alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Subpart 251.1 - CONTRACTOR USE OF GOVERNMENT SUPPLY SOURCES    **Parent topic:** Part 251 - USE OF GOVERNMENT SOURCES BY CONTRACTORS251.101 Policy.       (a)(1) Notwithstanding the restriction at FAR 51.101(a)(1), contracting officers may authorize contractors to use Defense Logistics Agency Energy as a source of fuel in performance of other than cost-reimbursement contracts, when the fuel is funded by the Defense Working Capital Fund. When providing this authorization to contractors, follow the procedures at PGI PGI 251.101 Policy..251.102 Authorization to use Government supply sources.       (e)  When authorizing contractor use of Government supply sources, follow the procedures at PGI                 251.102             .          (3)(ii)  The contracting officer may also authorize the contractor to use the DD Form 1155 when requisitioning from the Department of Veterans Affairs.          (f)  The authorizing agency is also responsible for promptly considering requests of the DoD supply source for authority to refuse to honor requisitions from a contractor that is indebted to DoD and has failed to pay proper invoices in a timely manner.251.107 Contract clause.       Use the clause at                 252.251-7000             , Ordering From Government Supply Sources, in solicitations and contracts which include the clause at FAR 52.251-1, Government Supply Sources.          See DoD Class Deviation 2013-O0012, Authorization for Contractors to Use Government Supply Sources in Support of Operation Enduring Freedom, issued on April 24, 2013. This deviation encourages contracting officers to authorize contractors (including contractors with fixed-price contracts) to use appropriate Government supply sources, including DLA (for construction materials) and GSA Central Asia and South Caucasus Supply Catalog under the GSA Global Supply Program, in performance of contracts in support of Operation Enduring Freedom. This constitutes a deviation from the policy at FAR 51.101. This class deviation remains in effect until incorporated in the DFARS or otherwise rescinded.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2872 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Endosulfan. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 19, 2006 

Mr. BURR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Endosulfan. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ENDOSULFAN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.11.14 6,7,8,9,10,10- 

Hexachlorohexahydromethano-2,4,3-benzodioxathiepin3-oxide (Endosulfan) (CAS 

No. 115–29–7) (provided for 

in subheading 2920.90.50 or 

3808.10.50) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•S 2872 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JACOB MARTIN CASSELL, JR.,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 116 MM 2020

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 14th day of August , 2020

, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for

Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is GRANTED. Counsel is DIRECTED to file the

already prepared Petition for Allowance of Appeal within 5 days.
161 So.2d 279

#### Mrs. Florence K. CRAFT and Raiford Ballard et ux. v. NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA et al.

No. 47152.

March 11, 1964.

Court of Appeal, Third Circuit.

159 So.2d 763, 770.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
252.237-7024 Notice of Continuation of Essential Contractor Services.       As prescribed in 237.7603(b), use the following provision:          NOTICE OF CONTINUATION OF ESSENTIAL CONTRACTOR SERVICES (OCT 2010)          (a) *Definitions.*“Essential contractor service”** and “mission-essential functions” have the meanings given in the clause at                 252.237-7023             , Continuation of Essential Contractor Services, in this solicitation.          (b) The offeror shall provide with its offer a written plan describing how it will continue to perform the essential contractor services listed in attachment ___, Mission Essential Contractor Services, dated ________, during periods of crisis. The offeror shall–          (1) Identify provisions made for the acquisition of essential personnel and resources, if necessary, for continuity of operations for up to 30 days or until normal operations can be resumed;          (2) Address in the plan, at a minimum—          (i) Challenges associated with maintaining essential contractor services during an extended event, such as a pandemic that occurs in repeated waves;          (ii) The time lapse associated with the initiation of the acquisition of essential personnel and resources and their actual availability on site;          (iii) The components, processes, and requirements for the identification, training, and preparedness of personnel who are capable of relocating to alternate facilities or performing work from home;          (iv) Any established alert and notification procedures for mobilizing identified “essential contractor service” personnel; and          (v) The approach for communicating expectations to contractor employees regarding their roles and responsibilities during a crisis.          (End of provision)    **Parent topic:** 252.237 RESERVED
52.237-9 Waiver of Limitation on Severance

Payments to Foreign Nationals.

As prescribed in 37.113-2(b), use the following clause:

Waiver of Limitation on Severance Payments to Foreign Nationals (Dec 2022)

(a) Pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 3744(b) or 41 U.S.C. 4304(b)(1), as applicable, the cost allowability

limitations in FAR 31.205-6(g)(6) are waived.

(b) This clause may be incorporated into subcontracts issued under this contract, if approved by the

Contracting Officer.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.237 [Reserved]
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 1:98-cr-00030-MP

NORMAN JOHNSON,

Defendant.

___________________________/

O R D E R 

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 71, Motion for Release of Real Property as

Security for Bail Bond by Norman Johnson. Previously, the Defendant was allowed to remain

free on bond awaiting sentencing pursuant to certain conditions, which included securing the bail

bond with real property (Doc. 17). Defendant subsequently pled guilty in this cause and was

sentenced on November 4, 1998, to 120 months in the custody of the Attorney General. At the

time of sentencing, Defendant was immediately remanded to the custody of the Attorney General

to commence his sentence. Defendant therefore requests this Honorable Court to enter an order

directing the Clerk of the Court for the Northern District of Florida to execute a satisfaction of

mortgage (attached as Exhibit “A” to doc. 71) and to return the original documents submitted

pertaining to the bail bond.

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

The Clerk of the Court is directed to execute a satisfaction of mortgage regarding the

mortgage recorded at Book 18251, Page 2242 of the Official Records of Dade County,

Florida.

DONE AND ORDERED this 8th day of February, 2006

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:98-cr-00030-MP Document 72 Filed 02/08/06 Page 1 of 1
#### A. PARDI TILE CO. v. GOLDSTEIN et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 26, 1914.)

Action by A. Pardi Tile Company against Abraham J. Goldstein and others.

J. J. Cunningham, of New York City, for appellants.

J. S. Galland, of New York City, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Order filed.
Summary of Compensation Arrangements with Directors




 Exhibit 10.45 
 TIDEWATER INC. 
 SUMMARY OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS 
 For service as a non-management director, compensation is as follows: 
  

	 	•	 	 An annual cash retainer of $40,000; 


  

	 	•	 	 An additional annual cash retainer of $20,000 for the lead director; 


  

	 	•	 	 An additional annual cash retainer of $15,000 for the chair of each of the audit committee and the compensation committee, and $10,000 for the chair of each of the nominating
and corporate governance committee and the finance and investment committee; 


  

	 	•	 	 A meeting fee of $2,000 for each board or committee meeting attended; 


  

	 	•	 	 An annual grant of deferred stock units under the Directors Deferred Stock Units Plan valued at date of grant at $100,000; 


  

	 	•	 	 Reimbursement of reasonable travel and other out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attendance at meetings of the board of directors and its committees;



  

	 	•	 	 Participation in the company’s Gift Matching Program under which the company matches a director’s contribution to an educational institution or foundation up to
$5,000 per year; and 


  

	 	•	 	 For directors who were members of the board prior to March 31, 2006, accrued benefits under the now frozen Non-Qualified Pension Plan for Outside Directors of Tidewater.



  

 1
§ 612.2 Snow survey and water supply forecast activities. To carry out the cooperative snow survey and water supply forecast program, NRCS: ( a ) Establishes, maintains, and operates manual and automated snow course and related hydro meteorological networks. Planning for such networks is carried out in accordance with OMB Circular A-62.
( b ) Determines and provides information on the expected water supply, including seasonal streamflow data. If pertinent and appropriate to the needs of cooperators and not otherwise available to them, may provide necessary interpretative analyses and forecasts required for operation of water-control structures and/or agricultural operations.
( c ) On request and to the extent NRCS resources and any required cooperator contributions are available, establishes hydrometeorological stations to cllect and provide data and necessary interpretive analyses to the requesting party. By written agreement NRCS may accept cooperators' funds, materials, equipment, and services for this purpose.
( d ) Develops and encourages use of new techniques and improving data collection and processing.
( e ) Cooperates with other federal, state, and local agencies, organizations, and Canadian provinces and agencies.
§ 66.110 Small food manufacturers. A small food manufacturer must make the required bioengineered food disclosure using one of the bioengineered food disclosure options permitted under §§ 66.102, 66.104, 66.106, and 66.108 or as described in this section. ( a ) The label bears the statement: “Call for more food information,” which accompanies a telephone number that will provide the bioengineered food disclosure to the consumer, regardless of the time of day. Disclosure via telephone number must include a bioengineered food disclosure that is consistent with § 66.102 in audio form and may be pre-recorded.
( b ) The label bears the statement: “Visit [URL of the website] for more food information,” which accompanies a website that meets the requirements of § 66.106(b). Disclosure via website must include a bioengineered food disclosure that is consistent with § 66.102 or § 66.104 in written form.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.29
Compensation of Non-Employee Directors
Directors who are not officers of SEACOR Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) receive an annual retainer of $52,000 and $2,000 for every regular and special Board and Committee meeting they attend via telephone and $4,000 for every regular and special Board and Committee meeting they attend in person.
Each member of the Board who is not an employee of the Company is also granted options and Common Stock pursuant to the SEACOR Holding Inc.'s 2014 Share Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10.28 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K).
#### § 7.2 General.

State and county committees will, as directed by the Secretary, or a designee of the Secretary, carry out the programs and functions of the Secretary.
Subpart 5106.2 - Full and Open Competition

After Exclusion of Sources

Parent topic: Part 5106 - Competition Requirements

5106.202 Establishing or maintaining alternative sources.

(a) The Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology) may make the

determination as stated in FAR 6.202(a). See Appendix GG for further delegation, based on the

dollar value of the contract action.
§ 767.103 Managing leased real estate inventory property. ( a ) The Agency will pay for repairs to leased real estate inventory property only when necessary to protect the Agency's interest.
( b ) If the lessee purchases the real estate inventory property, the Agency will not credit lease payments to the purchase price of the property.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Casino Players, Inc., a Nevada
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, William G. Forhan, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Dated: March 19, 2010

By:  /s/ William G. Forhan
William G. Forhan
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, President and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
(Principal Financial/Accounting Officer)

<page>
Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 305

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION III

No. CR-13-948

WALLACE E. HUDSON, JR.

APPELLANT

V.

STATE OF ARKANSAS

APPELLEE

Opinion Delivered MAY 14, 2014

APPEAL FROM THE WHITE

COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

[NO. CR-13-115]

HONORABLE ROBERT EDWARDS,

JUDGE

AFFIRMED

DAVID M. GLOVER, Judge

On May 4, 2012, appellant Wallace Hudson was stopped, arrested, and charged with

failure to maintain liability insurance (later amended to failure to provide proof of insurance),

driving left of center, and driving while intoxicated. Hudson was found guilty in district

court of all three offenses. He appealed to circuit court, where he was again convicted of all

three offenses in a bench trial. On appeal, Hudson argues that there was insufficient evidence

to support the circuit court’s finding that he was intoxicated based his admission that he had

taken his prescription medication (oxycodone) thirty minutes prior to being stopped. 

However, this issue is not preserved for appellate review.

In a bench trial, a motion for dismissal shall be made at the close of all evidence and

shall state the specific grounds for dismissal. Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 33.1(b)

(2013). A defendant’s failure to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence at the time and in
Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 305

the manner specified in Rule 33.1(b) constitutes a waiver of any question pertaining to the

sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment. Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure

33.1(c). Rule 33.1 is strictly construed. McClina v. State, 354 Ark. 384, 123 S.W.3d 883

(2003).

Here, though Hudson’s counsel and the prosecuting attorney both made closing

arguments to the circuit court, Hudson’s counsel never moved for a dismissal of the charges. 

Our supreme court has held that a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence made during

a closing argument, instead of at the close of the evidence, does not preserve a sufficiency

argument for appellate review. Id. Because there was no motion to dismiss, Hudson has

waived any argument pertaining to the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction

for driving while intoxicated.

Affirmed.

GLADWIN, C.J., and HIXSON, J., agree.

Lightle, Raney, Streit & Streit, LLP, by: Jonathan R. Streit, for appellant.

Dustin McDaniel, Att’y Gen., by: Brad Newman, Ass’t Att’y Gen., and Richmond Giles,

Law Student Admitted to Practice Pursuant to Rule XV of the Rules Governing Admission

to the Bar of the Arkansas Supreme Court under the supervision of Darnisa Evans Johnson,

Deputy Att’y Gen., for appellee.

2
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 27 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 27 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Anthony R. Foglia, Deceased. Olga E. Foglia, as Administratrix of the Estate of Anthony R. Foglia, Deceased, Respondent; Phyllis Rispoli, Appellant.

In a contested accounting proceeding, the objectant appeals from (1) an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County, dated April 30, 1968, which denied her motion for reargument of a prior decision of said court (denominated in the record as an “order”) dated February 13, 1968, directing *sua sponte*that her jury demand be struck out, and (2) said decision. Appeals dismissed, without costs; the order and the decision are nonappealable. No appeal lies from an order denying reargument *(Matter of Barbaro*v. *Wyman,*32 A D 2d 740; *Sklan*v. *Sklan,*29 A D 2d 526; *Schiff*v. *Doctors Hosp.,*29 A D 2d 534; *Matter of Eaton v. Paulson,*29 A D 2d 945). Similarly, no appeal lies from a decision *(Balk*v. *Frank,*29 A D 2d 685). Although the determination of February 13, 1968 is denominated an order, it is in fact a decision. However, we have considered the merits of appellant’s contentions and, if we were not required to dismiss the appeals, we would affirm the determinations. Brennan, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
# L_2016273EN.01003501.xml

| 8.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 273/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 273/35

---

Corrigendum to Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending Directive 2002/92/EC and Directive 2011/61/EU

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 173 of 12 June 2014
  )

On page 447, Article 61(5):

for:

‘5.   ESMA shall develop draft implementing technical standards to determine standard forms, templates and procedures for the notification or provision of information provided for in paragraph 2 of this Article and in Article 63(4).’,

read:

‘5.   ESMA shall develop draft implementing technical standards to determine standard forms, templates and procedures for the notification or provision of information provided for in paragraph 2 of this Article and in Article 63(3).’.

---
#### Hiram W. Whitman, Respondent, *v.*New York Condensed Milk Company, Appellant.

(Argued April 29, 1884;

decided May 6, 1884.)

*William M. Bruce*for motion.

*Charles C. Smith*opposed.

Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion.

All concur.

Appeal dismissed.
§ 760.1805 Qualifying disaster events. ( a ) A producer is eligible for payments under this subpart only if the producer's affected production of an eligible crop suffered a crop quality loss due to a qualifying disaster event.
( b ) A crop quality loss due to a qualifying disaster event must have occurred on acreage that was physically located in a county that received a: ( 1 ) Presidential Emergency Disaster Declaration authorizing public assistance for categories C through G or individual assistance due to a qualifying disaster event occurring in the 2018 or 2019 calendar years; or
( 2 ) Secretarial Disaster Designation for a qualifying disaster event occurring in the 2018 or 2019 calendar years.
( c ) A producer with a crop quality loss on acreage not physically located in a county that was eligible under paragraph (b) of this section will be eligible for the QLA Program for losses due to qualifying disaster events only if the producer provides supporting documentation from which the FSA county committee determines that the crop quality loss on the unit was reasonably related to a qualifying disaster event as specified in this subpart. Supporting documentation may include furnishing climatological data from a reputable source or other information substantiating the claim of loss due to a qualifying disaster event.
****Bulletin No. 99-07, Supplement 6****
****OMB Home****

November 23, 1999

BULLETIN NO. 99-07, Supplement No. 6

TO THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND ESTABLISHMENTS

SUBJECT:  Apportionment Under the Extension of the Continuing Resolution for FiscalYear 2000

1. **Purpose and background**.  H. J. Res. 80 extends the continuingresolution through December 2, 1999.   

2. **Apportionment**.  I am extending the automatic apportionmentspecified in section 2 of OMB Bulletin No. 99-07 to December 2, 1999.  The portion of the yearcovered is now 17.2 percent.

If you can justify amounts greater than the amount automatically apportioned, please submitawritten request for apportionment.

**Jacob J. Lew***Director*
Privacy Statement
The BudgetLegislative InformationManagement Reform/GPRAGrants ManagementFinancial ManagementProcurement PolicyInformation & Regulatory Policy

Help

T H E   W H I T E   H O U S E
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2880 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Propamocarb HCL (Previcur). 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 19, 2006 

Mr. BURR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Propamocarb HCL 

(Previcur). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROPAMOCARB HCL (PREVICUR). 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.12.03 Mixtures of propyl 3- 

(dimethylamino) 

propylcarbamate 

monohydrochloride 

(Propamocarb hydrochloride) 

(CAS No. 25606–41–1) and 

application adjuvants (provided for in subheading 

3808.20.50) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•S 2880 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS