alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
242.002 Interagency agreements.

(b)(i) DoD requires reimbursement, at a rate set by the Under Secretary of Defense

(Comptroller/Chief Financial Officer), from non-DoD organizations, except for—

(A) Quality assurance, contract administration, and audit services provided under a no-charge

reciprocal agreement;

(B) Services performed under subcontracts awarded by the Small Business Administration under

FAR Subpart 19.8; and

(C) Quality assurance performed for the Canadian Department of National Defence and pricing

services performed for Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC), operating as

Public Services and Procurement Canada (PSPC).

(ii) Departments and agencies may request an exception from the reimbursement policy in

paragraph (b)(i) of this section from the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller/Chief Financial

Officer). A request must show that an exception is in the best interest of the Government.

(iii) Departments and agencies must pay for services performed by non-DoD activities, foreign

governments, or international organizations, unless otherwise provided by reciprocal agreements.

(S-70)(i) Foreign governments and international organizations may request contract administration

services on their direct purchases from U.S. producers. Direct purchase is the purchase of defense

supplies in the United States through commercial channels for use by the foreign government or

international organization.

(ii) PWGSC, operating as PSPC, is permitted to submit its requests for contract administration

services directly to the cognizant contract administration office.

(iii) Other foreign governments (including Canadian government organizations other than PSPC and

international organizations send their requests for contract administration services to the DoD

Central Control Point (CCP) at the Headquarters, Defense Contract Management Agency,

International and Federal Business Team. Contract administration offices provide services only upon

request from the CCP. The CCP shall follow the procedures at PGI 242.002 (S-70)(iii).

Parent topic: Part 242 - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA OF

NORTHERN DIVISION

RALPH BROWN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-642-MEF

)

CHAMPION ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the defendant's Motion to Strike (Doc. #11) filed on September

7, 2006, it is hereby 

ORDERED that the motion is DENIED as moot.. 

DONE this the 18th day of December, 2007.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 46 Filed 12/18/2007 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 31.1

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(D)/15D-14(D)
                  UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
I, Anthony N. Renzi, certify that:
1. I have  reviewed  this  report  on Form  10-K and all  reports  on Form  10-D
   required to be filed in respect of the period  covered by this report on Form
   10-K of RASC Series 2006-EMX8 Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");
2. Based on my knowledge,  the Exchange Act periodic reports,  taken as a whole,
   do not contain  any untrue  statement  of a material  fact or omit to state a
   material  fact  necessary  to make  the  statements  made,  in  light  of the
   circumstances  under which such  statements  were made, not  misleading  with
   respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based  on  my  knowledge,  all  of  the  distribution,  servicing  and  other
   information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
   this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities  performed by the servicers and
   based on my knowledge and the compliance  reviews  conducted in preparing the
   servicer  compliance  statements  required in this report  under Item 1123 of
   Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic  reports,
   the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements
   in all material respects; and
5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance  with  servicing  criteria for
   asset-backed  securities and their related  attestation reports on assessment
   of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to
   be included in this report in accordance  with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
   Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
   report,  except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
   of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report
   on Form 10-K.

In giving the  certifications  above,  I have  reasonably  relied on information
provided to me by the following  unaffiliated parties:  Mortgage Lenders Network
USA, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association.


Date:  March 26, 2007

By:   /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      --------------------
      Name: Anthony N. Renzi
      Title: Managing Director
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3076 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 5-Chloro-1-indanone (EK179). 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. SESSIONS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 5-Chloro-1-indanone 

(EK179). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 5-CHLORO-1-INDANONE (EK179). 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.12.44 5-Chloro-1-indanone (CAS 

No. 42348–86–7) (provided 

for in subheading 

2914.39.90) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


wwhite on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
2 

•S 3076 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwhite on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 7151]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3073]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement: [75 FR 6431, 
February 9, 2010]

Status: Closed meeting.

Place: 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC.

Date and Time of Previously Announced Meeting: Thursday, February 11, 
2010 at 2 p.m.

Change in the Meeting: Cancellation of meeting.
    The Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, February 11, 2010 at 2 
p.m. has been cancelled.
    For further information please contact the Office of the Secretary 
at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: February 10, 2010.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-3073 Filed 2-12-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Exhibit 32.1





Obagi Medical Products, Inc.


CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Obagi Medical Products, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Albert F. Hummel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: April 24, 2013
By:
/s/ Albert F. HummelAlbert F. HummelChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       5
       
<S>				<C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>			6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Nov-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>			May-31-1997
<CASH>				1,967,153
<SECURITIES>                    000
<RECEIVABLES>			000	
<ALLOWANCES>			000
<INVENTORY>			000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                000
<PP&E>				25,905,715
<DEPRECIATION>			10,476,730
<TOTAL-ASSETS>			17,851,957
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>		894,719
<BONDS>				6,243,134
<COMMON>                        000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>		000
<PREFERRED>                     000
<OTHER-SE>                      10,714,104
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>	17,851,957
<SALES>				1,836,941
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                1,920,624
<CGS>				000
<TOTAL-COSTS>			1,014,697
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                530,981
<LOSS-PROVISION>                000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>		243,192
<INCOME-PRETAX>			2,714,395
<INCOME-TAX>			000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>		000
<DISCONTINUED>			000
<EXTRAORDINARY>			000
<CHANGES>                       000
<NET-INCOME>			2,714,395
<EPS-PRIMARY>			47.10
<EPS-DILUTED>			47.10
        

</TABLE>
#### Marilyn M. Clurman, Appellant, v Richard M. Clurman, Respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered June 7, 1979, denying plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment for alimony arrears for the years 1974, 1976, 1977 and 1978, and granting defendant’s cross motion to compel arbitration as to alimony arrears for eight months of 1977 and for 1978, modified, on the law, to the extent of denying the cross motion to compel arbitration and otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The parties entered into a separation agreement in 1956. They were divorced later that year and the separation agreement was incorporated in the divorce decree. Paragraph 4(b) of the agreement provided for payment of alimony of $4,500 annually, plus one third of the amount by which the defendant’s income exceeded $18,000. The agreement provided for arbitration of any controversies arising under paragraph 4(b). This action was commenced in August, 1976 to enforce the alimony provisions and agreed upon by the parties. Plaintiff moved for partial summary judgment for the sums of $188 for the year 1974; $48,333.33 for the year 1976; $59,089.83 for the year 1977; and $3,833.33 for the year 1978. The defendant in opposition produces his own computations, providing various alternatives as to amounts due, depending on how "income” is defined. He claims, however, that all this should be submitted to arbitration. The motion of the defendant to compel arbitration as to the sums due in 1977 and 1978 was made in February, 1979 after having participated in this litigation since 1976. The amounts sought for that year were added by the plaintiff as an amendment to the *ad damnum*clause, and we find that the defendant by his continued participation in this same litigation has waived any right to arbitrate. However, in view of the sharp dispute as to the amounts due to plaintiff, we agree with Special Term’s determination denying plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Lane, Lupiano and Lynch, JJ.; Kupferman, J., dissents in part and would affirm.
5604.7107 Contract Accounting

Classification Reference Number (ACRN).

(a)

(1) Contracts, task orders, and delivery orders under indefinite delivery contracts or basic ordering

agreements, must not contain more than one fund cite from the same congressional funding line

except as provided in Paragraph (2).

(2) Multiple fund cites from the same congressional funding line may be used in situations where it

is needed to comply with one of the following requirements:

(i) Congressionally mandated reporting requirements contained in regulation or congressional

committee reports.

(ii) Information specifically required in the DOD Financial Management Regulation.

(iii) Information specifically required in a Program Objective Memorandum or budget guidance

signed by the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) (USD(C)), or the Director Program Analysis

and Evaluation.

(iv) Information identified in writing by the USD(C) as necessary to prepare the department's annual

audited financial statements.

(v) Information required by the Office of Management and Budget, Department of Treasury, or other

federal agency when the requirement is contained in a signed policy directive issued by the

applicable agency.

(3) Use of multiple fund cites not falling within the requirements of paragraph (2) above must be

approved by the Commander, United States Special Operations Command, and the Director of

Defense Procurement, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition & Technology). This

authority must not be delegated. Request for approval must be submitted through the Director of

Procurement (DOP). The approval document must be included in the contract file.

HQ, United States Special Operations Command

Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L)

SOFARS 5604

February 2007

Parent topic: Subpart 5604.71 - UNIFORM CONTRACT LINE ITEM NUMBERING SYSTEM
```
**Farmer Direct Marketing Bibliography - 2001**
```

```
Due to the length of the bibliography (approximately 60 pages), it has been
divided into categories. Please click on the section of interest to view individual entries.

Full Print version ordering instructions
```

```
Click here to download the entire document (a Word .doc file)
```

```
Click here to download the entire document (.pdf file)**
```

```
*(This file is in Adobe Acrobat [PDF] format. Visit the Adobe Acrobat Website,**if you need to download the adobe acrobat reader used to view PDF files.)*
____________________________________________________________________________
Acknowledgments
```

Executive Summary

Introductory Notes

1. Publications on Direct Marketing byWholesale and Alternative Markets (USDA)

2. Report/Guides for Establishment andOperation of a Farmers Market

3. Reports/Guides on Direct Marketing

4. Producer/VendorSurvey and Analysis

5. Consumer Surveys and Analyses

6. Roadside Farm Stands

7. Pick-Your-Own Operations

8. Community Supported Agriculture (CSA)

9. Farm to School

10. InternetMarketing

11. Specific MarketStudies

12. How to Get fromthe Farm and Kitchen to a Direct Market

13. Hints forImproved Direct Marketing

14. Quality and FoodSafety for Direct Marketers

15. Marketing Plansand Research Guides

16. Small FarmIssues Relating to Direct Marketing

17. ProductionIssues

18. Small BusinessPlanning and Manuals

19. USDAPrograms:  Farmers Market Nutrition Coupons:  The Special SupplementalNutrition Programfor Women, Infants, and Children (WIC); and Food Stamps

20. Lower Income andInner-City Direct Market Customers

21. Legal Issues

22. Of Interest to Consumers

23. ATTRA (AppropriateTechnology Transfer for Rural Areas) Publications

24. Information Resources

25. Periodicals

26. Miscellaneous

Return to Publications
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3031 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain articles of platinum. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 24, 2006 

Mr. DEWINE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain articles of 

platinum. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN ARTICLES OF PLATINUM. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.71.15 Certain platinum spheres, of a kind used 

in the electrodes of spark plugs (provided 

for in subheading 7115.90.60) ................ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 3031 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
Description of an EPA Significant Guidance Document 

7/24/2007 

EPA maintains a list of Significant Guidance Documents at 

http://www.epa.gov/regulations/guidance/ as called for by the Office of Management and 

Budget’s (OMB) Final Bulletin for Agency Good Guidance Practices 

(http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/memoranda/fy2007/m07-07.pdf). Please be aware that 

the EPA list of Significant Guidance Documents does not include every guidance 

document issued by EPA and only encompasses those documents that are "significant" as 

defined by OMB’s Bulletin. 

This final document has been determined to be an EPA Significant Guidance 

Document per the OMB Bulletin definition and is included on the EPA list of significant 

guidance documents. OMB’s Bulletin directs agencies to allow for the public to submit 

comments on any Significant Guidance Document that appears on the agency’s list of 

significant guidance documents. EPA allows for public comments to be submitted 

through the Agency’s electronic docket and commenting system at 

http://www.regulations.gov. 

Please note that although you may receive an acknowledgement that EPA has 

received your comment, you may not receive a detailed response to your comment. Your 

feedback is nevertheless important to the EPA and will be forwarded to the appropriate 

program staff for consideration.
162 So.2d 14

#### A. M. MERRITT v. BOSSIER PARISH POLICE JURY.

No. 47185.

April 1, 1964.

In re: A. M. Merritt applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Bossier. 160 So.2d 232.

Writ refused. There appears no error of law in the judgment complained of.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

I, James W. Dolan, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MAI SystemsCorporation;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisquarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

 

a)              designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;

 

b)             evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of adate within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “EvaluationDate”); and

 

c)              presented in thisquarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):

 

a)              all significantdeficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which couldadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors anymaterial weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b)             any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 

6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated inthis quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internalcontrols or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controlssubsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any correctiveactions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

 
| Date: November 18, 2005 | By:    |   /s/    James W. Dolan       |   |
|-------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                    |   |   James W. Dolan                        |
|                    |   |   Chief Financial and Operating Officer |

 

----
#### The People of the State of New York *v.*Merchants’ Bank. William H. Kimball, as Receiver, etc., *v.*Willard Ives et al.

(Argued April 29, 1884;

decided May 6, 1884.)

*P. 0. Williams*for appellants.

*Hannibal Smith*for respondents.

Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion.

All concur.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 10.27


AMENDMENT NO. 2
TO
EQUIFAX 2005 EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
(As Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2015)




THIS AMENDMENT made as of this 16th day of February, 2018, by EQUIFAX INC. (the “Company”);


W I T N E S S E T H:


WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Equifax 2005 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, which plan was amended and restated effective as of January 1, 2015 (the “Plan”);


WHEREAS, the Company previously adopted an Amendment No. 2 to the Plan dated August 24, 2017, which the Company desires to replace in its entirety with this amendment;


WHEREAS, the Company now desires to amend the Plan to clarify that a Supplemental Retirement Contribution shall be made only with respect to the portion of Base Salary and Bonus earned during the period the Eligible Executive participates in the Supplemental Retirement Contribution portion of the Plan;


NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:


1.


Amendment No. 2 previously adopted on August 24, 2017 is hereby revoked and deleted in its entirety.


2.


Section A.1 of Appendix A to the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the first sentence of such Section and substituting the following therefor.


“Unless otherwise determined by the Employer (for any Plan Year or from time to time), the annual Supplemental Retirement Contribution for a designated Eligible Executive will be equal to ten percent (10%) of the sum of (i) the Eligible Executive’s Base Salary earned for the Plan Year and (ii) the Bonus earned by the Eligible Executive for the Plan Year.  If an Eligible Executive becomes or ceases to be eligible to receive Supplemental Retirement Contributions during a Plan Year, the Supplemental Retirement Contributions will be based only on the Base Salary and Bonus earned while the Eligible Executive was eligible to receive Supplemental Retirement Contributions.  The Employer shall have full discretion in determining the amount of Base Salary and Bonus earned for any period.”


3.


This Amendment No. 2 shall be effective as of the date hereof.  Except as hereby modified, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed this Amendment No. 2 as of the date first written above.


EQUIFAX INC.




By:     /s/ Coretha M. Rushing            
Coretha M. Rushing
Chief Human Resources Officer