alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exhibit104executiveof770







Exhibit 10.4 EXHIBIT A  SIMPSON MANUFACTURING CO, INC. 1994 EMPLOYEE STOCK BONUS PLAN  As Amended through December 7, 2015   1.The purpose of this Plan is to express appreciation to employees of Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and its direct and indirect subsidiaries, who have continued in this employment for more than ten years, for their contributions to the growth and success of the Company and its business.  2.Each employee of the Company or any direct or indirect subsidiary of the Company, who is not a participant in the Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. 2011 Incentive Plan, adopted April 26, 2011, and amended and restated April 21, 2015, and its predecessor plans, who is not a director or an officer of the Company or any direct or indirect subsidiary of the Company and who shall have been employed on a full-time basis for a period of not less than ten years by the Company or any direct or indirect subsidiary of the Company, shall be eligible to participate in this Plan (an “Eligible Employee”).  3.Under this Plan, each Eligible Employee designated by the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”), in its exclusive discretion, shall be awarded a bonus in the form of shares of common stock of the Company (“Common Stock”) and an amount of cash approximately equal to the amount of federal and state social security and income tax and other amounts required to be withheld by such Eligible Employee’s employer with respect to such bonus.  4.As Eligible Employees designated by this Board, in its exclusive discretion, reach their tenth, twentieth, thirtieth, fortieth and fiftieth anniversaries of service as employees of the Company or any such subsidiary, the Board, in its exclusive discretion, shall determine the nature and amount of the bonuses, if any, that will be awarded to such Eligible Employees and the time or times of such awards under this Plan.  5.The aggregate number of shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance as bonuses under this Plan shall be 400,000 shares, including shares already awarded.  6.All bonuses awarded under this Plan shall be subject to withholding of Social Security and income and other taxes and levies in accordance with applicable law.  7.Each Eligible Employee who receives a bonus under this Plan shall, as a condition precedent to receiving such bonus, execute and deliver such agreement regarding sales of shares included in such bonus as the President, the Chief Financial Officer or the Secretary of the Company may require.  8.The Company shall not in any event have any obligation to award any bonus, to issue any shares of Common Stock or to pay any amount to any person under this Plan unless and until the Board shall have determined to do so in the specific case, and then only in accordance with such determination. The Board shall have the absolute right, in its exclusive discretion, to amend or modify this Plan at any time or times and to terminate this Plan at any time.
5610.001 Policy.

(Added April 2008)

(a) When to Conduct Market Research

(1) Contracting Officers have the responsibility of informing all requiring activities that, in

accordance with FAR 10.001 , market research is required prior to the development of new

specifications and before soliciting any requisition over the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT).

(2) Contract actions awarded above the SAT shall include documentation that market research was

conducted. The market research documentation may be completed using the DCG Market Research

Report template. In the case of other than full and open competition, a J&A or other similar format

that covers the information areas in FAR 10 and the DCG market research template may be used.

(b) Classified Procurements

(1) Classified Procurements: Market research for contracts that will be classified must be consistent

with the security requirements imposed by FAR 6.302-6 , National Security, where disclosure of the

agency’s needs would compromise the national security. Any number of common approaches or

practices for performing market research (See FAR 10.002 ) may be used except those where the

requirement or other salient characteristics of the requirement, having National Security

implications, would be disclosed in the public domain or where other aspects of the security plan for

the requirement would be violated.

HQ, United States Special Operations Command

Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L-K)

SOFARS 5610

February 2007

Parent topic: Subpart 5610.000 - SCOPE OF PART
#### §§ 766.116-766.119 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 35.1
                  SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                        RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC
           HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2006-HSA5 (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized officer of Residential Funding Company, LLC,
as servicer (the "Servicer")  pursuant to the Servicing  Agreement,  dated as of
September  28,  2006 (as  amended  from time to time,  the  "Agreement"),  among
Residential Funding Company, LLC (formerly Residential Funding Corporation),  as
master servicer,  JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as indenture trustee,  and the Home
Equity Loan Trust 2006-HSA5, as the issuing entity, does hereby certify that:


1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled  all of its  obligations  under  the  Agreement  in all  material
     respects throughout such period.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:      /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      ------------------------
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title:    Managing Director
Case 2:06-cv-00649-WHA-WC Document 25 Filed 03/28/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00649-WHA-WC Document 25 Filed 03/28/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00649-WHA-WC Document 25 Filed 03/28/2007 Page 3 of 3
Subpart 5609.1 - RESPONSIBLE PROSPECTIVE CONTRACTORS    **5609.105 Procedures**          **.** **Parent topic:** Part 5609 - CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS5609.105 Procedures.     5609.105-1 Obtaining Information.    (d) Contracting office chiefs must insure that SOF AT&L-KM is informed of all investigations being conducted by other agencies, including but not limited to, CID, OSI, and DCIS that affect ongoing USSOCOM contracts. Notification must be made as soon as practical and include as a minimum the contract number, name of contractor, investigating agencies, and the nature of the investigation.
#### § 917.69 Separability.

If any provision of this part is declared invalid or the applicability thereof to any person, circumstance, thing, or any particular kind of fruit is held invalid, the validity of the remainder of this part or the applicability thereof to any other person, circumstance, thing, or kind of fruit shall not be affected thereby.

###### Effective Date Note

#### Effective Date Note:

At 76 FR 66605, Oct. 27, 2011, § 917.69 was suspended indefinitely, effective Oct. 28, 2011.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Dominic Moffre, Appellant.

Memorandum by the Court. Appeal by defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court of Albany County, rendered January 10, 1968, which revoked probation and imposed sentence. An appeal may be taken from an amended judgment revoking probation and imposing sentence. *(People*v. *Ronald W. [Anonymous},*21 N Y 2d 744.) Defendant’s probation was revoked because he had committed a crime while on probation and under such circumstances the failure of the court to specify the conditions of probation in its original judgment is of no consequence. (See *People*v. *Ware,*29 A D 2d 557, affd. on rearg. 31 A D 2d 544; cf. Code of Grim. Pro., § 932.) The appellant’s contentions as to the invalidity of the original judgment are without merit. *(People*v. *Crandall,*278 App. Div. 1039.) Judgment affirmed. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court.
PD-0197-15

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

JESSICA NICOLE NANCE, APPELLANT

RECEIVED IN

vs- COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE -1UN 05 2015

APPEAL IN CAUSE NUMBER

AbelAcosJajClerk , CR1101695 rILcD \M

IN THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF

HUNT COUNTY, TEXAS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

JUN 10 20;5

MOTION FOR STAY OF MANDATE PENDING APPLICATION FOR CERTIORARI ^uusta> Clerk

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE CRIMINAL COURT OF APPEALS

Appellant Jessica Nance hereby move to stay the issuance of the mandate in the above

captioned action, pending the filing and disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari. See. Fed. R. App.

P. 41 (b); 9th Cir. R. 41-1. As grounds forthis motion defendantstates asfollows:

(1) Under Federal Appellate Rule 41 (b) this Court may stay the mandate upon Motion if the

moving party intends to file a petition for a writ of certiorari. The standards for issuance of a

stay in such circumstances are not exacting. "Ordinarily...a party seeking a stay of the mandate

following this Court's judgment need not demonstrate that exceptional circumstances justify a

stay." Bryant v. Ford Motor Co., 886 F.2d 1526,1528-29 (9th Cir. 1989); see U.S. v. Pete,525 F.

3d 844, 850 &n.9 (9th Cir. 2008); Campbell v.Wood, 20 F.3d 1050,1051 (9th Cir. 1994) (en

banc). Indeed, it "is often the case" that "the appellate mandate is stayed while a party seeks

certiorari from the Supreme Court. " Pete, 525 F. 3d at 850. Appellant's motion for stay of the

mandate satisfies these standards. A petition for certiorari would not be frivolous.
WHEREFORE, Defendants/Appellants respectfully but urgently , move the Court to stay

the issuance of mandate in this cause pending a ruling by the Supreme Court on

Defendants/Appellant's application for a writ of certiorari.

JESSICA NICOLE NANCE APPELLANT/ PRO SE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a printed copy of this MOTION FOR STAY OF MANDATE

PENDING APPLICATION FOR CERTIORARI was sent to Jason A. Duff 2615 Lee Street Po box 11

Greenville, Texas 75043, State of Texas Jeffery Kovach 2500 Lee Street, Greenville, Texas

75401 and the Sixth Court of Appeals 100 north State Line Ave. Ste. 20 Texarkana, Texas

75501.

J^6^3- aqjr\^_^ u (at [6

JESSICA NICOLE NANCE/ APPELLANT/ PRO SE
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Winslow Hunter, Appellant.

Motion to relieve assigned counsel denied as academic in view of the determination of this court on Appeal No. 6822 decided simultaneously herewith. Concur—Fein, J. P., Sandler, Sullivan, Bloom and Lupiano, JJ.
#### § 701.32 Failure to comply with program provisions.

Costs may be shared for performance actually rendered even though the minimum requirements otherwise established for a practice have not been satisfied if a reasonable effort was made to satisfy the minimum requirements and if the practice, as performed, will adequately address the need for the practice.
§ 59.204 Mandatory weekly reporting for swine. ( a ) *Weekly noncarcass merit premium report.* Not later than 4 p.m. central time in accordance with § 59.10(b) on the first reporting day of each week, the corporate officers or officially designated representatives of each packer processing plant shall report to the Secretary a noncarcass merit premium report that lists: ( 1 ) Each category of standard noncarcass merit premiums used by the packer in the prior slaughter week; and
( 2 ) The dollar value (in dollars per hundred pounds of carcass weight) paid to producers by the packer, by category.
( b ) *Premium list.* A packer shall maintain and make available to a producer, on request, a current listing of the dollar values (per hundred pounds of carcass weight) of each noncarcass merit premium used by the packer during the current or the prior slaughter week.
( c ) *Publication.* The Secretary shall publish the information obtained under this subsection as soon as practicable, but not later than 5 p.m. central time, on the first reporting day of each week.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3141 

To extend and modify the suspension of duty on Methyl N-(2-[[1-(4- 

chlorophenyl)-1H-pyrazol-3-yl]-oxymethyl]phenyl)-N-methoxycarbanose 

(Pyraclostrobin). 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. CHAMBLISS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend and modify the suspension of duty on Methyl 

N-(2-[[1-(4-chlorophenyl)-1H-pyrazol-3-yl]- 

oxymethyl]phenyl)-N-methoxycarbanose (Pyraclostrobin). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. METHYL N-(2-[[1-(4-CHLOROPHENYL)-1H4 PYRAZOL-3-YL]-OXYMETHYL]PHENYL)-N5 METHOXYCARBANOSE (PYRACLOSTROBIN). 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.01.21 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

8 Methyl N-(2-[[1-(4-chlorophenyl)-1H-pyrazol-3-yl]- 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•S 3141 IS 

1 oxymethyl]phenyl)-N-methoxycarbanose (Pyraclostrobin)) 

2 is amended— 

3 (1) by striking ‘‘Free’’ and inserting ‘‘6%’’; and 

4 (2) by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and inserting 

5 ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

7 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

8 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

9 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3143 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Diuron. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. CHAMBLISS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Diuron. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DIURON. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.13.26 Formulations of 3-(3,4- 

dichlorophenyl)–1,1- 

dimethylurea (CAS No. 

330–54–1) (Diuron) and application adjuvants (provided 

for in subheading 

3808.30.15) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 3143 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
DcfT-^sr-i^^l/'iTIl 

A 

Manistee County Blacker Airport Authority 

2323 Aiipoil Road • Manistee, Michigan 49660 '(231) 723-4351 

November 9th, 2010 

Dennis DeVany 

Chief, Essential Air Service Division, X-53 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Dear Mr. DeVany, 

At its regularly scheduled meeting on November 8'^, 2010, the Manistee County Blacker 

Airport Authority met to review the bids for Essential Air Service at Manistee, Ml received 

in response to order 2010-9-26. 

The Manistee County Blacker Airport Authority is composed of three Manistee County 

Commissioners, one City of Manistee representative and three at-large members to 

ensure that the interests of the community are broadly represented on the Authority. In 

addition the meeting w^as attended by a broad spectrum of the community including 

representatives from the area Economic Development Office, the local Convention and 

Visitors Bureau, the largest employer in the county, the local travel agency as v/eW as 

other interested citizens. 

After significant public comment and discussion of the merits of each proposal the 

Manistee County Blacker Airport Authority voted unanimously to recommend as its first 

preference the bid from Chautauqua Airlines operating as Frontier Airlines. The 

Authority also approved Chautauqua's requested waiver of the hold-in requirement with 

180 days notice. This preference should be viewed as superseding any previous 

statements of support in this on-going carrier selection process. 

The Airport Authority also made a secondary recommendation for Charter Air Transport 

along with Public Charters Inc. If the Department of Transportation were to eliminate the 

bid of Chautauqua from consideration, Manistee would be happy to accept the bid of 

Charter Air Transport. In this situation, the Authority would waive its right for Scheduled 

Air Transportation and accept regularly scheduled public charters as proposed by 

Charter Air Transport. 

Sincerely, 

Bany Lind 

Airport Manager 

Manistee County Blacker Airport^ 

c"^ 

^ 

O 

> 

CD 

ro 

_ ^ : " 1 • -• ' 

N

T OF 

FATION 

RATION 

CO
§ 785.9 Access to program records. The regulations in 2 CFR 200.334 through 200.338 provide general record retention and access requirements for records pertaining to grants. In addition, the State must maintain and provide the Government access to pertinent records regarding services delivered by the State's Certified Mediation Program for purposes of evaluation, audit and monitoring of the State Certified Mediation Program as follows: ( a ) For purposes of this section, pertinent records consist of: the names and addresses of applicants for mediation services; dates mediations opened and closed; issues mediated; dates of sessions with mediators; names of mediators; mediation services furnished to participants by the program; the sums charged to parties for each mediation service; records of delivery of services to prepare parties for mediation (including financial advisory and counseling services); and the outcome of the mediation services including formal settlement results and supporting documentation.
( b ) State mediators will notify all participants in writing at the beginning of the mediation session that the USDA, including the USDA Inspector General, the Comptroller General of the United States, the Administrator, and any of their representatives will have access to pertinent records as necessary to monitor and to conduct audits, investigations, or evaluations of mediation services funded in whole or in part by the USDA.
( c ) All participants in a mediation must sign and date an acknowledgment of receipt of such notice from the mediator. The State's Certified Mediation Program must maintain originals of such acknowledgments in its mediation files for at least 3 years.
[67 FR 57315, Sept. 10, 2002, as amended at 79 FR 75996, Dec. 19, 2014; 87 FR 13126, Mar. 9, 2022]
5639.105-90 Policy.

(d) The requiring activity will address the need for privacy protection in the specifications or

Statement of Work (SOW). Contracting officers will notify the appropriate organization or office

when it intends to issue a solicitation for items or services with an element of privacy protection.

Contracting officers will identify the point of contact or agency responsible for oversight of privacy

protection to the contractor after award.

HQ, United States Special Operations Command

Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L)

SOFARS 5639

February 2007

Parent topic: 5639.105 Privacy.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

141 

CA 09-02077 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

 

IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT SILLS AND AUDREY 

ELAINE SILLS, AS CO-EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE 

OF ANGELINE V. SILLS, DECEASED, 

PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS, 

 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

FLEET NATIONAL BANK, JOAN ROYSTON AND 

KIRK RICHARDSON, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS. 

------------------------------------------- 

AUDREY PATRONE PEARTREE, GUARDIAN AD LITEM, 

RESPONDENT. 

------------------------------------------- 

ROBERT SILLS AND AUDREY ELAINE SILLS, AS 

CO-EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF ANGELINE V. 

SILLS, DECEASED, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

V

 

FLEET BANK AND JOAN ROYSTON, 

DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. 

------------------------------------------- 

AUDREY PATRONE PEARTREE, GUARDIAN AD LITEM, 

RESPONDENT. 

------------------------------------------- 

ROBERT SILLS AND AUDREY ELAINE SILLS, AS 

CO-EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF ANGELINE V. 

SILLS, DECEASED, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

V

 

JOAN ROYSTON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. 

------------------------------------------- 

AUDREY PATRONE PEARTREE, GUARDIAN AD LITEM, 

RESPONDENT. 

(APPEAL NO. 2.) 

 

GATES & ADAMS, P.C., ROCHESTER (MICHAEL STEINBERG OF COUNSEL), FOR

PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS AND PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS. 

MCDONOUGH & ARTZ, P.C., BINGHAMTON (PHILIP J. ARTZ OF COUNSEL), FOR

RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT AND DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT JOAN ROYSTON. 

THE WOLFORD LAW FIRM LLP, ROCHESTER (ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD OF COUNSEL),

FOR RESPONDENT.
-2- 141 

CA 09-02077 

UNDERBERG & KESSLER LLP, ROCHESTER (PAUL V. NUNES OF COUNSEL), FOR

RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT FLEET NATIONAL BANK AND DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT

FLEET BANK.

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Steuben County (Peter

C. Bradstreet, A.J.), entered June 3, 2009. The order, among other

things, adjudged that all reasonable fees and disbursements incurred

by guardian ad litem Audrey Patrone Peartree in an appeal of the

court’s decision and order dated January 28, 2009 be paid for by the

Estate of Angeline V. Sills. 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed

without costs. 

Same Memorandum as in Sills v Fleet Natl. Bank ([appeal No. 1]

___ AD3d ___ [Feb. 18, 2011]). 

Entered: February 18, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court
52.214-25 Step Two of Two-Step Sealed Bidding.       As prescribed in 14.201-6(t), insert the following provision:          Step Two of Two-Step Sealed Bidding (Apr 1985)                                       (a) 						            This invitation for bids is issued to initiate step two of two-step sealed bidding under subpart  14.5 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation.                                          (b) 						            The only bids that the Contracting Officer may consider for award of a contract are those received from bidders that have submitted acceptable technical proposals in step one of this acquisition under _________________[*the Contracting Officer shall insert the identification of the step-one request for technical proposals*].                                          (c) 						            Any bidder that has submitted multiple technical proposals in step one of this acquisition may submit a separate bid on each technical proposal that was determined to be acceptable to the Government.                                 (End of provision)    **Parent topic:** 52.214 [Reserved]