alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, William J. Gervais, Chief Executive Officer of Qualstar Corporation (the
Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|(1) |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter
ended December 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.                                                                                               

Dated: February 13, 2004

| |                                           
| | ------------------------------------------
| | /s/WILLIAM J. GERVAIS                     
| |                                           
| | William J. Gervais
Chief Executive Officer

21
Exhibit 31.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Michelle Maresova, certify that:  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Greenleaf Forest Products, Inc.;  1. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;  2. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  3. I am the Companys certifying officer and am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company is made known to me, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the Company's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  4. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company's auditors:  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control over financial reporting.   Date: August 3, 2007 By:/s/   Michelle Maresova Name:  Michelle Maresova Title: Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
3.503-1 Policy.       10 U.S.C. 4655                              and 41 U.S.C. 4704 require that subcontractors not be unreasonably precluded from making direct sales to the Government of any supplies or services made or furnished under a contract. However, this does not preclude contractors from asserting rights that are otherwise authorized by law or regulation.    **Parent topic:** 3.503 Unreasonable restrictions on subcontractor sales.
#### McCALLISTER, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

September 28, 1906.)

Action by Catherine T. McCallister against the city of New York.

No opinion. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Centenary International Corporation
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carlos
      Fabian De Sousa, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)  the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Carlos Fabian De SousaCarlos
                Fabian De Sousa
              Chief
                Financial Officer
              April
                30, 2008


A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing
      certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q solely pursuant to
      section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and are not being
      filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure
      document.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I,Mark Mareske, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

 

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-Q/A of Logan County BancShares, Inc.;

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.   The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:

 

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b)Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.   The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a)  All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date:  November 24, 2004 | /s/  Mark Mareske        |   |
|--------------------------|--------------------------|--------|
|                     | Mark  Mareske            |
|                     | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
§ 764.231 Conservation loan uses. ( a ) CL funds may be used for any conservation activities included in a conservation or Forestry Service Stewardship Management Plan, including but not limited to: ( 1 ) The installation of conservation structures to address soil, water, and related resources;
( 2 ) The establishment of forest cover for sustained yield timber management, erosion control, or shelter belt purposes;
( 3 ) The installation of water conservation measures;
( 4 ) The installation of waste management systems;
( 5 ) The establishment or improvement of permanent pasture; and
( 6 ) Other purposes including the adoption of any other emerging or existing conservation practices, techniques, or technologies.
( b ) [Reserved]
[75 FR 54015, Sept. 3, 2010, as amended at 77 FR 15938, Mar. 19, 2012]
DISMISS and Opinion Filed April 11, 2019 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-18-01428-CV
JP BENT TREE GP, LLC, JP ABERDEEN GP, LLC AND JP-2400 LAKESIDE GP, LLC, Appellants V. RE CLOSING, LLC AND REC GP, LLC, Appellees

On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-14634



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Schenck , Osborne, and Reichek Opinion by Justice Reichek Before the Court is appellant s’ April 2, 2019 unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal in
which appellants assert they have nonsuited their case below wi thout prejudice, rendering the
appeal moot. We grant appellants’ motion and dismiss the appea l. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1).

181428F.P05 /Amanda L. Reichek/ AMANDA L. REICHEK JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT

JP BENT TREE GP, LLC, JP ABERDEEN GP, LLC AND JP-2400 LAKESIDE GP, LLC, Appellants

No. 05-18-01428-CV V.

RE CLOSING, LLC AND REC GP, LLC, Appellees On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-14634. Opinion delivered by Justice Reichek; Justices Schenck and Os borne participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appe al is DISMISSED

.
It is ORDERED that appellees RE CLOSING, LLC AND REC GP, LLC recover their costs of this appeal from appell ants JP BENT TREE GP, LLC, JP A BERDEEN GP, LLC AND JP-2400 LAKESIDE GP, LLC.

