alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 658.6 Technical assistance. ( a ) Section 1543 of the Act, 7 U.S.C. 4204 states, “The Secretary is encouraged to provide technical assistance to any State or unit of local government, or any nonprofit organization, as determined by the Secretary, that desires to develop programs or policies to limit the conversion of productive farmland to nonagricultural uses.” In § 2.62, of 7 CFR part 2, subtitle A, NRCS is delegated leadership responsibility within USDA for the activities treated in this part.
( b ) In providing assistance to States, local units of government, and nonprofit organizations, USDA will make available maps and other soils information from the national cooperative soil survey through NRCS field offices.
( c ) Additional assistance, within available resources, may be obtained from local offices of other USDA agencies. The Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service and the Forest Service can provide aerial photographs, crop history data, and related information. A reasonable fee may be charged. In many States, the Cooperative Extension Service can provide help in understanding and identifying farmland protection issues and problems, resolving conflicts, developing alternatives, deciding on appropriate actions, and implementing those decisions.
( d ) Officials of State agencies, local units of government, nonprofit organizations, or regional, area, State-level, or field offices of Federal agencies may obtain assistance by contacting the office of the NRCS State conservationist. A list of Natural Resources Conservation Service State office locations appears in appendix A, § 661.6 of this title. If further assistance is needed, requests should be made to the Assistant Secretary for Natural Resources and Environment, Office of the Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC 20250.
Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 389 Filed 10/16/2007 Page 1 of 10
Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 389 Filed 10/16/2007 Page 2 of 10
Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 389 Filed 10/16/2007 Page 3 of 10
Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 389 Filed 10/16/2007 Page 4 of 10
Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 389 Filed 10/16/2007 Page 5 of 10
Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 389 Filed 10/16/2007 Page 6 of 10
Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 389 Filed 10/16/2007 Page 7 of 10
Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 389 Filed 10/16/2007 Page 8 of 10
Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 389 Filed 10/16/2007 Page 9 of 10
Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 389 Filed 10/16/2007 Page 10 of 10
Part 5110 - Market Research       *(Revised 27 January 2023)*                                       5110.002 Procedures.    5110.002 Procedures.    (b)  All members of the acquisition team will participate in market research and apply their functional tools and expertise.  Program managers or representatives of the requiring activity will typically lead the market research effort.  A statement that the solicitation will be synopsized and that all proposals received will be evaluated is not a substitute for performing adequate market research and in itself does not support and justify procurement under other than full and open conditions.  Specific requirements pertaining to market research in support of other than full and open competition are included in 5153.303-5, paragraph 8.       See AFARS PGI 5110.002(b)-1 for information and          instructions on using ProcurementIQ, a market intelligence tool specifically designed for          procurement, strategic sourcing and indirect procurement.       Additional market research and planning guidance is available at AFARS PGI 5110.002(b)-2.       (e) The Assistant Secretary of the Army          (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology) shall document the results of market research in a          manner appropriate to the size and complexity of the acquisition as stated at FAR          10.002(e). See Appendix GG for further delegation.       (i) In addition to using the “Market Research Report Guide for Improving the Tradecraft in Services Acquisition”, for service acquisitions, the format and processes should also be adapted for use in documenting market research for supplies. The Office of Small Business Programs tool at:              https://www.dau.edu/tools/t/Services-Acquisition-Market-Research-Report           should be used to develop the Market Research report.
§ 760.305 Eligible grazing losses. ( a ) A grazing loss due to drought is eligible for LFP only if the grazing loss for the covered livestock occurs on land that: ( 1 ) Is native or improved pastureland with permanent vegetative cover or
( 2 ) Is planted to a crop planted specifically for the purpose of providing grazing for covered livestock; and
( 3 ) Is grazing land or pastureland that is owned or leased by the eligible livestock producer that is physically located in a county that is, during the normal grazing period for the specific type of grazing land or pastureland for the county, rated by the U.S. Drought Monitor as having a: ( i ) D2 (severe drought) intensity in any area of the county for at least 8 consecutive weeks during the normal grazing period for the specific type of grazing land or pastureland for the county, as determined by the Secretary, or
( ii ) D3 (extreme drought) or D4 (exceptional drought) intensity in any area of the county at any time during the normal grazing period for the specific type of grazing land or pastureland for the county, as determined by the Secretary. (As specified elsewhere in this subpart, the amount of potential payment eligibility will be higher than under (a)(3)(i) of this section where the D4 trigger applies or where the D3 condition as determined by the Secretary lasts at least 4 weeks during the normal grazing period for the specific type of grazing land or pastureland for the county.)
( b ) A grazing loss is not eligible for LFP if the grazing loss due to drought on land used for haying or grazing under the Conservation Reserve Program established under subchapter B of chapter 1 of subtitle D of title XII of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3831-3835a).
( c ) A fire qualifies for LFP only if: ( 1 ) The grazing loss occurs on rangeland that is managed by a Federal agency and
( 2 ) The eligible livestock producer is prohibited by the Federal agency from grazing the normal permitted livestock on the managed rangeland due to a fire.
( d ) An eligible livestock producer may be eligible for LFP payments only on those grazing lands incurring losses for which the livestock producer: ( 1 ) Meets the risk management purchase requirements specified in § 760.104; or
( 2 ) Does not meet the risk management purchase requirements specified in § 760.104 because the risk management purchase requirement is waived according to §§ 760.105, 760.106, or 760.107.
Case 2:06-cv-00620-WKW-CSC Document 1-6 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, William J. Gervais, Chief Executive Officer of Qualstar Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: May 13, 2010

