alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2879 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2879

           To suspend temporarily the duty on Spirodiclofen.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 19, 2006

   Mr. Burr introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To suspend temporarily the duty on Spirodiclofen.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SPIRODICLOFEN.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.12.02      2,2-                Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         Dimethylbutanoic                                                   31/2009
                         acid, 3-(2,4-
                         dichlorophenyl)-2-
                         oxo-1-
                         oxaspiro(4.5)dec-
                         3-en-4-yl ester
                         (Spirodiclofen)
                         (CAS No. 148477-
                         71-8) (provided
                         for in subheading
                         2932.29.10)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
April 12 , 2016



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

SERGEANT MARY HAVER AND DEPUTY CONSTABLE KEVIN VAIL ES,

IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES , Appellant s
NO. 14

- 15

- 00185

- CV V.
BARBARA COATS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF TH E ESTATE OF JAMAIL A MRON AND AS HEIR TO THE ESTATE OF JAM AIL AMRON, DECEASED, AND ALI AMRON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS HEIR TO THE ESTATE O F JAMAIL AMRON, DECEASED , Ap pellee s

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the order denying appellants’ no

- evidence motion for summary judgment , signed February 27, 2015, was hea rd on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the order . We order the trial court’s order denying appellants’ no

- evidence motion for summary judgment AFFIRMED and remand the case to the trial court for further procee dings. We order appellant s , Se rgeant Mary Haver and Deputy Kevin Vailes, in their Individual Capacities, jointly and severally, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA OF

NORTHERN DIVISION

RALPH BROWN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-642-MEF

)

CHAMPION ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the defendant's Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative,

Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #5) filed on July 26, 2006, it is hereby ORDERED

that:

1. The plaintiff shall file a response which shall include a brief and any evidentiary

materials on or before August 10, 2006.

2. The defendant may file a reply brief on or before August 17, 2006.

DONE this 27th day of July, 2006.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 6 Filed 07/27/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### § 70.26 Cancellation of license.

Upon termination of the services of a licensed grader, the grader's license shall be immediately surrendered for cancellation.

[71 FR 42013, July 24, 2006]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2857 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2857

 To amend the International Air Transportation Competition Act of 1979 
     relating to air transportation to and from Love Field, Texas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 19, 2006

   Mr. Hagel introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the International Air Transportation Competition Act of 1979 
     relating to air transportation to and from Love Field, Texas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL DESIGNATED STATE; THROUGH TICKETING AND SERVICE.

    The first sentence of section 29(c) of the International Air 
Transportation Competition Act of 1979 (94 Stat. 35) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``Nebraska,'' before ``and Texas''; and
            (2) by striking ``, if (1)'' and all that follows through 
        the period at the end and inserting a period and the following: 
        ``Such air carrier may offer to provide or provide through or 
        connecting service or ticketing with another air carrier or 
        foreign carrier and may itself offer for sale transportation 
        between Love Field and any point outside of such States on a 
        through or connecting basis.''.
                                 <all>
```
52.222-14 Disputes Concerning Labor

Standards.

As prescribed in 22.407(a), insert the following clause:

Disputes Concerning Labor Standards (Feb 1988)

The United States Department of Labor has set forth in 29 CFR parts 5, 6, and 7 procedures for

resolving disputes concerning labor standards requirements. Such disputes shall be resolved in

accordance with those procedures and not the Disputes clause of this contract. Disputes within the

meaning of this clause include disputes between the Contractor (or any of its subcontractors) and

the contracting agency, the U.S. Department of Labor, or the employees or their representatives.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.222 [Reserved]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

March 30, 2007

NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY

 REGARDING CORPORATE/

CONFLICT STATEMENT

To: GSC Enterprises, Inc. 

From: Clerk’s Office

Case Style: Jahn v. Washington et al 

Case Number: 2:06-cv-00623-MEF

Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 7.1, and this

Court’s General Order Miscellaneous Case No. 00-3047 parties are required to file their

Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement at their initial appearance.

No corporate/conflict disclosure statement has been filed by you in this action.

This deficiency must be corrected within ten (10) days from this date. Please refer to

attachment.

Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 25 Filed 03/30/2007 Page 1 of 1
Part 5619 - SMALL BUSINESS AND SMALL

DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS CONCERNS

Subpart 5619.2 - POLICIES

5619.201 - General Policy.

Subpart 5619.7 - THE SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PROGRAM

5619.705 Responsibilities of the Contracting Officer Under the Subcontract Assistance Program.

5619.705-3 Preparing the Solicitation.

5619.705-4 Reviewing the Subcontract Plan.

Subpart 5619.2 - POLICIES

5619.201 - General Policy.

(Revised October 2010)

(d)(10)(1) The Small Business Coordination Record (DD 2579) shall be completed by the contract

specialist and reviewed by the Small Business Specialist on all acquisitions (including Federal

Supply Schedule orders) over $10,000, except those under the simplified acquisition threshold that

are totally set aside for small business concerns.

(2)Reserved.

(3)Attach the Market Research Report (see DCG) to the Small Business Coordination Record (DD

2579) when submitting the DD 2579 for approval of acquisitions above the simplified acquisition

threshold. Market research policies are located in FAR , DFARS , and SOFARS Part 10 .

Subpart 5619.7 - THE SMALL BUSINESS

SUBCONTRACTING PROGRAM

(Added January 2009)

5619.705 Responsibilities of the Contracting Officer Under the Subcontract

Assistance Program.
5619.705-3 Preparing the Solicitation.

(Revised January 2018)

The contracting officer shall provide the small business specialist five (5) business days prior to

issuing the solicitation. The small business specialist will forward the solicitation to the PCR. After

five business days have elapsed without input from the small business specialist or PCR, the

contracting officer may proceed with release of the solicitation.

5619.705-4 Reviewing the Subcontract Plan.

(d) All subcontracting plans that contain a Small Disadvantage Business goal of less than 5% must

be approved one level above the contracting officer. If the primary contracting officer is also the

office/division chief, then forward the subcontracting plan to the command’s Director of Small

Business Programs for approval.

HQ, United States Special Operations Command

Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L-K)

SOFARS 5619

February 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3010 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3010

  To suspend temporarily the duty on Halophosphor calcium diphosphate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 24, 2006

Mr. Reid (for Mr. Rockefeller) introduced the following bill; which was 
          read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on Halophosphor calcium diphosphate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HALOPHOSPHOR CALCIUM DIPHOSPHATE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.32.33      Halophosphor        Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         calcium                                                            31/2009
                         diphosphate;
                         inorganic product
                         of a kind used as
                         luminophores (CAS
                         No. 7790-76-3)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         3206.50.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2015215DE.01005201.xml

| 14.8.2015 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 215/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2015

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 215/52

---

Berichtigung des Durchführungsbeschlusses 2014/732/EU der Kommission vom 20. Oktober 2014 zur Änderung der Entscheidung 2007/453/EG hinsichtlich des BSE-Status von Bulgarien, Estland, Kroatien, Lettland, Luxemburg, Malta, Portugal, der Slowakei und Ungarn

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 302 vom 22. Oktober 2014
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 302 vom 22. Oktober 2014

Auf Seite 61, Anhang, Buchstabe A, unter der Überschrift „Drittländer“, zur Änderung des Anhangs der Entscheidung 2007/453/EG:

anstatt:

„Nicaragua“

muss es heißen:

„Peru“.

---
§ 773.8 Limitations. ( a ) The maximum loan amount any individual or business entity may receive under the Special Apple Loan Program is limited to $500,000.
( b ) The maximum loan is further limited to $300 per acre of apple trees in production in 1999 or 2000, whichever is greater.
( c ) Loan funds may not be used to pay expenses incurred for lobbying or related activities.
( d ) Loans may not be made for any purpose which contributes to excessive erosion of highly erodible land or to the conversion of wetlands to produce an agricultural commodity.
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 39-3 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 1 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 39-3 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 2 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 39-3 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 3 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 39-3 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 4 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 39-3 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 5 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 39-3 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 6 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 39-3 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 7 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 39-3 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 8 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 39-3 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 9 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 39-3 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 10 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 39-3 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 11 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 39-3 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 12 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 39-3 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 13 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 39-3 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 14 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 39-3 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 15 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 39-3 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 16 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 39-3 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 17 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00623-MEF-SRW Document 39-3 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 18 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00649-WHA-WC Document 8 Filed 07/31/2006 Page 1 of 1
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Yellowcake
Mining Inc. for the year ended July 31, 2008, the undersigned, William J.
Tafuri, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his
knowledge:

| | 1. | the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                             
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                              
| | 2. | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Yellowcake Mining Inc.



November 13, 2008



/s/ William J.
TafuriWilliam J.
TafuriPresident and Chief Executive OfficerPrincipal Executive Officer,
Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Yellowcake Mining Inc. and will be retained by
Yellowcake Mining Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Air Force

# ACTION:

Cancellation of Pan-STARRS EIS.

# SUMMARY:

                        Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended (42 United States Code 4321,                         *et seq.*), the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing the procedural provisions of NEPA (40 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) Parts 1500-1508), and U.S. Air Force (USAF) policy and procedures (32 CFR part 989), the USAF issued a notice on 10 Jan 07 advising the public of its intent to prepare an EIS evaluating potential environmental impacts associated with construction and operation of the proposed Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System (Pan-STARRS) by the University of Hawaii (UH) Institute for Astronomy (IfA). Pan-STARRS was to be a USAF-funded, UH IfA research program to discover, characterize and track Near-Earth Objects (NEOs), primarily asteroids and comets, whose trajectories pass close enough to Earth that they may pose a danger of collision.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Please direct any written comments or requests for information to Ms. Connie Rankin, Office of Public Affairs, 377 ABW/PA, 3550 Aberdeen Ave., SE., Kirtland AFB, NM 87117-5776 (Phone: 505-846-4321; e-mail                         *Connie.Rankin@kirtland.af.mil*).                     

Bao-Anh Trinh, 

GS-14, DAF, Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2010-30760 Filed 12-7-10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001-10-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

HAROLD KELLY MURPHY, * 

 * 

 Plaintiff, * 

 * 

v. * Case No.: 3:06-cv-618-MEF 

 * 

SOUTHERN ENERGY HOMES, INC., et al., * 

 * 

 Defendants. * 

MOTION TO WITHDRAW

Comes now the undersigneds, Lee H. Copeland, Robert D. Segall and the law firm of 

Copeland, Franco, Screws & Gill, P.A., respectfully move the Court for leave to withdraw as 

counsel of record for Defendant Southern Energy Homes, Inc. in the above-entitled and 

numbered cause, it being shown that Mitchel H. Boles and W. Scott Simpson will continue to 

serve as counsel for Defendant Southern Energy Homes, Inc. 

Respectfully submitted, 

 /s Lee H. Copeland 

 Robert D. Segall (ASB-7354-E68R) 

 Lee H. Copeland (ASB-3461-O72L) 

 

 Copeland, Franco, Screws & Gill, P.A. 

444 South Perry Street 

P. O. Box 347 

Montgomery, AL 36101-0347

Phone: 334/834-1180 

Facsimile: 334/834-3172 

Email: segall@copelandfranco.com

Email: copeland@copelandfranco.com

Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 23 Filed 02/26/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that on 21st of February, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing with 

the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to 

the following: 

• Charles Lance Gould

lance.gould@beasleyallen.com; holly.stroh@beasleyallen.com 

• Carter Gibson Vance

gibson.vance@beasleyallen.com; heidi.bowers@beasleyallen.com

• Mitchel Hampton Boles

mboles@johnstonbarton.com; aap@johnstonbarton.com; sma@johnstonbarton.com 

• Wayne Scott Simpson

ws.simpson@mindspring.com; smalone@sehomes.com 

 /s Lee H. Copeland 

 Of Counsel 

Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 23 Filed 02/26/2007 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

KELVIN BOWMAN, 

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:03cv568/RV/EMT

JAMES R. CROSBY, et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation dated May 26, 2005. Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the report and

recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United

States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed objections.

Having considered the report and recommendation, and all objections thereto timely filed,

I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.

2. Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (Doc. 28) is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 6th day of July, 2005.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:03-cv-00568-RV-EMT Document 41 Filed 07/06/05 Page 1 of 1
#### § 58.305 Meaning of words.

For the purpose of the regulations in this subpart, words in the singular form shall be deemed to impart the plural and vice versa, as the case may demand. Unless the context otherwise requires, the following terms shall have the following meaning.

(a) *Butter.* The food product usually known as butter, and which is made exclusively from milk or cream, or both, with or without common salt, with or without additional coloring matter, and containing not less than 80 percent by weight of milkfat, all tolerances having been allowed for.

(b) *Butteroil.* The food product resulting from the removal of practically all of the moisture and solids-not-fat from butter. It contains not less than 99.6 percent fat and not more than 0.3 percent moisture and not more than 0.1 percent other butter constituents, of which the salt shall be not more than 0.05 percent. Antioxidants permitted to be used are as follows:

| Antioxidant | Maximum level |
| --- | --- |
| Propyl gallate | 0.02% of fat. |
| Butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) | 0.02% of fat. |
| Butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) | 0.02% of fat. |
| Tocopherols | Limit by GMP. |
| Ascorbyl palmitate | Limit by GMP. |
| Dilauryl thiodipropionate | 0.02% of fat. |
| Antioxidant synergists | |
| Citric acid | Limit by GMP. |
| Sodium citrate | Limit by GMP. |
| Isopropyl citrate | 0.02% of food. |
| Phosphoric acid | Limit by GMP. |
| Monoglyceride citrate | 200 ppm of fat. |

An inert gas may be used to flush air-tight containers before, during, and after filling. Carbon dioxide may not be used for this purpose.

(c) *Anhydrous milkfat.* The food product resulting from the removal of practically all of the moisture and solids-not-fat from pasteurized cream or butter. It contains not less than 99.8 percent fat and not more than 0.1 percent moisture and, when produced from butter, not more than 0.1 percent other butter constituents, of which the salt shall be not more than 0.05 percent. An inert gas may be used to flush air-tight containers before, during, and after filling. Carbon dioxide may not be used for this purpose.

(d) *Frozen cream.* Sweet cream which has been pasteurized and frozen. It contains approximately 40 percent milkfat.

(e) *Plastic cream.* Sweet cream which has been pasteurized and contains approximately 80 percent milkfat.

(f) *Whipped butter.* The food product is made by the uniform incorporation of air or inert gas into butter.

[40 FR 47911, Oct. 10, 1975. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977, and further redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981, as amended at 59 FR 1264, Jan. 10, 1994; 60 FR 4825, Jan. 24, 1995]