alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit















Exhibit 10.11


November 15, 2016


Ms. Tracy Pearson
255 Ridgewood Drive
Piperton, TN  38017




Dear Tracy,


As we discussed, this is an addendum to your offer letter dated September 16, 2016.


According to the terms of your offer, you will receive a one-time signing bonus in the gross amount of $815,000. This one-time signing bonus will be paid not later than December 31, 2016 (and will be net of applicable tax withholdings). The Company is waiving the requirement that you remain employed by the Company for two years.


To confirm our mutual understanding, please sign this addendum and return it to me by November 21, 2016.




Yours Truly, 


/s/ Elizabeth Patrick
Elizabeth Patrick
SVP, Chief HR Officer






ACCEPTED & AGREED:




/s/ Tracy L. Pearson                November 16, 2016
Tracy Pearson                        Date




1000 Abernathy Road NE, Suite 1700, Atlanta, GA 30328  |  770 391 8200  |  veritivcorp.com
Offer Letter – Salaried Exempt
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

 

RALPH BROWN, * 

 * 

 Plaintiff, * 

 * 

v. * Case Number: 2:06-CV642-MEF 

 * 

CHAMPION ENTERPRISES, INC., et al. * 

 * Unopposed 

 Defendants. * 

 

JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL

COME NOW the Plaintiff and Champion Home Builders Co., improperly named in the 

Complaint as Champion Home Builders Company, Inc., the remaining Defendant in the above 

matter, by and through their respective counsel, and state as follows: 

A settlement has been reached with respect to all aspects and with respect to all claims 

against Defendant in the above-styled matter. Therefore, counsel for Plaintiff and Defendant 

move that Champion Home Builders Co. and all claims made by Plaintiff against Champion 

Home Builders Co. be dismissed, with prejudice, costs taxed as paid. 

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the undersigned counsel pray for an 

order dismissing Champion Home Builders Co. and all claims made by Plaintiff against 

Champion Home Builders Co. from the above-referenced cause, with prejudice. 

Respectfully submitted this 29th day of August, 2008. 

/s/ Gregory S. Ritchey

Gregory S. Ritchey, Esquire {ASB-8193-H68G 

Richard S. Walker, Esquire {ASB-8719-L70R} 

Counsel for Champion Home Builders Co., improperly named in the Complaint as Champion 

Home Builders Company, Inc. 

RITCHEY & SIMPSON, PLLC 

The Mountain Brook Center 

2700 Highway 280, Suite 203 West 

Birmingham, AL 35223-2468 

Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 55 Filed 08/29/2008 Page 1 of 2
/s/ C. Lance Gould

C. Lance Gould, Esquire 

Counsel for Plaintiff 

BEASLEY, ALLEN, CROW, 

METHVIN, PORTIS & MILES, P.C. 

Post Office Box 4160 

Montgomery, AL 36103 

Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 55 Filed 08/29/2008 Page 2 of 2
EX-35 (d)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

March 12, 2007

Deutsche Alt-A Securities, Inc

RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for Deutsche Alt-A Securities Mortgage
Loan Trust, Sereis 2006-AR4

Per Section 3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of 9/1/2006,
the undersigned Officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Master Servicer), hereby
certifies the following for the 2006 calendar year or portion thereof:

(A)     a review of such party's activities during the preceding calendar year
        or portion thereof and of such party's performance under this Agreement,
        or such other applicable agreement in the case of a Servicing Function
        Participant, has been made under such officer's supervision and

(B)     to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such
        party has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement, or such
        other applicable agreement in the case of any such Servicing Function
        Participant, in all material respects throughout such year or portion
        thereof, or, if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation
        in any material respect, specifying each such failure known to such
        officer and the nature and status thereof.

Certified By:
/s/ Reid Denny
Reid Denny, Vice President

Certified By:
/s/ Gordon Johnson
Gordon Johnson, Assistant Secretary
EX-34 (g)
(logo) ERNST & YOUNG

* Ernst & Young LLP
  220 South Sixth Street, Ste. 1400
  Minneapolis, MN 55402-4509

* Phone: (612) 343-1000
  www.ey.com

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on
Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that U.S.
Bank National Association (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set
forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB
for the Corporate Trust Asset Backed Securities platform (the Platform) as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2006, except for criteria 1122 (d)(1)(i),
1122 (d)(1)(iii), 1122 (d)(2)(i) through 1122 (d)(2)(vii), 1122 (d)(3)(i)
through 1122 (d)(3)(iv), and 1122 (d)(4)(iv) through 1122 (d)(4)(xv), which the
Company has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by them
with respect to the servicing platform covered by this report. Management is
responsible for the Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining,
on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than
all of the individual asset backed transactions and securities that comprise the
Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the
Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected
transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the
servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected
transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period
covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether
errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may
have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company
during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any
other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the
Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31,
2006, for the Corporate Trust Asset Backed Securities platform is fairly stated,
in all material respects.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

February 26, 2007

A Member Practice of Ernst & Young Global
Order entered April 8, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01621-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF K.G., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-13-17435-Z

ORDER

Because this is an accelerated appeal, we GRANT court reporter Glenda E. Finkley’s 

request for additional time to file record to the extent we ORDER the reporter’s record be filed 

no later than April 20, 2015. See TEX. R. APP. P. 4.1, 28.4(b)(2), 35.3(c).

