alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
252.209-7008 Notice of Prohibition Relating

to Organizational Conflict of Interest—Major

Defense Acquisition Program.

As prescribed in 209.571-8 (a), use the following provision:

NOTICE OF PROHIBITION RELATING TO ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST—MAJOR

DEFENSE ACQUISITION PROGRAM (DEC 2010)

(a) Definitions. “Major subcontractor” is defined in the clause at 252.209-7009 , Organizational

Conflict of Interest—Major Defense Acquisition Program.

(b) This solicitation is for the performance of systems engineering and technical assistance for a

major defense acquisition program or a pre-major defense acquisition program.

(c) Prohibition. As required by paragraph (b)(3) of section 207 of the Weapons System Acquisition

Reform Act of 2009 (Pub. L. 111-23), if awarded the contract, the contractor or any affiliate of the

contractor is prohibited from participating as a prime contractor or a major subcontractor in the

development or production of a weapon system under the major defense acquisition program or premajor defense acquisition program, unless the offeror submits, and the Government approves, an

Organizational Conflict of Interest Mitigation Plan.

(d) Request for an exception. If the offeror requests an exception to the prohibition of paragraph (c)

of this provision, then the offeror shall submit an Organizational Conflict of Interest Mitigation Plan

with its offer for evaluation.

(e) Incorporation of Organizational Conflict of Interest Mitigation Plan in contract. If the apparently

successful offeror submitted an acceptable Organizational Conflict of Interest Mitigation Plan, and

the head of the contracting activity determines that DoD needs the domain experience and expertise

of the highly qualified, apparently successful offeror in accordance with FAR 209.571-7(c), then the

Contracting Officer will incorporate the Organizational Conflict of Interest Mitigation Plan into the

resultant contract, and paragraph (d) of the clause at 252.209-7009 will become applicable.

(End of provision)

Parent topic: 252.209 RESERVED
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| BOND LABORATORIES, INC.  |                                                          |   |   |
|-------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                          |                                                          |   |   |   |
|                          |                                                          |   |   |   |
| By                            | /s/                  Scott Landow                             |   |   |  |
|                          | Scott                  Landow                                 |   |   |  |
|                          | Chairman, CEO                                                 |   |   |   |
|                          | (Sole                    executive officer of the registrant) |   |   |   |
|                          | March                    28, 2008                             |   |   |   |

----
UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y REGIO N 5 7 7 WES TJACKSO N BOULEVAR D CHICAGO , I L 60604-359 0 

# F E B 1 1 201 3 REPL YT O TH E ATTENTIO N OF : Kristh y St . Hilair e Interdisciplinar y Environmenta l Clini c Washingto n Universit y Schoo l o f La w On e Brooking s Driv e - C B 112 0 St . Louis , Missour i 6313 0 Dea r Ms . St . Hilaire : Th e U.S . Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y ha s reviewe dthe February 7 , 201 3 reques t b y th e Interdisciplinar y Environmenta l Clini c a t Washingto n Universit y i n St . Louis , o n behal f o f America n Botto mConservancy , fo r an extensio n o f

the publi c commen t

perio do n th e draf

t significan t

modificatio n to Titl e V Permi t No . V-IL-1716300103-08-0 1 (draf t permit ) fo r

Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C . (Veolia) . Th e publi c comment perio do n th e draf

t permi t i s currentl y schedule dt o en do n Marc h15 , 2013 . E P Ai s grantin g you r

reques t to exten dth e publi c comment period . Th e publi c commen t perio d wil l no w clos e a

tmidnighto

n Apri l 1, 2013. Al l relevan t comment s receive db y EP Ao n o r befor e Apri l 1 , 201 3 wil l b e considere db y EP Ai n makin g afina l decisio n i n thi s matter . Pleas e contac t

m e o r Davi dOgulei , o f

m y staff, a

t (312 ) 353-0987 , wit hany questions . Sincerely ,

Ai r Permit s Sectio n

cc : Kath y Andria , America n Botto mConservanc y

Recycled/Recyclabl e • Printe d wit h Vegetabl e Oi l Base d Ink s o n 100 % Recycle d Pape r(100 % Post-Consumer )
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 1-4 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 1-4 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 1-4 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00630-ID-TFM Document 1-4 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 4 of 4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

v. CASE NO. 1:97-cr-00008-MP-GRJ

MARAM R. CAMPBELL, 

Defendant.

_____________________________/ 

O R D E R

Pursuant to N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 72.3, and by the consent of Defendant, 

this matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge for the taking of a guilty 

plea. ECF No. 27. This cause now comes on for consideration upon the 

Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation dated August 3, 2016. ECF 

No. 33. Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation, to which there has 

been no timely objections, and subject to this Court’s consideration of the plea 

agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11, 

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, ECF No. 33, is

accepted and incorporated herein by reference.

2. The Court accepts the guilty plea of defendant, Maram R. Campbell, withholds

formal adjudication at this time, and directs the clerk to set sentencing by separate

notice.

SO ORDERED on August 8, 2016. 

s/Mark E. Walker 

United States District Judge

Case 1:97-cr-00008-MW-GRJ Document 36 Filed 08/08/16 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT 32.2** **Certification    of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of    the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**     I, Frederic T. Boyer, Chief Financial Officer of Qualstar    Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to    Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,    18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:     (1) the Quarterly Report on    Form 10-Q    of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended December 31,    2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities    Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company. /s/  FREDERIC    T. BOYER    Frederic T. Boyer    Chief Financial Officer     Dated: February 13, 2006
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Hector Frazier, Appellant.

Submitted October 15, 2007;

decided October 18, 2007

Reported below, 35 AD3d 759.

*947Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Lynn W.L. Fa-hey, Esq., Appellate Advocates, 2 Rector Street, 10th Floor, New York, NY 10006 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
#### VAN ALST, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

July 24, 1906.)

Action by Eliza Van AIst, as executrix, etc., against the city of New York.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
#### Jessie Sanders et al., Respondents, v Eddie Elie et al., Defendants, and Warraich Shahid, Appellant.

[816 NYS2d 509]

*774In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Warraich Shahid appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Douglass, J.), dated July 7, 2004, which denied his motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against him for lack of personal jurisdiction, and granted the plaintiffs’ cross motion for leave to serve process upon him via delivery to Country-Wide Insurance Company.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, with costs, the motion is granted, the cross motion is denied, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellant, and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.

The Supreme Court should have granted the appellant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction because the plaintiffs failed to meet the “due diligence” requirement for so-called “nail and mail” service under CPLR 308 (4). Moreover, there is no indication that the process server made any attempt to locate the appellant’s business address or to effectuate personal service thereat *(see Earle v Valente,*302 AD2d 353 [2003]; *Annis v Long,*298 AD2d 340 [2002]).

The Supreme Court should have denied the plaintiffs’ cross motion for relief pursuant to CPLR 308 (5) because they failed to demonstrate that service upon the appellant by any of the ordinary methods was impracticable *(see Coffey v Russo,*231 AD2d 546, 547 [1996]; *Tetro v Tizov,*184 AD2d 633, 635 [1992]). Schmidt, J.P., Crane, Krausman, Skelos and Lunn, JJ., concur.
52.227-5 Waiver of Indemnity.       As prescribed in 27.201-2(e), insert the following clause:          Waiver of Indemnity (Apr 1984)          Any provision or clause of this contract to the contrary notwithstanding, the Government hereby authorizes and consents to the use and manufacture, solely in performing this contract, of any invention covered by the United States patents identified below and waives indemnification by the Contractor with respect to such patents:          __________________________________________________ [*Contracting Officer identify the patents by number or by other means if more appropriate*.]          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.227 [Reserved]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Arthur Bryant, Appellant.

Submitted May 29, 2007;

decided July 2, 2007

Reported below, 30 AD3d 1131.

Motion to amend remittitur denied *[see*8 NY3d 530].
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

) CRIMINAL ACTION NO.

 v. )

) 2:06cr169-WKW 

JAMES CALVIN TALLEY )

O R D E R

The defendant by consent has appeared before a United States Magistrate Judge and has

entered a plea of guilty. The Magistrate Judge accepted the plea of guilty and has adjudicated the

defendant guilty. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. Sentencing of the defendant is hereby set on January 25, 2008, at 1:30 p.m., Courtroom

2-E, of the Frank M. Johnson, Jr. United States Courthouse Complex, One Church Street,

Montgomery, Alabama.

2. In accordance with Rule 32(f)(1), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, counsel for the

defendant and the Government shall communicate in writing to the probation officer, and to each

other, any objections they have as to any material information, sentencing classifications, sentencing

guideline ranges, and policy statements contained in or omitted from the presentence report. The

probation officer will notify parties of the objection deadline and will schedule a conference to

discuss and resolve, if possible, any factual and legal issues contained in the presentence report.

3. Any motion for downward departure shall be filed on or before the conference date with

the probation officer, unless based on unknown and unforeseen circumstances arising after that date,

in which case the motion must be filed promptly upon discovery of such circumstances.

Nothing contained in this Order shall be construed as impairing the rights of any party as

established in the Constitution or laws of the United States.

DONE this 30th day of October, 2007.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 447 Filed 10/30/2007 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
McCombs Realty Partners, Ltd. 1998 First Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in 
its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000759198
<NAME> MCCOMBS REALTY PARTNERS, LTD.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998   
<CASH>                                             414
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                           5,908
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,306)   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,495   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                          5,713     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0     
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,382)    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,495    
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   343    
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   363    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 121    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (20)     
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.15)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
#### § 760.1002 Definitions.

The following definitions apply to the programs in subpart L and M of this part. The definitions in parts 718 and 1400 of this title also apply, except where they conflict with the definitions in this section.

*Commercial use* means a use performed as part of the operation of a business activity engaged in as a means of livelihood for profit by the eligible producer.

*Farming operation* means a business enterprise engaged in producing agricultural products.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

COURTNEY O. GATHERS,

Petitioner,

v. Case No.: 4:20cv587-MW/EMT

SECRETARY, FLORIDA

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

___________________________/ 

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and 

Recommendation. ECF No. 19. This Court previously vacated its order adopting the 

Report and Recommendation after Petitioner sought a 60-day extension of time to 

file objections, see ECF Nos. 24 and 25. Petitioner sought a second extension on 

May 31, 2022, ECF No. 32, which this Court granted. Objections were due on or 

before June 27, 2022; however, as of the date of this Order, Petitioner has filed no 

Case 4:20-cv-00587-MW-ZCB Document 34 Filed 07/05/22 Page 1 of 2
2

objections. Accordingly, upon consideration, no objections having been filed by the 

parties,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation, ECF No. 19, is accepted and adopted as 

this Court’s opinion. Respondent’s motion to dismiss, ECF No. 10, is GRANTED. 

The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “Petitioner’s § 2254 petition for writ of 

habeas corpus, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED with prejudice as untimely.” The 

certificate of appealability is DENIED. The Clerk shall close the file.

SO ORDERED on July 5, 2022.

s/Mark E. Walker 

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00587-MW-ZCB Document 34 Filed 07/05/22 Page 2 of 2
****REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON AUTOMATION AND TECHNOLOGY'S****
****SUBCOMMITTEE ON POLICY AND PROGRAMS****
****CONCERNING STANDARD ELECTRONIC CITATIONS****
The Committee on Automation and Technology's Subcommittee on Policy andPrograms held a public hearing on April 3, 1997, on the application tothe federal judiciary of a standard, format-neutral citation system. TheSubcommittee has completed its report, which was endorsed by the Committeeon Automation and Technology. The matter will be considered by the JudicialConference at its September 1997 session.
252.228-7003 Capture and Detention.       As prescribed in                  228.371              (c), use the following clause:          CAPTURE AND DETENTION (DEC 1991)          (a)  As used in this clause—          (1)  “Captured person” means any employee of the Contractor who is—          (i)  Assigned to duty outside the United States for the performance of this contract; and          (ii)  Found to be missing from his or her place of employment under circumstances that make it appear probable that the absence is due to the action of the force of any power not allied with the United States in a common military effort; or          (iii)  Known to have been taken prisoner, hostage, or otherwise detained by the force of such power, whether or not actually engaged in employment at the time of capture; provided, that at the time of capture or detention, the person was either—          (A)  Engaged in activity directly arising out of and in the course of employment under this contract; or          (B)  Captured in an area where required to be only in order to perform this contract.          (2)  A “period of detention” begins with the day of capture and continues until the captured person is returned to the place of employment, the United States, or is able to be returned to the jurisdiction of the United States, or until the person's death is established or legally presumed to have occurred by evidence satisfactory to the Contracting Officer, whichever occurs first.          (3)  “United States” comprises geographically the 50 states and the District of Columbia.          (4)  “War Hazards Compensation Act” refers to the statute compiled in Chapter 12 of Title 42, U.S. Code (sections 1701-1717), as amended.          (b)  If pursuant to an agreement entered into prior to capture, the Contractor is obligated to pay and has paid detention benefits to a captured person, or the person's dependents, the Government will reimburse the Contractor up to an amount equal to the lesser of—          (1)  Total wage or salary being paid at the time of capture due from the Contractor to the captured person for the period of detention; or          (2)  That amount which would have been payable if the detention had occurred under circumstances covered by the War Hazards Compensation Act.          (c)  The period of detention shall not be considered as time spent in contract performance, and the Government shall not be obligated to make payment for that time except as provided in this clause.          (d)  The obligation of the Government shall apply to the entire period of detention, except that it is subject to the availability of funds from which payment can be made.  The rights and obligations of the parties under this clause shall survive prior expiration, completion, or termination of this contract.          (e)	The Contractor shall not be reimbursed under this clause for payments made if the employees were entitled to compensation for capture and detention under the War Hazards Compensation Act, as amended.          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 252.228 RESERVED
wtw-ex1043_703.htm



 

EXHIBIT 10.43

February 8, 2018

Stacey Mowbray

[REDACTED]

[REDACTED]

Dear Stacey, 

This letter shall serve as the first addendum (“First Addendum”) to your employment agreement, dated May 8, 2017 (“Employment Agreement”).  All defined terms in the Employment Agreement shall have the same meaning, force and effect as used in this First Addendum.

Your Employment Agreement is hereby supplemented and/or modified as follows:


	
 
	
1.
	
Commencing on the first pay date following your execution of this First Addendum (February 15, 2018) and continuing through all payroll periods in 2018 with pay dates in the current calendar year (the “2018 Conversion Period”), a portion of your Base Salary will be paid in US dollars (“USD”) such that you will receive a net total payment of USD $5,500 in each such pay period during the 2018 Conversion Period.  These payments shall be converted from Canadian dollars (“CAD”) to USD based on the exchange rates in effect as of December 29, 2017.  Accordingly, based on such exchange rates in effect as of December 29, 2017, the Company will set aside a net amount of CAD $6,914.76 of your Base Salary in each pay period during the 2018 Conversion Period to be converted into, and paid to you in, USD during each such pay period.  The remainder of your Base Salary payments during the 2018 Conversion Period shall be paid in CAD.  It is agreed and understood that the payments being provided to you in USD during the 2018 Conversion Period are to be taken as a deduction from, and not an addition to, your Base Salary.  WWCL shall pay, and make the appropriate withholdings and deductions from, all of your Base Salary payments, including the ones being paid in USD, during the 2018 Conversion Period.  Unless the parties agree otherwise, commencing on January 1, 2019, your Base Salary payments shall be paid entirely in CAD.





	
 
	
2.
	
You shall continue to report to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Mindy Grossman.





	
 
	
3.
	
You shall be eligible for life insurance and AD&D coverage in accordance with the terms and conditions of WWCL’s policies and the official plan documents, as amended from time to time, at two times your Base Salary, up to a maximum of CAD $1,000,000.  You agree to execute any and all documents required to effectuate this change in coverage as a condition for the effectiveness of this First Addendum. 





	
 
	
4.
	
All other terms and conditions in your Employment Agreement which have not been modified by this First Addendum shall remain in full force and effect.  To the extent there are any conflicts between anything stated in this First Addendum and your Employment Agreement, the terms of this First Addendum shall control.




We thank you for all of your contributions, and look forward to continuing to work with you.

Yours Sincerely,

/s/ Kimberly Samon

Kimberly Samon

Chief Human Resources Officer

Agreed to by: 

 

 


	
/s/ Stacey Mowbray
	
 
	
February 26, 2018

	
Stacey Mowbray
	
 
	
Date
###### Editorial Note on Part 4290

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 4290 appear at 85 FR 16522, Mar. 24, 2020.

#### § 4290.410 Changes in Control of RBIC (through change in ownership or otherwise).

You must obtain the Agency's prior written approval for any proposed transaction or event that results in Control by any Person(s) not previously approved by the Agency.