alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# 52.237 [Reserved]

- 52.237-1 Site Visit. 
- 52.237-2 Protection of Government Buildings, Equipment, and Vegetation. 
- 52.237-3 Continuity of Services. 
- 52.237-4 Payment by Government to Contractor. 
- 52.237-5 Payment by Contractor to Government. 
- 52.237-6 Incremental Payment by Contractor to Government. 
- 52.237-7 Indemnification and Medical Liability Insurance. 
- 52.237-8 Restriction on Severance Payments to Foreign Nationals. 
- 52.237-9 Waiver of Limitation on Severance Payments to Foreign Nationals. 
- 52.237-10 Identification of Uncompensated Overtime. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 52.2 - Text of Provisions and Clauses
3.405 Misrepresentations or violations of the Covenant Against Contingent Fees.       (a)                    						            Government personnel who suspect or have evidence of attempted or actual exercise of improper influence, misrepresentation of a contingent fee arrangement, or other violation of the Covenant Against Contingent Fees shall report the matter promptly to the contracting officer or appropriate higher authority in accordance with agency procedures.                                          (b)                    						            When there is specific evidence or other reasonable basis to suspect one or more of the violations in paragraph (a) of this section, the chief of the contracting office shall review the facts and, if appropriate, take or direct one or more of the following, or other, actions:                                                         (1)                          								                If before award, reject the bid or proposal.                                                            (2)                          								                If after award, enforce the Government’s right to annul the contract or to recover the fee.                                                            (3)                          								                Initiate suspension or debarment action under subpart  9.4.                                                            (4)                          								                Refer suspected fraudulent or criminal matters to the Department of Justice, as prescribed in agency regulations.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 3.4 - Contingent Fees
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

vs. CASE NO. 4:01cr47-SPM/AK

CHRISTOPHER BROWN,

Defendant.

___________________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s report

and recommendation dated June 7, 2005 (doc. 149). Defendant has been

furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section

636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the report and

recommendation, I have determined that the report and recommendation should

be adopted.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 149) is

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Defendant’s motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (doc. 117) along with the additional claim alleged

Case 4:01-cr-00047-MW-AK Document 161 Filed 08/05/05 Page 1 of 2
(doc. 142) is denied. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 4th day of August, 2005.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 4:01-cr-00047-MW-AK Document 161 Filed 08/05/05 Page 2 of 2
HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 25970 1988
HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 25971 1988
HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 25972 1988
HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 25973 1988
HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 25974 1988
HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 25975 1988
HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 25976 1988
HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 25977 1988
HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 25978 1988
HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 25979 1988
HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 25980 1988
HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 25981 1988
HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 25982 1988
HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 25983 1988
HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 25984 1988
HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 25985 1988
HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 25986 1988
HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 25987 1988
HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 25988 1988
HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 25989 1988
HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 25990 1988
HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 25991 1988
HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 25992 1988
HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 25993 1988
#### § 58.525 Storage of finished product.

Cottage cheese after packaging shall be promptly stored at a temperature of 45 °F. or lower to maintain quality and condition until loaded for distribution. During distribution and storage prior to sale the product should be maintained at a temperature of 45 °F. or lower. The product shall not be exposed to foreign odors or conditions such as drippage or condensation that might cause package or product damage. Packaged cottage cheese shall not be placed directly on floors.
§ 772.3 Compliance. ( a ) *Requirements.* No Minor Program borrower shall directly, or through contractual or other arrangement, subject any person or cause any person to be subjected to discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, or disability. Borrowers must comply with all applicable Federal laws and regulations regarding equal opportunity in hiring, procurement, and related matters. AMP borrowers are subject to the nondiscrimination provisions applicable to Federally assisted programs contained in 7 CFR part 15, subparts A and C, and part 15b. IMP loans are subject to the nondiscrimination provisions applicable to federally conducted programs contained in 7 CFR parts 15d and 15e.
( b ) *Reviews.* In accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Agency will conduct a compliance review of all Minor Program borrowers, to determine if a borrower has directly, or through contractual or other arrangement, subjected any person or caused any person to be subjected to discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin. The borrower must allow the review official access to their premises and all records necessary to carry out the compliance review as determined by the review official.
( c ) *Frequency and timing.* Compliance reviews will be conducted no later than October 31 of every third year until the Minor Program loan is paid in full or otherwise satisfied.
( d ) *Violations.* If a borrower refuses to provide information or access to their premises as requested by a review official during a compliance review, or is determined by the Agency to be not in compliance in accordance with this section or Departmental regulations and procedures, the Agency will service the loan in accordance with the provisions of § 772.16 of this part.
§ 900.301 Definitions. As used in this subpart and in all supplementary instructions, forms, and documents, unless the context or subject matter otherwise requires, the following terms shall have the following meanings: ( a ) *Act. Act* means Public Act No. 10, 73d Congress (48 Stat. 31), as amended, and as re-enacted and amended by the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937 (50 Stat. 246), as amended.
( b ) *Department. Department* means the United States Department of Agriculture.
( c ) *Secretary. Secretary* means the Secretary of Agriculture of the United States, or any officer or employee of the Department to whom authority has heretofore been delegated, or to whom authority may hereafter be delegated, to act in his stead.
( d ) *Administrator. Administrator* means the Administrator of the Agricultural Marketing Service, with power to redelegate, or any officer or employee of the Department to whom authority has been delegated or may hereafter be delegated to act in his stead.
( e ) *Person. Person* includes any individual, partnership, corporation, association, and any other business unit.
( f ) *Order. Order* means the marketing order (including an amendatory order) with respect to which the Secretary has directed that a referendum be conducted.
( g ) *Producer. Producer* means any person who is a dairy farmer and who, during the representative period, met the requirements of the term *producer* as defined in the order had such order been in effect during the representative period.
( h ) *Handler. Handler* means any person who, during the representative period, met the requirements of the term *handler* as defined in the order had such order been in effect during the representative period.
( i ) *Referendum agent. Referendum agent* means the person designated by the Secretary to conduct the referendum.
( j ) *Representative period. Representative period* means the period designated by the Secretary pursuant to section 8c of the Act (7 U.S.C. 608c).
( k ) *Cooperative association. Cooperative association* means any association of producers that the administrator has found to be qualified pursuant to section 608c(12) of the Act.
[30 FR 15412, Dec. 15, 1965, as amended at 37 FR 8059, Apr. 25, 1972]
#### § 900.105 Notification.