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Authority:

7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 800.147 Maintenance and retention of records on delegations, designations, contracts, and approval of scale testing organizations.

Agencies, contractors, and approved scale testing organizations shall maintain complete records of their delegation, designation, contract, or approval. These records consist of a copy of the delegation or designation documents, a copy of the current contract, or a copy of the notice of approval, respectively, and all amendments and revisions thereto. These records shall be maintained until superseded, terminated, revoked, or cancelled.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0580-0011)
---

Exhibit 99.3








CONSENT OF AUTHOR





TO:
Ur-Energy Inc.


British Columbia Securities Commission


Alberta Securities Commission


Saskatchewan Securities Commission


Manitoba Securities Commission


Ontario Securities Commission


United States Securities and Exchange Commission





AND TO:
Toronto Stock Exchange


NYSE Amex





RE:
Ur-Energy Inc. (“Ur-Energy”) - Consent under National Instrument 43-101








Reference is made to the technical report (the “Technical Report”) entitled “NI 43-101 Preliminary Assessment for the Lost Creek Project Sweetwater County, Wyoming,”(April 2008) which the undersigned has prepared for Ur-Energy.





I have reviewed and approved the summary of and extract from the Technical Report prepared to be filed with the Annual Report on Form 20-F /A (Annual Information Form) of Ur-Energy (fiscal year ended December 31, 2009) and confirm that the summary and extract fairly and accurately represents the information in the Technical Report.  I hereby consent to the written disclosure of my name, and reference to and incorporation by reference of, the Technical Report in the public filing of the Annual Report on Form 20-F /A (Annual Information Form) of Ur-Energy with the regulatory authorities referred to above.  I further consent to the incorporation by reference into Registration Statement No. 333-153098 on Form S-8 of the Technical Report.





I certify that I have reviewed the Annual Report on Form 20-F /A (Annual Information Form) being filed and I do not have any reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations in the information contained therein that are derived from the Technical Report or that are within my knowledge as a result of the services performed by me in connection with the Technical Report.






Dated:  January 25, 2011






/s/ Douglas K. Maxwell


Douglas K. Maxwell, P.E.


Lyntek Incorporated
#### § 905.9 Handle or ship.

*Handle* or *ship* means to sell, transport, deliver, pack, prepare for market, grade, or in any other way to place fruit in the current of commerce within the production area or between any point in the production area and any point outside thereof.

[81 FR 10455, Mar. 1, 2016]
Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATIONI, D. Kent Norton, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Immunosyn Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: March 30, 2007 /s/ D. Kent Norton     D. Kent Norton    Chief Executive Officer  
48
#### § 760.1701 Administration.

This milk loss payment program will be carried out by FSA under the direction and supervision of the Deputy Administrator. In the field, the program will be administered by the State and county committees.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA,

NORTHERN DIVISION

HAROLD KELLY MURPHY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2:06-cv-618-MEF

)

SOUTHERN ENERGY HOMES, INC., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

FINAL JUDGMENT

(1) With respect to all claims in this action, judgment is ENTERED in favor of 

Defendant Southern Energy Homes, Inc., and against Plaintiff Harold Kelly Murphy, with

Plaintiff taking nothing by his claims. 

(2) Costs are TAXED against Plaintiff Harold Kelly Murphy, for which execution

may issue. 

(3) The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil

docket sheet as a Final Judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure and to close this file.

DONE this the 6 day of March, 2008. th

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 77 Filed 03/06/2008 Page 1 of 1
ANNEX 23 - DOD WAIVERS OF THE CONTRACTOR EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION CAP       In accordance with NMCARS 5231.205-91, prepare the report for DOD Waivers of the Contractor Employee Compensation Cap using the directions in this annex unless DPC provides an updated format or direction.          If no waivers were granted by the activity, submit the following statement in email text using the submission directions in NMCARS 5231.205-91.          “No waivers to section 702 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 (BBA) were granted by the agency during FY 20XX”.          If one or more waivers were granted, use the following table format in Microsoft Word to respond to the reporting requirement.          **Department of the Navy Contractor Employee Compensation Cap Waiver Reporting Template**          **FY 20XX**          Executive                            Agency                         Targeted                            Excepted                            Position                         Duties/Services                            Performed by                            Employees in                            Excepted Position                         Number of                            Employees                            In Excepted                            Position                         Amount of Allowable/                            Reimbursed Compensation                            Rec’d by EACH Employee in Excepted Position, listed by EmployeeEmployee                         Reimbursed                            Compensation Amount
Order entered December 2 9 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 15
- 00611
- CR THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

V. KENNARD HENRY RICHAR DS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 6

Dallas County, Texas Tr ial Court Cause No. F
- 1457714
- X



### O RDER
W e GRANT the State’s December 22, 2015 first motion for extension of time to file reply brief and ORDER the brief be filed no later than January 12, 2016

