alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
52.215-18 Reversion or Adjustment of Plans for Postretirement Benefits (PRB) Other Than Pensions.       As prescribed in 15.408(j), insert the following clause:          Reversion or Adjustment of Plans for Postretirement Benefits (PRB) Other Than Pensions (July 2005)                                       (a) 						            The Contractor shall promptly notify the Contracting Officer in writing when the Contractor determines that it will terminate or reduce the benefits of a PRB plan.                                          (b) 						            If PRB fund assets revert or inure to the Contractor, or are constructively received by it under a plan termination or otherwise, the Contractor shall make a refund or give a credit to the Government for its equitable share as required by 31.205-6(o)(5) of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). When determining or agreeing on the method for recovery of the Government’s equitable share, the contracting parties should consider the following methods: cost reduction, amortizing the credit over a number of years (with appropriate interest), cash refund, or some other agreed upon method. Should the parties be unable to agree on the method for recovery of the Government’s equitable share, through good faith negotiations, the Contracting Officer shall designate the method of recovery.                                          (c) 						            The Contractor shall insert the substance of this clause in all subcontracts that meet the applicability requirements of FAR 15.408(j).                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.215 [Reserved]
H-100 Scope.

This appendix provides uniform debarment and suspension procedures to be followed by all

debarring and suspending officials.

Parent topic: APPENDIX H - DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION PROCEDURES
1 

### Ogulei, David

From: Ogulei, David

Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 2:47 PM

To: Ogulei, David Subject: Telephone Record - Call with SCAQMD - April 7, 2015

TELEPHONE RECORD

Record of Telephone Conversation Between David Ogulei, EPA, and the South Coast Air Quality Management Dist rict (SCAQMD)

Phone Call Initiated By: David Ogulei, Environmental Engineer, EPA

Date & Time of Call: April 7, 2015, 4:20 PM Central Time

Name & Title of Person Called: Dipankar Sarkar, Program Supervisor Science and Technology Advancement, SCAQMD

Phone Number: (909) 396-2273

Purpose of Call: To obtain an update on the SCAQMD’s plans to install and operate multimetals continuous emissions monitoring systems (CEMS)

Record of Conversation:

Mr. Sarkar explained that the SCAQMD has rented on e Xact multi-metals CEMS and one Xact fenceline monitor from Cooper Environmental Services (Cooper). The two instruments are being used to monitor emissions from two battery recycling fa cilities (Exide Technologies and Quemetco, Inc.). Mr. Sarkar stated that the SCAQMD intends to operate the multi-metals CEMS for 10 months and the Xact fenceline monitor for 4 months. At the conclusion of the current rental agr eement, the SCAQMD would decide whether they want to purchase each instrument, rent it for a longer period or return it to Cooper. Mr. Sarkar stated that the multimetals CEMS has so far been in operation for 3 weeks while the Xact fenceline monitor has been in operation

for 2 months and 2 weeks.

Mr. Sarkar stated that the SCAQMD has conducted calib ration tests and side-by-si de evaluations comparing measurements made by the multi-metals CEMS and the Xact fenceline monitor to concurrent measurements made through CARB test methods. However, complete ev aluation results are not yet available. According to Mr. Sarkar, preliminary test results show excellent ag reement between the Xact measurements and CARB test data especially at high concentrations. However, conc entrations close to the detection limit do not compare very well. Mr. Sarkar explained that they are able to remotely view and download the CEMS data through a

modem that was installed at the unit.

According to Mr. Sarkar, Exide and Quemetco are fu nding the multi-metals CEMS operation while the SCAQMD is funding the Xact fenceline monitor operation.

##
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Obagi MedicalProducts, Inc.**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report on Form 10-K of Obagi Medical Products, Inc.****for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Stephen Garcia, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)         The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| Date: March 15, 2007 |   | /s/ STEPHEN A. GARCIA         |
|----------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
|                 |   | Stephen A. Garcia             |
|                 |   | Chief Financial Officer       |
|                 |   | (Principal Financial Officer) |
|                 |   |                          |

 

----
Subpart 216.1 - SELECTING CONTRACT

TYPES

Parent topic: Part 216 - TYPES OF CONTRACTS

216.102 Policies.

In accordance with section 811 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Pub.

L. 112-239), use of any cost-reimbursement line item for the acquisition of production of major

defense acquisition programs is prohibited, unless the exception at 234.004(2)(ii) applies.

216.104 Factors in selecting contract type.

Contracting officers shall follow the principles and procedures in Principal Director, Defense Pricing

and Contracting memorandum dated April 1, 2016, entitled “Guidance on Using Incentive and Other

Contract Types,” when selecting and negotiating the most appropriate contract type for a given

procurement. See PGI 216.104 Factors in selecting contract type..

216.104-70 Research and development.

Follow the procedures at PGI 216.104-70 for selecting the appropriate research and development

contract type, and see 235.006 (b) for additional approval requirements.
217.7801 Prohibition.       In accordance with section 814 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Pub. L. 114-328) as amended by section 882 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Pub. L. 115-91), contracting officers shall not use reverse auctions when procuring items designated by the requiring activity as personal protective equipment or an aviation critical safety item, when the requiring activity advises the contracting officer that the level of quality or failure of the equipment or item could result in combat casualties. See 252.209-7010 for the definition and identification of critical safety items.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 217.78 - REVERSE AUCTIONS
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

VFS LEASING CO., )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06cv638-SRW

)

G. F. KELLY, INC. D/b/a KELLY )

TRUCKING, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

Upon consideration of defendants' motion to extend schedule for summary judgment

(Doc. # 18), filed February 6, 2007, and for good cause, it is

ORDERED that the motion be and hereby is GRANTED. 

Done, this 7th day of February, 2007.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 19 Filed 02/07/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 5:99-cr-00005-LC Document 157 Filed 10/07/05 Page 1 of 1
ex10_41.htm


    
      EXHIBIT
10 .41 

    

     

    No:
C-B-07

    


    


    Hangzhou
Bank Co. Ltd.

    


    Financing
Guarantee Letter

    


    


    


    To:
Shenzhen Branch, Hangzhou Bank Co. Ltd.

    


    I am
willing to provide the debtor Shenzhen SCM Shenzhen Ltd., which signs the
Comprehensive Financing Line Contract (No. 2009SC000000841 ) with irrevocable
jointly and severally guarantee liabilities.

    


    Guarantee
validity: since the starting day of the obligation performance of the principal
contract till 2 years after the expiration date.

    


    Security
range: RMB43,750,000.00 (including bill discounts, acceptance, guarantee,
advance for L/C), interest (including compound interest) and penalty rate,
penalty, compensation and all the notary, evaluation, auction, litigation, legal
expenses occurred in order to recall the creditor rights.

    


    I
recognize and accept the validity of the Comprehensive Financing Line Contract
and this Financing Guarantee Letter, and commit to carry it out conscientiously.
In case of other guarantee or warranty of the principal claim guaranteed besides
that agreed in this Financing Guarantee Letter, it shall not influence any of
your rights and its fulfillment under this Financing Guarantee Letter, and I
shall not raise a plea against you on this basis.

    


    


    


    


    
      ID
number:  320107196903113412 

      


      Address: 
Hai Xia Ge 14G, Hai Zhu Cheng, Shenzhen, PRC 

       

      Telephone
No.:    +86-755-2661-1260 

      


      Postal
Code:   518054 

    

    


    


    


    


    


    


    


    


      Guarantor
(chop): Dehai Li

    /s/ Dehai
Li

    


    April
2009
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3046 

To suspend temporarily the duty on module and bracket asy-power steering. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. HATCH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on module and bracket 

asy-power steering. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MODULE AND BRACKET ASY-POWER STEERING. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.85.02 Controllers for electronic 

power assisted steering systems, rated at 80 amperes at 

12 V, designed for use in hybrid motor vehicles of heading 8703 (provided for in 

subheading 8537.10.90) ...... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


sroberts on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•S 3046 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

DUE PROCESS, LTD.,

Plaintiff,

vs. No. 3:03cv580/MCR/MD

ALTERNATIVE DEBT SERVICES, INC.,

et. al.,

Defendants.

______________________________________________________________________

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

In this civil action arising out of breach of contract and copyright infringement

claims, plaintiff was awarded more than $2,100,000 in damages and pre-judgment

interest (docs. 122-123). The court also found that plaintiff is entitled to statutory

attorney fees (doc. 122). Now before the undersigned on referral is plaintiff’s f fees

and costs (docs. 125-127). No response has been filed by any defendant.

The court is well familiar with the process of awarding fees in contractual

agreements that provide for a reasonable fee. “The first step in computing a

reasonable fee is to determine the lodestar, which is the product of the number of

hours reasonably worked by a lawyer and a reasonable hourly rate.” Dillard v. City

of Greensboro, 213 F.3d 1347, 1354 (11th Cir. 2000). Because the court is guided by

equitable principles in determining a reasonable fee, Durrett v. Jenkins Brickyard,

Inc. 678 F.2d 911, 917 (11th Cir. 1982)(citing Faraci v. Hickey-Freeman Co., 607 F.2d

1025, 1028 (2nd Cir. 1979), those principles must necessarily be employed in

determining both the reasonable hourly rates to be employed and the number of

hours reasonably worked.

Case 3:03-cv-00580-MCR-MD Document 129 Filed 08/14/07 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Plaintiff’s counsel’s affidavit and attachments (doc. 125) indicate that the

standard rate for the attorney who worked on this case is $125 per hour, and that

she spent 407.8 attorney hours on the case. Counsel also says these rates were

agreed to by her client, the plaintiff, and were paid by the plaintiff. 

Counsel seeks only the amount billed and paid by her client, the plaintiff, and

the undersigned finds the requested time and billing rates to be more than

reasonable. Therefore, the requested fee of $50,975.00 is reasonable. Plaintiff also

asks for a total of $2,739.24, to which no objection has been filed. 

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that the court award plaintiff’s

counsel, Diane Longoria, Esq., the sum of $50,975.00 as reasonable attorney fees

plus $2,739.24 in costs.

At Pensacola, Florida, this 14

th day of August, 2007.

 /s/ Miles Davis

MILES DAVIS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed

within ten days after being served a copy hereof. Any different deadline that may

appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only, and does not

control. A copy of any objections shall be served upon any other parties. Failure to

object may limit the scope of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. §

636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11th Cir. 1988).

Case 3:03-cv-00580-MCR-MD Document 129 Filed 08/14/07 Page 2 of 2
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

LAVAROS DAVIS,

DC# M63150,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 3:20-cv-5935-MCR-HTC

SGT. DANIELS, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

All named defendants in action provide notice, through undersigned 

counsel, that Settlement has been reached in this case, and the documentation is 

currently being worked on. Defendants and Plaintiff require thirty (30) days in 

which to complete the required settlement documentation. Once the 

documentation is completed and the terms of the settlement are fulfilled, Plaintiff 

and Defendants will file a Joint Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice.

 Respectfully Submitted,

ASHLEY MOODY

ATTORNEY GENERAL

/s/ Ravi N. Sharma 

 Ravi N. Sharma

Assistant Attorney General

Case 3:20-cv-05935-HTC Document 149 Filed 06/16/23 Page 1 of 2
2

Florida Bar No.: 1019119

Office of the Attorney General

The Capitol PL-01

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1050

Telephone: (850) 414-3300

Facsimile: (850) 488-4872

ravi.sharma@myfloridalegal.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice of Settlement 

was electronically filed with the Clerk of Court and served on all counsel of record 

using CM/ECF on June 15, 2023. 

/s/ Ravi N. Sharma

Ravi N. Sharma, Esq.

Case 3:20-cv-05935-HTC Document 149 Filed 06/16/23 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2965 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2965

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to provide 
       duty free treatment for Propylene Glycol Alginates (PGA).

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 23, 2006

 Mr. Santorum introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to provide 
       duty free treatment for Propylene Glycol Alginates (PGA).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DUTY FREE TREATMENT FOR ALGINIC ACIDS, ITS SALTS AND ESTERS.

