alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 66.7 Updates to the List of Bioengineered Foods. ( a ) *Updates to the List.* AMS will review and consider updates to the List on an annual basis and will solicit recommendations regarding updates to the List through notification in the Federal Register and on the AMS website. ( 1 ) Recommendations regarding additions to and subtractions from the List may be submitted to AMS at any time or as part of the annual review process.
( 2 ) Recommendations should be accompanied by data and other information to support the recommended action.
( 3 ) AMS will post public recommendations on its website, along with information about other revisions to the List that the agency may be considering, including input based on consultation with the government agencies responsible for oversight of the products of biotechnology: USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (USDA-APHIS), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the Department of Health and Human Services' Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and appropriate members of the Coordinated Framework for the Regulation of Biotechnology or a similar successor.
( 4 ) AMS will consider whether foods proposed for inclusion on the List have been authorized for commercial production somewhere in the world, and whether the food is currently in legal commercial production for human food somewhere in the world.
( 5 ) If AMS determines that an update to the List is appropriate following its review of all relevant information provided, AMS will modify the List.
( b ) *Compliance period.* Regulated entities will have 18 months following the effective date of the updated List of Bioengineered Foods to revise food labels to reflect changes to the List in accordance with the disclosure requirements of this part.
# Subpart 204.1 - CONTRACT EXECUTION

**Parent topic:**Part 204 - ADMINISTRATIVE AND INFORMATION MATTERS

## 204.101 Contracting officer's signature.

Follow the procedures at PGI                 204.101              for signature of contract documents.
|T H E   W H I T E   H O U S E

Bulletin No. 99-07, Supplement 4

Help

Text Only | T H E   W H I T E   H O U S E    | Bulletin No. 99-07, Supplement 4 | Help

Text Only
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------- | -------------------------------- | ---------------
|T H E   W H I T E   H O U S E                                                    | Bulletin No. 99-07, Supplement 4 | Help

Text Only                 

|
|

|November 10, 1999

BULLETIN NO. 99-07, Supplement No. 4TO THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND ESTABLISHMENTSSUBJECT: Apportionment Under the Extension of the Continuing Resolution for Fiscal 

Year 20001. Purpose and background. H. J. Res. 78 extends the continuing resolution through 

November 17, 19992. Apportionment. I am extending the automatic apportionment specified in section 2 of 

OMB Bulletin No. 99-07 to November 17, 1999. The portion of the year covered is now 13.1 percent.If you can justify amounts greater than the amount automatically 

apportioned, please submit a written request for apportionment.Jacob J. LewDirector



The Budget
 | 
Legislative Information
 | 
Management Reform/GPRA
 | 
Grants Management
Financial Management
 | 
Procurement
        Policy
 | 
Information &
        Regulatory Policy

Privacy Statement
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### § 657.3 Applicability.

Inventories made under this memorandum do not constitute a designation of any land area to a specific land use. Such designations are the responsibility of appropriate local and State officials.
- 2023 Annual Report to Congress
              - 2022 Annual Report to Congress
              - 2021 Annual Report to Congress
              - 2020 Annual Report to Congress
              - 2019 Annual Report to Congress
              - 2018 Annual Report to Congress
              - 2017 Annual Report to Congress
              - 2016 Annual Report to Congress
              - 2015 Annual Report to Congress
              - 2014 Annual Report to Congress
              - 2013 Annual Report to Congress
              - 2012 Annual Report to Congress
              - 2011 Annual Report to Congress
              - 2010 Annual Report to Congress
              - 2009 Annual Report to Congress
              - 2008 Annual Report to Congress
              - 2007 Annual Report to Congress
              - 2006 Annual Report to Congress
              - 2005 Annual Report to Congress
              - 2004 Annual Report to Congress
              - 2003 Annual Report to Congress
              - 2002 Annual Report to Congress
              - 2001 Annual Report to Congress
              - 2000 Annual Report to Congress

PDF Help 

Last Updated: May 2, 2024
****OMB Bulletin No. 98-01****
****OMB Home****

October 29, 1997

BULLETIN NO. 98-01, Supplement No. 1

TO THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND ESTABLISHMENTS

SUBJECT: Apportionment Under Continuing Resolutions for Fiscal Year 1998

1. **Purpose.** This Supplement provides instructions on apportionment of amounts provided by continuing resolutions (CR) for FY 1998.

2. **Background.** The second CR (H.J.RES. 97) extended the first CR (P-L. 105-46) through November 7, 1998.

3. **Automatic Apportionment.** This Supplement supersedes previous apportionments (made automatically or in writing) of amounts provided by the first CR.

