alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
5219.804-1 Agency evaluation.

(f) Agency reviews, in addition to the factors in FAR 19.803(a), may take the form of a technical

presentation or should be structured in a manner that affords an exchange of information between

the 8(a) firm and the contracting activity that will provide the 8(a) firm an adequate opportunity to

demonstrate its capability and capacity to perform the requirement. For sole source 8(a) contracts,

SBA regulations preclude the use of formal technical evaluations. Contracting officers, however, may

conduct informal assessments of several 8(a) firms' capabilities to perform a specific requirement.

(S-90) When a lack of capability or capacity forms the basis for declination responses to SBA, such

responses shall discuss factors such as the 8(a) contractor candidate's:

(1) lack of knowledge and understanding of the work to be performed;

(2) lack of experience in performing requirements of similar size and scope;

(3) lack of resources that are available (including contingent hires) or that must be acquired for

contract performance;

(4) lack of ability to comply with subcontracting limitation provisions (see FAR clause 52.219-14);

(5) lack of ability to meet delivery schedules; and/or

(6) deficiencies in record of performance.

Contracting activities shall provide a copy of all 8(a) program declination letters to the Director,

OSBP concurrent with submission to SBA. Declination letters are subject to direct appeal by the SBA

Administrator to the Secretary of the Navy (see FAR 19.810). Contracting officers should coordinate

such declinations with the activity small business specialist or the CCO.

Parent topic: 5219.804 Evaluation, offering, and acceptance.
Case 1:06-cv-00671-WHA-SRW Document 4 Filed 09/28/2006 Page 1 of 1
42.1503 Procedures.    (a)(1)(i) Past performance assessments are a combined responsibility of the Assessing Official (AO) Assessing Official Representative (AOR), Reviewing Official (RO), and Contractor Representative (CR).       (a)(1)(ii) The contracting officer shall be assigned as the AO. The RO is at least a level above the AO. The contracting officer and Focal Point (PSD Contract Specialist) appoint AORs (Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) or Program Office Representatives) to assist the AO with writing the evaluation. If the AOR is the COR, the AOR designation shall be included in the COR appointment letter. **Parent topic:** SUBPART 42.15 — CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
§ 905.41 Assessments. ( a ) Each handler who first handles fruit shall pay to committee, upon demand, such handler's pro rata share of the expenses which the Secretary finds will be incurred by the committee for the maintenance and functioning, during each fiscal period, of the committee established under this subpart. Each such handler's share of such expenses shall be that proportion thereof which the total quantity of fruit shipped by such handler as the first handler thereof during the applicable fiscal period is of the total quantity of fruit so shipped by all handlers during the same fiscal period. The Secretary shall fix the rate of assessment per standard packed carton of fruit to be paid by each such handler. The payment of assessments for the maintenance and functioning of the committee may be required under this part throughout the period it is in effect irrespective of whether particular provisions thereof are suspended or become inoperative.
( b ) At any time during or after the fiscal period, the Secretary may increase the rate of assessment so that the sum of money collected pursuant to the provisions of this section shall be adequate to cover the said expenses. Such increase shall be applicable to all fruit shipped during the given fiscal period. In order to provide funds to carry out the functions of the committee established under § 905.19, handlers may make advance payment of assessments.
( c ) In the case of an extreme emergency, the committee may borrow money on a short-term basis to provide funds for the administration of this part. Any such borrowed money shall only be used to meet the committee's current financial obligations, and the committee shall repay all such borrowed money by the end of the next fiscal period from assessment income.
[22 FR 10734, Dec. 27, 1957. Redesignated at 26 FR 12751, Dec. 30, 1961, as amended at 42 FR 59370, Nov. 17, 1977; 54 FR 37293, Sept. 8, 1989; 88 FR 82232, Nov. 24, 2023]
§ 772.2 Abbreviations and Definitions. ( a ) *Abbreviations.* *AMP* Association-Type Minor Program loan; *CFR* Code of Federal Regulations; *FO* Farm Ownership Loan; *FSA* Farm Service Agency; *IMP* Individual-Type Minor Program loan; *OL* Operating Loan; *USDA* United States Department of Agriculture.
( b ) *Definitions.* *Association-Type Minor Program loans (AMP):* Loans to Grazing Associations and Irrigation and Drainage Associations.
*Entity:* Cooperative, corporation, partnership, joint operation, trust, or limited liability company.
*Graduation:* The requirement contained in loan documents that borrowers pay their FSA loan in full with funds received from a commercial lending source as a result of improvement in their financial condition.
*Individual-type Minor Program loans (IMP):* Non-Farm Enterprise or Recreation loans to individuals.
*Member:* Any individual who has an ownership interest in the entity which has received the Minor Program loan.
*Minor Program:* Non-Farm Enterprise, Individual Recreation, Grazing Association, or Irrigation and Drainage loan programs administered or to be administered by FSA
*Review official:* An agency employee, contractor or designee who is authorized to conduct a compliance review of a Minor Program borrower under this part.
**EXHIBIT 13.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

The undersigned, Paul Uppal, Director, Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer, and Secretary of Liberty Petroleum Inc. (the “Company”), certify, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and  results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated: June 12, 2007

 

| By: | /s/ Paul Uppal |
|-----|----------------|

| Name: | Paul Uppal |
|-------|------------|

Title:  Director, Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer, and Secretary

|   | (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

44
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

FRANK BLAIR, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

AETNA LIFE INSURANCE 

COMPANY, AMERICOLD 

LOGISTICS, LLC, DAWN 

SANFORD, et al., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CIVIL ACTION NUMBER 

2:06-cv-651 

NOTICE TO COURT OF SETTLEMENT

COMES NOW Plaintiff Frank Blair and Defendants Aetna Life Insurance 

Company, Americold Logistics LLC, and Dawn Sanford, by and through 

undersigned counsel, and respectfully notify the Court that they have reached a 

tentative settlement of this matter. The parties are in the process of finalizing 

settlement and, upon doing so, will file a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal. In the 

meantime, the parties wanted to keep the Court apprized of the status of this matter 

and wanted to inform the Court that they will not be submitting a proposed Rule 

26(f) discovery plan per this Court’s November 28, 2007 Order (Doc. 15). 

Case 2:06-cv-00651-MEF-SRW Document 20 Filed 12/27/2007 Page 1 of 3
2

s/Amelia T. Driscoll 

Amelia T. Driscoll 

James S. Christie, Jr. 

One Federal Place 

Bradley Arant Rose & White LLP

1819 Fifth Avenue North 

Birmingham, AL 35203-2104 

Telephone: (205) 521-8000 

Facsimile: (205) 521-8800 

jchristie@bradleyarant.com

adriscoll@bradleyarant.com 

Attorneys for Defendants 

s/Ralph Bohanan, Jr. 

Ralph Bohanan, Jr. 

Bohanan & Knight, P.C. 

Suite 318 North 

Birmingham, Alabama 35243 

ralphb@bohananknight.com

Attorney for Plaintiff 

Case 2:06-cv-00651-MEF-SRW Document 20 Filed 12/27/2007 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 

 I hereby certify that on December 27, 2007, I electronically filed the 

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send 

notification of such filing to the following: 

 

Ralph Bohanan, Jr. 

Bohanan & Knight, P.C. 

Suite 318 North 

Birmingham, Alabama 35243 

ralphb@bohananknight.com 

and I hereby certify that I have mailed by United States Postal Service on this 27th 

day of December, 2007 the document to the following non-CM/ECF participants: 

 None. 

 

 s/Amelia T. Driscoll 

Amelia T. Driscoll 

One Federal Place 

Bradley Arant Rose & White LLP

1819 Fifth Avenue North 

Birmingham, AL 35203-2104 

Telephone: (205) 521-8000 

Facsimile: (205) 521-8800 

One of the Attorneys for Defendants 

Case 2:06-cv-00651-MEF-SRW Document 20 Filed 12/27/2007 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 33.2

[LOGO] 21 S.E. Third Street o P.O. Box 868 o Evansville, Indiana 47705-0868 o
       integrabank.com


                    REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH
                        REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

Integra Bank Corporation (the "Asserting Party") is responsible for assessing
compliance as of December 31, 2006 and for the period from January 1, 2006
through December 31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period") with the servicing criteria
set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's
Regulation AB, except for criteria 229.1122(d)(1)(i)-(iv), (2)(ii)-(vii),
(3)(i)-(iv), (4)(i)-(iii), and (4)(v)-(xv), which the Asserting Party has
concluded are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the
asset-backed securities transactions covered by this report (such criteria,
after giving effect to the exceptions identified above, the "Applicable
Servicing Criteria"). With respect to Item 1122(d)(4)(iv), the Asserting Party's
responsibility is limited to the timely delivery of payments to the primary
servicer, First Data Resources, and the Asserting Party does not take
responsibility for the posting of payments by the primary servicer, First Data
Resources. The transactions covered by this report include the asset-backed
securities transactions for which the Asserting Party served as a servicer that
are backed by the same asset type backing the asset-backed securities
transactions completed by IndyMac ABS, Inc. and IndyMac Home Equity Mortgage
Loan Asset-Backed Trust, that were completed on or after January 1, 2006 and
that were registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the
Securities Act of 1933 where the asset-backed securities were outstanding during
the year ended December 31, 2006 including IndyMac Home Equity Mortgage Loan
Asset-Backed Trust (Series 2006-H1, 2006-H2, 2006-H3, and 2006-H4, herein
referred to as "the Platform").

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has
complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of
December 31, 2006 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform
transactions taken as a whole.

