alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Part 5622 - APPLICATION OF LABOR LAWS

TO GOVERNMENT ACQUISITIONS

5622.001 DEFINITIONS

Subpart 5622.1 - BASIC LABOR POLICIES

5622.103 Overtime.

5622.103-4 Approvals.

5622.001 DEFINITIONS

(Added January 2015)

The “Agency Labor Advisor” is an individual responsible for advising contracting agency officials on

Federal contract labor matters. The Agency Labor Advisor for USSOCOM is the Air Force Labor

Advisor (Eastern Region) who can be reached at http://www.wdol.gov/ala.aspx .

Subpart 5622.1 - BASIC LABOR POLICIES

(Added May 2014)

5622.103 Overtime.

5622.103-4 Approvals.

(a) The contracting officer is designated the agency approving official.

HQ, United States Special Operations Command

Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L-K)

SOFARS 5622

February 2014
#### § 70.100 Who may request an appeal grading or review of a grader's decision.

An appeal grading may be requested by any interested party who is dissatisfied with the determination by a grader of the class, quality, quantity, or condition of any product as evidenced by the USDA grademark and accompanying label, or as stated on a grading certificate, and a review may be requested by the operator of an official plant with respect to a grader's decision on any other matter relating to grading in an official plant.
Case 3:06-cv-00631-MHT-VPM Document 7 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

HAROLD KELLY MURPHY, * 

 * 

 Plaintiff, * 

 * 

v. * Case No.: 3:06-cv-618-MEF 

 * 

SOUTHERN ENERGY HOMES, INC., * 

 * 

 Defendants. * 

MOTION FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

 Defendant, Southern Energy Homes, Inc. (“Southern Energy”), moves this Court for 

entry of the attached Stipulated Protective Order and, as grounds, therefor, states as follows: 

 1. On or about June 14, 2006, Harold Kelly Murphy (hereinafter referred to as 

“Plaintiff”) commenced the above-styled action against Southern Energy. 

 2. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(f), the parties prepared and filed their Report of 

Parties’ Planning Meeting form. 

 3. In accordance with the Planning Meeting form, the parties exchanged their 

respective Rule 26(a) Initial Disclosures. As noted on Southern Energy’s Initial Disclosures, 

some of the information it desires to produce is proprietary and should be kept confidential. 

 4. The Parties have mutually agreed upon a protective order which addresses the 

concerns of Southern Energy. The mutually agreed upon protective order is attached hereto as 

Exhibit A. 

 5. The parties are in the discovery phase of this litigation and, therefore, request that 

this Court entered the agreed upon protective order. 

Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 12-2 Filed 10/18/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

 WHEREFORE, Southern Energy Homes, Inc. respectfully request that this Court enter 

the attached Stipulated Protective Order and for such other relief as this Court deems 

appropriate. 

Respectfully submitted, 

 /s Mitchel H. Boles 

 Robert D. Segall (ASB-7354-E68R) 

 Lee H. Copeland (ASB-3461-O72L) 

 Mitchel H. Boles (ASB-0813-S69M) 

 

 Copeland, Franco, Screws & Gill, P.A. 

444 South Perry Street 

P. O. Box 347 

Montgomery, AL 36101-0347

Phone: 334/834-1180 

Facsimile: 334/834-3172 

Email: segall@copelandfranco.com

Email: copeland@copelandfranco.com

Email: boles@copelandfranco.com

Attorney for Southern Energy Homes, Inc. 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that on the 19th day of October, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing 

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing 

to the following: 

• Charles Lance Gould

lance.gould@beasleyallen.com holly.stroh@beasleyallen.com 

• Carter Gibson Vance

gibson.vance@beasleyallen.com heidi.bowers@beasleyallen.com 

/s Mitchel H. Boles 

Of Counsel 

Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 12-2 Filed 10/18/2006 Page 2 of 2
#### Lyman Bradley, Respondent, *v.*James Manning et al., Appellants.

(Argued June 12, 1884;

decided June 24, 1884.)

*Merritt King*for appellants.

*Gabriel L. Smith*for respondent.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
252.225-7043 Antiterrorism/Force Protection

for Defense Contractors Outside the United

States.

As prescribed in 225.372-2 , use the following clause:

ANTITERRORISM/FORCE PROTECTION POLICY FOR DEFENSE CONTRACTORS OUTSIDE THE

UNITED STATES (JUN 2015)

(a) Definition. “United States,” as used in this clause, means, the 50 States, the District of Columbia,

and outlying areas.

(b) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this clause, the Contractor and its subcontractors, if

performing or traveling outside the United States under this contract, shall—

(1) Affiliate with the Overseas Security Advisory Council, if the Contractor or subcontractor is a U.S.

entity;

(2) Ensure that Contractor and subcontractor personnel who are U.S. nationals and are in-country

on a non-transitory basis, register with the U.S. Embassy, and that Contractor and subcontractor

personnel who are third country nationals comply with any security related requirements of the

Embassy of their nationality;

(3) Provide, to Contractor and subcontractor personnel, antiterrorism/force protection awareness

information commensurate with that which the Department of Defense (DoD) provides to its military

and civilian personnel and their families, to the extent such information can be made available prior

to travel outside the United States; and

(4) Obtain and comply with the most current antiterrorism/force protection guidance for Contractor

and subcontractor personnel.

(c) The requirements of this clause do not apply to any subcontractor that is—

(1) A foreign government;

(2) A representative of a foreign government; or

(3) A foreign corporation wholly owned by a foreign government.

(d) Information and guidance pertaining to DoD antiterrorism/force protection can be obtained from

(Contracting Officer to insert applicable information cited in PGI 225.372-1 ).

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 252.225 RESERVED
# PART 1 —GENERAL

**Parent topic:**APPENDIX G - RESERVED Table Of Contents
#### § 58.914 Fillers.

Both gravity and vacuum type fillers shall be of sanitary design and all product contact surfaces, if metal, shall be made of stainless steel or equally corrosion-resistant material; except that, certain evaporated milk fillers having brass parts may be approved if free from corroded surfaces and kept in good repair. Nonmetallic product contact surfaces shall comply with the requirements for 3-A Sanitary Standards for Plastic, and Rubber and Rubber-Like Materials. Fillers shall be designed so that they in no way will contaminate or detract from the quality of the product being packaged.
# 52.225-16 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**52.225 [Reserved]
#### § 52.59 OMB control numbers assigned pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act.

The information collection requirements contained in this part have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the provisions of 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35 and have been assigned OMB control no. 0581-0123.

(44 U.S.C. Ch. 35)

[49 FR 23826, June 8, 1984]
252.228-7005 Mishap Reporting and

Investigation Involving Aircraft, Missiles, and

Space Launch Vehicles.

As prescribed in 228.371 (d), use the following clause:

MISHAP REPORTING AND INVESTIGATION INVOLVING AIRCRAFT, MISSILES, AND SPACE

LAUNCH VEHICLES (NOV 2019)

(a) The Contractor shall report promptly to the Administrative Contracting Officer all pertinent facts

relating to each mishap involving an aircraft, missile, or space launch vehicle being manufactured,

modified, repaired, or overhauled in connection with this contract.

(b) If the Government conducts an investigation of the mishap, the Contractor shall cooperate and

assist the Government's personnel until the investigation is complete.

(c) The Contractor shall include a clause in subcontracts under this contract to require

subcontractor cooperation and assistance in mishap investigations.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 252.228 RESERVED
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3142 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3142

 To suspend temporarily the duty on Mixtures containing 50% of Methyl 
   (E)-methoxyimino-2(2-o-tolyloxymethyl) phenyl) acetate (Kresoxim 
                                methyl).

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

 Mr. Chambliss introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on Mixtures containing 50% of Methyl 
   (E)-methoxyimino-2(2-o-tolyloxymethyl) phenyl) acetate (Kresoxim 
                                methyl).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MIXTURES CONTAINING 50% OF METHYL (E)-METHOXYIMINO-2(2-O-
              TOLYLOXYMETHYL) PHENYL) ACETATE (KRESOXIM METHYL).

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.38.49        Mixtures containing     Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           50% of Methyl (E)-                                                31/2009          ''
                           methoxyimino-2(2-o-                                                                 .
                           tolyloxymethyl)
                           phenyl) acetate
                           (Kresoxim methyl)
                           (CAS No. 143390-89-0)
                           (provided for in
                           subheading
                           3808.20.50)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered May 1 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 01039
- CR OLIVER BATTIE JR., Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court C ause No. F12
- 12860
- R



### O RDER
On February 18, 2015, this Court ordered Mary Snider, former official court reporter of the 265th Judicial District Court, to file a supplemental record containing State’s Exhibit no. 1 within fifteen days. To date, Ms. Snider has neither filed the supplemental record nor communicated with the Court regarding the status of the record. Accordingly, w e ORDER court reporter Mary Snider to file, by 4:00 p.m. on FRIDAY, MAY 8, 2015 , a supplemental record containing State’s Exhibit n o. 1. If the supplemental record with the exhibit is not filed by the date and time specified, we will order that Mary Snider not sit as a court reporter until she has filed the supplemental record in this appeal.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of thi s order, to the Honorable Jennifer Bennett, Presiding Judge, 265th Judicial District Court; the Honorable Rick Magnis, Presiding Judge,283rd Judicial District Court; Mary Snider, official court reporter, 283rd Judicial District Court;

and to counsel for a ll parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
52.241-12 Nonrefundable, Nonrecurring Service Charge.       As prescribed in 41.501(d)(6), insert a clause substantially the same as the following:          Nonrefundable, Nonrecurring Service Charge (Feb 1995)          As provided herein, the Government will pay a nonrefundable, nonrecurring charge when the rules and regulations of a Contractor require that a customer pay (1)a charge for the initiation of service, (2)a contribution in aid of construction, or (3)a nonrefundable membership fee. This charge may be in addition to or in lieu of a connection charge. Therefore, there is hereby added to the Contractor’s schedule a nonrefundable, nonrecurring charge for ___________ in the amount of $________ dollars payable .[*specify dates or schedules*]          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.241 Utility Services Provisions and Clauses.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Authority:

7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 868.81 Licensing procedures.

(a) *Application.* An application for a license, the renewal of a license, or the return of a suspended license shall be submitted to the Service on forms furnished by the Service. Each application shall be in English, be typewritten or legibly written in ink, show all information prescribed by the application form, and be signed by the applicant.

(b) *Examinations and reexaminations.* Applicants for a license and individuals who are licensed to perform any or all inspection services shall, at the discretion of the Service, submit to examinations or reexaminations to determine their competency to perform the inspection functions for which they desire to be or are licensed.

(c) *Termination* —

(1) *Procedure.* Each license shall terminate according to the termination date shown on the license and as specified by the schedule in this paragraph. The termination date for a license shall be no less than 3 years or more than 4 years after the issuance date for the initial license; thereafter, every 3 years. Upon request of a licensee and for good cause shown, the termination date may be advanced or delayed by the Administrator for a period not to exceed 60 days.

| Last name beginning with | Termination date |
| --- | --- |
| A | January. |
| B | February. |
| C, D | March. |
| E, F, G | April. |
| H, I, J | May. |
| K, L | June. |
| M | July. |
| N, O, P, Q | August. |
| R | September. |
| S, T, U, V | October. |
| W | November. |
| X, Y, Z | December. |

Termination Schedule

The Service shall issue a termination notice 60 days before the termination date. The notice shall give detailed instructions for requesting renewal of license, state whether a reexamination is required, and, if a reexamination is required, give the scope of the examination. Failure to receive a notice from the Service shall not exempt a licensee from the responsibility of having the license renewed by the termination date.

(2) *Exception.* The license of an individual under contract with the Service shall terminate upon termination of the contract.

(d) *Surrender of license.* Each license that is terminated or which is suspended or revoked under § 868.84 shall be promptly surrendered to the Administrator or other official of the Service designated by the Administrator.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0580-0012)

[53 FR 3722, Feb. 9, 1988. Redesignated and amended at 60 FR 16364, Mar. 30, 1995]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Peter Colon, Appellant.

Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 27, 1965, affirmed. In our opinion, defendant was not prejudiced by the failure to produce the attorneys formerly assigned to defend him as witnesses at the hearing held in this *coram nobis*proceeding. The court assumed the truth of defendant’s testimony, but found that his version of the circumstances surrounding his plea of guilty did not indicate that the plea was involuntary or coerced. We agree with that conclusion. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
# C_2014097EN.01000701.xml

| 2.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 97/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 97/7

---

COUNCIL DECISION

COUNCIL DECISION

of 24 March 2014

appointing and replacing members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training

2014/C 97/02

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 337/75 of 10 February 1975 establishing the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (1), and in particular Article 4 thereof,

1

Having regard to the nomination submitted by the United Kingdom government,

Whereas:

| (1) | By its Decision of 16 July 2012 (2), the Council appointed the members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 18 September 2012 to 17 September 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By its Decision of 16 July 2012 (2), the Council appointed the members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 18 September 2012 to 17 September 2015.

2

| (2) | A member’s seat is available for the United Kingdom on the Governing Board of the Centre in the category of Government representatives as a result of the resignation of Ms Marilyn EAST. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member’s seat is available for the United Kingdom on the Governing Board of the Centre in the category of Government representatives as a result of the resignation of Ms Marilyn EAST.

| (3) | The members of the Governing Board of the aforementioned Centre should be appointed for the remainder of the current term of office, which expires on 17 September 2015, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The members of the Governing Board of the aforementioned Centre should be appointed for the remainder of the current term of office, which expires on 17 September 2015,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The following persons are hereby appointed as members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the remainder of the term of office, which runs until 17 September 2015:

GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES:

| UNITED KINGDOM | Mr Ian PEGG |
| --- | --- |

UNITED KINGDOM

Mr Ian PEGG

Done at Brussels, 24 March 2014.

