alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Goldstein Affiliates, Inc., et al., Respondents, v Len Art Knitting Corp. et al., Defendants, and Aaron Gottlieb, Appellant.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered October 3, 1979, granting plaintiffs’ motion for a default judgment, reversed, on the law, on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, motion denied and cross motion to vacate the default granted on condition that appellant Gottlieb pay $150 costs to plaintiffs within 20 days after the service of the order entered herein. Upon appellant’s failure to meet this condition, order affirmed, with costs. Appellant’s time to serve an answer is extended until 10 days after payment of the aforesaid sum. Appellant Gottlieb served an affidavit in opposition to plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment. Although appellant never served a formal notice of cross motion, his affidavit apprised the plaintiffs of the fact that he was seeking (i) dismissal of the cause of action against him for legal insufficiency, or, (ii) a more definite statement of that cause. Implicitly, appellant’s affidavit requested that his default be vacated. Therefore, his affidavit will be treated on this appeal as a cross motion to vacate his default (cf. *Plateis v Flax,*54 AD2d 813). The disposition of controversies on the merits is favored and, in furtherance of that policy, a default will be vacated upon a proper showing of a meritorious defense, an excusable default, and the absence of willfulness *(Corley v East Aurora Metals,*55 AD2d 840). In his affidavit, appellant denies that the subject escrow fund was set aside solely for the benefit of the plaintiffs. Appellant further emphasizes that, even if the escrow fund was set aside for the plaintiffs, they did not establish their entitlement to it. Suffice it to say that the affidavits submitted by plaintiffs’ attorney do not clearly show that his clients are entitled to the escrow fund. Hence, appellant’s affidavit indicates that he may very well have a meritorious defense to this action. The excuse presented by appellant for his default is framed in very vague and evasive terms. Nonetheless, it is possible that his default was caused by the confusion surrounding his change of business address. Therefore, his default will be considered unintentional, and thus, excusable. As a condition for vacating the default, appellant will pay $150 costs to the plaintiffs for the inconvenience caused to them by this delay. Upon appellant’s failure to pay these costs, the order is affirmed. Appellant’s time to serve an answer is extended until 10 days after payment of those costs. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Birns, Sandler and Carro, JJ.
52.247-9 Agreed Weight-General Freight.       As prescribed in 47.207-4(a)(1), insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts for transportation or for transportation-related services when the shipping activity determines the weight of shipments of freight other than household goods or office furniture:          Agreed Weight-General Freight (Apr 1984)          The shipping activity shall determine the weight of each shipment. The weight shall be shown on the covering shipping document and shall be accepted by the Contractor as the agreed weight.          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.247 [Reserved]
47.301-3 Using the Defense Transportation

System (DTS).

(a) All military and civilian agencies shipping, or arranging for the acquisition and shipment by

Government contractors, through the use of military-controlled transport or through military

transshipment facilities shall follow Department of Defense (DoD) Regulation DoD 4500.9-R, Defense

Transportation Regulation Part II. This establishes uniform procedures and documents for the

generation, documentation, communication, and use of transportation information, thus providing

the capability for control of shipments moving in the DTS. DoD 4500.9-R, Defense Transportation

Regulation Part II has been implemented on a world-wide basis.

(b) Contracting activities are responsible for (1) ensuring that the requirements of the DoD 4500.9-

R, Defense Transportation Regulation Part II regulation are included in appropriate contracts for all

applicable shipments and (2) enforcing these requirements with regard to shipments under their

control. This includes requirements relating to documentation, marking, advance notification of

shipment dates, and terminal clearances.

(c) Contractual documents shall designate a contract administration office (see 42.202(a)) as the

contact point to which the contractor will provide necessary information to-

(1) Effect DoD 4500.9-R, Defense Transportation Regulation Part II documentation and movement

control, including air or water terminal shipment clearances; and

(2) Obtain data necessary for shipment marking and freight routing. Contractual documents shall

specify that the contractor shall not ship directly to a military air or water port terminal without

authorization from the designated contract administration office (see 47.305-6(f)).

