alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

§ 800.73 Computation and payment of service fees; general fee information. ( a ) *Computing hourly rates.* The applicable hourly rate will be assessed in quarter hour increments for: ( 1 ) Travel from the FGIS field office or assigned duty station to the service point and return;
( 2 ) The performance of the requested service, less mealtime.
( b ) *Application of fees when service is delayed or dismissed by the applicant.* The applicable hourly rate will be assessed for the entire period of scheduled service when: ( 1 ) Service has been requested at a specified location;
( 2 ) A service representative is on duty and ready to provide service but is unable to do so because of a delay not caused by the Service; and
( 3 ) FGIS officials determine that the service representative cannot be utilized to provide service elsewhere without cost to the Service.
( c ) *Application of fees when an application for service is withdrawn or dismissed.* The applicable hourly rate will be assessed to the applicant for the entire period of scheduled service if the request is withdrawn or dismissed after the service representative departs for the service point, or if the service request is not canceled by 2 p.m., local time, the business day preceding the date of scheduled service. However, the applicable hourly rate will not be assessed to the applicant if FGIS officials determine that the service representative can be utilized elsewhere or released without cost to the Service.
( d ) *To whom fees are assessed.* Fees for inspection, weighing, and related services performed by service representatives, including additional fees as provided in §§ 800.72(a) and 800.74, shall be assessed to and paid by the applicant for the service.
( e ) *Advance payment.* As necessary, the Administrator may require that fees shall be paid in advance of the performance of the requested service. Any fees paid in excess of the amount due shall be used to offset future billings, unless a request for a refund is made by the applicant.
( f ) *Form of payment.* Bills for fees assessed under the regulations in this part for official services performed by FGIS shall be paid by check, draft, or money order, payable to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[61 FR 43305, Aug. 22, 1996, as amended at 69 FR 26490, May 13, 2004; 89 FR 48265, June 6, 2024]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

 

RUTH WILLIAMS, * 

 * 

 Plaintiffs, * 

 * 

v. * Civil Action No.: 1:06cv637-MHT 

 * 

MERCK & CO., INC., * 

 * 

 Defendant. * 

ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT

 COMES NOW, Defendant Merck & Co., Inc. (“Merck”), by and through its 

undersigned attorneys, and hereby answers the Amended Complaint (“Complaint”) as 

follows: 

 Defendant adopts and incorporates herein as if set out in full its Answer to 

Complaint previously filed. 

 

s/Richard B. Garrett

Richard B. Garrett 

 Bar Number: (ASB-0782-A29R) 

Mike Brock 

Bar Number: (ASB-5280-B61R) 

F. Chadwick Morriss 

Bar Number: (ASB-8504-S75F) 

RUSHTON, STAKELY, JOHNSTON 

& GARRETT, P.A. 

Post Office box 270 

Montgomery, Alabama 36101-0270 

Telephone: 334/206-3100 

Fax: 334/263-4157 

 E-mail: rbg@rsjg.com

 rcb@rsjg.com

 fcm@rsjg.com 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

Case 1:06-cv-00637-MHT-SRW Document 9-2 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that on August 22, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with 

the Clerk of the court using CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to 

the following: Tom Dutton and Elizabeth French. 

 s/Richard B.Garrett 

 OF COUNSEL 

 

Case 1:06-cv-00637-MHT-SRW Document 9-2 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 2 of 2
# 5236.601 Policy.

   (1) NAVFACENGCOM is responsible for any required Congressional notification.

**Parent topic:**Subpart 5236.6 - ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SERVICES
52.247-35 F.o.b. Destination, Within

Consignee’s Premises.

As prescribed in 47.303-7(c), insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts when the

delivery term is f.o.b. destination, within consignee’s premises:

F.o.b. Destination, Within Consignee’s Premises (Apr 1984)

(a) The term "f.o.b. destination, within consignee’s premises," as used in this clause, means free of

expense to the Government delivered and laid down within the doors of the consignee’s premises,

including delivery to specific rooms within a building if so specified.

(b) The Contractor shall-

(1)

(i) Pack and mark the shipment to comply with contract specifications; or

(ii) In the absence of specifications, prepare the shipment in conformance with carrier requirements;

(2) Prepare and distribute commercial bills of lading;

(3) Deliver the shipment in good order and condition to the point of delivery specified in the

contract;

(4) Be responsible for any loss of and/or damage to the goods occurring before receipt of the

shipment by the consignee at the delivery point specified in the contract;

(5) Furnish a delivery schedule and designate the mode of delivering carrier; and

(6) Pay and bear all charges to the specified point of delivery.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.247 [Reserved]
§ 900.103 Application for mediation. An application for mediation by a cooperative, shall be in writing and shall include the following information: ( a ) Names in full of the parties to the dispute and their addresses;
( b ) Description of the cooperative organization and business, including copies of the articles of incorporation or association, by-laws, and membership contract; information regarding the number of shares of outstanding stock and the approximate portion owned by active producers; a statement of the function performed in connection with the collective processing, preparing, handling, or marketing of milk or its products; and data relative to the distribution of membership by States, the distribution by States of plant facilities for collecting, processing, or disposing of milk or its products, and the business operations for the year last past, including the total quantity of milk and its products handled by the applicant and the proportion of that quantity that was sold in States other than the States of production;
( c ) Suggested time and place for meeting between parties and mediator.
5652.242-9002 Accounting for Common Access Cards (CACs) for Contractor Personnel Departing HQ USSOCOM (2014) Section I    *(Added February 2014)*       As prescribed in 5642-490 insert a clause substantially the same as the following in solicitations and contracts and or task orders:       (a) In the event a contractor employee separates without advance notice (either quits or is terminated), the contractor shall immediately notify the Trusted Agent (TA) who will ensure CAC permissions are revoked the same day. In various instances a contractor employee may not be on task (working) due to furloughs, suspensions pending the outcome of an investigation, or the contract reaches the end of the period of performance (POP) and renewal is anticipated but not yet complete. During these occurrences, the TA or a representative from the contractor (TA’s choice) will collect and retain the CACs of the affected contractor personnel residing in the local area however; CAC permissions will not be revoked in the Trusted Associate Sponsorship System (TASS). Collecting CACs however, may not be feasible for contractor personnel located in remote locations. When contractor personnel return to work under the contract, they will retrieve their CAC from the responsible party who collected it.       (b) The contractor shall include a monthly report listing contractor employees who departed during the previous month and the date their CACs were turned in using the format listed below.       Employee Name                   Contract Number                   TO Number                   Company Name                   HQ USSCOM Office Symbol                   TA Name                   Termination Date                   Date CAC returned to RAPIDS Site                   Remarks       HQ, United States Special Operations Command       Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L-K)       SOFARS 5652       February 2007 **Parent topic:** Subpart 5652.2 - [RESERVED]
#### § 900.601 OMB control numbers assigned pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act.

(a) *Purpose.* This section collects and displays the control numbers assigned to information collection requirements by the Office of Management and Budget contained in 7 CFR parts 905 through 998 under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

(b) *Display.*

| 7 CFR part, where identified and described | Current OMB control No. |
| --- | --- |
| 905, Florida Citrus | 0581-0189 |
| 906, Texas Citrus | 0581-0189 |
| 915, Florida Avocados | 0581-0189 |
| 920, California Kiwifruit | 0581-0189 |
| 922, Washington Apricots | 0581-0189 |
| 923, Washington Sweet Cherries | 0581-0189 |
| 925, California Desert Grapes | 0581-0189 |
| 927, Oregon & Washington Pears | 0581-0189 |
| 929, Cranberries | 0581-0189 |
| 930, Tart Cherries | 0581-0177 |
| 932, California Olives | 0581-0178 |
| 945, Idaho-Eastern Oregon Potatoes | 0581-0178 |
| 948, Colorado Potatoes | 0581-0178 |
| 955, Vidalia Onions | 0581-0178 |
| 956, Walla Walla Onions | 0581-0178 |
| 958, Idaho-Eastern Oregon Onions | 0581-0178 |
| 959, South Texas Onions | 0581-0178 |
| 966, Florida Tomatoes | 0581-0178 |
| 981, California Almonds | 0581-0178 |
| 981, California Almond Salmonella | 0581-0242 |
| 982, Oregon & Washington Hazelnuts | 0581-0178 |
| 983, Pistachios | 0581-0215 |
| 984, California Walnuts | 0581-0178 |
| 985, Far West Spearmint Oil | 0581-0178 |
| 986, Pecans | 0581-0291 |
| 987, California Dates | 0581-0178 |
| 989, California Raisins | 0581-0178 |
| 990, Domestic Hemp | 0581-0318 |
| 993, California Dried Prunes | 0581-0178 |

Table 1 to Paragraph (b)

[63 FR 10492, Mar. 4, 1998, as amended at 88 FR 82231, Nov. 24, 2023]
PART 39 — ACQUISITION OF INFORMATION

TECHNOLOGY

 SUBPART 39.1 – GENERAL

 39.101 Policy.

 SUBPART 39.2 —INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY

 39.201 Scope of subpart.

 SUBPART 239.74 —TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES

 239.7401 Definitions.

 239.7407 Type of contract.

SUBPART 39.1 – GENERAL

39.101 Policy.

(S-90) Unless there is an associated service being offered with a software subscription or

softwaremaintenance agreement, and that associated service is billed separately, the acquisition of

software subscriptions or software maintenance agreements will be acquired as a product. Further,

IT Value Added Reseller (ITVAR) excepted acquisitions with the NAICS code 541519 will be acquired

as a product.

