alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
01529024.1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

HAROLD KELLY MURPHY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Case No.: 2:06-cv-618-MEF

)

SOUTHERN ENERGY HOMES, INC., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUR-REPLY IN SUPPORT OF

MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

COMES NOW Defendant Southern Energy Homes, Inc. (“Southern Energy”) and

hereby seeks leave of this Court to file the attached Sur-Reply in Support of its Motion

for Judgment on the Pleadings. In support of this motion, Southern Energy hereby states

as follows:

1. Southern Energy has previously submitted to this Honorable Court, in

support of its Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, an Order from the United States

District Court for Western District of Louisiana in Guidroz v. Champion Enterprises,

Inc., granting Defendants’ Rule 12(b) Motion to Dismiss on the exact same preemption

grounds that Southern Energy seeks for this Court to dismiss the Complaint in the case at

bar.

2. Last week, Plaintiff Harold Murphy filed a Motion for Leave to Amend

[Its Opposition to the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings], seeking permission to

submit to this Court an August 1, 2007 Minutes of Hearing and Order from the Guidroz

Court.

Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 60-2 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 1 of 3
01529024.1 2

3. Because Southern Energy believes that Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave

misconstrues the substance, scope, and effect of the Guidroz Court’s August 1

st Minutes

of Hearing and Order, Southern Energy seeks leave to file the attached Sur-Reply.

4. The Sur-Reply very briefly sets forth the proper context of the recent

Guidroz order and demonstrates why the Guidroz Court’s rulings in fact support Southern

Energy’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings.

WHEREFORE, Defendant Southern Energy Homes, Inc. hereby respectfully

requests the opportunity to file the attached Sur-Reply in support of its Motion for

Judgment on Pleadings.

_s/Thomas W. Thagard III ______________

Lee E. Bains, Jr. (BAI005)

Thomas W. Thagard, III (THA006)

Edward S. Sledge IV (SLE008)

Attorneys for Southern Energy Homes, Inc.

OF COUNSEL:

MAYNARD, COOPER & GALE, P.C.

1901 Sixth Avenue North

2400 AmSouth/Harbert Plaza

Birmingham, AL 35203

(205) 254-1000 (Telephone)

(205) 254-1999 (Facsimile)

lbains@maynardcooper.com

tthagard@maynardcooper.com

sledge@maynardcooper.com

W. Scott Simpson

RITCHEY & SIMPSON, PLLC

3288 Morgan Drive, Suite 100

Birmingham, Alabama 35216-3084

205.876.1600 (Telephone)

205.876.1616 (Facsimile)

wssimpson@ritcheysimpson.com

Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 60-2 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 2 of 3
01529024.1 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 15th, 2007 I electronically filed the foregoing with

the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such

filing to the following:

Charles Lance Gould, Esq.

s/Thomas W. Thagard III

Of Counsel

Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 60-2 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 3 of 3
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3072 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3072

    To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Ethyl pyruvate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

 Mr. Sessions introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Ethyl pyruvate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ETHYL PYRUVATE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.48 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Ethyl pyruvate) is amended 
by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 58.519 Dairy products. ( a ) *Raw skim milk.* All raw skim milk obtained from a secondary source shall be separated from milk meeting the same quality requirements for milk as outlined in § 58.518 above. Skim milk after being pasteurized and separated shall be cooled to 45 °F. or lower unless the skim milk is to be set for cheese within two hours after pasteurizing. The skim milk should not be more than 48 hours old from the time the milk was received at the plant and the skim milk is set for cheese.
( b ) *Nonfat dry milk.* Nonfat dry milk, when used, shall be obtained from milk meeting the same quality requirements as outlined in § 58.518 above. It shall be processed according to the requirements of this Subpart, and should meet the requirements of § 58.236(b)(3).
( c ) *Condensed skim milk.* Condensed skim milk, if used, shall be prepared from raw milk or skim milk that meets the same quality requirements outlined above for raw milk or skim milk. It shall be cooled promptly after drawing from the vacuum pan or evaporator and shall have been pasteurized before concentrating or during the manufacture. The standard plate count of the concentrated milk shall not exceed 30,000 per ml. at time of use.
( d ) *Cream.* Any cream used for preparing the dressing for creamed cottage cheese shall be separated from milk meeting at least the same quality requirements as the skim milk used for making the curd. The flavor of the cream shall be fresh and sweet. Cream obtained from a secondary source shall meet the same requirements. The creaming mixture prepared from this cream, after pasteurization, shall have a standard plate count of no more than 30,000 per ml.
## Metallurgy Division Publications

