-1- FORM 10-KSB OMB Number: 3235-0420 Expires: April 30, 2009 Estimated average burden hours per response . . . . . 1646 OMB APPROVAL  UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 Form 10-KSB/A2 (Mark One)  [ X ] ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934  For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006  [     ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from ______________ to __________________  Commission file number: 0-52252   CADISCOR RESOURCES INC. (Name of small business issuer in its charter)  Quebec, CanadaN/A(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation
or organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)1225 Gay-Lussac, Boucherville, QuebecJ4B 7K1(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)  Issuers telephone number: (450) 641-0775  Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None  Title of each class      Name of each exchange on which registered ____________________________    ___________________________________  Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:  Common Shares (Title of class)  Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes X No  ̈  SEC 2337 (12-05)   -2-  Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-B is not contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB.  State issuers revenues for its most recent fiscal year: None- Junior Exploration Company  State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of a specified date within the past 60 days. (See definition of affiliate in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.)  As of March 15, 2007 the average bid for the common shares for the past 60 days was $0.75CDN per share for and aggregate market value of $20,699,250CDN.  Note: If determining whether a person is an affiliate will involve an unreasonable effort and expense, the issuer may calculate the aggregate market value of the common equity held by non-affiliates on the basis of reasonable assumptions, if the assumptions are stated.  (ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PAST FIVE YEARS)  Check whether the issuer has filed all documents and reports required to be file by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act after the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes   ̈ No  ̈  (APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE REGISTRANTS)  State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date: 27,674,000 common shares as of March 15, 2007.  DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE  Part II Item 7: Financial Statements  The Company incorporates for reference to the present document the Cadiscor Resources Inc. audited financial statements for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006 that include U.S. GAAP reconciliation. These financial statements follow the signature page of the present document.   Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check one): Yes ____; No __X__     PART 1  Item 1. Business.  2006 marked the inaugural year of Cadiscor Resources Inc. (the Company or Cadiscor). Cadiscor was created as a subsidiary of Strateco Resources Inc. (Strateco) to hold Stratecos gold assets. In exchange for the transfer of the properties, Cadiscor issued 20,000,000 common shares to Strateco and assumed previous obligations related to the acquisition of those assets. The Cadiscor shares were later distributed to Strateco shareholders on a pro rata basis.    -3-  From the outset, the Company rapidly took certain steps to secure its future development. The third quarter of 2006 saw the closing of an Initial Public Offering (IPO), the listing of the Companys shares on the TSX Venture Exchange under the symbol CAO and on the Frankfurt Exchange under the symbol DQN, and the initiation of exploration work by the Company.  On August 17, 2006, the Company announced that it had closed an IPO for $6,599,000. The offering included flow-through common shares and units (Units). Each Unit consisted of one common shares of Cadiscor and half a warrant. Each whole warrant entitling its holder to purchase one common share of Cadiscor at $1.25 for a period of 18 months following the closing date of the financing. Each Unit and flow-through common share purchased by the investment syndicate, which was led by Dundee Securities Corporation and included Canaccord Capital Inc. and Haywood Securities Inc., was priced at $1.00.  This initial financing was primarily used to finance exploration on the Discovery property during the year. After deducting brokerage, listing and legal fees and the repayment of the balance of the Discovery property purchase price, the Company had approximately $5,400,000, including $4,300,000 in flow-through funds that must be spent on exploration by December 31, 2007.  On August 18, 2006, the TSX Venture Exchange approved the listing of 27,599,000 common shares of Cadiscor. The shares began trading under the symbol CAO at the opening of the market on August 21, 2006. Since September 11, 2006, the shares have also traded on the Frankfurt Exchange under the symbol DQN.  The Company began operations in September 2006 with the planning of the drilling program on the Discovery property. Dresden Capital of Montreal was retained as an investor relations advisor to publicize the Company and its projects.  Management also held numerous meetings to inform investors on the Company and its growth potential, and a website was created to provide direct, easy access to information on the Company, at www.cadiscor.com.  As part of its IPO, the Company had geological consultants InnovExplo Inc. prepare a report on the Discovery zone in compliance with National Instrument 43-101. The report identified a total indicated resource of 381,100 tonnes grading 6.74 g/t Au and an inferred resource of 847,200 tonnes grading 6.35 g/t Au. The authors of the report noted the good continuity of the gold-bearing zones, and the strong potential for extending the zones laterally and at depth through additional drilling.  Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve Estimates  Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors concerning estimates of Measured and Indicated Resources. This section uses the terms measured and indicated resources. We advise U.S. investors that while those terms are recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize them. U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of mineral deposits in these categories will ever be converted into reserves.  Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors concerning estimates of Inferred Resources. This section uses the term inferred resources. We advise U.S. investors that while this term is recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize it. Inferred resources have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an Inferred Mineral Resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of Inferred Mineral Resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies, except in rare cases. U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume that part or all of an inferred resource exists, or is economically or legally minable. 1. Mineral Resource Classification, Category and Definition  The Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM) guideline for resource classification includes the following definitions which are pertinent to the classification of the Discovery resource:    -4-  A Mineral Resourceis a concentration or occurrence of natural, solid, inorganic or fossilized organic material in or on the Earths crust in such form and quantity and of such a grade or quality that it has reasonable prospects for economic extraction. The location, quantity, grade, geological characteristics and continuity of a mineral resource are known, estimated or interpreted from specific geological evidence and knowledge.  An Inferred Mineral Resourceis that part of a mineral resource for which quantity and grade or quality can be estimated on the basis of geological evidence and limited sampling and reasonably assumed, but not verified, geological and grade continuity. The estimate is based on limited information and sampling gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes.  An Indicated Mineral Resourceis that part of a mineral resource for which quantity, grade or quality, densities, shape and physical characteristics can be estimated with a level of confidence sufficient to allow the appropriate application of technical and economic parameters, to support mine planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit.  The estimate is based on detailed and reliable exploration and testing information gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes that are spaced closely enough for geological and grade continuity to be reasonably assumed.  For the Discovery Claims Block, the following parameters were used to define the indicated and inferred resources:  Indicated Resource  The indicated resource was defined in areas where the mineralized lenses can be delineated by a series of drill hole intercepts with a grade greater than 3.00 g/t over 1.6 m and a maximum drill holes spacing of 60 m. In some areas where there was insufficient information to confirm the presence of the mineralized zone on the other side of the fault, the limits of the lenses were confined by these late faults.  Only the B zone contains an indicated resource, in three distinct lenses. The other zones are characterized only by an inferred resource.  Inferred Resource  A radius of 40 metres from a single diamond drill hole intercept was used to define the inferred resource.  In the B zone, one mineralized lens located between Sections 600 W and 350 W and between elevations-350 m and 0 m is defined by four diamond drill hole intercepts with grade higher than 3.00 g/t over 1.6 m. The maximum distance between drill holes is 130 m and the minimum is 100 m. The shape of the inferred lenses is based on the shape and size of indicated lenses. All the volume contained within these other lenses has been defined as inferred.  The late faults were not used to limit the inferred resource. These faults cause a few meters of displacement, but even though the exact location of the mineralized zone is not well known, the zone should continue on the other side, and therefore the volume is not affected.  1. Methodology  InnovExplo chose to use the polygonal method on longitudinal section. The interpretation was done on cross-sections at 10-meter spacing at a scale of 1:500. The cross-section interpretation was transferred onto a set of five plan views at 100-meter spacings to validate the interpretation in the other dimension.  The geological interpretation was digitized and the composites and horizontal thicknesses were then calculated using Gemcom Software. All the calculated composites were validated individually on the cross-sections to confirm that the grade and thickness were properly calculated. The diamond drill hole intercepts were then located on five longitudinal sections, one for each zone. The polygons were traced, and the volume and grade were calculated using Gemcom Software. A list of the volume and grade for each drill hole intercept above the 3.00 g/t Au cut-off is included in Appendix D to the technical report.    -5- 2. Data  Diamond drill holes: 113
Drill hole intercepts: 270
Samples in zones: 1,368 3. Parameters  Minimum mining width: 1.6 m (horizontal thickness) Cut-off grade: 3.00 g/t Au, 5.00 g/t Au and 7.00 g/t Au  The specific gravity database used for the current estimate includes measurements from various drilling programs. InnovExplo used an average specific gravity of 2.82 g/cm3 calculated by SRK from the available data. For the 2003 resources evaluation, SRK used a capping of 15 g/t Au for the 2 m composites. InnovExplo Inc. did not use compositing and worked with the original sample length. The capping grade was calculated at 35 g/t Au on the original sample length based on the log normal probability plot and on the log normal histogram.  4. Mineral Resource Estimate  The resource for the Discovery Claims Block was revised with two goals: (1) to re-estimate the resource using a method better suited to a narrow, high-grade vein-type gold deposit; and (2) to prepare the project for a pre-feasibility study on an underground operation. InnovExplo Inc. judged that the interpolation block model method used in 2003 did not apply to this type of narrow high grade vein mineralization.  Generally speaking, applying this method to this type of mineralization tends to create a smearing effect of high grade values into the barren walls of the veins, thus causing tonnage to rise and grade to fall. The total number of ounces can be similar, but the accuracy required for a detailed economic assessment of a possible conventional underground operation is not obtained with the block model method.  The polygon method on longitudinal section selected by InnovExplo Inc. enhances local accuracy. Moreover, this methods main advantage is to force geologists to interpret each zone manually using each diamond drill hole. The geological continuity is thus established first, based on strict geological criteria such as structural elements, alteration zones, veins and lithologies, and not strictly on gold values.  The resource was calculated at three different cut-off grades: 3.00 g/t Au, 5.00 g/t Au and 7.00 g/t Au (see tables below). The 3.00 g/t Au cut-off grade was used to determine the continuity and shape of the mineralized lenses and to provide a comparison with SRKs 2003 resource estimate. Compared to SRKs estimate, the indicated resource tonnage increased by 12%, grade by 36% and ounces by 89%. The inferred resource tonnage decreased by 49%, grade increased by 47% and ounces decreased by 25%.  InnovExplo Inc. is of the opinion that the reader should use the figures based on the 3.00 g/t Au cut-off, which produces an indicated resource of 381,100 tonnes grading 6.73 g/t Au, or 82,406 ounces and an inferred resource of 847,200 tonnes grading 6.35 g/t Au, or 173,091 ounces.  Estimation of the Cut-off Grade  The estimation of the cut-off grade is based on cost published by Infomine USA, 2006.  These numbers are an average cost from several similar mines and represent an order of magnitude number.  Real cost estimate will have to be determined in a pre-feasibility study.  InnovExplo considers that the numbers presented are reasonable figures for the cut-off grade estimation of the Discovery project.  The two (2) methods proposed were selected according to the mineralized zones geometry, continuity and thickness and are considered adequate for the project.  All units are metric, and all cost and metal price are in 2006 US dollars.   -6- Cost per tonne for Sublevel Longhole mining with Shaft access at 800 tonnes* per day  Cash Cost: $25.64 Capital Cost: $24.92 TOTAL COST: $50.56  Cost per tonne for Shrinkage mining with shaft access at 1000 tonnes* per day  Cash Cost: $41.78 Capital Cost: $24.67 TOTAL COST: $66.45  *Daily rate used was the most representative one presented in Infomine and 800 tpd for Shrinkage mining was not available.  It is expected that the Discovery project could be mined using both mining methods depending on the thickness of the mineralized zones.  The ratio between both methods has to be determined.  Considering 50% by shrinkage mining method and 50% by sublevel longhole mining method, the average total mining cost would be $58.50 per tonne.  