IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

VFS LEASING CO. )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

vs. ) 3:06cv638-SRW

)

G.F. KELLY, INC. cl/b/a KELLY )

TRUCKING; and GUY KELLY, )

)

Defendants )

EVIDENTIARY SUBMISSION IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Comes now Plaintiff VFS Leasing Co. and submits the following evidence in support of

its Motion for Summary Judgment being filed contemporaneously herewith:

A. Declaration ofMichael J. Cox;

B. Declaration of Keith Weachter;

C. Deposition ofGuy F. Kelly and relevant exhibits;

D. Price Comparison Chart;

Respectfully submitted this 30th day ofApril, 2007.

s/ David B. Hall

DAVID B. HALL (HALO52)

JULIE A. COTTINGHAM (COTO17)

Attorneys for Plaintiff VFS Leasing Co.

B JAC2 745481 vi

I 039265-000044 4/30/2007

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 1 of 2
OF COUNSEL:

BAKER DONELSON, BEARMAN

CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ

A Professional Corporation

420 North 20th Street

Suite 1600 Wachovia Tower

Birmingham, Alabama 35203-5202

(205) 328-0480

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this the 30th day of April, 2007, the foregoing has been

electronically filed with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send

notification ofsuch filing, to the following counsel ofrecord:

James H. Starnes

Attorney for Defendants

P0 Box 590003

Birmingham, AL 35259

(205) 320-0800

S. Sanford Holliday

Attorney for Defendants

P0 Box 727

Roanoke, AL 36274

(334) 863-2717

5/ David B. Hall

OF COUNSEL

2

B JAC2 745481 vi

1039265-000044 4/30/2007

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT A

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 1 of 10
I1~TEE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT

OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

VFS LEASING CO. )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO,

) 3:06ev638-SRW

)

aF. KEliX~INC. d/bIaKELLY )

TRUCKING; and GUY KFLIX, )

)

Defendants )

DECLARATION OF MIChAELCOX

My iianie is Michael Cox. The statcrnent~contained herein are based on

my persnn~lknowledge. and I am competent to testi 1~y about all matters on which I am

offering evidence herein.

LjI~1~0rlhMmfhl Reviewed ~uidQ~~lificatioiis

2, The opinioiis derived herein arc made up ol a review ofthe infomiatioti

made avaflable to me in regardsto this ease, and n~ypersonal knowledge ofthe heavy

transportation equipment industry. I have been involved with thetransportation indusliy

since 1991. specializing in mediuni/heavy trucks and trailers.

A. Imformatk~Rcvivw~d

3. The information I have rcvicw~xIto fbrrn my opinions on this matter

includes:

Affidavit ofGuy F. Kelly.

• Deposition ofKevin Miller, VFS LeasingCo.~employee And all docunienL~

contained therein

• Inspection Reports completed by Asset Appraisal Services

Atildavi I ofCharles David Lanee

Deposition oI’Guy F. Kelly

• Deposition ofCharles Davis Lance

• Asset Appraisal Services Internal database ofauction saics results

B, Expert Experience

4. Resume attached as Exhibit A

C. Puhlkhed Ww’ks

I i’~I / A’i/~ /~T~(J I

~ ( .~‘)~‘

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 2 of 10
5. 1 have had no published papers in the last I () years.

I), Con rtruom and Depus~tionTestimony

6. List attached as Exhibit LI

E. Expert Witness Charges

7. Asset Appraisal Services charges $1 00 per hour I~wtestimony plus

expenses, and $100 per hour for research and documentation fees.

II. Oninions

8, On behalfof Baker, Donaldson, l3earman caldwell & Berlcowitv, P.C. I

have been asked to provide an expert opinion for si~issues:

• Did VFS Iteasing Co. act in a commercially reasonable manner when they

liquidated units leased by the defendant; specifically units: (last three of yIN)

013, 014, 015, 016, 017. 018, 019, 020, 021, 738, 739, 763~ 764, 762, 584, 989,

95~,954, 953, 952, 959.

• Were the chai’gcs accrued to the derendant’s account ftir Reconditioning services,

specifically the detailing charged to several ofthe units reasonable for themarket?

• Were the charges accrued to the defendant’s account for Repossession expenses

reasonable for themarket?

• Were the charges accrued to the defendant’s accounts Ic,’ Inspection services

reasonable fOr the market?

Is Guy F. Kelly qualified to he an expert witness on any or all oJ’these issues?

• Is Charles Davis Lance qualified to be an expert witness on any or all ofthese

issues?

A. VI’S LiiuklatiDn

9. It is my experience, observing Y~lv~Commercial Fbiunce and VFS

Leasing Co. for over s~xyears, that its practicesin this area are commercially reasonable.

10. It is my opinion that VF’S Leasing Co. acted in a commercially reasonable

manner in the selling ofeach ofthe units atissue for the following reasons:

• VFS Leasing Co. marketed these units to the marketplace that would he

interested in purchasing this equipnienL

• VFS Leasing Co. insured redundancy in their sales process by consigning the

units iii a reserved auction at the Adessa Heavy Truck Sale in Atlanta, GA,

one ofthe largest ~xedlocation auctions in the United Stales

• The prices that VFS Leasing Co. received for the units are consistent with the

market values for similar units under the market conditions present during the

time frame: October2005 to January 2006.

~ / •‘~~‘;~ F /~~/!i~/J~ A’i~~

BJAC2 7455O4v~

~265~&1X144I27flOO~

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 3 of 10
11. VFS Leasing Co. used their standard sales precess to make these units

available forsale. This process included:

• ‘Ihe units were sent to Adessa in Atlanta, CA for storage and reconditioning.

During this time the units were consigned to a reserved puce puhli~auction.

They did not meet the reserve and did not sell,

• The units were listed on the limited access wholesale website open to

quali lied wholesale buyers who wlsh to purchase equipment from VFS

Leasing Co. During the time of listing, the national wholesale equipment

community was actively utilizing thissite.

‘The cquiplrient was listed and marketed by Vl~SLeasing Co. for sale to the

buyer who placesthe highest offer on the web site during a set period oftime,

VFS Leasing Co. received multiple bids and sold the units to the highest

bidder for lair rm~rketvalue.

12. The method that \TFS Leasing Co. utilized to sell the said equipment is

consistent with acceptable industry practices.

I3~ The p~cesVFS Leasing Cu~received For the units were at or above fluir

market value lbr similar equipment in specilication and condition.

14. The method VFS Leasing Co. used is not unique and is considered an

acceptable industry practice for disposing ofequipment. VFS Leasing (~o,would have

employed this method no matter the situation with the equipment, whether thai.

equipment was off-lease arid owned by Volvo, a repossessed unit or a lease default

similar to the Kelly units.

15. VFS Leasing Co. could have pursued other sales avenues or methods

accepted in the industry, hut doing so would have meant marketing the equipment ihi a

longer period oftime, at additional cost thus decreasing the overall value ofsale,

B. Opinion vf Rce~rnditioningFees

16. Volvo was charged $500.00 for a standard detail on select units. Based oii

my knowledge of the Used ‘Iruck marketplace and my experience in the industry;

$500.00 is a reasonable fcc to pay to detail a tractor such as those in question.

C. O~ininnci Repossession Fees

17. Volvo was charged $700~00per unit l’or each unit repossessed from G.F.

Kelly. Based on my experience in the industry and based on my experience working

directly with Banks and Finance Companies for ovei- seven years; $700,00 is not an

unreasonable fcc for this service as it was described in Mi~Miller’s deposition.

1). !peetk~mServices

I ‘~/ ~ ( ~ ~ i !/ .1 ~~ !~

F~JA(2 74,53Q~vi

1 ~39~54)~X111 ~‘tf27J2QO7

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 4 of 10
18. Asset Appraisal services has been in business since 1999. We provide

inspections arid aid in remarketing far heavy transpol’tation equipment. Since 1999 we

have inspected over 40,000 pieces of’ heavy Iron.sportaflon equipment. We provide our

services to VFS Leasing Co.

19. Our customer list includes many ot’VFS I

1

easingCo. ~speers:

DaimlcrChryslci’Truck Financial PACCAR Financial

Navislar Financial Welts Fargo Eq Finance

US Bank Eq Finance Bank of America

20. We provide services lbr these customers ranging li-om inspections to

complete liquidation solutions.

21. We charge VI~SLeasing Co. $300.00 for each inspection. ‘this cost is in

line with what we charge other customers for similar services. We charge between

$208.00 and $400.00 per similar inspection Rr all ofour customers. The price is directly

related to the amount of units we do ~ ~a~hindividual customer, Asset Appraisal does

have rnaLkct competition and their charges are competitive in the marketplace.

22, Asset Appraisal Services utilizes a standard method for completing all of

our appraisals and condition reports:

• The unit is assigned to us by the finance company or owner

* We assign one ofour inspectorsto do the inspection.

• When the inspection is complete it is sent to our Omaha fädihty where it is

inputted into one of’ caii’ proprietary sofiware systems that we us to

communicate the hi Ihi-niation to our customer,

• After the unit goes through data entry, our Quality Control Stall looks the

inspection over for errors. They price each reconditioning item using

industry standard pricing for parts and job time.

• After Quality Control has signed off nit the unit, a communication is sent

to the customer tonail ly them that the unit is ready for viewing.

23. Our quality control stall has a combined thirty years of’working on trucks

arid trailers and running shops. They are in regular contact with service cciiters around

the country and allofthe onginal equipment manufacturers.

24. ‘l’hc p1-ices that we list for reconditioning arc meant to be used as a

guideline. Each reconditioning item is normally photographed. Publishing the prices

with the photographs allows our customers to fairly represent the units to prospective

buyers.

E. ~uy F. Kelly tis an Exp~r~Witness

I) ~ / ~ r ~I f../~ / :~~1/, I I~~

HJAC2 745304 yE

U}2t5-000044 412712007

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 5 of 10
2S. Mr. Kelly is listed as an expert witness for (iF, Kelly. Mr, Kelly~s

testimony does riot in~1udeany detiniti ye knowledge ofthe Equipment Finance industry.

He demonstrates no direct knowledge of eftber the wholesale or retail equipment sales

market. lie is deficient of any knowledge of auction theory or any knowledge ofvehicle

remarketing as it pertains to finance companies. it is ray opinion that Mr. Kelly lacks

sufficient experience, knowledge or education to render an expert opinion tm the

commercially reasonableness of the sale ofthese tractors in any respect.

F. Charles Davis Lance as an Expert Witness

26. Mr. Lance is listed us an espert witness Ibr (3,F. Kelly. Mr. Lance said

several times during his deposition on 12 April 2007 that his experience was limited to

doing repairs inside a locally owned and controlled trucking company. Mr. Lance does

not have experienceworking for a finance company. He does not have experience selling

equipment in either a wholesale or a retail environment. Ho does not have experience

making repair decisions on repossessed heavy transportation equipment. It is my opinion

thut Mr. Lance lacks the education1training, knowledge and/or experience to render an

expert opinion on any aspect ofthe commercially reasonableness ofthe sale of those

tractors.

Ill. Conclusion

27. 1 was asked to rorm au expert opinion oii six issues:

Did VllS Leasing Co. act in a commercially reasonable manner when they

liquidated units leased by the del~ndant;specil~e4llyunits : (last three of

VIN) 013) 014, 015, 016, 017, 01~,019, 020, 021, 738, 739, 763, 764,

762, 584, 989, 958, 954. 953, 952, 959.

Opinion: YES Leasing Co. sold the collateral in question in a

commercially reasonable manner that is consistent with industry

standards and hest practices,

• Are the charges accrued to the defendant’s account for Reconditioning

services, specifically the detailing charged to several of the units

reasonable in the market?

Opinion~The reconditioning tees are reasonable and were coitsistent

with charges for similar actionsin the market.

• Arc the charges accrued to the defendant’s account ftw repossession

expenses reasonable in the market?

Opinion: The repossession fees are reasonable and were consiste~tt

with fees for similar actionsin the market.

~ /~/ •~:~ (. i A/~ Ii .~ ~/1

H JAC2 74S304 t’l

~0:265-~000444127/2007

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 6 of 10
• Arc the charges accrued to the defendant’s accounts for Inspection

scivices reasonable in the market?

Opinion: The feesfor ilaspeetion services wet-c reasonable for charges

for similar services in the market.

• Is Guy 1. Kelly quali lied to render an expert opinion OIi the conimercial

i’casonahkrness ~f the sale ofthese tractors?

(}piniwi: Guy F. Kelly is not qualified to render inexpert opinion oti

the commercial reasonableness ofthe sale ofthese tractors.

• Is Charles Davis Lance quali tied to render an expert opinion on the

conunereial rca~onah1enessofthe sale ofthese tractors?

Opinion: Charles Davil Lance is not qualified to render an expert

opinion on the commercial reasonableness ofthy sale ofthese tractors.

I declare under pcruahy of pe~jury that the foregoing is true

2~1A~- 2bo~

Date

I / ~ ( ~\J:r:~ ~ r ~/ ,\:/~ 1 /~~t 1 ~ I.;.

President

Asset Appraisal Services, Inc.

5710 South 771h Street

Ralston, Nebraska 68127

DJA2~4~3a4vt

~O3fl&5~0000444/27120c7

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 7 of 10
Michael J. Cox

AssetAppraisal Services

5710 South 77th St • Ralston, Nebraska 68127

Phone: 402-390-0505 • Fax: 402-390-0489

Experience

Asset Appraisal Services Inc. Omaha, Nebraska

President January 1999 to Present

Job Responsibilities

• Complete detailed appraisals and valuations of transportation and construction

equipment.

• Consultation of clients on equipment dispersal and liquidation

• Manage day to day operations of business.

Midwest Truck and Bus Sales Inc. Omaha, Nebraska

President October 1998 to December 1999

Job Responsibilities

• Manage day-to-day operation of an independent used truck dealership.

• Buying transportation equipment at wholesale prices and reselling equipment to

retail buyers.

• Responsible for all areas of dealership, including accounting, sales, marketing, and

parts and service.

CornhuskerTrux Omaha, Nebraska

Used Truck Manager July 1997 to October 1998

Job Responsibilities

• Managed used truck operations for Navistar franchised new and used truck

dealership.

