alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 623.4 Eligible land. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in this section, land is eligible for enrollment in the EWRP only if NRCS determines that the land: ( 1 ) Was inundated by the Midwest floods of 1993;
( 2 ) If restored to productive condition, would have a fair market value that is less than the estimated costs of restoring the land to productive condition and repairing related floodwater control systems;
( 3 ) Is likely to have its wetland value restored with minimal costs; and
( 4 ) Is wetland farmed under natural conditions, a farmed wetland or prior converted wetland, or substantially altered lands which are cropland; or
( 5 ) Is wetland that has been restored on the land under a CRP contract, or under a Federal or State wetland restoration program with an easement for a period of less than 30 years.
( b ) To be eligible for enrollment in the EWRP, land must also: ( 1 ) Be determined by ASCS to have been annually planted or considered planted to an agricultural commodity in at least 1 of the 5 previous crop years; or
( 2 ) Be land under a CRP contract, in which case, the land need only to have been planted to an agricultural commodity during 2 of the 1981 through 1985 crop years.
( c ) Other lands may be considered eligible if the inclusion of such lands in the EWRP easement would significantly add to the functions and values of the wetlands to be restored under this part, as determined by NRCS.
( d ) The criteria and procedures contained in 7 CFR part 12 will be used to identify wetlands, converted wetlands, and farmed wetlands.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than December 20, 2010.

## A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco

(Kenneth Binning, Vice President, Applications and Enforcement) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, California 94105-1579:

1. BOTC Holdings LLC, Lightyear Fund II, L.P.; Lightyear Co-Invest Partnership II, L.P.; Lightyear Fund II GP, L.P.; Lightyear Fund II GP Holdings, LLC; Marron & Associates, LLC; Chestnut Venture Holdings, LLC; Donald B. Marron; Lightyear Capital LLC and Lightyear Capital II, LLC, all of New York, New York; to acquire voting shares of Cascade Bancorp, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of The Bank of the Cascades, both of Bend, Oregon.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 30, 2010.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-30361 Filed 12-2-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### § 623.8 Easement value.

NRCS offers for easements will be based on the fair market value, as determined by the NRCS State Conservationist, of the land covered by the easements. Fair market value will be based on post-flood conditions as if reclaimed. Land easement values will be determined by the State Conservationist in consultation with a technical committee. A technical committee shall included representatives of: ASCS, Extension Service, and FWS. Additionally, the State Conservationist may collect information from other sources as he deems necessary. Coordination between States will be provided by the Chief, NRCS.
# 42.1500 Scope of subpart.

This subpart provides policies and establishes responsibilities for recording and maintaining contractor performance information. This subpart does not apply to procedures used by agencies in determining fees under award or incentive fee contracts. See subpart 16.4. However, the fee amount paid to contractors *should* be reflective of the contractor’s performance and the *past performance* evaluation *should* closely parallel and be consistent with the fee determinations.

**Parent topic:**Subpart 42.15 - Contractor Performance Information
52.247-7 Freight Excluded.       As prescribed in 47.207-3(d)(2), insert a clause substantially as follows in solicitations and contracts for transportation or for transportation-related services when any commodities or types of shipments have been identified for exclusion:          Freight Excluded (Apr 1984)          Excluded from the scope of this contract are shipments that can be more advantageously or economically moved via parcel post or small package carrier; shipments of unusual value, explosives and other dangerous articles, household goods, commodities in bulk, commodities injurious or contaminating to other freight; and shipments that the Government may elect to move in Government vehicles.          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.247 [Reserved]
J~~

.tEO srqr~syU ~~~rWioz ~rq~ PaotE°~ April 14, 2008 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 1 1 CONGRESS STREET, SUITE 1100 BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02114-2023

James Brooks, Director Bureau ofAir Quality Control Department of Environmental Protection State House, Station No. 17 Augusta, Maine 04333-6017 Dear Mr. Brooks: By letter dated February 28, 2008, we received your request to amend the Maine State Implementation Plan (SIP) . The SIP submittal consists of amendments to Maine's Chapter 152 rule, Control of Volatile Organic Compounds fromConsumer Products. We have determined that this submittal is administratively and technically complete, and are currently reviewing the rule to determine its approvability. If you or your staff have anyquestions regarding EPA's action on this submittal, please contact Ariel Garcia at (617) 918-1660 .

S. Perkins, Director Office of Ecosystem

Protection cc: Andrea Lani, ME-DEP

Toll Free 9 1-888-372-7341 Internet Address (URL) " http://www .epa.gov/regionl Recycled/Recyclable " Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 30%Postconsumer)
# C_2014222EN.01001201.xml

| 12.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/12

---

Corrigendum to Decision of the Management Board of Europol of 18 April 2014 amending the Decision of the Europol Management Board of 16 November 1999 agreeing to the conditions and procedures laid down by Europol regarding taxes applicable to salaries and emoluments paid to Europol staff members for the benefit of Europol

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 211 of 5 July 2014
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 211 of 5 July 2014

2014/C 222/10

On page 10, footnote 7 should read as follows:

‘Notice on the adjustment of basic salaries and allowances applicable to Europol staff subject to the Europol Staff Regulations pursuant to Article 57(5) of the Council Decision with effect from 1 July 2009 and 1 July 2010 (see page 15 of this Official Journal).’

---
Case 3:20-cr-00057-MCR Document 29 Filed 01/26/21 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:20-cr-00057-MCR Document 29 Filed 01/26/21 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:20-cr-00057-MCR Document 29 Filed 01/26/21 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 11.1
                    PARACELSUS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
                   (In thousands, except per share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                         Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
                                             June 30,             June 30,
                                      ---------------------   ----------------
                                         1997        1996       1997    1996
                                      ----------   --------   ------- --------
<S>                                   <C>          <C>        <C>     <C>
PRIMARY:
(1) Net income (loss)                 $(3,017)     $(5,162)   $2,151  $(19,511)
                                        =====        =====     =====    ======
    Shares used in this computation:
    Weighted average common shares
      outstanding                      54,879       29,772    54,847    29,772 
    Shares applicable to stock options
      and warrants, net of shares
      assumed to be purchased from
      proceeds at average market price      -            -     1,427         -
                                       ------       ------    ------    ------
(2) Total shares for net income
      per share computation            54,879       29,772    56,274    29,772
                                       ======       ======    ======    ======
    Income (loss) per share:
      Continuing operations           $ (0.05)     $ (0.04)  $  0.04  $  (0.14)
      Discontinued operations               -        (0.13)        -     (0.52)
                                        -----        -----      ----     -----
    Net income (loss) per share
        (1 divided by 2)              $ (0.05)     $ (0.17)  $  0.04  $  (0.66)
                                         ====        =====      ====     =====
FULLY DILUTED:
(3) Net income (loss) (1)             $(3,017)     $(5,162)  $ 2,151  $(19,511)
                                        =====        =====     =====    ======
    Shares used in this computation:
    Total primary shares (2)           54,879       29,772    56,274    29,772
    Shares applicable to stock options
      and warrants in addition to
      those used in primary computation,
      using period-end market
      price when higher than average        -            -         -         -
                                        -----       ------    ------    ------
(4) Total fully diluted shares         54,879       29,772    56,274    29,772
    Income (loss) per share:
      Continuing operations           $ (0.05)     $ (0.04)  $  0.04   $ (0.14)
      Discontinued operations               -        (0.13)        -     (0.52)
                                        -----         ----      ----     -----
    Net income (loss) per share
      (3 divided by 4)                $ (0.05)     $ (0.17)  $  0.04   $ (0.66)
                                        =====         ====      ====     =====
</TABLE>
# L_2014016EN.01006901.xml

| 21.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 16/69 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 16/69

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 41/2014 of 17 January 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 14 of 18 January 2014
  )

