alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit

__________________________ 

KIMBERLY RENEE BRITTON, 

Petitioner, 

v.

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, 

Respondent.

__________________________ 

2013-3076

__________________________ 

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. CH3443130089-I-1.

__________________________ 

ON MOTION

__________________________ 

O R D E R

Kimberly Renee Britton moves for leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis. 

This court notes that this petition was dismissed on 

March 25, 2013 for failure to submit the Federal Circuit 

Rule 15(c) statement. The Rule 15(c) statement was filed 

on April 4, 2013. We treat Ms. Britton’s motion for leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis as including a motion to 

reinstate the case. 

Case: 13-3076 Document: 11 Page: 1 Filed: 04/26/2013
KIMBERLY BRITTON v. TREASURY 2

Upon consideration thereof, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

(1) The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 

is denied. 

(2) If the petitioner pays the docketing fee within 30 

days of this order, the motion to reinstate will be granted, 

the mandate will be recalled, the court’s dismissal order 

will be vacated, and the petition will be reinstated. If the 

case is reinstated, the respondent should calculate the 

due date for its brief from the date of reinstatement. 

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

 Jan Horbaly

 Clerk

s24 

Case: 13-3076 Document: 11 Page: 2 Filed: 04/26/2013
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 237 (Friday, December 10, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 76940]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31028]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Parts 1 and 301

[REG-100194-10]
RIN 1545-BJ52


Specified Tax Return Preparers Required To File Individual Income 
Tax Returns Using Magnetic Media; Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Correction to notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of 
public hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to a notice of proposed 
rulemaking (REG-100194-10) that was published in the Federal Register 
on Friday, December 3, 2010 (75 FR 75439). The proposed regulations 
provide further guidance relating to the requirement for ``specified 
tax return prepares,''.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Keith L. Brau at (202) 622-4940 (not a 
toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    The notice of proposed rulemaking that is the subject of this 
document is under section 6011 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Need for Correction

    As published, the notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-100194-10) 
contains an error that is misleading and is in need of clarification.

Correction to Publication

    Accordingly, the notice of proposed rulemaking which was the 
subject of FR Doc. 2010-30500 is corrected as follows:
    On page 75442, in the preamble, column 2, under the heading 
``Comments and Public Hearing'', line 17 from the bottom of the page, 
the language ``for Tuesday, January 7, 2011 at 10 a.m.'' is corrected 
to read ``for Friday, January 7, 2011 at 10 a.m.''

Guy Traynor,
Federal Register Liaison, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal 
Processing Division, Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and 
Administration).
[FR Doc. 2010-31028 Filed 12-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

§ 868.35 Sampling provisions by level of service. ( a ) *Original inspection service* — ( 1 ) *Lot inspection service.* Each original lot inspection service shall be made on the basis of one or more representative samples obtained by official personnel from the commodity in the lot and forwarded to the appropriate location.
( 2 ) *Submitted sample service.* Each original submitted sample inspection service shall be performed on the basis of the sample as submitted.
( b ) *Retest inspection service.* Each retest inspection service performed on a commodity lot or a submitted sample shall be based on an analysis of the file sample.
( c ) *Appeal inspection service* — ( 1 ) *Lot inspection service.* Each appeal inspection service on a commodity lot shall be made on the basis of a file sample or, upon request, a new sample.
( 2 ) *Submitted sample service.* Each appeal inspection service on the commodity in a submitted sample shall be based on an analysis of the file sample.
( d ) *Board appeal inspection service.* Each Board appeal inspection service performed on a commodity lot or submitted sample shall be based on an analysis of the file sample.
( e ) *Use of file samples* — ( 1 ) *Requirements for use.* A file sample that is retained by official personnel in accordance with the procedures prescribed in the instructions shall be considered representative for retest inspection, appeal inspection, and Board appeal inspection service if: ( i ) The file samples have remained at all times in the custody and control of the official personnel that performed the inspection service and
( ii ) the official personnel who performed the inspection service in question and those who are to perform the retest inspection, the appeal inspection, or the Board appeal inspection service determines that the samples were representative of the commodity at the time the inspection service was performed and that the quality or condition of the commodity in the samples has not since changed.
( 2 ) *Certificate statement.* The certificate for a retest inspection, appeal inspection, or Board appeal inspection service which is based on a file sample shall show the statement “Results based on file sample.”
Case 2:06-cv-00632-WKW-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00632-WKW-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00632-WKW-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00632-WKW-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00632-WKW-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00632-WKW-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 6 of 6
52.247-38 F.o.b. Inland Carrier, Point of Exportation.       As prescribed in 47.303-10(c), insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts when the delivery term is f.o.b. inland carrier, point of exportation:          F.o.b. Inland Carrier, Point of Exportation (Feb 2006)                                       (a) 						            The term "f.o.b. inland carrier, point of exportation," as used in this clause, means free of expense to the Government, on board the conveyance of the inland carrier, delivered to the specified point of exportation.                                          (b) 						            The Contractor shall-                                                         (1)                                                                           (i) 										                    Pack and mark the shipment to comply with contract specifications; or                                                                              (ii) 										                    In the absence of specifications, prepare the shipment for ocean transportation in conformance with carrier requirements to protect the goods and to ensure assessment of the lowest applicable transportation charge;                                                                                                           (2) 								                Prepare and distribute commercial bills of lading or other transportation receipt;                                                            (3)                                                                           (i) 										                    Deliver the shipment in good order and condition in or on the conveyance of the carrier on the date or within the period specified; and                                                                              (ii) 										                    Pay and bear all applicable charges, including transportation costs, to the point of delivery specified in the contract;                                                                                                           (4) 								                Be responsible for any loss of and/or damage to the goods occurring before delivery of the shipment to the point of delivery in the contract; and                                                            (5) 								                At the Government’s request and expense, assist in obtaining the documents required for-                                                                           (i) 										                    Exportation; or                                                                              (ii) 										                    Importation at destination.                                                                                                                   (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.247 [Reserved]
#### AUDITORIUM CO. v. SAM S. SHUBERT BOOKING AGENCY.

(Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.

July 28, 1914.)

Judgment (§ 852*)—Stay of Proceedings.

Under Code Civ. Proc. § 775, providing that an order to stay proceedings for more than 20 days shall not be made by a judge out of court except to stay proceedings upon an order or judgment appealed from, the court, where no appeal had been taken and there was therefore no “judgment appealed from,” had no power ex parte to grant a stay for longer than 20 days, and the stay would be reduced to that period.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Judgment, Cent. Dig. § 1564; Dec. Dig. § 852.*]

Action by the Auditorium Company against the Sam S. Shubert Booking Agency. Motion by plaintiff to vacate an order granted ex parte and without security, staying all proceedings on the part of the plaintiff of the execution of the judgment until 30 days after service of the said judgment with notice of entry thereof. Modified.

See, also, 148 N. Y. Supp. 1104.

Louis Sturcke, of New York City, for the motion.

William Klein, of New York City, for opposed.

*

For other cases see same topic *&*§ number in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, *&*Rep’r Indexes

GIEGERICH, J.

The papers before the judge who granted the ex parte order showed that an appeal was to be taken to the Court of Appeals. The only authority for granting a stay in such a case is found in section 775 of the Code. Section 1351 relates only to appeals to the Appellate Division. Under section 775 the judge to whom the application was made had power to grant a stay for 20 days, but as no appeal had yet been taken and there was therefore no “judgment appealed from,” in the language of section 775 he had no power to grant a longer stay.

The order must be modified so as to reduce the stay to one of 20 days.
52.219-18 Notification of Competition

Limited to Eligible 8(a) Participants.

As prescribed in 19.811-3(d), insert the following clause:

Notification of Competition Limited to Eligible 8(a) Participants (Oct 2022)

(a) Offers are solicited only from—

(1) Small business concerns expressly certified by the Small Business Administration (SBA) for

participation in SBA's 8(a) program and which meet the following criteria at the time of submission

of offer—

(i) The Offeror is in conformance with the 8(a) support limitation set forth in its approved business

plan; and

(ii) The Offeror is in conformance with the Business Activity Targets set forth in its approved

business plan or any remedial action directed by SBA;

(2) A joint venture, in which at least one of the 8(a) program participants that is a party to the joint

venture complies with the criteria set forth in paragraph (a)(1) of this clause, that complies with 13

CFR 124.513(c); or

(3) A joint venture—

(i) That is comprised of a mentor and an 8(a) protégé with an approved mentor-protégé agreement

under the 8(a) program;

(ii) In which at least one of the 8(a) program participants that is a party to the joint venture complies

with the criteria set forth in paragraph (a)(1) of this clause; and

(iii) That complies with 13 CFR 124.513(c).

(b) By submission of its offer, the Offeror represents that it meets the applicable criteria set forth in

paragraph (a) of this clause.

(c) Any award resulting from this solicitation will be made to the Small Business Administration,

which will subcontract performance to the successful 8(a) offeror selected through the evaluation

criteria set forth in this solicitation. A contracting officer may consider a joint venture for contract

award. SBA does not approve joint ventures for competitive awards, but see 13 CFR 124.501(g) for

SBA's determination of participant eligibility.

(d) The ____________ [insert name of SBA's contractor]will notify the____________ [insert name of

contracting agency]Contracting Officer in writing immediately upon entering an agreement (either

oral or written) to transfer all or part of its stock.

(End of clause)

Alternate I (Mar 2023). If the competition is to be limited to 8(a) participants within one or more

specific SBA regions or districts, add the following paragraph (a)(1)(iii) to paragraph (a) of the
clause:

(iii) The offeror's approved business plan is on the file and serviced by __ [ Contracting Officer

completes by inserting the appropriate SBA District and/or Area Office(s) as identified by the SBA].

Parent topic: 52.219 [Reserved]
§ 7.10 Conduct of county committee elections. ( a ) The county committee serving at the time of the election will be responsible for the conduct of the county committee election in accordance with the Uniform Guidelines and with any instructions issued by the Deputy Administrator.
( b ) County committee elections must not be associated with, or held in conjunction with, any other election or referendum conducted for any other purpose.
( c ) The county committee must give advance public notice at least 30 calendar days prior to the election date of how, when, and where eligible voters may vote.
( d ) The county committee must provide at least 10 calendar days of public notice of the date, time, and place at which election ballots will be opened and counted.
( e ) The county committee must provide at least 10 calendar days of public notice that any person may observe the opening and counting of the election ballots.
( f ) The county executive director must notify all nominees of the outcome of the election within 5 calendar days of the election date. The notification must be in writing.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION

TERRY DEESE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 1:06cv643-MHT

) 

CHAMPION ENTERPRISES, )

INC., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion to extend (doc. no. 17)

is granted.

DONE, this the 3rd day of October, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 19 Filed 10/03/2006 Page 1 of 1
§ 60.128 United States country of origin. *United States country of origin* means in the case of: ( a ) - ( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) Farm-raised Fish and Shellfish: From fish or shellfish hatched, raised, harvested, and processed in the United States, and that has not undergone a substantial transformation (as established by U.S. Customs and Border Protection) outside of the United States.
( d ) Wild-fish and Shellfish: From fish or shellfish harvested in the waters of the United States or by a U.S. flagged vessel and processed in the United States or aboard a U.S. flagged vessel, and that has not undergone a substantial transformation (as established by U.S. Customs and Border Protection) outside of the United States.
( e ) - ( f ) [Reserved]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Martin Taveras, Also Known as Jose Martin Tavares, Also Known as Jose Taveras, Appellant.

Submitted July 30, 2007;

decided September 6, 2007

Reported below, 2007 NY Slip Op 65977(U).

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Robert S. Dean, Esq., Center for Appellate Litigation, 74 Trinity Place, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10006 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
#### §§ 764.306-764.350 [Reserved]
239.7604 Solicitation  provision and contract clause.       (a) Use the provision at 252.239-7009 , Representation of Use of Cloud Computing, in solicitations, including solicitations using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services, for information technology services.          (b) Use the clause at 252.239-7010 , Cloud Computing Services, in solicitations and contracts, including solicitations and contracts using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services, for information technology services.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 239.76 - CLOUD COMPUTING
Exhibit 4.1








SECRETARY


NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED BY TRANSFER AGENT


INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA


LEAFBUYER


TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


AUTHORIZED COMMON STOCK: 150,000,000 SHARES


PAR VALUE: $0.001


Shares of Leafbuyer Technologies, Inc. Common Stock


CEO


CUSIP NO. 52177H 10 0


LEAFBUYER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


NEVADA


Countersigned & Registered: Globex Transfer, LLC


(813) 344-4490
252.247-7028 Application for U.S.

Government Shipping

Documentation/Instructions.

As prescribed in 247.207 , use the following clause:

APPLICATION FOR U.S. GOVERNMENT SHIPPING DOCUMENTATION/INSTRUCTIONS (JUN

2012)

(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this clause, the Contractor shall request bills of lading by

submitting a DD Form 1659, Application for U.S. Government Shipping Documentation/Instructions,

to the—

(1) Transportation Officer, if named in the contract schedule; or

(2) Contract administration office.

(b) If an automated system is available for shipment requests, use service/agency systems (e.g.,

Navy’s Global Freight Management–Electronic Transportation Acquisition (GFM-ETA) and Financial

Air Clearance Transportation System (FACTS) Shipment Processing Module, Air Force’s Cargo

Movement Operations System, DCMA’s Shipment Instruction Request (SIR) E-tool, and DLA’s

Distribution Standard System Vendor Shipment Module in lieu of DD Form 1659.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 252.247 RESERVED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 1998 for May Limited  Partnership 1984-1 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000757525
<NAME>                        May Limited Partnership 1984-1
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         146
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  71
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               217
<PP&E>                                         8,112
<DEPRECIATION>                                 8,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 229
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          8
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     221
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   229
<SALES>                                        307
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               316
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  79
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                237
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            237
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   237
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  27.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  27.18
        


</TABLE>
§ 763.22 Negligence and negligent servicing. ( a ) The Agency may deny a loss claim in whole or in part due to negligence that contributed to the loss claim. This could include, but is not limited to: ( 1 ) The escrow and servicing agent failing to seek payment of a missed installment from the buyer within the prescribed timeframe or otherwise does not enforce the terms of the land contract;
( 2 ) Losing the collateral to a third party, such as a taxing authority, prior lien holder, *etc;*
( 3 ) Not performing the duties and responsibilities required of the escrow or servicing agent;
( 4 ) The seller's failure to disclose environmental issues; or
( 5 ) Any other action in violation of the land contract or guarantee agreement that does not terminate the guarantee.
( b ) [Reserved]
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

CLARENCE WATERS, #132116, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO.2:06-CV-650-MEF

)

KENNETH L. JONES, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

ORDER

Upon review of the file in this case, and for good cause, it is

ORDERED that on or before March 31, 2008 the petitioner may file a response to

the supplemental answers filed by the respondents on March 7, 2008 (Court Doc. No. 32)

and March 21, 2008 (Court Doc. No. 38).

Done this 21st day of March, 2008.

 /s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00650-MEF-SRW Document 39 Filed 03/21/2008 Page 1 of 1
§ 58.524 Packaging and general identification. ( a ) *Containers.* Containers used for packaging cottage cheese shall be any commercially acceptable multiple use or single service container or packaging material which will satisfactorily protect the contents through the regular channels of trade without significant impairment of quality with respect to flavor, or contamination under normal conditions of handling. Caps or covers which extend over the lip of the container shall be used on all cups or tubs containing two pounds or less, to protect the product from contamination during subsequent handling.
( b ) *Packaging.* The cheese shall be packaged in a sanitary manner and automatic filling and capping equipment shall be used on all small sizes. The containers shall be checked weighed during the filling operation to assure they are filled uniformly to not less than the stated net weight on the container. Also care shall be taken that the cottage cheese be of uniform consistency at the time of packaging to assure legal composition in all packages.
( c ) *General identification.* Bulk packages containing cottage cheese shall be adequately and legibly marked with the name of the product, net weight, name and address of the manufacturer, lot number, code or date of packaging and any other identification as may be required. Consumer size packaged products shall meet the applicable regulations of the Food and Drug Administration.
Case 2:06-cv-00620-WKW-CSC Document 1-7 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 1 of 1