alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 764.451 Purpose. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 65041 , Aug. 8, 2024.
The purpose of production and financial management training is to help an applicant develop and improve skills necessary to: ( a ) Successfully operate a farm;
( b ) Build equity in the operation; and
( c ) Become financially successful and prepared to graduate from Agency financing to commercial sources of credit.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 2:06-cr-169-WKW

 )

WILMONT TIMOTHY BARNETT )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the government's motion for release of prisoner filed on March 29,

2007, and for good cause, it is ORDERED that the motion be and hereby is GRANTED.

It is hereby ORDERED that the United States Marshals Service release custody of Wilmont

Timothy Barnett, to Todd Mims, DEA, on March 30, 2007, through June 30, 2007, so that said agent

can take such prisoner into custody without the necessity of the presence of a Deputy United States

Marshal.

It is further ORDERED that Todd Mims, DEA, return said prisoner into the custody of the

United States Marshals Service when he has finished with him.

Done, this 29th day of March, 2007.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 165 Filed 03/29/2007 Page 1 of 1
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2013-0089

 Directorate Identifier: 2012NM166AD

747-24A2360 --- 1/18/12

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
#### § 51.1912 Badly misshapen.

*Badly misshapen* means that the tomato is so badly deformed that its appearance is seriously affected.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3039 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3039

             To suspend temporarily the duty on Cohedur RL.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

  Mr. Graham introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To suspend temporarily the duty on Cohedur RL.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COHEDUR RL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.11.63        Mixtures of resorcinal  Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           (CAS No. 108-46-3),                                               31/2009          ''
                           hexamethylolmelamine                                                                .
                           ether (CAS No. 3089-
                           11-0), and dibutyl
                           phthalate (CAS No. 84-
                           74-2) (provided for
                           in subheading
                           3824.90.28)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2519 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2519

            To suspend temporarily the duty on Spiromesifen.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 5, 2006

  Mr. Talent introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To suspend temporarily the duty on Spiromesifen.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SPIROMESIFEN.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.10.71      3,3-                Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         Dimethylbutanoic                                                   31/2009
                         acid, 2-oxo-3-
                         (2,4,6-
                         trimethylphenyl)-
                         1-
                         oxaspiro[4.4]non-
                         3-en-yl ester
                         (CAS 283594-90-1)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2932.29.10)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-18-00582-CR

Joseph Anthony MENDOZA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR12469A

Honorable Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED October 31, 2018.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

§ 800.172 Applications for licenses. ( a ) *General.* An application for a license, the renewal of a license, or the return of a suspended license shall be made to the Service on forms furnished by the Service. Each application shall ( 1 ) be in English,
( 2 ) be typewritten or legibly written in ink,
( 3 ) show all information prescribed by the application form, and
( 4 ) be signed by the applicant.
( b ) *Additional information.* An applicant shall furnish any additional information considered necessary by the Service for consideration of an application.
( c ) *Withdrawal.* An application for a license may be withdrawn by an applicant at any time.
( d ) *Review of applications* — ( 1 ) *General procedure.* Each application shall be reviewed to determine whether the applicant and the application comply with the Act and the regulations.
( 2 ) *Application and applicant in compliance.* If it is determined that the applicant and the application comply with the Act and the regulations, the requested license shall be granted.
( 3 ) *Application not in compliance.* If an application does not comply with this section and the noncompliance prevents a satisfactory review by the Service, the applicant shall be provided an opportunity to submit any needed information. If the needed information is not submitted by the applicant within a reasonable time, the application may be dismissed.
( 4 ) *Applicant not in compliance.* If it is determined that an applicant does not comply with the provisions of the Act and §§ 800.171, 800.173, and 800.187 at the time the application is submitted, the applicant shall be provided an opportunity to comply. If the applicant cannot comply within a reasonable period of time, the application shall be dismissed.
( e ) *Procedure for dismissal.* If a dismissal involves an application for a renewal of a license or for the return of a suspended license, the dismissal shall be performed in accordance with the provisions of § 800.179. All other dismissals shall be performed by promptly notifying the applicant and the employer of the applicant of the reasons for the dismissal.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0580-0012) [45 FR 15810, Mar. 11, 1980, as amended at 48 FR 44453, Sept. 29, 1983; 54 FR 5924, Feb. 7, 1989]
1 Date: August 13, 2010 Subject: Minutes of the August 12, 2010 Conference Call with Representative from Barrick Gold Corporation EPA Contract No. EP

- D

- 06

- 118; EPA Work Assignment No. 4

- 06 RTI Project No. 0210426.004.006

From: Chuck French OAQPS/SPPD/MMG (D243

- 02) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

To: Docket ID No. EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2010

- 0239

I

. Introduction

A conference call with a representative for Barrick Gold Corporation w as held o n August 12 , 20 10 . The purpose of the meeting was to discuss testing and parametric monitoring for roasters

. This memorandum summarizes the major topics discussed during the meeting

.

II

. Attendees

Kevin Lewis , Air Sciences Inc.

Chuck French, U.S. EPA, OAQPS

Marvin Branscome, RTI Intern ational Gabrielle Raymond, RTI International

III

. Discussion
The major topics discussed during the meeting included important parameters to measure for calomel scrubbers, ways to establish parametric limits , and using Method 30B for monitoring

.
**Annual
      Statement of Compliance**





VIA:
      EMAIL





Structured
      Asset Securities Corporation II


745
      Seventh Avenue


New
      York,
      NewYork 10019








Re:
      The
      Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of September 11, 2006 (the
“Agreement”), between Structured Asset Securities Corporation II as depositor
      (the “Depositor”), LaSalle Bank National Association as trustee (the “Trustee”),
      Wachovia Bank, National Association as master servicer (the “Master Servicer”)
      and LNR Partners, Inc. as special servicer (the “Special Servicer”), relating to
      LB-UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,
      Series 2006-C6.





I,
      Barbara L. Marik, a First Vice President of LaSalle Bank National Association,
      as Trustee hereby certify that:





(1)
      A
      review of the activities of the Trustee during the preceding calendar year
      and
      of the performance of the Trustee under the Agreement has been made under my
      supervision; and





(2)
      To
      the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled all
      its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such
      year or a portion thereof.











Date: February
      1, 2007





LaSalle
      Bank National Association, as Trustee








/s/
      Barbara L Marik


Barbara
      L. Marik


First
      Vice President
----

|   | (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q      of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange      Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));  and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition      and results of operations of theCompany. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:      May 14, 2008 |   | /s/      WILLIAM J. GERVAIS |
|--------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                     |   | William J. Gervais          |
|                     |   | Principal      Executive Officer      |

----
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Patrick Corson, Appellant, v. James J. Morrow, as Director of Woodbourne Rehabilitation Center, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, without costs, on the authority of *People ex rel. Zervoulakos*v. *Morrow*(34 A D 2d 695). No opinion. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., Greenblott and Sweeney, JJ., concur.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2690 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

8801 Sudley Road in Manassas, Virginia, as the ‘‘Harry J. Parrish 

Post Office’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 2, 2006 

Mr. ALLEN (for himself and Mr. WARNER) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 8801 Sudley Road in Manassas, Virginia, as 

the ‘‘Harry J. Parrish Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HARRY J. PARRISH POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 8801 Sudley Road, Manassas, 

6 Virginia, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Harry 

7 J. Parrish Post Office’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 2690 IS

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the Harry J. Parrish Post 

3 Office. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) 2:06cr169-WKW

) 

DARNELL MONTREZE BROWN )

ORDER

Upon consideration of defendant's motion to have defendant present at the pretrial

conference (Doc. # 321), filed September 25, 2007, and for good cause, it is

ORDERED that the motion be and hereby is GRANTED. The United States Marshal is

DIRECTED to produce the defendant for the pretrial conference September 28, 2007 at 3:00 p.m.

in courtroom 5-B.

DONE, this 25th day of October, 2007.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 328 Filed 09/25/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### §§ 765.104-765.150 [Reserved]
33.105 Protest at the U.S. Court of Federal

Claims.

Procedures for protests at the U.S. Court of Federal Claims are set forth in the rules of the U.S.

Court of Federal Claims. The rules may be found at http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/rules-and-forms.

Parent topic: Subpart 33.1 - Protests
#### § 633.14 Debt collection.

Any debts arising under this program are governed with respect to their collection by the Federal Claims Collection Act of 1966 (31 U.S.C. 3701) and the regulations found in 4 CFR chapter II.
MINUTES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION

HON. MARK E. FULLER, PRESIDING AT MONTGOMERY, AL

DATE COMMENCED: 9/5/06 AT: 3:40 p.m. 

DATE COMPLETED: 9/5/06 AT: 4:25 p.m.

WAYNE BLACK §

§

vs. § CV. NO. 1:03CV734-MEF

§

LAMAR GLOVER, ET AL. §

_____________________________________________________________________________

PLAINTIFF APPEARANCES: DEFENDANT

Wayne Black, Pro Se Gary C. Sherrer

______________________________________________________________________________

COURT OFFICIALS PRESENT:

Jimmy Dickens, Court Reporter

Barbara Wells, Law Clerk

Kelli Gregg, Courtroom Clerk

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

COURTROOM PROCEEDINGS:

( X) Pretrial Conference

3:40 p.m. - Court convenes.

Court discusses claim that is remaining in case with parties.

Plaintiff states the reasons for filing his complaint and the injuries that he

sustained.

Defense counsel discusses issues relating to the plaintiff’s injuries.

This will be the first case to be tried in the October 2, 2006 trial term in

Dothan.

The Court asks that defense counsel get with the plaintiff and help him

with finding addresses for his witnesses for trial. Also, parties are to get

together and try to work out some stipulations.

Defense counsel thinks that trial will last 1-2 days not including jury

selection.

4:25 p.m. - Court is in recess.

Case 1:03-cv-00734-MEF-SRW Document 24 Filed 09/05/2006 Page 1 of 1
52.247-54 [Reserved]

Parent topic: 52.247 [Reserved]
AFS-12-513-E October 12, 2012

Exemption No. 8838C Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2006-26747

Mr. David L. Jones Corporate Aviation Education Director

Aviation Institute of Maintenance

4455 South Boulevard Virginia Beach, VA 23452-1159

Dear Mr. Jones:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 8838, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated August 22, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Adm inistration (FAA) on behalf of Technical Education Services, Inc., d.b.a. Aviation Institute of Maintenance (AIM) (operating under Air Agency Certificat e AR9T018R) for an extension of Exemption No. 8838, as amended. That exemption from § 65.75(a) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows AIM to administer the aviation mechanic general written test to students immediately following their successful completion of the general curriculum but before they meet the experience requirements of § 65.77.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to AIM.

Our Decision

The FAA has determ ined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 8838, as amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore,2

under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. §§ 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the term ination date of Exemption No. 8838, as amended, to February 28, 2015, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 8838, as amended, remain the same. This letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 8838.

Sincerely,

/s/ Raymond Towles Acting Director, Flight Standards

Service
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





I,
William J. Gervais, Chief Executive Officer of Qualstar Corporation (the
“Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1) the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March
31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      May 12, 2009
              /s/ WILLIAM J. GERVAISWilliam
      J. GervaisPrincipal
      Executive Officer
Case 1:03-cv-00734-MEF-SRW Document 48 Filed 10/13/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:03-cv-00734-MEF-SRW Document 48 Filed 10/13/2006 Page 2 of 2
243.205-72 Unpriced change orders.

See the clause prescriptions at 217.7406 for all unpriced change orders with an estimated value

exceeding $5 million.

Parent topic: 243.205 Contract clauses.
§ 780.7 Reconsideration. ( a ) A request for reconsideration must be submitted in writing by a participant or by a participant's authorized representative and addressed to the FSA decision maker as will be instructed in the adverse decision notification.
( b ) A participant's right to request reconsideration is waived if, before requesting reconsideration, a participant: ( 1 ) Has requested and begun mediation of the adverse decision;
( 2 ) Has appealed the adverse decision to a higher reviewing authority in FSA; or
( 3 ) Has appealed to NAD.
( c ) Provided a participant has not waived the right to request reconsideration, FSA will consider a request for reconsideration of an adverse decision under these rules except when a request concerns a determination of NRCS appealable under the procedures in § 780.11, the decision has been mediated, the decision has previously been reconsidered, or the decision-maker is the Administrator, Deputy Administrator, or other FSA official outside FSA's informal appeals process.
( d ) A request for reconsideration will be deemed withdrawn if a participant requests mediation or appeals to a higher reviewing authority within FSA or requests an appeal by NAD before a request for reconsideration has been acted upon.
( e ) The Federal Rules of Evidence do not apply to reconsiderations. Proceedings may be confined to presentations of evidence to material facts, and evidence or questions that are irrelevant, unduly repetitious, or otherwise inappropriate may be excluded.
( f ) The official decision on reconsideration will be the decision letter that is issued following disposition of the reconsideration request.
( g ) A decision on reconsideration is a new decision that restarts applicable time limitations periods under § 780.15 and part 11 of this title.
[70 FR 43266, July 27, 2005, as amended at 71 FR 30573, May 30, 2006]
52.247-50 No Evaluation of Transportation Costs.       As prescribed in 47.305-5(c)(1), insert the following provision in solicitations when exact destinations are not known and it is impractical to establish tentative or general delivery places for the purpose of evaluating transportation costs:          No Evaluation of Transportation Costs (Apr 1984)          Costs of transporting supplies to be delivered under this contract will not be an evaluation factor for award.          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.247 [Reserved]
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 2 Filed 07/14/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00618-MEF-SRW Document 2 Filed 07/14/2006 Page 2 of 2
#### Joanna Heller, Respondent, v. Richard F. Heller, Appellant.

Order entered January 21, 1969, modified on the facts and the law by striking therefrom the provision granting plaintiff wife permission to apply for additional counsel fees at the trial of this separation action and otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements. We deem the allowance granted by Special Term to be adequate under the circumstances of this case. Concur—Capozzoli, J. P., McGivem, Nunez, Steuer and Bastow, JJ.
#### § 795.10 Club, society, fraternal or religious organization.

Each individual club, society, fraternal or religious organization may be considered as a separate person to the extent that each such club, society, fraternal or religious organization is engaged in the production of crops as a separate producer and otherwise meets the requirements of § 795.3.