alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

*Time and Date:*                     9 a.m.-5 p.m. EST, Wednesday, December 15, 2010.                

*Location:*                     Washington Plaza Hotel, 10 Thomas Circle, NW., Washington, DC 20005.                

*Status:*                     Open to the public, on a first come, first served basis, limited by the space available. An opportunity for the public to listen to the meeting by phone will be available. For information on observing the meeting in person or by phone, see “contact for additional information” below.                

*Purpose:*                     This is the seventh meeting of the National Conversation on Public Health and Chemical Exposures Leadership Council, which is convened by RESOLVE, a non-profit independent facilitator. The National Conversation on Public Health and Chemical Exposures is a collaborative initiative supported by NCEH/ATSDR and through which many organizations and individuals are helping develop an action agenda for strengthening the Nation's approach to protecting the public's health from harmful chemical exposures. The Leadership Council provides overall guidance to the National Conversation project and is responsible for issuing the final action agenda. For additional information on the National Conversation on Public Health and Chemical Exposures, visit this Web site:                     *http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/​nationalconversation/​*.                

*Meeting agenda:*                     The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the draft action agenda.                

*Contact for additional information:*                     If you would like to receive additional information on attending this meeting in person or listening by telephone, please                           ( print page 75475)                        contact:                     *nationalconversation@cdc.gov*                     or Julie Fishman at 770-488-0629.                

Tanja Popovic,

Deputy Associate Director for Science, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2010-30165 Filed 12-2-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
# 52.245-8 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**52.245 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                         547,677
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               547,677
<PP&E>                                       7,271,480
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,871,516
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,947,641
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          125,413
<BONDS>                                        685,989
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,136,239<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,947,641
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               246,790
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  216,354
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,355
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,081
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.30<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Refers to General Partner's and Limited Partner's Capital
<F2>97% Limited Partners - Interest Outstanding = 9004.15
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
215.406-1 Prenegotiation objectives.

Follow the procedures at PGI 215.406-1 for establishing prenegotiation objectives.

Parent topic: 215.406 Documentation.
EXHIBIT 99.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002

I, William J. Gervais, principal executive officer of Qualstar Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, that:

| (1)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2002 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  
 
(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:     November 14,  2002

 
/s/ WILLIAM J. GERVAIS

 
 
**William J. Gervais Principal Executive Officer**

  |
161 So.2d 279

#### STATE of Louisiana, through the DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS v. Heyward (Heywood) Simpson TUCKER et al.

No. 47092.

March 11, 1964.

Court of Appeal, Second Circuit.

159 So.2d 432.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-2 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 1 of 11
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-2 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 2 of 11
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-2 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 3 of 11
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-2 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 4 of 11
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-2 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 5 of 11
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-2 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 6 of 11
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-2 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 7 of 11
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-2 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 8 of 11
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-2 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 9 of 11
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-2 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 10 of 11
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-2 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 11 of 11
§ 760.1108 Offsets, assignments, and debt settlement. ( a ) Any payment to any participant will be made without regard to any claim or lien against the commodity, or proceeds, in favor of the owner or any other creditor except agencies of the U.S. Government. The regulations governing offsets and withholdings in parts 792 and 1403 of this title apply to payments made under this subpart.
( b ) Any participant entitled to any payment may assign any payments in accordance with regulations governing the assignment of payments in part 1404 of this chapter.
Exhibit



EXHIBIT 10.2                    



RENASANT CORPORATION
EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
AMENDMENT NO. 1


THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 (the “Amendment”) is made and entered into by and between Kevin D. Chapman (“Executive”) and Renasant Corporation, a Mississippi corporation (the “Company”), and is intended to amend that certain Executive Employment Agreement by and between Executive and the Company, first effective as of January 1, 2016 (the “Employment Agreement”).  


1.    Effectiveness and Construction.  This Amendment shall be effective as of January 1, 2018; in all other respects, the terms of the Employment Agreement are hereby ratified and confirmed and shall remain in full force and effect.  


