 of 23
222.7405 Contract clause.       Use the clause at 252.222-7006 , Restrictions on the Use of Mandatory Arbitration Agreements, in all solicitations and contracts (including task orders or delivery orders and bilateral modifications adding new work) valued in excess of $1 million utilizing funds appropriated or otherwise made available by the Defense Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Pub. L. 111-118) or subsequent DoD appropriations acts, except in contracts for the acquisition of commercial products, including commercially available off-the-shelf, or commercial services.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 222.74 - RESTRICTIONS ON THE USE OF MANDATORYARBITRATION AGREEMENTS
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.20



THE ORITZ BUILDING  
OFFICE LEASE ADDENDUM


This addendum is entered into as of February 23, 2017 in the City of Burlingame, California between Oritz Properties, Inc. a California corporation (“Landlord”) and Kindred Biosciences Inc. (“Tenant”) and is intended to extend and modify the Lease dated May 16, 2014 between Landlord and Tenant (the “Original Office Lease”). All terms and conditions remain unchanged from Original Office Lease except for the following:


Renewal Lease Date: starts December 1, 2017 Lease Terms: 3 years
Termination Date: November 30, 2020
Premises: 6,900 sq. ft. (Suite 200)
Base Rent:    $2.85 per sq. ft per month ($19,665.00 per month) for the first year
$2.93 per sq. ft per month ($20,217.00 per month) for the second year
$3.02 per sq. ft. per month (20,838.00 per month) for the third year


Security Deposit: $20,838.00 (an additional $3,864.00 to be added to current security deposit of $16,974.00) Cleaning Deposit Fee (per Original lease): $6,900.00


All other terms and conditions of the Original Office Lease remain in full force and effect and are extended throughout the extended Lease Term set forth above.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Addendum.


	
		
	Landlord:


Oritz Properties, Inc.
Vladimir R. Grave
President & CEO


By:   /s/ Vladimir R. Grave   
Its:  President   
Date:  4/6/17
	Tenant


Kindred Biosciences, Inc.
Name:  Richard Chin
Title:  Chief Executive Officer


By:  /s/  Richard Chin   
Its:  CEO
Date:  4/5/17
# 36.508 Other contracts.

The *contracting officer**shall* insert the clause at 52.236-8, Other Contracts, in *solicitations* and contracts when a fixed-price *construction* contract or a fixed-price dismantling, demolition, or removal of improvements contract is contemplated and the contract amount is expected to exceed the *simplified acquisition threshold*. The *contracting officer**may* insert the clause in *solicitations* and contracts when a fixed-price *construction* or a fixed-price contract for dismantling, demolition, or removal of improvements is contemplated and the contract amount is expected to be at or below the *simplified acquisition threshold*.

**Parent topic:**Subpart 36.5 - Contract Clauses