The gross metal values, using $600 per ounce for the different cut-off grades used, are:  · 3.0 g/t =  $ 52.50 /t · 5.0 g/t =  $ 87.60 /t · 7.0 g/t =  $122.40 /t  The metallurgical process for the Discovery mineralized material determined by Lakefield Research (1998) is by whole rock cyanidation and the anticipated recovery is 96%.  The cost for milling and transportation (if required) or for the construction of a mill plant will have to be determined in the pre-feasibility study.  The order of magnitude for the milling using cyanidation process in the Abitibi area varies from $6.00 per tonne to $25 per tonne depending on the mill location and mill daily rate tonnage. The Sleeping Giant Mine located nearby has milling cost of $18 per tonne.  The average grade determined for the Discovery deposit is 6,74g/t Au for the indicated resources. The in situ calculated value is $117.85/t using $600 per ounce.  In Canada, according to NI 43-101, in order to calculate a resource you have to use parameters that reflect the possibility of a resource to be eventually qualified as a reserve. Therefore a consultant will fix minimum requirement of grade, true widths and continuity for him to be able to do a calculation of the resources. The consultant, InnovExplo inc. recommends using a minimum cut-off of 3g/t AU in evaluating the resources of the Discovery property. In the area of Val DOr, a deposit, the East-Amphi Mine of Richmont Mines is being mined at a profit with a production grade of 3g/t AU. The deposit is similar to Discovery, with narrow quartz veining in sheared zones and is mined underground, as envisioned for an eventual mining underground operation on Discovery.  The resource was also calculated using a 5.00 g/t. The results show that continuity is still good at this cut-off. The 7.00 g/t Au cut-off value indicates some high grade zones in the deposit. The tonnage and ounces are sensitive to grade and decrease rapidly at the higher 7.00 g/t Au cut-off, indicating the limited amount of high grade tonnage currently in the deposit.  On September 25, 2006, the Company announced that it had granted a contract for 19,000 metres of drilling on the Discovery property. The contract provided for the use of two drills at the outset, with the addition of a third in mid-December. In October 2006, the Company began drilling on Discovery to increase the Discovery zone resource and upgrade the resource from inferred to indicated. At year-end, 11,763 metres had been drilled and 23 holes completed. Full assay results received for nine holes as at December 31, 2006, confirmed the presence and continuity of the mineralization, as well as the potential for additional high-grade gold mineralization around and below the Discovery zone.  -7-  Seven of the first nine holes returned gold grades equal to or greater than the grades calculated in InnovExplo Inc.s qualification report, which attests to the strength and continuity of the mineralization. The following is a summary of the best drill results reported in the press release dated December 12, 2006:  HoleAu (g/t)Length*
(m)B-06-1077.023.80B-06-1086.253.45B-06-1096.833.60B-06-1107.642.00B-06-1127.711.40B-06-11324.702.00B-06-1166.663.00 * core length  Management also entered into two partnership agreements. On November 30, 2006, the Company announced that it had signed an option agreement with Agnico-Eagle Mines Limited ("Agnico") for the Montbray gold property. This option provides for Agnico to earn a 50% undivided interest by conducting exploration worth $750,000 over four years and making payments totalling $60,000 over the same period. Agnico will be the project operator. Once it has earned its 50% interest, Agnico has a three-year option to increase its interest to 60% by funding the full cost of $10,000,000 of exploration or a bankable feasibility study. This agreement allows the Company to benefit immediately, not only from Agnicos recognized gold exploration know-how, but from the propertys exploration potential, without the dilution that would result from funding this work through a share offering.  On December 19, 2006, the Company signed a letter of intent with Canadian Royalties Inc. to acquire a 50% interest in the Cameron Shear property. This property covers the eight-kilometre extension to the east of the geological formations seen on the Discovery property. The Cameron Shear property consists of 193 claims covering 3,038 hectares. The Company issued 75,000 shares to Canadian Royalties Inc. upon signature of the agreement, and must incur $1,000,000 in exploration over five years and make total cash payments of $50,000 over the same period to earn its interest. Once it has acquired its 50% interest, the Company may acquire another 10% by financing the entire cost of a bankable feasibility study. The Company is the project operator. This agreement enables the Company to consolidate its control over an area that is relatively unexplored but has strong gold potential given the results obtained to date on Discovery.  At December 31, 2006, your Company held 100% interests in the Discovery and Montbray properties and an option on the Cameron Shear property, three gold exploration projects.  On December 31, 2006, Cadiscor shares were trading at $0.77 on the TSX Venture Exchange. In just over four months since they were listed, over 18,000,000 shares traded, nearly 65% of the capitalization. The decline in price relative to the issue price was partly due to the pressure resulting from the rapid sale of some of the shares distributed to Strateco shareholders. The share price has firmed since October 2006 thanks to managements efforts to raise the Companys profile, combined with steps taken by the investor relations firm and the release of drill results for the Discovery property. The rising gold market also helped support the share price.  On February 19, 2007, the Company released in a press release more drill results for the Discovery property. The best result was 13.11 g/t Au over 5.4 metres in Hole B-06-123, confirming the projects gold potential. Drilling is ongoing until the end of March 2007, after which a new resource calculation will be performed. An opportunity study on an underground exploration program will also be carried out.  On behalf of the Board of Directors, (Signed) Michel Bouchard Date: March 5, 2007    -8- Item 2. Properties.  Exploration and mining risks related to major unforeseen events, availability of personal, and costs of machinery, equipment, operations and compliance with governmental regulations.  The exploration of mining properties is a high-risk industry. Presently, none of the Companys properties or projects have a known body of commercial mineral. Unusual or unexpected formations, formation pressures, fires, power outages, labor disruptions, flooding, explorations, cave-ins, landslides, and the inability to obtain adequate machinery, equipment or labor are all risks involved in the operation of mines and the conduct of exploration programs.  The Company relies on consultants and other professionals for exploration. The Company requires substantial resources to establish reserves, develop metallurgical processes to extract metal from the mineral, and develop mining and processing facilities at a given site.  The cost of developing gold and other mineral properties is affected by the cost of operations, variations in the grade, fluctuations in metal markets and the cost of processing equipment. Government regulations regarding prices, taxes, royalties, allowable production, importing and exporting of minerals, land use, land tenure and environmental protection also affect economic viability.  Uncertainties related to stage of exploration depends on availability of financing and operating history of the Company.  The Company is a junior natural resource exploration company and has no production revenue.  It does not have an operating history upon which investors may rely. The Company has limited financial resource. The Company must renew constantly its efforts to obtain adequate financing in the future. Failure to obtain such additional financing could result in delay or indefinite postponement of further exploration of its projects. We recognize that we also expect to face the risks, uncertainties, expenses and difficulties frequently encountered by companies at the start up stage of their business development. These risks and uncertainties and the Companys failure to do so could have a materially adverse effect on Companys financial condition.  Only exploration and no research as of now  The Company has not conducted any research or development activities since its incorporation nor did Strateco prior to the transfer of Discovery Property and Montbray properties to Cadiscor, since only exploration programs have been conducted up to now.  Canadian and U.S. regulations regarding estimation of resources are not the same. Please see Cautionary Notes and definitions in previous section entitled: BUSINESS  All properties are at an exploration stage and without known reserves. There is no plant or equipment on any of these properties. For power, in the case of all properties, the provincial power grid is located within a 20 kilometres range and could be extended to each property if warranted, eventually. Water is plentiful on all properties and in the region and it is generally pumped from wells or ancient diamond drill holes if needed.  The Company holds 100% of two mining properties and an option on third. Those three properties are all located in Québec and cover 345 claims for a total area of 7,529 hectares.    -9-  Discovery Project 100% interest  DISCOVERY PROPERTY  The following map shows the location of the properties in Northwestern Québec, Canada:   [form10ksba231dec06without001.jpg]  Property Description The Discovery property is the result of the merger of the Discovery project (the Discovery Claims Block) and the Cameron project (the Cameron Claims Block). These two projects were the subject of an Option and Venture Agreement between Strateco et GéoNova Explorations Inc since October 2, 2002 by which Strateco could obtain 51% interest in these two projects. On February 15, 2006, when Strateco purchased from GéoNova a 100% interest in the two projects instead of pursuing the option Agreement, Discovery Project and Cameron Project were called thereafter by Strateco and GéoNova for the purpose of the purchase/sale Agreement  the Discovery Property.   -10-  Location, access and Mining Claims  The Discovery property is located (see Map of Properties Location) approximately 35 km northwest of the town of Lebel-sur-Quévillon, Québec, Canada and consists of a total of 124 mining claims in Desjardins and Bruneau townships for a total surface area of 3,371 hectares. Since August 17, 2006, Cadiscor holds a 100% interest in these 124 mining claims. Gold Potential  The project is strategically located in the eastern extension of the Harricana-Turgeon belt, which hosts the Matagami, Joutel and Casa-Bérardi mining camps. The project lies along a southeastern-striking section of a regional network of interconnected deformation corridors that extend eastward from the Quebec-Ontario border, crossing the Northern Volcanic Zone of the Abitibi Greenstone Belt. This network of deformation zones (Cameron-Casa-Bérardi deformation zone) represents a major geological discontinuity characterized by the interruption of structural and stratigraphic interference patterns.  Exploration Work  Previous exploration conducted on the Discovery project from 1986 to 2006, particularly by Homestake Canada Ltd., GéoNova Exploration Inc. and Strateco, led to the delineation of the Discovery gold-bearing zone for a distance of over 800 metres and to a depth of 700 metres. The Discovery mineralized zone splits into three subvertical gold-bearing lenses, each 100 to 200 metres wide. On the East lens, the deepest hole drilled below the -400-metre level returned intersections of 11.97 g/t Au over 4.35 metres. On the Central lens, the deepest hole, drilled at over 600 metres below surface, returned 4.33 g/t Au over 7.59 metres, including 5.51 g/t Au over 5.11 metres. These two zones remain open at depth.  In May 2006, InnovExplo Inc. completed an National Instrument 43-101 compliant report that indicates that the Discovery zone contains an indicated resource of 381,100 tonnes @ 6.74 g/t Au and an inferred resource of 847,200 tonnes @ 6.35 g/t Au.  The report indicates that the gold-bearing zones are continuous, and that the potential for converting the inferred resource into an indicated resource is high. The report also mentions that there is strong potential for increasing the resource through additional drilling, particularly at depth, below the known gold-bearing zones.    -11- [form10ksba231dec06without002.jpg]   -12-  In October 2006, the Company initiated a drilling program aimed at increasing the Discovery zone resource and upgrading it from inferred to indicated. At December 31, 2006, 11,763 metres had been drilled in 23 holes.  The Company released assays for 24 holes in press releases dated December 12, 2006 and February 19, 2007. The following is a summary of the best drill results, from these press releases:  HoleAu (g/t)Length*
(m)B-06-73B7.251.15B-06-1077.023.80B-06-1086.253.45B-06-1096.833.60B-06-1107.642.00B-06-1127.711.40B-06-11324.702.00B-06-1166.663.00B-06-1198.213.00B-06-1206.121.40B-06-1216.723.00B-06-12313.115.40B-07-124A8.871.90B-06-13210.942.75 * core length  These results confirm the presence and continuity of strong gold mineralization at depth and surrounding the three Discovery zone lenses. More particularly, Hole B-06-123, which returned 13.11 g/t Au over 5.40 metres, showed that the East lens remains open at a depth of 600 metres below surface.  In the 600E section, 600 metres east of the Discovery zone, holes drilled by Strateco led to the identification of a new area of interest, where three mineralized zone were intersected, two of which returned interesting results, namely 7.00 g/t Au over 1.75 metres and 5.85 g/t Au over 2.20 metres.  Hole B-06-132, which returned 10.94 g/t Au over 2.75 metres confirmed the potential of this relatively unexplored area of the property.  Historical Sampling, Assaying and QAQC Protocol Innovexplo was mandated by Cadiscor Resources to report on previous drilling and to design an appropriate QAQC protocol for the Cadiscor drilling program.  Sampling techniques did not vary much through the three stages of activity on the Discovery Project. Assay samples have been collected in half core to provide sample of variable lengths depending on geology but no longer than 1.5 m. Early samples were collected by mechanically splitting core in half. From 1996 onward, assay samples from presumed mineralized sections were collected by sawing core in half. The remaining half was put back in core boxes for witness. The core is in good condition and there is no evidence of misplaced pieces. Sample tags are generally still readable . Samples collected by GéoNova were assayed at two laboratories in the Abitibi region:  Technilab or Abilab with check assays at the other lab. GéoNova did extensive checks of the assays which were very consistent. In the more recent drilling programs performed by Strateco, blanks and standards were inserted in the sample stream and the results carefully monitored.  During the 2004 drilling program executed by Strateco, the drilling cores were sampled with a diamond saw.  Usually, samples are 0.75 m to 1.25 m long.  Half of the cut core was kept as witness sample and the other half was sent for analysis to the ALS Chemex/Chimitec laboratory in Val-dOr.  