alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER,****AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The certification set forth below is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238 is being “furnished” to the SEC rather than “filed” either as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure statement, and is not to be incorporated by reference into the Report or any other filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. The foregoing certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of Section 18 or Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

 

I, Timothy A. Peach, Chief Financial Officer of OnCure Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

1.               The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

2.               The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  March 15, 2011                                    |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                               |   |
| /s/   Timothy   A. Peach                                           |   |
| Timothy A. Peach                                                   |   |
| Chief Financial   Officer                                          |   |
| (Principal   Financial Officer and   Principal Accounting Officer) |   |

 

----
#### § 51.62 OMB control numbers assigned pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act.

The information collection requirements contained in this part have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the provisions of 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35 and have been assigned OMB Control No. 0581-0125.

(44 U.S.C. Chap. 35)

[49 FR 23826, June 8, 1984]
#### § 900.5 Docket number.

Each proceeding, immediately following its institution, shall be assigned a docket number by the hearing clerk and thereafter the proceeding may be referred to by such number.
§ 25.405 Revocation of designation. ( a ) *Basis for revocation.* The Secretary may revoke the designation of a rural area as an Empowerment Zone or Enterprise Community, or withdraw status as a Champion Community, if the Secretary determines, on the basis of the periodic monitoring and assessments described in § 25.402, that the applicant, lead managing entity, or the States or local governments in which the rural area is located have: ( 1 ) Modified the boundaries of the area without written approval from USDA;
( 2 ) Failed to make progress in implementing the strategic plan; or
( 3 ) Not complied substantially with the strategic plan (which may include failing to apply funds as contained in the strategic plan without advance written approval from USDA).
( b ) *Letter of Warning.* Before revoking the designation of a rural area as an Empowerment Zone or Enterprise Community, the Secretary will issue a letter of warning to the applicant, the lead managing entity (if different from the applicant) and the nominating States and local governments, with a copy to all affected Federal agencies of which USDA is aware: ( 1 ) Advising that the Secretary has determined that the applicant and/or lead managing entity and/or the nominating local governments and State: ( i ) Have modified the boundaries of the area without written approval from USDA; or
( ii ) Are not complying substantially with, or have failed to make satisfactory progress in implementing the strategic plan; and
( 2 ) Requesting a reply from all involved parties within 90 days of the receipt of this letter of warning.
( c ) *Notice of revocation.* To revoke the designation, the Secretary must issue a final notice of revocation of the designation of the rural area as an Empowerment Zone or Enterprise Community, after: ( 1 ) Allowing 90 days from the date of receipt of the letter of warning for response; and
( 2 ) Making a determination pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section.
( d ) *Notice to affected Federal agencies.* USDA will notify all affected Federal agencies of which it is aware of its determination to revoke any designation pursuant to this section or to modify a designation pursuant to § 25.404(b).
( e ) *Effective date.* The final notice of revocation of designation will be published in the Federal Register, and the revocation will be effective on the date of publication.
§ 5001.406 Guaranteed loan amounts. Applicable guaranteed loan amounts depend on the type of project and the source of its funding. ( a ) *CF projects.* The maximum amount of a CF guaranteed loan that may be made to a borrower, including the guaranteed and unguaranteed portions of any CF guaranteed loans, the outstanding principal and interest balance of any existing CF guaranteed loans, and any new CF guaranteed loan that is the subject of an application must not exceed $100 million.
( b ) *WWD projects.* The maximum amount of a WWD guaranteed loan that may be made to a borrower, including the guaranteed and unguaranteed portions of any WWD guaranteed loans, the outstanding principal and interest balance of any existing WWD guaranteed loans, and any new WWD guaranteed loan that is the subject of an application must not exceed $50 million.
( c ) *B&I project* s. The maximum total amount of B&I guaranteed loans (including the guaranteed and unguaranteed portions of any B&I guaranteed loans, the outstanding principal and interest balance of any existing B&I guaranteed loans, and any new B&I guaranteed loan that is the subject of an application) that may be made to a borrower is limited to a maximum amount of $25 million. The Secretary, whose authority may not be redelegated, may approve, at the Secretary's discretion, guaranteed loans in excess of $25 million and up to $40 million for rural cooperatives that process value-added agricultural commodities in accordance with § 5001.105(b)(18)(i).
( d ) *REAP projects.* The amount of a guaranteed loan that will be made available to an eligible project and borrower under this part will be at least $5,000 not to exceed 75 percent of eligible project costs. ( 1 ) The maximum total amount of REAP guaranteed loans made to a borrower, including the guaranteed and unguaranteed portions of all REAP guaranteed loans, the outstanding principal and interest balance of any existing REAP guaranteed loans and the new REAP guaranteed loan that is the subject of an application, must not exceed $25 million.
( 2 ) The total amount of funds available to agricultural producers for energy efficient equipment and systems will not exceed 15 percent of annual funds available to the program.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

WAYNE BLACK, #137192, )

)

 Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:03-CV-734-MEF

)

LAMAR GLOVER, et al., )

)

 Defendants )

ORDER ON MOTION

Upon consideration of the application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed

by the plaintiff on September 27, 2006 (Court Doc. No. 40), and as this court previously

granted the plaintiff such status on July 22, 2003 (Court Doc. No. 3), it is

ORDERED that this motion be and is hereby DENIED. 

DONE, this 29th day of September, 2006.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-00734-MEF-SRW Document 44 Filed 09/29/2006 Page 1 of 1
§ 6.34 Adjustment of appendices. ( a ) Whenever a historical license (Appendix 1) is not issued to an applicant pursuant to the provisions of § 6.23, is permanently surrendered or is revoked by the Licensing Authority, the amount of such license will be transferred to Appendix 2.
( b ) The cumulative annual transfers to Appendix 2 made in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section will be published by Notice in the Federal Register each year. If a transfer results in the addition of a new article, or an article from a country not previously listed in Appendix 2, the Licensing Authority shall afford all eligible applicants for that quota year the opportunity to apply for a license for such article.
[80 FR 44254, July 27, 2015]
#### § 915.40 Expenses.

The committee is authorized to incur such expenses as the Secretary finds are reasonable and likely to be incurred to enable the committee to exercise its powers and perform its duties in accordance with the provisions of this part during each fiscal year. The funds to cover such expenses shall be acquired by the levying of assessments as provided for in § 915.41.

[19 FR 3439, June 11, 1954. Redesignated at 26 FR 12751, Dec. 30, 1961, as amended at 35 FR 16627, Oct. 27, 1970]
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-41238

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FELIX VARGAS-HERRERA

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:01-CR-148-ALL

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Felix Vargas-Herrera

(Vargas) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Vargas has not filed a response.

Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no

nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 18, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal Nos. 10-73]

# AGENCY:

Defense Security Cooperation Agency, Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601-3740.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittals 10-73 with attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

Dated: December 1, 2010.

Morgan F. Park,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 76409)          ( print page 76410)          ( print page 76411)          ( print page 76412)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P

[FR Doc. 2010-30730 Filed 12-7-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
Part 5605 - PUBLICIZING CONTRACT

ACTIONS

Subpart 5605.1 - DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION

5605.102 Availability of Solicitations.

Subpart 5605.2 - SYNOPSES OF PROPOSED CONTRACT ACTIONS

5605.207 Preparation and Transmittal of Synopses.

Subpart 5605.3 - SYNOPSES OF CONTRACT AWARDS

5605.302 Preparation and Transmittal of Synopses of Awards.

5605.303 Announcement of Contract Awards.

Subpart 5605.4 - RELEASE OF INFORMATION

5605.403 Requests from Members of Congress

Subpart 5605.1 - DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION

5605.102 Availability of Solicitations.

(Revised August 2016)

(a)(7)

(A) When posting is required, contracting offices shall post all solicitations over $25,000

electronically on Government Point of Entry (GPE) website.

(B) When electronic dissemination of a solicitation is not practical, the Contracting Officer shall

annotate the contract file with the rationale for the decision. No annotation is required for classified

solicitations.

Subpart 5605.2 - SYNOPSES OF PROPOSED CONTRACT

ACTIONS
5605.207 Preparation and Transmittal of Synopses.

(a)

(i) Contracting offices must use the Government Point of Entry (GPE) at beta.SAM to submit

synopses to the maximum extent possible.

(ii) When release of government controlled technical data is required in a solicitation, the synopsis

will include a statement for potential offerors to identify whether or not they are foreign owned,

controlled, or influenced companies.

Subpart 5605.3 - SYNOPSES OF CONTRACT AWARDS

5605.302 Preparation and Transmittal of Synopses of Awards.

(Revised November 2018 )

(i) Contracting officers must not post or attach the actual contract document to contract award

synopses posted to the GPE. SOF AT&L-KM/KX/KB and the legal staff must approve all requests for

exception to this policy.

(ii) A security review is required for contract award synopsis and public announcements not exempt

IAW 5.202(a)(1), National Security, and must be filed with the public award announcement in the

contract file.

5605.303 Announcement of Contract Awards.

(Revised June 2021)

See the DCG for additional guidance, procedures, and suggested formats.

Subpart 5605.4 - RELEASE OF INFORMATION

(Added November 2018)

5605.403 Requests from Members of Congress

The release of information must be coordinated with SOF AT&L-KM/KX/KB as appropriate.

HQ, United States Special Operations Command

Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L)
SOFARS 5605

February 2007
Part 210 - MARKET RESEARCH

210.001 Policy.

210.002 Procedures.

Parent topic: Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation

210.001 Policy.

(a) In addition to the requirements of FAR 10.001(a)—

(i)(A) Agencies shall conduct market research appropriate to the circumstances before issuing a

solicitation with tiered evaluation of offers (section 816 of Pub. L. 109-163); and

(B) Use the results of market research to determine whether the criteria in FAR part 19 are met for

setting aside the acquisition for small business or, for a task or delivery order, whether there are a

sufficient number of qualified small business concerns available to justify limiting competition under

the terms of the contract. If the contracting officer cannot determine whether the criteria are met,

the contracting officer shall include a written explanation in the contract file as to why such a

determination could not be made (section 816 of Pub. L. 109-163).

(ii) Contracting officers shall use market research, where appropriate, to inform price

reasonableness determinations (see 212.209 and 234.7002).

(c)(2) In addition to the notification requirements at FAR 10.001(c)(2)(i) and (ii), see 205.205-70 for

the bundling notification publication requirement.

210.002 Procedures.

(e)(i) When contracting for services, see PGI 210.070 , for the “Market Research Report Guide for

Improving the Tradecraft in Services Acquisition”.

(ii) See PGI 210.002 (e)(ii) regarding potential offerors that express an interest in an acquisition.

(iii) Follow the procedures at PGI 210.002 (e)(iii) regarding contract file documentation.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Authority:

7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 800.188 Crop year, variety, and origin statements.

No official personnel shall certify or otherwise state in writing (a) the year of production of grain, including use of terms such as “new crop” or “old crop”; (b) the place or geographical area where the grain was grown; or (c) the variety of the grain.
235.016 Broad agency announcement.       (a)  *General*.  A broad agency announcement with peer or scientific review may be used for the award of science and technology proposals.  Science and technology proposals include proposals for the following:          (i)  Basic research (budget activity 6.1).          (ii)  Applied research (budget activity 6.2).          (iii)  Advanced technology development (budget activity 6.3).          (iv)  Advanced component development and prototypes (budget activity 6.4).    **Parent topic:** Part 235 - RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2996 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-(2H-Benzotriazol-2-yl)-4,6-bis(1,1- 

dimethylpropyl)phenol. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 24, 2006 

Mr. DEMINT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-(2H-Benzotriazol-2- 

yl)-4,6-bis(1,1-dimethylpropyl)phenol. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2-(2H-BENZOTRIAZOL-2-YL)-4,6-BIS(1,1- 

4 DIMETHYLPROPYL)PHENOL. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.38.12 2-(2H-Benzotriazol-2-yl)-4,6-bis(1,1- 

dimethylpropyl)phenol (CAS No. 25973– 

55–1) (provided for in subheading 

3812.30.60) ............................................. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 2996 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

§ 800.173 Examinations and reexaminations. ( a ) *General.* Applicants for a license and individuals who are licensed to perform any or all official inspection or Class X or Class Y weighing services shall, at the discretion of the Service, submit to examinations or reexaminations to determine their competency to perform the official inspection or weighing functions for which they desire to be, or are, licensed.
( b ) *Time and place of examinations and reexaminations.* Examinations or reexaminations under this section shall be conducted by official personnel designated by the Service and shall be given at a reasonable time and place in accordance with the instructions.
( c ) *Scope of examinations and reexaminations.* Examinations or reexaminations may include oral or written tests on the applicable provisions of the Act, the regulations, the Official U.S. Standards for Grain, the procedures for the inspection and weighing of grain under the Act, the instructions, on-site performance evaluations, and vision or olfactory examinations.
( d ) *Competency standards* — ( 1 ) *Inspection.* An individual may be found to be incompetent to perform official inspection services if the individual ( i ) has a color-vision deficiency;
( ii ) cannot meet the physical requirements necessary to perform the functions;
( iii ) cannot readily distinguish between the different kinds and classes of grain, or the different conditions in grain, including heating, musty, sour, insect infestation, and smut;
( iv ) cannot demonstrate a technical ability to operate grain sampling, testing, and grading equipment;
( v ) does not have a working knowledge of applicable provisions of the Act, the regulations, the Official U.S. Standards for Grain, and the instructions;
( vi ) cannot determine work-related mathematical computations; or
( vii ) cannot prepare legible records in English.
( 2 ) *Weighing.* An individual may be found to be incompetent to perform Class X or Class Y weighing services under the Act if the individual ( i ) does not meet the requirements of paragraphs (d)(1)(ii), (v), (vi), and (vii) of this section or
( ii ) cannot demonstrate a technical ability to operate grain weighing equipment.
#### Luis Gonzalez, Appellant, v Turner Construction Company, Respondent.

[815 NYS2d 179]

*631In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated June 3, 2005, as granted that branch of the defendant’s cross motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action to recover damages for a violation of Labor Law § 240 (1), and denied his motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability on that cause of action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff was standing on a roof “shifting” an 800-foot rope with two other workers who were below roof level when he was pulled forward and struck a beam. He commenced this action, inter alia, to recover damages based upon a violation of Labor Law § 240 (1).

Labor Law § 240 (1) provides exceptional protection for workers against the “special hazards” that arise when either the work site itself is elevated or is positioned below the level where materials or load are being hoisted or secured *(see Narducci v Manhasset Bay Assoc.,*96 NY2d 259, 267-268 [2001]; *Ross v Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Elec. Co.,*81 NY2d 494, 500-501 [1993]; *Rocovich v Consolidated Edison Co.,*78 NY2d 509, 514-515 [1991]; *Jiron v China Buddhist Assn.,*266 AD2d 347 [1999]). These special hazards do not encompass any and all perils that may be connected in some tangential way with the effects of gravity. Rather, they are limited to such specific gravity-related accidents as falling from a height or being struck by a falling object that was improperly hoisted or inadequately secured *(see Narducci v Manhasset Bay Assoc., supra; Ross v Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Elec. Co., supra; Rocovich v Consolidated Edison Co., supra; Jiron v China Buddhist Assn., supra).*Here, in support of its cross motion for summary judgment, the defendant demonstrated, prima facie, that the plaintiffs alleged injuries did not arise from a violation of Labor Law § 240 (1) *(see Ross v Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Elec. Co., supra).*In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Thus, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant summary judgment dismissing the cause of action to recover damages pursuant to Labor Law § 240 (1).

The plaintiffs remaining contention is without merit. Ritter, J.P., Mastro, Lunn and Covello, JJ., concur.