On page 12, table of the Annex:

for:

| ‘0805 20 30 , 0805 20 50 , 0805 20 70 , 0805 20 90 | CL | 63,3 ’ |
| --- | --- | --- |

‘0805 20 30 , 0805 20 50 , 0805 20 70 , 0805 20 90

CL

63,3 ’

read:

| ‘0805 20 30 , 0805 20 50 , 0805 20 70 , 0805 20 90 | CN | 63,3 ’ |
| --- | --- | --- |

‘0805 20 30 , 0805 20 50 , 0805 20 70 , 0805 20 90

CN

63,3 ’

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

LEROY WILLIAMS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

STATE OF ALABAMA DEPARTMENT 

OF TRANSPORTATION, JOE MCINNES, 

in his official capacity as Director of the 

State of Alabama Department of 

Transportation, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 

CASE NO. 2:06-cv-658-ID 

DEFENDANTS’ SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENTIARY SUBMISSION

COME NOW Defendants, the State of Alabama Department of Transportation and Joe 

McInnes, and file the following supplemental evidentiary materials in support of their Reply to 

Plaintiff’s Response (Doc. No. 31) to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 

13): 

Exhibit: 

CC MapQuest directions from 1409 Coliseum Boulevard, Montgomery, 

Alabama, to 630 15th Street, Tuscaloosa, Alabama; and 

Affidavit: 

Affidavit of Joe E. Jones. 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED 

TROY KING 

ATTORNEY GENERAL 

s/ Andrew W. Redd 

Jim R. Ippolito, Jr. (IPP001) 

Assistant Attorney General 

Chief Counsel 

Andrew W. Redd (RED001) 

Case 2:06-cv-00658-TFM Document 34 Filed 06/05/2007 Page 1 of 3
Assistant Attorney General 

Assistant Counsel 

ADDRESS OF COUNSEL: 

State of Alabama Department of Transportation 

1409 Coliseum Boulevard 

Montgomery, Alabama 36110 

Telephone: (334) 242-6350 

Facsimile: (334) 264-4359 

redda@dot.state.al.us 

2

Case 2:06-cv-00658-TFM Document 34 Filed 06/05/2007 Page 2 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

LEROY WILLIAMS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

STATE OF ALABAMA DEPARTMENT 

OF TRANSPORTATION, JOE MCINNES, 

in his official capacity as Director of the 

State of Alabama Department of 

Transportation, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 

CASE NO. 2:06-cv-658-ID 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that, on June 5, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk 

of the Court using the CM/ECT system, which will send notification to the following: 

Mr. Russell W. Adams, Esq. 

Wiggins, Childs, Quinn & Pantazis, L.L.C. 

Attorneys at Law 

301 19th Street, North 

Birmingham, Alabama 35203 

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF 

s/ Andrew W. Redd 

Andrew W. Redd (RED001) 

Assistant Attorney General 

Assistant Counsel 

ADDRESS OF COUNSEL: 

State of Alabama Department of Transportation 

1409 Coliseum Boulevard 

Montgomery, Alabama 36110 

(334) 242-6350 (office) 

(334) 264-4359 (facsimile) 

redda@dot.state.al.us 

3

Case 2:06-cv-00658-TFM Document 34 Filed 06/05/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00658-TFM Document 34-2 Filed 06/05/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00658-TFM Document 34-2 Filed 06/05/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00658-TFM Document 34-3 Filed 06/05/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00658-TFM Document 34-3 Filed 06/05/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### § 58.430 Milk.

The milk shall be fresh, sweet, pleasing and desirable in flavor and shall meet the requirements as outlined under §§ 58.132 through 58.138. The milk may be adjusted by separating part of the fat from the milk or by adding one or more of the following dairy products: Cream, skim milk, concentrated skim milk, nonfat dry milk, and water in a quantity sufficient to reconstitute any concentrated or dry milk used. Such dairy products shall have originated from raw milk meeting the same requirements as outlined under §§ 58.132 through 58.138.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000759641
<NAME> AEI REAL ESTATE FUND 85-A LTD PARTNERSHIP

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         199,208
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               199,208
<PP&E>                                       5,260,076
<DEPRECIATION>                               (772,856)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,686,428
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          127,428
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,559,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,686,428
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               331,899
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  129,248
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                202,651
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            202,651
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   202,651
<EPS-BASIC>                                      28.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    28.34


