alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-33 (d)
Report on Assessment of Compliance

with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria

1.      The undersigned authorized officer of LandAmerica Tax and Flood
Services, Inc. (the "Company") is responsible for assessing the Company's
compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as defined in 17 CFR Part 229
Section 1122(d) (4) (xi) and 1122(d) (4) (xii) (the "Regulation AB Servicing
Criteria") for residential mortgage backed securities for which the Company
served as third-party property tax payment provider on the underlying collateral
(the "Platform"). Except as set forth in the preceding sentence, the servicing
criteria set forth in 17 CFR Part 229 Section 1122(d) are not applicable to the
activities the Company performed with respect to the Platform.

2.      The Company used the criteria in 17 CFR Part 229 Section 1122(d) to
assess the compliance with the Regulation AB Servicing Criteria.

3.      Under one of the services offered by the Company, some customers may
elect to remit tax payments directly to tax agencies without having the Company
remit those property tax payments through our tax payment service. We refer to
these customers as "non-outsourced servicer customers." With respect to these
non-outsourced customers and the services the Company delivered pursuant to the
servicing criteria set forth in 17 CFR Part 229 Section 1122(d)(4)(xi), the
Company's assertion is strictly limited to its processing of tax payments
submitted through the Company's tax payment service.

4.      With respect to servicing criteria set forth in 17 CFR Part 229 Section
1122(d)(4)(xii), the Company's assertion is strictly limited to its processing
of property tax penalty payments. The Company has determined that its servicer
customers may also have access to systems that enable those servicers to process
penalties through obligor escrow accounts. Management's assessment of compliance
does not relate to the actual or potential activities of other parties with
access to obligor escrow accounts.

5.      Based on such assessment, management believes that, as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2006, the Company has complied in all material respects
with the Regulation AB Servicing Criteria related to the servicing of the
Platform.

6.      The registered public accounting firm of Grant Thornton, LLP, has issued
an attestation report on the Company's assessment of compliance with the
Regulation AB Servicing Criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Date: February 20, 2007

LandAmerica Tax and Flood Services, Inc.


By:   /s/ Bob Ige
Name: Bob Ige
Its:  Executive Vice President
```

[Federal Register: July 1, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 126)]
[Notices]               
[Page 38087]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr01jy10-52]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

 
Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday July 23, 2010.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

Contact Person for More Information: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-16190 Filed 6-29-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
52.242-5 Payments to Small Business

Subcontractors.

As prescribed in 42.1504 , insert the following clause:

Payments to Small Business Subcontractors (Jan 2017)

(a) Definitions. As used in this clauseReduced payment means a payment that is for less than the amount agreed upon in a subcontract in

accordance with its terms and conditions, for supplies and services for which the Government has

paid the prime contractor.

Untimely payment means a payment that is more than 90 days past due under the terms and

conditions of a subcontract, for supplies and services for which the Government has paid the prime

contractor.

(b) Notice. The Contractor shall notify the Contracting Officer, in writing, not later than 14 days

after-

(1) A small business subcontractor was entitled to payment under the terms and conditions of the

subcontract; and

(2) The Contractor-

(i) Made a reduced or untimely payment to the small business subcontractor; or

(ii) Failed to make a payment, which is now untimely.

(c) Content of notice. The Contractor shall include the reason(s) for making the reduced or untimely

payment in any notice required under paragraph (b) of this clause.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.242 [Reserved]
# 52.226 [Reserved]

- 52.226-1 Utilization of Indian Organizations and Indian-Owned Economic Enterprises. 
- 52.226-2 Historically Black College or University and Minority Institution Representation. 
- 52.226-3 Disaster or Emergency Area Representation. 
- 52.226-4 Notice of Disaster or Emergency Area Set-Aside. 
- 52.226-5 Restrictions on Subcontracting Outside Disaster or Emergency Area. 
- 52.226-6 Promoting Excess Food Donation to Nonprofit Organizations. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 52.2 - Text of Provisions and Clauses
52.000 Scope of part.

This part-

(a) Gives instructions for using provisions and clauses in solicitations and/or contracts;

(b) Sets forth the solicitation provisions and contract clauses prescribed by this regulation; and

(c) Presents a matrix listing the FAR provisions and clauses applicable to each principal contract

type and/or purpose (e.g., fixed-price supply, cost-reimbursement research and development).

Parent topic: Part 52 - Solicitation Provisions and Contract Clauses
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Michael D. Picchi, certify that:

1.        I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Comverge, Inc.;

2.         Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

April 10, 2009

 

/s/ Michael D. Picchi

Michael D. Picchi

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


February 28, 2018


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust 368 (the “Fund”)


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for the Fund, consisting of the unit investment trust (the “Trust”) included in
the Registration Statement relating to the Fund. We enclosed a list of the securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date
hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such securities as of close of business on February 27, 2018, in
accordance with the valuation method set forth in the applicable Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreement. We
consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations of the Trust securities in the
Registration Statement (No. 333-221858) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the registration of the
sale of the Units of the Trust and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


Very truly yours,


 


	 /s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO




Gerardo Cipriano


Vice President
#### § 763.2 Abbreviations and definitions.

Abbreviations and definitions for terms used in this part are in § 761.2 of this chapter.
# L_2014019EN.01000701.xml

| 22.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 19/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 19/7

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation 2014/42/EU of 20 January 2014 amending Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 15 of 20 January 2014
  )

On the cover, in the table of contents:

for:

‘2014/42/EU

Council Regulation of 20 January 2014 amending Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran’,

read:

‘Council Regulation (EU) No 42/2014 of 20 January 2014 amending Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran’;

on page 18, in the title:

for:

‘COUNCIL REGULATION

of 20 January 2014

amending Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran

(2014/42/EU)’,

read:

‘COUNCIL REGULATION (EU) No 42/2014

of 20 January 2014

amending Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran’.

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 1:98-cr-00019-MP-AK

RONALD ALLAN COHEN,

Defendant.

________________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 1546, Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge, which recommends that Ground Two of Defendant’s Motion to Vacate, Doc.

1421, be denied. The Magistrate Judge filed the Report and Recommendation on Tuesday,

February 12, 2008. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and have been afforded

an opportunity to file objections. Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1),

this Court must make a de novo review of those portions to which an objection has been made. 

In this instance, however, no objections have been filed.

In the remaining ground of his motion to vacate, Defendant alleges that counsel’s

performance was constitutionally deficient. After reviewing each allegation of ineffective

assistance, the Magistrate concludes that Defendant’s claims are without merit, and that the

motion to vacate should be denied. Many of the issues raised by Defendant have already been

rejected on their merits by the Eleventh Circuit on direct appeal of this case, and Defendant

cannot show any resulting prejudice from the remaining allegations of ineffective assistance.

Therefore, having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the lack of objections

thereto, I have determined that it should be adopted. Accordingly, it is hereby

Case 1:98-cr-00019-MP-AK Document 1550 Filed 03/14/08 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 1:98-cr-00019-MP-AK

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted and

incorporated herein.

2. Ground Two of Defendant’s Motion to Vacate, Doc. 1421, is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 14th day of March, 2008

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:98-cr-00019-MP-AK Document 1550 Filed 03/14/08 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1999, AND THE STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       2,190,100
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,700
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       7,258,100
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,238,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,706,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          282,800
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,706,200
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,380,900
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,732,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (68,700)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                10,500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                704,400
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            704,400
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   704,400
<EPS-BASIC>                                      23.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
31.002 Availability of accounting guide.       Contractors needing assistance in developing or improving their accounting systems and procedures may request a copy of the Defense Contract Audit Agency Pamphlet No.7641.90, Information for Contractors. The pamphlet is available via the Internet at http://www.dcaa.mil.    **Parent topic:** Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures
252.216-7003 Economic Price

Adjustment—Wage Rates or Material Prices

Controlled by a Foreign Government.

As prescribed in 216.203-4-70(c)(1), use the following clause:

Economic Price Adjustment - Wage Rates or Material Prices Controlled by a Foreign Government

(MAR 2012)

(a) As represented by the Contractor in its offer, the prices set forth in this contract -

(1) Are based on the wage rates or material prices established and controlled by the government of

the country specified by the Contractor in its offer; and

(2) Do not include contingency allowances to pay for possible increases in wage rates or material