For the Council

The President

A. TSAFTARIS

---

(1)  OJ L 39, 13.2.1975, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2051/2004 (OJ L 355, 1.12.2004, p. 1).

1

(2)  OJ C 228, 31.7.2012, p. 3.

2

---
Page 1 of 2 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

LAVAROS DAVIS,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:20cv5935-MCR-HTC

SGT. DANIELS, et al.,

Defendants.

______________________/

ORDER

The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on October 26, 

2021 (ECF No. 39), recommending the motion be DENIED in part because Plaintiff 

properly exhausted his administrative remedies and GRANTED in part as to 

Plaintiff’s declaratory relief and Fourteenth Amendment claims. The Plaintiff was 

furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to 

file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). There 

were no timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed 

objections thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be 

adopted. 

Case No. 3:20cv5935-MCR-HTC 

Case 3:20-cv-05935-MCR-HTC Document 44 Filed 12/02/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2 

Case No. 3:20cv5935-MCR-HTC 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows: 

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 39) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. 

2. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF Doc. 25) is DENIED in part and

GRANTED in part. 

3. Plaintiff’s Fourteenth Amendment claims and claims for declaratory

relief are DISMISSED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 2nd day of December 2021. 

M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-05935-MCR-HTC Document 44 Filed 12/02/21 Page 2 of 2
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2866 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Thidiazuron. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 19, 2006 

Mr. BURR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Thidiazuron. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. THIDIAZURON. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.10.81 N-Phenyl-N-(1,2,3- 

thiadiazol-5-yl)urea 

(Thidiazuron) CAS No. 

51707–55–2), whether or 

not mixed with application 

adjuvants (provided for in 

subheading 2934.99.15 or 

3808.30.15) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•S 2866 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
52.232-24 Prohibition of Assignment of Claims.       As prescribed in 32.806(b), insert the following clause:          Prohibition of Assignment of Claims (May 2014)          The assignment of claims under the Assignment of Claims Act of 1940 "(31 U.S.C.3727, 41 U.S.C.6305)" is prohibited for this contract.          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.232 [Reserved]
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 11 Filed 10/26/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 11 Filed 10/26/2006 Page 2 of 2
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

IPF AMERICA, INC., )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv616-MHT

) (WO) 

EISENMANN CORPORATION and )

HYUNDAI MOTOR MANUFACTURING )

OF ALABAMA, L.L.C., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

The allegations of the notice of removal are

insufficient to invoke this court's removal jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1332 (diversity of citizenship) 1441

(removal).

Although § 1441 provides for removal based upon

diversity of citizenship, subsection (b) of § 1441

precludes removal where one or more of the defendants is

a citizen of the State wherein the action is brought.

Subsection (b) specifically provides that any action other

than one based on federal-question jurisdiction "shall be

removable only if none of the parties in interest properly

Case 2:06-cv-00616-MHT-SRW Document 12 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 1 of 3
2

joined and served as defendants is a citizen of the State

in which such action is brought." Because it appears that

defendant Hyundai Motor Manufacturing of Alabama, L.L.C.

is a citizen of Alabama and because this lawsuit was

initiated in an Alabama court, subsection (b) precludes

removal to this federal court unless said defendant is an

improper party.

The court, however, agrees with plaintiff IPF America,

Inc. that Hyundai Motor Manufacturing of Alabama, L.L.C.

is not a nominal defendant and thus there has been neither

fraudulent joinder, Coker v. Amoco Oil Co., 709 F.2d 1433,

1440 (11th Cir. 1983); Cabalceta v. Standard Fruit Co.,

883 F.2d 1553, 1561 (11th Cir. 1989), nor fraudulent

misjoinder, Tapscott v. MS Dealer Service Corp., 77 F.3d

1353, 1360 (11th Cir. 1996).

Accordingly, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of

the court that plaintiff IPF America, Inc.’s motion to

remand (Doc. no. 3) is granted and that, pursuant to 28

U.S.C.A. § 1447(c), this cause is remanded to the Circuit

Court of Montgomery County, Alabama.

Case 2:06-cv-00616-MHT-SRW Document 12 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 2 of 3
The petition to transfer lien (doc. no. 6) is left

for resolution by the state court after remand.

The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to take appropriate

steps to effect the remand.

DONE, this the 18th day of August, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00616-MHT-SRW Document 12 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 3 of 3