alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

VFS LEASING CO., )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06cv638-SRW

)

G. F. KELLY, INC. d/b/a )

KELLY TRUCKING; and GUY KELLY, )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

In the scheduling order entered on this date, the parties have been given a deadline for

filing dispositive motions. Any motion for summary judgment is due on or before that

deadline. The schedule for submissions in support of and opposition to the motion will

proceed as set out in this Order. Absent a showing of good cause, the dispositive motion

deadline and the briefing deadlines will not be extended. The Uniform Scheduling Order

provides ample time for discovery, and the court generally does not consider failure to

conduct needed discovery or the schedules of counsel to be good cause for extending the

dispositive motion deadline or briefing schedule. Counsel are advised to plan accordingly.

It is ORDERED that:

1. The moving party shall file its brief and evidentiary submission simultaneously

with the motion for summary judgment.

2. The opponent's brief and responsive submission shall be filed not later than 21

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 11 Filed 11/03/2006 Page 1 of 2
days thereafter.

3. The movant's reply brief shall be filed not later than 11 calendar days after the date

on which the opponent's responsive submission was due. The movant may not include any

new evidentiary material with the reply brief without prior leave of court.

4. Briefs must contain a statement of facts including specific references to the record.

The court will not consider documents or parts of documents that have not been specifically

cited by page number. 

Upon conclusion of the submission schedule, the court will take the motion under

submission without oral argument. If the court determines that oral argument is necessary,

it will set a hearing date. 

DONE, this 3rd day of November, 2006.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 11 Filed 11/03/2006 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 33 (Friday, February 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7466-7467]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3099]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. IC09-912-001]


Commission Information Collection Activities (FERC-912 \1\), 
Supplemental Notice

February 3, 2010.
AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ FERC-912 (``Cogeneration and Small Power Production, PURPA 
Section 210(m) Regulations for Termination or Reinstatement of 
Obligation to Purchase or Sell;'' OMB Control No. 1902-0237) covers 
the reporting requirements in 18 CFR Part 292.

ACTION: Supplemental notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the requirements of section 3507 of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3507, the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission (Commission or FERC) has submitted the FERC-912 
\1\ to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review of the 
information collection requirements.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In response to the Commission's Notice in 
Docket No. IC09-912-001 requesting public comment (74 FR 63743, 12/4/
2009), FERC and OMB received one

[[Page 7467]]

comment. The comment addresses the FERC-912 and relates to a pending 
rulemaking in Docket No. RM09-23 (``Revisions to Form, Procedures, and 
Criteria for Certification of Qualifying Facility Status for a Small 
Power Production or Cogeneration Facility''). The comment was also 
submitted in Docket No. RM09-23 and will be addressed in Docket No. 
RM09-23.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Ellen Brown may be reached by telephone at 
(202) 502-8663, by fax at (202) 273-0873, and by e-mail at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9efbf2f2fbf0b0fcecf1e9f0def8fbecfdb0f9f1e8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ff9a93939a91d19d8d908891bf999a8d9cd1989089">[email protected]</span></a>.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-3099 Filed 2-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### TURCHIN v. MATHESON LEAD CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

July 31, 1914.)

New Trial (§ 68*)—Verdict Contrary to Evidence.

Where, in a negligence case, it appeared that the mechanical appliances for holding in place certain covers, of which complaint was made, were as secure as the convenient use of the covers permitted, and there was nothing other than mere conjecture to show that defendant did not properly maintain them, the court properly set aside a verdict for plaintiff and granted a new trial.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see New Trial, Cent. Dig. §§ 135-140; Dec. Dig. § 68.*]

Appeal from Special Term, Queens County.

Action by Nicholas Turchin against the Matheson Lead Company. Verdict for plaintiff, and, from an order granting a new trial, he appeals.

Affirmed.

Argued before BURR, THOMAS, CARR, RICH, and STAPLETON, JJ.

Nicholas Aleinkoff, of New York City, for appellant.

Edward P. Mowton, of New York City, for respondent.

*

For other cases see same topic & § number in Dec. *&*Am. Digs. 1907 to date, *&*Rep’r Indexes

*994PER CURIAM.

The mechanical appliances, for holding the covers as securely as their convenient use permitted were sufficient. The sole issue is whether the defendant did his duty in properly maintaining them. The rule “res ipsa loquitur” does not apply, for the sufficient reason that the covers were necessarily moveable, and the fact that one moved under the unmeasured driving power of a man slipping against it does not of itself show abnormal condition of the securing bolts. Nor is there evidence of omission of duty in maintaining the covers. The plaintiff’s argument is that the cover moved under the pressure applied, and that it would not have moved had the bolts been properly tightened; hence the screws were not properly set. The difficulty is that the pressure of the man slipping and falling is a quantity unmeasured and unknown. It may have been sufficient to open doors properly held. It must be considered that the covers were made to open and shut under a force consistent with work properly and lawfully done on the surface of the conveyor. The suddenly fallen man may have applied that force. The evidence leaves the question unanswered, save by unpermitted- conjecture.

The order should be affirmed, with costs to respondent.
47.305-5 Destination unknown.       (a)                                                         (1) 								                When destinations are unknown, solicitations shall be f.o.b. origin only.                                                            (2) 								                The contracting officer shall include in the contract file justifications for such solicitations.                                                                             (b)                                                         (1) 								                When the exact destination of the supplies to be acquired is not known, but the general location of the users can be reasonably established, the acquiring activity shall designate tentative destinations for the purpose of computing transportation costs, showing estimated quantities for each tentative destination.                                                            (2) 								                The contracting officer shall insert in solicitations the provision at 52.247-49, Destination Unknown, when destinations are tentative and only for the purpose of evaluating offers.                                                            (3) 								                If it is necessary to control subsequent shipping weights, the solicitation shall state that subsequent shipments shall be made in carloads or truckloads (see the clause at 52.247-59, F.o.b. Origin-Carload and Truckload Shipments).                                                                             (c)                                                         (1) 								                When exact destinations are not known and it is impracticable to establish tentative or general delivery places for the purpose of evaluating transportation costs, the contracting officer shall insert in solicitations the provision at 52.247-50, No Evaluation of Transportation Costs.                                                            (2) 								                The solicitation shall also state that the transportation costs of subsequent shipments must be controlled (see, for example, the clause at 52.247-61, F.o.b. Origin-Minimum Size of Shipments).    **Parent topic:** 47.305 Solicitation provisions, contract clauses, and transportation factors.
Case 2:06-cv-00649-WHA-WC Document 22 Filed 10/18/2006 Page 1 of 1
07/23/201 0 FR I 11.'1 2 FA X 0002/00 2
Mayor' s Offic e 814-437-167 0 Cit y Manager' s Offic e 814-437-1485 Financ e Depaittnen t 814-437-192 2 Communit y Service s E>epa]tmen t 814-437-143 0 Cit y o f Frankli n 43 0 TTiirLcent

h Stree t Franklin , Pennsylvani a1632 3 www.frankUnpa.go v Jul y 16 , 201 0 Community Developmen t Dep t 8l4^37-7g4 1 Fir e Departmen t Busines s 814-432-378 0 Emergenc y 814-437-291 1 Polic e Depanmcn t Busines s 814-437-164 4 Emerfienc y 814-437-291 1

Mr . Denni s J . D e Van

y Chief , Essentia l Ai r Servic e Division , X-5 3 Offic e of Aviatio n Analysi s U.S . Dept . of

Transportatio n . : 3 Dea r Mr . D c Vany : I a mwritin g t o expres s m

y stron g suppor

t o f th e Gulfstrea

mInt' l Airline s proposal . Optio n One , t o provid e schedule d air

servic e t o Franklin/Oi l Cit y (FKL) under

th e Essential Ai r

Servic e program . Th e Cily o f

Frankli n support s Gulfstream' s Optio n On e servic e throug h Clevelan d an d wil l wor k closel y wit

h th e Airpor

t an d Gulfstrea

mthroug h th e Sav e ou r

Servic e (SOS ) effor

t t o improv e passenger enplanements . Th e servic e offered usin g Clevelan d a s ahu b give s thi s communit y mor e no n sto p destination s an d reasonabl e connection s an d fares . Gulfstrea mha s prove n t o b e ver

