# L_2014307EN.01003801.xml

| 28.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 307/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 307/38

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION

of 9 October 2014

establishing best available techniques (BAT) conclusions, under Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on industrial emissions, for the refining of mineral oil and gas

(notified under document C(2014) 7155)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2014/738/EU)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control) (1), and in particular Article 13(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 13(1) of Directive 2010/75/EU requires the Commission to organise an exchange of information on industrial emissions between it and Member States, the industries concerned and non-governmental organisations promoting environmental protection in order to facilitate the drawing up of best available techniques (BAT) reference documents as defined in Article 3(11) of that Directive. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 13(1) of Directive 2010/75/EU requires the Commission to organise an exchange of information on industrial emissions between it and Member States, the industries concerned and non-governmental organisations promoting environmental protection in order to facilitate the drawing up of best available techniques (BAT) reference documents as defined in Article 3(11) of that Directive.

| (2) | In accordance with Article 13(2) of Directive 2010/75/EU, the exchange of information is to address the performance of installations and techniques in terms of emissions, expressed as short- and long-term averages, where appropriate, and the associated reference conditions, consumption and nature of raw materials, water consumption, use of energy and generation of waste and the techniques used, associated monitoring, cross-media effects, economic and technical viability and developments therein and best available techniques and emerging techniques identified after considering the issues mentioned in points (a) and (b) of Article 13(2) of that Directive. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In accordance with Article 13(2) of Directive 2010/75/EU, the exchange of information is to address the performance of installations and techniques in terms of emissions, expressed as short- and long-term averages, where appropriate, and the associated reference conditions, consumption and nature of raw materials, water consumption, use of energy and generation of waste and the techniques used, associated monitoring, cross-media effects, economic and technical viability and developments therein and best available techniques and emerging techniques identified after considering the issues mentioned in points (a) and (b) of Article 13(2) of that Directive.

| (3) | ‘BAT conclusions’ as defined in Article 3(12) of Directive 2010/75/EU are the key element of BAT reference documents and lay down the conclusions on best available techniques, their description, information to assess their applicability, the emission levels associated with the best available techniques, associated monitoring, associated consumption levels and, where appropriate, relevant site remediation measures. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

‘BAT conclusions’ as defined in Article 3(12) of Directive 2010/75/EU are the key element of BAT reference documents and lay down the conclusions on best available techniques, their description, information to assess their applicability, the emission levels associated with the best available techniques, associated monitoring, associated consumption levels and, where appropriate, relevant site remediation measures.

| (4) | In accordance with Article 14(3) of Directive 2010/75/EU, BAT conclusions are to be the reference for setting permit conditions for installations covered by Chapter II of that Directive. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

In accordance with Article 14(3) of Directive 2010/75/EU, BAT conclusions are to be the reference for setting permit conditions for installations covered by Chapter II of that Directive.

| (5) | Article 15(3) of Directive 2010/75/EU requires the competent authority to set emission limit values that ensure that, under normal operating conditions, emissions do not exceed the emission levels associated with the best available techniques as laid down in the decisions on BAT conclusions referred to in Article 13(5) of Directive 2010/75/EU. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

Article 15(3) of Directive 2010/75/EU requires the competent authority to set emission limit values that ensure that, under normal operating conditions, emissions do not exceed the emission levels associated with the best available techniques as laid down in the decisions on BAT conclusions referred to in Article 13(5) of Directive 2010/75/EU.

| (6) | Article 15(4) of Directive 2010/75/EU provides for derogations from the requirement laid down in Article 15(3) only where the costs associated with the achievement of the emission levels associated with the BAT disproportionately outweigh the environmental benefits due to the geographical location, the local environmental conditions or the technical characteristics of the installation concerned. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

Article 15(4) of Directive 2010/75/EU provides for derogations from the requirement laid down in Article 15(3) only where the costs associated with the achievement of the emission levels associated with the BAT disproportionately outweigh the environmental benefits due to the geographical location, the local environmental conditions or the technical characteristics of the installation concerned.

| (7) | Article 16(1) of Directive 2010/75/EU provides that the monitoring requirements in the permit referred to in point (c) of Article 14(1) of the Directive are to be based on the conclusions on monitoring as described in the BAT conclusions. |
| --- | --- |

(7)

Article 16(1) of Directive 2010/75/EU provides that the monitoring requirements in the permit referred to in point (c) of Article 14(1) of the Directive are to be based on the conclusions on monitoring as described in the BAT conclusions.

| (8) | In accordance with Article 21(3) of Directive 2010/75/EU, within 4 years of publication of decisions on BAT conclusions, the competent authority is to reconsider and, if necessary, update all the permit conditions and ensure that the installation complies with those permit conditions. |
| --- | --- |

(8)

In accordance with Article 21(3) of Directive 2010/75/EU, within 4 years of publication of decisions on BAT conclusions, the competent authority is to reconsider and, if necessary, update all the permit conditions and ensure that the installation complies with those permit conditions.

| (9) | The Commission established a forum composed of representatives of Member States, the industries concerned and non-governmental organisations promoting environmental protection by Decision of 16 May 2011 establishing a forum for the exchange of information pursuant to Article 13 of Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions (2). |
| --- | --- |

(9)

The Commission established a forum composed of representatives of Member States, the industries concerned and non-governmental organisations promoting environmental protection by Decision of 16 May 2011 establishing a forum for the exchange of information pursuant to Article 13 of Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions (2).

| (10) | In accordance with Article 13(4) of Directive 2010/75/EU, the Commission obtained the opinion of the forum, established by Decision of 16 May 2011, on the proposed content of the BAT reference document for the refining of mineral oil and gas on 20 September 2013 and made it publicly available. |
| --- | --- |

(10)

In accordance with Article 13(4) of Directive 2010/75/EU, the Commission obtained the opinion of the forum, established by Decision of 16 May 2011, on the proposed content of the BAT reference document for the refining of mineral oil and gas on 20 September 2013 and made it publicly available.

| (11) | The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 75(1) of Directive 2010/75/EU, |
| --- | --- |

(11)

The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 75(1) of Directive 2010/75/EU,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The BAT conclusions for the refining of mineral oil and gas, as set out in the Annex, are adopted.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 October 2014.

For the Commission

Janez POTOČNIK

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 334, 17.12.2010, p. 17.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 146, 17.5.2011, p. 3.

2

---

ANNEX

BAT CONCLUSIONS FOR THE REFINING OF MINERAL OIL AND GAS

| SCOPE | 41 |
| --- | --- |

| GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS | 43 |
| --- | --- |

| Averaging periods and reference conditions for emissions to air | 43 |
| --- | --- |

| Conversion of emissions concentration to reference oxygen level | 44 |
| --- | --- |

| Averaging periods and reference conditions for emissions to water | 44 |
| --- | --- |

| DEFINITIONS | 44 |
| --- | --- |

| 1.1. | General BAT conclusions for the refining of mineral oil and gas | 46 |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.1.

| 1.1.1. | Environmental management systems | 46 |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.1.1.

| 1.1.2. | Energy efficiency | 47 |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.1.2.

| 1.1.3. | Solid materials storage and handling | 48 |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.1.3.

| 1.1.4. | Monitoring of emissions to air and key process parameters | 48 |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.1.4.

| 1.1.5. | Operation of waste gas treatment systems | 49 |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.1.5.

| 1.1.6. | Monitoring of emissions to water | 50 |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.1.6.

| 1.1.7. | Emissions to water | 50 |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.1.7.

| 1.1.8. | Waste generation and management | 52 |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.1.8.

| 1.1.9. | Noise | 53 |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.1.9.

| 1.1.10. | BAT conclusions for integrated refinery management | 53 |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.1.10.

| 1.2. | BAT conclusions for the alkylation process | 54 |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.2.

| 1.2.1. | Hydrofluoric acid alkylation process | 54 |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.2.1.

| 1.2.2. | Sulphuric acid alkylation process | 54 |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2.

| 1.3. | BAT conclusions for base oil production processes | 54 |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.3.

| 1.4. | BAT conclusions for the bitumen production process | 55 |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.4.

| 1.5. | BAT conclusions for the fluid catalytic cracking process | 55 |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.5.

| 1.6. | BAT conclusions for the catalytic reforming process | 59 |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.6.

| 1.7. | BAT conclusions for the coking processes | 60 |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.7.

| 1.8. | BAT conclusions for the desalting process | 62 |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.8.

| 1.9. | BAT conclusions for the combustion units | 62 |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.9.

| 1.10. | BAT conclusions for the etherification process | 68 |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.10.

| 1.11. | BAT conclusions for the isomerisation process | 69 |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.11.

| 1.12. | BAT conclusions for the natural gas refinery | 69 |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.12.

| 1.13. | BAT conclusions for the distillation process | 69 |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.13.

| 1.14. | BAT conclusions for the products treatment process | 69 |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.14.

| 1.15. | BAT conclusions for storage and handling processes | 70 |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.15.

| 1.16. | BAT conclusions for visbreaking and other thermal processes | 71 |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.16.

| 1.17. | BAT conclusions for waste gas sulphur treatment | 72 |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.17.

| 1.18. | BAT conclusions for flares | 72 |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.18.

| 1.19. | BAT conclusions for integrated emission management | 73 |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.19.

| GLOSSARY | 75 |
| --- | --- |

| 1.20. | Description of techniques for the prevention and control of emissions to air | 75 |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.20.

| 1.20.1. | Dust | 75 |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.20.1.

| 1.20.2. | Nitrogen oxides (NOX) | 76 |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.20.2.

| 1.20.3. | Sulphur oxides (SOX) | 77 |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.20.3.

| 1.20.4. | Combined techniques (SOx, NOx and dust) | 79 |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.20.4.

| 1.20.5. | Carbon monoxide (CO) | 79 |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.20.5.

| 1.20.6. | Volatile organic compounds (VOC) | 79 |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.20.6.

| 1.20.7. | Other techniques | 81 |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.20.7.

| 1.21. | Description of techniques for the prevention and control of emissions to water | 82 |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.21.

| 1.21.1. | Waste water pretreatment | 82 |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.21.1.

| 1.21.2. | Waste water treatment | 82 |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.21.2.

SCOPE

These BAT conclusions cover certain industrial activities specified in Section 1.2 of Annex I to Directive 2010/75/EU, namely ‘1.2. Refining of mineral oil and gas’.

In particular, these BAT conclusions cover the following processes and activities:

| Activity | Subactivities or processes included in activity |
| --- | --- |
| Alkylation | All alkylation processes: hydrofluoric acid (HF), sulphuric acid (H2SO4) and solid-acid |
| Base oil production | Deasphalting, aromatic extraction, wax processing and lubricant oil hydrofinishing |
| Bitumen production | All techniques from storage to final product additives |
| Catalytic cracking | All types of catalytic cracking units such as fluid catalytic cracking |
| Catalytic reforming | Continuous, cyclic and semi-regenerative catalytic reforming |
| Coking | Delayed and fluid coking processes. Coke calcination |
| Cooling | Cooling techniques applied in refineries |
| Desalting | Desalting of crude oil |
| Combustion units for energy production | Combustion units burning refinery fuels, excluding units using only conventional or commercial fuels |
| Etherification | Production of chemicals (e.g. alcohols and ethers such as MTBE, ETBE and TAME) used as motor fuels additives |
| Gas separation | Separation of light fractions of the crude oil e.g. refinery fuel gas (RFG), liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) |
| Hydrogen consuming processes | Hydrocracking, hydrorefining, hydrotreatments, hydroconversion, hydroprocessing and hydrogenation processes |
| Hydrogen production | Partial oxidation, steam reforming, gas heated reforming and hydrogen purification |
| Isomerisation | Isomerisation of hydrocarbon compounds C4, C5 and C6 |
| Natural gas plants | Natural gas (NG) processing including liquefaction of NG |
| Polymerisation | Polymerisation, dimerisation and condensation |
| Primary distillation | Atmospheric and vacuum distillation |
| Product treatments | Sweetening and final product treatments |
| Storage and handling of refinery materials | Storage, blending, loading and unloading of refinery materials |
| Visbreaking and other thermal conversions | Thermal treatments such as visbreaking or thermal gas oil process |
| Waste gas treatment | Techniques to reduce or abate emissions to air |
| Waste water treatment | Techniques to treat waste water prior to release |
| Waste management | Techniques to prevent or reduce the generation of waste |

Activity

Subactivities or processes included in activity

Alkylation

All alkylation processes: hydrofluoric acid (HF), sulphuric acid (H2SO4) and solid-acid

Base oil production

Deasphalting, aromatic extraction, wax processing and lubricant oil hydrofinishing

Bitumen production

All techniques from storage to final product additives

Catalytic cracking

All types of catalytic cracking units such as fluid catalytic cracking

Catalytic reforming

Continuous, cyclic and semi-regenerative catalytic reforming

Coking

Delayed and fluid coking processes. Coke calcination

Cooling

Cooling techniques applied in refineries

Desalting

Desalting of crude oil

Combustion units for energy production

Combustion units burning refinery fuels, excluding units using only conventional or commercial fuels

Etherification

Production of chemicals (e.g. alcohols and ethers such as MTBE, ETBE and TAME) used as motor fuels additives

Gas separation

Separation of light fractions of the crude oil e.g. refinery fuel gas (RFG), liquefied petroleum gas (LPG)

Hydrogen consuming processes

Hydrocracking, hydrorefining, hydrotreatments, hydroconversion, hydroprocessing and hydrogenation processes

Hydrogen production

Partial oxidation, steam reforming, gas heated reforming and hydrogen purification

Isomerisation

Isomerisation of hydrocarbon compounds C4, C5 and C6

Natural gas plants

Natural gas (NG) processing including liquefaction of NG

Polymerisation

Polymerisation, dimerisation and condensation

Primary distillation

Atmospheric and vacuum distillation

Product treatments

Sweetening and final product treatments

Storage and handling of refinery materials

Storage, blending, loading and unloading of refinery materials

Visbreaking and other thermal conversions

Thermal treatments such as visbreaking or thermal gas oil process

Waste gas treatment

Techniques to reduce or abate emissions to air

Waste water treatment

Techniques to treat waste water prior to release

Waste management

Techniques to prevent or reduce the generation of waste

These BAT conclusions do not address the following activities or processes:

| — | the exploration and production of crude oil and natural gas; |
| --- | --- |

—

the exploration and production of crude oil and natural gas;

| — | the transportation of crude oil and natural gas; |
| --- | --- |

—

the transportation of crude oil and natural gas;

| — | the marketing and distribution of products. |
| --- | --- |

—

the marketing and distribution of products.

Other reference documents which may be relevant for the activities covered by these BAT conclusions are the following:

| Reference document | Subject |
| --- | --- |
| Common Waste Water and Waste Gas Treatment/Management Systems in the Chemical Sector (CWW) | Waste water management and treatment techniques |
| Industrial Cooling Systems (ICS) | Cooling processes |
| Economics and Cross-media Effects (ECM) | Economics and cross-media effects of techniques |
| Emissions from Storage (EFS) | Storage, blending, loading and unloading of refinery materials |
| Energy Efficiency (ENE) | Energy efficiency and integrated refinery management |
| Large Combustion Plants (LCP) | Combustion of conventional and commercial fuels |
| Large Volume Inorganic Chemicals — Ammonia, Acids and Fertilisers Industries (LVIC-AAF) | Steam reforming and hydrogen purification |
| Large Volume Organic Chemical Industry (LVOC) | Etherification process (MTBE, ETBE and TAME production) |
| Waste Incineration (WI) | Waste incineration |
| Waste Treatment (WT) | Waste treatment |
| General Principles of Monitoring (MON) | Monitoring of emissions to air and water |

Reference document

Subject

Common Waste Water and Waste Gas Treatment/Management Systems in the Chemical Sector (CWW)

Waste water management and treatment techniques

Industrial Cooling Systems (ICS)

Cooling processes

Economics and Cross-media Effects (ECM)

Economics and cross-media effects of techniques

Emissions from Storage (EFS)

Storage, blending, loading and unloading of refinery materials

Energy Efficiency (ENE)

Energy efficiency and integrated refinery management

Large Combustion Plants (LCP)

Combustion of conventional and commercial fuels

Large Volume Inorganic Chemicals — Ammonia, Acids and Fertilisers Industries (LVIC-AAF)

Steam reforming and hydrogen purification

Large Volume Organic Chemical Industry (LVOC)

Etherification process (MTBE, ETBE and TAME production)

Waste Incineration (WI)

Waste incineration

Waste Treatment (WT)

Waste treatment

General Principles of Monitoring (MON)

Monitoring of emissions to air and water

GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS

The techniques listed and described in these BAT conclusions are neither prescriptive nor exhaustive. Other techniques may be used that ensure at least an equivalent level of environmental protection.

Unless otherwise stated, these BAT conclusions are generally applicable.

Averaging periods and reference conditions for emissions to air

Unless stated otherwise, emission levels associated with the best available techniques (BAT-AELs) for emissions to air given in these BAT conclusions refer to concentrations, expressed as mass of emitted substance per volume of waste gas under the following standard conditions: dry gas, temperature of 273,15 K, pressure of 101,3 kPa.

| For continuous measurements | BAT-AELs refer to monthly average values, which are the averages of all valid hourly average values measured over a period of one month |
| --- | --- |
| For periodic measurements | BAT-AELs refer to the average value of three spot samples of at least 30 minutes each |

For continuous measurements

BAT-AELs refer to monthly average values, which are the averages of all valid hourly average values measured over a period of one month

For periodic measurements

BAT-AELs refer to the average value of three spot samples of at least 30 minutes each

For combustion units, catalytic cracking processes, and waste gas sulphur recovery units, reference conditions for oxygen are shown in Table 1.

Table 1

Reference conditions for BAT-AELs concerning emissions to air

| Activities | Unit | Oxygen reference conditions |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Combustion unit using liquid or gaseous fuels with the exception of gas turbines and engines | mg/Nm3 | 3 % oxygen by volume |
| Combustion unit using solid fuels | mg/Nm3 | 6 % oxygen by volume |
| Gas turbines (including combined cycle gas turbines — CCGT) and engines | mg/Nm3 | 15 % oxygen by volume |
| Catalytic cracking process (regenerator) | mg/Nm3 | 3 % oxygen by volume |
| Waste gas sulphur recovery unit (1) | mg/Nm3 | 3 % oxygen by volume |

Activities

Unit

Oxygen reference conditions

Combustion unit using liquid or gaseous fuels with the exception of gas turbines and engines

mg/Nm3

3 % oxygen by volume

Combustion unit using solid fuels

mg/Nm3

6 % oxygen by volume

Gas turbines (including combined cycle gas turbines — CCGT) and engines

mg/Nm3

15 % oxygen by volume

Catalytic cracking process (regenerator)

mg/Nm3

3 % oxygen by volume

Waste gas sulphur recovery unit (1)

mg/Nm3

3 % oxygen by volume

Conversion of emissions concentration to reference oxygen level

The formula for calculating the emissions concentration at a reference oxygen level (see Table 1) is shown below.

Formula

Where:

| ER (mg/Nm3) | : | emissions concentration referred to the reference oxygen level OR |
| --- | --- | --- |
| OR (vol %) | : | reference oxygen level |
| EM (mg/Nm3) | : | emissions concentration referred to the measured oxygen level OM |
| OM (vol %) | : | measured oxygen level. |

ER (mg/Nm3)

:

emissions concentration referred to the reference oxygen level OR

OR (vol %)

:

reference oxygen level

EM (mg/Nm3)

:

emissions concentration referred to the measured oxygen level OM

OM (vol %)

:

measured oxygen level.

Averaging periods and reference conditions for emissions to water

Unless stated otherwise, emission levels associated with the best available techniques (BAT-AELs) for emissions to water given in these BAT conclusions refer to values of concentration (mass of emitted substances per volume of water) expressed in mg/l.

Unless stated otherwise, the averaging periods associated with the BAT-AELs are defined as follows:

| Daily average | Average over a sampling period of 24 hours taken as a flow-proportional composite sample or, provided that sufficient flow stability is demonstrated, from a time-proportional sample |
| --- | --- |
| Yearly/Monthly average | Average of all daily averages obtained within a year/month, weighted according to the daily flows |

Daily average

Average over a sampling period of 24 hours taken as a flow-proportional composite sample or, provided that sufficient flow stability is demonstrated, from a time-proportional sample

Yearly/Monthly average

Average of all daily averages obtained within a year/month, weighted according to the daily flows

DEFINITIONS

For the purpose of these BAT conclusions, the following definitions apply:

| Term used | Definition |
| --- | --- |
| Unit | A segment/subpart of the installation in which a specific processing operation is conducted |
| New unit | A unit first permitted on the site of the installation following the publication of these BAT conclusions or a complete replacement of a unit on the existing foundations of the installation following the publication of these BAT conclusions |
| Existing unit | A unit which is not a new unit |
| Process off-gas | The collected gas generated by a process which must be treated e.g. in an acid gas removal unit and a sulphur recovery unit (SRU) |
| Flue-gas | The exhaust gas exiting a unit after an oxidation step, generally combustion (e.g. regenerator, Claus unit) |
| Tail gas | Common name of the exhaust gas from an SRU (generally Claus process) |
| VOC | Volatile organic compounds as defined in Article 3(45) of Directive 2010/75/EU |
| NMVOC | VOC excluding methane |
| Diffuse VOC emissions | Non-channelled VOC emissions that are not released via specific emission points such as stacks. They can result from ‘area’ sources (e.g. tanks) or ‘point’ sources (e.g. pipe flanges) |
| NOX expressed as NO2 | The sum of nitrogen oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) expressed as NO2 |
| SOX expressed as SO2 | The sum of sulphur dioxide (SO2) and sulphur trioxide (SO3) expressed as SO2 |
| H2S | Hydrogen sulphide. Carbonyl sulphide and mercaptan are not included |
| Hydrogen chloride expressed as HCl | All gaseous chlorides expressed as HCl |
| Hydrogen fluoride expressed as HF | All gaseous fluorides expressed as HF |
| FCC unit | Fluid catalytic cracking: a conversion process for upgrading heavy hydrocarbons, using heat and a catalyst to break larger hydrocarbon molecules into lighter molecules |
| SRU | Sulphur recovery unit. See definition in Section 1.20.3 |
| Refinery fuel | Solid, liquid or gaseous combustible material from the distillation and conversion steps of the refining of crude oil.
  Examples are refinery fuel gas (RFG), syngas and refinery oils, pet coke |
| RFG | Refinery fuel gas: off-gases from distillation or conversion units used as a fuel |
| Combustion unit | Unit burning refinery fuels alone or with other fuels for the production of energy at the refinery site, such as boilers (except CO boilers), furnaces, and gas turbines. |
| Continuous measurement | Measurement using an ‘automated measuring system’ (AMS) or a ‘continuous emission monitoring system’ (CEMS) permanently installed on site |
| Periodic measurement | Determination of a measurand at specified time intervals using manual or automated reference methods |
| Indirect monitoring of emissions to air | Estimation of the emissions concentration in the flue-gas of a pollutant obtained through an appropriate combination of measurements of surrogate parameters (such as O2 content, sulphur or nitrogen content in the feed/fuel), calculations and periodic stack measurements. The use of emission ratios based on S content in the fuel is one example of indirect monitoring. Another example of indirect monitoring is the use of PEMS |
| Predictive Emissions monitoring system (PEMS) | System to determine the emissions concentration of a pollutant based on its relationship with a number of characteristic continuously monitored process parameters (e.g. fuel-gas consumption, air/fuel ratio) and fuel or feed quality data (e.g. the sulphur content) of an emission source |
| Volatile liquid hydrocarbon compounds | Petroleum derivatives with a Reid vapour pressure (RVP) of more than 4 kPa, such as naphtha and aromatics |
| Recovery rate | Percentage of NMVOC recovered from the streams conveyed into a vapour recovery unit (VRU) |

Term used

Definition

Unit

A segment/subpart of the installation in which a specific processing operation is conducted

New unit

A unit first permitted on the site of the installation following the publication of these BAT conclusions or a complete replacement of a unit on the existing foundations of the installation following the publication of these BAT conclusions

Existing unit

A unit which is not a new unit

Process off-gas

The collected gas generated by a process which must be treated e.g. in an acid gas removal unit and a sulphur recovery unit (SRU)

Flue-gas

The exhaust gas exiting a unit after an oxidation step, generally combustion (e.g. regenerator, Claus unit)

Tail gas

Common name of the exhaust gas from an SRU (generally Claus process)

VOC

Volatile organic compounds as defined in Article 3(45) of Directive 2010/75/EU

NMVOC

VOC excluding methane

Diffuse VOC emissions

Non-channelled VOC emissions that are not released via specific emission points such as stacks. They can result from ‘area’ sources (e.g. tanks) or ‘point’ sources (e.g. pipe flanges)

NOX expressed as NO2

The sum of nitrogen oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) expressed as NO2

SOX expressed as SO2

The sum of sulphur dioxide (SO2) and sulphur trioxide (SO3) expressed as SO2

H2S

Hydrogen sulphide. Carbonyl sulphide and mercaptan are not included

Hydrogen chloride expressed as HCl

All gaseous chlorides expressed as HCl

Hydrogen fluoride expressed as HF

All gaseous fluorides expressed as HF

FCC unit

Fluid catalytic cracking: a conversion process for upgrading heavy hydrocarbons, using heat and a catalyst to break larger hydrocarbon molecules into lighter molecules

SRU

Sulphur recovery unit. See definition in Section 1.20.3

Refinery fuel

Solid, liquid or gaseous combustible material from the distillation and conversion steps of the refining of crude oil.

Examples are refinery fuel gas (RFG), syngas and refinery oils, pet coke

RFG

Refinery fuel gas: off-gases from distillation or conversion units used as a fuel

Combustion unit

Unit burning refinery fuels alone or with other fuels for the production of energy at the refinery site, such as boilers (except CO boilers), furnaces, and gas turbines.

Continuous measurement

Measurement using an ‘automated measuring system’ (AMS) or a ‘continuous emission monitoring system’ (CEMS) permanently installed on site

Periodic measurement

Determination of a measurand at specified time intervals using manual or automated reference methods

Indirect monitoring of emissions to air

Estimation of the emissions concentration in the flue-gas of a pollutant obtained through an appropriate combination of measurements of surrogate parameters (such as O2 content, sulphur or nitrogen content in the feed/fuel), calculations and periodic stack measurements. The use of emission ratios based on S content in the fuel is one example of indirect monitoring. Another example of indirect monitoring is the use of PEMS

Predictive Emissions monitoring system (PEMS)

System to determine the emissions concentration of a pollutant based on its relationship with a number of characteristic continuously monitored process parameters (e.g. fuel-gas consumption, air/fuel ratio) and fuel or feed quality data (e.g. the sulphur content) of an emission source

Volatile liquid hydrocarbon compounds

Petroleum derivatives with a Reid vapour pressure (RVP) of more than 4 kPa, such as naphtha and aromatics

Recovery rate

Percentage of NMVOC recovered from the streams conveyed into a vapour recovery unit (VRU)

1.1.   General BAT conclusions for the refining of mineral oil and gas

The process-specific BAT conclusions included in Sections 1.2 to 1.19 apply in addition to the general BAT conclusions mentioned in this section.

1.1.1.   Environmental management systems

| BAT 1. | In order to improve the overall environmental performance of plants for the refining of mineral oil and gas, BAT is to implement and adhere to an environmental management system (EMS) that incorporates all of the following features:






  (i) | commitment of the management, including senior management; |
| --- | --- | --- |

BAT 1.

(i)

commitment of the management, including senior management;

| (ii) | definition of an environmental policy that includes the continuous improvement for the installation by the management; |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

definition of an environmental policy that includes the continuous improvement for the installation by the management;

| (iii) | planning and establishing the necessary procedures, objectives and targets, in conjunction with financial planning and investment; |
| --- | --- |

(iii)

planning and establishing the necessary procedures, objectives and targets, in conjunction with financial planning and investment;

| (iv) | implementation of the procedures paying particular attention to:






  (a) | structure and responsibility |
| --- | --- | --- |

(iv)

implementation of the procedures paying particular attention to:

(a)

structure and responsibility

| (b) | training, awareness and competence |
| --- | --- |

(b)

training, awareness and competence

| (c) | communication |
| --- | --- |

(c)

communication

| (d) | employee involvement |
| --- | --- |

(d)

employee involvement

| (e) | documentation |
| --- | --- |

(e)

documentation

| (f) | efficient process control |
| --- | --- |

(f)

efficient process control

| (g) | maintenance programmes |
| --- | --- |

(g)

maintenance programmes

| (h) | emergency preparedness and response |
| --- | --- |

(h)

emergency preparedness and response

| (i) | safeguarding compliance with environmental legislation. |
| --- | --- |

(i)

safeguarding compliance with environmental legislation.

| (v) | checking performance and taking corrective action, paying particular attention to:






  (a) | monitoring and measurement (see also the reference document on the General Principles of Monitoring) |
| --- | --- | --- |

(v)

checking performance and taking corrective action, paying particular attention to:

(a)

monitoring and measurement (see also the reference document on the General Principles of Monitoring)

| (b) | corrective and preventive action |
| --- | --- |

(b)

corrective and preventive action

| (c) | maintenance of records |
| --- | --- |

(c)

maintenance of records

| (d) | independent (where practicable) internal and external auditing in order to determine whether or not the EMS conforms to planned arrangements and has been properly implemented and maintained; |
| --- | --- |

(d)

independent (where practicable) internal and external auditing in order to determine whether or not the EMS conforms to planned arrangements and has been properly implemented and maintained;

| (vi) | review of the EMS and its continuing suitability, adequacy and effectiveness by senior management; |
| --- | --- |

(vi)

review of the EMS and its continuing suitability, adequacy and effectiveness by senior management;

| (vii) | following the development of cleaner technologies; |
| --- | --- |

(vii)

following the development of cleaner technologies;

| (viii) | consideration for the environmental impacts from the eventual decommissioning of the installation at the stage of designing a new plant, and throughout its operating life; |
| --- | --- |

(viii)

consideration for the environmental impacts from the eventual decommissioning of the installation at the stage of designing a new plant, and throughout its operating life;

| (ix) | application of sectoral benchmarking on a regular basis. |
| --- | --- |

(ix)

application of sectoral benchmarking on a regular basis.

Applicability

The scope (e.g. level of detail) and nature of the EMS (e.g. standardised or non-standardised) will generally be related to the nature, scale and complexity of the installation, and the range of environmental impacts it may have.

1.1.2.   Energy efficiency

| BAT 2. | In order to use energy efficiently, BAT is to use an appropriate combination of the techniques given below.






  Technique | Description |
| --- | --- | --- |
| (i)   Design techniques |
| a. | Pinch analysis |

BAT 2.

Technique

Description

Design techniques

a.

Pinch analysis

Methodology based on a systematic calculation of thermodynamic targets for minimising energy consumption of processes. Used as a tool for the evaluation of total systems designs

| b. | Heat integration |
| --- | --- |

b.

Heat integration

Heat integration of process systems ensures that a substantial proportion of the heat required in various processes is provided by exchanging heat between streams to be heated and streams to be cooled

| c. | Heat and power recovery |
| --- | --- |

c.

Heat and power recovery

Use of energy recovery devices e.g.:

| — | waste heat boilers |
| --- | --- |

—

waste heat boilers

| — | expanders/power recovery in the FCC unit |
| --- | --- |

—

expanders/power recovery in the FCC unit

| — | use of waste heat in district heating |
| --- | --- |

—

use of waste heat in district heating

Process control and maintenance techniques

| a. | Process optimisation |
| --- | --- |

a.

Process optimisation

Automated controlled combustion in order to lower the fuel consumption per tonne of feed processed, often combined with heat integration for improving furnace efficiency

| b. | Management and reduction of steam consumption |
| --- | --- |

b.

Management and reduction of steam consumption

Systematic mapping of drain valve systems in order to reduce steam consumption and optimise its use

| c. | Use of energy benchmark |
| --- | --- |

c.

Use of energy benchmark

Participation in ranking and benchmarking activities in order to achieve continuous improvement by learning from best practice

Energy-efficient production techniques

| a. | Use of combined heat and power |
| --- | --- |

a.

Use of combined heat and power

System designed for the co-production (or the cogeneration) of heat (e.g. steam) and electric power from the same fuel

| b. | Integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) |
| --- | --- |

b.

Integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC)

Technique whose purpose is to produce steam, hydrogen (optional) and electric power from a variety of fuel types (e.g. heavy fuel oil or coke) with a high conversion efficiency

1.1.3.   Solid materials storage and handling

| BAT 3. | In order to prevent or, where that is not practicable, to reduce dust emissions from the storage and handling of dusty materials, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below:






  (i) | store bulk powder materials in enclosed silos equipped with a dust abatement system (e.g. fabric filter); |
| --- | --- | --- |

BAT 3.

(i)

store bulk powder materials in enclosed silos equipped with a dust abatement system (e.g. fabric filter);

| (ii) | store fine materials in enclosed containers or sealed bags; |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

store fine materials in enclosed containers or sealed bags;

| (iii) | keep stockpiles of coarse dusty material wetted, stabilise the surface with crusting agents, or store under cover in stockpiles; |
| --- | --- |

(iii)

keep stockpiles of coarse dusty material wetted, stabilise the surface with crusting agents, or store under cover in stockpiles;

| (iv) | use road cleaning vehicles. |
| --- | --- |

(iv)

use road cleaning vehicles.

1.1.4.   Monitoring of emissions to air and key process parameters

| BAT 4. | BAT is to monitor emissions to air by using the monitoring techniques with at least the minimum frequency given below and in accordance with EN standards. If EN standards are not available, BAT is to use ISO, national or other international standards that ensure the provision of data of an equivalent scientific quality.








  Description | Unit | Minimum frequency | Monitoring technique |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| (i) | SOX, NOX, and dust emissions |

BAT 4.

Description

Unit

Minimum frequency

Monitoring technique

(i)

SOX, NOX, and dust emissions

Catalytic cracking

Continuous (2)
   (3)

Direct measurement

Combustion units

≥ 100 MW (4)

and calcining units

Continuous (2)
   (3)

Direct measurement (5)

Combustion units

of 50 to 100 MW (4)

Continuous (2)
   (3)

Direct measurement or indirect monitoring

Combustion units

< 50 MW (4)

Once a year and after significant fuel changes (6)

Direct measurement or indirect monitoring

Sulphur recovery units (SRU)

Continuous for SO2 only

Direct measurement or indirect monitoring (7)

| (ii) | NH3 emissions |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

NH3 emissions

All units equipped with SCR or SNCR

Continuous

Direct measurement

| (iii) | CO emissions |
| --- | --- |

(iii)

CO emissions

Catalytic cracking and combustion units

≥ 100 MW (4)

Continuous

Direct measurement

Other combustion units

Once every 6 months (6)

Direct measurement

| (iv) | Metals emissions: Nickel (Ni), Antimony (Sb) (8), Vanadium (V) |
| --- | --- |

(iv)

Metals emissions: Nickel (Ni), Antimony (Sb) (8), Vanadium (V)

Catalytic cracking

Once every 6 months and after significant changes to the unit (6)

Direct measurement or analysis based on metals content in the catalyst fines and in the fuel

Combustion units (9)

| (v) | Polychlorinated dibenzodioxins/furans (PCDD/F) emissions |
| --- | --- |

(v)

Polychlorinated dibenzodioxins/furans (PCDD/F) emissions

Catalytic reformer

Once a year or once a regeneration, whichever is longer

Direct measurement

| BAT 5. | BAT is to monitor the relevant process parameters linked to pollutant emissions, at catalytic cracking and combustion units by using appropriate techniques and with at least the frequency given below.






  Description | Minimum frequency |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Monitoring of parameters linked to pollutant emissions, e.g. O2 content in flue-gas, N and S content in fuel or feed (10) | Continuous for O2 content.
  For N and S content, periodic at a frequency based on significant fuel/feed changes |

BAT 5.

Description

Minimum frequency

Monitoring of parameters linked to pollutant emissions, e.g. O2 content in flue-gas, N and S content in fuel or feed (10)

Continuous for O2 content.

For N and S content, periodic at a frequency based on significant fuel/feed changes

| BAT 6. | BAT is to monitor diffuse VOC emissions to air from the entire site by using all of the following techniques:






  (i) | sniffing methods associated with correlation curves for key equipment; |
| --- | --- | --- |

BAT 6.

(i)

sniffing methods associated with correlation curves for key equipment;

| (ii) | optical gas imaging techniques; |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

optical gas imaging techniques;

| (iii) | calculations of chronic emissions based on emissions factors periodically (e.g. once every two years) validated by measurements. |
| --- | --- |

(iii)

calculations of chronic emissions based on emissions factors periodically (e.g. once every two years) validated by measurements.

The screening and quantification of site emissions by periodic campaigns with optical absorption-based techniques, such as differential absorption light detection and ranging (DIAL) or solar occultation flux (SOF) is a useful complementary technique.

Description

See Section 1.20.6.

1.1.5.   Operation of waste gas treatment systems

| BAT 7. | In order to prevent or reduce emissions to air, BAT is to operate the acid gas removal units, sulphur recovery units and all other waste gas treatment systems with a high availability and at optimal capacity. |
| --- | --- |

BAT 7.

Description

Special procedures can be defined for other than normal operating conditions, in particular:

| (i) | during start-up and shutdown operations; |
| --- | --- |

(i)

during start-up and shutdown operations;

| (ii) | during other circumstances that could affect the proper functioning of the systems (e.g. regular and extraordinary maintenance work and cleaning operations of the units and/or of the waste gas treatment system); |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

during other circumstances that could affect the proper functioning of the systems (e.g. regular and extraordinary maintenance work and cleaning operations of the units and/or of the waste gas treatment system);

| (iii) | in case of insufficient waste gas flow or temperature which prevents the use of the waste gas treatment system at full capacity. |
| --- | --- |

(iii)

in case of insufficient waste gas flow or temperature which prevents the use of the waste gas treatment system at full capacity.

| BAT 8. | In order to prevent and reduce ammonia (NH3) emissions to air when applying selective catalytic reduction (SCR) or selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR) techniques, BAT is to maintain suitable operating conditions of the SCR or SNCR waste gas treatment systems, with the aim of limiting emissions of unreacted NH3.
  BAT-associated emission levels: See Table 2.

  Table 2


  BAT-associated emission levels for ammonia (NH3) emissions to air for a combustion or process unit where SCR or SNCR techniques are used







  Parameter | BAT-AEL
  z(monthly average)
  mg/Nm3 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Ammonia expressed as NH3 | < 5 – 15 (11)
   (12) |

BAT 8.

BAT-associated emission levels: See Table 2.

Table 2

BAT-associated emission levels for ammonia (NH3) emissions to air for a combustion or process unit where SCR or SNCR techniques are used

Parameter

BAT-AEL

z(monthly average)

mg/Nm3

Ammonia expressed as NH3

< 5 – 15 (11)
   (12)

| BAT 9. | In order to prevent and reduce emissions to air when using a sour water steam stripping unit, BAT is to route the acid off-gases from this unit to an SRU or any equivalent gas treatment system.
  It is not BAT to directly incinerate the untreated sour water stripping gases. |
| --- | --- |

BAT 9.

It is not BAT to directly incinerate the untreated sour water stripping gases.

1.1.6.   Monitoring of emissions to water

| BAT 10. | BAT is to monitor emissions to water by using the monitoring techniques with at least the frequency given in Table 3) and in accordance with EN standards. If EN standards are not available, BAT is to use ISO, national or other international standards that ensure the provision of data of an equivalent scientific quality. |
| --- | --- |

BAT 10.

1.1.7.   Emissions to water

| BAT 11. | In order to reduce water consumption and the volume of contaminated water, BAT is to use all of the techniques given below.







  Technique | Description | Applicability |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| (i) | Water stream integration |

BAT 11.

Technique

Description

Applicability

(i)

Water stream integration

Reduction of process water produced at the unit level prior to discharge by the internal reuse of water streams from e.g. cooling, condensates, especially for use in crude desalting

Generally applicable for new units. For existing units, applicability may require a complete rebuilding of the unit or the installation

| (ii) | Water and drainage system for segregation of contaminated water streams |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

Water and drainage system for segregation of contaminated water streams

Design of an industrial site to optimise water management, where each stream is treated as appropriate, by e.g. routing generated sour water (from distillation, cracking, coking units, etc.) to appropriate pretreatment, such as a stripping unit

Generally applicable for new units. For existing units, applicability may require a complete rebuilding of the unit or the installation

| (iii) | Segregation of non-contaminated water streams (e.g. once-through cooling, rain water) |
| --- | --- |

(iii)

Segregation of non-contaminated water streams (e.g. once-through cooling, rain water)

Design of a site in order to avoid sending non-contaminated water to general waste water treatment and to have a separate release after possible reuse for this type of stream

Generally applicable for new units.

For existing units, applicability may require a complete rebuilding of the unit or the installation

| (iv) | Prevention of spillages and leaks |
| --- | --- |

(iv)

Prevention of spillages and leaks

Practices that include the utilisation of special procedures and/or temporary equipment to maintain performances when necessary to manage special circumstances such as spills, loss of containment, etc.

Generally applicable

| BAT 12. | In order to reduce the emission load of pollutants in the waste water discharge to the receiving water body, BAT is to remove insoluble and soluble polluting substances by using all of the techniques given below.







  Technique | Description | Applicability |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| (i) | Removal of insoluble substances by recovering oil |

BAT 12.

Technique

Description

Applicability

(i)

Removal of insoluble substances by recovering oil

See Section 1.21.2

Generally applicable

| (ii) | Removal of insoluble substances by recovering suspended solids and dispersed oil |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

Removal of insoluble substances by recovering suspended solids and dispersed oil

See Section 1.21.2

Generally applicable

| (iii) | Removal of soluble substances including biological treatment and clarification |
| --- | --- |

(iii)

Removal of soluble substances including biological treatment and clarification

See Section 1.21.2

Generally applicable

BAT-associated emission levels: See Table 3.

| BAT 13. | When further removal of organic substances or nitrogen is needed, BAT is to use an additional treatment step as described in Section 1.21.2.

  Table 3


  BAT-associated emission levels for direct waste water discharges from the refining of mineral oil and gas and monitoring frequencies associated with BAT
   (13)









  Parameter | Unit | BAT-AEL
  (yearly average) | Monitoring (14) frequency and analytical method (standard) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Hydrocarbon oil index (HOI) | mg/l | 0,1-2,5 | Daily
  EN 9377- 2 (15) |
| Total suspended solids (TSS) | mg/l | 5-25 | Daily |
| Chemical oxygen demand (COD) (16) | mg/l | 30-125 | Daily |
| BOD5 | mg/l | No BAT-AEL | Weekly |
| Total nitrogen (17), expressed as N | mg/l | 1-25 (18) | Daily |
| Lead, expressed as Pb | mg/l | 0,005-0,030 | Quarterly |
| Cadmium, expressed as Cd | mg/l | 0,002-0,008 | Quarterly |
| Nickel, expressed as Ni | mg/l | 0,005-0,100 | Quarterly |
| Mercury, expressed as Hg | mg/l | 0,0001-0,001 | Quarterly |
| Vanadium | mg/l | No BAT-AEL | Quarterly |
| Phenol Index | mg/l | No BAT-AEL | Monthly
  EN 14402 |
| Benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, xylene (BTEX) | mg/l | Benzene: 0,001-0,050
  No BAT-AEL for T, E, X | Monthly |

BAT 13.

Table 3

BAT-associated emission levels for direct waste water discharges from the refining of mineral oil and gas and monitoring frequencies associated with BAT
   (13)

Parameter

Unit

BAT-AEL

(yearly average)

Monitoring (14) frequency and analytical method (standard)

Hydrocarbon oil index (HOI)

mg/l

0,1-2,5

Daily

EN 9377- 2 (15)

Total suspended solids (TSS)

mg/l

5-25

Daily

Chemical oxygen demand (COD) (16)

mg/l

30-125

Daily

BOD5

mg/l

No BAT-AEL

Weekly

Total nitrogen (17), expressed as N

mg/l

1-25 (18)

Daily

Lead, expressed as Pb

mg/l

0,005-0,030

Quarterly

Cadmium, expressed as Cd

mg/l

0,002-0,008

Quarterly

Nickel, expressed as Ni

mg/l

0,005-0,100

Quarterly

Mercury, expressed as Hg

mg/l

0,0001-0,001

Quarterly

Vanadium

mg/l

No BAT-AEL

Quarterly

Phenol Index

mg/l

No BAT-AEL

Monthly

EN 14402

Benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, xylene (BTEX)

mg/l

Benzene: 0,001-0,050

No BAT-AEL for T, E, X

Monthly

1.1.8.   Waste generation and management

| BAT 14. | In order to prevent or, where that is not practicable, to reduce waste generation, BAT is to adopt and implement a waste management plan that, in order of priority, ensures that waste is prepared for reuse, recycling, recovery or disposal. |
| --- | --- |

BAT 14.

| BAT 15. | In order to reduce the amount of sludge to be treated or disposed of, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.







  Technique | Description | Applicability |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| (i) | Sludge pretreatment |

BAT 15.

Technique

Description

Applicability

(i)

Sludge pretreatment

Prior to final treatment (e.g. in a fluidised bed incinerator), the sludges are dewatered and/or de-oiled (by e.g. centrifugal decanters or steam dryers) to reduce their volume and to recover oil from slop equipment

Generally applicable

| (ii) | Reuse of sludge in process units |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

Reuse of sludge in process units

Certain types of sludge (e.g. oily sludge) can be processed in units (e.g. coking) as part of the feed due to their oil content

Applicability is restricted to sludges that can fulfil the requirements to be processed in units with appropriate treatment

| BAT 16. | In order to reduce the generation of spent solid catalyst waste, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.






  Technique | Description |
| --- | --- | --- |
| (i) | Spent solid catalyst management |

BAT 16.

Technique

Description

(i)

Spent solid catalyst management

Scheduled and safe handling of the materials used as catalyst (e.g. by contractors) in order to recover or reuse them in off-site facilities. These operations depend on the type of catalyst and process

| (ii) | Removal of catalyst from slurry decant oil |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

Removal of catalyst from slurry decant oil

Decanted oil sludge from process units (e.g. FCC unit) can contain significant concentrations of catalyst fines. These fines need to be separated prior to the reuse of decant oil as a feedstock

1.1.9.   Noise

| BAT 17. | In order to prevent or reduce noise, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below:






  (i) | make an environmental noise assessment and formulate a noise management plan as appropriate to the local environment; |
| --- | --- | --- |

BAT 17.

(i)

make an environmental noise assessment and formulate a noise management plan as appropriate to the local environment;

| (ii) | enclose noisy equipment/operation in a separate structure/unit; |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

enclose noisy equipment/operation in a separate structure/unit;

| (iii) | use embankments to screen the source of noise; |
| --- | --- |

(iii)

use embankments to screen the source of noise;

| (iv) | use noise protection walls. |
| --- | --- |

(iv)

use noise protection walls.

1.1.10.   BAT conclusions for integrated refinery management

| BAT 18. | In order to prevent or reduce diffuse VOC emissions, BAT is to apply the techniques given below.







  Technique | Description | Applicability |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| I. | Techniques related to plant design |

BAT 18.

Technique

Description

Applicability

I.

Techniques related to plant design

| (i) | limiting the number of potential emission sources |
| --- | --- |

(i)

limiting the number of potential emission sources

| (ii) | maximising inherent process containment features |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

maximising inherent process containment features

| (iii) | selecting high integrity equipment |
| --- | --- |

(iii)

selecting high integrity equipment

| (iv) | facilitating monitoring and maintenance activities by ensuring access to potentially leaking components |
| --- | --- |

(iv)

facilitating monitoring and maintenance activities by ensuring access to potentially leaking components

Applicability may be limited for existing units

| II. | Techniques related to plant installation and commissioning |
| --- | --- |

II.

Techniques related to plant installation and commissioning

| (i) | well-defined procedures for construction and assembly |
| --- | --- |

(i)

well-defined procedures for construction and assembly

| (ii) | robust commissioning and hand-over procedures to ensure that the plant is installed in line with the design requirements |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

robust commissioning and hand-over procedures to ensure that the plant is installed in line with the design requirements

Applicability may be limited for existing units

| III. | Techniques related to plant operation |
| --- | --- |

III.

Techniques related to plant operation

Use of a risk-based leak detection and repair (LDAR) programme in order to identify leaking components, and to repair these leaks.

See Section 1.20.6

Generally applicable

1.2.   BAT conclusions for the alkylation process

1.2.1.   Hydrofluoric acid alkylation process

| BAT 19. | In order to prevent hydrofluoric acid (HF) emissions to air from the hydrofluoric acid alkylation process, BAT is to use wet scrubbing with alkaline solution to treat incondensable gas streams prior to venting to flare. |
| --- | --- |

BAT 19.

Description

See Section 1.20.3.

Applicability:

The technique is generally applicable. Safety requirements, due to the hazardous nature of hydrofluoric acid, are to be considered

| BAT 20. | In order to reduce emissions to water from the hydrofluoric acid alkylation process, BAT is to use a combination of the techniques given below.







  Technique | Description | Applicability |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| (i) | Precipitation/Neutralisation step |

BAT 20.

Technique

Description

Applicability

(i)

Precipitation/Neutralisation step

Precipitation (with, e.g. calcium or aluminium-based additives) or neutralisation (where the effluent is indirectly neutralised with potassium hydroxide (KOH))

Generally applicable.

Safety requirements due to the hazardous nature of hydrofluoric acid (HF) are to be considered

| (ii) | Separation step |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

Separation step

The insoluble compounds produced at the first step (e.g. CaF2 or AlF3) are separated in e.g. a settlement basin

Generally applicable

1.2.2.   Sulphuric acid alkylation process

| BAT 21. | In order to reduce the emissions to water from the sulphuric acid alkylation process, BAT is to reduce the use of sulphuric acid by regenerating the spent acid and to neutralise the waste water generated by this process before routing to waste water treatment. |
| --- | --- |

BAT 21.

1.3.   BAT conclusions for base oil production processes

| BAT 22. | In order to prevent and reduce the emissions of hazardous substances to air and water from base oil production processes, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.







  Technique | Description | Applicability |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| (i) | Closed process with a solvent recovery |

BAT 22.

Technique

Description

Applicability

(i)

Closed process with a solvent recovery

Process where the solvent, after being used during base oil manufacturing (e.g. in extraction, dewaxing units), is recovered through distillation and stripping steps.

See Section 1.20.7

Generally applicable

| (ii) | Multi-effect extraction solvent-based process |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

Multi-effect extraction solvent-based process

Solvent extraction process including several stages of evaporation (e.g. double or triple effect) for a lower loss of containment

Generally applicable to new units.

The use of a triple effect process may be restricted to non-fouling feed stocks

| (iii) | Extraction unit processes using less hazardous substances |
| --- | --- |

(iii)

Extraction unit processes using less hazardous substances

Design (new plants) or implement changes (into existing) so that the plant operates a solvent extraction process with the use of a less hazardous solvent: e.g. converting furfural or phenol extraction into the n-methylpyrrolidone (NMP) process

Generally applicable to new units.

Converting existing units to another solvent-based process with different physico-chemical properties may require substantial modifications

| (iv) | Catalytic processes based on hydrogenation |
| --- | --- |

(iv)

Catalytic processes based on hydrogenation

Processes based on conversion of undesired compounds via catalytic hydrogenation similar to hydrotreatment.

See Section 1.20.3 (Hydrotreatment)

Generally applicable to new units

1.4.   BAT conclusions for the bitumen production process

| BAT 23. | In order to prevent and reduce emissions to air from the bitumen production process, BAT is to treat the gaseous overhead by using one of the techniques given below.







  Technique | Description | Applicability |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| (i) | Thermal oxidation of gaseous overhead over 800 °C |

BAT 23.

Technique

Description

Applicability

(i)

Thermal oxidation of gaseous overhead over 800 °C

See Section 1.20.6

Generally applicable for the bitumen blowing unit

| (ii) | Wet scrubbing of gaseous overhead |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

Wet scrubbing of gaseous overhead

See Section 1.20.3

Generally applicable for the bitumen blowing unit

1.5.   BAT conclusions for the fluid catalytic cracking process

| BAT 24. | In order to prevent or reduce NOX emissions to air from the catalytic cracking process (regenerator), BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below. |
| --- | --- |

BAT 24.

| I. | Primary or process-related techniques, such as:







  Technique | Description | Applicability |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Process optimisation and use of promoters or additives |
| (i) | Process optimisation |

I.

Technique

Description

Applicability

Process optimisation and use of promoters or additives

(i)

Process optimisation

Combination of operating conditions or practices aimed at reducing NOX formation, e.g. lowering the excess oxygen in the flue-gas in full combustion mode, air staging of the CO boiler in partial combustion mode, provided that the CO boiler is appropriately designed

Generally applicable

| (ii) | Low-NOX CO oxidation promoters |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

Low-NOX CO oxidation promoters

Use of a substance that selectively promotes the combustion of CO only and prevents the oxidation of the nitrogen that contains intermediates to NOX: e.g. non-platinum promoters

Applicable only in full combustion mode for the substitution of platinum-based CO promoters.

Appropriate distribution of air in the regenerator may be required to obtain the maximum benefit

| (iii) | Specific additives for NOX reduction |
| --- | --- |

(iii)

Specific additives for NOX reduction

Use of specific catalytic additives for enhancing the reduction of NO by CO

Applicable only in full combustion mode in an appropriate design and with achievable oxygen excess. The applicability of copper-based NOX reduction additives may be limited by the gas compressor capacity

| II. | Secondary or end-of-pipe techniques, such as:







  Technique | Description | Applicability |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| (i) | Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) |

II.

Technique

Description

Applicability

(i)

Selective catalytic reduction (SCR)

See Section 1.20.2

To avoid potential fouling downstream, additional filtering might be required upstream of the SCR.

For existing units, the applicability may be limited by space availability

| (ii) | Selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR) |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

Selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR)

See Section 1.20.2

For partial combustion FCCs with CO boilers, a sufficient residence time at the appropriate temperature is required.

For full combustion FCCs without auxiliary boilers, additional fuel injection (e.g. hydrogen) may be required to match a lower temperature window

| (iii) | Low temperature oxidation |
| --- | --- |

(iii)

Low temperature oxidation

See Section 1.20.2

Need for additional scrubbing capacity.

Ozone generation and the associated risk management need to be properly addressed. The applicability may be limited by the need for additional waste water treatment and related cross-media effects (e.g. nitrate emissions) and by an insufficient supply of liquid oxygen (for ozone generation).

The applicability of the technique may be limited by space availability

BAT-associated emission levels: See Table 4.

Table 4

BAT-associated emission levels for NOX emissions to air from the regenerator in the catalytic cracking process

| Parameter | Type of unit/combustion mode | BAT-AEL
  (monthly average)
  mg/Nm3 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| NOX, expressed as NO2 | New unit/all combustion mode | < 30-100 |
| Existing unit/full combustion mode | < 100-300 (19) |
| Existing unit/partial combustion mode | 100-400 (19) |

Parameter

Type of unit/combustion mode

BAT-AEL

(monthly average)

mg/Nm3

NOX, expressed as NO2

New unit/all combustion mode

< 30-100

Existing unit/full combustion mode

< 100-300 (19)

Existing unit/partial combustion mode

100-400 (19)

The associated monitoring is in BAT 4.

| BAT 25. | In order to reduce dust and metals emissions to air from the catalytic cracking process (regenerator), BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below. |
| --- | --- |

BAT 25.

| I. | Primary or process-related techniques, such as:







  Technique | Description | Applicability |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| (i) | Use of an attrition-resistant catalyst |

I.

Technique

Description

Applicability

(i)

Use of an attrition-resistant catalyst

Selection of catalyst substance that is able to resist abrasion and fragmentation in order to reduce dust emissions

Generally applicable provided the activity and selectivity of the catalyst are sufficient

| (ii) | Use of low sulphur feedstock (e.g. by feedstock selection or by hydrotreatment of feed) |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

Use of low sulphur feedstock (e.g. by feedstock selection or by hydrotreatment of feed)

Feedstock selection favours low sulphur feedstocks among the possible sources to be processed at the unit.

Hydrotreatment aims at reducing the sulphur, nitrogen and metal contents of the feed.

See Section 1.20.3

Requires sufficient availability of low sulphur feedstocks, hydrogen production and hydrogen sulphide (H2S) treatment capacity (e.g. amine and Claus units)

| II. | Secondary or end-of-pipe techniques, such as:







  Technique | Description | Applicability |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| (i) | Electrostatic precipitator (ESP) |

II.

Technique

Description

Applicability

(i)

Electrostatic precipitator (ESP)

See Section 1.20.1

For existing units, the applicability may be limited by space availability

| (ii) | Multistage cyclone separators |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

Multistage cyclone separators

See Section 1.20.1

Generally applicable

| (iii) | Third stage blowback filter |
| --- | --- |

(iii)

Third stage blowback filter

See Section 1.20.1

Applicability may be restricted

| (iv) | Wet scrubbing |
| --- | --- |

(iv)

Wet scrubbing

See Section 1.20.3

The applicability may be limited in arid areas and in the case where the by-products from treatment (including e.g. waste water with high level of salts) cannot be reused or appropriately disposed of.

For existing units, the applicability may be limited by space availability

BAT-associated emission levels: See Table 5.

Table 5

BAT-associated emission levels for dust emissions to air from the regenerator in the catalytic cracking process

| Parameter | Type of unit | BAT-AEL (monthly average) (20)

  mg/Nm3 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Dust | New unit | 10-25 |
| Existing unit | 10-50 (21) |

Parameter

Type of unit

BAT-AEL (monthly average) (20)

mg/Nm3

Dust

New unit

10-25

Existing unit

10-50 (21)

The associated monitoring is in BAT 4.

| BAT 26. | In order to prevent or reduce SOX emissions to air from the catalytic cracking process (regenerator), BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below. |
| --- | --- |

BAT 26.

| I. | Primary or process-related techniques, such as:







  Technique | Description | Applicability |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| (i) | Use of SOX reducing catalyst additives |

I.

Technique

Description

Applicability

(i)

Use of SOX reducing catalyst additives

Use of a substance that transfers the sulphur associated with coke from the regenerator back to the reactor.

See description in 1.20.3

Applicability may be restricted by regenerator conditions design.

Requires appropriate hydrogen sulphide abatement capacity (e.g. SRU)

| (ii) | Use of low sulphur feedstock (e.g. by feedstock selection or by hydrotreatment of the feed) |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

Use of low sulphur feedstock (e.g. by feedstock selection or by hydrotreatment of the feed)

Feedstock selection favours low sulphur feedstocks among the possible sources to be processed at the unit.

Hydrotreatment aims at reducing the sulphur, nitrogen and metal contents of the feed.

See description in 1.20.3

Requires sufficient availability of low sulphur feedstocks, hydrogen production and hydrogen sulphide (H2S) treatment capacity (e.g. amine and Claus units)

| II. | Secondary or end-of-pipe techniques, such as:







  Techniques | Description | Applicability |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| (i) | Non-regenerative scrubbing |

II.

Techniques

Description

Applicability

(i)

Non-regenerative scrubbing

Wet scrubbing or seawater scrubbing.

See Section 1.20.3

The applicability may be limited in arid areas and in the case where the by-products from treatment (including e.g. waste water with high level of salts) cannot be reused or appropriately disposed of.

For existing units, the applicability may be limited by space availability

| (ii) | Regenerative scrubbing |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

Regenerative scrubbing

Use of a specific SOX absorbing reagent (e.g. absorbing solution) which generally enables the recovery of sulphur as a by-product during a regenerating cycle where the reagent is reused.

See Section 1.20.3

The applicability is limited to the case where regenerated by-products can be sold.

For existing units, the applicability may be limited by the existing sulphur recovery capacity as well as by space availability

BAT-associated emission levels: See Table 6.

Table 6

BAT-associated emission levels for SO2 emissions to air from the regenerator in the catalytic cracking process

| Parameter | Type of units/mode | BAT-AEL
  (monthly average)
  mg/Nm3 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| SO2 | New units | ≤ 300 |
| Existing units/full combustion | < 100-800 (22) |
| Existing units/partial combustion | 100-1 200  (22) |

Parameter

Type of units/mode

BAT-AEL

(monthly average)

mg/Nm3

SO2

New units

≤ 300

Existing units/full combustion

< 100-800 (22)

Existing units/partial combustion

100-1 200  (22)

The associated monitoring is in BAT 4.

| BAT 27. | In order to reduce carbon monoxide (CO) emissions to air from the catalytic cracking process (regenerator), BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.







  Technique | Description | Applicability |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| (i) | Combustion operation control |

BAT 27.

Technique

Description

Applicability

(i)

Combustion operation control

See Section 1.20.5

Generally applicable

| (ii) | Catalysts with carbon monoxide (CO) oxidation promoters |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

Catalysts with carbon monoxide (CO) oxidation promoters

See Section 1.20.5

Generally applicable only for full combustion mode

| (iii) | Carbon monoxide (CO) boiler |
| --- | --- |

(iii)

Carbon monoxide (CO) boiler

See Section 1.20.5

Generally applicable only for partial combustion mode

BAT-associated emission levels: See Table 7.

Table 7

BAT-associated emission levels for carbon monoxide emissions to air from the regenerator in the catalytic cracking process for partial combustion mode

| Parameter | Combustion mode | BAT-AEL
  (monthly average)
  mg/Nm3 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Carbon monoxide, expressed as CO | Partial combustion mode | ≤ 100 (23) |

Parameter

Combustion mode

BAT-AEL

(monthly average)

mg/Nm3

Carbon monoxide, expressed as CO

Partial combustion mode

≤ 100 (23)

The associated monitoring is in BAT 4.

1.6.   BAT conclusions for the catalytic reforming process

| BAT 28. | In order to reduce emissions of polychlorinated dibenzodioxins/furans (PCDD/F) to air from the catalytic reforming unit, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.







  Technique | Description | Applicability |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| (i) | Choice of the catalyst promoter |

BAT 28.

Technique

Description

Applicability

(i)

Choice of the catalyst promoter

Use of catalyst promoter in order to minimise polychlorinated dibenzodioxins/furans (PCDD/F) formation during regeneration.

See Section 1.20.7

Generally applicable

Treatment of the regeneration flue-gas

| a. | Regeneration gas recycling loop with adsorption bed |
| --- | --- |

a.

Regeneration gas recycling loop with adsorption bed

Waste gas from the regeneration step is treated to remove chlorinated compounds (e.g. dioxins)

Generally applicable to new units.

For existing units the applicability may depend on the current regeneration unit design

| b. | Wet scrubbing |
| --- | --- |

b.

Wet scrubbing

See Section 1.20.3

Not applicable to semi-regenerative reformers

| c. | Electrostatic precipitator (ESP) |
| --- | --- |

c.

Electrostatic precipitator (ESP)

See Section 1.20.1

Not applicable to semi-regenerative reformers

1.7.   BAT conclusions for the coking processes

| BAT 29. | In order to reduce emissions to air from the coking production processes, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below:
  Primary or process-related techniques, such as:







  Technique | Description | Applicability |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| (i) | Collection and recycling of coke fines |

BAT 29.

Primary or process-related techniques, such as:

Technique

Description

Applicability

(i)

Collection and recycling of coke fines

Systematic collection and recycling of coke fines generated during the whole coking process (drilling, handling, crushing, cooling, etc.)

Generally applicable

| (ii) | Handling and storage of coke according to BAT 3 |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

Handling and storage of coke according to BAT 3

See BAT 3

Generally applicable

| (iii) | Use of a closed blowdown system |
| --- | --- |

(iii)

Use of a closed blowdown system

Arrestment system for pressure relief from the coke drums

Generally applicable

| (iv) | Recovery of gas (including the venting prior to the drum being opened to atmosphere) as a component of refinery fuel gas (RFG) |
| --- | --- |

(iv)

Recovery of gas (including the venting prior to the drum being opened to atmosphere) as a component of refinery fuel gas (RFG)

Carrying venting from the coke drum to the gas compressor to recover as RFG, rather than flaring.

For the flexicoking process, a conversion step (to convert the carbonyl sulphide (COS) into H2S) is needed prior to treating the gas from the coking unit

For existing units, the applicability of the techniques may be limited by space availability

| BAT 30. | In order to reduce NOX emissions to air from the calcining of green coke process, BAT is to use selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR). |
| --- | --- |

BAT 30.

Description

See Section 1.20.2.

Applicability

The applicability of the SNCR technique (especially with respect to residence time and temperature window) may be restricted due to the specificity of the calcining process.

| BAT 31. | In order to reduce SOX emissions to air from the calcining of green coke process, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.







  Technique | Description | Applicability |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| (i) | Non-regenerative scrubbing |

BAT 31.

Technique

Description

Applicability

(i)

Non-regenerative scrubbing

Wet scrubbing or seawater scrubbing.

See Section 1.20.3

The applicability may be limited in arid areas and in the case where the by-products from treatment (including e.g. waste water with high level of salts) cannot be reused or appropriately disposed of.

For existing units, the applicability may be limited by space availability

| (ii) | Regenerative scrubbing |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

Regenerative scrubbing

Use of a specific SOX absorbing reagent (e.g. absorbing solution) which generally enables the recovery of sulphur as a by-product during a regenerating cycle where the reagent is reused.

See Section 1.20.3

The applicability is limited to the case where regenerated by-products can be sold.

For existing units, the applicability may be limited by the existing sulphur recovery capacity as well as by space availability

| BAT 32. | In order to reduce dust emissions to air from the calcining of green coke process, BAT is to use a combination of the techniques given below.







  Technique | Description | Applicability |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| (i) | Electrostatic precipitator (ESP) |

BAT 32.

Technique

Description

Applicability

(i)

Electrostatic precipitator (ESP)

See Section 1.20.1

For existing units, the applicability may be limited by space availability.

For graphite and anode coke calcining production, the applicability may be restricted due to the high resistivity of the coke particles

| (ii) | Multistage cyclone separators |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

Multistage cyclone separators

See Section 1.20.1

Generally applicable

BAT-associated emission levels: See Table 8

Table 8

BAT-associated emission levels for dust emissions to air from a unit for the calcining of green coke

| Parameter | BAT-AEL
  (monthly average)
  mg/Nm3 |
| --- | --- |
| Dust | 10-50 (24)
   (25) |

Parameter

BAT-AEL

(monthly average)

mg/Nm3

Dust

10-50 (24)
   (25)

The associated monitoring is in BAT 4.

1.8.   BAT conclusions for the desalting process

| BAT 33. | In order to reduce water consumption and emissions to water from the desalting process, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.







  Technique | Description | Applicability |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| (i) | Recycling water and optimisation of the desalting process |

BAT 33.

Technique

Description

Applicability

(i)

Recycling water and optimisation of the desalting process

An ensemble of good desalting practices aiming at increasing the efficiency of the desalter and reducing wash water usage e.g. using low shear mixing devices, low water pressure. It includes the management of key parameters for washing (e.g. good mixing) and separation (e.g. pH, density, viscosity, electric field potential for coalescence) steps

Generally applicable

| (ii) | Multistage desalter |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

Multistage desalter

Multistage desalters operate with water addition and dehydration, repeated through two stages or more for achieving a better efficiency in the separation and therefore less corrosion in further processes

Applicable for new units

| (iii) | Additional separation step |
| --- | --- |

(iii)

Additional separation step

An additional enhanced oil/water and solid/water separation designed for reducing the charge of oil to the waste water treatment plant and recycling it to the process. This includes, e.g. settling drum, the use of optimum interface level controllers

Generally applicable

1.9.   BAT conclusions for the combustion units

| BAT 34. | In order to prevent or reduce NOX emissions to air from the combustion units, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below. |
| --- | --- |

BAT 34.

| I. | Primary or process-related techniques, such as:







  Technique | Description | Applicability |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| (i)   Selection or treatment of fuel |
| (a) | Use of gas to replace liquid fuel |

I.

Technique

Description

Applicability

Selection or treatment of fuel

(a)

Use of gas to replace liquid fuel

Gas generally contains less nitrogen than liquid and its combustion leads to a lower level of NOX emissions.

See Section 1.20.3

The applicability may be limited by the constraints associated with the availability of low sulphur gas fuels, which may be impacted by the energy policy of the Member State

| (b) | Use of low nitrogen refinery fuel oil (RFO) e.g. by RFO selection or by hydrotreatment of RFO |
| --- | --- |

(b)

Use of low nitrogen refinery fuel oil (RFO) e.g. by RFO selection or by hydrotreatment of RFO

Refinery fuel oil selection favours low nitrogen liquid fuels among the possible sources to be used at the unit.

Hydrotreatment aims at reducing the sulphur, nitrogen and metal contents of the fuel.

See Section 1.20.3

Applicability is limited by the availability of low nitrogen liquid fuels, hydrogen production and hydrogen sulphide (H2S) treatment capacity (e.g. amine and Claus units)

Combustion modifications

| (a) | Staged combustion:






  — | air staging |
| --- | --- | --- |

(a)

Staged combustion:

—

air staging

| — | fuel staging |
| --- | --- |

—

fuel staging

See Section 1.20.2

Fuel staging for mixed or liquid firing may require a specific burner design

| (b) | Optimisation of combustion |
| --- | --- |

(b)

Optimisation of combustion

See Section 1.20.2

Generally applicable

| (c) | Flue-gas recirculation |
| --- | --- |

(c)

Flue-gas recirculation

See Section 1.20.2

Applicable through the use of specific burners with internal recirculation of the flue-gas.

The applicability may be restricted to retrofitting external flue-gas recirculation to units with a forced/induced draught mode of operation

| (d) | Diluent injection |
| --- | --- |

(d)

Diluent injection

See Section 1.20.2

Generally applicable for gas turbines where appropriate inert diluents are available

| (e) | Use of low-NOX burners (LNB) |
| --- | --- |

(e)

Use of low-NOX burners (LNB)

See Section 1.20.2

Generally applicable for new units taking into account, the fuel-specific limitation (e.g. for heavy oil).

For existing units, applicability may be restricted by the complexity caused by site-specific conditions e.g. furnaces design, surrounding devices.

In very specific cases, substantial modifications may be required.

The applicability may be restricted for furnaces in the delayed coking process, due to possible coke generation in the furnaces.

In gas turbines, the applicability is restricted to low hydrogen content fuels (generally < 10 %)

| II. | Secondary or end-of-pipe techniques, such as:







  Technique | Description | Applicability |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| (i) | Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) |

II.

Technique

Description

Applicability

(i)

Selective catalytic reduction (SCR)

See Section 1.20.2

Generally applicable for new units.

For existing units, the applicability may be constrained due to the requirements for significant space and optimal reactant injection

| (ii) | Selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR) |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

Selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR)

See Section 1.20.2

Generally applicable for new units.

For existing units, the applicability may be constrained by the requirement for the temperature window and the residence time to be reached by reactant injection

| (iii) | Low temperature oxidation |
| --- | --- |

(iii)

Low temperature oxidation

See Section 1.20.2

The applicability may be limited by the need for additional scrubbing capacity and by the fact that ozone generation and the associated risk management need to be properly addressed.

The applicability may be limited by the need for additional waste water treatment and related cross-media effects (e.g. nitrate emissions) and by an insufficient supply of liquid oxygen (for ozone generation).

For existing units, the applicability of the technique may be limited by space availability

| (iv) | SNOX combined technique |
| --- | --- |

(iv)

SNOX combined technique

See Section 1.20.4

Applicable only for high flue-gas (e.g. > 800 000 Nm3/h) flow and when combined NOX and SOX abatement is needed

BAT-associated emission levels: See Table 9, Table 10 and Table 11.

Table 9

BAT-associated emission levels for NOX emissions to air from a gas turbine

| Parameter | Type of equipment | BAT-AEL (26)

  (monthly average)
  mg/Nm3 at 15 % O2 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| NOX expressed as NO2 | Gas turbine (including combined cycle gas turbine — CCGT) and integrated gasification combined cycle turbine (IGCC)) | 40-120
  (existing turbine) |
| 20-50
  (new turbine) (27) |

Parameter

Type of equipment

BAT-AEL (26)

(monthly average)

mg/Nm3 at 15 % O2

NOX expressed as NO2

Gas turbine (including combined cycle gas turbine — CCGT) and integrated gasification combined cycle turbine (IGCC))

40-120

(existing turbine)

20-50

(new turbine) (27)

The associated monitoring is in BAT 4.

Table 10

BAT-associated emission levels for NOX emissions to air from a gas-fired combustion unit, with the exception of gas turbines

| Parameter | Type of combustion | BAT-AEL
  (monthly average)
  mg/Nm3 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| NOX expressed as NO2 | Gas firing | 30-150
  for existing unit (28) |
| 30-100
  for new unit |

Parameter

Type of combustion

BAT-AEL

(monthly average)

mg/Nm3

NOX expressed as NO2

Gas firing

30-150

for existing unit (28)

30-100

for new unit

The associated monitoring is in BAT 4.

Table 11

BAT-associated emission levels for NOX emissions to air from a multi-fuel fired combustion unit with the exception of gas turbines

| Parameter | Type of combustion | BAT-AEL
  (monthly average)
  mg/Nm3 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| NOX expressed as NO2 | Multi-fuel fired combustion unit | 30-300
  for existing unit (29)
   (30) |

Parameter

Type of combustion

BAT-AEL

(monthly average)

mg/Nm3

NOX expressed as NO2

Multi-fuel fired combustion unit

30-300

for existing unit (29)
   (30)

The associated monitoring is in BAT 4.

| BAT 35. | In order to prevent or reduce dust and metal emissions to air from the combustion units, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below. |
| --- | --- |

BAT 35.

| I. | Primary or process-related techniques, such as:







  Technique | Description | Applicability |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| (i)   Selection or treatment of fuel |
| (a) | Use of gas to replace liquid fuel |

I.

Technique

Description

Applicability

Selection or treatment of fuel

(a)

Use of gas to replace liquid fuel

Gas instead of liquid combustion leads to lower level of dust emissions

See Section 1.20.3

The applicability may be limited by the constraints associated with the availability of low sulphur fuels such as natural gas, which may be impacted by the energy policy of the Member State

| (b) | Use of low sulphur refinery fuel oil (RFO) e.g. by RFO selection or by hydrotreatment of RFO |
| --- | --- |

(b)

Use of low sulphur refinery fuel oil (RFO) e.g. by RFO selection or by hydrotreatment of RFO

Refinery fuel oil selection favours low sulphur liquid fuels among the possible sources to be used at the unit.

Hydrotreatment aims at reducing the sulphur, nitrogen and metal contents of the fuel.

See Section 1.20.3

The applicability may be limited by the availability of low sulphur liquid fuels, hydrogen production and the hydrogen sulphide (H2S) treatment capacity (e.g. amine and Claus units)

Combustion modifications

| (a) | Optimisation of combustion |
| --- | --- |

(a)

Optimisation of combustion

See Section 1.20.2

Generally applicable to all types of combustion

| (b) | Atomisation of liquid fuel |
| --- | --- |

(b)

Atomisation of liquid fuel

Use of high pressure to reduce the droplet size of liquid fuel.

Recent optimal burner designs generally include steam atomisation

Generally applicable to liquid fuel firing

| II. | Secondary or end-of-pipe techniques, such as:







  Technique | Description | Applicability |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| (i) | Electrostatic precipitator (ESP) |

II.

Technique

Description

Applicability

(i)

Electrostatic precipitator (ESP)

See Section 1.20.1

For existing units, the applicability may be limited by space availability

| (ii) | Third stage blowback filter |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

Third stage blowback filter

See Section 1.20.1

Generally applicable

| (iii) | Wet scrubbing |
| --- | --- |

(iii)

Wet scrubbing

See Section 1.20.3

The applicability may be limited in arid areas and in the case where the by-products from treatment (including e.g. waste water with a high level of salt) cannot be reused or appropriately disposed of. For existing units, the applicability of the technique may be limited by space availability

| (iv) | Centrifugal washers |
| --- | --- |

(iv)

Centrifugal washers

See Section 1.20.1

Generally applicable

BAT-associated emission levels: See Table 12.

Table 12

BAT-associated emission levels for dust emissions to air from a multi-fuel fired combustion unit with the exception of gas turbines

| Parameter | Type of combustion | BAT-AEL
  (monthly average)
  mg/Nm3 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Dust | Multi-fuel firing | 5-50
  for existing unit (31)
   (32) |
| 5-25
  for new unit < 50 MW |

Parameter

Type of combustion

BAT-AEL

(monthly average)

mg/Nm3

Dust

Multi-fuel firing

5-50

for existing unit (31)
   (32)

5-25

for new unit < 50 MW

The associated monitoring is in BAT 4.

| BAT 36. | In order to prevent or reduce SOX emissions to air from the combustion units, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below. |
| --- | --- |

BAT 36.

| I. | Primary or process-related techniques based on a selection or a treatment of the fuel, such as:







  Technique | Description | Applicability |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| (i) | Use of gas to replace liquid fuel |

I.

Technique

Description

Applicability

(i)

Use of gas to replace liquid fuel

See Section 1.20.3

The applicability may be limited by the constraints associated with the availability of low sulphur fuels such as natural gas, which may be impacted by the energy policy of the Member State

| (ii) | Treatment of refinery fuel gas (RFG) |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

Treatment of refinery fuel gas (RFG)

Residual H2S concentration in RFG depends on the treatment process parameter, e.g. the amine-scrubbing pressure.

See Section 1.20.3

For low calorific gas containing carbonyl sulphide (COS) e.g. from coking units, a converter may be required prior to H2S removal

| (iii) | Use of low sulphur refinery fuel oil (RFO) e.g. by RFO selection or by hydrotreatment of RFO |
| --- | --- |

(iii)

Use of low sulphur refinery fuel oil (RFO) e.g. by RFO selection or by hydrotreatment of RFO

Refinery fuel oil selection favours low sulphur liquid fuels among the possible sources to be used at the unit.

Hydrotreatment aims at reducing the sulphur, nitrogen and metal contents of the fuel.

See Section 1.20.3

The applicability is limited by the availability of low sulphur liquid fuels, hydrogen production and the hydrogen sulphide (H2S) treatment capacity (e.g. amine and Claus units)

| II. | Secondary or end-of-pipe techniques:







  Technique | Description | Applicability |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| (i) | Non-regenerative scrubbing |

II.

Technique

Description

Applicability

(i)

Non-regenerative scrubbing

Wet scrubbing or seawater scrubbing.

See Section 1.20.3

The applicability may be limited in arid areas and in the case where the by-products from treatment (including e.g. waste water with high level of salts) cannot be reused or appropriately disposed of.

For existing units, the applicability of the technique may be limited by space availability

| (ii) | Regenerative scrubbing |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

Regenerative scrubbing

Use of a specific SOX absorbing reagent (e.g. absorbing solution) which generally enables the recovery of sulphur as a by-product during a regenerating cycle where the reagent is reused.

See Section 1.20.3

The applicability is limited to the case where regenerated by-products can be sold.

Retrofitting to existing units may be limited by the existing sulphur recovery capacity.

For existing units, the applicability of the technique may be limited by space availability

| (iii) | SNOX combined technique |
| --- | --- |

(iii)

SNOX combined technique

See Section 1.20.4

Applicable only for high flue-gas (e.g. > 800 000 Nm3/h) flow and when combined NOX and SOX abatement is required

BAT-associated emission levels: See Table 13 and Table 14.

Table 13

BAT-associated emission levels for SO2 emissions to air from a combustion unit firing refinery fuel gas (RFG), with the exception of gas turbines

| Parameter | BAT-AEL
  (monthly average)
  mg/Nm3 |
| --- | --- |
| SO2 | 5-35 (33) |

Parameter

BAT-AEL

(monthly average)

mg/Nm3

SO2

5-35 (33)

The associated monitoring is in BAT 4.

Table 14

BAT-associated emission levels for SO2 emissions to air from multi-fuel fired combustion units, with the exception of gas turbines and stationary gas engines

This BAT-AEL refers to the weighted average emissions from existing multi-fuel fired combustion units within the refinery, with the exception of gas turbines and stationary gas engines.

| Parameter | BAT-AEL
  (monthly average)
  mg/Nm3 |
| --- | --- |
| SO2 | 35-600 |

Parameter

BAT-AEL

(monthly average)

mg/Nm3

SO2

35-600

The associated monitoring is in BAT 4.

| BAT 37. | In order to reduce carbon monoxide (CO) emissions to air from the combustion units, BAT is to use a combustion operation control. |
| --- | --- |

BAT 37.

Description

See Section 1.20.5.

BAT-associated emission levels: See Table 15.

Table 15

BAT-associated emission levels for carbon monoxide emissions to air from a combustion unit

| Parameter | BAT-AEL
  (monthly average)
  mg/Nm3 |
| --- | --- |
| Carbon monoxide, expressed as CO | ≤ 100 |

Parameter

BAT-AEL

(monthly average)

mg/Nm3

Carbon monoxide, expressed as CO

≤ 100

The associated monitoring is in BAT 4.

1.10.   BAT conclusions for the etherification process

| BAT 38. | In order to reduce emissions to air from the etherification process, BAT is to ensure the appropriate treatment of process off-gases by routing them to the refinery fuel gas system. |
| --- | --- |

BAT 38.

| BAT 39. | In order to prevent upset of the biotreatment, BAT is to use a storage tank and an appropriate unit production plan management to control the toxic components dissolved content (e.g. methanol, formic acid, ethers) of the waste water stream prior to final treatment. |
| --- | --- |

BAT 39.

1.11.   BAT conclusions for the isomerisation process

| BAT 40. | In order to reduce emissions to air of chlorinated compounds, BAT is to optimise the use of chlorinated organic compounds used to maintain catalyst activity when such a process is in place or to use non-chlorinated catalytic systems. |
| --- | --- |

BAT 40.

1.12.   BAT conclusions for the natural gas refinery

| BAT 41. | In order to reduce sulphur dioxide emissions to air from the natural gas plant, BAT is to apply BAT 54. |
| --- | --- |

BAT 41.

| BAT 42. | In order to reduce nitrogen oxides (NOX) emissions to air from the natural gas plant, BAT is to apply BAT 34 |
| --- | --- |

BAT 42.

| BAT 43. | In order to prevent emissions of mercury when present in raw natural gas, BAT is to remove the mercury and recover the mercury-containing sludge for waste disposal. |
| --- | --- |

BAT 43.

1.13.   BAT conclusions for the distillation process

| BAT 44. | In order to prevent or reduce waste water flow generation from the distillation process, BAT is to use liquid ring vacuum pumps or surface condensers. |
| --- | --- |

BAT 44.