2.    Executive’s Separation from Service In Connection With a Change in Control.  Section 5.2(c) of the Employment Agreement shall be amended, to read in its entirety as follows:


		
	“c.
	A cash payment equal to 2.5 times the aggregate of Executive’s (i) Base Compensation in effect prior to the Change in Control, determined without regard to any reduction thereof giving rise to a Constructive Termination, and (ii) average bonus paid under the PBRP with respect to the Company’s two whole fiscal years preceding such Change in Control; such aggregate amount to be paid in the form of a single-sum not more than 60 days following Executive’s Separation Date.”




3.    Section 409A.  The following subsection (g) shall be added to Section 7.16 of the Employment Agreement to read in its entirety as follows:


		
	“(g)
	Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, any amount that could be paid in one of two calendar years hereunder shall be paid in the second such year.” 




THIS AMENDMENT was approved by the Board of Directors of the Company on December 20, 2017, to be effective as provided herein.


RENASANT CORPORATION:             KEVIN D. CHAPMAN: 


By: /s/ E. Robinson McGraw                By:  /s/ Kevin D. Chapman                                                             
Date: February 14, 2018                    Date: February 14, 2018
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) 2:06-CR-169-WKW

)

JAMES CALVIN TALLEY )

MOTION TO DECREASE DEFENDANT’S OFFENSE LEVEL

PURSUANT TO § 3E1.1(b), UNITED STATES SENTENCING GUIDELINES

(ACCEPTANCE OF RESPONSIBILITY)

COMES NOW the United States of America, by and through Leura G. Canary,

United States Attorney for the Middle District of Alabama, and files the above-captioned

Motion, and as reasons therefore, submits the following:

1. Defendant qualifies for a reduction in Defendant’s sentence pursuant to U.S.S.G

§ 3E1.1(b) as Defendant assisted authorities in the investigation and prosecution of

Defendant’s own misconduct by timely notifying authorities of Defendant’s intention to

enter a plea of guilty, thereby permitting the United States to avoid preparing for trial and

permitting the Government and this Court to allocate their resources efficiently.

2. Accordingly, pursuant to U.S.S.G § 3E1.1(b), the United States respectfully

moves this Court to reduce the Defendant’s offense level by one level. Combined with the

two-level reduction applied to Defendant’s offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1(a),

a total reduction of three levels should be applied to Defendant’s offense level for

Defendant’s acceptance of responsibility.

Respectfully submitted this the 29 day of January, 2008. th

LEURA G. CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

s/A. Clark Morris

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 530 Filed 01/29/2008 Page 1 of 3
A. CLARK MORRIS

Assistant United States Attorney

131 Clayton Street

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334)223-7280

Fax: (334)223-7135

E-mail: clark. morris@usdoj.gov

ASB-1613-N77A

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 530 Filed 01/29/2008 Page 2 of 3
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) 2:06-CR-169-WKW

)

JAMES CALVIN TALLEY )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on January 29, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing with

the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such

filing to the following: Richard Keith.

Respectfully submitted,

s/A. Clark Morris

A. CLARK MORRIS

Assistant United States Attorney 

131 Clayton Street 

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334)223-7280

Fax: (334)223-7135

E-mail: clark. morris@usdoj.gov

ASB-1613-N77A

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 530 Filed 01/29/2008 Page 3 of 3
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO.: 4:01cr47-SPM

WILLIE JAMES FRANCIS,

Defendant.

______________________________/

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

This cause comes before the Court on Defendant’s motion for

reconsideration (doc. 250). Upon review, the Court stands by its previous ruling

that Defendant is not eligible for a sentence reduction under (Amendment 750

and 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) because application of the amendment does not lower

Defendant’s sentencing range, which was determined by the mandatory

minimum. See United States v. Williams, 549 F.3d 1337 (11th Cir. 2008) (a 5k1

downward departure does not result in the removal of the mandatory minimum

when determining eligibility for a reduction under § 3582(c)) ; United States v.

Gomes, 621 F.3d 1343, 1346 (11th Cir. 2011) (Fair Sentencing Act’s changes to

drug amounts triggering statutory minimum mandatory sentences do not apply 

Case 4:01-cr-00047-MCR-AK Document 251 Filed 01/30/12 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

retroactively to defendants who were sentenced before its enactment). 

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: Defendant’s motion for reconsideration

(doc. 250) is denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 30th day of January, 2012.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

CASE NO.: 4:01cr47-SPM

Case 4:01-cr-00047-MCR-AK Document 251 Filed 01/30/12 Page 2 of 2
52.229-13 Taxes—Foreign Contracts in

Afghanistan.

As prescribed in 29.402-4(a), use the following clause:

Taxes—Foreign Contracts in Afghanistan (Nov 2021)

(a) Definition. U.S. Forces, as used in this clause, means the entity comprising the members of the

force and of the civilian component, and all property, equipment, and materiel of the United States

Armed Forces present in the territory of Afghanistan.

(b) Tax exemption. This acquisition is covered by the Security and Defense Cooperation Agreement

(the Agreement) between the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan (Afghanistan) and the United States of

America signed on September 30, 2014, and entered into force on January 1, 2015.

(1) The Agreement exempts the United States Government, and its contractors and subcontractors

(other than those that are Afghan legal entities or residents), from paying any tax or similar charge

assessed by the Government of Afghanistan on activities associated with this contract within

Afghanistan if the activities are on behalf of or in support of U.S. Forces. The Agreement also

exempts the acquisition, importation, exportation, reexportation, transportation, and use of supplies

and services in Afghanistan, on behalf of or in support of U.S. Forces, from any taxes, customs,

duties, fees, or similar charges imposed by the Government of Afghanistan.

(2) The Contractor shall exclude any Afghan taxes, customs, duties, fees, or similar charges from the

contract price, other than those charged to Afghan legal entities or residents.

(3) The Agreement does not exempt Afghan employees of Government contractors and

subcontractors from Afghan tax laws. To the extent required by Afghan law, the Contractor shall

withhold tax from the wages of these employees and remit those payments to the appropriate

Afghan taxing authority. These withholdings are an individual's liability, not a tax against the

Contractor.

(c) Subcontracts. The Contractor shall include the substance of this clause, including this paragraph

(c), in all subcontracts including subcontracts for commercial products or commercial services.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.229 [Reserved]
§ 760.22 Information to be furnished by manufacturer. The affected manufacturer shall furnish the Deputy Administrator, through the county committee, complete and accurate information sufficient to enable him to make the determination as to the manufacturer's eligibility to receive an indemnity payment. Such information shall include, but is not limited to: ( a ) A copy of the notice or other evidence of action by the public agency which resulted in the product being removed from the commercial market.
( b ) The name of the pesticide causing the removal of the product from the commercial market and, to the extent possible, the source of the pesticide.
( c ) A record of the quantity of milk or butterfat used to produce the product for which an indemnity payment is requested.
( d ) The identity of any pesticide used by the affected manufacturer.
( e ) Such other information as the Deputy Administrator may request to enable him to make the determinations required in this subpart.
# L_2014180EN.01000101.xml

| 20.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 180/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 180/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 674/2014

of 12 June 2014

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Charolais (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, France's application to register the name ‘Charolais’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, France's application to register the name ‘Charolais’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Charolais’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Charolais’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 June 2014.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 28, 31.1.2014, p. 16.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.3. Cheeses

FRANCE

Charolais (PDO)

---
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3136 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3136

  To suspend temporarily the duty on grass shears with rotating blade.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

 Mr. Chambliss introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on grass shears with rotating blade.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GRASS SHEARS WITH ROTATING BLADE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.82.01        grass shears with       Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           rotating blade                                                    31/2009          ''
                           (provided for in                                                                    .
                           subheading
                           8201.90.30)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 766.61 Reversal of a Disaster Set-Aside.

If the Agency determines that the borrower received an unauthorized DSA, the Agency will reverse the DSA after all appeals are concluded.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

PATRICIA GARNER-RUSSO, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

 )

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv626-WHA

 )

STATE OF ALABAMA, et al., )

 )

Defendants. )

ORDER

No timely objection having been filed to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge

(Doc. #23) and the Supplemental Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #25), the court

adopts the Recommendation and Supplemental Recommendation, and it is hereby ORDERED as

follows:

1. All pending Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED, and the claims against the moving

Defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice.

2. This entire action is DISMISSED with prejudice against all named Defendants,

including those for whom service has not been perfected.

3. Final Judgment will be entered accordingly.

DONE this 28th day of September, 2006.

/s/ W. Harold Albritton 

W. HAROLD ALBRITTON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 26 Filed 09/28/2006 Page 1 of 1