alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

May 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131372 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

MICHAEL COLTON, Personal Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, Representative of the Estate of Justices Alexis Hall, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 131372 

 COA: 268533 

St. Clair CC: 05-001942-NH 

DEVKUMAR S. NANDAMUDI, 

M.D., a/k/a DEVELOPMENT S.

NANDAMUDI, M.D., and 

CHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE 

OF PORT HURON,

 Defendants-Appellants, 

and 

PORT HURON HOSPITAL,

 Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

By order of October 17, 2007, the application for leave to appeal the April 28, 

2006 order of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in 

Braverman v Garden City Hospital (Docket Nos. 134445-6). On order of the Court, the 

case having been decided on April 9, 2008, 480 Mich 1159 (2008), the application is 

again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions 

presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l0519 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 27, 2008 

 Clerk
Exhibit 99.1
                                                                    ------------

                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE


            This Officer's Certificate is furnished pursuant to Section 4.10 of
that certain Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2006, among
BMW Financial Services NA, LLC, as Seller, Servicer, Administrator and
Custodian, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Indenture Trustee, BMW FS
Securities LLC, as Depositor, and the BMW Vehicle Owner Trust 2006-A as Issuer
(the "Sale and Servicing Agreement") (all capitalized terms used herein without
definition have the respective meanings specified in the Sale and Servicing
Agreement).

THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY CERTIFIES THAT:

            1.    I am a duly authorized officer of the Servicer;

            2.    I have reviewed the terms of the Sale and Servicing Agreement
            and I have made, or have caused to be made under my supervision, a
            detailed review of the transactions and conditions of the Servicer
            and the performance of its obligations there under during the period
            from September 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006;


            3.    To my knowledge, based on the review described in paragraph 2,
            the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Sale and
            Servicing Agreement, during the period from September 1, 2006 to
            December 31, 2006, except as set forth below.



            Described below are the exceptions, if any, to paragraph 3 by
listing, in detail, the nature of the condition or event, the period during
which it has existed and the action which the Servicer has taken, is taking, or
proposes to take with respect to each such condition or event: NONE


            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have affixed hereunto set my hand this 2nd day
of April, 2007.

      By:   BMW Financial Services NA, LLC

      By:   /s/ Kerstin Zerbst
            -------------------------------------------
            Kerstin Zerbst

      Title:   CFO
§ 789.30 Policy. ( a ) It is the policy of the Federal Government that the allocations authority under Title I of the Defense Production Act may: ( 1 ) Only be used when there is insufficient supply of a material, service, or facility to satisfy national defense supply requirements through the use of the priorities authority or when the use of the priorities authority would cause a severe and prolonged disruption in the supply of materials, services, or facilities available to support normal U.S. economic activities; and
( 2 ) Not be used to ration materials or services at the retail level.
( b ) Allocations orders, when used, will be distributed equitably among the suppliers of the materials, services, or facilities being allocated and not require any person to relinquish a disproportionate share of the civilian market.
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 30-2 Filed 11/22/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 30-2 Filed 11/22/2006 Page 2 of 2
Order filed August 10 , 2021

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 21

- 00141

- CV

____________ WLSC INCOPRO, LLC , Appellant

V.
ADMIRAL INSURANCE COMPANY , Appellee

On Appeal from the 152nd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial C o urt Cause No. 2017

- 24459



### ORDER

A ppellant is not represented by counsel in this appeal. Rather, appellant is attempting to represent itself pro se through a corporate officer who is not an attorney. Except for the performance of ministerial tasks, corpor a tions may appear and be represented only by a licensed attorney. Kunstoplast of Am., Inc. v. Formosa Plastics Corp., U.S.A. , 937 S.W.2d 455, 456 (Tex. 1996); see also Dell Dev. Corp. v. Best. Indus. Uniform Sup. Co. , 743 S.W.2d 302, 303 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 1987, writ denied).
According ly, we order appellant to retain counsel for this appeal and to provide proof of the retention on or before September 10, 2 021. A p pellant ’ scounsel will also need to file an amended notice of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.

25.1(g). If appellant does not comply, the court will dismiss the appeal on its own
motion f or failure to comply with our order. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1( b ) , 42. 3(c).

PER CURIAM

P anel Consists of Justices Jewell, Spain, and Wilson.
52.229-7 Taxes-Fixed-Price Contracts with Foreign Governments.       As prescribed in 29.402-1(b), insert the following clause:          Taxes-Fixed-Price Contracts with Foreign Governments (Feb 2013)                                       (a) 						            "Contract date," as used in this clause, means the date set for bid opening or, if this is a negotiated contract or a modification, the effective date of this contract or modification.                                          (b)                                                         (1) 								                The contract price, including the prices in any subcontracts under this contract, does not include any tax or duty that the Government of the United States and the Government of ______ [*insert name of the foreign government*] have agreed shall not apply to expenditures made by the United States in ______ [*insert name of country*], or any tax or duty not applicable to this contract or any subcontracts under this contract, pursuant to the laws of ______ [*insert name of country*]. If any such tax or duty has been included in the contract price, through error or otherwise, the contract price shall be correspondingly reduced.                                                            (2) 								                Taxes imposed under 26 U.S.C. 5000 C may not be included in the contract price.                                                                             (c) 						            If, after the contract date, the Government of the United States and the Government of ______ [*insert name of the foreign government*] agree that any tax or duty included in the contract price shall not apply to expenditures by the United States in ________ [*insert name of country*], the contract price shall be reduced accordingly.                                          (d) 						            No adjustment shall be made in the contract price under this clause unless the amount of the adjustment exceeds $250.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.229 [Reserved]
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2015229EN.01001601.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 3.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 229/16 |

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 830/2014 of 30 July 2014 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1890/2005, Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2/2012 and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 205/2013 as regards the product scope of the current anti-dumping measures concerning stainless steel fasteners and parts thereof, and as regards newcomer review requests, and providing for the possibility of repayment or remission of duties in certain cases

(
[Official Journal of the European Union L 228 of 31 July 2014](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2014_228_R_TOC)
)

On page 21, Article 2(a) and on page 22, Article 3, text of the footnote:

for:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(\*) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 830/2014 of 30 July 2014 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1890/2005, Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2/2012 and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 205/2013 as regards the product scope of the current anti-dumping measures concerning stainless steel fasteners and parts thereof, and as regards newcomer review requests, and providing for the possibility of repayment or remission of duties in certain cases ([OJ L 226, 31.7.2014, p. 16](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2014_226_R_TOC)).’, |

read:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(\*) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 830/2014 of 30 July 2014 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1890/2005, Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2/2012 and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 205/2013 as regards the product scope of the current anti-dumping measures concerning stainless steel fasteners and parts thereof, and as regards newcomer review requests, and providing for the possibility of repayment or remission of duties in certain cases ([OJ L 228, 31.7.2014, p. 16](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2014_228_R_TOC))’. |

---
#### § 906.16 District.

*District* means any of the geographic divisions of the production area initially established pursuant to § 906.20 or as re-established pursuant to § 906.21.
February 6 , 2014



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

KENNETH L. HILL , Appellant

NO. 14

- 13

- 00594

- CV V.

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONA L INSTITUTE DIVISION, MICHAEL EDISON AND S HAWN JOINER , Appellee s

________________________________ Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on June 29, 2013. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that all costs incurred by reas on of this appeal be paid by appellant, Kenneth L. Hill.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Anthony Jones, Appellant, v Brian Fischer, Respondent.

Submitted August 20, 2007;

decided October 16, 2007

Reported below, 2007 NY Slip Op 68924(U).

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
Motion Denied; Abatement Order filed July 12, 2016 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-16-00304-CR

____________

MICHAEL BELLE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 405th District Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 15CR0003

ABATEMENT ORDER

Appellant filed a pro se motion to extend time to file his brief in which he 

states he has not received a copy of the court reporter’s record. Appellant is not 

represented by counsel and this court is unaware whether appellant is entitled to 

appointment of an attorney. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(c)(2)(B). Accordingly, we deny 

appellant’s motion and enter the following order. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c).
We ORDER the judge of the 405th District Court to immediately conduct a 

hearing at which appellant, appellant’s counsel, if any, and counsel for the State shall 

participate, either in person or by video teleconference, to determine whether 

appellant desires to prosecute his appeal, and, if so, whether appellant is indigent 

and, thus entitled to appointed counsel on appeal. The judge may appoint appellate 

counsel for appellant if necessary. The judge shall see that a record of the hearing is 

made, shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law, and shall order the trial 

clerk to forward a record of the hearing and a supplemental clerk’s record containing 

the findings and conclusions. The transcribed record of the hearing, the court’s 

findings and conclusions, and a videotape or compact disc, if any, containing a 

recording of the video teleconference shall be filed with the clerk of this court within 

thirty days of the date of this order.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s 

active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the 

trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this court. The court will also 

consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the 

court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion. It is the responsibility of any party 

seeking reinstatement to request a hearing date from the trial court and to schedule 

a hearing in compliance with this court’s order. If the parties do not request a hearing, 

the court coordinator of the trial court shall set a hearing date and notify the parties 

of such date.

PER CURIAM
§ 764.232 Eligibility requirements. ( a ) The applicant: ( 1 ) Must comply with general eligibility requirements specified in § 764.101 except paragraphs (e) and (k) of that section;
( 2 ) And anyone who will sign the promissory note, must not have received debt forgiveness from the Agency on any direct or guaranteed loan; and
( 3 ) Must be the owner-operator or tenant-operator of a farm and be engaged in agricultural production after the time of loan is closed. In the case of an entity: ( i ) The entity is controlled by farmers engaged primarily and directly in farming in the United States;
( ii ) The entity must be authorized to operate a farm in the State in which the farm is located.
( b ) [Reserved]
52.215-3 Request for Information or

Solicitation for Planning Purposes.

As prescribed in 15.209(c), insert the following provision:

Request for Information or Solicitation for Planning Purposes (Oct 1997)

(a) The Government does not intend to award a contract on the basis of this solicitation or to

otherwise pay for the information solicited except as an allowable cost under other contracts as

provided in subsection 31.205-18, Bid and proposal costs, of the Federal Acquisition Regulation.

(b) Although "proposal" and "offeror" are used in this Request for Information, your response will be

treated as information only. It shall not be used as a proposal.

(c) This solicitation is issued for the purpose of: ___________________________ [state purpose].

(End of provision)

Parent topic: 52.215 [Reserved]
# 5130.202-6 Responsibilities.

(b) The Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology), on a non-delegable basis, shall make the authorization as described in FAR 30.202-6(b).  

**Parent topic:**5130.202 Disclosure requirements.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Brown, Appellant.

[814 NYS2d 542]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Latella, J.), rendered March 22, 2004, convicting him of burglary in the third degree, criminal trespass in the third degree, and harassment in the second degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish the “knowingly enters” element of the crimes of burglary in the third degree and criminal trespass in the third degree is unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Gray,*86 NY2d 10, 19 [1995]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of these crimes beyond a reasonable doubt. Resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the trier of fact, which saw and heard the witnesses *(see People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94 [1903]). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(see People v Garafolo,*44 *918AD2d 86, 88 [1974]). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see*CPL 470.15 [5]). Adams, J.P., Rivera, Skelos and Lifson, JJ., concur.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Authority:

7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 810.401 Definition of corn.

Grain that consists of 50 percent or more of whole kernels of shelled dent corn and/or shelled flint corn (*Zea mays* L.) and not more than 10.0 percent of other grains for which standards have been established under the United States Grain Standards Act.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Liberator, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Ronald P. Scott, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.





Date: October 12, 2011
/s/ Ronald P. ScottRonald P. ScottChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of Liberator, Inc.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

STINNETT GROUP, LLC., )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 1:06-cv-634-WKW

)

AUTO OWNERS INSURANCE, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

BRIEFING ORDER

Upon consideration of the Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant/Counterclaim

Plaintiff Owners Insurance Company, Incorrectly Named in the Complaint as Auto Owners

Insurance (Doc. # 9) filed on May 4, 2007, it is ORDERED that the motions be submitted

without oral argument on June 5, 2007.

It is further ORDERED that the plaintiff file responses which shall include a brief on

or before May 22, 2007. The defendant may file a reply brief on or before June 5, 2007.

For all future motions to remand, motions to dismiss, motions for judgment on the

pleadings, and motions for summary judgment filed in this case, it is ORDERED that:

l. The movant shall file its brief and any evidentiary submission simultaneously with

the filing of the dispositive motion.

2. The opponent’s response brief and any evidentiary submission shall be due 21 

days after the date the motion is filed.

Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 12 Filed 05/08/2007 Page 1 of 2
3. The movant’s reply brief, if any, shall be due 14 days after the date the

response is filed.

4. The motion shall be under submission on the due date of the reply brief. Unless 

the court determines that a hearing is necessary or helpful, at which time a date will be set, the

court will determine the motion without oral argument upon submission.

5. Briefs in support of or in opposition to any motion generally should not exceed

25 pages. In all cases in which briefs exceed 25 pages, counsel must include a table of contents

indicating the main sections of the brief, the principal arguments and citations to authority made

in each section, and the pages on which each section and any sub-sections may be found.

6. The parties are required to submit or mail a paper courtesy copy of briefs and

supporting evidence to the Chambers of the undersigned.

7. For those submissions (including briefs and evidentiary materials) that exceed 25

pages, the paper courtesy copy shall be bound in a three-ring binder and tabbed.

8. Any discussion of evidence in a brief must include the specific reference, by name

or document number and by page and line, to where the evidence can be found in the supporting

evidentiary submission or in any document filed with the court.

9. Failure to comply strictly with this Order for all future filings may result in the 

striking of the filing or other appropriate sanctions.

DONE this 8th day of May, 2007.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 12 Filed 05/08/2007 Page 2 of 2
53.000 Scope of part.       This part—                                       (a) 						            Prescribes standard forms (SF’s) and references optional forms (OF’s) and agency-prescribed forms for use in acquisition; and                                          (b) 						            Contains requirements and information generally applicable to the forms.    **Parent topic:** Part 53 - Forms
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Authority:

7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 868.204 Interpretive line samples.

Interpretive line samples showing the official scoring line for factors that are determined by visual examinations shall be maintained by the Federal Grain Inspection Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and shall be available for reference in all inspection offices that inspect and grade rice.

[42 FR 40869, Aug. 12, 1977; 42 FR 64356, Dec. 23, 1977, as amended at 47 FR 34516, Aug. 10, 1982. Redesignated at 54 FR 21403, May 18, 1989, and 60 FR 16364, Mar. 30, 1995]
§ 769.123 Transfer and assumption. ( a ) All transfers and assumptions must be approved in advance in writing by the Agency. The assuming entity must meet all eligibility criteria for the HFIL Loan Program.
( b ) Available transfer and assumption options to eligible intermediary lenders include the following: ( 1 ) The total indebtedness may be transferred to another eligible intermediary lender on the same terms; or
( 2 ) The total indebtedness may be transferred to another eligible intermediary lender on different terms not to exceed the term for which an initial loan can be made. The assuming entity must meet all eligibility criteria for the HFIL Loan Program.
( c ) The transferor must prepare the transfer document for the Agency review prior to the transfer and assumption.
( d ) The transferee must provide the Agency with information required in the application as specified in § 769.109.
( e ) The Agency prepared assumption agreement will contain the Agency case number of the transferor and transferee.
( f ) The transferee must complete an application as specified in § 769.109(a).
( g ) When the transferee makes a cash down-payment in connection with the transfer and assumption, any proceeds received by the transferor will be credited on the transferor's loan debt in order of maturity date.
( h ) The Administrator or designee will approve or decline all transfers and assumptions.