alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA OF

NORTHERN DIVISION

RALPH BROWN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-642-MEF

)

CHAMPION ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

O R D E R

It is hereby ORDERED that defendant Champion Home Builders Co., Inc. respond

to the Court's order dated November 20, 2007 (Doc. #35) on or before December 5, 2007.

DONE this the 29th day of November, 2007.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 37 Filed 11/29/2007 Page 1 of 1
EX-34 (d)
(logo) PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers Center
300 Madison Avenue
New York NY 10017
Telephone (646) 471-3000
Facsimile (813) 286-6000


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors of JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association


We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Management's Report on Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing
Criteria, that JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association (the "Company")
complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities
and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the asset-backed securities
transactions backed by residential mortgages and home equity loans, for which
the Company acts as Custodian (the "Platform"), as of September 30, 2006 and for
the period from January 1, 2006 to September 30, 2006 excluding the criteria
1122(d) (1)(i)-(iv), (2)(i)-(vii), (3)(i)-(iv), and (4)(iii)-(xv), which the
Company has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by it with
respect to the Platform. Appendix A to management's assertion identifies the
individual asset-backed transactions and securities defined by management as
constituting the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's
compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining,
on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected
asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of
selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether
the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected
activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures
were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by
the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not
designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred
prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or
amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this
report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's
compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the period ended
September 30, 2006 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

March 1, 2007
APPENDIX E  - RESERVED Table Of          Contents           **Parent topic:** Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation
DAVID MALONEY

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY

SAFETY AND MOTOR

VEHICLES

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 5661

Opinion filed June 5, 2017.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari

– Original Jurisdiction

.

Eilam Isaak, Isaak Law, PLLC, Tampa , for Petitioner.

Christie S. Utt, General Counsel, Natalia Costea, Assistant General Counsel,

Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, Miami , for Respond ent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is DENIED on the merits.

ROBERTS, C.J., LEWIS, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
§ 760.25 Estates and trusts; minors. ( a ) A receiver of an insolvent debtor's estate and the trustee of a trust estate shall, for the purpose of this subpart, be considered to represent an insolvent affected farmer or manufacturer and the beneficiaries of a trust, respectively, and the production of the receiver or trustee shall be considered to be the production of the person or manufacturer he represents. Program documents executed by any such person will be accepted only if they are legally valid and such person has the authority to sign the applicable documents.
( b ) An affected dairy farmer or manufacturer who is a minor shall be eligible for indemnity payments only if he meets one of the following requirements: ( 1 ) The right of majority has been conferred on him by court proceedings or by statute;
( 2 ) A guardian has been appointed to manage his property and the applicable program documents are signed by the guardian; or
( 3 ) A bond is furnished under which the surety guarantees any loss incurred for which the minor would be liable had he been an adult.
§ 795.8 Corporations and stockholders. ( a ) A corporation (including a limited partnership) shall be considered as one person, and an individual stockholder of the corporation may be considered as a separate person to the extent that such stockholder is engaged in the production of the crop as a separate producer and otherwise meets the requirements of § 795.3, except that a corporation in which more than 50 percent of the stock is owned by an individual (including the stock owned by the individual's spouse, minor children, and trusts for the benefit of such minor children), or by a legal entity, shall not be considered as a separate person from such individual or legal entity.
( b ) Where the same two or more individuals or other legal entities own more than 50 percent of the stock in each of two or more corporations, all such corporations shall be considered as one person.
( c ) The percentage share of the value of the stock owned by an individual or other legal entity shall be determined as of March 1 of the crop year, except that where a stockholder voluntarily acquires stock after March 1 and before the harvest of the crop, the amount of any stock so acquired shall be included in determining the percentage share of the value of the stock owned by the stockholder. Where there is only one class of stock, a stockholder's percentage share of the value of the outstanding stock shall be equal to the percentage of the outstanding stock owned by the stockholder. If the corporation has more than one class of stock the percentage share of the value of the stock owned by a stockholder shall be determined by the Deputy Administrator on the basis of market quotations, and if market quotations are lacking or too scarce to be recognized the percentage share of the value of the stock shall be determined by the Deputy Administrator on the basis of all relevant factors affecting the fair market value, including the rights and privileges of the various stock issues.
(Title I, Agricultural Act of 1970, as amended by the Agriculture and Consumer Protection Act of 1973, Pub. L. 93-86, 87 Stat. 221 (7 U.S.C. 1307) and under Title I, Rice Production Act of 1975, Pub. L. 94-214, 90 Stat. 181 (7 U.S.C. 428c note), and Pub. L. 95-156, 91 Stat. 1264 (7 U.S.C. 1307 note, 7 U.S.C. 1307, 7 U.S.C. 1441))
[43 FR 9784, Mar. 10, 1978, as amended at 45 FR 10311, Feb. 15, 1980; 45 FR 11795, Feb. 22, 1980]
§ 760.507 Obligations of a participant. ( a ) Eligible orchardists and nursery tree growers must execute all required documents and complete the TAP-funded practice within 12 months of application approval.
( b ) Eligible orchardist or nursery tree growers must allow representatives of FSA to visit the site for the purposes of certifying compliance with TAP requirements.
( c ) Producers who do not meet all applicable requirements and obligations will not be eligible for payment.
Part 248 - RESERVED

Subpart 248.2 - (REMOVED)

Parent topic: Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation

Subpart 248.2 - (REMOVED)

(October 01, 2001)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

HAROLD KELLY MURPHY, * 

 * 

 Plaintiff, * 

 * 

vs. * CASE NO.: 2:06-cv-618-MEF 

* 

SOUTHERN ENERGY HOMES, INC., et al., * 

 * 

 Defendants. * 

NOTICE OF APPEAL 

 Plaintiff Harold Kelly Murphy hereby gives notice of its appeal to the United 

States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit from the final judgment in this action 

entered by the District Court on March 6, 2008 (Doc. #76), along with all interlocutory 

rulings leading up to the final judgment, including but not limited to the District Court’s 

denial of Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend complaint (Doc. #52). 

/s/ C. Lance Gould ___________ _ 

 C. LANCE GOULD (ASB-0913-G66C) 

 One of the Attorneys for the Plaintiff 

OF COUNSEL: 

BEASLEY, ALLEN, CROW, 

METHVIN, PORTIS & MILES, P.C. 

Attorneys at Law 

Post Office Box 4160 

Montgomery, AL 36103-4160 

(334) 269-2343 

(334) 954-7555 (fax) 

Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 78 Filed 04/04/2008 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on April 4, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing with the 

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing 

to the following: 

/s/ C. Lance Gould 

OF COUNSEL 

W. Scott Simpson 

RITCHEY & SIMPSON, PLLC 

3288 Morgan Drive, Suite 100 

Birmingham, Alabama 35216 

Telephone: (205) 822-3422 

Facsimile: (205) 822-3618 

e-mail: wssimpson@ritcheysimpson.com 

Lee E. Bains, Jr. 

Thomas W. Thagard, III 

Edward S. Sledge IV 

MAYNARD, COOPER & GALE, P.C. 

1901 Sixth Avenue North 

2400 AmSouth/Harbert Plaza 

Birmingham, AL 35203 

(205) 254-1000 (Telephone) 

(205) 254-1999 (Facsimile) 

lbains@maynardcooper.com 

tthagard@maynardcooper.com 

sledge@maynardcooper.com

Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 78 Filed 04/04/2008 Page 2 of 2
# L_2014183EN.01005601.xml

| 24.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 183/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 183/56

---

COUNCIL DECISION 2014/381/CFSP

of 23 June 2014

amending Decision 2010/573/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the leadership of the Transnistrian region of the Republic of Moldova

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 27 September 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/573/CFSP (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 27 September 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/573/CFSP (1).

| (2) | On 27 September 2013, the Council adopted Decision 2013/477/CFSP (2), which extended, on the basis of a review of Decision 2010/573/CFSP, the restrictive measures against the leadership of the Transnistrian region of the Republic of Moldova until 30 September 2014. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 27 September 2013, the Council adopted Decision 2013/477/CFSP (2), which extended, on the basis of a review of Decision 2010/573/CFSP, the restrictive measures against the leadership of the Transnistrian region of the Republic of Moldova until 30 September 2014.

| (3) | The restrictive measures should be extended until 31 October 2014. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The restrictive measures should be extended until 31 October 2014.

| (4) | Decision 2010/573/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Decision 2010/573/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Article 4(2) of Decision 2010/573/CFSP is hereby replaced by the following:

‘2.   This Decision shall apply until 31 October 2014. It shall be kept under constant review. It may be renewed or amended, as appropriate, if the Council deems that its objectives have not been met.’.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Luxembourg, 23 June 2014.

For the Council

The President

C. ASHTON

---

(1)  Council Decision 2010/573/CFSP of 27 September 2010 concerning restrictive measures against the leadership of the Transnistrian region of the Republic of Moldova (OJ L 253, 28.9.2010, p. 54).

1

(2)  Council Decision 2013/477/CFSP of 27 September 2013 amending Decision 2010/573/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the leadership of the Transnistrian region of the Republic of Moldova (OJ L 257, 28.9.2013, p. 18).

2

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

M IDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABA M A

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

October 25, 2006

NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE

To: ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD

Case Style: Finney v. Nissan North America, Inc. et al

Case Number: 3:06cv00622-WKW

Referenced Pleading: NOTICE

Docket Entry Number: 23

The referenced pleading was electronically filed on ***October 24, 2006*** in this case and

is not in compliance with the local rules and/or administrative procedures of this court. 

******This pleading is discovery and is not allowed pursuant to Local Rule 5.1 NON-FILING

OF CIVIL DISCOVERY.

The pleading is hereby STRICKEN from the record and the parties are instructed to disregard

the entry of this pleading on the court’s docket. Parties should be aware that the striking of

this entry does not affect their responsibilities as to the discovery process.

Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 24 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 1 of 1
52.215-15 Pension Adjustments and Asset

Reversions.

As prescribed in 15.408(g), insert the following clause:

Pension Adjustments and Asset Reversions (Oct 2010)

(a) The Contractor shall promptly notify the Contracting Officer in writing when it determines that it

will terminate a defined-benefit pension plan or otherwise recapture such pension fund assets.

(b) For segment closings, pension plan terminations, or curtailment of benefits, the amount of the

adjustment shall be-

(1) For contracts and subcontracts that are subject to full coverage under the Cost Accounting

Standards (CAS) Board rules and regulations (48 CFR Chapter 99), the amount measured, assigned,

and allocated in accordance with 48 CFR 9904.413-50(c)(12) ; and

(2) For contracts and subcontracts that are not subject to full coverage under the CAS, the amount

measured, assigned, and allocated in accordance with 48 CFR 9904.413-50(c)(12) , except the

numerator of the fraction at 48 CFR 9904.413-50(c)(12) (vi) shall be the sum of the pension plan

costs allocated to all non-CAS covered contracts and subcontracts that are subject to Federal

Acquisition Regulation (FAR) subpart 31.2 or for which certified cost or pricing data were

submitted.

(c) For all other situations where assets revert to the Contractor, or such assets are constructively

received by it for any reason, the Contractor shall, at the Government’s option, make a refund or

give a credit to the Government for its equitable share of the gross amount withdrawn. The

Government’s equitable share shall reflect the Government’s participation in pension costs through

those contracts for which certified cost or pricing data were submitted or that are subject to FAR

subpart 31.2.

(d) The Contractor shall include the substance of this clause in all subcontracts under this contract

that meet the applicability requirement of FAR 15.408(g).

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.215 [Reserved]
#### § 58.927 Storage.

Finished products which are to be held more than 30 days should be stored at temperatures below 72 °F Precautions shall be taken to prevent freezing of the product.
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 13-2 Filed 05/25/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 13-2 Filed 05/25/2007 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Photogen Technologies, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending June 30, 2003 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Brooks Boveroux, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company

 

 
| /s/ Brooks Boveroux     |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Brooks Boveroux         |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| October 20, 2003   |

 

----
52.107 Provisions and clauses prescribed in subpart 52.1.       (a) 						            The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 52.252-1, Solicitation Provisions Incorporated by Reference, in solicitations in order to incorporate provisions by reference.                                          (b) 						            The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.252-2, Clauses Incorporated by Reference, in solicitations and contracts in order to incorporate clauses by reference.                                          (c) 						            The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 52.252-3, Alterations in Solicitation, in solicitations in order to revise or supplement, as necessary, other parts of the solicitation that apply to the solicitation phase only, except for any provision authorized for use with a deviation.                                          (d) 						            The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.252-4, Alterations in Contract, in solicitations and contracts in order to revise or supplement, as necessary, other parts of the contract, or parts of the solicitations that apply to the contract phase, except for any clause authorized for use with a deviation.                                          (e) 						            The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 52.252-5, Authorized Deviations in Provisions, in solicitations that include any FAR or supplemental provision with an authorized deviation. Whenever any FAR or supplemental provision is used with an authorized deviation, the contracting officer shall identify it by the same number, title, and date assigned to the provision when it is used without deviation, include regulation name for any supplemental provision, except that the contracting officer shall insert "(DEVIATION)" after the date of the provision.                                          (f) 						            The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.252-6, Authorized Deviations in Clauses, in solicitations and contracts that include any FAR or supplemental clause with an authorized deviation. Whenever any FAR or supplemental clause is used with an authorized deviation, the contracting officer shall identify it by the same number, title, and date assigned to the clause when it is used without deviation, include regulation name for any supplemental clause, except that the contracting officer shall insert "(DEVIATION)" after the date of the clause.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 52.1 - Instructions for Using Provisions and Clauses
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2933 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on 1-[[2-(2,4- dichlorophenyl)– 

4-propyl-1,3-dioxolan-2-yl]-methyl]-1H-1,2,4-triazole). 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 23, 2006 

Mr. CARPER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on 1-[[2-(2,4- 

dichlorophenyl)–4-propyl-1,3-dioxolan-2-yl]-methyl]-1H1,2,4-triazole). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 1-[[2-(2,4- DICHLOROPHENYL)–4-PROPYL-1,3- 

4 DIOXOLAN-2-YL]-METHYL]-1H-1,2,4-TRIAZOLE). 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.29.80 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 1-[[2-(2,4- dichlorophenyl)–4-propyl-1,3-dioxolan-2-yl]- 

8 methyl]-1H-1,2,4-triazole)) is amended by striking ‘‘12/ 

9 31/2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 


dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•S 2933 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
Exhibit 99.1


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Real Estate  Fund
85-A  Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-QSB  for
the period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Robert P. Johnson, President of Net Lease Management 85-A, Inc..,
the   Managing  General  Partner  of  the  Partnership,  certify,
pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section  906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                           /s/ Robert P Johnson
                               Robert P. Johnson, President
                               Net Lease Management 85-A, Inc.
                               Managing General Partner
                               November 1, 2002