alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 654.19 Plan of operation and maintenance. ( a ) The plan for O&M shall be incorporated into and made a part of the O&M agreement. A separate plan of O&M shall be prepared for each project measure that is expected to a have a unique O&M need. Two or more measures with similar O&M needs may be included in a single plan for O&M.
( b ) The plan of O&M shall include the known and anticipated items of O&M, an explanation of how the O&M activities may be carried out, a general time frame for making O&M inspections and for completing the needed O&M work, and the records and reports deemed appropriate by the sponsor(s) and NRCS.
# L_2015061EN.01002601.xml

| 5.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 61/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 61/26

---

Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 65/2014 of 1 October 2013 supplementing Directive 2010/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the energy labelling of domestic ovens and range hoods

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 29 of 31 January 2014
  )

On page 9, Annex II, the equation in point 2.1(i) should read as follows:

‘

  Formula

  ’

---
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### September 9, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r 

### 134816(28) Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, J ustices 

### Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 134816 COA: 277654 Wayne CC: 02-004819-02 RANDY LYNN TINCHER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for re consideration of this Court’s May 29, 2008 order is considered, and it is DENIED, beca use it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

d0828 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 9, 2008

Clerk
|                    |   |   |   |                                                                                                   |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: September 7, 2010 |   |   |   |  /s/ Thomas R. BurtonThomas R. BurtonPresident, Chief Executive Officer                           |
|                    |   |   |   |                                                                                                   |
|                    |   |   |   |                                                                                                   |
| Date: September 7, 2010 |   |   |   |  /s/ Robert A. MasseyRobert A. MasseySenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|                    |   |   |   |                                                                                                   |
#### § 701.42 Assignments.

Participants may assign ECP cost-share assistance payments, in whole or in part, according to part 1404 of this title.
201.402 Policy.       (1)  The Principal Director, Defense Pricing and Contracting (DPC), Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and Sustainment) (OUSD(A&S)DPC), is the approval authority within DoD for any individual or class deviation from—          (i)  FAR 3.104, Procurement Integrity, or DFARS                 203.104             , Procurement Integrity;          (ii) FAR Subpart 27.4, Rights in Data and Copyrights, or DFARS Subpart 227.4, Rights in Data and Copyrights;          (iii)  FAR Part 30, Cost Accounting Standards Administration, or DFARS Part 230, Cost Accounting Standards Administration;          (iv)  FAR Subpart 31.1, Applicability, or DFARS Subpart 231.1, Applicability (contract cost principles);          (v)  FAR Subpart 31.2, Contracts with Commercial Organizations, or DFARS Subpart 231.2, Contracts with Commercial Organizations; or          (vi)  FAR Part 32, Contract Financing (except Subparts 32.7 and 32.8 and the payment clauses prescribed by Subpart 32.1), or DFARS Part 232, Contract Financing (except Subparts 232.7 and 232.8).          (2) Submit requests for deviation approval through department/agency channels to the approval authority in paragraph (1) of this section, 201.403 , or 201.404 , as appropriate. Submit deviations that require OUSD(A&S)DPC approval through the Director of the DAR Council via email at osd.pentagon.ousd-a-s.mbx.dfars@mail.mil. At a minimum, each request must—          (i)  Identify the department/agency, and component if applicable, requesting the deviation;          (ii)  Identify the FAR or DFARS citation from which a deviation is needed, state what is required by that citation, and indicate whether an individual or class deviation is requested;          (iii)  Describe the deviation and indicate which of paragraphs (a) through (f) of FAR 1.401 best categorizes the deviation;          (iv)  State whether the deviation will have a significant effect beyond the internal operating procedures of the agency and/or a significant cost or administrative impact on contractors or offerors, and give reasons to support the statement;          (v)  State the period of time for which the deviation is required;          (vi)  State whether approval for the same deviation has been received previously, and if so, when;          (vii)  State whether the proposed deviation was published (see FAR Subpart 1.5 for publication requirements) in the Federal Register and provide analysis of comments;          (viii)  State whether the request for deviation has been reviewed by legal counsel, and if so, state results; and          (ix)  Give detailed rationale for the request.  State what problem or situation will be avoided, corrected, or improved if request is approved.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 201.4 - DEVIATIONS FROM THE FAR
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 16, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00644

- CV

UTILITY TRAILER SALES SOUTHEAST TEXAS, INC.

, Appellant

v.

Hector L. LOZANO and Mary E. Short,

Appellee s

From the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CVT003881 D3

Honorable Rebecca Ramirez Palomo, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant's motion for extension of time to file brief is hereby GRANTED. Time is

extended to December 5, 2016.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 16th day of November, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT #32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Outdoor Channel Holdings,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Perry T. Massie, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best
of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
         in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.

/s/ Perry T. Massie
-----------------------------

Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2003

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
     been provided to Outdoor Channel Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by
     Outdoor Channel Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
     Commission or its staff upon request.
Part 230 - COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

Subpart 230.2 - CAS PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS

230.201 Contract requirements.

230.201-5 Waiver.

Subpart 230.70 - Reserved

Subpart 230.71 - Reserved

Parent topic: Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation

Subpart 230.2 - CAS PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS

230.201 Contract requirements.

230.201-5 Waiver.

(a)(1)(A) The military departments and the Principal Director, Defense Pricing and Contracting

(DPC), Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and Sustainment)—

(1) May grant CAS waivers that meet the conditions in FAR 30.201-5(b)(1); and

(2) May grant CAS waivers that meet the conditions in FAR 30.201-5(b)(2), provided the cognizant

Federal agency official granting the waiver determines that—

(i) The property or services cannot reasonably be obtained under the contract, subcontract, or

modification, as applicable, without granting the waiver;

(ii) The price can be determined to be fair and reasonable without the application of the Cost

Accounting Standards; and

(iii) There are demonstrated benefits to granting the waiver.

(B) Follow the procedures at PGI 230.201-5 (a)(1) for submitting waiver requests to the Principal

Director, DPC.

(2) The military departments shall not delegate CAS waiver authority below the individual

responsible for issuing contracting policy for the department.

(e) By November 30th of each year, the military departments shall provide a report to the Office of

the Principal Director, DPC (Contract Policy) of all waivers granted under FAR 30.201-5(a), during

the previous fiscal year, for any contract, subcontract, or modification expected to have a value of

$15 million or more. See PGI 230.201-5 (e) for format and guidance for the report. The Principal

Director, DPC, will submit a consolidated report to the CAS Board and the congressional defense

committees.
Subpart 230.70 - Reserved

Subpart 230.71 - Reserved
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Authority:

7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 810.2201 Definition of wheat.

Grain that, before the removal of dockage, consists of 50 percent or more common wheat (*Triticum aestivum* L.), club wheat (*T. compactum* Host.), and durum wheat (*T. durum* Desf.) and not more than 10 percent of other grains for which standards have been established under the United States Grain Standards Act and that, after the removal of the dockage, contains 50 percent or more of whole kernels of one or more of these wheats.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Annualstatus report: a summary of aquatic vegetation monitoring at selected locationsin Pools 4, 8, 13, and 26 and La Grange Pool of the Upper Mississippi RiverSystem.**
 
1991 | 1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998
 
SuDoc Number:I 74.15/3:
Item Number:0671-L-02 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000556289
 
September 11, 2018
52.216-30 Time-and-Materials/Labor-Hour

Proposal Requirements—Other Than

Commercial Acquisition Without Adequate

Price Competition.

As prescribed in 16.601(f)(2), insert the following provision:

Time-and-Materials/Labor-Hour Proposal Requirements—Other Than Commercial Acquisition

Without Adequate Price Competition (Nov 2021)

(a) The Government contemplates award of a Time-and-Materials or Labor-Hour type of contract

resulting from this solicitation.

(b) The offeror must specify separate fixed hourly rates in its offer that include wages, overhead,

general and administrative expenses, and profit for each category of labor to be performed by-

(1) The offeror;

(2) Each subcontractor; and

(3) Each division, subsidiary, or affiliate of the offeror under a common control.

(c) Unless exempt under paragraph (d) of this provision, the fixed hourly rates for services

transferred between divisions, subsidiaries, or affiliates of the offeror under a common control-

(1) Shall not include profit for the transferring organization; but

(2) May include profit for the prime Contractor.

(d) The fixed hourly rates for services that meet the definition of “commercial service” at Federal

Acquisition Regulation 2.101 that are transferred between divisions, subsidiaries, or affiliates of the

offeror under a common control may be the established catalog or market rate when it is the

established practice of the transferring organization to price interorganizational transfers at other

than cost for commercial work of the offeror or any division, subsidiary or affiliate of the offeror

under a common control.

(End of provision)

Parent topic: 52.216 [Reserved]
1 £LI 575 7i(cT c'iT

,U,1?I2/

5ftX2'- ak-' - .- iv.

'IIIb 

2 -Ci/- 667 ,nF

(Z fi'3r )L ç , E' ,

70 Lq7y

/A/W 7it s C€p /b S C /emøi) 1' 19?td

,4,,njeI If 5'1 i1) 'ei 4-,4-r

W j 7 /2e cecA &o ' s /1,; eJ

1

c 77i (ta)

7112 sA e'5;

15 r

I/ /L / 4,-i /

7€i )e ' jk c 4 , 7)J do) J4 iMo

77, 7' Cmp/'r A, s fy

gç,oec7'4u7 c#9

4l

Case 2:06-cv-00669-MEF-SRW Document 17 Filed 04/25/2008 Page 1 of 2
s-n--

j7c) ?/nJc1:i A

O9

-' A r--- I I I v -

I V I- / -4.--"

- - i..--

- V

4v

(er

11A- 1i72 SM7 5 p"7L/r

/?? 7/7

C ,9;

y/

t

Case 2:06-cv-00669-MEF-SRW Document 17 Filed 04/25/2008 Page 2 of 2
#### § 7.27 Political activity.

