alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Subpart 205.2 - SYNOPSES OF PROPOSED CONTRACT ACTIONS    **Parent topic:** Part 205 - PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONS205.203 Publicizing and response time.       (b)  Allow at least 45 days response time when requested by a qualifying or designated country source (as these terms are used in Part 225) and the request is consistent with the Government's requirement.          (S-70)  When using competitive procedures, if a solicitation allowed fewer than 30 days for receipt of offers and resulted in only one offer, the contracting officer shall resolicit, allowing an additional period of at least 30 days for receipt of offers, except as provided in                 215.371-4              and                 215.371-5             .205.205 Special situations.       See PGI 205.205 for instructions on the solicitation notice regarding timely definitization of equitable adjustments for change orders under construction contracts.    205.205-70 Notification of bundling of DoD contracts.       (a) When a proposed acquisition is funded entirely using DoD funds and potentially involves bundling, the contracting officer shall, at least 30 days prior to the release of a solicitation or 30 days prior to placing an order without a solicitation, publish in the Governmentwide point of entry (https://www.sam.gov) a notification of the intent to bundle the requirement. In addition, if the agency has determined that measurably substantial benefits are expected to be derived as a result of bundling, the notification shall include a brief description of those benefits (see FAR 7.107).          (b)  This requirement is in addition to the notification requirements at FAR 10.001(c)(2)(i) and (ii).205.205-71 Only one responsible source.       Follow the procedures at PGI                 206.302-1             (d) prior to soliciting a proposal without providing for full and open competition under the authority at FAR 6.302-1.205.207 Preparation and transmittal of synopses.       (a)(i)  For numbering synopsis notices, follow the procedures at PGI                 205.207             (a)(i).          (d)  For special notices for small business events, follow the procedures at PGI                 205.207             (d).
5132.7101 Policy and procedures.

(b)(4) Subject to DFARS 232.7101(b) and the procedures at the DFARS PGI 232.7101(b), the

contracting officer shall ensure the senior contracting official (SCO) endorses the notification

memorandum sent to the Director, Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy (DPAP). The SCO

may not delegate this endorsement to a lower level. In addition to the assessment the contractor

provides, the contracting officer shall obtain from the appropriate requiring activity any other

information necessary to prepare the notification. The contract file will clearly show all reviews and

coordination for the action at the SCO and lower levels, to include legal counsel review. When the

contracting officer sends the notification memorandum to the Director, DPAP, the contracting officer

shall provide a copy of this memorandum to the address at 5101.290(b)(2)(ii)(A).

(c) When the contracting officer receives a response from DPAP, the contracting officer shall send a

copy of the response to the address at 5101.290(b)(2)(ii)(A).

Parent topic: Subpart 5132.71 - Levies on Contract Payments
52.216-18 Ordering.

As prescribed in 16.506(a), insert the following clause:

Ordering (Aug 2020)

(a) Any supplies and services to be furnished under this contract shall be ordered by issuance of

delivery orders or task orders by the individuals or activities designated in the Schedule. Such

orders may be issued from __________ through ____________ [insert dates].

(b) All delivery orders or task orders are subject to the terms and conditions of this contract. In the

event of conflict between a delivery order or task order and this contract, the contract shall control.

(c) A delivery order or task order is considered "issued" when—

(1) If sent by mail (includes transmittal by U.S. mail or private delivery service), the Government

deposits the order in the mail;

(2) If sent by fax, the Government transmits the order to the Contractor's fax number; or

(3) If sent electronically, the Government either—

(i) Posts a copy of the delivery order or task order to a Government document access system, and

notice is sent to the Contractor; or

(ii) Distributes the delivery order or task order via email to the Contractor's email address.

(d) Orders may be issued by methods other than those enumerated in this clause only if authorized

in the contract.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.216 [Reserved]
2012 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

7-10-2012

Michael Alexander Nelson v. Atty Gen USA

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 11-1654

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2012

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2012 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Michael Alexander Nelson v. Atty Gen USA" (2012). 2012 Decisions. Paper 623.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2012/623
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 

June 13, 2012

No. 11-1654

MICHAEL ALEXANDER NELSON, 

Petitioner

v.

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED 

STATES, Respondent

(Agency No. A044-843-940)

Present: VANASKIE, BARRY and CUDAHY, Circuit Judges

Motion by Respondent to Publish the Opinion Dated 05/22/2012.

Respectfully, 

Clerk/pdb for smw

_________________________________ORDER________________________________ 

The foregoing motion is GRANTED

By the Court,

/s/Maryanne Trump Barry

Circuit Judge

Dated: July 10, 2012

Smw/cc: Jeffrey L. Menkin, Esq.

Kristen Sawicki, Esq.

Richard H. Frankel, Esq.

