alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2014363EN.01014901.xml

| 18.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 363/149 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 363/149

---

COUNCIL DECISION 2014/920/CFSP

of 15 December 2014

appointing the Chairman of the Military Committee of the European Union

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 240 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2001/79/CFSP of 22 January 2001 setting up the Military Committee of the European Union (1),

1

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 3(1) of Decision 2001/79/CFSP, the Chairman of the Military Committee of the European Union (‘the Military Committee’) shall be appointed by the Council on the recommendation of the Military Committee meeting at the level of the Chiefs of Defence. According to Article 3(2) of Decision 2001/79/CFSP, the term of office of the Chairman of the Military Committee is three years, unless the Council decides otherwise. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 3(1) of Decision 2001/79/CFSP, the Chairman of the Military Committee of the European Union (‘the Military Committee’) shall be appointed by the Council on the recommendation of the Military Committee meeting at the level of the Chiefs of Defence. According to Article 3(2) of Decision 2001/79/CFSP, the term of office of the Chairman of the Military Committee is three years, unless the Council decides otherwise.

| (2) | On 23 January 2012, the Council appointed General Patrick DE ROUSIERS as Chairman of the Military Committee for a period of three years from 6 November 2012 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 23 January 2012, the Council appointed General Patrick DE ROUSIERS as Chairman of the Military Committee for a period of three years from 6 November 2012 (2).

2

| (3) | At its meeting on 12-13 November 2014, the Military Committee meeting at the level of the Chiefs of Defence recommended that General Mikhail KOSTARAKOS be appointed Chairman of the Military Committee, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

At its meeting on 12-13 November 2014, the Military Committee meeting at the level of the Chiefs of Defence recommended that General Mikhail KOSTARAKOS be appointed Chairman of the Military Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

General Mikhail KOSTARAKOS is hereby appointed Chairman of the Military Committee of the European Union for a period of three years from 6 November 2015.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 15 December 2014.

For the Council

The President

F. MOGHERINI

---

(1)  OJ L 27, 30.1.2001, p. 4.

1

(2)  Council Decision 2012/34/CFSP of 23 January 2012 appointing the Chairman of the Military Committee of the European Union (OJ L 19, 24.1.2012, p. 21).

2

---
§ 718.304 Failure to fully comply. ( a ) When the failure of a participant to fully comply with the terms and conditions of a covered program precludes the providing of payments or benefits, relief may be authorized as specified in § 718.305 if the participant made a good faith effort to comply fully with the requirements of the covered program.
( b ) This section only applies to participants who are determined by FSA to have made a good faith effort to comply fully with the terms and conditions of the covered program and have performed substantial actions required for program eligibility.
[80 FR 41998, July 16, 2015]
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Neurotech  Development  Corportion.
(the Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending  September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Bernard Artz,  Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

/s/Bernard Artz

   Bernard Artz
   Chairman and Chief Financial Officer
   February 11, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 32 (Thursday, February 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7265-7266]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3065]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreement Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreement

[[Page 7266]]

under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit comments 
on the agreements to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, 
Washington, DC 20573, within ten days of the date this notice appears 
in the Federal Register. Copies of the agreements are available through 
the Commission's Web site (http://www.fmc.gov) or by contacting the 
Office of Agreements at (202) 523-5793 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8df9ffece9e8ece3ece1f4fee4fecdebe0eea3eae2fb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="106462717475717e717c6963796350767d733e777f66">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Agreement No.: 011426-047.
    Title: West Coast of South America Discussion Agreement.
    Parties: A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S; APL Co. Pte Ltd.; Compania Chilena 
de Navigacion Interoceanica, S.A.; Compania Sud Americana de Vapores, 
S.A.; Frontier Liner Services, Inc.; Hamburg-S[uuml]d; King Ocean 
Services Limited, Inc.; Mediterranean Shipping Company, SA; Seaboard 
Marine Ltd.; South Pacific Shipping Company, Ltd.; and Trinity Shipping 
Line.
    Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; Sher & Blackwell LLP; 1850 M 
Street, NW.; Suite 900; Washington, DC 20036.
    Synopsis: The amendment deletes the geographic sections of the 
Agreement, adds new authority for the parties to form committees, and 
restates the Agreement.

    Dated: February 12, 2010.

    By order of the Federal Maritime Commission.
Rachel E. Dickon,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-3065 Filed 2-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

CLEVELAND WILSON,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 3:21cv18-MCR-MJF

M.V. JOSEPH,

Respondent.

/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation dated May 9, 2021. ECF No. 5. The parties have been furnished 

a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity 

to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have 

made a de novo determination of all timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections 

thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should 

be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this Order.
2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Petitioner’s failure to 

comply with orders of this court. 

3. The clerk of the court shall close the case file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 29th day of June 2021.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 1:03-cv-00734-MEF-SRW Document 6 Filed 09/03/2003 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:03-cv-00734-MEF-SRW Document 6 Filed 09/03/2003 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 99.6




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Ur-Energy Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, W. William Boberg, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: March 18, 2011


/s/ W. William Boberg


W. William Boberg,


President and Chief Executive Officer
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]



# United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 01-2212 SANDRA C. DONATO, Plaintiff, Appellant,

v. SHEILAH F. MCCARTHY, Defendant, Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE [Hon. Steven J. McAuliffe, U.S. District Judge ]

Before Lynch, Circuit Judge , Campbell and Stahl, Senior Circuit Judges
.

Sandra C. Donato on brief pro se. R. Mat thew Cairns and Ransmeier & Spellman on brief for appellee.

March 5, 2002Per Curiam . Plaintiff Sandra C. Donato appeals a

judgment of the distr ict court granting summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee Sheilah F. McCarthy. We have reviewed the parties' briefs and the record below. Upon our review, we conclude that summary judgment was correctly granted. We a ffirm the district court judgment, essentially for the reasons stated in the district court's order dated July 17, 2001.

Appellee McCarthy did not submit a separately filed motion pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 38. Her request, recited in the final paragraph in her brief, that we direct Donato to pay attorney's fees and costs for filing a frivolous appeal is d enied
. "A party may not invoke Rule 38 by a reference in his brief." I n re I Don't Trust , 143 F.3d 1, 4 (1st Cir. 1998).

Affirmed
.
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-22 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 1 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-22 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 2 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-22 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 3 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-22 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 4 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-22 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 5 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-22 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 6 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-22 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 7 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-22 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 8 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-22 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 9 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-22 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 10 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-22 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 11 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-22 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 12 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-22 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 13 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-22 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 14 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-22 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 15 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-22 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 16 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-22 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 17 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-22 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 18 of 18
Editorial Note on Part 57
Editorial Note: 1. At 63 FR 69969, Dec. 17, 1998, part 57 was added by duplicating portions of part 59. At 63 FR 72353, Dec. 31, 1998, part 59 was redesignated as part 590 of 9 CFR. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 57 appear at 63 FR 69971, Dec. 17, 1998.

§ 57.45 Prohibition on eggs not intended for use as human food. ( a ) No person shall buy, sell, or transport, or offer to buy or sell, or offer or receive for transportation in commerce, any eggs that are not intended for use as human food, unless they are denatured or decharacterized, unless shipped under seal as authorized in § 57.720(a) and identified as required by the regulations in this part.
( b ) No person shall import or export shell eggs classified as loss, inedible, or incubator rejects unless they are denatured or decharacterized and identified as required by the regulations in this part.
[63 FR 69968, 69970, Dec. 17, 1998, as amended at 69 FR 57166, Sept. 24, 2004]
§ 780.11 Appeals of NRCS determinations. ( a ) Notwithstanding any other provision of this part, a determination of NRCS issued to a participant pursuant to Title XII of the Food Security Act of 1985, as amended, including a wetland determination, may be appealed to the county committee in accordance with the procedures in this part.
( b ) If the county committee hears the appeal and believes that the challenge to the NRCS determination is not frivolous, the county committee shall refer the case with its findings on other issues to the NRCS State Conservationist to review the determination, or may make such a referral in advance of resolving other issues.
( c ) A decision of the county committee not to refer the case with its findings to the NRCS State Conservationist may be appealed to the State Committee.
( d ) The county or State committee decision must incorporate, and be based upon, the results of the NRCS State Conservationist's review and subsequent determination.
237.172 Service contracts surveillance.

(a) Ensure that quality assurance surveillance plans are prepared in conjunction with the

preparation of the statement of work or statement of objectives for solicitations and contracts for

services. These plans should be tailored to address the performance risks inherent in the specific

contract type and the work effort addressed by the contract. (See FAR subpart 46.4.) Retain quality

assurance surveillance plans in the contract file. See http://sam.dau.mil, Step Four – Requirements

Definition, for examples of quality assurance surveillance plans.

(b) See PGI 216.505-70 for guidance regarding minimum labor category qualifications for orders

issued under multiple award services contracts.

Parent topic: Subpart 237.1 - SERVICE CONTRACTS—GENERAL
52.243 [Reserved]

52.243-1 Changes-Fixed-Price.

52.243-2 Changes-Cost-Reimbursement.

52.243-3 Changes-Time-and-Materials or Labor-Hours.

52.243-4 Changes.

52.243-5 Changes and Changed Conditions.

52.243-6 Change Order Accounting.

52.243-7 Notification of Changes.