SUBPART 39.2 —INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION

TECHNOLOGY

39.201 Scope of subpart.

(S-90) Section 508 Compliance. The DoD Section 508 policies are located at

http://dodcio.defense.gov/DoDSection508.aspx .

SUBPART 239.74 —TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES
239.7401 Definitions.

(S-90) Leasing/provisioning of telecommunications circuits (commoditized bandwidth) is covered

under the FAR 2.101 Definitions, Commercial item definition, paragraph (1) in that it is a utility

customarily used by the general public or by non-governmental entities for purposes other than

governmental purposes, and has been sold, leased, or licensed to the general public; or, has been

offered for sale, lease, or license to the general public. Thus, the FAR definition of a commercially

available off-the-shelf (COTS) item would also cover leasing/provisioning of telecommunications

circuits (commoditized bandwidth).

(S-91) Unless there is an associated service offered with the telecommunications and that associated

service is billed separately, the leasing/provisioning of the telecommunications circuit (commoditized

bandwidth) is not a "service contract." IAW FAR 22.001, a "service contract means any Government

contract, or subcontract thereunder, the principal purpose of which is to furnish services in the

United States through the use of service employees."

239.7407 Type of contract.

(S-90) When acquiring telecommunications services using the Inquiry/Quote/Order (IQO) process or

Communication Service Authorizations (CSAs), refer to the IQO Acquisition Deskbook located at

https://www.ditco.disa.mil/hq/deskbooks.asp .

(S-91) A CSA change order or discontinue modification may be issued unilaterally if an equitable

adjustment in contract/order price or delivery terms has been agreed upon and documented in

advance (i.e., completion notice/report, bilateral modification to IDIQ contract). If an equitable

adjustment in contract/order price or delivery terms has been agreed upon and documented in

advance, only the unilateral CSA change order or discontinue modification is required. The

contractor shall acknowledge the change order or discontinue modification as required by the

contract.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

STARLEIGH Y. JUDKINS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06CV625-SRW

) (WO)

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, )

Commissioner of Social Security, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

Plaintiff brought the present action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial

review of a decision by the Commissioner of Social Security denying her benefits under the

Social Security Act. On February 18, 2010, on the Commissioner’s motion, this court

reversed the decision and remanded the case for further proceedings pursuant to sentence

four of § 405(g). Plaintiff has filed an application for an award of attorneys fees under the

Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A). Plaintiff’s application,

as amended, seeks fees in the total amount of $3,937.46. The Commissioner does not contest

the petition and requests that this court award fees in the amount sought by plaintiff’s

counsel. Upon an independent review of the record, the court concludes that the position

of the Commissioner in this litigation was not substantially justified, and further that the

amount of fees sought by plaintiff’s counsel is reasonable.

For the foregoing reasons, it is 

ORDERED that the plaintiff’s motion for attorney fees (Doc. # 23) is GRANTED, and

Case 2:06-cv-00625-SRW Document 26 Filed 05/13/10 Page 1 of 2
plaintiff is awarded EAJA fees in the total amount of $3,937.46, payable to plaintiff’s

counsel: Clark, James, Hanlin, & Hunt, LLC.”1

Done, this 13th day of May, 2010.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1

 See Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees, attached to Doc. # 23.

2

Case 2:06-cv-00625-SRW Document 26 Filed 05/13/10 Page 2 of 2
ltir Methods

· December 14 ,2016 US Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 Washington, DC 20590 Submitted via www.requlations.gov Dear Sir orMadam

: DEFENDERS
OFTOMORROW

On March 29, 2013 the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) granted Exemption No. 10741 on Regulatory Docket No. FAA-201 0-0920 to Air Methods Corporation (AMC). This exemption from §§ 47.49 and 91

.203(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) allows AMC to temporarily operate its U.S.-registered aircraft in domestic air operations without the registration orairworthiness certificates onboard the aircraft

,subject to certain conditions stated therein. Since the first Exemption No
.1 07 41 was granted

it has been extended everytwo years

.The latest extension, Exemption No
.10741A will expire by its ownterms on April30, 2015

. There have been no changes to the conditions and circumstances

to which Exemption No 10741 was originally granted

.Experience with Exemption No 10741 demonstrates that the public interest is served and alevel of safety equivalent
to regulation
is maintained when Air Methods aircraft are temporarily allowed to operate without
a registration orairworthiness certificate onboard. Exemption No. 10741 remains vital to the public interest, therefore Air Methods petitions the Administrator

to extend this exemption for anadditional two-year term, orfor such longer term asthe Administrator maydeem appropriate. If youhave any questions concerning this request for anextension please contact meat (303)792-7442
oremail at kmoore@airmethods

.com

. Respectfully, Kerensa Moore 135 Maintenance Compliance Specialist Aviation Services Air Methods Corporation 7211 S. PEORIA

I ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112

I 303.792.7400

I AIRMETHODS.COM
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]

United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 01-2212

SANDRA C. DONATO,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

SHEILAH F. MCCARTHY,

Defendant, Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

[Hon. Steven J. McAuliffe, U.S. District Judge]

Before

 Lynch, Circuit Judge,

Campbell and Stahl, Senior Circuit Judges.

Sandra C. Donato on brief pro se.

R. Matthew Cairns and Ransmeier & Spellman on brief for

appellee.

March 5, 2002
Per Curiam. Plaintiff Sandra C. Donato appeals a

judgment of the district court granting summary judgment in favor

of defendant-appellee Sheilah F. McCarthy. We have reviewed the

parties' briefs and the record below. Upon our review, we conclude

that summary judgment was correctly granted. We affirm the

district court judgment, essentially for the reasons stated in the

district court's order dated July 17, 2001.

Appellee McCarthy did not submit a separately filed

motion pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 38. Her request, recited in the

final paragraph in her brief, that we direct Donato to pay

attorney's fees and costs for filing a frivolous appeal is denied.

"A party may not invoke Rule 38 by a reference in his brief." In

re I Don't Trust, 143 F.3d 1, 4 (1st Cir. 1998).

Affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

EASTERN DIVISION

*

LUMBERMAN’S UNDERWRITING *

ALLIANCE, as Subrogee of *

TRANSPORT LEASING/CONTRACT, *

INC.; HANSEN & ADKINS AUTO *

TRANSPORT, *

*

Plaintiff, *

* 3:06-CV-645-MEF

vs. *

*

EMORY LEE YOUNG, et al. * Formerly Russell County Circuit

* Court Case No.: CV-06-224

Defendant. *

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

COMES NOW Plaintiff, Lumberman’s Underwriting Alliance, as Subrogee of Transport

Leasing/Contract, Inc.; Hansen & Adkins Auto Transport (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and respectfully

moves this Court to dismiss with prejudice the pending case for the following reason: 

1) Plaintiff and Defendants have settled this matter to the satisfaction of each party.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court

dismiss this action with prejudice. 

 /s/ Ryan Wesley Shaw 

MICHEAL S. JACKSON [ASB-8173-078M]

RYAN WESLEY SHAW [ASB-2475-Y83S]

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Case 3:06-cv-00645-MEF-TFM Document 28 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 1 of 2
OF COUNSEL:

BEERS, ANDERSON, JACKSON,

 PATTY & FAWAL, P.C.

250 Commerce Street, Suite 100

P.O. Box 1988

Montgomery, AL 36102

(334) 834-5311 Phone

(334) 834-5362 Facsimile

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 3, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk

of Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following:

Joshua J. Jackson, Esq. Patrick Norris, Esq.

SAMFORD & DENSON, LLP MCDANIEL, BAINS & NORRIS, P.C.

P.O. Box 2345 Two Metroplex Drive

Opelika, Alabama 36803-2345 Suite 504

Birmingham, Alabama 35209-6812

 /s/ Ryan Wesley Shaw 

OF COUNSEL

Case 3:06-cv-00645-MEF-TFM Document 28 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 35
                                   ----------


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWALT, INC.
                        ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2006-30T1
              MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-30T1


      The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant to Section
3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the Agreement
has been made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
throughout such calendar year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                      Dated: March 14, 2007
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2861 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2861

              To suspend temporarily the duty on Chloral.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 19, 2006

   Mr. Burr introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
              To suspend temporarily the duty on Chloral.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CHLORAL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.10.31      Trichloroacetaldeh  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         yde (CAS No. 75-                                                   31/2009
                         87-6) (provided
                         for in subheading
                         2913.00.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CR. NO. 2:06cr169-WKW

)

DARNELL MONTREZE BROWN )

ORDER

Upon consideration of defendant attorney's motion to withdraw (Doc. # 204), filed

April 19, 2007, and for good cause, it is

ORDERED that the motion be and hereby is set for hearing on April 26, 2007 at 4:00

p.m. in courtroom 5-B, Frank M. Johnson, Jr. United States Courthouse Complex, One

Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama. 

If the defendant is in custody, the United States Marshal or the person having custody

of the defendant shall produce the defendant for this proceeding. 

DONE, this 25th day of April, 2007.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 213 Filed 04/25/2007 Page 1 of 1
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 19

- 00148

- CR

L ANE A NTHONY J ORDAN

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from

County Criminal Court No. 1

of Tarrant County ( 1571326 )

September 24, 2020

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Gabriel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no reve rsible error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment

of the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

Justice Lee Gabriel
#### § 51.1411 Well developed.

*Well developed* means that the kernel is full-meated throughout its width and length.