773 San Marin Drive, Suite 2115 ● Novato, California 94998 USA (Tel): 415-899-0700  (Fax): 415-899-0707  www.environcorp.com

G:\WRAP MSEI2\PRP18b update\tech_memos\WRAP_NR_2018_memo_030309.doc 

## DRAFT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

To: Thomas Moore and Lee Gribovicz, WRAP

From: John Grant, Alison Pollac k, and Allison DenBleyker

Date: March 3, 2009
Subject: WRAP PRP18b NONROAD model equipment emissions assessment

INTRODUCTION

ENVIRON has been asked to review for potential update all on-road and off-road mobile source emissions estimates for use in the 2018 PRP 18b air quality modeling. ENVIRON originally developed a comprehensive mobile source emission inventory, including em issions from on-road vehicles, off-road equipment, locomotives, co mmercial marine vessels, and aircraft, in 2005 1



### . This memo addresses the emissions effects of two recently promulgated standards for nonroad engines, as well as emissions effects from updates to the EPA NONROAD model since the 2005 mobile source emissions estimates were prepared.

The 2005 WRAP off-road equipment emissions estimates 1 

### were generated with an older version of EPA’s NONROAD model, ve rsion NONROAD2004. Since that time, EPA has updated the model with new input data and revised emissions calculations, and released a model for air quality planners to use; this version is called NONROAD2005a and is the version currently available on EPA’s NONROAD modeling web page ( http://www.epa.gov/otaq/nonrdmdl.htm ). As part of their most recent rulemaking, EPA has also prepared an updated version of the model, NONROAD2005d, that is in the rulemaking docket but is not available on EPA’s web page.

ENVIRON has generated 2018 off-road equipment emission estimates for select areas using EPA’s NONROAD model, versions NON ROAD2005a and NONROAD2005d, and compared these results to the previous WR AP off-road equipment emissions estimates generated with the NONROAD2004 version. Based upon this comparis on, ENVIRON has estimated the changes in emissions resulting from the use of the most recent EPA NONROAD model and evaluated the significance of the changes in the context of th e overall WRAP emission inventory. Results of that analysis are provided below, first for EPA’s model update and then for updates to account for the latest rulemaking, along with our recommenda tions on what to use in PRP18b modeling.

EPA NONROAD2005A MODEL UPDATE

For off-road equipment emissions previously generated by ENVIRON 1 

### , the latest model at the time was EPA’s draft NONROAD2004. In Fe bruary 2006, EPA released the “final” NONROAD2005a model. There were a number of changes made by the EPA in the

1 Pollack, A.K., L. Chan, P. Chandraker, J. Grant, C. Lindhjem, S. Rao, J. Russell, C. Tran. 2006. “WRAP MOBILE Source Emissi on Inventories Update.” Prepared for Western Governors’ Association, Denver, CO. May.

### Page 2

773 San Marin Drive, Suite 2115 ● Novato, California 94998 USA

(Tel): 415-899-0700  (Fax): 415-899-0707  www.environcorp.com

G:\WRAP MSEI2\PRP18b update\tech_memos\WRAP_NR_2018_memo_030309.doc 

### NONROAD2005a model from the draft NONROAD2004 model. The most important changes

were:

 New evaporative emissions for tank permea tion, hose permeation, hot soak, and running loss emissions;

 Revision of diurnal emissions calculations;

 Revision of equipment population growth factors; and

 Update of equipment population allocation files based on the latest U.S. Census County Business Patterns data.

With these and other more minor updates, emissions estimates changed for all pollutants and most source categories. ENVIRON compared emission results generated by the older draft NONROAD2004 model and the NONROAD2005a mode l in the following five geographical

areas:

 The entire state of Arizona to evaluate statewide effects;

 Maricopa and Pinal Counties in Arizona to evaluate effects in urban counties;

 Garfield County, in Colorado, in order to ev aluate effects in a rural county with significant oil and gas activities a nd a major road, I70, through it; and

 Sublette County, in Wyoming, to evaluate eff ects in a rural county without a major road through it.

These model runs were all made for summer 2018, as the largest effects of the model changes were expected in the summer season when temper atures are highest and activity is typically highest.

Changes to the draft NONROAD2004 model to create the NONROAD2005a model affect the WRAP inventory emissions with varying ma gnitudes by pollutant and geographic area. Emissions comparisons between NONROAD 2004 and NONROAD2005a are presented in Appendix B for volatile organic compounds ( VOC), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOx) and particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5).

Relative to the draft NONROAD2004 model, VOC emissions estimated with the NONROAD2005a model increased in four of the fi ve geographical areas due to the addition of evaporative modes in the final model. Th e exception, Garfield County, showed emissions decreases across all pollutants, indicating that a VOC increase due to additional evaporative modes may have been offset by decreased equi pment population resulting from updated Census data in the allocation data file s. Pinal County also appears to have been affected by Census changes; emissions from the NONROAD2005a model showed large increases across all pollutants relative to the draft NONROAD2004 results . CO emissions changes were small (less than 2%) between model versions, with the ex ception of Garfield and Pinal Counties, where changes in population allo cation were significant.

Relative to the draft NONROAD2004 model, NOx emissions estimated with the NONROAD2005a model decreased by about 9% for both the state of Arizona and Maricopa

### Page 3

773 San Marin Drive, Suite 2115 ● Novato, California 94998 USA

(Tel): 415-899-0700  (Fax): 415-899-0707  www.environcorp.com

G:\WRAP MSEI2\PRP18b update\tech_memos\WRAP_NR_2018_memo_030309.doc 

### County. NOx increased by 40% for Pinal Count y, decreased by 19% in Garfield County, and increased by 10% in Sublette County. At the co unty level, a 40% increase could be significant; however, the Arizona statewide emissions show a more moderate 9% increase in NOx emissions.

Relative to the draft NONROAD2004 model, PM 10 and PM2.5 emissions estimated with the NONROAD2005a model increased negligibly for Maricopa County at 0.2% and 0.8%, respectively. There were also relatively small ch anges for the state of Ar izona, with decreases of 7.6% and 7% for PM10 and PM2.5, respectively. Ther e were very large increases in particulate emissions for Pinal County just as there were for the other pollutants, with PM10 and PM2.5 up 109% and 108%, respectively. Garfield Count y emissions decreased 29% and 28%, for PM10 and PM2.5, respectively.

While there were large changes to emissions from the draft NONROAD2004 model to the final 2005 model for some counties (Pinal, Garfield), the differences between model versions are more moderate for the state of Arizona, in par ticular for pollutants of interest to visibility concerns. The state of Arizona exhibited mode st decreases of NOx and PM2.5 emissions at 9% and 7%, respectively.