Parent topic: Subpart 52.2 - Text of Provisions and Clauses
52.240 [Reserved]           **Parent topic:** Subpart 52.2 - Text of Provisions and Clauses
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

OMAR POWELL,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 617 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27th day of April, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
45.104 Responsibility and liability for Government property.       (a) 						            Generally, contractors are not held liable for loss of Government property under the following types of contracts:                                                         (1) 								                Cost-reimbursement contracts.                                                            (2) 								                Time-and-material contracts.                                                            (3) 								                Labor-hour contracts.                                                            (4) 								                Fixed-price contracts awarded on the basis of submission of certified cost or pricing data.                                                                             (b) 						            The contracting officer may revoke the Government’s assumption of risk when the property administrator determines that the contractor’s property management practices are noncompliant with contract requirements.                                          (c) 						            A prime contractor that provides Government property to a subcontractor shall not be relieved of any responsibility to the Government that the prime contractor may have under the terms of the prime contract.                                          (d) 						            With respect to loss of Government property, the contracting officer, in consultation with the property administrator, shall determine-                                                         (1) 								                The extent, if any, of contractor liability based upon the amount of damages corresponding to the associated property loss; and                                                            (2) 								                The appropriate form and method of Government recovery (may include repair, replacement, or other restitution).                                                                             (e) 						            Any monies received as financial restitution shall be credited to the Treasury of the United States as miscellaneous receipts, unless otherwise authorized by statute (31 U.S.C. 3302(b)).    **Parent topic:** Subpart 45.1 - General
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Report of Cadiscor Resources Inc. (the Company) on Form 10K/SBA1 for the period ending December 31, 2006, which contains the Companys financial statements audited for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Michel Bouchard, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Michel Bouchard __________________ Michel Bouchard President and Chief Executive Officer  November 28, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2936 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2936

       To suspend temporarily the duty on Pymetrozine technical.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 23, 2006

  Mr. Carper introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on Pymetrozine technical.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

 SECTION 1. PYMETROZINE TECHNICAL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.13.30      1,2,4-Triazin-      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         3(2H)-one, 4,5-                                                    31/2009
                         dihydro-6-methyl-
                         4-[(3-
                         pyridinylmethylen
                         e)amino]-
                         (Pymetrozine)
                         (CAS No. 123312-
                         89-0) (provided
                         for in subheading
                         2933.69.60)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
252.247-7027 Riding Gang Member

Requirements.

As prescribed in 247.574 (e), use the following clause:

RIDING GANG MEMBER REQUIREMENTS (MAY 2018)

(a) Definition. “Riding gang member,” as used in this clause, has the same definition as “riding gang

member” in title 46 U.S.C. 2101.

(b) Requirements relating to riding gang members. Notwithstanding 46 U.S.C. 8106, the Contractor

shall ensure each riding gang member holds a valid U.S. Merchant Mariner's Document issued

under 46 U.S.C. chapter 73, or a transportation security card issued under section 70105 of such

title.

(c) Exemption.

(1) An individual is exempt from the requirements of paragraph (b) of this clause and shall not be

treated as a riding gang member for the purposes of section 8106 of title 46, if that individual is on a

vessel for purposes other than engaging in the operation or maintenance of the vessel and is—

(i) One of the personnel who accompanies, supervises, guards, or maintains unit equipment aboard a

ship, commonly referred to as supercargo personnel;

(ii) One of the force protection personnel of the vessel;

(iii) A specialized repair technician; or

(iv) An individual who is otherwise required by the Secretary of Defense or designee to be aboard

the vessel.

(2) Any individual who is exempt under paragraph (c)(1) of this clause must pass a DoD background

check before going aboard the vessel.

(i) The Contractor shall—

(A) Render all necessary assistance to U.S. Armed Forces personnel with respect to the

identification and screening of exempted individuals. This will require, at a minimum, the Contractor

to submit the name and other biographical information necessary to the Government official

specified in the contract for the purposes of conducting a background check; and

(B) Deny access or immediately remove any individual(s) from the vessel deemed unsuitable for any

reason by the Government agency conducting the background checks. The Contractor agrees to

replace any such individual promptly and require such replacements to fully comply with all

screening requirements.

(ii) The head of the contracting activity may waive this requirement if the individual possesses a

valid U.S. Merchant Mariner's Document issued under 46 U.S.C., chapter 73, or a transportation

security card issued under section 70105 of such title.
(3) An individual exempted under paragraph (c)(1) of this clause is not treated as a riding gang

member and shall not be counted as an individual in addition to the crew for the purposes of 46

U.S.C. 3304.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 252.247 RESERVED
Case 4:20-cv-00514-MW-MAF Document 15-6 Filed 03/10/21 Page 1 of 2
Case 4:20-cv-00514-MW-MAF Document 15-6 Filed 03/10/21 Page 2 of 2