The Administrator, acting on behalf of the Secretary will notify the applicant as to whether he considers that mediation will effectuate the purpose of the act and as to whether he will mediate.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 99 (Thursday, May 22, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 29324]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-11860]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2013-0731; Airspace Docket No. 13-ASO-18]

Establishment of Class E Airspace; Blairsville, GA.

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule: correction

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action corrects the effective date of a final rule, 
published in the Federal Register on April 2, 2014, establishing 
controlled airspace at Blairsville Airport, Blairsville, GA.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, The effective date of the final rule 
published on April 2, 2014 is corrected from May 27, 2014, to May 29, 
2014. The Director of the Federal Register approves this incorporation 
by reference action under title 1, Code of Federal Regulations, part 
51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and publication 
of conforming amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Fornito, Operations Support 
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O. 
Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404) 305-6364.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    On April 2, 2014, the FAA published a final rule in the Federal 
Register establishing Class E airspace at Blairsville Airport, 
Blairsville, GA (79 FR 18442). After publication, the FAA found that 
the effective date was incorrectly typed as May 27, 2014, instead of 
May 29, 2014. This action makes the correction.

Correction to Final Rule

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the 
effective date listed under DATES heading on Docket No. FAA-2013-0731, 
establishing Class E airspace at Blairsville Airport, Blairsville, GA, 
as published in the Federal Register of April 2, 2014, (79 FR 18442), 
FR Doc. 2014-07292, is corrected as follows:

0
On page 18442, column 2, line 44, remove, ``May 27'', and add in its 
place ``May 29.''

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on May 15, 2015.
Myron A. Jenkins,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic 
Organization.
[FR Doc. 2014-11860 Filed 5-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
5622.103-4 Approvals.    (a) The contracting officer is designated the agency approving official.              HQ, United States Special Operations Command       Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L-K)       SOFARS 5622       February 2014 **Parent topic:** 5622.103 Overtime.
232.001 Definitions.

“Incremental funding” means the partial funding of a contract or an exercised option, with additional

funds anticipated to be provided at a later time.

Parent topic: Part 232 - CONTRACT FINANCING
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Authority:

7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 800.16 Certification requirements for export grain.

(a) *General.* Official Export Grain Inspection and Weight Certificates, Official Export Grain Inspection Certificates, and Official Export Grain Weight Certificates for bulk or sacked grain shall be issued according to § 800.162 for export grain loaded by an export elevator. Only these types of export certificates showing the official grade, official aflatoxin test results if required under the Act and the regulations, and/or the Class X weight of the grain shall be considered to be in compliance with inspection and weighing requirements under the Act for export grain.

(b) *Promptly furnished.* Export certificates shall be considered promptly furnished if they are forwarded by the shipper or the shipper's agent to the consignee not later than 10 business days after issuance.

[50 FR 49668, Dec. 4, 1985, as amended at 57 FR 2439, Jan. 22, 1992]
§ 760.1304 Eligibility. ( a ) Payment under DELAP will only be made to producers, but the dairy “operation” must first qualify its production within limits provided for in this subpart in order to have the individuals or entities that qualify as “producers” receive payment subject to whatever additional limits (such as the adjusted gross income provisions of these regulations) apply. As needed the agency may construe the terms of this regulation in any manner needed to facilitate and expedite payments using existing data and records from other assistance programs. Further, those parties (State and local governments and their political subdivisions and related agencies) excluded from the MILC program will not be eligible for DELAP payments notwithstanding any other provision of these regulation. That said, to be eligible to receive payments under this subpart, a dairy producer in the United States must: ( 1 ) Have produced milk in the United States and commercially marketed the milk produced any time during February 2009 through July 2009;
( 2 ) Be a producer, as defined in § 760.1302;
( 3 ) Provide FSA with proof of milk production commercially marketed by all dairy producers in the dairy operation during February 2009 through July 2009; and
( 4 ) Submit an accurate and complete request for benefits as specified in § 760.1303, if production data is not available in the FSA county office.
( b ) To be eligible to receive a payment, each producer in an eligible dairy operation must meet the average adjusted gross income eligibility requirements of 7 CFR part 1400. No person or entity will be eligible to receive any payment or direct or indirect benefit under this subpart if their annual average adjusted nonfarm income is over $500,000 as determined under 7 CFR part 1400. In the case of indirect benefits, direct benefits to other parties will be reduced accordingly. This will mean that all of the attribution rules of part 1400 will apply. For example if Individual A is over the limit and owns 100 percent of Corporation C which had a 20 percent interest in Corporation B which had a 50 percent interest in milk producer Corporation A, the AGI of Individual A would result in a 10 percent (100 percent times 20 percent times 50 percent) loss in benefits to Corporation A. For DELAP, the relevant period for the annual average adjusted nonfarm income is 2005 through 2007. ( 1 ) Individual dairy producers in a dairy operation that is an entity are only eligible for a payment based on their share of the dairy operation.
( 2 ) No payment will be made to any other producer based on the share of any dairy producer who exceeds the income limit or who, because of the attribution rules, has their payment reduced.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) 2:06mj72-DRB

)

JOSHUA WAYNE HESTER )

ORDER ON MOTIONS

At the initial appearance today for this defendant on a criminal complaint filed July 24,

2006) (Doc. 1), the court appointed counsel made an oral motion for a preliminary hearing. The

United States filed its Motion for Detention Hearing (Doc. 3, August 1, 2006), it is, therefore, 

ORDERED that defendant’s oral motion for a preliminary hearing is GRANTED, and

the Government’s Motion is GRANTED to the extent of its request for a detention hearing. The

preliminary hearing and detention hearing are consolidated for hearing at 3:00 p.m. on August 2,

2006, in District Courtroom 4A, Frank M. Johnson United States Courthouse Complex, 1 Church

Street, Montgomery, AL 36104.

Pending the hearing, the defendant shall be held in the custody of the U.S. Marshal and

produced for the hearing. 

Done this 1 day of August, 2006. st

/s/ Vanzetta Penn McPherson

VANZETTA PENN MCPHERSON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

FOR 

DELORES R. BOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-mj-00072-DRB Document 5 Filed 08/01/2006 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

M IDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABA M A

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

May 29, 2007

NOTICE OF CORRECTION

From: Clerk’s Office

Case Style: Stinnett Group, LLC v. Auto Owners Insurance

Case Number: 1:06cv00634-WKW

This Notice of Correction was filed in the referenced case this date to correct the PDF

document previously attached. 

The correct PDF document is attached to this notice for your review. Reference is made to

document # 13 filed on May 25, 2007.

Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 14 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MICHAEL HILL,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 351 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 25th day of November, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
Exhibit 99.8    Consent of Independent Auditors
 
 We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-153098, 333-168589, and 333-168590) of Ur-Energy Inc. of our report dated March 17, 2011 relating to the consolidated financial statements of the Company included in this Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2010.
 
 We hereby consent to the inclusion in Ur-Energy Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 of our audit report dated March 17, 2011 relating to the consolidated balance sheets as at December 31, 2010 and 2009, consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss and deficit and cash flows for the three years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 and the cumulative period from March 22, 2004 to December 31, 2010 of Ur-Energy Inc.
 Chartered Accountants
 Vancouver, Canada
 March 17, 2011
---

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

I, William J. Tafuri, President, Secretary, Treasurer and
Director of Yellowcake Mining Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(i)  | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company, for the
      fiscal year ended July 31, 2007, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
|---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|(ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                   

|By:    | /s/ William J. Tafuri                       
|------ | --------------------------------------------
|Name:  | WILLIAM J. TAFURI                           
|Title: | President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director
|       | (Principal Executive Officer)               
|Date:  | November 8, 2007                            

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the
Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-KSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-KSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Authority:

7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 800.138 Conflict of interest.

Official personnel cannot perform or participate in performing or issue an official certificate for an appeal inspection if they participated in the original inspection, reinspection, or, in the case of a Board appeal inspection, the appeal inspection service unless there is only one qualified person available at the time and place of the appeal inspection.

[50 FR 45395, Oct. 31, 1985]