alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31(ii)
                               --------------


                               CERTIFICATIONS

      I, Steve Bailey, certify that:


      1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
            10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
            report on Form 10-K of Alternative Loan Trust 2006-J6 (the
            "Exchange Act periodic reports");

      2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as
            a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
            omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
            made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
            were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
            this report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
            information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
            covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
            reports;

      4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
            servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance review(s)
            conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement(s)
            required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and
            except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the
            servicer(s) have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing
            agreement(s) in all material respects; and

      5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
            criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
            reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
            asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
            accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
            13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
            except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
            instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
            disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
      information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The
      Bank of New York, as Trustee and SunTrust Mortgage Incorporated.

Date: March 27, 2007


      /s/ Steve Bailey
      -----------------------------
      Steve Bailey
      Senior Managing Director, Loan Administration
52.249-7 Termination (Fixed-Price Architect-Engineer).       As prescribed in 49.503(b), insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts for architect-engineer services when a fixed-price contract is contemplated:          Termination (Fixed-Price Architect-Engineer) (Apr 1984)                                       (a) 						            The Government may terminate this contract in whole or, from time to time, in part, for the Government’s convenience or because of the failure of the Contractor to fulfill the contract obligations. The Contracting Officer shall terminate by delivering to the Contractor a Notice of Termination specifying the nature, extent, and effective date of the termination. Upon receipt of the notice, the Contractor shall-                                                         (1) 								                Immediately discontinue all services affected (unless the notice directs otherwise); and                                                            (2) 								                Deliver to the Contracting Officer all data, drawings, specifications, reports, estimates, summaries, and other information and materials accumulated in performing this contract, whether completed or in process.                                                                             (b) 						            If the termination is for the convenience of the Government, the Contracting Officer shall make an equitable adjustment in the contract price but shall allow no anticipated profit on unperformed services.                                          (c) 						            If the termination is for failure of the Contractor to fulfill the contract obligations, the Government may complete the work by contract or otherwise and the Contractor shall be liable for any additional cost incurred by the Government.                                          (d) 						            If, after termination for failure to fulfill contract obligations, it is determined that the Contractor had not failed, the rights and obligations of the parties shall be the same as if the termination had been issued for the convenience of the Government.                                          (e) 						            The rights and remedies of the Government provided in this clause are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this contract.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.249 [Reserved]
###### Editorial Note on Part 762

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 762 appear at 72 FR 63297, Nov. 8, 2007.

#### § 762.102 Abbreviations and definitions.

Abbreviations and definitions for terms used in this part are provided in § 761.2 of this chapter.

[72 FR 63297, Nov. 8, 2007]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board

# Time and Date: 

10 a.m. (Eastern Time); December 13, 2010.

# Place: 

4th Floor Conference Room, 1250 H Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005.

# Status: 

Open to the public.

## Matters To Be Considered

1. Approval of the minutes of the November 16, 2010 Board member meeting.

2. Thrift Savings Plan activity report by the Executive Director.

a. Monthly Participant Activity Report.

b. Monthly Investment Performance Report.

c. Legislative Report.

# Contact Person for More Information:

Thomas J. Trabucco, Director, Office of  External Affairs, (202) 942-1640. 

Dated: December 6, 2010.

Thomas K. Emswiler,

Secretary, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-30969 Filed 12-6-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6760-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

###### Sunshine Act Meeting

# STATUS:

Closed meeting.

# PLACE:

100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC.

# DATE AND TIME OF PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED MEETING:

Thursday, December 9, 2010 at 2 p.m.

# CHANGE IN THE MEETING:

Time change.

The closed meeting scheduled for Thursday, December 9, 2010 at 2 p.m. has been changed to Thursday, December 9, 2010 at 1 p.m.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: December 2, 2010.

Florence E. Harmon,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-30731 Filed 12-3-10; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
§ 786.105 Proof of production. ( a ) Evidence of production is required to establish the commercial marketing and production history of the dairy operation so that dairy production losses can be computed in accordance with § 786.106.
( b ) A dairy producer must, based on the instructions issued by the Deputy Administrator, provide adequate proof of the dairy operation's commercial production, including any dairy herd inventory records available for the operation, for the years of the base period (2003 and 2004 calendar years) and disaster claim period that corresponds with the issuance date of the applicable natural disaster declaration. ( 1 ) A producer must certify and provide such proof as requested that losses for which compensation is claimed were related to the disaster declaration issued and occurred in an eligible county during the eligible claim period.
( 2 ) A producer must certify to the average number of cows in the dairy herd during the base period and applicable disaster claim period when there is insufficient documentation available for verification.
( 3 ) Additional supporting documentation may be requested by FSA as necessary to verify production losses to the satisfaction of FSA.
( c ) Adequate proof of production history of the dairy operation under paragraph (b) of this section must be based on milk marketing statements obtained from the dairy operation's milk handler or marketing cooperative. Supporting documents may include, but are not limited to: Tank records, milk handler records, daily milk marketings, copies of any payments received from other sources for production losses, or any other documents available to confirm or adjust the production history losses incurred by the dairy operation. All information provided is subject to verification, spot check, and audit by FSA.
( d ) As specified in § 786.106, loss calculations will be based on comparing the expected base annual production consistent with this part and the actual production during the applicable disaster claim year. Such calculations are subject to adjustments as may be appropriate such as a correction for losses not due to the disaster. If adequate proof of normally marketed production and any other production for relevant periods is not presented to the satisfaction of FSA, the request for benefits will be rejected. Special adjustments for new producers may be made as determined necessary by the Administrator.
252.225-7004 Report of Intended

Performance Outside the United States and

Canada—Submission after Award.

As prescribed in 225.7204 (b), use the following clause:

REPORT OF INTENDED PERFORMANCE OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES AND

CANADA—SUBMISSION AFTER AWARD ( OCT 2020 )

(a) Definition. “United States,” as used in this clause, means the 50 States, the District of Columbia,

and outlying areas.

(b) Reporting requirement. The Contractor shall submit a report in accordance with this clause, if

the Contractor or a first-tier subcontractor will perform any part of this contract outside the United

States and Canada that—

(1) Exceeds the threshold specified in Defense Acquisition Regulation Supplement 225.7201 (a); and

(2) Could be performed inside the United States or Canada.

(c) Submission of reports. The Contractor—

(1) Shall submit a report as soon as practical after the information is known;

(2) To the maximum extent practicable, shall submit a report regarding a first-tier subcontractor at

least 30 days before award of the subcontract;

(3) Need not resubmit information submitted with its offer, unless the information changes;

(4) Shall submit all reports to the Contracting Officer; and

(5) Shall submit a copy of each report to: Principal Director, Defense Pricing and Contracting

(Contract Policy), OUSD(A&S) DPC/CP , Washington, DC 20301-3060.

(d) Report format. The Contractor—

(1) Shall submit reports using—

(i) DD Form 2139, Report of Contract Performance Outside the United States; or

(ii) A computer-generated report that contains all information required by DD Form 2139; and

(2) May obtain copies of DD Form 2139 from the Contracting Officer or via the Internet at

https://www.esd.whs.mil/Directives/forms/ .

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 252.225 RESERVED
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 1:03-cr-00062-MP-AK

TOMMY LEE WRIGHT,

Defendant.

___________________________/

O R D E R 

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 3, Motion for Termination of Supervised Release,

filed by Tommy Lee Wright. Under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e), a court can terminate a term of

supervised release and discharge the defendant at any time after the expiration of one year of

supervised release, "if it is satisfied that such action is warranted by the conduct of the defendant

released and the interest of justice." After consulting with the probation department, the Court

finds that such action in not warranted by the conduct of the defendant in this case. Accordingly,

the motion for termination (doc. 3) is denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 7th day of September, 2005

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:03-cr-00062-MP-AK Document 4 Filed 09/07/05 Page 1 of 1
40.

4

The Department of Transportation requires that the maximum weight limit for
4 tractor and trailer shall not exceed 80,000 pounds, The average weight of an
empty tractor and trailer is about 30,000 pounds, When cattle was transported
to different feed yards or to buyers, the transport companies could only haul
loads of cattle that weighed 50,000 pounds or less. The example below is
from a booklet published by the Department of Transportation.

|
| eee |
1

I ‘WAXIMOM WEIGHT ALLOWED IS 00.00 POUNDS

It was Ron Shepard's responsibility to make arrangements for transportation when
cattle needed to be moved. Shepard held a commercial license so he was aware

of the weight limitations, Sometimes he had to ship a load of cattle in more then
one trip for this reason. Richard Hall also hoids a commercial license and operated
a trucking company. Hall was also aware of the reason loads were sometimes
broken up into more then one shipment.

Page 8 of 41
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Julie M. DeMatteo, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of UBS Managed Futures LLC
(Aspect Series);

      2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

      4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

      5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: March 27, 2007

By /s/ JULIE M. DEMATTEO
   ----------------------
Julie M. DeMatteo
President and Chief Executive Officer
UBS Managed Fund Services, Inc.,
the Registrant's Sponsor
#### New York and Presbyterian Hospital, as Assignee of Richard Udland, et al., Appellants, v Allstate Insurance Company, Respondent.

