alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Filed: October 7, 2011 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6535

(1:10-cv-00203-LO-TRJ)

PIPER ANN ROUNTREE,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

GENE JOHNSON, of the Dept. of Correction of the Commonwealth 

of Virginia,

Respondent – Appellee. 

O R D E R

The Court amends its opinion filed October 5, 2011, as 

follows:

On page 2, second line of text -- the word “his” is 

corrected to read “her.” 

For the Court – By Direction

/s/ Patricia S. Connor

Clerk
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6535

PIPER ANN ROUNTREE,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

GENE JOHNSON, of the Dept. of Correction of the Commonwealth 

of Virginia,

Respondent – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District 

Judge. (1:10-cv-00203-LO-TRJ)

Submitted: September 29, 2011 Decided: October 5, 2011

Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Piper Ann Rountree, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Mozley Harris, 

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Piper Ann Rountree seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on her 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record 

and conclude that Rountree has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1/32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with
the Annual Report of Mariposa Resources, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-K for
the year ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nanuk Warman, Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that: (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned
has executed this certification as of the 9 day of October, 2009.  /s/
Nanuk Warman  Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial
Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

DAVID W. JAHN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-623-MEF

)

REGINALD JAMES WASHINGTON, )

et al., )

)

Defendants. )

O R D E R

It is hereby ORDERED that the Uniform Scheduling Order (Doc. #6) entered by the

court on September 18, 2006 is VACATED. A new scheduling order will be entered.

DONE this the 9th day of November, 2006.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 10 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 1 of 1
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3063 

To extend the patent term for the badge of the Sons of the American 

Legion, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. TALENT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To extend the patent term for the badge of the Sons of 

the American Legion, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PATENT TERM EXTENSION FOR THE BADGE OF 

4 THE SONS OF THE AMERICAN LEGION. 

5 The term of a certain design patent numbered 92,187 

6 (for the badge of the Sons of the American Legion) is re7 newed and extended for a period of 14 years beginning 

8 on the date of enactment of this Act, with all the rights 

9 and privileges pertaining to such patent. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 31.2  I, Hongcheng Liu, in my capacity indicated below, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of China Shuangji Cement Ltd. (the Registrant); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusion about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; 5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  Date: May 12, 2009 /s/ Hongcheng Liu Hongcheng Liu, CFO (as Principal Financial Officer)
Subpart 6.1 - Full and Open Competition

Parent topic: Part 6 - Competition Requirements

6.100 Scope of subpart.

This subpart prescribes the policy and procedures that are to be used to promote and provide for full

and open competition.

6.101 Policy.

(a) 10 U.S.C. 3201 and 41 U.S.C.3301 require, with certain limited exceptions (see subpart 6.2 and

6.3), that contracting officers shall promote and provide for full and open competition in soliciting

offers and awarding Government contracts.

(b) Contracting officers shall provide for full and open competition through use of the competitive

procedure(s) contained in this subpart that are best suited to the circumstances of the contract

action and consistent with the need to fulfill the Government’s requirements efficiently ( 10 U.S.C.

3201 and 41 U.S.C.3301).

6.102 Use of competitive procedures.

The competitive procedures available for use in fulfilling the requirement for full and open

competition are as follows:

(a) Sealed bids. (See 6.401(a).)

(b) Competitive proposals. (See 6.401(b).) If sealed bids are not appropriate under paragraph (a) of

this section, contracting officers shall request competitive proposals or use the other competitive

procedures under paragraph (c) or (d) of this section.

(c) Combination of competitive procedures. If sealed bids are not appropriate, contracting officers

may use any combination of competitive procedures (e.g., two-step sealed bidding).

(d) Other competitive procedures.

(1) Selection of sources for architect-engineer contracts in accordance with the provisions of 40

U.S.C. 1102 et seq. is a competitive procedure (see subpart 36.6 for procedures).

(2) Competitive selection of basic and applied research and that part of development not related to

the development of a specific system or hardware procurement is a competitive procedure if award

results from-

(i) A broad agency announcement that is general in nature identifying areas of research interest,

including criteria for selecting proposals, and soliciting the participation of all offerors capable of
satisfying the Government’s needs; and

(ii) A peer or scientific review.

(3) Use of multiple award schedules issued under the procedures established by the Administrator of

General Services consistent with the requirement of 41 U.S.C.152(3)(A) for the multiple award

schedule program of the General Services Administration is a competitive procedure.
#### PEOPLE ex rel. BROADHEAD, Appellant, v. CITY OF BUFFALO, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

May 23, 1906.)

Proceedings by the people, on the relation of John R. Broadhead, against the city of Buffalo.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1,000
<CASH>                                           4,570
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,507
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,760)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,621
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,451
<PP&E>                                          14,372
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (9,790)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,593
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,167
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           106
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,042
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    47,593
<SALES>                                         52,896
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,896
<CGS>                                           32,697
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,697
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,824
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,182
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 825
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,632)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,632)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,632)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.61)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 400.56 Administrative appeal exhaustion.

The insured may appeal the approved APH yield in accordance with the procedures contained in 7 CFR part 400, subpart J. Administrative remedies through the appeal process must be exhausted prior to any action for judicial review. The approved APH yield determined as a result of the appeal process will be the yield applicable to the crop year.
#### § 766.252 Unauthorized assistance resulting from submission of false information.

A borrower is ineligible for continued Agency assistance if the borrower, or a third party on the borrower's behalf, submits information to the Agency that the borrower knows to be false.
5624.203 Policy.

(Revised June 2021)

Each contracting office shall utilize their component's Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) office

process. Contracting offices may contact USSOCOM Command Information Services Division FOIA

Manager (SOCS-SJS-VI) for additional assistance.

HQ, United States Special Operations Command

Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L)

SOFARS 5624

February 2007

Parent topic: Subpart 5624.2 - FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT
52.249-1 Termination for Convenience of the Government (Fixed-Price) (Short Form).       As prescribed in 49.502(a)(1), insert the following clause:          Termination for Convenience of the Government (Fixed-Price) (Short Form) (Apr 1984)          The Contracting Officer, by written notice, may terminate this contract, in whole or in part, when it is in the Government’s interest. If this contract is terminated, the rights, duties, and obligations of the parties, including compensation to the Contractor, shall be in accordance with part  49 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation in effect on the date of this contract.          (End of clause)          *Alternate I*                (Apr 1984). If the contract is for dismantling, demolition, or removal of improvements, designate the basic clause as paragraph (a) and add the following paragraph (b):             (b) Upon receipt of the termination notice, if title to property is vested in the Contractor under this contract, it shall revest in the Government regardless of any other clause of the contract, except for property that the Contractor (a) disposed of by bona fide sale or (b) removed from the site.    **Parent topic:** 52.249 [Reserved]
v149039_ex10-1 -- Converted by SECPublisher 2.1.1.8, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing


     

    
      Exhibit
10.1
Subpart 5131.2 - Contracts with Commercial

Organizations

Parent topic: Part 5131 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures

5131.205 Selected costs.

5131.205-6 Compensation for personal services.

(g)(6) Severance pay. The Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology) is

permitted to waive certain cost allowability limitations as set forth in FAR 31.205-6(g)(6). See

Appendix GG for further delegation.

(p)(4)(iii) Limitation on allowability of compensation. The Assistant Secretary of the Army

(Acquisition, Logistics and Technology) may establish exceptions as described at FAR

31.205-6(p)(4)(iii). See Appendix GG for further delegation.
§ 633.8 Cost-share payments. ( a ) In addition to annual payments, the NRCS may share the cost with program participants of protecting the wetland functions and values of the enrolled land as provided in the conservation plan. The NRCS may pay up to 75 percent of such costs.
( b ) Cost-share payments may be made only upon a determination by the NRCS that an eligible practice or an identifiable unit of the practice has been established in compliance with appropriate standards and specifications. Identified practices may be implemented by the program participant or other designee.
( c ) A program participant may seek additional cost-share assistance from other public or private organizations as long as the activities funded are in compliance with this part. In no event shall the program participant receive an amount which exceeds 100 percent of the total actual cost of the practices.
**Exhibit 23.2**

**CONSENT OF MCGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP**

**INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement (No. 333-140007) on Form S-8 of Guidance Software, Inc. andsubsidiary of our report dated April 4, 2005, except for Notes 16 and 17, as to which the date is September 15, 2006 relating to our audit of the 2004 consolidated statements of operations, stockholders deficit, and cash flows and thefinancial statement schedule which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Guidance Software, Inc. for year ended December 31, 2006. 

