alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 773.6 Eligibility requirements. Loan applicants must meet all of the following requirements to be eligible for a Special Apple Program Loan: ( a ) The loan applicant must be an apple producer;
( b ) The loan applicant must be a citizen of the United States or an alien lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residence under the Immigration and Nationalization Act. For a business entity applicant, the majority of the business entity must be owned by members meeting the citizenship test or, other entities that are domestically owned. Aliens must provide the appropriate Immigration and Naturalization Service forms to document their permanent residency;
( c ) The loan applicant and anyone who will execute the promissory note must possess the legal capacity to enter into contracts, including debt instruments;
( d ) At loan closing the loan applicant and anyone who will execute the promissory note must not be delinquent on any Federal debt, other than a debt under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986;
( e ) At loan closing the loan applicant and anyone who will execute the promissory note must not have any outstanding unpaid judgments obtained by the United States in any court. Such judgments do not include those filed as a result of action in the United States Tax Courts;
( f ) The loan applicant, in past or present dealings with the Agency, must not have provided the Agency with false information; and
( g ) The individual or business entity loan applicant and all entity members must have acceptable credit history demonstrated by debt repayment. A history of failure to repay past debts as they came due (including debts to the Internal Revenue Service) when the ability to repay was within their control will demonstrate unacceptable credit history. Unacceptable credit history will not include isolated instances of late payments which do not represent a pattern and were clearly beyond the applicant's control or lack of credit history.
**CERTIFICATION**
  **Ownit
        Mortgage Loan Trust, Series 2006-6**
  
 I,
        Elizabeth Folk, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Litton
        Loan
        Servicing LP, certify that:
 
 1.  I
        have
        reviewed the report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to
        be
        filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ownit
        Mortgage Loan Trust, Series 2006-6 (the “Exchange Act Periodic
        Reports”);
 
 2.  Based
        on
        my knowledge, the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, taken as a whole, do not
        contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
        fact
        necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
        which
        such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
        by
        this report;
 
 3.  Based
        on
        my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required
        to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included
        in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports;
 
 4.  I
        am
        responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based
        on
        my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer
        compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation
        AB,
        and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, the servicers
        have
        fulfilled their obligations under the pooling and servicing agreement in
        all
        material respects; and
 
 5.  All
        of
        the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
        securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance
        with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included
        in
        this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act
        Rules
        13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except
        as
        otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
        described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
        10-K.
 
 In
        giving
        the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided
        to me
        by the following unaffiliated parties: LaSalle Bank National Association
        (custodian) and LaSalle Bank National Association (trustee).





Date:  March
      29,
      2007




/s/
        Elizabeth Folk


Elizabeth
      Folk


Senior
      Vice President and


Chief
      Financial Officer


Litton
      Loan Servicing LP


(Senior
      Officer in charge of the servicing function
      of the servicer)
§ 760.650 Calculating SURE. ( a ) Subject to the provision of this subpart, SURE payments for crop losses in crop year 2008 and subsequent crop years will be calculated as the amount equal to 60 percent of the difference between: ( 1 ) The SURE guarantee, as specified in § 760.631, § 760.633 or § 760.634 of this subpart, and
( 2 ) The total farm revenue, as specified in § 760.635.
( b ) In addition to the other provisions of this subpart and subpart B of this part, SURE payments may be adjusted downward as necessary to insure compliance with the payment limitations in subpart B and to insure that payments do not exceed the maximum amount specified in § 760.108(a)(1) or (b)(1) or otherwise exceed the perceived intent of 19 U.S.C. 2497(j). Such adjustments can include, but are not limited to, adjustments to insure that there is no duplication of benefits as specified in § 760.108(c).
§ 769.159 Processing loan applications. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 65062 , Aug. 8, 2024.
( a ) *Application dates.* The opening and closing dates for the HPRP applications submission will be announced in Federal Register.
( b ) *Intermediary loan application review.* After the closing date, the Agency will review applications from intermediaries for compliance with the provisions of this subpart.
( c ) *Loan approval.* Loan approval is subject to the availability of funds. The loan will be considered approved for the intermediary on the date the Agency signs the obligation of funds confirmation.
( d ) *Preferences for loan funding.* The Agency will fund eligible applications from intermediaries: ( 1 ) First, to those with not less than 10 years' experience serving socially disadvantaged farmers and ranchers that are located in states that have adopted a statute consisting of an enactment or adoption of the Uniform Partition of Heirs Property Act, as approved and recommended for enactment in all States by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws in 2010, that relend to owners of heirs property (as defined by the Uniform Partition of Heirs Property Act);
( 2 ) Second, to those that have applications from ultimate recipients already in process, or that have a history of successfully relending previous HPRP funds; and
( 3 ) Multiple applications in the same priority tier, will be processed based by date of application received; and
( 4 ) Any remaining applications, after priority tiers 1 and 2 have be funded, will be funded in order of the date the application was received.
( e ) *Current information required.* Information supplied by the intermediary in the loan application must be updated by the intermediary if the information is more than 90 days old at the time of loan closing.
19–008

107TH CONGRESS REPORT " HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ! 2d Session 107–737

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE CONFERENCE 

REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 5010, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2003

OCTOBER 10 (legislative day, OCTOBER 9), 2002.—Referred to the House Calendar 

and ordered to be printed 

Mrs. MYRICK, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 579]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 579, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives all points of order against the conference 

report to accompany H.R. 5010, the Department of Defense Appropriations Act for fiscal year 2003, and against its consideration. 

The resolution further provides that the conference report shall be 

considered as read.

Æ
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

In connection with the foregoing Annual Report on Form 10-K to be filed with
the Washington, D.C. Office of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, we hereby consent to the inclusion of our report dated May 28, 2009 related to the audit of the financial statements of IPtimize, Inc. as of and for the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006.



|                 |  |  |  |                                      
|---------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Denver, Colorado |  |  |  | /s/ Stark Winter Schenkein & CO., LLP

May 29, 2009
§ 60.105 Covered commodity. ( a ) *Covered commodity* means: ( 1 ) - ( 2 ) [Reserved]
( 3 ) Farm-raised fish and shellfish (including fillets, steaks, nuggets, and any other flesh);
( 4 ) Wild fish and shellfish (including fillets, steaks, nuggets, and any other flesh);
( 5 ) - ( 6 ) [Reserved]
( b ) Covered commodities are excluded from this part if the commodity is an ingredient in a processed food item as defined in § 60.119.
#### In the Matter of Riverkeeper, Inc., Respondent, v Planning Board of Town of Southeast et al., Appellants. In the Matter of Richard Feuerman et al., Respondents, v Planning Board of Town of Southeast et al., Appellants. In the Matter of Croton Watershed Clean Water Coalition, Inc., et al., Respondents, v Planning Board of Town of Southeast et al., Appellants.

(Proceeding No. 1.)

(Proceeding No. 2.)

(Proceeding No. 3.)

Submitted September 4, 2007;

decided September 6, 2007

Reported below, 32 AD3d 431.

Motion by Building and Realty Institute of Westchester & The Mid-Hudson Region for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted. Two copies of the brief must be served and 24 copies filed within seven days.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel, December 14, 2010, 8 a.m. to December 14, 2010, 2 p.m., Doubletree Hotel Bethesda (Formerly Holiday Inn Select), 8120 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on November 17, 2010, FR2010-28981.                

The meeting location changed from Doubletree Hotel Bethesda to Hyatt Regency Bethesda, 7400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814. The meeting is closed to the public. 

Dated: December 2, 2010.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-30816 Filed 12-7-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
242.7302 Requirements.

(a)(1) An in-depth CIPR as described at DFARS 242.7301 (a)(1) shall be conducted only when—

(i) A contractor has $50 million of qualifying sales to the Government during the contractor’s

preceding fiscal year; and

(ii) The ACO, with advice from DCMA insurance/pension specialists and DCAA auditors, determines

a CIPR is needed based on a risk assessment of the contractor’s past experience and current

vulnerability.

(2) Qualifying sales are sales for which certified cost or pricing data were required under 10 U.S.C.

3702, as implemented in FAR 15.403, or that are contracts priced on other than a firm-fixed-price or

fixed-price with economic price adjustment basis. Sales include prime contracts, subcontracts, and

modifications to such contracts and subcontracts.

(b) A special CIPR that concentrates on specific areas of a contractor’s insurance programs, pension

plans, or other deferred compensation plans shall be performed for a contractor (including, but not

limited to, a contractor meeting the requirements in paragraph (a) of this section) when any of the

following circumstances exists, but only if the circumstance(s) may result in a material impact on

Government contract costs:

(1) Information or data reveals a deficiency in the contractor's insurance/pension program.