• Responsible for placing valuations on stock and future trades.

• Responsible for all reconditioning on trades and used truck purchases.

Nebraska Used Truck Sales Omaha, Nebraska

UsedTruck Sales June 1995 to July 1997

Job Responsibilities

• Used truck wholesale and retail sales.

• Responsible for wholesale purchasing of used transportation equipment.

Midlands International Trucks Omaha, Nebraska

New and Used Truck Sales May 1991 to June 1995

Job Responsibilities

• Prospecting new and used truck buyers.

• Sales of new International Trucks to fleets and owner operators.

Professional Groups

Equipment Leasing Organization

Used Truck Association

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 8 of 10
Michael J. Cox

Asset Appraisal Services

5710 South 77th St. Ralston, Nebraska

68127

Phone: 402-390-0505 • Fax: 402-390-0489

Experience

Asset Appraisal Services Inc. Omaha, Nebraska

President January 1999 to Present

Job Responsibilities

• Complete detailed appraisals and valuations of transportation and construction

equipment.

• Consultation of clients on equipment dispersal and liquidation.

• Manage day to day operations of business.

Midwest Truck and Bus Sales Inc. Omaha, Nebraska

President October 1998 to December 1999

Job Responsibilities

• Manage day-to-day operation of an independent used truck dealership.

• Buying transportation equipment at wholesale prices and reselling equipment to

retail buyers.

• Responsible for all areas of dealership, including accounting, sales, marketing, and

parts and service.

CornhuskerTrux Omaha, Nebraska

Used Truck Manager July 1997 to October 1998

Job Responsibilities

• Managed used truck operations for Navistar franchised new and used truck

dealership.

• Responsible for placing valuations on stock and future trades.

• Responsible for all reconditioning on trades and used truck purchases.

Nebraska Used Truck Sales Omaha, Nebraska

Used Truck Sales June 1995 to July 1997

Job Responsibilities

• Used truck wholesale and retail sales.

• Responsible for wholesale purchasing of used transportation equipment.

Midlands International Trucks Omaha, Nebraska

New and Used Truck Sales May 1991 to June 1995

Job Responsibilities

• Prospecting new and used truck buyers.

• Sales of new International Trucks to fleets and owner operators

Professional Groups

Equipment Leasing Organization

Used Truck Association

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 9 of 10
Rule 26(a) Disclosure

This expert witness expects to be compensated as follows: $1000.00 per day, plus travel

expenses, and $100.00 per hour for documentation.

This expert has testified in the following actions:

Ronnie Dowdy Trucking (Little Rock, AR):

Case: 1:02-BK-I 4313 Date 7/31/02

Jordan Carriers (Jackson, MS):

Case: BK 01-01140 Chapter 11 Date 6/6/02

Dick Simon (Salt Lake City, UT)

Case: BK 02-22906GEC Date: 2/10/03

GregDerry (Omaha, NE) Date: 12/18/00

Case: Douglas County District Court Page 978 Page 893

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 10 of 10
EXHIBIT B

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-3 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAM4~

EASTERN DWISION

VFS LEASING CO. )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

VS. ) 3:06cv638-SRW

)

G.F. KELLY, INC. dlb/a KELLY )

TRUCKING; and GUY KELLY, )

)

Defendants )

DECLARATION OF KEITH WEACHTER

1. My name is Keith Weachter. The statements contained herein are based on my personal

knowledge, and I am competent to testify about all matters on which I am offering evidence herein.

2. I am the Repossession Coordinator for Alternative Collection Solutions, Inc. (“ACS”). I

have held this position for four (4) years. As part of my responsibilities, I am in charge of locating

equipment in need ofrepossession, hiring agents to handle the repossession and coordinating delivery of

the equipment once it has been repossessed. I am familiar with the standard rates for repossession for

ACS as well as our competitors in the same industry. The average repossession fee in the heavy trucking

equipment industry is $1200 $1500 per unit.

3. ACS charges a standard rate of $1,000/unit. This fee includes the coordinator fee, the

agent fees and the costs generated to locate the unit. This charge is a reasonable and competitive rate

within the repossession industry. Generally, when our client needs more than ten (10) units repossessed,

we offer the client a discount per unit.

3. In or about August, 2005, 1 coordinated the repossession oftwenty-one (21) tractorsfrom

G.F. Kelly, Inc. (“Kelly Trucking”) for VFS Leasing Co. (“VFS”). Because VFS needed more than ten

(10) units repossessed, we charged a discounted rate for the repossession of $700/unit.

4. Based on my knowledge of the repossession industry and of the rates of ACS’s

competitors, the $700.00 fee that VFS charged back to Kelly Trucking for repossession of each of the

twenty-one (21) tractors was a competitive and reasonable fee.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

_~o7 _____

Date Keith Weachter

Repossession Coordinator

Alternative Collection Solutions, Inc.

B JAC2 745239 vi

IO39265~OOOO444/27/2007

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-3 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT C

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-4 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 1 of 34
FREEDOM COURT REPORTING

Page 1

IN THE UNITED STATES

DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

ORIGINAL

6 CIVIL ACTION NUMBER: 3:06CV638-SRW

8 VFS LEASING CO.,

Plaintiff,

10 vs.

G.F. KELLY, INC., d/b/a KELLY TRUCKING;

12 and GUY KELLY,

Defendants.

14

15

16 DEPOSITION TESTIMONY OF

GUY F. KELLY

April 12, 2007

10:45 a.m.

COURT REPORTER:

MELANIE L. PETIX, CSR, CLR

367 VALLEY AVENUE

(205) 397-2397 BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA 1-800-373-3660

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-4 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 2 of 34
FREEDOM COURT REPORTING

Page 98

information you had access to in

2 reaching those opinions?

A. Yes.

Q. Okay. I will show you what

has been marked as Plaintiff’s Exhibit

6 10.

7 MR. STARNES: Is that this?

8 MR. HALL: Right.

Q. (BY MR. HALL:) What does the

10 OLV column mean?

11 A. Orderly liquidation value.

12 Q. Is that the price that you

13 agreed to sell the tractors to U.S.

14 Xpress for under the Asset Purchase

15 Agreement?

16 A. Yes.

17 Q Do you know what a desktop

18 evaluation is?

19 A. No.

20 Q. Do you know whether or not an

21 actual inspection of the tractors took

22 place in reaching the orderly

23 liquidation value that’s reflected on

367 VALLEY AVENUE

(205) 397-2397 BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA 1-800-373-3660

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-4 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 3 of 34
FREEDOM COURT REPORTING

Page 99

Plaintiff’s Exhibit 10?

A. U.S. Xpress sent a team to

Wadley to inspect equipment, yes.

Q. Do you know whether or not a

physical inspection of the Volvo

tractors took place that the orderly

liquidation value is based upon?

A. Ask me that again.

Q. Okay. I tell you what, it

doesn’t matter.

There’s a column that’s marked

mileage over to the left, it appears.

Do you know what date that mileage was

recorded?

367 VALLEY AVENUE

(205) 397-2397 BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA 1-800-373-3660

L

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

A. No.

Q. Do you know what date the

orderly —- the information that’s

contained on this Plaintiff’s Exhibit

10, do you know when it was obtained?

A. No. Not the exact~date, no.

Q. If you could, look on

Plaintiff’s Exhibit 10, unit number

102

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-4 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 4 of 34
FREEDOM COURT REPORTING

Page 100

A. Okay.

2 Q. What was the mileage on

what am I looking for? Here is it. Do

you have a copy of this over there?

A. No.

6 Q. I will look on that one, you

look on Exhibit 2.

8 MR. STARNES: That’s my

exhibit. That’s the original one.

10 That’s my copy. It’s the same thing.

11 MR. HALL: We don’t have the

12 unit numbers on here, do we?

13 MR. STARNES: No. See, that’s

14 your deal. Y’all didn’t put the truck

15 numbers. Now, there’s one --

16 THE WITNESS: Yeah. I got the

17 serial numbers.

18 MR. STARNES: -- that he had

19 somewhere, you know, that had the truck

20 number written with red ink on the

21 side.

22 Q (BY MR. HALL:) VIN number

23 015 —~

~ ~

367 VALLEY AVENUE

(205) 397-2397 BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA 1-800-373-3660

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-4 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 5 of 34
FREEDOM COURT REPORTING

Page 101

A. Right.

2 -— what was the mileage on it

at repossession or that’s reflected on

Plaintiff’s Exhibit 2?

A. Let’s see. 353,196, looks

6 like.

Q. 196 or 198, maybe?

8 A. Yeah.

Q. And the number reflected on

10 Plaintiff’s Exhibit 10 is 507,679?

11 A. Correct.

12 Q. So 40 some odd thousand more

13 miles at the time of repossession?

14 A. Correct.

15 Q. And what was the price that

16 you were going to sell it to U.S.

17 Xpress for?

18 A. Twenty-two five.

19 Q. What is the price that you say

20 in this case the 015, in your opinion,

21 should have been sold for?

22 A. I don’t know. You will have

23 to tell me.

367 VALLEY AVENUE

(205) 397-2397 BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA 1-800-373-3660

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-4 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 6 of 34
FREEDOM COURT REPORTING

Q. It’s on your resale summary.

A. I don’t have it. Oh, yeah, I

Page 102

1

4

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

Q.

WITNESS:

MR. HALL:)

sell for?

Thirty-two.

And what did

A. It sold for 26.

do. It’s -—

MR. STARNES: It’s in your

affidavit.

THE WITNESS: My bad. I

thought it was on the other sheet.

MR. STARNES: Next to the last

page.

THE

(BY

it actually

correct?

015, 26?

MR. STARNES: I think the

resale summary in the affidavit is

incorrect. I think it actually is 26

and not 27. So you actually owe us

another thousand bucks.

MR. HALL: Well, thank you.

Q. (BY MR. HALL:) All right. Is

there a reason why your opinion of the

Q.

Is that

367 VALLEY AVENUE

(205) 397-2397 BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA 1-800-373-3660

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-4 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 7 of 34
FREEDOM COURT REPORTING

1 CERTIFICATE

2

3 STATE OF ALABAMA:

4 JEFFERSON COUNTY:

5

6 I hereby certify that the above and

7 foregoing deposition was taken down by me

8 in stenotype, and the questions and answers

9 thereto were reduced to typewriting under

10 my supervision, and that the foregoing

11 represents a true and correct transcript of

12 the deposition given by said witness upon

13 said hearing.

14 I further certify that I am neither of

15 counsel nor kin to the parties to the

16 action, nor am I in any way interested in

17 the result of said cause.

18

19

20

21

23

367 VALLEY AVENUE

(877) 373-3660 BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA (205) 397-2397

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-4 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 8 of 34
Case 3:06-cv-006~SRW Document 20 Filed 02/1 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

VFS LEASING CO.,

PLAINTIFF,

) CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:06CV638-SRW

VS.

G. F. KELLY, INC d/b/a KELLY

TRUCKING; and GUY KELLY, )

)

DEFENDANTS. )

AFFIDAVIT OF GUY KELLY

STATE OF ALABAMA

COIJNTY OF RANDOLPH

Before me, the undersigned authority in and forsaid state and countypersonally appeared

Guy Kelly who, after being duly sworn, deposes and says as follows:

1. My name is Guy Kelly and I ampresident of GF Kelly, Inc. (“Kelly Trucking”). I

have been in the trucking business since 1985 and started Kelly Trucking in 1990.

2. I am familiarwith over-the-road trucks and the buying, repairing and selling of

same. I am very familiarwith the 21 trucks at issue in this case as I was the person who bought

the trucks and was responsible for overseeing them during the time theywere owned by Kelly

Trucking. I am also very familiar with the condition ofthe trucks at the time theywere

repossessedby Volvo.

3. I have reviewed the deposition of Kevin Miller, exhibits to that deposition, and

the affidavit of Charles Lance. Ihave also reviewed the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by

Volvo.

4. Based on my knowledge of and experience in the trucking industry, it is my

opinion that Volvo is attempting to charge Kelly Trucking excessive amounts for repossession

expense, inspection fees, and detailing fees. The fees which Volvo requests the court to award

are excessive and unreasonable. These fees are not in keeping with the standard in the industry

in 2005.

5. Additionally, based on my knowledge and experience in the industry, it is my

opinion that Volvo did not resell the trucks following repossession in a commercially reasonable

manner and in keepingwith the standard in the industry.

6. Volvo is requesting that it be awarded $700.00 in repossession expense for each

ofthe 21 trucks. This amount is ridiculously excessive and unreasonable. When it became

apparent that Kelly Trucking could not make the required lease payments on the trucks due to

unforeseen circumstances, I worked with Volvo to make the repossession simple and efficient.

All 21 trucks were brought to the Kelly Trucking yard in Wadley, Alabama and Volvo was

S

I

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-4 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 9 of 34
I

Case 3:06-cv-O063~~RW Document 20 Filed 02/1 3/2~.~7 Page 2 of 6

notified as the trucks arrived in the yard. Volvo then sent drivers to Wadley who drove the

trucks 75 miles to the Adesa yard in Fairburn, Georgia. The distance between the Kelly Trucking

yard and the Adesa yard is less than 75 miles. At the time of this repossession, the standard

mileage rate to pay drivers would be 35 cents per mile round-trip. For a 150-mile round-trip, the

total cost for each truck would be $51.50. The total mileage charge for all trucks would be

$1,081.50. To cover additional costs, the maximum reasonable amount ofrepossession expenses

under these circumstances would be $200.00 per truck. If a commercially reasonable charge of

$200.00 had been claimedby Volvo, Kelly would be charged $4,200.00 rather than $14,700.00.

This is a difference of $10,500.00. This is the amount that Kelly should not be charged by

Volvo.

7, Volvo claims it is due to be reimbursed an inspection fee of $300.00 on each

truck. The total amount Volvo is claiming for these inspections is $6,300.00. I have reviewed

the inspection reports and have determined the type and amount of work that went into to

performing these inspections. I have also reviewed the deposition of Miller where he describes

these inspections. The charge of $300.00 is unreasonable and excessive based on my experience

and the standard in the industry. The maximum amount that would be reasonable for an

inspection under these circumstances is $125.00 per truck, which wouldresult in a total charge of

$1,675.00. This results in a difference of $4,625.00. Kelly Trucking should not be charged with

this amount that Volvo is claiming.

8. Volvo is claiming that it is entitled to $500.00 each for detailing 8 ofthe

21 trucks. The total detailing expense being claimed is $4,000.00. This amount is clearly

excessive. It is the standard in the industry for a used truck to be cleaned and detailed prior to

putting it on the market for sale. However, $500.00 is a greatly excessive price forthis.

Detailing oftrucks is done in my shop every day. In 2005 the reasonable charge for detailing a

truck ofthistype was $125.00. Thus, Volvo should only be entitled to a total of $1,000.00 for

detailing 8 trucks, not $4,000.00. Kelly Trucking does not owe Volvo the difference of

$3,000.00.

9. Each inspection report contains an estimate of expenses associated with bringing

the truck up to a wholesale condition. It is the standard in the industry to sell trucks in a

wholesale condition. As stated in the affidavit ofCharles Lance, the reconditioning expenses

shown in the 21 appraisal reports are greatly excessive. As an employee of KellyTrucking for

many years, Mr. Lance is very familiarwith the reasonable cost associated with repairssuch as

those shown in these appraisal reports. The reasonable amounts ofthese repairs are shown in the

chart whichis a part of his affidavit that I have reviewed. By including greatly excessive

reconditioning expenses in the information available to prospective bidders, Volvo drew avery

unrepresentative picture ofthe value ofthe truck. Obviously a truck that needs $8,000.00 in

reconditioning is less valuable than a truck that needs $3,000.00 in reconditioning. However,

Volvo consistently with all 21 trucks showed an amount ofreconditioning expenses that was

excessive. Had the actual real-world cost ofthe reconditioning been shown in the appraisal

reports, prospective buyers would have had a much more representative picture ofthe true value

of the trucks. This would have resulted in higher bids and greater sale prices. Posting excessive

reconditioning expenses was not commercially reasonable and in keeping with industry

standards.

10. The testimony of Kevin Miller, remarketing manager for Volvo, clearly shows

that Volvo either has no policy relating to getting maximum sale prices on repossessed trucks or

has a policy that can be violated when convenient. For instance, Miller testified that a highmileage truck in poor condition would be put through the auction rather than put out for bids on

the Volvo web site. However, the records on the 21 trucks reflected on two occasions that trucks

were put in the auction that were low-mileage and good-condition trucks. When asked to explain

this discrepancy, Miller simply said that Volvo did not always want to put junk at the auctions so

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-4 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 10 of 34
Case 3:06-cv-0O6~~SRW Document 20 Filed 02/1 3LJ7 Page 3 of 6

sometimes they put better-condition trucks in the auction. Another example of Volvo’s

inconsistency is that Miller testified that Volvo sells repossessed trucks “is-as, where-is.”

However, there were three occasions in this case where Volvo paid substantial amounts of money

to purchasers after the deal was closed and the purchase made. This is a clear violation of “as-is,

where-is” policy and is not commercially reasonable

11. Kevin Miller testified that Volvo puts a sale price on the web page for each truck

it put on the market. He testified that the sale price posted on the Internet would be $3,000.00-

$5,000.00 more than maximum wholesale value. However, on at least 18 ofthe 21 trucks, the

posted sale price was greatly less than that amount. This again clearly shows that Volvo has no

policy regarding disposal ofrepossessed trucks or does not consistently apply apolicy.

12. I have knowledge that it is the standard on web sites of other manufacturers and

auction companies to allow prospective bidders to see bids previously placed. Additionally, once

bids on a particular truck are opened, the web site specifically states the time and date on when

the auction closes. That is the standard and is what is commerciallyreasonable in my opinion.

However, on Volvo’s web site, bidders do not have access to the amount of previous bids. This

is not commercially reasonable. A bidder is much more likely to lowball. Also, someone who is

outbid is not aware ofthat fact and thus does not know he needs to redid. That is my opinion

which is based on my experience. Additionally, an auction on the Volvo web site can last from

1 hour to 30 days. The date and time an auction on a particular truck is closed is solely up to

Volvo. The auction on 16 ofthe 21 trucks lasted 4 or fewer days. The maximum time for any

auction was 14 days and only one other lasted 7 days. Twelve auctions remained open for

48 hours or less. In my opinion this is commercially unreasonable.

13. Three trucks were sold to Volvo & GMC ofCharlotte. According to Mr. Miller,

this dealer is one of Volvo’s top ten customers for used trucks. In all three auctions where this

dealer was the high bidder, the auction was closed immediately after receipt ofthis dealer’s bid.

Even though the auction on all three trucks had been active, Volvo chose to close the auction as

soon as thistop dealer gave a higher bid. This is extremely suspicious and in my opinion is not

commercially reasonable. As will be stated below, the sales priceon all three ofthese trucks was

more than $30,000.00 lower than the true valueofthe trucks.. Five trucks were sold to Ed

Schmidt Trucks, another top 10 customer according to Mr. Miller. Four ofthe auctions were

open for less than 48 hours and were closed as soon as Schmidtwas the low bidder. Closing

auctions so quickly for the benefit of one dealer is not commerciallyreasonable. The trucks were

sold to Schmidt for more than $30,000.00 less than their value.

PURCHASES BY TOP 10 CUSTOMERS

Customer GFK Truck No. Serial No. (Last 3) Days Bids Open Bids

Ed Schmidt Trucks 103 015 1 2

108 019 2 2

190 763 4 3

249 952 2 3

244 959 1 2

Volvo ofCharlotte 243 958 4 3

242 954 4 4

241 953 4 4

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-4 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 11 of 34
Case 3:06-cv-006C-SRW Document 20 Filed 02/1 3C~7 Page 4 of 6

14. The standard in the industry is that a truck sold at auction, whether it be a live auction or

an internet auction, is sold “as-is, where-is.” According to Miller, this is also Volvo’s policy. A

bidder has the opportunity to determine the condition ofthe truck based on what is posted on the

web site and also has the opportunity to visually inspect the truck at wherever it is located. Once

the sales price is paid by the low bidder and the title is passed, the truck is owned by the low

bidder and he takes the truck in an “as-is” condition. However, Volvo is attempting to charge

Kelly Trucking $12,369.10 it had paid to three purchasers after the sale was closed. Volvo paid

$4,000.00 on KellyTruck No. 110; $5,489.00 on KellyTruck No. 192; and $2,880.10 on Kelly

Truck No. 243. According to Mr. Miller, the problems with these trucks were easily discoverable

by both the bidder and the inspection company hired by Volvo. These payouts are not in keeping

with industry standards andare commercially unreasonable. Kelly Trucking should not be

charged for the amount ofthese payments. Documents produced by Volvo showing that these

payments were made long after the trucks were sold “as is” are attached (“Volvo Repair Docs).

15. Attached to this affidavit is a Resale Summarychart which has been prepared

utilizing Volvo documents. The first colunm shows the Kelly truck number; the second column

shows the last digits ofthe truck serial number; the third column shows the number of days bids

were open on the web site; the fourth column shows the number ofbids received on the truck;

column five shows the commerciallyreasonable value of the truck after all deducts for necessary

repairs and other expenses andthat value is further discounted; column six shows the price

Volvo sold the truck for; and colunm seven shows the difference between what the reasonable

amount Volvo should have received for the truck and the amount Volvo actually received. The

total difference for the 12 trucks included in the chart is $101,810.00. It is my opinion that this is

the additional amount Volvo would have received had it conducted the reselling ofthese trucks

in a commercially reasonable manner. The 8 truckssold to the two top dealers described above

are included in this chart and the loss on those trucks alone amounts to more than $60,000.00.

16. The values shown in the fifth column are my opinion of whatthe trucks would

have sold for had they been sold in a commerciallyreasonable manner. These values take into

consideration the legitimate reconditioning expenses, the mileage, and make and model. These

values were further discounted at least 10 percent, even though, as MrMiller stated, it was a

seller’s market at the time these trucks were sold.

17. There are many other costs and charges which Volvo is attempting to place on me

and my company which are not legitimate and are excessive and unreasonable. The defendants

are entitled to present evidence of all the unreasonable charges to the Court so that the Court can

determine the amount that is due Volvo in this case. Volvo is not entitled to an amount close to

what it is claiming in its motion for summaryjudgment.

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-4 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 12 of 34
Case 3:06-cv-006cSRW Document 20 Filed 02/13L~J7 Page 5 of 6

RESALE SUMMARY

GFK

Truck No.

Serial No.

(Last 3)

Days Bids

Open

Bids Value Sale Price Difference

103 015 1 2 $32,000 $27,000 $5,000

107 018 7 2 $32,000 $21000 $11,000

108 019 2 2 $32,000 $24,000 $8,000

109 020 6 3 $36,000 $26,670 $9,330

110 021 2 3 $38,000 $28,000 $10,000

169 739 Not

Available

Not

Available

$27,000 $22,000 $5,000

192 764 14 5 $34,000 $25,520 $8,480

243 958 4 3 $51,000 $38,000 $13,000

242 954 4 4 $52,000 $40,300 $11,700

241 953 4 4 $51,000 $42,300 $8,700

240 952 2 3 $49,000 $39,300 $9,700

244 959 1 2 $49,000 $37,000 $12,000

TOTAL $101,810

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-4 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 13 of 34
Case 3

:

06-cv-006L ~SRW Document 20 Filed 02/1 ~7 Page 6 of 6

Is! Guy Kelly

Guy Kelly

SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME thisthe 12th day of February, 2007

Is! Kathleen W. Newman

Notary Public

My Commission Expires: 2/19/2007

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-4 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 14 of 34
C C

Case 3:06-cv-00638- RW .Document 0 Filed 02/13/2007 Page 1 of 5

Central aroJina I’ruc s, Inc 1nVO~CGN0~ 384243106

306 Pinr~iitwOriv~K~rnergvi11e,NC27284 .. ~.. ~

\Vatts. 800-672-4201 Lo&.al ~338993 2106 1 if ¶ 4

Fax: 336-.993-8466

u~edtruuk~)catca.u1inafrucke.com 3/31/2008

-. iNVOICE

~-. Customer

Name Volvo Commerdal Finance LLC The Americas

l<e~i~lar____Debra Nelson_____ ____

Address 7823 National Service Road ______ _____

City Greensboro State NC ZIP 27409

Phone 336-931-4148 Fax~.336-931-4148 _____

bodywork around cab of truck thathad bean done

incorrectly thatwas not noted on condition report

You Danny

(O~te

I Used Truck4

I Description

~Ref

______ U~jtPIIc*

i~âEi~

SubTotal

$hippin9 & Handling

Taxes State

Payment Details

o Cash

@ Check

O Credit Card

Name _______

CC# _____

Expires __________

3/a1t2008

3842

325021

02810

VOLVO

TOTAL

$0.00

$4,000.00 — -

$0.00

S $0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

___ $0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00

______ - 50,00

TUTAL. $4,000.00

Internal Office Use Only

Credit Account 23021..

CredIt Account 81021

Credit UnIt 3842 $4,000.00

Credit Account 90522

Thank You Fbr YourfIusiness III VFS Leasing v. G.F. Kelly

Plaintiffs P 000567

Dcc. Prod.

Visit Us On The Web at: www.ceplrakarolinatrucks.com

OK ~L~)~1c

r

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-4 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 15 of 34
( (

CI1ARLOT1~

3700 JEFI ADAMS OR,

CHARLOTTE, NC 28203.

(704)5987890

VOLVO & QMQ TRK8 CAROLIMA

P.O. BOX 560007

CI4ARLOTrE, NO 26250-

AUW~VOlCE6DL~AND PAYA~TO: P.O. R~6~171$~Ctta~tt0, NC 2828011Th

ThRMS: NET ILTT1I PROX ~utIsm& ciJwv.~.speclltet A $uM~aobsias o~1 iax p.r month

(~f7ectJvsrats ci 10% pw annum) w4$ b~ahav~.dan 0dM due wasmt.. Any claims ffl shorta~ni

ci dedU~lo~ft~renw$Qia ctlaIao. muat ~ mad. withIn thirty ~ altar mtim~tof000dL

WARRAKIY: The Isbfttty at Cts1u~dn.sAUantk fr~~sQ~iJtodto 8~cbIi~adonsp~v~to th.

w~n-untyprovisions which am sat torth on ha isimr.. Ida hsmci.

02/20/2008 13

r~~ô6~iO~40 ri~a’i:ditixwsrni~i~rc

Cummins

____ Atlantic

___ Inc

D~tM’iE~it~ëTR~~TJ~,132gg7Page 2 of 5~001/0)3

7?4597~ø4~

uT~Rlft.LRET1JRNRP FOR c~~~rr on ~XCIWLGEMUST

SHOWTHIS INVOICE NUMBER AU. MAThRIAL RETI.IRI’IED

FOR CREDIT SUBJECT TO 1 ~%HANPLIN3 C14’J~OE.OLD

UNIIS ~UOIBLEFOREXCHANGE MUST BE RECEIVED

WtTHN 30 DA’~3.F~uERAL101 s&4294~1a2

—

flfl3...57475 I

VOLVO & GMC IRKS CAROLINA

S P.O. ØOX 680007

CHARLOTr~.NC23266-

RBM~1~TDIP.O.&~&G177$ I

CiwdaSa. P#~2~O..177i

PAGE 10F3

S C)’~AR13B~

~‘‘ dU~taM~~AAg~ sa. — - UT! j~ Male j65$~ — - ?ugp so ~aKr

18-FEB~2008 . 02-OCT.2002 ISX 500

ca_yoga. Wa, - 5*0~ r*a_Mi*~ ...~..~ ~ ~__~

fl-IS 14042137 CPL2~~ VNM BERIE8

!*~. sa.~ — ,gays siap.. p~iapson - igay s*. —

S0331 ¶102 Us$1. P6261

.4411i .

WUI~UIUUUUViT~

osNlM$Nivu4 4V4NOeTJ33N341gO6

COMPLAINT

LEAKS

OIL IN 000I.AWT & COOLANT IN CII.