/s/McGladrey & Pullen, LLP 

Pasadena, California 

March 29, 2007
#### § 707.1 Applicability.

This part applies to all programs in title 7 of the Code of Federal Regulations which are administered by the Farm Service Agency under which payments are made to eligible program participants. This part also applies to all other programs to which this part is applicable by the individual program regulations.
Case 2:06-mj-00072-DRB Document 2 Filed 07/24/2006 Page 1 of 1
§ 52.1844 Definition of terms. ( a ) *Capstems* means small woody stems exceeding 1 ⁄ 8-inch in length which attach the raisins to the branches of the bunch.
( b ) A *piece of stem* means a portion of the branch or main stem.
( c ) *Seeds* refers to whole, fully developed seeds which have not been removed during the processing of seeded raisins with seeds.
( d ) *Damaged raisins* means raisins affected by sunburn, scars, insect injury, mechanical injury, or other similar means which seriously affect the appearance, edibility, keeping quality, or shipping quality of the raisins. In seeded Raisins with Seeds, mechanical injury resulting from normal seeding operations is not considered damage.
( e ) *Sugared* means either external or internal sugar crystals are present and the accumulation of such crystallized fruit sugars in the flesh or on the surface of the raisins is readily apparent.
( f ) *Grit, sand, or silt* means any particle or earthy material.
( g ) *Moisture* means the percentage by weight of the processed raisins, exclusive of branch and heavy stem material, that is moisture when determined by the “Dried Fruit Moisture Tester Method” or in accordance with other methods that give equivalent results.
( h ) *Slightly discolored* means a raisin affected by a brown to dark brown discolored area around the capstem end of the raisin that is less than the area of a circle 1 ⁄ 8-inch in diameter.
( i ) *Discolored* means a raisin affected by a brown to dark brown discolored area around the capstem end of the raisin that equals or exceeds the area of a circle 1 ⁄ 8-inch in diameter; *Provided,* That the overall appearance, keeping quality, and edibility of the product are not seriously affected.
( j ) *Well-matured* means raisins that are full-fleshed, may have fine wrinkles and are rounded in appearance.
( k ) *Reasonably well-matured* means raisins that are reasonably full-fleshed and may have shallow wrinkles with thick edged ridges.
( l ) *Fairly well-matured* means raisins that are thin-fleshed and angular in appearance.
( m ) *Substandard development* means raisins that are practically lacking in flesh.
( n ) *Undeveloped* refers to extremely light berries that are lacking in sugary tissue indicating incomplete development; are reddish in color; are completely shriveled; have fine wrinkles on smaller units and moderately deep wrinkles on slightly larger units; and are commonly referred to as “worthless.”
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3095 

To suspend temporarily the duty on pedestal assembly, positive pressure 

relief valves. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. BROWNBACK introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on pedestal assembly, 

positive pressure relief valves. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PEDESTAL ASSEMBLY, POSITIVE PRESSURE RE4 LIEF VALVES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.94.05 Pedestal assembly, positive pressure relief valves (provided for in subheading 

9405.40.60) ............................................. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 3095 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

PATRICIA GARNER-RUSSO, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) 2:06-CV-626-WHA-DRB

)

STATE OF ALABAMA, et al., )

)

Defendants )

ORDER ON MOTION

After consideration of Defendant’s Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. 12) filed on August 29,

2006 by Defendant Jason Bonar, and for good cause, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Motion (Doc. 12) is GRANTED and Defendant Bonar’s deadline for

filing an answer or other responsive pleading is extended to September 12, 2006.

Done this 30 day of August, 2006. th

/s/ Delores R. Boyd

DELORES R. BOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 14 Filed 08/30/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### §§ 701.129-701.157 [Reserved]