prices.

(b) If wage rates or material prices are revised by the government named in paragraph (a) of this

clause, the Contracting Officer shall make an equitable adjustment in the contract price and shall

modify the contract to the extent that the Contractor's actual costs of performing this contract are

increased or decreased, as a direct result of the revision, subject to the following:

(1) For increases in established wage rates or material prices, the increase in contract unit price(s)

shall be effective on the same date that the government named in paragraph (a) of this clause

increased the applicable wage rate(s) or material price(s), but only if the Contracting Officer

receives the Contractor's written request for contract adjustment within 10 days of the change. If

the Contractor's request is received later, the effective date shall be the date that the Contracting

Officer received the Contractor's request.

(2) For decreases in established wage rates or material prices, the decrease in contract unit price(s)

shall be effective on the same date that the government named in paragraph (a) of this clause

decreased the applicable wage rate(s) or material price(s). The decrease in contract unit price(s)

shall apply to all items delivered on and after the effective date of the government's rate or price

decrease.

(c) No modification changing the contract unit price(s) shall be executed until the Contracting

Officer has verified the applicable change in the rates or prices set by the government named in

paragraph (a) of this clause. The Contractor shall make available its books and records that support

a requested change in contract price.

(d) Failure to agree to any adjustment shall be a dispute under the Disputes clause of this contract.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 252.216 RESERVED
Page 1 of 2

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

NICOLE BOVE ́,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:03cv312-LC/WCS

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, 

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Pending is Plaintiff's Motion for attorney's fees, filed April 19, 2005 and amended

on April 20, 2005. Docs. 17 and 18. Plaintiff seeks attorney fees pursuant to the EAJA,

28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) in the amount of $3,334.49. Defendant has filed a response to the

application advising the court that they have no objection to the amount requested by

Plaintiff. Doc. 20. 

Case 5:03-cv-00312-LC-WCS Document 21 Filed 05/09/05 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 5:03cv312-LC/WCS

In light of the above, it is RECOMMENDED that:

Plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees, doc. 17 and amended by doc. 18, be

GRANTED and the court order that the Commissioner certify and pay to Plaintiff’s

attorney $3,334.49 as a reasonable fee.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on May 9, 2005.

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 15 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 10

days after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections

limits the scope of review of proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case 5:03-cv-00312-LC-WCS Document 21 Filed 05/09/05 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Report of Cadiscor Resources Inc. (the Company) on Form 10K-SB for the period ending December 31, 2006, which contains the Companys financial statements audited for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Michel Bouchard, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Michel Bouchard __________________ Michel Bouchard President and Chief Executive Officer  March 26, 2007
§ 760.633 2008 SURE guarantee calculation. ( a ) For a participant who is eligible due to the 2008 buy-in waiver for risk management purchase under the provisions of § 760.105(c), the SURE guarantee for their farm for the 2008 crop will be calculated according to § 760.631, or according to § 760.634 for value loss crops, with the exception that the: ( 1 ) Price election in § 760.631(a)(1)(i) is 100 percent of the NAP established price for the crop;
( 2 ) Coverage level in § 760.631(a)(1)(iv) is 70 percent; and
( 3 ) The percent specified in § 760.631(a)(2)(iv) is 70 percent instead of 50 percent; and
( 4 ) Coverage level used in § 760.634(a)(1)(ii) is 70 percent; and
( 5 ) The percent specified in § 760.634(a)(2)(ii) is 70 percent instead of 50 percent.
( b ) For those 2008 crops that meet the requirements of §§ 760.104, 760.105(a), 760.106, or 760.107, the SURE guarantee will be the higher of: ( 1 ) The guarantee calculated according to § 760.631, or according to § 760.634 for value loss crops, with the exception that the percent specified in §§ 760.631(a)(1) and 760.634(a)(1) will be 120 percent instead of 115 percent;
( 2 ) The guarantee calculated according to § 760.631, or according to § 760.634 for value loss crops, will be used with the exception that the: ( i ) Price election in § 760.631(a)(1)(i) is 100 percent of the NAP established price for the crop; and
( ii ) Coverage level in §§ 760.631(a)(1)(iv) and 760.634(a)(1)(ii) will be 70 percent; and
( iii ) The percent specified in §§ 760.631(a)(2)(iv) and 760.634(a)(2)(ii) will be 70 percent instead of 50 percent.
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 8 Filed 10/02/2006 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 8 Filed 10/02/2006 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 8 Filed 10/02/2006 Page 3 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 8 Filed 10/02/2006 Page 4 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 8 Filed 10/02/2006 Page 5 of 5
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Authority:

7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 800.116 How to request original services.

(a) *General.* Except as otherwise provided for in § 800.117, requests for original services shall be filed with an agency or field office authorized to operate in the area in which the original service is to be performed. All requests shall include the information specified in § 800.46. Verbal requests shall be confirmed in writing when requested by official personnel, as specified in § 800.46. Copies of request forms may be obtained from the agency or field office upon request. If the information specified by § 800.46 is not available at the time the request is filed, official personnel may, at their discretion, withhold service pending receipt of the required information. An official certificate shall not be issued unless the information as required by § 800.46 has been submitted, or official personnel determine that sufficient information has been made available so as to perform the requested service. A record that sufficient information was made available must be included in the record of the official service.

(b) *Request requirements.* Except as provided for in § 800.117, requests for original services, other than submitted sample inspections, must be made to the agency or field office responsible for the area in which the service will be provided. Requests for submitted sample inspections may be made with any agency, or any field office that provides original inspection service. Requests for inspection or Class X weighing of grain during loading, unloading, or handling must be received in advance of loading so official personnel can be present. All requests will be considered filed when official personnel receive the request. A record shall be maintained for all requests. All requests for service that is to be performed outside normal business hours must be received by 2 p.m. the preceding day.

(Approved by Office of Management and Budget under control number 0580-0013)

[68 FR 19139, Apr. 18, 2003]
§ 900.115 Hearing. ( a ) The arbitrator shall have full discretion to conduct the hearing in such manner as will, in his opinion, enable him to ascertain all the facts in the case.
( b ) Parties to the dispute may appear in person or by duly accredited agents and may be represented by counsel.
( c ) All relevant and material evidence may be presented. The arbitrator shall not be bound by the legal rules of evidence.
( d ) The arbitrator, in the presence of the parties, may require the production of books and records for examination by himself, but not for examination of confidential information by other parties to the dispute unless the party producing the same consents to its examination by the other parties to the dispute.
( e ) No evidence offered by one party shall be received except in the presence of all parties unless the parties so agree in a submission specifying the nature of the evidence to be received.
( f ) Final determination as to what will be considered confidential information shall be made by the arbitrator.
( g ) The arbitrator may request the opinions of economists, marketing specialists, statisticians, lawyers, accountants, and other experts.
( h ) When more than two arbitrators are designated to hear a dispute, and they disagree, the award of the majority shall be the final award. If the arbitrators are evenly divided, there shall be no award.
( i ) A stenographic record of all the proceedings during an arbitration must be made.