NEW EPA REGULATIONS

Subsequent to the release of the NONROAD2005a model, two standards were finalized for nonroad engines. These regulations are descri bed below, along with emissions reductions expected from the new standards.

Emissions Standards for Small SI Engines and Marine SI Engines

In September 2008, EPA finalized regulations for new exhaust emissions standards for small SI engines and marine SI engines ( http://www.epa.gov/OMS/re gs/nonroad/marinesiequipld/420f08013.htm ). The ruling covers SI engines ra ted less than 25 horsepower used in household and commercial applications. This is pr imarily lawn and garden equipment, but also includes a variety of other construction, farm, and i ndustrial equipment. The rule also covers SI engines used recreational in marine vessels, in cluding outboard engines, personal watercraft, and sterndrive/inboard engines.

While there are significant emi ssions reductions for these engine s, the contribution of these engines to the overall anthropogeni c emission inventory is not la rge, so the overall percent reduction is small. The reductions (small and mari ne SI combined) shown in Table 1, projected for year 2020, are derived from EPA’s Regulat ory Impact Analysis (RIA, available at http://www.epa.gov/OMS/equip-ld.htm ):

Table 1 . Emission reductions to small spark ignition (SI) engines and marine SI engines.

2020 Emissions Reductions VOC NOx PM10 Reduction as percent of baseline sm all and marine SI engines 39% 38% 11% Reduction as percent of baseline to tal mobile sources 12.3% 1.8% 1.3% Reduction as percent of baseline tota l anthropogenic sources 3.9% 0.9% 0.1%

### Page 4

773 San Marin Drive, Suite 2115 ● Novato, California 94998 USA

(Tel): 415-899-0700  (Fax): 415-899-0707  www.environcorp.com

G:\WRAP MSEI2\PRP18b update\tech_memos\WRAP_NR_2018_memo_030309.doc 

### To estimate these reductions, EPA developed a m odified version of their NONROAD model. The model version that is on EPA’s NONROA D web page is NONRO AD2005a; EPA’s version NONROAD2005d was developed for this rule. The updated version of the model is not posted on the NONROAD web page, but is available in the rule docket (not electronically); ENVIRON obtained a copy directly from EPA’s Of fice of Transportation and Air Quality.

ENVIRON used the same five scenarios as described above in the comparison of NONROAD2004 with NONROAD2005a to evaluate the effects on emissions of the new rule. We compared the NONROAD2005d model to the NONROAD2005a model for the five geographic areas to evaluate the estimated effects of the latest SI rule, and we also compared the NONROAD2005d model to the NONROAD2004 model in these areas to evaluate the combined effects of the model change and the SI rule.

Changes in emissions between the NONRO AD2005a model and the NONROAD2005d version are presented in Appendix B for each of the five geographic areas. The broad effect of the NONROAD2005d model was to decrease emissions of all pollutants. The largest decreases from the EPA ruling were for VOC and CO, as e xpected. Decreases ranged from 22% to 48% for VOC and 26% to 51% for CO. Decreases to NOx and PM were small or moderate for each of the five areas. Decreases of NOx emissions were 7% for Ma ricopa County, 11% for the state of Arizona, 1% for Pinal County, 7% for Garfie ld County, and 2% for Sublette County. PM2.5 emissions decreased by 3.5% for Maricopa Coun ty, 9.2% for the state of Arizona, 3.1% for Garfield County, and 3.8% for Sublette County, while the increased by 0 .4% for Pinal County. Changes to PM10 emissions were very similar to changes in PM2.5 emissions.

Snowmobile Emissions Standards Rule

In June 2008 there was a minor change to the snowmobiles emissions standards rule ( http://www.epa.gov/otaq/recveh.htm ). That action removed the Phase 3 NOx standards for the 2012 and later model year snowmobiles in response to a court decision. This rule change is not reflected in the NONROAD2005d model, nor has EPA implemented this rule in any version of the model (personal communication with Craig Harvey, EPA OTAQ).

The effect on emissions of the recent change to snowmobile emission standards is to increase emissions for model year 2012 and later snowmob iles. Table 2 shows 2018 NOx emissions from snowmobiles in the current WRAP 2018 emi ssion inventory (based on NONROAD2004). As shown for the winter season, when snowmobiles are most active, snowmobiles make up 4% of total off-road equipment emissions in the WRAP domain. As a fraction of total statewide offroad equipment emissions, snowmobiles contribu te less than ten percent of winter off-road emissions in most states and a higher proportion of emissions in Alaska, Wyoming, and Idaho. Annually, snowmobiles contribute only 1% of all off-road e quipment NOx emissions over the entire WRAP domain, and from 0% to 13% of off-road equipment NOx emissions by state.

In NONROAD2005, snowmobiles have a median life of 252 hours at full load, which translates to a median life of 13 years at the NONROA D2005 default average load of 0.34 and default annual use of 57 hours per year. Per NONRO AD2005 growth estimates, the snowmobile population is expected to grow by 17% from 20 12 and 2018. Even with the 17% growth rate,

### Page 5

773 San Marin Drive, Suite 2115 ● Novato, California 94998 USA

(Tel): 415-899-0700  (Fax): 415-899-0707  www.environcorp.com

G:\WRAP MSEI2\PRP18b update\tech_memos\WRAP_NR_2018_memo_030309.doc 

### given the 13 year median life, a large fracti on of the snowmobile population will be of model years prior to 2012 in calenda r year 2018 and thus unaffected by the rescinding of NOx emissions standards beginning in model year 2012.

Table 2. 2018 snowmobile NOx emissions in current WRAP inventory 1



### . 2018 NOx Emissions (tons per winter day)

State Snowmobile Emissions Total Off-road Equipment Emissions Fraction of Off-road Equipment Emissions from

Snowmobiles Winter Alaska 3.7 6.5 58% Arizona 0.7 28.7 2% California 1.0 296.3 0% Colorado 2.4 27.7 9% Idaho 2.4 13.2 18% Montana 1.0 11.2 9% Nevada 0.0 12.9 0% New Mexico 0.1 10.6 1% North Dakota 1.3 17.8 7% Oregon 1.1 22.8 5% South Dakota 1.1 16.9 6% Utah 1.6 23.4 7% Washington 1.8 32.7 6% Wyoming 2.3 7.5 30% Total 20.3 528.2 4% Annual Alaska 0.9 7.2 13% Arizona 0.2 45.7 0% California 0.5 296.3 0% Colorado 0.6 60.0 1% Idaho 0.6 33.3 2% Montana 0.2 33.8 1% Nevada 0.0 22.6 0% New Mexico 0.0 19.2 0% North Dakota 0.3 60.7 1% Oregon 0.3 52.9 0% South Dakota 0.3 57.9 0% Utah 0.4 40.7 1% Washington 0.5 73.1 1% Wyoming 0.6 17.1 3% Total 5.3 820.5 1%



### New Source Performance Standards

The New Source Performance Standard (NSPS) for stationary SI engines was promulgated in January 2009. This rulemaking does not apply to mobile sources, which are defined as being moved once per year or more. This rulemaki ng covers compressors and other oil and gas engines, and those reductions are being take n into account in the IPAMS/WRAP Phase III oil and gas emission inventory now being conducted by ENVIRON.

