alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Centenary International
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Hector A. Patron Costas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Hector A. Patron Costas
--------------------------------
Hector A. Patron Costas
Chief Executive Officer
March 2, 2006

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
     other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
     signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
     written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
     the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
     staff upon request. The foregoing certifications are accompanying the
     Company's Form 10-QSB solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
     Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title
     18, United States Code) and are not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB
     or as a separate disclosure document.
# L_2015251EN.01001701.xml

| 26.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 251/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 251/17

---

Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 861/2013 of 2 September 2013 imposing a definitive countervailing duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain stainless steel wires originating in India

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 240 of 7 September 2013
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 240 of 7 September 2013

On page 1, in recital 5, indent:

for:

| ‘— | KEI Industries Limited, New Delhi (KEI).’, |
| --- | --- |

‘—

KEI Industries Limited, New Delhi (KEI).’,

read:

| ‘— | KEI Industries Ltd, New Delhi (KEI).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘—

KEI Industries Ltd, New Delhi (KEI).’.

On page 10, in recital 82:

for:

‘... as can be seen from the following table showing the average price of subsidised Indian exports falling under CN code 7223 00 19...’,

read:

‘... as can be seen from the following table showing the average price of Chinese exports falling under CN code 7223 00 19...’.

On page 12, in recital 108, in the table, the third and fourth entries:

for:

| ‘Viraj Profiles Vpl. Ltd | 0,9 % | n/a | 0,0 % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| KEI Industries Limited | 0,7 % | n/a | 0,0 %’ |

‘Viraj Profiles Vpl. Ltd

0,9 %

n/a

0,0 %

KEI Industries Limited

0,7 %

n/a

0,0 %’

read:

| ‘Viraj Profiles Ltd | 0,9 % | n/a | 0,0 % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| KEI Industries Ltd | 0,7 % | n/a | 0,0 %’. |

‘Viraj Profiles Ltd

0,9 %

n/a

0,0 %

KEI Industries Ltd

0,7 %

n/a

0,0 %’.

On page 13, in Article 1(2), in the table, the sixth and seventh entries:

for:

| ‘Viraj Profiles Vpl. Ltd, Thane, Maharashtra | 0,0 | B780 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| KEI Industries Limited, New Delhi | 0,0 | B925’ |

‘Viraj Profiles Vpl. Ltd, Thane, Maharashtra

0,0

B780

KEI Industries Limited, New Delhi

0,0

B925’

read:

| ‘Viraj Profiles Ltd, Thane, Maharashtra and Mumbai, Maharashtra | 0,0 | B780 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| KEI Industries Ltd, New Delhi | 0,0 | B925’. |

‘Viraj Profiles Ltd, Thane, Maharashtra and Mumbai, Maharashtra

0,0

B780

KEI Industries Ltd, New Delhi

0,0

B925’.

On page 14, in the Annex, in the table, in the sixth and tenth entries:

for:

| ‘Garg Inox Ltd | Bahadurgarh, Haryana | B931 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| .... | | |
| Nevatia Steel & Alloys Pvt. Ltd | Mumbai, Maharashtra | B933’ |

‘Garg Inox Ltd

Bahadurgarh, Haryana

B931

....

Nevatia Steel & Alloys Pvt. Ltd

Mumbai, Maharashtra

B933’

read:

| ‘Garg Inox | Bahadurgarh, Haryana and Pune, Maharashtra | B931 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| .... | | |
| Nevatia Steel & Alloys | Mumbai, Maharashtra | B933’. |

‘Garg Inox

Bahadurgarh, Haryana and Pune, Maharashtra

B931

....

Nevatia Steel & Alloys

Mumbai, Maharashtra

B933’.

---
§ 718.104 Late-filed and revised acreage reports. ( a ) Late-filed acreage reports may be accepted after the final reporting date through the crop's immediately subsequent crop year's final reporting date and processed by FSA if both of the following apply: ( 1 ) The crop or identifiable crop residue remains in the field, permitting FSA to verify and determine the acreage and
( 2 ) The crop acreage and common land unit for which the reported crop acreage report is being filed has not already been determined by FSA.
( b ) Acreage reports submitted later than the date specified in paragraph (a) of this section will not be processed by FSA and will not be used for program purposes.
( c ) The person or legal entity filing a report late must pay the cost of a farm inspection and measurement unless FSA determines that failure to report in a timely manner was beyond the producer's control. The cost of the inspection and measurement is equal to the amount FSA would charge for measurement service; however, FSA's determination of acreage as a result of the inspection and measurement is not considered a paid for measurement service under § 718.101. The acreage measured will be entered as determined acres.
( d ) When an acceptable late-filed acreage report is filed in accordance with this section, the reported crop acreage will be entered for the amount that was actually reported to FSA before FSA determined acres, and the determined crop acreage will be entered as it was determined and established by FSA.
( e ) Revised acreage reports may be filed to change the acreage reported if: ( 1 ) The acreage has not already been determined by FSA; and
( 2 ) Actual crop or residue is present in the field.
( f ) Revised reports will be filed and accepted: ( 1 ) At any time for all crops if the crop or residue still exists in the field for inspection to verify the existence and use made of the crop, the lack of the crop, or a disaster condition affecting the crop; and
( 2 ) If the producer was in compliance with all other program requirements at the reporting date.
[71 FR 13742, Mar. 17, 2006, as amended as 80 FR 41996, July 16, 2015; 84 FR 45887, Sept. 3, 2019]
Subpart 5611.2 - USING AND MAINTAINING

REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENTS

Parent topic: Part 5611 - DESCRIBING AGENCY NEEDS

5611.274 Item identification and valuation.

5611.274-90 Item Unique Item Identification (IUID)/Unique Item Identifier

(UII) and Military Equipment Evaluation (MEV).

(Revised December 2015)

It is USSOCOM policy that IUIDs or DOD recognized UID equivalents, shall be incorporated in

solicitations and contracts in accordance with DFARS 211.274 . DFARS clause 252.211-7003 shall be

incorporated into any solicitation and contract for procurement of tangible assets as directed by the

Program Manager in the procurement request package.

In accordance with DFARS 211.274-3, contractors shall be required to identify the Government’s

unit acquisition cost for all items delivered, even if none of the criteria for placing a unique item

identification mark applies. DFARS 252.211-7003(a) defines unit acquisition cost.

Follow procedures found in the DCG for IUID/UII and MEV.
**Exhibit 35.1**

** **

**WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK**

** **

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATEANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

            I, H. John Berens, an authorized officer of Washington Mutual Bank (the “Servicer”), do hereby certify toWaMu Asset Acceptance Corp. (the “Depositor”), pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of  September 1, 2006 (as amended, the “Servicing Agreement”) by and between the Depositor, the Servicer, LaSalle Bank,National Association, as Trustee, and Christiana Bank & Trust Company, as Delaware Trustee the following with respect to WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2006-AR12 for the 2006 fiscal year  (the “Relevant Year”):

 

 

1.        A review of the activities of the Servicer during the Relevant Year and of performance under the ServicingAgreement has been made under my supervision.

2.        To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theServicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Relevant Year.

 

 

 

Dated as of February 22, 2007.

                                                                                   

 
| /s/ H. John Berens

___________________________________________

Name:  H. John Berens

Title:    Senior Vice President |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
§ 770.9 Appraisals. ( a ) The applicant or the borrower, as appropriate, will pay the cost of any appraisal required under this part.
( b ) Appraisals must be completed in accordance with § 761.7 of this chapter.
8.004 Use of other sources.

If an agency is unable to satisfy requirements for supplies and services from the mandatory sources

listed in 8.002 and 8.003, agencies are encouraged to consider satisfying requirements from or

through the non-mandatory sources listed in paragraph (a) of this section (not listed in any order of

priority) before considering the non-mandatory source listed in paragraph (b) of this section. When

satisfying requirements from non-mandatory sources, see 7.105(b) and part 19 regarding

consideration of small business, veteran-owned small business, service-disabled veteran-owned small

business, HUBZone small business, small disadvantaged business (including 8(a) participants), and

women-owned small business concerns.

(a)

(1) Supplies. Federal Supply Schedules, Governmentwide acquisition contracts, multi-agency

contracts, and any other procurement instruments intended for use by multiple agencies, including

blanket purchase agreements (BPAs) under Federal Supply Schedule contracts (e.g., Federal

Strategic Sourcing Initiative (FSSI) agreements accessible at http://www.gsa.gov/fssi (see also

5.601)).

(2) Services. Agencies are encouraged to consider Federal Prison Industries, Inc., as well as the

sources listed in paragraph (a)(1) of this section (see subpart 8.6).

(b) Commercial sources (including educational and non-profit institutions) in the open market.

Parent topic: Part 8 - Required Sources of Supplies and Services
#### § 58.314 General construction, repair and installation.

All equipment and utensils necessary to the manufacture of butter and related products shall meet the same general requirements as outlined in § 58.128. In addition for certain other equipment, the following requirements shall be met.
#### § 56.60 Who may request an appeal grading or review of a grader's decision.

An appeal grading may be requested by any interested party who is dissatisfied with the determination by a grader of the class, quality, quantity, or condition of any product as evidenced by the USDA grademark and accompanying label, or as stated on a grading certificate and a review may be requested by the operator of an official plant with respect to a grader's decision or on any other matter related to grading in the official plant.
252.223-7007 Safeguarding Sensitive Conventional Arms, Ammunition, and Explosives.       As prescribed in 223.7203 , use the following clause:          Safeguarding Sensitive Conventional Arms,             Ammunition, and Explosives (NOV 2023)          (a) *Definition*. As used in this clause—          “Arms, ammunition, and explosives (AA&E),” means those items within the scope  of DoD Manual 5100.76, Physical Security of Sensitive Conventional Arms, Ammunition, and Explosives.          (b) The requirements of DoD Manual 5100.76 apply to the following items of AA&E being developed, produced, manufactured, or purchased for the Government, or provided to the Contractor as Government-furnished property under this contract:          NOMENCLATURE                      NATIONAL STOCK NUMBER                      SENSITIVITY/CATEGORY(c) The Contractor shall comply with the requirements of DoD Manual 5100.76, as specified in the statement of work. The edition of DoD Manual 5100.76 in effect on the date of issuance of the solicitation for this contract shall apply.          (d) The Contractor shall allow representatives             of the              Defense Counterintelligence and             Security Agency (DCSA), and representatives of other             appropriate offices of the Government, access at all reasonable             times into its facilities and those of its subcontractors, for the             purpose of performing surveys, inspections, and investigations             necessary to review compliance with the physical security standards             applicable to this contract.          (e) The Contractor shall notify the cognizant DCSA field office of any subcontract involving AA&E within 10 days after award of the subcontract.          (f) Subcontracts. The Contractor shall ensure that the requirements of this clause are included in all subcontracts, at every tier—          (1) For the development, production, manufacture, or purchase of AA&E; or          (2) When AA&E will be provided to the subcontractor as Government-furnished property.          (g) Nothing in this clause shall relieve the Contractor of its responsibility for complying with applicable Federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, codes, and regulations (including requirements for obtaining licenses and permits) in connection with the performance of this contract.          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 252.223 RESERVED
Subpart 229.70 - SPECIAL PROCEDURES FOR OVERSEAS CONTRACTS       To obtain tax relief for overseas contracts, follow the procedures at PGI 229.70.    **Parent topic:** Part 229 - TAXES
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cr-169-WKW

)

WILLIAM EARL ULMER )

ORDER

Upon consideration of Defendant William Earl Ulmer’s Motion to Discharge Counsel,

and for good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED. It is ORDERED that Defendant’s

counsel, Timothy C. Halstrom, is DISCHARGED.

Done this 4th day of September, 2008.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 685 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 1 of 1
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3021 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Cerous nitrate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 24, 2006 

Mr. REID (for Mr. ROCKEFELLER) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Cerous nitrate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CEROUS NITRATE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.28.34 Cerous nitrate (CAS No. 

10294–41–4) (provided for 

in subheading 2834.29.50) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 
2 

•S 3021 IS 

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of

- )

)

Oklahoma Department of Rehabilitation

Services )

) ASBCA No. 62263

)

Under Contract No. W9124L

- 19

- D

- 0001 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT : Grant E. Moak, Esq.

Assistant Attorney General

Oklahoma City, OK

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Scott N. Flesch, Esq.

Army Chief Trial Attorney

MAJ Nicholas Lucchetti, JA

Trial Attorney

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: January 25 , 2021

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62263

, Appeal of Oklahoma

Department of Rehabilitation Services , rendered in conformance with the Board’s

Charter.

Dated: January 26, 2021 JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
§ 6.29 Use of licenses. ( a ) An article entered under a license shall be an article produced in the country specified on the license.
( b ) An article entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption under a license must be entered in the name of the licensee as the importer of record by the licensee or its agent, and must be owned by the licensee at the time of such entry.
( c ) If the article entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption was purchased by the licensee through a direct sale from a foreign supplier, the licensee shall present the following documents or their authorized electronic equivalent, when available, at the time of entry: ( 1 ) A true and correct copy of a through bill of lading from the country; and
( 2 ) A commercial invoice or bill of sale from the seller, showing the quantity and value of the product, the date of purchase and the country; or
( 3 ) Where the article was entered into warehouse by the foreign supplier, CBP Form 7501 endorsed by the foreign supplier, and the commercial invoice.
( d ) If the article entered was purchased by the licensee via sale-in-transit, the licensee shall present the following documents or their authorized electronic equivalent, when available, at the time of entry: ( 1 ) A true and correct copy of a through bill of lading endorsed by the original consignee of the goods;
( 2 ) A certified copy of the commercial invoice or bill of sale from the foreign supplier to the original consignee of the goods; and
( 3 ) A commercial invoice or bill of sale from the original consignee to the licensee.
( e ) If the article entered was purchased by the licensee in warehouse, the licensee shall present the following documents or their authorized electronic equivalent, when available, at the time of entry: ( 1 ) CBP Form 7501 endorsed by the original consignee of the goods;
( 2 ) A certified copy of the commercial invoice or bill of sale from the foreign supplier to the original consignee of the goods; and
( 3 ) A commercial invoice or bill of sale from the original consignee to the licensee.
( f ) The Licensing Authority may waive the requirements of paragraphs (c), (d) or (e), if it determines that because of strikes, lockouts or other unusual circumstances, compliance with those requirements would unduly interfere with the entry of such articles.
( g ) Nothing in this subpart shall prevent the use of immediate delivery in accordance with the provisions of CBP regulations relating to tariff-rate quotas.
[80 FR 44254, July 27, 2015, as amended at 81 FR 87802, Dec. 6, 2016]
# 252.239-7008 Reserved.

**Parent topic:**252.239 RESERVED
§ 4287.156 Protective advances. Protective advances are advances made by the lender for the purpose of preserving and protecting the collateral where the debtor has failed to, will not, or cannot meet its obligations. Lenders must exercise sound judgment in determining that the protective advance preserves collateral and recovery is actually enhanced by making the advance. Lenders cannot make protective advances in lieu of additional loans. A protective advance claim will be paid only at the time of the final report of loss payment. ( a ) The maximum loss to be paid by the Agency will never exceed the original loan amount plus accrued interest times the percentage of guarantee regardless of any protective advances made.
( b ) In the event of a final loss, protective advances will accrue interest at the note rate and will be guaranteed at the same percentage of guarantee as provided for in the Loan Note Guarantee. The guarantee will not cover interest on the protective advance accruing after 90 days from the most recent delinquency effective date.
( c ) Protective advances must constitute an indebtedness of the borrower to the lender and be secured by the security instruments. Agency written authorization is required when the cumulative total of protective advances exceeds $200,000 or 10 percent of the aggregate outstanding balance of principal and interest, whichever is less.
#### §§ 765.3-765.50 [Reserved]
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-11 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-11 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-11 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-11 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-11 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-11 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 6 of 6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

COURTNEY O. GATHERS,

Petitioner,

v. Case No.: 4:20cv587-MW/EMT

SECRETARY, FLORIDA

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

___________________________/ 

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report 

and Recommendation. ECF No. 19. Upon consideration, no objections having been 

filed by the parties,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation, ECF No. 19, is accepted and adopted as 

this Court’s opinion. Respondent’s motion to dismiss, ECF No. 10, is GRANTED. 

The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “Petitioner’s § 2254 petition for writ of 

habeas corpus, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED with prejudice as untimely.” The 

Case 4:20-cv-00587-MW-EMT Document 22 Filed 01/27/22 Page 1 of 2
2

certificate of appealability is DENIED. The Clerk shall close the file.

SO ORDERED on January 27, 2022.

s/Mark E. Walker 

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00587-MW-EMT Document 22 Filed 01/27/22 Page 2 of 2
(November 25, 1980)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Darryl Johnson, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered on June 9, 1980, unanimously affirmed. The underlying motion to suppress was properly denied for the reasons set forth in opinion of Ciparick, J. No opinion. Concur — Murphy, P.J., Kupferman, Sandler, Lupiano and Lynch, JJ.