The preparation and gold analysis protocols of 2002 and 2003 drilling programs were modified in order to improve the reproductibility of gold analyses.    -13-  Samples were crushed at 90% -2mm.  A representative portion of 1000 g to minus 10 mesh was pulverized at 85% minus 200 mesh and homogenized.  A 50-gram pulp portion was analyzed by fire assay with atomic absorption finish.  Analysis verifications were systematically made on rejects (pulp 2) by fire assay with atomic absorption finish on samples grading over 2 g/t Au and with gravimetric finish for those grading over 5 g/t Au.  Approximately 10% of the first pulps were sent to the Bourlamaque Laboratory in Val-dOr for additional analytical verifications. Specific gravity determinations (density) were obtained for gold zones of economic interest.  Standard samples were added to the samples sent to the ALS Chemex/Chimitec laboratory as an integral part of a quality control program.  InnovExplo believes the quality of the analytical data is reliable and that the sample preparation, analysis and security measures were carried out in accordance with best practices and industry standards.  Cadiscor Resources, 2006-2007, Discovery Property Drilling program.  Sampling, Assaying and QA/QC Protocol   Objectives  The objectives of the QA/QC program designed for Cadiscor Resources by InnovExplo are to monitor and document the quality and integrity of the sampling, preparation and assaying of samples for the Discovery property drilling campaign.  The QA/QC program documents all sampling, preparation and assaying protocols, monitors and documents results and documents evaluations of results pro-actively.  Establishing proper QA/QC protocols allows pro-active monitoring of several key elements in the sampling, sample preparation and assaying process.  Using a series of quality control samples, the entire sampling, sample preparation and assaying process is monitored and evaluated for: · Suitability of field sample size by measuring precision of field duplicate samples;  · Integrity of field sampling and sample shipment by monitoring results of field blanks and sample shipment procedures;  · Possible contamination through the sample preparation and assaying process by monitoring results of field blank standards submitted as regular samples and the monitoring of laboratory analytical blank standard results;  · Suitability of crushing/splitting/pulverization sizes by measuring precision of coarse and pulp duplicate samples;  · The level of accuracy in the assaying can also be monitored by measuring the accuracy of the laboratories internal certified reference standards and by assaying of blind certified reference standards in each batch of samples.  The following is a breakdown of the protocols used for the number, type and distribution of QC samples in each batch of samples shipped from the field and fused in the furnaces at selected laboratory.  The number of QC samples has been co-ordinated with the maximum furnace batch size.  For a Field sub-batch of 24 regular samples including 21 regular samples/field; One duplicate sample was selected at random; One field blank standard was selectively placed after possible high grade samples (submitted as regular samples, blind to laboratory) and One Certified reference material (CRM) sample. Samples shipped from the field were identified by individual sample number including batch and sub-batch identification. For each sub-batch, 1 of each of the following samples was prepared by the laboratory people and inserted into each sub-batch of 24 samples: 1 coarse crush duplicate sample split selected at random and 1 pulp duplicate sample    -14-  split selected at random. The laboratory randomly added to the sub-batches one internal analytical blank standard and 2 internal CRMs inserted at random.   Samples  The regular samples are provided from NQ drill core that will be split to provide a one half split of the original whole core.  The remaining half split core will be kept in the core box as witness.  The minimum sample length should be 0.5 m and the maximum length 1.5 m.   Standards (Certified reference material)  Blind CRMs - Three differing grade certified reference standards (CRMs) were inserted into the batch by the on-site geologist.  The recommended CRMs used are from Rocklabs of New Zealand and are identified below:  CRM# SJ32 2.645 g/t Au (+/-0.027) containing 3.0% sulphide in matrix SN26 8.543 g/t Au (+/- 0.072) containing 3.2% sulphide in matrix SP27 18.10 g/t Au (+/-0.27) containing 3.5% sulphide in matrix  The goal of the lower grade CRM is to monitor the accuracy of assaying at grades that are considered significant albeit below the cut-off grade level for the Discovery project which is 3 g/t Au.   Other Considerations  Visible Gold & High Sulphide Samples  Each field sample that contains visible gold or a large amount of sulphides is systematically assayed using a metallic screen analysis.  Analytical Finish Re-assaying  The protocols for initial analytical determination use AAS. Since the precision of AAS analytical gold determinations above 3.0 to 5.0 g/t Au is considered less accurate, all samples with initial results reported above 3.0 g/t Au were immediately re-assayed using a gravimetric finish with both results reported by the laboratory.  For the current resource estimate, InnovExplo averages all the assays contained in the database for each sample, without any rules of precedence. Even though some assaying method like metallic sieve have better precision than method by fire assay with gravimetric or atomic absorption finish, each assaying method has its percentage of error on the precision. A large portion of this error is coming directly at the sampling and at the preparation. The precision of the assay is dependent on the size of the initial sample and the initial crush/split specifications. Because those different samples and sub-sample are generally too small to completely avoid the nugget effect in gold deposit, even a metallic sieve assaying method can not be perfectly accurate. By averaging more than one assaying point in the same sample, it minimized the nugget effect and minimized the total error on the final value.  The drilling program will continue until the end of March 2007, following which a new resource calculation will be performed. An opportunity study will also be carried out on an underground exploration program.  Cameron Shear Project Option to acquire a 50% interest  Location and Access  The Cameron Shear project lies adjacent to the eastern part of the Discovery project. It lies 35 kilometres northwest of Lebel-sur-Quévillon, Québec, in Desjardins Township. The project is accessible via a gravel road linking Lebel-sur-Quévillon to Matagami. A large network of logging roads facilitates property access.     -15-  Mining Claims  The project is wholly-owned by Canadian Royalties Inc. and it consists of 193 claims covering an area of 3,038 hectares. In December 2006, the Company signed a letter of intent with Canadian Royalties Inc. stipulating that the Company may acquire an undivided 50% interest by funding $1,000,000 in exploration and making payments of $50,000 over a five-year period. The Company also issued 75,000 shares to Canadian Royalties Inc. upon signature of the agreement. Once it has earned its 50% interest, the Company may earn an additional 10% interest by financing the entire cost of a bankable feasibility study. The Company is the project operator.  Gold Potential  The property covers an eight-kilometre section of the Cameron deformation zone between the Flordin gold deposit and Discovery. The Cameron deformation zone is part of a regional network of interconnected deformation corridors extending east from the Québec-Ontario border and crossing the Northern Volcanic Zone of the Abitibi Greenstone Belt. This network of deformation zones represents a major geological discontinuity characterized by an interruption of the structural and stratigraphic pattern.  Exploration Work  The property is relatively unexplored. Sporadic work was reported from 1937 to 1986. From 1986 to 1988, a joint venture between Quinterra, Noramco and Golden Triangle led to exploration work on a vast property that included the Cameron Shear property. A hole drilled by Klondike Gold in 1997, during the last reported work program, returned 0.5 g/t Au over 7.6 metres.  The Company plans to conduct a $100,000 exploration program in 2007, consisting primarily of a magnetometry and electromagnetic helicopter-borne survey that was carried out in February 2007.  Montbray Project 100 % interest  Location and Access  The Montbray property lies in central Montbray Township some 30 kilometres west of Rouyn-Noranda, Québec. The property is accessed by trails off a gravel road that connects to the paved road linking Rouyn-Noranda and La Sarre.  Mining Claims  The project consists of 28 claims covering an area of 1,120 hectares. In November 2006, the Company signed a letter of intent with Agnico-Eagle Mines Limited providing for Agnico to acquire a 50% undivided interest by funding $750,000 in exploration and making payments of $60,000 over a four-year period. Agnico is the exploration project operator. Once it has earned its 50% interest, Agnico has a three-year option to increase its interest to 60% by financing alone $10,000,000 in additional exploration or conducting a bankable feasibility study.  Exploration Work  Previous exploration on the Montbray project from 1996 to 2001, particularly by Altavista Mines and Strateco , led to the discovery of three mineralized showings, including the Montbray showing, where channel sampling returned 17.53 g/t Au  over 0.75 metres and 4.51g/t Au over 2.5 metres. The subsequent drilling program confirmed the extension of the Montbray showing at depth. The best values were 7.67 g/t Au over 2.35 metres and 2.96 g/t Au over 2.18 metres. During the most recent work done on the property in 2001, a drilling program located the eastern extension of the gold-bearing structure on the Agnico property adjacent to the western part of the Montbray property. The most significant result was 1.38 g/t Au over 1.55 metres associated with a fault zone.  A $100,000 exploration program is planned by Agnico-Eagle for the Montbray property in 2007 to be performed by Agnico..   -16-  Item 3. Legal proceedings.  The Company is not a party to any pending legal proceedings, and no such proceedings are known to be threatened or contemplated.  Item 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.  There were no new matters submitted to a Vote of Security Holders since the filing of Form 10-QSB as of September 30, 2006.    -17-  PART 11  Item 5 Market for Registrants Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters.                          (a) Market information  CURRENCY AND EXCHANGE RATES  All dollar amounts set forth in this report are in Canadian dollars, except where otherwise indicated.  The following table sets forth (i) the rates of exchange for the Canadian dollar, expressed in the U.S. dollars, in effect at the end of each of the periods indicated; (ii) the average exchange rates in effect on the last day of the end of each such period; (iii) the high and low exchange rate during such periods, in each case based on the noon buying rate in cable transfers in Canadian dollars as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Prices based on the period January 1 to December 31 yearly, and quoted in U.S. Dollars.  2006Rate at end of Period1.1652Average Rate During Period1.131High Rate1.172Low Rate1.099  The high and low exchange rates for each month during the previous six months are as follows:  September 2006October
2006November
2006December
2006January
2007February
2007High rate$1,1272$1,1384$1,1474$1,1652$1,1824$1,1852Low rate$1,1052$1,1154$1,1275$1,1415$1,1647$1,1609  On March 15, 2007 the noon buying rate in New York City for cable transfer in Canadian dollars as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York was$ 1.00 USD=$1.17  The Companys securities are traded in Canada as Cadiscor Resources Inc. (CAO) on the TSX Venture Exchange since August 21, 2006 and on the Frankfurt Exchange under the symbol DQN since September 8, 2006.  Based on information obtained from the TSX Venture Exchange, the high and low bid quotations for the common stock of the Company for 6 business days are set forth in the table below:  LowHighVolumeMarch 15$0.80$0.8463,801March 14$0.77$0.86118,722March 13$0.80$0.85171,045March 12$0.84$0.8779,898March 9$0.83$0.87187,542March 8$0.80$0.86140,702    -18-                          Prior sales of common shares in Canada  The common shares of the Company have been trading on the TSX Venture Exchange under the symbol CAO since August 21, 2006.  HighLowVolumeAugust 21, 2006$0.75$0.64137,000December 29, 2006$0.77$0.72104,398  Price Fluctuations, Share Price Volatility  Securities markets in Canada have experienced a high level of price and volume volatility in recent years, with many resource companies experiencing wide price fluctuations not necessarily related to operating performance or underlying asset values of such companies.  No assurance can be made that the Companys share price and volume will not continue to fluctuate materially.  (b) Offerings in Quebec and in Canada  Since its incorporation on March 6, 2006 and until August 21, 2006, the Company had total assets not exceeding $10,000,000 and the Company securities were not quoted in an automated inter-dealer quotation system. The Company therefore meets the criteria of Rule 12g-1 which allows for exemption of registration from Section 12 (g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 under these circumstances. Furthermore the Company is considered a foreign private issuer and had since August 21, 2006 fewer than 300 holders resident in the United States and was also exempted from registration under Section 12 (g) in meeting the criteria of Rule 12g3- 2.  However, the Company elected to register its common shares under section 12 (g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 under Form 10 SB which allows the small business to comply with the requirement of the SEC at lower costs. The main purpose of this registration was to allow the shareholders of Strateco Resources Inc., a company which has its common shares registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission since September 2002, to receive the shares of Cadiscor. Strateco as discussed in Form 10/SBA2, section DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS, ITEM 1 (b) was acting in the context of a distribution by Strateco of 20,000,000 shares of Cadiscor to its shareholders of record in all jurisdictions.                (c) Private offerings in Quebec, Canada  The Companys private placement to Strateco of 20,000,000 common shares for acquisition of properties was an exempted transaction not requiring the filing of registration statement pursuant to Section 4 (2) of Securities Act of 1933 since it did not involve any public offering.  The Company was at the time of the private placement with Strateco exempted to file a prospectus for the private placement with Strateco according to the rules and regulations of the QuebecsLaw on moveable securities and Quebecs Rules and regulations on moveable securities and particularly Rule 45-106 art. 2.13 (2) and obtained the authorization from the TSX Venture Exchange. Pursuant to this private placement, the Company issued 20,000,000 common shares to Strateco Resources Inc. as partial consideration for the acquisition of a 100% interest in the Discovery and Montbray properties as described in the following table:    -19-  Date of private placementPrivate placementValueNumber of sharesNumber of warrantsConsiderationAugust 17, 2006Strateco Resources Inc.$3,200,17220,000,0000Partial consideration for the acquisition of 100% interest in Discovery property and Montbray property  On August 3, 2006, Cadiscor received the final visa for a prospectus offering in Quebec, Canada, from the Quebec Securities Commission and TSX Venture Exchange (TSX)to issue 1,000,000 common shares to GéoNova Exploration Inc. as partial consideration of the acquisition of a 100% interest in the Discovery property instead of a payment in cash of $1,000,000 since these shares were qualified by prospectus.  The placement of 1,000,000 common shares to GéoNova Exploration Inc. as partial payment of Discovery Property did not involve any public offering but were qualified by the same prospectus and the same visa of Quebec Securities Commission than the public offering since the price of the shares were qualified at the same price and were exempted form sale restriction since it was approved by visa of the Quebec Securities Commission. This placement qualifies for the exemption pursuant to Section 4(2) of Securities Act of 1933 since it did not involve any public offering and the Companys securities were not sold or delivered after sale in the United States of America and were therefore not in violation of dispositions of Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933.                          (d) Public offering in Quebec, Canada  The Company conducted one public offering in Quebec, Canada, with a visa for prospectus of the Quebec Securities Commission and the approval of the TSX Venture Exchange (TSX). This public offering is detailed as follows:   Initial public offering by Prospectus (1)Number of Flow-trough shares sold (2)Number of units sold
(2) (3):Amount received:
$ (3)Number of common shares issued (3)Number of warrants (3)Brokers fees (4)Brokers warrants (4)August 17, 2006 closing4,300,0002,299,000$6,599,0006,599,0001,149,500$461,930461,930August 17, 2006
Partial consideration paid to GéoNova Explorations Inc. for the acquisition of 100% interest in Discovery property (5)Valued by prospectus  at $1,000,0001,000,000 common shares qualified by prospectus  (1) On August 3, 2006, Cadiscor received the final visa for a prospectus offering in Quebec, Canada, from the Quebec Securities Commission and TSX Venture Exchange (TSX) of up to $8,500,000 including $5,590,000 in flow-through shares.  (2) The flow-through offering was completed on August 17, 2006 with a total of $4,300,000 for 4,300,000 flow-through common shares subscribed for and $2,299,000 were obtained from the sale of 2,299,000 units that represented 2,299,000 common shares and 1,149,500 warrants.    -20-  (3) The financing was realized at a price of $1.00 per flow-through share and $1.00 per unit for a total financing in the amount of $6,599,000. Each unit comprises 1 common share and one half of one warrant. Each whole warrant gives the right to its holder to subscribe one common share at the price of $1.25 per share until February 18, 2008.  (4) On August 17, 2006 at the closing of the Initial Public Offering, the Company as part of the agency agreement with Dundee Securities Inc., Canaccord Capital Corporation and Haywood Securities Inc. acting as brokers for the public offering in Quebec, Canada,, has paid brokers fees representing 7% of the total amount obtained in the financing for a sum of $ $461,930 and has issued 461,930 brokers warrants representing 7 % of the number of shares sold in the financing. Dundee Securities Corporation received 230,964 brokers warrants, Canaccord Capital Corporation received 115,483 brokers warrants and Haywood Securities Inc. received 115,483 brokers warrants. Each brokers warrant allowed each broker to acquire one common share at the price of $1.00 per share for a period of 18 months following the closing until February 18, 2008.  (5) On August 3, 2006, Cadiscor received the final visa for a prospectus offering in Quebec, Canada, from the Quebec Securities Commission and TSX Venture Exchange (TSX)to issue 1,000,000 common shares to GéoNova Exploration Inc. as partial consideration of the acquisition of a 100% interest in the Discovery property instead of a payment in cash of $1,000,000 since these shares were qualified by prospectus. See Exhibits 6.1 and 6.2.                         (e) Use of proceeds  The proceeds of the public offering during the period consisting of flow-through proceeds realized in the year 2006, in the amount of $6,599,000. Part of this sum has been used in the last quarter of the period of the following manner: $1,221,707 has been spent on exploration of Discovery, Montbray and Cameron Shear Properties and $487,473 on working capital expenses. The Company anticipates possibly using the proceeds for another project if the results obtained do not justify further expenses and the Company reserves the right to reallocate the use of proceeds as it deems appropriate in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.  The Company conducted during the last quarter of 2006 exploration works on Discovery Property in the amount of $1,217,020 representing 23% ot the issuers net proceeds in the approximate amount of $5,400,000. The Company spent exploration expenses on the Montbray Property in the amount of $1,406 and on the Cameron Shear Property in the amount of $3,281 or less than 5% of the issuers net offering proceeds. A summary of exploration works conducted during this reporting period can be consulted in the sections Report to Shareholders and Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Position in PART 1.  The Company paid payments obtained in the last quarter to independent directors fixed fees for their presence to the Board of Directors Meetings and Audit committee meetings in the amount of $3,800.                          (f) Holders  The Company has no holder of debentures as of March 15, 2007.  As of March 15, 2007, Cadiscors capital stock of 27,674,000 common shares were held by 67 registered shareholders throughout Canada, Of that number 12 are registered holders in the United States and hold together 185,932 common shares or 1% of the capital stock. Of that number of registered holders in the U.S., CEDE & Co, a major trading firm holds 148,235 common shares for an unknown number of residents in the U.S.                         (g) Dividends  The Company has not paid any dividends since its incorporation and does not anticipate as of March 15, 2007, the payment of dividends in the foreseeable future. At present, the Companys policy is to retain earnings, if any, to    -21-  finance exploration on its properties. The payment of dividends in the future will depend upon, among other factors, of the Companys earnings, capital requirements and operating financial conditions.                     (h) Equity compensation plan information as at December 31, 2006  The following table sets out certain details with respect to compensation plans pursuant to which securities of the Company are authorized for issuance:   Plan CategoryNumber of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights
(a)Weighed-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights
(b)Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plan (excluding securities reflected in column (a))Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
 Stock Option Plan2,301,980$0.93457,920Equity compensation plans not approved by security holdersN/AN/AN/ATotal:2,301,980$0.93457,920  Item 6 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation.  (a) Plan of operation  (b) Cadiscor management believes the Company can satisfy its cash requirements until December 2007 in the following manner:  The net proceeds of the Initial Public Offering as defined in section Part II (d) Public offering in Canada after payment of the Brokers Fees but before deduction of the Expenses of Issue, in the amount of $6,137,070 will be allocated as follows:  Amounts allocatedExploration work on the Discovery Property$4,300,000Payment of the balance of the purchase price of the Discovery Property$275,000Reimbursement of advances to Strateco$225,000Expenses of issue$250,000Working capital(1)$1,087,070 (1) The Company will use such funds to pay its overhead, mitigate various unforeseen expenses related to this Initial Public Offering and reserve certain amounts for future acquisition of other mining properties.    -22-  Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.  Nature of the Company  The Company was incorporated under the Canadian Business Corporations Act on March 6, 2006.  Shares of the Company began trading on August 21, 2006. The Company has advised the financial market authorities that the date of its first financial year-end has been changed to December 31, 2006. (See on the SEDAR website at www.sedar.com)  The Company is primarily engaged in the exploration of mining properties with a view to commercial production. The Company owns or has interest in various mining properties in Québec, but does not presently have any properties in production.  Recovery of the cost of mining assets is subject to the discovery of economically recoverable reserves, the Companys ability to obtain the financing required to pursue exploration and development of its properties and profitable future production or the proceeds from the sale of properties.The Company must periodically obtain additional funds to pursue its activities. Its ability to do so in the past is no guarantee of its success in doing so in the future.  Exploration Activities  Exploration expenses for the year 2006 amount to $1,221,707.  Selected Annual Information  December 31, 2006
(9 months) $Income97,175ExpensesGeneral and administrative expenses873,689Net loss683,714Net loss per share, basic and diluted0.025Total assets10,326,070Current liabilities482,081Shareholders equity7,883,889  Operating Results  Cadiscor posted a loss of $683,714 for the year ended December 31, 2006. The Company did not record any sales as none of its properties are in production.  General and administrative expenses to December 31, 2006 were $873,689 and were mainly attributable to stock-based compensation expenses of $508,239, professional fees and legal and audit expenses of $141,904, investor relations expenses of $103,679 and listing and registrar fees of $47,579.  The Company earned $77,175 in interest income and realized a $20,000 gain on the sale of mining right on the Montbray property.  Cadiscor has been a public company since August 3, 2006. Consequently, its financial results cannot be compared to figures for prior periods.   -23- Quarterly Financial Information  The following table contains selected financial information for the last three quarters.  20062nd Quarter *3rd Quarter4th QuarterTotal revenue-$ 26,414$ 70,761Net loss$ 33,758$ 359,802$ 290,154Net loss per share-$ 0.01$ 0.01 *The Company was not in operation during the first quarter and changed its date of fiscal year closing from March 31 to December 31 as reported on Form 8K dated January 4, 2007.  Cash Flow  The Company had working capital of $3,922,110 at December 31, 2006, primarily from the closing of a public offering for total proceeds of $6,599,000 during the year. These funds will be used for the planned 2007 exploration programs as well as for general corporate purposes.  Sources of Financing  On August 17, 2006, management announced the closing of an Initial Public Offering (IPO) for $6,599,000. The IPO included flow-through common shares and units (Units). Each Unit consisted of one common share of Cadiscor and half a warrant, with each whole warrant entitling its holder to subscribe for one common shares of Cadiscor at a price of $1.25 for a period of 18 months following the closing date of the financing. The Unit and flow-through common share were issued at $1.00.  The investment syndicate was led by Dundee Securities Corporation and included Canaccord Capital Inc. and Haywood Securities Inc.  Proceeds of the IPO will primarily be allocated to exploration on the Discovery and other properties. After deducting brokerage, listing and legal fees and repayment of the balance of the Discovery property purchase price, the Company had $4,177,193 in cash at December 31, 2006, of which $3,086,720 was allocated to exploration, including flow-through expenses to be incurred by December 31, 2007.  During the year, the Company issued 6,599,000 common shares for proceeds of $6,599,000. It also issued 1,000,000 common shares at $1.00 per share and 20,000,000 common shares at $0.16 per share for a total of $4,200,172 as consideration for mining properties.  Dividend Policy  The Company has not declared any cash dividend on its outstanding common shares since its inception. Any future dividend payment will depend on the Companys financial requirements for its exploration programs and future growth, as well as any other factor that the Board of Directors may deem necessary under the circumstances. It is unlikely that any dividend will be paid in the near future.  Off Balance-Sheet Arrangements  The Company has no off balance-sheet arrangements.  Risks and Uncertainties  Apart from the risks customarily encountered by exploration stage mining companies, the Companys business is subject to a number of material risks. The following is a brief discussion of all those distinctive or special    -24- characteristics of Cadiscors operations and industry which may constitute risk factors regarding the Companys future financial performance. The Company does not maintain Political Risk Insurance. A portion of the shares of the Company common stock distributed by the Companys former parent were distributed to holders in the United States prior to the Company registration statement under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, becoming effective.  Accordingly, this distribution of approximately 1,367,000 shares of the Company common stock to United States persons may have been in violation of the United States securities laws and the recipients of these shares may have had rescission rights that would have had to be exercised within a statutorily prescribed time period and such rescission rights could have given rise to potential contingent liabilities through the end of this time period.  Strateco Resources Inc., (Strateco) the Company former parent, distributed approximately 20,000,000 shares of the Company common stock to Stratecos shareholders of record as of August 23, 2006. Of these 20,000,000 shares, the Company believes that approximately 1,367,000 shares were distributed to United States persons.  The United States securities laws require that a company may not sell securities to United States persons unless the issuance and sale of the securities have been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), or the sale is exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act.  The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) issued Staff Legal Bulletin No. 4 that provides that shares of a company that are distributed to a parent companys shareholders need not be registered in the United States under the Securities Act provided that five conditions are met.  One of the conditions is that the company that is spun-off must register the spun-off securities under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). The Company filed a registration statement under the Exchange Act on Form 10SB with the SEC on October 6, 2006 and this registration statement became effective on December 5, 2006.  Because the Company shares of common stock were not registered under the Exchange Act 1934 before shares of the Company common stock were distributed to United States persons, the failure of the Company to register prior to the distribution by Strateco of these shares to United States persons may have constituted a violation of Section 5 of the Securities Act, although the Company would vigorously contest any such claim.  A violation of Section 5 of the Securities Act may give rise to a right of rescission for the recipient of such shares.  This right of rescission must be exercised by the person who acquired the shares in a transaction that allegedly violated Section 5 within a specified time period following such alleged violation.  During this time period following the alleged violation of Section 5, the company which offered, sold or delivered the securities allegedly in violation of Section 5 generally must consider the contingent liabilities, if any, that may have arisen from the alleged violation.  The Company has considered its failure to register the shares of common stock issued to United States persons in its spin-off from Strateco, the potential that such failure violated Section 5 of the Securities Act giving rise to a potential claim under Section 12(a)(1) of the Securities Act, the potential rescission rights, if any, that certain Strateco shareholders who received the Company shares in the distribution may have, the time period within which such a Strateco shareholder who received the Company shares would have to make a claim that the distribution of the Company shares violated Section 5 of the Securities Act, any potential defence that the Company may have in connection with any such alleged violation and the Company stock price during the time period following the distributionthrough December 31, 2006. The Company has also considered these potential rescission rights and the potential contingent liabilities that may have existed or may exist as a result thereof.  Exploration and mining risks related to major unforeseen events, availability of personal, and costs of machinery, equipment, operations and compliance with governmental regulations.  The exploration of mining properties is a high-risk industry. Presently, none of the Companys properties or projects have a known body of commercial mineral. Unusual or unexpected formations, formation pressures, fires, power outages, labor disruptions, flooding, explorations, cave-ins, landslides, and the inability to obtain adequate machinery, equipment or labor are all risks involved in the operation of mines and the conduct of exploration programs.  The Company relies on consultants and other professionals for exploration. The Company requires substantial resources to establish reserves, develop metallurgical processes to extract metal from the mineral, and develop mining and processing facilities at a given site.  The cost of developing gold and other mineral properties is affected by the cost of operations, variations in the grade, fluctuations in metal markets and the cost of processing equipment. Government regulations regarding prices, taxes, royalties, allowable production, importing and exporting of minerals, land use, land tenure and environmental protection also affect economic viability. Uncertainties relatedto stage of exploration depends on availability of financing and operating history of the Company.  The Company is a junior natural resource exploration company and has no production revenue.  It does not have an operating history upon which investors may rely. The Company has limited financial resource. The Company must renew constantly its efforts to obtain adequate financing in the future. Failure to obtain such additional financing could result in delay or indefinite postponement of further exploration of its projects. We recognize that we also expect to face the risks, uncertainties, expenses and difficulties frequently encountered by companies at the start up stage of their business development. These risks and uncertainties and the Companys failure to do so could have a materially adverse effect on Companys financial condition.  Variation of Metal Prices  Metal prices have fluctuated widely in recent years, and are affected by numerous factors. International economic and political trends, expectations of inflation, currency exchange fluctuations, interest rates, global or regional consumption patterns, speculative activities and worldwide production levels all may affect metal prices. Gold prices fluctuate on a daily basis and are affected by numerous factors, including: level of interest rates,rate of inflation,central bank sales, andworld supply of gold Each of these factors can cause significant fluctuations in gold prices. Such external factors are in turn influenced by changes in international investment patterns and monetary systems and political developments. Competition with major companies for acquiring properties and qualified employees. The mineral industry is very competitive.  The Company must compete with other companies possessing superior financial resources and technical facilities.  This competition is not only for the acquisition of mining interests, but also for retention of the services of qualified employees. The Company relies presently on skilled consultants and its ability to raise financing to retain them in order to conduct its exploration works.   -25- Titles on mineral properties Although the Company has exercised customary care with respect to determining title to properties in which it has a material interest, title to such properties may be challenged or impugned. The Companys mineral property interests may be subject to prior unregistered agreements, transfers or native land claims and title may be affected by undetected defects. Permits, licenses and Authorizations from governmental authorities need to be obtained and maintained in good standing The Companys current and planned operations require permits and licenses from various governmental authorities. Such permits and licenses are subject to change in regulations and in various operating circumstances. The Company has to obtain or maintain in force all necessary permits and licenses that may be required to conduct exploration or commence construction or operation of mining facilities at properties to be explored or to maintain continued operations at economically justifiable costs. Further, certain of the Companys mineral rights and interests are subject to government approvals.  Price Fluctuations, Share Price Volatility  Securities markets in Canada have experienced a high level of price and volume volatility in recent years, with many resource companies experiencing wide price fluctuations not necessarily related to operating performance or underlying asset values of such companies.  The Companys Common Shares traded between $0.34 and $0.88 between August 21, 2006 and December 31, 2006. Dividends are unlikely in the near future  The Companys board of directors determines whether to pay dividends on the Companys issued and outstanding shares. The declaration of dividends will depend upon the Companys future earnings, its capital requirements, its financial condition and other relevant factors. The Companys board does not intend to declare any dividends on the Companys shares for the foreseeable future. The Company anticipates that it will retain any earnings to finance the growth of its business and for general corporate purposes. Prospective investors seeking or needing dividend income or liquidity should, therefore, not purchase our common stock.  Environmental Regulations All phases of the Companys operations are subject to environmental regulations promulgated by government agencies from time to time.  Environmental legislation is evolving in a manner, which means stricter standards, and enforcement, fines and penalties for non-compliance are more stringent.  Environmental assessments of proposed projects carry a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and directors, officers, and consultants.  Future charges in environmental regulation, if any, may adversely affect the Companys operations. For every exploration project, the Company needs to obtain permits for diamond drilling from the Quebec Ministries of Forestry and Environment. The Company has the obligation under environmental laws to clean and leave the premises according to standards prescribed in the laws. The Company uses no environmentally hazardous chemicals and builds no dams or large structures. The Company believes that it complies with applicable Quebec and Canada environmental laws and regulations.  The Company has obtained all the necessary permits for the exploration works conducted on each of its properties.    -26-  Only exploration and no research as of now  The Company has not conducted any research or development activities since its incorporation nor did Strateco prior to the transfer of Property and Montbray properties to Cadiscor, since only exploration programs have been conducted up to now. Dependence upon management, officers and consultants Taking into consideration that the Companys property is at the underground drilling stage and therefore requires 100% of the management teams time. Management originally in place at the time of incorporation that was composed of the same officers than Strateco has been replaced on June 21, 2006. It was in the best interest of the shareholders of the Company to separate the corporate entities and to focus on exploration of the Companys gold properties with a management  that spends 100% of its time on the business of the Company.  The Companys success depends to a great extent upon the continued successful performance of the president Mr. Michel Bouchard, President since June 21, 2006.. Mr. Bouchard hires consultants and employees in several fields of expertise. The Board of Director has also approved the nomination of a new exploration vice-president for the Company who has entered  in function early December 2006 to assist Mr. Bouchard.  Outlook  Though still young, Cadiscor is developing rapidly, and 2007 looks promising for the Company. With the expected steady rise in the gold price, positive drill results for the Discovery property and the start of exploration by Agnico on the Montbray property and by the Company on Cameron Shear, 2007 should generate plenty of news.  Investor interest is reflected in the performance and liquidity of the Companys shares at year-end. The Company will continue its efforts to make investors aware of Cadiscors potential in 2007.  The excellent drill results on the Discovery property confirm the gold potential of this asset. The first phase of drilling will be completed in March 2007. A new resource calculation is planned for the second quarter, following which a prefeasibility study will be considered to assess Phase II, which consists of an underground bulk sampling program aimed at confirming geological and grade continuity.  The Cameron Shear property covers an eight-kilometre section of the Cameron deformation zone between the Flordin gold deposit to the east and Discovery to the west. The Company has planned a $100,000 exploration program that includes a helicopter-borne magnetometry and electromagnetic survey already conducted in January and February 2007. The anomalies identified will be followed up on the ground in the summer of 2007, and drilling will be planned based on the quality of the targets.  On the Montbray property, Agnico may acquire a 50% undivided interest by carrying out $750,000 in exploration expenditures and making cash payments of $60,000 over four years. A $100,000 exploration program is planned for 2007, with geological compilation work already underway.  In parallel with all these activities, management is assessing other projects on an ongoing basis with a view to building Cadiscors property portfolio.  Information Disclosure Controls and Procedures  The Chief Executive Officer and the person performing similar functions to a Chief Financial Officer are responsible for assessing the effectiveness of information disclosure controls and procedures, and have concluded that such internal controls and procedures are effective and reliable at the end of the period covered by the annual documents.   -27- Additional Information and Continuous Disclosure  This management discussion and analysis is dated March 1, 2007. The Company regularly discloses additional information through filings on the SEDAR (www.sedar.com) and EDGAR (www.sec.gov/edgar.shtml) websites.  Item 7 Financial Statements  The Company incorporates by reference to the present document the Cadiscor Resources Inc. audited financial statements for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006 prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in Canada that  include, U.S. GAAP reconciliation. These financial statements follow the page signature of the present document.  Item 8 Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.  For the year ending December 31, 2006, there has been no change of Accountants and no disagreements with the Auditors, Petrie Raymond LLP.                 Significant employees  The Company hires consultants, professionals and contractors but has no employees. The most significant and permanent consultant in the pursuit of the Companys business is Mr. Michel Bouchard.  The positions held and biographical information for Mr. Bouchard is set forth above in paragraph (a) of ITEM 5 of this report.  Family relationships  There are no family relationships among directors, executive officers or persons chosen to become an executive officer or director with the exception of Mr. Richard Jacques, director, who is the brother in law of Mr. Michel Bouchard, president and director.  (c) Legal proceedings  One of the directors and executive officers mentioned above in ITEM 5 has been involved in the following legal proceedings in the last five years:  1. Mr. Bouchard was Vice-President, Mining Development when McWatters Mines obtained a Court order allowing it to put itself under the CCAA protection on February 14, 2001. On December 11, 2001, the Plan of Arrangement was filed with the Quebec Superior Court. On January 23, 2002, creditors and  shareholders voted in favour of the Arrangement Plan and on January 28, 2002, the Quebec Superior Court ratified it.  Mr. Bouchard was named President on October 1, 2003 and resigned on August 13, 2004. He was a director from February 2004 to his resignation on August 13, 2004.  On January 15, 2004, McWatters Mines announced that it intended to make a proposal to its creditors under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act. The proposal was accepted by the creditors on June 22, 2004. The court ratified it on July 9, 2004.  During that period a Management cease trading order was issued by the Ontario Securities Commission and Quebec Securities Commission on May 26, 2004 and a cease trading order was effective on July 22, 2004 in Quebec, Canada and on July 29, 2004 in Ontario, Canada.  2. None of the directors or executive officers of the Company has been subject to any conviction in a criminal proceeding or is being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);    -28-  3. None of the directors or executive officers of the Company has been subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; and  4. None of the directors or executive officers of the Company has been found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated.  