alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# 225.870 Contracting with Canadian contractors.

- 225.870-1 General. 
- 225.870-2 Solicitation of Canadian contractors. 
- 225.870-3 Submission of offers. 
- 225.870-4 Contracting procedures. 
- 225.870-5 Contract administration. 
- 225.870-6 Termination procedures. 
- 225.870-7 Acceptance of Canadian supplies. 
- 225.870-8 Industrial security. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 225.8 - OTHER INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS AND COORDINATION
Exhibit
13.1






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the annual report of Ur-Energy Inc. (the "Corporation") on Form
20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, W. William Boberg,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:






(1)
            The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and




(2)
            The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the
  Corporation.




Date:
March 27, 2009




/s/
      W. William BobergW.
      William BobergPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer(principal
      executive officer)
Response to Comments:

A. The Baltimore Serious Area Attainment Demonstration Modeling Is Inadequate to Demonstrate Attainment of the NAAQS Because 2012 Monitored Data Shows Multiple Exceedances of the NAAQS

It is the EPA responsibility to determine the adequacy of a SIP. In doing so, the EPA can utilize a variety of tools including monitoring data from the AQS. MDE is required to submit a SIP that contains an attainment modeling demonstration and fulfill reasonable further progress goals. MDE utilized the EPA approved CMAQ model to complete the bump up ozone SIP and while attainment was not achieved, MDE does feel it is important that the plan be submitted to EPA as it shows that reasonable further progress emission reductions were achieved through 201 2. These reductions were enough for CMAQ to model attainment.

B. The Baltimore Serious Nonattainment SIP Is Inadequate to Demonstrate that the Area Will Reach Attainment Because the Measures it Contains Are Fully Implemented and Have Not to Date Result ed in Attainment of the 1997 Ozone NAAQS; Additional Measures Are Required

As part of their review of the SIP, EPA may require MDE to implement additional control measures or provide another SIP reflecting a new “severe” nonattainment status.

Additional measures will be required to meet a new nonattainment status or to attain the tougher 2008 ozone standard. MDE continues to seek emission reduction programs for inclusion in SIPS through regional processes like the OTC, stakeholder comments, and

continua lly review of technological advances. MDE appreciates the ideas and concepts offered by the commenter as means to further reduce emissions in Maryland.

C. MDE Can Achieve Additional Controls by Requiring Short

- Term Limits and

Cost

- Effective Pollution Co ntrols for Coal

- Fired Power Plants in the Baltimore

Nonattainment Area

As with the response to item B above, MDE continues to examine a ll possible emission reduction strategies. One is a possible restructure tightening of the Maryland Healthy Air

Act as a means of providing for further NOx reductions from the power sector in Maryland.

D. Maryland Should Pursue Long

- term Contracts for Renewables and Enhanced Energy Efficiency Targets Under EmPOWER Maryland As a Pathway to Reducing

Emissions of Ozone Prec ursors in the State

MDE is actively reviewing multi pollutant type planning whereas climate and energy policies provide for Ozone or other NAAQS benefits. MDE invites the commenter to offer similar suggestions as provided to the Maryland Energy Administ ration during the

review and stakeholder process for the EmPOWER program.
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Atlas Resources Public 16-2007 (A) L.P.
(the "Partnership") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Matthew A. Jones, Chief Financial Officer of the MGP, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
 
 1)
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and
 2)
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.
 
 By:
              /s/ Matthew A.
      JonesName:
              Matthew
      A. JonesTitle:
              Chief
      Financial Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
              March
      31, 2008
#### § 795.6 Multiple individuals or other entities.

The rules in §§ 795.5 through 795.16 shall be used to determine whether certain multiple individuals or legal entities are to be treated as one person or as separate persons for the purpose of applying the limitation. In cases in which more than one rule would appear to be applicable, the rule which is most restrictive on the number of persons shall apply.
#### ACHESON, Respondent, v. ILLINOIS SURETY CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department,

May 29, 1914.)

Action by Charles B. Acheson against the Illinois Surety Company.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

I, Christian Storch, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Altra Industrial Motion Corp.; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 6, 2017



By:

/s/ Christian StorchName:

Christian StorchTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 76396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30935]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATE AND TIME: Friday, March 11, 2011; 9:30 a.m. EST.

PLACE: 624 Ninth Street, NW., Room 540, Washington, DC 20425.

Briefing Agenda

    This briefing is open to the public.
    Topic: The Civil Rights Implications of Eminent Domain Abuse.

I. Introductory Remarks by Chairman.
II. Speakers' Presentations.
III. Questions by Commissioners and Staff Director.
IV. Adjourn Briefing.

CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, 
Public Affairs Unit (202) 376-8591. TDD: (202) 376-8116.
    Persons with a disability requiring special services, such as an 
interpreter for the hearing impaired, should contact Pamela Dunston at 
least seven days prior to the meeting at 202-376-8105. TDD: (202) 376-
8116.

    Dated: December 3, 2010.
David Blackwood,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010-30935 Filed 12-6-10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
252.219-7009 Section 8(a) Direct Award.       As prescribed in                 219.811-3             (1), use the following clause:          SECTION 8(a) DIRECT AWARD (OCT 2018)          (a)  This contract is issued as a direct award between the contracting office and the 8(a) Contractor pursuant to the Partnership Agreement between the Small Business Administration (SBA) and the Department of Defense.  Accordingly, the SBA, even if not identified in Section A of this contract, is the prime contractor and retains responsibility for 8(a) certification, for 8(a) eligibility determinations and related issues, and for providing counseling and assistance to the 8(a) Contractor under the 8(a) Program.  The cognizant SBA district office is:          ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________[To be completed by the Contracting Officer at the time of award]          (b)  The contracting office is responsible for administering the contract and for taking any action on behalf of the Government under the terms and conditions of the contract; provided that the contracting office shall give advance notice to the SBA before it issues a final notice terminating performance, either in whole or in part, under the contract.  The contracting office also shall coordinate with the SBA prior to processing any novation agreement.  The contracting office may assign contract administration functions to a contract administration office.          (c)  The 8(a) Contractor agrees that it will notify the Contracting Officer, simultaneous with its notification to the SBA (as required by SBA’s 8(a) regulations at 13 CFR 124.515), when the owner or owners upon whom 8(a) eligibility is based plan to relinquish ownership or control of the concern.  Consistent with section 407 of Public Law 100-656, transfer of ownership or control shall result in termination of the contract for convenience, unless the SBA waives the requirement for termination prior to the actual relinquishing of ownership and control.          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 252.219 RESERVED
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications

  I, Kristen Ann Cronin, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A and all reports on Form 10-D
     required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report
     on Form 10-K/A of Deutsche Alt-A Securities Mortgage Loan Trust, Series
     2006-AR4 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
     light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

  4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
     servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
     conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
     this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
     in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
     their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects;
     and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
     criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
     reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
     asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
     accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
     13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
     except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances
     of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
     this report on Form 10-K/A.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
     information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
     Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP as Servicer, GMAC Mortgage, LLC
     f/k/a GMAC Mortgage Corporation as Servicer and GreenPoint Mortgage
     Funding, Inc. as Servicer.

     Dated:    May 28, 2008

     /s/ Kristen Ann Cronin
     Signature

     Vice President
     (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master servicer)
225.7703-2 Determination requirements.

Before use of a procedure specified in 225.7703-1 (a), a written determination must be prepared and

executed as follows:

(a) For products or services to be used only by the military forces, police, or other security personnel

of Afghanistan, the contracting officer shall—

(1) Determine in writing that the product or service is to be used only by the military forces, police,

or other security personnel of Afghanistan; and

(2) Include the written determination in the contract file.

(b) For products or services not limited to use by the military forces, police, or other security

personnel of Afghanistan, the following requirements apply:

(1) The appropriate official specified in paragraph (b)(2) of this subsection must determine in writing

that it is in the national security interest of the United States to use a procedure specified in

225.7703-1 (a), because—

(i) The procedure is necessary to provide a stable source of jobs in Afghanistan; and

(ii) Use of the procedure will not adversely affect—

(A) Operations in Afghanistan (including security, transition, reconstruction, and humanitarian relief

activities); or

(B) The U.S. industrial base. The authorizing official generally may presume that there will not be an

adverse effect on the U.S. industrial base. However, when in doubt, the authorizing official should

coordinate with the applicable subject matter expert specified in PGI 225.7703-2 (b).

(2) Determinations may be made for an individual acquisition or a class of acquisitions meeting the

criteria in paragraph (b)(1) of this subsection as follows:

(i) The head of the contacting activity is authorized to make a determination that applies to an

individual acquisition with a value of less than $100 million.

(ii) The Principal Director, Defense Pricing and Contracting, and the following officials, without

power of redelegation, are authorized to make a determination that applies to an individual

acquisition with a value of $100 million or more or to a class of acquisitions:

(A) Defense Logistics Agency Component Acquisition Executive.

(B) Army Acquisition Executive.

(C) Navy Acquisition Executive.

(D) Air Force Acquisition Executive.

(E) Commander of the United States Central Command Joint Theater Support Contracting Command

(C–JTSCC).
(3) The contracting officer—

(i) Shall include the applicable written determination in the contract file; and

(ii) Shall ensure that each contract action taken pursuant to the authority of a class determination is

within the scope of the class determination, and shall document the contract file for each action

accordingly.

(c) See PGI 225.7703-2 (c) for formats for use in preparation of the determinations required by this

subsection.

Parent topic: 225.7703 Enhanced authority to acquire products or services from Afghanistan.
Exhibit
13.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of Rodman International Enterprise III,
Ltd.(the "Company")
on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Kirk M. Warshaw, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:
June 23, 2010





/s/ Kirk M. WarshawKirk
      M. WarshawChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)





A signed
original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 3 Filed 07/19/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00642-MEF-SRW Document 3 Filed 07/19/2006 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 298 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 298

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the reduction in 
       the deductible portion of expenses for business meals and 
                             entertainment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 7, 2005

  Mr. Inouye introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the reduction in 
       the deductible portion of expenses for business meals and 
                             entertainment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF REDUCTION IN BUSINESS MEALS AND ENTERTAINMENT TAX 
              DEDUCTION.

    (a) In General.--Section 274(n)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (relating to only 50 percent of meal and entertainment expenses 
allowed as deduction) is amended by striking ``50 percent'' and 
inserting ``the applicable percentage''.
    (b) Applicable Percentage.--Section 274(n) of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 is amended by striking paragraph (3) and inserting the 
following:
            ``(3) Applicable percentage.--For purposes of paragraph 
        (1), the term `applicable percentage' means the percentage 
        determined under the following table:

``For taxable years beginning                            The applicable
   in calendar year--                                   percentage is--
    2005..........................................                  70 
    2006 or 2007..................................                  75 
    2008 or thereafter............................               80.''.
    (c) Conforming Amendment.--The heading for section 274(n) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``Only 50 
percent'' and inserting ``Portion''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2004.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2576 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2576

 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain golf club driver heads of 
                               titanium.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 6, 2006

Mr. Kerry (for himself and Mr. Kennedy) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain golf club driver heads of 
                               titanium.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN GOLF CLUB DRIVER HEADS OF TITANIUM.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.95.14      Golf club driver    Free         No Change        No Change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         heads of                                                           31/2009
                         titanium, each
                         with a rhombus
                         shaped center
                         face insert and a
                         laser welded face
                         plate, and with
                         10.5 degree loft
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         9506.39.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. Case No.: 4:01cr46-SPM

CHRISTOPHER PATRICK GILYARD,

Defendant.

______________________________/ 

NOTICE OF INTENT TO REDUCE SENTENCE

This cause is before the Court upon Defendant’s Petition for Reduction of

Term of Imprisonment (doc. 77). Review of the record in this case reveals that

the defendant, Christopher Gilyard, may be entitled to a sentence reduction

based on a guideline amendment that lowers the guideline sentencing range for

certain categories of offenses involving crack cocaine. U.S.S.G. Amend. 750. 

Amendment 750 was made retroactive, effective November 1, 2011.

Gilyard was sentenced in 2002. His guideline range at that time was 360

months to life imprisonment. Gilyard was sentenced to 360 months, the bottom

of the guideline range.

Based on Amendment 750, Gilyard’s guideline range would be reduced to

292 to 365 months. A sentence and the bottom of this new guideline range is

292 months.
As authorized under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), the Court intends to enter an

order reducing Gilyard’s sentence to 292 months. Should there be objections to

this proposed action by the Court, those objections must be filed by November

21, 2011. Copies of any such objections shall be served on all other interested

parties, i.e., the Defendant, retained defense counsel if any, the United States

Public Defender, the United States Attorney, and the Bureau of Prisons, as

appropriate.

The Clerk shall send a copy of this notice to the Defendant, retained

defense counsel if any, the United States Public Defender, the United States

Attorney, and the Bureau of Prisons.

SO ORDERED this 7th day of November, 2011.

S/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

-2-