11M NOV15

704-867-0551 .

CAUGS .OWN HSAG QASlçE~

CORECTION ADMINI~m~1N~ TlP~- OPEN ANDCt.O$E I~EPA$ORDER (SHOP REPAIRS)

TECUw.EBHOOT-WRIICM1PII3 OR i~woRAthJColi. IN coo$.Awr

TfiOURI,ERHOOT 000tANT IN LUURICA11NO 0*.

I.uaslcATn’4Q OIL PAN - REMOVO N40 *4STAU. H000, TILT - REIZ)VEANDINSTALL

- RflAOV~AND INSTALL.

AIR OONOITIOP*R 8’VSTEM- EVACI~TEAND RECHARDE

AIR CONDITIONER CONDaNEOR REMOVE AMO INSTALl.

CPIAMI AIR COOLER- REMOVE AND INSTALl. (PART OF ANOThER n~p,&j~

RADIATOR REMOVE ANDINSTALl. (PART OP ANOTHER REPAIR)

REMOVE AND INSTAU. INNER FENDER ~AUTOManvEAPPUCATIONS)

AIR CLEANER AS5EMBL,Y, ~‘1GINe,41QLJNTED - REMOVE ANDINSTALL. ~Cii

RADIATOR ERACES. REMOVE AND INSTALL

AIR CONDITIONER COMRESSO* AND BRACKET - REMOVE AND INSTALL

POWER STEERINO RESERVOIR. ftEMOVE ANDINSTALL

COOLANT OVgruq.oWTApnc -REMOVE AND I4ETAL.L

GYLWER HEAD - REMOVE ANDINtrAU~.

PI*E58~JR5TESTED CYLINDER HEAD

INJECTOR - CLEAN ~rr~M1ORFOR MUSE, EACH T~O. RADIATOR - F%.VSH

E.NOINE • RUN-iN AND‘~ES1’(~-IMSI8SYNAMOMETER)

ifIEAM CLEAN - COMPLETE ENGINE

COVERAGO WA

REMARK REPAiR ALfl1IORIZED BY BENNY 4/10106, 27g4.9$ ES11M&Th

S —

VP5Lea’

~Iaintj~. Q V. ~p Kelly

~ PfQ~j ‘~°°0564

AUThORIZED BY DATE:

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-4 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 16 of 34
( (

~

54O,~ctO6 lCa 0630 €~8~-SRWDo~1~r1~CT~i~d~13/2OO7Page 3of5 ~OO2/oo3

- F- 17-~ØGt~4E FP~1iCLPPW~*~TL~4YIC~ - 7045 - TO~7043575543

Cummins

Atlantic

Inc

CHARLOTtE

3700 J~F~ADAMS DR.

CHARLOTTE~NC 25206.

(704)5967590

VOLVO & GMC TRKS CAROLINA

P.O. BOX 560007

CUARLOTTE, NC 28263

P. 0~/~3S --

MATERIAL RETURNEDFOR CREDi~OR XCI’W413E ~AiS7

SHOWThiS f~1’ICICENI3~EftMi. MATERIAL RETL~Ø

FOR CflEPff SUBJECT 1016% NAP4DUNC~CHARc3E, 01.0

UNITS ELIGIBLE FOR E~3W’~IEMUST bE RECEIVE!)

WITHIN 30DAYS FEDERAL 10100.0648192

‘Says- -

16-SEB-2008

- C 1k s*oui MG.. -

.

MI’S IS utaleds -

02~OcT-.2ao2

Esda$!hula. -

ISX 802

-- ruWN~. iuujputa’r~A~5~ vOLvO

-CustOMl Ms. — ileP~VIA~ - MWSISTI - *Nga~*I1DJ. NU. SPC*u. *AI*PCIKT~*aaL

7810 ~-FU-59Q$ 14042737 CPI.2629 VNM SERIES

5Ep,S* PAM.P!$J5$ PMT$ Olaf MlLlAIgaux• - — ~ilJ1f *0*1 usr~ga.

59331 1102 3~78 - P6261

1 ‘1 4025306 SET,UPPER ENGINE GASKET CECO 172.87 172.81

1 1 3824510 CLEANER. 00 CONTAcT CECO 7.18 7.02

4* 45 1377361 PS0*. *JC’aL*aRT VALVOIJNE 1.53 73.44

4 4 *3461-08 ROLOC 80150 2.06 *24

4 4 $341s-o~ RO4.OC r Disc om~ .~a sss

I I 02017 SANDPAPER OThER 1,69 1.~9

18 16 3183942 NIJT,REGULAR HEXAOON JAM CECO 1.32 21.12

I I 27217 ERASE P OThER .66 0.5*

I I 4026684 GA$FzT,oS.. PAN CEGO 98.6$ 9i.O5

I I LF9000 I.LJ$E FILlER PLO ~.10 38.10

3 3 70609 VALNEPRØ.4flJMBUIE-GL VALVOLSE *47 25541

24 24 0373 Th’RAP OIlER .33 7J~

1 1 FCAUOI AN EEZIJ’v~MI50.1 01. OThER L02 $02

2 2 05113101 ELLE NON$TOCK 2.21 4.42 *

2 2 8075020

Outside Puidgae~Prnts

GROMNEIT I4ONETOCK 4.48 8.02

1 1 20610045

OutsIde Pun~a.adT’ucIs

FILlER CA~’ NOETOCIC ILlS 16.58

1 1 $140034

C~4sI4ePUJU’aSSd PIth

SENSORLEVEL 4Smc~c

Outside Pv,~aaodParts

?MT9~

PARTS covERAeEcREorn

TOTAL PART$~

SURCHARGE TOTAU

2715

506.80

37.19

635.82

2.02~

0.00

ALL INVOICES DUEAMP PAYABLE TO: P.O. Box 80177*, C1UEa, MC 28200.17Th

TERM& NET 10Th PROX UrIa* othioMee 6pecm.d~A sorvk. dlsv5.a~1112% petmon6i

isffe~h~8rats 0115% per ennln) ~MUbe 5h1r~edon paM dUO Rmouits.Ai~.yclabr* fo~shu1u~ee

dedu~M~iaS~erroneous chIrps muM be muds wI**ithirty days after louMIt ofgoode.

WARRANTY: The hobatty st Cummins AIWIUO Inc. ~ Enladto Sle obuoaoons provided In tile

*arTsnty provIaIon$ whkh ~s Sal feSM on the n,vgaa ek$e flerluL

VFS Leasing v. G.F. Kelly

Plaintiffs’

Doc. Prod.

Nvoel: :~()

OWNE1~

VOLVO &(~MOIRKS CAROLINA

P.O. 0O~680007

CHARLOT1E~NC 25258-

TIM HOVIS -104 597-0681

PAGE 20F3

AUTHORIZED BY:

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-4 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 17 of 34
I

- ‘‘~°°~ ~

FEE- 17-2006 10 41 FEW CLFTIIHS RTLF~4TIC

l~I4~rJt(J~/13/2OO7 Page4of5 4JQOJ/uu~i

74l~~4~ - - P.

!l~1AtRE11JRN~)FOR CREDiT OR EXCI-IANGE MUST

SHOW T~ii8DIVOICE N’Jr~BER.AU. MATERIAL. REflJRNED

FOR CRED~TSUSJECT TO 15% I-IAN~UNOCMAR~.Oin

UNFTS EUGI6LE FOR EXCHANGE MUST BE RECEIVED

WIThIN ~ DAVE FEDERAL I~4~.0946192

VOLVO & (3MC IRKS CAJWLINA

P.O. 80X560007

CHARLOTTE. MC 28256-

TIM HOVIS-7Q45~7-O561

RTTO P,O.8~lO177$ I

CMdats H

0

2*265.IlTtJ

P4145 80P3

‘0114R08 —

- UjTól~àORbE*$u ‘‘- DAP - - *usp ~ib~ EOU,PEIVaT *a*L

15-FEB.2006

~ua~oussIso, asco v~a

o2..OC’T..~002

7~anail

-15*800 -

ast~eiaaata.i. se on ire,

VOLVO

tUuipiri~iNOnI~

7010 03.FLB.21300 1404a1*7 CPL2629 VNUEERIEB

- II?. NO, onLs~as pAayS cmi’. sI~a*.asisaarae 00*5 - UMYa..

68331 1102 368678 P6301

140011 Z37L36

l.A0011 coVS1W~ECREPIT~ 0.OOcJI

- TOTAL L40011

MISC.:

MISC. COVERAGE CREDrT~

TOTAl. MiEAt

Z373.20

0.08

008

0~00CR

WAR~AP4’Tie$APPLIED PARTS NOT COVERED S

TAX EXEMPT NUMBERS: NC 201 -1.080.00181 TAXES:

STATS LOS

VFS Leasing v. G.F. Kelly

Doc. Prod. P 000566

AU. INVOICES OUR ANt) PAYABLE ‘IIl P.O. b~601778, CilsIlotte,NC 28280.1775

TERMS t~Tian’s PV4QX u~rInusothatwtle *pect1~d.A seM~tharO. MI 1~4%per month -

(4ff.dlve rate at 18% ~ ursnsn) w*I be chirpS e~p** due amount,. Mj Mekns fer stwrtO9es

or dodu08ons for erroneous charges 11)1*1 be msde s4th~ithirty days olaf receIpt ofgoode.

WAR~4NTY~TIre flaNity of Cumrnlna AtW*i~Inc. I Ikt*od to the otigadoce provided Ip the

warranty pWabc~awt~Ichturn sat ?otth on thm re~ernaside hereof.

AUR TOTAL:

TOTALTM:

TOTAL AMOUNT’ US I

2,800.10

0.00

2,890.10

Do~&~&~t ~

704S%Z!0~39

Cummtn*

_____ Atlantic

Inc~

CHARLOTTE

3700 JEFF ADAMS DR.

CHARLOTTE, NC 28206-

(704)~59676E0

~LI~

VOLVO & GMC IRKS CAROLINA

p.o. aoxsaoooi

CHARLOTTE, NC 28256-

— tN’~’O!t~LNO

003-67475

AUThORIZED BY: flAT~

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-4 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 18 of 34
Case 3:06-cv-O( 8-SRW Document 20 FUed 0~

De~ 16 05 09:SSa Ron Th i~ 58S—751-8

M-4--: (2~Lr~5-‘

~Z IIIlno~sInc~ . SaIS, Service& Leasing

945. sp~ TRAIL - SQ. CHICAGOHEl 1-fl9

1

IL. E041 1.~47 • (708)isa-asoo - - FAX (708) ma-a486

,9~7.V~ :7—,*~,,?

?~C~ i. ~~T! 12/15/05 8RANCH f’2 E~TtM~’P~o.?~1c~o~-4

-1P~~5~Li14/05

TI?~EPROMI~E~ .~z~t~f~’ICI DATE 12.~15!~

- ~~j~-_ ,. -

F ~-;2~~~7’ TAX.~LE ,~~,

0 . - ~ ~ ~-‘.,;,J. ... .-~. -.

R

~S.~S.--

.55—. — .. .-—_,.:~: — --.‘

~ d~ ~ “~,“

~USTOMER bITJNSER

;KRVIcE WP.jT~R KEyIN ROSENTHAL

EQUIPMENT

:~1~O~4ATION

2000 OTME~.. M0D~VOLVO

IN-SERVICE 0/00/00 - 411es

s~RLA~.*

UNIT* .

ODOMETER

LZCE2~E

1N.3147e~4fr-.J

1’)

425.422

E0

)1

r’E5C1UPTION

ESTIMJ~TETO REPLAC2

S

~RAN3.

~

E~’I~s~14MAaY

~

~ ~ç’~ LABOR ?~T~MISC

~ ~O0 4,57~.4~

—

•.::..:..::~ --———- 91000 4,~7~I.45

~

- ~ ~

‘2 ~TDIATE TOTM1

- ~

S5~. - :-:~...,

.

~CTAL

5,5J3~.),45

._

S.---— 5j~kO.45

5, 4~945

—

L~-N1’ ~. *-N

2tTST~ ~IN1U ThrrEF~NALtTSED ~ -~---. ~.

-~ ~4AT~IAL TO 3E ~ET1.~RNi~OWIThOUT OUR P2*MJSS10N. ~s..aia~oa I~ETURN$I’41.$ST ~ ~ ~ ‘a

~&YS, ~CZ~o~aPDNtED OV Y~3S NVOICZ. RETUEH$ ARE SU*iECT TO PtA~4DL.NQCIOA*G8S.

(~~4AP..~CEC~4*~GEAT A PERIODiC I~ATE0$ 1 ~‘2~~R MONTH, WHICH IS AN ANNUAL P€RC~TAGE~iATECE~-45%

.vu. ~c~ n~rnc~rjxj A C)UNI~~A:~1DUCJQ ~~AVS. I A$OP~A8LE~rTDcNj~V~E5ANOCOSTS,~O0L-.- ~ ~

-~‘4CS~.LLC

~cGQUNTSOVZ~4~Dl~.’(SPAST~)*~ tVIU. 35 PUT 3N t~O~DW~TNOUTP1011CC UNTIl. ‘AfM~~~A~E ~Hh8JLL.

~

14 Wd~:90;S30~St ‘~Q I399~SSL EOL Th ~‘O~4d

too I~j ~taLi~r33E3iT1~flO2ZOd

>55

= Q

~ (0

(10SQ

SQ

> a_c.

c~aat~EV.i gS:co ~oo~/gT.’~j

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-4 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 19 of 34
. .

NADA Wholesale Recon 5sf. Target $ SalePrice % of Target Sale Type Sale Date Purchaser Info.

