alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3067 

To reduce temporarily the duty on NOA 446510 Technical. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. CORNYN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on NOA 446510 Technical. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NOA 446510 TECHNICAL. 

4 (a) CALENDAR YEARS 2007 AND 2008.—Subchapter 

5 II of chapter 99 is amended by inserting in numerical se6 quence the following new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.12.07 4-Chloro-N-[2-[3-methoxy-4- 

(2- 

propynyloxy)phenyl]ethyl]-α- 

(2- 

propynyloxy)benzeneacetamide 

(Mandipropamid) (CAS No. 

374726–62–2) (provided for 

in subheading 2924.29.47) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

7 (b) CALENDAR YEAR 2009.— 


sroberts on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•S 3067 IS 

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.12.07, as 

2 added by subsection (a), is amended— 

3 (A) by striking ‘‘Free’’ and inserting 

4 ‘‘1.25%’’; and 

5 (B) by striking ‘‘On or before 12/31/2008’’ 

6 and inserting ‘‘On or before 12/31/2009’’. 

7 (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made 

8 by paragraph (1) shall take effect on January 1, 

9 2009. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2981 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-Aminothiophenol. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 23, 2006 

Mr. ISAKSON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-Aminothiophenol. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2-AMINOTHIOPHENOL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.38.20 2-Aminothiophenol (CAS No. 137–07–5) 

(provided for in subheading (2930.90.29) Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•S 2981 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
Exhibit
32.1
 
 
 STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Phoenix Energy Resource,
Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Rene Ronald Soullier,
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify
that:
 
 * the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 * the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 
 PHOENIX ENERGY RESOURCE, INC.
                (Registrant)Date: October
      13, 2009
              By:
              /s/ Rene Ronald
    SoullierRene
      Ronald Soullier
                Chief
      Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
  Officer
 
 
 This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation

Part 213 - SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES

Part 214 - SEALED BIDDING

Part 215 - CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION

Part 216 - TYPES OF CONTRACTS

Part 217 - SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS

Part 218 - EMERGENCY ACQUISITIONS

Parent topic: Subchapter C - CONTRACTING METHODS AND CONTRACT TYPES
38.101 General.       (a) The Federal Supply Schedule program, pursuant to 41 U.S.C.152(3), provides Federal agencies with a simplified process of acquiring commercial supplies and commercial services in varying quantities while obtaining volume discounts. Indefinite-delivery contracts are awarded using competitive procedures to firms. The firms provide supplies and services at stated prices for given periods of time, for delivery within a stated geographic area such as the 48 contiguous states, the District of Columbia, Alaska, Hawaii, and overseas. The schedule contracting office issues Federal Supply Schedule publications that contain a general overview of the Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) program and address pertinent topics.                                          (b) Each schedule identifies agencies that are required to use the contracts as primary sources of supply.                                          (c) Federal agencies not identified in the schedules as mandatory users may issue orders under the schedules. Contractors are encouraged to accept the orders.                                          (d) Although GSA awards most Federal Supply Schedule contracts, it may authorize other agencies to award schedule contracts and publish schedules. For example, the Department of Veterans Affairs awards schedule contracts for certain medical and nonperishable subsistence items.                                          (e) When establishing Federal Supply Schedules, GSA, or an agency delegated that authority, is responsible for complying with all applicable statutory and regulatory requirements (*e.g.,*                   parts  5, 6, and 19). The requirements of parts 5, 6, and 19 apply at the acquisition planning stage prior to issuing the schedule solicitation and, generally, do not apply to orders and BPAs placed under resulting schedule contracts (except see 8.404 and 8.405-5).    **Parent topic:** Subpart 38.1 - Federal Supply Schedule Program
§ 6.6 Submission of recommendations under section 22. ( a ) The Administrator shall make a report to the Secretary upon the completion of each investigation made by him pursuant to § 6.4(a). The report shall summarize the information disclosed by the investigation; shall contain the recommendations of the Administrator; and, in case action under section 22 is recommended, shall be accompanied by a suggested letter from the Secretary to the President recommending that the Tariff Commission be directed to conduct an investigation. Such report shall be submitted to the other offices, agencies, and bureaus of the Department of Agriculture whose activities would be affected, for concurrence or comment.
( b ) The Secretary will recommend that the President direct the Tariff Commission to conduct an investigation under section 22 only if he has reason to believe, upon the basis of the information available to him, that import quotas or fees should be imposed.
52.211-17 Delivery of Excess Quantities.       As prescribed in 11.703(b), insert the following clause:          Delivery of Excess Quantities (Sept 1989)          The Contractor is responsible for the delivery of each item quantity within allowable variations, if any. If the Contractor delivers and the Government receives quantities of any item in excess of the quantity called for (after considering any allowable variation in quantity), such excess quantities will be treated as being delivered for the convenience of the Contractor. The Government may retain such excess quantities up to $250 in value without compensating the Contractor therefor, and the Contractor waives all right, title, or interests therein. Quantities in excess of $250 will, at the option of the Government, either be returned at the Contractor’s expense or retained and paid for by the Government at the contract unit price.          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.211 [Reserved]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6766
DAVID A. DAVIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus HERBERT NUSBAUM, Officer, Commanding Officer II; RALPH BRADLE, Officer, Commanding Officer II, PAUL SHELTON, Officer, Commanding Officer II; M. KAETZEL, Officer, Commanding OfficerII; BRIAN W. CUSTER, Officer, Commanding Officer I; JOSEPH P. SACCTEH, Warden; DONALD HORNING, Warden; RODERICK R. SOWERS, Chief, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA98-3777-S) Submitted: September 9, 1999 Decided: September 15, 1999 Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David A. Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: David A. Davis appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Davis v. Nusbaum , No. CA-98-3777-S (D. Md. May 26, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 407 Filed 10/17/2007 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 31.1
**Section 302 Certification of Principal Executive Officer**
I, William J. Gervais, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of QualstarCorporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) [Paragraph (b) is omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and34-47986]  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.   Date: November 12, 2004      /S/ William J. Gervais  William J. Gervais, Chief Executive Officer
18
52.208-4 Vehicle Lease Payments.       As prescribed in 8.1104(a), insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts for leasing motor vehicles, unless the motor vehicles are leased in foreign countries:          Vehicle Lease Payments (Apr 1984)                                       (a) 						            Upon the submission of proper invoices or vouchers, the Government shall pay rent for each vehicle at the rate(s) specified in this contract.                                          (b) 						            Rent shall accrue from the beginning of this contract, or from the date each vehicle is delivered to the Government, whichever is later, and shall continue until the expiration of the contract term or the termination of this contract. However, rent shall accrue only for the period that each vehicle is in the possession of the Government.                                          (c) 						            Rent shall not accrue for any vehicle that the Contracting Officer determines does not comply with the Condition of Leased Vehicles clause of this contract or otherwise does not comply with the requirements of this contract, until the vehicle is replaced or the defects are corrected.                                          (d) 						            Rent shall not accrue for any vehicle during any period when the vehicle is unavailable or unusable as a result of the Contractor’s failure to render services for the operation and maintenance of the vehicle as prescribed by this contract.                                          (e) 						            Rent stated in monthly terms shall be prorated on the basis of 1/30 th of the monthly rate for each day the vehicle is in the Government’s possession. If this contract contains a mileage provision, the Government shall pay rent as provided in the Schedule.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.208 [Reserved]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

National Defense Intelligence College, Defense Intelligence Agency, Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice of Closed Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the provisions of Subsection (d) of Section 10 of Public Law 92-463, as amended by section 5 of Public Law 94-409, notice is hereby given that a closed meeting of the Defense Intelligence Agency National Defense Intelligence College Board of Visitors has been scheduled as follows:

# DATES:

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 (8 a.m. to 5 p.m.), and Wednesday, January 19, 2011 (8 a.m. to 12 p.m.).

# ADDRESSES:

National Defense Intelligence College, Washington, DC 20340-5100.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. David R. Ellison, President, DIA National Defense Intelligence College, Washington, DC 20340-5100 (202-231-3344).

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The entire meeting is devoted to the discussion of classified information as defined in Section 552b(c)(1), Title 5 of the U.S. Code and therefore will be closed. The Board will discuss several current critical intelligence issues and advise the Director, DIA, as to the successful accomplishment of the mission assigned to the National Defense Intelligence College.

Dated: November 30, 2010.

Morgan F. Park,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 2010-30723 Filed 12-7-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
252.247-7001 Reserved.

Parent topic: 252.247 RESERVED
Subpart 235.70 - Reserved

Parent topic: Part 235 - RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING
46.801 Applicability.

