alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 769.107 Rates and terms. ( a ) Loans made by the Agency to the intermediary lender will bear interest at a fixed rate as determined by the Administrator, but not less than 1 percent per year over the term of the loan. ( 1 ) Interest rates charged by intermediary lender to ultimate recipients on loans from the HFIL revolving fund will be negotiated between the intermediary lender and ultimate recipient, but the rate must be within limits established by the Intermediary Relending Agreement.
( 2 ) The rate should normally be the lowest rate sufficient to cover the loan's proportional share of the revolving fund's debt service costs and administrative costs.
( b ) No loan to an intermediary lender will be extended for a period exceeding 30 years. Interest will be due annually but principal payments may be deferred by the Agency. ( 1 ) Loans made by an intermediary lender to an ultimate recipient from the HFIL revolving fund will be scheduled for repayment over a term negotiated by the intermediary lender and ultimate recipient but will not exceed 30 years or the date of the end of the term of the HFIL loan, whichever is sooner.
( 2 ) The term of an HFIL loan must be reasonable and prudent considering the purpose of the loan, expected repayment ability of the ultimate recipient, and the useful life of collateral, and must be within any limits established by the intermediary lender's Intermediary Relending Agreement.
#### § 767.2 Abbreviations and definitions.

Abbreviations and definitions for terms used in this part are provided in § 761.2 of this chapter.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

MICHAEL ANDERSON, )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-CV-620-WKW

)

PAUL WHALEY, et al., )

Defendants. )

ORDER

There being no objections filed to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and

after an independent review, it is ORDERED that:

(1) The Recommendation is ADOPTED;

(2) Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED;

(3) This case is DISMISSED with prejudice;

(4) The costs of this proceeding shall be TAXED against the Plaintiff.

An appropriate judgment will be entered.

DONE this 3rd day of September, 2009.

/s/ W. Keith Watkins

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00620-WKW-CSC Document 20 Filed 09/03/09 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3065 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3065

       To reduce temporarily the duty on (IPN) Isophthalonitrile.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

  Mr. Cornyn introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To reduce temporarily the duty on (IPN) Isophthalonitrile.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. (IPN) ISOPHTHALONITRILE.

    (a) Calendar Year 2007.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 is amended by 
inserting in numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.12.06      1,3-                1.95%        No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         Benzenedicarbonit                                                  31/2007
                         rile (CAS No. 626-
                         17-5) (provided
                         for in subheading
                         2926.90.48)......

    (b) Calendar Year 2008.--
            (1) In general.--Heading 9902.12.06, as added by subsection 
        (a), is amended--
                    (A) by striking ``1.95%'' and inserting ``2.1%''; 
                and
                    (B) by striking ``On or before 12/31/2007'' and 
                inserting ``On or before 12/31/2008''.
            (2) Effective date.--The amendments made by paragraph (1) 
        shall take effect on January 1, 2008.
    (c) Calendar Year 2009.--
            (1) In general.--Heading 9902.12.06, as added by subsection 
        (a) and amended by subsection (b) and (c), is further amended--
                    (A) by striking ``2.1%'' and inserting ``2.27%''; 
                and
                    (B) by striking ``On or before 12/31/2008'' and 
                inserting ``On or before 12/31/2009''.
            (2) Effective date.--The amendments made by paragraph (1) 
        shall take effect on January 1, 2009.
                                 <all>
```
EX-34 (n)
(logo) ERNST & YOUNG


Ernst & Young LLP
Suite 2800
600 Peachtree Street
Atlanta, Georgia 30308-2215

Phone: (404) 874-8300
www.ey.com

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on
Assessment of Compliance with Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB
Servicing Criteria, that ZC Sterling Insurance Agency, Inc. (the Company)
complied with certain servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the ZC Sterling
Integrated Product Solution (ZIPS) hazard insurance outsourcing Platform
(Platform) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006. The Company has
determined that only certain servicing criteria 1122 (d) 1(iv), 1122 (d) 2(vi),
1122 (d) 4(xi), 1122 (d) 4(xii), and 1122 (d) 4(xiii) are applicable to the
activities performed by them with respect to the Platform covered by this
report. The Company has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set
forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB
are not applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the
Platform covered by this report. See Appendix A of management's assertion for
the Platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the Company's
compliance with those servicing criteria, Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with the
servicing criteria based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining,
on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than
all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether
the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing
criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the servicing activities
performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our
procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred
either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances
or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by
this report for the Platform. We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006
for the ZIPS Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

February 20, 2007


A Member Practice of Ernst & Young Global
**Docket Number: FAA -**  **201 5**  **- 0**  **087**

**Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?**
STEAM ELECTRIC

CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: ________________________________________

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.

SE04360A146
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

ANDREW WAYNE MATTHEWS, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO.

) 2:06cv621-MHT

RICHARD ALLEN, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that plaintiff Andrew Wayne Matthews’s

motion for a temporary restraining (Doc. No. 1) is

denied. 

It is further ORDERED that this case is referred back

to the magistrate judge for further appropriate

proceedings.

DONE, this the 18th day of July, 2006.

____/_s_/_ _M_y_r_o_n_ _H_._ _T_h_o_m_p_s_o_n_____

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:06-cv-00621-MHT-CSC Document 3 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 1 of 1
§ 760.1712 Estates and trusts; minors. ( a ) A receiver of an insolvent debtor's estate and the trustee of a trust estate will, for the purpose of this subpart, be considered to represent an insolvent affected farmer and the beneficiaries of a trust, respectively, and the production of the receiver or trustee will be considered to be the production of the represented person. Program documents executed by any such person will be accepted only if they are legally valid and such person has the authority to sign the applicable documents.
( b ) An affected dairy farmer who is a minor will be eligible for milk loss payments only if at least one of the following requirements is true: ( 1 ) The right of majority has been conferred on him by court proceedings or by law;
( 2 ) A guardian has been appointed to manage the property and the applicable program documents are signed by the guardian; or
( 3 ) A bond is furnished under which the surety guarantees any loss incurred for which the minor would be liable had the person been an adult.
[88 FR 62292, Sept. 11, 2023]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000759641
<NAME> AEI REAL ESTATE FUND 85-A LTD PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         145,707
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               145,707
<PP&E>                                       5,126,348
<DEPRECIATION>                               (870,232)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,401,823
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          120,710
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,281,113
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,401,823
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               390,379
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  162,625
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                227,754
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            227,754
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   227,754
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    31.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    31.73
        

</TABLE>
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2015114EN.01002401.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 5.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 114/24 |

---

Corrigendum to Directive 2014/23/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on the award of concession contracts

(
[Official Journal of the European Union L 94 of 28 March 2014](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2014_094_R_TOC)
)

On page 33, point (a) of the third subparagraph of Article 31(5):

for:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(a) | where the applicant concerned shall or may be excluded pursuant to Article 38(5) to (9) or does not meet the selection criteria set out by the contracting authority or the contracting entity pursuant to Article 38(1);’ |

,

read:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(a) | where the applicant concerned shall or may be excluded pursuant to Article 38(4) to (9) or does not meet the selection criteria set out by the contracting authority or the contracting entity pursuant to Article 38(1);’ |

;

on page 33, the first subparagraph of Article 33(1):

for:

‘1.   Concession notices, concession award notices and the notice referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 43(1) shall include the information set out in Annexes V, VII and VIII and in the format of standard forms, including standard forms for corrigenda.’

,

read:

‘1.   Concession notices, concession award notices and the notice referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 43(1) shall include the information set out in Annexes V, VI, VII, VIII and XI and in the format of standard forms, including standard forms for corrigenda.’

;

on page 53, Annex II, the introductory wording of the second subparagraph of paragraph 1:

for:

‘The supply by a contracting entity referred to in points (b) and (c) of Article 7(1) of gas or heat to fixed networks which provide a service to the public shall not be considered to be a relevant activity within the meaning of paragraph 1 where all of the following conditions are met:’

,

read:

‘The supply by a contracting entity referred to in points (b) and (c) of Article 7(1) of gas or heat to fixed networks which provide a service to the public shall not be considered to be a relevant activity within the meaning of the first subparagraph of this paragraph where all of the following conditions are met:’

;

on page 53, Annex II, the introductory wording of the third subparagraph of paragraph 2:

for:

‘The supply by a contracting entity referred to in points (b) and (c) of Article 7(1) of electricity to networks which provide a service to the public shall not be considered to be a relevant activity within the meaning of paragraph 1 where all of the following conditions are met:’

,

read:

‘The supply by a contracting entity referred to in points (b) and (c) of Article 7(1) of electricity to networks which provide a service to the public shall not be considered to be a relevant activity within the meaning of the first subparagraph of this paragraph where all of the following conditions are met:’

.

---
§ 701.15 Starting practices before cost-share request is submitted; non-entitlement to payment; payment subject to the availability of funds. ( a ) Subject to paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, costs will not be shared for practices or components of practices that are started before a request for cost share under this part is submitted with the applicable county FSA office.
( b ) Costs may be shared for drought and non-drought practices or components of practices that are started before a request is submitted with the county FSA office, only if: ( 1 ) Considered and approved on a case-by-case basis in accordance with instructions of the Deputy Administrator;
( 2 ) The disaster that is the basis of a claim for cost-share assistance created a situation that required the producer to take immediate action to prevent further losses;
( 3 ) The Deputy Administrator determines that the request for assistance was filed within a reasonable amount of time after the start of the enrollment period; and
( 4 ) The practice was started no more than 60 days before the ECP or EFRP designation was approved for the applicable county office.
( c ) Any action taken prior to approval of a claim is taken at the producer's own risk.
( d ) An application for relief may be denied for any reason.
( e ) All payments under this part are subject to the availability of funds.
[69 FR 10302, Mar. 4, 2004, as amended at 75 FR 70088, Nov. 17, 2010]
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Yellowcake Mining Inc.
for the year ended July 31, 2008, the undersigned, Lisa Lopomo, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to her knowledge:

     1.   the Form 10-K/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Yellowcake Mining Inc.


/s/ Lisa Lopomo
--------------------------------------------------------------
Lisa Lopomo
President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer,
Secretary, Treasurer and Director (Principal Executive Officer,
Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

Date: November 12, 2010


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Yellowcake Mining Inc. and will be retained by Yellowcake Mining
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 42 Filed 01/03/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 42 Filed 01/03/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 42 Filed 01/03/2007 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Centenary International Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carlos Fabian De Sousa, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Carlos Fabian De SousaCarlos Fabian De SousaChief Financial OfficerMay 13, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and are not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
52.232-11 Extras.       As prescribed in 32.111(c)(2), insert the following clause, appropriately modified with respect to payment due dates in accordance with agency regulations, in solicitations and contracts when a fixed-price supply contract, fixed-price service contract, or transportation contract is contemplated:          Extras (Apr 1984)          Except as otherwise provided in this contract, no payment for extras shall be made unless such extras and the price therefor have been authorized in writing by the Contracting Officer.          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.232 [Reserved]
### MANDATE



## Court of Appeals

**First District of Texas**

NO. 01

- 13

- 01056

- CR

JIMMIE JOHNSON , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

Appeal from the 338th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 1346765 ).

TO THE 338TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before this Court , on the 30th day of October 2014 , the ca se upon appeal to revise or

to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by

the trial court on November 25, 2013. After submitting the

case on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised

by the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment

contains no r eversible error. Accordingly, the Court affirms

the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below

for observance.

Judgment rendered October 30 , 2014.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings

and Keye s. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Radack.WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order o f our said Court in

this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

February 27, 2015

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

CLERK OF THE COURT
§ 760.1514 Eligible acres. ( a ) Eligible acreage will be calculated using the lesser of the reported or determined acres shown to have been planted or prevented from being planted to a crop.
( b ) Initial crop acreage will be the payment acreage for under this subpart, unless the provisions for subsequent crops in this section are met. Subsequently planted or prevented planted acre acreage is considered acreage for under this subpart only if the provisions of this section are met. All plantings of an annual or biennial crop are considered the same as a planting of an initial crop in tropical regions as defined in part 1437, subpart F, of this title.
( c ) In cases where there is double cropped acreage, each crop may be included in the acreage only if the specific crops are approved by the FSA State committee as eligible double cropping practices in accordance with procedures approved by the Deputy Administrator.
( d ) Except for insured crops, participants with double cropped acreage not meeting the criteria in paragraph (c) of this section may have such acreage included in the acreage on more than one crop only if the participant submits verifiable records establishing a history of carrying out a successful double cropping practice on the specific crops for which payment is requested.
( e ) Participants having multiple plantings may receive payments for each planting included only if the planting meets the requirements of part 1437 of this title and all other provisions of this subpart are satisfied.
( f ) Losses due to prevented planting are eligible under this subpart only if the loss was due to a qualifying disaster event. Provisions of parts 718 and 1437 of this title specifying what is considered prevented planting and how it must be documented and reported apply. Crops located in tropical regions are not eligible for prevented planting.
( g ) Subject to the provisions of this subpart, the FSA county committee will: ( 1 ) Use the most accurate data available when determining planted and prevented planted acres; and
( 2 ) Disregard acreage of a crop produced on land that is not eligible for crop insurance or NAP.
( h ) If a farm has a crop that has both FSA and RMA acreage for insured crops, eligible acres will be based on the lesser of RMA or FSA acres.
( i ) For 2017 WHIP, prevented planting acres will be considered eligible acres if they meet all requirements of this subpart.
( j ) For WHIP+: ( 1 ) 2018 and 2020 crop year prevented planting acres and 2019 crop year uninsured and NAP-covered prevented planting acres will be eligible acres if they meet all requirements of this subpart; and
( 2 ) 2019 crop year insured prevented planting acres will not be eligible acres.
[83 FR 33801, July 18, 2018, as amended 84 FR 48531, Sept. 13, 2019]