alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2927 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2927

     To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Esfenvalerate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 23, 2006

  Mr. Carper introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Esfenvalerate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ESFENVALERATE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.45 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Esfenvalerate) is amended by 
striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# 5129.303 Application of state and local taxes to government contractors and subcontractors.

(a)  The Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology) shall perform the review as set forth in FAR 29.303(a).  See Appendix GG for further delegation. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 5129.3 - State and Local Taxes
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3049 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3049

      To suspend temporarily the duty on shield asy-steering gear.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

   Mr. Hatch introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To suspend temporarily the duty on shield asy-steering gear.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHIELD ASY-STEERING GEAR.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.87.01      Steering gear       Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         assemblies for                                                     31/2009
                         single-pinion
                         constant-ratio
                         electronic power
                         assisted steering
                         systems, rated at
                         80 amperes at 12
                         V, designed for
                         use in hybrid
                         motor vehicles of
                         heading 8703
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         8708.99.73)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
52.242-5 Payments to Small Business Subcontractors.       As prescribed in 42.1504, insert the following clause:          Payments to Small Business Subcontractors (Jan 2017)                                       (a)                   *Definitions*. As used in this clause-                *Reduced payment* means a payment that is for less than the amount agreed upon in a subcontract in accordance with its terms and conditions, for supplies and services for which the Government has paid the prime contractor.                *Untimely payment* means a payment that is more than 90 days past due under the terms and conditions of a subcontract, for supplies and services for which the Government has paid the prime contractor.                                          (b)                   *Notice*. The Contractor shall notify the Contracting Officer, in writing, not later than 14 days after-                                                         (1) 								                A small business subcontractor was entitled to payment under the terms and conditions of the subcontract; and                                                            (2) 								                The Contractor-                                                                           (i) 										                    Made a reduced or untimely payment to the small business subcontractor; or                                                                              (ii) 										                    Failed to make a payment, which is now untimely.                                                                                                                            (c)                   *Content of notice*. The Contractor shall include the reason(s) for making the reduced or untimely payment in any notice required under paragraph (b) of this clause.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.242 [Reserved]
THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE 217TH DISTRICT COURT OF ANGELINA COUNTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 21st

day of January, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

CODY WAYNE PENICK, Appellant

NO. 12-14-00128-CR; Trial Court No. 2013-0132

Opinion by Brian Hoyle, Justice.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

“THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record and briefs filed herein, and the 

same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that there was no error in the judgment.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the judgment of the court 

below be in all things affirmed, and that this decision be certified to the court below for 

observance.”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals 

for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly 

recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice of our Court 

of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of 

Tyler, this the 17th day of March, 2015.

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By: _______________________________

Chief Deputy Clerk
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3014 

To suspend temporarily the duty on phosphor-stronrium blue, strontium 

fluorophosphate, antimony. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 24, 2006 

Mr. REID (for Mr. ROCKEFELLER) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on phosphor-stronrium blue, 

strontium fluorophosphate, antimony. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PHOSPHOR-STRONRIUM BLUE, STRONTIUM 

4 FLUOROPHOSPHATE, ANTIMONY. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•S 3014 IS 

‘‘ 9902.32.39 Phosphor-stronrium blue, 

strontium fluorophosphate, 

antimony inorganic products 

of a kind used as 

luminophores (CAS Nos. 

12168–31–9, 1309–64–4 

and 1344–43–0) (provided 

for in subheading 

3206.50.00) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
#### § 760.614 Lack of access.

In addition to other provisions for eligibility provided for in this part, the Deputy Administrator may provide assistance to participants who suffered 2008 production losses that meet the lack of access provisions in 19 U.S.C. 2497(g)(7)(F), where deemed appropriate, and consistent with the statutory provision. Such a determination to exercise that authority, and the terms on which to exercise that authority, will be considered to be a determination of general effect, not a “relief” determination, and will not be considered by the Farm Service Agency to be appealable administratively either within FSA or before the National Appeals Division.
225.7902 Defense Trade Cooperation

Treaties.

This section implements the Defense Trade Cooperation (DTC) Treaties with Australia and the

United Kingdom and the associated Implementing Arrangements for DoD solicitations and contracts

that authorize prospective contractors and contractors to use the DTC Treaties to respond to DoD

solicitations and in the performance of DoD contracts.

225.7902-1 Definitions.

225.7902-2 Purpose.

225.7902-3 Policy.

225.7902-4 Procedures.

225.7902-5 Solicitation provision and contract clause.

Parent topic: Subpart 225.79 - EXPORT CONTROL
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. R AN DY J AME S J AN GU L A, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e llan t. N os . 10- 30044 & 10- 30045 D. C. No s . 4 : 0 2 - c r - 0 0 0 4 8 - SE H 4 : 0 3 - c r - 0 0 0 3 8 - SE H ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe D i s tr i c tof

M ont ana S a m E . H a ddon, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r14, 2010 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E , an dC L IF T O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. I n the s e c ons ol i da t e d c a s e s , R andyJ a m e s J angul aappe a l s f r om the 24- m o n th s e n te n c e im p o s e df o llo w in g th e r e v o c a tio n o f h is s up e rv is e dr e le a s e . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 , a n dw e a f f i rm. 