    (a) In General.--Subheading 3913.10.0000 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended in the general subcolumn of 
column 1 rate of duty, by striking ``4.2%'' and inserting ``Free''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the date that is 15 days after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Louis Mascitelli, Petitioner, v. Board of Regents of the State of New York et al., Respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

Proceeding under CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Board .of Regents which revoked petitioner’s license to practice medicine upon finding him guilty (1) of having been convicted of a crime, within the purview of section 6514 (subd. 2, par. [b]) of the Education Law, upon his plea of guilty of assault, third degree, in satisfaction of the first and second counts of an indictment charging abortion; and (2) of performing criminal abortions, within the purview of section 6514 (subd. 2, par [e] )■ of the Education Law, upon four women. The plea was properly “regarded as an admission of some unlawful physical or medical procedure in relation to the pregnant wom[e]n named in the indictment ”, *(Matter of Jones*v. *Allen,*4 A D 2d 994; *Matter of Zimmerman*v. *Board of Regents,*31 A D 2d 560, mot. for lv. to app. den. 23 N Y 2d 647; *Matter of Ciofalo*v. *Board of Regents,*23 A D 2d 926, mot. for lv. to app. den. 16 N Y 2d 481, cert. den. 382 U. S. 942.) We find no basis for petitioner’s reliance upon *Spevack*v. *Klein*(385 U. S. 511), which is in no way apposite, as authority to the contrary. The second specification -— that of performing abortions—was fully proven by the adequate and competent testimony of the four women named in the specification. We find petitioner’s contentions and assignments of error with respect thereto insubstantial and not such as to require discussion. We perceive no reason to *702disturb the board’s discretion with regard to the measure of discipline imposed. Determination confirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Greenblott, JJ., concur in memorandum Per *Curiam.*
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2843 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain footwear with outer soles of 

rubber or plastics and with open toes or heels. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 18, 2006 

Mr. BROWNBACK introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain footwear with 

outer soles of rubber or plastics and with open toes 

or heels. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN FOOTWEAR WITH OUTER SOLES OF 

4 RUBBER OR PLASTICS AND WITH OPEN TOES 

5 OR HEELS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 2843 IS 

‘‘ 9902.13.82 Footwear with outer soles of 

rubber or plastics and uppers of textile materials 

other than of vegetable fibers, with open toes or open 

heels, the foregoing other 

than house slippers and 

other than footwear for 

women (provided for in subheading 6404.19.30) ............ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3043 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain refracting and reflecting 

telescopes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain refracting and 

reflecting telescopes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN REFRACTING AND REFLECTING TELE4 SCOPES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 3043 IS 

‘‘ 9902.13.86 Refracting telescopes with 60 mm or 

smaller objective lenses and reflecting 

telescopes with 76 mm or smaller mirrors, and parts and accessories thereof 

(provided for in subheading 9005.80.40 

or 9005.90.80) ......................................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
§ 636.5 National priorities. ( a ) The following national priorities will be used in WHIP implementation: ( 1 ) Promote the restoration of declining or important native fish and wildlife habitats;
( 2 ) Protect, restore, develop, or enhance fish and wildlife habitat to benefit at-risk species;
( 3 ) Reduce the impacts of invasive species on fish and wildlife habitats;
( 4 ) Protect, restore, develop, or enhance declining or important aquatic wildlife species' habitats; and
( 5 ) Protect, restore, develop, or enhance important migration and other movement corridors for wildlife.
( b ) NRCS, with advice of other Federal agencies, will undertake periodic reviews of the national priorities and the effects of program delivery at the State, tribal, and local levels to adapt the program to address emerging resource issues. NRCS will: ( 1 ) Use the national priorities to guide the allocation of WHIP funds to the State offices;
( 2 ) Use the national priorities in conjunction with State, tribal, and local priorities to assist with prioritization and selection of WHIP applications; and
( 3 ) Periodically review and update the national priorities utilizing input from the public, Indian tribes, and affected stakeholders to ensure that the program continues to address priority resource concerns.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

VFS LEASING CO., )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06cv638-SRW

) (WO)

G. F. KELLY, INC. D/b/a KELLY )

TRUCKING, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

This action is presently before the court on plaintiff’s second motion to continue the

briefing schedule on plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, which was filed four months

ago. The court has previously extended the briefing schedule three times, twice on the motion

of defendant and once on plaintiff’s motion. Upon consideration of the motion, it is

ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. However, the parties are advised that the

court will not further extend the briefing schedule, absent exceptional circumstances.

DONE, this 30th day of March, 2007.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 26 Filed 03/30/2007 Page 1 of 1