alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) 2:06-CR-169-WKW

)

JAMES CALVIN TALLEY )

GOVERNMENT’S MOTION FOR DOWNWARD DEPARTURE

AND CERTIFICATION OF SUBSTANTIAL ASSISTANCE

PURSUANT TO § 5K1.1, UNITED STATES SENTENCING GUIDELINES

COMES NOW the United States of America, by and through Leura G. Canary,

United States Attorney for the Middle District of Alabama, and files the above-captioned

motion, and as reasons therefore, submits the following:

1. Defendant entered a plea of guilty under Rule 11(c)(1)(C) to an indictment

charging violations of Title 21, United States Code, Sections 846 and 843(b), pursuant to

a plea agreement.

2. Defendant agreed to cooperate with the Government in the instant cause and

in subsequent investigations as necessary, and to waive his rights to appeal or collaterally

attack the guilty plea or sentence.

3. The United States submits the defendant has cooperated with the United States

and has abided by the terms of his plea agreement. The assistance provided by

Defendant should be considered substantial.

4. The Government is satisfied that Defendant is entitled to be considered for a

reduction of sentence under § 5K1.1 U.S.S.G., and moves this Court to reduce the

applicable offense level of Defendant by one level. 

Respectfully submitted, this the 28th day of January, 2008.

LEURA G. CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 525 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 1 of 3
s/A. Clark Morris

A. CLARK MORRIS

Assistant United States Attorney

131 Clayton Street

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334)223-7280

Fax: (334)223-7135

E-mail: clark. morris@usdoj.gov

ASB-1613-N77A

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 525 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 2 of 3
3

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) 2:06-CR-169-WKW

)

JAMES CALVIN TALLEY )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on January 28, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing with the

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to

the following: Richard Keith.

Respectfully submitted,

s/A. Clark Morris

A. CLARK MORRIS

Assistant United States Attorney 

131 Clayton Street 

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334)223-7280

Fax: (334)223-7135

E-mail: clark. morris@usdoj.gov

ASB-1613-N77A

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 525 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 3 of 3
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3109 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3109

To suspend temporarily the duty on contoured padded infant potty seats.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

 Mr. Brownback introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on contoured padded infant potty seats.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONTOURED PADDED INFANT POTTY SEATS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.39.24        Contoured padded        Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           infant potty seats                                                31/2009          ''
                           (provided for in                                                                    .
                           subheading
                           3924.90.55)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION

TERRY DEESE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 1:06cv643-MHT

) 

CHAMPION ENTERPRISES, )

INC., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion to dismiss and

alternative motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 5) are

denied with leave to renew after a reasonable opportunity

for discovery.

DONE, this the 22nd day of August, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 11 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 1 of 1
252.211-7005 Reserved.

Parent topic: 252.211 RESERVED
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3039 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Cohedur RL. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. GRAHAM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Cohedur RL. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COHEDUR RL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.11.63 Mixtures of resorcinal (CAS No. 108– 

46–3), hexamethylolmelamine ether 

(CAS No. 3089–11–0), and dibutyl 

phthalate (CAS No. 84–74–2) (provided 

for in subheading 3824.90.28) ................ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


sroberts on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•S 3039 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
618467-1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

ELRICK HARRIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

OPTION ONE MORTGAGE 

CORPORATION, H&R BLOCK 

MORTGAGE CORPORATION, 

PREMIER MORTGAGE 

FUNDING, INC.; AND MORGAN 

TITLE SERVICE, LLC,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CIVIL ACTION NO.

2:06-cv-630-ID

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

COME NOW the defendants, Option One Mortgage Corporation and H&R 

Block Mortgage Corporation and pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure certify the following:

1. H&R Block Mortgage Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation, is a 

wholly owned subsidiary of Option One Mortgage Corporation, a California 

corporation, and an indirectly, wholly owned subsidiary of H&R Block, Inc., a 

publicly traded company.

2. Option One Mortgage Corporation, a California corporation, is a 

wholly owned subsidiary of Block Financial Corporation, a Missouri corporation, 

Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 16 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 2
618467-1 2

and an indirectly, wholly owned subsidiary of H&R Block, Inc., a publicly traded 

company.

/s/ Stephen A. Walsh

Stephen A. Walsh

Attorney for Defendants

Option One Mortgage Corporation and 

H&R Block Mortgage Corporation

OF COUNSEL:

ADAMS AND REESE LLP

2100 Third Avenue North, Suite 1100

Birmingham, Alabama 35203-3367

Telephone: (205) 250-5000

Facsimile: (205) 250-5034

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 8th day of December, 2006, I electronically filed 

the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will 

send notification of such filing to the following:

Robert E. Kirby, Jr., Esq.

Smith, Hanson & Kirby, LLC

Attorney for Plaintiff

4401 Gary Avenue

Fairfield, AL 35064

Richard M. Allen, Esq.

Chad W. Bryan, Esq.

Capell & Howard

150 South Perry Street 

Montgomery, AL 36104

Benjamin J. Espy

Melton Espy & Williams, PC 

P. O. Drawer 5130 

Montgomery, AL 36103-5130

/s/ Stephen A. Walsh

OF COUNSEL

Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 16 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 2
Subpart 227.3 - PATENT RIGHTS UNDER GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS    **Parent topic:** Part 227 - PATENTS, DATA, AND COPYRIGHTS227.303 Contract clauses.       (1)  Use the clause at                 252.227-7039             , Patents—Reporting of Subject Inventions, in solicitations and contracts containing the clause at FAR 52.227-11, Patent Rights—Ownership by the Contractor.          (2)(i)  Use the clause at                 252.227-7038             , Patent Rights—Ownership by the Contractor (Large Business), instead of the clause at FAR 52.227-11, in solicitations and contracts for experimental, developmental, or research work if—          (A)  The contractor is other than a small business concern or nonprofit organization; and          (B)  No alternative patent rights clause is used in accordance with FAR 27.303(c) or (e).          (ii)  Use the clause with its Alternate I if—          (A)  The acquisition of patent rights for the benefit of a foreign government is required under a treaty or executive agreement;          (B)  The agency head determines at the time of award that it would be in the national interest to acquire the right to sublicense foreign governments or international organizations pursuant to any existing or future treaty or agreement; or          (C)  Other rights are necessary to effect a treaty or agreement, in which case Alternate I may be appropriately modified.          (iii)  Use the clause with its Alternate II in long-term contracts if necessary to effect treaty or agreements to be entered into.227.304 Procedures.    227.304-1 General.       Interim and final invention reports and notification of all subcontracts for experimental, developmental, or research work may be submitted on DD Form 882, Report of Inventions and Subcontracts.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3051 

To suspend temporarily the duty on synthetic staple fiber of polyester. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. CARPER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on synthetic staple fiber 

of polyester. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SYNTHETIC STAPLE FIBER OF POLYESTER. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.55.05 Synthetic staple fiber of polyester; cruciform (tetralobal) cross section measuring 1.2 to 1.7 decitex (provided for in 

subheading 5503.20.00) .......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


sroberts on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•S 3051 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
19–008

107TH CONGRESS REPORT " HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ! 2d Session 107–776

WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(a) OF RULE XIII WITH RESPECT 

TO THE SAME DAY CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED BY THE RULES COMMITTEE

NOVEMBER 13 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 12), 2002.—Referred to the House 

Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 603] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 603, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives clause 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring a twothirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is reported from 

the Rules Committee) against certain resolutions reported from the 

Rules Committee. The rule applies the waiver to any special rule 

reported on the legislative day of Wednesday, November 13, 2002, 

providing for the consideration or disposition of a joint resolution 

making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2003.

Æ
!

!

!

!

!

!

TUALATIN 

RIVER 

NWR

BASKETT SLOUGH NWR

ANKENY NWR

WILLIAM L. FINLEY NWR

DUNGENESS

NWR

PROTECTION

ISLAND

NWR

GRAYS 

HARBOR

NWR

WILLAPA

NWR

JULIA BUTLER HANSEN

REFUGE FOR THE COLUMBIAN 

WHITE TAIL DEER

SILETZ BAY 

NWR

STEIGERWALD LAKE NWR

FRANZ LAKE NWR

PIERCE NWR

BANDON

MARSH

NWR 

NESTUCCA 

BAY NWR

BLACK RIVER 

UNIT

P

a

c i f i c

O

c

e

a

n

WASHINGTON

OREGON

CALIFORNIA NEVADA

IDAHO

Nisqually National 

Wildlife Refuge

¥¦§5

¥¦§90

¥¦§84

¥¦§82

Salem

Eugene

Tacoma Olympia

Seattle

Portland

OREGON 

ISLANDS

NWR 

COPALIS 

NWR

FLATTERY 

ROCKS 

NWR

QUILLAYUTE

NEEDLES 

NWR

LEWIS AND 

CLARK NWR

RIDGEFIELD NWR

SAN JUAN 

ISLANDS

NWR

THREE ARCH

ROCKS NWR

CAPE MEARES

NWR

Area

Enlarged

Pacific 

Flyway

Regional Context

Figure 1.1-1

1-3

N

Source: USFWS, 2000; Ducks Unlimited, 1999; EDAW, 2002 P:\0e01401 Nisqually\GIS\mxd\Figure1.1-1.mxd

Chapter 1 Introduction

Legend

National Wildlife Refuge

North Pacific Coast Ecoregion

Nisqually River Watershed

Nisqually NWR Draft CCP/EIS
252.247-7026 Evaluation Preference for Use

of Domestic Shipyards — Applicable to

Acquisition of Carriage by Vessel for DoD

Cargo in the Coastwise or Noncontiguous

Trade.

As prescribed in 247.574 (d), use the following provision:

EVALUATION PREFERENCE FOR USE OF DOMESTIC SHIPYARDS — APPLICABLE TO

ACQUISITION OF CARRIAGE BY VESSEL FOR DOD CARGO IN THE COASTWISE OR

NONCONTIGUOUS TRADE (NOV 2008)

(a) Definitions. As used in this provision—

“Covered vessel” means a vessel—

(1) Owned, operated, or controlled by the offeror; and

(2) Qualified to engage in the carriage of cargo in the coastwise or noncontiguous trade under

Section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 U.S.C. 12101, 12132, and 55102), commonly

referred to as “Jones Act”; 46 U.S.C. 12102, 12112, and 12119; and Section 2 of the Shipping Act,

1916 (46 U.S.C. 50501).

“Foreign shipyard” means a shipyard that is not a U.S. shipyard.

“Overhaul, repair, and maintenance work” means work requiring a shipyard period greater than or

equal to 5 calendar days.

“Shipyard” means a facility capable of performing overhaul, repair, and maintenance work on

covered vessels.

“U.S. shipyard” means a shipyard that is located in any State of the United States or in Guam.

(b) This solicitation includes an evaluation criterion that considers the extent to which the offeror

has had overhaul, repair, and maintenance work for covered vessels performed in U.S. shipyards.

(c) The offeror shall provide the following information with its offer, addressing all covered vessels

for which overhaul, repair, and maintenance work has been performed during the period covering

the current calendar year, up to the date of proposal submission, and the preceding four calendar

years:

(1) Name of vessel.

(2) Description and cost of qualifying shipyard work performed in U.S. shipyards.

(3) Description and cost of qualifying shipyard work performed in foreign shipyards and whether—
(i) Such work was performed as emergency repairs in foreign shipyards due to accident, emergency,

Act of God, or an infirmity to the vessel, and safety considerations warranted taking the vessel to a

foreign shipyard; or

(ii) Such work was paid for or reimbursed by the U.S. Government.

(4) Names of shipyards that performed the work.

(5) Inclusive dates of work performed.

(d) Offerors are responsible for submitting accurate information. The Contracting Officer—

(1) Will use the information to evaluate offers in accordance with the criteria specified in the

solicitation; and

(2) Reserves the right to request supporting documentation if determined necessary in the proposal

evaluation process.

(e) The Department of Defense will provide the information submitted in response to this provision

to the congressional defense committees, as required by Section 1017 of Pub. L. 109-364.

