alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 15 Filed 08/31/2006 Page 1 of 1
§ 760.905 Eligible owners and contract growers. ( a ) To be considered eligible, a livestock owner must have had legal ownership of the eligible livestock, as provided in § 760.906(a), on the day the livestock died.
( b ) To be considered eligible, a contract grower on the day the livestock died must have had: ( 1 ) A written agreement with the owner of eligible livestock setting the specific terms, conditions, and obligations of the parties involved regarding the production of livestock; and
( 2 ) Control of the eligible livestock, as provided in § 760.906(b), on the day the livestock died.
#### William Roeber, Respondent, *v.*Peter Bowe, Sheriff, etc., Appellant.

(Argued April 22,1884;

decided May 6, 1884.)

*Samuel Greenba/um*for appellant.

*JEdwa/rd P. Wilder*for respondent.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
215.404-71 Weighted guidelines method.           **215.404-71-1 General****215.404-71-2 Performance risk.****215.404-71-3 Contract type risk and working capital adjustment.****215.404-71-4 Facilities capital employed.****215.404-71-5 Cost efficiency factor.****Parent topic:** 215.404 Proposal analysis.
PUBLIC LAW 107–284—NOV. 6, 2002 116 STAT. 2021

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5333:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 148 (2002):

Sept. 17, considered and passed House.

Oct. 17, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 107–284

107th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4 East

Central Street in Worcester, Massachusetts, as the ‘‘Joseph D. Early Post Office

Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

4 East Central Street in Worcester, Massachusetts, shall be known

and designated as the ‘‘Joseph D. Early Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Joseph

D. Early Post Office Building’’.

Approved November 6, 2002.

Nov. 6, 2002

[H.R. 5333]
**Exhibit 33.1**

** **

**WAMU ASSET ACCEPTANCE CORP.**

** **

**SERVICER’S REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

 

WaMu Asset Acceptance Corp. (the “Asserting Party”) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2006 and for theperiod from January 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006 (the “Reporting Period”) of the Platform Transactions (as defined below) with the servicing criterion set forth in Item 1122(d)(3)(i)(C) of Regulation AB (12 CFR part 229.1122(d)(3)(i)(C)) (the“Applicable Servicing Criterion”) and no others**.**  The transactions covered by this Servicer’s Assessment are those securitizations of pools of mortgage loans that were completed on or after January 1, 2006 and prior to January 1,2007 for which the Asserting Party performed servicing functions set forth in Item 1122(d) and that included one or more classes of publicly offered securities registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933(the “Platform Transactions”).

 

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criterion for the Reporting Period, using the Applicable ServicingCriterion, and has concluded that it has complied in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criterion with respect to the Mortgage Loans.

 

Deloitte & Touche LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the Asserting Party’s assessment ofcompliance with the Applicable Servicing Criterion for the Reporting Period.

 

Date:  February 22, 2007

 

  /s/ Thomas G. Lehmann_________Name:  Thomas G. LehmannTitle:    President
52.236-19 Organization and Direction of the Work.       As prescribed in 36.519, insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts when a cost-reimbursement construction contract is contemplated:          Organization and Direction of the Work (Apr 1984)                                       (a) 						            When this contract is executed, the Contractor shall submit to the Contracting Officer a chart showing the general executive and administrative organization, the personnel to be employed in connection with the work under this contract, and their respective duties. The Contractor shall keep the data furnished current by supplementing it as additional information becomes available.                                          (b) 						            Work performance under this contract shall be under the full-time resident direction of (1) the Contractor, if the Contractor is an individual; (2) one or more principal partners, if the Contractor is a partnership; or (3) one or more senior officers, if Contractor is a corporation, association, or similar legal entity. However, if the Contracting Officer approves, the Contractor may be represented in the direction of the work by a specific person or persons holding positions other than those identified in this paragraph.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.236 [Reserved]
BEFORE THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

MESA AIRLINES, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP09AL0011 

(Civil Penalty case) 

DMS F AA-2009-0972 

WITHDRAWAL OF COMPLAINT 

RECEIVED 

JUN 2 6 2013 

HEARING DOCKET 

The parties have settled this matter pursuant to section 502 of the Bankruptcy Code, and Rule 

9019(a) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure in the United States Bankruptcy Court 

Southern District ofNew York. (Case No. 10-10018(MG)). Therefore, the complaint filed in 

this matter on October 13, 2009, is hereby withdrawn. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Peter J. Lynch 

Assistant Chief Counsel 

By: A--~~n~·~in~g~ham~-----------------

Attomey, Enforcement Division/AGC-300 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Ave., SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

Telephone: (202) 267-7268 

Facsimile: (202) 267-5106 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify on this date I delivered in person the original and one copy of the Withdrawal of 

Complaint In the Matter of Mesa Airlines, Inc., FAA Docket No. CP9ALOOll (Civil Penalty 

case), DMS-2009-0972 addressed to: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Avenue, SW 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

In addition, I hereby certify that on this date I have sent via certified mail a copy of the 

Withdrawal of Complaint In the Matter of Mesa Airlines, Inc., FAA Docket No. CP9ALOO 11 

(Civil Penalty case), DMS FAA-2009-0972 addressed to: 

Christopher Pappaioanou 

Vice President, Legal Affairs 

Mesa Air Group 

410 N. 44th Street, Suite I 00 

Phoenix, AZ 85008 

Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

June 2(~013
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2966 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2966

  To suspend temporarily the duty on AC electric motors of an output 
                exceeding 74.6 W but not exceeding 85 W.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 23, 2006

  Mr. Frist (for himself and Mr. Alexander) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on AC electric motors of an output 
                exceeding 74.6 W but not exceeding 85 W.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AC ELECTRIC MOTORS OF AN OUTPUT EXCEEDING 74.6 W BUT NOT 
              EXCEEDING 85 W.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.85.06        AC electric motors of   Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           an output exceeding                                               31/2009          ''
                           74.6 W but not                                                                      .
                           exceeding 85 W,
                           single phase; each
                           equipped with a
                           capacitor, a speed
                           control mechanism, a
                           motor mount of
                           plastics and a self-
                           contained gear
                           mechanism for
                           oscillation (provided
                           for in subheading
                           8501.40.40)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# Subpart 249.1 - GENERAL PRINCIPLES

**Parent topic:**Part 249 - TERMINATION OF CONTRACTS

## 249.105 Duties of termination contracting officer after issuance of notice of termination.

### 249.105-1 Termination status reports.

Follow the procedures at PGI                 249.105-1              for reporting status of termination actions.

### 249.105-2 Release of excess funds.

See PGI                 249.105-2              for guidance on recommending the release of excess funds.  

## 249.109 Settlement agreements.

### 249.109-7 Settlement by determination.

Follow the procedures at PGI                 249.109-7              for settlement of a convenience termination by determination.

### 249.109-70 Limitation on pricing of the terminated effort.

When there is a termination for convenience (partial or whole) or a change that reduces scope, follow the procedures at PGI                 249.109-70              for limitation on pricing of the terminated or reduced effort.

## 249.110 Settlement negotiation memorandum.

Follow the procedures at PGI                 249.110              for preparation of a settlement negotiation memorandum.
§ 761.53 Interest bearing accounts. ( a ) A supervised bank account, if possible, will be established as an interest bearing deposit account provided that the funds will not be immediately disbursed, and the account is held jointly by the borrower and the Agency if this arrangement will benefit the borrower.
( b ) Interest earned on a supervised bank account will be treated as normal income security.
EX-34 (i)
(logo) ERNST & YOUNG

Ernst & Young LLP
Suite 2800
600 Peachtree Street
Atlanta Georgia 30308-2215

Phone: (404) 874-8300
www.ey.com

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on
Assessment of Compliance with Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB
Servicing Criteria, that ZC Sterling Insurance Agency, Inc. (the Company)
complied with certain servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the
Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the ZC Sterling
Integrated Product Solution (ZIPS) hazard insurance outsourcing Platform
(Platform) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006. The Company has
determined that only certain servicing criteria 1122 (d) 1(iv), 1122 (d) 2(vi),
1122 (d) 4(xi), 1122 (d) 4(xii), and 1122 (d) 4(xiii) are applicable to the
activities performed by them with respect to the Platform covered by this
report. The Company has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set
forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB
are not applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the
Platform covered by this report. See Appendix A of management's assertion for
the Platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the
Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with
the servicing criteria based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining,
on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than
all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether
the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing
criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the servicing activities
performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our
procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred
either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances
or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by
this report for the Platform. We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006
for the ZIPS Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ Ernst & Young

February 20, 2007


A Member Practice of Ernst & Young Global
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

DREAM DEFENDERS,

NEW FLORIDA MAJORITY,

ORGANIZE FLORIDA, and

FLORIDA IMMIGRANT

COALITION,

Plaintiffs,

v. CASE NO.: 4:20cv485-MW/MAF

RON DESANTIS, in his official

Capacity as Governor of the State 

of Florida, and LAUREL M. LEE,

in her official capacity as Florida

Secretary of State,

Defendants.

_________________________/

ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

The remaining plaintiffs have filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal1

dismissing this action without prejudice. ECF No. 38. Inasmuch as the defendants

have not filed an answer or motion for summary judgment, the Notice of Voluntary 

Dismissal is effective without an order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). The 

Clerk shall close the file.

SO ORDERED on October 13, 2020.

s/Mark E. Walker 

Chief United States District Judge

1 Dismissal is without prejudice unless Plaintiffs’ notice states otherwise. Fed. R. civ. P. 

41(a)(1)(B). 

Case 4:20-cv-00485-MW-MAF Document 39 Filed 10/13/20 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Synthesis
Energy Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 3) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017
(the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Delome Fair, President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Date: May 16, 2018



| | /s/ Delome Fair                                      | 
| | ---------------------------------------------------- | 
| | Delome Fair                                          | 
| | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, and | 
| | principal financial officer                          | 











10
#### § 789.70 Protection against claims.

A person will not be held liable for damages or penalties for any act or failure to act resulting directly or indirectly from compliance with any provision of this part, or an official action, even if such provision or action is subsequently declared invalid by judicial or other competent authority.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Video Display Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this quarterly report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in
the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during
the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the
registrants internal controls over
financial reporting.
 Date: January 12, 2007
    
    /s/ Ronald D. OrdwayRonald D. OrdwayChief Executive Officer
160 So.2d 596

#### Samuel Jessie JONES and Willie Mae Cravens Jones v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY OF CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, Halliburton Company and Meredith S. Hailey.

No. 47088.

Feb. 24, 1964.

Court of Appeal, Third Circuit.

159 So.2d 12.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
52.247-66 Returnable Cylinders.

As prescribed in 47.305-17 , insert the following clause:

Returnable Cylinders (May 1994)

(a) Cylinder, referred to in this clause, is a pressure vessel designed for pressures higher than 40

psia and having a circular cross section excluding a portable tank, multi-tank car tank, cargo tank or

tank car.

(b) Returnable cylinders shall remain the Contractor’s property but shall be loaned without charge

to the Government for a period of ____ days [Contracting Officer shall insert number of days]

(hereafter referred to as loan period) following the day of delivery to the f.o.b. point specified in the

contract. Any cylinder not returned within the loan period shall be charged a daily rental beginning

with the firstday after the loan period expires, to and including the day the cylinders are delivered to

the Contractor (if the original delivery was f.o.b. origin) or are delivered or made available for

delivery to the Contractor’s designated carrier (if the original delivery was f.o.b. destination). The

Government shall pay the Contractor a rental of $____________ [Contracting Officer shall insert dollar

amount for rental, after evaluation of offers] per cylinder, perday, computed separately for cylinders

by type, size, and capacity and for each point of delivery named in the contract. No rental shall

accrue to the Contractor in excess of replacement value per cylinder specified in paragraph (c) of

this clause.

(c) For each cylinder lost or damaged beyond repair while in the Government’s possession, the

Government shall pay to the Contractor the replacement value, less the allocable rental paid for that

cylinder as follows:

________________________________________________ ________________________________________________

________________________________________________ [Contracting Officer shall insert the cylinder types,

sizes, capacities, and associated replacement values.]

These cylinders shall become Government property.

(d) If any lost cylinder is located within ___________ [Contracting Officer shall insert number of days]

calendar days after payment by the Government, it may be returned to the Contractor by the

Government, and the Contractor shall pay to the Government an amount equal to the replacement

value, less rental computed in accordance with paragraph (b) of this clause, beginning at the

expiration of the loan period specified in paragraph (b) of this clause, and continuing to the date on

which the cylinder was delivered to the Contractor.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.247 [Reserved]