### Page 6

773 San Marin Drive, Suite 2115 ● Novato, California 94998 USA

(Tel): 415-899-0700  (Fax): 415-899-0707  www.environcorp.com

G:\WRAP MSEI2\PRP18b update\tech_memos\WRAP_NR_2018_memo_030309.doc 

### ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The cumulative effects of the change from the draft NONROAD2004 model to the NONROAD2005a model and the EPA rulemaking for new exhaust emissions standards for small SI engines and marine SI e ngines (NONROAD2005a to NONROAD200 5d) are additive in some cases and have offsetting effects in others. All of the percent changes previously discussed are in the context of changes to tota l off-road equipment emissions. Appendix A shows the by-sector 2018 (PRP18a) WRAP emissions inventory Error! Bookmark not defined.
, 

### , and also shows the fraction of the overall inventory from NONR OAD model sources. The net change in emissions from the use of the most recent NONROAD2005d model relative to the NONROA D2004 model used in the previous WRAP emission inventory 1 

### is placed into context of overall emissions in Table 3 for each of the five geographical areas mode led. That table shows that NONROAD model equipment emissions are only 8.5% of total NOx emissions, 1.3% of total PM2.5 emissions, and 0.1% of total SO 2 

### emissions. Table 3 expresses the percent reductions for each of the five geographical areas seen in the change s form NONROAD2004 to NONROAD2005d as a function of the overall 2018 emissi on inventory as shown in Appendi x A. As an example of the calculations, Maricopa County NOx emissions decreased 15.5% be tween NONROAD2004 and NONROAD2005d, and NONROAD equipment emissions contribute only 8.5% of all 2018 NOx emissions in WRAP states. The multiplicative e ffect is just a 1.3% decr ease in the overall 2018 emissions inventory as shown in Table 3. Wh ile the NONROAD equipment emissions’ percent of overall emissions will clearly vary by region, the table provides an indication of the very small overall changes in emissions that would result with updating the 2018 NONROAD equipment emissions.

Table 3. Emissions changes from NONROAD m odel updates and small SI regulations expressed as a percent of total 2018 emissions across all categories. Area VOC CO NOx PM10 PM2.5 Maricopa County -0.4% -8.6% -1.3% 0.0% 0.0% State of Arizona -0.4% -8.2% -1.6% -0.1% -0.2% Pinal County 1.0% 3.2% 3.3% 0.5% 1.4% Garfield County -0.5% -10.4% -2.1% -0.2% -0.4% Sublette County -0.2% -4.4% 0.6% 0.0% 0.1%



### The net changes to emissions as shown in Table 3 for the key visibility -related pollutants are very small, at most a few percent. Updati ng all 2018 nonroad emissions using the latest model from EPA would require significant resources (budget and time). A nother factor to consider is that the EPA model changes from versi on NONROAD2004 to NONROAD2005a affect not only the 2018 future year, but also the 2002 base year . The direction and size of these differences would not be the same as shown for the effect s of the model change in 2018 as shown in Appendix B, because fleet turnover from 2002 to 2018 shifts the distribution of emissions by pollutant and source category. We did not have th e resources to so an evaluation as we did for 2002, but we estimated the effects of the model change on State of Arizona emissions in 2002 as about 8% increase in NOx emissions, 2% incr ease in PM2.5 emissions, and 27% increase in VOC emissions. Those estimates are very differe nt in both magnitude and direction from the same comparison for year 2018 as shown in Appendix B.

### Page 7

773 San Marin Drive, Suite 2115 ● Novato, California 94998 USA

(Tel): 415-899-0700  (Fax): 415-899-0707  www.environcorp.com

G:\WRAP MSEI2\PRP18b update\tech_memos\WRAP_NR_2018_memo_030309.doc 

### Given the very small effect the NONROAD model upda tes and small SI rule effects are likely to have on the overall emission inve ntory, the significant resources that would be required to exercise the model in all WRAP states for all se asons, and the fact that there would then be an apples and oranges comparison if the 2002 emissions were also not updated, ENVIRON recommends that WRAP not update the NONRO AD equipment emissions inventory using the latest NONROAD2005d model for the PRP18b inventory.

We do, however, recommend that States use the la test EPA model, incor porating the small SI rule and previous model changes, in any local air quality planning efforts.

ENVIRON has two additional recommendations in regards to updating the 2018 nonroad emissions:

 Snowmobile emissions contribute only 1% of 2018 WRAP region-wide annual off-road equipment NOx emissions, and less than 0,1% of the total region-wide NOx emissions shown in Appendix A. Given these very sma ll contribution of snow mobile emissions to total 2018 NOx emissions, and the fact th at EPA has not updated the NONROAD model for the minor amendments to the snowmobile emissions standards, ENVIRON recommends not updating the WRAP PRP18b emission inventory to account for the amended rule.

 All NONROAD oil field equipment emissions from the WRAP off-road equipment modeling inventories outside of California should be removed from the current PRP18b inventories. NONROAD oil field equipment emissions are estimated by the NONROAD model for SCCs 2260010010, 2265010010, 2267010010, 2268010010, 2270010010; the NONROAD emissions estimates for such equipment are extremely small as they are based on inappropriate activity data. ENVIRON has esti mated oil field equipment emissions in a separate project for WRAP a nd these are currently in the PRP18a emission inventories; excluding the sm all amount of emissions from these sources in the NONROAD model will avoid double-counting.

### APPENDIX A

Table A1. PRP18a WRAP total annual emissions by sector 2 

### , with NONROAD category detail added. Sector VOC CO NOX PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NH3 Fires 436,714 8,928,013 202,217 726,518 627,618 53,856 45,263 Area 1,860,528 1,446,307 320,345 240,738 211,012 110,772 25,430 Point 299,700 752,028 895,549 190,862 58,607 535,055 14,031 Non Road 328,247 4,367,813 594,397 43,367 39,320 4,074 1,409 Off-Road Equipment 320,477 4,106,348 299,491 23,172 21,111 722 702 Aircraft & Locom. 7,770 261,465 294,906 20,195 18,209 3,352 707 Onroad 400,626 5,708,505 519,09 0 36,368 23,618 5,933 71,408 Biogenic 18,197,340 2,624,814 286,996 0 0 0 0 WOG 749,979 68,260 191,728 0 0 89 0 Road Dust 0 0 0 689,599 72,821 0 0 Fugitive Dust 0 0 0 1,123,032 166,125 0 0 Wind-Blown Dust 0 0 0 1,962,165 431,676 0 0 Offshore Platforms 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Offshore Shipping 367,468 40,868 524,797 36,352 35,220 280,561 149 Ag Ammonia 0 0 0 0 0 0 817,256 Total 22,640,603 23,936,606 3,535,119 5 ,049,001 1,666,017 990341 974946



### Table A2. PRP18a WRAP off-road equipment fractions of total emissions. Sector VOC CO NOX PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NH3 Off-road Equipment Fractions 1.4% 17.2% 8.5% 0.1% 1.3% 0.1% 0.1%

2 WRAP, 2007. WRAP Regional Modeling Center - Simulation Specifications

. http://pah.cert.ucr.edu/aqm/308/spec_ sheets/SpecSheet_PRP18a_11_03_2008.pdf . April.

### APPENDIX B

NONROAD MODELING RESULTS BY GEOGRAPHICAL AREA

### Page B-1



### State of Arizona NONROAD modeling results

NOx Emissions (tpd) for Arizona, 2018 summer season average day
Sum of NOx Model Version Emission Source Category NR04 NR05a NR05d NR04 to NR05a NR04 to NR05d NR05a to NR05d Agricultural Equipment 7.99 7.70 7.76 -3.6% -2.9% 0.8% Airport Ground Support Equipment 0.49 0.54 0.55 11.5% 12.4% 0.8% Commercial Equipment 4.01 3.79 3.35 -5.6% -16.5% -11.6% Construction and Mining Equipment 22.13 19.61 19.74 -11.4% -10.8% 0.7% Industrial Equipment 2.96 3.35 3.35 13.0% 13.0% 0.0% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Com) 7.80 7.70 5.95 -1.3% -23.8% -22.8% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Res) 1.18 1.18 0.68 0.1% -42.6% -42.7% Logging Equipment 0.04 0.04 0.04 1.4% -2.7% -4.0% Pleasure Craft 11.34 8.67 5.59 -23.5% -50.7% -35.6% Railroad Equipment 0.10 0.10 0.10 -5.3% -4.0% 1.4% Recreational Equipment 0.95 0.88 0.77 -7.6% -19.5% -13.0% Grand Total 59.00 53.57 47.87 -9.2% -18.9% -10.6%

Total VOC Emissions (tpd) for Arizona, 2018 summer season average day
Sum of VOC* Model Version Emission Source Category NR04 NR05a NR05d NR04 to NR05a NR04 to NR05d NR05a to NR05d Agricultural Equipment 0.93 0.92 0.87 -0.6% -6.7% -6.1% Airport Ground Support Equipment 0.06 0.06 0.06 6.5% -0.8% -6.9% Commercial Equipment 5.59 9.48 4.99 69.5% -10.8% -47.4% Construction and Mining Equipment 4.53 4.15 3.71 -8.4% -18.1% -10.6% Industrial Equipment 0.36 0.41 0.40 14.8% 10.3% -3.9% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Com) 33.99 40.45 29.63 19.0% -12.8% -26.7% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Res) 9.93 22.90 9.03 130.6% -9.1% -60.6% Logging Equipment 0.13 0.15 0.12 9.9% -7.7% -16.0% Pleasure Craft 50.06 59.69 12.94 19.2% -74.2% -78.3% Railroad Equipment 0.02 0.02 0.02 9.7% -8.5% -16.5% Recreational Equipment 15.15 22.48 21.74 48.4% 43.5% -3.3% Grand Total 120.77 160.73 83.50 33.1% -30.9% -48.0%

CO Emissions (tpd) for Arizona, 2018 summer season average day
Sum of CO Model Version Emission Source Category NR04 NR05a NR05d NR04 to NR05a NR04 to NR05d NR05a to NR05d Agricultural Equipment 10.97 9.96 7.97 -9.2% -27.4% -20.1% Airport Ground Support Equipment 0.78 0.80 0.51 2.5% -34.8% -36.4% Commercial Equipment 305.00 312.53 148.19 2.5% -51.4% -52.6% Construction and Mining Equipment 66.20 55.80 33.88 -15.7% -48.8% -39.3% Industrial Equipment 7.46 8.70 7.74 16.6% 3.7% -11.1% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Com) 1307.61 1327.39 637.16 1.5% -51.3% -52.0% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Res) 359.84 365.19 176.78 1.5% -50.9% -51.6% Logging Equipment 1.88 1.92 1.24 2.6% -33.8% -35.5% Pleasure Craft 293.29 247.99 176.89 -15.4% -39.7% -28.7% Railroad Equipment 0.49 0.49 0.27 2.0% -45.1% -46.2% Recreational Equipment 167.46 172.87 130.80 3.2% -21.9% -24.3% Grand Total 2520.98 2503.66 1321.42 -0.7% -47.6% -47.2%

Exhaust PM10 Emissions (tpd) for Arizona, 2018 summer season average day
Sum of PM10 Model Version Emission Source Category NR04 NR05a NR05d NR04 to NR05a NR04 to NR05d NR05a to NR05d Agricultural Equipment 0.43 0.57 0.57 32.5% 32.5% 0.0% Airport Ground Support Equipment 0.01 0.04 0.04 172.6% 173.0% 0.2% Commercial Equipment 0.33 0.32 0.33 -3.1% 1.2% 4.5% Construction and Mining Equipment 1.27 1.71 1.71 34.6% 34.8% 0.1% Industrial Equipment 0.08 0.15 0.15 82.3% 82.5% 0.1% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Com) 2.34 2.43 2.51 4.0% 7.2% 3.1% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Res) 0.28 0.29 0.31 3.1% 10.7% 7.3% Logging Equipment 0.01 0.02 0.02 14.7% 14.7% 0.0% Pleasure Craft 2.36 0.90 0.14 -61.8% -94.0% -84.2% Railroad Equipment 0.01 0.01 0.01 2.1% 2.2% 0.1% Recreational Equipment 0.49 0.60 0.60 21.1% 21.2% 0.1% Grand Total 7.62 7.04 6.39 -7.6% -16.1% -9.2%

