alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY

ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Eye Care centers of America, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 4, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David L. Holmberg, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |                        
|------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 15, 2009 |  | /s/ David L. Holmberg  
|                   |  | David L. Holmberg      
|                   |  | Chief Executive Officer

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO EYE CARE CENTERS OF
AMERICA, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY EYE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

RANDY ROBERTO BESS,

Petitioner,

vs. Case No.: 3:20cv6020/LAC/EMT

SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

___________________________________/

ORDER

The chief magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on February 

11, 2021 (ECF No. 3). Petitioner was furnished a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, 

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined it 

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 3) 

is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Petitioner’s failure to 

Case 3:20-cv-06020-LC-EMT Document 4 Filed 03/18/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No.: 3:20cv6020/LAC/EMT

comply with an order of the court.

3. The clerk of court is directed to close this case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 18th day of March, 2021.

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

s/L.A. Collier 

Case 3:20-cv-06020-LC-EMT Document 4 Filed 03/18/21 Page 2 of 2
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2954 

To reduce temporarily the duty on certain footwear not covering the ankle 

with coated or laminated textile fabrics. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 23, 2006 

Mr. CARPER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on certain footwear not 

covering the ankle with coated or laminated textile fabrics. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN FOOTWEAR NOT COVERING THE 

4 ANKLE WITH COATED OR LAMINATED TEX5 TILE FABRICS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 2954 IS 

‘‘ 9902.64.10 Men’s footwear, not covering 

the ankle, valued over $20/ 

pair designed to be worn 

over, or in lieu of, other 

footwear as a protection 

against water, oil, grease or 

chemicals or cold or inclement weather where such protection includes protection 

against water that is imparted by the use of a coated or laminated textile fabric 

(except footwear with waterproof injection molded bottoms, i.e. comprising a complete outer sole and all or 

part of the upper) (provided 

in subheading 6404.19.20) .. 20% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
Subpart 5127.2 - Patents and Copyrights **Parent topic:** Part 5127 - Patents, Data, and Copyrights5127.201 Patent and copyright infringement liability. 5127.201-2 Contract clauses.    (e) Obtain approval to exempt specific United States patents from the patent indemnity clause from:              Commander, US Army Legal Services Agency       Attn: JALS-RL/IP       Regulatory Law and Intellectual Property Division       9275 Gunston Road, Suite 1300       Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-5546.              However, the Commander, U.S. Army Materiel Command and designees that have patent counsel may give approval.5127.202 Royalties. 5127.202-3 Adjustment of royalties.    (a)  The office having cognizance of patent matters must report the results of any action taken in compliance with FAR 27.202-3 to the Chief, Regulatory Law and Intellectual Property Law Division, U.S. Army Legal Services Agency.
## VikingUAS-Viking One 3dMapping-UAS System Deploymen t Manual and Specifications

Special design and optimized for long range 3dMappi ng and sensor data collection with built in camera sensor package its as easy as attach sensor and fly. Aircraft is setup and ready to fly.

Easy for All Kind of Camera Mounting

Are you tired of modification? Now you don’t have t o. You can use many kinds of mounting. Stable, safe, and easy, just focus to make a video so you c an map your area of operation.Special fuselage design

Our unibody fuselage, which makes it more durable a nd stronger than other EPO foamy insert carbon tube designs can help avoid a tail stall dur ing flight which allows for slower speeds and smoother flight characteristics.

Foam under the microscope.

### VikingONE Specifications

Material: VikingUAS Proprietary Material
Wingspan: 1800mm (71inch)
Length: 1078mm (42.5 inch)
Wing area: 38.2dm2(592sq.in)
Empty weight: 750g
Barycentre position: in middle of wing, 65-80mm from leading edge
Flying Weight: 1360g(23lb) Standard, max:2kg
Wingload: 35.6g/dm2 (11.7oz/sq.ft)
Barycentre position: in middle of wing, 65-80mm from leading edge

Motor: 3536/KV1300
ESC: Hobbywing pro 40A
Propller: 2-paddle, 11X6
Servos:9g digital servos x6

RECOMMENDED SYSTEM:
Battery: 14.8V 5000 mAh 25C Li-Po (no included)

Radio: 9CH

### Radio Specifications

### This Document is Competition Sensitive and Confidential
Case 3:20-cr-00069-MCR Document 35 Filed 02/12/21 Page 1 of 7
Case 3:20-cr-00069-MCR Document 35 Filed 02/12/21 Page 2 of 7
Case 3:20-cr-00069-MCR Document 35 Filed 02/12/21 Page 3 of 7
Case 3:20-cr-00069-MCR Document 35 Filed 02/12/21 Page 4 of 7
Case 3:20-cr-00069-MCR Document 35 Filed 02/12/21 Page 5 of 7
Case 3:20-cr-00069-MCR Document 35 Filed 02/12/21 Page 6 of 7
Case 3:20-cr-00069-MCR Document 35 Filed 02/12/21 Page 7 of 7
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Authority:

7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 810.1201 Definition of rye.