S 29,640.00 S 4,035.00 $25,605.00 $ 27000.00 105.45% Internet 11/4/2005 TEC of CA, CA

S 29,075.00 5 7,930.00 $21,145.00 $ 31,000.00 146.61% Internet 11/2/2005 Central Carolina Trucks, NC

5 31,596.05 5 6,950.00 $24,645.05 $ 26,000.00 105.50% Internet 10131/2005 TheEd Schmidt TruckStore, OH

S 32,932.00 5 11,296.00 $ 21,637.00 $ 23,000.00 106.30% Internet 10f13/2005 Central Carolina Trucks, NC

5 29,975.00 5 6,550.00 $23,425.00 $ 25,000.00 106.72% Internet 10/13/2005 Central Carolina Trucks, NC

S 32,234.10 $ 8,340.00 $23,894.10 $ 21,000.00 87.89% Auction 11/1012005 Adesa Atlanta. GA

5 33,424.50 5 6,200.00 $ 27,224.50 $ 24,000.00 88.16% Internet 10/31/2005 The Ed Schmidt Truck Store, OH

5 36,825.00 $ 8,730.00 $28,095.00 $ 26,760.00 95.25% Internet 11/1012005 M&K Volvo, Mt

5 40,574.56 5 8,055.00 $32,519.56 $ 28,000.00 86.10% Internet 10/1412005 Central Carolina Trucks, NC

5 27,250.00 S 4,140.00 $23,110.00 $ 22,000.00 95.20% Internet 10114/2005 TEC of CA. CA

S 21,896.80 5 5,935.00 $15,961.80 $ 22,500.00 140.96% Auction 11/1012005 Adesa Atlanta, GA

5 36,350.98 S 6,300.00 $30,050.98 $ 31,100.00 103.49% Internet 10/31/2005 The Ed Schmidt Truck Store. OH

5 34,808.88 5 4,855.00 $29,953.88 $ 25,250.00 84.30% Internet 11/3012005 R&J Truck Sales, Mt

$ 36,701.15 $ 4,970.00 $31,731.15 $ 31,000.00 97.70% Internet 10114/2005 Central Carolina Trucks, NC

5 23,146.80 S 4,640.00 $18,506.80 $ 24,000.00 129.68% Internet 11/4/2006 TEC of CA, CA

5 27,250.00 5 9,485.00 $17,765.00 $ 23,000.00 129.47% Internet 11/412005 TEC of CA, CA

5 45,700.00 S 4,960.00 $40,740.00 $ 39,300.00 96.47% Internet 10131/2005 Volvo&GMCof Charlotte, NC

$ 46,361.96 5 2,235.00 $44,126.96 $ 42,300.00 95.86% Internet 10131/2005 Volvo & GMCof Charlotte, NC

S 45,700.00 5 4,700.00 $41,000.00 $ 40,300.00 98.29% Internet 10131/2005 Volvo& GMC of Charlotte, NC

5 45,700.00 5 7,265.00 $38,435.00 $ 38,000.00 98.87% Internet 10/31/2005 The Ed Schmidt TruckStore, OH

5 45,769.88 5 8,200.00 $37,569.88 $ 37,000.00 98.48% Internet

104.61%

10/31/2005 The Ed Schmidt TruckStore, OH

2d \tM

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-4 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 20 of 34
V~ ~ /

Contract Number VIN# Year Make Model MiLeage NADAWholesale Recon Est. Target $ Sale Price %of Target Sale I

flT~ ~230&414 4V4NC9RH6f$328O~ 2001 Volvo VNI64T-810 ~7738?$ 29,840~0O $ 4~038.00 $25,805.00 $ 27,000.00 105.45% Internet

5OO~2OOl3U&4W ~4V4NCaRH&iN8~6el*~ ~VOI~ ~4T~64~ 5O~72~$’ ~4W5~OO~~ 7~930~OO~ ~$~2 146.61% Internet

~ 500-2001308~411 4V4NC9RHX1N325015 2001 Volvo VNL64T-610 353198 $ 31,595.05 $ 6,950.00 $24,645.05 $ 26,000.00 105.50% Internet

~ç 8~OY~4~2~4V4NC9RH11N325018 2001 Volvo VN184-T410 481707 $ 32,932~.00$ Th996~$0S21,637~00 $ 23,0~0O 106.30% Internet

(~, ~2O0$3O$412~ ~4$~4$CøRt434N8280fl~ 2001 Vo~ VP&64T410 819.~$ 29,978.00 $ 6~880~00$23,428.00 $ 2$~000~00 106.72% Internet

500-2001308-41$ 4V4NC9Th41N325018 2001 Volvo VNLS4T-610 527836 $ 32,234.10 S. 8,340.00 $23,894.10 $ 21,000.00 87.89% Auction

D 500-200130&4~3~4V4NC9TH61N325019 2001 Volvo VNL64T-610 516020 $ 33,424.50 $ 6,200.00 $27,224.50 $ 24,000.00 88.16% Internet

/ ~ 500-2001308-414 4V4NC9TH02N325020 2002 Volvo VNL64T-610 490370 $ 36,825.00 $ 8,730,00 $28,095.00 $ 26,760.00 95.25% Internet

j~0 500-2001308-41S 4V4NC9TH22N325021 2002 Volvo VNL64T-610 418136 $ 40,574.56 $ 8,055.00 $32,519.58 $ 28,000.00 88.10% Internet ~c)J500~20O19O$~418 9V4N94R~N246~38 2600VdIvo Vt&64T460 4~~8$ 27~28ft00 $ 4,140.00 $23~,1i0.00 $ 22,000!00 95.20% Internet

~ 500-2001308-418 4V4ND4RJ0YN246739 2000 Volvo VNL84T-660 706128 $ 21,896.80 $ 5,935,00 $15,961.80 $ 22,500.00 140.96% Auction

~ 5O0-2O130641~ 4V4HCJMO~tN314783~ 2001 VOlvo VP&84T-810 398951 $ 38,3S0.98 $ 8~3O0~00$30,050.98 $ 31,14000 10:3.49% Internet

~ 500-2001308-417 4V4NC9JH21N314764 2001 Volvo VNL64T-610 424645 $ 34,808.88 $ 4,855.00 $29,953.88 $ 25,250.00 84.30% Internet

(~s5O0~20Ot308’4* 4V4NCØJHQINOI4I82 2001 VOlVO VNL64T-610 384954 $ 38,701,15~$ 4~97O~*rS8*~791.15 $ 31,000~O0 97.70% Internet

j4~800-2001308-419 4V4N044H2YN793584 2QQQk~e~ VNL64T~~860 402942 $ 23,146.80 $ 4,840.00 518,506.80 $ 24,000~OG 129.68% Internet ,97 5~2Ø$$~42t~4Y4Nb4RJ0YN796989 2000 Volvo V~4L84t.’680 398958 $ 21,250.00 $ 9,485.00 $17,765.00 $ 23,000.00 129.47% Internet

~~Z~/5500-2001308.4214V4N09TJ33N341958 2003 Volvo VNL84T-610 386311 $ 45,700.00 $ 4,960.00 $40,740.00 $ 39,300.00 96.47% Internet

2Y~500-2001308-421 4V4NC9TJ63N341954 2003 Volvo VNL64T-610 343451 $ 46,361.98 $ 2,235.00 $44,128.96 $ 42,300.00 95.86% Internet

iJf/ 500-2001308-421 4V4NC9TJ43N341953 2003 Volvo VNL64T-610 365011 $ 45,700.00 $ 4,700.00 $41,000.00 $ 40,300.00 98.29% Internet

~1~500~2001308.421 4V4NC9TJ23N341952 2003 Volvo VNL64T-610 389877 $ 45,700.00 $ 7,285.00 $38,435.00 $ 38,000.00 98.87% Internet

2 yq5oo.2001308-421 4V4NC9TJ53N341959 2003 Volvo VNL64T-610 358253 $ 45,769.88 $ 8,200.00 $37,569.88 $ 37,000.00 98.48% Internet

104.61%

S. /C/0~C’ ~ /

- / c1I /~/~(

/ / ~ - c~/~~’ 7 (~~)/2~‘~ ,~

/ (‘~r~” / q ~ ~

7~)~ / 7 ~ o~ ,/

- ~‘//~/~ ~,~qA/~)i1C

~ c (,1~-’) 2 y

/ ~

/ 0 - ~ 5c/~~f2

10) -

j(2~ -

~ S.

1~

/ 55

I (~~~A4/ (~c~~

/ - 7 ~

/ ~

PLAINI1FF’S

EXHIBIT

c~

_ C

1/ >/2~9~~

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-4 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 21 of 34
AS OF :1. - Kelly Company Vehicles

ROAD FIlET

mileage UNIT

429467 100

750125 101

507679 102

541992 103

480868 104

459404 105

584635 106

473007 107

- 509028 108

437448 109

391088 110

819680 117

549270 118

540357 119

559555 120

502609 121

506141 122

534126 123

589075 126

825079 127

567785 128

606456 129

552245 130

671645 131

- 814820 ~32

711651 133

669900 134

PLAINTIFFFS

28,000

15,000

22,500

22,500

22,500

22,500

22,500

22,500

22,500

28,000

28,000

21,000

22,500

22,500

22,500

22,500

22.500

21,000

22,500

22,500

22,500

22,500

22,500

15,000

15,000

12,500

12,500

$ 15,000

$ 24,500

$ 17,000

$ 15,000

$ 19,500

$ 24,500

$ 24,500

$ 6,000

$ 15,500

$ 31,000

$ 7,500

$ 29,250

$ 29,250

$ 29,250

$ 29,250

$ 24,500

$ 29,250

$ 20,000

$ 20,000

$ 15,500

$ 15,500

$ 15,500

$ 15,500

$ 15,500

$ 15,500

$ 15,500

$ 20,500

$ 20,500

$ 15,500

$ 15,500

$ 15,000

$ 20,000

$ 18,000

Id,

41,027

33,472

33,472

33,472

34,571

34,571

32,451

32,452

39,777

41,529

19,087

27,403

27,403

27,403

27,403

27,475

27,147

17,924

17,924

17,924

17,924

17,924

11,795

11,795

11,795

11,795

11,795

17,965

11,795

49,531

17,965

17,965

0

11,795

58,389

0

40,085

40,086

39,840

40,056

17,965

40,056

46,334

46,334

7,877

7,877

7,877 -

7,877

7877

7,877

7,877

5,238

5,238

8,881

8,891

11,795

11,795

11,795

YEAR MAKE SERIAL # model arts ratio engine tires OLV Payoff

2002 VOLVO ~“l325022vn6lO 10 358 cumtn 450 all low pro $

1998 PETE N370711 379 10 373 cat475 22.5 $

2001 VOLVO N325015 vn8lO 10 355 dot 470 $

2001 VOLVO N325013 vnBlO 10 355 dot 470 $

2001 VOLVO M325014 vn8lO 10 355 det 470 $

2001 VOLVO N3Z5018 vn6lO 10 355 dot 470 $

2001 VOLVO N325017 vn6lO 10 355 dot 470 - $

2001 VOLVO N325018 vn8lO 10 355 cumm 450 $

2001 VOLVO N325019 vn8lO 10 355 curnm 450 $

2002 VOLVO N325020 vn8lO 10 355 cumm 450 $

2002 VOIVG P4325021 vn6lO 10 355 cumm 450 $

2001 FRill’ 1095419 CL 120 10 355 del 470 $

2001 VOLVO P4259535 vn6lO 10 355 del 470 $

2001 VOLVO P4259539 vn6lO 10 355 dot410 $

2001 VOLVO N259538 vnBlO 10 355 dat 470 $

2001 VOLVO N259537 vn6lO 10 355 dat 470 $

2001 VOLVO N259538 vn6lO 10 355 del470 $

2001 FRHT LG95420 CL 120 10 355 dot 470 $

2001 VOLVO N259530 vrt8lO 10 355 dot 470 $

2001 VOLVO N259531 vn6lO 10 355 dot 470 $

2001 VOLVO P4259532 vnSlO 10 355 dot 470 $

2001 VdLVO P1269533 vn6lO 10 355 dat 470

2001 VOLVO P1259534 vn6lO 10 355 dot 470 $

1999 FRI-IT LA63817 CL 120 10 355 det47O $

1999 FRHT 1A83816 CL 120 10 355 det4lO $

1998 VOLVO P1751853 wla64tes 10 355 cumm 435 $

1998 VOLVO N751856 wia84tes 10 355 cumm435 $

..765361 .137....,.,1999 FRHT 1A83815 . - CL 120 .~ 10 355 dat430

138 2000 PETE N525273- 379 .. - 10 ~355dot 470

756100 139 - 1998 VOLVO N762064 .vnI84t 10 355 det4lO

610550 140 1999 FRill LA63814 CL 120 10 355 deL430

471044 142 2000 FRill LF00682 FLD 120 13 373 dat 500

729288 144 - 2000 PETE N525274 379 10 355 dot 470

145 - 2~oq~PETE: -N52527$’: - ~319- -.10~-355.dot470

208890 156 1995 VOLVO P4700348 wia64tes 10 355 ~iet470

- 838583 157 1999 FRI-IT 1990691 RD 120 ID 355 det4lO

342627 158 2003 FRHT l.L05827 RD 120 10 358 cat 475

719536 160 1996 VOLVO N7~831D wia64t 10 355 det430

408646 162 2002 FRill 1,145930 Ct. 120 10 358 del 430

491289 163 2002 FRill 1145931 CL 120 10 358 del 430

425057 164 2002 FRHT U45932 CL 120 10 358 deL 430

357206 165 2002 FRHT LJ45933 CL 120 10 355 det430

821183 166 2000 PETE N525276 379 10 355 dat 470

440022 187 2002 FRHT - LJ45934 CL 120 10 358 dot 430

385348 168 2000 VOLVO N246738 vn1860 10 355 dat 473

414166 169 2D00 VOLVO P4246739 vn1660 10 355 deL 430

773554 170 1999 FRill 1985729 FLD 120 10 355 dat430

6569-49 171 1999 FRHT 1985731 FLO 120 10 355 de1430

807388 172 1999 FRHT 1985730 FW120 10 355 del 430

747055 173 1999 FRHT 1985728 FLD 120 10 355 det43O

840063 174 1999 FRHT L985732 FLD 120 10 355 deL 430

810197. 175 1999 FRHT 1985778 FLD12U 10 355 de1430

370758 176 1999 FRi-fl’ 1985771 FIt) 120 10 355 deL 430

818951 177 1999 PETE P4483221 379 10 355 del 470

840585 178 1999 PETE P4483222 379 10 355 dot 470

645241 179 1999 FRHT L986189 RD120 10 355 dot 430

562148 180 1999 FRI-fl L986191 FIb 120 10 355 dat 430

726379 181 1999 FRill’ LA83813 CL 120 10 355 det43D

475573 185 2000 FRHT 1946521 CL 120 10 355 dat 430

682484 186 2000 FRill 1946528 CL 120 10 355 dot 430

(aF1te~V.SS.XPreSS

D 000209

Defendants Dac. Production

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-4 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 22 of 34
‘I.

295828 187 2003 FRill LL05826 Cl,. 120 10 358 dat430 $ 35,500 58,389

662140 188 2000 FRill 1946530 CL 120 10 355 dat430 $ 18000 0

481325 190 2001 VOLVO P4314763 vn 610 10 358 txum’i 450 $ 22,500 48,194

373018 192 2001 VOLVO P4314764 vn 810 10 358 ajnen 450 $ 22,500 48,194

366677 193 2001 VOLVO P1314782 ‘in 610 10 358 cumm 450 $ 22,500 48478

364469 194 2000 VOLVO P1793584 ‘in 610 10 358 cwm~450 $ 22,500 48,217

430238 195 2002 FRHT K98318 FIt) 120 10 358 dot 470 $ 26,400 51,104

380434 196 2002 FRI-IT K96319 RD 120 10 358 dot 470 $ 26.400 51,104

385498 197 2000 VOLVO -P1796689 ‘in 610 10 358 deL 470 $ 20,000 50,441

322334 198 2003 FRill 1165948 FLD 120 10 358 cai435 $ 33,000 62,048.

303829 199 2003 FRHT - LL65949 FLD 120 10 358 cat435 $ 33,000 62,048

297541 200 2003 FRHT 1165950 FIb 120 10 358 cat 435 $ 33,000 62,048

317902 201 2003 FRHT 1165951 FIt)120 10 358 cal 435 -$ 33,000 62,048

328094 202 2003 FRill LL65952 FIb120 10 358 cat 435 $ 33,000 62,048

158108 204 2003 FRill LM01394 FIb 120 10 358 dot 470 - - $ 35,000 62,928

284053 205 2003 FRill I,M01395 FIb120 10 358 dot 470 - $ 33,000 62,928

255194 206 2003 FRHT LM01393- FIb120 10 358 de1470 $ 33,000 62,928

692109 209 1998 FRHT 1,929995 CL 120 10 355 det 430 $ 12,400 0

210,~’~1998FRHT ~I~2a~9G CLI2OJ 10355 dot43O~g’ $ 12400 0

701258 ~‘211 1998 FRill 1629999 CL f20 “ lr’355det430” $ 12,400 0

212 c~~.1998rRHT’ ; L929a98~ Li2O~1O~:35Sdot 430; $ 12,400 0

213 199k FRill ~1~929997~CL12O~10” 355 det43O $ 12400 0

255432 21~ .~“2ôO3I~FkHT LM01396 FLD~120’ 10 3Sñet470L , $ 33,000 61,676

257503 215 2003 FRHT LM01397 FIb 120 10 358 dot 470’ $ 33,000 61,676

188177 216 2003 FRill’ LM01398 FLD 120 10 358 dot 470 $ 35,000 61,676

259177 217 - 2003 FRill LM01399 FLD 120 10 358 dat 470 $ 33,000 62,843

177658. 218 2003 FRHT - LMO1400 FLD 120 10 358 dot 470 $ 35,000 62,843

218121 220 2003 FRHT L~M01401 FIb 120 10 358 del 410 - $ 33,000 82,907

232858 221 2003 FRill LM01402 FLO 120 10 358 dot 470 $ 33,000 82,907

228 .,:: 1998’V0LV0.~P1755424 wIa84teS:,. j9 355- dat43O $ 7,500 0

293948 231 2001 MACK W010327 cx613 13 358 mack 427 $ 31 000 33471

301258 232 2001 MACK ~10324 cx613 13 358 mack 427 $ 31,000 50,646

325687 233 2001 MACK W010325 cx613 13. 358 mack 427 $ 31,000 50,646

- 342557 234 2003 FRIll 1105828 CL 120 10 358 cat 500 $ 35,500 59,737

375157 235 2003 FRHT 1L05829 CL 120 10 358 cat 500 $ 34,000 59,737

275576 236 2003 FRill LL05830 CL 120 - 10 358 cat 500 $ 35,500 59,737

385429 1149 2000 VOLVO N231330 vnl66O 10 358 dat 500 $ 20,000 54,764

276544 237 2003 FRill’ 1105833 CL 120 10 358 cat 500 $ 37,000 60,607

- 392661 236 2003 FRill 1105834 CL 120 10 358 cat 500 ‘ $ 34,000 60,607

374415 -239 2003 FRill 1105836 CL 120 10 358 cat 500 $ 34,000 60,607

367559 - 240 2003 VOLVO P4341952 vn1860 10 358 cinnm 500 $ 42,500 59,901

336664 241 2003 VOLVO P4341953 vn1680 10 358 cumu 500 - $ 42,500 59,901

313114 242 2003 VOLVO P4341954 vnl66O 10 358 cun~n500 $ 42,500 59,901

365092 243 2003 VOLVO P1341958 vnl68O 10 358 cumm 500 $ 42,500 59,901

305502 244 2003 VOLVO P4341 958 vn1860 .10 358 curnm 500 $ 42,500 59,901

425754 245 - 2002 PETE D528976 379 13 358 cat 500 $ 45,000 55,456

96115 246 2004 FRill LMB6494 CL 120 10 358 cat 500 $ 83,000 78,615

101993 247 2004 FRHT LM86496 CL 120 10 358 cat 500 $ 63,000 78,615

126729 248 2004 FRill 1M86497 CL 120 10 358 cat 500 $ 63,000 78,615

107002 249 2004 FRill 1M88498 CI 120 10 358 cat 500 - $ 63,000 78,615

107633 250 2004 FRill 1M96499 CI 120 10 358 cat 500 - $ 63,000 -78,815

- . - $ 2,905,050 $ 3,941,920

the P1ghllg~ttedurtitsare trucks that have been sold to-driver, arid financed.through

~ opeât~is - - -

- , day cabs

98254 111 1999 FRill HB31474 FL 112 10 373 curnn, 370 $ 18,000 22607

~

- - 0000210

Defendant’s Doe. Production

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-4 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 23 of 34
TIMBER

$ 18,000

$ 18,000

$ 18,000

$ 24,000

$ 27,000

$ 28,000

$ 40,000

$ 42,500

$ 42,500

- $ 42,500

14766

14766

14766

38704

44009

56500

57045

59978

59978

$ 316,500 $ 383,119

$ 3,221,550 $ 4,325,039

$ (1,103,489)

1 1007

2 1007

3 911

4 124

5 125

6 135

‘7 136

8 149

9 150

10 151

11 154

‘12 181

13 182

14 183

15. 230

16 2158

1975 Mack 4164

1984 MACK A006070

1988 VOLVO N121643

2001 MACK Wi38380

2001 MACK WI36361

1996 VOLVO N728316

1995 VOLVO P4728317

1996 ,VOLVO ..N7Q2376

2000 VOLVO N871 025

1988 INTL C008843

‘1996 IN’fl. C052358

1998 VOLVO P4728311

1999 PETE P1474297

1999 PETE 0497532

2001 MACK W141343

2003 MACK Wi52521

timber mack 300

timber macic 237

timber curnni 315

Jim muike macIc 460

avondale mack 460

tim davis dat 430

macon dat430

macon del 430

myron volvo 385

loboy cumm 315

ronnie he cumm 435

macen dot 430

monroec dat470

- raca det4lO

mack 350

mr kefty macic 427

0000211

Defendant’s Doc. Production

99569 112 1999 FRill 1-4831489 FL112 10 373 cumm37O

101541 113 1999 FRill 14831476 FL112 10 373 cunvn370

103540 114 1999 FRill 14831473 FL 112 10 373 cumai3lO

97568 115 2000 FRill 11G48364 FI112 10 373 cat4lO

177167 118 2001 MACK W138954 oh 613 10 373 mack 427

257618 146 2001 MACK W137885 ch613 10 373 mack427

225997 152 2003 MACK W152508 oh 613 10 373 mack 427

135295 203 2003 MACK W152514 ch613 10 373 madc427

186052 223 - 2003 MACK W152516 oh 613 10 373 macic427

126466 -224 2003 MACK W152517 oh 813 10 373 macic 421

unit #

1 2155

2 3155

- 3 2157

4 2158

5 2159

6 2180

7 2161

- K-DIESEL - -

year make serial driver trans engine

2000 PETE P1525277 Keith Taft - 13 del470

2003 PETE n589788 Jimmy griffin - 10 cat 475

2004 PETE n864880 charles dean 10 cwmi 450

2004 PETE n864881 faite brantley 10 conu~450

2004 PETE n884882 dalejohnson 10 cumm 450

2005 INTL c205882 chris gregmy 13 comm 450

2005 INTL c210829 lee knight 13 comm 450

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-4 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 24 of 34
Road Trailers

Unit # Year Make Serial # Description OLV Payoff

$ 3,750

$ 3750

$ 3,750

$ 3,750

$ 3750

$ 3,500

$ 3,500

$ 3,500

$ 3,500

$ 3,500

$ 3,500

$ .3,500

$ 3,500 -

$ 3,500

$ 3,500

$ 3,500

$ 3,500

$ 3,500

$ 3,500

$ 3,500

$ 3,500

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

.0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

22 5301

- 23 5382

- 24 5303

- 25 5304

26 5305

27- 5308

28 5307

—29 - 5308

30 5309

31 - 5310

32 5311

33 5312

1994 DORSEY 218834 53 x 102, spring ride -

1994 DORSEY 216835 plywood lined, wood floor

1995 DORSEY 234149

1995 DORSEY 234140

1995 DORSEY 234151

1995 DORSEY 234142

1995 DORSEY - 234154

1995 -DORSEY 234148

- 1995 DORSEY 234147

1995 DORSEY 234153

1995 DORSEY 234152 -

1995 DORSEY 234150

$ 4,750

$ 4,750

$ 5,250

$ 5,250

- $ 5,250

$ . 5,250

$ 5,250 -

$ 5,250

$ 5,250

$ 5,250

$ 5,250

$ 5,250

D000212

Defendant’s Doe. Production

1 1860 1995 DORSEY 230679 48 ft x 102, spring ride

2 1881 1995 DORSEY 230678 plywood lined, wood floor

3 1862 1995 DORSEY 230675

4 1864 1995 DORSEY 230676

5 1865 1996 DORSEY 230677

6 1880 1994 DORSEY 221872

7 1881 1984 DORSEY 221873

8 1882 1994 DORSEY 221874

9 1883 1994 DORSEY 221877

10 1884 1994 DORSEY 221878

11 1885 1994 DORSEY 222973

- 12 1687 1994 DORSEY 222974

13 1888 - 1994 DORSEY 222975

14 1889 1994 DORSEY 222976

15 1890 -1994 DORSE’? 222977

16 1891 1994 DORSEY 222978

17 1893 1994 STOLIGH 888909

18 1895 1994 STOUGH 888905

19 1898 1994 STOUGH. 888906

20 - 1897 1984 STOUGH 888908

21 1898 1994 SlOUGH 888907

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

34 5323 1997 WABASH 424489 53 x 102, spring ride $ 7,250 - 2,815

35 5324 1997 WABASH 424482 plywood lined, paper spec $ 7,250 2,815

36 - 5325 1997 WABASH 424488 8 inch crossmembers $ 7,250 2,615

37 5328 1997 WABASH 424485 wood floor S 7,250 2,615

38 5327 1997 WABASH 424492 5 - 7,250 2,615

39 5328 1997 WABASH 424490 $ - 7,250 2,815

40 5329 1997 WABASH 424489 - $ - 7,250 2,615

41 5330

- 5331

1997 WABASH 424494 5 7,250 2,615

42 1997 WABASH 424495 5 7,250 2,615

43 5332 1997 WABASH 424484 S 7,250 2,615

44 5333 1997 WABASH 424493 - S 7,250 2,615

45 5334 1997 WABASH 424483 $ - 7,250 2,615

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-4 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 25 of 34
46 5335 1997 WABASH 424491 $ 7,250 2,615

47 53.36 1997 WABASH 424480 $ 7,250 2,815

48 - 5337 1997 WABASH 424488 $ 7,250 2,615

49 5338 1997 WABASH 424479 $ 7,250 2,615,

50 5339 1997 WABASH 424472 S 7,250 2,615

51 5340 1997 WABASH 424486 $ 7,250 2,615

52 - 5341 1987 WABASH 424487 $ 7,250 2,615

53 5342 1997 WABASH 424517 $ 7,250 2,615

54 5343 1997 WABASH 424508 $ 7,250 2,615

55 5344 1997 WABASH 424498 $ 7,250 2,615

58 5345 1997 WABASH 424501 $ 7,250 2,815

57 5346 1997 WABASH 424510 $ 7,250 2,615

58 5347 1997. WABASH 424497 $ 7,250 2,615

59 5348 1997 WABASH 424504 $ 7,250 2,615

60 5349 1997 WABASH 424509 $ 7,260 - 2,615

61 5350 1997 WABASH 424496 $ 7,250 2,815

62 5351 1997 WABASH 424511 - $ 7,250 2,615

63 - 5352 1997 WABASH 424505 $ 7,250 2,615

64 5353 -- 1997 WABASH 424477 $ 7,250 2,615

65 5354 1997 WABASH 424506 $ 7,250 2,615

68 5355 1997 WABASH 424512 $ 7,250 2,615

67 5358 1997 WABASH 424470 $ 7,250 2,615

68 5357 1997 WABASH 424478 $ 7,250 2,615

69 5358 1997 WABASH 424502 $ 7,250 2,615

70 5359 1997 WABASH 424515 $ 7,250 2,615

71 5380 1997 WABASH 424499 $ 7,250 2,615

72 5381 1997 WABASH 424474 - - 5 7,250 2,615

73 5362 1997 WABASH 424473 - $ 7,250 - 2,615

74 5363 1997 WABASH 424516 - - $ 7,250 2,615

75 5364 1999 WABASH 614860 $ 9,250 2,615

76 5365 ‘1997 WABASH 424476 $ - - 7,250 2,615

77 5366 - 1997 WABASH 424475 $ 7,250 2,615

78 - 5367 1997 WABASH 424503 - $ 7,250 - - 2,615

79 5368 1997 WABASH 424514 - 5 7,250 2,615

-80 5389. 1997 WABASH 424471 - $ - 7,250 2,615

81 5370 1997 WABASH 424513 $ 7,250 2,615

82 5371 1997 WABASH 424500 $ 7,250 2,615

83 5372 1997 -WABASH 424607 5 .7,250 2,615

84 5373 1997 WABASH 424527 55 - $ 7,250. 2,615

85 5374 1997 WABASH 424520 $ 7,260 2,615

86 5375 1997 WABASH 424529 - $ 7,250 2,815

87 5376 - 1997 WABASH 424521 $ 7,250 2,615

88 5377 1997 WABASH 424519 - . $ 7,250 2,615

89 5376 1997 WABASH 424522 $ 7,250 2,615

90 5379 1997 WABASH 424523 - $ 7,250 2,615

91 5380 1997 WABASH 424525 $ 7,250 2,615

92 5381 1997 WABASH 424528 $ 7,250 2,615

93 - 5382 1997 WABASH 424531 $ 7,250 2,615

94 5383 1997 WABASH 424532 $ 7,250 2,615

95 5384 1897 WABASH 424526 - 5 7,250 2,615

96 5385 1997 WABASH 424524 $ 7,250 2,615

97 5388 1997 WABASH 424530 $ 7,250 2,615

98 -5387 1997 WABASH 424518x $ 7,250 2,615

55 D000213

Defendant’s Dcc. Production

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-4 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 26 of 34
99 5391 1996 HYUNDAI 9122 53 x 102, spring ride $ 5,000 - 0

100 5392 1996 HVUNDAI 9206 plywood Uned wood floor $ 5,000 0

101 5393 1998 HYUNDAI 9315 $ 5,000 0

102 5394 1996 HYUNDAI 9307 $ 5,000 0

103 5396 1996 HYUNOAI 9316 $ 5,000 0

104 5398 1998 HYUNDAI 9305 $ 5,000 0

105 5397 1996 HYUNDAI 9224 $ 5,000 0

106 5398 - ‘1998 HYUNDAI -9033 $ 5,000 - 0

107 - 5399 1998 HYUNDAI - 9089 - $ 5,000 0

108 53135 1998 FRUH 474051 53x 102, spring ride $ ~— 0

109 - 53136 1998 FRUH 474057 plywood lined, wood floor $ 0

110 53137 1998 FRUH - 474048 - $ 0

111 53143 1998 FRUH 474054 Luikin paid $ - 0

112 53144 1998 FRUH 474050 SOLD $ 0

113 53145 1998 FRUH 474053 $ :~- 0

114 53147 1998 FRUH 474049 $ 0

115 53150 1998 FRUN 474074 $ 0

118 53151 1998 FRUH 474055 $ 0

117 53152 1998 FRUH 474052 - - $ 0

118 53155 1998 FRUH 474056 $ 0

119 53157 1998 FRUH 474073 - $ 8,000 0

.120 53160 1998. FRUH 474075 5 8,000 0

121 53170 1998 FRUH 474080 $ 8,000 0

122 53174 - 1998 FRUI-I -474081 $ 8,000 0

123 53181 1998 FRUH 481038 - - S 0

124 - 53182 1998 FRUH 481046 - $ 0

125 53183 1998 FRUH 481039 Lufkin paid $ 0

126 53184 1998 FRUH 481038 SOLD 5. 0

127 53185 1998 FRUH 481037 $ - 0

128 53186 1998 FRUH 481044 - $ 0

129 53187 1998 FRUH - 461040 $ 0

130 53188 1998 FRUH 481049 - $ 0

131 53189 1998 FRUH 481047 $ 0

132 53190 - 1998 FRUH 481051 $ 0

133 ~3191 - 1998 FRUH 481048 $ - 0

134 53192 1998 FRUH 481054 $ 0

135 - 53193 1998 FRUH 481053 - $ - 0

136 53194 1998 FRUH 481052 - $ 0

137 53198 1998 FRUH 481045 $ 0

138 53199 1998 FRUH 481050 - S 0

139 53200 1998 FRUH 481042 $ 0

140 53201 1998 FRUH 481043 $ 1 0

141 53202 1998 FRUH 481055 $ 0

142 53203 1998 FRUH 481041 S 0

143 53204 1998 FRUH 481069 $ - 0

144 - 53205 1998 FRUH 481059 $ - 0

—F:~ll~u.s.xp~ess

- 0000214

DefendanrS Dcc. Production

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-4 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 27 of 34
145 53206

146 53207

147 53208

148 53209

149 - 53210

150 53211

151 53212

152 53213

153 53214

154 53215

- 155 53216

156 53217

157 53218-

158 53219

159 53220

160 53221

161 53222

‘162 53223

1998 FRUH

1998 FRUH

1998 FRUH

1998 FRUH

1998 FRUH

1998 FRUH

1998 FRUH

1998 FRUH

1998 FRUH

1998 FRUH

1998 FRUH

1998 FRUH

1998 FRUH

1998 FRUH

1998 FRLIH

1998 FRUH

1998 FRUH

1998 FRUH

481065 GFK paid

481081 Sold to Craig Elliott

481068

481071

481073

481075

481074

481068

481077

481078

481070

481062

481060

481072

481067

481078

481084

481063

$ .~- 0

$ ~‘- 0

$ :_- - 0

$ -- 0

$ 0

$ -- 0

$ :-. 0

$ ~-:- 0

S ~. 0 -

$ -~ 0

$ 1- 0

55$ ~ 0

$ :-- 0

$ 0

$ ~- 0

$ 0

$ 0

$ ~ 0

51 7~J4- Ale ~V ~

193 53301 1999 WABASH 527614 Plate Trailers, spring ride $ 9,250 8,601

‘GFKeIl~USXpress

0 000215

163 53271 1999 WABASH 534634 Platetrailers $ 9,500 6,425

164 53272 1999 WABASH 534635 53 x 102, spring ride 5 9,500 6,425

185 53273 1999 WABASH 534636 alum floor, paper spec S 9,500 6,425

168 53274 1999 WABASH 534637 8 inch crossmembers 5 9,500 8,425

167 53275 1999 WABASH 534638 skilights S 9,500 6,425

- 168 - 53276 1999 WABASH 534639 S 9,500 6,425

- 169 - - 53277 - 55 1999 WABASH 534640 5 - 9,500 6,425

170 53278 1999 WABASH 534641 - $ 9,500 6,425

171 53279 1999 WABASH 534642 5 9,500 6,425

172 53280 1998 WABASH 534843 - 5 9,500 8,425

173 53281 1999 WABASH 534644 55 S 9,500 6,425

174 53282 1999 WABASH 534845 air-ride - $ 11,000 8,425

175 53283 1999-WABASH 534646 5 9,500 6,425

- 176 53284 1999 WABASH 534847 $ 9,500 6,425

177 53285 1999 WABASH 534648 $ 9,500 6,425

- 178 - 53286 1999 WABASH 534849 - 5 9,500 6,425

179 53287 1999 WABASH 534650 5 9,500 6,425

180 53288 1999 WABASH 534851 $ 9,500 6,425

181 53289 1999 WABASH 534852 $ - 9,500 6,425

182 53290 1999 WABASH 534653 - 5 9,500 8,425

- 183 53291 1999 WABASH 534654 5 9,500 6,425

184 53292 1999 WABASH 534655 $ 9,500 6,425

185 - 53293 1999 WABASH 534656 S 9,500 6,425

186 53294 1999 WABASH 534657 air-ride - 5 11,000 6,425

187 53295 1999 WABASH 534658 - $ 9,500 6,425

188 53296 1999 WABASH 534659 5 9,500 6,425

189 - 53297 1999 WABASH 534660 S 9,500 6,425

, 190 53298 1999 WABASH 534661 - $ 9,500 6,425

191 53299 1999 WABASH 534662 5 9,500 6,425

192 53300 1999 WABASH 534663 x $ 9,500 6,425

Defendant’s Doe. Production

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-4 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 28 of 34
194 53302

19-5 53303

196 53304

197 53305

198 53306

199 53307

- 200 53308

201 53309

202 53310

203 - 53311

204 53312

205 53313

206 53314

207 53315

208 53316

209 53317

210 - 53318

211 53319

212 5332O

213 - 53321

214 53322

215 53323

216 53324

217 53325

218 - 53349

219 53350

220 53351

221 - 53352

222 53353

223 53354

- 224 53355

235 3356 1992 G-DANE SOl 3139 Plate Trailers, spring ride

236 3357 1994 STRICK 367550 wood floor,

237 3358 - .1994 STRICK 367535 53 x 102 GFK paid

238 - 3359 1994 STRICK 367495 Sold

239 - 3360 1994 STRIC}< 387540 -

240 3361 1994 STRICK 367582 x

9,250

9,250

9,250

9,250

9,250

9,250

9,250

9,250

9,250

9,250

9,250

9,250

9,250

9,250

9,250

9,250

9,250

9,250

9,250

9,250

9,250

9,250

9,250

9,250

$ 12,000

$ 12,000

$ 12,000

$ 12,000

$ 12,000

$ 12,000

$ 12,000

$2500

S ~t~S6-~--

$ ~ : -

$ 55+150

S #‘5~ — *

-~

8,601

8,601

8,601

8,601

8,601

8,601

8,601

8,601

8,801

8,601

8,801

8,601

8,601

8,801

8,801

8,801

8,601

8,601

8,601

8,601

8,601

8,601

8,601

8,601

11,374

11,374

11,374

11,374

11,374

11,374

11,374

2~-’

0000216

Defendant’s Dcc. Production

1999 WABASH 527621 tiecups, ski lights, wood floor $

1999 WABASH 527808 paper spec $

1999 WABASH 527605 53 x 102 $

1999 WABASH 527608 $

1999 WABASH 527618 $

1999 WABASH 527813 $

1989 WABASH 527609 $

1999 WABASH 527622 $

1999 WABASH 527610 $

1998 WABASH 527629 $

1999 WABASH 527620 $

1998 WABASH 527618 $

1999 WABASH 527612 - $

1999 WABASH 527628 $

1998 WABASH 527827 $

1999 WABASH 527625 - $

1999 WABASH 521611 $

1999 WABASH 527615 - $

1999 WABASH 527819 - $

1999 WABASH 527607 $

1998 WABASH 527623 - $

1999 WABASH 527824 $

1999 WABASH 527628 $

1999 WABASH 527817x $

2000 WABASH 676245 Plate Trailers,, air ride

2000 WABASH 676246 tie cups,alum floor

2000 WABASH 676247 paper spec

2000 WABASH 676248 ski lights

2000 WABASH 676249 53 x 102

2000 WABASH 678250 -

2000 WABASH 676251 x

2000 WABASH 883649 Plate Trailers, air ride

2000 WABASH 683651 alum floor, paper spec

2000 WABASH 683850 ski lights

2000 WABASH 683652 53 x 102

2000 WABASH 683648

2000 WABASH 683644 -

2000 WABASH 683645

2000 WABASH 683643

2000 WABASH 683647 -

2000 WABASH 683648 x

225 53356

- - 226 53357

227 - 53358

228 53359

.229 53380

230 53361

231 53362

232 53383

233 53364

234 53365

$ 12,000

$ 12,000

$ 12,000

$~ 12,000

$ 12,000

$ 12,000

$ 12,000

$ 12,000

$ 12,000

$ 12,000

10,951

10,951

10,951

10,951

10,951

10,951

10,951

10,951

- 10,951

10,951

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-4 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 29 of 34
241 - 53366

242 53367

243 53368

244 53369 -

245 53370

248 53371

247 53372

248 53373

249 53374

250 53375

2001 LUFKIN

2001 LUFKIN

2001 LUFKIN

2001 LUFKIN

2001 LUFKIN

2001. LUFKIN

2001 LUFKIN

2001 LUFKIN

2001 LUFKIN

2001 LUFKIN

S 11,000

$ 11,000

$ 11,000

$ 11,000

$ 11,000

$ 11,000

$ 11,000

$ 11,000

$ 11,000

$ 11,000

15,490

15,490

15,490

15,490

15,490

15,490

15,490

15,490

15,490

15,490

251 53376

252 53377

253 53378

254 53379

255 53380

256 53381

257 53382

258 53383

259 53384

260 53385

261 53386

262 53387

.263 53388

264 53389

265 53390

266 53391

267 53392

268 53393

269 53394

270 53395

271 - 53388

272 53397

273 53398

274 53399

275 53400

276. 53401

278 53402

2-79 53403

280 53404

281 53405

282 53406

283 53407

284 - 53408

285 5~409

286 53410

287 53411

288 53412

289 53413-

290 53414

2001 LUFKIN 147246

2001 LUFKIN 147274

2001 LUFKIN 147273

2001 LUFKIN 147265

2001 LUFKIN 147278-

2001 LUEKIN 147256

2001 LUFKJN 147257

2001 LUFKIN 147269

2001 LUFKIN 147253

2001 LUFKIN 147266

2001 LUFKIN 147275

2001 LUFKIN 147270

2001. LUFKIN 1472’71

2001 LUFK1N 147255

2001 LUFKIN 147251

2001 LUFKIN 147261

2001 WFKIN 147248

2001 LUFKIN 147258

2001 LUFKIN - 147260

2001 LUFKIN 147247

2001 LUFKIN 147252

2001 LUFKJN 147240

2001 LUFKIN- 147245

2001 LUFKIN 147276

2001 LUFKIN 147250

2001 LUFKIN 147277

2001 LUFKIN 147267

2001 LUFKIN 147242

2001 LUFKIN 147244

2001 LUFKIN 147241

2001 LUFKIN 147262

2001 LUFKIN 147283

2001 LUFKIN 147243

2001 LUFKIN - 147264

2001 LUFK1N 147279

2001 LUFKIN 147254

2001 LUFKIN 147272

2001 LUFKIN 147268

2001 LUFKIN 247259

$ 11,000

$ 11,000

$ 11,000

$ 11,000

$ 11,000

$ 11,000

$ 11,000

$ 11,000

$ 11,000

$ 11,000

$ 11,000

$ 11,000

$ 11,000

S 11,000

$ 11,000

$ 11,000

$ 11,000

$ 11,000

$ 11,000

$ 11,000

$ 11,000

$ 11,000

$ 11,000

$ 11,000

$ ‘11,000

S 11,000

$ 11,000

$ 11,000

$ 11,000

$ 11,000

S 11,000

$ 11,000

$ 11,000

$ 11,000

$ 11,000

$ 11,000

$ 11,000

$ 1-1,000

$ 11,000

11,542

11,542

11,542

11,542

11,542

11,542 -

11,542

11,542

11,542

11,542

11542

11,542

11,542

11,542

11,542

11,542

11,542

11,542

11,542

11,542

11,542

11,542

11,542

11,542

11,542

- 11,542

11,542

11,542

11,542

11,542

11,542

11,542

11,542

11,542

11,542

11,542

11,542

11,542

11,542

‘~ ~TFKeI lT,~press

0000217

Defendant’s Dcc. Producbon

149318 53 x 102, spring ride

149309 logistics post, paper spec

149310 wood floor, vented

149317 plywood lined

149315

-149318

149312

149311

149313 -

149314

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-4 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 30 of 34
291 53415 2001 LUFKJN 147249 - $ 11,000 11,542

292 53416 2001 LUFKIN 1479~7 - 5 11,000 2,726

293 53417 2001 LUFKIN 147925 $ 11,000 2,728

294 53418 2001 LUFKIN 147923 $ 11,000 2,726

295 53419 2001 LUFKIN 147927 $ 11,000 2,726

296 53420 2001 LUFKIN 147916 $ 11,000 2,728

297 - 53421 2001 WFKIN 147928 $ 11,000 - 2,726

298 53422 2001 LUFKJN 147259 - $ 11,000 - 2,726

299 53423 2001 LUFKIN 147924 $ 11,000 2,728

300 53424 2001 LUFKIN 47918 $ 11,000 13,152

301 53425 -2001 LUFKIN 47919 - $ 11,000 13,152

302 53426- 2001 LUFKIN 47920 $ 11,000 13,152

303 53427 2001 LUFKIN 47921 $ 11,000 13,152

304 53428 2001 LUFKIN 47922 $ 11,000 13,152

305 53429 2002 LUEKIN 50005 - $ 12,500 13,152

308 53430 2002 LUFKIN 50008 ‘ $ 12,500 13,152

307 53431 2002 LUFKIN 50007 - $ 12,500 13,152

308 53432 2002 LUFKIN 50008 S. 12,500 13,152

309 53433 2002 LUFKIN 50009 $ 12,500 13,152

310 53434 2002 LUFKIN 50010 $ 12,500 13,152

311 53435 2002 LUFKIN 50011 $ 12,500 ‘ 13,152

312 53438 2002 LUFKIN 50012 $ 12,500 13,152

313 53437 2002 LIJFKIN 50013 $ 12,500 13,152

314 53438 2002 LUFKIN 50014 $ .12,500 13,152

315 53439 2002. LUFKIN 50015 - $ 12,500 13,152

316 53440 2002 LUFKIN 50016 - $ 12,500 13,152

317 - 53441 2002 LUFKIN 50017 - $ 12,500 13,152

318 53442 2002 LUFKIN 50018 $ 12,500 13,152

318 53443 2002 LUFKIN 50019 $ 12,500 13,152

320 53444 2002 LUFKIN 50020 - $ 12,500 13,152

321 53445 2002 LUFKIN 50021 $ 12,500 13,152

322 53446 - 2002 LUFKIN 50022 - $ 12,500 13,152

-324 53447 2002 LUFKIN 50023 - - $ 12,500 13,152

325 53448 - 2002 LUFKIN . 50024 $ 12,500 13,152

326 53449 2002 LUFKIN 50025 $ 12,500 13,152

327 53450 2002 LUFKIN 50026 $ 12,500 13,152

328 - 53451 2002 LUFKIN 50027 - $ 12,500 13,152

329 53452 2002 LUFKIN 50028 $ 12,500 13,152

330 53453 2002 LUFKIN 50029 x - $ 12,500 13,152

331 53454 2003 LUFKIN 151572 53 x 102, spring ride - $ 14,000 14,934

332 53455 , 2003 LUFKIN 151573 paper spec, vented $ 14,000 14,934

333 53456 2003 LUFKIN 151574 logistics post, composite lined $ 14,000 14,934

334 53457 2003 LUFKIN 151575 wood floor - $ 14,000 14,934

335 - 53458 2003 LUFKIN 151576 ‘ $ 14,000 - 14,934

336 53459 2003 LUFKIN 151577 $ 14,000 14,934

337 53460 2003 LUFKIN 151578 $ 14,000 14,934

338 53461 2003 LUFKIN 151579 $ 14,000 14,934

~RilIS~prési’

0000218

- Defendanrs Doe. Production

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-4 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 31 of 34
339 53462 2003 LUFKIN 151580 $ 14,000 14,934

340 53463 2003 LUFKIN 151581 $ 14,000 14,934

341 53464 2003 LUFKIN 151582 . $ 14,000 14,934

342 53485 2003 LUFKIN 151583 $ 14,000 14,934

343 53468 2003 LUFKIN 151584 $ 14,000 14,934

345 53487 2003 LUFKIN 151585 $ 14,000 14,934

345 53468 2003 LUFKIN 151588 $ 14,000 14,934

347 53489 2003 LUFKIN 151587 $ 14,000 - 14,934

348 - 53470 2003 LUFKIN 151588 $ 14,000 14,934

349 53471 2003 LUFKIN 151589 $ 14,000 14,934

350 53472 2003 LUFKIN 151590 $ 14,000 14,934

351 53473 2003 LUFKIN 151591 - $ 14,000 14,934

352 53474 2003 LUFKIN 151592 - $ 14,000 14,934

353 53475 2003 LUFKIN 151593 $ 14,000 14,934

354 53476 2003 LUFKIN 151594 $ 14,000 14,834

355 53477 2003 LUFKJN 151595 $ 14,000 14,934

356 53478 2203 LUFKIN 151596 $ 14,000 14,934

357 53479 2003 LUFKIN 151597 , $ 14,000 14,934

358 53480 2003 LUFKIN 151598 $ 14,000 14,934

359 53481 2003 LUFKIN 151599 $ 14,000 14,934’

360 53482 2Q03 LUFKIN 151600 $ 14,000 14,934

361 53483 2003 L1*KIN 151601 - - $ 14,000 14,934

362 - 53484 2003 LUFKIN 151602 $ 14,000 14,934

363 53485 2003 LUFKIN 151603 $ 14,000 14,934

364 53486 2003 LUFKIN 151804 - $ 14,000 14,934

- 365 53487 2003 LUFKIN 151605 $ 14,000 14,934

- 366 53488 2003 LUFKIN - 151606 $ 14,000 14,934

387 53489 2003 LUFKIN 151607 $ 14,000 14,934

368 53490 2003 LUFK1N 151608 ‘ $ 14,000 14,934

369 53491 2003 LUFKIN 151609 $ 14,000 14,934

370. 53492 2003 LUFKIN 151610 - $ 14,000 - 14,934

371 ‘ 53493 2003 LUFKIN - 151811 $ 14,000 - 14,934

372 53494 2003 LUFKIN 151612 - $ 14,000 14,934

373 53495 2003 LUFKIN 151613 $ 14,000 14,934

374 53496 2003 LUFKIN 151814 S 14,000 14,934

375 53497 2003 LUFKIN 151615 , 5 14,000 14,934

378 53498 2003 LUFKIN 151616 $ 14,000 14,934

• 377 53499 2003 LUFKIN 151617 - $ 14,000 14,934

378 53500 2003 LUFKIN 151618 $ 14,000 14,934

379 53501 2003 LUFKIN 151619 $ - 14,000 14,934

380 53502 . 2003 LUFKIN 151620 $ 14,000 14,934 -

381 53503 2003 LUFKIN 151621 x $ 14,000 14,934

382 • 53504 2003 LUFKIN 151048 53 x 102, spring ride $ 14,000 16,984

383 53505 2003 LUFKIN 151049 paper spec, vented - $ 14,000 16,984

384 53508 2003 LUFKIN 151050 logistics post composite lined $ 14,000 16,984

385 53507 2003 LUFKIN ‘ 151051 wood floor $ - 14,000 16,984

— 386 53508 2003 LUFKIN 151052 - $ 14,000 - 16,984

387 53509 2003 LLJFKIN 151053 $ 14,000 16,984

388 53510 2003 LUFKIN 151054 $ 14,000 18,984

389 53511 2003 LUFKIN 151055 $ 14,000 16,984

390 53512 2003LUFKIN 151058 $ 14,000 18,984

391 53513 2003 LUFKIN 151057 $ 14,000 16,984

D 000219

Defend9fl~SDoe. Production

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-4 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 32 of 34
53326

53327

53328

53329

53330

53331

53332

53333

53334

53335

53336

53337

53338

53339

533.40

53341

53342

53343

53344

533,45

1999 WABASH 676222

1999 WABASH 676223

1999 WABASH 676224

1999 WABASH 676225

1999 WABASH 676228

1999 WABASH 676227

1999 WABASH 676228

1999 WABASH 676229

1999 WABASH 676230

1999 WABASH 676231

1999 WABASH 676232

1999 WABASH 676233

1999 WABASH 676234

1999 WABASH - 676235

1999 WABASH 878236

1999 WABASH 676237

1999 WABASH 676238

1999 WABASH 676239

1999 WABASH 676240

1999 WABASH 676241

$ ~DV 0

$ T” 0

$ -‘55 0

$ 0

$ ~ 0

$ --.~ .0

$ - 0

$ - 0

$ - .0

‘S ‘- -, 0

jor~~4,~J~~O.6~’

$ 9,500

$ 9,500

-$ 9,500

$ 9,500

$ 9,500

$ 9,500

5 9,500

$ 9,500

$ 9,500

$ 9,500

$ - 9,500

$ 9,500

$ 9,500

$ 9,5o0

$ 9,500

$ 9,500

$ 9,500

$ 9,500

$ 9,500

$ 9,500

-~G:F:~II~Tu:s:~ress

D 000220

Defendant’s Doe. Production

2003 LUFKIN 151058

2003 LUFKIN 151059

2003 LUFKIN • 151060

2003 LUFKIN 151061

2003 LUFKIN 151082

2003 LUFKIN 151083

2003 LUFKIN 151064

2003 LUFKIN 1~51085

2003 LUFKIN 151086

2003 LUFKIN- 151067

2003 LUFKIN 151088

2003 LUFKIN 151089

2003 LUFKIN 151070

2003 LUFKIN 151071

2003 LUFKIN 11072

2003 LUFKIN 151073

2003 LUEKIN 151074

2003 WFKIN 151075

2003 LUFKIN 151076

2003 LUFKIN 151077

392 53514

393 53515

394 53516

395 53517

396 53518

397 53519

398 53520

399 53521

400 53522

• 401 53523

402 53524

403 53525

404 53528

405 53527

408 53528

407 - 53529

408 53530

409 53531

410 53532

411 53533

412 53534

413 53535

414 53536

415 53537

41.6 - 53538

417 53539

418 53540

419 53541

420 - 53542

421 53543

$ 14,000

$ 14,000

$ 14,000

$ 14,000

$ 14,000

$ 14,000

$ 14,000

$ 14,000

$ 14,000

$ 14,000

$ 14,000

$ 14,000

5 14,000

$ 14,000

$ 14,000

$ 14,000

$ 14,000

$ 14,000

$ 14,000

$ 14,000

17,152

17,152

17,152

17,152

17,152

17,152

17,152 -

17,152

17,1 52

17,152

17,152

17,152

17,152

17,152

17,152

17,152

17,152

17,152

17,152 -

17,1 52

2003 LUFKIN

2003 LUFKIN

2003 LUFKIN

2003 LUFKIN

2003 LUFKIN

2003 LUFKIN

2003 LUFKIN

2003 LUFKIN

2003 LUFKIN

2003 LUEKIN

151078

151079 Lufkin paid

151080

151081

151082 Lufkinpaid

151083

151084

151085

151088

151087

12,184

12,184 -

1 ~,184

12,184

12,184

12,184

12,184 -

12,1 84

12,184

12,184

12,184

12,184

12,184

12,184

12,184

12,184

12,184

12,184

12,184

12,184

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-4 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 33 of 34
533,46 1999 WABASH 878242 $ 9,500 12,184

53347 1999 WABASH 676243 $ 9,500 12,184

53348 1999 WABASH 676244 . $ 9,500 12184

$ 3,754,250 $ 3,339,638

• $ 414,612

~ ‘~7U1“~

‘~~Ke v.tJS. XpresS

D 000221

Defendanrs Dcc. Producton

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-4 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 34 of 34
EXHIBIT D

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-5 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 1 of 2
Kefly~s

Estimated

yIN # u.s. Xpress Price Actual Sale +1- Value

013 22500.00 27000 4500

015 22500.00 26000 3500 32000.00

014 22500.00 31000 8500

016 22500.00 23000 500

017 22500.00 25000 2500

018 22500.00 21000 -1500 3200.00

019 22500.00 24000 1500 32000.00

020 28000.00 26670 -1330 36000.00

021 28000.00 28000 0 38000.00

738 20000.00 22000 2000

739 20000.00 22000 2000 27000.00

763 22500.00 21100 8600

764 22500.00 25520 3020 34000.00

762 22500.00 31000 8500

584 22500.00 24000 1500

989 20000.00 23000 3000

958 42500.00 38000 -4500 51000.00

954 42500.00 40300 -200 52000.00

953 42500.00 42500 -200 51000.00

952 42500.00 39300 -3200 49000.00

959 42500.00 37000 -5500 49000,00

Library: BIRMDOCS

Document Name: Table.XLS

Document Number: 745443 Version: v1

Document Author: JAC2

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 28-5 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 2 of 2