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2843 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2843

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain footwear with outer soles of 
            rubber or plastics and with open toes or heels.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 18, 2006

 Mr. Brownback introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on certain footwear with outer soles of 
            rubber or plastics and with open toes or heels.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN FOOTWEAR WITH OUTER SOLES OF RUBBER OR PLASTICS AND 
              WITH OPEN TOES OR HEELS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.13.82      Footwear with       Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         outer soles of                                                     31/2009
                         rubber or
                         plastics and
                         uppers of textile
                         materials other
                         than of vegetable
                         fibers, with open
                         toes or open
                         heels, the
                         foregoing other
                         than house
                         slippers and
                         other than
                         footwear for
                         women (provided
                         for in subheading
                         6404.19.30)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 632.12 Funding priorities. ( a ) All eligible applications within a State are to be assigned a funding priority and subpriority. Assignment of a priority and subpriority establishes the order in which the proposed reclamation work will be selected and evaluated for funding. (See § 632.20(b) for additional selection criteria.) Applications for individual, joint, or special projects (See § 632.18) for areas of different priorities or subpriorities are to be assigned the highest applicable priority or subpriority. The funding priorities are as follows: ( 1 ) *Priority 1.* Protection of public health, safety, general welfare, and property from extreme danger of adverse effects of coal-mining practices. Extreme danger means a condition that could be expected to cause substantial physical harm to persons, property, or the environment and to which persons or improvements on real property are exposed.
( 2 ) *Priority 2.* Protection of public health, safety, and general welfare from the adverse effects of coal-mining practices that do not constitute an extreme danger.
( 3 ) *Priority 3.* Restoration of the land and water resources and the environment where previously degraded by the adverse effects of coal-mining practices, including measures for the conservation and development of soil, water (excluding channelization), woodland, fish and wildlife, recreation resources, and agricultural productivity. First consideration in this priority is to be the reduction of offsite damage affecting the public. Second consideration is to be given to restoring to beneficial uses for the main benefit of the land user.
( b ) Eligible and feasible applications for program assistance within each priority category (§ 632.12(a)) are to be funded in the following order: ( 1 ) Individual persons or public entities who owned the eligible area before May 2, 1977, and who neither consented to nor exercised control over the mining operation.
( 2 ) Individual persons who would actively use the area, if reclaimed, for agricultural or silvicultural purposes.
( 3 ) All other participants.
[43 FR 44749, Sept. 28, 1978, as amended at 45 FR 65181, Oct. 2, 1980]
52.203-6 Restrictions on Subcontractor Sales

to the Government.

As prescribed in 3.503-2 , insert the following clause:

Restrictions on Subcontractor Sales to the Government (Jun 2020)

(a) Except as provided in (b) of this clause, the Contractor shall not enter into any agreement with

an actual or prospective subcontractor, nor otherwise act in any manner, which has or may have the

effect of restricting sales by such subcontractors directly to the Government of any item or process

(including computer software) made or furnished by the subcontractor under this contract or under

any follow-on production contract.

(b) The prohibition in (a) of this clause does not preclude the Contractor from asserting rights that

are otherwise authorized by law or regulation.

(c) The Contractor agrees to incorporate the substance of this clause, including this paragraph (c), in

all subcontracts under this contract which exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, as defined in

Federal Acquisition Regulation 2.101 on the date of subcontract award.

(End of clause)

Alternate I (Nov 2021). As prescribed in 3.503-2 , substitute the following paragraph in place of

paragraph (b) of the basic clause:

(b) The prohibition in paragraph (a) of this clause does not preclude the Contractor from asserting

rights that are otherwise authorized by law or regulation. For acquisitions of commercial products or

commercial services). the prohibition in paragraph (a) applies only to the extent that any agreement

restricting sales by subcontractors results in the Federal Government being treated differently from

any other prospective purchaser for the sale of the commercial product(s) and commercial

service(s).

Parent topic: 52.203 [Reserved]