[814 NYS2d 687]

In an action to recover no-fault medical payments, the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brandveen, J.), dated February 7, 2005, as denied that branch of their motion which was for summary judgment on their second cause of action to recover payments for medical services rendered by the plaintiff New York and Presbyterian Hospital, as assignee of Cindy Gar one. Justice Crane has been substituted for former Justice Cozier *(see*22 NYCRR 670.1 [c]).

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiffs, as the proponent of the summary judgment motion, had the initial burden of showing their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting evidentiary proof that the prescribed statutory billing forms were mailed and received, and that payment of no-fault benefits was overdue *(see Nyack Hosp. v Metropolitan Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co.,*16 AD3d 564 [2005]). The plaintiffs failed to submit a proper affidavit of service to establish as a matter of law that the subject hospital bill was mailed and received by the defendant.

Generally, “proof that an item was properly mailed gives rise to a rebuttable presumption that the item was received by the addressee” *(Matter of Rodriguez v Wing,*251 AD2d 335, 336 [1998] [internal quotation marks omitted]). “The presumption may be created by either proof of actual mailing or proof of a standard office practice or procedure designed to ensure that items are properly addressed and mailed” *(Residential Holding Corp. v Scottsdale Ins. Co.,*286 AD2d 679, 680 [2001]). Here, no presumption of mailing was created because the affidavit of the plaintiffs’ billing service representative did not state that he actually mailed the particular claim alleged in the second cause of action to the defendant Allstate Insurance Company (hereinafter Allstate) or describe his office’s practice and procedure for *548mailing no-fault claims to insurers *(see Hospital for Joint Diseases v Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.,*284 AD2d 374, 375 [2001]).

Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contentions, the certified mail receipt and the United States Postal Service “Track and Confirm” printout do not prove that the particular claim alleged in the second cause of action was actually received where, as here, there is no evidence that this claim was mailed to Allstate under that certified mail receipt number and no signed certified mail return receipt card has been produced *(cf. Matter of State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. [Kankam],*3 AD3d 418, 419 [2004]). The plaintiffs’ submissions were insufficient to raise a presumption that Allstate received the claim *(see Nassau Ins. Co. v Murray,*46 NY2d 828 [1978]).

Accordingly, it is unnecessary to consider the sufficiency of Allstate’s papers in opposition *(see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,*64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]; *Mariaca-Olmos v Mizrhy,*226 AD2d 437, 438 [1996]). Schmidt, J.P., Crane, Rivera and Fisher, JJ., concur.
§ 769.111 Loan approval and obligating funds. ( a ) Loan requests will be processed based on the date the Agency receives the application. Loan approval is subject to the availability of funds.
( b ) The loan will be considered approved for the intermediary lender on the date the signed copy of the obligation of funds document is mailed to the intermediary lender.
## Martin , Michae l (OST ) From : Mildre d Bennett[mbennett®mfx.net ] , I'iSPORTATiO N Sent : Friday , January27 , 201 2 8:0 1 A M r' f5 OPCpATiON: ^ To : EA S (OST ) Subject : PQ I ai rservic e „ , ,, , , ,,,, . ^-j Goo d Morning , I a m veryintereste d i n th e servic e provide d i n Presqu e Isl e Maine . W e nee d t o hav e affordabl e servic e o n aplan e larg e enoug h t o provid e agoo d rid e an d simpl e service s includin g ares t room , beverag e an d muffin . W e nee d 3 o rmor e flight s ada yt o accommodat e ou rschedules . I twoul d b e nic e i fal l th e delay s w e hav e i n Bosto n coul d b e shortened . I lov e t o travel . Loga n i s alway s th e wors tpar tof th e trip . Than k you , Mildre d Bennet t
Subpart 208.7 - ACQUISITION FROM NONPROFIT AGENCIES EMPLOYING PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED    **Parent topic:** Part 208 - REQUIRED SOURCES OF SUPPLIES AND SERVICES208.705 Procedures.       See DoD Class Deviation2013-O0018, Past Performance Evaluation Thresholds and Reporting Requirements, issued on September 24, 2013. This class deviation requires past performance reporting for contracts awarded under FAR subpart 8.7, Acquisition from Nonprofit Agencies Employing People Who are Blind or Severely Handicapped, when the thresholds in this deviation are exceeded. This deviation is effective until incorporated in the DFARS or rescinded.          Follow the procedures at PGI                 208.705              when placing orders with central nonprofit agencies.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

HAROLD KELLY MURPHY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-618-MEF

)

SOUTHERN ENERGY HOMES, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the plaintiff's Motion to Strike Reply to Response to Motion

for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. #44) filed on June 14, 2007, it is hereby 

ORDERED that the defendant show cause in writing on or before June 28, 2007 as

to why the motion should not be granted. 

DONE this the 18th day of June, 2007.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 45 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 1 of 1