Parent topic: 47.301 General.
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Report of Cadiscor Resources Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/SB/A1 for the period ending December 31, 2007, which contains the Companys financial statements audited for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), We, Michel Bouchard, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Pauline Comtois, CGA, a person performing similar functions than a Chief Financial Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,  that:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Michel Bouchard  __________________ Michel Bouchard President and Chief Executive Officer   /s/ Pauline Comtois, CGA  __________________ Pauline Comtois, CGA A person performing similar functions than a Chief Financial Officer for Cadiscor Resources Inc.   June 26, 2008
#### Everton Brewster, an Infant, by His Mother and Natural Guardian, Rhoda Brewster, et al., Appellants, v City of New York, Respondent.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered May 21, 1980, which denied their motion to increase the *ad damnum*clause of their complaint from $500,000 to $1,500,000. Order reversed, and plaintiffs’ motion granted, without costs or disbursements. Defendant is granted leave, if it be so advised, to conduct a further examination before trial and physical examination of the infant plaintiff solely with respect to the aggravation of his injuries as alleged in plaintiffs’ motion papers. Only about nine months elapsed between the onset of the infant plaintiff’s neurological condition, which plaintiffs contend was caused by the defendant’s negligence, and the making of the instant motion to increase the *ad damnum*clause. Plaintiffs’ attorney made the motion less than one month after he became aware of the onset of the condition, and the defendant has alleged no actual prejudice. Therefore, it was an abuse of discretion for Trial Term to have denied plaintiffs’ motion on the ground of "inordinate” delay. Mere lapse of time, unaccompanied by proof of actual prejudice to the defendant, is not a sufficient ground for denial of such a *668motion *(Calautti v National Transp. Co.,*10 AD2d 955). Hopkins, J. P., Titone, Margett and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENSACOLA DIVISION 

IN RE SKANSKA USA CIVIL 

SOUTHEAST INC. AND 

SKANSKA USA, INC. AS 

OWNERS OF THE BARGE KS 

5531, PRAYING FOR 

EXONERATION FROM OR 

LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 

ADMIRALTY RULE 9(H)

CIVIL ACTION NO.

3:20-CV-05980 

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 

LACEY COLLIER

MAG. JUDGE HOPE THAI 

CANNON

PARTIES’ JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF PROTECTIVE ORDER

Skanska USA Civil Southeast Inc. (“Skanska Southeast”) and Skanska USA,

Inc. (“Skanska USA”) (collectively “Skanska”) and Claimants represented by the 

undersigned counsel jointly move this Court for the entry of the proposed Protective 

Order applicable to this litigation.

As discussed during the Court’s May 26, 2021 Discovery Status Conference, 

the parties have reached agreement on the terms of a Protective Order applicable to 

this litigation with the exception of a single issue set forth below. To avoid delay, 

the parties seek the entry of proposed protective order attached as exhibit A. The 

parties will continue to meet and confer in an effort to reach agreement on potential 

obligations to log Producing Party/Counsel communications and applicable dates. 

Case 3:20-cv-05980-LC-HTC Document 1175 Filed 05/28/21 Page 1 of 3
2

WHEREFORE, Skanska USA Civil Southeast Inc. (“Skanska Southeast”) and 

Skanska USA, Inc. (“Skanska USA”) (collectively “Skanska”) and Claimants 

represented by the undersigned respectfully request the Court enter the attached 

proposed Protective Order in this litigation.

/s/ E. Samuel Geisler

E. SAMUEL GEISLER, FL Bar # 83817

BRYAN F. AYLSTOCK, FL Bar # 78263

Aylstock, Witkin, Kreis & Overholtz, PLLC

17 East Main Street, Second floor

Pensacola, Florida 32502

Office: (850) 202-1010

Fax: (850) 916-7449

sgeisler@awkolaw.com

baylstock@awkolaw.com

sallyteam@awkolaw.com

and 

/s/ Thomas F. Gonzalez 

THOMAS F. GONZALEZ, FL Bar #173878 

J. NIXON DANIEL, III, FL Bar # 228761

Beggs & Lane, RLLP

501 Commendencia Street 

Pensacola, Florida 32502

Office: (850) 432-2451

tfg@beggslane.com

jnd@beggslane.com

Case 3:20-cv-05980-LC-HTC Document 1175 Filed 05/28/21 Page 2 of 3
3

and

/s/ Brian H. Barr

BRIAN H. BARR, FL Bar 493041

EMMANUELLA J. PAULOS, FL Bar 99010

Levin Papantonio Rafferty Proctor 

Buchanan O’Brien Barr & Mougey, P.A.

316 S. Baylen Street, Suite 600

Pensacola, FL 32502

Office: (850) 435-7000

bbarr@levinlaw.com

epaulos@levinlaw.com

Attorneys for Claimants

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 28th day of May, 2021, I electronically 

filed the foregoing with the Clerk of Court by using the CM/ECF system which will 

send a notice of electronic filing to all attorneys of record. 

/s/ E. Samuel Geisler

Case 3:20-cv-05980-LC-HTC Document 1175 Filed 05/28/21 Page 3 of 3
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 18

- 00283

- CV

I N THE I NTEREST OF J.M. AND J.M.,

C HILDREN §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 323rd District

Court

of Tarrant County (323

- 104781

- 17)

December 6, 2018

Opinion by Justice Birdwell

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Wade Bi rdwell

Justice Wade Birdwell
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

WILLIAM SANDS,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:20cv5931/LAC/EMT

SANTA ROSA CORRECTIONAL 

INSTITUTION, 

Defendant.

/

ORDER

The chief magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on February 

23, 2021 (ECF No. 7). Plaintiff was furnished a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, 

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined it 

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 7) 

is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to 

comply with an order of the court.

Case 3:20-cv-05931-LC-EMT Document 8 Filed 03/25/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No.: 3:20cv5931/LAC/EMT

3. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this 

order and close the case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 25th day of March, 2021.

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-05931-LC-EMT Document 8 Filed 03/25/21 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 205-2 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3004 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3004

    To suspend temporarily the duty on Phosphor YOX, yttrium oxide 
                    phosphor, activated by europium.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 24, 2006

Mr. Reid (for Mr. Rockefeller) introduced the following bill; which was 
          read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on Phosphor YOX, yttrium oxide 
                    phosphor, activated by europium.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PHOSPHOR YOX, YTTRIUM OXIDE PHOSPHOR, ACTIVATED BY EUROPIUM.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.32.37      Phosphor YOX,       Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         yttrium oxide                                                      31/2009
                         phosphor,
                         activated by
                         europium
                         inorganic
                         products of a
                         kind used as
                         luminophores (CAS
                         No. 68585-82-0)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         3206.50.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### Maps Showing Geology, Oil and Gas Fields and Geologic Provinces of South Asia

By: Craig J. WandreyBen E. Law

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr97470C

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (3.04 MB pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Data Release:  **Geologic map of South Asia**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Introduction

First posted July 1, 1998

**For additional information, contact:**
Contact Pubs Warehouse

This digitally compiled map includes petroleum geology, geologic provinces, and oil and gas fields of South Asia. The map is part of a worldwide series released by the U. S. Geological Survey World Energy Project. The goal of the project is to assess the undiscovered, technically recoverable oil and gas resources of the world and report these results by the year 2000. For data management purposes the world was divided into eight energy regions corresponding approximately to the economic regions of the world as defined by the U.S. Department of State. South Asia (Region 8) is represented on this CD-ROM (see Reference Map), and includes Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka.

#### Suggested Citation

Wandrey, C.J. and Law, B.E, 1998, Maps showing geology, oil and gas fields and geologic provinces of South Asia: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 97-470-C, 10 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr97470C.

ISSN: 2331-1258 (online)

ISSN: 0196-1497 (print)

#### Study Area

#### Table of Contents

- Introduction
- References
- Geologic provinces in South Asia, sorted by province name
- Geologic provinces in South Asia, sorted by province code
- Map showing geologic provinces of South Asia
- Map showing geology, oil and gas fields and geologic provinces of South Asia

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation

Part 227 - PATENTS, DATA, AND COPYRIGHTS

Part 228 - BONDS AND INSURANCE

Part 229 - TAXES

Part 230 - COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

Part 231 - CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES

Part 232 - CONTRACT FINANCING

Part 233 - PROTESTS, DISPUTES, AND APPEALS

Parent topic: Subchapter E - GENERAL CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS
5646.706 Warranty Terms and Conditions.

Contracts containing a warranty clause will not be closed out before the warranty period has

expired.

HQ, United States Special Operations Command

Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L-K)

SOFARS 5646

February 2007

Parent topic: Subpart 5646.7 - WARRANTIES
Summary of Adopted and Approved Criteria in New Jersey that are as or More Stringent than the NTR 

Pollutant Aquatic Life Freshwater Aquatic Life Saltwater Human Health (10-6)

CMC (B1) CCC (B2) CMC 

(C1)

CCC (C2) W&O 

(D1) 

O only (D2) 

2. Arsenic NTR 360 190 69 36 

NJ 340 150 69 36

4. Cadmium

NTR 3.7 1.0 42 9.3 

NJ Hardness Hardness 40 8.8

5.a Chromium III

NTR 550 180 

NJ Hardness Hardness

5.b Chromium VI

NTR 15 10 1100 50 

NJ 15 10 1100 50 

6. Copper

NTR 17 11 

NJ Hardness Hardness

7. Lead

NTR 65 210 

NJ 38 210 

8. Mercury

NTR 2.1 1.8 

NJ 1.4 1.8

9. Nickel

NTR 1400 160 74 

NJ Hardness Hardness 64

10. Selenium

NTR 20 5.0 290 71 

NJ 20 5.0 290 71 

11. Silver

NTR 3.4 1.9

NJ Hardness 1.9

13. Zinc

NTR 110 100 90 81

NJ Hardness Hardness 90 81

23. Chlorodibromomethane

NTR 34 

NJ 13

87. Fluorene NTR 14000 

NJ 5300

89. Hexachlorbutadiene NTR 50 

NJ 18

119. PCBs NTR 0.00017 0.00017 

NJ 0.000064 0.000064
Page 1 of 1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Case No. DA 23 - 0106 CITY OF CUT BANK,

Plaintiff/Appellee ,

- vs CHAD MICHAEL LARSON,

Defendant/Appellant . **ORDER**

Upon consideration of

Appellant’s Second Motion fo r Extension of T ime Pursuant to Rule 26(1), M. R. App. P., and good cause appearing, **IT IS**  **HEREBY ORDERED**  that Appellant is granted an extension of

time up to and including May 17, 2023 within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s open ing brief on appeal. ELECTRONICALLY DATED AND SIGNED BELOW.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 12 2023

04/12/2023
Case Number: DA 23-0106
Case 3:06-cv-00645-MEF-TFM Document 16 Filed 02/12/2007 Page 1 of 1
### Summary of Adopted and Approved Criteria in New Jersey that are as or More Stringent than the NTR

Pollutant Aquatic Life Freshwater Aquatic Life Saltwater Human Health (10 - 6 ) CMC (B1) CCC (B2) CMC (C1) CCC (C2) W&O (D1) O only

(D2)

2. Arsenic NTR 360 190 69 36 NJ **340 150**  **69 36** 

4. Cadmium NTR 3.7 1.0 42 9.3 NJ **Hardness Hardness**  **40 8.8** 

5. a Chromium III NTR 550 180 NJ **Hardness Hardness** 

5.b Chromium VI NTR 15 10 1100 50 NJ **15 10**  **1100 50**  6. Copper NTR 17 11 NJ **Hardness Har**  **dness**

7. Lead NTR 65 210 NJ **38 210**  8. Mercury NTR 2.1 1.8 NJ **1.4 1.8** 

9. Nickel NTR 1400 160 74 NJ **Hardness Hardness**  **64**

10. Selenium NTR 20 5.0 290 71 NJ **20 5.0**  **290 71** 

11. Silver NTR 3.4 1.9

NJ **Hardness 1.9** 

13. Zinc NTR 110 100 90 81 NJ **Hardness Hardness**  **90 81** 

23. Chlorodibromom ethane NTR 34 NJ **13** 87. Fluorene NTR 14000 NJ **5300** 89. Hexachlorbutadiene NTR 50 NJ **18** 119. PCBs NTR 0.00017 0.00017 NJ **0.000 064**  **0.000064**
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-3073 FAE DRISCOLL,

Petitioner,

v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,

Respondent. Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board

in SF075270409-I-1. ON MOTION Before LINN, Circuit Judge. ORDER Fae Driscoll moves for reconsideration of the court's order dismissing her petition for review and for an extension of time to file her opening brief. Driscoll petitioned this court for review in December of 2008. Counsel for Driscoll attempted to submit documents to the court on behalf of Driscoll without having become a member of the bar of the court and without having properly entered an appearance. The court rejected the submissions and informed counsel that he must apply to become a member of the ,court's bar. After the deadline for filing a brief had passed, the court dismissed the petition for review on March 11, 2009, noting that counsel had not become a member of the court's bar.Counsel has now become a member of the court's bar. It appears that the

counsel's completed application arrived in the clerk's office in the afternoon after the dismissal order, which issued in the morning. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motions will be granted, the mandate will be recalled, the dismissal order will be vacated, and the petition for review will be reinstated, if Driscoll files her opening brief within 30 days of the date of filing of this order. FOR THE COURT 

### APR 13 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk COUgIttRIRALS FOR THE F CIRCUIT cc: Keith Goffney, Esq. Michelle A. Windmueller, Esq. APR 1 3 2009 s8 ktiv oUildHLY CLERK Date

2009-3073 - 2 -