# FI LED JAN 04 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 30044 & 10- 30045 2 J a ngul ac ont e nds tha thi s s e nt e nc e i s s ubs t ant i ve l yunr e a s onabl e . I n l i ghtof th e to ta lityo f

th e c ir c u m s tan c e s , th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s s e n te n c e is s ub s tan tiv e ly r e a s o n ab le . Se e U

n ite d Sta tes v . Ca r ty , 52 0 F . 3d 98 4, 99 3 (9th C i r. 20 08 ) ( en b a n c ) . M o r e o v e r , th e d is tr ic t c o u rt d idn o t p r o c e du r a llye rr . Se e id. AF F I RME D.
Case 1:03-cv-00734-MEF-SRW Document 7 Filed 09/08/2003 Page 1 of 1
#### In the Matter of Daniel Dwyer, Appellant, v County of Suffolk, Sheriff’s Department, Respondent.

[816 NYS2d 151]

In a proceeding pursuant to CELR article 78 to review a determination of the County of Suffolk, Sheriff’s Department, dated September 24, 2003, which found the petitioner guilty of violating a stipulation dated October 16, 2002, settling certain disciplinary charges and automatically suspending him for a period of 50 days, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Burke, J.), entered August 24, 2005, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The petitioner is employed by the respondent County of Suffolk, Sheriff’s Department, as a Corrections Officer I. On October 16, 2002, the parties entered into a stipulation settling a disciplinary proceeding filed against him. ¡Pursuant to the stipulation, the petitioner admitted to violating the provisions of the parties’ collective bargaining agreement related to sick time, and was suspended for 60 days. 50 days of the suspension *905were “held in abeyance” during a one-year period of “disciplinary probation” while he remained on the respondent’s “Medical Evaluation Unit monitor list.” If no additional violations occurred during the probationary period, the remaining suspension was to be waived. Alternatively, in the event of a further violation, the 50-day suspension would be automatically imposed.

On or about September 24, 2003, after an investigation, the respondent concluded that the petitioner had committed additional violations and, in accordance with the stipulation, suspended him for an additional 50 days. The petitioner then commenced this proceeding to review the determination. By entering into a disciplinary stipulation, the petitioner waived his right to pursue the protections available under the collective bargaining agreement *(see Matter of Mawn v County of Suffolk,*17 AD3d 467, 468 [2005]; *Matter of Tankard v Abate,*213 AD2d 320, 321 [1995]; *Matter of Brothers v Pilgrim Psychiatric Ctr. of N.Y. State Off. of Mental Health,*131 AD2d 756, 757 [1987]).

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the record supports the respondent’s conclusion that the petitioner violated the terms of the disciplinary stipulation by, inter alia, utilizing an excess number of personal days and failing to submit documentation to the medical evaluation unit in order to substantiate his use of sick time (see *Walsh v New York State Thruway Auth.,*24 AD3d 755, 757 [2005]; *Matter of Davis v New York State Div. of Military & Nav. Affairs,*291 AD2d 778, 779 [2002]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court correctly concluded that the determination to impose the remaining 50-day suspension had a rational basis and was not arbitrary and capricious (see *Matter of Lyons v Whitehead,*2 AD3d 638, 639 [2003]).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Florio, J.P., Adams, Santucci and Lunn, JJ., concur.
§ 755.6 Availability of funds. ( a ) Payments under this part are subject to the availability of funds.
( b ) A reserve will be created to handle appeals and errors.
52.232-10 Payments under Fixed-Price Architect-Engineer Contracts.       As prescribed in 32.111(c)(1), insert the following clause:          Payments under Fixed-Price Architect-Engineer Contracts (Apr 2010)                                       (a) 						            Estimates shall be made monthly of the amount and value of the work and services performed by the Contractor under this contract which meet the standards of quality established under this contract. The estimates, along with any supporting data required by the Contracting Officer, shall be prepared by the Contractor and submitted along with its voucher.                                          (b) 						            After receipt of each substantiated voucher, the Government shall pay the voucher as approved by the Contracting Officer or authorized representative. The Contracting Officer shall require a withholding from amounts due under paragraph (a) of this clause of up to 10 percent only if the Contracting Officer determines that such a withholding is necessary to protect the Government’s interest and ensure satisfactory completion of the contract. The amount withheld shall be determined based upon the Contractor’s performance record under this contract. Whenever the Contracting Officer determines that the work is substantially complete and that the amount retained is in excess of the amount adequate for the protection of the Government, the Contracting Officer shall release the excess amount to the Contractor.                                          (c) 						            Upon satisfactory completion by the Contractor and final acceptance by the Contracting Officer of all the work done by the Contractor under the "Statement of Architect-Engineer Services", the Contractor will be paid the unpaid balance of any money due for work under the statement, including all withheld amounts.                                          (d) 						            Before final payment under the contract, or before settlement upon termination of the contract, and as a condition precedent thereto, the Contractor shall execute and deliver to the Contracting Officer a release of all claims against the Government arising under or by virtue of this contract, other than any claims that are specifically excepted by the Contractor from the operation of the release in amounts stated in the release.                                          (e) 						            Notwithstanding any other provision in this contract, and specifically paragraph (b) of this clause, progress payments shall not exceed 80 percent on work accomplished on undefinitized contract actions. A "contract action" is any action resulting in a contract, as defined in FAR subpart  2.1, including contract modifications for additional supplies or services, but not including contract modifications that are within the scope and under the terms of the contract, such as contract modifications issued pursuant to the Changes clause, or funding and other administrative changes.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.232 [Reserved]
225.403 World Trade Organization

Government Procurement Agreement and

Free Trade Agreements.

(c) For acquisitions of supplies covered by the World Trade Organization Government Procurement

Agreement, acquire only U.S.-made, qualifying country, or designated country end products unless—

(i) The contracting officer determines that offers of U.S.-made, qualifying country, or designated

country end products from responsive, responsible offerors are either—

(A) Not received; or

(B) Insufficient to fill the Government's requirements. In this case, accept all responsive, responsible

offers of U.S.-made, qualifying country, and eligible products before accepting any other offers;

(ii) A national interest waiver under 19 U.S.C. 2512(b)(2) is granted on a case-by-case basis. Except

as delegated in paragraphs (c)(i)(A) and (B) of this section, submit any request for a national interest

waiver to the Principal Director, Defense Pricing and Contracting in accordance with department or

agency procedures. Include supporting rationale with the request.

(A) The head of the contracting activity may approve a national interest waiver for a purchase by an

overseas purchasing activity, if the waiver is supported by a written statement from the requiring

activity that the products being acquired are critical for the support of U.S. forces stationed abroad.

(B) The Commander or Director, Defense Energy Support Center, may approve national interest

waivers for purchases of fuel for use by U.S. forces overseas; or

(iii) The acquisition is in support of operations in Afghanistan (see 225.7704-1 ).

Parent topic: Subpart 225.4 - TRADE AGREEMENTS
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

§ 800.30 Foreign commerce grain business. “Foreign commerce grain business” is defined as the business of buying grain for sale in foreign commerce or the business of handling, weighing, or transporting grain for sale in foreign commerce. This provision shall not include: ( a ) Any person who only incidentally or occasionally buys for sale, or handles, weighs, or transports grain for sale and is not engaged in the regular business of buying grain for sale, or handling, weighing, or transporting grain for sale;
( b ) Any producer of grain who only incidentally or occasionally sells or transports grain which the producer has purchased;
( c ) Any person who transports grain for hire and does not own a financial interest in such grain; or
( d ) Any person who buys grain for feeding or processing and not for the purpose of reselling and only incidentally or occasionally sells such grain as grain.
[48 FR 44455, Sept. 29, 1983]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

 _______________________________

JAMES PETTY, #124 252 *

Plaintiff, *

v. * 2:06-CV-639-WKW

RAY B. FINEDOR, et al., *

Defendants. *

 _______________________________

ORDER

On January 25, 2007 the court erroneously accepted and filed a Motion to Dismiss.

(Doc. No 28.) This motion is not properly before the court as it was submitted without

permission of the court. (See Doc. No. 4, pg. 2, ¶ 4 - “no motion for summary judgment,

motion to dismiss or any other dispositive motions . . . may be filed by any party

without permission of the court.”). The aforementioned order further directed that “[i]f any

pleading denominated as a . . . dispositive motion is sent to the court [without the requisite

permission having been granted], the court shall not file or otherwise treat the pleading as a

dispositive motion until and unless further order of the court.” Id. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Hardy on January 25, 2007

(Doc. No. 28), be stricken from the file and returned to Defendant Hardy for non-compliance

with the order of July 20, 2006.

Case 2:06-cv-00639-WKW-TFM Document 29 Filed 01/29/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

Done, this 29th day of January 2007.

 /s/Terry F. Moorer 

TERRY R. MOORER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00639-WKW-TFM Document 29 Filed 01/29/2007 Page 2 of 2
Subpart 5643.1 - GENERAL     **Parent topic:** Part 5643 - CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS5643.105 Availability of Funds    *(Revised October 2012)*       (c)       (1) Prior to issuing a modification that affects contract funding after the contract is physically complete, for which the appropriations may be either expired, cancelled, or closed, contracting officers must coordinate the action with the servicing Comptroller Office to ensure fund availability and prevent improper or illegal adjustments to cancelled appropriations. The contract file must contain documentation of the coordination efforts.       (2) Contracting officers will coordinate all modifications to contracts with expired, cancelled, or closed appropriation with the serving legal office prior to execution.       (d) Modifications must not be executed for the purpose of using or redistributing unspent balances of expired, closed, or cancelled appropriations without prior coordination with the serving legal office.              HQ, United States Special Operations Command       Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L)       SOFARS 5643       February 2007