alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

§ 800.88 Loss of identity. ( a ) *Lots.* Except as noted in paragraph (d) of this section, the indentity of a lot of grain shall be considered lost if ( 1 ) a portion of the grain is unloaded, transferred, or otherwise removed from the carrier or container in which the grain was located at the time of the original inspection; or
( 2 ) a portion of grain or other material, including additives, is added to the lot after the orginal inspection was performed, unless the addition of the additive was performed in accordance with the regulations and the instructions. At the option of official personnel performing a reinspection, appeal inspection, or Board appeal inspection service, the identity of grain in a closed carrier or container shall be considered lost if the carrier or container is not sealed or if the seal record is incomplete.
( b ) *Carriers and containers.* The indentity of a carrier or container shall be considered lost when ( 1 ) the stowage area is cleaned, painted, treated, fumigated, or fitted after the original inspection was performed; or
( 2 ) the identification of the carrier or container has been changed since the original inspection was performed.
( c ) *Submitted samples.* The identity of a submitted sample of grain shall be considered lost when ( 1 ) the identifying number, mark, or symbol for the sample is lost or destroyed or
( 2 ) the samples have not been retained and protected by official personnel as prescribed in the instructions.
( d ) Additives. [1] If additives are applied during loading to outbound, including export, grain after sampling or during unloading to inbound grain before sampling for the purpose of insect or fungi control, dust suppression, or identification, the inspection certificate shall show a statement showing the type and purpose of the additive application, except that no statement is required to be shown when the additive is a fumigant applied for the purpose of insect control.
[52 FR 6495, Mar. 4, 1987, as amended at 58 FR 3212, Jan. 8, 1993; 59 FR 52077, Oct. 14, 1994] Footnotes -
800.88
[1] Elevators, other handlers of grain, and their agents are responsible for the additive's proper usage and application. Compliance with this section does not excuse compliance with applicable Federal, State, and local laws.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JACOB MARTIN CASSELL, JR.,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 116 MM 2020

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of August, 2020, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for 

Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is GRANTED. Counsel is DIRECTED to file the 

already prepared Petition for Allowance of Appeal within 5 days.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Authority:

7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 868.82 Voluntary cancellation or suspension of license.

Upon request by a licensee, the Service may cancel a license or suspend a license for a period of time not to exceed 1 year. A license that has been voluntarily suspended shall be returned by the Service upon request by the licensee within 1 year, subject to the provisions of § 868.81(a) and (b); a license that has been cancelled shall be considered void and shall not be subject to return or renewal.

[53 FR 3722, Feb. 9, 1988. Redesignated and amended at 60 FR 16364, 16365, Mar. 30, 1995]
Exhibit 35.1

                                                          [LOGO] IndymacBank(SM)


                       REG AB 1123 Statement of Compliance

I am an authorized officer for IndyMac Bank, F.S.B, the servicer for the
transaction listed below and I certify:

a)    A review of IndyMac Bank's activities during the reporting period and of
      its performance under the applicable servicing agreement has been made
      under my supervision.

b)    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, except as set forth
      below IndyMac Bank has fulfilled all of its obligations under the
      agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.

c)    None


                                By: /s/ Robert M. Abramian
                                    ----------------------
                                    Robert M. Abramian
                                    First Vice President
                                    Home Loan Servicing
                                    Investor Reporting
                                    Indymac Bank


                                By: /s/ Barbara Perez
                                    ----------------------
                                    Barbara Perez
                                    Senior Vice President
                                    Indymac Bank



Prepared for:   Deutsche Bank

Date:           February 28, 2007

Ref:            683 - INABS 2006-D (UBS)



                                                             www.indymacbank.com


             460 Sierra Madre Villa Ave., Pasadena, CA 91107   Tel: 626.535.5555
<PAGE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3054 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3054

       To suspend temporarily the duty on synthetic staple fiber.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

  Mr. Carper introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on synthetic staple fiber.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SYNTHETIC STAPLE FIBER.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.55.06        Synthetic staple fiber  Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           of polyester;                                                     31/2009          ''
                           cruciform                                                                           .
                           (tetralobal) cross
                           section, measuring
                           less than 3.3
                           decitex, carded,
                           combed or prepared
                           for spinning
                           (provided for in
                           subheading
                           5506.20.00)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
P.1 

OAR Box 1830 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

85) IV-C-51 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 11/13/2008 7:20:55 AM Sheet 85 of 232 
P.2 

^tr% 

4? 

KM* 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

< WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

FEB 2 W 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

Honorable Alan J. Dixon 

United States Senate 

Washington, D.c. 20510 

Dear Senator Dixon: 

Thank you for passing along the comments of your 

constituents concerning EPA's proposal to require onboard 

refueling emission controls and proposed gasoline volatility 

regulations. Be assured that these comments will be considered 

in the next phase of our rulemaking process. We will also be 

placing them in the public dockets for the rulemaking. 

Thank you again for your concern in this matter. 

Sincerely yours, 

^"W l SIGNED BY 

RICHARD D. WILSON 

Richard D. Wilson 

Director, Office of Mobile Sources 

c c : Docket A-87-11 

Docket A-85-21 

Prepared by: Form Letter:sal:1/28/88:AL880350 - ECTD, Ann Arbor, MI 

bcc: Region 05 

Congressional Liaison/Quinn
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3008 

To suspend temporarily the duty on preformed pellets of a mixture of sodium 

iodide, thallium iodide, dysprosium tri-iodide, holmium tri-iodide, thulium 

tri-iodide, and sometimes calcium iodide. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 24, 2006 

Mr. REID (for Mr. ROCKEFELLER) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on preformed pellets of 

a mixture of sodium iodide, thallium iodide, dysprosium 

tri-iodide, holmium tri-iodide, thulium tri-iodide, and 

sometimes calcium iodide. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•S 3008 IS 

1 SECTION 1. PREFORMED PELLETS OF A MIXTURE OF SO2 DIUM IODIDE, THALLIUM IODIDE, DYSPRO3 SIUM TRI-IODIDE, HOLMIUM TRI-IODIDE, 

4 THULIUM TRI-IODIDE, AND SOMETIMES CAL5 CIUM IODIDE. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of Chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.28.27 Preformed pellets of a mixture of sodium iodide, thallium iodide, dysprosium triiodide, holmium tri-iodide, 

thulium tri-iodide, and sometimes calcium iodide (CAS 

Nos. 7681–82–5, 7790–30– 

9, 15474–63–2, 13813–41– 

7, 1381–43–9, or 10102– 

68–8) (provided for in subheading 2827.60.50) ............ Free No Change No Change On or Before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

11 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

12 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

13 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
#### In the Matter of Arthur Zimtbaum, Respondent, v. Milton Glass et al., Constituting the Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York, Appellants.

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR to review appellants’ determination denying petitioner’s application for a zoning variance, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated February 5, 1968, which annulled the determination and directed appellants to grant the variance. Judgment reversed, on the law, with costs, and matter remanded to appellants for further proceedings in accordance herewith: In order for appellants to grant a variance, a petitioner has to satisfy certain requirements specified in section 72-21 of the Zoning Resolution of the City of Hew York. Among these requirements, three in particular are the most important: (1) there must be unique physical conditions peculiar to and inherent in the particular premises which are not due to general conditions in the neighborhood; (2) because of these unique conditions, the land in question cannot yield a reasonable return if used only for the permitted purpose; and (3) the variance, if granted, must not alter the essential character of the area (see *Matter of Otto*v. *Steinhilber,*282 N. Y. 71, 76). In our opinion, petitioner did not comply (1) with the second requirement, because he failed to demonstrate that the property in question cannot yield a reasonable return if used, not only for residences, but for any and all permitted purposes under the existing zoning resolution (see *Matter of Forrest*v. *Evershed,*7 N Y 2d 256, 262; *Matter of Crossroads Recreation*v. *Broz,*4 N Y 2d 39, 45, 46), and (2) with the third requirement, because he failed to demonstrate adequately that the proposed warehouse would not materially alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Accordingly, Special Term erred in determining that appellants acted arbitrarily and discriminatorily in failing to grant the variance. Moreover, if, as appellants assert, petitioner’s property is seven blocks further away from Kennedy Airport than that of the petitioner in *Matter of Mays (Glass)*(N Y. L. J., Feb. 16, 1968, p. 19, col. 5), and in addition, the property in *Mays*was across the street from a manufacturing zone, we could not agree with Special Term that there was no material difference between the application in *Mays*and the one at bar (cf. *Matter of Crossroads Recreation*v. *Broz, supra,*pp. 46-47; *Matter of Larkin Co.*v. *Schwab,*242 N. Y. 330, 336). The proceeding is therefore remanded so that petitioner, if he be so advised, can *790resubmit Ms proof in accordance with the foregoing. Rabin, Acting P. J., Benjamin, Munder, Martuscello and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-QSB
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         289,478
<SECURITIES>                                 2,222,247
<RECEIVABLES>                                   70,578
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,582,303
<PP&E>                                          24,034
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,606,337
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              224
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        36,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,570,113
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,606,337
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                35,634
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (35,634)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (35,634)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (35,634)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3057 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3057

   To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on 4,4'-Oxydianiline.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

  Mr. DeWine introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on 4,4'-Oxydianiline.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 4,4'-OXYDIANILINE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.05.12 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 4,4'-Oxydianiline) is 
amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
###### Editorial Note on [Subchapter A of Chapter VIII](/current/title-7/chapter-VIII/subchapter-A)

#### Authority:

[7 U.S.C. 71-87K](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/7/71), [1621-1627](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/7/1621).

###### Editorial Note on [Subchapter A of Chapter VIII](/current/title-7/chapter-VIII/subchapter-A)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at [84 FR 45645](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/84-FR-45645), Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 801.8 Tolerances for sieves.

The maintenance tolerances for sieves used in performing official inspection services shall be:

(a) Thickness of metal: ±0.0015 inch.

(b) Accuracy of perforation: ±0.001 inch from design specification.

(c) Sieving accuracy:

| Sieve description | Tolerance | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Direct comparison | Sample exchange |
| .064 × 3/8 inch oblong | ±0.2 percent, mean deviation from standard sieve using wheat | ±0.3 percent, mean deviation from standard sieve using wheat |
| 5/64 × 3/4 inch slotted | ±0.3 percent, mean deviation from standard sieve using barley | ±0.5 percent, mean deviation from standard sieve using barley |
| 55/64 × 3/4 inch slotted | ±0.5 percent, mean deviation from standard sieve using barley | ±0.7 percent, mean deviation from standard sieve using barley |
| 6/64 × 3/4 inch slotted | ±0.7 percent, mean deviation from standard sieve using barley | ±1.0 percent, mean deviation from standard sieve using barley |
#### BARRY v. MULHALL.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

April 9, 1914.)

Action by Richard Barry against Martin M. Mulhall.

No opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, unless appellant comply with terms stated in order. Order filed. See, also, 147 N. Y. Supp. 996.
#### § 915.9 Handler.

*Handler* is synonymous with shipper and means any person (except a common or contract carrier transporting avocados owned by another person) who handles avocados or causes avocados to be handled.
1 The Honorable Stephen M. Reasoner, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 01-3491

___________ Phillips Development Corporation; * College Heights, LLC, * * Appellants, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Arkansas. Conagra, Inc.; Swift-Ekrich, Inc., * doing business as Butterball * [UNPUBLISHED] Turkey Company, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: June 28, 2002 Filed: July 24, 2002

___________ Before BOWMAN, BEAM, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Phillips Development Corporation appeals the district court's 1 grant of summary judgment in favor of Conagra, Inc., and its subsidiary, Swift-Ekrich, Inc. d/b/a Butterball Turkey Company, on Phillips's suit for breach of contract and-2- promissory estoppel. Phillips alleges that Conagra and Swift-Ekrich promised to subsidize rent payments for a housing complex Phillips constructed near a Butterball Turkey plant in Huntsville, Arkansas. The district court granted summary judgment after concluding the alleged promises were too indefinite to be enforceable. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude the district court's rulings were proper. We thus affirm on the basis of the district court's opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3093 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3093

    To suspend temporarily the duty on M. Torres multi-axis routing 
               machines with universal holding fixtures.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

 Mr. Brownback introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on M. Torres multi-axis routing 
               machines with universal holding fixtures.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. M. TORRES MULTI-AXIS ROUTING MACHINES WITH UNIVERSAL HOLDING 
              FIXTURES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.84.59        M. Torres multi-axis    Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           routing machines with                                             31/2009          ''
                           universal holding                                                                   .
                           fixtures (provided
                           for in subheading
                           8459.61.00)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Celia D. Goodman, Appellant, v Solack Estates, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered January 17, 1980, staying proceedings in the action pending decision in a separate declaratory judgment action, dismissed as moot, without costs. Concur—Fein, J. P., Sandler, Sullivan, Bloom and Carro, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Stanley Harwood, as Commissioner of Elections of the County of Nassau, Plaintiff, v Isabel R. Dodd, as Commissioner of Elections of the County of Nassau, Defendant.

Cross motions by the parties for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals. Cross motion by defendant granted. Cross motion by plaintiff denied as unnecessary. Questions of law have arisen which in our opinion ought to be reviewed. Lazer, J. P., Cohalan, Martuscello and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

KEITH LAWSON, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 3:06-CV-641-WKW

)

CITY OF ALEXANDER CITY, et. al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File Stipulation of

Dismissal (Doc. # 20), it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. The parties shall file their

joint stipulation of dismissal on or before September 27, 2007.

Done this 17th day of September, 2007.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00641-WKW-TFM Document 21 Filed 09/17/2007 Page 1 of 1