Exhaust PM2.5 Emissions (tpd) for Arizona, 2018 summer season average day
Sum of PM2.5 Model Version Emission Source Category NR04 NR05a NR05d NR04 to NR05a NR04 to NR05d NR05a to NR05d Agricultural Equipment 0.42 0.55 0.55 32.5% 32.5% 0.0% Airport Ground Support Equipment 0.01 0.04 0.04 172.7% 173.1% 0.2% Commercial Equipment 0.31 0.30 0.31 -3.2% 1.0% 4.4% Construction and Mining Equipment 1.22 1.65 1.65 35.0% 35.1% 0.1% Industrial Equipment 0.08 0.15 0.15 80.9% 81.1% 0.1% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Com) 2.16 2.25 2.32 4.0% 7.3% 3.1% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Res) 0.26 0.27 0.29 3.1% 10.7% 7.3% Logging Equipment 0.01 0.01 0.01 15.5% 15.5% 0.0% Pleasure Craft 2.17 0.83 0.13 -61.7% -94.0% -84.2% Railroad Equipment 0.01 0.01 0.01 2.1% 2.2% 0.1% Recreational Equipment 0.45 0.55 0.55 20.8% 21.0% 0.1% Grand Total 7.12 6.62 6.02 -7.0% -15.4% -9.0% % Difference by Category % Difference by Category

% Difference by Category

% Difference by Category

% Difference by Category NOx Emissions - All Categories

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

NR04 NR05a NR05d

Total VOC Emissions - All Categories

0 50 100 150 200

NR04 NR05a NR05d

CO Emissions - All Categories

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000

NR04 NR05a NR05d

Exhaust PM10 Emissions - All Categories

0 2 4 6 8 10

NR04 NR05a NR05d

Exhaust PM2.5 Emissions - All Categories

0 2 4 6 8

NR04 NR05a NR05d

### Page B-2



### Pinal County, Arizona NONROAD modeling results

NOx Emissions (tpd) for Pinal County, 2018 summer season average day
Sum of NOx Model Version Emission Source Category NR04 NR05a NR05d NR04 to NR05a NR04 to NR05d NR05a to NR05d Agricultural Equipment 1.84 1.80 1.82 -2.0% -1.3% 0.8% Airport Ground Support Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.0% 100.0% 0.8% Commercial Equipment 0.06 0.05 0.05 -13.1% -23.2% -11.7% Construction and Mining Equipment 0.30 1.13 1.14 282.1% 284.7% 0.7% Industrial Equipment 0.08 0.08 0.08 3.8% 3.8% 0.0% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Com) 0 .00 0.14 0.11 100.0% 100.0% -22.9% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Res) 0 .03 0.05 0.03 42.8% -18.1% -42.7% Pleasure Craft 0.01 0.00 0.01 -37.5% -21.1% 26.2% Railroad Equipment 0.00 0.01 0.01 163.1% 166.9% 1.4% Recreational Equipment 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.4% -18.1% -18.4% Grand Total 2.36 3.31 3.27 40.5% 38.7% -1.3%

Total VOC Emissions (tpd) for Pinal County, 2018 summer season average day
Sum of VOC* Model Version Emission Source Category NR04 NR05a NR05d NR04 to NR05a NR04 to NR05d NR05a to NR05d Agricultural Equipment 0.22 0.22 0.21 2.4% -4.0% -6.3% Airport Ground Support Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.0% 100.0% -7.0% Commercial Equipment 0.09 0.14 0.07 58.9% -16.0% -47.1% Construction and Mining Equipment 0.06 0.24 0.22 297.7% 254.1% -10.9% Industrial Equipment 0.01 0.01 0.01 -8.0% -11.0% -3.3% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Com) 0 .00 0.76 0.55 100.0% 100.0% -27.0% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Res) 0.29 0.93 0.37 221.2% 29.0% -59.8% Pleasure Craft 0.07 0.09 0.02 27.5% -76.6% -81.7% Railroad Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 208.9% 156.1% -17.1% Recreational Equipment 0.62 0.91 0.87 47.6% 40.7% -4.7% Grand Total 1.35 3.30 2.32 144.1% 71.6% -29.7%

CO Emissions (tpd) for Pinal County, 2018 summer season average day
Sum of CO Model Version Emission Source Category NR04 NR05a NR05d NR04 to NR05a NR04 to NR05d NR05a to NR05d Agricultural Equipment 2.51 2.32 1.85 -7.7% -26.1% -20.0% Airport Ground Support Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.0% 100.0% -36.3% Commercial Equipment 4.39 4.21 1.99 -4.1% -54.5% -52.6% Construction and Mining Equipment 0.87 3.20 1.95 266.2% 122.5% -39.2% Industrial Equipment 0.18 0.15 0.14 -16.2% -25.1% -10.6% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Com) 0 .00 24.34 11.68 100.0% 100.0% -52.0% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Res) 9 .31 13.69 6.63 47.1% -28.8% -51.6% Pleasure Craft 0.35 0.23 0.20 -34.9% -44.3% -14.4% Railroad Equipment 0.02 0.04 0.02 185.1% 53.6% -46.1% Recreational Equipment 7.99 8.63 5.90 8.0% -26.2% -31.6% Grand Total 25.62 56.82 30.36 121.8% 18.5% -46.6%

Exhaust PM10 Emissions (tpd) for Pinal County, 2018 summer season average day
Sum of PM10 Model Version Emission Source Category NR04 NR05a NR05d NR04 to NR05a NR04 to NR05d NR05a to NR05d Agricultural Equipment 0.10 0.13 0.13 34.7% 34.7% 0.0% Airport Ground Support Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.0% 100.0% 0.2% Commercial Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 -10.3% -6.3% 4.5% Construction and Mining Equipment 0.02 0.10 0.10 480.7% 481.3% 0.1% Industrial Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 70.8% 71.0% 0.1% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Com) 0.00 0.04 0.05 100.0% 100.0% 3.1% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Res) 0.01 0.01 0.01 48.7% 59.5% 7.3% Pleasure Craft 0.00 0.00 0.00 -63.5% -96.6% -90.6% Railroad Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 183.9% 184.2% 0.1% Recreational Equipment 0.02 0.02 0.02 21.3% 21.6% 0.2% Grand Total 0.15 0.32 0.32 108.9% 109.7% 0.4%

Exhaust PM2.5 Emissions (tpd) for Pinal County, 2018 summer season average day
Sum of PM2.5 Model Version Emission Source Category NR04 NR05a NR05d NR04 to NR05a NR04 to NR05d NR05a to NR05d Agricultural Equipment 0.10 0.13 0.13 34.7% 34.7% 0.0% Airport Ground Support Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.0% 100.0% 0.2% Commercial Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 -10.4% -6.5% 4.4% Construction and Mining Equipment 0.02 0.10 0.10 482.1% 482.7% 0.1% Industrial Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 69.0% 69.2% 0.1% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Com) 0.00 0.04 0.04 100.0% 100.0% 3.1% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Res) 0.01 0.01 0.01 48.6% 59.5% 7.3% Pleasure Craft 0.00 0.00 0.00 -63.5% -96.6% -90.6% Railroad Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 183.6% 183.9% 0.1% Recreational Equipment 0.02 0.02 0.02 21.0% 21.3% 0.2% Grand Total 0.15 0.31 0.31 108.4% 109.1% 0.4% % Difference by Category % Difference by Category

