alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3120 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3120

  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain parts and accessories of 
                   measuring or checking instruments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2006

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain parts and accessories of 
                   measuring or checking instruments.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN PARTS AND ACCESSORIES OF MEASURING OR CHECKING 
              INSTRUMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.90.31        Parts and accessories   Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           of instruments and                                                31/2009          ''
                           apparatus for                                                                       .
                           measuring or checking
                           electrical
                           quantities, specially
                           designed for
                           telecommunications
                           (provided for in
                           subheading
                           9030.90.88), not
                           including printed
                           circuit assemblies
                           (provided for in
                           subheading
                           9030.90.88)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
with respects to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EX-35 (j)
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK

OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Re: The servicing agreement dated as of November 1, 2005 (as amended, the
"Agreement"), among Washington Mutual Bank as Servicer and Merrill Lynch
Mortgage Lending Inc. as Owner, with respect to Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors
Trust, Series 2006-AF1, "MLMI 2006-AF1" (the "Securitization").


I, H. John Berens, a Senior Vice President of Washington Mutual Bank (the
"Servicer"), certify to the Owner, the Depositor and the Master Servicer under
the Securitization, the following for the 2006 fiscal year (the "Relevant
Year"):


1. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the Relevant Year and of
performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects
throughout the Relevant Year.



Dated as of February 22, 2007.


/s/ H. John Berens
Name:  H. John Berens
Title: Senior Vice President
§ 764.303 Limitations. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 65041 , Aug. 8, 2024.
( a ) The applicant must comply with the general limitations established at § 764.102.
( b ) The total principal balance owed by the applicant to the Agency on all Youth loans at any one time cannot exceed $5,000.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D19-523

_____________________________

S.S., Mother of T.D. and L.D., 

Minor Children,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND 

FAMILIES,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

James P. Nilon, Judge.

July 3, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, WETHERELL, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Henri C. Cawthon of Law Office of Henri C. Cawthon, P.A., 

Gainesville, for Appellant.

Ward L. Metzger, Appellate Counsel, Department of Children and 

Families, Jacksonville, for Appellee.

Thomasina F. Moore, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Laura J. 

Lee, Senior Attorney, Appellate Division, Florida Statewide 

Guardian ad Litem Office, Tallahassee.
EX-35 (b)
GREENPOINT MORTGAGE FUNDING, INC.

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

MSM 2006-12

I, Michael De Francesco, an authorized officer of GreenPoint Mortgage Funding,
Inc. (the "Servicer"), certify that:

1.      A review of the Servicer's activities during the period from and
including January 1, 2006 through and including December 31, 2006 (or applicable
portion thereof) and of the Servicer's performance under the applicable
servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.

2.      To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all
material respects throughout such period.

Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings ascribed to them
in the Agreement.


Date: February 28, 2007
/s/ Michael De Francesco
Michael De Francesco
Senior Vice President, Loan Administration
| 1.   | The      Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the annual period ended      September 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m);      and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:            |   | December  29,      2008                |
|------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|
|  Signature: |   |  /s/Charles      B. Rockwood                |
|  Title:     |   |  Chief      Operating and Financial Officer |
Editorial Note on Part 869
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 869 appear at 84 FR 45646, Aug. 30, 2019.

§ 869.110 Conditions for delivery of agricultural products. ( a ) In the absence of a lawful excuse, a warehouse operator will, without unnecessary delay, deliver the agricultural product stored or handled in the warehouse on a demand made by: ( 1 ) The holder of the warehouse receipt for the agricultural product; or
( 2 ) The person that deposited the agricultural product, if no warehouse receipt has been issued.
( b ) Prior to delivery of the agricultural product, payment of the accrued charges associated with the storage or handling of the agricultural product, including satisfaction of the warehouse operator's lien, must be made if requested by the warehouse operator.
( c ) When the holder of a warehouse receipt requests delivery of an agricultural product covered by the warehouse receipt, the holder must surrender the warehouse receipt to the warehouse operator before obtaining the agricultural product.
( d ) A warehouse operator must cancel each warehouse receipt surrendered to the warehouse operator upon the delivery of the agricultural product for which the warehouse receipt was issued and in accordance with the applicable licensing agreement.
( e ) For the purpose of this part, unless prevented from doing so by force majeure, a warehouse operator will deliver or ship such agricultural products stored or handled in their warehouse as prescribed in the applicable licensing agreement.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 2:06-cr-169-WKW

 )

DARNELL MONTREZE BROWN )

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD PROSEQUENDUM

TO THE HONORABLE SUSAN RUSS WALKER, UNITED STATES

MAGISTRATE JUDGE:

Comes now the United States of America, by and through its Attorney for the Middle District

of Alabama, and represents and shows unto the Court that there is pending in the United States

District Court for the Middle District of Alabama an Indictment against Darnell Montreze Brown

now in custody of Chilton County Jail, Clanton, Alabama, and that said cause is set for a hearing at

Montgomery, Alabama, in this Honorable Court on April 26, 2007, at 4:00 p.m.

WHEREFORE, the United States Attorney prays that your Honor will direct the Clerk of this

Court to issue a WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD PROSEQUENDUM addressed to Chilton

County Jail, Clanton, Alabama, commanding them to deliver said prisoner to any United States

Marshal or Deputy United States Marshal and directing said Marshal or Deputy to bring said prisoner

before this Honorable Court to be held at Montgomery, Alabama, on April 26, 2007, at 4:00 p.m.

Respectfully submitted this the 25th of April, 2007.

LEURA GARRETT CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/ A. Clark Morris

A. CLARK MORRIS

Assistant United States Attorney

Post Office Box 197

Montgomery, Alabama 36101-0197

334.223.7280

334.223.7135 fax

clark.morris@usdoj.gov

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 209 Filed 04/25/2007 Page 1 of 2
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 2:06-cr-169-WKW

 )

DARNELL MONTREZE BROWN )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on April 25, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of

the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to all attorneys on

record.

LEURA G. CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/ A. Clark Morris

A. CLARK MORRIS

Assistant United States Attorney

Post Office Box 197

Montgomery, Alabama 36101-0197

334.223.7280

334.223.7135 fax

clark.morris@usdoj.gov

Case 2:06-cr-00169-WKW-SRW Document 209 Filed 04/25/2007 Page 2 of 2
52.228-8 Liability and Insurance-Leased Motor Vehicles.       As prescribed in 28.312, insert the following clause:          Liability and Insurance-Leased Motor Vehicles (May 1999)                                       (a) 						            The Government shall be responsible for loss of or damage to-                                                         (1) 								                Leased vehicles, except for-                                                                           (i) 										                    Normal wear and tear; and                                                                              (ii) 										                    Loss or damage caused by the negligence of the Contractor, its agents, or employees; and                                                                                                           (2) 								                Property of third persons, or the injury or death of third persons, if the Government is liable for such loss, damage, injury, or death under the Federal Tort Claims Act (28 U.S.C.2671-2680).                                                                             (b) 						            The Contractor shall be liable for, and shall indemnify and hold harmless the Government against, all actions or claims for loss of or damage to property or the injury or death of persons, resulting from the fault, negligence, or wrongful act or omission of the Contractor, its agents, or employees.                                          (c) 						            The Contractor shall provide and maintain insurance covering its liabilities under paragraph (b) of this clause, in amounts of at least $200,000 per person and $500,000 per occurrence for death or bodily injury and $20,000 per occurrence for property damage or loss.                                          (d) 						            Before commencing work under this contract, the Contractor shall notify the Contracting Officer in writing that the required insurance has been obtained. The policies evidencing required insurance shall contain an endorsement to the effect that any cancellation or any material change adversely affecting the interests of the Government shall not be effective (1) for such period as the laws of the State in which this contract is to be performed prescribe or (2) until 30 days after written notice to the Contracting Officer, whichever period is longer. The policies shall exclude any claim by the insurer for subrogation against the Government by reason of any payment under the policies.                                          (e) 						            The contract price shall not include any costs for insurance or contingency to cover losses, damage, injury, or death for which the Government is responsible under paragraph (a) of this clause.                                 (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.228 [Reserved]
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

KAMARCCUS J. WEBSTER,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 3:20cv5727-MCR/MJF

SECRETARY, FLORIDA 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

__________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report 

and Recommendation dated March 29, 2021. ECF No. 15. The parties were

furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and were afforded an 

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 

636(b)(1). The Court has made a de novo determination of those portions to which 

an objection was made.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation and all objections thereto 

timely filed, the Court concludes that the Report and Recommendation should be 

adopted.

Case 3:20-cv-05727-MCR-MJF Document 17 Filed 04/21/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:20cv5727-MCR/MJF

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 15, is 

adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss, ECF No. 10, is GRANTED.

3. The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 7, challenging 

Petitioner’s judgment of conviction and sentence in State of Florida v. Kamarccus 

Jaleel Webster, Escambia County Circuit Court Case No. 2014-CF-00909, is

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as time barred.

4. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

5. The Clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 21st day of April 2021.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-05727-MCR-MJF Document 17 Filed 04/21/21 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division 

                    Notice is hereby given that, on January 14, 2010, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 5 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), the Joint Venture under TIP Award Number: 70NANB10H012 (“JVTIP70NANB10H012”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties to the venture and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                 

Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties to the venture are: Pixelligent Technologies, LLC, College Park, MD; and Brewer Science, Inc., Rolla, MO. The general area of JVTIP70NANE10H012's planned activity is to develop new processes and technologies to scale up the production of high-quality nanocomposites, nanocrystals dispersed in polymers, to create materials with enhanced performance and new functionality that cannot be provided by polymers or traditional composites. 

Patricia A. Brink, 

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2010-3093 Filed 2-19-10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

STINNETT GROUP, LLC, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 1:06-cv-634-WKW

)

AUTO OWNERS INSURANCE, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

RULE 26(f) ORDER

The parties are hereby reminded of the obligation, imposed by Rule 26(f) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to confer and to develop a proposed discovery plan. 

The Rule 26(f) report containing the discovery plan shall be filed as soon as practicable

but not later than August 23, 2006.

The longstanding practice in this district is that dispositive motions shall be filed

no later than 90 days prior to the pretrial date. If the parties seek to vary from that

schedule, they should present, in the plan, specific case related reasons for the requested

variance.

This case will be set for trial before the undersigned judge during one of that

judge's regularly scheduled civil trial terms. The pretrial date is normally set within four

to six weeks of a scheduled trial term. The dates of each judge's civil trial terms are

available on the court's website located at http://almd.uscourts.gov in the civil case

information section.

Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 5 Filed 08/03/2006 Page 1 of 2
This court may or may not hold a scheduling conference before issuing a

scheduling order. If the court holds a scheduling conference, counsel may participate in

the scheduling conference by conference call.

The scheduling order entered by the court will follow the form of the Uniform

Scheduling Order adopted by the judges of this court. The Uniform Scheduling Order is

also available on the court's website.

The report of the parties should comply with Form 35 of the Appendix of Forms to

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

DONE this 3rd day of August, 2006.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00634-WKW-WC Document 5 Filed 08/03/2006 Page 2 of 2
1

 Under the briefing schedule established by the court’s previous order, defendants’

response is presently due on December 18, 2006.

2

 Plaintiff argues that it “had no duty to sell the repossessed equipment, let alone sell

the repossessed equipment in a manner that meets the U.C.C.’s requirements for a

commercially reasonable sale.” (Doc. # 14, pp. 2-3). However, plaintiff did, in fact, sell the

equipment and now seeks recovery pursuant to the liquidated damages provision in the

contract which applies upon such sale by the lessor. (See Exhibit E to Craver aff.). It

appears to the court that this provision is not “a formula that is reasonable” as required by

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 25-2A-504(1) absent an implied duty of mitigation – i.e., to sell at a

commercially reasonable price – and thus, that the discovery sought by defendants is relevant

to this action.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

VFS LEASING CO., )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06cv638-SRW

) (WO)

G. F. KELLY, INC. d/b/a )

KELLY TRUCKING; and GUY KELLY, )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

This action is presently before the court on the Rule 56(f) motion filed by defendants

on November 30, 2006 (Doc. # 13) seeking an extension of time until January 31, 2007 to

respond to plaintiff’s pending motion for summary judgment.1

 Upon consideration of the

motion, and plaintiff’s response in opposition filed on December 1, 2006 (Doc. # 14), it is

ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED.2

 Plaintiff may file its reply brief within

eleven days after defendants’ response is filed.

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 15 Filed 12/04/2006 Page 1 of 2
DONE, this 4th day of December, 2006.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 3:06-cv-00638-SRW Document 15 Filed 12/04/2006 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of NextWave Wireless Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K (the “Form 10-K”) for the period ended January 1, 2011, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Francis J. Harding, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:
 
 (1)
The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/ Francis J. HardingFrancis J. Harding
 
 Executive Vice President – Chief Financial Officer
 (Principal Financial Officer)
 
 Dated:
March 16, 2011
# 225.7018 Restriction on acquisition of certain magnets, tantalum, and tungsten.

- 225.7018-1 Definitions. 
- 225.7018-2 Restriction. 
- 225.7018-3 Exceptions. 
- 225.7018-4 Nonavailability determination. 
- 225.7018-5 Contract clause. 

**Parent topic:**Subpart 225.70 - AUTHORIZATION ACTS, APPROPRIATIONS ACTS, AND OTHER STATUTORY RESTRICTIONS ON FOREIGN ACQUISITION