alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 1:06-mj-70-DRB

 )

OSCAR MARTINEZ-RAMIREZ )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas CorpusAd Prosequendum, construed

as a motion (Doc. 4, filed July 28, 2006), and for good cause shown, the Court is of the opinion that

said motion should be and the same is hereby granted. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the Clerk of

this Court be and is hereby DIRECTED to issue a WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD

PROSEQUENDUM addressed to Wakulla County Jail, Crawfordville, Florida, commanding them

to deliver the said Oscar Martinez-Ramirez to any United States Marshal or Deputy United States

Marshal and directing said Marshal or Deputy to bring said prisoner before this Court to be held at

Montgomery, Alabama, on August 30, 2006, at 10:00 a.m. and to return said prisoner to said official

when the Court shall have finished with him.

DONE this the 28 day of July, 2006. th

/s/ Delores R. Boyd

DELORES R. BOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-mj-00070-DRB Document 5 Filed 07/28/2006 Page 1 of 1
5613.501 Special Documentation Requirements.    *(Added August 2016)*       (a)(ii) The J&A template can be found in the DCG. IAW FAR 13.501(a)(ii), modify the J&A to reflect the procedures in 13.5 were used.       HQ, United States Special Operations Command       Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L-K)       SOFARS 5613       February 2007 **Parent topic:** Subpart 5613.5 - SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURES FOR CERTAIN COMMERCIAL ITEMS
**Exhibit 35.2**

** **

**WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.**

** **

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATEANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

            I, Barbara Campbell, an authorized officer of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp. (the “AdministrativeAgent”), do hereby certify to WaMu Asset Acceptance Corp. (the “Depositor”) and Washington Mutual Bank (the “Servicer”), pursuant to the Amended and Restated Administrative Agent Agreement dated as of February 1, 2005 (the“Servicing Agreement”) by and between Washington Mutual Bank, as servicer, and the Administrative Agent the following with respect to WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2006-AR13 for the 2006 fiscal year (the “RelevantYear”):

 

1.        A review of the activities of the Servicer during the Relevant Year and of performance under the ServicingAgreement has been made under my supervision.

2.        To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theServicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Relevant Year.

 

Dated as of February 22, 2007.

 
|  

__/s/ Barbara Campbell________________

Name:  Barbara Campbell

Title:    First Vice President |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ruben Sorrentini, Appellant.

In a *coram nobis*proceeding, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 1, 1967, which denied the application without a hearing. Order affirmed. We find no merit to the claim that a sufficient showing of use of perjured testimony has been established to warrant a hearing on the issue. Christ, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
#### Mark Rakauskas et al., Respondents, v Grace Olivia, LLC, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

[813 NYS2d 657]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.H.O.), entered December 5, 2005, striking defendants’ answer for noncompliance with their disclosure obligations, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Defendants’ noncompliance with the Special Referee’s repeated directives to produce the QuickBooks data was willful and contumacious and warrants the striking of their answer (CPLR 3126). Even at the final conference with the Special Referee, at which defendants produced a CD-R for the first time, the information was contained in Excel-format summary documents, not the raw, detailed QuickBooks format they were advised was necessary. Absent a motion to vacate the instant order, defendants will not be heard to argue that the court *356improperly decided a motion that was not made on notice *(cf. Bear, Stearns & Co., Inc. v Enviropower, LLC,*21 AD3d 855 [2005], *appeal dismissed*6 NY3d 750 [2005]). We note that the Special Referee repeatedly advised defendants that she would recommend the striking of their answer if they did not produce the QuickBooks data *(see id.).*Concur—Andrias, J.P., Sullivan, Williams, Sweeny and McGuire, JJ.
Exhibit 35SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT     I, K. E. Middlebrooks, the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of DaimlerChryslerFinancial Services Americas LLC, the Servicer of DaimlerChrysler Auto Trust 2006-C, certify that:(a) A review of the Servicer’s activities during the reporting period and of its performanceunder the applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision. (b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.Date: March 23, 2007            /s/ K.E. Middlebrooks         K. E. Middlebrooks    Vice President and Chief Financial    Officer, DaimlerChrysler Financial    Services Americas LLC, as Servicer of    DaimlerChrysler Auto Trust 2006-C
53.110 Continuation sheets.

Except as may be otherwise indicated in the FAR, all standard forms prescribed by the FAR may be

continued on (a) plain paper of similar specification, or (b) specially constructed continuation sheets

(e.g., OF336 ). Continuation sheets shall be annotated in the upper right-hand corner with the

reference number of the document being continued and the serial page number.

Parent topic: Subpart 53.1 - General
Subpart 5647.4 - AIR TRANSPORTATION BY U.S. FLAG CARRIERS     **Parent topic:** Part 5647 - TRANSPORTATION5647.402 Policy     5647.402-9000 Flight Service Contract Distribution and Reporting.    (a) Whenever flight services are procured from an USAF Air Mobility Command (AMC) approved carrier (FAA 135 carriers), a copy of the contract must be forwarded to: HQ AMC/A3BS, 402 Scott Drive, Unit 3A1, Scott AFB, IL 62225-5302. The point of contacts are the AMC Transportation Assistants, at DSN 779-4801. If EDA distribution is utilized, provide an e-mail notice of the contract posting to the EDA site.       (b) Report the following information on contracts with USAF AMC approved carriers to AMC Transportation Assistants on a quarterly basis:       (1) Total cost of contract awards;       (2) Total number of passengers;       (3) Provide a list of open contracts for the period, including contract number, contractor’s name, total award dollars, and the number of passengers carried.              HQ, United States Special Operations Command       Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L-K)       SOFARS 5647       February 2007
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-50543

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JESUS ROCHA-NEGRETE,

also known as Jose DeJesus Rocha-Negrete,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-01-CR-650-ALL

--------------------

February 20, 2003

Before WIENER, EMILIO M. GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jesus Rocha-Negrete appeals the sentence imposed following

his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States

after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He

contends that the sentence is invalid because it exceeds the

two-year maximum term of imprisonment prescribed in 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(a). Rocha-Negrete complains that his sentence was

improperly enhanced pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b). He argues

that the sentencing provision is unconstitutional. 
No. 02-50543

-2-

Alternatively, Rocha-Negrete contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the

prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence was an

element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that

should have been alleged in his indictment. 

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Rocha-Negrete acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his arguments for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
Editorial Note on Part 782
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 782 appear at 61 FR 32643, June 25, 1996.

§ 782.17 Wheat purchased for resale. ( a ) This section applies to an importer or subsequent buyer who imports or purchases Canadian-produced wheat for the purpose of reselling the wheat.
( b ) The importer or subsequent buyer shall immediately notify each subsequent buyer, grain handler, exporter, or end user that the wheat being purchased or handled originated in Canada and may only be commingled with U.S.-produced wheat by the end user or when loaded onto a conveyance for direct delivery to the end user or a foreign country.
( c ) The importer or subsequent buyer shall provide all purchasers of Canadian-produced wheat with a photocopy of the form FSA-750 submitted to KCCO by the importer in accordance with § 782.12(a).
[60 FR 5089, Jan. 26, 1995, as amended at 61 FR 32643, June 25, 1996]
ex_10-2.htm


    
      

      

    

    Exhibit
10.2

    


    LOAN
AGREEMENT

    May 12,
2009

    


    Richard N. Jeffs (the
“Lender”) of 4 Montpelier Street, Suite 521, London, SW71EE, advanced US$7,000 (the “Principal Sum”)
to Red Metal Resources Ltd. (the “Borrower”) of 195 Park Avenue, Thunder Bay,
Ontario, P7B 1B9.  The Lender advanced the funds on May 12,
2009

     

    The
Borrower agrees to repay the Principal Sum on demand, together with interest
calculated and compounded monthly at the rate of 8% per year (the “Interest”)
from May 12, 2009..  The Borrower is liable for repayment for the
Principal Sum and accrued Interest and any costs that the Lender incurs in
trying to collect the Principal Sum and the Interest.

     

    The
Borrower will evidence the debt and its repayment of the Principal Sum and the
Interest with a promissory note in the attached form.

    
 

    
      
        
          	
                  LENDER

                	 
      	
                  BORROWER

                
	
                  Richard
      N. Jeffs

                	 
      	
                  Red
      Metal Resources Ltd.

                
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
                  Per:

                	 
      	
                  Per:

                
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
                  /s/ Richard N. Jeffs

                	 
      	
                  /s/ Caitlin Jeffs

                
	
                  Richard
      N. Jeffs

                	 
      	
                  Authorized
      Signatory

                


        

      




    
      
         


      

      
        - 1
-

        
          

        

      

      
         


      

    


     

    PROMISSORY
NOTE

    


    Principal
Amount:  US$7,000 May 12,
2009

    


    


    For value
received Red Metal Resources Ltd., (the “Borrower”) promises to pay on demand to
the order of Richard N. Jeffs (the “Lender”) the sum
of $7,000 lawful money of United States of America (the “Principal Sum”)
together with interest on the Principal Sum from May 12, 2009 (“Effective Date”)
both before and after maturity, default and judgment at the Interest Rate as
defined below.

    


    For the
purposes of this promissory note, Interest Rate means 8 per cent per
year.  Interest at the Interest Rate must be calculated and compounded
monthly not in advance from and including the Effective Date (for an effective
rate of 8.3% per annum calculated monthly), and is payable together with the
Principal Sum when the Principal Sum is repaid.

    


    The
Borrower may repay the Principal Sum and the Interest in whole or in part at any
time.

    


    The
Borrower waives presentment, protest, notice of protest and notice of dishonour
of this promissory note.

    


    


    


    BORROWER

    Red
Metal Resources Ltd.

    


    Per:
/s/ Caitlin Jeffs

    


    


    


    Authorized
signatory

    



    
      
         


      

      
        - 2
-
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-30717 Summary Calendar

SOLOMON B. GUILLORY, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus TERRY TERRELL, Warden, Allen Correctional Center, Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CV-420-P

- - - - - - - - - - February 28, 1997 Before GARWOOD, DeMOSS and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Solomon B. Guillory, Louisiana state prisoner #120347, appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He argues that the state trial court’s reasonable doubt instruction was unconstitutional, that the state trial court’s instruction to the jury on the law of principals was unconstitutional and deprivedNo. 96-30717 - 2 - him of his right to due process, that he was denied equal protection of the laws because other criminal defendants have previously been granted relief on the same errors which he has alleged, that he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his attorney failed to object to the state trial court’s reasonable doubt instruction, and that he was denied due process by a cumulation of errors committed during the course of his trial. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Further, because Guillory failed to adequately brief his claim that he was denied due process by a cumulation of errors committed during the course of his trial, this issue is deemed abandoned on appeal. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir 1993). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
52.241-2 Order of Precedence-Utilities.       As prescribed in 41.501(c)(1), insert a clause substantially the same as the following:          Order of Precedence-Utilities (Feb 1995)          In the event of any inconsistency between the terms of this contract (including the specifications) and any rate schedule, rider, or exhibit incorporated in this contract by reference or otherwise, or any of the Contractor’s rules and regulations, the terms of this contract shall control.          (End of clause)    **Parent topic:** 52.241 Utility Services Provisions and Clauses.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Bill the Butcher, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended August 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), J'Amy Owens , Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m or §78o(d)); and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:
/s/  J’Amy OwensDate: February 26, 2013

J’Amy OwensChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)





This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 63 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 63 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 63 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 3 of 3
**6** directories						**39** files						**584 KiB** total 						
						List											Grid
PART 29 ––TAXES       SUBPART 29.1 — GENERAL                                                         29.101 Resolving tax problems.    SUBPART 29.1 — GENERAL     29.101 Resolving tax problems.    (a)(S-90) Contracting officers should request assistance from legal counsel and the PL842 Cost and Pricing Branch. PL842 can provide assistance on applicability and reasonableness prior to negotiations.
252.227-7028 Technical Data or Computer Software Previously Delivered to the Government.       As prescribed in                 227.7104             (f)(2), or                 227.7203-6             (e), use the following provision:          TECHNICAL DATA OR COMPUTER SOFTWARE PREVIOUSLY DELIVERED TO THE GOVERNMENT (JUN 1995)          The Offeror shall attach to its offer an identification of all documents or other media incorporating technical data or computer software it intends to deliver under this contract with other than unlimited rights that are identical or substantially similar to documents or other media that the Offeror has produced for, delivered to, or is obligated to deliver to the Government under any contract or subcontract.  The attachment shall identify—          (a)  The contract number under which the data or software were produced;          (b)  The contract number under which, and the name and address of the organization to whom, the data or software were most recently delivered or will be delivered; and          (c)  Any limitations on the Government's rights to use or disclose the data or software, including, when applicable, identification of the earliest date the limitations expire.          (End of provision)    **Parent topic:** 252.227 RESERVED
§ 906.5 Fruit. *Fruit* means either or both of the following citrus fruits grown in the production area: ( a ) Citrus grandis, Osbeck, commonly called grapefruit, and
( b ) Citrus sinensis, Osbeck, commonly called oranges.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting:

*Time and Date:*                         11 a.m.-3 p.m., February 25, 2011 (Closed).                    

*Place:*                         Teleconference.                    

*Status:*                         The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.                    

*Matters to be Discussed:*                         The meeting will include the initial review, discussion, and evaluation of “Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), DP11-001 Panel D.”                    

*Contact Person for More Information:*                         Donald Blackman, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, CDC, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office of the Director, Extramural Research Program Office, 4770 Buford Highway, NE., Mailstop K-92, Atlanta, GA 30341, Telephone: (770) 488-3023, e-mail:                         *DBY7@cdc.gov.*

                        The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                    

Dated: December 2, 2010.

Elaine L. Baker,

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2010-31143 Filed 12-10-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
§ 771.14 Loan monitoring. ( a ) *Annual and periodic reviews.* At least annually, the borrower will meet with FSA representatives to review the financial status of the borrower, assess the progress of the eradication program utilizing loan funds, and identify any potential problems or concerns.
( b ) *Performance monitoring.* At any time FSA determines it necessary, the borrower must allow FSA or its representative to review the operations and financial condition of the borrower. This may include, but is not limited to, field visits, and attendance at Foundation Board meetings. Upon FSA request, a borrower must submit any financial or other information within 14 days unless the data requested is not available within that time frame.