alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-11217

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARICELLA FRANKLIN,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:18-CR-77-1

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Maricella Franklin

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Franklin has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 6, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-11217 Document: 00514986442 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/06/2019
No. 18-11217

2

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 18-11217 Document: 00514986442 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/06/2019
#### § 81.12 Inspection of premises.

The producer must permit authorized representatives of USDA or the Committee, at any reasonable time, to have access to their premises to inspect and examine the orchard block where trees were removed and records pertaining to the orchard to determine compliance with the provisions of this part.
PUBLIC LAW 107–257—OCT. 29, 2002 116 STAT. 1737

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1270 (H.R. 2672)

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 107–428 accompanying H.R. 2672 (Comm. on Transporation

and Infrastructure).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:

Vol. 147 (2001): Nov. 15, considered and passed Senate.

Vol. 148 (2002): Oct. 16, considered and passed House.

Æ

Public Law 107–257

107th Congress

An Act

To designate the United States courthouse to be constructed at 8th Avenue and

Mill Street in Eugene, Oregon, as the ‘‘Wayne Lyman Morse United States Courthouse’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF WAYNE LYMAN MORSE UNITED STATES

COURTHOUSE.

The United States courthouse to be constructed at 8th Avenue

and Mill Street in Eugene, Oregon, shall be known and designated

as the ‘‘Wayne Lyman Morse United States Courthouse’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the United States courthouse

referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the

Wayne Lyman Morse United States Courthouse.

Approved October 29, 2002.

Oct. 29, 2002

[S. 1270]
## AV **ITERA**

**Cardinal SE NOVA**  **CRON FN/W/S, 60°C isothermal**

**0.99 RD**



### Time (min) **E% F%**  **E% F%** 

measured on the graph

**Process** 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

0.0

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100**F i** **x a** **t i** **o n** **( %** **) E** **x h** **a u** **s t** **( %** **)**

**Ti me (min)** 

## NOVACRON **FN/W/S, 60 °**  **C isothermal**
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, *

*

*

v. * CASE NO. 2:06MJ75.DRB

*

RONALD MCQUEEN *

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

Comes now the undersigned counsel and enters his appearance in this cause as Counsel for

Ronald McQueen.

Respectfully submitted,

s/Susan G. James

SUSAN G. JAMES

Attorney at Law

600 South McDonough Street

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Phone: (334) 269-3330

Fax: (334) 834-0353

E-mail: sgjamesandassoc@aol.com

Bar No: JAM012

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 3, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk

of Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following: 

United States Attorney

P.O. Box 197

Montgomery, Alabama, 36101

Case 2:06-mj-00075-DRB Document 10 Filed 08/03/2006 Page 1 of 2
Respectfully submitted,

s/Susan G. James

SUSAN G. JAMES

Attorney at Law

600 South McDonough Street

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Phone: (334) 269-3330

Fax: (334) 834-0353

E-mail: sgjamesandassoc@aol.com

Bar No: JAM012

Case 2:06-mj-00075-DRB Document 10 Filed 08/03/2006 Page 2 of 2
#### § 81.2 Administration.

The program will be administered under the direction and supervision of the Deputy Administrator, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS), United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), and will be implemented by the Prune Marketing Committee (Committee). The Committee, or its authorized representatives, does not have authority to modify or waive any of the provisions of this subpart. Such power shall rest solely with the Administrator of AMS, or delegatee. The Administator or delegatee, in the Administrator's or delegatee's sole discretion can modify deadlines or other conditions, as needed or appropriate to serve the goals of the program. In all cases, payments under this part are subject to the availability of funds.
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 6 Filed 07/31/2006 Page 1 of 1
5139.7602 Policy and Responsibilities.

(1) Contracting Officers are responsible to ensure that Purchase Request Packages for NEW

Contracts include a PWS with the approved/standard language in accordance with 5111.106 unless a

waiver approved by ECMA is included. The standard language is provided in Appendix HH. The

waiver must be filed in the official contract file. This includes follow-on contracts.

(2) Contracting Officers are responsible to ensure Purchase Request Packages for Exercising an

Option on an Existing Contracts are coordinated with ECMA IAW 5111.106. The coordination

document shall be filed in the contract file.

(3) Contracting Officers are responsible to ensure Purchase Request Packages for issuing a New

Order against an Existing Contract are coordinated with ECMA IAW 5111.106. The coordination

documentation shall be filed in the contract file.

(4) For New contracts to Cloud Service Providers, Contracting Officers are responsible to ensure

maximum use of the Common and Data Service Descriptions as defined by ECMA in the Army Cloud

Plan and issued to Contracting by DASA(P). See Appendix HH.

(5) For New contracts for Cloud Migration, Hosting, and Managed Services, Contracting Officers

and requiring actitivies will maxmize use of the CLIN/SLIN descriptions. See Appendix HH.

Parent topic: Subpart 5139.76 - Cloud Computing
Amendment to Employment Agreement, Matt Maddox



 EXHIBIT 10.3 
 AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment to Employment Agreement is by and between Matt Maddox
(“Employee”) and Wynn Resorts, Limited (“Employer”). 
 WHEREAS, Employee and Employer have entered in to that certain Employment
Agreement dated as of October 1, 2005, as amended (the “Employment Agreement”); 
 WHEREAS, due to the ongoing negative economic climate,
Employee and Employer desire to amend the Employment Agreement in order to assist Employer to maintain business stability thereby preserving Employee’s employment. 
 NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Amendment to Base Salary. Effective February 16, 2009, the term “Base Salary” shall be mean $552,500 per annum. 

  

	 	2.	Other Provisions of Agreement. The parties acknowledge that the Employment Agreement is being modified only as stated herein, and agree that nothing else in the Employment
Agreement shall be affected by this Amendment. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be
executed as of the date below. 
  

							
	WYNN RESORTS, LIMITED	 		 	EMPLOYEE
			
	 /s/ Marc Schorr
	 		 	 /s/ Matt Maddox
 Matt
Maddox

				
	 By:
	 	 Marc Schorr
	 		 	 Date:  February 13, 2009

				
	 Its:
	 	 COO
§ 930.170 Sales and inventory report. ( a ) Handlers shall submit to the Board a sales and inventory report for the reporting period ending November 30, February 28, May 31, and June 30 of each crop year. Handlers shall file such reports by the tenth day of the month following the reporting period, December 10, March 10, June 10, and July 10, respectively. Should the filing due date fall on a Saturday, Sunday, or federal holiday, reports are due by the first business day following the due date. Such reports shall be reported to the Board on CIAB Form 3 and include: ( 1 ) The name, address, telephone number, and identifying number of the handler;
( 2 ) The reporting period covered by the report;
( 3 ) The form, type, and unit size for each product;
( 4 ) The total beginning of year inventory for each product;
( 5 ) The packed amount for each product;
( 6 ) Total inter-handler transfers, and total volume repackaged or remanufactured for each product, year-to-date;
( 7 ) Total sales outside the industry for each product, year-to-date;
( 8 ) The amount of ending inventory for each product, year-to-date;
( 9 ) List of inter-handler transfers, both in and out, during the reporting period including: ( i ) Name of the selling handler;
( ii ) Name of the receiving handler; and
( iii ) Form, type, number of units.
( 10 ) List of repacks and remanufactures during the reporting period including: ( i ) Form, type, and number of units of source products; and
( ii ) Form, type, and number of units of end products.
( b ) The amount of inventory for each product over 5 years old shall be reported annually on the sales and inventory report for the reporting period ending May 31. Product age is based on the crop year in which the current product was processed or remanufactured.
[86 FR 72147, Dec. 21, 2021]
Exhibit 33.2
                                  ------------




          ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA



The Bank of New York and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N. A.
(collectively, the "Company") provides this platform-level assessment of
compliance with the servicing criteria specified in Item 1122(d) of Regulation
AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Management has determined that the following servicing criteria are applicable
in regards to the following servicing platform for the following period:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially
required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential
mortgage-backed securities and other mortgage-related asset-backed securities
issued on or after January 1, 2006 (and like-kind transactions issued prior to
January 1, 2006) for which the Company provides trustee, securities
administration, paying agent or custodial services. The platform includes like
kind transactions for which the Company provided trustee, securities
administrator, paying agent or custodial services as a result of the Company's
acquisition as of October 1, 2006 of portions of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s
corporate trust business, including structured finance agency and trust
transactions.

Applicable Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d), to the extent required by the related transaction agreements as to
any transaction, except for the following criteria: 1122 (d) (1)(ii), (iii),
(iv), (4) (iv), (v), (vi), (vii), (viii), (ix), (x), (xi), (xii) and (xiii).

Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2006.

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the
following assessment of compliance in respect of the Applicable Servicing
Criteria:

o  The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria.

o  The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

o  As of December 31, 2006 and for the Period, the Company was in material
compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.



                                      1
<PAGE>


Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has
issued an attestation report with respect to the Company's foregoing
assessment of compliance.



      The Bank of New York                    The Bank of New York
      The Bank of New York Trust              The Bank of New York Trust
         Company, N.A.                           Company, N.A.


      /s/ Robert L. Griffin                   /s/ Patrick J. Tadie
      ---------------------------             ---------------------------
      Robert L. Griffin                       Patrick J. Tadie
      Authorized Signer                       Authorized Signer


March 1, 2007



                                      2
Exhibit 32.2






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Golden Star Resource Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Marilyn Miller , Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated this 13th day of October, 2009.




/s/ MARILYN MILLERMarilyn MillerChief Financial Officer
§ 905.14 Redistricting. ( a ) The Committee may, with the approval of the Secretary, redefine the districts into which the production area is divided or reapportion or otherwise change the grower membership of districts, or both: *Provided,* That the membership shall consist of 10 grower members, and any such change shall be based, insofar as practicable, upon the respective averages for the immediately preceding three fiscal periods of: ( 1 ) The number of bearing trees in each district;
( 2 ) The volume of fresh fruit produced in each district;
( 3 ) The total number of acres of citrus in each district; and
( 4 ) Other relevant factors.
( b ) Each redistricting or reapportionment shall be announced on or prior to March 1 preceding the effective fiscal period.
[81 FR 10455, Mar. 1, 2016, as amended at 88 FR 89278, Dec. 27, 2023]
162 So.2d 572

#### Athanese J. JONES et al. v. INDIANA LUMBERMEN’S MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

No. 47190.

April 17, 1964.

In re: Athanese J. Jones and Motors Insurance Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 161 So. 2d 445. '

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal we find no error' of law in its judgment.
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

December 9, 2020

No. 04

- 20

- 00537

- CV

IN RE Phillip RODRIGUEZ

From the 285th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020

- CI

- 12089 Honorable Larry Noll , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena Chapa, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

On November 5 , 2020, relator filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus in which he complained the trial court has refused to rule on and grant his no

- evidence motion for summary judgment. Relator contends he set his summary judgment motion for hearing on September 15,
2020. On November 25, 2020, this court issued an opinion denying the petition on the grounds that relator did not provide this court with any record and he did not establish that a two

- month delay in ruling was unreasonable.

On November 30, 2020, relator filed a motion for reconsideration stating that two months
have now passed since he filed his no

- evidence motion for summary judgment and this court should reconsider our November 25, 2020 ruling. Relator also filed a copy of his request to the
trial court clerk in which he requested certain pleadings that would supp ort his request for
mandamus relief.

In addition to providing this court with a record showing the motion at issue was properly
filed and the trial court was made aware of the motion, relator must also establish that the motion has not been ruled on by t he trial court for an unreasonable period of time. See In re Mendoza

, 131 S.W.3d 167, 167

- 68 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2004, orig. proceeding). T he temporal

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2020

- CI

- 12089 , styled Philip Rodriguez v. H.E.B. Grocery Store, L.P., e t al

. , pending in the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Larry Noll presiding.requirement on a trial court to rule on a pending motion is only that the judge rule within a

“reason able time.” In re Chavez , 62 S.W.3d 225, 228 (Tex. App.

— Amarillo 2001, orig. proceeding); In re Ramirez , 994 S.W.2d 682, 683 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1998, orig. proceeding). Whether such a period has lapsed is dependent upon the circumstances of each

case. Chavez , 62 S.W.3d at 228. Moreover, “no bright

- line demarcates the boundaries of a reasonable time period.” Id. Its scope is dependent upon a myriad of criteria, including the trial court’s actual knowledge of the motion, its overt refusal to rule, the state of the court’s docket, and the existence of other judicial and administrative matters that must be addressed first. Id. at
228

- 29.

Relator’s motion for reconsideration does not establish the trial court has refused to rule for an unreasonable perio d of time. Therefore, relator’s motio n for reconsideration is DENIED without prejudice to relator filing a new petition for writ of mandamus.

