alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
252.219-7009 Section 8(a) Direct Award.

As prescribed in 219.811-3 (1), use the following clause:

SECTION 8(a) DIRECT AWARD (OCT 2018)

(a) This contract is issued as a direct award between the contracting office and the 8(a) Contractor

pursuant to the Partnership Agreement between the Small Business Administration (SBA) and the

Department of Defense. Accordingly, the SBA, even if not identified in Section A of this contract, is

the prime contractor and retains responsibility for 8(a) certification, for 8(a) eligibility

determinations and related issues, and for providing counseling and assistance to the 8(a)

Contractor under the 8(a) Program. The cognizant SBA district office is:

________________________________________

________________________________________

________________________________________

________________________________________

[To be completed by the Contracting Officer at the time of award]

(b) The contracting office is responsible for administering the contract and for taking any action on

behalf of the Government under the terms and conditions of the contract; provided that the

contracting office shall give advance notice to the SBA before it issues a final notice terminating

performance, either in whole or in part, under the contract. The contracting office also shall

coordinate with the SBA prior to processing any novation agreement. The contracting office may

assign contract administration functions to a contract administration office.

(c) The 8(a) Contractor agrees that it will notify the Contracting Officer, simultaneous with its

notification to the SBA (as required by SBA’s 8(a) regulations at 13 CFR 124.515), when the owner

or owners upon whom 8(a) eligibility is based plan to relinquish ownership or control of the concern.

Consistent with section 407 of Public Law 100-656, transfer of ownership or control shall result in

termination of the contract for convenience, unless the SBA waives the requirement for termination

prior to the actual relinquishing of ownership and control.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 252.219 RESERVED
§ 58.929 Frequency of sampling for quality control. ( a ) *Composition.* Sampling and testing for composition shall be made on batches of product as often as is necessary to control composition. On continuous production runs, enough samples shall be taken throughout the run to adequately assure composition requirements.
( b ) *Other chemical analysis or physical analysis.* Such tests shall be performed as often as is necessary to assure compliance with standards, specifications or contract requirements.
( c ) *Weight or volume control.* Representative samples of the packaged products shall be checked during the filling operation to assure compliance with the stated net weight or volume on the container.
( d ) *Keeping quality and stability.* A minimum of one sample from each batch of product or one representative sample per hour from a continuous production run shall be taken. For continuous runs, samples shall be taken at the start, each hour, and at the end of the run. Samples should also be taken after resumption of processing following an interruption in continuous operation. Each sample shall be incubated at 90 °F to 100 °F for seven days.
Subpart 235.70 - Reserved           **Parent topic:** Part 235 - RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING
52.222-14 Disputes Concerning Labor Standards.       As prescribed in 22.407(a), insert the following clause:          Disputes Concerning Labor Standards (Feb 1988)          The United States Department of Labor has set forth in 29 CFR parts 5, 6, and 7 procedures for resolving disputes concerning labor standards requirements. Such disputes shall be resolved in accordance with those procedures and not the Disputes clause of this contract. Disputes within the meaning of this clause include disputes between the Contractor (or any of its subcontractors) and the contracting agency, the U.S. Department of Labor, or the employees or their representatives.          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.222 [Reserved]
**EXHIBIT 32**

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of MainStreet Financial Corporation (the "Company") that the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements included in such report.
| Date:  March 30, 2007 | By: | /s/ David L. HatfieldDavid L. HatfieldPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)                                                |
|---------------------------------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |     |                                                                                                                                                         |
| Date:  March 30, 2007 | By: | /s/ James R. ToburenJames R. ToburenSenior Vice President, Treasurer and  Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



# United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1462, -1463, -1464, -1465 TAURUS IP, LLC (now known as Manufacturing System Technologies, LLC),Plaintiff/Third Party DefendantAppellant, and ORION IP, LLC (now known as Clear With Computers LLC)

and ERICH SPANGENBERG,

Third Party Defendant-Appellants,

v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, CHRYSLER FINANCIAL, LLC, and

DAIMLERCHRYSLER COMPANY, LLC,

Defendants-Appellees, and CHRYSLER HOLDING, LLC,

Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee, and MERCEDES-BENZ USA, INC. and CHRYSLER LLC, Defendants/Third Party Plaintiffs-Cross Appellants. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin in case no. 07-CV-158, Chief Judge Barbara B. Crabb.2008-1474, -1477

TAURUS IP, LLC (now known as Manufacturing System Technologies, LLC), Defendant-Appellant,

v. HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA,

Defendant-Cross Appellant, and REEBOK INTERNATIONAL, LTD.,

Defendant, and POLO RALPH LAUREN CORP.,

Defendant, and MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin in case no. 07-CV-477, Chief Judge Barbara B. Crabb. ON MOTION Before MAYER, Circuit Judge. ORDER Chrysler, LLC, Mercedes-Benz USA, Inc., Michelin North America, Inc., and Hyundai Motor America respond to the court's May 19, 2009 order and request a stay of proceedings with regard to Chrysler pending disposition of Chrysler's bankruptcy proceedings but to continue proceedings with regard to all other parties. Taurus IP, 2008-1462 et al. 2LLC, Orion IP, LLC, and Erich Spangenberg also respond to the court's order and

request that the court stay all proceedings with regard to all parties pending bankruptcy proceedings. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The briefing schedule is stayed pending disposition of the bankruptcy proceedings as to all parties and proceedings. The parties are directed to notify the court within 14 days from the date of final disposition of the bankruptcy proceedings. FOR THE COURT 

### JUL 23 2009 Date

cc: Jon E. Wright, Esq. Elizabeth A. Wiley, Esq. Mitchell G. Stockwell, Esq. Gene C. Schaerr, Esq. Michael E. Jones, Esq. s19 Jan Horbaly Clerk 

## ID US. COURT FO L F APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
JUL 2 3 2009 JAN HORI3ALY CLERK /s/ Jan Horbalv

2008-1462 et al. 3
FLN (Rev. 3/2007) Deficiency Order Page 1 of 1

5:95cr5029LAC - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs. ELIAS RAYES MEJIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs

ELIAS RAYES MEJIA

Case No.5:95cr5029LAC

ORDER

Your document, MOTION TO ELIMINATE ENHANCEMENTS AND REDUCE

SENTENCE, was referred to the undersigned with the following deficiencies:

The document does not have a Certificate of Service as required by Rule

5(b) and (d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, showing proper

service.

For these reasons, IT IS ORDERED that the document shall remain in the electronic

file, but the court will not consider it until you have corrected the above deficiency by

filing notice of service.

DONE and ORDERED this 16th day of June, 2008.

s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:95-cr-05029-LC-GRJ Document 315 Filed 06/16/08 Page 1 of 1
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Conflict ResolutionElementary Secondary EducationProblem SolvingProgram EffectivenessProgram EvaluationStudent BehaviorTeacher Role

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
# L_2014052EN.01000301.xml

| 21.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 52/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 52/3

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 158/2014

of 13 February 2014

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Daujėnų naminė duona (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Lithuania’s application to register the name ‘Daujėnų naminė duona’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Lithuania’s application to register the name ‘Daujėnų naminė duona’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Daujėnų naminė duona’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Daujėnų naminė duona’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 February 2014.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Janusz LEWANDOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 251, 31.8.2013, p. 8.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products and foodstuffs listed in point I of Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012:

Class 2.4.   Bread, pastry, cakes, confectionery, biscuits and other baker’s wares

LITHUANIA

Daujėnų naminė duona (PGI)

---
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3097 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3097

   To suspend temporarily the duty on seals, aerodynamic, fireproof.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

 Mr. Brownback introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on seals, aerodynamic, fireproof.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SEALS, AERODYNAMIC, FIREPROOF.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.59.11        Seals, aerodynamic,     Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           fireproof (provided                                               31/2009          ''
                           for in subheading                                                                   .
                           5911.90.00)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# l ' 

### Lowry, Nick (OST) From: 

### Sent: To: 

### Cc: Subject:
Mr. Edelman and Mr. Silverberg, Lowry, Nick (OST) Monday, April 01, 2013 3:45 PM B. Edelman (bedelman@hbs.edu); Robert P. Silverberg (rsilverberg@sgbdc.com) Podberesky, Samuel (OST); Dols, Jonathan (OST); Alec Bramlett (alec.bramlett@aa.com) Joint Motion of March 26, 2013. Dkt. OST 2013-0024

By this e-mail, we are notifyingthe parties thatwe at the Office ofAviation Enforcement 

### & Proceedings grantyourjoint motion of March 26 providing for a second round of pleadings. The parties have agreed that Mr. Edelman will file his reply by April 5, 

### 2013, and thatAmerican's response will be filed by April19. I will place this e-mail in the docket. Regards,



### Nicholas Lovvry SeniorAttorney 0 llice ofAviation Enforcement& 

### Proceedings 01Tice ofthe General Counsel U.S. Dept. ofTransportation 202-.366-9a51 (ph) ;,. ;

',····

1
39–008

108TH CONGRESS REPORT " HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ! 2d Session 108–778

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF S. 2986, TO AMEND 

TITLE 31 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE TO INCREASE 

THE PUBLIC DEBT LIMIT 

NOVEMBER 17, 2004.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. REYNOLDS, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 856]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 856, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of S. 2986, to amend 

title 31 of the United States Code to increase the public debt limit, 

under a closed rule. The rule provides one hour of debate in the 

House equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 

minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means. 

The rule waives all points of order against consideration of the 

bill. Finally, the rule provides one motion to commit. 

COMMITTEE VOTES

Pursuant to clause 3(b) of House rule XIII the results of each 

record vote on an amendment or motion to report, together with 

the names of those voting for and against, are printed below: 

Rules Committee Record Vote No. 325

Date: November 17, 2004. 

Measure: S. 2986—To amend title 31 of the United States Code 

to increase the public debt limit. 

Motion by: Mr. Frost. 

Summary of motion: To make in order and provide the appropriate waivers for the amendment offered by Representative Stenholm of Texas which reinstates the pay as you go buget rules 

through 2009. 

2

Results: Defeated 4 to 7. 

Vote by Members: Diaz-Balart—Nay; Hastings (WA)—Nay; 

Myrick—Nay; Sessions—Nay; Reynolds—Nay; Putnam—Nay; 

Frost—Yea; Slaughter—Yea; McGovern—Yea; Hastings (FL)—Yea; 

Dreier—Nay.

Æ
215.403-3 Requiring data other than certified cost or pricing data.       Follow the procedures at PGI                 215.403-3             .          (a) In accordance with                    10 U.S.C. 3705                —             (1) Contracting officers shall not determine the price of a contract or subcontract to be fair and reasonable based solely on historical prices paid by the Government (see PGI 215.403-3 Requiring data other than certified cost or pricing data.(4)); and             (4) In lieu of the factors for consideration listed in FAR 15.403-3(a)(4), a determination by the head of the contracting activity (see PGI 215.403-3 Requiring data other than certified cost or pricing data.(7)) that it is in the best interest of the Government to make the award to an offeror that does not make a good faith effort to comply with a reasonable request to submit data other than certified cost or pricing data shall be based on consideration of pertinent factors, including the following:             (i) The effort to obtain the data.             (ii) Availability of other sources of supply of the item or service.             (iii) The urgency or criticality of the Government's need for the item or service.             (iv) Reasonableness of the price of the contract, subcontract, or modification of the contract or subcontract based on information available to the contracting officer.             (v) Rationale or justification made by the offeror for not providing the requested data.             (vi) Risk to the Government if award is not made.                    (c) *Commercial products or commercial services.* For determinations of price reasonableness of major weapon systems acquired as commercial products, see 234.7002(d)    **Parent topic:** 215.403 Obtaining certified cost or pricing data.
**Exhibit 31.2**

CERTIFICATION

I,William A. Owen, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to the quarterly report onForm 10-Q/A of Outdoor Channel Holdings, Inc.;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and otherfinancial information included in this report fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a)  All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: February 12, 2007 | /s/ William A.  Owen                      |   |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------------|--------|
|                    | WILLIAM A. OWEN,  Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
52.246-5 Inspection of Services-Cost-Reimbursement.       As prescribed in 46.305, insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts for services, or supplies that involve the furnishing of services, when a cost-reimbursement contract is contemplated:          Inspection of Services-Cost-Reimbursement (Apr 1984)                                       (a)                   *Definition.*"Services," as used in this clause, includes services performed, workmanship, and material furnished or used in performing services.                                          (b) 						            The Contractor shall provide and maintain an inspection system acceptable to the Government covering the services under this contract. Complete records of all inspection work performed by the Contractor shall be maintained and made available to the Government during contract performance and for as long afterwards as the contract requires.                                          (c) 						            The Government has the right to inspect and test all services called for by the contract, to the extent practicable at all places and times during the term of the contract. The Government shall perform inspections and tests in a manner that will not unduly delay the work.                                          (d) 						            If any of the services performed do not conform with contract requirements, the Government may require the Contractor to perform the services again in conformity with contract requirements, for no additional fee. When the defects in services cannot be corrected by reperformance, the Government may-                                                         (1) 								                Require the Contractor to take necessary action to ensure that future performance conforms to contract requirements; and                                                            (2) 								                Reduce any fee payable under the contract to reflect the reduced value of the services performed.                                                                             (e) 						            If the Contractor fails to promptly perform the services again or take the action necessary to ensure future performance in conformity with contract requirements, the Government may-                                                         (1) 								                By contract or otherwise, perform the services and reduce any fee payable by an amount that is equitable under the circumstances; or                                                            (2) 								                Terminate the contract for default.                                                                    (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.246 [Reserved]