----

Publications on this page are available in Adobe portable document format (PDF).You may obtain the free  Acrobat Reader to view this content.

----

> Annual Reports:- Metallurgy Division: FY2004 Programs and Accomplishments
- NISTIR 7127: Annual Report 2004  in Adobe Acrobat PDF (4.2 MB) 	 
Recommended Practices Guides:- NISTSP 960-5: Rockwell Hardness Measurement of Metallic Materials  in Adobe Acrobat PDF (2.8 MB) 		  
NIST Internal Reports:- NISTIR 6927: Databases for Computational Thermodynamics and Diffusion Modeling Workshop Report  in Adobe Acrobat PDF (19.2 MB)		  
- NISTIR 6776: Thermal Spray Process Reliability  in Adobe Acrobat PDF (17.4 MB)		  
- NISTIR 6460: Thermal Spray Coatings Workshop  in Adobe Acrobat PDF (7.2 MB)		  
- NISTIR 6118: Metallurgy of the RMS Titanic  in Adobe Acrobat PDF (6 MB)		  
- NISTIR 4497: The Prediction of Elevated Temperature Deformation of Structural Steel Under Anisothermal Conditions  in Adobe Acrobat PDF (1.1 MB)		  
Workshops/Conferences:- NISTIR 6776: Thermal Spray Process Reliability Workshop
- NISTIR 6460: Thermal Spray Coatings Workshop
- NIST/LLNL Work Hardening and Dislocation Patterning Workshop
NIST Published Papers:- The Formation of Whiskers on Electroplated Tin Containing Copper  in Adobe Acrobat PDF (2.1 MB) 		    Previous Annual Reports:    - NISTIR 7017: Annual Report 2003  in Adobe Acrobat PDF (3.2 MB) 	 
  - NISTIR 6907: Annual Report 2002  in Adobe Acrobat PDF (3.8 MB) 	 
  - NISTIR 6797: Annual Report 2001  in Adobe Acrobat PDF (1.9 MB) 	 
  - NISTIR 6597: Annual Report 2000  in Adobe Acrobat PDF (6.6 MB) 	 
  - NISTIR 6436: Annual Report 1999  in Adobe Acrobat PDF (0.3 MB) 	 
  - NISTIR 6250: Annual Report 1998  in Adobe Acrobat PDF (0.4 MB) 	 
  - NISTIR 6066: Annual Report 1997  in Adobe Acrobat PDF (0.7 MB) 	 
  - NISTIR 5965: Annual Report 1996  in Adobe Acrobat PDF (0.4 MB) 	 
  - NISTIR 5750: Annual Report 1995  NIST Pre-prints:     **Metallurgy Division of MSEL** | metallurgy@nist.govHome | Mission | History |          Research Programs | Research Groups | Publications | Personnel |Research Opportunities | Facilities | NIST Staff Only | Search           | Outside LinksThe National Institute of Standards and Technology is an agency           of the U.S. Commerce DepartmentTechnology          Administration  	Last modified: 		   Tuesday, 12 October, 2004 	by 	*Metallurgy Webmeister*
Exhibit
      13.2





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Rodman International
      Enterprise I, Ltd. (the "Company") as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kirk M. Warshaw, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Kirk M. WarshawKirk
                M. Warshaw
              Principal
                Financial Officer
              June
                6, 2008
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3017 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Phosphor Lite White and Phosphor 

Blue Halo. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 24, 2006 

Mr. REID (for Mr. ROCKEFELLER) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Phosphor Lite White 

and Phosphor Blue Halo. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PHOSPHOR LITE WHITE AND PHOSPHOR BLUE 

4 HALO. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of Chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 3017 IS

‘‘ 9902.32.08 Phosphor lite white or phosphor blue halo, inorganic 

products of a kind used as 

luminophores (CAS No. 

75535–31–8) (provided for 

in subheading 3206.50.00) .. Free No Change No Change On or Before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
# 252.211-7005 Reserved.

**Parent topic:**252.211 RESERVED
§ 52.1843 Summary of types (varieties) of processed raisins. ( a ) Type I—Seedless Raisins. ( 1 ) Natural.
( 2 ) Dipped, Vine-dried, or similarly processed raisins.
( b ) Type II—Golden Seedless Raisins.
( c ) Type III—Raisins with Seeds. ( 1 ) Natural. ( i ) Seeded (seeds removed).
( ii ) Unseeded-capstemmed (loose).
( iii ) Unseeded-uncapstemmed (loose).
( iv ) Layer (or Cluster).
( 2 ) Dipped, Vine-dried, or other similarly processed raisins. ( i ) Seeded (seeds removed).
( ii ) Unseeded-capstemmed (loose).
( iii ) Unseeded-uncapstemmed (loose).
( d ) Type IV—Sultana Raisins.
( e ) Type V—Zante Currant Raisins. ( 1 ) Unseeded.
( 2 ) Seeded.
( f ) Type VI—Mixed Types or Varieties of Raisins. A mixture of two or more different types (varieties) of raisins including sub-types outlined in this section but other than: ( 1 ) Mixtures containing Layer or Cluster Raisins with seeds;
( 2 ) Mixtures containing Unseeded-capstemmed and Unseeded-uncapstemmed Raisins with Seeds; and
( 3 ) mixture of Seeded and Unseeded Raisins with Seeds.
[41 FR 34751, Aug. 17, 1976. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977 and at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981, as amended at 63 FR 72101, Dec. 31, 1998]
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 33 (Friday, February 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 7440]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3066]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Notice of Idaho Panhandle Resource Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community 
Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Public Law 110-343) the Idaho Panhandle 
National Forest's Idaho Panhandle Resource Advisory Committee will meet 
Friday, February 19, 2010, at 9 a.m. in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho for a 
business meeting. The business meeting is open to the public.

DATES: February 19, 2010.

ADDRESSES: The meeting location is the Idaho Panhandle National 
Forests' Supervisor's Office, located at 3815 Schreiber Way, Coeur 
d'Alene, Idaho 83815.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ranotta K. McNair, Forest Supervisor 
and Designated Federal Official, at (208) 765-7369.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting agenda will focus on reviewing 
proposals for forest projects and recommending funding during the 
business meeting. The public forum begins at 11 a.m.

    Dated: February 10, 2010.
Ranotta K. McNair,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2010-3066 Filed 2-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
Part 5614 - SEALED BIDDING

Subpart 5614.2 - SOLICITATION OF BIDS

5614-201 Preparation of Invitations for Bid.

5614.201-6 Solicitation Provisions.

5614.207 PreBid Conference.

Subpart 5614.4 - OPENING OF BIDS AND AWARD OF CONTRACT

5614.402 Opening of Bids.

5614.402-2 Classified Bids.

5614.407 Mistakes in Bid.

5614.407-3 Other Mistakes Disclosed Before Award.

5614.407-4 Mistakes After Award. (Removed June 2021)

Subpart 5614.2 - SOLICITATION OF BIDS

5614-201 Preparation of Invitations for Bid.

5614.201-6 Solicitation Provisions.

(Revised June 2021)

(bb) The Contracting officer may include a provision substantially the same as clause 5652.214-9003

, Price History, in solicitations where the item(s) being purchased have been previously acquired and

the Contracting Officer wants to include the price history in the solicitation.

5614.207 PreBid Conference.

Contracting officers may insert a provision substantially the same as clause 5652.214-9002 , Notice

of Pre-bid Conference, in solicitations where a pre-bid conference is contemplated.
Subpart 5614.4 - OPENING OF BIDS AND AWARD OF

CONTRACT

5614.402 Opening of Bids.

5614.402-2 Classified Bids.

The Contracting Officer is responsible for insuring all attendees have been granted the proper

security classification for classified procurements and will enlist the assistance of the servicing

security office.

5614.407 Mistakes in Bid.

5614.407-3 Other Mistakes Disclosed Before Award.

(Revised March 2009) (Revised September 2013-reorganization)

(c)(1) The Chief, Contracting Office, is authorized to permit bidders to withdraw bids pursuant to

FAR 14.407-3(c)(1) . Before the withdrawal is authorized, contracting officers shall obtain legal

review.

(e) The authority in FAR 14.407-3(e) is delegated to the Director of Procurement (DOP). In all cases

pursuant to FAR 14.407-3 (a), (b), (c)(2), or (d), the package prepared in accordance with FAR

14.407-3(g)(3) shall be marked, "IMMEDIATE ACTION - MISTAKE IN BID," and sent by the most

expeditious means to SOF AT&L-KM/KX/KB as appropriate, Headquarters United States Special

Operations Command, 7701 Tampa Point Blvd., MacDill AFB, FL 33621-5323.

(h) SOF AT&L-KM or SOF AT&L-KX as appropriate shall maintain the record in accordance with

FAR 14.407-3(h) in cases pursuant to FAR 14.407-3 (a), (b), (c), and (d). The contracting office shall

maintain the records for cases pursuant to FAR 14.407-3(c)(1) .

(i) Doubtful mistakes in bid shall not be submitted by contracting offices directly to the Comptroller

General, but rather submitted to SOF AT&L-KM or SOF AT&L-KX as appropriate in accordance with

the procedures outlined in the previous paragraphs of this subsection.

5614.407-4 Mistakes After Award. (Removed June 2021)

HQ, United States Special Operations Command

Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L-K)
SOFARS 5614

February 2007
52.245-3 [Reserved]

Parent topic: 52.245 [Reserved]
#### § 8.3 Definitions.

*4-H Club Name and Emblem* as used in this part means the emblem consisting of a green four-leaf clover with stem and the letter “H” in white or gold on each leaflet, or any insignia in colorable imitation thereof, or the words, “4-H Club,” “4-H Clubs” or any combination of these or other words or characters in colorable imitation thereof.

*Cooperative Extension Service,* as used in this part includes the entire Cooperative Extension System consisting of the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture; the State Cooperative Extension Services; and the County Cooperative Extension Services.

*County Cooperative Extension Service* as used in this part refers to a county Extension office or equivalent Extension office operating under a State Cooperative Extension Service.

*National Institute of Food and Agriculture* as used in this part means the Federal agency within the United States Department of Agriculture that administers Federal agricultural cooperative extension programs.

*State Cooperative Extension Service* as used in this part means an organization established at the land-grant college or university under the Smith-Lever Act of May 8, 1914, as amended (7 U.S.C. 341-349); section 209(b) of the Act of October 26, 1974, as amended (D.C. Code, through section 31-1719(b)); or section 1444 of the National Agricultural Research, Extension, and Teaching Policy Act of 1977, as amended (7 U.S.C. 3221).

[50 FR 31582, Aug. 2, 1985, as amended at 52 FR 8432, Mar. 17, 1987; 52 FR 47660, Dec. 15, 1987; 60 FR 52293, Oct. 6, 1995; 76 FR 4803, Jan. 27, 2011]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

M IDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABA M A

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

September 14, 2006

NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT

Re: Keith Lawson v. City of Alexander City, et al.

Civil Action No. #3:06-cv-00641-DRB

The above-styled case has been reassigned to Judge W. Keith Watkins.

Please note that the case number is now #3:06-cv-00641-WKW. This new case number should

be used on all future correspondence and pleadings in this action.