Item 8A. Controls and Procedures  A. Disclosure Controls and Procedures The Companys management, including the Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Michel Bouchard, President and an external consultant Mrs. Pauline Comtois, Canadian General Accountant (CGA) performing functions for the Company similar to a Chief Financial Officer, have conducted an evaluation regarding the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or 240.15d-15(e) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 as amended) as of the end of the period covered by the report, based on the evaluation of these controls and procedures required by paragraph (b) of §240.13a-15 or §240.15d-15,  the Chief Executive Officer and the person performing similar functions to a Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective.  B. Internal Control over Financial Reporting This annual report does not include a report of managements assessment regarding internal control over financial reporting or an attestation report of the companys registered public accounting firm due to a transition period established by rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission for newly public companies. C. Changes in internal control over financial reporting  The Companys management, including the Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Michel Bouchard, President and an external consultant Mrs. Pauline Comtois, Canadian General Accountant (CGA) performing functions for the Company similar to a Chief Financial Officer, did not identify any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of §240.13a-15 or 240.15d-15 of this chapter that occurred during the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting  Item 9 Directors and Executive Officers, Promoters and Control persons; Compliance with section 16 (a) of the Exchange Act.  The Board of Directors consists of six directors who will serve until the next annual meeting and until they are re-elected or their successors will be elected. This annual meeting will be held on June 19, 2007 at 10.30 a.m. at Le Centre Sheraton Montréal Hotel, Lounge 5, 1201 René-Lévesque Blvd. West Montreal, Quebec H3B 2L7, Canada  On November 6, 2006, the Board of directors adopted a Code of ethics. This Code of Ethics can be consulted on the Companys website at www. cadiscor.com. And any interested person can receive copy of this Code of ethics without charge in addressing its request to the Companys head office mentioned on the Title page of this annual report. (a) Directors and executive officers   The mandate of the current directors of the Company will expire at the Annual Meeting of shareholders. Messrs. Bouchard and Hébert dedicates respectively 95% and 5% of their time to the business of the Corporation while the other directors will dedicate less than 5% of their time.  Information on Directors Michel Bouchard has been involved in the exploration, development and production fields of the mining sector for the last 25 years. He was a director of several public companies in the mining sector. He has a BSc and MSc in Geology and an MBA. He is credited for his contribution of the Bouchard-Hebert Mine discovery in north western    -29-  Quebec. He was a Senior Executive for Aiguebelle Resources, Audrey Resources, Lyon Lake Mines, SOQUEM, and McWatters Mines.  Guy Hébert is a director and the president of Strateco Resources Inc. since April 2000. He is the president of BBH Géo-Management Inc. since October 1992. He was also president of Lyon Lake Mines Ltd. from 1986 to 2001 and a director of Orléans Resources Inc. from 1993 to 1998. He was a director and the president and chief executive officer of Altavista Mines Inc. from 1995 to 2000.  Jean-Pierre Lachance is a director and the executive vice-president of Strateco Resources Inc. since April 2000. From 1996 to 2001, he was also vice-president of Lyon Lake Mines Ltd., and he became the executive vice-president of that company in May 1999. He was the president of Novontar S.A., a Costa-Rican corporation, from 1996 to 2002.  Jean-Charles Potvin is a founder of Tiomin Resources Inc. and has been its Chairman of the Board since its inception in 1992. From 1981 until 1994, Mr. Potvin was a Director and Vice-President of Burns Fry Limited (now Nesbitt Burns Inc.) where he evaluated world-wide mining investment opportunities. He has also been involved in securing senior financing for a number of North American gold producers. From 1989 until its acquisition in July 2000 by Barrick Gold Corporation, Mr. Potvin was President and Chief Executive Officer of Pangea Goldfields Inc., which had extensive holdings in Tanzania.  He also serves as a Director of the following publicly traded resource companies: Tiomin Resources Inc., Azimut Exploration Inc., Gobimin Inc., Gold Reserve Inc. and Polaris Geothermal Inc.  Richard Jacques, FCA, is a Management Consultant since 2000. From 1995 to 2000, he was Executive Director of Lavery De Billy, a law firm and was Executive Director of the Quebec Chartered Accountants Order from 1989 to 1995.  Previously, he was, between 1987 to 1989, Vice-President, Finance and Investment of the Quebec Federation of Labour Solidarity Fund and, from 1976 to 1987, Vice-President, Finance for Credit Industriel Desjardins. He is a board member of l'Ordre des travailleurs sociaux.  Guylaine Daigle is Controller of G4 Drilling Ltd., a Val-dOr-based drilling firm, prior to which she worked as Director of Financial Services for Samson Bélair/Deloitte & Touche in Val-DOr.  She was previously Director of Finance for Ross-Finlay 2000 Inc., a Val-dOr mining contractor, and Controller of McWatters Mines Inc., a Val-dOr gold producer.  She has over 12 years of experience in applied accounting management in the mining industry. She replaced on February 19, 2007, another director, Francine Bélanger, deceased in November 2006.  (b) Compliance with section 16 (a) of the Exchange Act .  Section 16 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires the Companys officers and directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of the Companys equity securities, to file reports of ownership on Form 3 and changes in ownership on Form 4 or Form 5 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Such officers and directors and 10% stockholders are also required by SEC rules to furnish the Company with copies of all section 16 (a) forms they file.  The directors and officers filed only with the Quebec Securities Commission now called Autorité des marchés financiers, the principal national securities exchange jurisdiction of the Company as allowed by Rule 16a-3 (c). All transactions by directors and officers have been deposited electronically and can be consulted at http://www.sedi.ca/.  Item 10 Executive Compensation.                          (a) General  During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company did not pay any compensation to its executive officers. During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company incurred general and administrative expenses of $166,000 with BBH Géo-Management Inc. and also paid to it management fees of $96,000, consultant and subcontractor fees of $50,000, and share issue costs of $53,000.   -30-  BBH Géo-Management Inc. is a company that provides the Company with project management and administrative services pursuant to a services agreement. Guy Hébert, the Companys Chairman, is the sole director of BBH Géo Management Inc. and controls another company that is the sole shareholder of BBH Géo-Management Inc. Services provided to the Company by executive officers are paid for by BBH Géo-Management Inc.  Summary Compensation Table Annual remuneration (1)Long-term compensationAwardsPayoutsName and positionYearSalary
$Bonus
$Other annual compensation
$Securities under option / SAR granted
(#)Restricted shares or restricted units
$LTIP Payouts (8)
$All other compensation
$Michel Bouchard(2)President2006___-___Guy Hébert,(3)
Chairman2006___-___Jean-Pierre Lachance(4)2006___-___Vincent Jourdain
Vice-President, Exporation(6)(7)2006- (1) The Company did not pay any salary or other form of compensation directly to its executive officers.  (2) The Company paid in 2006, $119,344 to BBH Géo-Management Inc. for the consulting services of Mr. Bouchard. These sums are not representative of the amounts actually received by Mr. Bouchard from BBH Géo-Management Inc. as salary.  (3) The Company paid in 2006, $21,969 in 2006 to BBH Géo-Management Inc. for the consulting services of Mr. Hébert. These sums are not representative of the amounts actually received by Mr. Hébert from BBH Géo-Management Inc. as salary. (4) Mr. Lachance resigned as Vice-President on December 11, 2006. (6) The Company paid $7,893 in 2006 to BBH Géo-Management Inc. for the consulting services of Mr. Jourdain. These sums are not representative of the amounts actually received by Mr. Jourdain from BBH Géo-Management Inc. as salary. (7) Mr. Jourdain became Vice-President, Exploration on December 11, 2006.  (8) The Company does not have a long-term incentive plan (LTIP).   Liability Insurance  The Company has an insurance policy that provides directors and officers liability coverage of $1,000,000 per event. The Company paid an annual premium of $9,000 for the policy during the financial year.  Termination of Employment, Change in Responsibilities and Employment Contract  There are no employment contracts between the Company and its executive officers, nor is there any compensatory mechanism that may triggered in be the event of a change of control of the Company or a change in executive   -31- officers responsibilities pursuant to a resignation, retirement or any other termination of employment with the Company.  Directors Fees  The directors that are not executive officers receive fees of $400 ($200 if the attendance is by way of a conference call) for each board meeting to which they attend.  Also, the members of the Audit Committee receive fees of $600 ($300 if the attendance is by way of a conference call) for each meeting of the Audit Committee to which they attend. Directors fees totalled $3,800 for the year ended December 31, 2006. Aside from stock options granted under the stock option plan, directors do not receive any other fee or benefit from the Company.  Loans to Director and Officers  As of March 15, 2007, no director, nominee as director or officer or anyone associated with them owed any amount to the Company  Stock Option Plan and Option Grants  The Company has a stock option plan for its executive officers, directors and consultants. A maximum of 10% of the issued and outstanding common shares are reserved for issuance under the plan. The maximum number of options that can be granted to any participant cannot exceed 5% of the issued and outstanding shares of the capital stock. The exercise price of the options granted may not be less than the discounted market price of the common shares on the TSX Venture Exchange at the time the options are granted. The options granted are valid for a period established by the Board of Directors, not to exceed ten years from the date the options are granted. The Company has no stock appreciation rights (SAR) plan. During the financial year ended December 31, 2006, the Company granted 1,420,000 stock options to its executive officers under the terms of the stock option plan, as described in the following table:   NameSecurities under optionPercentage of total options granted to collaborators and consultants in the financial yearExercise price
($)Market value of the securities under option on the eve of the awardExpiryMichel Bouchard
President1,000,00043%1.00$0.485September 10, 2011Guy Hébert
Chairman60,0003%1.00$0.485September 11, 2011Jean-Pierre Lachance,
Vice-President per interim until December 11, 200660,0003%1.00$0.485September 11, 2011Vincent Jourdain
Vice-President, Exploration300,00013%1.00$0.84December 10, 2011 The following table shows the options exercised during the financial year by executive officers and the year-end value of unexercised options at December 31, 2006:   -32-  NameShares acquired on exercise of options
(#)Aggregate value realized ($) (1)Unexercised options at year-end
Exercisable / unexercisableValue of unexercised in-the-money options at year-endExercisable / unexercisableMichel Bouchard001,000,000
N/A.$0N/AGuy Hébert0060,000
N/A.$0N/AJean-Pierre Lachance0060,000
N/A.$0N/AVincent Jourdain00300,000
150,000 / 150,000$0N/A (1) Whenever an option is exercised, the aggregate value realized is the difference between the market value on the date of the exercise of the option and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of shares.                         (b) Stock options granted during the last financial year  During the year ended December 31, 2006, 2,301,980 options were granted. From this number 1,750,000 were granted to directors and officers and 551,980 to consultants.  For further details concerning the stock options granted during the last fiscal year please refer to ITEM 5 (h) and NOTE 7 OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.  Item 11 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management Related Stockholder Matters.       (a) Security ownership of certain beneficial owners  The Company is a publicly traded Canadian corporation, the shares of which are owned by Canadian residents, U.S. residents and other countries residents. The Company is not owned or controlled, directly or indirectly by any foreign government or any other companies. Ownership is based on information furnished to the Company by its Transfer Agent, Computershare Company of Canada. The Company does not know of any person owning more than 5% of any class of the small business issuers voting securities.  Title of className and address of beneficial ownerAmount and nature of beneficial ownership at March 15,2007Percentage of classCommon shares, stock options and controlled shares and warrants to purchase sharesN/AN/AN/A  (b) Security ownership of management  The following table sets forth the names and addresses of each of the directors and officers of the Company, their principal occupations and their respective date of commencement of their term with the Company. All directors and     -33-  officers hold office until the next Annual General Meeting of Shareholders of the Company or until a successor is appointed.  1234Title of className and Position with the CompanyNumber of Common Shares of the Company Beneficially Owned or Directly/Indirectly ControlledPercentage of Issued Share CapitalCommon shares and stock options to purchase common shareMichel Bouchard (6) Québec, Québec 
President and DirectorJune 1, 200641,000 common shares / 1,000,000 stock options0.148%Common shares and stock options to purchase common share.Guy Hébert(3)(6)
Boucherville, Quebec, Canada 
Chairman of the Board and Director, April 1, 20061,105,466 common shares / 60,000 stock options3.995%Common shares and stock options to purchase common shareVincent Jourdain (6)
Val DOr, Québec, Canada,
Officer, Exploration Vice-President December 11, 20060 common share /
300,000 stock options-Common shares and stock options to purchase common shareJean-Pierre Lachance,(6)
St-Hubert, Québec, Canada
Director  April 1, 200671,243 common shares / 60,000 stock options0.257%Common shares and stock options to purchase common shareJean-Charles Potvin(2)(6) Toronto, Ontario, Canada 
DirectorJune 23, 20060 common shares /
60,000 stock options-Common shares and stock options to purchase common shareRichard Jacques(2)F.C.A.
