alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) 2:06-mj-0075-DRB

)

RONALD MCQUEEN )

ORDER ON MOTION

Pursuant to the Notice of Appearance filed by Susan James (Doc. 10, August 3, 2006), it is

hereby 

ORDERED that the Motion to Withdraw (Doc. 11, August 3, 2006), filed by Assistant

Federal Defender Donnie Bethel is GRANTED. The clerk isinstructed to designate Susan G. James

as counsel of record for Defendant Ronald McQueen.

Done this 4 day of August, 2006. th

/s/ Delores R. Boyd

DELORES R. BOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-mj-00075-DRB Document 14 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### In the Matter of Raymond Harbeck, Petitioner, v Barbara Blum, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, et al., Respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of the respondent Commissioner of New York State Department of Sociál Services, made after a fair hearing, which affirmed the decision of the respondent Ulster County Department of Social Services denying petitioner’s application for approval to purchase an air conditioner and humidifier. Petitioner, a 28-year-old recipient of public assistance, is a chronic asthmatic, and sought to obtain an air conditioner and a humidifier under the Medicaid program, as items of necessary medical supplies (Social Services Law, § 365-a). Authorization to purchase such equipment was denied by the local agency’s medical director (cf. 18 NYCRR 505.3), who subsequently testified at a fair hearing that his decision was based on a *727medical determination. It was his view that air conditioning was not necessary for the treatment of asthma and, in many instances, was contraindicated. Further, that while a humidifier might provide some relief, the possibilities of locating a vaporizer near petitioner had not been sufficiently explored as an alternative. Although the medical director had never examined petitioner (see *Matter of Denise R. v Lavine,*39 NY2d 279, 282), his opinions were not directly refuted by expert proof or by a showing that different considerations applied to petitioner’s specific condition. At most, there was a conflict in the evidence over what was medically necessary for him and, on that basis, it was rational for respondent to accept the medical director’s decision. Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Main and Casey, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

MONTY W. ERVIN, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

v. ) CASE NO. 1:06-mc-3331-MEF

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

O R D E R

It is hereby ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this case is referred

to Magistrate Judge Delores R. Boyd for all pretrial proceedings and entry of any orders or

recommendations as may be appropriate.

DONE this the 24th day of August, 2006.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-mc-03331-MEF-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 1 of 1
239.001 Applicability.

Notwithstanding FAR 39.001, this part applies to acquisitions of information technology, including

national security systems.

Parent topic: Part 239 - ACQUISITION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

KEITH LAWSON, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 3:06-CV-641-WKW

)

CITY OF ALEXANDER CITY, et. al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

Upon consideration of the parties’ Joint Stipulation for Dismissal (Doc. #24), it is

ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Each party

shall bear its own costs.

The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final

judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

DONE this 23rd day of October, 2007.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00641-WKW-TFM Document 25 Filed 10/23/2007 Page 1 of 1
157 So.2d 232

#### Otis R. WILLIS, Mr. and Mrs. Oscar A. Carlson, Jr., Mr. and Mrs. Harold L. Giese, Miss Elaine Harriet Carlson and Mr. and Mrs. Warren W. Schaefer, v. The NEW ORLEANS EAST UNIT OF JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES, INC.

No. 46974.

Nov. 12, 1963.

In re: The New Orleans East Unit of Jehovah’s Witnesses, Inc., applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 156 So.2d 310.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.
Case 2:06-cv-00654-MEF-WC Document 26 Filed 07/11/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00654-MEF-WC Document 26 Filed 07/11/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00654-MEF-WC Document 26 Filed 07/11/2007 Page 3 of 3
#### Suzanne M. Wennberg, Respondent, v. Peder K. Wennberg, Appellant.

Order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated July 30, 1969, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements *(Lebovics*v. *Lebovics,*34 A H 2d 783). The case should proceed to trial promptly. Christ, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
252.243-7002 Requests for Equitable Adjustment.       As prescribed in                 243.205-71             , use the following clause:          REQUESTS FOR EQUITABLE ADJUSTMENT (DEC 2022)          (a)  The amount of any request for equitable adjustment to contract terms shall accurately reflect the contract adjustment for which the Contractor believes the Government is liable.  The request shall include only costs for performing the change, and shall not include any costs that already have been reimbursed or that have been separately claimed.  All indirect costs included in the request shall be properly allocable to the change in accordance with applicable acquisition regulations.          (b) In accordance with 10 U.S.C. 3862(a), any request for equitable adjustment to contract terms that exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold shall bear, at the time of submission, the following certificate executed by an individual authorized to certify the request on behalf of the Contractor:                    I certify that the request is made in good faith, and                            that the supporting data are accurate and complete to the best of my                            knowledge and belief.(Official’s Name)(Title)          (c)  The certification in paragraph (b) of this clause requires full disclosure of all relevant facts, including—          (1)  Certified cost or pricing data, if required, in accordance with subsection 15.403-4 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); and          (2)  Data other than certified cost or pricing data, in accordance with subsection **215.403-5**             of the FAR, including actual cost data and data to support any estimated costs, even if certified cost or pricing data are not required.          (d)  The certification requirement in paragraph (b) of this clause does not apply to—          (1)  Requests for routine contract payments; for example, requests for payment for accepted supplies and services, routine vouchers under a cost-reimbursement type contract, or progress payment invoices; or          (2)  Final adjustments under an incentive provision of the contract.          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 252.243 RESERVED
#### § 925.32 Annual report.

The committee should, as soon as practicable, after the close of each fiscal period, prepare and mail an annual report to the Secretary and make a copy available to each grower and handler who requests a copy of the report.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3135 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 40-piece carbide router bit set for 

woodworking. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. CHAMBLISS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 40-piece carbide router 

bit set for woodworking. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 40-PIECE CARBIDE ROUTER BIT SET FOR 

4 WOODWORKING. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.82.07 40-piece carbide router bit set for woodworking (provided for in subheading 

8207.70.30) ............................................. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 3135 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
#### § 906.41 Gift fruit shipments.

The handling to any person of gift packages of fruit individually addressed to such person, in quantities aggregating not more than 500 pounds and not for resale, are exempt from the provisions of §§ 906.34, 906.40, and 906.45, and the regulations issued thereunder, but shall conform to such safeguards as may be established pursuant to § 906.43.
§ 915.65 Proceedings after termination. ( a ) Upon the termination of the provisions of this part, the committee shall, for the purpose of liquidating the affairs of the committee, continue as trustees of all the funds and property then in its possession, or under its control, including claims for any funds unpaid or property not delivered at the time of such termination.
( b ) The said trustees shall ( 1 ) continue in such capacity until discharged by the Secretary;
( 2 ) from time to time account for all receipts and disbursements and deliver all property on hand, together with all books and records of the committee and of the trustees, to such persons as the Secretary may direct; and
( 3 ) upon the request of the Secretary, execute such assignments or other instruments necessary or appropriate to vest in such person, full title and right to all of the funds, property, and claims vested in the committee or the trustees pursuant thereto.
( c ) Any person to whom funds, property, or claims have been transferred or delivered, pursuant to this section, shall be subject to the same obligation imposed upon the committee and upon the trustees.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OFALABAMA

________________________DIVISION

_________________________________, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO.__________________

)

_________________________________, )

)

Defendants, )

CONFLICT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

COMES NOW ___________________,a intheabove-captioned

matter,and in accordance with the orderofthis Court,making the following disclosure

concerning parentcompanies,subsidiaries,partners,limited liability entity members and

managers,trustees(butnottrustbeneficiaries),affiliates,orsimilarentitiesreportableunder

theprovisionsoftheMiddleDistrictofAlabama’sGeneralOrderNo.3047:

Thispartyisanindividual,or

Thispartyisagovernmentalentity,or

Therearenoentitiestobereported,or

Thefollowingentitiesandtheirrelationshiptothepartyareherebyreported:

ReportableEntity RelationshiptoParty

________________________________ _________________________________

________________________________ _________________________________

________________________________ _________________________________

________________________________ _________________________________

Date (Signature)

(Counsel’sName)

Counselfor(printnamesofallparties)

Address,City,StateZipCode

TelephoneNumber

NORTHERN

Leroy Williams

State of Alabama Department of Transportation, et al.

2:06-cv-658-TFM

Leroy Williams

/s/ Russell W. Adams

Leroy Williams

Wiggins, Childs, Quinn & Pantazis, LLC

301 19th Street North

205-314-0500

Plaintiff

Russell W. Adams

Case 2:06-cv-00658-TFM Document 50 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

________________________ DIVISION

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I,____________________________________, do hereby Certify that a true and correct copy

of the foregoing has been furnished by ___________________________(manner of service,

i.e., U.S. Mail, electronic mail, etc.) on this _______day of ____________ 20__, to:

Date Signature

NORTHERN

Russell W. Adams, Counsel for Plaintiff

notification via the CM/ECF system

17th July

Jim R. Ippolito, Esq. Andrew Redd, Esq., Mitchell Alton, III, Esq.

Alabama Department of Transportation

1409 Coliseum Boulevard

Montgomery, Alabama 36110

7/17/2007

07

/s/ Russell W. Adams

Case 2:06-cv-00658-TFM Document 50 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 2 of 2
210.001 Policy.       (a) In addition to the requirements of FAR 10.001(a)—          (i)(A) Agencies shall conduct market research appropriate to the circumstances before issuing a solicitation with tiered evaluation of offers (section 816 of Pub. L. 109-163); and          (B) Use the results of market research to determine whether the criteria in FAR part 19 are met for setting aside the acquisition for small business or, for a task or delivery order, whether there are a sufficient number of qualified small business concerns available to justify limiting competition under the terms of the contract. If the contracting officer cannot determine whether the criteria are met, the contracting officer shall include a written explanation in the contract file as to why such a determination could not be made (section 816 of Pub. L. 109-163).          (ii) Contracting officers shall use market research, where appropriate, to inform price reasonableness determinations (see 212.209 and 234.7002).          (c)(2) In addition to the notification requirements at FAR 10.001(c)(2)(i) and (ii), see                 205.205-70              for the bundling notification publication requirement.    **Parent topic:** Part 210 - MARKET RESEARCH
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY

ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Eye Care centers of America, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 28, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David L. Holmberg, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                |  |                        
|--------------- |  | -----------------------
|August 11, 2008 |  |                        
|                | 
|                |  | /s/ David L. Holmberg  
|                |  | David L. Holmberg      
|                |  | Chief Executive Officer

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO EYE CARE CENTERS OF
AMERICA, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY EYE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 236 (Thursday, December 9, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 76754]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30906]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-841 (Second Review)]


Non-Frozen Apple Juice Concentrate From China

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Termination of five-year review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The subject five-year review was initiated in October 2010 to 
determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty order on non-
frozen apple juice concentrate from China would be likely to lead to 
continuation or recurrence of material injury. On November 15, 2010, 
the Department of Commerce published notice that it was revoking the 
order effective November 2, 2010, ``{b{time} ecause the domestic 
interested parties did not participate in this sunset review * * *'' 
(75 FR 69628). Accordingly, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff 
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), the subject review is terminated.

DATES: Effective Date: November 2, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Messer (202-205-3193), Office of 
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired individuals are advised that 
information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the 
Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility 
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the 
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. 
General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by 
accessing its Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov).

    Authority:  This review is being terminated under authority of 
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 
pursuant to section 207.69 of the Commission's rules (19 CFR 
207.69).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: December 3, 2010.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-30906 Filed 12-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                            1929
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        8
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1938
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1938
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               85
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        1853
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1938
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    23
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    46
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (23)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (23)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (23)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.28)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2900 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2900

 To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on preparations based on 
       ethanediamide, N-(2-ethoxyphenyl)-N'-(4-isodecylphenyl)-).

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 19, 2006

   Mr. Burr introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on preparations based on 
       ethanediamide, N-(2-ethoxyphenyl)-N'-(4-isodecylphenyl)-).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PREPARATIONS BASED ON ETHANEDIAMIDE, N-(2-ETHOXYPHENYL)-N'-
              (4-ISODECYLPHENYL)-).

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.04.05 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to preparations based on 
ethanediamide, N-(2-ethoxyphenyl)-N'-(4-isodecylphenyl)-)) is amended 
by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 91

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 91 appear at 61 FR 51350, Oct. 2 1996.

#### § 91.33 When an application for an appeal of a laboratory service may be withdrawn.

An application for an appeal of a laboratory service may be withdrawn by the applicant at any time before the appealed laboratory service is performed; *Provided,* That, the applicant shall pay, at the hourly rate prescribed in § 91.37, for the time incurred by the laboratory personnel, any travel, telephone, telegraph, or other expenses which have been incurred by the laboratory service in connection with such application.
§ 900.55 Judges. ( a ) *Assignment.* No judge who has any pecuniary interest in the outcome of the proceeding, or who has participated in any investigation preceding the institution of the proceeding, shall serve as judge in such proceeding.
( b ) *Conduct.* The judge shall conduct the proceeding in a fair and impartial manner and shall not discuss ex parte the merits of the proceeding with any person who is or who has been connected in any manner with the proceeding in an advocative or investigative capacity.
( c ) *Powers of judges.* Subject to review by the Secretary, as provided elsewhere in this subpart, the judge shall have power to: ( 1 ) Rule upon motions and requests;
( 2 ) Adjourn the hearing from time to time, and change the time and place of hearing;
( 3 ) Administer oaths and affirmations and take affidavits;
( 4 ) Issue subpenas, under the facsimile signature of the Secretary, requiring the attendance and testimony of witnesses and the production of books, records, contracts, papers, and other documentary evidence;
( 5 ) Examine witnesses and receive evidence;
( 6 ) Take or order, under the facsimile signature of the Secretary, the taking of depositions;
( 7 ) Admit or exclude evidence;
( 8 ) Hear oral argument on facts or law;
( 9 ) Consolidate hearings upon two or more petitions pertaining to the same order;
( 10 ) Do all acts and take all measures necessary for the maintenance of order at the hearing and the efficient conduct of the proceeding.
( d ) *Who may act in absence of judge.* In case of the absence of the judge or his inability to act, the powers and duties to be performed by him under these rules of practice in connection with a proceeding may, without abatement of the proceeding unless otherwise ordered by the Secretary, be assigned to any other judge.
( e ) *Disqualification of judge.* The judge may at any time withdraw as judge in a proceeding if he deems himself to be disqualified. Upon the filing by an interested person in good faith of a timely and sufficient affidavit of personal bias or disqualification of a judge, the Secretary shall determine the matter as a part of the record and decision in the proceeding, after making such investigation or holding such hearings, or both, as he may deem appropriate in the circumstances.