Crowe Chizek and Company LLC, an independent registered public accounting firm,
has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2006 and for the Reporting
Period as set forth in this assertion.

Integra Bank Corporation

February 26, 2007

By: /s/ Beth A. Clark
   -----------------------
Name: Beth A. Clark
     ---------------------
Title: S.V.P.
      --------------------
Part 5134 - Major System Acquisition       Subpart 5134.0 - General                                                         5134.003 Responsibilities.                                                                             Subpart 5134.2 - Earned Value Management System                                                         Subpart 5134.70 - Acquisition of Major Weapon Systems as Commercial Items                                                            5134.7002 Policy.    Subpart 5134.0 - General     5134.003 Responsibilities.    See Army Regulation 70-1, Army Acquisition Policy.Subpart 5134.2 - Earned Value Management System    See Army Class Deviation, Approval of Class Deviation from the Earned Value Management System Requirements of the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement for Certain Fixed-Price Incentive (Firm Target) (FPIF) Contracts, dated 6 December 2015. This class deviation allows a deviation from the Earned Value Management System (EVMS) requirements prescribed in DFARS 234.2 and associated DFARS clauses 252.234-7001 and 252.234-7002.  The class deviation applies to FPIF contracts for full rate production (FRP) subsequent to the first FRP lot, in support of Defense acquisition programs, supporting services contracts where work is not measurable and discrete, and contracts for non-developmental services not supporting a Defense acquisition program. This deviation is effective until incorporated in the DFARS or rescinded.       See Army Class Deviation             , Approval of Class Deviation from the Earned Value Management System Requirements of the DFARS for Requirements with an Approved Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 5000.02 Earned Value Management Applicability Determination or Waiver.                                            This class deviation applies when a DoDI 5000.02 EVM applicability determination finds that EVM is not applicable or an EVM waiver has been executed by the designated officials. Subpart 5134.70 - Acquisition of Major Weapon Systems as Commercial Items5134.7002 Policy.    (d)(4)  The head of the contracting activity shall make the determination under DFARS 234.7002(d)(4).  See Appendix GG for further delegation.
162 So.2d 572

#### Jules CHENEVERT v. Peter J. LEMOINE.

No. 47192.

April 17, 1964.

In re: Peter J. Lemoine applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Avoyelles. 161 So.2d 85.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal there is no error of law in the judgment complained of.
#### Long Island Region National Association for the Advancement of Colored People et al., Appellants, v Town of North Hempstead et al., Respondents.

In an action to declare, *inter alia,*that the defendants have a duty to provide a plan for the development of a balanced community which meets the present and future housing needs of those plaintiffs who are low income, elderly and minority residents of the community, plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated December 18, 1979, as, upon defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaint, (1) directed that an amended complaint be served "limiting itself to the necessary factual allegations” and eliminating certain other material, and (2) granted the motion to dismiss of the defendant North Hempstead *843Housing Authority. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. Plaintiffs’ time to serve an amended complaint is extended until 20 days after service upon them of a copy of the order to be made hereon, together with notice of entry thereof. In addition to holding that plaintiffs had standing to bring the action, Special Term denied dismissal of the complaint (except as to the North Hempstead Housing Authority) on the ground that a cause of action was made out to invalidate the defendant town’s zoning law. The court’s additional direction that an amended pleading be served limiting itself to the necessary factual allegations is simply requiring plaintiffs to follow good practice and to draw a complaint that is clear and concise on the claim stated. To proceed on the cause of action as the complaint is now drawn would be prejudicial. Whatever evidentiary facts relating to the "turnkey” projects are relevant to prove the cause of action may, of course, be introduced upon the trial. Cohalan, J. P., Margett, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur. [102 Misc 2d 704.]
§ 772.13 Delinquent account servicing. ( a ) *AMP loans.* If the borrower does not make arrangements to cure the default after notice by the Agency and is not eligible for reamortization in accordance with § 772.14, the Agency will liquidate the account in accordance with § 772.16. Delinquent AMP loans will be serviced in accordance with part 761, subpart F of this chapter and part 3 of this title.
( b ) *IMP loans.* Delinquent IMP loans will be serviced in accordance with part 761, subpart F of this chapter and part 3 of this title.
[85 FR 36713, June 17, 2020]
#### § 906.27 Alternate members.

An alternate member of the committee shall act in the place and stead of the member for whom he is an alternate, during such member's absence or when designated to do so by the member for whom he is an alternate. In the event both a member and his alternate are unable to attend a committee meeting, the committee members present may designate another alternate of the same classification (handler or producer, and to the extent practical, independent, or co-op) to serve in such member's place and stead. In the event of the death, removal, resignation, or disqualification of a member, his alternate shall act for him until a successor of such member is selected and has qualified.

[31 FR 10462, Aug. 4, 1966]
§ 766.154 Homestead Protection leases. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) The Agency may approve a lease-purchase agreement on the appropriate Agency form subject to obtaining title to the property.
( 2 ) If a third party obtains title to the property: ( i ) The applicant and the property are no longer eligible for homestead protection;
( ii ) The Agency will not implement any outstanding lease-purchase agreement.
( 3 ) The borrower may request homestead protection for property subject to third party redemption rights. In such case, homestead protection will not begin until the Agency obtains title to the property.
( b ) *Lease terms and conditions.* ( 1 ) The amount of rent will be based on equivalent rents charged for similar residential properties in the area in which the dwelling is located.
( 2 ) All leases will include an option to purchase the homestead protection property as described in paragraph (c) of this section.
( 3 ) The lease term will not be less than 3 years and will not exceed 5 years.
( 4 ) The lessee must agree to make lease payments on time and maintain the property.
( 5 ) The lessee must cooperate with Agency efforts to sell the remaining portion of the farm.
( c ) *Lease-purchase options.* ( 1 ) The lessee may exercise in writing the purchase option and complete the homestead protection purchase at any time prior to the expiration of the lease provided all lease payments are current.
( 2 ) If the lessee is a member of a socially disadvantaged group, the lessee may designate a member of the lessee's immediate family (that is, parent, sibling, or child) (designee) as having the right to exercise the option to purchase.
( 3 ) The purchase price is the market value of the property when the option is exercised as determined by a current appraisal obtained by the Agency.
( 4 ) The lessee or designee may purchase homestead protection property with cash or other credit source.
( 5 ) The lessee or designee may receive Agency program or non-program financing provided: ( i ) The lessee or designee has not received previous debt forgiveness;
( ii ) The Agency has funds available to finance the purchase of homestead protection property;
( iii ) The lessee or designee demonstrates an ability to repay such an FLP loan; and
( iv ) The lessee or designee is otherwise eligible for the FLP loan.
( d ) *Lease terminations.* The Agency may terminate the lease if the lessee does not cure any lease defaults within 30 days of Agency notification.
( e ) *Appraisal of homestead protection property.* The Agency will use an appraisal obtained within six months from the date of the application for considering homestead protection. If a current appraisal does not exist, the applicant will select an independent real estate appraiser from a list of appraisers approved by the Agency.
[72 FR 63316, Nov. 8, 2007, as amended at 76 FR 5058, Jan. 28, 2011]
#### § 795.21 Appeals.

Any person may obtain reconsideration and review of determinations made under this part in accordance with the appeal regulations, part 780 of this chapter, as amended.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2734 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Pigment Blue 80. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 4, 2006 

Mr. REED (for himself and Mr. CHAFEE) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Pigment Blue 80. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PIGMENT BLUE 80. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.09.81 Pigment Blue 80 (provided 

for in subheading 

3204.17.60) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC72 with BILLS
2 

•S 2734 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC72 with BILLS
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

MAXIE MCNABB, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv664-MHT

)

SANDERS LEAD COMPANY, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

CORPORATE/CONFLICT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

In accordance with the order of the court, the undersigned parties to the above

captioned matter do hereby make the following disclosure concerning parent companies,

subsidiaries, affiliates, partnerships, joint ventures, debtor, creditors’ committee, or other

entities reportable under the provisions of the Middle District of Alabama’s General Order

No. 3047:

There are no entities to be reported.

Respectfully submitted this the 17th day of April, 2007.

s/ Grady A. Reeves 

Grady A. Reeves (REE042)

N.J. Cervera (CER001)

Frank P. Ralph (RAL002)

Matthew M. Baker (BAK017)

Counsel for Sanders Lead Company, Inc.

OF COUNSEL:

CERVERA, RALPH, & REEVES, LLC

914 South Brundidge Street

P.O. Box 325

Troy, Alabama 36081

phone (334) 566-0116

fax (334) 566-4073

Case 2:06-cv-00664-MHT-SRW Document 8 Filed 04/17/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on April 17th, 2007, the foregoing was electronically filed with the

Clerk of the Court, using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to

the following registered persons:

Roderick T. Cooks, Esq.

WINSTON COOKS, LLC

The Penick Building

319 17th Street North

Birmingham, Alabama 35203

this the 17th day of April, 2007.

s/ Grady A. Reeves 

OF COUNSEL

Case 2:06-cv-00664-MHT-SRW Document 8 Filed 04/17/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00650-MEF-SRW Document 2 Filed 07/21/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00650-MEF-SRW Document 2 Filed 07/21/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00650-MEF-SRW Document 2 Filed 07/21/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00650-MEF-SRW Document 2 Filed 07/21/2006 Page 4 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00662-MEF-CSC Document 7 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00662-MEF-CSC Document 7 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00662-MEF-CSC Document 7 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 3 of 3