alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2988 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on railway car body shells 

for electric multiple unit commuter coaches of stainless steel. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 23, 2006 

Mr. ALLEN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on railway car 

body shells for electric multiple unit commuter coaches 

of stainless steel. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RAILWAY CAR BODY SHELLS FOR EMU COM4 MUTER COACHES OF STAINLESS STEEL. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.86.09 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 railway car body shells for electric multiple unit (EMU) 

8 commuter coaches of stainless steel) is amended by strik9 ing ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 2988 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
5213.305-3 Conditions for use.

(d)(ii) Requests for approval to use imprest funds shall be submitted to Director for Financial

Commerce, Office of the Deputy Chief Financial Officer, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense

(Comptroller) via DASN(P) by email at usn.pentagon.asstsecnavrdadc.mbx.pabt@us.navy.mil with

the subject “[Activity Name]

DFARS 213.305-3 – Imprest Fund Approval Request.”

Parent topic: 5213.305 Imprest funds and third party drafts.
# Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation

- Part 227 - PATENTS, DATA, AND COPYRIGHTS 
- Part 228 - BONDS AND INSURANCE 
- Part 229 - TAXES 
- Part 230 - COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS 
- Part 231 - CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES 
- Part 232 - CONTRACT FINANCING 
- Part 233 - PROTESTS, DISPUTES, AND APPEALS 

**Parent topic:**Subchapter E - GENERAL CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS
Exhibit 32.2

Obagi Medical Products, Inc.    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Obagi Medical Products, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen Garcia, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|Date: March 4, 2008 |  |                                                                                            
|------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  | /s/STEPHEN A. GARCIAStephen A. Garcia Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)

---



QuickLinks
#### § 927.24 Eligibility for membership.

Each grower member and each of his or her alternates shall be a grower, or an officer or employee of a corporate or LLC grower, who grows pears in the district in which and for which he or she is nominated and selected. Each handler member and each of his or her alternates shall be a handler, or an officer or employee of a handler, handling pears in the district in and for which he or she is nominated and selected. Each processor member and each of their alternates shall be a processor, or an officer or employee of a processor, who processes pears in the production area.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.99








THE PROGRESSIVE CORPORATION
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION 


	
		
	 
	2017-2018 Compensation

	Chairman of the Board
	$470,000

	Lead Independent Director
	$50,000 additional

	Audit Committee Chair
	$295,000

	Audit Committee Member
	$270,000

	Compensation Committee Chair
	$285,000

	Compensation Committee Member
	$260,000

	Investment Committee Chair
	$285,000

	Investment Committee Member
	$260,000

	Additional Committee Chair*
	$20,000 additional

	Additional Committee Member*
	$15,000 additional






*Excludes Executive Committee
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3140 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3140

      To suspend temporarily the duty on cerium sulfide pigments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

 Mr. Chambliss introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To suspend temporarily the duty on cerium sulfide pigments.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERIUM SULFIDE PIGMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.32.11        Cerium sulfide          Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           pigments (CAS No.                                                 31/2009          ''
                           12014-93-6 and CAS                                                                  .
                           No. 12031-49-1)
                           (provided for in
                           subheading
                           3206.49.50)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

M IDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABA M A

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT

To: All Counsel of Record

 

Re: Harold Kelly Murphy v. Southern Energy Homes, Inc.

Civil Action No. 2:06-cv-00618-SRW

The above-styled case has been reassigned to Judge Mark E. Fuller.

Please note that the case number is now 2:06cv00618-MEF. This new case number should be used

on all future correspondence and pleadings in this action.

 

Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 6 Filed 07/21/2006 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

WILLIAM D. BOWDEN, ) 

 )

Plaintiff, )

 )

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06CV665-WHA

 )

MISSION PETROLEUM CARRIERS, )

ANTONIO MARTINEZ NAVARRO, )

 )

Defendants. )

AMENDED ORDER

Upon consideration of the Motion for Contempt and/or Motion to Compel Production and

Compliance with Subpoena to a Non-Party, filed on April 11, 2007, and for good cause, it is

ORDERED that the defendants shall show cause in writing on or before April 26, 2007 as

to why the motion should not be granted. The Clerk is directed to forward a copy of this court’s

order to the non-party, Southeast Pallet & Box Co, P.O. Box 1882, Montgomery, Alabama 36108.

DONE this 16th day of April, 2007.

/s/ Wallace Capel, Jr.

WALLACE CAPEL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00665-WHA-WC Document 37 Filed 04/16/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### Howard Grain Corp., Formerly Known as Bell Sixty Corp., Respondent, v. Donald V. Howard, Appellant.

Motion to dismiss appeal from order denying motion to change the place of trial from New York County denied; cross motion, to the extent it seeks an order transferring appeal to the Appellate Division, First Judicial Department, granted, without costs. The appeal was erroneously taken to this court (CPLR 5711). Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur.
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 24 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 24 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 24 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 3 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 24 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 4 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 24 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 5 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 24-2 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 1 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 24-2 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 2 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 24-2 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 3 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 24-2 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 4 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 24-2 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 5 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 24-2 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 6 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 24-2 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 7 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 24-2 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 8 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 24-2 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 9 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 24-2 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 10 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 24-2 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 11 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 24-2 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 12 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 24-2 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 13 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 24-2 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 14 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 24-2 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 15 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 24-3 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 24-3 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 2 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 24-3 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 3 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 24-3 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 4 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 24-3 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 5 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 24-3 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 6 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 24-3 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 7 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 24-3 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 8 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 24-3 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 9 of 9
52.215-14 Integrity of Unit Prices.

As prescribed in 15.408(f)(1), insert the following clause:

Integrity of Unit Prices (Nov 2021)

(a) Any proposal submitted for the negotiation of prices for items of supplies shall distribute costs

within contracts on a basis that ensures that unit prices are in proportion to the items’ base cost

(e.g., manufacturing or acquisition costs). Any method of distributing costs to line items that distorts

unit prices shall not be used. For example, distributing costs equally among line items is not

acceptable except when there is little or no variation in base cost. Nothing in this paragraph

requires submission of certified cost or pricing data not otherwise required by law or regulation.

(b) When requested by the Contracting Officer, the Offeror/Contractor shall also identify those

supplies that it will not manufacture or to which it will not contribute significant value.

(c) The Contractor shall insert the substance of this clause, less paragraph (b) of this clause, in all

subcontracts for other than: acquisitions at or below the simplified acquisition threshold, as defined

in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 2.101 on the date of subcontract award; construction or

architect-engineer services under FAR part 36; utility services under FAR part 41; services where

supplies are not required; commercial products and commercial services; and petroleum products.

(End of clause)

Alternate I (Oct 1997). As prescribed in 15.408 (f)(2), substitute the following paragraph (b) for

paragraph (b) of the basic clause:

(b) The Offeror/Contractor shall also identify those supplies that it will not manufacture or to which

it will not contribute significant value.

Parent topic: 52.215 [Reserved]
§ 58.8 How to make application. ( a ) *On a fee basis.* An application for inspection or grading service may be made in any inspection or grading office or with any inspector or grader. Such application may be made orally (in person or by telephone), in writing, or by telegraph. If made orally, written confirmation may be required.
( b ) *On a continuous basis.* Application for inspection or grading service on a continuous basis as provided in § 58.45 shall be made in writing on application forms as approved by the Administrator and filed with the Administrator.
#### § 52.11 When application may be withdrawn.

An application for inspection service may be withdrawn by the applicant at any time before the inspection is performed: *Provided,* That, the applicant shall pay at the hourly rate prescribed in § 52.42 for the time incurred by the inspector in connection with such application, any travel expenses, telephone, telegraph or other expenses which have been incurred by the inspection service in connection with such application.

[22 FR 3535, May 22, 1957, as amended at 38 FR 25166, Sept. 12, 1973. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977 and further redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981]
Subpart 5137.1 - Service Contracts - General

Parent topic: Part 5137 - Service Contracting

5137.102-90 Policy.

Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 5000.74, Defense Acquisition Services, dated 5 January

2016, is the primary authority for service acquisitions.

5137.104 Personal services contracts.

(b)(i) The head of the contracting activity (HCA) will make the determination as required by DFARS

237.104(b)(i) to authorize contracts pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 129b and 5 U.S.C. 3109. See Appendix GG

for further delegation. When a blanket determination and findings (D&F) applies, the contracting

officer will include in the contract file a copy of the blanket D&F and a statement signed by the

contracting officer clearly showing why the blanket D&F is applicable to the proposed contract.

(ii)(C)(2) The HCA for the U.S. Army Medical Command must approve requirements for services at

DFARS 237.104(b)(ii)(C)(2). See Appendix GG for further delegation.

(iii)(A)(2) The HCA will make the determination as required by DFARS 237.104(b)(iii) to authorize

contracts pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 129b(d). See Appendix GG for further delegation.

(S-90) Contracting officers will ensure that purchase requests for personal services in the areas

listed in DA Pamphlet 25-91 (Visual Information Procedures) have been approved by the local

multimedia/visual information activity. See Army Regulation 25-1.

5137.112 Government use of private sector temporaries.

Direct questions about acquisition of these services to the civilian personnel office.

5137.113-1 Waiver of cost allowability limitations.

(a) The Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology) has authority to

make the determination at FAR 37.113-1. See Appendix GG for further delegation.

5137.170 Approval of contracts and task orders for services.

5137.170-2 Approval requirements.

(a) Acquisition of services through a contract or task order that is not performance based.
(1) The HCA has authority to approve actions for the dollar threshold identified at DFARS

237.170-2(a)(1). See Appendix GG for further delegation.

(2) The senior procurement executive has authority to approve actions for the dollar threshold

identified at DFARS 237.170-2(a)(2). See Appendix GG for further delegation.
2008 PM2.5 Plan 

This appendix was submitted by the eight Regional Metropolitan Planning 

Organizations of the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin

Appendix C 

 

Conformity Budgets Documentation 
2008 PM2.5 Plan 

This page intentionally blank. 
San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District 

Appendix C: Conformity B

Appendix C-1 

Appendix C: Conformity Budgets Documentation

San Joaquin Valley MVEB Estimates 

(tons per annual day) 

CAC UTD (where available) 

* Budget is established by rounding emissions total to the next highest tenth. 

2009 Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets 

County Fresno Kern Kings Madera Merced San Joaqu

 PM2.5 NOx PM2.5 NOx PM2.5 NOx PM2.5 NOx PM2.5 NOx PM2.5 NOBaseline EMFAC2007 2.15 60.78 3.42 95.67 0.69 19.38 0.57 15.10 1.42 36.50 1.51 41.Adopted State and Local Measures not included in EMFAC 2007 0.02 4.35 0.03 8.07 0.01 1.57 0.01 1.08 0.01 2.92 0.01 2.ARB 2007 State Strategy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.Total 2.13 56.43 3.39 87.60 0.68 17.81 0.56 14.02 1.41 33.58 1.50 39.Budget* 2.2 56.5 3.4 87.7 0.7 17.9 0.6 14.1 1.5 33.6 1.6 39
San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District 

Appendix C: Conformity B

Appendix C-2 

2012 Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets

County Fresno Kern Kings Madera Merced San Joaqu

 PM2.5 NOx PM2.5 NOx PM2.5 NOx PM2.5 NOx PM2.5 NOx PM2.5 NOBaseline EMFAC2007 1.82 47.82 2.98 81.58 0.59 16.00 0.50 12.30 1.19 29.15 1.39 35.Adopted State and Local Measures not included in EMFAC 2007 0.02 3.64 0.03 7.44 0.01 1.41 0.01 0.95 0.01 2.52 0.01 2.ARB 2007 State Strategy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.Total 1.80 44.18 2.95 74.14 0.58 14.59 0.49 11.35 1.18 26.63 1.38 32.Budget* 1.9 44.2 3.0 74.2 0.6 14.6 0.5 11.4 1.2 26.7 1.4 322014 Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets

County Fresno Kern Kings Madera Merced San Joaqu

 PM2.5 NOx PM2.5 NOx PM2.5 NOx PM2.5 NOx PM2.5 NOx PM2.5 NOBaseline EMFAC2007 1.65 40.60 2.63 70.28 0.46 13.52 0.46 10.62 1.05 24.67 1.29 30.Adopted State and Local Measures not included in EMFAC 2007 0.02 3.35 0.03 6.95 0.01 1.29 0.01 0.90 0.02 2.32 0.01 2.ARB 2007 State Strategy 0.61 11.31 1.27 21.76 0.24 4.23 0.17 3.04 0.46 7.61 0.43 7.Total 1.02 25.94 1.33 41.57 0.21 8.00 0.28 6.68 0.57 14.74 0.86 20.Budget* 1.1 26.0 1.4 41.6 0.3 8.1 0.3 6.7 0.6 14.8 0.9 20
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 16 Filed 02/14/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00666-WHA-TFM Document 16 Filed 02/14/2007 Page 2 of 2
52.227-18 Rights in Data-Existing Works.

As prescribed in 27.409(f), insert the following clause:

Rights in Data-Existing Works (Dec 2007)

(a) Except as otherwise provided in this contract, the Contractor grants to the Government, and

others acting on its behalf, a paid-up nonexclusive, irrevocable, worldwide license to reproduce,

prepare derivative works, and perform publicly and display publicly, by or on behalf of the

Government, for all the material or subject matter called for under this contract, or for which this

clause is specifically made applicable.

(b) The Contractor shall indemnify the Government and its officers, agents, and employees acting for

the Government against any liability, including costs and expenses, incurred as the result of (1) the

violation of trade secrets, copyrights, or right of privacy or publicity, arising out of the creation,

delivery, publication or use of any data furnished under this contract; or (2) any libelous or other

unlawful matter contained in such data. The provisions of this paragraph do not apply unless the

Government provides notice to the Contractor as soon as practicable of any claim or suit, affords the

Contractor an opportunity under applicable laws, rules, or regulations to participate in the defense

of the claim or suit, and obtains the Contractor’s consent to the settlement of any claim or suit other

than as required by final decree of a court of competent jurisdiction; and do not apply to material

furnished to the Contractor by the Government and incorporated in data to which this clause

applies.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.227 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INCOME
STATEMENT BALANCE SHEET IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000758604
<NAME> BUSH INDUSTRIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-05-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-04-1998
<CASH>                                           3,096
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,103
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,653
<INVENTORY>                                     53,745
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               108,603
<PP&E>                                         255,565
<DEPRECIATION>                                  91,089
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 300,888
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           53,477
<BONDS>                                        107,670
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,394
<OTHER-SE>                                     121,412
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   300,888
<SALES>                                         97,089
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                97,089
<CGS>                                           70,365
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   70,365
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,574
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   132
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,253
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,765
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,872
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,893
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,893
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .26
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman,
Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahr a Bridget M. McCormac k

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstei n Kurtis T. Wilde r Elizabeth T. Clement,
J ustices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at t he direction of the Court.

May 25, 2018

a0516 

# Order

Clerk May 25, 2018

150672

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 15 0672 COA: 314060 Wayne CC: 04-000496-FC SAMIR HADOUS, Defendant-Appellant.

___________________ __________________/

By order of December 18, 2015, th e application for leave to ap peal the October 28, 2014 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in People v Temelkoski (Docket No. 150643). On order of the Court, the case having be en decided on January 24, 2018, 501 Mich ___ (2018), the applicati on is again considered and, it appearing to this Court that the cases of People v Tucker (Docket No. 152798) and People v Snyder (Docket No. 153696) are pending on appeal before this Court and that the decisions in those cases may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYA NCE pending the
decisions in those cases.
# 5146.702 General.

(c)  See Army Regulation 700-139 for procedures on tracking and accumulating data on warranty costs.

**Parent topic:**Subpart 5146.7 - Warranties
Case 3:06-cv-00645-MEF-TFM Document 15 Filed 02/05/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 3:06-cv-00645-MEF-TFM Document 15 Filed 02/05/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 3:06-cv-00645-MEF-TFM Document 15 Filed 02/05/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 3:06-cv-00645-MEF-TFM Document 15 Filed 02/05/2007 Page 4 of 4
208.7403 Acquisition procedures.    (S-90) In accordance with DFARS PGI 208.7403(5)(iii), the designated management official is the DISA CIO.       (S-91) If requiring officials determine that the JELA supports a requirement, but there is an unusual or compelling circumstance to use another source, the waiver must be completed and submitted with the acquisition package. The waiver is located at https://www.ditco.disa.mil/contracts/SampleDocTemplates.asp. **Parent topic:** SUBPART 208.74 – ENTERPRISE SOFTWARE AGREEMENTS