alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| **National Center    for     Health Statistics            Division of Data     Services            6525 Belcrest Road     Hyattsville, MD     20782-2003     (301)458-4636      **

 **Publications and    Information ProductsPublications and Products Home | Search NCHS | Contact    us**
**A B CD E FGHI J KLMNOP Q RSTUVW X Y Z**
An alphabetical directory is provided    for those users who want direct access to individual State and territory information. To    use this valuable tool, you must first determine the State or area where the event    occurred and then select the first letter in the State name from the alphabet. Please    follow the provided **guidelines** to ensure an    accurate response to your request. **The Federal Government does not distribute    certificates, files, or indexes with identifying information for vital records.**      **Also, applications for passports can be obtained through the****U.S. State Department**. 

The entire document is available in Adobe    Acrobat .PDF format for users who want information for every State and U.S. territory.**View/download PDF** 96KB

**Publications and Products Home | Search NCHS | Contact    us**
**CDC Home | Search    | Health Topics A-Z**
This page last reviewed August 18, 2000

**U.S.    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES****Centers    for Disease Control and Prevention**    National Center for Health Statistics    Division of Data Services     Hyattsville, MD    20782-2003    (301) 458-4636
 

 

 

 

  |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 23 Filed 03/28/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 23 Filed 03/28/2007 Page 2 of 2
52.243-6 Change Order Accounting.

As prescribed in 43.205(f), the contracting officer may insert a clause, substantially the same as

follows:

Change Order Accounting (Apr 1984)

The Contracting Officer may require change order accounting whenever the estimated cost of a

change or series of related changes exceeds $100,000. The Contractor, for each change or series of

related changes, shall maintain separate accounts, by job order or other suitable accounting

procedure, of all incurred segregable, direct costs (less allocable credits) of work, both changed and

not changed, allocable to the change. The Contractor shall maintain such accounts until the parties

agree to an equitable adjustment for the changes ordered by the Contracting Officer or the matter is

conclusively disposed of in accordance with the Disputes clause.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.243 [Reserved]
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18U.S.C SECTION 1350)**

 

Theundersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer of Video Display Corporation,certifies that, to the best of his knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Reporton Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2005 (the “Report”),which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Video Display Corporation at the dates and for the periodsindicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) and shall not berelied upon for any other purpose.

 
|   | This  17th day of October, 2005 | /s/  Ronald D. Ordway |   |
|--------|---------------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
|   | Ronald  D. Ordway               |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer        |

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18U.S.C SECTION 1350)**

 

Theundersigned, as the Chief Financial Officer of Video Display Corporation,certifies that, to the best of his knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Reporton Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2005 (the “Report”),which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Video Display Corporation at the dates and for the periodsindicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) and shall not berelied upon for any other purpose.

 
|   | This  17th day of October, 2005 | /s/  Gregory A. Kittle |   |
|--------|---------------------------------|------------------------|--------|
|   | Gregory  A. Kittle              |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer        |

 

Asigned original of these written statements required by Section 906, orother document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of thesewritten statements required by Section 906, has been provided to VideoDisplay Corporation and will be retained by Video Display Corporation andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

Theinformation in this Exhibit 32.1 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposesof Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, norshall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the SecuritiesAct of 1933, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference insuch filing.

 

1

----
----

----

|   | (1) | The Report, containing the financial statements, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MMPI. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                      |   |                                              |
|---------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                      |   |                                              |   |
| Date:  June 21, 2010 | By:    | /s/ RICHARD MERUELO                               |   |
|                      |   | Richard Meruelo                                   |   |
|                      |   | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board |   |
|                      |   |                                              |   |
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with
the Annual Report of Synthesis Energy Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2014 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
Robert Rigdon, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant
to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                  

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:
October 28, 2014



| | /s/ Robert Rigdon                                          
| | -----------------------------------------------------------
| | Robert Rigdon
        President and Chief Executive Officer
|
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

HAROLD KELLY MURPHY, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 

 ) 3:06-cv-618-MEF 

 ) 

SOUTHERN ENERGY HOMES, ) 

