alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.6



THIRD AMENDMENT
TO THE
PNM RESOURCES, INC.
NON-UNION SEVERANCE PAY PLAN


Effective January 1, 2002, Public Service Company of New Mexico ("PNM") adopted
the Public Service Company of New Mexico Benefits My Way Plan (the "BMW Plan").
Effective November 27, 2002, sponsorship of the BMW Plan was transferred from PNM to PNM
Resources, Inc. (the "Company") and the BMW Plan was renamed the "PNM Resources, Inc.
Benefits My Way Plan." The BMW Plan consisted of a number of component programs
including Program 12, Non-Union Severance Pay Program (the "Non-Union Severance
Program"). Effective as of January 1, 2004, the Company amended and restated the BMW Plan
to divide it into a number of separate plans that replaced several of the component programs in
effect on December 31, 2003. As part of the amendment and restatement, the PNM Resources,
Inc. Non-Union Severance Pay Plan (the "Plan") was created as a successor plan to the Non-
Union Severance Program, effective as of January 1, 2004. The Plan was most recently amended
and restated effective August 1, 2007. By this instrument, the Company now desires to amend
the Plan as set forth below.
		
	1.
	   Except as otherwise provided, this Third Amendment shall be effective as of


January 3, 2015.


		
	2.
	   Section 2.1(o) (Definitions "Management Group") is hereby amended and


restated to read as follows:


(o) "Management Group" means any Participant who 
               is in salary grade G04 through G01 at the time of Impaction.


		
	3.
	    This Third Amendment amends only the provisions of the Plan as noted above,


and those provisions not expressly amended shall be considered in full force and effect.








1


Exhibit 10.6









Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Third Amendment shall supersede the provisions of the Plan
to the extent those provisions are inconsistent with the provisions and intent of this Third
Amendment.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Third Amendment to be
executed as of this 11th day of November, 2015.
PNM RESOURCES, INC.
By:   /s/ Patrick V. Apodaca                                
Its:    Sr VP, General Counsel and Corporate 
Secretary




2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000759641
<NAME> AEI REAL ESTATE FUND 85-A LTD PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         180,832
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               180,832
<PP&E>                                       5,126,348
<DEPRECIATION>                               (973,990)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,333,190
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          119,327
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,213,863
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,333,190
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               404,761
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  161,675
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                243,086
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            243,086
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   243,086
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    33.97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    33.97
        

</TABLE>
252.237-7000 Notice of Special Standards of Responsibility.       As prescribed in 237.270 (e)(1), use the following provision:          NOTICE OF SPECIAL STANDARDS OF RESPONSIBILITY (DEC 1991)          (a)  To be determined responsible, the Offeror must meet the general standards of responsibility set forth at FAR 9.104-1 and the following criteria, as described in Chapter 3, General Standards, of “Government Auditing Standards.”          (1)  Qualifications;          (2)  Independence; and          (3)  Quality Control.          (b)  “Government Auditing Standards” is issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and is available for sale from the:          Superintendent of Documents                         U.S. Government Printing Office                         Washington, DC  20401Stock number 020-000-00243-3.(c)  The apparently successful Offeror, before award, shall give the Contracting Officer evidence that it is licensed by the cognizant licensing authority in the state or other political jurisdiction where the Offeror operates its professional practice.          (End of provision)    **Parent topic:** 252.237 RESERVED
#### William L. Ellis, Respondent, *v.*The Phenix National Bank, Appellant.

(Argued April 30, 1884;

decided May 9, 1884.)

*Flamen B. CcmdUr*for appellant.

*Frederick H. Mam,*for respondent.

*Per Curiam,.*

Mem. for affirmance.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
#### § 760.26 Appeals.

The appeal regulations issued by the Administrator, FSA, part 780 of this chapter, shall be applicable to appeals by dairy farmers or manufacturers from determinations made pursuant to the regulations in this subpart.
Exhibit 13.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Rodman International Enterprise II, Ltd.(the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Arnold P. Kling, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated: June 16, 2011





/s/ Arnold P. KlingArnold P. KlingPresident(Principal Executive Officer)





A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 624.7 Cost-sharing. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the Federal contribution toward the implementation of emergency measures may not exceed 75 percent of the construction cost of such emergency measures, including work done to offset or mitigate adverse impacts as a result of the emergency measures.
( b ) If NRCS determines that an area qualifies as a limited resource area, the Federal contribution toward the implementation of emergency measures may not exceed 90 percent of the construction cost of such emergency measures.
47.303-15 F.o.b. designated air carrier’s

terminal, point of exportation.