(a) This subpart does not apply to commercial products and commercial services. This subpart

applies to contracts other than those for—

(1)Information technology, including telecommunications;

(2)Construction;

(3)Architect-engineer services; and

(4)Maintenance and rehabilitation of real property.

(b) See subpart 46.7, Warranties, for policies and procedures concerning contractor liability caused

by nonconforming technical data.

Parent topic: Subpart 46.8 - Contractor Liability for Loss of or Damage to Property of the

Government
DAVID MALONEY,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY 

SAFETY AND MOTOR 

VEHICLES,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-5661

Opinion filed June 5, 2017.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari – Original Jurisdiction.

Eilam Isaak, Isaak Law, PLLC, Tampa, for Petitioner.

Christie S. Utt, General Counsel, Natalia Costea, Assistant General Counsel,

Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, Miami, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is DENIED on the merits. 

ROBERTS, C.J., LEWIS, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY

ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Eye Care centers of America, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David E. McComas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

May 14, 2007



/s/ David E. McComas David E. McComasChief Executive Officer


A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO EYE CARE CENTERS OF
AMERICA, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY EYE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
#### David Charles Jones, Jr., Appellant, v Jessica A. Bill et al., Respondents.

Submitted July 25, 2007;

decided October 23, 2007

Reported below, 34 AD3d 741.

*955Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order that affirmed the dismissal of plaintiffs amended complaint against DCFS Trust granted; motion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the remaining portion of the Appellate Division order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
#### § 769.168 Exceptions.

The Agency may grant an exception to any of the requirements of this subpart if the proposed change is in the best financial interest of the Government and not inconsistent with the authorizing law or any other applicable law.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

JEFFREY LYNN BELT,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 3:20cv5892-MCR-EMT

FBI, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

O R D E R

The chief magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on January 

26, 2021. ECF No. 8. The parties were furnished a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, 

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all 

timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed 

objections thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be 

adopted.

Case 3:20-cv-05892-MCR-EMT Document 9 Filed 06/10/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:20cv5892-MCR-EMT

Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 8,

is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to 

comply with an order of the court and failure to prosecute. 

3. The clerk of court is directed to close the file. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 10th day of June 2021.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-05892-MCR-EMT Document 9 Filed 06/10/21 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT B 

Case 3:20-cv-05887-RV-EMT Document 1-2 Filed 10/19/20 Page 1 of 3
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 1st 

JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR 

OKALOOSA COUNTY, FLORIDA 

Case No. 2020 CA 001637 F 

PATRICIA MORRIS, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

THE PEP BOYS-MANNY, MOE & JACK, INC., 

and RI SE, LLC, 

Defendants. 

________________________________________/

DEFENDANTS JOINT NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL 

Defendants THE PEP BOYS-MANNY, MOE & JACK, INC., and RI SE, LLC, hereby 

provide notice that a Notice of Removal in the above-styled cause of action has been filed with 

the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida, Pensacola 

Division. A true and correct copy of the Notice of Removal is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and 

is being filed herewith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332, 1441and 1446, the latter of which 

provides that upon removal “the state court shall proceed no further unless and until the case is 

remanded.” 

Case 3:20-cv-05887-RV-EMT Document 1-2 Filed 10/19/20 Page 2 of 3
2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HERBY CERTIFY that on this 19th day of October, 2020, I electronically filed the 

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court by using the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal, which will 

send a Notice of Service of Court Documents to: Wyatt M. Oakley, Esq., of Morgan & Morgan, 

PLLC, Counsel for Plaintiff, 220 W. Garden Street, 9th Floor, Pensacola, FL 32502 (Email: 

woakley@forthepeople.com; wmoservice@forthepeople.com;). 

 

CLYDE & CO US LLP 

Counsel for The Pep-Boys-Manny, 

Moe & Jack, Inc. and RISE, LLC 

1221 Brickell Avenue, Suite1600 

Miami, FL 33131 

Tel: 305-446-2646 

Fax: 305-441-2374 

By: /s/ Daniel B. Weiss

FREDERICK J. FEIN 

Fla. Bar No. 813699 

Email: fred.fein@clydeco.us

Secondary: kathi.burnham@clydeco.us

Secondary: eservice@clydeco.us 

DANIEL B. WEISS 

Fla. Bar No. 021335 

Email: dan.weiss@clydeco.us

Secondary: johana.socorro@clydeco.us

Secondary: eservice@clydeco.us

Case 3:20-cv-05887-RV-EMT Document 1-2 Filed 10/19/20 Page 3 of 3