/s/ WILLIAM J. GERVAISWilliam J. GervaisPrincipal Executive Officer








24
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2863 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2863

            To suspend temporarily the duty on Triadimefon.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 19, 2006

   Mr. Burr introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To suspend temporarily the duty on Triadimefon.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRIADIMEFON.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.10.33      1-(4-               Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         Chlorophenoxy)-                                                    31/2009
                         3,3-dimethyl-1-
                         (1H-1,2,4-triazol-
                         1-y1)-2-butanone
                         (CAS No. 43121-43-
                         3) (Triadimefon)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2933.99.22)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly report of eNucleus, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-QSB/A for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I John C. Paulsen, Chief
Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


     (1)  The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



                                            /s/  John C. Paulsen
                                            --------------------------------
                                                 John C. Paulsen
                                                 Chief Executive Officer and
                                                 Principal Financial and
                                                 Accounting Officer


                                                 January 18, 2005
204.802 Contract files.       (a)  Any document posted to the Electronic Data Access (EDA) system is part of the contract file and is accessible by multiple parties, including the contractor.  Do not include in EDA contract documents that are classified, too sensitive for widespread distribution (e.g., personally identifiable information and Privacy Act and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act), or attachments that cannot be practicably converted to electronic format (e.g., samples, drawings, and models). Inclusion of any document in EDA other than contracts, modifications, and orders is optional.          (f)  A photocopy, facsimile, electronic, mechanically-applied and printed signature, seal, and date are considered to be an original signature, seal, and date.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 204.8 - CONTRACT FILES
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT #32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Outdoor Channel Holdings,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, William A. Owen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
         in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.

/s/ William Owen
-----------------------------------

Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2003

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
     been provided to Outdoor Channel Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by
     Outdoor Channel Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
     Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2799 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2799

  To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-Methoxy-2-methyldiphenylamine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 15, 2006

Mr. Levin (for himself and Ms. Stabenow) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-Methoxy-2-methyldiphenylamine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 4-METHOXY-2-METHYLDIPHENYLAMINE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.05.55      4-Methoxy-2-        Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         methyldiphenylami                                                  31/2009
                         ne (CAS No. 41317-
                         15-1) (provided
                         for in subheading
                         2922.29.60)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING 

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED 

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL 

OF FLORIDA 

SECOND DISTRICT 

MICHAEL A. HAGAN, ) 

 ) 

 Appellant, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Case No. 2D14-1100 

 ) 

STATE OF FLORIDA, ) 

 ) 

 Appellee. ) 

___________________________________ ) 

Opinion filed March 16, 2016. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk 

County; John K. Stargel, Judge. 

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Terrence E. Kehoe, Special Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Wendy Buffington, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, 

for Appellee. 

SILBERMAN, Judge. 

 Michael A. Hagan seeks review of his judgment and sentences for 

tampering with evidence and second-degree murder. We affirm Hagan's convictions 

without comment. As for Hagan's challenge to his sentences, we reverse for the sole 

purpose of amending the sentences to reflect the relief granted pursuant to his motion 

to correct sentencing error. 
- 2 -

 At the sentencing hearing, the trial court orally pronounced sentences of 

life in prison with a twenty-five-year mandatory minimum for second-degree murder and 

five years in prison for tampering with evidence. The court imposed the life sentence 

consecutive to the five-year sentence. However, the written sentence reverses the 

designation and imposes the five-year sentence consecutive to the life sentence. After 

the notice of appeal was filed, Hagan filed a motion to correct sentencing error pursuant 

to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b) in which he argued that the written 

sentence fails to comport with the court's oral pronouncement. The trial court granted 

relief on this basis and ordered that the written sentence be corrected to designate the 

life sentence as consecutive to the five-year sentence. Despite these directions, an 

amended sentence has not yet been entered. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for 

the entry of an amended sentence reflecting the relief granted. 

 Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. 

 

LaROSE and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               Jun-30-2000
<CASH>                                             464
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,629
<ALLOWANCES>                                        54
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,307
<PP&E>                                           1,916
<DEPRECIATION>                                      40
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,752
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,560
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,655
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,752
<SALES>                                          6,313
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,313
<CGS>                                            5,150
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,841
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,650
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (8,328)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (8,328)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.74)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.74)



</TABLE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING 

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED 

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL 

OF FLORIDA 

SECOND DISTRICT 

McKENZIE LEROY LUNSFORD, ) 

 ) 

 Appellant, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Case No. 2D13-2670 

 ) 

STATE OF FLORIDA, ) 

 ) 

 Appellee. ) 

 ) 

Opinion filed July 9, 2014. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas 

County; Chris Helinger, Judge. 

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and 

Pamela H. Izakowitz, Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Wendy Buffington, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee. 

BLACK, Judge. 

 We affirm McKenzie Lunsford's convictions and sentences without 

comment. However, we remand for entry of a corrected judgment reflecting that 
- 2 -

Lunsford pleaded only to counts 1, 2, and 3, and was convicted after a jury trial of 

counts 4 and 5. See Willingham v. State, 48 So. 3d 173 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010). 

KHOUZAM, J., and BAUMANN, HERBERT J., JR., ASSOCIATE JUDGE, Concur.
#### §§ 765.354-765.400 [Reserved]
###### Editorial Note on Part 782

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 782 appear at 61 FR 32643, June 25, 1996.

#### § 782.3 Administration.

The end-use certificate program will be administered under the general supervision and direction of the Administrator, Farm Service Agency (FSA), U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), through the Office of the Deputy Administrator for Commodity Operations (DACO), FSA, Washington, D.C., and the Kansas City Commodity Office (KCCO), FSA, Kansas City, MO, in coordination with the Commissioner of Customs pursuant to a Memorandum of Understanding.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

FREDDY LEE BROWN,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 5:03-cv-00252-MP-EMT

CHARLIE CRIST, JAMES CROSBY,

Respondents.

___________________________/

O R D E R 

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 17, Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge, recommending that Doc. 14, Respondent's Amended Motion to Dismiss as

Untimely be granted and that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be dismissed with prejudice

as untimely. The time for filing objections to Report and Recommendation has passed, but none

have been filed. Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the Court agrees that

Petitioner did not file his petition within the time periods set out by 28 U.S.C. § 2244, as

amended by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), and that no

state-court motion tolled the deadlines from AEDPA. Accordingly, it is hereby 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated into this order.

2. The Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss (doc. 14) is granted.

3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1) is dismissed with prejudice as

untimely. The Clerk is directed to close this case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 13th day of June, 2005

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 5:03-cv-00252-MP-EMT Document 21 Filed 06/13/05 Page 1 of 1
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION

TERRY DEESE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 1:06cv643-MHT

) 

CHAMPION ENTERPRISES, )

INC., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion to extend (doc. no. 23)

is granted.

DONE, this the 5th day of December, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 24 Filed 12/05/2006 Page 1 of 1
§ 62.206 Access to program documents and activities. ( a ) The applicant shall make its products, records, and documentation available and easily accessible for assessment, with respect to the requested service. Auditors and other USDA officials responsible for maintaining uniformity and accuracy of service authorized under this part shall have access to all areas of facilities covered by approved applications for service under the regulations, during normal business hours or during periods of production, for the purpose of evaluating products or processes. This includes products in facilities which have been or are to be examined for program conformance or which bear any USDA official marks of conformance. This further includes any facilities or operations that are part of an approved program.
( b ) Documentation and records relating to an applicant's program must be retained as prescribed under each service program authorized under this part.
# 52.247-54 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**52.247 [Reserved]