(a) Explanation of delivery term."F.o.b. designated air carrier’s terminal, point of exportation" means

free of expense to the Government loaded aboard the aircraft, or delivered to the custody of the air

carrier (if only the air carrier performs the loading), at the air carrier’s terminal specified in the

contract.

(b) Contractor responsibilities. The contractor shall-

(1)

(i) Pack and mark the shipment to comply with contract specifications; or

(ii) In the absence of specifications, prepare the shipment for air transportation in conformance with

carrier requirements to protect the goods and to ensure assessment of the lowest applicable

transportation charge;

(2)

(i) Deliver the shipment in good order and condition into the conveyance of the carrier, or to the

custody of the carrier (if only the carrier performs the loading), at the point of delivery and on the

date or within the period specified in the contract; and

(ii) Pay and bear all applicable charges up to this point;

(3) Provide a clean bill of lading and/or air waybill;

(4) Be responsible for any loss of and/or damage to the goods occurring before delivery of the goods

to the point specified in the contract; and

(5) At the Government’s request and expense, assist in obtaining the documents required for the

purpose of exportation.

(c) Contract clause. The contracting officer shall insert in solicitations and contracts the clause at

52.247-43. F.o.b. Designated Air Carrier’s Terminal, Point of Exportation, when the delivery term is

f.o.b. designated air carrier’s terminal, point of exportation.

Parent topic: 47.303 Standard delivery terms and contract clauses.
#### Samuel L. Walker, Respondent, v Erie-Lackawanna Railroad, Appellant.

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, motion granted and action dismissed (see *Barasch v Micucci,*49 NY2d 594). (Appeal from order of Niagara Supreme Court—dismiss action.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Cardamone, Simons, Doerr and Witmer, JJ.
No. 47,253

#### Wendell Lloyd Taylor, *Appellant,*v. State of Kansas, *Appellee.*

(519 P. 2d 1398)

Opinion filed March 2, 1974.

*Tom Boone,*of Leavenworth, argued the cause and was on the brief for the appellant.

*Vern Miller,*attorney general, and *Patrick J. Reardon,*county attorney, were on the brief for appellee.

*Per Curiam:*

This is an appeal from a K. S. A. 60-1507 proceeding initiated by Wendell Lloyd Taylor, appellant, requesting the district court of Leavenworth County to vacate the judgment and sentence entered against him for escaping from the Kansas State Penitentiary. After an evidentiary hearing, the court denied Taylor’s motion. Taylor has duly perfected an appeal.

The pertinent facts occurring prior to appellant’s K. S. A. 60-1507 motion are as follows.

In September of 1969 appellant was incarcerated in the Kansas State Penitentiary. On September 27, 1969, the appellant escaped from the institution and fled the state. A complaint was filed on October 1, 1969, in the city court of Leavenworth County, Kansas, alleging appellant’s escape from Kansas State Penitentiary. Appellant testified that on October 1, 1969, he was incarcerated in the Ohio Penitentiary, where he remained for a little over a year.

On October 8, 1970, Kansas authorities transported the appellant back to K. S. P. That same day appellant appeared in city court, where he waived a preliminary examination, and a trial was set in the district court. Thereafter, on October 28, 1970, an information was filed in the district court alleging the escape.

On October 30, 1970, after being advised by appointed counsel, the appellant entered a plea of guilty to the charge of escape, and was sentenced.

The appellant argues on appeal the Kansas State Penitentiary authorities were required to inform him of his rights under the Uniform Mandatory Disposition of Detainers Act (K. S. A. 1973 Supp. 22-4301 *et seq.)*during the year from October 1, 1969 (the date the complaint was filed in city court) to October 1, 1970.

*286The appellant contends since this was not done his sentence should be vacated under K. S. A. 1973 Supp. 22-4301 (c).

The Uniform Mandatory Disposition of Detainers Act only applies to persons “imprisoned in a penal or correctional institution of *this state”*(K. S. A. 1973 Supp. 22-4301 [a]) (Emphasis added).

We said in *State v. Morton,*200 Kan. 259, 436 P. 2d 382, cert. den. 393 U. S. 890, 21 L. Ed. 2d 168, 89 S. Ct. 209, reh. den. 393 U. S. 947, 21 L. Ed. 2d 288, 89 S. Ct. 308:

> “. . . It [Uniform Mandatory Disposition of Detainers Act] has no application when the imprisonment is by some jurisdiction other than the State of Kansas, not only by specific provisions of the statute, but because this state would be unable to secure his attendance from the federal government or another state except as a matter of comity. . . .” (p. 261.)

Clearly, the Uniform Mandatory Disposition of Detainers Act did not apply to appellant during the period from October 1, 1969, to October 8, 1970, when he was absent from any Kansas penal or correctional institution.

The judgment of the lower court is affirmed.
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 2 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 1 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 2 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 2 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 2 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 3 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 2 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 4 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 2 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 5 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 2 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 6 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 2 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 7 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 2 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 8 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 2 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 9 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 2 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 10 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 2 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 11 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 2 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 12 of 12
# L_2014040EN.01001201.xml

| 11.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 40/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 40/12

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 126/2014

of 5 February 2014

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Paprika Žitava/Žitavská paprika (PDO)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Slovakia’s application to register the name ‘Paprika Žitava’/‘Žitavská paprika’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Slovakia’s application to register the name ‘Paprika Žitava’/‘Žitavská paprika’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Paprika Žitava’/‘Žitavská paprika’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Paprika Žitava’/‘Žitavská paprika’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 5 February 2014.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 247, 28.8.2013, p. 7.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.8.   Other products of Annex I to the Treaty (spices, etc.)

SLOVAKIA

Paprika Žitava/Žitavská paprika (PDO)

---
(May 9, 1969)

#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. James Jenkins, Appellant, v. Daniel McMann, as Warden of Clinton Prison, Respondent.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, without costs, unless appellant shall, on or before July 3, 1969, surrender himself to the New York State Board of Parole and submit himself to the jurisdiction of the court, in which event motion denied. (See *People*v. *Del Rio,*14 N Y 2d 165, 169, cert. den. 379 U. S. 939; *People ex rel. Erhardt*v. *Foster,*299 N. Y. 628; *People ex rel. Hamilton*v. *Police Comr. City of New York,*185 N. Y. 594.) Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Cooke, JJ., concur.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

WAYNE BLACK, #137192, )

)

 Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:03-CV-734-MEF

)

LAMAR GLOVER, et al., )

)

 Defendants )

ORDER ON MOTION

Upon consideration of the motion for leave to file witness list and document

identification out of time filed by the defendants on August 30, 2006 (Court Doc. No. 21),

and for good cause shown, it is 

ORDERED that this motion be and is hereby GRANTED. 

DONE, this 31st day of August, 2006.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-00734-MEF-SRW Document 23 Filed 08/31/2006 Page 1 of 1
Subpart 5624.2 - FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT     **Parent topic:** Part 5624 - PROTECTION OF PRIVACY AND FREEDOM OF INFORMATION5624.203 Policy.    *(Revised June 2021)*       Each contracting office shall utilize their component's Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) office process. Contracting offices may contact USSOCOM Command Information Services Division FOIA Manager (SOCS-SJS-VI) for additional assistance.              HQ, United States Special Operations Command       Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L)       SOFARS 5624       February 2007
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0517

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

SHANE CLARK JOHNSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including April 13, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 8 2023

03/08/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0517
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 76466]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30882]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreement Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreement under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit 
comments on the agreement to the Secretary, Federal Maritime 
Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within ten days of the date this 
notice appears in the Federal Register. A copy of the agreement is 
available through the Commission's Web site http://www.fmc.gov or by 
contacting the Office of Agreements at (202) 523-5793 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4d393f2c29282c232c21343e243e0d2b202e632a223b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="641016050001050a05081d170d17240209074a030b12">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Agreement No.: 011545-003.
    Title: Agreement Between CSAV and Mitsui.
    Parties: Compania Sud Americana de Vapores, S.A. and Mitsui O.S.K. 
Lines, Ltd.
    Filing Party: Walter H. Lion, Esq.; McLaughlin & Stern, LLP; 260 
Madison Avenue; New York, NY 10016.
    Synopsis: The amendment expands the geographic scope of the 
agreement to include ports in Turkey and North Europe, including the 
United Kingdom.

    Dated: December 3, 2010.

    By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.
Rachel E. Dickon,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-30882 Filed 12-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

AT HOME AUTO GLASS, LLC 

A/A/O ARGENIS DURAN, 

Appellant, 

v.

Case No. 5D21-2053

LT Case No. 2021-SC-000972

MENDOTA INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/

Opinion filed August 26, 2022

Nonfinal Appeal from the County Court

for Seminole County, 

James J. DeKleva, Judge.

Chad A. Barr, of Chad Barr Law, 

Altamonte Springs, for Appellant.

Matthew C. Scarborough and Amy 

Lee, of Scarborough Attorneys at 

Law, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM. 

At Home Auto Glass, LLC a/a/o Argenis Duran appeals the trial court’s 

nonfinal order granting Appellee, Mendota Insurance Company’s, motion to 
2

transfer venue pursuant to section 47.122, Florida Statutes (2020). Based 

on our recent decision in At Home Auto Glass, LLC v. Mendota Insurance, 

47 Fla. L. Weekly D1706 (Fla. 5th DCA Aug. 12, 2022), which involved the 

same parties and is indistinguishable in all material respects from the instant 

case, we reverse the order transferring venue and remand this case for 

further proceedings. 

REVERSED and REMANDED.

LAMBERT, C.J., EVANDER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
Case 3:20-cv-05602-MCR-HTC Document 1 Filed 07/01/20 Page 1 of 36
Case 3:20-cv-05602-MCR-HTC Document 1 Filed 07/01/20 Page 2 of 36
Case 3:20-cv-05602-MCR-HTC Document 1 Filed 07/01/20 Page 3 of 36
Case 3:20-cv-05602-MCR-HTC Document 1 Filed 07/01/20 Page 4 of 36
Case 3:20-cv-05602-MCR-HTC Document 1 Filed 07/01/20 Page 5 of 36
Case 3:20-cv-05602-MCR-HTC Document 1 Filed 07/01/20 Page 6 of 36
Case 3:20-cv-05602-MCR-HTC Document 1 Filed 07/01/20 Page 7 of 36
Case 3:20-cv-05602-MCR-HTC Document 1 Filed 07/01/20 Page 8 of 36
Case 3:20-cv-05602-MCR-HTC Document 1 Filed 07/01/20 Page 9 of 36
Case 3:20-cv-05602-MCR-HTC Document 1 Filed 07/01/20 Page 10 of 36
Case 3:20-cv-05602-MCR-HTC Document 1 Filed 07/01/20 Page 11 of 36
Case 3:20-cv-05602-MCR-HTC Document 1 Filed 07/01/20 Page 12 of 36
Case 3:20-cv-05602-MCR-HTC Document 1 Filed 07/01/20 Page 13 of 36
Case 3:20-cv-05602-MCR-HTC Document 1 Filed 07/01/20 Page 14 of 36
Case 3:20-cv-05602-MCR-HTC Document 1 Filed 07/01/20 Page 15 of 36
Case 3:20-cv-05602-MCR-HTC Document 1 Filed 07/01/20 Page 16 of 36
Case 3:20-cv-05602-MCR-HTC Document 1 Filed 07/01/20 Page 17 of 36
Case 3:20-cv-05602-MCR-HTC Document 1 Filed 07/01/20 Page 18 of 36
Case 3:20-cv-05602-MCR-HTC Document 1 Filed 07/01/20 Page 19 of 36
Case 3:20-cv-05602-MCR-HTC Document 1 Filed 07/01/20 Page 20 of 36
Case 3:20-cv-05602-MCR-HTC Document 1 Filed 07/01/20 Page 21 of 36
Case 3:20-cv-05602-MCR-HTC Document 1 Filed 07/01/20 Page 22 of 36
Case 3:20-cv-05602-MCR-HTC Document 1 Filed 07/01/20 Page 23 of 36
Case 3:20-cv-05602-MCR-HTC Document 1 Filed 07/01/20 Page 24 of 36
Case 3:20-cv-05602-MCR-HTC Document 1 Filed 07/01/20 Page 25 of 36
Case 3:20-cv-05602-MCR-HTC Document 1 Filed 07/01/20 Page 26 of 36
Case 3:20-cv-05602-MCR-HTC Document 1 Filed 07/01/20 Page 27 of 36
Case 3:20-cv-05602-MCR-HTC Document 1 Filed 07/01/20 Page 28 of 36
Case 3:20-cv-05602-MCR-HTC Document 1 Filed 07/01/20 Page 29 of 36
Case 3:20-cv-05602-MCR-HTC Document 1 Filed 07/01/20 Page 30 of 36
Case 3:20-cv-05602-MCR-HTC Document 1 Filed 07/01/20 Page 31 of 36
Case 3:20-cv-05602-MCR-HTC Document 1 Filed 07/01/20 Page 32 of 36
Case 3:20-cv-05602-MCR-HTC Document 1 Filed 07/01/20 Page 33 of 36
Case 3:20-cv-05602-MCR-HTC Document 1 Filed 07/01/20 Page 34 of 36
Case 3:20-cv-05602-MCR-HTC Document 1 Filed 07/01/20 Page 35 of 36
Case 3:20-cv-05602-MCR-HTC Document 1 Filed 07/01/20 Page 36 of 36
null

555.41406