The amounts automatically apportioned by this Supplement are available through the period ending November 7, 1997, and are calculated by multiplying the rate provided by the CR by 10.4 %. For the rate provided, use the rate for operations ***not exceeding tire current rate*** for the project or activity, *except if*:

(a) **The President's Budget request, the amount as passed by the House (if any)**, and the **Senate (if any) are less than the amount for current operations**. Use the rate for operations not exceeding the ***greater*** of the rates that would be provided by the budget request the amount as passed the House, or the amount as passed the Senate for the account.
(b) **Zero-funded by the House and/or Senate but the project or activity was conducted in****FY 1997 and there is an FY 1998 budget request**. Use the rate for operations not exceeding the ***lesser*** of the rates that would be provided by the budget request or the rate for current operations for the account.
4. **Written Apportionment.** A written apportionment is required if an amount different from the total amount automatically apportioned by this Supplement is needed.
**Franklin D. Raines***Director*
Privacy Statement
The BudgetLegislative InformationManagement Reform/GPRAGrants ManagementFinancial ManagementProcurement PolicyInformation & Regulatory Policy

Help

T H E   W H I T E   H O U S E
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Attitude ChangeCareer DevelopmentCareer EducationCommunity EducationEducation Work RelationshipEducational PracticesLearning ProcessesProblem Based LearningProblem SolvingSecondary EducationSelf EfficacyStudent Empowerment

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6580

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. QUINN AUSIDI GOFFIGAN , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Raymond A. Jackson , District Judge. ( 2:16

- cr - 00034

- RAJ

- LRL

- 1; 2:17

- cv - 00504

- RAJ )

Submitted : October 5, 2018 Decided: November 7, 2018

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Quinn Ausidi Goffigan, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Quinn Ausidi Goffigan seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue abs ent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the distr ict court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Goffigan has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argumen t would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 2:06- cr-169-WHA 

 )

WILLIAM EARL ULMER )

MOTION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD PROSEQUENDUM

TO THE HONORABLE , UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE:

Comes now the United States of America, by and through its Attorney for the Middle District

of Alabama, and represents and shows unto the Court that there is pending in the United States

District Court forthe Middle District of Alabama an indictment against WILLIAM EARL ULMER,

now in custody of the Lafayette Parish Jail, Lafayette, LA, and that said cause is set for arraignment

at 10am on March 7, 2007, before this Honorable Court to be held at Montgomery, Alabama.

WHEREFORE, the United States Attorney prays that your Honor will direct theClerk of this

Court to issue a WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD PROSEQUENDUM addressed to the Lafayette

Parish Jail, Lafayette, LA, commanding them to deliver said prisoner, WILLIAM EARL ULMER,

to any United States Marshal or Deputy United States Marshal and directing said Marshal or Deputy

to bring said prisoner before this Honorable Court at Montgomery, Alabama. 

Respectfully submitted this 21st day of February, 2007.

LEURA G. CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

s/ A. Clark Morris

A. CLARK MORRIS ASB-1613-N77A

Assistant United States Attorney

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334)223-7280 Fax: (334)223-7135

E-mail: clark. morris@usdoj.gov

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 27 Filed 02/21/2007 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3059 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3059

    To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on difenoconazole.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

  Mr. DeWine introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on difenoconazole.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DIFENOCONAZOLE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.02.12 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to difenoconazole) is amended 
by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 772.17 Equal opportunity and non-discrimination requirements.

With respect to any aspect of a credit transaction, the Agency will comply with the requirements of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and the Department's civil rights policy in 7 CFR part 15d.

[72 FR 64121, Nov. 15, 2007]
Subpart 252.1 - INSTRUCTIONS FOR USING

PROVISIONS AND CLAUSES

Parent topic: Part 252 - SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES

252.101 Using part 252.

(b) Numbering.

(2) Provisions or clauses that supplement the FAR.

(ii)(B) DFARS provisions or clauses use a four digit sequential number in the 7000 series, e.g., -7000,

-7001, -7002. Department or agency supplemental provisions or clauses use four digit sequential

numbers in the 9000 series.

252.103 Identification of provisions and clauses.

For guidance on numbering department or agency provisions and clauses, see PGI 252.103
52.225-17 Evaluation of Foreign Currency

Offers.

As prescribed in 25.1103 (c)(, insert the following provision:

Evaluation of Foreign Currency Offers (Feb 2000)

If the Government receives offers in more than one currency, the Government will evaluate offers by

converting the foreign currency to United States currency using [Contracting Officer to insert

source of rate] in effect as follows:

(a) For acquisitions conducted using sealed bidding procedures, on the date of bid opening.

(b) For acquisitions conducted using negotiation procedures-

(1) On the date specified for receipt of offers, if award is based on initial offers; otherwise

(2) On the date specified for receipt of proposal revisions.

(End of provision)

Parent topic: 52.225 [Reserved]
252.205-7000 Provision of Information to

Cooperative Agreement Holders.

As prescribed in 205.470 , use the following clause:

PROVISION OF INFORMATION TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT HOLDERS (JUN 2023)

(a) Definition. “Cooperative agreement holder” means a State or local government; a private,

nonprofit organization; a tribal organization (as defined in section 4(c) of the Indian SelfDetermination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 5304(l))); or an economic enterprise (as

defined in section 3(e) of the Indian Financing Act of 1974 (25 U.S.C. 1452(e))) whether such

economic enterprise is organized for profit or nonprofit purposes; which has an agreement with the

Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment to furnish procurement technical

assistance to business entities.

(b) The Contractor shall provide cooperative agreement holders, upon their request, with a list of

those appropriate employees or offices responsible for entering into subcontracts under defense

contracts. The list shall include the business address, telephone number, and area of responsibility

of each employee or office.

(c) The Contractor need not provide the listing to a particular cooperative agreement holder more

frequently than once a year.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 252.205 RESERVED
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 26 Filed 01/11/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 26 Filed 01/11/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 26-2 Filed 01/11/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 26-2 Filed 01/11/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 26-2 Filed 01/11/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 26-2 Filed 01/11/2007 Page 4 of 4
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 26-3 Filed 01/11/2007 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 33.2
                                  ------------

           ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA



The Bank of New York and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N. A.
(collectively, the "Company") provides this platform-level assessment of
compliance with the servicing criteria specified in Item 1122(d) of Regulation
AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Management has determined that the following servicing criteria are applicable
in regards to the following servicing platform for the following period:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially
required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential
mortgage-backed securities and other mortgage-related asset-backed securities
issued on or after January 1, 2006 (and like-kind transactions issued prior to
January 1, 2006) for which the Company provides trustee, securities
administration, paying agent or custodial services. The platform includes like
kind transactions for which the Company provided trustee, securities
administrator, paying agent or custodial services as a result of the Company's
acquisition as of October 1, 2006 of portions of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s
corporate trust business, including structured finance agency and trust
transactions.

Applicable Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d), to the extent required by the related transaction agreements as to
any transaction, except for the following criteria: 1122 (d) (1)(ii), (iii),
(iv), (4) (iv), (v), (vi), (vii), (viii), (ix), (x), (xi), (xii) and (xiii).

Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2006.

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the
following assessment of compliance in respect of the Applicable Servicing
Criteria:

o  The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria.

o  The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

o  As of December 31, 2006 and for the Period, the Company was in material
compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.



                                      1
<PAGE>


Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has
issued an attestation report with respect to the Company's foregoing
assessment of compliance.



      The Bank of New York                    The Bank of New York
      The Bank of New York Trust              The Bank of New York Trust
         Company, N.A.                           Company, N.A.


      /s/ Robert L. Griffin                   /s/ Patrick J. Tadie
      ---------------------------             ---------------------------
      Robert L. Griffin                       Patrick J. Tadie
      Authorized Signer                       Authorized Signer


March 1, 2007



                                      2
# 52.244-1 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**52.244 [Reserved]
206.000 Scope of part.

For information on the various approaches that may be used to competitively fulfill DoD

requirements, see PGI 206.000 .

Parent topic: Part 206 - COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS
# 52.252 [Reserved]

- 52.252-1 Solicitation Provisions Incorporated by Reference. 
- 52.252-2 Clauses Incorporated by Reference. 
- 52.252-3 Alterations in Solicitation. 
- 52.252-4 Alterations in Contract. 
- 52.252-5 Authorized Deviations in Provisions. 
- 52.252-6 Authorized Deviations in Clauses. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 52.2 - Text of Provisions and Clauses
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 273 

To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 to extend 

and improve national dairy market loss payments. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2005 

Mr. COLEMAN (for himself, Mr. KOHL, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. SPECTER, Mr. 

GRAHAM, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. THUNE, Mr. VITTER, Mr. 

JOHNSON, Mr. DEWINE, Mr. BIDEN, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. SCHUMER, Ms. 

SNOWE, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mrs. CLINTON, Mr. DAYTON, Mr. JEFFORDS, 

Mr. DODD, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. KERRY, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. DORGAN, Mr. BOND, and Mr. HARKIN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act 

of 2002 to extend and improve national dairy market 

loss payments. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NATIONAL DAIRY MARKET LOSS PAYMENTS. 

4 Section 1502 of the Farm Security and Rural Invest5 ment Act of 2002 (7 U.S.C. 7982) is amended— 
2 

•S 273 IS 

1 (1) in the first sentence of subsection (d)(2), by 

2 striking ‘‘2,400,000’’ and inserting ‘‘4,800,000’’; 

3 and 

4 (2) in subsections (f) and (g)(1), by striking 

5 ‘‘2005’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘2007’’. 

Æ
EXHIBIT 35.1
                  SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                        RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC
              RALI SERIES 2006-QA8 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized officer of Residential Funding Company, LLC,
as servicer  (the  "Servicer")  pursuant to the Series  Supplement,  dated as of
September 1, 2006,  and the Standard  Terms of Pooling and Servicing  Agreement,
dated as of March 1, 2006 (as amended from time to time, the "Agreement"), among
Residential  Accredit Loans, Inc., as company,  Residential Funding Company, LLC
(formerly  Residential Funding  Corporation),  as master servicer,  and Deutsche
Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, does hereby certify that:
1. A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during  the  period  covered  by the
Issuing Entity's report on Form 10-K and of the Servicer's performance under the
Agreement  has been made under my  supervision.  2. To the best of my knowledge,
based on such review,  the Servicer has fulfilled all of its  obligations  under
the Agreement in all material respects throughout such period.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:      /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      ------------------------
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title:    Managing Director