 

Case 3:06-cv-00641-WKW-TFM Document 9 Filed 09/14/2006 Page 1 of 1
§ 66.9 Detectability. ( a ) *Recordkeeping requirements.* Modified genetic material is not detectable if, pursuant to the recordkeeping requirements of § 66.302, the entity responsible for making a BE food disclosure maintains: ( 1 ) Records to verify that the food is sourced from a non-bioengineered crop or source; *or*
( 2 ) Records to verify that the food has been subjected to a refinement process validated to make the modified genetic material in the food undetectable; *or*
( 3 ) Certificates of analysis or other records of testing appropriate to the specific food that confirm the absence of modified genetic material.
( b ) *Validated refining process.* ( 1 ) Analytical testing that meets the standards described in paragraph (c) of this section must be used to validate that a refining process renders modified genetic material in a food undetectable.
( 2 ) Once a refining process has been so validated, additional testing is not necessary to confirm the absence of detectable modified genetic material in food subsequently refined through that process, provided that no significant changes are made to the validated process and provided that records are maintained to demonstrate that the refining process has been validated and that the validated refining process is followed.
( c ) *Standards of performance for detectability testing.* Analytical testing for purposes of detecting the presence of modified genetic material in refined foods pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section shall meet the following standard: ( 1 ) Laboratory quality assurance must ensure the validity and reliability of test results;
( 2 ) Analytical method selection, validation, and verification must ensure that the testing method used is appropriate (fit for purpose) and that the laboratory can successfully perform the testing;
( 3 ) The demonstration of testing validity must ensure consistent accurate analytical performance; and
( 4 ) Method performance specifications must ensure analytical tests are sufficiently sensitive for the purposes of the detectability requirements of this part.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA OF

NORTHERN DIVISION

RALPH BROWN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-642-MEF

)

CHAMPION ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the defendants' Motion to Amend Uniform Scheduling

Order (Doc. #48) filed on February 4, 2008, it is hereby

ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. Section 8 of the Uniform Scheduling

Order entered by the court on January 30, 2008 is amended to read as follows:

SECTION 8. The parties shall disclose to each other the identity of

ANY person who may be used at trial to present evidence under Rules 701,

702, 703, or 705 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, and provide the reports

of retained experts or witnesses whose duties as an employee of the party

regularly involved giving expert testimony, required by Rule 26(a)(2) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as follows:

From the plaintiff(s) – May 1, 2008

From the defendant(s) – August 29, 2008.

The parties shall comply fully with all requirements of Rule 26(a)(2)

in regard to disclosure of expert testimony.

DONE this the 7th day of February, 2008.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 49 Filed 02/07/2008 Page 1 of 1
§ 799.15 Public involvement in environmental review. ( a ) FSA will involve the public in the environmental review process as early as possible and in a manner consistent with 40 CFR 1506.6. To determine the appropriate level of public participation, FSA will consider: ( 1 ) The scale of the proposed action and its probable effects;
( 2 ) The likely level of public interest and controversy; and
( 3 ) Advice received from knowledgeable parties and experts.
( b ) Depending upon the scale of the proposed action, FSA will: ( 1 ) Coordinate public notices and consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, USDA's Natural Resources Conservation Service, Federal Emergency Management Agency, the National Marine Fisheries Service, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and other agencies, as appropriate, if wetlands, floodplains, ESA-listed species, or other protected resources have the potential to be impacted;
( 2 ) Make appropriate environmental documents available to interested partiesby request;
( 3 ) Publish a Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an EIS, as specified in subpart F of this part; and
( 4 ) Publish a Notice of Availability (NOA) of draft and final EISs and RODs, as specified in subpart F of this part.
( c ) If the effects of a proposed action are local in nature and the scale of the proposed action is likely to generate interest and controversy at the local level, then in addition to the proposed actions specified in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, FSA will: ( 1 ) Notify appropriate State, local, regional, and Tribal governments and clearinghouses, and parties and organizations, including the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and Tribal Historic Preservation Officer (THPO), known to have environmental, cultural, and economic interests in the locality affected by the proposed action; and
( 2 ) Publish notice of the proposed action in the local media.
( d ) Public review for 30 days for a FONSI is necessary if any of the limited circumstances specified in 40 CFR 1501.4(e)(2)(i) or (ii) applies.