alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
47.303-6 F.o.b. destination.

(a) Explanation of delivery term."F.o.b. destination"- means-

(1) Free of expense to the Government delivered, on board the carrier’s conveyance, at a specified

delivery point where the consignee’s facility (plant, warehouse, store, lot, or other location to which

shipment can be made) is located; and

(2) Supplies shall be delivered to the destination consignee’s wharf (if destination is a port city and

supplies are for export), warehouse unloading platform, or receiving dock, at the expense of the

contractor. The Government shall not be liable for any delivery, storage, demurrage, accessorial, or

other charges involved before the actual delivery (or "constructive placement" as defined in carrier

tariffs) of the supplies to the destination, unless such charges are caused by an act or order of the

Government acting in its contractual capacity. If rail carrier is used, supplies shall be delivered to

the specified unloading platform of the consignee. If motor carrier (including "piggyback") is used,

supplies shall be delivered to truck tailgate at the unloading platform of the consignee, except when

the supplies delivered meet the requirements of Item568 of the National Motor Freight

Classification for "heavy or bulky freight." When supplies meeting the requirements of the

referenced Item568 are delivered, unloading (including movement to the tailgate) shall be

performed by the consignee, with assistance from the truck driver, if requested. If the contractor

uses rail carrier or freight forwarder for less than carload shipments, the contractor shall ensure

that the carrier will furnish tailgate delivery when required, if transfer to truck is required to

complete delivery to consignee.

(b) Contractor responsibilities. The contractor shall-

(1)

(i) Pack and mark the shipment to comply with contract specifications; or

(ii) In the absence of specifications, prepare the shipment in conformance with carrier requirements;

(2) Prepare and distribute commercial bills of lading;

(3) Deliver the shipment in good order and condition to the point of delivery specified in the

contract;

(4) Be responsible for any loss of and/or damage to the goods occurring before receipt of the

shipment by the consignee at the delivery point specified in the contract;

(5) Furnish a delivery schedule and designate the mode of delivering carrier; and

(6) Pay and bear all charges to the specified point of delivery.

(c) Contract clause. The contracting officer shall insert in solicitations and contracts the clause at

52.247-34, F.o.b. Destination, when the delivery term is f.o.b. destination.

Parent topic: 47.303 Standard delivery terms and contract clauses.
52.247-63 Preference for U.S.-Flag Air

Carriers.

As prescribed in 47.405 , insert the following clause:

Preference for U.S.-Flag Air Carriers (June 2003)

(a) Definitions. As used in this clause-

"International air transportation" means transportation by air between a place in the United States

and a place outside the United States or between two places both of which are outside the United

States.

United States means the 50 States, the District of Columbia, and outlying areas.

"U.S.-flag air carrier" means an air carrier holding a certificate under 49 U.S.C.Chapter411.

(b) Section 5 of the International Air Transportation Fair Competitive Practices Act of1974 (49

U.S.C.40118) (Fly America Act) requires that all Federal agencies and Government contractors and

subcontractors use U.S.-flag air carriers for U.S. Government-financed international air

transportation of personnel (and their personal effects) or property, to the extent that service by

those carriers is available. It requires the Comptroller General of the United States, in the absence

of satisfactory proof of the necessity for foreign-flag air transportation, to disallow expenditures

from funds, appropriated or otherwise established for the account of the United States, for

international air transportation secured aboard a foreign-flag air carrier if a U.S.-flag air carrier is

available to provide such services.

(c) If available, the Contractor, in performing work under this contract, shall use U.S.-flag carriers

for international air transportation of personnel (and their personal effects) or property.

(d) In the event that the Contractor selects a carrier other than a U.S.-flag air carrier for

international air transportation, the Contractor shall include a statement on vouchers involving such

transportation essentially as follows:

Statement of Unavailability of U.S.-Flag Air Carriers

International air transportation of persons (and their personal effects) or property by U.S.-flag air

carrier was not available or it was necessary to use foreign-flag air carrier service for the following

reasons (see section 47.403 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation): [State

reasons]:__________________________________________________

(End of statement)

(e) The Contractor shall include the substance of this clause, including this paragraph (e), in each

subcontract or purchase under this contract that may involve international air transportation.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.247 [Reserved]
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2896 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on crotonic acid. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 19, 2006 

Mr. BURR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on crotonic 

acid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CROTONIC ACID. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.04.10 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Crotonic acid) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and 

7 inserting ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•S 2896 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
# Subpart 5108.4 - Federal Supply Schedules

**Parent topic:**Part 5108 - Required Sources of Supplies and Services

## 5108.404 Use of federal supply schedules.

(h)(3)(ii)(C) The head of the contracting activity without the power to             further delegate is the approval authority for actions stated in FAR             8.404(h)(3)(ii)(C).

## 5108.405 Ordering procedures for federal supply schedules.

## 5108.405-3 Blanket purchase agreements (BPAs).

(a)(3)(ii). The Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology) makes the determination described in FAR 8.405-3(3)(ii).  See Appendix GG for further delegation. 

## 5108.405-6 Limited sources.

(b)(3)(ii)(C) The senior procurement executive makes the determination described in FAR 8.405-6(b)(3)(ii)(C).  See Appendix GG for further delegation.

(d)(3) The head of the contracting activity is the approval authority for actions stated in FAR 8.405-6(d)(3).  See Appendix GG for further delegation.
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-2730

___________ Vickie Fischer, * * Plaintiff - Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Western * District of Arkansas. Mary Jo Layton, Marion County * Clerk; Roger Logan, Marion County * [UNPUBLISHED] Chancery Judge, * * Defendants - Appellees. * *

___________ Submitted: January 6, 1998 Filed: January 14, 1998

___________ Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Vickie Fischer brought

this action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 against a Mar ion County, Arkansas, court clerk and Chancery Judge, seeking injunctive relie f and damages on the ground that she had been denied the right to file a petition toThe HONORABLE FRANKLIN H. WATERS, United States District Judge for 1 the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of th e HONORABLE BEVERLY R. STITES, United States Magistrate Judge for th e Western District of Arkansas. -2- enforce a child-support order. The district co urt dismissed Fischer’s claim against the 1 judge and her damages claim against the clerk, and later granted summary judgment on her remaining claim for injunctive relief against the clerk. Fischer appeals those two orders.
After careful review of the record and the parties’ briefs, we agree with th e district cou rt that the judge and the clerk are entitled to absolute judicial and quasi

judicial immunity from Fischer’s dama ges claims. We conclude that Fischer’s request for injunctive relief is moot because she has now been allowed to file a child-support petition in state court. The remaining issues F ischer raises in her brief are not properly before us, or lack merit. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We den y Fischer & s request for appointment of counsel as moot. We deny her Motion To Compel Obed ience to Order, mistakenly filed in the district court while this appeal wa s pending, because neither this court nor the district court has authority to supervise or control state court proceedings. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### DONOHOE, Respondent, v. HUNTER, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

June 27, 1906.)

Action by Mary Donohoe against David Hunter.

No opinion. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

§ 868.63 Certificating appeal inspection results. ( a ) *General.* An appeal inspection certificate shall be issued according to § 868.70 and instructions. Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, only the results of the appeal inspection or Board appeal inspection service shall be shown on the appeal inspection certificate.
( b ) *Required statements.* Each appeal inspection certificate shall show the statements required by this section, § 868.71, and instructions. ( 1 ) Each appeal inspection certificate shall clearly show: ( i ) The term “Appeal” or “Board Appeal” and
( ii ) a statement identifying the superseded certificate. The superseded certificate shall be considered null and void as of the date of the appeal inspection or Board appeal inspection certificate.
( 2 ) When the results for more than one kind of service are reported on a certificate, the appeal or Board appeal inspection certificate shall show a statement of which kind of service(s) results are based on the appeal or Board appeal inspection service and that all other results are those of the original inspection, retest inspection, or appeal inspection service.
( 3 ) If the superseded certificate is in the custody of the Service, the superseded certificate shall be marked “Void.” If the superseded original inspection, retest inspection, or appeal inspection certificate is not in the custody of the Service at the time the appeal certificate is issued, a statement indicating that the superseded certificate has not been surrendered shall be shown on the appeal certificate.
( c ) *Finality of Board appeal inspection.* A Board appeal inspection shall be the final appeal inspection service except that for nongraded commodities an appeal shall be the final appeal inspection.
[53 FR 3722, Feb. 9, 1988. Redesignated and amended at 60 FR 16364, Mar. 30, 1995]
#### §§ 766.207-766.250 [Reserved]
Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO.: 3:04cr5/MCR

KIMBERLY RENEE CLARKE

 /

ORDER REDUCING SENTENCE

Before the Court is the Government’s Rule 35 motion (doc. 181) advising that

a reduction in Defendant’s sentence may be warranted by her cooperation and

substantial assistance since her sentencing. The Court finds that a reduction is

proper to reward her assistance to the Government in the investigation and

prosecution of others.

Defendant’s sentence of confinement is, therefore, reduced to 60 months. In

all other respects, the original sentence imposed in the Judgment and Commitment

Order filed May 28, 2004, shall remain unchanged.

ORDERED this 17th day of October, 2006.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:04-cr-00005-MCR Document 184 Filed 10/17/06 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Outdoor Channel Holdings,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, William A. Owen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best
of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
          in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

/s/ William A. Owen
-----------------------
WILLIAM A. OWEN
Chief Financial Officer
May 16, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Outdoor Channel Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Outdoor
Channel Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
null

2012-05-22

93.50315

eng - Argued: 2012-05-22. Docket number: 3-11-0566
#### John Hubbard, Respondent, v Jonathan Kamen, D.D.S., Appellant.

[814 NYS2d 158]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Rolando T. Acosta, J., and a jury), entered January 3, 2005, in favor of plaintiff and against defendant in an action for dental malpractice, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The verdict is supported by legally sufficient evidence of malpractice, namely, that when a patient complains of severe pain while being given a mandibular block anesthetic, a failure to withdraw the needle is a departure from accepted practice that can traumatize the mandibular nerve and cause permanent paresthesia. Defendant’s expert’s conflicting opinion, that when the patient feels an electric shock type sensation the needle should be redirected but not withdrawn, does not render the verdict against the weight of the evidence *(see Vona v Wank,*302 AD2d 516, 517 [2003]). Nor does the parties’ conflicting testimony as to the manner in which plaintiff reacted to the injection *(id,.).*

The trial court properly admitted defendant’s consent form. Although plaintiff had withdrawn his cause of action for lack of informed consent, the consent form did not list hitting the nerve or prolonged numbness as risks or complications of anesthetic injection, and the defense theory was that such were known, albeit rare, risks of the procedure. Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Marlow, Nardelli and Malone, JJ.
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 1 of 22
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 2 of 22
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 3 of 22
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 4 of 22
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 5 of 22
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 6 of 22
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 7 of 22
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 8 of 22
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 9 of 22
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 10 of 22
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 11 of 22
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 12 of 22
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 13 of 22
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 14 of 22
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 15 of 22
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 16 of 22
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 17 of 22
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 18 of 22
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 19 of 22
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 20 of 22
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 21 of 22
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 74-5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 22 of 22
#### § 51.2112 Mixed varieties.

Any lot of shelled almonds designated as “one type” or undesignated as to type, which consists of a mixture of two or more dissimilar varieties which meet the other requirements of any of the grades of U.S. No. 1, U.S. Select Sheller Run, U.S. Standard Sheller Run, U.S. No. 1 Whole and Broken may be designated as: “U.S. No. 1 Mixed;” “U.S. Select Sheller Run Mixed;” “U.S. Standard Sheller Run Mixed;” “U.S. No. 1 Whole and Broken Mixed;” respectively; but no lot of any of these grades may include more than 1 percent of bitter almonds mixed with sweet almonds.
52.217-9 Option to Extend the Term of the Contract.       As prescribed in 17.208(g), insert a clause substantially the same as the following:          Option to Extend the Term of the Contract (Mar 2000)                                       (a) The Government may extend the term of this contract by written notice to the Contractor within _____ [*insert the period of time within which the Contracting Officer may exercise the option*]; provided that the Government gives the Contractor a preliminary written notice of its intent to extend at least _____ days[*60days unless a different number of days is inserted*] before the contract expires. The preliminary notice does not commit the Government to an extension.                                          (b) 						            If the Government exercises this option, the extended contract shall be considered to include this option clause.                                          (c) The total duration of this contract, including the exercise of any options under this clause, shall not exceed ___________ (months) (years).                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.217 [Reserved]
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.21


FIRST AMENDMENT TO BUSINESS LOAN AGREEMENT DATED JUNE 14, 2013
	
										
	Principal
$20,000,000.00
	Loan Date
08-01-2014
	Maturity
06-14-2015
	Loan No
55120-0201
	Call / Coll
9A00 / AA
	Account
00000160370
	Officer
00456
	Initials



	References in the boxes above are for Lender's use only and do not limit the applicability of this document to any particular loan or item. 
Any item above containing “***” has been omitted due to text length limitations.




	
					
	Borrower:
	Heartland Financial USA, Inc.
	 
	Lender:
	Bankers Trust Company

	 
	1398 Central Avenue
	 
	 
	453 7th Street

	 
	Dubuque, IA 52001
	 
	 
	P.O. Box 897

	 
	 
	 
	 
	Des Moines, IA 50304-0897

	 
	 
	 
	 
	(515)245-2863



 


This first Amendment to Business Loan Agreement by this reference is made a part of the Business Loan Agreement dated June 14, 2013, and is executed in connection with a loan or other financial accommodations between Heartland Financial USA, Inc, ("Borrower") and Bankers Trust Company ("Lender") on the following terms and conditions.  
Borrower and Lender acknowledge the following change:
AFFIRMATIVE COVENANTS
Page 2 - Financial Statements.
MINIMUM ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES TO GROSS LOANS AND LEASES: Borrower shall maintain, on a consolidated basis, an Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses to Gross Loans and Leases ratio of at least 1.0%. For this purpose, Borrower may include the Discount on Loans Acquired within the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses. This covenant shall be measured quarterly.
READ BEFORE SIGNING. THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT SHOULD BE READ CAREFULLY BECAUSE ONLY THOSE TERMS IN WRITING ARE ENFORCEABLE. NO OTHER TERMS OR ORAL PROMISES NOT CONTAINED IN THIS WRITTEN AGREEMENT MAY BE LEGALLY ENFORCED. THE PARTIES MAY CHANGE THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT ONLY BY ANOTHER WRITTEN AGREEMENT.
BORROWER ACKNOWLEDGES HAVING READ ALL THE PROVISIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT AND AGREES TO ITS TERMS.
BORROWER ACKNOWLEDGES RECEIPT OF AN EXECUTED COPY OF THIS AGREEMENT.
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO BUSINESS LOAN AGREEMENT DATED JUNE 14, 2013 IS EXECUTED ON AUGUST 1, 2014.  
BORROWER:


HEARTLAND FINANCIAL USA, INC.
	
	
	By: /s/ Bryan R. McKeag

	Bryan R. McKeag, Chief Financial Officer of Heartland Financial USA, Inc.




LENDER: 


BANKERS TRUST COMPANY
	
	
	By: /s/ John Ruan, IV

	John Ruan, IV, Vice President
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

 PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN IN RE SKANSKA USA

CIVIL SOUTHEAST INC. AND

SKANSKA USA, INC., AS

OWNERS OF THE BARGE KS ADMIRALTY RULE 9(H)

5531 PRAYING FOR

EXONERATION FROM OR Case No.: 3:20cv5980/LAC/HTC

LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 

___________________________________/

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Order of the Magistrate Judge entered on June 19,

2021 (Doc. 1192), and after reviewing the Objections to the Order (Doc. 1201) and

the Responses thereto (Docs. 1203, 1204), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(A) and

Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a), the Court determines that the Order is neither clearly erroneous

nor contrary to law. 

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

The Objections are DENIED, and the matter shall be referred back to the

Magistrate Judge for all further proceedings as relevant.

ORDERED on this 13th day of July, 2021.

 s/L.A. Collier 

Lacey A. Collier

Senior United States District Judge

Case 3:20-cv-05980-LC-HTC Document 1205 Filed 07/13/21 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<PAGE>

<ARTICLE>           5

<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial 
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for P-B Watson & Taylor, Ltd. 3
                    and is qualified in its entirety by reference
                    to such financial statements
</LEGEND>

<RESTATED>          
<CIK>               0000759726
<NAME>              P-B Watson & Taylor, Ltd. 3

<MULTIPLIER>        1

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Sep-30-1997

<PERIOD-START>                  Oct-01-1996

<PERIOD-END>                    Dec-31-1996

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-Mos

<CASH>                          1,300,415

<SECURITIES>                    0

<RECEIVABLES>                   16,510

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                0

<PP&E>                          275,000

<DEPRECIATION>                  0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,591,925

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           449,898

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      1,142,027

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,591,925

<SALES>                         191,115

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                191,115

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                379,422

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    (188,307)

<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (3.50)

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0


</TABLE>