y custome r consciou s and th e Continenta l Connection

/ Continenta

l bran d i s becomin g afavorit e i n thi s region . The Airport work s closel y wit

h th e publi c and th e ai r

carrie r o n communicatio n an d custome r servic e a s wel l a s providin g acos t

free-business environment fo r th e carrier . Thes e fact s wil l mak e th e SO S effor

t successful . Th e citizen s an d businesse s o f Frankli n an d th e entire Oi l Heritag e Regio n ar e i n nee d of

timely ^ dependabl e air

service . Meaningful , schedule d ai r servic e i s akey element

i n th e economi c viabilit

y o f thi s region . Ou

r rural are ashoul d b e allowe d t o compete wit h other area s o n aleve l playin g field. Viabl e commercia

l air servic e help s leve l tha

t playin g field and i s necessar y for busines s developmen

t an d sustaine d economi c growth . W e as k tha t you recommen d thi s proposal to the Deput y Secretary . O n behal f

o f th e Cit y o f Franklin , I thank you fo r you r wor k o n th e Essential Ai r

Servic e program . Sinflerely , ^^n n Witherup Ruaegeai r Witherup Deput y Mayor :egea)

r Q
EX-35 (a)
MASTR 2006-3

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)

Cenlar FSB

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Cenlar FSB, as servicer (the
"Servicer") pursuant to the applicable servicing agreement, does hereby certify
that:

1. A review of the Servicer's activities during the period from and including
January 1, 2006 through and including December 31, 2006 and of the
Servicer's performance under the applicable servicing agreement has been
made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all
material respects throughout such period. [If any material failure,specify such
failure and its nature and status.]

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 28th
day of February 2007.


By: /s/ Jeanne M. Bader
Name: Jeanne M. Bader
Title: Senior Vice President
Director of Loan Administration
# Subpart 243.1 - GENERAL

**Parent topic:**Part 243 - CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS

## 243.107 RESERVED

### 243.107-70 Notification of substantial impact on employment.

The Secretary of Defense is required to notify the Secretary of Labor if a modification of a major defense contract or subcontract will have a substantial impact on employment.  The clause prescribed at                 249.7003             (c) requires that the contractor notify its employees, its subcontractors, and State and local officials when a contract modification will have a substantial impact on employment.

## 243.170 Identification of foreign military sale (FMS) requirements.

Follow the procedures at PGI                 243.170              for identifying contract modifications that add FMS requirements.

## 243.171 Obligation or deobligation of funds.

Follow the procedures at PGI                 243.171              when obligating or deobligating funds.

## 243.172 Application of modifications.

Follow the procedures at                 204.1671              for determining the sequence for application of modifications to a contract or order.
#### § 900.13 Submission to Secretary.

Upon the expiration of the period allowed for filing exceptions or upon request of the Secretary, the hearing clerk shall transmit to the Secretary the record of the proceeding. Such record shall include: All motions and requests filed with the hearing clerk and rulings thereon; the certified transcript; any proposed findings or conclusions or written arguments or briefs that may have been filed; the Administrator's recommended decision, if any, and such exceptions as may have been filed.
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.5




Date


First Name Last Name
Street Address
City, State Zip Code


Re:  Board of Directors Stock Grant 


Dear [   ]:


We are pleased to provide you with a grant of shares of stock under the CME Group Inc.
(the “Company”) Director Stock Plan Amended and Restated Effective May 21, 2014 (the “Plan”) as compensation for your service as a member of the Board of Directors of the Company.  Your participation in the Plan will further align your interests with our shareholders.  This grant was made to you on [     ], using the closing stock price of $[    ].  Certain terms of your equity grant follow:


Number of
		
	Shares of Stock:
	[   ] shares of Class A common stock of CME Group Inc.




[Number of Additional
		
	Shares in Lieu of Cash Stipend:
	[   ] shares of Class A common stock of CME Group Inc.]1 




		
	Total Grant Value:
	$[    ]




By accepting this stock grant, you hereby agree to the terms and conditions of the Plan.
[Because you have elected to receive additional shares in lieu of all or some of the cash portion of your stipend, by accepting such additional shares, you hereby agree to repay the Company any unearned portion of your annual stipend that would otherwise have been payable in cash in the event you leave the Board prior to the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders.  The amount of the unearned stipend will be prorated on a monthly basis and will be due within 30 days of your resignation, if applicable. ]1 
Neither the grant of shares nor any other action taken pursuant to the Plan shall constitute or be evidence of any agreement or understanding, express or implied, that you have a right to continue to provide services as a director, of the Company for any period of time or at any specific rate of compensation.
CME Group Inc.


By:  
/s/ Hilda Harris Piell


Name:    Hilda Harris Piell
Title:     Sr. Managing Director & Chief Human Resources Officer


1 To be included for Directors electing to receive all or any portion of their cash stipend in additional shares.
Exhibit
      13.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Rodman International
      Enterprise III, Ltd. (the "Company") as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Arnold P. Kling, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Arnold P. KlingArnold
                P. Kling
              Principal
                Executive Officer
              June
                6, 2008
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

M IDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABA M A

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

 DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

 

August 16, 2006

NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT

RE: Betty J. Adams et al v. Pactiv Corporation et al

Civil Action No. 2:06cv00660-WKW

The above-styled case has been reassigned to District Judge Lyle E. Strom. 

Please note that the case number is now 2:06cv00660-LES. This new case

number should be used on all future correspondence and pleadings in this action.

Sincerely,

Sheryl K. Lent

Deputy Clerk

Case 2:06-cv-00660-LES-CSC Document 4 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3075 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3075

         To reduce temporarily the duty on Polyethylene HE1878.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

 Mr. Sessions introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To reduce temporarily the duty on Polyethylene HE1878.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. POLYETHYLENE HE1878.

    Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new heading:

``      9902.10.34      Polyethylene        3.6%         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         HE1878 (CAS No.                                                    31/2009
                         25087-34-7), with
                         l-butene as
                         comonomer
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         3901.20.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EX-4.39



 Exhibit 4.39 

Addendum No.1 dated 2nd April 2012 

to 
 the IT Agreement
dated 3rd April 2007 
 between 

CAPITAL SHIPMANAGEMENT CORP. of Panama (the “CSM”) 

and 
 CAPITAL PRODUCTS
PARTNERS L.P. of Marshall Islands (the “CPLP”) 
 NOW IT IS HEREBY MUTUALLY AGREED that: 

 

	1.	the term of the said IT Agreement dated 3rd April 2007 is renewed for another five (5) years namely from 3rd April, 2012 to 2nd April 2017. 


 

	2.	any relevant or applicable provision of the IT Agreement dated 3rd April 2007 is hereby amended accordingly. 


All other terms and conditions in the said IT Agreement dated 3rd April 2007 shall remain unaltered and
in full force. 
 CAPITAL SHIPMANAGEMENT CORP. 
 BY
ITS GENERAL PARTNER CAPITAL GP L.L.C., 
  

			
	By:	 	 /s/ Nikolaos Syntichakis

	Name:	 	
	Title:	 	

 CAPITAL PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P. 
  

			
	By:	 	 /s/ Ioannis E. Lazaridis

	Name:	 	
	Title:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Wells Mid-Horizon Value-Added Fund I, LLC (the Registrant) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Principal Executive Officer of Wells Investment Management Company, Inc., the manager of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Principal Financial Officer of
Wells Investment Management Company, Inc., the manager of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |                                                                                                                                   
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ LEO F. WELLS, III                                                                                                             
| |  | Leo F. Wells, III                                                                                                                 
| |  | Principal Executive Officer of Wells Investment Management Company, Inc., the manager of Wells Mid-Horizon Value-Added Fund I, LLC
| |  | March 18, 2010                                                                                                                    
| | 
| |  | /s/ DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS                                                                                                           
| |  | Douglas P. Williams                                                                                                               
| |  | Principal Financial Officer of Wells Investment Management Company, Inc., the manager of Wells Mid-Horizon Value-Added Fund I, LLC
| |  | March 18, 2010