alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) Criminal Case No. 2:06-CR-169-WHA

)

WILMONT TIMOTHY BARNETT )

MOTION TO RESET SENTENCING

COMES NOW Defendant Wilmont Timothy Barnett, by and through counsel, and would

show the Court as follows:

Defendant has pleaded guilty in this matter and is due to appear for sentencing at 2:00

p.m., January 25, 2008.

The undersigned counsel is due to attend the Alabama Criminal Defense Lawyers

Association’s annual death penalty seminar January 24-26 and, in fact, has already paid for the

same.

The undersigned is unable to obtain substitute counsel for sentencing because there are

very serious issues in this case that require argument before the Court.

WHEREFORE, the premises considered, Defendant prays that the Court will reset the

sentencing in this case for some date on or after January 28, 2008.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, this __5th__ day of January, 2008.

/s/ JAY LEWIS

Law Offices of Jay Lewis, L.L.C.

P.O. Box 5059

Montgomery, Alabama 36103

(334) 263-7733 (Voice)

(334) 832-4390 (Fax)

J-Lewis@JayLewisLaw.com

ASB-2014-E66J

Attorney for Defendant

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 484 Filed 01/05/2008 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the _5th_ day of January, 2008, I filed the foregoing with the Clerk

of the Court by way of the CM/ECF system which will send the foregoing to the following

parties or counsel:

A. Clark Morris

Office of the United States Attorney

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, AL 36104

/s/ JAY LEWIS

Law Offices of Jay Lewis, L.L.C.

P.O. Box 5059

Montgomery, Alabama 36103

(334) 263-7733 (Voice)

(334) 832-4390 (Fax)

J-Lewis@JayLewisLaw.com

ASB-2014-E66J

Attorney for Defendant

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 484 Filed 01/05/2008 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 11

                      ARAMARK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
               COMPUTATION OF FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE (1)
                                   (Unaudited)
                      (In Thousands, except per share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                          Three Months Ended                     Six Months Ended
                                                     ----------------------------          -----------------------------
                                                     March 28,          March 29,          March 28,           March 29,
                                                       1997               1996               1997                1996
                                                     --------           ---------          ---------           ---------
<S>                                                  <C>                <C>                 <C>                <C>     
Earnings:

Net Income                                           $ 87,952           $ 13,710            $115,607           $ 38,699

Preferred stock dividends                                --                 (246)               --                 (495)
                                                     --------           --------            --------           --------


Earnings applicable to common stock                  $ 87,952           $ 13,464            $115,607           $ 38,204
                                                     ========           ========            ========           ========


Shares:

Weighted average number of common
  shares outstanding (2)                               42,699             45,041              42,521             44,982

Impact of potential exercise opportunities
  under the ARAMARK Ownership Program                   2,324              2,437               2,619              2,653
                                                     --------           --------            --------           --------

Total common and common equivalent shares              45,023             47,478              45,140             47,635
                                                     ========           ========            ========           ========

Fully diluted earnings per common and
  common equivalent share                            $   1.95           $    .28            $   2.56           $    .80
                                                     ========           ========            ========           ========

</TABLE>



(1)    Primary and fully diluted earnings per share are approximately the same.

(2)    Includes Class B plus Class A Common Shares stated on a Class B Common
       Share Equivalent Basis.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>I
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>
<CURRENCY>

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                            2,417
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1,249
<ALLOWANCES>                                         44
<INVENTORY>                                          25
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  5,316
<PP&E>                                              208
<DEPRECIATION>                                       33
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   11,669
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             4,560
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                             12
<OTHER-SE>                                        7,097
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     11,669
<SALES>                                           3,824
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  3,824
<CGS>                                             3,045
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2,481
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  495
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (2,197)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (2,197)
<EPS-BASIC>
<EPS-DILUTED>




</TABLE>
208.7003-1 Assignments under integrated materiel management (IMM).       (a)  Acquire all items assigned for IMM from the IMM manager except—          (1)  Items purchased under circumstances of unusual and compelling urgency as defined in FAR 6.302-2.  After such a purchase is made, the requiring activity must send one copy of the contract and a statement of the emergency to the IMM manager;          (2)  Items for which the IMM manager assigns a supply system code for local purchase or otherwise grants authority to purchase locally; or          (3)  When purchase by the requiring activity is in the best interest of the Government in terms of the combination of quality, timeliness, and cost that best meets the requirement.  This exception does not apply to items—          (i)  Critical to the safe operation of a weapon system;          (ii)  With special security characteristics; or          (iii)  Which are dangerous (e.g., explosives, munitions).          (b)  Follow the procedures at PGI                 208.7003-1             (b) when an item assigned for IMM is to be acquired by the requiring department in accordance with paragraph (a)(3) of this subsection.    **Parent topic:** 208.7003 Applicability.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Authority:

7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 868.26 Expenses of the cooperator or the Service.

For any request that has been withdrawn, dismissed, or withheld under §§ 868.22, 868.23, or 868.24, respectively, each applicant shall pay expenses incurred by the cooperator or the Service.

[53 FR 3722, Feb. 9, 1988. Redesignated and amended at 60 FR 16364, Mar. 30, 1995]
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 26, 2009

jm 

# Order

January 26, 2009

138110 (15)

DARRIN LA PINE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 138110
COA: 288393 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendant-Appellee.

___________________ ________________

On order of the Chief Ju stice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it
is DENIED because MCL 600.2 963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be liable for filing fees. Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $44.00, shall submit a copy of this order with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned
with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being
filed in this Court. If plaintiff timely files the partia l fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of the deposits made to plain tiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of $331.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court. Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file furth er appeals in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full.
The Clerk of the Court sh all furnish two copies of th is order to plaintiff and return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.
****Bulletin No. 99-07, Supplement 4****
****OMB Home****

November 10, 1999

BULLETIN NO. 99-07, Supplement No. 4 
TO THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND ESTABLISHMENTS 
SUBJECT: Apportionment Under the Extension of the Continuing Resolution for Fiscal Year 2000 
1. **Purpose and background.** H. J. Res. 78 extends the continuing resolution through November 17, 1999 
2. **Apportionment.** I am extending the automatic apportionment specified in section 2 of OMB Bulletin No. 99-07 to November 17, 1999. The portion of the year covered is now 13.1 percent. 
If you can justify amounts greater than the amount automatically apportioned, please submit a written request for apportionment. 
**Jacob J. Lew***Director*

Privacy Statement
The BudgetLegislative InformationManagement Reform/GPRAGrants ManagementFinancial ManagementProcurement PolicyInformation & Regulatory Policy

Help

T H E   W H I T E   H O U S E
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3050 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3050

  To suspend temporarily the duty on booster and master cyl asy-brake.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

   Mr. Hatch introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on booster and master cyl asy-brake.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BOOSTER AND MASTER CYL ASY-BRAKE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.87.01      Master cylinder     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         assembly for                                                       31/2009
                         braking systems,
                         not incorporating
                         a vacuum booster,
                         designed for use
                         in hybrid motor
                         vehicles of
                         heading 8703
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         8708.39.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.2  CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) PROMULGATED UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED I, David Eichinger, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Synthesis Energy Systems, Inc. (the Registrant).  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periods covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;  4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have:  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;  b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of this report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors:  a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Date:  September 20, 2007/s/ David EichingerDavid Eichinger
Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of Corporate Development
#### MOORE, Appellant, v. BELL & FYFE FOUNDRY CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 8, 1906.)

Action by William Moore against the Bell & Fyfe Foundry Company.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S JUNE 30, 1997 FORM 10-Q AND THRIFT FINANCIAL REPORT, IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          43,489
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                50,994
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    249,565
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        887,154
<ALLOWANCE>                                     11,469
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,288,919
<DEPOSITS>                                     952,425
<SHORT-TERM>                                   102,075
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             16,870
<LONG-TERM>                                    122,521
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,758
<OTHER-SE>                                      87,270
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,288,919
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 58,637
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               13,114
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                71,751
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              28,566
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              38,858
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           32,893
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    3,212
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 121
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 24,874
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,410
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       9,864
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,864
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.27
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.58
<LOANS-NON>                                      6,550
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    88
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                11,151
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    3,790
<RECOVERIES>                                       896
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               11,469
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             9,921
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,548
        

</TABLE>
### UTILITY IMPACT ANALYSIS James E. McMahon (JEMcMahon@LBL.gov) Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory U.S. DOE Workshop on Standards for Commercial Unitary Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps September 12, 2001 , ' • '.'**~'.** .,..••**~**•••**~.** 1"**~** 

### UTILITY IMPACT ANALYSIS James E. McMahon (lEMcMahon@LBL.gov) Ernest Orlando L,awrence BerkeleyNational Laboratory ·U.S. DOE Workshop on Standards for Commercial Unitary Air Conditioners and
, Heat Pumps September 12, 2001Utility Impact Analysis: 

### PURPOSE AND METHOD PURPOSE

- Estimate effects on electricity suppliers ofreduced energy sales due to new energy efficiency standards 

### METHOD uses NEMS-BRS

- Integrated model ofU.S. energy sector, including supply and demand

- Publicly available model, with forecast through 2020 * extrapolate beyond 2020

- Current basis: EIA Annual Energy Outlook 2001 * will update model when EIA does (usually annually) 11.J.I Utility Impact Analysis: 

### PURPOSE AND METHOD

• •**~'f.** " :. 'O'}"**~:'** 

### • PURPOSE

- Estimate effects on electricity suppliers ofreduced energy sales due to new energy efficiency standards 

### • METHOD uses NEMS-BRS

- Integrated model of

## u.s. energy sector, including supply and demand

- Publicly available model, with forecast through 2020 • extrapolate beyond 2020

- Current basis: EIA Annual Energy Outlook 2001 • will update model when EIA does (usually annually) IlLJ.}Utility Impact Analysis: 

### INPUTS Annual energy consumption and savings for commercial unitary air conditioners and heat pumps from National Energy Saving spreadsheet All other inputs from EIA

III.J.2 Utility ImpactAnalysis: 

### INPUTS

, 

### • Annual energy consumption and savings for commercial unitary air conditioners and heatpumps from National Energy Saving spreadsheet • All other inputs from EIA

111.1.2Utility Impact Analysis: 

### METHOD and OUTPUT METHOD

- NEMS-BRS balances all supply and demand given 

### savings from new energy efficiency standard OUTPUT

- Change in energy sales and price by fuel type 

### (electricity, gas, oil) by region

- Change in mix ofelectricity generation



### - Change in new capacity construction III.J.3 Utility Impact Analysis: 

### METHOD and OUTPUT ·'MET'HOD

- NEMS-BRS balances all supply and demand given savings from new energy efficiency standard 

### • OUTPUT " - Change in energy sales and price by fuel type (electricity, gas, oil) byregion

- Change in mix ofelectricity generation , - Change innew capacity construction 111.1.3Utility Impact Analysis: 

### DOE Requests Input from Stakeholders -soI., .':;. I . ::i.:? :',: -.... 

### Shouldwe considerusingalternative methods to NEMSfor conductingthe utility impactsanalysis?

III.J.4 Utility Impact Analysis: 

### DOE Requests Input from Stakeholders

. " '. .. ".....**~**...**~~** '. 

### • Shouldwe consider usingalternative methods to NEMS for conducting the utility impacts analysis?

III.JA
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 15 Filed 02/02/2007 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 15 Filed 02/02/2007 Page 2 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 15 Filed 02/02/2007 Page 3 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 15 Filed 02/02/2007 Page 4 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 15 Filed 02/02/2007 Page 5 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 15 Filed 02/02/2007 Page 6 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 15 Filed 02/02/2007 Page 7 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 15 Filed 02/02/2007 Page 8 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 15 Filed 02/02/2007 Page 9 of 9