INC., et al., ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS AND AFFILIATION OF

MITCHEL H. BOLES

 The undersigned hereby gives notice of his new address and affiliation as follows: 

Mitchel H. Boles, Esq., Johnston Barton Proctor & Rose LLP, 2900 AmSouth/Harbert Plaza, 

1901 Sixth Avenue North, Birmingham, Alabama 35203-2618. 

Dated this the 19th January 2007. 

s/Mitchel H. Boles 

 Mitchel H. Boles (ASB-0813-S69M) 

Johnston Barton Proctor & Rose LLP 

 2900 AmSouth/Harbert Plaza 

 1901 Sixth Avenue North 

 Birmingham, Alabama 35203 

 Telephone: 205-458-9400 

 Facsimile: 205-458-9500 

 Email: mboles@johnstonbarton.com

W. Scott Simpson 

Batchelor & Simpson, P.C. 

3284 Morgan Drive, Suite 112 

Birmingham, Alabama 35216 

Email: ws.simpson@mindspring.com

Attorneys for Southern Energy Homes, Inc. 

Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 22 Filed 01/19/2007 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on January 19, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing Notice of 

Change of Address and Affiliation via the Court’s CM/ECF system, which will electronically 

send notice to the following counsel of record: 

 

 Charles Lance Gould, Esq. 

 Carter Gibson Vance, Esq. 

 Beasley Allen Crown Methvin Portis & Miles PC 

 PO Box 4160 

 Montgomery, AL 36103-4160 

 Email: lance.gould@beasleyallen.com; holly.stroh@beasleyallen.com

 Email: gibson.vance@beasleyallen.com; heidi.bowers@beasleyallen.com

 s/Mitchel H. Boles 

 Of Counsel 

 2

Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 22 Filed 01/19/2007 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 31.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Mark Mareske, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

 

1.               Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Logan County BancShares,Inc.;

 

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)               Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b)   [Reserved];

 

(c)               Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

(d)              Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)               All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)              Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: February 28, 2005 | /s/ Mark Mareske        |   |
|-------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                    | Mark Mareske            |
|                    | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
September 20, 2016

Exemption No. 11908A

Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–1328

Mr. Darryl W. Lee Sr.

G-Space Aerial Imagery LLC

320 Bronco Boulevard

Liberty Hill, TX 78642

Dear Mr. Lee:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition for an amendment. It explains 

the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists any changes to the original conditions 

and limitations.

By letter posted to the public docket on July 21, 2016, you petitioned the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) on behalf of G-Space Aerial Imagery LLC (hereinafter petitioner or 

operator) for an amendment to your current exemption. That exemption from §§ 61.23(a) and 

(c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 

91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows the petitioner to conduct UAS operations. You 

requested an amendment to change the company name from Darryl W. Lee Sr. to G-Space 

Aerial Imagery LLC.

1

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested amendment to the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner. 

 

1 The petitioner also requested to add aircraft. At this time, the FAA is unable to act on this request. When the 

FAA is ready to act, we will proceed accordingly and no further action will be required by the petitioner.
2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 11908

remains valid and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority contained 

in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, the operator is 

granted an amendment to change the operator name.

The operator shall add this amendment to its original exemption.

 

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of amendment, G-Space Aerial Imagery LLC is hereafter referred to as the 

operator. All conditions and limitations within Grant of Exemption No. 11908 remain in 

effect. 

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be 

grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption. 

This exemption terminates on July 31, 2017, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Director, Flight Standards Service
APPENDIX G  - RESERVED Table Of          Contents       PART 1 —GENERAL                                          Part 2 -ARMY ACTIVITY ADDRESS NUMBERS                                          Part 3 -NAVY ACTIVITY ADDRESS NUMBERS                                          Part 4 -MARINE CORPS ACTIVITY ADDRESS NUMBERS                                          Part 5 -AIR FORCE ACTIVITY ADDRESS NUMBERS                                          Part 6 -DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY ACTIVITY ADDRESS NUMBERS                                          Part 7 -DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY ACTIVITY ADDRESS NUMBERS                                          Part 8 -NATIONAL IMAGERY AND MAPPING AGENCY ACTIVITY ADDRESS NUMBERS                                          Part 9 -DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY ACTIVITY ADDRESS NUMBERS                                          Part 10 -MISCELLANEOUS DEFENSE ACTIVITIES ACTIVITY ADDRESS NUMBERS                                          Part 11 -DEFENSE MICROELECTRONICS ACTIVITY                                          Part 12 -MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY ACTIVITY                                          Part 13 -DEFENSE COMMISSARY AGENCY ACTIVITY ADDRESS NUMBERS                                          Part 14 -UNITED STATES SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND ACTIVITY ADDRESS NUMBERS    **Parent topic:** Defense Federal Acquisition RegulationPART 1 —GENERALPart 2 -ARMY ACTIVITY ADDRESS NUMBERSPart 3 -NAVY ACTIVITY ADDRESS NUMBERSPart 4 -MARINE CORPS ACTIVITY ADDRESS NUMBERSPart 5 -AIR FORCE ACTIVITY ADDRESS NUMBERSPart 6 -DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY ACTIVITY ADDRESS NUMBERSPart 7 -DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY ACTIVITY ADDRESS NUMBERSPart 8 -NATIONAL IMAGERY AND MAPPING AGENCY ACTIVITY ADDRESS NUMBERSPart 9 -DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY ACTIVITY ADDRESS NUMBERSPart 10 -MISCELLANEOUS DEFENSE ACTIVITIES ACTIVITY ADDRESS NUMBERSPart 11 -DEFENSE MICROELECTRONICS ACTIVITY       ADDRESS NUMBERPart 12 -MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY ACTIVITY       ADDRESS NUMBERSPart 13 -DEFENSE COMMISSARY AGENCY ACTIVITY ADDRESS NUMBERSPart 14 -UNITED STATES SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND ACTIVITY ADDRESS NUMBERS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-2271

ABRAHAM SANGARY,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General of the

United States,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A96-288-990)

Submitted: May 31, 2006 Decided: June 14, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Abraham Sangary, Petitioner Pro Se. Larry Patrick Cote, UNITED

STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Abraham Mohamed Sangary, a native and citizen of Liberia,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals adopting and affirming the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial

of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and

protection under the Convention Against Torture. 

To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility

for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence he presented was

so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the

requisite fear of persecution.” INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S.

478, 483-84 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and

conclude that Sangary fails to show that the evidence compels a

contrary result. Having failed to qualify for asylum, Sangary

cannot meet the higher standard to qualify for withholding of

removal. Chen v. INS, 195 F.3d 198, 205 (4th Cir. 1999); INS v.

Cardoza-Fonseca, 480 U.S. 421, 430 (1987). In addition, we uphold

the IJ’s finding that Sangary failed to establish that it was more

likely than not that he would be tortured if removed to Liberia.

See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2) (2006). 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2741 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2741

    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Solvent Blue 104.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 4, 2006

 Mr. Reed (for himself and Mr. Chafee) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Solvent Blue 104.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SOLVENT BLUE 104.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.32.72 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Solvent Blue 104) is amended 
by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
225.370 Contracts requiring performance or

delivery in a foreign country.

(a) If the acquisition requires the performance of services or delivery of supplies in an area outside

the United States, follow the procedures at PGI 225.370 (a).

(b) For work performed in Germany, eligibility for logistics support or base privileges of contractor

employees is governed by U.S.-German bilateral agreements. Follow the procedures at Army in

Europe Regulation 715-9, available at

http://www.eur.army.mil/g1/content/CPD/docper/docper_germanyLinks.html under “AE Regs &

Resources.”

(c) For work performed in Japan or Korea, see PGI 225.370 (b) for information on bilateral

agreements and policy relating to contractor employees in Japan or Korea.

(d) For work performed in the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility, follow the procedures

for theater business clearance/contract administration delegation instructions at PGI 225.370 (d).

Parent topic: Subpart 225.3 - CONTRACTS PERFORMED OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES