alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
252.251-7001 Use of Interagency Fleet

Management System (IFMS) Vehicles and

Related Services.

As prescribed in 251.205 , use the following clause:

USE OF INTERAGENCY FLEET MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (IFMS) VEHICLES AND RELATED

SERVICES (DEC 1991)

(a) The Contractor, if authorized use of IFMS vehicles, shall submit requests for five or fewer

vehicles and related services in writing to the appropriate General Services Administration (GSA)

Regional Customer Service Bureau, Attention: Motor Equipment Activity. Submit requests for more

than five vehicles to GSA headquarters: General Services Administration, FTM, Washington, DC

20406. Include the following in each request:

(1) Two copies of the agency authorization to obtain vehicles and related services from GSA.

(2) The number of vehicles and related services required and the period of use.

(3) A list of the Contractor's employees authorized to request vehicles and related services.

(4) A list of the makes, models, and serial numbers of Contractor-owned or leased equipment

authorized to be serviced.

(5) Billing instructions and address.

(b) The Contractor should make requests for any unusual quantities of vehicles as far in advance as

possible.

(c) The Contractor shall establish and enforce suitable penalties for employees who use or authorize

the use of Government vehicles for other than performance of Government contracts.

(d) The Contractor shall assume, without the right of reimbursement from the Government, the cost

or expense of any use of IFMS vehicles and services not related to the performance of the contract.

(e) Only the Contractor may request authorization for subcontractor use of IFMS vehicles. The

Contracting Officer will not grant authorization for subcontractor use without approval of the

Contractor.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 252.251 RESERVED
5649.607 Delinquency Notices.    *(Revised November 2007)*       Any actions relating to delinquent contractors, including Termination for Default, Cure Notice, and Show Cause Notice, must be coordinated with legal counsel. A copy of all Cure and Show Cause Notices to small business firms must be furnished to the OSBP concurrent to the notice being sent to the contractor. The contractor's response or lack of response within the allotted time period, as well as any relevant documentation related to the contractor's response, must be furnished to legal counsel for review on all contracts.              HQ, United States Special Operations Command       Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L-K)       SOFARS 5649       February 2007 **Parent topic:** Subpart 5649.6 - CONTRACT TERMINATION FORMS AND FORMATS
#### § 632.10 Applicability.

This program applies to any county or other designated area within a State that had abandoned or inadequately reclaimed coal-mined lands within its borders before August 3, 1977.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

§ 868.61 How to request appeal inspection service. ( a ) *General.* Requests shall be made with the field office responsible for the area in which the original service was performed. Requests for Board appeal inspections may be made with the Board of Appeals and Review or the field office that performed the appeal inspection. Verbal requests must be confirmed in writing, upon request, as specified in § 868.21. Copies of request forms may be obtained from the field office upon request. If at the time the request is made the documentation required by § 868.21 is not available, official personnel may, at their discretion, withhold service pending the receipt of the required documentation.
( b ) *Request requirements.* ( 1 ) This subparagraph is applicable to rice inspection only. Except as may be agreed upon by the interested persons, the application shall be made: ( i ) Before the rice has left the place where the inspection being appealed was performed and
( ii ) no later than the close of business on the second business day following the date of the inspection being appealed. However, the Administrator may extend the time requirement as deemed necessary.
( 2 ) Subject to the limitations of paragraph (b)(3) of this section, the applicant may request that an appeal inspection be based on: ( i ) The file sample or
( ii ) a new sample. However, an appeal inspection shall be based on a new sample only if the lot can positively be identified by official personnel as the one that was previously inspected and the entire lot is available and accessible for sampling and inspection. Board appeals shall be on the basis of the file sample.
( 3 ) An appeal inspection shall be limited to a review of the sampling procedure and an analysis of the file sample when, as a result of a previous inspection, the commodity was found to be contaminated with filth (other than insect fragments in nongraded processed products) or to contain a deleterious substance. If it is determined that the sampling procedures were improper, a new sample shall be obtained if the lot can be positively identified as the lot which was previously inspected and the entire lot is available and accessible for sampling and inspection.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0580-0012) [53 FR 3722, Feb. 9, 1988. Redesignated and amended at 60 FR 16364, Mar. 30, 1995]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3111 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3111

 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain printed circuit assemblies 
     and other parts of measuring equipment for telecommunications.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain printed circuit assemblies 
     and other parts of measuring equipment for telecommunications.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN PRINTED CIRCUIT ASSEMBLIES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.90.30        Printed circuit         Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           assemblies for                                                    31/2009          ''
                           instruments and                                                                     .
                           apparatus for
                           measuring or checking
                           electrical
                           quantities, specially
                           designed for
                           telecommunications
                           (provided for in
                           subheading
                           9030.90.88)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 782

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 782 appear at 61 FR 32643, June 25, 1996.

#### § 782.1 Basis and purpose.

The regulations contained in this part are issued pursuant to and in accordance with Section 321(f) of the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act. These regulations govern the establishment of the end-use certificate program, the completion of end-use certificates, the identification of commodities requiring end-use certificates, the submission of reports, and the keeping of records and making of reports incident thereto.
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.14





December 31, 2017




Re:    Renewal of Amended and Restated Retention Agreement
Dear David:
This letter is to serve as your notification that Ply Gem Industries, Inc. has elected to execute its Renewal Term right under your current Amended and Restated Retention Agreement dated December 31, 2008 for a period of one year.  As such, all applicable rights and terms as outlined in your Amended and Restated Retention Agreement will remain in effect through December 31, 2018.
Please sign this letter in the space provided below as your acknowledgment and agreement of this Renewal Term agreement and return this original to me, and retain a copy for your own records.


	
		
	 
	Sincerely,

	 
	 

	 
	PLY GEM INDUSTRIES, INC.

	 
	 

	 
	By:  /s/ Gary E. Robinette

	 
	Name:  Gary E. Robinette

	 
	Title:  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	Acknowledged and Agreed:
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	/s/ David N. Schmoll
	 

	David N. Schmoll
Editorial Note on Part 91
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 91 appear at 61 FR 51350, Oct. 2 1996.

§ 91.28 Issuance of corrected certificates or amendments for analysis reports. ( a ) A corrected certificate of analysis or an amended letter report may be issued by the laboratory representative who issued the original certificate or report after distribution of the form if errors, such as incorrect dates, analytical results, or test determination statements, lot numbers, or errors in any other pertinent information require the issuance of a corrected certificate or an amended report.
( b ) Whenever a corrected certificate or amended report is issued, such certificate or report shall supersede the original form which was issued in error. The superseded certificate or incorrect report shall become null and void after the issuance of the corrected certificate or the amended analysis report.
( c ) The corrected certificates or amended reports shall show the following: ( 1 ) The terms “Corrected Original” and “Corrected Copy;”
( 2 ) A statement identifying the superseded certificate or incorrect letter report and the corrections;
( 3 ) A new serial number or new date of issuance; and
( 4 ) The same statements and information, including permissive statements, that were shown on the incorrect certificate or the incorrect report, along with the correct statement or information, shall be shown on the corrected form.
( d ) If all copies of the incorrect certificate or incorrect report can be obtained, then the superseded form shall be marked “Void” when submitted.
( e ) Corrected certificates or amended letter reports cannot be issued for a certificate that has been superseded by another certificate, or superseded on the basis of a subsequent analysis or an additional laboratory test determination.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION

TERRY DEESE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 1:06cv643-MHT

) (WO) 

HOMES OF LEGEND, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the joint stipulation of dismissal

(Doc. No. 74), it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of

the court that this cause is dismissed with prejudice,

with costs taxed as paid.

The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this

document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant

to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

DONE, this the 9th day of January, 2009.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 75 Filed 01/09/09 Page 1 of 1
5135.006 Contracting methods and contract

type.

(b)(i) The contracting officer cannot release the solicitation until the milestone decision authority

approves the contract method and contract type.

Parent topic: Part 5135 - Research and Development Contracting
NO. 12-08-00346-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

§

IN RE: MICHAEL KENNEDY,

RELATOR § ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

§

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Relator Michael Kennedy seeks a writ of mandamus requiring the trial court to enter a

summary judgment in Kennedy’s favor in a civil rights action pending in the 369th Judicial District

Court of Anderson County, Texas. 

Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy and was intended to be available “only in situations

involving manifest and urgent necessity and not for grievances that may be addressed by other

remedies.” Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 840 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). For Kennedy

to be entitled to relief by mandamus, he must meet two requirements. First, he must show that the

trial court clearly abused its discretion. Id. Second, he must show that he lacks an adequate remedy

at law, such as an ordinary appeal. See id. Here, Kennedy requests that we direct the trial court to

enter a summary judgment in his favor. However, mandamus cannot be used to tell the trial court

how to rule. See In re Castle Prod. Ltd. P’ship, 189 S.W.3d 400, 403 (Tex. App.–Tyler 2006, orig.

proceeding). Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. 

Opinion delivered September 10, 2008.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)
225.7003-2 Restrictions.       (a) The following restrictions implement 10 U.S.C. 4863. Except as provided in 225.7003-3 —          (1) Do not acquire the following items, or any components of the following items, unless any specialty metals contained in the items or components are melted or produced in the United States (also see guidance at 225.7003-2 (a)):          (i) Aircraft.          (ii) Missile or space systems.          (iii) Ships.          (iv) Tank or automotive items.          (v) Weapon systems.          (vi) Ammunition.          (2) Do not acquire a specialty metal (e.g., raw stock, including bar, billet, slab, wire, plate, and sheet; castings; and forgings) as an end item, unless the specialty metal is melted or produced in the United States. This restriction applies to specialty metal acquired by a contractor for delivery to DoD as an end item, in addition to specialty metal acquired by DoD directly from the entity that melted or produced the specialty metal.          (b) For more information on specialty metals restrictions and reporting of noncompliances, see                https://www.acq.osd.mil/asda/dpc/cp/ic/specialty-metals-restrictions.html            .    **Parent topic:** 225.7003 Restrictions on acquisition of specialty metals.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3085 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Brotje upper heads and lower rams 

for skin fastener machines. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. BROWNBACK introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Brotje upper heads 

and lower rams for skin fastener machines. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BROTJE UPPER HEADS AND LOWER RAMS FOR 

4 SKIN FASTENER MACHINES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.84.66 Brotje upper heads and lower rams for 

skin fastener machines (provided for in 

subheading 8466.92.50) .......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 3085 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
#### Robert L. Trudeau, Appellant, v. Harry Michelson, Respondent.

Staley, Jr., J.

Appeal from an order of County Court of Schenectady County denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. On June 8, 1964, plaintiff and defendant entered into a written contract which provided for certain work, labor and services to be performed by the plaintiff, a licensed architect. He agreed to prepare working drawings and specifications for the construction of a proposed motel at a total cost of $2,500, plus the cost of printing. The total balance was to become due upon submission to the defendant of 15 complete sets of drawings which condition has been met. The total cost, including printing, amounts to the sum of $2,606.20, and the defendant has paid the sum of $2,355. He has refused to pay the balance claiming that, under the agreement, the plaintiff was obliged to perform one inspection of the project each month during the course of construction, for which service he was to be paid the sum of $250, which sum was included in the total sum of $2,500. Respondent bases his defense on the fact that an unsigned draft of the agreement provided for one monthly inspection during the progress of the work, although he admits that such a provision was omitted from the final executed agreement. He further contends that he stated to the plaintiff the “ understanding between them that the balance of $250 would be paid at $50 per month during the construction, and plaintiff concurred”. The executed agreement involved here provides “Item B. Work not included: (c) Periodic inspection of the construction ”. The agreement is clear and unambiguous and there is nothing in the language of the agreement that presents a triable issue. “ It has long been the rule that when a contract is clear in and of itself, circumstances extrinsic to the document may not be considered *(General Phoenix Corp.*v. *Cabot,*300 N. Y. 87) and that where the intention of the parties may be gathered from the four comers of the instrument, interpretation of the contract is a question of law and no trial is necessary to determine the legal effect of the contract”. *(Bethlehem Steel Co.*v. *Turner Constr. Co.,*2 N Y 2d 456, 460.) Order reversed, on the law and the facts, and motion for summary judgment granted, with costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur in a memorandum decision by Staley, Jr., J.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA OF

NORTHERN DIVISION

CAREY EDWARD WINFIELD, #180239, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-662-MEF

)

CAPT. SYLVESTER NETTLES, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

O R D E R

There being no objections filed to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge

entered on October 10, 2006 (Doc. #11), said Recommendation is hereby adopted and it is

the

ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice

for plaintiff's failure to prosecute this action and comply with the orders of this court.

DONE this the 2nd day of November, 2006.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00662-MEF-CSC Document 12 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### § 4284.7 Electronic submission.

Applicants and grant awardees are encouraged, but not required, to submit applications and reports in electronic form as prescribed in requests for proposals issued by USDA and in the applicable grant agreements.
U.S. Department of Transportation Office of the Secretary of Transportation

Christina K. Ross-Cantu Director ofCorporate Development Accent Travel 3737 Executive CenterDrive Suite 100 Austin, Texas 78731

DearMs. Ross-Cantu: GENERAL COUNSEL October 21, 2014 1200 NewJerseyAvenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Comment submittedto Docket DOT-OST-2014-0056

Thank you for your letter to Secretary ofTransportation Anthony Foxx expressing your views about the U.S. Department of Transportation's May 23, 2014, notice of proposed rulemaking covering various consumer protection issues, including issues related to the transparency of airline ancillary service fees. Secretary Foxx asked me to respond onhis behalf. We appreciate you taking the time to provide comments on the proposals. All ofthe comments received, including yours, will be considered when making a final determination on the proposals. In accordance with Department rules applicable to pending proceedings, a copy of your letter was placed in ourrulemaking docket. A copy ofthis response will also be placed inthe docket. IfI canprovide additional information or assistance, please feel free to contactme.
Sincerely,

Blane A. Workie ActingAssistant General Counsel for

Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings
EX-4.1






Exhibit 4.1




Dividend Reinvestment Plan — Participation Form



Only residents of Canada and the United States are eligible to participate in the Plan.



Do not complete this form if you wish to receive cash dividends only.



I wish to participate in the Dividend Reinvestment Plan (the “Plan”) of Brookfield Properties
Corporation (the “company”). I hereby instruct the company to forward to the Agent under the Plan




50%                            or                            100%



of all cash dividends paid on all common shares of the company now or subsequently registered in my
name and direct the Agent to invest such dividends in common shares of the company in accordance
with the provisions of the Plan. I acknowledge that I have read the Plan and that my participation
in the Plan will be subject to its terms and conditions. I also acknowledge that this authorization                                
to                                 enroll
             
         my common shares will remain in effect until I notify the Agent in writing in accordance with the Plan.






	 	 	 
	Date
	 	Signature of Registered Shareholder
	 
	 	 
	Registered Shareholder Account Number
	 	Printed Name of Registered Shareholder
	(see Distribution Cheque)
	 	 






Daytime Telephone Number




Notes:





	1.	 	Tick the appropriate box to indicate your preference. Where no preference is indicated, 100%
of the cash dividends paid on all common shares registered in your name will be reinvested.






	2.	 	If common shares are held jointly, all holders must sign. All signatures should be exactly as
they appear on the share certificate(s).






	3.	 	If your common shares are held in more than one account, a separate participation form must
be completed for each account that you wish to participate.






	4.	 	Where a participation form is executed on behalf of a corporation, partnership, association,
agency, estate or trust, the Agent may require submission of satisfactory evidence of
authority of the person executing the form.






	5.	 	The Plan is administered by CIBC Mellon Trust Company. You can contact CIBC Mellon Trust
Company at 416-643-5500 in Toronto, or toll free in the rest of North America at
1-800-387-0825.




If you wish to participate in this Plan, please complete this form and mail it or send it by
facsimile to CIBC Mellon Trust Company, as follows:




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By Mail: 
	 	CIBC Mellon Trust Company	 	By Fax: 	 	CIBC Mellon Trust Company
	 
	 	P.O. Box 7010	 	 	 	Investor Line
	 
	 	Adelaide Street Postal Station	 	 	 	416-643-5501
	 
	 	Toronto, ON M5C 2W9	 	 	 	 





Non-registered holders should contact their intermediaries to discuss enrollment in the Plan and
the administrative practices of that institution with regard to participation in the Plan.