alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Jacob P. Finley et al., Appellants, *v.*Edwin G. Fay, Respondent.

(Argued June 5, 1884 :

decided June 27, 1884.)

The complaint in this action alleged in substance that the parties were originally partners ; that upon the dissolution of the partnership they had an accounting and settlement of the firm account, by which it was found that defendant was indebted to plaintiffs in the sum of $16,000, which sum plaintiffs sought to recover. The defendant set up an agreement executed on the dissolution, which he claimed was a release. By the agreement defendant assigned and transferred all his interest in the partnership assets to plaintiffs. In consideration whereof plaintiffs covenanted and agreed to save defendant harmless from the payment of any and all of the indebtedness of the late firm. Plaintiffs offered to prove by parol the accounting and settlement alleged in the complaint. This was objected to on the ground that the written agreement operated as a full settlement and release, and could not be varied by parol. The objection was sustained.

The court here say:

“ There is nothing in the language or effect of the written agreement set out in the answer which prohibits the plaintiffs from proving under their complaint, by parol, and recovering upon the cause of action alleged by them, to-wit: that at the time of the dissolution of the copartnership between the parties, there was a settlement of the firm accounts, by which it was found that there was due the plaintiffs from the defendant the sum of $16,000, which he promised and agreed to pay. “ The referee erred in holding that such proof could not be given or recovery had, and the judgment of the General Term *664and that entered upon the report of the referee should, therefore, be reversed, and a new trial granted, costs to abide event.”

*Frederick Collin*for appellants.

*'Seymour Dexter*for respondent.

*Per (Juriam.*

Mem. for reversal of judgments of General Term, and that entered on the report of the referee and for a new trial.

All concur, except Bugeb, Ch. J., and Milleb, J., dissenting.

Judgment reversed.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

JODIE A. MILLER, 

Plaintiff,

vs. 5:03cv318-LAC/WCS

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, 

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

__________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause is before the court upon Defendant’s status report, which advises that

a decision adverse to Plaintiff, denying her benefits, was reached by an administrative

law judge on September 12, ,2005, and the Plaintiff has filed exceptions to that decision

which the Appeals Council are considering. Doc. 21.

 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Defendant shall file a notice by February

21, 2006, advising the Court the status of the administrative proceedings on remand. 

DONE AND ORDERED on December 21, 2005.

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:03-cv-00318-LC-WCS Document 22 Filed 12/21/05 Page 1 of 1
EX-35 (b)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


March 12, 2007

Ace Securities Corporation
AMACAR GROUP
6525 Morrison Boulevard, Suite 318
Charlotte, NC 28211

RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for ACE Securities Corp. Home Equity
Loan Trust, Series  2006-HE4

Per Section 4.15a of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of 9/1/2006,
the undersigned Officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Master Servicer), hereby
certifies the following for the 2006 calendar year or portion thereof:

(A)  A review of such party's activities during the preceding calendar year or
portion thereof and of such party's performance under this Agreement, or such
other applicable agreement in the case of an Additional Servicer or Servicing
Function Participant, has been made under such officer's supervision.

(B)  To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such party
has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement, or such other
applicable agreement in the case of an Additional Servicer or Servicing
Function Participant, in all material respects throughout such year or portion
thereof, or, if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any
material respect, specifying each such failure known to such officer and the
nature and status thereof.

(C)  Notwithstanding anything herein to contrary (and noting that, to the
extent of any inconsistency, any and all other statements, certifications or
assertions herein are subject to the following): instances of noncompliance
related to the subject transaction for the applicable reporting period are
identified on Schedule A hereto.

Certified By:
/s/ Kristen Ann Cronin
Kristen Ann Cronin, Vice President

Certified By:
/s/ Gordon Johnson
Gordon Johnson, Assistant Secretary


(page)


Schedule A


Payment/Distribution Calculation Errors

During the reporting period, certain errors were made in connection with the
calculation of payments/distributions on the securities. To the best of the
signing officer's knowledge, each such error, which may or may not have been
material, has been identified and remedied and any related corrective action
has been disclosed in a report previously filed with the SEC in respect of the
reporting period.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3026 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3026

  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain camel hair not processed.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 24, 2006

Mr. Lieberman (for himself and Mr. Dodd) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain camel hair not processed.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN CAMEL HAIR NOT PROCESSED.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.12.24       Camel hair, not    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         processed in any                                                   31/2009
                         manner beyond the
                         degreased or
                         carbonized
                         condition
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         5102.19.20)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Henry Leary, Doing Business as Henry Leary Pump and Tank Company, Respondent, v. Local 1968, I.B.E.W.-A.F.L.-C.I.O., Appellant.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7503 (subd. [b]) to stay arbitration demanded by appellant, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated August 26,1969, which granted such stay. Order reversed, on the law, without costs, and proceeding remitted to Special Term (1) for trial of the issue as to whether there is a valid contract for the arbitration and (2) for such further proceedings as Special Term may direct, not inconsistent herewith. The findings of fact below have not been affirmed. The record establishes a triable issue of fact whether a valid contract exists pursuant to which appellant had the right to promulgate arbitration of the dispute referred to in its notice of intention to arbitrate (cf. *Matter of Settineri,*5 A D 2d 885; *Matter of Metro-Goldwyn Mayer Distr. Corp.*v. *Dewitt Development Corp.,*150 Misc. 408, affd. 242 App. Div. 674). If Special Term finds such valid contract exists, then the scope of the matters which might be arbitrated thereunder are to be decided by the arbitrator (cf. *Matter of Plein [Charchat],*17 A D 2d 25, affd. 12 N Y 2d 736; *Matter of Exercycle Corp. [Maratta],*9 N Y 2d 329; *Matter of Long Is. Lbr. Co. [Martin],*15 N Y 2d 380). Christ, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of THT Heat Transfer
Technology, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:

1.       The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

2.       Information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement
this 28th day of March 2011.

/s/ Jianjun
HeJianjun HeChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial
Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to THT Heat Transfer Technology, Inc. and will be retained
by THT Heat Transfer Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to §18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3103 

To suspend temporarily the duty on seals, outboard, trailing edge. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. BROWNBACK introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on seals, outboard, trailing 

edge. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SEALS, OUTBOARD, TRAILING EDGE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.59.11 Seals, outboard, trailing edge (provided 

for in subheading 5911.90.00) ................ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•S 3103 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 289 Referred in House (RFH)]

  1st Session
                                 S. 289

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 19, 2005

               Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To authorize an annual appropriation of $10,000,000 for mental health 
                    courts through fiscal year 2011.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 1001(a)(20) of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and 
Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3793(a)(20)) is amended by striking 
``fiscal years 2001 through 2004'' and inserting ``fiscal years 2006 
through 2011''.

            Passed the Senate April 18, 2005.

            Attest:

                                             EMILY J. REYNOLDS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
§ 789.12 Elements of a rated order. ( a ) Each rated order must include: ( 1 ) The appropriate priority rating (for example, DO-P1 for food and food resources processing and storage);
( 2 ) A required delivery date or dates. The words “immediately” or “as soon as possible” do not constitute a delivery date. Some purchase orders, such as a “requirements contract,” “basic ordering agreement,” “prime vendor contract,” or similar procurement document, bearing a priority rating may contain no specific delivery date or dates if it provides for the furnishing of items or services from time-to-time or within a stated period against specific purchase orders, such as calls, requisitions, and delivery orders. Specific purchase orders must specify a required delivery date or dates and are to be considered as rated as of the date of their receipt by the supplier and not as of the date of the original procurement document;
( 3 ) The written signature on a manually placed order, or the digital signature or name on an electronically placed order, of an individual authorized to sign rated orders for the person placing the order. The signature or use of the name certifies that the rated order is authorized under this part and that the requirements of this part are being followed; and
( 4 ) A statement as follows: ( i ) A statement that reads: This is a rated order certified for national defense use, and you are required to follow all the provisions of the Agriculture Priorities and Allocations System regulation in 7 CFR part 789.
( ii ) If the rated order is placed in support of emergency preparedness requirements and expedited action is necessary and appropriate to meet these requirements, the following sentences should be added following the statement specified in paragraph (a)(4)(i) of this section: This rated order is placed for the purpose of emergency preparedness. It must be accepted or rejected within six (6) hours after receipt of the order if the order is issued in response to a hazard that has occurred; or within the greater of twelve (12) hours or the time specified in the order, if the order is issued to prepare for an imminent hazard, in accordance with 7 CFR 789.13(e).
( b ) [Reserved]
# Subpart 5204.2 - CONTRACT DISTRIBUTION

**Parent topic:**Part 5204 - ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS

## 5204.270 Electronic Data Access.

### 5204.270-1 Policy.

   (b)(1) DON activities shall upload a copy of each manually executed procurement instrument (contract, purchase order, delivery order, modification, etc.), within six working days of execution, to the DoD Electronic Data Access (EDA).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

M IDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABA M A

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

 DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

 

August 2, 2006

NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT

RE: Stinnett Group, LLC v. Auto Owners Insurance

Civil Action No. 1:06cv00634-VPM

The above-styled case has been reassigned to District Judge W. Keith Watkins.

Please note that the case number is now 1:06cv00634-WKW. This new case

number should be used on all future correspondence and pleadings in this action.

Sincerely,

Sheryl K. Lent

Deputy Clerk

Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 4 Filed 08/02/2006 Page 1 of 1
EX-35 (c)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


March 12, 2007

Ace Securities Corporation
AMACAR GROUP
6525 Morrison Boulevard, Suite 318
Charlotte, NC 28211

RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for ACE Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan
    Trust, Series 2006-HE4

Per Section 4.15 a of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of 9/1/2006,
the undersigned Officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Securities Administrator),
hereby certifies the following for the 2006 calendar year or portion thereof:


(A)     A review of such party's activities during the preceding calendar year
        or portion thereof and of such party's performance under this Agreement,
        or such other applicable agreement in the case of an Additional Servicer
        or Servicing Function Participant, has been made under such officer's
        supervision.

(B)     To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such
        party has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement, or such
        other applicable agreement in the case of an Additional Servicer or
        Servicing Function Participant, in all material respects throughout such
        year or portion thereof, or, if there has been a failure to fulfill any
        such obligation in any material respect, specifying each such failure
        known to such officer and the nature and status thereof.

(C)     Notwithstanding anything herein to contrary (and noting that, to the
        extent of any inconsistency, any and all other statements,
        certifications or assertions herein are subject to the following):
        instances of noncompliance related to the subject transaction for the
        applicable reporting period are identified on Schedule A hereto.


Certified By:
/s/ Kristen Ann Cronin
Kristen Ann Cronin, Vice President

Certified By:
/s/ Gordon Johnson
Gordon Johnson, Assistant Secretary


(page)


Schedule A


Payment/Distribution Calculation Errors

During the reporting period, certain errors were made in connection with the
calculation of payments/distributions on the securities. To the best of the
signing officer's knowledge, each such error, which may or may not have been
material, has been identified and remedied and any related corrective action has
been disclosed in a report previously filed with the SEC in respect of the
reporting period.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Hillard Chubbs, Appellant, v. John T. Deegan, as Warden of Auburn Prison, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: In affirming the judgment we would point out that there was full compliance with section 1943 of the Penal Law on the original sentencing of relator as a multiple offender and no objection was raised by relator that a previous conviction was unconstitutionally obtained at that time, at resentencing, or in his petition herein. (Appeal from judgment of Cayuga County Court dismissing writ of habeas corpus.) Present — Goldman, P. J., Marsh, Witmer, Moule and Bastow, JJ.
# Fourt h Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

July 13, 2022

No. 04

- 21

- 00461

- CR

D’Andria BALDERRAMA

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR6542 Honorable Melisa C. Skinner

, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez , Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa , Justice Irene Rios, Justice

Appellant’s brief was first due on March 9, 2022. After this court’s granted Appellant’s
first

, second , third , and fourth motion s for extension s of time to file the brief, Appellant’s brief
was due on Ju ly 8

, 2022

. On that date, Appellant moved for an additional ten days to file the
brief.
Appellant’s motion is granted

. We order Appellant to file the brief on Ju ly 1 8 , 2022

. No further extensions of time to file Appellant’s brief will be granted. If Appellant fails to file the brief as ordered, we will abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court

to conduct a hearing and make appropriate findings and recommendations. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3).

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and aff ixed the seal of the said court on this 13th day of July, 2022

.

_________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz , Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000760382
<NAME> WELLESLEY III-C FDS 9/30/96
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          20,440
<SECURITIES>                                    40,675
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,677
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,977
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                70,815
<PP&E>                                         592,514
<DEPRECIATION>                                 429,218
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 234,111
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          132,745
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                    11,140,685
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                (11,039,319)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   234,111
<SALES>                                        155,765
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               298,464
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,327
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               156,149
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 8,163
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,165
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                120,660
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            120,660
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   120,660
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
From: Petrolati, Victor 

Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 11:24 AM 

Subject: Web Broadcast of DOE Public Meeting

Dear Battery Charger and External Power Supply Stakeholders: 

This email contains new information about registering for the Web broadcast of an 

upcoming public meeting. 

On September 12, 2008 at 9:00 AM, the U.S. Department of Energy will hold a public 

meeting in Washington, D.C. to discuss proposed amendments to the Department’s test 

procedures for battery chargers and external power supplies. In order to 

accommodate stakeholders that are unable to attend the public meeting, the Department 

will broadcast the meeting live over the Internet. The Web broadcast will allow 

stakeholders to listen in and view the slides of the presentations; however, stakeholders 

will not be able to submit comments or questions during the Web broadcast. In order 

to ask questions or make comments during the public meeting, stakeholders must attend 

the meeting in person. 

You must register in advance to access the broadcast. To register, follow this link: 

https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/667345048. Upon registering, you will receive a 

confirmation email that explains how to join the Webinar. You may listen to the 

meeting only by phoning in on the conference line number that is provided as part of 

the Webinar. 

 

We will try to provide meeting presentation slides on the DOE Web site prior to the 

meeting (these slides will be shown during the Web Broadcast). More information, 

including the proposal, the public meeting agenda, and a list of issues for stakeholder 

comment are already available. See 

http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/residential/battery_external_

2008_tp_standby_off.html 

Vic

 

Victor Petrolati

General Engineer

Office of Building Technologies (EE-2J)

Department of Energy

202-586-4549

victor.petrolati@ee.doe.gov

 EERE-2008-BT-TP-0004 COMMENT 11