.
/s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG PRESIDING JUSTICE
| **National Victim	Assistance 	Academy**
**June 2002**
Foundations in victimology           and victims' rights and services 
**Table of Contents**
 The NVAA curriculum emphasizes new developments in the field of victim           assistance and several special topics, including terrorism, hate and           bias crime, stalking, victims of gang violence, campus crime and victimization,           workplace violence, rural victims, and international issues in victim           assistance.         
**To           OVC Publications****To National           Victim Assistance Academy Page** Co-Sponsoring Agencies		California State University-FresnoNational Crime Victims Research and Treatment Center		University of New Haven      Washington University
This document was last updated on December 04, 2002 |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
§ 870.3 Upland Cotton Domestic User Agreement. ( a ) To be eligible for payment under the Upland Cotton Economic Adjustment Assistance for Textile Mills program, domestic users must apply for program participation by submitting a signed original copy of the version of the Upland Cotton Domestic User Agreement, then in effect, for approval and execution by the Agricultural Marketing Service on behalf of CCC. Upon approval, AMS will return an executed copy to the domestic user.
( b ) The domestic user must stipulate in writing that the intended use of all funds received under the EAATM program will be for the sole purpose of capital expenditures directly attributable to the purpose of manufacturing upland cotton into final cotton products in the United States.
( c ) The domestic user must identify all plants and/or facilities to be included as a part of the Upland Cotton Domestic User Agreement. The domestic user must have operational control of these plants and/or facilities.
( d ) Payments will be made available to eligible domestic users who have entered into the version of an Upland Cotton Domestic User Agreement with CCC, then in effect, and who have complied with the program requirements of this part.
( e ) Upland Cotton Domestic User Agreement forms may be obtained from the Warehouse and Commodity Management Division website.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________ 

No. 1D19-0517

_____________________________ 

MAURICE LASHAWN MANNING, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Respondent. 

_____________________________ 

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel—

Original Jurisdiction. 

August 5, 2019 

PER CURIAM. 

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate 

counsel is denied on the merits. 

RAY, C.J., and KELSEY and WINOKUR, JJ., concur. 

_____________________________ 

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331. 

_____________________________ 
2 

Maurice Lashawn Manning, pro se, Petitioner. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
§ 900.306 Notice of the referendum. ( a ) The referendum agent shall at least 5 days prior to the final date for balloting: ( 1 ) Mail to each cooperative association which has elected to cast a ballot on behalf of its producers and to each of all other known producers, a notice of the referendum which will include instructions for completing the ballot, a statement as to the time within which the ballot must be mailed to, and received by, the referendum agent, a copy of the final decision, and a ballot containing a description of the terms and conditions of the order.
( 2 ) Give public notice of the referendum: ( i ) By furnishing press releases and other information to available media of public information (including but not limited to press, radio, and television facilities) serving the area, announcing the time within which ballots must be completed and mailed to and received by the referendum agent, eligibility requirements, where additional information may be procured, and other pertinent information; and
( ii ) By such other means as said agent may deem advisable.
( b ) [Reserved]
Subpart 5612.1 - ACQUISITION OF

COMMERCIAL ITEMS GENERAL

Parent topic: Part 5612 - ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL ITEMS

5612.101 Policy.

If during the acquisition process new evidence or additional requirements indicate the item no

longer falls into the category of a commercial item, the solicitation shall be cancelled and reissued.

5612.102 Applicability.

(Revised June 2018)

(a)(1) When using FAR Part 12 procedures for acquisitions exceeding $1 million in value, the RAO,

APM, or PM is responsible for completing the commerciality determination memorandum template).

(f)(1) The Director of Procurement, USSOCOM, as the head of agency, delegates the authority to

determine applicability of FAR 12.102(f) to USSOCOM headquarters contracting divisions and field

contracting office chiefs. Determinations are to be in writing and included in each file.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

DAVID W. JAHN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-623-MEF

)

REGINALD JAMES WASHINGTON, )

et al., )

)

Defendants. )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the Motion to Withdraw as Counsel of Record (Doc. #21) filed

by Shane M. Oncale on March 16, 2007, it is hereby

ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED.

DONE this the 20th day of March, 2007.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 22 Filed 03/20/2007 Page 1 of 1
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

LEROY WILLIAMS, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

 ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv658-ID

v. )

 )

STATE OF ALABAMA DEP'T OF )

TRANSPORTATION, et al., )

 )

Defendants. )

ORDER

Upon CONSIDERATION of the unopposed motion for extension (Doc. No. 11),

filed by Defendants State of Alabama Department of Transportation and Joe McInnes,

and for good cause shown, it is ORDERED that said motion be and the same is hereby

GRANTED and that the dispositive motion deadline is hereby EXTENDED to and

including March 26, 2007. 

DONE this 1st day of March 2007.

 /s/ Ira DeMent 

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00658-TFM Document 12 Filed 03/01/2007 Page 1 of 1