% Difference by Category

% Difference by Category

% Difference by Category NOx Emissions - All Categories

0 0.5

1 1.5

2 2.5

3 3.5

NR04 NR05a NR05d

Total VOC Emissions - All Categories

0 0.5

1 1.5

2 2.5

3 3.5

NR04 NR05a NR05d

CO Emissions - All Categories

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

NR04 NR05a NR05d

Exhaust PM10 Emissions - All Categories

0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35

NR04 NR05a NR05d

Exhaust PM2.5 Emissions - All Categories

0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35

NR04 NR05a NR05d

### Page B-3



### Maricopa County, Arizona NONROAD modeling results

NOx Emissions (tpd) for Maricopa County, 2018 summer season average day
Sum of NOx Model Version Emission Source Category NR04 NR05a NR05d NR04 to NR05a NR04 to NR05d NR05a to NR05d Agricultural Equipment 2.36 2.01 2.03 -14.8% -14.1% 0.8% Airport Ground Support Equipment 0.45 0.46 0.46 1.2% 2.0% 0.8% Commercial Equipment 2.73 2.68 2.38 -1.7% -12.6% -11.1% Construction and Mining Equipment 15.25 13.37 13.46 -12.3% -11.7% 0.7% Industrial Equipment 2.02 2.22 2.22 10.2% 10.2% 0.0% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Com) 5.96 5.76 4.49 -3.3% -24.8% -22.2% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Res) 0.68 0.65 0.37 -4.2% -45.0% -42.6% Logging Equipment 0.02 0.00 0.00 -100.0% -100.0% 0.0% Pleasure Craft 1.93 1.40 1.18 -27.4% -38.6% -15.5% Railroad Equipment 0.06 0.01 0.01 -79.2% -78.9% 1.5% Recreational Equipment 0.13 0.14 0.08 7.1% -35.5% -39.8% Grand Total 31.59 28.71 26.70 -9.1% -15.5% -7.0%

Total VOC Emissions (tpd) for Maric opa County, 2018 summer season average day
Sum of VOC* Model Version Emission Source Category NR04 NR05a NR05d NR04 to NR05a NR04 to NR05d NR05a to NR05d Agricultural Equipment 0.27 0.24 0.23 -9.8% -16.3% -7.2% Airport Ground Support Equipment 0.06 0.06 0.05 -2.9% -10.0% -7.3% Commercial Equipment 3.84 7.31 3.60 90.2% -6.4% -50.8% Construction and Mining Equipment 3.13 2.87 2.53 -8.2% -19.0% -11.8% Industrial Equipment 0.26 0.28 0.27 10.8% 6.0% -4.4% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Com) 26.19 31.92 22.86 21.9% -12.7% -28.4% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Res) 5.95 14.96 5.25 151.4% -11.7% -64.9% Logging Equipment 0.07 0.00 0.00 -100.0% -100.0% 0.0% Pleasure Craft 12.15 16.65 3.22 37.1% -73.5% -80.7% Railroad Equipment 0.01 0.00 0.00 -75.6% -79.9% -17.7% Recreational Equipment 1.05 1.59 1.32 51.8% 26.4% -16.8% Grand Total 52.97 75.89 39.34 43.3% -25.7% -48.2%

CO Emissions (tpd) for Maricopa County, 2018 summer season average day
Sum of CO Model Version Emission Source Category NR04 NR05a NR05d NR04 to NR05a NR04 to NR05d NR05a to NR05d Agricultural Equipment 3.30 2.65 2.11 -19.7% -36.0% -20.2% Airport Ground Support Equipment 0.73 0.69 0.44 -5.6% -40.3% -36.7% Commercial Equipment 211.73 229.83 108.93 8.5% -48.6% -52.6% Construction and Mining Equipment 46.13 38.75 23.43 -16.0% -49.2% -39.5% Industrial Equipment 5.53 6.17 5.47 11.6% -1.0% -11.3% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Com) 1012.89 1044.99 500.88 3.2% -50.5% -52.1% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Res) 218.73 215.85 104.43 -1.3% -52.3% -51.6% Logging Equipment 1.00 0.00 0.00 -100.0% -100.0% 0.0% Pleasure Craft 71.63 53.09 41.29 -25.9% -42.4% -22.2% Railroad Equipment 0.29 0.07 0.04 -77.5% -87.9% -46.3% Recreational Equipment 40.09 44.24 21.83 10.4% -45.5% -50.7% Grand Total 1612.05 1636.32 808.84 1.5% -49.8% -50.6%

Exhaust PM10 Emissions (tpd) for Maricopa County, 2018 summer season average day
Sum of PM10 Model Version Emission Source Category NR04 NR05a NR05d NR04 to NR05a NR04 to NR05d NR05a to NR05d Agricultural Equipment 0.13 0.15 0.15 17.2% 17.2% 0.0% Airport Ground Support Equipment 0.01 0.03 0.03 147.5% 147.9% 0.2% Commercial Equipment 0.22 0.23 0.24 1.5% 6.1% 4.5% Construction and Mining Equipment 0.88 1.17 1.17 33.2% 33.4% 0.1% Industrial Equipment 0.06 0.10 0.10 67.6% 67.8% 0.1% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Com) 1.80 1.87 1.93 4.0% 7.2% 3.1% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Res) 0.17 0.17 0.18 -0.3% 7.0% 7.3% Logging Equipment 0.01 0.00 0.00 -100.0% -100.0% 0.0% Pleasure Craft 0.69 0.26 0.03 -62.8% -95.6% -88.0% Railroad Equipment 0.01 0.00 0.00 -77.6% -77.6% 0.1% Recreational Equipment 0.03 0.03 0.03 19.7% 21.4% 1.4% Grand Total 4.00 4.01 3.87 0.2% -3.4% -3.6%

Exhaust PM2.5 Emissions (t pd) for Maricopa County, 2018 summer season average day
Sum of PM2.5 Model Version Emission Source Category NR04 NR05a NR05d NR04 to NR05a NR04 to NR05d NR05a to NR05d Agricultural Equipment 0.12 0.14 0.14 17.2% 17.2% 0.0% Airport Ground Support Equipment 0.01 0.03 0.03 147.5% 147.9% 0.2% Commercial Equipment 0.21 0.22 0.23 1.4% 5.8% 4.4% Construction and Mining Equipment 0.84 1.13 1.13 33.6% 33.7% 0.1% Industrial Equipment 0.06 0.10 0.10 66.3% 66.5% 0.1% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Com) 1.66 1.73 1.78 4.0% 7.2% 3.1% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Res) 0.16 0.15 0.17 -0.3% 7.0% 7.3% Logging Equipment 0.01 0.00 0.00 -100.0% -100.0% 0.0% Pleasure Craft 0.64 0.24 0.03 -62.8% -95.5% -88.0% Railroad Equipment 0.01 0.00 0.00 -77.6% -77.6% 0.1% Recreational Equipment 0.03 0.03 0.03 19.5% 21.2% 1.4% Grand Total 3.75 3.78 3.64 0.8% -2.8% -3.5% % Difference by Category % Difference by Category