(End of provision)

Parent topic: 252.247 RESERVED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) 2:06-CR-169-WKW

)

WILLIAM EARL ULMER )

MOTION TO DECREASE DEFENDANT’S OFFENSE LEVEL

PURSUANT TO § 3E1.1(b), UNITED STATES SENTENCING GUIDELINES

(ACCEPTANCE OF RESPONSIBILITY)

COMES NOW the United States of America, by and through Leura G. Canary,

United States Attorney for the Middle District of Alabama, and files the above-captioned

Motion, and as reasons therefore, submits the following:

1. Defendant qualifies for a reduction in Defendant’s sentence pursuant to U.S.S.G

§ 3E1.1(b) as Defendant assisted authorities in the investigation and prosecution of

Defendant’s own misconduct by timely notifying authorities of Defendant’s intention to

enter a plea of guilty, thereby permitting the United States to avoid preparing for trial and

permitting the Government and this Court to allocate their resources efficiently.

2. Accordingly, pursuant to U.S.S.G § 3E1.1(b), the United States respectfully

moves this Court to reduce the Defendant’s offense level by one level. Combined with the

two-level reduction applied to Defendant’s offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1(a),

a total reduction of three levels should be applied to Defendant’s offense level for

Defendant’s acceptance of responsibility.

Respectfully submitted this the 29 day of January, 2008. th

LEURA G. CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

s/A. Clark Morris

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 531 Filed 01/29/2008 Page 1 of 3
A. CLARK MORRIS

Assistant United States Attorney

131 Clayton Street

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334)223-7280

Fax: (334)223-7135

E-mail: clark. morris@usdoj.gov

ASB-1613-N77A

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 531 Filed 01/29/2008 Page 2 of 3
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) 2:06-CR-169-WKW

)

WILLIAM EARL ULMER )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on January 29, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing with

the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such

filing to the following: Timothy Halstrom.

Respectfully submitted,

s/A. Clark Morris

A. CLARK MORRIS

Assistant United States Attorney 

131 Clayton Street 

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334)223-7280

Fax: (334)223-7135

E-mail: clark. morris@usdoj.gov

ASB-1613-N77A

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 531 Filed 01/29/2008 Page 3 of 3
§ 770.6 Rates and terms. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 65063 , Aug. 8, 2024.
( a ) *Term.* Each loan will be scheduled for repayment over a period not to exceed 40 years from the date of the note.
( b ) *Interest rate.* The interest rate charged by the Agency will be the lower of the interest rate in effect at the time of the loan approval or loan closing, which is the current rate available in any FSA office. Except as provided in § 770.10(b) the interest rate will be fixed for the life of the loan.
#### Judith A. Brown v. Barry K. Brown.

Motion denied. Defendant has sought and been granted the same relief in the Supreme Court, Special Term, as is sought by this motion. An appeal from the order of the Supreme Court has been taken, and defendant by this motion cannot be allowed to circumvent such appeal. He should be bound by his election to proceed in the Supreme Court (cf. *Drescher Rotberg Co.*v. *Landeker,*82 Misc. 441). Concur — McGivern, J. P., Markewich, Nunez, McNally and Steuer, JJ.
234.005-1 Competition.

A contract that is initially awarded from the competitive selection of a proposal resulting from a

broad agency announcement ( see 235.016) may contain a contract line item or contract option

using funds not limited to those identified in 235.016 for the development and demonstration or

initial production of technology developed under the contract, or the delivery of initial or additional

items if the item or a prototype thereof is created as the result of work performed under the contract

, only when it adheres to the following limitations:

(1) The contract line item or contract option shall be limited to the delivery of the minimal amount of

initial or additional items or prototypes that will allow for timely competitive solicitation and award

of a follow-on development or production contract for those items.

(2) The term of the contract line item or contract option shall be for not more than 2 years.

(3) The dollar value of the work to be performed pursuant to the contract line item or contract

option shall not exceed $100 million in fiscal year 2017 constant dollars. (10 U.S.C. 4004)

(4) See PGI 234.005-1 for guidance on providing, upon request, the benefits derived from use of this

competitive selection method.

Parent topic: 234.005 General requirements.
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Video Display Corporation;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 c)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.
 Date: October 15, 2008
    /s/ Gregory L. OsbornGregory L. OsbornChief Financial Officer