alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
To whom it may concern:

I would like to petition for an exemption so I can fly my 

drone commercially. I have a 1st generation Phantom 

made by DJI. It is a small quadcopter that uses a go pro 

camera to take video footage or pictures. I maintain my 

UAV by keeping software to date and running self tests to 

confirm I am always in control of the UAV at all times. I 

make sure the motors are balanced as well as the props. 

Before take off I confirm that I have a blinking green light 

which means my GPS is completely functioning and gives 

the best chance of no malfunctions. I also do not fly the 

UAV in wind over 12 mph so that it does not lose control 

for any reason. I have no formal training on flying the UAV 

but have had it several years and know how to fly it. 

When I was learning to fly I would make sure I was in an 

open field with no one around so any malfunctions would 

only effect my pocket book. I have been flying my 

phantom for two years or more and never have had any 

issues and would like to carry this into my business. I 

purchased this for commercial use but have refrained on 

the fact that regulation and licensing has been a huge 

issue for some time now. I would like the exemption so I 

can fly it for commercial use, meaning, flying my phantom 

to make income. I own a video production company and 

real estate photography businesses and would like to start 

incorporating it into my services. The demand for such 

technology is growing every day! My plans are to fly it in 

the state of Texas. I have clients from Austin to Dallas/Fort 

Worth and would like to be able to offer my services with 
the UAV to both places. I do not plan to fly it over 200 ft 

high or 200 ft away. I need close up shots of properties 

just from a little bit higher angle. I do not and will not fly 

near airports, exceed the 200 ft height limit, or fly it out of 

my site. I am heavily invested in my UAV and don’t want 

anything to happen to it so believe me when I tell you I 

don’t want it out of my line of site!!

Thank you,

Clinton B. Admire
252.247-7027 Riding Gang Member Requirements.       As prescribed in                 247.574             (e), use the following clause:          RIDING GANG MEMBER REQUIREMENTS (MAY 2018)          (a)  Definition.  “Riding gang member,” as used in this clause, has the same definition as “riding gang member” in title 46 U.S.C. 2101.          (b)  Requirements relating to riding gang members.  Notwithstanding 46 U.S.C. 8106, the Contractor shall ensure each riding gang member holds a valid U.S. Merchant Mariner's Document issued under 46 U.S.C. chapter 73, or a transportation security card issued under section 70105 of such title.          (c)  Exemption.          (1)  An individual is exempt from the requirements of paragraph (b) of this clause and shall not be treated as a riding gang member for the purposes of section 8106 of title 46, if that individual is on a vessel for purposes other than engaging in the operation or maintenance of the vessel and is—          (i)  One of the personnel who accompanies, supervises, guards, or maintains unit equipment aboard a ship, commonly referred to as supercargo personnel;          (ii)  One of the force protection personnel of the vessel;          (iii)  A specialized repair technician; or          (iv)  An individual who is otherwise required by the Secretary of Defense or designee to be aboard the vessel.          (2)  Any individual who is exempt under paragraph (c)(1) of this clause must pass a DoD background check before going aboard the vessel.          (i)  The Contractor shall—          (A)  Render all necessary assistance to U.S. Armed Forces personnel with respect to the identification and screening of exempted individuals.  This will require, at a minimum, the Contractor to submit the name and other biographical information necessary to the Government official specified in the contract for the purposes of conducting a background check; and          (B)  Deny access or immediately remove any individual(s) from the vessel deemed unsuitable for any reason by the Government agency conducting the background checks.  The Contractor agrees to replace any such individual promptly and require such replacements to fully comply with all screening requirements.          (ii)  The head of the contracting activity may waive this requirement if the individual possesses a valid U.S. Merchant Mariner's Document issued under 46 U.S.C., chapter 73, or a transportation security card issued under section 70105 of such title.          (3)  An individual exempted under paragraph (c)(1) of this clause is not treated as a riding gang member and shall not be counted as an individual in addition to the crew for the purposes of 46 U.S.C. 3304.          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 252.247 RESERVED
207.7003 Limitation.

For noncompetitive acquisitions, the acquisition of additional quantities is limited to not more than

10 percent of the quantity approved in the justification and approval prepared in accordance with

FAR Part 6 for the acquisition of the end item.

Parent topic: Subpart 207.70 - BUY-TO-BUDGET - ADDITIONAL QUANTITIES OF END ITEMS
# L_2014111EN.01004001.xml

| 15.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 111/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 111/40

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 383/2014

of 2 April 2014

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Beurre de Bresse (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, France's application to register the name ‘Beurre de Bresse’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, France's application to register the name ‘Beurre de Bresse’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Beurre de Bresse’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Beurre de Bresse’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 2 April 2014.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 335, 16.11.2013, p. 22.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.5. Oils and fats (butter, margarine, oils, etc.)

FRANCE

Beurre de Bresse (PDO)

---
237.102-71 Limitation on service contracts

for military flight simulators.

(a) Definitions. As used in this subsection—

(1) “Military flight simulator” means any system to simulate the form, fit, and function of a military

aircraft that has no commonly available commercial variant.

(2) “Service contract” means any contract entered into by DoD, the principal purpose of which is to

furnish services in the United States through the use of service employees as defined in 41 U.S.C.

6701.

(b) Under Section 832 of Pub. L. 109-364, as amended by Section 883(b) of Pub. L. 110-181, DoD is

prohibited from entering into a service contract to acquire a military flight simulator. However, the

Secretary of Defense may waive this prohibition with respect to a contract, if the Secretary—

(1) Determines that a waiver is in the national interest; and

(2) Provides an economic analysis to the congressional defense committees at least 30 days before

the waiver takes effect. This economic analysis shall include, at a minimum—

(i) A clear explanation of the need for the contract; and

(ii) An examination of at least two alternatives for fulfilling the requirements that the contract is

meant to fulfill, including the following with respect to each alternative:

(A) A rationale for including the alternative.

(B) A cost estimate of the alternative and an analysis of the quality of each cost estimate.

(C) A discussion of the benefits to be realized from the alternative.

(D) A best value determination of each alternative and a detailed explanation of the life-cycle cost

calculations used in the determination.

(c) When reviewing requirements or participating in acquisition planning that would result in a

military department or defense agency acquiring a military flight simulator, the contracting officer

shall notify the program officials of the prohibition in paragraph (b) of this subsection. If the

program officials decide to request a waiver from the Secretary of Defense under paragraph (b) of

this subsection, the contracting officer shall follow the procedures at PGI 237.102-71 .

Parent topic: 237.102 Policy.
APPENDIX - FF Table Of Contents

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PLAN FOR CONTROL OF NONSTANDARD CLAUSES

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PLAN FOR CONTROL OF

NONSTANDARD CLAUSES

September 3, 2014

1. PURPOSE. The purpose of this plan is to implement, maintain, and comply with a plan for

controlling the use of clauses other than those prescribed in the Federal Acquisition Regulation

(FAR) and the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) as required in DFARS

201.304(4). This plan supersedes the July 31, 2009, update.

2. DEFINITIONS.

a. Clause – The term “clause” includes solicitation provisions and means a term or condition of the

type set forth in FAR part 52 and DFARS part 252.

b. Deviation – The term “deviation” includes any clause that is inconsistent with the FAR or DFARS.

c. Regulation – The term “regulation” includes any contracting supplement, policy letter, clause

book, automated system, acquisition instruction (AI), or similar regulatory instrument.

3. REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF NONSTANDARD CLAUSES. Army contracting activities coordinate

all nonstandard clauses with the Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army (Procurement)

(ODASA(P)) Policy and Programs Directorate in accordance with Army Federal Acquisition

Regulation Supplement (AFARS) 5101.304(1)(i). The ODASA(P) Policy and Programs Directorate

coordinates with the Office of the Army General Counsel during review of nonstandard clauses.

a. Director of Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy (DPAP) Clause Approval –

(1) Obtain DPAP approval to use clauses that have a significant effect beyond the internal operating

procedures of the Army or impose a significant cost or administrative impact on contractors or

offerors (DFARS 201.304(1)). Included are class deviations from the FAR or DFARS (DFARS

201.404(b)) and the six categories of individual deviations set forth in DFARS 201.402(1).

(2) Coordinate with the ODASA(P) Policy and Programs Directorate to publish clauses requiring

DPAP approval in the Federal Register, conduct analysis to ensure compliance with the Paperwork

Reduction Act and the Regulatory Flexibility Act (FAR 1.301(c)), and analyze public comments.

Submit the clause and all analysis through the Defense Acquisition Regulations (DAR) Council

Director (DFARS 201.304(5) and AFARS 5101.301(b)).

b. Other than DPAP Clause Approval –

(1) Obtain Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army (Procurement) (DASA(P)) approval to use clauses

that do not require DPAP approval and do not require publication in the Federal Register for public

comment, but are included in contracting activity AIs or clause books.
1
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 17, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-50682

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

HILARIO VILLA TELLEZ, also known as Arturo

Villanueva-Garcia, also known as Hilario

Villa-Telles, also known as Hilario Villa-Tellas,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:03-CR-2016-ALL-KC

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Hilario Villa

Tellez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a

prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Case 2:06-cv-00616-MHT-SRW Document 11-2 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 1 of 1
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Authority:

7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

#### § 800.127 Who shall perform reinspection or review of weighing services.

Reinspection or review of weighing services shall be performed by the agency or field office that performed the original service.

[50 FR 45394, Oct. 31, 1985]
Editorial Note on Part 869
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 869 appear at 84 FR 45646, Aug. 30, 2019.

§ 869.6 Suspension, revocation and liquidation. ( a ) AMS may, after an opportunity for a hearing as provided in § 869.8, suspend, revoke or liquidate any license or agreement issued under the Act, for any violation of or failure to comply with any provision of the Act, regulations or any applicable licensing or provider agreement.
( b ) The reasons for a suspension, revocation or liquidation under this part include, but are not limited to: ( 1 ) Failure to perform licensed or authorized services as provided in this part or in the applicable licensing or provider agreement;
( 2 ) Failure to maintain minimum financial requirements as provided in the applicable licensing or provider agreement;
( 3 ) Failure to submit a proper annual financial statement within the established time period as provided in the applicable licensing or provider agreement.
( 4 ) Failure to maintain control of the warehouse or provider system.
( 5 ) The warehouse operator or provider requests closure, cancellation or liquidation. and
( 6 ) Commission of fraud against AMS, any depositor, EWR or OED holder or user, or any other function or operation under this part.
( c ) AMS retains USWA's full authority over a warehouse operator or provider for one year after such license revocation or provider agreement termination or until satisfaction of any claims filed against such warehouse operator or provider are resolved, whichever is later.
( d ) Upon AMS's determination that continued operation of a warehouse by a warehouse operator or an electronic provider system by a provider is likely to result in probable loss of assets to storage depositors, or loss of data integrity to EWR or OED holders and users. AMS may immediately suspend, close, or take control and begin an orderly liquidation of such warehouse inventory or provider system data as provided in this part or in the applicable licensing or provider agreement.
( e ) Any disputes involving probable loss of assets to storage depositors, or loss of data integrity to EWR or OED holders and users will be determined by AMS for the benefit of the depositors, or EWR or OED holders and users and such determinations shall be final.
[67 FR 50783, Aug. 5, 2002. Redesignated and amended at 84 FR 45645, 45646 Aug. 30, 2019]
#### Neil Hilliker, Appellant, v. Donald Fregelette, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Memorandum: The verdict is against the weight of the evidence. (Appeal from judgment of Chautauqua Trial Term dismissing complaint in an automobile negligence action.) Present —-Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Del Vecehio, JJ.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATION*

I, William A. Owen, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Outdoor Channel
Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this report fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

         (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting

Date: April 30, 2004     /s/ William A. Owen
                         -----------------------------------------------
                         WILLIAM A. OWEN, Chief Financial Officer
Editorial Note on Part 869
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 869 appear at 84 FR 45646, Aug. 30, 2019.

§ 869.300 Warehouse receipt requirements. ( a ) Warehouse receipts may be: ( 1 ) Negotiable or non-negotiable;
( 2 ) For a single unit, multiple units, identity preserved or commingled lot; and
( 3 ) In a paper or electronic format that, besides complying with the requirements of the Act, must be in a format as prescribed in the applicable licensing or provider agreement and authorized by AMS.
( b ) The warehouse operator must: ( 1 ) At the request of a depositor of an agricultural product stored or handled in a warehouse licensed under the Act, issue a warehouse receipt to the depositor;
( 2 ) Not issue a warehouse receipt for an agricultural product unless the agricultural product is actually stored in their warehouse at the time of issuance;
( 3 ) Not issue a warehouse receipt until the quality, condition and weight of such an agricultural product is ascertained by a licensed inspector and weigher;
( 4 ) Not directly or indirectly compel or attempt to compel the depositor to request the issuance of a warehouse receipt omitting the statement of quality or condition;
( 5 ) Not issue an additional warehouse receipt under the Act for a specific identity-preserved or commingled agricultural product lot (or any portion thereof) if another warehouse receipt representing the same specific identity-preserved or commingled lot of the agricultural product is outstanding. No two warehouse receipts issued by a warehouse operator may have the same warehouse receipt number or represent the same agricultural product lot;
( 6 ) When issuing a warehouse receipt and purposefully omitting any information, notate the blank to show such intent;
( 7 ) Not deliver any portion of an agricultural product for which they have issued a negotiable warehouse receipt until the warehouse receipt has been surrendered to them and canceled as prescribed in the applicable licensing agreement;
( 8 ) Not deliver more than 90% of the receipted quantity of an agricultural product for which they have issued a non-negotiable warehouse receipt until such warehouse receipt has been surrendered or the depositor or the depositor's agent has provided a written order for the agricultural product and the warehouse receipt surrendered upon final delivery; and
( 9 ) Deliver, upon proper presentation of a warehouse receipt for any agricultural product, and payment or tender of all advances and charges, to the depositor or lawful holder of such warehouse receipt the agricultural product of such identity, quantity, grade and condition as set forth in such warehouse receipt.
( c ) In the case of a lost or destroyed warehouse receipt, a new warehouse receipt upon the same terms, subject to the same conditions, and bearing on its face the number and the date of the original warehouse receipt may be issued.
#### § 52.33 Surrender of license.

Upon termination of his services as a licensed sampler or licensed inspector, or suspension or revocation of his license, such licensee shall surrender his license immediately to the office of inspection serving the area in which he is located. These same provisions shall apply in a case of an expired license.
219.811-3 Contract clauses.       (1) Use the clause at 252.219-7009, Section 8(a) Direct Award, instead of the clauses at FAR 52.219-11, Special 8(a) Contract Conditions, FAR 52.219-12, Special 8(a) Subcontract Conditions, and FAR 52.219-17, Section 8(a) Award, in solicitations and contracts processed in accordance with the PA cited in 219.800.          (2) Use the clause at 252.219-7010, Notification of Competition Limited to Eligible 8(a) Participants—Partnership Agreement, in lieu of the clause at FAR 52.219-18, Notification of Competition Limited to Eligible 8(a) Participants, in competitive solicitations and contracts, including solicitations and contracts using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services, when the acquisition is accomplished using the procedures of FAR 19.805 and processed in accordance with the PA cited in 219.800.          (3) Use the clause at 252.219-7011, Notification to Delay Performance, in solicitations and purchase orders issued under the PA cited in 219.800.    **Parent topic:** 219.811 Preparing the contracts.