% Difference by Category

% Difference by Category

% Difference by Category NOx Emissions - All Categories

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

NR04 NR05a NR05d

Total VOC Emissions - All Categories

0 20 40 60 80

NR04 NR05a NR05d

CO Emissions - All Categories

0 500 1000 1500 2000

NR04 NR05a NR05d

Exhaust PM10 Emissions - All Categories

0 1 2 3 4 5

NR04 NR05a NR05d

Exhaust PM2.5 Emissions - All Categories

0 1 2 3 4

NR04 NR05a NR05d

### Page B-4



### Garfield County, Colorado NONROAD modeling results

NOx Emissions (tpd) for Garfield Count y, 2018 summer season average day
Sum of NOx Model Version Emission Source Category NR04 NR05a NR05d NR04 to NR05a NR04 to NR05d NR05a to NR05d Agricultural Equipment 0.36 0.12 0.12 -67.2% -66.9% 0.9% Airport Ground Support Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.0% 100.0% 0.8% Commercial Equipment 0.04 0.04 0.04 10.8% -3.7% -13.1% Construction and Mining Equipment 0.16 0.32 0.32 104.9% 106.3% 0.7% Industrial Equipment 0.11 0.04 0.04 -64.4% -65.5% -3.1% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Com) 0.11 0.06 0.05 -39.9% -54.8% -24.8% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Res) 0.02 0.02 0.01 30.4% -25.8% -43.1% Logging Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.0% 100.0% -4.8% Pleasure Craft 0.10 0.12 0.10 20.1% -2.0% -18.3% Railroad Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 222.0% 226.3% 1.3% Recreational Equipment 0.04 0.01 0.01 -60.0% -67.5% -18.7% Grand Total 0.92 0.74 0.69 -19.0% -24.8% -7.1%

Total VOC Emissions (tpd) for Garfield County, 2018 summer season average day
Sum of VOC* Model Version Emission Source Category NR04 NR05a NR05d NR04 to NR05a NR04 to NR05d NR05a to NR05d Agricultural Equipment 0.04 0.01 0.01 -67.7% -69.3% -4.7% Airport Ground Support Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.0% 100.0% -6.1% Commercial Equipment 0.05 0.08 0.05 69.8% 1.2% -40.4% Construction and Mining Equipment 0.03 0.06 0.06 104.1% 88.7% -7.5% Industrial Equipment 0.05 0.01 0.01 -78.3% -83.0% -21.5% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Com) 0.39 0.27 0.20 -30.0% -46.9% -24.1% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Res) 0.09 0.19 0.10 115.9% 16.9% -45.8% Logging Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.0% 100.0% -9.9% Pleasure Craft 0.43 0.47 0.26 9.3% -38.8% -44.0% Railroad Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 257.5% 208.6% -13.7% Recreational Equipment 0.51 0.29 0.28 -42.9% -44.8% -3.3% Grand Total 1.59 1.40 0.99 -11.9% -37.8% -29.4%

CO Emissions (tpd) for Garfield Count y, 2018 summer season average day
Sum of CO Model Version Emission Source Category NR04 NR05a NR05d NR04 to NR05a NR04 to NR05d NR05a to NR05d Agricultural Equipment 0.52 0.17 0.13 -67.8% -74.8% -21.8% Airport Ground Support Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.0% 100.0% -35.8% Commercial Equipment 2.57 3.12 1.48 21.6% -42.3% -52.5% Construction and Mining Equipment 0.45 0.86 0.53 91.9% 18.5% -38.3% Industrial Equipment 3.81 0.68 0.31 -82.2% -91.8% -53.9% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Com) 14.88 9.51 4.55 -36.1% -69.5% -52.2% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Res) 3.65 4.91 2.37 34.3% -35.0% -51.6% Logging Equipment 0.00 0.04 0.02 100.0% 100.0% -35.0% Pleasure Craft 1.91 2.01 1.81 5.2% -4.9% -9.6% Railroad Equipment 0.00 0.01 0.01 248.3% 88.9% -45.8% Recreational Equipment 5.33 2.72 1.91 -49.1% -64.3% -29.8% Grand Total 33.11 24.01 13.12 -27.5% -60.4% -45.3%

Exhaust PM10 Emissions (tpd) for Garfield County, 2018 summer season average day
Sum of PM10 Model Version Emission Source Category NR04 NR05a NR05d NR04 to NR05a NR04 to NR05d NR05a to NR05d Agricultural Equipment 0.02 0.01 0.01 -60.2% -60.2% 0.0% Airport Ground Support Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.0% 100.0% 0.2% Commercial Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.5% 18.6% 4.5% Construction and Mining Equipment 0.01 0.03 0.03 213.5% 213.0% -0.1% Industrial Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 -17.9% -16.9% 1.2% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Com) 0.03 0.02 0.02 -35.4% -33.2% 3.5% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Res) 0.00 0.00 0.00 35.7% 46.2% 7.8% Logging Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% Pleasure Craft 0.03 0.01 0.00 -72.4% -85.0% -45.5% Railroad Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 244.9% 245.3% 0.1% Recreational Equipment 0.02 0.01 0.01 -54.2% -54.1% 0.2% Grand Total 0.11 0.08 0.08 -28.5% -30.7% -3.1%

Exhaust PM2.5 Emissions (tpd) for Garfield County, 2018 summer season average day
Sum of PM2.5 Model Version Emission Source Category NR04 NR05a NR05d NR04 to NR05a NR04 to NR05d NR05a to NR05d Agricultural Equipment 0.02 0.01 0.01 -60.2% -60.2% 0.0% Airport Ground Support Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.0% 100.0% 0.2% Commercial Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.4% 18.3% 4.4% Construction and Mining Equipment 0.01 0.03 0.03 214.3% 213.8% -0.1% Industrial Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 -17.2% -16.3% 1.1% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Com) 0.02 0.02 0.02 -35.4% -33.2% 3.4% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Res) 0.00 0.00 0.00 35.7% 46.2% 7.8% Logging Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% Pleasure Craft 0.03 0.01 0.00 -72.3% -84.9% -45.4% Railroad Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 246.0% 246.4% 0.1% Recreational Equipment 0.02 0.01 0.01 -54.3% -54.2% 0.2% Grand Total 0.10 0.07 0.07 -27.8% -30.0% -3.1% % Difference by Category % Difference by Category

% Difference by Category

% Difference by Category

% Difference by Category NOx Emissions - All Categories

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

1

NR04 NR05a NR05d

Total VOC Emissions - All Categories

0 0.5

1 1.5

2

NR04 NR05a NR05d

CO Emissions - All Categories

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

NR04 NR05a NR05d

Exhaust PM10 Emissions - All Categories

0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12

NR04 NR05a NR05d

Exhaust PM2.5 Emissions - All Categories

0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12

NR04 NR05a NR05d

### Page B-5



### Sublette County, Wyoming NONROAD modeling results

NOx Emissions (tpd) for Sublette County, 2018 summer season average day
Sum of NOx Model Version Emission Source Category NR04 NR05a NR05d NR04 to NR05a NR04 to NR05d NR05a to NR05d Agricultural Equipment 1.18 1.42 1.43 20.0% 21.0% 0.8% Airport Ground Support Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.0% 100.0% 0.8% Commercial Equipment 0.01 0.01 0.01 16.1% -0.2% -14.0% Construction and Mining Equipment 0.07 0.06 0.06 -12.8% -12.3% 0.6% Industrial Equipment 0.03 0.01 0.01 -74.4% -75.5% -4.2% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Com) 0.00 0.01 0.00 100.0% 100.0% -25.8% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Res) 0.00 0.00 0.00 -5.7% -46.4% -43.2% Logging Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.0% 100.0% -5.3% Pleasure Craft 0.49 0.45 0.39 -8.5% -18.9% -11.4% Railroad Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 -100.0% -100.0% 0.0% Recreational Equipment 0.02 0.02 0.02 -2.2% -9.5% -7.5% Grand Total 1.80 1.97 1.93 9.6% 7.1% -2.3%

Total VOC Emissions (tpd) for Sublette County, 2018 summer season average day
Sum of VOC* Model Version Emission Source Category NR04 NR05a NR05d NR04 to NR05a NR04 to NR05d NR05a to NR05d Agricultural Equipment 0.14 0.17 0.17 20.2% 17.0% -2.6% Airport Ground Support Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.0% 100.0% -5.9% Commercial Equipment 0.01 0.01 0.01 67.7% 4.1% -37.9% Construction and Mining Equipment 0.01 0.01 0.01 -13.7% -19.8% -7.1% Industrial Equipment 0.01 0.00 0.00 -82.7% -86.5% -21.9% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Com) 0.00 0.02 0.02 100.0% 100.0% -23.4% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Res) 0.02 0.03 0.02 42.3% -16.0% -41.0% Logging Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.0% 100.0% -7.9% Pleasure Craft 0.46 0.44 0.24 -4.7% -47.8% -45.2% Railroad Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 -100.0% -100.0% 0.0% Recreational Equipment 0.30 0.38 0.37 26.8% 23.9% -2.3% Grand Total 0.97 1.08 0.84 11.7% -13.0% -22.1%

CO Emissions (tpd) for Sublette County, 2018 summer season average day
Sum of CO Model Version Emission Source Category NR04 NR05a NR05d NR04 to NR05a NR04 to NR05d NR05a to NR05d Agricultural Equipment 1.77 2.04 1.71 15.3% -3.2% -16.1% Airport Ground Support Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.0% 100.0% -35.4% Commercial Equipment 0.36 0.46 0.22 27.8% -39.4% -52.6% Construction and Mining Equipment 0.19 0.16 0.10 -16.4% -48.5% -38.5% Industrial Equipment 1.12 0.16 0.08 -85.3% -93.2% -54.0% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Com) 0.00 0.84 0.40 100.0% 100.0% -52.2% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Res) 1.00 0.97 0.47 -2.8% -53.0% -51.6% Logging Equipment 0.00 0.01 0.01 100.0% 100.0% -34.8% Pleasure Craft 2.49 2.05 1.76 -17.4% -29.2% -14.2% Railroad Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 -100.0% -100.0% 0.0% Recreational Equipment 2.23 2.54 2.06 13.9% -7.6% -18.9% Grand Total 9.15 9.23 6.80 1.0% -25.7% -26.4%

Exhaust PM10 Emissions (tpd) for Sublette County, 2018 summer season average day
Sum of PM10 Model Version Emission Source Category NR04 NR05a NR05d NR04 to NR05a NR04 to NR05d NR05a to NR05d Agricultural Equipment 0.07 0.11 0.11 46.9% 47.0% 0.0% Airport Ground Support Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.0% 100.0% 0.2% Commercial Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.0% 24.4% 4.5% Construction and Mining Equipment 0.00 0.01 0.01 32.5% 32.6% 0.1% Industrial Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 -38.6% -37.7% 1.4% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Com) 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.0% 100.0% 3.5% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Res) 0.00 0.00 0.00 -1.8% 5.8% 7.8% Logging Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% Pleasure Craft 0.03 0.01 0.01 -63.0% -78.8% -42.6% Railroad Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 -100.0% -100.0% 0.0% Recreational Equipment 0.01 0.01 0.01 8.8% 8.9% 0.1% Grand Total 0.12 0.14 0.13 12.8% 8.5% -3.9%

Exhaust PM2.5 Emissions (tpd) for Sublette County, 2018 summer season average day
Sum of PM2.5 Model Version Emission Source Category NR04 NR05a NR05d NR04 to NR05a NR04 to NR05d NR05a to NR05d Agricultural Equipment 0.07 0.10 0.10 47.0% 47.0% 0.0% Airport Ground Support Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.0% 100.0% 0.2% Commercial Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.4% 23.6% 4.4% Construction and Mining Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.8% 33.0% 0.1% Industrial Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 -38.0% -37.2% 1.3% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Com) 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.0% 100.0% 3.4% Lawn and Garden Equipment (Res) 0.00 0.00 0.00 -1.8% 5.8% 7.8% Logging Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% Pleasure Craft 0.03 0.01 0.01 -62.5% -78.4% -42.4% Railroad Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 -100.0% -100.0% 0.0% Recreational Equipment 0.01 0.01 0.01 8.3% 8.4% 0.1% Grand Total 0.12 0.13 0.13 13.8% 9.5% -3.8% % Difference by Category % Difference by Category

% Difference by Category

% Difference by Category

% Difference by Category NOx Emissions - All Categories

0 0.5

1 1.5

2 2.5

NR04 NR05a NR05d

Total VOC Emissions - All Categories

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

1 1.2

NR04 NR05a NR05d

CO Emissions - All Categories

0 2 4 6 8 10

NR04 NR05a NR05d

Exhaust PM10 Emissions - All Categories

0 0.05 0.1 0.15

NR04 NR05a NR05d

Exhaust PM2.5 Emissions - All Categories

0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14

NR04 NR05a NR05d