Grain that, before the removal of dockage, consists of 50 percent or more of common rye (*Secale cereale* L.) and not more than 10 percent of other grains for which standards have been established under the United States Grain Standards Act and that, after the removal of dockage, contains 50 percent or more of whole rye.
Case 2:06-cr-00177-WHA-DRB Document 8 Filed 12/05/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### § 789.37 Changes or cancellations of allocations orders.

An allocations order may be changed or canceled by an official action of USDA.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

JONATHAN VARGAS, individually and 

on behalf of others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:20-cv-224-AW-GRJ

SQUEAKY KLEAN SERVICES, INC.,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER STRIKING RULE 26(f) REPORT

The parties’ Rule 26(f) report (ECF No. 12) was submitted on another court’s 

form and repeatedly references another court’s local rules and practices. It is now 

STRICKEN. Within seven days, the parties must file a new report consistent with 

the Initial Scheduling Order. Failure to do so may lead to dismissal. 

SO ORDERED on January 11, 2021. 

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-00224-AW-GRJ Document 13 Filed 01/11/21 Page 1 of 1
## Six Aeromagnetic Surveys in California, Nevada, and Arizona:A Web Site for Distribution of Data

*By***By Ronald E. Sweeney**
**U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 02-486**

Version 1.0 

This website contains digital data files and descriptions of aeromagnetic data collected in California, Nevada and Arizona.  The survey areas include:  San Bernardino Valley, San Bernardino Mountains, Twenty-Nine Palms, San Bernardino Profiles, Goldfield and Silver Bell.

 OFR-02-486 HTML Version  (This version of the report is accessible as defined in Section 508.) 

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |            U.S. Geological Survey           	URL: *http://pubsdata.usgs.gov/pubs/of/2002/ofr-02-486/index.html*            Page Contact Information: GS Pubs Web Contact           	Page Last Modified: Wednesday, 25-Oct-2023 15:23:51 EDT
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                         859,454
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      26,195,327
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,299,129
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,070,970
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          891,188
<BONDS>                                      6,103,944
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,075,788
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,070,920
<SALES>                                      2,972,041
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,002,642
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,546,029
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               950,960
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             357,166
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                148,487
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            148,487
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   148,487
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.42
        

</TABLE>
§ 623.13 Wetlands reserve plan of operations. ( a ) After NRCS has accepted the applicant for enrollment in the program, a WRPO will be developed by the landowner and NRCS, in consultation with FWS.
( b ) The WRPO shall: ( 1 ) Include an aerial photo displaying the land offered for enrollment;
( 2 ) Specify the manner in which the eligible land shall be restored, operated, and maintained to accomplish the goal of the program, including, but not limited to: ( i ) measures to control noxious weeds and insect pests in order to comply with applicable Federal, or State noxious weed and pest control laws; and
( ii ) measures to control other specified species of weeds, insects or pests;
( 3 ) Specify compatible land uses for personal enjoyment for which the landowner may be compensated. These compatible land uses shall be reserved to the landowner in the easement. Such uses may include, among others: (1) recreational use, hunting and fishing; (ii) manage timber production including harvesting; and (iii) managed haying or grazing consistent with the goals of the program;
( 4 ) Set out cost estimates of the practices required by the WRPO, the offer for the easement, and other reimbursement costs;
( 5 ) Identify access routes to be maintained for wetland restoration activities and future management and easement monitoring in connection with the land to be enrolled;
( 6 ) Make provisions deemed necessary for maintaining public drainage systems if present on lands subject to the WRPO;
( 7 ) Contain scheduled implementation dates for restoration practices;
( 8 ) Contain other provisions or limitations as NRCS, in consultation with the FWS, determines to be necessary.
( c ) NRCS in consultation with FWS will collect from State or Federal agencies whatever additional information is deemed necessary for the development of the WRPO with the landowner.
( d ) The WRPO must be signed by NRCS, FWS, Conservation District (CD), and the landowner(s). However, if agreement between NRCS and FWS, or CD at the local level is not reached within 20 calendar days, the WRPO shall be developed by the State Conservationist of NRCS in consultation with FWS or CD.
( e ) The WRPO may require that a temporary vegetative or water cover be established on the property if immediate establishment of a permanent cover is not practicable or otherwise desirable.
( f ) The terms of an approved WRPO shall not relieve the program participant of any obligation or term imposed or provided for in the contract, the easement, or this part.
( g ) WRPO, where appropriate, will provide for the development of a tree planting plan with the assistance of the FS or State forestry agency.
( h ) The WRPO, where appropriate, will provide for the development by NRCS of detailed plans for weed control, structural measures and their operation, vegetation establishment and management, and other measures as needed.
( i ) Revisions of the WRPO to enhance or protect the value for which the easement was established may be made at any time at the request of either NRCS, FWS, the owner and upon the concurrence of all three parties.
No. 14
- 14
- 01025
- CR 14
- 14
- 01026
- CR 14
- 14
- 01027
- CR In the Fourteenth Court of Appeals, Houston, Texas

CARLOS GALLEGOS
- PIEDRA Appellant

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS Appellee

Appellant’s Second Motion for
Extension of Time to File Brief

Respectfully Submitted by: Joseph Kyle Verret THE LAW OFFICE OF KYLE VERRET, PLLC Counsel for Appellant TBN: 240429432 11200 Broadway, Suite 2743 Pearland, Texas 77584 Phone: 281

- 764

- 7071 Fax: 281

- 764

- 7071 Submitted: Email: kyle@verretlaw.com March 23 , 2015 ACCEPTED 14-14-01025-CR FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 3/23/2015 3:17:05 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERKNo. 14
- 14
- 01025
- CR 14
- 14
- 01026
- CR 14
- 14
- 01027
- CR In the Fourteenth Court of Appeals, Houston, Texas
CARLOS GALLEGOS
- PIEDRA Appellant

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS Appellee Appellant’s Second Motion for
Extension of Time to File Brief Comes now, Appellant, by and through his undersigned counsel, in the above styled cause and moves this Honorable Court to extend the time for the filing of Appellant's Brief. Per Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 10.5(b), Appellant provides the following: Current Deadline for Filing: March 23, 2015 Length of Extension Sought: Thirty (30) days (to April 22, 2015)
Number of Previous Extensions Granted: One

. Basis for Extensions: Ap pellant's counsel is a solo practitioner with a busy criminal and juvenile defense caseload, which requires regular appearances in court on the part of counsel.In the thirty days since the last motion to extend time to file brief, Appellant has completed and filed an appellant brief in appeal number
01

- 14

- 00895

- CR, which is presently due to be filed with the First Court of Appeals on March 13, 2015. The record in these causes is over 400 page s . C o unsel needs additional time to review the record and prepare a cogent and succinct brief.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF For the reasons set forth above, Appellant request s that this Court grant this Appellant’s First Motion to Extend Time to File Appellant’s Brief and extend the Deadline for Filing the Appellant’s Brief up to and including April 22, 2015. Appellant prays all other relief to which he may be entitled. Respe ctfully submitted, /s/ Joseph Kyle Verret Joseph Kyle Verret THE LAW OFFICE OF KYLE VERRET, PLLC Counsel for Appellant TBN: 240429432 11200 Broadway, Suite 2743 Pearland, Texas 77584 Phone: 281

- 764

- 7071 Fax: 281

- 764

- 7071 Email: kyle@verretlaw.comCertificate of Service I certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Appellant's Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief was served on this 23rd day of March, 2015, on the Counsel for the Appellee, David Bosserman, at the Brazoria Coun ty Criminal District Attorney’s Office by e

- service through electronic filing. /s/ Joseph Kyle Verret Joseph Kyle Verret TBN: 2402932
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.31


FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
NUSTAR GP, LLC FIFTH AMENDED AND RESTATED
2000 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
This First Amendment (this “Amendment’) to the NuStar GP, LLC Fifth Amended and Restated 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is made and entered into as of February 7, 2018 pursuant to resolutions of the Compensation Committee (the “Compensation Committee”) of the board of directors (the “Board”) of NuStar GP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and the general partner (the “Company”) of Riverwalk Logistics, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership and the general partner (the “General Partner”) of NuStar Energy L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “Partnership”).
WHEREAS, Section 7(a) of the Plan provides that the Compensation Committee or the Board may amend the Plan for any reason and without the consent of any holder of an award thereunder; 
WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee believes that amending the Plan as set forth in this Amendment will not adversely affect the material rights of any holder of an award thereunder; and
WHEREAS, in connection with the Merger (as defined in the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of February 7, 2018, by and among the Partnership, the General Partner, the Company, Marshall Merger Sub LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Partnership, NuStar GP Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“NSH”) and Riverwalk Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a wholly owned subsidiary of NSH), the Company desires to amend the Plan to clarify that the Merger does not constitute a “Change of Control” within the meaning of the Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed as follows:
		
	1.
	Section 2.5 of the Plan is hereby amended to add to the end thereof the following:




Notwithstanding anything in this Plan or any Award to the contrary, no Change of Control shall occur or be deemed to occur upon the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among NuStar Energy L.P., Riverwalk Logistics, L.P., NuStar GP, LLC, Marshall Merger Sub LLC, Riverwalk Holdings, LLC and NuStar GP Holdings, LLC to be dated on or about February 7, 2018, as it may be amended from time to time.
		
	2.
	Except as hereby modified, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.




[Signature Page Follows]













IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed this First Amendment to the NuStar GP, LLC Fifth Amended and Restated 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan as of the date first written above.
NUSTAR GP, LLC
    
By:    /s/ Thomas R. Shoaf                    
Name:    Thomas R. Shoaf
Title:     Executive Vice President and Chief 
 Financial Officer


















































































Signature Page to the First Amendment to the NuStar GP, LLC 
Fifth Amended and Restated 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA OF

EASTERN DIVISION

SONJA WHITLOW, #136698, )

)

Petitioner, )

v. ) CASE NO. 3:06-cv-655-MEF

)

JOHN DENSON, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

O R D E R

There being no objections filed to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge

entered on September 20, 2006 (Doc. #10), said Recommendation is hereby adopted and it

is the

ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE that the 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas

corpus relief is DENIED and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice as this court lacks

jurisdiction to consider the petitioner's claims for relief. 

DONE this the 16th day of October, 2006.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00655-MEF-CSC Document 11 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### § 945.111 Fiscal period.

The fiscal period that began June 1, 1981, shall end July 31, 1982. Each year thereafter *fiscal period* shall mean the period beginning August 1 and ending the following July 31.

[47 FR 17272, Apr. 22, 1982]
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

CASEY FRAZIER,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO: 4:20-cv-00593-AW-MJF

PONDSCO FACILITY SERVICES, 

LLC, f/k/a XENOCOM FACILITY 

MANAGEMENT, LLC,

Defendant.

________________________________/

JOINT NOTICE STIPULATING TO ORDER GRANTING MOTION 

TO STAY PROCEEDINGS AND COMPEL ARBITRATION

Plaintiff, Casey Frazier, and Defendant, Pondsco Facility Services, LLC f/k/a 

Xenocom Facility Management, LLC, file this notice to the Court of the parties’ 

agreement to an order staying the case and compelling arbitration, consistent with 

the motion filed by Defendant, ECF No. 2.

Case 4:20-cv-00593-AW-MJF Document 6 Filed 01/07/21 Page 1 of 2
2

Respectfully submitted this 7th day of January 2021. 

/s/ Erika E. Goodman

ERIKA E. GOODMAN

FL Bar No.: 060951

MARIE A. MATTOX, P.A.

203 North Gadsden St.

Tallahassee, FL 32301

(850) 383-4800 (telephone)

(850) 383-4801 (facsimile)

Erika@erikagoodmanlaw.com

Attorney for Plaintiff, Casey Frazier

/s/ Keith L. Bell, Jr. 

KEITH L. BELL, JR.

Fla. Bar No.: 573809

TREVOR A. THOMPSON

Fla. Bar No.: 68006

CLARK PARTINGTON

106 East College Avenue, Suite 600

Tallahassee, FL 32301

Telephone: (850) 597-7483

Facsimile: (850) 597-7591

tthompson@clarkpartington.com

kbell@clarkpartington.com

hrice@clarkpartington.com

Attorneys for Defendant, Pondsco 

Facility Services, LLC, f/k/a Xenocom 

Facility Management, LLC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 7th day of January 2021, a true and correct copy 

of the foregoing has been furnished electronically through the CM/ECF portal, to 

the following:

Erika E. Goodman, Esq.

Marie A. Mattox, Esq. 

Marie A. Mattox, P.A.

203 North Gadsden Street

Tallahassee, Florida 32303 

marie@mattoxlaw.com

marlene@mattoxlaw.com

michelle@mattoxlaw.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

/s/ Keith L. Bell, Jr. 

KEITH L. BELL, JR.

Case 4:20-cv-00593-AW-MJF Document 6 Filed 01/07/21 Page 2 of 2