alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

§ 800.115 Who may request original services. ( a ) *General.* Any interested person may request original inspection and weighing services. The kinds of inspection and weighing services are described in § 800.75.
( b ) *Class Y weighing services.* A request for Class Y weighing services at an export elevator at an export port location shall cover all lots shipped or received in a specific type of carrier. At all other elevators, the request shall cover all lots shipped from or to a specific location in a specific type of carrier. Each request shall be for a contract period of at least 3 months, but a facility may, upon satisfactory notification, exempt specific unit trains from the request.
( c ) *Contract services.* Any interested person may enter into a contract with an agency or the Service whereby the agency or Service will provide original services for a specified period and the applicant will pay a specified fee.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0580-0012) [50 FR 45393, Oct. 31, 1985]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2745 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2745

          To suspend temporarily the duty on phosphinic acid, 
                        diethyl-, aluminum salt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 4, 2006

 Mr. Reed (for himself and Mr. Chafee) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on phosphinic acid, 
                        diethyl-, aluminum salt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PHOSPHINIC ACID, DIETHYL-, ALUMINUM SALT.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.09.02      Phosphinic acid,     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/    '
                        diethyl-, aluminum                                                  31/2009           '.
                        salt (CAS No.
                        225789-38-8)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        2931.00.90).......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 35.1**[CHASE LOGO]****SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**RE: Chase Mortgage Finance Trust (CMFT) 2006-S2: The Pooling and Servicing Agreement by and amongChase Mortgage Finance Co as Depositor, U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee, JPMorganChase Bank, NA as Custodian, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as Paying Agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank,N.A. as Servicer, (the “Agreement”)The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, asservicer (the “Servicer”) pursuant to the Chase Mortgage Finance Trust (CMFT) 2006-S2 (The“Agreement”), does hereby certify that:          (1) A review of the activities of the Servicer during the calendar year ending December 31,2006 and of the performance of the Servicer under the Agreement has been made under my supervision;and          (2) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such year.Date: 02/28/2007         JPMorgan Chase Bank,
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Beatrice Currie, Respondent, v. Medical Coaches, Inc., et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Cooke, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensa*595tion Board, filed December 12, 1967, which affirmed the Referee’s award of compensation benefits to Ralph Currie, since deceased, for permanent total disability found to be due to chronic pulmonary emphysema, an occupational disease. Decedent worked spraying paint and undercoating, painting by brush and sanding for Medical Coaches, Inc., builder of mobile medical units, covering a period of slightly more than a year prior to January 23, *1960*when he became sick, experiencing severe chest pains and considerable difficulty in breathing. The record contains evidence detailing the lack of ventilation and the presence of inordinate particles and fumes from paints and related volatile substances, as well as medical testimony that this last employment of said employee was the cause of the pulmonary emphysema. There is substantial evidence to support the board’s finding that Currie, by reason of his exposure to and inhalation of irritative paint fumes during the course of his work as a spray painter for Medical Coaches, Inc., contracted the occupational disease of pulmonary emphysema, permanently and totally disabling and causally related (cf. *Matter of Levine*v. *City of Syracuse,*29 A D 2d 584; *Matter of Nick*v. *Meyer Co.,*26 A D 2d 878; *Matter of Hayden*v. *M & R Linoleum & Carpet Co.,*24 A D 2d 788); and the selection of the opinion of said original claimant’s expert, over other medical opinion in the record, was an exercise of fact-finding power entirely within the province of the board, it not being this court’s function to decide which expert opinion is more weighty or persuasive *(Matter of Carrasquillo*v. *Santini Bros.,*13 N Y 2d 245, 248; *Matter of Palermo*v. *Gallucci & Sons,*5 N Y 2d 529, 532-533). Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Staley, Jr., and Cooke, JJ., concur in memorandum by Cooke, J.
#### § 58.16 Disposition of samples.

Any sample of product used for inspection or grading may be returned to the applicant at his request and at his expense if such request was made at the time of the application for the service. In the event the aforesaid request was not made at the time of application for the service, the sample of product may be destroyed, disposed of to a charitable organization, or disposed of by any other method prescribed by the Administrator.
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 6 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 6 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 6 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 6 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 4 of 4
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Outdoor ChannelHoldings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter endedSeptember 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, William A. Owen, Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ William A. Owen     |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| **William A. Owen**     |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| February 12, 2007       |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Outdoor Channel Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by OutdoorChannel Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6253

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ANAND LAKHRAM,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CR-97-88-BR, CA-98-174-7-BR)

Submitted: May 13, 1999 Decided: May 19, 1999

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anand Lakhram, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver, Assistant

United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Anand Lakhram seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See United States v. Lakhram, Nos. CR-97-88-

BR; CA-98-174-7-BR (E.D.N.C. Jan. 27, 1999). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 302

AN ACT

To make improvements in the Foundation for the National

Institutes of Health.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Foundation for the

5 National Institutes of Health Improvement Act’’.
 †

2

S 302 ES

1 SEC. 2. NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH ESTABLISH2 MENT AND DUTIES.

3 Section 499 of the Public Health Service Act (42

4 U.S.C. 290b) is amended—

5 (1) in subsection (d)—

6 (A) in paragraph (1)—

7 (i) by amending subparagraph (D)(ii)

8 to read as follows:

9 ‘‘(ii) Upon the appointment of the ap10 pointed members of the Board under clause

11 (i)(II), the terms of service as members of the

12 Board of the ex officio members of the Board

13 described in clauses (i) and (ii) of subparagraph

14 (B) shall terminate. The ex officio members of

15 the Board described in clauses (iii) and (iv) of

16 subparagraph (B) shall continue to serve as ex

17 officio members of the Board.’’; and

18 (ii) in subparagraph (G), by inserting

19 ‘‘appointed’’ after ‘‘that the number of’’;

20 (B) by amending paragraph (3)(B) to read

21 as follows:

22 ‘‘(B) Any vacancy in the membership of

23 the appointed members of the Board shall be

24 filled in accordance with the bylaws of the

25 Foundation established in accordance with

26 paragraph (6), and shall not affect the power of
†

3

S 302 ES

1 the remaining appointed members to execute

2 the duties of the Board.’’; and

3 (C) in paragraph (5), by inserting ‘‘ap4 pointed’’ after ‘‘majority of the’’;

5 (2) in subsection (j)—

6 (A) in paragraph (2), by striking

7 ‘‘(d)(2)(B)(i)(II)’’ and inserting ‘‘(d)(6)’’;

8 (B) in paragraph (4)—

9 (i) in subparagraph (A), by inserting

10 ‘‘, including an accounting of the use of

11 amounts transferred under subsection (l)’’

12 before the period at the end; and

13 (ii) by striking subparagraph (C) and

14 inserting the following:

15 ‘‘(C) The Foundation shall make copies of

16 each report submitted under subparagraph (A)

17 available—

18 ‘‘(i) for public inspection, and shall

19 upon request provide a copy of the report

20 to any individual for a charge that shall

21 not exceed the cost of providing the copy;

22 and

23 ‘‘(ii) to the appropriate committees of

24 Congress.’’; and
†

4

S 302 ES

1 (C) in paragraph (10), by striking ‘‘of

2 Health.’’ and inserting ‘‘of Health and the Na3 tional Institutes of Health may accept transfers

4 of funds from the Foundation.’’; and

5 (3) by striking subsection (l) and inserting the

6 following:

7 ‘‘(l) FUNDING.—From amounts appropriated to the

8 National Institutes of Health, for each fiscal year, the Di9 rector of NIH shall transfer not less than $500,000 and

10 not more than $1,250,000 to the Foundation.’’.

Passed the Senate July 27, 2005.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 302

AN ACT

To make improvements in the Foundation for the

National Institutes of Health.
#### Francois D. Jeune et al., Appellants, v O.T. Trans Mix Corp. et al., Respondents.

[815 NYS2d 182]

In an action to recover damages for wrongful death, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruchelsman, J.), dated January 5, 2005, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

*636Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.

By decision and order dated August 25, 2003 this Court reversed a judgment of the Supreme Court which, upon granting the plaintiffs’ motion for judgment as a matter of law on the issue of liability, and upon a jury verdict awarding damages to the plaintiffs, was in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendants *(see Jeune v O.T. Trans Mix Corp.,*307 AD2d 1027 [2003]). Accordingly, this Court granted a new trial on the issues of liability and damages for past pain and suffering.

At the time of the trial, the defendants’ time to move for summary judgment had expired *(see*CPLR 3212 [a]; *Brill v City of New York,*2 NY3d 648 [2004]). This Court’s decision and order dated August 25, 2003 did not constitute an extension of the time in which to make a motion for summary judgment *(see*CPLR 3212 [a]).

In any event, even if we were to reach the merits, we would deny the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. The plaintiff, a pedestrian, allegedly was struck by a truck owned by the defendant corporation necessitating the amputation of a leg. In this context, the defendants’ proof, consisting solely of an attorney’s affirmation suggesting that the plaintiffs’ case on liability may not be capable of proof, was conclusory and speculative. As such, it was insufficient to meet the defendants’ initial burden on a motion for summary judgment *(see Stahl v Stralberg,*287 AD2d 613 [2001]; *Rentz v Modell, 262*AD2d 545 [1999]). The record is devoid of any proof by a person possessed of knowledge which would establish either the absence of any possible negligence of the moving defendants or placing total responsibility for the incident on the deceased plaintiff. Ritter, J.P., Luciano, Fisher and Lifson, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James J. Donley, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s application to withdraw granted, there being compliance with *People v Crawford*(71 AD2d 38). (Appeal from judgment of Ontario County Court—burglary, third degree, and other charges.) Present—Simons, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Doerr, Witmer and Moule, JJ.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2883 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Phenmedipham. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 19, 2006 

Mr. BURR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Phenmedipham. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PHENMEDIPHAM. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.13.76 3- 

Methylcarbonylaminophenyl3-methyl-carbanilate 

(Phenmedipham) (CAS No. 

13684–63–4) in bulk or 

mixed with application adjuvants (provided for in subheadings 2924.29.47 and 

3808.30.15) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•S 2883 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
F iled : October 7 , 20 1 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11

- 6535 ( 1:10

- cv
- 00203

- LO

- TRJ )

PIPER ANN ROUNTREE ,
Petitioner

– Appellant ,

v.
GENE JOHNSON, of the Dept. of Correction of the Commonwealth of Virginia , Respondent

– Appellee.

O R D E R

The C ourt amends its opinion filed October 5, 201 1 , as

follows:

On page 2 , second line of text

-- the word “ his ” is

corrected to read “ her .”

For the Court

– By Direction

/s/ Patricia S. Conno r Clerk**UNPUBLISHED**

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11** 
**- 6535** 

PIPER ANN ROUNTREE ,
Petitioner

– Appellant ,

v.
GENE JOHNSON, of the Dept. of Correction of the Commonwealth of Virginia , Respondent

– Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Liam O’Grady , District Judge. ( 1:10

- cv
- 00203

- LO

- TRJ )

Submitted : September 29, 2011 Decided: October 5, 2011

Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion

.

Piper Ann Rountree, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Mozley Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Pip er Ann Rountree seeks to appeal the district

court ’ s order denying relief on h er 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006)
petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice
or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2006)

. A certificate of appealability will not

issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a
constitutional right. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)

. When the
district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies
this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional
claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473,

484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38
(2003). When the district court deni es relief on procedural
grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive
procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a
debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack ,
529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independen tly reviewed the record

and conclude that Rountree has not made the requisite showing.
Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss
the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately prese nted in the materials3 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSE D
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2930 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on ink jet textile printing 

machinery. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 23, 2006 

Mr. CARPER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on ink jet 

textile printing machinery. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INK JET TEXTILE PRINTING MACHINERY. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.01.92 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 ink jet textile printing machinery) is amended by striking 

7 ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•S 2930 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

HAROLD KELLY MURPHY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-618-MEF

)

SOUTHERN ENERGY HOMES, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the defendant's Motion to Amend Internal Deadline in

Scheduling Order (Doc. #65) filed on December 10, 2007, it is hereby

ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED.

DONE this the 12th day of December, 2007.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 66 Filed 12/12/2007 Page 1 of 1
§ 760.821 Compliance with highly erodible land and wetland conservation. ( a ) The highly erodible land and wetland conservation provisions of part 12 of this title apply to the receipt of disaster assistance for 2005, 2006, and 2007 crop losses made available under this authority.
( b ) Eligible participants must be in compliance with the highly erodible land and wetland conservation compliance provisions for the year for which financial assistance is requested.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONS

 

I, Mark Mareske, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Logan County Bancshares, Inc.

 

2.             Based on myknowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.             Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this annual report;

 

4.             The registrant’sother certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

 

a)              designed such disclosure controls and proceduresto ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

b)             evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 daysprior to the filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

 

c)              presented in this annual report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and proceduresbased on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5.             The registrant’sother certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)              all significant deficiencies in thedesign or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to report, process, summarize and report financial dataand have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses ininternal controls; and

 

b)             any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls; and

 

6.             The registrant’sother certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whetherthere were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors thatcould significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our mostrecent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

 
| Date: | May 11, 2004 |   | /s/ Mark Mareske |   | Vice President & CFO |   |
|-------|--------------|--------|------------------|--------|--------------------------|--------|

 

----