alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2015259DE.01004001.xml

| 6.10.2015 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 259/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2015

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 259/40

---

Berichtigung der Delegierten Verordnung (EU) Nr. 807/2014 der Kommission vom 11. März 2014 zur Ergänzung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1305/2013 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates über die Förderung der ländlichen Entwicklung durch den Europäischen Landwirtschaftsfonds für die Entwicklung des ländlichen Raums (ELER) und zur Einführung von Übergangsvorschriften

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 227 vom 31. Juli 2014
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 227 vom 31. Juli 2014

Auf Seite 9, Artikel 11 Absatz 2 Buchstabe a:

anstatt:

„im Entwicklungsprogramm für den ländlichen Raum festgelegt wird, in welchem Kilometerumkreis um den Betrieb, aus dem das Erzeugnis stammt, die Verarbeitung und der Verkauf an den Endverbraucher stattfinden müssen oder“

muss es heißen:

„im Entwicklungsprogramm für den ländlichen Raum festgelegt wird, in welchem Kilometerumkreis um den landwirtschaftlichen Betrieb, aus dem das Erzeugnis stammt, die Verarbeitung und der Verkauf an den Endverbraucher stattfinden müssen oder“.

---
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Authority:

7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 810.303 Basis of determination.

Each determination of conspicuous admixture, ergot, sclerotinia, stones, damaged kernels, heat-damaged kernels, distinctly green kernels, and inconspicuous admixture is made on the basis of the sample when free from dockage. Other determinations not specifically provided for under the general provisions are made on the basis of the sample as a whole, except the determination of odor is made on either the basis of the sample as a whole or the sample when free from dockage. The content of glucosinolates and erucic acid is determined on the basis of the sample according to procedures prescribed in FGIS instructions.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2925 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2925

 To suspend temporarily the duty on naphthalen-1-yl methylaminoformate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 23, 2006

  Mr. Talent introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on naphthalen-1-yl methylaminoformate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NAPHTHALEN-1-YL METHYLAMINOFORMATE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.29.24        Naphthalen-1-yl         Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           methylaminoformate                                                31/2009          ''
                           (CAS No. 63-25-2)                                                                   .
                           (provided for in
                           subheading
                           2924.29.47)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Case 3:06-cv-00641-WKW-TFM Document 1 Filed 07/19/2006 Page 1 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00641-WKW-TFM Document 1 Filed 07/19/2006 Page 2 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00641-WKW-TFM Document 1 Filed 07/19/2006 Page 3 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00641-WKW-TFM Document 1 Filed 07/19/2006 Page 4 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00641-WKW-TFM Document 1 Filed 07/19/2006 Page 5 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00641-WKW-TFM Document 1 Filed 07/19/2006 Page 6 of 6
52.249 [Reserved]

52.249-1 Termination for Convenience of the Government (Fixed-Price) (Short Form).

52.249-2 Termination for Convenience of the Government (Fixed-Price).

52.249-3 Termination for Convenience of the Government (Dismantling, Demolition,

or Removal of Improvements).

52.249-4 Termination for Convenience of the Government (Services) (Short Form).

52.249-5 Termination for Convenience of the Government (Educational and Other

Nonprofit Institutions).

52.249-6 Termination (Cost-Reimbursement).

52.249-7 Termination (Fixed-Price Architect-Engineer).

52.249-8 Default (Fixed-Price Supply and Service).

52.249-9 Default (Fixed-Price Research and Development).

52.249-10 Default (Fixed-Price Construction).

52.249-11 [Reserved]

52.249-12 Termination (Personal Services).

52.249-13 [Reserved]

52.249-14 Excusable Delays.

Parent topic: Subpart 52.2 - Text of Provisions and Clauses
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-60334

ROGER REEVES Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SANDERSON PLUMBING PRODUCTS, INC. Defendant-Appellant,

- - - - - - - - - - Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

(96CV197-S-D)

- - - - - - - - - - September 13, 2000

ON REMAND FROM THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

In this age discrimination suit, pursuant to the Age
Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, PlaintiffAppellant Roger Reeves brought suit against Defendant-Appellant
Sanderson Plumbing Produc ts, Inc. (“Sanderson”) alleging that he

was ter minated because of his age. The district court awarded

Reeves $28,490.80 in front pay, r epresenting two years’ lost1 See Shattuck v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc., 49 F.3d 1106, 1110

(5 th Cir. 1995); Hadley v. VAM , 44 F.3d 372, 375 (5 th . Cir. 1995).

2 Walther v. Lone Star Gas Company , 952 F.2d 119, 127 (5 th

. Cir. 1992) (emphasis added).
2 income, and $35,000 in liquidated damages, as determined by the jury.

We reversed the district court’s denial of Sanderson’s motion for judgment as a matter of law. The Supreme Court of the United
States then reversed our decision and remanded the case to us for
further proceedings not inconsistent with their decision. By motion, Sanderson has asked us to address on remand the propriety
of the district court’s award of front pay, an issue not addressed in our earlier decision. We grant that motion and proceed to address the question of front pay.
The standard of review here is abuse of discretion. 1
“[A] substantial liquidated damages award may indicate that an
add itional award of front pay is inappropriate or excessive.” 2
Sanderson argues that the district court sh ould not have granted
front pay here as the liquidated damages are greater than two
years’ lost income and thus their award would be punitive in
effect. Even though district courts m ay , in their discretion,
refuse to award front pay when awarding substantial liquidated damages, this does not mean that they m ust refuse to do so. We

cannot say that the district court abused its discretion in awarding front pay in addition to liquidated damages.3

We therefore affirm the district court’s original judgment, as instructed by the Supreme Court, including the award of front pay,
and reman d this case to the district court for reentry of its original judgment.
AFFIRMED and REMANDED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Overseas Private Investment Corporation

## Cancellation of December 9, 2010 Board Meeting

                    OPIC's Sunshine Act notice of its Board meeting was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     (Volume 75, Number 210, Page 67145) on November 1, 2010. There being no business to bring before the Board, the meeting has been cancelled.                

# CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION:

                         Information on the hearing cancellation may be obtained from Connie M. Downs at (202) 336-8438, via facsimile at (202) 218-0136, or via e-mail at                         *Connie.Downs@opic.gov.*

Dated: December 3, 2010.

Connie M. Downs,

OPIC Corporate Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-30915 Filed 12-3-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 3210-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3138 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3138

  To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain entries 
  relating to canned pineapple fruit entered between July 1, 1996 and 
                             June 30, 1997.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

 Mr. Chambliss introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain entries 
  relating to canned pineapple fruit entered between July 1, 1996 and 
                             June 30, 1997.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CANNED PINEAPPLE FRUIT ENTERED BETWEEN JULY 1, 1996 AND JUNE 
              30, 1997.

    (a) Reliquidation of Entries.--
            (1) In general.--Notwithstanding section 514 and 520 of the 
        Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514 and 1520) or any other 
        provision of law, the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection 
        shall, not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of 
        this Act, liquidate or reliquidate each of the entries listed 
        in subsection (b) at the rate of 5.41 percent.
            (2) Payment of amounts owed.--Any amount owed by the United 
        States pursuant to the liquidation or reliquidation of an entry 
        under paragraph (1) shall be paid not later than 90 days after 
        the date of such liquidation or reliquidation.
    (b) Affected Entries.--The entries referred to in subsection (a) 
are as follows:

 
 
 
Entry number                             Date of entry
  916-0766499-1........................  01/04/97
  916-0766503-0........................  12/31/96
  916-0766506-3........................  12/31/96
  916-0766510-5........................  12/31/96
  916-0766616-0........................  01/08/97
  916-0766617-8........................  01/08/97
  916-0769260-4........................  06/24/97
  916-0769261-2........................  06/24/97

                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

§ 868.211 Grade designation and other certificate information. ( a ) *Rough rice.* The grade designation for all classes of Rough rice shall be included on the certificate grade-line in the following order: ( 1 ) The letters “U.S.;”
( 2 ) The number of the grade or the words “Sample grade,” as warranted;
( 3 ) The words “or better,” when applicable and requested by the applicant prior to inspection; (Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0580-0013)
( 4 ) The class;
( 5 ) Each applicable special grade (see § 868.213); and
( 6 ) A statement of the milling yield.
( b ) *Mixed rough rice information.* For the class Mixed Rough rice, the following information shall be included in the Results section of the certificate in the following order: ( 1 ) The percentage of whole kernels of each type in the order of predominance;
( 2 ) The percentage of large broken kernels of each type in the order of predominance;
( 3 ) The percentage of material removed by the No. 6 sieve or the No. 6 sizing plate; and
( 4 ) The percentage of seeds, when applicable.
( c ) *Large broken kernels.* Large broken kernels, other than long grain, in Mixed Rough rice shall be certified as “medium or short grain.”
[74 FR 55442, Oct. 28, 2009]
§ 789.2 Priorities and allocations authority. ( a ) Section 201 of Executive Order 13603 (3 CFR, 2012 Comp., p. 225) delegates the President's authority under section 101 of the Defense Production Act to require acceptance and priority performance of contracts and orders (other than contracts of employment) to promote the national defense over performance of any other contracts or orders, and to allocate materials, services, and facilities as deemed necessary or appropriate to promote the national defense to the following agencies. Essentially, this allows the following agencies to place priority on the performance of contracts for items and materials under their jurisdiction as required for national defense initiatives including emergency preparedness activities: ( 1 ) The Secretary of Agriculture with respect to food resources, food resource facilities, livestock resources, veterinary resources, plant health resources, and the domestic distribution of farm equipment and commercial fertilizer;
( 2 ) The Secretary of Energy with respect to all forms of energy;
( 3 ) The Secretary of Health and Human Services with respect to health resources;
( 4 ) The Secretary of Transportation with respect to all forms of civil transportation;
( 5 ) The Secretary of Defense with respect to water resources; and
( 6 ) The Secretary of Commerce with respect to all other materials, services, and facilities, including construction materials.
( b ) Section 202 of Executive Order 13603 specifies that the priorities and allocations authority may be used only to support programs that have been determined in writing as necessary or appropriate to promote the national defense by: ( 1 ) The Secretary of Defense with respect to military production and construction, military assistance to foreign nations, military use of civil transportation, stockpiles managed by the Department of Defense, space, and directly related activities;
( 2 ) The Secretary of Energy with respect to energy production and construction, distribution and use, and directly related activities; or
( 3 ) The Secretary of Homeland Security with respect to all other national defense programs, including civil defense and continuity of Government.
5149.7003 Notification of anticipated contract terminations or reductions.    (b)(i)  The requirements in DFARS 249.7003 apply for terminations or substantial reductions under major defense programs, notwithstanding the separate congressional notification required in DFARS 249.7001 and AFARS 5149.7001.       (ii)  Contracting officers shall send the Secretary of Labor notice required in DFARS 249.7003 to ODASA(P).  ODASA(P) will be responsible for coordinating the notification to the Secretary of Labor.       (iii)  The contracting officer shall send termination notifications in the format in DFARS PGI 249.7001.  Send the unclassified notices through the SCO directly to the address at 5101.290(b)(2)(ii)(C).  Contracting officers and SCOs shall ensure the Secretary of Labor notice arrives at ODASA(P) with sufficient time for ODASA(P) to process and send the notice to the Secretary of Labor.       (iv)  If both DFARS 249.7001 and 249.7003 apply, the timing requirements of 249.7003 may necessitate release of the 249.7003(b)(2) notification before the 249.7001 notification.  In such cases, the contracting officer shall provide the DFARS 249.7003(b)(2) notices within the required timeframe, but shall not provide the contractor with other information on the anticipated termination until the requirements at DFARS 249.7001 and 5149.7001 have been satisfied. **Parent topic:** Subpart 5149.70 - Special Termination Requirements
Exhibit 21.1

List of Subsidiaries



|                                            |  |                                    
|------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------
|Name of Entity                              |  | State of Incorporation/Organization
|                                            | 
|Steer Intermediate, Inc.                    |  | Delaware                           
|                                            | 
|Walco Holdings, Inc.                        |  | Delaware                           
|                                            | 
|Walco Intermediate, Inc.                    |  | Delaware                           
|                                            | 
|Walco International, Inc.                   |  | Delaware                           
|                                            | 
|Walco do Brasil Produtos Veterinarios Ltda. |  | Brazil                             
|                                            | 
|Walco Texas Animal Health, LLC              |  | Texas                              
|                                            | 
|Walco Mexico, S.A. De C.V.                  |  | Mexico                             
|                                            | 
|Hawaii Mega-Cor., Inc.                      |  | Hawaii                             
|                                            | 
|American Livestock and Pet Supply, Inc.     |  | Delaware                           
|                                            | 
|Western Veterinary Supply, Ltd.             |  | Canada                             
|                                            | 
|Province Livestock Supply, Ltd.             |  | Canada                             
|                                            | 
|Veterinarians Outlet Incorporated          |  | California                         
|                                            | 
|Walco Canada Animal Health Ltd.             |  | Canada                             
|                                            | 
|Cattlemans Supply, Inc.                    |  | Arizona
# L_2014192EN.01005201.xml

| 1.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 192/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 192/52

---

EUROPEAN COUNCIL DECISION

of 27 June 2014

proposing to the European Parliament a candidate for President of the European Commission

(2014/414/EU)

THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 17(7) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 17(7) of the Treaty on European Union provides that, taking into account the elections to the European Parliament and after having held the appropriate consultations, the European Council proposes to the European Parliament a candidate for President of the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 17(7) of the Treaty on European Union provides that, taking into account the elections to the European Parliament and after having held the appropriate consultations, the European Council proposes to the European Parliament a candidate for President of the European Commission.

| (2) | The elections to the European Parliament were held between 22 and 25 May 2014, in accordance with Council Decision 2013/299/EU, Euratom (1). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The elections to the European Parliament were held between 22 and 25 May 2014, in accordance with Council Decision 2013/299/EU, Euratom (1).

| (3) | In accordance with Declaration No 11 annexed to the Final Act of the Intergovernmental Conference which adopted the Treaty of Lisbon, representatives of the European Parliament and of the European Council conducted the necessary consultations. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In accordance with Declaration No 11 annexed to the Final Act of the Intergovernmental Conference which adopted the Treaty of Lisbon, representatives of the European Parliament and of the European Council conducted the necessary consultations.

| (4) | Therefore a candidate should be proposed to the European Parliament for President of the European Commission, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Therefore a candidate should be proposed to the European Parliament for President of the European Commission,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Jean-Claude JUNCKER is hereby proposed to the European Parliament as candidate for President of the European Commission.

Article 2

This Decision shall be forwarded to the European Parliament.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 27 June 2014.

For the European Council

The President

H. VAN ROMPUY

---

(1)  Council Decision 2013/299/EU, Euratom of 14 June 2013 fixing the period for the eighth election of representatives to the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage (OJ L 169, 21.6.2013, p. 69).

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CHAIRPERSON
NORTHPORT NETWORK SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED 
FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED 
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I am the CEO of Northport Network Systems, Inc., a Washington corporation (the Company). I am delivering this certificate in connection with the Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (Form 10-K). Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: April 14, 2011 BY:/s/ Yan ZhaoYan ZhaoChief Executive Officer