Bromont, Québec, Canada 
Director June 23, 2006r20,000 common shares/ 60,000 stock options0.072%Common shars and stock options to purchase common shareGuylaine Daigle,(2) C.A. Val-DOr, Québec, Director, February, 19, 20070 common shares /
60.000 stock options-TOTAL1,237,709 common shares / 1,600,000 stock options to purchase common share4.472% (1) Information relating to the Shares over which control or direction is exercised was provided by the nominees as of March 15, 2007  (2) Member of the Audit Committee. (3) Includes a total of 59,880 shares and 60,000 stock options held directly by Guy Hébert and 1,045,586 shares and held by one company controlled by Mr. Hébert. (4) The directors, officers and other members of management of the Company, as a group beneficially own, directly or indirectly, common shares of the Company, representing less than 5% of the total issued and outstanding securities of the Company as of March 15, 2007.    -34-  (5) Of the number of common shares mentioned in Column 4 of the preceding table, the directors owned each a number of stock options with right to exercise within 60 days as follows: Mr. Bouchard, 1,000,000; Mr. Lachance, 60,000; Mr. Hébert, 60,000 Mr. Jacques, 60,000, Mr. Jourdain, 150,000, Mr. Potvin, 60,000. (6) As of March 15, 2007, no options were yet exercised  (c) Changes in control  The Company does not anticipate at this time any changes in control of the Company.  Item 12 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.  a) Related parties transactions  The Company has incurred fees and administrative expenses totaling $166,000 and management fees of $96,000, consulting and subcontractor fees of $50,000 and share issue costs of $53,000 under the BBH Management Agreement. The BBH Agreement has a term of one year. Guy Hébert, a director of the Company is the sole director and Executive Officer of BBH Géo-Management Inc. Company management believes that the payments made to BBH Géo-Management Inc. under the BBH Management Agreement are equivalent to the payments that would be made by the Company to an unrelated company.  BBH Géo-Management Inc. provides the following services to the Company under the BBH Management Agreement:  1. Fixed fees of $2,000 Cnd per month for the rent of offices and office equipment. 2. Secretarial personnel 3. Management, accounting and legal services 4. Geological consultants 5. Public relations with investors and regulatory or governmental organism. 6. Research of financing.  The Company acquired from Strateco Resources Inc.  The Discovery and Montbray properties for an amount of $3,425,172 The Company and Strateco Resources Inc. are related as they have directors in common who have considerable influence over each company.  (b) Transactions with Promoters  The Companys common stock at its time of incorporation on March 6, 2006 was entirely owned by Strateco Resources Inc. As described above in  Form 10 SB/A2, Part I, ITEM-DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS (a) Business development of the Registration Statement, the Company acquired all of its assets in connection with the spin-off of Stratecos gold mining operations to Cadiscor.  These assets included the Discovery and Montbray properties formerly held by Strateco in consideration for:  i) 20,000,000 common shares of Cadiscor issued to Strateco at $0.16 per share for a total consideration of $3,200,172; ii) Assumption by Cadiscor of the balance of the purchase price pursuant to the terms of the the GéoNova Agreement; and iii) Reduction of the stated capital of Strateco in the amount of $3,200,172, payable through a pro-rata distribution to Strateco shareholders of the 20,000,000 common shares of Cadiscor held by Strateco.  There was no valuation report prepared by Petrie Raymond other than taking the book value of the properties Discovery and Montbray in the books of Strateco Resources Inc.(Strateco) Montbray has no value since it had been    -35-  written off by Strateco in 2003.  The value if Discovery Porperty was fully explained in section Managements Discussion and Analysis and in Exhibits 6.2 and 6.4 of Form 10/SB/A2.  (c) Conflict of interests  Whenever a director holds functions in another public mining companies or  private companies or whenever a director detains important assets in other public mining companies or private companies, there may exist a situation of conflict of interests between the interest of the Company and this directors own interests. This conflict of interest may appears at the time of negotiation of an agreement or at the time to conclude the mode or scope related to a joint venture with this public mining company or private company. In that case, at the Board of Directors meeting, the director will state on the record that he is in conflict of interests and that director will abstain from discussing and voting on that subject matter.  Joint ventures in acquiring and exploring and mining natural resources are frequent in the Companys industry. According to the laws regarding companies in Quebec, Canada, a director of the Company must act honestly, in good faith and in the fundamental interests of the Company.  As of November 6, 2006, a Code of Ethics has been adopted by the directors and officers of the Company that is posted on the web site of the Company at www.cadiscor.com  that provides for any person that believes that a director or officer does not act in good faith or in the interests of the Company to file a complaint with the Board of Director.  Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K.  a) Exhibits  31.Certifications 32.Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.  b)Reports on Form 8-K.  On January 4, 2007, the Company filed a Form 8K regarding the change of fiscal year closing from March 31 to December 31.  Item 14. Changes in Registrants Certifying Accountant  PETRIE RAYMOND LLP, chartered accountants, from their Montreal office, Quebec, are the Companys auditorssince April 1, 2006and there has not been any changes in and disagreements with auditors on accounting and financial disclosure.  Item 14.  a) Audit Fees  September 30, 2006PETRIE RAYMOND LLP$4,000Annual ReportsPETRIE RAYMOND LLP$15,000  b) Audit-Related Fees  None    -36-  c) Tax Fees  Aggregate fees billed for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning in the last fiscal years for professional services rendered by the principal accountants are as follows:  Year ending at December 31, 2006: $2,000.  d) All other Fees  Accounting organization of the new Company: $13,000.  e) Audit committees pre approval policies and procedures  The Company engages the accountant, to render audit services, once the Companys audit committee has approved the engagement.  With respect to the provision of services other than audit, review or attest services, the pre-approval by the audit committee is waived if the aggregate amount of all such services provided constitutes no more than five percent of the total amount of revenues paid by the Company to its accountant during the fiscal year in which the services areprovided. Such servicesare promptly brought to the attention of the Companys audit committee and approved prior to the completion of the audit by the audit committee or by one or more members of the audit committee who are members of the board of directors to whom authority to grant such approval has been delegated by the audit committee.  SIGNATURE  In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.  CADISCOR RESOURCES INC.  Dated: March 26, 2007   /s/ Michel Bouchard _________________________________ Name: Michel Bouchard Title: President and Chief Executive Officer    -37-              Financial Statements of  CADISCOR RESOURCES INC.  For the year ended December 31, 2006             -38-  Managements Report   The management of the Company is responsible for the preparation of the financial statements and the financial information included in this annual report. Management maintains a system of internal control to produce reliable financial statements and to provide reasonable assurance that assets are safeguarded.  The financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in Canada and necessarily include amounts based on estimates and judgments of management. Petrie Raymond LLP, chartered accountants, were appointed by the shareholders as external auditors of the Company. Their report, presented below, expresses an opinion on the financial statements.  The audit committee meets with the external auditors, with management present, to review the financial statements and to discuss audit-related matters.  On the recommendation of the audit committee, the Board of Directors has approved the Corporations financial statements for 2006.  /s/ Michel Bouchard /s/ Pauline Comtois _________________________ ___________________ Michel Bouchard Pauline Comtois President and Chief Executive Officer Treasurer   Boucherville, Canada March 26, 2007 except for note 14 as of February 11, 2008   -39-    AUDITORSREPORT  To the Directors of Cadiscor Resources Inc.: We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Cadiscor Resources Inc. as at December 31, 2006 and the related statements of deferred expenditures, earnings and deficit and cash flows for the year then ended.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as at December 31, 2006 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles. Canadian generally accepted accounting principles vary in certain respects from the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. [form10ksba231dec06without004.gif]    Limited Liability Partnership Chartered Accountants  Montréal, Canada Date: March 5, 2007 except for note 14 as of February 11, 2008    -40-  BALANCE SHEET DECEMBER 31, 2006  (in Canadian dollars)  ASSETSCURRENT ASSETSCash and cash equivalents (NOTE 3)$4,177,193Account receivable20,000Sales tax recoverable186,065Prepaid expenses20,9334,404,191MINING PROPERTIES (NOTE 4)4,700,172DEFERRED EXPENDITURES (NOTE 5)1,221,707$10,326,070LIABILITIESCURRENT LIABILITIESAccounts payable and accrued charges (NOTE 10)$482,081FUTURE INCOME TAXES (NOTE 11)1,960,100SHAREHOLDERS EQUITYCapital stock  (NOTE 6)8,709,492Contributed surplus  Warrants (NOTE 6)102,872Contributed surplus  Stock options (NOTE 7)508,239Deficit(1,436,714)7,883,889$10,326,070  See notes to financial statements.  ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD (signed) Michel Bouchard (signed) Richard Jacques ____________________________________ ____________________________________ (Signed) Michel Bouchard, Director (Signed) Richard Jacques, Director    -41-  STATEMENT OF DEFERRED EXPENDITURES NINE-MONTH FISCAL PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006  (in Canadian dollars)  EXPLORATION EXPENSESConsultants and subcontractors$877,941Professional fees179,030Management fees99,039Travel expenses26,153Supplies and equipment rental33,002General exploration expenses6,542DEFERRED EXPENDITURES AT END OF YEAR$1,221,707 See notes to financial statements.    -42-  STATEMENT OF DEFERRED EXPENDITURES NINE-MONTH FISCAL PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006  (in Canadian dollars)    REVENUEInterest$77,175Gain on sale of a mining right20,00097,175GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSESProfessional fees76,104Legal and audit expenses65,800Stock-based compensation508,239Directors fees3,800Shareholder communications21,935Investor relations103,679Listing and registrar fees47,579Travel expenses15,603Rent14,000Insurance7,393Office expenses8,474Taxes and permits883Interest and bank charges200873,689LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES776,514FUTURE INCOME TAX BENEFIT (NOTE 11)(92,800)NET LOSS683,714DEFICIT, BEGINNING OF YEAR-RELATED  PARTY TRANSACTION (NOTE 10)753,000DEFICIT, END OF YEAR$1,436,714BASIC AND FULLY DILUTED NET LOSS PER SHARE$0,025WEIGHTED-AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUSTANDING27,599,000  See notes to financial statements.   -43-  STATEMENT OF DEFERRED EXPENDITURES NINE-MONTH FISCAL PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006  (in Canadian dollars)    CASH FLOW FROM (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES:Net loss$(683,714)Non-cash itemsGain on sale of a mining right(20,000)Stock-based compensation508,239Future income tax benefit(92,800)Changes in non-cash working capital items:Sales tax recoverable(186,065)Prepaid expenses(20,933)Accounts payable and accrued charges139,937(355,336)CASH FLOW FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:Acquisition of mining properties (NOTE 4)(500,000)Increase in deferred expenditures(879,563)(1,379,563)CASH FLOW FROM (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES:Share issuance6,599,000Common share issue costs(686,908)5,912,092CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR$4,177,193  Additional information related to cash flowsNon-related cash operating, financing and investing activity items:Cost of future income taxes included in common share issue costs$1,299,000Acquisition of mining properties in exchange for common shares$4,200,172Deferred expenditures included in accounts payable$342,144Common share issue costs paid through the issuance of warrants$102,872  See notes to financial statements.     -44- NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NINE-MONTH FISCAL PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006  (in Canadian dollars)  1. INCORPORATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS  The Company was incorporated under the Canadian Business Corporations Acton March 6, 2006, and is engaged in the exploration of properties.  Recovery of amounts indicated under mining properties and the related deferred expenditures are subject to the discovery of economically recoverable reserves, the Companys ability to obtain the financing required to complete development and profitable future production or the proceeds from the sale of such assets. At December 31, 2006, management determined the net accounting value of mining properties to be the best estimate of their net recoverable value. This value may nonetheless be reduced in the future.  2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES  CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS  The Company considers cash and term deposits maturing within three months of their acquisition date as cash and cash equivalents.  MINING PROPERTIES AND DEFERRED EXPENDITURES  Mining properties are recorded at cost. Exploration and development costs are deferred, net of related government assistance received.  However, when a project is abandoned, the corresponding costs are charged against earnings.  STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION AND OTHER STOCK-BASED PAYMENTS  The Company accounts for the allocation of share purchase options granted under the stock option plan and also accounts for the allocation of broker warrants as part of certain funding on a fair value basis.  Stock options granted to non-salaried persons and broker warrants are accounted for on the basis of their fair value according to the Black-Scholes option price valuation model. When options and broker warrants are granted, the compensation expenses are applied to the activity concerned and the consideration in contributed surplus.  Any consideration paid by the participants when options and broker warrants are exercised, as well as the contributed surplus created when options and broker warrants are allotted, are credited to capital stock.  INCOME TAXES  The Company records its income taxes using the balance sheet method. Future income tax assets and liabilities are recorded to take into account the impact on income taxes of variances between the accounting value of certain assets and liabilities shown on the balance sheet and their respective fiscal values. A valuation allowance is recorded as required to reflect the income tax assets that is more likely to be realized than not. The impact of any changes in income tax rates is recorded in the year in which the rates change.  NET LOSS PER SHARE  The basic and fully diluted loss per share is calculated based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the year.    -45- NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NINE-MONTH FISCAL PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006  (in Canadian dollars)  USE OF ESTIMATES  The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally recognized accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the assets and liabilities reported, amounts related to revenue and expenses, recoverable values for mining property and deferred exploration expenses, environmental liability provisions and the presentation of future liabilities. Actual results could differ from these estimates.  3. CAHS AND CASH EQUIVALENTS  Cash$271,3454,21% Term deposit3,905,8484,177,193  Pursuant to the initial flow-through financing that took place on August 17, 2006, the Company undertook to incur $4,300,000 in exploration expenses before December 31, 2007 for exploration on the Discovery and other gold projects. Of this amount, $1,213,280 had been incurred as at December 31, 2006.  4. MINING PROPERTIES  Discovery and Montbray$4,700,172  At August 17, 2006, the Company acquired the rights on the Discovery and Cameron mining properties (together referred to as Discovery) and Montbray properties from related company Strateco Resources Inc. at a carrying value of $3,425,172 and from GéoNova Explorations Inc. at a fair value of $1,275,000 $ in exchange for: o 20,000,000 common shares of the Company issued to Strateco Resources Inc. (note 10) for the sum of $3,200,172; o 1,000,000 common shares of the Company issued to GéoNova Explorations Inc. for the sum of $1,000,000; and o $225,000 and $275,000 paid in cash to Strateco Resources Inc. and to GéoNova Explorations Inc. respectively. o Agnico-Eagle Option in Montbray  On December 22, 2006, the Company received $20,000 from Agnico-Eagles Mines Limited in relation with the letter of intent signed in November 2006 providing for Agnico to acquire a 50% undivided interest on a Montbray property. 5. DEFERRED EXPENDITURES   Mining properties Exploration Expenses Discovery$1,217,020Montbray1,406Cameron Shear3,281$1,221,707   -46- NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NINE-MONTH FISCAL PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006  (in Canadian dollars)   6. CAPITAL STOCK  AUTHORIZED Unlimited number of common shares without par value.  Unlimited number of preferred shares without par value issuable in series with rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions to be determined by the board of directors.  Common sharesAmountISSUED AND FULLY PAIDIn consideration of mining properties21,000,000$4,200,172In cashFlow-through4,300,0004,300,000Others2,299,0002,299,000Issue costsProfessional fees-(686,908)Warrants awards-(102,872)Future income taxes-(1,299,900)Balance, end of year27,599,000$8,709,492  WARRANTS  In the context of the Initial Public Offering dated August 17, 2006, the Company issued 1,149,500 warrants. The warrants may be exercised at $1.25 per share and expire on February 17, 2008. No warrants were exercised during the year ended December 31, 2006.  During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company granted 461,930 warrants as compensation to Dundee Securities Corporation, Canaccord Capital Corporation and Haywood Securities Inc., who acted as brokers on the public offering.  Each warrant enables its holder to subscribe to one share of the Company at a price of $1.00 per share until February 18, 2008. The fair value of each warrant granted was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. At the date of the grant, the weighted-average fair value of the warrants granted is $0.223 per warrant.  The following weighted-average assumptions were used in the calculations:  Risk-free interest rate2.75%Expected weighted-average life18 monthsExpected Volatility80%Expected dividend0.0% A sum of $102,872 was charged to share issue costs and credited to contribute surplus. At December 31, 2006, 1,611,430 warrants are outstanding and the weighted average strike price of the warrants is $1.18. Each warrants grant to his holder to subscribe to one share of the Company.  -47-  NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NINE-MONTH FISCAL PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006  (in Canadian dollars)    7. STOCK OPTION PLAN  The Company has a stock option plan for its officers, directors, key employees and consultants. A total of 2,759,900 common shares are reserved for issuance under the plan. The maximum number of options that can be granted to any participant cannot exceed 10% of the issued and outstanding shares of the capital stock. The price of the options granted may not be less than the market price of the common shares on the TSX Venture Exchange at the time the options are granted. The options granted are valid for a period established by the board of directors, not to exceed ten years from the date the options are granted.  The stock options outstanding and exercisable as at December 31, 2006 are shown as follows: Options outstandingOptions exercisableWeighted-averageNumberWeighted-averageWeighted-averageNumberstrike priceremaining contractual life (years)strike price$0.70551,9800.39$0.70137,995$1.001,750,0003.69$1.001,600,000$0.932,301,980$0.981,737,995  During the year ended December 31, 2006, 2,301,980 options were granted. From this number 1,750,000 were granted to directors and officers and 551,980 to consultants.  The fair value of each option was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. At the grant date, the weighted average fair value of the options granted was 0.2208 per option.  The following weighted-average assumptions were used in the calculations:  Risk-free interest rate2.84%Expected weighted-average life3 yearsExpected Volatility71%Expected dividend0.0%  An amount of $508,239 was recognized in earnings for the year and credited to contributed surplus.  8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES  Mining Properties On December 19, 2006, the Company signed a letter of intent with Canadian Royalties Inc. to acquire a 50% interest in the Cameron Shear property.  The Company have to issue 75,000 shares to Canadian Royalties Inc. on January 15, 2007, and must incur $1,000,000 in exploration works over five years and make total cash payments of $50,000 over the same period to earn its interest (note 13).  Once it has acquired its 50% interest, the Company may acquire another 10% by financing the entire cost of a bankable feasibility study.    -48-  NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NINE-MONTH FISCAL PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006  (in Canadian dollars)  8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (contd)  Services Agreement  The Company has signed a one-year services agreement dated June 1, 2006 with BBH Géo-Management Inc. (hereinafter called BBH), a related company (note 10).  The agreement provides for BBH to manage the exploration to be carried out by the Company. BBH will charge the Company the expenses and costs for services that include the following:  · Use of BBHs offices and equipment (for a monthly fee of $2,000); · Carrying-out of exploration (including an administration fee of 10% of the exploration expenses); · Management, administration, accounting and legal services; · Consulting services, including in the area of geology; · Relations with investors and the regulatory authorities; and · Financing findings.  The compensation to be paid to BBH is equivalent to the compensation that the Company would otherwise pay to an unrelated third party.  Investor Relations In order to publicize the Company and promote its stock, management and Dresden Capital, a Montreal investor relations firm, signed an agreement providing for $10,000 per month to be paid for services, plus expenses. This agreement ends in August 2007.  9. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS  The Fair value of short-term financial investments is assumed to be equal to book value according to their next maturity and the normal market conditions that they entail.  10. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS  During the year, consulting and subcontractor fees of $50,000 and management fees of $96,000 shown in the statement of deferred expenditures were paid to BBH, an officer of which is also a director of the Company and of which Michel Bouchard, the president of the Company, is an employee since June 21, 2006.  General and administrative expenses of $166,000 included in the results and share issue costs of $53,000 were paid to the same company.  At December 31, 2006, accounts payable and accrued charges included an amount of $92,000 to be paid to the same company.  The Company acquired from Strateco Resources Inc. the Discovery and Montbray properties for an amount of $3,425,172 (note 4).  The Company and Strateco Resources Inc. are related as they have directors in common who have considerable influence over each company.  Following this operation, a future income tax expense of $753,000 was debited to deficit.    -49-  NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NINE-MONTH FISCAL PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006  (in Canadian dollars)   11. INCOME TAXES  The income tax allowance differs from the amount resulting from the application of the combined Canadian statutory income tax rate as follows:  Loss before income taxes$(776,514)Combined Canadian statutory income tax rate30.23%Income tax benefit on the combined Canadian income tax rate(234,740)Share issue costs(8,479)Stock-based compensation153,641Non-deductible expenses(3,222)Future income tax benefit$(92,800)  The combined Canadian statutory income tax rate of 30.23% consists of a federal tax rate of 22.12% and a provincial rate of 8.11%.  The tax effects of temporary differences giving rise to material future income tax assets and liabilities as at December 31, 2006 are as follows:  Future income tax assets:Net operating losses$89,400Financial expenses33,900Total future income tax assets123,300Future income tax liabilities:Mining properties and deferred expenditures2,083,400Future income tax liabilities$1,960,100    -50-  NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NINE-MONTH FISCAL PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006  (in Canadian dollars)   11. INCOME TAXES (CONTD)  At December 31, 2006, the Company had unused non-capital losses and share issue costs that could be deferred to future years and used to reduce future taxable income. The losses and share issue costs expire as follows:  FederalProvincialNon-capital loss:2026$295,463$295,463Share issue costs:2007$28,048$28,0482008$28,048$28,0482009$28,048$28,0482010$28,049$28,049  12. CONTINGENT LIABILITIES  The Company is subject to governmental laws regarding environmental protection.  Environmental consequences resulting from the Companys operations are not easily identifiable.  To the best of managements knowledge, the Company is presently in compliance with the laws and regulations currently in force and no provision for site restoration has been recorded in the accounts.  13. EVENTS SUBSEQUENT TO THE DATE OF THE BALANCE SHEET  On January 15, 2007, the Company issued 75,000 common shares of its capital stock to Canadian Royalties Inc. at $0.78 per common share to acquire a 50% interest in the Cameron Shear gold property, pursuant to the agreement dated December 19, 2006 (Note 8).  14. THE EFFECT OF APPLYING UNITED STATES ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES  These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in Canada. The effect of applying United States generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) on net earnings would be as follows:    -51-  2006Net loss per Canadian GAAP, as reported$683,714Deferred expenditures (1)1,221,707Deferred tax expenses (recovery)(2)(109,195)Net loss and comprehensive income for the year,
according to U.S. GAAP$1,796,226Net loss per share per Canadian GAAP, as reported$0.03Effect of adjustments:Deferred expenditures (1)$0.04Deferred tax expenses (recovery) (2)0.00Loss per share, according to U.S. GAAP$0.07  (1) Properties and deferred expenditures are accounted for in accordance with Canadian GAAP as disclosed in note 2. Under Canadian GAAP, the propertys potential for development is sufficient to permit the capitalization of exploration expenditures incurred as property acquisition costs and deferred expenditures and the management intends to pursue the development. Under U.S. GAAP, the Companys mineral rights are accounted for as tangible assets.  The Company conducts periodic impairment testing on mining properties and mineral rights and has concluded that there is no impairment on these assets.  The Company intends to continue exploratory tests on these properties.  For U.S. GAAP financial recording, the costs of drilling exploratory and exploratory-type stratigraphic test wells are initially capitalized, pending determination of whether the well can produce proved reserves. If it is determined the well will not produce proved reserves, the capitalized costs, net of any salvage value, are charged to expense.  As of December 31, 2006 the deferred exploratory costs did not provide evidence of proven reserves and accordingly, the deferred exploration costs were expensed.  (2) Under Canadian GAAP, shares issued as flow-through shares are recorded at their face value when issued. When the entity acquires assets the carrying value may exceed the tax basis as a result of the enterprise renouncing the deductions to the investors. The tax effect of the temporary difference is recorded as a share issue cost. Under US GAAP, the proceeds from issuance should be allocated between the offering of shares and the sale of tax benefits. The allocation is made based on the difference between the quoted price of the existing shares and the amount the investor pays for the shares. A liability is recognized for this difference. The liability is reversed when tax benefits are renounced and a deferred tax liability is recognized at that time. Income tax expense is the difference between the amount of the deferred tax liability and the liability recognized on issuance.  The effect of the application of the above adjustments on the balance sheet of the Company at December 31, 2006 would be to decrease properties by $4,387,422 to $312,750 decrease deferred expenditures by $1,221,707 to $0 increase long-term liability by $277,805 and decrease shareholders equity by $5,886,934  There would be no net effect on the operating, investing or financing sections of the statement of cash flows.