Judgment entered April 11, 2019.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and Condensed Consolidated Statement of
Income filed as part of Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           OCT-2-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              OCT-4-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                APR-3-1998
<CASH>                                          33,737
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  548,966
<ALLOWANCES>                                    22,880
<INVENTORY>                                    370,671
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,056,589
<PP&E>                                       1,714,300
<DEPRECIATION>                                 852,601
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,805,839
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          962,500
<BONDS>                                      1,210,822
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           234
<OTHER-SE>                                     395,911
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,805,839
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,182,875
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,903,042
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                97,002
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,374
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              53,846
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 85,409
<INCOME-TAX>                                    36,674
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             48,735
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (1,559)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    47,176
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.14 <F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.08 <F1>
        
<FN>
(1) Earnings per share have been prepared in accordance with SFAS No. 128,
"Earnings Per Share" and therefore basic and diluted earnings per share have 
been entered in place of primary and fully diluted EPS, respectively.
</FN>

</TABLE>
52.106 [Reserved]

Parent topic: Subpart 52.1 - Instructions for Using Provisions and Clauses
§ 760.808 General provisions. ( a ) For calculations of loss, the participant's existing unit structure will be used as the basis for the calculation established in accordance with: ( 1 ) For insured crops, part 457 of this title; or
( 2 ) For NAP covered crops, part 1437 of this title.
( b ) County average yield for loss calculations will be the average of the 2001 through 2005 official county yields established by FSA, excluding the years with the highest and lowest yields, respectively.
( c ) County committees will assign production or reduce the historic yield when the county committee determines: ( 1 ) An acceptable appraisal or record of harvested production does not exist;
( 2 ) The loss is due to an ineligible cause of loss or practices, soil type, climate, or other environmental factors that cause lower yields than those upon which the historic yield is based;
( 3 ) The participant has a contract providing a guaranteed payment for all or a portion of the crop; or
( 4 ) The crop was planted beyond the normal planting period for the crop.
( d ) The county committee will establish a maximum average loss level that reflects the amount of production producers would have produced if not for the eligible damaging weather or related conditions in the area or county for the same crop. The maximum average loss level for the county will be expressed as either a percent of loss or yield per acre. The maximum average loss level will apply when: ( 1 ) Unharvested acreage has not been appraised by FSA, or a company reinsured by FCIC; or
( 2 ) Acceptable production records for harvested acres are not available from any source.
( e ) Assignment of production or reduction in yield will apply for practices that result in lower yields than those for which the historic yield is based.
252.236-7002 Obstruction of Navigable Waterways.       As prescribed in                 236.570             (b)(1), use the following clause:          OBSTRUCTION OF NAVIGABLE WATERWAYS (DEC 1991)          (a)  The Contractor shall—          (1)  Promptly recover and remove any material, plant, machinery, or appliance which the contractor loses, dumps, throws overboard, sinks, or misplaces, and which, in the opinion of the Contracting Officer, may be dangerous to or obstruct navigation;          (2)  Give immediate notice, with description and locations of any such obstructions, to the Contracting Officer; and          (3)  When required by the Contracting Officer, mark or buoy such obstructions until the same are removed.          (b)  The Contracting Officer may—          (1)  Remove the obstructions by contract or otherwise should the Contractor refuse, neglect, or delay compliance with paragraph (a) of this clause; and          (2)  Deduct the cost of removal from any monies due or to become due to the Contractor; or          (3)  Recover the cost of removal under the Contractor's bond.          (c)  The Contractor's liability for the removal of a vessel wrecked or sunk without fault or negligence is limited to that provided in Sections 15, 19, and 20 of the River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 410 *et. seq.*).          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 252.236 RESERVED
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3052 

To suspend temporarily the duty on synthetic staple fiber of polyester having 

a scalloped oval cross section. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. CARPER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on synthetic staple fiber 

of polyester having a scalloped oval cross section. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SYNTHETIC STAPLE FIBER OF POLYESTER 

4 HAVING A SCALLOPED OVAL CROSS SECTION. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


sroberts on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•S 3052 IS 

‘‘ 9902.55.04 Synthetic staple fibers of polyester, from 

a patented tow comprised of fibers having a scallped oval cross section with 

four channels, measuring 1.2 to 1.7 

decitex (provided for in subheading 

5503.20.00) ............................................. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Subpart 250.0 - Reserved

Parent topic: Part 250 - EXTRAORDINARY CONTRACTUAL ACTIONS
Subpart 232.72 - Reserved

Parent topic: Part 232 - CONTRACT FINANCING
#### Pattison-Bolson Rug Service, Inc., Respondent, v. W. & J. Sloane, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Appeal by defendant W. & J. Sloane (1) from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 8, 1970, as granted plaintiff’s motion to restore the action to the Trial Calendar and (2) from an alleged second order of the same court dated the same day purportedly denying said defendant’s motion for reargument. Appeal from the alleged order dismissed without costs. The record herein does not disclose the entry of such order. In any event, an order denying reargument is not appealable. Order dated January 8, 1970, which granted plaintiff’s motion, modified, on the law and the facts and in the interests of justice, by striking therefrom the second ordering paragraph and substituting therefor the following paragraph: “ Ordered that the clerk of this court, upon service of a copy of this order upon him with proof of completion of all pretrial and preliminary proceedings, is directed to place this action upon the trial calendar of this court, provided that plaintiff shall also file with said clerk proof that notice was served on defendants that plaintiff claims such proceedings are complete and the clerk will be requested to place the action upon the trial calendar.” As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from without costs. Under the circumstances presented, defendant W. & J. Sloane, Inc., is entitled to a reasonable opportunity to examine plaintiff before trial and to use the disclosure procedures provided by the CPLR. These procedures should be initiated within 10 days after entry of the order hereon; and the trial should be held in due course after the completion of the disclosure procedures. The delay in the action has so far been considerable and the parties should proceed with dispatch. Christ, P. J., Hopkins, Munder and Brennan, JJ., concur; Rabin, J., concurs in the dismissal of the appeal from the alleged order denying reargument, but otherwise dissents and votes to affirm the order of January 8, 1970 insofar as appealed from.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA *

PLAINTIFF *

*

v. * CR. NO. 2:06-CR-00169

*

WILLIAM EARL ULMER, *

DEFENDANT *

MOTION TO EXTEND PRE-TRIAL MOTION CUTOFF DATE

Comes now Defendant William Earl Ulmer through counsel and moves the Court to

extend the date by which pretrial motions must be filed pursuant to the Court’s Order on

Arraignment and for cause states as follows:

1. According to the Court’s Order on Arraignment, pretrial motions are to be filed on or

before March 30, 2007.

2. The indictment in this case lists 14 Defendants. 

3. Counsel for Defendant has ordered the discovery as submitted to Pro Legal Copies of

Montgomery, Inc. which consists of: 7,428 pages of documents, 10 DVDs, 19 CDs, 1 floppy

disc, 6 videos, and 23 cassette tapes. 

4. Counsel for Defendant will be out of town from March 16 through March 23 .

th rd

5. The discovery materials are presently scheduled for delivery to counsel’s office on

March 23, 2007 upon his return from Virginia.

6 In order to provide a proper defense, it will be necessary for counsel to review the

discovery prior to assessing whether or not any pretrial motions are necessary. Due to the

voluminous discovery in this case, there simply is not sufficient time to review the discovery and

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 130 Filed 03/16/2007 Page 1 of 3
make a proper assessment.

Wherefore the above matters considered, Defendant prays this Court grant his motion and

extend the time within which he has to file pre-trial motions by thirty days.

Respectfully submitted this day, March 16, 2007.

/s/Timothy C. Halstrom 

Timothy C. Halstrom

Bar Number HAL021

Attorney for Defendant William Earl Ulmer

Of Counsel:

Timothy C. Halstrom

Bar # HAL021

Attorney At Law

4170 Lomac Street

Montgomery, Alabama 36106

(334)272-6464

(334)244-7474 - fax

halstromtim@aol.com - email

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 130 Filed 03/16/2007 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on March 16, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk

of the Court using CM/ECF system which will send notification tot he parties.:

/s/Timothy C. Halstrom 

Timothy C. Halstrom

Bar Number HAL021

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 130 Filed 03/16/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 3:03-cr-00135-LC Document 49 Filed 10/18/16 Page 1 of 1