alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         535,600
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,682,900
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,339,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,238,500
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,339,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,048,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  471,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               276,800
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             126,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                209,500
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 35,500
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   174,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .70
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 3, 2019 p0402

Order 

Clerk

May 3, 2019

159206-7

In re M.J. DAWKINS, Minor.

SC: 159206-7

COA: 344285; 344316

Bay CC Family Division:

16-012182-NA

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 5, 2019 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the 

case of In re Ferranti (Docket No. 157907-8) is pending on appeal before this Court and 

that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for 

leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the 

decision in that case.
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2650

AN ACT

To designate the Federal courthouse to be constructed in

Greenville, South Carolina, as the ‘‘Carroll A. Campbell,

Jr. Federal Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

S 2650 ES

1 SECTION 1. CARROLL A. CAMPBELL, JR. FEDERAL COURT2 HOUSE.

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Federal courthouse to be

4 constructed in Greenville, South Carolina, building num5 ber SC0017ZZ, shall be known and designated as the

6 ‘‘Carroll A. Campbell, Jr. Federal Courthouse’’.

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United

9 States to the Federal courthouse referred to in subsection

10 (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Carroll A.

11 Campbell, Jr. Federal Courthouse.

Passed the Senate June 27, 2006.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2650

AN ACT

To designate the Federal courthouse to be con-

‘‘Carroll A. Campbell, Jr. Federal Courthouse’’.structed in Greenville, South Carolina, as the
EXHIBIT 35.3
                  SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                           HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL, LLC
              RALI SERIES 2006-QO7 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of Homecomings  Financial,  LLC, as
servicer (the "Servicer") pursuant to the applicable  servicing agreement,  does
hereby certify that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under  the   applicable   servicing   agreement  has  been  made  under  my
     supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing  agreement
     in all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:      /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      ------------------------
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title:    Managing Director
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 24 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 1 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 24 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 2 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 24 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 3 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 24 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 4 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 24 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 5 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 24 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 6 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 24 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 7 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 24 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 8 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 24 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 9 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 24 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 10 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 24 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 11 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 24 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 12 of 12
#### BOLGER, Respondent, v. HAAS TOBACCO CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

May 29, 1914.)

Action by Joseph Bolger, an infant, etc., against the Haas Tobacco Company.

No opinion. Motion for leave to appeal to Court of Appeals denied, with $10 costs. For former decisions, see 147 N. Y. Supp. 1099.
EXHIBIT 35.2
                  SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                               GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC
              RALI SERIES 2006-QA8 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of GMAC Mortgage,  LLC, as servicer
(the "Servicer")  pursuant to the applicable  servicing  agreement,  does hereby
certify that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under  the   applicable   servicing   agreement  has  been  made  under  my
     supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing  agreement
     in all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:      /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      ------------------------
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title:    Executive Vice President
1 

B SLW 745543 v1 

1039265-000044 5/1/2007 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE 

DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION 

VFS LEASING CO. ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 

vs. ) 3:06cv638-SRW 

 ) 

G.F. KELLY, INC. d/b/a KELLY ) 

TRUCKING; and GUY KELLY, ) 

 ) 

 Defendants ) 

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Julie A. Cottingham has changed law 

firms and her new contact information will be: Julie A. Cottingham, Esq., 

BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN, CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ, 420 20th

Street North, Suite 1600, Birmingham, AL 35203, telephone number (205) 

244-3811, fax number (205) 488-3811, email address 

jcottingham@bakerdonelson.com. 

/s/ Julie A. Cottingham 

Julie A. Cottingham, COT017 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

OF COUNSEL:

Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz 

420 20th Street North 

Suite 1600 

Birmingham, Alabama 35203 

Phone: (205) 250-8330 

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 39 Filed 05/11/2007 Page 1 of 2
2 

B SLW 745543 v1 

1039265-000044 5/1/2007 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have served a copy of the foregoing document 

upon the parties listed below by filing via the CM/ECF electronic filing 

system on May 11, 2007: 

James H. Starnes 

Attorney for Defendants 

PO Box 590003 

Birmingham, AL 35259 

(205) 320-0800 

S. Sanford Holliday 

Attorney for Defendants 

PO Box 727 

Roanoke, AL 36274 

(334) 863-2717 

/s/ Julie A. Cottingham 

 OF COUNSEL 

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 39 Filed 05/11/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 18 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 1 of 18
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 18 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 2 of 18
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 18 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 3 of 18
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 18 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 4 of 18
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 18 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 5 of 18
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 18 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 6 of 18
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 18 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 7 of 18
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 18 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 8 of 18
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 18 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 9 of 18
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 18 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 10 of 18
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 18 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 11 of 18
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 18 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 12 of 18
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 18 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 13 of 18
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 18 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 14 of 18
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 18 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 15 of 18
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 18 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 16 of 18
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 18 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 17 of 18
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 18 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 18 of 18
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 18-2 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 18-2 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 18-2 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 18-3 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 1 of 11
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 18-3 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 2 of 11
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 18-3 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 3 of 11
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 18-3 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 4 of 11
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 18-3 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 5 of 11
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 18-3 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 6 of 11
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 18-3 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 7 of 11
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 18-3 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 8 of 11
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 18-3 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 9 of 11
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 18-3 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 10 of 11
Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 18-3 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 11 of 11
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 2:06-mj72-DRB

 )

JOSHUA WAYNE HESTER )

 

GOVERNMENT’S OBJECTION TO CONTINUANCE AND

RENEWED MOTION FOR EXPEDITED HEARING

Comes now the United States of America, by and through Leura G. Canary, United States

Attorney for the Middle District of Alabama, and makes its objection to the continuance filed by the

defendant, and respectfully renews its motion for an expedited hearing on its appeal of the Magistrate

Court’s release order of August 2, 2006. In support of its motion, the government offers the

following: 

1. The government has moved for an expedited hearing in its appeal of the release order

dated August 3, 2006, and the Court has scheduled a hearing for August 11, 2006. 

2. Defense counsel has moved for a continuance based on a previously scheduled hearing

in the Circuit Court of Montgomery, Alabama. In addition, defense counsel would like to make an

out-of-state trip with his wife after the hearing in State Court.

3. The United States opposes the continuance because the defendant’s release poses a

continued danger to any other person and the community. Specifically, despite a finding of probable

cause that the defendant has produced child pornography, and a pending state court indictment for

the rape and molestation of two different girls, the defendant was released to live in the home of two

children, ages 12 and 14. 

Case 2:06-mj-00072-DRB Document 14 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 1 of 3
2

4. Based on the nature of the charges and the immediate concerns for the safety of any person

and the community brought on by the defendant’s release, the government respectfully objects to the

defendant’s motion and renews its request for an expedited hearing in this matter. 

Respectfully submitted this the 8 day of August, 2006. th

LEURA G. CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/ K. David Cooke, Jr.

K. DAVID COOKE, JR.

Assistant United States Attorney

Suite 201, One Court Square

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334) 223-7280

FAX: (334) 223-7280

E-mail: david.cooke@usdoj.gov

Case 2:06-mj-00072-DRB Document 14 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 2 of 3
3

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 2:06-mj72-DRB

 )

JOSHUA WAYNE HESTER )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 8, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of

the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following: 

Stephen Roger Glassroth, Esq.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/K. David Cooke, Jr.

K. DAVID COOKE, JR.

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334)223-7280

Fax: (334)223-7135

E-mail: david.cooke@usdoj.gov

Case 2:06-mj-00072-DRB Document 14 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 3 of 3
Editorial Note on Part 869
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 869 appear at 84 FR 45646, Aug. 30, 2019.

§ 869.100 Application. ( a ) An applicant for a license must submit to AMS information and documents determined by AMS to be sufficient to conclude that the applicant can comply with the provisions of the Act. Such documents must include a current review or an audit-level financial statement prepared according to generally accepted accounting standards as defined by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. For any entity that is not an individual, a document that establishes proof of the existence of the entity, such as: ( 1 ) For a partnership, an executed partnership agreement; and
( 2 ) For a corporation: ( i ) Articles of incorporation certified by the Secretary of State of the applicable State of incorporation;
( ii ) Bylaws; and
( iii ) Permits to do business; and
( 3 ) For a limited partnership, an executed limited partnership agreement; and
( 4 ) For a limited liability company: ( i ) Articles of organization or similar documents; and
( ii ) Operating agreement or similar agreement.
( b ) The warehouse facilities of an operator licensed under the Act must, as determined by AMS, be: ( 1 ) Physically and operationally suitable for proper storage of the applicable agricultural product or agricultural products specified in the license;
( 2 ) Operated according to generally accepted warehousing activities and practices in the industry for the applicable agricultural product or agricultural products stored in the facility; and
( 3 ) Subject to the warehouse operator's control of the facility including all contiguous storage space with respect to such facilities.
( c ) As specified in individual licensing agreements, a warehouse operator must: ( 1 ) Meet the basic financial requirements determined by AMS; and
( 2 ) Meet the net worth requirements determined by AMS;
( d ) In order to obtain a license, the warehouse operator must correct any exceptions made by the warehouse examiner at the time of the original warehouse examination.
( e ) AMS may issue a license for the storage of two or more agricultural products in a single warehouse as provided in the applicable licensing agreements. The amount of the bond or financial assurance, net worth, and inspection and license fees will be determined by AMS in accordance with the licensing agreements applicable to the specific agricultural product, based upon the warehouses' total capacity for storing such product, that would require: ( 1 ) The largest bond or financial assurance;
( 2 ) The greatest amount of net worth; and
( 3 ) The greatest amount of fees.
Subpart 5128.1 - Bonds and Other Financial

Protections

Parent topic: Part 5128 - Bonds and Insurance

5128.101 Bid guarantees.

5128.101-1 Policy and use.

(c) The Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology) may authorize class

waivers at FAR 28.101-1. See Appendix GG for further delegation.

5128.105 Other types of bonds.

The head of the contracting activity may approve using other types of bonds in connection with

acquiring particular supplies or services. See Appendix GG for further delegation.

5128.106 Administration.

5128.106-2 Substitution of surety bonds.

(a) The head of the contracting activity may approve actions at FAR 28.106-2. See Appendix GG for

further delegation.

5128.106-6 Furnishing information.

(c) The Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology) shall make the

determination at FAR 28.106-6(c). See Appendix GG for further delegation.
#### § 774.7 [Reserved]
scl-ex1021_433.htm



Exhibit 10.21

 

FIRST AMENDMENT

 

to the 

 

STEPAN COMPANY 2011 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

 

Subject to certain inapplicable limitations, Section 5.9 of the Stepan Company 2011 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) provides that the Plan may be amended at any time by action of the Board of Directors of Stepan Company (the “Company”).  In accordance with the authority granted by Section 5.9 of the Plan and the approval provided by the Board of Directors of the Company, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

1.Effective as of January 1, 2018, Section 3.11(d) of the Plan is amended to read as follows:


	
 
	
“(d)
	
in the case of a Non-Qualified Stock Option or a Stock Appreciation Right, the date which is the last date of the next trading window after such termination if terminated for any reason other than by reason of his becoming Disabled (within the meaning of Code section 22(e)(3)), his death or his retirement under the provisions of any qualified retirement plan that may be maintained by the Company or subsidiary; or”




2.Effective as of January 1, 2018, Section 3.11(e) of the Plan is amended to read as follows:


	
 
	
“(e)
	
in the case of a Stock Award or Performance Grant, the date on which the Participant’s employment with the Company, including its subsidiaries, is terminated for any reason other than by reason of his becoming Disabled (within the meaning of Code section 22(e)(3)), his death or his retirement under the provisions of any qualified retirement plan that may be maintained by the Company or subsidiary.”




3.In all other respects, the Plan remains in full force and effect.

[Signature Page Follows]

 

CHICAGO/#3098949.1 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the changes made by this First Amendment shall be effective as of the applicable dates set forth above.

 


	
STEPAN COMPANY

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
By:
	
/s/ Gregory Servatius

	
Name:
	
 
	
Gregory Servatius

	
Title:
	
 
	
Vice President, Human Resources

	
Date:
	
 
	
February 21, 2018




 

CHICAGO/#3098949.1
****Bulletin No. 99-07, Supplement  5****
****OMB Home****

BULLETIN NO. 99-07, Supplement No. 5

TO THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND ESTABLISHMENTS

SUBJECT:  Apportionment Under the Extension of the Continuing Resolution for FiscalYear 2000

1.  **Purpose and background**.  H. J. Res. 80 extends the continuingresolution through November 18, 1999.

2.  **Apportionment**.  I am extending the automatic apportionmentspecified in section 2 of OMB Bulletin No. 99-07 to November 18, 1999.  The portion of the year covered is now 13.4percent.

If you can justify amounts greater than the amount automatically apportioned, please submita written request for apportionment.

**Jacob J. Lew***Director*

Privacy Statement
The BudgetLegislative InformationManagement Reform/GPRAGrants ManagementFinancial ManagementProcurement PolicyInformation & Regulatory Policy

Help

T H E   W H I T E   H O U S E
52.232-19 Availability of Funds for the Next Fiscal Year.       As prescribed in 32.706-1(b), insert the following clause:          Availability of Funds for the Next Fiscal Year (Apr 1984)          Funds are not presently available for performance under this contract beyond ________. The Government’s obligation for performance of this contract beyond that date is contingent upon the availability of appropriated funds from which payment for contract purposes can be made. No legal liability on the part of the Government for any payment may arise for performance under this contract beyond _____, until funds are made available to the Contracting Officer for performance and until the Contractor receives notice of availability, to be confirmed in writing by the Contracting Officer.          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.232 [Reserved]
§ 764.151 Farm Ownership loan uses. FO loan funds may only be used to: ( a ) Acquire or enlarge a farm or make a down payment on a farm;
( b ) Make capital improvements to a farm owned by the applicant, for construction, purchase or improvement of farm dwellings, service buildings or other facilities and improvements essential to the farming operation. In the case of leased property, the applicant must have a lease to ensure use of the improvement over its useful life or to ensure that the applicant receives compensation for any remaining economic life upon termination of the lease;
( c ) Promote soil and water conservation and protection;
( d ) Pay loan closing costs;
( e ) Refinance a bridge loan if the following conditions are met: ( 1 ) The applicant obtained the loan to be refinanced to purchase a farm after a direct FO was approved;
( 2 ) Direct FO funds were not available to fund the loan at the time of approval;
( 3 ) The loan to be refinanced is temporary financing; and
( 4 ) The loan was made by a commercial or cooperative lender.
#### § 905.130 Exemptions for pummelo.

The handling of pummelo fruit or pummelo hybrids shall be exempt from the provisions of §§ 905.7, 905.41, 905.70, 905.71, and the regulations issued thereunder: Provided, That, if the handler ships other fruit subject to Order requirements, the handler must comply with all sections of the Order applicable to such fruit, including handler registration.

[88 FR 14479, Mar. 9, 2023]