alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2015243EN.01001401.xml

| 18.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 243/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 243/14

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) No 654/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 concerning the exercise of the Union's rights for the application and enforcement of international trade rules and amending Council Regulation (EC) No 3286/94 laying down Community procedures in the field of the common commercial policy in order to ensure the exercise of the Community's rights under international trade rules, in particular those established under the auspices of the World Trade Organization

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 189 of 27 June 2014
  )

On page 57, Article 11:

for:

‘In Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 3286/94, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following:

‘3.   Where the Union, having acted in accordance with ...’,

read:

‘In Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 3286/94, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following:

‘2.   Where the Union, having acted in accordance with ...’.

---
1 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. -1- United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 19, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________________ No. 03-10766 SUMMARY CALENDAR

_________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. DAVID VALDEZ, Defendant - Appellant.

______________________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Texas (2:02-CR-00074-ALL)

______________________________________________________________________________ Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. REYNALDO G. GARZA, Circuit Judge: 1 We review David Valdez’s conviction for conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute methamphetamine. Valdez argues that evidence seized during the search of his home and statements made thereafter should be suppressed because the officers’ failure to knock and announce their presence prior to entering his home was not justified by exigent circumstances.-2-

We hold that the district court did not err in determining that officers in this case had a reasonable suspicion that knocking and announcing would likely result in violence or the destruction of evidence, which justified their decision based upon the following articulated facts: (1) Valdez’s home was occupied by Delissa and Christopher Valdez, who were both on felony probation, under federal indictment for federal drug offenses, and previously found to be in possession of a firearm during a search of their residence three weeks prior to the execution of the warrant at issue; (2) Delissa Valdez also had a prior arrest for possession of a firearm; (3) surveillance of David Valdez’s home the night before the search at issue revealed behavior indicative of drug trafficking; (4) a confidential informant indicated the man in control of the premises was in possession of a large amount of methamphetamine; and (5) methamphetamine users are typically more violent than users of other illegal drugs. See Richards v. Wisconsin, 520 U.S. 385, 387 (1997); United States v. Banks , 124 S.Ct. 521, 525 (2003). For the foregoing reasons, we uphold the conviction.
252.232-7002 Progress Payments for Foreign Military Sales Acquisitions.       As prescribed in                 232.502-4             -70(a), use the following clause:          PROGRESS PAYMENTS FOR FOREIGN MILITARY SALES ACQUISITIONS (MAY 2023)          If this contract includes foreign military sales (FMS) requirements, the Contractor shall—          (a) Submit a separate progress payment requests for the FMS and U.S. line items in the contract;          (b) Submit a supporting schedule showing the amount of each request distributed to each country's requirements; and          (c)  Identify in each progress payment request the contract requirements to which it applies (i.e., FMS or U.S.);          (d) Calculate each request on the basis of the prices, costs (including costs to complete), subcontract financing, and progress payment liquidations of the contract requirements to which it applies; and          (e) Distribute costs among the countries in a manner acceptable to the Administrative Contracting Officer.          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 252.232 RESERVED
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Boston Old Colony Insurance Company, Respondent, and Mary L. Martin et al., Appellants.

Order entered September 15,1969 staying arbitration unanimously reversed on the law and facts, with $30 costs and disbursements to the appellants, and the stay vacated. By active participation in the selection of the arbitrator, the respondent waived its right to stay arbitration and raise any objection to the service of the notice to arbitrate. The adjournment of the arbitration hearing at the request of the respondent without any reservation of rights constituted a waiver of any right to a stay of the proceedings and any objection to the proceedings. *(Matter of National Cash Begister Co. [Wilson],*8 N Y 2d 377; *Mid Atlantic Constr. Gorp.*v. *Guido,*30 A D 2d 232, 237; *Milton L. Ehrlich, Inc.*v. *Swiss Gonstr. Gorp.,*11 A D 2d 644.) Further, there was a request for medical information by the respondent which was furnished by the appellant. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Eager, McNally, Steuer and Tilzer, JJ.
§ 765.206 Junior liens. ( a ) *General policy.* The borrower will not give a lien on Agency security without the consent of the Agency. Failure to obtain Agency consent will be considered by the Agency when making eligibility determinations for future requests for assistance and may adversely impact such requests.
( b ) *Conditions for consent.* The Agency will consent to the terms of a junior lien if all of the following conditions are met: ( 1 ) The borrower's ability to make scheduled loan payments is not jeopardized;
( 2 ) The borrower provides the Agency a copy of the farm operating plan submitted to the junior lienholder, and the plan is consistent with the Agency operating plan;
( 3 ) The total debt against the security does not exceed the security's market value;
( 4 ) The junior lienholder agrees in writing not to foreclose the security instrument unless written notice is provided to the Agency;
( 5 ) The borrower is unable to graduate on any program except for CL; and
( 6 ) The junior lien will not otherwise adversely impact the Agency's financial interests.
[72 FR 63309, Nov. 8, 2007, as amended at 75 FR 54016, Sept. 3, 2010]
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2805 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,6-Di-tert-butylphenol. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 16, 2006 

Mr. DEMINT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,6-Di-tert-butylphenol. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2,6-DI-TERT-BUTYLPHENOL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.07.19 2,6-Di-tert-butylphenol (CAS 

No. 128–39–2) (provided for 

in subheading 2907.19.80) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 2805 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly report of eNucleus, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-QSB/A for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I John C. Paulsen, Chief
Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


     (1)  The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



 Date:  January 18, 2005                      /s/  John C. Paulsen
                                            --------------------------------
                                                 John C. Paulsen
                                                 Chief Executive Officer and
                                                 Principal Financial and
                                                 Accounting Officer
#### § 900.354 Inspection and investigation.

The Secretary of Agriculture, or his duly authorized representative, shall have the right, at any time after an application is received, to examine all books, documents, papers, records, files and facilities of the association, to verify any of the information submitted and to procure such other information as may be required to determine whether the association is qualified in accordance with its application.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

§ 800.189 Corrective actions for violations. ( a ) *Criminal prosecution.* Official personnel and warehouse samplers who commit an offense prohibited by section 13 of the Act are subject to criminal prosecution in accordance with section 14 of the Act.
( b ) *Administrative action* — ( 1 ) *Other than Service employees.* In addition to possible criminal prosecution, licensees and warehouse samplers are subject to administrative action in accordance with sections 9 and 14 of the Act.
( 2 ) *Service employees.* In addition to possible criminal prosecution, employees of the Service are subject to disciplinary action by the Service.
52.241 Utility Services Provisions and

Clauses.

52.241-1 Electric Service Territory Compliance Representation.

52.241-2 Order of Precedence-Utilities.

52.241-3 Scope and Duration of Contract.

52.241-4 Change in Class of Service.

52.241-5 Contractor’s Facilities.

52.241-6 Service Provisions.

52.241-7 Change in Rates or Terms and Conditions of Service for Regulated Services.

52.241-8 Change in Rates or Terms and Conditions of Service for Unregulated

Services.

52.241-9 Connection Charge.

52.241-10 Termination Liability.

52.241-11 Multiple Service Locations.

52.241-12 Nonrefundable, Nonrecurring Service Charge.

52.241-13 Capital Credits.

Parent topic: Subpart 52.2 - Text of Provisions and Clauses
#### MULLER, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 8, 1906.)

Action by Helen S. Muller, as administratrix, etc., of William Muller, deceased, against the city of New York and the Ocean Electric Railway Company.

No opinion. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
§ 799.3 Applicability. ( a ) Except as provided for in paragraph (b) of this section, this part applies to: ( 1 ) The development or revision of FSA rules, regulations, plans, policies, or procedures;
( 2 ) New or continuing FSA proposed actions and programs, including, on behalf of the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC), CCC programs, Farm Loan Programs, and Farm Programs; and
( 3 ) FSA legislative proposals, not including appropriations requests, developed by FSA or with significant FSA cooperation and support.
( b ) This part does not apply to FSA programs specifically exempted from environmental review by the authorizing legislation for those programs.
52.236-28 Preparation of ProposalsConstruction.

As prescribed in 36.520 , insert the following provision:

Preparation of Proposals-Construction (Oct 1997)

(a) Proposals must be (1) submitted on the forms furnished by the Government or on copies of those

forms; and (2) manually signed. The person signing a proposal must initial each erasure or change

appearing on any proposal form.

(b) The proposal form may require offerors to submit proposed prices for one or more items on

various bases, including-

(1) Lump sum price;

(2) Alternate prices;

(3) Units of construction; or

(4) Any combination of paragraphs (b)(1) through (b)(3) of this provision.

(c) If the solicitation requires submission of a proposal on all items, failure to do so may result in the

proposal being rejected without further consideration. If a proposal on all items is not required,

offerors should insert the words "no proposal" in the space provided for any item on which no price

is submitted.

(d) Alternate proposals will not be considered unless this solicitation authorizes their submission.

(End of provision)

Parent topic: 52.236 [Reserved]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3067 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3067

        To reduce temporarily the duty on NOA 446510 Technical.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

  Mr. Cornyn introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To reduce temporarily the duty on NOA 446510 Technical.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NOA 446510 TECHNICAL.

    (a) Calendar Years 2007 and 2008.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 is 
amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.12.07      4-Chloro-N-[2-[3-   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         methoxy-4-(2-                                                      31/2008
                         propynyloxy)pheny
                         l]ethyl]-a-(2-
                         propynyloxy)benze
                         neacetamide
                         (Mandipropamid)
                         (CAS No. 374726-
                         62-2) (provided
                         for in subheading
                         2924.29.47)......

