alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
252.225-7023 Preference for Products or Services from Afghanistan.       As prescribed in                 225.7703-4             (a), use the following provision:          PREFERENCE FOR PRODUCTS OR SERVICES FROM AFGHANISTAN (SEP 2013)          (a)  *Definitions*.  “Product from Afghanistan” and “service from Afghanistan,” as used in this provision, are defined in the clause of this solicitation entitled “Requirement for Products or Services from Afghanistan” (DFARS                 252.225-7024             ).          (b)  *Representation*.  The offeror represents that all products or services to be delivered under a contract resulting from this solicitation are products from Afghanistan or services from Afghanistan, except those listed in—          (1)  Paragraph (c) of this provision; or          (2)  Paragraph (c)(2) of the provision entitled “Trade Agreements Certificate,” if included in this solicitation.          (c)  *Other products or services*.  The following offered products or services are not products from Afghanistan or services from Afghanistan:          (Line Item Number)		(Country of Origin)          (d)  *Evaluation*.  For the purpose of evaluating competitive offers, the Contracting Officer will increase by 50 percent the prices of offers of products or services that are not products or services from Afghanistan.          (End of provision)    **Parent topic:** 252.225 RESERVED
#### § 75.16 Accessibility of seeds.

Each lot of seed for which a lot inspection is requested shall be placed by the applicant so as to permit the entire lot to be sampled and a representative sample to be obtained as required.
MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF BEXAR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on August 23, 2017, the cause upon appeal to 

revise or reverse your judgment between

City of San Antonio, Appellant

V.

Britnee Amber Reyes and Stephanie Aguirre, Appellee

No. 04-16-00748-CV and Tr. Ct. No. 2015CV05655

was determined, and therein our said Court of Appeals made its order in these words:

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order 

denying the City’s plea to the jurisdiction is REVERSED. Judgment is 

RENDERED dismissing this cause for lack of jurisdiction.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth 

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of 

Texas, with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on November 1, 2017.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

____________________________

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTH DISTRICT, AT SAN ANTONIO

No. 04-16-00748-CV

City of San Antonio

v.

Britnee Amber Reyes and Stephanie Aguirre

(NO. 2015CV05655 IN COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF BEXAR COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

MOTION FEE

STATEWIDE EFILING FEE

FILING

INDIGENT

SUPREME COURT CHAPTER 51 

FEE

$10.00

$30.00

$100.00

$25.00

$50.00

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

N/A

BARBARA WAGNER

BARBARA WAGNER

BARBARA WAGNER

BARBARA WAGNER

Balance of costs owing to the Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK OF THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF 

TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of 

THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and 

payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for 

the Fourth District of Texas, this November 1, 2017.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

____________________________

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

DAVID FINNEY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 3:06-cv-622-WKW

)

NISSAN NORTH AMERICAN, INC.,, et al., ) 

)

Defendants. )

RULE 26(f) ORDER

The parties are hereby reminded of the obligation, imposed by Rule 26(f) of the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure, to confer and to develop a proposed discovery plan. The Rule 26(f)

report containing the discovery plan shall be filed as soon as practicable but not later than

October 3, 2006.

The longstanding practice in this district is that dispositive motions shall be filed no later

than 90 days prior to the pretrial date. If the parties seek to vary from that schedule, they should

present, in the plan, specific case related reasons for the requested variance.

This case will be set for trial before the undersigned judge during one of that judge's

regularly scheduled civil trial terms. The pretrial date is normally set within four to six weeks of

a scheduled trial term. The dates of each judge's civil trial terms are available on the court's

website located at http://almd.uscourts.gov in the civil case information section.

This court may or may not hold a scheduling conference before issuing a scheduling

order. If the court holds a scheduling conference, counsel may participate in the scheduling

conference by conference call.

The scheduling order entered by the court will follow the form of the Uniform Scheduling

Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 18 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 1 of 2
Order adopted by the judges of this court. The Uniform Scheduling Order is also available on the

court's website.

The report of the parties should comply with Form 35 of the Appendix of Forms to the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

DONE this 11th day of September, 2006.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 18 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 2 of 2
§ 760.707 Proof of loss. ( a ) All certifications, applications, and documentation are subject to spot check and verification by FSA. Producers must submit documentation to FSA if and when FSA requests documentation to substantiate any certified application.
( b ) Producers are responsible for retaining or providing, when required, verifiable or reliable production or loss records available for the crop. Producers are also responsible for summarizing all the production or loss evidence and providing the information in a manner that can be understood by the county committee.
( c ) Any producer receiving payment under this subpart agrees to maintain any books, records, and accounts supporting any information or certification made according to this part for 3 years after the end of the year following application.
( d ) Producers receiving payments or any other person who furnishes such information to FSA must permit FSA or authorized representatives of USDA and the General Accounting Office during regular business hours to inspect, examine, and to allow such persons to make copies of such books, records or other items for the purpose of confirming the accuracy of the information provided by the producer.
I,  Alan E. Wiley,  certify  that:

1.   I  have  reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Eye Care Centers of
     America,  Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a  material  fact  or  omit  to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were  made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to  the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other financial
     information  included  in  this  report,  fairly  present  in  all material
     respects  the  financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the  registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods presented in this report;

4.   The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), for the registrant and have:

     a)   Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
          disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed  under  our
          supervision,  to  ensure  that  material  information  relating to the
          registrant,  including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us  by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which  this  report  is  being  prepared;

     b)   Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures, and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of  the  period  covered  by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c)   Disclosed  in  this  report  any  change  in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          first  fiscal  quarter  that has materially affected, or is reasonably
          likely  to  materially  affect, the registrant's internal control over
          financial  reporting.

5.   The  registrant's  other  certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the  registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
     directors  (or  persons  performing  the  equivalent  function):

     a)   All  significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation  of  internal  control  over  financial  reporting which are
          reasonably  likely  to  adversely  affect  the registrant's ability to
          record,  process,  summarize  and  report  financial  information; and

     b)   Any  fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees  who  have  a  significant role in the registrant's internal
          control  over  financial  reporting.

Date:  August  10,  2004
/S/  Alan E. Wiley
-----------------------
Alan E. Wiley
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
# L_2014337DE.01006801.xml

| 25.11.2014 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 337/68 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2014

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 337/68

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 703/2014 der Kommission vom 19. Juni 2014 zur Änderung der Anhänge II, III und V der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 396/2005 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates hinsichtlich der Höchstgehalte an Rückständen von Acibenzolar-S- methyl, Ethoxyquin, Flusilazol, Isoxaflutol, Molinat, Propoxycarbazon, Pyraflufen-ethyl, Quinoclamin und Warfarin in oder auf bestimmten Erzeugnissen

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 186 vom 26. Juni 2014
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 186 vom 26. Juni 2014

Auf Seite 2, Erwägungsgrund 4, letzter Satz:

anstatt:

„Da ein Risiko für Verbraucher bei Rückständen unterhalb des geltenden RHG nicht ausgeschlossen werden kann, sollte für Birnen ein Wert von 0,05 mg/kg ab Inkrafttreten dieser Verordnung gelten.“

muss es heißen:

„Da ein Risiko für Verbraucher bei Rückständen unterhalb des geltenden RHG nicht ausgeschlossen werden kann, sollte für Birnen ein Wert von 0,05 mg/kg ab Geltungsbeginn dieser Verordnung gelten.“

Auf Seite 2, Erwägungsgrund 6, letzter Satz:

anstatt:

„Daher sollte für Pfirsiche ein Wert von 0,01 mg/kg ab Inkrafttreten dieser Verordnung gelten.“

muss es heißen:

„Daher sollte für Pfirsiche ein Wert von 0,01 mg/kg ab Geltungsbeginn dieser Verordnung gelten.“

---
Subpart 223.1 - Reserved

Parent topic: Part 223 - ENVIRONMENT, ENERGY AND WATER EFFICIENCY,

RENEWABLEENERGY TECHNOLOGIES, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY, AND DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE
52.234-3 Notice of Earned Value Management System-Post Award Postaward Integrated Baseline Review.       As prescribed in 34.203(b) use the following provision:          Notice of Earned Value Management System-Post Award Postaward Integrated Baseline Review (Nov 2016)                                       (a) The offeror shall provide documentation that the Cognizant Federal Agency has determined that the proposed earned value management system (EVMS) complies with the EVMS guidelines in Electronic Industries Alliance Standard 748 (EIA-748) (current version at time of solicitation).                                          (b) If the offeror proposes to use a system that has not been determined to be in compliance with the requirements of paragraph (a) of this provision, the offeror shall submit a comprehensive plan for compliance with the EVMS guidelines.                                                         (1) The plan shall-                                                                           (i) Describe the EVMS the offeror intends to use in performance of the contracts;                                                                              (ii) Distinguish between the offeror’s existing management system and modifications proposed to meet the guidelines;                                                                              (iii) Describe the management system and its application in terms of the EVMS guidelines;                                                                              (iv) Describe the proposed procedure for administration of the guidelines, as applied to subcontractors; and                                                                              (v) Provide documentation describing the process and results of any third-party or self-evaluation of the system’s compliance with the EVMS guidelines.                                                                                                           (2) The offeror shall provide information and assistance as required by the Contracting Officer to support review of the plan                                                            (3) The Government will review and approve the offeror’s plan for an EVMS before contract award.                                                            (4) The offeror’s EVMS plan must provide milestones that indicate when the offeror anticipates that the EVM system will be compliant with the EIA-748 guidelines.                                                                             (c) Offerors shall identify the major subcontractors, or major subcontracted effort if major subcontractors have not been selected, planned for application of the guidelines. The prime Contractor and the Government shall agree to subcontractors selected for application of the EVMS guidelines.                                           (End of provision)    **Parent topic:** 52.234 [Reserved]
1 

### Ogulei, David

From: Warchol, Dennis <dennis.warchol@veolia.com> Sent: Friday, December 20, 2013 11:40 AM To: Ogulei, David Subject: Veolia's Waste Analysis Plan Attachments: Veolia'sWAP.pdf



### David,

**Attached pursuant to your request is the current Ve olia Waste Analysis Plan. Please call if you have a**  **ny questions.**
#### § 58.51 Information required on official identification.

Each official identification shall conspicuously indicate the U.S. grade of the product it identifies, if there be a grade, or such other appropriate terminology as may be approved by the Administrator. Also, it shall include the appropriate phrase: “Officially graded,” “Officially Inspected,” or “Federal-State graded.” When required by the Administrator, the package label, carton, or wrapper bearing official identification for dairy products shall be stamped or perforated with the date packed and the certificate number or a code number to indicate lot and date packed. Such coding shall be made available to and approved by the Administrator.
52.252-1 Solicitation Provisions Incorporated

by Reference.

As prescribed in 52.107(a), insert the following provision:

Solicitation Provisions Incorporated by Reference (Feb 1998)

This solicitation incorporates one or more solicitation provisions by reference, with the same force

and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full

text available. The offeror is cautioned that the listed provisions may include blocks that must be

completed by the offeror and submitted with its quotation or offer. In lieu of submitting the full text

of those provisions, the offeror may identify the provision by paragraph identifier and provide the

appropriate information with its quotation or offer. Also, the full text of a solicitation provision may

be accessed electronically at this/these address(es):

_____________________________________________ _____________________________________________

_____________________________________________ [Insert one or more Internet addresses]

(End of provision)

Parent topic: 52.252 [Reserved]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3022 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3022

         To suspend temporarily the duty on certain camel hair.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 24, 2006

Mr. Lieberman (for himself and Mr. Dodd) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on certain camel hair.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN CAMEL HAIR.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.12.20        Camel hair, processed   Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/  ''
                           beyond the degreased                                              31/2009           .
                           or carbonized
                           condition (provided
                           for in subheading
                           5102.19.90)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 51.2963 Dark discoloration.

*Dark discoloration* means that the color of the skin of the kernel is darker than “amber”. (See color chart.)
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.9


SUMMARY OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
(Effective March 2017)


Cash Compensation
    
Directors of Kadant Inc. (the “company”) who are not employees are paid the following fees for serving on our board of directors:


		
	•
	An annual retainer of $50,000.


