alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Part 5610 - MARKET RESEARCH

Subpart 5610.000 - SCOPE OF PART

5610.001 Policy.

Subpart 5610.000 - SCOPE OF PART

5610.001 Policy.

(Added April 2008)

(a) When to Conduct Market Research

(1) Contracting Officers have the responsibility of informing all requiring activities that, in

accordance with FAR 10.001 , market research is required prior to the development of new

specifications and before soliciting any requisition over the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT).

(2) Contract actions awarded above the SAT shall include documentation that market research was

conducted. The market research documentation may be completed using the DCG Market Research

Report template. In the case of other than full and open competition, a J&A or other similar format

that covers the information areas in FAR 10 and the DCG market research template may be used.

(b) Classified Procurements

(1) Classified Procurements: Market research for contracts that will be classified must be consistent

with the security requirements imposed by FAR 6.302-6 , National Security, where disclosure of the

agency’s needs would compromise the national security. Any number of common approaches or

practices for performing market research (See FAR 10.002 ) may be used except those where the

requirement or other salient characteristics of the requirement, having National Security

implications, would be disclosed in the public domain or where other aspects of the security plan for

the requirement would be violated.

HQ, United States Special Operations Command

Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L-K)

SOFARS 5610

February 2007
No. 99-20761

- 1 -

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-20761

Conference Calendar

 

STEVEN E. DANIEL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

AMERICAN BROADCASTING CO.,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-98-CV-3411

- - - - - - - - - -

April 12, 2000

Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiff-Appellant Steven E. Daniel, Texas prisoner

#450142, seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP),

following the district court’s certification that his appeal

from the dismissal of his civil-rights complaint was taken in

bad faith. 

Daniel’s motions for appointment of counsel are DENIED.

Daniel’s allegations do not support a claim that the

defendant entered into a conspiracy with prison officials to
No. 99-20761

- 2 -

deprive Daniel of his constitutional rights. Accordingly, the

district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the

complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). See

Harper v. Showers, 174 F.3d 716, 718 (5th Cir. 1999)

Daniel’s appeal is without arguable merit and is frivolous. 

Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). 

Accordingly, Daniel’s IFP motion is DENIED and the appeal is

DISMISSED. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 

The district court’s dismissal of the present case and this

court’s dismissal of Daniel’s appeal count as two “strikes”

against him for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Daniel had

already accumulated one strike in Daniel v. Scheiner, No. 99-

20978 (S.D. Tex. Dec. 16, 1999). Because he now has three

strikes under the statute, Daniel may not proceed IFP in any

civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained

in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious

physical injury. § 1915(g).

IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION IMPOSED.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

PATRICK ANTHONY RIBBING,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 3:21cv181-MCR-HTC

STATE OF FLORIDA et al., 

Defendants.

 /

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report 

and Recommendation dated March 23, 2021. ECF No. 9. Plaintiff was furnished 

with a copy of the Report and Recommendation and was afforded an opportunity to 

file an objection pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have 

made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections 

thereto timely filed, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be 

adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 9, is 

adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.
Case No. 3:21cv181-MCR-HTC 

2. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for Plaintiff’s 

failure to prosecute, failure to comply with orders of the Court, and failure to keep 

the Court advised of his current mailing address. 

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 30th day of April 2021.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
§ 905.51 Recommendations for regulation. ( a ) Whenever the committee deems it advisable to regulate any variety in the manner provided in § 905.52, it shall give due consideration to the following factors relating to the citrus fruit produced in Florida and in other States: ( 1 ) Market prices, including prices by grades and sizes of the fruit for which regulation is recommended;
( 2 ) maturity, condition, and available supply, including the grade and size thereof in the producing areas;
( 3 ) other pertinent market information; and
( 4 ) the level and trend in consumer income. The committee shall submit to the Secretary its recommendations and supporting information respecting the factors enumerated in this section.
( b ) The committee shall give notice of any meeting to consider the recommendation of regulations pursuant to § 905.52 by mailing a notice of meeting to each handler who has filed his address with committee for this purpose. The committee shall give the same notice of any such recommendation before the time it is recommended that such regulation become effective.
[42 FR 59370, Nov. 17, 1977]
Exhibit 24.1
  Power of
    Attorney
  Form 10-K
    /s/ M. Jason BlackburnM.
    Jason Blackburn
    Secretary and Treasurer
    (Principal Financial Officer)

/s/ James D. DonderoJames
    D. Dondero
    President
    (Principal Executive Officer)/s/ R. Joseph DoughertyR.
    Joseph Dougherty
    Director, Chairman of the Board and
    Senior Vice President

/s/ Timothy K. HuiTimothy
    K. Hui
    Director/s/ Scott F. KavanaughScott
    F. Kavanaugh
    Director

/s/ James F. LearyJames
    F. Leary
    Director/s/ Bryan A. WardBryan
    A. Ward
    Director
§ 920.22 Nomination. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the committee shall hold, or cause to be held, not later than June 1 of each year in which nominations are made, or such other date as may be specified by the Secretary, a meeting or meetings of growers in each district for the purpose of designating nominees to serve as grower members and alternates on the committee. Any such meetings shall be supervised by the committee, which shall prescribe such procedures as shall be reasonable and fair to all persons concerned.
( b ) Nominations in any or all districts may be conducted by mail in a manner recommended by the committee and approved by the Secretary.
( c ) Only growers may participate in the nomination of grower members and their alternates. Each grower shall be entitled to cast only one vote for each position to be filled in the district in which such grower produces kiwifruit. No grower shall participate in the election of nominees in more than one district in any one fiscal year.
( d ) A particular grower shall be eligible for membership as member or alternate member to fill only one position on the committee.
( e ) The public member and alternate shall be nominated by the grower members of the committee.
[57 FR 1219, Jan. 12, 1992, as amended at 75 FR 37291, June 29, 2010]
§ 56.40 Grading requirements of shell eggs identified with grademarks. ( a ) Shell eggs to be identified with the grademarks illustrated in § 56.36 must be individually graded by a grader or by authorized personnel pursuant to § 56.11 and thereafter check graded by a grader.
( b ) Shell eggs not graded in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section may be officially graded on a sample basis and the shipping containers may be identified with grademarks which contain the words “Sample Graded” and which are approved by the Administrator.
( c ) In order to be officially identified with a USDA consumer grademark, shell eggs shall: ( 1 ) Be eggs of current production;
( 2 ) Not possess any undesirable odors or flavors;
( 3 ) Not have previously been shipped for retail sale;
( 4 ) Not originate from a layer house environment determined positive for the presence of Salmonella Enteritidis (SE), unless the eggs from the layer house have been sampled and have tested negative for the presence of SE in the eggs; and
( 5 ) Not originate from eggs testing positive for SE, or not have been subject to a product recall.
[32 FR 8231, June 8, 1967. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977, as amended at 46 FR 39571, Aug. 4, 1981. Redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981, as amended at 63 FR 13331, Mar. 19, 1998; 69 FR 76376, Dec. 21, 2004; 71 FR 20292, Apr. 19, 2006; 81 FR 63676, Sept. 16, 2016]
~-ç~D S7% UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 October 17, 2014
Aneth Chapter, Navajo Nation Reservation P.O. Box 430 Montezuma Creek, UT 85434 ATTN: ADMIN OFFICE Subject: Public documents atthe Aneth Chapter for public inspection Dear Siror Madam: The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency sentyou apackage containing a number ofdocuments regarding the McElmo Creek Unit Oil Production Facility on the Navajo Nation Indian Reservation nearthe city ofAneth, San Juan County, Utah. Two ofthese documents contained an error, and need to be replaced. Please replace the following documents in the package previously sent to you with the enclosed documents: 1. PUBLIC INFORMATION SHEET 2. AMBIENTAIR QUALITY IMPACT REPORT & FACT SHEET Yourassistance with this matter is greatly appreciate. Feel freeto contact me at (415) 947-4156 or kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov ifyou have any questions.Sincerely,



# /
Shaheerah Environmental Engineer Permits Office Air Division
Enclosures
# 28.203           Individual Sureties.

- 28.203-1 Acceptability of individual sureties. 
- 28.203-2 Substitution of assets. 
- 28.203-3 Release of security interest. 
- 28.203-4 Solicitation provision and contract clause. 
- 28.203-5 Exclusion of individual sureties. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 28.2 - Sureties and Other Security for Bonds
Exhibit No. 32.1
Form 10-KSB
BTHC X, Inc.
File No.  0-52237


          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection  with the Annual  Report of BTHC X, Inc.  (the  "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the year ended  December  31, 2007 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Timothy P. Halter,
Chief  Executive and Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: February 25, 2008                       By:    Timothy P. Halter
      -----------------                            -----------------------------
                                                               Timothy P. Halter
                                                             Chief Executive and
                                                         Chief Financial Officer



A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to BTHC X, Inc. and will be retained by BTHC X, Inc.  and  furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 61.103 Determination of quality index. The quality index of cottonseed shall be an index of purity and soundness, and shall be determined as follows: ( a ) *Prime quality cottonseed.* Cottonseed that by analysis contains not more than 1.0 percent of foreign matter, not more than 12.0 percent of moisture, and not more than 1.8 percent of free fatty acids in the oil in the seed, shall be known as prime quality cottonseed and shall have a quality index of 100.
( b ) *Below prime quality cottonseed.* The quality index of cottonseed that, by analysis, contain foreign matter, moisture, or free fatty acids in the oil in the seed, in excess of the percentages prescribed in paragraph (a) of this section shall be found by reducing the quality index of prime quality cottonseed as follows: ( 1 ) Four-tenths of a unit for each 0.1 percent of free fatty acids in the oil in the seed in excess of 1.8 percent.
( 2 ) One-tenth of a unit for each 0.1 percent of foreign matter in excess of 1.0 percent.
( 3 ) One-tenth of a unit for each 0.1 percent of moisture in excess of 12.0 percent.
( c ) *Off quality cottonseed.* Cottonseed that has been treated by either mechanical or chemical process other than the usual cleaning, drying, and ginning (except sterilization required by the United States Department of Agriculture for quarantine purposes) or that are fermented or hot, or that upon analysis are found to contain 12.5 percent or more of free fatty acids in the oil in the seed, or more than 10.0 percent of foreign matter, or more than 20.0 percent of moisture, or more than 25.0 percent of moisture and foreign matter combined, shall be designated as “off quality cottonseed.”
( d ) *Below grade cottonseed.* Cottonseed the grade of which when calculated according to § 61.101 is below grade 40.0 shall be designated as “below grade cottonseed,” and a numerical grade shall not be indicated.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Authority:

7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 810.403 Basis of determination.

Each determination of class, damaged kernels, heat-damaged kernels, waxy corn, flint corn, and flint and dent corn is made on the basis of the grain after the removal of the broken corn and foreign material. Other determinations not specifically provided for under the general provisions are made on the basis of the grain as a whole, except the determination of odor is made on either the basis of the grain as a whole or the grain when free from broken corn and foreign material.

[52 FR 24418, June 30, 1987; 52 FR 28534, July 31, 1987]
C/) I .n 

""0 

r-+-

('1) 

> 3 n 

-1 

< CT -1 

m ('1) Vl 

' ..., z 

0 

-1 

m 

Vl 

I I 

> 

n 

-1 

,;, l < C/) C..""':'· -1 ,·-· m .... ' Vl ('1) ' ~ ... z 

0 ""0 Y';f -1 

m r-+- V> 

~') ('1) 

u.J / :i ,. 

& 

('1) 

..., 
2005 S M T W T F S I l 3 S M T W T F S 

3 4 s 6 7 

2007 

S M T W T F S 

1 

4 s 6 7 8 2 l 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 

18 19 20 21 22 23 24 

25 26 27 28 29 30 

'-------

______ __j 

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 

24 25 26 27 28 29 30 

l 9 10 11 12 13 1.11 15 

16 17 18 19 20 21 22 1 123 24 25 26 27 28 29 

w 

AC TIVITI ES/NOTES 

OCT 0 1 2008 

'--- JO t=--A-_ -- A f Ou)(_ _l0 2 ~o {3., r1. 

4N ]) \ 1'1£\-(06 ( () _ _ ___ ~- _ 

 

o 

_

rzEFf _57 . s-~J£ /3_ ,:__ _ 'Hlu/it_ 7£:9__F i(WA'1 

_f2£F F. ~ I )0 I ~3 oo ~ ~~ - -

L.. v~ ... ..... 

_ ,, •r d ~,~3 R~P -

4-~ -=f,IVff 

CuNI?f:' w(QC /'10 

-

r [ • A. q.u_f[RJ - ~ Jol;{_ti__ I5 1 ,/140G70 - -- ~-~-- P' .4-G>dJ1 f..-tM £ AQ.Q:' vi 61-J. !DC~ 

..,.'--' ,, -vuv 1(.._\ Lf:.- , -r, .1.f1P =- !I:{uu~r Ar21C 4__e---:t7

r,vPf 0 _---

IN 

(rt:_(l_~f£'w6 f · 0

' __f? 'S~urvO _1;.~ ~\-.A-1 _ 1+1 No 2. tU~ \f\l ~G£- A- -ro-t -

--

OCT I 3 2008 

1--i ~ L J)~ A-v Q BJ C !- f1<-,F T _ ?fit~ ~1' AJ. J ~ JJ ~ (2_ tr, t? -

~ ,r-- . ~ _ _, ~ 

_{lf --=g rsctc -- J)__ffrv if-? _ ~!l:" .t:;., ·"L 

--,-----

11.1 ,.,~ _.n 

~ 

-

a '8?.:_1£-Q____ S"NY f?ZJV -' ~ ()___ £_!:£ cf~ 

A-5Ju) t..C¥Ia• 

£ 7T f5L-

~o f...Y./ 

 NA:C
Exhibit 99.2



                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Real Estate  Fund
85-A  Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-QSB  for
the  period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark E.
Larson,  Chief  Financial Officer of Net Lease  Management  85-A,
Inc.,  the Managing General Partner of the Partnership,  certify,
pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section  906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



                              /s/ Mark E Larson
                                  Mark E. Larson
                                  Chief Financial Officer of
                                  Net Lease Management 85-A, Inc.,
                                  the Managing General Partner
                                  August 6, 2002
211.7001 Procedures.       Follow the procedures at PGI 211.7001 for developing and distributing purchase requests, except for the requirements for Military Interdepartmental Purchase Requests (DD Form 448) addressed in 253.208-1.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 211.70 - PURCHASE REQUESTS
#### CUSTAR v. ABBOTT.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 19, 1914.)

Action by Ignatius Custar against William L. Abbott.

No opinion. Motion granted, unless appellant complies with terms stated in order. Order filed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 

v. Case No. 3:20cr40-5/TKW

DEMONTE EASLEY

______________________________/

ACCEPTANCE OF PLEA OF GUILTY

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate 

Judge, to which there have been no timely objections, the plea of guilty of the 

Defendant, DEMONTE EASLEY, to Count One and Count Eight of the 

Superseding Indictment is hereby ACCEPTED. All parties shall appear before this 

Court for sentencing as directed.

DONE AND ORDERED this 20th day of May 2021.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Guidance Software, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies that:



| | (i) | the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |  |  |                                                           
|------------------------ |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|                         |  | 
|Dated: February 26, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/    VICTOR T. LIMONGELLI                               
|                         |  |  |  | Victor T. Limongelli President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic
version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Guidance Software, Inc. and will be retained by Guidance Software, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 2:06-cv-00639-WKW-TFM Document 6 Filed 08/01/2006 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.52


FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
NUSTAR GP, LLC FIFTH AMENDED AND RESTATED
2000 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
This First Amendment (this “Amendment’) to the NuStar GP, LLC Fifth Amended and Restated 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is made and entered into as of February 7, 2018 pursuant to resolutions of the Compensation Committee (the “Compensation Committee”) of the board of directors (the “Board”) of NuStar GP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and the general partner (the “Company”) of Riverwalk Logistics, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership and the general partner (the “General Partner”) of NuStar Energy L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “Partnership”).
WHEREAS, Section 7(a) of the Plan provides that the Compensation Committee or the Board may amend the Plan for any reason and without the consent of any holder of an award thereunder; 
WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee believes that amending the Plan as set forth in this Amendment will not adversely affect the material rights of any holder of an award thereunder; and
WHEREAS, in connection with the Merger (as defined in the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of February 7, 2018, by and among the Partnership, the General Partner, the Company, Marshall Merger Sub LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Partnership, NuStar GP Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“NSH”) and Riverwalk Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a wholly owned subsidiary of NSH), the Company desires to amend the Plan to clarify that the Merger does not constitute a “Change of Control” within the meaning of the Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed as follows:
		
	1.
	Section 2.5 of the Plan is hereby amended to add to the end thereof the following:




Notwithstanding anything in this Plan or any Award to the contrary, no Change of Control shall occur or be deemed to occur upon the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among NuStar Energy L.P., Riverwalk Logistics, L.P., NuStar GP, LLC, Marshall Merger Sub LLC, Riverwalk Holdings, LLC and NuStar GP Holdings, LLC to be dated on or about February 7, 2018, as it may be amended from time to time.
		
	2.
	Except as hereby modified, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.




[Signature Page Follows]













IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed this First Amendment to the NuStar GP, LLC Fifth Amended and Restated 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan as of the date first written above.
NUSTAR GP, LLC
    
By:    /s/ Thomas R. Shoaf                    
Name:    Thomas R. Shoaf
Title:     Executive Vice President and Chief 
 Financial Officer


















































































Signature Page to the First Amendment to the NuStar GP, LLC 
Fifth Amended and Restated 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan