alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

MARIE TOOLE and )

CHRIS TOOLE, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv652-MHT

) 

MATTHEW CHUPP, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

 RULE 26(F) ORDER

The parties are reminded of the obligation, imposed

by Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to

confer and to develop a proposed discovery plan.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Rule 26(f) report

containing the discovery plan shall be filed as soon as

practicable but not later than September 25, 2006.

The longstanding practice in this district is that

dispositive motions shall be filed no later than 90 days

prior to the pretrial date. If the parties seek to vary

from that schedule, they should present, in the plan,

specific case-related reasons for the requested variance.

Case 2:06-cv-00652-MHT-WC Document 11 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 1 of 3
2

In their Rule 26(f) report, however, the parties should

assume that the 90-day requirement will apply.

This case will be set for trial before the

undersigned judge during one of that judge's regularly

scheduled civil trial terms, within 7 to 10 months of

this order if a term is available and, if not available,

then as soon as possible thereafter. The pretrial date

is normally set within four to six weeks of a scheduled

trial term. The dates of each judge's civil trial terms

are available on the court's website located at

<http://almd.uscourts.gov> in the civil case information

section.

The court may or may not hold a scheduling conference

before issuing a scheduling order. If the court holds a

scheduling conference, counsel may participate in the

scheduling conference by conference call.

The scheduling order entered by the court will follow

the form of the Uniform Scheduling Order adopted by the

Case 2:06-cv-00652-MHT-WC Document 11 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 2 of 3
judges of this court. The Uniform Scheduling Order is

also available on the court's website.

The report of the parties should comply with Form 35

of the Appendix of Forms to the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

DONE, this the 12th day of September, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00652-MHT-WC Document 11 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 3 of 3
Directors' Annual Compensation



 Exhibit 10.5 
 Pinnacle Bankshares Corporation 
 Directors’ Annual Compensation 
 As of March 31, 2009 
  

				
	  	  	Amount
	 Annual Retainer
	  		
		
	 Service as Director for the Company
	  	$	2,000
	 Service as Director for the Bank
	  	$	4,000
		
	 Additional Retainer for Chair of Audit Committee
	  	$	1,500
		
	 Additional Retainer for Chair of Compensation Committee
	  	$	1,000
		
	 Meeting Fees (Non-Employee Directors)
	  		
		
	 Committee Meetings for the Company
	  	$	250 per meeting
	 Committee Meetings for the Bank
	  	$	250 per meeting
#### § 75.28 When a request for an appeal inspection may be withdrawn.

A request for an appeal inspection may be withdrawn by the applicant at any time before the appeal inspection is performed: *Provided,* that, the appellant shall pay any expenses incurred in connection with the appeal as provided in § 75.46.
EXHIBIT 34.3

LOGO

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors of JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association

We
have examined managements assertion, included in the accompanying Managements Report on Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association (the "Company") complied with the
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB as of December 31, 2006 and for the period from October 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period") for the
asset-backed securities transactions backed by residential mortgages, home equity loans, auto loans, credit cards, dealer floor plans, retail installment contracts and manufactured housing contracts, that were registered with the Securities and
Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, where the related asset-backed securities were outstanding during the Reporting Period (the "Platform"), excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(i)-(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i)-(vi),
1122(d)(3)(i)-(iv) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Appendix A to managements assertion identifies the individual
asset-backed transactions and securities defined by management as constituting the Platform. Management is responsible for the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements
assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination
included testing of selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and
performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our
procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by
this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements assertion that JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for
the period ended December 31, 2006 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

LOGO

New York, New York

March 12, 2007
Alicia Klepfer- EPA Carbon Hearing Testimony- Chicago, IL- 5/24/12
My name is Alicia Klepfer and Iwould like to thank the EPA for holding this hearing and giving me the opportunityto testify in favor ofthe proposed carbon standards for new coal plants.

Iam the Director ofthe UniversityofChicago Climate Action Network, orUCAN. Earlier this year, our group gathered a panel ofspeakers to discuss solutions for climate change. Over 100 students attended our event and gathered to listen as a politician, an economist, a solar energy company founder, and a Sierra Club organizer told the room thatthere are ways to combatthe growing amounts ofgreen house gases in our atmosphere. They all identified challenges in that fight, butthe one common thread among all4 speakers was that change is not possible withoutgovernment regulation to stand behind
our determination. Currently, there are no regulations or limits on how much carbon can be released into the air from coal plants. There are no regulations even though carbon is proven to be one ofthe leading factors ofclimate change.

Itried to explain that to one ofthe 3'd grade students that Itutor here in Chicago. To explain that to a 9 year old, Ihad to tell him that to make electricity the power plants needed to burn fossil fuels, butthere aren'tany restrictions on how much smoke and other things is released even though we have the technology to preventit. Simplified and stripped ofpropaganda from greedy energy companies, this system ofprofitwithout respect for externalities is illogical and irresponsible.

Coal plant pollution is unnecessary and should be prevented with green technology and energyreplacements. Without carbon standards, we prove ourselves to be shortsighted and ignorant. Ifwe can't see the carbon and it doesn't cost us any money, whyworry about it? But temperature fluctuations and ocean acidification prove that carbon pollution is a veryreal and very harmful phenomenon.

Even within the city ofChicago, carbon is also proving to be more than a climate issue. As I'm sureyou've heard, carbon pollution makes many othertimes ofair pollution more severe, such as mercury and soot. But as a student in Chicago who grew up in Colorado, I
never had to worry about dirty air. Igotto see clear skies and snowy mountain peaks while Iran outside and played, never seeing hazy air from smog. It wasn't until Icameto Chicago and got chronic sinus infections that Irealized Iwas literally allergic to the polluted air within the city.

Iwill be 20 injuly, which means Ihopefully have another 70 or 80 years on this planet. I must admit, as a nerdy UChicago student, Iam a fan ofscience fiction and fantasy. So a world with a dead ocean, rising sea levels, blistering summers, and freezing winters sounds like some cool story set-up in a book I'd read. When Ithink about doing that to my planet, though, it makes me feel sick. Idon'twant to do that to my planet, and I sincerely hope the EPA will pass it's proposed carbon standards.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

May 3, 2007

NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE

To: Attorney John W. Clark, Jr.

Case Style: David W. Jahn v. Reginald James Washington, et al.

Case Number: 2:06-cv-623-MEF

Referenced Pleading(s): Notice of Deposition

Docket Entry Number(s): 28

The referenced pleading was electronically filed on 5/2/2007 in this case and is not in

compliance with the local rules and/or administrative procedures of this court. 

******This pleading is regarding discovery and is not allowed pursuant to Local Rule 5.1

NON-FILING OF CIVIL DISCOVERY.

The pleading is hereby STRICKEN from the record and the parties are instructed to

disregard the entry of this pleading on the court’s docket. Parties should be aware that the

striking of this entry does not affect their responsibilities as to the discovery process.

Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 29 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 1 of 1
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 131759 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 131759 COA: 260958 Dickinson CC: 04-003208-FH DEBRA MARIE CARR, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 6, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t1120 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2006

Clerk
1N THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABA4'^ C F tJ ED

EASTERN DIVISION

JU%.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

V. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06-cv-627

MANDO AMERICA CORPORATION,

Opelika, Alabama,

Garnishee,

EPJCA L. MURPHY,

Defendant.

APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF GARNISHMENT

The United States of America makes application in accordance with 28 U.S.C. Section

3205(b)(1) to the Clerk of the United States District Court to issue a Writ of Garnishment upon the

Judgment entered against the defendant, Erica L. Murphy, in the above cited action in the amount

of $10,342.33, plus costs and interest. The last four digits of defendant's social security number is

0909, and the defendant's last known address is 1065 Scales Circle, Valley, Alabama 36854-46 10.

In addition, the United States respectfully request a surcharge of 10 percent of the total amount due

as allowed under Title 28 U.S.C. §3011. There is a balance due of $13,196.88, as of July 14, 2008,

which includes a 10 percent surcharge of $1,199.72.

Case 3:06-cv-00627-WKW-SRW Document 12 Filed 07/18/2008 Page 1 of 2
Demand for payment of the above-stated debt was made upon the debtor not less than 30

days from July 16, 2008, but defendant has failed to satisfy this debt.

The Garnishee is believed to owe or will owe money to the judgment debtor, or is in

possession of property of the debtor, in which the debtor has a substantial non exempt interest.

The name and address of the Garnishee or his authorized agent is:

Mando America Corporation

4201 North Park Drive

Opelika, AL 36801

DATED: July /7 , 2008.

LEURA G. CANARY

U -tedta t rney

j

R. RANDOLPH NEELEY

Assistant United States Attorney

Bar Number: 9083-E56R

Post Office Box 197

Montgomery, AL 36101-0197

Telephone No.: (334) 223-7280

Facsimile No.: (334) 223-7418

E-mail: rand.neeley@usdoj.gov

Case 3:06-cv-00627-WKW-SRW Document 12 Filed 07/18/2008 Page 2 of 2
```

[107th Congress Public Law 244]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ244.107]

[[Page 116 STAT. 1503]]

Public Law 107-244
107th Congress

                            Joint Resolution

 
 Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2003, and 
     for other purposes. <<NOTE: Oct. 18, 2002 -  [H.J. Res. 123]>> 

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law 107-229 is 
further amended by striking the date specified in section 107(c) 
and <<NOTE: Ante, p. 1492.>> inserting in lieu thereof ``November 22, 
2002''.

    Approved October 18, 2002.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.J. Res. 123:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 148 (2002):
            Oct. 16, considered and passed House and Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### § 785.13 OMB Control Number.

The information collection requirements in this regulation have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget and assigned OMB control number 0560-0165.
#### § 764.253 Limitations.

The applicant must comply with the general limitations established at § 764.102.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 233 (Monday, December 6, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75693-75694]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30397]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Geological Survey


National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program (NCGMP) Advisory 
Committee

AGENCY: U.S. Geological Survey, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of audio conference.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 75694]]

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Public Law 106-148, the NCGMP Advisory Committee 
will hold an audio conference call on Wednesday, January 26, 2011, from 
1 p.m.-3 p.m. Eastern Standard Time. The Committee will hear updates on 
progress of the NCGMP toward fulfilling the purposes of the National 
Geological Mapping Act of 1992; the Federal, State, and education 
components of the NCGMP; and the National Geological and Geophysical 
Data Preservation Program.

DATES: January 26, 2011, from 1 p.m.-3 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For the phone number and access code, 
please contact Stephanie Brown, U.S. Geological Survey, Mail Stop 908, 
National Center, Reston, Virginia 20192, (703) 648-6948.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Meetings of the National Cooperative 
Geologic Mapping Program Advisory Committee are open to the Public.

    Dated: November 19, 2010.
Kevin T. Gallagher,
Acting Associate Director for Core Science Systems.
[FR Doc. 2010-30397 Filed 12-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4311-AM-P
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2974 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2974

   To suspend temporarily the duty on certain laminate wood molding 
                 measuring less than 4-feet in length.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 23, 2006

  Mr. Isakson introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on certain laminate wood molding 
                 measuring less than 4-feet in length.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN LAMINATE WOOD MOLDING MEASURING LESS THAN 4-FEET IN 
              LENGTH.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.44.11        Certain laminate wood   Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           molding measuring                                                 31/2009          ''
                           less than 4-feet in                                                                 .
                           length (provided for
                           in subheading
                           4411.29.90)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2879 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Spirodiclofen. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 19, 2006 

Mr. BURR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Spirodiclofen. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SPIRODICLOFEN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.12.02 2,2-Dimethylbutanoic acid, 

3-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-2-oxo1-oxaspiro(4.5)dec-3-en-4-yl 

ester (Spirodiclofen) (CAS 

No. 148477–71–8) (provided 

for in subheading 

2932.29.10) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•S 2879 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-19 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-19 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-19 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 3 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) Case No.: 2:06mj073-DRB

 )

ALFREDO RAMIREZ-MENDEZ )

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

COMES NOW the undersigned counsel, Donnie W. Bethel, and enters his appearance

on behalf of Defendant, Alfredo Ramirez-Mendez, in the above-styled case.

Dated this 28 day of July, 2006. th

Respectfully submitted, 

s/ Donnie W. Bethel

DONNIE W. BETHEL

Assistant Federal Defender

201 Monroe Street, Suite 407

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Phone: (334) 834-2099

Fax: (334) 834-0353

E-mail:don_bethel@fd.org

IN Bar Code: 14773-49

Case 2:06-mj-00073-DRB Document 7 Filed 07/28/2006 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) Case No.: 2:06mj073-DRB

 )

ALFREDO RAMIREZ-MENDEZ )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on July 28, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of

the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following:

David Cooke, Esq., Assistant U. S. Attorney, One Court Square, Suite 201, Montgomery,

Alabama 36104. 

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Donnie W. Bethel

DONNIE W. BETHEL

Assistant Federal Defender

201 Monroe Street, Suite 407

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Phone: (334) 834-2099

Fax: (334) 834-0353

E-mail:don_bethel@fd.org

IN Bar Code: 14773-49

Case 2:06-mj-00073-DRB Document 7 Filed 07/28/2006 Page 2 of 2
# L_2014201EN.01000301.xml

| 10.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 201/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 201/3

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 744/2014

of 9 July 2014

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Bœuf de Charolles (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, France's application to register the name ‘Bœuf de Charolles’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, France's application to register the name ‘Bœuf de Charolles’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Bœuf de Charolles’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Bœuf de Charolles’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 July 2014.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 42, 13.2.2014, p. 16.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.1. Fresh meat (and offal)

FRANCE

Bœuf de Charolles (PDO)

---