Jonathan O'Boyle, Esq.
# L_2021396EN.01006401.xml

| 10.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 396/64 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 396/64

---

COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING DECISION (CFSP) 2021/1942

of 9 November 2021

implementing Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 31(2) thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 of 31 July 2015 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya, and repealing Decision 2011/137/CFSP (1), and in particular Article 12(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 31 July 2015, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 31 July 2015, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya.

| (2) | On the basis of a review by the Council, the entry for one listed person should be deleted. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On the basis of a review by the Council, the entry for one listed person should be deleted.

| (3) | Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Annexes II and IV to Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 are amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 9 November 2021.

For the Council

The President

A. ŠIRCELJ

---

(1)  
  OJ L 206, 1.8.2015, p. 34.

1

---

ANNEX

Annexes II and IV to Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 are amended as follows:

| (1) | in Annex II (List of persons and entities referred to in Article 8(2)), Part A (Persons), entry 7 (concerning AL-MAHMOUDI, Baghdadi) is deleted; |
| --- | --- |

(1)

in Annex II (List of persons and entities referred to in Article 8(2)), Part A (Persons), entry 7 (concerning AL-MAHMOUDI, Baghdadi) is deleted;

| (2) | in Annex IV (List of persons and entities referred to in Article 9(2)), Part A (Persons), entry 7 (concerning AL-MAHMOUDI, Baghdadi) is deleted. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

in Annex IV (List of persons and entities referred to in Article 9(2)), Part A (Persons), entry 7 (concerning AL-MAHMOUDI, Baghdadi) is deleted.

---
# 5103.1004 Contract clauses.

(a)  Insert the clause at FAR 52.203-13, Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct, in full text.

**Parent topic:**Subpart 5103.10 - Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct
#### § 51.2086 Well dried.

*Well dried* means that the kernel is firm and brittle, not pliable or leathery.
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 1 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 2 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 3 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 4 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 5 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 6 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 7 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 8 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 9 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 10 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 11 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 12 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 13 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 14 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 15 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 16 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 17 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 18 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 19 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 20 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 21 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 22 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 23 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 24 of 25
Case 2:06-cv-00626-WHA-DRB Document 1 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 25 of 25
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Peter Gigliotti, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County, rendered May 3, 1978, upon a verdict convicting defendant of two counts of the crime of assault in the first degree. On November 24, 1977, Giacomo Cesare filed a felony complaint accusing the defendant of the crime of assault in the first degree, asserting that defendant had cut him with an "unknown sharp instrument.” A warrant was thereafter issued and on the next day defendant was arrested and was given his *Miranda*warnings. He was then taken to the police station for booking, at which time he was told to empty his pockets on the desk. One of the arresting officers then asked him what he had used in the assault. Defendant replied, "This”, and pushed a pocketknife, which he had removed from his pocket, across the desk. Defendant was thereafter arraigned and was subsequently indicted and charged with two counts of assault in the first degree. A suppression hearing was thereafter held at which defendant sought to suppress the knife and his oral statement. The court denied the motion to suppress, finding that defendant was given *Miranda*warnings, understood them, and had voluntarily waived his rights. The court further found that the knife was obtained in the course of a valid inventory search. After a trial, the jury found defendant guilty on both counts of assault as charged. Defendant contends that the criminal action having been commenced by the filing of a felony complaint prior to his arrest, he could not waive the right to counsel out of the presence of counsel and, therefore, his oral statement should have been suppressed as a matter of law. This precise question was presented to the Court of Appeals in *People v Samuels*(49 NY2d 218), and it was therein determined that (p 223) once a felony complaint has been filed " 'there may be no waiver of the right to counsel unless an attorney is present’ ”. "Once a matter is the subject of a legal controversy any discussions relating thereto should be conducted by counsel: at that point the parties are in no position to safeguard their rights” *(People v Settles,*46 NY2d 154, 164). The oral statement made by defendant should, therefore, have been suppressed. While the trial court did not err in refusing to suppress the knife *(People v Perel,*34 NY2d 462), admissibility of the knife into evidence upon a new trial, which must be ordered, will necessarily have to rest upon a foundation, other than defendant’s oral statement. Judgment reversed, on the law, and a new trial ordered. Sweeney, J. P., Staley, Jr., Main, Mikoll and Casey, JJ., concur.
STEAM ELECTRIC

C B I R E P L AC E M E NT P A G E

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 20 09

- 0819

DCN:

________________________________________

T H E FO LL OW ING H AS BEE N R E M O V E D BE CAUSE IT
C O N T AINS C O N F ID E N T IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA T I O N (C B I) P E R 4 0 C F R P ART 2
, SU B P ART B

. SE04360A172
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 17

- 00168

- CR

Robert Benavides v. The State Of Texas
On Appeal from the 319th District Court of Nueces County , Texas Trial Cause No. 16

- CR

- 0707

- G

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cau se on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. January 25, 2018
§ 63.109 Procedure. ( a ) At a Board meeting, it will be considered a quorum when a simple majority of the voting representatives are present.
( b ) A decision of the Board shall be made by a majority of the voting members of the board.
( c ) The Board shall meet not less than once each fiscal year at the call of the chairperson or at the request of the executive director.
( d ) The location of the meeting shall be established by the Board.
( e ) A chairperson shall be selected from among the voting members of the Board and all serve a term of office of two years.
( f ) All Board members and the Secretary will be notified at least 30 days in advance of all Board meetings, unless an emergency meeting is declared.
( g ) In lieu of voting at a properly convened meeting and, when in the opinion of the chairperson of the Board such action is necessary, the Board may take action if supported by a simple majority of the Board representatives by mail, telephone, electronic mail, facsimile, or any other means of communication. In that event, all representatives must be notified and provided the opportunity to vote. Any action so taken shall have the same force and effect as though such action had been taken at a properly convened meeting of the Board. All telephone votes shall be confirmed promptly in writing. All votes shall be recorded in Board minutes.
( h ) There shall be no voting by proxy.
( i ) The organization of the Board and the procedures for conducting meetings of the Board shall be in accordance with its bylaws, which shall be established by the Board and approved by the Secretary.
# L_2014008EN.01001601.xml

| 11.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 8/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 8/16

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 18/2014

of 10 January 2014

entering a name in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed [Žemaitiškas kastinys (TSG)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Lithuania’s application to register the name ‘Žemaitiškas kastinys’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Lithuania’s application to register the name ‘Žemaitiškas kastinys’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Žemaitiškas kastinys’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Žemaitiškas kastinys’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 January 2014.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 237, 15.8.2013, p. 40.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.4.   Other products of animal origin (eggs, honey, various dairy products except butter, etc.)

LITHUANIA

Žemaitiškas kastinys (TSG)

---
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 7, 2010 / Presidential Documents 75855 

Presidential Determination No. 2011–04 of October 25, 2010 

Presidential Determination With Respect To Section 404(c) of 

the Child Soldiers Prevention Act of 2008 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States of America, pursuant to section 404(c) of the 

Child Soldiers Prevention Act of 2008 (CSPA), title IV of the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008 (Public 

Law 110 457), I hereby determine that it is in the national interest of 

the United States to waive the application to Chad, the Democratic Republic 

of the Congo, Sudan, and Yemen of the prohibition in section 404(a) of 

the CSPA. 

You are authorized and directed to submit this determination to the Congress, 

along with the accompanying memorandum of justification, and to publish 

it in the Federal Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, October 25, 2010 

Billing code 4710–10–P 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PRESDOCSOB#1.EPS</GPH>
75856 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 7, 2010 / Presidential Documents 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PRESDOCSED07DE10.039</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 7, 2010 / Presidential Documents 75857 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PRESDOCSED07DE10.040</GPH>
75858 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 7, 2010 / Presidential Documents 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PRESDOCSED07DE10.041</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 7, 2010 / Presidential Documents 75859 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PRESDOCSED07DE10.042</GPH>
75860 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 7, 2010 / Presidential Documents 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PRESDOCSED07DE10.043</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 7, 2010 / Presidential Documents 75861 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PRESDOCSED07DE10.044</GPH>
75862 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 7, 2010 / Presidential Documents 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PRESDOCSED07DE10.045</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 7, 2010 / Presidential Documents 75863 

[FR Doc. 2010–30828 

Filed 12–6–10; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–C 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PRESDOCSED07DE10.046</GPH>
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

WAYNE BLACK, #137192, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO.: 1:03-CV-734-MEF

 )

LAMAR GLOVER, et. al., )

 )

Defendants. )

FINAL JUDGMENT

This action came to jury trial before this Court. The issues have been tried or heard

and a decision has been rendered on a motion for judgment as a matter of law pursuant to

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(a) filed by the Defendants at the close of the Plaintiff’s

case. Consistent with this Court’s oral order granting this motion, it is hereby ORDERED

and ADJUDGED as follows:

(1) With respect to all claims in this action, judgment is ENTERED in favor of

Defendants Lamar Glover and Walter Bowers and against Wayne Black, with Plaintiff taking

nothing by his claims. 

(2) Costs are TAXED in favor of Defendants Lamar Glover and Walter Bowers and

against Plaintiff Wayne Black for which execution may issue. 

The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document as a Final Judgment

pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and to close this file.

DONE this the 3 day of October, 2006. 

rd

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-00734-MEF-SRW Document 45 Filed 10/03/2006 Page 1 of 1