Permitted and prohibited political activities, with respect to any State committee member, county committee member, county executive director, or any other county employee, will be determined in accordance with applicable policies specified in FSA handbooks and directives.
#### Manuel Gualtar GASPAR-CORREIA, a.k.a. Manuel Walter Correia, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-75370.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*408Submitted on July 28, 2007.*

Filed July 27, 2007.

See also 131 Fed.Appx. 561.

Manuel Gualtar Gaspar-Correia, Santa Clara, CA, pro se.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, San Francisco, CA, District Counsel, Office of the District Chief Counsel, Phoenix, AZ, Richard M. Evans, Esq., Nancy E. Friedman, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, HAWKINS and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision denying petitioner’s motion to reopen removal proceedings.

Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. *See United States v. Hooton,*693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). The regulations provide that a motion to reopen must be filed with the BIA within ninety days after the date on which the final administrative decision was rendered. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2). Here, the motion to reopen was filed over two years late. Therefore, the BIA did not abuse its discretion when it denied petitioner’s untimely motion to reopen. *See Lara-Torres v.*Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 968, 972 (9th Cir.2004), *amended by*404 F.3d 1105 (9th Cir.2005) (holding that BIA denials of motions to reopen or reconsider are reviewed for abuse of discretion); *see also Hughes v. Ashcroft,*255 F.3d 752, 759-60 (9th Cir.2001) (holding that the Child Citizenship Act of 2000 does not apply retroactively to lawful permanent residents who were older than eighteen years old at the time of the Act’s effective date).

Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.

All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### § 905.7 Handler.

*Handler* is synonymous with *shipper* and means any person (except a common or contract carrier transporting fruit for another person) who, as owner, agent, or otherwise, handles fruit in fresh form, or causes fruit to be handled. Each handler shall be registered with the Committee pursuant to rules recommended by the Committee and approved by the Secretary.

[81 FR 10454, Mar. 1, 2016]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2840 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2840

       To suspend temporarily the duty on certain welt footwear.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 18, 2006

 Mr. Brownback introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on certain welt footwear.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN WELT FOOTWEAR.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.13.90      Welt footwear with  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         outer soles of                                                     31/2009
                         rubber, plastics,
                         leather or
                         composition
                         leather and
                         uppers of
                         pigskin,
                         incorporating a
                         protective metal
                         toe-cap (provided
                         for in subheading
                         6403.40.30)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

SCOTT ALAN KLINE,

FDOC Inmate #J00703,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:20cv5942/LAC/EMT

C. MAIORANA, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

ORDER

The chief magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on May 26, 

2021 (ECF No. 8). Plaintiff was furnished a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, 

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined it 

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 8) 

is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as malicious, 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), 1915A(b)(1).
Page 2 of 2

Case No.: 3:20cv5942/LAC/EMT

3. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this 

order and close this case.

4. Plaintiff’s attempt to voluntary dismiss this case (ECF No. 9) is 

DENIED as untimely.

DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of July, 2021.

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
---

---

Exhibit 13.1

# CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF
SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF
                                     TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of RRsat Global
Communications Network Ltd., a company organized under the laws of the State of Israel
(the Company), does hereby certify that, to his knowledge:

| | 1. | the
Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the                Form
20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of                Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | the
information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date: March 24, 2008 |  | By: /s/ David Rivel
David RivelChief Executive Officer
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

CLARENCE WATERS, #132116, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO.2:06-CV-650-MEF

)

KENNETH L. JONES, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

ORDER

Upon review of the file in this case, and for good cause, it is 

ORDERED that on or before March 12, 2008 the respondents shall file a supplement to their

most recent answer which contains copies of the certified prior convictions on which the court relied

for purposes of enhancing his sentence under the Habitual Felony Offender Act. .

Done this 7th day of March, 2008.

 /s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00650-MEF-SRW Document 33 Filed 03/07/2008 Page 1 of 1
#### § 917.103 Terms.

All other terms used in this subpart shall have the same meaning as when used in the marketing agreement and order.

[18 FR 712, Feb. 4, 1953. Redesignated at 26 FR 12751, Dec. 30, 1961]

###### Effective Date Note

#### Effective Date Note:

At 76 FR 66605, Oct. 27, 2011, § 917.103 was suspended indefinitely, effective Oct. 28, 2011.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO.: 4:03cr16-SPM

HERNANDEZ LOPAZ DANIELS,

Defendant.

______________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s report

and recommendation dated April 30, 2007 (doc. 109). Defendant has been

furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an

extension of time to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code,

Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the report

and recommendation, I have determined that the report and recommendation

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 109) is

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Defendant’s § 2255 motion (doc. 98) is denied as untimely. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 15th day of June, 2007.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 4:03-cr-00016-RS-WCS Document 112 Filed 06/15/07 Page 1 of 1