alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AU GUST 20, 2015

NO. 03

- 13

- 00704

- CV

Karen Kuester, Appellant

v.

Ivor Green, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 200TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GO ODWIN, AND FIEL D

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment render ed by the tr i a l court on June 13, 2013. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, th e C ourt holds that there was no reversible error

in the trial court’s judgment . Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s judgment

. A ppellant

shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
# 252.247-7001 Reserved.

**Parent topic:**252.247 RESERVED
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

I, Steven A. Schumm, the Chief Administrative Officer of Enstar Income Program II-2, L.P. (the "Partnership") in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, the Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission:

- fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/ Steven A. SchummSteven A. SchummChief Administrative OfficerNovember 13, 2002
#### § 621.31 Who may request assistance.

Any organization, group, or State or local government may request assistance.
47.105 Transportation assistance.

(a) Civilian Government activities that do not have transportation officers, or otherwise need

assistance on transportation matters, shall obtain assistance from-

(1) The GSA Regional Federal Supply Service Bureau that provides support to the activity or

(2) The transportation element of the contract administration office designated in the contract.

(b) Military installations shall obtain transportation assistance from the transportation office of the

contracting activity, unless another military activity has been designated as responsible for

furnishing assistance, guidance, or data. Military transportation offices shall request needed

additional aid from the Military Surface Deployment and Distribution Command (SDDC).

Parent topic: Subpart 47.1 - General
52.236-12 Cleaning Up.       As prescribed in 36.512, insert the following clause:          Cleaning Up (Apr 1984)          The Contractor shall at all times keep the work area, including storage areas, free from accumulations of waste materials. Before completing the work, the Contractor shall remove from the work and premises any rubbish, tools, scaffolding, equipment, and materials that are not the property of the Government. Upon completing the work, the Contractor shall leave the work area in a clean, neat, and orderly condition satisfactory to the Contracting Officer.          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.236 [Reserved]
MEMORANDUM

DATE: 08/22/2014

FROM: Laura Farris/EPA Region 8

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

SUBJECT: State Air Director’s Meeting - August 19, 2014 

SUMMARY: 

Carl Daly and Laura Farris, EPA Region 8, met with the EPA Region 8 State Air Directors on Tuesday, 

August 19, 2014, to discuss various aspects of the proposed rule under section 111(d) of the Clean Air 

Act. The rule was proposed on June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES:

EPA Region 8

Carl Daly

Laura Farris

Dee Rothery

Monica Morales

Abby Fulton

External Participants

Brian Gustafson, SD DEQ

Will Allison, CO CDPHE

Bryce Bird, UT DEQ

Dave Klemp, MT DEQ

Steve Dietrich, WY DEQ

Terry O’Clair, ND DEQ
Exhibit
99.4




CONSENT
OF AUTHOR
  
  TO:
              Ur-Energy
    Inc.British Columbia
      Securities CommissionAlberta Securities
      CommissionSaskatchewan
      Securities CommissionManitoba Securities
      CommissionOntario Securities
      CommissionUnited States
      Securities and Exchange CommissionAND TO:
              Toronto Stock
      ExchangeNYSE
  AmexRE:
              Ur-Energy Inc.
      (“Ur-Energy”) - Consent under National Instrument
  43-101
  Reference
is made to the technical report (the “Technical Report”) entitled “NI 43-101 Preliminary Assessment for
the Lost Creek Project, Sweetwater County, Wyoming,”(April 2008) which
the undersigned has prepared for Ur-Energy.
 
 I have
reviewed and approved the summary of and extract from the Technical Report
prepared to be filed with the Annual Report on Form 20-F (Annual Information
Form) of Ur-Energy (fiscal year ended December 31, 2008) and confirm that the
summary and extract fairly and accurately represents the information in the
Technical Report.  I hereby consent to the written disclosure of my
name, and reference to and incorporation by reference of, the Technical Report
in the public filing of the Annual Report on Form 20-F (Annual Information Form)
of Ur-Energy with the regulatory authorities referred to above.  I
further consent to the incorporation by reference into Registration Statement
No. 333-153098 on Form S-8 of the Technical Report.
 
 I certify
that I have reviewed the Annual Report on Form 20-F (Annual Information Form)
being filed and I do not have any reason to believe that there are any
misrepresentations in the information contained therein that are derived from
the Technical Report or that are within my knowledge as a result of the services
performed by me in connection with the Technical Report.
  
 Dated:  March
24, 2009
 
 
 
 /s/ John I.
Kyle
 John
I. Kyle, P.E., Vice President
 Lyntek
Incorporated
#### In re TITLE GUARANTY & TRUST CO. et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 12, 1906.)

In the matter of the judicial settlement of the account of proceedings of the Title Guaranty & Trust Company and others, as executors, etc.

No opinion. Motion to resettle order granted.
§ 769.160 Letter of conditions. ( a ) If the Agency approves a loan application, the Agency will provide the intermediary with a letter of conditions listing all requirements for the loan.
( b ) Immediately after reviewing the conditions and requirements in the letter of conditions, the intermediary should complete, sign, and return the form provided by the Agency indicating the intermediary's intent to meet the conditions. ( 1 ) If certain conditions cannot be met, the intermediary may propose alternative conditions to the Agency.
( 2 ) The Agency loan approval official must concur with any changes made to the initially issued or proposed letter of conditions prior to loan approval.
( c ) The loan request will be considered withdrawn if the intermediary does not respond within 15 calendar days from the date the letter of conditions was sent.
NTSB/HAB-02/09 

E PLURIBUS UNUM

NATIONAL TRA S PORTAT OI N

BOARD

SAFE T Y

N

National Transportation Safety Board 

Washington, D.C. 20594 

Highway Accident Brief

Accident No.: HWY-98-SH-006 

Accident Type: Sideswipe collision with school bus 

Location: Lancaster, Ohio 

Date and Time: November 3, 1997; 6:50 a.m. 

Vehicle 1 (V1): 1992 Hino straight truck hauling produce 

Vehicle 2 (V2): 1986 Bluebird school bus 

Injuries: 2 serious, 7 minor injuries 

Accident Description 

The truckdriver entered an intersection on a red traffic signal and struck the school 

bus on its left side. Both vehicles rotated 90 degrees and came to rest within the 

intersection of Ety Road and North Memorial Drive. The roadway was damp at the time 

of the accident. (See figure 1.) One of the 10 school bus occupants sustained serious 

injuries, 7 sustained minor injures, and 2 were uninjured. The truckdriver sustained 

serious injuries. Postaccident testing revealed the presence of marijuana in the 

truckdriver’s system. 

State/Federal Oversight 

Ohio has adopted the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations with some variances; 

none of the variances were pertinent to the carrier or driver at the time of the accident. 

Following the accident, the Public Utility Commission of Ohio conducted a compliance 

review of the carrier and found several violations regarding preemployment and random 

controlled-substance testing, employee checks, and hours of service. 
NTSB/HAB-02/09 

2 

V1

at impact

V2

at impact

V1 & V2

at final rest

Source: NTSB

(not to scale)

N

Lancaster, Ohio

(shoulder)

(shoulder)

U.S. 33

(North Memorial Drive)

Ety Road

Figure 1. Accident diagram. 

Probable Cause 

The National Transportation Safety Board determines that the probable cause of the 

accident was the truckdriver’s disregard for the red traffic signal, possibly due to drug 

impairment. 

Adopted: September 17, 2002
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2905 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2905

   To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on sodium petroleum 
                               sulfonate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 19, 2006

   Mr. Burr introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on sodium petroleum 
                               sulfonate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SODIUM PETROLEUM SULFONATE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.34.01 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to sodium petroleum sulfonate) 
is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2575 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain golf club fairway heads. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 6, 2006 

Mr. KERRY (for himself and Mr. KENNEDY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain golf club fairway 

heads. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN GOLF CLUB FAIRWAY HEADS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.95.06 Golf club fairway heads of 

stainless steel, each with a 

sole weight screw system 

(provided for in subheading 

9506.39.00) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 2575 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Community CollegesEducational MethodsExperiential LearningSchool Community ProgramsService LearningStudent ParticipationTwo Year Colleges

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
Subpart 26.3 - Historically Black Colleges

and Universities and Minority Institutions

Parent topic: Part 26 - Other Socioeconomic Programs

26.300 Scope of subpart.

(a) This subpart implements Executive Order12928 of September 16,1994, which promotes

participation of Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) and Minority Institutions (MIs)

in Federal procurement.

(b) This subpart does not pertain to contracts performed entirely outside the United States and its

outlying areas.

26.301 [Reserved]

26.302 General policy.

It is the policy of the Government to promote participation of HBCUs and MIs in Federal

procurement.

26.303 Data collection and reporting requirements.

Executive Order12928 requires periodic reporting to the President on the progress of departments

and agencies in complying with the laws and requirements mentioned in the Executive order.

26.304 Solicitation provision.

Insert the provision at 52.226-2, Historically Black College or University and Minority Institution

Representation, in solicitations exceeding the micro-purchase threshold, for research, studies,

supplies, or services of the type normally acquired from higher educational institutions.
#### Chester Johnson, Also Known as Chester Davidson, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent.

Submitted October 9, 2007;

decided November 19, 2007

Reported below, 2007 NY Slip Op 69287(U).

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 4:03cr56-RH/AK

KATHY MILLS LEE,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER DENYING §2255 MOTION

This matter is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation (document 233), to which no objections have been filed. The

report and recommendation is correct and is adopted as the opinion of the court,

except that I have not reviewed or given any weight to the materials in the

government websites cited in the report and recommendation. It bears noting, too,

that a full and fair jury selection proceeding was conducted without any basis for

believing that any of the seated jurors was biased in any way. The defendant’s

contrary suggestions are simply incorrect. For these reasons,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED. The clerk must enter

Case 4:03-cr-00056-RH-AK Document 235 Filed 09/24/08 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 4:01cr13-RH/WCS and 4:05cv25-RH/WCS

judgment stating, “Defendant’s motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. §2255 (document

202) is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE.” The clerk must close the file.

SO ORDERED on September 24, 2008.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:03-cr-00056-RH-AK Document 235 Filed 09/24/08 Page 2 of 2
Case 3:20-cv-05853-MCR-MJF Document 1 Filed 09/02/20 Page 1 of 6
Case 3:20-cv-05853-MCR-MJF Document 1 Filed 09/02/20 Page 2 of 6
Case 3:20-cv-05853-MCR-MJF Document 1 Filed 09/02/20 Page 3 of 6
Case 3:20-cv-05853-MCR-MJF Document 1 Filed 09/02/20 Page 4 of 6
Case 3:20-cv-05853-MCR-MJF Document 1 Filed 09/02/20 Page 5 of 6
Case 3:20-cv-05853-MCR-MJF Document 1 Filed 09/02/20 Page 6 of 6
§ 400.205 Denial or termination of contract and administrative reassignment of business. Non-compliance with these standards will result in: ( a ) The denial of a Contract; or
( b ) Termination of an existing Contract.
In the event of denial or termination of the Contract, all crop insurance policies of the Corporation sold by the Contractor and all business pertaining thereto may be assumed by the Corporation and may be administratively reassigned by the Corporation to another Contractor.
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  accompanying  Quarterly Report of Eye Care Centers of
America,  Inc.  (the  "Company")  on  Form 10-Q (the "Report") for the quarterly
period  ended September 28, 2002, I, Alan E. Wiley, Executive Vice President and
Chief  Financial  Officer  of Eye Care Centers of America, Inc. (the "Company"),
hereby  certify  pursuant  under  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

(1)  such  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended;  and

(2)  the  information  contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  November  12,  2002           By:        /s/  Alan  E.  Wiley
                                                -------------------
                                                Alan  E.  Wiley
                                                Executive  Vice  President  and
                                                Chief  Financial  Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

GREGORY SCOTT, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-654-MEF

)

NORMENT SECURITY GROUP, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

RULE 26(f) ORDER

The parties are hereby reminded of the obligation, imposed by Rule 26(f) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to confer and to develop a proposed discovery plan. The

Rule 26(f) report containing the discovery plan shall be filed as soon as practicable but not

later than September 26, 2006.

The longstanding practice in this district is that dispositive motions shall be filed no

later than 90 days prior to the pretrial date. If the parties seek to vary from that schedule,

they should present, in the plan, specific case related reasons for the requested variance.

This case will be set for trial before the undersigned judge during one of that judge's

regularly scheduled civil trial terms. The pretrial date is normally set within four to six

weeks of a scheduled trial term. The dates of each judge's civil trial terms are available on

the court's website located at http://almd.uscourts.gov in the civil case information section.

This court may or may not hold a scheduling conference before issuing a scheduling

order. If the court holds a scheduling conference, counsel may participate in the scheduling

Case 2:06-cv-00654-MEF-WC Document 8 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

conference by conference call.

The scheduling order entered by the court will follow the form of the Uniform

Scheduling Order adopted by the judges of this court. The Uniform Scheduling Order is also

available on the court's website.

The report of the parties should comply with Form 35 of the Appendix of Forms to

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

DONE this the 7th day of September, 2006.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00654-MEF-WC Document 8 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3034 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3034

        To suspend temporarily the duty on titanium mononitride.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 24, 2006

  Mr. Frist (for himself and Mr. Alexander) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To suspend temporarily the duty on titanium mononitride.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TITANIUM MONONITRIDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.28.50        Titanium mononitride    Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           (CAS No. 25583-20-4)                                              31/09            ''
                           (provided for in                                                                    .
                           subheading
                           2850.00.07)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2014299EN.01003201.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 17.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 299/32 |

---

Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 46/2014 of 20 January 2014 implementing Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus

(
[Official Journal of the European Union L 16 of 21 January 2014](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2014_016_R_TOC)
)

On page 4, Annex:

for:

‘In Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 765/2006, entry No 210 shall be replaced by the following:’

,

read:

‘In Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 765/2006, entry No 199 shall be replaced by the following:’

;

on page 4, Annex, table, first column:

for:

‘210.’

,

read:

‘199.’

.

---
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 2012

- 0807 Directorate Identifier: 2011

-NM

- 191

-AD If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into a nd then out of the changed cell

. **Estimated Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- h ours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

c ost ( @ $8 5 /h our) Part s Cost Total Costs ( labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U

. S

. Fleet
Replacement 3.0 $ 255.00 $ 255.00 220 $56,100.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### The known number of product s in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $56,100 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $
**O n**  **- Condition Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- h ours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

( @ $8 5 /hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.0 0 

### $0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0. 00 $ 0.00 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES * NO

* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES * NO

* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:**  Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for either a Yes or No answer. YES NO Explanation: **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES * NO


### * Explanation 

### :