alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
McCombs Realty Partners, Ltd. 1998 Second Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified 
in its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000759198
<NAME> MCCOMBS REALTY PARTNERS, LTD.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998   
<CASH>                                             368
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       71
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                           5,915
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,362)   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,429   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                          5,699     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0     
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,407)    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,429    
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   694    
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   739    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 241    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (45)     
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.59)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
#### § 58.214 General construction, repair and installation.

All equipment and utensils necessary to the manufacture of dry milk products, including pasteurizer, timing-pump or device, flow diversion valve and recorder controller, shall meet the same general requirements as outlined in § 58.128 of this subpart. In addition, for certain other equipment the following requirements shall be met.
Case 1:03-cv-00734-MEF-SRW Document 21 Filed 08/30/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:03-cv-00734-MEF-SRW Document 21 Filed 08/30/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:03-cv-00734-MEF-SRW Document 21 Filed 08/30/2006 Page 3 of 3
#### § 75.24 Disposition of inspection certificate.

Upon issuance, the original and one copy of each inspection certificate shall be delivered or mailed to the applicant or otherwise delivered or mailed in accordance with the applicant's instructions. One copy of each inspection certificate shall be filed in the Federal Seed Laboratory. In case of a lost or destroyed certificate, a duplicate thereof labeled as such may be issued under the same number, date, and name.
#### In the Matter of the Petition of Charles F. Hunter, Executor, etc., to Vacate an Assessment.

(Argued June 17, 1884;

decided June 24, 1884.)

*JD. J. Deem*for appellant.

*Herbert A. Shipmcm*for respondent.

Agree to affirm ; no opinion.

All concur.

Order affirmed.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3054 

To suspend temporarily the duty on synthetic staple fiber. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. CARPER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on synthetic staple fiber. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SYNTHETIC STAPLE FIBER. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.55.06 Synthetic staple fiber of polyester; cruciform (tetralobal) cross section, measuring less than 3.3 decitex, carded, 

combed or prepared for spinning (provided for in subheading 5506.20.00) ....... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


sroberts on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•S 3054 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0541

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

BEAU AVIDIYA,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 25, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 19 2023

07/19/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0541
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

§ 800.83 Sampling provisions by kind of movement. ( a ) *Export cargo movements* — ( 1 ) *Bulk grain.* Except as may be approved by the Administrator on a shipment-by-shipment basis in an emergency, each inspection for official grade, official factor, or official criteria on an export cargo shipment of bulk grain shall be performed on official samples obtained from the grain ( i ) as the grain is being loaded aboard the final carrier;
( ii ) after the final elevation of the grain prior to loading and as near to the final loading spout as is physically practicable (except as approved by the Administrator when representative samples can be obtained before the grain reaches the final loading spout); and
( iii ) by means of a diverter-type mechanical sampler approved by the Service and operated in accordance with instructions. If an approved diverter-type mechanical sampler is not properly installed at an elevator or facility as required, each certificate issued at that elevator or facility for an export cargo shipment of bulk grain shall show a statement indicating the type of approved sampling method used, as prescribed in the instructions.
( 2 ) *Sacked grain.* Each inspection for official grade, official factor, or official criteria on an export cargo shipment of sacked grain shall be performed on official samples obtained from the grain by any sampling method approved by the Service and operated in accordance with instructions.
( b ) *Other movements.* Each inspection for official grade, official factor, or official criteria on a domestic cargo movement (“In,” “Out,” or en route barge movement), a movement in a land carrier (any movement in a railcar, truck trailer, truck/trailer combination, or container), or a “LOCAL” movement of bulk or sacked grain shall be performed on official samples obtained from the grain by any sampling method approved by the Service and operated in accordance with the instructions.
[50 FR 49670, Dec. 4, 1985]
162 So.2d 575

#### Elta Hogan MATHERNE, Sidney Hogan and Joseph Hogan v. Irion J. BORDELON, Sr.

No. 47200.

April 17, 1964.

In re: Irion J. Bordelon, Sr. applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson. 160 So.2d 844.

Writ refused. On the facts.found by the Court of Appeal we find no error of law in its judgment.
|   | Exhibit 31.1 |
|--------|--------------|

 

 

**SOX 302 CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Tommy Harris, Senior Vice President of CitiMortgage, Inc., certify that:

 

 

1.            I have reviewed the reports on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust Inc., Series 2006-AR7 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.            Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.            Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by the report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.            I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the master servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted inpreparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodicreports, the master servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement, in all material respects; and

 

5.            All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. 

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP, Fifth Third Bank, HomeBanc Mortgage Corporation, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

 

March 30, 2007

 

By: /s/ Tommy Harris

Name:  Tommy Harris

Title: Senior Vice President of CitiMortgage Inc.
CERTIFICATIONI, Leo S. Ullman, Chief Executive Officer of Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc. (the “Company”), pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify as follows:1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2007 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and2. The information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Certification this 10th day of May, 2007.   /s/ LEO S. ULLMAN Leo S. Ullman, Chief Executive Officer  
 

 
CERTIFICATIONI, Thomas J. O’Keeffe, Chief Financial Officer of Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc. (the “Company”),pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify as follows:1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2007 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and2. The information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Certification this 10th day of May, 2007.   /s/ THOMAS J. O’KEEFFE Thomas J. O’Keeffe, Chief Financial Officer
#### § 70.39 Form of application.

Each application for grading or sampling a specified lot of any product shall include such information as may be required by the Administrator in regard to the product and the premises where such product is to be graded or sampled.

[71 FR 42013, July 24, 2006]
Archive

NCARC Final Report*Avoiding Aviation Gridlock and Reducing the Accident Rate**December 1997*You can choose to view the documentonline and print it out using your browsers print icon or you can choose todownload the file in Word97 format.
(Please Note that the document is over 200 pages long.)
A Limited Number of Copies of the Published Report are Available...
Contact the DOT Warehouse
Requests can be made by:FAX:301-386-5394orMAIL:   TASC Departmental Warehouse3341Q 75th AVE.Landover, MD 20785
Provide the title of the publication, *Avoiding Aviation Gridlock & Reducing the Accident Rate,*number of copies requested, and name and address of recipient.
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit #31.1

                    CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Perry T. Massie, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Outdoor Channel
Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and we have:

         (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

         (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation;

         (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

         (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls over financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2003  /s/ Perry T. Massie
                         -----------------------------------------------
                         PERRY T. MASSIE, Chief Executive Officer

                                      -18-
52.242-17 Government Delay of Work.

As prescribed in 42.1305(c), insert the following clause:

Government Delay of Work (Apr 1984)

(a) If the performance of all or any part of the work of this contract is delayed or interrupted (1)by

an act of the Contracting Officer in the administration of this contract that is not expressly or

impliedly authorized by this contract, or (2)by a failure of the Contracting Officer to act within the

time specified in this contract, or within a reasonable time if not specified, an adjustment (excluding

profit) shall be made for any increase in the cost of performance of this contract caused by the delay

or interruption and the contract shall be modified in writing accordingly. Adjustment shall also be

made in the delivery or performance dates and any other contractual term or condition affected by

the delay or interruption. However, no adjustment shall be made under this clause for any delay or

interruption to the extent that performance would have been delayed or interrupted by any other

cause, including the fault or negligence of the Contractor, or for which an adjustment is provided or

excluded under any other term or condition of this contract.

(b) A claim under this clause shall not be allowed-

(1) For any costs incurred more than 20 days before the Contractor shall have notified the

Contracting Officer in writing of the act or failure to act involved; and

(2) Unless the claim, in an amount stated, is asserted in writing as soon as practicable after the

termination of the delay or interruption, but not later than the day of final payment under the

contract.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.242 [Reserved]
#### §§ 766.156-766.200 [Reserved]
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 39-4 Filed 05/31/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cr-00177-WHA-DRB Document 8-2 Filed 12/05/2006 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

REIYN J. KEOHANE,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:20cv559–WS/MAF

MARK S. INCH, et al.,

Defendants.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF

No. 16) docketed July 12, 2021. The magistrate judge recommends that this case

be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and to comply with a court

order.

Upon review of the record, this court has determined that the report and

recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF No. 16) is

Case 4:20-cv-00559-WS-MAF Document 17 Filed 08/12/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order of the court.

2. Plaintiff’s complaint and this action are hereby DISMISSED without

prejudice.

3. The clerk is directed to enter judgment, stating: "All claims are dismissed

without prejudice."

DONE AND ORDERED this 12th day of August , 2021.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:20-cv-00559-WS-MAF Document 17 Filed 08/12/21 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 33.2
                                  ------------


          ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA


The Bank of New York and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N. A.
(collectively, the "Company") provides this platform-level assessment of
compliance with the servicing criteria specified in Item 1122(d) of Regulation
AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Management has determined that the following servicing criteria are applicable
in regards to the following servicing platform for the following period:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially
required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential
mortgage-backed securities and other mortgage-related asset-backed securities
issued on or after January 1, 2006 (and like-kind transactions issued prior to
January 1, 2006) for which the Company provides trustee, securities
administration, paying agent or custodial services. The platform includes like
kind transactions for which the Company provided trustee, securities
administrator, paying agent or custodial services as a result of the Company's
acquisition as of October 1, 2006 of portions of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s
corporate trust business, including structured finance agency and trust
transactions.

Applicable Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d), to the extent required by the related transaction agreements as to
any transaction, except for the following criteria: 1122 (d) (1)(ii), (iii),
(iv), (4) (iv), (v), (vi), (vii), (viii), (ix), (x), (xi), (xii) and (xiii).

Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2006.

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the
following assessment of compliance in respect of the Applicable Servicing
Criteria:

o  The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria.

o  The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

o  As of December 31, 2006 and for the Period, the Company was in material
compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.



                                      1
<PAGE>


Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has
issued an attestation report with respect to the Company's foregoing
assessment of compliance.



      The Bank of New York                    The Bank of New York
      The Bank of New York Trust              The Bank of New York Trust
         Company, N.A.                           Company, N.A.


      /s/ Robert L. Griffin                   /s/ Patrick J. Tadie
      ---------------------------             ---------------------------
      Robert L. Griffin                       Patrick J. Tadie
      Authorized Signer                       Authorized Signer


March 1, 2007


                                      2
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 5:03-cr-05-MCR-GRJ

HERBERT D. BROWN,

____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before Defendant’s motion to amend his motion to vacate (Docs.

120 & 110) and second amended motion to vacate (Doc. 121). Defendant’s motion to

amend his initial motion to vacate is due to be denied as moot because he has since

filed a second amended motion to vacate (Doc. 121) and memorandum in support

(122). These supersede any previously filed motions to vacate or attachments. The

Court will order service of the motion to vacate by separate order. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

Defendant’s motion to amend, Doc. 120, is DENIED AS MOOT.

DONE AND ORDERED this 2 day of August 2012. nd

s/ Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:03-cr-00005-MCR-CJK Document 123 Filed 08/02/12 Page 1 of 1