alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on [Subchapter A of Chapter VIII](/current/title-7/chapter-VIII/subchapter-A)

#### Authority:

[7 U.S.C. 71-87K](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/7/71), [1621-1627](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/7/1621).

###### Editorial Note on [Subchapter A of Chapter VIII](/current/title-7/chapter-VIII/subchapter-A)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at [84 FR 45645](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/84-FR-45645), Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 810.604 Grades and grade requirements for flaxseed.

| Grade | Minimum test weight per bushel (pounds) | Maximum limits of damaged kernels— | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Heat damaged kernels (percent) | Total (percent) |
| U.S. No. 1 | 49.0 | 0.2 | 10.0 |
| U.S. No. 2 | 47.0 | 0.5 | 15.0 |
| U.S. Sample grade— | | | |
| U.S. Sample grade is flaxseed that: | | | |
| (a) Does not meet the requirements for the grades U.S. Nos. 1 or 2; or | | | |
| (b) Contains 8 or more stones which have an aggregate weight in excess of 0.2 percent of the sample weight, 2 or more pieces of glass, 3 or more crotalaria seeds (*Crotalaria* spp.), 2 or more castor beans (*Ricinus communis* L.), 4 or more particles of an unknown foreign substance(s) or a commonly recognized harmful or toxic substance(s), 10 or more rodent pellets, bird dropping, or equivalent quantity of other animal filth per 11/8 to 11/4 quarts of flaxseed; or | | | |
| (c) Has musty, sour, or commercially objectionable foreign odor (except smut or garlic odor), or | | | |
| (d) Is heating or otherwise of distinctly low quality. | | | |
Subpart 5209.1 - RESPONSIBLE

PROSPECTIVE CONTRACTORS

Parent topic: Part 5209 - CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS

5209.104 Standards.

5209.104-1 General standards.

(g)(ii) Ownership or control by a foreign government when access to proscribed information is

required.

(C) Submit waiver requests for Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence approval via DASN(P) by

email at RDAJ&As.fct @navy.mil with the subject “[Activity Name] DFARS 209.104-1(g)(ii) - Waiver

Request/National Security Interest Determination.”

(D) Submit waiver requests for Secretary of Defense approval via DASN(P) by email at address

RDAJ&As.fct @navy.mil with the subject “[Activity Name] DFARS 209.104-1(g)(ii)(A) - SECDEF

Waiver Request.”

5209.104-5 Representation and certifications regarding responsibility

matters.

(a)(1) When provided an affirmative response from The Boeing Company (TBC) in paragraph (a)(1)

of the provision at 52.209-5, Certification Regarding Responsibility Matters, or paragraph (h) of the

provision at 52.212-3 Offeror Representations and Certification—Commercial Items, the contracting

officer shall request such additional information from TBC to determine if their affirmative response

is solely related to the Deferred Prosecution Agreement between TBC and the United States District

Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division, dated January 7, 2021.

(2) If it is determined that the affirmative response from TBC in (a)(1) is solely related to the

Deferred Prosecution Agreement between TBC and the United States District Court for the Northern

District of Texas, Fort Worth Division, dated January 7, 2021, notwithstanding FAR 9.104-5(a)(2),

contracting officers are not required to provide the notification to the Department of the Navy’s

Acquisition Integrity Office.

5209.104-6 Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System.

(c)(2) After completing the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS)

review required in FAR 9.104-6 prior to contract award and determining the potential awardee was

removed from the debarred or suspended list within the last two years, the contracting officer, if
choosing to continue with contract award, shall notify the HCA and the AGC(AI)). The AGC (AI) may

provide additional available relevant information regarding the prospective awardee to assist the

HCA in making and supporting the decision to award. The HCA shall approve the contract award.
Page Thirty-Three





Exhibit 32.1





Statement of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Highlands Bankshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, as the chief executive
officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.














/s/ C.E. PorterC.E. PorterChief Executive OfficerNovember 13, 2009
#### § 923.25 Acceptance.

Any person prior to selection as a member or an alternate member of the committee shall qualify by filing with USDA a written acceptance of willingness to serve on the committee.

[66 FR 58356, Nov. 21, 2001]
§ 632.41 Violations. ( a ) *Actions causing violation.* The following actions constitute violation of a contract by a land user: ( 1 ) Knowingly or negligently damaging or causing conservation treatment to be impaired.
( 2 ) Adopting land use or treatment that tends to defeat the program purposes during the period of the contract.
( 3 ) Failing to comply with the terms of the contract.
( 4 ) Filing a false claim.
( 5 ) Misusing an authorization.
( b ) *Effect of violation* — ( 1 ) *Contract to be terminated.* ( i ) By signing a contract, the land user agrees to forfeit all rights to further cost-share payments under a contract and to refund cost-share payments received not to exceed the difference between the estimated value of the land at time of entering into the contract and the value at time of termination, if the contracting officer, with approval of the State conservationist, determines that: ( A ) There was a violation of the contract during the time the land user had control of the land, and
( B ) The violation was of a nature as to warrant termination of the contract.
( ii ) The land user is to be obligated to refund cost-share payments and cost shares paid under authorizations not to exceed the difference between the estimated value of the land at time of entering into the contract and the value at time of termination.
( 2 ) *Contract not terminated.* ( i ) By signing a contract, the land user agrees to refund cost-share payments received under the contract or to accept payment adjustment if the contracting officer, with the approval of the State conservationist, determines that: ( A ) There was a violation of the contract during the time the land user had control of the land, and
( B ) The nature of the violation does not warrant termination of the contract.
( ii ) Payment adjustments may include decreasing the rate of a cost share, deleting a cost-share commitment from the contract, or withholding cost-share payments earned but not paid. The land user who signs the contract may be obligated to refund cost-share payments and cost shares paid under authorizations.
#### § 905.82 Effective time.

The provisions of this subpart shall become effective on and after 12:01 a.m., Eastern Standard Time, September 1, 1946, and shall continue in force until terminated in one of the ways specified in § 905.83.

[22 FR 10734, Dec. 27, 1957. Redesignated at 26 FR 12751, Dec. 30, 1961, as amended at 88 FR 82232, Nov. 24, 2023]
**Exhibit No. 32.1**Form 10-K        BTHC VIII, Inc.        File No. 000-52232

     **Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted             Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of BTHC VIII, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Timothy P. Halter, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as        adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

     (1)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| Date: January 21, 2009 |   |   | By: Timothy P. Halter   |   |   |
|------------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|--------|
|                        |   |   | Timothy P. Halter       |   |   |
|                        |   |   | Chief Executive and     |   |   |
|                        |   |   | Chief Financial Officer |   |   |

 

 

 

----

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to BTHC VIII, Inc. and will be retained by BTHC VIII, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 21 Filed 10/20/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 21 Filed 10/20/2006 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 21-2 Filed 10/20/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 21-2 Filed 10/20/2006 Page 2 of 2
§ 9.301 Applicability and administration. ( a ) This subpart specifies the eligibility requirements and payment calculations for the Pandemic Assistance Revenue Program (PARP). FSA is administering PARP to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic by providing support for eligible producers of agricultural commodities who suffered an eligible revenue loss in calendar year 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. To be eligible for PARP payments, participants must comply with all provisions under this subpart.
( b ) PARP is administered under the general supervision and direction of the Administrator, Farm Service Agency (FSA).
( c ) The FSA State committee will take any action required by this subpart that an FSA county committee has not taken. The FSA State committee will also: ( 1 ) Correct, or require an FSA county committee to correct, any action taken by such county FSA committee that is not in accordance with the regulations of this subpart; or
( 2 ) Require an FSA county committee to withhold taking any action that is not in accordance with this subpart.
( d ) No provision or delegation to an FSA State or county committee will preclude the FSA Administrator, the Deputy Administrator, or a designee or other such person, from determining any question arising under the programs of this subpart, or from reversing or modifying any determination made by an FSA State or county committee.
( e ) The Deputy Administrator has the authority to permit State and county committees to waive or modify deadlines (except deadlines specified in a law) and other requirements or program provisions not specified in law, in cases where lateness or failure to meet such other requirements or program provisions do not adversely affect operation of PARP.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

§ 810.302 Definitions of other terms. ( a ) *Conspicuous Admixture.* All matter other than canola, including but not limited to ergot, sclerotinia, and stones, which is conspicuous and readily distinguishable from canola and which remains in the sample after the removal of machine separated dockage. Conspicuous admixture is added to machine separated dockage in the computation of total dockage.
( b ) *Damaged kernels.* Canola and pieces of canola that are heat-damaged, sprout-damaged, mold-damaged, distinctly green damaged, frost damaged, rimed damaged, or otherwise materially damaged.
( c ) *Distinctly green kernels.* Canola and pieces of canola which, after being crushed, exhibit a distinctly green color.
( d ) *Dockage.* All matter other than canola that can be removed from the original sample by use of an approved device according to procedures prescribed in FGIS instructions. Also, underdeveloped, shriveled, and small pieces of canola kernels that cannot be recovered by properly rescreening or recleaning. Machine separated dockage is added to conspicuous admixture in the computation of total dockage.
( e ) *Ergot.* Sclerotia (sclerotium, sing.) of the fungus, *Claviceps* species, which are associated with some seeds other than canola where the fungal organism has replaced the seed.
( f ) *Heat-damaged kernels.* Canola and pieces of canola which, after being crushed, exhibit that they are discolored and damaged by heat.
( g ) *Inconspicuous admixture.* Any seed which is difficult to distinguish from canola. This includes, but is not limited to, common wild mustard (*Brassica kaber* and *B. juncea*), domestic brown mustard (*Brassica juncea*), yellow mustard (*B. hirta*), and seed other than the mustard group.
( h ) *Sclerotia (Sclerotium, sing.* ). Dark colored or black resting bodies of the fungi *Sclerotinia* and *Claviceps.*
( i ) *Sclerotinia.* Genus name which includes the fungus *Sclerotinia sclerotiorum* which produces sclerotia. Canola is only infrequently infected, and the sclerotia, unlike sclerotia of ergot, are usually associated within the stem of the plants.
# L_2015058EN.01008601.xml

| 3.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 58/86 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 58/86

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision 2014/401/CFSP of 26 June 2014 on the European Union Satellite Centre and repealing Joint Action 2001/555/CFSP on the establishment of a European Union Satellite Centre

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 188 of 27 June 2014
  )

On page 78, Article 13(1):

for:

‘... of 15 October 2011 ...’,

read:

‘... of 15 October 2001 ...’.

---
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

§ 868.23 Dismissal of request for inspection service. ( a ) *Conditions for dismissal* — ( 1 ) *General.* A cooperator or the Service shall dismiss requests for inspection service when: ( i ) Performing the requested service is not practicable or possible.
( ii ) The cooperator or the Service lacks authority under the Act or regulations to provide the inspection service requested or is unable to comply with the Act, regulations, standards, or instructions.
( iii ) Sufficient information is not available to make an accurate determination.
( 2 ) *Original inspection service.* A request for original inspection service shall be dismissed if an original inspection has already been performed and circumstances do not prevent a retest inspection, appeal inspection, or Board appeal inspection from being performed on the same lot.
( 3 ) *Retest inspection service.* A request for a retest inspection service shall be dismissed by official personnel when: ( i ) The factor requested was not tested during the original inspection;
( ii ) The condition of the commodity has undergone a material change;
( iii ) A representative file sample is not available;
( iv ) The applicant requests that a new sample be obtained;
( v ) The request is for a graded commodity; or
( vi ) The reasons for the retest inspection are frivolous.
( 4 ) *Appeal inspection service.* A request for an appeal inspection service shall be dismissed by official personnel when: ( i ) The scope is different from the scope of the original inspection service;
( ii ) The condition of the commodity has undergone a material change;
( iii ) The request specifies a file sample and a representative file sample is not available;
( iv ) The applicant requests that a new sample be obtained and a new sample cannot be obtained; or
( v ) The reasons for the appeal inspection are frivolous.
( 5 ) *Board appeal inspection service.* A request for a Board appeal inspection service shall be dismissed by official personnel when: ( i ) The scope is different from the scope of the original inspection service;
( ii ) The condition of the commodity has undergone a material change;
( iii ) A representative file sample is not available;
( iv ) The applicant requests that a new sample be obtained; or
( v ) The reasons for the Board appeal inspection are frivolous.
( b ) *Procedure for dismissal.* The cooperator or the Service shall notify the applicant of the proposed dismissal of service. If correctable, the applicant will be afforded reasonable time to take. corrective action or to demonstrate there is no basis for the dismissal. If corrective action has not been adequate, the applicant will be notified of the decision to dismiss the request for service, and any results of service shall not be released.
## Draft Proposal CB-37

This concept has been developed by the DOE Building Energy Codes Program (BECP) as a possible code

change proposal to the Commercial provisions of the 2012 International Energy Conservation Code

(IECC). Interested parties are asked to submit any and all comments on DOE's initial concepts and draft

code change proposals. For instructions on submitting comments, visit:

www.energycodes.gov/development/ commercial/codes/iecc/concepts/



## Exterior Lighting Zones (CB-37)

Objective: Clarify the exterior lighting zone requirements to indicate that Zone 3 includes all areas that

are not classified as lighting Zone 1, 2, or 4.

Suggested Code Change Proposal

Revise Table C405.6.2(1) row for lighting zone 3 as follows:

All other areas not classified as lighting zone 1, 2 or 4.

Reason: Clarification. It is not totally clear what “other areas” refers to. This makes it crystal clear.

Cost Impact: There is no cost impact associated with this proposed change.
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 289

AN ACT

To authorize an annual appropriation of $10,000,000 for

mental health courts through fiscal year 2011.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

S 289 ES

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

2 Section 1001(a)(20) of title I of the Omnibus Crime

3 Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C.

4 3793(a)(20)) is amended by striking ‘‘fiscal years 2001

5 through 2004’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal years 2006 through

6 2011’’.

Passed the Senate April 18, 2005.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 289

AN ACT

To authorize an annual appropriation of

fiscal year 2011.$10,000,000 for mental health courts through
#### § 905.35 Right of the Secretary.

The members of the committee (including successors and alternates), and any agent or employee appointed or employed by the committee, shall be subject to removal or suspension by the Secretary at any time. Each and every order, regulation, decision, determination, or other act of the committee shall be subject to the continuing right of the Secretary to disapprove of the same at any time and upon his disapproval shall be deemed null and void, except as to acts done in reliance thereon or in compliance therewith.

[22 FR 10734, Dec. 27, 1957. Redesignated at 26 FR 12751, Dec. 30, 1961, as amended at 42 FR 59370, Nov. 17, 1977]
Subpart 5144.3 - Contractors Purchasing

System Reviews

Parent topic: Part 5144 - Subcontracting Policies and Procedures

5144.302 Requirements.

(a) The Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology), on a non-delegable

basis, may raise or lower the $50 million review level for contracts administered by the Army, if it is

considered to be in the Government’s best interest.
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.56
            
CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT WERE OMITTED AND REPLACED WITH “[***]”. A COMPLETE VERSION OF THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECRETARY OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO AN APPLICATION REQUESTING CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 24B-2 PROMULGATED UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED.







SECOND AMENDMENT TO DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT


This Second Amendment to the Distribution Agreement ("Second Amendment") is between Vericel Corporation ("Vericel") and Orsini Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. (“Orsini"). This Second Amendment is effective as of October 13, 2017 ("Effective Date").


Whereas, Vericel and Orsini are parties to a Distribution Agreement dated May 15, 2017 (the "Distribution Agreement"), under which Vericel appointed Orsini as a specialty pharmacy distributor for Carticel® and MACI®;


Whereas, the Parties desire to modify the payment terms of the Distribution Agreement;


Whereas, the Parties now wish to update the Distribution Agreement to reflect these changes;


Therefore, the Parties agree to amend the Distribution Agreement as follows:


		
	1.
	Exhibit A. The first paragraph under Payment Terms shall be deleted and replaced with the following:




Beginning January 1, 2018, for all Product invoiced by Vericel, Orsini shall pay Vericel in full, including payment of applicable Taxes, at the [***] for Product ordered by Orsini. Full payment is due from Orsini [***] days from the invoice. If Orsini makes full payment within [***] days from the date of invoice from Vericel, Orsini shall be entitled to a [***] reduction of the invoiced amount.


Orsini shall pay all invoices dated before August 20, 2017 pursuant to the invoice’s due date.


Notwithstanding the foregoing, for all invoices dated between August 20, 2017 and September 30, 2017, the Parties agree that the payment from Orsini is due to Vericel [***] days from the invoice date.


		
	2.
	No Other Changes. Except as provided in this Amendment, the terms and conditions of the Distribution Agreement will continue in full force.






IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties executed this Second Amendment as of its Effective Date.


Vericel Corporation                    Orsini Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.




By: /s/ Daniel Orlando                              By:  /s/ Michael Fieri                  
Name:  Daniel Orlando                    Name:   Michael Fieri
Title:    Chief Operating Officer                Title:    President and CEO


Date:  10.13.2017                                         Date:  10.13.2017
Subpart 5116.1 - Selecting Contract Types

Parent topic: Part 5116 - Types of Contracts

5116.102-90 Policies.

Contracting officers must document the rationale for selection of the contract type, to include

consideration of the associated risks, in the contract file. The supporting documentation may be

located in the contract type justification, a separate determination and findings, memorandum for

record, or other appropriate document.

Follow the procedures at AFARS PGI 5116.102-90-1 for selecting contract type.

See AFARS PGI 5116.102-90-2 for guidance on using the Virtual Pricing website.

5116.103 Negotiating contract type.

(c) Contracting officers should actively communicate and coordinate with their requiring activities to

identify opportunities to transition away from cost-reimbursement contracts, when possible and in

the best interest of the Government.

(d)(1) In addition to the items at FAR 16.103(d)(1), discuss how the profit arrangement motivates the

contractor to control costs and meet performance requirements.