alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

BENJAMIN F. GRAHAM, II,,

Petitioner,

v. 4:20cv211–WS/HTC

MARK S. INCH, Secretary 

Florida Department of 

Corrections,

Respondent.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF

No. 13) docketed June 14, 2022. The magistrate judge recommends that

Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus be DENIED. Petitioner has filed

objections (ECF No. 14) to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. 

The undersigned has reviewed the record in light of Petitioner’s objections

but finds no basis upon which to reject the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation. The undersigned agrees that Petitioner has failed to demonstrate

Case 4:20-cv-00211-WS-HTC Document 15 Filed 06/28/22 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

that he is entitled to relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (ECF No. 13) is

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order.

2. Petitioner’s § 2254 habeas corpus petition (ECF No. 1) is DENIED.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

4. The clerk shall close the case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 28th day of June , 2022.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:20-cv-00211-WS-HTC Document 15 Filed 06/28/22 Page 2 of 2
252.236-7000 Modification Proposals—Price

Breakdown.

As prescribed in 236.570 (a), use the following clause:

MODIFICATION PROPOSALS—PRICE BREAKDOWN (DEC 1991)

(a) The Contractor shall furnish a price breakdown, itemized as required and within the time

specified by the Contracting Officer, with any proposal for a contract modification.

(b) The price breakdown—

(1) Must include sufficient detail to permit an analysis of profit, and of all costs for—

(i) Material;

(ii) Labor;

(iii) Equipment;

(iv) Subcontracts; and

(v) Overhead; and

(2) Must cover all work involved in the modification, whether the work was deleted, added, or

changed.

(c) The Contractor shall provide similar price breakdowns to support any amounts claimed for

subcontracts.

(d) The Contractor's proposal shall include a justification for any time extension proposed.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 252.236 RESERVED
#### Frank C. Bolt, Respondent, *v.*Mary Keyhoe, Appellant.

(Submitted June 3,1884;

decided June 17, 1884.)

*JEllsworth ds Potter*for appellant.

*647
      *E. O. Ho/rt*for respondent.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Order affirmed.
# L_2020102DE.01001701.xml

| 2.4.2020 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 102/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2020

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 102/17

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 379/2014 der Kommission vom 7. April 2014 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 965/2012 der Kommission zur Festlegung technischer Vorschriften und von Verwaltungsverfahren in Bezug auf den Flugbetrieb gemäß der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 216/2008 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 123 vom 24. April 2014
  )

Auf Seite 16, Anhang I Nummer 3 zur Änderung des Anhangs III der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 965/2012, Buchstabe ad Ziffer i zur Änderung von ORO.FC.105 Buchstabe c Satz 1:

Anstatt:

| „i) | in Buchstabe c erster Satz werden die Wörter ‚im Fall des gewerblichen Betriebs von Flugzeugen und Hubschraubern‘ nach ‚Verordnung (EG) Nr. 216/2008 ist‘ eingefügt;“ |
| --- | --- |

„i)

in Buchstabe c erster Satz werden die Wörter ‚im Fall des gewerblichen Betriebs von Flugzeugen und Hubschraubern‘ nach ‚Verordnung (EG) Nr. 216/2008 ist‘ eingefügt;“

muss es heißen:

| „i) | Buchstabe c Satz 1 erhält folgende Fassung: ‚Im Fall des gewerblichen Betriebs von Flugzeugen und Hubschraubern muss der verantwortliche Pilot/Kommandant oder der Pilot, dem ggf. die Durchführung des Flugs übertragen wurde, eine Erstschulung zum Vertrautmachen mit der vorgesehenen Flugstrecke oder dem zu befliegenden Bereich und den zu benutzenden Flugplätzen, Einrichtungen und Verfahren absolviert haben.‘“ |
| --- | --- |

„i)

Buchstabe c Satz 1 erhält folgende Fassung: ‚Im Fall des gewerblichen Betriebs von Flugzeugen und Hubschraubern muss der verantwortliche Pilot/Kommandant oder der Pilot, dem ggf. die Durchführung des Flugs übertragen wurde, eine Erstschulung zum Vertrautmachen mit der vorgesehenen Flugstrecke oder dem zu befliegenden Bereich und den zu benutzenden Flugplätzen, Einrichtungen und Verfahren absolviert haben.‘“

---
Subpart 227.3 - PATENT RIGHTS UNDER

GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS

Parent topic: Part 227 - PATENTS, DATA, AND COPYRIGHTS

227.303 Contract clauses.

(1) Use the clause at 252.227-7039 , Patents—Reporting of Subject Inventions, in solicitations and

contracts containing the clause at FAR 52.227-11, Patent Rights—Ownership by the Contractor.

(2)(i) Use the clause at 252.227-7038 , Patent Rights—Ownership by the Contractor (Large

Business), instead of the clause at FAR 52.227-11, in solicitations and contracts for experimental,

developmental, or research work if—

(A) The contractor is other than a small business concern or nonprofit organization; and

(B) No alternative patent rights clause is used in accordance with FAR 27.303(c) or (e).

(ii) Use the clause with its Alternate I if—

(A) The acquisition of patent rights for the benefit of a foreign government is required under a treaty

or executive agreement;

(B) The agency head determines at the time of award that it would be in the national interest to

acquire the right to sublicense foreign governments or international organizations pursuant to any

existing or future treaty or agreement; or

(C) Other rights are necessary to effect a treaty or agreement, in which case Alternate I may be

appropriately modified.

(iii) Use the clause with its Alternate II in long-term contracts if necessary to effect treaty or

agreements to be entered into.

227.304 Procedures.

227.304-1 General.

Interim and final invention reports and notification of all subcontracts for experimental,

developmental, or research work may be submitted on DD Form 882, Report of Inventions and

Subcontracts.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications

  I, Michelle Gill, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A and all reports on Form 10-D
     required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report
     on Form 10-K/A of GSAA Home Equity Trust 2006-15 (the "Exchange Act
     periodic reports");

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
     light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
     fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
     material respects; and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
     criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
     reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
     asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
     accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
     13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
     except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances
     of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
     this report on Form 10-K/A.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
     information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
     Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as
     Master Servicer and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Securities Administrator.

     Dated: June 30, 2008

     /s/ Michelle Gill
     Michelle Gill, Vice President
     (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 56 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 56 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 2 of 2
§ 623.6 Transfer of lands from the CRP to the EWRP. Land that is subject to an existing CRP contract administered under 7 CFR parts 704 and 1410 may be transferred into the EWRP only if: ( a ) The land and landowner(s) meet the requirements of this part; and
( b ) The application for transfer into the EWRP is approved by Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC), if found to be in the interest of the program. If such transfer is requested by the owner and approved by CCC, the CRP contract for the property will be terminated or otherwise modified subject to such terms and conditions as are mutually agreed by the landowner, CCC, and NRCS.
#### § 70.35 Withdrawal of application.

An application for grading service may be withdrawn by the applicant at any time before the service is performed upon payment by the applicant, of all expenses incurred by the AMS in connection with such application.

[71 FR 42013, July 24, 2006. Redesignated as 84 FR 49643, Sept. 23, 2019]
Second Department,

January, 1980

(January 14, 1980) 

#### In the Matter of William Cahn, Petitioner. Joint Bar Association Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, Respondent.

Motion by petitioner, a disbarred attorney, (1) to vacate or modify this court’s order dated October 24,1977, which disbarred him and the removal of his name from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law, (2) to deem said order one of suspension for the purpose of the present proceeding, (3) to set aside the suspension pending determination of the present proceeding, (4) to refer the matter to a Referee, Justice or Judge appointed by this court for a *1023hearing, and (5) to impose such discipline as this court deems just and proper under the circumstances. Motion denied. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Damiani, Titone and Mangano, JJ., concur.
Case 5:03-cr-00054-MCR-MD   Document 191   Filed 12/02/08   Page 1 of 1
Part 5146 - Quality Assurance

Subpart 5146.5 - Acceptance

5146.501 General.

5146.503 Place of acceptance.

Subpart 5146.7 - Warranties

5146.702 General.

Subpart 5146.5 - Acceptance

5146.501 General.

Include acceptance documentation as a permanent part of the contract file prior to contract closure.

5146.503 Place of acceptance.

When contemplating destination acceptance in solicitations and contracts, contracting officers

shall—

(1) Verify the Department of Defense Activity Address Code (DoDAAC) of each receiving activity in

the solicitation or contract (DoDAAC verification information is available via the Internet at

https://www.transactionservices.dla.mil/daasinq/ );

(2) Prior to assigning acceptance responsibility, ensure that there is a registered acceptor available

in Wide Area Workflow (WAWF) for each destination acceptance point (WAWF acceptor information

is available at https://wawf.eb.mil under “Active DoDAACs and Roles”);

(3) When no WAWF acceptor is available at destination, use source acceptance or “acceptance at

other” in WAWF;

(4) Not designate destination acceptance at a contractor location, but shall instead clearly designate

a Government acceptance point within Section E of the contract schedule; and

(5) Clearly define the acceptance procedures in Section E.

Subpart 5146.7 - Warranties

5146.702 General.

(c) See Army Regulation 700-139 for procedures on tracking and accumulating data on warranty
costs.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2742 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2742

 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 4-amino-2,5-dimethoxy-N-
                       phenylbenzene sulfonamide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 4, 2006

 Mr. Reed (for himself and Mr. Chafee) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 4-amino-2,5-dimethoxy-N-
                       phenylbenzene sulfonamide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 4-AMINO-2,5-DIMETHOXY-N-PHENYLBENZENE SULFONAMIDE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.29.73 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 4-amino-2,5-dimethoxy-N-
phenylbenzene sulfonamide) is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
5119.1405 Service-disabled veteran-owned

small business set-aside procedures.

(d) The head of the contracting activity shall make the decision as stated in FAR 19.1405(d). See

Appendix GG for further delegation.

Parent topic: Subpart 5119.14 - Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Procurement

Program
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Everton Lazarus, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered December 15,1978, convicting him of manslaughter in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, and new trial ordered. The conduct of the prosecutrix in forcing the defendant to characterize the testimony of prosecution witnesses, including a policeman and an assistant principal, as either lies or, at least, mistakes, was improper. This court has repeatedly advised prosecutors that this is a practice which will not be tolerated (see, e.g., *People v Perez,*69 AD2d 891; *People v Webb,*68 AD2d 331). It was particularly egregious in the instant case where defendant was the sole defense witness and presented a justification defense. All other eyewitnesses, save one, were friends of the decedent. The only witness who testified that defendant made the fatal knife thrust was a friend of decedent’s girlfriend. Thus, the issue of credibility was crucial. The prosecutrix attacked the defendants credibility unfairly by the series of questions indicated. In addition, she asked defendant about a prior incident with a knife without making any showing of a good faith basis. Indeed, questioning about a knife possession charge arising out of that same prior incident had been excluded at the *Sandoval*hearing. This behavior was so damaging to the defendant that a new trial is required notwithstanding counsels failure to object. Hopkins, J. P., Gulotta, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Gaines, Appellant

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered January 8, 1979, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial ordered. Although intent is not a statutory element of the crime charged, where there is evidence in the record that defendant’s possession of the weapon might have been innocent, the jury should be instructed that it might find such possession to be innocent (see *People v Trucchio, 47*AD2d 934). We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Cohalan, J. P., Hargett, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
213.7002 Purchase orders.       The contracting officer need not obtain a contractor’s written acceptance of a purchase order or modification of a purchase order for an acquisition under the 8(a) Program pursuant to 219.804-2(2).    **Parent topic:** Subpart 213.70 - SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES UNDER THE 8(A) PROGRAM
### Lowry, Nick (OST) From: 

### Sent: To: 

### Cc: Subject:
Mr. Edelman and Mr. Hainbach, Lowry, Nick (OST) Thursday, April 11, 2013 10:29 AM B. Edelman (bedelman@hbs.edu); Don Hainbach (dhainbach@ggh-airlaw.com) Podberesky, Samuel (OST); Arshad, Amna (OST); Dols, Jonathan (OST); Graber, Kimberly (OST) Your Joint Motion ofApril 10, 2013 Dkt. OST 2013-0025 (Complaint of B. Edelman v. British Airways) By this e-mail, we are notifying the parties that we at the Office ofAviation Enforcement 

### & Proceedings grantyourjoint motion ofApril10 providing for a second round of pleadings in the above-referenced docket. The parties have agreed that Mr. Edelman will file his reply by April19, 2013, and that American's response will be filed by May 3, 2013. I will place this e-mail in the docket. Regards, 

### :\icholas l,owry SeniorAllorw:y Olricc oL'hiatiou Enl(m:cmcnl 

### & Procccdiugs O!Iicc

# or the General Counsel 

## t:.S. Depl. 

### ofTransportation I . i**~**
, .....:·:.

· .•.' i

1
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,__________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A14D0434. EDDIE LEE JINKS v. THE STATE.

Eddie Jinks seeks to appeal the trial court’s order denying his motion for an out

of time appeal. An order denying a motion for an out of time appeal, however, is a

directly appealable order. See, e.g., Lunsford v. State, 237 Ga. App. 696 (515 SE2d

198) (1999).

When a party applies for discretionary review of a directly appealable order,

we grant the application under OCGA § 5-6-35 (j). Accordingly, this application is

hereby GRANTED. Jinks shall have 10 days from the date of this order to file a

notice of appeal with the trial court. The trial court is instructed to include a copy of

this order in the appellate record.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,__________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

07/23/2014

July 23, 2014
**Exhibit99.1**

 

**Report of Independent RegisteredPublic Accounting Firm**

 

 

Board of Directors and Stockholders

Video Display Corporation

Tucker, Georgia

 

We have reviewed the condensed consolidatedbalance sheet of Video Display Corporation as of November 30, 2004, and therelated condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive incomefor the three-month and nine-month periods ended November 30, 2004 and 2003,and cash flows for the nine-month periods ended November 30, 2004 and 2003included in the accompanying Securities and Exchange Commission Form 10-Q forthe period ended November 30, 2004. These interim financial statements are theresponsibility of the Company’s management.

 

We conducted our reviews in accordance withthe standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight  Board (United States). A review of interimfinancial information consists principally of applying analytical proceduresand making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accountingmatters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted inaccordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board,the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financialstatements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

 

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of anymaterial modifications that should be made to the condensed consolidatedfinancial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity withaccounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

We have previously audited, in accordancewith the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, theconsolidated balance sheet of Video Display Corporation as of February 29,2004, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensiveincome, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (notpresented herein); and in our report dated May 14, 2004, we expressed anunqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion,the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balancesheet as of February 29, 2004 is fairly stated in all material respects inrelation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.

 
| /s/ BDO Seidman, LLP |   |
|----------------------|--------|
|                 |   |
| Atlanta, Georgia     |   |
| January 13, 2005     |   |

 

 

28

----
Editorial Note on Subpart ECFR7b3ee71a250c28d of Part 799
Editorial Note: At 81 FR 51295, Aug. 3, 2016, subpart F was revised; however, the subpart F heading was published erroneously as a second subpart E.

§ 799.54 Draft EIS. ( a ) FSA will prepare the draft EIS addressing the information specified in § 799.53.
( b ) FSA will circulate the draft EIS as specified in 40 CFR 1502.19.
( c ) In addition to the requirements of 40 CFR 1502.19, FSA will request comments on the draft EIS from: ( 1 ) Appropriate State and local agencies authorized to develop and enforce environmental standards relevant to the scope of the EIS;
( 2 ) Tribal governments that have interests that could be impacted; and
( 3 ) If the proposed action affects historic properties, the appropriate SHPO, THPO, and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.
( d ) FSA will file the draft EIS with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as specified in 40 CFR 1506.9 and in accordance with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency filing requirements (available at *http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/submiteis/index.html*).
( e ) The draft EIS will include a cover sheet with the information specified in 40 CFR 1502.11.
( f ) FSA will provide for a minimum 45-day comment period calculated from the date the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency publishes the NOA of the draft EIS.
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 237 (Friday, December 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 77044]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31083]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Financial Management Service; Privacy Act of 1974, as Amended; 
System of Records

AGENCY: Financial Management Service, Treasury.

ACTION: Withdrawal of a Privacy Act Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury is withdrawing the proposed 
system of records notice published on behalf of the Financial 
Management Service.

DATES: December 10, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dale Underwood, Privacy Act officer, 
Department of the Treasury, (202) 622-0874.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department of the Treasury is 
withdrawing the proposed system of records notice, ``Treasury/FMS .008-
Mailing List Records'' (Document Number 2010-30297), published on 
December 3, 2010, at 75 FR 75546. The document will be revised and 
reissued with additional details and a new 30-day comment period. 
However, any comments received on the withdrawn notice will also be 
considered.

    Dated: December 6, 2010.
Melissa Hartman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Privacy, Transparency, and Records.
[FR Doc. 2010-31083 Filed 12-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-P
```