		
	•
	An additional annual retainer for our non-executive chairman of the board of $60,000. 


		
	•
	An additional annual retainer for chairmen of the following committees: 


		
	•
	audit committee - $10,000; 


		
	•
	compensation committee - $7,500; 


		
	•
	nominating and corporate governance committee - $5,000; and 


		
	•
	risk oversight committee - $5,000.


		
	•
	Reimbursement of out-of pocket expenses incurred in attending or participating in meetings of our board of directors or its committees.




We do not provide any meeting fees to our directors for their board service. All annual retainers are paid in equal monthly installments.


Restricted Stock Units
    
Each of our non-employee directors also receives an annual award, as determined by the Board of Directors, of stock-settled restricted stock units (“RSUs”), distributable in shares of common stock upon vesting. The RSUs vest in four equal installments on the last day of each of the company’s fiscal quarters during the year.
All awards are made under our company’s stockholder-approved equity incentive plans. The vesting of all awards accelerates in the event of a change in control of our company. Any awards, to the extent not previously vested, are forfeited if the recipient is no longer a member of our board of directors on the vesting dates for any reason other than a change-in-control of the company. The terms and conditions governing these awards are stated in the form of restricted stock unit award agreement for non-employee directors filed as exhibits to the company’s annual report on Form 10-K.


Stock Ownership Guidelines


Under our stock ownership guidelines adopted in March 2011, our directors are required to hold shares of our company’s common stock equivalent in value to three times their annual cash retainer. Compliance with the guidelines is measured annually following the close of the fiscal year, and directors have five years from the later of adoption of our stock ownership guidelines or their appointment as a director to attain compliance.
Burke Grant of Restricted Stock (July 1, 2017)  (00451575.DOCX;3)


CANCELLATION OF GRANT OF RESTRICTED STOCK

 

THIS CANCELLATION OF GRANT OF RESTRICTED STOCK (this “Agreement”), dated February 23, 2018 (the “Effective Date”), is made by and between CANNASYS, INC., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and PATRICK G. BURKE, an executive of the Company residing in Colorado (“Grantee”), on the following:   

 

Premises

 

On December 29, 2017, the Company granted to Grantee 8,000,000 shares of its restricted common stock (the “Grantee Shares”) to vest over one year on a quarterly basis under the terms of a Grant of Restricted Stock. In connection with Grantee’s resignation from his positions as officer of the Company and as a director on the Company’s board of directors, Grantee and the Company agreed to cancel the stock grant and replace it with a promissory note in the principal amount of $21,000.  

 

Agreement

 

NOW, THEREFORE, upon these premises, which are incorporated herein by reference, and for and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants set forth herein, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 

 

1.Cancellation of Stock Grant. The Company hereby cancels the Grant of Restricted Stock, and Grantee agrees to forfeit his right to any vested Grantee Shares and acknowledges that no certificates were issued, in exchange for a promissory note in the principal amount of $21,000.  

 

2.General Provisions.  

 

(a)This Agreement and the Company’s charter documents constitute the entire agreement and understanding of the parties hereto concerning the subject matter hereof and from and after the date of this Agreement, and this Agreement shall supersede any other prior negotiations, discussions, writings, agreements, or understandings, both written and oral, between the parties respecting such subject matter. 

 

(b)This Agreement may be executed in duplicate counterparts, each of which is deemed to be an original and both of which taken together constitute one and the same agreement. 

 

(c)This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the state of Nevada, without giving effect to any choice of law or conflict of law provision or rule (whether of the state of Nevada or any other jurisdiction) that would cause the application of the law of any jurisdiction other than the state of Nevada.  

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above. 

 

	GRANTEE

	 

	CANNASYS, INC.


	 

	 

	 

	 


	 

	 

	 

	 


	/s/ Patrick G. Burke

	 

	By:

	/s/ Michael A. Tew


	PATRICK G. BURKE

	 

	 

	Michael A. Tew, Chief Executive Officer





1