alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
REGISTRANTS  UNAUDITED  CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE  SHEET  AS  OF  JUNE  30, 1999 AND
UNAUDITED  CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE 6 MONTHS THEN ENDED AND
IS  QUALIFIED  IN  ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO  SUCH  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       70901
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                             12912386
<ALLOWANCES>                                448024
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          23380797
<PP&E>                                    11305114
<DEPRECIATION>                              454635
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            37258908
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     18024166
<BONDS>                                   11566049
<COMMON>                                   8150000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (595561)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              37258908
<SALES>                                   43962131
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          43962131
<CGS>                                     34281063
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             34281063
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            691535
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            156156
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          794484
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             656687
<INCOME-TAX>                                332380
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         318263
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                318263
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .01


</TABLE>
|T H E   W H I T E   H O U S E

OMB Bulletin No. 98-09

Help

Text Only | T H E   W H I T E   H O U S E | OMB Bulletin No. 98-09 | Help

Text Only
|---------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------- | ---------------------- | ---------------
|T H E   W H I T E   H O U S E                                          | OMB Bulletin No. 98-09        | Help

Text Only       

|
|

|Change in Hours       | Change in Cost           | Type of Change    | Description of Change                                                                                                              | Change in Hours | Change in Cost | Type of Change | Description of Change
|--------------------- | ------------------------ | ----------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------- | -------------- | -------------- | ---------------------
|Title(s): U.S. Survey | OMB Number(s): 0000-0000
|                      | Total Burden Hours       | Total Cost Burden
|
|End of FY 1997        | 12,000,000               | 0                
|End of FY 1998        | 14,000,000               | 5,000,000        
|
|-                     | +$3,000,000              | Program           | Estimated previously unreported costs.                                                                                            
|+4,000,000            | +$2,000,000              | Program           | [Describe specific agency action, causes for action, and, if this page covers multiple OMB numbers, which OMB number is affected.]
|-3,000,000            | -                        | Program           | [Describe specific agency action, causes for action, and, if this page covers multiple OMB numbers, which OMB number is affected.]
|+1,000,000            | -                        | Adjustment        | Increase in eligible recipients for aid from 25,000,000 to 26,000,000.                                                            
|Title(s): U.S. Survey | OMB Number(s): 0000-0000
|                      | Total Burden Hours       | Total Cost Burden
|
|End of FY 1998        | 12,000,000               | 0                
|End of FY 1999        | 14,000,000               | 5,000,000        
|
|-                     | +$3,000,000              | Program           | Estimated previously unreported costs.                                                                                            
|+4,000,000            | +$2,000,000              | Program           | [Describe specific agency action, causes for action, and, if this page covers multiple OMB numbers, which OMB number is affected.]
|-3,000,000            | -                        | Program           | [Describe specific agency action, causes for action, and, if this page covers multiple OMB numbers, which OMB number is affected.]
|+1,000,000            | -                        | Adjustment        | Increase in eligible recipients for aid from 25,000,000 to 26,000,000.
§ 82.8 Application and approval for participation. ( a ) Applications will be reviewed for program compliance and approved or disapproved by CCPA office personnel.
( b ) Applications for participation in the Clingstone Peach Diversion Program can be obtained from the CCPA office at 2300 River Plaza Drive, Suite 110, Sacramento, CA 95833; Telephone: (916) 925-9131; Fax: (916) 925-9030; at 335 Teegarden Avenue, Suite A, Yuba City, CA 95991; Telephone: (530) 673-8526; Fax: (530) 673-2673; or at 1704 Herndon Road, Ceres, CA 95307; Telephone: (209) 537-0715; Fax: (209) 537-1043.
( c ) Any grower desiring to participate in the Clingstone Peach Diversion Program must file an application with the CCPA prior to November 30, 2005. The application shall be accompanied by a copy of any two of the following four documents: Plot Map from the County Hall of Records; Irrigation Tax Bill; County Property Tax Bill; or any other documents containing an Assessor's Parcel Number. Such application shall include at least the following information: ( 1 ) The name, address, telephone number, and tax identification number or social security number of the grower;
( 2 ) The location and amount of acreage to be diverted;
( 3 ) The 2005 clingstone peach production from the acreage to be diverted;
( 4 ) If the land with respect to which the clingstone peach trees will be destroyed is subject to a mortgage, statutory lien, or other equity interest, the grower must obtain from the holder of such interest a written statement that such party agrees to the enrollment of such land in this program to the extent determined necessary by AMS. Obtaining such assent shall be the responsibility of the applicant who shall alone bear any responsibilities which may extend to such third parties;
( 5 ) A statement that the applicant agrees to comply with all of the regulations established for the clingstone peach diversion program;
( 6 ) The applicant shall sign the application certifying that the information contained in the application is true and correct;
( 7 ) The year that the clingstone peach acreage to be diverted was planted;
( 8 ) The names of the processors who received the clingstone peaches from the grower in 2005.
( d ) After the CCPA receives the applications, it shall review them to determine whether all the required information has been provided and that the information is correct.
( e ) If the deliveries off the acreage to be removed in such applications, multiplied by $100 per ton (for actual 2005 deliveries on these acres, but within the constraints of a minimum payment of $500 per acre and a maximum payment of $1,700 per acre), exceed the amount of funds available for the diversion program, each grower's application will be considered in the order in which they are received at the CCPA offices.
( f ) After the application reviews and confirmation of eligible trees are completed, the CCPA shall notify the applicant, in writing, as to whether or not the application has been approved and the tonnage approved for payment after removal. If an application is not approved, the notification shall specify the reason(s) for disapproval.
5609.901 Guidance.

(Revised March 2009)

Contractors in the Federal workplace are an integral part of the USSOCOM team. However, they are

not Government employees; therefore, guidance is provided in the DCG for USSOCOM staffs that

utilize contractors in the workplace.

HQ, United States Special Operations CommandSpecial Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology,

and Logistics (SOF AT&L-K)

SOFARS 5609

February 2007

Parent topic: Subpart 5609.9 - CONTRACTORS IN THE FEDERAL WORKPLACE (formerly

Contractor Employee Training)
#### § 769.124 Appeals.

Any appealable adverse decision made by the Agency may be appealed upon written request of the intermediary as specified in 7 CFR part 11.
Editorial Note on Part 869
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 869 appear at 84 FR 45646, Aug. 30, 2019.

§ 869.7 Return of suspended or revoked certificates of licensing or certificates of authorization. ( a ) When a license issued to a warehouse operator or service license ends or is suspended or revoked by AMS, such certificates of licensing and applicable licensing agreement and certificates of authorization must be immediately surrendered and returned to AMS.
( b ) When an agreement with a provider ends or is suspended or revoked by AMS, such certificates of authorization and applicable provider agreement must be immediately surrendered to AMS
§ 870.1 Applicability. ( a ) These regulations specify the terms and conditions under which the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) will make payments to eligible domestic users who have entered into an Upland Cotton Domestic User Agreement with the Agricultural Marketing Service to participate in the Economic Adjustment Assistance for Textile Mills Program.
( b ) The Agricultural Marketing Service will specify the forms to be used in administering the Economic Adjustment Assistance for Textile Mills program.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA OF

NORTHERN DIVISION

FRANK BLAIR, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-651-MEF

)

AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, )

et al., )

)

Defendants. )

O R D E R

The court has been notified by the parties that the dispute in the above-referenced case

has been resolved. Accordingly, it is hereby 

ORDERED that the parties file a joint stipulation of dismissal on or before February

1, 2008.

DONE this the 2nd day of January, 2008.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00651-MEF-SRW Document 21 Filed 01/02/2008 Page 1 of 1
§ 632.51 Accord with environmental laws and orders. ( a ) A final program EIS is available in compliance with section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). This statement discloses the cumulative program impacts that significantly affect the quality of the human environment.
( b ) The program is to be conducted in accordance with other laws and Executive orders concerning environmental protection.
( c ) Channelization of streams is prohibited under this program. Channelization as used herein means the overall widening, deepening, realining, or constructing a nonvegetative protective lining over all or part of the perimeter of a perennial stream channel as described in NRCS Channel Modification Guidelines, Part B, Items 4, 5, 6, and 7, as published in the Federal Register on March 1, 1978 (43 FR 8278).
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into the previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-150968) of MSB Financial Corp. (the “Company”) of our report dated September 25, 2008, on the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2008 and 2007, and for each of the years then ended, as included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2008.

 

/s/ Beard Miller Company LLP

 

Clark, New Jersey

September 29, 2008
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7035

FRANKIE L. MCCOY, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden; UNKNOWN NAMED

DEFENDANTS-STAFF; CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICE, INCORPORATED; ARESAHEGN GETACHEW, Dr.,

Medical Director; C. SANDERS, Administrative

Nurse; A. M. ROACH, Ms., Duty Nurse; L.

CONTEE, Ms.; MS. LINDSEY; K. O. JOHNSON, Mr.;

MR. ISICK; ALL MEDICATION-TECH NURSES; UNKNOWN

NAMED DEFENDANTS, each defendant named is sued

within their individual capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-97-

1663-L)

Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: November 30, 1998

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Frankie L. McCoy, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,

Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney

General, Baltimore, Maryland; Philip Melton Andrews, Severn Eyre

Savage Miller, KRAMON & GRAHAM, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. McCoy v. Corcoran, No. CA-97-1663-L (D. Md. July 1,

1998). We deny Appellant’s motions for appointment of counsel and

to extend the time in which to file a reply brief. We also deny

Appellant’s motion for oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Centenary International Corporation
      (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Hector A. Patron Costas, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
      belief:





(1)  the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/
              Hector A. Patron CostasHector A. Patron CostasChief Executive OfficerNovember 10,
              2006


A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing
      certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-QSB solely pursuant to
      section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and are not being
      filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure
      document.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 294 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 294

To strengthen the restrictions of the importation from BSE minimal-risk 
 regions of meat, meat byproducts, and meat food products from bovines.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 3, 2005

Mr. Burns (for himself, Mr. Nelson of Nebraska, Mr. Thune, Mr. Thomas, 
Mr. Hagel, Mr. Roberts, and Mr. Baucus) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, 
                        Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To strengthen the restrictions of the importation from BSE minimal-risk 
 regions of meat, meat byproducts, and meat food products from bovines.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RESTRICTIONS ON IMPORTATION FROM BSE MINIMAL-RISK REGIONS OF 
              MEAT AND ELIGIBLE PRODUCTS FROM RUMINANTS.

    (a) In General.--Subject to subsection (b), paragraph (a) of 
section 94.19 of title 9, Code of Federal Regulations, as amended by 
the final rule issued by the Secretary of Agriculture on January 4, 
2005 (70 Fed. Reg. 551) (and any successor regulations), shall apply 
only to meat, meat byproducts, and meat food products derived from a 
bovine that is slaughtered at less than 30 months of age.
    (b) Expanded Coverage.--If the Secretary, in consultation with 
appropriate officials in the minimal risk region described in section 
94.18(a)(3) of such title 9, makes a determination that the region is 
in full compliance with a ruminant feed ban and other safeguards 
related to bovine spongiform encephalopathy, the Secretary--
            (1) shall submit to the Committee on Agriculture of the 
        House of Representatives and the Committee on Agriculture, 
        Nutrition, and Forestry of the Senate a report on the 
        determination; and
            (2) may promulgate regulations to allow paragraph 9(a) of 
        section 94.19 of such title 9 to apply to meat, meat 
        byproducts, and meat food products derived from a class of 
        bovines in the region that is determined by the Secretary by 
        the regulations.
                                 <all>
```
§ 52.3752 Types of canned ripe olives. Canned ripe olives are processed as two distinct types. Unless a specific type is stated in this subpart, “canned ripe olives” refers to olives of either “ripe-type” or “green-ripe type.” ( a ) *Ripe type.* “Ripe type” olives are those which have been treated and oxidized in processing to produce a typical dark brown to black color.
( b ) *Green-ripe type.* “Green-ripe type” olives are those which have not been oxidized in processing; which range in color from yellow-green; green-yellow or other greenish casts; and which may be mottled.
Subpart 5202.1 - DEFINITIONS     **Parent topic:** Part 5202 - DEFINITIONS OF WORDS AND TERMSDefinitions.    “Acquisition Category” or ACAT is a defense acquisition program designation. For the purposes of NMCARS, this designation also includes “Business System Category” (BCAT) as defined in DoD Instruction 5000.75.       “ASN(RDA) Website” is defined as https://www.secnav.navy.mil/rda/DASN-P and all accompanying pages within the site where DON contracting policy is posted.       “Clause” is defined as language which imposes a duty on the Government or contractor and is not directly related to the production or performance of a contract deliverable as depicted in Figure 1, Contract Language Criteria.                     “CCO" is the “Chief of the Contracting Office”. The CCO is the official who has overall responsibility for managing the day-to-day contracting office operations and includes the principal deputy to such official.       “DASN(P)” is the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Procurement, Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Research, Development, and Acquisition). It also includes the Executive Director, DASN(P), and the Navy Senior Services Manager (SSM).       “Deputy/Assistant Commander for Contracts” is the Deputy or Assistant Commander for Contracts or the equivalent at a Systems Command, the Headquarters, NAVFACENGCOM; Deputy Commandant for HQMC, I&L; ONR; MSC; and SSP. It also includes the principal deputy for these officials.       “NAE” is the Navy Acquisition Executive. ASN(RDA) is the NAE.       “Navy” or "DON" is the Department of Navy including the Marine Corps, unless otherwise specified.       “NSPE” is Navy Senior Procurement Executive. ASN(RDA) is the NSPE.       “Provision” is defined as language necessary for a potential offeror to produce a conforming proposal in response to a solicitation.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Robert Licht, Appellant, v Village of Hastings-on-Hudson et al., Respondents. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed October 31, 1979, which disallowed a claim for compensation *733under the Volunteer Fireman’s Benefit Law. Claimant was a volunteer fireman who injured his right arm and pelvis on August 25, 1978 when he fell from a roof while trying to retrieve a ball. At the time of his accident, claimant was attending an annual swim for all of the companies of the Village of Hastings-on-Hudson Fire Department. The board disallowed claimant’s claim on the basis that the injury did not occur in the line of firemanic duties. The board’s decision must be affirmed. Volunteer firemen are ineligible for benefits covering injuries sustained during recreational or social activities involving their fire company or department (Volunteer Fireman’s Benefit Law, § 5, subd 2, par b). The function which claimant was attending v/hen he was injured, although sponsored by the village fire department, was purely social in nature and designed to boost department morale. No firemanic training of any sort took place and attendance was voluntary. Accordingly, there is substantial evidence in the record to support the board’s decision. Decision affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Kane and Herlihy, JJ., concur.