alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
42.1701 Procedures.       (a) 						            Negotiation of forward pricing rate agreements (FPRA’s) may be requested by the contracting officer or the contractor or initiated by the administrative contracting officer (ACO). In determining whether or not to establish such an agreement, the ACO should consider whether the benefits to be derived from the agreement are commensurate with the effort of establishing and monitoring it. Normally, FPRA’s should be negotiated only with contractors having a significant volume of Government contract proposals. The cognizant contract administration agency shall determine whether an FPRA will be established.                                          (b) 						            The ACO shall obtain the contractor’s forward pricing rate proposal and require that it include cost or pricing data that are accurate, complete, and current as of the date of submission (but see 15.407-3(c)). The ACO shall invite the cognizant contract auditor and contracting offices having a significant interest to participate in developing a Government objective and in the negotiations. Upon completing negotiations, the ACO shall prepare a price negotiation memorandum (PNM) (see 15.406-3) and forward copies of the PNM and FPRA to the cognizant auditor and to all contracting offices that are known to be affected by the FPRA.                                          (c) 						            The FPRA shall provide specific terms and conditions covering expiration, application, and data requirements for systematic monitoring to ensure the validity of the rates. The agreement shall provide for cancellation at the option of either party and shall require the contractor to submit to the ACO and to the cognizant contract auditor any significant change in cost or pricing data used to support the FPRA.                                          (d) 						            When an FPRA is invalid, the contractor should submit and negotiate a new proposal to reflect the changed conditions. If an FPRA has not been established or has been invalidated, the ACO will issue a forward pricing rate recommendation (FPRR) to buying activities with documentation to assist negotiators. In the absence of an FPRA or FPRR, the ACO shall include support for rates utilized.                                          (e) 						            The ACO may negotiate continuous updates to the FPRA. The FPRA will provide specific terms and conditions covering notification, application, and data requirements for systematic monitoring to ensure the validity of the rates.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 42.17 - Forward Pricing Rate Agreements
# L_2015246DE.01001102.xml

| 23.9.2015 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 246/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.9.2015

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 246/11

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 165/2014 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 4. Februar 2014 über Fahrtenschreiber im Straßenverkehr, zur Aufhebung der Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 3821/85 des Rates über das Kontrollgerät im Straßenverkehr und zur Änderung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 561/2006 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates zur Harmonisierung bestimmter Sozialvorschriften im Straßenverkehr

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 60 vom 28. Februar 2014
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 60 vom 28. Februar 2014

Seite 18, Artikel 36 (Überschrift):

anstatt:

„Vom Fahrer durchzuführende Aufzeichnungen“;

muss es heißen:

„Vom Fahrer mitzuführende Aufzeichnungen“.

---
§ 764.106 Exceptions to security requirements. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 65040 , Aug. 8, 2024.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this part, the Agency will not take a security interest: ( a ) When adequate security is otherwise available and the lien will prevent the applicant from obtaining credit from other sources;
( b ) When the property could have significant environmental problems or costs as described in part 799 of this chapter;
( c ) When the Agency cannot obtain a valid lien;
( d ) When the property is the applicant's personal residence and appurtenances and: ( 1 ) They are located on a separate parcel; and
( 2 ) The real estate that serves as security for the FLP loan plus crops and chattels are greater than or equal to 150 percent of the unpaid balance due on the loan;
( e ) When the property is subsistence livestock, cash, working capital accounts the applicant uses for the farming operation, retirement accounts, personal vehicles necessary for family living, household contents, or small equipment such as hand tools and lawn mowers; or
( f ) On marginal land and timber that secures an outstanding ST loan.
[72 FR 63298, Nov. 8, 2007, as amended at 81 FR 51284, Aug. 3, 2016]
Editorial Note on Part 91
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 91 appear at 61 FR 51350, Oct. 2 1996.

§ 91.13 When an application may be rejected. ( a ) An application for a laboratory service may be rejected by the Administrator when deemed appropriate as follows: ( 1 ) For non-compliance by the applicant with the regulations in this part,
( 2 ) For non-payment of previous laboratory services rendered,
( 3 ) When the sample is not properly identified by a code or other marks,
( 4 ) When the samples are received in an unsatisfactory condition and are rejected for analysis,
( 5 ) When there is evidence or knowledge of tampering with the sample,
( 6 ) When it appears that to perform the analytical testing or laboratory service specified in this part would not be to the best interests of the public welfare or of the Government, or
( 7 ) When it appears to the Administrator that prior commitments of the Department necessitate rejection of the application.
( b ) Each such applicant shall be promptly notified by registered mail of the reasons for the rejection.
( c ) A written petition for reconsideration of such rejection may be filed by the applicant with the Administrator if postmarked or delivered within 10 days after the receipt of notice of the rejection. Such petition shall state specifically the errors alleged to have been made by the Administrator in rejecting the application. Within 20 days following the receipt of such a petition for reconsideration, the Administrator shall approve the application or notify the applicant by registered mail of the reasons for the rejection thereof.
#### § 798.3 Index.

5 U.S.C. 552(a)(2) requires that each agency publish or otherwise make available a current index of all materials required to be made available for public inspection and copying. FSA maintains an index of FSA National Handbooks, CCC Board Dockets, decisions of the Board of Contract Appeals of the Department of Agriculture affecting FSA or CCC, and Marketing Quota Review Committee determinations. In view of the small number of public requests for such index, publication of the index is unnecessary and impractical. The index is maintained and available to the public at the office shown in § 798.2 and copies of the index are available upon request in person or by mail to that office.
§ 769.165 Loan servicing. ( a ) *Payments.* The intermediary will make payments to the Agency as specified in the HPRP loan documents. All payments will be applied to interest first, any additional amount will be applied to principal.
( b ) *Restructuring.* The Agency may restructure the intermediary's loan debt, if: ( 1 ) The loan objectives cannot be met unless the HPRP loan is restructured;
( 2 ) The Agency's interest will be protected; and
( 3 ) The restructuring will be within the Agency's budget authority.
( c ) *Default.* The Agency will work with the intermediary to correct any default, subject to the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section. In the event of monetary or non-monetary default, the Agency will take all appropriate actions to protect its interest, including, but not limited to, declaring the debt fully due and payable and may proceed to enforce its rights under the HPRP loan agreement, and any other loan instruments relating to the loan under applicable law and regulations, and commencement of legal action to protect the Agency's interest. Violation of any agreement with the Agency or failure to comply with reporting or other HPRP requirements will be considered non-monetary default.
52.203-9 [Reserved]

Parent topic: 52.203 [Reserved]
§ 58.220 Drying systems. ( a ) *Spray dryers.* Spray dryers shall be of a continuous discharge type and all product contact surfaces shall be of stainless steel or other equally corrosion resistant material. All joints and seams in the product contact surfaces shall be welded and ground smooth. All dryers shall be constructed so as to facilitate ease in cleaning and inspection. Sight glasses or ports of sufficient size shall be located at strategic positions. Dryers shall be equipped with suitable air intake filters. The filter system shall comply with the applicable requirements of the 3-A Accepted Practices for Milk and Milk Products Spray Drying Systems. The filtering system shall be cleaned or component parts replaced as often as necessary to maintain a clean and adequate air supply. In gas fired dryers, precautions should be taken to assure complete combustion. Air shall be drawn into the dryer from sources free from objectionable odors and smoke, dust or dirt. New systems, replacement systems, or portions of systems replaced shall comply with the requirements of the 3-A Accepted Practices for Milk and Milk Products Spray Drying Systems.
( b ) *Roller dryers.* ( 1 ) The drums of a roller dryer shall be smooth, readily cleanable and free of pits and rust. The knives shall be maintained in such condition so as not to cause scoring of the drums.
( 2 ) The end boards shall have an impervious surface and be readily cleanable. They shall be provided with a means of adjustment to prevent leakage and accumulation of milk solids. The stack, hood, the drip pan inside of the hood and related shields shall be constructed of stainless steel and be readily cleanable. The lower edge of the hood shall be constructed so as to prevent condensate from entering the product zone. The hood shall be properly located and the stack of adequate capacity to remove the vapors. The stack shall be closed when the dryer is not in operation. The augers shall be stainless steel or properly plated, and readily cleanable. The auger troughs and related shields shall be of stainless steel and be readily cleanable. All air entering the dryer room shall be filtered to eliminate dust and dirt. The filter system shall consist of filtering media or device that will effectively, and in accordance with good commercial practices, prevent the entrance of foreign substances into the drying room. The filtering system shall be cleaned or component parts replaced as often as necessary to maintain a clean and adequate air supply. All dryer adjustments shall be made and the dryer operating normally before food grade product is collected from the dryer.
( c ) *Other drying systems.* These systems shall be constructed following the applicable principles of the 3-A Accepted Practices for Milk and Milk Products Spray Drying Systems.
Exhibit 31

      Exhibit 31:  Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications

Re:   Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc. Trust 2006-HE6 (the "Trust")

I, Steven Shapiro, the senior officer in charge of securitizations for the
depositor, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form
10-K of the Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in
this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the
Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations
under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of
compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be
included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances o
noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on
Form 10-K.
In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association, Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP, NC Capital Corporation, WMC
Mortgage Corp., Decision One Mortgage Company, LLC, LaSalle Bank National
Association, and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company.


Date: May 14, 2007

/s/ Steven Shapiro
By: Steven Shapiro
Title: Vice President (Senior officer in charge of securitization of Morgan
Stanley ABS Capital I Inc., the depositor)
§ 760.705 Payment rates and calculation of payments. ( a ) CAP payments will be calculated by multiplying the total number of reported or determined acres of an eligible crop by the per acre payment rate for that crop. Payment rates are as follows: ( 1 ) Long grain rice, $31.93 per acre;
( 2 ) Medium or short grain rice, $52.46 per acre;
( 3 ) Upland cotton, $17.70 per acre;
( 4 ) Soybeans, $15.62 per acre; and
( 5 ) Sweet potatoes, $155.41 per acre.
( b ) Payments will be calculated based on the 2009 crop year reported or determined planted or considered planted acres of an eligible crop on a farm in a disaster county as reflected on a form FSA-578, Report of Acreage, on file in FSA as of October 22, 2010.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2777 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on hand-held radio scanners. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 10, 2006 

Mrs. HUTCHISON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on hand-held 

radio scanners. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HAND-HELD RADIO SCANNERS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.23 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 hand-held radio scanners) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/ 

7 2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•S 2777 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Announcement is made of the availability for licensing of the invention set forth in patent application PCT/US2009/060850, entitled “Clinical Decision Model,” filed October 15, 2009. The United States Government, as represented by the Secretary of the Army, has rights to this invention.

# ADDRESSES:

Commander, U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, ATTN: Command Judge Advocate, MCMR-JA, 504 Scott Street, Fort Detrick, Frederick, MD 21702-5012.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        For patent issues, Ms. Elizabeth Arwine, Patent Attorney, (301) 619-7808. For licensing issues, Dr. Paul Mele, Office of Research and Technology Applications                               ( print page 75969)                            (ORTA), (301) 619-6664, both at telefax (301) 619-5034.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The invention relates to a model for providing a patient-specific diagnosis of disease using clinical data. More particularly, the invention relates to a fully unsupervised, machine-learned, cross-validated, and dynamic Bayesian Belief Network model that utilizes clinical parameters for determining a patient-specific probability of malignancy, transplant glomerulopathy, healing rate of an acute traumatic wound, and/or breast cancer risk.

Brenda S. Bowen

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2010-30608 Filed 12-6-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-P
CERTIFICATIONI, Kokmeng Koh, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-Drequired to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K ofPrincipal Life Income Fundings Trust 2006-57 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and otherinformation required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by thisreport is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required inthis report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the ExchangeAct period reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement(s) in all material respects; and  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be includedin this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A. and Bankers Trust Company, N.A.Date: March 28, 2007   /s/ Kokmeng Koh     Kokmeng Koh  Second Vice President
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, William B. Kretzmer,certify that:

 

1.               Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MAI SystemsCorporation;

 

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;

 

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrantand we have:

 

a)              designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

b)             evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as ofa date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “EvaluationDate”); and

 

c)              presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluationas of the Evaluation Date;

 

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation, to the registrant’s   auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent function):

 

a)              allsignificant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls whichcould adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors anymaterial weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b)             any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrols; and

 

6.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterlyreport whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or inother factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent tothe date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions withregard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

 
| Date: September 23,  2005 | By:    | /s/ William B. Kretzmer  |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|                           |   | William  B. Kretzmer     |
|                           |   | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

SOUTHERN DIVISION

NATHAN C. BELL, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 1:06-CV-00644-WKW

)

DARRELL L. SPRAGGINS, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

Upon consideration of the defendant’s Motion to Extend Deadline to File Answer or Other

Response (Doc. # 2), it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. Defendant shall answer or

otherwise respond on or before September 18, 2006.

DONE this the 31st day of July, 2006.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00644-WKW-SRW Document 3 Filed 07/31/2006 Page 1 of 1