alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

________________ _________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. SERGIO RESENDIZ-OLGUIN, a/k/a Gerardo Rangel Torres, Defendant - Appellant. No. 23-6072 (D.C. No. 5:22- CR-00294-G-1) (W.D. Okla.)

________________ _________________ ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

________________ _________________ Before HARTZ , MATHESON , and CARSON , Circuit Judges.

________________ _________________ Sergio Resendiz-Olguin has filed an a ppeal in this criminal case. The government moves to enforce the app eal waiver in his plea agreement. See United
States v. Hahn , 359 F.3d 1315, 1328 (10th Cir. 2004) (en banc) (per curiam). Mr. Resendiz-Olguin has responded, through co unsel, informing us that he does not object to the government’s motion. Ba sed on the parties’ positions and our independent review of the record, we gran t the government’s motion and dismiss this appeal.
Entered for the Court Per Curiam

* This order and judgment is not bi nding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judica ta, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consiste nt with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### November 21, 2023 Christopher M. Wolpert Clerk of Court Appellate Case: 23-6072 Document: 010110956365 Date Filed: 11/21/2023 Page: 1
242.7503 Contract clause.       Use the clause at                 252.242-7006             , Accounting System Administration, in solicitations and contracts when contemplating—          (a)  A cost-reimbursement, incentive type, time-and-materials, or labor-hour contract; or          (b)  A contract with progress payments made on the basis of costs incurred by the contractor or on a percentage or stage of completion.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 242.75 - CONTRACTOR ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS AND RELATED CONTROLS
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CR. NO. 2:06cr169-WKW

)

DARNELL MONTREZE BROWN )

ORDER

Upon consideration of defendant attorney's renewed motion to withdraw (Doc. # 222),

filed April 30, 2007, and for good cause, it is

ORDERED that the motion be and hereby is set for hearing on May 9, 2007 at 9:00

a.m. in courtroom 5-B, Frank M. Johnson, Jr. United States Courthouse Complex, One

Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama. 

If the defendant is in custody, the United States Marshal or the person having custody

of the defendant shall produce the defendant for this proceeding. 

DONE, this 1st day of May, 2007.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 225 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 1 of 1
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2773 

To require the Federal Government to purchase fuel efficient automobiles, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 9, 2006 

Mrs. BOXER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To require the Federal Government to purchase fuel efficient 

automobiles, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Government Fleet Fuel 

5 Economy Act of 2006’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FEDERAL FLEET FUEL ECONOMY. 

7 Section 32917 of title 49, United States Code, is 

8 amended by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(a) NEW VEHICLES.— 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•S 2773 IS

1 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para2 graph (2), each passenger vehicle purchased, or 

3 leased for at least 60 consecutive days, by an execu4 tive agency after the date of the enactment of the 

5 Government Fleet Fuel Economy Act of 2006 shall 

6 be as fuel efficient as possible. 

7 ‘‘(2) WAIVER.—An executive agency may sub8 mit a written request to Congress for a waiver of the 

9 requirement under paragraph (1) in an emergency 

10 situation.’’. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
Exhibit








Addendum to Employment Contract
between
AXIS Re SE, Dublin, Zurich Branch
Brandschenkestrasse 90, 8002 Zurich
(hereinafter the "Employer”)
and
Jan Ekberg
[Address]
(hereinafter the "Employee")
(collectively the "Parties")
* * * * *
The Parties hereby conclude an Addendum to the Employment Contract, subject to the following terms and conditions and to the Swiss Code of Obligations:
1.    Effective Date


This Contract Addendum shall be effective as of  February 23, 2017 and for a temporary period of time lasting as long as your interim assignment as Chief Executive Officer of AXIS Re of AXIS Capital Holdings Limited ("AXIS").
2.    Compensation and Related Matter
As compensation for his services, the Employee will be provided with the following:
		
	a)
	Salary


The Employee's annual base salary will remain unchanged.
		
	b)
	Bonus Plan


A year-end bonus will be paid at the full discretion of the Employer. The bonus target is USD 1'000'000, based on company performance and individual performance. In order to be eligible for the bonus, the Employee must be on payroll on the day bonuses are paid. The bonus payment constitutes a special payment as defined in Art. 322d CO. The Employee does not have a right to receive any such additional payment and any payment made cannot be taken as a precedent for future or further payments.
		
	c)
	Annual Equity Grant


Your annual equity target for the 2017 performance year will be valued at USD 1'000'000. Our long-term equity plan is discretionary and awards are based on company and individual performance.
3.    Change in Job Title







The Employee is employed as Chief Executive Officer, AXIS Re of AXIS and will report directly to the Chief Executive Officer of the Parent, or any other individual as is mutually agreeable to you and the Employer.
All other terms and conditions of the Employment Contract will remain in force and unchanged. 




	
		
	Zurich
	AXIS Re SE, Dublin, Zurich Branch

	 
	 

	 
	 

	/s/ Jan Ekberg
	/s/ Victoria Westerberg

	Jan Ekberg
	VP, Senior HR Business Partner
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Election Assistance Commission

# AGENCY:

U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting agenda.

# Date and Time:

Friday, February 19, 2010, 10 a.m.-12 p.m. EDT.

# Place:

U.S. Election Assistance Commission, 1225 New York Ave., NW., Suite 150, Washington, DC 20005, (Metro Stop: Metro Center).

# Agenda:

The Commission will hold a public meeting to discuss draft Maintenance of Expenditure/Effort (MOE) Policy and consideration of posting draft MOE Policy for public comment. Commissioners will consider administrative matters. Members of the public may observe but not participate in EAC meetings unless this notice provides otherwise. Members of the public may use small electronic audio recording devices to record the proceedings. The use of other recording equipment and cameras requires advance notice to and coordination with the Commission's Communications Office.*

                        * View                         *EAC Regulations Implementing Government in the Sunshine Act.*

This meeting and hearing will be open to the public.

# Person to Contact for Information:

                        Bryan Whitener,                         *Telephone:*                         (202) 566-3100.                    

Donetta Davidson,

Chair, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

[FR Doc. 2010-3058 Filed 2-12-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6820-KF-P
#### § 756.4 Qualifying disaster event.

The OFF Program will provide assistance to eligible producers who suffered revenue losses due to the State of Florida and APHIS implemented quarantine that took place from August 28, 2015, through February 13, 2016, in Miami-Dade County, Florida.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

DAVID FINNEY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 3:06-cv-622-WKW

)

NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., et al., ) 

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Motion for Extension of Deadline to File Joint

Stipulation of Dismissal (Doc. # 70), it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. For

good cause shown, the deadline for filing the joint stipulation of dismissal is extended from

March 4, 2008 to March 14, 2008. 

DONE this 5th day of March, 2008.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 71 Filed 03/05/2008 Page 1 of 1
#### §§ 4279.191-4279.199 [Reserved]
#### Pauline L. Ray et al., Appellants, v. Crown Drug Stores, Inc., et al., Respondents.

In this action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the 'Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered May 9, 1969, which, at the close of plaintiffs’ case, dismissed the complaint. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Defendants Crown Drug Stores, Inc., and Crown Drug Stores Huntington, Inc., (Crown Drug) owned and operated a store in Huntington at the times mentioned in the complaint. In a well-lit vestibule of its store, defendant Crown Drug placed a coin-operated weighing scale for the use of its patrons. This scale was owned by defendant Klausner who had leased it to defendant Crown Drug. Plaintiff, Pauline L. Ray, was injured when she walked into the vestibule of Crown Drug and tripped over the platform of that scale. The evidence established that in walking through the vestibule plaintiff walked a few inches behind her daughter, following her path into the store. When plaintiff’s daughter stepped to the left to permit a patron of the store to proceed to exit from the store, plaintiff, looking straight ahead and following her daughter, also stepped aside, but plaintiff’s foot hit the platform of the scale. The scale was plainly visible; no part was hidden or obscured. It should have been seen by plaintiff if she had been reasonably alert to her surroundings in the vestibule. The placing by the defendant Crown Drug of the scale in the vestibule of its store at the place where plaintiff tripped over it did not involve an unreasonable risk to its customers. No negligence on its part, or on the part of defendant Klausner, the owner of the scale who had leased it to Crown Drug, had been established. (Cf. *Oldfield*v. *Neisner Bros.,*285 App. Div. 1110; *Greene*v. *Sibley, Lindsay & Curr Co.,*257 N. Y. 190; *Brodesky*v. *Kritzer,*192 N. Y. S. 2d 882, 885; *Burckhalter*v. *Woolworth Co.,*340 Pa. 300; *Engdal*v. *Owl Drug Co.,*183 Wash. 100; *Wurster*v. *Armstrong,*145 Pa. Super. Ct. 583; see, also, 61 ALR 2d 123, 132, 157.) In our view, *Denue*v. *Whelan Drug Stores*(266 N. Y. 477), relied on by plaintiffs is not applicable to the situation herein. In that case there *680was evidence that the back of the weighing machine was obscured by a radiator enclosure .which made the platform of the scale a hidden hazard. Martuseello, Acting P. J., Latham, Kleinfeld, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

HAROLD KELLY MURPHY, * 

 * 

 Plaintiff, * 

 * 

v. * Case No.: 3:06-cv-618-MEF 

 * 

SOUTHERN ENERGY HOMES, INC., * 

 * 

 Defendants. * 

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND PREVIOUSLY FILED AMENDED ANSWER

 Defendant, Southern Energy Homes, Inc. (“Southern Energy”), pursuant to Rule 15, 

F.R.C.P. and Local Rule 15.1, moves this Court to allow it to file the attached Amended Answer 

and, as grounds, therefore, states as follows: 

 1. On or about June 14, 2006, Harold Kelly Murphy (hereinafter referred to as 

“Plaintiff”) commenced the above-styled action against Southern Energy. 

 2. Southern Energy timely filed its answer. 

 3. Attached as Exhibit A hereto is Southern Energy’s proposed second amended 

answer. The second amended answer merely asserts one additional affirmative defense which is 

being asserted in light of Plaintiff’s responses to Defendant’s discovery. 

 4. Under Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “leave shall be freely 

given when justice so requires.” 

 5. In the case at bar, Southern Energy should be allowed to amend its answer to 

assert the additional defense. This case has only been pending since June 14, 2006 and the 

parties are early in the discovery process. At this time, the parties have merely exchanged initial 

disclosures and other paper discovery, and no depositions have been taken. 

Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 18 Filed 12/18/2006 Page 1 of 3
2

 6. Plaintiff has no objection to said Motion. 

 WHEREFORE, Southern Energy Homes, Inc. respectfully requests that this Court grant 

the instant Motion and allow it to amend its previously filed amended answer. 

Respectfully submitted, 

 /s Mitchel H. Boles 

 Robert D. Segall (ASB-7354-E68R) 

 Lee H. Copeland (ASB-3461-O72L) 

 Mitchel H. Boles (ASB-0813-S69M) 

 

 Copeland, Franco, Screws & Gill, P.A. 

444 South Perry Street 

P. O. Box 347 

Montgomery, AL 36101-0347

Phone: 334/834-1180 

Facsimile: 334/834-3172 

Email: segall@copelandfranco.com

Email: copeland@copelandfranco.com

Email: boles@copelandfranco.com

Attorney for Southern Energy Homes, Inc. 

Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 18 Filed 12/18/2006 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that on the 18th day of December, 2006, I electronically filed the 

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of 

such filing to the following: 

• Charles Lance Gould

lance.gould@beasleyallen.com holly.stroh@beasleyallen.com 

• Carter Gibson Vance

gibson.vance@beasleyallen.com heidi.bowers@beasleyallen.com 

/s Mitchel H. Boles 

Of Counsel 

Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 18 Filed 12/18/2006 Page 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE INCOME
STATEMENT BALANCE SHEET AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1996
<CASH>                                           2,066
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,128
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,666
<INVENTORY>                                     29,236
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                62,899
<PP&E>                                         114,740
<DEPRECIATION>                                  40,323
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 147,795
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,478
<BONDS>                                         36,738
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,349
<OTHER-SE>                                      77,790
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   147,795
<SALES>                                         63,638
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                63,638
<CGS>                                           44,433
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   44,433
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,816
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   569
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 503
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,317
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,338
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,979
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,979
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .28
        

</TABLE>
§ 707.5 Incompetency. ( a ) Where any person who would otherwise be eligible to receive a payment is adjudged incompetent by a court of competent jurisdiction before the payment is received, payment may be released in accordance with this section so long as, and only if, a timely and binding program application has been filed by the person involved while capable or by someone legally authorized to file an application for the person involved. Timeliness is determined under the relevant program regulations. In all cases, the payment application must have been timely under the relevant program regulations and all program conditions for payment must have been met by or on behalf of the person involved. However, the payment will not be made unless, in addition, a separate release application is filed in accordance with § 707.7. If these conditions are met, payment may be released without regard to the claims of creditors other than the United States, to the guardian or committee legally appointed for the person involved. In case no guardian or committee had been appointed, payment, if for not more than $1,000, may be released without regard to claims of creditors other than the United States, to one of the following in the following order for the benefit of the person who was the subject of the adjudication: ( 1 ) The spouse.
( 2 ) An adult son, daughter, or grandchild.
( 3 ) The mother or father.
( 4 ) An adult brother or sister.
( 5 ) Such person as may be authorized under State law to receive payment for the person (see standard procedure prescribed for the respective region).
( b ) In case payment is more than $1,000, payment may be released only to such person as may be authorized under State law to receive payment for the incompetent, so long as all conditions for other payments specified in paragraph (a) of this section and elsewhere in the applicable regulations have been met. Those requirements include the filing of a proper and timely and legally authorized program application by or for the person adjudged incompetent. The release of funds under this paragraph will be made without regard to claims of creditors other than the United States unless the agency determines otherwise.
[75 FR 81836, Dec. 30, 2010]
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

MATTHEW MARANA,

Petitioner,

vs. Case No.: 3:20cv5423/LAC/EMT

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT 

OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

_________________________/

ORDER

The chief magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on March 

2, 2021 (ECF No. 13). The parties were furnished a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, 

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the

timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the objections 

thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 

13) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 1) is DENIED.

Case 3:20-cv-05423-LC-EMT Document 15 Filed 03/16/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No.: 3:20cv5423/LAC/EMT

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

4. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this 

order and close the case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 16th day of March, 2021.

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

s/L.A. Collier 

Case 3:20-cv-05423-LC-EMT Document 15 Filed 03/16/21 Page 2 of 2
#### Marie S. Ryan, Respondent, v. Martin Ryan, Appellant.

Order entered April. 14, 1970, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, without costs and without disbursements, to reduce the amount of temporary alimony and support directed therein to $50 per week and counsel fee to $400, and otherwise affirmed. Though the matter was before the Conciliation Commissioner, it was proper for Special Term to make the order (see *Lebovics*v. *Lebovics,*34 A D 2d 783). Defendant-appellant’s financial circumstances do not justify the amounts awarded at Special Term. Concur — Capozzoli, J. P., McGivern, Markewich, Nunez and McNally, JJ.
#### § 701.25 Practices carried out with aid from ineligible persons or ineligible legal entities.

Any assistance provided by someone other than the eligible participant, including assistance from a State or Federal agency, shall be deducted from the participant's total costs incurred for the practice for the purpose of computing ECP or EFRP cost shares. If unusual conditions exist, the Deputy Administrator may waive deduction of such contributions upon a request from the State committee and demonstration of the need for such a waiver.

[69 FR 10302, Mar. 4, 2004, as amended at 75 FR 70088, Nov. 17, 2010]
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2818 

To reduce temporarily the duty on automatic shower cleaners. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 17, 2006 

Mr. KOHL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on automatic shower 

cleaners. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELECTRIC AUTOMATIC SHOWER CLEANERS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•S 2818 IS 

‘‘ 9902.98.08 Bath and shower cleaner 

electric device that dispenses 

a dilute solution of detergents and bleach alternative 

into a shower enclosure 

using a button activated, 

battery powered piston pump 

controlled by a microchip 

that automatically releases a 

measured amount of solution 

on demand (provided for in 

subheading 8509.80.00) ...... 2.1% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS