alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2014121DE.01006001.xml

| 24.4.2014 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 121/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2014

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 121/60

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 269/2014 des Rates vom 17. März 2014 über restriktive Maßnahmen angesichts von Handlungen, die die territoriale Unversehrtheit, Souveränität und Unabhängigkeit der Ukraine untergraben oder bedrohen

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 78 vom 17. März 2014
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 78 vom 17. März 2014

Seite 7, Artikel 2 Absatz 1:

anstatt:

„(1)   Sämtliche Gelder und wirtschaftlichen Ressourcen, die Eigentum oder Besitz von in Anhang I aufgeführten natürlichen Personen oder mit diesen in Verbindung stehenden natürlichen oder juristischen Personen, Einrichtungen oder Organisationen sind oder von diesen gehalten oder kontrolliert werden, werden eingefroren.“

muss es heißen:

„(1)   Sämtliche Gelder und wirtschaftlichen Ressourcen, die im Eigentum oder Besitz der in Anhang I aufgeführten natürlichen Personen oder der dort aufgeführten mit ihnen in Verbindung stehenden natürlichen oder juristischen Personen, Einrichtungen oder Organisationen sind oder von diesen gehalten oder kontrolliert werden, werden eingefroren.“

Seite 7, Artikel 2 Absatz 2:

anstatt:

„(2)   Den in Anhang I aufgeführten natürlichen Personen oder mit diesen in Verbindung stehenden natürlichen oder juristischen Personen, Einrichtungen oder Organisationen dürfen weder ...“

muss es heißen:

„(2)   Den in Anhang I aufgeführten natürlichen Personen oder den dort aufgeführten mit diesen in Verbindung stehenden natürlichen oder juristischen Personen, Einrichtungen oder Organisationen dürfen weder ...“

---
52.247-24 Advance Notification by the

Government.

As prescribed in 47.207-8(a)(1), insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts for

transportation or for transportation-related services when the Government is responsible for

notifying the contractor of specific service times or unusual shipments:

Advance Notification by the Government (Apr 1984)

The Government will notify the Contractor ___ hours in advance of the number of pieces and weight

of all normal shipments and the time the shipment will be available for pickup. On other-than-normal

shipments, the Government will furnish additional information; e.g., dimension of oversized pieces,

as necessary to determine the amount of equipment and/or manpower needed to perform the

required services.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.247 [Reserved]
(October 30, 1980)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Leonard Bamberg, Appellant.

Judgment Supreme Court, New York County, rendered on March 21, 1979, unanimously affirmed. Application during call of calendar for permission to submit certain papers denied. No opinion. Concur —Murphy, P. J., Ross, Markewich, Lupiano and Carro, JJ.
5133.9001 Designation of grant appeal authority.    (a)  Procedures governing grants and cooperative agreements are set forth in Department of Defense Directive 3210.06, Defense Grant and Agreement Regulatory System (DGARS) and the Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) provisions cited in that directive.       (b)  32 CFR section 22.815(e)(1) requires the designation of grant appeal authorities to decide formal administrative appeals brought under 32 CFR section 22.815(e).       (c)  The head of the contracting activity (HCA) that awarded the grant or cooperative agreement shall serve as the grant appeal authority, provided that the individual is a general officer or member of the Senior Executive Service.  The grant appeal authority may utilize a board in accordance with 32 CFR section 22.815(e)(1). (d)  The HCA may not delegate grant appeal authority.  In the event that the HCA is not a general officer or member of the Senior Executive Service, the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army (Procurement) shall designate a qualified individual as the grant appeal authority on a case-by-case basis.       (d)  The grant appeal authority shall utilize the procedures specified in 32 CFR sections 22.815(e) and (f). **Parent topic:** Subpart 5133.90 - Grant and Cooperative Agreement Claims, Disputes and Appeals
#### § 906.28 Procedure.

Ten members of the committee shall be necessary to constitute a quorum, six of whom shall be producer members. Ten affirmative votes shall be required to pass any motion or approve any committee action. All votes shall be cast in person.
UNION ACQUISITION CORP.
400 Madison Ave, Suite 11A
New York, NY 10017


February 27, 2018


Atlantic-Pacific Capital, Inc.
400 Madison Ave, Suite 11A
New York, NY 10017


UCG International Corp.
400 Madison Ave, Suite 11A
New York, NY 10017


Ladies and Gentlemen:


This letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the registration statement (the “Registration Statement”) for the initial public offering (the “IPO”) of the securities of Union Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) and continuing until the earlier of (i) the consummation by the Company of an initial business combination or (ii) the Company’s liquidation (in each case as described in the Registration Statement) (such earlier date hereinafter referred to as the “Termination Date”), Atlantic-Pacific Capital, Inc. and UCG International Corp. shall make available to the Company certain office space and administrative and support services as may be required by the Company from time to time. In exchange therefor, the Company shall pay Atlantic-Pacific Capital, Inc. and UCG International Corp. the aggregate sum of $10,000 per month on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter until the Termination Date. Each of Atlantic-Pacific Capital, Inc. and UCG International Corp. hereby agrees that it does not have any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies that may be set aside in a trust account (the “Trust Account”) that may be established upon the consummation of the IPO as a result of this letter agreement (the “Claim”) and hereby waives any Claim it may have in the future as a result of, or arising out of, this letter agreement and will not seek recourse against the Trust Account with respect to this letter agreement for any reason whatsoever.


		Very truly yours,	 
			 	 
		UNION ACQUISITION CORP.
			 	 
			 	 
		By:	/s/ Kyle P. Bransfield	                
			 Name: Kyle P. Bransfield	 
			 Title:   Chief Executive Officer	 




AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:


ATLANTIC-PACIFIC CAPITAL, INC.


 


	By:	/s/ Anthony Bossone
	      	 Name: Anthony Bossone
		 Title: Chief Financial Officer
		 
	UCG INTERNATIONAL CORP.
		  
		  
	By:	 /s/ Juan Santori
		 Name: Juan Santori
		 Title: Chairman
###### Editorial Note on Part 91

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 91 appear at 61 FR 51350, Oct. 2 1996.

#### § 91.21 Protecting samples.

Laboratory personnel shall protect each sample from manipulation, substitution, and improper or careless handling which would deprive the sample of its representative character from the time of receipt in the laboratory until the analysis is completed and the sample has been discarded.
#### § 613.4 Special production of plant materials.

NRCS can produce plant materials in the quantity required to do a specific conservation job if this production will serve the public welfare and only if the plant materials are not available commercially. This function will be performed only until the plant materials are available commercially. Specific production of plant materials by NRCS requires the approval of the Chief.
Subpart 5619.2 - POLICIES

Parent topic: Part 5619 - SMALL BUSINESS AND SMALL DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS

CONCERNS

5619.201 - General Policy.

(Revised October 2010)

(d)(10)(1) The Small Business Coordination Record (DD 2579) shall be completed by the contract

specialist and reviewed by the Small Business Specialist on all acquisitions (including Federal

Supply Schedule orders) over $10,000, except those under the simplified acquisition threshold that

are totally set aside for small business concerns.

(2)Reserved.

(3)Attach the Market Research Report (see DCG) to the Small Business Coordination Record (DD

2579) when submitting the DD 2579 for approval of acquisitions above the simplified acquisition

threshold. Market research policies are located in FAR , DFARS , and SOFARS Part 10 .
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of MXenergy Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) forthe year ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Jeffrey A. Mayer, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, and Chaitu Parikh, Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

This certificationaccompanies each Report pursuant to Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 
| Date: July 8,  2010 | /s/ JEFFREY A.  MAYER                  |
|--------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                     | Jeffrey A. Mayer                       |
|                     | President and  Chief Executive Officer |
|                     | (Principal  executive officer)         |
|                     |                                   |
| Date: July 8,  2010 | /s/ CHAITU  PARIKH                     |
|                     | Chaitu Parikh                          |
|                     | Chief Financial  Officer               |
|                     | (Principal  financial officer)         |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Subpart 5616.3 - COSTREIMBURSEMENT CONTRACTS     **Parent topic:** Part 5616 - CONTRACT TYPES5616.307 Contract Clauses.    *(Revised November 2007)*       (j) Contracting officers shall insert a clause substantially the same as 5652.216-9000, Fixed Fee Information, in all cost plus fixed-fee type solicitations and contracts.       (k) Contracting officers may insert 5652.216-9002, Withholding of Fixed Fee or Incentive Fee, in cost-plus fixed fee or cost-plus incentive fee contracts where a reduced withholding percentage is negotiated in accordance with FAR 52.216-8, "Fixed Fee," or FAR 52.216-10, "Incentive Fee."       (l) Contracting officers shall insert a clause substantially the same as 5652.216-9005, Government Down Time for Various Reasons, including the President and the Secretary of Defense, in solicitations and contracts when award of a cost type contract is anticipated.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Charles H. Weed, Appellant.

(Argued April 22, *1884;*

decided April 29, 1884.)

*Francis Larkin*for appellant.

*Nelson R. Baker*for respondent.

Agree to affirm ; no opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
Case 1:06-mc-03331-MEF-TFM Document 1 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:06-mc-03331-MEF-TFM Document 1 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:06-mc-03331-MEF-TFM Document 1 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:06-mc-03331-MEF-TFM Document 1 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:06-mc-03331-MEF-TFM Document 1 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 5 of 5
Case 1:06-mc-03331-MEF-TFM Document 1-2 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 1 of 11
Case 1:06-mc-03331-MEF-TFM Document 1-2 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 2 of 11
Case 1:06-mc-03331-MEF-TFM Document 1-2 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 3 of 11
Case 1:06-mc-03331-MEF-TFM Document 1-2 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 4 of 11
Case 1:06-mc-03331-MEF-TFM Document 1-2 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 5 of 11
Case 1:06-mc-03331-MEF-TFM Document 1-2 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 6 of 11
Case 1:06-mc-03331-MEF-TFM Document 1-2 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 7 of 11
Case 1:06-mc-03331-MEF-TFM Document 1-2 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 8 of 11
Case 1:06-mc-03331-MEF-TFM Document 1-2 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 9 of 11
Case 1:06-mc-03331-MEF-TFM Document 1-2 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 10 of 11
Case 1:06-mc-03331-MEF-TFM Document 1-2 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 11 of 11
Case 1:06-mc-03331-MEF-TFM Document 1-3 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:06-mc-03331-MEF-TFM Document 1-3 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:06-mc-03331-MEF-TFM Document 1-3 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:06-mc-03331-MEF-TFM Document 1-3 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:06-mc-03331-MEF-TFM Document 1-3 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 5 of 5
Case 1:06-mc-03331-MEF-TFM Document 1-4 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:06-mc-03331-MEF-TFM Document 1-4 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:06-mc-03331-MEF-TFM Document 1-4 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:06-mc-03331-MEF-TFM Document 1-4 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 4 of 4
Case 1:06-mc-03331-MEF-TFM Document 1-5 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:06-mc-03331-MEF-TFM Document 1-5 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 2 of 6
Case 1:06-mc-03331-MEF-TFM Document 1-5 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:06-mc-03331-MEF-TFM Document 1-5 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 4 of 6
Case 1:06-mc-03331-MEF-TFM Document 1-5 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:06-mc-03331-MEF-TFM Document 1-5 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 6 of 6
Case 1:06-mc-03331-MEF-TFM Document 1-6 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 1 of 1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

845 

CA 12-01990 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, FAHEY, AND PERADOTTO, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF BAKER HALL, DOING BUSINESS 

AS BAKER VICTORY SERVICES, 

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CITY OF LACKAWANNA ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 

AND CITY OF LACKAWANNA, RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS. 

BOUVIER PARTNERSHIP, LLP, BUFFALO (NORMAN E.S. GREENE OF COUNSEL), FOR

RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS.

DAMON MOREY LLP, CLARENCE (COREY A. AUERBACH OF COUNSEL), FOR

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court,

Erie County (Timothy J. Walker, A.J.), entered July 25, 2012 in a

proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment granted in part

the petition and annulled the determination of respondent City of

Lackawanna Zoning Board of Appeals. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to

CPLR article 78 seeking, inter alia, to annul the determination of

respondent City of Lackawanna Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) that a

residential treatment facility (RTF) proposed by petitioner is not a

permitted use in the mixed residential (MR) district in which

petitioner sought to construct it. We conclude that Supreme Court

properly granted the petition to that extent. Although “[t]he

interpretation by a zoning board of its governing code is generally

entitled to great deference by the courts . . . , an interpretation

that runs counter to the clear wording of a [code] provision is given

little weight” (Matter of Emmerling v Town of Richmond Zoning Bd. of

Appeals, 67 AD3d 1467, 1467-1468 [internal quotation marks omitted]). 

Here, the ZBA’s determination that the proposed RTF is not permitted

in an MR district is contrary to the clear wording of Lackawanna City

Code (City Code) § 230-80 and the sections of the multiple residence

law that are incorporated by reference therein (see generally Matter

of McGrath v Town of Amherst Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 94 AD3d 1522,

1523-1524, lv denied 19 NY3d 809). 

Finally, we note that, inasmuch as petitioner did not take a
-2- 845 

CA 12-01990 

cross appeal from the judgment, it is precluded from obtaining the

affirmative relief it seeks (see Millard v Alliance Laundry Sys., LLC,

28 AD3d 1145, 1148; see generally Hecht v City of New York, 60 NY2d

57, 61). 

Entered: September 27, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: August 4, 2008/s/ LEO S. ULLMAN
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 233 (Monday, December 6, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75662-75663]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30672]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CHEMICAL SAFETY AND HAZARD INVESTIGATION BOARD


Sunshine Act Meeting

    In connection with its investigation into the April 20, 2010, 
explosion and fire that occurred on the BP/Transocean Deepwater Horizon 
oil rig, the United States Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation 
Board (CSB) announces that it will be holding an all day symposium 
entitled ``International Models of Offshore Oil Rig Regulation'' on 
Wednesday, December 15, 2010 in Washington, DC. The meeting will bring 
together international regulators, union representatives and industry 
groups' to discuss regulation of offshore drilling operations in the 
wake of the Deepwater Horizon accident.
    The meeting will be held from 9 a.m.-5 p.m. at the Embassy Suites 
Ballroom located at 1250 22nd Street Northwest in Washington, DC. The 
meeting is free and open to the public.
    The CSB's Board Members and BP Deepwater Horizon investigation team 
will hear testimony from leading safety experts involved in offshore 
drilling activities from countries including the United Kingdom, 
Australia and Norway. CSB Board Members and panel participants will be 
available to answer questions during a public comment period. The 
meeting will be available via webcast. All proceedings will be 
videotaped and an official transcript will be published.
    The CSB is an independent Federal agency charged with investigating 
industrial chemical accidents. The agency's board members are appointed 
by the president and confirmed by the Senate. CSB investigations look 
into all aspects of chemical accidents, including physical causes such 
as equipment failure as well as inadequacies in

[[Page 75663]]

regulations, industry standards, and safety management systems.

Christopher W. Warner,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010-30672 Filed 12-2-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6350-01-P
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Education Management LLC (the Company) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 (the
Report), I, Todd S. Nelson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify in such capacity, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: September 20, 2007



By:

/s/    TODD S.
NELSONTodd S. Nelson President and Chief Executive Officer
Case 2:06-cv-00633-MEF-VPM Document 8-2 Filed 09/26/2006 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00633-MEF-VPM Document 8-2 Filed 09/26/2006 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00633-MEF-VPM Document 8-2 Filed 09/26/2006 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00633-MEF-VPM Document 8-2 Filed 09/26/2006 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00633-MEF-VPM Document 8-2 Filed 09/26/2006 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00633-MEF-VPM Document 8-2 Filed 09/26/2006 Page 6 of 6
Exhibit 10.6


 


ESPEY MFG. & ELECTRONICS CORP.

DIRECTOR CONTINGENT SEVERANCE COMPENSATION AGREEMENT


 


This AGREEMENT is dated as of March 2, 2018 by
and between ESPEY MFG. & ELECTRONICS CORP., a New York corporation (the “Corporation”) and the undersigned member
of the Corporation’s Board of Directors (the “Director”).


 


Recitals


WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Corporation
has adopted the Director Contingent Severance Compensation Program (the “Program”), attached hereto as Exhibit A, which
provides for certain contingent severance payment rights to the Director, as well as other individuals currently serving as non-executive
directors of the Corporation;


WHEREAS, the Program provides that it shall be
evidenced by individual agreements between each director eligible for contingent severance payments and the Corporation;


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing
promises and covenants set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:


1.       Director
shall be a participant in the Program, as the same may be amended by the Board of Directors from time to time, and shall be entitled
to the contingent severance payments on the terms and conditions as set forth therein, provided that no amendment shall materially
reduce benefits or increase Director’s obligations without Director’s written consent.


2.       If
the Corporation breaches the terms and conditions of the Program, this Agreement shall be specifically enforceable by Director,
who shall also be entitled to the recovery of reasonable attorneys’ fees and the other costs of enforcement.


3.       This
Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors, assigns, heirs
and beneficiaries.


4.       This
Agreement supersedes the Retired Director Compensation Program and Mandatory Retirement Agreement between Director and the Corporation
dated as of May 10, 2011.


 


[signatures appear on the next page]




    6 


     

    


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this
Agreement to be executed as of the date first above written.


	 	ESPEY MFG. & ELECTRONICS CORP.
	 	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/  Patrick T. Enright, Jr.
	 	 	Name:	Patrick T. Enright, Jr.
	 	 	Title:	President and Chief Executive Officer
	 	 	 	 
	 	DIRECTOR
	 	 	 	 
	 	/s/ Paul J. Corr


 




 






    7