alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2953 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2953

 To reduce temporarily the duty on certain men's footwear covering the 
            ankle with coated or laminated textile fabrics.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 23, 2006

  Mr. Carper introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To reduce temporarily the duty on certain men's footwear covering the 
            ankle with coated or laminated textile fabrics.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN MEN'S FOOTWEAR COVERING THE ANKLE WITH COATED OR 
              LAMINATED TEXTILE FABRICS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.64.09      Men's footwear,     20%          No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         covering the                                                       31/2009
                         ankle, valued
                         over $20/pair
                         designed to be
                         worn over, or in
                         lieu of, other
                         footwear as a
                         protection
                         against water,
                         oil, grease or
                         chemicals or cold
                         or inclement
                         weather where
                         such protection
                         includes
                         protection
                         against water
                         that is imparted
                         by the use of a
                         coated or
                         laminated textile
                         fabric (except
                         footwear with
                         waterproof
                         injection molded
                         bottoms, i.e.
                         comprising a
                         complete outer
                         sole and all or
                         part of the
                         upper) (provided
                         in subheading
                         6404.19.20)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EX-10.3






Exhibit 10.3




EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION




     THIS EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION (this “AGREEMENT EXTENSION”) is entered into effective the
13th day of May, 2009, by and between The Franklin Savings and Loan Company, a savings
and loan association organized under the laws of the State of Ohio (the “EMPLOYER”), and Daniel T.
Voelpel (the “EMPLOYEE”).



WITNESSETH:




     WHEREAS, the EMPLOYEE is currently employed as the Senior Vice President and CFO of the
Employer; and



     WHEREAS, the EMPLOYER and the EMPLOYEE are parties to an Employment Agreement dated July 1,
2006, and amended December 30, 2008 (the “AGREEMENT”); and



     WHEREAS, the current expiration date of the AGREEMENT is July 1, 2011 and



     WHEREAS, Section 1 of the AGREEMENT provides that the EMPLOYER’s BOARD may extend the term of
the AGREEMENT; and



     WHEREAS, as a result of the skill, knowledge, performance and experience of the EMPLOYEE, the
BOARD of the EMPLOYER has determined that the AGREEMENT should be extended; and



     WHEREAS, the EMPLOYEE desires to continue to serve as the Senior Vice President and CFO of the
EMPLOYER and consents to the extension of the AGREEMENT;



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants herein contained, the
EMPLOYER and the EMPLOYEE hereby agree as follows:



     1. Extension of EMPLOYMENT TERM. The EMPLOYMENT TERM of the AGREEMENT is hereby
extended and the AGREEMENT shall terminate and expire on March 31, 2012.



     2. Effect of Prior Agreements. All of the terms and conditions of the AGREEMENT shall
remain in full force and effect during the EMPLOYMENT TERM, as extended by this AGREEMENT
EXTENSION.



     3. Definitions. Capitalized terms used in this AGREEMENT EXTENSION without definition
shall have the meanings given to such terms in the AGREEMENT.



[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK; SIGNATURES FOLLOW]




 









 








     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the EMPLOYER has caused this AGREEMENT EXTENSION to be executed by its
duly authorized officer, and the EMPLOYEE has consented to and signed this AGREEMENT EXTENSION,
each as of the date first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 
	EMPLOYER

FRANKLIN SAVINGS AND LOAN COMPANY

	 	 	EMPLOYEE

/s/ Daniel T. Voelpel

	

	 	 	
Name: Daniel T Voelpel






	 	 	 	 	 
	By:  	/s/
Gretchen J. Schmidt

 	 	 
	 	Gretchen J. Schmidt
 	 	 
	 	Its: President
52.247-21 Contractor Liability for Personal

Injury and/or Property Damage.

As prescribed in 47.207-7(c), insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts for

transportation or for transportation-related services:

Contractor Liability for Personal Injury and/or Property Damage (Apr 1984)

(a) The Contractor assumes responsibility for all damage or injury to persons or property occasioned

through the use, maintenance, and operation of the Contractor’s vehicles or other equipment by, or

the action of, the Contractor or the Contractor’s employees and agents.

(b) The Contractor, at the Contractor’s expense, shall maintain adequate public liability and property

damage insurance during the continuance of this contract, insuring the Contractor against all claims

for injury or damage.

(c) The Contractor shall maintain Workers’ Compensation and other legally required insurance with

respect to the Contractor’s own employees and agents.

(d) The Government shall in no event be liable or responsible for damage or injury to any person or

property occasioned through the use, maintenance, or operation of any vehicle or other equipment

by, or the action of, the Contractor or the Contractor’s employees and agents in performing under

this contract, and the Government shall be indemnified and saved harmless against claims for

damage or injury in such cases.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.247 [Reserved]
201.304 Agency control and compliance

procedures.

Departments and agencies and their component organizations may issue acquisition regulations as

necessary to implement or supplement the FAR or DFARS.

(1)(i) Approval of the USD(A&S) is required before including in a department/agency or component

supplement, or any other contracting regulation document such as a policy letter or clause book, any

policy, procedure, clause, or form that—

(A) Has a significant effect beyond the internal operating procedures of the agency; or

(B) Has a significant cost or administrative impact on contractors or offerors.

(ii) Except as provided in paragraph (2) of this section, the USD(A&S) has delegated authority to the

Principal Director of Defense Pricing and Contracting (DPC) to approve or disapprove the policies,

procedures, clauses, and forms subject to paragraph (1)(i) of this section.

(2) In accordance with 41 U.S.C. 1304, a new requirement for a certification by a contractor or

offeror may not be included in a department/agency or component procurement regulation unless—

(i) The certification requirement is specifically imposed by statute; or

(ii) Written justification for such certification is provided to the Secretary of Defense by USD(A&S),

and the Secretary of Defense approves in writing the inclusion of such certification requirement.

(3) Contracting activities must obtain the appropriate approval (see 201.404 ) for any class deviation

(as defined in FAR Subpart 1.4) from the FAR or DFARS, before its inclusion in a department/agency

or component supplement or any other contracting regulation document such as a policy letter or

clause book.

(4) Each department and agency must develop and, upon approval by OUSD(A&S)DPC, implement,

maintain, and comply with a plan for controlling the use of clauses other than those prescribed by

FAR or DFARS. Additional information on department and agency clause control plan requirements

is available at PGI 201.304 (4).

(5) Departments and agencies must submit requests for the Secretary of Defense, USD(A&S), and

OUSD(A&S)DPAC approvals required by this section through the Director of the DAR Council.

Procedures for requesting approval of department and agency clauses are provided at PGI 201.304

(5).

(6) The Principal Director, DPC publishes changes to the DFARS in the Federal Register at

https://www.federalregister.gov and on the DPC website at

https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/change_notices.html. Each change includes an effective date.

Unless guidance accompanying a change states otherwise, contracting officers must include any

new or revised clauses, provisions, or forms in solicitations issued on or after the effective date of

the change.

Parent topic: Subpart 201.3 - AGENCY ACQUISITION REGULATIONS
§ 760.812 Production losses; participant responsibility. ( a ) Where available and determined accurate by FSA, RMA loss records will be used for insured crops.
( b ) If RMA loss records are not available, or if the FSA county committee determines the RMA loss records are inaccurate or incomplete, or if the FSA county committee makes inquiry, participants are responsible for: ( 1 ) Retaining or providing, when required, the best verifiable or reliable production records available for the crop;
( 2 ) Summarizing all the production evidence;
( 3 ) Accounting for the total amount of unit production for the crop, whether or not records reflect this production;
( 4 ) Providing the information in a manner that can be easily understood by the county committee; and
( 5 ) Providing supporting documentation if the county committee has reason to question the damaging weather event or question whether all production has been accounted for.
( c ) In determining production under this section, the participant must supply verifiable or reliable production records to substantiate production to the county committee. If the eligible crop was sold or otherwise disposed of through commercial channels, production records include: commercial receipts; settlement sheets; warehouse ledger sheets; load summaries; or appraisal information from a loss adjuster acceptable to FSA. If the eligible crop was farm-stored, sold, fed to livestock, or disposed of in means other than commercial channels, production records for these purposes include: truck scale tickets; appraisal information from a loss adjuster acceptable to FSA; contemporaneous diaries; or other documentary evidence, such as contemporaneous measurements.
( d ) Participants must provide all records for any production of a crop that is grown with an arrangement, agreement, or contract for guaranteed payment.
5102.101 Definitions.

“Army Acquisition Executive (AAE)” means the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition,

Logistics and Technology), as designated by the Secretary of the Army.

“Chief of the contracting office” means the person having direct responsibility for the operation of a

contracting office as defined in FAR 2.1. This person also has procurement authorities assigned by

the Federal Acquisition Regulation and its supplements and performs contracting authorities as

delegated by the head of the contracting activity or senior contracting official.

“Head of the agency” means the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and

Technology) when executing authorities of the head of the agency for contracting procurement

matters pursuant to laws and regulations, as designated by the Secretary of the Army.

“Head of the contracting activity” means the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army (Procurement)

for a contracting activity that does not have a head of the contracting activity specifically

designated. This authority shall not be further delegated. See delegations in Appendix GG.

“Senior contracting official (SCO)” means the senior official for or within a contracting activity

responsible for the performance of contracting authorities delegated by the head of the contracting

activity. (See 5101.693.)

“Senior Procurement Executive (SPE)” means the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition,

Logistics and Technology), as designated by the Secretary of the Army.

Parent topic: Subpart 5102.1 - Definitions
52.247-62 Specific Quantities Unknown.

As prescribed in 47.305-16(d)(2), insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts when total

requirements and destinations to which shipments will be made are known, but the specific quantity

to be shipped to each destination cannot be predetermined. This clause protects the interests of both

the Government and the contractor during the course of the performance of the contract., insert the

following clause in solicitations and contracts when total requirements and destinations to which

shipments will be made are known, but the specific quantity to be shipped to each destination

cannot be predetermined. This clause protects the interests of both the Government and the

contractor during the course of the performance of the contract.

Specific Quantities Unknown (Apr 1984)

(a) For the purpose of evaluating "f.o.b. destination" offers, the Government estimates that the

quantity specified will be shipped to the destinations indicated:

Estimated Quantity Destination(s)

_______________ _______________

_______________ _______________

(b) If the quantity shipped to each destination varies from the quantity estimated, and if the variation

results in a change in the transportation costs, appropriate adjustment shall be- made.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.247 [Reserved]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-50094

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

SANTOS ALONSO-MARTINEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:18-CR-93-1

Before CLEMENT, ELROD, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Santos Alonso-Martinez appeals the 48-month above-guidelines 

sentence and three-year term of supervised release imposed following his 

guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry into the United States. He argues that 

the enhancement of his sentence pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1), which 

increased the maximum term of imprisonment to ten years of imprisonment, 

is unconstitutional because of the treatment of the provision as a sentencing 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 29, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-50094 Document: 00515097055 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/29/2019
No. 19-50094

2

factor rather than as an element of a separate offense that must be proved to 

a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. He concedes that the issue whether a 

sentencing enhancement under § 1326(b) must be alleged in the indictment 

and proved to a jury is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 

U.S. 224 (1998). However, he seeks to preserve the issue for possible Supreme 

Court review because, he argues, subsequent Supreme Court decisions indicate 

that the Court may reconsider this issue.

In Almendarez-Torres, 523 U.S. at 239-47, the Supreme Court held that 

for purposes of a statutory sentencing enhancement, a prior conviction is not a 

fact that must be alleged in an indictment or found by a jury beyond a 

reasonable doubt. This court has held that subsequent Supreme Court 

decisions did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See United States v. Wallace, 

759 F.3d 486, 497 (5th Cir. 2014) (considering the effect of Alleyne v. United 

States, 570 U.S. 99 (2013)); United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 

625-26 (5th Cir. 2007) (considering the effect of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 

U.S. 466 (2000)). Thus, Alonso-Martinez’s argument is foreclosed.

Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is 

GRANTED, the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to 

file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 19-50094 Document: 00515097055 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/29/2019
§ 58.643 Frequency of sampling. ( a ) *Microbiological.* Representative samples shall be taken from each type of mix, and for the finished frozen product one sample from each flavor made.
( b ) *Composition.* Representative samples shall be tested for fat and solids-not-fat on each type of mix manufactured. Spot checks shall be made on the finished products as often as is necessary to assure compliance with composition standards.
( c ) *Weight or volume control.* Representative samples of the packaged products shall be checked during the packaging operation to assure compliance with the stated volume on the container as well as weight and overrun requirements.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 5:99cr25/LAC

JAMES EDWIN PRATT,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER

This cause is before the Court on remand from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.

The remand is limited to a determination of whether there exists excusable neglect or good

cause to justify Defendant’s untimely filing of his notice of appeal from the Court’s June 16,

2006, order. While the Court would ordinarily order Defendant to show cause, the record

already demonstrates that the Court order in question was not mailed to Defendant until June

27, 2006. See doc. 102, postmarked envelope attached as an exhibit. Since Defendant’s

notice of appeal was filed on July, 7, 2006, even without considering mailing times and the

prisoner mailbox rule, the filing of the notice of appeal was timely. Thus, the Court finds

that Defendant’s notice of appeal should be deemed timely filed. 

Case 5:99-cr-00025-LC-EMT Document 107 Filed 08/30/06 Page 1 of 2
Case No. 5:99cr25/LAC Page 2 of 2

As directed by the Eleventh Circuit, the Clerk is directed to return the file to the

Eleventh Circuit for further proceedings.

ORDERED on this 30th day of August, 2006.

 s/L.A. Collier 

Lacey A. Collier

Senior United States District Judge

Case 5:99-cr-00025-LC-EMT Document 107 Filed 08/30/06 Page 2 of 2
156 So.2d 602

#### Joel DAVIS v. T. L. JAMES AND COMPANY, Inc., et al.

No. 46905.

Oct. 9, 1963.

In re: Joel Davis applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Washington. 154 So.2d 640.

Writ refused. There is no error of law in the judgment of the Court of Appeal.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ No. 1D 19

- 0517

_____________________________ M AURICE L ASHAWN M ANNING , Petitioner,

v. S TATE O F F LORIDA , Respondent.

_____________________________ Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel

— Original Jurisdiction

. August 5, 2019

P ER C URIAM
. The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits. R AY , C.J., and K ELSEY and W INOKUR , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________2 Maurice Lashawn Manning, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2814 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2814

   To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide for support of 
funeral ceremonies for veterans provided by details that consist solely 
 of members of veterans organizations and other organizations, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 16, 2006

   Mr. Burns introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide for support of 
funeral ceremonies for veterans provided by details that consist solely 
 of members of veterans organizations and other organizations, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUPPORT OF FUNERAL CEREMONIES FOR VETERANS PROVIDED BY 
              DETAILS CONSISTING SOLELY OF MEMBERS OF VETERANS 
              ORGANIZATIONS AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS.

    (a) Support of Funeral Ceremonies.--Section 1491 of title 10, 
United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsections (e), (f), (g), and (h) as 
        subsections (f), (g), (h), and (i), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (d) the following new 
        subsection (e):
    ``(e) Funeral Ceremonies for Veterans Provided by Details Other 
Than Funeral Honor Details.--In the case of funeral honors at the 
funeral of a veteran that are provided by a detail that consists solely 
of members of veterans organizations or other organizations referred to 
in subsection (b)(2), the Secretary of the military department of which 
the veteran was a member shall support the provision of such funeral 
honors through provision to each person who participates in the detail 
the daily stipend prescribed under subsection (d)(2).''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Such section is further amended--
            (1) in subsection (d)(2), by inserting ``and subsection 
        (e)'' after ``paragraph (1)(A)''; and
            (2) in paragraph (1) of section (f), as redesignated by 
        subsection (a)(1) of this section, by inserting ``(other than a 
        requirement in subsection (e)'' after ``pursuant to this 
        section''.
                                 <all>
```