    (b) Calendar Year 2009.--
            (1) In general.--Heading 9902.12.07, as added by subsection 
        (a), is amended--
                    (A) by striking ``Free'' and inserting ``1.25%''; 
                and
                    (B) by striking ``On or before 12/31/2008'' and 
                inserting ``On or before 12/31/2009''.
            (2) Effective date.--The amendments made by paragraph (1) 
        shall take effect on January 1, 2009.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION

RUTH WILLIAMS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 1:06cv637-MHT

) 

MERCK & CO., INC., a )

New Jersey Corporation, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

Counsel for plaintiff having orally informed the

court that plaintiff has no objection, it is ORDERED that

defendant’s motion to stay (doc. no. 7) is granted and

that this cause is stayed pending MDL transfer.

DONE, this the 22nd day of August, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00637-MHT-SRW Document 8 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 1 of 1
252.239-7000 Protection Against

Compromising Emanations.

As prescribed in 239.7103 (a), use the following clause:

PROTECTION AGAINST COMPROMISING EMANATIONS (OCT 2019)

(a) The Contractor shall provide or use only information technology, as specified by the Government,

that has been accredited to meet the appropriate information assurance requirements of—

(1) The National Security Agency National TEMPEST Standards (NSTISSAM TEMPEST 1-92,

Compromising Emanations Laboratory Test Requirements, Electromagnetics (U)); or

(2) Other standards specified by this contract, including the date through which the required

accreditation is current or valid for the contract.

(b) Upon request of the Contracting Officer, the Contractor shall provide documentation supporting

the accreditation.

(c) The Government may, as part of its inspection and acceptance, conduct additional tests to ensure

that information technology delivered under this contract satisfies the information assurance

standards specified. The Government may conduct additional tests—

(1) At the installation site or contractor's facility; and

(2) Notwithstanding the existence of valid accreditations of information technology prior to the

award of this contract.

(d) Unless otherwise provided in this contract under the Warranty of Supplies or Warranty of

Systems and Equipment clause, the Contractor shall correct or replace accepted information

technology found to be deficient within 1 year after proper installations.

(1) The correction or replacement shall be at no cost to the Government.

(2) Should a modification to the delivered information technology be made by the Contractor, the 1-

year period applies to the modification upon its proper installation.

(3) This paragraph (d) applies regardless of f.o.b. point or the point of acceptance of the deficient

information technology.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 252.239 RESERVED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

______________________________________________________________________________

GARY TAYLOR, 

 Petitioner / Appellant,

v.

GEORGE ANTHONY TAYLOR and

ANNE MARIE TAYLOR,

 Defendants / Appellee.

Cause No. DA-23-0554

ORDER EXTENDING DUE DATE FOR 

OPENING BRIEF 

UPON READING the unopposed Motion for an extension of the due date for the 

Opening Brief and finding good cause appearing therein.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the opening brief in the above-listed case is GRANTED 

an additional forty-five (45) days to file and must be filed by February 5, 2024.

Dated this _____ day of __________________________.

________________________

Judge / Clerk 

of the Supreme Court

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 22 2023

12/22/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0554
#### In the Matter of Joseph F. McDonald, an Attorney, Respondent. Committee on Professional Standards, Third Judicial Department, Petitioner.

Application by respondent to modify order dated May 2, 1980 to provide that respondent’s affidavit be treated as an application for suspension by reason of "physical” instead of "mental” incapacity. Application denied. Based upon respondent’s testimony at a preliminary hearing before petitioner and the statements contained in respondent’s affidavit of April 16, 1980, we concluded that respondent’s inability to function as an attorney resulted from mental or emotional incapacity or irresponsibility. Accordingly, we treated respondent’s affidavit requesting voluntary suspension from the practice of law as an application for suspension by reason of mental incapacity. We find no basis in the present application for treating such affidavit as an application for suspension by reason of physical incapacity. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Main and Casey, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32

NEWSTAR FINANCIAL, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of NewStar Financial, Inc. (the Company) for the
year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                                                  
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | NEWSTAR FINANCIAL, INC.                                          
|                     | 
|Date: March 30, 2007 |  | /S/    TIMOTHY J.
CONWAY                                         
|                     |  | Timothy J. Conway Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
|                     | 
|Date: March 30, 2007 |  | /S/    JOHN K.
BRAY                                              
|                     |  | John K. Bray Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

M IDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABA M A

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

August 8, 2006

NOTICE OF CORRECTION

From: Clerk’s Office

Case Style: Ben F. Beard v. Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. , et al.

Case Number: 2:06-cv-653-WHA

Pleading : #1 - Notice of Removal

Notice of Correction is being filed this date to advise that the referenced pleading was filed

on 7/21/2006 with improper signatures as one person is not allowed to sign another’s name.

 The corrected pdf document containing the original signatures of all counsel is attached to this

notice.

Case 2:06-cv-00653-WHA-CSC Document 10 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cv-00653-WHA-CSC Document 10-2 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00653-WHA-CSC Document 10-2 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00653-WHA-CSC Document 10-2 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 3 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00653-WHA-CSC Document 10-2 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 4 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00653-WHA-CSC Document 10-2 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 5 of 5