Applicability

May not be applicable in some retrofit cases. For new units, vacuum pumps, either in or not in combination with steam ejectors, may be needed to achieve a high vacuum (10 mm Hg). Also, a spare should be available in case the vacuum pump fails.

| BAT 45. | In order to prevent or reduce water pollution from the distillation process, BAT is to route sour water to the stripping unit. |
| --- | --- |

BAT 45.

| BAT 46. | In order to prevent or reduce emissions to air from distillation units, BAT is to ensure the appropriate treatment of process off-gases, especially incondensable off-gases, by acid gas removal prior to further use. |
| --- | --- |

BAT 46.

Applicability

Generally applicable for crude and vacuum distillation units. May not be applicable for stand-alone lubricant and bitumen refineries with emissions of less than 1 t/d of sulphur compounds. In specific refinery configurations, applicability may be restricted, due to the need for e.g. large piping, compressors or additional amine treating capacity.

1.14.   BAT conclusions for the products treatment process

| BAT 47. | In order to reduce emissions to air from the products treatment process, BAT is to ensure the appropriate disposal of off-gases, especially odorous spent air from sweetening units, by routing them to destruction, e.g. by incineration. |
| --- | --- |

BAT 47.

Applicability

Generally applicable to products treatment processes where the gas streams can be safely processed to the destruction units. May not be applicable to sweetening units, due to safety reasons.

| BAT 48. | In order to reduce waste and waste water generation when a products treatment process using caustic is in place, BAT is to use cascading caustic solution and a global management of spent caustic, including recycling after appropriate treatment, e.g. by stripping. |
| --- | --- |

BAT 48.

1.15.   BAT conclusions for storage and handling processes

| BAT 49. | In order to reduce VOC emissions to air from the storage of volatile liquid hydrocarbon compounds, BAT is to use floating roof storage tanks equipped with high efficiency seals or a fixed roof tank connected to a vapour recovery system. |
| --- | --- |

BAT 49.

Description

High efficiency seals are specific devices for limiting losses of vapour, e.g. improved primary seals, additional multiple (secondary or tertiary) seals (according to quantity emitted).

Applicability

The applicability of high efficiency seals may be restricted for retrofitting tertiary seals in existing tanks.

| BAT 50. | In order to reduce VOC emissions to air from the storage of volatile liquid hydrocarbon compounds, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.







  Technique | Description | Applicability |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| (i) | Manual crude oil tank cleaning |

BAT 50.

Technique

Description

Applicability

(i)

Manual crude oil tank cleaning

Oil tank cleaning is performed by workers entering the tank and removing sludge manually

Generally applicable

| (ii) | Use of a closed-loop system |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

Use of a closed-loop system

For internal inspections, tanks are periodically emptied, cleaned and rendered gas-free. This cleaning includes dissolving the tank bottom. Closed-loop systems that can be combined with end-of-pipe mobile abatement techniques prevent or reduce VOC emissions

The applicability may be limited by e.g. the type of residues, tank roof construction or tank materials

| BAT 51. | In order to prevent or reduce emissions to soil and groundwater from the storage of liquid hydrocarbon compounds, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.







  Technique | Description | Applicability |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| (i) | Maintenance programme including corrosion monitoring, prevention and control |

BAT 51.

Technique

Description

Applicability

(i)

Maintenance programme including corrosion monitoring, prevention and control

A management system including leak detection and operational controls to prevent overfilling, inventory control and risk-based inspection procedures on tanks at intervals to prove their integrity, and maintenance to improve tank containment. It also includes a system response to spill consequences to act before spills can reach the groundwater. To be especially reinforced during maintenance periods

Generally applicable

| (ii) | Double bottomed tanks |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

Double bottomed tanks

A second impervious bottom that provides a measure of protection against releases from the first material

Generally applicable for new tanks and after overhaul of existing tanks (34)

| (iii) | Impervious membrane liners |
| --- | --- |

(iii)

Impervious membrane liners

A continuous leak barrier under the entire bottom surface of the tank

Generally applicable for new tanks and after an overhaul of existing tanks (34)

| (iv) | Sufficient tank farm bund containment |
| --- | --- |

(iv)

Sufficient tank farm bund containment

A tank farm bund is designed to contain large spills potentially caused by a shell rupture or overfilling (for both environmental and safety reasons). Size and associated building rules are generally defined by local regulations

Generally applicable

| BAT 52. | In order to prevent or reduce VOC emissions to air from loading and unloading operations of volatile liquid hydrocarbon compounds, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below to achieve a recovery rate of at least 95 %.







  Technique | Description | Applicability (35) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Vapour recovery by:






  (i) | Condensation |

BAT 52.

Technique

Description

Applicability (35)

Vapour recovery by:

(i)

Condensation

| (ii) | Absorption |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

Absorption

| (iii) | Adsorption |
| --- | --- |

(iii)

Adsorption

| (iv) | Membrane separation |
| --- | --- |

(iv)

Membrane separation

| (v) | Hybrid systems |
| --- | --- |

(v)

Hybrid systems

See Section 1.20.6

Generally applicable to loading/unloading operations where annual throughput is > 5 000 m3/yr. Not applicable to loading/unloading operations for sea-going vessels with an annual throughput < 1 million m3/yr

BAT-associated emission levels: See Table 16.

Table 16

BAT-associated emission levels for non-methane VOC and benzene emissions to air from loading and unloading operations of volatile liquid hydrocarbon compounds

| Parameter | BAT-AEL
  (hourly average) (36) |
| --- | --- |
| NMVOC | 0,15-10 g/Nm3
   (37)
   (38) |
| Benzene (38) | < 1 mg/Nm3 |

Parameter

BAT-AEL

(hourly average) (36)

NMVOC

0,15-10 g/Nm3
   (37)
   (38)

Benzene (38)

< 1 mg/Nm3

1.16.   BAT conclusions for visbreaking and other thermal processes

| BAT 53. | In order to reduce emissions to water from visbreaking and other thermal processes, BAT is to ensure the appropriate treatment of waste water streams by applying the techniques of BAT 11. |
| --- | --- |

BAT 53.

1.17.   BAT conclusions for waste gas sulphur treatment

| BAT 54. | In order to reduce sulphur emissions to air from off-gases containing hydrogen sulphides (H2S), BAT is to use all of the techniques given below.







  Technique | Description | Applicability (39) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| (i) | Acid gas removal e.g. by amine treating |

BAT 54.

Technique

Description

Applicability (39)

(i)

Acid gas removal e.g. by amine treating

See Section 1.20.3

Generally applicable

| (ii) | Sulphur recovery unit (SRU), e.g. by Claus process |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

Sulphur recovery unit (SRU), e.g. by Claus process

See Section 1.20.3

Generally applicable

| (iii) | Tail gas treatment unit (TGTU) |
| --- | --- |

(iii)

Tail gas treatment unit (TGTU)

See Section 1.20.3

For retrofitting existing SRU, the applicability may be limited by the SRU size and configuration of the units and the type of sulphur recovery process already in place

BAT-associated environmental performance levels (BAT-AEPL): See Table 17.

Table 17

BAT-associated environmental performance levels for a waste gas sulphur (H2S) recovery system

| | BAT-associated environmental performance level (monthly average) |
| --- | --- |
| Acid gas removal | Achieve hydrogen sulphides (H2S) removal in the treated RFG in order to meet gas firing BAT-AEL for BAT 36 |
| Sulphur recovery efficiency (40) | New unit: 99,5 – > 99,9 % |
| Existing unit: ≥ 98,5 % |

BAT-associated environmental performance level (monthly average)

Acid gas removal

Achieve hydrogen sulphides (H2S) removal in the treated RFG in order to meet gas firing BAT-AEL for BAT 36

Sulphur recovery efficiency (40)

New unit: 99,5 – > 99,9 %

Existing unit: ≥ 98,5 %

The associated monitoring is described in BAT 4.

1.18.   BAT conclusions for flares

| BAT 55. | In order to prevent emissions to air from flares, BAT is to use flaring only for safety reasons or for non-routine operational conditions (e.g. start-ups, shutdown). |
| --- | --- |

BAT 55.

| BAT 56. | In order to reduce emissions to air from flares when flaring is unavoidable, BAT is to use the techniques given below.







  Technique | Description | Applicability |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| (i) | Correct plant design |

BAT 56.

Technique

Description

Applicability

(i)

Correct plant design

See Section 1.20.7

Applicable to new units.

Flare gas recovery system may be retrofitted in existing units

| (ii) | Plant management |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

Plant management

See Section 1.20.7

Generally applicable

| (iii) | Correct flaring devices design |
| --- | --- |

(iii)

Correct flaring devices design

See Section 1.20.7

Applicable to new units

| (iv) | Monitoring and reporting |
| --- | --- |

(iv)

Monitoring and reporting

See Section 1.20.7

Generally applicable

1.19.   BAT conclusions for integrated emission management

| BAT 57. | In order to achieve an overall reduction of NOX emissions to air from combustion units and fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) units, BAT is to use an integrated emission management technique as an alternative to applying BAT 24 and BAT 34. |
| --- | --- |

BAT 57.

Description

The technique consists of managing NOX emissions from several or all combustion units and FCC units on a refinery site in an integrated manner, by implementing and operating the most appropriate combination of BAT across the different units concerned and monitoring the effectiveness thereof, in such a way that the resulting total emissions are equal to or lower than the emissions that would be achieved through a unit-by-unit application of the BAT-AELs referred to in BAT 24 and BAT 34.

This technique is especially suitable to oil refining sites:

| — | with a recognised site complexity, multiplicity of combustion and process units interlinked in terms of their feedstock and energy supply; |
| --- | --- |

—

with a recognised site complexity, multiplicity of combustion and process units interlinked in terms of their feedstock and energy supply;

| — | with frequent process adjustments required in function of the quality of the crude received; |
| --- | --- |

—

with frequent process adjustments required in function of the quality of the crude received;

| — | with a technical necessity to use a part of process residues as internal fuels, causing frequent adjustments of the fuel mix according to process requirements. |
| --- | --- |

—

with a technical necessity to use a part of process residues as internal fuels, causing frequent adjustments of the fuel mix according to process requirements.

BAT-associated emission levels: See Table 18.

In addition, for each new combustion unit or new FCC unit included in the integrated emission management system, the BAT-AELs set out under BAT 24 and BAT 34 remain applicable.

Table 18

BAT-associated emission levels for NOx emissions to air when applying BAT 57

The BAT-AEL for NOx emissions from the units concerned by BAT 57, expressed in mg/Nm3 as a monthly average value, is equal to or less than the weighted average of the NOx concentrations (expressed in mg/Nm3 as a monthly average) that would be achieved by applying in practice at each of those units techniques that would enable the units concerned to meet the following:

| (a) | for catalytic cracking process (regenerator) units: the BAT-AEL range set out in Table 4 (BAT 24); |
| --- | --- |

(a)

for catalytic cracking process (regenerator) units: the BAT-AEL range set out in Table 4 (BAT 24);

| (b) | for combustion units burning refinery fuels alone or simultaneously with other fuels: the BAT-AEL ranges set out in Tables 9, 10 and 11 (BAT 34). |
| --- | --- |

(b)

for combustion units burning refinery fuels alone or simultaneously with other fuels: the BAT-AEL ranges set out in Tables 9, 10 and 11 (BAT 34).

This BAT-AEL is expressed by the following formula:

Formula

Notes:

| 1. | The applicable reference conditions for oxygen are those specified in Table 1. |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | The weighing of the emission levels of the individual units is done on the basis of the flue-gas flow rate of the unit concerned, expressed as a monthly average value (Nm3/hour), which is representative for the normal operation of that unit within the refinery installation (applying the reference conditions under Note 1). |
| --- | --- |

2.

| 3. | In case of substantial and structural fuel changes which are affecting the applicable BAT-AEL for a unit or other substantial and structural changes in the nature or functioning of the units concerned, or in case of their replacement or extension or the addition of combustion units or FCC units, the BAT-AEL defined in Table 18 needs to be adjusted accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Monitoring associated with BAT 57

BAT for monitoring emissions of NOx under an integrated emission management technique is as in BAT 4, complemented with the following:

| — | a monitoring plan including a description of the processes monitored, a list of the emission sources and source streams (products, waste gases) monitored for each process and a description of the methodology (calculations, measurements) used and the underlying assumptions and associated level of confidence; |
| --- | --- |

—

a monitoring plan including a description of the processes monitored, a list of the emission sources and source streams (products, waste gases) monitored for each process and a description of the methodology (calculations, measurements) used and the underlying assumptions and associated level of confidence;

| — | continuous monitoring of the flue-gas flow rates of the units concerned, either through direct measurement or by an equivalent method; |
| --- | --- |

—

continuous monitoring of the flue-gas flow rates of the units concerned, either through direct measurement or by an equivalent method;

| — | a data management system for collecting, processing and reporting all monitoring data needed to determine the emissions from the sources covered by the integrated emission management technique. |
| --- | --- |

—

a data management system for collecting, processing and reporting all monitoring data needed to determine the emissions from the sources covered by the integrated emission management technique.

| BAT 58. | In order to achieve an overall reduction of SO2 emissions to air from combustion units, fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) units and waste gas sulphur recovery units, BAT is to use an integrated emission management technique as an alternative to applying BAT 26, BAT 36 and BAT 54. |
| --- | --- |

BAT 58.

Description

The technique consists of managing SO2 emissions from several or all combustion units, FCC units and waste gas sulphur recovery units on a refinery site in an integrated manner, by implementing and operating the most appropriate combination of BAT across the different units concerned and monitoring the effectiveness thereof, in such a way that the resulting total emissions are equal to or lower than the emissions that would be achieved through a unit-by-unit application of the BAT-AELs referred to in BAT 26 and BAT 36 as well as the BAT-AEPL set out under BAT 54.

This technique is especially suitable to oil refining sites:

| — | with a recognised site complexity, multiplicity of combustion and process units interlinked in terms of their feedstock and energy supply; |
| --- | --- |

—

with a recognised site complexity, multiplicity of combustion and process units interlinked in terms of their feedstock and energy supply;

| — | with frequent process adjustments required in function of the quality of the crude received; |
| --- | --- |

—

with frequent process adjustments required in function of the quality of the crude received;

| — | with a technical necessity to use a part of process residues as internal fuels, causing frequent adjustments of the fuel mix according to process requirements. |
| --- | --- |

—

with a technical necessity to use a part of process residues as internal fuels, causing frequent adjustments of the fuel mix according to process requirements.

BAT associated emission level: See Table 19.

In addition, for each new combustion unit, new FCC unit or new waste gas sulphur recovery unit included in the integrated emission management system, the BAT-AELs set out under BAT 26 and BAT 36 and the BAT-AEPL set out under BAT 54 remain applicable.

Table 19

BAT-associated emission levels for SO2 emissions to air when applying BAT 58

The BAT-AEL for SO2 emissions from the units concerned by BAT 58, expressed in mg/Nm3 as a monthly average value, is equal to or less than the weighted average of the SO2 concentrations (expressed in mg/Nm3 as a monthly average) that would be achieved by applying in practice at each of those units techniques that would enable the units concerned to meet the following:

| (a) | for catalytic cracking process (regenerator) units: the BAT-AEL ranges set out in Table 6 (BAT 26); |
| --- | --- |

(a)

for catalytic cracking process (regenerator) units: the BAT-AEL ranges set out in Table 6 (BAT 26);

| (b) | for combustion units burning refinery fuels alone or simultaneously with other fuels: the BAT-AEL ranges set out in Table 13 and in Table 14 (BAT 36); and |
| --- | --- |

(b)

for combustion units burning refinery fuels alone or simultaneously with other fuels: the BAT-AEL ranges set out in Table 13 and in Table 14 (BAT 36); and

| (c) | for waste gas sulphur recovery units: the BAT-AEPL ranges set out in Table 17 (BAT 54). |
| --- | --- |

(c)

for waste gas sulphur recovery units: the BAT-AEPL ranges set out in Table 17 (BAT 54).

This BAT-AEL is expressed by the following formula:

Formula

Notes:

| 1. | The applicable reference conditions for oxygen are those specified in Table 1. |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | The weighing of the emission levels of the individual units is done on the basis of the flue-gas flow rate of the unit concerned, expressed as the monthly average value (Nm3/hour), which is representative for the normal operation of that unit within the refinery installation (applying the reference conditions under Note 1). |
| --- | --- |

2.

| 3. | In case of substantial and structural fuel changes which are affecting the applicable BAT-AEL for a unit or other substantial and structural changes in the nature or functioning of the units concerned, or in case of their replacement, extension or the addition of combustion, FCC, or waste gas sulphur recovery units, the BAT-AEL defined in Table 19 needs to be adjusted accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Monitoring associated with BAT 58

BAT for monitoring emissions of SO2 under an integrated emission management approach is as in BAT 4, complemented with the following:

| — | a monitoring plan including a description of the processes monitored, a list of the emission sources and source streams (products, waste gases) monitored for each process and a description of the methodology (calculations, measurements) used and the underlying assumptions and associated level of confidence; |
| --- | --- |

—

a monitoring plan including a description of the processes monitored, a list of the emission sources and source streams (products, waste gases) monitored for each process and a description of the methodology (calculations, measurements) used and the underlying assumptions and associated level of confidence;

| — | continuous monitoring of the flue-gas flow rates of the units concerned, either through direct measurement or by an equivalent method; |
| --- | --- |

—

continuous monitoring of the flue-gas flow rates of the units concerned, either through direct measurement or by an equivalent method;

| — | a data management system for collecting, processing and reporting all monitoring data needed to determine the emissions from the sources covered by the integrated emission management technique. |
| --- | --- |

—

a data management system for collecting, processing and reporting all monitoring data needed to determine the emissions from the sources covered by the integrated emission management technique.