It is so ORDERED on December 9, 2020.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

_________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, CLERK OF COURT
Subpart 229.70 - SPECIAL PROCEDURES

FOR OVERSEAS CONTRACTS

To obtain tax relief for overseas contracts, follow the procedures at PGI 229.70.

Parent topic: Part 229 - TAXES
§ 634.22 Application for assistance. ( a ) Landowners or operators must apply for RCWP assistance through the office of the administering agency or its designee(s) by completing the prescribed application form.
( b ) The priority for assistance among landowners and operators in developing water quality plans is to be determined jointly, through an agreed-to process, by the county ASC committee and the soil conservation district, with technical assistance from NRCS.
( c ) Applications that are ineligible or technically infeasible are to be returned to the applicant with a letter stating the reasons for disapproval. Applications that are of a low priority will be retained and the applicant will be sent a notice that the application is being held for a period to be determined locally for future consideration.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 236 (Thursday, December 9, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 76756]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30904]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated July 19, 2010, and published in the Federal 
Register on July 28, 2010, (75 FR 44285), Johnson Matthey 
Pharmaceutical Materials, Inc., Pharmaceuticals Service, 25 Patton 
Road, Devens, Massachusetts 01434, made application by letter to the 
Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk 
manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amphetamine (1100).........................  II
Methylphenidate (1724).....................  II
Nabilone (7379)............................  II
Alfentanil (9737)..........................  II
Sufentanil (9740)..........................  II
Remifentanil (9739)........................  II
Hydrocodone (9193).........................  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to utilize this facility to manufacture small 
quantities of the listed controlled substances in bulk and to conduct 
analytical testing in support of the company's primary manufacturing 
facility in West Deptford, New Jersey. The controlled substances 
manufactured in bulk at this facility will be distributed to the 
company's customers.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of 
Johnson Matthey Pharmaceutical Materials, Inc. to manufacture the 
listed basic classes of controlled substances is consistent with the 
public interest at this time. DEA has investigated Johnson Matthey 
Pharmaceutical Materials, Inc. to ensure that the company's 
registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation 
has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security 
systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local 
laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, 
pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, 
the above named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer 
of the basic classes of controlled substances listed.

    Dated: November 29, 2010.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-30904 Filed 12-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
Part 5625 - FOREIGN ACQUISITION

Subpart 5625.1 - BUY AMERICAN ACT SUPPLIES

5625.103 Exceptions.

Subpart 5625.8 - OTHER INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS AND COORDINATION (Removed August

2017)

Subpart 5625.9 - CUSTOMS AND DUTIES (Removed June 2021)

Subpart 5625.1 - BUY AMERICAN ACT SUPPLIES

5625.103 Exceptions.

Where throughout DFARS 225.103 the approval level is stated as Head of Agency (HOA) or Head of

Contracting Activity (HCA), the approval authority for USSOCOM is the Director of Procurement

(DOP).

Subpart 5625.8 - OTHER INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

AND COORDINATION (Removed August 2017)

Subpart 5625.9 - CUSTOMS AND DUTIES (Removed June

2021)

HQ, United States Special Operations Command

Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L)

SOFARS 5625

February 2007
Part 5623 - ENVIRONMENT,

CONSERVATION, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY,

AND DRUGFREE WORKPLACE

Subpart 5623.4 - Use of Recovered Materials

5623.404 Agency Affirmative Procurement Programs.

5623.405 Procedures.

Subpart 5623.4 - Use of Recovered Materials

5623.404 Agency Affirmative Procurement Programs.

(Revised February 2007 )

(a) Each contracting office shall refer to the Affirmative Procurement Plan (APP) (i.e. Green

Procurement Plan (GPP)) of its host base for guidance on the promotion, compliance, and preference

for use of recovered materials. Web sites for Army, Air Force, and Navy APPs can be found in the

USSOCOM Desktop Resource Center (DCG).

(c) The Defense Acquisition University Government Purchase Card (GPC) tutorial provides

USSOCOM approving officials and cardholders with guidance on the purchase of EPA-designated

products at or below the micro-purchase threshold as required by FAR.

5623.405 Procedures.

(c) Refer to the USSOCOM DCG for a template of the written justification required by FAR 23.405(b)

(2) .

HQ, United States Special Operations Command

Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L)

SOFARS 5624

February 2007
Part 240 - RESERVED           **Parent topic:** Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation