alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 3 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Monday, January 10, 2011.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Donna Powers at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7977.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Area 3 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Monday, January 10, 2011, at 2:30 p.m. Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Donna Powers. For more information, please contact Ms. Powers at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7977, or write TAP Office, 1000 South Pine Island Road, Suite 340, Plantation, FL 33324, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: December 3, 2010.

Shawn F. Collins

Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel. 

[FR Doc. 2010-30888 Filed 12-7-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Case 2:06-cv-00632-WKW-DRB Document 1-3 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00632-WKW-DRB Document 1-3 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 2 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00632-WKW-DRB Document 1-3 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 3 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00632-WKW-DRB Document 1-3 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 4 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00632-WKW-DRB Document 1-3 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 5 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00632-WKW-DRB Document 1-3 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 6 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00632-WKW-DRB Document 1-3 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 7 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00632-WKW-DRB Document 1-3 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 8 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00632-WKW-DRB Document 1-3 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 9 of 9
237.102-71 Limitation on service contracts for military flight simulators.       (a)  *Definitions*.  As used in this subsection—          (1)  “Military flight simulator” means any system to simulate the form, fit, and function of a military aircraft that has no commonly available commercial variant.          (2)  “Service contract” means any contract entered into by DoD, the principal purpose of which is to furnish services in the United States through the use of service employees as defined in 41 U.S.C. 6701.          (b)  Under Section 832 of Pub. L. 109-364, as amended by Section 883(b) of Pub. L. 110-181, DoD is prohibited from entering into a service contract to acquire a military flight simulator.  However, the Secretary of Defense may waive this prohibition with respect to a contract, if the Secretary—          (1)  Determines that a waiver is in the national interest; and          (2)  Provides an economic analysis to the congressional defense committees at least 30 days before the waiver takes effect.  This economic analysis shall include, at a minimum—          (i)  A clear explanation of the need for the contract; and          (ii)  An examination of at least two alternatives for fulfilling the requirements that the contract is meant to fulfill, including the following with respect to each alternative:          (A)  A rationale for including the alternative.          (B)  A cost estimate of the alternative and an analysis of the quality of each cost estimate.          (C)  A discussion of the benefits to be realized from the alternative.          (D)  A best value determination of each alternative and a detailed explanation of the life-cycle cost calculations used in the determination.          (c)  When reviewing requirements or participating in acquisition planning that would result in a military department or defense agency acquiring a military flight simulator, the contracting officer shall notify the program officials of the prohibition in paragraph (b) of this subsection.  If the program officials decide to request a waiver from the Secretary of Defense under paragraph (b) of this subsection, the contracting officer shall follow the procedures at PGI                 237.102-71             .    **Parent topic:** 237.102 Policy.
COURTROOM DEPUTY’S MINUTES MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/INITIAL APPEARANCE DATE: August 1, 2006

 BOND HEARING

 DETENTION HEARING Digital Recording 3:46 - 3:50

 PRELIMINARY (EXAMINATION)(HEARING)

 REMOVAL HEARING (R.40)

 ARRAIGNMENT

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PRESIDING MAG. JUDGE: Susan Russ Walker DEPUTY CLERK: Joyce Taylor

CASE NO. 2:06mj72-DRB DEFENDANT NAME: Joshua Wayne Hester

AUSA: David Cooke DEFT. ATTY: Stephen Glassroth

Type Counsel: (/ )Retained; ( ) CJA; ( ) Waived; () FPD

USPO/USPTS: Tamara Martin

Interpreter needed: ( / ) NO; ( )YES Name:

____________________________________________________________________________

/ Date of Arrest August 1, 2006 or  Arrest Rule 40

/ Deft First Appearance. Advised of rights/charges.  Prob/Sup Rel Violator

 Financial Affidavit executed. ORAL MOTION for appointment of Counsel.

 ORAL ORDER appointing Federal Public Defender - Notice of Appearance to be filed

 Panel Attorney Appointed;  to be appointed - prepare voucher

 Deft. Advises he will retain counsel. Has retained _____________________

/  Government’s ORAL Motion for Detention Hrg.  to be followed by written

motion; / Government’s WRITTEN Motion for Detention Hrg. filed

/ Detention Hearing/Preliminary Examination set for August 2, 2006 at 3:00 p.m.

 ORDER OF TEMPORARY DETENTION PENDING HEARING to be entered

 ORDER OF DETENTION HEARING PENDING TRIAL to be entered

 Release order entered. Deft advised of conditions of release

  BOND EXECUTED (M/D AL charges) $. Deft released

 BOND EXECUTED (R. 40) - deft to report to originating district as ordered

 Bond not executed. Defendant to remain in Marshal’s custody

 Deft. ORDERED REMOVED to originating district

 Waiver of  preliminary hearing;  Waiver Rule 40 hearing

 Court finds PROBABLE CAUSE. Defendant bound over to the Grand Jury

 ARRAIGNMENT HELD. Plea of NOT GUILTY entered. Set for

DISCOVERY DISCLOSURE DATE: 

 WAIVER of Speedy Trial CRIMINAL TERM: 

/ NOTICE to retained Criminal Defense Attorney handed to counsel

Case 2:06-mj-00072-DRB Document 4 Filed 08/01/2006 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Geopulse Exploration, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10KSB for the period ended January 31, 2008 (the Report), I, Tim Sun, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  April 30, 2008 /s/ Tim Sun, Chief Financial Officer
52.225-13 Restrictions on Certain Foreign

Purchases.

As prescribed in 25.1103 (a)(, insert the following clause:

Restrictions on certain foreign purchases (Feb 2021)

(a) Except as authorized by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) in the Department of the

Treasury, the Contractor shall not acquire, for use in the performance of this contract, any supplies

or services if any proclamation, Executive order, or statute administered by OFAC, or if OFAC’s

implementing regulations at 31 CFR ChapterV, would prohibit such a transaction by a person

subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.

(b) Except as authorized by OFAC, most transactions involving Cuba, Iran, and Sudan are prohibited,

as are most imports from Burma or North Korea, into the United States or its outlying areas. Lists of

entities and individuals subject to economic sanctions are included in OFAC’s List of Specially

Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons at

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/specially-designated-nationals-and-blocke

d-persons-list-sdn-human-readable-lists. More information about these restrictions, as well as

updates, is available in the OFAC’s regulations at 31 CFR ChapterV and/or on OFAC’s website at

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/office-of-foreign-assets-control-sanctions-programs-and-infor

mation.

(c) The Contractor shall insert this clause, including this paragraph (c), in all subcontracts.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.225 [Reserved]
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 1-6 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 1 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 1-6 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 2 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 1-6 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 3 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 1-6 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 4 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 1-6 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 5 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 1-6 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 6 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 1-6 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 7 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 1-6 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 8 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 1-6 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 9 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 1-6 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 10 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 1-6 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 11 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 1-6 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 12 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 1-6 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 13 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 1-6 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 14 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 1-6 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 15 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 1-6 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 16 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 1-6 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 17 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 1-6 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 18 of 18
25.604 Preaward determination concerning the inapplicability of section 1605 of the Recovery Act or the Buy American statute.       (a) For any acquisition, an offeror may request from the contracting officer a determination concerning the inapplicability of section 1605 of the Recovery Act or the Buy American statute for specifically identified construction materials. The time for submitting the request is specified in the solicitation in paragraph (b) of either 52.225-22 or 52.225-24, whichever applies. The information and supporting data that must be included in the request are also specified in the solicitation in paragraphs (c) and (d) of either 52.225-21 or 52.225-23, whichever applies.                                          (b) Before award, the contracting officer must evaluate all requests based on the information provided and may supplement this information with other readily available information.                                          (c) Determination based on unreasonable cost of domestic construction material.                                                         (1)                         *Manufactured construction material*. The contracting officer must compare the offered price of the contract using foreign manufactured construction material (*i.e.*, any construction material not manufactured in the United States, or construction material consisting predominantly of iron or steel and the iron or steel is not produced in the United States) to the estimated price if all domestic manufactured construction material were used. If use of domestic manufactured construction material would increase the overall offered price of the contract by more than 25 percent, then the contracting officer shall determine that the cost of the domestic manufactured construction material is unreasonable                                                            (2)                         *Unmanufactured construction material*. The contracting officer must compare the cost of each foreign unmanufactured construction material to the cost of domestic unmanufactured construction material. If the cost of the domestic unmanufactured construction material exceeds the cost of the foreign unmanufactured construction material by more than 20 percent, then the contracting officer shall determine that the cost of the domestic unmanufactured construction material is unreasonable.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 25.6 - American Recovery and Reinvestment Act-Buy American statute-Construction Materials
# 43.106 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**Subpart 43.1 - General
5637.590-90 Contractor Manpower Reporting

(Revised June 2021)

Title 10, U.S.C., Sections 235 and 2330a establish the requirement to report on manpower functions

and costs under services contracts. Contractors were previously required to report on manpower to

eCMRA; however, beginning with the FY20 reporting period (FY21 Q1) reporting will be done in

SAM . FAR 4.1705 provides specifics on the data to be reported and applicable clauses.

HQ, United States Special Operations Command

Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L)

SOFARS 5637

February 2007

Parent topic: 5637.503 AgencyHead Responsibilities
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

DENVER IVAN WILSON

,

Appellant

,

v. Case No. 5D 22

- 2872

LT Case No. 1999

- CF

- 907

- A

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

.

________________________________/

Decision filed May 30, 2023

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Seminole County

, Donna L. Mc I ntosh , Judge.

Denver I van Wilson, Lake Butler, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and Allison L. Morris,

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona

Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

JAY, EISNAUGLE and BOATWRIGHT , JJ., concur.
234.001 Definition.       As used in this subpart—          “Acceptable earned value management system” and “earned value management system” are defined in the clause at                 252.234-7002             , Earned Value Management System.          “Production of major defense acquisition program” means the production and deployment of a major system that is intended to achieve an operational capability that satisfies mission needs, or an activity otherwise defined as Milestone C under Department of Defense Instruction 5000.02 or related authorities.          “Significant deficiency” is defined in the clause at                 252.234-7002             , Earned Value Management System, and is synonymous with “noncompliance.”    **Parent topic:** Part 234 - MAJOR SYSTEM ACQUISITION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

M IDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABA M A

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

August 24, 2006

NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE

To: ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD

Case Style: Bowden v. Mission Petroleum Carriers et al 

Case Number: 2:06-cv-00665-WHA

Referenced Pleading: RESPONSE to Discovery

Docket Entry Number: 9

The referenced pleading was electronically filed on ***August 23, 2006*** in this case and is

not in compliance with the local rules and/or administrative procedures of this court. 

******This pleading is discovery and is not allowed pursuant to Local Rule 5.1 NON-FILING

OF CIVIL DISCOVERY.

The pleading is hereby STRICKEN from the record and the parties are instructed to disregard

the entry of this pleading on the court’s docket. Parties should be aware that the striking of

this entry does not affect their responsibilities as to the discovery process.

Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 10 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

WILLIAM D. BOWDEN, ) 

 )

Plaintiff, )

 )

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06CV665-WHA

 )

MISSION PETROLEUM CARRIERS, )

ANTONIO MARTINEZ NAVARRO, )

 )

Defendants. )

ORDER ON MOTION

On April 11, 2007, the plaintiff filed a Motion for Contempt and/or Motion to Compel

Production and Compliance with Subpoena to a Non-Party (Doc. #33). The court entered an order

requesting the defendants and the non-party to response to the motion. Accordingly, on April 16,

2007, the plaintiff’s filed a Motion to Withdraw Motion for Contempt and/or Motion to Compel

Production and Compliance with Subpoena to a Non-party (Doc. #38). Therefore, it is 

ORDERED that the motion (Doc. #38) is GRANTED. Counsel indicated in their response

that the non-party informed his office of the availability of the requested documents. This court

reminds the attorneys of record in this case of the requirement that litigants seek to resolve discovery

disputes by a good faith conference before seeking court intervention. 

DONE this 17th day of April, 2007.

/s/ Wallace Capel, Jr.

WALLACE CAPEL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 40 Filed 04/17/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### § 635.1 Definitions and abbreviations.

The following terms apply to this part:

*Appeal rights* means the right of the participant to appeal a decision to the National Appeals Division (NAD) pursuant to part 614 of this chapter.

*Chief* means the Chief of the Natural Resources Conservation Service or a person with delegated authority to act for the Chief.

*Covered program* means a conservation program administered by NRCS.

*Equitable relief* means an action described in § 635.5 of this part.

*Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)* means an agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture which has responsibility for administering covered programs, including those using the funds, facilities, and authorities of the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC).

*OGC* means the Office of the General Counsel of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

*Participant* means a participant in a covered program.

*Secretary* means the Secretary of U.S. Department of Agriculture.

*State* means each of the several States of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and any other territory or possession of the United States.

*State Conservationist* means the NRCS employee authorized to direct and supervise NRCS activities in a State or the State Conservationist's designee.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 76056]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30915]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OVERSEAS PRIVATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Notice

Cancellation of December 9, 2010 Board Meeting

    OPIC's Sunshine Act notice of its Board meeting was published in 
the Federal Register (Volume 75, Number 210, Page 67145) on November 1, 
2010. There being no business to bring before the Board, the meeting 
has been cancelled.

CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION:  Information on the hearing 
cancellation may be obtained from Connie M. Downs at (202) 336-8438, 
via facsimile at (202) 218-0136, or via e-mail at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#35765a5b5b5c501b715a425b46755a455c561b525a43"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="eba8848585828ec5af849c8598ab849b8288c58c849d">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: December 3, 2010.
Connie M. Downs,
OPIC Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-30915 Filed 12-3-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3210-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
## Court of Appeals of the State of Geo rgia

ATLA NTA,

_________________ _ The Court of

Appeals hereby passes

the followi

ng order: A14D0434. EDDIE LEE JINKS v. T HE STATE. Eddie Jink s seek s to ap peal t he tri al cou rt’s order denying his motion for an out of tim e appeal. An order denying amotion

for an out of tim e appeal, however , is a directly appealabl e order. See, e.g., Lunsford v. State , 237 Ga. App. 696 ( 515 SE2d 198) (1999). When a party applies for discretionary review of a directly appealab le order , we grant theapplicati on under OCGA § 5-6-35 (j ). Acc ordingly , this appl ication is hereby GRANTED. J i nks shall have 10 days from the date of this order to file a notice of appeal

with thetrial court. The trial court is instruct ed to include

a copy of this order in the appe llate re cord.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Offi

ce, Atlant a,_______________

___ I certify t hat the abo ve is a true

extrac t from the minutes of the Court

of Appeals

of Georgia. Witness my signature a nd t he s eal of sai

d court hereto aff

ixed the day and year last above writt

en. , Clerk. 07/23/2014 July 23, 2014
|T H E   W H I T E   H O U S E

Bulletin No. 99-07, Supplement  5

Help

Text Only | T H E   W H I T E   H O U S E     | Bulletin No. 99-07, Supplement  5 | Help

Text Only
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------- | --------------------------------- | ---------------
|T H E   W H I T E   H O U S E                                                     | Bulletin No. 99-07, Supplement  5 | Help

Text Only                  

|
|

|BULLETIN NO. 99-07, Supplement No. 5

TO THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND ESTABLISHMENTS

SUBJECT:  Apportionment Under the Extension of the Continuing Resolution for Fiscal
Year 2000

1.  **Purpose and background**.  H. J. Res. 80 extends the continuing
resolution through November 18, 1999.

2.  **Apportionment**.  I am extending the automatic apportionment
specified in section 2 of OMB Bulletin No. 99-07 to November 18, 1999.  The portion of the year covered is now 13.4
percent.

If you can justify amounts greater than the amount automatically apportioned, please submit
a written request for apportionment.

Jacob J. LewDirector



The Budget
 | 
Legislative Information
 | 
Management Reform/GPRA
 | 
Grants Management
Financial Management
 | 
Procurement
        Policy
 | 
Information &
        Regulatory Policy

Privacy Statement
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------