GLOSSARY

1.20.   Description of techniques for the prevention and control of emissions to air

1.20.1.   Dust

| Technique | Description |
| --- | --- |
| Electrostatic precipitator (ESP) | Electrostatic precipitators operate such that particles are charged and separated under the influence of an electrical field. Electrostatic precipitators are capable of operating under a wide range of conditions.
  Abatement efficiency may depend on the number of fields, residence time (size), catalyst properties and upstream particles removal devices.
  At FCC units, 3-field ESPs and 4-field ESPs are commonly used.
  ESPs may be used on a dry mode or with ammonia injection to improve the particle collection.
  For the calcining of green coke, the ESP capture efficiency may be reduced due to the difficulty for coke particles to be electrically charged |
| Multistage cyclone separators | Cyclonic collection device or system installed following the two stages of cyclones. Generally known as a third stage separator, common configuration consists of a single vessel containing many conventional cyclones or improved swirl-tube technology. For FCC, performance mainly depends on the particle concentration and size distribution of the catalyst fines downstream of the regenerator internal cyclones |
| Centrifugal washers | Centrifugal washers combine the cyclone principle and an intensive contact with water e.g. venturi washer |
| Third stage blowback filter | Reverse flow (blowback) ceramic or sintered metal filters where, after retention at the surface as a cake, the solids are dislodged by initiating a reverse flow. The dislodged solids are then purged from the filter system |

Technique

Description

Electrostatic precipitator (ESP)

Electrostatic precipitators operate such that particles are charged and separated under the influence of an electrical field. Electrostatic precipitators are capable of operating under a wide range of conditions.

Abatement efficiency may depend on the number of fields, residence time (size), catalyst properties and upstream particles removal devices.

At FCC units, 3-field ESPs and 4-field ESPs are commonly used.

ESPs may be used on a dry mode or with ammonia injection to improve the particle collection.

For the calcining of green coke, the ESP capture efficiency may be reduced due to the difficulty for coke particles to be electrically charged

Multistage cyclone separators

Cyclonic collection device or system installed following the two stages of cyclones. Generally known as a third stage separator, common configuration consists of a single vessel containing many conventional cyclones or improved swirl-tube technology. For FCC, performance mainly depends on the particle concentration and size distribution of the catalyst fines downstream of the regenerator internal cyclones

Centrifugal washers

Centrifugal washers combine the cyclone principle and an intensive contact with water e.g. venturi washer

Third stage blowback filter

Reverse flow (blowback) ceramic or sintered metal filters where, after retention at the surface as a cake, the solids are dislodged by initiating a reverse flow. The dislodged solids are then purged from the filter system

1.20.2.   Nitrogen oxides (NOX)

| Technique | Description |
| --- | --- |
| Combustion modifications |
| Staged combustion | — | Air staging — involves substoichiometric firing in a first step and the subsequent addition of the remaining air or oxygen into the furnace to complete combustion |

Technique

Description

Combustion modifications

Staged combustion

—

Air staging — involves substoichiometric firing in a first step and the subsequent addition of the remaining air or oxygen into the furnace to complete combustion

| — | Fuel staging — a low impulse primary flame is developed in the port neck; a secondary flame covers the root of the primary flame reducing its core temperature |
| --- | --- |

—

Fuel staging — a low impulse primary flame is developed in the port neck; a secondary flame covers the root of the primary flame reducing its core temperature

Flue-gas recirculation

Reinjection of waste gas from the furnace into the flame to reduce the oxygen content and therefore the temperature of the flame.

Special burners using the internal recirculation of combustion gases to cool the root of the flames and reduce the oxygen content in the hottest part of the flames

Use of low-NOX burners (LNB)

The technique (including ultra-low-NOX burners) is based on the principles of reducing peak flame temperatures, delaying but completing the combustion and increasing the heat transfer (increased emissivity of the flame). It may be associated with a modified design of the furnace combustion chamber. The design of ultra-low-NOX burners (ULNB) includes combustion staging (air/fuel) and flue-gas recirculation. Dry low-NOX burners (DLNB) are used for gas turbines

Optimisation of combustion

Based on permanent monitoring of appropriate combustion parameters (e.g. O2, CO content, fuel to air (or oxygen) ratio, unburnt components), the technique uses control technology for achieving the best combustion conditions

Diluent injection

Inert diluents, e.g. flue-gas, steam, water, nitrogen added to combustion equipment reduce the flame temperature and consequently the concentration of NOX in the flue-gases

Selective catalytic reduction (SCR)

The technique is based on the reduction of NOX to nitrogen in a catalytic bed by reaction with ammonia (in general aqueous solution) at an optimum operating temperature of around 300-450 °C.

One or two layers of catalyst may be applied. A higher NOX reduction is achieved with the use of higher amounts of catalyst (two layers)

Selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR)

The technique is based on the reduction of NOX to nitrogen by reaction with ammonia or urea at a high temperature.

The operating temperature window must be maintained between 900 °C and 1 050  °C for optimal reaction

Low temperature NOX oxidation

The low temperature oxidation process injects ozone into a flue-gas stream at optimal temperatures below 150 °C, to oxidise insoluble NO and NO2 to highly soluble N2O5. The N2O5 is removed in a wet scrubber by forming dilute nitric acid waste water that can be used in plant processes or neutralised for release and may need additional nitrogen removal

1.20.3.   Sulphur oxides (SOX)

| Technique | Description |
| --- | --- |
| Treatment of refinery fuel gas (RFG) | Some refinery fuel gases may be sulphur-free at source (e.g. from catalytic reforming and isomerisation processes) but most other processes produce sulphur-containing gases (e.g. off-gases from the visbreaker, hydrotreater or catalytic cracking units). These gas streams require an appropriate treatment for gas desulphurisation (e.g. by acid gas removal — see below — to remove H2S) before being released to the refinery fuel gas system |
| Refinery fuel oil (RFO) desulphurisation by hydrotreatment | In addition to selection of low-sulphur crude, fuel desulphurisation is achieved by the hydrotreatment process (see below) where hydrogenation reactions take place and lead to a reduction in sulphur content |
| Use of gas to replace liquid fuel | Decrease the use of liquid refinery fuel (generally heavy fuel oil containing sulphur, nitrogen, metals, etc.) by replacing it with on-site Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) or refinery fuel gas (RFG) or by externally supplied gaseous fuel (e.g. natural gas) with a low level of sulphur and other undesirable substances. At the individual combustion unit level, under multi-fuel firing, a minimum level of liquid firing is necessary to ensure flame stability |
| Use of SOX reducing catalysts additives | Use of a substance (e.g. metallic oxides catalyst) that transfers the sulphur associated with coke from the regenerator back to the reactor. It operates most efficiently in full combustion mode rather than in deep partial-combustion mode.
  NB: SOX reducing catalysts additives might have a detrimental effect on dust emissions by increasing catalyst losses due to attrition, and on NOX emissions by participating in CO promotion, together with the oxidation of SO2 to SO3 |
| Hydrotreatment | Based on hydrogenation reactions, hydrotreatment aims mainly at producing low-sulphur fuels (e.g. 10 ppm gasoline and diesel) and optimising the process configuration (heavy residue conversion and middle distillate production). It reduces the sulphur, nitrogen and metal content of the feed. As hydrogen is required, sufficient production capacity is needed. As the technique transfer sulphur from the feed to hydrogen sulphide (H2S) in the process gas, treatment capacity (e.g. amine and Claus units) is also a possible bottleneck |
| Acid gas removal e.g. by amine treating | Separation of acid gas (mainly hydrogen sulphide) from the fuel gases by dissolving it in a chemical solvent (absorption). The commonly used solvents are amines. This is generally the first step treatment needed before elemental sulphur can be recovered in the SRU |
| Sulphur recovery unit (SRU) | Specific unit that generally consists of a Claus process for sulphur removal of hydrogen sulphide (H2S)-rich gas streams from amine treating units and sour water strippers.
  SRU is generally followed by a tail gas treatment unit (TGTU) for remaining H2S removal |
| Tail gas treatment unit (TGTU) | A family of techniques, additional to the SRU in order to enhance the removal of sulphur compounds. They can be divided into four categories according to the principles applied:






  — | direct oxidation to sulphur |

Technique

Description

Treatment of refinery fuel gas (RFG)

Some refinery fuel gases may be sulphur-free at source (e.g. from catalytic reforming and isomerisation processes) but most other processes produce sulphur-containing gases (e.g. off-gases from the visbreaker, hydrotreater or catalytic cracking units). These gas streams require an appropriate treatment for gas desulphurisation (e.g. by acid gas removal — see below — to remove H2S) before being released to the refinery fuel gas system

Refinery fuel oil (RFO) desulphurisation by hydrotreatment

In addition to selection of low-sulphur crude, fuel desulphurisation is achieved by the hydrotreatment process (see below) where hydrogenation reactions take place and lead to a reduction in sulphur content

Use of gas to replace liquid fuel

Decrease the use of liquid refinery fuel (generally heavy fuel oil containing sulphur, nitrogen, metals, etc.) by replacing it with on-site Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) or refinery fuel gas (RFG) or by externally supplied gaseous fuel (e.g. natural gas) with a low level of sulphur and other undesirable substances. At the individual combustion unit level, under multi-fuel firing, a minimum level of liquid firing is necessary to ensure flame stability

Use of SOX reducing catalysts additives

Use of a substance (e.g. metallic oxides catalyst) that transfers the sulphur associated with coke from the regenerator back to the reactor. It operates most efficiently in full combustion mode rather than in deep partial-combustion mode.

NB: SOX reducing catalysts additives might have a detrimental effect on dust emissions by increasing catalyst losses due to attrition, and on NOX emissions by participating in CO promotion, together with the oxidation of SO2 to SO3

Hydrotreatment

Based on hydrogenation reactions, hydrotreatment aims mainly at producing low-sulphur fuels (e.g. 10 ppm gasoline and diesel) and optimising the process configuration (heavy residue conversion and middle distillate production). It reduces the sulphur, nitrogen and metal content of the feed. As hydrogen is required, sufficient production capacity is needed. As the technique transfer sulphur from the feed to hydrogen sulphide (H2S) in the process gas, treatment capacity (e.g. amine and Claus units) is also a possible bottleneck

Acid gas removal e.g. by amine treating

Separation of acid gas (mainly hydrogen sulphide) from the fuel gases by dissolving it in a chemical solvent (absorption). The commonly used solvents are amines. This is generally the first step treatment needed before elemental sulphur can be recovered in the SRU

Sulphur recovery unit (SRU)

Specific unit that generally consists of a Claus process for sulphur removal of hydrogen sulphide (H2S)-rich gas streams from amine treating units and sour water strippers.

SRU is generally followed by a tail gas treatment unit (TGTU) for remaining H2S removal

Tail gas treatment unit (TGTU)

A family of techniques, additional to the SRU in order to enhance the removal of sulphur compounds. They can be divided into four categories according to the principles applied:

—

direct oxidation to sulphur

| — | continuation of the Claus reaction (sub-dewpoint conditions) |
| --- | --- |

—

continuation of the Claus reaction (sub-dewpoint conditions)

| — | oxidation to SO2 and recovering sulphur from SO2 |
| --- | --- |

—

oxidation to SO2 and recovering sulphur from SO2

| — | reduction to H2S and recovery of sulphur from this H2S (e.g. amine process) |
| --- | --- |

—

reduction to H2S and recovery of sulphur from this H2S (e.g. amine process)

Wet scrubbing

In the wet scrubbing process, gaseous compounds are dissolved in a suitable liquid (water or alkaline solution). Simultaneous removal of solid and gaseous compounds may be achieved. Downstream of the wet scrubber, the flue-gases are saturated with water and a separation of the droplets is required before discharging the flue-gases. The resulting liquid has to be treated by a waste water process and the insoluble matter is collected by sedimentation or filtration

According to the type of scrubbing solution, it can be:

| — | a non-regenerative technique (e.g. sodium or magnesium-based) |
| --- | --- |

—

a non-regenerative technique (e.g. sodium or magnesium-based)

| — | a regenerative technique (e.g. amine or soda solution) |
| --- | --- |

—

a regenerative technique (e.g. amine or soda solution)

According to the contact method, the various techniques may require e.g.:

| — | Venturi using the energy from inlet gas by spraying it with the liquid |
| --- | --- |

—

Venturi using the energy from inlet gas by spraying it with the liquid

| — | packed towers, plate towers, spray chambers. |
| --- | --- |

—

packed towers, plate towers, spray chambers.

Where scrubbers are mainly intended for SOX removal, a suitable design is needed to also efficiently remove dust.

The typical indicative SOx removal efficiency is in the range 85-98 %.

Non-regenerative scrubbing

Sodium or magnesium-based solution is used as alkaline reagent to absorb SOX generally as sulphates. Techniques are based on e.g.:

| — | wet limestone |
| --- | --- |

—

wet limestone

| — | aqueous ammonia |
| --- | --- |

—

aqueous ammonia

| — | seawater (see infra) |
| --- | --- |

—

seawater (see infra)

Seawater scrubbing

A specific type of non-regenerative scrubbing using the alkalinity of the seawater as solvent. Generally requires an upstream abatement of dust

Regenerative scrubbing

Use of specific SOX absorbing reagent (e.g. absorbing solution) that generally enables the recovery of sulphur as a by-product during a regenerating cycle where the reagent is reused

1.20.4.   Combined techniques (SOx, NOx and dust)

| Technique | Description |
| --- | --- |
| Wet scrubbing | See Section 1.20.3 |
| SNOX combined technique | Combined technique to remove SOX, NOX and dust where a first dust removal stage (ESP) takes place followed by some specific catalytic processes. The sulphur compounds are recovered as commercial-grade concentrated sulphuric acid, while NOX is reduced to N2.
  Overall SOX removal is in the range: 94-96,6 %.
  Overall NOX removal is in the range: 87-90 % |

Technique

Description

Wet scrubbing

See Section 1.20.3

SNOX combined technique

Combined technique to remove SOX, NOX and dust where a first dust removal stage (ESP) takes place followed by some specific catalytic processes. The sulphur compounds are recovered as commercial-grade concentrated sulphuric acid, while NOX is reduced to N2.

Overall SOX removal is in the range: 94-96,6 %.

Overall NOX removal is in the range: 87-90 %

1.20.5.   Carbon monoxide (CO)

| Technique | Description |
| --- | --- |
| Combustion operation control | The increase in CO emissions due to the application of combustion modifications (primary techniques) for the reduction of NOX emissions can be limited by a careful control of the operational parameters |
| Catalysts with carbon monoxide (CO) oxidation promoters | Use of a substance which selectively promotes the oxidation of CO into CO2 (combustion) |
| Carbon monoxide (CO) boiler | Specific post-combustion device where CO present in the flue-gas is consumed downstream of the catalyst regenerator to recover the energy
  It is usually used only with partial-combustion FCC units |

Technique

Description

Combustion operation control

The increase in CO emissions due to the application of combustion modifications (primary techniques) for the reduction of NOX emissions can be limited by a careful control of the operational parameters

Catalysts with carbon monoxide (CO) oxidation promoters

Use of a substance which selectively promotes the oxidation of CO into CO2 (combustion)

Carbon monoxide (CO) boiler

Specific post-combustion device where CO present in the flue-gas is consumed downstream of the catalyst regenerator to recover the energy

It is usually used only with partial-combustion FCC units

1.20.6.   Volatile organic compounds (VOC)

| Vapour recovery | Volatile organic compounds emissions from loading and unloading operations of most volatile products, especially crude oil and lighter products, can be abated by various techniques e.g.:
  —   Absorption: the vapour molecules dissolve in a suitable absorption liquid (e.g. glycols or mineral oil fractions such as kerosene or reformate). The loaded scrubbing solution is desorbed by reheating in a further step. The desorbed gases must either be condensed, further processed, and incinerated or re-absorbed in an appropriate stream (e.g. of the product being recovered)
  —   Adsorption: the vapour molecules are retained by activate sites on the surface of adsorbent solid materials, e.g. activated carbon (AC) or zeolite. The adsorbent is periodically regenerated. The resulting desorbate is then absorbed in a circulating stream of the product being recovered in a downstream wash column. Residual gas from wash column is sent to further treatment
  —   Membrane gas separation: the vapour molecules are processed through selective membranes to separate the vapour/air mixture into a hydrocarbon-enriched phase (permeate), which is subsequently condensed or absorbed, and a hydrocarbon-depleted phase (retentate).
  —   Two-stage refrigeration/condensation: by cooling of the vapour/gas mixture the vapour molecules condense and are separated as a liquid. As the humidity leads to the icing-up of the heat exchanger, a two-stage condensation process providing for alternate operation is required.
  —   Hybrid systems: combinations of available techniques







  NB | Absorption and adsorption processes cannot notably reduce methane emissions. |
| --- | --- | --- |

Vapour recovery

Volatile organic compounds emissions from loading and unloading operations of most volatile products, especially crude oil and lighter products, can be abated by various techniques e.g.:

—   Absorption: the vapour molecules dissolve in a suitable absorption liquid (e.g. glycols or mineral oil fractions such as kerosene or reformate). The loaded scrubbing solution is desorbed by reheating in a further step. The desorbed gases must either be condensed, further processed, and incinerated or re-absorbed in an appropriate stream (e.g. of the product being recovered)

—   Adsorption: the vapour molecules are retained by activate sites on the surface of adsorbent solid materials, e.g. activated carbon (AC) or zeolite. The adsorbent is periodically regenerated. The resulting desorbate is then absorbed in a circulating stream of the product being recovered in a downstream wash column. Residual gas from wash column is sent to further treatment

—   Membrane gas separation: the vapour molecules are processed through selective membranes to separate the vapour/air mixture into a hydrocarbon-enriched phase (permeate), which is subsequently condensed or absorbed, and a hydrocarbon-depleted phase (retentate).

—   Two-stage refrigeration/condensation: by cooling of the vapour/gas mixture the vapour molecules condense and are separated as a liquid. As the humidity leads to the icing-up of the heat exchanger, a two-stage condensation process providing for alternate operation is required.

—   Hybrid systems: combinations of available techniques

NB

Absorption and adsorption processes cannot notably reduce methane emissions.

Vapour destruction

Destruction of VOCs can be achieved through e.g. thermal oxidation (incineration) or catalytic oxidation when recovery is not easily feasible. Safety requirements (e.g. flame arrestors) are needed to prevent explosion.

Thermal oxidation occurs typically in single chamber, refractory-lined oxidisers equipped with gas burner and a stack. If gasoline is present, heat exchanger efficiency is limited and preheat temperatures are maintained below 180 °C to reduce ignition risk. Operating temperatures range from 760 °C to 870 °C and residence times are typically 1 second. When a specific incinerator is not available for this purpose, an existing furnace may be used to provide the required temperature and residence times.

Catalytic oxidation requires a catalyst to accelerate the rate of oxidation by adsorbing the oxygen and the VOCs on its surface The catalyst enables the oxidation reaction to occur at lower temperature than required by thermal oxidation: typically ranging from 320 °C to 540 °C. A first preheating step (electrically or with gas) takes place to reach a temperature necessary to initiate the VOCs catalytic oxidation. An oxidation step occurs when the air is passed through a bed of solid catalysts

LDAR (leak detection and repair) programme

An LDAR (leak detection and repair) programme is a structured approach to reduce fugitive VOC emissions by detection and subsequent repair or replacement of leaking components. Currently, sniffing (described by EN 15446) and optical gas imaging methods are available for the identification of the leaks.

Sniffing method: The first step is the detection using hand-held VOC analysers measuring the concentration adjacent to the equipment (e.g. by using flame ionisation or photo-ionisation). The second step consists of bagging the component to carry out a direct measurement at the source of emission. This second step is sometimes replaced by mathematical correlation curves derived from statistical results obtained from a large number of previous measurements made on similar components.

Optical gas imaging methods: Optical imaging uses small lightweight hand-held cameras which enable the visualisation of gas leaks in real time, so that they appear as 'smoke' on a video recorder together with the normal image of the component concerned to easily and rapidly locate significant VOC leaks. Active systems produce an image with a back-scattered infrared laser light reflected on the component and its surroundings. Passive systems are based on the natural infrared radiation of the equipment and its surroundings

VOC diffuse emissions monitoring

Full screening and quantification of site emissions can be undertaken with an appropriate combination of complementary methods, e.g. Solar occultation flux (SOF) or differential absorption lidar (DIAL) campaigns. These results can be used for trend evaluation in time, cross checking and updating/validation of the ongoing LDAR programme.

Solar occultation flux (SOF): The technique is based on the recording and spectrometric Fourier Transform analysis of a broadband infrared or ultraviolet/visible sunlight spectrum along a given geographical itinerary, crossing the wind direction and cutting through VOC plumes.

Differential absorption LIDAR (DIAL): DIAL is a laser-based technique using differential adsorption LIDAR (light detection and ranging) which is the optical analogue of sonic radio wave-based RADAR. The technique relies on the back-scattering of laser beam pulses by atmospheric aerosols, and the analysis of spectral properties of the returned light collected with a telescope

High-integrity equipment

High-integrity equipment includes e.g.:

| — | valves with double packing seals |
| --- | --- |

—

valves with double packing seals

| — | magnetically driven pumps/compressors/agitators |
| --- | --- |

—

magnetically driven pumps/compressors/agitators

| — | pumps/compressors/agitators fitted with mechanical seals instead of packing |
| --- | --- |

—

pumps/compressors/agitators fitted with mechanical seals instead of packing

| — | high-integrity gaskets (such as spiral wound, ring joints) for critical applications |
| --- | --- |

—

high-integrity gaskets (such as spiral wound, ring joints) for critical applications

1.20.7.   Other techniques

| Techniques to prevent or reduce emissions from flaring | Correct plant design: includes sufficient flare gas recovery system capacity, the use of high-integrity relief valves and other measures to use flaring only as a safety system for other than normal operations (start-up, shutdown, emergency).

  Plant management: includes organisational and control measures to reduce flaring events by balancing RFG system, using advanced process control, etc.

  Flaring devices design: includes height, pressure, assistance by steam, air or gas, type of flare tips, etc. It aims at enabling smokeless and reliable operations and ensuring an efficient combustion of excess gases when flaring from non-routine operations.

  Monitoring and reporting: Continuous monitoring (measurements of gas flow and estimations of other parameters) of gas sent to flaring and associated parameters of combustion (e.g. flow gas mixture and heat content, ratio of assistance, velocity, purge gas flow rate, pollutant emissions). Reporting of flaring events makes it possible to use flaring ratio as a requirement included in the EMS and to prevent future events.
  Visual remote monitoring of the flare can also be carried out by using colour TV monitors during flare events |
| --- | --- |
| Choice of the catalyst promoter to avoid dioxins formation | During the regeneration of the reformer catalyst, organic chloride is generally needed for effective reforming catalyst performance (to re-establish the proper chloride balance in the catalyst and to assure the correct dispersion of the metals). The choice of the appropriate chlorinated compound will have an influence on the possibility of emissions of dioxins and furans |
| Solvent recovery for base oil production processes | The solvent recovery unit consists of a distillation step where the solvents are recovered from the oil stream and a stripping step (with steam or an inert gas) in a fractionator.
  The solvents used may be a mixture (DiMe) of 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE) and dichloromethane (DCM).
  In wax-processing units, solvent recovery (e.g. for DCE) is carried out using two systems: one for the deoiled wax and another one for the soft wax. Both consist of heat-integrated flashdrums and a vacuum stripper. Streams from the dewaxed oil and waxes product are stripped for removal of traces of solvents |

Techniques to prevent or reduce emissions from flaring

Correct plant design: includes sufficient flare gas recovery system capacity, the use of high-integrity relief valves and other measures to use flaring only as a safety system for other than normal operations (start-up, shutdown, emergency).

Plant management: includes organisational and control measures to reduce flaring events by balancing RFG system, using advanced process control, etc.

Flaring devices design: includes height, pressure, assistance by steam, air or gas, type of flare tips, etc. It aims at enabling smokeless and reliable operations and ensuring an efficient combustion of excess gases when flaring from non-routine operations.

Monitoring and reporting: Continuous monitoring (measurements of gas flow and estimations of other parameters) of gas sent to flaring and associated parameters of combustion (e.g. flow gas mixture and heat content, ratio of assistance, velocity, purge gas flow rate, pollutant emissions). Reporting of flaring events makes it possible to use flaring ratio as a requirement included in the EMS and to prevent future events.

Visual remote monitoring of the flare can also be carried out by using colour TV monitors during flare events

Choice of the catalyst promoter to avoid dioxins formation

During the regeneration of the reformer catalyst, organic chloride is generally needed for effective reforming catalyst performance (to re-establish the proper chloride balance in the catalyst and to assure the correct dispersion of the metals). The choice of the appropriate chlorinated compound will have an influence on the possibility of emissions of dioxins and furans

Solvent recovery for base oil production processes

The solvent recovery unit consists of a distillation step where the solvents are recovered from the oil stream and a stripping step (with steam or an inert gas) in a fractionator.

The solvents used may be a mixture (DiMe) of 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE) and dichloromethane (DCM).

In wax-processing units, solvent recovery (e.g. for DCE) is carried out using two systems: one for the deoiled wax and another one for the soft wax. Both consist of heat-integrated flashdrums and a vacuum stripper. Streams from the dewaxed oil and waxes product are stripped for removal of traces of solvents

1.21.   Description of techniques for the prevention and control of emissions to water

1.21.1.   Waste water pretreatment

| Pretreatment of sour water streams before reuse or treatment | Send generated sour water (e.g. from distillation, cracking, coking units) to appropriate pretreatment (e.g. stripper unit) |
| --- | --- |
| Pretreatment of other waste water streams prior to treatment | To maintain treatment performance, appropriate pretreatment may be required |

Pretreatment of sour water streams before reuse or treatment

Send generated sour water (e.g. from distillation, cracking, coking units) to appropriate pretreatment (e.g. stripper unit)

Pretreatment of other waste water streams prior to treatment

To maintain treatment performance, appropriate pretreatment may be required

1.21.2.   Waste water treatment

| Removal of insoluble substances by recovering oil. | These techniques generally include:






  — | API Separators (APIs) |
| --- | --- | --- |

Removal of insoluble substances by recovering oil.

These techniques generally include:

—

API Separators (APIs)

| — | Corrugated Plate Interceptors (CPIs) |
| --- | --- |

—

Corrugated Plate Interceptors (CPIs)

| — | Parallel Plate Interceptors (PPIs) |
| --- | --- |

—

Parallel Plate Interceptors (PPIs)

| — | Tilted Plate Interceptors (TPIs) |
| --- | --- |

—

Tilted Plate Interceptors (TPIs)

| — | Buffer and/or equalisation tanks |
| --- | --- |

—

Buffer and/or equalisation tanks

Removal of insoluble substances by recovering suspended solid and dispersed oil

These techniques generally include:

| — | Dissolved Gas Flotation (DGF) |
| --- | --- |

—

Dissolved Gas Flotation (DGF)

| — | Induced Gas Flotation (IGF) |
| --- | --- |

—

Induced Gas Flotation (IGF)

| — | Sand Filtration |
| --- | --- |

—

Sand Filtration

Removal of soluble substances including biological treatment and clarification

Biological treatment techniques may include:

| — | Fixed bed systems |
| --- | --- |

—

Fixed bed systems

| — | Suspended bed systems. |
| --- | --- |

—

Suspended bed systems.

One of the most commonly used suspended bed system in refineries WWTP is the activated sludge process. Fixed bed systems may include a biofilter or trickling filter

Additional treatment step

A specific waste water treatment intended to complement the previous treatment steps e.g. for further reducing nitrogen or carbon compounds. Generally used where specific local requirements for water preservation exist.

---

(1)  In case of applying BAT 58.

(2)  Continuous measurement of SO2 emissions may be replaced by calculations based on measurements of the sulphur content of the fuel or the feed; where it can be demonstrated that this leads to an equivalent level of accuracy.

(3)  Regarding SOX, only SO2 is continuously measured, while SO3 is only periodically measured (e.g. during calibration of the SO2 monitoring system).

(4)  Refers to the total rated thermal input of all combustion units connected to the stack where emissions occur.

(5)  Or indirect monitoring of SOX.

(6)  Monitoring frequencies may be adapted if, after a period of one year, the data series clearly demonstrate a sufficient stability.

(7)  SO2 emissions measurements from SRU may be replaced by a continuous material balance or other relevant process parameter monitoring, provided appropriate measurements of SRU efficiency are based on periodic (e.g. once every 2 years) plant performance tests.

(8)  Antimony (Sb) is monitored only in catalytic cracking units when Sb injection is used in the process (e.g. for metals passivation).

(9)  With the exception of combustion units firing only gaseous fuels.

(10)  N and S monitoring in fuel or feed may not be necessary when continuous emission measurements of NOX and SO2 are carried out at the stack.

(11)  The higher end of the range is associated with higher inlet NOX concentrations, higher NOX reduction rates and the ageing of the catalyst.

(12)  The lower end of the range is associated with the use of the SCR technique.

(13)  Not all parameters and sampling frequencies are applicable to effluent from gas refining sites.

(14)  Refers to a flow-proportional composite sample taken over a period of 24 hours or, provided that sufficient flow stability is demonstrated, a time-proportional sample.

(15)  Moving from the current method to EN 9377-2 may require an adaptation period.

(16)  Where on-site correlation is available, COD may be replaced by TOC. The correlation between COD and TOC should be elaborated on a case-by-case basis. TOC monitoring would be the preferred option because it does not rely on the use of very toxic compounds.

(17)  Where total-nitrogen is the sum of total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), nitrates and nitrites.

(18)  When nitrification/denitrification is used, levels below 15 mg/l can be achieved.

(19)  When antimony (Sb) injection is used for metal passivation, NOX levels up to 700 mg/Nm3 may occur. The lower end of the range can be achieved by using the SCR technique.

(20)  Soot blowing in CO boiler and through the gas cooler is excluded.

(21)  The lower end of the range can be achieved with a 4-field ESP.

(22)  Where selection of low sulphur (e.g. < 0,5 % w/w) feed (or hydrotreatment) and/or scrubbing is applicable, for all combustion modes: the upper end of the BAT-AEL range is ≤ 600 mg/Nm3.

(23)  May not be achievable when not operating the CO boiler at full load.

(24)  The lower end of the range can be achieved with a 4-field ESP.

(25)  When an ESP is not applicable, values of up to 150 mg/Nm3 may occur.

(26)  BAT-AEL refers to combined emissions from the gas turbine and the supplementary firing recovery boiler, where present.

(27)  For fuel with high H2 content (i.e. above 10 %), the upper end of the range is 75 mg/Nm3.

(28)  For an existing unit using high air pre-heat (i.e. > 200 °C) or with H2 content in the fuel gas higher than 50 %, the upper end of the BAT-AEL range is 200 mg/Nm3.

(29)  For existing units < 100 MW firing fuel oil with a nitrogen content higher than 0,5 % (w/w) or with liquid firing > 50 % or using air preheating, values up to 450 mg/Nm3 may occur.

(30)  The lower end of the range can be achieved by using the SCR technique.

(31)  The lower end of the range is achievable for units with the use of end-of-pipe techniques.

(32)  The upper end of the range refers to the use of a high percentage of oil burning and where only primary techniques are applicable.

(33)  In the specific configuration of RFG treatment with a low scrubber operative pressure and with a refinery fuel gas with an H/C molar ratio above 5, the upper end of the BAT-AEL range can be as high as 45 mg/Nm3.

(34)  Techniques ii and iii may not be generally applicable where tanks are dedicated to products that require heat for liquid handling (e.g. bitumen), and where no leak is likely because of solidification.

(35)  A vapour destruction unit (e.g. by incineration) may be substituted for a vapour recovery unit, if vapour recovery is unsafe or technically impossible because of the volume of return vapour.

(36)  Hourly values in continuous operation expressed and measured according to European Parliament and Council Directive 94/63/EC (OJ L 365, 31.12.1994, p. 24).

(37)  Lower value achievable with two-stage hybrid systems. Upper value achievable with single-stage adsorption or membrane system.

(38)  Benzene monitoring may not be necessary where emissions of NMVOC are at the lower end of the range.

(39)  May not be applicable for stand-alone lubricant or bitumen refineries with a release of sulphur compounds of less than 1 t/d

(40)  Sulphur recovery efficiency is calculated over the whole treatment chain (including SRU and TGTU) as the fraction of sulphur in the feed that is recovered in the sulphur stream routed to the collection pits.

When the applied technique does not include a recovery of sulphur (e.g. seawater scrubber), it refers to the sulphur removal efficiency, as the % of sulphur removed by the whole treatment chain.

---