(2) The contractor proposes or implements changes in its insurance, pension, or deferred

compensation plans.

(3) The contractor is involved in a merger, acquisition, or divestiture.

(4) The Government needs to follow up on contractor implementation of prior CIPR

recommendations.

(c) The DCAA auditor shall use relevant findings and recommendations of previously performed

CIPRs in determining the scope of any audits of insurance and pension costs.

(d) When a Government organization believes that a review of the contractor’s insurance/pension

program should be performed, that organization should provide a recommendation for a review to

the ACO. If the ACO concurs, the review should be performed as part of an ACO-initiated special

CIPR or as part of a CIPR already scheduled for the near future.

Parent topic: Subpart 242.73 - CONTRACTOR INSURANCE/PENSION REVIEW
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 2:06-cr-169-WHA 

 )

WILMONT TIMOTHY BARNETT )

GOVERNMENT'S MOTION FOR DETENTION HEARING

Comes now the United States of America, by and through Leura G. Canary, United States

Attorney for the Middle District of Alabama, and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3142(e) and (f) moves for

a detention hearing for the above-captioned defendant.

1. Eligibility of Cases

This case is eligible for a detention order because this case involves:

Crime of violence (18 U.S.C. 3156)

 X Maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death

 X 10 + year drug offense

Felony, with two prior convictions in the above categories

 X Serious risk the defendant will flee

 Serious risk of obstruction of justice

Felony involving a minor victim

Felony involving possession possession or use of a firearm or other destructive

device (as defined by 18 U.S.C. 921) or any other dangerous weapon

Failure to register a sex offender (18 U.S.C 2250)

2. Reason For Detention

The Court should detain defendant because there are no conditions of release which will

reasonably assure:

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 23 Filed 02/21/2007 Page 1 of 2
 X Defendant's appearance as required

 X Safety of any other person and the community

3. Rebuttable Presumption

The United States will invoke the rebuttable presumption against defendant under Section

3142(e). The presumption applies because:

X Probable cause to believe defendant committed 10 + year drug offense or an offense

in which a firearm was used or carried under Section 924(c)

 Previous conviction for "eligible" offense committed while on pretrial bond

A period of five years has not elapsed from defendant's conviction or release from

imprisonment for the offense described above

4. Time For Detention Hearing

The United States requests the Court conduct the detention hearing:

At the initial appearance

 X After continuance of 3 days

The Government requests leave of Court to file a supplemental motion with additional

grounds or presumption for detention should this be necessary.

Respectfully submitted this the 21st day of February, 2007.

LEURA G. CANARY 

United States Attorney

s/A. Clark Morris

A. CLARK MORRIS

Assistant United States Attorney

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334)223-7280

Fax: (334)223-7135

E-mail: clark. morris@usdoj.gov

ASB-1613-N77A

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 23 Filed 02/21/2007 Page 2 of 2
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-83,166-01

EX PARTE HARRY JOSEPH COHEN, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1415350-A IN THE 180th DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of forgery and

sentenced to twelve months years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction. 

Applicant contends, and the trial court finds, the State notified Applicant of potentially

exculpatory information regarding the complainant in this case after Applicant had been convicted.

The trial court also concludes this evidence was impeachment evidence that was material, and it

could have made the difference between conviction and acquittal, and the trial court recommends
2

this Court grant relief pursuant to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963). 

Relief is granted. The judgment in Cause No. 1415350 in the 180th District Court of Harris

County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Harris County to

answer the charges as set out in the indictment. The trial court shall issue any necessary bench

warrant within 10 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Copies ofthis opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: September 16, 2015

Do not publish
Subpart 42.9 - Bankruptcy    **Parent topic:** Part 42 - Contract Administration and Audit Services42.900 Scope of subpart.       This subpart prescribes policies and procedures regarding actions to be taken when a contractor enters into proceedings relating to bankruptcy. It establishes a requirement for the contractor to notify the contracting officer upon filing a petition for bankruptcy. It further establishes minimum requirements for agencies to follow in the event of a contractor bankruptcy.42.901 General.       The contract administration office shall take prompt action to determine the potential impact of a contractor bankruptcy on the Government in order to protect the interests of the Government.42.902 Procedures.       (a) 						            When notified of bankruptcy proceedings, agencies shall, as a minimum-                                                         (1) 								                Furnish the notice of bankruptcy to legal counsel and other appropriate agency offices (*e.g.,* contracting, financial, property) and affected buying activities;                                                            (2) 								                Determine the amount of the Government’s potential claim against the contractor (in assessing this impact, identify and review any contracts that have not been closed out, including those physically completed or terminated);                                                            (3) 								                Take actions necessary to protect the Government’s financial interests and safeguard Government property; and                                                            (4) 								                Furnish pertinent contract information to the legal counsel representing the Government.                                                                             (b) 						            The contracting officer shall consult with legal counsel, whenever possible, prior to taking any action regarding the contractor’s bankruptcy proceedings.42.903 Solicitation provision and contract clause.       The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.242-13, Bankruptcy, in all solicitations and contracts exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold.
§ 765.302 Use and maintenance of the agreement for the use of proceeds. ( a ) The borrower and the Agency will execute an agreement for the use of proceeds.
( b ) The borrower must report any disposition of basic or normal income security to the Agency as specified in the agreement for the use of proceeds.
( c ) If a borrower wants to dispose of normal income security in a way different than provided by the agreement for the use of proceeds, the borrower must obtain the Agency's consent before the disposition unless all FLP payments planned on the agreement have been paid.
( d ) If the borrower sells normal income security to a purchaser not listed in the agreement for the use of proceeds, the borrower must immediately notify the Agency of what property has been sold and of the name and business address of the purchaser.
( e ) The borrower must provide the Agency with the necessary information to update the agreement for the use of proceeds.
( f ) Changes to the agreement on the use of proceeds will be recorded, dated and initialed by the borrower and the Agency.
[72 FR 63309, Nov. 8, 2007, as amended at 78 FR 65531, Nov. 1, 2013]
#### Frank De Francisco, Respondent, v. Charles R. Rinaldo, Appellant.

— Appeal unanimously dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: No appeal lies to this court from an order of the County Court to which an appeal has been taken from an order of a lower court *(Ellis*v. *Greco,*34 A D 2d 879; CPLR 5703, subd. [b]). If we were to pass on the merits of the appeal we would affirm the order. (Appeal from order of Onondaga County Court affirming order of Syracuse City Court denying motion for summary judgment in action on note.) Present — Goldman, P. J., Del Vecchio, Witmer, Gabrielli and Bastow, JJ.
sgmo-ex1013_620.htm



EXHIBIT 10.13

 



Sangamo BioSciences, Inc.

Point Richmond Tech Center

501 Canal Blvd., Suite A100

Richmond, CA 94804

510-970-6000 510-236-8951 (Fax)

August 16, 2010

Curt Herberts

 

Dear Curt:

It is my pleasure to offer you the following position at Sangamo BioSciences, Inc:


	
Title:
	
Director, Corporate Development





	
Reporting to:
	
David Ichikawa, Senior Vice President, Business Development





	
Salary:
	
$190,000 base pay per annum, (paid semi-monthly) and eligible for annual bonus commencing with the 2011 plan year





	
Starting Date:
	
On October 11, 2010





	
Stock Options:
	
35,000 shares, subject to the approval of the Board of Directors and rules of vesting schedule described in the Sangamo BioSciences, Inc. Stock Option Plan





	
Signing Bonus:
	
10,000 (to be repaid in full should you resign your position within 12 months)





	
Benefits:
	
A group medical plan is in place with Aetna. Your specific choice of options within the plan determines the employee contribution toward premiums. Other benefits include dental insurance, short-term and long­ term disability insurance, life insurance, a Section 125 flexible spending plan, a 401(k) retirement savings plan, employee stock purchase plan, 15 vacation days, 10 paid holidays and 10 sick days per year.




I know you are fully aware of the extraordinary effort required to build a first rate organization. I am confident that you will succeed in the tasks at hand. Please sign and date both copies of this employment offer letter to indicate your acceptance, and return one copy to us for our files.

Sincerely,

 

/s/ Edward Lanphier

 

Edward Lanphier

President and Chief Executive Officer


		
	
cc:personnel file

payroll
	
Accepted: /s/ Curt A. Herberts       08/19/10

Curt HerbertsDate




 



 

 

2.