alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
52.236-17 Layout of Work.       As prescribed in 36.517, insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts when a fixed-price construction contract is contemplated and use of this clause is appropriate due to a need for accurate work layout and for siting verification during work performance:          Layout of Work (Apr 1984)          The Contractor shall lay out its work from Government established base lines and bench marks indicated on the drawings, and shall be responsible for all measurements in connection with the layout. The Contractor shall furnish, at its own expense, all stakes, templates, platforms, equipment, tools, materials, and labor required to lay out any part of the work. The Contractor shall be responsible for executing the work to the lines and grades that may be established or indicated by the Contracting Officer. The Contractor shall also be responsible for maintaining and preserving all stakes and other marks established by the Contracting Officer until authorized to remove them. If such marks are destroyed by the Contractor or through its negligence before their removal is authorized, the Contracting Officer may replace them and deduct the expense of the replacement from any amounts due or to become due to the Contractor.          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.236 [Reserved]
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 51 Filed 03/26/2007 Page 1 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 51 Filed 03/26/2007 Page 2 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 51 Filed 03/26/2007 Page 3 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 51 Filed 03/26/2007 Page 4 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 51 Filed 03/26/2007 Page 5 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 51 Filed 03/26/2007 Page 6 of 6
#### § 900.502 Indexes.

Pursuant to the regulations in § 1.4(b) of this title, AMS will maintain and make available for public inspection and copying current indexes of all material required to be made available in § 1.2(a) of this title. Notice is hereby given that publication of these indexes is unnecessary and impractical, since the material is voluminous and does not change often enough to justify the expense of publication.

[44 FR 39151, July 5, 1979]
#### § 905.85 Duration of immunities.

The benefits, privileges, and immunities conferred upon any person by virtue of this part shall cease upon its termination, except with respect to acts done under and during the existence of this part.
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**As      Adopted Pursuant to **

**Section      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                as of and for the period covered by this                report. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                   |                                                                                |                              |
|----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|                                   |                                                                                |
|                              |                                                                           |                         |
| Dated: June              19, 2007 | By:                                                                       | /s/ Ernest              Azua |
|                                   | Ernest                Azua                                                          |
|                                   | Executive                Vice President(Principal                Executive Officer) |

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Orlando Rodriguez, Appellant.

[813 NYS2d 432]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (John A.K. Bradley, J.), rendered October 26, 2004, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first and third degrees, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of 20 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

The court’s *Sandoval*ruling balanced the appropriate factors and was a proper exercise of discretion *(see People v Hayes,*97 NY2d 203 [2002]; *People v Pavao,*59 NY2d 282, 292 [1983]). Although the prior conviction at issue was similar to the instant charges, both the type of crime and the underlying facts were highly probative of defendant’s willingness to place his own interests above those of society, and thus of his credibility.

The court properly exercised its discretion in admitting evidence of a large quantity of drugs recovered from a house connected to two men who, after a series of meetings with defendant, provided him with a van loaded with similarly packaged drugs. Although defendant was not charged with possessing the drugs in the house, that evidence was “inextricably interwoven” with the charged crime in many respects *(People v Vails,*43 NY2d 364, 368 [1977]), and it tended both to corroborate the charge defendant knowingly possessed the similarly packaged drugs in the van and to rebut defendant’s defense of being an innocent dupe. Since any prejudicial effect this evidence may have had was outweighed by its relevance, the court properly permitted it to be introduced *(see People v Alvino,*71 NY2d 233, 242 [1987]).

Defendant’s remaining contentions, including his constitu*308tional arguments, are unpreserved, and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Andrias, Nardelli, Sweeny and McGuire, JJ.
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-2/February%202013/P-13-0225/p130225c.eng.txt[3/8/2013 10:14:32 AM]

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0224 , 0225

Focus Ready Draft 2/4/2013

ENGINEER: Arnold \ REC

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: 

 
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-2/February%202013/P-13-0225/p130225c.eng.txt[3/8/2013 10:14:32 AM]

SAT (concerns) (01/25/2013):

Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info:

Migration to groundwater: negl - low

PBT rating: P1B1T2 .

Health: 1-2 Drinking Water, Inhalation

Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 390 ppb)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 0-1

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

None.

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0224 , 0225

Processing/Use: 

Number of Sites/ Location: 1

unknown site

Days/yr: 278
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-2/February%202013/P-13-0225/p130225c.eng.txt[3/8/2013 10:14:32 AM]

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below

may coincide with daily releases from the other sources

to the same medium.

Water or Incineration or Landfill

Conservative: 3.6E-1 kg/site-day over 278 days/yr from 1

site

or 10.0E+1 kg/yr

Water or Incineration or Landfill

High End: 1.9E+0 kg/site-day over 80 days/yr from 1 site

or 1.5E+2 kg/yr

RELEASE TOTAL

2.5E+2 kg/yr - all sites

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-2/February%202013/P-13-0225/p130225c.eng.txt[3/8/2013 10:14:32 AM]
The DJI S900 manual is too large for upload to re gulations.gov. Therefore, if interested, please follow the link below to the assembly and operating manual for the sUAS. http://www.dji.com/product/spr eading-wings-s900/download
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2697 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2006 

Referred to the Committee on International Relations 

AN ACT 

To establish the position of the United States Ambassador 

for ASEAN Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘United States Ambas5 sador for ASEAN Affairs Act’’. 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS
2 

S 2697 RFH 

1 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

2 Congress makes the following findings: 

3 (1) The Association of Southeast Asian Nations 

4 (referred to in this Act as ‘‘ASEAN’’) was estab5 lished in 1967, with an initial membership of Indo6 nesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, and 

7 Thailand. 

8 (2) ASEAN is committed to accelerating eco9 nomic growth, social progress, cultural development 

10 and regional peace and stability. 

11 (3) The membership of ASEAN has expanded 

12 to 10 countries since its establishment in 1967. 

13 (4) The United States seeks to maintain and 

14 further develop a constructive and cordial relation15 ship with ASEAN. 

16 (5) The countries comprising ASEAN— 

17 (A) constitute the 3rd largest export mar18 ket for United States products; 

19 (B) have received nearly $90,000,000,000 

20 in direct investment from United States 

21 sources; and 

22 (C) are developing an integrated free trade 

23 area. 

24 (6) Trade between the United States and the 

25 countries comprising ASEAN totals approximately 

26 $130,000,000,000. 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS
3 

S 2697 RFH 

1 (7) ASEAN continues to contribute to regional 

2 stability in East Asia and has partnered with the 

3 United States to combat global terror. 

4 (8) In 2006, approximately 38,000 students 

5 from the countries comprising ASEAN were study6 ing in the United States. 

7 (9) The countries comprising ASEAN share a 

8 common concern with the United States regarding— 

9 (A) the spread of avian influenza and other 

10 diseases; and 

11 (B) environmental issues, such as the pres12 ervation of biodiversity and the prevention of il13 legal logging. 

14 (10) It is in the long-term interest of the 

15 United States to maintain and expand a relationship 

16 with ASEAN. 

17 (11) The United States does not have an Am18 bassador to ASEAN, which limits the ability of the 

19 United States and ASEAN to respond quickly and 

20 appropriately to events of mutual interest. 

21 SEC. 3. UNITED STATES AMBASSADOR FOR ASEAN. 

22 (a) APPOINTMENT.—There is established in the De23 partment of State the position of United States Ambas24 sador for ASEAN Affairs, who shall be appointed by the 

25 President, subject to the advice and consent of the Senate. 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS
4 

S 2697 RFH 

1 (b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con2 gress that a Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for East 

3 Asia and the Pacific should be designated as the Ambas4 sador for ASEAN Affairs. 

Passed the Senate September 7 (legislative day, September 6), 2006. 

Attest: EMILY J. REYNOLDS, 

Secretary. 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 62 Filed 12/27/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 62 Filed 12/27/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 62 Filed 12/27/2007 Page 3 of 3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

      ( print page 75469)    

# TIME AND DATE: 

December 8, 2010-10 a.m.

# PLACE: 

800 North Capitol Street, NW., First Floor Hearing Room, Washington, DC.

# STATUS: 

Part of the meeting will be in Open Session and the remainder of the meeting will be in Closed Session.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

 

## Open Session

1. Staff Update on Cruise West.

2. Initiative to Modernize Commission Rules of Practice and Procedure.

## Closed Session

                    1.                     *Fact Finding No. 27:*                     Complaints or Inquiries from Individual Shippers of Household Goods or Private Automobiles—Discussion of the Fact Finding Officer's Interim Report.                

                    2.                     *Fact Finding Investigation No. 26:*                     Vessel Capacity and Equipment Availability in the United States Export and Import Liner Trades—Discussion of the Fact Finding Officer's Final Report.                

                    3.                     *Petition No. P1-01:*                     Petition of Hainan P O Shipping Co., Ltd., for an Exemption from the First Sentence of Section 9(c) of the Shipping Act.                

4. Staff Briefing and Discussion Regarding Passenger Vessel Financial Responsibility.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Karen V. Gregory, Secretary, (202) 523-5725.

[FR Doc. 2010-30438 Filed 12-1-10; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Authority:

7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 868.201 Definition of rough rice.

Rice (*Oryza sativa* L.) which consists of 50 percent or more of paddy kernels (see § 868.202(i)) of rice.

[34 FR 7863, May 17, 1969. Redesignated and amended at 60 FR 16364, 16365, Mar. 30, 1995]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2871 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2871

        To suspend temporarily the duty on MKH 6561 Isocyanate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 19, 2006

   Mr. Burr introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To suspend temporarily the duty on MKH 6561 Isocyanate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MKH 6561 ISOCYANATE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.11.13       2-(Carbomethoxy)   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         benzenesulfonyl                                                    31/2009
                         isocyanate (CAS
                         No. 74222-95-0)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2930.90.29)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 760.819 Misrepresentation, scheme, or device. ( a ) A person is ineligible to receive assistance under this part if it is determined that such person has: ( 1 ) Adopted any scheme or device that tends to defeat the purpose of this program;
( 2 ) Made any fraudulent representation under this program;
( 3 ) Misrepresented any fact affecting a program or person determination; or
( 4 ) Has violated or been determined ineligible under § 1400.5 of this title.
### SERVED : APRI L 13 , 201 1 U.S . DEPARTMEN

T O FTRANSPORTATIO

N c

i ARTMEN T O F OFFICE O

FHEARINGS - ; \NSPORTAT!O

N WASHINGTON , DC . .^K c \OPERATION

; ;'C 0 1 P R ! U A iQ : 0 ^ 

### I N TH E MATTE

RO F AIRLIN E TRANSPOR

T PROFESSIONAL S FA A DOCKE

T NO . [T O B E ASSIGNED ] (Civil Penalt

y Action ) FDM S NO . FAA-2011-028 9 NOTIC E O FASSIGNMEN T O FPROCEEDIN G Thi s proceeding (heretofor

e designate da s Cas e No . 2008EA210042 ) ha s bee n assigne d t o the undersigned . All futur e pleading s an

dothe r communication s regarding thi s proceedin g shall b e servedo

n the Judge , the FA

A Hearin g Docket , an

dthe othe r person s o n the attached Servic e List .

snnieAr Y Chief Administratiy e Attachmen

t - Servic e Lis t

### ORIG ;

Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , A Wilbu r Wrigh t Building— S Ala n Armstrong , Respondent' s Counse l Ala n Armstrong , Attorne y a t La w 290 0 Chamble e Tucke r

Road , Buildin g 5 , Suit e 35 0 Atlanta , G A 3034 1 TEL : 770-451-031 3 FAX : 770-451-031 7 Geral dA . Ellis , Complainant' s Counse l QjEfic e o f th e Regiona l Counsel , ASO- 7 Southern Regio n Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n P.O . Bo x 2063 6 Atianta , GA 3023 0 TEL : 404-305-520 0 FAX : 404-305-522 3 Th e Honorabl e Roimi e A . Yoder , Chie f Administrativ e La w Judg e U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Offic e o f Hearings , M-20 , Roo mE12-32 0 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S . E . WasMngton , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-214 2 FAX : 202-366-753 6 • S - ••} y FDMSiNo . E I W (Civi l Pe : 1-02 ^

•^*i f / • /

' Servic e was by U.S . Mail . For servic e i n Aviation Administration , 600 Independenc e Avcaiite, D C 20591 ; Att«ition : Hearing Docke t Cleric , AG ' .*;/. . •:>^?'.-fJ^•• •

/(( n (.>*•• .

;v-f||:|?^?"'-Uj*; ;

iis e th e ^towmgjMl||r(!M : f«deni i
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

DAVID FINNEY, an individual, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO.3:06cv622-WKW

)

NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER ON MOTION

This action is presently before the court on plaintiff's renewed motion for leave of

court to propound additional written interrogatories (Doc. # 30). Plaintiff seeks leave "to

serve written interrogatory requests over and above the 25 interrogatory limit set forth in

F.R.C.P. 33(a)" on the Takata defendants. (Motion, p. 3). Plaintiff has failed to provide the

court with sufficient information to permit an evaluation of this request. See Fed. R. Civ.

P. 33(a); 26(b)(2). He has not supported his motion with an explanation of the subject matter

of the proposed interrogatories, or with copies of the interrogatories already propounded,

defendants' responses to those interrogatories (if any), the additional interrogatories he now

seeks to serve, or any other documentation demonstrating that additional interrogatories are

warranted. Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED that the motion is DENIED without prejudice.

DONE, this 28th day of November, 2006.

Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 33 Filed 11/28/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 33 Filed 11/28/2006 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

DAVID W. JAHN, )

 ) 

Plaintiff, )

 ) 

vs. ) Civil Action No.: 2:06-cv-623 

 ) 

REGINALD JAMES WASHINGTON, et al. ) 

 )

Defendants. ) 

 

NOTICE TO CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT

Take notice that the undersigned has, this date, served on counsel for all parties the 

following: 

Notice of Deposition of David W. Jahn 

May 23, 2007 at 1:00 p.m. 

This the 2nd day of May, 2007. 

 __/s/John W. Clark, Jr. 

 JOHN W. CLARK, JR. –ASB-2581-c61j 

 Attorney for Defendant 

OF COUNSEL: 

CLARK, HAIR & SMITH, P.C. 

800 Shades Creek Parkway, Suite 850 

Birmingham, AL 35209 

205/397-2900 

205/397-2901 Fax 

Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 28 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 1 of 4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

DAVID W. JAHN, )

 ) 

Plaintiff, )

 ) 

vs. ) Civil Action No.: 2:06-cv-623 

 ) 

REGINALD JAMES WASHINGTON, et al. ) 

 )

Defendants. ) 

NOTICE OF DEPOSITION

Please take notice that the Defendant will take the testimony by deposition upon oral 

examination for the purpose of discovery or for use as evidence in this cause, or both purposes, 

in accordance with the Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure of: 

Deponent: David W. Jahn 

Date: May 23, 2007 

Time: 1:00 p.m. 

 Place: Cochran, Cherry, Givens, 

 Smith, Lane & Taylor, P.C. 

 163 West Main Street 

 Dothan, Alabama 36302 

Before: Freedom Court Reporting 

 

 

 

 _/s/John W. Clark, Jr. 

 JOHN W. CLARK, JR. – ASB2581-C61j 

 Attorney for Defendants 

OF COUNSEL: 

CLARK, HAIR & SMITH, P.C. 

800 Shades Creek Parkway, Suite 850 

Birmingham, AL 35209 

205/397-2900 

205/397-2901 Fax 

Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 28 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 2 of 4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have this 2nd day of May, 2007 electronically served the following 

attorneys of record: 

Terry G. Key 

Christy L. Hayes 

COCHRAN, CHERRY, GIVENS, 

SMITH, LANE & TAYLOR, P.C. 

PO Box 927 

Dothan, AL 36302 

 _/s/John W. Clark, Jr. 

OF COUNSEL 

Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 28 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 3 of 4
 

Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 28 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 4 of 4
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

ORIN TURNER,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff Below,

Appellee.

§

§ 

§ No. 428, 2019

§

§ Court Below—Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ Cr. ID No. 0609012387A(K)

§

§

§

Submitted: May 19, 2020

Decided: June 18, 2020

Before VALIHURA, VAUGHN, and TRAYNOR, Justices.

O R D E R

After careful consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the State’s motion 

to affirm, and the record on appeal, we conclude that the judgment below should be 

affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court’s order, dated August 9, 2019, denying 

the appellant’s second motion for postconviction relief as procedurally barred, and 

the Superior Court’s order, dated October 2, 2019, denying the appellant’s motion 

for reconsideration of the August 9, 2019 order. As the Superior Court observed, 

the appellant has not pleaded any circumstances under Rule 61(d)(2)(i) or (d)(2)(ii) 
2

that overcome the procedural bars set forth in Rule 61,

1 nor does he claim that the 

Superior Court lacked jurisdiction.2

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to affirm is 

GRANTED and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED. 

BY THE COURT:

/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr.

Justice

 

1 DEL. SUPER. CT. CRIM. R. 61(i).

2

Id. R. 61(i)(5).