alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Subpart 5137.1 - Service Contracts - General

**Parent topic:**Part 5137 - Service Contracting

## 5137.102-90 Policy.

Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 5000.74, Defense Acquisition Services, dated 5 January 2016, is the primary authority for service acquisitions.

## 5137.104 Personal services contracts.

(b)(i)  The head of the contracting activity (HCA) will make the determination as required by DFARS 237.104(b)(i) to authorize contracts pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 129b and 5 U.S.C. 3109.  See Appendix GG for further delegation.  When a blanket determination and findings (D&F) applies, the contracting officer will include in the contract file a copy of the blanket D&F and a statement signed by the contracting officer clearly showing why the blanket D&F is applicable to the proposed contract.      

 (ii)(C*)(2)* The HCA for the U.S. Army Medical Command must approve requirements for services at DFARS 237.104(b)(ii)(C)(*2*).  See Appendix GG for further delegation.

(iii)(A)(2)  The HCA will make the determination as required by DFARS 237.104(b)(iii) to authorize contracts pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 129b(d).  See Appendix GG for further delegation.

(S-90)  Contracting officers will ensure that purchase requests for personal services in the areas listed in DA Pamphlet 25-91 (Visual Information Procedures) have been approved by the local multimedia/visual information activity.  See Army Regulation 25-1.

## 5137.112 Government use of private sector temporaries.

Direct questions about acquisition of these services to the civilian personnel office.

## 5137.113-1 Waiver of cost allowability limitations.

(a)  The Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology) has authority to make the determination at FAR 37.113-1.  See Appendix GG for further delegation.

## 5137.170 Approval of contracts and task orders for services.

## 5137.170-2 Approval requirements.

(a)  *Acquisition of services through a contract or task order that is not performance based.*

(1) The HCA has authority to approve actions for the dollar threshold identified at DFARS 237.170-2(a)(1).  See Appendix GG for further delegation.

(2) The senior procurement executive has authority to approve actions for the dollar threshold identified at DFARS 237.170-2(a)(2). See Appendix GG for further delegation.
#### § 932.159 Reallocation of handler membership.

Pursuant to § 932.25, handler representation on the Committee is reallocated to provide that the two handlers who handled the largest and second largest total volume of olives during the crop year in which nominations are made and in the preceding crop year shall each be represented by four members and four alternate members.

[65 FR 62994, Oct. 20, 2000]
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

QINGZHEN WANG,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-70660

Agency No. A099-418-322

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 15, 2011** 

Before: CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Qingzhen Wang, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying her application for asylum and withholding

of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for

FILED

JUN 27 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-70660

substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, applying the standards

governing adverse credibility determinations created by the REAL ID Act,

Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039 (9th Cir. 2010), and we deny the petition

for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination

based on discrepancies between Wang’s testimony and her supporting

documentation regarding whether she continued to have contact with other church

members despite continuous police supervision, and where she was treated for her

alleged injuries. See id. at 1040-44 (adverse credibility determination was

reasonable under the REAL ID Act’s “totality of the circumstances”); Chebchoub

v. INS, 257 F.3d 1038, 1043 (9th Cir. 2001) (adverse credibility determination

supported in part based on inconsistencies relating to the events leading up to

petitioner’s departure). In the absence of credible testimony, Wang’s asylum and

withholding of removal claims fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156

(9th Cir. 2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3019 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3019

 To suspend temporarily the duty on phosphor-cool white small particle 
  calcium halophosphate phosphor activated by manganese and antimony.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 24, 2006

Mr. Reid (for Mr. Rockefeller) introduced the following bill; which was 
          read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on phosphor-cool white small particle 
  calcium halophosphate phosphor activated by manganese and antimony.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PHOSPHOR-COOL WHITE SMALL PARTICLE CALCIUM HALOPHOSPHATE 
              PHOSPHOR ACTIVATED BY MANGANESE AND ANTIMONY.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.32.08      Phosphor-cool       Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         white small                                                        31/2009
                         particle calcium
                         halophosphate
                         phosphor
                         activated by
                         manganese and
                         antimony
                         inorganic
                         products of a
                         kind used as
                         luminophores (CAS
                         No. 75535-31-8)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         3206.50.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

BUTCHIE LONG,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 85 EM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4th day of September, 2018, the Motion Requesting to Exceed 

Word Limit is DENIED. Petitioner is DIRECTED to file a compliant Petition for Allowance 

of Appeal within 30 days.
§ 905.31 Duties of Citrus Administrative Committee. It shall be the duty of the Citrus Administrative Committee: ( a ) To select a chairman from its membership, and to select such other officers and adopt such rules and regulations for the conduct of its business as it may deem advisable;
( b ) To keep minutes, books, and records which will clearly reflect all of its acts and transactions, which minutes, books, and records shall at all times be subject to the examination of the Secretary;
( c ) To act as intermediary between the Secretary and the producers and handlers;
( d ) To furnish the Secretary with such available information as he may request;
( e ) To appoint such employees as it may deem necessary and to determine the salaries and define the duties of such employees;
( f ) To cause its books to be audited by one or more certified or registered public accountants at least once for each fiscal period, and at such other times as it deems necessary or as the Secretary may request, and to file with the Secretary copies of all audit reports;
( g ) To prepare and publicly issue a monthly statement of financial operations of the committee;
( h ) To provide an adequate system for determining the total crop of each variety of fruit, and to make such determinations, including determinations by grade and size, as it may deem necessary, or as may be prescribed by the Secretary, in connection with the administration of this subpart;
( i ) To perform such duties in connection with the administration of section 32 of the act to amend the Agricultural Adjustment Act and for other purposes, Public Act No. 320, 74th Congress, as amended, as may from time to time be assigned to it by the Secretary;
[22 FR 10734, Dec. 27, 1957. Redesignated at 26 FR 12751, Dec. 30, 1961, as amended at 30 FR 13934, Nov. 4, 1965; 42 FR 59369, Nov. 17, 1977]
§ 786.113 Refunds; joint and several liability. ( a ) Excess payments, payments provided as the result of erroneous information provided by any person, or payments resulting from a failure to meet any requirement or condition for payment under the application or this part, must be refunded to FSA.
( b ) A refund required under this section is due with interest determined in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section and late payment charges as provided in 7 CFR part 792. Notwithstanding any other regulation, interest will be due from the date of the disbursement to the producer or other recipient of the funds.
( c ) Persons signing a dairy operation's application as having an interest in the operation will be jointly and severally liable for any refund and related charges found to be due under this section.
( d ) In the event FSA determines a participant owes a refund under this part, FSA will charge program interest from the date of disbursement of the erroneous payment. Such interest will accrue at the rate that the United States Department of the Treasury charges FSA for funds plus additional charges as deemed appropriate by the Administrator or provided for by regulation or statute.
( e ) The debt collection provisions of part 792 of this chapter applies to this part except as is otherwise provided in this part.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION R E c 

) 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION ) 

) 

Complainant, ) 

) 

OCT 1 5 20!5 

!i~,JG DOCKET 

V. ) 

) 

) 

FAA Case Nos. 2011NM060047 et al. 

FDMS Nos. FAA-2012-0872 et al. 

(consolidated) 

SKYWEST AIRLINES, INC. ) 

) 

Respondent. ) 

~----------------~----~> 

AGREED REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE RESPONDENT'S REPLY BRIEF 

Pursuant to 14 C.P.R. § 13.233(e)(l), Respondent SkyWest Airlines, Inc. ("SkyWest") 

respectfully requests an extension of time of 30 days to file its Reply to Complainant's Appeal 

Brief. In support of this request, SkyWest states as follows: 

1. On July 16, 2015, Administrative Law Judge (ALI) Richard C. Goodwin issued 

an Initial Decision in the above-captioned matter. 

2. On July 22,2015, Complainant filed a timely Notice of Appeal. 

3. Complainant filed its Appeal Brief on September 9, 2015. 

4. SkyWest's counsel has conferred with Complainant's counsel and the parties have 

agreed to extend the time period for the filing of Respondent's Reply to Complainant's Appeal 

Brief by 30 days, from October 19,2015 until November 18,2015. 

WHEREFORE, Respondent respectfully requests that the Decisionmaker grant Sky West 

a 30-day extension of time, or until November 18,2015, to file its Reply Brief. 
Dated: October 14,2015 Respectfully Submitted, 

Ger~h!ir Marc L. Warren 

Paul Alp 

CROWELL & MORING LLP 

I 001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20004 

Telephone: (202) 624-2500 

Facsimile: (202) 628-5116 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on this 141

h day of October, 2015 tbe original and two (2) copies of 

the foregoing Agreed Request for Extension of Time was sent via Federal Express, postage 

prepaid, to: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Avenue SW 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2W1000 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

I hereby certify that on this 141

h day of October, 2015, a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing Agreed Request for Extension of Time was sent via electronic mail and Federal 

Express, postage prepaid, to: 

Dated: October 14, 2015 

Casey E. Gardner, Esq. 

Enforcement Division, AGC-300 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

800 Independence Ave., SW 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Casey. Gardner@faa. go\[ 

Counsel for Complainant 

Paul Alp
#### § 58.640 Packaging.

The packaging of the semifrozen product shall be done by means which will in no way contaminate the container or the product. When single service containers and lids are used, they shall be of good construction and protect the finished product. Containers used for frozen products shall be stored and handled in a sanitary manner so as to protect them from dust and bacterial contamination.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2949 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2949

 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain footwear valued over $20 a 
             pair with coated or laminated textile fabrics.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 23, 2006

  Mr. Carper introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain footwear valued over $20 a 
             pair with coated or laminated textile fabrics.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN FOOTWEAR VALUED OVER $20 A PAIR WITH COATED OR 
              LAMINATED TEXTILE FABRICS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.64.02      Footwear, other     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         than men's or                                                      31/2009
                         women's, valued
                         over $20/pair
                         designed to be
                         worn over, or in
                         lieu of, other
                         footwear as a
                         protection
                         against water,
                         oil, grease or
                         chemicals or cold
                         or inclement
                         weather where
                         such protection
                         includes
                         protection
                         against water
                         that is imparted
                         by the use of a
                         coated or
                         laminated textile
                         fabric (except
                         footwear with
                         waterproof
                         injection molded
                         bottoms, i.e.
                         comprising a
                         complete outer
                         sole and all or
                         part of the
                         upper) (provided
                         in subheading
                         6402.91.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2013302EN.01001801.xml

| 13.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 302/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 302/18

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1131/2013

of 7 November 2013

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Poperingse hopscheuten/Poperingse hoppescheuten (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Belgium’s application to register the name ‘Poperingse hopscheuten’/‘Poperingse hoppescheuten’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Belgium’s application to register the name ‘Poperingse hopscheuten’/‘Poperingse hoppescheuten’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Poperingse hopscheuten’/‘Poperingse hoppescheuten’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Poperingse hopscheuten’/‘Poperingse hoppescheuten’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 November 2013.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 57, 27.2.2013, p. 6.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

BELGIUM

Poperingse hopscheuten/Poperingse hoppescheuten (PGI)

---
Exhibit 10.4


 


 


NBTY Retirement Benefits Policy


for Certain Eligible Members of the Board of Directors


 


1.               Eligibility:  The policy shall apply only to those members
of the Board who have served as members of the Board for at least 15 years and
who retire from the Board solely as a result of the Corporation’s mandatory
retirement age policy (the “Eligible Retiree”).


 


2.               Annual Benefits:  Each Eligible Retiree shall continue to
receive the annual retainer in effect for directors at the time of such
Eligible Retiree’s retirement from the Board, until the earlier to occur of the
following:  (x) the 10 year
anniversary of the date of such retirement and (y) such Eligible Retiree’s
death (such period, the “Retirement Period”).


 


3.               Annual Meetings:  During the Retirement Period, each Eligible
Retiree shall be invited to attend all of the Corporation’s Annual Shareholders’
Meetings.  All reasonable costs and
expenses incurred by such Eligible Retiree to attend such Annual Meetings shall
be borne by the Corporation.


 


4.               Board Meetings:  Each Eligible Retiree shall receive notice of
and be invited to attend, as an observer with no voting power, all meetings of
the Board of Directors, at such Eligible Retiree’s sole cost and expense.
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10
- 11
- 00328
- CR EX PARTE JERWOODY MO LER

From the 12th District Court Walker County, Texas Trial Court No. 25392

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant’s “application for writ of habeas corpus and motion to appeal judgm ent on motion to dismiss” was filed in this Court on August 25, 2011. Based on this document and the parties’ briefs, it appears that Appellant’s pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus (seeking bail reduction or release under Code of Criminal
Proc edure art. 17.151) was filed in the trial court on December 15, 2010. Appellant and the State assert that this pretrial application has not been ruled on by the trial court. It appears that Appellant seeks in part a writ of habeas corpus from this Court, but this Court does not have original habeas corpus jurisdiction in criminal law matters. Ex parte Price, 228 S.W.3d 885, 886 (Tex. App.

— Waco 2007, no pet.). Accordingly, Appellant’s claim for habeas corpus relief from this Court is dismissed for lack o fEx parte Moler Page 2

jurisdiction. Appellant alleges that his motion to dismiss was heard and denied on March 11, 2011, and the State asserts that it was denied on March 14, 2011 (according to the trial court’s docket sheet, which the State has provided us). We will trea t Appellant’s “application for writ of habeas corpus and motion to appeal judgment on motion to dismiss” in part as a notice of appeal of the trial court’s denial of Appellant’s motion to dismiss. This Court lacks jurisdiction of Appellant’s appeal of the trial court’s denial of Appellant’s motion to dismiss because the notice of appeal is untimely. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 26.2(a)(1) (providing that notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after day trial court enters an appealable order). Furthermore, this Court lacks jurisdiction of Appellant’s appeal of the trial court’s denial of Appellant’s motion to dismiss because this Court does not have jurisdiction of such an interlocutory appeal. See Abbott v. State , 271 S.W.3d 694 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (sta ndard for determining jurisdiction is not whether appeal is precluded by law, but whether appeal is authorized by law); Everett v. State, 91 S.W.3d 386, 386 (Tex. App.

— Waco 2002, no pet.) (stating that this court has jurisdiction over criminal appeals only when expressly granted by law). Accordingly, this cause, as both an original proceeding seeking a writ of habeas corpus in a criminal case and an interlocutory appeal, is dismissed in its entirety for lack of jurisdiction.

REX D. DAVIS JusticeEx parte Moler Page 3

Befor e Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Dismissed Opinion delivered and filed September 28, 2011 Do not publish [CR25]
5104.7304 Solicitation provisions and

contract clauses.

See AFARS PGI 5104.7304-1 for implementation guidance of Enhanced Security Protections for

Contractor Information Systems.

Parent topic: Subpart 5104.73 - Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber Incident

Reporting